Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 6966 II 11111 11 1 1 11 1 Il II Doc No T05609685 Certified, filed and/or recorded on Apr 29, 2019 3:18 PM Office of the Registrar of Titles Hennepin County, Minnesota Martin McCormick, Registrar of Titles Mark Chapin, County Auditor and Treasurer Deputy 102 Pkg ID 1815298E Document Recording Fee $46.00 Document Total $46.00 Existing Certs 1478083 This cover sheet is now a permanent part of the recorded document. CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 6 9 6 6 `gkESHOQ`0 A RESOLUTION APPROVING VARIANCE FROM MUNICIPAL ZONING CODE SECTIONS 78-330; 78-1279; AND 78-1680 FILE NO. LA19-000007 WHEREAS, on February 18, 2019, Donald Haberman and Heidi Haberman, a married couple (hereinafter the "Applicants"), applied for a variance from the City Code for the property addressed 2799 Pheasant Road and legally described as: Lot 12, Pheasant Lawn,Hennepin County,Minnesota(hereinafterthe"Property"); WHEREAS, the Applicants have made application to the City of Orono for a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-330 to allow redevelopment of a lot of record 0.7 acre in area and having 123 feet in width at the ordinary high water level (OHWL) and 111 feet in width at the 75-foot setback where 1.0 acre in area and 140 feet in width are required; and WHEREAS, the Applicants have made application to the City of Orono for a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1279 to allow construction of the home with a larger building envelope 24 feet lakeward of the average lakeshore setback; and 61.2 feet from the OWHL where a 75-foot setback is required; and WHEREAS, the Applicants have made application to the City of Orono for a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1680 to allow 945 square feet of hardcover within the 75-foot setback where no hardcover is permitted; and WHEREAS, on March 18, 2019, after published and mailed notice in accordance with Minnesota Statutes and the City Code, the Planning Commission held a public hearing, at which time all persons desiring to be heard concerning this application were given the opportunity to speak thereon; and WHEREAS, on March 18,2019,the Planning Commission recommended approval of the variances conditioned upon reduction of the portion of new lakeside patio within the 75-foot setback; and WHEREAS, on March 20, 2019 asquested by the Planning Commission, the Applicants provided a revised plan reflecting a 173 square foot reduction of the proposed lakeside patio within the 75-foot setback from 462 square feet to 289 square feet; I CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 6966 �gkFSHo�`` WHEREAS, on April 8, 2019,the City Council reviewed the application,the revised plan, the recommendations of the Planning Commission and City staff, and the draft language for an approval resolution which reflected a hardcover increase in the 75-foot setback; and WHEREAS, on April 22,2019,the City Council approved the variance, maintaining the existing square footage of hardcover within the 75-foot setback; and NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota hereby approves the requested variances as described above based on one or more of the following findings of fact concerning the Property: FINDINGS OF FACT: 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #LA19-000007. The analysis contained within staff memos and the exhibits attached to the aforesaid memos, all minutes from the above mentioned meetings, and any and all other materials distributed at these meetings are hereby incorporated by reference. 2. The Property is located in the LR-1 B Zoning District. 3. The Property contains 0.7 acres in area and has a defined lot width of 123 feet at the OWHL and 111 feet at the 75-foot setback. 4. The Property is within Tier 1 and hardcover is limited to 25% according to the Stormwater Quality Overlay District. 5. Applicant has applied for the following variance[s]: a. Lot Area Variance b. Lot Width Variance c. 75-Foot Setback and Hardcover Variances d. Average Lakeshore Setback Variance 6. The subject property includes 701 square feet of hardcover in the 0-75 foot lake yard, excluding retaining walls. 7. The 701 square feet of hardcover includes 388 square feet of building, and 313 square feet of other hardcover. 8. In considering this application for variances, the Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed variances upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic 2 CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 6966 SHo�� conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. ANALYSIS: 1. "Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance . . . ."The proposed variances are in harmony with the purpose of the Ordinance. The lot includes difficulties in its substandard size and width, location of adjacent homes, and the existing home's proximity to the lake. The average lakeshore setback variance will not further impact views of the lake for adjacent properties. 2. "Variances shall only be permitted . . . when the variances are consistent with the comprehensive plan." The proposed variances to develop a nonconforming lot of record are consistent with the comprehensive plan. 3. "Variances may be granted when the applicant for the variance establishes that there are practical difficulties in complying with the zoning ordinance. `Practical difficulties,' as used in connection with the granting of a variance, means that: a. The property owner in question proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner, however, the proposed use is not permitted by the official controls. The request to permit construction of the home on the substandard lot, in the proposed location within the lake and average lakeshore setbacks, appears to be somewhat reasonable as the Applicants are proposing to build within the existing lakeside footprint, the Property's nonconforming size, and the neighboring homes' orientation with respect to the lakeshore, and adjacent properties creates difficulties. The hardcover level, and building encroachments proposed within the lake yard and average lakeshore setback do not exceed existing setbacks and do not appear to be unreasonable. b. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. The nonconforming lot size, the existing home's location with respect to the lake and the neighboring home locations prevent a residential footprint consistent with the neighborhood. The proposed overall hardcover level is conforming. The circumstances are unique to the Property; and c. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality." The variances are requested in order to permit construction of a home designed to fit the character of the neighborhood according to the submitted information. 3 �ONp CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 6966 G `gkFSHo�� 4. "Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties." Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. "Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78."This condition is not applicable. 6. "The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located." This condition is not applicable, as the use for a residential home is an allowed use in the LR-1 B District. 7. "The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling."This condition is not applicable. 8. "The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property." The Property's substandard size and orientation with respect to the lakeshore, and the setback from the lake of the adjacent homes creates difficulties for the Applicants in redeveloping the Property consistent with the homes in their neighborhood. 9. "The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located." The Property's nonconforming size and the relationship between the existing home and the setback of the adjacent properties create difficulties for the Applicants. 10. "The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant." Granting lot area, lot width, hardcover, average lakeshore and lake setback variances are necessary for the preservation of the property right of the Applicants. 11. "The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter." Granting the requested hardcover, lot area, lot width, average lakeshore setback and lake setback variances in this unique situation is not contrary to the intent of the zoning chapter 12. "The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty."The requested variances for lot width, lot area, and setback are necessary, and do not merely serve as a convenience to the Applicants. 4 �ONp CITY OF ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL NO. 6966 G CONCLUSIONS, ORDER AND CONDITIONS: Based upon one or more of the above findings, the Orono City Council hereby grants a variance to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-330 to allow redevelopment of a lot of record 0.7 acre in area and having 123 feet in width at the ordinary high water level (OHWL) and 111 feet in width at the 75-foot setback where 1.0 acre in area and 140 feet in width are required; and Section 78-1279 to allow construction of the home with a larger building envelope 24 feet lakeward of the average lakeshore setback; and 61.2 feet from the OWHL where a 75- foot setback is required; and Section 78-1680 to allow a maximum of 701 square feet of hardcover within the 75-foot setback where no hardcover is permitted in conjunction with redevelopment of the Property; subject to the following conditions: 1. Council approval is based on the entire record, above Findings. 2. The approved project shall conform to the revised, annotated survey dated 03/20/19 and building plans submitted by the Applicants and annotated by City staff, attached to this Resolution as Exhibits A & B. 3. Any amendments to the plans which are not in conformity with City codes may require further Planning Commission and City Council review. 4. Authorities granted by this resolution run with the Property not with the Applicants, but are permissive only and must be exercised by obtaining a building permit for the new construction and commencing construction of said project. A framing inspection must be completed within one year of the date of Council approval, or the variances will expire on that date (April 22, 2020). 5. Violation of or non-compliance with any of the terms and conditions of this resolution may result in the termination of any authority granted herein. ADOPTED by the Orono City Council on this 22nd day of April, 2019. ATTEST: CITY OF ORONO: nna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor 5 LEGAL DESCRIPTION. �\ Pheasant Road _ Lot 12,PHEASANT LAWN.Hennepin Conran,Minnesota. �qr "-929.!Cprtau- — LOT AREA=31,342 SQUARE FEET SCOPE OF WORK&LIMITATIONS: ————— \ -�•=9- - .r. 1. Showing the length And direction of bou danlines of the legal description listed above. The scope of our servicer does not include determirmng what you c—which is a legal mover. Please check the legal description with yorr records or consult with competent legal unue1.if neceamrn.to make sure that it is corral and that any matters of record,swch as comments,that you wish to be included on the *w� survey have been shown. Q y Yes e,• 2. SMwmp the location of observed existing improvwx ements deem surve necessary for the y. 3. seeing survey markers or vevit;'mg exisMgMe markers to esmblish the comers of the property. 4. Stowing el—bons on the she at selected locations to give some indication of the topography of the site.We hn'e also provided a —_---_ benchmark fm vola use m dale rnin ng elevations for construction m1 this site.The elevations shown relate only to the benchmark provided on Nis aunty.Use that benchmark and check at least one other feahm,shown on the survey when determining other clermions for use on this site or tvf beginning construction- 5, This survey las been completed without the benefit of a current title commitment.There may be existing easements or other encumbrances that would be revealed M'a current title commitment.Therefore,Us survey does not purport to show any easements or encumbrances other than the ones sh.—hereon. - '-1 'My,':� . rant n 1 x\ \t t• 6. Note that all building dunermom and bmldmg tie dimensions to the property lines,are taken from the siding and or stucco of the building. �„� �r \�\ �••\ \ 7. While vire show s proposed location for this Mme m addition,vox are not as familiar with vola proposed plans as you,your architect,m the - �4\ \\ .,..11/ `\` rat 11' I \ \\ builder are. R,,i—our proposed location of the improvements and pmposed yard grades carefully to verify dad they match yma plane �} vx , ` 1 1 �\ \ before Bona ruenon begun. Also,we are not m familiar lvnh local codes and mu mmn requirements as the local building and wni ng v\ \ I .sx9 \ \`� t oflicids m this commuruN are. Be sure to show Nis sur—to said officials,m am other officials that may have jurisdiction over the �\ � �`\ Imposed improvements and obtain their approvals before begimmco ng nstnA ion or planning impnwements to the pmF'em' ev 8, While e show the bldldmg setback lines per the City of Orono web site.we suggest you show Nis surrey to the appropriate city officials to be sure that the setback lines are shown conectly Du Nis BEFORE you use this survey to design anything for this site. .�),,l� I i j�i \ a ""� "t'�'�'x y�"•'m STANDARD SYMBOLS&CONVENTIONS : art /;I/ /C• xx \\� - 111 '1��/�(\ Devotes iron smvey marker,set.Imless otherwise noted. I Id 3a _ X aaDmca meaner wnaa acres �`1 X11; I 1 I V 4 \ emat oewrormoN.orae ,� I I I 4aJ \,� � v 4 �dl xr�N dl.mma .��� a� am�,amW ;m,aaamP�m wr��Mmm.immdNl n CL ; n...,®m.u�,xmi.mi m.. �, a se.n.ma axr Wbti<.m. imraenai7.�a stina.r..J x..t� n - am.�..mo._ree mmra,asmaaram an Rn aami�dir,aa rmarwamma,.a Qa is_l G ,am �mna®n.m�br.Y�.me�,�a emmxk...a�iam. aW.a.e m„wrm maa.axa maaw4 � 1 1 � �� _ sir. \t :ms E'stnp p.��v�an.�ar..�m.amnnd,a mw.am m.Bm eao.u.l a.armm� •.�. a / a n.l y •.w Olw//ing mm..0 ., ..rmmr.aa.uaawryraa+our.^..w+a.'i.d m< wwo,v ur..n<,w�a.in�.wvm v.���a•nwr. �j -y_ 41�f - msrama..... .aBw.w.�e.�rd"bi.�van a.m.bi..ix rmn..mmra.m ` T d __mall der,^a,ma mm,a.emm,w.dam 'uc i. 1~ .ItP�.d,um oda®ed..l�mm,com�db�wM m 'T�dwAedd.lua.vsin^arb�.b�wima witlA l,M�.•mx�D,MmmN xryr �.ft mlx.so.d mm...m.�••.mi.ae��w�rx....,ra ,�,naa s..awm.._Iiinlm lw.n,nuw.mMam.a�s.im,rs. � _ \ _G � �\ II(` �.,.. D1= tea,aaaa arm. m mamo mwrvarnox r Vw ¢ aarla..,ammr.am.rrra..wmmn...hu+ean ln+nrorrrs.mad.rr.we.upel.mmmaaarra.md.iNmawmma.m. mawmoi•aan..ar.,o..,.a..wat.ioa..n�..mmnu.ana'm.,.nbr„ua..aw.,..,na a,r> saft see `. arc xr wW Wdes N. / D,ana..n arr�Pmmna s..n win..__-ill mlmv.e<rnts,..a . een ad ar a,ems emaWnd o-.arm.vaammn ar,..ammaa-n �` ara'ro rd am..ia-+x,rs.m„ar, ma-...a.auaemm vin cry aramm mwnm,.amam.am y.ma / _ _PRED _____________ rvaa am. OPCIS A amra.aa�p6mda N,.s ren pmoraawlor.ms.m.a trt.,. !* r1m.sBaena maw.mmr...s a..,na.w,oaewn,a xl.n ar mm.aw e+sex a.aa.m„W.ma.m m,mna annaamavuld ma.q.am roman ws<mtawd..a ram am.m ane m.mman�m aea�a ar.�m�a.,,irlxaia rmn+a n..,. /' ON ELLCNG a„Y .asr�acaaW APm.r ma.ama wxm anr..aN a4 d�ra,.m e,a ra.nwawrxn.miaa ammw A d_ ui Amr,a�m.a„aua�rma. arawam..m x..�e.. a..n..,ane.a,�vawarma.el•a.m.c..n.ah,.m.,a,a.ub.am.e y rsrarur ;rrsrivx c-Z 1 `SA, rrzsrarur'. ffiIPOSEO..E3EVAMUS ^�tl.am.... na.�u.laa.a.ean.amr�.ar..x.9,n ���•ina r, a.a .mammacn.wr....rmn Pwsr ntwR lave-nt'JaR)-tw.3s _ -_ I r ,,,, Tt]a QF Fgn.DA71C+x-932!0 BASElENT FLOOR -8l27D n G QE FLOUR m 931.76 C a — x axis PAYV129ID tmmvw fill, -----'-_-- J - -- - N gam,. v ar— '=_ 6966 ADVANCE SURVEYING & ENGINEERING CO. I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a licensed professional land surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 17kco'lrnate. �Qo o rrt Thomas M. Bloom P.L.S. No. 42379 Step 2: PROPOSED HARDCOVER In the following table identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to Certificate of Survey (survey must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. Key to Survey Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total (Square Feet) (Example) (Garage) (24'x 30') (720) S.F. A House (Outside 75' lake setback) 3,571 S.F. BBituminous Drive (Outside 75' lake setback) 2,980 S.F. C Front Porch/Steps (Outside 75' lake setback) 144 S.F. D Side Conc. Pad/Steps (Outside 75' lake setback) 54 S.F. E Retaining Walls (Outside 75' lake setback) 22 S.F. F Rear Patio(Outside 75' lake setback) 123 S.F. G S.F. H S.F. I S.F. J House (Inside 75' lake setback) 388 S.F. K Stone Steps (Inside 75' lake setback) S.F. L Rear Patio Steps (Inside 75' lake setback) 289 0of S.F. M Ret. Walls (Inside 75' lake setback) 151 S.F. N S.F. O S.F. P S.F. QS.F. R K+L cannot S.F. S exceed 313 S.F. T square feet S.F. V S.F. W S.F. X S.F. y S.F. 1 Total Proposed Hardcover 7,839 S.F. Excludable Hardcover See City Code Sec 78-1684 Retaining Walls 173 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover 173 S.F. (3) Net Proposed Hardcover[Subtract line (2)from line (1)] 7,666 S.F. (4) Total Lot Area 31,342 S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [(3)/(4)] 24.46% NW ONO8O'OVOH iWSV3Hd 66LZ a 3ONdISVA'ab 1NVSd3Hd 66tz Y3HOtfltra•�O y �o�.wgluy ro'TIOd O3nSSl 2 8 a �' i I ■ 6966 ' . o Resol. No. } _ Ex B f'{t yiWd K X K {� Z l9 l9 N C j } o ® o F • O N N H OW !- j N O Q m o = a z z d z O Z N 3 w K d N z O 'O i = € W Z F"Io c � 3 3 z z 3 w } u a a g i g g > w w w o ppppC O S O W O Q N w pC GC LL ? ' w J w W O N z Q nk r lV N g N � OC OC t z ±k � z �ta� a a ' t G z; f` 3, tb � s Y P P P P P 3 c P � sg a a I I I I I I I I I I i I I i L__ I 1 I I 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 I I I 1 I 1 I 1 I I I I � 1 I I I I I � I I � I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I i I I I I � I f I I I I I I I I I _ I t / I I/ y ISSUED FOR: Will—1,,: 'D A-AU�dn 1 1--� 2799 PHEASANT RD.VARIANCE _ s � O 2799 PHEASANT ROAD,ORONO,MN 6 -. w "r=r�� E : E M' €€ € E P P P pP P i 5 "m m '4P, 3 �i \ j I � � I i I I i I I I I i I i i i i i i i i i i i i 6 I I it i I 1i a i i O� r0 Q1- y ISSUED FOR_ R H.r.A. .,,.RgUSCHE0. 3 2799 PHEASANT RD.VARIANCE ' '..d°'T.. a #� �� 2799 PHEASANT ROAD,ORONO,MN M 4' 10 34"1 IIISI]AIVWSIZ M'ONOHOCWMI?JVSV3MOW 3ONVI8VA'db 1NVSV3Hd 66LZ a S31VI:)OSS\I-i -d3Hosn\/-d I tkZ4 L�•fI1VL')Oftpi ••• MAlYNWVl711V1EMA BLgL•E rNt tisHxnvb....e ao}0000plEob �anew i A S ND No ll� II ..._.-- W 0 � I = = 39NVIVVA'41 1NVMHa 66U �.., .o O� �D a 0 IL - - + u i I d _ — i 3 mm- r p X14 S: � 1 P-AUSCHER F,ASSOCiATES EINE NOME DESIGN AND INTERIORS 275 MARKET SAW•$It SOI _ MINNEA60 1•Al.•11105 ._ 617.353.6240•FAX 612.351.5113 �• I �� I y�~��r tiV'ONO2iO QVD211Nh f§k1 fiGCZ --_—____._T_-_— � � 10 11*l,,1ls11]NvWc1z 30MVINVA 'ON 1NVSV3Nd 66LZ m • "Y3°M'x'S' «..p m :jot 0000pflob wam a�enaiy ' CD Z m i-- - C:o X W W Z Z W J O. H W O x Z O H W I.L a �yW � W W O of oc x a E� a � a i sz ? ON z k tp a t 4., ' d '•,.T Rr 'A Pr. k < v 6 t y M 4s� / N i� """an MWaw i { i E t 0 fig& 0*1 � � W W E 8 Q ISSUED FOR: Reridemr for. m--.SLA o g N" 2799 PHEASANT RD.VARIANCEASSOM s 2799 PHEASANT ROAD,ORONO,MN a o �z o c � m � m r, e. m �et,4 v{ 5t y4L E c ' , t r v Y • u, \U,CHCF • __ ��