HomeMy WebLinkAboutWetland delineation-2013 3 710 Togo Road — Orono, MN
Wetland Delineation Report For:
Linda Peterson
3710 Togo Road
Orono, MN 55364
arrowhead
0
environmental
u
i
c o n n g
Wetland Consulting Services
Performed by:
Ben Carlson, WDC (#1125)
AEC Project # 2013-027
May 22, 2013
Arrowhead Environmental Consulting
1545 Minnie Avenue
Orono, MN 55364
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Project Overview:
Summary of Project and Results
Report Body:
Introduction 1
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Methods 1
Results. 1
Discussion 2
Data Sources and Literature References 3
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Project Figures and Supporting Data:
Figure 1: Map of Project Location(USGS Topo)
Figure 2: Map of Project Location(MN DNR PWI Map)
Figure 3: Hennepin County Soil Survey
Figure 4: National Wetland Inventory Map
Figure 5: MCWD Wetland Assessment Map
Figure 6: Wetland Delineation Map (GPS Located)
Field Data Collection Forms(Data Sheets)
Photo Log
Project Overview
On May 2"d, 2013 Arrowhead Environmental Consulting (AEC) performed a wetland
delineation at the 3710 Togo Road property located in Orono, MN.
• One wetland basin was delineated within the parcel bounds; Wetland 1 is a
Shallow Marsh located along the northern property line.
• Wetland 1 is indicated on the NWI map as a PEMF wetland.
• Wetland 1 is indicated on the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Public
Water Inventory Map (PWI) as basin 915W.
• Wetland 1 is mapped in the Houghton hydric soil series.
• Wetland 1 is dominated by reed canary grass and cattail species.
• The wetland boundary was generally placed along the vegetative transition from
hydrophytic to non-hydrophytic vegetation (which correlated to a rise in
topography) and where the soil was saturated to the surface.
r r
Introduction
On May 2nd, 2013 Arrowhead Environmental Consulting (AEC) performed a wetland
delineation at the 3710 Togo Road property located in Orono, MN. The legal description
of the project location is: A part of the SW '/ of Section 17, TI 17N, R23W, Hennepin
County, Orono, Minnesota. The parcel is a total of 0.38 acres (according to the Hennepin
County Website).
Methods
AEC utilized the 1987 US Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual and
Midwest Regional Supplement to perform the wetland delineation. A United States
Geological Survey (USGS) Map (Excelsior Quad) (Figure 1), the Minnesota Department
of Natural Resources (MN DNR) Public Water Inventory (PWI) Map (Figure 2), the
Hennepin County Soil Survey Map (Figure 3), the National Wetland Inventory (NWI)
Map (Figure 4), and the MCWD Wetland Assessment Map (Figure 5) were reviewed
prior to the site visit and used in the delineation process. The delineated wetland
boundaries (GPS located) are indicated on Figure 6 and are overlaid on a 2012 aerial
image. AEC used the routine delineation method.
Wetland classification followed methods described by the USACOE - St. Paul District;
Eggers and Reed "Wetland Plants and Plant Communities of MN and WI". The Circular
39 and Cowardin et al. classifications are given as well. The indicator status of plants
was determined using the State of Minnesota— 2012 National Wetlands Plant List Final
Ratings provided by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Cold Regions Research and
Engineering Laboratory.
Pink pinflags were used to delineate the wetlands and were numbered sequentially;
flagging was hung from adjacent vegetation to aid in location of the pinflags. Sample
points were taken to document the vegetation, soils, and hydrology indicators within
representative upland and wetland locations.
Results
Office Results
Wetland 1 is indicated on the NWI map as a PEMF wetland. Wetland 1 is mapped in the
Houghton soil series; the Houghton soil series is classified as a hydric soil (SCS Hydric
Soils of the United States). Wetland 1 is indicated on the Minnesota Department of
Natural Resources Public Water Inventory Map (PWI) as basin 915W. Wetland 1 is
indicated on the MCWD Wetland Assessment Map as a Manage 3 Wetland.
Field Results
Wetland 1
AEC classified Wetland 1 as a Shallow Marsh (Type 3, PEMF) wetland. Wetland 1 is
dominated by reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea) and cattail (Typha). The
adjacent upland area is dominated by boxelder (Acer negundo), red oak (Quercus
macrocarpa), honeysuckle(Lonicera tatarica), and hazel(Corylus americana).
I
The boundary for Wetland 1 exhibited rather steep slopes (a sharp transition in
topography); in general there was a defined transition between the reed canary grass
(wetland) and the red oak, honeysuckle, and hazel (upland). The wetland soil boring met
the A2 (Histic Epipedon) hydric soil indicator with High Water Table, Saturation to the
Surface, Geomorphic Position, and FAC — Neutral Test hydrology indicators present.
The upland soil boring did not meet a hydric soil indicator and was lacking hydrology
indicators. In general, the wetland boundary was placed where the soil was saturated to
the surface.
Discussion
One wetland basin was delineated within the parcel bounds. Areas delineated as wetland
met the three criteria required for a wetland delineation; dominance of hydrophytic
vegetation, presence of hydric soil, and (at a minimum) one primary hydrology indicator
or two secondary hydrology indicators under normal conditions.
In order to be official the wetland delineation must be reviewed and approved by the
Local Government Unit (LGU) and potentially other agencies (Local, State, Federal).
Any work within or adjacent to a wetland will require Wetland Conservation Act (WCA)
permits (and potentially other permits). Please consult with AEC if you plan on filling,
draining, excavating wetlands within your project location.
If you have any questions regarding this report or any questions about our services please
feel free to contact Ben Carlson at any time(612-237-5996).
Q
/Thank you,
-."P, lirre
Ben Carlson, WDC
Ecologist/Owner
Arrowhead Environmental Consulting
2
Data Sources:
USGS Quadrangle Map—Excelsior 7.5-Minute Quadrangle, Minnesota, U.S.A.
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Protected Waters Inventory Map, Hennepin
County 1983 (Revised 1996 data from the Mn DNR Data Deli, online).
Soil Survey of Hennepin County. U.S.D.A. Data obtained from the NRCS/SSURGO
website.
United States Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory Map — Excelsior
Quadrangle. 1991. (Taken from May 1980 aerial photographs).
Aerial Photos were obtained the Land Management Information Center website(2012).
Literature Referenced/Technical Documents:
Environmental Laboratory. 1987. 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands
Delineation Manual. Technical Report Y-87-1, US Army Engineer Waterways
Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi.
U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center. 2010. Regional Supplement to
the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Midwest Region. US Army
Engineer Waterways Experiment Station,Vicksburg, Mississippi.
Eggers, Steve D. and Donald M. Reed. 1997. Wetland Plants and Plant Communities of
Minnesota and Wisconsin. US Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District. 263pp,
unclassified.
Shaw, S.P., and C.G. Fredine. 1956. Wetlands of the United States. U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, Circular 39. 67pp.
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and R.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
FWS/OBS-79/31. 103pp.
Sabine, B. J. 1999. National List of Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: Region 3 —
North Central (Indiana, Illinois, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Wisconsin).
Resource Management Group, Inc. 77pp.
USDA Soil Conservation Service, Washington, D.C., Misc. 2006. Field indicators of
Hydric Soils in the United States. A guide for Identifying and Delineating Hydric Soils,
Version 6.0
National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils. 1991. Hydric Soils of the United States.
USDA Soil Conservation Service, Washington, D.C., Misc. Publication Number 1491.
1991.
3
I /
I
Fi ures
- ` ,lllt� �' I
_94 4"1!4 '• r
IY ri3udd,',• �+ ' 9)i~•'yt •t
ri n
•+�'� 11'.1 / +1- 1:`�•
t`}�` •/• '{ Project Location i-LA tr r':�w�,,; �•'i/i\/'
�.'Sr• t� 1. �' 11 •
•'+ "• 'r/.•�. / 1 1 �.1�!• 1i, .TO O�� +iy�';Y y.-/:•�ti�� Oa+ •/'. �����.CCCC____' ♦
A*I .. 1•�yl'•,/► �• •y•i ' '� '•-
IL .�1,- `+-1• .. , ..•*'.r.• r4/: ••`, �.`•tl�• `'•rt'r�'
`r •' ;r �i - �::. 'ry •�•. +•��'y,��•i• •' - �y:� } .•�. al+'•J,-1 '1/-�` M. ,/, •1�ti1Y1
�•; /;}-.; h. ►. 'tib•'ti,'}�
`/�`j.r•,1C•�•: / ••+ +•'/• `;. .1 :� .�`y�� C��• �- 1 • ..{�� `��!, ;�4 /•'ila�'` ��./ , •'•if'• '1: ��y�`
SLY• ,., y •, .t •`}` • ,��ti=: �.t ./: '1 We- M,
+•. dry t, :yl['• L• r' ./ ••;t,•• �•:�` 1 '
.4'` -v l';:d.p �:�' • , r/•:. y: i • `r;'?;I•�: y -1+, `1 Jl 1t Y1/•V�:• ,'..ti� ,/ _ ./•�1.
��•-F', '/ i•., �:.. �' 1 / �% �.; Ir^y:, -•�.��1iL'�:�.:f��t-;;,ti rlti�.e�t ,1•/:ti �: •��,`
:•/ i.�. ;. ;.Ix .. tii► .y'1.' Iti 0.4%+ r,.:Kr'�IY•,•t'ti. 11t..cy r/T1
;' i/•+',dr
_ /" + 1�•� s:�i•;�1++.'•.. : • • - tiv Irs�l'�ifi.'`G.•1'+••~L�:•�•�}i../'-y°ISi•.:�..•y'�� .I X1:'1 �:����f '4'� ,, y
i
ti
ap`etol�`" ,�• IILy '',y.': , � . ,<.ti•/_ , / ti ..yp.•..,.I1` ils�l' ++{•},�Y-�;i:,�1/�••t �y'...
,, �•� 1: �M�t!JJ,�` ,•��:�t 4 I�,te��• ti�r+•� -/' + :_L,<':t'�r�v�-1 L: .I-j�L
4; '/:1 -FF�r Wit•~/t •• •� �' er11+�Y/ y� ••, .fr:• 'y`/�`:Crf�/Stdl. •1/•ti �,/
MM Ir
error �: �. ,► •i �; •►'. _ •y, �•..: � Livingston
r_ t•�. F, •"��y '1.. t': 'i:: 'i'.1 �1 I y .r 01 '�., ,1 t::��. +C�.
,�:'�: ,vti1t:/ <'. 'ti •.. '+ l .ti Ir.=•", ,+t/, ,C r /, /r. v•t
,r, nr ,�S r.;;1`r� :i ,, "lIL CIr;rf ;� /ry 1.. :ti: +tyi�::'�'• m /r• •••'�• Lyric �. 1• ,
It e�6 t
•1 �� ti �, ?I. ':`; y,• sY 1•`, w•"` f:-•.i} ;4/r �,r,'3".�,,. �Z -t•a �
,/ .. r���` , '"„ J 1111 +� +,' r , ':ti:r.• /i �r ••?,/^?•:�y:l;•1/ l� �1••'
Sr1 Sr/• / 1'� r`+ •r�� y. �, :r Shoreline 1:`5•' ./•.
`I • �'`iii''-S Citi �; ++' ._ ..y •.,. ,tii• r•• 1`, •y�! 1i+. '1_.1 1',,'4�
Map of Project Location
Overlaid on USGSTopo Map
arrowhead ®Approximate Parcel Boundary Figure 1
C'_l� (I �_}illllt`Illctl Feet
3790 Tog Rd
c ( ;I s I I 1 l I 1 0 250 500 1,000 orun•l. MIA
Project Loi ition
7
Map of Project Location {
( Overlaid on MN DNR PWI Map
arrowhead approximate Parcel Boundary Figure 2
C II]\ Feet
11710 Togo Rd
C O ,1 s 11 1 t I I1 Cr 0 250 500 1,000 Orono 1N
.rr1..�,. esa+ ► r a �� � •.. Te+ y�? •y • '3 p �y �. ,�r,.p� �,.*"a
* 1r e +� *W §� P#'„ 7 ".• Jft
NA
a -
txo
� �Xj, ) ♦ '�+ �yr« �' �` 'r'?Y�,yff,'F`�a'gad„ �� "�' " � ��. �' �
", t .�� ',f h�.��° �� . 3�..3" -IA 's � • '! *.d: L "� +• �.. ���"�„
ry x
x.- s 100, b«F
y� l e
b
,
x
1 p.
" s
a
c
e
n s i
yk a,
G 3p+r
1
aa" a
y
s , x
K ,l * ! �' .!►
Alt_ �I�f� •� �?
w�
1 4
•
R
f
yA
m�
A
z
5
«
R
< at
v «
g
' r WW
'
iw
w
44
A jr
Ilk
' r ^
T
t ,
a
r
r
• � 4 ,
}
f'
its
'iv„
',p
r
i sz
r
, -
r � ,
P ♦ -'-': c °•^rim
x
t >
afi,.ae rr aw a
1 �
bks, s g'
Wetland
nt ,
y� t
1
F'fi ff u
V
W
�4
x
t
Approximate Parcel Boundary GPS Wetland Boundary Sample Point
Wetland Delineation Map ,lam
Overlaid on 2012 Aerial Image
arrowhead Figure 6
C_ll 11`011111CI1tal Feet '710 Togo Rd
C (? n s 11 1 t l tl 0 25 50 100 aronc,. h7t4
Supporting Data
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Midwest Region
Project/Site:3710 Togo Road City/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: 5/2/2013
Applicant/Owner: Linda Peterson State: MN Sampling Point: 1-1 Wet
Investigator(s): BPC(WDC#1125) Section,Township,Range: SW 1/4 Sec. 17,T1 17N,R23W
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Basin Local relief(concave,convex,none): Concave
Slope(%): 1 Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name Houghton(Hydric) VWI Classification: PEMF
Are climaticthydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no,explain in remarks)
Are vegetation soil or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances"
Are vegetation soil or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed,explain any answers in remarks.)
Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y
Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetland? Y
Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Y f yes,optional wetland site ID:
Remarks:(Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.)
VEGETATION--Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominan Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) %Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species
1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 20 Y FACW that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 3 (A)
2 Total Number of Dominant
3 Species Across all Strata: 3 (B)
4 Percent of Dominant Species
5 that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100.00% (A/B)
20 =Total Cover
Saolino/Shrub straturT (Plot size: 15' ) Prevalence Index Worksheet
1 Total%Cover of:
2 OBL species 20 x 1 = 20
3 FACW species 100 x 2= 200
4 FAC species 0 x 3= 0
5 FACU species 0 x 4= 0
0 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0
Herb stratum (Plot size: 5' ) Column totals 120 (A) 220 (B)
1 Phalaris arundinacea 80 Y FACW Prevalence Index=B/A= 1.83
2 Typha latifolia 20 Y OBL
3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
4 —Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation
5 X Dominance testis>50%
6 X Prevalence index is=3.0*
7 Morphogical adaptations*(provide
8 supporting data in Remarks or on a
g _separate sheet)
10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation*
100 =Total Cover _(explain)
Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30' ) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
1 present,unless disturbed or problematic
2 Hydrophytic
0 =Total Cover vegetation
present? Y
Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet)
SOIL Sampling Point: 1-1 Wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc** Texture Remarks
0-8 N2.5/0 100 Oa(Sapric)
8-14 N2.5/0 100 Sandy loam
w ww
Type:C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. Location:PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils:
Histisol(Al) _Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L,R)
X Histic Epipedon(A2) _Sandy Redox(S5) _Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L).
_Black Histic(A3) _Stripped Matrix(S6) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R)
_Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) _Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R)
_Stratified Layers(A5) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
2 cm Muck(A10) _Depleted Matrix(F3) _Other(explain in remarks)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _Redox Dark Surface(F6)
_Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) `Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand
_Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or
problematic
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type: Hydric soil present? Y
Depth(inches):
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that aoDly) Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required
Surface Water(Al) _Aquatic Fauna(613) _Surface Soil Cracks(136)
X High Water Table(A2) _True Aquatic Plants(1314) _Drainage Patterns(1310)
X Saturation(A3) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
Water Marks(81) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots_Crayfish Burrows(C8)
Sediment Deposits(62) (C3) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Drift Deposits(133) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
Algal Mat or Crust(134) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils X Geomorphic Position(D�)
Iron Deposits(65) (C6) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) _Thin Muck Surface(C7)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138) _Gauge or Well Data(D9)
Water-Stained Leaves(139) _Other(Explain in Remarks)
FieldObservations:
Surface water present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Water table present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 2 Indicators of wetland
Saturation present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 0 hydrology present? Y
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe recorded data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Midwest Region
Project/Site:3710 Togo Road City/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: 5/2/2013
Applicant/Owner: Linda Peterson State: MN Sampling Point: 1-1 Up
Investigator(s): BPC(WDC#1125) Section,Township,Range: SW 1/4 Sec. 17,T117N,R23W
Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Slope Local relief(concave,convex,none): Concave
Slope(%): 5 Lat: Long: Datum:
Soil Map Unit Name Lester(Non-Hydric) VWI Classification: None
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no,explain in remarks)
Are vegetation soil or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances"
Are vegetation soil or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed,explain any answers in remarks.)
Hydrophytic vegetation present? N
Hydric soil present? N Is the sampled area within a wetland? N
Indicators of wetland hydrology present? N f yes,optional wetland site ID:
Remarks:(Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.)
VEGETATION--Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominan Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30' ) %Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species
1 Acer negundo 30 Y FAC that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 1 (A)
2 Quercus rubra 20 Y FACU Total Number of Dominant
3 Species Across all Strata: 4 (B)
4 Percent of Dominant Species
5 that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 25.00% (A/B)
50 =Total Cover
Saolino/Shrub stratum (Plot size: 15' ) Prevalence Index Worksheet
1 Corylus americana 20 Y FACU Total%Cover of:
2 Lonicera tatarica 10 Y FACU OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
3 FACW species 0 x 2= 0
4 FAC species 30 x3= 90
5 FACU species 50 x4= 200
30 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0
Herb stratum (Plot size: 5' ) Column totals 80 (A) 290 (B)
1 Prevalence Index=B/A= 3.63
2
3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
4 —Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation
5 _Dominance test is>50%
6 _Prevalence index is=3.0*
7 Morphogical adaptations*(provide
8 supporting data in Remarks or on a
9 —separate sheet)
10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation*
0 =Total Cover _(explain)
Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30' ) Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be
1 present,unless disturbed or problematic
2 Hydrophytic
0 =Total Cover vegetation
present? N
Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet)
SOIL Sampling Point: 1-1 Up
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type* Loc** Texture Remarks
0-16 10YR 3/2 100 Sandy loam
*Type:C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. —Location:PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix
Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils:
Histisol(Al) _Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L,R)
_Histic Epipedon(A2) _Sandy Redox(S5) _Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L)
_Black Histic(A3) _Stripped Matrix(S6) _5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R)
_Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) _Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R)
_Stratified Layers(A5) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12)
2 cm Muck(A10) _Depleted Matrix(F3) _Other(explain in remarks)
_Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _Redox Dark Surface(F6)
_Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand
_Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Redox Depressions(178) hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or
problematic
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type: Hydric soil present? N
Depth(inches):
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) Secondary Indicators minimum of two reciuired
Surface Water(Al) _Aquatic Fauna(613) _Surface Soil Cracks(136)
High Water Table(A2) _True Aquatic Plants(614) _Drainage Patterns(610)
Saturation(A3) _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
Water Marks(131) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots_Crayfish Burrows(C8)
Sediment Deposits(132) (C3) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Drift Deposits(133) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
Algal Mat or Crust(134) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils _Geomorphic Position(D2)
Iron Deposits(135) _(C6) _FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) _Thin Muck Surface(C7)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138) _Gauge or Well Data(D9)
Water-Stained Leaves(139) _Other(Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:
Surface water present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Water table present? Yes No X Depth(inches): indicators of wetland
Saturation present? Yes No X Depth(inches): hydrology present? N
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe recorded data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
i
p , w
y
• x.
IV
(,W ,
. � gyp. • . �...
r r• , y
-
.
LSP •.
4 -
s-
r.
'M