Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-22-1993 Council MinutesMINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING • HELD NOVEMBER 22, 1993 ROLL The Council met on the above date with the following members present: Mayor Edward Callahan, Councilmembers J. Diann Goetten, Charles Kelley, JoEllen Hun and Gabriel Jabbour. The following represented staff: City Administrator Ron Moorse, Building & Zoning Administrator Jeanne Mabusth, Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator Michael Gaffron, City Attorney Kevin Staunton, Public Works Director John Gerhardson, City Engineer Glenn Cook and Recorder Lin Vee. Mayor Callahan called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. ( * #1) CONSENT AGENDA Goetten requested that Items #3, #6, #7 and #16 be added to the Consent Agenda. Hurr asked that Item #12 be removed from the Consent Agenda. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to approve the Consent Agenda as amended. Ayes 5, nays 0. ( * #2) APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to approve the Minutes of the November 8, • 1993 City Council Meeting as submitted. Ayes 5, nays 0. Mayor Callahan noted there were two letters of commendation for the Public Works Department: 1. A letter from Dr. and Mrs. Alexander Vongries commending Jim Gregory and Greg Palmer for their work at his property on 4051. Highwood Road. 2. A letter from Mitzi Overland of the Early Childhood Family Education Program thanking Scott Oberaigner and Randy O'Brien for their participation in the Early Childhood Family Education Super Saturday Vehicle Fair. PARK COMMISSION COMMENTS There were no representatives present. PLANNING COMMISSION CONMIENTS - Stephen Peterson, Representative. There were no Planning Commission comments. PUBLIC CON01ENTS There were no public comments. • 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 22, 1993 • POLICE CHIEF REPORT The Police Chief was not present. ( * #3) #1842 TOM AND SHEILA BROWNE, 760 SOUTH BROWN ROAD - REQUEST TO MODIFY APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to approve the amended plans for the current building permit application for Tom and Sheila Browne, 760 South Brown Road. Ayes 5, nays 0. ( #4) #1860 ZELMA McKINNEY, 3599 LIVINGSTON AVENUE - CONTINUATION OF REVIEW OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION Mayor Callahan explained that Council was to consider whether a driveway should be accessed off of Blaine Avenue or Livingston Avenue. He added that all Councilmembers should have received a letter from the neighbors' attorney expressing the view that the City is not required to grant a conditional use permit. Callahan had asked City Attorney Staunton to review the letter from the Lommen Nelson law firm. City Attorney Staunton reaffirmed his opinion that the City must grant a conditional use permit in this case and the City does not have the ability to add an owner occupied status as a condition of the conditional use. • Callahan stated there were two concerns remaining: 1. Has the property been used according to the Code? 2. Parking issues. Mabusth explained the two parking options: 1. Access from Livingston Avenue with the existing drive to be realigned. Hardcover will be an issue in this option with the addition of two parking stalls. City Engineer Cook commented on drainage in the area stating it would be hard to calculate the overall effect of this small additional amount of hardcover. However, anything done in the area will impact the watershed. 2. Creation of a new curb cut off of Blaine Avenue. The 15' street setback would allow parking at 15'. Backing out onto Blaine Avenue would result. Additional land alterations would be required according to the City Engineer. City Engineer Cook added that a "daylight area" would need to be created to the north and that clear visibility would have to be maintained involving the neighbor to the south. He stated this access could be made safe but there would be significant impact on the property. 2 S MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING • HELD NOVEMBER 22, 1993 ( #4) #1860 ZELMA McKINNEY, 3599 LIVINGSTON AVENUE - CONT. In response to the question of the use of the property in the past, Mabusth advised there were missing receipts from approximately July 1967 - January 1969. Gayle Siegler explained that during this time period her father had been undergoing heart surgeries. She felt she could substantiate that the property had always been a rental property. Karen Cuff, 3570 Livingston Avenue, stated that she had calculated the hardcover. according to the survey submitted and noted a total of 23.3 %. Adding either driveway would exceed the 30% allowed. She also stated that she had obtained information on the Uniform Building Code and Fire Codes in effect at the time of construction and noted that if a home was built as a duplex, a sound barrier between levels would have been required as well as smoke detectors (fire alarms), some lighting requirements, interior door specifications, etc. She asked that Council consider the impact the excess hardcover would have in the area. Greg Goodfellow, 3585 Livingston Avenue, noted that runoff is a problem in this neighborhood and it does not have to be a 100 -year rain. He also commented that in 1978 the McKinney's applied for a building permit which added additional bulk to the building. The statute stated that there was to be no increase or bulk added to the building as of January 1, 1975. However, the City allowed this to happen. He expressed his wish that the Council consider the letter received • from their attorney. Goodfellow also noted that in January of 1983, Pat Molene who rented the third apartment at 3585 Livingston Avenue, filed a complaint with the City of Orono asking why this property could be used as triplex. The Code states a non - conforming use cannot be changed to another non - conforming use. Goodfellow felt a triplex would be considerably different than a duplex. Callahan noted that this application was for a duplex not a triplex. Mabusth confirmed that the application was for the continuation of a non - conforming use, in this case a duplex. Jabbour asked if a reduction in density would constitute abandonment of the conditional use. City Attorney Staunton replied that if there had been three units, moving to two units would not be considered abandonment. Jabbour thought the Council should consider if there was an intent for the property to be used as a duplex throughout its history. Kelley did not want to vote on this issue until there was proof of the use of the property during the missing 18 months of receipts. Hurr asked if a conditional use permit was conditioned upon the owner staying there, would it lapse upon the owner's departure? MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 22, 1993 • ( #4) #1860 ZELMA WKINNEY, 3599 LIVINGSTON AVENUE - CONT. City Attorney Staunton responded that in this conditional use permit, the duplex use would remain regardless of ownership. He noted that the use must remain the same as that prior to the change in Zoning Code. If the Council determines the use has been continuous, the conditional use permit is a mechanism for registering with the City the duplex use of this property. Hurr asked if there was any time frame for a property to be brought into compliance with City codes. City Attorney Staunton confirmed there was nothing in the code. The only way the conditional use permit would lapse is if there was a significant change such as the building being destroyed, the use abandoned or significant change in the non - conforming nature of the use. Mabusth added that now the application for a building permit for multiple units in a single family zoning district would trigger the application for a conditional use permit. Hurr asked if this were being assessed as two units. Mabusth noted the applicant was receiving a percentage of the homestead credit because of the rental unit. Siegler thought Hennepin County was listing the property as a multiple use but Orono lists as single family. Jabbour noted the idea of willful abandonment should be considered. Mike Swanson, 3596 Lyric Avenue, stated that if the driveway were constructed off of Blaine • in back of his property, it would impact his property and cause a problem when he puts up a garage. He has concern over the sale of the property if Mrs. McKinney no longer lives there. An absentee owner could be much different. Elizabeth Goodfellow, 3585 Livingston Avenue, stated there were several issues that were unclarified. 1. Can the City lawfully issue a conditional use permit? 2. Parking - The City's ordinances require additional parking in order for this property to be used as a duplex. She felt there was not a reasonable answer to the parking problem, therefore the conditional use permit should not be granted. None of the neighbors want the parking expanded. She asked how the Council could justify granting a conditional use permit when the parking needs were not satisfied. Harvey Reder, 3598 Livingston Avenue, asked if the Council would consider three parking spaces instead of four as he had suggested at a previous meeting. 4 • MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING • HELD NOVEMBER 22, 1993 ( #4) #1860 ZELMA WKINNEY, 3599 LIVINGSTON AVENUE - CONT. Hurr asked for clarification of the parking requirement. Mabusth stated the garage stalls could be counted as well as other designated parking spaces. Mabusth noted this property is not within 1000' of the shoreline, and if it were it would be allowed 35 % hardcover, so hardcover is not an issue. Lot coverage could be an issue but there is not any structure being added. Goetten asked about triggers that may have been in place for a conditional use permit in 1968. Mabusth confirmed there is more zoning review done today than in the past. Kelley asked if Goetten thought the interruption in rental in the late 1960's may not have an effect because the code changed in 1975. City Attorney Staunton explained that since the property was used as a duplex before the zoning code made it non - conforming, it could continue as duplex use. Mabusth added the code changed in 1962 so the use would have had to have been in existence in 1962 and continued through to present. City Attorney Staunton continued that according to the code in 1978, expansion of the bulk of the building would not have been allowed if a conditional use permit was in place. The City should probably not have allowed this expansion, • but it did. This still does not affect the use of the property. City Attorney Staunton explained the concepts of abandonment and discontinuance. Abandonment requires the intent to no longer use the property in the designated way as well as the discontinuance of the use. The Code talks about discontinuance for over 12 months. There is a presumption that if there is a discontinuance for longer than 12 months, there is intent to abandon the use unless there is evidence of no intent to abandon. If they were unable to rent the property for a time, that would not constitute abandonment. Hurr asked about the utilities. Mabusth confirmed they have two gas meters and one water meter. Sewer was installed in the early 1960's. Hun questioned if there should be two sewer assessments. Mabusth replied that staff has recommended that Council look at requiring the payment of another SAC and sewer assessment. Hurr questioned if the non - conforming use changed from two to three to two rental units if this wouldn't indicate a change of use. City Attorney Staunton confirmed the two - family use would not have changed even though there may have been an increase. The change would have to be to another use such as retail to qualify as a change in use. Hurr questioned if the code was clear on whether a change in density would constitute a change in use. Staunton responded that the code only states a "change in use". is 5 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 22, 1993 • ( #4) #1860 ZELMA WKINNEY, 3599 LIVINGSTON AVENUE - CONT. Hun agreed with Kelley that further documentation would be needed to prove continued duplex use before she could make a decision. Mayor Callahan noted that since most of the receipts exist, it is assumed the missing receipts also exist. He felt it questionable that there was a willful abandonment. Jabbour asked the City Attorney what liability the City has in issuing the building permit in 1978. Staunton thought it would be difficult to make the owners rebuild the house as it was in 1978. Mayor Callahan asked if the building currently meets the fire codes for a duplex. Mabusth responded that there is no housing code in Orono for rental properties. The Building Inspector did make an inspection of the property and there are some recommendations for corrections of recent improvements. Jabbour felt it obvious the property has been used as a duplex and it would be the City's job to prove the owners willingly abandoned the duplex use. He added that he sees the City's only choice to grant the conditional use permit based on the recent discussions. He also did not think parking should impact the neighbors and would be agreeable to three parking spaces. Hun asked about a previous memo that brought up concerns about the regulation of storage of boats, etc. on the property and if there could be conditions to regulate this in the conditional use permit. Staunton explained that regulations on the storage of boats, etc.. would be pursuant to the code regardless of whether there is a conditional use permit granted. He stated that this property cannot be treated any differently than any other in the same zoning district because of the conditional use permit. Hurr felt that additional conditions could be put on a property if it has a conditional use permit. Jabbour suggested that if a parking variance were granted, additional conditions could be added to the variance regarding boat storage, etc. This would help to control the water runoff and hardcover in the area. A motion was made by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to grant a conditional use permit for duplex use and a variance to the requirement for four parking stalls because of the City ;s intention to reduce water runoff in this part of the City. A condition of the variance resolution will be that no additional exterior parking, i.e. RVs, boats, campers, tractors, trailers, snowmobiles, etc., will be allowed on the property. Ayes 4, nays 1. Hurr opposed the motion. Hurr asked that the resolution include the payment of SAC and sewer assessment. • 2 NE UTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING . HELD NOVEMBER 229 1993 ( * #5) #1882 JOHN M. O'SULLIVAN /O'SULLIVANS, 2420 SHADYWOOD ROAD - AMENDED CONEUERCIAL SITE PLAN - RESOLUTION NO. 3359 It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to grant approval of the revised commercial site plan fire lane requirements per conditions of Resolution No. 3359 for John O'Sullivan, 2420 Shadywood Road. Ayes 5, nays 0. ( * #6) #1886 ROBERT L. MELAMED, 1000 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD SOUTH - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION NO. 3360 It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to grant a conditional use permit to allow the filling of approximately 1,800 cubic yards at 1000 Old Crystal Bay Road South for Robert L. Melamed per Resolution No. 3360. Ayes 5, nays 0. ( *#7) #1887 ROBERT L. MELAMED, 1000 OLD CRYSTAL BAY ROAD SOUTH - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - RESOLUTION NO. 3361 It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to grant a conditional use permit to permit a guest house at 1000 Old Crystal Bay Road South for Robert L. Melamed per Resolution No. 3361. Ayes 5, nays 0. • ( #8) PAUL AND VeNITA SCHNEBELE, 835 FOREST ARMS LANE - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION NO. 3362 Mabusth explained the applicants are seeking approval of an average lakeshore setback variance for a family room addition. The applicants have advised that they are in the process of making landscape improvements involving the removal of plastic underliners. The excesses of hardcover within the 250 -500' setback area will be removed. Overall hardcover is at 15 %. Jabbour suggested that the density that is added in the 250 -500' setback area be subtracted from the 75 -250' zone and included in the resolution. Mabusth noted that with the removal of plastic in the 250 -500' setback area, this brings hardcover down to 24% where they would be allowed 30 %. In this case, it is not appropriate to include in the resolution but Jabbour felt for the future there should be a policy that if hardcover is over in one area, it should be subtracted in another so the total will never exceed the maximum hardcover allowed. Goetten asked to have hardcover in the 0 -75' setback area noted in the resolution for permanent record. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Kelley, to approve Resolution No. 3362 granting a variance to permit the construction of an addition to the west and lakeside of the existing residence to be placed 20' in front of the average lakeshore setback line for Paul and VeNita • Schnebele, 835 Forest Arms Lane. Ayes 5, nays 0. 7 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 22, 1993 • (#9) FRONT/BACK LOT REQUIREMENTS - ORDINANCE Gaffron felt some additional changes would make the ordinance more user friendly. Mayor Callahan suggested that Gaffron check with the Planning Commission Chair to see if he thought the changes suggested were significant enough to be reviewed by the Planning Commission. If not, bring back to Council for approval in the revised form. A motion was made by Hurr, seconded by Jabbour, to table adoption of the ordinance amending the Municipal Zoning Code and Subdivision Code by defining standards for the creation and use of lots which do not abut a public or private road. Ayes 5, nays 0. MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT 1) Hurr asked to discuss the memo regarding Police Lieutenant Salary Negotiations. She was opposed to the merit pay concept because no other employees are involved with this and does not want the City Administrator to proceed as proposed. City Administrator Moorse commented that currently the lieutenants have a 5 % merit pay amount that is not based on performance. Moorse is suggesting making this performance based. Some Council members felt merit pay should then be done for all employees. • Moorse thought they could move in this direction, but not all at one time. Mayor Callahan thought the City Administrator should negotiate the contract with the lieutenants and the Council could then either give other employees an equal share or reject the contract. Hun stated she was giving direction as to what she considered acceptable. 2) Hurr asked about travel expenses related to the Finance Director picking up materials from LOGIS, the City's data processing vendor. City Administrator Moorse explained this is cheaper than using another service or having another employee drive to Logis for pick -ups. Jabbour suggested Moorse check with some delivery services to get cost comparisons. An educated comparison can then be made. Goetten agreed. 3) Kelley reported that he met with the Long Lake Fire Commission and spoke about the relief association as well as some other matters and felt all was going well. The Fire Commission did ask if they are getting the 2% commission from the State after the district lines were redrawn in the Fox Street area. The cities will get further information on this. 8 40 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING • HELD NOVEMBER 22, 1993 MAYOR/COUNCII. REPORT 4) Jabbour expressed his appreciation to the Planning Commission for their professional handling of the zoning applications. 5) Jabbour also reported that payment for the new facilities is almost complete and project costs have come within $1,000 of the budget. One cold storage building was eliminated to stay within the budget. 6) Goetten expressed her concern for the sun problem in the administrative office and inquired about the status of the order for shades. Moorse explained that the original order was lost by the vendor during a move to a new office location. The blinds were reordered approximately six weeks ago and should be in fairly soon. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT ( #10) TAX FORFEIT PROPERTIES - RESOLUTION NO. 3363 Hurr asked about the access over Highview Road and if it was a fully improved road access. • Mabusth explained access was via a small alleyway that is undeveloped. She added it will not be an easy property to develop but is very beautiful. A motion was made by Hurr, seconded by Goetten, to approve the sale of the tax forfeit property and retention by the City of the other piece. Kelley asked if the City had "first rights" to the property if they wanted to buy it. Jabbour noted the City would have to have a purpose for it. The County contacts the City in case the City would condemn it for road development, sewer, etc. Gerhardson confirmed the property could be retained for park purposes. Kelley thought the City should consider keeping the property rather than "giving it away". Gerhardson stated a buildable property such as this is usually sold. Mabusth explained that there were 10 potential buildable lots on this larger piece of property. Kelley asked again why the City did not attempt to purchase this piece if they can get it for the market value of $41,500. Councilmembers agreed that further information should be obtained about the possibility of acquiring this land. Hurr withdrew her previous motion. Kelley made a motion, Goetten seconded, to table consideration of the tax forfeited land, P.I.D. 07- 117 -23 23 0001, until further review can be done. Ayes 5, nays 0. 0 1 1 9 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 22, 1993 • ( #10) TAX FORFEIT PROPERTIES - RESOLUTION NO. 3363 - CONT. Hurr noted there is a 90 day time limit with approximately 60 days left to respond to the County. A motion was made by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to approve Resolution No. 3363 requesting conveyance of tax forfeit lands, P. I. D. 36- 118 -23 11 0002, for the purpose of public road and utility. Ayes 5, nays 0. ( * #11) DAVID NELSON, CSO, RESIGNATION It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to accept the resignation of David Nelson, effective November 9, 1993. Ayes 5, nays 0. ( #12) DELINQUENT UTILITY ACCOUNTS - RESOLUTION NO. 3364 Hurr inquired how some of these delinquents have gotten over $1,000 if they are done each year. City Administrator Moorse responded he would check into this further. A motion was made by Callahan, seconded by Jabbour, to adopt Resolution No. 3364 providing for the collection of delinquent charges for 1993 sewer and water utility services and annual is septic inspection and recycling program fees. Ayes 5, nays 0. ( * #13) LEVY SEWER CONNECTION FEE - RESOLUTION NO. 3365 It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution No. 3365, A Resolution to Approve Connection to Municipal Sewer of the Property Located at 1940 Shoreline Drive. Ayes 5, nays 0. ( * #14) RESOLUTION TO CALL 1980 BONDS - RESOLUTION NO. 3366 Mayor Callahan asked if the City were going to refinance the 1989 bonds if it would be cheaper to do it all at one time. City Administrator Moorse explained these bonds will not be refinanced but paid off. A motion was made by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to adopt Resolution No. 3366 calling for the redemption of the general obligation bonds of 1980. Ayes 5, nays 0. 10 • MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING . HELD NOVEMBER 22, 1993 ( #15) INSURANCE AGENT OF RECORD Hurr asked if these charges were typical and if the City went out for bids. City Administrator Moorse replied that bids were obtained when this agent was hired and bids will be done again during the next year. He felt this agreement was comparable to other cities and probably lower than other cities similar to Orono. It was moved by Hurr, seconded by Jabbour, to appoint Mr. Duweyn Carlson, Apple Valley Agency, as Insurance Agent of Record for 1994, at a fee not to exceed $7,650.00, including commissions earned on policy premiums paid by the City. Ayes 5, nays 0. ( * #16) APPOINTMENT OF AUDIT FIRM Hurr noted that it costs the City $2,000+ a year to obtain the financial award. City Administrator Moorse explained that when the City first started the process to get this award, there was a lot of work to do but now it is maintenance. Hun thought the award may not be necessary every year since there is a cost of $2,250 annually for the certificate program. Goetten explained that she worked hard at getting this program in place because she felt this was a way for Orono to show financial stability. City Administrator Moorse stated that part of the program is to follow good financial procedures and this meets standards set by the State and National Organization of Financial Officers. Moorse explained that the costs related to the award are not a payment for the award, but rather are for assistance in keeping up with new accounting standards related to both good financial practices and the receipt of the award. Hurr asked if the City could meet those standards without paying the costs each year. Kelley thought the standards would change yearly and would be good to keep up with them as they are updated. It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to appoint the audit firm of Malloy, Karnowski, Radosevich & Co. to perform the required audits for the 1993 fiscal year at an estimated cost of $15,700 plus direct expenses and to assist with the Certificate of Achievement in Financial Reporting program at a cost not to exceed $1,500. Ayes 5, nays 0. • 11 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 22, 1993 • ( #17) INFORMATION ON MEDIATION MEETING (ORAL REPORT) City Administrator Moorse reported that the Highway 12 Mediation Meeting identified the characteristics of a good solution including: 1. Survival of the two communities in their current status. 2. Responding to the safety concerns of the current highway. 3. Whatever is built should be an economically sound investment. 4. Compatibility with regional transportation system. 5. Environmentally sensitive. 6. Solution should expedite a decision on the location. 7. Survival of Maple Plain. Traffic capacity needs were discussed and whether other roadways could be considered to help with the traffic flow. Further study needs to be done in this area. Some action steps discussed were: 1. To re- examine the traffic projections. 2. To consider the extent to which other roads can be used. 3. To consider segregating types of traffic on specific roadways. Some suggestions were made for focusing on the issues. If the two cities and MnDot agree on a the type and location of a road that would be acceptable, then study could continue for capacity, safety, and environmental needs. Another suggestion is to look at the characteristics of a good solution and try to agree on a solution before proceeding with the analysis of the traffic needs. Mayor Callahan agreed with the points discussed. He was the only other Orono representative present at the meeting. He did not think having 5 representatives was necessary or useful but only 1 representative may not be enough. Jabbour wants to be sure that only one representative at the meeting would not be interpreted as non - interest. He suggested a mutual agreement with Long Lake as to the number of representatives that would be appropriate at each meeting. Other Councilmembers agreed with this suggestion. Goetten and Kelley had both talked with Long Lake representatives who also agree with this approach. Mayor Callahan stated there was also a recent Highway 12 Policy Committee meeting. The economists that have been considered to do the Economic Impact Study had second thoughts about the study being useful to Orono. They agreed they would redo the traffic projections and look at them in a "screenline process" which means they would look at traffic levels at several "boundary" locations between Willmar and Minneapolis. 12 • MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING • HELD NOVEMBER 22, 1993 ( * #18) LICENSES It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to approve the following licenses: Residential Kennel Licenses: Wayne E. & Gayle D. Carrier, 1376 North Arm Drive Home Occupation License: Balance Consulting Group, 2597 Lydiard Circle Septic System Installer License: Duane Ritter Exc., 7120 Vernon Street, Rockford Off Sale Liquor: Navarre Liquors, 3421 Shoreline Drive On Sale Liquor: Jimmies Lounge, 3380 Shoreline Drive Club Liquor: Woodhill Country Club, 200 Woodhill Road Wayzata Country Club, 200 Wayzata Boulevard Non - Intoxicating Liquor Off Sale: Orono Shopping Center, 2160 Wayzata Boulevard O'Sullivan's, 2420 Shadywood Road • Non - Intoxicating Liquor On Sale: Orono Golf Course, 265 Orono Orchard Road South Ayes 5, nays 0. ( * #19) BILLS It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, to approve payment of the All Funds Account. Ayes 5, Nays 0. Public Works Director John Gerhardson had two additional items to discuss: 1. Costs of underground tank removal. The original amount of $1950 was without any contaminated soils. Since there was some contamination, the amount has increased to $3506 because of additional testing and lab work. The amount of actual tank disposal remains at $1800. Further testing because of contamination is estimated at $7195. • 13 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING - HELD NOVEMBER 22, 1993 • DISCUSSION BY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR - CONT. 2. Hennepin County is administering the Stubbs Bay Block Grant Program. The connection bids have been much higher than anticipated. The Minnesota Housing Finance Agency may have additional monies available to Orono residents. The County would like to submit an application for additional funds on behalf of the City by December 6, 1993. These funds are very similar to the conditions of the Block Grant Program. A motion was made by Mayor Callahan, seconded by Jabbour, for conceptual approval to proceed with the application for Minnesota Housing Finance Agency monies by December 6, 1993. Ayes 5, nays 0. ADJOURNMENT It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Callahan, to adjourn at 9:23 p.m. Ayes 5, nays 0. Edward J. Call 711, Jr. Mayor • 14 0