My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Re: easement
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
T
>
Tonka Avenue
>
225 Tonka Avenue - 05-117-23-13-0051
>
Correspondence
>
Re: easement
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 5:17:18 PM
Creation date
5/2/2019 12:36:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
225
Street Name
Tonka
Street Type
Avenue
Address
225 Tonka Ave
Document Type
Correspondence
PIN
0511723130051
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� O� <br /> A j <br /> _ CITY of ORONO <br /> GAV Municipal Offices <br /> 1 <br /> Street Address: Mailing Address: <br /> O <br /> Egg 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 <br /> Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323.0066 <br /> August 7, 1996 <br /> Terry Bills <br /> Empire Title Services <br /> 1152 South Robert Street <br /> West St. Paul, MN 55118 <br /> Re: 225 Tonka Avenue - Easement <br /> Dear Ms. Bills: <br /> A 20'x 100'portion of Brook Street on which the subject arae is located was vacated b the <br /> P J garage Y City <br /> in 1984 per City Council Resolution No. 1619(attached). A condition of that vacation was that the <br /> then owners, Scott C. and Debra McLain, grant to the City a Utilities and Access Easement(Doc. <br /> #4888323) over the northerly 15' of the vacated road, for future use by the City. <br /> This easement was granted by the McLain's with the full knowledge that the existing garage <br /> encroaches into the easement. They were advised that the City would accept this encroachment for <br /> the current garage structure, and that because the garage was in disrepair, if at some future date it <br /> was rebuilt, it would have to be relocated out of the easement(See Jeanne Mabusth letter to Richard <br /> Schieffer, April 4, 1984). <br /> No permits have since been issued by the City for repair or replacement of said garage, hence we <br /> assume its status and condition have not changed. <br /> The City may at some future date have a need to make use of the full 15-foot easement for the <br /> specified purposes, hence the City is not readily inclined to vacate or reduce its width at this time. <br /> And,given the location of this easement in relation to the adjacent properties to the north and west, <br /> relocation of the easement elsewhere on the property does not appear to be in the City's best interest. <br /> In regard to'what happens next',I would urge all parties to accept the current situation as-is. In order <br /> to vacate the easement, the Council would have to find that it serves no public purpose. It is my <br /> opinion that this finding could not be made. <br /> Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.