HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-04-2019 Park Commission PacketAGENDA
City of Orono Park Commission Meeting for Monday, March 4th, 2019, 6:30 PM
Orono Council Chambers, 2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356
952-249-4600 / www.ci.orono.mn.us
Audience Members:
Please sign in for the public record if you wish to address the Park Commission. The sign in sheet is in the lobby.
The Park Commission is an advisory body to the City Council. If action is taken on any items on this agenda, it will be
scheduled for an upcoming City Council meeting.
AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES.
1. January 7th, 2019 Park Commission Meeting Minutes
PUBLIC COMMENT.
CHAIRMAN’S REPORT.
2. Recognition of Departing Commissioners
3.Welcome to New Commissioners
4. 2019 Park Commission Goals Approval
STAFF REPORTS.
5.Big Island Grant Review
6.East Long Lake Grant Review
7.Tree Inventory Grant Update
8. Public Works Parks Update
SPECIAL COMMITTEE REPORTS.
9. Bederwood Sports field
10.East Long Lake Trail
11.Winter Activities
12. Lurton Park
13. Community Events
14.Trails
15.Big Island
16. Golf Course
COMMISSIONERS REPORT.
17. Commissioner’s Updates
ADJOURNMENT.
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO PARK COMMISSION MEETING
Monday, January 7, 2018
6:30 o’clock p.m.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 1 of 9
ROLL CALL
The Orono Park Commission met on the above-mentioned date with the following members present:
Acting Chair Brian Roath, Commissioners Jan Berg, Rick Carter, Bryce Johnson, and Julie Ruegemer.
Representing Staff were Public Works Director/City Engineer Adam Edwards and Recorder Jackie
Young. Mayor Dennis Walsh was present.
Acting Chair Roath called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m., followed by the Pledge of Allegiance.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. NOVEMBER 5, 2018, PARK COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES
Carter moved, Ruegemer seconded, to approve the minutes of the November 5, 2018, Park
Commission meeting as submitted. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
PUBLIC COMMENT
None
CHAIRMAN’S REPORT
2. 2019 PARK COMMISSION GOALS AND SUBCOMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS
Roath suggested the Park commission start with their interests first, which will help form the
subcommittees and then the subcommittees could determine their goals for the year.
Edwards stated one thing to take into consideration as the committees are created is that there are four
seats that are up for reappointment in March, which consists of Rick Meyers, Natalie Williams, Brenda
Johnson, and Jan Berg. Natalie Williams has indicated she does not want to be reappointed and Rick
Meyers and Jan Berg have indicated they would like to stay on the Park Commission.
Two or three applications have been submitted. The applications will go to the City Council the second
meeting in February. The last time the City Council conducted interviews at their work session and then
appointed the candidates at their regular meeting. The new term would then begin the 1st of March.
Carter asked whether Beth Davis is interested in filling one of the spots.
Edwards indicated he has not heard from her at this point. The following is the proposed
subcommittees/working groups for 2019, along with suggested committee members:
Subcommittees/Work Group Purpose Committee Members
Bederwood Sports field Special steering committee to improve
Bederwood Park with a sports field and
associated amenities.
Brian Roath
East Long Lake Trail Special steering committee for master plan
development and design guidance.
Jan Berg, Julie
Ruegemer, Brian Roath
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO PARK COMMISSION MEETING
Monday, January 7, 2018
6:30 o’clock p.m.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 2 of 9
Ice Rink Special steering committee to determine
policy and plan for the provision of ice
rinks within city parks.
Rick Meyers
Big Island Standing committee for planning and
executing improvements at the park as
well as being the liaison with other
interested groups.
Rick Carter
Julie Ruegemer
Jan Berg
Holiday Tree Lighting
Ceremony
Special steering committee to develop a
plan for an annual holiday tree lighting
ceremony
Brian Roath
Rick Meyers
Trails Standing committee to explore
opportunities for improvements and
additions to trails throughout the
community
Rick Carter
Beth Davis
Seven Nations Standing committee to explore the park’s
cultural history and develop an
improvement plan for the park.
Increase Community Outreach Standing committee to improve park
communication with the public and
involve volunteers within the parks.
Julie Ruegemer
Natalie Williams
Opportunities for Outside
Funding
Standing committee to identify and apply
for outside funding to support city parks
and trails.
Brian Roath
Julie Ruegemer
Golf Course Standing committee for planning and
executing improvements at the park as
well as being a liaison with other
interested groups.
Brian Roath
Rick Meyers
Roath noted Bederwood Park, East Long Lake Trail and Big Island are must haves since those
committees are involved in ongoing endeavors. Roath stated he sees the rest of the subcommittees up for
debate.
Roath noted new to the city is the ice rink at Crystal Bay Park this year. At the last meeting the Park
Commission talked about the need to reassess whether the City should continue with the ice rink based on
experiences this year. The Park Commission is looking at a good amount of investment in the rink in
2019 if it is decided to continue with that and they should determine what the City’s plan is for both of the
City’s ice rinks.
Edwards stated if the City is going to have ice rinks, the question is what standards the City should
construct and maintain them to. The subcommittee could explore that and bring back recommendations.
Roath recommended the holiday tree lighting ceremony be expanded to say community events held at the
golf course so it could encompass the holiday tree lighting ceremony as well as other events. The trails
subcommittee looks at the City’s network of trails and possible future connections. There were some
questions raised at a tour of the parks about whether a subcommittee is necessary for Seven Nations Park.
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO PARK COMMISSION MEETING
Monday, January 7, 2018
6:30 o’clock p.m.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 3 of 9
Edwards noted the subcommittees listed from trails on down are existing committees and were instituted
by the Park Commission when it was recommissioned in 2014.
Roath stated the next one is community outreach, which would include articles in the newsletter,
partnering with community organizations, reaching out to various groups, and the adopt-a-park program.
Opportunities for outside funding is learning about various grants. The last subcommittee is the golf
course and the subcommittee should look at the long-term vision for that.
Berg stated the Park Commission also discussed expanding use at the golf course.
Roath asked what focuses the Park Commission is interested in.
Carter stated as it relates to trails, when the Comprehensive Plan section was done, the trail projects were
prioritized. Carter stated in his view someone should look at that list and compare it to the list before the
Park Commission. The connection from Dakota to County Road 15 and then County Road 15 south was
probably at the top. If that group is responsible to do that, Carter indicated he is fine with being on the
committee.
Berg noted the East Long Lake Trail also encompasses Summit Beach, which will be upgraded in
connection with the trail.
Roath stated the Park Commission made some progress last year in defining a loose vision for the trail
system in relation to the Comprehensive Plan and asked whether there is anything more to do with the
trails.
Carter noted there is a list of trails included within the Comprehensive Plan and that he would like to
revisit that to see how the lists compare.
Edwards stated the committee worked on the trail section of the Comprehensive Plan this past year.
Johnson commented there are quite a few things included on the list, and the upper portion contains more
things that have evolved, with the bottom part of the chart being more general things that were
implemented when the Park Commission started back up in 2014. Johnson asked whether there needs to
be a separate focus on funding with the opportunities for outside funding.
Roath stated that is probably redundant.
Johnson stated as it relates to the golf course, the Park Commission is looking at doing a number of
different events and projects. Johnson asked whether there should be one focus and one committee
instead of an events committee.
Johnson noted he did receive a phone call from Rick Meyers and he was excited about improvements at
Summit Beach.
Berg stated they are looking at perhaps adding some playground equipment and other amenities to make it
more in spirit with the trail. Berg stated she also is not sure whether the name will stay the same and that
they are looking at having the trail and the beach the same name.
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO PARK COMMISSION MEETING
Monday, January 7, 2018
6:30 o’clock p.m.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 4 of 9
Ruegemer stated Seven Nations could be taken off as a focus park for 2019 and that she would be willing
to be the lead commissioner on that park. Ruegemer stated in her view there does not need to be a big
focus on it this year and that it could be removed from the focus list.
Ruegemer also suggested combining the golf course and events committees.
Roath asked whether the Park Commission is okay with moving the Holiday Tree Lighting Ceremony
Committee under the Golf Course, eliminating the Opportunities for Outside Funding Committee, and
moving Summit Beach under East Long Lake Trail.
It was the consensus of the Park Commission that they would be okay with eliminating the Opportunities
for Outside Funding Committee and moving Summit Beach under the East Long Lake Trail Committee.
Johnson stated if more events are added to the golf course, they may want to have a separate committee
for that.
Berg noted they are also looking at an Easter egg hunt and Octoberfest, and if additional events are held
there, it might be better to have a separate committee.
Roath stated he agrees those are two separate things, but that he likes one golf course committee, which
would include operations of the golf course and special events; and as needed, as special events come up,
the committee could ask for additional volunteers.
Johnson stated in his view the list should have the Lurton Dog Park on it since the park is filled quite a bit
of the time and there are still some things that need to be done. Johnson commented it would be nice to
hold some kind of event there. Since the dog park is important to so many people in the City, the Park
Commission should keep an eye on it.
It was the consensus of the Park Commission to add the Lurton Dog Park to the list and to remove
Seven Nations.
Edwards asked whether the Park Commission would rather have an events committee instead of simply
placing events under the golf course.
Roath stated they could add a community events group, which would encompass any event at any park.
Edwards commented there seems to be more interest in having these types of events and that it does take
a lot of coordination early on.
Berg indicated she is in agreement with that.
Roath stated increased community outreach is important but that he does not know if it is more of a role
of the Park Commission than a subcommittee.
Ruegemer stated it is important and that she would be happy to work on that. Ruegemer stated she does
not know it needs to be listed as a focus since it is more ongoing.
Johnson commented holding events is certainly one way of increasing outreach.
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO PARK COMMISSION MEETING
Monday, January 7, 2018
6:30 o’clock p.m.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 5 of 9
Roath stated it perhaps should be community events and outreach.
Berg stated that is one possibility.
Ruegemer noted the Park Commission discussed a couple of years ago the North Arm trail going from
County Road 51 to the Lakeview Legacy Park. A study was done and a plan was developed but then it
got put on the back burner due to other things going on. Ruegemer stated when the residents lost
Lakeview, they lost a huge recreational space in that part of the City. The City received approximately
$250,000 in park fees and that it would make sense to make that park more accessible. Currently it is
only accessible to the nearby residents but the road is too busy to walk on. The proposed trail was rock
and gravel trail and would only be for walking and not biking. Ruegemer stated she would like to make
that more of a priority.
Carter stated it might have been one of the top priorities in the Comprehensive Plan.
Edwards stated the Comprehensive Plan lists it as priority number five.
Carter stated one of the duties of the trails committee should be to review that list and make sure the list is
in the right order as it relates to priorities.
Johnson stated originally when that trail was brought up, it was perceived to be a safety issue. To a lot of
the people who would like to visit that park, the park has been an attractive nuisance since they are
walking on a road that is not meant to be walked on. Johnson stated in his view it would be good to have
some sort of survey done of the people in the area and that there is a historic and a safety basis for the
trail. The other issue would be to make sure that the people who would be affected by the trail could be
brought into the discussion.
Carter stated in his view it could be part of the trails subcommittee.
Roath asked what is happening currently with Big Island.
Carter stated there is a Big Island Committee and that their biggest activity right now is to create
interpretive panels for the visitor center. The committee identified eight panels detailing the history of
Big Island, such as the history of the Native Americans on the Island, the park, the glacial impacts, and
the game farm. Carter indicated he is meeting Friday with representatives with the Minnehaha Creek
Watershed District on how to create a floral and fauna panel and that he is hoping by spring the inside of
the building will be painted and the interpretive panels will be installed. Carter commented he hopes
there will be some additional improvements, such as a bathroom.
Roath noted there is a separate committee for that and asked whether there needs to be a separate
committee for that under the Park Commission.
Carter stated the Big Island Committee falls under a different organization and that he could be the Park
Commission liaison to that committee and that they do not need to have a separate subcommittee.
Berg asked whether the 501(3)(c) has been set up yet.
Mayor Walsh indicated it has been done.
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO PARK COMMISSION MEETING
Monday, January 7, 2018
6:30 o’clock p.m.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 6 of 9
Berg commented it is probably not necessary, then, for her and Julie to be on the subcommittee.
Edwards indicated he will remove the Big Island subcommittee and will put Rick Carter down as the
liaison.
Roath stated there is work to be done at Bederwood and that a subcommittee is needed for that as well as
East Long Lake. Work on East Long Lake is a 2020 project but there will be a lot of planning and grant
requests that will occur in 2019.
Edwards reported grants are being put together for Big Island and East Long Lake Trail. The grants are
good for 24 months and are being put together based on the master plan that was approved last year. The
Bederwood grant was approved. Edwards stated he will be taking an engineering proposal to the City
Council at the end of January, and if that is approved, the Bederwood committee will need to get together
to discuss the plan.
Roath asked whether there should be a subcommittee for ice rinks.
Edwards stated Rick Meyers is interested in doing that.
Berg asked whether both of the rinks will be included in that.
Edwards indicated they will be. Edwards stated the Public Works Department has not been able to get
good ice to freeze on the rink so far due to the weather.
Roath noted there is an open spot on Bederwood since Natalie is not staying on the Park Commission and
that he can be removed from East Long Lake Trail. Roath asked whether Jan and Julie would like to stay
on the East Long Lake Trail subcommittee.
Johnson stated what he has heard from Rick Meyers is that he is interested in being on the East Long
Lake Trail subcommittee as well.
Johnson commented he is happy to stay on the Lurton Dog Park subcommittee along with Rick Meyers.
Ruegemer stated she is also willing to help out with Lurton.
Roath indicated he will leave Beth on there for now and that they can verify whether she is still interested.
Roath noted currently on the Trails subcommittee is Rick Carter, Chair; Julie Ruegemer; Bryce Johnson;
and Beth Davis.
Roath stated he will be the chair for Bederwood, Jan can be the chair on East Long Lake, and the ice rinks
will be Rick Meyers. Roath stated the vacancy on the ice rinks subcommittee can be filled by one of the
new commissioners.
Jan and Julie indicated they would be interested in serving on the Events subcommittee and that they can
act as co-chairs.
Roath stated there should probably be a third person on that subcommittee.
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO PARK COMMISSION MEETING
Monday, January 7, 2018
6:30 o’clock p.m.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 7 of 9
Roath indicated he will stay on the Golf Course subcommittee with Rick Meyers.
Berg stated if additional help is needed for the various events, they will reach out to the Park
Commission.
Bryce stated he will chair the dog park subcommittee.
Ruegemer stated she will be the lead for Seven Nations.
Park Assignments for 2019:
Park Lead Commissioner
Antoine Park Brian Roath
Bederwood Park Brian Roath
Casco Point Park Julie Ruegemer
Casco Point Rink Rick Meyers
Casco Point Beach Jan Berg
Crystal Bay Playground Julie Ruegemer
French Creek Preserve Rick Meyers
Hackberry Julie Ruegemer
Highwood Nature Trail Julie Ruegemer
Livingston Tower Rick Meyers
Lowry Woods Julie Ruegemer
Lurton Park Bryce Johnson, Rick Meyers
Lydiard Beach Jan Berg
Navarre Playground Julie Ruegemer
Saga Hill Bryce Johnson
Sandy Beach Jan Berg
Seven Nations Park Julie Ruegemer
Summit Beach Jan Berg
Golf Course Brian Roath, Rick Meyers
Big Island Rick Carter, Liaison
Roath suggested the Park Commission revisit the park assignments after the new commissioners come on
board.
Roath noted there are some goals listed for 2019, and that he would recommend they discuss those at their
February work shop.
Johnson indicated he likely will not be in attendance.
Carter suggested he send some suggestions.
Edwards stated the goals can be adjusted through the year and that the new commissioners will need some
guidance as well. Edwards indicated he will send out an updated list.
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO PARK COMMISSION MEETING
Monday, January 7, 2018
6:30 o’clock p.m.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 8 of 9
STAFF REPORTS
3. PUBLIC WORKS PARKS UPDATE – ADAM EDWARDS
Edwards reported the Public Works Department has performed the following work:
• Parking lot snow and ice removal, equipment maintenance
• Snow and ice removal on trails
• Holiday event setup/cleanup at the golf course as well as equipment maintenance
• Ice rink construction at Crystal Bay and stump and tree removal
• Casco Ice Rink was prepped for ice
• Opened winter access gates, closed summer access gates, repaired Stubbs Bay dock
• Hackberry Park – tree removal in playground
• Lurton Park – parking lot snow and ice removal. Pending is construction of a porta-pot surround
The following work is pending:
• Christmas tree collections, parking lot snow and ice removal, snow and ice removal in general,
tree trimming and removal
• Trails – snow and ice removal
• Orono Golf Course – tree maintenance, seasonal employee recruitment
• Crystal Bay – flooding/ice maintenance
• Casco Ice Rink – ice maintenance/restoration
• Casco Point access sign replacement
• Hackberry – remove old wooden benches, install new basketball backboards
• Saga Hills – placement of a sitting boulder, tree removal
Edwards reported the City did receive a portion of the Bederwood grant they had applied for and that
Staff will be looking to get approval for a detailed design/engineering plan in the spring and hopefully
later in the summer break ground on the project.
A grant application is in the process of being completed for Big Island and East Long Lake Trail. The
majority of the grants being applied for are DNR grants.
In 2018, 523 passes were sold for Lurton Dog Park, which consisted of 206 residents and 337
nonresident. So far in 2019 there have been 102 passes sold so far, which is down slightly from 2018.
Roath stated since the City did not receive all of the grant money requested for Bederwood, part of the
committee’s role will be to decide what projects the money should be spent on.
Edwards stated they will need to survey and design the soccer field and that he will be obtaining a
proposal from Bolton & Menk for that work. Once that is received, he will need to receive permission
from the City Council to go ahead with that plan.
SPECIAL COMMITTEE REPORTS
None
MINUTES OF THE
ORONO PARK COMMISSION MEETING
Monday, January 7, 2018
6:30 o’clock p.m.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Page 9 of 9
4. COMMISSIONERS’ UPDATES
None
ADJOURNMENT
Johnson moved, Berg seconded, to adjourn the Orono Park Commission meeting at 7:22 p.m.
VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
ATTEST:
___________________________________
Brian Roath, Acting Chair
PARK COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM
Prepared By: Reviewed By: Approved By:
Item No.: 2 Date: March 4th, 2019
Item Description: Recognition of Departing Commissioners
Presenter: Adam T. Edwards, P.E.
Dir, Public Works/City Engineer
Agenda Section: Chairman’s Report
1. Purpose. The purpose of this item is to acknowledge Ms. Brenda Johnson and Ms. Natalie Williams
for their service as Park Commissioners.
2. Background.
A. Brenda Johnson served as a Park Commissioner from March 2014-March 2019. During her term she
also served as a member of the Lurton Park, Seven Nations Park, Trails and Website subcommittees.
B. Natalie Williams served as a Park Commissioner from March 2017-March 2019. During her term she
also served as a member of the Lurton Park and Bederwood Park subcommittees.
3. Recognition. The City council passed resolutions of appreciation at their February 25th Council
meeting. Plaques commemorating their time with the commission are ready for presentation.
COMMISION ACTION REQUESTED
Presentation of Resolutions and Plagues to outgoing Commissioners.
Exhibits
A. Resolutions of Appreciation
0 CITY OF ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
G
No. 9 4 8
t`
9kES H 4
A RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION TO
NATALIE WILLIAMS
FOR DISTINGUISHED SERVICE
AS A MEMBER OF THE
PARKS COMMISSION
WHEREAS,Natalie Williams has served this community with distinction during her two
years as a member of the Parks Commission; and
WHEREAS, her years of service have been marked by exemplary dedication to the best
interests of the community; and
WHEREAS, she has earned the admiration and high regard of those with whom she has
worked; and
WHEREAS, the performance of her duties and responsibilities as a member of the Parks
Commission has been characterized by excellent and constructive contributions to the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Orono
does hereby express its sincere appreciation and thanks to Natalie Williams for her distinguished
service to the community and does also highly commend her for the manner in which she has
carried out her duties and responsibilities.
BE IT FiJRTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council extends to her best wishes for
continued success in her future endeavors.
Adopted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 25th day
of February,2019.
A EST:
Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh,Mayor
0 CITY OF ORONO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
rro. 4 4 9Gt`
kES H 4
A RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION TO
BRENDA JOHNSON
FOR DISTINGUISHED SERVICE
AS A MEMBER OF THE
PARKS COMMISSION
WHEREAS,Brenda Johnson has served this community with distinction during her six
years as a member of the Parks Commission; and
WHEREAS, her years of service have been marked by exemplary dedication to the best
interests of the community; and
WHEREAS, she has earned the admiration and high regard of those with whom she has
worked; and
WHEREAS,the performance of her duties and responsibilities as a member of the Parks
Commission has been characterized by excellent and constructive contributions to the community.
NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED,that the City Council of the City of Orono
does hereby express its sincere appreciation and thanks to Brenda Johnson for her distinguished
service to the community and does also highly commend her for the manner in which she has
carried out her duties and responsibilities.
BE IT FLJRTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council extends to her best wishes for
continued success in her future endeavors.
Adopted by the City Council of Orono, Minnesota at a regular meeting held this 25th day
of February, 2019.
ATTEST:
Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh, Mayor
PARK COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM
Prepared By: Reviewed By: Approved By:
Item No.: 3 Date: March 4th, 2019
Item Description: Welcome New Commissioners
Presenter: Adam T. Edwards, P.E.
Dir, Public Works/City Engineer
Agenda Section: Chairman’s Report
1.Purpose. The purpose of this item is to welcome new Park Commissioners.
2.Background. At the February 25th Council meeting the Council appointed new commissioners to the
Park Commission. The City Council reappointed Rick Meyers as Park Commission Chair and Jan Berg as
park commissioner. Rick Carter and Casey Hudson were appointed as Park Commissioners. Jennifer
Klaahsen was appointed as an Alternate Park Commissioner. The appointment resolution is at Exhibit A.
COMMISION ACTION REQUESTED
None
Exhibits
A. Appointment Resolution
p CITY OF ORONO
RESOLUTION OF TIIE CITY COUNCIL
G`
No. b 9 4 6
l
kESH
A RESOLUTION
DESIGNATING APPOINTMENTS TO THE ORONO PARKS COMMISION
BE IT RESOLVED,by the City Council of the City of Orono,Minnesota that the
appointments for the Orono Parks Commission are as follows:
APPOINTMENT/DESIGNATION Term End Name
Park Commissioner,Chauman March 1s1,2022 Rick Meyers
Park Commissioner March ls,2022 Jan Berg
Park Commissioner March ls,2022 Casey Hudson
Park Commissioner March 15`,2020 Bryce Johnson
Park Commissioner March 15t,2022 Rick Carter
Park Commissioner March lst,2020 Julie Ruegemer
Park Commissioner March lst,2020 Brian Roath
Alternate Park Commissioner March lst,2022 Jennifer Klaahsen
Alternate Park Commissioner March lst,2020 Beth Davis
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Orono, Minnesota, at a regular meeting held February 25,
2019.
ATTEST:
Anna Carlson, City Clerk Dennis Walsh,Mayor
PARK COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM
Prepared By: Reviewed By: Approved By:
Item No.: 2 Date: March 4th, 2019
Item Description: 2019 Park Commission Goals and Subcommittee Assignments
Presenter: Adam T. Edwards, P.E.
Dir, Public Works/City Engineer
Agenda Section: Chairman’s Report
1. Purpose. The purpose of this item is finalize and approve the 2019 Park Commission Goals.
2. Background. At the January park commission meeting the Commission identified broad goals and
established committees to develop refined goals and work plans. At the February Work Session the
Commission refined some of goals and committee plans.
3. Park Commission Goals, Sub-committees/ working groups for 2019. See Exhibit A.
4. Park Assignments for 2019.
Park Lead
Commissioner
Park Lead Commissioner
Antoine Park Brian Roath Lowry Woods Julie Ruegemer
Bederwood Park Brian Roath Lurton Park Rick Meyers
Casco Point Park Julie Ruegemer Lydiard Beach Jan Berg
Casco Point Rink Navarre Playground Julie Ruegemer
Casco Point Beach Jan Berg Saga Hill Bryce Johnson
Crystal Bay Playground Julie Ruegemer Sandy Beach Jan Berg
French Creek Preserve Rick Meyers Seven Nations Park Julie Ruegemer
Hackberry Summit Beach Jan Berg
Highwood Nature Trail Julie Ruegemer Golf Course Brian Roath, Rick
Meyers
Livingston Tower Rick Meyers Big Island Rick Carter
Increase Community
Outreach
Julie Ruegemer
Park Signage Bryce Johnson
COMMISION ACTION REQUESTED
Move to adopt the Park Commission goals for 2019.
Exhibits.
A. Park Commission Committees and Goals.
2019 Park Commission Focus area / Committees and Goals
2019 Focus
Parks / Function
Sub-committees/
Work Group
Purpose Committee
Members
Goals Timeline / Milestones
(PC-Park Commission Lead; S-Staff Lead; CC-City Council)
Bederwood Sports
field
Bederwood Sports
field
Special steering committee to
improve Bederwood park with a
sports field and associated
amenities.
Brian Roath *
Rick Meyers
1. Design and construct sports field and other improvements at Bederwood
Park.
2. Solicit local organizations for sponsorship to cover items not funded by the
grant (trees, benches, picnic tables, shade sails, etc.)
3. Provide any other requested support to City Staff as they manage the
Bederwood development project.
4. Begin planning a grand-opening event in Spring 2020.
May 2019- Design Complete (S,PC)
Jun 2019- Award (CC)
Jun-Oct 2019 – Construct (S)
Apr 2020- Field ready for play (S)
East Long Lake
Trail and Summit
Beach
East Long Lake
Trail
Special steering committee for
masterplan development and
design guidance.
Jan Berg *
Julie Ruegemer
Rick Meyers
1. Secure grants for trail project seek grants to fund >50% of the project cost
2. Begin the design / engineering phase of the trail project.
Mar 2019- Trail grant due to DNR (S)
Jun 2019- Trail grant announced (S)
Dec 2019- Design complete/Approved (S,PC,CC)
Mar 2020- Trail award (S)
Mar 2020 –Playground grant due to HC (C,S)
Jun-Oct 2020 – Trail construction (S)
Winter Activities
(*Ice Rinks)
*Directed by City
Council)
Winter Activities Special steering committee to
determine policy and plan for
winter activities in City parks
with a focus on the provision of
ice rinks within City Parks.
Rick Meyers *
TBD
Goals of the Subcommittee are to:
1. Survey residents on their interest in Winter Activities at Orono Parks,
including Ice Skating, Fat Tire Biking, Nordic Skiing, Snowshoeing, Sledding,
etc. (Note, this survey will be used to inform other subcommittees too.)
2. Present to the City Council (by June 30) 3-4 options for a city-wide ice rink
master plan. The options should consider
a. level of service
b. cost/benefit, and should be informed by actual usage, Winter Activities
Survey and other community input.
c. options should also explore locations including Crystal Bay Park, Casco
Ave, Beaches/Lake access points, and the Golf Course.
3. Develop a plan for Crystal Bay Park Rink
April 2019- Winter activity Survey complete.
Jun 2019- Draft Ice Rink Master Plan/ Policy (PC, S, CC)
Jun 2019- Proposed design for Crystal Bay Rink (PC, CC)
July 2019- Award Crystal Bay Rink (CC)
Aug-Oct 2019- construct Rink (S)
Lurton Park Lurton Park Standing Committee to explore
opportunities for improvements at
the park
Bryce Johnson *
Rick Meyers
Pursue park improvements
Community Events
at Parks
Community Events Special steering committee to
develop a plan for an annual
holiday tree lighting ceremony
and other events at City Parks
Jan Berg *
Julie Ruegemer *
Rick Meyers
Special steering committee to develop a plan for an annual holiday tree lighting
ceremony and other events at City Parks
Goals for this subcommittee are:
1. Draft a 3-year schedule of community events held at Orono parks, hosted by
the Commission/City Council. Some of the events might not begin in 2019, but
should be recurring events. The plan should propose a budget for each
event. Events discussed might include: Holiday Tree Lighting, Oktoberfest, a
Dog Park event, and Community Activity Series).
2. Once the schedule is developed, socialize the event listing with area
organizations to drum-up interest in sponsorship.
3. Plan and coordinate the 2019 Holiday Tree Lighting event.
Jun 2019- Holiday Tree Lighting Plan complete (PC)
Dec 2019- Holiday Tree lighting Event (PC)
Aug 2019- 3 year schedule of events complete (PC)
Nov 2019- Sponsorship/ partnership for upcoming 3 years
of events complete.
Trails Standing Committee to explore
opportunities for improvements
and additions to trials throughout
the community.
Rick Carter *
Beth Davis
Bryce Johnson
Julie Ruegemer
1. Review the list below and confirm our priorities for 2040. We can amend
the comp plan according to Adam.
2. Establish a five year plan including initial recommendations for the capital
expense budget, based on our priorities.
3. Discuss the community outreach required for each of the priorities.
Big Island Rick Carter * 1. Secure grants for ADA Trail and Park improvements
2. Complete Historical Survey of Big Island
3. Begin the design / engineering ADA Trail and Park improvements
4. Complete Interpretive sign design and install
Mar 2019- Park grant due to DNR (S)
Jun 2019- Park grant announced (S)
July 2019- Interpretive sign design complete / installation
(PC, S)
Dec 2019- Improvements design complete/Approved
(S,PC,CC)
Mar 2020- Improvements Award (S)
Jun-Oct 2020 – Improvements Construction (S)
Golf Course Brian Roath
Rick Meyers
TBD
As of February 7, 2019
PARK COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM
Prepared By: Reviewed By: Approved By:
Item No.: 5 Date: March 4th, 2019
Item Description: Outdoor Recreation Grant Application for Big Island Park
Presenter: Adam T. Edwards, P.E.
Dir, Public Works/City Engineer
Agenda Section: Staff Reports
1.Purpose. The purpose of this item is to inform the commission of the submission of the Natural
Resources Outdoor Recreation Grant Application for Big Island Park.
2.Background. In early 2017 the Big Island Committee was established to evaluate and develop a plan
to improve the Park and meet the goals of the 2011 Big Island Management Plan. The group worked with
staff, consultants and coordinated with MCWD to develop a master plan to guide improvements at the
park. The Council approved the Big Island Master Plan on April 23, 2018. In 2018 the City received a
grant for an archeological survey. That survey will take place early this spring. The Council passed a
grant application resolution on February 25th, 2019.
1.Project Scope. This grant application is to pay for a portion of the following items from the master
plan: ADA accessible pathway, overlook / pavilion area improvement, interpretive signage and ADA
restroom facilities. The draft grant application is at Exhibit A.
2.Cost. The estimated cost to for all of the improvements listed in the grant is $404,250. The estimated
annual maintenance cost for the items is $4725/yr. Detailed cost estimates are at Exhibit A.
3.Funding. Up to 50% ($202,125) of the improvement costs could be funded by the grant. The
remaining 50% ($202,125) would paid from the Parks Enterprise Fund or from other donor sources. As a
condition of the grant the city must provide the funding for at least 20% of the proposed costs. Ongoing
maintenance for any improvements made will be added to the Parks Operating Budget.
4.Way Forward.
When What
1 March 19 Draft Grant to DNR for Preliminary Review
29 March 19 Final Grant Due to DNR
June 2019 Grant Announcement from DNR
July-Aug 19 Design and coordination with partners
September 19 Award / Grant Agreement Signed
Oct 2019- September 2020 Construction
COMMISION ACTION REQUESTED
Provide comment on Grant Application.
Exhibit
A.Draft Grant Application
Rev. Aug 10, 2011
2019 Grant Application
Outdoor Recreation Grant Program
Submission Deadline: March 29, 2019
Before completing this application please read the 2019 Outdoor Recreation Program Manual
for further program information. Only one park may be included in an application. Applicants
are eligible to receive more than one grant.
This program is very competitive. Staff members are available to discuss your project or review
application materials. You are encouraged to submit any draft application or materials by
March 8th if you would like staff to provide comments. Be sure to allow enough time to
complete the Applicant Resolution and any appraisals (if your project includes land acquisition).
Only complete applications submitted by the deadline will be considered
Applications are to be submitted electronically in a “.pdf” format by the due date above. Paper
submission of applications will no longer be accepted unless arranged in advance of the due
date with program staff. To submit the application, email a pdf version of the application and
attachments to Parkgrants.DNR@state.mn.us.
Please format the entire application, including all attachments, as one pdf. Use the form
provided for each item or reproduce it in the same format. Use Item 1 – Application Summary
as your cover sheet. After submission, make sure you have received a confirmation email that
your application has arrived in a useable form by the due date. Applications submitted in an
unusable format will not be considered for funding.
Timeline: 2019 Grant Round
• Application materials become available .................December 2018
• Submission deadline ...............................................March 29, 2019
• Awards are announced ...........................................June 2019
• Agreements are signed – project may begin ..........September-October 2019
• Grants expire – projects must be completed .........June 30, 2021
For assistance, please contact
• Joe Hiller, 651-259-5538, joe.hiller@state.mn.us
• Audrey Mularie, 651-259-5549, Audrey.mularie@state.mn.us
• DNR Information Center, 1-888-646-6367
Rev. Aug 10, 2011
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Required for all projects:
Item 1: ...... Application Summary
Item 2: ...... Project Relation to SCORP
Item 3: ...... Cost Breakdown
Item 4: ...... Project Site Evaluation
Item 5: ...... Community Involvement
Item 6 ....... Availability for Public Use
Item 7: ...... Statement of Accessibility
Item 8: ...... Projected Operation and Maintenance Costs
Attachments:
Required for all Projects:
Attachment A: Applicant Resolution
Attachment B: Location Map
Attachment C: Recreational Site Plan
Attachment D: Photos
Required if applicable to your project:
Attachment E: Plans
Attachment F: Appraisal(s) – Required for all land acquisition projects.
Rev. Aug 10, 2011
ITEM 1 - APPLICATION SUMMARY – 2019 APPLICATION
Applicant Information
Name of applicant: City of Orono
Name and title of contact: Adam T. Edwards, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Address: 2750 Kelley Parkway
City: Orono State: MN Zip Code: 55356
Phone: 952-249-4661 Email: aedwards@ci.orono.mn.us
Park Information
Park Name: Big Island
Park Address: 100 Big Island
City: Orono Zip Code 55331
County: Hennepin
Existing Park Acres: 56.5
Project Information
Type (Check all that apply to this project):
☐ Acquisition: Acres to be purchased: Click to enter amount.
☒ New Development/Construction
☒ Redevelopment/ Rehabilitation
☐ Replacement/ Demolition
Description: Provide a short narrative (less than 50 words) of your project proposal. You will
describe the merits of your project in Item 2 and the detailed costs/dimensions in Item 3 below.
Include only items that will be accomplished with this project. Do not include work to be
accomplished in future phases.
The purpose of the Big Island Park Project is to facilitate use of the park by visitors with
mobility impairments by upgrading select trails to Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
standard and providing ADA compliant restrooms and picnic facilitates. The project will also
improve public education through the provision of interpretive signage and security with trail
gates and security cameras.
Financial Information
The Applicant must provide a non-state match of at least 50% of the total cost. This match may
consist of cash or the value of materials, labor and equipment usage by the local sponsor or
donations or any combination of these. Applicants that provide at least 20% of the match from
their own resources will receive additional consideration in the review criteria. The total cost
shown below must equal the total costs shown in Item 3 – Cost Breakdown.
Total Project Cost: $ 404,250
Grant Request: $ 202,125
Match Amount: $ 202,125
Match Description: Provide source and type of match. Committed or pending.
Rev. Aug 10, 2011
The City is prepared to provide the entirety of the match. However the Big Island 501C3
organization has expressed an interest in contributing. Should any funds be secured, and
allowed by the granting authority, it would reduce the contribution needed by the City. In no
event shall the City’s contribution fall below the required 20% amount.
Rev. Aug 10, 2011
ITEM 2 - PROJECT RELATION TO SCORP
Discuss any of the following topics from the Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan
(SCORP) that apply to your project. The SCORP is available at this link.
Does the project connect people to the outdoors?
1. Does the proposed project contribute towards creating a welcoming environment? Are
there accessible features included as part of this project or currently in the park, such as
seating, restrooms and drinking water? Yes, the primary purpose of this project is to
make the park more accessible. When the park was created from the former
Minnesota Veterans Camp, a promise was made to the veterans of the state that the
park would remain accessible to them, this project through the upgrade of select trails
to ADA standard and the provision of ADA standard restroom and picnic facilities
endeavors to extend that accessibility to the ageing and disabled veteran populations.
Since the park is public and open to all these improvements will enhance accessibility
for all mobility challenged visitors.
2. Does the proposed project create or improve access to outdoor recreation lands and
facilities by providing alternative transportation and improving access for people of all
abilities? Describe the forms of transportation available to access the park facility (e.g.
trails, roads, public transportation, any transportation provided to the park for special
events or programs, etc. The Park is located on an island within Lake Minnetonka. The
island is accessible by boat. A previous project provided dock facilities that are ADA
compatible. The docks are public and available for all to use. Once at the island the
park is accessible via a trail network. The purpose of this project is to transition select
trails to an ADA standard thereby improving access for all. Numerous groups use the
park throughout the year including education groups, recreation groups and veteran
groups.
3. Does the proposed project result in quality experiences and facilities such as
interpretive signs to enhance visitor’ experience, redeveloping overused facilities, etc.
The project includes the provision of interpretive signage to be placed at the visitor
center (existing) and at key points along the ADA accessible trail to be constructed.
The signs are intended to focus on the history and the natural attributes of the park.
Also the project will provide ADA accessible toilets to ensure that visitors have access
to those comforts while at the island. The provision of picnic and overlook facilities
will allow visitors to socialize and enjoy the park with their friends and families.
Does the project acquire land and/or create opportunities?
1. Does the proposed project acquire critical lands in jeopardy of being lost to
development, or land use changes; or is this an exceptional one time opportunity to
acquire high quality natural resources? This project does not acquire land.
2. Does the proposed project acquire land that protects shoreland, rivers, lakes, wetlands
and critical watersheds? This project does not acquire land.
Rev. Aug 10, 2011
3. Does the project meet the differing outdoor recreation needs of people of all abilities
such as a quality natural setting, universal design, family friendly facilities, more
separation of uses, privacy between camp sites, etc.? Yes, the project connects the
various portions of the park: docks, visitor center, overlooks and beach. In addition it
provides access for all to enjoy the history and natural beauty of the island.
4. Does the project create an environment that is open and flexible to accommodate new
and emerging nature based trends or develop group based recreational opportunities
such as group campsites, picnic areas or gathering spaces, large open play areas or
emerging nature based activities, etc. Yes, the project connects the various portions of
the park: docks, visitor center, overlooks and beach. In addition it provides access for
all to enjoy the history and natural beauty of the island. The provision of a pavilion
provides a space for educational groups that visit the island though summer months
to use as an outdoor classroom. Regular use of the park for educational purposes has
waned in recent years with the reasons cited as a lack of restroom facilities and
shelter in the park to support those activities.
5. Does the project establish a sustainable and resilient infrastructure to provide high
quality recreational opportunities such as a) sustainable and resilient infrastructure, b)
energy efficient, easy to maintain and recycled/recyclable materials and/or c)
conservation of water use and the design of facilities to effectively manage storm water
on site. The trail design will call for the use of natural materials such as chipped stone
and will include restoration and erosion prevention improvements along the edges.
The structures will be constructed of robust and durable materials stone, concrete and
steel. The park did have some issues with vandalism in the past so all planned
improvements are to be robust and vandalism resistant. This will be reinforced with
security measures such as security cameras and trail gates to protect the public
investment in the facilities and ensure they are available for the public to enjoy for
years to come.
Does the project take care of what we have?
1. Does the project result in redevelopment, renovation or rehabilitation of current
infrastructure such as restoring worn out, degraded facilities and improvements to meet
current codes and standards? This project rehabilitates and improves select trials
within the park to an ADA standard. The facilities to be constructed replace
structures removed several years ago. The old structures were remnants from the
Park’s previous use as a veteran’s camp (1923-2006). The toilet structures will be
precast vaulted structures similar to those used by the national parks service, our
state parks and Three Rivers Park District. Rather than benches the overlook areas
gathering sites will use natural sitting stones and picnic tables will be constructed
using concrete and stone.
2. Does the project result in maintaining the quality of natural resources through
preservation, restoration or reconstruction? This project endeavors to maintain the
quality of the parks natural resources by maximizing the reuse the existing developed
sites and trails. The provision of picnic and overlook facilities replaces facilities that
were previously removed as they reached the end of their useful life.
Rev. Aug 10, 2011
Rev. Aug 10, 2011
ITEM 3 - COST BREAKDOWN
Development (see Program Manual for eligibility) Contingency costs are not eligible.
Design/Engineering costs in excess of 10% of the total project construction cost are not eligible.
Enter information in the table(s) below.
Facility
(e.g. picnic
area,
campground)
Description
(linear feet, dimensions, material used, number of
components, etc.)
Estimated
Cost
Expected
Completion
Date
Dock Area
Improvements
Informational sign 1 EA $1,000 $1,000 Oct 2020
Security camera 2 EA $500 $1,000 Oct 2020
Trails Crushed Limestone Trail
(ADA accessible) 4800 LF $22 $105,600 Oct 2020
Trail Gate 2 EA $1,100 $ 2,200 Oct 2020
Bollard/Rocks 12 EA $100 $ 1,200 Oct 2020
Restrooms Vault toilet (Visitor center) 1 EA $75,000 $ 75,000 Oct 2020
Vault toilet (Overlook) 1 EA $75,000 $ 75,000 Oct 2020
Overlook Area Picnic table 5 EA $3,500 $ 17,500 Oct 2020
Shade structure/Viewing
Platform 1 LS $80,000 $ 80,000 Oct 2020
Sitting stones 6 EA 500 $ 3,000 Oct 2020
Interpretive
Signage
Wayfinding/interpretive
signs 6 EA $1,000 $ 6,000 Oct 2020
Administration
and
Engineering
10% of construction costs 1 LS $ 37,650
$ 36,750
Oct 2020
Total
$ 404,250
Land Acquisition (if applicable)
Parcel Identification Number or location Acres Appraised
Value
Expected
Acquisition
Date
NA
Total
Rev. Aug 10, 2011
ITEM 4 - PROJECT SITE EVALUATION
All applicants must prepare and submit a Project Site Evaluation using the format shown below.
The project site evaluation will provide information necessary to determine the impacts of the
project, if any, on the environmental and cultural resources of the area.
The following sources of information may be helpful in completing the evaluation:
Endangered Species:
Information on animals and plants that are endangered, threatened or merit special
consideration or management is available from the Minnesota Natural Heritage
Program/Nongame Wildlife Program, Section of Wildlife, Department of Natural Resources
(DNR). A booklet entitled Minnesota’s List of Endangered and Threatened Animal Species, that
includes a list of all species of Minnesota's animals and plants listed under the provisions of the
Federal Endangered Species Act of 1973, Public Law 93-205, and/or Minnesota Statute 84.0895,
is available from the DNR by calling (651) 296-6157 or (888) 646-6367 or at the DNR website
Minnesota's Endangered, Threatened, and Special Concern Species
Additional information may be obtained by calling the Division of Ecological Resources
information number at (651) 259-5100. The DNR is also developing biological surveys on a
county-by-county basis on sensitive natural habitats and rare plant and animal species. Several
publications are available which provide detailed information on these subjects. Additional
information about county biological surveys is available at Minnesota Biological Survey.
Wetlands:
Minnesota has adopted a "no-net-loss" wetlands policy. Each state agency must ensure that its
activities, including state sponsored, financed or assisted projects, do not contribute to the loss
or diminishment of the many important values of wetlands. Unavoidable impacts must be
minimized and compensatory mitigation must be provided for all values that have been lost or
diminished. It is very important, therefore, that the project site evaluation identify all possible
wetlands impacts of the proposed project. This will help in determining whether any changes in
project scope or design may be required or whether mitigation measures must be undertaken.
The basic reference for wetland determination will be the National Wetlands Inventory
produced by the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service and available at the DNR. Questions regarding
implementation of the "no-net-loss" policy and identification of wetlands may be directed to
the Ecological Resources Division, DNR at (651) 259-5100.
PROJECT SITE EVALUATION - FORMAT
Please prepare a project site evaluation using the following format and subject categories.
Address all of the points covered under each category and be specific. It is important that the
project site evaluation be a complete and accurate assessment of the natural and/or scenic
characteristics of the area and the likely impacts of the project, either positive or negative, on
those characteristics.
Rev. Aug 10, 2011
Project Site Evaluation:
Description of the Environment and the Environmental Impact of the Proposed Project
A. Present Land Use: Describe the present land use of the proposed project site. State the
applicant’s ownership (fee title, easement, etc.). If property is to be acquired, will it be a
high priority inholding or addition crucial to the use of, ecological integrity of, or access to
an existing natural or scenic area? Address any other impacts the proposed project may
have on the present land use of the project site or adjacent lands.
Big Island Park is owned and operated by the City of Orono. It is a 56-acre passive
recreational park with minimal existing facilities. The Park is intended to serve a dual
role in preservation of the unique natural setting while offering the public a variety of
passive recreational opportunities. The Park preserves a diversity of natural resources
including maple-basswood forest, wetlands, and more than 1.4 miles of undeveloped
Lake Minnetonka lakeshore providing ecological and passive recreational benefits for
the Lake Minnetonka region and the state. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District
partnered with city in the acquisition and initial development of the park and hold and
easement over the park restricting/ designating the uses in the various portion of the
park. The City and watershed developed a management plan for the park in 2011 that
govern how the park is to be improved, preserved and maintained. The proposed
project is in keeping with the easement and management plan. The proposed
improvements, per the goals of the existing Big Island Park Management Plan, will
have minimal impacts on the natural and cultural resources of the Park.
B. Environmental Intrusions: Describe all man-made developments on, above, below or
adjacent to the proposed project site, including buildings, utility poles and lines, roads,
driveways, pipelines, sewer and water lines, fences, ditches, bridges, billboards, railroad
tracks, and related structures or facilities. Explain how these intrusions, if any, might affect
the use, protection, and enjoyment of the proposed project site and what measures will be
taken to minimize any adverse impacts. All existing and future overhead power lines
serving the park must be placed underground. The cost of placing the power lines
underground can be included in this application.
Docks: Two docks are currently provided at the main entry point of the Park along its
southwesterly shore to allow for boating access. Located at the site of the boat
landing that originally served the Big Island Amusement Park and later the Veterans
Camp, they include a large floating dock suitable to accommodate large craft such as
the historic steamer Minnehaha, and a parallel dock for smaller boats. No
improvements are anticipated for the docks, resulting in minimal or no impact to the
environment. Trails: Visitors enjoy more than 1-1/2 miles of informal grass/dirt trails
that wander through woods and open meadows within the 56-acre Park. Beautiful
vistas of Lake Minnetonka are encountered where the trails traverse the bluffs near
the shore. A majority of the trail system is essentially unimproved, with just a few
short segments of deteriorated pavement remaining from the amusement park era.
The trails are not marked, but are easily followed. The main goal of the trail
improvements is to make visiting the island park ADA accessible. By upgrading the
existing trails to be ADA compliant, this goal will be accomplished. There will be
minimal disturbance and impact on the natural and cultural resources. Only existing
trail areas where slopes are greater than allowable for ADA access will be modified.
Rev. Aug 10, 2011
All other trail alignments will follow existing pathways, because existing trails
alignments are being used, the trail improvements will have minimal impact on the
Park’s ecology. Swimming Beach: A natural swimming beach approximately 200 feet
in width is located along the southeasterly shore of the Park. The beach is enjoyed by
Park visitors who arrive at the docks as well as recreational boaters who pull their
watercraft up to the shore at or near the beach. The beach area is not improved, is
not attended by a lifeguard, and is posted ―No Life Guard On Duty. No improvements
or impacts are planned for the swimming beach. Signage: Signage that could be
characterized as primarily regulatory in nature was installed at appropriate locations
within the Park in spring 2009, addressing No Fishing from Dock; No Life Guard on
Duty; No Dumping Allowed; and general park rules & prohibitions. As part of the
proposed improvements, interpretive signage will be installed in key area of interest
to help educate park users. The signage will be basic in color and design. Signage will
blend into the natural environment. Little or no ecological impact is anticipated.
Buildings: Entry Office Structure. The existing small 256 s.f. building and attached
deck near the main entry dock area has been retained for future use as an entry portal
to the Park. The building has been in its current location since 1997-98 and served the
veterans Camp as an entry point for camp visitors. ADA access to the entry office
structure will be provided as part of this project. Minor grading near the building may
be necessary to accommodate the ADA path.
C. Fish and Wildlife: Indicate whether the proposed project site is on or adjacent to, a national,
state or local wildlife management area, park or natural area. Describe the known fish and
wildlife species common to the project site and any known species that are listed as
endangered, threatened or of special concern. Describe the likely impacts of the proposed
project on habitat, population levels, and any other factors related to the fish and wildlife
resources.
State listed special concern species exist on the island. A bald eagle (Haliaeetus
leucocephalus) nest is located in the woodland on the south side of the isthmus.
There are also records of two special concern fish species, pugnose shiners (Notropis
anogenus) and least darters (Etheostoma microperca), near Big Island.
There are no anticipated impacts to the fish and wildlife in and adjacent to the
project site. The trail work is on existing trails and the restroom and shelter are
planned for open areas where previous land alteration occurred. The Park also
abuts Three Rivers Park District’s Big Island Regional Park, a 62-acre wildlife
refuge that has remained completely undeveloped. Separated by a narrow
peninsula, the complementary parks share a goal of preserving the woodlands and
wetlands that provide habitat for a wide variety of animal and plant species.
D. Vegetation: Describe the major plant species and communities common to the project site
and any known species that are listed as endangered, threatened or of special concern.
Describe the distribution of major plant communities or types on the site. Indicate the
extent of cutting, clearing, removal or other disturbance that will result from the proposed
project, as well as any restoration and/or protection activities planned as part of the
project.
A limited natural resources inventory was performed by MCWD staff on May 26,
2010. The recreation areas were dominated by leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula) and
non-native grasses. The maple-basswood forest had a somewhat disturbed ground
layer, dominated by upland sedges and other species tolerant of earthworms and
Rev. Aug 10, 2011
deer browse. The shrub layer and subcanopy had good diversity and showed
evidence of forest regeneration, with young sugar maple (Acer saccharum),
ironwood (Ostrya virginiana), basswood (Tilia americana), hackberry (Celtis
occidentalis), and green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica). There were common
buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica) shrubs and seedlings scattered throughout. The
plant community in the isthmus wetland was cattail marsh, with lake sedge (Carex
lacustris) in shallower areas. There were scattered native forbs, and very little reed
canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea). The open water wetland has a fringe of sedge
species with a few patches of cattails and reed canary grass.
There are no anticipated impacts to the vegetation in and adjacent to the project
site. The proposed trail work is on existing grass/dirt trails and the restroom and
shelter are planned for open areas where previous land alteration occurred.
E. Water Resources: Describe any existing wetland areas on or adjacent to the proposed
project site. Indicate any likely physical disturbances of these wetlands, including (but not
limited to) draining and filling that would result from the proposed project. Describe any
other potential impacts to wetlands, such as water level fluctuations or water pollution that
may result from the proposed project. Discuss possible alternatives that would avoid or
minimize negative wetland impacts. Also describe any other water resources on or adjacent
to the site, proposed uses of surface or groundwater, and any possible impacts on these
resources, including depletion or pollution, resulting from the proposed project. Explain
how the proposed project would help to protect water quality on or adjacent to the site.
Five wetlands on the site were field assessed as part of the Watershed District‘s
Functional Assessment of Wetlands (FAW) when the park was purchased. Two
were given the manage class Preserve. The preserve designation was assigned based
on wetland functions. The FAW lists the following management goals for a preserve
wetland: avoid and preserve wetland if at all possible. No change in wetland
hydrology. No increase in nutrient load. According to the MLCCS, the easternmost
basin is a palustrine open water wetland, about 1.1 acres in size. On the western
isthmus there is a 4.9 acre wetland classified as a semi-permanently flooded cattail
marsh. The marsh received an MLCCS quality grade of C, indicating a moderate
quality natural community with obvious human impacts, but still recognizable as
native plant community. The FAW also recognizes a lacustrine fringe wetland on
the north side of the isthmus, and two small (1/4 to 1/3 acre) forested ephemeral
wetlands. There are no anticipated impacts to the wetlands in and adjacent to the
project site. The trail work is on existing trails and the restroom and shelter are
planned for open areas where previous land alteration occurred. Erosion control
best practices will be employed as part of the project.
F. Geologic and Physiographic Features: Describe any interesting, unique or fragile geologic
and/or physiographic features on the proposed project site and any likely impacts on these
features that would result from the proposed project. Also describe any proposed
protection activities or measures to provide public education, interpretation and enjoyment
of these resources.
There are steep bluffs on the eastern shoreline of the site. This area is currently
protected by a fence to deter park users from approaching the bluffs. The bluff area
will remain untouched by this project. Interpretive signage may be located along the
trail and overlook area of the bluffs, but will have no or minimal impact on the
surroundings. The wetlands on the site will not be affected by any of the
improvements.
Rev. Aug 10, 2011
G. Air Quality/Noise: Describe any temporary or permanent air or noise pollution that will
result from the development and use of the site and the impacts on adjacent land uses or
land owners.
The cove along the northern shore of Big Island Park has become a popular summer
weekend gathering place for boaters from far and wide, who often tie their craft
together. There are few if any similar shore locations on Lake Minnetonka where
adjacent lakeshore homeowners would not be affected by the noise of revelers and
bustle of boats coming and going. However, this level of activity is in stark contrast to
the serene natural character of Big Island Park. Because of this potential disturbance,
the northern edge of the Park is purposely untouched. No northern access points
onto the island are planned as to ensure as much separation as possible from the two
user groups.
H. Archeology/ Ground Disturbances: Provide a description of current and previous land use
and ground disturbances. Include available information concerning known or suspected
archaeological resources within the park. Indicate if an archaeological survey has been
previously completed for the park.
The Park has a long history from Native American use, to early European settlers, to
an amusement park in the early 1900s and then a Veterans Camp. There are
numerous foundations in the park from both the amusement park and the Veterans
camp period. The city has commissioned a Phase 1 Archeological survey for early
2019 funded by a grant from the state historical society. The intent is to use any
information learned from the survey for interpretive signage and future education
programs as well as to inform future improvements at the park. It is anticipated the
park improvements will have minimal ground disturbances. The ADA trail
improvements will follow the existing trail alignments for the majority of the site. If
slight grade or alignment changes are necessary to establish an ADA accessible path,
professional care will be taken to ensure the least amount of impact to the site.
I. Historic Structures: List known historic buildings or structures located within the project
area (i.e., individual properties or districts which are listed in the National Register or which
meet the criteria for listing in the National Register).
There are no structures in the park on the National Register. There are a couple
structures of local historical interest. The visitor center (a former veteran’s camp
cabin) an old fish cleaning shack from the veteran’s camp days and some of the
foundations of the amusement park. The visitor center was recently restored by a
volunteer group and will house some of the interpretive signage. The city is exploring
the viability of restoring, moving or recreating the fish cleaning shack as part of the
historical interpretation work.
Rev. Aug 10, 2011
ITEM 5 – COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
Address the following questions regarding community involvement, planning process and how
this project will increase outdoor recreation participation.
1. What efforts were made to get input from members of the community that will be
affected by this project? For example, public meeting(s), notification of adjoining
property owners, etc. The concept plan for the project was developed by a committee
of stakeholders. The plan was then presented at a MCWD public meeting, an Orono
Parks Commission public meeting and approved by the Orono city council at a public
council meeting.
2. What community planning process was used to show a need for this project and to
define its scope? The project was derived from a public process that aimed to achieve
the goals laid out in the Big Island Management Plan, November 2011. The
Management plan in turn was developed jointly by the City of Orono and MCWD using
a public process in order to provide goals and policies for the park.
3. How do you expect this project to increase outdoor recreation participation? The
provision of ADA trails will increase the accessibility of the park for all users. The
restrooms picnic shelter and other amenities will enable users to spend more time at
the island park. The interpretive signage will provide information on the parks
ecology and history. And, the security measures will help protect the environmental,
historical and cultural treasures at the park.
ITEM 6 – AVAILABILITY FOR PUBLIC USE
All facilities within the park must be designed and available for general public use and open
during typical park hours. This includes restrooms, picnic shelters, campgrounds, playgrounds
and other structures. For parks that include marina or campground facilities, a minimum of
50% of the berths/campground spaces must be available for short-term rental and an equitable
method of allocating long-term rentals shall be used. No fixed improvements such as decks,
porches, or signs are allowed.
State the specific hours of operation and any current or anticipated programmed use for the
facilities proposed to be funded with this application. Saying the park will be open during
normal park hours is not specific. Also describe any arrangements with schools, local
organizations, clubs or city programs for the use of the facilities. Explain how this may impact
facility availability to the general public.
Describe what fees, if any, will be charged for use of the park facilities and/or access to the
park?
The park is open to the general public. The park is open year round with operating hours of
6AM-10 PM. There are no user fees related to the park. The maintenance and upkeep of the
park is funded through Orono’s Parks Operating Budget of the City’s General Fund.
Rev. Aug 10, 2011
Rev. Aug 10, 2011
ITEM 7 - STATEMENT OF ACCESSIBILITY
All facilities improved with this grant project and all critical components of the park listed
below, must be made compliant with the ADA requirements even if they are not part of this
application proposal.
Critical components include:
• Accessible parking spaces serving each park area.
• Accessible restrooms, if restrooms are provided.
• Accessible drinking water, if drinking water is provided.
• Access routes to all critical components and recreation facilities provided in the park.
For this program, an access route must be a minimum of 5 feet wide, slip resistant, firm
and stable.
If a grant is awarded, part of the grant will be withheld pending verification of ADA compliance
by an on-site final inspection.
The following guidelines will help you design your facilities. Copies can be ordered from the
U.S. Access Board at (800) 872-2253, or downloaded from their website at United States Access
Board.
1. ADA Accessibility Standards for Buildings and Facilities
(For buildings and certain recreation facilities including playgrounds, recreational boating
facilities, and fishing piers)
2. Final Accessibility Guidelines for Outdoor Developed Areas September 26, 2013
(For outdoor developed areas such as campgrounds, picnic areas, trails, and beaches. These
guidelines, developed for federal facilities subject to the Architectural Barriers Act, are to be
used for facilities improved by this Outdoor Recreation Grant Program.)
Applicant should state that they have reviewed and understand the ADA standards, final
accessibility guidelines and our program requirements, stated above, and agrees to comply
with these requirements.
We have reviewed and understand the accessibility guidelines. The purpose of this project is
to ensure the park has trails and facilities that meet or exceed these guidelines providing
access to as broad a user group as possible.
ITEM 8 - PROJECTED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE COSTS
Estimate the projected operations and maintenance costs for each facility to be developed or
improved by this grant. Include routine costs (such as labor, materials, utility costs and
equipment costs), and planned major repairs or preventive maintenance (such as seal coating
or replacement of plumbing, lighting, aglime, turf, etc.).
The operations and maintenance of the project improvements will be added to the City’s
Parks Operating Budget. The following estimates are for the project improvements and do
not include existing maintence operations at the park nor depreciation. Trail maintenance
Rev. Aug 10, 2011
(surface grading, aggregate replenishment, vegetation management and erosion repairs is
estimated at $1365/ yr. Restroom (cleaning and refuse removal) is estimated at $780/yr.
Restroom tank pumping is estimated at $1200/y. Sign maintenance and replacement is
estimated at $600/yr. Amenities maintenance (security features, tables, picnic shelter) is
estimated at $780/yr. Total annual maintenance cost is estimated at $4,725/ year.
Rev. Aug 10, 2011
ATTACHMENT A - APPLICANT’S RESOLUTION
Rev. Aug 10, 2011
Rev. Aug 10, 2011
ATTACHMENT B - LOCATION MAP
Provide a map that shows the location of the park within your community. The map should
identify the main roads in the community to access the park.
Rev. Aug 10, 2011
ATTACHMENT C - RECREATIONAL SITE PLAN
This site plan must be drawn to scale, show the existing park boundary, all facilities now in the
park and all acquisition and/or development listed in the Cost Breakdown. All facilities must be
identified with legible labels.
Include the following:
• Title "Recreation Site Plan" and the project name.
• Draw and label the complete park boundary. This boundary must include all contiguous
lands currently owned by the applicant and managed for public recreation and any
additional land to be acquired with this grant.
• Entrance to site and location of existing or proposed public parking facilities. (Parking
facilities must be developed to serve newly acquired areas within 12 months).
• Location of all existing and planned recreation and support facilities such as restrooms,
shelters, and potable water.
• Indicate any rights-of-way, easements, reversionary interests, etc. to the park area
including overhead utility lines.
• Geographic reference point such as a section corner or designated road intersection.
• All lakes, rivers, streams and wetlands and adjacent land uses.
• Acreage of the park and/or each parcel to be acquired.
• Signed and dated by the applicant.
• North arrow and Graphic Bar Scale using the example below:
A Text Scale such as 1” = 500’ is not acceptable.
Color Coding
• Red Park boundary.
• Green Existing facilities that will remain.
• Yellow Acquisition and/or development accomplished with this grant
Separate Attachment
ATTACHMENT D – PHOTOS
Please insert photos of all existing recreational facilities/structures and all buildings. Indicate
below each photo the year the facility/building was constructed and if it will remain as is, be
renovated or be removed.
500
Feet
250 0
Rev. Aug 10, 2011
Park Docks with Visitor Center in the
background. Looking North. 2018. All of
these facilities to remain.
Visitor Center Building. Freshly rehabilitated
by volunteers. Looking west. 2018. Structure
to remain. Some of the interpretive signs will
be placed within.
Clearing area near beach. 2018. Prairie area looking south toward visitor
Center. 2018.
Rev. Aug 10, 2011
ATTACHMENT E – PLANS
Please submit all applicable plan(s) according to the directions provided.
Building Plans
All buildings constructed with grant funds must meet the State Building Code. Building plans
are required for all proposed facilities to ensure the development addresses accessibility and
design priorities. Plans must include the following:
1. Front and side views.
2. A floor plan with all dimensions.
Restroom Example
Rev. Aug 10, 2011
Pavilion Example
Rev. Aug 10, 2011
Trail Plans
Trail plans are required for projects that include the development of any type of trail and
should include the following:
1. A typical cross section of the trail.
2. The trail width, surfacing and base materials
For the purposes of this grant program a multipurpose trail should be designed to a minimum 8'
width. In some cases this minimum width may not be adequate and a width of 10' or more may
be appropriate. All access routes connecting park facilities and parking lots must be a minimum
of 5 feet wide.
Typical Trail section below. Trail is intended to be a ADA accessible hiking (walking Trail).
36” wide clear treadway with 60” wide passing spots at least every 1000ft per ABA 1017.
ATTACHMENT F – APPRAISAL(S) <<Only for proposals to acquire land>>
NA
PARK COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM
Prepared By: Reviewed By: Approved By:
Item No.: 6 Date: March 4th, 2019
Item Description: Local Trails Connection Grant Application
Presenter: Adam T. Edwards, P.E.
Dir, Public Works/City Engineer
Agenda Section: Staff Reports
1. Purpose. The purpose of this item is to inform the commission of the submission of the Local Trails
Connection Grant Application for East Long Lake Road.
2. Background. At the May 29th, 2018 meeting, the City Council directed staff and the Parks
Commission to develop a plan for the conversion of northern section East Long Lake Road to a trail. The
commission, city staff and our consultant have held several meeting and developed a concept plan for the
trail. The Council approved the plan on November 26th, 2018. The council approved the grant
application resolution on February 25th, 2019.
3. Project Scope. This grant application is to pay for a portion of the following items from the master
plan: removal of the existing asphalt, stabilizing the lakeshore where required, construction of a 10ft wide
multipurpose trail, benches, rock fishing points, and interpretive signage. The draft grant application is at
Exhibit A.
4. Cost. The estimated cost to for all of the improvements listed in the grant is $410,520. Detailed cost
estimates are at Exhibit A.
5. Funding. Up to 50% or $150,000 ($150,000) of the improvement costs could be funded by the grant.
The remaining $260,520 would paid from the Parks Enterprise, Stormwater fund, Street fund and from
other partner sources. Staff is currently working with Hennepin County’s Bicycle coordinator and Three
Rivers Park Districts Planning Department to partner on the project and connections with regional trails.
Ongoing maintenance for any improvements made will be added to the Parks Operating Budget.
6. Way Forward.
When What
1 March 19 Draft Grant to DNR for Preliminary Review
29 March 19 Final Grant Due to DNR
July 2019 Grant Announcement from DNR
August-December 2019 Design, permitting and coordination with partners
March 2020 Award / Grant Agreement Signed
June-October 2020 Construction
COMMISION ACTION REQUESTED
Provide comment on Grant Application.
Exhibit
A. Draft Grant Application
Revised 11/2018
Project #
LOCAL TRAIL CONNECTIONS PROGRAM
2019 Grant Application
1) GENERAL CONTACT INFORMATION:
Grant Applicant (Unit of
Government Required):
City of Orono, Mn
Contact Person: Adam T. Edwards, P.E.
Contact Title: Director of Public Works / City Engineer
Mailing Address:
2750 Kelley Parkway, Orono Mn, 55356
Phone: 952-249-4661
Email address: aedwards@ci.orono.mn.us
If the project has a trail club, organization, or project partner, please include below:
Organization/Club Name:
Contact Person:
Contact Title:
Mailing Address:
Phone:
Email address:
2) GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION:
Project Name: East Long Lake Trail
Project Summary
(30 words or less):
The project consists of the conversion of a section of East Long Lake Road
to a multimodal trail including the removal of the existing roadway
pavement, construction of a 10ft paved trail, drainage improvements,
plantings, and addition of elements such as benches and fishing spots.
Project Completion Date: Estimated as October 31st, 2020
Trail Name: East Long Lake Trail
Website with Trail Info: https://mn-orono2.civicplus.com/422/East-Long-Lake-Trail
3) FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
Grant Request: $150,000 Source of Cash Match (describe
below in the box next to $
amount):
Are these match funds
secured? (Check below):
YES NO
Non-State Cash
Matching Funds
(25% cash match
required):
$260,520
City of Orono X
TBD
Hennepin County X
TBD
Three Rivers Park District X
Total Project Cost: $ 410,520 (Grant Request + Matching Funds must = Total Project Cost)
If this project has received federal funding through the Enhancements Program or
MnDOT’s Transportation Alternatives Program, please indicate which year the project
is programmed for construction?
FFY:
NA
Revised 11/2018
4) PROJECT LOCATION:
County Project is Located: Hennepin
State Legislative (House) District: 33A
State Senate District: 33
State House Representative (name): Representative Jerry Hertaus
State Senator (name): Senator David Osmek
Congressional District: 3 – Congressman Dean Phillips
5) MEASURABLE TARGETS/OUCOMES:
It is required that measurable targets and outcomes be collected for your project. Complete the boxes
below on the right with exactly how many miles of trail that will be acquired, newly developed or existing
trail miles improved, along with the number of trailhead facilities, bridges, and/or culverts that will be
developed or restored as part of just this project, not the whole trail. After the project is complete the
measurable outcome will be compared with the target included.
Trail Miles to be Acquired: NA
New Trail Miles to be Developed/Created: 0.54
Existing Trail Miles to be Restored or Improved: NA
Number of Trailhead Facilities to be Developed or Restored: 2
Number of Trail Bridges/Culverts to be Developed or Restored: 1
6) RECREATIONAL USES FOR PROJECT:
6A) Indicate the existing or proposed uses of the trail under primary use and the secondary recreation
uses which will directly benefit from the proposed project:
Primary Use Secondary Use
X Walking/Hiking
X Bicycling
X Mountain Bicycling
Horseback Riding
Cross-Country Skiing
X In-Line Skating
Snowmobiling
ATV Riding
Off-Highway Motorcycling
Off-Road Vehicles (4x4, Jeep, etc.)
X Other (specify): Fishing and Canoeing
6B) Describe/Justify how each of the above identified primary and/or secondary trail user groups will
benefit from the project. Response required for each identified use above.
1. Walking – The new trail will provide a safe means of walking along the Eastern bank of Long
Lake with opportunities to enjoy the scenery, wildlife and access recreation opportunities such as
birdwatching, fishing spots, the City’s Summit Beach Park and access to the walking trails with
in the Woodrill SNA.
2. Bicycling- the new trail will provide bicyclists a safe travel way along the eastern bank of Long
Lake. The trail will provide an off-street facility connecting to the Wayzata Blvd Trail and Luce
Line State Trail to the south and the popular County Road 6 on road route as wells as planned
north –south regional bikeways. This trail segment has the support of Three Rivers Park District
as it provides a section of an identified north/south connection need.
3. Mountain Bicycling- users will be able to use the facilities and trail for exercise as an extension
of the Luce Line State Trail.
4. In-line Skating- in-line skaters will also be able use the adjacent Summit Beach Park as a
trailhead or break area. They will also be able to connect to the Luce Line State Trail.
Revised 11/2018
5. Fishing- anglers will benefit from the project by providing safe ADA access to fishing locations
all along the eastern edge of Long Lake.
6. Canoeing- the existing canoe launch will be renovated to be more user friendly and accessible by
widening the access point and improved grades.
6C) Will this project provide year round trail use? If it is planned to provide year round use, outline
which users indicated above will benefit and how the facility will be maintained for those uses.
Yes, the trail will be available for year round use. The City will add the trail to the snow and ice removal
program during the winter months.
7) PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
Provide a description sufficient enough to understand the project. Indicate prominently whether this is
primarily a new trail or facility development request, an enhancement to an existing trail or facility, or an
acquisition. Make sure to include the design specifics of the project, such as the trail width (paved multi-
use bicycle/pedestrian trails must be at least 10 feet wide). Include how this project will be
immediately available for use by the general public. If this project is a phase of a larger project, very
briefly describe how it fits into the larger plan, however, focus specifically on how the grant funds will be
used for this project. Also, briefly explain why it is important for this project to be funded. Use the box
below.
The project will convert the existing roadway to a bike trail. This will include the removal of the existing
asphalt, stabilizing the lakeshore where required, construction of a 10ft wide multipurpose trail and
adding some amenities such as benches, rock fishing points, canoe launch and interpretive signage.
The project lies on the path of a planned regional trail as outlined in the Hennepin county 2014 Bicycle
Transportation plan.
It is important that the project be funded as this is a unique opportunity to convert a municipal roadway
along a lakeshore on a planned regional trail route that connects several natural and recreational
opportunities together. The reduction in impervious area and the addition raingardens will also improve
Long Lake’s water quality.
The proposed multi-use trail corridor is also an excellent birding location. The area provides a wide
variety of habitat for a large number of bird species. The provided improvements will better educate,
preserve and enhance bird watching opportunities by adding interpretive signage, reducing impervious
surface and removing vehicular traffic along the eastern edge of Long Lake.
Revised 11/2018
8) PROJECT COST BREAKDOWN:
Identify each recreational trail/facility being proposed for funding. Provide a short quantitative
description of the facility (linear feet, dimension of structures, number of components, etc.), the total
estimated cost and the expected completion date for each for just this grant request. Include materials,
landscaping, design/engineering services, contract service, etc. Add or delete rows in the text boxes below
as appropriate. For acquisition projects, fill out the acquisition table below.
Trail/Facility Description Estimated
Cost
Expected
Completion
Date
Trail
Mobilization $ 18,000
Clearing And Grubbing $ 5,000
6,000 Square Yard of Bituminous Pavement
Removal.
$ 72,000
1 Each, Box Culvert (12'x6') $ 60,000
3000 Square Yards of 10' Wide Bituminous
Trail
$ 66,000
Landscaping $ 20,000
Trail Heads Parking (North End) $ 2,500
2 Informational Kiosks, one at each end of the
trail
$ 16,000
Stormwater
Improvements
2,000 feet of Shoreline Stabilization $ 55,000
800 Square Feet of Raingardens to gather and
treat runoff from the hillside adjacent the trail
area.
$ 12,000
Amenities 3 Interpretive Signs $ 3,600
3 Stone Fishing spots $ 6,000
3 Benches $ 6,000
Administration
(20%)
Design, Engineering, and Construction
Management
$ 68,420
Total $ 410,520
ACQUISITION (if applicable):
Description of Parcel Acres or Miles of Trail Reasonable
Market
Value
Estimate
Expected
Acquisition
Date
Total $
Revised 11/2018
9) PROJECT LOCATION MAP:
Revised 11/2018
10) PROJECT SITE LEVEL MAP:
Revised 11/2018
11) SITE AND PROJECT QUALITY:
What considerations have been given to the needs of the intended trail user groups and are they
appropriate for the location? What attractive features exist on site or within view of the proposed project
that may bring in potential user groups to this project location? What other facilities (if any) are on site or
within the trail corridor that enhances this project? Describe what attractive features exist on the site or
within view. Use the box below.
The project provides a multimodal trail for the benefit of hikers and bikers alike. For hikers the project is
bordered by scenic Long Lake to the west and wetlands to the east. Soon a large parcel adjacent to the
project will be incorporated into the Wood-Rill SNA offering a connection point to the Wood-Rill trail
network. The Wood-Rill SNA is an outstanding Sugar Maple “Big Woods” forest. For bikers the project
provides and safe pathway connecting to Wayzata Blvd Trail and Luce Line Trail in south with Spring
hill road and CSAH 6 to the north (both popular bicycle routes). The connection of the trail at the
southern end with the City’s Summit Beach Park provides a great jumping off point for either group with
parking, restrooms, swimming beach, picnic areas, fishing, birdwatching and hammocking. The City
currently had $103,000 worth of improvements planned for Summit Beach Park in conjunction with this
trail project.
12) PROJECT READINESS:
What is the current status of the project? Can the project begin immediately? What major activities must
still be accomplished before the project can begin? Will the project be completed within the appropriation
timelines? At a minimum, please reference land acquisition requirements, status of engineering/design,
and relevant permits and approvals that have/have not been obtained for the project. Is there urgency to
move ahead with this project now, and what consequences are looming if it is not funded? Use the box
below.
A design concept is complete for the project. Upon confirmation of funding, detailed design and
engineering will be completed and construction started. Should this grant be awarded the design will be
completed summer 2019, the project sent out for bid in the winter of 2019 and construction will begin and
be completed in 2020. The road way that will be transitioned to a trail was closed to motor traffic in
2018. The area is already being used by walkers, bikers, anglers and bird watchers but is currently not
well suited for these activities due to the severe level of deterioration of the existing road pavement.
13) ACCESSIBILITY (ADA):
All facilities that are developed, or portions thereof, using these funds must be accessible for persons with
disabilities or be eligible for an exemption. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) has developed
guidelines for outdoor developed areas, buildings and facilities and is available at www.access-board.gov.
Will the project facilitate and/or improve ADA access to existing trails or trail related facilities? Describe
how the trail or facility is designed for use by persons of all abilities and takes into consideration ADA
design standards. Do not just state the trail will be ADA compliant. If your project will not be ADA
accessible, list the specific exemption permitted in ADA guidelines. Use the box below.
Yes, the project will meet ADA guidelines for trails and trailheads. The trail will be constructed on the
existing road bed which is already within the acceptable running slope standards and has sufficient width
to meet clear tread width and cross slope standards. In addition, all proposed amenities such as the
fishing nodes, interpretive signs, kiosks, picnic tables and viewing platforms will be accessible to all
users. Summit Beach Park at the southern end of the project site already has a ADA accessible toilet and
parking. The City of Orono does have and follows an ADA transition plan, uses ADA complaint
standard details for construction projects and is committed to ensure our public facilities are as widely
accessible as possible.
14) CONNECTIVITY:
14A) Describe how the trail project will connect multiple destinations and/or communities. Use the box
below.
Revised 11/2018
The trail facilitates connections between Orono, Long Lake and Medina. In particular the trail provides
safe bicycle transportation between downtown Long Lake and County Road 6 which is a major east-west
on street bicycle corridor adjacent to the northeast end of the project.
14B) Does the trail project connect directly to an
existing state or regional trail? Check all that apply to
the right and describe in the box below if applicable.
Connects to Designated and
Existing State Trail: Indirectly
Connects to Designated and
Existing Regional Trail:
The trail connects to the Luce Line via the Wayzata Blvd trail that is currently under construction and the
shared street bikeway on Old Long Lake road.
14C) Does the trail project connect
directly to an existing state park, state
recreation area, regional park, high
quality natural resource, local recreation
area, or local park? Check all that apply
to the right and describe in the box below
if applicable.
Connects Directly to a State Park or State
Recreation Area: YES
Connects Directly to a Regional Park or
Regional Recreation Area:
Connects Directly to a Local Park or
Recreation Area: YES
Connects Directly to a High Quality
Natural Resource (not included above): YES
The trail will abut to the Woodrill SNA directly with the inclusion of 900 Old Long Lake road (scheduled
in 2020). There is an existing trail leading from the project area into Woodrill that would allow further
access to the entire hiking trail network.
The project connects to the City’s Summit Beach Park along the corridors southern edge.
The project runs along the shore of Long Lake.
The Project connects to the Wayzata Blvd Trail which in turn connects to the Luce Line Trial.
14D) Describe how the trail project contributes to the overall connectivity of the trail system in the area.
Specifically, how well does the project connect existing trail networks or fill critical gaps within the trail
system? How well does the project help promote connectivity among trail networks statewide? Use the
box below.
The trail is along a planned regional bike trail route per the Hennepin County
and Three Rivers Park District 2040 Bicycle Transportation Plan. See figure.
The project is along a key north south corridor connecting the Luce Line in
the South and County Road 6 in the North. The Wayzata Blvd Trail will be
complete in 2019 as part of the Hwy 12 Turnback Project. It provides an
additional east west connection tying to the Luce Line in the east/south and
the Independence Trail in the west.
15) NATURAL RESOURCE IMPACT:
Describe the potential impact to natural resources by the project and efforts to avoid or mitigate adverse
effects. This includes considerations for trail design and construction practices, noise, odors, dust control
measures, surface erosion, fish and wildlife populations, damage to wetlands or other ecologically
sensitive natural resources, landscaping that includes native planting, and historical/archaeological sites.
Also, demonstrate the compatibility of the proposed project with existing adjoining land uses. To the
Revised 11/2018
extent possible, all landscaping or plantings that are done in the project area must be native to Minnesota
and preferably of the local ecotype, and describe below how this project will comply with this
requirement.
Development of the trail will have a positive impact to the surrounding natural resources. There will not
be negative impacts on existing shoreline or wetland areas as the trail will stay within the existing
roadway right-of-way. One of the key drivers for the project is to improve the surface water quality going
into Long Lake. By transitioning the project area from a road to a multimodal trail we will be able to
install rain gardens and other plant material to accept the runoff coming from the abutting slopes, address
shoreline erosion issues and restore ½ of the current paved area with native plantings (Grasses, plants and
trees).
The compatibility of the trail to the adjacent existing land uses is ideal.
Long Lake- The trail corridor is adjacent to the east side of Long Lake for its entire length. This regional
destination for water recreation is only enhanced by adding compatible passive and active recreation
opportunities along its edge.
Summit Park Beach- This Orono City park along the southern end of the corridor will serve as a
wonderful trailhead for the multi-use trail. The park has amenities that will utilized by a variety of
visitors including, parking, ADA restroom, picnic tables, swimming beach and canoe launch.
Wood-Rill SNA- Soon this natural area will be expanding to abut the proposed trail corridor. This
adjacent land use will be an excellent opportunity to expand outdoor education and recreation in the
region. Wood-Rill has existing hiking trails, a Sugar Maple forest, swamps, sedge meadows and parking.
County Road 6 (to the north) & Luce State Line (to the south)- The trail is along a planned regional bike
trail rout per the Hennepin County and Three Rivers Park District 2040 Bicycle Transportation Plan,
making the multi-modal trail corridor an ideal project for alternative modes of transportation and exercise.
Revised 11/2018
ATTACHMENT CHECKLIST
REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS (All attachments MUST be 8 ½ by 11 ONLY)
Attachment A – Required Certifications
The first signature block is to be signed by the proper authority for the grant applicant.
The specific manager of the facility that is being rehabilitated, enhanced or developed
should sign the second section. If the proposed project will utilize public land that is not
under the jurisdiction of the grant applicant, the proper authority must sign the final
section in order to assure that they are both aware and supportive of the project.
Attachment B – Resolution Supporting Application
The application must be accompanied by either a copy of a resolution, council minutes
or some other official documentation that demonstrates that the local unit of government
supports the proposed project and the consequent application. The resolution does not
need to have a specific form or specific language, as long as it satisfies what was
outlined in the previous sentence. A sample resolution has been included. The sample
resolution is a combination type resolution example. It shows support of the grant
application (as required above), and if the project is awarded, it includes language to
support accepting the grant award, names the fiscal agent, and states that the facility or
trail will be maintained for no less than twenty years. This combination resolution helps
eliminate the need for an additional resolution for this project in the future, if awarded a
grant.
ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS (if applicable)
Attachment C – Letters of Support
Letters of support are an important factor for reviewers when selecting projects. There
should be an effort to solicit letters from specific groups that will derive a direct benefit
from the project. The applicant is also welcome to provide letters of support from all
other sources as well.
NA
Attachment D – Transportation Funding Award Letter
If this project is scheduled to receive Federal Transportation funds, then your local
MnDOT district should have notified you in some manner. Please attach this
notification and fill in the year in which you are scheduled to receive the funding under
question 3.
Revised 11/2018
Attachment A – REQUIRED CERTIFICATIONS
Complete the Required Certifications form below with original signatures.
For Grant Applicants:
“I hereby certify that all of the information provided in this application is true and accurate to the best of
my knowledge. I recognize that in the event of the proposed project being funded, this document will be
used as an addendum to the agreement between the sponsoring unit of government and the state to guide
project scope and reimbursement. I also acknowledge that all work must be completed by June 30, 2021,
and no reimbursement will be sought for an in-house labor services and/or to meet existing payroll. I also
preliminarily agree with plans to develop the proposed trail related project on land administered by my
agency.”
Name: Adam T. Edwards
Title: Director of Public Works/
City Engineer
Unit of Government: City of Orono
Signature: Date:
For Trail and Park Administrators:
“I substantially agree that the proposed trail related project will be mutually beneficial to the local
community, as well as to the goals and purposes for which this recreation unit was established. I will
cooperate in its provision if the project proposal should be funded.”
Name: Adam T. Edwards
Title: Director of Public Works/
City Engineer
Unit of Government: City of Orono
Signature: Date:
For All Administrators of Public Lands Crossed/Utilized in the Proposed Linkage (Required only if
the proposed project will utilize public land that is not under the jurisdiction of the grant applicant):
“I preliminarily agree with plans to develop the proposed trail related project on land administered by my
agency, and I will cooperate in seeking more formal authorization in the event the project proposal is
authorized for reimbursement.”
Name:
Title:
Unit of Government:
Signature: Date:
Revised 11/2018
Attachment B – RESOLUTION SUPPORTING APPLICATION
Revised 11/2018
Attachment C – Letters of Support
Revised 11/2018
PARK COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM
Prepared By: Reviewed By: Approved By:
Item No.: 7 Date: March 4th, 2019
Item Description: Tree Grant / Inventory
Presenter: Adam T. Edwards, P.E.
Dir, Public Works/City Engineer
Agenda Section: Staff Reports
1.Purpose. The purpose of this item is to inform the commission of the award and proposed plan for
the Hennepin County Tree Grant.
2.Background. Hennepin County Forestry division initiated a new grant this year under their healthy
tree canopy program. Orono City staff submitted an application for funds to assist in a tree inventory.
A $5000 grant was awarded. An inventory of city trees is a prerequisite in planning for and making
sound management decisions with respect to tree disease and pest mitigation.
3.Project Scope. This grant is to fund a tree inventory on city owned property including parks.
4.Cost. The grant requires a match. The city's match includes staff time, software licensing, supplies
and partial funding an arborist. The grant will fund an arborist to complete the inventory. Cost to the
city is estimated at $5000.
5.Funding. Funding for the city portion of the project will come from the Parks and Streets Operating
Budgets with the majority as in-kind staff time and software licensing.
6.Way Forward.
When What
March 2019 Solicit Arborist proposals / Quotes
April 2019 Award / Grant Agreement Signed
May -November 2019 Inventory trees
COMMISION ACTION REQUESTED
Information only.