Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Wetland Delineation Report - 2017
LEVEL 2 WETLAND DELINEATION June • , 2017 3635 Togo ' • ProjectWayzata, MN ISG • 17-20520 REPORT FOR: FROM: Ralph Kempf Lucas Mueller York Realty Environmental Scientist 3675 Togo Road ISG Wayzata, MN, 55391 7900 International Drive, 612.382.8230 Suite 550 ralphkempf99@gmail.com Minneapolis, MN, 55425 952.426.0699 Lucas.mueller@is-grp.com ENVIRONMENTAL TABLE OF CONTENTS ExecutiveSummary ................................................................................................................. 2 ProjectDescription................................................................................................................... 2 Definitions + Methodology ........................................................................................................ 3 Findings.................................................................................................................................. 6 Recommendations.................................................................................................................... 9 Data Sources + Literature Cited................................................................................................10 TABLES Table 1. Delineated Wetland Summary ....................................................................................... 2 Table 2. Vegetation Indicator Status Delineated Wetland Summary................................................ 4 APPENDICES + FIGURES Appendix A: Figure 1. Project Location....................................................................................... A Figure 2. DNR Public Waters Inventory and National Wetlands Inventory Figure 3. Soil Survey of Hennepin County Figure 4. LiDAR Elevations & Hillshade Figure 5. Aerial Photograph Appendix B: Figure 6. Wetland Delineation Map.......................................................................... B Wetland Delineation Data Forms Appendix C: Antecedent Precipitation Data................................................................................. C Photo Log Appendix D: Joint Application Form for Activities Affecting Water Resources in Minnesota ................ D Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Application 3635 Togo Road- Wetland Delineation Report Page i ISG Project No. 17-20520 Certification 3635 TOGO RD — WAYZATA, MN LEVEL 2 WETLAND DELINEATION ISG PROJECT NO. 17-20520 I hereby certify the above-described routine on-site Level 2 wetland delineation was performed on May 19, 2017. The wetland delineation meets standards and criteria specified in the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Midwest Region. Lucas Mueller Environmental Scientist I hereby certify the quality assurance review of this wetland delineation report was completed by me or under my direct supervision, and that I am a Certified Wetland Delineator in the State of Minnesota. Travis Fristed, PWS (#2360), MN WDC (#1169) Senior Environmental Scientist/Environmental Services Group Manager 3635 Togo Road, Wayzata MN- Wetland Delineation Page 1 ISG Project No. 17-20520 Executive Summary ISG completed a wetland investigation at 3635 Togo Road Wayzata, MN on May 19, 2017 (as shown on the attached Figures). The project area consisted of a 2.40 acre parcel (053-1711723340014) located south of Togo Road and West of C.R. 19 in Wayzata, MN. One wetland was delineated in the project area and is further described in this report. This wetland investigation was performed in accordance with the 1987 US Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual and the 2010 Midwest Regional Supplement, and all applicable supporting documents for areas meeting wetland criteria for a routine wetland delineation in accordance to the MN Wetland Conservation Act and the US Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 Program. Vegetation, soil and hydrology sampling have been completed on all potential wetland areas within the project area. Wetland determinations were based on the three required technical criteria: occurrence of hydric soil, predominance of hydrophytic vegetation, and the presence of one primary and/or two secondary indicators of wetland hydrology. Potential wetland areas (mapped hydric soils, NWI signatures, and low depressional areas) were investigated on-site and delineated as upland. Table 1. Delineated Wetland Summary Dominant Dominant MappedWetiand Wetland Type(s) Community i Delineated Soil . No. Cowardin Wetland Classification NWI Waters ICirc. 391 Eggers& Reed Area (Hydric Rating) Inventory Floodplain L36A/L24A 0.68 Acres Type PFOA,PEMC Forest, Fresh (Predominantly A (29 654 Sq. PEM1A No 1,2,6 PSSC (wet) Meadow, Ft) Hydric and Shrub/Carr Hydric) Project Description PROJECT PURPOSE ISG was retained to identify and delineate all wetland areas that exist within the project boundaries. The wetland investigation boundary is approximately 2.5 acres and consists of one residential home. The purpose of the wetland investigation is to accurately identify wetland areas onsite so that they can be incorporated into plans for future development of the property. This report is intended to facilitate any regulatory discussions of Wetland Conservation Act and Clean Water Act Section 10/404 permitting for this project. 3635 Togo Road, Wayzata MN- Wetland Delineation Page 2 ISG Project No. 17-20520 PROJECT LOCATION The project area is located north of Northern Ave and south of Togo Road in Section 17, T117N, R23W, in the city of Wayzata, Minnesota (See Figure 1, Appendix A for a location map). The site is located within the Upper Mississippi River basin, the Mississippi River (twin cities) sub-basin (07010206), and the Minnehaha Creek watershed. The site elevation ranges from approximately 950' above msl at a very small portion on the southeast corner of the project area to 934' above msl in the lowland area centered within the project area. SURROUNDING PROPERTIES The project site is located in a generally suburban area of Wayzata, MN. Most of the surrounding residences consist of wooded or partially wooded lots. Shadywood Road is the main transportation route and is located 25 feet east of the project area. Lake Minnetonka (Crystal Bay) is located approximately 600 feet east of the project area. The investigation area is adjacent to Togo Road on the north and Northern Ave to the south. Definitions + Methodology This investigation was performed in accordance with the US Army Corps of Engineers 1987 Wetland Delineation Manual and the 2010 Midwest Regional Supplement, and all applicable supporting documents for areas meeting wetland criteria for a routine wetland delineation in accordance to the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act and the US Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 Program. The following definitions, diagnostic environmental characteristics, and the methodology used is based on the mandatory technical criteria for the identification and delineation of wetlands. WETLANDS DEFINITION As defined in 33 CFR Part 328, Section 3, the term wetlands is defined as: Those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. The frequency and duration of saturation may vary by geographical region, and is largely dependent upon climatic conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas. Wetlands have the following general diagnostic environmental characteristics: Hydrophytic Vegetation The wetland vegetation criterion is satisfied when the prevalent vegetation consists of plant species adapted to inundation or substrates periodically deficient in oxygen as a result of 3635 Togo Road, Wayzata MN- Wetland Delineation Page 3 ISG Project No. 17-20520 prolonged saturation. Specifically, this includes plant communities that under normal circumstances have more than 50% of the composition of the dominant species from all strata ranked with an indicator status as obligate wetland (OBL), facultative wetland (FACW), and/or facultative (FAC) species. The indicator status for individual plants as defined by the updated 2016 Minnesota National Wetland Plant List are identified and described in the following table: Table 2. Vegetation Indicator Categories Indicator -.. Occurrence Obligate (OBL) Almost always Facultative Wetland (FACW) Usually Facultative (FAC) Equally likely to occur in uplands Facultative Upland (FACU) Rarely Upland (UPL) Almost never Hydric Soil A hydric soil is a soil formed under conditions of saturation, flooding, or ponding long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part. Examples of hydric soil indicators include: the accumulation of organic matter, low-chroma soil matrices, gleying, redox concentrations, redox depletions, and hydrogen sulfide odor. Wetland Hydrology According to the 1987 manual, wetland hydrology is present when the area is inundated either permanently or periodically at mean water depths less than or equal to 6.6 feet, or the soil is saturated to the surface at some time during the growing season. The Midwest Regional Supplement requires fourteen (14) or more consecutive days of flooding or ponding, or a water table of twelve (12) inches (30 cm) or less below the soil surface, during the growing season at a minimum frequency of five (5) years in ten (10) (50% or higher probability) to satisfy wetland hydrology. The wetland hydrology criterion can be satisfied with observation of one (1) primary hydrology indicator or two (2) secondary hydrology indicators. Potential primary indicators of wetland hydrology may include, but are not limited to: inundation, saturation, water marks, drift lines, sediment deposits, and a thin muck surface. Potential secondary indicators of wetland hydrology may include, but are not limited to: surface soil cracks, drainage patters, saturation visible on aerial imagery, and the FAC-neutral test. 3635 Togo Road, Wayzata MN- Wetland Delineation Page 4 ISG Project No. 17-20520 OFF-SITE METHODOLOGY Map Review Prior to fieldwork, several mapping sources were consulted to identify potential wetland habitats. The sources consulted include the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetland Inventory (NWI), United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), formerly Soil Conservation Service (SCS) Soil Survey, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Public Waters Inventory (PWI), and United States Geological Survey (USGS) Topographic maps. Areas indicating evidence of potential wetland conditions were evaluated in greater detail through fieldwork. Precipitation Data Analysis Precipitation data from the Minnesota Climatology Working Group and Natural Resources Conservation Service WETS Tables were used in conjunction with the NRCS Method for Evaluating Antecedent Moisture Conditions to determine precipitation conditions under which the investigation was conducted. ON-SITE METHODOLOGY Field Sampling Procedures Sample transects were established in representative transition zones between wetland and upland for each observed plant community. For potential wetland areas greater than five acres in size, a minimum of three transects were established along the baseline wetland boundary for lengths of up to one mile, three to five transects for one to two miles, five to eight transects for two to four miles, and eight or more transects for wetland baseline boundaries that exceed four miles in length. Transect intervals do not exceed 0.5 mile apart for each other. Transects are comprised of two sample points, one sample in upland and one sample point in wetland. A field data sheet was completed describing the dominant soil characteristics (to a minimum of 24 inches below the soil surface), plant communities, and hydrology indicators at the sample point. The presence of water was observed after time (depending on soil characteristics) was allowed for movement of water through the soil substrate. Absolute percent areal cover was recorded for the species that were observed (which may exceed 100% total area due to overlap) and dominance was determined by using the 50/20 rule. Vegetation was sampled within each stratum present at a sample point using the following circular plot sizes: • Trees - 30 ft radius • Saplings and Shrubs - 15 ft radius 3635 Togo Road, Wayzata MN- Wetland Delineation Page 5 ISG Project No. 17-20520 • Herbaceous - 5 ft radius • Woody Vines - 30 ft radius The sample points were marked with 4-foot lathe, photographed, and flagged with surveyor's tape (if not within an agricultural land use). Other samples were taken at unmarked locations to provide verification of the wetland edge, as needed. Wetland Boundary Delineation The wetland boundaries were determined using changes in topography, dominance of hydrophytic/non-hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soil indicators, and/or hydrology characteristics. Wetland edges were marked with pink "wetland delineation" flags. The wetland edge is considered to be the highest extent of the wetland basin. Areas below the flagged edge satisfy the three required wetland criteria while areas above were lacking in one or more of these criteria. US Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Guidance Letter 90-6 requires documentation sufficient to allow a reasonably accurate replication of the delineation at a future date. Reasonably accurate is defined as within 0-2 meters accuracy. Precise positions of sample points and the wetland edge have been located by a sub-meter GPS unit and have been included in the wetland delineation drawing or map for this property. Wetland Type Classification Wetlands were classified using Wetland Plants and Plant Communities of Minnesota and Wisconsin (Eggers & Reed 2007), Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin, et al, 1979) and Wetlands of the United States (Fish and Wildlife Service Circular 39, Shaw and Fredine 1971). Findings MAP REVIEW The NWI map lists one NWI signature in the middle of the investigation area. The basin is listed as a Palustrine Emergent Persistent Temporarily Flooded wetland (PEM1A). The NWI basin extends to the west outside the project area. The surrounding NWI basins are shown in Figure 2, Appendix A. Soils within the investigation boundary have been mapped by the NRCS along with their hydric classification. The location of each soil unit occurring within the investigation boundary is shown on the Hennepin County Soil Survey map (Figure 3, Appendix A). 3635 Togo Road, Wayzata MN- Wetland Delineation Page 6 ISG Project No. 17-20520 0 No DNR Public Water watercourses are located within the investigation area, or within the surrounding area of the site. Two DNR Public Waters are located north of the project area. One of the basins is unnamed, and the other is Crystal Bay of Lake Minnetonka (27013310) (Figure 2, Appendix A). The LiDAR map (Figure 4, Appendix B) illustrates the highest elevations in the southeast corner of the site. Elevations vary within the project boundary, ranging from 952 feet above msl to 934 feet above msl near the middle of the investigation area. ANTECEDENT PRECIPITATION DATA ANALYSIS The precipitation received in the project area during the previous three months was within the normal range (30-70th percentile) for this area. Prior to the sample date of May 19, 2017 there was normal precipitation in February, March, and April. Therefore the field work was completed under normal conditions according to the precipitation worksheet for wetland delineations (Appendix Q. Precipitation in the weeks leading up the wetland delineation field work was much higher than normal. These rain events caused excess inundation of areas that may be dry most of the growing season. These rain events should be noted when reviewing this report and attached appendices. FIELD DELINEATION RESULTS Based on the data reviewed and fieldwork conducted, one (1) area was examined for wetland characteristics within the project area. One (1) wetland was ultimately delineated and further described within this report. The delineated wetland is identified as Wetland A, which include sample points 1-3. Field data forms for each sample point are located in Appendix B. Refer to Figure 6 (Appendix B) for a map of the project boundary, wetland basins, sampling transects, and area. Photos of the wetland basin within the project boundary are included in Appendix C. OTHER AQUATIC RESOURCES There are no prominent aquatic resources adjacent to the project boundaries (Figure 2, Appendix A). Lake Minnetonka surrounds the project area 0.15 miles north, 0.40 miles south, and 0.41 miles to the west. Wetland A appears to extend off-site to the west. A ditch feature located along the west side of the basin enters Wetland A from the north from an offsite residence. WETLAND SUMMARY Wetland A Wetland A is a Type 1/2/6 wetland complex located in the middle of the project area. The wetland extends east to west, and continues off-site to the west of the project boundary. The complex is 3635 Togo Road, Wayzata MN- Wetland Delineation Page 7 ISG Project No. 17-20520 made up of three wetland types. Type 1 (PFOA) is located along the south edge of the wetland and contained all three wetland indicators. The Type 1 floodplain forest was dominated by silver maple and green ash. A Type 2 (PEMC) fresh (wet) meadow surrounded most of the wetland edge, except to the south where the Type 1 was present. This portion of the wetland was dominated by reed canary grass and lakebank sedge, with a few cattails present near the middle of the wetland. Near the west side of the wetland complex was a Type 6 (PSSC) shrub/carr wetland dominated by willows and red osier dogwood. A majority of the wetland basin was inundated, most likely caused by the recent heavy rain events. Most of the water seemed to exist along the south edge of the wetland near the floodplain forest. Topography and changes in vegetation were ultimately used to determine the wetland boundary. Sample points 1-2 were taken along the north wetland edge to define the boundary from the upland wooded area. Sample point 3 was taken along the south edge in the floodplain forest to verify that hydric soils were present to go along with the hyrdophytic vegetation and hydrology. Surrounding the wetland basin was a forested upland area sloping into the wetland. Residences and manicured lawns also existed adjacent to the wetland, and all appeared to drain into Wetland A. 3635 Togo Road, Wayzata MN- Wetland Delineation Page 8 ISG Project No. 17-20520 Recommendations Activities impacting or potentially impacting the wetlands identified are regulated through several levels of government in Minnesota: • Federal: US Army Corps of Engineers: Permit Programs under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act • Federal: USDA NRCS: Wetland Conservation Provisions of the 1996 Farm Bill • State of Minnesota: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources: Public Waters Work Permit Program • Local: Local Units of Government (LGU) administer the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) of 1991. Please note that grading, excavating, or filling is not allowed until all necessary permits have been obtained. If wetland impacts are proposed, ISG can assist in the proper steps to acquire the appropriate permit or exemption. By initiating the permit process as soon as possible, potential costly delays to the project may be avoided. 3635 Togo Road, Wayzata MN- Wetland Delineation Page 9 ISG Project No. 17-20520 Data Sources + Literature Cited Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and R.T. LA Roe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deep water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, FWS/OBS-79/31. Eggers, S.D., and Reed, D.M. 1997. Wetland Plants and Plant Communities of Minnesota and Wisconsin. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District. 1997. Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Wetlands Research Program Technical Report Y-87-1, US Army Engineers Waterways Experiment Station. Environmental Laboratory. August 2010. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Midwest Region. ERDC/EL TR-10-16. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Lichvar, R.W., D.L. Banks, W.N. Kirchner, and N.C. Melvin. 2016. The National Wet/and Plant List: 2016 Wetland Ratings. Phytoneuron 2016-30: 1-17 Minnesota Climatology Working Group. State Climatology Office - DNR Waters, Extension Climatology Office - MES and Academic Climatology - U of Minnesota. htti)://climate.umn.edu/wetland/ Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Protected Waters Inventory Map, Hennepin County. Shaw, S.P., and C.G. Fredine. 1956. Wetlands of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Circular 39. 67pp. State of Minnesota Interagency Cooperative Agreement for Implementation of the Federal Wetland Delineation Memorandum of Agreement. Minnesota Wetland Mapping Conventions for 1985 Food Security Act (FSA) as Amended and Section 404 Clean Water Act (CWA), August 1994. United States Army Corps of Engineers- St. Paul District and Minnesota Board of Water & Soil Resources. March 4, 2015. Guidance for Submittal of Delineation Reports to the St. Paul District Army Corps of Engineers and Wetland Conservation Act Local Governmental Units in Minnesota. United States Department of Agriculture. Natural Resources Conservation Service. Climate Analysis for Wetlands. http://www.wcc.nres.usda.gov/ftpref/support/climate/wetlands/ United States Department of Agriculture. Natural Resources Conservation Service. Web Soil Survey. http://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/app/ United States Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory Map. May 2015 Update (April 30, 2015 metadata), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources United States Geological Survey. 7.5 minute, 1:24,000 scale Topographic Quadrangle Map. 3635 Togo Road, Wayzata MN- Wetland Delineation Page 10 ISG Project No. 17-20520 APPENDIX A : Figure 1 . Project Location Figure 2 . DNR Public Waters Inventory and National Wetland Inventory 3635 Togo Road, Wayzata MN- Wetland Delineation Report Appendix A ISG Figure 3 . Soil Survey of Hennepin County Figure 4 . LiDAR Elevations and Hillshade Figure 5 . Aerial Photograph Project No. 20520 t0 _ Bay Ilk T117N f Togo Rd � R23W Hennepin 12 county 001 4a NO Ave Crystal PI a a i { IJ c v A m > i Livin Ston Ave 12 Hennes �,, Cod ;. Wayzata IF ' :111 I t 1 w T 1 7N`' _ V t ,V a T1'1 212 PN:17.20520 Source(s): Figure 1 Municipalities(MN DOT,6/24/2016) 0 2,000 4,000 1,0111 Project Location Map Lakes(MN DNR,Jul,2006 Feel Y ) 1 inch=8,000 feet Counties(MN DNR,July 2013) 3635 Togo Road PLSS(MnGeo/USGS) Thursday,May 18,201 Wayzata, Hennepin County, Minnesota Le�rcnd i � - 0 Project Area — USGS Streams DNR Public Waters Inventory DNR Public Watercourses National Wetlands Inventory Q Freshwater Emergent Wetland Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetland aE ®Freshwater Pond ► t i� L__Lake RiverineAk 7 } _ n r 'i Togo VT r 4. , # ti [ F / �', ter,. 1. �' .� '�� ` I T r._♦ r; 4 k , 1. A.A t ti ;a I I s ' �a I�•• ,� '.gyp7 �.. - �" ��r �. � # Ain J a. 1_t rt Livingston Ave... do u aJAE $ 1 A Y ; PN:17-20520 Figure 2 Source(s): Orthophoto(USDA,NAIP,2015) 0 37,1 75 111 DNR Public Waters Inventory Feet NWI(MN DNR,2010,2011) 1 inch=150 feet National Wetlands Inventory PWI(MN DNR,2008) 3635 Togo Road Friday,June 09,2017 Wayzata,Hennepin County,Minnesota § � Y. Legend :; '> . i i S • Q Project Area Hennepin County Soil Survey Hydric Soil ° ° ° 4` _ Predominantly Hydric Soil s Ofl�n ° ',y ham Partially Hydric Soil Predominantly Non-Hydric Soil • `` 'f Qua Non Hydric Soil V, � OL s Hydric RatingPercent H ric ' 1Hydric 100 p r Predominately Hydric, t 67%and<100% r y, Partial dric 2:33%and<67% Predominate) Non- dric <_1%and<33% Not Fiydric 0% - e i k , 7 * 4.y %t Northern Ave • v a o o0 rt r o t � r r5i " r .� n Lig.,ta ff. �` 1 4 S:1zP 1 r� •s 4 •♦t�_ y PN:17.20520 Figure 3 Source(s): Orthophoto(USDA,NAIP,2015) et Hennepin County Soil Survey Sol Survey(USDA NRCS,2014) 1 Inch=100 feet 3635 Togo Road Friday,June 16,2017 Wayzata, Hennepin County, Minnesota i Lc�end ,y Project Area Contour 2' Contour I s oda Togo Rd �oo°.� a d i if i ,F : Northern Ave A ro (��� Crystal PI PN:17.20520 Figure 4 source(s): 2ftC0rd0urs(2011) °e LiDAR Elevations and Hillshade 1 Meter Hillshade(2011) 1 inch=100 feet 3635 Togo Road Friday,June 09,2017 Wayzata, Hennepin County, Minnesota Legend 1 y O Project Area `, ,� y� 1 1.* t 1 4 Togo Rd °po h 1 Imo"_ ,•�, - t �x �r � f r* x Northern Ave -f Crystal PI for r� PN:17.20520 Figure 5 $ource(s): orthophoto(USDA,NAIP,2015) zs so ioFee Aerial Photo 1 Inch=100 feet 3635 Togo Road Wednesday,May 17,2017 Wayzata, Hennepin County, Minnesota APPENDIX Figure 6 . Wetland Delineation Map Wetland Determination Data Forms 3635 Togo Road, Wayzata MN- Wetland Delineation Report Appendix B ISG Project No. 20520 Leuend QProjectArea �, ( 'ti ►� , L�°° Wetland Delineation • Wetland Flag Photo Location 10'Contour Togo Rd 2'Contour Sample Point Upland i I j�►' k i.. .. -. Wetland Wetland Type , .�?':J� ;� - it Type 1-Floodplain forest T'C' yrt Type 2-Fresh(wet)MeadowIlk Type 6-Shrub-carr „� g. t r - _ .'Fi �t- - �, '.+a y v. � .. .. .. . t 4 a 1 3 � F R • Nthern Aveor �. d'�" fri+iil Table 3.Delineated Wetland Size and Type,3635To o Road,Wayzata,MN 7A Wetland T arD Wetland ID Wetland Area Circ.39 Cowardin Class. E ers&Reed " Floodplain Forest,Fresh(wet)Meadow, A 0.68 Ac.(29,654 S.F.) Type 1/2/6 PFOA,PEMC,PSSC • Shrub/Carr PN:17.20520 Figure 6 Source(s): ° 5 3° 6° Wetland Delineation Map Orthopholo(USDA,NAIP,2015) OFeet Wetland Delineation(ISG,2017) 1 inch=75 feet 3635 Togo Road Monday,May 22,2017 Wayzata, Hennepin, Minnesota WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Midwest Region Project/Site: 3635 Togo Roas City/County: Hennepin Sampling Date: 5-19-17 Applicant/Owner: Ralph Kempf State: MN Sampling Point: SP-1-Up Investigator(s):Lucas Mueller Section,Township,Range: S17/T117/R23 Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): Hillside Local relief(concave,convex,none):Convex Slope(%): 2 Lat: 44.938266 Long: 93.615323 Datum: NAD 83 Soil Map Unit Name: L24A-Hydric NWI classification: None Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes No X Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Remarks: Forested edge before drop into wetland basin.Numerous rain events were recorded leading up the the delineation that were not refelcetd on the antecedent precipitation table.Site was under above normal precip conditions. VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: 1. Ulmus americana 15 Yes FACW Number of Dominant Species That 2. Acer negundo 10 Yes FAC Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 4 (A) 3 Total Number of Dominant Species 4. Across All Strata: 5 (B) 5 Percent of Dominant Species That 25 =Total Cover Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 80.0% (A/B) Saolina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ) 1. Rhamnus cathartica 60 Yes FAC Prevalence Index worksheet: 2. Fraxinus pennsylvanica 5 No FACW Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 3. OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 4. FACW species 25 x 2= 50 5. FAC species 85 x 3= 255 65 =Total Cover FACU species 20 x 4= 80 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ) UPL species 0 x 5= 0 1. Acer negundo 15 Yes FAC Column Totals: 130 (A) 385 (B) 2. Glechoma hederacea 20 Yes FACU Prevalence Index =B/A= 2.96 3. Impatiens capensis 5 No FACW 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 5. _1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 6. X 2-Dominance Test is>50% 7. —3-Prevalence Index is 53.0' 8. 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting 9, data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 10. _Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) 40 =Total Cover 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) be present,unless disturbed or problematic. 1' Hydrophytic 2• Vegetation =Total Cover Present? Yes X No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 60%of area was bare soil. I I US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region–Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: SP-1-Up Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks 0-10 10YR 2/2 100 Loamy/Clayey 10-18 10YR 4/2 95 10YR 4/6 5 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations 18-24 10YR 4/1 85 10YR 4/6 15 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations 'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3.. _Histosol(Al) —Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _Coast Prairie Redox(A16) _Histic Epipedon(A2) _Sandy Redox(S5) _Iron-Manganese Masses(F12) —Black Histic(A3) —Stripped Matrix(S6) —Red Parent Material(F21) —Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _Dark Surface(S7) —Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22) —Stratified Layers(A5) —Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) —Other(Explain in Remarks) —2 cm Muck(A10) _Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) X Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) X Depleted Matrix(F3) _Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) wetland hydrology must be present, 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) Redox Depressions(F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Remarks: This data form is revised from Midwest Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils,Version 7.0,2015 Errata.(hftp://www.nres.usda.gov/lntemet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nres142p2_O5l293.docx) HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(minimum of two reauired) —Surface Water(Al) —Water-Stained Leaves(139) _Surface Soil Cracks(136) _High Water Table(A2) —Aquatic Fauna(1313) _Drainage Patterns(1310) —Saturation(A3) _True Aquatic Plants(614) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2) —Water Marks(131) _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) _Crayfish Burrows(C8) —Sediment Deposits(132) _Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) _Drift Deposits(133) —Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) —Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) —Algal Mat or Crust(134) —Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) _Geomorphic Position(D2) —Iron Deposits(65) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) X FAC-Neutral Test(135) —Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) —Gauge or Well Data(D9) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138) Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: Hydrology sampled to 24".FAC neutral met. US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region–Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Midwest Region Project/Site: 3635 Togo Roas City/County: Hennepin Sampling Date: 5-19-17 Applicant/Owner: Ralph Kempf State: MN Sampling Point: SP-2-Wet Investigator(s):Lucas Mueller Section,Township,Range: S17/T117/R23 Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): Toe Slope Local relief(concave,convex,none):Concave Slope(%): 0 Lat: 44.938209 Long: 93.615327 Datum: NAD 83 Soil Map Unit Name: L24A-Hydric NWI classification: PEMC Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Remarks: Numerous rain events were recorded leading up the the delineation that were not refelcetd on the antecedent precipitation table.Site was under above normal precip conditions. VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: 1. Ulmus americana 15 Yes FACW Number of Dominant Species That 2. Acer negundo 20 Yes FAC Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 5 (A) 3• Total Number of Dominant Species 4. Across All Strata: 5 (B) 5 Percent of Dominant Species That 35 =Total Cover Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100.0% (A/B) Saolina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ) 1. Rhamnus cathartica 20 Yes FAC Prevalence Index worksheet: 2. Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 3. OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 4. FACW species 90 x 2= 180 5. FAC species 50 x 3= 150 20 =Total Cover FACU species 5 x 4= 20 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ) UPL species 0 x 5= 0 1. Poe palustris 15 No FACW Column Totals: 145 (A) 350 (B) 2. Glechoma hederacea 5 No FACU Prevalence Index =B/A= 2.41 3. Impatiens capensis 30 Yes FACW 4. Phalaris arundinacea 30 Yes FACW Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 5. Acer negundo 10 No FAC _1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 6. X 2-Dominance Test is>50% 7. X 3-Prevalence Index is s3.0' 8. 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting 9, data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 10. —Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) 90 =Total Cover 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) be present,unless disturbed or problematic. 1' Hydrophytic 2• Vegetation =Total Cover Present? Yes X No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 10%of area was bare soil. US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region–Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: SP-2-Wet Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type Loc2 Texture Remarks 0-12 10YR 2/1 100 Mucky Loam/Clay 12-24 10YR 4/1 90 10YR 5/6 5 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations 10YR 5/1 5 D M 'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils3: _Histosol(Al) —Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _Coast Prairie Redox(A16) _Histic Epipedon(A2) —Sandy Redox(S5) _Iron-Manganese Masses(F12) —Black Histic(A3) _Stripped Matrix(S6) —Red Parent Material(F21) _Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) —Dark Surface(S7) —Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22) _Stratified Layers(A5) X Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) _Other(Explain in Remarks) _2 cm Muck(A10) —Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) X Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) —Depleted Matrix(F3) X Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _Redox Dark Surface(F6) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Depleted Dark Surface(177) wetland hydrology must be present, 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) Redox Depressions(F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Remarks: This data form is revised from Midwest Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils,Version 7.0,2015 Errata.(http://www.nres.usda.gov/lntemet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nres142p2_O5l293.docx) HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required:check all that aooly) Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required) —Surface Water(Al) —Water-Stained Leaves(69) _Surface Soil Cracks(136) X High Water Table(A2) _Aquatic Fauna(613) —Drainage Patterns(1310) X Saturation(A3) _True Aquatic Plants(1314) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2) —Water Marks(131) _Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) _Crayfish Burrows(C8) _Sediment Deposits(132) _Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) _Drift Deposits(133) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) _Algal Mat or Crust(134) _Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) X Geomorphic Position(D2) —Iron Deposits(135) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5) —Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) _Gauge or Well Data(D9) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(138) Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 12 Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 3 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: Hydrology sampled to 24".. US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region–Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Midwest Region Project/Site: 3635 Togo Roas City/County: Hennepin Sampling Date: 5-19-17 Applicant/Owner: Ralph Kempf State: MN Sampling Point: SP-3-Wet Investigator(s):Lucas Mueller Section,Township,Range: S17/T117/R23 Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): Toe Slope Local relief(concave,convex,none):Concave Slope(%): 0 Lat: 44.938879 Long: 93.615184 Datum: NAD 83 Soil Map Unit Name: L36A-Predominantly Hydric NWI classification: PFOA Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No within a Wetland? Yes X No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No Remarks: Sample point taken in PFOA of wetland complex.Numerous rain events were recorded leading up the the delineation that were not refelcetd on the antecedent precipitation table.Site was under above normal precip conditions. VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet: 1. Ulmus americana 20 Yes FACW Number of Dominant Species That 2. Acer saccharinum 60 Yes FACW Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 6 (A) 3 Total Number of Dominant Species 4. Across All Strata: 6 (B) 5 Percent of Dominant Species That 80 =Total Cover Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100.0% (A/B) Saolina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15 ) 1. Rhamnus cathartica 20 Yes FAC Prevalence Index worksheet: 2. Acer negundo 25 Yes FAC Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 3. OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 4. FACW species 105 x 2= 210 5. FAC species 45 x 3= 135 45 =Total Cover FACU species 0 x 4= 0 Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5 ) UPL species 0 x 5= 0 1. Poa palustris 15 Yes FACW Column Totals: 150 (A) 345 (B) 2. Impatiens capensis 10 Yes FACW Prevalence Index =B/A= 2.30 3. 4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 5. _1 -Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 6. X 2-Dominance Test is>50% 7. X 3-Prevalence Index is 53.01 8• 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting 9• data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 10. —Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) 25 =Total Cover 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30 ) be present,unless disturbed or problematic. 1' Hydrophytic 2• Vegetation =Total Cover Present? Yes X No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) 75%of herb area was bare soil. US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region–Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: SP-3-Wet Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks 04 10YR 3/1 90 10YR 5/6 5 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations 4-16 10YR 4/2 70 10YR 5/6 15 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations 10YR 5/1 15 D M 16-24 10YR 4/1 90 10YR 2/1 10 MS M Loamy/Clayey 'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soil33: _Histosol(Al) —Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) ? Coast Prairie Redox(A16) _Histic Epipedon(A2) —Sandy Redox(S5) _Iron-Manganese Masses(1712) —Black Histic(A3) —Stripped Matrix(S6) —Red Parent Material(F21) _Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) —Dark Surface(S7) —Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22) _Stratified Layers(A5) —Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) —Other(Explain in Remarks) _2 cm Muck(A10) —Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) X Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) X Depleted Matrix(F3) _Thick Dark Surface(Al2) X Redox Dark Surface(F6) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Depleted Dark Surface(F7) wetland hydrology must be present, 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) Redox Depressions(F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No Remarks: This data form is revised from Midwest Regional Supplement Version 2.0 to include the NRCS Field Indicators of Hydric Soils,Version 7.0,2015 Errata.(http://www.nres.usda.gov/lntemet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nresl42p2_051293.docx) HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one is reauired:check all that aooly) Secondary Indicators(minimum of two reouired) X Surface Water(Al) X Water-Stained Leaves(139) —Surface Soil Cracks(66) —High Water Table(A2) _Aquatic Fauna(613) —Drainage Patterns(610) —Saturation(A3) —True Aquatic Plants(B14) _Dry-Season Water Table(C2) —Water Marks(61) —Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) —Crayfish Burrows(C8) _Sediment Deposits(132) _Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(0) _Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) _Drift Deposits(133) _Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) —Stunted or Stressed Plants(131) _Algal Mat or Crust(64) —Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) X Geomorphic Position(D2) _Iron Deposits(135) _Thin Muck Surface(C7) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5) —Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(137) —Gauge or Well Data(139) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(68) Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 1 Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available: Remarks: Hydrology sampled to 24". US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region–Version 2.0 APPENDIX C : Antecedent Data Photo • • 3635 Togo Road, Wayzata MN- Wetland Delineation Report Appendix C ISG Project No. 20520 3635 Togo Road Wetland Delineation Antecedent Precipitation Data Worksheet Date: 5/18/2016 Location: Wayzata, Hennepin County LONG TERM PRECIP CONDITIONS 3 YRS IN 10 3 YRS IN 10 CONDITIONCONDITION • • •DOF MONTHLESS THAN MORETHAN VALUE • TWO NORMAL • 1st Month Prior April* 2.14 2.52 2.89 2.86 Normal 2 3 6 2nd Month Prior March* 1.08 1.56 2.03 0.56 Normal 2 2 4 3rd Month Prior February* 0.42 0.64 0.86 0.72 Normal 2 1 2 Precipitation Data Source: http://climate.umn.edu/gridded_data/precip/wetland/wetland.asp SUM = 12 *Preliminary Climate Data from Twin Cities station (http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/climate/historicalllcd.html?loc=msp) Condition Value: Dry = 1 Normal = 2 Wet = 3 Note - If sum is: 6 - 9 = Dry 10 - 14 = Normal 15 - 18 = Wet Wetland Delineation Report Appendix C ISG Project No. 17-20520 Photo • • May ` 2017 Photo 1-Located on south side of wetland facing north showing open wetland basin area and inundation. t� Photo - • • 1, facing 3635 Togo Road Wetland Delineation Report Appendix C-1 ISG Project No. 17-20520 Photo • g May • 2017 -dr ♦ r Photo 3- Standing on east edge of property facing west. Showing length ow } d i I Wetland A and Type 2 wetland. z, Photo 4- Standing on north side of wetland facing north. Showing transect fi 1. r a rTktia4 . .y. yPf � � _ r '• points for • A. 3635 Togo Road Wetland Delineation Report Appendix C-2 ISG Project N• 17-20520 APPENDIX � : Joint Application Form for Activities Affecting Water Resources in Minnesota Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Application Form ISG Project N• 20520 Project Name and/or Number: 3635 Togo Road PART ONE: Applicant Information If applicant is an entity(company,government entity,partnership,etc.),an authorized contact person must be identified. If the applicant is using an agent(consultant,lawyer,or other third party)and has authorized them to act on their behalf,the agent's contact information must also be provided. Applicant/Landowner Name: Mary Schommer Mailing Address: 3635 Togo Road,Wayzata, MN 55391 Phone: 952-463-7516 1 E-mail Address: Tigerlily2246@aol.com Authorized Contact(do not complete If same as above): Ralph Kempf Mailing Address: 3675 Togo Road,Wayzata,MN 55391 j Phone: 612-382-8230 E-mail Address: Ralphkempf99@gmail.com Agent Name: Lucas Mueller Mailing Address: 7900 International Dr.Suite 550 Minneapolis,MN 55425 Phone: 952-426-0699 E-mail Address: Lucas.mueller@is-grp.com I PART TWO: Site Location Information County: Hennepin City/Townshlp: Wayzata Parcel ID and/or Address: 3635 Togo Road Legal Description(Section,Township,Range): S17/T117N/R23W Lat/Long(decimal degrees): 44.938061/93.614994 Attach a map showing the location of the site in relation to local streets,roads,highways. Approximate size of site(acres)or N a linear project,length(feet): 2.5 ac. If you know that your proposal will require an individual Permit from the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers,you must provide the names and addresses of all property owners adjacent to the project site. This information may be provided by attaching a list to your application or by using block 25 of the Application for Department of the Army permit which can be obtained at: 1 httD:/Iwww.mvp.usace.army.mil/PortaI 7/docs/regulatory/Regulatq!yDocs/engform 4345 2012oct adf i PART THREE: General Project/Site Information iif this application is related to a delineation approval,exemption determination,jurisdictional determination,or other correspondence submitted prior to this application then describe that here and provide the Corps of Engineers project number. Describe the project that is being proposed,the project purpose and need,and schedule for implementation and completion.p on.The project description must fully describe the nature and scope of the proposed activity including a description of all project elements that effect aquatic resources(wetland,lake,tributary,etc.)and must also include plans and cross section or profile drawings showing the location,character,and dimensions of all proposed activities and aquatic resource impacts. J Please see attached wetland delineation report for project details. 1 I I Project Name and/or Number: 3635 Togo Road PART FOUR: Aquatic Resource Impacts Summary If your proposed project involves a direct or indirect impact to an aquatic resource (wetland, lake, tributary, etc.) identify each impact in the table below.Include all anticipated impacts,including those expected to be temporary.Attach an overhead view map, aerial photo,and/or drawing showing all of the aquatic resources in the project area and the location(s)of the proposed impacts. i Label each aquatic resource on the map with a reference number or letter and identify the impacts in the following table. Aquatic Type of Impact Duration of County,Major Aquatic Resource q (fill,excavate, Impact Overall Size of Existing Plant Resource Type Community Watershed overhead #, ID rnoted on drain,or Permanent(P) Size of lmpact2 Aquatic and Bank head view) (wetland,lake, remove or Temporary Resource 3 Type(s)in tributary etc.) vegetation) (T)1 Impact Area° Service Area# of Impact Area 1 I 'if impacts are temporary;enter the dui " � P rY, duration of the impacts in days next to the"T . For example,a project with a temporary access fill that iwould be removed after 220 days would be entered"T(220)". =Impacts less than 0.01 acre should be reported in square feet. Impacts 0.01 acre or greater should be reported as acres and rounded to the nearest 0.01 acre. Tributary impacts must be reported in linear feet of impact and an area of impact by indicating first the linear feet of impact along the flowline of the stream followed by the area impact in parentheses). For example,a project that impacts50 feet of a stream that is 6 feet wide would be reported as 50 ft 300 Po ( square feet). Mis is generally only applicable if you are applying for a de minimis exemption under MN Rules 8420.0420 Subp.8,otherwise enter"N/A". 'Use Wetland Plants and Plant Community Types of Minnesota and Wisconsin 3nd Ed.as modified in MN Rules 8420.0405 Subp.2. sRefer to Major Watershed and Bank Service Area maps in MN Rules 8420.0522 Subp.7. If any of the above identified impacts have already occurred,identify which impacts they are and the circumstances associated with each: i PART FIVE: Applicant Signature ❑ Check here if you are requesting a pre-aoolication consultation with the Corps and LGU based on the information you have provided. Regulatory entities will not initiate a formal application review if this box is checked. B signature below,Y g nature o ,I attest that the information in this application is complete and accurate. I further attest that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein. i I Signature: Z 7 Date: �— I hereby authorize to act on my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to fumish,upon request, supplemental information in support of this application. 'The term"impaL`t"as used in this joint application form is aeneric term used g for disclosure purposes to identify activities that may require approval from one or more regulatory agencies. For purposes of this form it is not meant to Indicate whether or not those activities may require mitigation/replacement. I� Project Name and/or Number: 3635 Togo Road Attachment A Request for Delineation Review, Wetland Type Determination, or Jurisdictional Determination i By submission of the enclosed wetland delineation report,I am requesting that the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers,St.Paul District (Corps)and/or the Wetland Conservation Act local Government Unit(LGU)provide me with the following(check all that apply): ®Wetland Type Confirmation Delineation Concurrence. Concurrence with a delineation is a written notification from the Corps and a decision from the LGU concurring,not concurring,or commenting on the boundaries of the aquatic resources delineated on the property.Delineation concurrences are generally valid for five years unless site conditions change.Under this request alone,the Corps will not address f the jurisdictional status of the aquatic resources on the property,only the boundaries of the resources within the review area (including wetlands,tributaries,lakes,etc.). I ❑Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination.A preliminary jurisdictional determination(PID)is a non-binding written indication from the Corps that waters,including wetlands,identified on a parcel may be waters of the United States.For purposes of computation of impacts and compensatory mitigation requirements,a permit decision made on the basis of a PID will treat all i j waters and wetlands in the review area as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. PLDs are advisory in nature and may not be appealed. ❑Approved Jurisdictional Determination.An approved jurisdictional determination(AJD)is an official Corps determination that jurisdictional waters of the United States are either present or absent on the property.AJDs can generally be relied upon by the affected party for five years.An AJD may be appealed through the Corps administrative appeal process. In order for the Corps and LGU to process your request,the wetland delineation must be prepared in accordance with the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual,any approved Regional Supplements to the 1987 Manual,and the Guidelines for Submitting Wetland Delineations in Minnesota(2013). http://www.myp.usace.army.millMissions/Regulatory/DelineationJDGuidance asax I I I l WATER RESOURCE PERMIT APPLICATION FORM Use this form to notify/apply to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District(MCWD)of a proposed project or work which may fall within their jurisdiction.Fill out this form completely and submit with your site plan,maps,etc.to the MCWD at: 15320 Minnetonka Blvd.Minnetonka,MN 55345. Keep a copy for your records. YOU MUST OBTAIN ALL REQUIRED AUTHORIZATIONS BEFORE BEGINNING WORK. 1. Name of each property owner: Mary Schommer Mailing Address: 3635 Togo Road City: Wayzata State: MN Email Address: tigertily2246@aol.com Zip: 55391 Phone:�2-463x516 Fes: 2. Property Owner Representative Information(not required) (licensed contractor, architect, engineer, etc...) Business Name: ISG Representative Name: Lucas Mueller Business Address: 7900 International Drive, Suite 550 City: Bloomington State: MN Zip: 55425 Email Address: lucas.mueller@>is-grp.com Phone: 952-426-0699 Fax: 3. Project Address: 3635 Togo Road City: Wayzata State: MN Zip: 55391 Qtr Section(s): Section(s): 17 Township(s): 117N Range(s): 23W Lot: Block: Subdivision: PID: 4. Size of project parcel (square feet or acres): 2.4 Acres Area of disturbance(square feet): N/A Volume of excavation/fill(cubic yards):N/A Area of existing impervious surface: N/A Area of proposed impervious surface: N/A Length of shoreline affected (feet): N/A Waterbody(&bay if applicable): N/A 5. Type of permit being applied for(Check all that apply): ❑ EROSION CONTROL ❑ WATERBODY CROSSINGS/STRUCTURES ❑ FLOODPLAIN ALTERATION ❑ STORMWATER MANAGEMENT S WETLAND PROTECTION ❑ APPROPRIATIONS O DREDGING ❑ ILLICIT DISCHARGE ❑ SHORELINE/STREAMBANK STABILIZATION 6. Project purpose(Check all that apply): ❑ SINGLE FAMILY HOME ❑ MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL(apartments) ❑ ROAD CONSTRUCTION ❑ COMMERCIAL or INSTITUTIONAL ❑ UTILITIES ❑ SUBDIVISIONS (include number of lots) ❑ DREDGING ❑ LANDSCAPING(pools,berms,etc.) ❑ SHORELINE/STREAMBANK STABILIZATION © OTHER(DESCRIBE): -7. NPDES/SDS General Stormwater Permit Number(if applicable): N/A 8. Waterbody receiving runoff from site: N/A 9. Project Timeline: Start Date: N/A Completion Date: N/A Permits have been applied for: City ❑County 0 MN Pollution Control Agency 13 DNR 13 COE Cl Permits have been received: City=County—n MN Pollution Control Agencyn DNR—M COE—M By signing below,I hereby request a permit to authorize the activities described herein. I certify that I am familiar with MCWD Rules and that the proposed activity will be conducted in compliance with these Rules. I am familiar with the information contained in this application and,to the best of my knowledge and belief,all information is true,complete and accurate. I understand that proceeding with work before all required authorizations are obtained may be subject to federal,state and/or local administrative,civil and/or criminal penalties. 7L-4e4- Ce —2/ — /7 Signature of h Property Owner Date