Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-10-2018 Council PacketAgenda Council Meeting Monday, December 10, 2018, 6:30 P.M. Orono Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 952-249-4600 / www.ci.orono.mn.us The public is invited to address the council regarding any item on the regular agenda. If your topic is not on the agenda, you may speak during the Public Comments section. Roll Call Pledge of Allegiance Truth in Taxation Public Hearing — 6:30 p.m. 1. 2019 Budget Hearing a. 2019 Budget Information b. Adopt Final 2018 Levy Collectible in 2019 c. Adopt Final 2019 General Fund Budget d. Adopt the 2019 Special Revenue Funds Budgets Approval of Agenda Consent Agenda 2. Council Meeting Minutes of November 26, 2018 3. Council Work Session Minutes of November 26, 2018 4. Claims/Bills 5. Approve 2018 Interfund and Transfers 6. Adopt 2019 Fee Schedule 7. Adopt 2019 Capital Improvement Plan 8. Close Fund 318 — 2005 GO HRA Public Facilities Bond 9. Close Fund 320 — 2008 Street Reconstruction 10. Reduce Debt Levy Requirement Series 2014A 11. Reduce Debt Levy Requirement Series 2016 Bonds 12. Authorization to Disburse Claims 13. 2019 Non -Union Compensation 14. Approve Non -Employee Reimbursement 15. Resolution Designating Polling Locations 16. Liquor Violation — Navarre Liquors 17. Ordinance Amendment — Mayor's Term of Office 18. 2019 Public Works Plan 19. Personnel Policy Amendment 20. Accept Resignation of Officer Amy Swanson 21. Request to Hire Full -Time Police Officer 22. LAI 8-000014 Lake West Development, 3570 and 3600 Ivy Place — Resolution Amendment 23. LAI 8-000057 - City of Orono, Text Amendment: Accessory Buildings & Structure Setbacks — Ordinance & Summary Ordinance Sign up for email notifications at www.ci.orono.mn.us — follow links for Stay Connected & Email Notification Agenda Council Meeting Monday, December 10, 2018, 6:30 P.M. Orono Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 952-249-4600 / www.ci.orono.mn.us Public Comments — (Limit 5 Minutes per Person) This is an opportunity for the public to address matters not on the agenda. The council will not engage in discussion or take action on items presented at this time. However, the council may refer issues to staff for follow up or consideration at a future meeting. Speakers should state their name and home address at the podium before speaking. Presentation 24. Resolution of Appreciation for Wendy Dankey 25. Steve Tallen — City Prosecutor Public Hearing 26. LA18-000096 — ISD 278, 685 Old Crystal Bay Road, Variance Public Hearing 27. LAI 8-000092 —Easement Vacation —Public Hearing Planning Department Report (Planning Commission Representative — Chad Olson) 28. LA18-000044 —City of Orono, Comprehensive Plan 29. LA18-000084 — City of Orono, Text Amendment: Land Alterations & Summary Ordinance 30. LAI 8-000086 —Paul Vogstrom o/b/o William & Sue Dunkley & Eric Vogstrom, 2710 Pence Ln — Average Lakeshore Setback Variance Mayor/Council Report City Administrator Report City Attorney Report 31. The meeting will be closed as permitted by the attorney-client privilege to discuss strategy related to the following three lawsuits: A. Peter Lanpher and Penny Rogers v. City of Orono and Jay T. Nygard, Kendall M. Nygard, Go Green Energy. Court File No. 27 -CV -17-7166 B. Fred Johnson v. City of Orono C. Matthew C. Johnson; Susanne Johnson; S. David Feldshon; and Archelle Georgiou Feldson v. The City of Orono; et al. Court File No. 27 -CV -17-1030 Adjournment Upcoming Events 2018 12-10-18 City Council Meeting, Monday 7:00 p.m. Sign up for email notifications at www.ci.orono.mn.us — follow links for Stay Connected & Email Notification Agenda Council Meeting Monday, December 10, 2018, 6:30 P.M. Orono Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 952-249-4600 / www.ci.orono.mn.us 12-24-18 Official Holiday, City Offices Closed 12-25-18 Official Holiday, City Offices Closed 2019 01-01-19 Official Holiday, City Offices Closed 01-07-19 Park Commission Meeting, Monday 6:30 p.m. 01-14-19 City council Meeting, Monday 7:00 p.m. 01-21-19 Official Holiday, City Offices Closed 01-22-19 Planning Commission Meeting, Monday 6:30 p.m. (Richard F. Crosby fl) 01-28-19 Council Work Session, Monday 5:00 p.m. 01-28-19 City Council Meeting, Monday, 7:00 p.m. Sign up for email notifications at www.ci.orono.mn.us — follow links for Stay Connected & Email Notification AGENDA ITEM Item No.: Item Description: 2019 Budget Hearing Date: December 10, 2018 Presenter: Ron Olson Agenda Truth In Taxation Finance Director Section: Public Hearing 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to approve the 2019 General Fund Budget, Tax Levy, and the 2019 Special Revenue Fund Budgets. 2. Background. Prior to the adoption of the 2019 budget and tax levy, the City is required to hold a public hearing to allow public input on the budget and tax levy. By law, this hearing must occur between November 24th and December 28th. When the preliminary tax levy and budget was approved in September, the public hearing was set for December 10, 2018 at 6:30. This public hearing is the final step prior to adoption of the budget and tax levy. The budget process was begun by staff at the beginning of June. At a work session held on June 25th the Council was provided background information on the budget and an overview of the budget challenges for 2018. Over the summer, a draft budget was prepared and reviewed by the Council at work sessions in July and August. In September the preliminary budget and tax levy was publically presented at the meeting of August 27' and adopted at the September 24' council meeting. In addition to the work on the actual budget, staff has been working on updating the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The CIP identifies the long-term infrastructure needs and is a valuable tool in the budgeting process. The CIP will also be approve as part of tonight's meeting. In conjunction with the budget process, staff has also been reviewing the fee schedule. Review of a majority of the fee schedule has been completed. At this time staff is still working on the water and sewer rates. The 2019 fee schedule, as currently amended, will be adopted at tonight's meeting with an amendment made in January for the 2019 water rates. Tax Lew The total tax levy required to fund the 2019 budget is $5,635,450. This is an increase of $195,499 or 3.59% over the 2018 levy. A portion of the increase to the levy, $161,450, is designated for funding the City's Pavement Management Plan to address the City's aging road infrastructure. The remaining increase of $34,049 is an increase to the General Fund operating levy. Even with the increase in the levy, the City's tax rate decreased from 16.555% to 16.378%. Orono continues to have one of the lowest tax rates in both Hennepin County (ranking 42 of 45 cities), and the State of Minnesota. The tax levy is used to fund the general operations of the City (General Fund), pay the debt service on the City's outstanding bonds, and to fund the Pavement Management Fund. A levy amount of $544,450 was approved in the preliminary tax levy. This has not changed in the final tax levy. The breakdown of the 2019 levy is $711,000 for debt service, $544,450 for roads, and the remaining $4,380,000 is used in the General Fund. Prepared By: J*JU Reviewed By: 51V Approved By: -TV AGENDA ITEM Tax Cauacity Rate and the Imbact of the Tax Lew on Property Owners The County Assessor provides an annual calculation of the City's tax capacity based on the annual property revaluation. As of October 31, 2018, the City's taxable market value is $3,004,167,366 with a tax capacity of $34,109,993. When compared to last year, taxable market value has increased by 4.32% and the tax capacity by 4.68%. As a result of the City's increased tax capacity, the tax capacity rate will decrease from 16.555% in 2018 to 16.378% in 2019. Using this tax rate and assuming no change in a property's value, the City's share of the property tax bill would be: a decrease of $4.16 (-1.07% on a home previously valued at $250,000; a decrease in tax of $8.85 (-1.07%) on a $500,000 home; a $1,000,000 home will see a decrease of $19.91 (-1.07%); and a $2,000,000 home has a decrease of $42.04 (-1.07%). The actual tax impact on any particular property will depend on how the property's taxable value changed in relation to the rest of the City. Tables illustrating a 5% increase in value and a 5% decrease in value are included in this budget document. General Fund Budget General Fund Expenditures The 2019 expenditure budget is $8,577,280 which is an increase of $383,879 (4.68%) over the 2018 budget. This increase is the result of a $95,000 increase in Personal Services, a $217,619 increase in Professional Services, and a $100,000 increase in Contingency. The increase in Personal Services is due to step increases and a COLA increase of 2.5% for union and non-union employees. The increase would have been larger but the wages for the IT Technician have been moved to the IT Internal Service Fund. The increase for Professional Services is due to some actual increases for Legal ($17,000), Engineering ($5,000) and Pass-through charges ($30,000). The majority of the Professional Services increase is due to a shift in coding as a result of the creation of the IT Fund. IT related expenditures that were previously coded to wages (IT Tech), Other Expenses, and supplies and maintenance are now coded to a new line item (IT Services) in the Professional Services category. The increase to Contingencies is due to reestablishing the line item that had been removed from the 2018 budget. General Fund Revenues For revenues the General Fund budget also totals $8,577,280 and is increasing by $383,880. The largest increase in revenues is the Administrative Charges for Service line $165,170. This revenue is from charges to other funds, mainly Water, Sewer, Storm Sewer for costs incurred by the General Fund in support of the other funds. Other increases are Property Taxes ($34,950), Building Permits ($29,000), Police State Aid ($20,000), Police Service Contracts ($62,000), and Interest on Investments ($41,000). There are other smaller increases for a total revenue increase of $383,880. Special Revenue Funds The special revenue funds that budgets are adopted for are the Park Fund, The Drug Forfeiture Fund, and the TIF Fund. Special revenue funds by definition have a primary source of revenue that is dedicated for a specific purpose. In the Park Fund the primary revenue source is park dedication fees collected from developers. By state law, these funds must be used for parkland acquisition and development. The Drug Forfeiture Fund receives its primary funding from the Police Department's drug and alcohol enforcement activities. The funds must be used for drug and alcohol related activities. The TIF Fund is used to account for revenues related to the Orono Woods Senior Housing Development. Prepared By: J*JU Reviewed By: 51V Approved By: J1V AGENDA ITEM Debt Service Levies The 2019 levy for debt service is $711,000. This levy is used to pay the debt service on the City's outstanding bonds. Enterprise Funds The Water, Sewer, Stormwater, and Recycling Funds are designed to account for the business type activities of the City. These funds do not receive any property tax revenue. The goal for the Enterprise funds is to be fully funded by rates without depending on special assessments for infrastructure improvements. While there is no formal adoption of the expenditure budgets, the information is included in the budget book. On the revenue side of the budget, the utility rates are approved annually as part of the fee schedule. The utility rate increases being recommended are Water 11 %; Sewer 4%, Stormwater 10%, and Recycling by 11%. With the exception of the water rate increase, the utility rates will be approved tonight as part of the 2019 Fee Schedule. For water, the overall rate increase will be 11%, however, staff is still working on developing a new rate structure to more accurately charge customers based on the water system that they are connected to (North, South, Wayzata, or Long Lake). Water The water fund has historically been operating at a loss. Because depreciation is a non-cash expenditure, the fund has had a positive operating cash flow since 2009. In previous years, the operating loss has been covered by the revenue received from antenna leases on the water towers. The revenue from the antenna leases has been moved out of the Water budget and this revenue decrease will be recovered through water rates. As presented, the operating budget for 2019 will have an operating loss of $181,120. The expenditure budget is increasing by $217,732 (34.29%). $86,660 of the increase is due to an increase in Administrative Charge. The operating transfer of $55,000 is to the debt service fund supporting the Casco Point Bonds ($55,000). The non-operating interest expense is for the interest on the 2014 Water Bonds. 2019 capital expenditures as identified in the draft CIP include painting the north and south water plant, well #3 screening, a water main replacement at CSAH 15/19, water valve replacements and water meter replacements. The 2019 capital expenditures total $474,855. The Water Fund's current cash balance is $528,892.81. Sewer In recent years, the sewer fund has mostly operated at a loss. Non-operating revenues however, have consistently offset the operating losses. This has resulted in a positive operating cash flow for the fund. The single largest expense for the sewer fund is the Met Council disposal charges. The three years have seen increases in the amounts of $37,410 (9.5%), $41,277 (9.6%) and $123,425 (28.6) respectively. This is a 40% increase in three years. As has been discussed with the Council during previous budget processes, heavy rains and high water tables increase the flow through the MCES lift stations and increase our disposal charges. The total operating expenditure budget is increasing by $213,675 (15.2%) The major increases are the previously mentioned MCES charges ($123,425), repairs and maintenance for sewer lines ($57,280) and the Administrative Charge ($70,660). The operating transfer is to cover the sewer improvements that were part of the Casco Point project and will continue for another five years. Prepared By: J*JU Reviewed By: 51V Approved By: JIV AGENDA ITEM Upcoming capital expenditures can be covered by the fund's current cash balances. Projects identified in the CIP for 2019 include: Annual sewer rehabilitation ($281,377), Sewer televising ($48,690), additional generators ($150,000), lift station updates ($116,000); lift station monitoring improvements ($26,000), sewer main replacements ($198,000), and a generator rehabilitation ($10,000), for a total of $820,068. The current cash balance for the fund is $2,120.498. Stormwater The Stormwater Fund is for the most part project based. Operating expenditures are mainly limited to engineering associated with NPDES, SWPPP and other state and federal requirements. Public Works time and materials spent on culvert cleaning/replacement are also charged to this fund. The purpose of this fund is to collect money for the larger Stormwater projects that will be required in the future. The attached five- year projection assumes a 10% annual increase. Potential CIP projects in 2019 include: Watershed Delineation and Pond Assessments ($10,000), Forest Arms Lane ($69,324), East Long Lake S ($63,515), Tonkaview Lane ($87,531), Chevy Chase Drive ($146,330), East long Lake Road N ($82,000), Storm Sewer Improvements ($200,000), TMDL Updates ($50,000), and OCB pipe upsizing (88,500). The capital expenditures total $798,200. The funds current cash balance is $1,588,728. Recycling The recycling funds major expenditure line is for contracted recycling charges. The current contract with Waste Management is increasing 2.5% increase. The Recycled Materials offset that the City was receiving in 2017 has not been being paid in 2018. The offset is based on the market for recycled materials which weakened it 2018. The full time wages that are charged to the fund represent 10% of the City Clerks wages. The current cash balance is $28,866. Cable The Cable funds projected revenues are based on current subscriber information and rates. The line item for Internet/Other communications covers the costs associated with streaming and online access of council meetings. It has been increased to pay for the increased cost of our fiber internet connection. Revenue for the fund is in the from franchise fees that are set by the City's franchise agreement with Mediacom. Capital Expenditures in 2019 will include upgrades to the presentation equipment in the Council Chambers. The current cash balance of the fund is $156,994. Construction Funds The City does not adopt formal budgets for construction funds. Possible projects for these funds can be found in the CIP. The CIP is a planning tool only; approval of the CIP not approve or authorize any purchases. The projects identified in it will require individual approval from the Council before they can be started. Capital Improvement Plan In 2012 the City formally adopted a Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). In order to keep the CIP useful, it is updated on a yearly basis. An updated copy of the CIP for 2019 is included with this memo and will be approved tonight. The CIP is a planning document only and approval of the CIP does not constitute approval of any expenditures. There are two main focusses of the CIP. First is the CIP items that have been identified as needs by staff. Prepared By: J*JU Reviewed By: 11V Approved By: -TV AGENDA ITEM The Second is available funding for the CIP. Many funding sources are not adequate to fund the CIP items so funding will need to be secured prior to moving forward with the projects. The funding for the Street CIP includes an additional $300,000 in tax levy starting in 2023. In that year, the levy needed for debt service will decrease by $300,000 and by transferring the levy to the CIP, there will be adequate funding for roads. This increased levy for the CIP will require Council approval at that time. 3. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of the attached budget resolutions setting the 2019 Property Tax Levy, the 2019 General Fund Budget, the 2019 Special Revenue Fund Budgets, and the 2018 Enterprise Fund Budgets. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motions to approve the 2019 Property Tax Levy, the 2019 General Fund Budget, the 2019 Special Revenue Fund Budgets, and the 2019 Enterprise Fund Budget. Exhibits A. Resolution Adopting the 2019 Property Tax Levy B. Resolution Adopting the Final 2019 General Fund Budget C. Resolution Adopting the 2019 Special Revenue Fund Budgets D. Resolution Adopting the 2019 Enterprise Fund Budgets E. Draft 2019 Budget Book Prepared By: J*JU Reviewed By: -1V Approved By: -TV City of Orono, Minnesota 2019 Annual Budget �oNo y R� `q kFSHo City of Orono 2019 Annual Budget Table of Contents Section 1: Introduction & Summary Introduction/Budget Summary .................................................. TBD Fund and Department Descriptions ................................................ 5 Resolutions.................................................................................... 13 TaxLevies..................................................................................... 17 Effect of the Budget on Residential Homes .................................. 18 General Fund Revenues................................................................ 21 General Fund Expenditures........................................................... 25 Summary of all Funds................................................................... 29 Outstanding Debt.......................................................................... 31 DebtProjection............................................................................. 32 Section 2: Changes in Fund Balance/Retained Earnings Summary....................................................................................... 33 GeneralFund................................................................................. 35 Special Revenue Funds................................................................. 36 Debt Service Funds....................................................................... 43 Capital Project Funds.................................................................... 48 Enterprise Funds........................................................................... 55 Section 3: Operating Budgets General Fund — Department Summaries ........................................ 61 General Fund — Line Items............................................................ 79 Enterprise Fund Summaries ..........................................................105 Enterprise Fund — Line Items ........................................................111 City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 3 City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 4 Fund and Department Descriptions City Budgets can be confusing due to the number of funds and departments involved. The following descriptions of the General Fund departments and the other funds maintained by the City is designed to give the user of this document a basic understanding of the purpose of each department and fund. General Fund —This is the general operating fund of the City. It is used to account for all financial resources except those required to be accounted for in another fund. The General Fund budget is made up of the following departmental budgets: Mayor and Council — The City Council oversees the policies and procedures that govern the City in promoting the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of Orono. This budget includes the wages and employment taxes of the Council; memberships in the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District, the League of Minnesota Cities, Metro Cities, and the Suburban Rate Authority. Administration —The Administration Department includes the City Administrator who is responsible for meeting statutory and legal obligations, implementing policy established by the City Council and ensuring the successful management of all city operations. The City Clerk and the rest of the administrative staff perform various functions such as: customer service, permits and licensing, elections, record management, and general administrative duties. • Elections—The Elections Department administers all federal, state, county, and municipal elections held in the city. Elections are held in even numbered years. Assessing—The Assessing Department performs assessing services in accordance with the requirements of the State of Minnesota. The City maintains a contract with Hennepin County for assessing services. Finance — The Finance Department oversees the City's financial operations, risk management, and employee benefits. It is responsible for preparing the budget and Comprehensive Annual Financial Report in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Legal —The Legal Department includes professional representation and opinion on city services and operations, prosecution services, and jail charges. The City maintains renewable contracts with both a civil law firm and a prosecutor for legal services. Central Services — The Central Services provides for those operating expenses that encompass all General Fund city departments with the exception of the Police Department. Expenditures include supplies, utilities, municipal insurance coverage, janitorial, and building maintenance. Human Services—The Human Services Department contracts with area organizations to provide for valuable services for the community. Current contracts are with The Gillespie Center for senior services and Orono Community Education for summer recreation programs. City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 5 Police —The Police Department provides for the public safety within Orono and surrounding communities. The City has renewable contracts with the Cities of Spring Park, Minnetonka Beach, and Mound. Due to the contractual agreements the department operates as a "cost center" and is the only General Fund department that has expenditures for costs that are normally covered by Central Services. This budget is also the only one within the General Fund that includes capital expenditures. • Fire — the expenditures of the Fire Department are comprised of renewable contracts with the Cities of Long Lake and Wayzata for fire suppression services. Planning and Zoning—The Planning and Zoning Department oversees the development and redevelopment within the City, including building inspections, in accordance with established policies and guidelines. The policies and guidelines have been created to maintain the health, safety, and welfare of the public, as well as maintaining the aesthetics of the community. • Engineering—The Engineering Department provides professional representation and opinion on city services and operations. This function is provided by a local engineering firm that is retained on a contract basis. Street Maintenance — The Street Department provides for the maintenance of all city streets to ensure a safe and drivable condition. Standard maintenance includes, patching, snow plowing, and striping. • Parks and Recreation —The Parks and Recreation Department provides for the maintenance of the City's parks. • Golf Course —The Golf Course provides golfing opportunities for both residents and visitors to the City. During the winter months the course is open to sledding. Special Services—The Special Services Department is used to account for expenditures that benefit a single property or organization. An example of this type of expenditure is the legal and engineering fees incurred as the result of a request for a varience, a subdivision application, or other major development. Other expenditures that are included in this department are requests for additional police security or traffic control related to an event. The costs recorded in this department are offset by revenues received for the services provided. • Special Projects and Contingencies—The Special Projects and Contingencies Department budget include the annual operating transfer to the Improvement & Equipment Outlay Fund for the purchase of capital equipment for General Fund Departments other than for the Police Department. The department also includes an amount for any unforeseen circumstances that produce additional expenses or revenue shortfalls. City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 6 Special Revenue Funds — Special Revenue Funds provide for funding of expenditures that are primarily funded by a revenue source that is not part of the general tax levy and has a restricted use. • Park Fund —The Park Fund's major revenue source are Park Dedication Fees collected as part of a subdivision or major development process. By state law fees received must be placed in a special fund and can be used for specific purposes. Park dedication fees must be used only for the acquisition and development or improvement of parks, recreational facilities, playgrounds, trails, wetlands, or open space based on the approved park systems plan. Drug and Felony Forfeiture Fund —The Drug and Felony Forfeiture Fund's major sources of revenue are the sale of DWI forfeited vehicles and revenue received from drug enforcement activities. The funds are restricted for law enforcement activities related to alcohol and drug enforcement. Senior Housing TIF Fund — The Senior Housing TIF Fund was created to provide housing opportunities for seniors within the City. Its major revenue source is the additional property taxes collected on the captured value of the property. 90% of the funds collected are forwarded to the developer to help pay for the bonds associated with the project. City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 7 Debt Service Funds — Debt Service Funds are used to pay for debt service on the City's outstanding bonds. Funding for debt service funds can include: property taxes; special assessments, debt support from other funds; or a combination of the three. • 2008 GO Street Reconstruction Bond —The 2008 bonds were issued to fund the City's Pavement Management Plan. Funding is a combination of property taxes and debt support transfers from the Water and Sewer funds to pay for utility work that was completed as part of the project. 2010 General Obligation Bonds —The 2010 bonds were issued for multiple purposes: to refund the 2003 HRA Public Facility Bonds (Navarre Fire); to fund the reconstruction of Old Crystal Bay Road; and to fund the reclamation of Orono Orchard Road. The refunding portion of the bond issue save the City an estimated $47,125. Funding is a combination of property taxes and Municipal State Aid money from the State of Minnesota 2014 General Obligation Bonds—The 2014 bonds were issued for multiple purposes: to refund the 2005 HRA Public Project Revenue Bonds (Big Island); to fund water infrastructure improvements including a new well; and to fund the construction of the Public Safety Garage. Funding is a combination of property taxes; water revenues; and a transfer from the General Fund related to revenues from the Mound police service contract. City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 8 Capital Project Funds — Capital project funds are used to account for the financing of street projects, equipment replacement, public safety equipment, and facility rehabilitation or renovation. Revenue sources are provided mainly through transfers, special assessments, and bond sales. • Municipal State Aid (MSA) Fund —The MSA Fund provides for the improvement of designated state aid streets which are funded by State of Minnesota funds. • Improvement & Equipment Outlay Fund —The Improvement & Equipment Outlay Fund provides for the purchase of equipment and the construction or renovation of City facilities. • Permanent Improvement Revolving (PIR) Fund —The PIR Fund is designed to provide temporary financing of projects until permanent financing is available. • Community Investment Fund —The Community Investment Fund provides funding for projects of citywide importance that have no other funding source. City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 9 Enterprise Funds — Enterprise Funds are used to account for the business type activities of the City. These include the following funds: Water, Sewer, Stormwater, and Recycling. Water — The Water Fund is used to account for the City's utility. The system consists of two water towers, three wells, 18 miles of water mains, and serves 986 customers. • Sewer—The Sewer Fund is used to account for the City's sewer utility. The system consists of 47 miles of sewer lines and 46 pumping stations, and serves 2,194 customers. The largest expense for the fund is a charge from the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services to pay for their collector lines and the treatment of the wastewater. • Cable TV—The Cable TV Fund was created to account for revenues collected as part of the franchise agreement between the City and Mediacom. • Stormwater — The Stormwater Fund is used to account for the City's stormwater utility. The system consists of culverts, collection ponds, and drainage ways. The utility was created in order to provide funding needed to comply with State and Federal mandates regarding stormwater. All properties within the city are charged a stormwater fee. • Recycling — the city contracts with Waste Management to provide for curbside recycling service. Funding is provided through a combination of a grant from Hennepin County and user fees. In addition the city coordinates a spring cleanup day to assist residents who have materials unsuitable for recycling or regular waste service. City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 10 Internal Service Funds— Internal Service Funds are used to track revenue and expense shifts between departments. These include the following funds: Insurance, Fleet Management, Compensated Absences, and Information Technology. Insurance - The Insurance Fund was created to account for total insurance revenue and expenses between all departments. • Fleet Management—The Fleet Management Fund is used to account for total expenses related to city vehicles. Each fund pays into this fund to cover their appropriate portions of expenses. Compensated Absences—The Compensated Absences Fund is used to account the liability owed to employees for compensated absences such as Sick, Vacation, Overtime and Comp -Time. • Information Technology (IT) - The IT Fund is used to account for total expenses related to software and technology. Each fund pays into this fund to cover their appropriate portions of expenses. City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 11 City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 12 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION TO ADOPT THE FINAL 2019 GENERAL FUND BUDGET BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Orono, County of Hennepin, Minnesota that the final 2019 General Fund budget is determined to be as follows: APPROPRIATED EXPENDITURES General Government ESTIMATED REVENUES Taxes - General $4,390,000 Licenses and Permits 496,750 Intergovernmental 270,220 Charges for Services 3,037,900 Fines and Forfeits 80,100 Interest Income 96,410 Recreation Fees 176,000 Miscellaneous 29,900 TOTAL 8 577 280 APPROPRIATED EXPENDITURES General Government $1,370,000 Public Safety 5,433,180 Street Maintenance 513,180 Parks and Recreation 431,170 Engineering - Unallocated 20,000 Reimbursable Expenditures 125,750 Special Projects and Contingency 100,000 Capital Outlay 184,000 Transfers to Other Funds 400,000 TOTAL 8 577 280 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held December 10, 2018. ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 13 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE FINAL 2019 PROPERTY TAX LEVY BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Orono, County of Hennepin, Minnesota, that the following sums be levied for the current year, collectible in 2019 upon the taxable property in the City of Orono, for the following purposes: General Fund - Operating $4,380,000 Pavement Management Levy 544,450 G.O Improvement Bond 2010 132,725 G.O. Improvement Bond 2014 165,300 G.O. Improvement Bond 2016 412,975 TOTAL ALL LEVIES &5k35 450 The City Clerk is hereby instructed to transmit a certified copy of this resolution to the County Auditor of Hennepin County, Minnesota. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held December 10, 2018. ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 14 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION TO ADOPT THE 2019 SPECIAL REVENUE FUND BUDGETS BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Orono, County of Hennepin, Minnesota that the 2019 Special Revenue Fund budgets are determined to be as follows: Appropriated Expenditures General Government $ - - $ - - $ 60,000 Public Safety - - 20,000 - - Streets - - - - - - Parks & Recreation 339,500 - - - - Transfers to Other Funds - - - - - - Increase to Fund Balance - - 6,000 17,000 Total Expenditures 339 500 26 000 77 000 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held December 10, 2018. ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 15 Drug/Felony Estimated Revenues Park Forfeiture TIF Taxes — General $ - - $ - - 77,000 Interest Income 5,000 1,000 - - User Fees / Loan Payment - - 25,000 - - Park Dedication Fees 5,500 - - - - Intergovernmental - - - - - - Transfers from other Funds - - - - - Use of Fund Balance 329,000 - - - - Total Revenues 339 500 26 000 77 000 Appropriated Expenditures General Government $ - - $ - - $ 60,000 Public Safety - - 20,000 - - Streets - - - - - - Parks & Recreation 339,500 - - - - Transfers to Other Funds - - - - - - Increase to Fund Balance - - 6,000 17,000 Total Expenditures 339 500 26 000 77 000 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held December 10, 2018. ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 15 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION TO ADOPT THE 2019 ENTERPRISE FUND BUDGETS BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Orono, County of Hennepin, Minnesota that the 2019 Enterprise Fund budgets are determined to be as follows: Estimated Revenues Charges for Service Interest Income Non -Operating Total Revenues Appropriated Expenditures Operating Expenses Non -Operating Expenses Interest Expense Debt Service Transfer to Other Funds Total Expenditures Water Sewer Recycling Stormwater Cable $ 671,550 $1,372,010 $110,290 $281,160 $76,000 10,000 35,000 -- 15,000 1,000 -- 20,000 29,500 -- -- 681 550 1 427 010 $139,790 296,160 77 000 $852,670 $1,624,175 $134,530 $356,810 $67,030 22,040 80,000 55,000 110,000 -- -- -- 1 009 710 1 558,711M0 150 $199,564 61 515 Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held December 10, 2018. ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 16 TAX LEVIES General Fund Pavement Management GO Improvement 2010 GO Improvement 2014 GO Improvement 2016 Total Local Tax Capacity Rate City of Orono Local Levy 2018 2019 Over / Under 2018 2019 Amount Percent $4,345,951 $4,380,000 $34,049 383,000 544,450 $161,450 130,470 132,725 $2,255 174,000 165,300 -$8,700 406,530 412,975 $6,445 $5,439,951 $5,635,450 $195,499 0.78% 42.15% 1.73% -5.00% NA 3.59% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 17 Levy Increase Tax Capacity (N Tax Capacity R Net City Tax $ Increase from % Increase from Effect of 2019 Tax Levy & Budget on Residential Properties No Change in Value m Actual Estimated Actual Estimated Actual Estimated Actual Estimated 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 Value $250,000 $250,000 $500,000 $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 MVE $14,740 $14,740 $0 $0 $0 Tax Value $235,260 $235,260 $500,000 $500,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 4.49% 4.49% 4.49% 4.49% et) 2,353 2,353 5,000 5,000 11,250 11,250 23,750 23,750 ate 16.555% 16.378% 16.555% 16.378% 16.555% 16.378% 16.555% 16.378% $389.54 $385.37 $827.75 $818.90 $1,862.44 $1,842.53 $3,931.81 $3,889.78 2018 -$4.16 -$8.85 -$19.91 -$42.04 2018 -1.07% -1.07% -1.07% -1.07% Tax Capacity (net) = 1 % of first $500,000 market value, plus 1.25% of all value over $500,000 ** Assumes no change in value City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 18 Levy Increase Tax Capacity (N Tax Capacity R� Net City Tax $ Increase from % Increase frorr Effect of 2019 Tax Levy & Budget on Residential Properties 5.0% Decrease in Value Tax Capacity (net) = 1 % of first $500,000 market value, plus 1.25% of all value over $500,000 ** Assumes a 5.0% decrease in value City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 19 Actual Estimated Actual Estimated Actual Estimated Actual Estimated 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 Value $250,000 $237,500 $500,000 $475,000 $1,000,000 $950,000 $2,000,000 $1,900,000 MVE $14,740 $15,865 $0 $0 $0 Tax Value $235,260 $221,635 $500,000 $475,000 $1,000,000 $950,000 $2,000,000 $1,900,000 4.49% 4.49% 4.49% 4.49% et) 2,353 2,271 5,000 4,688 11,250 10,625 23,750 22,500 ite 16.555% 16.378% 16.555% 16.378% 16.555% 16.378% 16.555% 16.378% $389.54 $371.94 $827.75 $767.72 $1,862.44 $1,740.16 $3,931.81 $3,685.05 2018 -$17.59 -$60.03 -$122.28 -$246.76 12018 -4.52% -7.25% -6.57% -6.28% Tax Capacity (net) = 1 % of first $500,000 market value, plus 1.25% of all value over $500,000 ** Assumes a 5.0% decrease in value City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 19 Levy Increase Tax Capacity (N Tax Capacity R Net City Tax $ Increase from % Increase from Effect of 2019 Tax Levy & Budget on Residential Properties 5.0% Increase in Value m Actual Estimated Actual Estimated Actual Estimated Actual Estimated 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 Value $250,000 $262,500 $500,000 $525,000 $1,000,000 $1,050,000 $2,000,000 $2,100,000 MVE $14,740 $13,615 $0 $0 $0 Tax Value $235,260 $248,885 $500,000 $525,000 $1,000,000 $1,050,000 $2,000,000 $2,100,000 4.49% 4.49% 4.49% 4.49% et) 2,353 2,489 5,000 5,313 11,250 11,875 23,750 25,000 ate 16.555% 16.378% 16.555% 16.378% 16.555% 16.378% 16.555% 16.378% $389.54 $407.65 $827.75 $870.08 $1,862.44 $1,944.89 $3,931.81 $4,094.50 2018 $18.11 $42.33 $82.45 $162.69 2018 4.65% 5.11% 4.43% 4.14% Tax Capacity (net) = 1 % of first $500,000 market value, plus 1.25% of all value over $500,000 ** Assumes a 5.0% Increase in value City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 20 City of Orono 2019 Revenue Budget Summary Percentage 2017 Y -T -D 2018 2019 Increase Increase Revenue Source Actual Aug 31,2018 Budget Budget (Decrease) (Decrease) Current Ad Valorem Taxes 4,172,237 - 4,345,050 4,380,000 34,950 0.8% Delinquent Ad Valorem Taxes (15,814) 10,000 10,000 - 0.0% Fiscal Disparities 32,479 - - Personal Property Tax 16,558 Forfieted Tax Sale Apportionmt - Rent Credit - Penalties and Interest -Taxes 1,768 - - Property Taxes 4,207,227 - 4,355,050 4,390,000 34,950 0.8% Beer & Liquor Licenses 7,160 525 7,000 7,000 - 0.0% Cigarette Licenses 1,375 155 400 400 0.0% Garbage Haulers Licenses 1,110 1,095 1,100 1,100 - 0.0% Other Business License/Permit 7,352 9,300 5,400 6,500 1,100 20.4% Dog Licenses 1,445 100 - - - N/A Total Licenses 18,442 11,175 13,900 15,000 1,100 7.9% Building Permits 486,818 372,193 371,000 400,000 29,000 7.8% Zoning Permit 1,150 900 1,750 1,750 - 0.0% Mechanical/Septic/Other 76,833 77,929 55,000 55,000 0.0% Plumbing Permit 29,979 28,702 25,000 25,000 - 0.0% Total Permits 594,780 479,724 452,750 481,750 29,000 6.4% Federal Grant -other - - - - - N/A Market Value Credit 635 - - - N/A Police State Aid 223,228 - 200,000 220,000 20,000 10.0% Police Training Reimbursement 12,749 27,753 23,000 23,000 - 0.0% PERA State Aid 7,219 3,610 7,220 7,220 - 0.0% State Grant -other 16,915 12,671 10,000 20,000 10,000 100.0% Total Intergovernmental 260,747 44,033 240,220 270,220 30,000 12.5% Administrative Charges for Svc 69,000 34,500 80,000 245,170 165,170 206.5% General Taxable Sales/Service 799 466 1,000 1,000 - 0.0% Assessments searches 150 200 300 300 0.0% Plan Check/Site Exam Fees 302,155 237,146 190,000 190,000 - 0.0% Cond Use-Variance-Dev Fees 45,345 19,005 10,000 17,000 7,000 70.0% Engineering & Legal Fees 91,341 56,249 40,000 40,000 - 0.0% Bldg Permits -mail in fees 930 320 700 700 - 0.0% On-site Septic Program fees 44,738 45,000 44,500 44,750 250 0.6% Coop Agreement -public works 385 1,241 3,000 3,000 - 0.0% InterDepartmental Services -PW - - - - - N/A Off Leash Annual Pass 16,545 13,638 10,000 12,000 2,000 20.0% Total Gen Govt Service Charges 571,388 407,764 379,500 553,920 174,420 46.0% Coop Agreement -inspection 18,749 3,990 20,000 20,000 - 0.0% Coop Agreement -police 2,297,108 2,119,980 2,308,830 2,370,830 62,000 2.7% Police Special Services 98,068 93,653 80,000 90,000 10,000 12.5% False Alarm Fees 500 300 2,000 2,000 - 0.0% Police Reports 579 638 850 850 0.0% Police Reserve Receipts - - 300 300 - 0.0% Total Public Safety Service Charges 2,415,004 2,218,561 2,411,980 2,483,980 72,000 3.0% Other Fines - - - - - N/A Court Fines 67,149 44,427 80,000 80,000 0.0% Drug Task Force - - - - N/A Dog Impound Fees 60 140 100 100 0.0% Total Fines and Forfeits 67,209 44,567 80,100 80,100 0.0% Interest on investments 44,907 - 54,000 95,910 41,910 77.6% Interest -NOW account 568 298 500 500 - 0.0% Total Investment Revenue 45,475 298 54,500 96,410 41,910 76.9% Green Fees 124,953 96,066 110,000 110,000 - 0.0% Rental -Golf carts & Club 49,972 39,798 49,000 49,000 0.0% Beer Sales 9,704 8,494 8,000 8,000 0.0% Pop Sales - - - - N/A Concessions -taxable 6,072 4,137 6,000 6,000 0.0% Golf Ball Sales (11) - - - N/A Pro Shop -taxable 2,681 1,775 3,000 3,000 0.0% Pro Shop -nontaxable 303 242 - - N/A Other Golf Course Receipts 1,775 591 N/A Cash Over/Short - (4) - - N/A Total G Course Receipts 195,448 151,099 176,000 176,000 - % aolf Utili iYy o Otrono - 2019 Budget 1,750 1,980 1,500 2,000 500 30.0 Page z3.3% City of Orono 2019 Revenue Budget Summary City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 22 Percentage 2017 Y -T -D 2018 2019 Increase Increase Revenue Source Actual Aug 31,2018 Budget Budget (Decrease) (Decrease) Miscellaneous Revenue 28,940 349 3,000 3,000 0.0% Rent Income 4,950 4,050 5,400 5,400 0.0% Contributions & donations - 2,515 - - N/A Refunds & Reimbursements 3,958 19,350 500 500 0.0% Sale of Equipment 38,738 21,597 15,000 15,000 0.0% Filing fees-elections/plats 3,000 1,056 4,000 4,000 - 0.0% Total Miscellaneous Revenue 81,335 50,897 29,400 29,900 500 1.7% Total Revenue 8,457,054 3,408,117 8,193,400 8,577,280 383,880 4.7% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 22 Recreation Fees 2% General Govt Service Charges 6% 2019 General Fund Revenue Taxes 51% Intergovernment a l Reve n u e 3% Public Safety Charges 29% Permits 6% Fines and Foreits 1% Other Revenue 2% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 23 City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 24 Personal Services Supplies & Maintenance Insurances Professional Services Other Expenses Capital Outlay Transfers to Other Funds Contingencies Purchases for Resale Total City of Orono 2019 General Fund Budget Major Expenditure Categories City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 25 2019 Dollar 2017 Y -T -D 2018 Mgr Increase Increase Actual Oct 31,2018 BudgetRecommd (Decrease) (Decrease) 5,044,050 4,216,054 5,374,087 5,469,740 95,653 1.78% 553,789 535,252 637,130 625,110 (12,020) -1.89% 99,220 74,279 98,270 122,810 24,540 24.97% 1,156,098 801,222 1,069,381 1,287,000 217,619 20.35% 394,898 346,015 420,633 374,720 (45,913) -10.92% 203,497 143,341 200,000 184,000 (16,000) -8.00% 927,281 - 380,000 400,000 20,000 5.26% 57,924 - - 100,000 100,000 N/A 11,220 8,909 13,900 13,900 - 0.00% 8,447,977 6,125,071 8,193,401 8,577,280 383,879 4.69% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 25 Personal Services 64% 2019 General Fund Major Expenditure Categories Insurances 2% Expenses 4% Capital Outlay 2% "ransfers to Other Funds 5% >rofessional Services 15% Attachment E - Expenditure Category Graph City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 26 Mayor & Council Administration Elections Assessing Finance Law/Legal Services Central Services Human Services Police Fire Protection Services Building & Zoning Engineering Street Maintenance Parks Golf Course Special Services Special Projects -Contingencies Transfers to Other Funds Total General Fund Expenditures City of Orono 2019 General Fund Budget Departmental Budgets City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 27 2019 Dollar % 2017 2017 2018 Y -T -D Mgr Increase Increase Budget Actual Budget Oct 31,2018 Recommd (Decrease) (Decrease) 85,150 85,898 85,165 71,162 34,030 (51,135) -60.04% 297,150 318,443 324,184 266,146 434,470 110,286 34.02% 3,160 2,393 25,552 8,776 7,160 (18,392) -71.98% 180,000 176,166 182,000 106,167 185,000 3,000 1.65% 323,670 300,229 331,926 260,689 273,050 (58,876) -17.74% 104,000 120,115 112,000 91,752 129,000 17,000 15.18% 265,900 296,496 258,800 271,294 294,890 36,090 13.95% 12,400 11,099 12,400 12,125 12,400 - 0.00% 4,236,760 4,041,833 4,369,035 3,278,060 4,519,170 150,135 3.44% 397,000 400,547 390,000 292,024 402,100 12,100 3.10% 762,470 724,102 739,729 555,068 695,910 (43,819) -5.92% 20,000 54,476 15,000 13,342 20,000 5,000 33.33% 499,825 486,297 525,893 451,664 513,180 (12,713) -2.42% 116,469 119,627 173,136 144,166 218,440 45,304 26.17% 172,670 184,709 172,831 184,016 212,730 39,899 23.09% 95,750 138,345 95,750 118,620 125,750 30,000 31.33% 40,990 57,924 - - 100,000 100,000 N/A 375,000 926,642 380,000 - 400,000 20,000 5.26% 7,988,364 8,445,340 8,193,401 6,125,071 8,577,280 383,879 4.69% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 27 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY TR) SPECIAL GOLF COURSE 3% STREET MAINTI 6% 2019 General Fund Budget POLICE BUILDING & ZONING 8% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 28 General Fund Special Revenue Funds Park Drug & Felony Forfieture Senior Housing - TIF Capital Projects Funds PIR Fund IEO Fund MSA Fund PMP Fund Community Investment Police Infrastructure Debt Service Funds 2010 Improvement Bonds 2014 Improvement Bonds 2016 Refunding Bonds TOTAL GOVT FUNDS Enterprise Funds Water Operating Sewer Operating Recycling Operating Storm Water Operating Cable Operating TOTAL ALL FUNDS 132,725 165,300 412,975 - 143,138 - City of Orono - 134,225 100,000 409,938 165,000 578,975 5,712,450 10,000 496,750 1,013,358 3,037,900 176,000 80,100 121,410 65,400 565,000 11,278,368 Combined Summary of Revenues & Other Financing Sources - - - 671,550 - - 10,000 - - 681,550 For 2019 35,000 20,000 1,427,010 110,290 - 29,500 139,790 281,160 - 15,000 Transfers Total Special Licenses & Inter- Charges for Recreation Fines & Interest Misc. From Revenues and Property Tax Assessments Permits Governmental Services Charges Forfeits Income Revenue Other Funds Transfers In 4,380,000 10,000 496,750 270,220 3,037,900 176,000 80,100 96,410 29,900 8,577,280 - - - - - - 5,000 5,500 10,500 - - 1,000 25,000 26,000 77,000 - - 77,000 - 5,000 - 5,000 - 5,000 5,000 300,000 310,000 - 600,000 - - - 600,000 544,450 - - 544,450 - 5,000 5,000 132,725 165,300 412,975 - 143,138 - 1,500 1,500 1,000 - 134,225 100,000 409,938 165,000 578,975 5,712,450 10,000 496,750 1,013,358 3,037,900 176,000 80,100 121,410 65,400 565,000 11,278,368 - - - - 671,550 - - 10,000 - - 681,550 1,372,010 35,000 20,000 1,427,010 110,290 - 29,500 139,790 281,160 - 15,000 - 296,160 76,000 1,000 77,000 5,712,450 10,000 496,750 1,013,358 5,548,910 176,000 80,100 182,410 114,900 565,000 13,899,877 City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 29 Enterprise Funds City of Orono 874,710 474,855 80,000 55,000 1,484,565 Sewer Operating 1,624,175 804,068 - Combined Summary of Expenditures & Other Financing Uses Recycling Operating 134,530 - - 134,530 Storm Water Operating 356,810 For 2019 1,065,185 Cable Operating 67,030 - 67,030 TOTAL ALL FUNDS 1,370,000 5,433,180 533,180 3,057,255 4,565,622 431,170 1,240,394 303,800 565,000 17,499,601 Total Expend General Public Public Enterprise Capital Park & Debt Other Transfers To and Government &feety Works Operations Outlay Recreation Service Recycling Ex end Other Funds Transfers Out General Fund 1,370,000 5,433,180 533,180 184,000 431,170 225,750 400,000 8,577,280 Special Revenue Funds Park - - - 339,500 - - - 339,500 Drug & Felony Forfieture 20,000 - 20,000 Senior Housing - TIF - 60,000 60,000 Capital Projects Funds PIR Fund 20,305 - 20,305 IEO Fund 883,224 883,224 MSA Fund 75,000 75,000 PMP Fund 1,056,295 1,056,295 Community Investment Fund - - Police Infrastucture Fund - Debt Service Funds 2010 Improvement Bonds 264,319 6,300 270,619 2014 Improvement Bonds 386,325 6,300 392,625 2016 Refunding Bonds 509,750 5,450 - 515,200 TOTAL GOVT FUNDS 1,370,000 5,433,180 533,180 2,578,324 431,170 1,160,394 303,800 400,000 12,210,048 Enterprise Funds Water Operating 874,710 474,855 80,000 55,000 1,484,565 Sewer Operating 1,624,175 804,068 - 110,000 2,538,243 Recycling Operating 134,530 - - 134,530 Storm Water Operating 356,810 708,375 1,065,185 Cable Operating 67,030 - 67,030 TOTAL ALL FUNDS 1,370,000 5,433,180 533,180 3,057,255 4,565,622 431,170 1,240,394 303,800 565,000 17,499,601 City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 30 City of Orono Report of Outstanding Indebtedness As of December 31, 2018 City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 31 Fund 321 Fund 322 Fund 323 2010 2014 2016 Total Imp/Ref Imp/Ref Ref All Issues Bond Type: Bonds Outstanding 1/1/18 2,045,000 3,980,000 2,680,000 8,705,000 Bonds Issued 0 0 0 0 Bonds Paid or Refunded -200,000 -330,000 -210,000 -740,000 Bonds Outstanding 12/31/18 1,845,000 3,650,000 2,470,000 7,965,000 Anticipated Isuances 2019 0 0 0 0 Payments Due 2019 -205,000 -300,000 -465,000 -970,000 Projected Outstanding 2019 1,640,000 3,350,000 2,005,000 6,995,000 City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 31 Debt Issue 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2010 MSA, PMP, Refunding Tax Levy 132,725 134,825 131,520 133,325 134,530 130,000 130,725 MSA Funds 141,488 143,113 139,663 141,063 142,000 137,469 137,688 26,985 274,213 277,938 271,183 274,388 276,530 267,469 268,413 26,985 2014 Garage, Water, Refunding Tax Levy 165,300 162,900 166,700 161,000 282,000 277,000 277,000 278,857 278,000 278,002 Transfers - Contract Revenue 100,000 100,000 60,000 - - - - - - - Water Fund - Portion 102,030 100,430 102,180 101,830 100,430 98,570 101,550 99,350 101,920 99,310 101,500 367,330 363,330 328,880 262,830 382,430 375,570 378,550 378,207 379,920 377,312 101,500 2016 GO Refunding Bonds Tax levy 412,975 413,275 412,780 416,675 Transfer - Water 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 Transfer - Sewer 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 577,975 578,275 577,780 581,675 Current Debt Service Sources 641,543 641,268 600,063 537,218 658,960 643,039 646,963 405,192 379,920 377,312 101,500 Total Levy Required 711,000 711,000 711,000 711,000 416,530 407,000 407,725 278,857 278,000 278,002 - Total Transfers & Water Fund 367,030 365,430 327,180 266,830 100,430 98,570 101,550 99,350 101,920 99,310 101,500 Total MSA 141,488 143,113 139,663 141,063 142,000 137,469 137,688 26,985 - - - Total 1,219,518 1,219,543 1,177,843 1,118,893 658,960 643,039 646,963 405,192 379,920 377,312 101,500 City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 32 City of Orono Summary of Fund Balances* *Balance of Enterprise Funds reflects actual cash balance, not total Fund balance Debt Service Actual Estimated Estimated 2005 HRA Public Projects 2017 2018 2019 General Fund $4,308,487 $3,808,488 $3,808,487 Special Revenue Funds $0 $0 $0 Park Fund $761,536 $797,067 $468,067 Drug & Felony Forfeiture $295,639 $328,304 $334,304 Senior Housing TIF Fund $76,413 $74,856 $91,856 Affordable Housing Fund $132,379 $132,379 $132,379 Lurton Park Fund -$6,956 -$32,374 -$32,374 Employee Development $21,640 $21,640 $21,640 Golf Course Fund $266 $266 $266 Special Revenue Funds $1,280,918 $1,322,138 $1,016,138 Debt Service $2,104,345 $1,669,269 $1,613,963 2005 HRA Public Projects $44,419 $0 $0 2008 Street Reconstruction $87,666 $0 $0 2009 Improvement $0 $0 $0 2010 MSA/PMP/Refunding $684,333 $536,530 $400,136 2014 GO/Water/Abatment $977,678 $707,444 $724,757 2016 GO Imp Refunding $310,248 $425,295 $489,070 Debt Service $2,104,345 $1,669,269 $1,613,963 Enterprise Funds Capital Projects $899,121 $774,118 $215,890 MSA Fund -$1,050,959 $0 $0 Improvement Eqpt Outlay $1,177,742 $839,714 $266,490 PIR Fund $1,284,028 $1,244,883 $1,229,579 Pavement Mgmt $377,417 $462,233 -$49,612 Community Investment $658,854 $544,258 $549,258 Police Capital Project Fund $24,883 $24,883 $0 Capital Projects $2,471,966 $3,115,971 $1,995,715 Enterprise Funds Water Operating $899,121 $774,118 $215,890 Sewer Operating $2,778,844 $2,585,816 $1,839,932 Storm Water Operating $1,640,264 $1,763,437 $1,047,912 Recycling Operating $50,540 $66,850 $72,110 Cable Television $152,812 $179,381 $189,351 Enterprise Funds $5,521,581 $5,369,602 $3,365,195 GRAND TOTAL $15,687,296 $15,285,469 $11,799,499 City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 33 City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 34 City of Orono Changes in Fund Balance General Fund Budget Actual Revenues Over (Under) Budgeted Revenues Expenditures Actual Budget Actual Expenditures Over (Under) Budgeted Expenditures Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfers Out: To Equipment Outlay Fund Transfers Out: To Pavement Management Transfers Out: To MSA Transfers Out: To 2014 Debt Service Transfers Out: To 2016 Debt Service In: From Capital Lease Proceeds Sale of Land and Equipment Excess (Deficiency) of Revenue Over Expenditures Fund Balance - Beginning of Year Fund Balance - End of Year Fund Balance Components Nonspendable - Prepaids Nonspendable - Inventory Unassigned Total Fund Balance Actual Estimated Estimated 2017 2018 2019 $ 8,467,198 $ 8,193,400 $ 8,577,280 7,987,860 8,193,400 8,577,280 479,338 - - $ 7,560,072 $ 7,828,400 $ 8,027,280 7,988,364 7,828,400 8,027,280 (428,292) 0 - (270,000) (255,000) (300,000) (531,642) - - (125,000) (125,000) (100,000) (165,000) 38,738 15,000 15,000 19,221 - - 4,388,096 4,425,148 4,425,148 $ 4,425,148 $ 4,425,148 $ 4,425,148 9,809 20,000 20,000 2,410 5,000 5,000 4,412,929 4,400,148 4,400,148 $ 4,425,148 $ 4,425,149 $ 4,425,148 City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 35 Revenues Actual Budget Actual Revenues Over (Under) Budgeted Revenues Expenditures Actual Budget Actual Expenditures Over (Under) Budgeted Expenditures Transfers In (Out) From Community Investment Fund Excess (Deficiency) of Revenue Over Expenditures Fund Balance - Beginning of Year Fund Balance - End of Year Fund Balance Components Restricted for Land Acquisition and Park Development Total Fund Balance City of Orono Changes in Fund Balance Special Revenue Funds Park Fund Actual Estimated Estimated 2017 2018 2019 15,758 - - $ 44,380 44,380 - - (28,622) - - 790,678 762,057 762,057 762,057 762,057 762,057 762,057 762,057 762,057 City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 36 City of Orono Changes in Fund Balance Special Revenue Funds Drug and Felony Forfieture Fund Actual Estimated 2017 2018 Revenues Actual $ 33,901 $ - Budget - - Actual Revenues Over (Under) Budgeted Revenues 33,901 - Expenditures Actual Q -7^" Q Budget Actual Expenditures Over (Under) Budgeted Expenditures Transfers In (Out) Excess (Deficiency) of Revenue Over Expenditures Fund Balance - Beginning of Year Fund Balance - End of Year Fund Balance Components Restricted for Crime Prevention Total Fund Balance Estimated 2019 Q d, 7,437 - - 26,464 - - 269,362 295,826 295,826 295,826 295,826 295,826 295,826 295,826 295,826 295,826 295,826 295,826 City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 37 Revenues Actual Budget Actual Revenues Over (Under) Budgeted Revenues Expenditures Actual Budget Actual Expenditures Over (Under) Budgeted Expenditures Transfers In (Out) Excess (Deficiency) of Revenue Over Expenditures Fund Balance - Beginning of Year Fund Balance - End of Year Fund Balance Components Restricted for Senior Housing Total Fund Balance City of Orono Changes in Fund Balance Special Revenue Funds Senior Housing TIF Actual Estimated Estimated 2017 2018 2019 73,272 - - $ 42,293 42,293 - - 30,979 - - 45,458 76,437 76,437 76,437 76,437 76,437 76,437 76,437 76,437 City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 38 City of Orono Changes in Fund Balance Special Revenue Funds Affordable Housing Fund Actual Estimated 2017 2018 Revenues Actual $ 1,243 Budget - Actual Revenues Over (Under) Budgeted Revenues 1,243 Expenditures Actual $ - Budget - Actual Expenditures Over (Under) Budgeted Expenditures - Transfers In (Out) Excess (Deficiency) of Revenue Over Expenditures 1,243 Fund Balance - Beginning of Year 131,224 Fund Balance - End of Year 132,467 Fund Balance Components Restricted for Affordable Housing 132,467 Total Fund Balance 132,467 132,467 132,467 Estimated 2019 132,467 132,467 City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 39 Revenues Actual Budget Actual Revenues Over (Under) Budgeted Revenues Expenditures Actual Budget Actual Expenditures Over (Under) Budgeted Expenditures Transfers In (Out) Transfer Out - Big Island Fund Excess (Deficiency) of Revenue Over Expenditures Fund Balance - Beginning of Year Fund Balance - End of Year Fund Balance Components Restricted for Park Dev/Maintanence Total Fund Balance City of Orono Changes in Fund Balance Special Revenue Funds Lurton Park Fund Actual Estimated Estimated 2017 2018 2019 $ 319 $ - $ - 319 - - Cn f1C4 Q` 70 707 50,951 28,782 - (50,632) (28,782) - 43,702 (6,930) (35,713) (6,930) (35,713) (35,713) (6,930) (35,713) (35,713) (6,930) (35,713) (35,713) City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 40 Estimated 2018 21,654 Estimated 2019 21,654 21,654 21,654 21,654 21,654 City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 41 City of Orono Changes in Fund Balance Special Revenue Funds Employee Development Actual 2017 Revenues Actual $ 203 Budget - Actual Revenues Over (Under) Budgeted Revenues 203 Expenditures Actual $ - Budget - Actual Expenditures Over (Under) Budgeted Expenditures - Transfers In (Out) Transfer In: General Fund - Excess (Deficiency) of Revenue Over Expenditures 203 Fund Balance - Beginning of Year 21,451 Fund Balance - End of Year 21,654 Fund Balance Components Assigned for Employee Development 21,654 Total Fund Balance 21,654 Estimated 2018 21,654 Estimated 2019 21,654 21,654 21,654 21,654 21,654 City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 41 City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 42 City of Orono Changes in Fund Balance Special Revenue Funds Golf Course Fund Actual Estimated Estimated 2017 2018 2019 Revenues Actual $ 9 $ - $ - Budget - - - Actual Revenues Over (Under) Budgeted Revenues 9 - - Expenditures Actual $ 2,131 - Budget - - - Actual Expenditures Over (Under) Budgeted Expenditures 2,131 - - Transfers In (Out) Transfer In: General Fund - - - Excess (Deficiency) of Revenue Over Expenditures (2,122) - - Fund Balance - Beginning of Year 2,389 267 267 Fund Balance - End of Year 267 267 267 Fund Balance Components Assigned for Golf Course Improvements 267 267 267 Total Fund Balance 267 267 267 City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 42 City of Orono Changes in Fund Balance Debt Service Funds 2005 HRA Public Projects Bond - Big Island Actual Estimated 2017 2018 Revenues Actual 4z d11 ( _ Budget Actual Revenues Over (Under) Budgeted Revenues Expenditures Actual Budget Actual Expenditures Over (Under) Budgeted Expenditures Other Financing Sources (Uses) Bond Proceeds Transfer Out Excess (Deficiency) of Revenue Over Expenditures Fund Balance - Beginning of Year Fund Balance - End of Year Fund Balance Components Assigned for Debt Service Total Fund Balance 411 411 44,449 44,449 Estimated 2019 ( _ 44,449 44,449 44,449 44,449 44,449 City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 43 Revenues tsudget Actual Revenues Over (Under) Budgeted Revenues Expenditures Actual Budget Actual Expenditures Over (Under) Budgeted Expenditures Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfer from Utility Funds Excess (Deficiency) of Revenue Over Expenditures Fund Balance - Beginning of Year Fund Balance - End of Year Fund Balance Components Assigned for Debt Service Total Fund Balance City of Orono Changes in Fund Balance Debt Service Funds 2008 Street Reconstruction Actual Estimated Estimated 2017 2018 2019 1 R..C;S T, - T - 1,655 - - 199 WR R74 - - 2,978,874 - - (2,977,219) - - 3,065,022 87,803 87,803 87,803 87,803 87,803 87,803 87,803 87,803 87,803 87,803 87,803 City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 44 Revenues Actual Budget Actual Revenues Over (Under) Budgeted Revenues Expenditures Actual Budget Actual Expenditures Over (Under) Budgeted Expenditures Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfer from Sewer Operating Transfer from 1999 Improvement Transfer from 2000 Improvement Excess (Deficiency) of Revenue Over Expenditures Fund Balance - Beginning of Year Fund Balance - End of Year Fund Balance Components Assigned for Debt Service Total Fund Balance City of Orono Changes in Fund Balance Debt Service Funds 2009 Improvement Refunding Actual Estimated 2017 2018 G 16 $ 76,957 76,957 (76,941) 76,943 2 2 Estimated 2019 2 2 2 2 2 2 City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 45 City of Orono Changes in Fund Balance Debt Service Funds 2010 MSA/PMP/Refunding Bonds Actual Estimated 2017 2018 Revenues Actual $ 277,227 $ 131,970 Budget 134,960 131,970 Actual Revenues Over (Under) Budgeted Revenues Expenditures Actual Budget Actual Expenditures Over (Under) Budgeted Expenditures Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfer in: Community Investment Excess (Deficiency) of Revenue Over Expenditures Fund Balance - Beginning of Year Fund Balance - End of Year Fund Balance Components Assigned for Debt Service Total Fund Balance $ 266,769 272,619 (5,850) 10,459 674,193 684,651 $ 271,694 271,694 (139, 724) 684,651 544,927 Estimated 2019 $ 134,225 134,225 $ 270,619 270,619 (136,394) 544,927 408,533 408,533 408,533 City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 46 City of Orono Changes in Fund Balance Debt Service Funds 2014 GO/Water/Abatement Bonds Actual Estimated 2017 2018 Revenues Actual $ 433,083 $ 285,651 Budget 574,638 285,651 Actual Revenues Over (Under) Budgeted Revenues (141,555) - Expenditures Actual $ 503,244 $ 429,225 Budget Actual Expenditures Over (Under) Budgeted Expenditures Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfer in: Community Investment Transfer in: General Fund Transfer in: Water Fund Excess (Deficiency) of Revenue Over Expenditures Fund Balance - Beginning of Year Fund Balance - End of Year Fund Balance Components Assigned for Debt Service Total Fund Balance (111,081) 125,000 923,147 977,986 977,986 977,986 429,225 125,000 (18,574) 977,986 959,412 959,412 959,412 Estimated 2019 $ 309,938 309,938 $ 392,625 392,625 100,000 959,412 976,725 976,725 976,725 City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 47 Revenues Actual Budget Actual Revenues Over (Under) Budgeted Revenues Expenditures Actual Budget Actual Expenditures Over (Under) Budgeted Expenditures Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfer in: Community Investment Transfer in: Water Fund Transfer in: Sewer Fund Excess (Deficiency) of Revenue Over Expenditures Fund Balance - Beginning of Year Fund Balance - End of Year Fund Balance Components Assigned for Debt Service Total Fund Balance City of Orono Changes in Fund Balance Debt Service Funds 2016 Refunding Bond Actual Estimated Estimated 2017 2018 2019 $ 183,553 $ 407,530 $ 413,975 193,830 407,530 413,975 (10,277) - - $ 38,268 $ 266,950 $ 515,200 38,270 266,950 515,200 (2) - - 55,000 55,000 55,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 310,286 305,580 63,775 - 310,286 615,866 310,286 615,866 679,641 310,286 615,866 679,641 310,286 615,866 679,641 City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 48 City of Orono Changes in Fund Balance Capital Project Funds Municipal State Aid Fund (MSA) City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 49 Actual Estimated Estimated Revenues 2017 2018 2019 Actual $ 544,988 $ 1,041,802 $ 3,665,724 Budget - - - Actual Revenues Over (Under) Budgeted Revenues 544,988 1,041,802 3,665,724 Expenditures Actual $ 753,088 $ 3,656,567 $ - Budget - - - Actual Expenditures Over (Under) Budgeted Expenditures 753,088 3,656,567 - Other Financing Sources (Uses) Bond Proceeds - - - Transfer In: General Fund - - Transfer In: Storm Water Excess (deficiency) of revenue Over Expenditures (208,100) (2,614,765) 3,665,724 Fund Balance Beginning of Year (842,859) (1,050,959) (3,665,724) Fund Balance End of Year (1,050,959) (3,665,724) (0) Fund Balance Components Restricted to State Aid Road Construction (1,050,959) (3,665,724) (0) Total Fund Balance (1,050,959) (3,665,724) (0) City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 49 City of Orono Changes in Fund Balance Capital Project Funds Improvement Equipment Outlay City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 50 Actual Estimated Estimated Revenues 2017 2018 2019 Actual $ 10,873 $ 4,585 $ 5,000 Budget - - - Actual Revenues Over (Under) Budgeted Revenues 10,873 4,585 5,000 Expenditures Actual $ 275,451 $ 863,911 $ 573,000 Budget - - - Actual Expenditures Over (Under) Budgeted Expenditures 275,451 863,911 573,000 Transfers In (Out) From Improvement Equipment Outlay - - - From General Fund 240,000 270,000 300,000 Excess (deficiency) of revenue over expenditures (24,578) (589,326) (268,000) Fund Balance Beginning of Year 1,173,062 1,148,483 559,157 Fund Balance End of Year 1,148,483 559,157 291,157 Fund Balance Components Assigned for Long Lake Fire Equipment 689,651 370,833 455,833 Assigned for Capital Equipment Purchase: 458,832 188,324 (164,676) Total Fund Balance 1,148,483 559,157 291,157 The Improvement Equipmpent Outlay Construction Fund was created in 2010. The initial funding was provided by the closing of the Improvement Equipment Outlay Special Revenue Fund City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 50 City of Orono Changes in Fund Balance Capital Project Funds Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund (PIR) Revenues Actual Budget Actual Revenues Over (Under) Budgeted Revenues Expenditures Actual Budget Actual Expenditures Over (Under) Budgeted Expenditures Transfers In (Out) Transfer From General Fund Transfer To: 2014 Debt Service Excess (deficiency) of revenue over expenditures Fund Balance Beginning of Year Fund Balance End of Year Actual Estimated Estimated 2017 2018 2019 $ 54,329 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 49,329 - - $ 155,657 $ - $ 20,305 20,000 - 20,305 135,657 - - (101,327) 5,000 (15,305) 846,053 744,726 749,726 744,726 749,726 734,421 City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 51 City of Orono Changes in Fund Balance Capital Project Funds Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund (PIR) Fund Balance Components Assigned for: Police Equipment Purchases 216,654 200,000 Emergency Contingencies ** 325,000 325,000 Future Construction Projects 203,072 224,726 Total Fund Balance 100,000 325,000 309,421 744,726 749,726 734,421 ** The emergency contingency account is considered fully funded at $325,000. The City established the road/bridge account in 1987 with resolution #2210. The funds came from interest earned on MSA construction monies which were not then needed for MSA projects. Expenditures from the account are restricted to road and bridge projects, as approved by Council. The City established the emergency contingency account with resolution #941, and amended with resolution #2669 in 1989. The account is restricted for use in a catastrophic situation or for temporary funding in the form of short-term loans to other accounts or funds. City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 52 City of Orono Changes in Fund Balance Capital Project Funds Pavement Management Fund (PMP) Revenues Actual Budget Actual Revenues Over (Under) Budgeted Revenues Expenditures Actual Budget Actual Expenditures Over (Under) Budgeted Expenditures Transfers In (Out) Transfer From General Fund Transfer From Sewer Operating Transfer From Storm Water Operating Excess (deficiency) of revenue over expenditures Fund Balance Beginning of Year Fund Balance End of Year Fund Balance Components Restricted to Road Construction Total Fund Balance Actual Estimated Estimated 2017 2018 2019 $ 967,849 $ 383,000 $ 544,450 714,849 - - $ 803,469 $ 653,029 $1,056,295 121,992 - - 164,379 (270,029) (511,845) 213,208 377,588 107,559 377,588 107,559 (404,286) 377,588 107,559 (404,286) 377,588 107,559 (404,286) City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 53 City of Orono Changes in Fund Balance Capital Project Funds Community Investment Fund The Community Investment Special Revenue Fund was closed in 2010 Balance transferred to the Community Investment Construction Fund Estimated 2019 $ 5,000 5,000 5,000 549,337 554,337 City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 54 Actual Estimated 2017 2018 Revenues Actual $ 6,472 $ 5,000 Budget 5,000 5,000 Actual Revenues Over (Under) Budgeted Revenues 1,472 - Expenditures Actual $ 91,359 $ 114,972 Budget 306,000 114,300 Actual Expenditures Over (Under) Budgeted Expenditures (214,641) 672 Transfers In (Out) From General Fund To Debt Service Fund - - To Pavement Management Fund From Com Investment Fund - - Excess (Deficiency) of Revenue Over Expenditures (84,886) (109,972) Fund Balance - Beginning of Year 744,195 659,309 Fund Balance - End of Year 659,309 549,337 The Community Investment Special Revenue Fund was closed in 2010 Balance transferred to the Community Investment Construction Fund Estimated 2019 $ 5,000 5,000 5,000 549,337 554,337 City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 54 City of Orono Changes in Fund Balance Capital Project Funds Police Capital Project Fund Actual 2017 Revenues Actual Budget Actual Revenues Over (Under) Budgeted Revenues Expenditures Actual Budget Actual Expenditures Over (Under) Budgeted Expenditures Transfers In (Out) From 2014 Bond Fund Bond Proceeds Excess (Deficiency) of Revenue Over Expenditures Fund Balance - Beginning of Year Fund Balance - End of Year 24,883 24,883 Estimated 2018 24,883 24,883 Estimated 2019 24,883 24,883 City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 55 City of Orono Changes in Retained Earnings Enterprise Funds Water Fund Capital Outlays (423,400) Cash Balance at December 31 899,121 Capital outlay items reduce cash, but are not expenditures. (428,700) (474,855) 490,110 (167,905) City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 56 Actual Estimated Estimated 2017 2018 2019 Operating Revenues Actual $ 748,209 $ 651,300 $ 681,550 Budget 720,000 651,300 681,550 Actual Revenues Over (Under) Budgeted Revenues 28,209 - - Operating Expenditures Actual $ 672,153 $ 691,611 $ 929,710 Budget 664,630 691,611 929,710 Actual Expenditures Over (Under) Budgeted Expenditures 7,523 - - Excess (Deficiency) of Operating Revenue Over Operating Expenditures 76,056 (40,311) (248,160) Non -Operating Revenues (Expenditures) Leases, Connections, Specials, Interest 21,036 20,000 20,000 Bond Proceeds - - - Interest Expense - - - Transfer out: Casco Point System (55,000) (55,000) (55,000) Excess (Deficiency) of Revenue Over Expenditures 42,092 (75,311) (283,160) Capital Outlays (423,400) Cash Balance at December 31 899,121 Capital outlay items reduce cash, but are not expenditures. (428,700) (474,855) 490,110 (167,905) City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 56 City of Orono Changes in Retained Earnings Enterprise Funds Sewer Fund City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 57 Actual Estimated Estimated 2017 2018 2019 Operating Revenues Actual $1,427,056 $ 1,505,000 $1,427,010 Budget 1,374,240 1,505,000 1,427,010 Actual Revenues Over (Under) Budgeted Revenues 52,816 - - Operating Expenditures Actual $1,429,055 $ 1,630,240 $1,844,175 Budget 1,589,830 1,630,240 1,844,175 Actual Expenditures Over (Under) Budgeted Expenditures (160,775) - - Excess (Deficiency) of Operating Revenue Over Operating Expenditures (1,999) (125,240) (417,165) Non -Operating Revenues (Expenditures) Connections, Specials, Interest 55,416 10,000 10,000 Interest Expense - - - Transfer Out: Casco Point System (110,000) (110,000) (110,000) Transfer Out: Debt Support - - - Excess (Deficiency) of Revenue Over Expenditures (56,583) (225,240) (517,165) Capital Outlay (1,140,520) (972,194) (804,068) Cash Balance at December 31 2,281,268 1,343,835 282,602 Capital outlay items reduce cash, but are not expenditures. City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 57 City of Orono Changes in Retained Earnings Enterprise Funds Storm Water Fund Over Expenditures 127,143 Capital Outlay (271,500) Cash Balance at December 31 1,640,264 Capital outlay items reduce cash, but are not expenditures. 1,358,868 (308,080) 2,726,052 1,085,200 (708,375) 3,137,877 City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 58 Actual Estimated Estimated 2017 2018 2019 Operating Revenues Actual $ 308,938 $ 1,505,000 $1,427,010 Budget 1,374,240 1,505,000 1,427,010 Actual Revenues Over (Under) Budgeted Revenues (1,065,302) - - Operating Expenditures Actual $ 196,795 $ 161,132 $ 356,810 Budget 151,550 161,132 356,810 Actual Expenditures Over (Under) Budgeted Expenditures 45,245 - - Excess (Deficiency) of Operating Revenue Over Operating Expenditures 112,143 1,343,868 1,070,200 Non -Operating Revenues (Expenditures) Connection Fees, Interest 15,000 15,000 15,000 Transfers Out: PMP - - Grants - - - Excess (Deficiency) of Revenue Over Expenditures 127,143 Capital Outlay (271,500) Cash Balance at December 31 1,640,264 Capital outlay items reduce cash, but are not expenditures. 1,358,868 (308,080) 2,726,052 1,085,200 (708,375) 3,137,877 City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 58 City of Orono Changes in Retained Earnings Enterprise Funds Recycling City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 59 Actual Estimated Estimated 2017 2018 2019 Operating Revenues Actual $ 148,852 $ 113,100 $ 110,290 Budget 237,500 113,100 110,290 Actual Revenues Over (Under) Budgeted Revenues (88,648) - - Operating Expenditures Actual $ 126,333 $ 130,150 $ 134,530 Budget 125,000 130,150 134,530 Actual Expenditures Over (Under) Budgeted Expenditures 1,333 - - Excess (Deficiency) of Operating Revenue Over Operating Expenditures 22,518 (17,050) (24,240) Non -Operating Revenues (Expenditures) Grants 29,500 29,500 29,500 Other Non -Operating - - - Excess (Deficiency) of Revenue Over Expenditures 52,018 12,450 5,260 Capital Outlay - - - Cash Balance at December 31 50,540 62,990 68,250 Capital outlay items reduce cash, but are not expenditures. City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 59 City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 60 2019 General Fund Operating Budget Departmental Summary Mayor & Council 41110 Increase (Decrease) 0.13% -81.11% 50.00% City Council Total 83,440 85,898 85,165 71,162 34,030 (51,135) -60.04% PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES: The City Council oversees the policies and procedures that govern the city in promoting the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of Orono. OPERATING COST ACTIVITIES: *Personal Services include the wages and employment taxes for City Council Representatives. *City-wide Memberships are as follows: Lake Minnetonka Conservation District League of Minnesota Cities Metro Cities *Other Expenses includes training and meeting expenses City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 61 2019 Dollar 2016 2017 2018 Y -T -D Mgr Increase Actual Actual Budget Oct 31, 2018 Recommd (Decrease) Personal Services 19,642 19,348 19,665 16,382 19,690 25 City Wide Memberships 62,198 64,621 64,000 53,933 12,090 (51,910) Other Expenses 1,599 1,928 1,500 847 2,250 750 Increase (Decrease) 0.13% -81.11% 50.00% City Council Total 83,440 85,898 85,165 71,162 34,030 (51,135) -60.04% PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES: The City Council oversees the policies and procedures that govern the city in promoting the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of Orono. OPERATING COST ACTIVITIES: *Personal Services include the wages and employment taxes for City Council Representatives. *City-wide Memberships are as follows: Lake Minnetonka Conservation District League of Minnesota Cities Metro Cities *Other Expenses includes training and meeting expenses City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 61 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES: The Administration Department includes the City Administrator who is responsible for meeting satatutory and legal obligations, implementing policy established by the City Council and ensuring the successful management of all city operations. In additior the City Administrator is responsible for overseeing the human resource function. The City Clerk and Administrative Staff are also included in the Administration Department and perform various function such a! customer service, general administrative duties, permits and licensing, elections, data practices, and record management OPERATING COST ACTIVITI ES: *Personal Services include the wages and employment taxes for the City Administrator and Administration Staff *Professional Services includes the city recorder for city council meetings. *Other Expenses includes training and development, memberships in professional organizations for the Administrative Staff, anc the City Administrator's car allowance. City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 62 2019 General Fund Operating Budget Departmental Summary Administration 41300 2019 Dollar 2016 2017 2018 Y -T -D Mgr Increase Increase Actual Actual Budget Oct 31, 2018 Recommd Decrease (Decrease) Personal Services 253,171 307,129 305,884 257,982 408,470 102,586 33.54% Supplies & Maintenance 44 183 300 207 300 0 0.00% Professional Serivices 5,245 5,623 6,000 3,577 12,500 6,500 108.33% Other Expenses 12,223 5,507 12,000 4,380 13,200 1,200 10.00% Administration Total 270,683 318,443 324,184 266,147 434,470 110,286 34.02% PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES: The Administration Department includes the City Administrator who is responsible for meeting satatutory and legal obligations, implementing policy established by the City Council and ensuring the successful management of all city operations. In additior the City Administrator is responsible for overseeing the human resource function. The City Clerk and Administrative Staff are also included in the Administration Department and perform various function such a! customer service, general administrative duties, permits and licensing, elections, data practices, and record management OPERATING COST ACTIVITI ES: *Personal Services include the wages and employment taxes for the City Administrator and Administration Staff *Professional Services includes the city recorder for city council meetings. *Other Expenses includes training and development, memberships in professional organizations for the Administrative Staff, anc the City Administrator's car allowance. City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 62 2019 General Fund Operating Budget Departmental Summary Elections 41410 2019 Dollar 2016 2017 2018 Y -T -D Mgr Increase Increase Actual Actual Budget Oct 31, 2018 Recommd (Decrease) (Decrease) Personal Services 12,414 0 17,152 7,021 1,160 (15,992) -93.24% Supplies & Maintenance 4,044 1,736 2,800 876 5,000 2,200 78.57% Other Expenses 2,266 657 5,600 880 1,000 (4,600) -82.14% Elections Total 18,725 2,393 25,552 8,776 7,160 (18,392) -71.98% PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES: The Elections Department administers all federal, state, county, and municipal elections held in the city. Temporary election judges are hired to provide the necessary staffing at polling locations, and for the operation of voting machines. The Administrative Staff provides supervision to the election judges as needed and maintains OPERATING COST ACTIVITI ES: *Personal Services are the wages for the temporary election judges. 2018 is an election year. *Other expenses include professional services, postage, travel expenses, advertising, building/equipment rental, training, meeting expenses and other miscellaneous expenses. City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 63 2019 General Fund Operating Budget Departmental Summary Assessing 41550 2019 Dollar 2016 2017 2018 Y-T-D Mgr Increase Increase Actual Actual Budget Oct 31, 2018 Recommd Decrease (Decrease) Assessing Contract 161,831 176,166 182,000 106,167 185,000 3,000 1.65% Assessing Total 161,831 176,166 182,000 106,167 185,000 3,000 1.65% PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES: The City maintains a renewable contract agreement with Hennepin County to provide Assessing services. City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 64 2019 General Fund Operating Budget Departmental Summary Finance Department 41500 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES The Finance Department oversees the City's financial operations, insurances, and employee benefits. It is responsible for preparing the budget document and annual report in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. OPERATING COST ACTIVITI ES: *Personal Services include the wages and employment taxes for the Finance Department Staff. Staff includes: Finance Director (90%), IT Manager (80%), Accountant and Payroll/Utility Billing Clerk (50%). *Other Expenses includes training and development, and memberships in professional organizations for the Finance Staff City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 65 2019 Dollar 2016 2017 2018 Y -T -D Mgr Increase Increase Actual Actual Budget Oct 31, 2018 Recommd Decrease (Decrease) Personal Services 314,695 299,624 326,526 256,662 262,750 (63,776) -19.53% Supplies & Maintenance 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Professional Services 0 0 0 0 4,900 4,900 N/A Other Expenses 3,448 605 5,400 4,027 5,400 0 0.00% Finance Total 318,143 300,229 331,926 260,689 273,050 (58,876) -17.74% PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES The Finance Department oversees the City's financial operations, insurances, and employee benefits. It is responsible for preparing the budget document and annual report in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. OPERATING COST ACTIVITI ES: *Personal Services include the wages and employment taxes for the Finance Department Staff. Staff includes: Finance Director (90%), IT Manager (80%), Accountant and Payroll/Utility Billing Clerk (50%). *Other Expenses includes training and development, and memberships in professional organizations for the Finance Staff City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 65 2019 General Fund Operating Budget Departmental Summary Law/Legal Services 41600 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES: The City maintains a renewable contract agreement with two local legal firms to provide legal services. The Legal Department provides professional representation and opinion on city services and operations. OPERATING COST ACTIVITIES: *Professional Services includes the costs associated with the contract with legal staff, prosecution costs, code enforcement, and jail charges. City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 66 2019 Dollar 2016 2017 2018 Y -T -D Mgr Increase Increase Actual Actual Budget Oct 31, 2018 Recommd Decrease (Decrease) Professional Services 112,918 120,115 112,000 91,752 129,000 17,000 15.18% Law/Legal Services Total 112,918 120,115 112,000 91,752 129,000 17,000 15.18% PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES: The City maintains a renewable contract agreement with two local legal firms to provide legal services. The Legal Department provides professional representation and opinion on city services and operations. OPERATING COST ACTIVITIES: *Professional Services includes the costs associated with the contract with legal staff, prosecution costs, code enforcement, and jail charges. City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 66 Central Services Total 268,437 296,496 258,800 271,294 294,890 36,090 13.95% PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES: The Central Services Department provides for those operating expenses that encompass all city departments. By consolidating these expenditures, the City can more accurately determine the effectiveness of the costs and benefits provided. The City maintains a renewable contract agreement with an outside janitorial service for general cleaning and upkeep of city facilities. The Central Services Department also pays for a portion of the costs OPERATING COST ACTIVITIES: *Supplies & Maintenance include the operating supplies and maintenance expenses on city equipment and facilities. *Other Expenses includes utilities, publishing costs, copier leases, and other miscellaneous charges related to city operations. *Insurance Expenses includes a portion of the City's general and liability insurance costs. *Professional Services includes annual audit expenses and fees associated with administering city benefit plans. City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 67 2019 General Fund Operating Budget Departmental Summary Central Services 41900 2019 Dollar 2016 2017 2018 Y -T -D Mgr Increase Increase Actual Actual Budget Oct 31, 2018 Recommd Decrease (Decrease) Supplies & Maintenance 90,681 113,169 93,000 115,065 60,500 (32,500) -34.95% Professional Services 46,501 39,421 38,000 37,370 89,000 51,000 134.21% Insurances 30,200 30,200 30,200 22,650 38,290 8,090 26.79% Other Expenses 101,054 113,706 97,600 96,208 107,100 9,500 9.73% Capital Outlay & Transfers 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Central Services Total 268,437 296,496 258,800 271,294 294,890 36,090 13.95% PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES: The Central Services Department provides for those operating expenses that encompass all city departments. By consolidating these expenditures, the City can more accurately determine the effectiveness of the costs and benefits provided. The City maintains a renewable contract agreement with an outside janitorial service for general cleaning and upkeep of city facilities. The Central Services Department also pays for a portion of the costs OPERATING COST ACTIVITIES: *Supplies & Maintenance include the operating supplies and maintenance expenses on city equipment and facilities. *Other Expenses includes utilities, publishing costs, copier leases, and other miscellaneous charges related to city operations. *Insurance Expenses includes a portion of the City's general and liability insurance costs. *Professional Services includes annual audit expenses and fees associated with administering city benefit plans. City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 67 2019 General Fund Operating Budget Departmental Summary Human Services 41800 2019 Dollar 2016 2017 2018 Y -T -D Mgr Increase Increase Actual Actual Budget Oct 31, 2018 Recommd Decrease Decrease Contributions 12,426 11,099 12,400 12,125 12,400 0 0.00% Human Services Total 12,426 11,099 12,400 12,125 12,400 0 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES: The Human Services Department is comprised of area organizations that provide equal opportunity in employment, housing, public services, and education. The City maintains an affiliation with these organizations to ensure a strong relationship witl- area communities and their citizens. OPERATING COST ACTIVITIES: *Contributions are the contributions made to Human Service Organizations in the Orono area. Organizations include The Gillespie Center 9,500 Orono Community Education 2,900 12,400 City of Orono - 2019 Budget 0.00 Page 68 Dollar % Increase Increase Decrease Decrease 99,446 2019 General Fund Operating Budget (8,500) -3.25% 76,989 56.76% Departmental Summary 29.09% (4,300) -3.16% (16,000) Police Department 42110 2019 2016 2017 2018 Y -T -D Mgr Actual Actual Budget Oct 31, 2018 Recommd Personal Services 3,223,019 3,366,031 3,581,214 2,739,713 3,680,660 Supplies & Maintenance 186,955 200,686 261,300 172,053 239,300 Professional Services 98,451 105,269 135,641 79,646 212,630 Insurances 55,000 55,000 55,000 41,250 71,000 Other Expenses 122,635 111,350 135,880 102,057 131,580 Capital Outlay 171,290 203,497 200,000 143,341 184,000 Dollar % Increase Increase Decrease Decrease 99,446 2.78% (8,500) -3.25% 76,989 56.76% 16,000 29.09% (4,300) -3.16% (16,000) -8.00% Police Total 3,857,350 4,041,833 4,369,035 3,278,060 4,519,170 163,635 3.75% PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES: The Police Department provides for the public safety within Orono and several surrounding communities. This is accomplished through preventive patrol, traffic enforcement, education, criminal investigation and prosecution. Through renewable contract agreements, the city provides police services to the communities of Spring Park, Minnetonka Beach, and Mound. Due to the nature of these cooperative agreements, the Police Department operates, and is budgeted for as a 'cost center'. This enables the City to accurately determine the portion of operating costs that pertain to each contract city. OPERATING COST ACTIVITIES: *Personal Services include the wages and employment taxes for the Police Department. Staff includes: Police Chief, Deputy Chief, Sergeant (4), Investigators (3), Patrol Officers (19), Community Service Officer, Office Manager, Administrative Assistant (2) *Supplies & Maintenance include the operating supplies and maintenance expenses on police equipment and facilities. *Other Expenses includes utilities, fuel, publishing costs, copier leases, and other miscellaneous charges related to police operations. *Insurance Expenses includes a portion of the City's general, liability, and auto insurance costs. *Professional Services includes the police records system, internet, animal care, and medical and psychological evaluations for new officers. City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 69 2019 General Fund Operating Budget Departmental Summary Fire Protection Services 42260 2019 Dollar 2016 2017 2018 Y -T -D Mgr Increase Increase Actual Actual Budget Oct 31, 2018 Recommd Decrease (Decrease) Professional Services 393,476 400,547 390,000 292,024 402,100 12,100 3.10% Fire Protection Services Total 393,476 400,547 390,000 292,024 402,100 12,100 3.10% PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES: The Fire Department is comprised of renewable contract agreements with the surrounding communities of Long Lake anc Wayzata, for fire suppression services. OPERATING COST ACTIVITIES: *Professional Services are the costs associated with the contract agreements with Long Lake and Wayzata, City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 70 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES: The Planning & Zoning Department oversees the development and redevelopment within the City in accordance with established policies and guidelines. The policies and guidelines have been created and are enforced to maintain the health, safety, and welfare of the public, as well as the aesthetics of the community. OPERATING COST ACTIVITI ES: *Personal Services include the wages and employment taxes for Planning and Zoning Staff. Staff includes: Director of Community Development, Planners (2), Planning Assistant and Building Officials, *Professional Services include engineering, legal consulting services and contracted building inspections. *Other Expenses includes training and development, and memberships in professional organizations for the Planning & Zoning Staff City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 71 2019 General Fund Operating Budget Departmental Summary Building & Zoning 42400 2019 Dollar % 2016 2017 2018 Y -T -D Mgr Increase Increase Actual Actual Budget Oct 31, 2018 Recommd Decrease (Decrease) Personal Services 579,795 576,868 571,839 433,194 527,860 (43,979) -7.69% Supplies & Maintenance 214 4,917 2,000 3,784 5,000 3,000 150.00% Professional Services 113,104 131,510 138,500 113,796 139,180 5,680 4.10% Other Expenses 3,526 10,807 27,390 4,294 23,870 (3,520) -12.85% Building & Zoning Total 696,639 724,102 739,729 555,068 695,910 (38,819) -5.25% PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES: The Planning & Zoning Department oversees the development and redevelopment within the City in accordance with established policies and guidelines. The policies and guidelines have been created and are enforced to maintain the health, safety, and welfare of the public, as well as the aesthetics of the community. OPERATING COST ACTIVITI ES: *Personal Services include the wages and employment taxes for Planning and Zoning Staff. Staff includes: Director of Community Development, Planners (2), Planning Assistant and Building Officials, *Professional Services include engineering, legal consulting services and contracted building inspections. *Other Expenses includes training and development, and memberships in professional organizations for the Planning & Zoning Staff City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 71 2019 General Fund Operating Budget Departmental Summary Engineering 43170 2019 Dollar 2016 2017 2018 Y -T -D Mgr Increase Increase Actual Actual Budget Oct 31, 2018 Recommd (Decrease) (Decrease) Professional Services 9,893 54,476 15,000 13,342 20,000 5,000 33.33% Engineering Total 9,893 54,476 15,000 13,342 20,000 5,000 33.33% PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES: The City maintains a renewable contract with a local firm to provide all engineering services. The Engineering Department provides professional representation and opinion on city services and operations. OPERATING COST ACTIVITIES: *Professional Services are the costs associated with the contract agreement with the engineering firm City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 72 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES: The Street Department provides for the maintainance of all city streets to ensure a safe and driveable condition. Standard maintenance includes seal -coating, patching, snow plowing, and sweeping. Due to its excess storage capacity, the City maintains cooperative agreements with surrounding communities for storage and sale of OPERATING COST ACTIVITIES: *Personal Services include the wages and employment taxes for the Public Works Department. Staff includes: Director of Public Works/City Engineer (15%), Public Works Supervisors (25%), Maintenance *Supplies & Maintenance include general operating supplies for street repair/maintenance, and vehicle and equipment maintenance. *Other Expenses include electricity costs for street lighting and employee development. City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 73 2019 General Fund Operating Budget Departmental Summary Public Works Department 43000 2019 Dollar % 2016 2017 2018 Y-T-D Mgr Increase Increase Actual Actual Budget Oct 31, 2018 Recommd Decrease Decrease Personal Services 284,386 306,540 342,178 278,788 282,060 (60,118) -17.57% Supplies & Maintenance 157,747 126,658 145,670 143,139 184,370 38,700 26.57% Professional Services 2,220 10,442 0 0 3,270 3,270 N/A Other Expenses 36,413 42,546 38,045 29,737 43,480 7,040 18.50% Public Works Total 480,765 486,187 525,893 451,664 513,180 (11,108) -2.11% PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES: The Street Department provides for the maintainance of all city streets to ensure a safe and driveable condition. Standard maintenance includes seal -coating, patching, snow plowing, and sweeping. Due to its excess storage capacity, the City maintains cooperative agreements with surrounding communities for storage and sale of OPERATING COST ACTIVITIES: *Personal Services include the wages and employment taxes for the Public Works Department. Staff includes: Director of Public Works/City Engineer (15%), Public Works Supervisors (25%), Maintenance *Supplies & Maintenance include general operating supplies for street repair/maintenance, and vehicle and equipment maintenance. *Other Expenses include electricity costs for street lighting and employee development. City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 73 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES: The Parks & Recreation Department provides for the maintainance of the City's parks. In addition, the city participates in a joint recreation program with area organizations to ensure a community -wide effort in providing OPERATING COST ACTIVITI ES: *Personal Services includes the wages and employment taxes for the Parks Department. Staff includes: Director of Public Works (10%), Parks/Golf Supervisor (50%), Maintenance Workers (5% *Supplies & Maintenance includes the operating supplies and maintenance for all park facilities. *Other Expenses includes the costs associated with the City's participation with Orono Community Education, and equipment rental City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 74 2019 General Fund Operating Budget Departmental Summary Parks 45200 2019 Dollar 2016 2017 2018 Y -T -D Mgr Increase Increase Actual Actual Budget Oct 31, 2018 Recommd Decrease Decrease Personal Services 36,133 38,272 84,346 72,043 127,210 42,864 50.82% Supplies & Maintenance 59,349 64,094 82,300 62,863 80,400 (1,900) -2.31% Professional Services 8,699 9,450 1,140 1,079 1,980 840 73.68% Other Expenses 5,725 7,811 5,350 8,181 8,850 3,500 65.42% Parks Total 109,906 119,627 173,136 144,166 218,440 45,304 26.17% PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES: The Parks & Recreation Department provides for the maintainance of the City's parks. In addition, the city participates in a joint recreation program with area organizations to ensure a community -wide effort in providing OPERATING COST ACTIVITI ES: *Personal Services includes the wages and employment taxes for the Parks Department. Staff includes: Director of Public Works (10%), Parks/Golf Supervisor (50%), Maintenance Workers (5% *Supplies & Maintenance includes the operating supplies and maintenance for all park facilities. *Other Expenses includes the costs associated with the City's participation with Orono Community Education, and equipment rental City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 74 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES: The Golf Course provides a golfing opportunity for both residents and visitors to the City. OPERATING COST ACTIVITIES: Personal Services include the wages and employment taxes for the Golf Course. Staff includes: Parks/Golf Supervisor (50%), Clubhouse Manager, Seasonal Golf Course Employee Supplies & Maintenance include general operating supplies for the course and equipment reapirs and maintenance. Insurances include the golf courses share of the City's general, liability, liquor, and auto insurance polices Other Expenses include utilities, golf cart rental, and advertising. Purchase for Resale are items that are food, beverage, clothing and golf supplies that are sold in the clubhouse City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 75 2019 General Fund Operating Budget Departmental Summary Golf Course 45210 2019 Dollar 2016 2017 2018 Y-T-D Mgr Increase Increase Actual Actual Budget Oct 31, 2018 Recommd Decrease Decrease Personal Services 87,672 94,561 84,533 97,485 119,130 34,597 40.93% Supplies & Maintenance 30,372 36,503 31,160 36,710 33,840 2,680 8.60% Insurances 12,883 14,020 13,070 10,379 13,520 450 3.44% Other Expenses 28,414 28,405 30,168 30,534 32,340 2,172 7.20% Purchases for Resale 12,020 11,220 13,900 8,909 13,900 0 0.00% Golf Course Total 171,362 184,709 172,831 184,016 212,730 39,899 23.09% PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES: The Golf Course provides a golfing opportunity for both residents and visitors to the City. OPERATING COST ACTIVITIES: Personal Services include the wages and employment taxes for the Golf Course. Staff includes: Parks/Golf Supervisor (50%), Clubhouse Manager, Seasonal Golf Course Employee Supplies & Maintenance include general operating supplies for the course and equipment reapirs and maintenance. Insurances include the golf courses share of the City's general, liability, liquor, and auto insurance polices Other Expenses include utilities, golf cart rental, and advertising. Purchase for Resale are items that are food, beverage, clothing and golf supplies that are sold in the clubhouse City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 75 2019 General Fund Operating Budget Departmental Summary Special Services -Consulting & Police 43280 2019 Dollar 2016 2017 2018 Y-T-D Mgr Increase Increase Actual Actual Budget Oct 31, 2018 Recommd Decrease Decrease Personal Services 26,784 35,675 40,750 56,784 40,750 0 0.00% Professional Services 96,234 102,670 55,000 61,837 85,000 30,000 54.55% Special Services -Consulting & Police Total 123,018 138,345 95,750 118,620 125,750 30,000 31.33% PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES: The Special Services Department provides a separate 'cost center' for tracking city -provided consulting and Police special service details. Orono residentswho apply for land use variations are subject to be billed for any additional staff, legal, and engineering time that is spent reviewing their application. Thesecharges are recorded in this departmental budget, and the applicants are subsequently billed for this additional time. Orono businesses or residentswho wish to contract with the city for Police security or traffic control are billed for the officers time. The City's costs are recorded in this departmentaIbudget, and are offset by the revenues received OPERATING COST ACTIVITIES (Reimbursed): *Personal Services include Police Officer overtime wages for security work and/or traffic control. *Professional Services include legal and engineering review expense for land use applications. City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 76 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES: The Special Projects & Contingencies Department includes funds allocated for planned projects or events that benefit the entire city, and for any unforseen circumstances that produces additional expenses. This department also provides for operating transfers to other funds. OPERATING COST ACTIVITIES: * Transfers are as follows: Improvement and Equipment Outlay Fund 255,000 2014 Improvement Bond Debt Service Fund 125,000 380,000 *Contingency Items is an amount for unbudgeted and unforseen items that require action before the next budget cycle GENERAL FUND TOTAL 7,962,016 8,446,277 8,193,401 6,125,072 8,577,280 383,879 4.69% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 77 2019 General Fund Operating Budget Departmental Summary Special Projects-Contingencies 43290 2019 Dollar % 2016 2017 2018 Y-T-D Mgr Increase Increase Actual Actual Budget Oct 31, 2018 Recommd Decrease Decrease Personal Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Professional Services 0 408 0 0 0 0 N/A Other Expenses 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Capital & Transfers 865,000 927,281 380,000 0 400,000 20,000 5.26% Contingency Items 8,004 57,924 0 0 100,000 100,000 N/A Special Projects-Contingencies Total 873,004 985,613 380,000 0 500,000 120,000 31.58% PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES: The Special Projects & Contingencies Department includes funds allocated for planned projects or events that benefit the entire city, and for any unforseen circumstances that produces additional expenses. This department also provides for operating transfers to other funds. OPERATING COST ACTIVITIES: * Transfers are as follows: Improvement and Equipment Outlay Fund 255,000 2014 Improvement Bond Debt Service Fund 125,000 380,000 *Contingency Items is an amount for unbudgeted and unforseen items that require action before the next budget cycle GENERAL FUND TOTAL 7,962,016 8,446,277 8,193,401 6,125,072 8,577,280 383,879 4.69% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 77 City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 78 City of Orono 2019 Line Item Budget Mayor & Council 41110 City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 79 2019 Dollar % 2015 2016 2017 2018 Y -T -D Mgr Increase Increase Actual Actual Actual Budget Oct 31, 2018 Recommd Decrease Decrease Personal Services 101 Full -Time Employees Regular 18,200 18,200 17,908 18,200 15,167 18,210 10 0.05% 122 FICA 1,392 1,392 1,370 1,392 1,160 1,400 8 0.57% 151 Worker's Comp Insurance Prem 90 50 70 73 55 80 7 9.59% Total Personal Services 19,682 19,642 19,348 19,665 16,382 19,690 25 0.13% Other Expenses 313 IT Services 0 0 0 0 0 800 800 N/A 433 Memberships 70,387 62,198 64,621 64,000 53,933 12,090 (51,910) -81.11% 437 Training & Development 540 267 325 500 6 250 (250) -50.00% 439 Meeting Expenses 836 1,332 1,134 1,000 840 1,200 200 20.00% 489 Other Miscellaneous Charges 0 0 469 0 0 0 0 N/A Total Other Expenses 71,763 63,797 66,549 65,500 54,780 14,340 (51,160) -78.11% City Council Total 91,446 83,440 85,898 85,165 71,162 34,030 (51,135) -60.04% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 79 City of Orono 2019 Line Item Budget Administration 41300 Supplies & Maintenance 2019 Dollar % 286 44 2015 2016 2017 2018 Y -T -D Mar Increase Increase Actual Actual Actual Budget Oct 31, 2018 Recommd Decrease Decrease 300 Personal Services 300 0 0.00% 101 Full -Time Employees Regular 189,820 178,909 159,423 220,379 189,291 290,270 69,891 31.71% 102 Full -Time Employees Overtime 0 1,098 149 1,300 424 1,300 0 0.00% 103 Part -Time Employees 0 0 60,720 0 0 0 0 N/A 104 Temporary Employees Regular 7,653 9,182 8,787 10,500 6,725 10,500 0 0.00% 121 PERA 13,545 13,305 11,242 16,626 14,230 21,870 5,244 31.54% 122 FICA 14,083 13,536 16,848 17,762 14,604 23,110 5,348 30.11% 135 City Benefit Contribution 24,960 35,931 30,923 37,920 31,660 59,460 21,540 56.80% 142 Unemployment Benefit Payments 0 0 17,758 0 0 0 0 N/A 151 Worker's Comp Insurance Prem 1,150 1,210 1,280 1,397 1,048 1,960 563 40.30% Total Personal Services 251,211 253,171 307,129 305,884 257,982 408,470 102,586 33.54% Supplies & Maintenance 208 Books & Periodicals 286 44 183 300 207 300 0 0.00% Total Supplies & Maintenance 286 44 183 300 207 300 0 0.00% Professional Services 313 IT Services 0 0 0 0 0 6,500 6,500 N/A 319 Professional Services 5,485 5,245 5,623 6,000 3,577 6,000 0 0.00% Total Professional Serivices 5,485 5,245 5,623 6,000 3,577 12,500 6,500 108.33% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 80 Total Other Expenses 2015 Actual 4,623 0 1,396 2,162 1,246 2,860 12,286 Other Expenses 331 Travel Expenses 340 General Advertising 433 Memberships 437 Training & Development 439 Meeting Expenses 489 Other Miscellaneous Charges Total Other Expenses 2015 Actual 4,623 0 1,396 2,162 1,246 2,860 12,286 12,000 4,380 13,200 1,200 10.00% Administration Total 269,268 270,683 318,443 324,184 266,147 434,470 110,286 34.02% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 81 City of Orono 2019 Line Item Budget Administration cont. % 41300 2016 2017 Actual Actual 3,600 1,044 0 0 1,338 171 4,338 722 553 1,329 2,394 2,241 0 12,223 5,507 12,000 4,380 13,200 1,200 10.00% Administration Total 269,268 270,683 318,443 324,184 266,147 434,470 110,286 34.02% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 81 2019 Dollar % 2018 Y -T -D Mar Increase Increase Budget Oct 31, 2018 Recommd Decrease Decrease 4,000 444 4,000 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 N/A 1,000 1,245 1,200 200 20.00% 3,500 1,341 4,500 1,000 28.57% 500 337 500 0 0.00% 3,000 1,013 3,000 0 0.00% 12,000 4,380 13,200 1,200 10.00% Administration Total 269,268 270,683 318,443 324,184 266,147 434,470 110,286 34.02% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 81 Elections Total 316 18,725 2,393 25,552 8,776 7,160 (18,392) -71.98% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 82 Total Personal Services 0 City of Orono 0 17,152 7,021 1,160 (15,992) -93.24% 2019 Line Item Budget Supplies & Maintenance Elections 208 Books & Periodicals 0 41410 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 221 Equipment Parts & Accessories 0 3,763 1,736 2,500 285 2019 Dollar % 240 2015 2016 2017 0 2018 Y -T -D Mar Increase Increase Actual Actual Actual Budget Oct 31, 2018 Recommd Decrease Decrease Personal Services 1,736 2,800 876 5,000 2,200 78.57% 102 Full -Time Employees Overtime 0 0 0 1,000 0 1,000 0 0.00% 104 Temporary Employees Regular 0 12,330 0 16,000 6,913 0 (16,000) -100.00% 121 PERA 0 0 (1,100) 0 75 0 80 5 6.67% 122 FICA 0 84 (500) 0 77 108 80 3 3.90% Elections Total 316 18,725 2,393 25,552 8,776 7,160 (18,392) -71.98% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 82 Total Personal Services 0 12,414 0 17,152 7,021 1,160 (15,992) -93.24% Supplies & Maintenance 208 Books & Periodicals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 221 Equipment Parts & Accessories 0 3,763 1,736 2,500 285 5,000 2,500 100.00% 240 Small Tools and Minor Equip 0 281 0 300 591 0 (300) -100.00% Total Supplies & Maintenance 0 4,044 1,736 2,800 876 5,000 2,200 78.57% Other Expenses 319 Professional Services 0 0 0 1,100 0 0 (1,100) -100.00% 322 Postage 316 1,328 657 1,500 0 1,000 (500) -33.33% 331 Travel Expenses 0 89 0 100 59 0 (100) -100.00% 340 General Advertising 0 325 0 400 86 0 (400) -100.00% 412 Building Rentals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 415 Other Equipment Rentals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 437 Training & Development 0 0 0 1,000 48 0 (1,000) -100.00% 439 Meeting Expenses 0 36 0 1,000 687 0 (1,000) -100.00% 489 Other Miscellaneous Charges 0 488 0 500 0 0 (500) -100.00% Total Other Expenses 316 2,266 657 5,600 880 1,000 (4,600) -82.14% Elections Total 316 18,725 2,393 25,552 8,776 7,160 (18,392) -71.98% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 82 City of Orono 2019 Line Item Budget Assessing 41550 2015 2016 2017 Actual Actual Actual 2019 Dollar % 2018 Y -T -D MRr Increase Increase Budget Oct 31, 2018 Recommd Decrease Decrease Assessing Services 302 Assessing Services 166,074 161,831 176,166 182,000 106,167 185,000 3,000 1.65% Total Assessing Service 166,074 161,831 176,166 182,000 106,167 185,000 3,000 1.65% Assessing Total 166,074 161,831 176,166 182,000 106,167 185,000 3,000 1.65% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 83 City of Orono 2019 Line Item Budget Finance Department 41500 City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 84 2019 Dollar % 2015 2016 2017 2018 Y -T -D Mgr Increase Increase Actual Actual Actual Budget Oct 31, 2018 Recommd Decrease Decrease Personal Services 101 Full -Time Employees Regular 208,801 220,068 196,301 211,239 170,380 162,670 (48,569) -22.99% 102 Full -Time Employees Overtime 0 0 1,186 200 0 200 0 0.00% 103 Part -Time Employees 21,368 19,551 24,367 23,953 24,091 31,010 7,057 29.46% 104 Temporary Employees Regular 0 0 0 0 1,164 0 0 N/A 121 PERA 17,271 17,225 16,594 17,639 14,586 14,530 (3,109) -17.63% 122 FICA 16,647 16,790 16,623 17,992 14,566 14,820 (3,172) -17.63% 135 City Benefit Contribution 41,207 39,731 42,943 53,880 30,658 38,120 (15,760) -29.25% 151 Worker's Comp Insurance Prem 1,250 1,330 1,610 1,623 1,217 1,400 (223) -13.74% Total Personal Services 306,544 314,695 299,624 326,526 256,662 262,750 (63,776) -19.53% Supplies & Maintenance 208 Books & Periodicals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Total Supplies & Maintenance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Professional Services 301 Auditing and Acct'g Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 313 IT Services 0 0 0 0 0 4,900 4,900 N/A Total Professional Services 0 0 0 0 0 4,900 4,900 N/A Other Expenses 331 Travel Expenses 190 0 175 1,500 304 1,500 0 0.00% 433 Memberships 325 325 330 400 270 400 0 0.00% 437 Training & Development 833 3,123 100 3,500 3,454 3,500 0 0.00% Total Other Expenses 1,347 3,448 605 5,400 4,027 5,400 0 0.00% Finance Total 307,892 318,143 300,229 331,926 260,689 273,050 (58,876) -17.74% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 84 City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 85 City of Orono 2019 Line Item Budget Law/Legal Services 41600 2019 Dollar % 2015 2016 2017 2018 Y -T -D Mar Increase Increase Actual Actual Actual Budget Oct 31, 2018 Recommd Decrease Decrease Professional Services 305 Legal -Retainer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 306 Legal -Prosecution 38,500 42,478 35,271 40,000 25,264 40,000 0 0.00% 307 Legal -Consulting 46,988 51,793 72,055 60,000 62,956 75,000 15,000 25.00% 308 Code Enforcement 2,054 1,999 2,043 2,000 727 2,000 0 0.00% 309 Jail Charges 9,040 16,648 10,746 10,000 2,806 12,000 2,000 20.00% Total Professional Services 96,581 112,918 120,115 112,000 91,752 129,000 17,000 15.18% Law/Legal Services Total 96,581 112,918 120,115 112,000 91,752 129,000 17,000 15.18% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 85 City of Orono 2019 Line Item Budget Central Services 41900 Total Insurances 30,200 30,200 30,200 30,200 22,650 38,290 8,090 26.79% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 86 Professional Services 2019 Dollar % 301 Auditing and Acct'g Services 2015 2016 2017 2018 Y -T -D Mar Increase Increase 311 Data Processing Communication Actual Actual Actual Budget Oct 31, 2018 Recommd Decrease Decrease 313 Supplies & Maintenance 0 0 0 0 0 49,000 49,000 N/A 201 Office supplies 13,130 11,685 10,331 12,000 7,222 12,000 0 0.00% 221 Equipment Parts & Accessories 3,838 970 4,490 3,000 4,848 500 (2,500) -83.33% 223 Bldg/Grounds Maint. Supplies 3,357 2,520 3,040 3,500 2,260 3,500 0 0.00% 401 Repairs/Maint-Office Equip 15,249 9,949 10,208 10,000 6,615 500 (9,500) -95.00% 403 Repairs/Maint-Misc. Equip 570 3,302 5,878 3,000 0 3,000 0 0.00% 404 Repairs/Maint-Bldgs/Grounds 23,870 20,699 38,841 20,500 35,875 22,000 1,500 7.32% 407 Janitorial Services 18,557 17,171 16,662 19,000 14,653 19,000 0 0.00% 416 Software Licensing 10,941 24,385 23,720 22,000 43,592 0 (22,000) -100.00% Total Supplies & Maintenance 89,511 90,681 113,169 93,000 115,065 60,500 (32,500) -34.95% Total Insurances 30,200 30,200 30,200 30,200 22,650 38,290 8,090 26.79% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 86 Professional Services 301 Auditing and Acct'g Services 20,000 20,000 21,250 20,000 20,250 22,000 2,000 10.00% 311 Data Processing Communication 0 0 75 0 0 0 0 N/A 313 IT Services 0 0 0 0 0 49,000 49,000 N/A 319 Professional Services 11,690 26,501 18,096 18,000 17,120 18,000 0 0.00% 370 Insurance Agent of Record 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 367 Total Professional Services 31,690 46,501 39,421 38,000 37,370 89,000 51,000 134.21% Total Insurances 30,200 30,200 30,200 30,200 22,650 38,290 8,090 26.79% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 86 Insurances 361 General Liability Ins 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 7,500 12,000 2,000 20.00% 362 Umbrella Liability Ins 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 3,750 10,000 5,000 100.00% 363 Bonds Insurance 200 200 200 200 150 1,040 840 420.00% 365 Boiler & Machinery Ins 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 975 0 (1,300) -100.00% 366 Property Insurance 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 3,750 10,000 5,000 100.00% 367 Equipment Floaters Ins 1,300 1,300 1,300 1,300 975 0 (1,300) -100.00% 368 Automotive Insurance 7,400 7,400 7,400 7,400 5,550 5,250 (2,150) -29.05% Total Insurances 30,200 30,200 30,200 30,200 22,650 38,290 8,090 26.79% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 86 City of Orono 2019 Line Item Budget Central Services cont. 41900 2015 2016 2017 2018 Actual Actual Actual Budget 2019 Dollar % Y -T -D Mar Increase Increase Oct 31, 2018 Recommd Decrease Decrease Central Services Total 240,555 268,437 296,496 258,800 271,294 294,890 36,090 13.95% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 87 Other Expenses 312 Bank Fees 4,408 6,181 8,685 4,000 14,760 20,000 16,000 400.00% 321 Telephone 8,331 11,343 9,817 10,000 10,201 10,000 0 0.00% 322 Postage 10,739 10,412 8,972 11,000 240 10,000 (1,000) -9.09% 329 Internet/Other Communications 3,863 6,873 9,836 6,000 11,897 0 (6,000) -100.00% 352 Printing & Publishing 15,182 15,373 24,294 15,000 13,852 16,000 1,000 6.67% 381 Gas & Electric 25,621 29,757 28,847 29,100 23,549 29,100 0 0.00% 382 Water Utilities 3,046 4,111 3,949 2,000 4,388 4,000 2,000 100.00% 413 Office Equipment Rental 17,045 16,685 18,862 20,000 16,734 17,500 (2,500) -12.50% 440 Special Equipment Replacement 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 489 Other Miscellaneous Charges 919 307 444 500 587 500 0 0.00% Total Other Expenses 89,154 101,054 113,706 97,600 96,208 107,100 9,500 9.73% Capital Outlay 512 Spec Assmts on Land & Int 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 750 Interest on Special Assmnts 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Total Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Central Services Total 240,555 268,437 296,496 258,800 271,294 294,890 36,090 13.95% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 87 City of Orono 11,997 12,426 2019 Line Item Budget 12,400 12,125 Human Services 41800 2019 Dollar % 2015 2016 2017 2018 Y -T -D Mar Increase Increase Actual Actual Actual Budget Oct 31, 2018 Recommd Decrease Decrease 12,426 Other Expenses 490 Contributions to Civic Org's 11,997 12,426 11,099 12,400 12,125 12,400 0 0.00% Total Other Expenses 11,997 12,426 11,099 12,400 12,125 12,400 Human Services Total 11,997 12,426 11,099 12,400 12,125 12,400 0 0.00% 0 0.00% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 88 Total Personal Services 3,120,780 3,223,019 3,366,031 3,581,214 2,739,713 3,680,660 99,446 2.78% Personal Services 101 Full -Time Employees Regular 102 Full -Time Employees Overtime 103 Part -Time Employees 104 Temporary Employees Regular 121 PERA 122 FICA 135 City Benefit Contribution 142 Unemployment Benefit Payments 151 Worker's Comp Insurance Prem Total Personal Services 3,120,780 3,223,019 3,366,031 3,581,214 2,739,713 3,680,660 99,446 2.78% Supplies & Maintenance City of Orono Office supplies 208 Books & Periodicals 212 Motor Fuels & Lubricants 221 2019 Line Item Budget 223 Bldg/Grounds Maint. Supplies 226 Clothing & personal equipment 228 Training Supplies Police Department Explorers Program expenses 240 Small Tools and Minor Equip 401 Repairs/Maint-Office Equip 402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip 42110 Repairs/Maint-Misc. Equip 404 Repairs/Maint-Bldgs/Grounds 407 Janitorial Services 416 Software Licensing 911 393 178 2019 Dollar % 2015 2016 2017 2018 Y -T -D Mar Increase Increase Actual Actual Actual Budget Oct 31, 2018 Recommd Decrease Decrease 2,226,744 2,299,446 2,399,855 2,521,195 1,925,315 2,580,810 59,615 2.36% 18,608 21,976 21,601 50,000 25,741 50,000 0 0.00% 98,356 71,395 46,258 54,333 54,616 56,000 1,667 3.07% 423 0 45 0 0 0 0 N/A 351,635 362,096 371,245 391,520 300,652 418,860 27,340 6.98% 44,327 44,316 46,062 50,086 40,010 52,040 1,954 3.90% 315,013 350,045 371,816 400,080 307,879 397,880 (2,200) -0.55% 404 2,914 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 65,270 70,830 109,150 114,000 85,500 125,070 11,070 9.71% Total Personal Services 3,120,780 3,223,019 3,366,031 3,581,214 2,739,713 3,680,660 99,446 2.78% 6,835 Supplies & Maintenance 201 Office supplies 208 Books & Periodicals 212 Motor Fuels & Lubricants 221 Equipment Parts & Accessories 223 Bldg/Grounds Maint. Supplies 226 Clothing & personal equipment 228 Training Supplies 229 Explorers Program expenses 240 Small Tools and Minor Equip 401 Repairs/Maint-Office Equip 402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip 403 Repairs/Maint-Misc. Equip 404 Repairs/Maint-Bldgs/Grounds 407 Janitorial Services 416 Software Licensing 6,835 7,351 3,991 8,000 2,701 6,000 (2,000) -25.00% 0 0 324 1,000 0 1,000 0 0.00% 48,008 44,913 78,568 100,000 67,085 100,000 0 0.00% 6,690 4,657 5,369 6,000 5,900 4,000 (2,000) -33.33% 911 393 178 1,300 202 1,300 0 0.00% 27,738 31,783 24,535 27,000 19,185 27,000 0 0.00% 18,512 15,951 8,136 16,000 6,055 16,000 0 0.00% 3,456 412 150 4,000 3,286 4,000 0 0.00% 2,642 1,839 3,256 5,000 6,218 5,000 0 0.00% 7,601 6,228 6,675 5,000 6,766 500 (4,500) -90.00% 35,045 35,529 35,808 45,000 26,045 45,000 0 0.00% 4,840 4,597 5,065 8,000 3,241 8,000 0 0.00% 7,678 7,219 6,558 6,500 6,071 6,500 0 0.00% 12,918 12,434 12,132 15,000 11,531 15,000 0 0.00% 9,987 13,651 9,943 13,500 7,767 0 (13,500) -100.00% Total Supplies & Maintenance 192,860 186,955 200,686 261,300 172,053 239,300 (22,000) -8.42% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 89 City of Orono 2019 Line Item Budget Police Department cont 42110 City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 90 2019 Dollar % 2015 2016 2017 2018 Y -T -D Mar Increase Increase Actual Actual Actual Budget Oct 31, 2018 Recommd Decrease Decrease Professional Services 304 Engineering -Consulting 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 307 Legal -Consulting 3,736 7,301 5,021 8,000 4,528 8,000 0 0.00% 310 LOGIS-Applications 64,164 73,184 77,988 106,641 62,253 110,790 4,149 3.89% 311 Data Processing Communication 4,115 4,947 8,788 6,000 2,197 6,000 0 0.00% 313 IT Services 0 0 0 0 0 72,840 72,840 N/A 317 Animal Care 85 424 190 500 1,049 500 0 0.00% 319 Professional Services 12,091 12,596 13,283 14,500 9,618 14,500 0 0.00% 370 Insurance Agent of Record 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Total Professional Services 84,190 98,451 105,269 135,641 79,646 212,630 76,989 56.76% Insurances 361 General Liability Ins 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 26,250 40,000 5,000 14.29% 362 Umbrella Liability Ins 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 7,500 15,000 5,000 50.00% 366 Property Insurance 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 750 1,000 0 0.00% 367 Equipment Floaters Ins 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 368 Automotive Insurance 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 6,750 15,000 6,000 66.67% 379 Insurance Deductibles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Total Insurances 55,000 55,000 55,000 55,000 41,250 71,000 16,000 29.09% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 90 Total Other Expenses Other Expenses 321 Telephone 322 Postage 329 Internet/Other Communications 331 Travel Expenses 340 General Advertising 352 Printing & Publishing 381 Gas & Electric 382 Water Utilities 413 Office Equipment Rental 414 EDP/Communications Equip Rent 433 Memberships 436 Towing Charges 437 Training & Development 439 Meeting Expenses 440 Special Equipment Replacement 441 Licenses & Taxes 489 Other Miscellaneous Charges Total Other Expenses 110,434 122,635 111,350 135,880 102,057 131,580 (4,300) -3.16% Capital Outlay City of Orono 2019 Line Item Budget 149,338 135,874 160,876 156,000 142,032 160,000 Police Department cont. 2.56% 560 Furniture and Fixtures 0 0 333 0 0 42110 0 N/A 570 Office Equip and Furnishings 6,176 0 3,002 3,000 2,727 3,000 0 2019 Dollar % 2015 2016 2017 2018 Y -T -D Mar Increase Increase Actual Actual Actual Budget Oct 31, 2018 Recommd Decrease Decrease 19,166 21,229 21,155 23,230 16,287 23,230 0 0.00% 114 99 206 1,200 92 1,000 (200) -16.67% 3,598 5,893 5,739 6,800 3,644 0 (6,800) -100.00% 28 580 211 250 0 250 0 0.00% 55 290 346 0 0 0 0 N/A 1,972 2,220 710 1,800 1,694 1,800 0 0.00% 24,965 18,100 17,650 20,000 13,374 20,000 0 0.00% 1,634 1,405 3,178 1,200 0 3,000 1,800 150.00% 4,106 4,133 4,492 3,600 4,198 4,500 900 25.00% 23,443 23,211 21,621 23,000 18,162 23,000 0 0.00% 2,770 3,000 2,680 5,000 6,400 5,000 0 0.00% 147 157 752 0 515 0 0 N/A 20,356 30,254 30,146 38,000 20,502 38,000 0 0.00% 2,142 2,395 1,699 2,500 1,276 2,500 0 0.00% 3,668 5,164 0 5,000 14,451 5,000 0 0.00% 2,040 3,282 199 1,300 1,273 1,300 0 0.00% 232 1,222 567 3,000 189 3,000 0 0.00% 110,434 122,635 111,350 135,880 102,057 131,580 (4,300) -3.16% Capital Outlay 550 Automotive Equipment 149,338 135,874 160,876 156,000 142,032 160,000 4,000 2.56% 560 Furniture and Fixtures 0 0 333 0 0 0 0 N/A 570 Office Equip and Furnishings 6,176 0 3,002 3,000 2,727 3,000 0 0.00% 575 IT Hardware & Applications 8,951 5,378 18,632 20,000 1,844 0 (20,000) -100.00% 580 Other Equipment 9,583 30,038 20,655 21,000 (3,262) 21,000 0 0.00% Total Capital Outlay 174,048 171,290 203,497 200,000 143,341 184,000 (16,000) -8.00% Police Total 3,737,312 3,857,350 4,041,833 4,369,035 3,278,060 4,519,170 150,135 3.44% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 91 2015 Actual Professional Services 318 Fire Services 383,856 319 Professional Services 0 Total Professional Services 383,856 Fire Protection Services Total 383,856 City of Orono 2019 Line Item Budget Fire Protection Services 42260 2019 Dollar % 2016 2017 2018 Y -T -D Mgr Increase Increase Actual Actual Budget Oct 31, 2018 Recommd Decrease Decrease 393,476 400,547 390,000 292,024 402,100 12,100 3.10% 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 393,476 400,547 390,000 292,024 402,100 12,100 3.10% 393,476 400,547 390,000 292,024 402,100 12,100 3.10% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 92 2015 Actual 428,200 115 0 0 31,784 33,318 52,105 0 2,510 Total Personal Services 548,032 Personal Services 101 Full -Time Employees Regular 102 Full -Time Employees Overtime 103 Part -Time Employees 104 Temporary Employees Regular 121 PERA 122 FICA 135 City Benefit Contribution 142 Unemployment Benefit Payments 151 Worker's Comp Insurance Prem 2015 Actual 428,200 115 0 0 31,784 33,318 52,105 0 2,510 Total Personal Services 548,032 Total Supplies & Maintenance Supplies & Maintenance 208 Books & Periodicals 212 Motor Fuels & Lubricants 221 Equipment Parts & Accessories 226 Clothing & personal equipment 240 Small Tools and Minor Equip 402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip 403 Repairs/Maint-Misc. Equip Total Supplies & Maintenance City of Orono 2019 Line Item Budget Building & Zoning 42400 2016 Actual 453,753 379 0 0 33,690 34,579 54,774 0 2,620 579,795 2017 2018 Actual Budget 444,881 Professional Services 304 Engineering -Consulting 307 Legal -Consulting 310 Inspection Services 312 Bank Fees 313 IT Services 319 Professional Services City of Orono 2019 Line Item Budget Building & Zoning 42400 2016 Actual 453,753 379 0 0 33,690 34,579 54,774 0 2,620 579,795 2017 2018 Actual Budget 444,881 428,441 35 200 0 0 0 0 31,662 32,148 32,626 32,791 65,204 75,840 0 0 2,460 2,419 576,868 571,839 2019 Dollar % Y -T -D Mar Increase Increase Oct 31, 2018 Recommd Decrease Decrease 335,175 399,530 0 200 0 0 0 0 24,762 29,980 25,187 30,580 46,256 65,260 0 0 1,814 2,310 433,194 527,860 (28,911) -6.75% 0 0.00% 0 N/A 0 N/A (2,168) -6.74% (2,211) -6.74% (10,580) -13.95% 0 N/A (109) -4.51% (43,979) -7.69% 262 142 0 500 120 500 0 0.00% 1,876 0 0 1,500 0 1,500 0 0.00% 449 22 4,814 0 3,534 3,000 3,000 N/A 0 50 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 90 0 130 0 0 N/A 2,587 214 4,917 2,000 3,784 5,000 3,000 150.00% 104 0 3,266 7,500 11,822 5,000 (2,500) -33.33% 23,886 24,864 19,174 16,000 11,654 16,000 0 0.00% 89,226 85,065 84,509 90,000 80,070 90,000 0 0.00% 0 0 0 5,000 4 0 (5,000) -100.00% 0 0 0 0 0 8,180 8,180 N/A 3,100 3,175 24,562 20,000 10,247 20,000 0 0.00% Total Professional Services 116,315 113,104 131,510 138,500 113,796 139,180 680 0.49% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 93 Total Other Expenses Other Expenses 321 Telephone 331 Travel Expenses 340 General Advertising 415 Other Equipment Rentals 416 Software Licensing 433 Memberships 437 Training & Development 439 Meeting Expenses 441 Licenses & Taxes Total Other Expenses 4,000 3,526 10,807 27,390 4,294 23,870 (3,520) -12.85% Building & Zoning Total 670,933 696,639 724,102 739,729 555,068 695,910 (43,819) -5.92% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 94 City of Orono 2019 2019 Line Item Budget % Building & Zoning cont. Y -T -D 42400 2015 2016 2017 Actual Actual Actual 0 0 162 402 468 286 0 0 921 0 0 125 0 0 6,000 1,330 875 675 1,386 2,013 539 881 139 600 0 32 1,500 4,000 3,526 10,807 27,390 4,294 23,870 (3,520) -12.85% Building & Zoning Total 670,933 696,639 724,102 739,729 555,068 695,910 (43,819) -5.92% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 94 2019 Dollar % 2018 Y -T -D Mar Increase Increase Budget Oct 31, 2018 Recommd Decrease Decrease 0 318 0 0 N/A 2,250 880 2,250 0 0.00% 1,000 865 500 (500) -50.00% 0 0 0 0 N/A 15,600 0 15,600 0 0.00% 1,200 739 1,200 0 0.00% 2,740 1,380 3,020 280 10.22% 4,500 80 1,200 (3,300) -73.33% 100 32 100 0 0.00% 4,000 3,526 10,807 27,390 4,294 23,870 (3,520) -12.85% Building & Zoning Total 670,933 696,639 724,102 739,729 555,068 695,910 (43,819) -5.92% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 94 City of Orono 2019 Line Item Budget Engineering 43170 2019 Dollar % 2015 2016 2017 2018 Y -T -D MRr Increase Increase Actual Actual Actual Budget Oct 31, 2018 Recommd Decrease Decrease Professional Services 303 Engineering -Retainer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 304 Engineering -Consulting 17,080 9,893 54,476 15,000 13,342 20,000 5,000 33.33% Total Professional Services 17,080 Engineering Total 17,080 9,893 54,476 15,000 13,342 20,000 5,000 33.33% 9,893 54,476 15,000 13,342 20,000 5,000 33.33% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 95 City of Orono 2019 Line Item Budget Public Works Department 43000 Professional Services Supplies & Maintenance 304 PW Engineering -Consulting 2019 Dollar % 208 Books & Periodicals 2015 2016 2017 2018 Y -T -D Mar Increase Increase 212 Motor Fuels & Lubricants Actual Actual Actual Budget Oct 31, 2018 Recommd Decrease Decrease 221 Personal Services 16,882 10,644 16,397 16,000 13,351 24,000 8,000 50.00% 101 Full -Time Employees Regular 200,530 192,777 194,825 220,971 182,553 183,520 (37,451) -16.95% 102 Full -Time Employees Overtime 6,008 11,317 6,738 11,000 12,831 11,000 0 0.00% 121 PERA 15,135 14,496 15,363 17,398 12,083 14,590 (2,808) -16.14% 122 FICA 15,143 14,195 15,425 17,746 12,102 14,890 (2,856) -16.09% 135 City Benefit Contribution 39,633 38,920 51,569 55,767 38,590 41,430 (14,337) -25.71% 142 Unemployment Benefit Payments 0 0 3,819 0 6,157 0 0 N/A 151 Worker's Comp Insurance Prem 13,730 12,680 18,800 19,296 14,472 16,630 (2,666) -13.82% 404 Total Personal Services 290,179 284,386 306,540 342,178 278,788 282,060 (60,118) -17.57% Professional Services Supplies & Maintenance 304 PW Engineering -Consulting 641 0 0 0 0 0 208 Books & Periodicals 169 169 0 170 0 170 0 0.00% 212 Motor Fuels & Lubricants 14,504 34,759 11,500 35,000 26,790 35,000 0 0.00% 221 Equipment Parts & Accessories 16,882 10,644 16,397 16,000 13,351 24,000 8,000 50.00% 222 Vehicle Equipment & Parts 5,286 4,433 4,257 8,000 6,000 8,000 0 0.00% 224 Street Maint. Materials/Supply 47,419 53,575 38,364 48,000 52,210 50,000 2,000 4.17% 226 Clothing & personal equipment 4,109 3,915 7,960 4,000 4,025 4,000 0 0.00% 240 Small Tools and Minor Equip 1,377 2,708 2,939 2,000 2,136 3,000 1,000 50.00% 321 Telephone 0 0 157 0 410 200 200 N/A 402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip 11,185 11,350 12,296 10,000 7,839 10,000 0 0.00% 403 Repairs/Maint-Misc. Equip 5,855 14,780 12,366 10,000 9,903 20,000 10,000 100.00% 404 Repairs/Maint-Bldgs/Grounds 1,982 10,635 2,719 4,500 4,696 10,000 5,500 122.22% 408 Contracted Street Maint. 63,927 10,779 17,703 8,000 15,780 20,000 12,000 150.00% Total Supplies & Maintenance 172,695 157,747 126,658 145,670 143,139 184,370 38,700 26.57% Professional Services 304 PW Engineering -Consulting 641 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 313 IT Services 0 0 0 0 0 3,270 3,270 N/A 314 Fleet Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 319 Professional Services 0 2,220 10,442 0 0 0 0 N/A Total Professional Services 641 2,220 10,442 0 0 3,270 3,270 N/A City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 96 Total Other Expenses Other Expenses 331 Travel Expenses 381 Gas & Electric 386 Street Lighting 414 EDP/Communications Equip Rent 415 Other Equipment Rentals 416 Software Licensing 433 Memberships 437 Training & Development 441 Licenses & Taxes 489 Other Miscellaneous Charges Total Other Expenses 32,724 36,413 42,546 38,045 29,737 43,480 5,435 14.29% Public Works Total 496,239 480,765 486,187 525,893 451,664 513,180 (12,713) -2.42% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 97 City of Orono Dollar 2019 Line Item Budget 2018 Public Works Department cont Mar Increase 43000 2015 2016 2017 Actual Actual Actual 352 0 169 3,027 4,686 2,000 24,612 26,064 27,996 0 775 4,938 254 1,309 3,849 0 0 0 284 180 25 3,498 2,867 2,888 50 280 63 647 252 617 32,724 36,413 42,546 38,045 29,737 43,480 5,435 14.29% Public Works Total 496,239 480,765 486,187 525,893 451,664 513,180 (12,713) -2.42% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 97 2019 Dollar % 2018 Y -T -D Mar Increase Increase Budget Oct 31, 2018 Recommd Decrease Decrease 175 205 175 0 0.00% 4,880 1,706 4,880 0 0.00% 25,000 20,833 29,000 4,000 16.00% 750 1,276 1,145 395 52.67% 960 3,215 4,000 3,040 316.67% 2,000 0 0 (2,000) -100.00% 250 309 250 0 0.00% 3,500 1,965 3,500 0 0.00% 250 176 250 0 0.00% 280 51 280 0 0.00% 32,724 36,413 42,546 38,045 29,737 43,480 5,435 14.29% Public Works Total 496,239 480,765 486,187 525,893 451,664 513,180 (12,713) -2.42% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 97 Total Personal Services Personal Services 101 Full -Time Employees Regular 102 Full -Time Employees Overtime 103 Part -Time Employees 104 Temporary Employees Regular 121 PERA 122 FICA 135 City Benefit Contribution 151 Worker's Comp Insurance Prem Total Personal Services 36,530 36,133 38,272 84,346 72,043 127,210 42,864 50.82% Supplies & Maintenance City of Orono 2019 Line Item Budget 212 Motor Fuels & Lubricants 0 19 0 0 69 Parks 500 N/A 221 Equipment Parts & Accessories 1,629 908 1,407 45200 617 500 0 0.00% 223 Bldg/Grounds Maint. Supplies 3,163 9,875 11,890 7,600 2019 Dollar % 2015 2016 2017 2018 Y -T -D Mar Increase Increase Actual Actual Actual Budget Oct 31, 2018 Recommd Decrease Decrease 21,368 19,286 19,951 49,860 44,253 75,920 26,060 52.27% 0 231 465 0 456 0 0 N/A 0 10,023 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 8,713 0 10,082 10,000 8,268 14,650 4,650 46.50% 1,420 1,419 1,531 3,739 3,353 5,700 1,961 52.45% 1,589 1,593 1,734 4,579 3,513 6,930 2,351 51.34% 2,701 2,091 2,620 11,574 8,754 16,230 4,656 40.23% 740 1,490 1,890 4,594 3,446 7,780 3,186 69.35% 36,530 36,133 38,272 84,346 72,043 127,210 42,864 50.82% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 98 Supplies & Maintenance 212 Motor Fuels & Lubricants 0 19 0 0 69 500 500 N/A 221 Equipment Parts & Accessories 1,629 908 1,407 500 617 500 0 0.00% 223 Bldg/Grounds Maint. Supplies 3,163 9,875 11,890 7,600 8,194 10,000 2,400 31.58% 225 Park Initiatives 6,573 7,309 1,411 15,000 6,846 10,000 (5,000) -33.33% 402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip 0 20 1,044 200 0 200 0 0.00% 403 Repairs/Maint-Misc. Equip 0 3,744 1,447 1,000 959 1,200 200 20.00% 404 Repairs/Maint-Bldgs/Grounds 46,088 37,472 46,895 58,000 46,178 58,000 0 0.00% Total Supplies & Maintenance 57,453 59,349 64,094 82,300 62,863 80,400 (1,900) -2.31% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 98 Professional Services 304 Engineering -Consulting 0 0 5,800 0 30 0 0 N/A 313 IT Services 0 0 0 0 0 840 840 N/A 314 Fleet Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 319 Professional Services 9,645 8,699 3,650 1,140 1,049 1,140 0 0.00% Total Professional Services 9,645 8,699 9,450 1,140 1,079 1,980 840 73.68% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 98 Total Other Expenses Parks Total City of Orono 2019 Line Item Budget Parks cont. 45200 2015 2016 2017 Actual Actual Actual 0 Other Expenses 321 Telephone 331 Travel Expenses 352 Printing & Publishing 381 Gas & Electric 415 Other Equipment Rentals 416 Software Licensing 439 Meeting Expenses 441 Licenses & Taxes 489 Other Miscellaneous Charges 490 Contributions to Civic Org's Total Other Expenses Parks Total City of Orono 2019 Line Item Budget Parks cont. 45200 2015 2016 2017 Actual Actual Actual 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 605 416 290 216 4,750 5,249 6,670 0 0 0 0 0 0 580 0 290 0 186 30 0 0 0 5,746 5,725 7,811 5,350 8,181 8,850 3,500 65.42% 109,375 109,906 119,627 173,136 144,166 218,440 45,304 26.17% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 99 2019 Dollar % 2018 Y -T -D Mar Increase Increase Budget Oct 31, 2018 Recommd Decrease Decrease 0 175 0 0 N/A 0 0 0 0 N/A 0 257 0 0 N/A 550 161 550 0 0.00% 3,500 6,285 7,000 3,500 100.00% 1,000 965 1,000 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 N/A 300 291 300 0 0.00% 0 46 0 0 N/A 0 0 0 0 N/A 5,746 5,725 7,811 5,350 8,181 8,850 3,500 65.42% 109,375 109,906 119,627 173,136 144,166 218,440 45,304 26.17% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 99 Total Personal Services 78,214 87,672 94,561 84,533 97,485 119,130 34,597 40.93% Personal Services 101 Full -Time Employees Regular 102 Full -Time Employees Overtime 103 Part -Time Employees 104 Temporary Employees Regular 121 PERA 122 FICA 135 City Benefit Contribution 142 Unemployment Benefit Payments 143 OPEB Expense 151 Worker's Comp Insurance Prem Total Personal Services 78,214 87,672 94,561 84,533 97,485 119,130 34,597 40.93% Supplies & Maintenance City of Orono Office supplies 212 Motor Fuels & Lubricants 221 Equipment Parts & Accessories 223 2019 Line Item Budget 226 Clothing & personal equipment 240 Small Tools and Minor Equip 401 Repairs/Maint-Office Equip 402 Golf Course 403 Repairs/Maint-Misc. Equip 404 Repairs/Maint-Bldgs/Grounds 0 0.00% 6,044 45210 6,988 6,800 8,226 7,200 400 5.88% 0 152 150 180 2019 Dollar % 2015 2016 2017 2018 Y -T -D Mar Increase Increase Actual Actual Actual Budget Oct 31, 2018 Recommd Decrease Decrease 31,809 31,918 34,348 29,337 28,771 36,210 6,873 23.43% 0 0 0 0 344 0 0 N/A 41,073 49,914 42,581 19,262 0 0 (19,262) -100.00% 960 880 10,085 15,000 50,264 57,040 42,040 280.27% 0 0 1,382 2,200 3,229 2,720 520 23.64% 3,042 3,171 4,416 4,865 3,732 7,140 2,275 46.76% 0 0 130 7,976 6,650 8,080 104 1.30% 0 0 0 0 75 0 0 N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 1,330 1,790 1,620 5,893 4,420 7,940 2,047 34.74% Total Personal Services 78,214 87,672 94,561 84,533 97,485 119,130 34,597 40.93% Total Supplies & Maintenance 416 Supplies & Maintenance 201 Office supplies 212 Motor Fuels & Lubricants 221 Equipment Parts & Accessories 223 Bldg/Grounds Maint. Supplies 226 Clothing & personal equipment 240 Small Tools and Minor Equip 401 Repairs/Maint-Office Equip 402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip 403 Repairs/Maint-Misc. Equip 404 Repairs/Maint-Bldgs/Grounds Total Supplies & Maintenance 416 239 213 330 229 0 (330) -100.00% 2,745 2,716 0 3,500 124 3,500 0 0.00% 659 4,336 1,602 2,500 3,304 2,500 0 0.00% 6,044 7,411 6,988 6,800 8,226 7,200 400 5.88% 0 152 150 180 458 300 120 66.67% 195 59 389 500 1,763 500 0 0.00% 53 165 0 100 0 100 0 0.00% 267 185 382 250 1,908 300 50 20.00% 2,170 4,352 13,495 3,000 3,640 5,440 2,440 81.33% 16,458 10,758 13,284 14,000 17,057 14,000 0 0.00% 29,006 30,372 36,503 31,160 36,710 33,840 2,680 8.60% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 100 Total Insurances 13,393 12,883 14,020 13,070 10,379 13,520 450 3.44% Other Expenses City of Orono 304 Engineering -Consulting 2019 Line Item Budget 0 0 0 383 0 0 N/A 312 Golf Course cont. 4,365 4,962 3,690 5,000 3,431 5,000 0 0.00% 45210 IT Services 0 0 0 0 0 1,640 1,640 N/A 314 Fleet Services 2019 Dollar % 0 0 2015 2016 2017 2018 Y -T -D Mar Increase Increase 0 0 Actual Actual Actual Budget Oct 31, 2018 Recommd Decrease Decrease 3,485 Insurances 3,300 2,336 3,300 0 0.00% 331 Travel Expenses 361 General Liability Ins 7,500 7,500 8,000 7,500 5,625 7,500 0 0.00% 362 Umbrella Liability Ins 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,125 1,500 0 0.00% 365 Boiler & Machinery Ins 300 300 350 300 225 350 50 16.67% 366 Property Insurance 2,300 2,300 2,650 2,300 1,725 2,650 350 15.22% 367 Equipment Floaters Ins 300 300 350 300 225 350 50 16.67% 368 Automotive Insurance 370 370 370 370 278 370 0 0.00% 369 Dram Shop Insurance 1,123 613 800 800 1,176 800 0 0.00% Total Insurances 13,393 12,883 14,020 13,070 10,379 13,520 450 3.44% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 101 Other Expenses 304 Engineering -Consulting 0 0 0 0 383 0 0 N/A 312 Bank Fees 4,365 4,962 3,690 5,000 3,431 5,000 0 0.00% 313 IT Services 0 0 0 0 0 1,640 1,640 N/A 314 Fleet Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 319 Professional Services 500 0 0 0 253 0 0 N/A 321 Telephone 2,952 3,485 3,255 3,300 2,336 3,300 0 0.00% 331 Travel Expenses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 340 General Advertising 1,519 500 500 1,750 859 1,750 0 0.00% 352 Printing & Publishing 0 379 811 736 1,723 750 14 1.90% 381 Gas & Electric 8,025 8,152 7,959 8,500 6,710 8,500 0 0.00% 415 Other Equipment Rentals 7,529 10,012 11,760 9,882 14,129 10,200 318 3.22% 433 Memberships 150 270 120 300 150 300 0 0.00% 437 Training & Development 19 0 0 150 0 150 0 0.00% 440 Special Equipment Replacement 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 441 Licenses & Taxes 675 535 294 550 285 550 0 0.00% 489 Other Miscellaneous Charges 0 119 17 0 275 200 200 N/A Total Other Expenses 25,733 28,414 28,405 30,168 30,534 32,340 2,172 7.20% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 101 Total Purchases for Resale Golf Course Total 2015 Actual (696) 4,440 3,355 0 2,821 3,187 0 City of Orono 2019 Line Item Budget Golf Course cont. 45210 2016 2017 Actual Actual 0 3,285 3,867 29 2,085 2,755 0 0 3,716 3,353 1,211 1,132 1,808 0 Purchases for Resale 090 PURCHASES FOR RESALE 091 Beer For Resale 092 Soft Drinks For Resale 093 Concessions For Resale-Txbl 094 Concessions For Resale-NonTax 095 Pro Shop Items For Resale 099 Other For Resale Total Purchases for Resale Golf Course Total 2015 Actual (696) 4,440 3,355 0 2,821 3,187 0 City of Orono 2019 Line Item Budget Golf Course cont. 45210 2016 2017 Actual Actual 0 3,285 3,867 29 2,085 2,755 0 0 3,716 3,353 1,211 1,132 1,808 0 13,107 12,020 11,220 13,900 8,909 13,900 0 0.00% 159,454 171,362 184,709 172,831 184,016 212,730 39,899 23.09% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 102 2019 Dollar % 2018 Y -T -D Mar Increase Increase Budget Oct 31, 2018 Recommd Decrease Decrease 0 0 0 0 N/A 3,800 3,498 3,800 0 0.00% 3,600 2,860 3,600 0 0.00% 1,500 582 1,500 0 0.00% 2,500 1,037 2,500 0 0.00% 2,500 932 2,500 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 N/A 13,107 12,020 11,220 13,900 8,909 13,900 0 0.00% 159,454 171,362 184,709 172,831 184,016 212,730 39,899 23.09% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 102 City of Orono 2019 Line Item Budget Special Services -Consulting & Police 43280 2015 2016 2017 2018 Actual Actual Actual Budget 2019 Dollar % Y -T -D Mar Increase Increase Oct 31, 2018 Recommd Decrease Decrease Special Services -Consulting & Police Total 103,456 123,018 138,345 95,750 118,620 125,750 30,000 31.33% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 103 Personal Services 102 Full -Time Employees Overtime 29,115 24,210 31,667 35,000 49,166 35,000 0 0.00% 121 PERA 3,989 2,252 3,607 5,250 6,985 5,250 0 0.00% 122 FICA 376 319 401 500 632 500 0 0.00% 135 City Benefit Contribution 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Total Personal Services 33,485 26,784 35,675 40,750 56,784 40,750 0 0.00% Professional Services 304 Engineering -Consulting 48,859 73,173 92,949 45,000 45,901 75,000 30,000 66.67% 307 Legal -Consulting 21,112 23,061 9,721 10,000 15,682 10,000 0 0.00% 319 Professional Services 0 0 0 0 254 0 0 N/A 800 Special Projects, Contingency 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Total Professional Services 69,971 96,234 102,670 55,000 61,837 85,000 30,000 54.55% Special Services -Consulting & Police Total 103,456 123,018 138,345 95,750 118,620 125,750 30,000 31.33% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 103 City of Orono 2019 Line Item Budget Special Projects -Contingencies 43290 2015 2016 2017 2018 Actual Actual Actual Budget 2019 Dollar % Y -T -D Mar Increase Increase Oct 31, 2018 Recommd Decrease Decrease Personal Services 101 Full -Time Employees Regular 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Total Personal Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Professional Services 304 Engineering -Consulting 0 0 408 0 0 0 0 N/A 319 Professional Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Total Professional Services 0 0 408 0 0 0 0 N/A Other Expenses 489 Other Miscellaneous Charges 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Total Other Expenses 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Capital & Transfers 510 Land 0 0 639 0 0 0 0 N/A 720 Operating Transfers 679,000 865,000 926,642 380,000 0 400,000 20,000 5.26% Total Capital & Transfers 679,000 865,000 927,281 380,000 0 400,000 20,000 5.26% Contingency Items 800 Special Projects, Contingency 24,500 8,004 57,924 0 0 100,000 100,000 N/A Total Contingency Items 24,500 8,004 57,924 0 0 100,000 100,000 N/A Special Projects -Contingencies Total 703,500 873,004 985,613 380,000 0 500,000 120,000 31.58% GENERAL FUND TOTAL 7,565,334 7,962,016 8,446,277 8,193,401 6,125,072 8,577,280 383,879 4.69% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 104 2019 Water Fund Operating Budget Departmental Summary 49400 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES: The Water Operating Fund provides for the funding of the City's water distribution system. These funds are accounted for separately and are designed to be funded primarily through water rates. OPERATING COST ACTIVITIES: *Included in 'Personal Services' are the wages and employment taxes for the Water Department Staff. Staff includes: Director of Public Works (20%), Public Works Supervisors (25%), Maintenance Workers (25%) and a Seasonal Employee. *Supplies & Maintenance' includes the operating supplies and maintenance for the water distribution system. *Professional Services' includes a portion of the costs related to the City's annual financial audit, IT Services, and engineering consulting costs related to water projects. *Other Expenses' include power supply costs, purchased water from the City of Wayzata, and a depreciation charge on the fixed assests. City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 105 2019 Dollar % 2017 2017 2018 Y -T -D Mgr Increase Increase Budget Actual Budget Oct 31, 2018 Recommd (Decrease) (Decrease) Personal Services 182,150 181,929 187,131 187,895 247,730 60,599 32.38% Supplies & Maintenance 139,700 97,893 148,700 175,584 130,810 (17,890) -12.03% Professional Services 22,700 24,032 24,900 18,893 36,700 11,800 47.39% Insurances 10,280 10,280 10,280 7,710 7,070 (3,210) -31.23% Other Expenses 254,800 326,478 265,600 112,079 430,360 164,760 62.03% Operating Transfers 55,000 55,000 55,000 0 55,000 0 Total Water Operating Fund 664,630 695,611 691,611 502,161 907,670 216,059 31.24% PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES: The Water Operating Fund provides for the funding of the City's water distribution system. These funds are accounted for separately and are designed to be funded primarily through water rates. OPERATING COST ACTIVITIES: *Included in 'Personal Services' are the wages and employment taxes for the Water Department Staff. Staff includes: Director of Public Works (20%), Public Works Supervisors (25%), Maintenance Workers (25%) and a Seasonal Employee. *Supplies & Maintenance' includes the operating supplies and maintenance for the water distribution system. *Professional Services' includes a portion of the costs related to the City's annual financial audit, IT Services, and engineering consulting costs related to water projects. *Other Expenses' include power supply costs, purchased water from the City of Wayzata, and a depreciation charge on the fixed assests. City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 105 2019 Sewer Fund Operating Budget Departmental Summary 49450 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES: The Sewer Operating Fund provides for the funding of the City's sewer collection system. The funds are accounted for separately and are designedto be funded primarily through sewer unit charges. OPERATING COST ACTIVITIES: *Included in 'Personal Services' are the wages and employment taxes for the Sewer Department Staff. Staff includes: Director of Public Works (30%), Public Works Supervisors (25%), Maintenance Workers (25%) *'Supplies & Maintenance' includes the operating supplies and maintenance for the sewer collection system. *'Professional Services' includes a portion of the costs related to the City's annual financial audit, IT Services, and engineering consulting costs related to sewer projects. *'Other Expenses' includes the City's disposal charges with the MCES, and a depreciation charge on fixed assets. City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 106 2019 Dollar % 2017 2017 2018 Y -T -D Mgr Increase Increase Budget Actual Budget Oct 31, 2018 Recommd (Decrease) (Decrease) Personal Services 309,360 309,163 318,198 219,241 276,750 (41,448) -13.03% Supplies & Maintenance 142,450 181,680 163,922 90,599 202,470 38,548 23.52% Professional Services 25,500 22,276 25,500 22,258 42,750 17,250 67.65% Insurances 18,930 18,930 18,930 14,198 12,730 (6,200) -32.75% Other Expenses 873,590 884,230 883,690 529,237 1,089,475 205,785 23.29% Operating Transfers 110,000 100,000 110,000 0 110,000 0 0.00% Total Sewer Operating Fund 1,479,830 1,516,279 1,520,240 875,532 1,734,175 213,935 14.07% PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES: The Sewer Operating Fund provides for the funding of the City's sewer collection system. The funds are accounted for separately and are designedto be funded primarily through sewer unit charges. OPERATING COST ACTIVITIES: *Included in 'Personal Services' are the wages and employment taxes for the Sewer Department Staff. Staff includes: Director of Public Works (30%), Public Works Supervisors (25%), Maintenance Workers (25%) *'Supplies & Maintenance' includes the operating supplies and maintenance for the sewer collection system. *'Professional Services' includes a portion of the costs related to the City's annual financial audit, IT Services, and engineering consulting costs related to sewer projects. *'Other Expenses' includes the City's disposal charges with the MCES, and a depreciation charge on fixed assets. City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 106 2019 Recycling Fund Operating Budget Departmental Summary 49500 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES: The city participates in a program to provide curbside recycling service. In addition, the city also provides a spring cleanup day for residents who have materials unsuitable for curbside recycling pickup. OPERATING COST ACTIVITIES: *Personal Services are a portion of the City Clerk's wages and the wages for City Staff whom participate in the spring cleanup. *Other Expenses includes disposal of items collected during the clean up day and materials related to organics recycling. *'Professional Services includes the costs associated with recycling collection. City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 107 2019 Dollar % 2017 2017 2018 Y -T -D Mgr Increase Increase Budget Actual Budget Oct 31, 2018 Recommd (Decrease) (Decrease) Personal Services 6,830 6,748 6,980 5,235 7,400 420 6.02% Supplies & Maintenance 1,000 0 1,500 0 0 (1,500) -100.00% Professional Services 110,500 104,205 115,000 91,364 117,880 2,880 2.50% Insurances 500 500 500 0 500 0 0 Other Expenses 6,170 11,750 6,170 9,071 8,750 2,580 41.82% Recycling Total 125,000 123,203 130,150 105,670 134,530 4,380 3.37% PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES: The city participates in a program to provide curbside recycling service. In addition, the city also provides a spring cleanup day for residents who have materials unsuitable for curbside recycling pickup. OPERATING COST ACTIVITIES: *Personal Services are a portion of the City Clerk's wages and the wages for City Staff whom participate in the spring cleanup. *Other Expenses includes disposal of items collected during the clean up day and materials related to organics recycling. *'Professional Services includes the costs associated with recycling collection. City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 107 2019 Stormwater Fund Operating Budget Departmental Summary 49910 2019 Dollar % 2017 2017 2018 Y -T -D Mgr Increase Increase Budget Actual Budget Oct 31, 2018 Recommd (Decrease) (Decrease) Personal Services 47,380 42,134 48,662 37,685 128,190 79,528 163.43% Supplies & Maintenance 30,000 4,477 31,300 9,581 31,530 230 0.73% Professional Services 19,500 35,490 19,500 11,953 21,500 2,000 10.26% Insurances 1,970 1,970 1,970 1,478 3,380 1,410 71.57% Other Expenses 52,700 110,123 59,700 15,864 172,210 112,510 188.46% Total Stormwater Operating Fund 151,550 194,193 161,132 76,561 356,810 195,678 121.44% PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES: The Stormwater Operating Fund provide sfunding to for the City's Stormwater responsibilities. The funds are accounted for separately and are designedto be funded primarily through stormwater service and trunk fees OPERATING COST ACTIVITIES: *Included in 'Personal Services' are the wages and employment taxes for the Public Works Department Staff. Staff includes: Director of Public Works (10%), Public Works Supervisors (25%), Maintenance Workers (5%) * Supplies & Maintenance includes material associated with culvert maintenance. *Other Expenses includes depreciation and an administrative charge and the annual LMCD Levy. *'Professional Services includes engineering and annual audit charges. City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 108 2019 Cable TV Operating Budget Departmental Summary 49840 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES: The Cable TV Fund was created to account for the Franchise fees that are collectected as part of the City's Franchise agreement with Mediacom. Expenditures include costs associated with recording and streaming meetings. OPERATING COST ACTIVITIES: *Included in 'Personal Services' are 10% of the wages for the IT Tech *'Professional Services includes IT Services and audit charges. * Other Expenses include webcasting/online content and an administrative charge to the General Fund City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 109 2019 Dollar 2017 2017 2018 Y -T -D Mgr Increase Increase Budget Actual Budget Oct 31, 2018 Recommd (Decrease) (Decrease) Personal Services 13,660 11,957 14,445 10,834 18,430 3,985 27.59% Supplies & Maintenance 500 985 2,000 330 2,000 0 0.00% Professional Services 4,500 6,335 2,000 4,655 9,500 7,500 375.00% Other Expenses 22,100 19,987 32,100 22,717 37,100 5,000 15.58% Total Sewer Operating Fund 40,760 39,264 50,545 38,536 67,030 16,485 32.61% PROGRAM DESCRIPTION & OBJECTIVES: The Cable TV Fund was created to account for the Franchise fees that are collectected as part of the City's Franchise agreement with Mediacom. Expenditures include costs associated with recording and streaming meetings. OPERATING COST ACTIVITIES: *Included in 'Personal Services' are 10% of the wages for the IT Tech *'Professional Services includes IT Services and audit charges. * Other Expenses include webcasting/online content and an administrative charge to the General Fund City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 109 City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 110 City of Orono 2019 Line Item Budget Water 49400 Total Personal Services 175,510 181,929 187,131 187,895 247,730 60,599 32.38% Supplies & Maintenance 201 Office supplies 212 Motor Fuels & Lubricants 216 Chemicals and Chem Products 221 Equipment Parts & Accessories 222 Vehicle Equipment & Parts 223 Bldg/Grounds Maint. Supplies 226 Clothing & personal equipment 227 Utility System Maint. Supplies 240 Small Tools and Minor Equip 401 Repairs/Maint-Office Equip 402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip 403 Repairs/Maint-Misc. Equip 404 Repairs/Maint-Bldgs/Grounds 405 Repairs/Maint-Watermains/plant 416 Software Licensing 0 44 200 0 200 2019 Dollar % 0 2016 2017 2018 Y -T -D Mgr Increase Increase 35,000 Actual Actual Budget Oct 31, 2018 Recommd Decrease Decrease Personal Services 0 0 N/A 0 23 1,000 757 101 Full -Time Employees Regular 116,806 108,869 116,233 128,838 147,460 31,227 26.87% 102 Full -Time Employees Overtime 9,971 14,185 10,000 4,166 10,000 0 0.00% 103 Part -Time Employees 9,749 12,183 11,977 12,046 15,510 3,533 29.50% 104 Temporary Employees Regular 0 0 0 0 7,500 7,500 N/A 121 PERA 9,975 10,068 10,366 9,263 12,980 2,614 25.22% 122 FICA 10,209 10,213 10,573 9,490 13,810 3,237 30.62% 135 City Benefit Contribution 15,130 21,970 21,676 20,714 29,860 8,184 37.76% 143 OPEB Expense 0 0 1,800 0 1,800 0 0.00% 151 Worker's Comp Insurance Prem 3,670 4,440 4,506 3,380 8,810 4,304 95.52% Total Personal Services 175,510 181,929 187,131 187,895 247,730 60,599 32.38% Supplies & Maintenance 201 Office supplies 212 Motor Fuels & Lubricants 216 Chemicals and Chem Products 221 Equipment Parts & Accessories 222 Vehicle Equipment & Parts 223 Bldg/Grounds Maint. Supplies 226 Clothing & personal equipment 227 Utility System Maint. Supplies 240 Small Tools and Minor Equip 401 Repairs/Maint-Office Equip 402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip 403 Repairs/Maint-Misc. Equip 404 Repairs/Maint-Bldgs/Grounds 405 Repairs/Maint-Watermains/plant 416 Software Licensing 0 44 200 0 200 0 0.00% 0 0 4,500 3,375 4,680 180 4.00% 32,417 32,621 35,000 35,091 35,000 0 0.00% 68 272 0 513 0 0 N/A 0 23 1,000 757 1,150 150 15.00% 336 1,364 200 1,209 200 0 0.00% 699 461 1,000 104 1,000 0 0.00% 15,283 18,775 35,000 32,861 25,000 (10,000) -28.57% 2,049 808 2,500 1,816 2,500 0 0.00% 0 173 2,300 44 0 (2,300) -100.00% 688 1,574 0 23 0 0 N/A 7,030 1,733 7,000 5,940 6,080 (920) -13.14% 4,080 2,442 4,000 616 4,000 0 0.00% 61,534 33,332 51,000 89,452 51,000 0 0.00% 6,682 4,272 5,000 3,782 0 (5,000) -100.00% Total Supplies & Maintenance 130,866 97,893 148,700 175,584 130,810 (17,890) -12.03% City of Orono - 2019 Budget age 111 Professional Services 301 Auditing and Acct'g Services 304 Engineering -Consulting 307 Legal -Consulting 312 Bank Fees 313 IT Services 314 Fleet Services 319 Professional Services Total Professional Services Insurances City of Orono 2019 Line Item Budget Water cont. 49400 33,939 24,032 24,900 18,893 36,700 11,800 47.39% 361 General Liability Ins 4,000 4,000 4,000 2019 Dollar % 2016 2017 2018 Y -T -D Mgr Increase Increase Actual Actual Budget Oct 31, 2018 Recommd Decrease Decrease 5,775 4,500 5,000 5,000 5,000 0 0.00% 22,801 12,444 15,000 5,872 15,000 0 0.00% 2,891 2,430 2,000 4,221 3,000 1,000 50.00% 2,473 2,114 2,400 3,800 2,400 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 11,300 11,300 N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 0 2,544 500 0 0 (500) -100.00% 33,939 24,032 24,900 18,893 36,700 11,800 47.39% 361 General Liability Ins 4,000 4,000 4,000 3,000 3,000 (1,000) -25.00% 362 Umbrella Liability Ins 1,800 1,800 1,800 1,350 0 (1,800) -100.00% 366 Property Insurance 3,800 3,800 3,800 2,850 3,440 (360) -9.47% 367 Equipment Floaters Ins 380 380 380 285 330 (50) -13.16% 368 Automotive Insurance 300 300 300 225 300 0 0.00% Total Insurances 10,280 10,280 10,280 7,710 7,070 (3,210) -31.23% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 112 Other Expenses 321 Telephone 322 Postage 340 General Advertising 352 Printing & Publishing 381 Gas & Electric 382 Water Utilities 387 Intergovernmental Services 409 Depreciation & Amortization 415 Other Equipment Rentals 433 Memberships 437 Training & Development 438 Administrative Charge 441 Licenses & Taxes 488 Fines & Penalties 489 Other Miscellaneous Charges City of Orono 2019 Line Item Budget Water cont. 49400 Total Other Expenses 250,157 326,478 265,600 2019 Dollar % 2016 2017 2018 Y -T -D Mgr Increase Increase Actual Actual Budget Oct 31, 2018 Recommd Decrease Decrease 2,046 2,398 2,500 3,346 2,500 0 0.00% 358 729 350 694 1,050 700 200.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 0 143 1,000 468 1,000 0 0.00% 60,251 74,461 73,000 63,300 73,000 0 0.00% 1,393 880 1,100 626 1,100 0 0.00% 25,171 40,618 30,000 16,936 30,000 0 0.00% 133,177 178,222 130,000 0 207,400 77,400 59.54% 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 596 657 650 452 650 0 0.00% 2,878 3,442 3,500 3,701 3,500 0 0.00% 16,000 16,000 16,000 12,000 102,660 86,660 541.63% 3,011 2,644 3,500 872 3,500 0 0.00% 0 0 0 7,031 0 0 N/A 5,275 6,286 4,000 2,653 4,000 0 0.00% Total Other Expenses 250,157 326,478 265,600 112,079 430,360 164,760 62.03% 612 Other Long -Term Oblig Interest (1,486) 0 0 0 0 0 Total Operating Expenses 600,752 640,611 636,611 502,161 852,670 216,059 33.94% Non -Operating Expenses 612 Other Long -Term Oblig Interest (1,486) 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 613 Other Interest Expense 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 720 Operating Transfers 55,000 55,000 55,000 0 55,000 0 0.00% Total Non -Operating Expenses 53,514 55,000 55,000 0 55,000 0 0.00% Total Water Fund 31.24% 654,266 695,611 691,611 502,161 907,670 216,059 City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 113 City of Orono 2019 Line Item Budget Sewer 49450 Total Personal Services 297,915 309,163 318,198 219,241 276,750 (41,448) -13.03% Supplies & Maintenance 201 Office supplies 212 Motor Fuels & Lubricants 221 Equipment Parts & Accessories 222 Vehicle Equipment & Parts 223 Bldg/Grounds Maint. Supplies 226 Clothing & personal equipment 227 Utility System Maint. Supplies 240 Small Tools and Minor Equip 401 Repairs/Maint-Office Equip 402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip 403 Repairs/Maint-Misc. Equip 404 Repairs/Maint-Bldgs/Grounds 406 Repairs/Maint-Swr lines/lifts 443 Repairs/Maint-I&I Reduction 387 98 400 0 400 2019 Dollar % 0 2016 2017 2018 Y -T -D Mgr Increase Increase 1,500 Actual Actual Budget Oct 31, 2018 Recommd Decrease Decrease Personal Services 2,300 (200) -8.00% 424 3,295 0 1,149 101 Full -Time Employees Regular 190,246 190,299 194,217 129,032 158,250 (35,967) -18.52% 102 Full -Time Employees Overtime 18,766 19,618 12,000 3,913 12,000 0 0.00% 103 Part -Time Employees 9,749 12,183 11,977 12,046 15,510 3,533 29.50% 104 Temporary Employees Regular 0 0 10,000 10,764 15,730 5,730 57.30% 121 PERA 16,018 16,657 16,365 12,490 13,940 (2,425) -14.82% 122 FICA 16,053 16,661 17,457 12,544 15,420 (2,037) -11.67% 135 City Benefit Contribution 34,873 37,554 37,484 26,079 30,950 (6,534) -17.43% 143 OPEB Expense 0 0 2,200 0 2,200 0 0.00% 151 Worker's Comp Insurance Prem 12,210 16,190 16,498 12,374 12,750 (3,748) -22.72% Total Personal Services 297,915 309,163 318,198 219,241 276,750 (41,448) -13.03% Supplies & Maintenance 201 Office supplies 212 Motor Fuels & Lubricants 221 Equipment Parts & Accessories 222 Vehicle Equipment & Parts 223 Bldg/Grounds Maint. Supplies 226 Clothing & personal equipment 227 Utility System Maint. Supplies 240 Small Tools and Minor Equip 401 Repairs/Maint-Office Equip 402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip 403 Repairs/Maint-Misc. Equip 404 Repairs/Maint-Bldgs/Grounds 406 Repairs/Maint-Swr lines/lifts 443 Repairs/Maint-I&I Reduction 387 98 400 0 400 0 0.00% 0 0 9,000 6,750 8,840 (160) -1.78% 1,946 410 1,500 2,041 1,530 30 2.00% 328 0 2,500 4,537 2,300 (200) -8.00% 424 3,295 0 1,149 1,000 1,000 N/A 867 2,596 1,000 126 1,000 0 0.00% 1,457 7,550 9,000 3,790 9,000 0 0.00% 2,024 1,194 2,500 1,493 2,500 0 0.00% 2,392 1,342 3,050 609 0 (3,050) -100.00% 5,356 7,082 3,000 2,825 1,440 (1,560) -52.00% 5,119 2,028 5,000 9,339 960 (4,040) -80.80% 0 36 1,500 0 1,500 0 0.00% 151,267 117,867 89,720 54,995 147,000 57,280 63.84% 17,616 33,425 25,000 0 25,000 0 0.00% Total Supplies & Maintenance 189,183 176,923 153,170 87,654 202,470 49,300 32.19% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 114 City of Orono 2019 Line Item Budget Sewer cont. 49450 City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 115 Insurances 2019 Dollar % 2016 2017 2018 Y -T -D Mgr Increase Increase 1,000 Actual Actual Budget Oct 31, 2018 Recommd Decrease Decrease Professional Services (3,600) -100.00% 366 Property Insurance 3,200 3,200 3,200 301 Auditing and Acct'g Services 7,000 6,500 6,500 6,500 6,500 0 0.00% 304 Engineering -Consulting 17,498 11,237 15,000 3,351 15,000 0 0.00% 307 Legal -Consulting 3,689 0 1,000 222 1,000 0 0.00% 312 Bank Fees 3,308 4,252 3,000 1,936 3,000 0 0.00% 313 IT Services 0 0 0 0 17,250 17,250 N/A 314 Fleet Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 319 Professional Services 0 288 0 10,250 0 0 N/A Total Professional Services 31,494 22,276 25,500 22,258 42,750 17,250 67.65% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 115 Insurances 361 General Liability Ins 8,000 8,000 8,000 6,000 9,000 1,000 12.50% 362 Umbrella Liability Ins 3,600 3,600 3,600 2,700 0 (3,600) -100.00% 366 Property Insurance 3,200 3,200 3,200 2,400 2,550 (650) -20.31% 367 Equipment Floaters Ins 1,230 1,230 1,230 923 330 (900) -73.17% 368 Automotive Insurance 2,900 2,900 2,900 2,175 850 (2,050) -70.69% Total Insurances 18,930 18,930 18,930 14,198 12,730 (6,200) -32.75% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 115 Other Expenses 321 Telephone 322 Postage 331 Travel Expenses 340 General Advertising 352 Printing & Publishing 381 Gas & Electric 382 Water Utilities 383 MCES-Sewer 387 Intergovernmental Services 409 Depreciation & Amortization 415 Other Equipment Rentals 416 Software Licensing 433 Memberships 437 Training & Development 438 Administrative Charge 439 Meeting Expenses 440 Special Equipment Replacement 441 Licenses & Taxes 489 Other Miscellaneous Charges City of Orono 2019 Line Item Budget Sewer cont. 49450 Total Other Expenses 823,599 888,987 894,442 2019 Dollar 195,033 2016 2017 2018 Y -T -D Mgr Increase Increase Actual Actual Budget Oct 31, 2018 Recommd Decrease Decrease 2,953 4,110 5,000 2,973 5,000 0 0.00% 1,787 1,946 1,600 1,262 4,800 3,200 200.00% 0 0 100 0 100 0 0.00 0 0 300 0 0 (300) -100.00% 0 885 0 42 300 300 N/A 28,320 22,945 35,000 20,180 35,000 0 0.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 395,680 431,942 431,940 433,782 555,365 123,425 28.57% 36,005 70,594 45,000 28,139 45,000 0 0.00% 311,135 308,847 320,000 0 330,000 10,000 3.13% 347 0 2,500 97 1,000 (1,500) -60.00% 7,198 4,757 10,752 2,944 0 (10,752) -100.00% 155 63 1,250 309 1,250 0 0.00% 4,679 1,815 4,500 3,938 4,500 0 0.00% 32,000 32,000 32,000 24,000 102,660 70,660 220.81% 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 417 374 1,000 32 1,000 0 0.00% 2,923 8,710 3,500 14,483 3,500 0 0.00% Total Other Expenses 823,599 888,987 894,442 532,181 1,089,475 195,033 21.80% Total Operating Expenses 1,361,122 1,416,279 1,410,240 875,532 1,624,175 213,935 15.17% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 116 City of Orono 2019 Line Item Budget Sewer cont. 49450 2019 Dollar 2016 2017 2018 Y -T -D Mgr Increase Increase Actual Actual Budget Oct 31, 2018 Recommd Decrease Decrease Non -Operating Expenses 613 Other Interest Expense 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 720 Operating Transfers 100,000 100,000 110,000 0 110,000 0 0.00% Total Non -Operating Expenses 100,000 100,000 110,000 0 110,000 0 0.00% Total Sewer Fund 1,461,122 1,516,279 1,520,240 875,532 1,734,175 213,935 14.07% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 117 City of Orono 2019 Line Item Budget Recycling 49500 2019 Dollar 2016 2017 2018 Y -T -D Mgr Increase Increase Actual Actual Budget Oct 31, 2018 Recommd Decrease Decrease Personal Services 101 Full -Time Employees Regular 3,488 5,900 6,030 4,523 6,380 350 5.80% 102 Full -Time Employees Overtime 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 103 Part -Time Employees 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 104 Temporary Employees Regular 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 121 PERA 252 442 450 338 480 30 6.67% 122 FICA 267 366 460 345 490 30 6.52% 135 City Benefit Contribution 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 151 Worker's Comp Insurance Prem 30 40 40 30 50 10 25.00% Total Personal Services 4,037 6,748 6,980 5,235 7,400 420 6.02% Supplies & Maintenance 221 Equipment Parts & Accessories 1,695 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 401 Repairs/Maint-Office Equip 0 0 1,500 0 0 (1,500) -100.00% Total Supplies & Maintenance 0 0 1,500 0 0 (1,500) -100.00% Professional Services 316 Contract Recycling Pickup 319 Professional Services Total Professional Services 101,942 104,205 110,500 91,364 117,880 7,380 6.68% 1,301 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 103,243 104,205 110,500 91,364 117,880 7,380 6.68% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 118 City of Orono 2019 Line Item Budget Recycling cont. 49500 2019 Dollar 2016 2017 2018 Y -T -D Mgr Increase Increase Actual Actual Budget Oct 31, 2018 Recommd Decrease Decrease Other Expenses 352 Printing & Publishing 483 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 361 General Liability Ins 0 0 500 0 500 0 0.00% 416 Software Licensing 1,548 879 0 1,849 1,750 1,750 N/A 438 Administrative Charge 2,500 625 2,500 1,875 2,500 0 0.00% 442 Spring,Fall,X-mas Cleanup 4,096 0 3,670 5,347 4,000 330 8.99% 444 Organics Recycling 0 0 0 0 500 500 N/A Total Other Expenses 8,628 1,504 6,670 9,071 9,250 2,580 38.68% Total Recycling Fund 115,907 112,458 125,650 105,670 134,530 8,880 7.07% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 119 City of Orono 2019 Line Item Budget Storm Water 49910 Total Personal Services Supplies & Maintenance 201 Office supplies 221 Equipment Parts & Accessories 223 Bldg/Grounds Maint. Supplies 227 Utility System Maint. Supplies 240 Small Tools and Minor Equip 401 Repairs/Maint-Office Equip 402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip 404 Repairs/Maint-Bldgs/Grounds 406 Repairs/Maint-Swr lines/lifts 44,900 42,134 48,662 37,685 128,190 79,528 163.43% 0 0 0 0 0 2019 Dollar % 0 2016 2017 2018 Y -T -D Mgr Increase Increase 0 Actual Actual Budget Oct 31, 2018 Recommd Decrease Decrease Personal Services 9,500 0 0.00% 4,278 695 1,000 1,301 101 Full -Time Employees Regular 35,017 32,836 36,309 29,460 78,640 42,331 116.59% 102 Full -Time Employees Overtime 1,115 96 0 299 0 0 N/A 104 Temporary Employees Regular 0 0 0 0 15,000 15,000 N/A 121 PERA 2,534 2,470 2,723 2,232 5,900 3,177 116.67% 122 FICA 2,611 2,581 2,798 2,314 7,170 4,372 156.25% 135 City Benefit Contribution 2,752 3,101 5,245 2,588 14,350 9,105 173.59% 143 OPEB Expense 0 0 530 0 530 0 0.00% 151 Worker's Comp Insurance Prem 870 1,050 1,057 793 6,600 5,543 524.41% Total Personal Services Supplies & Maintenance 201 Office supplies 221 Equipment Parts & Accessories 223 Bldg/Grounds Maint. Supplies 227 Utility System Maint. Supplies 240 Small Tools and Minor Equip 401 Repairs/Maint-Office Equip 402 Repairs/Maint-Auto Equip 404 Repairs/Maint-Bldgs/Grounds 406 Repairs/Maint-Swr lines/lifts 44,900 42,134 48,662 37,685 128,190 79,528 163.43% 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 1,300 2,080 1,530 230 17.69% 0 0 0 826 0 0 N/A 10,020 1,249 9,500 1,880 9,500 0 0.00% 4,278 695 1,000 1,301 1,000 0 0.00% 0 0 1,500 0 1,500 0 0.00% 875 4,033 4,000 3,253 4,000 0 0.00% 27,682 (129) 0 242 0 0 N/A 1,821 (1,371) 14,000 0 14,000 0 0.00% Total Supplies & Maintenance 44,676 4,477 31,300 9,581 31,530 230 0.73% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 120 City of Orono 2019 Line Item Budget Storm Water cont. 49910 2019 Dollar % 2016 2017 2018 Y -T -D Mgr Increase Increase Actual Actual Budget Oct 31, 2018 Recommd Decrease Decrease Insurances 361 General Liability Ins 362 Umbrella Liability Ins 367 Equipment Floaters Ins 368 Automotive Insurance 370 Insurance Agent of Record 379 Insurance Deductibles Total Insurances 3,500 Professional Services 0 0.00% 8,231 301 Auditing and Acct'g Services 3,500 3,500 3,500 304 Engineering -Consulting 13,470 31,990 15,000 307 Legal -Consulting 0 0 1,000 313 IT Services 0 0 0 314 Fleet Services 0 0 0 319 Professional Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Professional Services 16,970 35,490 19,500 Insurances 361 General Liability Ins 362 Umbrella Liability Ins 367 Equipment Floaters Ins 368 Automotive Insurance 370 Insurance Agent of Record 379 Insurance Deductibles Total Insurances 3,500 3,500 0 0.00% 8,231 15,000 0 0.00% 222 1,000 0 0.00% 0 2,000 2,000 N/A 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 0 N/A 11,953 21,500 2,000 10.26% 500 500 500 375 2,950 2,450 490.00% 220 220 220 165 0 (220) -100.00% 1,250 1,250 1,250 938 280 (970) -77.60% 0 0 0 0 150 150 N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 1,970 1,970 1,970 1,478 3,380 1,410 71.57% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 121 Other Expenses 322 Postage 331 Travel Expenses 352 Printing & Publishing 409 Depreciation & Amortization 415 Other Equipment Rentals 416 Software Licensing 433 Memberships 437 Training & Development 438 Administrative Charge 441 Licenses & Taxes 489 Other Miscellaneous Charges Total Other Expenses City of Orono 2019 Line Item Budget Storm Water cont. 49910 60,177 110,123 59,700 15,864 172,210 112,510 188.46% Total Operating Expenses 168,694 194,193 161,132 76,561 356,810 195,678 121.44% Non -Operating Expenses 2019 Dollar 2016 2017 2018 Y -T -D Mgr Increase Increase Actual Actual Budget Oct 31, 2018 Recommd Decrease Decrease 1,532 1,946 1,700 1,262 5,100 3,400 200.00% 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 0 0 0 24 0 0 N/A 35,817 41,685 38,000 0 53,500 15,500 40.79% 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 6,518 3,352 4,000 1,558 2,000 (2,000) -50.00% 0 0 0 1,020 58,780 58,780 N/A 310 321 0 0 500 500 N/A 16,000 16,000 16,000 12,000 51,330 35,330 220.81% 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 0 46,819 0 0 1,000 1,000 N/A 60,177 110,123 59,700 15,864 172,210 112,510 188.46% Total Operating Expenses 168,694 194,193 161,132 76,561 356,810 195,678 121.44% Non -Operating Expenses 513 Easements & Rights of Way 0 272 0 0 0 0 N/A 592 Storm Sewer Utility Const 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Total Non -Operating Expenses 0 272 0 0 0 0 N/A Total Stormwater Fund 168,694 194,465 161,132 76,561 356,810 195,678 121.44% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 122 City of Orono 2019 Line Item Budget Cable Franchise 49840 Professional Services 2019 Dollar 301 Auditing and Acct'g Services 2016 2017 2018 Y -T -D Mgr Increase Increase 307 Legal -Consulting Actual Actual Budget Oct 31, 2018 Recommd Decrease Decrease Personal Services 0 0 0 0 7,500 7,500 N/A 101 Full -Time Employees Regular 7,686 10,267 12,470 9,353 13,990 1,520 12.19% 102 Full -Time Employees Overtime 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 121 PERA 555 880 935 701 1,050 115 12.30% 122 FICA 588 730 954 716 1,080 126 13.21% 135 City Benefit Contribution 0 0 0 0 2,200 2,200 N/A 151 Worker's Comp Insurance Prem 70 80 86 65 110 24 27.91% Total Personal Services 8,899 11,957 14,445 10,834 18,430 2,465 17.06% Professional Services 301 Auditing and Acct'g Services 0 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 0 0.00% 307 Legal -Consulting 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 313 IT Services 0 0 0 0 7,500 7,500 N/A 319 Professional Services 1,465 4,335 0 2,655 0 0 N/A Total Professional Services 1,465 6,335 2,000 4,655 9,500 7,500 375.00% Other Expenses 329 Internet/Other Communications 13,728 13,175 25,000 20,842 30,000 5,000 20.00% 401 Repairs/Maint-Office Equip 1,974 985 2,000 330 2,000 0 0.00% 409 Depreciation & Amortization 4,314 4,312 4,600 0 4,600 0 0.00% 438 Administrative Charge 2,500 2,500 2,500 1,875 2,500 0 0.00% Total Other Expenses 22,516 20,972 34,100 23,047 39,100 5,000 14.66% Total Operating Expenses 32,880 39,264 50,545 38,536 67,030 5,000 0 Total Cable TV Fund 32,880 39,264 50,545 38,536 67,030 14,965 29.61% City of Orono - 2019 Budget Page 123 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, November 26, 2018 7:00 o'clock p.m. ROLL CALL The Orono City Council met on the above-mentioned date with the following members present: Mayor Dennis Walsh, City Council Members Richard Crosby, III, Wendy Dankey, and Aaron Printup. Representing Staff were City Administrator Dustin Rief, Finance Director Ron Olson, Community Development Director Jeremy Barnhart, City Planner Melanie Curtis, Public Works Director/City Engineer Adam Edwards, and Recorder Jackie Young. Mayor Walsh called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m., followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. APPROVAL OF AGENDA CONSENT AGENDA 1. CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 13, 2018 2. CLAIMS/BILLS 3. NON -WAIVER OF TORT LIMITS — RESOLUTION NO. 6917 4. APPROVAL OF THE 2019 LIQUOR LICENSE RENEWALS 5. ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT 6. LA18-000092 — WILLIAM AND SUE DUNKLEY, 2709 WALTERS PORT LANE — FINAL PLAT — RESOLUTION NO. 6918 This item was removed from the Consent Agenda. Printup moved, Crosby seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda as revised, with Item No. 6 being removed from the Consent Agenda. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. PUBLIC COMMENTS None PRESENTATION 7. SENATOR DAVID OSMEK Senator Osmek provided the City Council with the following update: - The 2018 MN Legislature ended with a 900 -page bill that was ultimately sent to the Governor. Osmek stated the bill was based on a negotiation between the House, the Senate, and the Governor. - One of the components to the bill was regarding tax conformity with the new Federal tax code. In order for Minnesota to comply with the new Federal tax code, the state tax code has to be Page 1 of 6 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, November 26, 2018 7:00 o'clock p.m. reformed or it could cost Minnesota taxpayers between $800 to $900 million. Osmek stated in order for that to be completed on time, it needs to be addressed in the very immediate future. Also included in the bill were two bills relating to energy. One bill was to help the Prairie Island Native Indian community to become carbon free by providing them with renewable development account money. The bill also set a cap on the amount of money the residents have to pay for waste at the Prairie Island plant. That amount is now approaching $30 million every single year but that has now been reduced and capped. Another portion of the bill dealt with the Renewable Development Account, which dealt with the Benson turkey manure burning plant. The plant was actually trucking in turkey manure from Alabama and other places in order to run that plant to create energy. The cost of that energy was significantly higher than any other energy source in the state. The plant has been shut down and the state is projecting a savings of $600 to $800 over the next ten years. Some new legislative action that will be considered in 2019 is regarding distracted driving. The MN Legislature is going to clarify some definitions in the state statute regarding criminal vehicular manslaughter. If a distracted driver kills someone, that person will be given a prison sentence. Walsh asked what Senator Osmek sees the Republican Party accomplishing this coming year. Osmek stated he hopes to keep the budget at the cost of the CIP or at the rate of inflation. Over the past few years, the budget has been expanding at more than double the rate of inflation, and the taxpayers cannot afford to keep that up. Osmek noted there is money in the budget for Highway 12 but that additional money is needed for infrastructure. The Legislature also needs to deal with community solar gardens, which is part of a statute created in 2013 to help people who wanted to be part of the green energy movement. Community solar gardens are increasingly becoming very expensive for the taxpayer. Currently power generated from solar gardens costs between $130 to $140 per megawatt hour. Utility grade solar is between $40 and $50 a megawatt hour. Fossil fuel and natural gas is about $7 to $8 a megawatt hour. Osmek noted taxpayers are paying the differential. A portion of the rates is the amount of money they are paying for the land. Currently farmers are getting $1000 a year per acre to rent their land out. Farm land that is sold goes for between $4,000 to $5,000 an acre. Osmek stated the statute was intended for consumers to be able to join the green revolution but a large percent are larger businesses or government institutions, which is not what is was created for. Crosby noted there is talk about a gas tax increase and asked what the tax is currently. Osmek indicated it is eitherl8 or 23 cents a gallon for the state and that what is being proposed is between a nickel and a dime. Osmek noted the Highway Distribution Fund over the next seven to ten years is going to exceed inflation by 90 percent and that the state is going to receive even more money because the fees and car tabs continue to escalate. Crosby stated the tab fee in Minnesota is exceptionally high and it is taxed on an annual basis. Crosby stated his understanding is that those dollars are supposed to go to infrastructure. Page 2 of 6 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, November 26, 2018 7:00 o'clock p.m. Osmek stated that is correct and that the Department of Transportation needs to be held accountable for where the money is going. Some of the money is siphoned off for trails and a portion goes to the Plymouth Link and Southwest Transit. Osmek stated MN/DOT gets very defensive when they start asking questions about how the money is spent but that those questions need to be asked. Walsh asked what Senator Osmek sees for MSA money. Osmek stated the Legislature did provide for some small city accounts because under MSA rules, any city with a population under 5,000 does not qualify for MSA. Osmek stated there will be an additional portion but that he does not know what that will be. Printup asked if the Legislature is doing anything about 5G technology. Osmek noted the Legislature did pass that at the end of 2017 in preparation for the Super Bowl. Osmek stated the Legislature put in a roadmap with reasonable fee structures and other guidelines. G5 technology allows someone to download things in seconds instead of minutes but these boxes need to be within line of sight of each other and only augment someone's current bandwidth and will not eliminate any cell towers. Osmek stated his committee covers utilities and telecom and that he is aware there are areas even within his senate district that have problems with broadband access and internet speeds. Dankey asked if there is going to be any competition in the cable market. Osmek stated cities could be allowed to accept competitive bids but that one of the results likely will be that they will not receive their fees anymore. Rief noted Orono is not part of the LMCC anymore and that a lot of the phone calls he receives is regarding the fact that there is only one provider. Rief asked if the Legislature is considering allowing municipalities to enter that market to drive some competition Osmek stated he would rather have the large media companies compete against each other because it helps lower the price. Osmek stated he will bring that up the next time the telecoms are in his office and ask them how they can make it a more competitive market. Osmek stated the 5G technology could be that impetus and create that type of environment. Osmek noted he will be seeking re-election in 2020. 6. LA18-000092 — WILLIAM AND SUE DUNKLEY, 2709 WALTERS PORT LANE — FINAL PLAT — RESOLUTION NO. 6918 Sue and Bill Dunkley, Applicants, and Paul and Eric Vogstrom, were present. Printup asked if the two lots are totally conforming. Curtis indicated that is true. Printup moved, Dankey seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 6918, a Resolution Approving the Plat of Pence Lane Addition. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. Page 3 of 6 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, November 26, 2018 7:00 o'clock p.m. PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER REPORT 8. EAST LONG LAKE TRAIL MASTERPLAN APPROVAL Edwards noted earlier this spring the City shut down the northern section of East Long Lake Road due to flooding and directed Staff and the Parks Commission to look at converting that portion of the road to a trail. Bolton & Menk put together a concept plan. The idea with the concept is to take that plan and seek grant opportunities for funding. The majority of the work would consist of the removal of the existing roadway and the provision of a new trail. Added to that are some stormwater and environmental improvements within the corridor, and then in specific locations they will be looking at places for rock outcroppings where people can fish along with the placement of some benches and tables. The Park Commission did discuss this item and sought public comment. Included in the Council packet is a consolidation of the public comments that were received. Some legitimate concerns were brought up but most of those will be better addressed when the detailed design is done. Overall people were supportive of the concept. Walsh commented this is an incredible opportunity because it is very rare to convert an existing road into a nature trail. The Park Commission and neighbors are excited about the prospect. The project also provides opportunities for some Eagle Scout projects as well as grant opportunities. Walsh stated this is an opportunity to make it a destination area. Council Members Crosby and Dankey agreed it is a wonderful opportunity for the community. Printup stated beautifying the area is a good move. Printup moved, Dankey seconded, to approve the master/concept plan for the East Long Lake Trail. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. 9. 2019 PUBLIC WORKS PLAN DRAFT Edwards stated the purpose of this item is to provide the City Council with an overview of the 2019 Public Works Plan draft. The final plan will be presented to the City Council at their December 10 meeting. The plan is an effort to improve the planning and budgeting of Public Works and Engineering activities for the City of Orono. There are individual items on the list that will be brought before the City Council for approval but this provides some direction to the Public Works Department on how to proceed. The intent of the Plan is as follows: Provide an increased level of detail and refinement on those items from the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) that are scheduled for the upcoming calendar and fiscal year. 2. Improve the coordination/timing of projects. Page 4 of 6 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, November 26, 2018 7:00 o'clock p.m. 3. Provide the City Council with a comprehensive list of work for approval early in the year in conjunction with the CIP and budget approvals. 4. Ensure that the Public Works and Engineering Department's priorities and work items are meeting Council intent and direction. 5. Identify items for planning and engineering the year prior to their execution. Upon approval, the public works and engineering staff will begin executing the plan. Many of the projects will require further Council action for design approvals and/or award of contracts. The final plan and associated engineering proposals will be presented for approval at the December council meeting. Walsh stated four years ago when this was implemented, it gave the Council the opportunity to better budget for these items and look ahead on what projects should be completed. The City's infrastructure is now on an interactive 31) program, which allows future councils to look at the plans and go forward accordingly. Walsh stated in his view it is a good plan, and that when it comes to roads, the City is starting to catch up on improvements and are now switching to more maintenance. Walsh noted the City has a list of possible road projects for 2019 but that it is best to wait until after the spring thaw before deciding what road projects will be completed. The City Council took no formal action on this item. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT Printup stated he had nothing to report but that he would like to wish everyone a happy belated Thanksgiving. Crosby commented he hopes everyone had a nice Thanksgiving. Dankey noted this Friday night is Orono's first annual Christmas tree lighting, which will happen at the Orono Golf Course from 5-7 p.m. Pictures with Santa and other activities are planned for the evening. Dankey commented she is also looking forward to the City of Orono getting these hockey rinks going and getting the kids outside. Walsh noted the City Council meeting on December 10 will be the last meeting of the year and will also be the last meeting for Council Member Dankey because she has chosen to step down from the Council. Matt Johnson will be joining the Council in 2019. CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT Rief reported all the City's 2018 road projects have been wrapped up for the year and that Staff is in the process of looking at 2019 road projects. Rief noted the truth -in -taxation meeting will be held prior to the December 10 Council meeting. Page 5 of 6 MINUTES OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING Monday, November 26, 2018 7:00 o'clock p.m. CITY ATTORNEY REPORT None ADJOURNMENT Crosby moved, Dankey seconded, to adjourn the Orono City Council meeting at 7:34 p.m. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor Page 6 of 6 Orono City Council Work Session Minutes Monday, November 26, 2018 Council Chambers 5:00 p.m. PRESENT: Mayor Dennis Walsh, Council Members Richard F. Crosby II, Wendy Dankey and Aaron Printup. Representing staff were City Administrator Dustin Rief, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Adam Edwards, Community Development Director Jeremy Barnhart, Finance Director Ron Olson and City Clerk Anna Carlson. GUESTS: David Martini, Matt Johnson Meeting Start Time: 5:05 p.m. 1. 2019 Street Projects Update Bolten & Menk representative David Martini presented an overview of the four roads up for projects in 2019. Martini explained the projected costs and improvements to be made to East Long Lake Road. He noted two reasons for reclaiming a small portion of the road were to provide continued access to a property and the first section of the Trail that will begin there. Martini explained the upgrades that will be made to Tonka View Lane and Chevy Chase Drive to help mitigate the drainage issues. Mayor Dennis Walsh asked Martini to explain the issues. Martini mentioned that there is an excess of rain water draining onto properties and the rain water then sits in the area and deteriorates the road. He noted part of the project will address the drainage issues. Public Works Director/City Engineer Adam Edwards mentioned the needs to reshape and redirect the drainage way slightly. Martini explained the plans for upgrades to Forest Arms Landing. He discussed the 2019 schedule of projects. Edwards recommended that East Long Lake Road to be a contingency road in case costs were looking to exceed the budget. Edwards mentioned that we were approached by the City of Plymouth in regards to repairs needed to be made to Ferndale Road North. The City of Plymouth is looking to reconstruct, pave and repair the storm water system. Plymouth is willing to finance the project and work on the details with Orono. Walsh noted that he would like to review roads again in the spring before we commit to certain roads for 2020. 2. Budget Update Finance Director Ron Olson presented the budget update. He noted that the City Council will be adopting the final budget and levy at the December 10th meeting. Olson mentioned that the tax capacity rate decreased slightly and that Orono is one of the four cities that has not completely recovered to the peak of home values of 2008. Orono City Council Work Session Minutes Monday, November 26, 2018 Council Chambers 5:00 p.m. Walsh mentioned that the city has dedicated ourselves to the density and lifestyle of Orono and because of that we may end up paying a little more for some things. Olson explained the various Enterprise Funds that are seeing increases and decreases. Walsh mentioned that we have budgeted well in areas to stay ahead of the curve and in the long run, we will be able to take advantage of the responsible budgeting we are doing now. Olson noted that adopting the Capital Improvement Plan will not automatically approve all purchases, it is used as a guide to be used for budget. 3. Comprehensive Plan Update Community Development Direct Jeremy Barnhart distributed the paper maps for the Comp plan. He explained that the Comp Plan will be presented at the December 10th meeting and that any additional changes have been posted on the website. Barnhart mentioned that the packet distributed tonight has all the comments received by the public. The Planning Commission met on the November 18th and have approved the Comp Plan. Once it is approved it will be submitted, and if any other changes are received, it will be brought back for approval. Walsh mentioned that he would like to make sure the guidelines were modified back to the original plans. Council Member Aaron Printup asked why the numbers have changed so drastically since the numbers shown in June. Barnhart referred to the Transportation map depicted on page 4a3. Orono originally included the entire area of the map and only needed to include the Orono section only. Because the Orono area is much smaller than the entire map area, the numbers decreased drastically. 4. Food Fund Balance There was discussion regarding the Food Fund Balance. The At Risk Kids funds is at $6,000. 5. Mission/Goals City Administrator Dustin Rief presented a handout in regards to the City's mission/goals and strategies. It will be discussed at the January Council Work Session. Meeting End 6:32 p.m. ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 4 Item Description: Claims/Bills Date: December 10, 2018 Presenter: Ron Olson, Agenda Consent Agenda Finance Director Section: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to approve payment of claims made on the City for services and/or products provided to the City. 2. Background. The attached claims for payment have been received by the City. Staff has reviewed the claims and is recommending approval of the listing for payment. The claims will be paid by checks 110883 to 110992, totaling $324,729.18. 3. Noteworthy Payments. Vendor Amount Description of Payment Payment for the 2nd half of the Carman Bay Lake #110898 Carman Bay LID $ 6,553.41 Improvement District Levy. These funds were received from the County on 12/3/18. #110908 City of Long Lake $100,524.75 Payment for the 1" Quarter 2019 Fire Services. This is a 2019 Expenditure. #110936 LMCD $14,042.75 Payment for the 4' Quarter levy of the LMCD. Total paid for the 2018 levy was $56,171.00. Pass-through payment for participation in the Toward Zero #110988 W Hennepin Public Safety $ 6,203.39 Deaths program. Total grant funds received from the State of MN $53,550.54 with Orono's share being $5,512.5. 4. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of a motion authorizing payment to the claims list as presented. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the claims list as presented. Exhibits A. Check Register Prepared By: 2Y(9 Reviewed By: _SbV Approved By: 5b)R City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 1 Check Issue Dates: 11/27/2018 - 12/10/2018 Dec 06, 2018 09:32AM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Payee Issue Date Number Number GARLOCK, RUTH 12/05/2018 110826 110618 101-41410-104 Total 110826: David Weekley Homes 11/30/2018 110883 113018 101-22205 Total 110883: Olson, Todd 11/30/2018 110884 113018 101-22205 Total 110884: A 1 ELECTRIC SERVICE OF WA 12/10/2018 110887 21111 408-48800-520 A 1 ELECTRIC SERVICE OF WA 12/10/2018 110887 21145 101-42110-404 A 1 ELECTRIC SERVICE OF WA 12/10/2018 110887 21146 101-43000-404 A 1 ELECTRIC SERVICE OF WA 12/10/2018 110887 21147 101-43000-404 A 1 ELECTRIC SERVICE OF WA 12/10/2018 110887 21202 101-42110-404 A 1 ELECTRIC SERVICE OF WA 12/10/2018 110887 21216 602-16500 A 1 ELECTRIC SERVICE OF WA 12/10/2018 110887 21222 225-45200-530 A 1 ELECTRIC SERVICE OF WA 12/10/2018 110887 21230 602-16500 Total 110887 ADVANCED IMAGING SOLUTIO 12/10/2018 110888 371762246 101-42110-413 ADVANCED IMAGING SOLUTIO 12/10/2018 110888 371998352 101-41900-413 Total 110888 ADVANCED IMAGING SOLUTIO 12/10/2018 110889 INV181738 101-41900-401 ADVANCED IMAGING SOLUTIO 12/10/2018 110889 INV181738 101-42110-401 ADVANCED IMAGING SOLUTIO 12/10/2018 110889 INV181738 602-49450-401 Total 110889 Description General Election 11/6/18 Escrow Refund 2018-00418 2885 Wood Duck Trail Escrow Refund 2018-00075 & 17-3981 3325 Crystal Brush Site Wiring Hall Lights at PD1 South Door Opener Switch Replacement PW Building - Junction Box Repair Lights at PD1, 1 Spare Power Supply LS #9 Generator Install and Wire Fest Tent Area LS #5 Install Police Copier 11/20/18-12/20/18 CH Copier Lease 11/20/18-12/20/18 Printers 11/10/18-12/9/18 Printers 11/10/18-12/9/18 Printers 11/10/18-12/9/18 Department Elections Police Department Public Works Department Public Works Department Police Department Police Department Central Services Central Services Police Department Sewer Invoice Amount 80.00- 10,000.00 1,000.00 1,068.59 102.42 146.71 77.36 589.34 2,230.00 7,308.52 6,576.00 40 -0 - 534.38 i G„ 7C 93.74 93.74 234.35 ALLSTREAM Police Department 301.88 Central Services 422.63 Water 70.44 Sewer 211.32 12/10/2018 110890 15725369 101-42110-321 Phone service ALLSTREAM 12/10/2018 110890 15725369 101-41900-321 Phone Service ALLSTREAM 12/10/2018 110890 15725369 601-49400-321 Phone Service ALLSTREAM 12/10/2018 110890 15725369 602-49450-321 Phone Service City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 2 Check Issue Dates: 11/27/2018 - 12/10/2018 Dec 06, 2018 09:32AM Department Invoice Amount Elections Administration Administration Central Services Central Services Central Services Water Parks Parks Parks Golf Course Parks Parks Parks Parks OCB Road Reconstruction Central Services Central Services 1,006.27 154.45 102.99 200.96 458.40 1,500.00 492.00 2,484.00 208.00 208.00 137.14 107.15 53.81 53.57 137.14 53.57 1,532.50 425.50 651.00 Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Payee Issue Date Number Number Total 110890: ANNA CARLSON 12/10/2018 110891 120318 101-41410-331 Mileage Reimbrusement ANNA CARLSON 12/10/2018 110891 120318 101-41300-437 Mileage Reimbrusement ANNA CARLSON 12/10/2018 110891 120318 101-41300-331 Mileage Reimbrusement Total 110891: APPRIZE TECHNOLOGY SOLUT 12/10/2018 110892 16864 101-41900-319 Annual Enrollment Fee APPRIZE TECHNOLOGY SOLUT 12/10/2018 110892 16864 101-41900-319 Administrative Fee 10/18 APPRIZE TECHNOLOGY SOLUT 12/10/2018 110892 17092 101-41900-319 Administrative Fee 12/18 Total 110892: AWWA 12/10/2018 110893 7001610428 601-49400-433 01/19 -12/19 -Membership D.Goman Total 110893: BIFFS INC 12/10/2018 110894 W701333 101-45200-415 Bederwood Park BIFFS INC 12/10/2018 110894 W701334 101-45200-415 Summit Beach BIFFS INC 12/10/2018 110894 W701335 101-45200-415 Hackberry Park BIFFS INC 12/10/2018 110894 W701336 101-45210-415 Orono Golf Course BIFFS INC 12/10/2018 110894 W701337 101-45200-415 Crystal Bay Playground BIFFS INC 12/10/2018 110894 W701338 101-45200-415 Navarre Playground BIFFS INC 12/10/2018 110894 W701339 101-45200-415 French Creek Preserve BIFFS INC 12/10/2018 110894 W701340 101-45200-415 Lurton Park Total 110894: BRAUN INTERTEC 12/10/2018 110895 8151237 402-48055-304 OCB Road Project 18-021 BRAUN INTERTEC 12/10/2018 110895 B151242 435-48971-304 2018 Street Improvements Total 110895: BUDGET PRINTING 12/10/2018 110896 8515 101-41900-221 Plate & Holders for Chamber & CC BUDGET PRINTING 12/10/2018 110896 8538 101-41900-352 Lurton Park Dog Park Permits Total 110896: Department Invoice Amount Elections Administration Administration Central Services Central Services Central Services Water Parks Parks Parks Golf Course Parks Parks Parks Parks OCB Road Reconstruction Central Services Central Services 1,006.27 154.45 102.99 200.96 458.40 1,500.00 492.00 2,484.00 208.00 208.00 137.14 107.15 53.81 53.57 137.14 53.57 1,532.50 425.50 651.00 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 3 Check Issue Dates: 11/27/2018 - 12/10/2018 Dec 06, 2018 09:32AM Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Payee Issue Date Number Number Amount CARDMEMBER SERVICE 12/10/2018 110897 102618-2 101-42400-340 Comp Plan Promotion Building & Zoning 100.00 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 12/10/2018 110897 102918 101-45200-416 Big Island Security Camera Parks 21.97 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 12/10/2018 110897 110518-2 101-41900-201 Water Filter Cartridges Central Services 254.25 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 12/10/2018 110897 111318-2 225-45200-530 Rubber Walking Mat - Crystal Bay Ice Rink 137.08 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 12/10/2018 110897 111518 101-42110-201 PD Supplies Police Department 14.67 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 12/10/2018 110897 111518-1 101-45210-437 GC Training/Development Golf Course 105.70 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 12/10/2018 110897 112018 101-43000-226 Safety Apparel Public Works Department 19.99 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 12/10/2018 110897 112118 701-49800-212 Ethanol Free Fuel for Small Engines 8.14 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 12/10/2018 110897 112118-1 101-43000-226 Winter Clothing Public Works Department 194.98 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 12/10/2018 110897 112618 101-42110-402 Carwash Squad #235 Police Department 10.00 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 12/10/2018 110897 112618-1 101-41410-437 Election Judge Thank You Cards Elections 19.32 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 12/10/2018 110897 112618-2 101-41110-439 WS Food 11/26/18 Mayor & Council 48.21 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 12/10/2018 110897 112618-3 101-41110-439 Cookies for 11/26/18 Meeting Mayor & Council 14.48 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 12/10/2018 110897 112618-4 101-42400-433 Notary Renewal - C. Mattson Building & Zoning 120.00 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 12/10/2018 110897 112618-5 101-43000-437 City Engineer Association Dues & Conference Public Works Department 125.00 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 12/10/2018 110897 112618-5 601-49400-437 City Engineer Association Dues & Conference Water 125.00 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 12/10/2018 110897 112618-5 602-49450-437 City Engineer Association Dues & Conference Sewer 125.00 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 12/10/2018 110897 112718 101-45200-416 Big Island Security Camera Parks 29.97 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 12/10/2018 110897 112818 101-41300-489 Staff Development Supplies Administration 14.99 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 12/10/2018 110897 112818-1 101-41300-489 Staff Development Supplies Administration 44.27 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 12/10/2018 110897 112818-2 101-41300-489 Staff Development Supplies Administration 19.40 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 12/10/2018 110897 112818-2 101-43290-800 Tree Lighting Supplies Special Projects -Contingencies 14.94 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 12/10/2018 110897 120118 101-42110-489 Nursing home donations Police Department 16.74 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 12/10/2018 110897 120318 101-42110-437 DMT Refresher Training - J. Dembouski Police Department 75.00 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 12/10/2018 110897 120418 101-42110-226 Replacement Boots Police Department 205.00 CARDMEMBER SERVICE 12/10/2018 110897 120418-1 601-49400-405 Plumbing Parts for Well #3 Flow Meter Water 73.78 Total 110897: Carmen Bay Lake Improvement D 12/10/2018 110898 120518 239-25694-489 Total 110898: CENTERPOINT ENERGY MAIN 12/10/2018 110899 112118 602-49450-381 CENTERPOINT ENERGY MAIN 12/10/2018 110899 3000843803 602-16500 Total 110899: CENTURY LINK 12/10/2018 110900 111918 101-45210-321 1,937.88 2nd Half CBLID Payment 6,553.41 6,553.41 Generator LS #5 Sewer 16.13 LS #20 & Generator Install/Meter 1,297.00 1,313.13 GC phone/internet 11/19-12/18/18 Golf Course 210.66 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 4 Check Issue Dates: 11/27/2018 - 12/10/2018 Dec 06, 2018 09:32AM Payee Check Issue Date Check Number Invoice Number Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Amount Total 110900: 210.66 CHRIS FISCHER 12/10/2018 110901 110618 101-42110-226 Remiburse-clothing Police Department 69.98 Total 110901: 69.98 CHRISTINE MATTSON 12/10/2018 110902 112918 101-42400-441 Reimb Notary Registration Building & Zoning 20.00 Total 110902: 20.00 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 12/10/2018 110903 0016227 101-42110-402 #244 Service Police Department 851.83 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 12/10/2018 110903 0016232 101-42110-402 #248 Service Police Department 231.77 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 12/10/2018 110903 0016234 101-42110-402 #245 Service Police Department 598.53 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 12/10/2018 110903 0016238 101-42110-402 #249 Service Police Department 339.41 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 12/10/2018 110903 0016241 101-42110-402 #232 Service Police Department 125.45 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 12/10/2018 110903 0016247 101-42110-402 #256 service Police Department 100.78 CHUNKS LAKESHORE AUTO 12/10/2018 110903 0016258 101-42110-402 #841 Service Police Department 80.55 Total 110903: 2,328.32 CINTAS CORPORATION 12/10/2018 110904 4012717794 101-43000-226 Uniforms Public Works Department 64.83 CINTAS CORPORATION 12/10/2018 110904 4012828634 101-41900-401 Gray Mats and Air Svc Central Services 21.92 CINTAS CORPORATION 12/10/2018 110904 4012828694 101-41900-401 Mat Service Central Services 10.80 CINTAS CORPORATION 12/10/2018 110904 4013038552 101-43000-226 Uniforms Public Works Department 65.64 Total 110904: 163.19 CITY OF CORCORAN 12/10/2018 110905 101718 101-42110-437 ACIP Conference Parking Police Department 36.00 CITY OF CORCORAN 12/10/2018 110905 120318 101-33490 4th Qtr 2018 Toward Zero Deaths Grant 6,266.32 Total 110905: 6,302.32 CITY OF DAYTON 12/10/2018 110906 120318 101-33490 4th Qtr 2018 Toward Zero Deaths Grant 5,708.81 Total 110906: 5,708.81 City of Deephaven 12/10/2018 110907 120318 101-33490 4th Qtr 2018 Towards Zero Death Grant 1,699.26 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Check Issue Dates: 11/27/2018 - 12/10/2018 Page: 5 Dec 06, 2018 09:32AM Payee Check Issue Date Check Number Invoice Number Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Amount Total 110907: 1,699.26 CITY OF LONG LAKE 12/10/2018 110908 00201445 101-42260-318 1st Qtr 2019 Fire Service Fire Protection Services 100,524.75 Total 110908: 100,524.75 CITY OF MEDINA 12/10/2018 110909 120318 101-33490 4th Qtr 2018 Toward Zero Deaths Grant 10,283.18 Total 110909: 10,283.18 CITYVIEW PLUMBING & HEATIN 12/10/2018 110910 48573 601-49400-404 Repair Navarre Pipe Leak Water 764.38 Total 110910: 764.38 CONTINENTAL RESEARCH CO 12/10/2018 110911 471613 -CRC 101-43000-221 Snow Plow Protectant Public Works Department 280.00 Total 110911: 280.00 CORNERHOUSE 12/10/2018 110912 SPD162019 101-42110-319 2019 Forensic Interview Svcs Police Department 3,045.00 Total 110912: 3,045.00 DAVID GUTERMUTH 12/10/2018 110913 111918 101-22205 Escrow Refund #2017-01498 2665 Casco Pt Rd 1,000.00 Total 110913: 1,000.00 David Weekley, Homes 12/10/2018 110914 120518 101-22205 Escrow Refund 2018-01067 570 Sandhill Dr 2,500.00 David Weekley Homes 12/10/2018 110914 120518-1 101-22205 Escrow Refund 2018-003512872 Wood Duck Tr 1,000.00 David Weekley Homes 12/10/2018 110914 120518-3 101-22205 Escrow Refund 2018-00069 2839 Goldenrod Way 1,000.00 David Weekley Homes 12/10/2018 110914 120518-4 101-22205 Escrow Refund 2018-00036 2865 Wood Duck Tr 10,000.00 David Weekley Homes 12/10/2018 110914 120518-5 101-22205 Escrow Refund 2018-00261 2868 Wood Duck Tr 8,500.00 David Weekley Homes 12/10/2018 110914 120618 101-22205 Escrow Refund 2018-00375 2837 Goldenrod Way 1,000.00 Total 110914: 24,000.00 DEPT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 12/10/2018 110915 123118 101-45210-441 2019 Liquor License Golf Course 20.00 Total 110915: 20.00 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Check Issue Dates: 11/27/2018 - 12/10/2018 Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Payee Issue Date Number Number DUSTIN RIEF 12/10/2018 110916 120318 101-41300-331 Mileage Reimb Total 110916: ECM PUBLISHERS INC 12/10/2018 110917 651304 101-43290-800 Tree Lighting Advertisement Total 110917: ERSTAD, ROB & STACY 12/10/2018 110918 120518 101-22205 Escrow Refund 2018-00463 2340 Oliver Hill Total 110918: ESS BROTHERS & SONS 12/10/2018 110919 YY5846 602-49450-227 Sewer Cleanout and Curb box ESS BROTHERS & SONS 12/10/2018 110919 YY5846 602-49450-240 Manhole Lifiting Hooks ESS BROTHERS & SONS 12/10/2018 110919 YY8279 602-49450-227 Manhole Protection Ring Total 110919: FASTENAL 12/10/2018 110920 MNPLY11078 101-43000-226 Safety Ear Plugs Total 110920: FOAM IT SPRAY FOAM INSULAT 12/10/2018 110921 111818 601-49400-403 Spray Foam Water Tower Room Total 110921: GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 12/10/2018 110922 3270-422083 701-49800-240 Shop Supplies, Creepers GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 12/10/2018 110922 3270-423323 701-49800-222 Oil Filter GENUINE PARTS COMPANY/NA 12/10/2018 110922 3270-423892 701-49800-222 Unit #452 Grease Fitting Total 110922: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 12/10/2018 110923 8110638 601-49400-489 locates GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 12/10/2018 110923 8110638 602-49450-489 locates Total 110923: GPSit INC 12/10/2018 110924 101918 101-42110-416 GPS tracker and service plan Department Administration Special Projects -Contingencies Sewer Sewer Sewer Public Works Department Water Water Sewer Police Department Page: 6 Dec 06, 2018 09:32AM Invoice Amount 882.00 1,606.00 148.42 148.42 745.00 745.00 212.80 145.13 145.12 290.25 240.00 City of Orono Invoice Amount 240.00 Public Works Department Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT 54.48 Central Services 1,108.92 Check Issue Dates: 11/27/2018 - 12/10/2018 1,108.92 Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Payee Issue Date Number Number Police Department 452.59 452.59 Police Department 18.64 18.64 Total 110924: 929.88 Public Works Department 929.88 1,859.76 GRAINGER INC 12/10/2018 110925 9013417697 101-43000-404 Heater Repairs PW Shop Total 110925: 1,000.00 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASUR 12/10/2018 110926 113018 101-41900-352 2019 TNT Costs Total 110926: High Road Heating & Cooling 12/10/2018 110927 10685 602-49450-403 Water Treatment Plant Generator Service Total 110927: INDELCO PLASTICS CORP 12/10/2018 110928 INV079693 701-49800-222 Brine Tank Repairs/Values - Unit 424 through 427 Total 110928: JAM] WITTKE 12/10/2018 110929 111618 101-42110-226 Reimb Clothing Total 110929: JESSICA WEIRDER 12/10/2018 110930 111518 101-42110-439 Suspense Workgroup Total 110930: JOHN DEERE GOVERNMENTS 12/10/2018 110931 116457691 101-45200-221 Front Mounted Blade Unit 351 JOHN DEERE GOVERNMENTS 12/10/2018 110931 116457691 101-43000-221 Front Mounted Blade Unit 351 Total 110931: JR'S ADVANCED RECYCLERS 12/10/2018 110932 96580 603-49500-442 Discarded Items Pick Up Total 110932: JUSTIN NOZNESKY 12/10/2018 110933 120618 101-22205 Escrow refund Z18-000015 2320 Glendale Cove Total 110933: Page: 7 Dec 06, 2018 09:32AM Department Invoice Amount 240.00 Public Works Department 54.48 54.48 Central Services 1,108.92 1,108.92 Sewer 540.00 540.00 120.85 120.85 Police Department 452.59 452.59 Police Department 18.64 18.64 Parks 929.88 Public Works Department 929.88 1,859.76 155.00 155.00 1,000.00 1,000.00 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Check Issue Dates: 11/27/2018 - 12/10/2018 Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Payee Issue Date Number Number KENNETH BECK 12/10/2018 110934 102318 101-42110-437 Reimburse 1st Responder Training Total 110934: KYLE KIRSCHNER 12/10/2018 110935 110218 101-42110-317 Xerxes Food KYLE KIRSCHNER 12/10/2018 110935 110218 101-42110-317 Xerxes Med Total 110935: LAKE MTKA CONSERVATION DI 12/10/2018 110936 092018 101-41110-433 4th Qtr 2018 LMCD Levy Total 110936: Laura Oakden 12/10/2018 110937 092818 101-42400-437 APA Conference Total 110937: LEAGUE OF MN CITIES 12/10/2018 110938 4166 703-49960-379 Wrongful Termination Claim Total 110938: LOGIS 12/10/2018 110939 46136 101-42110-401 Police Access to Websites LOGIS 12/10/2018 110939 46191 101-41900-329 Backups 11/18 LOGIS 12/10/2018 110939 46191 101-41900-329 Internet 11/18 LOGIS 12/10/2018 110939 46191 101-42110-329 Internet 11/18 LOGIS 12/10/2018 110939 46191 101-42110-310 Police Records 11/18 LOGIS 12/10/2018 110939 46232 101-42110-416 Cisco AMP Licensing Total 110939: LONG LAKE TRUE VALUE 12/10/2018 110940 B497264 601-49400-227 Bleach, Handi Sprayer Total 110940: MAILFINANCE 12/10/2018 110941 N7434521 101-41900-401 postage meter lease 12/16/18-3/15/19 Total 110941: MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 12/10/2018 110942 21071017 101-42110-212 Unleaded Fuel MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 12/10/2018 110942 21071018 701-49800-212 Diesel Fuel Department Police Department Police Department Police Department Mayor & Council Building & Zoning Police Department Central Services Central Services Police Department Police Department Police Department Water Central Services Police Department Page: 8 Dec 06, 2018 09:32AM Invoice Amount 82.89 14,042.75 14,042.75 114.45 114.45 2,500.00 90.00 917.00 205.50 205.50 G llA� lll 8,888.23 9.87 861.63 883.59 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Check Issue Dates: 11/27/2018 - 12/10/2018 Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Payee Issue Date Number Number MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 12/10/2018 110942 21071052 101-42110-212 Unleaded Fuel MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY 12/10/2018 110942 21071053 701-49800-212 Diesel Total 110942: MARGARET UNG 12/10/2018 110943 11302018 101-41500-331 Mileage 11/9-11/30/18 MARGARET UNG 12/10/2018 110943 11302018 101-41300-489 Staff Development Event Total 110943: MEDIACOM 12/10/2018 110944 112118 614-49840-329 Internet 12/1/18-12/31/18 Total 110944: METRO WEST INSPECTIONS S 12/10/2018 110945 1757 101-42400-310 Inspection Services Oct 2018 Total 110945: Meyers, Richard 12/10/2018 110946 120318 101-43290-800 Tree Lighting Event Total 110946: MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPA 12/10/2018 110947 20086834 101-42110-221 Medical Oxygen Total 110947: MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT 12/10/2018 110948 L15713 101-45210-402 John Deere 455 Troubleshooting MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT 12/10/2018 110948 P75704 101-45210-212 Rough Mower Maintenance MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT 12/10/2018 110948 P75707 101-45210-212 Rough Mower Maintenance MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT 12/10/2018 110948 P75780 101-45210-212 Rough Mower Maintenance MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT 12/10/2018 110948 P75938 701-49800-222 Winter Bar Oil for Chain Saw Unit #351 Total 110948: MINNETRISTA PUBLIC SAFETY 12/10/2018 110949 120318 101-33490 4th Qtr 2018 Towards Zero Death Grant Total 110949: MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATIO 12/10/2018 110950 P00009654 402-48055-404 OCB Reconstruct Department Police Department Finance Department Administration Cable Franchise Building & Zoning Special Projects -Contingencies Police Department Golf Course Golf Course Golf Course Golf Course OCB Road Reconstruction Page: 9 Dec 06, 2018 09:32AM Invoice Amount 1,779.89 202.44 3,727.55 23.98 15.27 39.25 1,187.00 1,187.00 10,176.00 10,176.00 190.61 190.61 100.21 100.21 50.00 72.32 54.24 593.78 28.87 799.21 4,134.25 4,134.25 232.49 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 10 Check Issue Dates: 11/27/2018 - 12/10/2018 Dec 06, 2018 09:32AM Department Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Payee Issue Date Number Number 608.58 Police Department 31.97 Police Department 25.18 Police Department 12.58 Total 110950: 69.73 Central Services 878.00 MN DNR OMB 12/10/2018 110951 112618 101-45210-489 2018 Water Use Total 110951: Modern Power Solutions 12/10/2018 110952 INV -0166 602-49450-403 Repair Generators Total 110952: MOUND TRUE VALUE 12/10/2018 110953 156935 101-42110-221 Cleaning Wipes, Cable, Pwr Outlet MOUND TRUE VALUE 12/10/2018 110953 156971 101-42110-240 Srews, Nuts, Bolts, Lamp MOUND TRUE VALUE 12/10/2018 110953 157062 101-42110-240 Bead Chain, WD Handle Total 110953: MUNICIPAL CODE CORPORATI 12/10/2018 110954 00320707 101-41900-352 City Code Updates Total 110954: NAVARRE HARDWARE 12/10/2018 110955 314190 701-49800-222 425 Brine Tank Vent NAVARRE HARDWARE 12/10/2018 110955 314254 225-45200-530 Flood Ice Rinks NAVARRE HARDWARE 12/10/2018 110955 314282 101-45200-223 Park Supplies NAVARRE HARDWARE 12/10/2018 110955 314324 101-42110-240 Police Kitchen NAVARRE HARDWARE 12/10/2018 110955 314327 101-41300-489 Sterno Heat Total 110955: NCPERS MINNESOTA 12/10/2018 110956 6732001220 101-21710 Para life 12/2018 Total 110956: NEOPOST USA INC 12/10/2018 110957 15575751 101-41900-201 Brush & Sponge Kit Total 110957: NEWEGG INC 12/10/2018 110958 1301666107 101-42110-221 Monitor Adapters for PD NEWEGG INC 12/10/2018 110958 1301673846 101-41900-221 Monitor for Ron - NOW Backup Department Invoice Amount 232.49 Golf Course 188.99 Police Department 188.99 Sewer 608.58 608.58 Police Department 31.97 Police Department 25.18 Police Department 12.58 69.73 Central Services 878.00 208.00 Central Services 1.99 15.28 Parks 47.98 Police Department 49.98 Administration 26.97 208.00 Central Services 24.20 24.20 Police Department 23.84 Central Services 136.63 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Check Issue Dates: 11/27/2018 - 12/10/2018 Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Payee Issue Date Number Number Total 110958: NORTHERN LIGHTS DISPLAY 12/10/2018 110959 5706 -CM 101-43290-800 Tree Lighting Event Total 110959: NORTHERN SPECIALITIES INC 12/10/2018 110960 00085614 225-45200-530 Crystal Bay Rink Prep Total 110960: O SULLIVANS HOLIDAY 547 12/10/2018 110961 1414884 701-49800-212 Non Oxy Fuel Small Engine Total 110961: OFFICE DEPOT 12/10/2018 110962 2326079200 101-42110-201 Office Supplies - PD OFFICE DEPOT 12/10/2018 110962 2326085940 101-42110-201 Office Supplies - PD OFFICE DEPOT 12/10/2018 110962 2377044570 101-41900-201 Office Supplies OFFICE DEPOT 12/10/2018 110962 2377044590 101-41900-201 Shelving OFFICE DEPOT 12/10/2018 110962 2398787770 101-42110-201 Office Supplies - PD OFFICE DEPOT 12/10/2018 110962 2398796330 101-42110-201 Towel Total 110962: OPG -3 INC 12/10/2018 110963 2985 710-49970-416 2019 Imaging Support/Licensing Total 110963: PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC 12/10/2018 110964 16150 101-45200-404 French Creek Park Vegetation mgmt Total 110964: Professional Yacht Services 12/10/2018 110965 1249 101-45200-402 Shrink Wrap - Big Island Pontoon Total 110965: RANDY OBRIEN 12/10/2018 110966 120518 101-43000-226 Safety Boots Total 110966: Department Special Projects -Contingencies Police Department Police Department Central Services Central Services Police Department Police Department Parks Parks Public Works Department Page: 11 Dec 06, 2018 09:32AM Invoice Amount 160.47 5,190.05 5,190.05 1,305.00 1,305.00 33.98 33.98 44.b/ 62.97 813.03 1,121.85 6,348.00 6,348.00 225.00 225.00 255.00 255.00 200.00 200.00 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 12 Check Issue Dates: 11/27/2018 - 12/10/2018 Dec 06, 2018 09:32AM Department Invoice Amount Central Services 337.22 Parks 434.93 Golf Course 68.05 Building & Zoning 415.29 Finance Department Check Check Invoice Invoice GL Account Description Payee Issue Date Number Number Administration 40.00 RANDYS ENVIRONMENTAL SER 12/10/2018 110967 NOVEMBER 101-41900-404 Garbage Service RANDYS ENVIRONMENTAL SER 12/10/2018 110967 NOVEMBER 101-45200-404 Garbage Service RANDYS ENVIRONMENTAL SER 12/10/2018 110967 NOVEMBER 101-45210-404 Garbage Service Total 110967: ROGER PEITSO 12/10/2018 110968 071218 101-42400-331 Mileage Remibursement Total 110968: ROGERS POLICE DEPARTMEN 12/10/2018 110969 120318 101-33490 4th Qtr 2018 Toward Zero Deaths Grant Total 110969: SANDY PETTIT 12/10/2018 110970 102718 101-41500-331 Mileage Reimbursement Total 110970: Santa Dale 12/10/2018 110971 113018 101-43290-800 Tree Lighting Event Total 110971: SCOTT OBERAIGNER 12/10/2018 110972 120318 101-43000-226 Safety Boots SCOTT OBERAIGNER 12/10/2018 110972 120418 101-41300-489 Staff Development Event Total 110972: SOUTH LAKE MINNETONKA PO 12/10/2018 110973 120318 101-33490 4th Qtr 2018 Toward Zero Deaths Grant Total 110973: SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC 12/10/2018 110974 11400.00-7 408-48800-590 CSAH 112 PH2 Landscape Total 110974: STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 12/10/2018 110975 11333875 101-42110-226 Hat & Trousers STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 12/10/2018 110975 11334194 101-42110-226 Nameplate STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 12/10/2018 110975 11334302 101-42110-402 Siren Switch Controller, Connectors STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 12/10/2018 110975 11334516 101-42110-226 Badge STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 12/10/2018 110975 11334685 101-42110-226 Jacket Department Invoice Amount Central Services 337.22 Parks 434.93 Golf Course 68.05 Building & Zoning 415.29 Finance Department 22.35 104.98 22.35 Special Projects -Contingencies 200.00 Police 200.00 Public Works Department 187.49 Administration 40.00 1,897.28 1,897.28 Police Department 104.98 Police Department 32.97 Police Department 260.00 Police Department 152.96 Police Department 129.99 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 13 Check Issue Dates: 11/27/2018 - 12/10/2018 Dec 06, 2018 09:32AM Payee Check Issue Date Check Number Invoice Number Invoice GL Account Description STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 12/10/2018 110975 11334785 101-42110-226 Jacket STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 12/10/2018 110975 11334810 101-42110-226 Shirt STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 12/10/2018 110975 11334974 101-42110-228 Marking Round STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 12/10/2018 110975 11335101 101-42110-226 Uniforms - Shirt, Pants STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 12/10/2018 110975 11335126 101-42110-226 Uniform Shirt Carrier STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 12/10/2018 110975 11335197 101-42110-226 Shirt, Carrier, Plate STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 12/10/2018 110975 11335304 101-42110-226 Badge, Key Holder, Flashlight, Belt STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 12/10/2018 110975 11335585 101-42110-226 Uniforms STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 12/10/2018 110975 11335703 101-42110-226 Vest STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 12/10/2018 110975 11336349 101-42110-226 Badge & Collar STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 12/10/2018 110975 11337456 101-42110-226 Shirt Carrier, Tag STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 12/10/2018 110975 11337825 101-42110-226 Shirt STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 12/10/2018 110975 11337994 101-42110-226 Handcuffs, Belt STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 12/10/2018 110975 11338003 101-42110-226 Uniforms STREICHERS POLICE EQUIP 12/10/2018 110975 S1319563 101-42110-226 Uniforms Total 110975: SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 12/10/2018 110976 1218LIFE 101-15998 Life Ins-Dec/2018 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 12/10/2018 110976 1218LIFE 101-21710 Life Ins-Dec/2018 SUN LIFE FINANCIAL 12/10/2018 110976 1218STD 101-21714 STD-Dec/2018 Total 110976 T W TUPY INC T W TUPY INC T W TUPY INC T W TUPY INC Total 110977: TALLEN AND BAERTSCHI Total 110978: THE HARTFORD Total 110979: THE HOME DEPOT 12/10/2018 110977 080119 101-43000-224 River Rock to Yard and Limestone 12/10/2018 110977 080119 601-49400-227 River Rock to Yard and Limestone 12/10/2018 110977 080119 602-49450-223 River Rock to Yard and Limestone 12/10/2018 110977 080119 651-49910-227 River Rock to Yard and Limestone 12/10/2018 110978 112018 101-41600-306 Prosecution Services -11/2018 12/10/2018 110979 1218LTD 101-21713 12/10/2018 110980 6024518 101-43290-800 LTD 12/2018 Tree Lighting Event Department Police Department Police Department Police Department Police Department Police Department Police Department Police Department Police Department Police Department Police Department Police Department Police Department Police Department Police Department Police Department Public Works Department Water Sewer Storm Water Law/Legal Services Special Projects -Contingencies Invoice Amount 249.99 44.99 249.90 285.96 4.00 1,128.50 164.97 403.95 39.99 15.98 128.49 123.98 128.49 169.99 89.99- � mon nn 134.67 1,061.38 664.20 1,860.25 734.30 734.30 734.30 734.29 2,937.19 2,694.99 2,694.99 1,606.34 1,606.34 259.74 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 14 Check Issue Dates: 11/27/2018 - 12/10/2018 Dec 06, 2018 09:32AM Payee Check Issue Date Check Number Invoice Number Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Amount THE HOME DEPOT 12/10/2018 110980 6024518 101-45200-225 Girl Scout Park Clean Up Parks 105.76 THE HOME DEPOT 12/10/2018 110980 6182426 234-45680-404 Return Eagle Scout Materials for Dog Park Bridge 368.46 - THE HOME DEPOT 12/10/2018 110980 7013579 101-43290-800 Tree Lighting Event Special Projects -Contingencies 182.26 THE HOME DEPOT 12/10/2018 110980 8052363 101-43290-800 Tree Lighting Event Special Projects -Contingencies 393.95 Total 110980: 573.25 UNITED FARMERS COOPERATI 12/10/2018 110981 50490 601-49400-227 Water Curb Stop Repair Parts Water 22.76 UNITED FARMERS COOPERATI 12/10/2018 110981 51083 101-43000-224 New Propane Tanks Public Works Department 97.96 Total 110981: 120.72 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVI 12/10/2018 110982 120318 101-41900-322 P.O. Box Rental Central Services 92.00 Total 110982: 92.00 US Bank Equipment Finance 12/10/2018 110983 372012989 101-41900-413 Copiers Central Services 300.00 US Bank Equipment Finance 12/10/2018 110983 372012989 101-42110-413 Copiers Police Department 200.00 US Bank Equipment Finance 12/10/2018 110983 372012989 602-49450-415 Copiers Sewer 96.76 Total 110983: 596.76 VALLEY RICH CO 12/10/2018 110984 26301 601-49400-405 Task #22526 G.V. Repair Water 4,704.02 Total 110984: 4,704.02 VANGUARD CLEANING SYSTE 12/10/2018 110985 62924 101-41900-407 Janitorial service Central Services 1,435.50 VANGUARD CLEANING SYSTE 12/10/2018 110985 62924 101-42110-407 Janitorial service Police Department 1,039.50 Total 110985: 2,475.00 VARNER MOBILE SERVICES LL 12/10/2018 110986 6979 701-49800-402 Task 23074 Unit #422 Repair 184.30 Total 110986: 184.30 VERIZON WIRELESS 12/10/2018 110987 9819016466 602-49450-321 Internet 11/24-12/23/18 Sewer 27.93 VERIZON WIRELESS 12/10/2018 110987 9819016466 601-49400-321 Internet 11/24-12/23/18 Water 27.92 Total 110987: 55.85 City of Orono Check Register - COUNCIL REPORT Page: 15 Check Issue Dates: 11/27/2018 - 12/10/2018 Dec 06, 2018 09:32AM Payee Check Issue Date Check Number Invoice Number Invoice GL Account Description Department Invoice Amount WEST HENNEPIN PUBLIC SAFE 12/10/2018 110988 120318 101-33490 4th Qtr 2018 Toward Zero Deaths Grant 6,203.39 Total 110988: 6,203.39 WESTSIDE WHOLESALE TIRE 12/10/2018 110989 826272 701-49800-222 Replacement Tires Unit # 708 558.32 Total 110989: 558.32 WILLIAMS TOWING 12/10/2018 110990 148901 231-45650-436 tow case #18012371 155.00 Total 110990: 155.00 Wright -Hennepin Coop Electric 12/10/2018 110991 3502679769 101-45200-381 Brush Site 10/1/18-11/1/18 Parks 32.46 Wright -Hennepin Coop Electric 12/10/2018 110991 3502679769 101-43000-386 Electical Service 10/1-11/1/18 Public Works Department 147.35 Wright -Hennepin Coop Electric 12/10/2018 110991 3502679769 101-45210-319 GC Security 12/1-12/31/18 Golf Course 40.76 Total 110991: 220.57 XCEL ENERGY 12/10/2018 110992 615702160 101-43000-386 Electric Service 11/1-11/14/18 Public Works Department 12.79 XCEL ENERGY 12/10/2018 110992 615705350 101-43000-386 Electric Service 11/1-11/14/18 Public Works Department 12.79 Total 110992: 25.58 Grand Totals: 324,729.18 AGENDA ITEM Item No.: Date: December 10, 2018 Item Description: Approve 2018 Interfund Loan and Transfers Presenter: Ron Olson Agenda Consent Agenda Finance Director Section: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to approve the 2018 Interfund Loan and Transfers. 2. Background. Each year the Council is requested to authorize transfer of monies between funds. These transactions fall into the following categories: A. Budgeted Transfers — Items designated in that year's budget when originally adopted for the purpose of providing support from one fund to another. B. Fund Obligations Payments from one fund to another to reimburse expenses incurred by one fund on behalf of another. This is generally for City portions of special assessments, or for equipment capital outlay. ii. Loan payments from one fund to another. Loans are generally made to construction funds for the purpose of payment of expenses incurred prior to the sale of bonds and the levying of special assessments. In addition certain loans are necessary to fund major undertakings when the fund incurring the expense does not have adequate cash flow available to complete the project. 3. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of the 2018 Interfund Loan and Transfers as presented. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the 2018 transfers and loan payments as presented on the attached schedule. Exhibits A. Schedule of 2018 Interfund Transfers and Loan Payments Prepared By: wle Reviewed By: J�)Ja Approved By: J1V City of Orono Schedule of 2018 Interfund Transfers and Loan Payments From To General Improvement & Equipment Outlay General 2017 Improvement Bond Debt Service Water Operating 2016 GO Refunding Bond Debt Service Sewer Operating 2016 GO Refunding Bond Debt Service Amount Purpose $ 280,000.00 Annual operating transfer for capital purchases $ 100,000.00 Annual transfer for debt service of the 2014 Improvement Bonds - Police Garage $ 55,000.00 Annual operating transfer for Water Fund portion of the Casco Point Road Project $ 110,000.00 Annual operating transfer for Water Fund portion of the Casco Point Road Project AGENDA ITEM Item No.: Item Description: Adopt 2019 Fee Schedule Date: December 10, 2018 Presenter: Ron Olson, Finance Director Agenda Consent Agenda Section: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to consider the 2019 fee schedule. 2. Background. The City updates its fee schedule annually. Fees for water, sewer, and storm water have been set based on a rate study completed in 2014. This rate study is in the process of being updated and may lead to additional rate changes. Changes to the current fee schedule are highlighted in yellow. In the Planning and Zoning section, the mail in fees have been removed. This is fee is no longer necessary as the result of using online permitting. There were new fees added for Interim Use Permits, Concept Review, and Zoning Disclosure. The Escrow amount was removed from the Subdivision Sketch Plan. In the Utility Fee Section, the fees have been adjusted for Sewer, Recycling, and Storm Water. 3. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of the fee schedule as presented. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Consider a motion to adopt the attached Ordinance adopting the City's Fee Schedule for 2019 and Summary Ordinance for publication. Exhibits A. Fee Schedule Ordinance B. Fee Schedule Exhibits Prepared By: .*IV Reviewed By: J1V Approved By: -TV Council Exhibit A December 10, 2018 ORDINANCE NO. _, THIRD SERIES CITY OF ORONO HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE 2019 FEE SCHEDULE AND AN ORDIANNCE REPEALING ORDINANCE NO 202, THIRD SERIES THE CITY COUNCIL OF ORONO ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Ordinances Repealed. Ordinance No. 202, Third Series, entitled Amended 2018 Fee Schedule is hereby repealed. SECTION 2. The City Council of Orono per Section 2-171 of the Municipal Code hereby ordains the fees attached as Exhibits A -G effective during the calendar year 2019: SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance establishing the 2019 Fee Schedule shall be published as a Summary Ordinance and shall be effective on January 1, 2019 and publication. ADOPTED this 10th day of December, 2018 on a vote of _ ayes and _ nays by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota. ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor Ordinance published in The Laker and The Pioneer newspapers the week of 2018. 2019 Orono Fee Schedule Table of Contents A. Planning, Building, and Zoning a B. License Fees C. Utility Fees D. Admin Offenses E. Park Fees mh� Police Adm't G. Documents Zoning Applications Commercial Marina Sanitary Sewer and Municipal Traffic/ Vehicle Golf Course Does at large Zoning documents Water Connection Zoning Permits Join Use Dock Sewer Projects Snowmobile Violations Lurton Park Animals at large Administrative documents Building Code Administration Garbage Hauler Water Connections Animals Summit Beach Large Assemble Permit Building Permits Home Occupation Water Meter and Horn Public Nuisances Bederwood & Hackberry Sport Fireworks Fields Contractual Inspections Temporary Trailers and Sewer and Water unit Open Burning Firearms Buildings adjustment charges Fire Kennel Licenses Utility Service Fees Noise Trapping Park Dedication Beer, Wine, and Liquor Municipal Water Rates Park Violations Special Events Storm Water Trunk Amusement Devices Stormwater Utility Rates Sign Violations False Alarm Public Dance Recycling Charge Juvenile Violations Fingerprinting General Admin Sump Pump Surcharge Seasonal Overweight Vehicles Police Special Services PW supplies and service Parking Copy Service Miscellaneous Photos No Parking signs Statements Fire arm storage Exhibit A Buillding, Planning, and Zoning PLANNING, BUILDING, ZONING $50.00 Structures not requiring a building permit All fees, unless otherwise noted, are application fees and are non-refundable after staff work has begun on the application. Encroachment Permit/ Agreement $150.00 All after the fact applications are double fees. All applicants are responsible for actual costs incurred by the City by its' consultants in the review of the application. $50.00 Vehicle Storage Application Adjusted Fee Escrow Notes ZONING APPLICATIONS: City Administrator may require an erosion control $1,000.00 Variable depending on Variance $275.00 $700.00 1st Extension $50.00 $700.00 Staff approved 2nd and subsequent $275.00 $700.00 City Council meeting Conditional Use Permit $275.00 $700.00 CUP amendment $275.00 $700.00 1st Extension $50.00 $709:99 Staff approved Interim Use Permit $275.00 $700.00 Site Plan Review $275.00 $700.00 Zoning Amendments including map amendments $275.00 $700.00 + Consultant fees Concept Review $275.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment $275.00 $700.00 + Consultant fees Subdivision Subdivision: Sketch Plan $275.00099 99 Subdivision: Class I and II $275.00 $1,000.00 Subdivision: Class III Prel Plat $500.00 $5,000.00 Subdivision: Final Plat $500.00 $2,500.00 Subdivision: Preliminary plat extension $350.00 Subdivision Exception $50.00 n/a Vacations Vacations: Road $275.00 $700.00 Vacation: Easement not associated with subdivisions $275.00 $700.00 Vacation: Easements associated with a subdivision $0.00 $700.00 Easement Creation (see Class I Subdivision) $700.00 Appeal of Administrative Decision $150.00 $700.00 ZONING PERMIT: Stairway to Lake $50.00 Structures not requiring a building permit $50.00 plus engineering costs Encroachment Permit/ Agreement $150.00 Tree removal in shore setback $0.00 Signs (Alteration of face, cabinent, or raceway) $50.00 Vehicle Storage $50.00 78-1577 (C) Land Alteration $50.00 $1,000.00 May also require a CUP City Administrator may require an erosion control $1,000.00 Variable depending on escrow for projects disturbing soils. project scope, but not to exceed Tent/ Canopy Permits $50.00 Application Adjusted Fee Escrow Notes Zoning discloure $ 50.00 BUILDING CODE ADMINISTRATION: Address Change Request by Owner $50.00 Based on Value Building Permits Table 65% of Building Plan Review Fee Permit Fee Minimum Fee $26.25 Based on Value Sign structure Table Based on Value Entrance monuments Table Temporary Certificate of Occupancy Escrow 3% of project value, not to exceed $10,000 City Administrator may require an erosion control escrow for projects disturbing soils. $1,000.00 Valuation based on ICC 2012 Building Valuation tables Total Valuation Fee $1.00 to $500 $26.25 $501.00 to $2,000.00 $26.25 for the first $500.00 plus $3.41 for each additional $100.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $2,000.00 $2,001.00 to $25,000.00 $77.40 for the first $2,000.00 plus $15.49 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and including 525.000.00 $25,001.00 to $50,000.00 $433.67 for the first $25,000.00 plus $11.29 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $50,000.00 $50,001.00 to $100,000.00 $715.92 for the first $50,000.00 plus $7.88 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $100,000.00 $100,001.00 to $500,000.00 $1109.92 for the first $100,000.00 plus $6.30 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $500,000.00 $500,001.00 to $1,000,000.00 $3,629.92 for the first $500,000.00 plus $5.25 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $1,000,000.00 $1,000,001.00 and up $6,254.92 for the first $1,000,000.00 plus $4.20 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof Application State Surcharge as required by State Demolition: Principal structure Demolition: Accessory structure Retaining walls Plumbing Backflow registration Plumbing minimum Mail iR pestage and handIiRg s6iFGhaFge Mechanical (All Types) Mechanical Minimum Tent/Canopy Mail iR pestage and handliRg s6iFehaFge Municipal Connection permit Sewer SAC (Sewer Availability Charge) (MCES) Water Horn Mail iR pestage and handIiRg s6iFehaFge Septic Residential System Permit, Repair Residential System Permit, New/ replace Non -Residential System Permit Subdivision site evaluation review Inspection surcharge for IRS zones (Big Island and Deering island) Reinspection fee Site inspection without permit Annual Septic Fee Septic Late Fee Contractural Inspection Service Monthly Retainer Fee (Includes clerical time) Inspection Charge Adousted Fee Escrow Notes $100.00 $1,000.00 $50.00 Based on Value Table $1,000.00 May require CUP 1.25% of project $10.00 $26.25 $_iLw 1.25% of project $26.25 $50.00 $2_49 n/a n/a n/a $50.00 $2,485.00 $50.00 Quote Basis $2--_99 $100.00 $460.00 $1,000.00 $260.00 $60.00 Per lot $30.00 $30.00 $30.00 $45.00/per year, plus late fee plus 8% interest for unpaid charges $10.00 $30/ month $30.00 per inspection plus cost of boat rental if transportation not provided. plus 30/ hour after 1st hour FIRE Application Adiusted Fee Escrow Notes Plan Review Charge Per 2008 Building Permit Fee Based on Valuation Clerical Fee (Only charged if clerical use is excessive) $20.00 per hour Fire Protection inspection Fire Code Permit certified Commercial Fire Alarm Per 2008 Building Permit Fee Based on Valuation Fire Plan review fee 65% of permit Fire Sprinkler Systems - Commercial Burning permits No Charge Reinspection $20.00 PARK DEDICATION Land Dedication Minimum Area - Subdividers shall be required to dedicate to the City for parks, playgrounds, trails, open spaces and other public purposes as a minimum that percentage of gross land area, or other such amount as may be determined by the City Council, as set forth below: (1) Residential/Agricultural/Multiple Residential Zoned Land. Dedication requirement of 8% of the land being platted or subdivided. (Exclusive of lot that includes an existing residence.) (2) Commercial/Industrial Zoned Land. Dedicated requirement of 8% of the land being platted or subdivided. Cash Contribution in Lieu of Lands. In those instances where a cash contribution is to be made by the subdivider, in lieu of a conveyance or dedication of land, the cash contribution to be contributed shall be that would otherwise have been conveyed or dedicated. The City shall account for such funds inequivalent to the fair market value of the equivalent undeveloped land a special fund named Park Dedication Funds. The City Council has established by resolution a minimum residential park fee of $3,250 per dwelling unit and a maximum of $5,550 per dwelling unit. Res. 4738 (12-10-01) The City Council has established by resolution a minimum commercial/industrial park fee of $8,125 per acre and a maximum of $13,875 per acre. Res. 4739 (12-10-01) STORMWATER AND DRAINAGE TRUNK FEES Storm water trunk fees apply to new development and redevelopment of existing properties and provide funding Application Adiusted Fee Escrow Notes for the storm water infrastructure necessary to serve the City. The trunk fee is based on the land use and acreage of the property being developed. An equivalency factor multiplier is assigned to each land use type, with a 2 -acre residential lot considered as the standard in the City with an equivalency factor of 1.0. The table below lists the storm water trunk fees per acre for the various zoning districts and land uses in the City. NEW DEVELOPMENT LAND USE Trunk Fee per Acre Single Family Residential 5 Acre Zone (maximum fee/lot = $16,150.00) $3,230.00 Single Family Residential 2 Acre Zone (maximum fee/lot = $8,060.00) $4,030.00 Single Family Residential 1 Acre Zone (maximum fee/lot = $5,250.00) $5,250.00 Single Family Residential 1/2 Acre Zone (maximum fee/lot = $3,025.00) $6,050.00 Multi Family Residential 4 Units/Acre or Less $7,275.00 Multi Family Residential Greater than 4 Units/Acre $8,490.00 Commercial or Industrial $9,690.00 1. Trunk fee charged on per lot basis. For the 5 -acre, 2 -acre, 1 -acre and 1/2 -acre zoning districts, the trunk fee shall be charged on a per -lot basis. Only acreage platted as building lots shall be charged the trunk fee. Acreage platted as road -rights-of-way or out lots for other purposes shall not be charged the trunk fee. The dollar amount calculated by multiplying (a) the number of new lots by (b) the zoning district base acreage per lot by (c) the base trunk fee per lot established in the City Fee Schedule, shall be deemed the Base Development Trunk Fee. 2. Maximum fee. For the five -acre zoning district, any lot exceeding 5.0 gross acres, including wetland, shall be charged a maximum trunk fee equal to the trunk fee for a 5.0 acre parcel. 3. Maximum fee. For the two -acre zoning districts, any lot exceeding 2.0 gross acres, including wetland, shall be charged a maximum trunk fee equal to the trunk fee for a 2.0 acre parcel. 4. Fee Credits. For the two -acre and five -acre zoning districts, a combined reduction of up to 50% of the Base Development Trunk Fee shall be allowed for the percentage of the total development property acreage in one or more of the following categories: - acreage of newly -created wetland. - acreage of stormwater ponding or similar - acreage of conservation easements resulting from 5. Maximum fee. For the one -acre zoning districts, any lot exceeding 1.0 gross acres, including wetland, shall be charged a maximum trunk fee equal to the trunk fee for a 1.0 acre parcel. 6. Maximum fee. For the 1/2 -acre zoning districts, any lot exceeding 0.5 gross acres, including wetland, shall be charged a maximum trunk fee equal to the trunk fee for a 0.5 acre parcel. 7. Multi -family and High -Density Single Family Developments. Trunk fee shall be charged on a per -acre basis, except that the following acreages will not be subject to the trunk fee: - all wetland acreage up to the delineation line - acreage of stormwater ponding or similar improvements that provide additional treatment benefits beyond what is required to treat the stormwater runoff from the development site. - acreage of conservation easements resulting from Conservation Design process Exhibit B Licenses and Miscellaneous Charges License Fees for new licenses maybe prorated; after 75% of the license period has elapsed, the fee is reduced by 50%. Type Fee COMMERCIAL MARINA LICENSE Initial Application Fee $300.00 Renewal Application & Inspection Fee $200.00 Late fee $100.00 JOINT USE DOCK LICENSE Initial Application Fee $50.00 Renewal Application Fee $20.00 Plus each slip $2.00 Late Fee $25.00 CANOE RACK RENTAL $40.00 Per Slip GARBAGE HAULER LICENSE Flat Rate $75.00 Ch. 54, Article III Per Hauler $15.00 Per Truck Transfer Fee $30.00 HOME OCCUPATION LICENSE (Level 2) $100.00 Initial Review Fee Sec. 26-76 $30.00 Annual Review Fee TEMPORARY TRAILERS & BUILDINGS $30.00 KENNEL LICENSES Sec. 62-161 thru 62-185 Commercial Application & Inspection Fee (Annual) $150.00 Residential Application & Inspection Fee (Annual) $50.00 BEER, WINE & LIQUOR LICENSES Initial Investigation $500.00 Per License Ch. 34, Article II On -Sale & Off -Sale Intoxicating Liquor Licenses Ch. 34, Article II On -Sale & Off Sale 3.2% Malt Liquor/Wine Licenses Ch. 34, Article II In state investigation Actual cost up to $10,000 Out state investigation Actual cost Off -Sale Liquor License $150.00 Sec. 34-66 On -Sale Liquor License $5,000.00 Sec. 34-66 On -Sale Wine License $2,000.00 Sec. 34-77 3.2 % Malt Liquor Off -Sale (Annual) $50.00 Sec. 34-66 3.2 % Malt Liquor On -Sale (Annual) $100.00 Sec. 34-66 Setup (Annual) $100.00 Sec. 34-126; 34-143 Club Liquor License Sec. 34-66 (weekday) $200.00 Sec. 34-66 (Sunday) $200.00 Sec. 34-66 Temporary Set-up Permit (1-4 days) $25.00 Each Sec. 34-42 Temporary On Sale 3.2% Malt Liquor (1-7 days) $25.00 Each Sec. 34-82 Temporary Off -Sale Wine License (wine auction) $25.00 Each Temporary On -Sale Wine License (1-4 days) $25.00 Each Temporary On -Sale Liquor License (1-4 days) $25.00 Each Liquor Violations (3 years immediately prior to date of most current violation) 1st Violation $500.00 2nd Violation $1,000.00 & 3 -day license suspension 3rd Violation $2,000.00 & 2 -week license suspension 4th Violation License revocation AMUSEMENT DEVICE LICENSES Per Establishment (Annual) Per Machine Fee PUBLIC DANCE LICENSE Annual License Individual License GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE LICENSES/FINES Gambling & Raffle Investigation Massage Therapy License Background Investigation Annual Renewal Solicitor/Transient Merchant/Peddler License Tobacco Licenses Licensee or Employee Violations within 24 month period 1st Offense 2nd Offense 3rd Offense & Over Penalty for Use of Tobacco Where Prohibited $100.00 + Machine fee $25.00 Each $100.00 $10.00 $10.00 $100.00 $150.00 $100.00 $100.00 + Actual costs up to $1,500.00 $125.00 $150.00 $400.00 $500.00 $100.00 Sec. 34-42 Sec. 34-42 Sec. 34-42 Sec. 34-41 Sec. 38-601 thru 38-603 Sec. 38-501 thru 38-506 Ch. 38, Article II Ch. 31, Article II Ch. 30 Ch. 50, Article II Sec. 51-5 Exhibit C Utility Rates and Fees ALL SANITARY SEWER AND MUNICIPAL WATER CONNECTION CHARGES Connection fees have been determined as a way to provide a fair and equitable recovery of the costs associated with providing water and wastewater utility services to new customers to avoid placing these costs on existing customers. The connection fee includes those portions of existing assets that will benefit new customers together with any anticipated future capital improvements constructed for the purpose of providing utility services to new customers. The connection charge applies to those properties not previously assessed for the associated utility project. MUNICIPAL CONNECTION PERMIT Sewer $50.00 SAC (Sewer Availability Charge) (MCES) $2,485.00 Water $50.00 Horn Quote Basis Mail in .,.-rage and haR dIiRg pcharg 09 Connection inspection (Water or Sewer) $100.00 Disconnection inspection (Water or Sewer) $100.00 SEWER PROJECTS Connection to existing City Sewer System: $5,100.00 $5,225.00 Connection to City Sewer in areas still within their assessment window (less than 15 years since project was assessed) shall pay a prorated amount equivalent to the assessment residences were charged at the time of the project: Connection to Sewer System in adjacent city Fee 2004 North Long Lake East Extension $15,525.00 2004 West Farm/Homestead $9,315.00 2005-1 Webber Hills/S Brown Rd Ext $14,110.00 2005-1 Dickey Lake Dr N $18,000.00 2006-1 Jamestown Road $14,990.00 2007 Farview Lane Sewer $11,315.00 Connection to Sewer System in adjacent city WATER CONNECTIONS Connection to existing City Water Main: $4,240 Connection to Water system in adjacent city Fee $1,900.00 or per current Long Connection to Long Lake Sewer System Lake Fee Schedule $1,000 or per current Wayzata Connection to Wayzata Sewer System Fee Schedule WATER CONNECTIONS Connection to existing City Water Main: $4,240 Connection to Water system in adjacent city Fee $1,900.00 or per current Long Connection to Long Lake Water System Lake Fee Schedule c"� $2,282.00 or per Connection to Wayzata Water System current Wayzata Fee Schedule WATER METER AND HORN 5/8" (3/4"x7-1/2") meter with horn including sales tax Actual Cost 3/4" (3/4"x9") meter with horn including sales tax Actual Cost 1" meter with horn including sales tax Actual Cost Larger meter Actual Cost SEWER AND WATER UNIT ADJUSTMENT CHARGES CHARGES Charges shall result from either an intensification of an existing non-residential use or a new non-residential use that replaces a former use on a property located within an area already assessed and served by municipal sewer and water. CREDIT Credit for previously assessed sewer or water units shall be applied against the total number of sewer and water units established for the new use. UNIT CHARGE Each sewer and each water unit adjustment charge shall be equal to the current Service Availability Charge established by the Metropolitan Council Wastewater Services or its successor and shall be payable to the City of Orono upon application for a building permit. UTILITY SERVICE FEES Municipal Sewer Rate By Unit: 1st 2nd By flow: Long Lake Service Base Fee Flow Wayzata Service Metered Service Base Charge Flow Unmetered Service Per property $156.80/per quarter$ 5^- /-^pen $138.60/per quarter t"32�,=g $5.80/1000 gallon plus $5.«�90 ga $15.00/per quarter/per connection $23.40/per quarter $22.59/peF 91-1 $7.00/1000 gallon $�'�090 s $23.40/per quarter $22. 9, PeF 90; $7.00/1000 gallon $6.'%099 ga $179.45/per quarter t"'��PeF g Some Properties on Mytlewood and Old Long Lake Road are not connected to water. Wayzata bills Orono based on a quarterly usage of 25,000 gallons. Charge is based on the metered rates and 25,000 gallons. MUNICIPAL WATER RATES Navarre Area (Area #1) and Hwy 12 (Area #2) Billing & Ready to Serve Chg $45.11/qtr Water Usage Rate Residential Tier 1 (0-10,000 gal) $4.03/1000 gal Tier 2 (11-25,000 gal) $5.06/1000 gal Tier 3 (>25,000 gal) $7.59/1000 gal Multi Family Tier 1 (0-50,000 gal) $4.03/1000 gal Tier 2 (51-150,000 gal) $5.06/1000 gal Tier 3 (>150,000 gal) $7.59/1000 gal Commercial Tier 1 (0-50,000 gal) $4.03/1000 gal Tier 2 (51-150,000 gal) $5.06/1000 gal Tier 3 (>150,000 gal) $7.59/1000 gal Unconnected Property Chg $45.11/qtr ready to serve/hydrant chg) Chevy Chase Area (Area #3) Billing & Ready to Serve Chg $28.86/qtr Water Usage Rate Residential Tier 1 (0-15,000 gal) $4.03/1000 gal Tier 2 (16-25,000 gal) $5.06/1000 gal Tier 3 (>25,000 gal) $7.59/1000 gal Federally Mandated Safe Drinking Water $6.36/year on second quarter billing Testing Program (Charged per service connection) Quarterly Service Charge for Non -Functioning or Inaccessible $100.00 Water Meter Bulk sale to Minnetonka Beach for Lafayette Ridge Area Water Usage Rate $4.03/1000 gallons $3.6%-o. 1990 ga Billing $44.76 $43.004 Bulk sale - All Others - $25.00 per location plus area rate per/1,000 gallons. i.e. Fill swimming pool or watering sod. Penalty for late payment of sewer/water bills - 8% after 30 days from billing date (applied to the total unpaid balance). Interest at 8% on unpaid water/sewer bills certified. Charge for Unpaid Accounts Certified for Assessment $25.00 Water Turn -On $50.00 Water Turn-off $50.00 Water System Repair/Replacement if damage caused by property owner: Labor - Current Hourly Rate Parts - At Cost STORM WATER UTILITY RATES The basic intent of storm water regulations is to minimize the impact of development on natural drainage One residential unit: Non-residential unit: RECYCLING CHARGE Recycling Cart from Waste Management SUMP PUMP SURCHARGE PUBLIC WORKS SUPPLIES & SERVICES Right of Way Permit $24.34/per quarter t".' q Based on "Residential Equivalent Factor" Right of Way Escrow (for other than Public Utility) New Street Intersections (See zoning section - Special improvement fees) On -Call Service to Other Cities Base On -Call Fee Call -Out Fee $40.00/year $36.00/year No Charge $100.00 per month $50.00/permit $1,500 $61.60/day Actual wage and equipment rates Water Meter Sales (See Building Permit Section) Wetland Buffer Signs $8.00 Exhibit D Administrative Offenses ADMINISTRATIVE OFFENSES (POLICE ADMINISTERED) Applicable Code or MN State TRAFFIC/VEHICLE OFFENSES Fee Statute (MSS) Number Unsafe Operation 66-259 Unreasonable Acceleration $60.00 66-258 Exhibition Driving $60.00 66-7 Failure to Obey Traffic Control $60.00 169.06 MSS Expired Registration $60.00 169.79 MSS Unsafe Equipment $60.00 169.47 MSS Loud Exhaust $60.00 169.69 MSS No Driver License in Possession $60.00 171.08 MSS Failure to Change Address on DL $60.00 171.11 MSS Driving to Avoid Traffic Signal $60.00 66-5 SNOWMOBILE VIOLATIONS Operation $60.00 66-159 Equipment $60.00 66-160 Hours of Operation $60.00 66-159 ANIMALS $60.00 Dog at Large $60.00 62-104 Animal License Required $60.00 62-131 Feces Clean Up $60.00 22-95 & 22-114 Barking Dog $60.00 62-10 PUBLIC NUISANCES $60.00 Public Nuisance/General Prohibition $60.00 70-4 Peace and Safety Violation $60.00 70-166 Discharge of Firearm $60.00 70-97 OPEN BURNING No Permit $60.00 58-186 Negligent Burning $60.00 58-193 No Open Burning $60.00 58-193 NOISE Loud Noise Prohibited $60.00 58-120 PARK VIOLATIONS Hours of Operation $60.00 22-89 Operating a Motor Vehicle within Park $60.00 22-92 No Permit $60.00 22-102 Feces Clean Up $60.00 22-95, 22-102 & 22-114 SIGNS VIOLATIONS $60.00 Violation of General Provisions $60.00 18-4 Sign Impoundment Fee $25.00 JUVENILE $60.00 Curfew $60.00 70-274 Possession of Tobacco $60.00 609.685 Sub 3 MSS SEASONAL OVERWEIGHT VEHICLES 1,000-9,999 lbs overweight .15 cents 169.824 Sub 1 MSS per lb over PARKING General $25.00 66-78 Seasonal 0200-0600 on $25.00 66-80 Street Prohibited Handicapped $60.00 66-85 Fire Lane $25.00 46-85 MISCELLANEOUS Watering Restrictions $60.00 610.50 Sub 15 MSS Placing Snow on Street $25.00 18-5 Exhibit E Park Fees GOLF COURSE FEES - Effective Date: 2019 Season MONDAY THRU SUNDAY RATES Individual (Regular) $18.00 Juniors (12 -18 years old) $12.00 Seniors (60 years or older) $15.00 Second Round $9.00 Children under 12 golf free with an adult SEASON PASS RATES (Unlimited Play) Base Resident Individual Season Pass $500.00 $435.00 Junior Season Pass (12 - 18 years old) $�3�00.00 $260.00 �p� Senior Season Pass (60 years or older) 1 $400.00 $330.00 Family Season Pass $590.00 c`� $575.00 (Entire Family*) Senior Fall (60 years or older) $8.00 * Family meaning: Immediate family living in the same household. Children must be 18 years old or younger. GOLF CART RENTAL RATES Motorized Cart Rental/Per Round $16.50 $18.00 Pull Carts/Per Round $3.00 Golf Clubs/Per Round $3.00 FALL RATES (Begins 15Y Monday of October) 1st Nine Holes Fall $12.00 2nd Nine Holes Fall $5.00 Junior Fall (18 years or younger) $8.00 Senior Fall (60 years or older) $8.00 CONCESSION RATES As Posted LURTON PARK PASSES Resident $25.00 Non -Resident $40.00 Passes will go on sale for the following year on Nov 15{ Passes to be prorated at 50% on August 1st. SUMMIT BEACH CANOE RACK RENTAL $40.00/slip BEDERWOOD & HACKBERRY SPORT FIELDS PARK FACILITY USE PERMIT Resident (Individual, business or group) $15.00 Non -Resident (Individual, business or group) $25.00 Exhibit F Police Administration DOGS AT LARGE - RELEASE FEE 1st Offense 2nd Offense 3rd Offense After Hours, Weekend & Holiday Release Charge ANIMALS AT LARGE (Other than dogs) - RELEASE FEE 1st Offense 2nd Offense 3rd Offense Trace & Catch Animal Trailer Charge CARE OF IMPOUNDED ANIMAL LARGE ASSEMBLY PERMIT (over 300 people) FIREWORKS PERMIT Display of Fireworks/Pyrotechnic Special Effects Sale and/or Storage of Consumer Fireworks FIREARMS DISCHARGE PERMIT Pest Control (limited use) Game Animals (limited use) Annual (Club Only) LIMITED TRAPPING PERMIT SPECIAL EVENTS PERMIT (Includes Parades, Noise Exemption, Use of Public Property) Fee is doubled if application is not received 10 business days prior to event $60.00 $80.00 $100.00 $75.00 $55.00 $65.00 $75.00 $35.00 Per Hour $55.00 +0.31/Mile (Total Distance) Actual Cost Sec. 62-104 Ch. 62, Article I $200.00 + $60.00 each additional Sec. 38-801 thru day; actual costs up to 38-803 $1,500 Sec. 70-99 $100.00 $100.00 Ch. 70, Article III $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 $20.00 Sec. 70-71 $100.00 Under 2 -AA 300 people Ch. 66, Article VI $200.00 If Over 2-00 300 people; actual costs up to $1,500 FALSE POLICE ALARM USER FEES No Charge 1st false alarm/per calendar year No Charge 2nd false alarm/per calendar year $50.00 3rd false alarm/per calendar year $100.00 4th false alarm/per calendar year $150.00 5th and over false alarm/per calendar $250.00 year FALSE FIRE ALARM USER FEES 1st false alarm/calendar year No Charge 2nd false alarm/calendar year $75.00 3rd false alarm/calendar year $250.00 4th false alarm/calendar year $350.00 5th & over false alarm/calendar year $500.00 Each Call FINGERPRINTING SERVICE $25.00 Per Application NON-RESIDENTS ONLY (CF Residents No CI POLICE SPECIAL SERVICES (Officer 119 rate) Police Reserve Officers COPY SERVICE - Police Records First Two Copies Additional Copies More than 100 pages (actual costs) PHOTOS SIGNS: "NO PARKING ORDER OF POLICE" Paper signs (no lath included) STATEMENTS $100.00 Per Hour $25.00 Per Hour $0.25 Per Page $0.25 Each $10.00 On CD $1.00 Ch. 42, Article III Ch. 42, Article III $10.00 For CD & (transcribed copy or CD when available; subject to Data Privacy Act - will be charged an actual hourly fee) FIREARM STORAGE FEES $50.00 Per Gun (Police Policy 3056) Ex G Documents and Services ZONING DEPARTMENT DOCUMENTS 2010-2030 Comprehensive Plan Municipal Code Book - complete (Ch. 1-94 w/revisions) Municipal Code Book - Portions Ch 78 only (Zoning Code) w/revisions Ch 82 only (Subdiv. Code) w/revisions Other Individual Chapters Binder GIS and City Maps Black & white Color City Street Number Maps Building & Planning Publications GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE DOCUMENTS Listing Information Assessment Search - Written (Verbal searches not given) Fax Charge Copy Service (for public City records only) 11" x 17" copies Individual copies of Ordinance Sections (1 copy) Reprint of Oversized Documents that have been microfilmed Building Plan Copies Labels from Utility Billing System Electronic Labels Information Provided on CD Information Provided on DVD Shipping/ Handling mailing of requested information Surcharge for Staff Expense in Excess of Regular Fees Professional Time Clerical Time Legal/Engineering Consultants Mileage/Copies/Postage/Etc. Returned Check Charge $75.00 $60.00 With Binder $25.00 loose $15.00 loose $ .25 Per Page $5.00 8 1/2 x 11 11x17 17x22 22x34 $0.25 $1.00 $2.00 $4.00 $2.00 $4.00 $8.00 $16.00 $0.25 $2.00 $5.00 As Posted - Prices subject to Change $10.00 $20.00 Per Parcel No charge up to 6 pages; $.25 Each Additional $ .25 Each $ 1.00 Each No Charge Cost of copying service, Cost of Copying, Messenger Service & Min. Clerical Fee of $5.00 (Entire amount to be paid upon request) $ .05 Per Label (Approximately $150.00) $10.00 Per sheet , 30 Labels max per sheet $ 10.00 Per CD $ 20.00 Per DVD $ 3.00 + cost of information (DVD, pages, etc.) $ 50.00 Per Hour $ 30.00 Per Hour Actual Billed Cost Actual Cost $30.00 AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 7 Date: December 10, 2018 Item Description: Adopt 2019 Capital Improvement Plan Presenter: Ron Olson, Finance Director Agenda Consent Agenda Section: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to consider the 2019 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). 2. Background. The City updates its CIP annually. The draft CIP was presented to the Council at the work session on November 26. The document is being presented for approval. Approval of the CIP does not authorize any expenditures. It is a planning document only. 3. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of the CIP as presented. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED: Consider a motion to approve the 2019 CIP Exhibits Exhibit A. 2019 Capital Improvement Plan Prepared By: Jijv` Reviewed By: 5b Approved By: 5b)2i Capital Improvement Plan, City of Orono Summary of Costs 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2008 Street Reconstruction Bonds 2010 Street Reconstruction Bonds 5 -Year CIP $134,825 $131,520 $133,325 $134,530 $130,000 $130,725 Planning Period $165,300 $162,900 $166,700 $161,000 CIP 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 Parks (A-1) $380,900 $374,635 $190,902 $270,000 $316,700 $4,775 $64,946 $0 $5,068 $0 $70,300 $5,378 $0 $0 $81,802 Equipment (A -2a) $186,300 $516,900 $342,800 $450,000 $253,100 $77,500 $600,000 $535,800 $37,000 $90,461 $60,000 $482,800 $577,932 $278,000 $340,376 Building (A -2b) $215,000 $54,050 $139,560 $700,760 $75,000 $320,000 $0 $209,000 $22,523 $0 $38,643 $160,000 $164,000 $168,100 $172,303 IT (A -2c) $130,274 $19,917 $17,665 $82,717 $14,923 $9,434 $15,800 $19,371 $21,048 $6,229 $17,766 $42,734 $17,700 $5,871 $39,548 Long Lake Fire (A-3) $310,250 $18,275 $42,500 $19,550 $42,500 $423,300 $72,250 $0 $106,250 $425,000 $21,250 $0 $0 $0 $0 Community Investment (A-4) $0 $0 $568,970 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Public Works - Streets -PMP(A-5) $1,131,295 $737,484 $607,152 $731,498 $383,943 $1,145,336 $959,969 $1,091,763 $1,090,436 $1,105,002 $807,703 $822,857 $838,314 $854,080 $870,162 Public Works - Water (A-6) $474,855 $800,180 $821,415 $345,845 $379,052 $277,154 $302,833 $898,628 $444,544 $520,581 $306,742 $313,031 $384,449 $325,999 $482,685 Public Works - Sanitar Sewer (A-7) $804,068 $1,096,720 $875,169 $853,924 $792,644 $797,119 $705,210 $684,650 $704,506 $724,942 $745,972 $767,616 $789,891 $812,815 $836,407 Public Works - Storm Sew_ (A-8) $708,375 $858,844 $564,777 $506,353 $577,294 $591,726 $606,519 $621,682 $637,224 $653,155 $669,484 $686,221 $703,376 $720,961 $738,985 Police (A-9) $189,314 $131,891 $175,883 $152,389 $247,911 $180,448 $157,002 $185,572 $147,659 $205,764 $198,386 $114,028 $200,689 $160,370 $229,071 Totals $4,530,630 $4,608,895 $4,346,793 $4,113,036 $3,083,067 $3,826,793 $3,484,529 $4,246,467 $3,216,258 $3,731,132 $2,936,246 $3,394,665 $3,676,351 $3,326,196 $3,791,337 Debt Service Levy Debt Issue 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2008 Street Reconstruction Bonds 2010 Street Reconstruction Bonds $132,725 $134,825 $131,520 $133,325 $134,530 $130,000 $130,725 2014 Garage, Water, Refunding Bonds $165,300 $162,900 $166,700 $161,000 $282,000 $277,000 $277,000 $278,860 $278,000 $278,000 2016 GO Rfunding $412,975 $413,275 $412,780 $416,675 Current Debt levy $711,000 1 $711,000 1 $711,000 1 $711,000 1 $416,530 1 $407,000 1 $407,725 1 $278,860 1 $278,000 1 $278,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Capital Improvement Plan, City of Orono Parks CIP Table A-1 5 -Year CIP Planning Period Project 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 Park Equipment (Navarre, Hackberry, Bederwood, Crystal Bay, Fagerness) $ 60,000 $ 64,946 $ 70,300 $ 76,095 Dock Replacement (15 year life) $ 4,500 $ 4,775 $ 5,068 $ 5,378 $ 5,707 CSAH 112 PH 3 Trail (School to CSAH 6) $ 137,000 Trail Construction along CSAR 19 to Dakota $ 115,000 Bederwood Park Improvements $ 170,000 CR 6Trail (OCB- Willow) Improvement $ 36,402 East Long Lake Road to Trail $ 120,000 Basket Ball Court Surfacing - Navarre Basket Ball Court Surfacing - Crystal Bay $ 10,000 Basket Ball Court Surfacing - Hackberry $ 10,000 Big Island ADA Trails $ 54,500 Big Island Restroom $ 37,500 Big Island Ammenities $ 53,250 Lurton Trails Hackberry Improvments $ 100,000 GC Clubhouse Foundation Restoration GC Wetland and Fairway#4 Improvements $ 160,000 GC Porch/ Patio GC Cart parking GC Fairway #1 Drainainge GC Fairway 7&8 Drainiange $ 21,400 GC Fest Tent Area GC Fire Pit $ 26,885 GC Tow Rope $ 102,000 GC Perimter Trail $ 214,700 GC Lawn Bowling $ 80,000 GC Cart Trail $ 20,000 Totals $380,900 $374,635 $190,902 $270,000 $316,700 $4,775 $64,946 $0 $5,068 $0 $70,300 $5,378 $0 $0 $81,802 Capital Improvement Plan, City of Orono Equipment. Equipment Needs Truck, Small Pick Up #210 Tractor -Mmer/ Sweeper #351 Ice Resurface Skid loader #452 Fairway Mower #600 Tee Mower #603 Small Utility T.ctor/ Vehicle w/ Sprayer #604 Greens Mower (riding) ,.Debri� Blower #607 Sp.yer #608 (included with new 604) Fertili— Spreader #608 Truck, Pickup #610 Aerator #611 Mower (Big Wand) #615 Greens / Turf Roller #618 Top Dr—er #619 Pontoon Boat #620 Building Inspection Vehicle #211 Jet Rodder #711 Utility Sewice Truck with hoist #712 Vactor Truck #713 Genemtor, Portable 50KW #850 Generator, 30KW w/ light tower #851 Generator, Portable 5OKW #856 Tel - Tractor Loader Backhoe #430 Street Sweeper 60Ford 3/4 Ton Pickup #709 Truck, 3/4 Ton Pickup w/Plow #422 Grader w/Plow Wing #423 Du.• Dump Truck w/ Plow and Sander & Hook �#42 Dump Truck w/ wing plow and Sander #426 Dump Truck w/ Plow and Sander #427 Truck, 1 Ton Dump Truck w/Plow and Sander #428 Truck, 1 Ton Dump Truck w/Plow and Sander #431 Hot Pat6 Truck #432 Tractor (ROW Mower) #450 Skid loader #45 Chipper #47 Truck, 3/4 Ton Pickup w/Plow (Sign Truck) #708 Boom/ lift 08• �� „.� Flail Mower #450A Capital Improvement Plan, City of Orono Building CIP Table A -2b 5 -Year CIP Planning Period Project 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 Public Works Roof Replacement 665760 City Hall Roof Replacement $320,000 Police Department Roof Replacement $209,000 Post Office Entry Roof Replacement $20,000 Public Works Parking Lot Repave 119560 City Hall Carpet $20,000 $22,523 Emergency Generator 175000 City Hall Parking Lot chip Seal (7years) 1 $35,000 1 1 $38,643 Public Works Security Fencing Brush Site Fencing Park and Ride (striping) $12,000 Park and Ride Chip Seal $12,050 PW Cold Storage $30,000 PW Storage Racking 20000 PW Air Handling System Refurbish $75,000 Future Facilities Improvements $160,000 $164,000 $168,100 $172,303 Totals $215,000 $54,050 $139,560 $700,760 $75,000 $320,000 $0 $209,000 $22,523 $0 $38,643 $160,000 $164,000 $168,100 $172,303 Capital Improvement Plan, City of Orono IT CIP Table A -2c 5 -Year CIP Planning Period Project 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 File Server (4 Years) $12,500 $13,500 $15,000 $16,000 PC Replacement $4,774 $4,917 $5,065 $5,217 $5,373 $5,534 $5,700 $5,871 $6,048 $6,229 $6,416 $5,534 $5,700 $5,871 $6,048 Printer (3 Years) $3,600 $3,900 $4,300 $4,700 $5,000 Switch (Every 6 Years - 4 Switches) $8,500 $9,000 1 $9,550 1 $10,100 1 $10,700 $11,350 1 $12,000 1 $12,500 Phone Replacement (10 Years) $65,000 Wireless Access Points - City Hall & PW $15,000 $17,500 Web Site Upgrade Cloud Based Servers $65,000 Fund Accounting Software Upgrade $52,000 Totals $130,274 $19,917 $17,665 $82,717 $14,923 $9,434 $15,800 $19,371 $21,048 $6,229 $17,766 $42,734 $17,700 $5,871 1 $39,548 Capital Improvement Plan, City of Orono Long Lake Fire CIP Table A-3 Project Purchase Year Expected Life (yrs) 2019 2020 5 -Year CIP 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Planning Period 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 Refurbishment of EOC & Comm Rm 2002 10 Portable Radio Replacement 2004 10 $21,500 $23,000 $23,000 $25,000 $25,000 Replace E12 with New Rescue Pumper 1990 20 Replace U13 with a New Utility Truck 2001 15 Replace Ell with New Rescue Pumper 2004 20 $475,000 Replace U11 with New Utility Truck 1999 15 $85,000 Replace U21 with New Utility Truck 2000 15 $85,000 Replace CMD2 2012 10 $50,000 Replace CMD1 2013 10 $50,000 Replace E21 with New Rescue Pumper 2003 20 $500,000 Refurbishment of Bll 2004 20 $100,000 Carpet Replacement and Paint at Station 1 2002 10 Carpet Replacement and Paint at Station 2 2004 15 $30,000 Replace SOBA 2006 15 $250,000 $300,000 Re -roof Station 1 2002 25 Re -roof Station 2 2004 25 Totals: $365,000 $21,500 $50,000 $23,000 $50,000 $498,000 $85,000 $0 $125,000 $500,000 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 City of Orono's Portion (85%) $310,250 $18,275 $42,500 $19,550 $42,500 $423,300 $72,250 $0 $106,250 $425,000 $21,250 $0 $0 $0 $0 Totals $310,250 $18,275 $42,500 $19,550 $42,500 $423,300 $72,250 $0 $106,250 $425,000 $21,250 $0 $0 $0 $0 Capital Improvement Plan, City of Orono Community Investment CIP Table A-4 5 -Year CIP Planning Period Project 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 County Road 112 Turn Back (Lighting/Sidewalks) * $568,970 Totals $0 $0 $568,970 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 *The scope of the County Road 112 Turn Back Project is yet to be determined. Therefore, the cost estimate for the project is subject to change and refinement as the project development process proceeds. The City's final share of the project will be established by the County's cost sharing policy and the final scope of the project as developed by the City of Orono and Hennepin County. Capital Improvement Plan, City of Orono Public Works - Streets CIP Table A-5 5 -Year CIP Planning Period Project Type 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 Forest Arm Lane Rehabilitation $ 364,956 Wildhurst Trail (network) Rehabilitation Vine Place Mill and Overlay West Lafayette (Shadywood to end) Rehabilitation Lyric Avenue (Livingston to Blaine) Rehabilitation Minnetonka Highlands Lane Mill and Overlay Linden Lane Realign East Long Lake Road Rehabilitation $ 153,890 Windjamer (North Arm to End) Rehabilitation $ 71,834 Fox Street (Brown -Orono Orchard) Rehabilitation $ 418,271 Smith and Lyman Avenues Mill and Overlay $ 112,146 Tonkaview Lane Mill and Overlay $ 160,694 Townline Road (Shared with Independence) Mill and Overlay $ 140,426 Chevy Chase Drive Mill and Overlay $ 276,755 Kelley Parkway - OCB Rd to StoneBay Mill and Overlay $ 72,666 Casco Circle Mill and Overlay $ 120,435 Dickenson Street Mill and Overlay $ 57,048 Glendale Drive Mill and Overlay $ 33,644 East Navarre Roads (Kenwood, Olive, Lafayette Ridge Ct.) Mill and Overlay $ 203,814 Orchard Park Road Mill and Overlay $ 142,132 Rest Point Lane Mill and Overlay $ 28,524 North Arm Drive Mill and Overlay $ 299,747 Park Lane Reconstrcut $ 29,255 Togo Road Mill and Overlay $ 73,138 Briar Street Mill and Overlay $ 43,517 Livingston & Navarre Aves Mill and Overlay $ 231,751 Willow Drive - Fox St- Brown Road Mill and Overlay $ 242,987 Forest Lake Drive Mill and Overlay $ 58,511 Preventive Maintenance CS $ 50,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 153,000 $ 156,060 $ 159,181 $ 162,365 $ 165,612 $ 168,924 $ 172,303 $ 175,749 Contracted Street Maintenace Crack Seal / Patching $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Long Range Planning -Mill and Overlay $ 250,000 $ 255,000 $ 260,100 $ 265,302 $ 270,608 $ 276,020 $ 281,541 $ 287,171 $ 292,915 Long Range Reconstructs $ 300,000 $ 306,000 $ 312,120 $ 318,362 $ 324,730 $ 331,224 $ 337,849 $ 344,606 $ 351,498 Total - Pavement Management Fund $ 1,056,295 $ 737,484 $ 607,152 $ 731,498 $ 383,943 $ 919,769 $ 750,000 $ 764,000 $ 778,280 $ 792,846 $ 807,703 $ 822,857 $ 838,314 $ 854,080 $ 870,162 Capital Improvement Plan, City of Orono Public Works - Streets CIP Table A-5 5 -Year CIP Planning Period Project Type 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 MSA Streets: Leaf Street Reclaim Ferndale Road North (Shared with Plymouth) Mill and Overlay $ 75,000 Brown Road North Mill and Overlay $ 209,969 Willow Drive - Watertown -Fox St Mill and Overlay $ 225,567 Old Crystal Bay Road - Cc Rd 112 to Cr Rd 6 Reconstruct Old Crystal Bay Road - Cc Rd 112 -Watertown Mill and Overlay $ 312,156 Old Crystal Bay Road - Watertown to Fox St Mill and Overlay $ 312,156 McCulley Road Mill and Overlay $ 327,763 Total MSA Streets: $ 75,000 $ $ - $ $ - $ 225,567 $ 209,969 $ 327,763 $ 312,156 $ 312,156 $ - $ $ - $ $ - MSADebtService $ 141,486 $ 143,111 $ 139,661 $ 141,061 $ 141,945 $ 137,468 $ 137,687 $ 142,625 Totals $ 1,131,295 $ 737,484 $ 607,152 $ 731,498 $ 383,943 $ 1,145,336 $ 959,969 $ 1,091,763 $ 1,0909436 $ 1,105,002 $ 807,703 $ 822,857 $ 838,314 $ 854,080 $ 870,162 Capital Improvement Plan, City of Orono Public Works - Water CIP Table A-6 5 -Year CIP Planning Period Project 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 North Wellhouse Scada Upgrade Navarre Plant Control Upgrade $55,200 North Water Tower Maintenance $62,500 $70,000 North Water Plant Painting $21,000 South Water Plant Painting $78,000 Navarre Plant Salt Brine Tank Rehab. $400,000 North Distribution Extension West of OCB $120,000 Well #3 Inspection & Maintenance (every 10 yrs) Well #4 Inspection & Maintenance (every 10yrs) $20,000 Well #1 Rehabilitation (every 20 yrs) $150,000 Well #2 Rehabilitation (every 20yrs) $150,000 Well #3 Rehabilitation (every 20 yrs) $150,000 Well #3 Screen $92,000 South Tower Repaint and Rehabilitation $350,000 $60,000 $65,000 Watermain replacement Old Crystal Bay Road W/Road West Lafeyette Main Replacement (w/Road) Water Main Replacement CSAH15/19 W/Road $169,855 Watermain replacement CSAH 19 S of CSAH 15 $181,000 Watermain replacement Casco Circle W/Road $357,700 Watermain replacement E.Navarre Streets W/Road $327,880 Watermain replacement Togo Road W/Road $200,060 Watermain Loop Concordia $230,000 Water Valve Re lacemetns 4 / Year $24,000 $24,600 $25,215 $25,845 $26,492 $27,154 $27,833 $28,528 $29,242 $29,973 $30,722 $31,490 $32,277 $33,084 $33,911 Watermain Replacement $250,000 $255,000 $260,100 $265,302 $270,608 $276,020 $281,541 $287,171 $292,915 $298,773 Fixed Station Meter Reading System Water Meter Replacement (every 15yr) $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 $90,000 Totals $474,855 $800,180 $821,415 $345,845 1 $379,052 $277,154 $302,833 $898,628 $444,544 $520,581 $306,742 $313,031 $384,449 $325,999 $482,685 Capital Improvement Plan, City of Orono Public Works - Sanitary Sewer CIP Table A-7 5 -Year CIP Planning Period Project 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 Sewer Rehabilitation $281,377 $289,819 $298,513 $307,469 $316,593 $326,194 $335,979 $346,059 $356,441 $367,134 $378,148 $389,492 $401,177 $413,212 $425,609 Annual Sewer Televising (1/5 of City Each Year) $48,690 $50,151 $51,655 $53,205 $54,801 $56,445 $58,139 $59,883 $61,679 $63,530 $65,436 $67,399 $69,421 $71,503 $73,648 Lift Station #5 Generator Lift Station #9 Generator Lift Station #15 Generator $75,000 Lift Station #1 Generator $75,000 Lift Station #3 Generator $75,000 Lift Station #13 Generator $75,000 Lift Station #16 Generator $75,000 Lift Station #25 Generator $75,000 Lift Station #11 Generator $75,000 Lift Station #17 Generator $75,000 Lift Station #19 Generator $75,000 Lift Station #23 Generator $75,000 Lift Station #27 Generator $75,000 Lift Station #29 Generator $75,000 Grinder Station #2 Rehab Lift Station #9 Rehab Lift Staion #1 Rehab $20,000 Grinder Station #10 $40,000 Grinder Station #9 Rehab $40,000 Lift Station #13 Rehab $60,000 Lift Station #3 Rehab $60,000 Lift Station #11 Rehab $62,000 Capital Improvement Plan. ON of Orono Public Works - Sanitary Sewer CIP Table A-7 5 -Year CIP Planning Period Project 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 Lift Station #5 Rehab $62,000 Lift Station #4 Rehab $64,000 Lift Station #16 Rehab $64,000 Lift Station #25 Rehab $65,600 Lift Station #28 Rehab $65,600 Lift Station #2 Rehab $67,240 Lift Station #6 Rehab $67,240 Lift Station #30 Rehab $68,921 Grinder Station #8 Rehab $40,000 Lift Station #10 Rehab $68,921 Lift Station Rehab (2 per ear) $142,127 $146,391 $150,783 $155,306 $159,965 $164,764 $169,707 $174,798 Northern Utilities Expansion (W/CSAH 113 PH3) $436,000 Lift Station Monitoring (Mission) $26,000 $26,000 $26,000 Forest Arms Main Rehab w/ rd $18,000 Windjammer Main Rehab with road $24,750 West Laffayette Main Rehab with Road construction Old Crystal Bay Road N Main Rehab ForceMain replacement with CSAH 19/15 Porject 180000 Forcemain Replacement Tonkawa PH2 $225,000 Forcemain Replacement Tonkawa PH3 $215,250 Forcemain Replacement Tonkawa PH4 139950 Sewer Main Replacements $130,000 $133,250 $136,581 $139,996 $143,496 $147,083 $150,760 $154,529 $158,392 $162,352 Totals $804,068 $1,096,720 1 $875,169 1 $853,924 1 $792,644 1 $797,119 1 $705,210 1 $684,650 1 $704,506 1 $724,942 1 $745,972 1 $767,616 1 $789,891 1 $812,815 $836,407 Capital Improvement Plan, City of Orono Public Works - Storm Sewer CIP Table A-8 5 -year CIP Planning Period Project 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 Storm Watershed Delineation and Pond Assessments $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Forest Arms Lane (w/road reconstruct) $ 91,804 Windjammer Stormwater(w/road reconstruct) $ 10,775 West Lafayette Stormwater (w/road reconstruct) Lyric Avenue (w/ Road reconstruct) Wildhurst Trail (w/ Road reconstruct) Minnetonka Highlands (w/Road reconstruct) Old Crystal Bay (6-112) (W/Rd Reconstruction) Vine place (w/ Road reconstruct) East Long Lake S (w/ Road reconstruct) $ 34,210 Windjammer (North Arm to End) (w/ Road reconstruct) $ 71,834 Smith and Lyman Avenue (w/ Road reconstruct) $ 66,321 Ferndale Rd N (w/M&O) $ 50,000 Tonkaview Lane (w/ Road reconstruct) $ 87,531 Chevy Chase Drive (w/ Road reconstruct) (HA -1) $ 146,330 Casco Circle (w/ M&O) $ 122,065 East Navarre Roads (w/ M&O) $ 30,572 Kelley Parkway - OCB Rd to Stone Bay (w/ Road M&O) $ 5,450 Dickenson Street (w/ Road reconstruct) $ 8,557 Glendale Drive (w/ Road reconstruct) $ 5,047 Orchard Park Road (w/ Road reconstruct) $ 21,320 Rest Point Lane (w/ Road reconstruct) $ 4,279 Park Lane (w/ Road reconstruct) $ 8,777 North Arm Drive (w/ Road reconstruct) $ 44,962 Willow Dr (Fox -Brown) (w/ Road reconstruct) $ 34,763 Street Stormwater Improvements $ 140,000 $ 143,500 $ 147,088 $ 150,765 $ 154,534 $ 158,397 $ 162,357 $ 166,416 $ 170,576 $ 174,841 $ 179,212 Lang Lake Ravine Stabilization (SWMP 7) Eat Long Lake Road Shoreline Restoration $ 102,500 Casco Point Park Outlet SWMP 0-1) $ 58,000 Casco cove Outlet (SWMP 0-2) $ 80,000 Casco Point Park Bioretention Basin SWMP CB -1) $ 55,000 Capital Improvement Plan, City of Orono Public Works - Storm Sewer CIP Table A-8 5 -year CIP Planning Period Project 2019 2020 2021 2022 1 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 South Casco Point Road Sump (SWMP CB -2) $ 36,000 Casco cove Bioretatnion Basin (CB -3) $ 57,000 East Long Lake Road N Improvements (SWMP LL -1) $ 82,000 Cherry Place Ravine Improvement (SWMP NA -1) $ 23,000 OCB Pipe U sizing (Countryside south) $ 88,500 Kelly Avenue Drainage Improvements Surface Water Management Projects $ 100,000 $ 160,000 $ 164,000 $ 168,100 $ 172,303 $ 176,610 $ 181,025 $ 185,551 $ 190,190 $ 194,944 $199,818 $204,814 $209,934 Storm Sewer Improvements/ Replacements $ 200,000 $ 205,000 $ 210,125 $ 215,378 $ 220,763 $ 226,282 $ 231,939 $ 237,737 $ 243,681 $ 249,773 $ 256,017 $ 262,417 $268,978 $275,702 $282,595 Pond Cleaning/Maintenance 1/ ear) $ 50,000 $ 51,250 $ 52,531 $ 53,845 $ 55,191 $ 56,570 $ 57,985 $ 59,434 $ 60,920 $ 62,443 $64,004 $65,604 $67,244 Totals $ 708,375 1 $ 858,844 $ 564,777 1 $ 506,353 1 $ 577,2941 $ 591,726 1 $ 606,519 1 $ 621,682 1 $ 637,224 1 $ 653,155 1 $ 669,484 1 $ 686,221 1 $ 703,376 1 $ 720,961 1 $ 738,985 Capital Improvement Plan, City of Orono Police CIP Table A-9 Project Purchase Year Expected Life (yrs) 5 -Year CIP Planning Period 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 1 2030 2.031 2032 2033 Squad 232 (Ford SUV) CSO 2014 5 $39,400 $40,500 $43,000 Squad 233 (Ford SUV) 2014 5 $40,000 $42,500 $44,000 Squad 242 (Ford SUV) 2015 5 $40,000 $42,500 $45,000 Squad 236 (Ford SUV) 2015 5 $40,000 $42,500 $44,000 S uaed 238 (Ford SUV) 2014 5 $38,000 $40,500 $43,000 Squad 235 (Durango) Chief 2014 5 $38,500 $41,000 $43,500 Squad 240 (Charger 2015 5 $40,000 $42,500 $45,000 Squad 237 (Ford SUV) 2014 5 $38,000 $40,500 $43,000 S uard 243 (Ford SUV) 2015 5 $38,500 $41,000 $43,500 Squad 229 (Charger) 2013 5 $40,000 $42,000 $44,000 Squad 227 (Charger) 2012 5 $40,000 $42,000 $44,000 Squad 228 (Charger) 2012 5 $40,000 $42,000 $44,000 Squad 841 (Mound) 2011 5 $38,000 $40,500 $43,000 Squad 843 (Mound) Tahoe/Special Use 2010 5 $40,000 $42,500 $45,000 Squad 223 (Escape) Investigations DP 2010 5 $40,000 $42,500 $45,000 Squad 853 (Equinoux) Investigations 2008 5 $39,000 $40,000 $41,000 Squad 230 Tahoe SRO/Reserves 2013 5 $40,000 $42,500 $44,000 Squad 231 WMDTF (Forfeiture Funds) 2008 TBD $38,500 $41,000 ATV Yamaha Grizzly 450 2004 TBD ERU Vehicle (Ford Ambulance) 234 2005 TBD Technology Replacement $10,609 $10,927 $11,255 $11,593 $11,941 $12,299 $12,668 $13,048 $13,439 $13,842 $14,258 $14,685 $15,126 $15,580 $16,047 Weapons -Rifles $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 Weapons - Handguns $20,000 $20,000 Supported or Partially Funded through Police Account in the PIR Fund Mobile Radios $50,000 Squad Video Cameras $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 Mobile Data Computer $5,305 $5,464 $5,628 $5,796 $5,970 $6,149 $6,334 $6,524 $6,720 $6,921 $7,129 $7,343 $7,563 $7,790 $8,024 Portable Radios Police Records Updgrade (LOGIS) Totals $189,314 $131,891 $175,883 $152,389 $247,911 $180,448 $157,002 $185,572 $147,659 $205,764 $198,386 $114,028 $200,689 $160,370 $229,071 NOTES: *Funding for the Police CIP is accounted for in the General Fund to accurately charge our contract cities for the cost of policing. Capital Improvement Plan, City of Orono Park Fund Current Balance: $797,067 Current Balance: $468,831 Table B-3 Table B-2 Table B-1 Project 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Project 2019 1 Project 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 Operation and Maintenance 11) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 CIP Expenditures $339,500 $347,750 $110,902 $110,000 $0 $4,775 $64,946 $0 $5,068 $0 $70,300 $5,378 $0 $0 $81,802 Total Expenses $339,500 $347,750 $110,902 $110,000 $0 $4,775 $64,946 $0 $5,068 $0 $70,300 $5,378 $0 $0 $81,802 $26,885 1 $80,000 $160,000 $316,700 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Expenses $572,974 Revenues (2) $10,500 $4,681 $1,250 $153 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Annual Balance ($329,000) ($343,069) ($109,652) ($109,847) $0 ($4,775) ($64,946) $0 ($5,068) $0 ($70,300) ($5,378) $0 $0 $211000 Year End Cash Balance 1 $468,067 $124,998 $15,346 ($94,501) ($94,501) ($99,276) ($164,222) ($164,222) ($169,290) ($169,290) ($239,590) ($244,967) ($244,967) (5244,967) ($326,769) Improvement/Equipment Outlay Fund Current Balance: $370,883 Current Balance: $468,831 Table B-3 Table B-2 Project 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Project 2019 1 2020 1 2021 2022 2023 1 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 Equipment, CIP $186,300 $516,900 $342,800 $450,000 $253,100 $77,500 $600,000 $535,800 $37,000 $90,461 $60,000 $482,800 $577,932 $278,000 $340,376 Building CIP $215,000 $54,050 $139,560 $700,760 $75,000 $320,000 $0 $209,000 $22,523 $0 $38,643 $160,000 $164,000 $168,100 $172,303 IT, CIP $130,274 $19,917 1 $17,665 $82,717 $14,923 $9,434 $15,800 $19,371 $21,048 $6,229 $17,766 $42,734 $17,700 $5,871 $39,548 Golf, CIP $41,400 $26,885 1 $80,000 $160,000 $316,700 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Expenses $572,974 $617,752 1 $580,025 $1,393,477 $659,723 $406,934 $615,800 $764,171 $80,571 $96,690 $116,409 $685,534 $759,632 $451,971 $552,226 1 $101,973 $187,993 Revenues (Transfer) $211000 $215,000 $255,000 $315,000 $315,000 $315,000 $315,000 $315,000 $315,000 $315,000 $315,000 $315,000 $315,000 $315,000 1 $315,000 Tmnsferfrom Enterprise Funds $5,000 $400,000 $83,000 $450,000 $0 $37,000 $600,000 $145,500 $0 $0 $0 $80,000 $0 Annual Balance ($352,974) ($2,752) 1 ($242,025) ($628,477) ($344,723) ($54,934) $299,200 ($303,671) $234,429 $218,310 $198,591 ($290,534 ($444,632) ($136,971) ($237,226) Year End Cash Balance $115,857 $113,105 ($128,920) ($757,397) ($1,102,120) ($1,157,055) ($857,855) ($1,161,526) ($927,097) ($708,787) ($510,196) ($800,730) ($1,245,363) ($1,382,334) 1 ($1,619,560) Improvement/Equipment Outlay Fund - Long Lake Fire Account Current Balance: $370,883 Table B-3 Project 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 Long Lake Fi re CIP $310,250 $18,275 $42,500 $19,550 1 $42,500 1 $423,300 1 $72,250 1 $0 1 $106,250 1 $425,000 1 $21,250 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Expenses $310,250 $18,275 1 $42,500 1 $19,550 1 $42,500 1 $423,300 1 $72,250 1 $0 1 $106,250 1 $425,000 1 $21,250 1 $0 $0 $0 $0 Revenue -General Fund Transfer (2) $85,000 $85,000 $85,000 $85,000 $85,000 $85,000 $85,000 $85,000 $85,000 $85,000 $85,000 $85,000 $85,000 $85,000 $85,000 Revenues-Interest(21 $5,000 $1,506 $2,189 $2,636 $3,316 $3,775 $429 $561 $1,417 $1,218 $0 $0 $0 $168 $1,020 Annual Balance ($220,250) $68,231 $44,689 $68,086 $45,816 ($334,525) $13,179 $85,561 ($19,833) ($338,782) $63,750 $85,000 $85,000 $85,168 $86,020 Year End Cash Balance $150,633 $218,864 1 $263,553 $331,639 $377,455 1 $42,929 $56,109 $141,670 $121,837 ($216,945) ($153,195) ($68,195) $16,805 1 $101,973 $187,993 Community Investment 4Table Annual Expenditures Community Improvement CIP ----- ---------- Capital Improvement Plan, City of Orono MSA Fund Current Fund Balance: $0 State MSA Construction Balance= $550,000 Table B -5b Table B -5a Project 2019 2020 Project 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 Annual Expenditures (MSA CIP) $75,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $225,567 $209,969 $327,763 $312,156 $312,156 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Annual MSA Maintenance Payment to the City $39,438 $39,438 $39,438 $39,438 $39,438 $39,438 $39,438 $39,438 $39,438 $39,438 $39,438 $39,438 $39,438 $39,438 $39,438 Debt Service (interest) - from MSA maintenance account. $36,288 $33,138 $29,838 $26,388 $22,938 $19,188 $14,813 $10,125 $5,250 $520,581 $306,742 $313,031 $384,449 $325,999 $482,685 Debt Service (Principal) - from MSA Construction Account $105,000 $110,000 $115,000 $115,000 $120,000 $125,000 $125,000 $130,000 $140,000 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 Total Expenses $255,725 $182,575 $184,275 $180,825 $182,375 $409,192 $389,219 $507,326 $496,844 1 $351,594 1 $39,438 1 $39,438 1 $39,438 1 $39,438 1 $39,438 $544,450 $544,450 $544,450 $544,450 $544,450 $544,450 $544,450 Annual Ba lance ($511,845) ($193,034) ($62,702) ($187,048) $460,507 ($75,319) $94,450 $80,450 $66,170 Yearly Allocation- MSA Maintenance $123,833 $123,833 $123,833 $123,833 $123,833 $123,833 $123,833 $123,833 $123,833 $123,833 $123,833 $123,833 $123,833 $123,833 1123,833 Yearly Allocation- MSA Construction $201,751 $201,751 $201,751 $201,751 $201,751 $201,751 $201,751 $201,751 $201,751 $201,751 $201,751 $201,751 $201,751 $201,751 $201,751 Annual Balance $69,859 $143,009 $141,309 $144,759 $143,209 ($83,608) ($63,635) ($181,742) ($171,260) ($26,010) $286,147 $286,147 $286,147 $286,147 $286,147 Year End Cash Balance $69,859 $212,868 1 $354,177 $498,936 $642,145 1 $558,537 $494,902 $313,161 $141,901 $115,892 $402,038 $688,185 $974,331 $1,260,478 $1,546,624 Pavement Management Fund Current Balance: $462,233 $774,118 Table B -5b Table B-6 Project 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 Annual Operation and Maintenance 11) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0. $0 $0 CIP Expenditures $1,056,295 $737,484 $607,152 1 $731,498 1 $383,943 1 $919,769 $750,000 $764,000 $778,280 $792,846 $807,703 $822,857 $838,314 $854,080 $870,162 Total Expenses $1,056,295 $737,484 $607,152 1 $731,498 1 $383,943 $919,769 $750,000 $764,000 $778,280 $792,846 $807,703 $822,857 $838,314 $854,080 $870,162 $520,581 $306,742 $313,031 $384,449 $325,999 $482,685 Total Expenses $1,457,565 $1,826,083 $1,868,040 $1,413,736 $1,472,765 $1,337,760 $1,385,916 $2,006,289 Revenues(1) $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 $300,000 Pavement Management Levy $544,450 $544,450 $544,450 $544,450 $544,450 $544,450 $544,450 $544,450 $544,450 $544,450 $544,450 $544,450 $544,450 $544,450 $544,450 Annual Ba lance ($511,845) ($193,034) ($62,702) ($187,048) $460,507 ($75,319) $94,450 $80,450 $66,170 $51,604 $36,747 $21,593 $6,136 ($9,630) ($25,712) Year End Cash Balance ($49,612) ($242,646) ($305,348) ($492,396) ($31,889) ($107,208) ($12,758) $67,692 $133,862 $185,466 $222,213 $243,807 $249,943 $240,313 $214,602 Water Fund Current Balance: $774,118 Table B-6 Project 2019 2020 2021 2022 1 2023 1 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 Annual Operation and Maintenance (1) $847,710 $868,903 $890,625 $912,891 $935,713 $959,106 $983,084 $1,007,661 $1,032,852 $1,058,674 $1,085,140 $1,112,269 $1,140,076 $1,168,578 $1,197,792 Debt Service $135,000 $157,000 $156,000 $155,000 $158,000 1 $101,500 $100,000 $100,000 $100,500 $104,000 $100,600 $103,000 $0 $0 $0 CIP Expenditures $474,855 $800,180 $821,415 $345,845 1 $379,052 1 $277,154 $302,833 $898,628 $444,544 $520,581 $306,742 $313,031 $384,449 $325,999 $482,685 Total Expenses $1,457,565 $1,826,083 $1,868,040 $1,413,736 $1,472,765 $1,337,760 $1,385,916 $2,006,289 $1,577,896 $1,683,254 $1,492,483 $1,528,300 $1,524,524 $1,494,577 $1,680,477 Total Expenses $2,538,243 $2,971,499 $2,723,068 $2,712,983 $3,145,429 $2,634,724 $2,623,755 $2,615,283 $2,683,406 $2,753,314 $2,825,054 $2,898,674 $3,054,226 $6,103,516 $6,262,648 Revenues(1) $681,550 $701,997 $723,056 $744,748 $767,091 $790,103 $813,806 $838,221 $863,367 $889,268 $915,946 $952,584 $981,162 $1,010,596 $1,040,914 Add back Depreciation $207,400 $225,800 $241,400 $262,700 $272,300 $294,000 $294,000 $294,000 $294,000 $294,000 $294,000 $294,000 $294,000 $294,000 $294,000 Assessments $10,387 $10,387 $10,387 $10,387 $10,387 $10,387 $10,387 $10,387 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Annual Balance ($558,228) ($887,899) ($893,197) ($395,901) ($422,987) ($243,270) ($267,723) ($863,682) ($420,529) ($499,986) ($282,536) ($281,716) ($249,363) ($189,980) ($345,562) Year End Cash Balance $215,890 ($672,009) ($1,565,206) ($1,961,1071 ($2,384,095) ($2,627,364) ($2,895,087) ($3,758,769) ($4,179,298) ($4,679,284) ($4,961,821) ($5,243,536) ($5,492,899) ($5,682,879) ($6,028,442) Sewer Fund Current Balance: $2,585,816 Table B-7 Project 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 Operation and Maintenance (1) $1,624,175 $1,664,779 $1,706,399 $1,749,059 $1,792,785 $1,837,605 $1,883,545 $1,930,634 $1,978,900 $2,028,372 $2,079,081 $2,131,058 $2,184,335 $2,238,943 $2,294,917 Debt Service $110,000 $110,000 $110,000 $110,000 $110,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 CIP Expenditures $804,068 $1,096,720 $875,169 $853,924 $792,644 $797,119 $705,210 $684,650 $704,506 $724,942 $745,972 $767,616 $789,891 $812,815 $836,407 Transfer to Equipment Fund for Sewer Equip $0 $100,000 $31,500 $0 $450,000 $0 $35,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $80,000 $3,051,758 $3,131,324 Total Expenses $2,538,243 $2,971,499 $2,723,068 $2,712,983 $3,145,429 $2,634,724 $2,623,755 $2,615,283 $2,683,406 $2,753,314 $2,825,054 $2,898,674 $3,054,226 $6,103,516 $6,262,648 Revenues (1) $1,427,010 $1,484,090 $1,543,454 $1,605,192 $1,669,400 $1,736,176 $1,805,623 $1,877,848 $1,952,962 $2,031,080 $2,112,323 $2,196,816 $2,284,689 $2,376,077 $2,471,120 Add back Depreciation $330,000 $353,600 $382,200 $402,000 $416,200 $439,300 $439,300 $439,300 $439,300 $439,300 $439,300 $439,300 $439,300 $439,300 $439,300 Assessments $35,349 $35,349 $30,368 $26,934 $24,902 $17,569 $17,569 $10,939 $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 i ($675,682) ($660,205) Annual Balance ($745,684) ($1,098,460) ($767,046) ($678,856) ($1,034,927) ($441,679) ($361,263) ($287,197) ($289,144) ($282,933) ($273,430) ($262,558) ($330,237) ($3,963,8211 ($4,012,433) Year End Cash Balance $1,839,932 $741,473 ($25,573) 1 ($704,429) ($1,739,357) ($2,181,036) ($2,542,299) ($2,829,495) ($3,118,640) ($3,401,573) ($3,675,003) ($3,937,561) ($4,267,798) 1 ($8,231,619) ($12,244,052) Capital Improvement Plan, City of Orono Storm Water Fund Current Balance: Current Balance: $1,763,437 Available for Police Purchases= $268,823 Table B-9 Table B-8 Project 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Project 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023w$Ol 2033 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 Operation and Maintenance (1) $356,810 $365,730 $374,874 $384,245 $393,851$413,790 $55,970 $6,149 $424,135 $434,738 $445,607 $456,747 $468,166 $479,870 $491,867 $504,163 CIP Expenditures $708,375 $858,844 $564,777 $506,353 $577,294$606,519 $621,682 $637,224 $653,155 $669,484 $686,221 $703,376 $720,961 $738,985 Transferto Equipment Fund for Storm Equip $0 $100,000 $0 $75,000 $0$12,000 $11,882 $11,929 1 $600,000 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 1 $0 Total Expenses $1,065,185 $1,324,574 $939,651 $965,598 $971,145 $995,424 $1,032,310 $1,645,817 $1,071,963 $1,098,762 $1,126,231 $1,154,387 $1,183,246 $1,212,827 1 $1,243,148 1 $1,192,932 $1,197,518 $1,201,931 $1,206,160 $1,210,198 Revenues (1) $296,160 $325,776 $358,354 $394,189 $433,608 $476,969 $524,666 $577,132 $634,845 $698,330 $768,163 $844,979 $929,477 $1,022,425 $1,124,667 Add back depreciation $53,500 $62,000 $74,900 $53,300 $91,600 $100,700 $100,700 $100,700 $100,700 $100,700 $100,700 $100,700 $100,700 $100,700 $100,700 Annual Balance 1 (5715,525) 1 ($936,798) 1 ($506,397) ($488,110) ($445,937) ($417,755) ($406,944) ($967,985) ($336,417) ($299,732) ($257,368) ($208,708) ($153,069) ($89,703) ($17,781) Year End Cash Balance 1 $1,047,912 1 $111,114 1 ($395,283) ($883,393) ($1,329,330) ($1,747,085) ($2,154,029) ($3,122,015) ($3,458,432) ($3,758,164) ($4,015,532) ($4,224,240) ($4,377,309) ($4,467,012) ($4,484,793) Permanent Improvement Revolving (PIR) Fund Current Balance: $1,244,883 Amount Available for Police Purchases= $268,823 Table B-9 Project 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 Police Expenses $20,305 $5,464 $5,628 $20,796 1 $55,970 1 $6,149 $21,334 $6,524 $6,720 $21,921 $7,129 $7,343 $7,563 $7,790 $8,024 Total Expenses $20,305 $5,464 $5,628 $20,796 $55,970 $6,149 $21,334 $6,524 $6,720 $21,921 $7,129 $7,343 $7,563 $7,790 $8,024 Revenues $5,000 $12,296 $12,364 $12,431 $12,348 $11,912 $11,969 $11,876 $11,929 $11,981 $11,882 $11,929 $11,975 $12,019 $12,062 Ann ual Balance ($15,305) $6,832 $6,737 ($8,365) ($43,622) $5,762 ($9,365) $5,352 $5,210 ($9,940) $4,753 $4,587 $4,412 $4,229 $4,038 Year End Cash Balance $1,229,579 1 $1,236,411 $1,243,147 $1,234,782 $1,191,160 $1,196,922 $1,187,557 1 $1,192,909 $1,198,119 $1,188,179 1 $1,192,932 $1,197,518 $1,201,931 $1,206,160 $1,210,198 NOTES: (1) Expenses and Revenues are based on the City's 2011 budget. For Planning purposes a 2.5%annual inflation factor has been used to project future costs. (2) Revenues are based on a 1.5% increased contribution starting in 2016 and adding a 1% interest earned on the previous year's balance. AGENDA ITEM Item No.: Date: December 10, 2018 Item Description: Close Fund 318 — 2005 GO HRA Public Facilities Bond Presenter: Ron Olson, Agenda Consent Agenda Finance Director Section: 1. Purpose. To Close Fund 318, 2005 GO HRA Public Facilities Bond. 2. Background. The 2005 HRA Public Facilities Bond Fund is a debt service fund that was created to fund debt payments on the 2005 HRA Public Facilities (Big Island) Revenue Bonds. These bonds were been paid in full as of February lst, 2018 and the fund is no longer needed for debt service. The fund's current fund balance is $44,419.22 and is available for alternate uses. 3. Staff Recommendation. Staff is recommending transferring the assets of the fund to the Big Island Fund to be used at Big Island Nature Park. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt a Resolution to close the 2005 HRA Public Facilities Fund and to transfer the equity to the Big Island Fund. Exhibits A. Resolution Closing the 2005 HRA Public Facilities Bond Fund Prepared By: J?Y(g Reviewed By: -Sbja Approved By: -Sb)X CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION TO CLOSE THE 2005 HRA PUBLIC FACILITES BOND FUND WHEREAS, the 2005 HRA Public Facilities Bond Fund was established to service the debt on the 2005 HRA Public Facility Revenue Bonds; and WHEREAS, the 2005 HRA Public Facility Revenue Bonds have been paid in full; and WHEREAS, the fund balance of the 2005 debt service fund is available to be used to fund other City need; and WHEREAS, 2005 HRA Public Facility Bonds were originally sold to fund the purchase and establishment of the Big Island Nature Park; and WHEREAS, the Big Island Fund has been established to fund activities and improvements at Big Island Nature Park; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the 2005 HRA Public Facilities Bond Fund be closed and that the remaining equity in the fund be transferred to Big Island Fund. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, at a regular meeting held December 10, 2018. ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 9 Date: December 10, 2018 Item Description: Close Fund 319 — 2008 GO Street Reconstruction Bond Presenter: Ron Olson Agenda Consent Agenda Section: 1. Purpose. To close Fund 319 — 2008 GO Street Reconstruction Bond Fund. 2. Background. The 2008 GO Street Reconstruction Bond Fund is a debt service fund that was created to fund debt payments on the 2008 GO Street Reconstruction Bonds. In December of 2016 the City issued the 2016 GO Refunding Bonds to refund the 2008 bonds which were paid in full as of February 1St, 2017. The 2008 fund's current balance is $87,666.00 and is needed for debt service on the 2016 GO Refunding Bonds. 3. Staff Recommendation. Staff is recommending the closing of the 2008 bond fund and transferring the assets of the fund to the 2016 refunding bond fund. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt A Resolution to close the 2008 GO Street Reconstruction Bond Fund and to transfer the equity to the 2016 GO Refunding Bonds for debt service. Exhibits A. Resolution Closing the 2008 GO Street Reconstruction Bond Fund Prepared By: J?Y(g Reviewed By:.b)X1 Approved By: -Sb)X CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION TO CLOSE THE 2008 GO STREET RECONSTRUCTION BOND FUND WHEREAS, the 2008 GO Street Reconstruction Bond Fund Bond Fund was established to service the debt on the 2008 GO Street Reconstruction Bonds; and WHEREAS, the 2008 GO Street Reconstruction Bonds have been refunded and paid in full by the 2016 GO Refunding Bonds; and WHEREAS, the fund balance of the 2008 debt service fund is needed for the debt service of the 2016 GO Refunding Bonds; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the 2008 GO Street Reconstruction Bond Fund be closed and that the remaining equity in the fund be transferred to 2016 GO Refunding Bond Fund. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, at a regular meeting held December 10, 2018. ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 10 Date: December 10, 2018 Item Description: Reduce Debt Levy Requirement Series 2014A Presenter: Ron Olson Agenda Consent Agenda Section: 1. Purpose. To reduce the statutory debt levy requirement for the Series 2014A GO Bonds. 2. Background. Minnesota Statute 475.61 requires the City to collect at least 105% of the annual amount needed for principal and interest payment obligations on the bonds. The 105% requirement can be met through taxes, special assessments, transfers from other funds, or cash on hand. A portion of the 2014A bond proceeds were used for the construction of the Police Garage/Addition. Part of the funding for debt service payments of the bonds is an annual transfer of a portion of the Mound Police Service contract revenue to the debt service fund. To date, a total of $990,000 has been transferred. This transfer allows the City to levy an annual amount that is less than the statutory requirement. The preliminary levy approved on September 24, 2018 was based on the reduced amount. In the past, Hennepin County accepted documentation showing the transfer had been completed as proof that the 105% requirement was met. Now the County requires a copy of a resolution reducing the levy requirement. Approval of the resolution does not decrease the actual levy amount. It is needed to demonstrate that the City is meeting the 105% requirement. 3. Staff Recommendation. Approval of the attached resolution reducing the debt levy requirements for the Series 2014A GO bonds. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt A Resolution to reduce the levy requirements for the Series 2014A General Obligation Bonds. Exhibits A. Resolution to Reduce the Levy Requirements for the Series 2014A General Obligation Bonds. B. Debt Levy Requirements Prepared By: J?Y(g Reviewed By: -Sb)a Approved By: -Sb) CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION TO REDUCE THE LEVY REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SERIES 2014A GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS WHEREAS, the City has issued Series 2014A General Obligation Bonds; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 475.61 requires the City to collect at least 105% of the annual amount need for principal and interest payment obligations on the bonds; and WHEREAS, the City has been annually transferring additional amounts from the General Fund to pay a portion of the debt service on the 2014A General Obligation Bonds; and WHEREAS, the annual transfer, tax levy, and cash on hand combine to exceed the 105% requirement; and WHEREAS, the Statute allows a municipality to levy less than 105% of the debt service when other irrevocably pledged sources are available to meet the requirement; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the required levy for the 2014A General Obligation Bonds be reduced to $165,300 for the collectable 2019 tax levy. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, at a regular meeting held December 10, 2018. ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Cleric Dennis Walsh, Mayor CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. Ron Olson From: Sebastian Vannavong <Sebastian.Vannavong@hennepin.us> Sent: Monday, October 1, 2018 10:44 AM To: Anna Carlson Cc: Ron Olson; Sebastian Vannavong Subject: RE: [External] RE: City of Orono Proposed 2019 Levy Sorry to bother you again, Your Debt Levy Requirements were Reduced by 271,380.00 and this is not stated anywhere in your Resolutions. We need to have a Signed Resolutions to why the Debts is reduced. Required Levying 62705 GO Bonds, Series 2010A 132,727.00 '132,727.00 132,725.00 62961 GO BONDS, Series 2014A 298,298.00 298,298.00 165,300.00 B3154 GO Street Reconstctn Refunding 2016A 551,355.00 551,355.00 412,975.00 982; 380.00 Debt 1 e-vy FReqLIIren tt nts Reduced ( 2.00) (132,998.00) (138,80.00) (2T1,3�i[i.00} i i -„j ( () k{a ..tJll:JOJe f-tOkw n') :.'i_i 1l {1. Total From: Sebastian Vannavong Sent: Monday, October 01, 2018 10:31 AM To: Anna Carlson <acarlson@ci.orono.mn.us> Cc: ROlson@ci.orono.mn.us; Sebastian Vannavong <Sebastian.Vannavong@hennepin.us> Subject: RE: [External] RE: City of Orono Proposed 2019 Levy Good morning Anna, I am still missing the Proposed 2019 Levy Foran... Could you fill this out for me? 1 AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 11 Date: December 10, 2018 Item Description: Reduce Debt Levy Requirement Series 2016A Presenter: Ron Olson Agenda Consent Agenda Section: 1. Purpose. To reduce the statutory debt levy requirement for the Series 2016A GO Bonds. 2. Background. Minnesota Statute 475.61 requires the City to collect at least 105% of the annual amount needed for principal and interest payment obligations on the bonds. The 105% requirement can be met through taxes, special assessments, transfers from other funds, or cash on hand. The 2016A General Obligation Bonds we used to refund the Series 2008A Street Reconstruction Bonds. A portion of the original 2008A bond proceeds were used to replace water and sewer mains as part of the Casco Point Road Project. To pay for the Utility upgrades, the water and sewer funds have been transferring an annual amount to the debt service fund. This transfer allows the City to levy an annual amount that is less than the statutory requirement. The preliminary levy approved on September 24, 2018 was based on the reduced amount. In the past, Hennepin County accepted documentation showing the transfer had been completed as proof that the 105% requirement was met. Now the County requires a copy of a resolution reducing the levy requirement. Approval of the resolution does not decrease the actual levy amount. It is needed to demonstrate that the City is meeting the 105% requirement. 3. Staff Recommendation. Approval of the attached resolution reducing the debt levy requirements for the Series 2016A GO bonds. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt A Resolution to reduce the levy requirements for the Series 2016A General Obligation Bonds. Exhibits A. Resolution to Reduce the Levy Requirements for the Series 2016A General Obligation Bonds. B. Debt Levy Requirements Prepared By: J?Y(g Reviewed By: -Sb)a Approved By: -Sb) CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. A RESOLUTION TO REDUCE THE LEVY REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SERIES 2016A GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS WHEREAS, the City has issued Series 2016A General Obligation Street Reconstruction refunding Bonds; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 475.61 requires the City to collect at least 105% of the annual amount need for principal and interest payment obligations on the bonds; and WHEREAS, the City has been annually transferring additional amounts from the Water and Sewer Utility Funds to pay a portion of the debt service on the 2016A General Obligation Bonds; and WHEREAS, the annual transfer, tax levy, and cash on hand combine to exceed the 105% requirement; and WHEREAS, the Statute allows a municipality to levy less than 105% of the debt service when other irrevocably pledged sources are available to meet the requirement; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the required levy for the 2016A General Obligation Bonds be reduced to $412,975 for the collectable 2019 tax levy. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, at a regular meeting held December 10, 2018. ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor Ron Olson From: Sebastian Vannavong <Sebastian.Vannavong@hennepin.us> Sent: Monday, October 1, 2018 10:44 AM To: Anna Carlson Cc: Ron Olson; Sebastian Vannavong Subject: RE: [External] RE: City of Orono Proposed 2019 Levy Sorry to bother you again, Your Debt Levy Requirements were Reduced by 271,380.00 and this is not stated anywhere in your Resolutions. We need to have a Signed Resolutions to why the Debts is reduced. Required Levying 62705 GO Bonds, Series 2010A 132,727.00 '132,727.00 132,725.00 62961 GO BONDS, Series 2014A 298,298.00 298,298.00 165,300.00 B3154 GO Street Reconstctn Refunding 2016A 551,355.00 551,355.00 412,975.00 982; 380.00 Debt 1 e-vy FReqLIIren tt nts Reduced ( 2.00) (132,998.00) (138,80.00) (2T1,3�i[i.00} i i -„j ( () k{a ..tJll:JOJe f-tOkw n') :.'i_i 1l {1. Total From: Sebastian Vannavong Sent: Monday, October 01, 2018 10:31 AM To: Anna Carlson <acarlson@ci.orono.mn.us> Cc: ROlson@ci.orono.mn.us; Sebastian Vannavong <Sebastian.Vannavong@hennepin.us> Subject: RE: [External] RE: City of Orono Proposed 2019 Levy Good morning Anna, I am still missing the Proposed 2019 Levy Foran... Could you fill this out for me? 1 AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 12 Date: December 10, 2018 Item Description: Authorization to Disburse Claims Presenter: Ron Olson Agenda Consent Agenda Finance Director Section: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to authorize the Treasurer to disburse city funds in payment of claims that would normally be approved at the 2" d meeting in December. 2. Background. Typically during the month of December the City has only one council meeting. The meeting which would fall on or near the Christmas holiday is cancelled. Staff is requesting authorization to process a normal claims processing for the canceled meeting. This practice is routinely done in December with the Council then formally approving the claims at the first meeting in January of the following year. Without this authorization, no claims would be processed from December 10th to January 14th, this would make it difficult to comply with State Stature 471.425 requiring prompt payment of claims. 3. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends authorizing the Treasurer to disburse city funds in payment of claims received for the December 24th council meeting prior to formal approval at the January 14, 2019 council meeting. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to authorize the City Treasurer to disburse city funds in payment of claims received for the December 24th council meeting which has been canceled, and that such paid claims be presented for formal approval at the January 14, 2019 council meeting. Prepared By: -%1W Reviewed By: 5b Approved By: 5b) AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 13 Item Description: 2019 Non -Union Compensation Date: December 10, 2018 Presenter: Ron Olson Agenda Consent Agenda Finance Director Section: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to adopt a resolution approving pay plan adjustments for non-union city employees for 2019. 2. Background. The City adopts an updated non-union pay scale annually. This action will set the 2019 wage and benefits for the following positions: Office Manager (PD), City Clerk, Building Official, Deputy Chief, Community Development Director, Public Works Director, Finance Director, Police Chief, and the City Administrator. a. Compensation. The 2019 budget has includes a 2.5% COLA increase to the City's pay scale. A copy of the updated pay scale is included with this memo. b. Insurance. For 2019 the City's insurance contribution for employees selecting family (employee plus) coverage is budgeted for $1,346.50 which is an increase of $16.50 over 2018. The contribution for employees selecting single coverage remains frozen at the 2011 amount of $915. The waiver amount decreases to $286.50. c. Mileage. The attached resolution also confirms that the City will continue to reimburse employees at the IRS allowed mileage rate in 2019. The 2018 IRS standard rate is currently set at 54.5 cents per mile. The 2019 rate has not yet been released. d. Safety Shoe Allowance. This reimbursement will remain at $200 annually. 3. Cost. The total cost of a 2.5% COLA is $24,735. This cost is shared between the General Fund ($22,247) and the Enterprise Funds ($2,488). The increased insurance contribution adds a total of $800. 4. Funding. The funding for these expenditures are included in the 2019 budget. 5. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of a resolution approving pay plan adjustments for non-union city employees for 2019. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt a resolution approving pay plan adjustments for non-union city employees for 2019. Exhibits A. Resolution B. Updated Non -Union Pay Scale Prepared By: qJV Reviewed By:.b)X1 Approved By: 5b) CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION APPROVING PAY PLAN ADJUSTMENTS FOR NON-UNION CITY EMPLOYEES FOR 2019 WHEREAS, the City Administrator is responsible for annually presenting pay adjustments for City employees, with the exception of employees covered by collective bargaining agreements; and WHEREAS, sufficient funds have been appropriated in the proposed 2019 Annual Budget to fund the recommended pay adjustments and such other matters of compensation as herein specified. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Orono City Council as follows: 1. That the City's non-union pay scale be increased by 2.5% to reflect a Cost of Living increase. 2. That the City's cafeteria benefit plan contribution will increase $16.50 to $1,346.50 per month for employees on family coverage, $915 for single (no cash) and $286.50 for waivers. 3. That City employees using their own vehicles for approved work related business shall be compensated at a rate allowed by the IRS (currently $0.535 per mile). 4. That the 2019 Safety Shoe Reimbursement will remain at $200 for employees that qualify for this reimbursement. Adopted by the Council this 10th day of December, 2018. ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor CITY OF ORONO NON-UNION EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION PLAN POSITION GRADES Grade Point Range Positions in Grade 1 0-76 2 77-89 3 90-103 4 104-113 5 114-127 6 128-143 7 144-164 8 165-186 9 187-233 Office Manager (E) 10 234-299 City Clerk (E) 11 300-345 12 346-398 Building Official (E) 13 399-458 14 459-517 15 518-647 Community Development Director (E), Deputy Chief (E) 16 648-843 Public Works Director/City Engineer (E); Finance Director (E) 17 844-970 18 971-1068 Police Chief (E) 19 1069-1176 City Administrator (E) (E) = Exempt Compensation Plan Non -Union Employees Pay Grades and Steps For 2019 BUDGET Grade Start Step 1 Step 2 S ep 3 S ep 4 S ep 5 S ep 6 S ep 7 Hourly Annual Hourly Annual Hourly Annual Hourly Annual Hourl Annual Hourly Annual Hourly Annual Hourly Annual 1 16.50 34,321.88 17.011 35,383.38 17.54 36,477.72 18.08 37,605.89 18.64 38,768.96 19.22 39,968.00 19.81 41,204.12 20.42 42,478.48 2 17.55 36,512.64 18.10 37,641.89 18.66 38,806.08 19.23 40,006.27 19.83 41,243.58 20.44 42,519.15 21.07 43,834.17 21.73 45,189.87 3 18.67 38,843.23 19.25 40,044.57 19.85 41,283.07 20.46 42,559.86 21.09 43,876.15 21.75 45,233.14 22.42 46,632.10 23.11 48,074.33 4 19.87 41,322.59 20.48 42,600.60 21.11 43,918.15 21.77 45,276.45 22.44 46,676.75 23.13 48,120.36 23.85 49,608.62 24.59 51,142.90 5 21.13 43,960.20 21.79 45,319.79 22.46 46,721.44 23.16 48,166.43 23.87 49,656.12 24.61 51,191.87 25.37 52,775.13 26.16 54,407.35 6 22.48 46,766.17 23.18 48,212.55 23.90 49,703.66 24.64 51,240.89 25.40 52,825.66 26.18 54,459.44 26.99 56,143.75 27.83 57,880.16 7 23.92 49,751.24 24.66 51,289.94 25.42 52,876.23 26.21 54,511.58 27.02 56,197.50 27.85 57,935.57 28.72 59,727.39 29.60 61,574.63 8 25.45 52,926.86 26.23 54,563.77 27.04 56,251.32 27.88 57,991.05 28.74 59,784.59 29.63 61,633.59 30.55 63,539.79 31.49 65,504.94 9 27.07 56,305.17 27.91 58,046.57 28.77 59,841.83 29.66 61,692.61 30.58 63,600.63 31.52 65,567.65 32.50 67,595.52 33.50 69,686.10 10 28.80 59,899.12 29.69 61,751.66 30.61 63,661.52 31.55 65,630.43 32.53 67,660.24 33.54 69,752.82 34.57 71,910.12 35.64 74,134.15 11 30.64 63,722.46 31.58 65,693.26 32.56 67,725.02 33.57 69,819.60 34.61 71,978.97 35.68 74,205.12 36.78 76,500.13 37.92 78,866.11 12 32.59 67,789.85 33.60 69,886.44 34.64 72,047.89 35.71 74,276.17 36.81 76,573.38 37.95 78,941.62 39.13 81,383.11 40.34 83,900.12 13 34.67 72,116.86 35.74 74,347.28 36.85 76,646.69 37.99 79,017.21 39.16 81,461.04 40.38 83,980.45 41.62 86,577.78 42.91 89,255.44 14 36.88 76,720.07 38.03 79,092.85 39.20 81,539.03 40.41 84,060.86 41.66 86,660.68 42.95 89,340.90 44.28 92,104.02 45.65 94,952.60 15 39.24 81,617.10 40.45 84,141.34 41.70 86,743.65 42.99 89,426.45 44.32 92,192.21 45.69 95,043.52 47.11 97,983.01 48.56 101,013.41 16 41.74 86,826.69 43.03 89,512.05 44.37 92,280.48 45.74 95,134.51 47.15 98,076.82 48.61 101,110.12 50.11 104,237.23 51.66 107,461.07 17 44.41 92,368.82 45.78 95,225.59 47.20 98,170.72 48.66 101,206.93 50.16 104,337.04 51.71 107,563.96 53.31 110,890.68 54.96 114,320.28 18 47.24 98,264.71 48.70 101,303.83 50.21 104,436.94 51.76 107,666.95 53.36 110,996.86 55.01 114,429.75 56.72 117,968.81 58.47 121,617.33 19 50.26 104,536.92 51.81 107,770.02 53.41 111,103.13 55.07 114,539.31 56.77 118,081.76 58.53 121,733.77 60.34 125,498.73 62.20 129,380.13 rolson\spreadsheets\asst\wages\Paysteps Non -Union AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 14 Date: December 10, 2018 Item Description: Approve Non -Employee Reimbursement Presenter: Ron Olson Agenda Consent Agenda Finance Director Section: 1. Purpose. To approve the reimbursement of expenditures of made by a member of the Park Commission related to the tree lighting event at the Orono Public Course. 2. Background. At the November 13, 2018 Council Meeting, the Council approved a first annual holiday tree lighting ceremony at the golf course. As part of the event's preparation, Park Commission Chair Rick Meyers purchased supplies to be used at the event. The Orono city code allows for commission member to be reimbursed for expenditures with the approval of the Council. 3. Cost. The amount of the reimbursement is $190.61. 4. Funding. As part of the event approval the Council approved expenditures of up to $5,175. 5. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of the reimbursement to Rick Meyer for the purchase of items used at the annual holiday tree lighting ceremony. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the reimbursement of expenditures made by Rick Meyer on behalf of the City for use at the holiday tree lighting ceremony. Exhibits A. Reimbursement Request B. Orono Code Sec. 2-206 Prepared By: Jijv` Reviewed By: 5b Approved By: 5b)b Ron Olson From: rick meyers <valkriders2@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, December 3, 2018 2:11 PM To: Ron Olson Subject: Tree lighting event Hey Ron, please reimburse me for the amount of $190.61 for expenses incurred for decorating the Club House for the Tree lighting event. Thanks, Rick Meyers Orono Park Chair Sent from my iPhone &Ddo- 416)1-z13kg0 -Eo0 to pay: 0 Date: ' z t`I l ► � m"Ods Where Creativity Happens MICHAELS STORE #9700 (952)591-8109 11522 WAYZATA BLVD. MINNETONKA, MN 55305 8-%jj -2455--5945-7631 -OV"l 11 -1103-5019 Vllllil'AIiIIVNIMIb91VIIlI�I!Ill�illl'n'lll�ll 2489701 SALE 2901 9700 002 11/08/18 13:16 ASH GRLND PINE W/ 191518684513 30,00 1 @ 12.00 P ,00 - 1 DISCAl1 - 3.00 - ASH GRLND PIIS W/ 191518684513 30.00 1 ASH @ 12.00 P 1 DISCDII - 3.00 - ASH GARLAND 6FT P 191518699562 30.00 1 @ 12.00 P 1 DISCOUNT_ 3,00 - ASH WREATH 29IN R 191518686036 40.00 1 @ 19.20 P 1 DISGOINT_ 4.80 - ASH TT MENSWEAR B 191518679441 12.00 1 @ 4.80 P 1 DISCaNT_ 1.20 - ASH TT MENSWEAR B 191518679441 12.00 1 @ 4.80 P 1 DISOUXT_ 1,20 - ASH TT MENSWEAR B 191518679441 12.00 1 @ 4,80 P 1 DISCOUNT_ 1,20 - ASH 16" NUTCRACKE 191518731149 20.00 1 @ 8.00 P 1 DISCOUNT_ 2,00-- ,00-ASH ASH16" NUTCRACKE 191518731651 20.00 1 @ 8.00 P 1 DISCOUNT_ 2.00- ASH23"STKTICKING 191518704228 20.00 1 @ 8.00 P 1 DISCOUNT_ 2.OD- ASH2O"STKG PLAID 191518704204 18.00 1 @ 7.20 P 1 DISCOUNT_ 1,80 - ASH 20"STKG PLD R 191518704211 18,00 1 @ 7.20 P 1 DISCOUNT_ 1.80 - ASH ORN OUT 200MM 191518714296 10,00 1 @ 9.00 P 1 DISCOUNT_ 1,00 - ASH ORN OUT 200MM 191518714296 10.00 1 @ 4.00 P 1 OISCOWT_ 1,00 - ASH ORN OUT MTL 2 191518769135 10.00 1 @ 4.00 P 1 DISCOWT_ 1.00 - ASH SCTD PINECONE 191518680232 6.00 1 @ 2.40 P 1 DISCOUNT_ .60 - ASH SCTD PINECONE 191518680232 6.00 1 @ 2.40 P 1 DISCOUNT_ . 60- GHIRADELLI DC CAR 747599708503 .59 1 @ .47 N 1 DISCOUNT_ ,12 - AMOUNT Wl1Al.IFIED FOR DISCOUNT $ 304.59 YOU SRVED $ 179.32 SUBTOTAL 125.27 Sales Tax 7.525% 9.43 TDTAL 134.70 Hope Chest Breast Cancer www.hopechest.com Bloomington 952-217-4655 Eden Prairie 952-47'1-8751 Orono 952-471-8700 Date. 11/11/2018 1 29 21 Plvl Sale # 171664 Employee: sschuehle Receipt #: 171664 Customer. Rick Meyers (19356) 40000-456 `533.00' Ci -air Upholstered 15272-45 $19.00" Holiday Holiday Santa Sub Total STATE SAES TAX Total VISA . 311192 3738 - XX/XX TOTAL NUMBER OF ITEMS 2 $5200 $3.91 $55.9'1 $55 91 Thank you for your purchase! All sales are "as is There are NO returns Pick up items within 5 days or $10/day charge will be assessed. PLEASE BRING HELP TO LOAD YOUR ITEMS'!! Delivery is available. The Hope Chest Retail Stores are registered with the State of MN as professional fundraisers! Cardholder Copy 12/4/2018 Orono, MN Code of Ordinances Sec. 2-206. - Appointments; removal. All board and commission appointments authorized by ordinance shall be made by the council at the first regular meeting in January of each year unless another appointment date is established elsewhere by ordinance. The term of each appointee shall be established and stated at the time of his appointment, and terms of present board and commission members may be reestablished and changed so as to give effect to this section. New appointees shall assume office immediately. All appointees to boards and commissions shall hold office until their successor is appointed and qualified. All vacancies shall be filled in the same manner as for an expired term, but the appointment shall be only for the unexpired term. No appointed board or commission member shall be an employee of the city, but an ex officio member may be so employed. All appointed board and commission members shall serve without remuneration but may be reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses incurred in the performance of their duties when such expenses have been authorized by the council before they were incurred. In order to balance the need for consistency, with the desire to provide ongoing opportunities for new members, the council, in general, will reappoint commission members for up to two additional three-year terms beyond their initial three-year term. Any board or commission member may be removed by the council for any reason and his position filled as any other vacancy. Each board and commission shall hold its regular meetings at a time established and approved by the council. Boards and commissions created by resolution shall terminate when the purpose for which they were created has been accomplished or upon the expiration of their terms stated in the resolution. Except as otherwise provided, this section shall apply to all boards and commissions. (Code 1984, § 2.50; Ord. No. 115 2nd series, 5-24-1993) HE AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 15 Date: December 10, 2018 Item Description: Resolution Designating Polling Locations Presenter: Anna Carlson, Agenda Consent Agenda City Clerk Section: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to gain approval for a resolution to designate polling place locations for the 2019 Elections. 2. Background. Cities are now required to designate polling places by December 31 of each year, even if nothing has changed. Also, this is the case in spite of 204B.11, Subd. 3. Essentially, polling place designations are effective until changed, but they also must be designated by December 31 of every year. 3. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval of the Resolution presented. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the Resolution Designating Polling Locations for the 2019 Elections. Exhibit A. Resolution Prepared By: AMC Reviewed By: AMC Approved By: -'bg CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING POLLING LOCATIONS FOR THE 2019 ELECTIONS WHEREAS, the City of Orono is required to designate polling locations for the 2019 elections prior to January 1, 2019. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of, Minnesota hereby designates the following polling locations for the 2019 Elections: Precinct 1 Long Lake Fire Station 340 Willow Drive North Orono, MN 55356 Precinct 2 Good Shepherd Lutheran Church 3745 Shoreline Drive Wayzata, MN 55391 Precinct 3A Calvary Memorial Church 2420 Dunwoody Avenue Wayzata, MN 55391 Precinct 4A Orono Council Chambers 2780 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the city clerk is hereby authorized to designate a replacement location meeting the requirements of the Minnesota Election Law for any polling place designated in this Resolution that becomes unavailable for use by the City; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the city clerk is hereby authorized to designate an emergency replacement polling place meeting the requirements of the Minnesota Election Law for any polling place designated in this Resolution when necessary to ensure a safe and secure location for voting; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the city clerk is directed to send a copy of this resolution and any subsequent polling place designations to the Hennepin County Elections Office. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono this 10th day of December, 2018. Dennis Walsh, Mayor ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 16 Date: December 10, 2018 Item Description: Liquor Violation — Navarre Liquors Presenter: Soren Mattick, Agenda Consent Agenda City Attorney Section: Purpose. The purpose of this item is to present a liquor violation to the City Council. Background. The Orono Police Department conducts periodic compliance checks with all establishments licensed to sell tobacco and liquor within the City of Orono. When an establishment sells tobacco or liquor to a person that is not eligible to purchase these items, the City Code imposes a presumptive penalty on the licensee. On September 5, 2018 an employee of Navarre Liquors sold intoxicating liquor to an underage person in violation of State law and Orono City Code Section 34-5 (a)(1)(a). The Stipulation of Facts and Civil Sanction is attached to this Council Action item as Exhibit A. The City will impose a civil sanction in the amount of $500. Per City Code Section 34-41 the presumptive penalty for the 1St violation is $500. The Fee was paid by Navarre Liquors on November 30, 2018. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends the City Council Approve the Stipulation of Facts and Civil Sanction Agreement. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Consider a motion to approve the Stipulation of Facts and Civil Sanction Agreement. Exhibits A. Stipulation of Facts and Civil Sanction Prepared By: AMC Reviewed By: AMC Approved By: -Sb)a CITY OF ORONO HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA In Re: City of Orono Liquor STIPULATION OF FACTS Licensing Complaint Against AND CIVIL SANCTION Navarre Liquors The City of Orono and its undersigned attorney, and Navarre Liquors through its undersigned authorized officer, hereby agree and stipulate as follows: Navarre Liquors is licensed under Orono City Code Section 34-66, to operate an off -sale intoxicating liquor establishment at 3421 Shoreline Drive, Orono, Minnesota. 2. On September 5, 2018, Steven James Zerby, an employee, did sell intoxicating liquor to an underage person in violation of State law and Orono City Code Section 34- 5(b)(1)(a). This constitutes Navarre Liquors' first liquor license violation in the past 3 years pursuant to Orono City Code Section 34-41. 4. Copies of the Orono Police Department reports regarding this incident are incorporated into this Stipulation by reference. 5. Navarre Liquors shall pay a civil sanction in the amount of $500.00 by November 1, 2018. 6. Navarre Liquors waives its right to the hearing provided by Minnesota Statute § 340A.415 and Orono City Code Section 34-41. 7. The civil sanction set forth in Section 5 is contingent upon the Orono City Council's approval. If the City Council rejects the sanction agreed to in this Stipulation in favor of more severe sanctions, Navarre Liquors has the absolute right to withdraw its waiver of hearing and to have a hearing before the City Council. Dated: ) I I (4 1 ( � CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association By: -----� Soren M. Mattick Attorney for the City of Orono Grand Oak Office Center I 860 Blue Gentian Road, Suite 290 Eagan, MN 55121 Telephone: (651) 452-5000 Dated: NAVARRE LIQUORS LOW Its 3421 Shoreline Drive Orono, MN 55391 AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 17 Date: December 10, 2018 Item Description: Ordinance Text Amendment to Mayor's Term Presenter: Dustin Rief, Agenda Consent Agenda City Administrator Section: 1. Purpose: To change the term of the Mayor's position from two years to 4 years 2. Background: The mayor's term has been 2 years since the city was incorporated. For continuity of leadership and staff relations it would be beneficial to the city that the mayor's position be elected to a 4 year term, aligning with other council members. This change would be in effect for the next election beginning January 1, 2021. 3. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends adoption of the ordinance to change the mayor's term from 2 years to 4 years. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt the ordinance to change the mayor's term from 2 years to 4 years. Exhibits A. Ordinance Amendment to Mayor's Term Prepared By: 5b)R Reviewed By: -Sb)R Approved By: -T)2 CITY OF ORONO HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 2-36 OF THE ORONO CITY CODE CONCERING THE MAYOR'S TERM OF OFFICE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ORONO ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Section 2-36 of the Orono City Code is amended by deleting the strikethrough language and adding the underlined language as follows: Sec. 2-36. - Terms of office. The mayor shall be elected for a twe four-year term at eaeh biennial eity eleetiefl... Two members of the city council other than the mayor shall be elected for four-year terms at each biennial city election. The mayor and councilmembers shall take office on January 1 next following the election. SECTION 2. This ordinance shall be effective January 31, 2019. ADOPTED this 10th day of December, 2018, by the City Council of the City of Orono. CITY OF ORONO :• ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 18 Item Description: 2019 Public Works Plan Date: December 11, 2018 Presenter: Adam T. Edwards Agenda Consent Agenda Public Works Director/City Engineer Section: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this item is to gain Council approval for the 2019 Public Works Plan. 2. Background. The 2019 Public Works Plan is an effort to improve the planning and budgeting of Public Works and Engineering activities for the City of Orono. The intent of the plan is to: a. Provide an increased level of detail and refinement on those items from the Capital Improvement plan (CIP) that are scheduled for the upcoming calendar and fiscal year. b. Improve the coordination/timing of projects. c. Provide City Council a comprehensive list of work for approval early in the year in conjunction with the CIP and Budget approvals. d. Ensure that the Public Works and Engineering Department's priorities and work items are meeting Council intent and direction. e. Identify items for planning and engineering the year prior to their execution. 3. 2019 Public Works Plan. The 2019 Public Works plan is attached as Exhibit A. Upon approval, the public works and engineering staff will begin executing the plan. Many of the projects will require further Council action for design approvals and/or award of contracts. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approval the attached 2019 Public Works Plan. Exhibits A. 2019 Public Works Plan Prepared By: Reviewed By: -Sb)R Approved By: -TV 2019 Public Works Plan The 2019 Public Work Plan describes the planned activities of the Public Works and Engineering Department broken down by functional area. The list includes capital investment items and the larger maintenance and operations projects. Once approved by the City Council it will be the guiding work document for the Department's activities in 2019. Table of Contents Public Works Overview 2 Public Works 2019 Plan by Function 3 Streets 3 Sewer 4 Water 5 Storm Water 5 Parks 6 Equipment & Facilities 6 Maintenance District Map 7 Project Map 8 References: City Council 2016 Goals Park Commission 2018 Goals/Priorities 2008-2030 Community Management Plan 2018-2040 Community Management Plan (DRAFT) 2019 Draft Capital Investment Plan, 2019 Draft Budget Water System Plan, 2013 Well Head Protection Plan, 2013 Pavement Management Plan, 2014 Sign Retro -reflectivity Policy, 2015 Traffic Management Policy, 2015 Orono Standard Plates, 2018 Orono Snow and Ice Policy, 2018 Surface Water management Plan, 2018 (DRAFT) Orono MS4 Program/Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan, 2015 1 Public Works and Engineering Department Overview Vision: Making people's lives better through the services we provide each day. Mission: Orono Public Works enhances the safety, welfare and livability of the community by providing and managing infrastructure and services for Water, Sewer, Facilities, Streets and Parks. Goals: • Proactively maintain the City's infrastructure thru established and aggressive preventative maintenance programs • Develop, support and retain a qualified, motivated and well-trained work force • Provide a responsive, respectful, customer service oriented focus in all we do • Ensure construction and maintenance activities are conducted to standard in a fiscally and environmentally responsible way • Identify and champion sustainable funding for Public Works services Organization: Public Works Director: Adam Edwards, P.E. Streets and Storm Sewer Utilities and Facilities Parks & Golf Course Engineering Supervisor: David (DJ) Supervisor: Scott Supervisor: Jason Goehring City Engineer: Adam Edwards, P.E. Goman Oberaigner • Equipment Maintenance • Sanitary sewer system • Parks • Design, management and • Municipal Street Signage o Lift stations • Playgrounds construction of the cities infrastructure • Residential Street Lights • Water production & • Beaches • Implements the SWPPP, NPDES, • Snow Plowing distribution • City docks Well Head Protection, and Pavement • Street Repairs o Fire hydrants • City grounds Management plans. • Roadside Tree Trimming o Meter reading • Ice rinks • Reviews Construction and Zoning • Sidewalks o Water meters • Trails permit applications (Grading and • Drainage t o Water Quality Report Manage and maintain a 9 hole Erosion ) • Storm Water System • Underground utility municipal Golf Course • Support PB&Z property complaints. • Street Sweeping locates • City buildings 6 Maintenance Workers Clubhouse Manger (Seasonal) Engineering Consulting Firm: 3 Maintenance Worker (Seasonal) Park Maintenance Workers Bolton and Menk, Inc (Seasonal) Dave Martini, P.E. Clubhouse Attendants (Seasonal) Streets Project Department Description Description/ Scope Operating CIP Amount Funding source Number Engineering Budget Management Fund 19-001 Streets 2019 Streets Forest Arm Lane—Reconstruction with drainage improvements $ 1,501,933 Pavement Fund East Long Lake Road — Reclamation and drainage improvements Stormwater Fund Tonkaview Lane - Reclamation with drainage improvements Sanitary Fund Chevy Chase Drive- Mill and overlay, reclamation and reconstruction with drainage improvements Water Fund 19-002 Streets Ferndale Road N Mill and Overlay Mill and overlay pavement and repair storm sewer. Shared MSA road with Plymouth. $ 125,000 Financing from Plymouth Stormwater Fund 19-003 Streets 2019 Preventive Street Maintenance Select streets shall have their cracks routed, cleaned and sealed. Spot sealing will be required on areas $ 50,000 Pavement Fund with a concentration of small cracks. 19-004 Streets Annual Sign Inspection and This activity includes the inspection all of the street signs in maintenance area 1. Damaged and failing $ 17,400 Streets Operating Maintenance -2019 -Dist 1 signs will be replaced in accordance the Traffic management policy and the Sigh Retro -reflectivity Policy. Budget 19-005 Streets Right of Way Tree Trimming -2019 Tree trimming and stump removals within the rights of way $ 17,000 Streets Operating Budget 19-006 Streets 2019-2020 Snow and Ice removal / Annual Snow and Ice Removal. Performed in accordance with the Snow and Ice Policy $ 120,000 Streets Operating treat Budget 19-007 Streets Spring Street Sweeping Spring Street Sweeping $ 13,000 Streets Operating Budget 19-008 Streets Fall Street Sweeping Fall Street Sweeping $ 13,000 Streets Operating Budget 19-009 Streets 2019 Road Patching Reactive Street maintenance including in house and contracted patching. $ 15,000 $ 50,000 Pavement Fund 19-010 Streets 2019 ROW Mowing Mowing of select potions of the ROW. $ 10,000 Streets Operating Budget 19-011 Streets Light Pole Decorations -2019 Light pole decorations for 2019-HolidayLights, Banners and Flags $ 2,000 Streets Operating Budget 20-001 Streets 2020 Street Project Design and Prepare engineering plans for 2020 Streets projects $ 135,000 Pavement Engineering Management Fund Sanitary Sewer Project Department Description Description/ Scope Operating CIP Amount Funding source Number Budget 19-012 Sanitary 2019 -Monitoring and Alarm Upgrade- This project will see the provision of electronic monitoring of 4 additional Lift Stations. This project will $ 26,000 Sanitary Sewer Fund Sewer Sewer upgrade/replace components of the monitoring system including antennas, cabling, and uninterruptable power supply. This is a continuation/ expansion of the project begun in 2016. As of 2018the city has 34/46 lift stations being electronically monitored. The electronic monitoring system being used has exceeded its useful life. The remaining lift stations are dependent upon audible and visual alarms to provide notification of mechanical issues. The provision of electronic monitoring for all of the city's lift stations will improve response time to issues, reduce backup incidents and provide real time monitoring and reporting for accountability. 19-013 Sanitary Sanitary sewer Rehabilitation (CIPP) This Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation project will consist of Cured in Place Pipe (CIPP) lining approximately $ 281,377 Sanitary Sewer Fund Sewer 2019 4,500 feet of infiltration susceptible sanitary sewer pipes, manhole reconstruction, and lid replacement. The purpose of the project is to reduce Inflow and Infiltration (I&I) into the Sanitary sewer systems and extend the life to the existing pipes. The lining process creates and new durable pipe within the older pipe at a much reduced cost from open curing or directionally drilling in order to replace the older pipe. 18-014 Sanitary 2019 -Lift Stations Rehabilitations This project will rehabilitate 3 of the City's 45 Lift Stations. Rehabilitation includes the inspection, and $ 100,000 Sanitary Sewer Fund Sewer replacement of a lift stations piping, motors, pumps and control as well as repairs wet well. The Lift Stations identified for 2019 are Grinder Station #9, Grinder Station #10 and Lift Station #1. Rehabilitating 2 19-015 Sanitary 2019 Sewer Main Flushing This project includes the cleaning of 1/5 of the City's sewer mains. This project is part of the City $ 14,000 Sanitary Operating Sewer preventative maintenance program. 2019's focus will be in maintenance area 1. Budget 19-016 Sanitary 2019 Sewer Main Televising and This project includes the cleaning and inspection of 1/5 of the City's sewer mains. This project is part of $ 47,272 Sanitary Sewer Fund Sewer Inspection the City preventative maintenance program. The results of the inspection are used to determine future maintenance needs. 2019's focus will be in maintenance area 1. 19-017 Sanitary 2019 Lift Station Inspections Annual Inspection of all Lift Stations. Preventive maintenance inspections to determine maintenance $ 8,000 Sanitary Operating Sewer needs. Budget 19-018 Sanitary 2019 Back Up Generator Installations This project will provide a backup generator for Grinder Station #9 (Vine Street) which services the $ 150,000 Sanitary Sewer Fund Sewer sanitary sewer system west and south of Forest Lake and for Lift Station #1 (Northshore). which services the sanitary sewer in the south east corner of the City. 19-020 Sanitary Inflow & Infiltration Policy Review Staff will explore and develop options for combating Inflow and Infiltration to include point of sale Staff Time Sewer inspections, new construction inspections and additional municipal activities. the purpose is to prevent sewage overflows into homes and waterways and reduce sewage disposal costs. Water Project Department Description Description/ Scope Operating CIP Amount Funding source Number Budget 19-021 Water Water main & force main This project includes the replacement the water main and force main that run under the County's CSAH 15- $ 349,855 Sanitary Sewer Fund 19-028 Storm Water replacement under CSAH 15 at 19 19 Intersection project area. These pipes were installed in the 1960's. Over the years the city has had $ 88,500 Water Fund south) issues with cast iron pipe deterioration based. The most cost effective time to replace the pipe is when 19-029 Storm Water Storm Water Improvements -2019 the road is under construction. $ 200,000 Stormwater Fund 19-022 Water 2019 Hydrant Flushing This project includes the annual flushing of the city water mains, testing and inspection of hydrants. $ 8,000 Water Operating 19-030 Storm Water Annual Storm Water Inspections and Each year the City inspects and cleans 1/5 of the storm sewer system. The focus area for 2019 is District 1. $ 8,000 Budget 19-023 Water Water Plant Painting Paint interior of the north and south water plants. $ 99,000 Water Fund 19-024 Water Well #3 Screen installation This project includes the installation of a sand screen for Well #3's. To ensure a continued, dependable $ 92,000 Water Fund supply of quality water from the City's well periodic maintenance is required. Addition of a screen will allow the well to operate at its full capacity. It is currently limited due to the sand formation the well sits in. at high volume the well pulls in sand. 19-025 Water Water Valve Exercising and Exercise and inspect all of the water valves in maintenance district 1. Replace any defective valves $ 24,000 Water Fund inspection and replacement. 19-026 Water Water meter Replacement This project begins the process of changing out the city's water meters. The total project is planned over a $ 90,000 Water Fund 5 year period. The project also includes meter reading hardware and software upgrades. Stormwater Project Department Description Description/ Scope Operating CIP Amount Funding source Number Budget 19-027 Storm Water Pond and Drainage Area Study 5 year plan to assess all of the city's storm ponds and drainage areas. This is year4 of 5. $ 10,000 Stormwater Fund 19-028 Storm Water OCB Pipe Upsizing (Countryside Upsize storm pipe or convert to open channel the pipe that runs parallel to OCBfrom Watertown Road $ 88,500 Stormwater Fund south) South. 19-029 Storm Water Storm Water Improvements -2019 This project includes miscellaneous storm water repairs and improvements include culvert replacements, $ 200,000 Stormwater Fund curb and gutter Improvements and drainage way improvements; small but critical storm water issues. 19-030 Storm Water Annual Storm Water Inspections and Each year the City inspects and cleans 1/5 of the storm sewer system. The focus area for 2019 is District 1. $ 8,000 Stormwater Maintenance- Dist1 The inspections then drive future repair activities for the city. Operating Budget Parks Project Department Description Description/ Scope Operating CIP Amount Funding source Number Budget 19-031 Parks Dakota Trail connection. This project includes a trail connection along CSAH 19 from Livingston to the Dakota Trail. The project is a $ 115,000 Park Fund three way partnership between the City, Hennepin County and Three Rivers Park District. Three Rivers ment Outlay Fund 19-038 Facilities Post office Roof has the design and project lead. $ 20,000 Improvement/Equip 19-032 Parks Bederwood Park Improvements This project includes the installation of sports field, parking lot paving, connection trial and assorted park $ 170,000 Park Fund 19-039 Facilities Emergency Generator for PD and amenities. The project is dependent upon receiving a grant to cover 1/2 of the costs. $ 175,000 Grant 19-033 Parks Big Island ADA Trails This project includes converting select trails at Big Island to be ADA compliant. This project is dependent $ 54,000 Park Fund 19-040 Facilities Public Works Storage Rack upon receiving a grant for cover 1/2 of the cost. $ 20,000 Grant 19-034 Parks Golf course drainage improvements This project includes the replacement of drain tiles with and open channel to restore drainage to the area $ 21,400 Stormwater Fund to Fairway 7&8 around Fairways 7 and 8. 19-035 Parks Golf course Cart Trial rehabilitation This project will restore several sections of cart path that have deteriorated. $ 20,000 Golf Course Operating Budget 19-036 Parks 2019 Park Inspections Inspect all parks and lake access points. This annual inspection process ensures playground and park $ 5,000 Park Operating safety. Inspection results are used to plan future maintenance activity. Budget Equipment and Facilities Project Department Description Description/ Scope Operating CIP Amount Funding source Number Budget 19-037 Equipment 2019 Equipment replacements Procurement of a new greens mower (606) with a riding greens mower and replacement of the sign truck $ 168,000 Improvement/Equip (708) with a bucket truck. ment Outlay Fund 19-038 Facilities Post office Roof Replacement of the Post Office Roof. The roof has been leaking. Inspection has revealed the flat roof is $ 20,000 Improvement/Equip now concave and needs to be replaced. ment Outlay Fund 19-039 Facilities Emergency Generator for PD and Replacement of the emergency backup generator. The existing generator is undersize. The new $ 175,000 Improvement/Equip City Hall generator will be sized to support the City EOC, Police Department, City Hall and Public Works Facility. ment Outlay Fund 19-040 Facilities Public Works Storage Rack Procurement and installation of a storage rack system to organize and properly store public works $ 20,000 Improvement/Equip supplies and vehicle attachments. ment Outlay Fund Maintenance Districts 2019 = District 1 Sanitary Setiver Flushing and Telells nz ■ Storm Water Inspections Street Sign Inspections and Maintenance 7 2019 Public Emergency water Plant Afell �3 Screen Generator for Cit- Paia1IIL_e i�dallati�n Works Projects Hall and PD J eradale Road N Ply -mouth East Lang Labe CS4V Ueas:n^ — Road Rehabdititon Dramage -- - �"i, . Ih4FDIU7em-ds '1. LGNQ y �Che�}' Chase DL G"$. l r ' {� Li�Ff4� R�eha�llltl@n q°7--,. � I- 6. Beder .d Park— Imgnr-eme l f _ a GC Fainuay .� Drainage & Y r" C ath WAYiATl1 ! sy Lift Statins Rehab —ti Uy LS I Baelrup Generator 1 LS I n vy rr e«M Li$ Station Rehab { ix" W, FNues-t Sums .. .�— '?� it�r�aV �r�.m GS 4 Lane Recomiruct + o r ,W. a a. w: utilities Backup G�eratar Rehabs Y •may . Tonlcaview F6�o1l11i ! ��.s PDAofficeRoof h�f.l i Y+afiE'lmfIlt RP�ahlhtati®H r WTF[ eaMc �l II ,:al.+H•�:-�nla Y Li$StrtioaRelra6 Psr� y5 v. MIHHEriNN NA "w GS 10 BEACH %,.t. Plant PaintingWaterNfain 7a7 y x-,rmr R,eplacEment nx' i NIS �f Big Ist nd ADA Trails HC Project �2 mai.l t � a�an � I iLAh'U ta^ �g it Repla,emn-E TONXA 7 withHCProjed Sprny-arY- BiJ 6flY AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 19 Item Description: Employee Policy Amendment Date: December 10, 2018 Presenter: Dustin Rief Agenda Consent Agenda Section: 1. Purpose: To revise the terms of eligibility for sick leave donation 2. Background: The city has a sick leave donation policy for fellow employees that currently limits donations to life threatening illness. This policy places the city administrator in precarious positions when determining what is considered life threatening or not. The revised policy is based on the amount of time missed from work with a broader variety of ailments including that of close relatives as defined by the acceptable uses for sick leave. The policy has only been used 4 times in the past 20 years, all for valid reasons. The broadening of this policy has no negative impact on current employees. 3. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends adopting the personnel policy amendment COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to adopt the personnel policy amendment to Employee donation of sick leave policy. Exhibits A. Employee Handbook Amendment 12-10-18 Prepared By: 5b)R Reviewed By: -Sb)R Approved By: -T)2 CITY OF ORONO ORONO, MINNESOTA Final Version 2/9/09 Amended 02/24/14 Amended 12/10/18 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................... I Welcometo the City........................................................................................................................1 Conductas a City Employee............................................................................................................1 EmployerAuthority.........................................................................................................................2 Employmentat Will.........................................................................................................................2 EEOPolicy Statement......................................................................................................................3 EMPLOYMENT............................................................................................................................4 RecruitingSystem...........................................................................................................................4 ProbationaryPeriod.........................................................................................................................4 Physical and Psychological Examinations.......................................................................................5 Employmentof Relatives.................................................................................................................5 Promotions/Transfers/Demotions....................................................................................................6 Appointments and Veterans' Preference.........................................................................................7 OutsideEmployment.......................................................................................................................7 Definitions........................................................................................................................................7 Temporary and Regular Part -Time Employment............................................................................8 ServiceTime....................................................................................................................................8 Resignation......................................................................................................................................8 RULES AND PERSONAL CONDUCT....................................................................................10 RespectfulWorkplace Policy.........................................................................................................10 DisciplinaryAction........................................................................................................................14 Drugand Alcohol Testing..............................................................................................................15 EmployeeAssistance Program......................................................................................................19 Performance Evaluation.................................................................................................................19 SafetyProgram...............................................................................................................................20 ReportInjuries...............................................................................................................................21 PoliticalActivity............................................................................................................................21 Lost and Abandoned Property.......................................................................................................21 Travel.............................................................................................................................................22 Useof Vehicles..............................................................................................................................23 Gifts................................................................................................................................................24 WORK SCHEDULING/TIME RECORDS..............................................................................25 Hoursof Work...............................................................................................................................25 142286v11 1 Page Work Time Requirement and Reporting........................................................................................25 PayPeriod......................................................................................................................................26 OvertimePayment.........................................................................................................................26 Lunch Breaks and Rest Breaks......................................................................................................27 Closing Due to Adverse Weather Conditions................................................................................27 Wageand Salary Schedules...........................................................................................................27 EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS.....................................................................................................28 EmploymentBenefits.....................................................................................................................28 EmployeeInsurance.......................................................................................................................28 Changesin Coverage.....................................................................................................................28 Worker's Compensation................................................................................................................29 Steel Toe Boots Reimbursement....................................................................................................29 EmployeeRecognition...................................................................................................................29 TIME OFF BENEFITS...............................................................................................................31 Requestfor Leave..........................................................................................................................31 Holidays.........................................................................................................................................31 VacationLeave..............................................................................................................................32 SickLeave With Pay......................................................................................................................33 Familyand Medical Leave.............................................................................................................34 ParentingLeave.............................................................................................................................37 DonatedSick Leave.......................................................................................................................37 FuneralLeave.................................................................................................................................38 JuryDuty........................................................................................................................................3 8 MilitaryLeave................................................................................................................................39 School Conference and Activities Leave.......................................................................................40 VotingLeave..................................................................................................................................41 Bone Marrow Donation Leave.......................................................................................................41 OrganDonation Leave...................................................................................................................41 RETIREMENT PROGRAMS....................................................................................................42 Severance Pay at Retirement / Termination of Employment in Good Standing / Sick Pay Handling at Termination.............................................................42 Public Employees Retirement Association....................................................................................42 Continuation of Group Health and Dental Insurance....................................................................42 Post Retirement Health Care Savings Plan....................................................................................43 ACKNOWLEDGMENT.............................................................................................................44 APPENDIX 142286v ll ii INTRODUCTION Welcome to the City Welcome to the City of Orono. We are happy to have you as an employee and look forward to a productive employment relationship with you. Orono is a unique "rural oasis," and we hope you enjoy working with and for Orono's citizens during your tenure with the City. Conduct as a City Employee This handbook contains personnel policies and procedures approved by the City Council that govern City employee relations. These policies and procedures are guidelines only and are not to be construed as contractual terms of employment. Any aspect of these policies and procedures may be changed at any time at the sole discretion of the City Council without prior notice. The policies and procedures in this handbook have been established in accordance with applicable laws, ordinances and governmental regulations. If it is determined that any provision of this handbook is contrary to any law, ordinance or governmental regulation, that provision will become void and the law, ordinance or governmental regulation will be in full force and effect. Employees covered by a collective bargaining agreement for any of the provisions in this handbook will be governed by the collective bargaining agreement with regard to those provisions. Employees covered by an employment contract for any of the provisions in the handbook will be governed by the employment contract with regard to those provisions. In the event any provision of this handbook is determined to be contrary to the provisions of a particular City department manual, the provisions within the particular department manual will control. It is the responsibility of each employee to know all of the policies and procedures contained in this handbook. Violation of the policies and procedures may be grounds for disciplinary action up to and including discharge. Each employee will be issued a copy of this handbook. The employee is required to read the handbook and to sign an acknowledgement stating that they have read, understand, and agree to comply with the handbook policies and procedures. Besides these personnel policies and procedures, employees are expected to read and be familiar with the special orders, training bulletin, and other publications specific to the 142286v11 employee's job performance or job safety. Employees are expected to develop the same familiarity with these publications as with this handbook. Employees are also expected to maintain and update these publications in their employee handbook. In accepting City employment, employees become representatives of the City and are responsible for assisting and serving the citizens for whom they work. An employee's primary responsibility is to serve the residents of Orono. Employees should exhibit conduct that is ethical, professional, responsive, and of standards becoming of a City employee. To achieve this goal, employees must adhere to established policies, rules, and procedures and follow the instructions of their supervisors. The following are a sample listing of the job requirements for every employee at the City of Orono. Each employee's performance obligations include, but are not limited to: • Perform assigned duties to the best of their ability at all times. • Render prompt and courteous service to the public at all times. • Read, understand and comply with the policies and procedures as well as those of their department. • Conduct themselves with decorum toward both the public and staff and respond to inquiries and information requests with patience and every possible courtesy. • Report any and all unsafe conditions to the immediate supervisor. • Maintain good attendance. Employer Authority The City Council retains the full and unrestricted right to operate and manage all personnel, facilities, and equipment; to establish functions and programs; to set and amend budgets; to determine the use of technology; to establish and modify the organizational structure; to select, direct and determine the number of personnel; to establish work schedules; to perform any inherent managerial function; and to amend this handbook at any time. Employment at Will The City Council reserves the right to discharge any employee at any time for any reason or for no reason at all. The provisions of this handbook do not establish terms and shall not be construed as contractual provisions for any City employees. No supervisor or City representative has any authority to enter into any agreement for employment for any specific period of time, or to make any agreement contrary to this provision. Nothing in this handbook, or in other City policies that may be communicated to the employee, constitutes a contract of employment for any City employees. 2 142286x12 EEO Policy Statement The City of Orono is committed to providing equal opportunity in all areas of employment, including but not limited to hiring, demotion, transfer, recruitment, selection, lay- off, disciplinary action, termination, compensation and selection for training. The City of Orono will not discriminate against any employee or job applicant on the basis of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, ancestry, sex, sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, veteran status, or membership on a local human rights commission. 142286x12 EMPLOYMENT Recruitment System The City Administrator or a designee will manage the hiring process for positions within the City. While the hiring process may be coordinated by staff, the City Council is responsible for the final hiring decision and must approve all hires to City employment. All hires will be made according to merit and fitness related to the position being filled. The City Administrator or designee will determine if a vacancy will be filled through an open recruitment or by promotion, transfer or some other method. This determination will be made on a case-by-case basis. The majority of position vacancies will be filled through an open recruitment process. Probationary Period Purpose: The probationary period will be regarded as an integral part of the examination process and will be utilized for closely observing the employee's work, for securing the most effective adjustment of the employee to this position and for rejecting any employee whose performance does not meet the required standards. Employment remains "AT WILL" both during and following the probationary period. Duration: All appointments will be subject to a twelve (12) month probationary period after appointment. The City can extend the probationary period beyond twelve months for such period of time as the City at its discretion deems fit and necessary. At any time during the probationary period, any employee may be transferred or dismissed at the City's discretion. Applies to Promotions: All promotions will be subject to a six (6) month probationary period. If the employee who has been promoted is found unsuited for the work of the position to which promoted, the employee may be reinstated to the position, to the extent the position is still available. The employee will receive the rate of pay of the position from which the employee was promoted. Affects Leave Benefits: During the initial probationary period, but not during a promotional period, an employee will not be entitled to vacation leave except by written approval of the City Administrator. After 6 months of employment, an employee will be entitled to vacation leave accrued from the start of employment. Sick leave will accrue and accrued sick leave may be used during probation. How Completed: An employee who has completed probationary service and has not received a written notice from the City Administrator that the employee's services are terminated will be considered to have successfully completed the probationary period and will automatically receive status as a regular employee. Regular employees remain "AT WILL" employees. 4 142286x12 Physical and Psychological Examinations Applicants, who are offered employment with the City of Orono after the offer is made, but prior to commencement of employment, may be required to pass a pre-employment physical examination, which may include a medical history, for the purpose of determining the applicant's capability to perform available employment. The examination will test only for essential job related abilities and the examination will be required of all persons conditionally offered employment regardless of disability. Applicants must meet job-related physical standards. A physical examination will be required of employees who are offered new employment with the City that requires the employee to meet different physical standards to determine the employee's capability to perform the new employment. The offer of new employment will be made on condition that the new employee meets the physical or mental requirements of the new job. The examination will test only for essential job related abilities. The examination will be required of all employees conditionally offered new employment regardless of disability. Applicants for employment with the City of Orono may be required to undergo a psychological examination for the purpose of determining the applicant's capability to perform available employment. The psychological examination will only be required when the offer of employment is made on the condition that the person meets the mental requirements of the job offered. The psychological examination will test only for essential job related abilities. The psychological examination will be required of all persons conditionally offered employment for the position offered regardless of disability. The City will designate a physician and psychologist to perform all City required examinations for new employment or a new position. The examination will be done at City expense. Employment of Relatives An applicant related to any elected or appointed official or employee will not be considered for employment or volunteer work in a department or work situation where the relative would also be employed if it would result in a conflict of interest. The words "related" or "relative" for the purpose of this policy will mean: mother, father, legal guardian, spouse, son, daughter, brother or sister. Conflict of interest means: a. Where one employee would supervise or have the authority to appoint, remove or discipline a relative. b. Where one relative would be responsible for auditing the work of another relative C. Where circumstances exist which would place a relative in a situation of actual or foreseeable conflict between the City's interests and the relative's interest. 142286x12 d. Where the employment of a relative of a policy level employee of an organization with whom the City deals would give the appearance of improper influence or favor. Where confidentiality of the City would be jeopardized. Promotions or transfers of a relative which would result in a conflict of interest will not be acted upon until the conflict is satisfactorily resolved. Promotions/Transfers/Demotions Vacancies in municipal service will be filled by promotion of regular City employees when possible based on the relative qualifications of all applicants. However, the City reserves the right to hire the best qualified applicant for the positions and to determine how vacancies will be advertised. All promotions will be subject to a probationary period of six (6) months. Promoted employees will be entitled to vacation leave during a probationary promotion period if they have fulfilled the requirements for vacation time in their prior position. If an employee is transferred, promoted or demoted, the rate of pay will be determined as follows: a. In the case of a transfer or promotion, if the rate of pay for the former position is less than the minimum rate established for the new position, the rate will be advanced to the minimum of the position to which transferred or promoted. b. In the case of a transfer or demotion, if the rate of pay in the former position is more than the maximum rate established for the new position, the rate of pay may be reduced to the maximum rate or to an intermediate rate of the position to which transferred or demoted. Such determination will be made by the City Administrator. C. In case of a transfer for the good of the City and/or the employee and not in the nature of a promotion or demotion, the rate of pay will remain the same. Prohibitions An applicant for City employment or a City employee seeking promotion must not directly or indirectly render any service or pay any money or other valuable consideration to any person for or in connection with the applicant's or employee's employment test or proposed appointment or promotion. 6 142286x12 Appointments and Veterans' Preference All appointments to positions of City employment will be based on merit and qualifications of the applicants for the position to be filled. To evaluate the merit and qualifications of the applicants, criteria will be established for each such position. The criteria established must be capable of being reduced to a 100 -point rating system. A 100 -point system must be applied to all positions of City employment except for those positions specifically exempted from the Veterans' Preference Act, Minn. Stat. § 43A.11, by Minn. Stat. § 197.46. In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 43A.11 and Minn. Stat. § 197.455, a credit of five points will be added to a veteran's rating at the election of the veteran so long as the City position being sought is not exempted from veterans' preference by Minn. Stat. § 197.46. The receipt of the credit is conditional on the veteran obtaining a passing rating under the criteria and 100 -point system established for the position without the addition of the credit points. In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 43A.I I and Minn. Stat. § 197.455, a credit of ten points will be added to a disabled veteran's rating at the election of the disabled veteran so long as the City position being sought is exempted from veterans' preference by Minn. Stat. § 197.46. The receipt of the credit is conditional on the veteran obtaining a passing rating under the criteria and 100 -point system established for the position without the addition of the credit points. Outside Employment Full-time employees shall not engage in outside employment which might in any way hinder the objectives and performance of their duties or impair their efficiency on the job. Employees shall not engage in any outside employment within the City limits if it is within the normal scope of the employee's duties with the City to participate in the regulation, licensing, inspection or exercise of judgmental discretion with regard to that type of activity. The policy will not apply to isolated activities approved in advance in writing by the City Council if the City Council determines that the activity will not create nor appear to create any appearance of impropriety. Definitions The following words used in this handbook are defined to mean: "Full-time employee" means a City employee who is employed on a schedule that averages at least 40 hours per week per calendar year and excludes elected officials, part-time employees and seasonal employees. "Part-time employee" means a City employee who is employed on a schedule of less than 40 hours per week. "Temporary employee" means a City employee who has been appointed for either full- time or part-time work on a temporary basis for a period not to exceed 6 months. 7 142286x12 "Seasonal employee" means an employee who is hired for a season or temporary time period. Temporary and Regular Part -Time Employment Temporary employees and employees who are hired for positions requiring an average of less than 20 hours per week will not be entitled to sick leave, vacation leave, holiday pay or insurance benefits, except for workers compensation insurance. An employee on a temporary part-time status does not accumulate service time. Regular employees who are hired for positions requiring less than full time but 20 hours of work per week or more may be granted certain employee benefits and service time based on actual hours worked, as determined by the City Administrator and the City Council and as may be required by law. An employee on a temporary or regular part-time status will be entitled to such public employee benefits as may be provided under the Public Employment Labor Relations Act, Minn. Stat., Chapter 179A. Service Time Service time is the employee's length of continuous service with the City. Upon a successful completion of the probationary period, service time will be accumulated from the first day of hire. From time to time, personal circumstances, illness or civic duty may require an employee's absence from work for periods of varying duration. Authorized leaves of absence for vacation leave, sick leave, funeral leave, leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act, school conference and activities leave, sick child care leave, military leave, bone marrow donation leave, organ donation leave, and jury duty will not interrupt the accumulation of continuous service, provided the employee meets the conditions required by the City of such leaves. Resignation Any employee wishing to leave City employment in good standing must file with the employee's department head, at least fourteen (14) days before leaving, a written resignation stating the effective date of the resignation and the reason for leaving. Department heads must give at least thirty (30) days advance written notice to the City Administrator. Failure to comply with this particular procedure may be cause for denying such employee future employment by the City and denying termination leave benefits. Unauthorized absence from work for a period of three (3) working days may be considered by the department head as a resignation, without benefits. 142286x12 An employee who has resigned from a position may be considered for re-employment but will have no inherent right to the employee's former position. 142286x12 RULES AND PERSONAL CONDUCT Respectful Workplace Policy The intent of this policy is to provide general guidelines about the conduct that is and is not appropriate in the workplace. The City acknowledges that this policy cannot possibly predict all situations that might arise, and also recognizes that some employees are exposed to disrespectful behavior, and even violence, by the very nature of their jobs. Maintaining a respectful work environment is a shared responsibility. This policy is applicable to all City personnel including regular and temporary employees, volunteers, firefighters, and City Council members. While the City has a strong commitment to customer service, the City does not expect that employees accept verbal abuse from any customer. An employee may request that a supervisor intervene when a customer is abusive, or they may defuse the situation themselves, including ending the contact. If there is a concern over the possibility of physical violence, a supervisor should be contacted immediately. When extreme conditions dictate, 911 should be called. Employees should leave the area immediately when violence is imminent unless their duties require them to remain. Employees must notify their supervisor about the incident as soon as possible. The following types of behavior cause a disruption in the workplace and are, in many instances, unlawful: Violent behavior includes the use of physical force, harassment, or intimidation. Discriminatory behavior includes inappropriate remarks about or conduct related to a person's race, color, creed, religion, national origin, disability, sex, marital status, age, sexual orientation, status with regard to public assistance, veteran's status, or membership on a local human rights commission. Offensive behavior may include such actions as: rudeness, angry outbursts, inappropriate humor, vulgar obscenities, name calling, disrespectful language, or any other behavior regarded as offensive to a reasonable person. It is not possible to anticipate in this policy every example of offensive behavior. Accordingly, employees are encouraged to discuss with their fellow employees and supervisor what is regarded as offensive, taking into account the sensibilities of employees and the possibility of public reaction. Although the standard for how employees treat each other and the general public will be the same throughout the City, there may be differences between work groups about what is appropriate in other circumstances unique to a work group. If an employee is unsure whether a particular behavior is appropriate, the employee should request clarification from their supervisor or the City Administrator. 10 142286x12 Sexual harassment can consist of a wide range of unwanted and unwelcome sexually directed behavior such as unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature when: • Submitting to the conduct is made either explicitly or implicitly a term or condition of an individual's employment; or • Submitting to or rejecting the conduct is used as the basis for an employment decision affecting an individual's employment; or • Such conduct has the purpose or result of unreasonably interfering with an individual's work performance or creating an intimidating, hostile or offensive work environment. Sexual harassment includes, but is not limited to, the following: • Unwelcome or unwanted sexual advances. This means stalking, patting, pinching, brushing up against, hugging, cornering, kissing, fondling or any other similar physical contact considered unacceptable by another individual. • Verbal or written abuse, kidding, or comments that are sexually -oriented and considered unacceptable by another individual. This includes comments about an individual's body or appearance where such comments go beyond mere courtesy, telling "dirty jokes" or any other tasteless, sexually oriented comments, innuendos or actions that offend others. • Requests or demands for sexual favors. This includes subtle or obvious expectations, pressures, or requests for any type of sexual favor, along with an implied or specific promise of favorable treatment (or negative consequence) concerning one's current or future job. Possession and Use of Dangerous Weapons Possession or use of a dangerous weapon, as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 609.02, subdivision 6, is prohibited on City property, in City vehicles, or in any personal vehicle, which is being used for City business. This includes employees with valid permits to carry firearms. The following exceptions to the dangerous weapons prohibition are as follows: • Employees legally in possession of a firearm for which the employee holds a valid permit, if required, and said firearm is secured within an attended personal vehicle or concealed from view within a locked unattended personal vehicle while that person is working on City property. • A person who is showing or transferring the weapon or firearm to a police officer as part of an investigation. • Police officers and employees who are in possession of a weapon or firearm in the scope of their official duties. 11 142286x12 Employee Response to Disrespectful Workplace Behavior Employees who believe that disrespectful behavior is occurring are encouraged to deal with the situation in one of the ways listed below. However, if the allegations involve violent behavior, sexual harassment, or discriminatory behavior, then the employee is responsible for taking one of the actions below. If employees see or overhear a violation of this policy, they are encouraged to follow the steps below. Step 1(a). Politely, but firmly, tell whoever is engaging in the disrespectful behavior how you feel about their actions. Politely request the person to stop the behavior because you feel intimidated, offended, or uncomfortable. If practical, bring a witness with you for this discussion. Step 1(b). If you fear adverse consequences could result from telling the offender or if the matter is not resolved by direct contact, go to your supervisor or City Administrator. The person to whom you speak is responsible for documenting the issues and for giving you a status report on the matter as soon as practicable. Step 1(c). In the case of violent behavior, all employees are required to report the incident immediately to their supervisor, City Administrator or Police Department. Any employee who observes sexual harassment or discriminatory behavior, or receives any reliable information about such conduct, must report it within two (2) business days to a supervisor or the City Administrator. Step 2. If, after what is considered to be a reasonable length of time (for example, 30 days), you believe inadequate action is being taken to resolve your complaint/concern, the next step is to report the incident to the City Administrator or the Mayor. Supervisor's Response to Allegations of Disrespectful Workplace Behavior Employees who have a complaint of disrespectful workplace behavior will be taken seriously. In the case of sexual harassment or discriminatory behavior, a supervisor must report the allegations within two (2) business days to the City Administrator, who will determine whether an investigation is warranted. A supervisor must act upon such a report even if requested otherwise by the victim. In situations other than sexual harassment and discriminatory behavior, supervisors will use the following guidelines when an allegation is reported: Step 1. If the nature of the allegations and the wishes of the victim warrant a simple intervention, the supervisor may choose to handle the matter informally. The supervisor may conduct a coaching session with the offender, explaining the impact of his/her actions and requiring that the conduct not reoccur. This approach is particularly appropriate when there is some ambiguity about whether the conduct was disrespectful. Step 2. The supervisor must notify the City Administrator about the allegations. 12 142286x12 Step 3. If a formal investigation is warranted, the City Administrator or their designee shall conduct the investigation. The individual alleging a violation of this policy will be interviewed to discuss the nature of the allegations. The person being interviewed may have someone of his/her own choosing present during the interview. The investigator will obtain the following description of the incident, including date, time and place. • Corroborating evidence. • A list of witnesses. • Identification of the offender. Step 4. As soon as practical after receiving the written or verbal complaint, the alleged policy violator will be informed of the allegations. The alleged violator will have the opportunity to answer questions and respond to the allegations. Step 5. After adequate investigation and consultation with the appropriate personnel, a decision will be made regarding whether or not disciplinary action will be taken. Step 6. The alleged violator and complainant will be advised of the findings and conclusions as soon as practicable. Special Reporting Requirements When the supervisor is perceived to be the cause of a disrespectful workplace behavior incident, a report will be made to the City Administrator who will assume the responsibility for investigation and discipline. If the City Administrator is perceived to be the cause of a disrespectful workplace behavior incident, a report will be made to the City Attorney who will confer with the Mayor and City Council regarding appropriate investigation and action. If a Council Member is perceived to be the cause of a disrespectful workplace behavior incident involving City personnel, the report will be made to the City Administrator and referred to the City Attorney who will undertake the necessary investigation. The City Attorney will report his/her findings to the City Council, which will take the action it deems appropriate. Pending completion of the investigation, the City Administrator may at his/her discretion take appropriate action to protect the alleged victim, other employees, or citizens. Confidentiality A person reporting or witnessing a violation of this policy cannot be guaranteed anonymity. The person's name and statements may have to be provided to the alleged offender. All complaints and investigative materials will be contained in a file separate from the involved employees' personnel files. If disciplinary action does result from the investigation, the results of the disciplinary action will then become a part of the employee's personnel file(s). 13 142286x12 Retaliation Consistent with the terms of applicable statutes and City personnel policies the City may discipline any individual who retaliates against any person who reports alleged violations of this policy. The City may also discipline any individual who retaliates against any participant in an investigation, proceeding or hearing relating to the report of alleged violations. Retaliation includes, but is not limited to, any form of intimidation, reprisal, or harassment. Disciplinary Action City employees are subject to disciplinary actions for failing to fulfill their duties and responsibilities, including failure to observe policies, procedures, and work rules. It is the policy of the City to administer disciplinary penalties without discrimination. A supervisor or department head will investigate any allegation for which disciplinary action might be based before any disciplinary action is taken. Employees serve at the will of the City Council and notwithstanding anything in this handbook, may be dismissed with or without cause. The City reserves total discretion for determining the level of discipline and may skip steps when it deems appropriate to do so. Disciplinary action for violating basic rules of conduct, policies, procedures or practices, or unsatisfactory job performance, may result in oral reprimand, written reprimand, paid or unpaid suspension, demotion, or immediate termination of employment. These disciplinary measures do not constitute an exclusive list of possible actions and action may be taken in any order. a. An employee may be given an oral reprimand by the employee's immediate supervisor. Documentation of the oral reprimand will be placed in the employee's personnel file. b. An employee may be given a written reprimand by the employee's immediate supervisor. A written reprimand will state that the employee is being warned for misconduct. The written reprimand will contain a description of the misconduct, past action taken by the supervisor to correct the problem, a statement urging prompt correction or improvement by the employee, time tables and goals for improvement when appropriate, and an outline of future penalties that may be imposed should the misconduct continue. The employee will be given a copy of the reprimand after the employee signs the original acknowledging its receipt. The signature of the employee on the reprimand will not mean that the employee agrees with the reprimand. The reprimand will be placed in the employee's personnel file. C. An employee may be suspended with pay by the employee's immediate supervisor. The immediate supervisor shall notify the City Administrator of the suspension with pay. The suspension with pay will continue only upon the approval of the City Administrator. Upon the City Administrator's approval of the suspension, the employee will be notified in writing of the reason for the suspension and its length. Upon the employee's return to work, the employee will be provided a written statement outlining further disciplinary actions that may be taken should the misconduct continue. Suspension with pay will include suspending an employee pending investigation of allegations of misconduct against the employee. All 14 142286x12 suspensions with pay will be reduced to writing and placed in the employee's personnel file. If the suspension with pay is for investigation of allegations of misconduct and the allegations prove to be false, the written suspension with pay will be removed from the employee's personnel file. d. An employee may be suspended without pay only by the City Administrator. An immediate supervisor may suspend an employee with pay pending a decision by the City Administrator to suspend the employee without pay. Prior to the suspension without pay or as soon thereafter as possible, the employee will be notified in writing of the reason for the suspension without pay and its length. Upon the employee's return to work, the employee will be provided a written statement outlining further disciplinary actions that may be taken against the employee should the misconduct continue. An employee may be suspended without pay by the City Administrator pending the investigation of allegations of misconduct. The suspension without pay will be reduced to writing and placed in the employee's personnel file. If the suspension without pay is for investigation of allegations of misconduct and the allegations prove to be false, the written suspension without pay will be removed from the employee's personnel file and the employee will be entitled to any compensation to which the employee is entitled had the suspension not taken place. e. An employee may be involuntarily demoted, required to transfer to a comparable employment position, or have the employee's salary decreased or the employee's salary increase withheld by the City Administrator. In no event will an employee's salary be decreased below the salary schedule approved for the employee's position by the City Council. Prior to such action or as soon thereafter as possible, the employee will be notified of the reason for the action. The action taken will be reduced to writing and placed in the employee's personnel file. f. Any employee may be dismissed by the City Administrator with approval of the City Council. Veterans' Preference Act Exception: Notwithstanding the possible disciplinary actions listed in this handbook, no City employee who is a veteran as defined by Minn. Stat. § 197.447 may be removed from City employment, except in accordance with and as provided by Minn. Stat. § 197.46. Hearing: In the case of suspension, dismissal, or demotion, an employee will be provided an opportunity for a review before the City Council if the employee submits a written request for a review to the City Administrator within five (5) working days of notification of the action taken. Drug and Alcohol Testing The City recognizes drug and alcohol abuse by employees may threaten the welfare of the public and the well being of the other employees. Therefore, the City has established drug and alcohol testing for positions covered by this handbook as a means of protecting the public safety and welfare and employees well being. 15 142286x12 Employees who are required to hold a commercial driver's license (CDL) are subject to the "City of Orono's Drug and Alcohol Testing Policy for Commercial Driver's License Holders," which shall be distributed at time of hire. Non -CDL Drug and Alcohol Testing Policy The intent of this section is to prevent drug and alcohol abuse by employees and to offer the opportunity for rehabilitation of employees who have tested positively for drug and alcohol use while on duty. The City shall inform a job applicant prior to testing. Information shall include the City's right to request a test, the processing of a test, the consequences of testing positively, and the rights of the employee. Before requesting an employee or a job applicant to undergo drug or alcohol testing, the City shall provide the employee or job applicant with a form developed by the City on which to acknowledge the employee or job applicant has reviewed the Policy. On an additional form, the employee or job applicant may indicate any over-the-counter or prescription medications that they are currently taking or have recently taken and any other information relative to the liability of or explanation for a positive test result. This form will be completed at the collection site and will not be reviewed by the employer. Random drug or alcohol testing of employees is prohibited. The City shall not require an employee to undergo drug or alcohol testing except in the following circumstances: a. The City may require a job applicant to undergo drug testing provided a job offer has been made to the applicant and the same test is required of all job applicants conditionally offered employment for that position. If the job is withdrawn the City shall inform the applicant of the reasons for its actions. b. The supervisor in charge may require an employee to undergo drug or alcohol testing provided a reasonable attempt has been made to receive approval from the City Administrator, that said requirement is stated in writing, and there is reasonable suspicion that the employee: i) is under the influence of drugs or alcohol; ii) is found to personally possess illicit drugs or alcohol while on duty; iii) sustained a personal injury or caused another employee to sustain a personal injury and the supervisor in charge has reasonable suspicion that drugs or alcohol were involved; or 16 142286x12 iv) has caused a work related accident or was helping to operate machinery, equipment, or vehicles involved in a work related accident and the supervisor in charge has reasonable suspicion that drugs or alcohol were involved. C. "Reasonable suspicion" shall be defined as that quantity of proof or evidence that is more than a hunch, but less than probably cause. Reasonable suspicion must be based on specific, objective facts and any rationally derived inferences from those facts about the conduct of an individual that would lead the reasonable person to suspect that the individual is or has been using drugs while on or off duty. d. The City may require an employee to undergo drug or alcohol testing if the employee has been referred to the City for chemical dependency treatment or evaluation which results in a determination that the employee is chemically dependent, in which case the employee may be required to undergo drug and alcohol testing without prior notice during the evaluation or treatment period and for a period of up to two (2) years following completion of any prescribed chemical dependency treatment program. Test sample collection shall be conducted in a manner which provides a high degree of security for the sample and freedom from adulteration. Employees may not be witnessed while submitting a urine sample. Administrative procedures and biologic testing of the samples shall be conducted to prevent the submission of fraudulent tests. All screening tests shall make use of a split sample which shall be used for confirmatory retests. Upon request, an employee shall be entitled to the presence of a representative before testing is administered. The testing may not be delayed for an unreasonable amount of time to allow the employee this opportunity. All samples shall be tested for CHEMICAL ADULTERATION, OPIATES, CANNABIS, PCP, COCAINE, AMPHETAMINES, BARBITURATES, BENZODIAZEPINES, AND ALCOHOL. The testing shall be done at a laboratory to be determined by the City and the following standards shall be used: DRUG � S G Amphetamines ng Barbiturates ng Benzodiazepine ng Cannabis ng Cocaine ng Opiates ng PCP ng Alcohol gm REENING TEST IR CONFIRMATION /ml Amphetamine ng/mg GC -MS /ml Barbiturate ng/ml GC -MS /ml Oxazepam ng/ml GC -MS /ml Delta -THC ng/ml GC -MS /ml Metabolite ng/ml GC -MS /ml Morphine, Codeine ng/ml GC -MS /ml PCP ng -ml GC -MS /dl Alcohol gm/dl GC -MS Any sample which has been altered or is shown to be a substance other than urine or blood shall be reported as such. All samples which test positive on a screening test shall be confirmed by gas chromatography -mass spectrophotometry, and no records of unconfirmed positive tests shall be released by the laboratory. 17 142286x12 Any sample which has been altered or is shown to be a substance other than urine or blood shall be reported as such. All samples which test positive on a screening test shall be confirmed by gas chromatography -mass spectrophotometry, and no records of unconfirmed positive tests shall be released by the laboratory. 17 142286x12 Initial screening tests and confirmatory tests shall be at the sole cost of the City. Testing and evaluation procedures shall be conducted in a manner to ensure that an employee's legal drug use does not affect the test results. All results shall be evaluated by a suitably trained occupational physician or occupational nurse prior to being reported. Within three (3) working days after receipt of test results from the testing laboratory, the City shall inform an employee or job applicant of a negative or positive test result on a confirmatory test. An employee has a right to offer the City a written explanation of a positive test result on a confirmatory test within three (3) working days after notice of the positive test result. Test results shall be treated with the same confidentiality as other employee medical records. Except as otherwise required by law or authorized by the employee, the test results shall not be reported outside the City organization. Each employee whose confirmatory tests indicate positive for drug or alcohol use shall be medically evaluated by a substance abuse professional. If required by the substance abuse professional, the employee will then be counseled and treated for rehabilitation. At any time an employee may voluntarily enter the chemical dependency program. This program is designed to provide care and treatment to employees who are in need of rehabilitation. Details concerning treatment any employee receives at this program shall remain confidential between the City and employee and shall not be released to the public. The City shall not be responsible for the cost of the treatment. No employee shall be relieved of his or her position based on one positive confirmatory test result although the employee may be re-evaluated for his or her assignment. When undergoing treatment and evaluation, employees shall receive the usual compensation and fringe benefits provided at their assigned position provided the employee is using available accumulated leave. Each employee has the right to challenge the results of drug testing in the same manner that he or she may grieve any managerial action. Employees shall be subject to the disciplinary actions prescribed in this handbook if the employee: a. Refuses to undergo drug or alcohol testing; employee may refuse to undergo drug or alcohol testing of a blood sample upon religious grounds if they consent to testing of a urine sample. b. Fails to successfully complete a required rehabilitation program as prescribed by a substance abuse professional. C. Tests positively after completing the initial rehabilitation program. The employee may be given the opportunity to complete a second rehabilitation program. If the employee refuses to complete a second rehabilitation program or if he or she tests positively after the 18 142286x12 completion of a second rehabilitation program, disciplinary action as prescribed in this handbook may be applied. An employee may request a confirmatory retest of the original sample at the employee's own expense within five (5) days of receiving notice of a positive confirmatory test result. It shall be the responsibility of the employee to contact the City who will work with the employee to contact the laboratory which performed the original test and also make arrangements with the second federally certified laboratory to perform the confirmatory retest. If the confirmatory retest does not confirm the original positive test result, no adverse personnel action based on the original result may be taken against the employee and the City will reimburse the employee for the actual cost of the confirmatory retest. The employee, upon request and subject to approval of the testing laboratory will have the right to inspect and observe any aspect of the drug testing program. This drug testing program is solely initiated at the behest of the City for the safety and well-being of the public and employees. The City shall be solely liable for any legal obligations for its actions of requiring testing or for actions taken as a result of testing. This Policy is in no way intended to supersede or waive an employee's federal or state constitutional rights, or contractual rights. This Policy is subject to the interpretation of the state law pertaining to drug and alcohol testing. Employee Assistance Program The City has a contract with a private provider, whereby the employee can receive diagnostic referral assistance in such areas as parent/child relationships, marital problems, behavior problems, drug and alcohol, emotional and mental disorders and personal adjustment difficulties. The service is provided at no cost to the employee. All contact between the employee and the private provider is confidential. The employer does not receive information concerning employees as a result of the service. For more information, contact the City Clerk. Performance Evaluation Supervisors will conduct a performance evaluation for each of the employees whom they directly supervise. The first performance evaluation will generally occur at six (6) months and within thirty (3 0) days prior to the completion of the employee's twelve (12) month probationary period. After completion of the probationary period, performance evaluations are submitted annually by the supervisor on the employee's employment anniversary date. Performance evaluations may be performed more frequently if an employee's performance is not satisfactory. All evaluations will be discussed with the employee before submission. The performance evaluation reports are retained in the employee's personnel file. 19 142286x12 Safety Program The City will endeavor through its safety program to assist all departments in their efforts to maintain a safe and healthy work place; provide safe working equipment; inform employees of proper work habits and procedures which will maximize the potential of an accident -free work environment; monitor the existence of proper first aid and emergency equipment and procedures as well as employee knowledge and training in the use of such equipment and procedures; and insure the availability and speedy access of City employees to emergency medical services in the event of an accident or medical emergency. The City safety program provides: a. Safety inspections of the work place environment, machines and equipment, procedures and work habits, as well as access to first aid and emergency medical support access. b. Incident or complaint review of specific work locations, accidents or injuries, machines, or equipment; recommended work habits or procedures to be carried out in the event of a lost -time accident, a reported or suspected health hazard, an employee complaint, or a supervisor's request. C. Safety and protection procedures that make known to employees the existence of potential health hazards, proper protective procedures, and safety and health rules and requirements, as well as emergency procedures. d. Safety education programs which provide safety information and training to employees through demonstrations, training sessions, and verbal and written communications. e. Program enforcement through managers and supervisors who are knowledgeable in safety procedures, who promulgate safe safety attitudes, and who publish and enforce compliance with employee safety and health rules and regulations within the sphere of their work authority. The responsibilities for safety must be shared. a. City Administrator. The City Administrator is provided with the authority to establish, promulgate and enforce City-wide safety and health procedures, rules and regulations. The City Administrator will appoint a safety coordinator who is charged with directing all recommendations for modification to safety and health policies, procedures, standards and practices to the City Administrator. b. Department Heads and Supervisors. Department heads and supervisors will be responsible for instructing employees within their departments on safe practices to be observed in the work place and enforcing safety standards and requirements to the best of their ability and authority. 20 142286x12 C. Employees. Each employee is expected to place safe work practices and identification of unsafe conditions as the highest priority while performing their work duties. Each employee's safety and health commitment includes, but is not limited to, the following: • Using appropriate safety equipment. • Wearing required dress/uniform and footwear. • Warning co-workers of unsafe conditions or practices that could lead to or cause an accident. • Operate equipment only after receiving proper training. • Reporting defective or damaged equipment. • Reporting dangerous, unsafe or unhealthy conditions that exist in the work place as well as throughout the City. • Reporting of all injuries and accidents within twenty-four (24) hours. • Taking proper protective measures to minimize unsafe conditions that could present a hazard to the public resulting from City work. • Maintaining tools and equipment in a proper manner, to ensure that they are in the best possible condition during usage. The Public Works Department has adopted a safety manual. The Police Department has a policy manual that lays out safety policies. Report Injuries It is the injured employee's responsibility to immediately report any work related injury or disease to the employee's supervisor as soon as possible after the injury occurs or the disease is diagnosed. The immediate supervisor is responsible to see that the First Report of Injury is filed with the City Administrator's office within forty-eight (48) hours following the injury. This report is prepared by the supervisor during an interview (if possible) with the injured employee. Political Activity Employees have the right to express their views and to pursue legitimate involvement in the political system. Thus, an employee may be a member of a political party, established political organization or club, attend political meetings, exercise the right to vote free from interference, and seek election or appointment to public office. However, no employee shall directly or indirectly, during hours of employment, solicit or receive funds for political purposes. If any employee is elected or appointed to the City Council, the employee must resign or obtain a leave of absence. Lost and Abandoned Property City employees that find lost or abandoned property in the City of Orono during the course of their employment shall deliver the property to the Police Department. 21 142286x12 The Chief of Police is authorized to administer the disposal of property lawfully coming into the possession of the City and remaining unclaimed by the owner after sixty (60) days. Disposal shall be by sale to the highest bidder at public auction or sale, including electronic auction. A notice specifying the date, time and place of the auction or sale shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation throughout the City at least one week prior to such auction or sale. The net proceeds of sale shall be placed in the City's General Fund, subject to the right of the former owner to payment of the net proceeds upon application and presentation of satisfactory proof of ownership within six (6) months of the sale. "Net proceeds" means the sale price less all costs of handling, storage, or sale. Travel Approval and Advances All travel and seminar attendance by City employees require prior approval by the appropriate department head and the City Administrator or the City Administrator's designee. All travel and seminar attendance by the City Administrator must be in accordance with the City's adopted budget. Travel requests must be submitted on a Travel Authorization Request form. Information provided will include: reason for travel, duration of stay, method of travel, estimated expenditures, and amount of required advance based on allowable expenses. Approval for travel must be obtained prior to seminar registration or other final travel arrangements. Approval must be requested at least seventy-two (72) hours prior to departure. Attendance at training or conferences out of state is approved only if the training or conference is not available locally. All requests for out of state travel are reviewed for approval/disapproval by the City Administrator. Allowable Expenses Hotel/Lodging: Accommodations must be selected at reasonable cost, consistent with the facility available and convenient to location of the conference or business meeting attended. An employee may claim only the actual and necessary cost of single occupancy. Transportation: Allowable transportation costs will include reimbursement for: mileage accumulated on personal vehicle at prevailing mileage rate; actual round trip coach rate air fare; or actual receipted expenses for City owned vehicles, as required and as approved. Meals and Miscellaneous: Reimbursement for meals will be made at reasonable cost, as required and as approved. Except as otherwise authorized by the City Administrator, costs shall be reimbursed up to $35.00 a day for meals. An explanation must be included for cost of meals exceeding per diem guideline of approved Travel Authorization Request. 22 142286x12 Telephone: Reimbursement for long distance telephone calls will be allowed for City business and one call to a family member per day of 10 minutes or less. Miscellaneous: Other miscellaneous expenses may be authorized, as required and as approved. Employee Expense Reports Within five (5) working days upon return to work, an employee must submit an Employee Expense Report for approval by the employee's department head and City Administrator or the City Administrator's designee. Detailed receipts for expense items must accompany each expense report. Use of Vehicles An employee on City business is required to use a City vehicle if possible. All use of City vehicles must be approved by the employee's immediate supervisor. An employee using a City vehicle must have a valid driver's license in the appropriate class. Any violation of this provision may subject the employee to disciplinary action up to and including termination. Employees using City vehicles must be particularly mindful of all traffic regulations and courtesies of the road. Abuses and violations may subject the employee to disciplinary action, up to and including termination. Unless approved by the City Council or City Administrator, the use of City vehicles for personal reasons is prohibited. Violation of this provision may subject the employee to disciplinary action. Use of a private vehicle for City business must receive prior approval from the employee's immediate supervisor. The mileage rate for reimbursement shall be at the prevailing IRS reimbursement mileage rate. Claims shall be submitted to the Finance Director on a claim form provided by the City and shall be itemized, showing the date, destination, purpose of the trip, and mileage, and be signed by the person making the claim. Mileage reimbursement shall be made upon City Council approval of the claim. Employees using their personal vehicle and claiming mileage reimbursement on City business shall assume liability through the employee's own vehicle insurance carrier for personal injury, property damage, and comprehensive/collision damage to their vehicle. Any traffic violations incurred while on City business are the responsibility of the employee to satisfy. Use of the employee's private vehicle for City business must also meet requirements of the U.S. Internal Revenue Service as to the reporting of claims for mileage paid by the City. An accident while on City business with either a City vehicle or a private vehicle shall be immediately reported verbally to the supervisor and to the Administration Department. This initial report shall be followed up with completion of the required insurance carrier form and pertinent incident reports as soon as possible. 23 142286x12 Gifts City employees may not solicit or accept gifts from any person or company that has a direct financial interest in a decision that the City is authorized to make. No gift may be accepted from consultants, vendors, permit applicants, job applicants, local businesses, or others that have a financial interest in the decision the City may make. The only exceptions to the ban on gifts are: • services of insignificant monetary value; • a plaque or similar memento recognizing individual services in a field of specialty or a charitable cause; • a trinket or memento costing $5 or less; • informational material of insignificant value; • food or beverage given at a reception, meal, or meeting away from the employee's place of work by an organization before whom the employee appears to make a speech or answer questions as part of a program; • gifts given because of the employee's membership in group, a majority of whose members are not local officials, and an equivalent gift is given to the other members of the group; or • gifts given by a person who is a member of the employee's family unless the gift is given on behalf of someone who is not a member of the family. • gifts given by a national or multistate organization of governmental organizations or public officials, if a majority of the dues to the organization are paid from public funds, to attendees at a conference sponsored by that organization, if the gift is food or a beverage given at a reception or meal and an equivalent gift is given or offered to all other attendees. 24 142286x12 WORK SCHEDULING/TIME RECORDS Hours of Work In order to adequately provide City services and to provide the basis for employee compensation, the City must assure the availability of personnel and specify the number of hours and days the City expects employees to be at their jobs. Forty (40) hours of actual attendance on duty will constitute the regular work week for most full-time employees, with the average work month to be one hundred seventy-three and one-third (173-1/3) hours for the purpose of computing vacations, sick leave and fractions of a month's work. Except for modifications for summer hours or as otherwise provided by the City Council or City Administrator, the regular work day will begin at 8:00 a.m. and end at 4:30 p.m., with an unpaid on -half (1/2) hour lunch period. The lunch period will be scheduled by the department head in such a manner that service will always be afforded to the public. The regular work week will consist of five (5) consecutive eight (8) hour work days, Monday through Friday, or an equivalent number of hours pursuant to a work schedule arranged with the department head and approved by the City Administrator. Department heads, with prior approval of the City Administrator, may establish the scheduled hours of work for employees within their departments. Such hours cannot be less than the minimum hours described in this policy, but may vary for shift requirements and other times deemed necessary to properly provide City services beyond regular business hours. Flex -time schedules may be established only with the approval of the department head and City Administrator. Each employee must adhere to a schedule which has been established by taking into consideration the department work load and necessary services provided by the City. All overtime must be approved by the appropriate department head or the department head's designee prior to being worked. (See policy on overtime payment.) For payroll purposes, overtime will be rounded off to the nearest one-tenth (1/10th) of an hour. Work Time Requirement and Reporting Hourly employees are required to report their hours worked on the employee time report card. It shall be the responsibility of the employee to notify their supervisor prior to the time set for beginning work, or as provided by departmental rules, if unable to report to work as scheduled. Employees who fail to notify their supervisor of their inability to report for work 25 142286x12 shall be reported as absent without leave, and shall be subject to disciplinary action, including discharge. Employees are expected to be at their work areas at the start of their work day, and promptly return to their work areas at the conclusion of their lunch break. Supervisory, administrative, and management employees are expected to be on duty at the beginning of their scheduled work day and to report their location when they are out of their office to the department receptionist by giving the time they expect to return to the office and the destination of their travel. Department heads and supervisors must submit a time report to the City Administrator for approval. Pay Period The regular payday for all City employees is on alternating Wednesdays. The payroll is calculated for the two-week period through the Sunday prior to the Friday payday. Time slips must be completed and submitted to the employee's department time keeper by 12:00 noon Monday for the work week just ended. The employee's paycheck will be withheld until the time sheet is delivered to the City's finance department. When a payday falls on an official holiday, employees will receive their checks the preceding work day. Direct Deposit. You can have your paycheck automatically deposited in your checking or savings account on payday. Direct deposit authorization forms are available from the City Administrator's office. Overtime Payment Exempt employees under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), as designated by the City Council, are not eligible for overtime compensation. Overtime work performed by nonexempt employees will be compensated at one and one- half (1-1/2) times the regular rate of pay for all approved overtime in excess of forty (40) hours in any regular workweek. Vacation, sick leave and paid holidays are counted toward "hours worked." Supervisors are responsible to schedule work so as to minimize overtime payment. When authorized by the appropriate department head or designee, overtime payment will be made. Regular full-time nonexempt employees called out for special duty on a regularly scheduled holiday will be compensated at one and one-half (1-1/2) times their regular hourly rate of pay in addition to their holiday pay. 26 142286x12 Incidental time will be excluded from overtime consideration. Incidental overtime will mean overtime worked at the beginning or end of any nonexempt employee's shift in an amount not to exceed fifteen (15) minutes at either end of the work day. For payroll purposes, overtime will be rounded off to the nearest one-quarter (1/4) of an hour. Lunch Breaks and Rest Breaks Lunch or dinner breaks are unpaid and are for 30 minutes. Rest breaks are provided once in the first half of the scheduled 8 -hour work day and once in the second half. These breaks are limited to 15 minutes each and are to be taken at the job site when circumstances permit. Department heads are responsible for adopting any departmental rules specifically addressing such breaks. Closing Due to Adverse Weather Conditions When it is necessary to close operations due to adverse weather conditions, employees will be paid for the hours closed as approved at the discretion of the City Administrator. When City offices remain open, those employees who are unable to report to work may take their unused vacation leave to make up for time lost. Wage and Salary Schedules The wage and salary schedules and pay plans for positions with the City are established by resolutions adopted by the City Council and by labor agreements, approved by the City Council. These resolutions and agreements provide for wage and salary adjustments for the respective positions covered in them. These wage and salary schedules and pay plans may be adjusted from time to time to take into consideration changes in the cost of living as measured by the United States Department of Labor, market conditions, and valuations of positions. Attached to this policy is a copy of the appropriate resolutions or labor agreement which covers your position of employment. The resolution, or labor agreement, also provides the policy for the administration of the wage and salary schedules, and pay plans. If an employee has questions with regard to the applicable wage and salary schedule or pay plan, the employee may contact the employee's supervisor, the employee's department head, or the City Administrator. 27 142286x12 EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS Employment Benefits Employee benefits mentioned in this section apply only to those employees hired for regular, full-time positions and specifically exclude seasonal, contract, part-time, temporary or volunteer employees, except when such groups are expressly included by the provisions of this policy. Regular employees who are hired for positions requiring less than full time may be granted certain employee benefits enumerated in this handbook as determined by the City Administrator and City Council and as may be required by law, provided that the granting of such benefits will be based on a ratio of the employee's actual working hours as compared to full-time position of two thousand eighty (2080) hours per year unless otherwise required by law. Employee Insurance The following insurance policies are available to City employees: a. Life Insurance; b. Long-term Disability Insurance; C. Dentallnsurance; d. Health Insurance; and e. Short -Term Disability Insurance. The City Council shall establish by resolution from time to time providing a lump sum amount for eligible employees, which the employee may apply towards any of the available insurance options. The employee may be paid all or a portion of the lump sum in lieu of applying the funds towards an insurance benefit, provided the employee can show that the employee is covered through an alternate policy, e.g. through a spouse's insurance plan. Eligibility for Insurance Full-time and part-time employees working thirty (30) or more hours are eligible for insured benefits. The above referenced full-time and part-time employees will be covered on the first day of the month following employment with the City. Changes in Coverage The employee is responsible for notifying the Payroll Clerk of any changes that the employee wishes to make in the employee's insurance coverage or retirement plan, such as: a. Change of address or phone. b. Change of name. 28 142286x12 Change of beneficiary. d. Change in type of coverage. Change of marital status. f. Change in number of dependents. Worker's Compensation In accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota, the City provides coverage for medical expenses in the event of work related injury or disease, plus partial salary continuation in the event of disability, and additional benefits if the injury or disease causes partial or permanent disability or death. Employees are automatically covered under the workers' compensation plan as soon as employment begins. To be eligible for workers' compensation, the injury or disease must arise out of and occur during the course of employment. The City pays the entire cost of this protection. Benefits paid depend entirely on the benefit schedule set up by the State of Minnesota and applicable at the time the work related injury or disease is incurred. If an employee has a work-related injury or disease and is under a doctor's care, that employee cannot change doctors for treatment of this work-related injury or disease without first contacting the City's workers' compensation company and obtaining approval to make this change. Steel Toe Boots Reimbursement Public Works employees and the Golf Course Superintendent shall receive an annual reimbursement as established by resolution for the purchase of steel toe boots. The employee must submit the standard reimbursement form along with a receipt for the purchase. The reimbursement shall not exceed the annual amount established by City Council resolution. Employee Recognition The City recognizes that a formal employee recognition program is an important component of the City's benefit package and helps attract and retain quality employees. The City takes great satisfaction in the accomplishments of its employees and extends recognition in the following ways: 29 142286x12 Service Recognition The purpose of the employee recognition program is to acknowledge employees who have contributed years of service to the City of Orono and its citizens and recognize them with a token of appreciation for their dedication and commitment. Employee service recognition shall be based on an individual's length of service with the City of Orono. Length of service shall be based on consecutive years of service as an employee in a regular full-time or regular part-time position. Employee service recognition awards, provided by the City, will be given employees as follows: • 20 years: Certificate of Achievement and a watch The awards for years of service will be presented by the Mayor or designee, with assistance from the recipient's supervisor at an annual employee recognition event held during normal business hours. Employee recognition events shall include an annual luncheon or picnic. Annual Luncheon All regular full-time and part-time employees will be invited to attend the City's employee luncheon or picnic held during normal business hours to thank them for their work throughout the year. 30 142286x12 TIME OFF BENEFITS Request for Leave An employee is required to fill out a "Request for Leave" form, copy attached, for any time absent from regularly scheduled work time. Leave of Absence Reports are required for: a. Funeral Leave; b. Jury Duty; C. Medical Leave; d. Military Leave; e. Sick Leave with Pay; f. Vacation Leave; g. Compensatory Leave; h Parenting Leave; i. School Conference and Activities Leave; j. Sick Child Care Leave; k. Family and Medical Leave Act Leave (form is "Request for Family/Medical Leave"); 1. Bone Marrow Donation Leave; and in. Organ Donation Leave. The employee must also complete the weekly time sheets in a manner that will reflect any time off, using the categories as indicated above. Holidays The following legal holidays will be observed as paid holidays for all regular City employees: New Year's Day, January 1 Martin Luther King's Birthday, third Monday in January Presidents' Day, third Monday in February 31 142286x12 Memorial Day, last Monday in May Independence Day, July 4 Labor Day, first Monday in September Veterans Day, November 11 Thanksgiving Day, fourth Thursday in November The Day -After Thanksgiving, fourth Friday in November Christmas Eve Day, December 24 Christmas Day, December 25 One Designated Floating Holiday, to be set by the City Administrator Holidays falling on Sunday will be observed on Monday, and holidays falling on Saturday will be observed on Friday. Nonexempt employees who are required to be on duty on any holiday, or who agree to be on duty on any holiday, will be compensated at one and one-half (1-1/2) times their regular rate of pay for all hours worked. This pay shall be in addition to their holiday pay. Employees taking sick or vacation leave shall receive holiday pay in lieu of other pay. Holiday pay shall not be earned by any employee during a leave of absence without pay, suspension or time otherwise not worked or paid or otherwise not compensated. Vacation Leave All regular full-time employees are eligible for paid vacation leave. Vacation hours are earned based on calendar months of service and accrue as indicated below: 0 through 5 years of continuous service; 10 days (80 hours) 6 through 10 years of continuous service; 15 days (120 hours) 11 through 15 years of continuous service; 18 days (144 hours) 16 years of continuous service; 19 days (152 hours) 17 years of continuous service; 20 days (160 hours) 18 years of continuous service; 21 days (168 hours) 19 years of continuous service; 22 days (176 hours) 20 years and over of continuous service; 23 days (184 hours) Employees will not be allowed to accrue more than 240 hours of vacation leave. Once an employee accrues 240 hours they will not accrue additional time unless the number of hours drops below 240. New employees are not eligible to use vacation leave during the first six months of hire. After completing six months of employment, employees will be entitled to use the vacation leave 32 142286x12 accrued retroactive to hire. Employees who leave the City prior to completing six months of service are not eligible to receive any vacation play upon termination. Employees must submit a "Request for Leave" form, copy attached, to their department head and the City Administrator, as appropriate, at least two (2) weeks prior to the anticipated use of vacation leave. Exceptions to this policy are granted on a very limited basis, taking into consideration the operational needs of the City. To avoid scheduling issues, employees are encouraged to take consecutive days rather than one day at a time. Requests for vacation leave will be considered on a first come, first served basis. Only if the nature of the work makes it necessary to limit the number of employees on vacation at the same time, will the employee with the greater seniority be given the choice of vacation period so long as the employee's request is made thirty (30) days prior to the vacation time desired. Employees leaving their employment in "good standing" (provide a minimum of two weeks notice) will be compensated for vacation leave accrued up to the maximum amount permitted and unused to the date of separation. Employees using earned vacation leave will be considered to be working for the purpose of accruing leave. Except as otherwise provided, vacation leave shall not be earned by any employee during a leave of absence without pay, suspension or time otherwise not worked or paid, if such an absence exceeds ten (10) calendar days in the year. Sick Leave with Pay Sick leave with pay shall be granted to all probationary and regular employees at the rate of one (1), eight (8) hour working day for each calendar month of full-time service. For this purpose, one (1) calendar month shall be any month in which an employee is paid for twelve (12) or more working days (ninety-six [96] working hours). Seasonal/temporary employees are not eligible for sick leave accrual benefits. Employees will not be allowed to have more than 960 hours (120 working days) of sick leave on January 1St of each year. Once an employee accrues 960 hours they will not accrue additional time unless the number of hours drops below 960. Accrued sick leave with pay has no value upon termination or retirement except as provided in the "Severance Pay at Retirement / Termination of Employment in Good Standing / Sick Pay Handling at Termination" section of this handbook. Sick leave shall not be considered as a privilege or vested right which an employee may use at the employee's discretion, but shall be considered as a type of insurance which shall be allowed in case of necessity in an actual illness, legal quarantine, or disability of the employee, or to receive dental or medical care or other sickness preventative measures, approved by the supervisor. 33 142286x12 The employee must notify employee's department head or designee of the need for sick leave within one-half (1/2) hour of the beginning of the work day. Lack of proper notification may be cause for disciplinary action, and claiming sick leave when physically fit may be cause for disciplinary action, including transfer, suspension, demotion, or dismissal. In order to be eligible for sick leave with pay, an employee must: a. Report the reason for the absence within one-half (1/2) hour of the beginning of the work day to the department head. b. Submit a medical certificate for any absence of any duration, if required by the department head and City Administrator. The employee must complete a Request for Leave form before the employee will be granted sick leave pay. The use of sick leave will be prorated in units of not less than one (1) hour. An employee whose illness extends beyond the sick leave credit available may use available vacation leave and/or apply for a medical leave of absence. Employees using earned sick leave shall be considered to be working for the purpose of accumulating vacation or sick leave. An employee who has been unable to work for a period of time because of illness or accident may be required before being permitted to return to work to provide medical evidence that employee is again able to perform all significant duties of the position in a competent manner without hazard to employee or others. An employee who meets the other requirements of this section who is receiving worker's compensation payments may be granted sick leave pay for the amount of the difference between employee's worker's compensation payment and employee's salary to the extent that employee's sick leave is accrued. An employee may use sick leave for absences due to illness of the employee's immediate family for such reasonable periods as the employee's attendance with the immediately family member may be necessary, on the same terms the employee is able to use sick leave benefits for the employee's own illness. For the purpose of such sick child care leave, a "child" means an individual under 18 years of age or an individual under age 20 who is still attending secondary school. Sick leave may be used to care for a healthy child after birth, adoption, or foster care. Employees covered by a collective bargaining agreement shall be governed by said collective bargaining agreement in regard to policy on sick leave. 34 142286x12 Family and Medical Leave Family and Medical Reasons Eligibility Employee: Family and Medical leave ("FMLA leave") provides up to twelve (12) weeks of unpaid leave to an eligible employee for certain family and medical reasons. Employees are eligible if they have been employed for a minimum of twelve (12) months and have worked at least 1,250 hours for the City during the twelve (12) month period prior to requesting the leave. Maximum Leave: An employee may take a maximum of twelve (12) work weeks of FMLA leave in any rolling twelve (12) month period. Entitlement to Leave: FMLA leave may be granted for any of the following reasons: a. To care for the employee's child after birth, or placement for adoption or foster care; b. To care for the employee's spouse, son or daughter, or parent, who has a serious health condition; or C. For a serious health condition that makes the employee unable to perform the employee's job. Notice: The employee must give the City at least thirty (30) days advance notice that they will be taking FMLA leave. A "Request for Family/Medical Leave" form, copy attached, must be completed by the employee and returned to the immediate supervisor. In unexpected or unforeseeable situations, the employee should give as much notice as is practicable, usually verbal notice within one or two business days of when the need for leave becomes known, followed by a completed "Request for Family/Medical Leave" form. Serious Health Condition: A serious health condition is an illness or injury that is defined in the FMLA. For leaves taken because of the employee's or a covered family member's serious health condition, the City requires that either a "Certification of Health Care Provider for Employee's Serious Health Condition" or "Certification of Health Care Provider for Family Member's Serious Health Condition" form be completed within fifteen (15) days, which are available from the City Administrator. In addition, the City may require periodic reports on the employee's status and intent to return to work, and a fitness -for -duty report to return to work. Leave may be taken intermittently or on a reduced schedule when it is medically necessary. If an employee requests intermittent leave or leave on a reduced schedule that is foreseeable due to medical treatment, the employee may be temporarily transferred to another position if the position has equivalent pay and benefits and better accommodates the recurring periods of leave. Any such transfer is subject to a collective bargaining agreement. 35 142286x12 Fit for duty: The City may require a medical certificate attesting to the employee's fitness for duty prior to return to work. The fitness for duty report must be based on the particular health condition(s) for which the leave was approved and must address whether the employee can perform the essential functions of his/her regular job. The City Administrator may consult with a physician or other expert to determine reasonable accommodations for any employee who is a "qualified disabled" employee under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If a fitness for duty certification is required, the City may deny reinstatement until it is provided. Birth or Adoption: Eligibility for leave after birth, placement for adoption or foster care, expires twelve (12) months after the birth, adoption, or foster care placement. If the child must remain in the hospital longer than the mother, the leave may begin at any time up to six (6) weeks after the child leaves the hospital. Military Family Leave An eligible employee, as defined in the FMLA, shall be entitled to the following Military Family Leave under the FMLA: Qualifying Exigency: An eligible employee may take a total of twelve (12) work weeks of unpaid leave during a rolling twelve (12) month period because of any qualifying exigency, as defined in the FMLA, arising out of the fact that the spouse, a son, a daughter, or a parent of the employee is on active duty in the Armed Forces in support of a contingency operation. The employee must provide notice to the City as soon as practicable that they will be taking FMLA leave. The City requires the employee to provide a "Certification of Qualifying Exigency for Military Family Leave," which is available from the City Administrator. Military Caregiver Leave: An eligible employee is entitled to a total of twenty-six (26) work weeks of unpaid leave during a single twelve (12) month period to care for a servicemember, as defined in the FMLA. For purposes of Military Caregiver Leave, an eligible employee is the spouse, son, daughter, parent or next of kin of a covered servicemember. The employee must give the City at least thirty (30) days advance notice that they will be taking FMLA leave. In unexpected or unforeseeable situations, the employee should give as much notice as is practicable. The City requires the employee to provide a "Certification for Serious Injury or Illness of a Covered Servicemember for Military Family Leave," which is available from the City Administrator. Leave may be taken intermittently or on a reduced schedule when it is medically necessary. If an employee requests intermittent leave or leave on a reduced schedule that is foreseeable due to medical treatment, the employee may be temporarily transferred to another position if the position has equivalent pay and benefits and better accommodates the recurring periods of leave. Any such transfer is subject to a collective bargaining agreement. 36 142286x12 FMLA General Provisions Concurrent leave: During FMLA leave, an employee must use all appropriate paid leave before taking any unpaid leave. An employee may request leave time or the employer may designate an employee's leave time as FMLA time if it meets the definition under law. An employee may qualify for other leave programs in addition to FMLA (i.e., workers' compensation, sick leave with pay, parental leave), which runs concurrently with FMLA leave. Benefits: The employee will not accrue benefits such as sick leave or vacation while on unpaid FMLA leave. FMLA leave counts as continued service for purposes of retirement and/or pension plans. The employee may choose to continue coverage under the City's existing health care plans under the same conditions and at the same level of City contribution as would have been provided if they were not on leave. Employee contributions will be required either through payroll deduction or by direct payment to the City of Orono. The employee will be advised in writing at the beginning of the leave period as to the amount and method of payment. If an employee's contribution is more than thirty (30) days late, the City of Orono may terminate the employee's insurance coverage. Return to work: Upon return from FMLA leave, employees will be restored to their original or equivalent position with equivalent pay, benefits, and other employment terms. If, during FMLA leave, the City experiences a layoff and an employee would have lost a position had the employee not been on leave, pursuant to the good faith operation of a bona fide layoff and recall system, including a system under a collective bargaining agreement, the employee is not entitled to reinstatement in the former or comparable position. In such circumstances, the employee retains all rights under the layoff and recall system, including a system under a collective bargaining agreement, as if the employee had not taken the FMLA leave. Parenting Leave Employees who work twenty (20) hours or more per week and have been employed more than one year are entitled to take an unpaid leave of absence in connection with the birth or adoption of a child. The leave may not exceed six weeks, and must begin within six (6) weeks after the birth or adoption of the child. The employee must submit a "Request for Leave" form, copy attached, to the City at least thirty (30) days prior to taking parenting leave. FMLA, if applicable, and parenting leave run concurrently. Donating Sick Leave to Other Employees This policy governs the donation of accrued sick leave to fellow employees. The provisions of this policy are applicable to all city personnel eligible to accrue sick leave. With the approval of the city administrator, city employees having accrued sick leave are allowed to donate a portion of the accrued sick leave to fellow employees experiencing a major medical condition. A major medical condition is considered to be a severe illness, major surgery, other physical ailment or other instances that qualify under the sick leave policy that causes, oris 37 142286x12 expected to cause an absence from work for 15 working days or more in any 12 month period. Conditions The donation of sick leave from one employee to another is subject to the following_ 1. An employee must make a request to the department director or human resources to receive donated sick leave. 2. An employee is only eligible to receive donated sick leave for time lost from work due to a major medical condition as described above; 3. An employee will only be eligible to receive donated sick leave after all accrued sick leave, compensatory time and vacation have been used; 4. No emalovee will be allowed to receive more than 20 days of donated sick leave for single major medical condition without the additional approval of the city administrator; 5. An employ, emy donate no more than 16 hours per calendar year to a single fellow employee. This will not prohibit donating up to 16 hours each per year to additional fellow employees; 6. Donation of sick leave will not be allowed once an employeeludged to be disabled by the major medical condition and will not be returning to work; 7. Donation of sick leave by city employees will be completely voluntary. No city employ may pressure or otherwise attempt to influence a city employee to donate sick leave; 8. An application to donate sick leave must be made to the city administrator's office on forms designated for that purpose. 9. The city administrator shall have the right to deny use of donated sick leave or limit its use when determined as necessary and in the best interest of the City of Orono. 38 142286x12 I V 38 142286x12 Funeral Leave All full-time regular employees will be granted, if requested, up to three (3) days funeral leave for a death in the employee's immediate family. "Immediate family" means mother, father, spouse, son, daughter, aunt, uncle, niece, nephew, step -child, brother, sister, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, mother-in-law, father-in-law, grandparents and grandchild of the employee or the employee's spouse. The City Administrator may authorize more than three (3) days of paid funeral leave, in which case the additional days would be deducted from sick leave. An employee must complete a "Request for Leave" form, copy attached, to take funeral leave under this section. For attendance at the funeral of a former employee, current employee, police officer on another department killed in the line of duty, spouse of an employee, parent of an employee and Council Member, the employee will receive regular pay for time at the funeral. Jury Duty Any employee called upon to serve as a juror in a federal or state court will be granted a leave of absence by the employer for that purpose and for those days the employee is required to be in court. The employee will receive all pay and other benefits that would have accrued had the employee been performing services for the employer during the period of absence for jury duty, 39 142286x12 .. . rZIr _ .retisr.�:�srarir:�esrEye:rrr.E ........... &Wg-..-Y=AM Funeral Leave All full-time regular employees will be granted, if requested, up to three (3) days funeral leave for a death in the employee's immediate family. "Immediate family" means mother, father, spouse, son, daughter, aunt, uncle, niece, nephew, step -child, brother, sister, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, mother-in-law, father-in-law, grandparents and grandchild of the employee or the employee's spouse. The City Administrator may authorize more than three (3) days of paid funeral leave, in which case the additional days would be deducted from sick leave. An employee must complete a "Request for Leave" form, copy attached, to take funeral leave under this section. For attendance at the funeral of a former employee, current employee, police officer on another department killed in the line of duty, spouse of an employee, parent of an employee and Council Member, the employee will receive regular pay for time at the funeral. Jury Duty Any employee called upon to serve as a juror in a federal or state court will be granted a leave of absence by the employer for that purpose and for those days the employee is required to be in court. The employee will receive all pay and other benefits that would have accrued had the employee been performing services for the employer during the period of absence for jury duty, 39 142286x12 less all per diem allowances and any other compensation received for such duty. All fees paid to the employee for such appearances, except reimbursement for parking, mileage, and meal allowance, if any, must be remitted to the City. Time spent on jury duty shall not be counted as time worked in computing overtime. The employee must notify the employee's immediate supervisor and complete a "Request for Leave" form, copy attached, within 48 hours of receiving the call for court services. Employees excused or released from jury duty during their regular working hours must report to their supervisor immediately thereafter. When a City employee is subpoenaed to appear in court on a case to which the City is not a party, the City will pay the employee's regular pay, less the amount of witness pay the employee receives from the court, for a period up to ten (10) working days. Military Leave Active Duty Leave State and federal laws provide protections and benefits to City employees who are called to military service, whether in the reserves or on active duty. Such employees are entitled to a leave of absence without loss of pay, seniority status, efficiency rating, or benefits for the time the employee is engaged in training or active service not exceeding a total of fifteen (15) days in any calendar year. The leave of absence is only in the event the employee returns to employment with the City as required upon being relieved from service, or is prevented from returning by physical or mental disability or other cause not the fault of the employee, or is required by the proper authority to continue in military or naval service beyond the fifteen (15) day paid leave of absence. Employees on extended unpaid military leave will receive fifteen (15) days paid leave of absence in each calendar year, not to exceed five years. Where possible, notice is to be provided to the City at least ten (10) working days in advance of the requested leave by completing a "Request for Leave" form, copy attached. If an employee has not yet used his/her fifteen (15) days of paid leave when called to active duty, any unused paid time will be allowed for the active duty time, prior to the unpaid leave of absence. Employees returning from military service will be reemployed in the job that they would have attained had they not been absent for military service and with the same seniority, status and pay, as well as other rights and benefits determined by seniority. Unpaid military leave will be considered hours worked for the purpose of vacation leave and sick leave accruals. Eligibility for continuation of insurance coverage for employees on military leave beyond fifteen (15) days will follow the same procedures as for any employee on an unpaid leave of absence. Military Ceremonies 40 142286x12 Unless the leave would unduly disrupt the operations of the City, the City shall grant a leave of absence without pay to an employee whose immediate family member, as a member of the United States armed forces, has been ordered into active service in support of a war or other national emergency. "Immediate family member" means the employee's grandparent, parent, legal guardian, sibling, child, grandchild, spouse, fiance, or fianc6e. The amount of leave provided under this section is limited to the actual time necessary for the employee to attend a send-off or homecoming ceremony for the mobilized service member, not to exceed one (1) day's duration in any calendar year. Where possible, notice is to be provided to the City at least ten (10) working days in advance of the requested leave by completing a "Request for Leave" form, copy attached. An eligible employee may also take unpaid FMLA leave under the Military Family Leave, Qualifying Exigency section of this handbook arising out of the fact that the employee's spouse, son, daughter, or parent is on active duty in the Armed Forces in support of a contingency operation. Military Funeral Leave The City shall grant up to ten (10) working days of a leave of absence without pay to an employee whose immediate family member, as a member of the United States armed forces, has been killed while engaged in active service. "Immediate family member" means the employee's parent, child, grandparents, siblings or spouse. An employee must give as much notice as practicable of the employee's intent to exercise this leave and complete a "Request for Leave" form, copy attached. The length of leave provided under this section may be reduced by any period of paid leave provided by the City. An eligible employee may also take unpaid FMLA leave under the Military Family Leave, Qualifying Exigency section of this handbook arising out of the fact that the employee's spouse, son, daughter, or parent is on active duty in the Armed Forces in support of a contingency operation. School Conference and Activities Leave An employee will be granted up to a total of 16 hours during any school year to attend school conferences or school -related activities related to the employee's child, in the manner provided for in Minn. Stat. § 181.9412, subject to the following requirements: a. The employee must work an average of twenty or more hours per week. b. The conference or school -related activities cannot be scheduled during non -work hours. For the purpose of such leave, a "child" means an individual under eighteen (18) years of age or an individual under age twenty (20) who is still attending secondary school. When such leave cannot be scheduled during non -work hours and the need for the leave is foreseeable, the employee must provide reasonable prior notice of such leave to the City and make a reasonable 41 142286x12 effort to schedule the leave so as to not disrupt unduly the operations of the City. The employee must submit a "Request for Leave" form, copy attached, to his or her supervisor. Such leave may be either unpaid or an employee may substitute any accrued paid vacation leave or other appropriate paid leave for any part of such leave. Voting Leave Every employee who is entitled to vote at any statewide election or any election to fill a vacancy in the office of Representative in Congress will be allowed time off to vote during the morning of election day without penalty or deduction from the employee's salary or wage on account of such absence. Arrangements must be made with the employee's supervisor at least twenty-four (24) hours prior to this requested leave. Completion of a Request for Leave form in this instance is not necessary. Bone Marrow Donation Leave An employee who seeks to undergo a medical procedure to donate bone marrow will be given paid leaves of absence. For purposes of such leave "employee" means a person who works for the City an average of twenty (20) or more hours per week. The employee will be paid at his or her regular pay rate and is not required to use sick leave or vacation leave. The combined length of the leaves shall be determined by the employee, but may not exceed forty (40) work hours, unless agreed to by the City. The City requires the employee provide verification by a physician of the purpose and length of each leave requested by the employee to donate bone marrow. If there is a medical determination that the employee does not qualify as a bone marrow donor, the paid leave of absence granted to the employee prior to that medical determination is not forfeited. To request bone marrow donation leave, an employee must submit a "Request for Leave" form, copy attached. Whenever possible, an employee is required to give as much notice as possible of the pending need for a leave of absence. Organ Donation Leave The City shall grant to employees paid leave in order to donate an organ or partial organ. For purposes of this section, an employee is defined as working an average of twenty (20) hours per week. The employee will be paid at his or her regular pay rate and is not required to use sick leave or vacation leave. The leave may not exceed forty (40) hours for each donation, unless agree to by the City. The City requires verification by a physician of the purpose and length of the requested leave. To request organ donation leave, an employee must submit a "Request for Leave" form, copy attached. Whenever possible, an employee is required to give as much notice as possible of the pending need for a leave of absence. 42 142286x12 RETIREMENT PROGRAMS Severance Pay at Retirement / Termination of Employment in Good Standing / Sick Pay Handling at Termination Employees leaving the City in good standing by either retirement or resignation will receive 100% of their accrued vacation leave. Each employee with at least three (3) years, but less than twelve (12) years, of full time service will receive, upon honorable termination of employment, one-third (1/3) of the employee's accumulated sick leave as severance pay. Each employee with twelve (12) years or more of service will receive, upon honorable termination of employment, one-half (1/2) of the employee's accumulated sick leave as severance pay. Applicable taxes will be withheld from the payments. Pay will be computed at the compensation level effective at the time of retirement or resignation. Public Employees Retirement Association The Minnesota Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) is a self-insured service organization which provides annuities, survivor benefits, and total and permanent disability benefits to qualified public employees and their beneficiaries throughout the state. Eligible City employees, other than the City Administrator, must participate in PERA. The City Administrator may or may not participate in PERA depending upon the mutual agreement of the City Council and the City Administrator. Under this plan, employees contribute a prescribed percent of their salary and the City contributes a prescribed amount as a percentage of the employee's salary. Employees may withdraw from their PERA account upon leaving public employment upon request. Any employee having questions with regard to PERA benefits and regulations can contact PERA, 514 St. Peter Street, Room 200, St. Paul, Minnesota 55102, telephone number: 651-296-7460. Continuation of Group Health and Dental Insurance This policy applies to all City employees who retire on or after January 1, 1993, and participated in the City's group health and dental insurance program and met the requirements necessary to receive a disability benefit or an annuity from a Minnesota public pension plan other than a volunteer fire fighter plan. Minnesota law, Minn. Stat. Chapter 43A, provides that upon retirement, an eligible City employee and his or her covered dependents can participate in the group health/dental insurance program at the same premium rate as active employees until age 65. Retirees who have continuously participated in the group insurance program since leaving employment and retirees who are currently continuing coverage through COBRA (Consolidation Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act) can participate at the same premium rate as active employees until age 65. 43 142286x12 Coverages and levels of benefits provided to retirees under age 65 and their dependents must be identical to that provided for active employees and their dependents. Retirees age 65 and over may stay in the group indefinitely, but premium rates do not have to be pooled with the active employee rates and retiree coverage does not have to be identical to active coverage. The retiree must pay the entire premium. Spouse and/or dependent coverage can be continued after retirement only if the employee carried dependent coverage prior to retirement. Employees are not required to continue spouse and/or dependent coverage after retirement. Post Retirement Health Care Savings Plan Employees are eligible to participate in the Minnesota Post Employment Health Care Savings Plan (HCSP) established under Minn. Stat. § 352.98 and as outlined in the Minnesota State Retirement System's Trust and Plan Documents. All funds collected by the employer on the behalf of the employee will be deposited into the employee's post employment health care savings plan account. Contributions shall be made as follows: Employeeyroll Contribution Employees with 0-5 years of service will contribute 0% of pay. Employees with 6-10 years of service will contribute 1% of pay. Employees with 11-15 years of service will contribute 1% of pay. Employees with 16-20 years of service will contribute 1% of pay. Employees with 21+ years of service will contribute 1% of pay. Severance Contribution Employees with 0-5 years of service will contribute 0% of pay. Employees with 6-10 years of service will contribute 100% of pay. Employees with 11-15 years of service will contribute 100% of pay. Employees with 16-20 years of service will contribute 100% of pay. Employees with 21+ years of service will contribute 100% of pay. 44 142286x12 ACKNOWLEDGMENT By signing below I acknowledge that I have read, understand and accept the policies and procedures outlined in this employee handbook. I understand that the handbook is intended only as a general reference, and not as a full statement of the City's policies and procedure. I agree to comply with the guidelines and policies set forth in this handbook and any other guidelines or policies established by the City during my employment. In addition, I understand that the handbook does not constitute a contract of employment and that the City may change, revoke, interpret or add to any of the policies or guidelines described in the handbook at any time and in its sole discretion with or without prior notice. I agree to keep this book in my possession during my employment and to update it whenever provided with materials to do so. I further understand that each handbook is the property of the City of Orono. I agree to return this handbook upon termination of my employment. Date: Print Employee Name Please return this form to 45 142286x12 Employee Signature 142286v12 CITY OF ORONO REQUEST FOR LEAVE Request is hereby made for the following leave: With Pay _ Vacation Sick Jury Duty Parenting* School Conference/Activities Sick Child Care Military (Explain) Organ Donation/Bone Marrow (Explain) Other (Explain) Dates of Leave Employee's Signature Without Pay Funeral From Through Date * Do not complete this form to take Family and Medical Leave. LEAVE RECORD: APPROVED BY: Vac. Sick Comp. Accrued Leave: Leave Requested: Balance: 47 142286x12 Department Head Date Accounting Date CITY OF ORONO AUTHORIZATION - DONATION OF MEDICAL LEAVE I, , hereby request and authorize the City of Orono to transfer hours of my accumulated sick leave to of the Signature Title Dated: APPROVAL: Signature Title Dated: Department. 48 142286x12 Employee Name Department Hire Date CITY OF ORONO REQUEST FOR FAMILY/MEDICAL LEAVE Date of Request Position Title I request a Family/Medical Leave for the following reason (check one): A. The birth of a child in order to care for such child or the placement of a child for adoption or foster care. B. In order to care for an immediate family member if such family member has a serious health condition. Circle one: CHILD - SPOUSE - PARENT. (Must submit "Certification of Health Care Provider for Family Member's Serious Health Condition" within 15 days). C. Employee's own serious health condition that makes the employee unable to perform the functions of his/her position. (Must submit "Certification of Health Care Provider for Employee's Serious Health Condition" within 15 days.) Method of Leave Requested A. Consecutive Leave B. Intermittent or Reduced Leave Schedule (specify schedule below): Date Leave is to Begin Expected Duration of Leave If the duration of my family/medical leave (total of paid and unpaid time) does not exceed 12 weeks, I will be returned to my same or equivalent position. I understand that if my family/medical leave should exceed 12 weeks I will be returned to my same or similar position, only if available, in accordance with applicable laws. If my same or similar position is not available, I understand that I may be terminated. Employee Signature Date Supervisor Signature of Approval Date 49 142286x12 FEDERAL FMLA FORMS The following forms are available from the City Administrator: • "Certification of Health Care Provider for Employee's Serious Health Condition" • 'Certification of Health Care Provider for Family Member's Serious Health Condition" • "Certification of Qualifying Exigency for Military Family Leave" • 'Certification for Serious Injury or Illness of Covered Servicemember" 50 142286x12 AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 20 Date: December 10, 2018 Item Description: Accept Resignation of Officer Amy Swanson Presenter: Correy Farniok Agenda Section: Consent Agenda Police Chief Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to gain approval accepting Officer Amy Swanson's letter of resignation. Background. Amy Swanson was hired as a police officer by the City of Orono on January 1, 2013. Swanson also was a police officer with the Mound Police Department since May 1, 1991. Amy performed her duties as a patrol officer and investigator. On November 19, 2018, Police Officer Amy Swanson submitted a letter of resignation to the Orono Police Department. Amy's last day is December 30, 2018. The police department wishes Amy Swanson the best of luck in all of his future endeavors and for her service to the citizens of Orono, Mound, Spring Park and Minnetonka Beach. Staff Recommendation. I recommend accepting the resignation of Amy Swanson effective December 30, 2018 COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the resignation of Amy Swanson effective December 30, 2018. Prepared By: Correy Farniok Reviewed By: -Sb)R Approved By: -TV AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 21 Date: December 10, 2018 Item Description: Request to Hire Full -Time Police Officer Presenter: Correy Farniok Agenda Section: Consent Agenda Police Chief 1. Purpose. The purpose of this action item is to gain approval to hire a full-time police officer. An opening exists for a full-time police officer with Officer Amy Swanson's resignation effective December 30, 2018. 2. Background. Troy Carlson is currently employed as a police officer with Deephaven Police Department. Carlson has worked for Deephaven Police Department since 2015. Carlson also worked for the Carver County Sheriff's Office from May 2006 through September 2015. Carlson has an Associates Degree from Minneapolis Community and Technical College. Carlson is excited about the opportunity to work for the Orono Police Department. A conditional job offer has been extended to Carlson upon successful completion of a Psychological and Physical (Pre-employment medical) exam. Upon successful completion of these examinations the start date would be January 2, 2019. 3. Staff Recommendation. I recommend to hire Troy Carlson as a full-time police officer at the (after 2nd year) rate of $32.60 per hour due to his 11 years of experience with a start date of January 2, 2019. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to approve the hiring of Troy Carlson as a full-time police officer at the rate of $32.60 per hour with a start date of January 2, 2019, upon successful completion of a psychological and medical examinations. Prepared By: Correy Farniok Reviewed By: _Sb)R Approved By: -TV AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 22 Date: December 10, 2018 Item Description: LAI 8-000014 — Lakewest Development, 3570 and 3600 Ivy Place — Resolution Amendment Presenter: Jeremy Barnhart Agenda Consent Agenda Community Development Director Section: 1. Purpose. Amend resolution for Ivy Place that required each building to include a fire suppression system. 2. Background. During the review of the Ivy Place Plat, the City Council accepted the Fire Chief's recommendation that the buildings include a fire suppression system. This recommendation was incorporated in the preliminary plat resolution #6789 and by reference in the Final Plat resolution #6878 as follows: "Comments from the Fire Chief shall be addressed, including the principal structures within the Plat shall include fire suppression systems subject to the approval of the Fire Chief." The City cannot require fire suppression systems in single family homes unless stipulated by the Building Code. The amended resolution removes the requirement and restates it as a recommendation from the Fire Chief. 3. 15.99 Deadline. Not Applicable 4. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends adoption of the resolution as drafted. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to Adopt the Resolution Amending Resolution 6821 for Ivy Place Removing Fire Suppression Requirement. Exhibits A. Draft Resolution B. Letter of request C. Fire Chief Documentation D. Resolution 6878 References A. Resolution 6789 Prepared By: J. Barnhart Reviewed By: Approved By CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION 6821 FOR IVY PLACE REMOVING FIRE SUPPRESSION REQUIREMENT FILE NO. LA18-000014 WHEREAS, on July 19, 2017, Lake West Development on behalf of Rick (Barbara) Lupient ("Applicant[s] "), applied for a preliminary plat for Ivy Place. WHEREAS, on September 11, 2017 the Orono City Council approved the preliminary plat as resolution 6789 for property legally described as Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Ivy Place; and WHEREAS, on June 11, 2018, the Orono City Council approved Resolution 6878 and the Final Plat of Ivy Place, which was subject to the Conclusions, Orders, and Conditions enumerated within Preliminary Plat Resolution No 6789; and WHEREAS, on November 27, 2018, Perry Ryan, on behalf of Lake West Development, property owner, requested an amendment to Final Plat resolution 6878; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby approves the amendment to the resolution 6878 approving the Final Plat based on one or more of the following findings of fact concerning the Property: FINDINGS OF FACT: This application was reviewed as Zoning File #LA18-00014. The analysis contained within staff memos and the exhibits attached to the aforesaid memos, all minutes from the above mentioned meetings, and any and all other materials distributed at these meetings are hereby incorporated by reference. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS: 1. Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby amends the Resolution 6878 approving the Final Plat by amending the conditions as follows: CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 1. Development within IVY PLACE is subject to the Conclusions, Orders and Conditions enumerated within Preliminary Plat Resolution No 6789, and subject to the provisions of the Development Contract for IVY PLACE dated June 11, 2018. Fire suppression for principal structures is not required, but recommended by the fire chief. 2. The City Council hereby approves the vacation of easements as specified within Resolution No. 6821. 3. The approvals granted in this Resolution shall become effective only when all conditions of approval requiring actions by the Developer have been satisfied. 4. The City Clerk shall release the plat documents for filing only upon certification by the City Attorney, Community Development Director, and City Engineer that all requirements of the platting regulations have been satisfied. 5. The aforesaid plat shall be filed by the City of Orono with Hennepin County on or before December 11, 2018 together with a certified original copy of this resolution and executed copies of the easements and covenants pertinent thereto. 2. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the Applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by filing a final Plat application within one year of the date of Council approval, or the preliminary plat will expire on that date (September 11, 2018). 3. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution may result in the termination of any authority granted herein. ADOPTED by the Orono City Council on this 10th day of December, 2018. ATTEST: CITY OF ORONO: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor Jeremy Barnhart From: Perry Ryan <Perry@lwestdev.corn > Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2018 4:02 PM To: Jeremy Barnhart Cc: Curt Fretham Subject: RE: Ivy Place Attachments: Re: Casco Point & Ivy Place Jeremy, Please accept this as a formal request from Lake West Development, LLC to remove the fire suppression requirement as a Final Plat requirement. My understanding is this will be done as a change to the resolution. We have spoken with Chief James Van Eyll several times this summer and he has repeatedly said that the fire suppression is "Not a requirement, simply a suggestion". I am attaching an email from the Fire Chief on 11/13/18 in which he says regarding the fire suppression systems: "They are not required by fire code." Please let me know if you require any additional information for this request. Sincerely, Perry LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC Perry Ryan, PE Vice President — Land Development O 952.653.1359 C 952-221-3700 perry@lwestdev.com www.lakewestdeveloDment.com From: Jeremy Barnhart[mailto:jbarnhart@ci.orono.mn.usj Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 9:23 AM To: Perry Ryan <Perry@lwestdev.com> Subject: Ivy Place Perry, We will process your request to remove the fire suppression requirement as a Final Plat amendment. The City Council's options include approve, or deny the change. They can also request a recommendation from the Planning Commission. Please provide a letter of request, and the Fire Chiefs comments that the fire suppression system should not be required, and I will work to put this in front of the Council for their December 10th meeting. Jeremy Barnhart, AICP Community Development Director Direct 952.249.4626 Planning & Zoning Office 952.249.4620 2750 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 Website: www.ci.orono.mn.us Jeremy Barnhart From: James Van Eyll <jvaneylI@longlakemn.gov> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2018 11:54 AM To: Jake Wille Cc: Perry Ryan; Curt Fretham; David Bieker; Roger Peitso Subject: Re: Casco Point & Ivy Place Attachments: PastedGraphic-3.tiff Hi, I spoke with Roger about this discussion and the resolution will need to be changed to reflect the actual conversation surrounding the fire suppression systems. They are not required by fire code. Please contact Jeremy Barnhart with the City of Orono to discuss changing this resolution. Thanks James Van Eyll Fire Chief Long Lake Fire Department jvaneyll@longlakemn.gov t inj On Nov 12, 2018, at 1:02 PM, Jake Wille <jake@denalicustomhomes.com> wrote: I will look forward to the verdict. Thanks. Jake Wille Denali Custom Homes 763.350.4036 From: Perry Ryan <perry@lwestdev.com> Sent: Monday, November 12, 2018 12:55 PM To: Jake Wille; James Van Eyll Cc: Curt Fretham; David Bieker Subject: RE: Casco Point & Ivy Place Jake, I just got off the phone with Chief James. We discussed our previous discussions when the Chief said it was "not a requirement, just a suggestion". He said he would talk with Roger tomorrow to see what he could do and would get back to me hopefully tomorrow. The resolution DOES NOT demand sprinkler systems. It says as a condition "Comments from the Fire Chief shall be addressed, including the principal structures within the Plat shall include fire suppression systems subject to the approval of the Fire Chief". If the Fire Chief says that sprinklers are only suggestion, NOT A REQUIREMENT, then they are not required. Please hold on spending any additional money on changing the plans. Thanks! Perry <image002.png> Perry Ryan, PE Vice President — Land Development 0 952.653.1359 C 952-221-3700 perry@lwestdev.com www.lakewestdevelopment.com From: Jake Wille[mailto:jake@denalicustomhomes.com] Sent: Monday, November 12, 2018 9:20 AM To: James Van Eyll <jvaneyll@longlakemn.gov> Cc: Perry Ryan <Perry@lwestdev.com>; Curt Fretham <curtf@lwestdev.com>; David Bieker <denalihomes@hotmail.com> Subject: Re: Casco Point & Ivy Place Thanks for the reply James. I'll have the plans ammended for each Residence to include 2" line and fire suppression. Have a good morning. Jake Wille Denali Custom Homes 763.350.4036 From: James Van Eyll <jvaneyll@longlakemn.gov> Sent: Monday, November 12, 2018 9:18:21 AM To: Jake Wille Cc: perry@lwestdev.com; Curt Fretham; David Bieker Subject: Re: Casco Point & Ivy Place Hi Jake, Please refer to Roger's email. The resolution was written with this as a requirement. Thanks James Van Eyll Fire Chief Long Lake Fire Department jvaneyllnionglakemn.gov <image003.png><image004. j pg><image005. jpgxim age006.png> <image007.png> On Nov 9, 2018, at 10:58 AM, Jake Wille <jake2denalicustomhomes.com> wrote: Hi James, I am looking to build 2 houses at the Ivy Place lots down Casco Point that Lake West Development has sold. From what I know you and Perry Ryan have had earlier discussions relating to this property and I am hoping you can help direct us to an answer. You will see my earlier email to Roger at Orono. We just need clarification that the fire suppression is not a requirement. Both of the new homeowner's are aware of the suggestion and understand that it is not a requirement. Both homeowner's do not wish to have fire suppression in their homes. Please let me know if you would like to meet on site to discuss the property or if you can provide a statement of your previous conversations with Lake West development. Thanks for the help!!! Jake Wille Denali Custom Homes 18352 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 (C) 763-350-4036 (0) 952-476-2679 <rnage008Jpg> CI'T'Y OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 6 8 T 8 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE PLAN' OF IVY ]GLACE - FILE #LA18-000014 WHEREAS, the City of Orono (hereinafter the "City") is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Orono (hereinafter "City Council") has adopted subdivision and land development regulations for the orderly, economic and safe development of land within the City; and WHEREAS, on July 19, 2017 developers Lakewest Development, LLC , on behalf of owners Rick and Barbara Lupient (hereinafter the "Developers") submitted an application for approval of a Preliminary Plat for property located at the northern end of Ivy Place, a public road in the City of Orono and legally described in Exhibit A (attached); and WHEREAS, at its regular meeting on September 11, 2017 the Orono City Council granted approval for the Preliminary Plat per the findings and conditions of Resolution No. 6789; and WHEREAS, at its regular meeting on December 11, 2017 the Orono City Council granted approval for conditional use permits, variance, and easement vacations via Resolution No. 6821; and WHEREAS, on February 20, 2018 the Developer made formal application for final plat approval for the Property; and WHEREAS, the Developer has agreed to comply with all conditions of Resolution No. 6789 and 6821 and has completed or has agreed to complete all other requirements of the platting regulations of the City including: 1. Completion of all platting requirements and conditions of Preliminary Plat Resolution No. 6789. 2. Dedication on the plat of perimeter Drainage and Utility Easements as required in Resolution No. 6789. 3. Receipt of Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) permits approving the grading, stormwater management facilities, Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and erosion control plan. Page 1 of 4 CITY OF ORON O RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 6878 4. Provision to the City of a title opinion for the Property and certified copies of all recorded easements currently affecting the Property. 5. Execution of a Development Contract including provision of financial security including a Letter of Credit and escrow to ensure that all site improvements are installed and maintained to the City's specifications and satisfaction, and to establish conditions for future development of the site. 6. Payment of development fees as follows: a. Engineering Escrow: $7,500.00 b. Stormwater and Drainage Trunk Fee: $6,050.00 WHEREAS, City staff and consultants have reviewed the plans for this subdivision and hereby specify approval of each plan and identify them as part of the official record for IVY PLACE: Plat of IVY PLACE Sheet 0.0: Title Sheet Sheet 0.1: Site Survey Sheet 0.2: Final Plat Sheet 1.0: Removals (dated 2-20-2018) Sheets 2.0-2.4: Site Plans (dated 2-20-18) Sheets 3.0-3.2 Grading (dated 2-20-18) Sheets C4: Utility Plans (dated 2-20-18) Sheets C5: Detail Sheet (dated 2-20-18) Sheet C6: Tree Preservation Plan (dated 2-20-18) Sheet L1: Landscaping Plan (dated 2-20-18) Sheets SWI -1.5: SWPP Plan (dated 2-20-18) All of the above noted plans are subject to any additional requirements of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and subject to any additional requirements and conditions specified by the City Engineer. NOW, 'THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that based on the findings of Resolution No. 6789, the City Council of the City of Orono does hereby approve the plat of IVY PLACE, Hennepin County, Minnesota (a copy of which is attached as Exhibit B) subject to the following conditions: Page 2 of 4 CITY OF ORON O RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 6 8 7 8 1. Development within IVY PLACE is subject to the Conclusions, Orders and Conditions enumerated within Preliminary Plat Resolution No 6789, and subject to the provisions of the Development Contract for IVY PLACE dated June 11, 2018. 2. The City Council hereby approves the vacation of easements as specified within Resolution No. 6821. 3. The approvals granted in this Resolution shall become effective only when all conditions of approval requiring actions by the Developer have been satisfied. 4. The City Clerk shall release the plat documents for filing only upon certification by the City Attorney, Community Development Director, and City Engineer that all requirements of the platting regulations have been satisfied. 5. The aforesaid plat shall be filed by the City of Orono with Hennepin County on or before December 11, 2018 together with a certified original copy of this resolution and executed copies of the easements and covenants pertinent thereto. The approval granted by this Resolution shall expire if the conditions of this Resolution have not been met or the plat has not been filed by the date specified above. In that event, it will be necessary to file a new application with the City of Orono for subdivision review. Adopted by the City Council of Orono this 11"' day of June, 2018. ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor Page 3 of 4 Lots 1, 2, and 3, Block 1, Casco Point Addition CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 6878 Exhibit A Page 4 of 4 Reso0utiofln Exhibit H Nil om Hfl- In =2s@� Z 1-ik °m �"n$a ii A Aom m . �, G p$ m $zg� m li!- m mgr" m N DS m Who m m m€ z ,ni a z z�m p m; 5 O O F 2 Z n A 1 ! o €aaaa cn 19 b o pmt f 2 R g 3 m A O � D °°IIIIIII _ — D ��Rilllll� �3 � rn H $wz z z on m �ab � y m r c d x _ n in i. iyyoN�b eUiN.»coN CoA O <i Yi if �m<cwGlwwmwm m� MOM aa-�"s�mm s a�s�aats m �i '"oPosz`on naSw<mw-i�� Oo9oiiSZzZ mzzZao5N;B 01 .12 g O zz co S oo �i$yy pi gig . 0o y o$ w o m foo of g az om z 8 m� y x o0 s zo z PRo�ECi o IVY PLACE mMin i wo i 7 gPIK K;[o � 3600 IVY PLACE, ORONO, MN 55391 m m mF LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC,°rt 0 ti 14525 HIGHWAY 7, SUITE #265, MINNETONKA, MN 55345 ni 7rD . . ....... I 1z az> 0 A Fed M. cx 0 A Fed M. i 1 ^\ - I Sj o I e ➢ 8 �i. =3i&V , s% �' Y➢7 d Y2" � 197 gl ;- - ' rn "xsa$ a § � as � ° ➢ � 3€. in /\/ y� g C3 I3i � 9 a 2 �S £ 4 5 ➢ � F o� Im a Q O Fd � i t �eb 4^ gg g s 3 i ^\ gl ;- rn y� g C3 I3i � 9 q oj• � � i 4^ gg g s 5Y m 9 ➢+g ➢ n , Iaa 3 s 9 00 @Y YRS W ] q q,$ Y CO 4 IN 0tim Alf �b � ®m 0 c Q x�Y� E sS a• s Fq L 4� mu ? s Z D CS� R N m A T f INIn 0 all IIAA d Al F23 If m R `F G a6 IN 21 8 g� $ _ � vrsoiecr Q IVY PLACE ling 36001W PLACE, ORONO, MN 55391 • "' ° F '$gg LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC$=9'� a O Z Rag^. yb€ 14525 HIGHWAY 7, SUITE #265, MINNETONKA, MN 55345 „ /% • � �Op0006 a -.� / oma• oo \ -oa oa00000000o C� H �+ f 111 % ��•• All O /^ 1 ♦ p00�� � $� p d^ _ ti � �� � �� o•'i��Q a +♦�°'��a F ` � / � � tiy♦ \O T• 0 3 s g � IRA ° ZO ja$$8 09w- g R t o g MAN Hq 3 S n s sBc ax �u Hxmu s m gxe_a:.x� _ cp'a3 g HUAI $3 3 3 m 3 0 Hill N o a � m$ ` 9 � j albON WPM� A s4-1-41 a e a o `g�`I�i geggy $$�,S 6c. 0IG ai�R gP 8 &Cp am om a€ RROIEGT IVY PLACErri o °� sso 7C ;■ 36001W PLACE, ORONO, MN 55391 N nR >e g LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC pd$aFI °M. O 2 Rn` Li 14525 HIGHWAY 7, SUITE #265, MINNETONKA. MN 55345 --Ih �eb Co co �w I ftOIECT yy p ull IVY PLACE � a �� °wo Om z m ^ 'T o a 5 1'T72a two 1, y Z D£ p F F d 3- > 36091W PLACE, ORONO. MN 55391 m � 0 N 'm ,F L > LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC L s �w. s �, m w �' "G 14525 HIGHWAY 7, SUITE 9265, MINNETONKA. MN 55345 �� \ • \ � " Ciao �� s \ 92�A41 7 I I I m z 1m F e § 4 PNOJECT O � 0� P:n IVY PLACE '— � y^ o p c=m SgIn ��a� 38001W PLACE, ORONO, MN 55391 a � �. LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLCp0� I N m ?- R�^14525 HIGHWAY 7, SUITE #265, MINNETONKA, MN 55345 10* i \ \ a b1bb' �\ O, v 0 moo` � I I Z BSR�szgc� BA l l m > Y � _ y l Pao,E T IVY PLACE '—� fo 36001W PLACE, ORONO, MN 55391 z = ? Q gYg N a5£ nR ja$g_ LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC �_0w m ? 14525 HIGHWAY 7, SUITE #265, MINNETONKA. MN 55345 <- T Ilk Alp •,\ \\ /mss \`\ /// ,/• a�ac���a^ pZ I I I m $A 4 REJECT o m a= F $ Irl IVY PLACE C a 3600IW PLACE, ORONO, MN 55391 os irmyo.9 Z: N Z € # ;€>- LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC m y n Rn a 1152511.11 V 1, SUITE #265, MINNETONKA. 111111111 HN � � m � ��$ ��A �:���^m A=� � s� ��o��s ��€ an �_� �� ��c �:n��� � o x s• I as x � a � �m?� �� � m�= £� ��"g'� €m����m�'� ,�� g� a�� ��� $�� � � �_' ���^� z mot k� �� yy mm eras mp��g g€s z a �$� sm�m�sm g fi Hun a4ac P1 , is�"gym F g " s� f g° m g q HAM IVY PLACE ' ` • v 5 ¢g ' €� '3 3600 IVY PLACE, ORONO, MN 55391 W G7 $ Y � • - p��" Z O Z LAKEWESTDEVELOPMENT, LLC 'R L 14525 GHWAY 7, uT�65, MKtt�9N 55345 eb m O / \ ,. � r e s Y b B Y 9k p /)I 66J O @ o� ♦fir / + ' `[' Z11 IHII `4�e Ho Y M d e €:n IVY PLACE £°w. 4 s8g=C o iPl ��� Imo 3600 IW PLACE, ORONO, MN 55391 4� m� H LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC 'I - °� Z2? ' a P,� 14525 HIGHWAY 7, SUITE #285, MINNETONKA, MN 55345 c � �'� •rt N 9t k 8 a i � VIA / 88 � $N 8 Y >t 8 $ X cta61 gig E1 O $ �. ' a A ioa ggo oygy F ypAs k �,S�i p r oc 'Q sg Sc �,� F c m m 2 m 08 Qx08,: o�..^ 3 A � � AT�� L•"��,•'�'1;�3 O Fy A �`1JI zT2 2 E Yo Z•� Eg gzaz m is p 52 �n E 2c oyycT g� 1: $ i 4 s� = m o e o ° k $ s N m A m $3 g s All ismA c .. m m 152. s u b IVY PLACE a p cm 36001W PLACE, ORONO, MN 55391 ^�, o Z LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC " � � °� • v Z, 14525 HIGHWAY?, SUITE #265, MINNETONKA, MN 55345 n $r e �$ co vM co )JI �vvmm� w�xry�7� Fyyoyn �oybo�pl z��,+{i avn A 0 0 a i CHI 4i U ' In go a q1-n� R m m OR-3°� o c' is € € s 92. oma ; �o 1H =R'sR In § wig g;� ggs3gk 5 4i g mo i s m R o A a E g Sy c 5lu mZI = aHIN IVY PLACE a I en 5 °>, r - it �� ,• rry °^o: 36001W PLACE, ORONO. MN 55391 • 5� x Y �Ro&g LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLCx°�••�• HIGHWAY 7, SUITE #265, MINNETONKA. MN 55345 n �� N +.tta1 ? _i I6 umJn i ° io 6 ? Z 7 o�6�� Moil m O nm IT g g r� 29 93 a 'llZ e n�Rig D Illi.. iia l� SII. R�$8 f'P Z m � m m ° z R 0 ti- 0, N n >s m 5 O O V mo Y_ 0 3 o a $ $ o A o s4 8 'OS rg�9 m 3; �� �qOo S" aS'OSa O n4 ioe 3 3n 5 V `8 PROJECT e N Y IBM IVY PLACEHOW 3600 IVY PLACE, ORONO, MN 55391 LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC rrl y Fa• 5« r h rn 14525 HIGHWAY 7, SUITE 0265, MINNETONK,4. MN 55345 •• •• SS.sw�SS.,,,S.,:v..,as.�r.,,aa - - - -_ssse:�.,.msv..,a..vP,.• aggsaa;s------------ -9g gagg------------------g gsaaggaggr�asagaaa gaa azQ 7J � z X 0 � o '� m z 0 :v F$AnA =e�� � �bc� gy �� ssa��s;��s�£��£�sa��sa�g3�s�gsssgsaas"s�a�s��'ssasasaggsags�sag s g ac v II h �a baa 6 ................... ..`.. ..a.P6 k m a .asa m ;;; ;; a: :>;a:Daaaaaa aaa::aaaaa a 0 4 � � aHyl BB a -ECT 5 �I IVY PLACE NK ➢$_ 36001W PLACE, ORONO, MN 55391 m >Mjj 5H LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC O2 QpG 14525 HIGHWAY 7,SUITE #265, MINNETONKA, MN55345 i co i v J. !15 1ov 8II „ g�c 8F F m � F. F Z 110 It uv �5 Szem uv f g,3 pig DEmU Eg$ a ma EQE €E 0 9 N '21 w B.. r cuea f D e g a «$ 4411 411 §� y G� tn� m f�i F�F FFFFFSF �• G�� m $gig Oo EEE EEE EEEEEEE S � @@Q. WIN I � AAFA ,a�a Hkl4 . 'j. a�` PRO ECT IVY PLACE 0� �, e • y' m n " € $' 36001VY PLACE, ORONO, MN 55391 ggpA$''� • ` O $ I�F�2E 15 £ LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC r°F+• �`1 14525 HIGHWAY 7, SUITE #265. MINNETONKA, MN 55345 B.. o�g 5n8 S3$ offi r 5 ni �f , Nil le s� �♦ gy%` ,T- tib .�� rj ° f c r -i R:rfl G' m m�gmxS '� III Km gnu m ^ 8� 0 3� 3m m9a Z w�iwm imA ° 0 m� zN s�`m 2 O O 'o NH i o? mac m _r r 1 1'Ji3a gp$u. p t� fi �oai `x i L._J 6� ��".7 ��5� m app: o o °a a o �a °,E°, IVY PLACE a c o fr n��$P�pyCl� zm • 2°g4n 3600 IVY PLACE, ORONO, MN 55391 r,., F•G ./� r O o .g LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC yy�• vx �• ti n IY R'� G 14525 HIGHWAY 7, SUITE #265, MINNETONKA, MN 55345 e� �eb o V 00 Ems GH o� WE 4 s\• 1 'S z � %' r � i ei iso '4�h� ti0• SoZ ro. H 7mP QQ I& .6 9 m haw o° o d w i; NO jig z g m" oma $ n & 7 g R HS i$ Hm po 11= z 2� R^ a: R O o F ~ � Z PROJECT (�111HII WHIN = - g;gym IVY PLACEqp c Z € a = R a ,meg ga1 36001W PLACE, ORONO, MN 55391 ,'�O�0O5 € Z m R$� LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC Ix;rt Am O - 14525 HIGHWAY 7, SUITE #265, MINNETONKA. MN 55345 -1 |2-- i !2- i|) § - lm w � @^| |;|§ §{\{\\. ; § !�||! | | § t|§§ � : ^ \\\ � §//§ ( ; | !• / R § | fflk t!,! |W PLACE E a ) 'o N&ImKodo mp_wme_m _ 1 § q■ ƒ ® R w WEST v v PME� ,� & c � §� ` | 14525 HIGHWAY 7, SUITE #265, MINNETONKA, MN 55345 a% co --J co � g §{\{\\. ; § !�||! | � §!& #! � ■;i/|!! ( ; | !• |�] !;! Uzi U | || fflk t!,! |W PLACE E a ) 'o N&ImKodo mp_wme_m _ 1 § q■ ƒ ® R w WEST v v PME� ,� & c � §� ` | 14525 HIGHWAY 7, SUITE #265, MINNETONKA, MN 55345 a% co --J co o�gaa s : H 4 5j$Ej j p Exit I i xxF '".� g��� ga§GF�� iz o$ gs s s gg€ p�yyy��� ��m��A 5 $Ames:_g:6 �F 1a 4, P$s S c�a 00 I �R 3 m IN; s a � � �e�$ �.A"s 's �g�G g �Ao� � �d�� 1 a „ zL '€d s m m, Ap Am 3a m am y €$ ohm y ggg;k;a zl^P N aqp� s SEE "% .,..� t➢ gsop 1 gz: €� zz aR "sp a x HAM oz I R 2 n n 'fig IVY PLACE C ° I w a.°► -5 3600 IVY PLACE, ORONO, MN 55391 f= =�9 LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC ga�cFr. 14625 HIGHWAY 7. SUITE #265, MINNETONKA. MN 55345 n deb > 1113 ag 0 114 > qf 09 it it 91 If Hii- kAl o,ECT IVY PLACE 3600 IVY PLACE, ORONO, MN 55391 11 rry 4f !! f LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC 9 p LR 14525 HIGHWAY 7, SUITE #265, MINNETONKA, MN 55345 n 0--� co Dy z f 0 Z� 0 0 fif m -TT 10 3 —po '—p eb I lb 3. o- 3-1 I I ifD CI c) > .1 T F 91 i I €, I i I 1 11 i z 7 1 z > z Ii o i it -2 j i `=£1i i F, i4i;iic, j F 3 i I. iI z i j i 'z I o z f.?l > r z Mk IT a e—t z IVY PLACE cn wo H, 36001W PLACE, ORONO, IVIN 55391 0 *=Zs 2E LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT, LLC cil Hl.l..Y 1WffE �.I, , MINNETONKAN 11341 Z9 . 49 !1" eD AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 23 Date: December 10, 2018 Item Description: LAI 8-000057 — City of Orono Text Amendment: Accessory Buildings & Structures Setbacks — Ordinance & Summary Ordinance Presenter: Melanie Curtis Agenda Consent Agenda Planner Section: 1. Purpose. To adopt an ordinance and summary ordinance regarding changes to Accessory Building and Structure setbacks. Background/ Summary. The City Council reviewed the proposed amendments at the November 13th meeting. The amendments were discussed and approved overall. The code has been reorganized so that a user can find the majority of the information regarding principal building, accessory buildings, and accessory structure setbacks within the specific zoning district sections. Additional modifications were made in the Accessory Buildings and Structures, and Nonencroachment sections. At the November 13th meeting, Staff requested direction from the Council regarding the final and summary ordinances. Council voted 4 to 0 directing staff to conduct a final review of the text and prepare ordinances for consideration at the December 10' meeting. 2. Planning Commission Vote and Comment. In June, the Planning Commission opened a discussion and the public hearing for this text amendment. It was discussed and the public hearing was continued at each of the subsequent Planning Commission meetings. At the October meeting the Commission reviewed and discussed the draft ordinance provided by Staff. The Planning Commission voted 7 to 0 on a motion to approved the proposed ordinance 3. Public Comment. To date no comments from the public have been received. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED. Council should consider adopting or amending the draft Ordinance and Summary Ordinance; two separate motions are requested. Exhibits A. Draft Ordinance B. Draft Summary Ordinance References Council Staff Report and Exhibits 11/13/18 PC Staff Reports and Exhibits from the following meetings: • June 18, 2018 • July 16, 2018 • August 20, 2018 • September 17, 2018 • October 15, 2018 Prepared By: YY1GG Reviewed By: J. Barnhart Approved By: -Sb)X ORDINANCE NO. , THIRD SERIES CITY OF ORONO HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES PERTAINING TO ACCESSORY STRUCTURES AND BUILDNGS THE CITY COUNCIL OF ORONO ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Section 78-1 Definitions shall be amended by adding and deleting text to read as follows: Sec. 78-1. - Definitions. The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this chapter, shall have the meanings ascribed to them in this section, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning. Unless specifically defined in this section, the words and phrases used in this chapter shall have the meanings given to them in chapter 82. Accessory use, building, or structure means a use, building, or structure subordinate to and serving the principal use or sty WGt ;re building on the same lot and customarily incidental to the principal use or stn�,UGtUre building. Garage, private, means a detached accessory building or portion of the principal building, including a carport, which is used primariljF for storing passenger vehicles, and trailers or one trite of a rater) Gapanity of net mere than 1.5 tens SECTION 2. Section 78-229. - Accessory uses shall be amended to read as follows: Within any R -1A one -family residential district, the only permitted accessory uses and structures are the following: (4) height requirements of this nhanter. This section purposely left blank. SECTION 3. Section 78-230 -Area, height, lot width, and yard requirements shall be amended by adding and deleting text to read as follows: Sec. 78-230. — R -1A District. Area, height, lot width, setback, and yard requirements. (a) Height. Ne StrUGtUre ef building an the R 11A d'StriGt shall eXGeed 30 feet in height eXGe" M mss. The following minimum requirements shall be observed Page 1 of 22 Dimensional Lot Area Lot Width Height Requirements (Minimum) (Minimum) 140 feet Maximum 30 feet defined height; accessory 1.0 acre buildings may not exceed height of principal building Setbacks: Street/ Interior Side Rear (feet) OHWL Wetland Front Side (feet) Street feet feet feet feet Principal 35 10 35 30 na 25 or MCWD aqktg I buffer Accessory 35 10 35 10 na 25 or MCWD Building (AB) buffer <1,000 sf Oversize 35 10 35 30 na 25 or MCWD Accessory buffer Buildin >1,000 sf LAB Accessory 17.5 10 17.5 10 na 25 or MCWD Structures buffer AS (b) Exceptions: 1) Side Yard Setback. For lots that are non -conforming as to their width, the interior side yard setback for the principal building, and accessory buildings less than 1,000 square feet, shall be the lessor of ten feet or equal to ten percent of the lot width as defined. However, in no case shall the side yard setback be less than 7.5 feet. 2) Side Yards adjacent to unimproved rights-of-way. In any residential district, the setback for side yards adjacent to unimproved rights-of-way shall be the same as the applicable interior side yard setback. Unimproved in this section shall be interpreted to mean not improved or maintained by the city or county for vehicular travel. 3) Front Yard Setback. For lots that are non-conformina with resaect to area the minimum front yard setback for the principal building, and accessory buildings less than 1,000 square feet, shall be equal to the average depth of the existing front yards on the adjacent lots on each side of the non -conforming lot fronting on the same street. However, the depth of such front vard shall not be less than ten feet. SECTION 4. Section 78-254. - Accessory uses shall be amended to read as follows: Within any R-1 B one -family residential district, the only permitted accessory uses and structures are the following: (4) height regi iiremento of thio nhapter. This section purposely left blank. SECTION 5. Section 78-255. — Area, height, lot width, and yard requirements shall be amended by adding and deleting text to read as follows: Sec. 78-255. — R-1 B District. Area, height, lot width, setback, and yard requirements. Page 2 of 22 {-h) Lets. The following minimum requirements shall be observed: Dimensional Requirements Lot Area (Minimum) Lot Width (Minimum) 100 feet Height Maximum 30 feet defined height; accessory buildings may not exceed height of principal building 0.5 acre Setbacks: Street/ Front ff99_!1 Interior Side (feet) Side Street feet Rear (feet) OHWL feet Wetland feet Principal aqktg. 30 10 15 30 na 25 or MCWD buffer Accessory Building (AB) 30 10 15 10 na 25 or MCWD buffer <1,000 sf Oversize Accessory Building >1,000 sf OAB 30 10 15 30 na 25 or MCWD buffer Accessory Structures AS 15 10 7_5 10 na 25 or MCWD buffer (b) Exceptions: 1) Side Yard Setback. For lots that are non -conforming as to their width, the interior side yard setback for the principal building, and accessory buildings less than 1,000 square feet, shall be the lessor of ten feet or equal to ten percent of the lot width as defined. However, in no case shall the side yard setback be less than 7.5 feet. 2) Side Yards adjacent to unimproved rights-of-way. In any residential district, the setback for side yards adjacent to unimproved rights-of-way shall be the same as the applicable interior side yard setback. Unimproved in this section shall be interpreted to mean not improved or maintained by the city or county for vehicular travel. 3) Front Yard Setback. For lots that are non-conformina with respect to area the minimum front yard setback for the principal building, and accessory buildings less than 1,000 square feet, shall be equal to the average depth of the existing front yards on the adjacent lots on each side of the non -conforming lot fronting on the same street. However, the depth of such front yard shall not be less than ten feet. SECTION 6. Section 78-304. - Accessory uses shall be amended to read as follows: Within any LR -1A one -family lakeshore residential district, the only permitted accessory uses and structures are the following: (4) height regWiremento Of thio nhapter. This section purposely left blank. SECTION 7. Section 78-305. —Area, height, lot width, and yard requirements shall be amended by adding and deleting text to read as follows: Sec. 78-305. — LR -1A District. Area, height, lot width, setbacks, and yard requirements. Page 3 of 22 VM is. The following minimum requirements shall be observed: Dimensional Requirements Lot Area (Minimum) Lot Width (Minimum) 200 feet Height Maximum 30 feet defined height; accessory 2.0 acre buildings may not exceed height of principal building Setbacks: Street/ Front feet Interior Side (feet) Side Street feet Rear/ Street feet OHWL* Wetland feet feet Principal Building 50 30 30 50 75/100/ 25 or MCWD buffer 150+ ALS Accessory Buildin <1,000 sf 50 15 30 15 75/100/ 25 or MCWD buffer 150+ ALS Oversize Accessory Buildin >1,000 sf LAB 50 30 30 50 75/100/ 25 or MCWD buffer 150+ ALS Accessory Structures AS 25 15 15 15 75/100/ 25 or MCWD buffer 150+ ALS *OHWL setback is determined bV the classification of the lake as defined in Section 78-1217 and the applied minimum setback from the OHWL as outlined in Section 78-1279. (G -b) Exceptions: 1) Side Yard Setback. For lots that are non -conforming as to their width, the interior side yard setback for the principal building, and accessory buildings less than 1,000 square feet, shall be the lessor of ten feet or equal to ten percent of the lot width as defined. However, in no case shall the side yard setback be less than 10 feet. 2) Side Yards adjacent to unimproved rights-of-way. In any residential district, the setback for side yards adjacent to unimproved rights-of-way shall be the same as the applicable interior side yard setback. Unimproved in this section shall be interpreted to mean not improved or maintained by the city or county for vehicular travel. 3) Front Yard Setback. For lots that are non-conformina with respect to area the minimum front yard setback for the principal building, and accessory buildings less than 1,000 square feet, shall be equal to the average depth of the existing front yards on the adjacent lots on each side of the non -conforming lot fronting on the same street. However, the depth of such front yard shall not be less than ten feet. SECTION 8. Section 78-329. - Accessory uses shall be amended to read as follows: Within any LR -1 B one -family lakeshore residential district, the only permitted accessory uses and structures are the following: (4) height requirements of this Ghapter. This section purposely left blank. SECTION 9. Section 78-330. — Area, height, lot width, and yard requirements shall be amended by adding and deleting text to read as follows: Page 4 of 22 Sec. 78-330. — LR -1 B District. Area, height, lot width, setback, and yard requirements. ko Lets The following minimum requirements shall be observed: Dimensional Requirements Lot Area (Minimum) Lot Width (Minimum) 140 feet Height Maximum 30 feet defined height; accessory buildings may not exceed height of principal building 1.0 acre Setbacks: Street/ Front feet Interior Side (feet) Side Street feet Rear/ Street feet OHWL* Wetland feet IfM9 Principal Building 35 10 20 30 75/100/ 25 or MCWD buffer 150+ ALS Accessory Building <1,000 sf 35 10 20 10 75/100/ 25 or MCWD 150+ ALS buffer Oversize Accessory Building >1,000 sf OAB 35 10 20 30 75/100/ 25 or MCWD buffer 150+ ALS Accessory Structures AS 17.5 10 10 10 75/100/ 25 or MCWD buffer 150+ ALS *OHWL setback is determined by the classification of the lake as defined in Section 78-1217 and the applied minimum setback from the OHWL as outlined in Section 78-1279. (c—b) Exceptions: 1) Side Yard Setback. For lots that are non -conforming as to their width, the interior side yard setback for the principal building, and accessory buildings less than 1,000 square feet, shall be the lessor of ten feet or equal to ten percent of the lot width as defined. However, in no case shall the side yard setback be less than 7.5 feet. 2) Side Yards adjacent to unimproved rights-of-way. In any residential district, the setback for side yards adjacent to unimproved rights-of-way shall be the same as the applicable interior side yard setback. Unimproved in this section shall be interpreted to mean not improved or maintained by the city or county for vehicular travel. 3) Front Yard Setback. For lots that are non-conformina with resaect to area the minimum front yard setback for the principal building, and accessory buildings less than 1,000 square feet, shall be equal to the average depth of the existing front yards on the adjacent lots on each side of the non -conforming lot fronting on the same street. However, the depth of such front yard shall not be less than ten feet. SECTION 10. Section 78-349. - Accessory uses shall be amended to read as follows: Within any LR -1C one -family lakeshore residential district, the only permitted accessory uses and structures are the following: Page 5 of 22 (4) height regi iiremento Of thio nhapter. This section purposely left blank. SECTION 11. Section 78-350. Area, height, lot width, and yard requirements shall be amended by adding and deleting text to read as follows: Sec. 78-350. — LR -1C District. Area, height, lot width, setback, and yard requirements. nr.►s�R :r_ ¢b) Lets -The following minimum requirements shall be observed: Dimensional Requirements Lot Area (Minimum) Lot Width (Minimum) 100 feet Height Maximum 30 feet defined height; accessory buildings may not exceed height of principal building 0.5 acre Setbacks: Street/ Front feet Interior Side (feet) Side Street feet Rear/ Street feet OHWL* Wetland feet feet Principal Structure 30 10 I 15 30 75/100/ 25 or MCWD buffer 150+ ALS Accessory Building (AB) <1,000 sf 30 10 15 10 75/100/ 25 or MCWD buffer 150+ ALS Oversize Accessory Building >1,000 sf LAB 30 10 15 30 75/100/ 25 or MCWD buffer 150+ ALS Accessory Structures AS 15 10 15 10 75/100/ 25 or MCWD buffer 150+ ALS *OHWL setback is determined by the classification of the lake as defined in Section 78-1217 and the applied minimum setback from the OHWL as outlined in Section 78-1279. (c—b) Exceptions: 1) Side Yard Setback. For lots that are non -conforming as to their width, the interior side yard setback for the principal building, and accessory buildings less than 1,000 square feet, shall be the lessor of ten feet or equal to ten percent of the lot width as defined. However, in no case shall the side yard setback be less than 7.5 feet. 2) Side Yards adjacent to unimproved rights-of-way. In any residential district, the setback for side yards adjacent to unimproved rights-of-way shall be the same as the applicable interior side yard setback. Unimproved in this section shall be interpreted to mean not improved or maintained by the city or county for vehicular travel. 3) Front Yard Setback. For lots that are non-conformina with respect to area the minimum front yard setback for the principal building, and accessory buildings less than 1,000 square feet, shall be equal to the average depth of the existing front yards on the adjacent lots on each side of the non -conforming lot fronting on the same street. However, the depth of such front yard shall not be less than ten feet. SECTION 12. Section 78-368. - Accessory uses shall be amended to read as follows: Page 6 of 22 Within any LR -1C-1 one -family lakeshore residential district, the only permitted accessory uses and structures are the following: (4) height regi iiremento of thio Ghapter. This section purposely left blank. SECTION 13. Section 78-370. — Area, height, lot width, and yard requirements shall be amended by adding and deleting text to read as follows: Sec. 78-370. — LR -1C-1 District. Area, height, lot width, setback, and yard requirements. {) is The following minimum requirements shall be observed: Dimensional Requirements Lot Area (Minimum) Lot Width (Minimum) 100 feet Height Maximum 30 feet defined height; accessory buildings may not exceed height of principal building 0.5 acre Setbacks: Street/ Front feet Interior Side (feet) Side Street feet Rear/ Street feet OHWL* Wetland feet fftgil Principal Building 30 10 15 30 75/100/ 25 or MCWD buffer 150+ ALS Accessory Buildinq (AB) <1,000 sf 30 10 15 10 75/100/ 25 or MCWD buffer 150+ ALS Oversize Accessory Building >1,000 sf LAB 30 10 15 30 75/100/ 25 or MCWD buffer 150+ ALS Accessory Structures AS 15 10 15 10 75/100/ 25 or MCWD 150+ ALS buffer *OHWL setback is determined by the classification of the lake as defined in Section 78-1217 and the applied minimum setback from the OHWL as outlined in Section 78-1279. (b) Exceptions: 1) Side Yard Setback. For lots that are non -conforming as to their width, the interior side yard setback for the principal building, and accessory buildings less than 1,000 square feet, shall be the lessor of ten feet or equal to ten percent of the lot width as defined. However, in no case shall the side vard setback be less than 7.5 feet. 2) Side Yards adjacent to unimproved rights-of-way. In any residential district, the setback for side yards adjacent to unimproved rights-of-way shall be the same as the applicable interior side yard setback. Unimproved in this section shall be interpreted to mean not improved or maintained by the city or county for vehicular travel. 3) Front Yard Setback. For lots that are non-conformina with respect to area the minimum front yard setback for the principal building, and accessory buildings less than 1,000 square feet, shall be equal to the average depth of the existing front yards on the adjacent lots on each side of the non -conforming lot fronting on the same street. However, the depth of such front vard shall not be less than ten feet. Page 7 of 22 SECTION 14. Section 78-394. - Accessory uses shall be amended to read as follows: Within any RR -1A one -family rural residential district, the only permitted accessory uses and structures are the following: (4) height requirements of this r•haptor. This section purposely left blank. SECTION 15. Section 78-395. — Area, height, lot width, and yard requirements shall be amended by adding and deleting text to read as follows: Sec. 78-395. — RR -1A District. Area, height, lot width, setback, and yard requirements. (b) Lets The following minimum requirements shall be observed: Dimensional Requirements Lot Area (Minimum) Lot Width (Minimum) 300 feet Height Maximum 30 feet defined height; accessory buildings may not exceed height of principal building 5.0 acre Setbacks: Street/ Front feet Interior Side (feet) Side Street feet Rear/ Street feet OHWL* Wetland feet fftpil Principal Building 100 50 100 100 75/100/ 25 or MCWD buffer 150+ ALS Accessory Building (AB) <1,000 sf 100 20 100 20 75/100/ 25 or MCWD 150+ ALS buffer Oversize Accessory Building >1,000 sf LAB 100 50 100 100 75/100/ 25 or MCWD 150+ ALS buffer Accessory Structures 50 20 50 20 75/100/ 25 or MCWD buffer 150+ ALS *OHWL setback is determined by the classification of the lake as defined in Section 78-1217 and the aaalied minimum setback from the OHWL as outlined in Section 78-1279. (b) Exceptions: 1) Side Yards adjacent to unimproved rights-of-way. In any residential district, the setback for side yards adjacent to unimproved rights-of-way shall be the same as the applicable interior side yard setback. Unimproved in this section shall be interpreted to mean not improved or maintained by the city or county for vehicular travel. 2) Front Yard Setback. For lots that are non-conformina with respect to area the minimum front yard setback for the principal building, and accessory buildings less than 1,000 square feet, shall be equal to the average depth of the existing front yards on the adjacent lots on each side of the non -conforming lot fronting on the same street. However, the depth of such front yard shall not be less than ten feet. SECTION 16. Section 78-419. - Accessory uses shall be amended to read as follows: Page 8 of 22 Within any RR -1 B one -family rural residential district, the only permitted accessory uses and structures are the following: (4) height regi iirements of this Ghapter. This section purposely left blank. SECTION 17. Section 78-420. — Area, height, lot width, and yard requirements shall be amended by adding and deleting text to read as follows: Sec. 78-420. — RR -1 B District. Area, height, lot width, setback, and yard requirements. {) Lots. The following minimum requirements shall be observed: Dimensional Requirements Lot Area (Minimum) Lot Width (Minimum) 200 feet Height Maximum 30 feet defined height; accessory buildings may not exceed height of principal building 2.0 acre Setbacks: Street/ Front feet Interior Side (feet) Side Street feet Rear/ Street feet OHWL* Wetland feet feet Principal Building 50 30 30 50 75/100/ 25 or MCWD buffer 150+ ALS Accessory Building (AB) <1,000 sf 50 15 30 15 75/100/ 25 or MCWD buffer 150+ ALS Oversize Accessory Building >1,000 sf LAB 50 30 30 50 75/100/ 25 or MCWD buffer 150+ ALS Accessory Structures AS 25 15 15 15 75/100/ 25 or MCWD 150+ ALS buffer *OHWL setback is determined by the classification of the lake as defined in Section 78-1217 and the applied minimum setback from the OHWL as outlined in Section 78-1279. (s -b) Exceptions: 1) Side Yard Setback. For lots that are non -conforming as to their width, the interior side yard setback for the principal building, and accessory buildings less than 1,000 square feet, shall be the lessor of ten feet or equal to ten percent of the lot width as defined. However, in no case shall the side vard setback be less than 10 feet. 2) Side Yards adjacent to unimproved rights-of-way. In any residential district, the setback for side yards adjacent to unimproved rights-of-way shall be the same as the applicable interior side yard setback. Unimproved in this section shall be interpreted to mean not improved or maintained by the city or county for vehicular travel. 3) Front Yard Setback. For lots that are non-conformina with respect to area the minimum front yard setback for the principal building, and accessory buildings less than 1,000 square feet, shall be equal to the average depth of the existing front yards on the adjacent lots on each side of the non -conforming lot fronting on the same street. However, the depth of such front vard shall not be less than ten feet. Page 9 of 22 SECTION 18. Section 78-570. - Yard and setback requirements shall be amended by adding and deleting text to read as follows: Sec. 78-570. — RS District. Yard and setback requirements. Within any RS seasonal recreational district, the following yard and setback requirements shall be observed for all new buildings and structures and for any addition or alteration to any existing building or structure, whether temporary, seasonal or permanent: (1) Minimum setback from lakeshore, all buildings and structures, including decks, fences, retaining walls, wells, on-site sewage treatment systems and land alteration of any kind, 75 feet. (2) Minimum setback from wetlands shall be: a. Wells and sewage treatment systems, 75 feet. b. All buildings and structures, land alteration or hard cover of any kind, shall meet the setback requirements established within article XI of chapter 78 of this Code (the wetlands protection element of the Zoning Code). (3) Minimum setback from platted street rights-of-way, all buildings and structures, 30 feet. (4) Minimum setback from internal side or rear property line shall be: a. All buildings and structures on lots 200 feet or more in width, 50 feet. b. All buildings and structures on existing record lots 100 feet or more in width but less than 200 feet in width, 30 feet. c. All buildings and structures on existing record lots less than 100 feet in width, ten feet. (5) Minimum setback any building to any other, ten feet. SECTION 19. Section 78-1279. - Placement of structures on lots shall be amended by adding and deleting text as follows: Sec. 78-1279. - Placement of buildings and structures on lots. When more than one setback applies to a site, buildings, structures, and facilities must be located to meet all setbacks. Buildinas and sStructures shall be located as follows: (1) Building, sStructure, and on-site sewerage system setbacks (in feet) from ordinary high water level: Setbacks Sewage Public Water Building/Structure Treatment Classification Unsewered Sewered , System NE 150 150 150 Page 10 of 22 (2) Additional building and structure setbacks. The following additional etre setbacks apply, regardless of the classification of the water body: Setback from: Setback (in feet) Top of bluff 1 30 Unplatted cemetery 1 50 Right-of-way line of federal, state or county highway and local public and private 30* roads * Except for ` etaGhed garages accessory buildings on lakeshore lots as regulated in this chapter seGt'en 78 1 and except for buildings and structures subject to less restrictive side yard adjacent to street setbacks as regulated in the various zoning districts. (3) Bluff impact zones. Buildings, sStructures and accessory facilities, except stairways, landings and lock boxes, must not be placed within bluff impact zones. (4) Uses without water -oriented needs. Uses without water -oriented needs must be located on lots or parcels without public waters frontage, or, if located on lots or parcels with public waters frontage, must either be set back double the normal ordinary high water level setback or be substantially screened from view from the water by vegetation or topography, assuming summer, leaf -on conditions. (5) Fences, docks, retaining walls. No fence shall be placed within the shore setback zone. Portions of dock located landward of the OHWL shall be considered as a landing, subject to the regulations for landings per section 78-1282. Retaining walls shall not be placed within the shore setback zone. (6) Average lakeshore setback. No principal or accessory S+r���e building shall be located closer to the lakeshore than the average distance from the shoreline of existing residence buildings on adjacent lots; except that this does not apply to patios and other accessory structures less than 42 inches above existing grade, stairways, lifts, landings, lockboxes, flagpoles and pump houses. Further, the average lakeshore setback shall apply only to classified lakes and shall not apply to tributaries. The average lakeshore setback line shall be a straight line connecting the most lakeward protrusions of the residence buildings on the immediately adjacent lakeshore lots. a. In situations where improvement is proposed on a lot adjacent to a vacant lot or right-of-way, the average lake shore setback shall be equivalent to the setback of the most Iakeward protrusion of the residence building on the immediately adjacent improved lakeshore lot. Page 11 of 22 SECTION 20. Section 78-1403. - Lot coverage and massing standards shall be amended by adding and deleting text to read as follows: Sec. 78-1403. - Lot coverage and massing standards. In all zoning districts other than the I—Industrial district, all lots that have a gross acreage of less than two acres shall comply with the following massing standards for StF�, yes -buildings: (a) Maximum total footprints allowed. (1) On lots equal to or greater than 10,000 square feet in area, the total combined footprints of all principal and accessory S+r���es buildings shall not exceed 20 percent of the gross lot area. (2) On lots of less than 10,000 square feet in area, the total combined footprints of all principal and accessory StF esbuildings shall not exceed 2,000 square feet. (b) Calculation of massing. The fellewin All buildings shall be included in the calculation of the total combined footprints by GtF. +�=buildings. SECTION 21. Section 78-1404. – Tennis courts, sport courts, pools, paddocks, arenas shall be adding and deleting the text as follows: Sec. 78-1404. TenniScGUFtS, Sn^r+ GG rtom pools paddGGks arenas. This section purposely left hlank_ SECTION 22. Section 78-1405. - Nonencroachments shall be amended by adding and deleting text to read as follows: Sec. 78-1405. - Nonencroachments. (a) The following shall not be considered to be encroachments on yard setback requirements: (1) Chimneys, flues, belt courses, leaders, sills, pilasters, lintels, ornamental features, cornices, eaves, gutters, and similar building elements, provided they do not extend more than two feet into a required yard. (2) Nameplate signs for one -family dwellings subject to the provisions of article X, division 4 of this chapter; lights for illuminating parking areas, loading areas or yards for safety and security purposes, provided the direct source of light is not visible from the public right-of-way or adjacent residential property and is located at least five feet from the front lot line; public utility poles and overhead lines; mailboxes. (3) Torre sSteps, sidewalks, uncovered porches, stoops or similar structures which do not extend above the height of the ground floor level of the principal building and extend Page 12 of 22 to a distance of not less than two feet from any lot line. Winde„w wells ine+l,,Minn thE)se fear driveways and parking areas when IGGated and used on GGFnpIiaRGe to Wthin five foot of a side 1E)t lino (4) Bays, cantilevers, and fire escapes. In side or rear yards only, the following encroachments are permitted: a. bBays and/or cantilevers which are not part of the defined building footprint, may extend up to two feet into the required side or rear yard, provided the nr.r t^ Ge,ntain an aggregate area of the bays and/or cantilevers is not more than 20 square feet;; and Fire escapes not to exceedinci a width of three feet and a depth of four feet;_. afad epen eff_stFeet paFkinrr (5) -dDriveways and parking areas when constructed, located and used in compliance with other provisions contained within chapter 78. Driveways and parking areas may extend to within five feet of a side lot line. In roar yarns onl„ ba'nonies breezeways, .detonhorl outdoor PiGniG shelters, laundry drying equipment, and reGreational equipment exGept as ethepNise regulated; Re aGGessery StFLIGtLIFe shall be GIE)SeF thaR five feet from a rear lot (546) Retaining walls, planters and similar structures, subject to the following provisions: a. Retaining walls, planters and similar structures may be located in all required yards when all of the following conditions are met: The structure is located at least ten feet from the edge of the traveled roadway; 2. The structure is not located within a drainage, utility, or other easement, except upon approval in writing for an encroachment agreement by the city; or similar approval from another regulatory and/or utility agency; 3. The structure creates no impacts to drainage direction, rate or volume for adjacent properties. 4. The structure is two feet in height or less above existing grade. b. Retaining walls, planters and similar structures exceeding two feet in height above existing ground level or which are located less than five feet from a side property line, shall require a permit and upon recommendation of the building official may require city council review or a conditional use permit per the provisions of section 78-967. c. Retaining walls, planters and similar structures exceeding the allowed height of a fence shall be located so as to meet the required accessory structure setbacks established for that yard. (67) Window wells including those for fire egress which do not extend more than five feet from the building, and no closer than two feet to the property line. IR side yaFdG E)Rly, RE) ,aGGeessercn rUGture-sh-�e" be ��er than ten foot from any side Int lino arrv� �rtunz Tcc �rvrnn� (78) Air conditioning or heating equipment may be located within a required yard but shall be located within five feet of the building it serves; shall not be located within an existing or required drainage and/or utility easement; and shall be located at least five feet from any lot line. Page 13 of 22 (89) Fences erected in all zoning districts are considered as a nonencroachment when they conform to the standards listed below. For the purposes of this section, the following definitions shall apply: Permanent fence. A fence that is installed in a fixed or enduring manner that is not intended for a seasonal or temporary purpose. Temporary fence. A fence that is not permanently secured or anchored to the ground by posts or affixed footings, and is installed and removed on a limited term or seasonal basis such as: snow fences, garden fences, seasonal recreational fences such as hockey boards; fences installed for safety or access management purposes for special events; and fences installed for the duration of a construction project such as silt fences, erosion control bioretention logs, and septic drainfield site protection fences. Fence height. The measurement from the top of any part of the fence, including posts or other structural supports, lattice, ornate top design elements, and so forth measured to the existing ground level below the fence, as measured perpendicular to the slope (see Drawing). Exception: Post finials extending above the top of the fence shall not be deemed as part of the fence for height determination purposes as long as they do not exceed ten inches in width per finial and do not extend above the top of the fence by more than ten percent of the allowed maximum fence height at that location. Drawing: Fence Height Measurement on Sloped Site FENCN-GM a. Nonlakeshore lots. Fences and walls within a required front yard or side street yard shall not exceed a height of 42 inches above existing ground level . 2. Fences and walls within a required rear or side yard shall not exceed a height of six feet above existing ground level. b. Lakeshore lots. Fences within the required street (rear) yard or side street yard of a lakeshore lot shall not exceed 42 inches above existing ground level. Exception: A fence not exceeding six feet in height may be located along the street lot line of a lake frontage lot which abuts a major thoroughfare. A major thoroughfare for purposes of this section means any county road or state highway. If such fence Page 14 of 22 involves fill or berming, the total combined height of both fence and fill shall not exceed six feet above the height of the crown of the major thoroughfare. 2. Fences within the required side yard of a lakeshore lot shall not exceed six feet in height, and shall not exceed 42 inches in height for any portion located lakeward of a line drawn between the most lakeward projection of the fence owner's principal residence structure and the most lakeward projection of the principal residence structure on the adjacent property abutting the side yard in which the fence is located. 3. Fences shall not be constructed within the defined lakeshore yard of a lakeshore lot, i.e., shall not be located within 75 feet of the shoreline for general development lakes, 100 feet for recreational lakes, or 150 feet for natural environment lakes. 4. When the building site of a lakeshore lot is separated from the lakeshore by a public or private road, the following definitions will apply for fence location purposes subject to the provisions of section 78-1405(a)(8)a.2: When the yard on the opposite side of the building site from the lake does not abut a street, such yard shall be considered as a standard rear yard. The yard between the building site and the street shall be considered as a standard front yard. c. Special provisions. Split rail fences of no more than three rails within a required front, street or side street yard may have a maximum top rail height of 48 inches above existing ground level. Board rail fences within a front, street or side street yard for the specific purpose of enclosing permitted domestic animals may have a top rail height of 60 inches and shall be no more than 50 percent opaque. d. Intersection sightline obstruction prohibited. No fence shall be installed so as to obstruct a required clear view at street intersections as required by section 78-1371. e. Fence construction and maintenance. 1. The owner of a fence shall maintain it in a condition of reasonable repair and appearance and shall not allow it to become or remain in disrepair or in a dangerous condition. 2. Fences shall be installed with the finished side facing neighboring properties or the street. The term "finished side" means that side having no structural supports. 3. Fencing materials shall consist of permanent all weather products. 4. Temporary fencing shall not be allowed to remain on the property following final inspection, or issuance of a certificate of occupancy for a permitted construction project, or protection of property during a similar project or winter conditions. Winter conditions shall be defined as October 15 through March 31 of the following year. Temporary fencing associated with a special event shall be removed within seven days of the end of such event. Temporary fencing materials shall not be allowed to remain on a permanent basis on a parcel. 5. Existing fences that are legal nonconforming as to location, height, design or other characteristics may be replaced in kind. (9J 0) Entrance monuments, defined for the purpose of this section as a nearly permanent physical structure or object, natural or artificial, used to depict an entrance to the property, erected in all residential zoning districts are considered nonencroachments when they conform with the following standards: Page 15 of 22 a. Each monument, with a maximum of two per approved driveway access, shall be limited to a single pillar with a footprint measuring no larger than 25 square feet and no length to exceed five feet; b. The monument must be setback a minimum of five feet from all property boundaries and never fewer than ten feet from the edge of the paved, traveled roadway; C. Plans and/or elevation views of the proposed monuments are required to be submitted for approval by the planning director; d. All signage proposed for the monuments must comply with Article X, Division 4 GeGtiE)R 7-8 1467; e. The monuments are limited to eight feet in height including any appurtenances. Any monument exceeding the maximum height must meet principal structure setback requirements; f. When more than one monument is proposed, and serving two or fewer residences, a minimum horizontal width of 16 feet is required between them; g. When more than one monument is proposed, and serving three or more residences, a minimum horizontal width of 22 feet is required between them; h. Lighting is allowed, in conformance with section 78-1573 and at the discretion of the planning director. i. A building permit is required for installation and the property corners must be located for inspection purposes. (101) Gates, when proposed, must meet the following requirements: a. The gate must open into the property not outward towards the right-of-way, and b. Gates serving two or fewer residences shall have a minimum horizontal width of 14 feet in the full open position, and c. Gates serving three or more residences shall have a minimum horizontal width of 20 feet in the full open position, and d. For all properties, gate height may not exceed the height of the monument, measured from grade, unless principal structure setbacks are met (if monuments are not proposed then gate height shall be regulated in accordance with the fence height regulations of section 78-1405(8), and e. For locked and/or secured gates a knox box, meeting the standards set forth by the police and fire department, must be provided for emergency access, and f. On major thoroughfares the monuments and gates must be located 40 feet from the paved, traveled road to allow for vehicle stacking. A major thoroughfare for the purposes of this section means any county road or state highway. (b) The following shall not be considered to be encroachments on structure height requirements: (1) Parapet walls that extend no more than three feet above the height of the building. (2) HVAC cooling towers. (3) Elevator penthouses. SECTION 23. Section 78-1406. - Additional yard provisions shall be amended by adding and deleting text to read as follows: Page 16 of 22 Sec. 78-1406. - Additional yard provisions. Required yards in the districts specified shall be subject to the following additional requirements: (1) Through lots. Through lots in any district shall have a required front yard on each street. (2) 8 and I districts: adjacent lots. In the B and I districts, where the average depth of a of a fren+ yard shall net be loss than five feet nnr be required to ` XGeed 50 foo+ for lots that are non -conforming with respect to area, the minimum front yard setback for the principal building shall be equal to the average depth of the existing front yards on the adiacent non-residential lots on each side of the non -conforming lot fronting on the same street. However. the death of such front vard shall not be less than ten feet. SECTION 24. Section 78-1431. - Accessory buildings and structures on through lots shall be amended by adding and deleting text to read as follows: Sec. 78-1431. - Accessory buildings and structures on through lots. All accessory buildings and structures on through lots located in R districts shall meet the following requirements: (1) The building or structure shall meet the principal building setbacks that are established under sections 78-230, 78-255, 78-305, 78-330, 78-350, 78-370, 78-395, 78-420, 78- 444. (2) No negative impacts to adjacent neighbors or public right-of-way result in the placement of the building or structure, determined at the discretion of the City Administrator pIaRRiRg d+reEter. Should the City Administrator planning direGte determine that item (2) above cannot be met an accessory structure or building may be permitted by conditional use permit if the planning commission determines no negative impacts result in the placement of the building or structure. The planning commission may apply reasonable conditions as part of the approval. SECTION 25. Section 78-1432. - Time of construction shall be amended by adding and deleting text to read as follows: Sec. 78-1432. - Time of construction. Page 17 of 22 No accessory building or structure shall be constructed on any lot prior to the time of construction of the principal building to which it is accessory. At the tomo of dem„Iiti„n Of the SECTION 26. Section 78-1433. - Height Restrictions shall be amended by adding and deleting text as follows: Sec. 78-1433. - Height FeStFiGtiGRS. This section purposely left blank. SECTION 27. Section 78-1434. - Area restrictions shall be amended by adding and deleting text to read as follows: Sec. 78-1434. — AFBuilding Size Rfestrictions. In all R diStFiGtS ^No accessory building shall exceed 1,000 square feet of footprint area; except that accessory S+,-, Abuildings in excess of 1,000 square feet shall be considered oversized and will be allowed under the following conditions: Page 18 of 22 (1) Not more than one oversized accessory S+re building (9ASOAB) shall be permitted on any property. An eyemized o^^^c?OAB is defined as an accessory StFUGtUrebuilding of footprint area in excess of 1,000 square feet. (2) An OAB is regulated by the following table: Page 19 of 22 Maximum Maximum Allowed Total Individual of All Accessory Lot Area OAB Ac-cessery c+,�, UGtU e (acres) c+�,z Buildin Footprint Footprint Area Areas* on (square feet) a Property (square feet) 0-1.99 1,000 �i 2,000 2.00-3.00 � 1,200 -T 2,400 3.01-3.50 2,800 1,400 3.51-4.00 3,200 1,600 4.01-4.50 3,600 1,800 4.51-5.00 4,000 2,000 5.01-6.00 4,400 2,200 6.01-7.00 4,800 2,400 7.01-8.00 5,200 2,600 8.01-9.00 5,600 2,800 9.01 or rnore- - 10.00 6,000 3,000 10.01 - 11.00 6,400 3,200 11.01 - 12.00 3,400 6,800 12.01 - 13.00 3,600 7,000 13.01 - 14.00 � 3,800 8,000 14.01 or more 4,000 8,000 Page 19 of 22 (3) Any eyersized Geos^r„ Sfr„^f„re OAB shall be subject to the following conditions: U {pPrincipal of�, Mare building setbacks must be met). Further, no o Gh ofri Gt ire OAB shall be nearer the front lot line than the front line of the principal residenGo building on the property, and ne of Gh orGSser�i�Q re shall be IOGated loco +hors 30 foo+ �.rcrcrrac -a-rr�c-rvca-cca�c�v �riurrvvzccc frem the side er rear let '"Re regaFdless whether less StFiGt pFiRGipall sfir.--rut.-U-Ir-e setbaGks apply. b. The maximum height for such accessory ofre building shall be 30 feet or the defined height of the principal residences ire building on the property, whichever is less. C. SUGh StFUGtu An OAB shall be allowed only when the property owner agrees and covenants in writing with the city as follows: 1. No future subdivision will be approved that places the OAB within a lot that has no principal ofrUe building, except that the city in its subdivision approval may grant a finite time period in which the e oroized aGGesser„ ofrU GWre OAB may remain without a principal straetufe-building, in order that a principal building may be constructed. At the end of this time period, the aGGessery o+rU GWre OAB must be removed if no principal ofr�,-ire-building has been constructed. 2. If the property is subdivided, the oversized-aeeessary StrUGtUFe-OAB and principal o+rUe building will be located together within a lot that meets the minimum lot area requirement for the given size of the eyersoze l aGGess^r„ o+r,cOAB. 3. In subdivision approval, the setback required for the eyersize ! aGGesser,i o+rOAB shall remain. Such covenant shall be binding on current and future property owners and shall be filed in the chain of title of the property. SECTION 28. Section 78-1435. - Location shall be amended by adding and deleting text to read as follows: Sec. 78-1435.l-�atien Garages on lake lots. Accessory buildings on lake lots with garage doors facing a street shall meet the applicable principal structure setbacks for the district; Section 78-1681 Driveways, in general shall apply. Page 20 of 22 SECTION 29. Section 78-1436. - Setbacks shall be amended by adding and deleting text to read as follows: Sec. 78-1436. - co+�GkS. This section purposely left blank. SECTION 30. Section 78-1437. - Plumbing shall be amended by adding and deleting text to read as follows: Sec. 78-1437. - Plumbing. Because the provision of plumbing fixtures and wastewater plumbing in accessory buildings has the potential to allow such buildings to be used as dwelling units, and because it is the policy of the city to limit residential development density to the allowed densities within the respective zoning districts, plumbing in accessory buildings shall be regulated as follows: (1) The provision of outside sillcocks and indoor water supply shall be allowed in any accessory building that io n9nfGFMiRg in IGGation size and heigh4. (2) Installation of any combination of fixtures requiring wastewater plumbing that does not include a shower or bathtub shall be allowed in any accessory building that is Gonforming with, subject to provision of municipal sanitary sewer or a conforming sewage treatment system designed to handle the anticipated flows from such fixtures, and subject to the property owner's executing a covenant providing that the accessory building will not be: a. Used for a home occupation unless specifically approved by the city or if allowed by this Code. b. Used as a dwelling unless a guest house conditional use permit is obtained. C. Rented, leased or otherwise provided for use as a dwelling under any circumstances. (3) Installation of any combination of fixtures requiring wastewater plumbing that includes a shower or bathtub shall be allowed only in an accessory building that is n„nf„rmiRg in lecatien sone and which meets one of the following criteria: a. The accessory building has been approved for a guest house conditional use permit; or b. The accessory building has been approved for a bathtub or shower in accessory building conditional use permit. SECTION 31. Section 78-1439. - Garages shall be amended by adding and deleting text to read as follows: Sec. 78-1439. -Garages—This section purposely left blank. SECTION 32. Section 78-1440. — Exterior materials shall be amended by adding and deleting text to read as follows: Page 21 of 22 Sec. 78-1440. - Exterior materials. (a) Aany accessory building and the principal building shall be consistent in design and color. Except for accessory buildings that are less than 120 square feet in area or are located on lots two acres in area or larger. that have fFGRtage en a lake shall have windews er etheF ernarnental featuFes en the feeing a street or private road Within RR -1A and RR -1B districts, an accessory building less than 1,000 square feet may be located streetward of the principal building provided the following conditions are met: a. Principal building setbacks shall be met; and b. The accessory building shall be consistent in design, color and exterior material with the principal building. EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its passage and publication. ADOPTED this day of , 2018 on a vote of _ ayes and _ nays by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota. ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City C Dennis Walsh, Mayor Ordinance published in The Laker and The Pioneer newspapers the week of , 2018. Page 22 of 22 SUMMARY ORDINANCE NO. , THIRD SERIES CITY OF ORONO HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ORONO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE REGARDING THE REGULATIONS FOR ACCESSORY BUILDINGS AND ACCESSORY STRUCTURES NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, on , 2018, Ordinance No. , Third Series, was adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that, because of the lengthy nature of Ordinance No. Third Series, the following summary of the ordinance has been prepared for publication. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that the ordinance adopted by the Council amends Chapter 78 of the Orono City Code regarding the applicable regulations governing accessory buildings and accessory structures. This ordinance amends the Orono Code by simplifying the location of the setback regulations for accessory buildings and accessory structures within Chapter 78 and modifies some of the regulations for the same. The complete ordinance is available for inspection by any person during the City's regular office hours. APPROVED for publication by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, this _ day of , 2018. CITY OF ORONO Dennis Walsh, Mayor Anna Carlson, City Clerk Summary Ordinance published in The Laker and The Pioneer newspapers the week of 2018. AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 24 Date: December 10, 2018 Item Description: Resolution of Appreciation for Wendy Dankey Presenter: Dennis Walsh, Agenda Presentation Mayor Section: 1. Mayor Dennis Walsh will be presenting this item. A RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION TO WENDY DANKEY FOR DISTINGUISHED SERVICE AS A MEMBER OF THE ORONO CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. WHEREAS, Wendy Dankey has served this community with dedication and distinction for two years as a member of the City Council; and WHEREAS, her years of service have been marked by exemplary dedication to the best interests of the community; and WHEREAS, she has earned the admiration and high regard of those with whom she has worked; and WHEREAS, the performance of her duties and responsibilities as a member of the City Council has been characterized by excellent and constructive contributions to the community, and WHEREAS, Wendy is now retiring from her position as City Council Member. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono does hereby express its sincere appreciation and gratitude to Wendy Dankey for her distinguished service to the community and does also highly commend her for the manner in which she has carried out her duties and responsibilities. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council does hereby extend to Wendy Dankey best wishes for continued success in her future endeavors, and encourages her to remain active in the community. Adopted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 10"' day of December, 2018. ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 25 Item Description: Steve Tallen — City Prosecutor Date: December 10, 2018 Presenter: Steve Tallen, Agenda Presentation City Prosecutor Section: 1. Steve Tallen will be presenting this item. AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 26 Date: December 10, 2018 Item Description: LAI 8-000096 (685 Old Crystal Bay Road) Orono Public Schools Variance — Public Hearing Jeremy Barnhart Agenda Public Hearing Community Development Section: 1. Purpose. This item has two purposes; a. Waive Planning Commission review of a variance b. After holding the public hearing, consider a variance from the sign ordinance that would permit an electronic changeable sign larger than permitted by ordinance, replacing an existing sign. 2. Background. The Planning Commission is charged with reviewing all variance requests and providing a recommendation to the City Council. Per City Code 78-122, the Council can waive this review by unanimous vote. The Council has exercised this authority a number of times including several occasions in December, when the Planning Commission does not meet; preventing the applicant from having to wait until February for a response to their variance question. On likely non -controversial items, staff supports the waiver. If the Council supports the waiver: On March 14, 2006, via Resolution 5292, the Orono City Council approved a variance and conditional use permit for signage greater than 12 square feet, the maximum permitted in residential districts at the time. The sign, primarily an electronic reader board, was 56 square feet within a structure 11 feet by 9' 2 inches. That sign has been constructed and is in use. The CUP was required as schools were Conditional Uses at the time, they are not permitted uses. The School District now proposes replacing the electronic reader board within the existing structure. In addition, the School District proposes an arch feature above the reader board that includes the text "Orono Schools" and the school crest. This additional `signage' measures 375" by 11'5" feet. Because the sign ordinance calculates sign area based on the smallest rectangle, circle, or triangle that contains the sign copy, this new structure is an additional 41.4 gross square feet, or 124.19 sq ft total; this is based on the plans dated June 18, 2018: H(6'9" + 6" + 3'7 1/2") x W11'5", attached as Exhibit C. While freestanding signs in signage district 2 are permitted up to 32 sq ft and a maximum height of 8 feet, a variance previously approved a 9'2" structure and 56 sq ft of signage, as illustrated on the table below. Signage Allowed Variance B By (Res. Proposed District 5282) Height 8' 912" 13' Area 32 56 124.19 3. 15.99 Deadline. The application was received on November 9, 2018 and on November 19, the Prepared By: J. Barnhart Reviewed By: _Sb)R Approved By -TV AGENDA ITEM application fees were paid, completing the application. A decision must be made by January 18, 2019. The city may extend the review time up to an additional 60 days. 4. Public Comment: To date, no public comments have been received. 5. Staff Recommendation. If the Council feels that the standards for variance have been satisfied, they should approve the resolution as attached. If they do not, they should state reasons why, table action until January, and direct staff to draft a resolution of denial. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED 1. Waive Planning Commission review of the variance request 2. React to the Variance request: a. Finding that the applicant has addressed the standards for variance adequately, approve the variance via the attached resolution b. Finding that the applicant has not satisfied the standards for variance adequately, state reasons why, direct staff to draft a resolution of denial, and table action to January 14' Exhibits Exhibit A. Draft Resolution of approval Exhibit B. Application Summary Exhibit C. Proposed sign plan Exhibit D. Practical Difficulties form Exhibit E. Variance analysis Exhibit F. Resolution 5292 Prepared By: J. Barnhart Reviewed By: -TV Approved By -TGX CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL A RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE FROM MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 78-1478 FILE NO. LA18-000096 WHEREAS, on November 9, 2018, Orono Independent School District No. 278, a Minnesota public corporation, represented by Justin McCoy ("Applicant"), is the owner of the property located at 685 Old Crystal Bay Road North within the city of Orono (hereinafter "City" and legally described as: The south 940 feet of Government Lot 1, Section 33, Township 118, Range 23, also known as PID 33-118-23-21-0002, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter the "Property"); WHEREAS, on March 14, 2005, the City of Orono granted a variance permitting a free standing, electronic sign measuring 56 sq feet and 9'2" in height via resolution 5292; and WHEREAS, the Applicants have made application to the City of Orono for a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1478 to allow a freestanding sign larger than 56 sq ft and 9'2", the dimension granted by Resolution 5292; and WHEREAS, on December 10, 2018, after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the City Council held a public hearing, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, on the City Council reviewed the application and the recommendations of City staff, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby approves the requested variance as described above based on one or more of the following findings of fact concerning the Property: FINDINGS OF FACT: CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL This application was reviewed as Zoning File #LA18-000096. The analysis contained within staff memos and the exhibits attached to the aforesaid memos, all minutes from the above mentioned meetings, and any and all other materials distributed at these meetings are hereby incorporated by reference. 2. The Property is located in the RR -1B Zoning District. 3. Applicant has applied for the following variance[s]: a. Sign Height, maximum, per variance, is 9'2" inches. b. Sign Area, maximum, per variance, is 56 sq ft. 4. In considering this application for variance, the Council has considered the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. ANALYSIS: According to MN §462.537 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The ordinance is intended to allow for signage for non-residential uses in residential districts while moderating the impacts of signange. The proposed variance is for architectural features not contemplated with the original variance or ordinance, but does not detract. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The Comprehensive Plan does not speak to signage regulation specifically. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The property is used for public schools, based on the size a permitted use in the district. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; This is the only public school use in the city of Orono, and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The increase in signage over already permitted signage is not expected to alter the character of the locality. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78. This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as the use for a school is an allowed use in the RR -1B District, further, the ordinance allows for signage. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. This property is at the corner of two major roads; users of the school district complex, which includes the High school, Middle School, elementary school, and District Offices. Access to the facilities for most users is via Old Crystal Bay Road. The proposed sign is located at the south end of the complex, maximizing its potential to communicate information. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. While schools on lots 15 acres or greater are a permitted use, this is the only school in the RR -1B zoning district. A school is an intense, diverse use, often hosting a variety of educational, club, art, and athletic activities nightly, in addition to school classes during the day. These activities require dynamic communication of information. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The sign variance, if granted, allows the school district to both communicate the diverse activities found on school grounds, while also promoting their identity in a clear and profound manner. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Much of the additional sign area and height is air space, the variance will not support a sign that negatively impacts neighboring properties. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. A sign necessary to communicate the information provided by the school district, meeting the sign ordinance would likely be too small to be effective. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS: CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1478 to allow a freestanding, electronic changeable copy sign as depicted on the attached Axhibit A, subject to the following conditions: 1. Council approval is based on the entire record, above Findings. 2. 3. The approved project shall conform to the building plans submitted by the Applicants and annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibits A & B. 4. Any amendments to the plans which are not in conformity with City codes may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. 5. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the Applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the new sign by December 10, 2019, or the variance will expire on that date. 6. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution may result in the termination of any authority granted herein. ADOPTED by the Orono City Council on this 10th day of December, 2018. ATTEST: CITY OF ORONO: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor 4 Land Use Application Summary Application Date: 11/09/2018 Address: 685 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N LONG LAKE, MN 55356 Parcel Number: 3311823210002 Land Use Number: LA18-000096 Application Submitted property Owner By: Owner: Name: ORONO IND SCHOOL DIST NO 278 Address: 685 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N LONG LAKE, MN 55356 Applicant: Name: Justin McCoy Address: 685 N Old Crystal Bay Rd Orono, MN 55356 Contact Information: Associated Contact: Justin McCoy Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Project Description: Orono School District Sign Screen Replacement Land Use Application Type: Amendmend Application Appeal of Admin Decision Concept Application Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Application Subdivision Application Subdivision Exception Vacation Application Variance Application Applicant Signature: Hennepin Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Lake Cl _ 3er Orono 5chod Recreational � zeto UIVfJ F PE I1tgfawayr 11 .1_ "J ,Tl 7 tl~ Date: 11 /20/2018 Buffer Size: 500 0 205 410 820 Feet Map Comments: I I I I I I I I I This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (i) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitable for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable for any damage, injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information, contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South, Minneapolis, M N 55487/gis.info@hennepin.us RUN DATE: 11/20/2018 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM (PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE: 1 38 28-118-23 33 0001 38 33-118-23 13 0021 38 33-118-23 24 0013 ORONO IND SCHOOL DIST NO 278 PINE CORNER PROPERTIES LLC WEEKLEY HOMES LLC 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 550 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N 575 SANDHH L DR ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO IND SCHOOL DIST NO 278 PINE CORNER PROPERTIES LLC WEEKLEY HOMES LLC 685 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N 550 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N 1111 N POST OAK RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 HOUSTON TX 77055 38 28-118-23 33 0003 38 33-118-23 210001 38 33-118-23 24 0014 ORONO INDEP SCH DIST #278 SCHOOL DIST NO 1 I R CORCORAN & B CORCORAN 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 765 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N 585 SANDHILL DR ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO IND SCHOOL DIST NO 278 ORONO IND SCHOOL DIST NO 278 RYAN CORCORAN 685 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N 685 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N BROOKE CORCORAN LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 585 SANDHH L DR LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 28-118-23 33 0010 38 33-118-23 210002 38 33-118-23 24 0015 G & B LARSON SCHOOL DIST NO 1 I WEEKLEY HOMES LLC 3085 JAMESTOWN RD 685 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N 580 SANDHH L DR ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 GARY A LARSON ORONO IND SCHOOL DIST NO 278 WEEKLEY HOMES LLC 3085 JAMESTOWN RD 685 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N 1111 N POST OAK ROAD LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 HOUSTON TX 77055 38 28-118-23 34 0003 38 33-118-23 22 0001 38 33-118-23 24 0016 SCHOOL DIST NO 278 BARBARA LUPIENT TRUSTEE WEEKLEY HOMES LLC 795 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N 3200 WAYZATA BLVD W 570 SANDHILL DR ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO IND SCHOOL DIST NO 278 BARBARA LUPIENT WEEKLEY HOMES LLC 1025 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD C/O LUPIENT AUTOMOTIVE GRP 1111 POST OAK RD N LONG LAKE MN 55356 7100 WAYZATA BLVD #200 HOUSTON TX 77055 GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55426 38 28-118-23 43 0005 38 33-118-23 23 0002 38 33-118-23 24 0017 IND SCHOOL DIST #278 (ORONO) R E DUMAS & K G DUMAS WEEKLEY HOMES LLC 770 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N 3025 WAYZATA BLVD W 560 SANDHILL DR ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO IND SCHOOL DIST NO 278 ROBERT E & KATHRYN G DUMAS WEEKLEY HOMES LLC 685 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N 3025 WAYZATA BLVD 1111 N POST OAK ROAD LONG LAKE MN 55356 BOX 607 HOUSTON TX 77055 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 12 0002 38 33-118-23 24 0008 38 33-118-23 24 0018 PROFESSIONAL PROP ORONO LLP WEEKLEY HOMES LLC OP5 ORONO LLC 2765 KELLEY PKWY 2890 WOOD DUCK TR 550 SANDHILL DR ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 PROFESSIONAL PROP ORONO LLP WEEKLEY HOMES LLC OP5 ORONO LLC 835 PARTENWOOD RD I I I I N POST OAK ROAD 1660 HIGHWAY 100 S STE #400 LONG LAKE MN 55356 HOUSTON TX 77055 ST LOUIS PARK MN 55416 38 33-118-23 12 0004 38 33-118-23 24 0009 38 33-118-23 24 0019 CITY OF ORONO WEEKLEY HOMES LLC WEEKLEY HOMES LLC 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 2884 WOOD DUCK TR 540 SANDHH L DR ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 CITY OF ORONO WEEKLEY HOMES LLC WEEKLEY HOMES LLC 1335 BROWN RD S 1111 N POST OAK ROAD 1111 POST OAK RD N WAYZATA MN 55391 HOUSTON TX 77055 HOUSTON TX 77055 38 33-118-23 12 0007 38 33-118-23 24 0010 38 33-118-23 24 0031 H R A CITY OF ORONO WEEKLEY HOMES LLC STEPHANIE 14AWKINSON 2700 KELLEY PKWY 2872 WOOD DUCK TR 2895 WOOD DUCK TR ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 H R A CITY OF ORONO WEEKLEY HOMES LLC STEPHANIE HAWKINSON 2700 KELLEY PKWY I I11 N POST OAK RD 2895 WOOD DUCK TR LONG LAKE MN 55356 HOUSTON TX 77055 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 12 0008 38 33-118-23 24 0011 38 33-118-23 24 0032 ORONO APARTMENTS LLC WEEKLEY HOMES LLC KIRSTEN K REKSTAD 2745 KELLEY PKWY 2868 WOOD DUCK TR 2885 WOOD DUCK TR ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO APARTMENTS LLC WEEKLEY HOMES LLC KIRSTEN K REKSTAD P O BOX 849 1111 N POST OAK RD 2885 WOOD DUCK TR WAYZATA MN 55391 HOUSTON TX 77055 ORONO MN 55356 38 33-118-23 13 0019 38 33-118-23 24 0012 38 33-118-23 24 0033 METRO STORAGE ORONO LLC DARCY FLINN REVOCABLE TRUST STEVEN WENDLING & D WENDLING 2725 WAYZATA BLVD W 565 SANDHILL DR 2875 WOOD DUCK TR ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 METRO STORAGE HHF VENTURE DARCY FLINN STEVEN WENDLING METRO STORAGE LLC 565 SANDHILL DR DOREE WENDLING 13528 BOULTON BLVD LONG LAKE MN 55356 2875 WOOD DUCK TR LAKE FOREST IL 60045 LONG LAKE MN 55356 RUN DATE: 11/20/2018 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM (PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE: 2 38 33-118-23 24 0034 ANDREA N RATFIELD 2865 WOOD DUCK TR ORONO MN 55356 ANDREA N RATFIELD 2865 WOOD DUCK TR LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 33-118-23 24 0035 OP5 ORONO LLC 2855 WOOD DUCK TR ORONO MN 55356 OP5 ORONO LLC 1660 HIGHWAY 100 S STE #400 ST LOUIS PARK MN 55416 38 33-118-23 24 0036 OP5 ORONO LLC 545 SANDHILL DR ORONO MN 55356 OP5 ORONO LLC 1660 HIGHWAY 100 S STE #400 ST LOUIS PARK MN 55416 38 33-118-23 24 0037 OP5 ORONO LLC 535 SANDHILL DR ORONO MN 55356 OP5 ORONO LLC 1660 HIGHWAY 100 S STE #400 ST LOUIS PARK MN 55416 Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases. Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available. The viewer should understand, however, that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties, either express or implied, or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. 13'-C Grade: - Orono Public Schools - Long Lake 13'-0" 1 V-5" 2'2"4" HH -1 Furnish and Install (1) 6'-9" x 8'-1 " Full Color 15.85mm Message Center (1) LED Halo -Illuminated ID Header and (1) LED Face Illuminated Logo TP V A. Radius Aluminum Backer Painted 41 3135F Dark Bronze - 2" Deep with Finished Aluminum Back 13.4" x 4" Steel Square Tube Fainted 41 3135F Dark Bronze With Plates Attached To Masonry Structure C. `ORONO SCHOOLS'- 2" Deep LED Halo Illuminated Letter Set Painted Metallic Bronze with Diffuser Acrylic Dacker5 D. LED Face Illuminated Channel Logo with 3" Dark Bronze Returns and 1 " Dark Bronze Trim Cap 3/16" White Acrylic Face with First Surface Tanslucent Blue Vinyl E. 2" x 2" Steel Square Tube Frame For Attaching LED Channel Logo Fainted 41 3135E Dark Bronze F Aluminum Flashing Fainted 41 3135E Dark Bronze G. 6'-9" x 8'-1 "One -Sided 15.85mm Full Color Message Display - Include Structure on Back of Sign for Attachment H. Existing Brick Base - Dimensions TBV SPECTRUM SIGN SYSTEMS, INC 9278 Isanti St. NE Blaine, MN 55449 763.432.7447 >FFiCE 763.208.9159 FAX www.spectrum-signs.com AIM Electronics Attn: Brian Grand6trand 7655 Washington Ave 5. Edina, MN 55439 952-941-9830 685 N. Old Crystal Bay Road Long Lake, MN 55356 6-18-18 Patrick Woller Rick Ferraro This drawing is the exclusive property of Spectrum Sign Systems, Inc. It is not to be produced or duplicated without the written consent of Spectrum Sign Systems, Inc. Distribution of this drawing forthe purpose of constructing the sign by anyone other than Spectrum Sign Systems, Inc., is strictly prohibited. If such an event occurs Spectrum Sign Systems will be reimbursed $1,000.00 per occurrence. Customer Approval Date - Orono Public 5chool5 - Long Lake Existing *Remove Existing Message Center and Cabinets Proposed SPECTRUM SIGN SYSTEMS, INC 9278 Isanti St. NE Blaine, MN 55449 763.432.7447 OFFICE 763.208.9159 FAX www.spectrum-signs.com AIM Electronics Atm Brian Grandotrand 7655 Washington Ave S. Edina, MN 55439 952-941-9830 685 N. Old Crystal Bay Road Long Lake, MN 55356 6-18-18 Patrick Woller Rick Ferraro This drawing is the exclusive property of Spectrum Sign Systems, Inc. It is not to be produced or duplicated without the written consent of Spectrum Sign Systems, Inc. Distribution of this drawing forthe purpose ofconstructing the sign by anyone other than Spectrum Sign Systems,lncjs strictly prohibited. If such an event occurs Spectrum Sign Systems will be reimbursed $1,000.00 per occurrence. Customer Approval Date - Orono Public 5chool5 - Long Lake Night View SPECTRUM SIGN SYSTEMS, INC 9278 Isanti St. NE Blaine, MN 55449 763.432.7447 OFFICE 763.208.9159 FAX www.spectrum-signs.com AIM Electronics Atm Brian Grandotrand 7655 Washington Ave 5. Edina, MN 55439 952-941-9830 685 N. Old Crystal Bay Road Long Lake, MN 55356 6-18-18 Patrick Woller Rick Ferraro This drawing is the exclusive property of Spectrum Sign Systems, Inc. It is not to be produced or duplicated without the written consent of Spectrum Sign Systems, Inc. Distribution of this drawing forthe purpose ofconstructing the sign by anyone other than Spectrum Sign Systems,lncjs strictly prohibited. If such an event occurs Spectrum Sign Systems will be reimbursed $1,000.00 per occurrence. Customer Approval Date PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM LA1E-000096 1. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter. Response: The school district is requesting a variance change to the height of an allowed monument sign. 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. Response: The hardship for the variance request is not tied to our land but rather associated with the service and programs we run for the Orono Community. As programs have grown, sign request have increased. In an effort to promote our community and our students, we are asking to increase the size of our LED display and then add "Orono Schools" above the existing brick pillars. The "Orono Schools" would be above the allowed height restriction - Please see Drawings. 3. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality. Response: The sign is located in front of large buildings and trees and the height will not alter any sight lines. The sign is one of 3 in each corner of the intersection and does not alter the character of the area. 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. Response: N/A 5. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 1163.06, Subd. 2, when in harmony with this Chapter. Response: N/A 6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. Response: N/A 7. The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. Response: N/A 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. Response: N/A 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. Response: N/A 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Response: N/A 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. Response: N/A 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Response: N/A Variance Analysis LA18-000096 Applicable Regulations: Section 78-1478 Table 1: Sign Standards by Sign District Sign Type District 1 District District District District 2 3 4 5 Total Sign area on a parcel shall be in proportion to the lot frontage on a 5% of street, described by the ratio: 1 foot of 1:1 1:1 1:1 1:2.5 building street frontage to X feet of sign area, fagade unless otherwise noted FREESTANDING Type (b) M M M M M Total sign copy area 6 sf 32 sf 45 sf 45 sf 25 sf Max Height 8 ft. 8 ft. 12 ft. 20 ft. 8 ft. Lighting Not E/I/B E/I/B E/I/B E/I/B permitted Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.537 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The ordinance is intended to allow for signage for non-residential uses in residential districts while moderating the impacts of signange. The proposed variance is for architectural features not contemplated with the original variance or ordinance, but does not detract. FILE #LA18-000096 December 10, 2018 Page 2 of 3 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The Comprehensive Plan does not speak to signage regulation specifically. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The property is used for public schools, based on the size a permitted use in the district. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; This is the only public school use in the city of Orono, and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The increase in signage over already permitted signage is not expected to alter the character of the locality. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78. This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as the use for a school is an allowed use in the RR -1B District, further, the ordinance allows for signage. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. This property is at the corner of two major roads; users of the school district complex, which includes the High school, Middle School, elementary school, and District Offices. Access to the facilities for most users is via Old Crystal Bay Road. The proposed sign is located at the south end of the complex, maximizing its potential to communicate information. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. While schools on lots 15 acres or greater are a permitted use, this is the only school in the RR -1B zoning district. A school is an intense, diverse use, often hosting a variety of educational, club, art, and athletic activities nightly, in addition to school classes during the day. These activities require dynamic communication of information. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. The sign variance, if granted, allows the school district to both communicate the diverse activities found on school grounds, while also promoting their identity in a clear and profound manner. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Much of the additional sign area and height is air space, the variance will not support a sign that negatively impacts neighboring properties. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. A sign necessary to communicate the FILE #LA18-000096 December 10, 2018 Page 3 of 3 information provided by the school district, meeting the sign ordinance would likely be too small to be effective. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Practical Difficulties Statement Applicant has completed the Practical Difficulties Documentation Form and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Practical Difficulties The Council should carefully review the standards for variance. It seems clear that the signage will likely not impact adjacent properties to a discernable degree. Further, while the increase in overall square feet may appear drastic, is actually minimal due to the shape and configuration of the improvement. If the Council supports the variance, and finds additional variances are requested, it may be appropriate to adjust the city code. The permitted use of the property as a school introduces a number of diverse and intense activities. Information related to these activities must be communicated to those entering the school campus. • ti J� CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL No. 5292 A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 78-1467(1)(C) AND A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PURSUANT TO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTION 78-418(1) FILE NO. 05-3072 WHEREAS, Orono Public Schools #278, a Minnesota public corporation represented by Neal J. Lawson, Assistant Superintendent for Business (hereinafter "the applicant") is the owner of the property located at 685 Old Crystal Bay Road North within the City of Orono (hereinafter the "City") and legally described as follows: The south 940 feet of Government Lot 1, Section 33, Township 118, Range 23, also known as PID 33-118-23-21-0002, Hennepin County, Minnesota (hereinafter the "property"); and WHEREAS, the applicant has made application to the City of Orono for a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1467(l)(c) to allow signage greater than 12 square feet as permitted within Residential Districts; and WHEREAS, the applicant has made application to the City of Orono for a conditional use permit pursuant to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-418 (1) in order to construct a campus monument sign with a static electronic readerboard on school district property within a Residential District. NOW, THEREFORE DE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota: FINDINGS 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #05-3072. 2. The property is located in the RR -1B, One Family Rural Residential Zoning District which requires a minimum lot area of 2 acres and a minimum lot width of 200'. Page 1 of 7 • U • 04��0 A, 15 G~/ CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 59,99, 3. The Planning Commission reviewed this application at a public hearing held on January 18, 2005 and recommended approval of the sign size variance based on the following findings: a. The property is 39.8 acres in area and has frontage along Highway 12 and Old Crystal Bay Road North. b. The current Orono Zoning Code does not have sign standards for institutional uses allowed conditionally within Residential Districts. Within Residential Districts a nameplate sign with a maximum of 12 s.f is permitted. c. The new campus monument sign and static electronic readerboard should reduce or eliminate the need for temporary signage on the property. 4. The Planning Commission reviewed this application at a public hearing held on January 18, 2005 and recommended approval of the conditional use permit for a campus monument sign based on the following findings: a.' The existing monument sign is outdated, smaller and poorly located on the property; the new monument sign will be modern, larger and easier to read from the intersection. b. The existing monument sign contains a manually changeable readerboard which is difficult to maintain; the new sign will contain an electronically changeable readerboard which is not proposed to flash. A flashing sign is not permitted. c. The new campus monument sign will conform to Zoning Code Section 78-1466(11) regarding monument signs, and will not have total a sign face area greater than 56 s.f. 5. The City Council makes the following additional findings: a. A 1' x 8' panel on the new campus monument sign has been dedicated for school sponsor recognition. This panel will be constructed of the same material as the school name plate panel. The Council does not intend that this panel be used as a commercial billboard for Page 2 of 7 • • • J CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 59 advertising, but merely as recognition for the school sponsor or supporters. : b. The Council finds that the sponsor panel element of the proposed monument sign is appropriate for this site only because it will have the following characteristics which support its approval: i. The main purpose of the monument sign is to show the location of the governmental jurisdiction's facilities. ii. The sponsor panel is a minor element of a monument sign showing the location of a governmental jurisdiction's facilities. iii. The sign is located on the property of a governmental jurisdiction. iv. The sponsor panel is only 12 inches in height and 96 inches in length. v. The sponsor panel will be located under the main portion of the sign, and the bottom of the panel will not be more than 24 inches above the ground. vi. The language of the sponsor panel indicates support for the governmental jurisdiction as follows: ["donor name" supports the "governmental jurisdiction name"]. vii. The sign is located in compliance with the setbacks established within the Orono Sign Code and will have no negative visual impacts because of its size and because it is located approximately 65' from the traveled roadway of Highway 12. viii. The applicant will allow the City to reconsider the sponsor panel element of the CUP approval should the sponsor panel become inconsistent with subsequent City Code revisions. c. Council review of future changes or updates to the new campus monument sign panels 'will not be necessary unless City staff determine they do not meet the intent of this Resolution. Page 3 of 7 • • U CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. d. The new monument sign with static readerboard should reduce or eliminate the need for temporary signage. 6. The City Council has considered this application including the findings and recommendation of the Planning Commission, reports by City staff, comments by the applicant and the public, and the effect of the proposed variance on the health, safety and welfare of the community. 7. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on this property are peculiar to it and do not apply generally to other property in this zoning district; that granting the variance would not adversely affect traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial property right of the applicant; and would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan of the City. CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1467(1)(c) to allow a 56 s.f. sign where a maximum 12 s.f. sign is normally allowed and a conditional use permit for a new campus monument sign with static electronic readerboard to be constructed for the Orono Public School an institutional use allowed conditionally within the RR -1B Residential Zoning District, subject to the following conditions: 1. Council approval is based on the site plan submitted by the applicant and annotated by City staff, attached to _ this Resolution as Exhibit A. Any amendments to the site plan which are not in conformity with City codes will require further Planning Commission and City Council review. 2. Subsequent changes or updates to the new campus monument sign panels shall be reviewed administratively by Planning Staff. Planning staff may require Council review of changes if they do not meet the intent of this Resolution. 3. The school shall obtain City sign permits for any temporary signage needed in the future. Page 4 of 7 • • CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL No. 5292 4. Removal of the existing sign is required and its removal shall be completed upon commencement of the use of the new sign. 5. The applicant specifically agrees that if subsequent City Ordinances make the sponsor panel element of the monument sign non -conforming, the City shall have the right to require its revision or removal to conform with such ordinances. 6. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the property not with the applicant, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the new construction within one year of the date of Council approval, or the variance will expire on that date (March 14, 2006). 7. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution shall constitute a violation of the zoning code, shall automatically terminate any authority granted herein, and shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. 8. The undersigned applicant has read, understood and hereby, agrees to the terms of this resolution and on behalf of the applicant and the applicant's heirs, successors and assigns, hereby agrees to the recording of this resolution in the chain of title of the property. Adopted by the Orono City Council on the 14`h day of March, 2005. Page 5 of 7 • is ATTEST: Linda S. Vee, City Clerk - -! I r --- STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 5292 - . Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this o29 day of �, 2005 by Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN Not Public The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on thisO � day of rY�e- cAb� , 2005 by Linda S. Vee, City Clerk of the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf of the City. 1.rrlllJYllfllllllJl..�f!!.11lll.A' all Notary Public Page 6 of 7 • • • STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. $� This instrument was acknowledged before me this i5 day of m _ , 2005 by Neal J. Lawson, Assistant Superintendent for Business, on behalf of the Orono Public School #278, a Minnesota public corporation. ../-!✓!-111./'✓!!J!!!!!!1!!!ll ✓" l� ,F,_ ��' •1 1 � 1�' lllllll ...... ill ALI, Notary Public Page 7 of 7 • - — w>as�cxw�s�31fi'E Z EXIt lg IT �O iN r P h Z 0 1 U -1 7_ P ro TENNIS COJP,T 0 L D G' R Y S T A L m n 92 3X r�z rn mg C t:, m in �.• n I'!26.1 DITU11111DUS EWE NP62 1'—V?sisr1•y Right-oP-Nu;! ul' [lid C Day P.oud, pet` Doc. 1'•Iq• 11Fd1m D A Y R II A D 1 h*"" HIIY Ihpl Ihir plan m by dlrael 0 D ' r --iixe3i m euPervlaton and Ilial 1 m a dory nDlalmd In De1pE 4RC4 TcCT Slale ii N ,I O ' O ' 1 Ylmn-cllaa pole Rog. Hp. Rwlalona RONO CAMPUS IMPROVE Sh..l ORONO PUBLIC SCHOOLS -Atl •wo ORONO, MINNESOTA LANDSCAPE PLAN ORONO SCHOOL DISTMCT INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DtSMCT e2TB of 2 TENNIS COJP,T 0 L D G' R Y S T A L m n 92 3X r�z rn mg C t:, m in �.• n I'!26.1 DITU11111DUS EWE NP62 1'—V?sisr1•y Right-oP-Nu;! ul' [lid C Day P.oud, pet` Doc. 1'•Iq• 11Fd1m D A Y R II A D 1 h*"" HIIY Ihpl Ihir plan m by dlrael Pralaal No. dni ANDERSON- JOHNSON Rraporod ma w under my --iixe3i ASSOCIATES, �� `a euPervlaton and Ilial 1 m a dory nDlalmd In De1pE 4RC4 TcCT Slale ppje p pnn By NO INC ° � under the lire PI the 17.]B.d Ck. BY JRP !dXDSCYPEABCN!TECT!!RE SlfEPLIA'A'IA'G CIITLENCIAFENW 1 Ylmn-cllaa pole Rog. Hp. Rwlalona 1J1!a0lDLYAa fA6N eIArPJIa ATl'Latlta-JJ4! nrrfv'! jI pu(murl4TlJr JAYMPOLIERDY m z En En -q m x In so AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 27 Date: December 10, 2018 Item Description: LAI 8-000092, Easement Vacation — Public Hearing Presenter: Melanie Curtis Agenda Public Hearing Planner Section: Purpose. The purpose of this item is to hold a public hearing to consider vacation of drainage and utility easements which are being replaced with new easements on the plat of Pence Lane Addition. 2. Background. On November 26', the City Council approved the final plat for Pence Lane Addition, a two lot subdivision of property at 2709 Walters Port Lane. There are existing drainage and utility easements which were dedicated with the plat of Carman Heights in 1982 and in the plat of Walters -Port in 1961. With the Pence Lane Addition plat these easements have been expanded in the area of the wetland and reduced from 20 feet to 10 feet on the southern portion of the east lot line of Lot 2 to be consistent with the current requirements. These changes are highlighted on the attached easement description (Exhibit D). No drainage improvements are located in the western 10 feet of the existing perimeter easement to be vacated. 3. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends approval. The easement vacation will be recorded at the same time/prior to the recording of the plat establishing the replacement easements. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Staff recommends the Council open a public hearing to receive any public comment and approve the easement vacation. Exhibits A. Resolution B. Pence Lane Addition Plat C. Carman Bay Heights D. Legal Description of Easements to be Vacated Prepared By: MOO Reviewed By: J. Barnhart Approved By A RESOLUTION VACATING DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS WITHIN CARMAN BAY HEIGHTS AND WALTERS-PORT HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA - FILE NO. LA18-000092 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, William M. Dunkley and Susan K. Dunkley (hereinafter the "Owners") are owners of the property within the City of Orono, and legally described as follows: Lot 1, Block 1, Carman Bay Heights; and Lot 4, Block 1, Walters -Port, Hennepin County (hereinafter the "Property); and WHEREAS, the Property is subject to drainage and utility easements dedicated at the time of platting of the Walters -Port and Carman Bay Heights additions; and WHEREAS, the portions of the existing easements to be vacated are described on Exhibit A and are depicted on Exhibit B; and WHEREAS, the City has accepted dedication of replacement drainage and utility easements with the platting of the Property as Pence Lane Addition; and WHEREAS, after due published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the Orono, Minnesota, City Code, the Orono City Council held a public hearing on December 10, 2018 regarding said vacation and all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard; and WHEREAS, the Orono City Council finds the vacation as proposed is in keeping with the public interest and in consideration of the following findings: 1. The City Council finds that the existing easement area to be vacated will be redundant once Pence Lane Addition is recorded. 2. The vacation does not affect access to or use of any adjoining property. The Owners' legal access to the Property will not be affected by the vacation of the easements and no adjacent or nearby properties will have their access limited by it. 3. No utilities will be affected by vacation of the Easement NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the vacation of the portion of existing drainage and utility easements described and depicted in Exhibits A and B is hereby granted by the City Council of the City of Orono on this 10th day of December, 2018, such vacation to be filed with Hennepin County concurrently with the plat of Pence Lane Addition. ADOPTED by the Orono City Council on this 26th day of November, 2018. ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor Easements to be Vacated: • The drainage and utility easements, drainage easement and utility easement over Lot 1, Block 1, Carman Bay Heights, as dedicated in said plat. • The easement for drainage purposes per Document No. 1491702 over part of Lot 1, Block 1, Carman Bay Heights. (This easement covers the same area shown as the drainage easement on the plat of Carman Bay Heights). • The utility and drainage easement over the east 5 feet of Lot 5, Block 3, Walters -Port, as dedicated in said plat. OR 14 IN A WA 1. TER 5 -PORT T` `t- ° ' "x iA 7 � SPO! d. 48-4944' 16, 06k \ P f i I . r - . z r o 3 'n a- �\ lip \ \ L!J 42- Sco%J'•60, • QEN07&5 /AtV A4avawENT3 B4O,i,V a .3bown or* oax,~ v M T, r, C ARLEICW C. SMI TH POW U ,9dv Enyr 4 [avid So-tya^ Z� \ /62/5 WoywAvB/vd, Woyzo>o, Minn. \\ y CARMAN BAY HEIGHTS GORDON R. COFFIN CO., INC. LAKE ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS MINNETONKA LONG LAKE, MINNESOTA 08Q 160 'z\ SCALE IN FEET N 89°27•5S' E BEARINGS SHOWN ARE ASSUMED 175.54me06ured 175.aOAu4Sab Na344,p l \ A — — &-- .— _— r , � g V RI p a t %b o Denotes iron monumenlj I I 0 Denotes Judicial Landmark set per No. 14546 'w Q L Totters Cane I Water elevation on December 22, 1981 was 928.60 feet, N.G. V. D. 1929 III I r`• I �� Highest known waterelevarion of Lake Minnetonka = was 930.51 feet N.G.V.D. 1929, according to the Minnesota Deportment of Natural Resources. I Benchmark is a chiselled N" on the concrete base\\\03, •s ' o c o at NW corner of pumphouse at Gro Bay dam; aR '-1 r_ _ I1. —� ♦J, elevation is 932.87 feet N.G.V. O. 1929. .� �- o tdrainage :��j'� z 1 easemem� -- t _ t LLQ -Q DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS SHOWN THUS: g 5 I 5 I Being 10.00 feet in width and adjoining block lines, and _Y — being 5.00 feet in width and adjoining let lines unless otherwise indicated On the plot. (J, id 20 o/ r---------- `�a> o �NB9a27rW 146.30 8 9J II e J m z z `•I' W 1 I C 10 LOT 2 d—survey line I `6I 10 1 •, z1 II0.00IN _ 7ga 6.06 « W _182 8 2.54_TI L1\ I GORDON R. COFFIN CO., INC. LAKE ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS MINNETONKA LONG LAKE, MINNESOTA a E I ki I I 10 1 1 Know all persons by these presents that William M. Dunkley and Susan K Dunkley, husband and wife, fee owners of the following described property situated in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, to wit: Lot 1, Block 1, CARMAN BAY HEIGHTS Z Lot 4, Block 3, WALTERS-PORT Have caused the same to be survey and platted as PENCE LANE ADDITION, and do hereby dedicate to the public for public use forever the drainage and utility easements as shown on the plat. In witness whereof said William M. Dunkley and Susan K. Dunkley, husband and wife have hereunto set their hands this day of , 20 WILLIAM M. DUNKLEY SUSAN K. DUNKLEY STATE OF COUNTY OF This instrument was acknowledged before me this 20 , by William M. Dunkley and Susan K. Dunkley, husband and wife. Notary Public, County My commision expires Notarys printed name day of I Mark S. Gronberg do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on this plat; that all monuments depicted on this plat have been, or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statues, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, as of the date of this certificate are shown and labled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. Dated this day of , 20 Mark S. Gronberg Licensed Land Surveyor Minnesota License Number 12755 STATE OF COUNTY OF 20 by Mark S. Gronberg. Notary Public, County My commision expires City Council, City of Orono, Minnesota This instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , Notarys printed name This plat of PENCE LANE ADDITION was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, at a regular meeting thereof held this day of , 20 , and said plat is in compliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. City Council, City Of Orono, Minnesota , Mayor . Clerk RESIDENT AND REAL ESTATE SERVICES, Hennepin County, Minnesota I hereby certify that taxes payable in 20 and prior years have been paid for land described on this plat, dated this of , 20 Mark V. Chapin, County Auditor By SURVEY DIVISION, Hennepin County, Minnesota Pursuant to MN. STAT. Sec. 383B.565, (1969), this plat has been approved this Chris F. Mavis, County Surveyor By Deputy REGISTRAR OF TITLES, Hennepin County, Minnesota I hereby certify that the within plat of PENCE LANE ADDITION was filed in this office this 20 , at o'clock . M. Martin McCormick, Registrar of Titles By day of Deputy day of ,20 day GRONBERG & ASSOCIATES, INC. ENGINEERS, LAND SURVEYORS, PLANNERS SHEET 1 OF 2 SHEETS N 5805712" E 30.74 SCALE IN FEET Denotes Judicial Land Mark Denotes found iron marker, as noted Denotes 1/2 inch x 14 inch set iron marker marked by Mn. Lic. No. 12755 For purposes of this survey, the North line of Lot 1, Block 1, CARMAN BAY HEIGHTS is assumed to have a bearing of S 89°59'22" E Drainage and utility easements shown thus: II Being 5 feet in width, unless otherwise indicated, and adjoining lot lines, and being 10 feet in width, and adjoining right of way lines unless otherwise indicated on the plat. PENCE LANE ADDITION 10 LOT J - - SURVEY LINE N 04026'46" E R=10.00 0=90000'00" L=15.71 SHORELINE OF LAKE MINNETONKA AS LOCATED ON 21 AUGUST 2018 N 00°32'43" E 45+ - SHORELINE OF LAKE MINNETONKA AS SHOWN ON PLAT OF WALTERS-PORT DETAIL NOT TO SCALE S 89027'17" E 16+- R=1 0.00 6+- R=10.00 0=90°00'00 L=15.71 LAKE MINNETONKA GRONBERG & ASSOCIATES, INC. NW CORNER OF RLS NO. 310 S 06024'17" E 20.00 cow Cb. V 44/ A, Cb�' otic' ,b / N 00032'43" E 116.20 SHORELINE OF LAKE MINNETONKA AS SHOWN ON PLAT OF WALTERS-PORT ENGINEERS, LAND SURVEYORS, PLANNERS LAKE SHORELINE OF LAKE MINNETONKA AS LOCATED ON 21 AUGUST 2018 MINNETONKA HIGHEST KNOWN LAKE ELEVATION OF LAKE MINNETONKA WAS 931.11 FT., NGVD-1929 ON 6-23-14, ACCORDING TO THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES WATER ELEVATION OF LAKE MINNETONKA WAS 928.85 FT., NGVD-1929 ON AUGUST 21, 2018 BENCHMARK IS A BRASS DISC SURVEY MONUMENT IN GROUND 15 FEET WEST OF SWALE RIPRAP, 25 FEET NORTH OF CONCRETE CURB AT EXIT OF GRAYS BAY AREA, ELEVATION=932.7FT., NGVD-1929 CARMAN'S BAY SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS twnt -.,� .±M•.:,}w+.wr .:+ra. �....w.wvn+T..r-ww. �.+.: ..•w vr...rs.�r w.r. sas+w..r�.,.r...:, �... .��.:• a d tt s clivi ion ober 344', , e etaatd►; olaN, -according to the plat, thereof on file or GHrs at m Ali ©fffeo of the flogistrar ' of Titles In and for said 'County, harmer alareaad .oNme to be ss yod and platted as C DAY IW2M , and do heretp► domte and dedioate to the Pldk f po liat tpwe fcatvv*r the drainage and utility aarsaeriente as shown an this plat. in vs -t f ' seld' Vda sol C. Plubs and Satsamme nubs, husband *0 wife, have hsrrrvoto sot their hands this days 195; said William Z. MMik and Beverly C. i!lfiera►k, hmbknd and wife* have "'hereto set. t to .t g fury of' , 196; and said First feral Swings and Loam Association of M nne- arple ; a< M"001F rta has caused Uwe presents to be signed' by its proper office,re and its eorpo- arts owl to, ba to affixed, this.. day of Xl.erlr►el Q. nvamt svmme Flvbrn /%,I } fly C.„ k . t,... •.. , V .i VIM NOW" MTM AND UW MCIMON Oi ' 1EISM IrOLI$. C ✓ Igo its !N FEET., SCALEIts s .. to et ," }` . IC?544 BEARINGS SHOWN ARE ASSUMED The faaredle arg iestry t mat ar leder before w this o�` of t o mat �.�vmXW 01} iest aratrhtrtd bel .sr iris ,..w. of , l'.,�..r i C Yilli�nt + k amid 90vorly T*. *ndk, bias a wift. � , � E111wety►s JudieiM ltwd�otk est O�w .� y � � e� Toms Cas wo t+1l+Es [ r Vr oo"i0' expires r , y I Rory g beftrdarl At, acral �.. s a a 1 pit► ftkm oW#"ft do Ow 22, wire flat , apt "v o. terms /{ tti�ssf iMo�"ywa�iOA of iaa�ite 1�Itasl�Mlo N. W" 9 loot flAv.O. 192$, emodin4 M ft �' ! •• mohm eto oowfs*nt of "twel ftww=$. ' +`. awl. : asselfirsd Ali =plat aur 1' G # that x., t ' t .on acre oorroat ' ahtwta feet and refit lat. a x. ledrtsa�aat o s •T 1 dot 1J trrk !s • c rro an tMe a . , J i. ir>rl the ,parte a�rtf,e lit are � lE1At ` of W � ; ' ds�r:,.,'; trr tion is' S31.aF�' lift 1/.rf V.o. E be Iia Iced oar tearid t. yrs !9 ! cs and t � 0 f 1 e; " z 1 _ = T, ...:.., ;.. . _;'e ., ., id►lraf warir bad and taf9C'!arled + tref`�re sr, a aft pab�tiQ within a %6%*e tM& dw off" s l' sIV andea IL Gorma head ey or. 6kktftW AND UTLrrY EARMENTS 40M T14US- ol! ems July ,, mum dsrnl 00 W M width and odJd t 010* tins:, see win &(* fwt in Ir"* end ed jo " rot rets s ` f oftrwiss ia1114ow etc Me Pm., `` r ,.�► 1 r t 1Ri o` ed orad awspled by Us Cf it of the City Of Oftft r r i if iorriEsle, the t osaMerts and te►- `, rswt • 46&lhe %r have been ivod: tv the Civ,r or apt or emb sort m tts and 1,8 001 rtione as padded bF Wit.* w _ rsaeo`a r Over A*draistratm00 'dam t _ ►, `-s p ,#err fl w.. fit► g t � -�qt 'bear aarF a3 years prior to ,., for 1 described on this plant. Vermom T 40ppo a ltreetor , ! ..�... .,Tax Clark ' LOT 2 us - tnrv�y tins f oil, 11 4k*f 'tIrt '1t t bei i l3 ,�.,_ of s 196.x.;,,,« jr '�'• y r t r I whre lipid ice: tom►, er!"tiar 11a0 ,....,.. daFy of 1 010 i . Dyer ,,ftrlom, ftglstrur,of--fitlom Iv Vapor SORD N R. +fit Ft"N M., ISG. o L LAKE � r NGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS *NNE TONKA IV .ONG LASE, MINNESOTA ,. Li At A 0 EASEMENTS TO BE VACATED BY THE CITY OF ORONO IN THE PLATS OF CARMAN BAY HEIGHTS & WALTERS-PORT 1) The drainage and utility easements, drainage easement and utility easement over Lot 1, Block 1, Carman Bay Heights, as dedicated in said plat. 2) The easement for drainage purposes per Document No. 1491702 over part of Lot 1, Block 1, Carman Bay Heights. (This easement covers the same area shown as the drainage easement on the plat of Carman Bay Heights). 3) The utility and drainage easement over the east 5 feet of Lot 5, Block 3, Walters -Port, as dedicated in said plat. GRONBERG & ASSOGIATJ& Ur 445 N. WUJLOW IDL LONG LAKE, MN 55356 OR I r4 INA, --/ATC OL WAITER 5 = POR Ta•�y �:-2 14" i_ a I u 9 pi< �q2' 1110. 0, C4 A Z) C) $Cole ZWVorff5 1ADV 1WWU0eA17- ra r4 r;j E c, • I 'l O \ '�.�.a� j I JA U 'rf JIry Olt It 6 A09LEISN C SM17*H mey flvr if Land wayzato, Minn. �\ �� CARMAN BAY HEIGH rS \ I 0 BQ 1I JC c SCALE IN FEET\ N x27'55• E r BEARINGS SHOWN ARE ASSUMED 17s.5a soAudSub No 3aa ,• measured 17s --- (t, �J L .o I y % ¢.1h0o't 1 O � I s o Denotes iron monument I oF 0 Denotes Judwiol Landmork set per A' I I N Torrens Case No. 14546 I \V LI I I \ f ! I Wotan elevation on December 22, 1981 was 928.60 feet, N.G.V. D. 1929 11 I 1 r�. `• '`�` Highestknown water elevation of Lake Minnetonka was 930.51 feet N.G...D. 1929, according to the = I Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.Benchmark on the ,e box lled asepliDuse \�f \ I ...\\\039 p_ at NW carnersof pun at Groy's Bay ddamN" J � elevation is 932.87 het N.G.V. O. 1929. l — 0I /drain _— i easementsin C� So DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS SHOWN THUS! I` 2 4 Being 10.00 feet in width and adjoining block lines, and I ..�� being 5.00 feet in width and adjoining lot lines unless otherwise indicated on the plot. �' J 40 OR t g j re ..t 20 �l , O -JII o -N 89FZ7rW 14630 Sty i /ie J ru m z i a �fc as i WI LOT 2 g \ 1 '♦ -survey tire M IO N�7go27'W ZI i 110.Op — N7B°=6•p6I N W 82.34 I i iii -- C GORDON R. COFFIN CO., INC. LAKE 2 ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS M�NNETONKA LONG LAKE, MINNESOTA 14917OZ THIS RMEMt3RE, made and entered into this 19th day of May 1982 by and between MICHAEL G. PLUHM and SUSANNE _ PLUIM, husband and wife, their heirs, assigns, successors (hereinafter collectively referred to as the Grantors) and the CITY OF ORONO, its successors and assigns, a mEmicipal corporation under the laws of the State of Minnesota (hereinafter referred to as the Grantee). WITNSSEIH, Grantors for and in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) and other valuable consideration, hereby covenant, grant, gift, quit claim and convey to the Grantee an easement for drainage purposes over, under and across premises in Hennepin County, Minnesota described as: That part of Lot 1, Block 1, Caram Bay Heights, described as follows: Coamencing at the Nartheast corner of said Lot; thence South 7°29'23" West along the East line of said Lot to an angle point in said East line; thence South 0°01'42" West along said t� East line a distance of 142.87 feet to the point of beginning of the property being described; thence continuing South 0°01'42" West along said East line a distance of 20 feet; thence on a bearing of West a distance of 80 feet; thence an a bearing of South a distance of 25 feet; thence South 75° West a distance r of 66.67 feet; thence North 70° West to a segment of the West J line of said Lot; thence North 0°33' East a distance of 101.98 feet along said segment of the West line; thence South 65° East a distance of 103.97 feet; thence an a bearing of South a dis- tance of 7 feet; thence on a bearing of East to the point of beginning. Grantors do hereby remiss, release, acquit and forever discharge, the Grantee and all of its officers and employees of aid from any and all claims, demands or causes of action of any kind or nature whatsoever which may arise or accrue by virtue of any flowage or trespass with water within.the drainage easement described herein. Grantors do not intend that the public should have any interest in the above land by virtue of this indenture or otherwise. Grantors certify that the easement tract described herein is free and clear of all encumbrances. Grantors reserve the right to construct a driveway over the easterly 60 feet of said easement. Grantors shall not construct, erect or place upon, above, or beneath the land described herein, any form of structure which would tend to alter, impede or change the existing drainage, without the written consent of Grantee. All provisions hereof shall run with the land and shall extend to and bind the heirs, successors, representatives, grantees or assigns of the respective parties hereto. �'- w Mi 1 G. Plubm s Susanne , SPATE OF MIMV SMA ) ) ss ODUNTY OF HE[gE?T-N ) On this 19th day of May, 1982, before me, a notary public, personally appeared Michael G. Pluhm and Susanne Min, husband and wife, to me known to be the persons described in and who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that they executed said instrumezkt.-as their own free act and deed. State Deed Tax Hereon Due: Exempt THIS TNSTRLR1DU WAS DRAFTED BY: �s=� :; GERALD T.CARROLL,JR' W=, GARROLL & PEARSON NOTARYPUBLIO- MINNESOTA 1100 First Bank Place West + HENNEPIN COUNTY Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 My Commis9lon Expires Oct Ys, soca ro�oac;. m m M 10 M v No dsStttRu^. at tarts Lid trans~: eiftared QEPAitIMT OF M?(MTY TAXATION HMEPIN COUNTY MINN. 12 Lm TV NA pa��,�. 00, %;* a R+AW wet to cep m Vt v m 1 rrl T C n 0 1b, c (1 in T � m m r m cn O � N Z 02 M' Z v j m rO N ,° a ,U 0 No dsStttRu^. at tarts Lid trans~: eiftared QEPAitIMT OF M?(MTY TAXATION HMEPIN COUNTY MINN. 12 Lm TV NA pa��,�. 00, %;* a R+AW wet to cep AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 28 Date: December 10, 2018 Item Description: LAI 8-000044 City of Orono Comprehensive Plan Amendment Presenter: Jeremy Barnhart Agenda Planning Department Community Development Director Section: Report 1. Purpose. The purpose of this item is to approve, via resolution, the 2020-2040 Comprehensive Plan and submit the same to the Met Council for their review. 2. Background. The City Council established a committee of residents to guide the development of the plan update. Their main goals were to: Retain rural character and natural resource protection policies established previously, satisfy Met Council requirements, and improve readability of the document. This resulting document was distributed in draft form in April for a required 6 month review period. Exhibit D includes comments received during their review period. Open Houses were held in May and October to facilitate additional comments and feedback from interested parties. The plan provided shows changes made to the document since the April, 2018 draft. Because this draft shows all changes, the page numbers may not align with the table of contents. Upon Council approval, the changes will be accepted or rejected, as appropriate, and the table of contents and the Minimum standards worksheet (Exhibit G) will be updated. A brief summary of the main points. This is not intended to be the comprehensive list: 3A Environmental Protection. Environmental protection is the foundation of land use in Orono. This chapter incorporates the Storm Water Management Plan (as Appendix 3A -A). 3B Land Use. Land Use Planning is used to ensure that opportunities are available to meet growth projections. Each residential land use was assigned a density range, and the met Council looks only at the lowest number in the range to determine opportunity. Land use changes are summarized in Exhibit E. Density was introduced near high traffic corridors as a buffer for single family residential. Based on capacity concerns of Shoreline, density was introduces to additional areas along Wayzata Blvd. 3C Housing. The housing goals stayed the same from 2008, which included a broader range of housing choices (starter, empty nester, and senior) and housing rehabilitation. The city is required to provide opportunity for 154 units of housing affordable for people making 80% or less of the Average Median Income. Currently, there are 639 such units. We meet this requirement by providing certain properties at densities 8 units per acre or greater. The various tools available to cities and developers for affordable housing are listed on page 3C-16. It includes a statement that while available, the city very conservatively uses tax dollars to assist private development. If the Council desires stronger language, let me know. 4A Transportation. The Transportation plan reflects regional transportation plan, no new transportation corridors. The plan continues to promote the ring route concept, and supports LMCD regulations on seaplane operation. 4B Sewer. The sewer plan includes one small expansion of the MUSA to serve a possible Preparcd By: J. Barnhart Reviewed By: -Sb)R Approved By -T)a development of 1003 Wildhurst, as supported by the City Council in October. Additional discussion regarding inflow and infiltration was added based on Met Council comments. 4C Water. This chapter reflects the latest Water supply plan, most recently completed in 2013. It includes expansion of water into two areas in the north side of Orono. (Map 4C-1). The plan notes that water storage in the Navarre Area is currently at a slight deficit, which can be remedied with a larger tank, water conservation, or other methods. The deficit is not at a level that requires immediate attention. 3. 15.99 Deadline. Not Applicable 4. Planning Commission Vote and Comment. The Planning Commission reviewed the plan at their meeting on November 19`h. The commission had questions related to housing calculations, Met Council assistance, and open space preservation. The Commission recommended approval of the document with a vote of 6-0. PC Minutes are attached as Exhibit D. 5. Public Comment. Written comments were provided to the Planning Commission prior to the meeting and attached here as Exhibit E. No additional comments were received during the public hearing. 6. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends adoption of the 2020-2040 Comprehensive Plan and resolution (Exhibit B), directing staff to submit the plan for formal review by the Met Council. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Exhibits Exhibit A. Draft Plan Exhibit B. Resolution Exhibit C. Planning Commission Staff report Exhibit D. Planning Commission Minutes dated 11-19-18 (draft) Exhibit E. Written comments received to date. Exhibit F. Land Use changes, summarized Exhibit G. Minimum standards worksheet Prepared By: J. Barnhart Reviewed By: Approved By CMP Part 1. Introduction TABLE OF CONTENTS CMP PART 1 INTRODUCTION Contents PURPOSE.........................................................................................................................2 TITLE...............................................................................................................................2 SCOPE..............................................................................................................................2 OVERVIEW.....................................................................................................................3 Figure 1-1: The Urbanization Spiral..........................................................................4 COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT PLAN ORGANIZATION........................................5 City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 1, Page 1 CMP Part 1. Introduction CMP PART 1 INTRODUCTION PURPOSE The purpose of this plan is to document and reinforce the established goals, policies and principles of the City of Orono as a guide for orderly and economic private development and public improvement in the years ahead. Major emphasis is on the needs and involvement of people. The Plan discusses how people can manage their environment, how people have become involved with municipal decisions, how people can create and continue the lifestyle and community that we know as Orono. This Plan is a revised, expanded and updated version of Orono's 2010-2030 Community Management Plan (CMP). It reflects the City's long-established philosophy, goals and policies that were first introduced in the 1974 Orono Comprehensive Guide Plan and later solidified within the 1980 Orono CMP. Major policy direction remains relatively unchanged but the content has been revised and updated to reflect the changes the City and the Metropolitan Area has undergone since 2010. TITLE The title of this document is the Community Management Plan. Throughout this document, the Community Management Plan will be abbreviated as "CMP". SCOPE The scope of this Plan is intended to include almost every factor that influences investments or improvements in the City, whether by private individuals or government involvement. Each section of the Plan stands on its own merits yet is an integral part of the whole. For instance, Orono's history and natural features are explored as factors explaining and constraining contemporary decisions. The Land Use Management section becomes the primary tool for formulation of zoning regulations and development proposals. Planning of transportation, recreation and sewer services allows for coordination of capital investment with land management and regional system capacity. Relevance of the Plan is important as concepts must be current to be fully understood or implemented. Regular and ongoing reviews are to be conducted by the Planning Commission and City Council to renew this understanding in light of changing attitudes and events. Careful reading will reveal that Orono's past history and current goals have remained essentially the same. Therefore, the reader is advised that for all intents and purposes, this Plan and its impact on local development are intended to be permanent. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 1, Page 2 CMP Part 1. Introduction OVERVIEW The basic concerns and philosophies of Orono citizens have evolved through the City's history and its intimate ties with Lake Minnetonka. Map No. 1-1 locates Orono in relationship to Minneapolis and the western suburbs. More importantly, it clearly indicates the relative importance of Orono to the total watershed of Lake Minnetonka. No other city bordering the Lake has as much water area, as much shoreline, or as much watershed land area as Orono. Orono is committed to effective land use planning and permanent environmental protection in an effort to preserve the great resources of Lake Minnetonka for the benefit of all regional residents. The people of Orono, though of diverse interests, have been drawn together by a slow-paced lifestyle and quiet amenities. Their common tie is a commitment to maintain those attractions of which Lake Minnetonka is the most visible example. In the 1950's, increasing urbanization all around Lake Minnetonka threatened to environmentally "kill" the Lake by uncontrolled discharge of nutrients. Citizens became concerned. Their first reaction caused lake area municipalities to begin extending sewer systems to eliminate individual septic system discharges. This helped the situation at first, but by 1968 lake water quality was still diminishing. Citizens became alarmed. At this point the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency joined with the newly organized Lake Minnetonka Conservation District to commission a study of lake pollution. Entitled "A Program for Preserving the Quality of Lake Minnetonka", the "Harza Study" (as it will be referred to hereafter) found that this nutrient input, particularly phosphorus, was being generated from two principal sources: the seven municipal sewage treatment plants; and urban stormwater runoff coming from within the watershed. The first pollution source, nutrient rich effluent outflowing from the municipal sewage treatment plants, was systematically eliminated during the late 1970's and early 1980's by multi-million dollar construction of sewer interceptors designed to remove effluent from the watershed. But stormwater runoff is a different matter. Compared to point -source sewage pollution, the collection and treatment of non- point source stormwater runoff is relatively difficult, costly, and often impractical. Lake Minnetonka is fed by neither spring nor tributary. The sole replenishment comes from storm water runoff from the watershed, of which over one-third flows from or through Orono. Lake Minnetonka, second only to Lake Michigan in this region, has an extremely long 25 -year flush -out period. This means that careful and continuous attention must be given to the quality of runoff into the Lake. The various studies conducted in the 1960's and 1970's recommended that lakeshore density be limited and that the natural system of wetlands and marshes be forever protected and preserved as the only practical, economic method of filtering nutrients from storm water runoff. Implementation of density limitations relies on breaking the "Urbanization Spiral", the development paradox that results from providing urban -level municipal services for new development. The paradox is that if municipal services are extended into rural zones, the cost of these services taxes the land to the point that higher density development is required. Particularly in the case of sewers, even if extended to City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 1, Page 3 CMP Part 1. Introduction existing pockets of development "to solve a pollution problem", inflation, topography and sparse settlement combine to increase costs. Such costs can be paid only by increasing development densities, which in turn cause increasing levels of storm water nutrient pollution. This spiral results in even greater levels of pollution than the original sewage 'problem' might have been. For example, Eugene Hickock's 1973 Storm Water Impact Statement for the Metropolitan Council identified up to 10 times more phosphorus alone from urban storm water runoff than from Orono's low-density rural land use. In response to the above concerns, Orono became a nationally recognized leader in espousing environmental protection. Land use planning since the 1950's has stressed the environmental advantages of low density development. Shorelands, wetlands and natural drainage systems have been preserved by tradition and by ordinance. Comprehensive planning was underway by the mid-1960s. In 1974, the first published Plan, as approved by the Metropolitan Council, established as its foremost guiding principle the protection and preservation of Lake Minnetonka and its associated wetlands. The 1980 Community Management Plan and its subsequent 2000-2020 update reinforced these principles and have served as the basis for management of development in Orono for the past three decades. LAKE POLLUTION NON -POINT SOURCE INCREASED HARD COVER MORE RUN-OFF MORE POLLUTANTS FROM LAKE POLLUTION LAWN- FERTILIZATION. POINT SOURCE 9 VEHICLE EXHAUST IMMINE SOU OE-ICEING AND SfiREET HEALTH HAZARD SWEEPING ALTERNATIVES STUDIED SEWER EXTENSION ORDERED LAND SUBDIVISION TO SPftEA6 UNIT COSTS OF ASSESS- MENTS IPROPERTY ASSESSMENTS POSE FINANCIAL BURDEN DUE TO SPECIAL CONSTRUC- TION IN WETLAND TERRAIN, LARGE LOT ACREAGE AND SCATTERED DEVELOPMENT Figure 1-1: The Urbanization Spiral Illustrates the development paradox that faces Orono if municipal services are extended into rural areas. Orono has consistently made the decision to limit the extension of urban services into rural areas. The combination of low density residential development, establishment of privately owned and maintained roads, and use of septic systems and wells has provided Orono with unique and sustainable neighborhoods that are not only self-sufficient but collectively have a low environmental impact. Enforcement of the policies necessary to create and maintain these rural neighborhoods has been consistent and effective. Today, Orono still faces the same issues as other outlying communities, although Orono is no longer the 'outer ring' that it was 20-30 years ago. Development pressures continue as speculators view our remaining open spaces seeking to put them to a "highest and best use". The Metropolitan Council has recognized an City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 1, Page 4 CMP Part 1. Introduction urgency to curtail "Urban Sprawl" by making more efficient use of the remaining undeveloped land within the 7 -county Metro area. Yet Orono has an obligation to its residents, both those who live on the Lake and those who reside in the rural area, to preserve these two complementary lifestyles. Orono accepts its obligation to the citizens of Minnesota who treasure Lake Minnetonka as a unique and valuable natural resource and who expect it to remain in a usable condition. Orono's ongoing plan to preserve the watershed of Lake Minnetonka is sound, environmentally correct, and in step with regional planning for metropolitan needs. COMMUNITY MANA GEMENT PLAN OR GANIZA TION This document has been divided into six parts in order to make it more readable and understandable to citizens and other interested parties: Part 1 forms a brief introduction and overview of planning concerns. Part 2 provides a foundation for Orono's plan - the history, community philosophy and general goals and policies that have shaped and will continue to guide Orono's planning strategy. Part 3 encompasses Orono's Land Use Plan, defining how Orono will develop in the coining two decades, and defining Orono's housing and environmental protection programs. Part 4 contains detailed plans for how Orono will provide a balanced and appropriate level of public facilities and services, addressing transportation systems, sewer and water facilities, parks and open spaces, and the broad range of community services such as public safety, education, private utility and communications systems. Part 5 contains a brief description of ordinances and programs for implementation of the Plan, and expresses the City's commitment to coordination of services and programs with surrounding municipalities as well as other governmental agencies. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 1, Page 5 2040 Comprehensive Plan Regional Location Map^^ BOLTON ti M & MENK ,may Orono, MN February 2018 s' Real People. Real Solutions. 41 Wright Co Sherburne Co Sibley Co Le Sueur Co Legend e de St. Paul & Minneapolis Metro Counties Other Counties 0 10 Miles Source: MnGeo nepin Co wMWV Scott Co Isanti Co Ramsey Co St. eaPaul Minnpolis Rice Co Chisago Co Washington Co Z71 Goodhue Co ap 1-1 CMP Part 2. Community Management Plan Foundation TABLE OF CONTENTS CMP PART 2 COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOUNDATION Community Historical Background............................................................................. 2-1 Table 2-1: Important Dates in Orono's History Community Demographic Profile 2-5 Chart2-1: Population............................................................................................................ 2-5 Table 2-2: Orono Population, Households, & Employment.......................................2-6 Table 2-3: Population Changes in Surrounding Communities ................................. 2-6 Table2-4: Household Trends........................................................................................2-7 Table 2-5: Population by Age.......................................................................................2-7 Table 2-6: Households by Current Age of Householder.............................................2-8 Table 2-7: Household Income Ranges.......................................................................2-8 CommunityPhilosophy..............................................................................................2-9 Community Goals and Policies.................................................................................2-12 Comprehensive Planning Strategy............................................................................2-19 City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 2, Page 1 CMP Part 2. Community Management Plan Foundation CMP PART 2 COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOUNDATION HISTORICAL BACKGROUND Every community has a unique character arising from its location, natural resources, history and population. Orono is no exception to this rule. But Orono's plan for the future may be exceptional, because its basic premise is the maintenance and furtherance of our very own unique features. Orono's corporate history dates to 1858 when Minnesota became a state, and western Hennepin County was surveyed and divided into townships. All of Orono south of Watertown Road was located in Excelsior Township, with the area north of Watertown Road being located in Medina Township. But the citizens of Orono, few as they were, found the going difficult in having to negotiate the lake in order to transact business in far away Excelsior. So, in 1868, the townships were realigned with everything north of the Narrows becoming part of Medina. The separate Township of Orono was created out of the southern half of Medina on April 9, 1889. The name Orono was brought to the area by Major George Brackett, a native of Orono, Maine, who first used it to designate the area now known as Brackett's Point. Orono Township once included areas now part of neighboring cities. Minnetonka Beach was incorporated out of Medina Township in 1884. Long Lake was incorporated from Orono Township in 1906. Long Lake expanded, Wayzata grew westward, and then Spring Park was incorporated in 1952. Finally, effective January 1, 1955, Orono Village was incorporated encompassing all the remaining parts of the township including the settlements of Navarre, Crystal Bay, Orono and Bederwood (Stubbs Bay). A number of minor boundary changes have occurred since then, including detachment of the tip of Three Points Peninsula to Mound in 1963; annexation of small strip from Minnetrista in 1980 for McCulley Road; detachment of the Fleming Trail Addition to Long Lake in 1993; and annexation of property along North Ferndale and West Ferndale Roads from Wayzata in 1994 in exchange for detachment of a property along Highway 12 to accommodate Wayzata's public works facilities. The history of Orono's development is one of conversions: conversion of the Lake Minnetonka shoreline from Big Woods to summer homes in the late 1800's and early 1900's, a second conversion from lakeshore summer homes to year round residences since WWII; and conversion of the off -lake woods and prairie openings into farmland in the 19th century, with a more recent conversion from farms to low-density residential homesites beginning in the 1950's. Orono's first Township zoning regulations were adopted in 1950, and grew progressively more strict through the next two decades. Several residential and commercial zones were initially established, requiring minimum lot area and width standards, and defining allowable uses. The first wetland protection ordinance was established in 1963, about the same time that municipal sewers were first provided to the Navarre area. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 2, Page 3 CMP Part 2. Community Management Plan Foundation Perhaps the single most important event that has shaped Orono's development in the last half -century was the City-wide rezoning in 1975. Much of the City had been zoned for residential development with 1 -acre lots by 1967, with most of the Navarre area around Lake Minnetonka being zoned 1/2 -acre, and a few areas in northeast Orono requiring 1-1/2 or 2 -acre lot sizes. The 1975 rezoning took into account two important factors. First, that creating and maintaining a low density of development in the watershed is critical to preserving Lake Minnetonka; and second, that lots must be large enough to accommodate on- site sewage treatment systems on a permanent basis, due to the high cost of sewering and the "urbanization spiral". As a result, the 1975 rezoning established a minimum lot size of 2 acres (or 5 acres in northwest Orono) for 80% of Orono's land area. This had a dramatic effect not only in slowing development, but in effect capping the City's ultimate potential population at around 10,000 rather than the 30-40,000 that had been predicted under typical suburban development scenarios. Purposely Left Blank City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 2, Page 4 CMP Part 2. Community Management Plan Foundation Table 2-1: IMPORTANT DATES IN ORONO HISTORY 1803 The Louisiana Purchase: U.S. acquires 828,000 square miles of land from France for about 3C an acre 1822 W. J. Snelling and Joe Brown explore the upper reaches of Minnehaha Creek and sight Lake Minnetonka 1851 Treaty of Traverse des Sioux opens lands west of Mississippi for settlement; ratified by U.S. Senate in 1852 1852 Hennepin County organized; first township surveys conducted 1853 First settlers arrive in what is now Orono: Rev. Stephen Hull at 'The Narrows'; Stephen Bean of Maine at north shore of Stubbs Bay; John Carman at Spring Park; James and Francis Maxwell on Maxwell Bay. 1855 Arrival of many settlers in the Orono and Long Lake area: David Lydiard, Eleazer Dickey and Miles Bayer, all of Nova Scotia; the Edwin Turnham and George Maxwell families settle in Medina; the French, Fox and Fogelman families bring first horses to region; John Carman filed first subdivision in Orono, "Town of Tazaska" for land lying between North Arm, Forest Lake, West Arm and Crystal Bay, on May 3, 1855 1856 First sawmill in Orono on the Watertown Road, erected by Long Lake founder George Knettle; 'Tamarack' Post Office begun at home of Henry Stubbs; first stageline extended through Orono to Irvin Shrewsbury's corner in Independence 1858 Minnesota becomes 32nd state 1860 The Governor Ramsey, built by Charles Galpin, becomes first steamboat on Lake Minnetonka; many area roads surveyed by B.F. Christlieb, including "Harrington Road" (now Ferndale Road); final year that Chief Shakopee and his band of Sisseton Dakota winter at Teepee Hill (Union Cemetery ). 1861 Union Cemetery Association formed 1863 First church in area, Presbyterian Church of Medina, formed in the Old North (Lydiard) School, near Wolsfeld Lake. 1868 Railroad reaches Long Lake; land on north shore of Lake Minnetonka annexed from Excelsior township to Medina township 1870 Joel Stubbs patents sorghum processing unit, replacing wheat as major crop for a decade 1873 First dredging and widening of 'Hull's Narrows' opens upper lake for navigation 1880 George A. Brackett purchases 'Starvation Point' from Nathan Stubbs, renames it'Orono Point' after boyhood home in Maine; Saga Hill colony begun on north shore of North Arm 1882 James J. Hill's spur line to Minnetonka Beach opens in conjunction with grand opening of Hotel Lafayette in June, 1882, helping to make Lake Minnetonka an internationally known resort destination; development grew up around the railroad stops such as Crystal Bay and Navarre 1884 Areas of Minnetonka Beach, Navarre and Spring Park added to Medina Township 1889 Town of Orono formed from parts of Medina and Excelsior Townships 1894 Village of Minnetonka Beach formed 1898 Formation of Minnetonka Fruit Growers Association 1906 Village of Long Lake incorporated, first telephone lines begun City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 2, Page 5 CMP Part 2. Community Management Plan Foundation 1906 New Orono town hall constructed in Crystal Bay 1913 New library begun at Long Lake Bank 1917 St. George Catholic Church founded 1923 Leo Feser begins building Orono Golf Course 1932 Trinity Lutheran Church formed 1930's Drought hits midwest, Lake Minnetonka level drops 6 feet 1950 First Orono Township Zoning Ordinances adopted 1951 Village of Spring Park incorporated 1955 Orono becomes an incorporated village 1963 Orono sewer plant constructed near French Lake, Navarre area provided with municipal sewers 1965 May 6 - Tornado devastates parts of Orono, Navarre hard hit 1970 Navarre municipal water system constructed 1974 Orono becomes a city; new zoning ordinances enacted to maintain low density development ca. 1973 U.S. Highway 12 freeway section extended to Orono's eastern border 1980 Orono sewer plant decommissioned, replaced by Metro interceptor transporting Orono's wastewater to Blue Lake Treatment Plant in Shakopee 1981 McCulley Road Ring Route opens to traffic providing an alternative to County Road 15 for east -west traffic 1989 Orono commemorates its Centennial Year 1992 Orono municipal offices, police, and public works relocated to new complex on Old Crystal Bay Road North across from Orono Schools 2000 Question of proposed consolidation with City of Long Lake receives positive response from Orono voters but fails in Long Lake 2000 William and Susan Lurton donate 39 acres for Passive, natural environmental park. 2001 City Council approves Orono Woods Senior Housing, creates first Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District 2006 Orono acquires Big Island Veterans Camp 2006 Navarre Fire Station 2 added 2008 Completion of new Highway 12 "Super 2" segment from Orono's eastern border to County Road 6 2015 Lakeview Golf Course redeveloped as residential development 2015 City expands Hackberry Park as part of a living trust with the Gleason Family 2016 Dayton property, one of the last Big Woods parcels, develops as estate residential. Sources: Excerpts from "Orono, Minnesota 1889-1989: 100 Years By the Waters of Minnetonka" edited by James R. Roehl, Excerpts from "Picturesque Minnetonka " published by Excelsior -Lake Minnetonka Historical Society, 1976, City files. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 2, Page 6 CMP Part 2. Community Management Plan Foundation COMMUNITYDEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE The population of Orono was estimated by the Met Council in 2016 as 7,691. This represents an increase of 254 people since 2010. Total number of households was estimated to be 3,037 in 2016, and increase from the 2,826 households reported in 2010. The persons per household has decreased steadily since 1970, then a high of 3.43 persons per household to 2.529 estimated now. The following Cehart 2-1 illustrates Orono's relatively rapid growth during the period 1920-1950 (averaging around 60% per decade); a decline in the rate of growth from 1950 to 1970 (slowing to 20% per decade); and relatively slow growth since 1970 (less than 5% per decade). This slow rate of growth is expected to continue for the next 20 years based on the City's current zoning and planned land use and the amount of undeveloped property. Orono is primarily a bedroom community, with 70% of its land area guided for residential use. Annual population increases over the last 30 years have averaged less than 1% per year. Table 2-2 shows this growth in Households, Population, and Employment since 1970. Chart 2-1 10000 9000 8000 7000 6000 5000 4000 3000 2000 1000 Population � GYIIfi �IeI1Zi f.'i [1� �%7.Y1� GI.'I1� L'fL1 � �%�I� �!Z:II��IZIZI�, 11y CI�i1f�1��I��If, ZIZ ili est. est. est. Sources: U.S. Census 1920-2000; Met Council Systems Statement Forecasts 2010-2040 City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 2, Page 7 CMP Part 2. Community Management Plan Foundation Table 2-2: Orono Population, Households, & Employment 1970 - 2040 Year 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 Population 6,787 6,845 7,285 7,538 7,437 8,100 8,800 9,500 Households 1,976 2,291 2,613 2,766 2,826 3,200 3,560 3,900 Persons per Household 3.43 2.99 2.79 2.73 2.63 2.53 2.47 2.44 Employment 500 809 980 951 1,562 1,700 1,780 1,800 _Source: U.S. Census, Metropolitan Council; City Estimates of Emplaym Surrounding communities have undergone varied rates of population increase in recent decades, as shown in Table 2-3. Among cities that have a smaller geographic area that has been developed for many years (Long Lake, Mound, Spring Park, Tonka Bay, Wayzata) the population increase over the period 1970- 2010 has been relatively small, ranging from 0%-20%, with Spring Park being the anomaly in that it grew by nearly 54%, due to the construction of many multi -family housing units. Among those cities that have a larger geographic area approaching township size, the population increase for Independence, Minnetrista, & Medina was approximately 77 to 122%, with Plymouth and Orono at opposite ends of a much wider range. While Plymouth more than quadrupled its population over 30 years, Orono's increased by only 10%. Table 2-3: Population Change in Surrounding Communities 1960-2000 COMMUNITY 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Percentage Increase 2000- 2010 Percentage Increase 1970- 2010 Independence 1,446 1,993 2,640 2,822 3,236 3,524 9% 77% Long Lake 996 1,506 1,747 1,984 1,842 1,780 -3% 18% Medina 1,472 2,396 2,623 3,096 4,005 4,903 22% 105% Minnetonka Beach 544 586 575 573 614 522 -15% -11% Minnetrista 2,211 2,878 3,236 3,439 4,358 6,384 46% 122% Mound 5,440 7,572 9,280 9,634 9,435 9,045 4% 19% Orono 5,643 6,787 6,845 7,285 7,538 7,437 -1% 10% Plymouth 9,576 18,077 31,615 50,889 65,894 70,720 7% 291% Spring Park 668 1,087 1,465 1,571 1,717 1,674 -3% 54% Tonka Bay 1,204 1,397 1,354 1,472 1,547 1,486 -4% 6% Wayzata 3,219 3,700 3,621 3,806 4,113 3,692 -10% 0% City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 2, Page 8 CMP Part 2. Community Management Plan Foundation Table 2-4 illustrates that household sizes have been decreasing steadily since 1970, to an anticipated level of 2.44 in 2040. , while the annual growth in the number of households has r-emained relatively low level of appf:oxiffia4ely 2.40 pefsofls pef household by 2020. The nuffiber- of households has ifler-eased signifieantly dur-ing the period 2000 2010, r-efleeting Or-ofto's eommitment to pr-oviding a wider- range o housing optiefis, Table 2-4: Household Trends Year Households Percent Change in Households Household growth Household Size (persons per household) 1970 1976 ---- 3.43 1980 2291 15.94% 315 2.99 1990 2613 14.05% 322 2.79 2000 2763 5.74% 150 2.73 2010 2862 3.58% 99 2.63 2020 (Est.) 3200 11.81% 338 2.53 2030 (Est.) 3560 11.25% 360 2.47 2040 (Est.) 1 3900 9.55% 1 340 2.44 Sources: 1970-2010 US Census Data; City records; Met Council forecasts City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 2, Page 9 CMP Part 2. Community Management Plan Foundation Population by Ate Table 2-5 indicates the range in ages of Orono's population in 1990, 2000, and 2010. The Table also includes the Metropolitan Area's age breakdown in 2010. The average age in 1990 was 35 years with the median age being slightly higher at 36 years. As of the 2000 US Census, the median age had climbed substantially to 40.7 years, as compared to 34.2 years for the Twin Cities area. Table 2-5: Orono Population by Age, 1990, 2000 and 2010 Age Range 1990 Percentage 2000 Percentage 2010 Percentage Twin Cities MSA 0-4 484 6.60% 453 6.00% 344 4.63% 4.57% 5-9 549 7.50% 577 7.70% 580 7.80% 7.39% 10-14 542 7.40% 639 8.50% 664 8.93% 6.92% 15-19 487 6.70% 543 7.20% 532 7.15% 6.93% 20-24 302 4.10% 187 2.50% 181 2.43% 6.80% 25-34 978 13.40% 597 7.90% 400 5.38% 14.49% 35-44 1483 20.30% 1414 18.80% 914 12.29% 13.70% 45-54 1199 16.50% 1578 20.90% 1559 20.96% 14.66% 55-64 643 8.90% 874 11.60% 1323 17.79% 12.42% 65-74 408 5.60% 420 5.60% 587 7.89% 6.67% 75-84 162 2.20% 206 2.70% 269 3.62% 3.30% 85+ 48 0.70% 50 0.70% 84 1.13% 1.12% 7,285 7,538 71437 Sources: 1990 & 2000 U.S. Census, Metropolitan Council 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 0-4 Population by Age 5-9 10-14 15-19 20-24 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 75-84 85+ ■ 1990 2000 2010 City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 2, Page 10 CMP Part 2. Community Management Plan Foundation In 2010, Orono's median household income was $111,000 compared to that of the seven county metro area ($65,200), as shown in Table 2-7. In 2016, the gap widened, $119,400 to $70,900. Table 2-7: Median Household Income Orono 7 County Region 1990 Census $ 62,900.000 $ 36,600.00 2000 Census $ 88,300.000 $ 54,300.00 ACS 2006-2010 $ 111,000.000 $ 65,200.00 ACS 2012-2016 $ 119,400.000 $ 70,900.00 Source: US Census and American Community Survey COMMUNITY PHILOSOPHY Orono's Community Management Plan is a statement by the citizens as to what we are, where we have been, and where we are going. Orono will retain its own special identity through careful growth management in the best interest of the environment, the natural resources, the watershed of Lake Minnetonka and the community of citizens, both present and future. Orono's past growth and development patterns have been greatly influenced by the extensive and varied natural features found within our borders. Map -Map 3B -2a in the Land Use Section of this Plan -5 indicates the pattern of land use as it exists today. It is apparent that development has been drawn by the lakes and clustered by the many bays and marshes. The most significant resource is Lake Minnetonka. The largest lake in the metropolitan Twin Cities area, Minnetonka has 22.4 square miles of surface area and approximately 130 miles of shoreline running along numerous bays, channels and inlets. Lake Minnetonka's watershed, including the Lake itself, encompasses 123 square miles, and approximately 115 of the contributing watershed lies in Orono. Orono has two distinct personalities: The historically developed lakeshore and the rural woods, fields and open spaces. Both areas are primarily residential in nature, relying upon the existing town center of Navarre and other nearby cities such as Long Lake, Spring Park, Wayzata, Mound and Maple Plain for shopping, employment, and entertainment activities. The concern of the residents is to provide for continuing maintenance and preservation of those natural resources and social amenities which attracted people to Orono in the first place. Near the lake, density of development has to be regulated in order to minimize the resultant stormwater runoff pollution which, if unrestricted, could permanently alter and destroy the ecology of this very unique resource. Away from the lake, the natural marshes and wetlands are to be protected as the primary and most practical method of storm water filtration and enhancement. Steep slopes will be protected from over -development and erosion. Woodlands will be preserved as wildlife habitat, erosion protection, noise barriers and places for personal solitude and contentment. Orono's primary goal of preserving the water quality and level of Lake Minnetonka can only be accomplished by maintaining the basic integrity of the natural watershed. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 2, Page 11 CMP Part 2. Community Management Plan Foundation Open space is to be cherished and protected. In urbanized areas, recreational needs go hand-in-hand with the necessities of light, air, and solar access. Views of the lakeshore are invaluable property rights and personal experiences. In rural areas, the open fields and pastures are witness to the rural lifestyles active in Orono, and each property owner has the ability to provide for his own varied recreational needs. Institutional and commercial needs have been met by the existing centers with no need for future expansion. The geographic relationships between the many lake area communities expand the services available to Orono residents beyond the City's borders. The many industrial, retail -commercial and health care facilities readily accessible locally and regionally are adequate to serve the needs of Orono residents. School populations are increasing slowly, and new technologies and program demands require some expansion of existing facilities but no new centers. Orono's population growth has been historically slow, allowing for gradual service increases and fiscal security. Public facilities have been provided and will continue to be improved at a level sufficient for protection of health and safety, but unobtrusively enough to allow continued self- independence and maintenance of rural lifestyles. The basic philosophies of the CMP are to the extent possible consistent with the policies and guidelines contained in the Metropolitan Council's 112040 Regional Development Framework". Future urban density in the urban area along the lake is to be in -fill development where existing urban services are available. Rural land use in the low-density residential lakeshore areas and in the area away from the lake, is to be free from expanded urban services except when necessary to protect the public health or to eliminate negative impacts to surface and groundwaters. In all neighborhoods, provisions are made for protection of environmental assets and for provision of open space and recreational amenities. Housing opportunities in and near Orono are available in a wide range of alternatives consistent with the availability of public services. Existing and planned sewer and transportation facilities are capable of servicing the planned density of development, and land use patterns are consistent with and complementary to those of neighboring cities. Orono's managed growth policy means that the need to use and enjoy Lake Minnetonka will be balanced with protection of its water quality and accessibility for future generations. This policy means that the acceptance of growth and development changes will be balanced with conservation of our resources and natural amenities, and maintenance of our small town social character. Orono intends to remain two communities in one. The historically developed area around and near the Lake Minnetonka shoreline has been called "Urban" because of historic developed density with lots typically one acre in area or smaller and the availability of a limited level of urban services. The area away from the Lake has been termed "Rural" because of the lack of density, the abundance of open space and the citizens' commitment to maintain this type of development. The majority of Orono's 'Rural Area' has been zoned to require a minimum of 2 acres of dry buildable land per residential lot, with an area in the northwest corner of the City requiring at least 5 dry buildable acres. When wetlands and roads are factored in, nearly 80% of the City's land will be developed at densities averaging from approximately 1 unit per 3 gross acres up -to 1 unit per 7 gross acres, sufficient to meet the City's environmental protection goals. The Metropolitan Urban Service Area ("MUSA") was established by Metropolitan Council to define the extent of areas where urban services will be provided and urban scale development will occur. As part of its Metro 2040 Regional Growth Strategy developed in 1996, Metropolitan Council for discussion purposes suggested that all but the northwestern tip of Orono will be in the MUSA by 2020. However, the City Council in the City's 2000-2020 CMP included a much smaller area within the MUSA (Main -4C 2) to be consistent with the extent of City -planned municipal sewer extensions, and to be consistent with the City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 2, Page 12 CMP Part 2. Community Management Plan Foundation development plans of our neighboring municipalities. Map 313-1-2in the Land Use Chapter depicts Orono's defined "Urban" areas (where zoning density will range from 1 unit per acre to as many as 250 units per acre) and its "Rural" areas (where ultimate developed density will range from 1 unit per 5 acres to I unit per 2 acres). Orono's 2010-2030 MUSA as approved by Met Council in 2008 reflect a clear intent to bring municipal sewer to lakeshore and shoreland areas where needed, as well as to existing concentrations of population where septic systems may not be suitable for the long-term. But most of all, Orono citizens have located the MUSA line and have defined the urban and rural areas to be consistent with their plans for permanent use and development of the City. COMMUNITY GOALS AND POLICIES The goals and policies of this plan have met the test of time in Orono. The basic premise of maintaining distinct urban and rural neighborhoods continues a hundred -year tradition. The commitment to environmental preservation remains uppermost in the list of priorities of Orono's residents. The inter - reliance of lake area communities for shopping and commercial needs, for housing variety and for provision of basic public services is both historic and economically practical. The following goals and policies reflect the basic philosophies of Orono. Goals and policies affecting the entire City are grouped in an "overall" category. In addition, more detailed goals and policies are separated under their appropriate "urban" or "rural" classification. Finally, each separate CMP chapter has detailed goals and policies relating to that particular subject. GENERAL GOALS AND POLICIES Orono's Planning Goals 1. The foremost guiding principle and goal of Orono's planning is to protect and preserve Lake Minnetonka, and all Lakes and natural resources, its water quality, and its recreational assets. This goal continues a commitment established half a century ago. It includes preservation of the associated marshes, wetlands and natural drainageways as the primary, most practical and cost efficient method of preventing flooding and of filtering out the nutrient pollution from stormwater runoff. Maintaining a low-density rural area away from the lake, and managing the quality of runoff that flows directly to the lake, are important elements of this goal. 2. To retain the existing urban -rural land use pattern on a permanent basis. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 2, Page 13 CMP Part 2. Community Management Plan Foundation 3. To maintain our local character and identity. This local character is defined by strong neighborhoods, preponderance of wildlife, open spaces, lakes, and wetlands. 4. To protect and preserve our many natural resources including all lakes, creeks, marshes, wetlands, woodlands, groundwater and steep slopes. 5. To preserve open space, light, air, and solar access for all citizens while maintaining night sky. 6. To protect the general public health, safety and welfare through the development of ordinances, policies, and infrastructure that provides safe, efficient streets and neighborhoods, transportation alternatives, parks and opens spaces. To guide investment and reinvestment in the City at densities consistent with environmental protection and the planned land use pattern. The city's focus is in development and redevelopment is preservation of established character, rather than the creation of a new character. 8. To protect the financial stability of the City, providing an adequate level of services at efficient cost to the taxpayer. Orono's Planning Policies 1. Future development will be guided to protect and enhance the Lake Minnetonka watershed. Lake Minnetonka has local and regional significance as a vital ingredient in human experience and in the quality of life of all Orono residents. No development will be permitted that would have a detrimental effect on the Lake. 2. Urbanization will not be expanded into the existing rural areas. Orono's Community Management Plan is not a staged growth plan, and therefore the Urban area will not be expanded into the Rural Area. Urban services will not be expanded into the Rural Area except when necessary to protect the public health, or to avoid or eliminate negative impacts to surface and groundwaters. 3. The existing and planned Urban Area is fixed. Orono's Urban Area is fixed by the various elements of the Community Management Plan, and is shown on Map 3B-12. 4. The boundary between Orono's Urban and Rural areas is not strictly defined by the MUSA boundary. The boundary between Orono's Urban and Rural areas is defined by the density of development and level of public services intended to be provided. Orono will not define its Urban and Rural areas based merely on whether municipal sewer is provided. The MUSA boundary has been amended by the City in the past to allow for retrofitting of existing Rural Area neighborhoods with municipal sewer, to solve existing sewage treatment problems. In these areas, the zoning has not changed to allow for additional development at urban densities, and urban services other than sewer have not been provided. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 2, Page 14 CMP Part 2. Community Management Plan Foundation 5. Future expansions of the sewer system into the Rural Area to solve existing neighborhood sewage treatment problems or along the lakeshore to avoid or eliminate potential negative impacts on lake water quality will not result in a reclassification of those neighborhoods from Rural to Urban. Expansion of the sewer system into the Rural Area will not result in the provision of additional urban services, nor will it result in changes to allowed development densities. 6. Additional urban development will occur only in the designated Urban Area. Additional urban development will occur in the urbanized areas consistent with the capacities of the existing urban services and at limited densities consistent with all environmental constraints. 7. Additional rural development will occur in the designated Rural Area. Additional rural residential and quasi -agricultural development can occur in the rural areas without taxing the limited capacities of existing rural services. Rural development will occur at limited densities consistent with self-supporting on-site sewer and water services and with maintenance of natural amenities, open space and other rural community characteristics. 8. Natural features and sensitive environments will be protected by ordinances based upon extensive inventory, analysis and established environmental protection guidelines. Natural resource information will be used and evaluated in review of all significant land use developments. Ordinance provisions will be reasonably established, fairly interpreted and strictly enforced. 9. Historically significant buildings, places and settings will be identified and preserved. The character of Orono receives much of its identity from our unique pattern of development. Individual sites provide a glimpse into the past and are a valuable addition to Orono Character. These sites include the Orono Golf Course, and the Pillsbury Summer House. Programs will be established to identify and help preserve this heritage for future generations. Where necessary, special consideration will be made to encourage retention of significant public or private amenities. 10. Housing programs will be pursued to provide safe, affordable homes for all citizens. Housing opportunities will be provided for citizens of all ages and income levels either within Orono or within the adjacent town centers of Long Lake and Spring Park where the necessary support services for a wider range of housing opportunities are readily available. Rehabilitation programs will be identified and stressed to increase the livability and energy efficiency of the existing housing stock. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 2, Page 15 CMP Part 2. Community Management Plan Foundation 11. Transportation facilities will be provided and improved consistent with local service needs and with a coordinated program of area -wide transportation priorities. Transportation planning will be sensitive to local land use and environmental concerns, and to local service needs. Through traffic adds significant traffic level through limited corridors through the lake region. The city will encourage its transportation partners to develop and implement improvements and transportation alternatives to ensure safe and efficient travel. Levels of maintenance will vary between urban and rural areas. Alternative routings and alternative transportation modes will be explored. 12. Programs and services will be coordinated between the many interrelated governmental agencies. Orono will continue to pursue coordinated services with the County, with adjacent municipalities, with the school districts and with specialized districts such as lake conservation, watershed or joint powers districts, all for the purpose of providing consistent, high quality services at affordable cost to the taxpayer. 13. Orono strives to establish a low profile governmental presence emphasizing individual citizen responsibility rather than over- inclusive governmental authority. Orono recognizes that the individual citizen often can do for himself more quickly, efficiently and at lesser cost, things that in other areas are left to government by default. It is here that the strength of the Orono citizens has its most direct benefit in maintaining our rural, small-town vitality. 14. Orono will continue to emphasize active citizen participation in policy formation and policy administration. Local meetings have always had the friendly, open-door characteristic of New England Town Meetings. Communication with the residents, both on general matters and on specific neighborhood development proposals, will continue to be a priority policy of this Plan and of this City. Education will continue to be a critical element in establishment and administration of City policies. 15. It is Orono's firm conviction that the goals, policies and programs outlined in this CMP undeniably in the best interests of all Orono citizens, both current and future. This Plan emphasizes full use of existing public services and facilities without leap -frog expansion of unnecessary services into Orono's rural areas. This Plan reinforces the national concern for energy conservation through retrofitting and rehabilitation of existing structures, through coordinated transportation planning and through emphasis on natural rather than mechanical solutions to storm water and waste water treatment. This Plan emphasizes reliance on and efficient use of natural features and existing services rather than arbitrary duplication of efforts between competing municipalities. This Plan is built on understanding and acceptance of Orono's unique location and environmental constraints. Working with these factors will improve our quality of life; ignoring them would destroy it. This plan serves future residents of Orono through the preserve and enhancement of the uniqueness of Orono. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 2, Page 16 CMP Part 2. Community Management Plan Foundation Urban Area Goals And Policies Urban Community Goals 1. To maintain the identity and small town character of the individual neighborhoods. Urban developments will be developed to continue the architecturally diverse house pattern previously established. 2. To provide opportunities for neighborhood commerce, education and social facilities to serve Orono's urban and rural residents alike. 3. To improve the quality of life and neighborhood aesthetics while maintaining the existing diversity of housing and shopping opportunities. 4. To prevent overly dense development or any excessive demand for services which would in any way adversely affect Lake Minnetonka or its associated wetlands or drainage areas. 5. To provide municipal facilities and services at a level consistent with small town urban requirements. Urban Planning Policies 1. Future urban development will be carefully integrated into the existing neighborhoods. 2. The City will encourage commercial facilities and social centers that complement the existing available services. The city recognizes the value commercial facilities and social centers have on the quality of life for Orono residents. The City will favor those developments oriented toward local neighborhood needs, recognizing the integrated service area of all adjoining lake -area communities. 3. Private landowners and developers will be encouraged to improve the image of their neighborhoods. Programs will be pursued to encourage maintenance and upkeep of all properties and to promote the rehabilitation of older or under -used properties. Commercial areas will be encouraged to provide a coordinated approach to identity, aesthetic and neighborhood appeal. 4. Urban developments will be screened for environmental sensitivity. Most of Orono's urban neighborhoods are located very close to Lake Minnetonka; therefore any urban development has the potential for direct adverse impact on the lake. Storm water runoff control, erosion and sedimentation are particular concerns requiring careful design attention in all new urban developments. In addition, particular care will be taken to preserve open spaces, wooded areas and solar access. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 2, Page 17 CMP Part 2. Community Management Plan Foundation 5. Urban developments will be limited to the extent that they can be adequately served by the existing or planned public facilities and services. New development will not be permitted to exceed the existing or planned capacity of local roads, utilities, parks, police and fire protection. Where development within the urban area requires local extension of roads or utilities, such extension will be the full responsibility of the developer, not the general taxpayer. 6. Higher levels of public services will be provided in the urban area than in the rural area. The greater land use density and the greater number of residents combine to require more intensive levels of public services. Police, fire, and ambulance calls are more frequent. Roads, parking lots, parks, and playgrounds require more maintenance. Public sewer and water is necessary because of population density and proximity to the lake. All of these factors combine to increase the cost of government in the urban portions of the city. Rural Area Goals And Policies Rural Community Goals 1. To maintain the rural character of open spaces and closeness to the natural environment. 2. To retain the opportunity for rural commerce such as farming, orchards, greenhouses, stables and similar activities which require limited services but relatively large amounts of open space. 3. To retain the opportunity for a diversity of housing types and alternative use expectations. 4. To prevent the encroachment of urban development or any activity which would in any way adversely affect Lake Minnetonka or its associated watershed. 5. To evaluate public service requests so as to limit the financial burdens on the community and the landowners alike. Rural Planning Policies Future rural developments will be guided so as to have minimal impact on the land or on the existing rural neighborhoods. Rural developments will be permitted only at rural densities and only where the land is capable of self-supporting the necessary on-site sewer and water services. Care will be exercised to ensure that no new development encroaches upon its neighbor's open space activities. 2. Rural neighborhoods will be reserved for low-density residential and quasi - agricultural land uses. Commercial services will continue to be provided in the urban areas of Orono and adjoining municipalities. No new commercial or industrial activities will be permitted in the rural service area except those quasi -agricultural uses that do not require central sewer or other urban services. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 2, Page 18 CMP Part 2. Community Management Plan Foundation 3. Rural developments will be screened for environmental sensitivity. Most of Orono's rural land includes major or minor drainageways and wetlands all intricately tied to Lake Minnetonka. Therefore, each rural development will require particular care to prevent encroachment on these vital resources and to ensure protection of the soil vegetation and drainage patterns. In addition, consideration will be given to protection of woodlands and special open vistas having general public benefit, as well as protection and enhancement of drainageways and water quality; protection and enhancement of ecological communities; reinforcement and establishment of ecological connections throughout the City; augmentation and preservation of enclosure and buffering; preservation and improvement of views; and preservation or reinterpretation of local landmarks. 4. Rural developments will be limited to the extent that they can be served by the existing or planned public facilities and services. New development will not be permitted if it requires the extension of unplanned urban services into the rural area. Privately constructed and maintained roads and recreational facilities will be favored over requirements for additional public facilities. Buildings and structures must be located and designed for rural levels of police and fire protection. 5. Special planning considerations are required for those rural areas located on Lake Minnetonka islands. It is impossible for the City to provide island residents with normal public services such as police, fire, ambulance, sanitation or transportation. Therefore, all of these needs must be met by the individual property owners who choose to develop land on the islands. Because of this combination of factors, the City has determined that private island development must be managed in a manner that allows for private individual use of recreational property only in strict compliance with enhanced development and environmental performance standards applicable specifically to the islands. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 2, Page 19 CMP Part 2. Community Management Plan Foundation COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING STRATEGY PLANNING GOALS 1. To identify community characteristics, needs, issues and aspirations. 2. To formulate and maintain long-term goals for future community growth and management. 3. To formulate and maintain policies, ordinances and programs designed to implement the community goals. 4. To continue, rather than change, the direction of development and preservation established by previous Community Management Plans. PLANNING POLICIES 1. The CMP is designed as a management tool for city officials, staff and citizens in the conduct of both public and private activity within the city. 2. The CMP is designed to encourage effective and coordinated methods of implementation to properly balance private incentives and the protection of the public interest. 3. The CMP is designed to help coordinate the various implementation tools such as regulations, ordinances, public procedures, and public expenditures. 4. The CMP is intended to be a living document to be used on a day to day basis. 5. The CMP is intended to be reviewed, and updated when necessary. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 2, Page 20 CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS CMP PART 3A ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PLAN Environmental Protection Plan 3A-2 Table 3A-1: Lake Minnetonka Physical Statistics 3A-4 Table 3A-2: Sizes 3A-4 _Lake Table 3A-3: Streams 3A-5 Figure 3A-1_ Land Cover 3A-8 Surface Water Management Plan 3A-11 Flood plain Management 3A-13 Shoreland Management 3A-14 Table 3A-4: Solar Potential 3A-14 Figure 3A-2: Solar Potential 3A-15 Quality of Life Preservation 3A-16 Environmental Protection Policies 3A-16 Appendix Map 3A-1: Lake Minnetonka Map 3A-2: Wetlands and Drainageways Map 3A-3: Soil Associations Map 3A-4: MLCCS Level 1 Land Cover Map 3A-5: Flood Map Map 3A-6: Shoreland Overlay Appendix 3A -A Surface Water Management Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 1 CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan CMP PART 3(A) ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PLAN The presence and character of relatively undisturbed natural resource areas including lakes, marshes, wetlands, and woodlands is a major factor affecting the character of Orono. LAKE MINNETONI" Lake Minnetonka is the single most significant natural feature in Orono and in the entire western part of Hennepin County. Lake Minnetonka, as shown on Map 3A-1, is actually a series of separate lakes or "bays" interconnected by narrows or channels. The outlet of Lake Minnetonka is at Gray's Bay in the City of Minnetonka, where it discharges to Minnehaha Creek which eventually flows into the Mississippi River. ■ Lake Minnetonka has substantial public value as a recreational asset, as an environmental resource and as a setting for private residential development. ■ Lake Minnetonka is dependent upon watershed runoff for all replenishment. Lake Mipme*„P',., is of fed by aoinlet. All water is received from precipitation falling within the immediate watershed. Most of this water enters the Lake by direct runoff through a series of five major streams and their associated lakes, marshland and sub -watersheds. Lake Minnetonka's ecology makes it easily susceptible to pollution hazards. The combination of a single -source local water supply, relatively small watershed area, many channel restrictions between separate bays, and a single outlet, have resulted in Lake Minnetonka having an extremely long 25 -year flush out period for complete water change. The hazard is that once pollutants enter the Lake, they tend to remain for a long time and they are not easily diluted. ■ Lake Minnetonka has historically suffered from two problems which directly affect its environmental health and its value as a public amenity. One problem which has been worsening with urbanization trends is a deterioration in water quality caused by eutrophication. Eutrophication is the aging process by which natural waters are enriched with nutrients that may stimulate excessive plant growth, including floating algae, attached algae, and rooted weeds. Eutrophication may occur naturally, as sediments accumulate in lake basins over geologic time or it may be induced artificially as a result of human activities, as in Lake Minnetonka. Much of Lake Minnetonka has become more eutrophic during the past century, but sedimentation has been negligible. Instead, the accelerated eutrophication of the Lake, which is due to increased inputs of nutrient elements, particularly phosphorus and nitrogen, is evidenced by the increased growth of algae and weeds. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 2 CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan ■ The other problem is hydrologic instability. Because the lake level is dependent upon precipitation, wide ranges in water elevation have occurred over the years. During the 1930's, a general drought left the lake below normal level for 11 years with a maximum decline of more than 6 feet. In recent years, however, more urbanization has increased the amounts of direct storm water runoff resulting in high water levels and in some cases flooding problems for low-lying properties. Management of runoff and protection of water quality have now become primary objectives of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Map 3A-1 illustrates Lake Minnetonka's relationship with the city of Orono. The problems of Lake Minnetonka were intensively studied by many agencies in the 1960's and 19701s. These agencies included the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, the Metropolitan Council, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District and the City of Orono. The major publications addressing Minnetonka's problems and which formed the basis for the goals and policies of Orono's 1980, 2000-2020, and 2010-2030 CMPs, and this update, are as follows: 1969 Overall Plan for Water Management; MCWD 1971 "Harza Study", A Program for Preserving the Quality of Lake Minnetonka; LMCD & Mn. PCA 1973 Shoreland Management Regulations of the Mn. DNR 1973 Stormwater Impact Investigation for the Metropolitan Council 1974 Surface Water Management Plan for the City of Orono 1979 208 Water Quality Management Plan for the Metropolitan Council Orono's special involvement with Lake Minnetonka is based upon the real concerns of our affected citizens and our intimate and important impact on the total lake environment. While Orono's population is not as large as that of other municipalities in the Lake Minnetonka Watershed, Orono does have the largest land area and potential environmental impact of any local unit of government. Orono is the largest city totally within the Watershed. Orono has one-sixth of the total dry land in the watershed, one-eighth of the wetlands and one-third of the lake surface. Orono encompasses one-third of Lake Minnetonka's total shoreline. Over 30% of the total Watershed's surface runoff flows through or from Orono on its way to the Lake. No other community has the same potential as Orono for affecting Lake Minnetonka's water quality or water quantity, therefore, no other single community has as heavy a responsibility for careful protection of this general resource as Orono. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 3 CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan Table 3A-1: Lake Minnetonka Physical Statistics Lake Classification Lake Minnetonka Portion within City of % in Orono DNR MPCA Orono Impaired Water Surface Area 14,300 acres 4,750 acres 33% Shoreline Length 131 miles) 40.4 miles2 31% Watershed Area 71 sq. mi. dry land 22 sq. mi. wetlands 13.4 sq. mi. 19% 20.6 7 sq. mi. other water bodies 23 sq. mi. basin 2.7 sq. mi. 12% N of Lk. Mtka 123 sq. mi. 0.6 sq. mi. 9% 985.5' 27-140 7.4 sq. mi. 32% 89 89 4.1 sq. mi. 20% ' MCWD Water Resources Management Plan 2City calculation ORONO'S LAKES. CREEKS AND WETLANDS Other significant lakes in Orono include Long Lake, Mooney Lake, Lydiard Lake, Lake Classen and Dickey's Lake. Lydiard Lake and Dickey's Lake drain into Long Lake which flows into Long Lake Creek and eventually Tanager Lake (bay) of Lake Minnetonka. Lake Classen drains into Stubbs Bay of Lake Minnetonka and Mooney Lake drains through Plymouth and Wayzata before discharging into Wayzata Bay of Lake Minnetonka. Table 3A-2 below provides some general information on all of Orono's lakes. Table 3A-2: Lake Sizes and Shoreland Classifications Lake Classification Total Basin Basin Area in City of Orono Acres OHWL DNR MPCA Protected Waters Impaired Area Acres Inventory Number Water Natural Environment (NE) Lake Classen 117 117 974.5' 27-162 N Dickeys Lake 20.6 20.6 974.5' 27-161 N French Lake (South Basin Only) (Includes 78 ac. wetlands) 26 26 985.5' 27-140 Y Lydiard Lake 89 89 930.0' 27-159 N (Includes 20 ac. wetlands) Lake Katrina 133 26 970.9' 27-154 N (Includes 26 ac. wetlands in Orono) Recreational Development (RD) Long Lake 320 210 944.3' 27-160 N Mooney Lake 118 10 988.0' 27-134 }% Tanager Lake (Part of Lk Mtka) -74 -74 929.4' 27-149 Y General Development (GD) Forest Lake (Part of Lk Mtka) -127 1 -127 929.4' 27-133 Y City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 4 CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan Lake Minnetonka 1 14,310 1 4,750 929.4' 27-133 Y Source: City Records, DNR, MPCA Impaired waters list, 2014 Lydiard Lake is the most rural of Orono's lakes, being surrounded by heavily wooded rolling hills. Dickey's Lake has become surrounded by low density residential development over the past 30 years. Lake Classen is surrounded by orchards, woods and open fields with a handful of homes overlooking its' waters. The Orono School District maintains a nature study area and waterfowl ponds on Classen's east shore. Mooney Lake's shore is relatively undeveloped in Orono and Medina, but the lake's watershed has received growing pressures from urbanization in Plymouth, including usage conflicts, elevation concerns due to lack of a natural outlet, and urban storm water pollution inflow. Long Lake is the second largest and 2nd most actively used lake in Orono behind Lake Minnetonka. The east and west shores have been developed at rural residential densities. The north shore has mixed rural residential areas and one denser housing cluster dating from the 1930's. The south shore is bordered by the City of Long Lake and is urbanized to the same degree as much of Lake Minnetonka. Long Lake has experienced storm water problems as well as increased usage pressures. In recent years, the expansion of Carp and other fish have suspended solids, degrading water quality. The Cities of Medina, Long Lake, and Orono have agreed to study the issue. Orono also has identified a number of protected tributary streams which are subject to Shoreland regulations. These are shown in the following table: Table 3A-3: Protected Tributary Streams Tributary Name From: To: Impaire d Water Section Township Range Section Township Range Long Lake Creek 35 (Basin 160-P) 118 23 10(Basin 141-P) 117 23 N "Wolsfeld" Creek 27 (City limit) 118 23 26(Basin 160-P) 118 23 Y Tributary to Wolsfeld Creek from Holy Name Lake 26 (City limit) 118 23 27 118 23 Dickeys Lake Creek 27 (Basin 161-P) 118 23 34 (Basin 160-P) 118 23 N Stubbs Bay Creek (aka Classen Creek 32 (Basin 162-P) 118 23 5 (Basin 133-P) 117 23 N Painter's Creek 130 (Basin 154-P) 118 23 31 (City limit) 118 23 Y Source: City Records, MPCA City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 5 CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan The second most significant and most universal natural amenity in Orono is its many wetlands and marshlands comprising Lake Minnetonka's upland drainage system. Orono's nearly 1600 acres of marshland and wetlands comprise fully one-sixth of the City's land area. Map 3A-2 indicates how the marshland and drainageways are scattered throughout the City. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 6 CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan These natural ponding areas serve an integral function within the natural ecological system of Lake Minnetonka. The "Harza Study" includes quantitative data identifying how the wetland soils easily retain phosphorus, and how marsh plants take up and incorporate large amounts of nitrogen and phosphorus into their growing tissue. Thus, the marshlands are the primary pollution filters for Lake Minnetonka's surface water runoff. Since marshes and small lakes in the watershed aggregate nearly as much area as the main body of Lake Minnetonka, their potential for supplying water to the subsurface formations is appreciable. In addition, marshes provide diversity in the kinds of open space available within the region. They provide a habitat which is uniquely suited for certain birds and mammals. They can be utilized to provide storage of storm runoff with minimal disruption to their function as a habitat for wildlife and their ability to reduce the phosphorus input to the lake. Development Impacts on Wetlands. When urban development occurs, the function of the natural drainageways and filtration system is adversely affected in three ways: The speed and quantity of the storm water runoff are increased as the absorption ability of the land is eliminated with hardcover (houses, driveways, roads, etc.). This increase in the speed and quantity of storm water runoff causes the third adverse effect, which is the increase of the amount of nutrients which are contained in the storm water runoff which now has less time in the natural marsh filtration system to be purified before entering the lake. Nutrients contained in dying vegetation, lawn fertilizers, and from other urban sources are discharged into the lake faster and in greater quantities as the level of urbanization increases. (Harza Study) Orono does not rely solely on the ability of the natural filtration system of the marshes and drainageways to purify storm water so necessary for the preservation of Lake Minnetonka. Supplementary Stormwater Ponding & Alternatives. While Orono's Surface Water Management Plan adopted in 2002 places a significant emphasis on preservation of wetlands, it also provides for the establishment of supplementary stormwater management ponds to help counteract the impacts of development within the watershed. NURP (National Urban Runoff Program) pond design criteria are primarily based on the removal of suspended particles such as sand, silt, etc. Secondary design criteria enhance the capability of NURP ponds to remove other pollutants such as trace metals, hydrocarbons, nutrients (such as phosphorus) and pesticides. Phosphorus is mainly removed through biological uptake in algae and aquatic plants. When the algae die, the nutrients fall to the bottom of the pond and become part of the sediments. Ponds in the Twin Cities area designed according to NURP standards have total phosphorus removal efficiencies of 47 to 68 percent according to Walker. Possibilities for improving this include (1) increasing mean pond depth; (2) promoting infiltration; (3) promoting plug flow conditions (i.e. multiple cell ponds); (4) applying chemicals to precipitate out the orthophosphorus (alum treatments); (5) encouraging growth of certain aquatic plants; and (6) design of outlet structure to provide extended detention of large runoff events. Whether each of these enhancements can or should be incorporated is dependent on the desired level of control and other site specific conditions. Constructed wetlands have potential benefits as well as drawbacks. Additionally, the cost of constructing stormwater ponds and storm sewer systems is enormous compared to the cost of wetland preservation. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 7 CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan Vegetated buffers, green strips adjacent to hard surfaces, permeable pavements that incorporate runoff treatment features, and rain gardens are just some of the additional tools available for supplementing runoff management. Nutrient management technologies such as NURP ponds or alum treatments will give Orono an added tool to manage runoff from rural densities, but Orono will not rely solely on man-made systems for preserving water quality. ORONO'S NATURAL RESOURCES Soils Orono's land forms are highly varied as the result of four separate glacial scourings. Surface features include islands, peninsulas, narrow land bridges, the lakes, bays and marshes, and a few shallow outwash basins. The highest elevations range from about 1060 feet above mean sea level in the northern part of the City down to the normal water level of Lake Minnetonka at elevation 929.4 MSL. The soils in the City of Orono (Map 3A-3) originated from drift materials deposited by meltwaters of the glaciers. Generally, the soil types consist primarily of clay and loam materials on the uplands and organic, wet materials in the lowland areas. Consequently, the ability of each soil type to adequately accommodate development varies considerably in Orono. Careful examination of each site is needed to determine the most appropriate land use for individual properties. Map 3A-3 references 7 different classes of soils. These classes are: Group A soils have a high infiltration rate and low runoff. These soils consist of deep, well drained sands orrg avelly sands and have a high rate of water transmission. Group B soils have a moderate infiltration rate. This group consists chiefly of deep well drained soils with a moderately fine to moderately coarse texture and a moderate rate of water transmission. Group C soils have a slow infiltration rate. This group consists of soils with a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or fine textured soils and a slow rate of water transmission. Group D soils have a very slow infiltration rate and high runoff potential. This group is composed of clays that have a high shrink -swell potential, soils with a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. If a soil is placed in _group D because of a high water table it may be assigned to a dual hydrologic group: A/D, B/D, or C/D. The first letter of the pair represents the soil's group if drained and the D represents the natural condition. Orono's native vegetation is primarily woodland interspersed with localized areas of wet City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 8 CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan prairie marshlands. Northern Orono and many areas along Lake Minnetonka's shore; contain vestiges of Minnesota's Big Woods with hardwood forests of oak, maple, elm, and basswood. Much of these have been thinned into scattered stands, as shown on Map 3A-4, but major forests remain in north central and north east Orono, especially around Lydiard Lake and in the MNDNR's Wolsfeld Woods and Wood Rill nature areas. In addition, 100 year old settlements have by now added mature stands of various evergreens and other decorative trees and shrubs. Tree Preservation Policy 1. The City finds that its trees and woodlands provide numerous benefits including: soil stabilization, reduction of storm water runoff, improvement of air quality, reduction of noise pollution, protection and increase of property values, privacy, energy conservation through natural insulation, and natural habitat for birds and other wildlife. 2. It is the City's policy to preserve and protect significant trees, stands of trees and wooded buffer areas. 3. The City will study whether adoption of additional tree protection and replacement ordinances is necessary to accomplish these goals. 4. The eradication of exotic vegetation species such as buckthorn will be encouraged in all wooded areas. However, in Shoreland areas where complete removal of buckthorn may leave a relatively bare lakeshore, plans for revegetation may be required. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 9 CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan Orono's Ground Water Supplies Orono enjoys the same abundant ground water resources from the Twin Cities artesian basin as does most of the metropolitan area. In addition, our generally heavy clay soil layers near the surface have protected the ground waters from surface pollution. Most areas of the City have had no difficulty obtaining potable water supplies drawn from the Jordan aquifer with wells ranging in depth from 75 to 200 feet. Only occasional wells have had to go deeper. Land Cover Summary. In 2006, Hennepin County published the Natural Resource Inventory for Orono which his included here by reference. The land cover classification encompassed the entire incorporated area of the City (approximately 15,400 acres) of which €u4�-1/3 is open water. Artificial surfaces, which include residential areas, farmsteads, commercial lands and other areas with greater than four percent impervious surfaces, accounted for an additional 20% of Orono's total area. Forest and woodland cover combined accounted for an additional 20% of Orono, with herbaceous vegetation types (wet meadows, cattail marshes, etc.) and planted-, maintained or cultivated vegetation types (agricultural crops, hayfields, pastures) each comprising 13% of the City. The figure 3A-1 below illustrates Orono's MLCCS Level One Land Cover, as does Map 3A- 4. Herbaceous -Nq Vegetation Sparse r1sl,'.0 land 13 °r4 i -Vegetation % 0% i Woodland - 2% -Open Water 33% Forests 18°f4 - 10) ik Planted, Maintained Artificial or Cultivated - Surface Vegetation 20% 1.3% Figure 3A-1 Land cover City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 10 CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan Natural Resource Inventory Results. The Inventory identified 358 individual natural community remnants, covering a total of 2,549 acres or approximately one-fourth of Orono's land area. These included eight forest types, one woodland type, two shrubland types, four herbaceous wetland types, and one upland grassland type. Each of the remnants was categorized with regards to quality as either high, good, moderate or low. Nearly half of this acreage (1,148.2 acres) is encompassed in Maple -Basswood Forest remnants ranging in size from 0.2 acres to 113.2 acres. Oak Forests comprise 369 acres, and Lowland Hardwood Forests total 157 acres. Other forest types identified include Aspen Forest (4.4 acres); Tamarack Swamps (25.4 acres); Floodplain Forests (14.5 acres); Black Ash Swamps (56.9 acres); and Mixed Hardwood Swamp (3.1 acres). Oak Woodland/Brushland totals 38.0 acres. Shrublands identified in the inventory include Willow Swamp (30.4 acres) and Alder Swamp (2.8 acres). Herbaceous wetlands documented in the inventory include 568 acres of Cattail Marsh ranging from 0.1 acres to 106.1 acres in size; 11.9 acres of Wet Meadow; 2.5 acres of Poor Fen; and 74.2 acres of Mixed Emergent Marsh. Upland grasslands include Mesic Prairie totaling 29.3 acres. Aimrmate Orono does not benefit from aggregate (Sand/ gravel) resources in a commercially viable scale. Consequently, there are no plans to open or allow for aggregate mining within the city of Orono. ORONO AS A "RURAL OASIS" In 2005, the City of Orono commissioned DSU, Inc to quantify several goals intended to preserve the Cities Rural Oasis Identity. That study is retained as an appendix in the 2008-2030 CMP and is incorporated by reference here. The goals and guiding principles identified by that study are highlighted here: Goals Future development in Orono must achieve the following goals: Goal #1: Promote the conservation and enhancement of the quality of surface water and wetlands throughout the city, particularly Lake Minnetonka. Goal #2: Ensure the preservation and enhancement of the existing "rural character" of the city. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 11 CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan Guiding Principles In order to guarantee that future development in Orono will achieve the above goals, these "Guiding Principles" for development shall be followed in the City of Orono: Guiding Principle #1: Promote ecologically sensitive stormwater management. Applying an ecologically -based stormwater management system will improve ecosystems by reducing both reliance on manmade infrastructure and reducing downstream runoff of contaminants. Guiding Principle #2: Establish and maintain native ecological communities. Conserving and improving natural and semi -natural areas will provide wildlife habitat and support natural ecological functions (i.e. drainage, filtering, buffering, etc). Guiding Principle #3: Establish and maintain ecological connections. Creating ecological connections will enhance stormwater collection and conveyance, promote ecological and wildlife corridors, and provide recreational opportunities for residents. Guiding Principle #4: Preserve and augment corridor enclosure. Maintaining and improving the extent of roadway corridor enclosures will promote community aesthetics associated with the city's rural character. Guiding Principle #5: Preserve views. Mitigating the visual impacts of development will also preserve the aesthetic elements of the landscape. Guiding Principle #6: Preserve and maintain landmarks and unique points of local character. Preserving distinct cultural features will maintain a familiar sense of place in the community. The city, in the review of this CMP, added a 7th guiding principal: Guiding Principle #7: Continue to work to educate property owners and residents on the effects development and use a& -have on the environment and character of the community. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 12 CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT Surface Water Management Plan Introduction The City of Orono's 2018 Local Surface Water Management Plan (SWMP) attached as Appendix 3A -A is an update of the 2011 SWMP. This Surface Water Management Plan has been developed to serve as a comprehensive planning document to guide the City of Orono in conserving, protecting, and managing its surface water resources. The SWMP provides an inventory of water resource related information including the results of assessments conducted by other governmental units, both local and state. From this inventory and assessment, Orono sets forth its goals and policies and implementation program. The SWMP also seeks consistency with the goals and policies of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and with the requirements and guidance provided in the Metropolitan Council's 2040 Water Resources Management Policy Plan. Within this document additional information such as amendment procedures, subwatershed modeling, and other en _ in�g details are included. Statutory Requirements This SWMP meets the requirements detailed in Minnesota Statutes 103B and Minnesota Rules 8410, administered by the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources. Minnesota Statute 10313.201 states that the purposes of the water management programs are to: 1. Protect, preserve, and use natural surface and groundwater storage and retention systems; 2. Minimize public capital expenditures needed to correct flooding and water quality problems; 3. Identify and plan for means to effectively protect and improve surface and groundwater quality; 4. Establish more uniform local policies and official controls for surface and groundwater management; 5. Prevent erosion of soil into surface water systems; 6. Promote groundwater recharge; 7. Protect and enhance fish and wildlife habitat and water recreational facilities; and 8. Secure the other benefits associated with the proper management of surface and groundwater. This plan is also consistent with the goals and policies of the Metropolitan Council's 2040 Water Resources Management Policy Plan, and the goals, rules and management City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 13 CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan objectives of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) with whom Orono partners in its management activities. Though intended to serve Orono until 2028, this plan may be periodically amended to remain current with local practices and policies and to maintain Orono's compliance with MCWD rules and State of Minnesota laws and rules. NPDES Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit Since 2003 Orono has operated its stormwater management program under a permit issued by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). This permit is called the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4) Permit and authorizes Orono to discharge stormwater to waters of the state under certain conditions. This permit is included by reference. Under its permit coverage, Orono has implemented a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP) to addresses the MS4 Permits six minimum control measures, as listed below: 1. Public education 2. Public involvement 3. Illicit discharge detection and elimination 4. Construction site runoff control 5. Post -construction runoff control 6. Pollution prevention in municipal operations The City's SWPPP contains several Best Management Practices within each of the listed control measures. These were identified using a self-evaluation and input process with City staff. Many of the goals and policies discussed in the SWMP are directly related to requirements listed in the NPDES program. As a result, the implementation section of this plan references items listed in the City's SWPPP. City's SWPP-P Goals, Policies and Strategies The City of Orono highly values the natural resources within its jurisdiction and seeks to protect surface and groundwater storage systems, effectively manage expenditures to correct flooding and water quality problems, prevent erosion into surface waters, promote groundwater recharge, enhance wildlife habitats and water recreational facilities, and improve the water quality of all water resources. Therefore, the city established the following goals. Specific policies and implementation strategies are listed in the SWMP. 1. Maintain or improve the physical, chemical, biological, and aesthetic condition of surface water resources. 2. Develop and implement plans as necessary to reduce pollutant loads for waters that do not meet Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) as approved by the EPA. Coordinate City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 14 CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan City efforts with applicable Implementation Plans as approved by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. 3. Minimize and mitigate the impacts of urban stormwater runoff on water resources. 4. Manage and protect wetlands to maximize wetland functions and improve surface water resources. 5. Manage Subsurface Sewage Treatment Systems to ensure proper design, installation, operation, maintenance or replacement in order to eliminate health hazards or illicit discharges to water resources. Connect properties with SSTSs to city sanitary sewer as soon as feasible. 6. Manage and protect natural upland areas adjacent to surface water resources to mitigate degradation of surface waters and increase the quantity, quality and biological diversity of natural areas. 7. Protect the quality and quantity of groundwater resources. 8. Provide the public with the knowledge, skills, and motivation to protect and improve surface water and groundwater resources. Implementation Planning SWMP includes a plan for implementation water resource improvements. The plan identify potential projects in the following categories: 1. Stream and shoreline restoration projects. 2. Outlet control structure repair or replacement projects. 3. Localized storage, volume reduction, and water quality improvement sites. 4. Wetland restoration sites 5. Natural upland restoration sites. The projects included will be used for planning purposes and will require further development prior to inclusion in the City's Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The City of Orono partners with the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District in the administration of Surface water management programs. This agreement is referenced in Section 3.21 in appendix 3A -A. FLOOD PLAIN MANAGEMENT An element of surface water management addressed in the SWMP Goals is the management of flood plains and wetlands. The City of Orono originally adopted a Flood Plain Ordinance in 1970, which has City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 15 CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan since been revised and updated on a regular basis, most recently with Hennepin County's mapping revision in November, 2016. The principles of flood plain regulation go hand-in-hand with those of stormwater management. The City will be best served by retention of open land uses which would locate permanent structures and artificial obstructions in a manner that would not obstruct the passage of waters nor destroy the natural public waters, marshes and wetlands within the City. The Ordinance is compliant with the rules and regulations of the National Flood Insurance Program codified as 44 Code of Federal Regulations Parts 59--78, as amended, so as to maintain the community's eligibility in the National Flood Insurance Program. Orono's defined flood plains are depicted on Map 3A-5. SHORELAND MANAGEMENT The City of Orono in 1992 adopted a comprehensive Shoreland Management Ordinance, pursuant to the authorization and policies contained in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 103F, Minnesota Regulations Parts 6120.2500-6120.3900, and the planning and zoning enabling legislation in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462. In 2012, this ordinance was amended to better promote the public health, safety and general welfare by providing for the wise subdivision, use and development of shorelands abutting public waters that exist within the City's corporate boundaries. Orono's defined Shoreland Overlay District is depicted on Map 3A-6. SOLAR ACCESS PROTECTION Minnesota Statutes 473.859 requires that local comprehensive plans include an element for the protection and development of access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. The City of Orono will protect such access by requiring minimum standards for lot sizes, amounts of open space, yard setbacks, and maximum height of buildings for urban and rural residents. Land uses should not preclude the possible use of solar energy systems. The Metropolitan Council has estimated the City's solar potential as follows: Table 3AA Solar Potential Rooftop Gross Rooftop Generation Gross Potential Generation Potential Potential Potential (Mwh/yr) (Mwh/yr) (Mwh/yr)Z (Mwh/yr)2 14,656,623 1 442,509 1 1,465,662 1 44,251 Figure 3A-2 displays the City's Solar Suitability Analysis. Protecting solar access means protecting solar collectors (or the location of future collectors) from shading by adjacent structures or vegetation. Existing structures and buildings in the City generally do not present significant shading problems for solar energy systems and the City's promise of open, rural spaces is intended to protect that condition. Most single family attached and detached homes are one or two stories and most multi -family, commercial, and City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 16 CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan industrial buildings are three stories or less. Solar energy systems and equipment are generally a permitted use if attached to structures. The zoning ordinance provides standards for the protection and establishment of these solar energy systems. While these ordinance standards help protect solar access, it is not possible for every part of a building or lot to obtain unobstructed solar access. Mature trees, topography, and the location of structures can limit solar access. However, on most properties the rooftop of the principal building would be free of shading by adjacent structures. Therefore, the majority of property owners in the City could utilize solar energy systems, if they so desired, as a supplement or alternative to conventional fuels. It is not desired by the City of Orono to expand solar collection at the expense of clearcutting and wholescale tree removal. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 17 CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan Gross Solar Potential City of Orono, Hennepin County Figure 3A-2 D.5 f 2 3 rn�Es Gross Solar Potential (Watt-hours per Year) - High : 1277133 Not Low: 900001 _ Solar Potential under 900,000 watt-hours per year County Boundaries City and Township Boundaries Wetlands and Open Water Features Source: University of Minnesota U -Spatial Statewide Solar Raster. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 18 CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan QUALITY OF LIFE PRESERVATION Orono's primarily residential character has resulted in an environment that is relatively free from the noise pollution of major roadways, the light pollution of commercial and industrial development, and other negative impacts such as odors, vibration, toxic emissions, glare and visual clutter that are common in non-residential areas. The residents of Orono place a high value on the quality of life provided by the lack of such negative impacts. The City of Orono is committed to preserving the qualities that make Orono an attractive residential community while providing an adequate level of the necessary services, commerce and industries required to support the community. Preservation of Dark Skies A key element that adds to the quality of life in Orono is its dark night sky. The ability to view a naturally dark, star -filled sky is a precious resource as valuable as our forested landscapes and our fresh air and clean water. But this inspiring amenity can be easily lost in the presence of inappropriate and unnecessary outdoor lighting. While artificial lighting is necessary for safety and security, the quality of that lighting can have a profound effect on our night-time security and enjoyment. Night Sky Policies 1. The City finds that preservation of the night sky is an important factor in maintaining the quality of life in Orono, and that inappropriate and unnecessary outdoor lighting can lead to glare, light trespass, sky glow and other negative impacts inconsistent with dark skies. 2. Orono will encourage the use of efficient and properly designed outdoor lighting to limit the occurrence of these negative impacts while providing for the necessary levels of safety, security and visibility appropriate to the area being illuminated. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION POLICIES The Goals and Policies of this Chapter are basic to the remaining sections of the Community Management Plan. Without environmental stability, Orono's character and vitality would be lost. With environmental care and concern, Orono citizens expect their forefather's heritage to live on for generations to come. Environmental Protection Goals 1. Preserve, conserve, and enhance the water quality of Lake Minnetonka and all other lakes in Orono. 2. Expand education of the benefits and value of environmental features in Orono. 3. Preserve, conserve, and enhance the City's marshland, wetland and natural drainage system. 4. Provide for surface water management such that the City is protected from both flooding hazards and pollution hazards. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 19 CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan 5. Protect the City's ground water resources from pollution and from depletion. 6. Protect the City from air, water and noise pollution. 7. Preserve, conserve, and enhance open space, light and air, including solar access for all properties. 8. Preserve a reasonable amount of native woodlands as an integral part of Orono's heritage. 9. Protect and preserve a reasonable amount of natural wildlife habitat in woodlands and wetlands. 10. Protect the land from soil erosion and the hazards of dust and siltation. 11. Preserve greenways and open space corridors. 12. Promote conservation and enhancement of the quality of surface water and wetlands throughout Orono, particularly Lake Minnetonka. 13. Ensure the preservation and enhancement of the existing "rural character" of the city. 14. Preserve Orono's night skies and minimize light pollution. General Policies For Natural Resource Management 1. Orono will promote and support the formulation and implementation of environmental protection policies by other Lake Minnetonka area municipalities and responsible government agencies. 2 Environmental protection policies will continue to be utilized in the formation of all other goals and policies in this CMP. Orono's commitment to environmental quality is carried throughout each element in this comprehensive plan, coloring the goals, policies and implementation practices in every facet of municipal responsibility. 3. Development density will be limited to a level which will not overload the natural surface water drainage and filtration system. 4. Surface water runoff will be directed through the natural drainage system. Direct runoff into the lake will be avoided and will be prohibited whenever possible. 5. Natural drainageways will be favored over artificial storm sewers. Where storm sewers are needed, all efforts shall be taken to minimize their impacts on receiving waters. 6. The wetlands and marshlands of the city will be protected and preserved as wildlife habitats, as unique open spaces, and as the only economically practical method of flood protection and storm water runoff filtration. Orono's recently updated wetland protection ordinances in concert with the additional regulatory authority of the MCWD, the MnDNR, MnBWSR and the Corps of Engineers will continue to provide an aggressive program to retain and enhance the viability of the City'swetlands. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 20 CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan 7. Protection of the City's marshland, wetlands and drainageways shall include protection of adjoining lands and prevention of drainage, filling, dredging or wetland vegetation removal. 8. Protection of lake resources will allow reasonable access, use and enjoyment while preventing overcrowding and excessive encroachment. In conformance with MnDNR Shoreland Management regulations for Recreational Development lakes, the City will continue to prohibit overly dense development within 1,000 feet of Lake Minnetonka. In conjunction with the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District, lake use regulations will be promoted to limit excessive boat density and overuse of sensitive bays. Land use regulations will continue to be refined and enforced to provide reasonable control over building density, land alteration and lakeshore encroachment. 9. Lake shorelines will be protected from alteration. Natural vegetation in shoreland areas will be preserved insofar as practical and reasonable in order to retard surface runoff and soil erosion, and to utilize excess nutrients. The establishment and preservation of vegetated buffers along lake shorelines will be promoted and encouraged. Clearcutting of the lakeshore will continue to be prohibited. In areas of soil or wave action erosion, natural stone rip rap shoreline protection as well as bioengineering (plant -based) solutions for shoreline stabilization will be encouraged. The use of artificially constructed seawalls will be discouraged except where no other shoreline stabilization options are feasible. 10. Lake bed alterations will be discouraged because of adverse short-term and long-term effects on water quality. Dredging will be deemed appropriate in limited circumstances only where absolutely necessary to maintain existing natural riparian access permanently lost by something beyond the control of the landowner. Periodic low water conditions or the owner's desire for deeper draft watercraft are not sufficient reasons for disrupting sensitive lake beds. 11. Development or alteration of floodplains will be restricted. Most of the City's identified floodplains are located along the shoreline or within designated marshlands and will be protected by other provisions applicable to those areas. 12- Natural resource investigation will be required as part of all development proposals. This will include topographical information, soil analysis, drainage plans, vegetation plans, erosion control measures and similar site data related to each project, whether public or private. The extent of each such review will be determined by probable environmental impact. 13. On-site water retention facilities will be required as part of all residential, commercial or industrial development projects whenever necessary to maintain or improve the existing storm water runoff patterns as required by law and Ordinance. 14. Land use and development will not be permitted at the expense of environmental protection. 15. Erosion control plans and programs will be required in all land alteration projects. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 21 CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan 16. Erosion control Best Management Practices shall be applied to all land alteration projects. 17. Citizen efforts to protect and enhance the natural environment will be encouraged. The City will encourage individual citizens and private groups or organizations to be pro -active in the preservation of the environment in which they live. Activities such as reforestation, prairie and wetland restoration, buckthorn removal, minimizing use of phosphorus on lawns establishment of lakeshore buffer strips and rain gardens, lake and stream trash cleanup, and other citizen -driven efforts are an important element in Orono's commitment to environmental protection. 18. Protection and preservation of greenways and open space corridors will be considered as part of the development process. The City will strive to provide connectivity between and among natural and semi- natural open spaces. Remnant natural areas will be preserved to the greatest extent possible, and will be connected where appropriate by greenways that may incorporate water resources and larger wetland systems, semi -natural communities, and restoration of degraded natural areas. 19. New development will be required to adhere to the methods of Conservation Design in order to achieve the City's environmental protection goals. New development shall adhere to the six Guiding Principles established through the Orono Rural Oasis Study, including: ■ Promotion of ecologically sensitive stormwater management. ■ Establishment and maintenance of native ecological communities. ■ Establishment and maintenance of ecological connections. ■ Preservation and augmentation of corridor enclosures. ■ Preservation of views. ■ Preservation and maintenance of landmarks and unique points of local character. 20. Preservation of Orono's dark night skies will be promoted by encouraging the use of appropriate outdoor lighting design. Urban Area Policies for Natural Resource Management 1. Land use standards will limit the impact of urban encroachment on Lake Minnetonka. Minimum lot widths will space out docks and structural encroachments while increasing areas of natural vegetation. The City will support the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District in its ongoing efforts to limit the number of boats per property and the amount of public waters available for private docking and boat storage. 2. Retention of natural vegetation will limit the impact of urbanization as visible from the lake. Building heights will be limited to less than the typical tree height. Minimum green belts will be provided with prohibitions against clearcutting or excessive thinning of vegetation. Natural vegetation will be preserved on slopes. Retaining walls will be discouraged except when absolutely necessary to prevent erosion, in which case they will be screened with natural vegetation. Changes to the topography of lakeshore lots with the intent of creating `walkout' situations will be discouraged because such land alterations result in an unnatural lakeshore character. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 22 CMP Part 3A. Environmental Protection Plan 3. Direct runoff into the lake will be minimized. Standards regarding the amount of impervious hardcover will continue to be aggressively enforced for residential properties within 1000 feet of the shoreline. The percentage of hardcover allowed within established lakeshore setback zones shall be limited in accordance with Orono's hardcover ordinance which has been in effect in form since 1975. 4. All existing urban wetlands will be maintained and protected for surface water retention and filtration. 5. City maintenance practices will be designed to improve storm water quality, including salt use and snow storage policies. 6. A significant amount of natural woodlands and open space will be retained on each property. Retention of the natural environment requires careful siting and preservation of trees and open space on each urban property. 7. All developments will be designed to assure protection of light, air, and solar access for neighboring properties. Requirements for minimum lot size, amounts of open space, minimum yard setbacks, and maximum building heights will be designed to assure protection of these values for all urban residents. Rural Area Policies for Natural Resource Management 1. Land use standards will limit the pollution loading of rural marshes and drainageways. Rural densities will be low enough to ensure permanent reliance upon satisfactory on-site sewer and water systems where municipal sewer is not feasible and to ensure that rates of phosphorus and nitrogen generation will not adversely affect the water quality in the natural drainage system. 2. Rural land use densities will allow maximum retention of private woods and open space. Low rural densities will accommodate homesites without affecting the traditional vistas of open fields and woods. The retention of these woodlands and marshlands will then assure permanent habitat for our abundant wildlife. 3. Rural wetlands and marshland will be maintained and protected for surface water retention and filtration. 4. The City will promote farming and animal management practices designed to conserve the soil and ground water and minimize pollution. 5. Land use standards will limit the impact of rural encroachment on Orono's rural lakeshore areas. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3A, Page 23 NL ©�BO LTO N 2040 Comprehensive Plan Lake Minnetonka O & MENK Orono, MN November 2018 Real People. Real Solutions. I I I Rice Lake I I 1 I 1 I Independence 1 I Medina I Medicine Pioneer CreekI I Lake t I I Maple � — I I Lower Plain I Lake ' — Minnetonka I Plymouth • Crystal Ba Lake ♦ r Long Lake-, ** •,`�♦ � — — A --------------Minnetonka •�."•� •�♦ �...... to.. L—�— — 1 1 Orono . Minnehaha N : , _+ Wayzata , 'Creek • _ 66 40 o r — / � • _ _ _\ Woodland �\ U) oMinnetrista _ , • �•• Minnetonka • I I L — I BeachDee haven ! Minnetonka E I I Spring,Par k, p f W s J • . ♦ ' ' / I Mound T ♦ _ J l I Tonka Bay i I I \,Greenwood\ oShorewood I— I i/—\ z I 1 Excelsior y / D I LI— r I l Upper Lake --ter I y I Minnetonka Hen ounty I -- -- — — — — —— -- I i Carver unt � I � w I / I I M I Legend e a Lake Minnetonka o r� City Limits I `I Watershed Boundary J r Surrounding Chanhassen Lakes & Ponds Communities I Rivers &Streams QCounty Boundary 0 1.s I Miles Chaska I Map 3A-1 0 Source: MnGeo 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN °° 12 sta 0 Turner Road '0•„ , .. .. .,..m.F.... ._.........r.....,...,...� � ao, �m 0 Drake Dr_� e _ ° 0 0 UK N Lake Gree. I pve Clasen \,ke" , as z IND o e��o 0 �a Moline Road ° i wA m hos a wn Roaa, 19N r � � 2 6 � aYs;ae a Cn a j cya d J h' Stubbs r woa d r Bay F— z5 'o c� Lydiard 0. CD °o Lake Kelley �p�NY Long m '' * `• Lake „gDaniels St 1 1 I 12 ..,,: �i -Ra ,` Grand A �Orcfiard��n �,�• y� pF` "•� 009 Lake 0 i 'a'4 .i ... ,�-Wayzata Blvd c 1 � 0 - • Painter a �� ° Amsh rE83a W Branch Road County Road 151 W _& �North v ArmMaxwell LakeTanagerj r 1� Bay French Sunnyfield Road E IJ Forest Marsh v Lake Shore Dr O z � c Denning I 2 Bay m 0 '' ♦ Smith Game Farm Road c Bracketts g l, z J a <0 Pve Moot . ......� '« 9t Y w 'c° _ Lake 7_4 Arm E ( 1 G Z 0 • 6q�e Lake > Dickey H 1 do' 3: 'Lake = ` ��Pad - prin �• • z5 'o c� Lydiard 0. CD °o Lake Kelley �p�NY Long m '' * `• Lake „gDaniels St 1 1 I 12 ..,,: �i -Ra ,` Grand A �Orcfiard��n �,�• y� pF` "•� 009 Lake 0 i 'a'4 .i ... ,�-Wayzata Blvd c 1 � 0 - • Painter a �� ° Amsh rE83a W Branch Road County Road 151 W _& �North v ArmMaxwell LakeTanagerj r 1� Bay French Sunnyfield Road E IJ Forest Marsh v Lake Shore Dr O z � c Denning I 2 Bay m 0 '' ♦ Smith Game Farm Road c Bracketts g l, z J a 3 Pve 4th Ave N 1� ay Point UWest Dutch Arm Crystal Bo hns �•���' �� •' �. Lake > Bay Point. - oint.•Harrison • Ha rrison .. - �.� �' Bay 1 Lynwood Blvd - • • - • • _ .. _ . t + 1 ; 1 o v Shoreline Dr - � + Lafayette 1 <,yric,Ave .. �, Bay Legend e �• ''��` .�.-' _'' �.• •• -' City Limits Lakes & Ponds -..rPark Sprinc; 1 Carman's �• Bay ► Bay ♦ � ., �•' 2040 MUSA Rivers & Streams Q 0 3,500 e Feet nc� Casco Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, ' • Point 1 Hennepin County, MnDOT L erts IV, d x /0 Wetlands � & E BOLTON K November 2018 Real People. Real Solutions. Wayzata Bay Min QHighldnb vi J JQ Rutledge Road fr— / ti Azure Road Par Wetlands Stormwater Ponds ,,,4 I � ' 22,a oe Z l J � 3 Q,th Ave N Ave { Y 1 Map 3A-2 National Wetlands Inventory z J a 3 Pve 4th Ave N 1� J ?F rd E Map 3A-2 National Wetlands Inventory 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN `� 12 Moot a, Turner Road a v Lake Drake Dr3 w w w r o Z ♦ E • 6t1j e V a !` o o Orrwwrwl, ®� load sh q�.eh 1 V • w e Spring G�eeK �PveN q o m r w� w:Z 1 + as Z \� y 1P{rt? •..r-� it h10 V co a e eA ° Daniels Strch" 1 P • c Moline Road c o WA °� v . 1 �jGran�LL /�° r%°!a a 9' Lake19 NO '� '/`• i ` `� � 1 'A° ♦ i� W9 1 \® + Y ♦1 Wd aYside 1 w 1 _d • 1 ♦ 1 _ .. Yzata Blvd W ,A, Iwwwl P r a• 12 V m 0 Painter a W Branch Road Sunnyfield Road E a f0 0 D: m Game Farm Road E Dutch Lake Z c,p Jenning' Bay ,a Harrison L Bay Legend e •r City Limits Lakes & Ponds 1, +t 2040 MUSA Rivers & Streams w 0 3,500 Feet Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT 1 J ■ m w r Fox StP A Ipyw �! +■ r w w r Raw w w w r ■� w w w w w M �w,f �0 ♦✓° r�. N" Y_ o Browns 1 ° Ir - Maxwell a■ 1� Lake- Bay BaYTFrench Marsh 1 E t�5hore or Q 1 1 �•w` , - Smith Bracketts •♦ _ Bay Point 1 �.✓' ►., 1 We, .� 1 Crystal Boh, •✓� �`� 1 Bay Pnir �`�• 1 oe •r.w 1 Imo• 1 �'✓ •w•.,�.'1 1 1 SJR lil Lafayette ! i <yricAve r kw.w.w-w•w•♦ Bay J Springy p, 1 ' `40• - Soils November 2018 r0 O Wayzata Bay Ave Soils By Drainage Class BOLT MENK Real People. Real Solutions. Unclassified C B/D A C A/D C/D B Map 3A-3 Ave N Z c J a 0 0 w 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN M W Turner Road a O Drake Dr Minnesota Land Cover Classification November 2018 Katrina � 12 ! " Sta Moon Lake 10 m r.. z rn G / �+ r416 p Ar no Lake F �e = 1 gr Pve N i v1 Cl i,se 1 Z \, l - a }' � 3 iL..2+ +1 �t z Q 0 0 c ° Moline Road w Q 19N 26 W Branch Road` County Road 151 Sunnyfield Road E \ a 0 0 is m Game Farm Road Dutch Lake Jenning' Bay Harrison Bay ell Kelley ,PV Y� , O v .,o baa r O _ z ,•. 161, 0 t, } - ."' cf H Daniels St `1 1 c 12 .• 1 LL o �, dR m r v' . t' Orchard [:• y 1 1 ev V / �o s. v f Grand Ave Ln �, Z04 .0 5 � Oi P . +� � � r � ;hg La -k,- `+ 1 � • ` g 3r " d,Ave Ro kir ..,f` � e 0 tf 1 a 4` 'gip •t !`."" 41 �aYsige 1� �y.�� -e ' . d yam" Pa • 1 1 Wayzata Blvd W�r� ��i ND • a.Ar p O. e s.� �► Stubbs 49 6 .,, • .�, ` + w 1 i Bay AM. E . m r.. '1 A..1 ox StpV no ft IL L rY ° 1 i+ �♦ •. + + North r`�,"p. 0 Am - 4 1 Bay Forest Shore s r • Lake — D •*% *# 1 SII West •�~ j Crystal Bohr �� 1 Bay Point 4*f 1 5 1 1 1 Lafayette ; Bay Legend eJw ''� �r: City Limits Lakes & Ponds Spring] Carman's V. , Park M+ Bay Bay 1� t 2040 MUSA Rivers & Streams �'� V 0 3,500 nif`o� �� as Feet C Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, � Poi 1 Hennepin County, MnDOT / y Aver' BOLTN /1 & MENK Real People. Real Solutions. i"" z c J 3 gc� Ave z 1 > 5 3 Q) 4th Ave N > f U 1` U c —or St4e `F Rice St F wayZata Blvd E -CO Lake St E � m q) �oAaa Pe Fo�cL51601 k to, t MLCCS 11. 5-10% 31. Forest Impervious 12. 11-25% 32. Wetland Impervious Forest 13. 26-50% 51. Shrubland Impervious 52. Wetland 14. 51-75% Shrubs Impervious 61. Tall _15. 76-100% Grasses Impervious 62. Wetland �3 a 21. Short Grasses Emergent Veg. 63. Dry Tall 22. Agricultural Grasses Par Land 90. Open 23. Maintained Tall Grass Water 92. Wetland 24. Tree Open Water Plantation Map 3A-4 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN fi,q-' Xlr`�t-t M 0 rn Turner Road 'a m 0 Drake Dr 3 rlr, c p 3 U U / i ,,'" ' 0 / o Moline Road m r IL 19N i, V oadRaIlItI r si W Branch Road- Countv Road 151 FEMA Floodplain � & E BOLTON K November 2018 Real People. Real Solutions. Katrina: 12 Lake �'/ St r �'. % Y d Moon .. _ ..�....,.,.a^ ._....-.. i c Lake E •1 �4 z R 2 o � l f' rr, a .• 3 Dickey v woad q�e H 1 ' Lake r °_ Laky o� - . f- Spring, �� , 1 j _ Cis �1� R �� S�a3� �� Lyd% - . a Z —W—.Kelley Kelley;po-Y.,. aQ P°GO�.�., '�. Lake Lakes 1 Ix' / �y Danielsst ~�i -r,_, Il X� � 12 o "`/ v Grand A �OrcFiard��' • Y < 0 W/ I WL 9 Lake 00. Q0 �aysige �Ff'�1' w .io, , •' 1 .. aYzata Blvd W ,Q 1 s rd 1 (_ p.( oda 12 1 � 1 � � � Gy9c � . � % � � 1 � / R� art o �4{ 1� 1 J . { `� :•r 1 v� Lake st � ' ( Fox Sr `° - w ; �►'� �, ,� �° mom t> r Ave Z_ z c J 3 Aver y _ 4th Ave N > North o Brow, 1 P_e((Wayzata �' U Arm �aITe nagei, Bay l� Bay Maxwell i% ��// "' lake { 1 Bay o/ French / / �' • ��� ,Sunnyfield Road E Foresf Mi��h % - % 1 i �•,,/ ro . /, Lake Shore Dr /i 0 Jenning'so Bay M �-•� � �, Game Farm Road � Smith Bracketts • Point 1 i / to 111We. i // j Dutch : " /oo Cryst % Lake i > 1 / Bay Point ♦ /„ .�.� 1 �..-• i r' y � i ••.A* Harrison �••�s.. I �� s..•�. 1 4F '� 1 Minnetonka Blvd eBay �'� �.•"- .r�i� � 1 w a Lynwood Blvd / {.�.��..I 1 0 L' . 1 ; �3� Highlantl Ave ��� m c �S`^ ' U Shoreline Dr / ' J Lafayette a—Rutledge Road i / �♦ --- Azure•Road a i , /� _•- -' i <,yric.Ave �l .��.�� Bay `I " Day PI 01 Legend ;� �''� �• - �` �� par Flood Hazard Zones y �I /, /, 100 Year Floodway o _ Cit Limits Lakes & Ponds i /Sprint Floodplain s �' , r / ..t • //r Park - , 0, , /���/ ,� �' Carman 'a 1 M �1 / Bay Ba+� �♦ ,� �i %/ 500 Year 1 t 2040 MUSA Rivers & Streams hili,' . '♦ a� �[ Floodplain y 0 3,500 .e� ,` Ca Feet Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, •ter°i i %-- Map 3A-5 ts Hennepin County, MnDOT r'��'�•�'�� ( //�! e`r�wd 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN r, CD cc Turner Road a �a L / L j 2 ..�� ileo-ii�bi Lake _ . .. Sta,. !, F ...�....�,...�,...� Moot a°. 0 o ` / Drake Dr 3 Shoreland Overlay District Lake da -1 0 E o V Setback z �a Overlay a 0 Stubbs 0 0 L3 Painter v,oad Dickea0, load Al Lake Classen c 0ee1 �pveN m a Qa �� Lake m � Kelley�l 151 c a e �•0 V ` Z m c North p y 12 Moline Road 0 G Browns LL v dP t6 m x a - Ja 19N mown Roan ake Shoreland Overlay District BOLTON November 2018 (D & M E N K Real People. Real Solutions. City Limits Lakes & Ponds Sprinc, —..� Park ; Carman s Bay 1 Bay •• •�. 2040 MUSA Rivers & Streams Q ; '••� • 0 3,500 .tee Feet n `• • Casco Point 1 Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, �•. Hennepin County, MnDOT �'' —" —•' — k L L / L • ,rs/ae •QQ Q L Moot /°. w Shoreland Overlay District Lake da -1 Gy9c w a E _ Setback z �a Overlay Streams 0 Stubbs q�e Painter v,oad Dickea0, load Al Lake 3 ■ • �0 0• Spring R WaYzata Blvd m a Lydiard �� Lake m � 151 a0' �0 City Limits Lakes & Ponds Sprinc, —..� Park ; Carman s Bay 1 Bay •• •�. 2040 MUSA Rivers & Streams Q ; '••� • 0 3,500 .tee Feet n `• • Casco Point 1 Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, �•. Hennepin County, MnDOT �'' —" —•' — k L • ,rs/ae •QQ �,� � J d /°. w Shoreland Overlay District da O' ado, Gy9c w a Lakeshore G1Q1 . • Setback Floodplain �M— Overlay Streams 0 Stubbs rr- Painter v,oad 9 Lar, rn� ■ • �0 0• Bay Fox St m _ WaYzata Blvd a `° N W Branch Road —: 12 County Road 151 a0' V ` c North p Browns 0 Arm Maxwell Bay ake 1� Bay French Smith Sunnyfield Road E rJ Bay Forest Marsh Shore � Lake � � Dr n Z c Jenning's 1 2 Bay 1 m 0 E � 1 • • �• Game Farm Road �• •' 0 1 West ,•� • Dutch v Crystal Bohns •• �. Lake > Bay Point •• ��'•�• m Harrison ! �.._� •.� Bay Lynwood Blvd E — - • — • • _ .. _ • t 1 v Shoreline or - aBay 4,yric.Ave Lafayette Ba y ,• • / �''� %'• Legend •'•• City Limits Lakes & Ponds Sprinc, —..� Park ; Carman s Bay 1 Bay •• •�. 2040 MUSA Rivers & Streams Q ; '••� • 0 3,500 .tee Feet n `• • Casco Point 1 Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, �•. Hennepin County, MnDOT �'' —" —•' — k L Ave Wayzata Bay E Ave N Minn dnl a Blvd 1 I w Shoreland Overlay District Protected O' ado, Tributaries Lakeshore G1Q1 . • Setback Floodplain �M— Overlay Streams rr- 9 Lar, ■ • �0 0• WaYzata Blvd W —: 12 1 ` Browns I;ea , F Tanage Bay ake I I Smith Bracketts I Bay Point I P 4innet--' I I n I 1 Ave Wayzata Bay E Ave N Z C, Minn dnl a Blvd I w Shoreland Overlay District Protected ®District Boundary Tributaries Lakeshore Included Setback Floodplain �M— Overlay Streams Z C, CMP Part 3B. General Lande Use Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS CMP PART 3B. GENERAL LAND USE PLAN Page Introduction Scope Basic Land Use Concepts and Principles Table 3B-1: Orono Population and Households 1970-2040 Table 311 -la: Orono Populations and HH adjusted Land Use Goals and Policies The Land Use Plan 313-2 3B-2 3B-3 3B-4 3B-5 3B-6 3B-12 Figur.,, B I Generalized Land Use 3B -14 Table 3B-2: Orono Existing Land Use Summary 313-15 Table 3B-3: Orono 2040 Planned Land Use 3B-15 Table 311-4: Planned Development Sites 3B-23 Table 3B-5: Net Density 3B-24 Table 313-6: Planned Development by Decade 313-24 Employment 3B-24 Figure 311-13 Employment 313-24 Figure 311-23 Employment by Industry 313-25 Historic Site Preservation Plan 3B-25 Appendix4 Maps Map 3B-1 Map 3B-2 Map 3B -2B Map 3B-3 Map 3B -3B Map 3B-4 Urban and Rural Areas Existing Land Use Existing Land Use -Navarre Area Proposed Land Use Proposed Land Use Navarre Area Planned Development SitesAreas Appendix 14-313-1 Navarre Area Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 313, Page 1 CMP Part 3B. General Lande Use Plan CMP PART 3B LAND USE PLAN INTRODUCTION This Land Use Plan is a refinement and restatement of the ongoing planning practices of Orono citizens. It respects and maintains the historic development patterns of the City. It continues the basic land use concepts developed by Orono Township in 1950 and it conforms to the goals established by the first organized comprehensive planning attempts in the mid 1960's. This Plan is prepared and presented for the following purposes: L The Land Use Plan is intended to be a management tool for City officials, City staff, and other parties involved in land development and growth management in Orono. Orono's land use plan indicates the basic location, density and types of land uses in the City that are considered to be compatible with environmental conditions and beneficial to the long term health, safety and welfare of the City and its citizens alike. Z The Land Use Plan is intended to be a guide for future development so as to reinforce our environmental protection commitment and to ensure such development will be consistent with existing land use. This Plan is compatible with the plans of nearby cities for land use of abutting neighborhoods and for overall levels of services and facilities. 3. The Land Use Plan is intended to advise the Metropolitan Council and our municipal neighbors of Orono's planning and growth management programs. The Land Use Plan illustrates and coordinates the various goals and policies of all the elements of the Community Management Plan. 4, The Land Use Plan is intended to be used as a basis for public facilities planning. The Land Use Plan plays an important role in determining each neighborhood's ultimate population, the required capacity of public facilities, and an appropriate capital improvements program. 5. The Land Use Plan is intended to be used as the basis for developing responsible ordinances for land use management. Zoning and subdivision controls have been established and will continue to be refined to implement the intent of this Land Use Plan. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 2 CMP Part 313. General Lande Use Plan MOM The time framework of the Land Use Plan is intended to be consistent with the regional planning period of 2020 through 2040 and with the City's permanent planning policy for rural Orono. Orono's long range land use plans call for permanent maintenance of the existing low density rural residential areas. There is to be no staged growth plan and no expansion of the existing urban service area. This commitment is particularly important to the many Orono citizens who are making private investments based upon this concept. BASIC LAND USE CONCEPTS AND PRINCIPLES Orono's planning programs have long recognized the development paradox, or urbanization spiral, which often results from arbitrary planning assumptions or from incomplete analysis of planning alternatives. The most striking example in Orono's situation is the documented evidence that over- extension of sanitary sewers, ostensibly to solve a pollution problem, can easily in itself cause irretrievable water quality degradation of Lake Minnetonka. Chapter 1 of this Plan outlines the "urbanization spiral". Nutrient management technologies such as NURP ponds, alum treatments, and a wide variety of Best Management Practices provide added tools to manage runoff from rural densities. However, Orono cannot and will not rely solely on man- made systems for preserving water quality, and will not increase density to pay for stormwater management infrastructure. A principal goal of Orono's planning program is the protection of natural resources and environmental amenities, particularly the water quality of Lake Minnetonka. The Environmental Protection Plan emphasizes Orono's unique environmental position in relation to the long-term health of Lake Minnetonka. Retention of natural vegetation, light, air, and open space will be promoted. Shorelines will be protected from erosion and alteration. Water quality preservation is dependent upon effective sewage treatment programs. Urbanized areas, shoreland areas and remaining existing higher -density housing clusters within the Rural area have been or will be provided with municipal sanitary sewer to prevent discharge of untreated or insufficiently treated sewage effluent into the Lake. In the rural areas, low density land use can be safely served long- term by individual on-site sewage treatment systems. Historic development patterns have resulted in a city which is partially urban and partially rural. These two development patterns offer a variety of housing to meet residents' lifestyle and service desires. The citizens of Orono have determined that a long range planning objective of the City is the permanent retention of the rural community. This objective is in line with the existing developed density of the area, and with the similar plans of other cities abutting the rural area. Orono is partly in the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) and partly outside the current MUSA. The MUSA was established by Metropolitan Council to define the extent of areas where urban services will be provided and urban scale development will occur. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 313, Page 3 CMP Part 3B. General Lande Use Plan Urban and rural neighborhoods require differing levels of public services and facilities. The urban areas of Orono have sufficient density to require, and to financially support, municipal sewer and water services, increased police and fire protection, public works projects and public recreational facilities. These areas have such facilities in place and in sufficient capacity to accommodate all projected urban development. The rural areas have limited density and have environmental restraints prohibiting urban density encroachments. Orono expects future development in both the urban and the rural portions of the city. The urban area is expected to have new residential infill development on the existing vacant lots and undeveloped parcels at densities consistent with the Community Management Plan. Additional of higher density housing is anticipated in the planning term to accommodate a wider range of affordability and lifecycle housing needs, overall urban density will remain relatively low. The rural area is expected to have continued infill residential development. Non-residential development will likely be limited to open space recreation. Over time, changes in national priorities, population trends, metropolitan plans and metropolitan facilities have continued to reinforce the planning and development objectives of Orono. Community leaders have consistently held firm to the quality over quantity in approving development proposals, and will continue to do so. These close it proximity to Coro metfo aro The projected population is a direct result of Orono's environmental protection policies and is consistent with the proposed public facilities plans of Orono, the Hennepin County Public Works Department, the Minnesota Department of Transportation and Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES). Table 3B-1 illustrates Orono Populations and Households growth, from 1970, projected through 2040. The most recent data supplied by the Met Council, in 2016, shows 7,691 people in 3,037 households. Table 3B-1: Orono Population, Households, and Employment 1970 - 2040 (Sewered and Unsewered Forecasts) Population Year 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2016 2020 2030 2040 Sewered - - -- -- 4,429 -- 5,150 6,170 6,740 Unsewered -- -- -- -- 3,008 -- 2,950 2,630 2,760 Total City 6,787 6,845 7,285 7,538 7,437 7,691 8,100 8,800 9.500 Household Year 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2016 2020 2030 2040 Sewered -- -- -- -- - 1,780 2,105 2,455 2,785 2,253 Unsewered -- 2,146 -- 2,291 -- 2,613 -- 2,766 1046 2,826 784 3,037 1,095 3,200 1,105 3,560 1,115 3,900 Total Citv Persons/M 3.16 2.99 2.79 2.73 2.63 2.53 2.53 2.47 2.44 Employment 500 809 980 951 1562 1579 1700 1780 1800 City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 4 CMP Part 3B. General Lande Use Plan Source: Metropolitan Council System Statement Table 313-1: Orono Population and Households 1970 - 2040 (Sewered and Unsewered Forecasts) Population Year 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2016 2020 2030 2040 Sewered -- -- -- -- 4,429 -- 5,150 6,170 6,740 Unsewered -- -- -- -- 3,008 -- 2,950 2,630 2,760 Total City 6,787 6,845 7,285 7,538 7,437 7,691 8,100 8,800 9,500 Sewered 1780 Household 2105 -148 Year 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2016 2020 2030 2040 Sewered -- 1,780 2,253 2,105 2,455 2,785 Unsewered 1,115 -- 1046 784 1,095 1,105 1,115 Total City 2,146 2,291 2,613 2,766 2,826 3,037 3,200 3,560 3,900 Persons/HH 3.16 2.99 2.79 2.73 2.63 2.53 2.53 2.47 2.44 Source: Metropolitan Council System Statement Table 3B -la illustrates the number of households need to be created based on the 2016 updated numbers. In summary, the city will need to add 2-02-523 Sewered households to meet 2030 projections, and 5-3-2-340 households in the 2030s to meet 2040 forecasts. Table 3B In! n,.ono (Sewered and Unsewered Table 3B -1a: Orono Households 2010 - 2040 (Sewered and Unsewered adiusted Forecasts) Y-esar Year 220-10 24" 2020 Est. Household 2030 tet. Change &-om 24M 2049 FM Change from from Sewer-ed 4-7" �S3 Chance 449 Chante 2040 Change Year 2010 2016 2020 Est. from 2030 Est. from Est from 331 Total City -1 1,446 3A37 3;200 2016 2016 5" 2030 Sewered 1780 2253 2105 -148 2,455 202 2,785 330 Unsewered 1046 784 1095 311 1105 321 1,115 10 Total City 2,826 3037 3,200 L163 3,560 523 3,900 340 Source: Metropolitan Council System Statement, City Utility Accounts Table 3B In! n,.ono (Sewered and Unsewered Households adjusted 2010 204-0 z',.re ,mss) Y-esar Year 220-10 24" 2020 Est. Change fi-om 2816 2030 tet. Change &-om 24M 2049 FM Change from from Sewer-ed 4-7" �S3 244D5 449 2-,45,5 2-Q 2,-7S5 -5132 Tear 1946 784 4995 344 1105 324 1,11-5 331 Total City -1 1,446 3A37 3;200 lb3 3sb0 5" Lmt- 863 Seurce: Metropolitan Council System Statement, City iseeunts Regional transportation plans have been revised since the 1970's to accommodate the increased traffic City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 5 CMP Part 313. General Lande Use Plan levels on Highway 12 through Orono and Long Lake. Environmental and social pressures have eliminated any plans for expansion of County Road 15 along the lakeshore. Orono will continue to promote and implement strategies to reroute traffic away from the lakeshore areas. Regional sewer service facilities plans were revised three decades ago in response to Orono's plans for low-density development. The final Orono -Long Lake Interceptor is in place with a design capacity for less than 8,400 Orono residents and a limited service area. In the early 1980's, the Maple Plain Interceptor was similarly designed to provide only limited capacity for Orono. These capacity limitations are consistent with Orono's goals for the rural area. Orono's commercial and economic development has always been centered in the historic town centers. The shopping, employment, education and social needs of Orono residents have been met by commercial facilities and shopping centers located in Navarre and in surrounding communities. Promotion of duplicate facilities in Orono would tend to be uneconomic and counterproductive. Orono's housing plan is intended to accommodate all planned population growth in a wide variety of housing opportunities. New urban housing will be in a variety of forms including single family homes on scattered vacant lots throughout the sewered area; planned residential developments including mixed single family, attached townhome, and apartment dwelling units on vacant sewered parcels along Wayzata Boulevard and in the Navarre Area. Most new rural housing will be on new lots of two to five acres net dry -buildable area, all with prior approved site evaluation and proof of adequate septic system operation. In Shoreland areas previously brought into the MUSA, new low- density rural development may be provided with municipal sewers to afford the maximum level of protection for Lake Minnetonka and other Orono lakes. Orono's comprehensive sewer policy plan is designed to provide an adequate, safe level of sewage treatment and waste water disposal for all urban and rural properties. Sewage treatment policies respect the limited regional capacity and the differing levels of service required by urban and rural neighborhoods. Municipal sewer capacity is available for projected urban development within the existing urban service area. Orono's transportation plan is tailored to the different needs of urban and rural neighborhoods. Near the lakeshore and in some rural areas, the collector roads are relatively slow speed with circuitous alignment dictated by the hills and bays rather than by commuter preference. The urban areas are provided with a typical network of city streets connecting residential and shopping areas with each other. The rural area is gridded-off with a core system of publicly maintained collector and minor arterial streets running at regular intervals. Orono's parks and open space facilities reflect different urban and rural characteristics. In the urban area, the City provides numerous small neighborhood parks and playgrounds offering centers for neighborhood activities such as swimming, skating, softball., and soccer. In addition, three larger preserves (Casco Circle, Saga Hill., and Highwood) offer substantial "natural" areas. In the rural area, a variety of City -owned parks and preserves offer a range of active and passive recreation opportunities. Large public and quasi -public recreational facilities include Three Rivers Park District lands, several golf courses, a City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 6 CMP Part 3B. General Lande Use Plan gun club, Minnesota DNR's the Luce Line state Trail, theme Dakota Rail Trail, as well as two'big woods' Scientific and Natural Areas. LAND USE GOALS AND POLICIES Orono's Land Use Plan is based upon the following goals and policies which in turn have been actively developed and fostered by Orono residents over the last 45 years. Land Use Goals 1. To reinforce Orono's environmental protection commitment, with special emphasis on the protection of Lake Minnetonka and Orono's other lakes. 2. To maintain the historic identity and character of the separate urban and rural neighborhoods. 3. To provide appropriate places for a variety of local residential, educational, recreational, industrial and neighborhood commercial activities. 4. To protect neighborhoods from encroachment of incompatible land uses. 5. To coordinate Orono's land uses with that of neighboring communities. 6. To coordinate land uses and developed density with the financial and physical capabilities of the City. General Land Use Policies 1. The boundary between Orono's Urban and Rural Areas is fixed. Orono's Urban Area will not be strictly defined by the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) boundary or future expansions of the MUSA boundary but will be fixed by this and the other elements of the Community Management Plan. Orono's defined Urban and Rural Areas are best described by the planned development types and densities. Areas where the zoned density allows fie more than 1 unit per 2 aeres is deemed Rural; areas where the zoned density allows more than I unit per 2 aeres is deemed Urban—,Orono's Urban and Rural areas are depicted and fixed by Map 3B-1. 2. The Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) will define the areas of Orono where municipal sewers may be extended. The MUSA will include all parts of Orono's Urban Area and may include parts of Orono's Rural Area where appropriate. The MUSA boundary in Orono will define areas where sewer exists or where it may be extended to serve existing or new development, but will not define the areas where general urban services will be provided, and it will not strictly define the boundary between higher density and low-density development. 3. Orono's land use plans will be based upon environmental protection policies. Land use and development must assure the conservation, protection and preservation of sensitive environmental resources in accordance with the goals and policies of the Environmental Protection Plan. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 7 CMP Part 3B. General Lande Use Plan 4. Development density will be limited throughout the city to a level which will not overload the natural surface water drainage and filtration system. Urbanization increases the rate and quantity of surface runoff while decreasing the water quality. To the extent that it is practical and feasible, the City will supplement existing natural assimilation capacities with man- made ponding areas, but will not allow increases in development density beyond the defined density as a result of such supplementation. 5. The wetlands, floodplains, and marshlands of the city will be protected and preserved as wildlife habitats, as unique open spaces, and as an economically practical and effective method of flood protection and storm water runoff filtration. Wherever possible, the City will acquire open space and flowage easements for conservation of these lands. The city will not support the filling of a wetland to provide a buildable lot. 6. Protection of lake resources will allow reasonable access, use and enjoyment while preventing overcrowding and excessive encroachment. In conformance with Orono's Shoreland Management regulations, Orono will prohibit overly dense development within 1,000 feet of Lake Minnetonka. Lake use regulations will be promoted to limit excessive boat density and overuse of sensitive bays. 7. Lake shorelines will be protected from alteration. Shoreland areas, whether bluff, beach or floodplain, are sensitive environmental features with significant impact on lake water quality, aesthetic values and land use function. These same factors act to draw development which can be destructive if not properly regulated. Natural vegetation in shoreland areas will be preserved insofar as practical and reasonable in order to limit surface runoff and soil erosion, and to utilize excess nutrients. Clearcutting will be prohibited. In areas of soil or wave action erosion, material stone rip rap shoreline protection will be encouraged. Where determined to be feasible and practical, alternative natural methods of shoreline protection other than rip -rap will be promoted. Excavation, filling and other grade changes at or near the shoreline for the sole purpose of accommodating development will be discouraged. 8. The City will work to encourage and facilitate slope stabilization measures prior to slope failures. 9. Development or alteration of floodplains will be restricted. The City will observe and administer Flood Plain regulations as required by the DNR. 10. Orono's land use plan will promote the preservation of open space, light and air. Sufficient open spaces will be provided in each neighborhood and on each lot to prevent overcrowding and to ensure adequate light, air and recreation for all residents. 11. Private ownership, maintenance and stewardship of the land, including open space and many types of improvements, is favored over public ownership as being in the best and most beneficial interests of the property owner and the public, providing for more intimate, City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 8 CMP Part 3B. General Lande Use Plan responsive and economical land management. 12. No land owner should be denied the right to develop his land by any staged growth, land banking or no -growth policy, provided the development can be accomplished within the performance standards, policies and requirements of the Community Management Plan. 13. Future development must enhance the community. Land development should respect preserve the value of the land and the integrity, stability and beauty of the community. 14. Physical improvements required to accommodate new development must be provided by the developer. It is the policy of the City that development pays for itself, physical improvements such as roads, drainage and utilities required to accommodate new subdivisions or development should be designed, financed and installed directly by the benefited developer as a precondition to development In addition, this philosophy includes developer responsibility for special fire protection equipment or devices in the case of unusual land uses or building configurations, and/or special security services in the case of unusual public safety situations. 15. All physical improvements must conform to city standards. Physical improvements related to health, safety or community systems such as roads, pathways, drainage or utility systems will be designed, located and constructed to uniform, City -established standards to ensure proper functioning and compatibility with overall City plans. 16. Developers must dedicate lands required for public use. Land subdivision or any development that results in increased land use density, and hence increased demand for municipal services, will be expected to include public dedication of lands necessary for additional road rights of way, parks, playgrounds, trails, open space, ponds or storm water holding areas whenever such facilities are directly used by the subdivided land or required by such density increase. If the individual development's property is not conducive to public land dedication, then in lieu of lands the developer may be required to contribute funds for the municipal purchase of such lands or the improvement of such facilities proportionate to the cumulative effect of such density increase from multiple small developments. 17. No land will be permitted to be subdivided or built upon which is held unsuitable by the City for the proposed use because of flood hazards, inadequate drainage, soil formations with severe limitations for development, severe erosion potential, unfavorable topography, inadequate water supply or sewage disposal capabilities, or any other feature likely to be harmful to the health, safety, or welfare of the future residents of the proposed subdivision or of the community. Urban Land Use Policies 1. The majority of Orono's urban area will be reserved for residential land use. Many urban residences will be intimately associated with the lake shoreline and will be subject to density restrictions because of sensitive environmental conditions. Medium and High Density multi- family residential uses will be limited to locations near existing shopping and transportation City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 9 CMP Part 3B. General Lande Use Plan services, but will not be appropriate within 1,000 feet of the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka except when in close proximity to the Navarre commercial area abutting CR 15 or CR 19. 2. Commercial areas will be provided for neighborhood service businesses. The primary function of Orono's commercial areas will be to provide those retail, commercial and service businesses which are directly necessary to serve Orono's urban and rural residents. Commercial development will be limited to areas where full urban services, including municipal sanitary sewer and adequate transportation are available. Commercial development of a regional nature (i.e. "big box" retail) which would increase traffic, particularly on collector streets serving low density residential development, will be discouraged. Mixed Use Residential and Commercial Development is targeted for select traditionally commercial areas to provide a healthy base of customers for these limited commercial areas. 3. Lakeshore commercial areas will be provided for public access and limited lake -user services. Orono's residents and other lake users require lake access, fishing supplies, boat service and boat repair facilities which are unique to our location on a recreational development lake. Orono's Land Use Plan will provide locations for such special-purpose businesses where appropriate from both the land use and the lakeside environmental standpoint. No use or location will be permitted to adversely affect the lake quality or the public's general usage of the lake. All lakeshore commercial is to be limited to areas where full urban services, including municipal sanitary sewer and adequate transportation are available. 4. The City will encourage private unification and coordination of the existing commercial areas. Unplanned strip commercial developments will be discouraged. Coordinated projects designed to aesthetically enhance, unify and identify the business areas will be encouraged. 5. Future industrial development will be limited to the area of the existing Orono industrial park. No other location in Orono combines the availability of transportation and public utilities with remoteness from sensitive environmental features. In addition, this land use is consistent with Long Lake's neighboring industrial development. 6. Commercial and industrial development will not be permitted to adversely affect neighboring residential property. The location, scale and types of commercial and industrial development will be controlled so as not to encroach upon or adversely impact the primary residential land uses in Orono. Wherever possible, natural land forms or buffers will be required between different land uses. 7. Public urban services must be available for all future commercial, industrial and urban - residential development. Commercial, industrial and urban -density residential uses will be permitted only where municipal sanitary sewer, water, adequate transportation, police and fire protection services are available. 8. Urban development will utilize the capacity of existing public facilities. New land uses and development will be allowed to infill existing vacant properties within the urban service area consistent with environmental limitations and with the existing or planned capacities of water, sewer, drainage transportation and recreational facilities. New development will not be City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 10 CMP Part 313. General Lande Use Plan permitted to overburden these services at the expense of the existing users. 9. Land use standards will limit the impact of urban encroachment on Lake Minnetonka. Minimum lot width will space out docks and structural encroachments while increasing areas of natural vegetation. Lake use regulations promulgated by the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District and supplemented with City regulations if necessary will limit the number of boats per property and the amount of public waters available for private docking and boat storage. 10. Retention of natural vegetation will limit the impact of urbanization as visible from the lake. Building heights will be limited to less than the typical tree height. Minimum green belts will be provided with prohibitions against clearcutting or excessive thinning of vegetation. Natural vegetation will be preserved on slopes and retaining walls will be discouraged except when absolutely necessary to prevent erosion, in which case they will be screened with natural vegetation. Rural Land Use Policies Orono's rural area will be reserved for permanent low-density residential land use. Orono's rolling rural area is not suitable for commercial agriculture. Likewise, the delicate balance of storm water nutrient loading vs. marshland assimilative capacity precludes expansion of the urban service area without major environmental problems for Lake Minnetonka. Therefore, the ideal land use for that portion of Orono located outside of the Urban Service Area is the planned low- density rural residential land use. Commercial and industrial uses will not be permitted in the rural area. Orono's rural area provides the opportunity for quasi- agricultural land uses. Greenhouses, orchards, small hobby farms, riding stables, and recreation areas such as large golf courses and park reserves are not possible in more crowded urban areas but they are compatible with rural residential properties. Thus, the total commercial activity of Orono is broader and more varied than if the City were all urban or all rural. Rural density is limited by natural conditions. Development of rural Orono is naturally limited by a number of conditions including wetlands, steep slopes and areas of high water table, factors which influence building locations and transportation options as well as the location and spacing of on-site sewage treatment systems which rely on soil treatment of sewage effluent. The existing rural area will not be urbanized. Orono's Community Management Plan is not a staged growth plan. Municipal urban services will not be extended into the rural area or across open, rural lands. Rural land uses and densities do not require urban services. Urban services are not compatible with rural land use. Extension of certain urban services, such as extensive public road maintenance or municipal sewer or water cannot be economically justified or easily provided to developments in rural areas or at rural densities. Rural development will be subject to proven on-site sewage treatment capability. Future development in the rural area will be contingent upon the developer providing prior technical evidence that the site contains sufficient suitable land for all development, an acceptable primary City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 11 CMP Part 3B. General Lande Use Plan drainfield area, and reserved space for at least one alternate drainfield area. The zoning area requirements for rural Orono will therefore be based upon minimum areas of dry, buildable, contiguous land exclusive of roadways, wetlands, streams or areas of high water table. Rural land use densities will allow maximum retention of private woods and open space. Low rural densities will accommodate homesites without affecting the traditional vistas of open fields and woods. The retention of these woodlands and marshlands will then assure permanent habitat for our wildlife. Public open space will be provided on a large-scale or Park Reserve basis, but neighborhood or mini -parks are unnecessary because of the large amount of available privately owned and maintained open space. Rural lakeshore areas within the Shoreland and within the MUSA will be provided with municipal sewer service upon request. Municipal sewer service connections will be available to new or existing residences within the designated Shoreland Overlay District and within the MUSA when requested, costs to connect will be the responsibility of the property owner. However, this policy will not preclude development of such areas using fully conforming Individual Sewage Treatment Systems. Lakeshore Residential Land Use Policies Although Orono's lakeshore has a wide range of diversity in lot size and home size, the predominant character of Orono's lakeshore is natural. Natural is defined in part by much of the lakeshore being historically developed as large estate lots with homes set back a substantial distance from the lakeshore, or being developed as moderate homes on moderate lots leaving substantial open space. Natural includes remnants of native forests and vegetation, protection of the lakeshore from hardcover and impervious surface encroachments. The exception to the natural lakeshore is the areas where historically small cottages were built on small lots close to the lakeshore. These cottages in many cases have been updated, remodeled or expanded into year- round homes. The key goal of the City's Comprehensive Plan is to protect Lake Minnetonka, and other Orono lakes and waterways which includes the preservation of the natural character of the lakeshore and the water quality of the lakes. As the demand for, and value of, lakeshore property has dramatically increased, so has the pressure to expand or replace older homes with much larger homes. This pressure has the potential to substantially alter the natural character of the lakeshore, and the more open and natural environment enjoyed by property owners along much of the lakeshore in Orono. The following policies will guide the City in addressing development on the lakeshore. 1. Lake Minnetonka shall be protected as a natural and recreational resource. 2. The natural character of the lakeshore shall be preserved, and when possible, enhanced. The views and open space currently enjoyed by lakeshore property owners shall be reasonably protected. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 12 CMP Part 3B. General Lande Use Plan 4. The size of a house to be allowed on a lot shall be determined, in part, based on the size of the lot, as well as on the shape and topography of the lot. 5. The increase in massing of structures on the lakeshore shall be limited. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 13 CMP Part 3B. General Lande Use Plan 2016 Generalized Land Use City of Orono, Hennepin County Spring Park Mound i — —�— — Shorewood ►. 0.5 1 Minnetonka Beach Tonka I i Bay ! I 2 3 i Wayzata Woodland Deephaven r_1 i iii N111" 2016 Generalized Land Use Farmstead - Mixed Use Residential - Major Highway Seasonal/Vacation - Mixed Use Industrial - Railway Single Family Detached - Mixed Use Commercial and Other - Airport - Manufactured Housing Park Industrial and Utility Agricultural Single Family Attached Extractive Undeveloped Multifamily Institutional Water Retail and Other Commercial Park, Recreational or Preserve Office Golf Course L__ j County Boundaries I_ _ I City and Township Boundaries - NCompass Street Centerlines City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 313, Page 14 CMP Part 3B. General Lande Use Plan 2040 REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK Accommodating future growth of the Metro Area is a concern that will require wide-ranging resources. The Metropolitan Council in 2015 adopted "Thrive MSP 2040" to provide a plan for addressing the challenges that will be faced by the Twin Cities area over the next two decades in accommodating expected growth in the region. Forecasts indicate the metro area will grow by 820,000 people between 2010 and 2040, and as the average household size continues to shrink (from 2.55 in 2010 to 2.43 by 2040) an additional 389,000 households must be accommodated. In addressing the challenges of growth, Metropolitan Council has acknowledged that a "one size fits all" approach to implementing the Regional Development Framework is not appropriate, and has designated Geographic Planning Areas to identify communities with similar types of growth. In general, Orono's area within the MUSA boundary is designated as "Emerging Suburban Edge" and the areas outside the MUSA boundary are "Rural Residential". Metropolitan Council has identified a set of implementation strategies for each of these categories, as well as an umbrella of strategies that will apply to all communities. Map 3C-1 outlines the Community Designations and the community responsibilities. Each local community is required to address how it will plan for its share of regional affordable housing needs for the decade 2021-2030. Metropolitan Council has apportioned the forecasted need among each of the municipalities in the 7 -county metro area. Minnesota Statutes require that comprehensive plans include an implementation program that describes public programs, fiscal devices and other specific actions to be undertaken in stated sequence to implement the comprehensive plan and ensure conformity with metropolitan system plans. One required element is a housing implementation program, "...including official controls to implement the housing element of the land use plan, which will provide sufficient existing and new housing to meet the local unit's share of the metropolitan area need for low and moderate income housing." Orono's share is forecasted at 154 new affordable housing units for the decade 2021- 2030. EXISTING AND FUTURE LAND USE SUMMARY Map 313-2 depicts the existing land uses in Orono as of 2016. As shown :r Table 313-2: Orono Existing Land Use Summary, shows just over 1/3 of Orono's total area is in open water; of the remaining -2/3 that is land area, 92% is devoted to residential, parks & open space uses, or underdeveloped. Table 313-2: Orono Existing Land Use Summary (2016) Land Use Category Acreage % of City Rural Preserve 1,214 7.88% Rural Residential 2,677 17.38% Urban Low Density Residential 3,130 20.33% Urban Medium Density Residential 52 0.34% Urban Medium High Density Residential/ 102 0.66% Mixed Use Urban High Density Residential _ _ City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 15 CMP Part 3B. General Lande Use Plan Island Residential 65 0.42% Commercial/ Office 54 0.35% Industrial 42 0.27% Park/Open Space 1,720 11.17% Open Water 5,241 34.03% Major Highway and Railroad 773 5.02% Undeveloped "-Source:Existing 329 2.14% 15,399 100% Land Use Map City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 16 CMP Part 3B. General Lande Use Plan Table 2R 2. Orono Existing Land Use e...,,mary Land Use Categffy Acreng aty Rural Presecv'e 301.79 4=9"0 D..r.,l ResidefAiE 5469-.34 26 island Uos:,lo„t;,,l 75.99 0.^0 Urban Lew Density Resi o..tinl 244,8_79 15.890r/a TTrl,a TRo.I:,,,v, Density Residential 22-.40 0.10 Urban Med High/ Mixed Use Density Residential 0k0 0�� T lrl...« High Density Resi e f4i l4G.-S�q� n r',..,mer,.:.,1/Offiee V7TJ 5-06 Iffd*Stfig 34-.79 0,23% U.,rL Reere t;,....,1 .,...1 Open C. ae-e 11 C� O bake „-a,1 c�4T44and -3-OA D . Maj .,r HighwayHighway..;1....... 1 3 6.77 TOTAL !1 •Q p 0 Map 313-3 indicates the proposed land use plan of the city, identifying appropriate land uses and densities for each individual neighborhood. This land use map will form the basis for land use and zoning decisions over the next 20 years. Table 313-3 is a summary of Orono's Planned Land Use. Note that the Summary reflects that the planned uses are to be allowed to take effect immediately rather than being staged over a period of years, thus the 2030 and 2040 predicted acreages are the same as 2020 levels. . Land Use Categoff A"eage 0,10 of City Rural 1207.64 92"o D„r..l Resi e t;..l 2794-51 1 (]rte-rrio isl.,..,.1 Dos:.lo,,.t:.,l n,3"o Density��755.377 T Trl...« T..ensity Rest io«t:..l 2864-" 49-.9"0 Urban Tledi,,,K. Density Residential GOA 4.,4 Urban Nled High' Mixed Use Density Residential N zo 0-.5310z Urban r�.a L7ig Density Resi a:..l t.46 �!l 40 0-.2"0 0-.2 B Commereial/ Office 46.06 0-2-2-0A U.,ry Reere t:...,.,1 and Open C. aee 11 C� 44.q7,046 Lake and Open -Water 524644 -cam Major- Highway and Railway 136.77 0. 9 4 T/l-r-v r cTo ��� � �Vtl70 S )uwe: Pi used Land Use Map City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 17 CMP Part 3B. General Lande Use Plan Table 3B-3: Orono Planned Land Use Summary Land Use Category 2020 Acreage % of City 2030 Acreage % of city 2040 Acreage % of Cit Rural Preserve 1214 8.44% 1214 8.44% 1214 8.44% Rural Residential 2795 19.43% 2795 19.43% 2795 19.43% Island Residential 65 0.45% 65 0.45% 65 0.45% Urban Low Density Residential 2180 15.16% 2180 15.16% 2180 15.16% Urban Medium Density Residential 152 1.06% 152 1.06% 152 1.06% Urban Med-High/ Mixed Use Density 82 0.57% 82 0.57% 82 0.57% Residential Urban High Density Residential 64 0.45% 64 0.45% 64 0.45% Commercial/ Office 54 0.38% 54 0.38% 54 0.38% Industrial 42 0.29% 42 0.29% 42 0.29% Park, Recreational and Open Space 1720 11.96% 1720 11.96% 1720 11.96% Lake and Open Water 5241 36.44% 5241 36.44% 5241 36.44% Major Highway and Railway 773 5.37% 773 5.37% 773 5.37% TOTAL 100% 100% Source: Proposed Land Use Map The land uses identified in Map3B-3a and Map 313-3b are outlined in greater detail below. Lakes and Open Water Areas within the city boundary of open water. The Lakes and associated watersheds are a significant influence on the quality of life and character of the City. 2. Rural Preserve (1 units per 5 acres) The northwest corner of the City is planned for a lower density of one unit per five acres. This area has been developed to provide large lot and quasi agricultural home sites. The extension of municipal water or sewer is not intended for these areas. Residential dwelling units will be provided as single family detached structures. Rural Residential (1 unit per 2 acres) This is the typical rural residential density developed and planned to be permanently self-supporting. No rural density will be allowed greater than one unit per two acres except for those residences in existing rural housing clusters that were originally developed many decades ago and in most cases have been provided with municipal sewer within the past 3 decades. New rural developments may include housing clustering when environmental and site conditions allow, provided the overall density within the development conforms to these requirements, and provided that all sewage treatment needs can be adequately met within. Residential dwelling units will be provided as single family detached stnictures_ 4. Urban Low Residential `0.5-2 units per acre) This is intended for areas that have developed in a land use pattern of lots developed many decades ago smaller than 1 acre, and have access to sanitary sewer services. These lots have a particular impact on lake water quality, and lake character and storm water management, massing, and hardcover City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 18 CMP Part 3B. General Lande Use Plan controls are critical to the retention of this character. Residential dwelling units will be provided as single family detached structures. Urban Medium Residential (3-10 units per acre) This higher density will be reserved for properties deemed by the City Council to be so uniquely situated that residential development at the prescribed density will not negatively impact surrounding land uses. Such properties must have municipal sewer and water available. Other factors that will be taken into consideration in determining the appropriate locations for this density will include proximity to and the need for other urban utilities and services in relation to the proposed use; transportation system impacts and site access; and the ability of the proposed use to meet City housing goals. Residential dwelling units will be provided as single and two family structures. 6. Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use Residential (10-20 units per acre) This land use designation is reserved for specific sites, which based on their proximity to services and transportation corridors are deemed appropriate for higher density projects. The Mixed Use Residential and rommedesignation is intended for established commercial areas on higher classification transportation routes to introduce an element of higher density residential. This residential component will serve to augment the commercial uses with a near -by customer base and to provide an efficient use of land. The properties targeted for Mixed Use classification are in the Navarre area, including a number of commercially zoned properties abutting Shadywood Road, and additional commercial and residential properties abutting Shoreline Drive. This Mixed Use designation is intended to allow for the possibility of higher density multi -family residential development such as senior and assisted living, townhomes, condominiums or apartment buildings. Under the Mixed Use designation, properties currently zoned for residential use are not intended to be converted to commercial property, but existing commercial property could be converted to higher -density residential use or mixed residential -commercial uses in the same buildings. The City may also consider new zoning standards to regulate potential mixed-use projects. The City anticipates mixed use within the context of the neighborhood, and not necessarily specific to a particular parcel. Where employed, the City can envision ground level commercial services, with 'lnd .,—A Mrd 1,_.,,.1 ZA _«+:..1 +I_ _,,,_I_ __+ +I-- --,---+—A ,.«._„_......_1 ,7,._,,.t,....,....,.,,.� ...,.��,....., n,.,....,_..ti;,... in Area E of Table 3134 and Map 3134 are the primary candidates for mixed use development, which can be both vertical or horizontal. Based on the height limit (30 feet) and the desire for commercial services to mix with residential, the City anticipates no more than 70% of Area E to convert to residential uses. 7. Urban High Density Residential (20-25 units per acre) This land use designation is reserved for specific sites, which based on their proximity to services and transportation corridors, are deemed appropriate for higher density projects. Other factors that will be taken into consideration in determining the appropriate locations for this density will include proximity to and the need for other urban utilities and services in relation to the proposed use; transportation system impacts and site access; and the ability of the proposed use to meet City housing goals. Residential dwelling units are anticipated to be provided as 4 unit townhomes, apartments, condominiums, and senior housinj4 structures, no higher than 30 feet in defined height. 8. Island Residential (1 unit per 5 acres) City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 19 CMP Part 313. General Lande Use Plan The Island residential is characterized by limited access, utilities, and municipal services for properties originally developed as seasonal cabins. The Land use category is intended to preserve this land use without encouraging additional subdivision. This area is envisioned for seasonal occupancy in single family detached structures. 9. Commercial/ Office Commercial/ Office is the general land use describing 3 sub land use categories: Lakeshore Commercial, Navarre Commercial District, and Orono/ Long Lake Business District, and bakes ., o Cefnmefeia4. Urban commercial development is limited to two areas which are provided with all the necessary urban services and facilities. LAKESHORE COMMERCIAL Lakeshore Commercialerestricted to Lake access and lake user service businesses, including marinas, are appropriate for a lakeside community and require a lakeshore location, i ' ];- marinas. Special performance standards are necessary to assure protection of the lake environment. Parking, utilities, lake/ -and Highway access, and pedestrian circulation must be considered in siting new Lake Shore Commercial Uses. NAVARRE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT. See also Urban Medium High Density Residential/ Mixed Use. The major commercial center of Orono will continue to be Navarre. This area will provide opportunity for neighborhood retail and service businesses, plus professional offices. Accessory functions such as offices and owner oeetipie&living units or limited multi -family developments will be considered appropriate in or near the Navarre commercial area. The scale and type of retail uses in a pedestrian -friendly environment is the most important development parameter for the Navarre commercial area. The City will encourage redevelopment of individual commercial sites in Navarre to allow for an expanded range of neighborhood services and local small business opportunities. The Navarre Commercial District extends along either side of Shoreline Drive from the intersection of County Roads 15 and 19 westward to the Orono -Spring Park border, and along both sides of Shadywood Road from Lyric Avenue to Lydiard Avenue. The commercial uses along these intersecting corridors are typically only one tier deep, with virtually all commercial properties abutting either Shoreline Drive or Shadywood Road. Additionally, the commercial properties are not continuous, with residential properties scattered among them, making for a somewhat fragmented business district that is spread out over a mile in length from end to end. Along these two corridors the second tier of development is typically residential,; henee the Past City planning efforts for the Navarre area have identified a number of challenges to be addressed as Navarre redevelops in the years to come: 1. High traffic volumes and the existing traffic management infrastructure result in poor pedestrian accessibility. Pedestrians have limited options for crossing CR 15 or CR 19. The Park and Ride facility location and inflexibility of bus routes (partially due to the location and configuration of the P&R lot) requires that bus patrons cross CR 15 on at least one leg of their commute. 2. Parking availability is a limiting factor for expansion or redevelopment of existing City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 20 CMP Part 313. General Lande Use Plan businesses. 3. Beautification efforts are hindered by road width and right-of-way constraints as well as financial constraints. 4. Aging buildings are ripe for redevelopment yet provide low rental rates that allow local businesses to survive and thrive, reducing the incentive to redevelop. 5. There is little architectural cohesiveness among the existing buildings. Navaffe has deeided whether it wants to be urban (buildings against the stFeet, par -king in the reao-or rtibur-ba i (buildings set baek, parking a-cthe fFent)-irrehar-aet€� 6. Compatibility of certain business uses with the closely adjacent residential neighborhood can become an issue. 7. Desire to expand E"ansien of pedestrian connectivity to adjoining neighborhoods and to Dakota Rail Trail. 8. Introduction of higher density mixed use (residential and commercial) development to select sites identified in the Land Use Plan. ORONO/LONG LAKE CO a>\ al~ n GI n r n n 1~ A BUSINESS AREA An additional commercial area is designated along Wayzata Boulevard where the availability of transportation and utilities as well as proximity to similar commercial developments in Orono and Long Lake, make commercial use appropriate. Orono will coordinate its commercial development planning related to Wayzata Boulevard area with the City of Long Lake to ensure the Long Lake downtown area remains vital and viable, to focus retail development in a compact downtown retail area, and to prevent the extension of retail development west of Willow Drive in Orono. The retail development in the Wayzata Boulevard area will be community or neighborhood scale rather than "big box" regional scale development. The types of retail uses will be those that focus on providing services to the residents and businesses of Long Lake and Orono, while also drawing from the reduced traffic stream on Wayzata Boulevard resulting from opening of the new Highway 12 corridor. However, the retail development is not to draw substantial traffic from beyond Orono. The development plans for the Highway 12 area will encourage locally -owned and operated businesses that provide services to Orono and Long Lake residents. Additionally, the Highway 12 retail area will be a pedestrian -friendly area. This involves providing trails/sidewalks along the roadways providing access to the retail uses. It also involves providing public amenities that provide a sense of place and provide a gathering place for the public. Parameters for commercial use of this area are as follows: 1. The area affected is property lying between Kelley Parkway and Wayzata Boulevard, west of Willow Drive and east of Old Crystal Bay Road. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 311, Page 21 CMP Part 313. General Lande Use Plan 2. Allowed uses in this area include professional offices, limited service uses, retail uses accessory to the office use, and senior and assisted living uses. 3. Access to all uses will be via Kelley Parkway. Direct access to Willow Drive, if allowed, are intended to Abe right-in/right-out only. There shall be no direct access points onto Wayzata Boulevard. 4. "Big box" retail uses will not be allowed within this area. 9. Park/ Recreation/ Open Space Park, Recreation, and Open Space Land Use includes public and private parks and natural areas throughout the community. The recreational facilities identified on the Land Use Plan are principally large natural or open space areas which are compatible with their Rural Area location. 10. Industrial This district provides space for industrial activities for companies that are able and willing to achieve superior standards of design and environmental protection. Industrial land uses should be restricted to areas abutting major transportation corridors and individually cited so as to minimum negative impacts on residential areas. Based on their heavy hardcover needs, industrial areas should be located further than 1,000 feet from lakes. 11. Major Highway and Railway Uses Identifies land occupied by federal or state highways and railway improvements. - - - - - - - - - - P - %M. - - - I MR "I 1 141 i 11111 City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 311, Page 22 .. �. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 311, Page 22 CMP Part 3B. General Lande Use Plan 10W. . • . aLLMALE 111111 NA VARRE AREA PLAN In 2018, the City completed the Navarre Area Plan (NAP) with the aid of a Planning Consultant, WSB and Associates. This planning process focused on the land range vision and land use goals for the Navarre area, and to inform the Comprehensive Plan, for this update. The proposed land uses shown on Map 313- 3 include the findings from the Navarre Area Plan. Map 3B -3a shows the Navarre area specifically. The Navarre Planning Process employed a Planning Advisory Committee (PAC), consisting of 13 members of the Navarre area community, including business owners and operators and residents. The Planning Process included three PAC meetings, an open house in January, and a Joint Work session in April. Public comment was collected via the open house, work session, on-line surveys, and the use of a social media tool, Social Pinpoint. The full report, including the appendices detailing the comments received, and the market study, are attached in Appendix I -313-A of this chapter. The NAP evaluated several factors influencing the changes in the Navarre neighborhood over the next 20 years, including the market, traffic and transportation. The goal of the PAC was to influence and guide this change toward a Navarre area that can serve as a pseudo "downtown" of Orono, while still respecting the core Orono values as a small, rural community. A market study was completed by Maxfield and Associates, tested the land use assumptions made by the land use plan. The market study was used to adjust the planned land use map from the 2030 to the 2040 Plan. Traffic and transportation issues are a major influence on the character and change in Navarre. In 2019, Hennepin County is expected to improve the intersection of County Roads 15 and 19 (Shoreline and Shadywood Road), though these improvements are not expected to increase capacity. Capacity challenges of this section of the community are discussed in the Transportation Chapter. The findings of the Navarre area Plan are highlighted below. Interaction with Lake Minnetonka ■ As part of any redevelopment proposals involving parcels on the south side of Shoreline Drive between Carman Street and Kelly Avenue, the City should work with developers to identify opportunity areas that allow for viewing, sitting, and walking near the lakeshore. Fishing or boating connections to Lake Minnetonka are not anticipated. Future Development ■ Cautiously consider allowing increased building heights and residential density in areas along Shoreline Drive and Shadywood Road (where appropriate) to increase pedestrian traffic and encourage additional retail development. ■ Consider incorporating incentives into the zoning ordinance that allow for higher density in exchange for enhanced architectural features, underground parking, public amenities, plazas, open spaces, and recreation areas. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 23 CMP Part 313. General Lande Use Plan ■ Adopt architectural and design regulations where appropriate to require pedestrian scale design. Consider regulations for maximum building setbacks, minimum window coverage, location of parking facilities, architectural materials, fagade articulation, and entryways. ■ Review all permitted and conditional commercial uses within zoning districts along Shoreline Drive and Shadywood Road to ensure that the types of desired businesses are allowed in Navarre. Types of allowable uses should focus on small scale neighborhood goods and services and avoid those that do not have a large customer draw. ■ Consider reduced parking requirements for businesses that provide bicycle parking. ■ Explore acquiring additional property for providing shared parking and periodic public gatherings for Navarre businesses. ■ Host a developer round table to discuss obstacles to development in Navarre. Be prepared to address those obstacles. ■ Consider developing a facade improvement program to encourage the revitalization of neglected commercial buildings. Revolving loan funds may keep the money working within Navarre. Transportation Improvements ■ Work with Hennepin County on a plan for future improvements to Shoreline Drive and Shadywood Road that improves safety and mobility for pedestrians and cyclists. Consider eliminating some of the free right turns at the northwest, southwest, and southeast corners to help narrow the intersection, reduce speeds, and improve vehicle predictability. Check in with Hennepin County staff bimonthly and use the Navarre Small Area Plan PAC as the review committee for potential improvements. ■ Explore options for adding pedestrian and streetscaping amenities with any roadway improvements such as wider sidewalks, decorative pavement, landscaping, benches, and other ornamental features. ■ Meet with Hennepin County transportation staff to discuss potential improvements to alternate arterials that would relieve traffic pressure on Shoreline Drive and Shadywood Road through Navarre. Discuss options to reduce traffic volumes on Shoreline Drive and Shadywood Road. ■ Consider plans for access and the impact of expected traffic volume on Shoreline Drive and Shadywood Road with any redevelopment along these roads. Work with Hennepin County on developing an access management plan for properties that may redevelop along these roadways. Shadywood Trail Connection ■ Continue to have discussions with Hennepin County and Three Rivers Park District regarding the trail connection along Shadywood Road to keep the process moving forward. ■ Engage with impacted property owners early to identify necessary mitigation required. ■ Conduct additional public engagement regarding the trail as part of the community engagement surrounding the intersection improvements. Community Events ■ Encourage the development of a community festival. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 311, Page 24 CMP Part 313. General Lande Use Plan ■ Consider collaboration with nearby communities on an event that incorporates multiple destinations along the trail. ■ Utilize the city -owned parking lot on the north side of Shoreline Drive and west of Shadywood Road as a possible location for hosting tents, bands, and vendors associated with an event. ■ Should the block northwest of Shoreline Drive and Shadywood Lane (Maxfield Study Block 4) redevelop, that redevelop should include a space available for public gatherings such as an annual festival. ■ Leverage an annual festival as an opportunity to do enhanced branding for Navarre. ■ Explore opportunities for collaboration with the Mound farmers' market to organize a farmers' market along the Dakota Rail Trail in Navarre. ■ Consider the formation of a Navarre Business Association. Tear Downs ■ Review development standards applicable to single-family homes in Navarre. Review to ensure that adequate controls are in place to ensure that new development is compatible with the existing character and scale of the neighborhood, while still encouraging the redevelopment of blighted properties. Such standards could include requirements for floor area ratio, height, hardcover, architectural materials, landscaping, and accessory structures. ■ Proactively address blighted properties through the City's code enforcement process so that existing homes are well maintained. Consider revisions to the City's code enforcement process or adopting fines if non-compliance is an issue. • Review its demolition and construction regulations. If the regulation updates require addition administration and monitoring by City staff, consideration should be given to increasing the demolition permit fee commensurate with the addition staffing demand. WHA TS CHANGED This update of the Comprehensive Plan introduces higher residential density along Kelley Parkway and Wayzata blvd, lowers density for the properties adjacent to the fire station on Willow, removes residential mixed use density along Shadywood, and introduces additional properties to potential mixed use development/ redevelopment along Shoreline in Navarre. These changes are all reflected on maps 313-3a and 313-3b. FUTURE DEVELOPMENT/STAGED DEVELOPMENT The City does not intend to establish a staged growth plan, limiting a property owner from the use of their land, provided the development can be accomplished within the performance standards, policies and requirements of the Community Management Plan. The Ci . anticipates its _growth to occur in the same manner has been employed over the last three decades. The majority of subdivision based growth will occur via the splitting of larger lots into subdivisions of less than 6 new building sites. Small areas of the community are conducive to higher density. These projects have served to accommodate our aging community, and provide additional housing and neighborhood options not prevalent in Orono. The City's new residential ,growth within the MUSA area is expected in one of 5 primary areas, depicted on Map 3134 Planned Development areas, and summarized in Table 3134, Predicted Growth in Sewered Areas. The table predicts ,growth over the next 2 decades and identifies the City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 25 CMP Part 313. General Lande Use Plan t MUSA part and the Traffic Analysis Zone impacted. Assuming development at the minimum range, the city will meet its household growth for 2030 and 2040. The cites maintains opportunity for property owners to provide housing to meet affordability goals. The Net Density for the sewered areas of Orono identified in Table 313-4, is summarized for clarity on Table 3B-5. The 891 units planned to be served by sanitary sewer services over the next 20 plus years yields a net density of 4.16 units per acre. Predicted Growth in Sewered Areas, Net Density Table 3134 A B C D E F G H I Name Land Use Category Net Residential Acres (NRA) Lowest Guided Density Predicted# of units (C xD) 2021-2030 Growth (Households) 2031-2040 Growth (Households) MUSA Part TAZ Zone Area A Dumas Urban Medium High/Mixed Use Residential 10-20 u/a 25.1 10 251 251 XXXII 921 Eisinger Flats Urban High (20-25 u/a) 10 20 200 200 L 921 Area A Total 35.1 451 451 0 Area B St. Thomas Prop Urban High (20-25 a/a) 3.69 20 73.8 73.8 X 922 2060 Wayzata Urban High (20-25 u/a) 2.51 20 50.2 50.2 X 923 Area B Total 6.2 124 50.2 73.8 Area C, North Fire Station Area Hwy 12 frontage Urban Medium 1.71 3 5.13 5.13 XXXIV 929 Garden Prop. Urban Medium 3.41 3 10.23 10.23 XXXIV 929 Glendale Drive Urban Medium 3.82 3 11.46 11.46 XXXIV 929 Area C Total 8.94 26.82 0 26.82 Area D (Sewer extension into large lot areas/ Lake protection) Urban Low Density 690 Brown Rd Urban Low (0.5-2 Units /Acre) 18 0.5 9 9 XL 927 740 Brown Rd Urban Low (0.5-2 Units /Acre) 3.18 0.5 1.59 1.59 XL 927 3400 Fox Urban Low (0.5-2 Units /Acre) 5.26 0.5 2 2 XXXI 954 3295 Fox Urban Low (0.5-2 Units /Acre) 4.23 0.5 2 2 X VU 931 3345 Fox Urban Low (0.5-2 Units /Acre) 4.69 0.5 2 2 XXXI 931 3350 Fox Urban Low (0.5-2 Units /Acre) 7.12 0.5 3 3 XXXI 954 3320 Fox Urban Low (0.5-2 Units /Acre) 3.06 0.5 1 1 XXXI 954 3300 Fox Urban Low (0.5-2 Units /Acre) 4.55 0.5 2 2 XXXI 954 3280 Fox Urban Low (0.5-2 Units /Acre) 4.95 0.5 2 2 XXXI 954 3250 Fox Urban Low (0.5-2 Units /Acre) 5.31 0.5 2 2 XXXI 954 3200 Fox Urban Low (0.5-2 Units /Acre) 4.12 0.5 2 2 XXXI 954 3175 Fox Urban Low (0.5-2 Units /Acre) 7.49 0.5 3 3 XXXI 954 3125 Fox Urban Low (0.5-2 Units /Acre) 7.44 0.5 3 3 XXXI 954 825 Old Crystal Bay R Urban Low (0.5-2 Units /Acre) 17.61 0.5 8 8 XXXI 954 1700 Shoreline Urban Low (0.5-2 Units /Acre) 20.14 0.5 10 10 XXXXVII 955 1100 Millston Rd Urban Low (0.5-2 Units /Acre) 12.7 0.5 6 6 XXXXVll 955 1003 Wildhurst Urban Low (0.5-2 Units /Acre) 10 0.5 4 4 I 953 Area D Total 139.85 62.59 0 62.59 City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 311, Page 26 CMP Part 3B. General Lande Use Plan Predicted Growth in Sewered Areas, Net Density Table 313-4 (Continued) A B C D E F G H I Net Lowest Predicted # of 2021-2030 2031-2040 Name Land Use Category Residential Guided units (C x Growth Growth MUSA Part TAZ Acres (NRA) Density D) (Households) (Households) Zone Area E Navarre Area 3880 Shoreline Urban Medium High/ Mined Use (Hennepin Count Residential 10-20 u/a 9.37 10 93.7 93.7 I 958 Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use 3890 Shoreline 0.68 10 6.8 6.8 I 958 Residential 10-20 u/a Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use 3860 Shoreline 0.64 10 6.4 6.4 I 958 Residential 10-20 u/a Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use 3850 Shoreline Residential 10-20 u/a 0.78 10 7.8 7.8 1 958 Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use 3800 Shoreline 0.7 10 7 7 1 958 Residential 10-20 u/a Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use 3596 Shoreline 0.62 10 6.2 6.2 1 958 Residential 10-20 u/a Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use 2389 Blaine Residential 10-20 u/a 1.11 10 11.1 11.1 I 958 Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use 3574 Shoreline Residential 10-20 u/a 0.47 10 4.7 4.7 I 958 Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use 3572 Shoreline 0.31 10 3.1 3.1 I 958 Residential 10-20 u/a Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use 3542 Shoreline 0.46 10 4.6 4.6 I 958 Residential 10-20 u/a Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use 3502 Shoreline Residential 10-20 u/a 0.31 10 3.1 3.1 T 958 Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use 3496 Shoreline 0.31 10 3.1 3.1 I 958 Residential 10-20 u/a Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use 3480 Shoreline 0.15 10 1.5 1.5 I 958 Residential 10-20 u/a Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use 3472 Shoreline Residential 10-20 u/a 0.15 10 1.5 1.5 T 958 3468 Shoreline Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use 0.15 10 1.5 1.5 1 958 Residential 10-20 u/a Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use 3465 Lyric 0.62 10 6.2 6.2 1 958 Residential 10-20 u/a Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use 3440 Shoreline Residential 10-20 u/a 0.15 10 1.5 0.9 1 958 Forfiet Land Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use 0.15 10 1.5 1.5 1 958 Residential 10-20 u/a Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use Forfiet Land 01 10 1 1 1 958 Residential 10-20 u/a Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use Parking Lot 0.86 10 8.6 8.6 1 958 Residential 10-20 u/a 2520 Shadywood Urban Medium Density (3-10 u/a) 2.02 3 6.06 6.06 l 956 3770 Shoreline Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use irestation Residential 10-20u/a 4 10 40 40 1 958 Area E Total 24.11 226.96 46.06 180.3 Planned Totals 214.2 891 547 344 City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 27 CMP Part 3B. General Lande Use Plan Table 313-5 Net Density by Land Use Planned Development Area - Net Residential Acres (NRA) # of units (NRA x lowest guided density) Urban Low Residential (0.5-2 u/a� 139.9 62.5 Urban Medium Residential (3-10 a/a) _ 11.0 32.9 Urban Medium High/ Mixed Use - 47.2 471.9 Residential (10-20 u/a) Urban High Density Residential (20- - 16.2 324.0 25 1!/q Totals 214.2 891 Net Density of Sewered Growth 4.16 This Net Density of Sewered Growth is consistent with the Emerging Suburban Edge designation requiring 3-5 units per acre. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 28 CMP Part 313. General Lande Use Plan Growth in Sewered Areas, Net Density Table 3134 (Continued) A B C D E F G H J K L M Status: Net Land Use Acres Lowest Predicted # Category PID Vacant, Gross Residential Guided 2020-2030 2030-2040 MUSA Part TAZ Zone (PlannedDev. Agriculture, Acres of units Growth Growth Areas) Resid. Density (ExF) Developed (NRA) Area E Navarre Area 3880 Shoreline Urban Medium (Hennepin High/MixedUse 1711723330151 Developed 9.37 9.37 10 93.7 93-7 1 958 Count) Residential Urban Medium 3890 Shoreline High/MixedUse 1711723330004 Developed 0.68 0.68 10 6.8 6.8 1 958 Residential Urban Medium 3860 Shoreline High/MixedUse 1711723330005 Developed 0.64 0.64 10 6.4 6.4 1 958 Residential Urban Medium 3850 Shoreline High/Mixed Use 1711723330006 Developed 0.78 0.78 10 7.8 7.8 1 958 Residential Urban Medium 3800 Shoreline High/MixedUse 1711723330007 Developed 0.7 0.7 10 7 7 I 958 Residential UrbanM edium 3596 Shoreline High/MixedUse 1711723430107 Developed 0.62 0.62 10 62 62 1 958 Residential Urban Medium 2389 Blaine High/ Mixed Use 1711723340012 Developed 1.11 1.11 10 11.1 11.1 1 958 Residential Urban Medium 3574 Shoreline High/MixedUse 1711723430149 Developed 0.47 0.47 10 4.7 4.7 I 958 Residential Urban Medium 3572 Shoreline High/MixedUse 1711723430151 Developed 0.31 0.31 10 3.1 3.1 I 958 Residential Urban Medium 3542 Shoreline High/ Mixed Use 1711723430113 Developed 0.46 0.46 10 4.6 4.6 1 958 Residential Urban Medium 3502 Shoreline High/MixedUse 1711723430114 Developed 0.31 0.31 10 3.1 3.1 I 958 Residential Urban Medium 3496 Shoreline High/ Mixed Use 1711723430155 Developed 0.31 0.31 10 3.1 3.1 I 958 Residential Urban Medium 3480 Shoreline High/MixedUse 1711723430093 Developed 0.15 0.15 10 1.5 1.5 I 958 Residential Urban Medium 3472 Shoreline High/MixedUse 1711723430094 Developed 0.15 0.15 10 1.5 1.5 1 958 Residential UrbanMedium 3468 Shoreline High/Mixed Use 1711723430095 Developed 0.15 0.15 Itl 1.5 1.5 1 958 Residential Urban Medium 3465 Lyric High/ Mixed Use 1711723430086 Developed 0.62 0.62 10 6.2 3.72 I 958 Residential Urban Medium 3440 Shoreline High/MixedUse 1711723430142 Developed 0.15 0.15 10 1.5 0.9 1 958 Residential Urban Medium Forfiet Land High/MixedUse 1711723430085 Vacant 0.15 0.15 10 1.5 1.5 1 958 Residential Urban Medium Forfiet Land High/MixedUse 1711723430084 Vacant 0.1 0.1 10 l 1 I 958 Residential Urban Medium Parking Lot High/MixedUse 1711723430083 Developed 0.86 0.86 10 8.6 8.6 I 958 Residential Urban Medium 2520 Shadywood 2011723110038 Vacant 2.63 2.02 3 6.06 6.06 I 956 Density 3770 Shoreline Urban Medium 1711723340086 Developed 4.33 4 6 24 24 1 958 Firestation) High Area ETotal 25.05 24.11 210.96 68.88 139 Planned Totals 280.0 221.6 934.0 1 413.9 517.1 City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 29 CMP Part 3B. General Lande Use Plan 63% of the land (and 6% of the number of households) identified for future sewered growth falls within Orono's Urban Low Density areas. Development of these areas typically follows a piecemeal pattern as individual properties split into 1-3 units, where lots can accommodate subdivision. 20% of the land (and 40% of the identified for future growth) is in the Navarre area; Due to the costs associated with redevelopment, including acquisition of multiple parcels, and the city's conservative view of public financial aid to private sector development, it is anticipated that this growth will be slow. The balance of the Dredicted sewered erowth will occur on the remaining larizer parcels where municipal services are available current]. Table 3B-6 below illustrates that based on predicted development patterns, the City can meet its projected growth in the sewered areas. Table 313-6 Planned Development in MUSA areas by Decade Planned Developmen Area Land Use Categor- Net Acres (NRA) # of units density) uAits per Hire Area A Tran u;Medium, yr ffi+- r�xx 3r6 4 383.6 �� Afea B Ur -ban -1-2-.3 250.0 24.4 Afea C Urban Mediu . $ 9 -2" 3--.0 A „ea D Urban i39.9 62-.6 4-.4 Ar -ea E Urban Medii±m Mixed Use, T.Tc-vivan High, Medium 24-1- 2�e Surplus (Deficit) 24 63% of the land (and 6% of the number of households) identified for future sewered growth falls within Orono's Urban Low Density areas. Development of these areas typically follows a piecemeal pattern as individual properties split into 1-3 units, where lots can accommodate subdivision. 20% of the land (and 40% of the identified for future growth) is in the Navarre area; Due to the costs associated with redevelopment, including acquisition of multiple parcels, and the city's conservative view of public financial aid to private sector development, it is anticipated that this growth will be slow. The balance of the Dredicted sewered erowth will occur on the remaining larizer parcels where municipal services are available current]. Table 3B-6 below illustrates that based on predicted development patterns, the City can meet its projected growth in the sewered areas. Table 313-6 Planned Development in MUSA areas by Decade Households Year 2010 2016 2020 Est. 2030 Est. Change from 2016 2040 Est Change from 2030 Households (all City) 2826 3037 3200 3,560 523 3,900 340 Growth predicted 547 _ 343 (MUSA areas only) Surplus (Deficit) 24 3 Source: Metropolitan Council System Statement, City Utility Accounts, Table 3B-4 Based on the planned ,growth identified in Table 3B-4, there are no negative impacts to wastewater or transportation systems. At build out, additional water storage and/or conservation measures may be necessary in the Navarre area, as described in Chapter 4C of this Plan. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 30 CMP Part 3B. General Lande Use Plan EMPLOYMENT Employment levels in the City have grown slowly, and are expected to remain static over the next two decades, as shown in Figure 3B-1 below and Table 313-1. 2000 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Employment 1970 - 2040 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2020 2030 2040 Figure 3B-12 Employment As illustrated in Figure 313-2, Education services are highest employer by industry at 32% of all jobs in Orono. Retail trade is the third highest employer at 15% of jobs. The City anticipates employment growth to occur as existing businesses evolve and grow. With the exception of new commercial areas along the west side of Shadywood, the City does not anticipate the expansion of commercial areas in the city. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 31 CMP Part 313. General Lande Use Plan Employment by Industry in Orono Real Estate and Rental and Leasing, Professional and Technical Services, S%— Retail Trade. All Dther Industries, Gare and Social Assistance, 5% }ublic Administration. 4% .-FFnance and Insurance. 4% Other Services, Ex. Public Admin.. 4% struction, 3% nufacturing, 2% ,nnistrative and Waste Services, 1% Services, 32% 11 Source, Quarterly Census of Employment: and Wages, Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development, 2nd quarter data: Metropolitan Council staff have estimated some data points. Figure 3B-2-3 Employment by Industry HISTORIC SITE PRESER VA TION PLAN Orono began to develop in the mid 19th Century, and many of the vestiges of early development are still present, in the form of standing buildings and structures, foundations, fence lines, roadway corridors, place names and other more subtle reminders of the past. Additionally, due to Orono's unique location on the shores of Lake Minnetonka, prehistoric native burial mound sites are known to have existed in various locations throughout the City. Orono has long encouraged the preservation of historic sites and structures, but has never adopted a formal preservation plan. Because no formal plan has been in place, many historic properties have been lost or significantly changed as development and redevelopment progressed. The subdividing of many of the old lakeshore estate properties has typically left a stately mansion surrounded by modern high-end homes rather than formal grounds. The City is fortunate that the West Hennepin Pioneer's Association Museum is located in neighboring Long Lake, with its members serving as an invaluable resource for helping to preserve the past. Historic Preservation Policies 1. In order to ensure that Orono's heritage is preserved, the City will consider development of a Historic Preservation Plan. The intent of such a plan would be to establish goals, policies and local regulations resulting in preservation of historic sites, buildings, place names, corridors, etc. 2. Orono will work with the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) in determining whether properties proposed for development contain historically significant resources which should be preserved. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 311, Page 32 CMP Part 3B. General Lande Use Plan APPENDIX Appendix -4 --Maps Map 3B-1 Urban and Rural Areas Map 3B-2 Existing Land Use Map 3B -2B Existing Land Use -Navarre Area Map 3B-3 Proposed Land Use Map 3B -3B Proposed Land Use Navarre Area Map 3B-4 Planned Development Areas Appendix 11313-A Navarre Area Plan and ..... path, . City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3B, Page 33 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN a, Turner Road s 0 0 Drake Or Q Painter FLoad N W Branch Road 0 0 U)LIZ Sunnyfield Road E rJ vy E o Z � � O w v 2 Game Farm Road E g 0 S Dutch Lake Legend Defined Urban and Rural Areas November 2018 J 12 „ • . N Moon ti 1.... .._.._.._.._.. .._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._..�..�..�..�..�..�..�..� a Tro`G< • 6th Ave N` ? •1 • • c Z ® d I Spring 11%lI Z Sugd • z a w Kelley Pk.N`— .aQ pom !0 1Z9 "I co 'Q1— JO ao, N 1 2 Daniels St t , a�' T L �• I y 1 d �Moline Road m .1 Grand A �OrcFiard'Ln / Ola<o0 LL ° 1 SOW p e �' 9�ake + 19N W (n 1 •� �` L..• • •4=' �a1'siq �.• \ ,�', .. Wayzata Blvd Wim e d •r City Limits Lakes & Ponds ail MII 4e - ore1!ne Or Lafayette 1 •I �yricAve _.._..�, Bay �' 1 T e • e ! Sprinc; 1 Park j Bay ► t ,�. 1 t 2040 MUSA Rivers & Streams .�•• • 0 3,500 e Feet n `' • Casco Point Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, �•. Hennepin County, MnDOT �o -pHi Wayzata Bay Min Ave BOLTN /1 & MENK Real People. Real Solutions. LJ z c r J 0 a, a � rA�ve� o E Ave N ure Road --I I 11�1 L rT\) I J o pay ply Urban and Rural Areas Defined Rural Recreational Areas Trail Defined Urban Railroad Right - Areas of -Way Map 313-1 1 1 1 r Fox St L " 151 1 '0 2 ' y ~�O • 1 U 00 \ 1 _,... l Shore or Jenning Bay b71/ 1 �J I ♦ �. 1 Harrison ! .. — .�•• • �' • 1 Bay •r City Limits Lakes & Ponds ail MII 4e - ore1!ne Or Lafayette 1 •I �yricAve _.._..�, Bay �' 1 T e • e ! Sprinc; 1 Park j Bay ► t ,�. 1 t 2040 MUSA Rivers & Streams .�•• • 0 3,500 e Feet n `' • Casco Point Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, �•. Hennepin County, MnDOT �o -pHi Wayzata Bay Min Ave BOLTN /1 & MENK Real People. Real Solutions. LJ z c r J 0 a, a � rA�ve� o E Ave N ure Road --I I 11�1 L rT\) I J o pay ply Urban and Rural Areas Defined Rural Recreational Areas Trail Defined Urban Railroad Right - Areas of -Way Map 313-1 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN Turner Road Drake Dr Legend Defined Urban and Rural Areas November 2018 J12 Moon 1.._._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._..__.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._ �e Tro.\G< 6th Ave,N ? •1 \ • c z d 1 Spring op p v 3 Suga�� 11%lI •z i a Kelly Pk�Ny �Q p°m �w0 e 1 JOe - ao, �0 12 Daniels St • t , 1 1 � c :amu T O1 ILL Moline Road m 1 d� m v Grand A . rchardq / Lj �.• ado ; CL 70 a ♦ e ` 79 1 Ave BOLTN /1 & MENK Real People. Real Solutions. I__I z c r J 0 a, a � Ave 19 N • Road vs l O i • , +°. �® .,. �,'4� 1 Rio, • L .•� �. W ayzata Blviced 1 ,PonyLyg` — • . — 12 Park s 1 w + p Lake St / o 1� L.._. rn ��"� Fox St • �° 2 o Wayzata Bay 26 a N N M °2 N FLoad Painter d ' W Branch Road 1 LIZm Sunnyfield Road E rJ Ni CI Z d i � o Game Farm Road E a S 0 Dutch _ Lake Legend Defined Urban and Rural Areas November 2018 J12 Moon 1.._._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._..__.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._.._ �e Tro.\G< 6th Ave,N ? •1 \ • c z d 1 Spring op p v 3 Suga�� 11%lI •z i a Kelly Pk�Ny �Q p°m �w0 e 1 JOe - ao, �0 12 Daniels St • t , 1 1 � c :amu T O1 ILL Moline Road m 1 d� m v Grand A . rchardq / Lj �.• ado ; CL 70 a ♦ e ` 79 1 Ave BOLTN /1 & MENK Real People. Real Solutions. I__I z c r J 0 a, a � Ave 19 N • Road vs l O i • , +°. �® .,. �,'4� 1 Rio, • L .•� �. W ayzata Blviced 1 ,PonyLyg` — • . — 12 Park s 1 w + p Lake St / o 1� L.._. rn ��"� Fox St • �° 2 o Wayzata Bay .r City Limits Lakes & Ponds Min 1 <yric1Ave — • • —, gay �' 1 Azure Road i �• �'! �'• ' �♦♦ par Urban and Rural Areas e j ' i• Defined Rural Sprinc; 1 �. Areas Park j Bay ! ` •�• ��. Defined Urban 1 t 2040 MUSA Rivers & Streams •�•• _y �%II 0 1 �• % Lel ♦ Areas e •• a niiiJ� �' • Casco PointVAS W 1 .i 0 3,500 Feet Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT E Map 3B-1 Ave N PI Recreational Trail Railroad Right - of -Way _,... -Shore or ing JennBay 1 r 1 T _ Crysta) �ur�r,� •� �.• Bay Point.- oint••Harrison • Harrison c .. — �.' �' Bay 1 1 �• ..♦ D� rte' — . • — .. — .. — - t � shoreline I � I 3� =- Highland. `�J SJR •• Lafayette I Q Rutledge Road .r City Limits Lakes & Ponds Min 1 <yric1Ave — • • —, gay �' 1 Azure Road i �• �'! �'• ' �♦♦ par Urban and Rural Areas e j ' i• Defined Rural Sprinc; 1 �. Areas Park j Bay ! ` •�• ��. Defined Urban 1 t 2040 MUSA Rivers & Streams •�•• _y �%II 0 1 �• % Lel ♦ Areas e •• a niiiJ� �' • Casco PointVAS W 1 .i 0 3,500 Feet Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT E Map 3B-1 Ave N PI Recreational Trail Railroad Right - of -Way 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN r Mf Turner Road 12 Sta„ - .� .., o m Drake Dr = c 6th Ave N Z Z o � r Inset 1 as z co T V 12 Moline Road c a w��, ca + v w _a CL P �O Ftoa d Painter Y W Branch Road Road Dutch Lake �ELynwBU Legend �• •r : City Limits Wetlands r ROad 3 19N r � a �o� l ys'de y F Stubbs ��+ I Bay Lake c Vllay Long atalad g ,.., . `• a� ielsSt •1• ;+ Grand A Orchard rn Fox St00 r County Road 151" W �' Browns North T 9i Tanager Ba r ``O Arm Maxwell Lake y �o v T Bay French 1 r Marsh Forest , Jenning's 1 Bay 1 \ r a;� ,Nest rm Harrison Bay 1 Lakes & Ponds Rivers & Streams 0 3,500 Feet Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT N Shore Dr 1 1 Smith Bracketts 1 Bay Point •• 1 Crystal L,`- ••� •'�• Bay Point ••� •. • �, Like j 1 i 1 1 . i Lafayette 1 1ve _ .. _ • Bay �• .� . Inset 2 y •�•• •�•• .�• e i Carman's i BayCa •�. I . 10-1 ♦• d • Por 1 LZ. .�. R .j o oad � .. Lydiard flS 70 s L e Kelley F 12 Inset 1 Existing Land Use November 2018 V/ew Inset 2 RHighland r 4 Rutledge Road Azure Road Lake Ave Park g1 -e 0 M 10 Land Use Classes Rural Preserve (1 unit/ 5 acres) Rural Residential (1 unit / 2 acres) Island Residential Urban Low Density Residential (0.5 - 2 units / acre) Urban Medium Density Residential (3 - 10 units / acre) BOLTN /1 & MENK Real People. Real Solutions. 23rd Ave N Dickeys Z Lake 'o M - 25 units / acre) Y � c 3 Office 0 Industrial m` •.E - z v mC _ �. Lake c Vllay Long atalad g ,.., . `• a� ielsSt •1• ;+ Grand A Orchard rn Fox St00 r County Road 151" W �' Browns North T 9i Tanager Ba r ``O Arm Maxwell Lake y �o v T Bay French 1 r Marsh Forest , Jenning's 1 Bay 1 \ r a;� ,Nest rm Harrison Bay 1 Lakes & Ponds Rivers & Streams 0 3,500 Feet Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT N Shore Dr 1 1 Smith Bracketts 1 Bay Point •• 1 Crystal L,`- ••� •'�• Bay Point ••� •. • �, Like j 1 i 1 1 . i Lafayette 1 1ve _ .. _ • Bay �• .� . Inset 2 y •�•• •�•• .�• e i Carman's i BayCa •�. I . 10-1 ♦• d • Por 1 LZ. .�. R .j o oad � .. Lydiard flS 70 s L e Kelley F 12 Inset 1 Existing Land Use November 2018 V/ew Inset 2 RHighland r 4 Rutledge Road Azure Road Lake Ave Park g1 -e 0 M 10 Land Use Classes Rural Preserve (1 unit/ 5 acres) Rural Residential (1 unit / 2 acres) Island Residential Urban Low Density Residential (0.5 - 2 units / acre) Urban Medium Density Residential (3 - 10 units / acre) BOLTN /1 & MENK Real People. Real Solutions. 23rd Ave N Dickeys Z Lake 'o M - 25 units / acre) Commercial / c 3 Office 0 Industrial m` SugarH,00 v mC _ �. Iv Dr _ s� dQ, a� Map 313-2a Park, Recreational, and Open Space Undeveloped Right -of -Way Urban High Density Residential (20 - 25 units / acre) Commercial / Office Industrial Map 313-2a Park, Recreational, and Open Space Undeveloped Right -of -Way 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN co M , V Turner Road 12 Sta„ r Ave NB Drake Dr r c 6th o - z v \' !Lake �'� r r tir.: Spring zClassen z o o r y a m L� R aL �° Inset .4 1 Long 'Mao _. z a aaghd ,�• • `• • Lake . r a r - " R �N Daniels St t 12 OI V Moline Roadc r � m U .� Grand A Orc►jard��n Q y.� ow. /tOao, oIt ml i 19 N r ot °'ys/de - � -- Stubbs Road Bay J✓ Painter �r Fox St L ; .. • W Branch Road% - - - ,.., County Road 151 T 9 North ` �VBrowns 41 rages Bay Arm !� Maxwell `: ' - Lake 1 o v . Bay • I �' French ' I. 1 Sunnyfield Road d Forest Marsh Vis` Lake _ Shore T- 1 + Dr Jenning's I r y BaY`.. Smith Bracketts 1 r Bay Point Dutch Crystal Bohns ••A%. Lake > Bay Point.*♦ �•. W Harrison ' •♦ •' .. nn ,� r „� 1 Bay 1 1 (V Lynwood B1 E E• • — .. .. ��• o w V Shoreline Dr TF Lafayette a ,1 �•A -�yric'Ave r — .. Bay Legend Inset 2 yf rM f j' .`.• . f.. ♦. e y �. ♦ • ♦' City Limits Lakes & Ponds 1 -? H � �' •� i • Carman's y ' Bay •�• ♦. Wetlands Rivers & Streams �' ♦•• 0 3,500 Feet , 1 Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, Po. • �•. �. Hennepin County, MnDOT " -' • - / 1 �_ Existing Land Use November 2018 BOLTN /1 & MENK Real People. Real Solutions. /Q 22-� ��r - R t - 23rd Ave N z = z Fr X • -r - m Yo 0 IV View Dr — a°, . _ o I 3 I-- co L U v Dicke a`te- O � Kelley_Pkw.Y s _ Sugarivoo - t Wayzata fake Inset 1 3rd Ave N a `° od 1 ern Ave 6ayvie e • t. `. North O rystat PI�_z� •°'' ry a m Ai 2<< �� d _ Q Olive t 12 i i ;.. J Ac,, Z? oa Pe F°46% 9� Inset 2 WI F go Land Use Classes Rural Preserve Urban High (1 unit/ 5 acres) Density Residential (20 - 25 units / acre) Rural Residential (1 unit / 2 acres) CommercialFFF / Office Island 3� Highland Avo Residential Industrial Azure Road Urban Low Park, Lake Ave 9ve Density Residential (0.5 Recreational, park - 2 units / acre) and Open Space � Urban Medium Density Undeveloped Residential (3 - 10 units / acre) Right -of -Way v A M o 0, 0 Map 313-2a Crown Dr -� 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN 1 I � 1 I �.. _.. _.. _.. _.. _.. _.. _.. _.. _. c4� ` Togo Road W Arm Road Warren Ave d„ Ln Northern W Arm Dr --Zz , ing St Shoreline Dr c0- Del Otero Ave I I• : I : I : 1 1 1 i Spnng 1 / Park i Bay / 1 c Livingston Ave S �dS�o Carman's q�e ,. Bay Casco Point Existing Land Use - Navarre 1• 1 N.,,\,view Road I rN Westwood Road x Ln Lla'110-0ks- J 0 � a ±Old County Rod., l November 2018 Arcola % Lafayette .._.._.._.._.._..,.. Bay r ' R ' m ' m �. a •, O I I I om ' • r 3 i Land Use Classes BOLTN /1 & MENK Real People. Real Solutions. 4h nt St Cresce Rural Preserve High Density (1 unit/ 5 acres) Residential (7- 20 units / acre) Rural Residential (1 Commercial / unit / 2 acres) Office Island Industrial Residential Low Density Park, Residential (0.5 Recreational, - 2 units / acre) and Open Space Medium Density Residential (2-7 Undeveloped units /acre) Right -of -Way Map 3B -2b 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN f O�hd Togo Road %y J A °O 'f Ln �I - � ,Rollo' Cr, �a —: l.Crystal�Pl�� y��e . &V Arm Road> �A Northern Av e a OG Warren Ave W Arm Dr ,,..�-•Livingston Ave _ , �e q� A M 17�\\ Qi Legend Shoreline Dr X1 Det Otero Ave', o° � .c 1 :, 1 Sp ring 1 Park Bay 1 1 •r : City Limits Lakes & Ponds Wetlands Rivers & Streams 0 1,000 Feet Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT M Lyric Ave 097-7-7-7-11 15 1 1V—O iew N° a !Old County Ro,, Westwoo Existing Land Use - Navarre BOLTON November 2018 & M E N K Real People. Real Solutions. iia Vl Lafayette �e Ur 1 .._.._ aBay ` ,• �.,✓ e/z �- 96e a ;.\ 1\1 'a � mom _ ` Ir ,! I 'O -�' _ —/1 _ i� Land Use Classes man's • dd I ♦ ♦ l,asco ;♦ Po in t 4h Rural Preserve High Density (1 unit/ 5 acres) Residential (7- 20 units / acre) Rural Residential (1 Commercial / unit / 2 acres) Office Island Industrial Residential Low Density Park, Residential (0.5 Recreational, - 2 units / acre) and Open Space Medium Density Residential (2-7 Undeveloped units /acre) Right -of -Way Map 3B -2b 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN I<SLI inn a ke Turner Road coo12Sta„ o 1m �r Drake Dr = �' ;� ., r o A ' r a o . U r, •� z i IMF - z leak W Inset 1 D° 0r Q -°tea p1°p o 1 eA c c 3 GJ L Off' V Moline Road O CL wh Ro 3 19 N 1 ad U) N Road m Painter 01 W Branch Road Sunnyfield Road E 1 Stubbs y r Bay J Fox St County Road 1511 W North Arm Maxwell v Bay r y r Forest Lake e Shor Or z Lake E: �. H � .ay2 Long .L. ata B d �+�• . ` • �. Daniels St •1 1 ! Grand A Orchard Denning 1 \ Bay 1 ai Nest Dutch �o'Jr 1 , Crystal Bohns ••, ♦��. 1 Lake > Bay Point,* ♦ • . W1; ' L Harrison • • , Bay EE ynwood Blvd V Shoreline or 1 Lafayette a .1 ^<yric Ave _ • • — .• Bay Legend Inset 2 _' •r : City Limits Lakes & Ponds 1 Carman's Bay 1 Wetlands Rivers & Streams ♦• • 0 3,500 �'� ♦•� • Feet ' . Ca • • 1 Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, •. • Po.. Hennepin County, MnDOT Future Land Use November 2018 D _.._.._.._ __.._.._ a;� .1 0 N Orin oa �a 9 Nill � 1 L; v L ke a O Kelley Pkwy I 1 Olq 1 9<ake,Q . Inset 1 3rdAve N O /� dd . L . Browns Tanager Bay Lake French 1 Marsh 1 1 Smith Bracketts 1 Bay Point M BOLTN & MENK Real People. Real Solutions. 22 23rd Ave N z a M View Dr Q'° c z o o —�' Dickey Lame G` Northern Ave Crystal PI BaY�/+ a aOlive 12 R; Livingston AveFO e i LyriclAve NW ire/ � - Shoreline Dr o ♦ ` �4 O 0 O A� O caa % �,�� ap. PeI& e Inset 2 _ 1 1 z'A Highland 1 � Q—Rutledge•Road ♦•.. •)-AzurefRoad+ LakelAve i • ♦♦ park q�e i wI (- W o d Land Use Classes Rural Preserve (1 unit / 5 acres) Rural Residential (1 unit / 2 acres) Island Residential Urban Low Density Residential (0.5 - 2 units / acre) Urban Medium Density Residential (3 - 10 units/ acre) Map 3B -3a Urban Medium High Density Residential / Mixed Use (10 - 20 units / acre) Urban High Density Residential (20 - 25 units / acre) Commercial / Office rIndustrial Park, Recreational, and Open Space Map 3B -3a 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN Lake °_.� s • - o tr r Drake Dr = r v 3 U r r, o° nQ-°tea o OeA 0 0 V Moline Road o r CL Painter Ftoa d W Branch Road 19 N • aYside 4 044 r WX � r �c County Road 1511 W2- �r r OO„ -v L" :r_ - - Sta„ ...� ..� . m R 6th Ave N_ o 0 z r m __ 3 v ` Q ° R 'I - -moo r' 3 _ \� m m / Inset 1' Wayla Long \�.-/ ... ta; Blvd 12 °'Daiielsst Q .. r .a m J v - t+ Grand A Orchard d V) + in P Future Land Use November 2018 M BOLTN & MENK Real People. Real Solutions. Katrina Turner Road coo12 23rd Ave N `m c z z 1 °w V+ew Dr �° • -_ m i c m z 3 o _ Q L, _a Dicke e axe1 0 1 Yi- O Kelley Pkwy .Sugg a+�yyo"o 1 tri z Its �ir� kf+ Wayzata ej`"°' H+ v ake . � Inset 1 3 Y" R rdAveN - °°' Stubbs Bay For St Jenning's Bay r,a^ � J irrison . . ♦ R `'�_ • • Lafayette ,lyric AGe� - .• Bay . Inset 2 �''� .: ?, �•. _' •r : City Limits Rivers & Streams 0 3,500 Feet Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT + c ti Northern Ave Crystal PI BaY�ety A/ a( 0I/1e Batt ; j 2 �' .E Livingston Ave �I f manager Browns 0 Sho Dr \' Bay j - , -- -. ake inch Pea e .- Inset 1 Smith Bracketts 1 I Bay Point 1 rk. (1 unit acres) i i Residential / ♦ � Mixed Use (10 - • ,Ain `r�nl%- unit / 2 acres) 1 Urban High Island Density 1 1 Residential (20 Urban Low Wm ' 1 3� =• Highland Avo Density Commercial / ik ._, ?—Rutledge Road . �,- Azure Road+ Residential (0.5 � • it" i - 2 units / acre) park q�e � • �`SrmS r� � ry j. •• Density Park, Residential (3 - 10 units/ acre) Recreational, + c ti Northern Ave Crystal PI BaY�ety A/ a( 0I/1e Batt ; j 2 �' .E Livingston Ave �I i C Lyric Ave m _ 0 Sho Dr \' p cf 6 • Q � +1��4 �`rl / to Pea e .- Inset 1 Land Use Classes Rural Preserve / 5 Urban Medium High Density (1 unit acres) i Residential / Rural Mixed Use (10 - Residential (1 20 units /acre) unit / 2 acres) Urban High Island Density Residential Residential (20 Urban Low - 25 units / acre) 3� =• Highland Avo Density Commercial / ?—Rutledge Road . �,- Azure Road+ Residential (0.5 Office elAve - 2 units / acre) park q�e Urban Medium Industrial Density Park, Residential (3 - 10 units/ acre) Recreational, and Open Space W ' m" ° c r o Jd o o Map 313-3a Crown Dr 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN I I4e• 1 � i L.._.._.._.._.._.._.._ Togo Road Ln i L U Legend Road j - Northern WarWar�Ve WArm Dr •�''"•� �n9 St ? Shoreline Dr �?; Del Otero Ave: o 1 i Spring 1 Park 1 Bayl 1 r.. _ _'.r; City Limits Lakes & Ponds Wetlands Rivers & Streams 0 1,000 Feet Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT t% .c a Future Land Use -Navarre � & E BOLTON K November 2018 Real People. Real Solutions. .• F �o 1 N°`�hV1eW� Westwood Road y�°°ate`` Arcola � �n o0 Ln ay �� w o `old County Roan, / d Cry4at � v , d Crystal PI Livingston Ave ia L a faye., tte LyricAve I Shoreline Dr 1 .._.._._..._.._.._.._.._ Bay 0 &I m ' ca •♦ I 'y9 ) LP -a Land Use Classes Rural Preserve 'A� • �' (1 unit / 5 acres) a � Rural arman s Residential 1 unit / 2 acres ad �� �' Island ay �•• Residential �•• Urban Low �►�• Density ♦` Residential (0.5 �•� - 2 units / acre) 'e Urban Medium Density •i`• Residential (3 - •�` 10 units/ acre) • Casco <q St Q, Urban Medium High Density Residential / Mixed Use (10 - 20 units / acre) Urban High Density Residential (20 - 25 units / acre) Map 313-3b Point Commercial / Office Industrial Park, Recreational, and Open Space Map 313-3b Point 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN 1 - i 1 i .� .. 1 � • ee Tog iRoa .._.._.._..—.._..� s Legend W Arm Road *1- Warren Ave U Ln Northern W Arm Dr Ln8 St . Shoreline Dr '? Del Otero Ave" I 1 1 Spnng: Park Bayl 1 City Limits Lakes & Ponds Wetlands Rivers & Streams 0 1,000 Feet Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT Future Land Use - Navarre M BOLTON November 2018 i & M E N K Real People. Real Solutions. 1 iL---Z/ � NoVhview Road i Westwood Road `fit i 81°ows Ln o a a' gay AOld County Rod, Cry4at ed d + Ln Lafayette je Dr 1 /"'a 0 m � / 0 �• :51 a ".� : _ Land Use Classes -; m. �' �\ 1 ? Rural Preserve Urban Medium (1 unit / 5 acres) High Density ; s % .� i Residential / i Mixed Use (10 - • Rural 20 units / acre) Carman s Residential (1 _LJ�• '' unit / 2 acres) Urban High Ba♦' dd Island � Density y Residential Residential (20 ♦•' - 25 units / acre) <n eke.. Po afay ay St ♦�• v Urban Low 0 •♦�� .c E a° ♦• c Residential (0.5 Office rl• ♦•� ,G �0 �— •♦• 3 Urban Medium Industrial 0 Density ♦�• Urban Low •♦�� Density Commercial / ♦• Residential (0.5 Office rl• ♦•� - 2 units / acre) �— •♦• Urban Medium Industrial 0 Density Park, 1\'^��_= ♦••♦ Residential (3 - r♦'' 10 units/ acre) Recreational, 1 and Open - ♦ Space Casco Map 3B -3b Point 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN MI Q °°12 L � Q � rL j • \ Turner Road 'a,. sta „ �� •„ , Z-1 i I Z 0 x 'p i s Dickea°, T T Drake Dr moa e N � 1 0 ° v Spring, o v ne Lake K Lydiard Pve N Classen Long Lake c IY 'FI2 Daniels St 1 J r•1 . o F-° _ e� o �o Moline Road 0 CL1 df 1)R m a O Planned Development Sites BOLTON November 2018 & M E N K Real People. Real Solutions. 1 \ 19N °av ti • `ate. Hca 9 Labe Wayzata Blvtl Ave 26 sae • •— W r E g -j �O rn d 12 park "sr HI P'hl " �2F da 9c l 1 Cy 1 Rice St E waY2ata Blvd E Stubbs o Lake Bay Painterjkoad rn_ Fox St p`6 ` - ° r 00 Lc — • i0 �° W Branch Road Countv Road 151 1 c North Browns 1`'" Pe het° aayzata it, .l� Tanager Bay y v Arm Maxwell Lake # �Q Bay French 1 Sunnyfield Road E �. Forest Marsh -3 Lake t�,Shore Z Dr 1 C' Denning'° 1 2 1 Bay , m 0 1 Smiti Game Farm Road E 0 ' • % Poin tts 1 w • ` Point c Wes+ �• Dutch v Crystal Bohns • �. 1 Lake > Bay Point, • . in .f Harrison .. •, • • ` • ; r Bay 1 �; 1 i Development Areas E s 1 Lyriwood Blvd E ` — • • — • • — • . — : R 1 A - Orchard yoL -�` =.V Shoreline or Northern Ave 1 3 j Lafayette a B -Kelley Pkwy. /Wayzata Blvd. 1IF ' • — • • — • • — ••` Bay .� /L High Density / Mixed Use Sites Legend e 'y •,�' ,� Par �.•�• C -Fire Station Cit Limits Lakes & Ponds - Sprinr 1 ! .' y pr, Carman's •i D - 2 Acre Sewered Lots B Bay 2040 MUSA Rivers & Streams o '•,�•• . `•,;�• E -Navarre 0 3,500 .e ✓ Feet " Casco • • Point 1 Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT • �'' — " — " — IPI Map 313-4 Ave N Z c J cc 0 L L � Q � rL j Moot �� <e •1 Z-1 i I Z x 'p i s Dickea°, moa e N � 1 Lake 3 Spring, o°`o Lydiard Long Lake c IY 'FI2 Daniels St 1 J r•1 . 1 \ 19N °av ti • `ate. Hca 9 Labe Wayzata Blvtl Ave 26 sae • •— W r E g -j �O rn d 12 park "sr HI P'hl " �2F da 9c l 1 Cy 1 Rice St E waY2ata Blvd E Stubbs o Lake Bay Painterjkoad rn_ Fox St p`6 ` - ° r 00 Lc — • i0 �° W Branch Road Countv Road 151 1 c North Browns 1`'" Pe het° aayzata it, .l� Tanager Bay y v Arm Maxwell Lake # �Q Bay French 1 Sunnyfield Road E �. Forest Marsh -3 Lake t�,Shore Z Dr 1 C' Denning'° 1 2 1 Bay , m 0 1 Smiti Game Farm Road E 0 ' • % Poin tts 1 w • ` Point c Wes+ �• Dutch v Crystal Bohns • �. 1 Lake > Bay Point, • . in .f Harrison .. •, • • ` • ; r Bay 1 �; 1 i Development Areas E s 1 Lyriwood Blvd E ` — • • — • • — • . — : R 1 A - Orchard yoL -�` =.V Shoreline or Northern Ave 1 3 j Lafayette a B -Kelley Pkwy. /Wayzata Blvd. 1IF ' • — • • — • • — ••` Bay .� /L High Density / Mixed Use Sites Legend e 'y •,�' ,� Par �.•�• C -Fire Station Cit Limits Lakes & Ponds - Sprinr 1 ! .' y pr, Carman's •i D - 2 Acre Sewered Lots B Bay 2040 MUSA Rivers & Streams o '•,�•• . `•,;�• E -Navarre 0 3,500 .e ✓ Feet " Casco • • Point 1 Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT • �'' — " — " — IPI Map 313-4 Ave N Z c J cc 0 L 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN M 00 Turner Road R 0 Drake Dr r 0 r � R Moline Road 0 - ya r 19N Planned Development Sites BOLTON November 2018 & M E N K Real People. Real Solutions. �MNVAIStubbs 'WINE "11 RAW Branch Road County Road 1511 ajote IM 0 N -PS ,,_ •I�l� L4Z 30 E-111141111111 66-0 Jenning Bay Ga me Farm Ro-ad E tI 215 rte 11► ���� �/ 1 �3 r f/� �1'��i �� `�\�p�lll//�� �' ���11f,����` /11► = °��i :�� �tl �i �i�i `J 1 /� 1�=t� /��IIr� � -� = �n�w�p� .,SJ nom/• West 4V== ■- 15 Lake Bay Point. - t Harrison e�► *Bay_ !/Nortiii/iiirM111, `% lli ♦�, �•...JL Sprinr 1 City Limits Lakes & Ponds - ! =„i • p,� Carman's Bay ,. 2040 MUSA Rivers & Streams 0 3,500 e Feet n, Casco • Point 1 Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT • �'' — ” — •' — oh9 Lak, Wayzata Blvd W . • Ave Rioegrksw � St F ayzata Blvd E Lake St F m ,o as Browns 1 pea oto Nayzata Tanage Bay Bay 1 ake 1 1 1 Smith Bracketts 1 Point Z C J Ave N 1 i Development Areas i A - Orchard 1 a o j B - Kelley Pkwy. / Wayzata Blvd. High Density / Mixed Use Sites .4e Par 4� C - Fire Station 0 D - 2 Acre Sewered Lots E - Navarre 9 1k, Map 313-4 • •1 _ r IN - ` ■ ��� � . � ��� �� 111►� a,�IL ,,.; \\�M� - � �� �.LIf►� , 12— oe,IN�;: .mr �MNVAIStubbs 'WINE "11 RAW Branch Road County Road 1511 ajote IM 0 N -PS ,,_ •I�l� L4Z 30 E-111141111111 66-0 Jenning Bay Ga me Farm Ro-ad E tI 215 rte 11► ���� �/ 1 �3 r f/� �1'��i �� `�\�p�lll//�� �' ���11f,����` /11► = °��i :�� �tl �i �i�i `J 1 /� 1�=t� /��IIr� � -� = �n�w�p� .,SJ nom/• West 4V== ■- 15 Lake Bay Point. - t Harrison e�► *Bay_ !/Nortiii/iiirM111, `% lli ♦�, �•...JL Sprinr 1 City Limits Lakes & Ponds - ! =„i • p,� Carman's Bay ,. 2040 MUSA Rivers & Streams 0 3,500 e Feet n, Casco • Point 1 Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT • �'' — ” — •' — oh9 Lak, Wayzata Blvd W . • Ave Rioegrksw � St F ayzata Blvd E Lake St F m ,o as Browns 1 pea oto Nayzata Tanage Bay Bay 1 ake 1 1 1 Smith Bracketts 1 Point Z C J Ave N 1 i Development Areas i A - Orchard 1 a o j B - Kelley Pkwy. / Wayzata Blvd. High Density / Mixed Use Sites .4e Par 4� C - Fire Station 0 D - 2 Acre Sewered Lots E - Navarre 9 1k, Map 313-4 CMP Part 3C. Housing Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS CMP PART 3C HOUSING PLAN Page Introduction.................................................................................. 3C-2 Figure 3C-1 Community Designation 3C-3 Basic Housing Concepts and Principles..................................................... 3C-4 Table 3C-1: Population and Households 1970-2040 3C-6 Summary of Existing Housing Statistics.................................................... 3C-7 Table 3C-2: Dwelling Units by Type (2005-2016) 3C-7 Table 3C-3: Owner/Renter Statistics (2000-2015) 3C-8 Table 3C-4: Age of Existing Housing Stock 3C-8 Table 3C-5: Housing Demolitions 3C-9 Table 3C-6: Valuation of Owner -Occupied Units 3C-9 Figure 3C-2 Owner Occupied Housing by Est. Mkt Value 3C-10 Table 3C-7: Housing Cost Burden Households 3C-11 Housing Needs Identification..................................................................... 3C-11 Table 3C-8: Orono Housing Goals 3C-12 Housing Implementation Plan 3C-12 Housing Action Plan................................................................................. 3C-14 City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3C, Page 1 CMP Part 3C. Housing Plan CMP PART 3C HOUSING PLAN INTRODUCTION An increasing priority of national, regional and local concern is for the provision of an adequate supply of safe, affordable housing for all citizens. Land costs and other development factors suggest that these affordable and lifecycle housing needs can most practically be addressed within the urban areas of Orono. A secondary concern is that much of Orono's existing affordable housing is aging, and there is an increasing need for neighborhood preservation and housing rehabilitation. The Metropolitan Land Planning Act requires that local comprehensive plans include "official controls and land use planning to promote the availability of land for the development of low and moderate income housing" (Minn. Stat. Sec. 473.859, Subd. 2). To further address housing needs, the Minnesota Legislature in 1995 enacted the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act (LCA)}, establishing a fund for communities to invest in local economic revitalization and affordable housing initiatives. The Act provided for funding in three specific areas: cleaning up polluted land; revitalizing communities and promoting efficient development; and providing housing affordable to people with moderate incomes. As the Metropolitan Area continues to grow, the provision of adequate housing poses ongoing challenges for local and regional governments. The three primary facets of the problem include: 1. Supply - Inadequate supply of lower-cost housing in good condition; 2. Location - Concentration of low and moderate income housing in the core cities and inner suburbs; and 3. Affordability - A widening gap between the price of housing and income. 2040 REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK Accommodating future growth of the Metro Area is a concern that will require wide-ranging resources. The Metropolitan Council in 2014 adopted its "Thrive MSP 2040" to provide a plan for addressing the challenges that will be faced by the Twin Cities area over the next two decades in accommodating expected growth in the region. In addressing the challenges of growth, Metropolitan Council has acknowledged that a "one size fits all" approach to implementing the Regional Development Framework is not appropriate, and has designated Geographic Planning Areas to identify communities with similar types of growth. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3C, Page 2 CMP Part 3C. Housing Plan Community Designations City of Orono, Hennepin County Plain Indepwndemee MImst Idlli Bound '- $baMWhC� Wadlna Orono W4XWlind Community dasly.nablons Orad® Caunal plannng *L&wO_ EITI&TIn{p SUNUP GOEOM ® AWWAAM SuaurbdA Edge Fal RaWWOol SwuiDen Dkgwn6ed RWw Ljroen Rural Ginter Urban C: ber ® Gmnav 6nvMerse t...j Uto arid U"Fil Intl Figure 3C-1: Community Designations City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3C, Page 3 Beach ) odoph2vbn l Minnetonka Tankf i `'•" J Eacrlaiof Ch�nhpeFprra Edpn Name Community dasly.nablons Orad® Caunal plannng *L&wO_ EITI&TIn{p SUNUP GOEOM ® AWWAAM SuaurbdA Edge Fal RaWWOol SwuiDen Dkgwn6ed RWw Ljroen Rural Ginter Urban C: ber ® Gmnav 6nvMerse t...j Uto arid U"Fil Intl Figure 3C-1: Community Designations City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3C, Page 3 CMP Part 3C. Housing Plan Community Designation Orono has been classified as a mix between Rural Residential; and Emerging Suburban Edge. Within the "Rural Residential", Metropolitan Council's role includes tl-w—encouraging rural development patterns that will protect natural resources and preserve areas where post 2040 growth can be provided with cost-effective and efficient urban infrastructure, and work with communities to plan development patterns that will protect natural resources and water quality and quantity, and maintain existing contiguous lots that are 10 or more acres in size. The local community's role is to: 1. Discourage future development of rural residential patterns (unsewered lots of 2.5 acres or less) and where opportunities exist, plan for rural development at densities that are not greater than 1 unit per 10 acres. 2. Implement conservation subdivision ordinances, cluster development ordinances, and environmental protection provisions in local land use ordinances, consistent with the Council's flexible residential development guidelines. 3. Promote best management practices for stormwater management, habitat restoration, and natural resource conservation in development plans and projects. The Metropolitan Council has established Orono's growth forecasts for the Planning term. Orono's populations is anticipated to increase to 9,500 persons by 2040, an increase of 1,800 persons from 2016 levels. See also Table 3C-1 in this Chapter. 575 new households. As an Emerging Suburban Edge, local government's role is 1. Plan and stage development for forecasted growth through 2040 and beyond at overall average net densities of at least 3-5 dwelling units per acre in the community. Target higher -intensity developments in areas with better access to regional sewer and transportation infrastructure, connections to local commercial activity centers, transit facilities, and recreational amenities. 2. Identify and protect an adequate supply of land to support growth for future development beyond 2040, with regard to agricultural viability and natural and historic resources preservation. 3. Incorporate best management practices for stormwater management and natural resources conservation and restoration in planning processes. 4. Plan for local infrastructure needs including those needed to support future growth. BASIC HOUSING CONCEPTS AND PRINCIPLES This Housing Plan is an indication of the ongoing policies and concerns of Orono residents toward addressing our own housing goals while taking considered and appropriate measures to address regional housing concerns. This Plan is a refinement and restatement of the planning direction established in the 1974 Orono Village Comprehensive Guide Plan, and updated in 1980, 2000, and 2008. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3C, Page 4 CMP Part 3C. Housing Plan The Housing Plan is an integral part of Orono's Community Management Plan. The policy decisions relating to Orono's housing improvement programs complement and balance regional plans with local concerns for historic development patterns, environmental protection, public health, fiscal responsibility and general land use. Orono's urban and rural areas provide distinctly different lifestyles, amenities and services which jointly characterize the community as a whole. Each area has separate planning priorities and separate environmental considerations. Urban areas and urban services will not be permitted to encroach on or destroy the rural area of the city. Orono has acknowledged the need for a wider range of housing alternative and has taken steps to provide new locations for development of urban density housing where it will not be in conflict with the rural area. Many of these areas have been guided or rezoned to allow for appropriate urban housing densities and have become a part of Orono's urban area. Orono's land use plan calls for development in both the urban and the rural portions of the City. The urban area will see new residential development on the existing vacant lots and undeveloped parcels similar to the forms of development typical of the closer -in suburbs. Opportunities exist for substantial rehabilitation projects in the older urban neighborhoods and for scattered -site new construction of affordable and lifecycle housing units. Overall urban density will not increase dramatically because of the ecological considerations of proximity to Lake Minnetonka. The rural area will see continued residential development at a steady pace. Strict subdivision review will ensure adequate retention of privately owned and maintained open space, wetland conservation, and on- site sewage treatment system site evaluation. The typical rural lot will continue to provide for a rural lifestyle as the low investment in public services continues to make the land competitive with more fully developed suburban properties. Orono's land use plans and programs allow new urban and rural developments to provide comparable cost housing opportunities. The projected population numbers for 2020 through 2040 shown in Table 3C-1 reflect the gradually decreasing size of the typical household, reduced from 3.16 persons per household (PPH) in 1970 to 2.63-59 PPH at the 2010 census. Household sizes are projected to shrink even further to a level of 2.4739 PPH by 2030. Orono's 2030 population projection of 89,800 reflects an estimated 40 3,560 households at 2.4739 persons per household. In Orono, the Land Use Plan is the determinant factor in future growth, rather than allowing growth to drive the Land Use Plan. This is the cornerstone of Orono's long-term development philosophy and policies. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3C, Page 5 CMP Part 3C. Housing Plan L Table 3C-1: Orono Population and Households 1970 - 2040 (Sewered and Unsewered Forecasts) Population Year 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2016 2020 2030 2040 Sewered -- -- -- -- 4,429 -- 5,150 6,170 6,740 Unsewered -- -- -- -- 3,008 -- 2,950 2,630 2,760 Total City 6,787 6,845 7,285 7,538 7,437 7,691 8,100 8,800 9,500 Household Year 1970 1980 1990 2000g2,826 2016 2020L3,560 2040 Sewered -- -- -- -- -- 2,1052,785 Unsewered -- -- -- -- -- 1,0951,115 Total City 2,146 2,291 2,613 2,7663,037 3,200 3,900 Persons/HH 3.16 2.99 2.79 2.732.53 2.53 2.44 Source: Metropolitan Council System Statement Orono's land use plan accommodates all planned population growth in a variety of housing opportunities. The forecast population increase of approximately 2,000 persons in the next twenty years translates into a housing demand of approximately 800 new dwelling units. This average of 40 new dwellings per year is consistent with Orono's rate of building permit issuance during the past two decades. Based on the Land Use Plan, approximately two-thirds of these new units are expected to develop in the urban area. Successful development of a wide range of housing alternatives is directly related to the ability to obtain the necessary infrastructure and public services. In today's market-,--aAffordable housing and many forms of lifecycle housing are most appropriate only k asfl9L at urban densities where services, emplovment. and transportation are available. without the need for an automobile. In Orono. with urban whie ,,,.i,,,,, infrastructure such as municipal sewer and water, and the wide range of urban services not available to in the 80% of Orono that -is -planned for low-density rural residential development., affordable housing may not be practical. New housing alternatives in Orono are anticipated to occur within the existing urban area as well as in specified urban area expansions that are detailed in the Land Use Plan. These housing options will include a range of housing styles and types at densities of 2 to 250 units per acre. Where feasible, affordable housing units will be incorporated within High Density Residential in the Land Use Plan. These designated areas are depicted in the Land Use Plan chapter of *"�Dthis Plan. Development Density and Housing Goals Minnesota Statutes 473.859 Subd. 2(c) states that the content of the land use plan element of comprehensive plans shall "include a housing element containing standards, plans and programs for providing adequate housing opportunities to meet existing and projected local and regional housing needs, including but not limited to the use of official controls and land use planning to promote the availability of land for the development of low and moderate income housing." City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3C, Page 6 CMP Part 3C. Housing Plan 2021-2030 Housing Fealsallocation. For the period 2021-2030, Met Council established an geal allocation of 154 affordable units for the City of Orono. See also Table 3C-7. !�e�ee!reazs�eee:�ef��.. er�i�rrr3cse���serseer: 2005 SUMMARY OF EXISTING HOUSING CONDITIONS The following sections provide a brief summary of the housing types, occupancy tenure, structural condition and price range of housing in Orono. Housing Types The predominant housing type in Orono is single-family detached dwellings. This is true of both the urban and the rural areas of the City. However, the number of multi -family housing units has increased substantially since 2000, primarily along the Highway 12 corridor with the addition of the Orono Woods Senior Housing building and the Stonebay development. This feeeli* iner-ease it multi f�mily development is a dir-eet resttit of implementation of the 2000 2020 Land Use P that guided a seleet gr-ettp of pafeels in ner-them Or -one fef higher- r-esidenfial densities. Table 3C-2 Dwelling Units by Type (2005-2016) 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Single Family (One unit detached) 2942 2953 2954 2944 2960 2952 2962 2944 2956 3019 2988 3006 Townhome 88 94 101 102 108 74 98 74 74 74 80 96 Duplex, Tri, Quad 19 19 19 19 19 30 60 30 30 30 30 30 Apartment (5 or more units) 62 110 119 119 119 153 76 206 215 215 215 215 Mobile Home/Trailer 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 13 13 0 0 0 Total Dwelling Units 3111 3176 3193 3184 3206 3209 3209 3267 3288 3338 3313 3348 Source: US census A review of the Owner/ Rental statistics shows that the number of rental housing units is rising quickly, from 5 percent in 2000 to over 15 percent in 2015. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3C, Page 7 CMP Part 3C. Housing Plan Table 3C-3: Owner/Renter Statistics (2000-2015) 2000 2015 Occupancy Type Number of % of All Units Number of % of All 150 Units 345 Units Units Owner -occupied 2,604 89.60% 2,808 84.76% Renter -occupied 162 5.60% 505 15.24% Total Occupied Units 2,766 426 3,313 1960-69 Source: 2010 census, Metropolitan Council Age of Existing Housing Stock The range in ages of Orono's existing housing stock by defining the decade of construction is indicated in Table 3C-4. Approximately 56% of the housing stock is more than 50 years old, which raises concern about its continued functionality if maintenance is deferred. The numbers in Table 3C-4 do not necessarily reflect the extensive remodeling and upgrading that many Orono residences, especially lakeshore homes, have undergone in the last three decades. Table 3C-4: Age of Existing Housing Stock (2000 and 2016) Year Built 2000 % 2017 % unknown 150 5% 345 10% Pre -1940 693 24% 663 20% 1940-49 172 6% 150 4% 1950-59 343 12% 426 13% 1960-69 298 10% 304 9% 1970-79 415 15% 366 11% 1980-89 412 14% 447 13% 1990-00 359 13% 367 11% 2000-09 420 13% 2010-17 203 6% Total 2,845 100% 3,346 100% Source: 2000 U.S. Census; Hennepin County Records City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3C, Page 8 CMP Part 3C. Housing Plan Housing Demolitions Table 3C-5 reports the demolition of residential principal structures over the last 7 years. An average of 20 homes are removed per year. With land values continuously increasing and a substantial supply of older lakeshore homes still remaining in Orono, this trend is expected to continue. The City will monitor this trend to guard against the erosion of neighborhood character. Table 3C-5: Housing Demolitions Year # of Principal Structure Demolitions 2010 10 2011 15 2012 13 2013 25 2014 20 2015 27 2016 19 2017 33 Source: City Permitting records Cost Valuation of Housing in Orono Owner -occupied Housing The valuation of housing units in Orono is strongly tied to the location in relation to the lakeshore, though to some extent the age of the housing impacts the value. Much of the housing in Orono has been constructed as 'custom' housing rather than tract housing. Hennepin County Records were used to create the following table of housing values in Orono in 2015, illustrated as a percentage of total housing. Of note, almost 75%3s of all owner occupied housing is valued at $300,000 or more. Figure 3C-2 graphically illustrates the location of owner occupied housing and indicates value of the home. Table 3C-6: Valuation of Owner -occupied Units 2015 Valuation 2015 $75,000 to $99,999 0.43% $100,000 to $124,999 0.93% $125,000 to $149,999 2.76% $150,000 to $174,999 3.39% $175,000 to $199,999 3.23% $200,000 to $249,999 8.10% $250,000 to $299,999 7.52% $300,000 to $399,999 10.51% $400,000 to $499,999 9.93% $500,000 or more 53.15% Source: Hennepin County City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3C, Page 9 CMP Part 3C. Housing Plan Owner -Occupied Housing by Estimated Market Value Orono a a +aa.E as f .■ a + a■a • * i a a a a• Ma pie !r* ■ M* a • a` ■'■ ai ai• ■fli t Plain * a. ■Medina � ■■ #■ * a t! � N. a ■ I_ —--'�.,>..---- ` .,�—--_..._. a• t.rwa.- ■;a w a a #■ ■■ �■■ Ai.i•-■� PItm io`u'cteh,t ■ • a r ■ r ++ i Independence*` i ■■ a s+i i _ ■ i +► � ira a .1r t L a# ong i a aw i • ■a #a '0a■ i *r * ; e; s' �a� Lake�■ aa ,� w■ ". �" * +job ■ �a+a`a•*a■ab'bi+--r,.ji'%.-+a+ *i*� •>fi No an a 600 am* rr t r ■� aa_no,`i ■ ■ . W* *•a Orr* S , ■ ■ ♦ _ r F ti fa Min netelsta*` '.:: ■ �: ar 40 Ya r. a= tea+ r■ I 41 ' I r• 'yltoi�dlartits I " .. Park 3116, ., ■ � t a 1M r Mound . + r + -P To�rnk 11 a awrRSL-"aaY ,��,, + r* �. h`oreood a � � ;S t w . to EA14 i. • 0 CDUrl,y BUJI111309S = Cq and Township Bmndanes Lakes and Major Rlweis — StreeCenlErIfleE Owner -Occupied Housing) (Estimated Market Value, 2615 $2M,SDO IX LEbs $2M,S1l1 ba 53ia,L'{ D �3a41.aa1 to S460,ND vrer yasa,Wa ■ a kdin-net onka - G: n W-00 1Imb-13.971 Tlles 4 - Sone vont. i'Je44Gi8 Regraim+Parcei 0ansr[, SD1I5 estinatatl rnMd w ue rar taxes payahe In _015. NIAe: Esllmated Uadu! 'Valuer s�tles nnN homes<.eair] u-i� 'th a b%Akl na an the parcel. Figure 3C-2: Owner Occupied Housing by Estimated Market Value City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3C, Page 10 CMP Part 3C. Housing Plan Affordable housing Table 3C-7 shows the current (2016) number of households with incomes 80% of the AMI, or less. These 639 households represent 21% of the total households in Orono. Aeeer-d ng to the MetTepalitan Couneil, there are 345 households within Or-ene tha4 afe at or- below 0 Median ineome (AM!). 345 households represents appr-exima4ely 0 of the 1+Uffiber—of households obsefved diffing the 2010 Census. We consider this the supply of housing units that are affordahle_ Table 3C-7: Affordable Housing -2( Currently 016) Projected need 2021- 2030 Income at or below 30% of AMT 78 69 Income 31-50% of AMI 76 56 Income 51-80% of AMI 485 Zq Totals 639 1 154 Table 3C 7! Housing Households Cost Bur -den Households r,,,.ome at ,.,. bolew 300% „a n N41 4-67 TneE)+Re 3 1 5 0,0 1 „c AA4-1 IN r.,,...„,0 41 40,01 ,.c A -M-1 7S Source: Metropolitan Council Table 3C-7 also illustrates Orono's share of additional affordable homes for the 2021-2030 decade. Orono intends to provide opportunity for these units in the form of 15.4 acres of development at densities higher than 10 units per acre. Table 313-4 predicts all developable properties within the sewered area. 63.4 acres are identified for development at densities ,greater than 10 units per acre. Table 3C-8 shows the number of costs burdened households. households whose housing costs are at least 30% of their income. We consider this the demand of affordable housing. The demand of affordable housing, at 30% or less of the AMI is almost double the supply. Based on these calculations and estimates, the greatest need of housing is for incomes at or below 30% of the Table 3C-8 : Cost Burdened Households At or Below 30% AMI 148 Between 31 % and 50% AMI 64 Between 51% and 80% AMI 104 Total Units 316 Subsidized Housing Units City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3C, Page 11 CMP Part 3C. Housing Plan At the present time, the City of Orono does not contain any units of subsidized housing. This is due in part to the lack of or limited shopping and employment opportunities, public transportation, and medical facilities. HOUSING NEEDS IDENTIFICATION In assessing local housing needs, Orono has identified the need for a broader range of housing choices including starter homes, empty -nester_, and senior housing, and an ongoing need for substantial housing rehabilitation. Our aging population is retiring and on fixed incomes. Orono has identified one of our greatest needs as housing rehabilitation for senior -citizen homeowners and for alternative senior housing accommodations in the immediate lake area. A second pressing need is for a wider range of housing options for middle income residents, such as those who grew up in Orono and would like to raise a family here, but cannot find suitably priced homes. A third identified need is for the empty nesters or professionals whose lifestyle better matches the amenities of attached unit housing. The Land Use Plan (Chapter 3B, and Maps 3B -3a) identifies development opportunities in a variety of densities to meet the diverse housing demands of the City of Orono. Ofene's housing needs were identified in part thr-ough the LNIACC Sub Regional Housing Study Metropolitan Livable Communities Program In 1995 the Minnesota legislature enacted the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act, which established funding for metro -area cities to invest in local economic revitalization and affordable housing initiatives. The Metropolitan Council is responsible for implementing the Metropolitan Livable Communities Program, and negotiating with individual municipalities to establish affordable and life -cycle housing goals consistent with the Metropolitan Development Guide .. .. ... . ... . ... .. . . ... . . .. .. . .. .. . .. 11.0 �..41111 .. M City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3C, Page 12 CMP Part 3C. Housing Plan .LEMMA,, Total New Housing starts - 1030 24-7 - 104 A - 340 HOUSING IMPEMENTA TION PLAN Orono's Housing Implementation Plan is based upon the following Goals and Policies which are designed to be consistent with our regional housing responsibilities and with the Goals, Policies and Plans of the other elements of the Community Management Plan. SCOPE The time framework of the housing improvement plan is intended to address the requirements of the Metropolitan Council for the planning period of 2020 through 2040 and retain Orono's own housing character. The goals, policies and proposed housing programs contained in this Chapter are set in the context of the legislative mandate to plan for regional needs through the year 2040. In addition, the housing programs also reflect Orono's plans for permanent maintenance of the low density rural residential community. , and pfegfams for- addfessing the diff�feiit needs of both the urban and rur-al areas of Or -one. Housing Goals 1. To provide housing types and residential densities consistent with environmental and land use plans and with the availability of public services and facilities. 2. To provide opportunities for a mix of housing types, locations, and cost ranges which will meet the needs and provide adequate housing for a broader range of ages, family groups, lifestyle needs and levels of income to the greatest extent practical. 3. To improve the housing conditions of persons residing in substandard housing. 4. To provide safe, healthful, and blight -free residences and neighborhoods. 5. To provide immediately beneficial housing programs for the greatest number of Orono residents with affordable housing needs. Urban Housing Policies 1. The residential areas of urban Orono are primarily suitable for single family development. Because of historic development patterns, most of Orono's urbanized neighborhoods are located along the Lake Minnetonka shoreline, or within 1,000 feet of the shoreline. These lands are environmentally sensitive to overuse or over development such as typically occurs with large scale developments. Urban residential development in a limited number of areas further from the shoreline at a density of 2-250 units per acre is compatible with Orono's environmental policies of limited hardcover and maximum retention of natural City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3C, Page 13 CMP Part 3C. Housing Plan open space and vegetation to protect Lake Minnetonka. 2. A wider range of housing types will be provided by planned residential developments. A limited amount of land is available within the Urban Service Area for planned developments of townhomes, garden type apartments or mixed residential and limited commercial land uses. These housing clusters or multiple family developments will be acceptable only where full urban services are available and only where the proposed density is compatible with the neighborhood and with local environmental constraints. Multiple family developments generally will not be considered appropriate for lands within 1,000 feet of Lake Minnetonka. Additionally, County Road 15 is the key roadway serving Orono's urban areas and particularly the Navarre area. It is not practical from an economic or environmental standpoint to expand County Road 15 to increase its capacity. Therefore, additional housing options will be primarily developed along Orono's Highway 12 corridor in specifically identified areas that are or will be served by urban services. The City will consider proposals for developments that will provide housing types in furtherance of Orono's housing goals as established in this Housing Plan, gttided f stteh use but whieh may be . me f s e , 3. Urban density residential development must occur within the defined Urban Area. Orono's Community Management Plan is not a staged growth plan. The Urban Area as defined in this Plan will not be greatly expanded into the defined rural area, and urban services and facilities will not be extended into the rural area for purposes of fostering or allowing increased development in those areas. 4. Urban density residential development will utilize existing or planned public services and facilities. New residential development will be allowed to infill existing vacant properties within the Urban Area consistent with environmental limitations and with the existing or planned capacities of water, sewer, drainage, transportation and recreational facilities. New development will not be permitted to overburden these services at the expense of the existing users. New urban development will not be permitted if it requires additional unplanned local or regional facilities capacity. 5. The City will promote scattered site development as opposed to large scale tract development within the existing developed urban area. 6. The City will promote rehabilitation of existing older or substandard homes. Whereas there is no identifiable block of deteriorated housing in the City, there are a substantial number of older homes or converted cottages that are in need of repair, energy conservation measures, or major rehabilitation. In many cases, these homes are occupied by low income or fixed income persons who cannot undertake the needed work within their means. Maintaining existing neighborhoods and existing homes enables maintenance of affordability. Replacement of these homes, even with higher density development, would result in substantially increased housing prices. The City will promote private and subsidized public rehabilitation efforts to City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3C, Page 14 CMP Part 3C. Housing Plan improve the existing housing stock, to improve and maintain the neighborhoods, and most importantly to improve the living conditions of the affected citizens. 7. The City will promote development or rehabilitation that is compatible with the existing neighborhood. The City will encourage all homeowners and developers to be conscious of the neighborhood, the site and the environment in the design and improvement of residential properties. The City will encourage, and in many cases, require the retention of woods and vegetation, open spaces, light, air and scenic views. No new development will be permitted to conflict with or to adversely affect the established neighborhood character. Rural Housing Policies L Housing in rural Orono will be limited to single family homes at established rural densities. The majority of the rural area has been zoned to require a minimum of 2 acres of dry buildable land per residential lot, with an area in the northwest corner of the City requiring at least 5 dry buildable acres. 2 The City will promote rehabilitation of existing older or substandard rural homes. Rural Orono contains a significant number of older homes, which also require repair, energy conservation measures or major rehabilitation. These rural owners also require the same type of assistance often reserved for urban areas. Therefore, the City will promote private and subsidized public rehabilitation efforts in both urban and rural housing improvements programs. HOUSING ACTION PLAN Orono's Housing Action Plan is a set of implementation policies designed to achieve the above stated Housing Goals and Planning Policies. A top priority in Orono must be improving the housing conditions of persons who are presently inadequately housed and eliminating substandard housing. There are deteriorated and dilapidated housing units located throughout the City. Orono's Housing Action Plan is aimed principally at improving the condition of Orono's older homes, both urban and rural, and improving the housing conditions of Orono's many low, moderate and fixed income residents. 1 Orono will cooperate with neighboring cities to fulfill area -wide housing needs. Most apparent is the need of many senior Orono residents who desire to live in the immediate area, but who cannot find available senior housing. Orono will actively participate with nearby municipalities to facilitate the provision of senior housing at locations that are near to home yet also convenient to necessary shopping, transportation and medical facilities. 2 Orono will continue to participate in housing rehabilitation subsidy programs. Many Orono residents, both urban and rural, are occupying older housing that has code -related structural, safety or health hazards, substandard living conditions or energy inefficiencies. They would like to improve their housing condition and their neighborhood's appearance, but are unable to because of insufficient income. Orono will continue to actively participate in Community Development Block Grant and Minnesota Housing Finance Assistance programs designed to help these citizens meet their very City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3C, Page 15 CMP Part 3C. Housing Plan immediate housing needs. 3. Orono will encourage developers to provide a variety of housing types and cost ranges. Whenever a multiple family or clustered housing development is proposed, Orono will actively encourage setting aside a reasonable number of units for large families and/or for low and moderate income families. Orono will participate and assist developers in applications for loan guarantees or other suitable forms of housing subsidy aids which may be available. Orono will also consider proposals for lifecycle housing options for sites which have not been guided for such use, but where such use may be appropriate if developed in a manner that is sensitive to the surrounding land uses and has the necessary services available. Such areas may include property that is currently guided or zoned for more intense uses such as commercial or industrial, or may include sites adjacent to existing higher intensity uses. 4, Housing construction will be subject to uniform state building code requirements but will not be burdened with unnecessary zoning requirements. Orono does not intend to require arbitrary minimum dwelling sizes or minimum amenity installations as these artificial standards only drive up the cost of housing while limiting the buyer's freedom of choice. 5. Orono will promote energy conservation methods and procedures. Orono will actively pursue and advertise all available programs for energy conservation funding. G To achieve its housing goals outlined above, the City will evaluate opportunities to utilize public and non-profit programs or to partner with other agencies in these programs. There is a wide variety of tools and programs available to cities and property owners, developed to encourage affordable housing, and include the following. The pFograms available to the City and developers to support affordable housing, depending on circumstances, include the followi - Property owners and developers should be advised that while available to the city, Orono has historically applied the use of Orono tax dollars very conservatively, only for projects that strongly met City housing, land use, environmental, and quality of life goals. ■ Orono Housing and Redevelopment Authority. The City Established an HRA in 1991. The City has used its HRA to assist in the development of Senior housing complex and may do so in the firture_ ■ Housing Bonds: Minnesota State Statute allows HRAs to issue housing bonds to provide affordable housing via the acquisition of an existing buildings, development of elderly or disability housing, or the acquisition of accumulated equity for low income preservation. . ■ Tax Abatement: Cities may issue bonds to be used to support the construction of affordable housing, using a portion of the property tax received (tax abatement) from the development to finance these bonds. This removes this property from paying taxes for the services needed for this property, its residents and the community in general. The City may develop a tax abatement policy to determine if and when the level of affordable housing and the guaranteed length of affordability provide sufficient public benefit to justify the use of tax abatement. ■ Tax Increment Financing: Cities may create a housing district to create a tax increment financing (TIF) district. The TIF bonds issued on this district are to be used to support the construction of affordable housing, and property taxes received above the original tax value (increment) from the development are utilized to finance these bonds. The property tax revenue that otherwise would be available to pay for city services would be restricted and not available to pay for the services. The City may develop a TIF policy to determine if and when the level of affordable housing and City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3C, Page 16 CMP Part 3C. Housing Plan the guaranteed length of affordability to provide a public benefit is great enough to justify the use of tax increment financing. ■ Minnesota Housing Consolidated Request for Proposals: The Minnesota Housing Finance Agency provides a request for proposal (RFP) once annually where affordable housing developers can apply for funding to construct affordable housing. The City may consider supporting applications for new housing that addresses the City's need allocation of 26744 units below 50% AMI based upon how well the proposed projects meet City objectives. ■ Community Development Block Grants (CDBG): The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) provides CDBG funds to communities with over 45,000 residents for the use of providing and maintaining affordable housing. Hennepin County HRA administers these CDBG funds for the City of OomoOrono. The City will consider applications that addresses the City's need allocation of 244-267 units below 50% AMI based upon how well the proposed projects meet City objectives. fNeighbor-hood Stabilization Program (NSP) Grants: The NSP was established by HUD for- the pur-pose of stabilizi - . ties that have suffer -ed fFom for-eelostir-es and abandonment. pr-o reAies The NS12 grants are administered by the Hennepin County INLA. ■ Energy Assistance: Xcel tel -energy and Wright -Hennepin coffer programs intended to encourage energy efficiency and responsible use of energy resources. Xcel energy promotes a bill payment assistance program. These programs and rebates rapidly change and the resident is encouraged to check with their energy provided periodically. Livable Communities Grants: Administered by the Metropolitan Council, the Livable Communities Demonstration Account (LCDA) funds innovative (re)development projects that efficiently link housing jobs, services and transit in an effort to create inspiring and lasting Livable Communities. Grants are available to fund basic public infrastructure and site assembly. fThe housing rehabilitation funding is provided through the Hennepin County ho rehabilitation pr-egr-am, whieh is funded thfough the GDBG pr-ogr-afn. The City will eon stippefting applie4ions fef new housing that addfesses the City's need alleeation of units below 50% AMI based upon how well the proposed pr-ojeets fneet City objeetives. ■ Fee Waivers or Adjustments: State rules require that city fees correlate to the cost of providing the services. The city will closely monitor expenses as they relate to project review to ensure fees closely match expenses. ■ Zoning and Subdivision Policies: The City frequently grants variances and adjusts its zoning and subdivision regulations through a planned unit development (PUD). The City currently provides zoning incentives such as increased density and potential staging plan flexibility for projects which achieve the city's housing goals. ■ 4(d) Tax Program: The 4(d) tax program provides a 40% tax credit to property owners of affordable housing de-velepers, to be leveraged with local ,government financial assistance. This program is ■ Land Trusts: A land trust achieves affordable home ownership by owning the land on which a house is located, allowing the resident to seek financing only on the house. The resident enters into a long-term lease for the home. The advantage of a land trust is that the largest contributor to housing prices in Orono is the land, and the land trust removes that cost from the purchasing equation. Tthe trust can control the future sale of the property to ensure that affordability can be maintained and have the ability to scatter the land trust sites throughout the community. The disadvantage of a land trust is that it will take significant financial resources to purchase the land rights and those resources are never recovered during the period that the property remains City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3C, Page 17 CMP Part 3C. Housing Plan affordable. Orono may evaluate if joining the West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust is the most efficient way to use its resources to provide affordable housing. 7. Update Housing study. Recognizing multiplication of households that rent, the City may consider an update of a housing study, last completed in the Navarre area in 1997-1998, to better understand this trend. Further, the city will work to educate renters and owners on Fair Housing_ practices. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 3C, Page 18 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS CMP PART 4A TRANSPORTATION PLAN Page Introduction 2 Purpose and Scope 2 Roadways 3 Fig 1 Functional Classification 4 Table 4A-1 Roadways Classification Summary 5 Table 4A-2 A Minor Arterials 6 Table 4A-3Collectors 7 Table 4A-4 MSA Roads 8 Table 4A-5 Road Design Capacity 9 Table 4A-6 Road Capacity 10 Table 4A -Future Capacity 12 Fig. 2 Ring Road Concept 11 Fig 3 Access Curve 12 Fig. 4 Maintenance/ Cost Curve 14 Table 4A-8 Maintenance 15 Trails 16 Lake Access 18 Table 4A-9 18 Transit 22 Freight 22 Aviation 22 Implementation Plan. 23 Table 4A-10 Goals and Objectives 23 Table 4A-11 Transportation History 27 Appendiciesx 4A -A. TAZ Zones B—Map T4A-1 E*istixgFunctional Classification Map T4A-2 Rx�Jurisdiction Classifications P—.Map 4AT-3 Traffic Analysis TLAZ--zones L -.-Map 4AT- 4 Traffic and Crash InformationEvk4ft. T,.aW4 ALetuf e F-. Map 4AT-5 ADTForecasted Traffic Information G -.-Map 4AT-61 ting-nNon-motorized facilities and Points of Interest H -.--Map !AT --7 Existing and Planned Transit Infrastructure 1—Map 4AT-8 Freight, Rail, and Heavy Commercial CorridorsMetr-epohta F- fei ht Syste City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 1 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan CMP PART 4A TRANSPORTATION PLAN INTRODUCTION The City of Orono's transportation system generally operates well today. The City's multimodal transportation system includes facilities for personal vehicles, freight, walking, and bicycling. Facilities are operated by a number of agencies, including the City of Orono, Hennepin County, Three Rivers Park District, MnDOT, and Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railroad. This transportation chapter has been prepared in compliance with state statues and applicable Metropolitan Council guidelines. As part of this plan, the City has reviewed existing and future conditions for each mode and identified safety, operations, and network improvements that will be important to address before 2040. The City has also developed goals, objectives, and strategies to preserve and improve the transportation system. PURPOSE AND SCOPE Metropolitan Council 2040 Transportation Policy Plan (TPP) This plan has been prepared to be consistent with the regional transportation strategies outlined in the Metropolitan Council 2040 Transportation Policy Plan (TPP). The TPP is a regional plan that evaluates the existing transportation system, identifies transportation challenges to the region, and sets regional goals, objectives, and priorities to meet the transportation needs of current residents while accommodating the region's anticipated growth. The TPP also guides local agencies in coordinating land use and transportation and established regional performance measures and targets. The TPP is guided by the following goals: ■ Transportation system stewardship: Sustainable investments in the transportation system are protected by strategically preserving, maintaining, and operating system assets. ■ Safety and Security: The regional transportation system is safe and secure for all users. ■ Access to Destinations: People and businesses prosper by using a reliable, affordable, and efficient multimodal transportation system that connects them to destinations throughout the region and beyond. ■ Competitive Economy: The regional transportation system supports the economic competitiveness, vitality, and prosperity of the region and State. ■ Healthy Environment: The regional transportation system contributes to communities' livability and sustainability while protecting the natural, cultural, and developed environments. ■ Leveraging Transportation Investment to Guide Land Use: The region leverages transportation investments to guide land use and development patterns that advance the regional vision of stewardship, prosperity, livability, equity, and sustainability. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 2 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan ■ Lake Access, Preservation, and Management. Access to the Lake recognizes the value of the lake and reinforces the desire to protect its value to the community and the region. Funding is a key constraint that is acknowledged in the TPP. Current transportation revenue will not meet the region's transportation needs through 2040. As a result, the TPP includes two long- term investment scenarios: a fiscally -constrained scenario under current revenue, and an increased revenue scenario that identifies priorities should additional transportation funding become available. Under the current fiscally constrained revenue scenario, the TPP is focused on operations and maintenance of the existing transportation system. Investments in highway mobility and access are limited to those that address multiple TPP goals and objectives. The increased revenue scenario would allow additional investments in operations and maintenance, as well as regional mobility, access, safety, and bicycle/pedestrian improvements. However, congestion cannot be greatly reduced under even the increased revenue scenario. Under both scenarios, proposed investments are focused on areas of the metro with the greatest existing and future challenges and anticipated growth. Orono's Place within the TPP Orono is classified by the Metropolitan Council under the Emerging Suburban Edge and Rural Residential community designations. The TPP does not include any planned regional investments in Orono. Density Allocation In Orono, with two communityies on one, rural and urban, Orono finds that higher density development sites are most appropriate adjacent to high volume transportation corridors, within MUSA, and near commercial services (employment, shopping, etc.) While historically located primarily in the Navarre area, additional appropriate sites were identified in the north Orono area, due in part to capacity and safety constraints of the County Road 15 and 19 intersection in Navarre. ROADWAYS The sections below provide information about the existing and future roadway system within Orono; including functional classification, jurisdictions, capacity, safety, access management, and maintenance. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 3 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan 1, -- i Image: MnDOT Figure 4A-1. Functional Classifications Functional Classification System The Functional Classification System organizes a roadway and street network that distributes traffic from local neighborhood streets to collector roadways, then to minor arterials and ultimately the principal arterial system. Roads are placed into categories based on the degree to which they provide access to adjacent land and mobility for through traffic. Functional classification gives an indication of the relative hierarchy of roadways in the transportation network. Four classes of roadways are included in the Seven -County Metropolitan Area functional classification system: principal arterials, minor arterials, collector streets, and local streets. Map 4A-IT-1—shows the existing functional classification of each road in the City of Orono and Map 4A -2T2- shows existing roadway jurisdiction. The following sections describe each functional class in greater detail and indicate which roadways fall into each classification. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 4 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan Table 4A-1 Roadway Classification SummaLy Table Criteria Principal Minor Arterial Collector Local Street Arterial Place Connections Interconnects Interconnects Interconnects Interconnects metro centers major trip neighborhoods blocks and regional generators and minor within business business neighborhoods concentrations concentrations and land parcels within Intersections Grade separated Traffic signals, All -way stops, As required for or high-capacity roundabouts and roundabouts and safe operation intersection cross -street stops some traffic controls signals Parking None Restricted as Restricted as Usually necessary necessary unrestricted Mobility Highest High Moderate Low Access No direct Limited access to Access to Unrestricted property access property properties is property access common Typical Average 15,000-200,000 5,000-30,000 11000-15,000 Less than 1,000 Daily Traffic Posted Speed 45-65 mph 35-45 mph 30-40 mph Maximum 30 Limits mph Right-of-way 100-300 feet 60-150 feet 60-100 feet 50-80 feet Width Transit Priority access Preferential Designed for use Normally used Accommodations for transit in treatment where by regular route as bus routes peak periods needed buses only in non- residential areas Principal Arterials Principal arterials are roadways that provide the greatest level of mobility and access control. Within the metropolitan area, the great majority of principal arterials are under MnDOT jurisdiction. Principal arterials are typically Interstate highways or other state or US freeways or expressways. Principal arterials also connect to other cities, regions, and states outside of the metropolitan area. Principal arterials are intended to maintain average speeds of 40 mph during peak traffic periods. To maintain mobility and speeds on principal arterials, land access and transportation system connections are limited. There is little to no direct land access from principal arterials. Access is limited to interstate freeways, other Principal Arterials, and A Minor Arterials. Access points are typically grade -separated or controlled with a signal and are spaced approximately one to two miles apart. Within the City of Orono, there is one principal arterial: US Highway 12. The TPP does not identify any specific regional mobility improvements on this highway, including expansion of anX lanes, although maintenance and preservation investments will be made on all highways. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 5 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan Highway 12 is currently 2 lanes, in the "Super Two' Concept. The lanes are separated by a concrete barrier to address safetv concerns raised in the last 10 vears. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 6 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan Minor Arterials The minor arterial system supplements the principal arterial system and provides connections to the principal arterial system. Minor arterials also support access to major traffic generators, including regional job concentrations and freight terminals, and between rural centers within and just outside the region. Access points along minor arterials are generally at -grade and typically controlled with signals or stop signs. The Metropolitan Council has established a system of "A" Minor and Other Minor arterials. "A" Minor arterials are eligible for federal funding administered by the Metropolitan Council. The Metropolitan Council has further split "A" Minor arterials into four types, described below. The City has threeene (34-) miles of minor arterial roads. Table 4A-2: A Minor Arterials A Minor Arterials Other Relievers Au menters Expanders Connectors Purpose Provide Supplement Supplement the Provide safe, These supplementary the principal principal arterial direct roadways capacity for arterial system system in less connections connect major congested, in more densely between rural traffic parallel densely developed or centers and to generators in principal developed or redeveloping principal arterials the region. arterial redeveloping areas in rural areas Other arterials areas without adding are not eligible continuous for federal general purpose funding lane capacity Hennepin CSAR 112_L3 CSAH 6 (2 CSAH 6 (West Willow .. rl five County Lanes) Lanes) of McCulley N (N 0 System CSAH 15 L2 Rd, 2 Lanes) GSAH 6) Lanes CSAH 19 (N CSAH 19 (S of of CSAH 151 15.,-2 Lanes) 2 Lanes) Orono McCulley Road System 2 Lanes Collector Streets Collector streets provide linkages to larger developments and community amenities. They generally do not link communities to one another. Collector streets generally favor access to the system over mobility, but try to balance the two competing needs. These roadways are generally lower speed than the principal or minor arterial routes. They are usually owned and operated by cities, although counties operate some of these facilities. Orono has 20 miles of Collector Streets. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 7 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan Table 4A-3: Collectors 1111111117 Major Collector Minor Collector Major collectors serve higher density Minor collectors serve shorter local trips and lower Purpose residential areas (often penetrating density land uses (often penetrating residential residential neighborhoods for neighborhoods only for a short distance). significant distances), job and activity centers and freight terminals that are not on the arterial system, and they serve longer local trips, including local bus service. Existing Other CSAH 84 (Bayside/Leaf Fox St/Old CSAH 151 (West Branch North Arm Dr) Jurisdictions Crystal Bay Rd) CSAH 51 North Shore Dr) CSAH 146 (Brown Road S) CR 201 (Homestead Tr) CSAH 135 (Tonkawa Rd) Existing Orono Brown Road N Stubbs Bay Rd (Bayside Ferndale Rd W System Old Crystal Bay Road (N of Fox) to Watertown) Hunter Dr Watertown Road Ferndale Rd N North Arm Dr Willow Drive (S of CSAH 112, north Kelley Pky Orono Orchard Rd of Fox) Leaf Street Spring Hill Rd Fox Street (£—ef-Willow to Brown) Casco Point Road Tamarack Dr Ferndale Road W) Dunwoody Ave Wildhurst Trail East Long T.,kona Fox Street (W of Willow and E of Brown) Local Streets Local streets connect blocks and land parcels, and the primary emphasis is on land access. In most cases, local streets connect to other local streets and collectors. In some cases, they connect to minor arterials. Local streets serve short trips at low speeds. Local streets are under the jurisdiction of the City of Orono. Orono currently has 27 miles of publicly owned local streets. Orono's history has had a significant impact on the local road way systems. Northern Rural Orono Roads The straight-line road grid system in central and northern Orono was established along section lines a century ago to efficiently serve the agricultural activity in the City. This grid has readily adapted to use as a collector system for the many local and private roads created to serve new rural residential subdivisions in the last 40-50 years. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 8 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan Southern Lakeshore Roads The seasonal recreational uses that grew up along Orono's 40 miles of Lake Minnetonka shoreline a century ago resulted in a network of winding roads that commonly followed the center of the narrow peninsulas between bays, creating local road frontage for lakeshore lots while also often serving as the main road between settlements. A large number of these roads do not meet current specifications as they are narrow, winding roads with steep slopes. Private Roads A private road is a privately owned and privately maintained road, located in the rural area or within a planned development that functions as a local access street. In order to curb maintenance expenses the city has, since the 1980s, maintained a policy that developments in Orono's rural area would be serviced by privately maintained roads. The city does require that the private roads are built to city standards and that the city is granted an underlying easement to ensure right of access. As a result Orono currently has 20 miles of privately owned and maintained roads. All urban properties should be directly served by the public street system. Rural properties should be served by private streets unless through streets. State Aid Roads To support the state's system of streets, roads and bridges, MnDOT distributes funds for highway maintenance and construction to counties, cities and townships based on a formula determined by the Legislature. The roads that are on the state aid system typically carry heavier traffic volumes, connect major points of interest, and provide an integrated and coordinated road system. The majority of the county Roads within Orono are designated County State Aid Highways (CSAH). The City has 9.45 miles of roadway eligible for Municipal State Aid (MSA). Table 4A-4: MSA Roads Name Description State Aid # Willow Dr County Rd 6 to Fox St MSAS 101 Old Crystal Bay Rd County Rd 6 to Fox St MSAS 102 Watertown Rd Willow Dr to County Road 6 MSAS 103 McCulley Rd Entirety MSAS 104 Fox St Old Crystal Bay Rd to Brown Rd MSAS 105 Brown Rd N County Road 6 to Wayzata Blvd MSAS 107 Leaf St Watertown Rd to Bayside Rd MSAS 109 Ferndale Rd County road 6 to City Boundary MSAS 110 Planned Functional Classification Changes There are no planned changes to functional classifications of roads within Orono. However, four jurisdictional transfers are under consideration based on existing functional classification and traffic patterns. McCulley Road to Hennepin County to tie CSAH 19 to CSAH 6. Bayside Road (CSAH 84) From Hennepin County to Orono. Tonkawa Road (CSAH 135) from Hennepin County to Orono. West Branch / North Shore (CSAH 15 1) from Hennepin County to Orono. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 9 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan Roadway Capacity A roadway's capacity indicates how many vehicles may use a roadway before it experiences congestion. Capacity is largely dependent upon the number of lanes. The table be "' Table 4A- 5 lists planning -level thresholds that indicate a roadway's capacity. Additional variation (more or less capacity) on an individual segment is influenced by a number of factors including: amount of access, type of access, peak hour percent of traffic, directional split of traffic, truck percent, opportunities to pass, and amount of turning traffic, the availability of dedicated turn lanes, parking availability, intersection spacing, si nal timin and aariet f other fa tors Table 4A-5 Design Capacity Roadway Type Daily Capacity Planning Level (ADT) Two-lane undivided 10,000 urban Two-lane undivided 15,000 rural Three -lane urban 17,000 (two-lane divided with tumlanes) Roadway Capacity — Traffic Forecasting The Metropolitan Council uses Transportation Analysis Zones (TAZs) for traffic forecasting. Each forecast study area, in this case the City of Orono, is divided into a series of TAZs (see Map T34A-3). The TAZ data for Orono can be found at Appendix 4A -A. The modeling shows the majority to the projected growth in the city within the TAZs that correspond with City Municipal Utility Service Areas (MUSA) which further corresponds to the cities areas for higher existing and planned densities. Current and Future Regional / Hennepin County Capacity At the planning level, capacity problems are identified by comparing the existing number of lanes with current traffic volumes. The table below illustrates the existing number of lanes on state and county arterial roadways within the City. To identify the need for potential future capacity improvements, Hennepin County compared 2030 forecasts to planning -level roadway capacities. Nearly all State and County roadways within the City have adequate capacity to handle forecast 2040 traffic volumes with little to minimal congestion. (See Map 4A -T4). Based on traffic counts in 2015 the only Hennepin County road currently undersized based on capacity is Shoreline Drive (CSAH 15). The 2015 ADT for CSAH 15 was 17,600. Those roads projected to exceed their design capacity by 2030 are highlighted red below. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 10 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan Table 4A-6: Road Capacity Road Name Type # of Lanes State Aid Current 2040 Route # ADT ADT Estimated Highway 12 Principal Two Lane -divided NA 23,100 UKN Arterial Wayzata Blvd Minor Three -lane -urban CSAH 112 11,000 15,900 Arterial County Road 6 Minor Two-lane, CSAH 6 11,000 8000 Arterial undivided -rural Watertown Road Minor Two-lane, CSAH 6 10,000 14200 (CR6) Arterial undivided -rural Shoreline Drive Minor Two-lane, CSAH 15 17,600 22,000 Arterial undivided -rural Shadywood Drive(N Minor Two-lane, CSAH 19 5,700 7400 of 15) Arterial undivided -rural Shadywood Drive (S Minor Two-lane, CSAH 19 11,900 13100 of 15) Arterial undivided -rural Northshore Drive Collector Two-lane, CSAH 51 4650 5700 undivided -rural Brown Road S Collector Two-lane, CSAH 146 1450 2200 undivided -rural West Branch Collector Two-lane, CSAH 151 1750 2300 undivided -rural Bayside, Leaf, Fox Collector Two-lane, CSAH 84 690 1100 Streets undivided -rural Old Crystal Bay Road Collector Two-lane, CSAH 84 1800 2600 S undivided -rural Tonkawa Road Collector Two-lane, CSAH 135 560 800 undivided -rural Homestead Trail (CR Collector Two-lane, ----- 1050 1400 201) undivided -rural * Data from Hennepin county's 2040 ADT Forecast prepared in 2018 City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 11 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan County Road 15 is the primary minor arterial for commuter traffic through southern Orono. Because County Road 15 abuts the shoreline along much of its route, the City is committed to retaining its character as that of a scenic parkway serving local residences. Such a character is incompatible with its minor arterial function. It would therefore be preferable to reduce the volume of traffic on County Road 15 by providing an additional east -west corridor in southern Orono. However, the configuration of Lake Minnetonka's=s bays and the severe topography between them, as well as the large number of wetlands in the shoreland areas, preclude the development of such a corridor. To address this issue, the Ring Route was established in 1980 by connecting County Road 19 to County Road 6 via McCulley Road, providing a relatively direct route northeastward to Highway 12 from the western Lake Minnetonka area. The City will encourage the use of this ring route to address traffic congestion through the Navarre Area. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 12 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan Congestion policies The City will continue to work with the County and other transportation agencies to facilitate improvements to the transportation networks. This assistance may include right of way or easement procurement, staging of Orono projects, and information outreach. Orono Roadway Current and Future Capacity Collector and minor arterial roads under the City's jurisdiction are all two-lane roadways, are currently, and are projected to remain under their maximum capacity guidelines of 15,000 Average Daily Traffic (ADT). Forecasted 2040 traffic volumes are shown on Map - 4A -T-5. Right of Way Expansion The City has not identified any critical right of way acquisition needs. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 13 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan Table 4A-7: Future Capacity Road Name Type # of Lanes State Aid 2015 2040 ADT Route # ADT Estimated* Fox St Collector 2 Lane, Undivided - MSAS 105 1025 1639 Rural Old Crystal Bay Rd Collector 2 Lane, Undivided - MSAS 102 1948 3116 Rural Willow Dr Collector 2 Lane, Undivided - MSAS 101 4319 6908 Rural Old Crystal Bay Rd Collector 2 Lane, Undivided - MSAS 102 4708 7530 Rural Watertown Rd Collector 2 Lane, Undivided - MSAS 103 4428 7083 Rural McCulley RD Minor 2 Lane, Undivided - MSAS 104 5633 9010 Arterial Rural * the 2040 ADT estimate is based on the 2015 ADT x the Increase in the # of households which is 60% Roadway Safety Providing a safe transportation system for all users is a high priority for the city. This needs to be accomplished through a combination of engineering, education, and enforcement and is to be targeted towards all users including drivers, bicyclists, and pedestrians. The City continues to proactively work with the county and other regional local and state partners to incorporate safety into all transportation designs and efforts. In order to address safety issues on city streets the City adopted a Traffic Management Policy in 2014. The policy is intended to provide a systematic process for the City to address traffic concerns by a consistently applying City Code and other applicable laws and regulations while incorporating a wide variety of traffic management and safety techniques. Access Management The purpose of access management is to provide adequate access to adjacent land development while maintaining acceptable traffic flow on higher level roadways. Management consists of carefully controlling the spacing and design of public street intersections and private access points to the public roadway system. Arterials, being designed for higher speed, longer distance trips, generally have reduced or restricted access, while local streets can accommodate much greater access. Collector roadways fall in between arterials and local roadways regarding the amount of access that is permitted. The agency with jurisdiction over a Freeway Principal Arterial Minor Arterial Major Collector a N Minor Collectar a t.ocal St rsai Cul Da Sac Figure 4A-3: Access �_ _.... Curve City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 14 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan roadway sets access management guidelines. Regional / County Road Access Access to US 12 must meet MnDOT access management guidelines and is ,.v,.,. hied subjeet to senitiens. Hennepin County has established access management guidelines for county roads. Hennepin County requires permits for new driveway access to county roads and when land uses change at a site adjacent to a county road. In addition., the county reviews development plats for access management compliance. Hennepin County typically requires that new access points meet its guidelines; however, the county can make exceptions to the guidelines with sufficient justification. (See Hennepin County Transportation Plan for detailed county access requirements and guidelines). Orono Access Management Management of access to principal and minor arterials is necessary to ensure a safe and efficient arterial system. Direct individual property access to arterials is regulated in the Orono Municipal Code by requiring development of local or private roads to serve new residential developments of 3 or more units; by limiting the number of curb cuts per residence; by prohibiting direct access to principal arterials; and by a number of other regulations involving the location, type and number of access points to the arterial roadway system. However, many of southern Orono's arterials near the Lake Minnetonka shoreline have historically served a dual function as both arterials and as local/collector streets, due to geographic and topographic limitations. It should be noted that there are existing access points that do not meet City, County, and MnDOT access spacing guidelines. In most cases these access points were established prior to agency access spacing guidelines. In other cases the agency has granted an exception to the existing guidelines. As roadways are reconstructed, each of these agencies generally works to modify and/or relocate access points that do not meet current access spacing guidelines in the interest of long term safety and efficiency. Pavement Preservation / Maintenance. Pavement Preservation is a program employing a network level, long-term strategy to enhance pavement performance by using integrated, cost- effective set of practices that extend pavement life, improve safety and meet resident's expectations. As the diagram to Z the right illustrates, as the CY pavement condition decreases, the cost for the appropriate method of repair can increase significantly. Maintenance activities applied to surfaces in better condition, such as sealcoats, thin or structural overlays may prove to be more 0 00 10 75 Time Lowest Annual Resurfacing Cost 409'0 Each $1.00 of Renovation Quality Cost Here Drop Will Cost $4.001 to $5.00 it Delayed to Here. r 40% Quality Drop Total Failure I L2%12% Time 4 8 12 16 Years (Time Varies for Each Road Section) Figure 4A-4: Maintenance/ cost curve City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 15 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan cost effective than waiting until the pavement is in poor condition when it is necessary to perform more costly maintenance or reconstruction. An effective preservation programs addresses pavements while they are still in good condition. A cost-effective treatment in a timely manner will restore the pavement almost to its original condition. By doing so, the cumulative costs of such treatment are substantially less then reconstruction or major rehabilitation over the life of the pavement. In addition the disruption of traffic is less for more frequent and minimal treatments in comparison to larger construction treatments. A proper Pavement Preservation program consists of three primary components: Table 4A-8 Maintenance Type Description Examples Preventive A planned strategy of cost-effective treatments to Chip sealing maintenance an existing roadway system and its appurtenances Slurry or micro surfacing that preserves the system, retards future Thin overlay deterioration, and maintains or improves the functional condition of the system (without significantly increasing the structural capacity). Routine Day-to-day activities that are scheduled by Cleaning of ditches & structures maintenance maintenance personnel to maintain and Pavement markings maintenance preserve the pavement at a satisfactory level. Crack filling Pavement patching Minor Minor Structural enhancements that extend the Overlays rehabilitation service life of an existing pavement and/or Mill and Overlay improve its load carrying capacity. Geiger, D.R., Pavement Preservation Definitions, FHWA Memorandum dated 12 September 2005. County Road/ Pavement Maintenance Hennepin County implemented a pavement management system in 1996 to identify roadway maintenance priorities. The pavement management system tracks pavement condition to help decision making regarding the cost / benefit trade-offs of road reconstruction versus lower level maintenance strategies. The Program is used by the County to develop priorities for pavement maintenance projects on county roads. (See Hennepin county Transportation Plan for details on their Maintenance program) Orono Road/Pavement Maintenance The primary need for Orono Roadways in the coming years is maintenance. Over the last decade Orono had underfunded road maintenance and replacement operations and therefore the roads have fallen in to disrepair. Orono adopted a pavement management system in 2014 to identify roadway maintenance priorities. The pavement management system tracks pavement condition to help decision making regarding the cost / benefit trade-offs of road reconstruction versus lower level maintenance strategies. While a certain share of the City's annual levy is dedicated to Pavement Management Fund (PMF) each year for maintenance, much of the city's infrastructure is aging. This is particularly challenging in the older, more developed parts of the city. Many of these roads are old, were not initially designed to support the land use forms desired today, are not pedestrian or bicycle friendly, and are in need of both infrastructure and land use revitalization. Also a lack of adequate funding for preventive maintenance activities has resulted in a great deal of deferred maintenance. This deferred maintenance has undesirable consequences from a financial as well City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 16 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan as a user perspective, and effective planning is needed to ensure that quality infrastructure is sustained over time. Streets that receive no preventive maintenance are often beyond repair in just ten years, while streets that are properly maintained at critical stages in the life -cycle can last up to twenty-five years or more. Local roadway maintenance has the potential to become more of an issue in the future due to Orono's reliance on privately maintained roads to serve the rural neighborhoods. Orono's 20 miles of private rural area roadways are currently maintained by individual property owners or through neighborhood homeowners associations. Conversion of these private roadways to a public status with public maintenance would result in Orono's road maintenance costs increasing substantially. Bridge Maintenance State and CEounty Bridges The vast majority of bridges located within Orono fall under the jurisdiction of the state and county. Orono Bridges All three bridges under Orono roadway jurisdiction have been completely replaced within the past ten years. These include the bridges on West Ferndale Road, Fox Street, and McCulley Road. The three bridges are enrolled in the state bridge maintenance systems and received bi-annual inspections. The weight capacity of the bridges under Orono jurisdiction are as follows: Ferndale, 36 ton; Fox, 60 ton; and McCulley, 33 ton. TRAILS This section addresses network needs for walking and bicycling within the City of Orono. This section includes information on the existing non -motorized transportation network within Orono, connections to land use planning, the planned local non -motorized transportation network, and the planned regional non - motorized transportation network. This section also includes recommendations for intersection improvements and design best practices. This section also addresses the needs of people using wheelchairs and assistive mobility devices such as mobility scooters, as they are considered pedestrians. Existing Non -Motorized Transportation System The existing non -motorized transportation system consists of sidewalks, multi -use paved trails, turf trails, and paved shoulders. Map 4A-6T--6-depicts the existing and planned trails within the City limits of Orono. There are currently limited facilities for walking and bicycling in the City, and these facilities serve recreational uses better than transportation uses. There is not currently a connected network in place to serve the needs of people bicycling and walking for transportation. Regional Non -Motorized Transportation Network The Metropolitan Council established a Regional Bicycle Transportation Network (RBTN) in 2015. The RBTN establishes regional priorities for bicycle transportation so that regional destinations are accessible by bicycle. Regional multi -use trails within the City limits include the Luce Line, Dakota and Independence Regional trails and are owned and operated by Three Rivers Park District and the Minnesota DNR. Several existing and planned trails and shoulders will be City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 17 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan key links in the expanding regional non -motorized transportation network. A Tier 1 alignment, identified in the RBTN, includes a segment of Shadywood, north from excelsior, connecting to the Dakota Rail Trail. There are no other connections contemplated by the RBTN. Orono Non -Motorized Transportation Network Sidewalks are generally located within newer residential developments and more dense residential and commercial portions of the city. As part of our recreation -open space plan, Orono has developed a trail plan focused on providing links between both local and regional recreational and open space areas, as well as links within the urban areas for pedestrian and bicycle access to Orono's Navarre commercial area and links between the Orono Schools and the Long Lake downtown area. Connections to Land Use Planning The City of Orono has development patterns consistent with its designation as an Emerging Suburban Edge and Rural Residential community. Existing residential development is low density and commercial land uses are separated from residential land uses. This means that people walking and bicycling must cover greater distances to reach commercial areas from their homes. The development patterns in the City are better suited to bicycling than walking, due to the distance between residential and commercial areas of the City. Non -Motorized Transportation Design Considerations As non -motorized facilities are planned and designed, the City should consult additional planning and design resources, including: ■ Hennepin County Bicycle Transportation Plan ■ Hennepin County Pedestrian Plan ■ MnDOT Bikeway Facility Design Manual ■ Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices ■ Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities — American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials ■ Guide for the Planning, Design, and Operation of Pedestrian Facilities — American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials ■ Public Rights of Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG) — US Access Board Accessibility Accessibility is a very important consideration for non -motorized design. All new pedestrian and bicycle facilities must meet the ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) accessibility guidelines. To address accessibility issues, the City developed and adopted and ADA transition plan in 2017 aimed at bringing sidewalks, trails, and intersections into compliance with ADA guidelines. Trail Policy It is the policy of the City to encourage the development of sidewalks and trails. In urban densities, sidewalks should be added to at least one side of roads. In all development densities, connections to the existing or planned trail network should be made or rights preserved. The City will support the expansion of trails and or bike lanes if feasible. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 18 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan LAKE ACCESS, PRESERVATION, AND MANAGEMENT Orono's lakes provide a significant recreational resource for all Orono residents. This value was long ago realized by City leaders. In order to provide lake access for the general public, as well as to provide for fire department access to the lake as a water source, a number of lake access corridors were created as the shore land developed. These typically are platted, dedicated right-of-ways leading from the local road system to the shoreline, and are commonly from 16' to Win width. These right-of-ways (often referred to as "fire lanes" or "lake access roads") vary considerably in their proximity to traffic, parking availability, proximity to housing, lakeshore conditions, and other factors that effect their recreational value. Some of these corridors have been maintained by the City for local swimming beaches or as winter snowmobile and ice -fishing accesses. Certain accesses have docks for fishing, and some have ramp areas suitable for launching a small boat. However, most do not have designated parking available, and are primarily intended to serve the neighborhood rather than the general public. A number of these access corridors have steep topography, shallow water depths, undesirable lake bottom conditions, and/or dense vegetation and experience little or no usage. Of the City lake accesses shown in Table 4A-9, half of those located outside of Big Island are either undeveloped or closed to public use. In addition to Orono's relatively small public lake access corridors, other governmental agencies own and operate significantly larger lake access properties in Orono. These include the DNR Maxwell Bay Access, Hennepin County's North Arm Access and Hennepin County's Noerenberg Gardens Memorial Park. These three large facilities benefit from Metro Transit bus service on their County Road 51 frontage, and are used regularly by visitors from the greater metropolitan area and beyond. The Noerenberg Gardens lack the docks and ramps supplied at the nearby Maxwell Bay and North Arm locations, however the Noerenberg shoreline in Maxwell Bay is a popular place for boaters to anchor and swim. Even more popular destinations for Lake Minnetonka boaters are the Hennepin County beach at Cruiser's Cove on Big Island, and Orono's Big Island Park, which has dockage and hiking areas. Orono also owns and operates Summit Park on Long Lake. Orono offers public lake access through five commercial marinas within its boundaries. Its private recreational facilities with lake shore are Camp Teko on North Arm Bay and the Minnetonka Power Squadron on Big Island. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 19 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan Table 4A-9: City of Orono Lake Minnetonka Access Points - Designated Use and Current ID Access Name Plat Between Designated UPDATED 4-24-2018 or Street Name Section Address #s Use # Notes Brown's Bay (Lower Lake) 1 End of Orono Lane 2-S 1355/1385 Not open for public use; plat map indicates questionable abutment of shoreline - Shoreline Drive - 2-S Across from Shore Fishing Hennepin County provides an informal parking area "Molly's Corner" 1410 and trashcans at this wide spot along Shoreline Drive; (Outlot A, Shoreline popular fishing spot; winter vehicular access feasible. Dragonfly Hill) Fire Boat dockage Smith Bay (Lower Lake) 2 Shoreline Drive at 10-S Adj to 1955 Winter Only Winter vehicular access allowed. Spates 3 North Shore Drive 10-S Tracts S&U, RLS 192; these tracts are on the steep at Shoreline Drive slope adjacent to Shoreline Drive; due to slope and safety issues this access point is not open for public use Crystal Bay -- North Shore Drive 9-S 2605/2655 No longer a public access ("Town Road") 4 North Shore Drive 8-S 3498/3510 Winter Only 30' wide platted road right-of-way at Baldur Park Road -- North Shore Drive 17-N 3685/3705 33' wide eastward extension of North Shore Drive east of Shadywood (Hennepin County jurisdiction) Road 5 Shadywood Road at 17-N 1998/2000 15.2' wide platted alley - closely abutting homes on Sunset Dr either side 6 Crystal Bay Road 17-S Adj to 2264 66' wide platted road extending to lakeshore; City also (West end) Shadywood owns 4 adjacent tiny lakeshore parcels to the east for an additional 200' of shoreline, over which a number of inland private parcels claim deeded access rights for "boating and bathing"... status currently under discussion 7 Crystal Bay Road 17-S 3405/3415 20' relocated alley from Railroad property to (Relocated shoreline; potential lake access from railway corridor. extension of The only known documentation is Doc. #507616 deed Bayview Place in filed Nov. 10, 1908 from Wallace et al to Priebe which plat of "Wallace's states that the 20' strip is "heretofore taken for street Addition...") purposes" and notes that the platted alley between Lots 18 and 19 was vacated by the District Court. 8 Crystal Bay Road 17-S 3339/3345 25' wide platted roadway; contains municipal sewer (Platted extension of lines, potential access from neighborhood and Hillside Place) Railroad/Trail corridor to lakeshore Maxwell Bay 9 Gibbs Landing - Fox 4-S Adj to 3125 Pedestrian Tax records show access as Outlot A, owned by owner St. year-round, of 3125, City has easement over Outlot, City vehicles winter maintains access only City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 20 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan Stubbs Bay ID Access Name Plat Between Designated Use Section Address #'s 10 Eastlake Street 5-N 3424/3465 Winter Only 30' platted road gated March 1 - Dec. 1 I I Bayside Rd. at 5-N 3580/3640 Fishing Dock 33' platted road ("Oak Street" in plat of `Bay View Stubbs Bay Rd. Park') Also used for winter access by snowmobiles off Luce Line 12 Bayside Rd 5-N Across from NA Two 60' platted roads and one 65' platted road to the 3640, 3700, Lake (Park, Spring, and Maple Streets in plat of Bay View Park; and Theresa St. in plat of Ottoville on Lake 3750 Bayside Minnetonka). These potential access points are not opened for public use. 13 Bayside Rd. 5-N West side of NA 30' realigned platted road (Realigned "Lake Street" in 3775 Bayside the plat of Ottoville on Lake Minnetonka) (See street file 3775 Bayside). Not opened for public use. 14 Westlake Street 5-N 372/389 30' platted road right-of-way extending to lakeshore; walking access only. North Arm Bay 15 Park Lane 6-S 607/649 Fishing Dock 60' wide platted road, paved to shoreline - usable for boat launch but there is no parking available 16 Oak Street 6-S Adj to 4119 30' wide platted road, not developed, steep slopes and ravine limit use 17 Baldur Park Road 8-S Across from NW end of platted developed road as it extends to 1384/1392 shoreline 18 Oak Place (Platted 8-S 3768/3818 40' wide platted undeveloped road extending from road in plat of North Shore Drive across platted Cherry Ave to North Shore "Crystal Bay Dr shoreline; mostly wetland or under water View") 19 Sandy Beach 8-S 3898/3908 Swimming 60' wide platted roadway used for City beach (Extension of Maple Beach Cherry Ave Place) 20 Grant Street 8-S 1310 Spruce/ 50' wide platted road, undeveloped 1330 Cherry P1 21 Spruce Place 8-S 1250/1260 40' wide (remaining after partial vacation) platted roadway, undeveloped 22 Loma Linda Avenue 8-N 1098/1130 Fishing Dock 40' wide platted road; also useful for vehicular access Forest Lake 23 Forest Lake Landing 7-N 4415/4440 60' wide platted road right-of-way , access not developed, walking use only 24 Elmwood Avenue 7-N South of 1199 20' wide platted road/alley undeveloped right-of-way leading to shoreline 25 "Summit Avenue" 7-S 1067/1101 50' wide platted road undeveloped right-of-way to (Extension of shoreline Elmwood Avenue) 26 "Buff Street" 7-S West side of 50' wide platted road right-of-way to shoreline, not 1453 Park Dr developed West Arm Bay 27 North Shore Drive 7-S "4795" 33' platted right-of-way corridor extension of Co. Rd. west end (adjacent 19 plus tax -forfeited Lot 10, Block 6, "Bergquist and Shoreline to Orono/M'trista Wicklund's Park...'; undeveloped corridor primarily border) for drainage purposes due to very steep slopes City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 21 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan IDF Access Name Plat Between Designated Use Section Address #'2 28 North Shore Drive 7-S 4731/4745 40' platted road right-of-way extension in plat of at "Adams Street" "Bergquist and Wicklund's Park..." undeveloped, Extension very steep, used for drainage 29 Rest Point Lane 7-S 1340/1345 33' platted right-of-way corridor, pavement does not extend to lake 30 Rest Point Road 7-S 1405/1410 16' platted road right-of-way widens to about 40' at shoreline, paved but no boat launching available 31 Orchard Beach 7-S West of 1530 50' platted road right-of-way extends to shoreline; tree Place growth and topography limits vehicular access 32 Highwood Lane 7-S 4156/4167 20' platted alley right-of-way to shoreline; steep slope Extension to shoreline, undeveloped Highwood Rd 33 Highwood Road 7-S 4051/4075 20' platted alley right-of-way to shoreline, not Alley developed 34 Corral Road 17-N 1785/1825 20' platted alley mainly for drainage but also walking Extension Concordia T� I -D Ae Reiss Name Stfee. Name n��� P4at filen Betnccv`rccrr'oon Addresste" Esc Notes Notes 35 Fagerness Point 18-N Across from Accretions to the 40' originally platted road in the plat Accretions 1965/1985 of "Fagerness"; title registrations by most abutting owners have resulted in dedicated right-of-way no longer abutting shoreline; it appears that there is no ublic access remaining Fagerness Pt Rd Spring Park Bay 36 Casco Point Beach 20-S 2871/2879 Swimming 60' wide platted road ("Carman St") used as a City Beach swimming beach Casco Pt Rd 37 Casco Circle 20-S 3195/3205 60' wide platted road right-of-way to shoreline at the south side of Casco Circle - undeveloped Carmans Bay 38 "Ivy Lane" (Ivy 20-S 3486/3508 60' wide platted road right-of-way extending to Place) shoreline east of Ivy Place - steep, used for drainage 39 "Spring Street" 20-S 2600/2618 40' wide platted road right-of-way from Casco Point Road to shoreline along south side of plat of "Kaster Cove" - undeveloped, walking access only Casco Pt Rd 40 Carman Street 20-S 2490 Carman/ 30' wide platted road right-of-way extending to shoreline, fishing dock 3555 Frederick 41 Lydiard Beach 20-S End of Swimming 66' wide platted road right-of-way extending to Lydiard Rd Beach shoreline, used as a City swimming beach Big Island A N. End of "Lawn 23-N 110 33' wide platted roadway adjacent to Lot 46, Morse Avenue" Island Park B E. end of "Tooisit 23-N 110/120 33' wide platted roadway adjacent to Lot 45, Morse Avenue" Island Park - slope makes use difficult C Unnamed Street 23-N 120/140 90' wide platted r'dway between Lots 38 and 39, Morse Island Park - City has established drivable gravel road for emergency & service vehicle access "Bay Place" 23-N 210/260 50'+1- wide platted roadway between Lots 21 and 54, , L Morse Island Park City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 22 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan ID Access Name Plat Between Designated Use Section Address #'s E "Meadow Lane East 23-S 280/290 20' wide platted roadway between Lots 59 and 60, Extended" Morse Island Park - steep slope makes use difficult F "Meta -Comet 23-S 340 33' wide platted roadway between Lot F Morse Island Avenue South" Park and Lot 3, Morse Island Park 2nd Addition G "Massasolt Avenue 23-S 440/450 33' wide platted roadway between Lot 1, Morse Island West End" Park and Lot 1, Scrivers subdivision of Lot E, Morse Island Park - steep slope H "Meadow Lane 23-S 450/460 16' platted alley between Lots 5 and 6, Morse Island Alley" Park - drivable for emergency and service vehicles I "Pleasant View 22-S 570/600 30' platted roadway between Lot 9, Pleasant View Street" Lake Minnetonka and Lot 3, Island Pointe TRANSIT Orono is categorized as a Transit area IV. Transit Market Area IV has lower concentrations of population and employment and a higher rate of auto ownership. It is primarily composed of Suburban Edge and Emerging Suburban Edge communities. This market can support peak -period express bus services if a sufficient concentration of commuters likely to use transit service is located along a corridor. The low- density development and suburban form of development presents challenges to fixed -route transit. General public dial -a -ride services are appropriate in Market Area IV. The three primary routes serving Orono are Express Route 675 and 677, which provide express service to downtown from the Mound, Navarre and Wayzata commercial areas along County Road 15, and Express Route 674 which provides similar express service to western and central Orono, Long Lake and Wayzata. The TPP's Transit Investment Plan does not show any transitway investments planned for Orono in the Current Revenue Scenario. (See Map T4A-7).To expand the reach of these fixed routes, the Citv will Dromote dial a ride services throughout the citv. The Transportation Policy Plan discusses the expansion of Transit Advantages, though none are expresslX identified within Orono boundaries. Given the limited right of way and therig congestion of County Road 15 through Navarre. improvements and Droarams to expand Transit AdvantaLye in the area should be closely considered. FREIGHT Freight transportation in Orono is primarily served by a Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) rail line parallel to US 12. There are no freight facilities within Orono. The BNSF rail line does not cross any roadways within the City. There are no large freight traffic generators within the City. Most truck and rail traffic is passing through Orono on trips to, from, and through the Twin Cities. Heavy truck traffic is for the most part constrained to roads under Hennepin County and State Jurisdiction. (See Map TAA -8) The development of the lake areas in Orono as seasonal recreational in the late 1800s early 1900's established many of the transportation patterns found throughout the community. In the lake areas, this pattern led to roads that are substandard to today's standards. Local residential roads are not designed for City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 23 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan heavy freight movement. As the City expands its maintenance program, improvements to turningradii adii, width, and stormwater retention are considered. There are no known locations where truck access is not available. All local city roads are constructed to a 7 ton standard, though weight restricted to 4 ton in the spring months to protect the longevity of the road structure. AVIATION Orono is not in an influence area of a regional airport and is therefore not subject to associated land use restrictions. —Airspace protection should be included in local codes/ordinances to control height of structures. There are currently no existing or planned aviation facilities within the City of Orono. However, the City is responsible for airspace protection in order to reduce hazards to air travel within the region. Given the distance to the nearest airports, there are no radio beacons or other air navigation aids located in off -airport locations in Orono. Any person or organization who intends to sponsor the construction or alteration of a structure affecting navigable airspace as defined in Federal Regulation Title 14; Part 77 needs to inform the Federal Aviation Agency (FAA) of the project. This notification is accomplished through the completion and submittal to FAA of Form 7460-1, Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration. In Orono, this requirement applies to any construction or alteration exceeding 200 feet above ground level. The City's zoning code allows a maximum structure height of 30 feet; therefore it is unlikely that any structures in the City will require FAA notification. There are no seaplane bases located within the City. There are currently no heliports in Orono nor any known plans to construct one. Orono will support the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District in the control of seaplane operation on Lake Minnetonka. The existing level of seaplane operation is satisfactory to Orono. The City will support the LMCD in their monitoring of seaplane operation and in any reasonable changes in regulations necessary to prevent seaplane conflict with the primary boating use of the lake. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN This section of the Plan provides the goals objectives and strategies that can help city officials implement the Transportation Plan and make wise long-term decisions. Goals and Obiectives The following table4( A-10) displays the goals and objectives of the Orono Transportation Plan. The goals listed below represent the City's overall vision for transportation over the next 20 years. The objectives listed below provide guidance that the City can use to reach the transportation goals. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 24 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan Table 4A-10 Goals and Objectives Goals ON ective 1. Facilitate efficient movement of 1.1. Regularly assess transportation maintenance needs and include people within and through the City roadway, trail pavement, and other transportation infrastructure maintenance in the Capital Improvement Plan. 1.2 Efficiently preserve and maintain the City's transportation system in a state of good repair. 1.3. Provide safe and efficient routes for emergency and public safety vehicles. 1.4. Coordinate with appropriate jurisdiction (MnDOT, Hennepin County) to provide adequate capacity to relieve congestion. 1.5. Encourage sound access management. 1.6 Encourage, with other government agencies, the expansion of multi- modal and transit services in the city to support resident and business transportation needs 2. Facilitate efficient movements 2.1. Coordinate with appropriate jurisdictions (BNSF, MnDOT, Hennepin of goods within and through the county) to ensure the safe and efficient flow of Freight through the city of City Orono 3. Provide a transportation system 3.1. Coordinate transportation system investments with the Orono Land that is integrated with land use and Use Plan. 3.2. Design, construct, and maintain roadways that fit the character of the development adjacent land use 3.3. Require all new (private or public) residential streets be designed to City standards. 4. Improve transportation safety 4.1. Implement safety improvements to address high crash locations for all users and modes of 4.2. Proactively address bicycle and pedestrian safety concerns along transportation roadways and at crossings. 4.3. Bring sidewalks, trails, and intersections into compliance with ADA. 4.4. Support traffic calming and design to minimize speed on minor City collectors and local roadways. 5. Develop a safe and convenient 5.1. Invest in multi -modal transportation solutions including bicycle and multimodal transportation system pedestrian infrastructure. 5.2. Preserve and acquire adequate right of way for sidewalk and trail construction. 6. Conserve and enhance 6.1. Incorporate storm water Best Management Practices into all environmental resources transportation construction and maintenance projects. 6.2. Incorporate natural feature preservation into road construction project as practical. 6.3 Incorporate Best Management practices for natural resources within the city rights of Way General Transportation Policies 1. Commuter and general arterial traffic must be directed away from Lake Minnetonka. The sensitive environment of Lake Minnetonka, and the property rights of the riparian landowners, are being damaged by continued reliance on this outmoded roadway location. 2. Orono will actively promote use of the Ring Route and Highway 12 to provide viable efficient alternatives to continued over -use of County Road 15. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 25 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan 3. Existing collector and arterial roadways will be upgraded as necessary in a manner that does not encourage additional commercial traffic or through commuter traffic on any of the City's primary north -south collector roads. These roads, specifically Orono Orchard Road, Brown Road, Willow Drive and Old Crystal Bay Road, are primarily located in the rural area and serve a dual function both as collectors and as local streets. Discouraging expansion of their use by non - local traffic will help to preserve the rural character of the area while enhancing safety. 4. Orono will support the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District in the control of seaplane operation on Lake Minnetonka. 5. It is the city's intent to retain lake access (pedestrian, vehicular, boat) for public use. The City will individually evaluate existing lake access corridors and fire lanes as requested, taking into consideration the unique characteristics of each location, such as topography, water depth and quality, lake bottom conditions, the type of vegetation, and any potential for related lake access, drainage, or water quality improvement. 6. As always, both public and private property rights will be considered. To this end, the City will be guided thusly: a The City will identify and take necessary action to preserve the public's right to use of any such accesses which exist but which may not have been formally dedicated. b The City will endeavor to work with property owners adjacent to lake access corridors to ensure that both the rights of the public and the rights of the private landowner are upheld. 7. Orono will consider conversions of private roads to public roads as requested on a case by case basis. The factors considered in evaluating a proposal may include: a. The condition of the street. The condition of the street is consistent with city standards. b. Affected property owners. The desire of the affected property owners. The city does not intend to acquire maintenance responsibility for private roads unless requested by a majority of affected property owners, or c. Safety. If the condition of the road restricts access to the parcels by emergency vehicles, the City may affect the improvements. d. Ownership. Provision of Right of way or an easement Urban Transportation Policies 1. Local streets in the urban area will be owned and maintained by the City. 2. All urban properties should be directly served by the public street system. 3. Urban streets will be constructed to urban design standards. 4. Curb cuts and driveway locations will be limited for traffic safety. 5. On -street parking will be strictly limited. All urban development must provide adequate on - City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 26 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan site parking facilities. 6. The City will pursue additional pedestrian and bike -hike trail facilities. 7. The City will promote improved mass transportation services for urban neighborhoods, including park and rides. Orono encourages improved bus scheduling and improved service, especially at off-peak hours. Rural Transportation Policies 1. Public streets in the rural area will be primarily limited to the existing collector and arterial grid system. 2. The Ring Route concept utilizes as much as possible the existing rural highway system. 3. The City of Orono will encourage all necessary road system improvements required to accommodate and to facilitate through traffic on the Ring Route. 4. Rural residential developments will utilize private road feeders to supplement the existing public road grid. 5. Private rural roadways will be constructed to rural design standards. 6. The City will guarantee reasonable maintenance levels and public access on all private roads. 7. Driveway locations and rural street or private road intersections will be limited for traffic safety. 8. Rural trails are an integral part of the total alternate transportation system. 9. Mass transportation services for rural Orono are not economical, hence the City will promote the use of Park and Ride locations where local service is not feasible. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 27 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan Transportation Plans Table 4A-11 Transportation Plan history Policy or Plan Description Adopted Traffic Management Provides a systematic process for the City to 14 December 2015 Plan address traffic concerns from residents through a consistently applying City Code and other applicable laws and regulations while incorporating a wide variety of traffic management techniques Snow and Ice Policy Established the city's response to snow and ice events Under Review that impact the cities roadways. Setting policies for snow and ice management involves balancing the following priorities: public safety, personnel safety, environmental stewardship, cost and Adaptability. Pavement Establishes the standards and priorities for Maintaining 27 October 2014 Management Plan the city's roads over a ten year time period. Further it identifies the annual Operating budget needs for pavement maintenance. Americans with The plan guides the Cities policies and practices with 13 November 2017 Disabilities Act respect to maximizing accessibility and use of city (ADA) Transition facilities by individuals with disabilities. Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 28 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan Appendix 4A -A. TAZ Data City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 29 Appendix ATAZ Data 2010 2020 2030 2040 TAZ Pop. HH PPH Emp Pop. HH PPH Emp Pop. HH PPH Emp Pop. HH PPH Emp 920 38 12 3.17 6 48 19 2.526 8 60 24 2.500 8 57 24 2.375 8 921 66 24 2.75 215 135 53 2.547 208 307 125 2.456 208 529 221 2.394 201 922 179 58 3.09 120 240 94 2.553 187 315 129 2.442 191 319 133 2.398 190 923 300 118 2.54 247 357 144 2.479 285 381 158 2.411 275 406 169 2.402 249 924 101 28 3.61 14 88 33 2.667 23 89 34 2.618 23 89 34 2.618 21 925 33 14 2.36 3 45 18 2.500 2 52 21 2.476 2 60 25 2.400 2 926 447 156 2.87 190 457 185 2.470 77 465 193 2.409 73 473 197 2.401 66 927 251 93 2.70 9 279 113 2.469 41 300 124 2.419 40 329 137 2.401 38 928 266 98 2.71 16 261 107 2.439 54 280 117 2.393 52 301 128 2.352 49 929 204 77 2.65 0 234 88 2.659 1 276 106 2.604 1 320 124 2.581 1 930 387 123 3.15 11 366 138 2.652 28 400 153 2.614 27 417 162 2.574 26 931 640 224 2.86 51 655 246 2.663 72 698 267 2.614 69 727 282 2.578 66 932 345 124 2.78 11 349 131 2.664 20 346 132 2.621 19 343 133 2.579 18 933 92 34 2.71 2 98 36 2.722 1 100 38 2.632 2 101 39 2.590 2 953 1969 765 2.57 127 2125 825 2.576 101 2177 864 2.520 102 2248 904 2.487 96 954 565 200 2.83 92 611 230 2.657 67 729 278 2.622 70 858 332 2.584 70 955 220 85 2.59 35 226 93 2.430 9 241 101 2.386 18 257 109 2.358 26 956 297 126 2.36 149 315 129 2.442 176 312 133 2.346 197 311 139 2.237 206 957 691 294 2.35 188 766 321 2.386 219 770 335 2.299 217 776 348 2.230 210 958 328 167 1.96 76 431 192 2.245 119 487 220 2.214 185 562 252 2.230 256 971 18 6 3.00 0 13 6 2.167 0 15 6 2.500 0 17 7 2.429 0 7437 2826 408 8099 3201 1698 8800 3558 1779 9500 3899 1801 City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 29 CMP Part 4A. Transportation Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 30 ',0 O O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O O O O O O 0 O O O 0 0 CO M N M O 00 LO M O M O M M N N M Il- N O h M M M N O 00 N M W L O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O_ O O O O O O O N N N M O CO O N M cr LD d' t` M O N N M V O M M m M L0 M LO CO O N y y C O O Q y CO I- 7 O 7 I- M M CO M N W OD u7 M I� LO N W M N M N Y' M N 1- V L0 N CO V 7 7 M N O O y i C. O N N N N N N Ni N N N N N N N N N N C a = 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 7 N LD N M LO V CO N M M r- V 1' O (fl M M O) w 7 M I- N M O V N co 00 (D N N 00 o0 I� u! N �t C O O a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO M N I- V N 00 (0 M O M r- d' _0 N N M N O L` N W M N N W I- _o N CO G W S O O O O O O O O O O O (":'0 O O O O O O O O O O) N M h O <0 O D) M I 7 L0 M W i- N M V CO W M N O M M V M (O N O N y y � 7 O O M = 0 M V V LO O W N 7 O M N N N N M N N L'i 7 a N d' tri M N N a N O O C0 � O 7 `t N I� yy 'p C O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N CL = ;. o0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R L0 OM M N N M V W O M V 0 M O � W M N 0 r- M 0 N N C. O O a T O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O 0 O 0 0 O 0 (O CD NO M O N M I- N O L`(0- N N N W S O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O W In W (fl O V W L()O M V M t0 N M V N 00 M N O M M N M L0 O y y O O N = 0y N L0 L0 O O L0 O co L!) r t` W W W (O 7 V 00 N V N N t` L1) L(') V N (O d' N N V (O (D O O t0 O V t0 M I, O O a c 0 a = w OO O O O O 0 O O0 0 O O O 0 O 0 O 0 0 N L0 V 7 N 00 M CO N f-- M M IT O I- O O W N a' (0 (.0 N co O N _O M M N 00 O O L` M 3 r N N C. O O a T NLO N LO L0 M (OCD) 7 I� 7 N I� N Lr) M a0 cur.) M O M N N M Lr) M M O M N N L0 N O M N M W (D O V E N V o0 h M M (D V 0 V 'V ',I' M M O M t`V 7 M y M N LO N M N L1) O OMO N N N M ((D 0 00 M N O aD y � 3 O O r = Q y t O L0 M N r, o� n r, W LO (fl 00 M f- M M O LO L0 NC N 0o I� O Ln OD 0 v v v (,s 0 r` m LD OR Ln Ln M I� O y '6 CL c 0 N N M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N a = C0 (0 O O N n O O 7 (O O In 7 0- 0 0 � M N LO (D I� N M O N (D M R d' L0 I- M O N r- ": V V CD -,I-M M CO W (O Ln N N M W O O O W (D V C C. O O a N M M V LD CO I� W O d) O O O O O O O O O O W O O O 01 W O W O) F - City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4A, Page 30 �9k6SH0�% a 0 0 W c 0 0 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN Cl) co Turner Road a 0 Drake Dr Existing Roadway Functional Classification November 2018 ` o J 12 � � �� ) � Moon • — St9 c 6Tr.-o `G z • l6 = \ 0 o z N•• 9 �' o `Gt dhq� Iv e 000/ n 0 c Moline Road 0. Q. 1 � �- 26 a v lWad N RaWter W Branch Road County Road 151 0 I Sunnyfield Road E 0 a M M Game Farm Road E J Dutch Lake Dickey 0 moa., e H I 3 Lake Spring 3 o �1 0 Lydian, • z� W K II Long Lake 1 c Z e ey .Ploy+1.. * `• Lake �I ; o! 12 &77%�7 Danie- 1 I • c a�LL 1'01�1 m !Grand Ave , q i , O'a<o 1 oly c p i i 7g Lai OaO S - n R�' l - 'f'0 i 1 wo p J a I I I d CyW v J 0 1 Stubbs Bay Fox St- �® :° L .. — � N • 0 a V 1 r 0 O o Arm 1` e Forest e Lake c Jenning'° 1 Q Bay 2 c 1 � 0 • �. c � ' West L 1 Arm a > 1 vHarrison . . Bay 1 Legend e •r City Limits Lakes & Ponds 2040 MUSA Rivers & Streams 0 3,500 Feet Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT W Maxwell 0 Bay French 1 Marsh Shore Dr 1 1 Smith Bracketts 1 Point Crystal Bc •'' ••�. 1 Bay Point. - Casco • • Doint 1 3 a Blvd W 12 Ave E /1 BOLTN & MENK Real People. Real Solutions. z c J I Minneii Blvd 11 7V rzlia n n _ J Functional Classification Par Principal Arterial A Minor Connector A Minor Reliever Other Arterial o A Minor Expander Major Collector Minor Collector rn x Map 4A-1 Lafayette ,1 <yric Ave - • — — • • — . Ba 1 y Sprint I / y �C Pa �;arrnan's Ba; 1 / Bay Casco • • Doint 1 3 a Blvd W 12 Ave E /1 BOLTN & MENK Real People. Real Solutions. z c J I Minneii Blvd 11 7V rzlia n n _ J Functional Classification Par Principal Arterial A Minor Connector A Minor Reliever Other Arterial o A Minor Expander Major Collector Minor Collector rn x Map 4A-1 i j 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN �q jC6 S H OR�' r Road Drake Dr Painter N Branch Road Road E v 0 m M M Game Farm Dutch Lake FLegend Moline Road 0 CL e City Limits Lakes & Ponds 2040 MUSA Rivers & Streams 000 y 0 3,500 Feet Source. Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT Existing Roadway Jurisdiction BOLTON November 2018 & M E N K Real People. Real Solutions. 12 Sta �o ° Y d Wot ^ .... 7 . m° i ° z E c0 ►" . ® ( 6th 1 1 a ° Dickey 0 woad qke H 1 Lake SPring N z C m ; o Lydiard z. ro�•Pve ® ° Kelle. Y Y�Pk�' m . . Lake A M° m ; Q.oa � w m `• • �: °1\ 0 ;a Daniels $t jr °'re m va ,IJGrand A Orchard��n . a< N O SOW O i / r 1>9 Lak r e Roan r .. .p m �aYskde �d \ � � . _ • Wa Yzata Blvd yy ROaa ,� 90 m . • _• 12 � CY .a ✓ I i � J 0 � l T � � a, ® Fox St m �' • i .. U Pe(lll%� O 0 1 U IE Shore �� 1 2 � 1 1 •% 1 %.• • •� Crystal e, •• ♦ 1 Bay P .♦ `•. 1 ® �yric.Ave • — — • • — • �• 1 1 %• /• e 1 .tee •� 1 �O V Min Ave N z c J :ure.Roadr\�) I J Day�Pl ke Ave 1 1� o° Jurisdictional Classifications MnDOT Municipal Street Hennepin County Private Road Map 4A-2 j2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN Traffic Analysis Zones BOLTON November 2018 & M E N K Real People. Real Solutions. Katrina Turner Road 12 Lake . • d" Y g2 oone,,2��O�V Ave N�PJake 934 Bey ....__.____._.._.924 .. _ .. _ .. _ . _.._..__.._.._ oy tr Av 0 0 X 9 2 0 0000 z £_ �� 19th Ave N Z 1� T Drake Dr �, a G` Z 6th Ave N 2 937 933 921 Dickey � ,goad 1003 1010 Lake 922 Lake = Springer` o z Geek pveN Clasen '0 o� 927 ' 1. 002 J a��et 0 SKY` 0 Kelley 923 °� Long Lake rd M t.1 � 1001 � r 3 Q 3 a z ��. Wayzata Blvd W �' ♦ Lake a t� moa 0 m ' • • • • �: m 8th Ave N c 9<r Ave z 936 e� ►vatertok� _y 12 Daniels St 926 /P`veN >JJ 935 a h� 3 5 do m L) ,l JGrand A OrcFiargi�n o V 4th Ave N t Moline Road s 0 931 929 ! G , .+• °'g Lai Rid9�o�-rd, 1 000 `o" 932 ch .� ° 'f' ° r� �� as N 996 e 26 I l �Ody n cY9c 928 ,,�°aa-- 12 972 Pa k�Si 974 !1 a R 930 a w m ubbs o°' o° Shoreline Dr Rig Yrata G�ea Highway 12 E ,L B �, • • cn e StF Blvd E m Wayzata Blvd 952 Q Painter Road l°die Oi m Fox St _ A veY Ln °w Q�° 975 �° J r .. _ s; ea cak�,st. 94 995 A ~ H ae Ot Fa 3 c W Branch Road County Road 151'y o V w 955 Ferngai �e �a strha m 3 a North c Bro ns 1 e Road W Pea�et ayzata b Ln iyjc i - R°ad Arm d o w Tanager Bay a ay 00 y City o n rl 'Q0� xwell O^ c 0 B �o Lake 9 71 �Oay USO 94 a French s a,/ 1 1 a Forest Marsh m 'o Sunnyfield Road Ez Lake RShore Dr .gid 0 o Jenning's y w Bay 0 9 , 53 ad Smith 976 993 Bracketts o.° Game Farm RoadE Kvc�c`r 954 Bay Point m a c West _Greys B��B� Dutch v ,�u�O °0 rm Crystal Bohns °o Lake m 000' Bay ,�. lake iu d Harrison �• 9770 a Minnetonka \o� c O tiOr ✓linnetonka B E9 51 Bay Iyo�� 1 Arcola�v° ` ywi°a 992 111 E EdgeW'A • • • • • • ; .\ogo Road 1 1 Highland Ave 2 ; m Lynwood Blvd ° ; 949 ,�-- v Shoreline Dr W Arm DrNort Ave a m 0 �h'rn Lafayette F. °a 1 Rutledge Road ' 'J Rain N � �4SSeXp` 958 . _ _ .. Lafayette Azure Road 970 c DayPI Q ��yric+Ave �N6d —.� Bay •�• Lake Ave Q Legend a ��'� ay``ooq. �' �.•'� ?ter Traffic Analysis Zones 957 ��e '�°day .. e �•• City Limits Lakes & Ponds W`Spring •• 956 p°0 TAZ Boundary -° —..r Park Carman's Lakeview+ _9.59 Bay Bay 9,61 od \ �0 2040 MUSA Rivers & Streams GAO Road yJ #### TAZ ID 0 3,500 e� n M J 969 Feet J` Casco o� Road Siana Point c fan Ma 4A-3 Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, , R0 o p Hennepin County, MnDOT /,°� � � �r�w� 9 490 ® 18 Existing Traffic Volume & Crash Data BOLTON November 2018 & M E N K Real People. Real Solutions. Long Lydiard z� Lake �aca � q•vp 1 N 1600 15 660 � 21850 3 1700 5 � 1 •' • 3... 1 • � 4)— -777 2 � 26 1 ♦ sign R 1 ,� d 1 1 � _ • • 12 3 °a 2 2 i I ,..,�� 1 � -• 12 ' l lu 1- 1 `+r -J f c q �r p 2 Arm Dr 850 3 Stubbs 1 o I ami • (7� jl® load o BayLn P-ainte �'' 0 680 1 <°'s+ c° 1 1 4 1000 6 1 7••_. �1 �" IW Branch Road �� 1 ' O 330 5 3 2 2 4 1300 0 1 0 1 North �k Browr 1 2 1 Ln Tanager Ba 2 N 1 Arm Maxwell 1 1 Lake y ` 2 + 1 2 Bay French 1 1 2 2 10�1� q Forest Marsh I 6 Lake 1 7 q H 15 9 1 Jennino' 1 3 1 `- 2 Bay ; 4300 1 2 1 7 1 �800d' q Smith Bracketts 1 1 • • .Ld" 14 • � Point 2 2 West q 2 ♦• • �. 2 1 1 Arm 4) Crystal Bones �•' �.• 1 1 Bay Point• �•. �• HaBay rrison 1 1 .. _ 5 • • 1 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN 1 Turner Road r i` e 0 ® © 10 4500 Drake Dr 0 400 3 2 a c 1 r D. 6 c Lake 8007 ® S 2 Lake GteeK c ?DO 000 30 Classen a1 Ci o —�J OO 'r�o�-4900 8 7400 4 13 0 r 3 2 1 ai 1 3 1 2 3° r 2 2 12 4 ° W o0 1 ��. CL o� i 1 1 1 r 4jS N 2 s 1 0 r N Sunnyfield Road E Legend 13 1 Dutch Lake 1 6 � 1 1 ' 2 13 1 3 2 6 3 14 R NOhrn- �Ave 2 420 .13 8 e 1016 1 ' 1 � 13700 3 e' � ,*Z!� � I � I • ._.._.._ 7 7 1301 5 3 1 9 3 97 1 e City Limits Lakes &Ponds Q 2 1 1 (241 2040 MUSA Rivers & Streams 2 9 �; r • • •� I 0 3,500 •' � 5 � 4)O Feet ' • Casco : 3 - 1 .3 10 Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, 1 ( ��q a q I Hennepin County, MnDOT • �'' – " – • • – rtsw 1 (w e 8 1 Ave N 9. � q Na , U �n2 Bay 2 1 © 9 1 2 2 I�`1 1 1 -- Traffic and Crash Information Average Annual Daily 0 0 �0'9 Y � #### 2014 Moot #### 2013 Q Incapacitating Injuries 2012 Fatalities Lake Non -Intersection Crashes (2006 - 2015) (2006-2015) Pedestrian � Incapacitating Injury o7b Bicycle Fatal Injury �2�, 6 � 6th Ave N 12 4 1� Long Lydiard z� Lake �aca � q•vp 1 N 1600 15 660 � 21850 3 1700 5 � 1 •' • 3... 1 • � 4)— -777 2 � 26 1 ♦ sign R 1 ,� d 1 1 � _ • • 12 3 °a 2 2 i I ,..,�� 1 � -• 12 ' l lu 1- 1 `+r -J f c q �r p 2 Arm Dr 850 3 Stubbs 1 o I ami • (7� jl® load o BayLn P-ainte �'' 0 680 1 <°'s+ c° 1 1 4 1000 6 1 7••_. �1 �" IW Branch Road �� 1 ' O 330 5 3 2 2 4 1300 0 1 0 1 North �k Browr 1 2 1 Ln Tanager Ba 2 N 1 Arm Maxwell 1 1 Lake y ` 2 + 1 2 Bay French 1 1 2 2 10�1� q Forest Marsh I 6 Lake 1 7 q H 15 9 1 Jennino' 1 3 1 `- 2 Bay ; 4300 1 2 1 7 1 �800d' q Smith Bracketts 1 1 • • .Ld" 14 • � Point 2 2 West q 2 ♦• • �. 2 1 1 Arm 4) Crystal Bones �•' �.• 1 1 Bay Point• �•. �• HaBay rrison 1 1 .. _ 5 • • 1 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN 1 Turner Road r i` e 0 ® © 10 4500 Drake Dr 0 400 3 2 a c 1 r D. 6 c Lake 8007 ® S 2 Lake GteeK c ?DO 000 30 Classen a1 Ci o —�J OO 'r�o�-4900 8 7400 4 13 0 r 3 2 1 ai 1 3 1 2 3° r 2 2 12 4 ° W o0 1 ��. CL o� i 1 1 1 r 4jS N 2 s 1 0 r N Sunnyfield Road E Legend 13 1 Dutch Lake 1 6 � 1 1 ' 2 13 1 3 2 6 3 14 R NOhrn- �Ave 2 420 .13 8 e 1016 1 ' 1 � 13700 3 e' � ,*Z!� � I � I • ._.._.._ 7 7 1301 5 3 1 9 3 97 1 e City Limits Lakes &Ponds Q 2 1 1 (241 2040 MUSA Rivers & Streams 2 9 �; r • • •� I 0 3,500 •' � 5 � 4)O Feet ' • Casco : 3 - 1 .3 10 Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, 1 ( ��q a q I Hennepin County, MnDOT • �'' – " – • • – rtsw 1 (w e 8 1 Ave N 9. � q Na , U �n2 Bay 2 1 © 9 1 2 2 I�`1 1 1 -- Traffic and Crash Information Average Annual Daily Intersection Summary (2006-2015) Traffic (AADT) ® Total Crashes #### 2015 #### 2014 Severity Summary (Quantity) #### 2013 Q Incapacitating Injuries 2012 Fatalities Non -Motorized Crashes Non -Intersection Crashes (2006 - 2015) (2006-2015) Pedestrian � Incapacitating Injury o7b Bicycle Fatal Injury Map 4A-4 111 Nr7�7` \� gkESI / Ga 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN 1 Turner Road CD CD CD Drake Dr N N 2300 2500 6300 2900 3600 _6300_8100 600 7200 1100 GteeK 1800 3400 F4200 800` Z,--- f rn T ` 0 Moline RoadM c 0 1900 c 650 V 2200 0 1000 1 1900 300 350 0 v Legend 12 1p, 0t7 ke 0 1400 II ----14000 400 3506800 x41 1300 YLuu Lake Z L,r-���400 5200 Classen 'o�140\ ' 14200 1000 5500 Kelley F 2800 7400 5500-� 7900- Z 19007 m a >s M 12 Existing and Projecteffraffic Volume BOLTON November 2018 & M E N K Real People. Real Solutions. L � <o Y Moot �' � ' 6400 `�° ' •� _ 7500 L4800 s c 7400 E .• .. .. 1 Z q�e �000 ~ , 6500 8000 a N d 500 Dicky o F,oa,\ 1 take = Spripq ` Lydiard 312000 Long Lake .159.00 Lake 3900 �•• �. voM i Ohard�h r ?W3�a�yO za,+��O..•`4 � j000 lgyp�uv rcV O,0'0 a Gran It c 0,' OJR9La/e187011Ooy 850 700 — 0800 o� 670 143000S 3501100 o-, _ 00. 430 12 �Y 560 800690 690 m �° 240 Stubbs ;o o o ;Shoreline Dry l 1100 y� roi 3 1 19200 ° . • ~-� - Bay / 410 V �( m Fox St 22000 _ ,o .4ey Ln °o m o 1000 2800 .. _ !siQe O� e a 0 ego A 0 1 North o p Brow Fernda/e Road W e�F vvi, Z. w c Tanager Bay 1 Ba' Arm �0 Maxwell N Lake \,f\ehaha CrE Bay French91 h a, est -4 Marsh e 46501800 1450 4500 1,2600 2200 5000 1750 4500 oie�t 804100 75d 500 1 2300 4800 .00 5600.x1 Sr 4100 2 ?8S0 550_5400 R5 1100 4800 14600 Smith Bracketts 1 .Li 16100 y _ 4800 600 700 1500 Ba Point �° _a, .i Nest LTA ♦•' A •' W 0 7�3'�0 c Crystal L._ • • . 1 I Bay Point.-♦ •�••�, Harrison °. • .•♦0% • �' • `, 1 Ba 1 h7.00 1 . , 4 J*= 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN Existing Non -Motorized Facilities & RBTN November 2018 BOLTN /1 & MENK Real People. Real Solutions. °��'•■: Ca r 3trina ,... ........._. — _ .. _ .. _ . .``M 12 k .. — .. — Moon y ri� ZTurner Road a _ _ .. <e roo y QJe � on >, z - E. • minj �� 19th Ave.N J191� N r` Drake Dr o z ca♦ ® ;e 33 � f- • • sth o. ' v ©. _ ♦♦. ♦♦`` woad q�e H 1 `'f r� r- ■ ■ r r ■ ■ •/ U N � z ♦ • ♦ L_ Pve z0 a o • / r ■ r ■ Kelley,�pkt?Y .-... `• •♦♦ ;W Z .a —.��aa 2 • 12 .o o P 9 .� o tet it Ave xV zO ole G•LL O N d m jJ Orch _. Wayzata ej> Moline Road "a P� Grand Ave ard��n G ... �e' ♦♦ j v 4th,Ave N t 19 N owh Roa d a 1 •sem '•. • ♦ �`sm P • Ysiere � d ..... _.,Qr E 2 Park Highway,j f►.♦ Ric St F F♦♦�► 1 ,& W Stubbs I .r ke r al'2ata■BIvdE ♦.rr.rrrrrrrrrrn.rr, La irrrrr■ S V � 1 � t _ F Road Bay - — •. • v Painter Fox St ��. ♦ 16 ♦ W Branch Road County Road 151 1 �e ae ♦ ♦♦ o North Browns I Pe Fe�� ♦ v Arm anager Bay j Maxw­11 Lake Non -Motorized Facilities & Points of Interest �Bay French Sunnyfield Road E Forest ° Marsh ; Points of Interest Regional Trails Q Marinas Dakota Rail a Lake > 0 Denning Regional Trail R z c I y Bay A I Q Navarre Lake Smith m c I _ N Shore Dr Game Farm Road E • • Bracketts I Orono Hight' Independence �, '• YY Bay Point © School Regional Trail 1 we �•' '. Q Orono Ice Arena Lake Minnetonka Dutch Arm Crystal �'., I Orono LRT Regional Lake > Bay Point•• ��•. ; Trail 1 M Harrison • . ,� • . Intermediate Luce Line State c Bay 1 1 ; School Trail L E e oreline.Dr 1 0 Orono Middle Lynwood Blvd E — - • — .. _ .. _ : t • sn I Tier 1 RBTN 0 j 3 School Alignment r �a SJR. Lafayette I a Schumann Elementart' Tier 2 RBTN <,yric Ave — — • • —. Bay �' e 0 School Alignment �• •� i•• r Tier 2 RBTN Legend e 4f �.•' �.• Pa Other Trails Corridor i Existing Regional Trail c _ City Limits Lakes & Ponds Sprin f �• N ♦ Search Corridors �, • r' p Carman's M I ♦ ♦ ♦ Planned v Bay !� ♦ ~ Regional Trails - �� Ba , 2040 MUSA Rivers & Streams i .� ', �= /" v & Local TrailsAdditions 2040 System °� o Additions x 0 3,500 e Feet ni� • `• • Casco • • Point 1 M a 4A-6 Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, �•. sp Hennepin County, MnDOT ' —" —' • — ertswd 5.> 1 j 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN �9kesxo�% Turner Road s 0 0 Drake Dr W Branch Road E v' R 0 m Game Farm Road E J Dutch Lake Legend 0 Existing and Planned Transit Infrastructure BOLTON November 2018 I & M E N K Real People. Real Solutions. Jenning I Q 2 I Bay ; Smith '' ♦ Bay Bracketts Point w I West ♦•� 1 Arm Crystal Bohns •' �. Bay Pnint •♦ •. Harrison .. - �.♦ • �' Bay line or _.. _.. tL o .�- I Lafayette <,yric Ave a... a. , Bay �' 1 ' %+ ' ♦�. e •• + City Limits Lakes & Ponds Sprint: 1 ♦ .• -..� Park Carman's Bay ► Bay .' � ♦'� 2040 MUSA Rivers & Streams i ��♦ • in Y 0 3,500 e� .♦ ,.a...a..._.._..a...♦ Feet n Casco • • Point 1 Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, •. �.. Hennepin County, MnDOT " — " — � e°,��,1 Ave Wayzata Bay Transit Infrastructure E Ave N It Park and Ride Transit Advantages k P,arL Existing HOT Lane Transit Routes Meter Bypass 0 Transit Centers Shoulder Lane o Transit Stops Map 4A-7 Z c J Katrina Lake r ) ( \, < L L � Moog 12 S �, o �9 .-.� ...,..-_ f •— U c Lake 'G Z L M [ 1 o ° a G ° z � ~ e 1 sq�e 1 Dickey c woad H Lake �+ Lake c Spring 1 ; �P,veN Classen 0 o� Lydiard Z' ° Kelle Y Y 00 Long Lake M ° ° �PkJ? ._.,., `•• Lake; � c ° moa e m -0m12 Daniels St �. .�• M\ Moline Road 0 G 'S MiT °'F m H v Orcfiardr�n o� y< U-4, CL 101Vn •I Grand A ° ` oOg Road Lak`o 19 N N a. boy Ws yi • �ay�ae io, W ,.. Wa .. Yzata Blvd W 12 1 Stubbs J 0 W�> Bay y Fox St m ,ounty Road 'o 151 Wv N '' `Qj • F �e�aa 1 c c North p a Brow, P_e e� �F ' �o Arm Maxwell Tanager Lake Bay t 1� Bay French Forest Lake Shore Dr Marsh Jenning I Q 2 I Bay ; Smith '' ♦ Bay Bracketts Point w I West ♦•� 1 Arm Crystal Bohns •' �. Bay Pnint •♦ •. Harrison .. - �.♦ • �' Bay line or _.. _.. tL o .�- I Lafayette <,yric Ave a... a. , Bay �' 1 ' %+ ' ♦�. e •• + City Limits Lakes & Ponds Sprint: 1 ♦ .• -..� Park Carman's Bay ► Bay .' � ♦'� 2040 MUSA Rivers & Streams i ��♦ • in Y 0 3,500 e� .♦ ,.a...a..._.._..a...♦ Feet n Casco • • Point 1 Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, •. �.. Hennepin County, MnDOT " — " — � e°,��,1 Ave Wayzata Bay Transit Infrastructure E Ave N It Park and Ride Transit Advantages k P,arL Existing HOT Lane Transit Routes Meter Bypass 0 Transit Centers Shoulder Lane o Transit Stops Map 4A-7 Z c J 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN �9k6SH��% a, Turner Road s 0 0 Drake Dr W Branch Road E m 0 m 'Game Farm Road-E,---zJ Dutch Lake Legend 210 Katrina Lake c ? moa 3 �eA � '• aGJ\ Moline Road m 'S CL 19N .2 � •r.. .... J- . Lake C ;en z a M 1150 Kelley R y �12 O 1 d M J � Stubbs Bay F m Freight, Rail, and Heavy Commercial CorridorsBOLTON November 20180 & MENK Real People. Real Solutions. L <o L Moot 7 Y 9 � rte+ c Lake • _ c( 1 Z %j ~ i s q�e 1� Dickey c Road V Lake Q: S.,_:- ��� Long Lake "• .0..i; Lydiard Lake ox St 151 W P. Ia g North O Tana er Brow, 0 Arm Maxwell LakeBay a 1L Bay French Forest Marsh Lake Shore Dr Jenning I Q 2 Bay Smith ' Ba Bracketts Bay Point I West ♦•� �• 1 Arm Crystal Bohns •' • �. Bay Pnint..♦ �`••`• Harrison .. - �.♦ • �' Bay line or _.._.._.. t` 1 `�d 5 Lafayette 1 <,yric.Ave - • • -. Bay 7C � copy ♦�• � •' ♦'♦ e City Limits Lakes & Ponds Sprinc; 1 - .• -..r' Park Carman's Bay ► Bay ♦'� 2040 MUSA Rivers & Streams G ♦�.♦ • •, ♦; 0 3,500 e Feet n' `` • Casco Point 1 Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, �•. Hennepin County, MnDOT �O Wayzata Bay Ave E Corridors and Information LU z c J o� n ^,a AveAve� o 4th Ave N Truck Highway Heavy Commercial Average Corridors Daily Traffic (HCAADT) Tier 2 #### 2012 #### 2016 Tier 3 Railroad ii Class 1 CMP Part 4B. Sanitary Sewer Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS CMP PART 4B SANITARY SEWER PLAN Page Introduction 413-2 Existing Sanitary Sewer System 413-3 Table 4B-1 Lift Stations 4B-5 Table 413-2 Sanitary Sewer Agreements 413-6 Table 4B-3 Existing ISTS Systems 413-7 Forecasts 4B-7 Table 4B-4 Sewer Allocation Forecasts 4B-8 Table 413-5 MCES Projections 413-9 Table 4B-6 Sanitary Sewer Flow 4B-9 Table 413-7 Sanitary Sewer Projections 413-10 Table 4B-8 Interceptors 4B-11 Table 413-9 Septic Projections 413-11 Table 4B-10 Septie PfejeetionsDry/ Wet I&I comparison 4B -142 - Inflow And Infiltration 4B-4-214 Table 413-111&1 Infiltration Projects 4B-15-3 Orono Goals and Policies 413-14 Future Sanitary Sewer System 413-15 Table 4B-12 Priorities 4B-17-5 Table 413-13 Projects 413-186 Table 4B-14 Maintenance 413-204-7 Appendix A, WES Faeility Map D, 4B -A Orono ISTS Ordinances "elate' to Waste WateN 413-13 Illicit Discharge and Connection -Ordinance Division 5, Subdivision V 413-C MS4 Permit 413-1) Copies of Agreements since 2008 E City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4B, Page 1 CMP Part 413. Sanitary Sewer Plan INTRODUCTION The City of Orono is required to prepare a Community Management Plan that aligns with the Metropolitan Council's Metropolitan System Plan every ten years per Minnesota Rule 473.858. An important part of the Community Management Plan is the Sanitary Sewer Plan, which describes the existing sanitary sewer system and outlines the timing and sequence of future improvements. The Sanitary Sewer Plan allows the City and Metropolitan Council to build and improve their sanitary sewer collection and treatment systems so that development can occur in the most efficient and cost-effective manner. This document serves as the sanitary sewer component for the City of Orono's 2040 Community Management Plan. The City of Orono's Sanitary Sewer Plan was developed to meet the requirements of the Metropolitan Council's Thrive MSP 2040 Water Resources Policy Plan. The Thrive MSP 2040 Plan was approved in May 2015 and outlines regional goals for the wastewater system, including environmental sustainability, water reuse, and water conservation. Additionally, the Thrive MSP 2040 Plan includes population, household, and employment projections, and projected wastewater flows. As a result of projected population increases and land use changes in Orono, the Metropolitan Council estimates that sanitary sewer flows will increase approximately 20% between 2010 and 2040. This Sanitary Sewer Plan serves as a guiding document for City infrastructure improvements and expansion. It also outlines the locations in which the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) can expect to see increased wastewater flows, allowing the Council to determine if capacity upgrades will be required at regional wastewater treatment plants and interceptors. Background The City of Orono is located in western Hennepin County and is bordered by Medina to the north, Wayzata and Plymouth to the east, and Minnetrista and Independence to the West. The Cities of Long Lake and Minnetonka Beach are completely contained within Orono. The City of Orono is primarily residential and is dominated in the south by Lake Minnetonka. Approximately 34% of the City is covered by lakes and wetlands. Orono is classified by the Metropolitan Council under the Emerging Suburban Edge and Rural Residential community designations. Orono's long range land use plans call for permanent maintenance of the existing low density rural residential areas. There is to be no staged growth plan for conversion of low density residential uses to higher density residential uses, and expansion of the existing urban service area will occur only within a few specifically planned areas. Therefore, the goals, plans and programs for on-site sewage treatment in rural Orono are intended to be permanently self-sufficient. Potential future demands on regional capacity will be primarily from the retrofitting of existing rural residential neighborhoods where sewer is readily available and where residents are willing to pay the costs associated with its installation. The goals, policies and facilities plans contained in this plan are set in the context of the legislative mandate to plan for regional needs through the year 2040 and beyond. These statistics and programs are primarily applicable to the urban areas of Orono and to the municipal sanitary sewer facilities which serve or are planned to serve these areas. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4B, Page 2 CMP Part 4B. Sanitary Sewer Plan EXISTING SANITARY SEWER SYSTEMS Land Use Historic development patterns have resulted in a city which is partially urban and partially rural. The citizens of Orono have decided that a long range planning objective of the City is the permanent retention of the rural community. This objective is in line with the existing developed density of the area, with the similar plans of other cities abutting the rural area, and with the legislative intent of metropolitan planning such that expensive urban services not be over extended into undeveloped areas. Sewering of the urban area was necessary. The character and historic density of land use in the existing urban area of Orono, coupled with its general proximity to Lake Minnetonka both required and economically justified the installation of sanitary sewer to alleviate existing health and environmental problems. Rural lakeshore areas within the Shore land and within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area tMUSA) have been provided with municipal sewer service upon request. Residences, existing or proposed within the designated Shore land Overlay District and within the MUSA for which municipal sewer service was requested were and shall be provided with municipal sewer. However, this policy will not preclude development of such areas using fully conforming Individual Sewage Treatment Systems. Metropolitan Council Facilities The Metropolitan Council Environmental Services tMCES) owns, operates and maintains interceptor sewer and facilities in Orono as indicated in the map at Appendix ^map 413-1. The Orono system is serviced by MCES meters; M431 and M435. Sewage flows from southern Orono are metered at MCES Meter M435. Flows from north central Orono are metered at MCES Meter M431. MCES maintains six lift stations within Orono; L44, L45, L46, L49, L59 and L60. All sewage outflow from Orono is conveyed to and treated at MCES's Blue Lake Treatment Plant on the Minnesota River in Shakopee. Orono's sewer service capacity is limited by the capacity of the intervening interceptors including the Orono -Long Lake Interceptor, and not strictly by the capacity of the Blue Lake Facility. A history of the MUSA expansion can be found on Man 413-2. Orono Sanitary Sewer System The City of Orono owns, operates and maintains municipal sanitary sewer facilities as indicated on die—Map bellew413-3. Orono's sanitary sewer system currently consists of approximately 245,131 ft of Sewer Main, 80,530 ft of Force Main, 1292 Manholes and 44 lift stations, of which a majority was built within the last 50 years. The City of Orono's existing Sanitary Sewer System limits are defined by the boundaries of the MUSA). Because of topography and historic development patterns, the Orono municipal sewer system includes a number of disconnected sections which can be categorized into 5 distinct service areas. In addition the topography of the area has resulted in the City constructing 44 Lift Stations. A map of the Orono System is at Appendix B, City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4B, Page 3 CMP Part 4B. Sanitary Sewer Plan 1. Southwest Orono System(MCES metershed M435): This system consists of two sub systems; the Lift Station 59 system and the downstream interceptors system. The Lift Station 59 system consists of all lines which are upstream from and ultimately discharge to MCES Lift Station #59 (LS -59). The system was constructed with eighteen projects from 1964 to 2007. This is the original municipal sewer system and it still serves the majority of urban Orono. These lines were installed to provide pollution abatement and sewer service to the Navarre business area and to the urban residential areas along Lake Minnetonka. The downstream interceptors system consists of all trunk and lateral lines which directly discharge to the Orono -Long Lake Interceptor (MCES 7113 and 7113A) downstream from L.S. 59 but upstream of Meter # 435. These direct discharges are via City -owned and maintained lift stations pumping into the MCES force main at a limited number of locations. Construction occurred during 1980-2014. 2. Highway 12 Area System (MCES metershed M431): This system consists of all lines which are upstream from and ultimately discharge to LS -60. Construction consisted of sixteen Projects from 1967 to 2018. This portion of the municipal system was initially constructed as an extension of the Long Lake municipal system primarily to provide sewer (and water) service to the Orono High School. This system currently serves all of the urban and commercial area in the North West portion of the city along the County Road 6 and 112 corridor. 3. Long Lake Connections. This system consist of all of the lines that connect directly into the Long Lake Municipal Sewer System. The system was constructed in a series of projects from 1970 to 2018. 4. Wayzata System Extensions: Sewer laterals which connect to extensions of the Wayzata sewer system along Orono's eastern boundary. Construction consisted of six Projects 1970-2009. This portion of the Orono municipal sewer system functions as an extension of the Wayzata system serving existing housing adjacent to the Wayzata border. 5. Plymouth Direct Connection. The City has one property directly connected to the Plymouth municipal system, St. Edwards Church on North Ferndale Road. No further connections to the Plymouth system are anticipated. 6. Lift Stations. The Orono Sanitary Sewer system is serviced by 44 Lift Stations, listed on Table 413-1: Lift Stations. 7. Agreements with Adjacent Cities. In order to provide municipal sanitary service in the most cost effective manner the City of Orono partners with neighboring cities. Orono residents are served by connection to Plymouth. Long Lake and Wayzata. Orono provides service to residents from Wayzata. Spring Park and Medina. Table 413-2 below lists the current agreements with other municipalities. Copies of agreements entered into since 2008 are attached as Appendix 413-1). 6 City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4B, Page 4 CMP Part 4B. Sanitary Sewer Plan Table 4B-1: Lift stations LS # Type Address Street SCADA Generator Flow (GPM) Met Council Meter LS -1 Lift 1302 Shoreline Dr Yes 60 M435 LS -2 Lift 1970 Spates Ave Yes Yes 500 M435 LS -3 Lift 3400 Eastlake St Yes 125 M435 LS -4 Lift 160 Stubbs Bay Rd 100 M435 LS -5 Lift 351 Westlake St Yes 200 M435 LS -6 Lift 2478 Casco Point Rd Yes Yes 360 M435 LS -7 Lift 2552 Shadywood Rd Yes 240 M435 LS -8 Lift 2662 West Lafayette Rd Yes 70 M431 LS -9 Lift 1580 Bohns Point Rd Yes 100 M435 LS -10 Lift 115 Orono Orchards Rd 105 M435 LS -11 Lift 1815 Fagerness Pout Rd Yes 100 M435 LS -12 Lift 2030 Wayzata Blvd Yes Yes 240 M435 LS -13 Lift 2919 Casco Point Rd Yes 140 M435 LS -14 Lift 1580 Orchard Beach PI Yes Yes 250 M435 LS -15 Lift 1375 VINE PL Yes 200 M435 LS -16 Lift 1385 Rest Point Rd Yes 100 M435 LS -17 Lift 1074 Wildhurst Tr Yes 100 M435 LS -18 Lift 1330 CHERRY PL Yes Yes 200 M435 LS -19 Lift 1030 Loma Linda Ave Yes 100 M435 LS -20 Lift 1101 Elmwood Ave Yes Yes 100 M435 LS -21 Lift 4265 Forest Lake Dr Yes Yes 100 M435 LS -22 Lift 2890 Shoreline Dr Yes 100 M435 LS -23 Lift 3017 North Shore Dr Yes 100 M435 LS -24 Lift 4015 Dahl Rd 250 M435 LS -25 Lift 780 North Arm Dr Yes 250 M435 LS -26 Lift 1207 Tonkawa Rd Yes Yes 400 M435 LS -27 Lift 870 Partenwood Rd Yes 250 M435 LS -28 Lift 632 Park Ln Yes Yes 325 M435 LS -29 Lift 754 Tonkawa Rd Yes 250 M435 LS -30 Lift 1799 Lakeview Terrace Yes 100 M431 LS -31 Lift 1579 Long Lake Blvd Yes 130 M431 GS -1 Grinder 2635 North Shore Dr Yes 45 M435 GS -2 Grinder 1082 Ferndale Rd W Yes 35 M435 GS -3 Grinder 978 Ferndale Rd W 15 M435 GS -4 Grinder 907 Ferndale Rd W 15 M435 GS -5 Grinder 883 Ferndale Rd W 15 M435 GS -6 Grinder 1446 Shoreline Dr Yes 35 M435 GS -7 Grinder 2472 Carmen St 15 M435 GS -8 Grinder 1023 Old Crystal Bay Rd 20 M435 GS -9 Grinder 1222 Bracket's Point Rd Yes 39 M435 GS -10 Grinder 2048 Shoreline Dr 57 M435 GS -11 Grinder 3980 Dahl Rd 15 M435 GS -30 Grinder 988 Partenwood Rd 15 M435 GS -31 Grinder 994 North Arm 15 M435 City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4B, Page 5 CMP Part 4B. Sanitary Sewer Plan Table 413-2: Sanitary Sewer Agreements with Adjacent Cities Cities Involved Date ... . Table 413-2: Sanitary Sewer Agreements with Adjacent Cities Cities Involved Date Properties Affected Orono/ Wayzata 6/3/1970 Properties on North Ferndale Road Orono/ Long Lake 10/7/1975 Connection of Hackberry Neighborhood to LL Sewer Orono/ Wayzata 11/16/1976 "Herrick Circle" along Old LL Blvd - MUSA Part 4 Orono/ Wayzata 6/8/1981 Lots 104 and 105, Aud Sub. No. 184; 865 and 885 West Ferndale Road - Part of MUSA Part 6 Orono/ Long Lake 6/17/1986 650 North Brown Road connection to LL sewer Orono/ Wayzata 8/25/2003 Properties along Old LL Road; supersedes 1976 agreement Orono/ Long Lake/ Medina 8/10/1981 Includes MUSA parts 2, 3, 5, 19, 20, 29, and 30. Orono/ Plymouth 1/11/2000 St. Edwards Church, 865 North Ferndale Road Orono/ Long Lake 10/3/2000 Fox Ridge and East Long Lake Areas (MUSA Parts 21 and 23) Orono/ Spring Park 4/24/2000 Property at 3800 Dickson Extension Orono/ Long g i ake 12/gin CP eFtmes that ultimately diseh-,Fge t„ Lang Lake seweF i•r Orono/ Wayzata Orono/ Long Lake 7/21/2009 7/1/2011 Orono properties that ultimately discharge to Wayzata sewer lines - combination of all previous agreements into one agreement Glendale Cove properties that ultimately discharge to Long Lake sewer lines Orono/ Long Lake 7/14/2011 Creekside properties that ultimately discharge to Long Lake sewer lines City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 413, Page 6 CMP Part 4B. Sanitary Sewer Plan Orono Private Treatment Systems The City of Orono's rural areas are served by Individual Sewage Treatment Systems (ISTS). A swap of -Existing ISTS's in Orono is at Appendix CMap 413-4. Orono Code regulating ISTS can be found in Appendix 0413-A. This ordinance was updated in July of 2018 to be consistent with Hennepin County regulations and State law. This Chapter-58is Eensistent with "a ceta Pollution GePAT-el Ageney (N4PGA) feg�dlafiens adopted as (Minneseta Rules Chaptefs 7090 708-3)-. The provisions specify technical standards, site evaluations, sizing requirements, and minimum setbacks from floodplains and wetlands for individual systems. Every three years the City notifies homeowners to provide maintenance to their septic systems and submit inspection reports to the City. If a complaint is submitted about a septic system, the city is responsible for performing an inspection of the system. City Ordinances (Section 82-224) allows for the establishment of a central system, with the _goal of connecting a neighborhood to municipal sewer services within 15 years. The City does not activity encourage private community waste water systems unless long term management, including maintenance and funding, can be addressed. Based on City building records, an inventory of septic services is listed below: Table 413-3: Existing Individual Sewage Treatment Systems (2018) Residential 1024 Institutional (Churches, Golf courses) 5 Total On -Site systems 1029 Source: City Building Records All public or privately owned Community Wastewater Treatment Systems are included in the residential calculation. FORECASTS Land Use Orono's land use plan calls for development in both the urban and the rural portions of the City. The urban area will see new residential development on the existing vacant lots and undeveloped parcels at densities of 1-3-25 units per acre. Urban commercial development will be restricted to neighborhood services in the existing Navarre Area and fuller utilization of the industrial and commercial potential near Long Lake. Overall urban density will remain relatively low because of the ecological considerations of proximity to Lake Minnetonka. The rural area will see continued residential development at a slow, steady pace in a manner similar to that of the past three decades. Str-iet sttb&vision r-eview will enstir-e ade on of privately maintained open spaee, City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4B, Page 7 CMP Part 4B. Sanitary Sewer Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4B, Page 8 .,0 :if 01 City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4B, Page 8 CMP Part 4B. Sanitary Sewer Plan Population The Metropolitan Council publishes population and sewer usage forecasts for each city in the Metropolitan Area. MCES use these growth and wastewater flow forecasts to plan future interceptor and treatment works to serve communities. The forecast data in the table below is from the Metropolitan Council's Local Planning Handbook Community Page for Orono and includes both total and sewered population, households, and employment. Table 413-4: Orono Population and Households 1970 - 2040 (Sewered and Unsewered Forecasts) Population Year 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2016 2020 2030 2040 Sewered -- -- -- -- 4,429 -- 5,150 6,170 6,740 Unsewered -- -- -- -- 3,008 -- 2.950 2.630 2.760 Total City 6,787 6,845 7,285 7,538 7,437 7,691 8,100 8,800 9,500 Household Year 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2016 2020 2030 2040 Sewered -- -- -- -- 1,780 2,253 2,105 2,455 2,785 Unsewered -- -- -- -- 1046 784 1,095 1,105 1,115 Total City 2,146 2,291 2,613 2,766 2,826 3,037 3200, 3,560 3,900 Persons/HH 3.16 2.99 2.79 2.73 2.63 2.532.53 2.47 2.44 Employment 500 809 980 951 1 1562 1579 1700 1780 1800 • .KlTfffi71 Source: Metropolitan Council Wastewater Flows All of the existing and anticipated sewage flow from the City of Orono is treated at the Blue Lake WWTP. The treatment plan currently processes 26 Million Gallons Per day and has a planned City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 413, Page 9 Source: Metropolitan Council Wastewater Flows All of the existing and anticipated sewage flow from the City of Orono is treated at the Blue Lake WWTP. The treatment plan currently processes 26 Million Gallons Per day and has a planned City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 413, Page 9 CMP Part 4B. Sanitary Sewer Plan capacity of 40 million gallons per day by 2040 (Council, 2016). The PPele�e-nt Of !he 1980 CMP indicated an ultimate interceptor design capacity assigned to Orono of 3,025 units based on a flow of 368 gp4-GPD per unit (115 gal/person/day x 3.2 persons/household) totaling 1.14 mgd or 416 million gallons per year (MGY). Under current projections which include land use changes proposed in the Land Use Plan of this 2018-2040 CMP, potential Orono flow rates will slightly exceed the annual flows forecasted by Met Council through 2040 but remain below the ultimate design capacity. The paragraphs and tables below depict the MCES and Orono projections. MCES Projections Table 4B-5 below lists projected total average wastewater flow for Orono. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4B, Page 10 CMP Part 4B. Sanitary Sewer Plan Table 4B-5: MCES Sewered Wastewater Proiections 2010 2020 2030 2040 Annual Average Wastewater Flow(MGD) 0.58 0.59 0.65 0.72 Total Flow (average day x 3651 211.7 215.35 237.25 262.8 As a point of reference, Table 4B-6 below depicts the amount of Orono wastewater actually delivered into the MCES system from 2012-2016. Table 4B-6: Sanitary Sewer Flow from Orono 2012-2016 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Annual Average Wastewater Flow(MGD) 0.48 0.57 0.63 0.49 0.54 Total Flow (average day x 177.21 207.73 228.52 177.27 199 3§51 Orono Projections Orono's projects are based on the planned development of the existing Municipal Service Areas. The current and projected connections are shown in the table below broken down by Sewer Service Areas. Note that the projections used in this fepoA- lan are greater than the MCES projections since they rely on flow estimates for each parcel of developable land, rather than population estimates. Residential Equivalents Connections (REC) The table uses Residential Equivalents Connections (REC) to convert non-residential connection into their residential equivalents. The project flows are calculated based on 1 REC = 250 Gallons / Day (1 REC = 2.5 residents x 100 gal/resident/day). Table 4B-7 is projections based on proposed land use projections, applied to each metershed. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4B, Page 11 CMP Part 4B. Sanitary Sewer Plan Table 4B-7: Sanitary Sewer Protections by Interceptor Based on Residential Equivalent Unit (REQ Orono Sewer 2010 2020 change 2020 2030 Change 2030 2040 Change 2040 Service Area M431 458 41 499 140 639 38 677 M435 593 41 634 0 634 66 700 Wayzata 6 0 6 0 6 0 6 Long Lake 1 372 1 49 1 421 1 140 1 561 1 76 1 637 Plymouth 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 Total 2591 99 2690 203 2893 383 3276 Based on Flow (Million Gallons Per Day) 2010 2020 Change 2020 2030 Change 2030 2040 Change 2040 M431 0.11 0.01 0.12 0.04 0.16 0.01 0.17 M435 0.15 0.01 0.16 0 0.16 0.02 0.18 Wayzata 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Long Lake 0.09 0.01 0.11 0.04 0.14 0.02 0.16 Plymouth 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 Total 0.65 0.02 0.67 0.05 0.72 0.1 0.82 City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4B, Page 12 CMP Part 4B. Sanitary Sewer Plan Projections for MCES Interceptors. The MCES interceptors forecasted flow are listed in the table below. The interceptors are in series: 8352A ->7113A->7113 and 8567->7113. Note the flow depicted is only Orono generated flows that are received within Orono and Long Lake. Orono generated flows that go to Wayzata or Plymouth are not included as they ultimately end up at interceptors 7018-2 and 7027-1. Also, note that the total flow listed is only the flow generated in Orono and does not include any flows from neighboring communities that may also discharge into the particular interceptor. Table 4B-8: Interceptors Flow(MGD) MCES Interceptor 2010 2020 2030 2040 8352A and 7113A 0.11 0.12 0.16 0.17 8567 0.43 0.44 0.45 0.52 7113 0.55 0.57 1 0.61 0.69 Private Systems Rural areas of Orono will continue to be served by individual sewage treatment systems (ISTS). Sanitary sewers and other urban services will not be extended into the rural area to promote new development or expansion of urbanization. The city does not foresee much increased density in the rural area requiring additional ISTS. Within the rural area, nearly all water supplies are provided by individual wells and most sewage treatment is provided by individual sewage treatment systems ("ISTS"). A number of specific neighborhoods within the Rural Area have been or will be provided with municipal sewers to solve neighborhood problems or to protect the lakes, but no other urban services are planned for these areas. Table 4B-9: Septic (MCES Unsewered) Projections 2010 2020 2030 2040 Population 3008 2950 2630 2760 Households 1046 1095 1105 1115 Employment 0 0 0 0 Institutional Systems 5 5 5 5 Residential Systems 1041 1090 1100 1110 City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4B, Page 13 CMP Part 4B. Sanitary Sewer Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4B, Page 14 CMP Part 4B. Sanitary Sewer Plan City Of Orono Projections Table 413-9 also projects the number of Institutional and residential systems for 2010, 2020, 2030, and 2040. The table below de-piets the pr-ojeeted number- of septie systems in Or -one based on deye1.,tions f the fur -a! T1 able 4B 10! Septie Projeetions 24N 2-02.0 2030 2M 5 -5 5 Residential Septic Systems 4-04 4024 4M T4-0 Total Septic Systems 4-04 4-� 4495 444-5 4. Actual number- from 2008 2 Aetttal n ffiber f e,,, 1STS data base as of 2018 3. Gity Stag Estimates INFLOW AND INFILTRATION General Inflow is water, typically stormwater, which enters the sewer system through broken manhole covers, sewer cleanouts, sump pumps, foundation drains, and rain leaders. Infiltration is water, typically groundwater, which leaks into the sewer system through cracks in the sewer mains, laterals, joints, and manholes. Water from inflow and infiltration (FI) can consume available capacity in the wastewater collection system and increase the flow into treatment facilities. In extreme cases, the added flow can cause bypasses or overflows of raw wastewater. This extra flow also requires a larger capacity in the city's collection and treatment components, which results in increased capital, operation and maintenance, and replacement costs. As a sewer system ages and deteriorates, FI can become an increasing burden on a City's system. Therefore, it is imperative that FI be reduced whenever it is cost effective to do so. The MCES has established I/I goals for each community discharging wastewater into the Metropolitan Disposal System (MDS) based on average day flows and allowable peaking factors. In February 2006, the MCES began an I/I Surcharge Program which requires communities within their service area to eliminate excessive FI over a period of time. Now, communities that exceed their wastewater flow program year goals, will be required to complete an FI mitigation assignment that will be required to be implemented in 2018. Nonetheless, flow metering data is available for the meter sheds within Orono, and an analysis of this data as it relates to FI is presented on the following page. The City's strategies, programs, investments, and goals for reducing FI are listed in this section as well City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4B, Page 15 CMP Part 4B. Sanitary Sewer Plan Municipal I/I Reduction Much of the City's sewer infrastructure is over 40 years old, and susceptible to I/I due to their age. In addition much of the city system runs along lake shore and is susceptible to high water periods. A comparison of the dry weather flow versus average annual flow versus the average in the peek rain fall week of that ,year by metershed for 2021-2016 is given in Table 413-10. Dry weather flow is calculated as average flow during the months of Januar.. through February. The peek weather week is the week is the week with the most accumulation of rainfall. The purpose of this comparison is toig veageneral indication of the extent of I/I in the region. The data does show a significant difference between peek rain week average and dry weather and average annual flows which indicates I/I. Further action taken by the city starting in 2014 to address I&I appear to be reducingthe e magnitude of the impact particularly for inflow. The City prohibits the connections of foundation drains and roof leaders to the sanitary sewer system, and requires disconnection of the same. These ordinances are attached as Appendix 413- B. Table 413-10 Dry and Wet week I& I Comparison -Add NEEF M435 Meter Area M431 Meter Area Total Dry Dry Dry Average Peak Rain Average Peak Rain Average Peak Rain Weather Weather Weather Year Annual Event Week Annual Event Week Annual Event Week Average Average Average Flow Average Daily Flow Average Daily Flow Average Daily Flow Flow Flow (MGD) Flow (MGD) (MGD) Flow (MGD) (MGD) Flow (MGD) (MGD) (MGD) (MGD) 2012 0.4 0.33 0.77 0.08 1 0.08 0.15 0.48 0.41 0.92 2013 0.48 0.31 1.06 0.09 0.08 0.12 0.56 0.39 1.18 2014 0.53 0.37 1.2 0.09 0.08 0.14 0.61 0.45 1.33 2015 0.4 0.32 0.45 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.48 0.41 0.58 r7720161 0.45 1 0.4 0.67 0.1 0.1 1 0.11 1 0.54 1 0.49 0.78 City code prohibits the discharge of storm water to the sanitary sewer system and requiring the disconnection of existing UI sources (Sec. 14-189. - Prohibited discharges of groundwater/stormwater into the sanitary sewerage system). The city does experience a high amount of home rebuilds, especially along the lake shore which coincides with a large portion of the municipal sewer system. All new construction is inspected for possible cross connection as part of the sewer connection permit process. In addition, the City has routine activities directed at recognizing and correcting UI. During the City's annual sewer system maintenance activities, 20% of the system is cleaned and televised to locate leaks or service connections with continuous flows. Appropriate corrective measures are then initiated with the affected property owner. The results of the inspections are used to develop and prioritize the City's sewer rehabilitation projects. For the past 5 years and programmed in to the future the city allocates $250,000 per years for sewer improvement projects to address I&I issues. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4B, Page 16 CMP Part 4B. Sanitary Sewer Plan Table 4113-11: Recently Completed I & I Reduction Proiects 2013 Sewer Rehabilitation Lining of 4288 Feet of Gravity main; Manhole lining and joint sealing $ 136,786.00 Gest 2014 Sewer Rehabilitation Lining of 4000 Feet of Gravity main; 4 Manhole rehabilitations $ 239,167.00 2014 Sewer- 2015 Sewer Rehabilitation Lining of 4,915 Feet of Gravity main; 35 Lateral linings; 11 Manhole rehabilitations $ 246,198.00 Liniiig of 4,915 feet of gravity fliaifl; 35 La4er-al finings; 11 Manhole .-eh b.;litat' 2016 Sewer Rehabilitation Lining of 6,091 Feet of Gravity main; 20 Manhole joint sealed $ 215,177.00 $215,177 2017 Sewer Rehabilitation Lining of 5,026 Feet of Gravitv main $ 213,338.00 City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4B, Page 17 Pro j ee Description Gest 2013 Sewer- Rehabilitation Lining of 4299 feet orManhole lining and l; ,b 2014 Sewer- Lining of 4000 feet of gfayity main; 4—manhole 2015 Sewer- Liniiig of 4,915 feet of gravity fliaifl; 35 La4er-al finings; 11 Manhole .-eh b.;litat' $246,199 2016 Sewer Lining g ti not feet of ci l+zy rir'cH�1; 20 Manholes joint $215,177 `017 Sewer- Rehabilitation D.--; o..+ Lining 5026 feet of gravity fflain $213,338 City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4B, Page 17 CMP Part 4B. Sanitary Sewer Plan 9VLGOALS AND POLICIES Goals 1. To provide an adequate, safe level of sewage treatment and waste water disposal for all residences and other occupied properties in the City. 2. To protect Lake Minnetonka, other lakes and streams, surface and ground waters from sewage effluent pollution. 3. To achieve the above goals within the financial capabilities of the City and its citizens without becoming an intolerable burden on the landowners or taxpayers. Policies 1. The primary method of sewage treatment and disposal within the Urban Service Area will be municipal sewer. 2. The primary method of sewage treatment and disposal within the Rural Area will be individual on-site systems, because: a. The cost of providing municipal sewer service to the Rural Area is high due to the low density of development and due to the varied topography. b. Development of the Rural Area at densities which would keep the cost of municipal sewer low, would be counterproductive to the City's primary goal of protecting Lake Minnetonka and other Orono lakes. 3. The Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) boundary in Orono will define areas where sewer exists or where it may be extended to serve existing or new development, but will not define the areas where general urban services will be provided, and it will not define the boundary between higher density and low-density development. 4. Orono will provide municipal sewer extensions to lakeshore areas and non-lakeshore areas within the MUSA when it is determined that municipal sewer is preferable to long-term use of on-site sewage treatment systems. 5. The costs of extending municipal sewer to existing neighborhoods will be borne primarily by the property owners being served. 6. The costs of extending municipal sewer to serve new residential and nonresidential development will be borne entirely by the developer. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4B, Page 18 CMP Part 4B. Sanitary Sewer Plan FUTURE SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM Orono's Plan for future sewer facilities includes upgrades to certain existing local sewer facilities as well as retrofitting a small number of existing neighborhoods with municipal sewer service. These system improvements and expansions are not expected to require additional capacity allocation in metropolitan sewer facilities. MUSA Expansion The city proposes a minor expansion of the has ne plaiis fef expansion of the MUSA within the time period covered by this plan. -Future demands on the sanity sewer system will come as areas within the existing MUSA develop. While the City has no staged development plan, and currently has not scheduled projects outside the existing MUSA, any future MUSA expansions will be considered within the context of the following guidelines: P-rierit�—The city will use the priorities outlined in Table 4B-12 to assess whether or not to request a MUSA expansion from the Metropolitan Council. Table 4B-12: MUSA Expansion Priorities Priority 1 Properties that abut the shoreline of Lake Minnetonka and all other Orono lakes Properties that abut City -protected tributaries, and all other properties within the Priority 2 Shoreland Overlay District Priority 3 Existing substandard developed lots not covered by Priorities 1 and 2 and developed prior to 1985 that have failing septic systems abd do not have an alternative site available to replace said system. Priority 4 New development using clustering that permanently preserves blocks of open space. Priority 5 Conforming developed lots not covered by Priorities 1 and 2 and developed prior to 1985 that have failing septic systems and do not have an alternative site available to replace said system. Priority 6 New or existing development not covered by priorities 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5. e�e�. .e:etiszesrs.�s!f�r�:es.. :ee!es:r.� Priority 4 City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4B, Page 19 CMP Part 4B. Sanitary Sewer Plan Conditions Expansion of the MUSA on the established prioritized basis noted above will occur only when one of the following conditions is found: When an area of existing homes has failing or non -conforming septic systems and replacement drain field sites are not available for a significant share of the existing homes. 2. When an individual home has a failing or non -conforming septic system, does not have an alternate drain field site, is adjacent to existing sewer lines, and is not part of a neighborhood that could be better served by a neighborhood sewer lateral project. 3. When a new or existing residential development meeting all required development standards is adjacent to existing sewer lines and the developer or homeowners agree to bear all costs of extending municipal sewer to the development, but only when inclusion of such development in the MUSA will not result in a decrease in the City's sewered density as calculated by the Metropolitan Council. Future Sanitary Sewer Improvements The City's focus on future sanitary sewer needs will be on a limited number of extensions to service new developments within the existing urban area/ MUSA and maintenance to include I&I mitigation of the existing system. Future Sewer Expansion Proiects Table 4B-13 below lists possible future sewer expansion projects. Table 4B-13: Proiects Improvement Projected Year of Triggering Completion Event Orono Preserve Development - Sewer main to serve 39 new homes 1 2018 Subdivision Shadywood Villas Development - Sewer main to serve 7 single family homes 2 2018 Subdivision Brackets Point Sewer Main replacement - Repflacement of existing gravity main with a 3 forcemain and lift station, away from the lake 2018 Subdivision City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4B, Page 20 CMP Part 4B. Sanitary Sewer Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4B, Page 21 4 CSAH 112 Sewer Main Extension - Extension of 2019 CSAH turnback sewer main west along CSAH 112 from Old Crystal bay Road to serve future developments planned on the south side of CSAH 112. 5 Wildhurst 1 2019 1 Subdivision Table 4B 13! Projeets Year o eefflplefioft Tfiggefing Event Or -ono Pr-esefve Development—Sewer--main to efve 39 NU Unde� ro stf 2 Shadywood Villas Development Sewer- Mai to s 7 single family homes. 241-9 Under Gonstfuetion -3 Bfaekets Point Sewer -Main Replaeemefit Rep'l^eenTent stab 2-OU4 Developmen 4 CSAH 112 Sewer- Main Extension Ex4€rsen of sewer to serve 1;,tufe developments planned o the south side of GS n u 112. 20W Appf!oved Pf Plat �9r Deyelopmer�� Sehed le ;s dependent o development liming, size and/or- 1.,..a4io,, City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4B, Page 21 CMP Part 4B. Sanitary Sewer Plan Future Sewer Maintenance Needs Orono is committed to maintaining and improving the existing sanitary sewer system. In addition to the normal routine and reactive maintenance operations the city is committed to the following proactive/ preventive maintenance programs: Table 413-14: Maintenance Program Description Purpose Annual Budget (2018$s) Annual sewer This project includes the cleaning and This project is part of the City $ 45,895 cleaning and inspection (televising) of 1/5 of the preventative maintenance program. inspections City's sewer mains each year. The results of the inspection are used to determine future maintenance needs and identify possible sources of I&I. Annual Lift All 44 Lift and Grinder stations with in The results of the inspection are used $7,000 Stations the city are inspected annually. to determine future maintenance Inspections needs. Sewer Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation projects Reduce Inflow and Infiltration (I&I) $ 265,225 Rehabilitation will consist of Cured in Place Pipe into the Sanitary sewer systems. The (CIDP) lining of infiltration susceptible lining process creates and new sanitary sewer pipes, manhole durable pipe within the older pipe at reconstruction, and lid replacement. a much reduced cost from open curing or directionally drilling. Lift Station This project will rehabilitate 2 of the Ensure the reliability of the city's lift $ 110,000 Rehabilitations City's 46 Lift Stations. Rehabilitation station system. Allows City to includes the inspection, and provide extensive maintenance to replacement of a lift stations piping, each Lift Station once every 22 years. motors, pumps and control as well as repairs wet well. Backup Generator This project will provide a backup This project is part of a systematic $ 150,000 Installation generators for 2 Lift Stations per year. effort to provide backup power to critical City infrastructure. Sewer System This project will see the provision of This is a continuation/ expansion of $ 26,000 Monitoring electronic monitoring of 4 additional the project begun in 2016. As of Lift Stations per year. This project will 2017 the city has 30/46 lift stations upgrade/replace components of the being electronically monitored. The monitoring system including antennas, provision of electronic monitoring cabling, and uninterruptable power for all of the city's lift stations will supply (UPS). improve response time to issues, reduce backup incidents and provide real time monitoring and reporting for accountability. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4B, Page 22 CMP Part 4B. Sanitary Sewer Plan City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4B, Page 23 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN Road Drake Dr Q n 0 Moline Road ow CL 1 26 Painter Road W Branch Road County Road 15' Sunnyfield Road E a 0 0 o: m Game Farm RaadE Dutch Lake Legend M 19N z o Jenning' Bay Harrison Bay : City Limits Lakes & Ponds .r 11 +t 2040 MUSA Rivers & Streams .i 0 3,500 Feet Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT FW LAf 12 MCES Sanitary Sewer Meter Service Areas November 2018 L L Sta w ° Moon Lake \._.. ....�.... ��...._.....—........_....... ._.... _...._....�..�f•.--.._ ,.—..—. .'L°.,_..�..r..�..�.�_., Trot 7 O w• S w w w w w w w w Q E • \ CL 1 o ,4rrwwrer, °ad sth-4 I At r Spring •Z�\ M PveN 1 v yu9arW0 w wl w•z O• -0... 0 Kelley po-V aQ� Long ♦r I o Z '� err-w.�..� L m M43 I �'► �,, �'� �1 1 760 '.M Daniels St 1 c 12, � w� 1 1 j Grand AvOrcharq �n [�;�•.�_ Oa<o 1- r r59 Lake tem! j +`I ^,� M430 �:.0�.r ' �O 11'1iii3J i+ Rio 1 e 1 �O r Irl m.�y� w� 1 w w w 1 ��'�l'�yl�"� m LL'1iiT`+ZJ w w w 1 c v r M435� w w w w w no t M42f9AA j '� 1♦ French Marsh — Ji N Shore Dr a 1212 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I! Wayzata Bay Min Highland Aver tledge4Road re Road Ave I�1 BOLT MENK Real People. Real Solutions. Ave N MCES Sanitary Sewer System PS Lift Station Mo.- Gravity Interceptor o Meter Forcemain Interceptor Map 413-1 Z c J PI R � 1 � 1r � r �° O♦ C., rl w Iw wl �1 o i 2 Lift PS Ps "k• III 1 ■.w.r�.r�.r�! Qtl FS 0 �� PS M422 5� r <yric A Ave I � 9 � L Sprin j P, 1 o +`I ^,� M430 �:.0�.r ' �O 11'1iii3J i+ Rio 1 e 1 �O r Irl m.�y� w� 1 w w w 1 ��'�l'�yl�"� m LL'1iiT`+ZJ w w w 1 c v r M435� w w w w w no t M42f9AA j '� 1♦ French Marsh — Ji N Shore Dr a 1212 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I! Wayzata Bay Min Highland Aver tledge4Road re Road Ave I�1 BOLT MENK Real People. Real Solutions. Ave N MCES Sanitary Sewer System PS Lift Station Mo.- Gravity Interceptor o Meter Forcemain Interceptor Map 413-1 Z c J PI a 0 0 cc 2 m GameFarm A 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN Road Drake Dr Q n 0 Moline Road 0. 1 26 - Painter Road W Branch Road County Road 15' Sunnyfield Road E Legend E Dutch Lake 19N 1t- - - `�l cJenning'° Bay ps Harrison Bay •r : City Limits Lakes & Ponds 11 +t 2040 MUSA Rivers & Streams .i 0 3,500 Feet Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT :1C MCES Sanitary Sewer Meter Service Areas --•—, November 2018 • Sta o r r Moon Laken Z --- r ♦ E 6 CL ' o ♦ s „ r w w Y' w, Road thg110 1 M � �► +, I Spring � PveN 1 o pgar o Y M 1 .Z v o - , o � �ryy� Kelle Y aQ� �► `i o as l�'JU11:15�j Z Y �P_k i� •w �� .Y�� ♦ ; �' R �o Q� -0 cp M4 I I '► � p � ••• � � � 0 '..� Daniels St 1 I P ty � � /-''i wro ^ 1 i LL Grand Averchard �n (�q 1 1 9' Lakah" Y 1 e ♦ 1�� � Ri dy N s Y w i Y w�-•'�'�r.1 1 A430 �, \-x\w�.•w ♦ 1 poi 0 �■ �o " 1 _ • d Z' O w TY r 1 �a a Yrww YUi wYYYY� _ C 1 , _ 1♦ I- F, akE French l� 1i J Y � 1 M4354 N Shore Dr �12 Ia' 1 � 1 i i Bracketts ; Point 1 1 1 1 1 I! ;K Wayzata Bay Min re Ave E I�1 BOLT MENK Real People. Real Solutions. MCES Sanitary Sewer System PS Lift Station o Meter Map 413-1 Ave N Gravity Interceptor Forcemain Interceptor Z c J PI rn Jo �c _7._1 � w w �o �1 o i 1 Lift Fs Fs "k•11 1 11 � .— ■.w.w�.w�.w�! Fs MA Qtl 16 RM P' 5� IPS , ;J <yricAve � � 9 L Springy j P, o _ • d Z' O w TY r 1 �a a Yrww YUi wYYYY� _ C 1 , _ 1♦ I- F, akE French l� 1i J Y � 1 M4354 N Shore Dr �12 Ia' 1 � 1 i i Bracketts ; Point 1 1 1 1 1 I! ;K Wayzata Bay Min re Ave E I�1 BOLT MENK Real People. Real Solutions. MCES Sanitary Sewer System PS Lift Station o Meter Map 413-1 Ave N Gravity Interceptor Forcemain Interceptor Z c J PI 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN N Arm or Jenning's Bay Harrison Bay Legend �'.. City Limits � w -A 111 2040 MUSA Y+ ria t����� �• -R ,ke A Sta ( o o Moot Y „a in) �6twe Q Y Y Y w I z , �`°� � E •I ( I • Lake Ctassen] i' °'Ysicre 1 � '■ � � 1 ,osy cc �0 1 � •. 1 IC .►41 rFl 1 JI 4 �'►JAW Y North Arm Maxw4� ' L Bay 1 Lake 1 � r �1 West Arm 1 1 � •wy FY ��•wr■.w�.w.w! 1 Crysiai Ba, °oa ' �Q it w e Spring 3 Y w 0 1 Lydiard z � m m Lake �M Kelley pkr�Y s �� tY �� ��a'� T ® 1M �MDanielsst pp 12 Orchard(�.n / h.1 4orIw ■Y iLL Grand iv H Ave %c 1 J � i � ' '•� ` � Oho ti dlip. Ri ■r•Y� -111`\�..Wayzata'rglvdUV � w I �w yf 12 O / O 1 ' FOX SY Y Y ♦ AM, �w,Y. C t t%om, O r1001 ,+, 1 Bohn �•4+ w w w1 1 1• � 1 1 1 � Lafayette 1 ♦• Bay .fit Lakes & Ponds Rivers & Streams 0 3,500 e Feet Source. Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT Cas !!' pnir 1 1 w y■. 101 MUSA Expansion November 2018 MUSA Expansion History QBOLT MENK Real People. Real Solutions. N MUSA Part Addition Name Lift StationService Area CMP Amendment /[Yate O - 1 .0_.12 Of � #1135 c LR 1 B/C, B-1 to 5 1,285 - 2 0 LS -60 �, 4/14/1980 RR 1B, 1 64 - 3 Hackberry winter Crer #1135 4/14/1980 � a 17 0 Oa Wayz °c e�Q- R -1A 7 M 5 Moline Road c #1135 4/14/1980 o. 47 - 6 Nttka Bluffs / Orono La / W Ferndale 19N N Arm or Jenning's Bay Harrison Bay Legend �'.. City Limits � w -A 111 2040 MUSA Y+ ria t����� �• -R ,ke A Sta ( o o Moot Y „a in) �6twe Q Y Y Y w I z , �`°� � E •I ( I • Lake Ctassen] i' °'Ysicre 1 � '■ � � 1 ,osy cc �0 1 � •. 1 IC .►41 rFl 1 JI 4 �'►JAW Y North Arm Maxw4� ' L Bay 1 Lake 1 � r �1 West Arm 1 1 � •wy FY ��•wr■.w�.w.w! 1 Crysiai Ba, °oa ' �Q it w e Spring 3 Y w 0 1 Lydiard z � m m Lake �M Kelley pkr�Y s �� tY �� ��a'� T ® 1M �MDanielsst pp 12 Orchard(�.n / h.1 4orIw ■Y iLL Grand iv H Ave %c 1 J � i � ' '•� ` � Oho ti dlip. Ri ■r•Y� -111`\�..Wayzata'rglvdUV � w I �w yf 12 O / O 1 ' FOX SY Y Y ♦ AM, �w,Y. C t t%om, O r1001 ,+, 1 Bohn �•4+ w w w1 1 1• � 1 1 1 � Lafayette 1 ♦• Bay .fit Lakes & Ponds Rivers & Streams 0 3,500 e Feet Source. Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT Cas !!' pnir 1 1 w y■. 101 MUSA Expansion November 2018 MUSA Expansion History QBOLT MENK Real People. Real Solutions. N MUSA Part Addition Name Lift StationService Area CMP Amendment /[Yate Zoning District Acres - 1 Navarre / Forest Lake / Tonkaw a LS -59 #1135 4/14/1980 LR 1 B/C, B-1 to 5 1,285 - 2 Orono Schools & Industrial park LS -60 #1135 4/14/1980 RR 1B, 1 64 - 3 Hackberry LS -60 #1135 4/14/1980 R-113 17 ■d 4 Herrick Circle Wayz #1135 4/14/1980 R -1A 7 M 5 Chevy Chase Ferndale Green Wayz #1135 4/14/1980 R -1A 47 - 6 Nttka Bluffs / Orono La / W Ferndale DSI #1337 11/23/1981 LR -1A, RRA B 87 - 7 County Road 15 Marinas DSI #1337 11/23/1981 LR -1A, B-2 4 - 8 Crystal Bay DSI #2131 2/23/1987 LR -1A, RR -113 44 9 Fulmer Property" LS -60 #2131 2/23/1987 RR 1B 3 - 10 Hwy 12 Corridor West LS -60 #2437 5/23/1988 Various 242 - 11 Hwy 12 Corridor Fast Wayz #2437 5/23/1988 RR 1B 10 - 12 North Shore / Scotch Pine LS -59 #3283 5/24/1993 LR -1A 119 0 13 650 Brow In Rd. N. LS -60 #3283 5/24/1993 LR -1A 3 - 14 Fairway Hills Addition Wayz #3283 5/24/1993 RR -1B 5 - 15 Long Lake/ Fleming Trail * #3283 5/24/1993 24 - 16 Stubbs Bay LS -59 #3153 8/10/1992 LR -1A, RR -113 179 17 Oono Sewer Rant Property LS -59 #3348 10/25/1993 RRAB 4 - 18 Nettles Property DSI #3348 10/25/1993 LR -1A 4 . 19 North Long Lake LS -60 #3791 10/28/1996 LR -1A 22 20 Long Lake Country Club LS -60 #3791 10/28/1996 LR -1A 23 21 East Long Lake LS -60 #3791 10/28/1996 LR -1A, RR -113 20 22 Orono Orchards DSI #3791 10/28/1996 RR -1B 40 - 23 Fox Ridge LS -60 #3791 10/28/1996 RR -1B 16 - 24 Weber hills DSI #3791 10/28/1996 RR -1B 48 - 25 Edgewood Hills DSI #3791 10/28/1996 RR 1B 20 - 26 Bracketts Point DSI #3791 10/28/1996 LR -1A 34 . 27 Foxhill DSI #3791 10/28/1996 LR -1A 43 - 28 Bayridge / Hartw ood DSI #3791 10/28/1996 LR -1A 28 M 29 Orono Schools Hockey Arena LS -60 #3791 10/28/1996 RR 1B 75 - 30 Dillman Property LS -60 #3791 10/28/1996 RR 1B 3 - 31 Maw ell Bay Area LS -59 #4195 10/9/1998 LR -1A 165 - 32 Dumas Orchard LS -60 #4723 11/13/2001 RRA B I RRJD 70 33 Lake Classen NE LS -60 #4723 11/14/2001 RR -1B 49 M 34 East Hackberry LS -60 #4723 11/15/2001 RR 1B / RPUD 29 1 35 Van Eeckhout (Creekside) LS -60 #4723 11/16/2001 RR 1B PRD 31 36 Bluffs Extensions HarmrGoetten DSI #4723 11/17/2001 RR -1B 23 - 37 Tanager Lake DSI #4723 11/18/2001 LR -1A 82 - 38 Murphy North Shore DSI #4723 11/19/2001 LR -1A 79 . 39 Dickey Lake Shoreland LS -60 #4723 11/20/2001 RR -1B 145 40 Long Lake Shoreland LS -60 #4723 11/21/2001 LR -1A 218 - 41 St. Edwards Church Rym #4723 11/22/2001 RR 1B 4 - 42 French Lake Shoreland LS -59 #4723 11/23/2001 RR 1B 362 - 43 Old Long Lake Road Wayz #5063 10/27/2003 RR -1B 19 - 45 Wrtlewood Road Wayz #5673 10/8/2007 RR -1B 30 - 46 5 & 15 Brow In Road South LS -60 #5959 9/13/2010 RR 1 B 4 - 47 465 & 525 Leaf Street LS -59 #5959 9/13/2010 RR 1 B 7 - 48 3060 Fox Street LS -59 #5959 9/13/2010 RR -113 1 - 49 850 Wayzata Boulevard Wayz #5959 9/13/2010 RR 1B 6 50 3245 Wayzata Boulevard LS -60 #5959 9/13/2010 RR 1B 29 Proposed: 51 11003 Wildhurst Trail LS -17 RR 1B 10 * Demolished for Highway 12 right-of-way "Annexed to City of Long Lake DSI = Downstream Interceptor Ln Map 4B-2 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN a, Turner Road s 0 0 Drake Dr 26 - 0 N Painter N I —E W Branch Road � I0 l Sunnyfield Road E J r 'o �I 0 T R T m / ( �° Game Farm Boa Cye/ ` o' Dutch X Lake Legend Moline Road m J a 19N ? V a z Boa a � T d m !A y A� � Town Road Existing Wastewater System November 2018 r�{ L \ L / Q <o L Moon Tro,G L E [ •1 Dich 0' Lake �; LakF it ; t Sprin Classes o-� _ � ` _,F _ g ; Z` o Lydiaro Lake o �! Kelle Y ' oncr -� ;—y `Pkv �ti a , .,�" _'-. • ` �. � m C H-- , 12 Daniels St ! E v �_ef A Ad AvOrchard Ln �. ♦ O�01 .. - -I Z> v O .� . .� _ 1 R, 0 0- ' ' -�" ms's ..�'�.e �,ti�a. •'L � .. �t ��`. Wayzata Blvd Vlr • iw0 de Rod _ , , N,, c I[ - 12 - r J M 1 � Stubb<; � Bay i Fox $t M. 1 nr O County Road 151 W ) a P v R P c North � Browns P_e��, 0 Tana P o Arrn a i n ,�♦♦ _ ...� `i Maxi„, � Laky Y4�` ♦' 1 an BayFrenchForest PC ” Marsh ; Shore Dr ; Jenning-`-; I ` PB n Bay r, �� .- '. Ps c I • ` 3 - /� i , Smit: , .c �♦ ! •► � v Vest � �- w �•♦ ' � 1 n '♦ � �'♦ -a , •�••• Harrison ,' - .. ♦.�•• • �' Bay • r : City Limits Lakes & Ponds _.._.._.._. or apt'---•+;' „':I 1 : 77� Lafayette 1 -- YricAJe\ -;•r- - Bay �' 1 i4 ,tee T I, . ; ;%fir--' � ' . � . �•. Sprinc Park • �1 Bay ► ♦• 2040 MUSA Rivers & Streams e 0 3,500 •. ' � ',,., - Feet nc� 'Casco • Doint 1 Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT " —' • — / �_ , Ave L4� / "r F .1 alta Blvd E rn Lake -S-,,,, -. s 'a m Y` Vo +a ca Wayzata Bay Min Sanitary Sewer System BOLTN / & MENK Real People. Real Solutions. Ave N ELI Sanitary Lift Sanitary Station Forcemain - Sanitary Pipe MCES Interceptor Map 413-3 Z c J 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN M co rn Turner Road 'a 'o o y T I Drake Dr O 3 � O o v U Cfe et Q IM 0 Moline Road 0. a �"19N Existing Wastewater System Katrina l o 12 Cake Moot � � Y � d m3 z ►- 6t _° c P6 �- goad q�e H 1 ' ,� Spring Z 1 p ♦ m O ID oniels St. 1 d GG d md v Orchar O/o, a y v Grand Ave �n - �OWn O. a %g lake o ROay w �� leo� ♦ �o 1� s �q �, r W 8y o' 't'. aYzata B _ 1vd W 12 - ,s d a PainterRoad) i ' Fox St P6 ®♦ P6 } PS I SII L • 'i/ Q W Branch Road County Road 151 W P6 P6 L) c >-♦ f v P_e��m �O ` . O `P6 ♦ ``' P6 ♦ ' Ps 1A P6 y, Sunnyfield Road E , /Nk ! ghor P6 cDenning'_ I _ - 2 y \`�_ -� 1 Bay Game Farm RoadE • �� ,1 _� ��� 1 a Dutch An 4E� 1 I •� Lake > 1 '• •�••`••`• ' m Harrison Bay 1 1 Lynwood Blvd • • — • • .. t V Shoreline Or ��- r .. _ Lafayette _+ ♦- yric Ave •t � Ba ♦. P6 6 �A � � ♦ � P Legend e ♦!y , -, .• ,�' sae 'r .• � i •r : City Limits Lakes & Ponds Sprinr ► P BC � s 2040 MUSA Rivers & Streams ' ; �;%W:.,. ; 000 0 3,500 ems' Feet ' � • co • Point 1 Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, •. Hennepin County, MnDOT �'' —" —'• — / �_ er�'N �1 November 2018 Ave Wayzata Bay E I�1 BOLT MENK Real People. Real Solutions. Ave N z c J Minnetonka Blvd 1 II o �w + Highland Ave �y S Rutledge Road v 4SSex kzure Road a bay PIS Sanitary Sewer System LEI Sanitary Lift Sanitary Station Forcemain — - Sanitary Pipe Map 413-3 MCES Interceptor 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN M Katrina °° Turner Road 12� Lake .� O _ O Drake Dr C C 3 0 . 0 1 V 0,eK • 1 `O PveN a Q O I Q-oaa Moline Road m CL 26 19N Legend e •r City Limits Lakes & Ponds 1, +t 2040 MUSA Rivers & Streams .i 0 3,500 Feet Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT ■.w.w�.w�.w�! tl F Existing Wastewater Disposal Facilities L L Q P <, L Moor z Y d •fit .. �. c Lake www w wQ wwww irr�, r E ' 1 Z ♦ stb Dic c w , ® �tOad 4110 Lake + a 3 + espripg 1 g Classen Z " w l w• Z 10 o: _Kelley Pk!t?Y �.� r ; T y 12 Daniels St �� - 1 _ c LL Grand A ,orcFiardi�n ��` _ d a< i� 1 1 1 � � o a d58 Lak0 wr+f 1+■ tee;► ,e' �` •; y 0111 .. _.. ws . J �"R `r 1 O 9 1WaYZ tam w l ♦ 1 . — .. • a Blvd W �90 y I www l 4t 12 • l a I Stubbs Bay _ _ co 11 Fox St m dk- ai w O �! 1 ' 0 Maxwen_ Bay �-� ,) French Marsh 10,5hore 0 — r Crystal Bay i <yric Ave Sprinr j P, Ca. w w , 1 0 • w rwi ♦ Browns a yei Bay ake i 111111111111116� 1 l 1 i \ 1 . IL -r Smith Bracketts Point Bohr Poin. ♦ '�•♦ 1 i 1 s � Lafayette w. w.w• w.w•, Bay t `�- 'w �.w�.wi•w�•w �o November 2018 Wayzata Bay Ave E J I�1 BOLT MENK Real People. Real Solutions. Ave N N. Minnetonka Blvd 1 a yw O d Highland Ave s utledge Road y Lire Road a Day PI' Existing Wastewater Disposal Facilities Individual Sewage Treatment System Map 413-4 W Branch Road !i �- roll Sunnyfield Road Game 0, 011 Dutch Lake,n - - Imo` .�. Legend e •r City Limits Lakes & Ponds 1, +t 2040 MUSA Rivers & Streams .i 0 3,500 Feet Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT ■.w.w�.w�.w�! tl F Existing Wastewater Disposal Facilities L L Q P <, L Moor z Y d •fit .. �. c Lake www w wQ wwww irr�, r E ' 1 Z ♦ stb Dic c w , ® �tOad 4110 Lake + a 3 + espripg 1 g Classen Z " w l w• Z 10 o: _Kelley Pk!t?Y �.� r ; T y 12 Daniels St �� - 1 _ c LL Grand A ,orcFiardi�n ��` _ d a< i� 1 1 1 � � o a d58 Lak0 wr+f 1+■ tee;► ,e' �` •; y 0111 .. _.. ws . J �"R `r 1 O 9 1WaYZ tam w l ♦ 1 . — .. • a Blvd W �90 y I www l 4t 12 • l a I Stubbs Bay _ _ co 11 Fox St m dk- ai w O �! 1 ' 0 Maxwen_ Bay �-� ,) French Marsh 10,5hore 0 — r Crystal Bay i <yric Ave Sprinr j P, Ca. w w , 1 0 • w rwi ♦ Browns a yei Bay ake i 111111111111116� 1 l 1 i \ 1 . IL -r Smith Bracketts Point Bohr Poin. ♦ '�•♦ 1 i 1 s � Lafayette w. w.w• w.w•, Bay t `�- 'w �.w�.wi•w�•w �o November 2018 Wayzata Bay Ave E J I�1 BOLT MENK Real People. Real Solutions. Ave N N. Minnetonka Blvd 1 a yw O d Highland Ave s utledge Road y Lire Road a Day PI' Existing Wastewater Disposal Facilities Individual Sewage Treatment System Map 413-4 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply TABLE OF CONTENTS CMP PART 4C WATER SUPPLY Introduction 4C-2 Existing Facilities 4C-2 Table 4C-1 Well Construction Summary 4C-2 Table 4C-2 Existing Storage Facilities 4C-3 Table 4C-3 Met Council Projections 4C-4 Table 4C-4 Historic Water Use 4C-5 Table 4C-5 Projected Water Demand - Navarre 4C-6 Table 4C-6 Projected Water Demand — Highway 12 4C-6 Water System Evaluation 4C-8 Table 4C-7 Projected Water Supply - Navarre 4C-8 Table 4C-8 Projected Water Supply — Highway 12 4C-8 Table 4C-9 Required Storage - Navarre 4C-10 Table 4C-10 Required Storage — Highway 12 4C-10 Table 4C-11 Required Storage based on High Day - Navarre 4C-11 Table 4C-12 Required Storage based on High Day - Navarre 4C-12 Table 4C-13 Recommended Fire Flows 4C-14 Proposed Water System Improvements 4C-16 WaterSystem Emergency Preparedness 4C-17 Table 4C-14 Additional Water Resources 4C-19 Conservation Plan 4C-23 Goals and Policies 4C-26 Table 4C-15 Future Expansion Projects 4C-28 Table 4C-16 Future Sewer Maintenance Needed 4C-29 Appendix 1. Maps Appendix 4C -A2. MnDNR Local Water Supply Template Submission City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 1 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply INTRODUCTION The City of Orono is required to update its water supply plan and submit to the DNR and the Metropolitan Council as part of the Comprehensive Plan update required of all metro area cities. This Chapter is intended to address that requirement. EXISTING FACILITIES General This motion Chapter provides a summary of the existing water supply, treatment, storage, and distribution facilities for the City of Orono. The City has four existing water systems: the Navarre Water System, the Highway 12 Water System, the Wayzata System Extension, and the Long Lake System Extension. The Navarre Water System is located in the southern portion of Orono. It consists of two municipal wells, a treatment facility, one elevated storage tank, and a water distribution system. The Highway 12 Water System is located in the northern portion of the City. It consists of two municipal wells, a small treatment facility including a chemical feed system, one elevated storage tank, and a water distribution system. The Wayzata System Edon is located in the northeast portion of Orono. It consists of a distribution system that has its water supplied from the City of Wayzata. The Long Lake System Extension is a distribution system that has its water supplied from the City of Long Lake. More than 50 percent of the households in Orono receive their potable water from private individual wells. The distribution systems are comprised of watermains ranging in size from 6 to 16 inches in diameter. The existing water service area is shown in Table 4C—Map 4C-1. Water Supply The City's water is currently provided by four existing water systems. The Navarre Water System is supplied by two wells, Well 1 and 2. The Highway 12 Water System is supplied by two wells, Wells 3 and 4. A summary of the specific well construction information is provided in Table 4C-1. Table 4C-1 Well Construction summary Navarre Navarre Well 1 Well 2 Highway 12 3 ell Highway 12 Well 4 Unique Well No. 205_,627 211,965 509,097 821,940 Year Constructed 1971 1971 1991 2017 Well Pump Capacity (gpm) 1,000 500 500 1,000 Casing Diameter (inches) 12 8 16 18 Casing Depth (feet) NA NA NA 365 Overall Well Depth (feet) 385 390 381 1 500 Total Well Capacity 1.8 MGD 1.6 MGD Firm Capacity 0.6 MGD 0.6 MGD City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 2 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply The total well capacity is determined as the total capacity of all wells operating for 20 hours per day. It is considered good practice to allow the well pumps a few hours of down time to "rest", which ultimately extends the life of the pumps and allows for aquifer recharge. The firm capacity is the total capacity with the single largest pump out of service and is determined for a pumping period of 20 hours per day. Regulatory agencies recommend the firm capacity be equal to or greater than the average day demand it serves. Water Treatment Treatment of source water for the Navarre Water System consists of sand filtration for iron and manganese removal, ion exchange softening to reduce hardness, and chemical addition prior to entry into the distribution system. Fluoride is added for dental cavity protection, chlorine is added for disinfection, and polyphosphate is added as a corrosion inhibitor. Treatment of source water for the Highway 12 system consists of chemical addition of chlorine and fluoridei-,end polyphosphate is added as a corrosion inhibitor. Water Storage The existing storage facilities in the City of Orono consist of one 200,000 -gallon elevated water tower in the Navarre Water System and one 400,000 -gallon elevated water tower in the Highway 12 Water System. Details of the water storage tower are presented in Table 4C-2. Table 4C-2: Existing Storage Facilities 11 Navarre Highway 12 Water Water Tower Tower Capacity (gallons) 200,000 400,000 Year Constructed 1971 1993 High Water Level 1,102 1,165 Support Type Multi- legged Hydropillar Water Distribution System The Orono water system is comprised of water mains ranging in size from 6 inches to 16 inches in diameter. As previously discussed, both the Navarre and Highway 12 service areas include groundwater wells and elevated storage. The Wayzata System Extension and Long Lake System Extension are supplied with water directly from the other two Cities' water systems and only provide a means of distribution to the customers. The existing capacities of the systems appear to be adequate in regards to pressure and available fire flow. Future improvements to provide service to planned expansion areas as well as increased supply capacities are discussed later in this report. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 3 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply Mains that are 10 inches and larger are considered trunk mains for this size of distribution system. When possible, all mains should be built in loops. A dead end main without enough connected demand will require frequent flushing to reduce water stagnation problems. This problem is especially true for trunk mains because of the larger volume of water stored. The existing system has several dead end pipe segments in cul-de-sacs and other areas that limit looping. Looping of water mains also helps provide for uninterrupted service to most of the system customers when one pipe segment is shut down for repairs. With a looped system only an isolated section of the system will be out of service instead of an entire neighborhood or commercial area. Looping also provides for substantial flow increases during a fire demand as the demand at the location of the fire can be met from more than one direction in the system. The - water- d on system is shown in Table 4G LAND USE AND POPULATION Land Use The water system planning area is based on providing service within the current City limits. Population Projection The Metropolitan Council's "Thrive" forecasts are presented in Table 4C-3. The Metropolitan Council projects the City of Orono's population to approach 9,8W000 in 2030. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 4 Table 4C-3: Orono Population and Households 1970 - 2040 (Sewered and Unsewered Forecasts) Population Year 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2016 2020 2030 2040 Sewered -- -- -- -- 4,429 -- 5,150 6,170 6,740 Unsewered -- -- -- -- 3,008 -- 2,950 2,630 2,760 Total City 6,787 6,845 7,285 7,538 7,437 7,691 8,100 8,800 9,500 Household Year 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2016 2020 2030 2040 Sewered -- -- -- -- 1,780 2,105 2,455 2,785 2,253 Unsewered -- -- -- -- 1046 784 1,095 1,105 1,115 Total City 2,146 2,291 2,613 2,766 3,037 3,200 3,560 3,900 Persons/HH 3.16 2.99 2.79 2.73 L2,826 2.63 2.53 2.53 2.47 2.44 Source: Metropolitan Council System Statement City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 4 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply As previously noted, approximately one-half of the existing population is served by private wells. A portion of the projected population growth will be served by the Orono water system. This increase in population served is likely the growth that will occur within and adjacent to the Highway 12 water system. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 5 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply WATER USAGE Existing Water Usage Historical water data is an important tool for determining trends and helping to assist the City in determining if there are problems within the system. Yearly and monthly pumping summaries from 2005 to 2015 are presented below in Table 4C-4-1 for the Water System. The yearly pumping totals reveal a slight decrease in recent water usage. Table 4C-4: Historic Water Demand Average Year 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2010-2015 Pop. Served 2260 2305 2350 2380 2410 2440 2470 2500 2970 2970 2970 2720 Total Connections 879 882 876 905 945 965 997 1006 1001 1002 1008 997 Res. Water Delivered (MG) 62.44 78.56 69.3 72.6 72.11 69.94 72.53 78.67 75.07 67.1 65.27 71.43 C/I/I Water Delivered (MG) 22.69 21.28 18.34 8.58 26.07 21.46 26.55 32.27 17.93 16.7 16.87 21.96 Other Water Delivered (MG) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4.38 3.36 3.86 1.57 2.2 Wholesale Deliveries (MG) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.61 0.6 0.67 0.31 Total Water Delivered (MG) 85.13 99.84 87.64 81.18 98.18 91.4 99.08 115.32 96.97 88.26 84.38 95.9 Total Water Pumped (MG) 99.78 123.64 131.61 112.51 129.28 107.83 116.32 125.01 108.49 96.07 374.15 154.65 Water Supplier Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.71 2.85 275 47.26 Percent unmetered/ unaccounted 14.68% 19.25% 33.41% 27.85% 24.06% 15.24% 14.82% 7.75% 5.35% 5.16% 3.95% 8.71% Average Daily Demand (MGD) 0.27 0.34 0.36 0.31 0.35 0.3 0.32 0.34 0.3 0.26 1.03 0.42 Max Daily Demand (MGD) 1.11 1.08 1.16 1.43 0.91 0.79 0.77 0.89 0.74 0.8 10.33 2.39 Date of Max Demand 7/10/2012 8/26/2013 8/27/2014 4/21/2015 Res. Per Capita Demand (GPCD) 75.7 93.4 80.8 83.6 82 78.5 80.4 86.2 69.2 61.9 60.2 72.8 Total per Capita Demand (GPCD) 121 1 147 153.4 1 129.5 147 121.1 1 129 137 1 100.1 88.6 345.1 153.5 MG - Million Gallons MGD - Million Gallons per Day GPCD - Gallons per Capita per Day Unaccounted for water was above X25 percent in 2009 2007 and 20089. Since theff2013, the unaccounted for water has been vefy good a elow 49-6 percent. Determining unaccounted for water is an important tool. The City monitors this parameter on a quarterly basis as well as conducting water audits and annual leak detection. Reducing the amount City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 6 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply of unaccounted for water will conserve the amount of water pumped as well as preserve the life expectancy of the well pumps, and reduce waste. Water Demand Proiections Water demand projections have been estimated with respect to the construction of new homes. For simplicity reasons, new industrial/commercial demands have been calculated by the available acreage for development. The population projections shown below indicate what the various water demands would be should the population increase to that value. The populations shown is only for planning purposes and it should not be presumed that this growth will occur. The proposed expansion areas of the distribution system are shown in Figuf 1 44 Map 4C-2. From historical data previously presented, the average per capita daily water usage for the Navarre Water System has been selected as 100al�per capita per day ( cpd) with a peaking factor of 2.0. The total average demand per capita for the Highway 12 Water System has been selected as 150 gpcpd with a peaking factor of 2.0. Sinee tThe population in the Highway 12 system is so small the commercial water use skews population based projections, therefore a 0.10 mgpd constant has been added. The selected water use values were then used with population projections to project future water demands which are presented in Tables 4C-5 and Table 4C-6. Table 4C-5: Projected Water Demand - Navarre Service Area Population Average Daily Maximum Daily Demand (MGD)1 Demand(MGD)2 2,200 (2018) 0.233 0.466 2,300 0.23 0.46 2,400 0.24 0.48 2,500 0.25 0.5 2,600 0.26 0.52 2,700 0.27 0.54 2,800 0.28 0.56 2,900 0.29 0.58 3,000 0.3 0.6 Used an average day usage of 100 gpcpd z Used a peaking factor of 2.0 TABLE 4C-6: Projected Water Demand - Highway 12 Service Area Population Average Daily Demand (MGD)1 Maximum Daily Demand (MGD)2 400 (2018) 0.16 0.32 600 0.19 0.38 800 0.22 0.44 1,000 0.25 0.5 1,200 0.28 0.56 1,400 0.31 0.62 1,600 10.34 0.68 1,800 0.37 0.74 2,000 0.40 0.80 Used an average day usage of 150 gpcpd, and 100K GPD of comcercial use Use a p eaking factor of 2.0 City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 7 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 8 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply WATER SYSTEM E " L UA TION General This section provides an evaluation summary of the existing water supply, treatment, storage, and distribution systems for the City of Orono. The existing system consists of four water supply systems. These four systems consist of four supply wells, two elevated storage tanks, two water treatment facilities, and four distribution systems. The existing water infrastructure components have been evaluated in terms of current and future demands. Water Supply Wells General 0 N MMM:rer�s:� . rte. s�:ee�Ea*esrsssssr _ . rr�e!f Well Capacity The Recommended Standards for Water Works (Ten State Standards) recommends that the average day demand be met by the firm capacity. Firm capacity is the pumping capacity with the largest well out of service. In addition, the daily well output is calculated based on operating for 20 hours per day to allow 4 hours per day of aquifer recharge. Using these standards, the Navarre Water System has a total capacity of 1.80 MGD and a firm capacity of 0.60 MGD. The Highway 12 Water System has a total capacity of 1.60 MGD and a firm capacity of 0.6 MGD. Table 4C-1 earlier in this chapter summarizes well capacity. Table 4C-7 and Table 4C-8 present the number of wells that will be needed to meet future demand projections for the Navarre and Highway 12 systems. The p-rejeeted demands, both aver -age and peak day usage, are listed in Table 4 C 7 and Table 4 C 8. As shown in T-abl€-4C-7-,-nNo additional wells are required for either system as both have adequate well capacity to meet future demands.— City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 9 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply Table 4C-7: Projected Water Supply - Navarre Average Maximum No. of New Firm Total Service Area Day Day Demand Wells Capacity Capacity Population Demand (MGD) Required (MGD) (MGD) (MGD) No. of New Wells Required 2,200 2018 0.22 0.44 0 0.6 1.8 2,300 0.23 0.46 0 0.6 1.8 2,400 0.24 0.48 0 0.6 1.8 2,500 0.25 0.50 0 0.6 1.8 2,600 0.26 0.52 0 0.6 1.8 2,700 0.27 0.54 0 0.6 1.8 2,800 0.28 0.56 0 0.6 1.8 2,900 0.29 0.58 0 0.6 1.8 3,000 0.30 0.60 0 0.6 1.8 TABLE 4C-8 Projected Water Su ply - Highway 12 Service Area Population Average Day Demand (MGD) Maximum Day Demand (MGD) No. of New Wells Required Firm Capacity (MGD) Total Capacity (MGD) 400(am) 0.16 0.32 0 0.6 1.6 600 0.19 0.38 0 0.6 1.6 800 0.22 0.44 0 0.6 1.6 11000 0.25 0.50 0 0.6 1.6 1,200 0.28 0.56 0 0.6 1.6 11400 0.31 0.62 0 0.6 1.6 1,600 0.34 0.68 0 0.6 1.6 1,800 0.37 0.74 0 0.6 1.6 2,000 0.40 0.80 0 0.6 1.6 Well Head Protection Well head protection should be given consideration when evaluating new well locations. Wellhead protection is a method of preventing contamination of public water supplies by managing potential contaminant sources in the area that contribute to a public water supply well. Land uses relative to commercial, industrial, and underground storage of chemicals and petroleum are considered higher risks to ground water protection than permanent open spaces, parks, farmland and low-density residential lots. All public water suppliers are required to implement wellhead protection measures. The Minnesota Department of Health City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 10 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply (MDH) was granted authority to implement wellhead protection and rules governing wellhead protection were adopted in March 2007. Grouping of wells eases wellhead protection and potential treatment beyond the existing facilities. Water Treatment to the water be f ro entry into the distr-,bubo system. At this time, the City does not need to pursue additional water treatment capacity at the Navarre WTP. However, the City should make chemical feed and other improvements at the Navarre WTP as outlined in Section 6 in the Water Supply Plan, 2018. The Highway 12 Wa4e,. Syste,,., adds ,.h lar-ifle distribution system. Water Storage r!rreraeer. ... .. mss• .. . �.i.T.i.T.T.r.��re:�rrersr_.: .0-0000 gallon elevated watef tlewef in. the H.4801— 111) systetn. Details of the storage tanks are presented in Table 4C-2. The principal purpose of storage is to provide the ability to equalize pumping rates during periods of variable rate demand. Adequate storage permits a reduction in the size of the pumps required to supply a community because peak demands are diminished by the reserve provided in storage. Storage is typically provided in elevated tanks for communities the size of Orono to provide storage and a pressure source even when the wells are not pumping. The primary reasons for providing storage are as follows: ■ To equalize pressure in the distribution system. ■ For emergency requirements (pump failure, power failure). ■ Fire protection. Storage adequacy can be assessed using the Average Day Criteria or the Maximum Day, Fire Protection and Emergency Storage Criteria. Average Day Criteria Generally, the minimum recommended standard, without fire protection, is equal to the average day demand (Ten State Standards, 1997). By this standard, the Navarre Water System currently has a slight storage deficit since the average day demand is 220,000 gpd and the current storage capacity is 20,000 gallons. As shown in Table 4C-9, the Navarre Water System will have a storage deficit of 100,000 gallons when the population using the system reaches 3,000. 3000 population equates to about 335 new households. 100% build out of the planned development areas in the Navarre area identifies 250 new households. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 11 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply As shown in Table 4C-10, the Highway 12 Water System will have adequate storage until the population exceeds 2000 and the average day demand rises above 400,000 gpd. TABLE 4C-9 Required Storage - Navarre Service Area Population Avg. Day (GPD) Existing Storage (gallons) Storage Deficit 2200 220,000 200,000 20,000 2,300 230,000 200,000 30,000 2,400 240,000 200,000 40,000 2,500 250,000 200,000 50,000 2,600 260,000 200,000 60,000 2,700 270,000 200,000 70,000 2,800 280,000 200,000 80,000 2,900 290,000 200,000 90,000 3,000 300,000 200,000 100,000 TABLE 4C-10: Required Storage - Highway 12 Service Area Population Avg. Day (GPD) Existing Storage allons) Storage Deficit 400 160,000 400,000 None 600 190,000 400,000 None 800 220,000 400,000 None 1,000 250,000 400,000 None 1,200 280,000 400,000 None 1,400 310,000 400,000 None 1,600 340,000 400,000 None 1,800 370,000 400,000 None 2,000 400,000 400,000 None Maximum Day, Fire Protection and Emergency Storage Criteria Another approach is to consider the individual storage components for equalization, fire demand, and emergency reserve versus the available water supply production facilities. The water production and storage must be considered together, since an increase in production may decrease the amount of water storage required. Water storage requirements using this approach for the Navarre Water System and the Highway 12 Water System are summarized in Table 4C-119 and Table 4C-120. The current storage is not able to meet the maximum day, fire protection and emergency storage criteria for either water system. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 12 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply TABLE 4C-11: Required Storage based on High Day -Navarre Population 2'200 2,400 2,600 2,800 (Existing) 3,000 Fire Demand (gpm)' 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Max. Day Demand (gpm) 421 459 498 536 574 Peak Usage (gpm) 2,421 2,459 2,498 2,536 2,574 Firm Pumping Supply (gpm)2 500 500 500 500 500 Withdrawal from Storage (gpm) 1,921 1,959 1,998 2,036 2,074 Fire Flow Duration (hrs) 3 3 3 3 3 Fire Demand Storage (gallons) 345,780 352,620 359,640 366,480 373,320 Emergency Storage (gallons)3 121,248 132,192 143,424 154,368 165,312 Total Storage Needed (gallons) 467,028 484,812 503,064 520,848 538,632 Current Available Storage (gallons) 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 Net Storage Surplus/Deficit (gallons) -267,028 -284,812 -303,064 -320,848 -338,632 (1) Fire flow requirements vary within the City depending on type and construction of facilities. Fire flow requirements for normal residential development vary between 1,000 to 1,500 gpm. For multi -family and commercial areas such as the downtown business district, residential apartment areas, school and industrial areas; flows of 3,500 gpm for 3 hours are generally considered acceptable. (2) Based on firm capacity listed in Table 4C-7�. (3) Emergency storage equals 20% of maximum day demand. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 13 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply TABLE 4C-12: Required Storage based on High Day - Highway 12 800 Population 400(Existing) 1,200 1,600 Fire Demand (gpm)1 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Max. Day Demand (gpm) 422 844 1,266 1,689 Peak Usage (gpm) 2,422 2,844 3,266 3,689 Firm Pumping Supply (gpm)2 500 500 500 1,000 Withdrawal from Storage (gpm) 1,922 2,344 2,766 2,689 Fire Flow Duration (hrs) 3 3 3 3 Fire Demand Storage (gallons) 345,960 421,920 497,880 484,020 Emergency Storage (gallons)' 121,536 243,072 364,608 486,432 Total Storage Needed (gallons) 467,496 664,992 862,488 970,452 Current Available Storage (gallons) 400,000 400,000 400,000 400,000 Net Storage Surplus/Deficit (gallons) -67,496 -264,992 -462,488 -570,452 (1) Fire flow requirements vary within the City depending on type and construction of facilities. Fire flow requirements for normal residential development vary between 1,000 to 1,500 gpm. For multi -family and commercial areas such as the downtown business district, residential apartment areas, school and industrial areas; flows of 3,500 gpm for 3 hours are generally considered acceptable. (2) Based on firm capacity listed in Table 4C-8 (3) Emergency storage equals 20% of maximum day demand. Water Distribution System General The analysis of a water distribution system often requires the use of a computer model of the system. A computer model is prepared which is calibrated with field data resulting in a model that simulates the known conditions of the system as closely as possible. This model provides a basis for simulation of existing system operations and deficiencies as well as future operating conditions of the system. From these simulations, determinations can be made as to the improvements that the system will need. The water distribution system for the City of Orono was modeled using Bentley's WaterCad version 8.0. Modeling information can be found in the Water Supply Plan. 2018. Kev findings are summarized here. The eem-Buten- netwofk is used to City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 14 ON 111 City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 14 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply Analysis of Existing Water System Existing Water Pressure. Average Day (AD) pressures in the existing system range from 50 to 78 psi. These pressures are within acceptable standards. According to Ten States Standards for Water Works (2012), an industry standard that the Minnesota Department of Health has adopted, pressures in the system should meet the following: "The minimum working pressure in the distribution system should be 35 psi (240 kPa) and the normal working pressure should be approximately 60 to 80 psi (410 - 550 kPa). When static pressures exceed 100 psi (690 kPa), pressure reducing devices shall be provided on mains or as part of the meter setting on individual service lines in the distribution system." Peak Hour (PH) pressures, which represent some of the highest non -emergency demands that a system will require, range from 44 to 73 psi, which is again within acceptable standards. Therefore, no deficiencies were identified during computer system analysis. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 15 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply Existing Available Fire Flow The modeled fire flows were run up to a maximum of 5,000 gpm. The minimum fire flow available at any given point in a system should not be less than 500 gpm at a residual pressure of 20 psi. This represents the amount of water required to provide for two standard hose streams on a fire in a typical residential area for residential dwellings with spacing of 100 feet. The distance between buildings and the corresponding fire flow is summarized in Table 4C-13 TABLE 4C-13: Recommended Fire Flows Distance Between Buildings Required Fire Flow (feet) (gpm) More Than 100 500 31-100 750 30-11 1,000 Less Than 11 1,500 Generally, available fire flows are adequate throughout the water distribution system. Areas with less than 500 gpm mostly include residential properties with limited water main looping due to locations along cul-de-sacs or dead end roads. The majority of these locations are in the Navarre system and the Wayzata System Extension. Pipe Velocities and Friction Losses Pipe segments are considered potentially deficient, or most -limiting, if they have the following conditions: ■ Velocities greater than 5 ft/s; and ■ Head losses greater than 10 ft/1000 ft. Velocities in pipe segments are acceptable up to about 10 ft/s during emergency or extreme demand conditions of short duration. As velocities increase, pipe friction increases and problems with water hammer occur. This is especially true in systems with higher pressures. The system has been checked for locations where velocities and head losses meet the above stated conditions. There are several locations where pipe velocities exceed 5 ft/s during emergency or peak demand flows. During normal operating conditions, no segments with high velocities or high head loss were observed. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 16 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply Long Lake Interconnections During emergency events, the Orono Highway 12 system and the Long Lake system are able to provide water service to each other through a series of interconnections. In the past, this arrangement is able to work for extended periods of time due to the large extra capacity of Long Lake wells, along with the large elevated storage in the City of Orono. In the event of emergency water supply needs, where one of the system wells are to be off-line for an extended period, the combined firm supply capacity is able to meet the maximum day demands of the combined systems by nearly 500,000 gallons. In addition, the combined water system can meet domestic demands for its customer base during the event that either tower is taken off line for repairs or rehabilitation. During these outages, available fire flows will be reduced significantly compared to when each tower is in operation. In the event of the Orono tank being taken off line, available fire flows will be reduced to approximately 700-750 gpm throughout the northwest area of the Highway 12 system. While adequate for residential fire flows, the fire department should be aware that tankers may be needed on-call if a larger fire occurs at a large industrial or institutional customer. There are currently four interconnections between the Long Lake and Orono (Highway 12) water systems. Two of the interconnections have automatic pressure reducing valves (PRVs) which allow emergency flow in either direction if an emergency occurs and system pressure drops below a minimum pressure setting. The interconnections are located near the following intersections: ■ Virginia Avenue and Wayzata Boulevard (Automatic PRV) • Shaughnessy Avenue and Wayzata Boulevard • Brimhall Avenue and Wayzata Boulevard(Automatic PRV) • Willow Drive North and Wayzata Boulevard The PRVs rarely operate, especially since the set points for operation are at low levels which are not impacted by normal operating conditions. The primary operation of these interconnections would be during an emergency such as a large fire when additional water would be required for the duration of the fire. In the event that one system loses supply capacity or a tower is taken out of service, these interconnections can also be utilized. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 17 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply PROPOSED WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS General The major water system components have been evaluated in the previous sections. A detailed description of the proposed improvements is presented in this section. Water Supply The Navarre Water System currently has two wells with a firm capacity of 0.6 MGD. During the last four years, the maximum daily demand has averaged less than 0.5 MGD, which means the current water system has excess capacity. The service area of the Navarre Water System is close to full development so the population growth within the service area is expected to be minimal. Based off the current capacity of the wells and the expected population growth, no additional wells are needed for the Navarre Water System. The Highway 12 Water System was recently upgraded from one well which ran nearly 24 hours per day during the summer, to two wells. The firm capacity is 0.6 MGD. Based off the current capacity of the wells and the expected population growth, no additional wells are needed for the Navarre Water System. Treatment Facilities The objective of a water system is to provide quality water that is fit for domestic and commercial use. The City currently does not have any major water quality issues that need to be addressed, or major outstanding issues with both the Navarre WTP and the Highway 12 Well House Water Storage As discussed previously, the Navarre Water System has a current storage deficit of 20,000 gallons using the average day criteria and a storage deficit of 267,000 gallons using the maximum day, fire protection, and emergency storage criteria. The existing storage capacity is very close to meeting the current average demand and very little growth is expected in the Navarre Distribution System. Therefore, it is concluded that storage capacity is not needed at this time. If the City sees an increase in water demand for the Navarre System it we -may want to consider additional storage that would also meet the maximum day, fire protection, and emergency storage criteria. The Highway 12 Water System currently meets the average day criteria and has a storage deficit of 67,500 gallons using the maximum day, fire protection, and emergency storage criteria. Given that the existing storage meets the average day criteria and nearly meets the maximum day, fire protection, and emergency storage criteria, additional storage is not needed at this time. As water demands increase the City will need to consider added storage for the Highway 12 Water System. Distribution System City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 18 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply Proposed water distribution system expansion is illustrated on Map 4C-3' shown i Figu e 4C 15. Improvements include water main extensions to serve expansion areas along the west edge of the Highway 12 system. In addition, a portion of the existing Highway 12 system is recommended to be increased in size from an 8 inch main to a 12 inch. This improved trunk main will increase available fire flow capacity during emergencies. In addition, water availability through the east interconnection will be improved. Depending on the future location of a new supply well to serve the Highway 12 system, the increased trunk capacity may also be required to allow adequate transmission of the increased supply capacity to the water tower. Long Lake Interconnections Based on computer modeling, not all of the existing interconnections are needed in the future. We recommend that the two primary automatic PRV interconnections (Virginia Avenue (cr�,Wayzata Boulevard and Brimhall Avenue gWayzata Boulevard) are maintained. These two are leeated a4 Virginia Avenue and Wayzata Boulevard and Br-imhall Aveffae and Wayzata Boulevard. Two interconnections will provide adequate fire protection during an emergency. In addition, having these on the east and west sides of the distribution system provides for more redundancy of service as well. Upgrades to a 12 inch main along Wayzata Boulevard between Brimhall Avenue and Willow Drive North will also provide a better hydraulic connection for transmission of water during emergency events. WATER SYSTEM EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PLAN Purpose The Orono Water System Emergency Preparedness Plan is a detailed description of procedures to follow should disruption to normal water service occur. Water system emergencies can occur as a result of accidental contamination, mechanical problems, power failures, drought, and other natural disasters. Disruptions to normal service may affect the entire water system or only parts of the system. While this plan cannot address all potential disasters, it is intended to provide City staff with a procedural guideline for implementation of actions resulting in the restoration of normal water service with a minimum of disruption, and minimizing any potential health risks. This plan is part of the City of Orono Emergency Preparedness Plan. Emergency Telephone Lists The City maintains a list of telephone numbers for key utility and City personnel, contacts in adjacent communities which may be affected, and other key local, state and federal contacts. Current Water Sources and Service Area 'As -Built' plans and specifications for both the Navarre and Highway 12 water systems are located on the City's GIS and Asset Management Systems with hard copies located in the Public Works Map room at 2700 Kelley Parkway. These plans include service area maps as well as groundwater source information, individual well logs and pump specifications. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 19 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply Procedures For Augmenting Water Supplies A number of alternatives exist for augmenting existing water supplies: City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 20 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply Interconnections with Adjacent Communities Navarre System. Orono's Navarre water system is interconnected with the water systems operated by the City of Minnetonka Beach and the City of Spring Park.. The City of Orono has Reciprocal Emergency Water Supply agreements with both Minnetonka Beach and Spring Park (see AppendixWater Supply Plan, 2018). The high water level elevation in the Navarre water tower is estimated to be 1102.0 feet. The high water level elevation for Minnetonka Beach's water tower is estimated to be 1091.0 feet. The high water level elevation of Spring Park's water tower is estimated to be 1102.0 feet. Minnetonka Beach has two connection points with Orono - a 10" connection at Old County Road and an 8" connection at Northview Road. Spring Park was two 6" interconnections with Orono, one on Northern Avenue and the other at the intersection of Shadywood and Sunset. In the event that both wells are out of service the Navarre system could potentially be supplied by either the Spring Park or Minnetonka Beach systems, although it would likely place less of a burden on the Spring Park system. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 21 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply Table 4C-14: Additional Water Resources Other Water Capacity (GPM & List of services, Supply System MGD) Note Any Limitations On Use equipment, supplies Owner available to respond City of Minnetonka 470 GPM, 0.677 417,000 GPD. SEE AGREEMENT. WATER SUPPLY Beach MGD City of Spring Park 1095D GPM, 1.576 MG 969,000 GPD. SEE AGREEMENT WATER SUPPLY Other Water Capacity (GPM & List of services, Supply System MGD) Note Any Limitations On Use equipment, supplies Owner available to respond City of Long Lake MGD GPM, 1.584 630,000 GPD. SEE AGREEMENT WATER SUPPLY Highway 12 System Four interconnection points exist between Orono's Highway 12 water system and the Long Lake water system at: Virginia Avenue and Wayzata Boulevards, Shaughnessy Avenue and Wayzata Boulevard;; Brimhall Avenue and Wayzata Boulevards, & Willow Drive North and Wayzata Boulevard. The City of Orono has a Reciprocal Emergency Water Supply agreement with the City of Long Lake. The high water elevation of the Highway 12 water tower is 1165'. Use Of Surface And Ground Waters As An Alternative Source. None- The nearest surface water source to the Navarre area is Lake Minnetonka. The nearest surface water source to Highway 12 is Long Lake. However, both lakes have a high susceptibility to contamination. Due to the high cost of treatment, neither Lake Minnetonka nor Long Lake are feasible as sources of water. Demand Reduction Procedures Demand Reduction Potential In a water supply emergency, demand could be reduced by implementation of various measures such as voluntary restrictions or a lawn sprinkling ban. Additionally, non- essential high-volume uses such as commercial car washing could be banned. Both measures could potentially result in short term demand reductions. Short -Term Demand Reduction Procedures Orono Municipal Code Section 14-136 establishes regulations for the use of water during periods of water shortage. Subsection 136(e)(1) enumerates a number of restrictions which the City Council may order singly or in combination to effectuate demand reduction. These restrictions are listed in order of progressively increasing stringency: ■ Voluntary restriction, to be implemented via public notice in the local City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 22 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply newspapers, "bill stuffers" and public service announcements. ■ Odd/even watering ban in which residents of addresses ending in an even digit may water on even -numbered calendar days and residents of addresses ending in an odd digit may water on odd -numbered calendar days. ■ Complete or partial ban on water use for watering lawns, trees and shrubs, irrigation, car washing, filling swimming pools, air conditioning, and/or other uses determined by the City to be non-essential, or any combination thereof. Water Emergency Condition Orono Municipal Code Section 14-137 establishes procedures which may be implemented by the City Administrator in the event of a water emergency. The Administrator may order an immediate general sprinkling ban or an odd -even sprinkling ban, and may curtail industrial water use. The Administrator may approve exemptions to such actions, and establish necessary conditions for such exemptions, upon written request from 1) commercial enterprises whose economic well-being is dependent upon sprinkling, irrigating or watering of a lawn, grass or turf owned, leased or operated by such enterprise; 2) employees and agents of the City wherein lawn, grass or turf used for play fields or areas owned or operated by the City require more frequent watering to prevent unreasonable damage thereto; and 3) owners and lessees of lands newly sodded or grass seeded which requires sprinkling or irrigation to prevent loss of new sod, seed or immature turf or grasses. The following actions will be taken to control demand during a Water Emergency Condition: Administrative Actions ■ An educational program that describes the severity and effects ofthe emergency will be instituted. ■ Prohibit outdoor sprinkling on a continual basis. ■ Increase penalties and fees for violation of the sprinkling ordinance. ■ Limit or prohibit swimming pool filling, car washing, and other similar nonessential residential uses. ■ Limit or prohibit use of water for commercial car washes. ■ Restrict restaurants from serving water to customers on a voluntarybasis. ■ Require operators of large air conditioning systems (if they exist) to recycle cooled water as appropriate. Utility Operation Program. The performance of routine public operations shall be redirected to reduce water demand. The following actions which can be easily implemented on a short-term basis may affect the aesthetics of the City but will not harm City facilities on a long-term basis: ■ Reduce sewer cleaning activities. ■ Reduce fire hydrant and main flushing activities to an absolute minimum. ■ Eliminate street cleaning activities. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 23 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply ■ Eliminate fire -fighting training practices that utilize water. ■ Purchase water from the City of Long Lake if the emergency condition is limited to the Orono water supply system. PROCEDURES FOR WATER ALLOCATION Allocation of water by the City of Orono may be required during a severe water shortage. When supply augmentation or demand reduction measures are determined to be inadequate, water allocation may be implemented in conformance with the following priorities established by Minnesota Statutes 103G.261: 1_First Priority: Domestic water supply, excluding commercial and industrial uses of municipal water supply, and use for power production that meets the statutory contingency planning requirements. 2. Second Priority: Water uses involving consumption of less than 10,000 gallons of water per day. Third Priority: Agricultural irrigation, and processing of agricultural products involving consumption in excess of 10,000 gallons per day. 4. Fourth Priority: Power production in excess of the use provided for in the contingency plan noted above under "First Priority". 4- 5. 5. Fifth Priority: Uses other than agricultural irrigation, processing of agricultural products and power production, involving consumption in excess of 10,000 gallons per day. 6. Sixth Priority: Non-essential uses. Non-essential uses are defined in Minnesota Statutes 103G.291 as including but not limited to lawn sprinkling, vehicle washing, and golf course and park irrigation. Non-essential water uses will be the first water uses subject to allocation restrictions. Quick responses to restrict non-essential uses during periods of limited supplies will help protect domestic and economic uses of water. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 24 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply Triggers For Implementing Plan Components Navarre A water emergency condition for the Navarre system is defined if one or more of the following conditions occur: ■ The water tower levels are insufficient to provide adequate fire protection, or —The production facilities are unable to reestablish a minimum water reservein storage, or ■ The water demand in one 24-hour period exceeds the firm pumping capacity of the system, 720,000 gallons. Highway 12 A water Emergency Conditiong for the Highway 12 system is defined if one or more of the following conditions occur: ■ The water tower levels are insufficient to provide adequate fire protection, or —The production facilities are unable to reestablish a minimum water reservein storage, or ■ The water demand in one 24-hour period exceeds 575,000 GPD, i.e. approximately 80% of the 720,000 GPD system capacity. Wayzata System Extension The Wayzata system extension is a small part of the total Wayzata system. Triggers and plan implementations established by City ofWayzata will be adhered to. The City of Orono may include the Wayzata System Extension water customers in any general water restriction placed on Orono residents. Long Lake System Extensions The Long Lake system extensions are a small part of the total Long Lake system. Triggers and plan implementations established by City of Long Lake will be adhered to. The City of Orono may include the Long Lake System Extension water customers in any general water restriction placed on Orono residents. Notice City ordinances define two levels of urgency in establishing water use restrictions. During periods of water shortage which are not considered to be water emergencies, the City Council may implement restrictions by resolution or Ordinance. Such resolution shall define: the uses of water that will be restricted; the types of water supply that will be restricted, such as the public water system, private wells, lake or other surface water systems; times during which the restriction will apply; whether the use restriction will apply to all property in the City or will vary depending on City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 25 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply location or identification of property; when the restrictions will be implemented and when they will terminate; and whether the restrictions will be voluntary or involuntary. Notice of the restrictions will be posted on the website, sent via social media and direct mailings and published in the local newspaper, and will become effective 24 hours after passage and publication. If the City Administrator determines that the water pressure and available water in the municipal water system reaches a level which endangers the public health or safety, he may declare a water emergency. Upon such declaration, notice will be given to the news media, social media and city website, and all orders restricting water use shall be enforceable one (1) hour from the time of such notice. Enforcement By ordinance, violation of a mandatory water use restriction is a misdemeanor. T4+e City of Orono has not established -penalty eh-arges for non-eompliane ailure to comply after repeated notiees wi may lead to fines or discontinued water service (Section 14-75). Water use restrictions will be monitored by Citystaff and enforced as necessary CONSERVATION PLAN Role Of Conservation. The City of Orono Water Conservation Plan is intended to reduce the demand for water, improve the efficiency of use of water, and reduce losses and waste of water. Water conservation has the potential to delay or eliminate the need for development of supplemental water sources to meet peak demands for nonessential water uses. Reduction in the peak demand through conservation efforts is preferable to major City expenditures for increasing water source, treatment and storage capacities. Water Conservation Potential. For- -Navarre System serves residential and commercial uses, a ,.,.:v,-..,rily ,-esiden4ia sefviee conservation efforts will be focused on ensuring the wise use of water as well as updating the treatment facility and making system repairs as necessary. As the residential housing stock is renovated by homeowners, City enforcement of the State plumbing codes will ensure use of water efficient fixtures. The Highway 12 system serves a variety of users including both single-family and multi -family residential uses that are still developing, commercial and industrial uses, and the Orono Schools complex. New homes will be required by State plumbing codes to install water -efficient fixtures. New or expanding commercial, industrial, and institutional users will be encouraged (and required when appropriate) to establish water -conserving policies and use water -efficient equipment. Water Conservation Programs The city will endeavor to implement the MnDNR Conservation Objectives and Strategies. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 26 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply MnDNR objectives 1. MnDNR Objective 1: Reduce Unaccounted (Non -Revenue) Water loss to Less than 10%. The city is currently meeting this objective. Thorough water audits, leak detection and preventive maintenance. 2. MnDNR Objective 2: Achieve Less than 75 Residential Gallons per Capita Demand (GPCD). The city is meeting this objective with a 5 year average per capita demand of 73 Gal/day. The average residential per capita water demand has been on a downward trend since a high of 93.4 gpcd in 2006 to a low of 60.2 gpcd in 2015. 3. MnDNR Objective 3: Achieve at least 1.5% annual reduction in non-residential per capita water use. Education- The City will continue to provide residents information pamphlets via newsletter and social media as such pamphlets become available from the DNR and MDH. There is very little C/UI or Ag water usage within the City of Orono. 4. MnDNR Objective 4: Achieve a Decreasing Trend in Total Per Capita Demand. The Residential per capita water demand has been trending downward since 2005, with a years of spikes within the data. These spikes can likely be attributed to years with less rainfall, which leads to greater irrigation use within the residential sector. It is likely that the trend will continue downward as time progresses due to increased education about water use and a recently revised water rate structure. The C/UI per capita water demand appears to be trending downward overall with various spikes and fluctuations throughout the years. These sometimes large fluctuations can be attributed to the smaller and ever changing client base that is present in the City within the C/UI category. 5. MnDNR Objective 5: Reduce Ratio of Maximum day (peak day) to the Average Day Demand to Less Than 2.6. Calculate a ten-year average (2005 — 2014) of the ratio of maximum day demand to average day demand is 4.8. This high ratio is likely due to excessive irrigation in the summer months. The city will continue to encourage responsible water use though educational efforts and discourage individual high water use through our tiers water rate structure. 6. MnDNR Objective 6: Implement Demand Reduction Measures. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 27 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply City Conservation Strategies 1. Metering. All water customers on Orono's three water systems are metered. All new users added to the system will be metered. All customers purchase meters through the City, and meters are tested, recalibrated, and repaired on an as -required basis. Meters are read by City personnel quarterly. 2. Water Audits, Leak Detection and Repair. The volume of unaccounted-for water is determined on an annual basis. Unaccounted- for water is defined as the volume of water withdrawn from the source minus the volume of water sold. Water not accounted for may be a result of meter under -registration; various forms of public unmetered use such as hydrant flushing, appropriation by fire departments, and illegal connections or appropriations; or system leakage. The city conducts annual leak detection as a means of identifying and repair leaks. 3. Conservation -Oriented Water Rates. Water customers are billed quarterly. Water rates are reviewed by the City annually and adjusted as necessarywith the goal of paying for the true cost of supplying, treating and delivering water as well as maintaining the distribution system. Past reviews have resulted in the adoption of a hydrant charge to those properties where water is available but unconnected. Capital expenditures are financed through the use of connection charges, area charges, and special assessments. Since 2010 the city has used a conservation -oriented water rate structure. The conservation -oriented structure establishes Water Usage Tiers that vary between residential, multi -family and commercial users and are based on usage. 4. Regulation. Orono has adopted a number of regulations to provide short-term demand reductions and long-term improvements in water use efficiencies: ■ Short -Term Demand Reduction Procedures: Municipal Code Sections 14-136 and 14-137 define measures for short-term demand reduction. The Code identifies a number of restrictions which the City Council may order singly or in combination to effectuate demand reduction, and provides procedures for enforcement of such measures. ■ Long -Term Demand Reduction: Long-term demand reduction will be accomplished by enforcement of the State and Federal Plumbing Codes which require the use of water efficient fixtures in new home construction as well as when retrofitting. 5. Education and Information Programs. The City of Orono will make an effort to promote efficient water use on an ongoing basis. Education of the public on the benefits of water conservation will include articles City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 28 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply in the City newsletter as well as the use of "bill stuffers", and support for school curriculums on water resources such as National Drinking Water Week. During periods of limited water supplies when public awareness is high, the City will issue public service announcements through the local mass media including local newspapers, and will notify the public via direct mailings of water conservation and demand reduction measures in effect. 6. Retrofitting Programs. Existing plumbing codes requiring the use of water -conserving fixtures when retrofitting buildings, will continue to be enforced by the Building Inspections Department. The City will investigate whether establishment of a mandatory retrofitting program unrelated to concurrent remodeling projects wouldbe feasible or cost efficient. GOALS AND POLICIES The City of Orono's water supply goals are as follows: 1. Provide an adequate supply of potable water to all residences and occupied properties in Orono. 2. Provide an adequate supply of water for fire protection in urban -density neighborhoods and commercial/industrial districts in Orono. 3. Protect the City sies natural resources- Water. The City of Orono's water supply policies are as follows: 1. All occupied properties within Orono shall be provided with a potable water supply and minimum sanitary facilities as required by the Minnesota Health Department. 2. Individual wells will be considered to be acceptable water supply for low- density urban and rural residential neighborhoods. Industrial, commercial and multi -family residential development will be permitted only within the municipal water service area where supplies are sufficient for domestic, process and fire protection purposes. 3. Municipal water supply systems will be provided only within the Urban Service Area. Rural land use must be of the type and density to be_adequately served by individual private wells. 4. Municipal water supply systems will be provided only where sufficient land use density and/or user demand will make the public investment economically feasible. Municipal water systems will not be extended to all neighborhoods in the urban service area. Many urban residential areas that received municipal sewer for public health and environmental reasons have relatively low land use density and can be adequately served by private wells at much less total cost than by extensive water system City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 29 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply extension. 5. New urban developments will be served by developer -installed mains. Municipal water mains may be extended within the boundaries of the urban area to serve new development on vacant properties provided the development occurs at the established zoned density, the development does not overburden or exceed the design capacity of the existing system, and the developer pays and finances the entire cost of the project. 6. The city will operate and maintain the municipal water system. To assure cost effectiveness and quality control, the City will own, operate andmaintain the entire municipal water system of mains and laterals up to and including the curb stop on each property. Each property owner must purchase a meter from the City and install it in an approved manner and location. 7. All water serviced properties must be connected. No new well or well repair permits will be issued where municipal water service is available. Existing operable wells may be used provided the water is potable and the well conforms to MHD requirements. Individual connections will be required for each separate residence and/or place of business. 8. Water service construction will conform to state codes. Installation of new building service lines, connection stubs, or water mains shall be by licensed plumbing contractors, and installation or repair of wells shall be by licensed well drillers; all construction shall utilize materials and methods approved by the Minnesota State Board of Health. 9. The City will endeavor to meet the MnDNRs Conservation Objectives. FUTURE WATER SYSTEM Orono's plan for future water facilities includes upgrades to existing local water facilities. Future Water System Improvements The City's focus on future water system needs will be on a limited number of extensions to service new developments within the existing urban area and maintenance of the existing system. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 30 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply Future Water System Expansion Proiects The table below lists possible future sewer expansion projects. Table 4C-15: Future Expansion Projects Improvement Projected Year of Triggering Event completion Orono Preserve Development — Water Under 1 Distribution main to serve 39 single family 2018 Construction homes Shadywood Villas Development -Water Under 2 Distribution to service 7 single family 2018 Construction homes. CSAH 112 Water Main Extension- Approved Extension of water main West along CSAH Preliminary Plat 4 112 from Old Crystal Bay Road to serve 2019' for future developments planned on the south Developments side of CSAH 112. 5 Highway 12 Water Main upsize to 12". 2020 CSAH 112 Turn back Ph3 project 1 Schedule is dependent on development timing, size and/or location. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 31 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply Future Seweir-Water Maintenance Needs Orono is committed to maintaining and improving the existing water distribution system. In addition to the normal routine and reactive maintenance operations the city is committed to the following proactive/ preventive maintenance programs: Table 4C-16: Future Serer -Water System Maintenance Needs Resourcing City water service will be self-supporting. The operation, maintenance and depreciation financing of the municipal water supply system will be completely financed by user charges sufficient to cover all allocable costs without requiring any general tax subsidy. Water charges shall be equitably established on the basis of actual use and/or fire protection advantage while at the same time designed to encourage resource conservation. Operating and Maintenance Budget City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 32 Annual Program Description Purpose Budget (2018$s) This project includes the replacement Many of the city's water mains were Water Main of select water mains in within the installed in late 1960s and early 1970s and replacements system. Where possible utility are cast iron pipe. Over the years the city $200,000 replacements are synchronized with has had issues with cast iron pipe road reconstructions. deterioration based. Valve Each year all of the Water Valves Ensures proper operation. Helps identify $5,000 Exercising within the city should be exercised. future replacement needs. Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation projects Reduce Inflow and Infiltration (I&I) into the Hydrant will consist of Cured in Place Pipe Sanitary sewer systems. The lining process Flushing (CIPP) lining of infiltration susceptible creates and new durable pipe within the $265,225 sanitary sewer pipes, manhole older pipe at a much reduced cost from open reconstruction, and lid replacement. curing or directionally drilling. Well inspection This project includes the inspection and To ensure a continued, dependable supply of and rehabilitation/ replacement of a Well's quality water from the City's well periodic 520,000 maintenance pumps, motors, and column piping. maintenance is required Each well is inspected every 7 years. This project includes the replacement Water Meter of all of the water meters within the Meters need have a 15 year life. $90000 Replacement city. The project will be phased over 5 ' years. Pressure wash of north water tower, inside and out; perform repairs to Water Tower interior and exterior coatings and preventive maintenance $12,500 Maintenance perform preventive maintenance checks and services. (Once every 5 years) Resourcing City water service will be self-supporting. The operation, maintenance and depreciation financing of the municipal water supply system will be completely financed by user charges sufficient to cover all allocable costs without requiring any general tax subsidy. Water charges shall be equitably established on the basis of actual use and/or fire protection advantage while at the same time designed to encourage resource conservation. Operating and Maintenance Budget City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 32 CMP Part 4C. Water Supply The City shall remain committed to fully funding the operations and maintenance needs of the City's water system. Funding will continue to come from the Water fees. Capital Improvement Plan The City manages capital expenditures for the Water system as part of the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The CIP provides long-term planning and management of infrastructure throughout the City. The CIP is a planning document that presents a 5+ year overview of scheduled capital projects to address the City's goals for public infrastructure. The CIP includes a long-term financing plan that allows the City to allocate funds for these projects based on assigned priorities. The 5+ year horizon of the CIP provides the City with an opportunity to evaluate project priorities annually and to adjust the timing, scope and cost of projects as new information becomes available. The information contained in this plan represents an estimate of improvement costs based on present knowledge and expected conditions. Changes in community priorities, infrastructure condition and inflation rates require that adjustments be made on a routine basis. Funding for Acquisition and Capital Improvements Funding for Water system Capital improvement projects comes from the Enterprise Water Fund, special assessments, and connection charges. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4C, Page 33 �9k6SH��% 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN Katrina \ °012 Lake Turner Road '0 � o o T Drake Dr 3 c ° 0 0 1 v i� , et Geek Me Qa � 0 1 G \eAQ- Moline Road 0 Q 1 19N i) �aYside Painter Road b4% W Branch Road Cnty Road 151 �0 ou c �� Iw�www 1� 0� 1 Sunnyfield Road E a 1 Z 0 c Jenning's Bay F R Game Farm Road E Legend 17 w► 1 c I West Dutch v i Lake > 1 m Harrison r.r L Bay d 1 � ,nwood Blvd-w•w+••w�•w�I �t o r V Shoreline or •r City Limits Lakes & Ponds 1, +t 2040 MUSA Rivers & Streams .i 0 3,500 Feet Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT Water Service Area November 2018 /L \ Moon .. .. _ _ _ •�•�... ..9d _ c Lake ..swrrrrrrZL' r• Z p 96 \ A ii; " I 1 o ° Dickey r,°ad q�e N I V Lake s Sprin ` L in Suga rlg 1 Jz q �; Lydian .o 0 41 �Q p°m_ ♦� Lake !0 -w �♦ wDaniels st' t 1 1 P 0 12 PO,•�: i LL .. Grand AvOrcFiara��n /q 1 1 —i US 1 1 1 �' • f 1 'Po Wo` Lo - 1 1 go Wayzata gt ewp ♦ .1 1 — • • vd W �.E ♦ Id r T -w 11♦ r,;a° w 1 1 12 1 Shore 1). �w e 400, •`•♦1 1 j 1 Lafayette ; 'Lw.* Bay i gee SprintPa' V, I *� lor n , N♦� \\ 2 Smith P,„ . M.M. �O Ave E Wayzata Bay Water Distribution North Pressure Zone Navarre Pressure Zone Long Lake Pressure Zone Wayzata Pressure Zone BOLTN /1 & MENK Real People. Real Solutions. Z c J Ave N Proposed o Expansion Areas w Wells 0 0 Water Storage a, Watermain r Map 4C-1 �q jC6 S H OR�' 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN k Ot a� Q Z a 3 Ch v errY Ave •N Shore Dr West �Voad Arm Ii 1 'ter• -r r I '0 Togo Road d Ln IP if Shoreline or 1 f i I / Snnc Parl / Bay 1 �5 Proposed Expansion Areas N yo Kelxet Road Shore Or ..�,�_.._.._.._.._.._.._..�es. ._.._.._.._.._ �o m CL i1 /♦ ohny �O ti♦ �� ~♦♦ C stal � Bohns ; ' '•,. Bay Point,! ~` f� w -R atl O d/Roao, 1 vie stw Arcola Ln oaa� N°Shoreline pr 000 Ln Crystal PI ingston Ave Lyric Ave Lafayette Sh dQ, y foo � ,rP�y oad °0 r I o� I Carman's Q¢ �`' ; Bay o Gays n. � 1 Casco Point ' a�° d Legend a r°.. . •r City Limits Lakes & Ponds 1, +t 2040 MUSA Rivers & Streams .i 0 0.33 Miles Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT I�A a �a m a 3 N 1�so Z 1 � Lake y e, Class,� o Kelley P_ki d Wayzata --------, y 100, r November 2018 BOLTN /1 & MENK Real People. Real Solutions. Dickey, Lake r m N c W �Or"Ood O� i.r� rel `♦` Daniels St a`tie ♦, Grand Ave 1 m is Nei\so� Z 1 ID C a J a ami �1 hep o High Ln ♦' 1 Watertown Road �� 1 a Devin Ln ♦ Ji °�A, 1 Some Ln Z o Cohb Dr\ . �� s 1 ♦ Q'ep�W -� ____ B 1n♦ti e..o u _ 1 ro 1 Z 1 -a R IOI;Long�a°.� 1- ■1 dfe a d 1 12, 4th 1 �Odq • 1 1 1 1 - WaYzataBlvd W �0aa�5 1 0 12 a o06 1 ° i ; We s 8th Ave N ti Water Distribution North Pressure Zone Navarre Pressure Zone Long Lake Pressure Zone Wayzata Pressure Zone 0 Proposed Expansion Areas W Wells 0 Water Storage Watermain Map 4C-2 �q jC6 S H OR�' 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN ask �� h S Q D ore Or 3 C >sl perry Ave �.� 0 N Shore Or 0 West `n Road hny ~� Arm 0 IC Crystal � Bohns ; •,. Bay Point,!~` Fao' 1 , e O°d/oaR v�ew_Roatl°' Arcola Ln I If5°�� N°�kS Ln � Shoreline �t o° d _ 1 -Togo Road �a� IP i+ - Shoreline or 1 f i i Sprinc Parl Bay Crystal PI ingston Ave Lyric Ave Lafayette Sh y 00 Road °e P I GJ I Carman's Bay �y° ♦�� Com/ o Gays n. � I� 1 Casco Point ' a�° d Legend �ar�tOa °�w _ _tr_,rrtrr •r City Limits Lakes & Ponds 1, +t 2040 MUSA Rivers & Streams .i 0 0.33 Miles Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT Proposed Water Distribution System yoLodb tY a y6= p,,jesow _ _ 1� Lake y e Class. s Z W W tY N tll U 0 Wayzata Blvd W �rrt r.r o }- J ' �I J ..-�_ 12ti7; — 1 z � 1 c J 1 1 FIghLn u 410 Watertown Road 1 2 1 1 Somet� D q`l aa�5� Y06 1 0 12 a i We 1_1 November 2018 O� o- � 1 Y Dickeys � Lake 3 m N c �dr ^'ood O� Daniels St j BOLTN /1 & MENK Real People. Real Solutions. a � m c � e� . 1 1 Devin Ln_ _ �^•� 1 Co%h Dry . � 1 [Old Loj 1 �r c 1 Z 1 -a R Q"- 4th �Odry �aFe 1 U. w�.w� w w '� w � �♦ 1 �' 1 1 1 � '• � WaYzataBlvdW �0 Water Distribution Upgraded Watermain Future Watermain Watermain C Wells 0 Water Storage Map 4C-2 Proposed Expansion Areas North Pressure Zone Navarre Pressure Zone Long Lake Pressure Zone Wayzata Pressure Zone CMP Part 4D. Public Services Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS CMP PART 4D PUBLIC SERVICES PLAN Page Introduction 2 Public Safety Services 3 Public Education 5 Government Agencies and Services Privately Operated Utilities and Services 9 City Owned Land, Rights, and Easements 11 Coordination with Adjoining Municipalities 13 City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4D, Page 1 CMP Part 4D. Public Services Plan CMP PART 4D PUBLIC SERVICES PLAN INTRODUCTION This chapter of the Community Management Plan includes a brief review of all the many other necessary services and facilities of a municipality that were not mandated elements of Twin Cities Regional planning. The elements contained in this Chapter have varying degrees of impact upon metropolitan systems, but they all have important ties to Orono's local planning development and land use concerns. The Goals, Policies and Plans outlined in this Chapter are an integral part of the total Community Management Plan and have been derived from joint and concurrent consideration of all community planning elements. This Chapter of the CMP is prepared and presented for the following purposes: 1 The Public Services Plan is intended to place the identified services and facilities within the context of the overall Community Management Plan. 2 The Public Services Plan is intended to be a management tool for City officials and City staff in the development and management of municipal services and facilities necessary to support the basic planning objectives of the City. -1 The Public Services Plan is intended to advise our neighboring municipalities and other governmental agencies of our intended service levels, and our intention to continue cooperative service arrangements. SCOPE The Public Services Plan is an integral part of Orono's Community Management Plan. The policy decisions relating to Orono's public service requirements complement and balance regional plans with local concerns for historic development patterns, environmental protection, fiscal responsibility and general land use. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4D, Page 2 CMP Part 4D. Public Services Plan PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICES POLICE SERVICES Orono has had an independent police force since 1962. The Police Department operates out of headquarters facilities located in the City administrative complex on Ola Crystal Bay Roo NorthKelley Parkway. Orono Police currently provide contract services to the citizens of Long Lake, Spring Park, Minnetonka Beach, and Mound. Police Service Goals 1. To create and maintain a feeling of security in the community. 2. To reduce the opportunity for the commission of crimes. 3. To aid individuals having medical emergencies or who are in danger of physical harm, and to assist those who cannot care for themselves. 4. To identify criminal offenders and criminal activity and, where appropriate, to apprehend offenders and participate in subsequent court proceedings. 5. To resolve conflict. 6. To protect constitutional guarantees and to promote and preserve civil order. 7. To identify potentially serious law enforcement problems. 8. To facilitate the efficient and hazard -free movement of people and vehicles. 9. To achieve the above goals within the financial capabilities of the City and its citizens. Police Service Policies In order to achieve the stated Police Service Goals, the Orono Police Department will be operated and administered according to the following policies: A basic level of routine police services will be provided to all citizens within the department's jurisdiction. The level of routine services provided in the Rural Area is not to be as extensive or as frequent as that level necessary in the more densely developed urban neighborhoods. 2. Twenty-four (24) hour emergency response will be provided to all citizens within the department's jurisdiction. 3. Orono will participate in active mutual aid arrangements with police departments in adjoining jurisdictions. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4D, Page 3 CMP Part 4D. Public Services Plan 4. Orono will rely on technical support from other agencies including the Hennepin County Sheriffs Office. 5. Orono will embrace the "Community Oriented Policing" concept. 6. The Orono Police Reserve program will continue. 7. Orono expects to continue contract services with adjoining municipalities. Police Service Plans Orono intends to continue operation of the Orono Police Department and provide contract services to adjacent municipalities consistent with their desires. The size and abilities of the Department will be consistent with and dependent upon the land use type and density within the Department's jurisdiction. Police department funding, including contract service costs, will be based upon the level of service desired. FIRE SERVICES Fire protection services in Orono are contracted with the Long Lake Fire Department. Fire Service Goals 1. To encourage fire prevention practices. 2. To provide fire protection and fire suppression services. 3. To provide reasonable levels of total fire services within the financial capabilities of the City and its citizens. Fire Service Policies In order to achieve reasonable levels of fire protection for Orono citizens, the City expects to provide and administer fire services according to the following policies: 1. Fire prevention is the first step toward reduction in fire loss damages. The City has adopted and will enforce the State Fire Code (which incorporates the provisions of the National Fire Protection Association Code). 2. A basic level of fire protection services will be provided consistent with land use type and density. Urban areas will be expected to require more frequent fire services and more extensive fire services than that necessary in rural areas. Fire protection levels will be expected to be higher where municipal water is available than where water supplies must be transported to the scene. 3. Each of the contracting fire departments will be expected to provide all necessary administration, equipment and manpower to provide adequate service within their district. Each of the two contracting fire departments is a municipally -operated volunteer fire department. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4D, Page 4 CMP Part 4D. Public Services Plan 4. Orono expects to contribute its fair share of fire department expenses. Both fire protection contracts are written with the respective municipality and not directly with the fire department. Orono will expect to contribute its fair share of the costs of equipping and operating each fire department in comparison to Orono's relative service requirements. Fire Service Plans Orono intends to continue contracting for fire services from Long Lake. Land use type or density in areas not provided with municipal water will not be increased beyond the capability of rural water -hauling fire tactics. PUBLIC EDUCATION Orono is served by four local School Districts in addition to a number of private elementary and pre- schools, a private charter school, and a privately operated art center which provides nationally recognized art education to the public. Orono's four local school districts serve geographic areas of the City as indicated on Map 4D-1. Each of the four districts provides its own full service program of educational services for grades Kindergarten through Twelve, plus special education, recreation and community service programs. Each District is operated independent of the City by a separately elected School Board. Each District provides and manages its own student transportation services. And, since each District has its own tax powers, there mayi-s-be ee ffs;ao,.abk difference in total property tax mill levy between different neighborhoods in the City. Minnetonka School District No. 276, This School District has the smallest area of the City within its borders serving only the two small sections of Big Island. The odd arrangement of this boundary dates back to some of the former township realignments in 1868 and 1889. It is doubtful that any Minnetonka students actually reside in Orono as only seasonal cottages are located on these portions of the island. Westonka School District No. 277. This School District includes all of the Navarre Area, the major portion of Orono's Urban Service Area, and a small amount of rural land on our western border. All Orono students within the district are now bused to their classrooms in Mound or Minnetrista: Mound Westonka High School, Sunnyfield Road, Minnetrista (Grades 8-12) Grandview Middle School, Commerce Boulevard, Mound (Grades 5-7) Shirley Hills Primary School, Wilshire Blvd., Mound (Grades pre -K - 4) Hilltop Primary School, Game Farm Road, Minnetrista (Grades pre -K - 4). Westonka Schools have continually pgraded facilities, most recently a new performing arts center and an athletic and recreation center. Most of Orono's land area within District 277 is fully developed and urbanized with very little potential for major population increase. Many homes in this area are eeettpied by older- per -sons whose families hav-e City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4D, Page 5 CMP Part 4D. Public Services Plan Orono School District No. 278. This School District includes more of Orono's land area than all other districts combined. Most of this District is within Orono's Rural Area where total planned density is relatively low. However, this is also where most of Orono's remaining development will occur. Therefore, student population from this area of Orono is likely to remain steady or slightly increase over the next 10- 20 years. Because of the low land use density and the distances involved, almost all Orono students are now bused or driven to their classrooms on the Orono campus located on Old Crystal Bay Road between County Road 6 and Wayzata Boulevard. Included in this facility are: Orono High School, 795 Old Crystal Bay Rd. N. (Grades 9-12) Orono Middle School, 800 Old Crystal Bay Rd. N. (Grades 6-8) Orono Intermediate School, 685 Old Crystal Bay Rd. N. (Grades 3-5) Schumann Elementary School, 765 Old Crystal Bay Rd. N. (Grades K-2) The Orono Schools have continually upgraded facilities in Orono, including a high sehee' . adit^,.;,,m i 1991, the Link between the Middle Sehool and Sehuma-mi Eieffientafy in 1990, and a new High Sehee! media eenter- in 2000. The new Middle Seheel opened in the fall of 2000, expanding the sehool's eampus to the east side of Old Crystal Bay R a field house completed during the winter of 2018-19. The Cuty and School District partners toward the improvement of Old Crystal Bay Road with consolidated accesses and dedicated turn lanes to increasetraffic flow and pedestrian safety elose Old Q-ystal Bay Road as a resttit of this expansion. Orono does plan to study the etifFent sehool and City f4eilifies driveway aeeess layatA along Old Gfystal Bay Read to detefffline whether- a fner-e effieient and safe aeeess system ean be established. The City has ample municipal water supply to serve the Orono Schools facilities. Orono's municipal sewer capacity downstream from the school campus is currently adequate to accommodate all known planned school facility needs. Wayzata School District No. 284. This School District includes a small section of Orono's eastern edge including fully developed neighborhoods within the Urban Area and some homes in the Rural Area. A significant portion of this District's Orono land area is within the Wayzata Country Club's golf course or within the DNR's Wood Rill Scientific and Natural Area. Because of these long term land uses, and the low density planned rural land use, the potential for student population from this portion of Orono is very limited. Compared with the major increases in population occurring in this District in Plymouth, any change in Orono student population would be insignificant. Under current zoning, approximately 125 households in Orono will ultimately be served by Wayzata Schools. All Orono students are bused to classrooms in Wayzata or Plymouth. Facilities used by Orono students include: Wayzata High School, Peony Lane, Plymouth (Grades 9-12) Wayzata West Middle School, Barry Avenue, Wayzata (Grades 6-8) Gleason Lake Elementary, County Road 101, Plymouth (Grades K-5) None of these facilities are expected to be closed in the future. Any new facilities will likely be constructed in Plymouth where major population increases are occurring. Since no school facilities are located in City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4D, Page 6 CMP Part 4D. Public Services Plan Orono, Orono's facilities plans have no direct impact on District 284. The Minnetonka Center for Arts and Education offers instruction and facilities for all forms of artistic expression. The Art Center was established in the early 1970's as a local, privately operated place for artistic endeavors. Since that time, facilities have been provided for all -forms of education and hands- on art experience. The Art Center is privately operated and privately financed, but enrollment is open to all. Many Orono residents are active participants as are persons from the entire metropolitan area. Orono residents have ready access to all metropolitan educational facilities. Orono is within daily commuting distance of all the many educational institutions in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area including the University of Minnesota, community colleges, vocational schools and many private colleges, universities and specialty schools. This ready availability amply supplements the schools and institutions located within our borders. Public Education Policies The City will take no direct role in determining educational needs. This is the responsibility of the separate school districts. 2. The City will encourage coordination of facilities and programs between those districts serving Orono. Orono and surrounding communities have limited populations and limited taxation capabilities. The City will encourage all reasonable forms of cooperation between school districts so as to avoid unnecessary duplication of staff or facilities. The City will coordinate community service programs with the school districts. Although each is administered separately, the City and School Districts are used and financed by the same citizens. It is only reasonable to expect cooperation so that improved community services such as recreation programs will be able to utilize available facilities and talents without duplication of effort or cost. Public Education Plans Orono's projected slow rate of population growth should not require the provision of any new educational facilities in any of the four local school districts, other than those facilities already planned. Orono's public facilities plans have no impact on the Wayzata, Minnetonka or Westonka School Districts because they have no facilities located in Orono. GOVERNMENT AGENCIES AND SERVICES This Section provides a brief review of the several public agencies that have jurisdiction over certain subjects in Orono, and a review of special services which have direct benefit to many Orono residents. A review of these subjects is not a mandated element of regional planning, but their inclusion in this CMP is indicative of their relationship to environmental conditions and land use planning. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4D, Page 7 CMP Part 4D. Public Services Plan U. S. POSTAL SERVICE Addresses within Orono are tied to one of 5 different zip codes. There is no unique zip code for Orono. The lack of a single post office serving the entire City has long been a point of discussion among residents who may, for instance, live in the City of Orono, have children attending the Mound Schools, and have a mailing address of Wayzata, Excelsior or Mound. 55356 Lf_ on 55364Y' f ♦S r� S ... SbOfE'J'f6Dd CZq1�141 Figure 4D-1 zip codes Postal Service Goal To have the U.S. Postal Service allow the use of the City name "Orono" with the appropriate post office zip code, which will lend cohesiveness and identity to our community. Postal Service Policy Orono will encourage the Postal Service to establish a separate "Orono" zip code or to utilize one of the existing rural route zip codes, combined with the use of "Orono, Minnesota", as the City address. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4D, Page 8 CMP Part 4D. Public Services Plan PRIVATELY OPERATED UTILITIES AND SERVICES Citizens and properties in Orono are provided with power and communication services by public utility companies operating under public regulation and franchise. Sanitation services are provided by private haulers operating under license from the City. As in other elements of the CMP, the availability of service levels varies between the urban and rural portions of the City. In addition, electricity and telephone service districts are each divided between two different utility companies making coordination with City officials and City policy more involved than if only one company were involved. Electrical Service Electrical service is provided in Orono by two separate utilities. Northern States Power (NSP) provides service to most of Orono with local offices in Shorewood. Wright -Hennepin Co-op Electric Association, with offices in Rockford, provides service to a few properties in northern and northwestern Orono. The service areas are divided as shown on Map 4D-2. Cable Television & Communication Service Orono is provided with cable television service by Mediacom, the franchise holder which currently owns and maintains the cable television infrastructure in the Lake Minnetonka area. Not all homes in Orono are currently provided with cable service, which relies on a minimum level of residential development density in order to financially justify the infrastructure costs. Local programming and franchise administration are under the auspices of the Lake Minnetonka Cable Commission (LMCC), a joint powers organization consisting of 17 of the smaller cities around Lake Minnetonka. In terms of franchise administration, the LMCC controls rates on basic service, reviews technical standards and compliance, ensures that the cable operator is meeting the needs of the community in customer service, and provides quality television production facilities and training for the local communities. In terms of local programming, LMCC operates a television production studio in Spring Park and generates local programming which is broadcast over two local access channels. A total of four channels are dedicated to local Public, Educational and Governmental programming ("PEG Access"). Private Utility & Sanitation Service Goal To provide all citizens and all areas of the City with adequate levels of service in the most economical manner possible consistent with Orono's urban -rural land use plans. Sanitation Policies Each resident will be responsible for his own sanitation requirements. The City will require by ordinance that all residents individually contract with a licensed hauler for regular pickup and removal of all garbage, trash, and rubbish. 2. Licensed haulers will be responsible for all administrative requirements including arranging for their own disposal sites. Rates, routes and schedules shall be determined by the hauler. Locating an approved disposal site and paying City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4D, Page 9 CMP Part 4D. Public Services Plan all disposal costs shall be the responsibility of the hauler. 3. The City will encourage all recycling and resource recovery activities. Too much solid waste is being generated by all citizens. The City will encourage conservation measures by the citizens, by the haulers, by independent operators and by all levels of government. The City will encourage returnable bottles and cans and a general reduction in the volume of packaging materials. The City will encourage organics recycling. 4. The City will encourage neighborhood clean-up campaigns. At least once a year, the City will provide a local disposal site for trash and debris to encourage a general housecleaning and city-wide spruce -up of back yards, road sides, and vacant lots. Sanitation Plans 1. The City will continue the practice of private sanitation and haulage without direct public involvement in this activity. 2. The City will investigate the establishment of a recycling center or facility within Orono to encourage energy conservation and reduction in solid waste generation. 3. The City will participate with Hennepin County and other municipalities to find alternative waste disposal solutions. Management Of -of Utility Conduits Private Utility Policies 1. Utility placement will be permitted in public rights-of-way. 2. The City will require dedication of appropriate utility easements in all new subdivisions. 3. The City will require that utilities provided to new developments be placed underground whenever feasible. 4. The provision of utilities to new developments will be a private responsibility and will not be coordinated by the City nor provided with any public financial support. Utility regulation, including rate charges, shall be by the State Public Service Commission and shall not be by the City. The City will not intervene in any problems or complaints between customers and private utility companies. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4D, Page 10 CMP Part 4D. Public Services Plan 6. No private utility connection permits will be required from the City except that street opening permits will be required whenever a utility excavates within any public street right-of-way. CITY OWNED LAND, RIGHTS, AND EASEMENTS City Owned Easements The City has equitable interest in various types of easements across privately owned property throughout the City. The underlying property owner retains fee title to the property, but his use is limited in various ways according to terms of the particular easement. The City's rights are strictly limited to the purposes and conditions of the particular easement. These easements are described below according to their intended purpose: Underlying Road Easements. The Transportation Plan includes provisions for privately owned and maintained roads particularly in the rural area. In all cases where private roads are allowed, the City will as a condition of the subdivision require dedication and recording of a permanent underlying public ingress, egress and access easement. These easements will ensure legal access of the public to all properties served by the private road. Further, the City will by ordinance and easement conditions, guarantee that all private roads are maintained to City standards at all times through required maintenance agreements and/or homeowner's associations, and that failure of the private group to so maintain their private road will be cause for the City to accomplish needed maintenance and to assess the benefited properties for the direct cost of such maintenance. The existence of these easements will not in and of itself indicate any intention of the City to acquire and/or to regularly maintain the subject private roads, but only provides a legal contingency to assure general public -safety as well as public access to all building sites. Utility Easements. The City will as much as possible locate all public utilities on publicly owned rights-of-way. Particularly in the case of sewer lines, however, this is not always feasible in Orono's hilly terrain. The need for gravity flow often requires a sewer location to run across private properties, quite often between the homes and the lakeshore. In these instances, the City will acquire permanent utility easements to allow such placement and to permit regular maintenance activities to occur. The typical easement is at least 10 and does preclude any temporary or permanent construction over the sewer route. The existence of these underground utilities and the appurtenant easement seldom affects the appearance or use of the property, other than the construction limitation. In addition to the above, all new subdivisions are required to include platted, dedicated public "drainage and utility" easements along most lot lines to facilitate lot drainage and the installation of utilities such as sewer, water, power and telephone without the need for separate legal instruments. Drainage Easements. As in the case of utility easements, the City's topography often has resulted in natural drainageways running over privately owned property. Non -obstruction of the natural City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4D, Page 11 CMP Part 4D. Public Services Plan drainage system is protected by our local environmental ordinances because such natural systems often are not covered by legal easements. Drainage easements are utilized where the City has constructed and/or maintains a storm drainage system across private property. These easements do legally record the non -obstruction requirements as well as provide for City maintenance access. In addition, all new subdivisions are required to include platted, dedicated public "drainage easements" along all natural creeks and drainageways and over all designated marshland or wetland. Flowage & Conservation Easements and Covenants for Wetland and Wetland Buffer Protection. Orono's Environmental Preservation and Surface Water Management Plans, as well as certain City Ordinances, have identified and designated wetlands, marshland and flood plains throughout the City that are to be permanently protected and preserved from encroachment or alteration. Whenever land containing such features is subdivided or developed, the City will require the land owner to dedicate a permanent flowage and conservation easement to the City over the affected portion of his land. Open Space Easements. In certain development situations, the City may have particular interest in permanently precluding certain types of improvements or in permanently protecting views or natural conditions or otherwise private property. This protection may be in return for allowing use or development of other areas of the property. In these circumstances, the City will require dedication of a permanent open space easement identifying the protected area and describing permitted and on -permitted uses or alterations. Open space easements may be temporary or permanent depending upon the circumstance. Open space easements will be filed in the chain of title of the subject property. Trail Easements. In locations where the City trail system has been or will be constructed, a Trail Easement will be acquired, either at the time property is subdivided (often as part of the required Park Dedication associated with land development) or via purchase or other means. Trail easements will be filed on the chain of title of the property, and will allow the use of the land by the City for the construction of a trail and permanent access by the public. TAX FORFEITED LANDS Many areas of Orono were platted and partially developed as much as 100 years ago, often into extremely small parcels. Many of these lots have never been developed because of their size, location or, often, because they are wetlands. They are not separately buildable because of land use and environmental constraints. Consequently, there are a number of lots that have been forfeited for non-payment of real estate taxes and for which title is held by the State of Minnesota. The City of Orono does not encourage tax forfeiture, but likewise the City will not permit use of extremely substandard or environmentally protected lands. Where tax forfeited lots exist, the City will pursue the following policies: I. Encourage purchase by adjacent land owners for inclusion with their properties, City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4D, Page 12 CMP Part 4D. Public Services Plan normally requiring legal combination of the tax forfeit parcel with the adjacent land. 2. Encourage sale and private development of those parcels large enough to accommodate an occupancy consistent with the City's land use plans and zoning performance standards particularly where they can be used for low and moderate income housing pursuant to the Housing Plan. Review and acquire for park purposes lots or larger parcels of sufficient size and location to be used for neighborhood mini -parks or play areas, or which are adjacent to and would be an appropriate addition to existing park or open space lands. 4. Review and acquire for flowage and conservation purposes those lots totally or significantly covered by marshland or wetland or which would have value for the City's surface water management system. COORDINATION WITH ADJOINING MUNICIPALITES The City of Orono has a long history of collaboration with the many municipalities who share its borders. This is illustrated by existing and ongoing shared services such as municipal sewer and water interconnections, building inspection services, police and fire department services, etc. Orono remains supportive of continued cooperation with adjoining municipalities in the provision of public services, and will work together with its neighbors on matters of common interest. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4D, Page 13 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN Cl) co a, Turner Road � o o '�W Drake Dr boa Painter W Branch Road Sunnyfield Road E a m 0 L m Game Farm Road E Dutch Lake 0 Moline Road 0. CL 19N Jenning's Bay Harrison Bay Legend e City Limits Lakes & Ponds 1� +t 2040 MUSA Rivers & Streams Yi 0 3,500 Feet Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT 12 Katrina Lake v Lake Classenift s�- v' Y Y Y Y Y Ro 1 I lei 1 4 ��► 1 Stubbs Y, A. Bav til hL Forest Lake 'Vc Arm III West III Arm 1 � P 16 r� Sprint j P j Bay School Districts BOLTON November 2018 & M E N K Real People. Real Solutions. w LakeTeo%` �th-Av�; ? run , �� 19th Ave N 1 r1 G ♦ 2 x a 3 La c , ♦ ng HiII �o d Z o Lydiard -Za` o a tile Y Ploy aQ pom` r, Lake . 0 ♦� a1 °' 0 s,�Ave� Y e� N 12 Daniels St �~ ; Y — ' 8th Ave N P!e 0 > OI w 1 1Li o y Ir. + Grand A OrcFiardib' e : �"►>�� r a�oh9�, 11�w v 4th Ave N a�ak',QO� 1�� Srd.AveN ♦ f ... �. . �- .1 ♦, 1 _ .. Wayzata Blvd W � Er �TYr Highw.aY 1 Y Y 1 it w jej 12 Rice ark StW?F St E aY2ata Blvd E _I �. 1 W Lake St E O m O Browns Pe Fac Wayzata v r Tanage Bay Bay ake V French Marsh 1 r � 1 1 Smith Bracketts Point 1 Crystal gohns .41 Bay Point 44 1 4+/1 w'w.w axe it Shoreline Dr 1 Lafayette the -- Bay Ca - Poi, 1 . M.M. Min a Highland`Av4 utledge Road Lire Road School Districts Minnetonka Orono Wayzata Westonka Map 4D-1 PI 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN Cl) 00 1 Turner Road a 4%7 O tr a M ��.�.• �. it -0 ♦ 0 �._� Drake Dr c � r 3 O U ` o U' ':" Gree j et i1 Q i 1 0 0 c 3 Moline Road Ow 0 ne 19N Painter Road i I� W Branch Road County Road 151 Sunnyfield Road E o Z c Jenning'_ Bay m 0 Game Farm RoadE c 0 Dutch U Lake m Harrison Bay Legend r • •� : City Limits 11 +t 2040 MUSA .i Lakes & Ponds Rivers & Streams 0 3,500 Feet Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT Electrical Service Areas November 2018 Katrina r` 12 Lake Moon -.. .. .... oma- ..-,...,........... ......- il�t .. Tro.G ! o Z ♦Arrr�r�� d ;r a r �' 0 ,♦`ong /-/ill t 1 z Suga � w �� 1• Z, AA I 0111 Z` - Kelley pksl .� ad p�m�.�.� • ♦fir .y 12 ..Daniels St a� orcFaiL'ne �a aw rd <Grand Av04 O %9fke1 11 � + 1000 o r t :� �aYsid I�i� ♦ 1 ay ��; 1 �� 1 .. Wayzata Blvd Wi e � 6 ado• 1♦1 •� c1°' 1���1 ♦� 12 1♦Cn 10w I Rice r 4' !.1 r1 !11= 1 Lakp_ 1E 1 w� P, j� 11 ' • 4%7 i �FoxSt�����r�����♦ a M ��.�.• �. it -0 ♦ 0 �._� � r �, ♦ 1 o U' ':" j i1 Shore r i 1 ��.�.�.��.�.�I� fit+ •i Shoreline Dr 5Jor <yric Lafayette A Ave Bay Sprint j �► �.� j 4. Qw r1001 ` n'� �•► V �o Wayzata Bay Ave J N. Minnetonka Blvd Highland Ave utledge Road ,re Road Electrical Service Areas Xcel Energy I�1 BOLT MENK Real People. Real Solutions. Z c J Ave N Wright -Hennepin CO-OP Map 4D-2 PI 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN Turner 26 1 �Paln{erR V W Branch Road Sunnyfield Road E a M 0 i� ad E Game Farm Ro Dutch Lake Legend City Limits 1� +t 2040 MUSA _i M co v to 0 c n 0 C 3 Moline Road m a 19N Z' r c Jenning Bay Harrison Bay Telephone Service Areas November 2018 Katrina I I I 12 eke III - N;�w 6IRR'- s _YYYYYYQ __ _ _ eve, •� 'j r O Z_ Y Y __ �■ ! - a' ` 1 o p r /n , Hillate` II Z Suga � :. _ 1 1 , Z g3 .' p J p41 °° I �a 0 Ze_10 . Kelley `Pkt�y■■•w �....plm�.... •v ° T mor _ :° 12 Da`ielsS{ �S"�i 1" ■_ j d 8th N •� . r ±� wA m _6 • Grand Av0rchard I n �:'� * OI y�°h �,w 10� 1 'LL -to++ �♦ &04y 1 `� - r. 1 dQ% Ri� 00 qA 110.0 m) �aysiae 1!�q, 1 0 ' •Y �1 O� Wayzata Blvd 1 4 rc � _ r r �Odry 1� 1 ♦w cy°' 1 _ _ 1 0 12 ark mill I f 1 Lake S E r .► 1 C (n t F oil PE rFo, St4%�10 q �a 1 T2s _ ♦,, �� P_erae�ca Wayzata >. _ Bay 0 Ice/ ` cis 0 i 1 Shore Or o 1 1 � j • 1 II !e: i Arm j Mir JQ ►ne 1 Shorey D� r`' L Yom. 011 1 g �� Lafayette 1, 4 Rutledge Road <yricAve L 19th] Ave e ,f A.yPar Telephone Service Areas 9� X10 Lakes & Ponds Rivers & Streams 0 3,500 Feet Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT Sp Frontier eay ,��,,. `off ���� _�._.�._.i._.Y._.a.�► j `♦ I�1 BOLT MENK Real People. Real Solutions. Ave N Century Link Map 4D-3 Z c J CMP Part 4E. Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces TABLE OF CONTENTS CMP PART 4E PARKS, OPEN SPACE AND TRAIL PLAN Introduction 2 Park Classification and Definitions 2 Table 4E 1 Parks Class cations and Definitions Existing Park, Open Space and Trail System Inventory 4 Table 4E-1-2 Parks Facilities 4 Table 4E-23 Regional Facilities 5 Table 4E-34 School Facilities 6 Table 4E-4-5 Lakes 6 Park System Needs Identification 7 Table 4E-56 Parks, Open Space and Trail Acreage by Classification 7 Park, Open Space and Trail Goals and Policies 8 Park, Open Space and Trail Action Plan 11 Table 4E-6-7 Big Island Implementation 12 Table 4E-78 Golf Course Implementation 13 Table 4E-81 Trail Implementation 14 E Map 4E-1 Parks and Trails Map Map 4E-2 Lake Access map Appendix Fi 4E -A. Park Details 4E-13 T n' -on �eeessoss U. int T _stir ark Classification and Definition 4E -C Lake Access types F-7 City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4E, Page 1 CMP Part 4E. Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces INTRODUCTION The provision of parks, open space areas and trails in Or -one is an essential quality of life element for the residents of the City. It is important for Orono to develop and implement a thoughtful strategy for meeting these needs in an efficient, economical manner. This Park, Open Space and Trail Plan is a refinement and restatement of the ongoing planning practice of the City of Orono. It respects and maintains the historic development patterns of the City. It continues many of the basic open space concepts established by the first organized comprehensive planning attempts in the mid 1960's, the 1974 Orono Village Comprehensive Guide Plan, and the 1980 Community Management Plan, the 2000-2020 CMP, and the 2010-2030 CMP. This Plan is prepared and presented for the following purposes: 1. To identify the recreation and open space needs of the City and its citizens. 2. To be a management tool for City officials, appointed commissions, City staff, and other parties involved in developing, maintaining, and managing recreational programs and city owned facilities in Orono. 3. Serve as the recreation open space element of our community management plan, designed to address and conform to all the applicable provisions of the Metropolitan Council's 2040 Regional Parks Policy Plan Table 4E 1 Park Classification and Definitions' Less th.. l in GoneentFatp'd or limitpd milp, radius ineor-porated into a development site, sueh as- sttel. A «e,. 4W i;#RnL1;1-«e..«e..ti......1 1/. t.. 1/_ ...:le -z 75 ,...«e.. Phys:e..l ..e....«,..31... suited for intense City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4E, Page 2 CMP Part 4E. Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces 'from Met council Parks Definitions City of Orono Definition RXIS 1I NG PARK, OFEN SPACE AND TRAIL SYSTEM INVENTORY City of Orono Facilities City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4E, Page 3 CMP Part 4E. Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces The City of Orono maintains over 260 acres of parks, trails and open space. The table below summarizes the types of parks and facilities available throughout the city system. Map 4E-1 Appendix Aillustrates ,.,.,,*airs a m ,p f the City parks, trails and recreation system. -and Appendix 4E -AF has detailed descriptions of each park. Table 4E-1 below summarizes mayor features of the Park system. Appendix 4E-13 includes a description of each park classification. -I" Table 4E-12 Cit of Orono Park Facilities m u V Qi y u V Q yR v w A F in en % � eC N •� ice. s. Park Acres `d `d C7 ' i '" V ° u 04 1 Notes Mini Livingston Tower Park 1 0.2 X Neighborhood Roberta Lee Antoine Park 1.3 X Crystal Bay Park 2.3 X X X X X X Navarre Playground 1.1 X X X X Community ulayfields Bederwood Park 9.05 X X X X X X X Hackberry 3.58 X X X X X X Casco Point Ice Rink 3.1 X X Community Parks Casco Point Park 8.5 X X French Creek Preserve 33.9 X X X X Saga Hill Preserve 28.9 X X X Big Island Nature Park 56.5 X X X X X Lowry Woods 14.1 X X Hi hwood Park 13.6 X X X Seven Nations Park 3.0 X X Pleasant View Park 1.2 X Lake Accesses There are 50 lake access point below are those capable of support recreation activities. A comprehensive list is at Appendix EMao 4E-2 and A endix 4E -C. Casco Point Beach (36) 0.3 x Lydiard Beach 0.7 X X Sandy Beach (19) 0.28 X Summit Park Beach 4.5 X X X Browns Bay Molly's 0.04 corner (la) X X 0.02 Winter Vehicular Shoreline at Spates (2 North Shore Drive at 0.04 Winter Vehicular Baldur Park Road (4) Crystal Bay Road (6) 0.04 Boating and bathing deeds for select parcels Gibbs Landing - Fox St. 0.04 Pedestrian year- round, vehicles X winter only Eastlake Street (10) 0.04 Winter Vehicular x Bayside Rd. at Stubbs 0.04 Winter Bay Rd. (11) snowmobiles access, Fishing X x X Dock Westlake Street (14) 0.04 Pedestrian X Access Park Lane (15) 0.04 X Fishing Dock City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4E, Page 4 CMP Part 4E. Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces Loma Linda Avenue (22) 0.04 X Fishing Dock Corral Road Extension (34) 0.04 X Pedestrian Access Ivy Lane (3 8) 0.04 X Pedestrian Access Spring Street (39) 0.04 X Pedestrian Access Carman Street (40) 0.04 X Fishing Dock Trails Ferndale Road 1.8 x Willow Drive 0.7 x CR 6 0.6 x Brown Road 0.7 x SlIecial Use Areas Orono Golf Course 45.6 X Golf , Winter Sledding and X- X X country Skiing Lurton Park 39 Off Leash Dog X X Park City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4E, Page 5 CMP Part 4E. Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces Regional Facilities There are numerous state and --regional parks, trails and open space facilities within Orono's boundaries. Table 4E-2 State or Regional Facilities —11 A encv Facifit Acres in Classification 7 Orono D Aif..,-.-;� T i]..Lv,- .�,.; .,«.,1 D.,,-1� Dojo, -.. o Morris T. Baker Regional Park Reserve 255 Existing Regional Park 62 Noerenberg Memorial Gardens 73 Existing Regional Park Three Rivers Lake Minnetonka Islands Regional Park 65.45 Existing Regional Park Dakot., Rail Regional Trail Lake Independence Trail 3 Existing Regional Trail ATafth Ar.« 1.a«.1;*.. Dakota Rail Regional Trail 30 Existing Regional Trail Welsf 1,1 Woods Soienti fie and N tUFal Aro., Wolsfeld Woods Scientific and Natural 40 Existing Scientific and Natural Area Area MnDNR Wood Rill Scientific and Natural Area 220 Existing Scientific and Natural Area Lake Luce Line State Trail 57 Existing State Trail School and Other Publicly Available Recreational Facilities Orono Schools The Orono School District campus on Old Crystal Bay Road North provides a wide range of facilities for school and community use, including tennis courts, football and soccer fields, baseball/softball, etc. Additionally, the school property is home to the Orono Ice City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4E, Page 6 Ager- rcA. ci-cs--iir Orono c- ThFee D;..or�ro D Aif..,-.-;� T i]..Lv,- .�,.; .,«.,1 D.,,-1� Dojo, -.. o �t Dr. Arthur Allen Wildlife Refi ge 62 Regional Park Reser. o Noerenberg-Memorial Gar -dens 7-3 independe ee Trail 3 Dakot., Rail Regional Trail -3 Regie��l Hennepin Ceufft-y ATafth Ar.« 1.a«.1;*.. 4-.5 7T � MnDN Welsf 1,1 Woods Soienti fie and N tUFal Aro., 40 rric Weed D;11 Sete tif4e «.1 Natural Are -2-M Regional P—ad* The r , e r ; o fai 6 Regi, «,.1 T�r.,;l Maxwell Bay rake A eeess 3-75 Lake Ferndale AAafA 4-6 Regi.%4 Park Reserve Dr;.,., ie Lakeview T v .. R rb 4.5 Community park LAB Lake Minuet„«v 4700.0 lie fg Long bake 21" School and Other Publicly Available Recreational Facilities Orono Schools The Orono School District campus on Old Crystal Bay Road North provides a wide range of facilities for school and community use, including tennis courts, football and soccer fields, baseball/softball, etc. Additionally, the school property is home to the Orono Ice City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4E, Page 6 CMP Part 4E. Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces Arena (developed by the Orono Hockey Boosters) and Lee Carlson Baseball Fields (developed by the Orono Baseball Association). Table 4E-34 School Facilities Facility Acres in Orono Classification Orono School Campus fields 20 Community Playfields Orono Ice Arena 4 Special Use Lee Carlson Baseball Fields 8 Community Play Fields Westonka Schools, Wayzata, and Minnetonka Schools. Westonka, Wayzata, and Minnetonka School Districts offers facilities for sports and recreation use, but are not listed here because those facilities are not located in the City of Orono. Private Parks Available to the General Public One of the most recent additions to the Orono Park roster his the Lakeview Legacy Park. The park is 4.5 acres of privately owned publicly available park land. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4E, Page 7 CMP Part 4E. Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces Lakes and Lake Access With more than 40 miles of Lake Minnetonka shoreline and nearly 5 miles of additional lake shorelines, Orono's lakes provide a significant recreational resource for all Orono residents. Lakes A defining characteristic of Orono is access to lake recreation opportunities. The two major lakes within the community are Lake Minnetonka which is managed by the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District and Long Lake which is shared between Long Lake and Orono. In addition to access that lake shore property owners enjoy the city maintains a number of lake access points. The DNR and Hennepin County each maintain boat lung ,.access points on Lake Minnetonka. Table 4E-4-5: Lakes Agency Facility Acres in Orono LMCD Lake Minnetonka 4,700 Orono/Long Lake Long Lake 221 Lake Access In order to provide lake access for the general public, as well as to provide for fire department access to the lake as a water source, a number of lake access corridors were created as the shore land developed. These typically are platted, dedicated right-of-ways leading from the local road system to the shoreline, and are commonly from 16' to 66' in width. The historic level of use of these right-of-ways (sometimes referred to as a fire lanes or lake access roads) ranges from minimal to year-round. A number Gei4ain of these corridors have been maintained by the City for local swimming beaches or as winter snowmobile and ice - fishing accesses. Certain accesses are provided with docks for fishing, and some have ramp areas suitable for launching a small boat. However, most do not have designated parking available, and are primarily intended to serve the neighborhood rather than the general public. A number of these access corridors have steep topography and experience a relatively low level of usage. Map 4E-2 shows Lake Access Point and Appendix x D ,,mains includes a complete listing of lake access points. Appendix 4E -C also includes a listing of lake access points. PARK SYSTEM NEEDS IDENTIFICATION At the present time, there are many parks and open space facilities located in the City of Orono. These recreation and open space facilities are primarily under City, State, Ceounty and Sschool District jurisdiction. Parks, Open Space and Trail Acreage by Classification Table 4E-5 Tl.below depicts the amount of park, trails and open space within the boundaries of Orono by type. The National Recreation and Parks Association recommends a minimum of 9.6 acres per 1000 population of available park land. Orono is well above this standard with 34.3 Acres of parkland per 1000 with just city maintained facilities. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4E, Page 8 CMP Part 4E. Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces Table 4E-56: Parks, Open Space and Trails Acreage by Classification (2018) Classification Acreage Acres per 1000 Mini -Parks 0.2 0.0 Neighborhood Parks 4.8 0.6 Community Playfields 12.6 1.6 Community Parks 160.0 20.6 Lake Access 6.4 0.8 Trails 3.9 0.5 Orono Special Use Areas 79.1 10.2 Other Orono Preserved Areas 0.0 City Subtotal 266.9 34.3 Regional Park 515 66.2 Regional Park Reserve 78 10.0 Special Use 77 9.9 Regional Trail 13 1.6 Lake Access 5 0.6 Community Play Fields 28 3.6 Community park 4.5 0.6 Regional, school and private public 720 92.5 Grand Total 986.9 126.8 Lakes 4921 632.1 Summary and Conclusions 2018 Citizen Park Survey To help inform this chapter the city conducted a parks, trails and open space survey. The results of the survey are available on the city website or by contacting the City Clerk. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4E, Page 9 CMP Part 4E. Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces PARK, OPEN SPA CE AND TRAIL GOALS AND POLICIES Orono's Park, Open Space and Trail Plan is based upon the following goals and Policies, which in turn are consistent with the other elements of Orono's Land Use a„' Community Management Plans: Goals To provide passive open space and active recreational opportunities to serve the needs and desires all residents. 2. To protect, preserve, restore and provide access to ecologically significant natural resource areas, wildlife habitats and open space. 3. To provide citywide bike and walking trails that provide connections between area parks, trails and open space and when possible function as a transportation corridors. 4. To identify, preserve and highlight areas of historical significance. 5. To maintain and increase access for all residents to the city's lake resources such as Lake Minnetonka and Long Lake. 6. To achieve the above goals within the financial capabilities of the City and its citizens by developing fiscal and management policies that support maintenance, development and acquisition of parks and open spaces. Policies 1. The city will maintain a Park Commission of appointed residents to continually assess and evaluate the current parks, trails and open spaces within Orono. (Supports goals 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) 2. The city will actively encourage civic involvement in developing and maintaining Orono's parks and open spaces through programs such as adopt a parks and park clean up days. (Supports goals 1, 2, 6) 3. The City will cooperate and actively work with public and private organizations to provide additional opportunities for recreation and open space that complement existing municipal, regional and private facilities. (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) 4. Orono will require land developers to provide for recreational space to serve all new deve ,.pm en -subdivisions. New developments that results in increased land use density will be required to include public dedication of lands necessary for additional parks, playgrounds, bike -hike trails and open space or will be required to contribute funds for the municipal purchase, of such lands or improvement of existing recreation facilities proportionate to the cumulative effect of such density increase. (Supports goals 1, 2, 3, 6) City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4E, Page 10 CMP Part 4E. Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces 5. Orono will encourage the preservation and protection of natural recreational and open space amenities including lakes, marshland, wetlands, and natural woodlands on private lands though open space through conservation easements, private donations, land trusts and other preservation methods that allow the private sector to play role in preservation of open spaces. (Supports goals 2, 6) 6. Orono will coordinate with other jurisdictions, agencies and non-profit organizations in the provision of sufficient active recreation facilities and programs to meet the needs of the community. Orono will actively encourage all school districts to coordinate their programs and facilities and to open them to the public whenever feasible. Orono will actively support and cooperate with the Orono and Mound-Westonka School Districts in their community service recreation programs. The City will encourage planning for organized team sports on a community/sub-regional basis. Orono will work with public or non-profit groups to fund the acquisition and development of recreational and open space lands and facilities. (Supports Goals 1, 4, 5) 7. Orono will strive toward connectivity between the various park and open space facilities. The interrelationships between neighborhood parks, conservation areas and the rest of the park system should be strengthened through the proper location and use of green ways, trails, underpasses and overpasses. Trail connections should be provided to neighborhood parks to enable pedestrian access. Trail corridors / easements will be incorporated at the edge of subdivisions and adjacent to major roadways. (Supports goal 3) 8. Orono will acquire additional public open space parcels as opportunities arise. The priority for any acquisitions will be for ecologically significant lands that abut existing park land, land that provides improved access to existing parkland and trails or land that facilitates the development of the planned trail system. (Supports goals 2, 5, 6) 9. The City's park dedication fund will be used for purchase of additional park land and/or for improvement of existing park land. Consistent with Minnesota Statutes, this fund will not be used for park maintenance or recreation operating expense. (Supports goal 6) 10. Where possible, recreational facilities will be designed to be barrier -free so that handicapped citizens have reasonable access to facilities. Orono will ensure that select new parks are constructed with accessibility in mind and to incorporate Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) design standards with projects to upgrade existing parks. (Supports goals 1, 3, 5) 11. Orono will maintain Lake Access for all residents. With shore land abutting a dozen separate bays in Lake Minnetonka, Orono has a commitment to maintaining access via the dedicated access corridors. It is the City's intent to permanently retain for public use all existing lake access corridors and fire lanes, regardless of the current level of use or maintenance. (Supports goal 5) To this end, the City will follow these policies: —Requests for vacation of dedicated lake access right of ways will be evaluated carefully, in particular where equal or better lake accesses are not available nearby.RequAs fof ■ The City will identify and take necessary action to preserve the public's right to use of any City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4E, Page 11 CMP Part 4E. Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces such accesses which exist but which may not have been formally dedicated. ■ The City will endeavor to work with property owners adjacent to lake access corridors to ensure that both the rights of the public and the rights of the private landowner are upheld. 12. The city will conduct a periodic (10 year cycle) park usage and needs community wide survey to determine if residents' needs are being met. (Supports goal 1) 13. The city will review the existing park and facilities conditions to identify needed maintenance upgrades and replacements. 14. The city will provide sufficient funding for the administration and maintenance of the existing parks, trials and open space system as part of the regular City budget levy. Other sources of park funding such as development park fees, grants, support from local organizations, private donations, will be used for acquisitions, capital improvements and major renovations. (Supports goal 6) City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4E, Page 12 CMP Part 4E. Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces PARK, OPEN SPA CE AND TRAIL A CTION PLAN The following paragraphs describe how Orono intends to act on the goals and policies of the previous section. Park Commission The Orono Park Commission serves as an advisory body appointed by the City Council to make recommendations about park, open space and trail issues. The Park G,,,,..fflissio 's ,.,. ndffte as soy feAh in Mtmieipal Code Seetion 2.52 is to study and eensider- the eentinuing needs of the City-fef involving p4he use of bake Minnetonka and other- lakes in the City, a -ad pet4iens of its shor-eh The Park Com missi will continuously evaluate park, open space and trail facilities and community needs. This ongoing evaluation process allows for identification and prioritization of improvements; taking into account such factors as population growth, demographic changes, levels of facility use, health and safety factors, condition of facilities, special populations, adjacent land use compatibility, and life cycle recreation; invasive species removal and satisfaction of community needs. The Park Commission will monitor the parks, open space and trail systems to satisfactorily address the goals and policies of this plan. Focus Parks and Trails The Park Commission will focus on the following Park, trails, and recreational facilities. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4E, Page 13 CMP Part 4E. Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces Big island In order to achieve the level of management needed to operate Big Island Park successfully, the City and Minnehaha Creek Watershed district created and adopted the Big Island Nature Park Management Plan, November, 2011. The management plan contains a vision and a series of goals for the park. The specific bullet points require additional clarification and coordination with the Plan. The proposed Comprehensive Plan for Orono 2040 will be a three-phase process as outlined below: Table 4E-6-7: Big Island Implementation Phase L 1 This Phase will,focus on the making the park sae and accessible. • Clean up existing trails so they are passable for hiking. • Purchase and place a safe container for mowing and trail maintenance equipment. • Mow and maintain trails. • Establish controls for unauthorized use (snowmobiles) • Renovate existing structure (visitor center) • Evaluate Historical value • Create a plan to improve security. Phase II I This Phase willfocus on completing Goals in 2030 Comp Plan. • Establish a master plan for day use facilities, including but not limited to: bathrooms, shelter, viewing platform, picnic tables, historical marker, accessible paths, and a veteran's memorial flag. • Clarify the Natural and Recreational Areas in the conservation easement. • Re-evaluate the Management Plan together with the MCWD and make revisions as needed. • Construct day use facilities • Provide access for those who are physically disabled. • Conduct a process involving all possible stakeholders to create a long-term Vision. • Establish a true Vision for the Orono Big Island Park (what should it look like in the year 2040?) Phase III I This Phase willfocus on the long-term potential of the ark. • Create the partnerships required to implement the plan (MCWD, LMCD, surrounding cities, state of MN, Veterans groups, Three Rivers Park District, etc) • Create a phased approach to the vision (masterplan) • Seek and obtain funding. • Implement the plan. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4E, Page 14 CMP Part 4E. Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces Golf Course The city will look to secure the long term viability of the Municipal Golf course through a series of capital improvements focusing on both golf and alternative recreational activities on the site. In 2017 the city under took the development of a mini -master plan to lay out options for the park. Future projects may include: Table 4E-78 Golf Course Implementation Priority Project Description 1 Porch/ Patio Includes porch for clubhouse 2 Cart Parking Run concurrent with Porch project as the porch project eliminates current cart parking. Includes retaining wall and pavement for cart parking. 3 Fest Tent Area Leveling and clearing a 40'x60' area for placement of a fest tent to facilitate more events at the golf course 4 Fire Pit Natural gas fire pit area. 5 Lawn Bowling Project pending further analysis. Installation of a 30'x 120'2 lane lawn bowling facility 6 Snow Tubing Hill w/Tow Project pending further analysis. Installation of a tow rope and Rope procurement of snow tubes. 7 Multi -Use Trail Project pending further analysis. Installation of a perimeter multiuse trail at the golf course. Annual Focus Parks In addition to specific City initiatives or activities supporting Big Island and the Orono Golf Course, the Park Commission will designate one or two of its Parks each year for special consideration as "Focus Parks". In addition to normal maintenance activities, Focus Parks (neighborhood or community, recreational or natural) will be evaluated from a broader perspective, including potential capital investment. Examples for consideration could be: ■ Are there additional opportunities to increase use of the park (e.g. new trails or recreational facilities)? ■ Are special ecological or historical features of the park effectively featured? ■ Could the park benefit from more extensive removal of invasive species? ■ Are directional signs to the park and within the park adequate? ■ Are parking facilities appropriate for existing and proposed uses for the park? When designating a Focus Park, the Commission will also seek input from surrounding residents who could be impacted by changes in park use or investment. Recent examples of Focus Park designation included the conversion of the Susan E. Lurton Nature Area to include an off -leash dog park (2016-2017), extensive removal of invasive species, trail widening, new signage and benches at Saga Hill Nature Area (2017-2018), and potential new uses and improvements at Bederwood Community Park (2018-2019). City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4E, Page 15 CMP Part 4E. Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces Trails The City recognizes that search areas for extensions to the Dakota Rail and the Lake Independence Trails are located, in part, within City of Orono boundaries. The city supports extensions and connections to these features where extensions can be made while being sensitive to environmental features. Map 4A- 6 shows the locations of all trails, and planned areas for expansion. Table 4E-89: Trail Implementation JL I Priority Project Description 1 County Road The city does not support an the -planned -on -street trail on County Road 15 due 15 West of to its close proximity to Dakota trail. Navarre 2 Navarre The city will actively partner with Hennepin county and Three Rivers park Dakota Trail District to complete a trail connection along County Road 19 cEonnecting Connection Navarre to the Dakota Trail 3 Old Crystal The city will supporter an off-street trail that provides access from the Luce Bay Road Line Trail at Old Crystal Bay Road to the Dakota Trail at North Shore Drive. 4 Wayzata Blvd The City is partnering with the city of Long Lake and Hennepin County to Trail provide a multi modal trail along the north side of Wayzata Blvd from the Luce Line trial to the western Boundary of the Orono School Property. The trail is being included as part of the CSAH 112 Turn back Projects. 5 Lakeview The city will plan a trail that connects Lakeview Legacy Park to the County Legacy Park Road 19 trail as well as trails to the south that connect with the Dakota trail. 6 Hunter The city will partner with the Hennepin County to connect the trails in northeast Drive/Ferndale Orono to the Luce Line and Dakota Trails via Hunter Drive and Ferndale Road. 7 Lowry Woods The city will plan trail access to the Lowry Woods Park. 8 Old Long Lake The city does not support the addition of an off-street trail along Old Long Lake Road Road due to the nearby access to the Luce Line Trail in several locations. RESOURCING Operating and Maintenance Budget The City shall remain committed to fully funding the operations and maintenance needs of the City's parks, trails and open space system. - The majority of the resourcing will come from the General Fund Levy. The golf course and Lurton off Leash Park have separate funding sources for maintenance. The golf course is funded through greens fees and the off leash dog park through a combination the Lurton Park Fund and annual permit fees. Capital Improvement Plan The City manages capital expenditures at parks as part of the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The CIP provides long-term planning and management of infrastructure throughout the City. The CIP is a planning document that presents a 5+ year overview of scheduled capital projects to address the City's goals for public infrastructure. The CIP includes a long-term financing plan that allows the City to allocate funds for these projects based on assigned priorities. The 5+ year horizon of the CIP provides the City with an opportunity to evaluate project priorities annually and to adjust the timing, scope and cost of projects as new information becomes available. The information contained in this plan represents an estimate of improvement costs based on present knowledge and expected conditions. Changes in community priorities, infrastructure condition and inflation rates require that adjustments be made on a routine basis. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4E, Page 16 CMP Part 4E. Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces Funding for Acquisition and Capital Improvements As Orono becomes fully developed over the next two decades, the amount of money collected via new development park dedication fees will decrease substantially. Funding for the acquisition of park lands and for improvement of existing facilities will require alternative sources of capital in the future. The City will continue to investigate mechanisms for future funding and will continue to encourage private donations of land or funds in order to maintain the level of active and passive recreation opportunities desired by Orono residents. Orono currently provides funding for park, open space and trail acquisitions and improvements by the following methods: Mandatory developer contributions of land or cash payments to the Park Dedication Fund at the time property is subdivided or developed; transfers from the City's general fund; private contributions of land or funds; fees for use; and grants. U -,e e -a Size Site A ttt.ibtA" Le� /'once«Re.. 1,...,1.1..«,1., r F ...,.1 ., 1: 1. Am.T..«:, :«..1:� V_fiab 1.....ed 1�T..�......1«,...,.....ees that .....efi ««,...,.«....�ien an, i-sea�natccaia--crc�axrtV Siter�aS 11,,.te«,.,.11«..es ..«a 1.1etle«a., that .,«e enexwnt—ar that .. ,.,.la l e Ee11atV Bf feSeHF6e Cl^.�-cclopl'„ benefits tot ;tee eerier=1?✓r—aad/er state l.e..,.....e of tl.e ., tel erF ,.t,. of ,7 e. el,....«e«t t LoeellT n«ve ,7e, eln«e,7 for onpe .n;Rre A Eentained On or ,.rr «,..a ♦«vile O;At ,.,7e ,.F«,. ,.1 t e1 -11hbethe :tl.: � tee.,, seenie afeas whileasswinL- tl.e trail .,.1...., hiking biking. ......ex.:li '7nvr�cvciax«e/ ..1.::« t«ee,7....... has « ,.,7..e«..e eFF et a tl.e 11,.«.e1...,.Leaneeine and a«: x ake-� Pwse e«ee,. ««e..:,le ,.eves to lakes f « 3--5 e Deyelai3ed�..«, eyelef3,.,l ..>�oF ams swimming. beatiM 4iAi«,. .. ......1.:1:..,. ....1L:...,...1.::i.«.. ds -BF -BHB snewsheeine and winter whiettlaf lake fteeesl- C-GlInt . l:«e..« «..«l n«ve ,7e.,eWe,7 c r onpemRme RT ce..e« 1 m« ..e« e n« er ,.rr «, ad t«,.:/ t1 .,t « e,7e eF«e ,.1 t e1 dndA�F effneFe t..e. vseenieafeaswhileass tl.e e:1 siish s 1.:1.. hiki gnawmebilinp #eadwy has-flo ,.,1. e e eFF ,. n tl.e Fainin3Hii-- V.3tV cc« el�a— n.. N... i rtE tv-�*affietslar apE ..1 alien €eatuFe nta:«t :« «a« :,7e �� gnspialiv'Ao,.lT..«« � tl+e « e :..1 «e e « F et1.«e and tx.e ,. erell nese to de 1 Flss 3tee A «e.. ,.F..et..«..1 a emamental .al t. 25 tin ,. es AFC rds « «,.1 Feat.res .it «:,,,7 Fe..t,lee«.-ee«eet: .el. a .e1L:«,. «L.....:..el ,. «1.:e in t D. -,..,:.«:t.. t :tti«,.iski4w.; ,.,.111,7 1 Avefa ,.:i:tie....«,7 « ffee&a«,7 /,.« some field and eeui4 eames. where Area ,.F« el ,. ofnamentel .. ,.1't . f& 280 500 aeres Ca «lee el .. badip.. Fir .,.te«,.,...««e.. ...1. a«e .ible as :eL:«,.. l..eeti«,. F...x.: xxn,e_e « .-,.l «esetifee eeeufs i3aAieularW v ateF Regi—al p?s'«k A «ve ..F «..t..«.1 ...1:t. F nature 1 nnn.i ,. a «ems«�St 5}tEb—$S n3SeFVee6eioed .t,7,. rPOreatioR stiel. as- ..itn- T t,.«e,.« «L... lakes. «..l.e � studstudvinp nattwa, wildlife ama fitun a. A'Wh Ira] haNtat, sonseFYu~e SWii3ieftie ,.L:« h"ne. be City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4E, Page 17 CMP Part 4E. Parks, Trails, and Open Spaces 'from Met council Parks Definitions 'City of Orono Definition City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 4E, Page 18 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN Legend e •r : City Limits 2040 MUSA 0 3,500 Feet Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, Hennepin County, MnDOT c 1 Moline Road ;�-® 0 o :Q L_ 26 Painter µoad Parks and Trails Regional Trails Other Trails Dakota Rail a�/ Off -Street Regional Trail 4 Rutledge and Facilities Regional Trails Lake Marsh On -Street Independence ` Regional Trail Off -Street, m°op Planned Lake 2040 System Private \ Public Lake Minnetonka LRT a ti On -Street, Regional Trail '*�,#.'�� Planned Luce Line State ° Local Sidewalks Trail •' • �� & Trails Regional Trail Orono Parks Search Corridors 1 i OAO Parks and Trails November 2018 Kairina � ` o0 Way 12 Lake d Moon _?atae,� - _s..----•--•�G_ _ .._.._. ,._.._.._.._.._ ��.._.._ a TO o f- ■ G r ° Dickewo 'V q�e N 1 ke 3 Lake c -Prin��* Pve N o i (—'m �,ydiard Z� rO jo Long Lake c o e)a _••• , * • Lake �• a z T �► m e� H 1 2 Daniels St ' 1 I ° G m �' Orcha Wayzata Blvd w u. Grand Ave -• �a�Ln 1 wn ROaa N� O I o Stubbs 3 ;ghorelinelDr� ell,_ �y� • ale'. Bay m Fox St In. h_,,geY Ln 6 m ° L..�si zi � • qe p� Amy T al Northd °O ! Fernaaie Road We' °e d Arm anager Ba; o,Q ll iN L k o axwe `�`. ° �, M Regional Parks O�Ja - ' • • • Bay � � French a�/ 1 0 4 Rutledge and Facilities Regional Trails Forest Marsh _lyric Ave - — - • — • • — Bay .'�• ` - d m°op �•• .� 2040 System Private \ Public Lake a ti 1 F in g,-. 1 Additions Park Q � ° e � � •' • �� �• pJQ'/ Lakeview Orono Public Park Spring Carman'sr 1 i OAO 1 '' Schools • / e - � N Shore Dr, ° Bav 1 a" �• Open Water • j L 1 �a�° . raw Bracketts a9 Sod y _ . • ` `J `•. � • � • Point 1 �e d+� 1 West • "0 ♦ •' Bl -16 ° A`m Crystal ,• o� Bay P000, • . V2, .. .. .. :'`°to90 R a \ Arcot i 1 « W Arm Dr Northern Ave < eft oa �3A Regional Parks O�Ja - ' • • • •�( • �� ° ° . S0 ' ' Lafaye.. dfa`J to Q- 1 4 Rutledge and Facilities Regional Trails ase i ° _lyric Ave - — - • — • • — Bay .'�• fyrkake�Ave - d m°op �•• ° i• Pa q�e 2040 System Private \ Public �`_ ,RoaQ �.• rf` �•' Additions Park 'J e � � •' • �� �• pJQ'/ Lakeview Orono Public Park Spring Carman'sr ^. i OAO ♦•• Schools _ tonal Bay ° Bav y �� �• o Road Open Water qa L 1 �a�° . raw . _ .. _ .. _ .. _ .. Sod y _ . • ` `J Map 4E-1 Rq `• • ry Ja °T Island • ` 1 OR • �' Mnetonka ir/ • • � • . _ .. _ .. _ ��,a�``tO'' • Q° ` ergs 1j�, n°t 8th Ave N BOLTN I1 & MENK Real People. Real Solutions. Ave N ORONO PARK AND TRAIL SYSTEM 0-1 Casco Point Park 0-2 Casco Point Beach 0-3 Casco Point Ice Rink 0-4 Lydiard Beach 0-5 Livingston Tower Park 0-6 Antoine Park 0-7 Highwood Park 0-8 Sandy Beach 0-9 Summit Park Swimming Beach 0-10 Bederwood Park 0-11 Hackberry Park 0-12 Orono Golf Course 0-13 Seven Nations Park 0-14 Navarre Playground 0-15 Crystal Bay Playground 0-16 Lowry Woods 0-17 French Creek Preserve 0-18 Saga Hill Preserve 0-19 Pleasant View Park 0-20 Big Island Nature Park 0-21 Lurton Off -Leash Dog Park PRIVATE / PUBLIC PP -1 Lakeview Legacy Park NATURE CONSERVANCY NC -1 Ferndale Marsh ORONO SCHOOL SYSTEM FACILITIES S-1 Orono School System Facilities S-2 Lee Carlson Baseball Fields DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DNR -1 Luce Line Trail DNR -2 Wolsfeld Woods Nature Area DNR -3 Maxwell Bay Lake Access DNR -4 Wood Hill Scientific & Natural Area MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT MCWD-1 Wolsfeld Creek HENNEPIN COUNTY H-1 North Arm Boat Landing THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT 3R-1 Noerenberg Gardens 3R-2 Baker Park Reserve 3R-3 Lake Minnetonka Islands Regional Park 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN Legend o ;.w_y?ar e�� _,...,..._.... •L._s ....._.._.._. _.,� ._.._. _.. 8 - zID•�- a� �• 0, Jill City Limits 2040 MUSA _3:Dickeao, M. c�toad • _N • Lake Latae c Spring 0 3,500 I pve CI z o. • Feet rO o Lon -".Vl Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, Q-oaa -' ,� �., `• o MG Hennepin County, MnDOT ec � m ! -c GJ♦♦ Y Danielsibis ast • tI oQ�. �ao. Moline Road K M� °'� m Gra(nd A'OrcliardrLn W hza ;a Blvd !v � a. `m 0 19 N � Rod 6011 , Pai�oad Parks and Trails Regional Trails Other Trails Dakota Rail Off -Street Regional Trail Lake On -Street Independence Regional Trail Off -Street, Planned Lake Minnetonka LRT'��•� .� On -Street, Regional Trail ' Planned Luce Line State Local Sidewalk: Trail & Trails Regional Trail Orono Parks Search Corridors Regional Parks and Facilities Regional Trails - 2040 System Private \ Public Additions Park Orono Public Schools Open Water Map 4E-1 Parks and Trails November 2018 D Y Moonjj-�\ IN Ave [_ake 20� N T�o.D t 6 2 q�e H 1 Lydiard Z� Lake o lz 1C, 8th Ave N MW v12 J m � • a w1� r. o V Stubbs c o° shoreline Dr� Bay 3 s Q ` Fox St _ Aea,4eY Ln �� c•, e pt ��� Akwk' "� ��d • 4 Brown: Ferndale Road We w�... I anager Bay l ' 'PoN Maxwell iN ��. Lake 01 o• , French I E _ Marsh `•g Elm ° i ® e N Shore Dr • • Smith � • :' / � Bay Brackefts I •` s Point West o I �• ••�• ! Arm ••�•. ooa I �•• in �' ; •tipc • • i 1 wake I — .. _ .. _ .. _ �`°�( go Roa \ Arcola W Arm Dr Northern pve �afa`Jee 1 ••■ a••si _�yricAve- o. Bay • '\ 0°0• ♦ . Vo ; �6e RoaO, .. �• Spring /i • °DAO �•�•♦ Lakeview F Park Bay ► : ° Bay '.•� �• '\ ,: -_ o Sod Road y� �onaly rico ♦ ♦♦ J Islam` • • • • )inc, 1 �.,, _ `r %etonka BtJ01a BOLTN /1 & MENK Real People. Real Solutions. Ave N ORONO PARK AND TRAIL SYSTEM 0-1 Casco Point Park 0-2 Casco Point Beach 0-3 Casco Point Ice Rink 0-4 Lydiard Beach 0-5 Livingston Tower Park R 0-6 Antoine Park 0-7 Highwood Park 0-8 Sandy Beach 0-9 Summit Park Swimming Beach 0-10 Bederwood Park 0-11 Hackberry Park 0-12 Orono Golf Course 0-13 Seven Nations Park 0-14 Navarre Playground 0-15 Crystal Bay Playground 0-16 Lowry Woods 0-17 French Creek Preserve 0-18 Saga Hill Preserve 0-19 Pleasant View Park 0-20 Big Island Nature Park 0-21 Lurton Off -Leash Dog Park PRIVATE / PUBLIC PP -1 Lakeview Legacy Park NATURE CONSERVANCY NC -1 Ferndale Marsh ORONO SCHOOL SYSTEM FACILITIES S-1 Orono School System Facilities S-2 Lee Carlson Baseball Fields Hi DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES e DNR -1 Luce Line Trail e DNR -2 Wolsfeld Woods Nature Area DNR -3 Maxwell Bay Lake Access 00 DNR -4 Wood Hill Scientific & Natural Area MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT MCWD-1 Wolsfeld Creek HENNEPIN COUNTY H-1 North Arm Boat Landing THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT 3R-1 Noerenberg Gardens 3R-2 Baker Park Reserve 3R-3 Lake Minnetonka Islands Regional Park j 2040 Comprehensive Plan Orono, MN \t�xES H 04`j Turner Road L"' waY2 . — .. _ .. _ .. _ .. Stu 20� Moon •- utas --- -.._.. _.�00 ._...._.._..p`�°.._.._.._.._.._ .._.._ Drake Dr>, ° z z z _ Oa� - �o Nam 6th Ave N v.oad 1 V N 0 3 Sprfn9 '2 z rd z �P�!`j s Kelley PK.NY m' ha Painter C in Long 1 a z Lake 441, o °0 v 1 Daniels St m . � i� 0 1 •• a' Moline Road V oG �d�e m '1 Orc' arq in W ayza , / 00,0 <o u. Y" �OWry Roaq 1 Grand Ave e, a �� n9 LaA�,� IR& (n as us 0 12 1,1 130 m° awn O 0. I as 14 1 U J OyA R° v °4n 2N16 Stubbs ;� oj 'ghoreline.Ur c • N A 5 Bay �+ 1 s'° . Z �_ o �I �e� a Fox St �.._s, �AeaveyLn c 0 hf�r A Or qe D( \� C' �0N County Road 151 �k'Y 0 1A ' - ,e��m o '� I Ferngale Road We q. W Branch Road North �� ger - CV Tri Arm o 23 22 Maxwell ern �V Lake Minl w Bay French � C 0, Forest24 Marsh �° 27 .28 3 Lake : 21� 3� -may Jenning's 1 25 20 �0 2 Bay 29 A2 A. m 3 I 1 1 k 19 y`1'7 4 `shore or : IN as ♦30 31 33 Smith b,acketa 1 �' �/,, . 1 g• Bay : �e .4 ♦ A Thr o' Vest 32 34 �•' �•�OI etch ee F°jntQ vdo Irm Crystal Bohns ' �.� I N eke Bt 70 Bay Pomt••� ass B35, oa . • • -5 •+ as I -1 !' 1 1 Arcola,�� 1 Lynwoo,L d Ed ew2l"" ' - .. _ .. _ .. _ : (ogo Road 1 Blvd E 9 p 1 EW Arm Dr Northern Ave 7 8 < „ / -0 1 3� V a 6 1 1 afayett( afa`Je@e �0 1 a Rutled 1 ,�a<.yric•Ave • - • • - • • - ,y �' 1 Azure Ro 14 Lake Avg n don ♦ �• /`40 sh ��• A � d "Its as '•• parkg11 Legend e 39 ��.� ° °� i A/\ A 9` OOOF . e °dy ♦ Lakeview Pi/ City Limits Lakes & Ponds 36 Carman' 41 ♦ 9 Bay �. •� 41 A o 2040 MUSA Rivers & Streams ® 38 �♦• °4 '•` /i\ A �.•� OdRoad J Mir 0 3,5003 '0' n J a arT Feet •. `• 1• c�° w Source: Met. Council, City of Orono, ' . • • - • . - .. - ` Q0 r W �anoc = Slrw Hennepin County, MnDOTkz Vine St Lake Access Points BOLTON November 2018 & M E N K Real People. Real Solutions. City of Orono Lake Minnetonka Access Points U�d-d 4/2/(n, 5121/08,1/2119 Designated Use and Cunreit Status Brown'! Bay (LL k ) P e rawnry 1prov5, nmtmnal pa n, mtl Oz.l.ns alN pal mg orelme Dn cpplarfuM1'ng apd,wieerveM1mlm Hp . O2 we few'ble Smith Bay (1, war Lake) 2 s Adi.— unaONy u.dmwn.a, Rd—ai_'—.flowed Asorx016pnvuely ownMwiN ary mmnmltulekeawm mtlemitary buk up e<nealm. 3 N IShore.e 1 n a 192 Nwe uam, are on Ore neW aWPa Mjazm�.9hmdineOmc A�eeo nope mtl,afery'..um Nie xx.. paid ie pd open lystal Bey X9&3510 � wddeplanMramrgM1t dww ShadywWdxom el9mueDr N 1998/2000 w�devleuM alley rlwey abunmg M1tmw an eiNaeiee 6 Cryual Hey xvai (w<p <,M 1xS Mtdwh� w,de PlanmroM eamN lake. Cdy al tl mry mkeehmeperceY to Neem[aan Mdiuow130D'or,MNin<, aver abad—waad �n<ha.mNaarmlm dgh ctr xaM(>u dad Omrommi slay kam armd wry wn 'I dm.'me anN known mcmwummeDm. 7 ofP.ry Immpmt 1,8 34o5YXIJ � 850,616 datlCMNw. Dam 11 I 'eb WiM1 WN e`M1aaorart NkenMNmp.ryoem"nonan, or I dtllim...) tlmt NevlmMaley bewem tl w MbrN g a r <mm,33-13315 -in. ,„asp ants ra.away .ipa xw m.Rmn nagroaNwd and an lmtlrt.i <w: aarml.wnax Maxwell Bay PMmmmym. I abbaeana�w pa. s< as Adi 1°31zs mnd venelw r x<ae.Naw.ww,waud A. awnM br wma.rslzs, city naa waenmlaee wum. city.aiNain. arae. tubba Bay xay.<gp<e 42„X63 �<rlmy aM.mgaeeMaahl.Da.1 xd 35g0I1690 PUM1Ing Doak 3 nee watl f'O. Strwt"molal of'Bw View Pak")Ako.em rawima e<,maby mow.dilw mYLu<e Line Ids Pda wRom 3600. 3 Oaryeide Npubtleawwa w°I60`Plwed cordo and me65'plenMroad to Ne L.e Dak.SPmg and Maple Slreeemphto[Bry Viev Pmk; mtl Thaew St inpluM ouwilkmLeke Mimnmkal 3xexpdneule«ew p.upearc nol apnea far p.0a.nae. eeraieexd. �a,m<ann3 aa< Nn�a<amw. sa�mlia�Mpl.n<erma(amllgwa•L.<su.r Nawplmaew.wln<mLek<mimaodna)(sm,o-<nal<5r/.5 ear,ie<). nor apmm car 14 wml.eg6a ;, lg9 0" :.tldgM11.�. ymm,.Wl.mM1 k.azww mry. North Arm Bay eak Lm<Is 699 Pialm.g Dpdk 6'w,aeplanM.aM.P..<a ro Na<r <.w.e1<rorbaa lmarhb.Ne<a..pa.mg wedNle 16 ak Slrwt Uavmg<wry tle planM.admewdWM,sdW alWea.mnvme limit.,. 9almv Pmk xoma fO°'i- wink A—m —me ofp—ddevelWM mawi[-1,. Norelum OW Place(Plm.tlrwtlin pluofMbsna. Nopmneaa., 4401 MO Plants aMm MmM<—M Rom—Sbam Drivexmeplm.a cheer Ave. dendme moray weamaW.Wvwmer, CmW ast Yew^) mwahMby ehasd driveway B.. (6Tim6 ... 6d-d.ny W city bmck crml suwl s10 �envp ag<war sew,d.PI.--, mrdudWM U Sp.ce— N.p.ba<aamv 40wad.(mnam4 uta p— nmuW)Pluutlmdwry, wdwelWM, PnamcM1M nM.M .Ix. xz g/u3P aP waa<I a<mMorvNoma.razww LA.<nn< mat ake fake Lmmh, u13/x440 60 x+depmmm WMngm. otwry.accez na dwa wok' ty Pmaoarhmemeprexnt mavens EI.— saW or 1199 wdeplauei roedtaleymdmel edrigiaor 1 d Nmd'e h M v<we(Huewim of 7S 1067-1 wme PlanM.ad wMeux Wee rigM1ld way M1ore me.,remagevw9 e gha orwry uNarehns d wm M—t Ann By right dLI10.B-6He.g�Awwu-,P earem Dmw b`�bmee, 93 g rem Dw m� n ammh an -w ,d _ Aaa� ,3114,49 Owmage 01plants.. gd-- mpfd or eg w,.lum'—.. .save Wed ver deW. weefwdminage ss a<dPalm l.mem s 1-t- eetlaa"ia' 'pl.nMrigm-awa 8mm .veil mmnd mmd Wlake <""1e1 as Rea Paimxwd Is 1405/1410 w ori 6',—mdrightd- dmaw abo.f40'e[NaNinapwMbdmbod 1—hu. auabble ` UNad Beuh Plaza r& W-5300 PMmnW o'vlaneemdrighr-°P-wey exrm.[oalaelinu treeaawlh mutapo6apM lumnvehiwlm w<ew 41J6Wtma'..- D 71 His—d-6. 9 O'plalmi ulryriglad-way to ehordine. sleep ilW<ta iiaeli�rc. maevelopM Rd X. H.hwaMxwd Allry ,S. mle O'PuM eilryrgFd-pr-wryto O�meiurc. rot tlevAWM m .alk r<re�ma 1sN Oe r . y�olmge Nm.ng dor raap<a,w Na<ia �opwa< umbymodnb me m. hav<xank<ama<emm en�n Pring Park say M Paimaeuh 1111171,1­1x "I ' wd<pmled wadf Caman 9r )uxdw aC�ry wimm ngbea<M1 Snxp3 a<PlavM mad mgM1l orwry to Nar<.<d N<aoaN am<orena<ae ee.elWM G37 rm ns Bay ne ovr el.ee) —d. maepl.nM wm,gm arww mem �glaNwel neem onvr P.a auW.wdrwaaNage p p mmmgm.arwry uam c.am pnNlxaMra Nwam<mmgawN,w<arpl.rae"xmuacw< memdWM, w.kR,gazr� �Iwid 40 Camun etlrigM1t ofwry memingra Nare me. R,hu. tlwk 41 Ldiareeea ad ngFl ofwry mets ngto Nael'ne.usedw eC�ry awimmmgbmch Ig lstand d.pm mdmadw ..dMa,Malmdpak madd""fooi lAvmm" N dwmwar adjazmr W Lot 45.Max Lind Pak-,lop......d�wh rmmMSlrea 21-N 'wiaepleuMmetlway bows. Lob 38 ma 39. Monelaland Pa.Ciry ha. w�ebliNM dnwble aw<I roatlMmmgenry &eervirevela<le ry eh<r M<.eoww,ee.nxama<c` R wieeplmM roaawar bdwem Lau v am X.Mouel,IWa wn vwiaePlaNdwmwar a aMaweld.na ea. eeW.IW<..e,.ae dm<nr vdd.paPMm.warbaw<W aamparkmdLal3Mm,<1.I.mPah�Aadam meEa„em la ena pad: mtl Lut svrv<. avbtlime�m orLal>; Maneltlmd eak-deW elute Mets Iky 6Pk ue�eiay bows. tl lam Perk M bk rut ane.mry am env mveM1ide. -I-d— a 0 IX Ln t Lake Access Points - Lake Access Points Map4E-2 'nava TABLE OF CONTENTS CMP PART 5 Plan Implementation Comprehensive Plan Adoption and amendment Implementation Capital Improvement Plan Intergovernmental Coordination Appendix Map 5-1 Zoning Map Appendix 5-A Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Appendix 5 B Zoning Map Appendix 5-13O Comprehensive Plan Survey 5-1 5-3 5-4 5-5 CMP Part 5. Implementation CMP Part 5 COMPREHENSIVE PLANADOPTIONAND AMENDMENT The basic goals and philosophies contained in the 1974 Orono Village Comprehensive Guide Plan were continued inabseqwtplans and are still the backbone of this 2020-2040 CMP. This update has been drafted by City Staff with input from an Advisory Committee established to advise the city on the development of this plan, and a separate committee and consultant, WSB and Associates, established to advise the city and its eenst fta*t on the development of the Navarre Area Plan. The Planning Commission and City Council received this input and support this plan. The Advisory Committee members were: Planning Advisory Committee (PAC) Bob Erickson Candice Nadler Chad Olson Dennis Libby Dennis Walsh Jan Berg Jennifer Smiley John Morast Jon Schwingler Meg Cowden Phil Lusardi Rick Meyers Navarre Area Plan (NAP) Erik Zweber, WSB and Associates Carlo Missio, WSB and Associates Ralph Kempf Charles Nadler Kirk Sherman Michael Reymann Tanya Srepel Devon Steinmeyer Ross Elenkiwich Harry Yaffe John O'Sullivan Shawn Mclntee Mary Tucker Bill Wolfson The Advisory Committees held a number of open houses to and community interactions to generate interest and facilitate comments. The PAC held a public Open House on September 13, 2017 to introduce the work to the public, and an open house on May 10, 208 to introduce the public review period. A final open house was held on October 25th to allow the public to review the final plan and to collect more comments prior to final adjustments for Planning Commission and City Council review. Open House forums were chosen to facilitate comments from City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 5, Page 2 CMP Part 5. Implementation constituents that may be uncomfortable speaking in larger, more formal forums. In the Summer/ Fall of 2017, an online survey was distributed to help inform the planning process for the comprehensive plan. This survey is attached as Exhibit 5-C. PLAN ADOPTION Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 462.355, Subd. 2, the Orono Planning Commission explained the intent and the details of the CMP, and received public comments thereon, at an official Public Hearing held for that purpose on November 19, 2018. Notice of the Hearing was published in the official City newspaper on November 3, 2018. Following closing of the Public Hearing, and after discussion concerning changes and comments resulting from the Hearing, the Planning Commission on a vote of 6-0 recommended that the City Council adopt the Plan. On December 10, 2018 the Orono City Council on a vote of approved the concept and direction ofthe Community Management Plan, and adopted Resolution granting approval of the plan and ordering its submittal to the Metropolitan Council for review and approval. This Community Management Plan was delivered to the Metropolitan Council on for their official review and approval. Metropolitan Council granted formal approval of the Plan on . The Orono City Council formally adopted the Plan via Resolution No. on on a vote of _ ayes and _ nay. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 5, Page 3 CMP Part 5. Implementation PLAN DISTRIBUTION This CMP and any future amendments made thereto shall be distributed to the following agencies and jurisdictions as required by law: CITY OF ORONO City Clerk - 2 copies for permanent record METROPOLITAN COUNCIL STATE OF MINNESOTA Department of Transportation Department of Natural Resources HENNEPIN COUNTY Administration Department of Transportation ADJACENT MUNICIPALITIES Chanhassen Deephaven Eden Prairie Greenwood Independence Long Lake Medina Minnetonka Minnetrista Mound Plymouth Shorewood Spring Park Tonka Bay Wayzata SCHOOL DISTRICTS 276 Minnetonka 277 Westonka 278 Orono 284 Wayzata INDEPENDENT DISTRICTS Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Lake Minnetonka Conservation District Three Rivers Park District PERIODIC REVIEW The Community Management Plan is intended to be reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council, and updated if necessary. PLAN AMENDMENT After formal adoption of this CMP by the City Council, there shall be no amendments made to the plan content except by the following applicable state law. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 5, Page 4 CMP Part 5. Implementation IMPLEMENTATION The City utilizes various tools to implement the Comprehensive Plan. The primary tools include, but are not limited to: 1) Zoning Regulations and Zoning Map — Chapter 78 of the City Code 2) Subdivision Regulations — Chapter 82 of the City Code 3) Individual Sewage Treatment System Regulations — Chapter 58 of the City Code 4) Sewer and Water System Regulations — Chapters 14 and 82 of the of the City Code 5) Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) (Appendix 5-A) 6) City Budget 7) City Fee Schedule (esp. sewer, water, and park dedication fees to support infrastructure). Zoning Regulations and Zoning Map The current zoning map is attached as AppenA4 X "3Map 5-1. The City intends to review these official controls for consistency with the Comprehensive Plan within nine months of adopting the Plan as required by State law. The City will also make any changes which are necessary to make the official controls consistent with the Plan within this timeframe. The City has identified that the following changes may be necessary to make the official controls consistent with the Plan: 1) Review standards for development within the Mixed Residential Land Use. 2) Amend official controls to achieve consistency with updated density requirements for Medium -High Density Residential and High Density Residential land uses. 3) Amend official zoning map for property for which a Future Land Use was amended. 4) Review environmental protection regulations. Administrative Provisions The Ordinances pertaining to general government operation are updated on an ongoing basis to reflect current policy and requirements. General performance standard revisions may be needed to be consistent with the CMP, with current development concerns and with recognized existing situations. The City wishes to carefully protect CMP plans and neighborhood property values, but does not want to require unnecessary zoning reviews, extensive delays, or unrealistic standards. Areas needing attention include: -Ceommercial district development standards and uses, Llake access management, Sstandards for private roads, and Nnonconforming use provisions. ISTS Management The City's progressive policies regarding management of individual sewage treatment systems will be continued and strengthened as the best insurance policy against unnecessary extension of municipal sewers into the Rural Area. The City will continue to provide for a full-time City employee whose duties are public education and the enforcement of proper on-site sewage City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 5, Page 5 CMP Part 5. Implementation treatment system operation. Current ordinances provide for regular system maintenance and for periodical inspection of all existing systems by the City inspector. Environmental Ordinances The Shoreland Management ordinances adopted in 1992 require only minimal if any revisions at this time. An updated Floodplain Ordinance was adopted in 2016 to be in conformitywith FEMA and other regulations, and a new Wetlands Ordinance was adopted in 2005 in compliance with MCWD requirements as well as those of the Surface Water Management Plan. Certain additional amendments of these Ordinances may be required upon forthcoming adoption of the updated SWMP. Lake Use Ordinances The regulations involving lake use, harbor limits and management of access to Lake Minnetonka as a recreational resource will be reviewed to determine whether they should more adequately incorporate Lake Minnetonka Conservation District rules where appropriate, and to provide City regulation wherenecessary. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Overview In order to achieve Orono's development goals and objectives in accordance with the CMP, expenditures of public funds will be required. Such expenditures may include acquisition of park and open space lands, road construction or reconstruction, maintenance equipment purchases, municipal building improvements, utility extension or reconstruction, stormwater management facilities construction, and the like. The city annually reviews the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) to identify and prioritize capital expenditures over a sufficient period to allow for adequate financial and budgetary planning. The CIP allows the City Council to make sound financial decisions for accomplishing the various capital improvements required to implement the CMP. The CIP is attached as Appendix 5-A to this chapter. Potential funding sources for capital improvement expenditures may include: General Fund - Special Assessment - General Obligation Bonds - Revenue Bonds - Tax Increment Financing - Development Impact Fees - Grants from public agencies - Donations SUMMARY OF PROJECTED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 5, Page 6 CMP Part 5. Implementation Commercial/Industrial Development Infrastructure The public improvements required to support Orono=s planned development are essentially in place. Minor expansions of infrastructure are expected to be paid for by the developer. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 5, Page 7 CMP Part 5. Implementation Sewer/Water Systems Renovation Ongoing maintenance of the City --s sewer and water systems occasionally requires capital expenditures for major rehabilitation work. These system renovation projects will be primarily funded by revenues from operation of these utilities, with additional necessary funding from special assessment to the systemusers. Parks and Open Space The CIP includes a Parks, Open Space and Trails element. The primary capital expenditures will involve the improvement and maintenance of existing park lands. Funding sources will include fees collected through the subdivision process (Park Fund), the General Fund, and grants or donations from public agencies and private entities. A large proportion of Orono's existing preserved open space has been through private and public contribution. Stormwater Management Implementation of Orono's Surface Water Management Plan (SWMP) will require significant public expenditures, including site acquisition and construction of stormwater retention ponds, storm sewer construction, and related projects. Funding sources will include the City's Stormwater and Drainage Utility Fees (charged to all properties on an annual basis); the Stormwater and Drainage Trunk Fees (charged to all new developments); the General Fund; and grants from other public agencies. Road Maintenance and Reconstruction Reconstruction of City roads has in the past been funded through the General Fund rather than by special assessments. This practice is expected to continue. Minnesota State Aid (MSA) funding for reconstruction of qualified road segments will be a principal source of funding for ongoing road reconstruction. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION Orono has a number of long-standing interrelationships with surrounding jurisdictions and public agencies. These relationships have arisen as a result of many and varied factors, including: geographic proximity; efficiency and economies of scale; mutual goals and philosophies; and a desire to provide for a more uniform and coordinated planning and delivery of services. Orono will continue to encourage cooperative local efforts for the sharing of services, equipment and facilities. Cooperation with regional and state governmental units will be encouraged, especially where mutual goals can be identified and implemented. City of Orono Community Management Plan 2020-2040 Part 5, Page 8 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL l� A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 2020-2040 CITY OF ORONO COMMUNITY MANAGEMENT PLAN FILE NO. LA18-000044 WHEREAS, the City of Orono is a municipal corporation located within Hennepin County and within the planning jurisdiction of the Metropolitan Council; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the Metropolitan Land Planning Act of 1976 and with Minnesota Statutes Chapters 462 and 473, the City of Orono in November 1981 adopted a comprehensive municipal plan known as the 1980 City of Orono Community Management Plan to provide for the orderly development of the City; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the 1995 amendments to the Metropolitan Land Planning Act, the City of Orono in November 2001 adopted an update of the 1980 CMP entitles the 2000-2020 Orono Community Management Plan to provide for the continued orderly development of the City; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the Metropolitan Systems Statement issued to Orono by the Metropolitan Council in 2005, the City of Orono approved a revised, updated version of the 2000-2020 CMP, to be known as the 2008/-2030 Orono Community Management Plan; and WHEREAS, in accordance with the Metropolitan Systems Statement issued to Orono by the Metropolitan Council in 2015, the City of Orono approved a revised, updated version of the 2008-2020 CMP, to be known as the 2020-2040 Orono Community Management Plan ("the Plan"); and WHEREAS, on April 26, 2018, the Plan was distributed to neighboring communities and affected agencies; and WHEREAS, on August 27, 2018, the Plan was distributed to the Metropolitan Council for preliminary comment; and WHEREAS, after due published notice, on October 25, 2018 the City of Orono held an open house where interested parties could provide comment on the Plan; and WHEREAS, after due published notice, on November 19, 2018 the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the Plan, at which time public was able to comment; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the comments received from adjacent municipalities and other affected jurisdictions, as well as the preliminary comments received from the Metropolitan Council CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL in a letter dated November 13, the Plan was subsequently modified to address those comments; and after due published notice, on November 19, 2018 the Orono Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the Plan, at which time public was able to comment; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes 473.858 requires a local government unit to submit its proposed comprehensive plan to the Metropolitan Council following recommendation by the Planning Commission and after consideration, but before final approval by the governing body of the local governmental unit; and WHEREAS, on December 10, 2018, the Orono City Council reviewed the Plan, comments received to date, and accepted further comments. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby directs staff to formally submit the 2020-2040 Comprehensive Plan to the Metropolitan Council for review no later than December 31, 2018, in accordance with Minnesota States section 473.964. . ADOPTED by the Orono City Council on this 10th day of December, 2018 ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members Dustin Rief, City Administrator From: Jeremy Barnhart, Community Development Director Date: November 19, 2018 Subject: #LA18-44, City of Orono, 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update, Public Hearing Application Summary: After a public hearing, consider the state required comprehensive update for the 2040 Community Management Plan. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval as drafted. Background Section 473.858 of Minnesota State law requires the submission of a comprehensive plan amendment to the Metropolitan Council (Met Council) every ten years. The last comprehensive rewrite of the Comprehensive Plan was completed in 2008. This amendment is due to the Met Council by December 31, 2018. The City of Orono calls its Comprehensive Plan a Community Management Plan. The terms are used interchangeably. This Comprehensive Plan draft was introduced to the public formally in April, 2018. This introduction included posting the draft on the cities website and an open house on May 10, 2018. The plan was also sent to area agencies and governments, who are given 6 months to review and provide comment. That comment period ended on October 29, 2018. A final public open house was held on October 25tH. Open houses were selected as a way to generate comments from individuals not comfortable with speaking in front of large groups. The Planning Commission will hold a formal public hearing on Monday, November 19tH The Plan amendment was developed by a committee of residents, who met monthly and guided and advised staff on changes to the plan. The committee members are: Jennifer Smiley, Resident Meg Cowden, Resident Chad Olson, Planning Commission Candice Nadler, Resident Rick Meyers, Park Commission Jon Schwingler, Planning Commission Bob Erickson, Resident, Planning Commission Dennis Libby, Resident, Planning Commission Phil Lusardi, Resident John Morast, Resident Jan Berg, Park Commission Dennis Walsh, Mayor FILE #18-44 November 19, 2018 Page 2 of 5 This Committee operated under three primary goals: 1. Retain rural character and natural resource protection policies established in previous plans. 2. Satisfy Met Council requirements. 3. Improve the readability of the document. The Plan. A draft of the plan, showing changes from the April version, is posted on the website, and in dropbox. The changes may appear to be numerous, but many of them are based on formatting changes, updated data from sources including the state and the Met Council, and responses to comments received during the 6 month review. The plan retains the general development and land and water protection philosophies established by earlier plans. Preservation of rural character and preservation of water quality was very important to the committee. Metropolitan Council estimates. The Metropolitan Council requires the plans to reflect growth in population, households, and employment over the next 20 years. Table 313-1: Orono Population, Households, and Employment 1970 - 2040 (Sewered and Unsewered Forecasts) Population Year 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2016 2020 2030 2040 Sewered -- -- -- -- 4,429 -- 5,150 6,170 6,740 Unsewered -- -- -- -- 3,008 -- 2,950 2,630 2,760 Total City 6,787 6,845 7,285 7,538 7,437 7,691 8,100 8,800 9,500 Household Year 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2016 2020 2030 2040 Sewered -- -- -- -- 1,780 2,253 2,105 2,455 2,785 Unsewered -- -- -- -- 1046 784 1,095 1,105 1,115 Total City 2,146 2,291 2,613 2,766 2,826 3,037 3,200 3,560 3,900 Persons/M 11 3.16 2.99 2.79 2.73 2.63 2.53 2.53 2.47 2.44 Employment 500 809 980 951 1562 1579 1700 1780 1800 Source: Metropolitan Council System Statement The Committee, while meeting the Met Council predictions, noted that the City retains its' right to review development proposals for consistency with the Comprehensive plan (not just land use) and applicable zoning ordinances to ensure a development is the right fit for the neighborhood and city as a whole. The Plans, in meeting Met Council projections, was focused at the household level. For instance, between 2030 and 2016, the projections show an addition of 523 households. Properties were identified that, through density allocation, could be development to generate this number of households. FILE #18-44 November 19, 2018 Page 3 of 5 Points of interest. Expansion of MUSA. The Plan proposes a single expansion of the MUSA boundary, to serve vacant property on the north end of Wildhurst while preserving steep slopes and significant tree stands in the area. This is a change from the draft proposed in April. Land Use. To meet the growth projections of the Metropolitan Council, the Land Use Map was updated. The map (313-3) reflects a revised listing of land use categories. These 10 categories are used throughout the document per Met Council requirements and include 7 residential, 2 commercial/ industrial, and a park/open space land use. Island residential is a new land use and is employed for the residences on Big Island and Deering Island. The plan shows low density residential (0.5-2 units per acre) as the predominate land use south of Fox Street. An earlier version of the land use map showed portions of these area as medium density residential, recognizing the development patterns established. However, based on feedback reviewed, the Council directed these areas, including Crystal Bay, Casco Point, Fagerness Point, and Navarre, to change back to low density residential. Final Maps reflect this direction. In the northern portion of the community, residential land uses were introduced to the Kelley Parkway and Wayzata Blvd areas. The parcels south of Lake Classen were not changed from Rural Residential. In order to prevent larger scale expansion of the MUSA, and therefore introduction of density in our rural areas, (or increased building heights) increased opportunity for density had to be added in the Navarre and northern Orono areas. The Committee applied density in areas where they felt it was most appropriate, given transportation networks, neighboring land uses, and services available. A number of comments generated during the review period were based on a perception of changes in density, particularly in the area north of Long Lake. These areas changed names, but not density. Changes to land use as proposed are summarized in Exhibit E. Planned Development Sites. It is a requirement of the planning process that sites be identified for potential growth in the next 20 years. The Committee updated the Planned Development sites map, originally developed as part of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. Map 313-4 is the revised version and shows 5 areas that could be the subject of development proposals. These 5 areas provide 'growth' in a range of densities, from 0.5 to 2 units per acre (green) to High Density Residential (Yellow) 20-25 u/a. Navarre Area Plan. The Navarre Area Plan, conducted by the Planning Consultant WSB and Associates was incorporated in the Land Use Chapter, 3B and influenced some of the land use in that area. Editing. The Committee worked hard to reduce the length of the document, removing redundant statements, in the hopes of making it more 'readable' while retaining the FILE #18-44 November 19, 2018 Page 4 of 5 major policy discussions outlined within. As proposed changes are accepted, additional pagination will be necessary. Maps. The maps were updated to reflect new roads and parcels established since the 2008 plan. In part to reflect a comment by the Met Council, two copies of Land Use and sewer maps were created. One set includes parcel boundaries that are clearer when printed at a larger size. The Park Commission reviewed the park Trail and Open Space Chapter at their meeting in March. Public Comments The 6 month formal comment period yielded a number of comments, attached with responses as Exhibit B. City staff also has received a number of formal (written) and informal (verbal) comments from citizens after the comment period. These written comments are provided as Exhibit C. The City also received comments from the Metropolitan Council's preliminary review, attached as Exhibit D. Generally, citizens commenting expressed a concern with adding density, linking high density to school overcrowding, traffic congestion, lack of jobs, and crime. Frequently, staff heard questions such as: "why do we need to meet growth projections at all." The response is that we are growing, (an average of 54 new homes each year since 2014) and because of state law and logical planning, City simply must plan and anticipate growth, especially given our housing goals: "Orono has identified the need for a broader range of housing choices including starter homes, empty -nester, and senior housing, and an ongoing need for substantial housing rehabilitation." These housing goals remain the same from the 2008 Plan. The plan anticipates growth based on Met Council projections, and the variety of density offers opportunities to satisfy our housing goals. This is done without sacrificing the rural character and our role in preserving the lakes and natural areas. Not all comments were negative toward development, some comments have been received that look forward to apartments and condominiums that allow them to stay in the community. Issues for Consideration. The Commission could contemplate the following policy questions identified through the review of the document. 1. Does the Commission concur with the following 7 guiding principals: Guiding Principle #1: Promote ecologically sensitive stormwater management. Applying an ecologically -based stormwater management system will improve ecosystems by reducing both reliance on manmade infrastructure and reducing downstream runoff of contaminants. FILE #18-44 November 19, 2018 Page 5 of 5 Guiding Principle #2: Establish and maintain native ecological communities. Conserving and improving natural and semi -natural areas will provide wildlife habitat and support natural ecological functions (i.e. drainage, filtering, buffering, etc). Guiding Principle #3: Establish and maintain ecological connections. Creating ecological connections will enhance stormwater collection and conveyance, promote ecological and wildlife corridors, and provide recreational opportunities for residents. Guiding Principle #4: Preserve and augment corridor enclosure. Maintaining and improving the extent of roadway corridor enclosures will promote community aesthetics associated with the city's rural character. Guiding Principle #5: Preserve views. Mitigating the visual impacts of development will also preserve the aesthetic elements of the landscape. Guiding Principle #6: Preserve and maintain landmarks and unique points of local character. Preserving distinct cultural features will maintain a familiar sense of place in the community. Guiding Principle #7: Continue to work to educate property owners and residents on the effects development and use have on the environment and character of the community. 2. Does the Commission concur with the Housing Implementation Plan (3C -Page 13) 3. Does the Commission concur with the Transportation Implementation Plan (4A, page 23) 4. Does the Commission feel changes are necessary to the Land Use Plan? Map 313-3 5. Has the Commission identified any other changes identified? List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Maps Exhibit B. Formal Area Agency comments and responses Exhibit C. Written comments received after Comment period Exhibit D. Met Council comments Exhibit E. Land Use Change summary Exhibit F. Draft Plan MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, November 19, 2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. 4. LA18-000044 CITY OF ORONO, 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT, 7:30 P.M. — 8:03 P.M. Barnhart stated tonight is the scheduled public hearing for the 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update. The City has been working on this update since March of 2017. Every city within the 7 -county metropolitan area has to update their Comprehensive Plan every ten years and this one is due December 31, 2018. Each amendment must include specific topics that are mandated by state statute, and those include housing, land use, transportation, sanitary sewer and water. The City's Comprehensive Plan Update does include those topics. In addition, the Metropolitan Council provides projected numbers relating to Orono's anticipated population, household and employment growth over the next 10 to 20 years so the City can plan for that type of growth. Even though the City has to plan for that type of growth, that does not mean it will occur, nor does the City have to approve every project that comes before them. Barnhart stated this is the first hurdle that needs to be crossed in terms of a development proposal and some proposals have triggered an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. A committee was established by the City Council in March of 2017 and included 13 members. The committee met monthly and guided and advised Staff on changes to the plan. The Committee operated under three primary goals: Retain rural character and natural resource protection policies established in previous plans. 2. Satisfy Metropolitan Council requirements. 3. Improve the readability of the document. The Plan retains the general development and land and water protection philosophies established by earlier plans. Preservation of rural character and preservation of water quality was very important to the committee. The Comprehensive Plan was published on the City's website and also sent to surrounding cities for their review and comment. A number of the changes were based on formatting changes and updated data from sources, including the state and the Metropolitan Council. The comments received during the public comment period have been incorporated into an exhibit to the document. In addition, two open houses were held for the residents this past year. Barnhart noted the City's housing goals have remained basically the same, and the table included in Staff's report reflects Orono's population, household and employment forecasts from 1970 through 2040. The City is required to provide opportunity for 154 units of affordable housing making the average or below the average median income. Currently there is around 639 units of that type in Orono. The City provides for those opportunities by guiding different sections of the City for higher density. Libby asked whether the Metropolitan Council provides the City with any metrics for growth besides HUD. Barnhart indicated the Metropolitan Council does provide quite a bit of information and tools to help develop the plan. The Metropolitan Council also provides a projected number of new households. Page 1 of 3 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, November 19, 2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. The City's Transportation Plan reflects regional transportation plans developed by Hennepin County and comments received from Medina. No new corridors were proposed in the update. One of the comments of the Metropolitan Council was to make the bus system more attractive to users to help alleviate traffic in certain areas. The Comprehensive Plan Update does retain the City's concept of the ring route, which was introduced in 2008. Some of the comments received related to high traffic levels on Shoreline Drive. Barnhart stated due to existing traffic levels, improvements in the Navarre area are somewhat challenging but Hennepin County's Transit Advantage Plan provides some alternatives to no new development. Barnhart noted the following changes are included in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan but that it is not an all-inclusive list: Expansion of MUSA. The Plan proposes a single expansion of the MUSA boundary to serve vacant property on the north end of Wildhurst while preserving steep slopes and significant tree stands in the area. This is a change from the draft proposed in April. 2. Land Use. To meet the growth projections of the Metropolitan Council, the Land Use Map was updated. The map reflects a revised listing of land use categories. These ten categories are used throughout the document per Metropolitan Council requirements and include seven residential, two commercial/industrial, and a park/open space land use. Island residential is a new land use and is employed for the residences on Big Island and Deering Island. The plan shows low density residential as the predominant land use south of Fox Street. An earlier version of the land use map showed portions of these area as medium density residential, recognizing the development patterns established. Based on feedback, the Council directed these areas, including Crystal Bay, Casco Point, Fagerness Point, and Navarre, change back to low density residential. In the northern portion of the community, residential land uses were introduced to the Kelley Parkway and Wayzata Boulevard areas. The parcels south of Lake Classen were not changed from Rural Residential. In order to prevent larger scale expansion of the MUSA and introduction of density in the rural areas, increased opportunity for density had to be added in the Navarre and northern Orono areas. The Committee applied density in areas where they felt it was most appropriate, given transportation networks, neighboring land uses, and services available. Planned Development Sites. It is a requirement of the planning process that sites be identified for potential growth in the next 20 years. The Committee updated the Planned Development sites map which shows five areas that could be the subject of development proposals. These five areas provide growth in a range of densities, from 0.5 to 2 units per acre to High Density Residential. 4 Navarre Area Plan. The Navarre Area Plan, conducted by the Planning Consultant, was incorporated in the Land Use Chapter, 313, and influenced some of the land use in that area. Editing. The committee worked hard to reduce the length of the document, removing redundant statements, in the hopes of making it more readable while retaining the major policy discussions. Page 2 of 3 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, November 19, 2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. The Planning Commission should discuss whether they concur with the following seven guiding principles used in drafting the Comprehensive Plan Update: Promote ecologically sensitive storm water management. 2. Establish and maintain native ecological communities. Establish and maintain ecological connections. 4. Preserve and augment corridor enclosure. Preserve views. 6. Preserve and maintain landmarks and unique points of local character. 7. Continue to work to educate property owners and residents on the effects development and land use have on the environment and character of the community The Planning Commission should also consider the following policy questions identified by Staff: Does the Commission concur with the seven guiding principles outlined in Staff's report? 2. Does the Commission concur with the housing implementation plan? Does the Commission concur with the Transportation Implementation Plan? 4. Does the Commission feel changes are necessary to the Land Use Plan? Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 8:01 p.m. There were no public comments relating to this application. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 8:01 p.m. Landgraver asked whether a lot of the language relating to green spaces was removed. Barnhart stated two of the comments were removed since they were redundant. Erickson moved, Libby seconded, to recommend approval of Application No. LAI 8-000044, 2040 Comprehensive Plan Amendment. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. Page 3 of 3 2040 Orono Comprehensive Plan Comments based on final draft plan published April 29, 2018 Z:\COMPREHENSIVE PLANS\Coml�aglad 2 50-2040\Comp Plan Comments\Appendix Comp plan comments and responses Commenter Comment Response 1 Aaron Printup Map 3b 3a shows Crystal Bay and some other areas as urban medium density. Adjust map to reflect 2030 planned land use. Why did they go up? It should go back to current definitions. 2 Aaron Printup Map 3b 6 shows the color blue being defined as Institutional. That changed in We did away with the institutional land use because a Met Council 2010 from "Educational" I believe. Educational is more appropriate. requirement is that the zoning ordinance must match the comprehensive plan, and we don't have an educational zone. Education is allowed in R -1A, R -1B ,LR -1A, LR -1 B, and RR -1B zoning districts. 3 Aaron Printup Maps show parks as being defined as Parks, but some are parceled out. How All maps are based on a base layer of parcels, from the County. does that change so they are just simply parks? 4 Westonka Schools Add westonka school features similar to that's listed for Orono School features updated in 4D public services. Orono school features (4E -Kevin Borg Parks) only list school features in Orono. 5 Westonka Schools Add Westonka Community Education Westonka Community Ed included in chapter 4D. -Kevin Borg 6 City of Medina Transportation: Orono's transportation plan discusses the importance of Comment noted, no change limiting non -local truck traffic from Orono roadways to protect city roadways from unnecessary wear. Medina has a similar policy in place and fully supports Orono's objective. 7 City of Medina Transportation: Willow Drive from County Road 24 to County Road 112 is Road classifications will be changed classified as an "other arterial" roadway within regional plans. Medina's transportation plan proposes to reclassify this roadway to a minor collector. It appears that a collector classification would be more appropriate now that Willow Drive does not access Highway 12. Classification as a collector would also seem consistent with Orono's classification south of County Road 112. 8 City of Medina Transportation: Medina identifies Hunter Drive from County Road 24 to County Road classifications will be changed Road 6 as a minor collector and Orono's draft Plan update identifies it as a local roadway. We request that Orono consider a minor collector classification. 9 City of Medina Water supply: Medina notes the potential need for additional water storage in Comment noted, no change the Highway 12 water system during the timeframe covered by this Plan update. Medina recommends that Orono ensure adequate water connection fees to fund such improvements. 10 City of Medina Water Supply: Orono's projected average day water usage and peaking factor Comment noted, no change suggest a high level of lawn irrigation. Lawn irrigation conservation efforts can substantially decrease the need for capital investments in capacity expansions. Z:\COMPREHENSIVE PLANS\Coml�aglad 2 50-2040\Comp Plan Comments\Appendix Comp plan comments and responses 11 City of Medina Parks: Orono's trail plan identifies an off-street trail along Tamarack Drive, Comment noted, no change continuing along Spring Hill Road to Old Long Lake Road to connect to the Luce Line Trail. This location is approximately in the same location as a regional trail search corridor which extends northerly through Medina. Medina supports this connection within Orono and would be interested in considering grant applications for funding. 12 City of Medina Parks: Orono's plan identify future on -street trails along Hunter Drive and No change. Orono's plan reflects Hennepin County's Parks and Trails Plan. Homestead Trail. Medina's trail plan does not identify future on -street trails in these locations extending to the north. 13 City of Medina Parks: The site identified in the "Planned Development Sites" map in the land Update the table to match the map. Also not the difference between sites use chapter do not match the table in the text. It seemed like they may have and area been intended to. 14 City of Medina Parks: In the water supply plan (page 4C, 29), the text references "Future Update table to reflect water vs sewer Sewer Maintenance Needs" (title) and again mentions "sanitary sewer system" in the text. I think this text may have been copied from the sewer chapter and not changed to "water supply" 15 Victoria Seals -Area between West Arm & Crystal Bay does not need to go from Low -Medium Council direction: Keep the area the same as 2030 Planned density Density Residential to Urban Medium Density Residential 3-10 units/acre (unless this is the same, but it doesn't read the same) 16 Victoria Seals Area around Stubbs/Maxwell is currently low density rural (1 house per 2 The change in land use titles are made, but the prescribed density is the acre) now being moved to urban low density residential (.5-2 units/acre). same. Low density residential 0.5-2 units per acre (in 2008) vs Urban Low Density Resident 0.5-2 units per acre (in 2018) We are required to have the same land use designations throughout the comprehensive Plan (see above), and these should correspond to the eventual zoning districts. The plandifferentiates between those areas that are eligible for sanitary sewer, versus those that are not. Note Rural Residential 1 unit / 2 acres, not eligible for sanitary services, and Urban low Density 0-5-2 units/ acre, eligible for services. 17 Victoria Seals Casco Point is currently low density rural (1 house per 2 acre) now being Council direction: Keep the area the same as 2030 Planned density moved to urban low density residential .5-2 units/acre 18 Staff Land Uses in Navarre do not reflect commercial Change commercial land uses along shoreline to Mixed use. 19 Unknown Meeting on map comment: Add trail south of Lake Classen Being contemplated as part of phase 3 planning for Wayzata Blvd 20 Unknown Meeting on -map comment: Add trail between OPS baseball and Willow No change: No public right of way available Neighborhood 21 Unknown Meeting on map comment: Add trail along Orono Orchard Road Existing on road trail, amend map 22 Unknown Meeting on map comment: Add trail West of Willow Drive to Hackberry Park Add a planned sidewalk from willow to Luce Line 23 Rebecca Highest priority: Keep density as low as possible. Can't overstate how Planned growth provided to meet Met Council anticipated growth in orderly Prenevost important this is to Orono residents. And, when you have to add density, please manner, consistent with Orono values make the density hidden, connected to trails/sidewalks, and in keeping with a consistent Orono look and feel. Z:\COMPREHENSIVE PLANS\Comf aRlai2 2 50-2040\Comp Plan Comments\Appendix Comp plan comments and responses 24 Rebecca Second highest priority: Add more connecting trails (in order of priority). Any Sidewalk proposed along Willow, from Kelley south the Luce Line. Some of Prenevost new density added to the west of the school on Wayzata Blvd should have section is in Long Lake. Wayzata Blvd undergoing complete reconstruct, mandatory sidewalks/trails that connect to the dog park and to the school (and intersections will be improved. its new activity center). The intersection of Wayzata Blvd and Willow Drive needs to have safer crosswalks/sidewalks, both in connecting to Kelly Parkway as well going as south on Willow all the way to Hackberry Park. So many bikers/walkers use Willow on this stretch of road (along Super America, Country Cake, etc.), and it is not very safe to travel on, especially when you are trying to cross Wayzata Blvd from the South to get to Harvest Moon and the new trail going into Long Lake. Please continue the trail along Old Orchard Rd, so it can connect to the Luce Line at minimum, but also the Orono golf course and the Dakota trail if possible. Long Lake has a wonderful trail along Old Orchard Rd, but it abruptly ends when you go south into Orono. The ideas around expanding the use of Orono golf course are wonderful, and it would be amazing if residents could more easily access this community area by walking or biking. 25 Rebecca Finally, as we create growth, we need to encourage (and reserve space for) Commercial land uses are planned to be minimal, service more Prenevost business and services that meet the needs of our residents without them neighborhood needs. Larger, regional commercial needs are expected to having to get in their car so much. Especially, with more memory care and be satisfied by adjacent communities. This is done to preserve Orono's senior living options. Having pharmacy services and places to gather/socialize small town character. (lunch spots, coffee) within walking distance would make this area so much more appealing and would help maintain Orono's small town feel. Please help create a better balance between higher density housing and the potential for these types of businesses. For example, the open space across from Harvest Moon should have some type of business as part of the development. 26 Samantha As discussed, I moved to Orono (vs. Plymouth or Wayzata) because I valued Comment noted, no change. Except for areas identified for high desnity Muldoon the rural character of the area, the beautiful landscapes and vistas, and the growth, area remains rural. This was done to prevent the urbanization of wildlife that thrive in our area, along with the strong schools and friendly other areas not appropriate for high density residential. community. While I understand there needs to be some increased density, due to population projections and development pressures, I would urge the Council and the Planning Commission to maintain as much of Orono's traditional rural character as possible. 27 Samantha More specifically, as someone concerned about the water quality within the Comment noted, no change Muldoon Long Lake Creek Sub watershed, and Lake Minnetonka (which are inextricably linked, as the Long Lake Creek Watershed flows directly into Lake Minnetonka), I was pleased to see that the area around Long Lake lake (a "defined rural area" - Fig. 3-A3 of the Comp Plan ) and its wetlands/tributaries were maintained as Urban Low Density Residential (Fig. 3B -3a of the Comp Plan), and zoned LR -1A ("One Family - Lakeshore Residential - 2 Acres" per the Zoning Map) going forward, with a minimum lots size of 2 acres per unit. Z:\COMPREHENSIVE PLANS\Comf aRkaB 2 50-2040\Comp Plan Comments\Appendix Comp plan comments and responses 28 Samantha The proposed zoning around Long Lake is reasonable and appropriate. It is Comment noted, no change Muldoon consistent with past zoning guidelines, and will maintain the existing character of the neighborhood, while allowing for a reasonable level of development. It will allow much of the nutrient rich water run-off (that can lead to dangerous algae blooms) to be re -absorbed into the land, where it can be filtered by wetlands and native plants prior to reaching the Lake. It will also provide valuable natural corridors to allow the movement of wildlife in our neighborhoods - a critical need for our fellow animals and birds and those of us that enjoy them. It provides natural vistas and sweeping views of nature/Lakeshore for residents, and also creates a sense of cohesion and consistency in the neighborhoods surrounding the lake and wetlands. I am strongly in favor of maintaining this Zoning of LR -1A. 29 Samantha I would also like to commend the Committee for planning for additional trail and A trail will be considered as part of the Wayzata Blvd turn back project. Muldoon natural walkways (for example, East Long Lake Road), and connecting new trails when possible to older, traditional trails (Loose Line, Dakota Trail). I would urge the city to consider additional trails around the school areas, as parents and kids would use those walkways for exercise frequently, and it would be great to connect (for example) the school areas to the Lurton Park Dog Park via a trail, or the Willow view neighborhood to the school campus via a trail. Z:\COMPREHENSIVE PLANS\Comf aRka 4MS0-2040\Comp Plan Comments\Appendix Comp plan comments and responses 30 Ava Bird As I reviewed the 2030 and 2040 land use maps I became very concerned. My family owns a historic home on Lake Classes and these new maps show density and medium-high density areas proposed on the 112 side of the lake. I The 2030 map, as approved in 2008 shows the northeast side of Lake Classen as Low density Residential (0.5-2 units per acre). The 2040 Plan, as proposed, shows this area Urban Low, 0.5-2 units per acre. The MUSA boundary is unchanged. North of 112, south of Lake Classen, both plans believe that increasing the population with medium and medium high density areas is detrimental not only to the health of Lake Classen and surrounding reflect Rural Residential (1 unit/ 2 acres) areas, but also does Orono no good in the long run. I have already begun to see the negative effects of rapid development in this area. Lifelong residents are quickly leaving this area because of the dramatic changes that have been happening including residential expansion that is leaving their hometown more populated, busier, and flooding with new developments. The charm and natural setting that has attracted families to this area is quickly being destroyed and replaced with buildings. I have heard this early type of development being compared to Maple Grove, an area that also attracted people because of its natural beauty but quickly grew so dense that the natural landscape was replaced with developments. I know that the mayor has a background in developing areas, and I question if the current residents' best interest really are in mind, as current residents don't benefit from this surge in population at all, and rather have the peaceful area they moved to become a busy suburb. My parents have saved their entire lives to live in our home on Lake Classen and they envisioned it to be their retirement home, but with these changes we are distressed. I oppose the addition of medium density and medium high density proposed zoning anywhere on or near Lake Classen. In addition, I am fully against any type of apartment or condo or townhome that is situated on or near Lake Classen. Keep in mind the historic homes on this Lake, and the families that live in them. Please preserve the natural beauty our area has, and keep in mind with more population comes more problems. Z:\COMPREHENSIVE PLANS\Coml�a&6 2 50-2040\Comp Plan Comments\Appendix Comp plan comments and responses From: Stacey Royal To: Jeremy Barnhart; victoriaseals(abamail.com; Denny Walsh Cc: David Royal Subject: Comprehensive Plan Public Opinion Date: Wednesday, November 07, 2018 1:54:31 PM Jeremy, We would like to submit a public comment regarding the 2040 comprehensive plan that will be submitted for final approval at the December 2018 city council meeting. We have reviewed the plan and have serious concerns regarding the level of density that is being proposed in the plan along the Highway 112 corridor. We understand there were requirements by the Met Council to increase the opportunity to provide density, but we are very concerned about a 192 unit apartment building coming into that section of town. Orono simply does not have the infrastructure to support this additional increase. The traffic in the mornings is already a concern due to the high speed limits on highway 112 and highway 6, the two highways surrounding the schools. Adding an additional 100+ cars to this traffic in the morning will cause safety concerns for the students at the Orono Schools. Moreover, Orono does not have services available to support this type of density. We have a co-op that has some groceries, but there is not a full service grocery store, nor is there public transportation. We want to submit this opinion for consideration as developers start to propose developments on these properties that are now zoned for higher density. Most residents of Orono are not aware of these plans. They are not aware of rezoning and what the "opportunity to increase density" means to our rural community. Unless families request this information, it has not been shared broadly with the community. We were only made aware of this due to an anonymous letter that was sent to our residence alerting us to a proposed development in our neighborhood. Orono does not have a downtown; we are a rural community and that is why people choose to live here. Changing the character of Orono by building multi -unit, multi -floor buildings will not be welcomed by most who live in this community. We are just one family voicing our concern because we are aware of the proposed changes and believe they would be significantly detrimental to Orono and its residents. Thank you, David & Stacey Royal 3135 Jamestown Road Orono, MN 55356 952-473-9528 Last year, the city council reviewed the environmental protection plan (EPP) section of the 2030 comprehensive plan, parts of which are incorporated into the 2040 comprehensive plan draft. There is a description of Orono as a "rural oasis." (p. 3A-13, EPP). There is also language about the need to protect the wetlands, not only for their character, but also their role as wildlife habitat and for their filtration function as pollution control (removing phosphorus, etc.). There are remarks about how urbanization directly and disproportionately adds decreased water quality and to eutrophication of lakes, especially, in this case, Lake Minnetonka. Lake Classen and the surrounding wetlands drain into Stubbs Bay. Most of Orono is in the Minnehaha watershed area. There are also discussions about minimizing hardcover run-off, preventing stormwater flooding, and prevention of other pollution, including light pollution that destroys the dark sky. There is a stated desire to protect views, protect trees and wildlife, to maintain the rural nature and appearance of this area and to protect the character of the neighborhoods. These goals are summarized on p.3A-39 of the EPP. It is clear that a lot of work and consideration went into that document. The 2040 plan and the EPP from the 2030 plan both state that the will of the residents of Orono is more important than rapid development or any outside influence. Both documents praise and promote the tendency for slow growth and thoughtfully considered development.(p. 3A-13, EPP) The 2040 plan specifically addresses lakeshore property development on p. 313-12. It seems to be primarily regarding Lake Minnetonka, but should apply to all lakeshore property in Orono. Allowing the construction of either of the two proposed apartment complexes (Eisinger Flats and Orono apartments) runs directly counter to the guiding principles outlined in the Environmental Protection Plan. So one needs to ask, why would the council and planning commission consider these proposals? It is because both the planning commission and the council are pressured the Met Council, which is an unelected body of power hungry individuals who want to push their worldview on everyone else. I am sure you all are aware of the uproar regarding 4-plexes (now tri-plexes) in existing residential neighborhoods. Both the council and the planning commission have to take into account the Met Council growth predictions. Why? What happens if Orono doesn't grow as fast as the Met Council thinks it should? The Met Council is for the urban part of the Twin Cities, not for out here. The Met Council's wishes and goals, are directly opposed to maintaining an open rural feel in a community. Why not let Orono grow organically? Slowly? Interestingly, the Met Council's Storm Water Impact Investigation (1973) notes that 1. "the impact of converting an area of undeveloped land to dense residential use will increase the pollution load from that area by more than ten (10) times." And 2. "The storm water from dense residential areas averages fourteen times greater phosphorus concentrations than the lakes ... [and] these concentrations are over nine times greater than the concentrations associated with nuisance algae blooms."(EPP p. 3A-21) Another question: Who gains from these developments? The developer does. The owner of the giant apartment complexes does. The owner of the land these developments will be built on does. Maybe the city does, because of increased property taxes, although if the land was developed as zoned, it would probably be about the same. If the high density housing brings in lots of children, however, all the city money will go to build more classrooms. Who does not benefit from these developments? The current residents, the people who live here now, who pay taxes now, who live here because they like the way it is. More on the developers: For both projects, both developers are already asking to go higher than the 30 foot height limit. Probably they don't make as much money on a two story building as on a three story building. Yet another question: Why were the households that would be directly affected by these high density projects not officially notified of these projects? Just before the last planning commission meeting, the families in our neighborhood received an anonymous letter about the proposed "Orono apartments." Because of this, I looked on the city website and found, to my absolute astonishment, that this was real. There had been no public communication with any of us in this neighborhood. The only way we found out was through the anonymous letter. The Lake West Development company website promotes this as a done deal. Just as a side note, there was no mention of any of this in the recent Orono City newsletter, either. As you can tell, I am totally opposed to the proposed developments (Eisinger Flats and Orono apartments). They do not belong on the far edge of town, and certainly not on the edge of a protected lake and wetland. There is no transportation, no services, no infrastructure, no cable internet, no sewer or water. If working age people are expected to move in, you know they will not be working in Orono or Long Lake. They will add to the giant traffic jams that are Highways 12 and 6. My understanding from the planning meeting is that Eisinger Meadows is, in fact, a done deal. But Eisinger Flats is not. It does not have to be apartments. It does not have to be anything. We moved to the Orono district about 5 or 6 year ago primarily for the school. We chose the house we purchased because of where it was in the Orono school district. We could have moved into a denser area, but we wanted the open view and open feeling. From the EPP, it is clear that we are not the only ones who prefer a less dense, more rural feel. There are trade-offs for living out here. -- Housing can be expensive. -- Our taxes are very high. -- We have to drive at least 15 minutes to buy many basic things. -- We pay for our own road maintenance, including patching, resurfacing, plowing, etc. -- We are NOT on city water. We have a well that requires an iron breaker, and a water softener at minimum. We also have a Culligan reverse osmosis filter. We have septic/pumping station access to city sewer (previous owner's choice). -- We provide our own security. -- Access to highway 6 is difficult. Hennepin County won't reduce the speed on Hwy 6 (55 mph) as it comes past our road. Most of the traffic is faster than that, as the limit is rarely enforced. Hennepin County apparently requires a certain number of deaths to decrease the speed limits. But we happily do all this in exchange for the open view, the low density, out in the country feeling. When we bought our house, we asked and were informed that Orono had a 2 acre minimum lot size. We also asked and were informed that high density housing was not going to happen around us because of that zoning. At that time, the areas around us were all zoned that way, from what I can tell. We would NOT have bought this house if we thought that we would be near high density housing, because of the associated noise and traffic, and because we don't want that "in the city" feeling. Someone at the planning meeting suggested that this is a NIMBY issue. Not really. In fact, that's pretty offensive. All we really want is for the rules to be followed and to not allow unnecessary projects that will change the character of the town and the neighborhood and violate the zoning and building agreements. The situation is not unlike a family that moves out into the country. If they purchase property near a pig farm, they were aware that it existed and accepted the accompanying odors, etc. Say that they purchase property that is distant from animal farming, specifically because they don't want odors, etc. Should they be unhappy if a factory pig farm wants to locate half a mile or less from their property? Should they protest that the farm is being built? Of course. They made their decision based on what was there, in either case. Will their property values drop? Of course. Will their quality of life diminish? Of course. Will they be compensated? Of course not. The owners of the pig farm should consider the existing landholders' sentiments, and decide if they want to build their facility in a relatively hostile environment. The stated goals of future development in Orono are: 1. "Promote the conservation and enhancement of the quality of surface water and wetlands throughout the city, particularly Lake Minnetonka" 2. "Ensure the preservation and enhancement of the existing "rural character" of the city." (EPP p. 3A-14 and following for the guiding principles.) Impacts: Most of these apply to both proposed developments, but I will specify as appropriate. 1. Environmental Orono's motto and shield show ducks and reeds. Orono calls itself "the Lakeshore City." What has been proposed will dramatically impinge on the wetlands that Orono states that it wants and needs to protect. In fact, the plan shows buildings (Eisinger Meadows and Flats, diagram from the 9/17/18 meeting) overlapping onto the wetland setback. How is that OK? Is the developer expecting that he can fill in some of the setback area? 2. These developments will negatively affect waterfowl nesting places and migratory pathways. There are nesting swans, lots of ducks, loons, and pelicans, which are protected. There are also minnows (no big fish), painted turtles and snapping turtles. The lake is 5 or 6 feet deep at most, with a muddy, mucky bottom and has lots of aquatic plant life. The DNR ratings for it are all "green," instead of "clear." It is not a recreational lake. I have not seen anything about an environmental impact statement. 3. Lake Classen and the surrounding marsh function as an estuary. The area is an important part of the Minnehaha Creek and Lake Minnetonka watershed and keeping pollution out of those bodies of water. 4. Destruction of other wildlife habitat. 5. Quality of life and protected view. In my backyard, I can hear traffic on Wayzata Blvd and highway 12 as a distant hum. I can hear birds and ducks. I can see the stars looking to the west, south and north. Not to the east, because of the school lights. I can see trees and water and sky and eagles and ospreys. I do not want to see apartments and townhouses (loss of view). I do not want to hear them(noise pollution). I have a very stressful job, so I intentionally chose a place which would provide a non -stressful, relaxing environment. Some people want coffee shops, some want to live on Lake Minnetonka, some want to walk, skate or bike around the chain of lakes. Some people like Uptown and the North Loop. My neighbors and I wanted peace and quiet. 4. Building on a landfill --speaks for itself. Is it stable? What happens to all the toxic materials when this is disturbed? This has not been looked at as of the 10/15/18 meeting. 5. Construction pollution—all the dirt, earth moving, noise, exhaust. 6. Water pollution --the proposals have asphalt parking, which of course produces lots of dirty, oily, salty runoff. The undeveloped land absorbs the rain. Asphalt parking lots do not. Rooftops with asphalt shingles do not. The EPP acknowledges that urbanization increases the amount of stormwater runoff. Salt and grit from the parking lots and roads in these areas will wash directly into the marsh, wetlands, Lake Classen and finally Lake Minnetonka. (p. 3A-45) 7. Proposed underground parking? Seriously? In a marsh? The EPP makes note that many areas near lakeshores and "any of the wetlands, wet organic soils often have perched water tables within three feet of the surface."(EPP p. 3A-9) 8. Sewer? How will that get there --through the marsh? If and when there is a leak or a break, raw sewage will discharge into the wetland and the watershed. The EPP states that the city recognizes that extending sewer lines to an area sometimes makes things worse. 9. Water supply --well vs. city water. The well water is hard and has tons of iron; who is going to condition it? Or is the city going to pipe water out there? 10. General pollution—how will you prevent random trash that didn't make it into the dumpster from ending up out in the lake and wetlands? How about tenants who decide to leave their couch behind instead of moving it? 11. Air pollution --estimated 378 cars for Eisinger Flats. Heating and cooling for 192 units. Another estimated 576 cars for Orono apartments, heating and cooling for 288 units. 12. Noise pollution --construction, cars, noise of people living, their music, air conditioners, etc. 13. Light pollution --building and parking lot lights, on all night for security. What about the dark sky that the EPP promotes and expresses a desire to preserve? 14. Preservation of views—promoted in the EPP. One or two three story apartment buildings will certainly change the view. As a side note, I do not think the short berm with half dead trees around the David Weekly development just south of the school is a good view. I think the pasture was better. 15. Preservation of trees. The Lupient property (Orono apartments) is full of trees, as is the old apple orchard. Cutting them down to make way for high density housing does not preserve them. 16. Preservation of existing landmarks. Apple orchard? 17. Increased traffic—An estimated 954 cars between the two developments. Wayzata Blvd at that location is too small to handle that amount of traffic. It is too small to handle the extra 378 from Eisinger Flats. Making the road bigger will cause more negative impact on the wetland, although I understand that that project will occur sometime. 18. Increased traffic on highway 6 will make it more difficult for us and others to get onto Highway 6. It is difficult to get onto highway 6 from our road now. We are near a blind curve, and the cars go by at around 55 mph or more. The proposed high density housing will bring more speeding traffic by our road, because it will be even more difficult to get onto highway 12, which will make it nearly impossible to exit from our road. It will also increase the traffic by the school, which is already congested, despite the recent revamp. 19. Increased traffic in general and congestion—more accidents, potentially lives lost. 20. And where will all these people work? Not in Orono. Not in Long Lake. More commuters on the road, more car exhaust, more car accidents. 21. Between these two developments, at least 1000 more people will be concentrated in this small area. Approximately 400 or more for Eisinger Flats, and 600 for Orono apartments. Orono's population in 2017 was about 8000. Is it reasonable to concentrate a 15% population increase in such a small space? 22. Too many children for the Orono schools to absorb. There is not enough physical room for that many children. Class sizes would have to increase, thus causing reduction in the quality of the education the children now receive. Dumping that many new students will destroy the excellence of the school. 23. These developments will stretch the Orono police force, or require that it be enlarged. 24. This significantly changes the character of the neighborhood and surrounding area. This takes away from our neighborhood. 25. Property value --high density housing across the lake will significantly diminish the value of our property. This includes not only financial value but also loss of quiet enjoyment of our property. It takes away the privacy of our back yard. It takes away peace and quiet. Will Orono compensate us for the loss? 26. Decreased security, caused by increased exposure of our property 27. Zoning for higher density housing in Orono/Long Lake is present for the open parcels along Kelley parkway, where there is already sewer and water access, cable internet. There are no wetlands to destroy. These areas should provide enough opportunity for growth to satisfy the Met Council. From the data presented at the planning commission meeting, neither the Eisinger Flats nor the Orono apartments development is necessary. 28. The land on the south edge of Lake Classen is already zoned for 2 acre lot minimum. Why not keep it that way? Why not let Orono/Long Lake develop naturally instead of forcing artificial growth that cannot be handled by the existing infrastructure, the natural environment, the schools and local employment? We really just want the existing zoning to remain the same for the land around and on Lake Classen and the surrounding wetlands, and to prevent high density housing from coming into an area that cannot sustain it and that will be irreparably harmed by it. We feel that the proposed Eisinger Flats development is the wrong type of development for Orono/Long Lake. A high density project such as Eisinger Flats is too large for the area for which it is proposed—too much hardcover, too many people, too much traffic, too much pollution. It will not enhance the Orono community. It will detract from it. Another zoning question—the new zoning map shows that the area around Lake Classen is zoned as urban residential. Why not rural residential (1 unit per 2 acres)? The area around Lake Classen is not urban and is certainly of a rural character. According to the 2030 EPP, "Lake Classen, in Orono's rural area, is surrounded by orchards, woods and open fields with a handful of homes overlooking its waters. The Orono School District maintains a nature study area and waterfowl ponds on Classen's east shore."(emphasis added, p. 3A-4, EPP). The phrase "rural area" has been deleted from the 2040 plan. Merrill and Heidi Cole From: andy oagel2age To: Denny Walsh; Jeremy Barnhart; victoriaseals(agmail.com Cc: Julie image Subject: 2040 comprehensive plan public opinion Date: Sunday, November 11, 2018 3:50:54 PM Dear council members, We would like to comment on the density plans for Orono over the coming years. We moved to Orono in 1999 because of the schools and the rural landscape which our family has enjoyed for nearly 20 years. We were informed of a 2 acre minimum which was in place which at the time made us feel secure that the community would not ever look like Maple Grove appears today, which happened very quickly. We, along with many members of our community, have been alarmed that prospective developers can just ask for variances to build more homes on smaller lot sizes if the council decides to grant such variances. Why were the zoning laws ever put in place from the beginning if variances are going to be given out to change them? In the last 20 years, class sizes in the school have ballooned from low 20's to the mid 30's and housing developments with 3 houses per acre are popping up. It is also my understanding that the school is currently full and that there is a desire to keep the high school to be under 1,000 students. There is also the hot topic of what the Met Council may want vs. what the members of the community want. Part of the issue is that many members of our community have no idea what the Met Council does and how they can influence development plans in rural communities. I did not move to Orono to have an appointed (not elected) Met council member who doesn't live in Orono tell us how to develop our community. What if we do not take their money? Can we refuse to listen to them if we do not take their money? I would be happy to pay slightly higher property taxes if we can govern ourselves without being governed from the outside. We understand the need to grow, but the town must grow smartly, and within its means. Developments plans need to be aligned with the desire of the community members and the ability of the towns infrastructure of roads and schools to handle the population growth. Many families move here for the tranquility and large lot sizes, not cookie cutter neighborhoods with 3-4 homes per acre or a 280+ unit development on 14 acres of property overlooking a marshland and a 190 unit development proposal just west of the schools on county road 12. These proposals and building projects have alarmed many in our community and we are asking that these concerns will be respected and considered by our city council. Thank you for your consideration, Andy & Julie Page 3050 Jamestown Rd. Orono Adams Remarks at Orono City Council Meeting October 10, 2016 My name is Tim Adams. In 1969 Mary & I came to Orono, to a 70 -acre Dairy Farm on the NW corner of Long Lake, property adjacent to the proposed Larsen/Mabusth development. Schools, were important (and I hope everyone will support the coming Referendum!). But of equal importance was Orono's "Rural" environment — open fields, rolling hills, native woodlands, and a natural habitat for birds & critters. And of course, Long Lake and its watershed of ponds, streams, and wetlands. All distinctive features of this Neighborhood, which includes the Larsen/Mabusth properties. In 1974, 1 became the "Developer" of the Farm at Long Lake in Partnership with John Hartwell. John had grown up on The Farm and shared my desire to preserve the areas natural beauty and live within Orono's "Rural" Zoning and Development Guidelines. We did not ask the city to change the rules to accommodate our development. Forty-two years later, we consider the Farm a successful "Rural" development — 24 Lots on 70 acres. Perhaps not the most profitable development at a density of 3 acres/lot, but a development that "followed the rules": • No changes to Orono's Comp Plan, Zoning, and City ordinances. • Protected Long Lake and its watershed of ponds, streams and wetlands. • Preserved Rural open spaces, woodlands, and views. • Met standards for private septic systems in Rural areas. • Reduced costs to the City with private roads built to city specifications From 1979 thru 1986 1 was privileged to serve on the Orono Planning Commission and City Council. I sat in your chairs and participated in the shaping of Orono's Rural development policies. For which I understand the proper term is "semi -rural" From our recent analysis of public records (a copy of which you have been given) I can identify 52 lots adding up to approximately 180 acres developed in the Neighborhood surrounding the Larsen/Mabusth properties. These include lots in Homestead (6), Salem Court (7), Dickey Lake (15), Shadowood (17) and other properties along Brown Road North (7). The average density of these lots is approximately 3.5 acres/lot. We have not included Sugar Woods, (density of 1.3 acres/lot) in this analysis of Neighboring Rural development for the following reasons: • There were no Lakeshore or watershed issues in Sugar Woods. • Sugar Woods is heavily wooded, due partly to the developer's planting the open fields with pines to strengthen his argument for rezoning to from 2 acre minimum to 1 acre minimum and exception from the requirements for private septic systems. Page 1 Adams Remarks at Orono City Council Meeting October 10, 2016 • The development plan includes significant setbacks from Brown Road and immediate neighbors. • Sugar Woods is adjacent to Hgwy 12 and abuts commercial zoning. won't take your time tonight to list the many Neighborhood concerns of the proposed average density of .95 units/acre for the Larsen/Mabusth properties 1. How many years of construction and how will City manage? 2. How many more cars on Brown Road? 3. How many more boats and docks on Long Lake? 4. What is environmental impact on Long Lake and how can we trust the "experts"? 5. Is this the end of Private Roads and Orono Septic System Policies and what is impact on City Finances? 6. What will happen to property values in the Neighborhood? 7. What impact will higher density development have on our Schools? You've heard these questions before when you consider changes to Zoning in a fully developed neighborhood. They are important, particularly when one considers how much rural property remains undeveloped in Orono. No, I want to focus on one question — Density (Slide showing site plan and density calculations) We really have two development concepts going on in this 25 -acre property. The 1" is one we could come to love —6 lots on 10.9 acres (1 unit/1.8 acres) • Lakeshore & lots buffering Neighbors come close to meeting current zoning and Watershed Requirements • City sewer and storm water mgmt. plans to protect Long Lake. • A few developer "cheats", but City Staff can manage o Wetlands & storm water structure in "buildable" calculations 0 50' vs 60' ROW for streets o Flexibility to move lot lines/adjust setbacks to accommodate developer o No final approval from MCWD Page 2 Adams Remarks at Orono City Council Meeting October 10, 2016 But the Balance of the property —19 lots on 10 buildable acres (1.9 units/acre) comes from another playbook. This is not Rural Orono, this is not even Semi Rural Orono. By the consultants own calculations, Half the property (10 acres) will have 1 house/2 acres; the other half, 2 houses/1 acre. Listen carefully, sounds pretty close - but the proposed density on 50% of the property is actually 4x greater than that proposed for the Balance of the property and 4x greater than what has come to be known as "Semi Rural" Orono. This is not the neighborhood we have lived in for 47 years, this density is not in any way similar to The Farm at Long Lake or any of the other residential development in Neighborhood. And contrary to the consultant's assertions, the only way this proposal can "meet the rules" is to "change the rules." I would quote from Staff comments: "the proposed plan would require rezoning and an amendment of (Orono's) Comprehensive Plan." If questions remain, I invite any Council Member to visit our Neighborhood and share more than time tonight allows. On behalf of many who live in the Neighborhood surrounding the Larsen/Mabusth properties, we are asking you, the City Council to give specific direction to the property owners to revise their proposal to live within the existing Zoning and Comp Plan requirements. We would expect this to save considerable time and dollars for the City, the Neighborhood, and property owners. Page 3 November 13.. 2018 Jeremy Barnhart, Community Development Director City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono. MN 55356 RE: Preliminary Review of the City of Orono 2040 Comprehensive Plan Metropcfitan Council District 3 Metropolitan Council Review Pile No. 22055-0 Dear Mr. Barnhart: Metropolitan Council staff have reviewed the preliminary draft of the City of Orono's 2040 Comprehensive Plan (Plan), received on August 27, 2018. In the preliminary review, staff focused on whether the draft Plan appeared to be complete and contained any major system issues or policy conflicts Time did not permit as thorough of a review as will occur when the Plan is officially submitted for Council review. A more detailed review may reveal other important matters that were not identified during this preliminary review. When addressing the matters in this letter. City staff are advised to refer to the City's Checklist of Minimum Requirements in the Community pages of the online Local Planning Handbook and the City's System Statement: City of Orono's Checklist of Minimum Requirements: htt s:✓/rrietrocouncil. or lHandbookIFiles✓CI)ecklist✓O2396081 Orcing Checklist. as x City of Orono's Community Page. htt s:✓✓! hot?line.metc.state.mn.us✓CommPa e?ctu=2396081&a licat3t=Orono City of Orono's System Statement: htt s:✓✓metrocouncil.or ✓Communities✓Plannin ✓Local-Plannin -Assistance✓S stem - Staten? ents✓S stem-Statements✓02396081 Orono 2015SS. as x The preliminary review process found the following sections complete for review and did not identify any major system issues or policy conflicts: Aggregate Resources. Surface Water Management. and Solar Access. Surface (Nater Management (Jim Larsen, 651-602-1159) The Plan is complete for review based on the requirement for preparation of an updated Local Water Management Plan (LWMP) element. If available at the time the City submits its formal Plan, we request the City provide the complete final LWMP in an Appendix in the Update and a Water Resources summary in the body of the Update (as was done in this preliminary review submission). incorporating any recommended revisions from the review of the draft LWMP. If available at the time the formal Update is submitted. we also request that the City provide to the Council the date the Watershed District approved the LWMP, and the date the City adopted the final LWMP 390 Robert Street North I Saint Paul, MN 55101-1805 P. 651.602.1000 1 TTY. 651.291.0904 l metrocouncil.org ' r An Equal Opportunq Employer Jeremy Barnhart Orono November 13. 2018 Page 2 of 9 Solar Access Protection and Development (Camerao Bailey. 651-602-1212) The Plan is complete and consistent with statutory requirements (Minn. Stat. 473.859. Subd 2; Section 1038.235) and Council policy regarding planning for the protection and development of access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Per the authority available to the state by way of Minn. Stat 500.30. Council staff recommend developing a process for recording solar easements as a 'solar strategy to support the City's Community Planning, Natural Resource Management. and Environmental Protection solar access policies. Council staff also suggest enrolling in the following cost-free programs, which are designed to provide planning, technical, and policy assistance to local Minnesota governments. as additional "solar implementation strategies" in your Plan • U.S. Dept. of Energy s SolSmart Program - Solar Permitting. Zoning. and Development • MN GreenStep Cities Program — Sustainability Best Practices The following sections of the draft Plan are considered incomplete. Changes in the draft Plan are definitely needed before the Plan is submitted to the Council for formal review. Community Wastewater Treatment and Subsurface Sewage Treatment Systems (SSTS) (Jim Larsen, 651-602-1159) The Plan is incomplete for SSTS. To be complete for review. the Plan needs to address the following issues The Plan indicates that there are currently 1029 SSTS in operation in the City. The table of contents on page 1 of Part 4B directs the reader to Appendix C for a map of the locations of all individual SSTS in operation in the City. This map was not included in this preliminary submission and must be included for the Plan to be complete. Council staff requests that the City confirm (either in their response to our preliminary review or in their formal Plan submission) that there are no public or privately -owned Community Wastewater Treatment Systems other than the indicated 1.129 individual SSTS in operation in the City or incorporate a short discussion of any existing operating facilities and a map depicting their location The formal Plan submission will need to include ;he Part 413. Appendix C map depicting the location of all individual SSTS in operation in the Cry. including highlighting any areas known to have nonconforming systems or systems with known problems. If the City or its planning consultant needs any assistance in the preparation of this map for their formal Plan submission. please contact Steve Hack. MCES GIS System Administrator at 651-602-1469 or Steven. Hack@metc. state. m n. us. Wastewater (Roger Janzig. 651-602-1119) The Plan is incomplete for wastewater. To be complete for review, the Plan needs to address the following Items: :D Please include an electronic map or maps (GIS shapefiles or equivalent) showing the following information regarding the existing sanitary sewer system: • Lift stations. ■ Existing connections points to the metropolitan disposal system. Jeremy Barnhart, Orono November 13, 2018 Page 3 of 9 • Future connection points for new growth if needed. • Local sewer service districts by connection point. • Intercommunity connections. Please include a copy of intercommunity service agreements entered into with an adjoining community, including a map of areas covered by the agreement. o Include a table or tables that provide the following local system information for: • Capacity and design flows for existing trunk sewers and lift stations. o Describe the sources. extent, and significance of existing inflow and infiltration in both the municipal and private sewer systems. • Include a breakdown of residential housing stock age within the community into pre- and post -1970 era and what percentage of pre -1970 era private services have been evaluated for 1/1 susceptibility and repair. • Include the measured or estimated amount of clearwater flow generated from the public municipal and private sewer systems. • For quantifying Ill, some communities have used the EPA guidance to determine the annual Ili and peak month III https://www3.epa.gov/region1/sso/pdfs/Guide4EstimatingInfiltrat onInflow pdf o Describe the implementation plan for preventing and eliminating excessive inflow and infiltration from entering both the municipal and private sewer systems • Include the strategy for implementing projects. activities, or programs planned to mitigate excessive 1/1 from entering the municipal and private sewer systems. ■ Include a schedule and the related financial mechanisms planned or needed to implement the III mitigation strategy. Include a map or maps (GIS shape files or equivalent) showing the following information: • Location of sub -surface sewage treatment systems. ■ Location of nonconforming systems or systems with problems Forecasts (Todd Graham. 659-602-1322) The Plan is incomplete for citywide employment forcasts. TAZ allocation of forecasts. and employment -bearing land use intensity The Plan includes the Metropolitan Councils households and population forecasts, but does not use Metropolitan Councils employment forecast (table 2.2) The City's reason for using a lower employment forecast is not given. the City could request a lower forecast but has not. For completeness. the final Plan submittal must include the Metropolitan Council's employment forecast. Metropolitan Council's forecasts are: Metropolitan Council Forecast: Orono 2020 2030 2040 Population 7437 7691 8100 8800 9500 Households 2826 3037 3200 3560 3900 Employment 1562 1579 1700 1780 1800 Jeremy Barnhart, Orono November 13, 2418 Page 4 of 9 The Metropolitan Council requires that 2020. 2030.. and 2040 forecasts be assigned transport analysis zones. or portions of TAZs within the city boundaries. Chapter 4A (Transportation Plan) includes TAZ allocations with a total that is substantially higher than city total forecasts. Summary of the 21 TAZs provided in Orono's Chapter 4A. Appendix A. Population 12837 13490 14430 15270 Households 5186 5690 6220 6700 Employment 4180 4230 4570 4830 Council staff expect that the employment and population are in error due to including Long Lake and portions of other neighboring cities. Council staff advise City staff that in TAZs shared with neighboring cities, totals should include only the portion within Orono. The sum of TAZ allocations should match the city total forecast. The City can consult a preliminary TAZ allocation, split by city. available here: haps.-14gisdata.mt7.govldatasetltts-mn-state-mete-tratrs- anl ys-zones-frest-taz-com. Finally, the Metropolitan Council requires some rreasure of employment -bearing land use intensity. Acceptable measurements of intensity inc ude Floor Area Ratio (FAR) or building footprint. This was not found in the preliminary Plan Update and must be included for the final Plan submittal to be considered complete Based on information included in table 313-1. the City estimates, from its utility accounts that Orono in 2016 was already at 2.253 sewer -services households. Council staff suggested that the City request that the sewer -serviced forecast be re -benchmarked to stage more growth in the MUSA portion of Orono; and less growth in the rural portion. This is recommended, but not required. Land Use (Jake Reilly. 651-602-1822) The Plan is incomplete for Land Use. To be complete the following items must be addressed Existing Land Use c The Plan provides the Metropolitan Council s 2016 Generalized Land Use map (Map 3B- 1) and a reinterpretation of this map with additional categories (Map 38-2, page 170 in the PDF). To be complete, all Land Use maps must be consistent throughout the Plan. Council staff recommend that City staff remove Map 313-1. * It is difficult to distinguish between Island Residential and Undeveloped on the Existing Land Use map (Map 313-2). Planned Land Use The Plan needs to consistently use allowable density ranges among its descriptive text and tables. • Table 38-4 identifies several propert.es as having a minimum density of eight (8) units per acre. yet the descriptive text and the accompanying proposed land use maps do not contain a guided land use with that minimum density. • Similarly. the text for Urban High Density Residential indicates a density range of 20-25 units per acre. yet Table 38-5 uses a category called "High' with a minimum density of 10 units per acre. To provide clarity, Council staff Jeremy Barnhart. Orono November 13. 2018 Page 5 of 9 recommend using the complete names of the guided land use categories in Table 313-5. and breaking down the Area summaries by guided land use. Table 3B-4 needs to provide some additional clarity. It is unclear what numbers are captured in the 2020-2030 Growth and 2030-2040 Growth columns -- it appears that this is housing units. However, there are some rows where the total housing units in these growth columns does not equal the minimum density multiplied by the net acres (the Eisinger row for example) Please clarify these columns. Council staff suggest identifying available acreages in this table by decade rather than total units by decade. particularly for properties whose development may fall in both decades. Alternatively the table could provide both. c Table 38-4 shows decades 2020-2030 and 2030-2040. Council staff recommend that the columns be adjusted to 2021-2030 and 2031-2040 so as not to double count years. * Map 38-4 needs to identify the location of Area F that is described in Table 3-413. c The Urban Medium High/Mixed Use Residential description on page 16 of Part 3B needs to include an estimated percentage of the breakdown of residential and non-residential land uses. The narrative indicates that existing residential development cannot convert to commercial development. but that existing commercial development could convert to residential. It is unclear whether the properties identified in Table 313-4 are intended to entirely develop as residential. or whether some mix of commercial and residential will occur on the variety of properties identified. and if so. what that mix is. To be complete. the allowed uses and allowed densities by use are required to be listed in the table. o There is a green hatching on the map that is not defined in the legend (it is likely a wetland overlay). The map legend must include a definition for the hatched areats). o For clarity Council staff recommend adding parcel boundaries to the maps in the land use and sewer chapters o The Development Areas shown on Map 3B-4 in the Appendix (page 174 in the PDF). are described as locations that could accommodate the City's forecasted growth by 2040. Nearly half the area identified is established lake -side sewered estates. Council staff recommend that the City confirm that The Plan identifies that half of the City's forecasted growth will occur on existing developed land that is unswered. If this is not accurate. the Plan must demonstrate that the forecasted growth will occur in the areas of Orono that are served by sewer o Table 313-3: Orono Planned Land Use Summary is missing the total acres for each land use and percent of total acres of reach land use for each decade. Housing (Hilary Lovelace. 651-602-1555) The Plan is incomplete for review Inconsistent items and advisory comments are also described below. Existing Housing Needs The number of housing units affordable to households with incomes at or below 30% of AMI. between 31 and 50% of AMI, and between 51 and 80% AMI must be provided. The number of housing units affordable to each income band are available in the Existing Dousing Assessment in the Local Planning Handbook (link: httos //mefrocouncil. org/Har7dbook/Fites/Existing-Housitip- Assessment/02396081 Orono Existin Hs .as x) Jeremy Barnhart. Orono November 13, 2018 Page 6 of 9 c To be complete. the narrative analysis of existing housing needs in Housing Needs Identification on page 11 (Part 3C) must connect these identified needs to the data presented in the previous section of the Housing Plan, like the number of housing cost - burdened households with income at or below 30% AMI (148) or the lack of any subsidized affordable housing to the tools available to address them Council staff recommends including these in Table 36-4 along with the changes listed below. Tools to Address Housing Need • The City's share of projected need for additional affordable housing in the 2021-2030 decade is inaccurately described. To be complete. the Plan will need to acknowledge the City's share of projected housing needs in the region. which is 154 units. With regard to adopting affordable housing goals for eligibility in Livable Communities Act programs. 2021-2030 affordable housing goals will be negotiated in the next few years. Language on page 3C. page 12 confuses the two measures and Council staff recommend editing it for clarity. o As noted in the Land Use section above. changes are need in Table 3113-4 to provide additional clarity for land use and housing purposes c The 4(d) tax program description on is inaccurate To be complete the Plan must state that the 4(d) program provides a 40% tax break to property owners of affordable housing that is available when the local government provides some financial assistance to the project. Complete plans will link too3s to stated housing needs and describe the circumstances in which they would be considered. o Some widely used tools to address affordab:e housing needs are not included in the Plan. To be complete. the Plan needs to state if. and if so when and why. it would consider using each tool to address housing needs. The tools that require more context including the use of an Housing and Redevelopment Authority, housing bonds. tax abatement. tax increment financing. and community land trusts. Resources for these opportunities include c, Housing and Redevelopment Authority: (https llmetrocoerr7Cil.org/Har7dbook/Files/ResourceslFact-S)7eetJHOUSINGICittr- Developmer7t-Powers-to-Create-Legal-Er7tities. aspx) o Housing Bonds: 17tf,os.-Ilmetrocouncil orqlHar7dbooklFiles/Resource_sl_Facf- Sheet/HOUSINGf_Mi7r7ici,oal-Bot?d-Isst7ance. asp? Community Land Trusts are described in the Plan. and it is stated that Orono may evaluate joining the West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust. To be consistent. the Plan must identify how a ;and trust could be used to meet needs. and Council staff recommend that the City commit to evaluating participation in or creation of a community land trust. • A full list of housing tools and resources can be found in the Local Planning Handbook ( https./Imetrocouncil.org Handbook/FileslResourceslFact- S17eeVH0USING/Recogr7ized-Tools-arid-Resources. aspx) Advisory Comments c Table 3C-7 Housing Cost Burden Households has numbers that are inconsistent with Table 5 Housing Cost-Burndened Households in 2016 from the Existing Housing Assessment in the Local Planning Handbook. Jeremy Barnhart, Orono November 13. 2018 Page 7 of 9 (httpsJ/metrocouncii org/Handbook/Files/Existing-Housing- Assessment/02396081_Orono_ Existing Hsg. aspx) * The description of the Livable Communities Grants is incorrect on Part C3 -Page 11. For more information on how to create a complete and consistent implementation plan, including examples. please refer to the Linking Tools to Needs resource in the Local Planning Handbook (link: https,//metrocouncil.org/Handbook/Files/Resources/Fact- Sheet/HOUSING/Linking-Tools-to-Needs.aspx) c. Are rental housing units rising in Orono (Part 3C, page 7) due to recent development or are existing homes (largely single family) becoming investor-owned and rented? It isn't necessary to know this. but if the trend is known this would be great information to include in the narrative analysis of existing housing needs. It would be especially interesting to know if the rental SFH stock was valued significantly higher or lower than the average of owner -occupied units o With respect to a Fair Housing policy. local fair housing policies do not mean that cities should or can manage or administer Fair Housing Complaints. Rather. a local fair housing policy ensures that the city is aware of fair housing requirements with regard to housing decisions and provides sufficient resources to educate and refer residents who feel their fair housing rights have been violated (this can be as simple as having links to resources on the City's website). The Metropolitan Council will require a local Fair Housing policy as a requirement to draw upon Livable Communities Act (LCA) awards beginning in 2019. To learn more, please review the following resources: • Creating a Local Fair Housing Policy webinar: https-.//www. youtube. com/watch?v=38JY4pNGnZ8&feature=youtu. be ■ Best Practices: https://metrocouncil.org/Handbook/Planit/FilesWebinar-Fair- Housing-Handout2.aspx ■ Policy Template: https//metrocouncil.org/Handbook/TrainingWebinars.aspx - click on Handout 1 under the Implementing A Local 'Fair Housing Policy at the bottom of the screen c In part 3C, Page 6. there is a sentence that begins "In today's market. affordable housing and many forms of lifecycle housing are only feasible at urban densities.. This is not completely true. Housing common in rural areas, like manufactured housing or small single family homes offer affordable housing opportunities outside of an urban context. c, The allocation of affordable housing need is described several times as a goal in the Plan. To be clear. the allocation is not a goal; it is a forecast of actual households expected to come to the region at various income levels. Cities must plan for that allocation per the Metropolitan Land Planning Act. but are not responsible for creating those units. On the other hand, the Council negotiates affordable housing goals with cities that participate in Livable Communities Act programs. Staff suggests that the Plan be consistent in text and the table with when land is expected to develop. Land that develops before 2021 cannot be considered guided land for the allocation of affordable housing need for 2021-2030 A sentence on Part 3C. page 7. indicates that land guided to meet Oronos share of new affordable housing units is available for development immediately. If Orono believes that some of this land will develop before 2021it would be wise to guide land such that Orono still has enough to provide their share of allocated need. Jeremy Barnhart; Orono November 13, 2018 Page 8of9 The section on NSP Grants is outdated as all NSP dollars are currently being spent down. if Orono is using NSP dollars, it is appropriate to describe how they might be spent down in the near term. * Staff suggests mentioning specific energy assistance programs available in the area and which types of dwellings (single vs multi -family) and tenure (ownership vs rental) the programs are applicable to. Implementation (Jake Reilly. 651-602-1822) The Plan is incomplete for review. In order to be complete. a timeline of when actions will be taken to implement each required element including a schedule for updating of any official controls must be included. Regional Parks and Trails (Jake Reilly, 651-602-1822) The plan is incomplete for Regional Parks and Tra ls, Table 4E-3 Regional Facilities includes facilities that are not part of the Regional Parks and Trails system. To be complete, the Parks and Trails map in the Appendix to Part 4 must have the correct names of the Regional Parks and Trails facilities and must include the relevant Regional Trail Search Corridors, The Regional Parks, Park Reserves, and Special Recreation Features in Orono are- o Lake Minnetonka Islands Regional Park o Baker Park Reserve o Noerenberg Gardens (a special recreation feature) o Dakota Rail Regional Trail Lake Independence Regional Trail The map and chapter must also describe and identify the two Regional Trail Search Corridors in the City o Lake Independence Extension Regional Trail Search Corridor o North-South 1 Regional Trail Search Corridor Those items listed in Table 4E-3 as Regional facilities or regional parks. but not listed above should be moved to a different table or referred to ccrrectly as other facilities, including the Luce Line State Trail. which is not referenced correctly in the text in Part 3B Page 6 or in Table 4E-3. Regional Facilities. Council staff recommend reviewing the System Statement and/or the Regional Parks Policy Plan for current policy and recommended maps and language. Transit (Steve Mahoviald. 612-349-7775) The Plan is incomplete for Transit. To be complete for review. the Plan needs to address the following issues: • The Plan needs to identify existing and planned transit advantages within the City. • The Plan needs to reference to Transit Link dial -a -ride service provided within the City Jeremy Barnhart, Orono November 13, 2018 Page 9of9 Transportation/Aviation (Russ Owen. 651-602-1822) The City s Comprehensive Plan is incomplete for Transportation. In order to be complete the Plan needs to address the following issues. There is a text reference to Figure T-5 containing 2040 forecast data in the Table of Contents for the Transportation Section and on Part 4A. Page 11. However. there is no figure T-5 and none of the transportation maps in the document have 2040 forecast data. To be complete the Plan needs to map 2040 forecast data. The Plan must also map current heavy commercial traffic volumes on principal and A -minor arterials within the City.The Plan must identify future rights-of-way that needs to be preserved To be complete. the Pian needs to include the following regarding the Regional Bicycle Transportation Network (RBTN). • The Plan needs to include a map and description of on -road bicycle facilities within the City • The Plan needs to include a map and description of the Regional Bicycle Transportation Network within the City including Showing all Tier 1 and Tier 2 RBTN corridors and alignments within the City Showing the relationship of the RBTN to the local bicycle network of off-road trails and on -street bikeways including all existing and planned connections. Mapping the locations of regional employment clusters and activity centers nodes. as shown on the Metropolitan Council's RBTN map, and other activity centers. o For Tier 1 and/or Tier 2 corridors on the RBTN. describing and mapping the existing or planned bicycle facility alignments that are within established corridors that are proposed to fulfill the intent of the RBTN. To be complete. the Plan also needs to include the identification any local roadway issues or problem areas for goods movement, such as weight -restricted roads or bridges. bridges with insufficient height or width clearances. locations with unprotected road crossings of active rail lines. or intersections with inadequate turning radii. In summary. the submitted draft Plan is missing a number of items and may require revision. If you have any questions or need further information regarding the comments in this letter. please contact Jake Reilly. Principal Reviewer at 651-602-1822 *Lisath rD a�as,evel CC Jennifer Munt. Metropolitan Council District 3 Jake Reilly. Sector Representative/Principal Reviewer Raya Esmaeili, Reviews Coordinator N 1Conim0evlLPAlcommunitieslOrono4Electroiiic Referrals12018 CPU Preliminary reviewlCJrono_2018 CPL! Prelim2040.docx Major changes identified. Not intended to be a comprehensive list. 2040 Comprehensive Plan differences from 2030 Plan 2030 Plan 2040 Plan Area Use designation Density range Use designation Density Range Reason Lake Minnetonka islands Parks/ Open Space Parks, Rural Preserve 1 unit/ 5 acres Reflect actual land use Kelley Parkway Office Urban High Density 20-25 u/a Appropriate density location Long Lake Firestation area High Density Residential 10-15 u/a Urban Medium Density 3-10 u/a Inappropriate Density Navarre Low -Medium Density 2-3 u/a Urban Medium Density 3-10 u/a Reflect development pattern, match LR -1C zoning district. .5 acre minimum lot size North of Long Lake Lake Low Density Residential 0.5-2 u/a Urban Low Density 0.5-2 u/a Differentiate the MUSA between 2 acre zones Shadywood south of dentist Mixed use retail 6-15 u/a Commercial Navarre Area Plan Schools and churches Institutional Various Maintain consistency between land use categories South of Fox Street, north of Lake Minnetonka Low Density Residential 0.5-2 u/a Urban Low Density 0.5-2 u/a Differentiate the MUSA between 2 acre zones Major changes identified. Not intended to be a comprehensive list. Minimum Requirement Checklist City of Orono CHECKLIST OF MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS FOR ORONO Requirement Pages Maps/ Tables LAND USE Forecasts and Community Designation Include a table of forecasted population, Table 2-2, households, and employment for 2020, 2030, and Table 2-8, 2040, consistent with the Council's forecasts. Table 313-1, Remember, Council forecasts must be used consistently Table 313-4 throughout your entire comprehensive plan. Your transportation plan needs to allocate forecasts to transportation analysis zones(TAZs). Your water and wastewater plans need to reflect forecasts to plan for urban services. Your land use plan must reflect and be coordinated with yourforecasts. Include a map acknowledging your regional Community Fig 3C-1, Designation(s) and acknowledge the overall density Map 3C-3 expectations for your Community Designation(s). Each Community Designation identifies both Council and Community Roles in Thrive's land use policy section. Plans must be consistent with Community Roles for your Community Designation(s) as well as Community Roles that apply to everyone. Existing Land Use Provide an Existing Land Use Map with a land use legend. Map 3B-2 and Map 3B -2a Provide an Existing Land Use Table. Calculate total acres 313-15 Table 313-2 and percent of total acres for each land use category. Land uses categories on the map and in the table, as well Noted as any text references must all be consistent with one another. Future Land Use The Future Land Use plan must be consistent with the 313-15 to 25 Council's forecasts of population, households, and employment and identify sufficient land to support your community's forecasted growth. Provide a Future Land Use Map and land use Map 313-3a legend, including density ranges for all land uses and Map that allow residential development. 313-3b Provide a Future Land Use Table. Calculate total acres 313-18 Table 313-3 and percent of total acres for each land use category for each 10- year planning period(2020, 2030, and 2040). Define each land use category shown on the 313-18 to 22 Future Land Use Map. Land use categories must be used consistently throughout your plan. Land use categories must include types of allowed uses 313-18 to 22 and the minimum and maximum densities ("the allowable density range") for all categories that allow residential Page 1 Minimum Requirement Checklist City of Orono uses. Allowed uses should include a description of allowable housing types such as single family, detached, duplexes, townhomes, etc. Identify employment locations and provide a For each "mixed use" category, define an expected share 313-19 measurement of intensity of planned employment. of individual land uses and identify the permitted density Employment locations are typically the areas guided for range for residential uses. For example, Mixed Use commercial, office, industrial and institutional uses. Downtown might have an expectation of 30% commercial, Acceptable measurements of intensity include Floor 40% office, and 30% residential with a density of 10-15 Area Ratio (FAR), building footprint or impervious units per acre. coverage. Ranges for measuring intensity are Acknowledge Council -approved master plan boundaries Map 313-3a of regional parks, park reserves, and special recreation For Communities with Special Resources: features by guiding the properties with a land use of See the Special Resources section within the Land Use N/A "Park" (or your equivalent) on your Future Land Use Map. Plan Element for requirements for Critical Area Plans, For Communities within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA): Identify employment locations and provide a Page 313-19 Map 3B -3a measurement of intensity of planned employment. Employment locations are typically the areas guided for commercial, office, industrial and institutional uses. Acceptable measurements of intensity include Floor Area Ratio (FAR), building footprint or impervious coverage. Ranges for measuring intensity are acceptable. For Communities with Special Resources: See the Special Resources section within the Land Use N/A N/A Plan Element for requirements for Critical Area Plans, Historic Preservation, and others. Density Calculations Identify where forecasted residential growth will Map 313-4 happen on your Future Land Use Map. Show expected new development and re -developed areas. Identify what density range is expected for each residential Pages 313-18 to 22 Map 3133a land use in yourcommunity. and 313-3b Identify when residential development or 313-25 redevelopment is anticipated to happen. See the Handbook section on Staged Development and Redevelopment. The average net residential density for your 313-29 Table 313-5 community must be consistent with the density requirements for your community designation. Provide a minimum and maximum value for each 313-18 to 22 Map 313-3a residential density range. (Zero is not an acceptable minimum. The maximum value must be a whole number.) Use the lowest allowed residential density from land use Table 313-4 ranges in your calculations. For example, a land use that permits a density range of 3-5 units per acre must use 3 units per acre in all density calculations for this land use. This ensures that even at the lowest permitted density, the community will be developing at densities that meet overall density expectations. Focus on areas of change. Show us which planned land Page 313-22 uses have changed from your previously approved plan Page 2 Minimum Requirement Checklist City of Orono and where new land uses (change or development with Orderly Annexation Agreements (OAAs): intensity) are planned/expected. Map stages of development in 10 -year No staged development Provide the net developable acreage for each increments (existing, 2020, 2030, and 2040). Table 313-3 residential land use. It's OK to exclude wetlands and Provide a table of staged development in 10 -year for entire natural water bodies, public parks and open space, increments. The table must include future land uses, city, Table arterial road rights-of-way, and natural resource lands area in acres, density ranges, and total residential 3B-4 for protected by local plans and ordinances (i.e. steep units by each 10- ear time increment. Planned slopes, wetland buffers, tree preservation) from area Natural Resources development calculations. Stormwater ponds, utility easements, Chapter 3A areas local roads, and local rights-of-way cannot be excluded from area calculations. The information you develop in your land use plan Comment noted All plans must include a protection element for historic carries over to other elements of your comprehensive sites. plan. The areas and densities in the land use plan must be consistent across elements related to forecasted growth, wastewater, water, housing, and transportation. For Communities with an Affordable Housing Allocation: Guide residential land at densities sufficient to create 3C-11 Table 313-4 opportunities for affordable housing using one of the following options outlined in the Housing Plan Element. Refer to the Projected Housing Need section. Staged Development and Redevelopment Identify potential local infrastructure impacts for each 10- Pages 313-21-24 Table 313-4 year increment. Demonstrate that the municipality is capable of providing Page 313-24 services and facilities that accommodate its planned growth. The staging plan or likely development phasing must No staging plan be consistent with the volume of anticipated sewer flow identified in your community's Local Sewer Plan. The staging plan or likely development phasing Table 313-4 must support and be consistent with your community's share of the Region's Need for Affordable Housing for 2021 -2030. For Suburban Edge, Emerging Suburban Edge, Rural Centers, and Communities with Orderly Annexation Agreements (OAAs): Map stages of development in 10 -year No staged development increments (existing, 2020, 2030, and 2040). plan Provide a table of staged development in 10 -year Table 313-6 increments. The table must include future land uses, area in acres, density ranges, and total residential units by each 10- ear time increment. Natural Resources Describe your community's goals, intentions, and Chapter 3A priorities concerning preservation, conservation, or restoration of natural resources in your community. Special Resource Protection All plans must include a protection element for historic 313-33 sites. Page 3 Minimum Requirement Checklist City of Orono All plans must include policies for the protection and 3A-15 Table 3A-4 development of access to direct sunlight for solar Include a table allocating forecasted population, energy. Solar access is addressed in depth under the household, and employment growth by TAZ using the Resilience section. Official TAZ system with 3,030 zones for 2020, 2030 All plans must identify whether or not aggregate 3A-10 and 2040. resources are available within the community. For Describe how you have allocated demographic growth communities with aggregate resources, additional based on your plan's assumptions for guided future requirements apply. land use (e.g., density, mix of uses, locations for new TRANSPORTATION Transportation Analysis Zones Include a table allocating forecasted population, Appendix 4A -A household, and employment growth by TAZ using the Official TAZ system with 3,030 zones for 2020, 2030 and 2040. Describe how you have allocated demographic growth 4A-3 based on your plan's assumptions for guided future land use (e.g., density, mix of uses, locations for new development, highway/transit access, redevelopment, etc.). When doing your land use planning, accommodate Chapter 3B, 4A-3 development densities around transit consistent with density expectations established in Chapter 3 of the 2040 Transportation Policy Plan (2040 TPP). Describe and map the functional classification 4A-4 Figure 4A-1 of all existing and proposed roads within your community, using the functional classification system described in Appendix D of the TPP and the roadway classification map currently recognized in the region. Maps must reflect the principal arterials adopted as 4A-1 the metropolitan highway system in the 2040 Transportation Policy Plan (2040 TPP). If a community determines that a change to the A- N/A minor arterial system in the community is warranted, a request should be made to the Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) for the change, and TAB's approval secured, prior to reflecting the new classification in the community's plan. Check the council's website or contact Elaine Koutsoukos at 651-602-1717 for more information. Maps should also show the streets classified by Map 4A-2 the community as major and minor collectors and local streets. Changes to these streets from the function shown on the regional map are at a community's discretion, and do not need approval from TAB. However, these changes should follow the criteria laid out in Appendix D of the TPP and maintain system continuity. A map 4A-1 or table highlighting any discrepancies between the community's map and the regional functional classification map previously referenced should be submitted to Council Page 4 Minimum Requirement Checklist City of Orono staff so the regional map can be updated. Include the following information for the principal and A- 4A-5 Table 4A-2 minorarterials: Identify the existing and future number of lanes. Map current traffic volumes, including heavy Maps 4A-4 commercial volumes, which include both ADT and and 4A-7 HCADT. Map forecasted 2040 traffic volumes. (This should Map 4A-5 be done using the Council's regional model, or another method with approval from Council forecasting staff.) Identify future rights-of-way that need to be 4A-12 preserved. Identify planned improvements to principal arterials as There are none planned shown in the Current Revenue scenario of the 2040 in Orono. TPP. For other proposed interchange N/A improvements, follow the Highway Interchange Request Criteria and Review Procedure, which can be found in Appendix F of the 2040TPP. Identify any existing or proposed future N/A MnPASS lanes, dedicated busways and bus -only shoulder lanes as shown in Figure 6-4 of the 2040 TPP. Incorporate access management guidelines of 4A-13 to 14 MnDOT, or those of the county in which your community is located, into your comprehensive plan as well as into your subdivision and zoning ordinances. Describe recommendations from recent 313-22 (Navarre Area corridor studies regarding roadway Plan) improvements, changes in land use, and/or access. Transit The region has established Transit Market Areas to guide 4A-22 Map 4A-7 the types and levels of transit service that are appropriate for efficient and effective services. Transit Market Areas are defined in Appendix G of the 2040 TPP by the demographic and urban design factors that are associated with successful transit service. Identify your community in relationship to your transit market area(s). Describe and map the existing and planned transit infrastructure and services in your community, including those of Metro Transit or other regional transit service providers. Communities should include the identification of the following basic elements of the transit system in their comprehensive plan: Existing transit routes and dial -a -ride services 4A-23 Existing and potential high -frequency transit routes Existing and planned transit stations and transit centers Map 4A-7 Page 5 Minimum Requirement Checklist City of Orono Existing and planned park -and -rides and express bus corridors Existing and planned transit advantages Existing transit support facilities N/A Bicycling and Walking Describe and map the existing and planned on -road and Map 4A-6 off-road bicycle facilities in your community. Analyze and address the need for local bicycle and 4A-17 pedestrian facility improvements to provide connections over major physical barriers (i.e., freeways, railroad corridors, rivers and streams) on the regional (RBTN) and local networks. Map and describe the Regional Bicycle Transportation Map 4A-6 Network (RBTN) within your community: Show all Tier 1 and Tier 2 RBTN corridors and alignments. Show the relationship of the RBTN to the local bicycle 4A-6 network of off-road trails and on -street bikeways including all existing and planned connections. Include locations of regional employment clusters and activity center nodes (as shown on the RBTN map) and N/A other local activity centers. For Tier 1 and Tier 2 corridors on the RBTN, describe and 4A-6 map the existing or planned bicycle facility alignments that are within the established corridors; the purpose of these corridors is as a placeholder for cities/counties to designate a planned alignment. If there is a planned alignment that would fulfill the intent of the corridor and that lies within and in line with the corridor's directional orientation that the community would propose to replace the established corridor, map that alignment and denote by indicating it as "proposed for the RBTN." Discuss pedestrian system needs in a manner that 4A-16 to 17 responds to your community designation (as described in Thrive MSP 2040) and addresses the needs of your community. Aviation Identify policies and ordinances that protect regional 4A-23 airspace from obstructions. Include how your community will notify the FAA of proposed structures. Recognize seaplane use on surface waters as 4A-22 designated and regulated by MnDOT; communities should recognize these areas on plan maps where appropriate and consider issues of land use compatibility. Map any facilities such as radio beacons or other air N/A navigation aids sited in off -airport locations and address how they will be protected from physical encroachment and electronic interference through your local ordinance and notification processes. Yours stem statement will Page 6 Minimum Requirement Checklist City of Orono indicate whether your community hosts one of these facilities. A table that details the households and employment Freight Table 4134 Identify railways, barge facilities and truck or intermodal 4A-22 freight terminals within the community. Identify other important nodes that may generate freight 4A-22 movement, such as industrial parks and large shopping areas. Identify any local roadway issues or problem 4A-22 areas for goods movement, such as weight - restricted roads or bridges, bridges with insufficient height or width clearances, locations with unprotected road crossings of active rail lines, or intersections with inadequate turning Map 413-1 radii. Map the road network showing volumes of multi- Map 4A-8 axle trucks (also known as "heavy commercial average annual daily traffic or HCAADT") for Principal Arterial and A -Minor functional 413-15 to 413-16 classifications. WASTEWATER Areas Served by Local Wastewater Treatment Systems A table that details the households and employment Pages 413-7 to 413-11 Table 4134 forecasts in 10 -year increments through 2040, based on the Council's forecasts and any subsequent negotiated modifications. This should be broken down by areas served by the Metropolitan Disposal System, locally owned and operated wastewater treatment systems, and Community an d Subsurface sewage treatment systems. The forecasts used in your wastewater plan must be consistent with the forecasts used throughout your plan, including in land use, transportation, and water supply. Map the local wastewater service areas in your community Map 413-1 through 2040, including a staging plan if applicable, and any proposed changes in governmental boundaries affecting the community, including any areas designated for orderly annexation. Describe the implementation plan for preventing and 413-15 to 413-16 eliminating excessive inflow and infiltration from entering both the municipal and private sewer systems. • Include the strategy for implementing projects, activities, or programs planned to mitigate excessive 1/1 from entering the municipal and private sewer systems. • Include a list of priorities for 1/1 mitigation projects Appendix 5-A based on flow reduction, budget, schedule, or other criteria. Page 7 Minimum Requirement Checklist City of Orono • Include a schedule and the related financial mechanisms planned or needed to implement the 1/1 mitigation strategy. Describe the requirements and standards in your 413-15 to 16 community for minimizing inflow and infiltration. Include a copy of the local ordinance or resolution that Appendix 413-13 prohibits discharge from sump pumps, foundation drains, and/or rain leaders to the sanitary sewer system. Include a copy of the local ordinance or resolution Appendix 413-13 requiring the disconnection of existing foundation drains, sump pumps, and roof leaders from the sanitary sewer system. Copy of any intercommunity service agreements entered Appendix 4B -D into with an adjoining community after December 31, 2008; including a map of areas covered by the agreement. Copies of the associated National Pollutant Discharge MS4 permit provided as Elimination System (NPDES) or State Disposal System Appendix 4B -C (SDS) permits. An electronic map or maps (GIS shape files or equivalent must also be submitted) that show the following information: Your existing sanitary sewer system identifying lift stations, Map 413-3 existing connection points to the metropolitan disposal system, and future connection points. Map 413-1 Local sewer service districts by connection point. Intercommunity connections and any proposed changes in N/A government boundaries based on Orderly Annexation Agreements. The location of all private and public wastewater treatment N/A plants in your community. Current subsurface sewage treatment system ordinance Appendix 413-A A table or tables that contain the following information: Capacity and design flows for existing trunk sewers and lift Table 413-8 stations. Assignment of 2040 growth forecasts by Metropolitan interceptor facility. In the absence of this information the Council will make its own assignments for the purpose of system capacity needs determination. a Community and Subsurface Treatment Systems A table that details the households and employment 413-7 forecasts in 10 -year increments through 2040, based on the Council's forecasts and any subsequent negotiated Page 8 Minimum Requirement Checklist City of Orono modifications. This should be broken down by areas served by the Metropolitan Disposal System, locally 3A-12 to 13 owned and operated wastewater treatment systems, and Community and Subsurface sewage treatment Page 3A-12 to 3A-14 systems. The forecasts used in your wastewater plan must be consistent with the forecasts used throughout Appendix your plan, including in land use, transportation, and 3A-1 water supply. Describe your community's management program for Map 413-3 SSTS to comply with MPCA regulations (Minn. Rules Chapters 7080-7083). Map the locations of all sub -surface sewage Map 4134 treatment systems. You should also identify the Appendix locations of known non -conforming systems or 3A-1 systems with known problems. Describe the conditions under which private, 4B-7 community treatment systems (ex. package treatment plants, community drainfields) would be allowed. Examples of such Describe the existing physical environment and conditions include: existing land use. You may be able to incorporate ❑ allowable land uses and residential densities data by reference if allowed by the appropriate ❑ installation requirements watershed organization(s) plan. You should be aware ❑ management requirements that not all watershed plans contain the level of detail ❑ local government responsibilities Current subsurface sewage treatment system ordinance Appendix 413-A SURFACE WATER Executive Summary, Water Resource Management 3A-12 to 13 Related Agreements, and Amendment Process Provide an executive summary that includes the highlights Page 3A-12 to 3A-14 of the local water management plan. Describe the water resource management related Appendix agreements that have been entered into by your 3A-1 community. This includes joint powers agreements related to water management that the community may be a party to between itself and watershed management organization(s), adjoining communities, or private parties. Include a section on amendment procedures that Appendix defines the process by which amendments may be 3A-1 made. The amendment procedure must be consistent with the amendment procedures in the watershed organization(s) plans that affect your community. Physical Environment and Land Use Describe the existing physical environment and Chapter 3A, 3A-1 to 21 existing land use. You may be able to incorporate data by reference if allowed by the appropriate watershed organization(s) plan. You should be aware that not all watershed plans contain the level of detail Page 9 Minimum Requirement Checklist City of Orono needed and in those cases, you will be required to provide this information directly in your local water If the community has a municipal community public management plan. water supply system, complete all information in the Describe the proposed physical environment and future Appendix 3A-1 DNR & Metropolitan Council water supply plan land use. template. Information must be submitted in the Include a map and/or description of drainage areas 3A-1 shows watersheds template provided and submitted through the that includes path and flow directions of the MnDNR Permit and Reporting System (MPARS). stormwater runoff in your community. Include extended water demand projections for 2020, Describe the volumes and rates of flow for those defined Appendix 3A-1 2030, 2040 and ultimate build -out that are consistent drainageareas. Existing and Potential Water Resource -Related Problems Include an assessment of the existing water resource 3A-2 to 6 related problems in yourcommunity. Include an assessment of the potential water resource 3A-2 to 6 related problems in your community. Include a list or map of impaired waters within your Tables 3A-2 community as shown on the most current 303d impaired and 3A-3 waters list. Local Implementation Plan/Program Include prioritized nonstructural, programmatic, and Appendix 3A-1 Surface structural solutions to identified problems. Water Management Plan Describe the areas and elevations for stormwater Appendix 3A-1 Surface storage adequate to meet performance standards or Water Management Plan official controls in watershed organization(s) plan. Define the water quality protection methods that would be Appendix 3A-1 Surface adequate to meet performance standards or official Water Management Plan controls. Clearly define the roles and responsibilities of the Appendix 3A-1 Surface community from that of the WMO(s) for carrying Water Management Plan out implementation components. Describe the official controls and any changes needed to Appendix 3A-1 Surface official controls. Water Management Plan Include a table briefly describing each Appendix 3A-1 Surface component of the implementation program that Water Management Plan clearly details the schedule, estimated cost, and funding sources for each component, including annual bud ettotals. Include a table describing the capital improvement Appendix 3A-1 Surface program that sets forth by year, details of each Water Management Plan contemplated capital improvement that includes the schedule, estimated cost, and funding source. WATER SUPPLY Local Water Supply Plan for Municipal Public WaterSuppliers If the community has a municipal community public 4C -Appendix 2 water supply system, complete all information in the DNR & Metropolitan Council water supply plan template. Information must be submitted in the template provided and submitted through the MnDNR Permit and Reporting System (MPARS). Include extended water demand projections for 2020, Tables 4C-5 2030, 2040 and ultimate build -out that are consistent Page 10 Minimum Requirement Checklist City of Orono with population forecasts in the community's system and 6 statement. If no portion of the Regional Parks System falls within your Page 3C-12 Water Conservation & Reuse community, state that fact in your comprehensive plan. If the community has a municipal community public 4C -Appendix 2 Describe, map, and label the federal and state water supply system, complete all information in the Map 4E-1 recreational lands within your community, as DNR & Metropolitan Council water supply plan 3C-7 shown on your System Statement. template. Information must be submitted in the Acknowledge the Council -approved master plan template provided and submitted through the Map 313-3a boundaries of regional parks, park reserves, and special MnDNR Permit and Reporting System (MPARS). 3C-3 recreation features by guiding the properties with a land Assessing & Protecting Source Water If the community has a municipal community public water 4C -Appendix 2 supply system, complete all information in the DNR & Metropolitan Council water supply plan template. Describe and map your existing and proposed local parks, Information must be submitted in the template Map 4E-1 trails, and recreation facilities. provided and submitted through the MnDNR Permit Include a capital improvement program for parks and open and Reporting System (MPARS). Appendix 5A space facilities as part of your implementation program. Sub -Regional Collaboration If the community has a municipal community public 4C -Appendix 2 water supply system, complete all information in the DNR & Metropolitan Council water supply plan template. Information must be submitted in the template provided and submitted through the MnDNR Permit and Reporting System (MPARS). PARKS AND TRAILS Regional Parks and Trails If no portion of the Regional Parks System falls within your Page 3C-12 Map 4E-1 community, state that fact in your comprehensive plan. 3C-2 Describe, map, and label the federal and state Map 4E-1 recreational lands within your community, as 3C-7 shown on your System Statement. Acknowledge the Council -approved master plan Map 313-3a boundaries of regional parks, park reserves, and special 3C-3 recreation features by guiding the properties with a land use of "Park" (or your community's equivalent) on your Future Land Use map. Local Parks and Trails Describe and map your existing and proposed local parks, Map 4E-1 trails, and recreation facilities. Include a capital improvement program for parks and open Appendix 5A space facilities as part of your implementation program. HOUSING Existing Housing Needs Complete an existing housing assessment, including: Page 3C-12 A table of existing local conditions, including the 3C-2 following information: 1. Total number of housing units. 3C-7 2. Number of housing units affordable to households with incomes at or below 30% Area Median Income (AMI), between 31 and 3C-3 Page 11 Minimum Requirement Checklist City of Orono 50% AMI, and between 51 and 80% AMI. 3C-2 3. Number of housing units that are owner occupied. 3C-2 4. Number of housing units that are rental. 5. Number of single family homes. 6. Number of multi -family homes. 7. Number of publicly subsidized housing 3C-8 units by the following types: senior housing, housing for people with disabilities, and all other publicly subsidized units. Include expiration dates of affordability requirements when applicable. 8. Number of existing households that are experiencing housing cost burden with incomes at or below 30% Area Median Income (AMI), between 31 -50% AMI, and 51 -80% AM I. A map of owner -occupied housing units identifying their Fig 3C-2 assessed values. At a minimum, differentiate the values above and below $211,500. A narrative analysis of existing housing needs. At a 3C-12 minimum address the components of the existing housing assessment within the local context of your community. Plans consistent with Council policy will clearly identify existing housing needs and priorities for the community. Projected Housing Need Discuss how the land use plan addresses the future 3C-12 housing need for your forecasted growth. For Those Communities With An Affordable Housing Need Allocation: Acknowledge your community's allocation of the region's 3C-11 need for affordable housing at three levels of affordability: <30% AMI, 31-50% AMI, and 51-80% AMI. Guide residential land at densities sufficient to create 3C-11 Table 313-4 opportunities for affordable housing using one of the following options: Option 1: Guide sufficient land at minimum residential densities of 8 units/acre to support your community's total allocation of affordable housing need for 2021 — 2030. This option may be best for communities that find it difficult to support densities of 12 units/acre (per Option 2), or prefer simplicity over flexibility in their density minimums. Option 2: Guide sufficient land at minimum residential densities of: 12 units/acre to address your community's allocation of affordable housing need at <50% AMI. This combines your community's allocation at <30% AMI and 31-50% AMI. 6 units/acre to address your community's allocation of affordable housing need at 51-80% AMI. Page 12 Minimum Requirement Checklist City of Orono Option 2 may be best for communities that feel they can achieve affordable housing needs at 51- 80% AMI with less than 8 units/acre. It also allows the affordable housing need to be addressed with less actual land, as is the case if communities choose to use even higher densities than are required. Furthermore, communities using Option 2 may guide land to meet their allocation of affordable housing need at 51-80% AMI using a minimum density range of 3-6 units/acre if they have demonstrated in the last 10 years the application of programs, ordinances, and/or local fiscal devices that led to the development of housing affordable at 51-80% AMI in their community. Examples include: density bonuses for affordable housing unit inclusion, local funding programs such as TIF, etc. Implementation Plan A description of public programs, fiscal devices, and 3C-16 to 17 other specific actions that could be used to meet the existing and projected housing needs identified in the housing element. Include in what circumstances and in what sequence they would be used. Plans consistent with Council policy will clearly and 3C-16 to 17 directly link identified needs to available tools. Needs are identified within the three levels of affordability, and tools should therefore be addressed within the levels of affordability as well. Plans consistent with Council policy will consider all widely 3C-16 to 17 accepted tools to address their housing needs. A list of widely accepted tools is provided, however, this list is not exhaustive. Communities are strongly encouraged to include any additional tools at their disposal when identifying how they will address their housing needs. RESILIENCE Energy Infrastructure and Resources Local governments in the seven -county metropolitan area 3A-15 are required by state law to include an element in their Plan for protection and development of access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Solar Resource Protection: Include your community's Figure 3A-2 Minnesota Solar Suitability Analysis Map. This is available on your Community Page_ Solar Resource Protection: Include calculations of your Table 3A-4 community's gross solar and rooftop solar resource. This is available on your Community Page. Solar Resource Development: Include a policy or policies Page 3A-16 to 17, 19, 22 relating to the development of access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Solar Resource Development: Include strategies needed Pages 3A-16 to 23 to implement the policy or policies. Page 13 Minimum Requirement Checklist City of Orono ECONOMIC COMPETITIVENESS Redevelopment Minnesota Statutes § 473.859 Subd. 1 states that local Preservation: Chapter 2 comprehensive plans "shall contain objectives, and 3A and 3B. policies, standards, and programs to guide... Redevelopment Chapter redevelopment and preservation for all lands and 313-20 waters within the jurisdiction of the local governmental unit". IMPLEMENTATION Implementation Describe all public programs, fiscal devices, and other 5-5 to 5-7 actions that your community will use to implement your plan. Define a timeline as to when actions will be taken to 5-5 implement each required element of your comprehensive plan. Include a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for Appendix 5A transportation, sewers, parks, water supply, and open space facilities. Specify the timing and sequence of major local public investments. The CIP must align with development staging Comment noted identified in other parts of your plan and include budgets and expenditure schedules. Describe all relevant official controls addressing at least 5-5 zoning, subdivision, water supply, and private sewer systems. Include a schedule for the preparation, adoption, and 5-5 administration of needed changes to official controls. Include your local zoning map and zoning category Map 5-1 descriptions. Identify what changes are needed to ensure zoning is not in conflict with your new land use plan and consistent with regional system plans and policies. Review and update official controls within 9 months of Noted adopting your 2040 plan. Official controls must not be in conflict with your updated plan. You must provide copies of all revised official controls to us. The Housing Plan Element has implementation Noted requirements as well. Refer to that section to ensure that implementation requirements for the Housing Action Plan are met. Page 14 AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 29 Date: December 10, 2018 Item Description: LAI 8-000084 — City of Orono, Text Amendment: Land Alterations Presenter: Laura Oakden Agenda Planning Department Planner Section: Report To adopt the proposed ordinances and summary ordinance regarding changes to Chapter 78- land alterations and grading and Chapter 79- permitting and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) requirements. 2. Background/ Summary. Applicants are often confused by the existing language and are unclear what regulations apply when it pertains to their project. Further, staff occasionally will discover a CUP is required during the building permit review, stalling that building permit unit a CUP is issued (6-8 weeks later). Simplifying the City Code will clarify the process pertaining to land alteration permits and help streamline the permitting process. The Planning Commission reviewed the intent and purpose of grading and land alterations which include: • To manage stormwater discharge, ensuring drainage does not negatively impact neighboring properties. Manage hauling traffic and noise. Preventing erosion issues into adjacent properties, wetlands, lakes, and road. Through updating and revising the Zoning Chapter 78 regarding land alterations, the City Engineer suggested we alter Chapter 79 to be consistent within the City Code and align with MCWD permitting regulations. Summary of Changes: • Allowing some common land alteration permits to be administratively reviewed to expedite projects and still ensure the proposed grading meets city standards. • No longer classifying land alterations as a Conditional Use Permit, but processing them as an Interim Use Permit, to allow a sunset date for these activities. Procedurally, it is the same, Planning Commission public hearing and City Council decision. • Edit the City Code to clarify land alteration standards and conditions • 78-1126 (3) requires a CUP for the cumulative placement of more than 1,000 cubic yards of fill when the fill is not being used to elevate the structure in accordance with the Flood fringe permitted uses. Per the suggested draft ordinance, the cumulative import/export of material over 500 cubic yards of material trigger an IUP. This lowers the threshold for projects requiring Council review. • Alter permitting standards in Chapter 79, to have the soil volumes and area be consistent with Chapter 78 and MCWD. Summary Table: Land Alteration Activity Permit Type Code Section What changed Import/export of more IUP 78-1726 (a)6 -Formerly required a than 500 CY of material CUP -Clarified the trigger is hauling on/off site Import/export of less Building Permit/ or 78-1591 (a)1 -Clarified the trigger than 500 CY of material Land Alteration 78-1591 (a)2 is hauling on/off site Permit Prepared By: LLO Reviewed By: J. Barnhart Approved By: AGENDA ITEM Grading more than 50 IUP 78-1726 (a)4 -CUP CY within a shore -Formerly was setback limited to 75', no matter the lake Grading more than 50 Building Permit/ or 78-1591 (a)7 -updated amounts in CY or 5000 sq.ft outside Land Alteration Chapter 79 to be of the shore setback Permit consistent with Ch 78 and MCWD regulations Grading less than 50 CY Building Permit/ or 78-1591 (a)3 -Formerly was within the shore setback Land Alteration limited to 75', no Permit matter the lake Grading less than 50 CY No Permit Required 78-1591 (a)3a. No Change on a property outside of the shore setback Stockpiling more than IUP 78-1726 (a)5 -No current language 500 CY of material Repair failed Shoreline Building Permit/ or 78-1591 (a)4 -Formerly required a Land Alteration CUP Permit Mining IUP 78-1726 (a)1 -CUP 3. Planning Commission Vote and Comment. The Planning Commission discussed changes to land alterations and grading at the October Planning Commission Meeting. The Commissioners reviewed a draft ordinance at the November Planning Commission Meeting. They discussed the proposed changes and gave an unanimous recommendation for approval. 4. Public Comment. No public comments were submitted. COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Council should consider adopting or amending the two proposed draft Ordinances and Summary Ordinance; three separate motions are requested. Exhibits A. Draft Ordinance Chapter 78 B. Draft Ordinance Chapter 79 C. Draft Summary Ordinance D. PCSR November 19, 2018 References PC Exhibits A. Draft Ordinances B. Current City Code C. PC Packet Item from 10. 15.19 Prepared By: LLO Reviewed By: J. Barnhart Approved By: ORDINANCE NO. , THIRD SERIES CITY OF ORONO HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES PERTAINING TO LAND ALTERATIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF ORONO ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Section 78-947. -Mining shall be amended by adding and deleting text to read as follows: Sec. 78-947. — Intentionally left blank nn SECTION 2. Section 78-948. —Soil Processing shall be amended by adding and deleting text to read as follows: Sec. 78-948. — Intentionally left blank o n eGescinn SECTION 3. Article V. Conditional uses, Division 3 —Requirements for specific uses, Subdivision 11 —Land Alterations shall be deleted in its entirety SECTION 4. Section 78-1286. —Topographic alterations/grading and filling shall be amended by adding and deleting text to read as follows: Sec. 78-1286. - Topographic alterations/grading and filling. (a) Grading and filling and excavations necessary for the construction of structures, sewage treatment systems, and driveways under validly issued construction permits for these fanisimprovements do not require the issuance of a separate grading and filling permit. However, all grading and filling activity as a part of approved permits for construction of structures, sewage treatment systems, and driveways shall adhere to the grading and filling standards of this article. (b) Grading, filling or excavating of more than 50 cubic yards is prohibited without an Interim Use Permit within 75 foot of the erdinary high water le the shore setback of the public waters enumerated in section 78-1217. (c) New Public and private roads, driveways, parking areas, and public or private watercraft access ramps shall not be constructed within 75 foot of the ordinary high water log e4 the shore setback of the public waters enumerated in section 78-1217. If no alternatives exist, such improvements shall be subject to the standard zoning variance review procedure, and such review shall take int„ aGGe int the felle ,ing Gensideratiens consider the following: (1) Such improvements shall be designed to take advantage of natural vegetation and topography to achieve maximum screening from view from public waters. (2) All roads and parking areas shall be designed and constructed to minimize and control erosion to public waters consistent with the requirements of all agencies with jurisdiction and in accordance with City Code Chapter 79. (d) Except for those projects requiring permits for construction of structures, sewage treatment systems and driveways, an administrative land alteration permit will be required as follows: (1) For movement of up to 50 cubic yards of material within 75 foo+ of the eFdinar„ high watep levelthe shore setback as per item (b) above, shall be required. (2) Fer meyemont Import/export of 51 through 500 cubic yards of material anywhere within the Shoreland Overlay District, except for within 75 foot of the ordinary high water level the shore setback. a staff _issi ed land alte Fatinn permit shall be req aired. (3) Fer Fn eve rnentlmport/export of more than 500 cubic yards of material within the Shoreland Overlay District, interim use permit approval by the city council is required in addition to the administrative land alteration permit. (e) Permits are issued based on the applicant's ability to meet and adhere to the following standards: The followingGenrsidera-tiens and Gendirtlions must be adhered to during the Genditienal use permits, intefim e use Permot, variannos and subdivision appFeyals• (1) Grading or filling in any type 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 or 8 wetland must be evaluated to determine how extensively the proposed activity would affect the following functional qualities of the wetland: a. Sediment and pollutant trapping and retention; Storage of surface runoff to prevent or reduce flood damage; c. Fish and wildlife habitat; d. Recreational use; e. Shoreline or bank stabilization; and Noteworthiness, including special qualities, such as historic significance, critical habitat for endangered plants and animals, or others. This evaluation must also include a determination of whether the wetland alteration being proposed requires permits, reviews or approvals by other sections of city ordinances or by other local, state or federal agencies including but not limited to watershed districts, state Ddepartment of Nr}atural Rr-esources, or the United States Army Corps of Engineers. (2) Alteration activities shall be in accordance will City Code Section 79-9 Minimum SWEEP Best Management Practices (BPMs). ^ lteratigns must be designed and Gond Gted in a (5) AlteFed areas must be stabilized to aGGeptable eFOGOOR GORtF91 standaFds GE)RsisteRt With Kited States SEA GGRsep,iatinn Serviro Q3 4 Fill or excavated material must not be placed in a manner that creates an unstable slope. (47) Plans to place fill or excavated material on steep slopes must be reviewed by the city engineer for continued slope stability and must not create finished slopes of 30 percent or greater. (59) Fill or excavated material must not be placed in bluff impact zones. (69) Any alterations below the ordinary high water level of public waters must first be authorized by the commissioner of the department of natural resources under Minn. Stat. § 103G.245. (74-9) Alterations of topography must only be allowed if they are accessory to permitted, of conditional use- orinterim use and do not adversely affect adjacent or nearby property. (844) Placement of natural rock riprap, including associated grading of the shoreline and placement of a filter blanket, is permitted if the finished slope does not exceed three feet horizontal to one foot vertical, the landward extent of the riprap is within ten feet of the ordinary high water level, and the height of the riprap above the ordinary high water level does not exceed three feet. A riprap permit shall be obtained per the requirements of section 78-969. (f) Excavations where the intended purpose is connection to a public water, such as boat slips, canals, lagoons and harbors, are prohibited above the ordinary high water level. Such excavations below the elevation or the ordinary high water level are subject to approval of the Ddepartment of Nnatural Rr-esources and other agencies with concurrent jurisdiction. (Ord. No. 101 2nd series, § 1(10.56(16)(J)), 2-24-1992; Ord. No. 127 2nd series, § 8, 7-11- 1994; Ord. No. 163 2nd series, § 3, 12-8-1997; Ord. No. 171 2nd series, § 2, 4-4-1998; Ord. No. 28 3rd series, § 17, 8-22-2005; Ord. No. 133 3rd series, §§ 2, 3, 1-26-2015 SECTION 5. Article X. —SUPPLEMENTARY REQUIRMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS Division 7. —GRADING AND LAND ALTERATIONS shall be amended by adding and deleting text to read as follows: Article X. —SUPPLEMENTARY REQUIRMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS DIVISION 7. —GRADING AND LAND ALTERATIONS Section 78-1590 Purpose The purpose of this section is to promote the health, safety, and welfare of the community and to establish reasonable uniform limitations, standards, and controls for land alterations, excavating, filling and grading within the city. The regulations will allow the city to better manage stormwater discharge, ensuring drainage does not negatively impact neighboring properties, manage hauling traffic and noise, and prevent erosion issues onto adjacent properties, wetlands, lakes, and roads. Section 78-1591 Administrative Permit Required A plan showing proper drainage and protection of adjoining properties shall be submitted. The City Engineer shall have the authority to refer any requests for land alteration permits to the city council for review and approval in instances where the land alteration appears to create negative impacts or be inconsistent with the goals and policies of the community management plan. (a) An active building permit or separate land alteration permit for the following: (1) Normal and customary grading in the area of an existing or a newly constructed building; or the grading of the driveway serving such building; and less than 500 cumulative import/export of material, except for fill required to raise grade for adequate frost footing protection, the intent being that structures shall not be artificially raised above the preexisting surrounding topography. (2) Import/export of 51- 500 cubic yards which does not adversely impact the existing drainage, (3) Changing the grade on a lakeshore property within the shore setback up to 50 cubic ay rds. a. Exception. A building permit or land alteration permit is not required for earth movement 50 cubic yards or less outside the shore setback. (4) Repair or restoration of grade within the shore setback provided import/export does not exceed 500 cubic yards to reestablish existing/ failing slope with engineer review. (5) Stockpiling less than 500 cubic yards of material provided that the following documents be submitted: a. An erosion control plan, meeting the standards of Chapter 79; and b. Proposed haul routes. (6) Installation of septic systems in accordance with Chapter 58 —Environment Article II. — On -Site Sewage Disposal. (7) Grading, excavation, or fill which is greater than or equal to 50 CY or 5,000 square feet. Section 78-1592 Shoreland Management and Floodplain Management Additional requirements for grading and land alterations may apply to projects within the Shoreland Overlay District in City Code Section 78-1286 and Floodplain Management areas under City Code Article VIII. Section 78-1593 Interim Use Permit Requirements Interim Use Permits may be reauired for laraer aradina and land alterations Droiects outlined in Citv Code Section 78-1726. SECTION 6. Article XIV. —INTERIM USES Division 1. —GENERALLY shall be amended by adding and deleting text to read as follows: ARTICLE XIV. - INTERIM USES DIVISION 1. - GENERALLY Subdivision I. —Land Alterations Section 78-1725 Puroose and Intent The purpose of this section is to promote the health, safety, and welfare of the community and to establish reasonable uniform limitations, standards, and controls for land alterations, excavating, filling and grading within the city. The regulations will allow the city to better manage stormwater discharge, ensuring drainage does not negatively impact neighboring properties, manage hauling traffic and noise, and prevent erosion issues onto adjacent properties. wetlands. lakes. and roads. Sec 78-1726 Interim Use Permit Reauired An application for an interim use permit shall be accompanied by a certified site plan showing the location of the proposed excavation or storage and shall state the amount of material which is to be removed, excavated or stored, placed, or graded, and such other information as the council may require. Applications shall be filed with the city administrator and shall be accompanied by a deposit to be determined by the city, which will be used to offset the cost of processing the application. Any unused portion will be refunded to the applicant. (a) Except where otherwise provided in the article, it is unlawful for any person to perform or have performed the following land alteration activities without an interim use permit issued by the council: (1) Mining. The commercial extraction of sand, gravel or other material from the land and their removal from the site without processing shall be mining. In all districts, the conduct of mining shall be permitted only upon issuance of a interim use permit. Such permit shall include, as a condition, a plan for a finished grade which will not adversely affect the surrounding land or development of the site on which the mining is being conducted, and the route of trucks moving to and from the sites. A bond will be required for restoration (2) Soil Processing. The operation of processing of sand, gravel or other material mined from the land shall be permitted only by interim use permit. Such permit shall include a site plan where the processing is to be done, showing the location of the plant, disposal of water, route of trucks moving to and from the site in removing processed material from the site, the condition in which the site is intended to be left upon completion, hour of operation; and such permit shall not be granted for a period of longer than 12 months (3) Creation of an engineered grade for the basis of building height determination outside of a subdivision. (4) Change the grade or shore of lakeshore property within the shore setback, in excess of 50 cubic yards. (5) Stockpiling on site in excess of 500 cubic yards, without an associated building permit. (6) Any import/export of material in excess of 500 cumulative cubic yards, also see City Code 78-1286 (d)(3). (7) Conducting grading or land alterations which result in changes in elevations within five feet of adjacent properties outside of an active building permit. Secs. 78-172-527-78-1744. - Reserved. SECTION 7. EFFECTIVE DATE: This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its passage and publication. ADOPTED this day of , 2018 on a vote of _ ayes and _ nays by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota. ATTEST: Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor Ordinance published in The Laker and The Pioneer newspapers the week of 2018. ORDINANCE NO. , THIRD SERIES CITY OF ORONO HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES PERTAINING TO LAND ALTERATIONS THE CITY COUNCIL OF ORONO ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Section 79-6. - Permit and SWPPP required shall be amended by adding and deleting text to read as follows: Sec. 79-6. - Permit and SWPPP required. (a) Applicability. No owner shall conduct or allow land disturbing activities that meet any of the following criteria without a land disturbance permit and submitting a stormwater pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) pursuant to this chapter. (1) Land disturbance greater than or equal to one acre or which will be part of a larger common plan or development that will include land disturbing activities greater or equal to one acre. (2) Grading, excavation, fill, which is greater than or equal to ten cubic yards (CY) within the shore setback zone of any lake. (3) Grading, excavation, or fill which is greater than or equal to 2-5 CY50 CY or 5,000 square feet. (b) [Approval.] No building permit, subdivision approval, or other permit that will result in land disturbing activities shall be issued until approval of the stormwater pollution prevention plan or a waiver of the approval requirement has been obtained in conformance with the provisions of this chapter. (c) Exemptions. The provisions of this chapter do not apply to: (1) A project for which a building permit was issued on or before April 13, 2009; or (2) Emergency work to protect life, limb or property; or (3) Tilling, planting, or harvesting of agricultural, horticultural, or silvicultural (forestry) crops. (Ord. No. 55 3rd series, § 1, 4-13-2009; Ord. No. 69 3rd series, § 1, 4-12-2010) SUMMARY ORDINANCE NO. , THIRD SERIES CITY OF ORONO HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ORONO MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE REGARDING THE REGULATIONS FOR LAND ALTERATIONS PERTAINING TO GRADINGS AND RUNOFF CONTROL CODE PERTAINING TO PERMITTING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that, on , 2018, Ordinance No. , Third Series, was adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that, because of the lengthy nature of Ordinance No. Third Series, the following summary of the ordinance has been prepared for publication. NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that the ordinance adopted by the Council amends Chapter 78 and 79 of the Orono City Code regarding the applicable regulations governing land alterations and grading. This ordinance amends the Orono Code by simplifying the language and reclassifying the permitted processes based on the grading activities. The complete ordinance is available for inspection by any person during the City's regular office hours. APPROVED for publication by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, this day of , 2018. CITY OF ORONO M Dennis Walsh, Mayor Anna Carlson, City Clerk Summary Ordinance published in The Laker and The Pioneer newspapers the week of 2018. To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members Dustin Rief, City Administrator From: Laura Oakden, Planner Date: 19 November 2018 Subject: #LA18-000084, City of Orono Text Amendment: Land Alterations Public Hearing Application Summary: The City is considering an ordinance that would revise the regulations for land alterations which include grading, filling and topographic alterations in all districts. Staff Recommendation: The Planning Commission should hold a public hearing and recommend approval of the proposed document. Background Applicants are often confused by the existing language and are unclear when it pertains to their project. Further, staff will discover a CUP is required during the building permit review, stalling that building permit unit a CUP is issued. Simplifying the City Code will clarify the process pertaining to land alteration permits and help streamline the permitting process. The city closely regulates grading and land alteration activities for several reasons, including: • To manage stormwater discharge, ensuring drainage does not negatively impact neighboring properties. • Manage hauling traffic and noise. • Preventing erosion issues into adjacent properties, wetlands, lakes, and road. Within these goals, staff proposes regulations that address these situations: • Mining • Land Alteration not associated with a building permit • Land Alteration of more than 50 CY in the Lake Yard (excluding rip rap), with or without a building permit • Land Alteration of more than 500 CY within the Shoreland Overlay District, excluding activity directly related to building permit. • Grading and Land alteration that serves to artificially raises the principal structure from existing grade, i.e. refine Engineered grade. • Soil export not associated with a building permit Staff also proposes to reduce or eliminate regulations that do not serve stated goals. Summary of Changes: • Allowing some common land alteration permits to be administratively reviewed to expedite projects and still ensure the proposed grading meets city standards. • No longer classifying land alterations as a Conditional Use Permit, but processing them as an Interim Use Permit, to allow a sunset date for these activities. • Edit and clarify the City Code to clarify land alteration standards and conditions FILE # LA18-000084 November 19, 2018 Page 2 of 2 • 78-1126 (3) requires a CUP for the cumulative placement of more than 1,000 cubic yards of fill when the fill is not being used to elevate the structure in accordance the Flood fringe permitted uses. Per the suggested draft ordinance, the cumulative import/export of material over 500 cubic yards of material trigger an IUP. Summary Table: Land Alteration Permit Type Code Section What changed Activity Import/export of IUP 78-1726(5) -Used to require a more than 500 CY of CUP material -Clarified the trigger is hauling on/off site Import/export of less Building Permit/ or 78-1727(l) -Clarified the trigger than 500 CY of Land Alteration 78-1727(2) is hauling on/off site material Permit Grading more than IUP 78-1726(3) -CUP 50 CY within a shore -Used be limited to setback 75', no matter the lake Grading less than 50 Building Permit/ or 78-1727(3) -Used be limited to CY within the shore Land Alteration 75', no matter the setback Permit lake Grading less than 50 No Permit Required 78-1727(3) No Change CY on a property outside of the shore setback Stockpiling more IUP 78-1726(4) -No current language than 500 CY of material Repair failed Building Permit/ or 78-1227(5) -Used to require a Shoreline Land Alteration CUP Permit Mining IUP 78-1726(l) -CUP Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Items to Consider: - Do you feel there are items or activities missing from grading/land alterations section? - Do you agree with the proposed changes highlighted in the table above? List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Draft Ordinance Exhibit B. Current City Code Exhibit C. PC Packet Item from 10.15.19 AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 30 Date: December 10, 2018 Item Description: LAI 8-000086 —Paul Vogstrom o/b/o William & Sue Dunkley & Eric Vogstrom, 2710 Pence Ln — Average Lakeshore Setback Variance Presenter: Melanie Curtis, Agenda Planning Department Planner Section: Report 1. Purpose. This application is regarding an average lakeshore setback variance for a new home to be constructed on a newly platted, conforming lot. 2. MN§15.99 Application Deadline. The application was received on October 17, 2018 and considered to be complete on October 30th. The 60 -Day review period has been extended and will expire on February 27, 2019. Background/ Summary. The City Council granted final plat approval for the Pence Lane Addition on November 26th which created the subject property. The applicant is a potential new owner for Lot 2, to be known as 2710 Pence Lane, and is requesting an average lakeshore setback variance for the new proposed home. Pence Lane Addition is a two lot subdivision which includes an outlot. The two lots created are conforming with respect to area and width, and both reflect adequate and conforming buildable footprint areas. Variances were not requested nor were any granted with the subdivision approval. The applicant is requesting an average lakeshore setback variance to encroach as much as 18 feet lakeward of the setback line. The subject property has approximately 100 feet of buildable width at the average lakeshore setback line. A pool and other non -building improvements are permitted within the average lakeshore setback up to the 75 -foot setback line. 4. Planning Commission Vote and Comment. On November 19th, the Planning Commission held a public hearing. Following the public hearing, the Planning Commission voted 4 to 2 on a motion to deny the requested variance. The members of the Commission were in agreement that, due to the lack of demonstrated practical difficulty, denial of the variance as requested would be an appropriate; however the two dissenting Commissioners indicated that they may be supportive of the portion of the proposed home within the area identified by the closest point to point measurement as shown in Exhibit E. 5. Public Comment. Comments from the neighbors were received and were included in the Planning Commission packet. 6. Staff Recommendation. Staff recommends denial of the variance because the standards for variance have not been adequately addressed. Prepared By: YY1GG Reviewed By: J. Barnhart Approved By: _Sb)X AGENDA ITEM COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED City Council should review the application and receive any public comment. The Council should make a motion directing staff to draft a resolution for adoption at the January 14' City Council meeting. Exhibits A. Proposed Survey B. Proposed Building Plans C. Draft PC Minutes D. Public Comment E. Applicant's Point to Point ALS Drawing F. 60 -day Extension G. PC Staff Report References PC Exhibits 11/19/18 A. Application B. Practical Difficulties - Applicant C. Proposed Survey/Site Plan D. Proposed Building Plans E. Proposed Hardcover F. Neighbor Comments G. PC and Council minutes — LA 18-000072 H. Map I. Property Owner List Prepared By: YY1GG Reviewed By: J. Barnhart Approved By: -Sb)X ED, w 0 9D CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR ERIC VOGSTROM OF LOT 2, BLOCK 1, PENCE LANE ADDITION HENNEPIN COUNTY MINNESOTA C) j A � \ \ S 89006'0&&'- 178.99 1 I / / I � TY EASEMENT PER PL.A /._.,......- OF CAWEN BAY HEIGHTS/ 946/ F''�G) ! i (F ` .. (o Q --948- UTILITY EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 1024262 .11 �41, / /LOT 2 PROPOSED DRIVEWAY 95 (F) I p \ GAR 951.0 � PROPOSED s� 324 HOUSE \ \ \ (A) \ \ \ AVERAGE" *\ DECK \I clip LAKESHORE (B) c \ LIN N,SETBACK II ► . a � Q \ c (C)/ (E) po S7•0'zZ4Ge --%� 5 94 oNT S�N '9Clr \ \ \ o \� I ;'SURVEY \ LINE \ II \w10,00 JL �4p \ SHORELINE OF LAKE MINNETONKA �•'� ��� `� 929.4 CONTOUR LAKE MINNETONKA 30 60 120 SCALE IN FEET /s N 88054'17" W 146.30 --' EXISTING HOUSE (FROM 6-20-91 SURVEY) _'�----'� #2715 - J DECK In O PATIO \ 0 07 AIRS & LADING r+ , S 89006'06" E 119.91 .L :( \ 091 DATE 10-16-18 __----- Val --- _ _-----_ \\\\ \\ I-------- \\\ j\NGDRi�/� 1 -30 � CIVIL ENGINEERS, LAND SURVEYORS, LAND PLANNERS DRAWN"- 10-26-18 AVG. LAKESHORE SETBACK LINE, PROP. GRADES the laws of the Stae of Minnesota. 445 N. WILLOW DRIVE LONG LAKE, MN 55356 \ --Z o � \ 0 \ •P I \\ N I � CHECKE SHEET OF I I � I DRAINAGE AND � .1_ I ••- •. UTILITY EASEMENT I / / I � TY EASEMENT PER PL.A /._.,......- OF CAWEN BAY HEIGHTS/ 946/ F''�G) ! i (F ` .. (o Q --948- UTILITY EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 1024262 .11 �41, / /LOT 2 PROPOSED DRIVEWAY 95 (F) I p \ GAR 951.0 � PROPOSED s� 324 HOUSE \ \ \ (A) \ \ \ AVERAGE" *\ DECK \I clip LAKESHORE (B) c \ LIN N,SETBACK II ► . a � Q \ c (C)/ (E) po S7•0'zZ4Ge --%� 5 94 oNT S�N '9Clr \ \ \ o \� I ;'SURVEY \ LINE \ II \w10,00 JL �4p \ SHORELINE OF LAKE MINNETONKA �•'� ��� `� 929.4 CONTOUR LAKE MINNETONKA 30 60 120 SCALE IN FEET /s N 88054'17" W 146.30 --' EXISTING HOUSE (FROM 6-20-91 SURVEY) _'�----'� #2715 - J DECK In O PATIO \ 0 07 AIRS & LADING r+ , ESIGNE :( DATE 10-16-18 G RO N B E RG &ASSOCIATES INC. *00 DATE BY REMARKS 10 _w Z U) X W I I CR 10 FA NW CORNER OF RLS NO. 310 LEGAL DESCRITION: Lot 2, Block 1, PENCE LANE ADDITION O Denotes found iron marker 0 Denotes set iron marker --W— : Denotes existing contour —R}— : Denotes proposed contour sas.5 Denotes proposed elevation This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property, a proposed house, a proposed and existing drive, and a pool. It does not purport to show any other encroachments or improvements. 18355 DRAWNG 10-26-18.scj REVISION ESIGNE ort I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision DATE 10-16-18 G RO N B E RG &ASSOCIATES INC. SCALE DATE BY REMARKS and that I am a dulyLicensed Land Surveyor under y 1 -30 � CIVIL ENGINEERS, LAND SURVEYORS, LAND PLANNERS DRAWN"- 10-26-18 AVG. LAKESHORE SETBACK LINE, PROP. GRADES the laws of the Stae of Minnesota. 445 N. WILLOW DRIVE LONG LAKE, MN 55356 188-35s 10-29-18 DATE O --f� MINN. LICENSE NUMBER /Z 7 SS' PHONE:PHONE: 952-473-4141 FAX: 952-473-4435 CHECKE SHEET OF CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR ERIC VOGSTROM OF LOT 2, BLOCK 1, PENCE LANE ADDITION HENNEPIN COUNTY MINNESOTA I / / 0101-1 0 / I \\ ass S89"0 06"t 178.99 S 89°06'06" E 119.91 .G \ pdt ------------- as \\ \ \ STING DRWF\ —____--_ — \\\ \\ \ Gi \ A \\ N I IJDRAI,NAG/EAND IIIE ANDASEMENT /¢`'//I//::. ........... 948----_--------- 0 30 60 120 SCALE IN FEET PROPOSED i \ •4 HOUSE /VERAGE' I DECK N\ LAKESHORE (B) a SETBACK LIN \� 0 r --848' UTILITY EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 1024282 V \1 LOT 2 �S r•t N 88054'17" W 146.30 PROPOSED / DRIVEWAY / '`• / O �•[ i /r v A T f ±• - '; '. • f.... r... 00 .......... \ \ :'SURVEY \ \ I LINE \\ \\ 10. SHORELINE OF -� LAKE MINNETONKA \ 929.4 CONTOUR LAKE MINNETONKA \� a N (G) 10 10 T NW CORNER OF RLS NO. 310 f't LEGAL DESCRITION: Lot 2, Block 1, PENCE LANE ADDITION p Denotes found iron marker 0 Denotes set iron marker —940— : Denotes existing contour —W : Denotes proposed contour saes : Denotes proposed elevation This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property, a proposed house, a proposed and existing drive, and a pool. It does not purport to show any other encroachments or improvements. ,esss oa4xr+c ,o-ee-,aK) RMSIONS DESIGNE I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by or under direct supervision ,D-16 -,B GRONBERG & ASSOCIATES, INC. IIIA \ \ 1 1"=30' "=3 CIVIL ENGINEERS, LAND SURVEYORS, LAND PLANNERS DRAWN III VII I I I the laws of the State of Minnesota. 1 III III II I 18-355 1 LII o4' qo \\ PHONE: 952-473-4141 FAX: 952-473-4436 HE KE sHE SHOES DATE - %•/i MINN. LICENSE NUMBER/2757 0 30 60 120 SCALE IN FEET PROPOSED i \ •4 HOUSE /VERAGE' I DECK N\ LAKESHORE (B) a SETBACK LIN \� 0 r --848' UTILITY EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 1024282 V \1 LOT 2 �S r•t N 88054'17" W 146.30 PROPOSED / DRIVEWAY / '`• / O �•[ i /r v A T f ±• - '; '. • f.... r... 00 .......... \ \ :'SURVEY \ \ I LINE \\ \\ 10. SHORELINE OF -� LAKE MINNETONKA \ 929.4 CONTOUR LAKE MINNETONKA \� a N (G) 10 10 T NW CORNER OF RLS NO. 310 f't LEGAL DESCRITION: Lot 2, Block 1, PENCE LANE ADDITION p Denotes found iron marker 0 Denotes set iron marker —940— : Denotes existing contour —W : Denotes proposed contour saes : Denotes proposed elevation This survey intends to show the boundaries of the above described property, a proposed house, a proposed and existing drive, and a pool. It does not purport to show any other encroachments or improvements. ,esss oa4xr+c ,o-ee-,aK) RMSIONS DESIGNE I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by or under direct supervision ,D-16 -,B GRONBERG & ASSOCIATES, INC. DATE BY REMARKS La and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under duly 1"=30' "=3 CIVIL ENGINEERS, LAND SURVEYORS, LAND PLANNERS DRAWN lo-zs-,e 4vc. w¢sHou sE m LM Psor. cm s the laws of the State of Minnesota. 18-355 445 N. WILLOW DRIVE LONG LAKE, MN 55356 0.19_„ PHONE: 952-473-4141 FAX: 952-473-4436 HE KE sHE SHOES DATE - %•/i MINN. LICENSE NUMBER/2757 C oft ftm ��� .,gTION 1/411 = 1 '-0" L G 0 FM U) Z 0 20 a% i 0Z U p W 0 O o i g LnO N a N m r� (D �O G %amloo o C L 1/411 /4„ = 1'-011 r O �Z m O > V Z O W O 0 V N O a F- 0 E +) 1 � L a N m � z �c~n %wamo w 0 f h\ 5� L .o �0 6-1 76-11 MAIN FLOOR PLAN 2148 SQ FT 1/411 = 1 '-0" L G 0 Fm U) Z (D 20 a% i 0Z U p W 0 O o i g LnO N a N m r� (D �O G %amloo o MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, November 19, 2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. 2. LA18-000086 PAUL VOGSTROM, 2710 PENCE LANE, VARIANCE, 6:32 P.M. — 7:30 P.M. Paul Vogstrom, Applicant, was present. Curtis stated this application is regarding a lot to be created pending a final plat. This lot has an approximate 100 -foot wide building envelope without encroaching into the average lakeshore variance. The proposed house encroaches approximately 18 to 19 feet into the average lakeshore setback. Staff reviewed the practical difficulty analysis submitted by the applicant and found it lacking. Average lakeshore setback variances may be granted when the request is in keeping with the spirit and intent of the zoning chapter. The burden for demonstrating a practical difficulty is on the applicant. Based on the justification provided, Staff finds there are no valid practical difficulties supporting granting of the variance. It appears that the uniqueness of the lot is created by the pending plat and the requested encroachment is largely a convenience factor. Approving a variance without justification establishes a precarious precedent where variances are concerned. Public comments have been included in the Planning Commission's packet. Staff recommends denial of the variance. Paul Vogstrom, Applicant, stated at the last meeting they had a different line of sight arrangement that was depicted on the plat map. Vogstrom indicated he has spoken with the neighbors regarding their proposal, re-examined the plat, and then moved around the proposed house on the lot because in looking at it, he redesigned it to what makes sense. Vogstrom stated in his view the proposal meets the spirit of the rules. Mark Gronberg, Surveyor, stated he came into the project about halfway through and that there was some information from a previous surveyor that had the average sightline depicted in green, which has since been pushed further back based on comments from Staff. The original house that was on the lot is depicted in red and was 76 feet back from the lake. The original proposal is depicted in blue, which is located behind that. Further on into the process Staff said that the setback should be measured from the closest point to the lake on the two adjoining lots. Gronberg indicated he was a little surprised by that since in his 44 years of working in the City he has never seen it measured that way. In other cities it is usually the sightline distance between the closest corners. Gronberg noted in March, when he was working on the Judd Dayton application, the average lakeshore setback was prepared by City Staff showing the line going from the closest point to the lake from the adjoining corners. Gronberg stated he knows there has been some discrepancy in the past as to how the ordinance has been interpreted, and when this average lakeshore setback line kept getting pushed back, they Vogstroms felt they needed to request a variance. Curtis noted this is a Staff approximation of the average lakeshore setback since it was not depicted on a formal survey. Curtis stated if they drew the line from the closest point to the lake, the line would likely vary by 20 to 30 feet. Gronberg stated the ordinances are great when there is a straight shoreline, but when the shoreline is not straight, that causes some problems. Gronberg noted the sightline for the proposed house is behind the MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, November 19, 2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. two existing houses and does not appear to meet the intent of the ordinance. The Dunkley house is approximately 25 feet from the lake and the other house is approximately 80 feet from the lake, which is quite a difference. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 6:39 p.m. Kelly Hueler, 2715 Pence Lane, stated she is not sure what the comments were relative to talking to the neighbors since they were not spoken to about this drawing even though they live next door. Hueler stated it was their understanding that the lot that was permitted or approved was to be a conforming subdivision and that there were to be no requests for variances. The Dunkley home was granted three variances and there were clearly some legitimate reasons for practical difficulties. However, relative to where the original house was positioned previously, that house was completely torn down and the foundation removed. If the applicants had wanted to keep the previous foundation and work from that, that was an option available to any potential developer or prospective buyer. The applicants chose not to do that and the foundation has been removed. Hueler stated it is their understanding that the lines that were drawn is the way the setbacks have been measured and that the lot was to be conforming, which means there would be no reason to grant a variance. Greg Hueler stated the lot someone purchases is the buyer's choice, and if the desired house does not fit on the lot, they should look at buying a different lot. Kelly Hueler noted they did not object to the Dunkleys' variance requests primarily because it was an existing residence and they had practical difficulties that were legitimate. There is absolutely no reason for this lot to be granted any variances since it should be a conforming lot and there is a sufficient building envelope available behind the average lakeshore setback line. Greg Hueler noted they also did not oppose the subdivision because it was conforming. Kelly Hueler commented the rules should apply equally to everyone and that they should be able to rely on that Hueler noted they also have concerns about the proposal as it relates to the potential for runoff and that there is a drainage system between the two houses. Hueler stated she is not exactly sure who is in control of what but that there is a tremendous amount of water that needs to be dealt with and addressed when the lot is finalized or when a building permit is applied for. Paul Vogstrom stated he did work with the Huelers in the past and that they all met on the property prior to designing the lot. Vogstrom noted they have the right to be able to subdivide the property and have a cul-de-sac, which is something the Huelers opposed. That request was respected and the proposal does not include a cul-de-sac. Vogstrom indicated he walked the site with the Huelers and identified where they should locate the new house at the time when the original house existed on the property. Vogstrom stated he suggested moving the house back slightly to improve the Huelers' line of sight and that he lined it up with their property so it would work for everybody. Following that meeting, they then went through the process of a sketch plan and a formal application. The Huelers were worried about the driveway and so changes were made to that. Vogstrom indicated they went through a lot more work in an attempt to satisfy the Huelers and that they could have done it a different way which would have made it a lot easier. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, November 19, 2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. Vogstrom stated they tore the house down because they felt they were doing the right thing by helping to save the Huelers' view. In addition, a willow tree was removed and the house was pushed back. If the house is placed further back on the lot, it will block the Huelers' view from their front yard, and by pushing the house forward, that helps protect some of the sightlines. Vogstrom stated he tried to reach an agreement on the outlot and that he created a lot of different designs for the Huelers. Vogstrom commented he is upset because the Huelers are not telling the full story and that they have tried to work with everybody in the City. Vogstrom stated the variance makes sense and works for the neighbors. Eric Vogstrom, 2710 Pence, stated when they appeared here previously, the average Lakeshore setback line was in a different location. Curtis stated the previous surveyor did not have it correct. Curtis pointed out where the line of sight was depicted originally and noted that the additional piece or bump -out was added to the house. Eric Vogstrom stated the Planning Commission recommended that they soften the impact and show some flexibility. Mr. Hueler wanted to keep his side view and they also had a willow tree that they took down. Vogstrom stated they listened to the feedback, which is why it was designed this way and that the window that is blocked is the view from the master bedroom closest. Curtis stated she did not move the setback line but clarified it at the City Council meeting because it was located incorrectly by a previous surveyor. Eric Vogstrom stated at the last two meetings the setback was shown in a different location and the only time it moved to the present spot was when they went to the City Council. Vogstrom stated they attempted to work with the City and listen to the Huelers. At the sketch plan meeting Mr. Thiesse pointed out that this is a peninsula and there is not much they can do about the average line of sight. Thiesse stated to his knowledge he was corrected on that later in the meeting. Eric Vogstrom stated the spirit of the rule is for everyone to basically be the same. Vogstrom noted he is now 120 feet at the closest part and 130 feet at the two furthest points, which is not the spirit of the rule. Because the lot meanders, Vogstrom stated in his view there is a practical difficulty. Vogstrom stated at the sketch plan meeting, everyone was on board, but then after that everything changed because the Dunkleys could not reach an agreement with the Huelers to purchase the property. Vogstrom stated they did not realize the repercussions of combining the lot or they would not have done that. Vogstrom stated in his view they have honored what Mr. Hueler requested by maintaining his side view, which he did not originally have, and that they have shown a lot of flexibility and have followed the direction of the City. Greg Hueler pointed out he last talked to Paul Vogstrom a year and a half ago and that they have not had any discussion about this proposal. Kelly Hueler noted they are not opposing the conforming lot as it was approved by the City Council and that they all want to be treated fairly. Hueler stated their home is an existing home, and if they decide to renovate, they may also have some practical difficulties similar to the Dunkleys. But because this is a MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, November 19, 2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. brand new lot, it is required to be conforming and that there is a buildable pad. Hueler stated anything they do or say that is outside the code has anything to do with anything. Hueler noted the window that was mentioned is not the master closet but is their master bedroom. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 6:55 p.m. Ressler stated it is his understanding that the proposed structure has not changed but what has changed is what was understood to be the average lakeshore setback line. Curtis noted the house has a different orientation and footprint and the bump -out is new. Curtis stated the average lakeshore setback line was depicted on the plat but the house was not discussed and was not in the location it is now. At that time the Vogstroms were proposing a conforming plat, which is what the Planning Commission approved. Vogstrom stated the Planning Commission recommendation was based on an incorrect plat. Curtis stated at the last meeting where this plan was reviewed, the proposed house was not in the location that is now being proposed and that the Planning Commission only recommended approval of the lot. Eric Vogstrom noted the average lakeshore setback line was in a different spot and that they relocated the house to help protect the Huelers' view. Paul Vogstrom commented they have been through a lot with this application and that they have always wanted to make it right. Vogstrom indicated he worked with the neighbors and talked with them many, many times and that he fought very hard for them not to have that cul-de-sac. Vogstrom stated they could have kept this very simple, but they were trying to accommodate the Huelers. As a result, they combined the lot and moved the house back. Vogstrom stated their proposal does not obstruct the Huelers' view from their front yard or from their master bedroom and that he is hoping to do what is right. Vogstrom asked what the spirit is of an average lakeshore setback variance and why is it in place. Thiesse stated it is in place to protect the neighbors' view shed and that the proposed house is ahead of the line that has been described as the view shed. Vogstrom asked which view is being protected. Thiesse stated the City has decided on a line and the proposed house is in front of it. Libby noted there is an envelope to build a house. Libby asked whether there is some type of architectural or design deficiency of building within the envelope. Vogstrom stated it is the odd shape of the lot and that it bottlenecks up between the two properties. Vogstrom indicated they are trying to avoid doing a detached garage so they do not have another structure in the hopes that would make the Huelers happy. Vogstrom stated the line of sight should be looked at from all sides of the home and that the average setback line has been depicted wrong and interpreted MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, November 19, 2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. differently. Vogstrom stated in his view this average lakeshore setback is protecting all sides and that he respected their view with this design. Eric Vogstrom stated when they came back on June 18, that is when they thought the line of sight was established. When they came back again on September 17, the setback line was still there. On October 8 at the City Council meeting, that is the first time they found out the line got screwed up. Vogstrom stated the old line was there from June until October, and then right before the Council meeting, it got moved back an extra seven feet. Vogstrom stated in their view the curved lot creates a practical difficulty. Libby asked if Mr. Gronberg was referring to the meander of the lakeshore and how it is not always a consistent straight line. Gronberg stated it is not a straight line and that it juts out on this lot and goes way back on the Dunkley lot. Landgraver asked whether the shape of the shoreline has anything to do with the average lakeshore setback line. Curtis stated it does not and that the Dunkley home that the western point is measured from is nonconforming. The code reads: The average lakeshore setback line shall be a straight line connecting the most lakeward protrusions of the residents' buildings on the immediately adjacent lakeshore lots, which is what the code reads today and has read in the past. Thiesse asked if that is what the line indicates. Curtis stated it does. Curtis indicated she spoke with Mr. Gronberg about Staff s reading of the average lakeshore setback determination. Staff interprets it to be the most lakeward protrusion of each of the adjacent homes. Mr. Gronberg has correctly depicted it at the 23 -foot mark. Libby asked whether there have been instances in the past or whether there could be instances where the meandering lakeshore could cause a practical difficulty. Curtis stated it does and the Council and Planning Commissions in the past have weighed all of the factors in each particular situation. In situations where a variance was granted to the average lakeshore setback, in almost all of those situations the neighbors were supportive of the encroachment. Landgraver stated he knows this has been a long process and that he does not want to get into what the prior stuff was since the Planning Commission needs to make the decision upon the right measurements. Landgraver noted the plan does show a variance to what was sketched before but that he is not seeing a lot of practical difficulty for this design and that he is not in favor of granting the variance. Ressler stated he struggles with it because he initially thought the line was where it was depicted previously and that everyone seemed to be comfortable with it. Adding the bump -out makes it more difficult because it was not part of the original plan and going back to what was understood as the average lakeshore setback is becoming a little bit irrelevant. Ressler indicated he was prepared to be in support of the application if the structure was in compliance with the previous line but that the bump -out changes that. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, November 19, 2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. Ressler noted Orono has a lot of lakeshore and that maybe the City should take a harder look at how it recognizes the average lakeshore setback. Ressler stated he would like to see that bump -out eliminated or improved in some way and that he does not support it as is. Libby asked what the nature is of the modified bump -out and what purpose it serves. Paul Vogstrom indicated it is a one-story bump -out and serves as a sunroom area to maximize the views, maximizes the property, and still respects the views of the neighboring property. Libby asked if physical movement of the entire structure would deprive them of this panoramic view. Vogstrom indicated he would not be able to have an attached garage up front and that they would need to do an L-shaped garage. Libby commented it appears there is plenty of room at the rear. Vogstrom stated all it is doing is creating a bottleneck and gives the appearance of an alley. It would also block the Huelers' front view from the north side of the house and they will be looking at a garage, which is something they have been opposed to seeing before. Vogstrom stated in his view it needs to be looked at from what is right and what fits with the lot and that they are protecting the line of sight. Thiesse noted the Planning Commission is responsible for enforcing the average lakeshore setback line. Vogstrom stated that is the reason behind a variance and that this is a perfect spot for a variance. Libby indicated he would be in favor of a variance. Olson stated he struggles with it if it is approved because of what kind of precedent will be set. The Planning Commission is supposed to uphold the setback lines, and as it stands right now, the house encroaches more than what he can be comfortable with. Erickson stated given the shape of the shoreline and the way it meanders and turns, that could be the basis for a practical difficulty. Orono has a lot of shoreline that is straighter than this and not too many that are curved like this. Erickson stated the parts that concern him have more to do with the procedure and the City's previous history with this property. The first proposal had multiple cul-de-sacs and multiple gates and multiple issues. The applicants then came back with a revised plan and the proposal was enormously improved, which the applicants deserve credit for. All the objections were removed, including any need for variances. Erickson stated he asked at that time specifically about whether this shape creates a situation where they are going to come back and ask for more variances and he was assured that wouldn't happen. The Planning Commission was further assured by the drawing at that time that showed the house right up against the line and not crossing it. Erickson noted that plan has yet to be finally approved by the City Council but the applicants are now asking for a variance. Erickson commented he has seen this type of hearing happen in many cities and the thing that consistently drives cities crazy is somebody gets approved for a certain plan and then one day it gets built and it is different. Erickson stated maybe the MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, November 19, 2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. fact that the applicants are bringing in this change before the other part is approved prevents the City from getting surprised. Erickson stated he also has a little concern about the previous drawing showing the setback line in a somewhat different place and that in his view it is reasonable for the applicants to go by that line and not another line that is further back. Erickson stated it looks like there is not only that change but the applicants have also decided to redesign the house to intrude even more, which is somewhat problematic. Landgraver asked if the preliminary plat was approved by the City Council. Curtis indicated it has been and the final plat is on the November 26 agenda. Landgraver noted they did not discuss the average lakeshore setback previously because the Planning Commission was attempting to get a lot without the need for any variances. At that time the average lakeshore setback line did not seem to be the main consideration and the applicants did the right thing by bringing in Mark Gronberg. Landgraver stated regardless of that, he does not feel the Planning Commission is bound to stick with the previous average lakeshore setback. Thiesse stated there was a house footprint that was shown on the plan previously that was compliant with the old line. Eric Vogstrom stated if the line had not been moved, they would not have come back requesting a variance. Vogstrom stated they did not know it was incorrect and that they assumed it was correct. Vogstrom commented they are not trying to pull a fast one and that he hopes the City can compromise and say that this plan makes more sense. Curtis stated if that was the true logic for this design, then the house would look like the original plan without the 15 -foot bump -out. Eric Vogstrom stated they created the bump -out because they hit the reset button. When they had the original setback line, he was fine with it, but then if he is going to go in for a variance, they want to get something that would make a little more sense. Vogstrom indicated they have been up here compromising and compromising but they have not seen anyone else compromise. Vogstrom stated in his view it is absolutely a practical difficulty given the curvature of the line. Libby asked if they returned to the original setback whether they would have the same discussion regarding encroachment of the structure. Curtis stated the only time the applicants have shown a conforming house location has been on the preliminary plat drawing but that unfortunately the average lakeshore setback line was not correct. Staff caught it when the plans were moving forward to the City Council. Thiesse noted the average lakeshore setback and the shoreline on the property are pretty much parallel and that the applicants are gaining the extra view to the west because the line goes up. Thiesse stated in his view he does not feel the applicants are losing anything. Thiesse noted this lot is a blank piece of paper and that a conforming house can be built on the lot. Landgraver moved, Olson seconded, to recommend denial of Application No. LAI 8-000086, Paul Vogstrom, 2710 Pence Lane, granting of a variance to the average lakeshore setback. MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday, November 19, 2018 6:30 o'clock p.m. Erickson stated he would feel better about supporting the motion if the line presented at a previous meeting was still the line and that he would support a variance given the methodology that was used. Erickson stated he can see how the applicant was led to believe that that would be a workable solution and that he has a problem voting for denial at this point because he also recognizes that the applicants have put in a lot of effort into the application. Erickson stated what they are showing now is not hugely different from what was previously proposed. Thiesse stated moving the house further back is not that different either. Ressler noted the bump -out is a 15 -foot difference. Thiesse stated it is his understanding Mr. Erickson was saying that he would not allow the bump -out but that he would allow the house at the previous line. Ressler stated he would also entertain approving the previous setback line since he feels there was agreement on the previous placement. Thiesse noted the setback line is incorrect and that he cannot support the variance. Landgraver stated the line is what it is as opposed to whatever the prior survey said. Landgraver stated he disagrees with the analysis and giving the applicants a pass. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 2, Ressler and Erickson Opposed. November 12, 2018 Melanie Curtis City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Dear Ms. Curtis: We received notice from the city of a variance request for Paul Vogstrom at 2710 Pence Lane for an average setback variance to permit construction of a new residence approximately + or -18 feet lakeward of the ALS line. We are unable to attend the meeting and want to go on record as opposing this variance. We live next door to Bill and Sue Dunkley so we are very familiar with the project and construction that has been ongoing for more than a year. There is already a large concentration of hardcover within the 75 foot setback on the existing Dunkley property. It is our understanding that variances are sometimes granted to alleviate a hardship due to an existing condition. This lot was recently created for the intent of building a new home and therefore, there should be no existing hardship. Furthermore, when permission was granted to split off this lot from the existing Dunkley property, it was stated that there would be no future requests for variances. Sincerely Bill and Sandra Keegan 2707 Walters Port Lane Orono, MN 55331 From: Jeremy Barnhart To: Melanie Curtis Subject: FW: 2710 PENCE LANE Date: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 4:40:07 PM FYI Jeremy Barnhart, AICP Community Development Director Direct 952.249.4626 Planning & Zoning Office 952.249.4620 2750 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 Website: www.ci.orono.mn.us From: Aaron H. Printup Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 3:37 PM To: Jeremy Barnhart <jbarnhart@ci.orono.mn.us> Cc: Dustin Rief <drief@ci.orono.mn.us> Subject: FW: 2710 PENCE LANE From: Debbie Getlin Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2018 1:17 PM To: Aaron H. Printup Subject: 2710 PENCE LANE My husband, Larry, and I will be out of town and unable to attend the upcoming Orono Planning Commission Public Hearing on Monday 11/19. However, we would both like our opinion to be recorded regarding: LA 18000086 Paul Vogstrom, 2710 Pence Lane, requesting a lakeshore setback variance to permit construction of a new residence approximately 18 feet lakeward of the ALS line. Our concern is this variance sets a precedent. This will not be a 1 -time deal. Once permission is given for this variance, it will become the benchmark for future requests and eventually have a great negative impact on this beautiful lake. The commission needs to protect the future of this lake, and we do NOT believe this variance should be granted. Thank you for your consideration. Debbie & Larry Getlin 2690 Pheasant Rd Orono, MN 55331 612-386-9063 November 15, 2018 The Honorable Mayor Dennis Walsh and Planning Commission Members City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, Minnesota 55423 Re: Opposition to Proposed Variances for William and Susan Dunkley for Property at 2709 Walters Port Lane (and new lot that is in the process of being subdivided) Dear Mayor Walsh and Planning Commission Members: This letter is in opposition to the above matter. As you know, we reside immediately adjacent to the Dunkley property and have testified on a number of occasions regarding our concerns about the development proposed by the Dunkleys. We did not oppose the conforming subdivision of the Dunkley's property into a "conforming lot". This lot has dimensions that allow a beautiful home to be built within the City Code and set back requirements. Our understanding, as set forth in William Griffith's letter from July to the City Council is "that a lawful variance requires a showing of unique circumstances not created by the landowner. See Minn. Stat. § 462.357, subd. 6(2) (holding that "practical difficulties" requires the landowner to show "the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property[.]"); see also Continental Prop. Grp. V. City of Wayzata, No. A15-1550,2016 WL 1551693, at #1 (rejecting developer's uniqueness argument where other properties were subject to the same zoning ordinances). See Also Mohler, 645 N.W.2d at 632 (holding variance was not justified where there was no "unique condition under the statute."); cf. Minn Stat. § 394.22, subd. 10 (requiring, in context of county variance, that there be "exceptional circumstances" for a variance to issue). As you are well aware, the Dunkleys have made a number of decisions, including the positioning of the proposed lots, the combination of existing parcels, and construction of a massive addition to their home, all of which preclude the proposed subdivision and house pad. Consequently, they have failed to demonstrate unique circumstances which justify the grant of a variance." The Dunkleys own the property. It has not legally been subdivided yet. They are requesting variances for a lot they plan to sell in the future. The new potential owner is now making the request for variances. Everyone, including the new potential owner, were informed that the subdivision needed to have no variances, and were granted this subdivision by the City Council based on this understanding. They are now asking for a variance to build outside the boundaries The Honorable Mayor Dennis Walsh and Planning Commission Members November 15, 2018 Page 2 that were required for the subdivision to be granted. There are no practical difficulties and we oppose any variances being granted for this project. The subdivision project needs to remain conforming as was required when approval was granted. We appreciate your careful attention to this matter. Thank you. Sincerely, Greg and Kelli Hueler 4853-3083-2493, v. 1 Larkin Hoffipan ATTORNEYS est. 195$ July 20, 2018 The Honorable Mayor Dennis Walsh and City Council Members City of Orono 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, Minnesota 55423 Larkin Hoffman 8300 Norman Center Drive Suite 1000 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55437-1060 crNeanu: 952-835-3800 FAX: 952-896-3333 WEB: wwwlukinhoffman.com Re: Opposition to Sketch Plan and Proposed Variances for William and Susan Dunkley for Property at 2709 Walters Port Lane Dear Mayor Walsh and City Council Members: This letter is written on behalf of Greg and Kelli Hueler in opposition to the above matter. As you know, the Huelers are immediately adjacent to the Dunkley property and have testified on a number of occasions regarding their significant concerns about the development proposed by the Dunkleys. This letter is written to set forth their objections to the current sketch plan, as well as the illegal expansion of use of the private driveway. Discussion As noted in the City staff report, the Dunkleys were unsuccessful in obtaining a lot line rearrangement which required a number of variances and was not supported by the Planning Commission or City Council. This application, submitted last year, was withdrawn by the Dunkleys who then pursued the combination of the two parcels into one property record at Hennepin County so they could expedite permitting of a massive addition to their existing home. Still, the addition required variances to the average lakeshore setback, the 75 -foot setback and hard cover limitations. Now, a year later, the Dunkleys are again pursuing a plan that is similar to the plan that was not supported by the Planning Commission or City Council in 2017. There is no legal basis for a variance to create the new lot with a nonconforming house pad because the actions of the applicant created the need for the variance. As a matter of law, a practical difficulty or hardship cannot be created by the actions of the applicant. Legal Analysis A lawful variance requires a showing of unique circumstances not created by the landowner. See Minn. Stat. § 462.357, subd. 6(2) (holding that "practical difficulties" requires the landowner to show "the plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property[.]"); see also Continental Prop. Grp. V. City of Wayzata, No. A15-1550, 2016 WL 1551693, at #1 (rejecting The Honorable Mayor Dennis Walsh and City Council Members July 20, 2018 Paae 2 developer's uniqueness argument where other properties were subject to the same zoning ordinances). See Also Mohler, 645 N.W.2d at 632 (holding variance was not justified where there was no "unique condition under the statute."); cf. Minn Stat. § 394.22, subd. 10 (requiring, in context of county variance, that there be "exceptional circumstances" for a variance to issue). In this case, the Dunkleys have made a number of decisions, including the positioning of the proposed lots, the combination of existing parcels, and construction of a massive addition to their home, all of which preclude the proposed subdivision and house pad. Consequently, they have failed to demonstrate unique circumstances which justify the grant of a variance. Conclusion In conclusion, the request by the Dunkleys cannot be supported by existing law or the required findings for a variance under the City Code. In 2017, the Dunkleys decided to withdraw their previous application because it was not supported by the Planning Commission or City Council. They used the lot combination process through Hennepin County to circumvent the subdivision requirements so that they could expedite the construction of a massive addition to their home. In doing so, the applicants made an election between expanding their home and creating a second lot with a conforming building pad. Once this election was made, they foreclosed the legal basis for obtaining variances for the proposed lot and building pad. The Dunkleys cannot meet the legal burden for obtaining variances for the proposed subdivision and should be advised accordingly. We appreciate your careful attention to this matter. Thank you. Sincerely, William C. Griffith, for Larkin Hoffinan Direct Dial: 952-896-3290 Direct Fax: 952-842-1729 Email: w rig_ffithglarkinhoffman.com cc: Greg and Kelli Hueler Soren Mattick, City Attorney Melanie Curtis, City Planner The Honorable Mayor Dennis Walsh and City Council Members July 20, 2018 4853-3083-2493, v. 1 18-355 U- 0 LU i-.... ..�... I z M i---- ..... i i•• i-- I O O • •----. - ... - - • ''� I z zw S 00°34'25" W 414.33 j °295 // ° // / / ,Z \\ \ \ 1 Z / / / z \\ \ \ t -- / (n\ N wQ v w \\ \\ \\ I Q C-0, z� \ \ I—:\ 1 w 1 Z \\\ \ w = \ \! 1 o W w \\ 1 (o o I I � ` i - I I I I � l i I li � ! 00 ...`: .+ w•y-• i - 98'9V4 - _o -- -- I \� I I I I I I I I I 1 I � i I1 I� I , I 15 I i 1 M I C.6 d- i r - N 1 I � 1 U') ....... 0 0 1 � .,. . / I Ilk Y I 15 -•J 00 00L S0O61 *7 -f -+ OM ------------------- J I ... ....Ot'.50° L0 S f-,'--- �W '.0 / ........ �.�. cn / /9 l / / �l o Ow // ^Q� 0$� ;may �0 ¢4 a Z /a om QOM pOIz vo C,� �•../ / ' / //// w? DO / / - OZ >w / / 2 / �V >z w0Y / o / O,`� Lu z 9 .. ///,� / ////� Z Y. Z \ / — 6 �/ //// � z Of LLJ 06617 OL 10, t��0��0 X-5111 // � v cc Amo LO to Z LU CV) dM' >�° Z in O� E Z o Cl) J Z ti X =.U) a �a)c 0CNI CN Z Z L-oai Q W F LA O Amo F_ �0E p oocv J p 0 'QL3 Q L 0, 4) a o 0 0 (' LL QW Y - U) i- Z 7 OOO' 300 W E -6Z2 � _"� > O w oEo- o=0 =J Z U crn4 -0L O z 00.�o (a 0) Q to w r' H w =3 -- '0 c0� C � 'R ��0ia �0� � Z � � C) a) U) U) (1)a (L) J G M W 00 0 0 0 N O O C U jE Qo 2 o N J o* �, I- aaE W Z J LO M Z w -Z O�LZ O w z Y `, N r 9 w LO r w we �M , w o� C 11 G=o 3nIJNIlSiX3 C) //00°34'2 'Il ° °`'° °295 // ° // / / ,Z \\ \ \ 1 Z / / / z \\ \ \ t -- / (n\ N wQ v w \\ \\ \\ I Q C-0, z� \ \ I—:\ 1 w 1 Z \\\ \ w = \ \! 1 o W w \\ 1 (o o I I � ` i - I I I I � l i I li � ! 00 ...`: .+ w•y-• i - 98'9V4 - _o -- -- I \� I I I I I I I I I 1 I � i I1 I� I , I 15 I i 1 M I C.6 d- i r - N 1 I � 1 U') ....... 0 0 1 � .,. . / I Ilk Y I 15 -•J 00 00L S0O61 *7 -f -+ OM ------------------- J I ... ....Ot'.50° L0 S f-,'--- �W '.0 / ........ �.�. cn / /9 l / / �l o Ow // ^Q� 0$� ;may �0 ¢4 a Z /a om QOM pOIz vo C,� �•../ / ' / //// w? DO / / - OZ >w / / 2 / �V >z w0Y / o / O,`� Lu z 9 .. ///,� / ////� Z Y. Z \ / — 6 �/ //// � z Of LLJ 06617 OL 10, t��0��0 X-5111 // � v cc Amo LO to Z LU CV) dM' >�° Z in O� E Z o Cl) J Z ti X =.U) a �a)c 0CNI CN Z Z L-oai Q W F LA O Amo F_ �0E p oocv J p 0 'QL3 Q L 0, 4) a o 0 0 (' LL QW Y - U) i- Z 7 OOO' 300 W E -6Z2 � _"� > O w oEo- o=0 =J Z U crn4 -0L O z 00.�o (a 0) Q to w r' H w =3 -- '0 c0� C � 'R ��0ia �0� � Z � � C) a) U) U) (1)a (L) J G M W 00 0 0 0 N O O C U jE Qo 2 o N J o* �, I- aaE W Z J LO M Z w -Z O�LZ O w z Y `, N r 9 04) oy. � U � U 4) to sa-, N >1cc O -E -j 0 C N O 0 N c CL 4� DOJO mE5B Saco c� 0 oE:S UL N t6 O A"��L 2 0- cc .r CU c o _3cc� w LO r w we �M zLO Cf) w o� C 11 M Focn C) ° °`'° LL z u 04) oy. � U � U 4) to sa-, N >1cc O -E -j 0 C N O 0 N c CL 4� DOJO mE5B Saco c� 0 oE:S UL N t6 O A"��L 2 0- cc .r CU c o _3cc� m Y It W it LU p LU m 2 D z LU co z LU U J z z 2 w z U) oU LU M W W LL z u m Y It W it LU p LU m 2 D z LU co z LU U J z z 2 w J Q oU M m Y It W it LU p LU m 2 D z LU co z LU U J z z 2 %©)VO CITY OF ORONO Street Address.. Mailing Address: Telephone (952) 249-4600 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Fax (952) 249-4616 l C Orono, WAN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 www.ci.orono.mn.us \ESHOk° 27 November 2018 Paul Vogstrom Sent via Email: paulvogstrom@aol.com 10231 Beebe Lake Road Hanover, MN 55341 SUBJECT: 60 -Day Extension / Application Review Timing Zoning Application #LA18-000086 On October 17, 2018, the City of Orono received your application for a variance for property to be addressed 2710 Pence Lane; the application was considered to be complete on October 30th. The 60 - day review timing would expire on December 29th Your application is scheduled to be on the City Council's December 10th agenda for their initial review. The Council only meets one Monday in December and a second meeting is necessary for resolution adoption. Therefore, the City hereby notifies you that it is extending the time period for City action under Minn. Stat. § 15.99, subd. 3(f). This is a routine extension. The review time period is now hereby extended until February 27, 2019. Anticipate that your application will be before the City Council at their first meeting of 2019 — Monday, January 14th for final action. Please contact me with any questions at 952.249.4627 or mcurtis@ci.orono.mn.us. Sincerely, CITY OF ORONO Melanie Curtis Planner Email copies: Sue Dunkley Eric Vogstrom Date Application Received: 10/17/2018 Date Application Considered as Complete: 10/30/18 60 -Day Review Period Expires: 12/29/18 To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members Dustin Rief, City Administrator From: Melanie Curtis, Planner h'1GG Date: 19 November 2018 Subject: #LA18-000086, Paul Vogstrom o/b/o William & Sue Dunkley & Eric Vogstrom, 2710 Pence Lane — Lot 2 Pence Lane Addition (Pending) Average Lakeshore Setback Variance — Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting an average lakeshore setback variance for a new single family home. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends denial. Summary In October, the City Council approved a preliminary plat (File No. LA18-000072); Final Plat approval should be forthcoming at the City Council's November 26th meeting. The new owner of Lot 2 Pence Lane Addition (2710 Pence Lane) is now requesting an average Lakeshore setback variance for the new home and a deck. With the plat approval, the property owner and the applicant both stated that no variances for Lot 2 would be requested. Minutes are attached as Exhibit G. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-330 & 78-1279 - Setbacks: LR -113 Required Proposed Rear 35' +400' West Side 10' 10.1' East Side 10' 10.5' Lakeshore 75' 120' Average Lakeshore The proposed home and deck encroach as much as 18.8' feet lakeward of the average lakeshore setback line. Section 78- 330 - Lot Area/Width: LR -113 Lot Area Lot Width Required 43,560 s.f. (1.0 acres) 140' Actual 64,359 s.f. (1.47 acre) ±160' @ 75'/ ±150' @ OHWL FILE # LA18-000086 19 Nov 2018 Page 2 of 4 Section 78-1403- Structural Cove Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 64,359 s.f. (1.47 acre) Allowed: 12,871 s.f. (20%) Proposed: 2,978 s.f. (4.6%) Section 78-1680 and 78-1700 -Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Total Area in Overlay District Allowed Hardcover Proposed Hardcover Tier Zone Tier 1 64,359 s.f. 16,089 s.f. 13,593 s.f. 0 s.f. w/in 75'* ( o) 25 (21�) *No lake access is currently proposed. The lake access hardcover will be added into the total and also the 0-75' zone. Hardcover may not exceed 25%. Applicable Regulations: Averaize Lakeshore Setback Variance (Section 78-1279 Based on the newly approved configuration of Lot 2, there is an approximate 100 -foot wide buildable envelope at the average lakeshore setback line. There is a generally flat house pad area to support a home, without encroaching into the side yard setbacks, the lake yard, or the average lakeshore setback. The applicant's plan results in an approximate 18.8' encroachment lakeward of the average lakeshore setback line with house and an above -grade deck. Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. Practical Difficulties Statement The applicant provided a practical difficulty analysis. That analysis is attached as Exhibit B and has been incorporated into the 12 criteria below. The applicant should be asked for additional testimony regarding the variance request. According to MN §462.537 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. FILE # LA18-000086 19 Nov 2018 Page 3 of 4 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; Applicant Response: yes There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; Applicant Response: unique property shape; and The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. Applicant Response: no Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Applicant Response: lot shape and 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth -sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78. Applicant Response:n/a 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. Applicant Response: ok 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. Applicant Response: n/a 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. Applicant Response: yes 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located. Applicant Response: unique shaped lot 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Applicant Response: yes 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Applicant Response: no 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Applicant Response: plan design fits unique shaped lot and adjacent properties The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Practical Difficulties Analysis The Council may grant variances only when it is demonstrated that such action is in keeping with the spirit and intent of the chapter. The burden for demonstrating the need or justification for a variance is on the applicant. Based on the justification provided, Staff finds that there are little to no valid practical difficulties supporting granting of the variance. It appears that the uniqueness of the lot is created by the pending plat, and the requested encroachment is largely a convenience factor. Approving a variance with obvious deficiencies in its justification establishes a precarious precedent where variances are concerned. FILE # LA18-000086 19 Nov 2018 Page 4 of 4 Public Comment Comments from the public have been received and are attached as Exhibit F. Staff Recommendation Planning staff recommends denial of the variance. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties -Applicant Exhibit C. Proposed Survey/Site Plan Exhibit D. Proposed Building Plans Exhibit E. Proposed Hardcover Exhibit F. Neighbor Comments Exhibit G. PC and Council minutes — LA18-000072 Exhibit H. Map Exhibit I. Property Owner List AGENDA ITEM Item No.: 31 Item Description: Closed Session Date: December 10, 2018 Presenter: Soren Mattick, Agenda City Attorney Report City Attorney Section: The meeting will be closed as permitted by the attorney-client privilege to discuss strategy related to the following three lawsuits: A. Peter Lanpher and Penny Rogers v. City of Orono and Jay T. Nygard, Kendall M. Nygard, Go Green Energy. Court File No. 27 -CV -17-7166 B. Fred Johnson v. City of Orono C. Matthew C. Johnson; Susanne Johnson; S. David Feldshon; and Archelle Georgiou Feldson v. The City of Orono; et al. Court File No. 27 -CV -17-1030 Hello Gabriel and Vickie, I wanted to follow-up with both of you regarding the AIS harvesting meeting held on October 19, 2018. The first attachment is the LMCD's Meeting Notes that I have edited. Please read this attachment first and review my edits and let me know if you have questions. The second attachment is a side-by-side comparison of harvesting vs. herbicides. If you want to scrutinize these methods, this is a good resource. There are benefits and drawbacks to each method. If you truly wanted to compare these methods in Lake Minnetonka, I would advise trying both methods in 2019 and contrast the results as was outlined in LMCD's 2013 EWM/CLP Management Plan. DNR could provide additional recommendations on how to do so if interested. I would also advocate for a consultant or trained plant surveyor to be involved with data collection in the comparison and creation of the pre -harvest or treatment maps (aka delineations). A delineation will be required by the DNR prior to treatment/harvest for the 2019 season. Lastly on this issue, in terms of the current LMCD AIS harvesting program all agree that additional training (specifically plant ID training) is a good idea for operators of the harvester. I have outlined a few options below in red. Please contact me for additional information on plant ID training. I would prefer that LMCD and those concerned with AIS management make a working plan before the 2019 management season is upon us. I would also encourage folks review the 2013 EWM/CLP Management Plan (attached & highlighted —from LMCD's website). This plan clearly outlines the use of both harvesting and herbicides to manage EWM and CLP throughout Lake Minnetonka. The review of this plan is very timely in my mind. The integration of both methods will be necessary for the success of the AIS management program. In addition, as I stated before, management at this scale and between multiple organizing bodies (LMCD, LIDS, Lake Minnetonka Association, cities, county, etc.) should be coordinated by one person. I continue to advocate that a position be considered to coordinate and assess the effectiveness of AIS monitoring and management efforts on Lake Minnetonka. Please see additional comments (to the email Gabriel provided December 1) below in red. Thank you for your efforts and interest in the area of AIS management on Lake Minnetonka. If you desire a follow-up meeting, I can host it at 1200 Warner Road after the holidays. Kind Regards, Keegan Lund Invasive Species Specialist I Ecological and Water Resources 1200 Warner Road Saint Paul, MN 55106 Phone: 651-259-5828 Email: keegan.lund@state.mn.us Dear Keegan, I hope you are having a wonderful Holiday season and will be able to spend with your family and friends. I want to thank you for your comments about the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District's (LMCD's) harvesting program and want to make sure I clearly understand your position on this matter. You acknowledged that the mechanical weed harvesters increase the risk of spreading invasive species in Lake Minnetonka. To mitigate this risk, the DNR will require the following in wd: 1) As part of their permit application, the LMCD will provide the DNR a map showing locations of where they anticipate harvesting in 2019 and an updated delineation showing locations of flowering rush and other invasive species (excluding Eurasian water milfoil, its hybrids, or curly leaf pondweed.). Because starry stonewort is commonly found at launch sites, I would encourage you to extend this requirement to launch and transfer sites. An updated map or delineation will be required for 2019 invasive plant harvesting areas. The concern that the harvesters may be spreading flowering rush was raised over 10 years ago (see attached memo written by Dick Osgood and shared with the LMCD and DNR in 2009). I hope you can understand my frustration that this issue has never been raised by the LMCD or discussed at their AIS task force. As you can see in the attached diagram, there appears to be a correlation between areas harvested and the spread of flowering rush. I have personal seen the harvesters in these areas. I have also seen the LMCD in other areas that I believe were not reported to the DNR. 2) Mechanical harvesting will not be allowed in areas where flowering rush or other invasives are found DNR permit will state "Do not mechanically harvest in areas where flowering rush is present.". 3) LMCD staff involved with the harvesting program will be trained to identify starry stonewort, flowering rush and other likely invasive plants. I would encourage you to include a requirement for an "action plan" if other invasive plants are found. DNR has encouraged LMCD staff, specifically operators of the harvester, to attend the DNR commercial harvesting training. LMCD has agreed this is a good idea. Plant ID trainings area also offered by the DNR and UMN MAISRC as part of their AIS Detector Program training. This training may also be a good resource for operators of the harvester in terms of AIS identification. While this training is critically important to reduce the spread of invasive species, I am not confident that entry level, part time, temporary summer employees will be able to differentiate starry stonewort or other AIS from Eurasian water milfoil or native plants. The difficulty in identifying these plants is amplified by the monotony of operating a harvester, natural variation of plants, and light conditions. As a member of the State's AIS task force I have heard presentations from several researchers and from your colleagues indicating it is very difficult to differentiate starry stonewort (and other AIS) from native plants. While I still have concerns about how the harvesters are operated, I focused on what I believe is within your statutory authority and what I understood you to say. Please let me know if I characterized your comments accurately. Much has changed since the LMCD's harvesting program began 30 years ago; at no other time has the Lake Minnetonka been at such a high risk of infestation of other species. Also, at no other time has the public been as aware of AIS and as critical of government agencies. If I characterized your comments correctly, I believe they will help address many of the concerns about the harvesting program. If I misunderstood you, I urge you to use your permitting authorities to the extent possible to prevent the spread of AIS. Again, I appreciate how seriously you are taking this matter and wish you and your family joyful Holiday season. Sincerely, Gabriel Jabbour Comparison of Mechanical Harvesting and Herbicides - DRA.F Chip Welling, MnDNR Mechanical Harvesting Herbicides Effectiveness of Control Reliability [difficulty in obtaining Always removes plants Can fail consistent results in different lakes (Potential failure of treatments)] Time to relief Immediate 7 to 14 days Vegetation is collected and Yes No removed from the lake Duration of control (and need for Shorter Longer multiple treatments) Creation of channels Good Not as good Control of plants over a large Not as good? Good area Potential effect on plants outside Little to none May be significant the treated area Additional Considerations Cost Often higher Often lower Time required to complete a Longer Shorter treatment Percentage of cost attributable high low to labor Capital investment High if harvester is purchased None [for customer] Duration of work Continues over the season One or a few days Variability in cost high low Disposal of harvested plants Can be difficult to find a place Not applicable (plants where plants can be delivered decompose in lake) Potential spread of an invasive Should not be employed on lakes Can be employed on lakes where aquatic plant within a lake where the distribution of milfoil the distribution of milfoil is is limited limited Effects on non -target organisms or lake ecosystem Removes invertebrates, fish, Yes No frogs, snakes, turtles, etc When target plant is an invasive, Yes Yes or no, depending on removal or destruction of native particular herbicide used vegetation Increased fragmentation More Less Disturbs sediment and causes Often does, likely to a greater May do so, likely to a lesser suspension of sediment in the extent extent water column, which in turn may reduce water clarity Restrictions on use of water after No In some cases treatment Selectivity Limited or none Some are, some are not Minnesota Regulations (M.R. 6280) Small area can be treated Yes No without a permit to control (limited to nearshore areas) (Always requires a DNR permit) milfoil or other submersed aquatic plants Limit on the amount of area that 50% of the littoral zone 15% of the littoral zone may be treated