Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Wetland delineation report
Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S.,W.D.C., P.W.S., A.F.S. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612) 802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com July 21, 2013 Ken Ronsberg Prestige Pools 87 West County Road C St. Paul, MN 55117 RE: Project Name: Anofte Pools 1560 Tanglewood Delineation Comm. No.: 2013-97 Project Location: City of Orono TI 18N, R23W, SW 1/4 of Section 26 Project Description: Wetland Delineation Report Dear Ken: As discussed, Jacobson Environmental, PLLC. (JE)visited the above referenced site to perform a official wetland delineation in accordance with the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual and the August 2010 Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation: Midwest Region. Adjacent site land use includes residential, wetlands, parklands and woodlands consisting of plants and trees typical of a woodland area. This parcel is a combination of a residential lot(Figure 6)with woodlands, and wetlands at the end of Tanglewood Road and north of County Road 6. Figure 1 is a site location map of the property. All figures referenced by this report are presented at the end of the text. The purpose of this study was to investigate the project area, identify areas meeting the technical criteria for wetlands, delineate the jurisdictional extent of the wetland basins and classify the wetland habitat. Maple-Basswood Forest Species Noted Riverine-Wet Meadow Species Trees Herbs Cottonwood Reed Canarygrass Box Elder Lake Sedge Basswood Green Ash Red Maple Shrubs Black Willow Shrubs Common Buckthorn Green Ash Prickly Gooseberry Herbs Ground Ivy Early Meadow Rue Kentucky Bluegrass Stinging Nettle White Snakeroot Virginia Waterleaf The growing season for this site is approximately from 4/15 to 10/15 where the air temperature averages above 28 degrees F. The growing season in 2013 appears to be late due to a cold weather pattern. Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Bunking-Functional Analysis-T&E Surveys 1 Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW's-Soil ID-Soil Analysis&Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond &Lake Weed Control & Fish Stocking-Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans c , Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S.,W.D.C., P.W.S.,A.F.S. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, IMN 55430 (612)802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com This site is in the big woods subsection ecoregion acco•ding to Minnesota DNR and the annual precipitation averages 30.44 inches. The presettlemen-:vegetation was maple-basswood forest in this area. The precipitation for the previous three months along with the comparison of the 6/24/13 precipitation worksheet data was as follows: May April March Worksheet(Wks) 4.27 5.58 2.44 30%less than 2.45 1.55 1.23 30% more than 4.10 3.12 2.05 2010 Wks Interpret Wet Wet Wet Multi-month score (3*3)+ (2*3)+ (1*3) = 18 Wet(15 to 18 being wet) The delineation was performed on June 24, 2013 and it is unlikely the precipitation totals in this period affected the boundary of any wetlands in this delineation, even though the period was wetter than normal. Precipitation data is located in Appendix A. This wetland delineation was performed and reported bar Wayne Jacobson, Minnesota Professional Soil Scientist#30611, Society of Wetland Scientists—Professional Wetland Scientist#1000, University of Minnesota/BWSR Wetland Delineator, Certified#1019, American Fisheries Society—Associate Fisheries Scientist#A-171. Methodology The wetlands on the subject property were delineated using the routine determination methodology set forth in the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Wetland boundaries were determined through a routine analysis of the vegetation soils and hydrology which must all show wetland characteristics in order for an area to be delineated as a wetland. Wetlands are areas that are saturated or inundated with surface and or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in hydric soil conditions. Examples of wetlands include seasonally flooded basins, floodplain forests, wet meadows, shallow and deep marshes, shrub swamps,wooded swamps, fens, and bogs. Vegetation The plant species within the parcel were catalogued and assigned a wetland indicator status according to the North American Digital Flora: National Wetland Plant List, version 2.4.0 (hMos.-1 wetland plants.usace.army.mil). U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 2009. Wetland Del ineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Bi3nking-Functional Analysis-T& E Surveys 2 Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW's-Soil ID-Soil Analysis& Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond &Lake Weed Control &Fish Stocking-Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S., W.D.C., P.W.S., A.F.S. ---------------------------------------------------------•--------------------------------------------------- 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612)802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com In the text of this report and on the enclosed data forms, the plant indicator status follows the plant's scientific name unless a status has not been assigned. The hydrophytic plant criterion is met when more than 50 percent of the dominant species by the 50/20 rule for each stratum(herb, shrub/sapling, tree, and woody vine)were assigned an obligate(OBL)', facultat ve wet(FACW), and/or facultative(FAC)wetland status. With the 50/20 rule, dominants are generally measured by absolute%cover in each stratum which individually or collectively account for more than 50%of total vegetative cover in the stratum, plus any other species which itself accounts for at least 20% of the total vegetative cover. Soils A hydric soil is a soil formed under conditions of saturation, flooding, or ponding long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the ipper part. If a soil exhibits the indicators of a hydric soil or is identified as a hydric soil the hydric soil criterion is met. The break between hydric and non-hydric soils was determined by excavating soil pits along transects crossing the wetland/upland eco-tone and evaluating the soil colors, textures, and presence or absence of redoximorphic indicators (i.e., mottles, gley or oxidized rhizospheres). Hydric Soil Indicators for the Midwest Region were noted as presented in the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States version 7.0(USDA NRCS 2010)if present at each sample point. Also, upper soil profiles were compared to the mapped or inclusionary soil series found in the sample area for soil identification purposes. Cautions used in applying the Field Indicators of Hydric Soils There are hydric soils with morphologies that are difficult to interpret. These include soils with black, gray, or red parent material; soils with high pH; soils high or low in content of organic matter; recently developed hydric soils, and soils high in iron inputs. In some cases we do not currently have indicators to assist in the identification of hydric soils in these situations. As long as the soil meets the definition of a hydric soil, the lack of an indicator does not preclude the soil from being hydric. The indicators were developed mostly to identify the boundary of hydric soil areas and generally work best on the margins. Not all of the obviously wetter hydric soils will be identified by the indicators. Redoximorphic features are most likely to occur in soils that cycle between anaerobic(reduced)and aerobic(oxidized)conditions. Morphological features of hydric soils indicate that saturation and anaerobic conditions have existed under either contemporary or former hydrologic regimes. Where soil morphology seems inconsistent with the landscape, vegetation, or observable hydrology, it may be necessary to obtain the assistance of an experienced soil or wetland scientist to determine whether the soil is hydric. 'OBL=Obligate Wetland,occurs an estimated 99%in wetlands. FACW=Facultative Wetland,has an estimated 67%-99%probability of occurrence in wetlands. FAC=Facultative, is equally likely to occur in wetlands and non- wetlands,340/6-66%probability. FACU=Facultative Upland,occurs in wetlands only occasionally, 1%-23% probability. UPL=Upland,almost never occurs in wetlands,<1%probability.NI=No Indicator,insufficient information available to determine an indicator status. Positive or negative sign previously indicated a frequency toward higher (+)or lower(-)frequency of occurrence with an category. Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-&inking-Functional Analysis-T&E Surveys 3 Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW's-Soil ID-Soil Analysis&Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond &Lake Weed Control &Fish Stocking-Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S., W.D.C., P.W.S.,A.F.S. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612)802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com To clarify on some Hennepin County sites, 1. Many of these soils have black or gray parent materials 2. Many of the soils have a high organic matter content 3. The hydric soil margin is typically higher than the wetland boundary margin on the site 4. Not all of the obviously wetter soils will be identified by the indicators 5. Many of the hydric soils are Mollisols which are classic problem hydric soils in many cases Hydrology The presence of current wetland hydrology was determined through direct observation of free water in the excavated soil pit, saturated soil conditions or soil redoximorphic features. However, the effect of on-or off-site hydrologic alterations may not always fully be accounted for when routine delineation methods are used. Wetland Classification Wetland classifications discussed in the text are set forth in Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States(FWS/OBS Publication 79/31, Cowardin et al. 1979)and Wetlands of the United States (USFWS Circular 39, Shaw and Fredine, 1971.)Additionally, plant community types as named by Eggers and Reed (1998)are given. Topographic maps, National Wetlands Inventory maps, the Web Soil Survey, Aerial Photographs, and DNR Protected Waters maps were consulted to locate potential wetland habitats. The Routine On-site Determination Method was used on this site. In this method, the following procedures were used: 1) The vegetative community was sampled in all present strata to determine whether 50% of the dominant plant species were hydrophytic using the 50/20 method. 2) Soil pits were dug using a dutch auger to depths of 18"40", noting soil profiles and any hydric soil characteristics. 3) Signs of wetland hydrology were noted and were compared to field criteria such as depth to shallow water table and depth of soil saturation found in the soil pits. Wetland edges were marked with orange numbered pin flags. 4-foot wood lath marked with orange "wetland boundary"flagging tape or flagging tied on vecetation may be used if site conditions warrant. Any wetlands were mapped by others using modem survey methods. At least one sample point transect crosses each delineated wetland edge. These transects consist of an upland sample point, and a wetland sample point. Other sample points may be located in areas which have one or more of the wetland vegetation, soils, or hydrologic characteristics present, or where questionable conditions exist. Sample points are marked with orange pin flags with a pink ribbon tied on them. Sample data sheets are found in Appendix B. Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Banking-Functional Analysis-T& E Surveys 4 Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW's-Soil ID-Soil Analysis & Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond &Lake Weed Control & Fish Stocking-Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S., W.D.C., P.W.S.,A.F.S. ---------------------------------------------------------•--------------------------------------------------- 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612)802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@msn.com Results Basin 1 Basin 1 is a R3UB Type Riverine basin comprised of 10% reed canarygrass, and 2% lake sedge along with a few other species. The wetland boundary was typically a transition from kentucky bluegrass to reed canarygrass with a topographic break. The soils changed from dry Lester soil to saturated Hamel soil in the wetland. Soil saturation was present in the wetland, and hydrology disappeared in the upland. Basin 2 Basin 2 is a PEMB Type 2 wet meadow comprised of 93% reed canarygrass, and 10%open water with a few other species. The wetland boundary was typically a transition from kentucky bluegrass to reed canarygrass with a topographic break. The soils changed from dry Lester soil to saturated Hamel soil in the wetland. Soil saturation was present in the wetland, and hydrology disappeared in the upland. Basin 3 Basin 3 is a R3UB Type Riverine basin comprised of 10% reed canarygrass, and 2% lake sedge along with a few other species. The wetland boundary was typically a transition from kentucky bluegrass to reed canarygrass with a topographic break. The soils changed from dry Lester soil to saturated Hamel soil in the wetland. Soil saturation was present in the wetland, and hydrology disappeared in the upland. The National Wetland Inventory Map(NWI)(Figure 2)identifies a large PFO1 B wetland on the north of the subject site, but not on site. According to the DNR Protected Waters Map(PWI)(Figure 4)of Hennepin County there is a protected public watercourse which comprises Basin 1 and Basin 3 on the site. Figure 5 shows the jurisdictional wetlands present on-site. Figure 6 is a parcel map of the area. According to the Web Soil Survey(Figure 3)the following hydric soils existed on the parcel: Hamel-Glencoe Photographs were taken of the site and some are included in Appendix C. Confirmation of Jurisdictional Status We are submitting this report to the client and regulatory agencies to request a wetland boundary and type determination. We have enclosed an official WCA Approval of Wetland Type and Boundary form in Appendix D along with a USCOE wetland delineation concurrence request. Wetland Del ineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-B;3nking-Functional Analysis-T& E Surveys 5 Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW's-Soil ID-Soil .Analysis & Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond &Lake Weed Control &Fish Stocking-Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans Jacobson Environmental, PLLC www.jacobsonenvironmental.com Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S., W.D.C., P.W.S.,A.F.S. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612) 802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenvOmsn.com Conclusion This wetland delineation meets the standards and criteria described in the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual and the August 2010 Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation: Midwest Region. This was a Routine On Site Determination and the results reflect the conditions present at the time of the celineation. If any wetland impacts are planned for this project, permits would be necessary from the LGU (Minnehaha Creek Watershed District)and other agencies. I certify that I reviewed the field analysis and wrote the report for this wetland delineation. Thank you for the opportunity to provide wetland services on this important project. Way46 E. Jacobson Date Professional Soil Scientist#30611 Professional Wetland Scientist#1000 Wetland Delineator, Certified#1019 Associate Fisheries Scientist#A-171 Jacobson Environmental, PLLC. Regulators: Wes Boll, Wenck Associates and MCWD Melissa Jenny, USCOE Lynda Peterson, BWSR Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-B,3nking-Functional Analysis-T&E Surveys 6 Phase I Environmental Assessments-EAW's-Soil ID-Soil Analysis&Delineation-Environmental Referrals Pond &Lake Weed Control & Fish Stocking-Tree Surveys-Natural Resource Management Plans FIGURES r Soil Map—Hennepin County,Minnesota Figure 3 Soils Map Map Unit Legend Hennepin County,Minnesota(UN053) Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI L2202 Lester loam,morainic,12 to 18 6.5 71.2% percent slopes,eroded L24A Glencoe loam,depressional,0 0.1 1.6% to 1 percent slopes L132A Hamel-Glencoe,depressional, 2.5 27.2% complex,0 to 3 percent slopes Totals for Area of Interest 9.2 100.0% r,\ Natural Resources V*b Snit Survey 7/17/2013 i Conservation Service National Co operatiw3 Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 ISW 1P J' CESfYVE /� `n`^ TS�YT MEIN\l1 f � 1 • 31 '' �. ..._ L 17 3� - � 1 LOM(.LAKF. s I 'i 9�3`. Io�Sw � � �� h ifj3•✓ '+ � N1�. tsw ►�!P '9 0 `c 92.3w 33 � LAM 9YOW r�vl ImJ D' 7 Q r " I -�ITII IA ES R RYSIAL Ar on.. s .o•. ,ti ,glSw 'y •�-- y _ lw ISR• 1q L •Y r _ 7 A .wro - rwr low A Figure 4 DNR Public Waters Inventory Map— Hennepin County TN Jacobson Environmental, PLLC Approximate Scale 1" =5,280' Project No. 2013-97 Figure 1 Site Location Map 93035..000'W 93034.000'W 93033.000'W WGS84 93032.000'W r City I-Pit Ln 1 f ) O .k • 1 J \.... i t[ r pro r H, No1� Na v o p • r i CheroV .40berhill Rd-1 kee ` dkRd r ..riot *is rwt� rwA � Lake 4(� -c Rd r ,rivee�ay - NN ;Ji. DriVewa r i C f z 0 r�7 ,f r ( l2Cti r - 25 0 C; '• Trin"sty,..h(r ---'� o �, Ions Z S?7E e'1,,, -Y<it.tr �' . . xu1; 'r o . ` Ln ° STAIrri• Jf�T •I' 4 RAN CR Of- 13 Damel's -- .� 0o Cir :• �. R a r T t t t d�a�� IOOd�� o of G+' •�` .'i _ t S Q- p Ln •_ _ J Ln v =r•'_ r ... so: �. , _,X ( j 12 •' ' L0�:,Vii. v . ,app �'•�'_ , '.�^O.� . / -•� - ��.,�-_..•�r�..�.r..r. �. = D •' ,/• � ` ;fir '�pM �'� �.^'n --�."�.t``_ � •�� �W�Zdfa Bly' w 1 Jl • .•/�.t....vat! 'Y f� :• ., �'i-'r - woo . �� .o� � ' -J(u �.., t�� -Ave �• -- � -'- - r t� ®' Geog K'-© 93035.000'W 93'34.000'W 93033.000'W WGS84 93032.000'W NATIONAL L s TM " GEOGRAPHIC �— ,� -, r-, �0'h° •0 0.5 mile 0.0 0.5 1.0 km 07/17J13 ' `* r Figure 2 NWI Map S. Fish t Wildlife Service National Wetlands Inventorev r Jul 17,2013 Wetlands F•Er.l=- I c. Freshwater Emergent - °rwiwater FOres:e7lSh'tlb Eswanne arta Marine Deepwater cstuanne ahs Vanne ^resnwater Pon.- tib _ate Other tr. `t+ t. This map Is for general reference only.The U8 Fish and Wildlife SamIce is not responsible for the aecurwy or currentness of the bpm data shown on this map.All weesndo meted dote should be used In accordance with the foyer matadata found on User Remarks: the Wetlands Mapper web site. 3 Soil Map—Hennepin County,Minnesota (Figure 3 Soils Map) a � 455610 455640 455670 455700 455730 455760 455790 455820 455850 455880 45°0'1"N ;7 j 45°0 1"N all + +i 1. , * .jt. s. ■ i P 1� M 44°55 54"N l .: .i�' - _ `j 44°59'5#'N 3 455610 455640 455670 455700 455730 455760 455790 455820 455650 4�_g80 Map Scale:1:1,400 6 printed on A landscape(11"x 8.5°)sheet N 0 20 40 80 120rs R At 0 50 100 200 300 Map pno ecton:Web Mercator Comermordinates:WG584 Edge tis:UTM Zone 15N WGS84 LSD,,, Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 7/17/2013 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3 r I — - - --- Figure 5 Wetland Delineation Map -- _ CERTWMTE OF GURNEY =77- $g LOT 3 �Y 1 \.+�`�� °^ ✓ i J �' `j G. `�` - •� LOT : --- � MORW�lypp TNWILN0.�C IWPD > �\ 1 Wl NPAyprt 1�• rINJAC Z mm- GAIT 9Q rt / j � ptlVIV.TYAIIf/.O.,Or!O.rt `� / PyIY.'P�rt fAVtltA4ArA�lO.rt �g�+ � w«f iC+l6 1' X01 ,., mMr 7, K�fyM LLY.fG3 A,.AiH� R Cl a. M.a w +wm POVARED FM _ m®lv.o/uan PERFORMANCE POOL&SPA Hennepin County GIS -Printable Map Page 1 of 1 _ Interactive Property Maps Fi ure 6 Property Aerial MapMap I , r` a" 1 kp Qa nn`vq iF y � f ( t� Parcel 26-118-23-32-0012 A-T-B: Torrens Map Scale: V=100 ft. N ID: Print Date:7/17/2013 Owner D C Buhman&T Y Buhman Market $782,000 Name: Total: Parcel 1560 Tanglewood Rd Tax $9,790.74 Address: Orono, MN 55356 Total: (Payable:2013) Property , p Residential Sale $815,000 Type: Price: This ma is p a compilation of data from various Home- sources and is furnished"AS IS"with no Non-Homestead Sale representation or warranty expressed or stead: Date: 08/2011 implied,irx;luding fitness of any particular purpose,merchantability,or the accuracy and Parcel 3.44 acres Sale completeness of the information shown. Area: 149,979 sq ft Code: Warranty Deed COPYRIGHT®HENNEPIN COUNTY 2013 http://gis.co.hennepin.mn.us/Property/print/default.aspx?C=455743.41709999973,4983012... 7/17/2013 APPENDIX A Precipitation Data •Precipitation Documentation Worksheet Using Gridded Database Page 1 of 2 Minnesota Climatology Working Group State Climatology Office - DNR Division of Ecological and Water Resources University of Minnesota home I current conditions I journal I past data I summaries I agriculture I other sites I contact us I search "- Precipitation Worksheet Using Gridded Database Precipitation data for target wetland location: county: Hennepin township number: 118N township name: Medina range number: 23W nearest community: Long Lake section number: 26 Aerial photograph or site visit date: Monday, June 24, 2013 Score using 1971-2000 normal period third prior first prior second prior month: (values are in inches) month: month: March May 2013 April 2013 2013 estimated precipitation total for this location: 0.00 0.00 0.00 there is a 30%chance this location will have less 2.57 1.26 1.20 than: there is a 30%chance this location will have more 4.01 2.76 2.12 than: type of month: dry normal wet dry dry dry monthly score 3 * 1 = 3 2 * 1 = 2 1 * 1 = 1 multi-month score: J- 6 (Dry) 6 to 9(dry) 10 to 14 (normal) 15 to 18(wet) Score using 1981-2010 normal period r third prior first prior second prior month: (values are in inches) month: month: March May 2013 April 2013 2013 estimated precipitation total for this location: T there is a 30%chance this location will have less 2.45 1.55 1.23 than: there is a 30%chance this location will have more 4.10 3.12 2.05 than: type of month: dry normal wet ¢� monthly score 3 http://climate.umn.edu/gridded_data/precip/wetland/w•z)rksheet.asp?passXutm83=456369&... 7/17/2013 HIgh DENsity radius retrieval 071210 Page 1 of 2 'Closest Station' Climate Data Retrieval The data matching your request is at the bottom of this page or should appear there within one minute. Target location is Lat: 44.99956 Lon: 93.55358 set location L retrieve only this station: 218300 TONKA ^--v years: 2012 v to 2013 J number of missing days allowed per month:13 1 retrieve data from the following data sources: Precipitation from High Density Network W Precipitation from National Weather Service _I Temperature from National Weather Service Snow from National Weather Service get monthly get daily useDNRhid: FalselTrue Target: lat 44.99956 lon 93.55358 mon year cc tttN rrW ss nnnn 00000000 pre aa.aaaa Tmx Tmn aaaaaa sno SnD dis Jan 2012 217935 .49 5 mi . Feb 2012 217935 1.73 5 mi . Mar 2012 217935 1.70 5 mi . Apr 2012 217935 2.96 5 mi . May 2012 217935 9.45 5 mi . Jun 2012 217935 3.55 5 mi . Jul 2012 217935 4.75 5 mi . Aug 2012 217935 1.50 5 mi . Sep 2012 217935 .30 5 mi . oct 2012 217935 1.35 5 mi . Nov 2012 217935 .85 5 mi . Dec 2012 217935 1.20 5 mi . Jan 2013 217935 .65 5 mi . Feb 2013 215838 .80 9 mi . Mar 2013 215838 2.44 9 mi . Apr 2013 215838 5.58 9 mi . May 2013 215838 4.27 9 mi . Jun 2013 215838 8.77 9 mi . Jul 2013 215838 m 9 mi . Aug 2013 m 999 mi . Sep 2013 m 999 mi . Oct 2013 m 999 mi . Nov 2013 m 999 mi. Dec 2013 m 999 mi. Where indicated: Missing values are shown as'm'. Days on which precip accumulated in the gage are shown as'-'. 'TTTT RR SS'is the'public land survey(PLS)'or'legal'location of the observed data. Section values greater 36 are SECTIC'TIC'locations plus 100. 'NWS ID'the National Weather Service Cooperative station number. Note that the'PLS'will always be correct for precipitation data while the'NWS ID'will always be correct for the temperature data. If no PLS info is supplied the the'NWS ID'number applies to all shown data. return to retrieval selection http://climate.umn.edu/HIDradius/radius.asp 7/17/'2013 APPENDIX B Sample Data Sheets WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Midwest Region Projecusite d&z — City/Cowty: 'Sampling Date: �V.&{It Applicant/Owner: 00-4 J12=4*04 State: AW Sampling Point--,j -� Investigator(s). IA=: Section,Township,Range:_ 1fa,Ti IgA1, J2 21111 Landform(hilsiope,terrace,etc.): Ij/L/�s_ _ Local refief(concave,convex,none): Slope(°rb): _ Let: Long:_ -s Lec41�_ Datum: Sod Map Unit Name: � NWI classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No_,.][, (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation (� Soil-,&L,or Hydrology--jhL significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? 'Yes�_ No_ Are Vegetation_ ,Soil_hL,or Hydrology_j%[ naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampting point locations,transects,important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes _ No Is the Sampled Area Wettand Hydrology Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks: VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indkcator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size:_�� cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species —2p p _ That Are DBL,FACW,or FAC; �_ (A) 2. S*�'� yk� 2 Total Number of Dominant 3. "' - '�� �a Species AcrossAl1 Strata: 4. 5 Percont of Dominant Species That Are DBL,FACW,or FAC: 3 (A/B) -�Q-=Total Cover Saplina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:�) Prevalence index worksheet: I _ Total%Cover of: Muttiokr bv: 2• OBL species x 1= 3. y FACW species x 2= 4. FAC species x 3= 5• FACU species x4= ! =Total Cover UPL species x5= Herb Stratum (Plot size ", — - �^ Column Totals: (A) (g) i--- 2. _ Prevalence Index =B/A= 3. _ Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. _ t-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5. _ _ 2-Dominance Test is>50% t3. _ _ 3-Prevalence Index is s3.0' 7. _ 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting e - data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) g _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) 10. 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must = Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: Total(:over be present,unless disturbed or problematic. - Hydrophytic 2. _ Vegetation =Total Cover Present? Yes No_- Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region-Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indi Bator or corifirrn the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) _ % Color(moist) %_ Tvoe Locr— Texture Remarks _ 'T e: C=Concentration,D=D lelion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. rlocation: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix. Hydric Soil indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': _ Histosol(Al) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16) Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Sandy Redox(S5) _ Dark Surface(S7) _ Black Histic(A3) _ Stripped Matrix(S8) _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12) _ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) _ Stratified Layers(A5) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) — Other(Explain in Remarks) _ 2 con Muck(A10) Depleted Matrix(0) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Redox Dark Surface(176) _ Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) 'Indicators of hydrophy(ic vegetation and _ Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _ Redox Depressions(F8) wetland hydrology must be present, _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(83) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Depth(Inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes_A_ No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one is eouired:check all that aooly) Secondary Indicators(minimum of two reauieed) _ Surface Water(A7) _ Water-Stained Leaves(69) _ Surface Soil Cracks(86) _ High Water Table(A2) _Aquatic Fauna(813) _ Drainage Patterns(670;1 _ Saturation(A3) _ True Aquatic Plants(B1-1) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2) _ Water Marks(Bt) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(CI) _ Crayfish Burrows(C8) _ Sediment Deposits(82) _ Oxidized Rhixospheres.n Living Roots(C3) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) _ Drift Deposits(83) _ Presence of Reduced Irm(C4) , Stunted or Stressed Plants(01) _ Algal Mat or Crust(134) _ Recent Iron Reduction In Tilled Soils(CO) _ Geomorphic Position(D2) _ Iron Deposits(85) _ Thin Muck Surface(C7) _ FAC-Neutral Test(D5) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(87) _ Gauge or Well Data(Don Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(BB) _ Other(Explain in RemarKs) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No�_ Depth(inches)• �-�•• Water Table Present? Yes No Depth('inches): _ Saturation Present? Yes No -r._ Depth(nches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No_,- includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),0 available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region—Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Midwest Region Project/Site: (3t's0�� �Ra--j City/County: dinad. Sampling Date:} Appllcant/Owner.__12:0.n '12.4*W� State: WA/ Sampling Point: Investigator(s): jyET Section,Township,Range: !Ice ,T) 15ri/. Je 20 Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): �_ Local relief(concave,convex,none): Slope(%): I Let: Long:_ Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: i ftdd�t _'NW classification: Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yea No_Y_ (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation_7W'Soil-W-,or Hydrology_,hL_significantly disturbed? Are'Normal Circumstances"present? Yes _ No_ Are Vegetation-_JSt,Soil-.OhL or Hydrology,A-naturally problematic? (N needed,explain any answers in Rema-ks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,Important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes- % No Hydric Soil Present? Yes_ L No Is the Sampled Aron Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes_-Ya-- No within a Wetland? Yes__)&_ No Remarks: a il4r6s t w 4y64-W 4- VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: a O�✓�./t.�,e %Cover Saeclea? Status Number of Dominant Species 1 That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3' Species Across All Strata: Z (13) 4. Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: gw (A/B) =Total Cover Sablina/Shfub Stratum (Plot size: Prevalence Index worksheet: 1• Total%Cover of: MUMMY bT 2• OBL spades x 1= 3. FACW spades x 2- 4. _ FAG species x 3- 6. FACU species x4= =Total Cover UPL species x5_ Herb Stratum (Plot size: �� Column Totals: 1 (A) (B) 2. �. _�/ - ��, Prevalence Index =B/A= 3. _ Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. - _ 1-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5. _ �.2-Dominance Test Is>50% 6. _ _ 3-Prevalence Index is S3.0' 7. _^T _ _ 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting t3 data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 9. Problematic Hydrophytlo Vegetation'(Explain) 10. ' _ - 'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must �t, Total Cover be present,unless disturbed or problematic. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: 510 1. -� Hydrophytic 2. Vegetation =Total Cover Present? Yes- No Remarks: (include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)��y v ��h►,e'Iv`sd� t1i+r0.�(,w�L Trym TY(vey(�✓ US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region-Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point:��✓��' Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indiloator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) %_ Tvne Loci Texture Remarks 'Type: C=Concentration,DaDe letion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. glocallon: PL--Pore Lining,6A=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': _ Histosol(At) _ Sandy Gieyed Matrix(S4) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16) — Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Sandy Redox(35) _ Dark Surface(87) _ Black Histle(A3) Stripped Matrix(88) _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12) _ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) _ Very Shallow Dark SLuface(TF12) _ Stratified Layers(A5) _- Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) r Other(Explain in Remarks) _ 2 cm Muck(A10) ,Z Depleted Matrix(F3) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface(Al 1) _ Redox Dark Surface(176) _ ThIcK Dark Surface(Al2) _.._ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Sandy Mucky Mineral(St) _ Redox Depressions(F8) wetland hydrology must be present, _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peal(S3) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(If observed): Type: Depth(Inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes_,Aa_ No__ Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one Is required:check all that aopiyl Secondary Indicators(minimum of two reouligd) _ Surface Water(Al) , Water-Stained Leaves(Bg) _ Surface Soil Cracks(BE) I;g High Water Table(A2) _ Aquatic Fauna(B73) _ Drainage Patterns(B10) -,i&Saturation(A3) ___. True Aquatic Planta(B14) ,-,_ Dry-Season Water Table(C2) _ Water Marks(Bt) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) _ Crayfish Burrows(C8) ;IL Sediment Deposits(82) _ Oxidized Rhizpspheres an Living Roots(C3) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(CSI) _ Drift Deposits(83) _ Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(01) _ Algal Mal or Crust(B4) _ Recent Iron Reduction In Tilled Soils(CO) Ie Geomorphic Position(02) _ Iron Deposits(85) , Thin Muck Surface(C7) FAC-Neutral Test(05) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) — Gauge or W*Q Data(D0r y,.. Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(BB) _ Other(Expiain In RemarKS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No 1c Depth(Inches): Water Table Present? Yes_� No Depth(indica): 12 Saturation Present? Yes_. No Depth(Indrell):_ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes _ No includes capillary frin a —'— Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial pho os,previois Inspections),If available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region-Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Midwest Region ProjectlSite: 3risp s�,)d.,iaJ QJ City1C111ty: 9?XW d, Sampling Date: } Applicant/Owner. �iirs v-6, p ��crAq State:,�_ Sampling Point: Investigator(,): t,JE"T Section,Township,Range:X7:1 ligr gy l Landform(hiiislope,terrace,etc.): Local relief(concave,convex,none): Slope(%): I _ Let: r Long:_ g Datum: Soil Map Unit Name:_ "gc:bl� MM classification: Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No-__Y_ (it no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation--ow,Soil_46L or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes jr, No Are Vegetation-_Aj,Soil_,61,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (if needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) - SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes_ IL No is the Sampled Area Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No sG within a Wetland? Yea No 1r-- Remarks: � ZS WAS S .�'j•,,,d,,b(�,Js..e��L _��, �_._� __ _ _ __ ___ __ _ _ VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size:_ �� r�/_y %Covej Specie=s? status Number of Dominant Species t. wT:t: �� ��� _IYAP_ _ P That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: �� (A) Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: (13) 4. Percent of Dominant Species 5' —T That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: (,uB) Sapling/Shrub CoverShrub Stratum (Plot size: , Prevalence Index worksheet: 1. Total%Cover of: Muitioly by 2. OBL spades x 1= 3. _ FACW species x 2= 4. _ FAC species x3= 6. FACU species x4= Total Cover UPL species X5= Herb Stratum (Plot size: Column Totals: (A) (B) 2. IF Prevalence Index =&A= 3. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. — 1-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5. _ _ 2-Dominance Test Is>60% S. — _ _ 3-Prevalence Index is 53.0' 7. — _ 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting 8. data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 9. —` _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) 10. _ --} Tolal Coves vindicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology mu:st Woody Vine Stratum (Piot size: 1 ii�s be present,unless disturbed or problematic. t' Hydrophytic 2. --t _ Vegetation =Total Cover Present? Yes No _ Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region-Version 2.0 SOIL x-vim Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the 6acator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features finches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) �% Tvo�o Texture Remarks 'Type: C=Concentralion,DaDe etion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS= asked Sand Grains. Zlocatlon: PL=Pore Uning,M=Matrix. — Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': _ Histosol(At) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(134) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16) _ Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Sandy Redox(S5) _ Dark Surface(57) _ Black Histo(A3) _ Stripped Matrix(Se) _ Iron-Manganese Masses t 712) — Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(171) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) _ Stratified Layers(A5) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) , Other(Explain In Remarks) _ 2 cm Muck(A10) � Depleted Matrix(F3) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Redox Dark Surface tF6) _ Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Sandy Mucky Mineral(St) _ Redox Depressions(F8) wetland hydrology must be present, _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peal(S3) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Depth(Inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes_,)C-- No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one Is reguired:check all that apply) 5econdary Indicalors(minimum of twojeaulredl _ Surface water(Al) _ Water-Stained Leaves(Bg) _ Surface Soil Cracks(BE) _ High Water Table(A2) _ Aquatic Faunq(B13) _ Drainage Pattens(610) _ Saturation(A3) _ True Aquatic Plants(B14) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2) _ Water Marks(81) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) _ Crayfish Burrows(C8) _ Sediment Deposits(132) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres cur Living Roots(433) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C3) _ Drift Deposits(83) _ Presence of Reduced iron(C4) , Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) _ Algal Mat or Crust(84) _ Recent Iron Reduction In Tilled Solis(CO) _ Geomorphic Position(D2) _ Iron Deposits(135) , Thin Muck Surface(C7) _ FAC-Neutral Test(05) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(07) _ Gauge or Way Data(Dg) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(BB) _ Other(Explalr)In Remarks) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No_X Depth(inches): Water Table Present? Yes,_y_ No Depth(iinches): 22 Saturation Present? Yes Jl No Depth(Inches):1_ Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No includes capillary fringe) Al— Describe Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring wail,aerial pho(os,previous Inspections),if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region—Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Midwest Region Projact/Site 1-Jr&y = ` City/County: At-Ad`_ Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner: y.. .1,&*AC State: Aly_ Sampling Point:--%-,--4AET- Investigator(s): JAZZ Section,Township,Range: Landform(hUlslope,terrace,etc.): _,r1i 911101-_.•t�� Local relief(concave,convex,none): Slope(%): _ Let: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: Howma1 NWi classification: PFM it Are climatic f hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of yf:ar? Yes No--_][, (If no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ,Soil or Hydrology,,j,significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes-jr, No Are Vegetation ,Soil or Hydrology-ONL naturally problematic? (H needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) - SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,Important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes _ c _ No Hydric Soil Present? Yes Ir-_ No Is the Samplod Area Weiland Hydrology Present? Yes�_ No -within a Wetland? Yes_)Q- No Remarks: VEGETATION—Use Scientific names of plants. If Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: 3a T4A-k %CoyX Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1 That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: _ (A) Total Number of Dominant 3. - Species Across All Strata: _ (Ij) 4. 5 "- Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 1 ov (,vB) =Total Cover Saoilna/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 1 S�rn.L•,.� —� Prevalence Index worksheet: 1 - Total%Cover of: Multiply bv: 2• - OBL species x 1= 3. - FACW spades x2- 4. 2- 4. - FAC species x3= 6. FACU species x4= Herb Stratum (Plot size: 3,11ew =Total Cover UPL spedes x5= 1, L011"1011 w ff Column Totals: (A) (g) 2. - _ Prevalence Index -B/A- 3• ?�. �' P44&pHydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4._ - 1-Rapid Test for Hydrophygc Vegetation 5. _ 2-Dominance Test Is>50% 6. 3-Prevalence Index is 53.0' ?• 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting e. —T - data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) g. —� _ Problematic Hydrophytlo Vegetation'(Explain) 10. Total Cover 'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: Ap -' * be present,unless disturbed or problematic. 1. ----Y Hydrophytic 2• _ Vegetation —}=Total Cover Present? Yes _ No Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) i US Army Corps of Engineers i Midwest Region-Version 2.0 $OIL Sampling Point: % Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indl•sator or confirm the absence of indicators.} Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Cow(moist) % Color(moist) _ % Tyoe' o` Texture Remarks �?� _�.'�'J�4/c �_ 7.st/ict.[•,/� _� �_�L._ ,re.—he yfr Type: C=Concentration,D=De etion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. 'Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: _ Histosol(A1) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A18) _ Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Sandy Redox(S5) _ Dark Surface(57) _ Black Hlatic(A3) _ Stripped Metrix(Se) _ Iron-Manganese Masses(F12) _ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Stratified Layers(A5) _-Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ 2 cm Muck(All 0) Depleted Matrix(F3) -_ Depleted Below Dark Surface(At 1) --'Redox Dark Surface(F8) _ Thick Dark Surface(Al2) _ Depleted Dark Surface(F7) 'indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Sandy Mucky Mineral(Si) _ Redox Depressions(Fe) wetland hydrology must be present, _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes—)Q— No__ Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minlmum gf one is reeuired:check all that apply)_ Secondary Indicators(minimum of two reouired) _)L-Surface Water(Al) _ Water-Stained Leaves(Bg) _ Surface 561 Cracks(BE) ,),-High Water Table(A2) _ Aquatic Fauna(1313) _ Drainage Patterns(1310) Saturation(A3) — True Aquatic Plants(81.1) _ Dry-Season Water Table(C2) _ Water Marks(B1) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(Cl) _ Crayfish Burrows(Ce) _ Sediment Deposits(82) _ Oxidized Rhizpspheres on Living Roots(C3) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial imagery(CSI) _ Drift Deposits(83) _ Presence of Reduced iron(C4) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(01) _ Algal Mat or Crust(84) _ Recent Iron ROduction in Tilled Soils(Ce) Geomorphic Position(C2) _ Iron Deposits(135) _ Thin Muck Suttace(C7) JL FAC-Neutral Test(05) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(87) _ Gauge or Wel,Data(D91 _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(BB) _ Other(Explain!In Remarks) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes_ No Depth(incheg): Water Table Present? Yea_ No Depth(inche$): +I Saturation Present? Yes - ,_ No Depth(Inches):_ L—_ Welland Hydrology Present? Yes_ No includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial pito os,prevloIs inspections),if available.- Remarks: vailable:Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region-Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Midwest Region Project/Site: I-Jr&O ,�_ city/County: ligillesA s Sampling hate: 42�_" Applicant/Owner:__0;p_4 A6,. ,,-d State:r Sampling Point:—1 rule_ Investigator(s): JAIA !' Section,Township,Range: 2 0 2:1 Isr t Landform(hlllslope,terrace,etc.): -� Local relief(concave,convex,none): Slope(%): 3 Let: Long;- Datum: Soil Map Unit Name; dam,/ NWI classification: Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this lime of year? Yes No--][, (If no,explain In Remarks.) Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology_,01SL significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes_-&_ No_ Are Vegetation ,Soil_�,or Hydrology_-naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,Important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No -within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks: I I �•6 f�JA>► � N y�fr�/o':,us!/ 1.1��}'�7.�:oy� VEGETATION—Use Scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: l0_,-fr■�J-_4jk °/ �$�v Specie_)? Status -�- - Number of Dominant Species t' �■ �iy�r...��► _ _ F.�G> That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3. - Species Across All Strata: (13) 4. Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: (AB) Total Cover Saplina/Shrub Stratum (Plot size:�) Prevalence Index worksheet: 1. Total%Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL spades x 1= 3. FACW species x2- 4. 2- 4. _ FAC species x3= 5. FACU s pecies x4= Herb Stratum (Plot sizer ----. =Total Cover UPL species x5= p` Column Totals: (A) (8) WWV 2. Prevalence Index =B/A= 3. _ Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. - 1-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5. ` 2-Dominance Test Is>50% 8. _ 3-Prevalence Index is 53.0' 7. —� _ 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting 8 - data in Remarks or on a seoa(ate sheet) g --" _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) 10. _ —� ?Dial Coves 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: mar j� 9v- be Present,unless disturbed or problematic. 1' --, - - Hydrophytic 2. _ Vegetation =Total Cover Present? Yea No„�- Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.) US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region-Version 2.0 t I SOIL 3 Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indi•:ator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth _ Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Tvner Loci Texture Remarks _ -ICAM Type: C=Concentration,D=De etion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. =Location: PL=Pore Lining LA=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: _ Hlstosol(Al) _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A18) Histic Eplpedon(A2) _ Sandy Redox(85) _ Dark Surface(S7) _ Black Histie(A3) _ Stripped Matrix(38) _ Iron-Manganese Masses(1712) _ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) ` Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) _ Stratified Layers(A5) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) _ Other(Explain In Remarks) _ 2 cm Muck(A10) _ Depleted Matra(F3) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Redox Dark Surface(178) _ Thick Dark Surface(Al2) — Depleted Dprk Surface(F7) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Sandy Mucky Mineral(Si) _ Redox Depressions(F8) wetland hydrology must be present, _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peal(S3) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators Iminimum of one Is reeuired:check all that agnly� Secondary I dicatom(minimum of two reeuired) _ Surface Water(Al) _ Water-Stained Leaves(09) _ Surface Soil Cracks(B6) _ High Water Table(A2) _, Aquatic Faun$(B13) _ Drainage Patterns(B10) — Saturation(A3) ^ True Aquatic Plants(B14) � Dry-Season Water Table(C2) _ Water Marks(B1) _ Hydrogen Sui(ide Odor(C1) _ Crayfish Burrows(C8) _ Sediment Deposits(82) _ Oxidized Rhizpspheres an Living Roots(C3) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) _ Drift Deposits(83) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) _ Algal Mat or Crust(54) _ Recent Iron Rgductlon In Tilled Solis(CO) _ Geomorphlo Position(02) _ Iron Deposits(85) _ Thin Muck Sufface(C7) _ FAC-Neutral Test(D5) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) _ Gauge or Weq Date(Dg i Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(BB) _ Other(Explaij In Remar<s) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No A_ Depth(Incherr): Water Table Present? Yes No_L_ Depth(inche ): Saturation Present? Yes No_3!�_ Depth(Inche ):��� + Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No (Includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial phorps,prevb-is Inspections).If available: Remarks: I US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region–Version 2.0 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Midwest Region Project/Site: 15'&y - City/Cou Ity: DrAbd. Sampling Date:. W2*_/15 Applicant/Owner:__0 'm .�{,+ State: AW Sampling Point: wgj: Investigator(a): JA= Section,Township,Range:�T/arm_ je 23L l if landform(hVlslgm,terrace,etc.): _± Local relief(concave,convex,none): Gsrs�. Slope(%):�_ Let: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name: ma-am I NWI classification: R3 wr Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No_,[, Of no,explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology_,hL significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes_&,_ No_ Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology-09-naturally problematio? (N needed,explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS— Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects,Important features,etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes_-]L_ No Hydric Soil Present? Yes_ - No Is the Sampled Area Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes-,k_ No within a Welland? Yes--)r,- No Remarks: S 404 jr .11.9jrlf VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants. Absoiutq Dominant indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size: leCover Saecie27 Status Number of Dominant Species 1 That Are 08L,FACW,or FAC: � (A) 2. Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: 4. ` Percent of Dominant Species That Are 08L,FACW,or FAC: _ I P� (,VB) =Total Cover Saniinaftsib Stratum (Plot size: =aa? --T Prevalence Index worksheet: 1. Total%Cover of., MUi 2U_12y: 2. 081.spades x 1= 3. _ FACW species x 2= 4. _ FAC species x 3= b- FACU species x4= =Total Cover UPL species x 5= Herb Stratum (Plot size: ___"�/yam Column Totals: 1. imp 2. Prevalence Index =B/A= 3. _ Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. - _ 1-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5. - 2-Dominance Test is>60% 6. 3-Prevalence Index is S3.0' 7. _ 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting 8 - data in Remarks or on a seoarate sheet) 9. _ _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain) 10. - 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: �1QY=Total Cover be present,unless disturbed or problematic. �®�V1.1s.olr 1 ---r - Hydrophytic 2. - Vegetation =Total Cover Present? Yes_L No Remarks: (include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)-G US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region-Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: -4iiL l Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) _ o _ -1,21!- LZ— Texture Remarks I-lit dry 'Type: C=Concentration.D=De letion,RM=Reduced Matrix MS=Masked Sand Grains. 'Location: PL_=Pore Lining M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': _ Histosol(A1) _ Sandy Glayed Matrix(S4) _ Coast Prairie Redox(A16) _ Histic Epipedon(A2) _ Sandy Redox(55) _ Dark Surface(S7) _ Black HIVID(A3) _ Stripped Matrix(SB) — Iron-Manganese Masses IF12) _ Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral(171) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) _ Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(172) _ Other(Explain in Remarks) _ 2 cm Muck(A10) x Depleted Matrix(F3) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) _ Redox Dark Surface(176) _ Thick Dark Surface(Al2) — Depleted Dark Surface(F7) 31ndleators of hydrophytie vegetation and _ Sandy Murry Mineral(Sl) — Redox Depressions(Fe) wettand hydrology must be present, _ 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Depth(Inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes-)C-_ No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one Is reeuir@ :check all that apply) Seco ndary indi t 4�.�(minimum of two renuq•ed — Surface Water(Al) _ Water-Stained Leaves(139) _ Surface Soil Cracks(BE) ji High Water Table(A2) _ Aquatic Fauna(B13) _ Drainage Patterns(510) Saturation(A3) __.. True Aquatic plants(131.1) Dry-Soason Water Table(C2) _ Water Marks(Bi) _ Hydrogen Su1(Ide Odor(Cl) _ Crayfish Burrows(C8) _ Sediment Deposits(B2) _ Oxidized Rhizpsphems on Living Roots(C3) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(Cil) _ Drift Deposits(83) _ Presence of Deduced iron(C4) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) _ Algal Mat or Crust(64) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(CO) _X Geomorphic Position(02) _ Iron Deposits(135) _ Thin Muck Sutface(C7) FAC-Neutral Test(05) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(87) ,_ Gauge or Well Data(DO► T Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(68) ` Other(Explain In Remarts) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No_� Depth(I nchei): Water Table Present? Yes_,V-- No Depth(inches}!: 2 Saturation Present? Yes X_ No Depth(inche*): D Wetland Hydrology Present? YesNo_ includes capillary fringe) -IXC— Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,prevlois Inspections),If available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region-Version 2.0 I APPENDIX C Site Photographs � � w � 4ryr1j ca . fi f s r qr,yr •.a.y �;•�' '�*c �;� ci€" r z:' `y+'ro �4?�-'. r. ww � � I APPENDIX D WCA Wetland Type and Boundary and USCOE Approval Forrris Minnesota • Conservation Act Application for Approval of Wetland Type and Boundary 1. Project/Site Information Project/Site Name: �56ao 7r Local Government Unit: 6 ;4 p K Location (address and/or T, R, Sec.): 2. Applicant Information Applicant Name: Aawl Dvbo,,,4 Address:15*6p City, State, Zip: 4p,_v,op E-mail: Phone: 3. Agent/Consultant Information Company Name (if applicable): -A"OAO�- &VWIW� f tact Person:�,�f�y,.,_ cods Address: JTg"Z H,"lp-UCity, State, Zip: E-mail: gPhone: J7'Y" D �l s,•1 a WJ 4. Description of Request Check all that apply: WWetland Boundary(must attach wetland delineation report) KWetland Type (Eggers & Reed and/or Circular 39 type) 5. Signature By signature below, the applicant requests a delermination from the Local Government Unit under Minnesota Rules 8420.0225 on the submitted wetland boundary and type information in this application. The applicant also affirms that they are the owner of the subject property or have permission from the landowner to pursue this determination. Applica or Auttloded Agent Signature Date Important Notes: • The applicant may be required to submit multiple copies of the report/information to the LGU. The LGU may require the applicant to submit copies directly to Technical Evaluation Panel Members. Check with your LGU regarding their submittal requirements. • The LGU decision must be made in compliance with Minnesota Statutes, section 15.99. For LGU use only Date Received: Page 1 of 1 BWSR Wetland Boundary/Type Application Form 11/10/08 Print Form U5 Army Corps of Engineers St.Paul District Request for Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Review Please enter the following general information about the property under review: Name of property owner U;art OLPJ9~ Property Address(No. & Street,City,State, Zip Code) 136v Ta I.,,,,�.I,t JZ.,a,,� D✓'v.+o lam/ 3-S33�o Lat. ° Long. (decimal degrees) CountyK Location: ;%W 1/4 ection 7_!p Township 11$;/Range 2341 Size of review area 3, 44- acre(s) By submission of this wetland delineation report I am requesting that the U.S. Arany Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District provide me with the following(check only one box): ❑ Wetland Delineation Concurrence. Concurrence with awetland delineation is a written notification from the Corps concurring, not concurring, or commenting on the wetland boundaries delineated on a property. Under this request, the Corps will not address the jurisdictional status of the wetlands on the property,only the boundaries of the resources within the review area. ® Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination. A prelin'inary jurisdictional determination is a non- binding written indication that there may be waters of the United States, including wetlands, on a parcel or indications of the approximate location(s)ofwaters ol'the United States or wetlands on a parcel. Preliminary jurisdictional determinations are advisory in nature and may not be appealed. ❑ Approved Jurisdictional Determination. An approved jurisdictional determination is an official Corps determination that jurisdictional waters of the United States or navigable waters of the United States, or both,are either present or absent on the property. An approved jurisdictional determination precisely identities the limits of those waters on the project site determined to be jurisdictional under the Clean Water Act or Rivers and I larbors Act. Approved jurisdictional determinations can be relied upon by the affected party for a period offive years. An approved jurisdictional determination may be appealed through the Corps' administrative appeal process. In order for the Corps to process your request, the wetland delineation must be prepared in accordance with the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual, any approved Regional Supplements to the 1987 Manual, and the Guidelines for Submitting Wetland Delineations in Minnesota and Wisconsin (http://www.i-nvp.usace.army.mil/regulatory/). Requestor_ Date__77A/ Name(typed) 1,4L_�—=�,�A�rr��•'TM�