Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-25-1991 Council Minutesa MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING — NOVEMBER 25, 1991 ROLL The Council met on the above date with the following members present: Mayor Barbara Peterson, Councilmembers Gabriel Jabbour, Edward Callahan and Mary Butler.. , J. Diann Goetten was absent. The following represented the City staff: City Administrator Ron Moorse, Public Works Director John Gerhardson, Building & Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator Michael Gaffron, City Attorney Tom Barrett, City Engineer Glenn Cook, and City Recorder Teri Naab. Mayor Peterson called the meeting to order at 7:03 P.M. (##1) CONSENT AGENDA Callahan added Items 3, 4, 5 and 8 and removed Item 11. Mayor Peterson also wanted Item 11 to be removed. It was moved by Butler, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to approve the Consent Agenda, with the inclusion of Items 3, 4, 5 and 8 and with the exclusion of Item 11. Ayes 4, nays 0. Gaffron noted the applicant was present for Item 4, and thought perhaps they should discuss this issue. Butler amended her motion to exclude Item 4. Motions for all items adopted by consent agenda will be included in the minutes in their respective numerical order. ( *##2) APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Butler, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to approve the minutes of the regular Orono Council meeting held on November 12, 1991 Ayes 4,'nays 0. PUBLIC COMMENTS Norm Paurus asked the Council to share the latest news of the DNR's consideration of buying property on Maxwell Bay. Moorse noted they have not received information from the DNR to date. There .was a meeting with them several weeks ago at which the DNR indicated a plan or specific proposal would not be available until mid — December. He noted that staff and the City Attorney are looking at what controls the City ordinances have over the DNR in their proposal, and will be putting together a letter to the DNR addressing concerns of the City. Paurus suggested that the Council look at the overall picture of property in that area, and urge the DNR to do something jointly to improve the situation in that area. 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING — NOVEMBER 25, 1991 T. 0 PUBLIC COMMENTS — C N Jabbour noted that he attended a meeting of the Lake Minnetonka Homeowners' Association at which the group discussed their opposition of -the landing. He stated that the Sailor newspaper quoted him as saying "a trade —off maybe could be made with regards to this issue and Highway 12 ", which was construed that Orono was receptive to condemnation of private property. He noted that the minutes reflected his position that Orono is not receptive to taking private property, but only of commercial property when it is for sale to help reduce user density in an area. He stated that something needs to be done to improve the situation in that area. He felt the City should wait to see what the LMCD was willing to do about the issue. He stated that the Governor's Task Force specifically stated that no additional landings are needed in Zone 1, and Maxwell Bay is within Zone 1. He indicated that with what the DNR is proposing, they would be breaking every shoreland- regulation they currently are working to implement. (##3) ##1551 ROBERT WAADE, WILDHURST ESTATES PLAT — EXECUTION OF AMENDED PLAT MYLAR It was moved by Butler, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to execute amended mylars for the Wildhurst Estates plat. Ayes 4, nays 0. (##4) ##1682 CHRISTINE BRICKLEY, 3262 NORTH SHORE DRIVE — VARIANCE Gary Delarious was present for this application. Moorse explained that staff had not heard from applicant regarding this application until that day. Delarious stated that they had estimates to move the garage which ranged from $1850 to $3200, and an additional $1500 to pour a new slab. He noted that the garage will cost close to $10,000 if it is required to be moved. He requested the Council to allow it to remain in its present position. He also thought the Council only met once a month and that is why he did not not contact staff prior to the meeting. Butler noted that applicant's request should be put in writing and submitted to staff. She noted that at the last meeting it was suggested that applicant and staff work together to find other alternatives. She felt there was not enough information in their packet to act on the application. Moorse noted to the applicant that the next meeting of the Council is scheduled for December 9, 1991. It was moved by Callahan, seconded.-by Mayor Peterson, to table Application ##1682, Christine Brickley, 3262 North Shore Drive, to allow applicant time to meet with staff to discuss possible alternatives. Ayes 4, nays 0. 2 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING — NOVEMBER 25, 1991 ( #5) #1683 ROBERT F. SUESS 2590 WATERTOWN ROAD — PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION — RESOLUTION #3045 It was moved by Butler, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to adopt Resolution #3045 for Application #1683 for Robert F. Suess, 2590 Watertown Road, approving preliminary plat approval. Ayes 4, nays 0. ( * #6) #1689 TERRY SADLER, 1396 BALDUR PARK ROAD — VARIANCES — RESOLUTION #3046 It was moved by Butler, seconded by Jabbour, to adopt Resolution #3046 for Application #1689 for Terry Sadler of 1396 Baldur Park Road, for variances to construct a three season porch in place of a deck. ( #7) #1691 CITY OF LONG LAKE, 130 ORONO ORCHARD ROAD NORTH — PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION — COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT Jeff Roos was present for this application. Moorse noted that the Planning Commission recommended approval of this application. Mabusth explained this application is a request for preliminary subdivision approval of a 13 lot PRD, conditional use permit and a comprehensive plan amendment to provide sewer and water to the lots. She noted that sewer and water will be provided by Long Lake to be credited against Long Lake's allowance. An area variance would need to be approved as the property contains 24.5 acres where 26 acres are required. A public road is proposed, with a future extension to the railroad to serve property on the north side of the railroad. The City is recommending conceptual direction pending receipt of a grading plan. She indicated that the roadway has been shifted northward, and will require filling in that area to raise the roadway. Mabusth indicated that covenants will be filed in the chain —of —title governing future development when property is relocated within the City of Long Lake. The Planning Commission made suggestions for development criteria in the covenant which are noted in the memo. Mabusth received a call from Mr. Palmer, property owner -to the east, to discuss limiting access. Palmer wanted no permanent or temporary vehicular access by the Long Lake residents of this subdivision to the private road within Orono. Roos explained a grading plan will be finaled and reviewed with Orono staff the following Monday. Mayor Peterson questioned the outlot extending to Wolf's property. 3 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING — NOVEMBER 25, 1951 #1691 — CONT. Mabusth explained there is an outlot proposed for a future road to the railroad track to serve properties on the north side of the railroad, for potential development of 16 to 50 units. Butler noted the plat does not specify which area is considered future roadway. Mabusth noted the road will be platted through the exception. Easements will need to be acquired from the MWCC to allow completion of the roadway. Butler questioned whether the owner of Lot 12 may loose dry buildable land to provide an easement for the roadway if one cannot be obtained from the MWCC. Roos noted the citing of the exception was mandated by the location of the underpass. He noted there is no possibility of moving the roadway further eastward. He stated that they haven't decided whether to deal with the MWCC as a part of this plat. Roos noted that Wolf's property is marginal for development. Jabbour was uncomfortable that this issue needed to be resolved quickly, which is now including access to the Wolf property. He understood that no other development would ever exit onto this road.. Roos reiterated that it is a marginal developable property, but because it does have a zoning district, they provided access for a possibility of future development. Jabbour stated he wanted to make it clear that Orono does not want any additional traffic other than from this subdivision to access onto Orono Orchard Road. Roos understood the Council's position, but noted because of the underpass, felt it should be retained as an outlot as historically there was some type of access to the Wolf property. Jabbour noted that historically the property being developed was in Orono. Barrett injected that another limiting factor may be that the underpass is not fully constructed or would need extensive work and could be very expensive. Mabusth noted it is the same size as the underpass to Watertown Road. Callahan noted he is not in favor of providing access for the Wolf property through Orono, and he recalled this was covered many times during negotiation. 9 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING — NOVEMBER 259 1991 ##1691 — CONT. Butler felt the citizens of Orono would be upset that they were providing for a shortcut from Highway 12 through the subdivision and onto Orono Orchard Road. Barrett asked Roos to comment on the suggested covenant language by the Planning Commission. Roos commented that Item 2C indicates more of a concern for the south property along Orono Oaks Drive. 'Mabusth noted that is correct. Roos questioned Item 6. Mabusth noted that buildable lots are described as pads until the final plat, at which time they will be noted as lots. Jabbour asked if any comments had been received from the City of Long Lake.regarding these covenants. Mabusth noted that the memo had been sent to the City Council but to date no comment had been received. Mabusth reiterated Council's position that the exception of the road should not be shown as an outlot with a future extension. Jabbour noted that the existing road can remain, but it cannot extend to any other development. Roos noted the City of Long Lake's intention to indicate this roadway as an outlot, to be held in reserve in case private access is needed under the tracks. He would need to discuss this issue with the City Attorney. Jabbour noted it could be added to the covenant that the roadway cannot serve any other development to provide through traffic. Roos noted it will serve the lift station. Butler recognized that, but indicated the intent would be to not allow through traffic under the railroad bridge through the development to Orono Orchard Road. Butler questioned the utility easement that cuts through the middle of Lot 1. Roos noted there is a forcemain located there now and they are working with the MWCC to see if that main can be relocated. Butler felt it would be an inhibitor for any future builder on that lot. 'She asked if there was a way to reconfigure the lots to avoid this. 5 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING — NOVEMBER 251 1881 ##1691 — CONT. Mabusth noted that the lots have already been -reconfigured because of the configuration of dry buildable area and the higher elevations to the northeast, Lot 1, Block 2 must remain as proposed. The developer will once again be asked to address the issue of relocating the force main: may not be possible to avoid this easement. She asked the Council if they had any other development criteria, or comments on the Planning Commission's recommendation of covenant language. Charles Kelley, Planning Commission representative, noted the Commission's main goal was to protect Orono residents to the south. He felt they should try to restrict uses such as home occupation and accessory structure storage. Butler noted the proposed berm along the southern lot line. Kelley noted the first 3 lots along Orono Oaks Drive could be bermed but after that the elevations prohibit berming. He noted that trees may be used for screening these properties. He felt the City has the option through the PRD process to add conditions of development. Mayor Peterson asked Barrett if he felt the covenant language was specific enough. Barrett felt that under the agreement with Long Lake, the City, can set forth reasonable requirements. He noted if the covenants are too restrictive, the whole development may fall apart. He felt the City should look at general conditions, and provide for -some procedure that would allow a developer to readjust the covenants to a reasonable degree. Jabbour asked about enforcing restrictive covenants. Barrett noted they can be enforced by injunction, which would require applying to district court. He noted the plan is to provide the City with a legal document that gives authority in specific areas. Jabbour felt Orono should decide what is essential to protect its residents to the south of the development. Jim Palmer felt the request for a berm had been misinterpreted, as they were trying to limit access from owners of the new development from their back yards to Orono Oaks Drive. Barrett noted they can covenant that access could not be allowed from these lots to Orono Oaks Drive. Roos noted in the past they have found berms to be ineffective for this purpose, and felt that screening of another kind may be more effective. 2 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING — NOVEMBER 25, 19 @1 #1691 — CONT. Callahan agreed that access should be limited from the lots along the southern boundary to protect Orono residents in that area. Mabusth noted there will be a meeting on December 2nd at 9:30 a.m. with Mr. Roos, Glenn Cook. She noted she will be meeting with Barrett to draft covenants. Jabbour felt a copy of the draft covenants should be sent to the Planning Commission for comment. Callahan felt that the comments by staff and the City Attorney seem appropriate for inclusion in the covenants. It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Butler, to direct staff and the City Attorney to proceed with their plan to develop covenants that fit into the scope of the discussion for Application #1691 for the City of Long Lake for development of property at 130 Orono Orchard Road North. He requested staff to continue to obtain the additional information which is necessary for final determination of road location and grading, and directed staff to report back to the Council at their December 9th meeting with the covenants and necessary documents. He noted this approval does not provide for a future roadway to the Wolf property on the north side of the railroad tracks. Ayes 4, nays 0. Butler noted they are looking to protect Orono residents and wish to curtail through traffic. Mabusth asked the Council to consider any other findings that may be appropriate in granting the variance for the lot area. MAYOR /COUNCIL REPORT A) Butler wished all a Happy Thanksgiving. B) Callahan noted that Susan Wilson, of.the Park Commission, has been named the head of the Nature Conservancy. C) Jabbour felt they could expect a substantial turnout at their next meeting for the Maxwell Bay issue. He noted that residents feel the City should be doing something to prevent the project. He noted that the expiration on the option to buy the land is mid to late December and the public information meeting isn't scheduled until January. D) Mayor Peterson noted the Council received a letter from Dr. Sutter regarding the Stubbs Bay sewer project, and she requested the letter be retained with the minutes in the file. E) Mayor Peterson noted a notice that she received from the MWCC requesting attendance at their December 4th meeting. She indicated those that wished to attend could contact Moorse. 7 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING — NOVEMBER 25, 1991 ( *#k8) PAY REQUEST ##1 LIFT STATION NO. 11 RENOVATION It was moved by Butler, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to approve Pay Request No. 1 for Lift Station No. 11 renovation to Northwest Mechanical Inc. for the amount of $30,590.00. Ayes 4, nays 0. (##9) COUNTY ROAD 15 SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS Pat Murphy, Director of Hennepin County Public Works, and Bruce Polichik, Design Engineer were present for this issue. Murphy noted.the County has looked at County Road 15 with regards to safety concerns. He noted in the near future it will require major maintenance, which may be a good time for other concerns to be addressed. He noted he has met with the City of Minnetonka Beach, who is very interested in a feasibility study for County Road 15. He stated that in 1984 the Orono Council adopted a resolution with requirements that called for variances to the State standards to require less than what is required for the roadway. He noted that variance allows for a 2 lane roadway with 8' shoulders to be constructed. He suggested that they explore a concept of what could be done before final details are designed. He indicated that they may be able to develop a project using State aid funds. He suggested they start from scratch in development'of a preliminary design to cover most concerns, and felt this portion may be ready by Spring of 1992. He noted the project may not commence for 3 -4 years. Mayor Peterson agreed that the project is necessary, and reiterated the Council is only approving a 2 lane roadway. Murphy agreed and noted the most difficult areas will be where the road is close to the lake. He noted they will also try to address some drainage concerns along the road. Jabbour asked if the traffic counts on the road will have substantial impact on the design of the road. Murphy noted that traffic already dictates a 4 lane road. Jabbour noted that placement of the Highway 12 corridor may impact the roadway considerably. Callahan asked if the County has considered the impact on their budget the proposed corridor. He noted citizens may be appreciative if the County were to use its influence to deter additional need for 4 lane roads within the area. Murphy noted the County has taken the approach that they should stay out of the Highway 12 decision. Jabbour asked about the difficulty in obtaining funding for the project. 8 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING — NOVEMBER 251 1991 COUNTY ROAD 15 SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS — CONT. Murphy noted the ability to do road work is limited to State aid funding. Callahan felt they should go ahead and do the study. Murphy noted. that the project may not be able to fully address all concerns related to the road. Butler commented that major maintenance is long overdue for County Road 15, and felt that they should commence with whatever improvements they could do to improve public safety while still maintaining a 2 lane road. She noted the original intent of the roadway was that it should be paved the way it is driven. . Butler asked if the entire roadway would need to be dug up entirely and felt that the roadway should allow for local access at all times. Murphy noted it may need to be entirely tore up, but access would always be provided for local traffic and emergency vehicles. It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Butler, to request Hennepin County, I in the interest of public safety, to conduct a feasibility study regarding the creation of passing and turning lanes on County Road 15 within Orono, while maintaining the highway as a 2 lane road. Ayes 4, nays 0. ( #10) OPTIONS FOR MARINA LICENSE REVIEW Gaffron noted he is looking for direction regarding 1992 marina licenses, and felt the Council has two options: 1. To commence the review process with a Committee, following staff review, and to resolve any issues. 2. To issue the license as an administrative function and to deal with the issues as they come up. Jabbour felt it would be appropriate to follow the second option. Mayor Peterson disagreed. Jabbour noted he sensed frustration about allowing the DNR proposal, when at the same time Orono allows hundreds of boats with the marina license. He felt there should be a commercial site plan review for marinas which would deal with land use issues comprehensively. He noted that the City started issuing licenses based on number of docks, and now dockage is controlled by the LMCD. He felt the City should ensure that marinas are functioning within the code requirements within residential neighborhoods to allow the best protection of rights of the residents. 9 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING — ,NOVEMBER 25, 1991 OPTIONS FOR MARINA LICENSE REVIEW — CONT. el Butler noted that Jabbour is suggesting that marina licenses be limited to land use solely. Mayor Peterson asked if this review would be done annually. Jabbour felt it should be done once and those violating conditions of approval should be taken to court. Callahan noted he had no objection to the theory. He felt they should start by sending a letter to each marina operator who failed to submit a 1991 application, and telling them they cannot open for business the following year until licenses have been brought up to date. He felt that if a marina is in violation of the code, the operation should cease for a pre— determined time period. Jabbour reiterated that the reason they had suggested a credit was because licenses had not been issued as required. He noted that only 1 marina did not pay the 1991 fee, and they should be required to do so. Gaffron reviewed that 2 -3 years ago, Council was approached by operators to waive the slip fee as the lake was down and business was not doing so well. He noted that one year the gas station was allowed not to apply for a license and did not open that year, but Council stated they would not lose their right to reopen. He noted the 1991 application and fee has not been received from Windward Marine, Lakeside sent in the application but asked that the previous year's fee be applied to 1991 license, and Gayles sent the base fee but no slip fee. All other marinas have paid the 1991 fee. He noted that making all marinas to pay up to date may not be in keeping with past Council's decisions. Callahan noted that if that were true, the slip fee was waived for only one year. He felt they should pay up or cease business. Butler noted that they should forget the past and deal with the present. She felt that they should address land use issues, and parking should not be tied to number of slips. She noted the City needs to look at individual issues. She felt this was a new year with a new Council and they shouldn't go back for past due fees. Gaffron requested confirmation that the Council now does not want to allow credits from past years, and everyone who wants to open in 1992 must make application for a license and pay past due fees. 10 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING — NOVEMBER 231 1901 OPTIONS FOR MARINA LICENSE REVIEW — CONT. Jabbour felt they still had to be unfair to make certain mar others not to. He felt staff dealing with 1992 licenses. require licenses for the next the previous year. Therefore was licensed for that year. issue 1991 licenses, and it would inas pay for the license and allow should come up with a proposal for He noted that the LMCD will now year to be issued in December of the City would know in January who Callahan noted they may need to make amendments to the code, and felt it was unfair not to deal with the 1991 license. Mayor Peterson felt the money for 1991 should either be refunded or credited. Gaffron suggested that all marinas be required to pay the 1991 fees outstanding and apply for a 1992 license and pay the required fees. If the Council feels the code needs to be amended, have the Lake Use Committee work on the necessary amendments. Mayor Peterson suggested there be a deadline for the.1992 fees and after that a penalty fee be assessed. Gaffron noted the fee schedule provides for a $50 late fee. Callahan noted that the way to make these marinas conform is to close their business until they are within the requirements of the code. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Peterson, after further consideration, the Council directs staff to notify marinas 'who have not yet paid the 1991 license fee that they should pay before the end of 1991 before the Council will consider the 1992 license. Ayes 4, nays 0. Callahan noted that with the time the Lake Use Committee has been given to revise the shoreland regulations, there probably will not be time to also revise the marina regulations. Jabbour noted he has difficulty requiring a 1992 license fee based on slippage, which Orono doesn't govern. Barrett explained that they can regulate the land use for marinas, and the number of'slips is a measure of regulating land use. Jabbour noted that the City shouldn't charge based on the number of slips. He asked Barrett the outcome of litigation in Excelsior regarding a marina owner. Barrett explained that the marina owner applied to extend his docks, and the judge appears to have held that the LMCD may have wrongfully prevented him from doing so. 11 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING — ,NOVEMBER 25, 1991 OPTIONS FOR MARINA LICENSE REVIEW — CONT. Jabbour asked if that decision rendered any rights to the LMCD to regulate on —shore activities, such as drystacking. Barrett was unfamiliar with any court case that gave the LMCD those rights. Callahan noted a letter from the LMCD stating they would be glad to regulate land use for marinas, and they intended to start with lighting of docks. (##11) SPATES AVENUE TRAFFIC CONCERNS Moorse noted this is regarding concerns by homeowners that live on Spates Avenue about excessive traffic on the residential street. Gerhardson noted that alternatives were looked at and the proposal before the Council to barricade Spates Avenue with berming was agreed upon. Butler asked how effective berming could be accomplished, and asked if a person could still use Railroad Avenue. Gerhardson noted that for now it would be done with just a pile of sand at the intersection of Spates Avenue and Brown Road. He noted persons could still turn onto Spates Avenue and then down Railroad Avenue. Mayor Peterson asked if this could be considered precedence setting. Gerhardson noted that in similar situations, definitely. Dan Crear, Spates Avenue, submitted a petition from residents requesting the 'closing. Callahan felt that to close a public road, everyone in the City would need to be notified. He did not believe the road should be cut off. He believed that the increase in the traffic count on the road indicates that the public wants to use the road. Mayor Peterson agreed with Callahan to a certain degree. She reiterated that it is a public road, and felt the public should be notified. Jabbour noted that -he felt the public should be notified and stated that he had gotten a call from a resident asking about the issue and Jabbour told him he was unaware of anything going on the road. He felt everyone should be notified. RIK MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL M99TINB = N 0V €M @9R 99; 1991 SPATES AVENUE TRAFFIC CONCERNS — CONT. Terry Morse, Spates Avenue, reiterated that the Council had commented that they did not want to encourage a cut off road through the Long Lake subdivision, and here was the same type of situation. He noted there are 7 driveways on the road of 1 block long. He noted there are 10 kids that live on that street and there are about 800 cars a day using the road. He felt these people using the road are only saving minutes by not using the County Road. Callahan noted County Road 51 is very difficult to use at times. Morse stated that the purpose of the road was to be a neighborhood road. Crear noted that if the public is told of the closing, they probably will be against the closing as they are using the roadway. Butler felt that the Crystal Bay residents may be opposed to the closing, but the majority of Orono probably doesn't even know where Spates Avenue is located. Crear noted again the Council's position of not wanting to create a short cut off Highway 12, but they will allow it elsewhere. He noted the road was not intended for this type of traffic load. He noted the police using the road so much, that when there is a problem, they run them down Spates Avenue rather than County Road 51. Butler had no problem with blocking off the road, but noted it should be done temporarily at first. She asked if it wouldn't be better to block the road at County Road 15. Morse indicated that had been suggested but the City decided for maintenance purposes it would be better blocked at Brown Road. Butler suggested that prior to the close, signs stating when the road will be closed should be posted. Callahan reiterated that he is not in favor of closing the road and noted that all roads in the area are overused. He stated that is a fact of life. He also noted that Wolf cannot get a curb cut from the State off Highway 12, so that is not an issue. He felt this would be precedent setting. Butler felt if it is a question of public safety, just do it. Jabbour stated that if the property Long Lake is proposing for subdivision were to remain in Orono, the street would be private and that would eliminate the entire issue. , 13 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING — _NOVEMBER 25, 1991 SPATES AVENUE TRAFFIC CONCERNS — CONT. Crear agreed that other roads in the area are overloaded. He noted a road that the City closed near Minnetonka Beach which is similar to this situation. He stated that after the sewer was put in, the road was repaved at a wider and straighter width. Jabbour felt there should be a public hearing. He asked if Gerhardson had considered speed bumps and felt they are very effective. Gerhardson noted the public hearing could be scheduled for the last meeting in January. Butler suggested that it be held at the first meeting in January. It was moved by Mayor Peterson, seconded by Jabbour, to schedule a public hearing regarding the Spates Avenue traffic concerns, as soon as possible. Ayes 3, nays 1. Butler voted nay. ( * #12) STUBBS BAY SEWER STUDY AREA ` ORDER PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS — RESOLUTION #3047 It was moved by Butler, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to adopt Resolution #3047, ordering plans and specifications and accept bids for the Stubbs Bay Sewer Study Area to be prepared by the City Engineer. Ayes 4, nays 0. ( * #13) PROPOSED 1992 FEE SCHEDULE — ORDINANCE #99, SECOND SERIES It was moved by Butler, seconded by Mayor Peterson, Ordinance #99, Second Series, adopting the 1992 fee Ayes 4, nays 0. ( * #14) VOLUNTEER COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS to adopt schedule. It was moved by Butler, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to accept the information regarding volunteer commission appointments. Ayes 4, nays 0. ( * #15) LEASE — PURCHASE — RESOLUTION #3048 It was moved by Butler, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to adopt Resolution ##3048, approving the lease — purchase agreement for the new City facilities. Ayes 4, nays 0. 14 ,M MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING i NOVEMBER W 0@1 ( *##16) LICENSES It was moved by Butler, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to approve the following licenses: On —Sale Liquor — Jimmies Lounge Off —Sale Liquor. — Navarre Liquors, Inc. Club Liquor — Woodhill Country Club Off —Sale Non — intoxicating Malt Liquor — Navarre Lanes On —Sale non — intoxicating Malt Liquor — Don Scherven Off —Sale Non — intoxicating Malt Liquor — O'Sullivans' On —Sale Non — intoxicating Malt Liquor — Lakeview Golf Course Ayes 4, nays 0. (*#17) BILLS It was moved by Butler, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to approve payment of the All Funds. Account. Ayes 4, nays 0. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to adjourn the regular meeting of the Council at 9:30 p.m. Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor ATLT: Dorothy(F1.'Hallin, City Clerk 15