Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
04-15-2019 Planning Commission Packet
PUBLIC ATTENDANCE MEETING DATE ‘"t---649 ❑ COUNCIL g PLANNING COMMISSION ❑ OTHER Assistive Listening Device available upon request. Pleas4e complete the follawirng`information forCity}records 4' $ .# y PRESENT FOR(from agenda) NAME (please print) ADDRESS NAME OR NUMBER 1. <w 14A - 00 GSW 2. a K.-. R/i /le4 kik) 4/1 17— 0 C9 oo 3. i9est;a0, 600.A.G Dov L.19 11 _0000zo 4. t� Il) (. (144 5. bac e).1 lac ck.A 6. , ,. , .� s Wit it- 1h' - . (/ 7. •� t (tit ' `G (- f -‘4 8. 9. l2_0 c, 04- 10. �Q% %14-/ 11. f,' /-- Z '2,65 `' 1 6--)3 - 12. -Vto0 � G �� Z - ZSU._ 1 ��� 13. � 11 �. l Y(/ ►►` 0T-2 2--0 14. ; V Uva. -�'"`'� 15. 4 �� v 1 k ����� 0 4 o(2 V:MLEGAL FOgM C;F TPUIEtA TEODANC OC/C` 4 ( j kk..,v(\k/ J �/ uV ` 1\ Uv 1� PUBLIC ATTENDANCE MEETING DATE ❑ COUNCIL PLANNING COMMISSION ❑ OTHER Assistive Listening Device available upon request. c°,. ( �6 f r o a. # .,:; 4 ,i.4" PRESENT FOR(from agenda) NAME (please print) ADDRESS NAME OR NUMBER 1. /11//t-1/,t- /8 6 G Cn d yt--/"o $ O S L4 r G IiD 2 2 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. V:\(LEGAL FORMS)\(FORMS)\PUBLIC ATTENDANCE.DOC WA/0 Agenda Planning Commission Meeting Monday,April 15,2019, 6:30 P.M. i, G. Orono Council Chambers,2780 Kelley Parkway, Orono,MN 55356 �.krsHov� 952-249-4600/www.ci.orono.mn.us Audience Members: Please sign in for the public record if you wish to address the Planning Commission. The sign in sheet is in the lobby. Memos regarding each of the Agenda items are available in the Public Packet—located in the lobby near the sign in sheet. Applicants will be asked to move to the lectern to answer questions after staff presents the application. The Planning Commission is an advisory body to the City Council. If action is taken on any items on this agenda,they will be scheduled for an upcoming City Council meeting. A quorum of the City Council may be in attendance of a Planning Commission meeting to hear comments made, though no action or deliberation of the Council will occur. Council Representative: Matt Johnson Pledge of Allegiance Oath of Office Matt Gettman, Chris Bollis, Mark McCutcheon Approval of Agenda Approval of Minutes New Business 1. LA19-000014 Precision Decks o/b/o Steven Prawer, 4470 Forest Lake Landing, Variance (Staff Melanie Curtis) 2. LA19-000018 Christopher W. Bollis and Rachel A. Bollis, 350 Stubbs Bay Road, Preliminary Plat (Staff: Jeremy Barnhart) 3. LA19-000019 Chris Lake o/b/o Brackett Point Property LLC, 1400 Bracketts Point Road, IUP/ CUP (Staff: Melanie Curtis) 4. LA19-000020 Veniamin Bocharnikov, 3593 Crystal Place, Variances (Staff: Melanie Curtis) 5. LA19-000021 Ben & Katrina Wasscher, 4775 North Shore Drive, Variances (Staff: Melanie Curtis) 6. LA19-000022 Mike Steadman o/b/o Eric Larson and Andrea Larson Trust, 690 Brown Road, Preliminary Plat (Staff: Jeremy Barnhart) 7. LA19-000023 Nor-Son Custom Builders o/b/o Charles &Jill Miller, 1600 Bohns Point Road, IUP (Staff: Melanie Curtis) 8. LA19-000024 Streeter and Associates o/b/o Peter& Nicole Thomas, 1385 Orono Lane, Variances (Staff: Melanie Curtis) 9. LA19-000025 Lakewest, LLC, 3245 Wayzata Boulevard, Preliminary Plat, Zone Change, Master Development Plan, IUP (Staff: Jeremy Barnhart) 10. Update on April 8, 2019 City Council meeting 11. Other issues for discussion: • Election of Officers Adjourn Sign up for email notifications at www.ci.orono.mn.us—follow links for Stay Connected & Email Notification MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,March 18,2019 6:30 o'clock p.m. ROLL CALL The Orono Planning Commission met on the above-mentioned date with the following members present: Chair John Thiesse, Commissioners Bob Erickson, Kevin Landgraver, Bruce Lemke, Dennis Libby, and Jon Ressler. Representing Staff were Community Development Director Jeremy Barnhart, City Planner Melanie Curtis, and Recorder Jackie Young. Council Member Seals was present. Chair Thiesse called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m., followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 19,2019 Landgraver moved,Libby seconded,to approve the minutes of the Orono Planning Commission meeting of February 19,2019,as submitted. VOTE: Ayes 6,Nays 0. NEW BUSINESS 2. LA19-000007 TOM RAUSCHER,2799 PHEASANT ROAD,VARIANCES, 6:32 P.M.— 6:51 P.M. Tom Rauscher,Applicant,was present. Curtis stated the applicant is proposing to redevelop the property with a new home and is requesting approval of lot area and lot width variances, an average lakeshore setback variance, lake setback variance, and a hardcover variance. The proposed home will be a rambler with a walkout basement, but because they are proposing increasing ceiling heights and therefore expand the volume of the home, variances are required. The existing home is located 61.2 feet from the OWHL and encroaches up to 24 feet lakeward of the average lakeshore setback line. A 388 square foot portion of the home is within the 75-foot setback as well as some stone stairs and retaining walls. There is also an existing 158 square foot patio on the walkout level of the east side of the home and a smaller, 38 square foot landing on the west side within the 75-foot setback. The applicant is proposing to construct the new home to fit within the existing footprint on the lake side of the home encroaching into the average lakeshore and 75-foot setbacks. A new 462 square foot patio is proposed on the first-floor level in the southeast corner of the home. Variances for setback are required due to the increase in mass within the existing nonconforming footprint. The 75-foot hardcover variance is relating to the new patio hardcover and location. Curtis displayed sketches of the new home and noted the red line indicates the elevation profile of the existing home. The proposed hardcover level of 24.9 percent reflects a 155 square foot overall increase from the existing conditions and 266 square feet of additional hardcover is proposed in the 75-foot setback due to the proposed, larger patio. The proposed home is 896 square feet larger than the existing home. Structural coverage is proposed at 12 percent. Page 1 of 13 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,March 18,2019 6:30 o'clock p.m. Staff finds that due to the applicant's choice to build a replacement home within the existing footprint, there are difficulties limiting the volume expansion within the existing setback from the lake. The location of the neighboring homes creating the average lakeshore setback also impacts the proposed volume increases. The proposed 61.2-foot setback from the lake affects the opportunities for improvements on the lake side of the home. The relocation of the lakeside patio to the main level of the home results in the loss of the "nonconforming" status of the existing patio setback and hardcover. The new patio request may be reasonable, but Staff suggests a reduction in the size so that the 75-foot zone hardcover is not increased over existing. Planning Staff recommends approval subject to the Planning Commission agreeing with or identifying practical difficulties supporting the variance. Staff does not support the larger patio in the 75-foot lake yard as proposed. The Planning Commission had no questions for Staff. Tom Rauscher, Applicant, stated they looked to keep this project from being too disruptive,which is why they are proposing to use a portion of the existing foundation. Currently there is no proper terrace there but there was a small little one in the rear corner. There are also the current stone steps. What is being proposed is to have a patio that is livable up on the main floor without having to deal with the garden level or the walkout on the side of the house. Lakeside living is why the Habermans are purchasing this house and they would like to construct the patio as proposed, but they would be willing to utilize pervious material if necessary. Landgraver asked what the dimensions of the porch are. Rauscher noted it is not really a porch but the structure is somewhere around 16' x 22 or 23 feet. They will be taking the upper portion by the stairs and pushing it out to where the current steps are going down to the grade. Thiesse asked if they are proposing to utilize the existing foundation. Rauscher indicated they are planning to utilize at least three-fourths of it. The front side is going to have an addition put on to it so the front wall of the foundation will be torn out. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 6:38 p.m. There were no public comments. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 6:38 p.m. Landgraver commented everything about the plan is smart but the patio. There is a little bit of massing associated with the house,but the homeowners are making the most out of the space. Landgraver stated in his view the patio is a little bit of a stretch since this is new construction. Ressler indicated he agrees with Commissioner Landgraver and that encroaching further on the lakeshore is something that is generally resisted, especially when there is not a lot of reason for supporting it. Page 2 of 13 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,March 18,2019 6:30 o'clock p.m. Thiesse asked whether the Planning Commissioners would be willing to come to some compromise on the patio. Landgraver stated it is too far lakeward and that he is not sure if it could angle down to the stairs. The proposed patio would be located 61 feet from the lakeshore and that he was trying to reconcile what 61 feet on the western side would look like. From the survey, it looks like it would abut the west side. Thiesse stated that is what he is struggling with and that it does not make a lot of sense to only build half of the patio but that he cannot support what is being proposed. Curtis pointed out the location of the average lakeshore setback line. Erickson stated his understanding is that as proposed there would be 104 square feet beyond the 75-foot line. While that is not a huge number, it is hard to see why it could not be reduced by that amount. If the lower left corner would have more of a rounded corner rather than a square corner,that could eliminate some area, which would bring it more in compliance. Curtis suggested rather than trying to reconfigure the shape of the patio, it might be helpful for the applicants to suggest a level that the Planning Commission feels would allow a little bit more to accommodate the stairs. Lemke asked if the whole house could be pushed back eight feet. Curtis indicated the applicants would still be within the footprint and would be essentially what they are proposing. Curtis stated she does not believe from a construction standpoint that is what they are looking to do, and that the red line is the existing house and they are attempting to just add on to the street side and then going upward. Lemke commented he does not have a problem with the height increase but it is so far into the average lakeshore setback and the setback between the adjacent houses that he has trouble justifying a further encroachment. Thiesse stated he struggles with the fact that the patio seems too large, but he can see a practical difficulty with living on the lake and not having a space to sit on outside. Rauscher pointed out the existing staircase. Rauscher stated they could eliminate anything past the furthest point of the house,which would give them a 10' x 20' terrace. One of the goals is to not to break into the retaining wall and disturb the grade. The terrace will never be seen from the lake since it sits six feet higher and the lake drops even more. From a practical standpoint, a lower level patio is probably not going to get used as much and it will not be as practical for them. If that line is kept straight across,that would provide a decent size terrace and stay within the confines of what is currently there. Landgraver commented that sounds like a good compromise. Landgraver moved to recommend approval of Application No. LA19-000007,Tom Rauscher,2799 Pheasant Road,granting of variances,with the reduction in the size of the deck as proposed by the applicant,and subject to the recommendations of Staff. Page 3 of 13 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,March 18,2019 6:30 o'clock p.m. Ressler stated it makes sense to allow the steps to be connected to the patio in lieu of the stepping stones. Lemke seconded the motion. Landgraver stated he does not want to over engineer the connection from the stairs to the patio but that he would accept that friendly amendment. Thiesse noted whether it is stepping stones or stairs, it would be considered hardcover. Landgraver amended his motion to recommend approval of Application No.LA19-000007,Tom Rauscher,2799 Pheasant Road,granting of variances,with the reduction in the size of the deck as proposed by the applicant,to allow hardcover from the patio to the steps,and subject to the recommendations of Staff. Libby indicated he would support the friendly amendment. Lemke stated he would not support it since he has a concern that the patio would extend out as far as it is currently proposed. Landgraver asked if Commissioner Lemke would be amenable with having the applicant submit a plan prior to the City Council meeting showing the connection. Lemke indicated he would prefer to see the plan. Thiesse asked whether Commissioner Lemke would be okay if the applicants decrease the patio size as proposed and then allow some sort of connection subject to approval by the City Council. Lemke stated he would be fine with that. VOTE: Ayes 6,Nays 0. 3. LA19-000009 REAL ASSETS/JAMISON KOHOUT, 1645 SHADYWOOD ROAD, PRELIMINARY PLAT,6:52 P.M.—7:00 P.M. Jamison Kohout, Applicant, was present. Barnhart stated the applicant is requesting preliminary plat approval to split the existing 2.51-acre parcel into two buildable lots and an outlot, in a front lot/back lot configuration. This property was the subject of a preliminary plat action in 2013 but the corresponding final plat was never filed. The preliminary plat expired in November 2014. This proposal is identical in layout compared to the original approved preliminary plat with the exception of the lot sizes. The applicant proposes to split the 2.51-acre parcel into two lots with a 30-foot wide access outlook. Lot 1 would consist of 1.55 acres and be 140.27 feet wide. Lot 2 would be 0.75 acres and be 110.21 feet wide. Both lots exceed the requirements of a lot in the LR-1C zoning district. Access to Lot 1 would be via Outlot A and Lot 2 would be accessed via a shared driveway off of Shadywood Road. Both properties will be served with sewer and water. Page 4 of 13 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,March 18,2019 6:30 o'clock p.m. The City Engineer has pointed out the need for an additional easement over the service lines for Lot 1. Hennepin County supports the proposed access. The applicants are not proposing to clear cut the lot but there are some trees in the middle of Lot 1 that will need to be removed. A Conservation Design was done in preparation for the 2013 application and recognize that this was a maple/basswood forest. There were no comments that the trees proposed to be removed be preserved. Staff has received some comments regarding grading and runoff along Outlot A and that will be reviewed very closely as part of this application. Planning Staff recommends approval, subject to the following conditions: 1. Final plat applied for within one year of preliminary plat approval. 2. Easement to the benefit of both lots and the city for access and utilities over all of Outlot A. 3. Easement to protect utility service lines serving the two parcels. The Planning Commission had no questions for Staff. Jamison Kohout, Real Assets, LLC, stated this is basically the same application that was proposed previously and that his family will be relocating to Orono and they would like to take advantage of the lots. Kohout stated he was unaware either of the lot sizes had changed. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 6:54 p.m. Brian Zjawiony, 1675 Shadywood Road, stated currently runoff from Outlot A is washing out Shadywood Road and that it needs to be addressed. There are three or four massive potholes that have developed. Zjawiony indicated he is fine with the rest of the proposal. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 6:55 p.m. Lemke commented he hates to see all the trees cut down but there is not much the City can do to prevent it. Once the grading plan is developed,the owner will have a better idea of how many trees will need to be removed. Thiesse asked if this property will have city sewer. Barnhart indicated it will. Libby stated since the erosion has been exacerbated by the weather, some type of recommendations from the City Engineer to help abate the problem would be warranted. Ressler stated he also does not see a way to avoid cutting down the trees. Ressler indicated he has not noticed the erosion to be necessarily tied to the curb cut but that it could just be the weather in general and is something that could be reviewed by the City Engineer. Page 5 of 13 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,March 18,2019 6:30 o'clock p.m. Barnhart noted the grading plan is always reviewed by the City Engineer to ensure there is no impact to the neighboring properties or any other issues. Thiesse asked if there is a requirement that the driveway be paved. Barnhart stated the City generally sees driveways paved in these situations. Landgraver stated the preliminary plat is consistent with what was approved last time and he would be in favor of it. Lemke moved,Ressler seconded,to recommend approval of Application No.LA19-000009,Real Assets/Jamison Kohout, 1645 Shadywood Road,Preliminary Plat,subject to the conditions recommended by Staff. VOTE: Ayes 6,Nays 0. 4. LA19-000010 REHKAMP LARSON ARCHITECTS,2587 KELLY AVENUE, VARIANCES AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT,7:00 P.M.—7:13 P.M. Jean Rehkamp and Sarah Nymo, Rehkamp Larson Architects,were present. Curtis stated the applicant is requesting a side setback variance to permit the reconstruction of an existing one-level, detached garage in a larger footprint at an improved but still substandard side yard setback. The existing 441 square foot garage is 2.5 feet from the side lot line and is proposed to be removed. The applicant is proposing a 4.3-foot setback for a new 744 square foot two-story garage. The required setback for an accessory building less than 1,000 square feet is 7.5 feet. A detached garage with recreation space is permitted, and a conditional use permit is requested so that a full bathroom with shower/bathtub can be installed. Supportive comments from the neighbor most directly impacted were received and have been included in the Commission's packet. Staff recommends approval of the variance subject to conformance with the building official's comments, the building code, and the comments of the City Engineer. Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit. The property owners would be required to file a covenant agreeing that the structure will not be used as a dwelling until a permit is obtained allowing use of the building as a dwelling. The Planning Commission had no questions for Staff. Rehkamp stated this project was inspired by an existing 900 square foot cottage on the lot that has been there since the1900s. The cottage is in great shape. The property owners have three children and are hoping to have them visit this summer. The extra square footage comes from the desire to maintain the existing cottage and have some extra room for their children. Nymo noted the cottage already has one existing bathroom and the detached garage with a studio above it provides a little more room and privacy. Landgraver asked if the garage will mirror the cottage aesthetically. Page 6 of 13 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,March 18,2019 6:30 o'clock p.m. Rehkamp indicated the materials will match but that it will have a steeper roofline than the cottage so some living space can be gained. Landgraver asked if it is one and a half or two full baths in the garage. Rehkamp indicated it is two. Thiesse asked whether the retaining walls are new or existing. Nymo noted there are existing retaining walls there presently that will be modified. The garage could be built further into the property, but there is an egress/ingress easement with the adjacent neighbor, and they would also like to preserve the view of the cottage as you enter the property. Libby asked what steps will be taken to address the runoff Rehkamp stated they have not gone to the level of engineering yet but that something will need to be done since the whole wall of the garage is buckling in. Lemke asked if the new garage is taller than the existing one. Rehkamp indicated it is. The lower side of the garage,which is the highest side,would be 24 feet. Thiesse asked if the City is going to require that this not be living quarters. Curtis indicated that is part of the covenant. Thiesse commented it seems like this would be a perfect opportunity for it to become sleeping quarters and asked what process the applicants would need to go through in order for that to happen. Curtis stated they would require double the acreage. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 7:08 p.m. There were no public comments. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 7:08 p.m. Libby stated given the circumstances of this being a familial type of arrangement and with the City having ample regulations,this structure could easily be converted into a rental. Libby stated there is a definite housing need for this type of structure. Thiesse noted they would not be allowed given the acreage. Curtis noted the applicants are not requesting that either. Ressler commented he would be in support of it and that the massing is away from the lake. Page 7 of 13 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,March 18,2019 6:30 o'clock p.m. Landgraver stated the trees will likely need to be cleared out since that is probably what is pushing the wall in. The new structure will blend in since it will look like the cottage, and the other alternative would be to tear out the cottage and put in a mansion. Landgraver stated in his view the recommended conditions by Staff relating to a dwelling and home occupation are good. Erickson stated he is comforted by the four conditions being recommended, and based on that, he could support the application. Lemke commented it is a big mass and will change the visual appearance of the area, but overall it is a nice improvement to the site and neighborhood. Libby moved,Landgraver seconded,to recommend approval of Application No. LA19-000010, Rehkamp Larson Architects,on behalf of Alexander and Amy Ware,2587 Kelly Avenue,variances and conditional use permit,subject to staff recommendations. VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. 5. LA18-000011 JULIE LENSING,3349 CRYSTAL BAY ROAD,VARIANCES,7:13 P.M.— 7:38 P.M. Julie Lensing, Applicant,was present. Curtis noted the pink line on the survey depicts the property line. Curtis stated the applicant is requesting a rear yard setback variance in order to construct an 18' x 8' addition on the rear of the existing home. Although hardcover is not being added,because the property exceeds 25 percent hardcover and the proposal involves an expansion from non-building to building hardcover, a hardcover variance is also required. The lot is nonconforming with respect to area and width. Staff finds practical difficulties inherent with the size, shape, and location of Crystal Bay Road as well as with the lake which may justify granting variances allowing the addition. As with other lots on Crystal Bay Road, in evaluating lot area and hardcover,the square footage of the improved drive lane of Crystal Bay Road is not included. The applicant's existing home is about 38 feet deep. The applicant is requesting a rear yard setback variance to construct an 18' x 8' addition resulting in a setback from the rear lot line of approximately 1.2 inches. The property's 118 feet of depth is challenging, particularly due to the fact that the 75-foot and average lake setbacks and the 30-foot rear yard setback nearly overlap. The required setbacks result in a 5-foot deep building envelope. The proposed 0.1-foot setback poses additional challenges regarding construction,the building code, fire codes, as well as the logistics of working within the adjacent property owned by the Hennepin County Regional Rail Authority. There is an existing shed encroaching on HCRRA's property. The HCRRA representative has indicated that removal/relocation of the applicant's existing shed which encroaches on the HCRRA property may alleviate their concerns about further encroachments should the variance be approved. Relocation of the shed to a location within the property boundaries would likely require setback and hardcover variances. If grading is to occur on their property, a permit from HCRRA would be required. Page 8 of 13 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,March 18,2019 6:30 o'clock p.m. The existing hardcover level is 42.9 percent. The addition is proposed to be constructed over an existing patio. No new hardcover is proposed. Due to the change in the nature of the nonconforming hardcover, an expansion from non-building to building, a hardcover variance is required. If the variance is approved,adjustments to the building plans are necessary, specifically to the gutters, roof, eaves and foundation,which the architect has indicated could be accomplished. Staff does not support the variance reducing the rear yard variance from 7.4 feet to 0.1 feet. If the Planning Commission supports the variance, Staff would add the following to the record: The proposed setback of 1.2 inches does not account for the need of the homeowners' access around the home for maintenance without trespassing on the HCRRA property. Permitting requirements should be complied with. Staff finds the hardcover variance to be reasonable considering the practical difficulties affecting the property. The Commission should review the plans regarding the rear yard setback. The applicant did receive a supportive comment from the neighbor to the east. The aerial photo reflects a play structure that is no longer there but the shed is still there. Curtis displayed the first floor and second floor house plans and elevation views. The plans would be adjusted in conformance with the architect's notes and building official's comments. Thiesse asked if the applicant will obtain an easement or a permit for the grading. Curtis indicated the applicant will need to obtain that permitting but she is not aware if an easement is required. Thiesse noted Staff has recommended personal access around the building. Curtis stated that was to alleviate Staff's concerns with maintaining the structure. Curtis noted this is not the only tight setback that exists in this area. Libby asked for clarification on the location of the shed. Curtis indicated it is located entirely within the Rail Authority's property and the shed is not in a highly observed area. There are also a number of other encroachments on the Rail Authority's property by other property owners. Landgraver noted the neighbors are essentially in the same position with the tight setbacks. Curtis displayed an aerial photograph of the area. Landgraver commented those tight setbacks are critical to his interpretation of this request. Page 9 of 13 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,March 18,2019 6:30 o'clock p.m. Libby noted the City Engineer's comments make it fairly clear that if any excavation needs to be done, it would require written permission from the Rail Authority. Libby suggested the homeowner do some due diligence on how that encroachment may impact their title in reselling the property. Lemke asked if there is a jog in the property line. Curtis indicated she does not know why it is that way but that there are several jogs in that area that do not make a lot of sense. Lemke stated he was wondering whether that was purchased from the Rail Authority at some point. Julie Lensing,Applicant, stated she appreciates the opportunity to speak about what she would like to do. Lensing indicated she also was curious about the jog in the property line and she was told that many years ago the Rail Authority offered the residents the opportunity to purchase some of the land,which is why that is a funny shape. Lemke asked if that is still available. Lensing indicated she does not know that. There are some significant areas of concern with the existing house and that the hope is the addition will improve the functionality. The lot makes the options very limiting and in her view this is the best option. Lensing noted currently her laundry room is in the garage and that she needs to bring laundry baskets down one whole flight of stairs and then open and close the garage entry door as well as the laundry room door. This addition would allow the laundry room to be located on the main floor level. In addition,the master bedroom has a very small closet and the addition would allow a small walk-in closet. Between her and her fiancé,they have six children, and they would like to put some bunkbeds on the upper floor to accommodate some of the children when they visit. Lensing indicated she has worked very closely with the Hennepin County Rail Association and the building code inspector. With regard to the encroachment,there is a 5' x 5' shed that was there when the property was purchased. Lensing indicated she is willing to remove that. Further, Jessica from the Rail Authority noted that it appears there is currently a shed encroachment on HCRRA's property adjacent to 3339 Crystal Bay Road and that remedying this encroachment would mitigate their concern about the 0-foot setback clearance. Lensing noted the building official had listed four bullet points on one of the attachments. The architect has stated he will change the plans so these four requirements will be met. Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 7:28 p.m. There were no public comments. Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 7:28 p.m. Thiesse asked if the basement or foundation level will be two feet shorter and the house itself will cantilever over. Page 10 of 13 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,March 18,2019 6:30 o'clock p.m. Curtis stated that is what the architect is indicating can be done. Ressler stated the biggest issue he is struggling with is going closer to the property line and that he is undecided on the addition as a whole. Ressler stated it is a small house on a small lot but he can see the merits of the addition. Thiesse asked if the City has an obligation to provide room for a person to stay on their property to perform maintenance. Landgraver noted the City decided it was okay on the buffer zone. Landgraver stated when you first look at it,the reaction is no way, because the homeowner cannot maintain their addition without trespassing on somebody else's property. On a relative basis, it looks like a little bit of a buffer was added in when they sold them the land, but that is also right on the edge of the lot. Overall, for the neighborhood, it does not seem as egregious and the applicant is not asking for something that is radically different from the neighbors. Invariably, however,the neighbor on the left is going to rebuild and they will ask for the same thing. Given the number of homes in the neighborhood that are in a similar situation, he is predisposed to approving it. Lemke stated he is in agreement with Commissioner Landgraver and at first he felt the same way with how it didn't make any sense, but in looking at the practical difficulties and the use of the home, it makes sense. Erickson stated the question is whether the proposed use is reasonable, which puts the Planning Commission in the position of needing to decide if a one-inch setback is reasonable. A one-inch setback has not been necessary for anyone else. Other nearby properties have gotten variances, but they have been five or six-foot variances. Erickson stated with a one-inch setback,they cannot do anything to the house without going on the neighbor's property and there would not even be room for a fence between the house and the trail. Erickson stated he has a problem with that but he has not figured a way around it. Thiesse noted it is difficult to construct a bunk room less than seven feet. and they only have eight feet. Erickson commented he would encourage the applicant to try to purchase some more land. Thiesse stated an easement would also be an option. Libby stated he was encouraged that the applicant has had an ongoing dialogue with the Rail Authority since that would allow exploration of those two options and that he was impressed by the architect's idea of the cantilever to accommodate the odd nature of what is being proposed. Removal of the shed has alleviated the concerns with the shed. Libby commented he just does not know, since it is so out of the ordinary and there are other factors in play, whether it should go right up to the edge. The property owner will have to have some very clearly defined permissions from the Rail Authority to maintain that side of the house, and as long as that occurs, he would not have a problem with it. Thiess recommended the applicant speak with the Rail Authority about the easement since the property owner cannot access the back of the house without crossing the property line. Page 11 of 13 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,March 18,2019 6:30 o'clock p.m. Landgraver stated given the other landscaping and structures by the neighbors,the Rail Authority probably is in agreement. Ressler stated without redesigning it himself,the architect could perhaps bring it back to seven feet so there is some room there. Lemke moved to recommend approval of Application No. LA18-000011,Julie Lensing,3349 Crystal Bay Road as proposed,granting of a hardcover variance and a rear yard setback variance, subject to Staff recommendations. Landgraver stated the proposed setback of 1.2 inches does not account for the homeowner's need for access without trespassing on HCRRA property. Curtis indicated Staff will follow up with the HCRRA representative and will assist the applicant with the maintenance access. Landgraver seconded. VOTE: Ayes 4,Nays 2,Erickson and Ressler Opposed. 6. UPDATE ON MARCH 11,2019,CITY COUNCIL MEETING Barnhart reported the City Council took the following actions at their March 11 meeting: • Approved the dock on Fox Street but reduced the length of the dock by eight feet. • Approved variances for 3369 Crystal Bay Road. • Approved the after-the-fact variance on Shadywood Road on consent. • The Council also reviewed the conditional use permit for the Narrows and the Lakeroom and those were approved with some modifications to the hours. The City Council did not change the live music limitations. • The Council reviewed a concept plan for an apartment building proposed by Trident Development for Willow and Kelley but they did not support it because they felt the density was too high. • Reviewed a concept plan for extending MUSA to Deering Island. The Council generally seemed supportive of that. 7. OTHER ISSUES FOR DISCUSSION Barnhart noted a volunteer to attend the next City Council meeting on April 8 is needed. Thiesse noted Commissioners Landgraver, Olson, and Lemke are attending their last meeting and that he appreciates the time they have served on the Planning Commission. ADJOURNMENT Landgraver moved,Ressler seconded,to adjourn the Orono Planning Commission meeting at 7:49 p.m. VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 1,Lemke Opposed. Page 12 of 13 MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Monday,March 18,2019 6:30 o'clock p.m. ATTEST: John Thiesse, Chair Page 13 of 13 Date Application Received: 02/25/19 O�T Date Application Considered as Complete:02/25/19 60-Day Review Period Expires: 04/26/19 To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members ? �~ Dustin Rief, City Administrator sHORF' From: Melanie Curtis, Planner WOG Date: 15 April 2019 Subject: #LA19-000014, Nick Rukamp o/b/o Steven Prawer,4470 Forest Lake Landing, Variance Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting average lakeshore setback variances in order to rebuild existing decks in kind footprints (minor changes to the lakeside deck). Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. Background The home on the subject property is nearly entirely lakeward of the average lakeshore setback line due to the extreme setback from the lake of the property to the north.The applicant plans to rebuild the existing decks on the street side and lake side of the home in the same footprint. Minor changes to the lakeside deck to rotate the staircase and to raise the deck floor 22 inches (to meet the door threshold) are proposed. Both decks are within the average lakeshore setback. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-330&78-1279-Setbacks: LR-1B Required Existing Proposed Rear/Street 30' ±64'street side deck No change ±11' lakeside deck North Side 7.5' ±22' street side deck No change ±35' lakeside deck South Side 7.5' ±30'street side deck No change Lakeshore 75' ±138' lakeside deck No change The lakeside deck is situated approximately 60 feet lakeward of the average lakeshore setback line.A small portion of the street side deck is Average Lakeshore within the setback. The decks are proposed to rebuilt in the same footprints with a stair orientation change and a 22" elevation increase on the lakeside deck. FILE#LA19-000013 15 April 2019 Page 2 of 4 Section 78-330-Lot Area/Width: LR-1B Lot Area Lot Width Required 43,560 s.f. (1.0 acres) 140' Actual 18,950 s.f. (0.43 acre) ±67' @ 75'/±51' @ OHWL Section 78-1403-Structural Building Coverage: Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 18,950 s.f. (0.43 acre) Allowed: 3,790 s.f. (20%) Proposed: 1,604 s.f. (8%) Section 78-1680 and 78-1700-Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Total Area in Allowed Existing Proposed Overlay District Zone Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover Tier Tier 1 18,950 s.f. 4,737 s.f. 3,100 s.f. 3,112 s.f. (25%) (16.3%) (16.4%) Applicable Regulations: Average Lakeshore Setback Variance (Section 78-1279) Due to the property's orientation and the extreme setback from the lake of the home to the north, a large portion of the subject property and nearly the entire home is lakeward of the average lakeshore setback line with a very limited buildable area.The applicant's proposal includes in-kind re-construction of two existing decks.The lakeside deck is proposed to be elevated 22 inches to the patio door level to eliminate the immediate stair out the door and the stairs leading off the deck are being turned to the south lakeward of the average lakeshore setback line. Governing Regulation:Variance(Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.537 Subd. 6(2)variances shall only be permitted when: FILE#LA19-000013 15 April 2019 Page 3 of 4 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The variances are minimal and generally consistent with the intent of the ordinance. This criterion is met. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The requested variances are consistent with the residential goals within the comprehensive plan. This criterion is met. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The minimal changes to the reconstructed lakeside deck lakeward of the average lakeshore setback are reasonable residential property.This criterion is met. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The property's orientation;the distance separation between the subject home and the neighboring homes; the existing trees separating the homes on either side combined with the elevation in relation to the lake result in a unique circumstance allowing for the decks to be almost completely screened from the adjacent homes; and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The changes to the existing lakeside deck are minimal,will be generally screened from the neighboring homes, and will not adversely impact views of the lake from the neighboring homes.This condition is met. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn.Stat. §216C.06,subd. 2,when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78.This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as residential decks are an allowed use in the LR-1B District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling.This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property.The home and decks are existing and there are mature property line trees and arborvitae which provide screening.The topography also situates the applicant's home and decks out of direct view of the neighbors, the decks will not adversely impact adjacent properties.This criterion is met. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located.The applicant's proposal does not appear to be out of character with the area.This criterion is met. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant.The applicant's request to rebuild the existing lakeside deck in a more functional footprint is reasonable and necessary.This statement is true. FILE#LA19-000013 15 April 2019 Page 4 of 4 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals,or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter.The proposed changes to the existing decks will not impair the health, safety, comfort or morals of the public.This criterion is met. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty.This statement is true. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Practical Difficulties Statement Applicant has provided supporting documentation regarding the applicable Practical Difficulties attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Practical Difficulties Analysis Staff finds due to the nature of the lot and the applied setbacks there are practical difficulties supporting granting the average lakeshore setback variance for the changes to the lakeside deck in conjunction with a near in-kind replacement.The applicant's desire to utilize the existing footprint in a slightly more functional footprint orientation is reasonable. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Summary Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Existing Survey Exhibit D. Aerial Photos Exhibit E. Proposed Plans Exhibit F. Site Photos Exhibit G. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit H. Property Owners List Exhibit I. Plat Map Land Use Application Summary Application Date: 02/25/2019 Address: 4470 FOREST LAKE LANDING MOUND, MN 55364 Parcel Number: 0711723240040 Land Use Number: LA 19-000014 Application Submitted By: Agent on behalf of property owner Owner: Name: STEVEN E PRAWER Address: 8313 W FRANKLIN ST LOUIS PARK, MN 55426 Applicant: Name: Nick Rukamp Address: 20170 75th Ave N Corcoran, MN 55340 nick@psdecks.com Contact Information: Associated Contact: Nick Rukamp nick@psdecks.com Associated Contact: Lyndsay Olson lndsay@psdecks.com Associated Contact: Scott Prawer praw0003@gmail.com Associated Contact: Project Description: Rebuild front and back decks ALS setback needed Land Use Application Type: Amendmend Application -a Appeal of Admin Decision Li Concept Application Li Conditional Use Permit L Site Plan Application Li Subdivision Application L Subdivision Exception Li Vacation Application L. Variance Application i-✓ Applicant Signature: PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM LA19-000014 1.The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter. Response:The back deck will be raised by 20" to be level with existing patio door, and the staircase to the yard will be relocated to side of deck so it doesn't run into chimney on the house. 2.The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. Response: N/A 3.The variance, if granted,will not alter the essential character of the locality. Response: No 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. Response: N/A S. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems.Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes,Section 116106, Subd. 2,when in harmony with this Chapter. Response: N/A 6.The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. Response: N/A 7.The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. Response: N/A 8.The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. Response: N/A 9.The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. Response: N/A 10.The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Response: Yes 11.The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health,safety,comfort, morals,or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. Response: No 12.The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Response: Yes --_ , P .1)'.0/--11+2,32-1400146 'ttiE KM 1,./4.1111,1E.Y V.E5DtkICE ........ . I-/410 tnti-1,T I.HrY-'..ANDill,,,, . . OCONOlt111 51:44,1 1L1//4€/ CC,COTOAL.51TV./LAN 1-a F1 K.F.COEfaAT101,3tNErs3 i, m. -.:...$ „...,-, ----- & ..,....i:,, - - ,-: \ _----- :. __-- 61) _---- . ----- - -- -,- ..,•.:'",C..- ` , --- __ -- _— \ !S lf- \ .." s '`. .,, 53 ..• .....,i 1 • 0 IL ' ..V:•,„, •''. \ ? 1 A'• ' '. .1w. . \ :,- I • i \ viCS ,,,r--"<!-:•.' ,,,..., --'\ , ( i ,..„ 0„E i ,....,..,<= = . . i ii -E F2 •,.r.,;,! 4,1,01 .Rmirea I.-- 7,,,,, ,:AVI 7 )74,1;47 MO 42 A985 — .....--,.....4., .... „„ • .: , , ....1;;. I d it- .,,,, ., ..tg:. -e4:'-''''',.- .,� r ♦� { ol, ,,... by T `�„ * ' ' " i-..-44:;,--- �'" F- - e • xi x 9f fir I „ ::a y fi ��o 4 .'„rt •�.•� s•i ,>,5----"' .'7,, - 4 44.1014 .. c v 'gy :. • •• ... 5y�✓' :. ✓ i. •� "_ ert may ' '�y A ! L-. 11 .f, ,_ • Existing Deck: a. s '� with 3 steps out "' of door :a„ � k , . x. i. ,r ` a# `f 1 ' t • • , a r j • tint .;fes ' § „..-1.•,.5.;,- -*. x p{ y ;;;;',-,F,':;..-;:,7- d” ✓1♦ :, ��E� � . ,, '! ,,� k ..."T�iP�k Ari W t 1 , 4•� f k a ..r 4 -- 4 ` ... kg, :..4 ..` . • S t „.._..„,„,„ \ . l y c.` , • G- , ..„,. . , illii 2 • ' Wr,..1"I° \.., .' ; \I i..th i.,....,,,,, , t �.�� ''i1V f hy_i' ^S S ` 'K'n •� ,**, ” aFy"` ..14v.,�y}--,1;34,, e -I{ECS PROJECT DESIGN DONE BY PRECISION DECKS PROJECT DETAILS SITE PICTURE IZ I BACK DECK g O,' 1)POST:6x6.60 grade ground contact treated post set on top of 12"concrete footing 16"bell if U 2)BEAM:(3)2x10 treated glued and nailed together set on top of 6x6 post W 3)JOIST:2x10 treated using LU210 hangers 16"on center ( nt 4)LEDGER:2x10 treated attached with 2-5"ledger locks 12"on center 5)FASCIA: 1x12 Trex Island Mist 6)DECKING: 5/4x6 Trex in Island Mist with single decking border in Island Mist-outside perimeter --- 7)RAILING: Railcraft 7000 series aluminum railing cable style with 1 5/8"x 3 5/8"posts powder coated in .c textured textured black _� r 0 8)OPTIONS:Cedar lattice around base of deck-paint not included. ;a. ''�' I ..H 7,1 FRONT DECK • m`.`7' 1)POST:6x6.60 grade ground contact treated post set on top of existing concrete footings c, "r2. 2)BEAM:(3)2x10 treated glued and nailed together set on top of 6x6 post o°erusf 3)JOIST:2x10 treated using LU210 hangers 16"on center SHEET INDEX 5)FASCIA: 1x12 Trex Island Mist Sheet 1 Title Sheet 6)DECKING: 5/4x6 Trex in Island Mist with single decking border in Island Mist-outside perimeter Sheet 2 Project Design 7)RAILING: Redi Rail 100 series with square aluminum balusters and 3"posts in textured black. Sheet 3 Framing Details 8)OPTIONS:Cedar lattice around base of deck-paint not included. Sheet 4 Framing Details Sheet 5 Project Details _Si 3 y7qN NOTICE DISCLAIMER AND GENERAL NOTES KEY/ LEGEND °""O COPYRIGHT ALL DESIGNS AND 3-D RENDERINGS THIS PLAN SET,COMBINED WITH THE BUILDING O FOOTING PLACEMENT N PROVIDED ARE COPYRIGHT PROPERTY OF CONTRACT,PROVIDES BUILDING DETAILS FOR THE y PRECISION DECKS.ANY DUPLICATION OF RESIDENTIAL PROJECT.PRECISION DECKS WILL = THIS DESIGN IS SUBJECT TO PENALTY VERIFY THAT SITE CONDITIONS ARE CONSISTENT ® RAILING POST PLACEMENT e AND/OR CHARGES. WITH THESE PLANS BEFORE STARTING WORK. WORK NOT SPECIFICALLY DETAILED SHALL BE N .l ALL 3-D RENDERINGS ARE CLOSE CONSTRUCTED TO THE SAME QUALITY AS SIMILAR Z RAILING CAP POST LIGHT PLACEMENT REPRESENTATION OF THE PROPOSED WORK THAT IS DETAILED. ALL WORK SHALL BE Date:3/20/2019 DESIGN,BUT NOT EXACT.SITE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE BUILDING scale: 1/4• DIMENSIONS AND SITE CONDITIONS CODES AND LOCAL BUILDING CODES. • TREX WEDGE LIGHT PLACEMENT Project:Custom COULD ADJUST THE LOOK OF FINAL PRODUCT.SOME MATERIAL LIMITATIONS SITE DIMENSIONS AND SITE CONDITIONS TAKE Sheet Number. MAY APPLY. PRECEDENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND GENERAL NOTES. 1 Redlines indicate z I existing deck footprint 1 "6W' 1' LQ 1' ko 4'-4" 1co v c„ HhIiiIi - A o0 io8�< ri m olio 0 E��. • .-Ica OA d _m 1 L QI I< 29' Iy N a o Date:3/20/2019 Scale: 1/4 yr j.n:Custom Sheet Number: Oz Pt<-OJECT DESIGN 1 - BACK DECK 2 Rt� (lakeside) I 1-- Igil _g_ 'E Ln, W cF• 7, f� 4'�I liWg 1 nal YL v CJ a - W to 9 Ni _z .;®tar, a nilDa'ao a a E r< d' 1 T_9" ,, 10'-2„ 77 I ti W c aj al r_ al w „ ao l- Date:3/20/2019 Scale: 1/0' Project:Custom Sheet Number. 3 PROJECT DESIGN 1 - FRONT DECK 3 t/a=10 tt Z I dol I �� I T ��o i 1 td/W� A I I I I 77 L—'' Gly eo =O .0a OI(1 mc�c"m Gly uMo9n FS) z l'a.. r i —— —— � — 2X10 LEDGER–'-'L V' 2X12 PT STRINGERS X LI' // a9^„ I lli y BL,x zm �� N\y H m O v f) / a+ 3-2X10 DROP BEAM \ / N it g 11 II1'-/ Date:3/20/2019 wale: 1/d" ecCustom 29' Sheet Number: ®FRAMING DETAIL— BACK DECK 4 am oa M Z v m a M 1 ,..c,---8'-10rr t 4 9" A ._ k 1c_ = e .. a O 9 Of i, m 0 7 v CO Ic n +<r I ht s 2X10 KDAT JOIST 16"OC 'IIIII I- ------!!!A — �1111L 1III_I•II - NEW 6X6 PT POST SET �EtIMIII� EXISTING CONCRETE FOOTINGS ,II NI 1111 x III rai 111 II =r ll - III 3 :4tillwl: i I r 1 1 ' 1 1 N ^ sheet Me: Design For: Design By: e •s^ prewar Residence Precision Decks PRECISION N °W Framing 4470 Forest Lake Lending 20170 75th Ave North V N, 1 CION Orono,MN 55364 Corcoran,MN 55340 1 1�V\�VLV1 3 yt Details MN. DECKS i 3 MN.LicBC583025 ♦rn�siun rOR OUi uOUR tiv:no ii2 x10'Joist 16"G.C. IZ 04afirfi Post 5112'Ledger Locks Flashing kL/ ^ --Grade Simpson AB66 Bracket 3-2 v 10'Beam -F Y�U o 514'Decking 1 VW°= 4t 6'r 6'PT Post . 1111 _ Igc.-)1 - Full Pour Concrete Fooling 2v10 Joist :IA' -_- Grade ..111 �� < I . LU210 Hanger f �I�I IA S 2560 L wnn z i� A,_, 11=11 11•II 11 II•II 11 11 11 II=11 11=11=11=11.11.11 edger S Ledger Lacks l2'OC Pall °FOOTING DETAIL °BEAM DETAIL ()LEDGER DETAIL 9 ANminum Top Ran ,sl9's 3 5r8"Aluminum Post v Stemless Steel Cable Aluminum Top Cap u e Z SW Square Balusters MI o c -•_- Recti Ran Aluminum Railing 1hr � rOla<D(hill • 3'Radi Rail Post il --iMIIIMI M1111111 //lm =1IMMI 111111•111111 . _���������������� ..a.ei�at.t -. I 2 \�Trex 1x12 Island Mist tv,z rrerlslane uiat k� II 'e.M�.,. � F c.a e+ i : L d e_ II w. o".e .. a' a0 Date:3/20/2019 Scale: 1/4" ()BACK DECK RAILING DETAIL °FRONT DECK RAILING DETAIL ()FRONT DECK STAIR DETAIL Pra,e :Custom Sheet Number: ®PROJECT DETAILS 6 11111111111111111111.1111111.11.aar 1' r • Lakeside Deck-Exisitng ' ��'A1T { � L'a' � 4. t# • y4 ate. � 1, ,i4t .,,,, ,. ., .: : Y ` fit'✓ 1 .. `5 �t , d .4 E N_ 1? 'r°; fi x :.1,3"., 3 r31 iflii•t4i `_. , iii ': ;ei.k 5 4 ? r'. a i , i . e .'..-1' - . . , „ 1 1 il 1 10 I 1-. .0' 0 1, z Y • - u' .: g t.-P �;?'I A '. ,%%; r :--i--,,+-7--, , § .; ' fi' ',,i.•,.4e.' i�'', ,33','-'` #.. c,- ,,..; +4 '',4.'4,`," ''' t �. �' ' - sgc i:.2,, ;44 �.`' aka '; 1'74' '74'". - fix.'". -a ;y ,„ - res i �_ s 1 4. � "r . 'fill i � • a ff -- ...:1:i.il-I., ' Yr, 'N, ,. . - ' , : . --,- 4 t- ,.. . \ ..,, t •" "11,. 'CI ik k ii 1;'--.'". . '-.''. -:% '- ''4.' ,'8' , ''' \ ........ . -_ ,Iv..,:,__ 31,.-‘, _ ,_ _ • i_ .,, ,,. _v_, _, - .. . ..1 , ,1/47- .„. _ .._ . . 1 It '.‘ a r .- •.1 t , . , ..... , , .. ., , if . i _ ____ ., t -, :,',. t . '', • , ' ' 1(;:r.;... I.. '. ;.' '''k,''' .%.-, .4, - ..„ . tri tit i iii+ '' City of Orono �oA,o Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address: 1' 7-6 Forts j -, c i r) �„„,4_opj Prepared by: pre() hri btr Da (/2421 0 Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle o ) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 1: EXISTING HARDCOVER In the following table identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to site plan or survey(must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Hardcover Item(Describe) Length x Width Total Survey (Square Feet) (Example) (Garage) (24'x 30') (720 S.F.) A f OU f, 241r�X` 4� 2'x” l D52, S.F. B qr., nrG iz�x -i 55Z S.F. C n yL 44,�( �qpp l'DX. lot XI() 1.002, S.F. D Front Y°fc rt+t,5A-00p 4"'(�"X V 34 2,5S.F. E FrQn-1- C.�. pyp i. Z `ll'XtI-'5'' I I Z S.F. Ge r(111-L- 1lef V._ t rs lt1+w 2 ' 5 S.F. H ll]� -`7f-gj r5 �4'X3`y r�- S.F. I S.F. J S.F. K S.F. L S.F. M S.F. N S.F. 0 S.F. P S.F. QS.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. V S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. (1) Total Existing Hardcover _ S.F. Excludable Hardcover See Cit Code Sec 78-1684 : 0111111111gralZIMMINIi ►i ._ R► S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover _ I Q() S.F. (3) Net Existing Hardcover [Subtract line(2)from line(1)1 S.F.3 (4) Total Lot Area I$, jO S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [(3)_(4)] ( (0 35 (Proposed Hardcover next page) Last Updated: July 2018 Note:This is an information sheet only,every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the information contained herein; however,if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code,the Code provisions will prevail. Page 8 of 9 City of Orono 1:it:04i, Hardcover Calculation Worksheet L : Property Address: �1ii .-r-� --L[t Undin �`''s�,oa` Prepared by: - c ', (.1... —Ali— Date: ! . _ , Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one Tier 1 + ier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 2: PROPOSED HARDCOVER In the following table, identify all items of proposed hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to site plan or survey (must accompany this form). Include all existing hardcover items that are intended to remain, as well as all proposed hardcover items that will be added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict proposed hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Total uare Feet) ( q (Example) (Garage) (24'x 30') (720 S.F.) Ajt0u5r. 2.41")(1#2:%" 1+052. S.F. B (�Lt X.7J(' �ci21 S.F. C bhMcku fi-prix• (Q )( e' (,00?„J S.F. D rcr�t CGnCre.-f.Stbbp In°X fn'3" 2,5.5 S.F. E �rtrti �, 7)(3. 2271�#'S`' 11S.F. F tni- L_..� Li1rS prof; Z 7 S.F. G b: ' °K Z ' 1 .5 S.F. H ''.47,17/.1., p"-!�ty a ), tt •'�►��yy:�� V�. �_ S.F. i 0 a, (�ec>z.,s r51� be. Maui 'KID t S.F. J S.F. K S.F. L S.F. M S.F. N S.F. O S.F. P S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. V S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. (1) Total Proposed Hardcover 3,2,72; S.F. Excludable Hardcover(See Ci Code Sec 78-1684): G. Flint 1b0 cv- buil , 100 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover - 16C S.F. i (3) Net Proposed Hardcover [Subtract line(2)from line(1)] 3j1.. S.F. (4) Total Lot Area 1%(150 S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [(3)_(4)] I W `1"z L Last Updated: July 2018 Note:This is an information sheet only,every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the information contained herein;however,if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code, the Code provisions will prevail, Page 9 of 9 RUN DATE:02/25/2019 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:1 38 07-117-23 13 0206 38 07-117-23 24 0017 38 07-117-23 24 0042 CITY OF ORONO M L GILMER&J C CHURCH LOREN F SCHOENZEIT ET AL 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 4440 FOREST LAKE LANDING 4480 FOREST LAKE LANDING ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 CITY OF ORONO MICHELE L GILMER LOREN F SCHOENZEIT P 0 BOX 66 4440 FOREST LAKE LANDING 4480 FOREST LAKE LANDING CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 13 0211 38 07-117-23 24 0027 38 07-117-23 24 0043 CITY OF ORONO PAUL GRAVES&LAURA GRAVES SI ANDERSON JR&D ANDERSON 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 1146 WILDHURST TR 1131 WILDHURST TR ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 CITY OF ORONO PAUL GRAVES&LAURA GRAVES STEVEN I ANDERSON JR PO BOX 66 8634 VALLEY VIEW CT DANIELLE ANDERSON CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 CHANHASSEN MN 55317 1131 WILDHURST TR MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 13 0214 38 07-117-23 24 0029 38 07-117-23 24 0044 CITY OF ORONO ANDREA J YANKOUPE MICHAEL S WEAR&BRIT S WEAR 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 1085 WILDHURST TR 1134 WILDHURST TR ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 CITY OF ORONO ANDREA J YANKOUPE MICHAEL S WEAR P 0 BOX 66 1085 WILDHURST TR 1134 WILDHURST TR CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 13 0216 38 07-117-23 24 0030 38 07-117-23 24 0045 RITA JANE ZEBECK T M MCKENNEY&E M ROBERTS ANA M CARTER REVOC TRUST 998 WILDHURST TR 1045 WILDHURST TR 1006 WILDHURST TR ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 RITA JANE ZEBECK EILEEN M ROBERTS ANA E&MATTHEW E CARTER 4658 CARLTON DUNES DR#14 7010 295TH ST E 1006 WILDHURST TR AMELIA ISLAND FL 32034 CANNON FALLS MN 55009 MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 13 0217 38 07-117-23 24 0031 38 07-117-23 24 0046 PETER J&LISA M V RYSKAMP VIOLETTA KORABEL ILONA J PETERSON 1000 WILDHURST TR 1035 WILDHURST TR 1074 WILDHURST TR ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 PETER J RYSKAMP VIOLETTA KORABEL KENNETH C PETERSON LISA M V RYSKAMP 742 REGENCY LANE E 1074 WILDHURST TR 1000 WILDHURST TR HOPKINS MN 55343 MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 24 0005 38 07-117-23 24 0036 38 07-117-23 24 0047 TIMOTHY 3 LINE&LORIE LINE CITY OF ORONO TIMOTHY&LORIE LINE 4445 FOREST LAKE LANDING 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 4,415 FOREST LAKE LANDING ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55364 TIMOTHY LINE&LORIE LINE CITY OF ORONO TIMOTHY&LORIE LINE 4445 FOREST LAKE LANDING ATTN CITY ADMINISTRATOR 4415 FOREST LAKE LANDING MOUND MN 55364 PO BOX 66 MOUND MN 55364 ORONO MN 55323 38 07-117-23 24 0007 38 07-117-23 24 0037 38 07-117-23 24 0050 BRIAN&SANDRA RASMUSSEN TRT S W&M J ERIKSON G R BLOOM&T A BLOOM 1186 WILDHURST TR 4455 FOREST LAKE LANDING 4475 FOREST LAKE LANDING ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 BRIAN D RASMUSSEN SANFORD&MARGARET ERIKSON GEORGE R BLOOM _ SANDRA J RASMUSSEN 4455 FOREST LAKE LANDING THERESA A BLOOM 1186 WILDHURST TR MOUND MN 55364 4475 FOREST LAKE LANDING MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 24 0011 38 07.117-23 24 0038 ROBIN E WOOLEY&LORI WOOLEY JON D BLACKSTONE ET AL - 1080 WILDHURST TR 4465 FOREST LAKE LANDING ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 ROBIN E WOOLEY&LORI WOOLEY JON D BLACKSTONE 1080 WILDHURST TR 4465 FOREST LAKE LANDING MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 24 0015 38 07-117-23 24 0040 T D BARTA&1 BARTA S E PRAWER&J C PRAWER 4460 FOREST LAKE LANDING 4470 FOREST LAKE LANDING ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 THOMAS D BARTA STEVEN E PRAWER JANICE BARTA 8313 W FRANKLIN 100 3RD AVE S#1705 ST LOUIS PARK MN 55426 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55401 38 07-117-23 24 0016 38 07-117-23 24 0041 AMY SULLIVAN-TEELE H R ZUCKMAN&L ZUCKMAN 4450 FOREST LAKE LANDING 1090 WILDHURST TR ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 AMY SULLIVAN-TEELE HARTLEY&LINDA ZUCKMAN 4450 FOREST LAKE LANDING 1090 WILDHURST TR MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases.Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available.The viewer should understand,however,that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties,either express or implied,or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. 1 Henrepm Hennepin County Locate & NotifyMap Date: 2,2512019 1003 1003 l/ 1001 i95 Bpi y P I lap® G�? f: .... IIdhurs`t 71 .P'-- r.. --A 1625. ny \y i Phi r s i ? '9,98 „Z tii } 1045 Fr '03? k' 10$0„ 01Y nE 1046 11341# ,” 4(744:-. /4;e4,?°; 4:''4,,,:' \ ,>r 4-{UO 9I G '4444 - , „." 1134 . r 1 i t 4T(i/ 11-1 tI t - i :.'$,tel*.,I... t is .. :'f f 1185 .+�'F~' - III 1206 ,, �.. 1214 ^ �: :.. : Iac, ,f Buffer Size: 500 0 50 100 200 Feet Map Comments: l i l i l l l i l 4470 Forest Lake Landing This das (i) 's furnshed 'AS IS' with norepresentatonasto completeness oiraccuracy;(i)Is fum•shedwithnowarranty of any kod; and (ii) Is notsuitable for bgal,engineering orsuneying purposes.Hennepin County shal not be liable far anydamag e,injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information,contact Hennepin CountyGlS Office 300 6th Street South,Minneapolis,M N 55487/gis.info@hennepin.us Date Application Received: March 1, 2019 -oO A V,O Date Application Considered as Complete: April 3, 2019 l 120-Day Review Period Expires: August 1, 2019 G> To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members likEsxo4�" Dustin Rief,City Administrator From: Jeremy Barnhart, Community Development Director Date: April 15, 2019 Subject: #LA19-000018,Chris and Rachel Bollis, 350 Stubbs Bay Road North, Preliminary Plat Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting preliminary plat approval to split 10.21 acres into two buildable lots. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval, subject to conditions. Staff's analysis can be found on page 3. Background The project area was recently a portion of the Kintyre Preserve subdivision in 2015-2016. That subdivision was allowed to expire. The applicants now propose the splitting of 350 Stubbs Bay Road North into two buildable lots. There is currently one house on the property. Access will be provided via an existing outlot that meets the width requirements. The project area is 10.21 acres, including 4.69 acres of wetland. The delineations were approved last fall by the MCWD. Currently, access to the site is via a gravel driveway through the existing outlot. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-420- Lot Area/Width: Dry Gross Dry buildable Wetlands Frontage Frontage area Buildable requirement requirement (acres) (Feet) (acres) (acres) (Feet) (acres) Lot 1 2.44 2.03 2 0.41 367 200 149 (200 Lot 2 7.77 3.49 2 4.28 adjusted) 200 Section 78-1403-Structural Building Coverage: Both lots are proposed to be larger than 2.0 acres, structural coverage does not apply. Section 78-1680 and 78-1700-Hardcover Calculations: The subject parcels are in the exempt tier and therefore are not restricted with respect to hardcover. FILE#LA19-000018 April 15,2019 Page 2 of 3 Septic System Status Septic reports have been provided for three of the four required sites. Staff has requested a compliance report for the system that is currently being used to support Lot 2. Analysis Conformity with 2010 - 2030 Orono Community Management Plan. The 2010-2030 Comprehensive Plan guides the property for Low Density Residential,0.5 to 2 units per acre. The proposal involves creation of 2 lots. The proposal is consistent with the comprehensive plan. Conformity with RR-1B Zoning District Standards. The property is currently zoned RR-1B One Family Rural Residential (2.0 acre). Three delineated wetlands on the property do not impact available buildable areas of the lots. The property is outside the MUSA boundary. Relationship to Surrounding Development. The proposed lots are consistent in character with the neighboring lots,though most of them are much larger(3.75 acres to 16.44 and 42 acres,all gross) Parks/Trails. Park dedication will be required for the one new lot. No trails are proposed. This proposal requires flexibility from a number of platting requirements including: Pavement width, Cul de sac(a hammerhead is proposed)and lot width. Lot area meets the standards, but is a unique configuration. Lot area. Lot area for lot 1 meets the standard (2 acres, dry buildable), though the lot shape is unique. The finger area,about 1/3 of an acre,is intended to add acreage to the lot,while preserving the home on Lot 2. The buildable envelope (exclusive of setbacks) of Lot 1 is approximately .89 acres. Pavement width. The use of the gravel driveway by three lots will trigger the upgrade of this driveway to a private road. The road will need to be paved to city standards, per section 82-281. The standard also requires a paved width of 24 feet,the plans suggest 20 feet wide. The applicant has suggested that the width is necessary to preserve trees along the property line. Cul de sac. The private road is proposed to terminate in a hammerhead type turnaround. While the hammerhead is supported by the fire chief(Exhibit E, attached), Section 82-283 requires dead end streets to terminate in a cul de sac. The cul de sac is necessary for delivery trucks, garbage, school busses and other large vehicles to easily turn around, in addition to fire and ambulance use. The Commission should discuss whether a deviation from the cul de sac requirement is appropriate. While delivery trucks will likely use individual houses driveways,refuse haulers typically pick up trash in the street. Lot width. Both lots touch the access road, sharing the 20 feet of pavement width. Lot width is measured at the building setback line. Lot 1 has over 360 feet of frontage. The building setback line for Lot 2 falls within a wetland easement. In these situations, the Council has supported flexibility by measuring the width outside of the wetland,but parallel to the front lot line. When applied to this project,the width of Lot 2 is 200 feet. Wetlands/ wetland Impacts. To access the site, the driveways to both lots will go through a wetland buffer. Some statement from the watershed district will be necessary to support that configuration. It is recommended that the private road be extended through the wetland buffer, to consolidate drives through the wetland. The preliminary plat shows a 40 foot wetland buffer FILE#LA19-000018 April 15,2019 Page 3 of 3 along the large wetland to the east side of the site,and a 30 foot wetland buffer along the wetland in the west of the site. These buffer requirements are consistent with watershed rules. Public Comments To date,no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find the flexibility requested (cul de sac, road width) appropriate? 2. Does the Planning Commission have comment on the lot configuration? 3. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval of the subdivision, with the following conditions: 1. The private road terminate in a cul de sac. 2. Provision of a septic compliance report that supports the second site on lot 2. 3. Expansion of the road width to 24 feet. 4. Extension of the road, or an easement through the wetland buffer to coordinate the driveways serving the two lots. 5. Watershed approval of driveway through the wetland buffer. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Preliminary Plat Exhibit C. Narrative Exhibit D. Wetland Notice of Decision Exhibit E. Fire Department Comment Exhibit F. Septic Information Exhibit G. Tree Preservation Plan Exhibit H. Mailing information Land Use Application Summary Application Date: 03/01/2019 Address: 350 STUBBS BAY RD LONG LAKE, MN 55356 Parcel Number: 3211823420006 Land Use Number: LA19-000018 Application Submitted Property Owner By: Owner: Name: CHRISTOPHER W BOLLIS & RACHEL A BOLLIS Address: 350 STUBBS BAY RD N LONG LAKE, MN 55356 Applicant: Name: Chris and Rachel Bollis Company: Address: 200 stubbs bay rd Orono, MN 55356 bombollis@gmail.com Contact Information: Associated Contact: George W Stickeny gstickney@cbburnet.com Associated Contact: Charlie Wiemerslage cwiemerslage@sathre.com Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Project Description: 2 lot subdivision Land Use Application Amendmend Application Type: Appeal of Admin Decision Concept Application Conditional Use Permit =_1 Site Plan Application Subdivision Application kei Subdivision Exception Vacation Application Variance Application ":_J • Applicant Signature: SYMBOL LEGEND , E ZONING DISTRICT STANDARDS .1140/LOT AREA,V 20 Si x % PLAN DruESIGN DATA/� /� tE t.J,,I It_ , , d/_ rry ---,- [7, i./c\\.e., VA ' \ F �j ie''''''' S '.11 /*� . i..,,7 , L Eli \ JD} O 1.'''WIaM F '' y 'I e PRE➢ME . 1ou{^ '.«gym"' — �B. I L ,_,,,... f / f ARR le 2SINGLE_AMLV LOTS SCLLE III FEET • • • ai \__ � i ( ` N 5r T ( I ,,') €, f A ill r,e. ,, .----1- c v ECT NC __ w o-AULP F''''" �.,� ,o,�s EE,177: .o, .«P,,..�.d,.tt'TS m. T. h :o d,. ,SOT PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN o,,. � � SATHRE-BERGQUIST,INC. ORONO, 2 LOT SPLIT-02-2619 0p 111' -- 'oN..E m.,TE� ,� lPfv r o '.� �' �� MINNESOTA CHRIS BOLLIS Narrative Proposed 2 lot subdivision of 350 Stubbs Bay Rd. Lot 1 will be a proposed 2.44 acres in total with 2.03 contiguous dry acres. Lot 1 will be a new building site. Lot 2 will be a proposed 7.77 acres in total with 3.49 contiguous dry acres. The existing house on lot 1 will remain. With the proposed Tree Preservation plan/Private Drive layout, this project is in keeping with the surrounding neighborhood's character and privacy. Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Decision Local Government Unit(LGU) Address Minnehaha Creek Watershed District 15320 Minnetonka Blvd Minnetonka,MN 55345 1. PROJECT INFORMATION Applicant Name Project Name Date of Application Application Number Chris Bollis 350 Stubbs Bary Road 10/3/18 W18-33 ® Attach site locator map Type of Decision: ® Wetland Boundary or Type ❑No-Loss ❑ Exemption ❑ Sequencing ❑ Replacement Plan ❑ Banking Plan Technical Evaluation Panel Findings and Recommendation(if any): ® Approve ❑ Approve with conditions ❑ Deny Summary(or attach): Ben Carlson (BWSR) attended field verification and agreed with the revised boundary. No other TEP comments received. 2. LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNIT DECISION Date of Decision: 10/19/18 ® Approved ❑ Approved with conditions(include below) ❑ Denied LGU Findings and Conclusions(attach additional sheets as necessary): Chris Bollis has applied for wetland boundary&type confirmation for the wetlands located at 350 Stubbs Bay Road in the City of Long Lake, Hennepin County, Minnesota(PID: 3211823420006). The boundary/type approval was requested on October 2, 2018. A wetland delineation was conducted by Jacobson Environmental on September 25, 2018. A complete delineation report and WCA application were submitted to MCWD on October 3, 2018. Three wetlands was delineated on site. Wetland Number Circular 39 Eggers and Reed Basin 1 1/4 Seasonally flooded basin/deep marsh Basin 2 1/3 Seasonally flooded basin/shallow marsh/hardwood swamp Basin 3 1 Seasonally flooded basin MCWD and BWSR reviewed the boundaries in the field on October 5, 2018. The boundaries of the wetland were adjusted as shown in the attached revised delineation figure to move two flags 2 feet up on Basin 1. The flags were located on the portion of wetland 1 south of the driveway and culvert, on BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 1 of 3 the two flags furtherst to the north east. MCWD approves the wetland boundaries and types as shown in the attached revised boundary and type figure from the original submittal.This decision is valid for five years. A future project located on this property may require a permit from the MCWD. For Replacement Plans using credits from the State Wetland Bank: Bank Account# Bank Service Area County Credits Approved for Withdrawal(sq. ft. or nearest .01 acre) Replacement Plan Approval Conditions. In addition to any conditions specified by the LGU, the approval of a Wetland Replacement Plan is conditional upon the following: ❑ Financial Assurance: For project-specific replacement that is not in-advance,a financial assurance specified by the LGU must be submitted to the LGU in accordance with MN Rule 8420.0522, Subp. 9 (List amount and type in LGU Findings). ❑ Deed Recording: For project-specific replacement,evidence must be provided to the LGU that the BWSR "Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants" and "Consent to Replacement Wetland" forms have been filed with the county recorder's office in which the replacement wetland is located. ❑ Credit Withdrawal: For replacement consisting of wetland bank credits,confirmation that BWSR has withdrawn the credits from the state wetland bank as specified in the approved replacement plan. Wetlands may not be impacted until all applicable conditions have been met! LGU Authorized Signature: Signing and mailing of this completed form to the appropriate recipients in accordance with 8420.0255, Subp. 5 provides notice that a decision was made by the LGU under the Wetland Conservation Act as specified above. If additional details on the decision exist,they have been provided to the landowner and are available from the LGU upon request. Name Title Elizabeth Showalter Permitting Technician Signature Date Phone Number and E-mail 10/19/18 (952)641-4518 '""`"`""'"ft-- eshowalter@minnehahacreek.org THIS DECISION ONLY APPLIES TO THE MINNESOTA WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT. Additional approvals or permits from local, state, and federal agencies may be required. Check with all appropriate authorities before commencing work in or near wetlands. Applicants proceed at their own risk if work authorized by this decision is started before the time period for appeal (30 days)has expired. If this decision is reversed or revised under appeal,the applicant may be responsible for restoring or replacing all wetland impacts. This decision is valid for three years from the date of decision unless a longer period is advised by the TEP and specified in this notice of decision. 3. APPEAL OF THIS DECISION Pursuant to MN Rule 8420.0905,any appeal of this decision can only be commenced by mailing a petition for appeal,including applicable fee,within thirty(30)calendar days of the date of the mailing of this Notice to the following as indicated: Check one: BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 2 of 3 El Appeal of an LGU staff decision. Send ❑ Appeal of LGU governing body decision. petition and$100 fee to: Send petition and$500 filing fee to: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Executive Director 15320 Minnetonka Blvd Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Minnetonka,MN 55345 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155 4. LIST OF ADDRESSEES ® SWCD TEP member: Stacey Lijewski-stacey.lijewski@co.hennepin.mn.us ® BWSR TEP member: Ben Carlson-ben.carlson@state.mn.us ❑ LGU TEP member(if different than LGU Contact): • DNR TEP Becky Horton-becky.horton@state.mn.us ❑ DNR Regional Office: Jason Spiegel-Jason.spiegel@state.mn.us ❑ WD or WMO(if applicable): ® Applicant(notice only)and Landowner(if different): Chris Bollis-bombollis@gmail.com ® Members of the public who requested notice(notice only): Wayne Jacobson- jacobsonenv@msn.com ® Corps of Engineers Project Manager(notice only): Justin Berndt- Justin.T.Berndt@usace.army.mil ❑ BWSR Wetland Bank Coordinator(wetland bank plan applications only) 5. MAILING INFORMATION >For a list of BWSR TEP representatives: www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/workareas/WCA areas.pdf >For a list of DNR TEP representatives: www.bwsr.state.mn.us/wetlands/wca/DNR TEP contacts.pdf >Department of Natural Resources Regional Offices: NW Region: NE Region: Central Region: Southern Region: Reg.Env.Assess.Ecol. Reg.Env.Assess.Ecol. Reg.Env.Assess. Reg.Env.Assess.Ecol. Div.Ecol.Resources Div.Ecol.Resources Ecol. Div.Ecol.Resources 2115 Birchmont Beach Rd. 1201 E.Hwy.2 Div.Ecol.Resources 261 Hwy. 15 South NE Grand Rapids,MN 1200 Warner Road New Ulm,MN 56073 Bemidji,MN 56601 55744 St.Paul,MN 55106 For a map of DNR Administrative Regions, see: http://files.dnr.state.mn.us/aboutdnr/dnr regions.pdf >For a list of Corps of Project Managers: www.mvp.usace.army.mil/regulatory/default.asp?pageid=687 or send to: US Army Corps of Engineers St. Paul District,ATTN: OP-R 180 Fifth St. East, Suite 700 St. Paul, MN 55101-1678 >For Wetland Bank Plan applications, also send a copy of the application to: Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Wetland Bank Coordinator 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155 6. ATTACHMENTS In addition to the site locator map, list any other attachments: ® Approved wetland boundaries BWSR Forms 7-1-10 Page 3 of 3 Figure 1 Site Map ti " _ , '11-'',,,..,—:,, ihAveN_ 6 0 ;& 41,4 y h a Q N a W FA �..,�3.. tt; $ in4� PSN . g os o — Fodor �',� ono ,eata:Btvd W _ :Wayzata BlvdsW Long, La 9 CO 350 Stubbs Bay Rd, _ -g a b`'d 0 Long Lake,MN 55356 Grand Ave m a ow°Rd Bayside Rd Watertavm Rd • Devin In Stubbs Bay $ g ,a ti Wg C T m 3 " Bayside Rd - ' r 1_ r° r, $"5P+ b 4 „¢' ;,. 48} " .. fox 54 2000 feet 500 m a .'.'-_;','..4"..‘,., , F,..e'N In ®2018 HERE,©OpenSVeeiMap Figure 5 Delineation Map Map layers N o`Do ® Sample Point:l mt ^a- ;� 27 hennepin_county_parcels e:}, ; , � '' Contour_2f_3m:1 ' '°fry s t ° C'" ��0 .015 .03 .045 • ` ` �rFr 4i t� Miles • Wetland Boundary • • e 97o Basin 2 s c 4.18 acres r.� 1. 4.0 CuCulvert rt 2-2-UP w /.._ rn .2.2-WET 5 - 1°1-wET'•, -1 uP 0 1113 3 �. acres Basin 1 N0.375 acres From: Chris Bollis To: Jeremy Barnhart Subject: Fwd:Orono land project Date: Wednesday,April 3,2019 1:23:10 PM Attachments: 1461960826 Instagram.pnq 1461958277 sauare-linkedin.onq PastedGraphic-3.tiff Jeremy, Please see the forwarded comments from James about the hammerhead turnaround. --chris Forwarded message From: James Van Eyll<jvaneyll@longlakemn.gov> Date: Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 11:58 AM Subject: Re: Orono land project To: Chris Bollis<christopherbollis@gmail.com> Hi Chris, The 120' Hammerhead appears to be to the correct dimensions. It doesn't show the radius of the corners. Also this will have to be kept clear of snow and debris at all times. The drawing as is meets to our standard for turn around access for the two homes off of this fire department access road. Thanks James Van Eyll Fire Chief Long Lake Fire Department jvaneyll longlakemn.gov f w in On Mar 4, 2019, at 9:03 PM, Chris Bollis <christopherbollis@gmail.com> wrote: Hi James, Please see the attached plan for the 2 lot subdivision of 350 Stubbs bay rd that we met about last October. We have laid out the private drive design per our discussion with the 20'width and hammerhead turnaround terminus,designed to meet the state fire code requirements. At your convenience could you please write a brief statement I can forward to City Staff supporting the design? Best, 'ris Bollis On T -,Oct 23,2018 at 6:38 PM James Van Eyll<jvaneyll a longlakemn.gov>wrote: Yes Lcng Lake Fire Station 1 340 Willow Dr Sent from ' y iPhone On Oct 23,20 at 16:27,Chris<christopherbollis n gmail.com>wrote: OK I will se:you at 11.I'm assuming at Long Lake fire Station? Sent from my i'.one On Oct 23,2018,at :46 PM,James Van Eyll<jvaneyll@longlakemn.gov>wrote: Hi That works for me James Sent from my iPhone On Oct 23,2018,at 13:32,Chris Bollis<christopherbollisaamail.com> wrote: How about 11:00 tomorrow? �\ --Chris On Tue,Oct 23,2018 at 10:47 AM James•Van Ey11 <jvaneyll n Ionglakemn.gov>wrote: \\ Hi Chris, Yes,I am open this afternoon or anytime after 0 tomorrow. Thanks James Van Eyll Fire Chief Long Lake Fire Department jvaneyll@longlakemn.gov Ai1 Oil El I � 1 P h 0 e { <1461960826_Instagram.png> <image002.jpg> <image003-1.jpg> <1461958277_square-linkedin.png> <PastedGraphic-3.tiffl <KP 022619 (1).pdf Joseph Olson D.B.A. Rusty Olson's--Soil and Percolation Testing Joseph J. Olson--MPCA License #810 11481 Riverview Rd. NE, Hanover, MN 55341 (763) 498-8779 fax (763) 498-8290 Revised April 3,2019 Bollis Property Proposed lot 1 Orono,Hennepin County This on-site Sewage Treatment System is partially designed for a Type 1,five-bedroom home in accordance with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Chapter 7080 and local ordinances. Once the house size,location and septic primary and future sites are chosen this design can be completed. The periodically saturated soils were located at 16-20 Inches(mottled soil).Due to the periodically saturated soils,a pressurized mound system will need to be installed to treat the septic effluent.The bottom of the treatment area must be located at least 3' above the saturated soils. The soils at a depth of 12"have a percolation rate averaging 5 MPI. A pumping chamber will need to be installed to lift the effluent to the treatment area.The power supply and switches must be located outside the manhole and pumping chamber in a weatherproof enclosure.A warning device must be installed with a light and sound device;this is in case of a pump failure. Use 7/32-inch perforations on the laterals. Keep all heavy equipment off of the proposed treatment areas before and after construction.The treatment area must be fenced off before construction begins.This Design is not valid&the System will need to be relocated if failure to protect the areas proposed for the On-Site Sewage Treatment systems occurs. With proper installation and maintenance,this system should have no problem in treating septic effluent effectively.Nothing other than gray water,(laundry,showers,etc.)Human water and toilet tissue should be disposed of into the septic tanks. Iron filters cannot go into the septic system.Garbage disposals are not recommended.Additives must not be used they may cause harmful damage to your septic system. It is recommended that you pump the septic tanks every two years. Sincerely, .,./.7d---------Joseph J.Olson fL ar 6--(ii) ..""A "Pr\ \ l l # \ Sys ° j. \N\ / ,. ;Nt2\> // J/Ar\1i C, .."may �' ,,s { " J am"`- \ . ..,` I \\\\/> 1 ytv- ', 50 c4 - \\ 1 t �r- . ..... f 1 x" y o .. 1 rY66 r__,__ - -- -9,6 t 6-----6 A-A':' 1-. r `9 , w 35fON X3' t 1 if'- I a ,...--- ..., ..... ...... I (,, c.,) Ws sr, ( ...4 4b. r-- C ' N4:::'''''' .-. i *,, ,,f;::,',,,,,:. It.:.....W.A1,1- 30 -•— o. ' I 13 Er 0.1 fit m NR1 � j #s y, W ;; CO 1 \,, 1 f 1 I I 1 .. I Minnesota Pollution OSTP Design Summary Worksheet UNIVERSITY Control Agency , OF MINNESOTA Property Owner/Chent:'Bollis Property Project 10:1 'v 03.19.:5 Site Address:'Lot 6(site Ai Date:I 6/23.15 1. DESIGN FLOW AND TANKS i A. Design Flow: I 750 Gallons Per Day(GPDr Note: The estimated design flow is considered c pegk flow rate B. Septic Tanks: including a safety factor. For long term performance. the average doily flow is recommended to be< 60' of this value. Minimum Code Required Septic Tank Capac€ty:J 2250 I Gallons.In L j ,Tanks or Compartments jRecommended Septic Tank Capacity:; 2250 Gallons.in ! 2 'Tanks or Compartments Effluent Screen:I no 1 Alarm:' no C. Holding Tanks Only: Minimum Code Required Capacity: Gallons.in ii Tanks Designer Recommended Capacity: 'Gallons.in Tanks Type of High Level Alarm: I D. Pump Tank z Capacity(Code Minimu€i):' 'Gallons Pump Tank 2 Capacity(Code Minirnumi: 'Gallons Pump Tank 1 Capacity(Designer Recr: ' ,Gallons Pump Tank 2 Capacity(Designer Recc ; 'Gallons Pump 11 'GPM Total Head ,ft Pump 2I € 1GPM Total Head l I ft Supply Pipe Dia.' Jin Dose Volume:i 'gal Supply Pipe Dia.' 'in Dose Volume:' Igai 2. SYSTEM TYPE Trench D Bed , :ricuntl At Grade 2, Cr-as,ti D+sti,^.:,t:i is Press-re Distrc,iii,i-eve. :�Dressare Vast---wDan(,neve( On 0 1-04.ng rag 0 her I I 'Selection Required Bencntnark Elevation: j Sea Level Vt Benchmark Location: I I System Type Type of Distnbution Media: `:i'Type I Typexan5e axe U Type UI ?`Type IV Type V I — _Re,�ste>ed Teou^ent r+ieaia i { i 3. SITE EVALUATION: A. Depth to Limiting Layer:! 16 r 1.3 1 jin ) 'ft 8. measured Lana Slope ::' 6.0 C. Elevation of Limiting Layer: 981.7 1 D. Soil Texture:! Loam I E. Loc.of Restncive Elevation:' F. y . Loading Rate:I 0.60 I Soil Hd 'GPD'ft` G. Minimum Required Separation:' 36 'in 3.0 lft H. Perc Rate: 5.0 'WI I. Code Maximum Depth of System: ( Mound (inCommj ents: 4. DESIGN SUMMARY Trench Design Summary Dispersal Areal 'ft' Sidewatl Depth; ,in Trench Width' 'ft Total Lineal Feet' 'ft Number of Trenches' 1 l Code Maximum Trench Depthj lin Contour Loading Rate' 'ft N Designers Max Trencn Depth' din Bed Design Summary Absorption Areal 'ft` Depth of sidewall' r i �.n Code Maximum Bed Depthj lin 1 Bed Width' 'ft Bed Length; ! j ng i ,ft Designer's Max bed Depthj 'in Minnesota Pollution OSTP Design Summary Worksheet UNIVERSITY Control Agency + `:.. OF MINNESOTA a,;r Mound Design Summary Absorption Bed Areal 630,0 1ft' Bed Length' 63.0 ift Bed Width' 10.0 Ift Absorption Width.' 20.0 Jft Clean Sand Lift !ft Berm Width 10-1.;.11 ift Upslope Berm Width! 11.0 !ft Downslope Berm Width I 27,1 Ift Endstope Berm Width' 12.1 !ft Total System Length! 87.1 Ift Total System Widtht 42.2 !ft Contour Loading Rate! 12.0 1gal%ft At-Grade Design Summary Absorption Bed Width! 'ft Absorption Bed Length Ift I System HeighY1 ft Contour Loading Rate! Igatift Upstope Berm Width! !ft Downslope Berm Width! Ift Endslope Berm Width! 'ft System Length! lit System Width! Ift Level Es Equal Pressure Distribution Summary No.of Perforated Laterals! 3 ' Perforation 5 acro ! 3 I p g ift aerforation Diameter 7/32 lin Lateral Diameter! 2.00 m Min.Delivered Volume! 0 gat Maximum Delivered Volume) 188 'gat Non-Level and Unequal Pressure Distribution Summary 1 Elevation Pipe Volume Pipe Length Perforation Size i { (ft) Pipe Size iinl, igalrfti ift, lint I Spacing iftl I Spacing iini Laterals Lateral 2 I Minimum Delivered Volume Lateral 3 } i 111! I I Igal Lateral 4 1f 1 Maximum Delivered Volume aterat 5 I i tern l 6 I I gal I 5. Additional Info for Type IV/Pretreatment Design A. Calculate the organic loading 1. Organic Loading to Pretreatment Unit =Design Flow X Estimated BOD in mg L in the effluent x 8.35 :1.000.000 ! 'god x ! lmg,L X 8.35 1.000.000- I I lbs BOD:day 2. Type of Pretreatment Unit Being Installed: I 3. Calculate Soil Treatment System Organic Loading 800 concentration after pretreatment 1 Bottom Area - lbs.day:ft I (mg/l.X 8.35 4 1.000.000 + 1 (ft:._ I � 1tbsrdayift' Comments/Special Design Considerations: i ► � I hereby certify that I have completed this work in acc rdance with all applicable ordinances.rules and laws. Joseph J Olson iDesigneri j 810 06/23/15 IStgnaturel ILicense=i iDatei OSTP Mound Design UNIVERSITY Minnesota Pollution I ERSITY Control Agency Worksheet > 1 % Slope � INNESOTA 1. SYSTEM SIZING: Project ID: v 03.19,15! A. Design Row: I 750 GPD TABLE IXa i B. Soil Loading Rate: I 0.60 !GPD/ft` LOADING RATES FOR DETERMINING BOTTOM ABSORPTION AREA AND ABSORPTION RATIOS USING PERCOLATION TESTS C. Depth to Limiting Condition: ! 1.3 Ift TreatmentLevelC Treatment Level A.A•2.6.' Abw non 1 Prrcoistson Rate D �O 1 InnI Mound D. Percent Land Slope: 6.0 G {Map Area toarhn8� Wound Art. I Rate Absorption Rate Absorption (i/pa/tri Ratio i Ratio E. Design Media Loading Rate: I 1.2 IGPD/ft2 . l >t i ' F. Mound Absorption Ratio: I 2.00 I i 1.2 1 1.6 1 I Table I a- =*a^, -e se 0.6 z t i.s i uz MOUND CONTOUR LOADING RATES; '' 0.78 5 1 1.6 Contour -5='� 0 6 moasuled -Nature•clamed 2 0.78 2 r Marc Rata mound absorption=axes Loading 0.5 2.4 0.78 2 Rate 0.46 2.8 0.6 2.6 SOiiv 1 1:. 13 2 J 2.4 2.5 ;ii 5 0.3 5.3 _rr ----� _.. A.1 121;'}c3 • P 5 r: -1a -.. *Systems with these values are not Type I systems. 1 v'} g : . Contour Loading Rate (linear loading rate) is a recommended value. 2. DISPERSAL MEDIA SIZING A. Calculate Dispersal Bed Area: Design Flow: Design Media Loading Rate =ft' I750 !GPD : I 1.2 IGPD/ft' = I 625 Ift: If a larger dispersal media area is desired, enter size:! 630 Ift` B. Enter Dispersal Bed Width: I 10.0 Ift Can not exceed 10 feet C. Calculate Contour Loading Rate: Bed Width X Design Media Loading Rate I 10 Ift2 X I 1.2 I GPD/ft' = I 12.0 !gal/ft Can not exceed Table 1 D. Calculate Minimum Dispersal Bed Length: Dispersal Bed Area : Bed Width = Bed Length I 630 Iftz : I 10.0 Ift =I 63.0 !ft 3. ABSORPTION AREA SIZING A. Calculate Absorption Width: Bed Width X Mound Absorption Ratio =Absorption Width I 10.0 Ift X I 2.0 I = I 20.0 I ft B. For slopes >1%, the Absorption Width is measured downhill from the upslope edge of the Bed. Calculate Downslope Absorption Width: Absorption Width - Bed Width I 20.0 Ift - I 10.0 Ift =1 10.0 Ift 4. DISTRIBUTION MEDIA: ROCK A. Media Volume: Media Depth below and above pipe X Length X Width 1 0.75 I ft XI 63.0 1ft X ( 10.0 Ift = i 473 l ft` _ 27 = 18 yd' 5. DISTRIBUTION MEDIA: REGISTERED TREATMENT PRODUCTS: CHAMBERS AND EZFLOW A. Enter Dispersal Media: I I B. Enter the Component: Length: I Jft Width: jft Depth:l Ift C. Number of Components per Row= Bed Length divided by Component Length (Round up) II ft ÷ I I ft= J Icomponentsirow D. Actual Bed Length =Number of Components/row X Component Length: I (components X I Ift = I Ift E. Number of Rows=Bed Width divided by Component Width (Round up) II ft- I I ft = I J rows Adjust width so this is an whole number. F. Total Number of Components=Number of Components per Row X Number of Rows II X I I = I (components 6. MOUND SIZING A. Calculate Minimum Clean Sand Lift: 3 feet minus Depth to Limiting Condition = Clean Sand Lift 3.0 ft - I 1.3 I ft =1 1.7 Jft Design Sand Lift (optional): ft B. Calculate Upslope Height: Clean Sand Lift + media depth +cover (1 ft.) = Upslope Height Ii_7 J ft - 0.8 ft -I 1.0 I ft = I 3A Ift C. Select Upslope Berm Multiplier(based on land slope): I 3.23 I LandSlope% I 0 I 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 1 5 I 6 1 7 I 8 I 9 I 10 I 11 I 12 1 Upslope Berm 3:1 3.00 2.91 2.83 2.75 2.68 2.61 2.54 2.48 2.42 2.36 2.31 2.26 2.21 Rato 4:1 4.00 3.85 3.70 3.57 3.45 3.33 3.23 3.12 3.03 2.94 2.86 2.78 2.70 D. Calculate Upslope Berm Width: Multiplier X Upslope Mound Height =Upslope Berm Width I 3.23 I ft XI 3.4 I ft =I 11.0 Ift E. Calculate Drop in Elevation Under Bed: Bed Width X Land Slope = 100= Drop (ft) I10.0 I ft X I 6.0 I % = 100=I 0.60 aft F. Calculate Downslope Mound Height: Upslope Height= Drop in Elevation = Downslope Height 1 3.4 J ft -l 0.60 I ft =1 4.0 Ift G. Select Downslope Berm Multiplier (based on land slope): I 5.26 I LandSlope% 1 0 1 I 2 3 4 I 5 1 6 I 7 I 8 I 9 I 10 I 11 1 12 Downslope I 3:1 3.00 3.09 3.19 3.30: 3.41 3.53 3.66 3.80 3,95 4.11 4.29 4.48 4.69 Berm Ratio 4:1 4.00 4,17 4.35_4.54 4.76 5.00 5.26 5.56 5.88 6.25 6.67 7.14 7.69 H. Calculate Downslope Berm Width: Multiplier X Downslope Height = Downslope Berm Width I5.26 I x I 4.0 Ift H 21,1 Ift L Calculate Minimum Berm to Cover Absorption Area: Downslope Absorption Width -4 feet I 10.0 Ift -I 4 Ift =1 14.0 Ift J. Design Downslope Berm =greater of 4H and 41: I 21.1 Ift K. Select Endslope Berm Multiplier: I 3.00 J (usually 3.0 or 4.0) L. Calculate Endslope Berm X Downslope Mound Height = Endslope Berm Width I 3.00 Ift XI 4.0 Ift =I 12.1 Ift M. Calculate Mound Width: Upslope Berm Width + Bed Width - Downslope Berm Width I11.0 I ft -I 10.0 I ft I 21.1 I ft =I 42.2 Ift N. Calculate Mound Length: Endslope Berm Width + Bed Length - Endslope Berm Width I12.1 Ift *I 63.0 Jft -I 12.1 Ift =1 87.1 Ift 7. MOUND DIMENSIONS (----- .... Upslope (4.D) ! 11.0 I �Endslope (4.L11 ,i*?'_ ,rt:-:1 E,),-----:.1: ;G , Q r 1Endslope 1.1.L1. Li, v- i 12.1 7 10.0 63.0 ! r 12.1; c . � , 21,1 6 _ Downslope (4.J) 1� -1 — ._.) Total Mound Length (4.N) 87.1 4" inspection pipe 18" cover on top 21.1 I Upslope berm (4.D) Dovmslo•e berm (4.J) Y mmi 11.0 '~ M � 12" cover on sides (6" topsoil) Cies, Sarni lift (-1.A)I 1.7 1.----• i.3 1 Absorption Width (3.A1 Note: 1111 20.0 l For 0 to 1% slopes, Absorption Width is measured from the Bedequally in both directions. For slopes >1%, Absorption Width is measured downhill from the upslope edge of the Bed Comments: 1 i I OSTP Mound Materials Worksheet UNIVERSITY ` Minnesota Pollution OF MINNESOTA Control Agency •,_ Project ID: '+03.19.15 A. Calculate Bed (rock) Volume:Bed Length (2.C1 X Bed Width 12.81 X Depth =Volume iftt i I63.0 Ift X I 10.0 Ift X 1.0 - I 630.0 Ift Divide ft by 27 ft:-ydto calculate cubic yards: 630.0 I it 27 - I 23.3 Iyd Add 20 for constructabillty: I 23.3 yd-X 1.2 - I 28.0 Iyd, B. Calculate Clean Sand Volume: Volume Under Rock bed:Average Sand Depth x Media Width a Media Length =cubic feet t•7 Ift X I 10.0 -ft X I 63.0 Ift = j 1081.5 Ift 'For a Mound on a slope from 0.1% Volume from Length=(lUpslope Mound Height- 1 X Absorption Width Beyond Bea X Media Bed Length) I Ift - 1i XI I X I Ift _ II Volume from Width=(lUpslope Mound Height• 11 X Absorption Width Beyond Bed X Media Bed Widtni I I ft •11 X I I X I Ift I Total Clean Sand Volume: Volume from Length-Volume from Width- Volume Under Media 1 .ft - i I ft - I I ft' _ ;ft II For a Mound on a slope greater than 1% Upsiope Volume: I(UpslopelMound Height - 1 i x 3 x Bed Length i-2=cubic feet it 3.4 I ft • 1, X 3.0 ft x I 63.0 I ,-2 = 228.4 lit Downslope Volume: llDownslope Height• 1) x Downslope Absorption Width x Media Length)-2 =cubic feet ll 4.0 i ft• 11 X I 10.0 Ift XI 63.0 )-2 = I 950.3 Ift Endsiope Volume:1Downslope Mound Height• 1 r x 3 x Media Width •cubic feet II 4,0 I ft• 1 1 X 3.0 ft 'x I 10.0 Ift _ I 90.5 Ift Total Clean Sand Volume:Upslope Volume -Downslope Volume -Endslope Volume - Volume Under Media I228.4 I ft - I 950.3 I ft' - I 90.5 I ft - I 1081.5 Ift'- I 2350.6 Ift Divide ft'by 27 ft'tyd'to calculate cubic yards: I 2350.6 I ft- _ 27 _ ' 87.1 Iyd Add 20s for constructability: I 87.1 yd X 1.2 104.5 lyd ' C. Calculate Sandy Berm Volume: Total Berm Volume?approxi:IlAvg•Mound Height-0.5 ft topsoil?x Mound Width x Mound Length(-2 cubic feet II 3.7 I 0.5 ift X I 42,2 Ift X 87.1 i I -2= 5906.5 lit' Total Mound Volume•Clean Sand volume.Rock Volume-cubic feet I 5906,5 I ft` • I 2350.6 I ft' - I 630.0 I ft = 2925.9 lit Divide ft'by 27 ft'!yd to calculate cubic yards: I 2925.9 ft e 27 = '•08.4 yd Add 20ih for constructability: I 108.4 II yd` x 1.2 130.0 yd D. Calculate Topsoil Material Volume:Total Mound Width X Total Mound Length X.5 ft I I 42.2 Ift X I 87.1 Ift X 0.5 ft 1836.2 I Ift' Divide ft-by 27 ft'ryd to calculate cubic yards: I 1836.2 I ft' s 27 I 68.0 Iyd Add 20%for constructability: I 68.0 Iyd' x 1•2 = I - I 81.6 lyd Minnesota Pollution OSTP Design Summary Worksheet UNIVERSITY Control Agency OF MINNESOTA Property OwnerlCiient:Boltis Property Project ID: I v 03.'9.15 Site Address:llot 6(site BI II Date:i 6.'23/15 1. DESIGN FLOW AND TANKS A. Design Flow: i 750 'Gallons Per Day IGPDI Note: The estimated design flow is considered a peak flow rate P including a safety factor.For long term performance, the average B. Septic Tanks: daily flow is recommended to be< 60'7 of this value. Minimum Code Required Septic Tank Capacity:I 2250 I Gallons,in 2 (Tanks or Compartments Recommended Septic Tank Capacity:; 2250 i Gallons.ini II 2 Tanks or Compartments Effluent Screen:' no lI Atarm: no ' C. Holding Tanks Only: Minimum Code Required Capacity: [Gallons.in ITantts Designer Recommended Capacity:1 JGaltons.in 'Tanks Type of High Level Alarm: l D. Pump Tank 1 Capacity ICode Minimums:i Gauons 1 Pump Tank.2 Capacity!Code Mimmumi I 'Gallons Pump Tank I Capacity'Designer Recs: i 'Gallons Pump Tank 2 Capacity(Designer Req: Gallons i I Pump 11 'GPM Total Head Ift Pump 2I IGPM Total Head I Ift Supply Pipe Dia. in Dose Volume:I gal Supply Pipe Dia.! i tin Dose Volume:' 'gal 2. SYSTEM TYPE O Trench 3 Ben (#Mound 3 At-Graoe ' Grav/Di0.tx.trn 4.=rws.-e iii:RxtCr-,rYP Pressure JlitnDUf tln Uheve. "Dnp 3 Mawr Tank O Omer 1 I `Selection Required 9 Benchmaritclevation: Sea Levet Ift + 1 Benchmark Location: ( ; System Type I Type of Distnbution.Media: Type 1 I 7 Dra�ilsra Rc-r `� Type II Type III Type IV Type V I Reg+srrred Treatment'+-lec+a: II I 3. SITE EVALUATION: A. Depth yer: 16 lin I 1.3 Ift B. ,Measured Land Slope :i 6.0 I to Limiting g La , { C. Elevation of Limiting Layer:' 982.3 , D. Soil Texture:r Loam I E. Loc. of Restncive Elevation:I iF. Sod Hyd. Loading Rate: 0.60 GPD/ft G. Minimum Required Separation:! 36 lin 1 3.0 Ift H. aI Pert-.Rate:, 5.0 IMP; i. Code Maximum Depth of System: I Mound lin Comments I 4. DESIGN SUMMARY i Trench Design Summary 'Dispersal Areal ft' Sidewall Depth' +' ir. Trench Width' [ft Total Lineal Feet' ft Numoe cf Trenches ( I Code Maximum Trench Depth' lin Contour Loading Rate' i ft fin Max Trench Depth; Bed Design Summary Absorption Areal 'ft' Depth of sidewastl lin Code Maximum Bed Depth1 lin Bed Width' i 8 ft Bed Length[ Ift i Designers Max Bed Depth! m Minnesota Pollution OSTP Design Summary Worksheet UNIVERSITY Control Agency OF MINNESOTA Mound Design Summary Absorption Bed Areal 630.0 lft: BedLength! 63.0 Ift Bed Width[ 10.0 lit Absorption Width! 20.0 !ft Clean Sand Lift! 1.7 Ift Berm Width 10-1111 If: UpSlope Berm Width! 11.0 Ift Downstope Berm Width ! 21,1 Jft Endstope Berm Width[ 12.1 ft Total System Length! 87.1 Ift Total System Width 42.2 ft Contour Loading Race l 12.4 lgal;ft At-Grade Design Summary Absorption Bed Width! Jft Absorption Bed Length ft System Height' {t Contour Loading Ratel Igat eft Upslope Berm Width! Ift Downstope Berm Widthl Ift Endslope Berm Width! ft System Length! !ft System Width) lit Level Et Equal Pressure Distribution Summary No.of Perforated Laterals! 3 J Perforation Spacing! 3 ft Perforation Diameter! 7/32 lin f , Lateral Diameter! 2.00 lin Nan. Delivered Volume! 0 jgai maximum Delivered Volume' 188 'gal I, Non-Level and Unequal Pressure Distribution Summary Elevation i Pipe Volume Pipe Length Perforation Size (ft) Pipe Size tin) igat/ft) ifti tin) Spacing illi Spacing ill Lateral 1 Minimum Delivered Volume Lateral 2 i Lateral 3 I I ; gal Lateral 4 t l test 5 maximum Delivered Volume drat 6 ( 1 + { ! 'gal I t 15. Additional Info for Type IV/Pretreatment Design A. Calculate the organic loading 1. Organic Loading to Pretreatment Unit =Design Flow X Estimated BOD in mg.L in the efftuent X 8.35:1.000,000 1Bpd >1 I lmg:'L X 8.35-1.000.40i= I I lbs BOD day 2. Type of Pretreatment Unit Being Installed: 3. Calculate Soil Treatment System Organic Loading: BOO concentration after pretreatment_Bottom Area =lbs`day/.ft' I I Img/L X 8.35 4 1,000,000 : 1 eft`_ ! Ws/day, Comments/Special Design Considerations: I � , i hereby certify that I have completed this work in accordance with all applicable ordinances.rules and taws. Joseph J Olson $1Q 06/23/15 (Designer) iSagnaturei (License z; 'Date) OSTP Mound Design .{ ©/ ��QUNIVERSITY Minnesota Poffution Control Agency Worksheet �" 1 !0 p� OF b11NNESOTA - 1. SYSTEM SIZING: Project ID: ~ v 03.19.15 A. Design Flow: 750 GPO TABLE IXa B. Soil Loading Rate: 0.60 GPD/ft1 LOADING RATES FOR DETERMINING BOTTOM ABSORPTION AREA AND ABSORPTION RATIOS USING PERCOLATION TESTS l Treatment Level C Treatment Level A,A-2,B,, C. Depth to Limiting Condition: 1.3 ft Percolation Rate Absorption Absprptnn D. Percent Land Slope: 6.0 % tMwl Area Loading Mound Area Loath Mound Rate Absarpton Rat Absorptsnn I'�nt'I Ratty I ,I Rata E. Design Media Loading Rate: 1.2 GPD/ft" ,:. 1 1 , F. Mound Absorption Ratio: 2.00h- 1.2 1 1,6 1 Table I -a Aar -e,a•c. a.6 2 1 1.6 MOUND CONTOUR LOADING RATES: 0.76 15 1 1.6 Id4dSUt9d '` T4stut4 dGlirGd Contour e`<` 0.6 i 2 0.78 2 i Pert Rate OR mound abwrpocin•at Loading - 0,5 2.4 o 78 2 Rate: I i 0,45 2.6 0.6 2.6 601,1; 1 C, 13 1 31.4 i.6 • _12 1 5 0:3 1 5.3 4 1'ILI,'lp1 ':-c 5.1; "Systems with these values are not Type I systems. 1zc r�o" 5.0• ,f. Contour Loading Rate (linear loading rate) is a recommended value. 2. DISPERSAL MEDIA SIZING A. Calculate Dispersal Bed Area: Design Flow: Design Media Loading Rate = ft` 1 750 IGPD : I 1.2 IGPD/ft` = I 625 Ift` If a larger dispersal media area is desired, enter size:I 630 Ift: B. Enter Dispersal Bed Width: I 10.0 Ift Can not exceed 10 feet C. Calculate Contour Loading Rate: Bed Width X Design Media Loading Rate I10 Ift` X 1 1.2 JGPD/ft: = I 12.0 Igal/ft Con not exceed Table 1 D. Calculate Minimum Dispersal Bed Length: Dispersal Bed Area : Bed Width = Bed Length I630 Ift: = I 10.0 Ift = 63.0 ft 3. ABSORPTION AREA SIZING A. Calculate Absorption Width: Bed Width X Mound Absorption Ratio =Absorption Width I 10.0 Ift X I 2.0 I = I 20.0 Ift B. For slopes >1%, the Absorption Width is measured downhill from the upslope edge of the Bed. Calculate Downslope Absorption Width: Absorption Width - Bed Width I 20.0 Ift - I 10.0 1ft =1 10.0 fit 4. DISTRIBUTION MEDIA: ROCK A. Media Volume: Media Depth below and above pipe X Length X Width i1 0.75 I ft XI 63.0 Ift X 1 10.0 Ift= 1 473 I ft' 27 = I 18 Id 5. DISTRIBUTION MEDIA: REGISTERED TREATMENT PRODUCTS: CHAMBERS AND EZFLOW A. Enter Dispersal Media: i j B. Enter the Component: Length: I Ift Width:( Ift Depth:( Ift C. Number of Components per Row= Bed Length divided by Component Length (Round up) II ft = I I ft= components/row D. Actual Bed Length =Number of Components/row X Component Length: components X ft = ( Ift E. Number of Rows = Bed Width divided by Component Width (Round up) II ft : I I ft = rows Adjust width so this is on whole number. F. Total(Number of Components=Number of Components per Row X Number of Rows I l X I I = i (components 6. MOUND SIZING A. Calculate Minimum Clean Sand Lift: 3 feet minus Depth to Limiting Condition =Clean Sand Lift 3.0 ft - I 1.3 I ft =1 1.7 (ft Design Sand Lift (optional): i (ft B. Calculate Upslope Height: Clean Sand Lift =media depth + cover(1 ft.) = Upslope Height I1.7 (ft 0.8 ft + 1.0 ft = I 3.4 (ft C. Select Upslope Berm Multiplier(based on land slope): I 3.23 I Land Slope% I 0 1 1 I 2 I 3 4 1 5 I 6 I 7 I 8 I 9 10 1 11 1 12 Upslope Berm 3.1 3.00 2.91 2.83 2.75 2.68 2.61 2.54 2.48 2.42 2.36 2.31 2.26 2.21 I Ratio 4:1 4.00 3.85 3.70 3.57 3.45 3.33 3.23 3.12 3.03 2.94 2.86 2.78 2.70 I D. Calculate Upslope Berm Width: Multiplier X Upslope Mound Height =Upslope Berm Width l I3.23 I ft X I 3.4 (ft =( 11.0 (ft E. Calculate Drop in Elevation Under Bed: Bed Width X Land Slope : 100= Drop (ft) ( 10.0 1 f XI 6.0 IW = 100=I 0.60 (ft F. Calculate Downslope Mound Height: Upslope Height- Drop in Elevation = Downslope Height 1 3.4 Ift +I 0.60 (ft =I 4.0 (ft G. Select Downslope Berm Multiplier(based on land slope): I 5.26 i I Land Slope% 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Downslope 3:1 3.00 3.09 3.19 3.30 3.41 3.53 3.66 3.80 3.95 4.11 4.29 4.48 4.69 j Berm Ratio 4:1 4.00 4.17 4.35 4.54 4.76 5.00 5.26 5.56 5.88 6.25 6.67 7.14 7.69 H. Calculate Downslope Berm Width: Multiplier X Downslope Height = Downslope Berm Width I5.26 I x 4.0 ft =I 21.1 (ft I. Calculate Minimum Berm to Cover Absorption Area: Downslope Absorption Width - 4 feet I 10.0 (ft -I 4 (ft =i 14.0 (ft J. Design Downslope Berm=greater of 4H and 41: 21.1 ft K. Select Endslope Berm Multiplier: i 3.00 i (usually 3.0 or 4.0) L. Calculate Endslope Berm X Downslope Mound Height = Endslope Berm Width I3.00 (ft XI 4.0 I ft =I 12.1 Ift M. Calculate Mound Width: Upslope Berm Width + Bed Width = Downslope Berm Width I11.0 (ft -I 10.0 I ft - I 21.1 I ft =1 42.2 (ft N. Calculate Mound Length: Endslope Berm Width + Bed Length + Endslope Berm Width ( 12.1 1 ft +I 63.0 1 ft +i 12.1 1ft =( 87.1 (ft 7. MOUND DIMENSIONS I /— Upslope (4.0) I 11.0 _ r — i. I ,Endstope 14.LIl Crigkl_1s=� Eie,i. .i r v.. �, IEndslope (4.L1 12.i s 10.0 I b3.01 ' 12.1 c , z • o 21,1 Downslope (4.J) ti r Total. Mound Length (4.N) 1 87.1 J 4" inspection pipe 18' cover on top 21.1 1 Upslope berm (4.0) Downslope berm (4.J) 1 11.0 I it 12" cover on sides '„., (6" topsoil) Clean sar1d lint 14.Ai -77---------„,,,,,, 1.3 1 1 Absorption Width (3.A) Note: 1111 20.0 For 0 to 1% slopes, Absorption Width is measured from the Bedequally in both directions. For slopes .51%, Absorption Width is measured downhill from the upslope edge of the Bed. Comments: I OSTP Mound Materials Worksheet UNIVERSITY Minnesota Pollution Control Agency OF MINNESOTA _\_ , Project ID: +03.19.15 A. Calculate Bed frock)Volume:Bed Length ;LC)X Bed Width 12.8)X Depth = Volume ift'i I63.0 Ift x I 10.0 Ift x :.0 I 630.0 Ift Divide ft'by 27 ft 'yd'to calculate cubic yards: I 630.0 � I tt' a 27 - I 23.3 Iyd. Add 20',for constructability: I 23.3 I yd'X 1.2 - 28.0lyd B. Calculate Clean Sand Volume: 1 Volume Under Rock bed:Average Sand Depth x Media Width x Media Length. =cubic feet I 1.7 Ift X I 10.0 ,ft X I 63.0 jft - ! 1081.5 Ift' (For a Mound on a slope from 0-1% Volume from Length-(lUpslope Mound Height•1)X Absorption Width Beyond Bed x Media Bed Length, I Ift • 11 X I x I Ift = I Volume from Width=iiUpslope Mound Height,1 i X Absorption Width Beyond Bed X Media Bed vridtni I I ft • ii X I I X l Ift I ITotcl Clean Sand Volume: Volume from Length-Volume from Width• Volume Under Media i 1 I I ft' - I I ft - ft = 1 Ift` For a Mound on a slope greater than 1% Upslope Volume: ;;Upslope Mound Height - t)x 3 x Bed Length i-2=cubic feet 1i1 3.4 ft • 1i X 3.0 ft X ! 63.0 2= I 228.4 Ift' Downslope Volume:liDawnslope Height- 1! x Downsiope Absorption Width x Media Length;-2=cubic feet III 4.0 I ft- 11 x I 10.0 Ift x I 63.0 2 = ( 950.3 Ift Endslope Volume:(Downslope Mound Height• 1, x 3 x Media Width =cubic feet 1I 4.0 I ft- 1 i X 3.0 ft X I 10.0 Itt = I 90.5 Ift Total Clean Sand Volume:Upslope Volume •Downslope Volume •Endslope Volume • Volume Under Media I228.4 I ft' - I 950.3 I ft- - I 90.5 I ft - 1081.5 Ift' - 2350.6 If; Divide ft'by 27 ft'.yd to calculate cubic yards: 2350.6 ft i. 27 - I 87.1 Iyd Add 20%for constructability: I 87.1 yd X 1.2 104.5 IYd C. Calculate Sandy Berm Volume: Total Berm Volume rapproxi: ((Avg,Mound Height-0.5 ft topsoil)a Mound Width x Mound Length,-2=cubic feet iI 3.7 I • 0.5 ift X I 42.2 Ift X I 87.1 I 1-2. I 5906.5 Ift' Total Mound Volume-Clean Sand volume-Rock Volume=cubic feet I 5906.5 � I ft' - I 2350.6 I ft - 630.0 J ft 2925.9 I (t Divide ft'by 27 ft''yd''to calculate cubic yards: I 2925.9iC e 27 - 108.4 Iyd; Add 202 for constructability: I 108.4 I ydx �•2 _ ' 130.0 fro' D. Calculate Topsoil Material Volume:Total Mound Width X Total Mound Length X.5 ft I42,2 Ift X I 87.1 Ift X 0.5 ft - 1836.2 jfr Divide ft'by 27 ft yd- to calculate cubic yards: I 1836.2 i ft 27 68.0 yd Add 20'x1-for constructability: II ) 68.0 yd' x 1.2 - 81.6 Iyd 4 Soil Observation Log »....SclricRe>i)urcC.curu Vcr. !Z.! Owner Information m Propert Owner project: Bollis Proe1 ' Date 6�1 1.'U1> Propertm Address PLD: Lot 6 Soil Survey Information I refer to attached soil survey Parent mail's: 4 Till Outwasn Lacustrine _ Alluvium Organic (LL,' Bedrock landscape position: Summit Shoulder '- _,_ Side slope Toe slope soil survey map units: 1:2.2C2slu e ' p 6 "r, direction- Lineal i Soil Log#1 Bonng n! Pit Fie%ation 983 Depth to SHVt'1 18" Depth(in) Texture fragment°0 matrix color redox color consistence grade shape t 1 t7-18 Topsoil ( 35 I0}r3 2 Loose t.00se single gram 18-24 Loam 3; I(i.r43 10)48.1-610y Friable - Strom 1310,;1,. 24-30 Clay Loam . 3-i IO r4 4 1Oy4 8.1-6 IUB Firm strung I'mn,:,ti, 3; loose loose single gram ;j-50 friable weak ranular hlnc,)1 firm ne moderate prismatic plat. rigid strong mu..nc louse 3 5 loose single grain ;j-50 friable weals :_ranular hl�,cl. 50 firm moderate prismatic plat, I rigid strong ma..i%c Comments: Lot 6 Soil Log#2 Bonn 9 -- Pit EleNation 983 Depth to S11 WI 16" Depth tin) Texture fragment°o matrix color redo\color consistence grade shape 0-16 i Topsoil -35 10y r3 2 Loose l_tli)iC single groin 16-2222 Loam 35 10or4 2 I(h4 8.1-6 10s Firm • Strong Mock) 22-30 Cla\ Loam ,.�:3; 10�r4 4 10s 8.1-6 lU_ Firm Strong Prts,nam .-35 35-50 Firm StrOn1 Prl,nlat:, --50 •35 loose loose .ntelc gram 35 -5c) friable weak granular h6,e - firm moderate prismatic plan rigid strong impish,: Lot 6 Soil Log#3 Boring . _I Pit Elevation 983.3 Depth to SHWTI 18" Depth (in) i Texture fragrnent°o matrix color redo\color consistency grade shape 0-I8 Topsoil -..35 10v r3 Loose Loose tingle_taut 18-24 Loam <35 102r4 3 102.4 8.1-6 II). Friable Strong Block} 24-30 Cla.v Loam ..35 i0)r4 4 10,-4 8.1-6 10� Firth Strong Prr,mauc I 3; loose loose ,mgle ram 35 -jQ triable 'teak granular hir,,k�1 50 firm moderate pri,mauc plan rigid strong ma.,i. -,35 loose loose ,inglc=in 35-j{) friable Neak granular bigcl., >jQ tirm moderate prr,mauc plan rigid strong massi‘C I hereby c'r'ib'this work was completed in accordance a ith.tI.V -080 and any local req',. Rusty Olson's Soil & Pere 810 Designer Signature Compan license-,7 Lot 6 _ Soil Log#4 -- Bonng Pit Eletation 983.6 Depth to SH‘t T 20" Depth(in> Texture fragment°" marl color redocolor consistence _rads shape 0-20 Topsoil • 35 10)r_ Loose Loose Single grain 30-36 Loam 35 I0)r-1? 10)-18.1-610) Friable Strong iil,,J;A 1 26-30 C la) Loam 35 liter-t 4 10)-1 8.I-6 ]+)) Finn Strong I'nsnutuc � I lloose•:j; IOOSc single_.rani 3;_iQ friable steal, granular hlrek: >iQ tip moderate pnemutie 111,11 rigid strong nta;,we 3; loose loose single grain 35_10 friable weak granular hlaek� ;p firm moderate prismatic plan\ rigid strong m:u.ne Lot 6 Soil Log#5 J Bonng Pit Elevation 981.5 Depth to SElW T 18" Depth t in) Texture iragment°F. matrix color redox color consistence grade shape 1)-20 Topsoil ;; 10)1.3 Loose Loose Single;rain I I 20-26 Loam 35 10\r-1 : 10)4- 8.1-6 lot Friable Strong l i00,: ;; loose loose single_rain ;;_;Q friable steak granular Klock) ;Q tint moderate prumatie plat) rigid strong massae ;; loose loose single grain 35_ ;Q friable weak Granular h1�,:6� ;- firm moderate prismatic plat rigid strong massite ;; loose loose single cram 35 _50 friable tweak Granular Nock i •i- firm moderate pet;maik pLtn rigid strong ma„nc I herd)), rcyi t-this u mi tins complete(in accordance tt ith IA 'tAit and nn /c}.-ai rey . Rusty Olson's Soil R. Pcrc 810 s sig Sianature Compam License Soil Observation Log 11111'.Sept ICK.xnucc.Cont .ors 12 1 Owner Information 1 Property Ohcner project: Bollis Proert} Date 6`11201> I Property Address PID: Lot 6 Ii i Soil Survey Information _~, refer to attached soil survey Parent mail's: - Till _ Outvaash -- Lacustrine _� Alluvium - Organic _., Bedrock landscape position: Summit Shoulder Side slope � Toe slope soil survey map units: L??(•"? slope 6 "o direction-dovk11hill Soil Log#6 Boring Pit Elevation 982.6 Depth to S1i1k F 20" Depth(in) Texture fragment"0 matrix color redov color consistence grade shape I O-20 Topsoil 10y r3 Loose 1.005t' tiinelv.ram 20-26 Loam • 3; I[h r4 3 I Oy-1 8.1-6 l Qy Friable - - Strop_ 111",:r," 26-30 Clay Loam •-.71: ley r•4 4 I0y4 8.1-6 10y Firm Strong Pri,mar,.. • 35loose loose single dant 35-iU friable weak granular hloeky 50 tirm moderate prr;nuurc n pla rigid strong mass IN r loose loose single_rain :; - 50friable t eak granular Nock:, 50 item ru moderate prnat,c Pk* a rigid strapw masa%e n ments: I Percolation Test Data Sheet Lic.#810 Percolating test readings made by: Rusty Olson's Perc. starting at 10:50 A.M On 6/18/15 Location: Lot 6 Hole number: 1 Date hole was prepared 6117!15 Depth of hole bottom 12" inches. Diameter of hole 6" inches Soil data from test hole: Depth. inches Soil texture 0-12" Dark brown loam 10yr3/2 Method of scratching side wail: Knife Depth of gravel in bottom of hole 2 inches. Date of initial water filling 6/17/15 depth of initial water filling 12 inches above hole bottom. Method used to maintain at least 12 inches of water depth in hole for at least 4 hours Automatic Siphon Maximum water depth above hole bottom during tests 6 inches Time Time Depth Drop in H2O Perc Rate 11:09 11:24 6" 4.0 3.7 11:31 11:46 6'" 3.8 3 9 11:55 12:10 6" 3.7 4 1 AVERAGE PERC. RATE 3.9 MPI Percolation Test Data Sheet Lic.#810 Percolating test readings made by: Rusty Olson's Perc. starting at 10.50 A.M. On 6118115 Location: Lot 6 Hole number: 2 Date hole was prepared 6/17/15 Depth of hole bottom 12" inches. Diameter of hole 6'. inches. Soil data from test hole: Depth. inches Soil texture 0-12" Dark brown loam 10yr3/1 Method of scratching side wall. Knife Depth of gravel in bottom of hole 2 inches: Date of initial water filling 6/17/15 depth of initial water filling 12 inches above hole bottom. Method used to maintain at least 12 inches of water depth in hole for at least 4 hours Automatic Siphon Maximum water depth above hole bottom during tests 6 inches Time Time Depth Drop in H2O Perc Rate 11:10 11:25 6" 3.2 4.7 11:30 11:45 6" 3.1 4.8 11:56 12:11 6" 3.1 4.8 AVERAGE PERC. RATE 4.8 MPI Percolation Test Data Sheet Lic.#810 Percolating test readings made by: Rusty Olson's Perc starting at 10.50 A.M. On 6/18/15 Location: Lot 6 Hole number: 3 Date hole was prepared 6/17/15 Depth of hole bottom,12" inches. Diameter of hole 6' inches. Soil data from test hole. Depth, inches Soil texture 0-12" Dark brown loam 10yr3/2 Method of scratching side wall: Knife Depth of gravel in bottom of hole 2 inches Date of initial water filling 6/17/15 depth of initial water filling 12 inches above hole bottom. Method used to maintain at least 12 inches of water depth in hole for at least 4 hours Automatic Siphon Maximum water depth above hole bottom during tests 6 inches Time Time Depth Drop in H2O Perc Rate 11:11 11:26 6" 3.0 5.0 11:29 11:44 6" 2.9 5.2 '1:57 12:12 6" 2.9 52 AVERAGE PERC. RATE 5 1 MPI Percolation Test Data Sheet Lic.#810 Percolating test readings made by: Rusty Olson's Perc. starting at 10.50 AM On 6/18/15 Location Lot 6 Hole number: 4 Date hole was prepared 6/17/15 Depth of hole bottom__12" inches Diameter of hole 6" inches. Soil data from test hole: Depth, inches Soil texture 0-12" Dark brown loam 10yr3/2 Method of scratching side wall: Knife Depth of gravel in bottom of hole 2 inches. Date of initial water filling 6/17/15 depth of initial water filling 12 inches above hole bottom. Method used to maintain at least 12 inches of water depth in hole for at least 4 hours Automatic Siphon Maximum water depth above hole bottom during tests 6 inches Time Time Depth Drop in H2O Perc Rate 11:12 11:27 6" 31 48 11:28 11:43 6" 3.1 4 8 11:58 12:13 6" 3.1 4.8 AVERAGE PERC. RATE 4 8 MPI Joseph Olson D.B.A. Rusty Olson's--Soil and Percolation Testing Joseph J. Olson--MPCA License #810 11481 Riverview Rd. NE, Hanover, MN 55341 (763) 498-8779 fax (763) 498-8290 NEW FUTURE SITE FOR THE EXISTING HOUSE. Revised April 2,2019 Hollis Property Proposed Lot 2 Orono,Hennepin County This on-site Sewage Treatment System is designed for a future Type 1 five-bedroom home in accordance with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Chapter 7080 and local ordinances. Keep all heavy equipment off the existine and new future septic sites. The seasonally saturated soils were located at 12-22 Inches(mottled soil).Due to the seasonally saturated soils,a pressurized mound system will need to be installed to treat the septic effluent.The bottom of the treatment area must be located at least 3'above the saturated soils. All neighboring wells are greater than 100'from proposed treatment areas. The soils at a depth of 12"have a percolation rate averaging 13 MPI. If the future site is ever used the septic tanks will need to be certified before they could be used. With proper installation and maintenance,this system should have no problem in treating septic effluent effectively.Nothing other than gray water,(laundry, showers,etc.)Human water and toilet tissue should be disposed of into the septic tanks. Iron filters cannot eo into the septic system.Garbage disposals are not recommended.Additives must not be used they may cause harmful damage to your septic system.It is recommended that you pump the septic tanks every two years. Sincerely, Joseph J.Olson t ., rib, 1 SITE.'„E,f�~--�- ,,; \ 4.161, :1:s4)444t0 g ...A. \4. \ ( \ j d > I C r,* / J 4 ' ;9'.„'=-:.'S.,41-1..-.7,.,,,:11, / 1 \ , ....,-- I • ca Sox i \\\>,-../ _ _._ { 1, ----- . , i _ (._../ - - 4,2 ,„.,.. ....,,,-; \ ., i. ....., a - `� n I" t., ii f .. 9ry.6 "r. w 1 I 3snON xa &'b3 3 / ©Jr // al CO 1 Co h.) (C) 0 tewee'-'...._. 1 14,:,.-1,..,,- 1 C e N .....-4",""411 it 70, �a PX‘ r r \ I .f Minnesota Pollution OSTP Design Summary Worksheet UNIVERSITY Control Agency OF Ml\ti ESOTA �.,,�`. Property Owner/Client: Bolus Property 1 Project ID: I v 03.19.15 1 Site Address:1Lot 5{site 8i i Date: 6'231 5 , 1. DESIGN FLOW AND TANKS A. Design now I 750 'Gallons Per Day IGPDi Note: The estimated design flow is considered a peak flow rate including a safety factor. For tong term performance, the average B. Septic Tanks: daily flow is recommended to be 60, of this value. Minimum Code Required Septic Tank Capacity:' 2250 I Gallons.in ; 2 !Tanks or Compartments Recommended Septic Tark Capacity: 2250 Gallons,in 2 'Tanks or Compartments Effluent Screen: no Alarm:; ro 1 C. Holding Tanks Only: Minimum Code Required Capacity: lGaiions,ir, 1Tanks Designer Recommended Capacity: 'Gallons,in l 'Tanks Type of High Level Alarm: D. Pump Tank 1 Capacity(Code Minimum is Gallons Pump Tank 2 Capacity iCode minimum): !Gallons Pump Tank 1 Capacity ibesigner Reci• Gallons Pump Tank 2 Capacity iDesigner Reci: ;Gallons Pump 1 GPM Total Head 'ft Pump 21 GPM Total Head i ft Supply Pipe Dia. lir, Dose Volume: !gal Supply Pipe Dia.' in Dose Volume: gal 2. SYSTEM TYPE 0 Trench !'Bee , i c,,rc A:-maria 2 Gravey astnb.,tccri i ssre Dstr,h.r-�-.iva� ', rWess,.rr:nstnbi,aw•Lnievei Orp 0 Haamg-rack :'tier i 'Selection Required Benchmark Elevation: Sea Level ft Benchmark Location: System Type Type of Distribution Media: ,. _Dra.r`ec Roo _Registe-ed Treatment iteow.. ,,,0 Type I .._Type H Type Iii ` Type IV �.. Type V 1 I I 3. SITE EVALUATION: A. Depth to Limiting Layer: 12 i in 1.0 ft B. Measured Land Slope 13.0 C. Elevation of Limiting Layer: 985.5 D. Soil Texture: Clay Loam I E. Loc.of Restricive Elevation: 1 F. Soil Hyd. Loading Rater 0.45 GPDrft' G. Minimum Required Separation: 36 in 3.0 ft H. Perc Rate:; 13.0 'MPI I. Code Maximum Depth of System: l Mound lir. Comments:j • 4. DESIGN SUMMARY Trench Design Summary Dispersal Area ft' Sidewall Depth! in Trench Width! ft t Total Lineal Feet ft Number of Trenches' Code Maximum Trench Depth in Contour Loading Rate' ft Designers Max Trench Depth! in Bed Design Summary Absorption Area P ft Depth of sidewatl in Code maximum Bed Depth in Bed Width jft Bed Length 'ft Designers Max Bed Depth In OSTP Design Summary Worksheet UNIVERSITY Minnesota Pollution OF 1l ti ESOTA Control Agency Mound Design Summary Absorption Bea Area ( 630.0 ftBed Length 63.0 ft Bed Width 10.0 ft Absorption Width 26,0 ft Clean Sand Lift 2.0 ft Berm Width i0-1`,ii "ft Upslope Berm Width 9.8 [ft Downstope Berm widtn j 25.0 [ft Endslope Berm Width' 15.2 ft Total System Length! 93.3 ft Total System Wdth 44.8 ft Contour Loading Rate 12,0 gat/ft At-Grade Design Summary Absorption Bed Width ft Absorption Bed Length ift System Height I [ft Contour Loading Rate gat,ft Upstope Berm Width Ift Downslope Berm Width! lit Endslope Berm Width! ft System Length eft System Width ft Level&Equal Pressure Distribution Summary No. of Perforated Laterals 3 Perforation Spacing 3 ft Perforation Diameter 7/32 in Lateral Diameter 2 00 in Mm.Delivered Volume 0 gal Maximum Delivered Votume 188 gal Non-Level and Unequal Pressure Distribution Summary Elevation, Pipe Volume Pipe Length {Perforation Size ift) Pipe Size tint (gal'fti lft( I' ani I Spacing tfti Spacing line l Lateral 1 t Minimum Delivered Volume Lateral 2 I gat Lateral 3 1 1I Lateral 4 I Maximum Delivered Volume iteral 5 I gal steral6 J I i t 5. Additional Info for Type IV/Pretreatment Design A. Calculate the organic loading 1. Organic Loading to Pretreatment Unit =Design Flow X Estimated BOO in mg L in the effluent X 8.35 1.000.000 pc) X ma'L X 8,35,i, .000 1 los 80D'day 2. Type of Pretreatment Unit Being Installed: 3. Calculate Solt Treatment System Organic Loading: BOO concentration after pretreatment i.Bottom Area =lbs%day,ft` mg/L X 8.35:1.000,000 : ft' = [lbs.day ft' ( Comments/Special Design Considerations: I I hereby certify that I have completed this work in.accrdance witn all applicable ordinances,rules and laws. Joseph J Olson` _-- _...__ 810 06123/15 IDesigneri (Signature) 'License-, (Date' OSTP Mound Design UNIVERSITY Minnesota Pollution Worksheet > I % Slope OF MINNESOTA Control Agency 1. SYSTEM SIZING: Project ID: v 03.19.15 A. Design Flow: 750 GPD :TABLE IXa B. Soil Loading Rate: 0.45 GPO/ft` LOADING RATES POR DETERMINING BOTTOM ABSORPTION AREA AND ABSORPTION RATIOS USING PERCOLATION TESTS Treatment Level C Treatment Level A,A-2,5,� C. Depth to Limiting Condition: 1.0 ft Percolation Rate Absorption Absorption Area Loading wound Area Loathn! Mound D. Percent Land Slope: 13,0 % ( ) Rate Absorption Rate Absorpbon (1Pd/ft') Ratio Ratio Ratio E. Design Media Loading Rate: 1.2 GPD/ft` , F. Mound Absorption Ratio: 2.60 1.2 1 1.8 1 ........... 1 06 2 1 16 Tablet , : :3 >, . 1 MOUND CONTOUR LOADING RATES. 0.78 1 6 1 1 6 Contoui 0.6 2 0.78 2 rloastir od TAeturo ,dot ivrtd t :_ .1,01:-.Rate OP mound absorption qtly LOadErktj 0.5 2.4 0.78 2 Rat*: 0.45 2.6 0,6 2.5 €01,1',., 1,G. 1 3 ..,) ..4 i h ..1. b 0.3 5.3 aaaaaaa�ra� 1 _ - - 61.12i; *IPI lFR a r, 'Systems with these values are not Type I systems. lacy r„ , s,Y. • F. Contour Loading Rate (linear loading rate) is a recommended value. 2. DISPERSAL MEDIA SIZING A. Calculate Dispersal Bed Area: Design Flow: Design Media Loading Rate = ft' 750 GPD + 1.2 GPD/ft2 = 625 ft' If a larger dispersal media area is desired, enter size: 630 ft' B. Enter Dispersal Bed Width: 10.0 ft Can not exceed 10 feet C. Calculate Contour Loading Rate: Bed Width X Design Media Loading Rate 10 ft` X 1.2 GPD/ft` = 12.0 gal/ft Can not exceed Table I D. Calculate Minimum Dispersal Bed Length: Dispersal Bed Area : Bed Width =Bed Length 630 ft2 = 10.0 ft = 63.0 ft 3. ABSORPTION AREA SIZING A. Calculate Absorption Width: Bed Width X Mound Absorption Ratio =Absorption Width 10.0 ft X 2.6 = 26.0 ft B. For slopes>1%, the Absorption Width is measured downhill from the upslope edge of the Bed. Calculate Downslope Absorption Width: Absorption Width - Bed Width 26.0 ft • 10.0 ft = 16.0 ft 4. DISTRIBUTION MEDIA: ROCK A. Media Volume: Media Depth below and above pipe X Length X Width 0.75 ft X 63.0 ft X 1 10.0 ft = 473 ft' = 27 = 18 yd-' 5. DISTRIBUTION MEDIA: REGISTERED TREATMENT PRODUCTS: CHAMBERS AND EZFLOW A. Enter Dispersal Media: B. Enter the Component: Length: I ft Width:I ft Depth: !ft C. Number of Components per Row= Bed Length divided by Component Length (Rouno up) ft _ ft = components/row D. Actual Bed Length = Number of Components/row X Component Length: It components X 1 ft = ft E. Number of Rows =Bed Width divided by Component Width (Round up) 1 ft; ft = rows Adjust width so this is on whole number. F. Total Number of Components=Number of Components per Row X Number of Rows IX = components 6. MOUND SIZING A. Calculate Minimum Clean Sand Lift:3 feet minus Depth to Limiting Condition = Clean Sand Lift 3.0 ft • 1.0 ft = 2.0 ft Design Sand Lift (optional): ft B. Calculate Upstope Height: Clean Sand Lift > media depth *cover(1 ft.) = Upslope Height 2.0 ft - 0.8 ft -t 1.0 ft= 3.8 ft C. Select Upslope Berm Multiplier(based on land slope): 2.62 Land Slope% 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Upslope Berm 3:1 3.00 2.91 2 83 2.75 2.68 2.61 2.54 2.48 2.42 2.36 2.31 2.26 2,21 1 Ratio 4;1 4.00 3.85 3.70 3.57 3.45 3.33 3.23 3.12y 3.03 2.94 2.86 2.78 2.70 D. Calculate Upslope Berm Width: Multiplier X Upslope Mound Height =Upslope Berm Width 2.62 )ft X 3.8 ft = 9.8 ft E. Calculate Drop in Elevation Under Bed: Bed Width X Land Slope = 100= Drop(ft) 10.0 ft X 13.0 % : 100= 1.30 ft F. Calculate Downslope Mound Height: Upslope Height Drop in Elevation = Downslope Height 3.8 ft - 1.30 ft = 5.1 ft G. Select Downslope Berm Multiplier (based on land slope): 4.95 Land Slope% 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Downslope 3:1 3.00 3.09 3.19 3.30 3.41 3.53 3,66 3.80 3.95 4.11 4.29 4.48 4.69 Berm Ratio 4:1 4.00. 4.17 4.35 4.54 4.76 5.00 5.26 5.56 5.88 6.25 6.67 7.14 7.694 H. Calculate Downslope Berm Width: Multiplier X Downslope Height =Downslope Berm Width 4.95 x 1 5.1 I ft = 25.0 ft I. Calculate Minimum Berm to Cover Absorption Area: Downslope Absorption Width - 4 feet 16.0 I ft 4 ft = 20.0 ft J. Design Downslope Berm = greater of 4H and 41: 25.0 ft K. Select Endslope Berm Multiplier: 3.00 (usually 3.0 or 4.0) L. Calculate Endslope Berm X Downslope Mound Height = Endslope Berm Width 3.00 ft X 5.1 ft =I 15.2 1ft M. Calculate Mound Width: Upslope Berm Width - Bed Width Downslope Berm Width 9.8 I ft - 10.0 ft * 25.0 ft = 44.8 ft N. Calculate Mound Length: Endslope Berm Width - Bed Length Endslope Berm Width I15.2 ft - 63.0 ft - 15.2 ft =1 93,3 Ift 7. MOUND DIMENSIONS (----- Upstope 14.01 9.8 Endslape 14.L11 ' r IEndsto•e 14.L) i v 15.2 10.0 63.0 `" 15.2; c 250 76. . Downslope (4.J) Total Mound Length (4.N) 93.3 4" inspection pipe 18" cover on top 25.0 Upstope berm (4.D) r Downslope berm (4.J) 9.8 -----,- • \.Olt . 12" cover on sides (6" topsoil) Clear sans lift )4.,41 2.0 �.-,. 1.o 1 IAbsorption Width (3.A) 1 Note: ' 26.0 For 0 to 1% stapes, Absorption Width is measured from the Bedequally in both directions. For slopes >1%, Absorption Width is measured downhill from the upslope edge of the Bed. Comments: OSTP Mound Materials Worksheet UNIVERSITY Minnesota Pollution OF MINNESOTA Control Agency '�=� Project ID: v 03,19.15 A. Calculate Bed frock)Volume:Bed Length (2.C1 X Bed Width 12.81 X Depth =Volume lft"i 63.0 ft X 1 10.0 lit X '.0 630.0 ft Divide ft-by 27 ft- yd-to calculate cubic yards: I630.0 ft s 27 - 23.3 yd Aad 20' j yd X 1.2 for constructability: 23.3 = Iyd 28,0 B. Calculate Clean Sand Volume: Volume Under Rock bed:Average Sand Depth x Media Width x Media Length =cuoic feet 2.4 ft x I 10.0 ft X i 63,0 Itt I 1512.0 Ift For a Mound on a slope from 0-1% Volume from Length=ItUpslope mound Height- 11 X Absorption Width Beyond Bed X Media Bed Length) I ft -1; X x ift = Volume from Width°ItUpslope Mound Height- 1 r X Absorption Width Beyond Bed X Media Bea Width' ft • t i X f , ft - I Total Clean Sand Volume:Volume from Length-Volume from Width- Volume Under Media ft - 1 i ft - ' ft • eft i For a Mound on a slope greater than 1% Upslope Volume:flUpslope Mound Height - 1 i a 3 x Bed Length i-2•cubic feet I ti 3.8 ft - 1, Y 3.0 ft X I 63.0 ;-2 - 259.9 ft I Downslope Volume:t iDownslope Height. 1, x Downslope Absorption Width x Media Length)-2-cubic feet it 5.1 ft•f) x 16.0ft x 63.0I -2 -- 1 2041.2 ft Endslope Volume: (Downslope Mound Height. t r x 3 a Media Width -cubic feet I 5.1 ft-1 , '< 3.0 ft X I 10.0 Ift = 121.5 In Total Clean Sand Volume: Upslope Volume -Downslope Voiume -Endsiope Volume - Volume Under Media i 259.9 ft' • 2041,2 ! ft . 121.5 ft - ' 1512,0 Itt 3933.6 ft Divide ft'by 27 tt-yd to calculate cubic yards: i 3934.6 ft : 27l 145.7 i yd Add 20%for constructability: 145.7 yd' x 1.2 - 174.9 yd. C. Calculate Sandy Berm Volume: Total Berm Volume(approxr:tlAvg.Mound Height-0.5 ft topsoil)x Mound Width x mound Length'-2 =cubic feet 1 4.4 - 0.5 'ft X 44.8 eft X I 93.3 ,-2= 8154.8 ft , Total Mound Volume-Clean Sand volume-Rock Volume=cubic feet 8154.8 ft` - 3934.6 ft- - 630.0 I ft' _ 3590.2 Ifc Divide ft'by 27 ft`=yd-to calculate cubic yards: I 3590.2 ft ÷ 27 133.0 yd Add 20%for constructability: 133.0 yd x 1.2 - 159.6 Iyd • D. Calculate Topsail Material Voiume:Total Mound Width X Total Mound Length X.5 ft 44.8 ift X I 93.3 Ift it 0.5 ft I 2091.0 Ift Divide ft by 27 ft-,yd to calculate cubic yards: 2091.0 ft - 27 - 77,4 yd Add 20%--for constructability: f 77,4 yd x 1.2 92.9 yd. Soil Observation Log N\%N.Sepii l2,001.1rie.00111\er, 12.4 Owner Information Proper. Owner project; Bollis Proertn Date 6 6 201 j Property Address PID: Lot 5 Soil Survey Information , i refer to attached soil survey Parent matt',. i f Till Outwash Lacustrine Alluvium Organic I , Bedrock landscape position: SummitShoulder Side slope Toe slope soil sure} map units: L22C2 slope 13 °o direction- Linear Soil Log#1 Boring V Pit Elevation 990.' Depth to SH\A 1 18" Depth(in) Texture fragment"ii matrix color redo\color consistence grade shape I I 0-6 Topsoil <-35 IO,r4 2 Loose Loose ti.i vie::ra,n 6-12 Loam 35 I0 r5 4 Friable Strong Itl.,as 1'-18 C Ia) Loam 35 l0>r5 4 Firm Strom, Iii,al. I8-24 1 Clai Loani 35 Ithr5 4 10)4 8.1-6 10) Firm Strong Pri,nlui loose loose 35 single_ram friable Neale granularMock, 35- 50 firm moderate prIsmaI plas>50h rigid strong inasne Comments: Lot 5 Soil Log#2 Boring Pik EleNatiun 990.4 Depth to SHWT 16" Depth(in) Texture fragment°a matrix color redox color consistence grade shape 0-8 Topsoil "35 10>r32 Loose Loose Sm_!c grain 8-16 Loam „35 IO>r4 3 Friable Strong luo,:k, 16-22 Clav Loam .35 10>r5 4 Final Strong t3iod,� 22-28 Cla> Loam • 35 I0srS 4 I0>4 8.1-6 10> Firm Stron:1 Pr.m:uic I Lot 5 Soil Log#3 7 Boring H Pit Elexarion 986.5 Depth to SUNT 16" Depth(in) Texture fragment"° matrix color redox color consistence grade shape 0-8 Topsoil -r 35 10>r4 2 Loose Loose single grain 8-16 Cla> Loam • 35 10>r5 4 Firm Strong filo,•k'. 16-24 Cia> Loam • 35 10>rs 4 10x4 8.1-6 10> Firm Strong Prismatic �� loose loose mrk gain ;; - 50 friable vreal granular Nock� 50 firm nloderate pri.'nturc plat) rigid stron�1. ti1:Ui11C loose loose` ,Ingle grain friable 35-5Q ‘1eak ran Ulu block AO firm moderate Pr Isamu, ptit rigid strong 111:1,1% I hereby certili'Mk work was completed in acc ordctftcc is nit.111""On and any lo,a1,•c t1%, 1 n , Rusin Olson's Soil & Perc. 810 Designer Signature Compan> License n. Lot 5 Soil Log#4 Boring _ Pit Eleaatian 983.9 Depth to SHWT L' Depth(in) Texture fragment 00 matrix color redox color consistence grade shape 0-6 Topsoil -35 10r4 2 Loose Loose *alto,:grain 6-I 2 Cla> Loam _; 10>r5-I 1-irm Strong tn,hko 1 12-18 Clad Loam 5 1Or5 4 10 -1 8.1-6 10y Firm Strong Pri;m:a;, 1 loose loose 3.5 .u, lc er ,; 35-50 triable weak granular hi:wk� =- firm moderate priamal plat) rigid strum mass i,r . 35loose loose single grain friable weak granular Mocks 3?-?ll 50 firm moderate print oat rigid strong ma..i,e I sot > _ Soil Log#5 Boring Pit EleNation 990.2 Depth to SHV T 18" Depth(in) Texture fragment 00 matrix color redox color consistence grade shape i 6-6 kipsoil 35 10.x r3 2 I Loose Loos4sin*_rain 1 1 6-18 Loam 35 l0rr-t 3 Friable Strong tnoek, I 8-1-1 Cla. Loam ;; I(l,r5 4 I(I'4 8.1-6 10Firm Strong 1360.k -35loose loose single grain 35 4O friable weak ranular blu:k� �O I tine moderate pmniapr plat. rigid Strong n,u;.o.;: -. -3 j loose loose single grain friable weak granular hluek% SO firm moderate Prismatic Iraq rigid strong ma.;ne I hereby cerlifI &- this work was completed in LcoreL,OL- with.tI\ tiSti anal eny local reg'...'r Rusty Olson's Soil & Pere. 810 ,Designer Signature Compan License-: Soil Observation Log u��‘1.SepticRc>uurcc,crr1n ter. )2.4 Owner Information Property O'mner project: Hollis Proert> Date 6'6.2015 Propert> Address PID: Lot 5 Soil Survey Information refer to attached soil survey Parent marl's: E Till - Ourwash 17. Lacustnne 7 Alluvium — Organic Bedrock landscape position: r Summit Shoulder Side s ape Toe slope soil surge} map units: L2?C_' slope 13 direction- Linear Soil Log#6 Borng Pit Elevation 990.2 Depth to SI RN T 18" Depth(in) Texture fragment°n matrix color redox color consisterne ,rade shape I 0-6 Topsoil . 35 IUtr3 2 Loose Loose tiinglc grain 6-18 Clay Loam i 35 103 r4 3 Friable Strom )3l0.lc 18-24 Cla> Loam ,35 10 rS 4 I0 4 8.1-6 I(h Firm Strong r' . r� man: loose loose 5 ,melt:ram 35..> friable ueah granular hloak. 450 firm moderate pri,matk pial} riuuili strong nta+;ire i j loose loose mglc_r;1111 ;j ->{) friable It gal: ranular blvd, 50 firm moderate pri,mitlia plan rigid strum! manna omments: I Percolation Test Data Sheet Lic.#810 Percolating test readings made by: Rusty Olson's Perc. starting at 10.20 A.M. On 6/17/15 Location: Lot 5 Hole number. 1 Date hole was prepared 6/16/15 Depth of hole bottom_12" inches. Diameter of hole_6"_inches. Soil data from test hole: Depth. inches Soil texture 0-6" Dark Brown Loam 10yr412 6"-12" Brown Loam 10yr5/4 Method of scratching side wall: Knife Depth of gravel in bottom of hole 2 inches: Date of initial water filling 6/16/15 depth of initial water filling 12 inches above the hole bottom Method used to maintain at least 12 inches of water depth in hole for at least 4 hours Automatic Siphon Maximum water depth above hole bottom during tests 6 inches Time Time Depth Drop in H2O Perc Rate 10:45 11:15 6" 3.5 8.6 11:34 12:04 6" 3.3 9.1 12:05 12:35 6" 3.3 9.1 AVERAGE PERC. RATE 8.9 MPI Percolation Test Data Sheet Lic.#810 Percolating test readings made by. Rusty Olson's Perc. starting at 10:20 A.M On 6117/15 Location: Lot 5 Hole number: 2 Date hole was prepared: 6/16/15 Depth of hole bottom_12"_inches. Diameter of hole._,6" inches. Soil data from test hole: Depth. inches Soil texture 0-8" Dark Brown Loam 10yr3/2 8"-12" Brown Loam 10yr4/3 Method of scratching side wall. Knife Depth of gravel in bottom of hole 2 inches: Date of initial water filling 6/16/15 depth of initial water filling 12 inches above the hole bottom Method used to maintain at least 12 inches of water depth in hole for at least 4 hours Automatic Siphon Maximum water depth above hole bottom during tests 6 inches Time Time Depth Drop in H2O Perc Rate 10:46 11:16 6" 2.1 14 3 11:33 12:03 6" 2.0 15.0 12:06 12:36 6" 2.0 15 0 AVERAGE PERC. RATE 14 7 MPI Percolation Test Data Sheet Lic.#810 Percolating test readings made by: Rusty Olson's Perc. starting at 1020 A.M. On 6/17/15 Location: Lot 5 Hole number: 3 Date hole was prepared: 6/16/15 Depth of hole bottom 12' inches. Diameter of hole 6" inches Soil data from test hole: Depth, inches Soil texture 0-8" Dark Brown Loam 10yr412 8"-12" Brown clay Loam 10yr5/4 Method of scratching side wall. Knife Depth of gravel in bottom of hole 2 inches: Date of initial water filling 6/16/15 depth of initial water filling 12 inches above the hole bottom Method used to maintain at least 12 inches of water depth in hole for at least 4 hours Automatic Siphon Maximum water depth above hole bottom during tests 6 inches I Time Time Depth Drop in H2O Pere Rate J 10:47 11:17 6" 2.2 13.6 11:32 12:02 6" 2 1 14.3 12:07 12:37 6" 2.1 14 3 AVERAGE PERC. RATE 14.1 MPI Percolation Test Data Sheet Lic.#810 Percolating test readings made by: Rusty Olson's Perc. starting at 10 20 A.M On 6/17/15 Location: Lot 5 Hole number: 4 Date hole was prepared: 6/16/15 Depth of hole bottom 12" inches. Diameter of hole 6"_inches. Soil data from test hole' Depth. inches Soil texture 0-6" Dark Brown Loam 10yr4/2 6"-12" Brown clay Loam 10yr5/4 Method of scratching side wall: Knife Depth of gravel in bottom of hole 2 inches Date of initial water filling 6/16/15 depth of initial water filling 12 inches above the hole bottom Method used to maintain at least 12 inches of water depth in hole for at least 4 hours Automatic Siphon Maximum water depth above hole bottom during tests 6 inches I Time Time Depth Drop in H2O Perc Rate 10:48 11:18 6" 2,6 115 11:31 12:01 6" 2.6 11 5 12:08 12:38 6" 2.5 12.0 AVERAGE PERC, RATE 11.6 MPI Tree Preservation Plan There shall be a Tree preservation plan to include all areas within 10 ft of boundary lines. Proposed private drive is designed to preserve the existing trees that line the driveway entrance today. Hennepin Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Date: 3/5/2019 iii x, 4eAtt Rd iii;.-u 4c • __ ,. — m1_ r I Liii, .. , , . , ?« a _ , r 4r,..i .H'IV'rtrir0044,41$1141L,r4f42,04krZ 41;1;=11ki 4If / ce$1 4VF.: R F Sm I E i Buffer Size: 500 0 100200 400 Feet Map Comments: I I I I I I I I I 350 Stubbs Bay Rd N This data (i) is furnshed 'AS IS with no representation as to completeness or accuracy;(I)is furnished with nowarranty of any kind; and (ii) is notsuitable for legal,engineering or surveying purposes.Hennepin County shal not be liable for any damag e,injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information,contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South,Minneapolis,MN 5 5487/g is.info@hennepi n.us RUN DATE:03/01/2019 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:1 38 32-118-23 13 0003 38 32-118-23 42 0005 ANNE MAHDAL BARAN TRUST J BURCKHARDT&A BURCKHARDT 480 STUBBS BAY RD N 300 STUBBS BAY RD N ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ANNE MAHDAL BARAN JONAH BURCKHARDT 480 STUBBS BAY RD ABBY BURCHHARDT LONG LAKE MN 55356 1000 SUPERIOR BLVD STE 200 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 32-118-23 13 0005 38 32-118-23 42 0006 H STROBEL&J T HOFFMAN C W BOLLIS&R A BOLLIS 430 STUBBS BAY RD N 350 STUBBS BAY RD N ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 JOSHUA T HOFFMAN CHRISTOPHER W BOLLIS 430 STUBBS BAY RD N RACHEL A BOLLIS LONG LAKE MN 55356 350 STUBBS BAY RD N LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 32-118-23 13 0006 38 32-118-23 42 0007 LEE OLMSCHEID CHRISTOPHER W BOLLIS ET AL 440 STUBBS BAY RD N 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 00000 LEE OLMSCHEID CHRISTOPHER W BOLLIS 440 STUBBS BAY RD N RACHEL A BOLLIS LONG LAKE MN 55356 350 STUBBS BAY RD N LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 32-118-23 13 0007 38 32-118-23 42 0008 STUBBS ADDN HOMEOWNERS ASCN C J&G M BOLLIS 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 38 ADDRESS PENDING ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 00000 STUBBS HOMEOWNERS ASCN CHRISTOPHER J BOLLIS C/O CUSTOM STRUCTURES LTD GAIL M BOLLIS 15500 WAYZATA BLVD 220 STUBBS BAY RD N WAYZATA MN 55391 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 32-118-23 21 0006 38 32-118-23 42 0009 BURLINGTON NORTHERN RY C J&G M BOLLIS 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 38 ADDRESS PENDING ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 00000 B N&SANTA FE RR CO CHRISTOPHER J BOLLIS PROPERTY TAX DEPT GAIL M BOLLIS PO BOX 961089 220 STUBBS BAY RD N FORT WORTH TX 76161 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 32-118-23 31 0001 BRIDGET CESSOR-CULVER 385 STUBBS BAY RD N ORONO MN 55356 BRIDGET CESSOR-CULVER 385 STUBBS BAY RD N LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 32-118-23 310003 K R KRIEGER&J L KRIEGER 355 STUBBS BAY RD N ORONO MN 55356 FREDRICK R KRIEGER 355 STUBBS BAY RD N LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 32-118-23 31 0005 REVIS L STEPHENSON III 3760 WATERTOWN RD ORONO MN 55359 REVIS L STEPHENSON III 1850 FOXRIDGE RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 32-118-23 41 0002 TAJ MELSON&B PACE GRACZYK 3330 WATERTOWN RD ORONO MN 55356 TAJ MELSON BILLIE PACE GRACZYK 3330 WATERTOWN RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 32-118-23 42 0001 RICHARD N STUBBS TRUSTEE 400 STUBBS BAY RD N ORONO MN 55356 RICHARD N STUBBS 400 STUBBS BAY RD N LONG LAKE MN 55356 Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases.Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available.The viewer should understand,however,that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties,either express or implied,or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. Date Application Received: 03/06/19 �O1 VO Date Application Considered as Complete:03/15/19 60-Day Review Period Expires: 05/14/19 y � To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members < o� Dustin Rief, City Administrator �krSi-I From: Melanie Curtis, Planner WOG Date: 15 April 2019 Subject: #LA19-000019, Chris Lake o/b/o Brackett Point Property, LLC, 1400 Bracketts Point Road, CUP—Guest House& IUP—Export 500+cubic yards of material Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting approval of an IUP to support the export of over 500 cubic yards of material from the site and soil disturbance in excess of 50 cubic yards within the 75-foot setback in conjunction with construction of a new residence; and a CUP for a guest house use. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval with conditions. Background The applicant is requesting approval of an interim use permit (IUP)to allow the export of approximately 9,500 cubic yards of material; and disturbance of approximately 5,800 cubic yards of material within the 75-foot setback to facilitate the construction of a new residence on the property. Additionally,they seek approval of a guest house conditional use permit(CUP)to allow a new guest house use. Section 78-305 -Lot Area/Width: LR-1A Lot Area Lot Width Required 87,120 s.f. (2.0 acres) 200' Actual 230,852 s.f. (5.3 acres) +600' Applicable Regulations: Guest House CUP (Section 78-305) The applicant is requesting a CUP to permit a guest house use on the property.At 5.3 acres,the property meets the requirement for twice the LR-1A minimum lot area to support a secondary dwelling use/guest house.The proposed guest house will have a 2,182 square foot footprint where a single 2,200 square foot oversized accessory building (OAB) is allowed, based on the property's size. Interim Use Permit (Code Section 78-1726(a)(6)) The construction of a new residence on the property will result in 9,500 cubic yards of unneeded material. The applicant proposes to export this material from the site;they have indicated that FILE#LA19-000019 15 April 2019 Page 2 of 5 the destination site will not be within the City. Additionally proposed grading work and storm sewer pipe installation will disturb approximately 5,800 cubic yards of material within the 75- foot lake setback area. Neither the 75-foot zone grading nor the export of materials will result in the proposed home being out of character with the neighborhood. Applicable Regulation: Conditional Use Permit(Section 78-916) The Planning Commission may recommend and the Council may grant a Conditional Use Permit(CUP) as the use permit was applied for or in modified form. On the basis of the application and the evidence submitted,the city must find that the proposed use at the proposed location is or will be: 1) Consistent with the community management plan;the proposed guest house use is residential in nature and the residential use is consistent with the CMP guiding for this neighborhood. 2) Compliant with the zoning code, including any conditions imposed on specific uses as required by article V, division 3 of the City Code; The guest house is in a conforming location and the lot size is compliant with the zoning ordinance. 3) Adequately served by police,fire, roads, and stormwater management;the proposed guest house will be adequately served by existing services and facilities. 4) Provided with an adequate water supply and sewage disposal system; Staff believes this criterion is met. 5) Not expected to generate excessive demand for public services at public cost; Staff believes this criterion is met. 6) Compatible with the surrounding area as the area is used both presently and as it is planned to be used in the future;the proposed guest house is residential in character and its use is expected to be compatible with the surrounding area. 7) Consistent with the character of the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan;the guest house is residential in visual character and is expected to be compatible with the surrounding area. 8) Compatible with the character of buildings and site improvements in the surrounding area, unless a change of character is called for in the community management plan; The architectural styling of the proposed guest house is expected to be residential in character and consistent with that of the principal building on the Property. 9) Not expected to substantially impair the use and enjoyment of the property in the area or have a materially adverse impact on the property values in the area when compared to the impairment or impact of generally permitted uses; The use of the guest house is not expected to have any adverse impacts; no information has been presented to indicate such. 10) Provided with screening and buffering adequate to mitigate undesirable views and activities likely to disturb surrounding uses;the guest house will be situated within the property and will not be significantly visible when viewed from off the Property on the street side, and the views from the lake will be minimal. In the opinion of staff,additional screening or buffering will not be required. 11) Not create a nuisance which generates smoke, noise,glare,vibration, odors,fumes, dust, electrical interference,general unsightliness, or other means;the proposed guest house is not expected to cause any of these undesirable impacts. 12) Not cause excessive non-residential traffic on residential streets, parking needs that cause a demonstrable inconvenience to adjoining properties,traffic congestion,or FILE#LA19-000019 15 April 2019 Page 3 of 5 unsafe access; it is anticipated that the proposed guest house will not generate any of these undesirable issues. 13) Designed to take into account the natural, scenic, and historic features of the area and to minimize environmental impact;the proposed guest house has been designed to conform to the architecture of the proposed residence on the property, and will not have a negative environmental impact. 14) All exterior lighting shall be so directed so as not to cast glare toward or onto the public right-of-way or neighboring residential uses or districts; Applicants are hereby advised of this requirement; and 15) Not detrimental to the public health, public safety, or general welfare. Staff believes this criterion is met. A CUP may be granted subject to such conditions as the Council may prescribe. Additionally, a CUP shall remain in effect as long as the conditions imposed by the City Council are observed, but nothing in this section shall prevent the city from enacting or amending official controls to change the status of conditional uses. Applicable Regulation: Interim Use Permit(Section 78-1726) The Planning Commission may recommend and the Council may grant an Interim Use Permit (IUP). On the basis of the application and the evidence submitted,the city council determines that the use will comply with the following: 1) The use will meet the general performance standards in section 78-916 of this chapter; the proposed grading will conform to the standards within Section 78-916 of the Zoning Code. 2) The use is allowed as an interim use in the applicable zoning district;grading and export of materials are permitted within the LR-1A zoning district;this statement is true. 3) The use will not delay anticipated development or redevelopment of the site;the proposed grading activity will be conducted in conjunction with the development of the new single family home on the property.This statement is true. 4) The use will not be in conflict with any provisions of the city code on an ongoing basis; the proposed grading activity will not be in conflict with the Code. 5) The use will not adversely affect the adjacent property,the surrounding neighborhood, or other uses on the property where the use will be located;this standard requires that the proposed grading and improvements must not substantially impair the use and enjoyment of the properties in the area when compared to the impairment or impact of generally permitted uses. The result of the proposed grading will not change the intended residential use of the Property so there should be no change in the use and enjoyment of adjacent properties resulting from the export of fill materials. However, activity of exporting approximately 9,500 cubic yards of fill and active grading of the Property during construction can have a temporary adverse impact on neighbors. The grading work on the Property as well as the forthcoming construction of the proposed home could result in additional noise, dust,vibration and traffic on the haul routes and immediate neighbors. To the degree possible, negative impacts should be limited and mitigated. 6) The use will not impose additional unreasonable costs on the public;the builder and owner will be responsible for keeping debris off of the roadways.The noise resulting from the trucks hauling and equipment moving the material in and around the site FILE#LA19-000019 15 April 2019 Page 4 of 5 should be minimized to the extent possible. The grading and construction project will be monitored by the City Engineer and planning staff so as to minimize nuisances during the project. 7) The date or event that will terminate the use can be identified with certainty;the conclusion of the grading activity will coincide with the finalization of the construction of the proposed home on the property.An as-built survey shall be submitted to confirm conformance with the approved grading plan at the closing of the permits. 8) And the applicant agrees in writing to any conditions that the city council deems appropriate for the use, including a requirement for a financial security to ensure removal of all evidence of the use upon termination,and restoration of the site to prior or better conditions.The conditions shall be set forth in a development agreement between the property owner and the city, which agreement shall be recorded with the Hennepin County Recorder or Registrar of Deeds.The conditions of approval will be documented as required. Interim Use Permit Analysis Staff finds the proposed plan conforms to the standards of IUP review,the grading activity will be tied to the building permit for the new residence. Engineer Comments The City Engineer has reviewed the plans for the IUP and will subsequently review and provide direction regarding the building permit plan set.The haul route appears acceptable, however the applicant should clarify the ultimate destination for the exported materials. The hauling of material off site shall not commence until Spring load restrictions are lifted. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the approvals, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested IUP and CUP? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning staff recommends approval of the guest house CUP with the standard covenants; and approval of the IUP for the grading activity in accordance with the City Engineer's and all other applicable jurisdictional requirements. The property owners shall agree to the filing of a covenant in the title of the property providing that the guest house accessory building shall be for the sole use of the occupants of the principle dwelling, including their domestic employees and nonpaying guests and will not be: 1. Used for a home occupation unless specifically approved by the city or if allowed by this Code. 2. Rented or leased under any circumstances. FILE#LA19-000019 15 April 2019 Page 5 of 5 List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Proposed Site Plan & Grading and Drainage Plan Exhibit C. Proposed Guest House Plans and Elevations Exhibit D. City Engineer Memo Exhibit E. Property Owners List Exhibit F. Plat Map Land Use Application Summary Application Date: 03/06/2019 Address: 1400 BRACKETTS POINT RD WAYZATA, MN 55391 Parcel Number: 1111723320020 Land Use Number: LA 19-000019 Application Submitted By: Agent on behalf of property owner Owner: Name: Brackett Point Property, LLC Address: c/o Chris Lake,Attorney/Member 20840 P Prairie Hills Ln Prior Lake, MN 55372 Applicant: Name: Chris Lake Company: Brackett Point Property, LLC Address: chris@levellawfirm.com Contact Information: Associated Contact: Chris Lake chris@levellawfirm.com Associated Contact: Richard Henriksen rhenriksen@sharrattdesign.com Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Project Description: IUP-Material export& CUP- Guest house Land Use Application Type: Amendmend Application 1 Appeal of Admin Decision L J Concept Application H.- Conditional Use Permit i✓i Site Plan Application L- Subdivision Application C Subdivision Exception ---1 Vacation Application Li Variance Application L. Applicant Signature: Interim Use Permit information. • Haul Routes with Map. From County Rd. 19 at Navarre,east on County Rd. 15 to Bracketts Pt. Rd. See attached map. (NO GOING WEST ON 15 FROM 394 AS THERE ISA RESTRICTED BRIDGE ON 15 EAST OF BRACKETTS PT.RD. • Earthwork Calculations Total disturbance on site(18,000 CV+/-);0-75'zone disturbance(0 CYJ;all import(0 CYJ;and all export(9,500CYJ. • Hauling Times. (7:00am—8:OOpm weekdays and 8:00am—8:00pm weekends per City of Orono) • Excavation Contractor or Builder Contact information 24 hour availability. J.S.Stewart Companies;Jim Stewart(612)-366-6891 or John Kraemer and Sons; Luke Jarchow(612)-910-1353 w�x' a �p 27 min g �y A >ai ,_. 2525min 4 , , i p e $ Noes nberg' tc a v k �bumy Park t ti ��s� gas i�� 7 y ® .."y 4sr L "` .. BreckeKsn S ear w sj o- ?.�£. ,, s.'-$.s CRYSTAL , »§.�. PWM:, »*�3 F 0 },,� wa say A a 3is3� �Thr r '`< p•.., r.. ,a NSwrea +- - 5i$ } d s �' rs i 'f��. �fir' > rifi ❑ ; x�} ' 7 min 8 ¢; c s a 5 milesz F.i `S`,: z: - $ -sx 5.....p r =' Navarre• >k � ° ,, �. i�z'" 4 �. c4441/g*AgSil, .. . } F Big ISimld 'ri` �.. } le t_V`'t c u' ? `'s*1; &g Island 'iil fei•?e 'z,,, _r ,"'r 'e sE3 7 ii I .,�" Regional §f a ,.,'tf"" „' z "t. _{7,10,031,.,,f.':2' r :.. ¥' c', y aii,� i u t;. Park /Men i { °�, 3 a i - 's •. i s F ,; f11,-„,-- om,» , WddlrfQ t 4 F��' z„k' .,'"�` 4,-"'"'"'"'.'"'''." s ' `s;� v3. rk 't s '� y4r t t l>'� x' `„ap g,� fs ,s, .t”. " T� x q Crr`I£ x , =., 'a was °'�Sra4<�"sy�la�"�� i ja ' ' �5� �b� `� t s:. 0-,q:;4-=,--,.,s ,,,, . :. � . w,, �. _ t , cd�a€ \I1 Alp 0 E" �NOaO ..�,w... � -e.4' 1 Ifi 4\ illy 1-‘''Ci „w', Vl> 9` E - # f''vi;11, ; i� -a 0 1, % ,j /� .2 iE-i -# . ,# ,�. # 4',�j1 5 933 1 I .-t-----„1---------, �1- ,�,`f=v *###-'y 44'* ### # '�\ 11111 II la Ch a _y d \ 1f-, �J 1 f'it,. .*__,,I O 1O ,. \ l3 1\\\.. ' 1/-1 ., z , ` ) 1 f ` II wo, 0 i 'sl \i 0 \Y 0 � % , `1\ X11\\1\, \\ tl ''�►�� N Cli 111 v �, ,_ y,\�,,� '\ Vf S r^:\` '.,\\\'k',' ‘,\\‘‘ , , ll ;i \ �.., , #› A� ♦ „ i1 1 1 .Y ',, „z L.! I , r \ m \ , ,•1 ," "l' iso \;‘s,, • 1\, t,.,,,,„ , , . o 11 \ \ 11 \\v,,,\ ', . \\\;\i\ k\. } \\`` ! r ��1 ' ,X111 \ � III :1,/,/, . \� .: \\\v,\‘‘ �' fi, ‘‘ \ . - . /14 t .iii=N-7 ', >Z\ a tfr\4\ \ /' ' 10 f. \V\ -1 \ `R ' *&/,11 ' \I 11 1`1 \ i /) \\ ��\\\\\\q \ m\v \ .- `', F \�I\' \\ \\ \ '� i' \ \‘‘$') \� ,� \ f1 I ' '.�v 4 _ /v`, ,vVA ri 1vi L 1 _ ' .: \ ,\Itt„ \ A 0 ° Ds '.- ‘;‘,-.1,• \e " fir. /. �e l S �0d0 �v.N^� i .„----2.,,,r1 1 \..00611 ;-'71: iaeipl ASL- 0\,00\ s 1 !' l�t@ 0f1.1 rTi BRACKETTS POINT ;!i l D n t I o =o m $ I jI, RESIDENCE _ A D m r. r Isis i ; ! Ili ORONO,MN i A m Z 7 . 3 I•I• r IA`^A,, N I N -, ,,1 .,,,. , \ \ f / --,-\\ I., \ ----- --'--, - - -- -.-., - -t--- -,.- --- -744.i,,. '.:-.7--;-z,,,,,, ---.-- K r:-..:-.rr ,it'?:.,,,,--747" /7 ' ,V:1/;77,71/1: 17: -,,,,A.,,,,,..7-7p,„,7,..,,,s-, v i .. k , -tarlam.,-,...,.5.4 i. iiiiiii ---- :,-----,'"' ' .- - '- ' -:?..1.:-d-Imal _.....„,.,..„ .. - Thczi V '-. '.:7'-, '. .' _, ,,,er,,'-',`,,,. I .-41 T , 'i Eli A ,, % ... ,, ,_-_,,) 1 P„ -,_ ,L1 ,1 , „,..., p,":,. 7,..., 1 t- - 1 , _— ---- ` ;;;/,,,' ll c \\.‘ *kaVf' ' N.,_ ;11:-. ------ - ' ,jet..?%'.•:-.:-A7- .. , ,-. 1 -- 4,-.. ------,-, \, - 2- - -..,-,....:-.. .-.....,-, 1 ..,..-- ‘, - -—7 -7 ,Itirrii'"' - , r r.;---_,; ..r-„, ei•t4^1,,,, t:1 ,.,::.%-1...-lit271,1;;;:i17-''A:741111Illilllill ,..t..,..._.11 Tlig,11 4 - , _ ' ''. MIN "i''''C';‘11'4:1‘ l'''''''.:: - '.7. i : '-.... '---- ,-- pl %' ' `,, i..k.3:;1 ' 1.4 : _ '1 A ,"', ,i3 1'17.7-lei 5:.,'I IV 2 ' ". /git 1,-;''!1 'i. ' r _ 7---- .---d? L.,.,.'''' ,.,.1___ __ --,- . --,--,...--,,,- -- ,..i , 7-ali I ir:' f • -- . ,..„„, ,:c . .. . ,.., , N 1,•,,,,705111,,,111„.AI =..---- -s:f•77—`,gg 'z'-''S:-. '7, "" BPP,LL 41" Cill :,-;,-,:.:-.. :.*:i'',:' •.'''' 2,:;:,. 4 - FL-''',7,- .:2:1 ,-.1 E ''-'77-,,,f1 !-::;:i,' .tirf,... 7 ,f,r g..:,•1 ' m ----- p.,,,,66,6..6, I . •.. o f „._____i, .,,. _, 1 0 .. r------www__ _______ 1 ,, 1 ,.: 0 k .1i MP .._111 ,. ..d fal i e. Ili o,. .: -.._.! rJ to.. . ma_ 1 ��� fib 1 rf r.T: i • ® ®I ill Ety ! 4 O f 1 1 } 1 . 1- L O o, --.,- o�. .... desi. - 1. .,t,',4. .._ BPP, �w oLzLmuCv.weo ,0NUMBER f r ,7:::1n o HOME d, :.k.= - .., 1 MPH 1111•111% ., . - liLI 1 NA - - - _II=-*.F. 13 '.7 . 107 , AW•ri _Iii . .... _ Am c> -I Pr !_, J1, ici O® ,0 or J= _,L 1 1 PI - 1111111111-1 •- NEM- Al=11 ,12 WIIIIIIIN bi All) ki ki lis ,man- ail Q 110 461W -el • . 2 C ii lik Itid _ . -m q Inn LI IIPTAI w ,.... (7) STRuCTURAL ENGINEER GENERAL CONTRACTOR °,.0,-0^.".,NN'.u''N`.. OCSia r! E, _ . 2 11:•i,,.. -1,,"', .t,Ft,...t HOME l g - :7= f.':7: From: Adam Edwards To: Melanie Curtis Subject: RE:Grading Review-LA19-000019/1400 Bracketts Point Rd Date: Thursday,March 7,2019 2:46:06 PM Melanie, Assuming the haul route does not end at the intersection of 15 and 19, it is fine. Applicant should be aware that Bracketts Point Road will be subject to spring road restriction (4T). Adam From: Melanie Curtis Sent:Wednesday, March 6, 2019 4:27 PM To: Adam Edwards<aedwards@ci.orono.mn.us> Subject: Grading Review- LA19-000019/ 1400 Bracketts Point Rd Adam We have received an application for an interim use permit for the export of more than 500 cubic yards of material from 1400 Bracketts Point Road in conjunction with construction of a new home,"club house" guest house building, tennis court, and pool. I haven't reviewed closely enough to see if they are disturbing more than 50 cubic yards in the 75-foot setback, please confirm. Please review the plans, haul route, etc within the file located: Z:\Zoning Applications\2019 #LA18-000091 thru\LA19-000019 (1400 Bracketts Point Rd) IUP-CUP. I'm looking for comments from you on the hauling, etc at this stage only as this will go to PC on April 15th. You will be asked to review the grading plans in their entirety at Building Permit time. Comments by/before April 1st please. Thank you. 0:06e, Melanie Curtis, Planner Direct 952.249.4627 Planning &Zoning Office 952.249.4620 2750 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 Email: mcurtis@ci.orono.mn.us Website: www.ci.orono.mn.us All permitting is now done through our new online portal - LINK. RUN DATE:03/06/2019 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:1 38 11-117-23 32 0017 FERNDALE PROPERTIES LLC 1300 BRACKETTS POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 FERNDALE PROPERTIES LLC C/O CHRIS LAKE LAW FIRM 20840 PRAIRIE HILLS LA PRIOR LAKE MN 55372 38 11-117-23 32 0022 WAYZATA BAY LLC 38 ADDRESS PENDING ORONO MN 00000 WAYZATA BAY LLC 1280 BRACKETTS POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 11-117-23 32 0023 WAYZATA BAY LLC 38 ADDRESS PENDING ORONO MN 00000 WAYZATA BAY LLC 1280 BRACKETTS POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 11-117-23 32 0025 JAMES R&MARY J JUNDT 38 ADDRESS PENDING ORONO MN 00000 JAMES R&MARY J JUNDT 42486 109TH WAY SCOTTSDALE AZ 85262-5127 38 11-117-23 33 0005 MARK C&LAURIE S HEADRICK 1480 BRACKETTS POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 MARK C&LAURIE S HEADRICK 1480 BRACKETTS POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 11-117-23 33 0007 BRUCE PADDOCK 1450 BRACKETTS POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 BRUCE PADDOCK 1500 BRACKETS POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 11-117-23 33 0008 BRUCE PADDOCK ET AL 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 00000 BRUCE PADDOCK 920 SHADY LA WAYZATA MN 55391 38 11-117-23 33 0009 BRUCE PADDOCK ET AL 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 00000 BRUCE PADDOCK 920 SHADY LA WAYZATA MN 55391 Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases.Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available.The viewer should understand,however,that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties,either express or implied,or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. Hennepin Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Date: 3/6/2019 eillIMMEIMMIT :1280 - + a � ;KN1265 AY -h} . z imiginesilitintr a -- -7, i VNI:111182114ValiallOMOR110.8181WLTY i - .-,-,,..-•-„,:,-,..;-,,,,,,,,..1-twassmapuNigetika. -..,,,,. ‘:::::."i::.;j-.E,- ii.f.:ii:E:ii;Iltgifilapiltaiii .,1::!:!::::::!:,7:::,'::::!:::.;:::::-,il,', \„;,,,.,..., a rfa',.."j� - i,iiialut,,,,,,,,,,,i,, gr.: fi .. . iU1L.C '";- s k iss43it.tx — , .77....777....„,,....- ,1}r N-1:1:111.f":7!mrlfi....Ell...!:f:rii:t..i.liiii.,;,:i-i3.ii..ii;.L.1,.i,i,i':ii.."1:::::.*-;'' Vrt _NAlle . 1480 r: ' 1450 Cil r ' Ak , 11 r # s€.- ' 1500 i €e Buffer Size: 500 0 50 100 200 Feet Map Comments: I I I 1 I I 1 I I 1400 Bracketts Point Road This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (i)is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (ii) is notsuitable for legal,engineering or surveying purposes.Hennepin County shal not be liable for any damage,injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information,contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South,Minneapolis,MN 55487/g i s.i nfo©hennepi n.us Date Application Received: 03/06/19 �O1 VO Date Application Considered as Complete:03/06/19 60-Day Review Period Expires: 05/05/19 To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members < Dustin Rief, City Administrator �kESH°¢� From: Melanie Curtis, Planner WOG Date: 15 April 2019 Subject: #LA19-000020,Veniamin "Ben" Bocharnikov,3593 Crystal Place, Variances Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting front and side yard setback variances, and a driveway setback variance in order to construct additions to the existing home. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval. Background The existing home has a partial second story and no garage, and is situated 3.4 feet from the east lot line.The homeowner proposes to construct a garage addition to the rear of the home as well as add living space above the new and existing portions of the home. Side setback variances to allow building expansions 3.4 feet from the east side lot line where a 7.5 foot setback is required for the majority of the additions;the additions will be conforming on the west side lot line. A front yard setback variance is required to construct the covered entry over the stoop 23 feet from the front where a 30 foot setback is required. The proposed driveway is shown 1 foot from the west property line,where a 5 foot setback is required. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-350&78-1405(5)-Setbacks: LR-1C Required Existing Proposed Front House 30' House 17.6' House No Change Addition 23' Rear House 30' House 85' Garage Addition 75' East Side House 7.5' House 3.4' House No Change Additions 3.4' House 7.5' House 14.3' House 8' West Side Driveway ±2' Garage Addition 21.3' Driveway 5' Driveway ±1' Section 78-350-Lot Area/Width: LR-1C Lot Area Lot Width Required 21,780 s.f. (0.5 acres) 100' Actual 7,571 s.f. (0.17 acre) 49.8' FILE#LA19-000020 15 April 2019 Page 2 of 5 Section 78-1403-Structural Building Coverage: Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 7,571 s.f. (0.17 acre) Allowed: 2,000 s.f. [Sec. 78-1403(a)2] Existing: 1,117 s.f. Proposed: 1,483 s.f. Section 78-1680 and 78-1700-Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Overlay District Total Area in Allowed Existing Proposed Tier Zone Hardcover Hardcover Hardcover 2,649 s.f. 2,399 s.f. 2,535 s.f. Tier 3 7,571 s.f. (35%) (31.7%) (33.5%) Applicable Regulations: Side Yard Setback Variance(Section 78-350) The existing home on the property is situated 3.4 feet from the east side lot line.There is no garage on the property.The applicant is proposing to maintain the 3.4 foot setback for the garage addition as well as the additions over the existing home to facilitate additional square footage.The property is nonconforming as to width, and per 78-350, may utilize a setback no less than 7.5 feet. The footprint expansions on the west side of the home will be conforming at 8 feet where a 7.5 foot setback is required. Front Yard Setback Variance (Section 78-350) Though the lot is nonconforming as to area, and therefore eligible for the front yard setback reduction exception found in Section 78-350(b)(3)that is based on the surrounding setbacks, the neighboring front yards are 30 and 33 feet. The 2nd story additions will primarily conform to the 30 foot front setback;the proposed covered entry porch at 23 feet will not encroach nearer to the street than the existing footprint but will be a new setback encroachment requiring a variance. Driveway Setback Variance(Section 78-1405) The existing gravel driveway will be reduced and moved west to accommodate access past the home and provide access to the side load garage addition in the rear.There is an existing privacy fence on the west lot line screening this driveway and its' impacts from the adjacent neighbor. Please see the City Engineer's comments attached as Exhibit H regarding the driveway and maneuverability. Governing Regulation:Variance(Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health,safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties FILE#LA19-000020 15 April 2019 Page 3 of 5 also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.537 Subd. 6(2)variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The proposed variances are in harmony with the purpose of the Ordinance. The small lot includes difficulties in its small size and width. The applicants request to maintain the substandard setback on the east side may be reasonable considering the 34 foot setback of the eastern neighbor's home from the subject property resulting in a 37.4-foot separation between the two homes (existing and proposed). 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The proposed variances to expand the home on a nonconforming lot of record are consistent with the comprehensive plan. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; the request to permit construction of the additions to the home on the substandard lot, in the proposed location within the front and side yard setbacks, appears to be somewhat reasonable as the property's reduced size and width create difficulties. The hardcover level, building coverage, and encroachments proposed within the required yards in addition to the driveway setback appear to be reasonable. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; the uniquely small size and width, and required setbacks prevent a reasonable residential footprint. and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The proposed footprint is smaller than the permitted 2,000 square feet.The other properties in the neighborhood have similar setback challenges, the subject property will not be out of character with the neighborhood. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn.Stat. §216C.06,subd. 2,when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78.This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.This condition is not applicable, as a residential home is an allowed use in the LR-1C District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling.This condition is not applicable. FILE#LA19-000020 15 April 2019 Page 4 of 5 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property.The property's substandard size and width, create difficulties which also apply to many of the properties in the same neighborhood. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located.The property's substandard size and width,create difficulties which also apply to many but not all of the properties in the same neighborhood. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Granting front and side yard setback variances and the driveway setback variance is necessary for the preservation of the property right of the applicant. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the requested driveway setback, side yard,and front yard setback variances in this unique situation is not contrary to the intent of the zoning chapter. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty.The variances for setback are necessary, and do not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances.Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Practical Difficulties Statement Applicant has provided supporting documentation regarding the applicable Practical Difficulties attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Practical Difficulties Analysis The existing home, at the nonconforming setback, can legally be rebuilt in kind.Staff finds the lot width and size, and existing home setbacks are practical difficulties preventing an upward expansion of the home or a logical additions to the home. The flexibility afforded by the Zoning code from the side and front yard setbacks do not eliminate the need for variances for this project. Engineer Comments The City's Engineer provided comments, attached as Exhibit H. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? FILE#LA19-000020 15 April 2019 Page 5 of 5 Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval of the front yard and side yard setback variances for the addition. The applicant should assure the roof does not drain to the east, and the new driveway does not drain to the west on to the neighbor's property. Additionally the driveway should be adjusted at the street so to accommodate the City Engineer's recommendations. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Existing& Proposed Survey& HC Calcs Exhibit D. Staff Annotated Survey Exhibit E. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit F. Site Photos Exhibit G. Aerial Photos Exhibit H. City Engineer Memo Exhibit I. Property Owners List Exhibit J. Plat Map Land Use Application Summary Application Date: 03/06/2019 Address: 3593 CRYSTAL PL WAYZATA, MN 55391 Parcel Number: 1711723430032 Land Use Number: LA 19-000020 Application Submitted By: Property Owner Owner: Name: VENIAMIN BOCHARNIKOV Address: OLENA BOCHARNIKOV 3593 CRYSTAL PL WAYZATA, MN 55391 Applicant: Name: Veniamin Bocharnikov Address: 3593 Crystal PI Orono, MN 55391 Chomellc@yahoo.com Contact Information: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Project Description: Addition/Garage Land Use Application Type: Amendmend Application 'J Appeal of Admin Decision L. Concept Application C;' Conditional Use Permit LJ Site Plan Application L_I Subdivision Application Subdivision Exception t-J Vacation Application Li Variance Application J Applicant Signature: 62-Y1 PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM LA19-000020 1.The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter. Response: I propose to build a attached garage to the existing house. Garage will need a variance to accommodate set back regulations. 2. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. Response: House currently doesn?t have garage, to build a functional one it needs to be in proposed area to allow access and not go over hard cover. 3.The variance, if granted,will not alter the essential character of the locality. Response: Attached garage will be build to astatically match existing house and fit in with the surrounding homes. 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. Response: Do to the current location of the house a detached garage will not allow proper driveway access due to set back regulations. 5. Practical difficulties include, but are not limited to, inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems.Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes,Section 1167.06,Subd. 2,when in harmony with this Chapter. Response: N/A 6. The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. Response: N/A 7.The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. Response: N/A 8.The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. Response: Left side of the house is currently at 3?4? set back. 9.The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. Response: It does not. 10.The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Response:There is currently no garage on site. Current set back regulations will not allow functional garage and driveway access. 11.The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health,safety,comfort,morals,or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. Response: Correct. 12.The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Response:There is no garage currently on the property. 1 Building Permit Survey Prepared for: Ben Bocharnikov -} 11 Henn. Co. Regional Railroad Auth. 0 h o h 1 I 1 1 I BituminousRood 1 1 ` 1 -S7y R.O.W.1 of H.CR.R.A Pr xt 1 oP Y �. 50 . � I Bituminous Road I 1 R, Crystal: laceo Legend N8752 01"W N • Found Iron Monument {-4.9.,88_._(pom ) 50 (plat)_ II -w Prop:---' _ ._ ,_ y = r 1 Permeable, E, f wI E / ", Sidewalk co 1•• I ,,SI // (85 84'8') _ d Site Address: I zr-`,� -Stoop 3593 Crystal Place -., ,..-----....,4.;, &Steps Orono, MN 55391 I ti,,, 'Ioi 16.. /� r� r —� �g`9 t, c o � '1 `13.4 _.. I ' }3.• IIII - Z De�e`ln= 13 4\��I o`14. �.-i • 3.4 C r p Boundary Description (supplied by client) w • or /as \ a Lot 11, Block 3, NAVARRE HEIGHTS, according to the II o I 3 recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. /y .1 _{_- ' E. Ps / Subject to any and all easements of record. jo^ i 0. I xisting pus ' a 0ooN,, cN - II 8.0 {� � ./ eWw fw� . L 1 14.3 •-C•cnrete / � .k�`�� Proposed Hardcover Calculations(sa. ft.) /w <' ( - / s �' Proposed Attached Garage 625 '-- I"t - �M���� / :,p_ILS: 38.1 Proposed Driveway983 j 13.3 �� v�ied . { Existing House 858 / •I �� ,n� 'etaining--� 4 Concrete 31 - E�Ees�nsrr "c. .--20.a si m� ate= 3 J, WO os 4 Stoop&Steps 38 W Ca. CZII } II , Z535 a 12 v�Q Ieta n WO oo /�% 3 Lot,Area 7571 N 2(.1i-.1.:-- ___.5._0_4,. ..•./ • `/c,, 41 E O \ �`N Total Hardcover 33.5 01 N^ I I °° '3.6/-•- :••\,,,,,,s•---O Ov h -�J- '' OObi -1- ©tn 1., Existing Hardcover Calculations (so. ft.) -moi 78 - �� O e. House 1,021 y\ ',�. 'h Gravel Driveway 832 `aConcrete 118 • m .,\ Pavers 261 .2"8,%4 - c"` . m ^ Stoop&Steps 38 V y o rn N I •.c '95 `, Retaining Wall 33 / � ; 6,-"---,,�� - Shed 96 _V A vI2,399 _ ;r, Lot Area 7,571 - 76 18.3 `� �`� % Total Hardcover 31.7% %% v t'''' e � ,N I p, ? •Improvements grayed out ore �� proposed to be removed. --q(.7-_,,, .9 c, ► - 17.2- I SCALE c-Fence m zo o 'o zo w 1 V N89;38'll"E —1 11 inch = 20 feet 50.06 (comp.)�., 1 I 963--u50 (plot) ri► A'n "s Bearings based on assumed datum. Job Number: 8805 SCHOBORG I hereby pare cerby my that this cermy oate of io was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and Book/Page: LL that l am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the LA D SERVICES lows of the State of Minnesota. Survey Date: 1/11/19, 2/5/19 , J��. Drawing Name: bocharnikov.dwg INC �nr�—'- Drawn by. DMS Paul B. Schoborg Revisions: 1/31/19 (prop. drveway/gorage) 763-972-3221 8997 Co. Rd. 13 SE Dote: 1:56 4, 7i 7/7 C Registration No. 14700 2/7/19 (contours) wwwSchoborgLond.com Delano, MN 55328 Building Permit Survey Prepared for: Ben Bocharnikov _ _ —f _ A Henn. Co. Regional Railroad Aith. 0 h o h I I lBituminous Road I Z-S7y R.o.W.l of H.C.R.R.A Property Wap 50 3w7_ Bituminous Rood,. N I Cry Crystal Place o New/proposed Legend I I N87'2 01"w N footprint • Found Iron Monument Proposed i-4 .-88.(cam..) 50 (plat) Driveway 1 3 _pray -- — — — _ :(i s Permeable i 6'S` L, __ IE j,.n Sidewalk e ti' s \ wSite Address: -Stoop � 3593 Crystal Place c a_....},. &Steps j Orono, MN 55391 3 'SSS O Dec 13.4`,\ 0..14 .,3 I. -.....1 ..�,34 '[O aoundary Description (supplied by client) i b va Lot 11, Block 3, NAVARRE HEIGHTS, according to the 2 %� , recorded plat thereof Hennepin County, Minnesota. �mp ) o / Subject to any and all easements of record. � —96'1 'ly""-`" vesting pus ,L, c o j � t = a m o, ell 18-O — // ill 0,11. 1 a' U, Proposed Hardcover Calculations(sa. ft) r1.1W SF_ 74'3 �e' / � '� Proposed Attached Garage 625 j C - ����� - `-38-1 -? Proposed Driveway 983 13.3 i��. - aown Sed `9�, Existing House 958 ___y�- in. �I: /? � 'etoining--� Concrete 31 -� _ j a Citi1111111M. 05 - v`3 W°TF�96. 4`o Stoop &Steps 38 _� i., .. ' 4 U ..�, \ Z535 12 ��I. — 2 9 Hall,..2ao /sa , , X37.3 ---- y Lot:Area 7,571 1-- Q ,Y- N �' I ;W E O Total Hardcover 33.5% O ro \V/z/.1 ��, O V cr1� _] 1.13.6 -�-I 'v�Oo�i i \ p a)^ Existing Hardcover Calculations(so. ft.) -y1 78. - ''y • c3 House 1,021 \ �� :v6, Gravel Driveway 832 \ v' Concrete 118 • w Pavers 261 e a� �, `" Stoop &Steps 38 �y c°l' -rte \1/, '96----- Retaining Wall 33 W U(i 9o'S-� \ • (VJ - Shed 96 2,399 --� 7.6 - N \ ? \ Lot Area 7,571 - 18.3 r // \`\ % Total Hardcover 31.7% �\ I c •Improvements grayed out ore Nproposed to be removed. i o �I 9� 1' - 17.2 - SCALE -Fence `s 20 — , N8938'11T 7_ I 50.06 (comp.) T 1 inch = 20 feet 1 —968--.50 (plat) #2h Bearings based on assumed datum. Job Number: 8805 SCHOBORG I hereby pare bycertify that thisdcertmy cate of surveio was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and Book/Page: LL that/am a duly Registered Land Surveyor under the LA D SERVICES lows of the State of Minnesota. Survey Date: 1/11/19, 2/5/19 Drawing Name: bocharnikov.dwg INC / v— ---,4`" -- Drawn by. DMS Paul B. Schoborg Revisions: 1/31/19 (prop. drveway/garage) 763-972-3221 8997 Co. Rd. 13 SE Date: f)e 7i zd/9 Registration No. 14700 2/7/19(contours) www.SchoborgLand.com Delano, MN 55328 _ _ _RIDGE VENT —Z�— .�„�P� ~.. .- _.__ '- ASPHALT SHINGLES M'._ A — I_ f \. _ AVA Studio /��Addtion Roof -_ — Phone'612 532 8159 J 17.11 7/8• - - Email prohomeextenor@yahoo cam t��I I�I ISI'= I!! AwMwu70_,,, soFFIT I■III _' = ;ND FADF AVASTUDIO.HOUZZ.COM �-' W W DOW AND DOOR TRIM TW. -In'- GENERAL NOTES: • — %6 HAND FRAME NEW ROOF PROVE P,-Additian_Floar _ _ ��_ _ FRONT ENTRr _ ALL GENERAL ARE TO BE CONTRACTOR AND DTH DV THE W,Y 1034 E MUNICIPAL ILII_ IIS _ _ _ \= AI BOLDING OFFICIAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION _ _ ■ I_ It — _ _ VA STUDIO LLC.W NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANV PROBLEM ASA RESULT OF AN■:■ 2,0, ERROR OMISSION ON THESE PLANS. iiim —11 ■• )ttA 6X6 612OS TFRAMED OUT I . M\` f COLUMN = = I r LP LAP SIDING (�_r__Floor _ V 0' 0" 1111111 1 , 1 I I I 1 I I 1 1111111 --- - I OFront Elevation —ICN INSTALL DRIP 1 p r1— I—i—III ill III 111-111-11l—l11-11 I CAP wra' r It1r�ftl—i lull III Int III Iti III iii Itl lit III ill III III III III III IYr r-o- RIDGE VENT e.16� SH GLES I'/ fi II' me —mu ALUMWUM ` I =ens •D �� = = SOFFIT AND =1 =_= 4 SCIA — eq MINDOw '•rill ,1.L.:. n _ . LP LAP SIDING 3593 Crystal Place Orono MN s munimII 6.DOORTRM Frond and Right i� Elevations ,, . _liiiiil illli— PrTo(Ranter 3593 X UM lull s =1�n-- m= aro vlw2dar PM . •.. IIMINNI nwR Nr -Alexander Bochernikov Chet.by 11 I I 1 l 1 I I 1 I & I I I I I I I I I I I I I I — 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' 1 1 1'I'I 1'I I� A01 ®Righ1/4"t= vation scale Elelevy ASPHALT SHINGLES AII. DGE VENT AVA Phone:612532 8159 u Email'proho TOAST nor@yahoo corn AVASTUDIO.HOUZZ.COM SCUD SOFFIT Ur TYPE%SOFFIT "DERLERLAMENT— GENERAL NOTES: GENERAL ANS ARE TOLCONTRA T REVIEWED BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND THE MUNICIPAL .::4-'-::-.::,." BUILDING OFFICIAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ---7,,...:"--Y7,--f—_ , A.STUDIO LLC ISNOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY PROBLEM AS A RESULT OF AN .�„ .... - ERROR OMISSION ON THESE PLANS. cem MTEo we!, 59'TYPE%GYP BD OVER OSB SHEATHING OUTSIDEH - — AND Se'TYPE%GYP.eO SHEATHING INSIDE \\\'\\ ST ELEVATION ONLY LP LAP SIDING f I I I 1 I I I 11111 l l l 1l 1 1 1 1 1 1 l l 1 OLeft Elevation 1/4"=1'-0' ALUMINUM MN M_ SOFFIT AND -� FASCIA MEM T BM M_—BM —BM M11111 — NM -- 3593 Crystal Place Orono MN I . Rear and Left Elevations - IP-- - Pr D. �umNRr 3593 Miloa vle/20Ie SBe:Ba PM Drawn Br Author LP LAP SIDING CS&V.VS0 Checker I 11 ........1I 1I -1 I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 I I I I A I 2 Hear Elevation A02 /4' 1'-0' scab ADDITION F. . ... l C.nAVA Studio Phone:612 532 8159 1 TOP COURSE I' \ Email:pr°homeexted°r@yahoo.Com 6'x 0'X 16"CONC.BLOCK 4 COURSES 1V x 0'X 16'GONG.BLOCK FOUNDATION WALL zBx ED FOOTING AVASTUDIO.HOUZZ.COM I D s� 6 'P GENERAL NOTES: :13..U'I'' PurvaARErDBEREVIEWEDBYTHEkn NERAL CONTRACTORAND THEMUNICIPALUnexcavated ® ILDIrvGOFF IALPRIGRroDGNSTRUGroh. VA STUDIO LLC.IS NOT RESPONSIBLE a R ArvYPROBLEM AG AREBDLT DF ANROR OMISSION ON THESEPUNS. ni =I.PROVIDE II)#402'.0'LONG DO EL@ PROVIDE II)Y<%2'.0 LONG DOWEL@ TOP COURSE AND MIDDLE COURSE 8 TO'COURSE AND MIDDLE COURSE 6 MI fa T-0'LONG DOWELS @ STRIP P•••ING. 121 2.-0-LONG DOWELS @STRIP FOOTING.o PDXY GROUTED WTO EXISTING E'a. GROUTED INTO EXISTING WALL(6.MIN.EMBED)6 GROUT NEW ALL A LEs(%IN.EMBED)e GROUT NEW WALL m CORES SOLO AT DOWELS040....- 4 CO ES SOLID AT DOWELS ,,,, L ... . . . _i*.,__ ___ 7F• , . . ... • ••,,,, ♦ 5 G F♦ ►♦f FXOO . F. IP JOISTSCONC ETE SUB(FIELD VER FY) ►♦ :4 ♦ FL)STING ►♦. JOISTS pj 6 ♦ ...' F♦ �♦ V /� • Crawl Space :8y 1 % J j�J? ►i �' MB TREATLEDGED ► ♦ FASTEENED°W F� /LEDGERLOKs ..L -, p3"STAGGERED.MIN. \ ' � - - ....• �;. ♦ _ --�� 2X0 TREATED �� _ — GI6r6 N. 3593 Crystal Place e. �11 4.EXISTWGBRICK LEDGE 's. 4.I II II Orono MN °VERWID0NIPGAP ,' ° II Foundation Plan E 11.,— �1r .F . A G P.COM PIER F�, x ;I, BELIED TO DV PIER - Prgecr number 3593 IF �o GC @I I X6"BELOW GROUND WITH are 9/2013 sag.PM 5 N ABAZ66 POST 0000 0 ♦11 SE ATTACHMENT To 66am by Alexander BochaMkoV 4 ♦I I POST w/(111/2.GIA. °m 0']1? i� 1T11rz' �t 6 1 CHOR BOLT IVP. Checked by '`` 41A03 caW space \ L' O 1/4".1'-0• Scab 1/4'=1-0' 121 1OHOR. (2):o: . i \\\ / \ AVA Studio '� \ Phone.612 532 8159 Email.prohomeextenor@yahoo.com •,y''/ s-10- AVASTUDIO.HOUZZ.COM so gree '=.8 GENERAL NOTES: G GS f GA LNPEUANARoeaaEOwTO C .,Garage 25x25n BU LD NG=CAL PRIOR TO GONSTRUG TION AVA STUDIO LLC.a NOT RESPONSIBLE A06 It ETD O FORERROR OANV M PROSSBONLEMON AS THAESERESULTPIANS OF AN ril NOTED WALLS I B CE LINO TREATED STIR FRAMNG CT BaxMMT%ADS ND RISERS //f 8'E G EB USSES� OC •.' \ FIRE RATED WALL 5/6'TYPE%GYP BD OVER /- / •/ OSB SHEATH NG OUTSIDE D 5/8'TYPE%GYP.BD M SHEATHING INSIDE b MOVES G a EAST ELEVATION ONLY STTVPE%SHEATHING-' Ind TIIzl-zx o T 6P' _1_ 1l $ \ l � Mach Rm. \„ 9' O ria-x oar IA N 1 1 Kitchen 9 S1a' ti 'CELNG / m 6 ooD FLaoR< _ i� pi a b \ 7I IryI /y B a m IS^►3 FAN .-•a . DDS lY m .�Ti �\ n _ ea'CEILING 3 I' M 1 WOODa- 9!iCPAWL} . ® ® Lam- SPACE� � =_ACCESS B%lin,7_ BENCH \ ' 0 F , rM oN m a�\\ rm e • rL1 �\ 2PLY18'LVL ()141—;,,!----\'-g\:\ B 1 \ TALL WALL2%e@ 1POc (ELI SH) F RE BLOGKNG®IB � CO ERE) 1 3593 Crystal Place T n c PO CH. I^ E. .M TLiving Room c DARTorvF P: DE%NG '" Orono MN OODFLOOR SMMVM I 6%6 PoST FRAMED OLD LL —� a-.cEILNG SO FT. TO 1Y%12'COLUMN First Floor EXISTNG ROOF JOISTS ABOVE E, __—- /6's' / em num. 3593 / 5 / TREATED STAIR FRAMING D. 9'211993938 PM CEDAR TREADS AND RISERS O First Floor '3MIN N.MKRISRI Checked y1 Alexander BOCharnikov 1/4'=1'-D' a i a J , 1 1 1 x�� NEW WINDOW IN EXISTING OPENING A04 Scala 26P \ 0'-tP BI�TP •-T 6tP 0 0 T 2 2' / N, \\\ 1X12%,O MR (x1-2% HDR. ---/ \` `1 \ TEMPERED 1�30,60 AVA Studio Phone 6125328159 3 •ieiiue •` - ^\ Emal.prohomeextedor@yahoo.com o LFu. a / AVASTUDIO.HOUZZ.COM — Master Suite Bath B °TED GEL NG b �_� `T °°R L NOTES: 761 &- F ENG ROOF TRUSSES@ Oc ABO —> • :G:Ert:71,ri;,,,,LE47Nolw:E7ATi:,!,: REVIEWED BY THE —_ _ _ r OR AND THE MUN CPAL o %� w OR TO CONSTRUCT ON-Cal E .C.06 BLEn == - - `i POCIO=T ® \ ' OM SS ON ON THERE PLANS. +% FAN __44--,� D.Fµ-� -—-—- ---i-8... / __ = I . s va' aea.' _� I FAN_---_�-I WAC —_Iq. I_ `w n e — � 1 CARPET Roc.Iti e = Bath —<i v nFLoon zrxBa' _ m A nc T. Ix,,=,°HDR. cr En 1ao•XaP w��_ Bedroom 2 yX� L :< e Bedroom 3 0'1 1IB'CEILING 0'1 iB'CEILING x I'3'%il'S' $ 'R CARPET FLOOR .O CARPET FLOOR E. w ^�—? R 12 P e 0 O - ®6 /'JO'XEU ^ t a• O H ^ H Bedroom 4 m \ ` t=i1R1' VIN b t00T%92EILING LA I \\\\ennui%%// H R •.- 'L� � CARPET FLOOR 3"�" WN FLOOP N __ ``` a,X%,OHD4'" ,BHnR 3593 Crystal Place (x,2x18 HDR. Mr ,. - .101. �T T 0 � —_,3:10. Orono MN /B'-ia.' 1� -� ,B — � 7....- _ � --_ Second Floor - _—._ _ _ — — PrSSSSSOSAI 3593 --____—.-.1,_-_ _ . - D.N T/,&x01999931 PM ---- t .. oavn by Alexander Bocharn kov _-�– - P 05 SASS ,/4•_p-O• i� ROLL /; VENT ROOT 1500 TH.VALLEYS 6 TURTLE VENTS ONLY / Y\ ALL ROCW/WALL W TERSECTIONS RIDGE VENT -- 30 YR ARCHITECTURAL ASPHALTIC SHINGLES AVA Studio ,Sa ASPHALT FELT a'0 L . - Phane:6125328159 qcogwreLESAD PwRsCODEI a`j -°t / f 1 Emai:prohomeeMerior@yah oD .Com 10.P O.SHTG.WCLIPS ENG.ROOF TRUSSES@2."O.C. AIR CHUTE(PRovoE UNOBSTRUCTED AIR cowl ..... —-_ — .. ` — Addition Roof __ (R-xAl BLOW IN INSULATION ,I 1T-117/8"u AVASTUDIO.HOUZZ.COM a MIL.POLY VAPOR BARRIER SM.TYPE%SOFFIT q-498OW IN INSUL. .1 GYP.CEILING BD. AND FASc W V.B. UNDERIAYMENT '.-°I T .MIL.POLY.NB'64,BD. GENERAL NOTES: EAST ELEVATION I . FASCIA ONLY 2%6 SUB FAS.6' ALL PLANS ARE TO BE REVIEWED BY THE ALUMINUM FASCIA GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND THE MUNICIPAL ALUMINUM VENTED SOFFIT ■ ■I a BUILDING OFFICIAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. AVA STUDIO LLC.ISNOT RESPONSIBLE IIIII .'OSB SUBFL. FOR ANY PROBLEM AS A RESULT OF AN WALL: IIall1i Addition FlOD_r�� ERROR OMISSION ON THESE PLANS. 1/21 GYP.BD.TYRA-MIL. •��.�:ON1.444Te• G7wEe-gU65E5®2s'OG.•♦'♦•♦•♦�♦���.:0; 9-103/3 (R201 FBGLS.BATT WSULATION �� _,0 `� _ 2x6 STUDS@Ie'OG. T Flrst Floor ,6'OSB SHEATHING 8'.y° At30FIBERGLISS BATT INSULATION "'�� q TYVAKE HOUSE WRAP , MIL POLY V.B. SIDING PER ELEVATIONEXTERIOR Se'TYPE%GYP.BD. 1 C RIM PP WALLS SOVERHEATHING 13 6'OSBRIMSHEATVING EBIEVE WALL SHEATHING / 2%4 CONTINUOUS RIBBON BD. ST ELEVATION (,.20)CLOSED SELL FOAM INSUL RIM ONLY A'CONC.GARAGE FLOOR URASEAL OR SAME OLTP_ — _ — l\ _ _ _ _ First FI°°r FDurvDA — —�_ ( _ Y I JN 0'� UT DIAMETER A.B.W/T MIN.EMBEDDED 6 21 11-111—III-111-1 —II 11=1 I1—III—III—III—rII-1 —II—Ill --FIT=I 711 I _—0'U 111/2" SIDE%,ff HIDKSQUARE DRPODrvD —111-111-111-111 :111_• III—III—III—III..-11L—III-III—III III III—III m—I1 —111-1111111 COUNTERSINK WASHERS@ T2'AND WITHIN 12' ILII • ��I6 MIL VAPOR BARRIER —111— _ FROM EACH CORNER B WINDOW WELL _-11 I— I— —1I VIII II -OVER VAPOR BRRCOMPACTED FILL— 1I-111—I III=III— —CRWS0g.. III: ASPHALT EMDLSIONPAINTWATERPRDDDrvG —111-111-111-111 NI-111—x111III-111-111-111-111-111-111-111-111-111—•II•II-I IL111-1114 .31/21— 1-1 MOO CMU BLOCK TOP COURSE II—III—III—III—III—III—III—III III III—III—III—III—III III III III -II III—III—III III III III—III: CMU BLOCK A COURSES BUR.OF FOOT.TO BE 42'BELOW GROUND OSBCUOn1 0" 201 X B'CONC.FrG.w/(2)w REBAR 4t=1' 5000 PSI M W COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH 3593 Crystal Place Orono MN Garage and House Section Project umber 3593 Dila V19/20199:39.PM Drawn by Alexander Bocharnikov A06 Scale 1 i AVA Studio Phone:612 532 8159 Email:prohomee%terior@yahoo.com AVASTUDIO.HOUZZ.COM GENERAL NOTES: ALL PUNS ARE TO BE REVIEWED BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR AND THE MUNICIPAL SOLID SOFFIT BUILDING OFFICIAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCT. Sr TYPE%GYP.BD AVA STUDIO LLC.IS NOT RESPONSIBLE SHEATHING EAST ELEVATION ONLY FOR ANY PROBLEM ASA RESULT OF AN 5.PCASE NOTES: ERROR OMISSION ON THESE PIANS. Il Treads must be a minimum of I Cnand •=ietPWIrcifi,,d, ,77-P-.2W3..-e-P,- ----,-.:-.- ----- -=.--7—.=-=-- E---- - maximum a reedential stairs ..__ _ 12"ENERGY HILL " � naMreYmust be3a m f -LL _ _ _ ae'abe.enosewbeae _ . _ _ ewel is sate betweenpost �rt��Irtttu��Hr�tHr�ttlr�Nlr�ttp�NlrI��otNo�ttlr/�lr��ott�oN Io ' HG0 50 less than 00 0050 nloh 011111111111.1.111.1.N11.�11N11411A.111.11111.1.111 b11A�',►111111111U_ _ Addition Hoo' must T-117/6" 000000rana a6^0highom R.B BLOW IN INSUL r_ I _ i' T.O.Second Floor k opensaesMMnain9s Wer m'- - OMIL.POLvVB 16'-41/4"\/ NS HaBmrnerade below. SB'GYP.BD. 1�� I. Handrail m arse must r I X' min to tM xceed Ian 1/4mtlsner SECOND FLOOR not ttooexceed 9/116�s� us @ IF O C _ _1__ ,al� CONUEFLOOR m ` _ Addition Floor ll Qi,T.O4First Floor_ _ y1 II'I1I1II".i■1■i■•I■1■I■I m 111.1111111k 9'-103/4' \� CLOSED SELL FOAM 10500 RM Iii III I DURASEAL OR SAME OLTP. __4i11i1lil - •1 FIRST FLOOR \,11 111 11 EXTERIOR WALL 1%a@tYOC. \�- till _ (I, EXISTING — Irr GTP.BO. 191_I'I I IXIS, UBFLII Iao=I 1:1 ll — 'IA \Yi LJ. Flrst Floor Ali EXISTING FLOOR JOIST ��� 0' ,V Irl _ 1*� A EXISTING � = DUNOATIONWALL �i 1=1 I I:a A space — --_ 10.�4 — EXISTING CRAWL SPACE — ►, - 111 -—=111-1lII1 i c Iii 1-III-III 1 i1 i1 1I IIII-III 1 I11-111-111-111-1 1 II-11 1 III 5 2 3593 Crystal Place 0 1/4"on=10" Orono MN Staircase and House Section Proien number 3593 Dare 219'20I8999ae PM Dawn by Alexander Rotharnikov Checked by A07 50000 � � V � • '1 •, �' a • `�k�ti s •> :7,3''' > . is ys\ rti4 r gRl _ a y ( Y iif! !1 .q ' vs • • • .,, .i �pa k f , '" ;aa ! {5 ', �•� i/M ryy �' L 5�.t a r >�i 4i� : ` . ".'••% "Ilk -'''''..'' 'f',3--,!--....ktts,•,„'4, ' ' ., ' -' • ' ,• ,..1,,,,,i,::',4,- - y. Y ` kcr, t tl s b111,; f, /ice 1 y • !r.. .,".�Y AP Iii,, .,--. :! z ' 4� " r '''z',.-,•,'--:;;;;:–.„.;,,,,_. ;rt .-. � i, A.C* .::- rr Rts — ; . - > re a t ., ;-e %-c.. a ' ' A .,yrs' :,• - - l -X "- '.. �✓t r '�i.E' er - . +' r c t tea r, CT`s y, ".; ' t;;' '�-". yrro�' Y , :r +4 . ° i.Ar : 7 .4 'r`�� n :'- . ,e^ X= 21 .,..1✓rf T I f,'- fig $1 i 9 6s , t v !��'� Sys ��xr 1 4,A liaNtt ►;� r g' �` • bke,..' 'dh,rtr� e�+ �,3" 0!1tir ,� w��"rr s p r 3��� d �� �y�v i tr'# res p -r r�4� I drrSC;' , ) r,,,,,,,:t...o,: .,...5-1,,-.-_..0,-. ... }0, + / / , $� `i�• i � Ac�+y , a e . LA, :14 j/ fir 4 / / 0411P , ~. iA ►it:. ¢, u'� " y `f' ;kat*a ! I 4'mow. y.+`'''r; 1$�'g ,-‘:1-::,::,,,,,N,'''''''.4 , ''^ 't¢ / 4' ,It- ,4%,',„" a. + � r �.` ��� 0. i-0,74%,:,.. i '� a.5h �4 volfril ♦1 mc. ri , \, P' st ... ,,, 3 c t- e. 4. s +?, V di fO p . - 0'..,,,,,tlyik',Itti Re, . i t >1 f AI ,1+ a ' __ � \,n ,0•�igymt fiZ 0',..-.=‘4,0''.,2� n )' 1:Stift°,- ' '14ttv'14 .'1.'' { / „ '4., y` r_! d. a y — zfc 5 .� `. - S - - - 4 s Pro ► ert line p Y stake ` 4q r r-,,,41,4;',., ,, � . r 9 t'l 'may I 0, t 'a+s r .3/4,11.4 . V €' ' t' %,"4„,..t,,\:".-',Ir;', ' .. .+� . t. ! ,, , -4s 't 6.{;fie .,4• �ff , . w �,� r° f!a<rt �� f i'fr ,b°it•3 i�j A ., ar dry,'� r �#t'.+ & g1 Of•I'' ,ya - c is < .i i °i,10 a`• ccs„,-."04410,f *. �,.3� '6s i �' �!rA � F' V 8 Pitt-',.?-', -- f ...� tet t ' ° y, ii��'.+i P i37*LP',” F j l iv to V '�• +,#s �, 1 •, Mfr tl� ?"4 � �yF� =. iiyail .aa 1?r• • ,a\» a r, ,„if ,F g fsl+�, w., ,. , +; ,.,.a iiiIP ' rs ,71 11Jio >�ISS f'3Ys%t a,i��"�,��ri€}� � -� ` Y ! r �' r ��I _ �°': ��s!y�,VQ '.1 ,.., {a° I' y4-c ,:(1-4-1,;.• r.F, `mow ,,tgal• f NET/ /" i,'tii ,�. + ',is;,' •1 t! st.! -4', 4 i ,y,A Jtg!- Y. f:, i` �".fy< S rY A., % r„ ,, \\ 4 --..- :' --1-ProV:i-' t,'''-' .I 40,-;" k.-` ---- Z...._,-'7) '-' i ....,/,/ii „ ' -t � .., -,$r�w4:, fgr,:, _ r 4 . is� ':10. -T '‹l+' ii<�. ` i �'" y, ��%e�.` ` r (� € 3/4 r x��i iF ;°.R �. ,, Yjr 1p I I '`---. k..‘‘' ',1•1 Ai v, #0,1., ,,, .', ,.i.k..„1"Itm , 'f-4,4',./i I VI' ''' .---, ... ', 4 „ ... i \ ,,. ,_ • .__ _. iic till.. ,„ xi t %r�afy l - { a ". i/P-10 41 rd 4 ta . 44 • ''�` ,' t 14 i •y ice k • !,' \ ry . v ,mo , E 14 ` 11 jor a.tfi , r> ��� ��.�,.,s 1f , z -,;-,•-••:,--- --,,-,,,,,---+•� x^54...' ,� �+vK.[ - n 1 rY+ 1 ' _• >r , t T , >+- •'te_.'� - ,� ?�.u `tet e£ -• �a '°` rte' � - � -, q; .. h '^� ,Yw ^°'' -�:''.' r -` �` i u.z�� " � .tea .l�.c".:-:��—.++,R�e., 4 `".E. ,.-+�.- -14-,---1&-7.k•--- rK' i'' 'ms s . - �r°' ... y' + s.� r {r .,fir k -'n,,�, F., .,�c•. ..._ ',1,! � d1 y�, ti.. _ cal ** 4? V Fh. - :, 1,`; °` t. 'r. '.' r/r 1 11,0 Ry`bN: , _ ? r E i -,1•.-v-',,- , xf . ;� t � ; 1" PS. t ,+ Aa, f' ' f`Y Facing North -�'��► Lam'. aims . m yq� P I ® 1� ::'''4,.....:41.;',1:" !g ; "- " -fib -. acY4' • : - _,--- ;I.r-,fr-,,r•rri ,_ ' ,:'° ■■ it i,i :.I ` . + - - +, Cat r, ' '::',.>#0/.( 1,' ' ' • gpKY.y� vR '~ 'x�`' a :�a� `r..._ ^^+ecr:_' } r,•-�. . . } n �'. ' 'yr.4 t4.• a' s �� � yR. - - - -.-, x} - l *cj / t Y ---` • .-:1;-:'::-",L'::::'-...),4•'-"A" +,,,1,1,..:;4111.40'714:.4-4,4',,',S , • .'f.; .sem, 1-"- rL "i • t. , w {°� o; � � ,✓� ®tlrp E Sgl d .„ P316 g al `' 7 • S a $i is e d - k- .a 1Ne f�r. • ((p2 r /� €" �� (F'! +s '' fi.. • r�5 - s•' a e. 5 @ cit @�h�g tri u .,�. �� '� z o<, fl, F • Property Line ,g r • --...% - � stake (facing a "^ North) dr. nn.. `$• -' � <' a +art •.. ti v 0 ;try �,, - .,r i • tt / l a I . j L' I, t' , I III.- --. .1-':.— l _.?4''S 5 ,l }'. , t '`, � )xa�ra � I / • : t �c'. ,r i ,� a.,: � . K-'-� 1 !wit _� l." � �,� .' .,f...!,...,...:t.,..,;,,,,,i ' '' i', r'-",• •— ••'...------'44- .-•-'•••-• l''• -'" - --4tZ''-'-'''''''--•,',81110. . ,• - ' XI .'. -''. -• ' ., Int\ ',1, ''',1'•; • i 1 ' • • ''•• ''''f,•''' '..kV.' • i / A ��tgt' tl i .:,,,...,4..,,.„,,,,,,,,,,J:, ,: ,,,./ ,T r -•, \• ii' •17-i.R.,' ?te rat, _. . - �i e.iw''t. .r rf ,. �. ... , �. - �' ``; i : ^ r A • �,' as`4i d 21 i.. f, . 4 w d t ,•F, 4 r � ii i I,�A fi A k k .�`''` s i #1 r:F y .ti,�_ e' 'fit .. tee . i 210 I. ` :ti a'S• \�1 / .1,;-,...".:7,:; :142:4,. Ti'�`'Py� aV R "Xs Z. a Ca ti fi 1 (-,..1'.-3'` sTi i ,„"0.;,s1"J y,� '" 4f ii t4ja�7Y � r' ''''y , V;� Ri t��4 �y' •' d _. i F Jy t '®e 3 art` f:( F N'� � Y� � �. ,],yiE q '� qy € 4. ATMut # 17 '' f �. t'E \ `1 Vr R f E `1� CI # ill 1 • 1 wa�.w L�.jMr�+ri:,r i iM4.y iq,�l e•Miri kJ ' - , ,. , . .. .. ..., _ ....... a,;;;:::: : .„ii , ` . I,, 1 4,„i ;‘, '4: t 1 - .,-: - I/h'! ' - = - S if ‘ ,i.)J ,. �_ , ,Q t Yt +f^a t7 i' 4; Y J �14t tfX I 41, : t • 4. • "t \ a. ri. YS`` l `:L >, a , .r `` - 4 +a. ,rty r, Nal is ; ' . 1 eA 5 , it • : , ".:4':":;41.01",:§VriftY"---Y.:'',::::::, :,. ,:::-,, ifott„: ;';.•::'0:, ::::144,,,k1/47,,1411:..s.z �� �r�7£ �f �S J p ��> 888 4(t i .. b , ' 4V'' 9 ga=d"ld; s�ti � ,Rp"��, "i i t } E °* 3 �q ., 41 `�' Yti E 4,....:`,f...,,,,„., ati +s c�'1��I��Q��n�l '�i�i •�S�tr 4tr�,li ' ,J _ �� { � '' R $ t� t3',''''''..'.--,.,',';',7<",i,,--',.'.4,;i.''''.. , t3° �, \ Y \ fi ryM 10;A::'-',`,44.- ' defR a.r a�Jf's �ry• �5`,��' `": i �"e%S g`y.^ "..'-',1,e'".•'- q , fit* a 4i. V � �^,r ' �g�y,S �� rya t.��yw� l \ r.�t9.O�ti• ` � .. 3Y.f6 ;e�±,Ai_.;Jua- ....':: ... ski Al ri.rt, ",-1.41...'":' f,ty ` 1 !d '.a _ rr 4,° ,{.t..• P°.� afi.,47'' ®may® _{' ii-72L -'t - Y:.' .£-'a 'wry, -w . s L I��s. -.� r I • - 41 `i 4 1 r -: �_ T mY . t'..' - } €.z •.dr - i t'-''• �'" �",�1M,. 4 / bl f 'd: Fy�/4tG ..,,, �,.,�� y iis. yy� C4 ' r"-.'"'• ly m3 *Y .ti _ _ g ( i .r. .. ` fir ..c .d ��a"5 � ,3m( • ripe an address o:a property ID ICD) Search help. Property , ... . .;,•• -..---, -. 1 . / .: . Go to Property links ------- „.' . Clear results FID:1711723430032 & 3593 Crystal PI ' t Orono,MN 55391 1 OvmerfTaxpayer 1 i Owner Veniamin Bochamlkov Et Al •4tILI...° VENIAMIN BOCHARNIKOV , -2.- ;OLENA.BOCI-IARNIKOV ty Taxpayer. .3593 CRYSTAL Pr_ ...— WAYZATA MN 55391 . _... __________,..... . Tax Parcel : Parcel Area017 acres- Tartans/Abstract Abstract - I - F 1" ' . kit- •- 't11;..-•.'i.,'J L ,, Addition: Navarre Heights i. . . _.._. ,,. ,-,-,. Lot: 011 : ., . . ---.. I i; •-.. ' Block: 003 .. . .. , Metes&BotindS: n • I • . Tax Oala(A,,,ersed 2018 Payable 21219) IT5 a, Market Value: 5158,000 Total Tax: $1400.96 , rt...... • ...! Property Type: Residential , . 't 1 _ t ... Homestead: Homestead --- . - 1 ti __ Year Built 1900 7:: 1"1'N'---------1...... I . .. L. ........ V, - . 1 • t., 1 Tax Data(Assessed 2019,Payable 2020) A.' '-*" Market Value Unavailable "'""'" NSubject ., „... „. ... . 4.4.1-....) Property Type Unavailable r'-'451VPH 1 •,, 1 ___- 1 !_...„..,,,, Homestead: Unavailable . 1 , "..... ,...,, ..., ' I I I I Go to...+ ___ ______ L. r 1.- , ,,-, to, -", pi .4. — 05 i .,,- 41110 i I t C s 1 Imo . R , ,, I t �3 i armilig } • I Pr , , 1-,x. . _ . , i • .fir. x i e , . "'"'''‘,. ' L r s r S` I ■ ,a?'e' �: L*f mob . •E 'y C F r $i t. te i .` `gg�, Facing West 'TM w d . q .e _ � � � ' k. ,k,.t.;,,..i..! k_ 4 ` . .. /� � ,, 1 'sem, . c�•fi 1 �'7 pari ,� e►vi 42'`'Y.:.. f, . o t , Facing North P ' - ,4" y ' .. :90 Ivrr .e4ai:+ ~; Y,° t` a �, ' WysM s :Ail / ill -f , 4;,, ,4,,,,,, ,iypr .„ ,,,:t„ .„ „4,fiikl `f,"Pr �'�' e� ' ¢ y"e y. t *'vi ,WAM ' r' i "' °*y t }g r"��,� , xSt VNA _* a J te '' '1'‘:' ,,.' 4P4r / VA!. ..' .....4.1 ; . .1 lia:- .- - + r reF q jam 9# & K _s y)4 C _ , • Facing East From: Adam Edwards To: Melanie Curtis Subject: RE:Variance Grading Review-LA19-000020/3593 Crystal PI Date: Friday,March 22,2019 3:01:09 PM Some comments: Proposed driveway is only—1ft from property line. Applicant will need to make sure that no additional surface runoff is directed to the neighboring properties nor onto the roadway. Applicant may want to consider moving driveway away from the property line. At its current location there is no room for a turn radius at the connection with the road on the west side.Turning into and out of an 8 foot wide driveway without turn radii may prove difficult. Adam From: Melanie Curtis Sent:Thursday, March 21, 2019 3:53 PM To:Adam Edwards<aedwards@ci.orono.mn.us> Subject:Variance Grading Review- LA19-000020/3593 Crystal PI Adam Please review the attached plan to construct additions to the existing home within the side setback. They're also proposing a variance to the front setback but over existing... I'm looking for comments from you by or before March 27th if possible; this will go to PC on April 15th You'll get another opportunity to review at the Building Permit. Thank you. imbem..7 Melanie Curtis, Planner Direct 952.249.4627 Planning &Zoning Office 952.249.4620 2750 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 Email: mcurtis@ci.orono.mn.us Website: www.ci.orono.mn.us All permitting is now done through our new online portal - LINK. RUN DATE:03/06/2019 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:1 38 17-117-23 31 0033 38 17-117-23 34 0025 38 17-117-23 34 0036 DAVID MADGETT&K SCHWARZE PAUL HANSEN&REYA HANSEN GERALD LEE SIMONSON 3637 TOGO RD 2285 BLAINE AVE 3640 LYRIC AVE ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 DAVID MADGETT PAUL HANSEN&REYA HANSEN GERALD LEE SIMONSON KRISTIN SCHWARZE 2285 BLAINE AVE 3640 LYRIC AVE 1350 ORONO OAKS DR WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 ORONO MN 55356-9480 38 17-117-23 310036 38 17-117-23 34 0026 38 17-117-23 34 0037 NAVARRE CONG OF JEHOVAH WITN MARIE J INGBRETSON JOSEPH J ARONE 3655 TOGO RD 3600 LIVINGSTON AVE 3697 LYRIC AVE ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 NAVARRE CONG OF JEHOVAH WITN MARIE J INGBRETSON JOSEPH J ARONE C/O KINGDOM HALL 3600 LIVINGSTON AVE 3697 LYRIC AVE 3655 TOGO RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 31 0053 38 17-117-23 34 0027 38 17-117-23 34 0038 TERRA DEVELOPMENT LLC CHAD JOHNSON/KATHLEEN WHALEN ROBERT TURKOWSKI 38 ADDRESS PENDING 3630 LIVINGSTON AVE 3695 LYRIC AVE ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 TERRA DEVELOPMENT LLC CHAD D JOHNSON ROBERT TURKOWSKI 227 SUNNYRIDGE LA KATHLEEN E WHALEN 3695 LYRIC AVE GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 3630 LIVINGSTON AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 34 0011 38 17-117-2334 0028 38 17-117-23 34 0039 VIL OF ORONO PETER DUNLAP KATHERINE M AHRENS 2345 BLAINE AVE 3640 LIVINGSTON AVE 3685 LYRIC AVE ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 CITY OF ORONO PETER DUNLAP KATHERINE M AHRENS PO BOX 66 695 COUNTY RD 19 3685 LYRIC AVE CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 MINNETRISTA MN 55364 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 34 0012 38 17-117-23 34 0029 38 17-117-23 34 0040 R H&N M HARDING Y GALIMOVA&R GALIMOV DOUGLAS J NIELAND 2389 BLAINE AVE 3650 LIVINGSTON AVE 3675 LYRIC AVE ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ROBERT H HARDING YULIYA GALIMOVA DOUGLAS J NIELAND 2391 BLAINE AVE RUSTEM GALIMOV 3675 LYRIC AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 3650 LIVINGSTONE AVE ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 38 17-117-23 34 0013 38 17-117-23 34 0030 38 17-117-23 34 0048 CHRISTOPHER CHILDRESS STEFANIE HOFMAN CITY OF ORONO 3630 NORTHERN AVE 3660 LIVINGSTON AVE 2301 BLAINE AVE ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 CHRISTOPHER CHILDRESS STEFANIE PAULA HOFMAN CITY OF ORONO 3630 NORTHERN AVE 422 WABASHA ST PO BOX 66 WAYZATA MN 55391 ST PETER MN 56082 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 17-117-23 34 0017 38 17-117-23 34 0031 38 17-117-23 34 0052 SCOTT W GARDNER M M LARSON&D A LARSON HENNEPIN CO REGIONAL RR AUTH 3640 NORTHERN AVE 3670 LIVINGSTON AVE 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 00000 SCOTT W GARDNER MICHAEL M&DEBRA ANN LARSON HENNEPIN COUNTY 3640 NORTHERN AVE 3670 LIVINGSTON AVE REGIONAL RAILROAD AUTHORITY WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 701 4TH AVE S SUITE 400 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55415 38 17-117-23 34 0018 38 17-117-23 34 0033 38 17-117-23 34 0093 AMBER A HOECHST JENNA WOLFF TERRA DEVELOPMENT LLC 3670 NORTHERN AVE 3692 LYRIC AVE 38 ADDRESS PENDING ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 00000 AMBER A HOECHST JENNA WOLFF TERRA DEVELOPMENT LLC 3670 NORTHERN AVE 3692 LYRIC AVE 227 SUNNYRIDGE LA WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55422 38 17-117-2334 0023 38 17-117-23 34 0034 38 17-117-23 34 0094 RICHARD E QUNELL DAVID W LAGIESKI ARTCRAFT HOMES INC 2255 BLAINE AVE 3690 LYRIC AVE 38 ADDRESS PENDING ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 00000 RICHARD E QUNELL DAVID W LAGIESKI ARTCRAFT HOMES INC 2255 BLAINE AVE 1039 WEBSTER ST 3581 WILDS RIDGE NW WAYZATA MN 55391 TRAVERSE CITY Ml 49686 PRIOR LAKE MN 55372 38 17-117-23 34 0024 38 17-117-23 34 0035 38 17-117-23 42 0021 BRYAN D SINKEL L E TOLEDO&C A TOLEDO THOMAS L&LEIGH A SNYDER 2265 BLAINE AVE 3650 LYRIC AVE 3601 TOGO RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 BRYAN D SINKEL LLOYD&CAROLYN TOLEDO THOMAS L&LEIGH A SNYDER 2265 BLAINE AVE 925 NEWMAN DR 3601 TOGO RD WAYZATA MN 55391 S SAN FRAN CA 94080 WAYZATA MN 55391 RUN DATE:03/06/2019 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:2 38 17-117-23 42 0022 38 17-117-23 43 0042 38 17-117-23 43 0055 JACQUELYN A ROBERTSON MARK A SPALDING DAWN M STILINOVICH 2171 SHADYWOOD RD 3508 LIVINGSTON AVE 3554 LYRIC AVE ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 JACQUELYN A ROBERTSON MARK A SPALDING DAWN M STILINOVICH 2171 SHADYWOOD RD 26087 ISLAND RD 3554 LYRIC AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 CLEVELAND MN 56017 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 43 0026 38 17-117-23 43 0043 38 17-117-23 43 0056 PAUL RILEY ANDERSEN DEREK G HAGENESS KEVIN GRADY 3525 CRYSTAL PL 3505 LIVINGSTON AVE 3536 LYRIC AVE ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 PAUL RILEY ANDERSEN DEREK G HAGENESS KEVIN GRADY 3533 CRYSTAL PLACE 3505 LIVINGSTON AVE 760 APPLEGARDEN RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 MOUND MN 55364 38 17-117-23 43 0027 38 17-117-23 43 0044 38 17-117-23 43 0057 PAUL R ANDERSEN DUSTIN J MICHEL JACOB M/EMILY LOURICAS 3533 CRYSTAL PL 3525 LIVINGSTON AVE 3520 LYRIC AVE ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 PAUL R ANDERSEN DUSTIN J MICHEL JACOB M/EMILY LOURICAS 3533 CRYSTAL PL 3525 LIVINGSTON AVE 3520 LYRIC AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 43 0028 38 17-117-23 43 0045 38 17-117-23 43 0105 JOSHUA B MOORE&TINA MOORE EMILY R GOETZ THOMAS D WEBER TRUSTEE 3555 CRYSTAL PL 3533 LIVINGSTON AVE 3559 LYRIC AVE ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 JOSHUA B MOORE&TINA MOORE EMILY R GOETZ THOMAS D WEBER TRUSTEE 3555 CRYSTAL PL 3533 LIVINGSTON AVE 3559 LYRIC AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 43 0032 38 17-117-23 43 0046 38 17-117-23 43 0106 VENIAMIN BOCHARNIKOV ET AL C J BEARD&E A BEARD THOMAS A HAUGAN 3593 CRYSTAL PL 3541 LIVINGSTON AVE 3585 LYRIC AVE ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 VENIAMIN BOCHARNIKOV CHRISTOPHER J BEARD THOMAS A HAUGAN OLENA BOCHARNIKOV EMILY A BEARD 3585 LYRIC AVE 3593 CRYSTAL PL 3541 LIVINGSTON AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 43 0033 38 17-117-23 43 0047 38 17-117-23 43 0107 HERSEL H FORESTER DAVID PELKA/CHRISTINA PELKA A PLUS PROPERTIES LLC 3599 CRYSTAL PL 3551 LIVINGSTON AVE 3596 SHORELINE DR ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 HERSEL FORESTER DAVID PELKA/CHRISTINA PELKA A PLUS PROPERTIES LLC 3599 CRYSTAL PLACE WAY 3551 LIVINGSTON AVE 3596 SHORELINE DR WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 43 0034 38 17-117-23 43 0048 38 17-117-23 43 0132 MATTHEW BOLLIS M K WARREN/TESSA L HARTMANN MARK PATRICK MALONEY II 3596 LIVINGSTON AVE 3559 LIVINGSTON AVE 2213 SHADYWOOD RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 MATTHEW BOLLIS MATTHEW K WARREN MARK PATRICK MALONEY II 3596 LIVINGSTON AVE TESSA L HARTMANN 2213 SHADYWOOD RD WAYZATA MN 55391 3559 LIVINGSTON AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 43 0035 38 17-117-23 43 0049 38 17-117-23 43 0133 BETTY BEGIN JASON NOLEN ANDREW D SPILSETH 3580 LIVINGSTON AVE 3577 LIVINGSTON AVE 2205 SHADYWOOD RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 BETTY BEGIN JASON NOLEN ANDREW D SPILSETH 3580 LIVINGSTON AVE 3577 LIVINGSTON AVE 326 RIDGEVIEW DR WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 43 0040 38 17-117-23 43 0050 38 17-117-23 43 0134 C D&N LONG D CHAKHVASHVILI/J M MARTINEZ COLLIN F REESE 3556 LIVINGSTON AVE 3585 LIVINGSTON AVE 2199 SHADYWOOD RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 CHRISTIAN D&NANCY LONG DACHI CHAKHVASHVILI COLLIN F REESE 3556 LIVINGSTON AVE JOHANNA MAE MARTINEZ 2199 SHADYWOOD RD WAYZATA MN 55391 3585 LIVINGSTON AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 43 0041 38 17-117-23 43 0051 38 17-117-23 43 0135 ROBERT EUGENE EBERT JOSEPH HOUGHTON JOHN H ANDERSON 3520 LIVINGSTON AVE 3599 LIVINGSTON AVE 2195 SHADYWOOD RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ROBERT E EBERT JOSEPH HOUGHTON ALEXANDER C DUSSAUT 3520 LIVINGSTON AVE 500 FARHILL RD MARIE DUSSAUT WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 2195 SHADYWOOD RD WAYZATA MN 55391 RUN DATE:03/06/2019 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:3 38 17-117-23 43 0136 K M HEINS&M D HEINS 2177 SHADYWOOD RD ORONO MN 55391 KENT M&MICHELLE D HEINS 2177 SHADYWOOD RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 43 0137 KATHRYN L FRICKSTAD 2189 SHADYWOOD RD ORONO MN 55391 KATHRYN L FRICKSTAD 2189 SHADYWOOD RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 43 0138 IAN SMALL&SARAH LITTLEFAIR 3590 NORTHERN AVE ORONO MN 55391 IAN SMALL&SARAH LITTLEFAIR 3590 NORTHERN AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 43 0140 C S WALQUIST&M L WALQUIST 3505 CRYSTAL PL ORONO MN 55391 CRAIG S&MARIA LEA WALQUIST 3505 CRYSTAL PL WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 43 0143 GEORGIA J SPAULDING 2227 SHADYWOOD RD ORONO MN 55391 GEORGIA J SPAULDING PO BOX 31 SPRING PARK MN 55384 38 17-117-23 43 0144 PA&SRDONELAN 2229 SHADYWOOD RD ORONO MN 55391 PATRICK A DONELAN SARAH R DONELAN 2229 SHADYWOOD RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 43 0145 EVELYN J LANGE 3585 CRYSTAL PL ORONO MN 55391 EVELYN J LANGE 3585 CRYSTAL PL WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 43 0148 B E BIERMANN&L M CABALLERO 3554 LIVINGSTON AVE ORONO MN 55391 BRENT E BIERMANN LYNETTE MARIE CABALLERO 3554 LIVINGSTON AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 43 0150 CHERYL KELLEY 3572 LIVINGSTON AVE ORONO MN 55391 CHERYL KELLEY 3685 NORTH SHORE DR WAYZATA MN 55391 38 17-117-23 43 0153 CHERYL KELLEY 3596 LYRIC AVE ORONO MN 55391 CHERYL KELLEY 3596 LYRIC AVE WAYZATA MN 55391 Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases.Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available.The viewer should understand,however,that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties,either express or implied,or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. Hennepin Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Date: 3/6/2019 r ,:5!'' ''''' 4..47 ._`-.;•.• •IfR'•vac, _w ,:;:...s 2142 i.. '2166 Ifror , '2172 m (s0 360.1 2178 685 3645 t�3 „. '2184'' 2190 cel 11 2200 1l) •655�Y -- 4 , 694 % ' 3675 oz _j 2208, :: [1 221 5 166. 1:4., iurt 22 / 1 e ''`' `19g €' 2205 'm 2 DP 3 660 ‘'° 229 (t61 � �ti rtr, '�� f33y 3670 ; 213 tai I.I 223227 menimmillineimmilmigni_..,, , rii m 2255 r Iii 22uli ¢, 3585 3555053493 _� i1 t 2285 �. Itiiis 1800 35 3572 ;55 4 3555 + 3:508 3466 tar 00 010 Nn: r40 i (134) 3697 .- 6gZ 7.'°6 '' coElallA ; „rf t4 00 0100 3 598 r 3559 r t 3 525 4, ;3495 ;G$ 0. 3650 (311 .. : el 1 ; ' tiz 3 675 m Op 445 0,11 r e 508 ,.. 3496 513665(x11 640 3596 3554 3536 1 sea QIl 348 4 I'k !3500. ' 3655( . r I I3505, 1585 3559 1551 3525 '35133' 3645 3 499 (00 (s00 0000000 raq go 147Y 3625 3615 3541 '3635 (� 2369(tet 9596 nV5.1 ., &.- to +xi (I1 3502 ~ WI 3574 1 3572. 3542. MA ?: 3 496 02 Buffer Size: 500 0 50 100 200 Feet Map Comments: 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3593 Crystal Place This data (i) is furnished 'AS IS with no representation as to completeness or accuracy;(i)is furnished with no warranty of any kind, and (ii) is notsuitable for legal,engineering or surveying purposes.Hennepin County shal not be liable for any damage,injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information,contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South,Minneapolis,MN 55487/g is.info@hennepn.us Date Application Received: 03/15/19 *kEsH0,-(G° Date Application Considered as Complete:03/15/19 60-Day Review Period Expires: 05/14/19 111L- To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members �`Dustin Rief, City Administrator From: Melanie Curtis, Planner i'Y1GG Date: 15 April 2019 Subject: #LA19-000021, Ben and Katrina Wasscher,4775 North Shore Drive, Variances Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting a rear (street) yard setback variance to permit an addition to the existing home. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval contingent upon an encroachment agreement,see page 4. Background The applicant is requesting a variance from the rear(street)yard setback to construct a small addition to the existing home 22.3 feet from the North Shore Drive property line where a 30- foot setback is required, on the west side of the home. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-330&78-1279-Setbacks: LR-1B Required Existing Proposed Rear/Street 30' 21.3' Addition 22.3' East Side 10' 42' No Change West Side 10' 18.3' Addition 10' Lakeshore 75' House 98' Addition 105' Deck 86' Average Lakeshore The addition will conform to the average lakeshore setback. Section 78-330-Lot Area/Width: LR-1B Lot Area Lot Width Required 43,560 s.f. (1.0 acres) 140' Actual 19,250 s.f. (0.44 acre) ±129'@ 75'/±107' @ OHWL Section 78-1403-Structural Building Coverage: Total Lot Area Total Structural Coverage 19,250 s.f. (0.44 acre) Allowed: 3,850 s.f. (20%) Existing: 1,765 s.f. (9%) Proposed: 1,986 s.f. (10.3%) FILE#LA19-000021 15 April 2019 Page 2 of 4 Section 78-1680 and 78-1700-Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Overlay Total Area Allowed Existing Hardcover Proposed Hardcover District Tier in Zone Hardcover Tier 1 19,250 s.f. 4,812 s.f. 4,358 s.f.* 113 s.f. 4,627 s.f.* 113 s.f. (25%) (22.6%) w/in 75' (24%) w/in 75' *Staff adjusted the submitted HC totals based on "exclusion"of retaining walls per code. Applicable Regulations: Rear Yard Setback Variance (Section 78-330) Due to the extreme topography and bluff on the lake side of the property,the home is located nearer to the rear street lot line than is permitted.The applicants are proposing a small 269 square foot addition which conforms to all codes except for the rear(street)yard setback requirement of 30 feet.At 22.3 feet the applicant is attempting to keep the rear yard encroachment less than the existing home which is set back 21.3 feet. Governing Regulation:Variance(Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.537 Subd. 6(2)variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The rear yard setback variance is consistent with the general intent of the Ordinance. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan.The variance for an addition to a residence in a residential zone is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The request to permit construction of an addition within the rear yard setback appears to be reasonable as the owners of the adjacent properties have stated that they are not adversely impacted; the mature vegetation and topography separate the subject property from the County road. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The sub-standard setback and size of the Property was not the result of actions by the landowner. The home is set within the rear yard setback as a result of FILE#LA19-000021 15 April 2019 Page 3 of 4 the topography, the bluff setback, and vehicle access resulting in the substandard rear yard setback of the home;and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The rear yard setback variance will not alter the character of the neighborhood.The home is situated at a lower elevation than the road; it does not appear that the requested setback variance to permit the addition will be visible from North Shore Drive, impact drainage, or adversely impact the adjacent property owners. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn.Stat. §216C.06,subd. 2,when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78.This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.This condition is not applicable,as the residential home is an allowed use in the LR-1B District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling.This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. The nonconforming lot area and substandard lot width of the property is not uncommon in the surrounding neighborhood, nor is the bluff topography. The setback into the required rear yard is not out of character with the immediate neighborhood. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located.The majority of the homes along this shoreline are set back closer to North Shore Drive based on the topography and are generally in line with each other. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Granting the rear yard setback variance is necessary for the preservation of the property right of the applicant. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the requested rear yard setback variance in this unique situation is not contrary to the intent of the zoning chapter. 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The depth of the Property, the topography, and location of the existing home create practical difficulties affecting the Property;the variance is necessary and does not merely serve as a convenience to the owners. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Practical Difficulties Statement FILE#LA19-000021 15 April 2019 Page 4 of 4 Applicant has provided supporting documentation regarding the applicable Practical Difficulties attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Practical Difficulties Analysis Staff finds practical difficulties supporting the variance for the addition based on the topography of the lot and the location of the existing home. Engineer Comments The City Engineer's comments are attached as Exhibit F. Public Comments The neighbors on either side have submitted comments regarding the proposal which are attached as Exhibit G. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval. The applicant should be required to demonstrate the relocation of the AC pad will be in a conforming location. Staff recommends the City require an encroachment agreement to address the applicant's existing retaining walls which encroach on to the adjacent City property to the west. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Form Exhibit C. Existing& Proposed Survey/Site Plan Exhibit D. Proposed Plans and Elevations Exhibit E. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit F. City Engineer Memo Exhibit G. Neighbor Comments Exhibit H. Aerial Photos Exhibit I. Property Owners List Exhibit J. Plat Map Land Use Application Summary Application Date: 03/15/2019 Address: 4775 NORTH SHORE DR MOUND, MN 55364 Parcel Number: 0711723320022 Land Use Number: LA19-000021 Application Submitted By: Property Owner Owner: Name: BEN A WASSCHER TRUST KATRINA WASSCHER TRUST Address: 4775 NORTH SHORE DR MOUND, MN 55364 Applicant: Name: Katrina Wasscher Company: Address: 4775 N Shore Dr Orono, MN 55364 kwasscher@gmail.com Contact Information• Associated Contact: bob boyer bobb@boyerbuilding.com Associated Contact: BEN A WASSCHER TRUST KATRINA WASSCHER TRUST Associated Contact: Katrina Wasscher kwasscher@gmail.com Associated Contact: Project Description: Home addition Land Use Application Type: Amendmend Application Appeal of Admin Decision ._ Concept Application C? Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Application wi Subdivision Application L. Subdivision Exception Vacation Application Li Variance Application Applicant Signature: (.) 3.15.2019 Application for a Variance on the property owned by Ben and Katrina Wasscher 4775 North Shore Drive Legal description: Lots 8 and 9 and %z of Lot 7 adjacent to Lot 8, Block 6, Berquist & Wicklund's Park, Hennepin County, MN Project narrative. The property is located on the shores of lake Minnetonka.The existing home was built by a previous owner with a rear yard variance. Approved by the city to protect the bluff line. The Current owners wish to add a small master bath addition on the north end of the house. The addition would be 270 ft2, and designed to respect the 10ft side yard set back and the bluff line set back as illustrated on the survey dated 3/11/19. We are asking for a variance on the back side of the lot.The variance would allow the structure to be 22.3 ft off the rear yard lot line.This is 12" less than the variance requested for the original house. No other variances are required. Note the survey includes Hardcover calculation, required bluff line and side yard setbacks. We have also attached working drawings illustrating how the addition will neatly integrate to the existing home. The exterior finish materials (siding, roofing,trims,will match the existing house as well as possible. Neighbor comments. See attached, The addition will not extend to the south or the lake side of the house.The neighbors will not be able to see the addition from their home. Land on other side is owned by city. Grading and erosion control The addition will include a full height lower level with a window to the lake side.The total addition will require approximately 150 yards of soil to be removed from the site. Some returned to backfill. Soil will not be piled on the site because of lack of room. Some of the upper level retaining walls will need to be relocated to allow adequate drainage around the side of the building. One tree will need to be removed because it will be too close to the addition. Owner will be restoring the site as it now is, wood chips and native vegetation. Silt fencing will be place conjunction with MCWD recommendations. Hardcover Calculations .See attached Hardcover Packet attached. Filled out using the form provided Legal description in Word form (above). Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) approval or documentation After discussing the project with you and reviewing the attached survey it has been determined that this project would not require a permit from the MCWD has the amount of disturbance is below the amount that would require an erosion control permit,the proposed work is outside of the 100 year floodplain for Minnetonka, and there are no wetlands on site. If you have any questions feel free to contact me. Thank you, Will Roach Permitting Assistant Minnehaha Creek Watershed District 15320 Minnetonka Blvd, Minnetonka, MN 55345 Direct: 952-641-4580 MINNEHAHA CREEK WA1'E25HED DISTRICT Building plans and elevations (to-scale) See attached Practical Difficulties Documentation completed in application. The home owners wish to remain in the home for the duration and understand to do that they will need a bath on the main level that is fully accessible.The home presently has one small bath with a tub on the main level,this bath services guests and a second bedroom. The bath is too small to meet their future needs. The home is quite small and there is no practical way to add the bath into the existing envelope. There is no other area of the house that would provide the privacy and the minimal site impact. Survey, meeting the attached requirements. Including bluff analysis. See attached Survey showing bluff line set back relative to the addition. Tree preservation plan (location, type and size of all trees 6' in diameter or larger), within the 75- foot setback; bluff and bluff impact zone. We will be removing one significant tree inside the bluff line set back zone,the tree is approximately 13" DBH,the roots will be severely damage when excavation and feel it would make sense to remove and replace. The site is heavily wooded, after excavation and reinstallation of the retaining walls,The site will be seeded using annual rye grass and wood chips.The goal would be to restore the area immediately around the addition and on the bluff setback to native vegetation and trees. Some dense rooting perennials Hosta Etc. will be planted within the retaining walls to control runoff,Silt fencing will remain in place well after the native vegetation has reseeded the site in the summer. END PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM LA19-000021 1.The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter. Response:The property is located on the shores of lake Minnetonka.The existing home was built by a previous owner with a rear yard variance.Approved by the city to protect the bluff line. The Current owners wish to add a small master bath addition on the north end of the house.The addition would be 270 ft2,and designed to respect the 10ft side yard set back and the bluff line set back as illustrated on the survey dated 3/11/19. We are asking for a variance on the back side of the lot.The variance would allow the structure to be 22.3 ft off the rear yard lot line.This is 12?less than the variance requested for the original house. No other variances are required. Note the survey includes Hardcover calculation, required bluff line and side yard setbacks. We have also attached working drawings illustrating how the addition will neatly integrate to the existing home.The exterior finish materials (siding, roofing,trims,will match the existing house as well as possible. 2.The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. Response:Yes.The house was closer to the property line than setback rules allow when we bought it. 3.The variance,if granted,will not alter the essential character of the locality. Response: Correct.The addition will blend in with the existing house and won't significantly change the look from either the road,the neighbor's property, or the lake. 4.Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. Response: N/A 5. Practical difficulties include,but are not limited to,inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems.Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes,Section 1163.06,Subd.2,when in harmony with this Chapter. Response:The home owners wish to remain in the home for the duration and understand to do that they will need a bath on the main level that is fully accessible.The home presently has one small bath with a tub on the main level,which services guests and a second bedroom.The bath is too small to meet their future needs.The home is quite small and there is no practical way to add the bath into the existing envelope. There is no other area of the house that would provide the privacy and the minimal site impact. 6.The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. Response: N/A 7.The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. Response: N/A 8.The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. Response: Correct. 9.The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. Response: Correct. 10.The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Response:Correct. 11.The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health,safety,comfort,morals,or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. Response: Correct 12.The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant,but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. Response: Correct. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY PROPERTY ADDRESS:4775 North Shore Drive ORONO, MN FOR: KATRINA WASSCHER • DENOTES IRON MONUMENT FOUND ^ O DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET /f\ \ N. \ z1071.2 DENOTES EJCONCOS1INO ELEVATION.T f \, I'-•: .•;I DENOTES CONCRETE / DENOTES BITUMINOUS ( IN FEET ) :\. / /fir �:.\ \ ® DENOTES WELL ® DENOTES GUARD POST 1 inch = 2Oft xQ959 � \ • ID 7� \ DENOTES ELECTRIC METER/BOX METER/BOX 02 © DENOTES GAS METER/BOX BASS15X2� 1 1 DENOTES AIRCONDITIONING UNIT ............7 N ''0, DENOTES UTILITY POLE BASSOS DENOTES EXISTING CONTOUR ..99R ., \ 0 ^^-DENOTES OVERHEAD WIRE BASS 13 t0.. \ %. 992. `,I .. .., ....gg�• • \ �O \ '' BAss o d ' - o ti '96'6' 9B DAK13 x993.4 � �Q .'.93 ��\ O N X 984.2 ` B 06,. d' ELM12 a 6�, 4 s N f� 4: ...... S/ �/� ...........989.8 �' • \ 990 4 i... \ a 8 5978.6•., 9 jilt ,.e J4 A. y 1 . ` \ eA 98 K4•��.• 0' �, /7' 987.1 \ / \ ^ • 9dt, 78 OAK1fi^IIO� ,, • �� sig, ''6.7 '�,A �''+, 100 5O 9&3.3 I / a /4,.. � \ O ••� Ott. t'\ DAK7210Go:& �N. C�`♦ N J 4� ' 978:4...•,•\ ` `(•.' i � \ 1000.7 '':924.4 f.!S.978.5 978 5't.•,..4981. rye,4.75i 0 OAK, 001 8 \ ••.w \\.0.\•4.78.4 �a9787\481.7� 987.34 987.40p, �! //� 9919 l \ 'p\ \\ ^. '..',"�" ' W 89.8 ...;0/,\ \\\ \\\ z' ,B OAK30 ....5 !\PdNA> �, ae • x98] �,�oJ. ./� : ra 9'X6.4.\ % \ \<1 a •q„' t., 6., a 987.4 ®ye, ©,... ,_S.\ .\ ® ,170..,.-- 979.5. d• ®yP ti se/ WELL'\4989: °,1,;',..° ' •�j ,••��.+1, \.. '' \ ;�, O- 4 �� ,y4. Iy e \9eea 't'° Q � Toot., \' .4 975 �yT Fp \ J`' 967:4;•: 5 '4\F ;T 979.1 44 Al 4,. /7Y l9 1. \ \ ,b• L �, a 4 \, 987: 887.3 987" 2 S • '': �)O 979.1 ?t 9' •79. 'D� � .. d'y 998•!* 4 'O .e •87.7 .95&1'D, ' ti.96".r8'• \ y�M•\; '(4,<II 979.1 8-986.3 986.8♦N 40), �' ( s 7 ♦ / 5\ \\� ♦♦y \ y O / 980 8•\ \ T kEU- • •.\� \ /988 2� 9878 �::� 144 % ....:T ~ 976 ' \ >.,‘ a\- ,♦ `Y 9a• .. I \ \\ 981 x•"'1 �/ \ \ " - \ '•, x963,2 '�\ 9]8.2'� ♦ \ INGRESS AND / \\` \..' .I O✓ / \ �B x76.4\'n 92\,��oAK2o EGRESS \``'. EGRESS PER `'.. g Y. ''.. `, `'•., '' sfis.:'.. •O ENT P DOC. NO. . '..\. '... '..'�.• '.,97.7.7 x. a�OAK2� '• `. %. ♦-r s7s.6.. ,.� 3564 '+ i. '.�•., :. .,/., 450 _936:2. Rj. 946•}... OAK74 9'7.7.8 .978.C'3a '.../ 985.6 x /''' �q OAK30 885.5 988.7 : : P ,i. /+ '949.�.._. ,,'•••••'•.,,• pie % // .\� '. X90.7 k• -q,--:".N. .i' { A �"�`"•.. \ 984.6 985.7 -. /. ,.; 1• '+ / '. 7 0AK72. ♦ - 97".SK B '+. ;� 987.2 (( MAPLEII ��' � •'+. �,�9g \ i 9647 ./.\`. �, /� 986.7 '\C '88t 4 9643 H85.2.. 4 ••.CINKGQII . ••..,� �t 1g• 982 .P '/. '!.4. ,•,'• - `x000:slwlis .[� `' 928.7• <v +, \ .. '. '` '977.4, 7 �O'/�.-1,981.2 �.4,�" iC.933':8 .....949.T.`., �.. 96 `!�^• "J Q ': 4y°''., .. ". ..>���)Jp\p�� ''.... .. '•,, .....964:,...... .. .. ....9Y/.4 '.l�/^~ .. 'u '' bc„ \vO,S�y. 3r))8V x 964.8'. •': \ �1"... • EXISTING HOUSE 907.1 GARAGE FLOOR..986.3 % �) '';9c0`9 935 7 '�/��� •. $. Y. \' 4699•\51 6/`... '9•50. 96""..r.99��YS>T..' "%,'' \i' .l.9l78! ti% ^ •... .935' `s m / 11,',V . , a...."'. , ,- '... .. .....Lsy\ 928 • :‘.1%,..), ( • / ."\72 \ %/ 979.5 fs. .932. 7:3 9 38.0 \''.\•°,?:950.8 ...........,._.p.g,eQ/ �1 ' �\ • .\ 9 `dr! 928.7 ., : �,,. iyr..............� ••• • NOTES `•.,`:` NORTH 'a36`z•• '"�'r AREA CALCULATIONS - BEARINGS SHOWN ARE ON ASSUMED DATUM. \•• ' "' TOTAL LOT= ±19,250 a ft. - CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY HOUSE DIMENSIONS, t , '`" q AND SEWER AND BASEMENT DEPTHS Existing House = ±1.717 Sq. Ft. Proposed Addition = ±269 Sq. Ft. - This survey was prepared without the benefit of 928.8 Existing Front Sidewalk = ±247 Sq. Ft. titiework. Easement, appurtenances and encumbrances 42 Existing Bit. Driveway= ±1,763 Sq. Ft. may exist in addition to those shown hereon. This ' Existing Deck - ±378 Sq. Ft. survey is subject to revision upon receipt of a title (Supplied by owner) Exalting Cant - ±10 Sq. Ft. insurance commitment or attorneys title opinion. Existing Shed - ±48 Sq. Ft. (to be removed) - This survey was completed Feb. 12th, 2014, in LEGAL DESCRIPTION Existing Stone Steps - ±82 Sq. Ft. the middle of the Minnesota snow/winter season. Lots 8 and 9 and 1/2 of Lot 7 Ex. Ret. Walls = ±596 Sq. Ft. (±85 sq. ft. to be removed) There may be improvements/features in addition to adjacent to Lot 8, Block 6, Existing Wood Stairs = ±113 Sq. Ft. those shown hereon that were not located due to BERQUIST tL WICKLUND'S PARK, snow/ice cover. Hennepin County, Minnesota. Impervious w/lake st. vac. (±5,090 sq. ft.) = ±26.4% I hereby certify that this plan, survey or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed ACRE LAND SURVEYING- Land Surveyor under the lows of the State of Minnesota. P JOB#15063BS Serving T Metro - .. III // / / area and beyond r 763-238-6278 js.acrelandsurvey®gmail.com JO.HUA P. SCHNEIDER Date: 3-11-19 Reg, No. 44655 to n h N 14 15 Ia P 19 19 110 111 B0 I'3 n4 116 119 117 119 119 Ip C1\Users\Josh\OneDrive\Land Desktop 2008\15063bs-Hergquist 6 WIcklund's Park\dwg\15063bs.dwg 3/11/2019 1118,04 PM CDT PROPERTY ADDRESS:4775 North Shore Drive ORONO,MN FOR: KATRINA WASSCHER --- • DENOTES IRON uaNUMENr FOUND \ m-O DENOTES IRON MONUMENT SET 0 20 \ F--1 DENOTES Emwar•.v Tc eno� I DENOTCONCRETE\ O \ L. _i DENOTES BITUMINOUS 1N FEET) \ ..../ O \\ \ ® DENOTES wa1 I inch=20 ft $ DENOTES GUARD POST 099 0 •p b6 \ E DENOTES ELECTRIC METER/B00 01 \ © DENOTES GAS METER/BOX \ DI DENOTES AIRCONDITIONING UNIT .. DENOTES UTILITY POLE .....,...99 „ \ 0 4. +.DENOTES DOSING CONTOUR DENOTES OVERHEAD WIRE B 9 J \ \ .."...' ''''92 •q ...,.0 ....0g0 N \ Sys 2 ,,[s r� 805510 ` 4,04 2 986 J \\ O^ Q)412 a 6q�' "r�\ I ,�O \ 7 � Sas oSDAs cS \" 9� V Qw \a �� Ja:, 4..>d4" s• . �y Os. 48 .p� a onx a \am.e \ 74* •95e..y,\ a M �: p Vis-?AJC '.:3"...";;..+'30:7;•. , ;'@` '43....1'‘''S'..... ` , ```'c-a ,y\`y�\` 3i R� ,A79.1 y; 93, z`.q�Q`4'''ayg4 11Xs s •°n•eagV ©'�1a� M Nom., �°@ \ ‘.4.. \` Tp a �!�.a. .A. A�BBJ a 9>l 28, 99Bl�.: ...i \/ @ Sm O95. N'` Om A aee 9�1 / 99q W ZZ., % ? 9'60�Sgs / 9y /,. q n \ 9 es�00•S.'`` '4'„'b ii � ? Da.> ♦ �t�\` 5w��T. YR 956 ::',f:%♦♦ 9 `•"ft eSo 1 /2p 9070 8., , \ �0`♦f/B09. �'\ 9803 ex\ o u08pp ,of EGRESS "♦') \ ..900 " ` s, 9 ,pl EASEMENT PER \ .1.0„1. 1 m /)/ > o'h ease i;, 589450 • w' `�. / • J� �p \.. .0-, -, §90. J enz eze] ,. // ma° CZ, Q\" y +m°° T Rs 8]]4 h6h0�^T,9 % .. cf \'''Db 33' Y \ ,4 .3..3''''1'-''' Y'D '.5,n%. Yt� eJs i\../ ai 79.6 `�n o ,„' . '''........ i ez ryFJ`J.9'PA" \ ,�. Sia♦`....., I%4C .939. J]3" .. 9 T9.s , 7i >a 9300 BQ `s`'.. 6- yos‘'9 t,9 950 & g NOTES 9J0AREA CALCULATIONS NORTH BEARING'S SHOWN ARE ON ASSUMED DATUM. "✓ f '3• TOTA LOT=*19,250 sq.ft -CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY HOUSE DIMENSIONS, ". Existing House *1,717 Sq.Ft. SAND SEWER AND BASEMENT DEPTHS. Proposed Addition=±269 Sq.Ft. -This survey was prepared without the benefit of Existing Front Sidewalk=±247 Sq.Ft. titiework.Easement,appurtenances and encumbrances Jp Existing Bit Driveway-±1,763 Sq.Ft may exist in addition to those shown hereon.This § survey is subject to revision upon receipt of a title Existing Deck=±378 Sq.Ft `ante commitment or attorneys title opinion. (Supplied by owner) ExaWng Cant a V40.8 10 Sq.Ft -This survey was completed Feb.12th,2014,In LEGAL DESCRIPTION Exlati"g Shea=349 sq.Ft(to be removed) the middle of the Minnesota snow/winter season. Lots a and 9 and 1/2 of Lot 7 Exisong Stone Steps=162 Sq.Ft There may be improvements/features in addition to adpoeet to Lot 6,Block 6, tA9 Walls=*596 Sq.Ft(385 sq.ft to be removed) i those shown hereon that were not located due to BERWIST Nk VIICKLUND'S PARK, Existing Wood Stairs=0.( Sq.Ft g snow/ice cover. Hennepin County,Minnesota. ImP Nervous"/lake st vac(35.090 sq.ft)_*26.45 I hereby certify that this plan,survey or reportwas prepared by Inc or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed �' Land Surveyor under the laws of the state of Minnesota. ACRE LAND SURVEYING_ JOB#15063BS sear Twin Cities Metro Brea and beyond e P.�-Q_,. 763-238-6278 is.acrelandsuryyr4gmail.com .In HI IA P Si`HNFInFR nedwe 3-11-19 p•9 No "9655 ..88,14ox.8 81.410 FOR `�' g THE WASSCHER 1/��j�Qe�/�'����& 'v°`' it`1''. " m x Plot Plan/Survey REST " �/- / ���'Jta"?5s i 4775 NORTH -IVE : Building Corporation k€ °gEa :,,x.`5009+ �'a '° ORONO. m S x]s"'"'AT. .xx ssan I" &°a XS 113 �� \ s .41 2 n o m I m ' a.; - a I 17 N Si ,-0 5 c 41 C 1'—1 A G •I Q !y rr 4,_q.._—.1 L — / J• L r I 1 \ T Ii CO o z p o=E. o 3T 3 € O 3 x i N rnGN N m Lrn I 1 1 r 1 1 1 ,T i LI L— —1 1 ----- ---, s 1 1 L_J L J 3 4 5 pI 1 PALE MLE, 110”HOME KAM FOR: THE WASSCHER �"WMR!! O Architectural Plan,Floor 0 "' a'"6 ?f'4" N > o x$ RESIDENCE 8: °�51ai 3 4775 NORTH SHORE DRIVE ` ,€'Rg,:" Buildin5Corporation e `O ORONO,MN 55364 m >.¢5 co u.55.34] +'H4 P.o.E,.x.¢.ea¢u7 I noxa. PRONE zow ¢ 11,9"- - 504200 Gs \ I 8 4CLOSET-1NALKIN E BEDROOM#1 111 LOT SET BACK �. `�t� \ :` moassurom \. ol 2666 ` EXISTING HOUSE CONTINUES = IW MASTER BATH NO CHANGES TO REST OF HOUSE W p U d al, `I'5 .' L.3p2 1 N 1 0 : MASTER BEDROOM F. 5:•/L \ 5B/L - --— 104210 sSs 'i0 11,.6.._, iE LL i -- v gu m9 w m / BLUFF SET BACK LOT SET BACK z Y d // / / Existing window // /' to romana0i /// /// Q // // NICK M. / // DATE. 3/1212019 .=1114 0 1st Floor '"3 A 211 V o rlllrlrlllr_ mnm�n��mmmmmrnINIIINI� �rnm J I LICENSE . ExistingWi„d �I L.11 I I L __m """I"" to remV. LJ III Iu a =Wog i UU�� Y 3N�z i- t al 22 S jil���•�d����Oprown. � E Isting winds„ .4.i a.�1 �. � t°remlen ! ' a w REAR ELEVATION DRAWN BY: NICK M. 3/12/2019 1/4,cul 0. SHEET V awe V o, Eil -- . -3:12 - _ z -- _.Ai J_J. II ._ _--_--_-_----=--.:-_--- — --._--,.=--__-:—=—===‘, ir it _HLL 14... - --- ■ I • ■.■1. ■. i ■ rms . ll-11 1 I U ll LI I ll L 1 l LI L1 U LI L1 11 L U L ��•,•��•'� \ LI BC002988 r L Li 1 LI I__ Existing wln W W l TLJ U� �LL�L�1L1� MIMI g 3 [Lit -x° rilliall Irnim".... 1 -Li mmiiiiinnm. ..,o I =u=■■■ Ai Z == MI ■■■NINEMMMM 1= •,��;'I,I;r4ilr.,i.,. _ L moil_■■■ MEMMM� 7 I I��Iin4suhiu�1iyn. N I.::Ill- J ....r . t■��a .L l-. i!11101410110%� '�j any! o Iit :I I i - ■■ :��=�� L:�_ I 4 , r 11 I I I l i1 i 1 T 1J I+i 1 ` I I ( I °' . W LEFT ELEVATION NICK M. 3/12/2019 lie=1'0' SHEET 5. igli li�� __—_ LI m -._ • 1111111111011111111111111MEMNIME ■ - u 1.1111.1.11.1111111.1111.1.11.111111,�� \ U Zaole,�w� S I � LJ f acoozsae 50421)6 ) I _ J H LI 1 I 1 I __LL I LL L I I 1 LJ, N W il■�11.i�■�1 iEIMI.I. ■1iNCEMI O _ 3 Nom= I I I J I ,It I I 1 1 1 II II 11 II 11 I I 11 $ W�Zy I'�I:::':::I=3=.-I L_.._I_ -----1 _�_!LI.=1::_ _ -II I I-_I.. I._ Z 1 _:1:-::::I.. 1 [.--I::::::::L I__1 i 71......I. .:1:: ._ n I I...:I _T..._.. I_ t I _L_.. .L 1.... I I- 1; I I IL.._..I.... I. I._ MIM ii.. �._ r T._=I::._-I _I T_ :i1 1-1- --11 T::_-I ..1...I..: 1:__1__L�J_LT-- I T I -....I:=...I.....I 11- --I-1-1-11-1. -I-._�I__._.___�_��_...1- .I_._I .. T �I r r._��1_� ITl 1 1 I,I�_ 1 r 11_ . W 1T I I T 1. o W FRONT ELEVATION NICK M. 3/12/2019 c1/4'=1.0 ... 10.r. cs 3 I ow I O5, I .to_Z '§ Il x 11 ryuALM SCA. BC002988 CII i ice' 1 II a = C' iI ! 0 " I < o. c 3' , II 1woo§ w o I II v., r...,0 Z1, v II \\ i I II a \\i L I r cc I DRAWS DV NICK M. 3/12/2019 114.=SCALE'0• City of Orono ¢oN� Hardcover Calculation Worksheet f Property Address: 47- �N fS ND 1� Yrvf , ��R SHof Prepared by: �/nom V VOA-SSCAle'r Date: 3. 13 Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier:(Circle one) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 1:EXISTING HARDCOVER In the following table identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to site plan or survey(must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties,identify any features by letter which are split at the 75'setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. i1 to Key to Hardcover Item(Describe) Length x Width Total sAf J Survey (Square Feet) (Example)A (E451 G (24'x30') (720S.F.) B �,�US�� Gini k 114 S.F. C J•' + r+ie 1 tb S.F. i5fi G5G S.F. CrJ/ CC y!h S.F. S.F. CI . S.F. A nGlrl wails S S.F. rS 1 13 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. O S.F. S.F. Q S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. ✓ S.F. S.F. X S.F. S.F. S.F. (1) (1) Total Existing Hardcover — 14q 4 S.F. Excludable Hardcover(See City Code Sec 78-1684): S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover S.F. (3) Net Existing Hardcover [Subtract line(2)from line(1)1 S.F. (4) Total Lot Area j q 250 S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [(3)_(4)] ‘26* 7eJ % (Proposed Hardcover next page) Last Updated: July 2018 Note:This is an Information sheet only,every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the information contained herein; however,if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code,the Code provisions will prevail. Page 8 of 9 City of Orono iQNo\ Hardcover Calculation Worksheet I Property Address: 14:3-9-SN(O,r 5Lior.+, 7 ` „oa; Prepared by: 1 ria- V rCtSSGh Date: 3. I. 2,0)4} Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier:(Circle one) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 1 Step 2:PROPOSED HARDCOVER In the following table,identify all items of proposed hardcover on the property,keyed by letter to site plan or survey(must accompany this form). Include all existing hardcover items that are intended to remain, as well as all proposed hardcover items that will be added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict proposed hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties,identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Total Hardcover Item(Describe) Length x Width Survey (Square Feet) (Example) (Garage) a tci (24'x 30') (720 S.F.) A 7/ S.F. .v'�qq, SF S.F. 5 b> - n vcv�y r 4.-e1U S • S.F. S �C/2�,�,'l'�1,�a y/ (O S.F. F C14.S • _Vi tC� kC removed) �4g-S.F. eX] s Y e S S qz.S.F. H E`4rS ' •.-'fntn is (859{t daloc rte...-altert) Sit S.F. Z--Y4 S ' 1/`!400 rc 11 3 S.F. S.F. K t�-ropoSCd Olddi4-101 269 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. O S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. ✓ S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. (1) Total Proposed Hardcover .0'61C;/S.F. Excludable Hardcover(See City Code Sec 78-1664): S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover S.F. (3) Net Proposed Hardcover [Subtract line(2)from line(1)] 6---090 S.F. (4) Total Lot Area Jq,ZsO S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [(3)+(4)] 2k7/4(4% Last Updated: July 2018 Note:This is an information sheet only,every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the information contained herein;however,if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code,the Code provisions will prevail. Page 9 of 9 From: Adam Edwards To: Melanie Curtis Subject: RE:Variance Grading Review-LA19-000021/4775 NSD Date: Friday,March 22,2019 3:11:22 PM The plan does not show and grading changes however it seems clear the retaining wall and swale to the west side of the addition will need to be adjusted. Is this a good opportunity to address the encroachments on the city parcel that are shown on the survey? Adam From: Melanie Curtis Sent:Thursday, March 21, 2019 3:53 PM To: Adam Edwards<aedwards@ci.orono.mn.us> Subject:Variance Grading Review- LA19-000021/4775 NSD Adam Please review the attached plan to construct an addition to the home within the rear yard setback. A hardcover variance is also required/requested. I'm looking for comments from you by or before March 27th if possible; this will go to PC on April 15th You'll get another opportunity to review at the Building Permit. Thank you. iria Melanie Curtis, Planner Direct 952.249.4627 Planning &Zoning Office 952.249.4620 2750 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 Email: mcurtis@ci.orono.mn.us Website: www.ci.orono.mn.us All permitting is now done through our new online portal - LINK. March 12, 2019 To whom it may concern: My name is Paul Debettignies and I am the neighbor of the Wasschers who live at 4775 North Shore Drive. I understand that you you require neighbor comments as part of the approval process for the addition that they are proposing for their home. I aro aware of the addition and recognize that there may be some disruption due to construction. I have no concerns. Sincerely, Paul Debettignies 4755 North Shore Dr Gma�I Katrina Wasscher<kwasscher@gmail.com> Re: 4775 N Shore Dr project 1 message Nam Pham <namphamwecaredental@gmail.com> Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 9:18 AM To: Katrina Wasscher<kwasscher@gmail.com> Hi Katrina, Thanks for letting me know. I don't have any concern or questions. Good luck with the project as I'm sure it will be wonderful. Best regards, Nam Pham 952-239-5072 On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 7:59 AM Katrina Wasscher<kwasscher@gmail.com>wrote: Hi Nam, This is Katrina, your neighbor on North Shore Drive. I got your email from Paul, the tenant at 4755 N Shore. This summer, we plan a add a small addition (+/-250 square feet in total) to the far side of our house to add a bathroom. It won't be visible to your property. The city (and common courtesy) dictates that we notify you so that you can comment. I'm happy to answer any questions you may have. I'd be grateful if you'd reply to acknowledge receipt of this email. Many thanks, Katrina 763.218.9007 Best Regards, Nam Pham ' : s 1\_1 \ City owned lot ,`� * • ~ • tS 1 , • k, 0,,,,,s_ � h' ^ ;S ,../` S s. • .5 Subject ''''' .'slis' alr•i \ , }, ,' i • • i ` location of • addition f • • • ` r b • • ,, r 6lr, vr-9� ''',:01.','-."- ''....;•f*., '- likr,--,--' -••41.:::'.-:`,'"I.;:`'r. . ..,..- . 4' , yam. /x a� / / ` j • r> �� • 'p r. facing Northeast Location of addition ..74`,.-, � addition location V. , J F „,„,-,,,;,$�. € t . ..,,, 1, '*';'‘.•,'', \''''':'"I'''''‘:,, ....4"if.'. ' *, ., . -^;` ,, R y .{ 1� \ \i `£ _ .!"_„tea . r fr Facing Southeast re . ,.. ..... � r'`S ..1r /..5 tionr - `lion tocaLadds °t iiwall • encroachments ,,, , w �, fit �,r3'�� �"~ � r • � / .-,. .„„,„..... ,..„.;,,o, '':,- 91 -_'a',-„..„,„...,,,,4;4. ,y�. , i'L7+. , a.*.*y`{_ rS ,X'g'. �”' ,, .. r R t a } ,*,,,1:^,,,71,, ,7 •_ t' 4. ..,. ,..,:t. . .„., .„.„ .... gyp, " y 2 -•rc s +� * " at *� *.. ,. . 'Sa,.` `'. "� 4.7?::,,. i s, { �• �{,y-*� �'C �� ...`,:',J;.,.� ��.r� �r+"��� a i I � z�y.k '.��"� i,r y '�` x a C '.� . ., �f s R y: ' ,A.,6_,'',,:. '4 .- :, f V F 's+ fir, Y, r.' y` .� r; n �.-®a' . 1.....•:,- -'—` �y� �.14.,-:,�j�� €�s�� �r w. �`>-ft,�.�'�'�'�.r'^�''u,�..�V`-!��`,. � � ,._ F3�!P.:xt �'`.�`c`'* � •.' ''.-AN.' ' ": if4v,t. ,..,,,,,...44, -: .,:. :,+wy ? '+Y' } ,gy�v� . 'CRSS 1P/ St ': .� uft 4 T ryf,'' �,,.,;, y �' %,x, ,+. , 'k 'F (., " , eh`. <MM t '' 4 , sM� +.3Y•' 1. ; ",.,, i74„-.4..*'; ..,�. , t $, X � r ,. ,_..efi.,.. ... ., 7. 4. , ' • r...'' ': .- to,fE vt '":;1. - -;,-*.',,t4.'''. ..., • 53 At tiii �_ t[. :;' r d y .A 4pe. . / h wDY € „ „.- ` A ^K , f# „ -.-,..,...-,,.3,. ,- .,.....y..„, ;...,,,,, r I, „,,,,,_ ;,.. ,.....!„,t... ._:„... . '.. •�F „ r .. alam.y y •-r � ,� ;4 tt;aF s ' 'Y t r ,A.< �- ' 0.C ': 4 „.6,,,,,„ t} si ` y a 5 pt 4, *14.,„41'<-‘, fh. l,- §7►A h"% z -•,,,,,,?;',,,,,-/..,'''' ; 'tt� � �,^ a 9 � =�;.!mo '''','Y'-i-‘,.''-if * _ ° ,,5� t, �tii41 e{ � . ea • ,,ks,,� � � sYvz A ,ti, ny , 4a .. � � M-, . ft ` - i.4 *v.,,,,-,.,!/..4 . d e-. 4+ 4y�' � refa * '9w•d1' ~ ry14 vt �+ r444�yr%� • ! ' ,, y �r ' "� ',4s .fity J L11' ' ill' Nit. ;:. ....,4,4-2ei.. .. ....,,,,,,.., :-.,',.,?-1:;.t:orl'vir-1"-.."a .1.,;:,,,ti,%x,,tt:, • 177g.-11 0 c, f. r iol 7 ~`1 y, °„ 443 . , ,. $44 it • ,,,i-,,74/4;, Ltn,,... . '14— L • ,„...,,er...,...; ',.,6-1 , 0': .' •ami Q3 tr , A ,� e A' WY , .e , l ''_ "04-6' 'Y _;; RUN DATE:03/15/2019 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:1 36 12-117-24 14 0011 38 07-117-23 23 0027 38 07-117-23 32 0013 SWEDISH EVAN DWIGHT/PATRICIA AFFELDT TRST C GERBER&J GERBER 1175 CO RD NO 19 4765 TONKAVIEW LA 4753 TONKAVIEW CT MINNETRISTA MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 FAIRVIEW COVENANT CHURCH DWIGHT A AFFELDT CORY GERBER 1175 COUNTY RD 19 PATRICIA E AFFELDT JANICE GERBER MOUND MN 55364 4765 TONKAVIEW LA 4753 TONKAVIEW CT MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 36 12-117-24 14 0012 38 07-117-23 23 0035 38 07-117-23 32 0014 FAIRVIEW COVENANT CH NICHOLAS SCHMITT LARRY A GREENHAGEN ET AL 1155 CO RD NO 19 4740 TONKAVIEW LA 4739 TONKAVIEW CT MINNETRISTA MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 FAIRVIEW COVENANT CHURCH NICHOLAS SCHMITT L GREENHAGEN&V GREENHAGEN 1175 COUNTY RD 19 4740 TONKAVIEW LA 4739 TONKAVIEW CT MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 36 12-117-24 41 0001 38 07-117-23 23 0036 38 07-117-23 32 0019 J M GARRITANO&J TOKARCZYK S F VALEK&J VALEK H CRAWFORD&M M CRAWFORD 4801 MINNEAPOLIS AVE 4730 TONKAVIEW LA 4745 NORTH SHORE DR MINNETRISTA MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 JOSEPH GARRITANO STEVEN F&JOAN VALEK HERMAN&MARILYN CRAWFORD JILL TOKARCZYK 4720 TONKAVIEW LA 4745 NORTH SHORE DR 4801 MINNEAPOLIS AVE MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 36 12-117-24 41 0005 38 07-117-23 23 0037 38 07-117-23 32 0020 JULIANA L CHUGG ETAL S F VALEK&J VALEK THOMAS J CORNELISSEN ET AL 4845 MINNEAPOLIS AVE 4720 TONKAVIEW LA 4753 NORTH SHORE DR MINNETRISTA MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 JULIANA L CHUGG STEVEN F&JOAN VALEK THOMAS J CORNELISSEN 4845 MINNEAPOLIS AVE 4720 TONKAVIEW LA KAREN PRESTON MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 4753 NORTH SHORE DR MOUND MN 55364 36 12-117-24 41 0011 38 07-117-23 32 0003 38 07-117-23 32 0021 MONICA SABINA SHARMA-HANSSEN E&T CHRISTIANSON NAM&THANH PHAM 4825 MINNEAPOLIS AVE 4725 TONKAVIEW LA 4755 NORTH SHORE DR MINNETRISTA MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 MONICA SABINA SHARMA-HANSSEN EARL&TERRY CHRISTIANSON NAM PRAM 4825 MINNEAPOLIS AVE 4641 TONKA VIEW LANE THANH PHAM MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 4755 NORTH SHORE DR MOUND MN 55364 36 12-117-24 41 0012 38 07-117-23 32 0004 38 07-117-23 32 0022 J THOMAS SUERTH ALLEN BREDESON&ERICA NOAH BEN A WASSCHER TRUST ETAL 4831 MINNEAPOLIS AVE 4735 TONKAVIEW LA 4775 NORTH SHORE DR MINNETRISTA MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 J TOM SUERTH ALLEN BREDESON BEN A WASSCHER TRUST 4831 MPLS AVE 4735 TONKAVIEW LA KATRINA WASSCHER TRUST MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 4775 NORTH SHORE DR MOUND MN 55364 36 12-117-24 41 0013 38 07-117-2332 0009 38 07-117-23 32 0023 SLP ENTERPRISES LLC UNICO PROPERTIES LLC CITY OF ORONO 4815 MINNEAPOLIS AVE 4736 NORTH SHORE DR 4795 NORTH SHORE DR MINNETRISTA MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 SLP ENTERPRISES LLC UNICO PROPERTIES LLC CITY OF ORONO 18900 37TH AVE N 3205 CRYSTAL BAY RD P O BOX 66 PLYMOUTH MN 55446 WAYZATA MN 55391 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 36 12-117-24 41 0014 38 07-117-2332 0010 38 07-117-23 32 0057 JEFFREY S PINTO RYAN P TURNER KIM G&HONI L MARONDE 4821 MINNEAPOLIS AVE 4745 TONKAVIEW CT 4755 TONKAVIEW LA MINNETRISTA MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 JEFFREY S PINTO RYAN P TURNER KIM G&HONI L MARONDE 4821 MINNEAPOLIS AVE 4745 TONKAVIEW CT 4755 TONKAVIEW LA MINNETRISTA MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 38 07-117-23 23 0007 38 07-117-23 32 0011 38 07-117-23 32 0058 FAIRVIEW COVENANT CH TYLER M KOEPF A H&T K RASCHER 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 4749 TONKAVIEW CT 4705 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 FAIRVIEW COVENANT CHURCH TYLER M KOEPF ANDREW H&TRACY K RASCHER 1175 COUNTY RD 19 4749 TONKAVIEW CT P O BOX 166 MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 07-117-23 23 0013 38 07-117-23 32 0012 38 07-117-23 32 0066 FAIRVIEW COVENANT CHURCH S A SCHAUER&F E KOUBSKY B K ARENDS&T A ARENDS 4760 TONKAVIEW LA 4751 TONKAVIEW CT 4725 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 ORONO MN 55364 FAIRVIEW COVENANT CHURCH S A SCHAUER&F E KOUBSKY BRADLEY K ARENDS 1175 CO RD 19 4751 TONKAVIEW CT TEMPEST A ARENDS MOUND MN 55364 MOUND MN 55364 4725 NORTH SHORE DR MOUND MN 55364 RUN DATE:03/15/2019 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:2 38 07-117-23 32 0067 DE'CLINT&KAKENT 4731 NORTH SHORE DR ORONO MN 55364 DOUGLAS E KLINT KIMBERLY A KLINT 35480 NORTH 87TH PLACE SCOTTSDALE AZ 85266 Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases.Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available.The viewer should understand,however,that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties,either express or implied,or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. Hennepin Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Date: 3/15/2019 t"' ' ' s48'0 1105 y -VitViw'AViw x �4 � � ' tG ,t . Viliii iiii "; ,O.titimiitiallik-41i0ieNNUMNIN K z_ ' .-0875ill OYl4 witio -1111111111r !cal 1155 17-- 4830 4860 P ' pry ! 4730 it#02,@�- 4720 4753 48211111 t21 IIIIN 4'r�b :6 iW I0 ! 3 i C 1) 4809 4751- I7: " ` 1 4745 (!A .-...- 4736 (% '; 1f ,` 4685 � g � _ 4755 473 z �! 0 a - Om 4746 J •80la 5 T nF kle v 47'31 Af =�r'�'�'4 tit = 1._ .. -725 fes) 4705 4695 " ` � 4685 F Y dei , ?Y s 1 s� k 1 l s344 �„ ,j M0,1 A" `&zi t 3 ' t ' 'ilk *-k-iiiii7004WMeMil2b4 . 4r ,--. 0AigNg4fIrtUli.-AgiONORM5-•f':4K.USfflfiQAati;MI'riT'Th- -,- .11-4,181 Rigtlit444:el-Milir-Nr ?"ii-=i'j:i. >3. ii ver ..' ...- f# Buffer Size: 500 0 50 100 200 Feet Map Comments: IIIIIIIII 4775 North Shore Drive This data (i) 's furnished 'AS IS with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (I)is furnished withnowarranty of any kind; and (ii) is notsuitable for legal,engineering or surveying purposes.Hennepin Countyshal not be liable for any damage,injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information,contact Hennepin County GIS Office 300 6th Street South,Minneapolis,MN 55487/g i s.i nfo@hennepi n.us Date Application Received: March 16,2019 404/iitOAiO Date Application Considered as Complete:April 1,2019 120-Day Review Period Expires: July 30,2019 To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members >% r✓ Dustin Rief, City Administrator lkEsx&-� From: Jeremy Barnhart, Community Development Director Date: April 15, 2019 Subject: #LA19-000022,Mike Steadman o/b/o Eric J Larson and Andrea Larson Living Trust, 690 Brown Road,Preliminary Plat Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting preliminary plat approval for a 7 lot single family residential subdivision at 690 Brown Road. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval, subject to the conditions outlines below. Background Eric J Larson and Andrea Larson Living Trust are the owners of 690 Brown Road,a 23. 72 acre parcel on the western shore of Long Lake. The property also includes over 580 feet of frontage on Brown Road North. This project was the subject of a sketch plan(LA18-000095)reviewed in February by the City Council. The council supported that layout, including the proposed minor deviations of lot width due to the concave shoreline. The proposed layout is generally consistent with that proposal. The property generally drops from a high point near Brown Road to Long Lake and includes a number of wetlands, a seasonal creek,and a number of timber areas throughout the site. There is one existing home,this will be retained on proposed lot 6. The proposal includes the creation of a new private road terminating in a cul de sac. This road will intersect with Brown Road at Brown Road's intersection with Sugarwood Drive to the west. 7 lots are proposed, each meeting the minimum standard for lot size, 2 acres of dry buildable land. All lots will be served with municipal water and sewer. The property is within the MUSA currently. FILE#LA19-000022 April 15,2019 Page 2 of 4 LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-305—LR-1A Lot Area/Width: In the LR-1A zoning district, all lots must include a minimum of 2 acres of dry-buildable area, and 200 feet of width. Gross Dry Non- Lot Width At Area Buildable buildable (At BSL) OHWL 75 • 206 (At Lot 1 2.04 2.04 Brown Rd) Lot 2 5.41 4.16 1.25 533 Lot 3 3.08 2.08 1.00 170 Lot 4 3.53 3.45 0.08 202 224 Lot 5 2.33 2.01 0.32 206 220 Lot 6 3.88 3.05 0.83 185 205 Lot 7 2.46 2.41 0.05 428 Items in Bold are non-conforming,but supported by the City Council. Section 78-1403-Structural Coverage All lots being greater than 2.0 acres will be exempt from the structural coverage limitation. Section 78-1680 and 78-1700-Hardcover Calculations (Stormwater Quality Overlay District) The subject parcel is in Tier 1, due to its proximity to Long Lake and the tributary. Upon subdivision, each lot will be assigned a Tier. These assignments have not been completed. It is anticipated that lots 1-6 will be Tier 1 (25%)and lot 7 may be Tier 2 (30%). Tier assignments will be made as part of the final plat. Analysis Comprehensive Plan. The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, including in use and density. Streets. The developer proposes the construction of a single, new private road that will terminate in a cul de sac. The length of the road is 1000 feet,meeting the maximum length requirement. This road will provide vehicular access for all lots. Covenants will be necessary to restrict access onto Brown road for lots 1, 6, and 7. The city engineer is reviewing the street details and will provide comment,to be incorporated into the final construction plans. Utilities. All 7 lots will be served by municipal water and sewer. Water is in Brown Road ROW, and will be used to serve a new main to be located within the new road, and will terminate in a hydrant at the end of the cul de sac. A second hydrant is proposed at the property line between lots 6 and 7. The Fire Chief has recommended a third additional hydrant at the entrance to the neighborhood. Sanitary sewer will be collected and channeled to a new lift station within lot 1. Staff recommends that in lieu of a liftstation for these 6 lots,the sanitary sewer should be a low pressure FILE#LA19-000022 April 15,2019 Page 3 of 4 system with individually owned pumps at each house. Storm sewer is proposed to be managed via a combination of rain gardens in lots 1, 4, 5, and 6. The remaining stormwater will also be managed by a linear pond on Lot 2. Staff recommends all elements of the storm system required to meet regulatory requirements must be included in and completed as part of the development work. We should not allow future raingardens on lots as a way to meet the overall development needs. Individual rain gardens introduce unnecessary administrative issues at the time of house construction and in perpetuity. Grading. The grading plan shows grading to support the new road and house pads for each lot. Engineering comments related to grading and utilities will be incorporated into the resolution for preliminary plat. Parks. The plan does not include any park area. Park dedication will be satisfied by a cash donation for the 6 new lots. Brown Road includes an existing trail along the west side of Brown Road. No sidewalk is proposed along the new private road. Landscaping. The applicant has provided a landscaping plan,showing 43 trees along the new road, and plantings at the entrance. The number of trees exceeds the requirement of one tree per 40 feet of street. Staff would recommend the trees be planted in clumps, a more natural effect rather than in a linear pattern. The applicant also proposes retention of trees along the perimeter, to preserve the character there. Average Lakeshore setback(ALS). ALS is based on the location of the homes on the adjacent lots. Given two new lake shore lots,and not knowing the timing of construction,the developer proposes an artificial ALS for lots 4 and 5. This is shown on the preliminary plat and protects the views of the existing adjacent lake shore lots. Staff supports this for the intial construction of Lots 4 and 5. Engineer Comments. Engineering comments related to grading and utilities will be incorporated into the resolution for preliminary plat. Their main comments can be summarized into stormwater management and sanitary sewer treatment. Public Comments Staff has received one comment letter, attached as Exhibit I. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Commission have any issues or concerns with this application? Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat,subject to the following: 1. Sanitary should be low pressure system with individual privately owned pumps. 2. All elements of the storm system required to meet regulatory requirements must be included in and completed as part of the development work. 3. Engineering comments included in Engineers letter of April 8, 2019. 4. The addition of a fire hydrant at the entrance to the development 5. Reconfiguration of street trees. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Summary Exhibit B. Proposed Plans FILE#LA19-000022 April 15,2019 Page 4 of 4 Exhibit C. Narrative Exhibit D. Conservation Design Exhibit E. MCWD permit application Exhibit F. City Engineer Memo Exhibit G. Fire Chief Comments Exhibit H. Public hearing mailing information Exhibit I. Public Comment Land Use Application Summary Application Date: 03/16/2019 Address: 690 BROWN RD LONG LAKE, MN 55356 Parcel Number: 3411823120007 Land Use Number: LA19-000022 Application Submitted Agent on behalf of property owner By: Owner: Name: ERIC & ANDREA LARSON Address: 690 BROWN RD N LONG LAKE, MN 55356 Applicant: Name: MIke Steadman Company: Coldwell Banker Burnet Address: 201 East Lake St Wayzata, MN 55391 mbsteadman@cbburnet.com Contact Information: Associated Contact: Mark Gronberg markg@gronbergassoc.com Associated Contact: MIke Steadman mbsteadman@cbburnet.com Associated Contact: Chuck Alcon alcon@usinternet.corn Associated Contact: Project Description: Preliminary Plat - Willow Bay Sanctuary Land Use Application Amendmend Application Type: Appeal of Admin Decision 0 Concept Application Li Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Application Ls Subdivision Application Subdivision Exception Vacation Application ( I Variance Application clt Applicant Signature: Z=� WILLOW BAY SANCTUARY1-2 Wof� TITLE PAGE Q5Y 000- (ng 0tloX Cepan Z W ... u 9 o. i 0 VICINITY SKETCH TABLE OF CONTENTS �$ 1. TITLE PAGE 2. PRELIMINARY PLAT a��! 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS t;t; 4. PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN 4 5 PRELIMINARY EROSION CONTROL AND SWPPP PLAN 6. PRELIMINARY ROAD PLAN AND PROFILE " 7. PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN w [11 aN WILLOW BAY SANCTUARY 6 "'4 "EY PRELIMINARY PLAT aWir a5 co °4!C Egg:t IMI i4......7.....17,______ ' Wow __ Z6�. o =o zYa 1 V �; >, w� y,m.A Hurz -,r-kc c 5,c=�- V --- —�� v {�1%, w•It \i y�\ F L .®1 Y ` \ ..,10,,i," ,,,,i,1,1', � ,� i rA vel A � /y�3� '� -- � ❑' --4,,fi ,5 i �ti 1 p ,,.- § a I/ 2 -1.,, ASCI 4 - I J ...,,t,,. +,� I 4)6-.AG 0 /J l .A} cii \-4'� � ri 4Rl "Afftlr j am,i ,-, #. r - Parr , \ '--•••.\:=1- � �r•-• 2'47'-' ''I 11� .,--' r s4;., .xa � ''---J�i� Ac "��_ % €g� 11"IP-',*.. me�'I ... — N' ,vis,/, '. ,2y2' A7_-:: LEGALCommmarqe..�saa�.a :o.�.m E. �,n».... �;�"°�""'"'v" 1 r _' rr�i,A`'` `,� � -� �•` °ms' s, .wm. °`° � !ill! E�000sE Y ' .� 8 -_/' s. ; ww.M� M �zrs nx 11 xcn (/ 4 / ///r �{�(T�{\�/\,�{�� 7.0....— � ` �.f Y � 1:0:27,-: ..ow epnuq M b,N M •.c � y r v246.A0 — 6 I „ ,•;1....`,;pI y N 7;..E.'— 'ron. M 33 e ,_ •' e �l . �aI I,/„'",'.(1'- Y1/1/ ¢/l 1 �.0,,o,,,,,.. �.m.w�c..a w..en e.v - ILS M..gusner of.Nortneag Quarter 015..114 1,071 i S.�1� AS: IIKA.I s d . t P aE�ac.`w”" >« ..�batonce aa.« �.« - mmaven o a •awror 01.0 OP leat Memo caa-r ,,, -� � e�a w.+w�«-+r-cin.u.�a degrees DID g Bumps .w c...e w= o u 0 100 200 400 -_ .o2O.r w..ms. x _ ! SCALE IN FEET �� TREE; PROTECTION AREA 111 E} WILLOW BAY SANCTUARY 10:1 EXISITING CONDITIONS AND TREE INVENTORY 51'5 00 .- co g 0„g nst.7., 1 ,s -7------ -,--,-------------- _,- EK gi N. (.7 !•,!: 1,,,',.'. "*",,,;;,,k,;„,,,,/,..,„,:,;; r 4.1 .50-IUL r4---4---i,z r'-\- --------- {e ir..,- Et PIC ir'''''''' r,::::: t•zz: it:t 11E- ik;1 ..., k k''-kl kl.' . '0 _,')ii'l' "40,k.'"-',---• • \..3'.'''.\\'., ''',•.'?'15',-*• • -,-k ' '-'11'.' ''," ' '''''' /0/,'"1 ,'''''Oss‘', ‘-, '‘ ''-' '"--, k.''''\''',' . ,V''''' ",:,' ' 'P\,%• c' IR. a: EiFS- -nzlr, :-...: Ela..2 ii:M. :ii........ ..4.1!gi 1 ii,,/,‘,:;,,,;,,,1,,,,y,..,,,ii; )) ) (t)3)) . ,,,...-,_..,:.:-:- ...--,_:•--,-,..:i -•••- ,,;. .F.6... „a„..._ siii: .......... -.... :.-aiii 7,iFi't , -'-.--'').)-)±)--:-:---1: ., I ' -0 -'7. ; 'i'i'i'0 1 i „;,,,i/ .----- ,,,_.. '/„.-• ___ WAV [' „-1„„„,„:,'/,_4:'7.{i ; 1 r 4,.: / 9- , , ,'',/ • / ' - --/ -- , .-• hi 44,7 ,',,, ,,,-.',,,,, --., :-.‘, \-,, - , -,7 ,, ..,,,,,//./.,-„,,,,,,:-.-/-*„.. J '. Idis i tip I I. •.,, S fiw/:r-7,6 ,-_:-_-----(,;:b. - , go., *2 i'';'///..5; -- , -' ....< '''''' -:;:)./',/,zAx, MI 1 ki k -------.'. '1-- 7---- • - -,'.;''1::"..? ,t i C7:40,1,), '1 ---..,,k .....,- /Iiklialeilialli~/MbAliiiitiV, ,•7•' --•,- k',.. ,;„ _____ I i V ' —--—--—-------- g 4 0 100 200 400 ''''''*".i.•..-. --1 SCALE IN FEET ......•....v....," romw.,... TOTAL 041 Y•20 911 AC! $ i E i ,.., WILLOW BAY SANCTUARY lq PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN Z W • e�•' EXISTING CONTOUR / - W a Y ---II-V -:PROPOSED CONTOUR Is�I PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION I �st'''- '� g — V (� 1 �_ I_` C - NOTE:HOUSE PAD GRADES SHOWN `\ 1 --14-110„.1" - W o co)- FOR REFERENCE ONLY PADS TO BE wN? ARE CONSTRUCTED LATER WHEN HOUSES \ � / Y $ ARE CONSTRUCTED. "�/ *61E5 _ V A -j' _ m=oa«I _ ` - -0 `0 BO 160 SCALE IN FEET ,� { a F" i I .- / � . - -tom." ,A„ , , _ ' ,/ F CII 4 A Y $I 4 d e °F<�/ S -s -' ��P, s, -L„ I"� �I B 1z,o! . • is ,' A ,11/ . iFT''' A , , ,,) t9, 0 (� '�M ^ate Y III 1 \ f�/ 1�\`� i, � ��' �- 1.� ��'.' "..\ t �I 1 1 �j' O ."a Seas. 446_ ���r I it 1001,......f:, `� cmc v� I II ,y ,/� " ►444.44116A1741100011040��7Cr moi` �y 'v w. / I it ' �� —z _ v ' 39 �_� IIII /1/ - , —1, P � tei � z �// L. Io � LIN � � 6 a, , , �' P� Feq� �5� /x 1 Im RAM At No ' ' 1---',,A,' y o 2t 27 20 1 in 4431,~ 7 -- ai BUFFER\ ` - 30 3D 1.l 8 d ( -�1"1 / �I� ,��i> L' WILLOW BAY SANCTUARY un...1.:-.7 PRELIMINARY EROSION CONTROL AND SWPP PLAN 6; ;'1 c3,.„.._ m.g m _, a a,...; LutL'Elv, Z f, LI -____-___=,. - ... .. '; ,"N- ---- __;471Z7f17.", Rgli ..-...--__ , , ,,,- ,k. -'2P- 570, \‘‘ ' ,.- -- 0 "-,,, -, AirAp. ",,-- ---"ff.jr/ e. ' '''.' _ ,,,,.17.7.....,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,, ::.,....,,,,,m7.......--rp,,,,,,,,r=41,4W...44.441.. NN:„,,,,.,\.::,_, .-...- •v..,..7.-.F.-...---,...,,,,,,,,,,,....1..,m,.. .,...,.........i,vad,..:S.7:41:1:+7,F.,*r.- ,... _n ........„... ........„ . --if .__......_._._,.___....._ Y....---,,./1l/f..t - : _:_ ,.„.'--.7,7,_-:::•:',..Iff:. •7"."..Z:;,,,,,..,,,,,,..,...,...,___,,,„.. ,_,,.,,,Z1,,l' 4 , Wir-,,,,„.2,14,,%46,;,7\:,,,,, r .-,,•,.`......,,,-„,,-2;',-/.04,..-A ,/-/...,,..,/s3 5 s._A, , --,-- \...1 ^^.2.-.4.-....-41...-t.,.-ram...-.1:::,,,=...7-...?,..... ' ..,,.........„„„..,....................... j; '' I'r''‘v '( '' ' a I--,_.....-- ;:-'- ,z<Vr 7 \ ,‘,-,-7,-/i:-,Ig',-A°s:- =t,..,,---:*. ., •^-,.„.7._„-,:m..1,..-...--...,...,".r.:sr.a"...a....-re.=.g.",-,.... .-,,,....,7, =:„.77.7.....- __ 4 .............,....._,.....,.,. .,t:t_:,„:7,4_,::: _,-.,-;;,-; ;---„_--...:;;;;_ ____ I, Is, '743.7...-.r.-..-...--2,.=-=."...w.t.ra mr.., €, - '- I I''''Z'7.3-:''''',. ;-•-'-;•=‘*V V.-..''.-. -35.—. .2,'-- 6 ''.'N'ii. ,(' .>r?'-`--e' -_---,-;--W -.'-'. --- ---1 affa.1:1747'47Tt 744.7-7 41 gf.trZ7.474"..', 7...74...-.,..,--•—.------ ll, 1 `:z...7.'...,,. y II Ili, reo,r'-',,- , .-.=-,,.1 pgiti,'--',3"', •-,,k-:-,,.°7 4' .,e%/: -/,'''';-F--- '11-2‘" i" ?) ' Ad itII.• ,,..,:',/1, ,,,,---,_ ',, fr-/- /1 sf a'7<tz..'-'"-'7r at.-,...4.117-, I re'i ja lt°1%).., ,,,17 I .., ...., iv.. ;—":-....4",'"--- , , .,,,,,n,-------- 'k.--"•.,(,,,trx. ' ---- ., ',..a T-':-.::r.7--E:-.,----..T.-s.,..L.-....--1.7,1,,,,,,,.-,,-,,,,' :.L 7::7----—'''''""-"""-- 5 1,:'-tl,'1,'' ' • / s--z.-2'.,',',, --- , _ ',_ LA'! ),','': 's , 13, ; '•.-.--- 1 l'-'1 '\'' -' - 7': -----G,IPPE-7''-'&P P - I 1\ •lar...:-......,";t...",,,,m-......-..-,1144744•4.-- 51.7174“."-r4,4"='"&a7'4"'"''="'"..44... 4 1 A 0 100 200 400P-7.- 11 1, 1 SCALE IN FEET :,..4,r;.:`,L.4.4,7,2,1F,:17-..1.24,44.4.1,44:4,4.411,444. •,,,,,,,,,,T..7.4..,f,rtgr"............"'".".' ran,onr..an..nc --..—..........,...,....... 11 ; WILLOW BAY SANCTUARY PRELIMINARY ROAD PLAN AND PROFILE 4' V Sm e n / i, \ 1y �`�` W.'-1,1, F 311+ ISI r1i „i� i j -4�`� .� ' C: — -ER— q—, ,—, — \. , / -A8-8 --- i '/ ''' li‘f" tilY---",..4.. .!E:I. .1" i ,'lir , , , , - , A -- <„, _ _ 331 / �,,1 of wE ,' / ro a f 344 1St 4 1°°� (1, � ''',"4r� i �� l'i �0 a 4ki0i4''s \ ' t l ���^elf \' rL ' -. V - .. - z .,. _ .\, 1 , * _ _ : 19901 ,g ""......"-Z,4-114101111, ` Pi"'• ' �r ✓°.y 4 ' 11 DLZ ��- , - .428 �,�,r67iiiial��E�� � .�..+' � N� � R / S3g�� Illy I ._i /-- IIl 1vip, 1 +/ "� Lii{ in "" D . y` / / z III I o` h' �. ` i / I ill � o 1 `� l��l i 1 I 1 I j WILLOW BAY COURT ' I r 1 ais� 1 --, 1 I I I r 4 , 1 I I I i3;` a 990, 11 ". r _ :5.49_ E1.2=1 1 -P am.,,,,4,0 I 1. ELEV:Bili 1 1 1 1 c t 1 1 M-O 1 1 I ' Vc-111 1 j t 1 M s s. 9801 Nj03T I C 11-'1 _I- 1 Y 220 , 1 ^V,1y000 y— 1 980_ k I 1 1 j' 1 1 n,,cr' i- 1 k vc'sa95eo, 1 1 I 1 4 970k I I. •j•,,, I 9 I a.. 1 j 1 , "'� N _ ' 1 970 8 �' 960 I I I I 1 — I 1 1 1__t___, I- z'o ill ._960 > is I I A I I I I ' I § _ a 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 8 ,i 10 a", WILLOW BAY SANCTUARY II- V.n PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN w'1° g Y ^. / 1' ------ ,4J _ Ti Vic- W317 ,�P�c//� 311+ S 72 �.3, >\c\- ,nEo _,_ .iii / c.,,,,' itort:°/ *----& s a 39 I r, it Ems' / /,, ... Z Plo ��,'/ 3''', 01.1 y Z c Www 1 E P �� Il' .� 0 —a \, '411;'" (0 '',. s --17)1 '',*1.111til:I.SIONIttit 1 1 I'', ' 1 \30 --- ,,,O.q. .°.,<:::::;.'7.-, z ,04) /, ' 4 5 8+ � �_I � i m � I + i fes% I s � °I11, I � E— - k t3 .,r / II N ' ,- a d I t i I I IiiiI 1000 1 i I T 1 I I i I I I 1 ; 1 I, 11444 1 I illi I. s.1 I k I t 1 ` I 9801 µ I 198o Eiti ,Z i I I "21;_ 1 I i 1 I---1 t r I 1 1 - I 11 1 I�-84 I I lid s 980 _ ...� w' I I I -7- -- m1. L I .$Q.Q 1 I I >� .W, f I �_-- 1 960 _ : 960 1 970 I t \� .. ' .� 1 ,,, I , 970 g ta =-`'", �' ,a 950 a 960! 1 I -4- \ 4 - = �� _ 960 T.. I T 'eN 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ❑ i b; 01 CHILTON STONE EDGING WITH CEDAR MULCH { " < te= vk-kry-/-/' t , 1 c , , \t v t WY---—' . 7 " . •,115, ,�;�' Aria■ I �� ;_,.._,.. _ ),, =.4 , Off �) j .,_. 46 0 ENTRYWAY ilk1 , � �, w. isitspiwo: LEGEND OLDCROPPINGS/WALL PROPOSED SIGN LOCATION .arY coy FLOWER,r'EROJIAL i 22 0 IEPATA,WALKERS LOU I 29 0 GRASS,FEATHER REED SI-RUB,DECIDUOUS II 0 HYDRANGEA,LIMELIGF1i 6*LILAC,DWARF KOREAN I BROWN ROAD NORTH TREE,DECIDUOUS 6 0 BIRCH 0.UPTACf PovER I iTREE EVERGREEN L 6)SPRUCE SLACK HILLS Revision#: Scale: \',/ Landscape Plan: 1 Landscape Design by: Jul! Neuharth Date: 3/4/2019 1/8 =1' /NWillow Bay Sanctuary Entrance, Backyard Reflections, Inc C.so4 ///i F co 0 0 0 im 0 t J J J J o Q0s Cl ie* .*1 Nt Ai Revision#: Landscape Plan: 1 Date: 2/28/2019 Willow Bay Sanctuary Scale: , Landscape Design by: Juli Neuharth 1:500 ---1\ Backyard Reflections, Inc WILLOW BAY SANCTUARY PRELIMINARY PLAT PROJECT NARRATIVE • Executive Summary-This Preliminary Plat implements the land use direction and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan; all lots meet the area, set back and buffer requirements. In addition, with the implementation of the requested connections to City sanitary sewer and water in combination with the storm water management facilities and BMP's typically required with MCWD review and approval, the water quality of Long Lake, currently assigned a grade of D, will be measurably improved. • The Details- • Eric and Andrea Larson are requesting a review of a Preliminary Plat for a residential development at 690 N. Brown Road, PID # 3411823120007, a 24.37 acre parcel immediately adjacent to and with lake shore on Long Lake. The development objectives are to achieve a reasonable density given the site characteristics and achieve the highest and best use of the property. • The proposed Preliminary Plat includes a total of 7 lots, 6 new lots (2 new lake shore) for single family homes, and 1 lake shore lot with an existing single family residence and one seasonal dock. The driveway for the existing residence will be removed and relocated to intersect the new roadway. • A single roadway access from Brown Road, aligned across from the entrance to the Sugarwoods development is proposed with a cu-de-sac This new roadway is proposed as a 7 ton, 24' width private road with an HOA responsible for snowplowing and maintenance; the HOA will also be responsible for the maintenance of the MCWD mandated storm water facilities on the project. • There are extensive wetlands on the property, which constitute 14.3% of the land area, not including the required buffers, and an unnamed water source in the north central part of the site. These have been delineated; the delineation was completed by Sambatek via their report dated July 7, 2016; the delineation is current. This report was submitted to MCWD for field verification and acceptance. This action was suspended and will be resumed with this application and field verified in the spring of 2019, when the growing season returns. • Sanitary sewer and water services are proposed as connections to the existing City utility services in Brown Road; this approach was selected due to the environmentally sensitive nature of the parcel and the adjacent lake, with a current lake quality grade of D. The grade differential will probably require a lift station with an emergency generator. Construction is planned for the early summer of 2019 with lots ready for home builders by August 2019. . • Park dedication is proposed as cash in lieu of land, one park dedication credit for the existing residence is requested. • Small utilities will be serviced by a joint trench using services now available on Brown Road, including three phase power for the lift station. • There are also woodlands in the SW and NE areas of the site; the tree preservation and Conservation Design report will address this site characteristic. • The total length of the shoreline, applying the LMCD definition of the line of contact of the body of water in the lake with the non-linear shoreline is 619+/-ft.; Lot 6 is 211+/-ft., Lot 5 is 206+/- ft., and Lot 4 is 202+/- ft. The two required shoreline distances for each lot, applying a linear point to point evaluation standard for an authorized dock for each lot are, 200 feet at the lake shore and 200 feet at the 75 foot setback from the lakeshore. These two requirements are met for new lots 5 and 6; for Lot 4 the 200' at the 75' setback is met and 92.5 % of the 200'requirement at the lakeshore is met (185'). This reduced length for lot 4 is due to the application of a linear evaluation requirement to a non-linear condition. Seasonal docks for all three lake lots are therefore justified. • A proposed Average Lakeshore Setback approach is indicated on the Preliminary Plat. Willow Bay Sanctuary City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota Conservation Design Application Prepared for Mike Steadman, CB Burnet by Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company, Inc. (KES Project No. 2019-012) March 28, 2019 Willow Bay Sanctuary City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota Conservation Design Application TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1 Project Description and Location 1 Intention and Requirements 1 2. RESPONSE TO REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURES 2 Goals and Policies 2 Rural Oasis Study 2 Natural Resources Inventory 3 3. CONSERVATION DESIGN MASTER PLAN 4 Consider Existing Drainage Systems 4 Establish Stormwater Management System 4 Remove Invasive Species and Diseased Trees 5 Protect Significant Tree Stands and Woodlands 5 Protect Wetlands and Augment Buffers 5 Justify and Mitigate Impacts to Ecological Communities 6 Maintain Ecological Connections 6 Maintain and Protect Positive Views 6 Preserve or Reinterpret Landmarks 6 4. DENSITY BONUS 7 5. LONG-TERM PRESERVATION 7 FIGURES 1. Site Location 2. Minnesota Land Cover Classification System 3. Delineated Wetlands and Waters 4. MCWD Wetland Management Classifications 5. Ecologically Significant Areas and Natural Resource Corridors 6. Proposed Plan APPENDICES A. Rural Oasis Study Corridor Photographs B. Minnesota Land Cover Classification System C. Tree Survey, Topography, and Existing Drainage Map D. Wetland Delineation Report Excerpt E. Proposed Grading and Drainage Plan F. Landscape Plan Willow Bay Sanctuary City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota Conservation Design Application 1. INTRODUCTION Project Description and Location Willow Bay Sanctuary is a seven-lot single-family residential development proposed on 24.37 acres in the City of Orono. The development will include a public street to be known as Willow Bay Court. The property is located at 690 Brown Road N, in the NE '/4 of Section 34, Township 118 North, Range 23 West, City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota. The site is situated east of Brown Road N, about 500 feet north of Wayzata Blvd W, and about 1,500 feet north of Highway 12 (Figure 1). The property corresponds to Hennepin County PID 34-118-23-12-0007. The existing site is a single residential estate lot with a paved driveway, a large home, a detached garage, and an outdoor swimming pool. The building site and lawn cover about 1.75 acres. The rest of the property includes about 9.03 acres of woodland, 8.40 acres of grassland/upland meadow, and 3.62 acres of delineated wetland. The property is bordered on the east by Long Lake, the north and south by residential lots, and the west by Brown Road N. Intention and Requirements This application is submitted to demonstrate compliance with the City of Orono Conservation Design Ordinance, which is intended to preserve and enhance the ecological/aesthetic character of development areas. The site is proposed for development as a Conservation Design in accordance with Sections 78-1631 through 78-1640 and Section 82-300 of the Orono Municipal Code. Conservation Design Master Planning is required because the total project area is greater than five acres. Conservation Design requirements include: 1. protection and enhancement of drainageways and water quality; 2. protection and enhancement of ecological communities; 3. reinforcement and establishment of ecological connections; 4. augmentation and preservation of viewsheds; 5. preservation and improvement of views; and 6. preservation or reinterpretation of local landmarks. 1 Willow Bay Sanctuary Conservation Design Application 2. RESPONSE TO REQUIREMENTS AND PROCEDURES Goals and Policies Conservation Design requires response to the Goals and Policies for Environmental Protection and Natural Resource Management, which are established in the Orono Community Management Plan, and to the recommendations contained within the Orono Natural Resources Inventory. The project is consistent with applicable Environmental Protection provisions set forth in the City of Orono 2010-2030 Community Management Plan. These goals include: • Preserve marshlands, wetlands and natural drainage systems; • Manage surface water to protect the City from flooding and pollution; • Preserve native woodlands when possible; • Protect and preserve natural habitats; and • Protect land from soil erosion. The project is also consistent with applicable Policies for Natural Resource Management set forth in the City of Orono 2010-2030 Community Management Plan. Relevant policies include: • Favoring natural drainageways and retention of runoff over storm sewers where feasible; • Protection and preservation of wetlands and marshlands; • Protection of lake resources, allowing reasonable access while preventing overcrowding; • Protection of lake shorelines and lake beds from alteration; • Restriction of floodplain development and alterations; • Protection of wetlands includes protection of adjacent upland buffers; • Inclusion of natural resource investigation as part of this development proposal; • Inclusion of on-site water retention facilities as part of this development plan; • Inclusion of erosion control as part of this development plan; • Application of erosion control BMPs to land alterations; • Adherence to Conservation Design principles; and • Retain natural woodlands and open space to the degree feasible. Rural Oasis Study Conservation Design requires response to the Rural Oasis Study contained in the City of Orono 2010-2030 Community Management Plan. The proposed project is located on Brown Road N, which is classified as a local public street according to the City of Orono 2010-2030 Community Management Plan. The project area does not fall within or adjacent to a corridor documented in the Orono Rural Oasis Study. The nearest corridor shown in the Orono Rural Oasis Study is County Road 6, which is located about 0.4 2 Willow Bay Sanctuary Conservation Design Application mile north of the project area. The visibility of the site from arterial and collector roadways is limited by its location. The nearest roadway for which a corridor analysis similar to those in the Rural Oasis Study could be prepared is Brown Road N. This part of Brown Road N has an edged corridor enclosure due to the nearly solid walls of wooded vegetation that border the roadway. Review of site conditions,photographs available on Google Street View, and project plans indicate the proposed project will not appreciably change the viewshed, visibility of landmarks, or aesthetic character of Brown Road N due to the wooded buffer to be maintained along the road corridor (Appendix A). Natural Resources Inventory MLCCS Data Minnesota Land Cover Classification System (MLCCS) data, Level 1 assessment shows the site mapped as: (1) forests, (2)planted or cultivated vegetation, (3) artificial surfaces and associated areas, and (4) herbaceous vegetation. The MLCCS Level 3 assessment shows the site mapped as: (1) altered/non-native deciduous forest, (2) hayfield, (3) cattail marsh - semipermanently flooded, (4) short grasses with sparse tree cover on upland soils, and (5) buildings and pavement with 76-90% impervious surface (Figure 2, Appendix B). Field observations indicate plant communities on the site are consistent with these classifications, as the site generally consists of deciduous woodland, open grassland, wetlands, and a home with a manicured lawn. Tree Survey A survey of significant trees measuring at least six inches in diameter at breast height(DBH) was completed for the part of the site to be affected by construction of Willow Bay Court and an adjacent stormwater pond. The edge of woodland was located throughout the property by surveyors, but individual trees were not surveyed in the periphery of the property. The project is designed to use custom-built homes that will minimize tree removal outside of the Willow Bay Court right-of-way. Surveyed tree locations, tag numbers, and species are presented in Appendix C. Wetland Inventory The property was inspected in the field for wetlands by Sambatek on July 6, 2015. This investigation identified and delineated four wetlands and one other water resource (a narrow watercourse) within the site. Delineated wetland boundaries were located using a Trimble Geoexplorer 6000 GPS unit and a Wetland Delineation Report was prepared by Sambatek and submitted to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District(MCWD) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) in July of 2016. As of March 22, 2019, the wetland delineation was awaiting review by MCWD and USACE staff. Figure 3 shows the delineated wetland boundaries. An excerpt from the Wetland Delineation Report is included in Appendix D. MCWD wetland management classifications for wetlands on the site are shown on Figure 4. 3 Willow Bay Sanctuary Conservation Design Application Topographic Survey and Existing Drainage Patterns Gronberg&Associates completed a topographic survey of the property. The site generally drains to overland and through the narrow watercourse (other water resource)to Long Lake (Figure 3). The property is not known to include any existing storm sewers or water quality treatment basins. Much of the site falls within the Shoreland Overlay District of Long Lake. Detailed review of the existing topography indicates the site does not include any bluffs as defined in the City of Orono Shoreland Management Ordinance. Compliance with shoreland requirements is discussed further under the section of this narrative titled Maintain and Protect Positive Views. Appendix C shows the topographic survey and existing drainage patterns. Orono Natural Resources Inventory Recommendations The property includes few areas that are the subject of recommendations set forth in the Orono Natural Resources Inventory (Figure 5). The site does not include: 1. MLCCS Regional Ecological Corridors, 2. Priority Natural Resource Corridors, 3. Regionally Significant Ecological Areas, 4. plant communities mapped by the Minnesota DNR Biological Survey, or 5. natural areas with identified potential for rare species. However, the site does include part of a conceptual greenway corridor and part of a floodplain identified in the Orono Natural Resources Inventory (Appendix B). This conceptual corridor extends northwest from Long Lake along the watercourse in the northern part of the site (Appendix B,Figure 3). Preservation of woodland, wetland, and the watercourse is expected to minimize potential effects on the conceptual greenway. 3. CONSERVATION DESIGN MASTER PLAN Consider Existing Drainage Systems Existing drainage includes overland flow toward wetlands, the narrow watercourse, and Long Lake. The site has no known surface drain inlets or storm sewers. Lake Minnetonka and limited areas that drain to surface storm sewer inlets. After project construction, runoff will generally follow existing drainage patterns, but runoff from Willow Bay Court will drain through grassed ditches and then to a stormwater basin prior to discharge to wetlands and Long Lake. Rain gardens are planned to treat backyard runoff in four locations (Figure 6). The existing drainage system is shown in Appendix C. The proposed drainage system is shown in Appendix E. Establish Stormwater Management System Stormwater will be managed in compliance with local, state, and federal regulations to provide rate, volume, and sediment control as shown on the Proposed Grading Plan (Appendix E). The project includes design elements that minimize stormwater runoff effects on water quality and quantity, including grassed ditches, rain gardens, a stormwater pond, limiting soil disturbance 4 Willow Bay Sanctuary Conservation Design Application and grading, and construction of custom new homes to comply with lakeshore setback and impervious surface ratio limits. Remove Invasive Species and Diseased Trees Dead, damaged, and diseased trees will be removed during site redevelopment where necessary. Invasive species known to occur on the site include reed canary grass, ground ivy, Canada thistle, common burdock, and common buckthorn. Limited site grading will remove these species from some areas during site redevelopment. Graded areas that are not paved for the access street or driveways will be established with new seeding, lawn, and landscaping. Protect Significant Tree Stands and Woodlands Significant trees will be protected and preserved to the extent feasible. Some tree removal will be required to install the new street, driveways, utilities, and homes. The site includes about 9.03 acres of woodland. Grading for the street, stormwater pond, and homes is expected to remove about 1.56 acre of tree cover, less than 20%of the existing woodland (Figure 6). The Landscape Plan provides for boulevard trees along the proposed street and trees and shrubs as entryway landscaping(Appendix F). Protect Wetlands and Augment Buffers The proposed project will not impact existing wetlands and will establish wetland buffers. MCWD management classifications for wetlands on the site range from Manage 1 to Preserve and corresponding wetland buffer width requirements range from 20 to 75 feet. The project will include wetland buffers ranging from 20 to 75 feet wide to meet MCWD buffer requirements (Figure 6,Appendix E). The project will maintain existing vegetation along the shoreline of Long Lake. Long Lake has a recreational development shoreland classification and a structural setback requirement of 75 feet for sewered single family developments like this project. New homes will be at least 200 feet from Long Lake, meeting or exceeding lakeshore setback and impervious surface ratio requirements (Figure 6,Appendix E). The site includes a watercourse (Other aquatic resource 1) that drains from Wetland 2 to Long Lake (Figure 3). The watercourse channel is about three feet wide and it will be contained within a 20-foot-wide easement. The driveway to the home on Lot 3 will cross over the watercourse, include a culvert, and affect about 90 linear feet of the 1,200-foot watercourse (Figure 6,Appendix E). This crossing will need to be permitted under the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Waterbody Crossings and Structures Rule. The crossing will also be eligible for authorization under U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Nationwide Permit 29, which covers effects on up to 300 linear feet of stream bed. These permits will be obtained, and the driveway crossing will not cause the loss of wetlands. The project may require additional approvals to install docks on Long Lake for the three lakeshore lots. These approvals are discussed under the section of this narrative titled Maintain and Protect Positive Views. I 5 Willow Bay Sanctuary Conservation Design Application Justify and Mitigate Impacts to Ecological Communities The site does not include rare or sensitive ecological communities. The project will minimize ecological and water quality impacts to the extent feasible by routing runoff from Willow Bay Court to a stormwater pond. Mitigation will include the stormwater pond, rain gardens, and preservation of approximately 80%of the existing woodland. Maintain Ecological Connections The site does not include natural resource corridors, sensitive plant communities mapped by the Minnesota DNR Biological Survey, natural areas with identified potential for rare species, or sites to consider for proactive management and protection (Figure 5,Appendix B). However, the site includes wetlands, shorelands, and a conceptual greenway corridor mapped by Hennepin County(Appendix B). The conceptual greenway follows the watercourse that drains from Wetland 2 to Long Lake. Much of the greenway will be maintained in its natural condition. A crossing over the watercourse for driveway construction will affect the greenway, but a continuous wooded corridor along the northeast side of the property will maintain the ecological connection. Maintain and Protect Positive Views The nearest collector roadway with positive views is Brown Road N. Other nearby positive views are available from watercraft on Long Lake. The site will have limited visibility from Brown Road N because Brown Road is bordered by a wooded corridor and most of this wooded corridor will be preserved and maintained. Positive views from Long Lake will be maintained and protected by preserving most or all trees near the shoreline. The City of Orono Shoreland Management Ordinance (Article IX, Sec. 78- 1285)prohibits intensive vegetation clearing within 75 feet of the shoreline of Long Lake. It also requires a City permit for removal of any live tree 6 inches or more in diameter that is located within 75 feet of the shoreline. The project will minimize tree removal and comply with these requirements. The site includes an existing dock on Long Lake that is expected to be relocated. In addition, two new docks will be installed for the two additional lakeshore lots. Dock installation may require a small amount of tree removal and vegetation disturbance. Tree removal and aquatic vegetation disturbance could require permits from the City of Orono and the Minnesota DNR. Required permits will be obtained and the new docks are expected to have a minor effect on the views from Long Lake. Preserve or Reinterpret Landmarks The home that currently exists on the site will be preserved and a driveway will be constructed in a new location to access the home. The existing home was constructed in 1987. Given that the home is less than 50 years old and that it has limited visibility from surrounding properties, it would not likely be considered an historic feature or landmark. 6 Willow Bay Sanctuary Conservation Design Application 4. DENSITY BONUS The proposed project has a net density of one residential unit per 2.98 acres. Due to the large lot size,the proposed density is less than one unit per 2.0 acres and a density bonus is not required. 5. LONG-TERM PRESERVATION The proposed stormwater pond will be contained within a drainage and utility easement and wetlands will be contained within buffer zones to ensure their long-term preservation and maintenance. The project area and design do not include other elements known to require long- term protection or maintenance. 7 Willow Bay Sanctuary Conservation Design Application FIGURES 1. Site Location 2. Minnesota Land Cover Classification System 3. Delineated Wetlands and Waters 4. MCWD Wetland Management Classifications 5. Ecologically Significant Areas and Natural Resource Corridors 6. Proposed Plan .. , , 1` SherburneRamo" ey 1-11,1iVia: ,tr O•.� ,..G a o... n c" ama , f.r ., ,. ,Medina Wright' snw ---=•--_--___.—__ ``:n.�........r `" Hennepin Ramsey `"'--------- td lnneapt Its s t _ Ifl❑t.t�n6a �a \ u ( .? Eden Ptdi rle se-..." - y „.,. F - 'v„ McLeod Carver i Dakota .:, 1,�^a.. ...�.. .x ew.•vcu.w.....n...$ ,il j' d ::::-•.':•.-i,-,,',--':.-02- 'b...�SlteLocatron 3 n s; 1, ; Lr at., .t ? t G • �.',,, xeoa .mu P. V . \ ,J ' i .. 1 I [ Long Lake"...,. Long Lake i l { .1r 8 t # -= .T.1.-----,,,'',,,,4,jr-i-7-___"1,_. - - ::',,-s,?.,:,,,,-*:i '� : ,- .„,,,,,,, 10,,,,,,,,,i,i,;::: ,� , r '' ., tr, * Wayzata 1 v} . tom-'°- p,, k .- ; Figure 1 - Site Location N 0 2,000 Willow Bay Sanctuary(KES 2019-012) - 1! I Feet Orono,Minnesota �r_. ,L Note:Boundaries indicated on `u^ KJT u,t this figure are approximate OLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY and do not constitute an + fir Source:ESRI Streets Basemep official survey product. 0 4 OPurled Boundary MLCCS Cover Type nrcerearon-retwe cenduoas rarest Buidings and pavement witlt]690%Impervious cover idin9s and pavement with 9110096 mpery ous cover Leem permanently wooded ¢,e g` Ck omvmgran ' f -�mnetc ocen water A 9 Mapb basswood(Iwest�with 5t]5%"mpen oua cover a# 5,. Map'e Waewaod loreat } 3 1� OaM(lor nt orwmd td�wrth 3650%"mpery ous cover � g zv� !9� � Oak loreat menti subtype 1 -Pavement witlt 91100%inpervaus cover Plentad m sed con lerous/decauous trees w m 36-50%impervaus rover k$ _R nted m sed can IerouLdecamus treea w N 51]5%"mpervaua mver .,.. I I Shod grnanee aM m sed treea w th 3650%mpervaus mver -soon eresnen w,m np.rse vee aver on ppbnd aona • c S Y a F 41.11111,111111 f. Figure 2 -Minnesota Land Cover Classification System N 0 200 Willow Bay Sanctuary(KES 2019-012) ;'!s A I Feet Orono,Minnesota KJ T uATT/r Note:Boundaries indicated on OLLIAUG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY this figure are approximate and do not constitute an M/ Source:MNGEO Spatial Commons official SutVey produet. t ill, £ Wetland 2 li 1x94 acres Other�Aq c1AV , . Resource �- Wetland 3 f 0.36 acres i ",l Wetland 1 1r25 acres - -' - '''''-r,* .4-4r: . .;I'l < kE Wetland 4 3: 1 0767 acres =r I r Long Lake(27 160P) OHW7944.3 fft Figure 3 -Delineated Wetlands and Waters N 0 200 n Project Boundary Willow Bay Sanctuary(KES 2019-012) "? Feet Orono,Minnesota y: Wetland Boundary Note:Boundaries indicated on u T u�rTr' Other Aquatic Resource this figure are approximate 11J�L11tiV IJ ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY and do not constitute an �� Sourrrr MNGEO Spatial Commons,samba[ek Public Waters official survey product. „, ,..„ .. .,.,:.— ,,,,,,,,sw , , ., .. t � ,: 'r. f ,. ' .g„:71,,:` ,v* '4., ' :: ' '* *, . ,,,,,„ ''' - 4.14; 714,?11'''''' I' .r ., ,/ t } ist st R ..ya.. a .,`tF f 4` yl1f 3_ Yom. r.y'. I o. 1� �s` ,¢,p - y �� ', q t ° v,tk ,.' Mir \; 1 t .r a {'°� � ,,.* s jp��'. may..•' ,.t ',i`�.y ,� rte fs "Y! ?irk k. .N , Figure 4 -MCWD Wetland Management Classifications N 0 200 ® Lake Preserve Willow Bay Sanctuary(KES 2019-012) �;'�s, Feet Orono,Minnesota _ MM Manage 1 71111i Upland A4- _..1 Note:Boundaries indicated on u T u�rT Manage 21 Not Classified [his figure are approximate 1 LJO1. LAUD ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY _ w� and do not constitute an ���/ Source:MNCEO Spatial Commons,MCWD ___ Manage 3 official survey product. I It C $b.. t c•.,y ' s y 41 g .. ` . r. �q ,Z. y�f i 4—•,, 11 .. "l� s ' frM #i! .� '�•.fly.t• :I = .. ,' • yi, .44 NIF rd • I ,J Mil ( e:r_ i I .'k. :>., Il a .s- ;i.t {_ 3 I t s '1/4.,.• { '...-.0;)r.#' $ + v l Figure 5 -Ecologically Significant Areas and Natural Resource Corridors N 0 1,000 OProje Boundary Willow Bay Sanctuary(KE S 2019-012) MLCCS Regional Ecolog cal Corridors "% I I Orono,Minnesota �.., Feet ®Prioiay Natural Resource Corndors AA � A. u T u�TT/v MLCCS Regionally Significant Ecological Areas Note:Boundaries indicated on 1 t.JOLIIIIUtJ ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY High Rated Area this dgure are approximate `•••�/�� Liwel Medium Rated Area and do not constitute:cilia, �� Source:MNGEO S anal Commons,MN DNR official survey product. ����� Low Rated Area Fh -,,,;,-.7—`",''''''11.4 .�uia:paeuitcrdie n.tvk ub•rt V$7116'ir41 W i4e. a ;(.^• �ti)1- _'— _'�-7 31i,io�.�� S8 i7dt E 0.53 e T '+ar / - '" i `¢° Wetland 2 ;';- ',1. t� a `�., + 1.94 acres, _. y� 5., y .�,.,.�\ tr Other Aquatic , ® ` fl q I: :d Reso`urce`�1 . , 1.(y) ; VA A\\N, - );*4,..'''';'-,. 'if, ;- ' .' . E �Ste" t3#5�,,,,,-,.:2;‘,N.-0-;f^+`f . moi^ 'Y�+ � .x. 5 l dd • I . #t / « � IP i Wetland 3 ;.,.`ry . i r #a � `\ �:., t Y , § �e t ,i 0.36 acres 7 ` . vlo- — .7 v� = , tom:l nt ,- �. h r ,„” " ft r te , 44 FNi '4114 t k :° ..; Wetland 1 .t; t. 1 a r�" 1.25 acres lam. .,:. L 'tl t 5:.. 0.07,acres : /r`/ II= :::::.::::::•::::.: �G� If-( h, , j , ""¢ Long Lake(27-1'it , �—r�4 .-l �';� ..:1-m!„ OHW:944 33 ft' • � e ��r ' x Figure 6 -Proposed Plan N 0 200 Willow Bay Sanctuary(KES 2019-(12) it Feet =Project Boundary Estimated Woodland Removal Orono,Minnesota Q/- Wetland Boundary ®Wetland Butter Note:Boundaries indicated on t Gratling Limits Tree Cover 'j(' r u,t T r�r this figure are approximate IJOI_ lAUG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY t ,/ Other Aquatic Resource ,-,..1 Public Waters and d0❑Ot constitute ali ���� Sourcc:MNGEO Spatial Commons,Gronberg Associates,Sambatek Stormv2ler Pond-Rain Garden official Survey product. Willow Bay Sanctuary Conservation Design Application APPENDIX A Rural Oasis Study Corridor Photographs • Conservation Design Application Rural Oasis Study Corridor Photographs 9R o.,,' a ¢ i �.k� +.7� i � •� "`.� �' ro: 3 r n• � TMs;f ,A 4" w:J --. n't y om �� "a � 6` mea,-..",s.,..,,,, . ✓ I • — .r- gt% - - S I ' L3 n .. .kt,, �, . x View from Brown Road N, looking north (from Google Street View) y, Ar i w g .,,'ti. a�P - f+�. • _ _t. , - -..,f, ,-,4,14-,. N\' x ..fit' Aor } _ • x _ $ View from Brown Road N, looking south (from Google Street View) Willow Bay Sanctuary Conservation Design Application APPENDIX B Minnesota Land Cover Classification System Land Cover Classification - Level 1 City of Orono Land Cover Classification and Natural Resources Inventory (e.,,. , i„., __. Allk r ` 4,10 t a g �` �, 4 0" P,--- re, .01k7",,PR 4 -4(1°‘' *- trikimk!o; LI- 4 '''. ill , 'ii.) K"ff c, '''''-'''', ir, , Nerr S '� r Illok .� r.. Willow Bay z, .'f � ' u :' �r. -14, 0 . •').- �-; Sanctuary ,a r`' `t 1 *ft. : y< �, 4 t, A( .. "r ,;.411K-1,,N.4-,1"-;:, � ;�-at�' ,6„,''?"11,1t.,,,. '�.����� i ;..111 <1..''::,'6p.6, '''.6.-.,' '.''s ,,..6 jai I/4 :alto- , . .. 1217 6'''''' ik €t; ,&. ,l. w , A ieg i l Legend Q City Boundary -40000 Woodland MN 50000 Shrubland Land Cover Classification-Level 1 60000 Herbacous 11 No Land Cover Classification data fa this area ®70000 Nonvascular 0 2,250 4,500 5,000 10000 Artificial Surfaces and Associated Areas 11.1 80000 Sparse Vegetation l I Feet 20000 Planted or Cultivated Vegetation I inch equals 4,500 feet ege �90000 Water IMO 30000 Forests Figure 6 City of Orono–Land Cover Classification and Natural Resource Inventory 19 March 2006 Land Cover Classification - Level 3 City of Orono Land Cover Classification and Natural Resources Inventory 'v-17,11v.:.•,..:`44111 ..il 1 'IIILr t�. .r fi ' .rj`Ill.J1A'% I 11-i/. `1�r ` ',�T F ,si►,:4:,,o-F70,1,1–r ♦ "�i r a')t'-y .�,14-.9.''.1-.'�1'1.1 �P":11101117;,,"?-i.( LL ,tl i � -. I.. .+- .,ice .411i J 1f �� `Np 11'7 r f BMJ Sl� i:y�Jf .,.a '' l'c fid, ,,lig, 1} > 1._i,. .?x 1 1:; k-r.Z • w.o`' t.. tP ylr t3�tr wry �. .:, � �r t.a' '� T e- �riirr1.. filar«/��,,. i `. S.., �' t w•1 .ln it 7 y grn�l'� IP i� ,.. ,. 4. ,� 1 r 17. /4 6,.... .i r' • w L Ei l y-'f74R��{47 T��11"1117;rei 4. � fir _ .Y, ril."'�� ,�s Ire i, � .�;! a ,G � ..> `�1 ,, ':r ` vl ,. Sanctuary �J ifiiiibs ; �� #,qtr +^�iiii: � . 4:/s •'�, r �j,}�, s r� ,:..,r'T x "11,n� ��Q`7-4111 Vit_ It . 1�.y1 , t y7 1,. i ,ice . fit ill . � .we, !r c 1 `+ ��vTr�.4 r?:i: 1r :y7 ca 10,.., dr(' j y 04 R. .......,'Ili iik\ it III 4 i\ WI.> ti. .. .,4; ii ':(..,00-.7--1 J jp, itii,,, I . ...:-,-; v'1 . .417,70 Legend i" C:',1 City Boundary I=40000 Woodland IIIIII 50000 Shrubland 'Color Categories for Level 3 Land Cover Classification r-160000 Herbacous NE 70000 Nonvascular 0 2,250 4,500 9,000 t I Feet =..i 10000 Artificial Surfaces and Associated Areas -80000 Sparse Vegetation 1 inch equals 4,500 feet =20000 Planted or Cultivated Vegetation -90000 Water 30000 Forests "Complete Level 3 Legend on next page. Figure 7 City of Orono–Land Cover Classification and Natural Resource Inventory 20 March 2006 Legend for Level 3 Land Cover Classification 1P0a Art Wel Surfaces I AEERCWL SURFACES WITH(XNFEEa1S TREES I I W11FX:WL SURFACES WITH CEGDJOUS TIES I ARSE/COL SURFACES WITH MIXED CONE>SOUS AND DECIDUOUS TREES AR'RRCWL SURFACES WITH CONFER ILE ARDOR DECIDUOUS SHRUBS AM)SPARSE TREES ARTIFICWL SURFACES WITH PERENNIAL GRASSES WITH SPARSE TREES .AEOEFICWL SURFAOESWITH PERENNIAL GRASSES _ APT FOOL SURFACES WITH.CULDVATE)RJs'1BACEDUS VEOE1ATICN TgeglmsI _ BUILDNGSANOESRFAVEMEYr _ ART MALSURFACES-WITH QJLTIYATCO HE ISAcEOU3VEEETATION Minims) 20300:Whaled'Vegettl:No I PLAN,MAIN N3)OR CULTIVATE)CONIFEROUS TRS (-. . I PLANTED,MAINTAINED ORCJLTAdMED DG)UOUE TRF4R - EtANTED,MANTA NEO OR CULT ATE)MIXED MINI FERGUSAND CERCDUOUSTRBS PLANTED;AISRIA NED OR CLILTIYATE1 CONIFEROUS SHRJBS _ RANTED,MANTA NED I3R CULTIVATED DECIDUOUS 5HRUBNHEVEGETAIDN fndideg aenas's; mom OR 0.M.MJTAINED GRASSES W t+H SPARSE TREE COVER I_ FLAMES OR MAWTAINED GRASSES - RANTED OR MAINTAINER GRASSE.AMD FORE'S WLTIVATRD ROW CROPLAND _ PLANTED OR MAINTAINER GRASSES 3COM Forest SAT+IRATED CCRIPEiRWE FOREST IPUVND DECIDUOUS FOREST TEWORPRLV FLOODED DECIDUOUS FOREST _ 54'1:RATED DECIDUOUS FOREST _ SFAsONALLYFtDoiEDDEODUO.S FOREST Q000:WOomard I LFLAND DECIDUOUS WOODLAND - LPLAND MIXED DEOIDIOUS-CONIFtniUE WODDIAND 50003:SF:A:DarsT I LP{AND DERIDUOuSSIWUBLAND TEMPORARILY FLOODED EODIOUS SIM/BLAND _ SATURATED DE CIDUCItSSHRUEAND _ SEASONALLY FLOODED DECIDUOUSSHRUELAND 50003:HFerbeceous I I TALL MAW iEREACEOUSVEGETATCN I I ASIAIM TALL IIFW4O HGEBACECL.S r^� TEARORARILY FI EO HEABFTSCIUS VEGETATION f..... I SA"URATE3 NEM:NOEAs VEGETATION FLOWED 1191EAWDUSVEGET T:ON I I SEMIFEF AANENTLY-LOWEDtERBACEDUS-VEGETATION INTEEA4A17EHTIY EXPOSED FEESACEDUS VEGETATION r�...1 PERMANENTLY FLOODED HERBADEOUS VEGErATI ON _ BRASSARD WITH SPARSE DEODUOUS TEES _ GRASS.AWD WITH SP ARSE CONIEEROLS OR MIX'cD CON IFDiOUSIDEDDUOUSTRESS= _ GRASSLAND WITH SPARSE CEODUOUS TREES-TB ORAFxP_Y FLOODED' MIN SPARSE VEC-EFATICN 50001 W 0W MN SLOW MOVRYG LINEAR OPEN WATER L'METTC OPEN WATER _ PERMANENTLY FLOODED LITTORAL AQUATIC BED ED 111111 LITTORAL OPEN WATER _ INTERN 7TENTLY EXPOSED LIT-ORAL AQUATIC RED I- PERMANENTLY FLOODED LETIORALAIaUATIO BED FALUSTEINE OPEN WATER City of Orono—Land Cover Classification and Natural Resource Inventory 21 March 2006 Natural Areas and Communitiy ID Numbers Legend City of Orono Land Cover Classification and Natural Resources Inventory QCiry Boundary Natural Communiy Type it"t s, r'-e` t 6 -y I•I Tamarack swamp a ss r t ,7- 6 5- ' a q;q �2 Tamarack swamp minerotrophic subtype s, 4--,1:43.; ry e a , tr 4 3 Oak forest b ® fore.4 Oak foremesio subtype ,Ye bier til a tits s c a+ cbri a �5 Oak Purest dry subtype t +," t MI 6 Maple-basswood forest to r t t. a'pte ' a t'mei 7Aspen forest l l a �Ili8 Floodplain forest 9 lowland hardwood forest sf ✓M int+ Nil 10 Black ash swamp sn2,q „ Men Mixed hardwood swamp Willow Bay r '.':12Asper,forest-suraledsots g ' ta ag t� r ., . ."1 o Sanctuary ' '- MI a 13 Black ash swamp-seasonallyfboded e• a+ ,s `r 14 Muted hardwood swamp-seasonally flooded p. in 15 Upland mined corderousdedduous forest u s 9q. n 1 c &,0144 NO 16 Oak woodandbrushland s IL' - , r afy Lm;Y.17 Na6+e dominated temporanly flooded shrublena a 18 Poor fen shrub subtype ^`3� • ' 11 19 Rid,fen ahmb subtype . X,. a,C '" a an 20 Shrub swamp seepage subtype t91'91.:.' F s �'+ y III 21 Bird,bop,spiroea staubbndsaturated sols 4 S I22 Alder swanp de e + q° all 23 Wet meadow shrub subtype �s •' no yy �1,s c t 24 Willow swamp c ' . 25 Meso prone 2fi Wd meadow •' 27Poorfen sedge subtype X28 Rich ten s „ 29 Rich fen sedge subtype , MI30 Cattail marsh-seasonaly hooded X31 Mixed emergent marsh-seasonally flooded gm32 Wet meadow-seasonally flooded w, NI 33 Cattail marsh-semipar nanenlly flooded sit I®34 Mood emergent marsh S. q+ X35 Wet meadow-eampem,ar,er,lly Flooded 36 Cattail marsh-intermittently epsoaed r ori. a, I=37 Cattail marsh-permanently flooded A4' MI 38 Water 6y open marsh j-. 0 e NI39 Lonnetic open water r- „ "'al atEa 40 Pemunen8y aoudad aquatic bed 4 1111.41 Paktstrina open water » Srµ 0 1,600 0200 6.400 as I hequwas.20oreer Figure City of 0m00-land Cover Classification and Natural Resource Inventory 23 March 2006 County Biological Survey Sites City of Orono Land Cover Classification 0 2 25 4,500 s,000 and Natural Resources Inventory (Feet 1 inch equals 4500 feet • Willow Bay Sanctuary ///2 (klir Legend OCty Boundary Cnurny Blosgica)Suyey.Natural Cornminnes OAK FOREST ,j ASPEN FOREST -OAK WOODLAND-BRUS4WdD(BIG WOODS) CBS BindiuersAy RaoN g forOdrar Saes Q ASPEN WOODLAND -POOR FEN SEDGE SUBTYPE JUTSTANDING LD BLACK ASH SWAMP -RED OAK-SUGAR MAPLE-BASSWOOD-(BI a I ERMNT HICFORYI FOREST HIGH Q CATTAIL MARSH -RICH FEN(TRANSITION) MODERATE O DRY OAK SAVANNA -RICH FEN(TRANSITION)SHRUB SUBTYPE BELOW MINIMUM DIVERSITY STANDARDS B=1DRf'PRAIWE I SEDGE MEADOW -EMERGENT MARSH SEEPAGE.MEADOW(SOUTHERN) FLOODPLAIN FOREST -SHRUB SWAMP (=)HARDWOOD SWAMP FOREST -SEVER MAPLE-(VIRGINIA CREEPER)FLOOLPLAW FOREST O LOWLAND HARDWOOD FOREST -SEVER MAPLE-GREEN ASH-COTTONWOOD TERRACE FOREST MAPLE-BASSWO©D FOREST(BIG WOODS( -SUGAR MAPLE FOREST WIG WOODS) -MESIC HARDWOOD FOREST bib ItM -TAMARACK SWAMP -MESIC OAK SAVANNA(CENTRAL) WET MEADOW MESIC PRARIE ®WILLOW-DOGWOOD SHRUB SWAMP • M5)IEO EMERGENTMAWAIt/FOREST) -WELOW SWAMP Figure 5 MIXED HARDWOOD SWAMP City of Orono—Land Cover Classification and Natural Resource Inventory 9 March 2006 Cance u i,y `" Concept-dal Greenway d4ii dor Alignment • • . _ ', I°; City of Orono Land Cover Oiass�cationantd NaturaiResources Inventory >= "' , -= 17, - If . J . H� k. #� 'g'i� i . t'K+ A``;;�. - .4�, / i ;AM r ,' ;.-i -.T{ -Lr • � u ...,-,c,,itijr . ....., ,. ..... ..,..-„.„ : ..„„,,,-, . —.....,, , , i:i r ., t , ,:.- ,�. ,'='* 1.-7 ''` Willow Bay s i'= �-- -_: Sanctuary I f.> -, lint ., '' .d , r "., - � {. . .! r.` .di p, _ .`a g.f - �: �1.::-�r'��r ,may.." r '...^'•- 'r`�"' .�,1 'f=�' , _ r ... .. . ... Y,1- . ';,. Fes. _ • •• d • • ' ,�Y u 1 T r' • I._,40 _ , i.t f. a' '''. — • - - - • ' - . . " : . . . . • • • .. • J.\i i cr J7 U r(6�7, Y • Legend Hen Q City Boundary i I Steep Slope Soils nePrn[aunty Deoterton.tDNR Scientific and Natural Areas oI. r- �`r 5"k" Regional Parks Natural Community Quality Conceptual Greenway:Conidor HigtiQirality Adjacent Greenwaycarridoirs Medium Quality 0 2,250 4,500 9,000 Other Natural and Senii-.i co► rntir itles Feet Streams 1 inch equals 4,500 feet existing Wetlands 100 Year Floodplain Figure 9 City of Orono—Land Cover Classification and Natural Resource Inventory 23 March 2006 Willow Bay Sanctuary Conservation Design Application APPENDIX C Tree Survey, Topography, and Existing Drainage Map -= ; oil:g 121rx_.7. A w 2 Zlif CONDITIONS AND TREE o,90 cain EWxisliTITNLGOW BAY SANCTiNVEANTROYRY .e05, 0-',- reic, wwdr, igi2....., 0 1 ,,-4.-1,-,- -,-- --,----.-----,------------ --„,----______ _ __ _ ___ _.,, -- - _ _A*3177, --m--- vq,V , h--- _---7,--..t•---;---i-%t . - i,--•-• ii-1..,.. tga- , 1,i % .'.,,,, ,s, 1 1 i ' • ' -..k, I -111 :r.:!.. -:— 'ii..r,, Eliff- ,,..:-{ il ,\'` r r;, 1 `7—••••74'r , /r r rs,‘r _ , —,,_:-- \ '11 i r s ''' r 4 ' '''—',r, -7.• r s‘‘,‘ 4 ...›,,-_,-,- -, 7A .,„ \ ,,, \Jo :r4...... = :=. .,,:i...... .,s,,,...,:. :,....„.. rOr•rjr-'. :;.1—,:— Irvr. II"t ,'" ,,,Rip /„---- ----=I-- , I " \ __---- , 1. - I ' 111"^ Si/• • '1,-- '''''' l'i 'Ll I 1 '1!‘ -- -.II- ( .4:::,f,f,. 40V -, itii I AL l h,/ ' ' ' ' "''-4-.4--4.'- ' , / ' , - aV• i / --->RUNOFF DRAINAGE DIRECTION aiN 1 ----; — ..------„ :,,:, s - . t -,:-••') -- __J,-.. - IN i 1 -------Tr-. v;...,, N.•-/ , L ' zy HI t • p h Iiii 3 •,';',•" 1- ,•.__ . „..1.'t, , )... '-',i. IIII III - _-v,. fII:o.-Es'•---7-I-I'.--- , 1‘II///,,.., -'----z--..-.- I ...- s8''2''''---10.4 l' 1 _____--------------- ...^........"`''''.." 400 ror.a.....N3,.. Q' 0 100 200 -- — h."....1........ Ill SCALE IN FEET ,... Willow Bay Sanctuary Conservation Design Application APPENDIX D Wetlands Delineation Report Excerpt :*-Sambatek Engineering I Surveying I Planning I Environmental July 7, 2016 Eric Larson 983 Nine Mile Cove East Hopkins, MN 55343 SUBJECT: Wetland Delineation Report 690 N Brown Road Orono, MN 55356 Dear Mr. Larson, Sambatek has prepared this wetland delineation report for the subject property located at 690 N Brown Road, City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota.Also included in this report is wetland permitting documentation to assist you in complying with the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act(WCA)and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. The subject property is comprised of one lot and is approximately 23 acres consisting of a residence, unimproved woodland,wetlands,and grass fields.The subject property exhibits a rolling topography and is bordered by N Brown Road to the west, Long Lake to the east,and residential developments to the north and south. WETLAND DELINEATION METHODOLOGY Sambatek reviewed the available background wetland information of this site as a part of the wetland delineation activities,which included: ➢ Hennepin County Soil Survey; ➢ National Wetlands Inventory Map (East Central Update); ➢ DNR Public Waters Map; ➢ Topographic Map;and, ➢ Precipitation Data. Hennepin County Soil Survey The Hennepin County Soil Surveywas utilized to identify areas of mapped hydric soils within the property boundaries.Hydric soil is an indicator of potential wetland conditions.The soil survey identifies twelve soil types within the Project Site.These soil types are summarized below in Table 1. 12800 Whitewater Drive. Suite 300, Minnetonka. MN 55343 1763.476.6010 2401 46th Avenue Southeast.Suite 202, Mandan, ND 58554 701.204.6845 sambatek.com Eric Larson July 7,2016 Page 2 Table 1.Summary of Mapped Soils within the Project Site Map Unit Map Unit Name Hydric Soil Hydric Soil Rating Drainage Symbol Rating(%) Classification L16A Muskego,Blue Earth,and Houghton soils, 100 All hydric Very poorly drained ponded,0-1%slopes L22C2 Lester loam,6-10%slopes,moderately 2 Predominantly non-hydric Well drained eroded L22D2 Lester loam 10-16%slopes,moderately 0 Not hydric Well drained eroded L24A Glencoe clay loam,0-1%slopes 100 All hydric Very poorly drained L36A Hamel,overwash-Hamel complex,0-3% 45 Partially hydric Somewhat poorly drained slopes L37B Angus loam,2-63%slopes 5 Predominantly non-hydric Well drained L41C2 Lester Kilkenny complex,6-12%slopes, 5 Predominantly non-hydric Moderately well drained eroded L41E Lester-Kilkenny complex,18-5%slopes 5 Predominantly non-hydric Well drained L44A Nessel loam,1-3%slopes 10 Predominantly non-hydric Moderately well drained L49A Klossner soils,depressional,0-1%slopes 100 All hydric Very poorly drained L132A Hamel-Glencoe complex,0-2%slopes 90 Predominantly hydric Poorly drained U1A Urban land-Udorthents,wet substratum, 0 Not hydric N/A complex,0-2%slopes National Wetland Inventory NWI maps are utilized as an off-site tool in identifying areas of potential wetlands.The most current, East Central update, mapping was used for this portion of the delineation.The NWI map for the project site identifies two potential wetlands within the Project Site. These NWI wetlands are summarized in Table 2. Table 2.Summary of NWI Wetlands within the Project Limits Cowardin Location Classification Delineated Wetland North Central Portion of Project Area PEM1A Wetland 2 and 3 Along Eastern Property Boundary PEM1C/L2ABH Wetland 1 DNR Public Waters DNR Public Waters are waterbodies which meet the definition of Minnesota Statue 103G.005, Subdivision 15 and are regulated by the DNR.The DNR Public Waters Map for Hennepin County identifies two DNR Public Waters within the Project Area. One public water, located along the eastern property boundary is listed as Long Lake (#160P)and has a DNR established ordinary high water level of 944.3 feet. The second DNR Public Water is an unnamed watercourse which through the north central portion of the property to Long Lake. • I . •. - • Eric Larson July 7,2016 Page 3 Topography Map Two foot contours were downloaded from the Minnesota DNR's MNTopo Viewer website was and utilized to approximate water flow patterns and identify potential depressional areas.The topographic map indicates that the Project Site is gently rolling with a decrease in elevation between the west property boundary and the residence and another decrease in elevation east of the residence to Long Lake. Precipitation Data Analysis of precipitation data pertinent to the project area is important to understand the wetland hydrology indicators observed during the field work activities. Precipitation data was obtained from the Minnesota State Climatology Office webpage,which provides "synthetic"data for a chosen project location.The synthetic data are made up of regularly-spaced grid nodes whose values were calculated using data interpolated from Minnesota's precipitation data base.Normal precipitation is based on the 30-year average for the period of 1981-2010.Non-normal precipitation is considered to be that below the 30th percentile(drier than normal)and above the 70th percentile(wetter than normal).Table 3 summarizes the precipitation data for the past 12 months(July 2015 -June 2016). In addition, the table provides a comparison of the actual precipitation compared to the 30-year average (1981-2010). Sambatek also utilized the NRCS Method to determine the hydrologic conditions during the three month period prior to the site visit. Table 3.Precipitation Data for The Subject Property 30-Year Average Actual Difference Month/Year (Inches) (Inches) (Inches) July 2015 3.97 7.27 +3.30 August 2015 4.11 3.04 -1.07 September 2015 3.41 3.76 +0.35 October 2015 2.39 2.85 +0.46 November 2015 1.68 3.91 +2.23 December 2015 1.15 1.67 +0.52 January 2016 0.82 0.33 -0.49 February 2016 0.79 1.02 +0.23 March 2016 1.73 1.14 -0.59 NRCS Method Condition April 2016 2.56 3.39 +0.83 Wet May 2016 3.46 2.13 -1.33 Dry June 2016 4.38 2.01 -2.37 Dry Total 30.45 32.52 +2.07 Dry(8) ••• - I • • 1 • a • S •. - • Eric Larson July 7,2016 Page 4 According to the recorded precipitation amounts for the project area was experiencing 2.07 inches more precipitation than the 30 year average for the past twelve months. However, using the NRCS Method the site was experiencing drier than normal conditions at the time of the July 2016 site visit. According to the National Weather Service Station in New Hope approximately two inches of rain were received the night before the field visit. Field Delineation The delineation of wetlands within the subject property consisted of a review of published resources and a site delineation of wetlands per the"three-parameter" (Level 2)methodology set forth in The 1987Manualand the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual:Midwest Region(hereafter, The Regional Supplement)(U.S.Army Corps of Engineers,Version 2.0,August 2010). The wetland boundaries were staked with pink"Wetland Boundary"pinflags.Sambatek utilized a Trimble Geoexplorer 6000 GPS unit to locate the wetland boundaries.The surveyed wetland boundaries are illustrated on the Wetland Delineation Map figure. Future site plans should include the surveyed wetland boundaries to ensure that proper measures are taken to avoid, minimize,or mitigate potential wetland impacts. BASIN CHARACTERISTICS Four wetlands were identified and staked during the July 6, 2016 site visit.Table 4 and the following paragraphs provide a summary of the wetland basins identified and delineated by Sambatek. Table 4.Wetland Type and Size Wetland Community Approximate Area Approximate :v anaae Wetland Classification Type within Project Site within Project ' (acres)* (square feet)". 1 PEM1A/C 1/3 Seasonally Flooded 1.25" 54,450 Manage 1 Basin/Shallow Marsh 2 PEM1B 2 Fresh (wet)Meadow 1.94` 84,506 Manage 2 3 PEM1A 1 Seasonally Flooded 0.36 15,682 Manage 2 Basin 4 PEM1A 1 Seasonally Flooded 0.07 3,049 Manage 3 Basin "represents area within the Project Site Wetland 1 is classified as a Palustrine (P-)type wetland exhibiting Emergent(-EM-) vegetation and a Temporary Flooded (-A-)and Seasonally Flooded (-C-) moisture regimes or a Type 1/3 (PEM1A/C)wetland complex. According to the Hennepin County Soil Survey,Wetland 1 is mapped as Muskego, Blue Earth,and Houghton soils (L16A),and Glencoe clay loam (L24A). The NWI map identifies Wetland 1 as a Type 3/5 (PEM1C/L2ABH)wetland complex.The DNR Public Waters Map for Hennepin County identifies Wetland 1 as Long Lake. • S . D • . . - a Eric Larson July 7,2016 Page 5 Wetland 1 encompasses approximately 1.25 acres of the Project Site and extends onto the adjacent properties to the north and south.This wetland appears to be supported by surface water from the surrounding slopes to the west and north. An unnamed DNR Public Watercourse runs through the north portion of Wetland 1. Two transects,consisting of two sample locations,were established along the boundary of Wetland 1 where the topography, dominant vegetation,the soil profile and wetland hydrologic indicators were observed and noted at each sample location. Data collected from the sample locations are presented in the Field Data Sheets (SP1-1 WET, SP1-1 UP, SP1-2 WET,SP1-2 UP),which are included with this report. A majority of Wetland 1 exhibits emergent vegetation dominated by Cattail(OBL)and Reed Canary Grass(FACW). The wetland boundary was placed at the transition from Reed Canary Grass (FACW)to Smooth Brome (FACU), Kentucky Bluegrass (FAC), Ground Ivy(FACU),and Virginia Creeper(FACU). Wetland 2 is classified as a Palustrine(P-)type wetland exhibiting Emergent(-EM-) vegetation and a Saturated (-B-)moisture regime or a Type 2 (PEM1B)wetland.According to the Hennepin County Soil Survey,Wetland 2 is mapped as Hamel-Glencoe complex (L132A),and Klossner soils(L49A). The NWI map identifies Wetland 2 as a Type 1 (PEM1A)wetland.The DNR Public Waters Map for Hennepin County does not identify Wetland 2. Wetland 2 encompasses approximately 1.94 acres of the Project Site and extends onto the adjacent properties to the north.This wetland appears to be supported by surface water from the surrounding slopes to the south,east, and west. An unnamed DNR Public Watercourse flows through Wetland 2 and floods the wetland during large precipitation events. One transect,consisting of two sample locations,was established along the boundary of Wetland 2 where the topography, dominant vegetation,the soil profile and wetland hydrologic indicators were observed and noted at each sample location. Data collected from the sample locations are presented in the Field Data Sheets (SP2-1 WET, SP2-1 UP),which are included with this report. A majority of Wetland 2 exhibits emergent vegetation dominated by Reed Canary Grass (FACW),which transitions to Jewelweed (FACW), Green Ash (FACW),and Common Buckthorn (FAC)in wooded areas.The wetland boundary was placed at the transition from Reed Canary Grass(FACW)to Smooth Brome (FACU),Canada Goldenrod (FACU), and Ground Ivy(FACU). Wetland 3 is classified as a Palustrine (P-)type wetland exhibiting Emergent(-EM-)vegetation and a Temporary Flooded (-A-)moisture regime or a Type 1 (PEM1A)wetland.According to the Hennepin County Soil Survey, Wetland 3 is mapped as Hamel-Glencoe complex (L132A),and Klossner soils (L49A). The NWI identifies Wetland 3 as a Type 1 (PEM1A)wetland.The DNR Public Waters Map for Hennepin County does not identify Wetland 3. . • I •• - • • Eric Larson July 7,2016 Page 6 Wetland 3 encompasses approximately 0.36 acres of the Project Site.This wetland appears to be supported by surface water from the surrounding slopes to the north and south. One transect,consisting of two sample locations,was established along the boundary of Wetland 3 where the topography,dominant vegetation,the soil profile and wetland hydrologic indicators were observed and noted at each sample location. Data collected from the sample locations are presented in the Field Data Sheets (SP3-1 WET, SP3-1 UP),which are included with this report. A majority of Wetland 3 exhibits emergent vegetation dominated by Reed Canary Grass (FACW).The wetland boundary was placed at the transition from Reed Canary Grass (FACW)to Smooth Brome(FACU),Canada Goldenrod (FACU), Prairie Fleabane (FACU), and Canada Thistle (FACU). Wetland 4 is classified as a Palustrine (P-)type wetland exhibiting Emergent(-EM-) vegetation and a Temporary Flooded (-A-)moisture regime or a Type 1 (PEM1A)wetland.According to the Hennepin County Soil Survey, Wetland 4 is mapped as Lester loam (L22C2),and Hamel-Glencoe complex(L132A). The NWI and DNR Public Water maps do not identify Wetland 4. Wetland 4 encompasses approximately 0.07 acres of the Project Site along the residential driveway.This wetland appears to be supported by surface water from the surrounding slopes to the south,west,and east. One transect,consisting of two sample locations,was established along the boundary of Wetland 4 where the topography,dominant vegetation,the soil profile and wetland hydrologic indicators were observed and noted at each sample location. Data collected from the sample locations are presented in the Field Data Sheets (SP4-1 WET,SP4-1 UP),which are included with this report. A majority of Wetland 4 exhibits emergent vegetation dominated by Reed Canary Grass (FACW).The wetland boundary was placed at the transition from Reed Canary Grass(FACW)to Smooth Brome (FACU), Kentucky Bluegrass(FAC),Ground Ivy(FACU),and Common Burdock(FACU). OTHER AOUATIC RESOURCES Other Aquatic Resources (OAR)are identified as lakes, rivers,and streams that are regulated waterbodies, but do not meet the definition of a wetland per The 1987 Manualand regional supplements.One OAR(OAR 1)was identified within the project corridor. OAR1 is an Unnamed DNR Public Watercourse which flows through the project corridor from the north central boundary to Long Lake.This watercourse appears to have seasonal flows supplied from runoff from the surrounding slopes.Along the east half of the watercourse the bank height is approximately two feet high,and the stream is approximately three feet wide. The water depth in the channel ranged from one to 4 inches during the July 6, 2016 field visit.The main channel of OAR 1 becomes less discernible where OAR 1 meets Wetland 2.Within Wetland 2 the stream appears to consist of a network of smaller stream channels,which all eventually flow the main channel observed east of Wetland 2. I s s • - i. ' • Eric Larson July 7,2016 Page 7 Wetland Jurisdiction Clean Water Act, Section 404 The U.S.Army Corps of Engineers(COE)regulates dredge and fill activities in navigable waters,wetlands adjacent,tributary,or with significant nexus to navigable waters and isolated wetlands important to interstate commerce. Based on the USGS topography map and observations made during the site visit,Wetland 1 and 2 appear to be connected to waters of the U.S. Sambatek recommends that a copy of this report be submitted to the COE for an official COE jurisdiction determination. In most cases, if the proposed impacts are less than 400 square feet,the COE does not require notification of the project. If the proposed impacts are between 400 square feet and 2.0 acres,the COE requires notification and approval(letter of permission)prior to beginning the project. If the wetland impacts occur in or adjacent to "special waters"and/or exceed 10,000 square feet,the COE review will include a 30-day public/interagency notice. If the proposed impacts exceed the WCA de minimislimits,the COE will require mitigation for the full amount of the impacts regardless of the WCA exemption. If more than three acres of wetland impacts are proposed,an individual permit will automatically be required which includes sequencing (proving there are no alternatives), review by other environmental agencies,a public comment period,and compensatory mitigation. Minnesota Protected Waters Act The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources(DNR)has jurisdiction over waters of the state that are generally wetland Types 3,4,and 5,and are larger than 2.5 acres in incorporated areas or 10 acres in unincorporated areas.The DNR also regulates activities in some rivers and streams and any tributaries to DNR designated trout streams.The DNR has jurisdiction over areas below the Ordinary High Water level(OHW).The OHW for a lake or wetland is determined by the DNR as the elevation at which the vegetation changes from aquatic to terrestrial.For a watercourse,the OHW is the average elevation of the top of the channel banks at any given location. The DNR Public Waters map for Hennepin County identifies Long Lake,along the east boundary of the property, as a DNR Public Water.The DNR has established an OHW of 944.3 feet for Long Lake.The DNR regulates most activities below the OHW and can authorize some activities such as stormwater outfall and sand blankets, but the DNR should be contacted regarding the limits of such projects. The DNR contact for this project is Leslie Parris(651)259-5738. Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act(WCA) A Local Government Unit(LGU)will have jurisdiction over the wetland on the site, based on the WCA as amended through 2013.The LGU for this site is the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District(Katherine Sylvia, (952) 473-2855). :Is Is 1 I1 - Eric Larson July 7,2016 Page 8 The WCA regulates impacts (filling or draining)to wetlands within the State of Minnesota.All land development projects within the state are required to demonstrate avoidance and minimization of wetland impacts. Replacement(mitigation)of unavoidable wetland impacts is required.The location of the replacement wetland(s)shall be based on the wetland replacement sequencing process of the WCA.Off-site wetland mitigation through the purchase of wetland bank credits is the preferred method in replacing wetland impacts. Off-site mitigation should be provided as close to the project site as possible. If the site plans include wetland impacts,which exceed the de minimis exemption limits,a WCA permit will be required from the LGU. Under the WCA rules,an applicant must demonstrate that wetland impacts have been avoided and unavoidable impacts minimized before the activity would be permitted.These rules also require a minimum of 2:1 mitigation ratio for filling or draining in any wetland, or excavation in semi permanently to permanently flooded wetlands.The mitigation ratio may increase to 2.5:1 if wetland replacement is not provided in-place or in-kind. Projects with project-specific wetland mitigation must also develop a 5-year monitoring plan to determine if the mitigation plan is successful.Permanent deed restrictions are required over the project- specific wetland mitigation area(s). If you have any questions or need additional information,please feel free to contact me at(763)476-6010. Sambatek appreciates the opportunity to provide you with our wetland services.If you have any additional needs for our services for this or other projects in the future,please give us a call. Sincerely, Sambatek fe},hz_s_ Jessica Abernathy Environmental Scientist List of Attachments Location Map Topography Map Hennepin County Soil Survey Map NWI Map DNR Public Waters Map Wetland Delineation Map Field Data Sheets Photo Log Minnesota Joint Application Form MNRAM 12800 Whitewater Drive,Suite 300,Minnetonka,MN 55343 1763.476.6010 2401 46th Avenue Southeast,Suite 202,Mandan,ND 58554 1701.204.6845 sambatel.cam yJ. yt r4 'r '� :' 3 .. _ ' . _ e . is I, TYY C r a. i. b.+h.M�r., ,* R7 SYfk ._„ , •"fir: '-7,- 1 7 '^ w: ,,_ ; k , .,.. , �e'1°xG , '+�Y;C .ill's 1 ' ;�'' fX .. - Dickeys FA j� ° v .' ; ( Y _ 4 Subject Property _ j' • s4.. 2r 4, ' t "t 44,t,:is 4,t,„.7 .114. ,'r N. ildIG .. f ._ -' - ";'spip 1_ ._____ , z y , e ;i rid, { :i _ • . ,.., ., .',..,„„t , , - • ..,, , • ....., . ... . .. . .. p ' . . ... . ' '''', • F,.' ' t .. Ru, b t M w.811`'. Lege t ` d -,.t 1. :[ Ga oo- o ma pm,IZaL6coeriStreet ap 0nt�ribute,R ".14 Sambatek x Location Map WAproximate Project Boundary L This map was created using Sambatek's Geographic JG Information Systems(GIS),it is a compilation of 690 Brown Road information and data from v ous sources.This S map is not a surveyed or legally recorded map o Wo t.0:1)! Orono,MN and is intended to be used as a reference. Sambatek is not respon ny inaccu vanes Scale In Fent contained herein. Sources:MetroGIS,NRCS,LMIC r' f 4 it � '"';:,i-t-74•47"$".--4•;":4: fu r _ • „--1---4"?...7'.... i--*#,;;—*4r\N.,,\\,:\:44;” ---2, -,7..,,,T•ti''''''''::::::'-::,::is'‘'''':'7:,„.:'''''''I'''"'::','4";:::''' :',:'.:-'• * -''''',: -- -.:c.,14.' ''''' ' ''''64:".' V ''''' `,...-,,,:., \--- ,ik,'''"'''' '-'4''''''':.?..,,*•::i';','-:\- 7 • � • t , , -• " 1°.,N - I • •• ,*,.-'...,:i;\''' '':''' ''.41:',' t '''V'',spi'7.. . . _ - - . * -... t, , ,. . .,.,.i.- ' ,, --....,-N, . ; ��. s. y .. t _Cy va 4�• ..... .._ -:„...- • ,,,,,,--- ..‘,..e.,..,-, .,. . . ...i„,,,:;•,:,:.,). ..,,,,,,,. ., , . . _ ....v . . • . . -„.;•,•,,,,,,., ,,.. .... ..s.,t, .,.- ...,.t.-• :. -,-- • •. rA� '� U3 • �. ^� , . 1 • ! t� a jn yy L"'. i y w :y^a a,: � firsmw..v. Ec.,/, ,..1...„ , . i , !: 1-•:. ..,..... r,. !7.-4.-•;(1.4',(1 , ." / 1 -�. f.$j • (--,, AK ��i d • r._ „ • Lf f M NT' 1f,;;ffiti _..f.-. it if f-, . - . ,' .,:`.^-P'1 Y „s_ :sss:. ,„„..„.,......„.„,,,,,ii,,,,,,,,,,,!--- u...;: „..a- ..,.-...�.-..».. .,. _ L c/-'' 1 a 0 �. y � .' . • i 3.',P' „t kk J G ip DeLorme,Mapmyjfi of O®penStreetMap contributoGp batek N Legend Ax ETopography Map Approximate Project Boundary This map was created using Sambatek's Geographic n Information Systems(GIS),it is a compilation of s informatieotn and datead frosor mlegvsally ruescosordueerdtems.aTphis o 125 6900BrornoownMRNo ad manadpsinnondudrvoeybeuedaareferenc. Sambatek isnot responsible for any inaccuracies Scale In Feet contained herein. Sources:MetroGIS,NRCS,LMIC lc r 1, 7, re/ ,r a �. �•v tt ',S.,. .1.:*..., N ," ` ,.t aw: , . ... _ a3t" d !r{` ... .':c;.;:'!e4', •4 ,... . .. . .. • ,::.•- .plip A'' •TWVA 4,k ,' y '" rE �sy'3• aayrVr + x eV' h'..'''• vim :1a '3A' 1... ::`1".f.:',.."-.;\` Y , c :%;ej- : ,��.. t , �at _ .11.1'1 a '"3`asr . a „ . -'c+'"r' � lk ' �` tqP 15 .i • . $-7 .. '- 't ^ `$ 4. i. •• ' ,yY•srs .' `s 1222• ,. A` v • - : t"� 4 .a„ ,t, - ` ' 'a1 ". k 0 ,'. wo : • t.tf_ c.,!r, : _� • ::vkj::T2 ;: T ',+,'{ � (g•f40, . AI! - 11, C ,0/1) .4.":.le' 'Pt-,•'-- , Ah '-' o.'moo+ :' rr • ♦ k f x ,... ' 'r---'1'' ,,.z,,,.: a { ,` , , Y K ,+ atr ✓ lt•�. �:=.� E ' ,,, `�Q a 7,,,,,t- ' s aidi..17 i'lW j ttl r.t .i4'1 t 1 f k, .:,... ' , i•-;"1 ,--*,. ! .: ', . ' .., ;, . 1!. t . . ,— t'-'1 :f ' e oCha peL@Mgo i Mapm Autcf115,0 Ope StreetMap eentrib to Legend N t1 tl 7 1�1 Soil Sambatek W ,�\, E Hennepin County Survey Approximate Project Boundary This map was created using Sambatek's Geographic rRoad ®Hydric Information Systems(GIS),it is a compilation of information and data from va us sonans.This s 690 Brown oNon-hydric map is not a surveyed or legally recorded map o 125 250 Orono,MN and is intended to be used as a reference. Sambatek isnot responsy inaccuracies Scale In Feet 1111 III containea herein. Sources:MetroGIS,NRCS,LMIC . r �s4 • i � -,fm r'..,A wa i....-,, 110,4";',.....! 73 i , -°.1......=4„, '+--- t f.'.. _ t 111('. yr-4'. .r 1��-" ,ce a .� ay 'zs ''�''' rt, ��z tr fit` ,f 4t, PI Nll`A >p w,._ it, ...lie. . L w ,:7 1p : - ,,,,t. . • ,, 1 , „y's . ...-...,,,;17.,s . . gra .`.k , 'rt•-4„,,,,,,,41,,,r.,c • 1 ° ' y# .t,;, ,,y K ka rPl VIIC e..o'. •, ,y� a ; 4 x t-,'V r y '^'y , hkd ,„� `^' * "4....x.1„,- , "'Ss f �yqq, .,' ,, F fw 9 ,a Picss,t� y ''' I ra '''''''1'`',;,'"'.'''::;(1:* .�r'�.r^ 4.7z,-. 4, v ' ., 44,'.0 kA l`_"rR`/ ,.."i ` ti.{, ,y r" ;,,'J{„ x-. - 'r..+e N':'-' i -a' '' jL2U BH , , -� ,,cam i- -- - ~��- •z w Ma'+�,' ,-,1r - -•:�' ! Are nar -s.w,rPct irz ..+.• .l'+• j 3 a ..r 4,,. I , ''''''''-, ",,e' Vi..µ. t - j �. . , • • , ...e.c.4:•`,." .40, 1.- '''' ‘., ., i '-4 I.' t it....; ,...,,,,,,„ .,.,, - ,,; ..,....,, .; ;, , t i .. ..... „.„,,,,-, , ), ,/./7',>://'; , ,....„.„.,, ,,,;.;',,-.....,,,,,;,,,..„:111.„„ ,..... / /....,/, , ., , , //2// / s / LlUBH fM __ a O /P fast 1l f. 0 Y !,// PUBGa t: i� PUBG [3� Gter De LormeMaPrnylndia © PenStreetMap contributors ,! i.11 . - / j� / a , O Mambatek National Wetland Inventory Legend qr `/ F Approximate Project Boundary This map was created using Sambatek's Geographic x Information systems(cls),it is mpilation of s 690 Brown Road NW information and data from various sources.This map is not a surveyed or legally recorded map p 125 250 Orono MN and is intended to be used as a reference. Sambatek is not responsible for any inaccuracies Scale In Feet contained herein. Sources:MetroGlS,NRCS,LMIC :•,;.:....;.-.-.." ii s.. Ai {- r, . ‘. e '� e • �„e �d ,' ., �` -:a..i;,y. 9 ar .:t .. - c 1. -,,,.-7,-,. „,,,,,,,,„4.-,....,.#rr.r „-;;;..0„::::::;44,11,<0.A.4,---..i.„4.,:::::4'. '7Sr”' Y` '�.,, t t1� • t R �.. C w�" � ,Yom` ' -i�•� rc+�?' r4_uv—vna�, • • y 't '' � Yn ,.'�" "..'...'.",',k4'.'.'i ft rte. • yam, .y II. , y�r i. w 'i .- -aa. �' � 'b i . i. :! `' ' 11 ,� mom. t . tri r • ,., am' T _,,., --. ' . .r.:—'. , ,.. : '4,1:.,: 2 f ,,py ` III' • " : „ s, ;: I ! , , � F w� + ,.`if '. " 'P E .a a 3 17 • i .1. ��y,. J 1f :V L S :A o DeLo.�' p MapmylfiSo7}:jQt OpenStreetMap con tributo 3 ,S Legend i Sambatek 4x DNR Public Water Inventory W `/ F 3 Approximate Project Boundary This map was created using Sambatek's Geographic , mtnrmaa„n sy_.rems GIS),a�.a rompnaeon„r 690 Brown Road ®Public Water Basin infonnatinn and data From v us. it�s.This S map�enotesnreryeaerlegallyreed.fed�,rep o 250Orono,MN and is intended to be used as a reformer. Sambatek is not responsYinaccurac,E. Sale in Feet • conta;ned i5ere�n. Sources:MetroGlS,NRCS,LMIC • a � > 4 x Ix S Wetland 2 s K R " �� 'k „,,„.0„.,1, - - ` ,., u+!< a A*•g # 4 ,,,,ti in r rtd-: , '�4 :. .K..,. + ., Ste' x*” 41,4:' .01i a7.,„ � ;. . vr, . r 4 . .1 y .aFta�y •t �' `a t.'. v t �hJ • ci-'.4,,,',t „.: + f .•,�..-«.a..,u d x}mss° ~; ,. If . w T ;wiC . T „ a OAR 1 `4.40-.-_,It,,,, 111 Wetland 3 1'1 -214er • Njilit - Sample Transe r_. • " — (SP3-1) ': rCr*" A. .� Wetland 4 • r J i, r , Sample i� Tri•a r" t L�\' i, �, (SP1 P.1:: j, Wetland Sample Transect y� ..� { 4� ' a is SP4 1 ` Yi „'�# . t€ , Sample nsect r \ i' (SP1-1Tra) ' • t ' .� � l ,PeLormeoMapm,IEdtiu©OOpenStreetMapeentribute 3 i .r_ I Kgambattik NLegend Wimpn Wetland Delineation Map Approximate Project Boundary This map was created using Sambatek's Geographic xpp� Information Systems(GIS),it is a compilation of 1 fY -Wetland Bounda information and data from various sources.This s 690 Brown Road -Other Aquatic Resource map is not a surveyed or legally recorded map o 125 2:0 and is intended to be used as a reference. 1 1 t Orono,MN Sambatek is not responsible for any inaccuracies Scale hi Feet contained herein. Sources MetroGIS,NRCS,LMIC Wetland Delineation Photo Log 690 Brown Road Orono, Minnesota III July 6, 2016 IP''t . 1 ,, ' r. , , '' / III Photo 1. Wetland 1 facing southeast a y -, • d e iia' 3 , Photo 2.Northern boundary of Wetland 1 looking north `ak t.,. t , #°w t "L 4A.. 4 J , II \\} 11 Photo 3. Wetland 2 facin: north from south boundary •/ ,^tr. + •d iltc • t • Photo 4. Wetland 2 facing south east from north boundary ,10.14.....4‘,...z." ' „,..t.114,,vitti. i",4-4Y ,...,,k 144;44t',?:°„.;) ...e A qii-- ,,,. . -/-.--. , ,. - ...g-,,, acF "' t 5 A> 1 �.� e t'"4;iti' �t ti r.F -- v 4 4;'`.%'4 x fig # e ;, rr I s5t r /fy# r , t} � }.(14 F ` A ', f *pt s ' 7s"4 `, 'f2J k Photo 5. Wetland 3 facing west lJ. �/ Ir' k 1 if 7 f. / 1 Y '� ! ' ! / ',.1.' ham , t` r `�♦!, lZ %- — ' J�,.�.. R r 1T.4,. .;IVT'.TZ' Photo 6. Wetland 3 facing east . S, I, k itkv, tt}'-• 4,1,411':`. y gni 5 . fr1.="� '+i €44- �, \ `t� Photo 7. Wetland 4 looking west z .. t ir' zr (,,'`.:1';!., d r j2. �,i1:';*de t 1� u Yv t'tf n:$� < ; y � F t ,a "';'C fr'� '1; .;1/; ]�fix` 5,„q., 'f p 4. s� �� �7f� ,s.,4,.,--,6,,-„..,i.:•,.:)9 ,:k,..,,.,!,:,�. ,� i`1 r',1&'-r:' i y z ,r . S..,1,1„;". ./,}•,.� / sem- .'.t•, , °•,,., ' ,e; ,f,L"'f•-• ' rt . ,t,,, , , ,4:-.,:: ,iii- ifyPhoto 8. Wetland 4 facing south rt r , •� Vht ;FT ,•fhb ~- .,' ��6 .. &,. q �4- tet •, ,: IF „- + • r s I c: • " t. Photo 9. OAR 1 facing east .law: w %. : t --°';'7 :r . ' a :t try c-; ��< {.�� - .'ft ' 'I* Y-. S r ' Sj � r._ • II J;.� i.. ^ i rtY} : kksT Photo 10. OAR 1 facing west Willow Bay Sanctuary Conservation Design Application APPENDIX E Proposed Grading and Drainage Plan Li .. WILLOW BAY SANCTUARY IV i Ei' PRELIMINARY EROSION CONTROL AND SWPP PLAN 5 gl 2 0,2 2 ° .- `a,, ce gg.1 - :- -'---,-, - .., - - ,ST!,::',77:7 0 0 7 , --,---'---77-7-- --:------=-.4- - ; --- N 1 ,--__•,,,-_-,,-_---if,.....,-,7-.^.s^ rf----..,...s..,,,,,,r.,-,,,,rz Aff-.., S'Iri2 ` ----___— f ; f f-f' 7.°',770‘W•- ,,•'''.-' - ' 'if ,...........___ -- 0 .U9:-""-C.'r.f..'1.9.,v,'P.....-Ek.- r.$.L LI• ----/7),-7,-I,-op.,,,,,,,,-..,-,.....2.,-tr.-,,..t- ril.•:".4 r1:74-AF:',..1.^.7...2-.7...--....--s.Z..^r--- ,,,-,- :'\'`',--' '' '-'1', , , . ''•'. /,'//,',:'.r''41:‘L‘ ' '.,t,-l. `, c2,-;i9.8.. \--„__: ., ‘% 1511? '.-7A''''7'`,. ,,,, .,,,/;i_;,,',,....:;•1'',„f/'-"Zi-.1.,' -;,/"..-..-k-.,,'4,-„,,, -,', !___'_3 ._-___- --IT, \\ 17:458,7-,"4....,1i,4.-A'..+%7.1-F,.:1F7..27.m.4.1/4u7,r2.:.avirf.z.i-.".‘.,--,...'7...-1 -.—1;7-1-1•1-7.1.,.,_„,,,,,,r,,_,_,',,,,-"_,_-"..-.-.,-.,..,..,._„ ,i ,....-„;:-......:;.,)--„,-, „.., ,, -e„,. 2.4\-635::,'g,-.- -..- _-- ,..• :nft,:,,z7,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,--,,,,,,,--,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-- • 1-,,,,,..L-A ''''\'Iiii-:,---%:--,%.„-s,_4.-- '',IA, • .>`.- ' (74,--1 L"'' '''- - ' „...,..„......,,,E.,,,,,!,-,..fg,,,,-....zr.,,,,pr,„ .,r,...„,,,_;,..............................,...._ lit ,...,.. ............. ------•c-L-4,,,,i -t,.,-. 4,-,,,,,,:_,,,--,1 1,.., ..,.--_ ---7...L.,.?` v n, =, it ,---..,-2,4,,,,, --r-,,__ .,,,„--,-,,f:--,,,: — - ,_-------,-,r..r.,-..t.” ,, ' ,,,-....,!‘,---• ;:-..„--,,,.? ,---- -, - . ,..'...,i'i3,dC9>=',..':,,,_--,..., :-'',---1",,,J J -----.---..--. ; 1/' .'1-,4t!...4..,... .....=.......ten---„,..0-,,,, ' ,.,,•-,,L.,., -„, ,-,,_- .,..,-,-',.•..><.„4 , :':,,,,,:,7,,_,f'27.7.-''''...:7,..f.! -'a' ,!....r,.....r.,...,,,,,,,:zr....,,,....,..-,..,....-1,-.::..... III 1 l'i I '/:,-- 4..-'---- 1:1r2-L-rg_Fr.-....-'1'.:-:, -: ' . :-:, :,:'-,':,'',4,-,'''7%'' ---'..--':',--: •,..%..r I , - , -)1:--,-,' ---- 11- sr --'-- , fl .7' ii1 7. 1.., .0,...ke"'" '• .-,...--.-....- " ri.."=.+77:-.,-3..."..r.F-',',..",--,.."..., >1.-..---,,--.-w..m...-•^--.---- !11, g 11' -FA-l'P N •,'-','I:‘'Jr `•- ''',,,cyr ,./ Vz'q 7:'.'1"/1; *If allf.44'2!...Kft..774ts•MittN.7-7-7-.....-7. •—.---,-----..--- ----. Y'.- PI 't...,..,...,,,,,1,-....-.:r...,...r....r.....7...—-- r:-7,1,2:A.-,:,..''•',•-,,,,,=',,,•:.,,,,,,,,•..,-,,,, 0 100 200 400 odOPESS-ew sPovni Pam. ..47...7,'''....r7:4"`........'"'"''''''''''''.."-.-'. rr.to,-,1',"''T'vh,,..::',Ii'.14!F',°r.''V,"'Ku - ....-.... f-,-, 1 ..........„,.. -.... ->RUNOFF 0000000 DIRECTION SCALE IN FEET FOUR, ROM.AC on on-a....,...,....... ........“,....4...,.......,...t.....,..... 7V,i7,7...,17.7..,:k..T.i M.Lirtr.4.:VO:7,,,, .--- ::=::=7::::.........-..,....,........ .. ..,..3 Willow Bay Sanctuary Conservation Design Application APPENDIX F Landscape Plan o, TO ado ��`'��* * C3 C3 C3 0 0 11111 0 :.J4..14e * .. Revision#: Landscape Plan: 1 Date: 2/28/2019 Willow Bay Sanctuary Scale: Landscape Design by: Juli Neubarth 1:500 Backyard Reflections, Inc CHILTON STONE EDGING WITH CEDAR MULCH ' ' ,/140 . /---- • ‘ss s • :\ \ i \""'•'01/A ) ; if 10010 .r ) :02,."4.,,- ENTRYWAY ® �� CO .-i\i ) OUTLCROPPING51DER �1ALL PROPOSED SIGN LOCATION Qn1 ILEGEND ME FLOWER PERENNIAL 22 NEPATA,WALKERS LOW 29 GRASS,FEATHER REED SI-RUB DECIDUOUS-- .................... II HYDRANGEA LIMELIGHT__ lei DWARF KOREAN TREE,DECIDUOUS DROWN ROAD NORTH 6KeC+aTarPo TREE,_EVERGREEN bJvl SPRUCE,BLACK HILLS Revision#: Scale: Landscape Plan: 1 Landscape Design by: Juli Neuharth Date: 3/4/2019 1/8"=1' Willow Bay Sanctuary Entrance Backyard Reflections, Inc Print Form I WATER RESOURCE PERMIT APPLICATION FORM Use this form to notify/apply to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District(MCWD)of a proposed project or work which may fall within their jurisdiction.Fill out this form completely and submit with your site plan,maps,etc.to the MCWD at: 15320 Minnetonka Blvd.Minnetonka,MN 55345. Keep a copy for your records. YOU MUST OBTAIN ALL REQUIRED AUTHORIZATIONS BEFO' BEGINNING WORK. 1. Name of each property owner: ie.. G I>�_ /-¢21 Mailing Address: Do/ 4 ./(4 c' S-/ • City: ,Q�. ? - ,,, ate%j2 r-Zip: c;--S-? "/ Email Address P,12,; )�'�6�i '�'��,,�;i,�? - one: ,,1- C` ax5' <77- . 2. Property Owner Representative Information(not required)(licensed contractor, architect, engineer, etc...) Business Name: o t�8 Ck.c ASP OC/A7'ES',,l,vc. Representative Name: /144/K S. CA/04-4 CRf Business Address: yy_, ,V, e./;/4404<-;pt,vE City: Z', GAkr State: Zip: g53,56" Email Address: /iark9f5)9ronb ergo croc. ccm Phone: 992-r73- Fax:95-2-'12.?-4/V35 3. Project Address: 690 BRar.c%v ,Pf)Ap .0 City: ORO,vp State: 14,t- Zip: 5-5356 Qtr Section(s): Section(s): 591 Township(s):j/R Range(s): 2 Lot: iv/a Block: ,t,/,l Subdivision: x..//A PID:„ y_„8_23-/2-000 7 4. Size of project parcel(square feet or acres): 2y 37 r,c. Area of disturbance(square feet): 7r Ac, (3os c co :s;1 Volume of excavation/fill (cubic yards):20,000 r c r Area of existing impervious surface: 6,5 .sc•, Area of proposed impervious surface: 2.6/ tAc. Length of shoreline affected(feet): ,v/,q Waterbody(&bay if applicable): Zat/G z A/<F 5. Type of permit being applied for(Check all that apply): )21 EROSION CONTROL 13(WATERBODY CROSSINGS/STRUCTURES ❑ FLOODPLAIN ALTERATION 3Eit STORMWATER MANAGEMENT JRI WETLAND PROTECTION 0 APPROPRIATIONS ❑ DREDGING 0 ILLICIT DISCHARGE ❑ SHORELINE/STREAMBANK STABILIZATION 6. Project purpose(Check all that apply): ❑ SINGLE FAMILY HOME 0 MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL(apartments) ROAD CONSTRUCTION 0 COMMERCIAL or INSTITUTIONAL UTILITIES 5Rt SUBDIVISIONS(include number of lots) -7 ❑ DREDGING 0 LANDSCAPING(pools,berms,etc.) ❑ SHORELINE/STREAMBANK STABILIZATION 0 OTHER(DESCRIBE): 7.NPDES/SDS General Stormwater Permit Number(if applicable): 8. Waterbody receiving runoff from site: z a,t/G Z,9) 6-• 9. Project Timeline: Start Date: SPRi/. 20/9 Completion Date: A:44, cf 9 Permits have been applied for: City ®County 0 MN Pollution Control Agency [3 DNR 0 COE 0 Permits have been received: City MN Pollution Control Agency DNR—1 COE—D By signing below,I hereby request a permit to authorize the activities described herein.I certify that I am familiar with MCWD Rules and that the proposed activity will be conducted in compliance with these Rules.I am familiar with the information contained in this application and,to the best of my knowledge and belief,all information is true,complete and accurate. I understand that pr. eeding with work before all required authorizations are obtained may be subject to federal,state and/or local administrative and or-cfi ninal penalties. "Sil rat1l a ouch Property Owner Date BO LTO N 2638 Shadow Lane Suite 200 f , A & M E N K Chaska, MN 55318-1172 Real People. Real Solutions. Ph: (952)448-8838 Fax: (952)448-8805 Bolton-Menk.com April 8, 2019 City of Orono Attn:Jeremy Barnhart 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono, MN 55356 RE: Preliminary Plat Application LA19-000022 Willow Bay Sanctuary Engineering Review#1 Dear Jeremy: As requested, I have completed an engineering review of the documents submitted for the above referenced project. We offer the following observations, comments, and recommendations for your consideration: 1. It is unclear what is proposed for stormwater runoff management to meet regulatory requirements. The Preliminary Grading Plan depicts a dry retention pond on the north side of the proposed street. The Preliminary Erosion Control and SWPP Plan depicts a wet retention pond on the north side of the proposed street and rain gardens on Lots 2, 4, 5, and 6. The hydraulic calculations indicate a wet retention pond with a filter bench and the rain gardens will be used to meet requirements. The following should be considered regarding stormwater management: a. The Stormwater Management Report and Preliminary Plans should be coordinated to indicate the same stormwater management system. The system must limit proposed peak runoff rates to that of existing for the 1, 10, and 100 year—24h hour events. The system must limit proposed discharges of runoff volume, Total Suspended Solids, and Phosphorus to that of existing conditions as well. Since more than one acre of new impervious surface is proposed, the system must include volume reduction equal to 1" of runoff from the new impervious surface per NPDES requirements. The stormwater management plan should be revised as necessary to meet all requirements and resubmitted for review prior to Preliminary Plat approval to ensure adequate siting is available for required facilities. b. Storm sewer and inlets are located on Brown Road near the proposed intersection, but these facilities are not indicated on the plans. The Storm Water Management Plan should be revised to include these accordingly. c. All proposed culverts should be included in the hydraulic calculations to verify adequate sizing, except the driveway culverts for Lots 1,4, 5, and 7. 2. Facilities necessary to meet regulatory requirements should be installed and the site mass- graded at the same time as street construction to ensure all drainage ways and watersheds are constructed per the approved Stormwater Management Plan. If done piece-meal, coordination of required stormwater management facilities can be difficult, and facilities required may be forgotten during future construction. 3. Long Lake is impaired for nutrients, and the City of Orono has been assigned a load reduction of 125 lbs/yr. The City should consider reviewing potential of maximizing stormwater runoff H:\ORNO\C13117856\z_LA19-000022 Willow Bay Sanctuary\WillowBaySanctuary_PrePlatReview_2019-04-08.docx Bolton&Menk is an equal opportunity employer. Preliminary Plat Application LA19-000022 Willow Bay Sanctuary Page 2 treatment with this development in order to help meet their load reduction requirements. 4. Final Plans should include the following: a. Grading, Drainage, and Erosion Control Plan b. Street Construction Plan c. Landscape and Restoration Plan d. SWPPP meeting NPDES requirements 5. The applicant will be required to obtain Minnehaha Creek Watershed District(MCWD) approval and permitting. A copy of any approvals or permits required should be submitted prior to Final Plat approval. 6. The applicant will be required to obtain a General Construction Permit(NPDES)to discharge stormwater associated with construction activity since more than 1 acre will be disturbed. A copy of the permit should be submitted prior to any land disturbing activity. 7. The applicant will be required to submit a Maintenance Agreement for all stormwater management structures and facilities. The agreement should define maintenance responsibilities following completion of project, specify types and frequencies of inspection and maintenance activities, designate who will conduct inspection and maintenance activities, and outline reporting requirements. The agreement should list MCWD and the City of Orono as parties to the agreement. 8. Drainage and Utility Easements should be provided as follows: a. Over all stormwater management facilities used to meet regulatory requirements. b. Over all wetland and buffers. c. All swales and piping providing drainage for multiple properties. d. 5' along all side lot lines, unless adjacent to Development boundary. e. 10' along all front lot lines, rear lot lines, and adjacent to Development boundary. 9. A typical section should be provided for both the urban and rural portions of the proposed street. The rural section should provide a minimum 2' depth for the ditch per the City Standard Detail. The cul-de-sac must provide a minimum 40' radius of paved area. 10. More detail should be provided regarding the connections to Brown Road. If the curb and gutter from Brown Road are to direct runoff into the site, a spillway should be provided, and the Stormwater Management Plan should include this area. Road repair should be detailed and sequenced for connections to the sanitary sewer and watermain. 11. The sanitary sewer system proposed should be revised to remove the lift stations. A low- pressure system should be utilized, with each home having its own pump. 12. Service stubs should be indicated on the plan and installed with street and utility construction. 13. A fire hydrant should be added at the intersection with Brown Road. If you have any questions or comments,please contact me to discuss. Sincerely, Bolton &Menk, Inc. Robert E. Bean, Jr.,P.E. Water Resources Engineer CC: Adam Edwards, City of Orono H:\ORNO\C13117856\z_LA19-000022 Willow Bay Sanctuary\WillowBaySanctuary_PrePlatReview_2019-04-08.docx Bolton&Menk is an equal opportunity employer. From: James Van Evil To: Jeremy Barnhart Subject: Re:690 Brown Road Date: Friday,April 5,2019 8:17:41 AM Attachments: 1461960826 Instagram.onq 1461958277 square-linkedin.onq PastedGraohic-3.tiff Hi Jeremy, I reviewed the pdfs and it looks great. I have one question. Can we add a hydrant to the entrance of the development or across the street at the entrance to Sugerwood Dr? Thanks, James Van Eyll Fire Chief Long Lake Fire Department jvaneyll(ci.longlakemn gov f alY in On Apr 4, 2019, at 3:48 PM, Jeremy Barnhart<jbarnhart@ci.orono.mn.us> wrote: Chief, Do you have any comments with the proposed subdivision at 690 Brown Road? I have attached the utility plan showing two hydrants, and the plat. All lots will be on city water and sewer. Jeremy Barnhart, AICP Community Development Director City of Orono 952-249-4626 <Prelim PIat.PDF><Utility Plan.PDF> Hennepin Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Date: 3/18/2019 e 5,fF ritt "rim ,74iNaria.0 litil ti.,,,,,-:',;!':',5'-'''',.;;:, -;?:':-17,1:17!.;1-1-4,.,, . , . , III I Ali, ix: ,42,!,:;‘,- ,'''., -;-',4,iiii,.; 't',,,:i',.:-.-''• ,.'''.,, j,. IS v, Fj4 r t Lligl , i s ',7'':':',::.i,it'i::!'',?IT'!-r':'.'-':'-':''':'-t,'':'iI .:,,!.*kf,titil!t,.',,r'O.:,: ',,:L':;,'".,„'\',,'',''.'I',:,,,,,LVri;',t1,:c,!,:1;,j1;';...,,, .,,, ...:--.::%':,......--7.-'. , 1:!:..:-!..,41g:,:.,!::1;!7:, ,:iii,,..,::::::(,:ii:t:ci.-;!!!!!-:-",::::?'t.,'. ,,, 7 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMII ten€,.;,.„,,,. '' a; ,''$- � r - �-.' - a ... € . �€€ss ”`-v i s tes € f rx *t a ast' ,,. 4€s4";- " wN J ea{ fi r.'k #t.x r¢ II 1 f y Agillitifir cLa�1:1.y iAl 5.4:�k. [; "i► IY�..':.. ..f ?"s°5, qtr, s 1Jc4j 1+ s Buffer Size: 500 0 100 200 400 Feet Map Comments: l i i i l i i i l 690 Brown Road This data (i) is furnished AS IS with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (i)is furnishedwithnowarranty of any kind, and (ii) is notsuitable for legal,engineering or surveying purposes.HennepinCountyshat not beliableforwrydamage,injury o loss resulting from this data. For more information,contact Hennepin CountyGiS Offce 300 6th Street So uth,M nn ea pol is,M N 55487/g is.nfo@hennepi n us RUN DATE:03/18/2019 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:1 38 27-118-23 34 0006 38 34-118-23 11 0003 38 34-118-23 210010 LESLIE N BARRY THOMAS J&JENNIFER L HOGAN J P BRINK&V M BRINK 809 BROWN RD N 790 BROWN RD N 2003 SUGARWOOD DR ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 LESLIE N HAHN THOMAS J HOGAN JEFFREY P BRINK 809 BROWN RD N JENNIFER L HOGAN 2003 SUGARWOOD DR LONG LAKE MN 55356 790 BROWN ROAD NORTH LONG LAKE MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 38 27-118-23 43 0013 38 34-118-23 11 0006 38 34-118-2321 0011 R L PARRISH&C J PARRISH MARY L STEIL ET AL WILLIAM G BIGLEY 1995 WEST FARM RD 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 2005 SUGARWOOD DR ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55356 RICHARD L PARRISH MARY L STEIL ET AL WILLIAM G BIGLEY 1995 WEST FARM RD 744 BROWN RD N 21 E HURON ST.1205 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 CHICAGO IL 60611 38 27-118-23 43 0014 38 34-118-23 110007 38 34-118-23 21 0015 K SCHIMPKE&K SCHIMPKE MICHAEL NORTH&SARA E NORTH DAVID M AHLERS 1925 WEST FARM RD 800 BROWN RD N 2109 SUGARWOOD DR ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 KURT SCHIMPKE MICHAEL NORTH&SARA E NORTH DAVID M AHLERS KRISTEN SCHIMPKE 800 BROWN RD N 2109 SUGARWOOD DR 1925 WEST FARM RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 27-118-23 43 0015 38 34-118-23 12 0002 38 34-118-23 21 0016 S ANDERSON&N ANDERSON SCOTT A MABUSTH ET AL P MAHONEY&A MAHONEY 1889 WEST FARM RD 740 BROWN RD N 2107 SUGARWOOD DR ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 STILES ANDERSON SCOTT A MABUSTH PATRICK MAHONEY NICOLE ANDERSON 740 BROWN ROAD NORTH ANGELA MAHONEY 1889 WEST FARM RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 2107 SUGARWOOD DR LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 27-118-23 43 0018 38 34-118-23 12 0004 38 34-118-23 21 0025 E Y BELTRAND&M R BELTRAND T S GARRETT&W P GARRETT G E MILEUSNIC&M MILEUSNIC 1860 WEST FARM RD 650 BROWN RD N 2110 SUGARWOOD DR ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 MARK&ELIZABETH BELTRAND TANA S&WARREN P GARRETT GEORGE E&MARILYN MILEUSNIC 1860 WEST FARM RD 650 BROWN RD N 2110 SUGARWOOD DR LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 27-118-23 43 0024 38 34-118-23 12 0005 38 34-118-23 21 0026 THE FARM AT LONG LAKE T M SCHULTZE&M L STEIL KARL G BERG TRUST 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 744 BROWN RD N 2112 SUGARWOOD DR ORONO MN 00000 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 THE FARM AT LONG LAKE M L STEIL&T M SCHULTZE KARL AND KONNIE BERG ELIZABETH BELTRAND 744 BROWN RD N 2112 SUGARWOOD DR 1860 WEST FARM ROAD LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 27-118-23 43 0026 38 34-118-23 12 0006 38 34-118-23 21 0027 D A SHULER&S M SHULER ROBERT HUTTER/ALICIA NUTTER J F WOODHEAD IV/K B WOODHEAD 1849 WEST FARM RD 770 BROWN RD N 2114 SUGARWOOD DR ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 DAVID ALAN SHULER ROBERT P HUTTER JOHN F WOODHEAD IV SUSAN MARIE SHULER 770 NORTH BROWN RD KELLEY B WOODHEAD 1849 WEST FARM RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 2114 SUGARWOOD DR LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 27-118-23 44 0019 38 34-118-23 12 0007 38 34-118-23 210028 S C MULDOON&P D MULDOON E J LARSON/S A LARSON LIV TR SUGAR WOODS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC 1801 WEST FARM RD 690 BROWN RD N 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 00000 SAMANTHA CAPEN MULDOON ERIC&ANDREA LARSON SUGAR WOODS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC PAUL D MULDOON 690 BROWN RD N C/O FRANK PINGTENS 1801 WEST FARM RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 2007 SUGARWOODS DR ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 38 34-118-23 11 0001 38 34-118-23 210003 38 34-118-23 210029 R D BENSON/B A LUIKENS TRSTE P J BALTHAZOR/M L BALTHAZOR SUGAR WOODS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC 776 BROWN RD N 2002 SUGARWOOD DR 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 00000 BARBARA A LUIKENS PAUL J BALTHAZOR SUGAR WOODS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC RICHARD B BENSON MICHELE L BALTHAZOR C/O REBERS FAMILY LLC 776 BROWN RD N 2002 SUGARWOOD DR 2640 OAKLAND RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 MINNETONKA MN 55305 38 34-118-23 11 0002 38 34-118-23 21 0009 38 34-118-23 210030 J D STAVID&P M STAVID M K ROTONDO&B G BROVOLD SUGAR WOODS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC 780 BROWN RD N 2001 SUGARWOOD DR 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 00000 JOHN&PHOEBE STAVIG MARIA K ROTONDO SUGAR WOODS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC 780 BROWN RD N BRANDON G BROVOLD C/O REBERS FAMILY LLC LONG LAKE MN 55356 2001 SUGARWOOD DR 2640 OAKLAND RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 MINNETONKA MN 55305 RUN DATE:03/18/2019 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:2 38 34-118-23 210036 72 34-118-23 13 0084 72 34-118-23 24 0078 ORONO HSG&RDVLPT ATHY TERESA FORREST CITY OF LONG LAKE 2040 WAYZATA BLVD W 576 BROWN RD N A 72 ADDRESS PENDING ORONO MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 00000 ORONO HSG&RDVLPT ATHY TERESA LAMB CITY OF LONG LAKE 2040 WAYZATA BLVD W 576 BROWN RD N#A 450 VIRGINIA AVE LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 PO BOX 606 LONG LAKE MN 55356 72 34-118-23 13 0002 72 34-118-23 13 0086 JEROME A BORGERT H E SEIBOLD ET AL TRUSTEES 570 BROWN RD N 576 BROWN RD N B LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 JEROME A BORGERT MARVIN E SEIBOLD 2040 W WAYZATA BLVD#220 PO BOX 58 ORONO MN 55356 PEQUOT LAKES MN 56472 72 34-118-23 13 0066 72 34-118-23 13 0087 CITY OF LONG LAKE H E SEIBOLD ET AL TRUSTEES 72 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED 576 BROWN RD N B LONG LAKE MN 00000 LONG LAKE MN 55356 CITY OF LONG LAKE MARVIN E SEIBOLD 450 VIRGINIA AVE PO BOX 58 PO BOX 606 PEQUOT LAKES MN 56472 LONG LAKE MN 55356 72 34-118-23 13 0071 72 34-118-23 13 0090 STATE BANK OF LONG LAKE JANE M THOMPSON 1964 WAYZATA BLVD W 576 BROWN RD N D LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 STATE BANK OF LONG LAKE JANE M THOMPSON 1964 WAYZATA BLVD W 576 BROWN RD N #D LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 72 34-118-23 13 0074 72 34-118-23 13 0092 P&C RENTALS LLC VIRGINIA S DOWDS 1948 WAYZATA BLVD W 578 BROWN RD N A LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 P&C RENTALS LLC VIRGINIA S DOWDS P O BOX 14366 578 BROWN RD N#A SCOTTSDALE AZ 85267 LONG LAKE MN 55356 72 34-118-23 13 0076 72 34-118-23 13 0094 AMY C ANDERSON JEAN E KESSLER 574 BROWNRDNA 578 BROWNRDNB LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 AMY C ANDERSON JEAN E KESSLER 574 BROWN RD N #A 578 BROWN RD N #B LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 72 34-118-23 13 0078 72 34-118-23 13 0096 INEZ L GANTZ R T&E F LUKANEN TRUST 574 BROWN RD N B 578 BROWN RD N C LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 INEZ L GANTZ RANDOLPH T LUKANEN 574 BROWN RD N#B ELAINE F LUKANEN LONG LAKE MN 55356 578 BROWN RD N #C LONG LAKE MN 55356 72 34-118-23 13 0080 72 34-118-23 13 0098 JENNIFER J NYBERG D J MCCARTHY&D J MCCARTHY 574 BROWN RD N C 578 BROWN RD N D LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 JENNIFER NYBERG DANIEL J MCCARTHY 574 BROWN RD N #C DONNA J MCCARTHY LONG LAKE MN 55356 578 BROWN RD N #D LONG LAKE MN 55356 72 34-118-23 13 0081 72 34-118-23 13 0100 JENNIFER J NYBERG WEST SHORE TOWNHOMES ASSN 574 BROWN RD N C 72 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 00000 JENNIFER NYBERG C E VAN EECKHOUT 574 BROWN RD N #C 120 SOUTH BROWN RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 72 34-118-23 13 0082 72 34-118-23 13 0102 JANET A KNOX J A ANDERSON&K S ANDERSON 574 BROWNRDND 576 BROWNRDNC LONG LAKE MN 55356 LONG LAKE MN 55356 JANET A KNOX JUDD A ANDERSON 574 BROWN RD N #D KAREN STUART ANDERSON LONG LAKE MN 55356 576 BROWN RD N #C LONG LAKE MN 55356 Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases.Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available.The viewer should understand,however,that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties,either express or implied,or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. April 9, 2019 Orono Planning Commission 2750 Kelley Parkway Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Good evening all: Subject: 690 Brown Road North proposed subdivision I have reviewed the proposed plat and commend the Larson's for keeping with the 2 acre minimum lot size we enjoy in our 26 years of living in Orono.We are the owners of the lot immediately north and north east of the proposed subdivision. I/we have a concern over the proposed plat in that the location of the homes on lots 3 and 4 will require a significant reduction in the size of the wetlands.This will naturally reduce the ability of the wetlands to filter the water which will enter Long Lake.Given the amount of time and dollars already spent to clean up Long Lake,this seems to be a counter productive measure. May I/we suggest a modification of the plat to move the home locations for lots 3 and 4 to the west side of the wetlands thus keeping the filtering process from the wetland intact as much as possible. Thank you: Mary and Ted Schultze 744 Brown Road North Long Lake, MN 55356 (m)763.218.6632 tedmschultze@gmail.com Date Application Received: 02/20/19 0�T Date Application Considered as Complete:03/20/19i VO 60-Day Review Period Expires: 05/19/19 To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members �`�� �� Dustin Rief, City Administrator �kEsxo¢� From: Melanie Curtis, Planner h'1GG Date: 15 April 2019 Subject: #LA19-000023, Nor-Son Custom Builders o/b/o Charles &Jill Miller, 1600 Bohns Point Road, IUP—Export 500+cubic yards of material Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting an interim use permit to export approximately 1,300 cubic yards of material in conjunction with construction of a new residence. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval with conditions. Background A new home is proposed at 1600 Bohns Point Road.The project will involve the export of approximately 1,300 cubic yards of material from the site; an interim use permit(IUP) is required. Section 78-330-Lot Area/Width: LR-1B Lot Area Lot Width Required 43,560 s.f. (1.0 acres) 140' Actual 54,802 s.f. (1.25 acre) 200' @ 75'/ 177' @ OHWL Applicable Regulations: Interim Use Permit (Code Section 78-1726(a)(6)) The construction of the new home will result in 1,300 cubic yards of unneeded material.The applicant proposes to export this from the site; the destination will not be within the City.The proposed home will not be out of character with the neighborhood. Applicable Regulation: Interim Use Permit(Section 78-1726) The Planning Commission may recommend and the Council may grant an Interim Use Permit (IUP). On the basis of the application and the evidence submitted,the city council determines that the use will comply with the following: 1) The use will meet the general performance standards in section 78-916 of this chapter; the proposed grading will conform to the standards within Section 78-916 of the Zoning Code. FILE#LA19-000023 15 April 2019 Page 2 of 3 2) The use is allowed as an interim use in the applicable zoning district;grading and export of materials are permitted within the LR-1B zoning district;this statement is true. 3) The use will not delay anticipated development or redevelopment of the site;the proposed grading activity will be conducted in conjunction with the development of the new single family home on the property.This statement is true. 4) The use will not be in conflict with any provisions of the city code on an ongoing basis; the proposed grading activity will not be in conflict with the Code. 5) The use will not adversely affect the adjacent property,the surrounding neighborhood, or other uses on the property where the use will be located;this standard requires that the proposed grading and improvements must not substantially impair the use and enjoyment of the properties in the area when compared to the impairment or impact of generally permitted uses. The result of the proposed grading will not change the intended residential use of the Property so there should be no change in the use and enjoyment of adjacent properties resulting from the export of fill materials. However, activity of exporting approximately 1,300 cubic yards of fill and active grading of the Property during construction can have a temporary adverse impact on neighbors. The grading work on the Property as well as the forthcoming construction of the proposed home could result in additional noise, dust,vibration and traffic on the haul routes and immediate neighbors. To the degree possible, negative impacts should be limited and mitigated. 6) The use will not impose additional unreasonable costs on the public;the builder and owner will be responsible for keeping debris off of the roadways.The noise resulting from the trucks hauling and equipment moving the material in and around the site should be minimized to the extent possible. The grading and construction project will be monitored by the City Engineer and planning staff so as to minimize nuisances during the project. 7) The date or event that will terminate the use can be identified with certainty;the conclusion of the grading activity will coincide with the finalization of the construction of the proposed home on the property.An as-built survey shall be submitted to confirm conformance with the approved grading plan at the closing of the permits. 8) And the applicant agrees in writing to any conditions that the city council deems appropriate for the use, including a requirement for a financial security to ensure removal of all evidence of the use upon termination, and restoration of the site to prior or better conditions.The conditions shall be set forth in a development agreement between the property owner and the city,which agreement shall be recorded with the Hennepin County Recorder or Registrar of Deeds.The conditions of approval will be documented as required. Interim Use Permit Analysis Staff finds the proposed plan conforms to the standards of IUP review,the grading activity will be tied to the building permit for the new residence. Engineer Comments City Engineer comments are attached as Exhibit C. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. FILE#LA19-000023 15 April 2019 Page 3 of 3 Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the IUP, if granted,will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested IUP? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends approval with the IUP in accordance with the City Engineer's requirements associated with the overall building permit. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Narrative& Haul Route Exhibit B. Existing& Proposed Survey/Site Plan Exhibit C. City Engineer Memo Exhibit D. Property Owners List Exhibit E. Plat Map Land Use Application Summary Application Date: 03/20/2019 Address: 1600 BOHNS POINT RD WAYZATA, MN 55391 Parcel Number: 1611723220001 Land Use Number: LA 19-000023 Application Submitted By: Agent on behalf of property owner Owner: Name: CHARLES MILLER&JILL MILLER Address: 2696 CAROLINA AVE ORONO, MN 55391 Applicant: Name: Brody Schmid Company:Nor-Son Custom Builders Address: 700 E Lake St. Wayzata, MN 55391 brody.schmid@nor-son.com Contact Information: Associated Contact: Brody Schmid brody.schmid@nor-son.com Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Project Description: IUP for export+/-1300 cy Land Use Application Type: Amendmend Application Appeal of Admin Decision Concept Application Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Application Subdivision Application Subdivision Exception Vacation Application Variance Application Applicant Signature: -41/4.- NOR-SON CUSTOM BUILDERS Miller Residence 1600 Bohns Point Road Wayzata, Mn, 55391 Project Narrative: New construction, 2-story house with finished basement. Starting construction right after road restrictions, early May, 2019. Exporting 1,300 cubic yards of fill off site, final destination of fill is outside of the City of Orono. See below hauling route & final destination. r Stewart ComJSpanies,Inc b 153 , t H�. 1,,,'4,0 Elm! sAw Park It $1 , y it ' Greerdreld t$ Corcoran 1 r,'x,. :w Rocki 's ss Maple Grove I FA35min ;. ;�38min 22.3 milesLo 0 26.0 mIbe il Y she 1Afiii 31mm '.f` it,,,,, , l99.6 miles },.Medina I Indep deuce Plymouth PI ,* . t Long Laky. "^' ; '' '" ''.,'W e '` '�a?,,,t-,.`.. "- Orono .. a :., a t,rte x - i 3 4. � r <c>-, e c am �y; '' # 1600 Be nape MA;04,„,1*,,,, ':; i : .:.; •�,,�.� al,4 17011;t71. -.: r��^ a woodland jill �,. ,..,eta - ' 1 . Mound .5prlaq Par!(;nnnloKt ...'{abC Brody Schmid Project Manager Nor-Son,Inc.An Integrated Consulting,Design&Construction Services Firm• 800.858.1722 toll free • www.nor-son.com Minnesota Headquarters • 7900 Hastings Road • Baxter,MN 56425 • 218.828.1722 main • 218.828.0487 fax Twin Cities Office • 700 East Lake Street,Suite 213•Wayzata,MN 55391 •612.2161800 main•218.828.0487 fax MN Lk(Cco1%9 North Dakota Office • 474 45th Street South,Suite B• Fargo,ND 58103• 701.364.4071 main• 701.364.9095 fax sous 125361 I CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY FOR BOHNS POINT MODERN I OF LOT 1, AUDITOR'S SUBDIVISION NO. 349 I HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA EXISTING HOUSE I /1560 I I I . I ' 'ii u r \ I • ; C,n' , I _ sun — v / [.0-F.I 1 'EAST ` 7— _ 266.80---.., yip _ _ 6231 9950 __ 4. eG .40.:-,-," __ _, ,4 .`..„ LAKE � ° ...�" o � 3° �: MINNETONKA „r w �d, r' 17 0 011/ / I O '4\�i-/ /.'`\ -- ____. e�' _- °o^ I\,,s10-1e%d 111 11 1 4i.l,4:1 1.. / - 1 ,Ir l CRYSTAL BAY -'PROPOSED . i,1 y e 'I ,.-si w 1 tONe z `\ i1 HOUSE ioi; i m1 aalrr D) Ohm.ez /1500 ® �-uE`ca«i tili LIT" dl.. T a 1�f �" , §, ,r, I ae IIA I to..1` gypy i'" \ c dNo p A( �; , ;e I.. 215.S ` c t\�� .aaeSCdi+. Ao�� ,�' /gym W__ -v.,,,,, 1.‘, rTf ° a I rnu, r "! I 0 EXISTING I HOUSE /1540 I 0 1 :_lS I LP LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PREIASES: Lot 1,Auditor's Subdivision No.349 o t denotes iron marker •: denotes iron marker found PROPOSED ELEVATIONS: (per architect,verify) (908.3): denotes existing spot elevation,mean sea level dotum 1)Garage=1949.461 Igio.e1: denotes proposed spat elevation • 2)Top of foundation=1949.981 --912---: denotes existing contour line,mean sea level datum 3)Main floor=1951.41 denotes proposed contour line 3)Basement=194035J Bearings shown are based upon on assumed datum. • 4)Sunken theater=MEI This survey mends to Douse, tto boundaries . the above s.spoted elevations nde location by a existing n e to bene ved,existing trues. ely.pool. and topography,and the proposed location of a proposed house,vevents,pool,pato and grades thereon.It does not purport to snow any other improvements or encroachments. MU a aw, 1f s ar '4'"e.ti er report PROJECT GRONBERG & ASSOCIATES, INC. M1ereey eer111y that th Fr.Ill. ey .o .�.r my•reef a per.l,... No-. so ro®o�.o am aM Inas I am a tluly licemed Lme Sw.eyo.viMr the 12-18-15 CIVIL%NGINN%RS,LAND SURVEYORS.LAND PLANNERS -e.n .........,.o............�.... meeato. 1'.20' MN 55356 -� 445 NORTH WILLOW DRIVE LONG LAKE, Merl S.Croneere Minnesota License Number 12755 1D-025 952-473-4141 From: Adam Edwards To: Melanie Curtis Subject: RE:IUP Grading Review-LA19-000023/1600 Bohns Point Date: Friday,March 22,2019 3:26:56 PM Melanie, My comments: 1. The haul route okay after spring weight restrictions are lifted. 2. Although the proposed retaining wall is depicted at less than 4 feet it is being built on 10 feet of fill. It should be designed by a licensed professional engineer. Adam From: Melanie Curtis Sent:Thursday, March 21, 2019 3:53 PM To:Adam Edwards<aedwards@ci.orono.mn.us> Subject: IUP Grading Review- LA19-000023/ 1600 Bohns Point Adam Please review the attached plan for a request for an IUP to export approximately 1300 cubic yards of material in conjunction with a new home (Permit RPS19-000031). I'm looking for comments from you by or before March 27th if possible; this will go to PC on April 15th The building permit is currently under review. Thank you. Melanie Curtis, Planner Direct 952.249.4627 Planning &Zoning Office 952.249.4620 2750 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 Email: mcurtis@ci.orono.mn.us Website: www.ci.orono.mn.us All permitting is now done through our new online portal - LINK. RUN DATE:03/20/2019 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:1 38 08-117-23 44 0024 38 16-117-23 22 0007 38 17-117-23 11 0010 KATHLEEN A HALLORAN ETAL TRS 1725 BOHNS POINT LLC RONALD L&SUSAN K OTTEN 1595 BOHNS POINT RD 1725 BOHNS POINT RD 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 00000 PATRICK J HALLORAN 1725 BOHNS POINT LLC RONALD L OTTEN KATHLEEN A HALLORAN 1725 BOHNS POINT RD SUSAN K OTTEN 1595 BOHNS POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 1655 BOHNS POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 08-117-23 44 0025 38 16-117-23 22 0008 38 17-117-23 11 0011 TODD A MOITZ REVOCABLE TRUST 1720 BOHNS POINT LLC RONALD L&SUSAN K OTTEN 1535 BOHNS POINT RD 1720 BOHNS POINT RD 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 00000 TODD A MOITZ REVOCABLE TRUST 1720 BOHNS POINT LLC RONALD L OTTEN 1535 BOHNS POINT ROAD 1725 BOHNS POINT RD SUSAN K OTTEN WAYZATA MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 1655 BOHNS POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 08-117-23 44 0026 38 17-117-23 11 0002 38 17-117-23 11 0012 MAP HOLDINGS LLC RONALD L&SUSAN K OTTEN RONALD L&SUSAN K OTTEN 1565 BOHNS POINT RD 1655 BOHNS POINT RD 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 00000 MAP HOLDINGS LLC RONALD L OTTEN RONALD L OTTEN 1595 BOHNS POINT RD SUSAN K OTTEN SUSAN K OTTEN WAYZATA MN 55391 1655 BOHNS POINT RD 1655 BOHNS POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 09-117-23 33 0005 38 17-117-23 11 0003 38 17-117-23 11 0013 DAVID M LEAVENWORTH ECKER FAMILY LIVING TRUST RONALD L&SUSAN K OTTEN 1500 BOHNS POINT RD 1625 BOHNS POINT RD 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 00000 DAVID M LEAVENWORTH ECKER FAMILY LIVING TRUST RONALD L OTTEN 1500 BOHNS POINT RD 1625 BOHNS POINT RD SUSAN K OTTEN WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 1655 BOHNS POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 09-117-23 33 0006 38 17-117-23 11 0004 MARC NEMER REV TRUST J CHURCH/K CHURCH TRSTS ETAL 1520 BOHNS POINT RD 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 00000 MARC NEMER REV TRUST JOHN CHURCH 6420 CHERRY CT KLERISSA CHURCH NIWOT CO 80503 1645 BOHNS POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 09-117-23 33 0007 38 17-117-23 11 0005 MARY JANE HAUSER WILLIAM F AND JULIE R SNYDER 1540 BOHNS POINT RD 1629 BOHNS POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 MARY JANE HAUSER WILLIAM F&JULIE R SNYDER 1540 BOHNS POINT RD 1629 BOHNS POINT TD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 09-117-23 33 0008 38 17-117-23 11 0006 THE NYK TRUST JAMES MURPHY/CYNTHIA MURPHY 1580 BOHNS POINT RD 1635 BOHNS POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 THE NYK TRUST JAMES H MURPHY 1580 BOHNS POINT RD CYNTHIA A MURPHY ORONO MN 55391 5128 QUEEN AVE S MINNEAPOLIS MN 55410 38 16-117-23 22 0001 38 17-117-23 11 0007 CHARLES MILLER&JILL MILLER J CHURCH&K CHURCH TRUSTS 1600 BOHNS POINT RD 1645 BOHNS POINT RD ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 55391 CHARLES MILLER&JILL MILLER JOHN CHURCH 2696 CAROLINA AVE KLERISSA CHURCH ORONO MN 55391 1645 BOHNS POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 16-117-23 22 0002 38 17-117-23 11 0008 ANGELA P ROSS RONALD L&SUSAN K OTTEN 1640 BOHNS POINT RD 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 00000 ANGELA P ROSS RONALD L OTTEN 1640 BOHNS POINT RD SUSAN K OTTEN WAYZATA MN 55391 1655 BOHNS POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 38 16-117-23 22 0003 38 17-117-23 11 0009 P A SANTRACH/M A K SANTRACH RONALD L&SUSAN K OTTEN 1700 BOHNS POINT RD 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 00000 PETER A SANTRACH RONALD L OTTEN MELISSA A KREIMER SANTRACH SUSAN K OTTEN 1700 BOHNS POINT RD 1655 BOHNS POINT RD WAYZATA MN 55391 WAYZATA MN 55391 Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases.Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available.The viewer should understand,however,that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties,either express or implied,or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. Hennepin Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Date: 3/20/2019 205 3 2 25 - 1500 is 1536 Pa Fri far . 1520 .AI r _ 11111$111 -: 1540 01 1111111 1580 op . ................................:„.........„.............................,.„,„,..„..,.,„:"::..........,-„......,....:„:.„...,,,....., S Y t-SI 625 (' 1620 tti iii nlJO- 1635 III a, 160 < 1545 g R `_ -i{447,0*„.. 1700 P? � 1655 cri 1725 is 1720 4at 4A� " ` - y„a-$ s : f ..y s " a 3� x1 ,- } ."'""g_.11., § Buffer Size: 500 0 50 100 200 Feet Map Comments: I I II I 1 1 ) I 1600 Bohns Point Road This data (i) s furnished 'AS IS' with no repesenationasto completeness or accuracy; (i)is furnished with no warranty of any knd; and (ii) is notsuitable for legal,engineering or surveying purposes.Hennepin County shag not beliableforanydamage,injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information,contact Hennepin County GlS Office 300 6th Street South,Minneapolis,MN 55487/gis.info@hennepin.us Date Application Received: 03/20/19 O�T Date Application Considered as Complete:03/20/19 60-Day Review Period Expires: 05/19/19 s � To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members < o� Dustin Rief, City Administrator gksHo�� From: Melanie Curtis, Planner h'1GG Date: 15 April 2019 Subject: #LA19-000024, Streeter&Associates o/b/o Peter& Nicole Thomas 1385 Orono Lane, Variances Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting variances to rebuild an existing patio and add new stoops within the 75-foot setback. Staff Recommendation: Planning Commission should evaluate the practical difficulties and make a recommendation.. Background The home on the property was originally built in 1927 and is almost entirely within the 75-foot setback from the lake. The existing lakeside patio was constructed over a basement level well room;the cap to the well room is leaking and the owner needs to repair the area. Since the existing patio needs to be removed to conduct the repairs,the applicant proposes a reconfiguration of the patio to add landings under new lake side doors,within the required lake yard; a variance is necessary. The existing hardcover level will be reduced. *Please see the applicant's reconciliation of the hardcover percentage inconsistencies between the 2002 and 2019 surveys.The lot area discrepancy between the two surveys is not uncommon, however it is noteworthy that the hardcover square footage is consistent. Planned improvements include a reconfiguration of the patio, addition of two gravel areas within a bluestone edging. The gravel is not considered hardcover. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Section 78-305 -Setbacks: LR-1A Required Existing Proposed Street/Rear 50' 116.8' No Change West Side 30' 65' No Change Lakeshore 75' House 52.3' House—No Change Patio 43' Patio—No Change The average lakeshore setback for this property is set by a line Average Lakeshore drawn between the adjacent homes at 1387 Orono Lane and 1380 Orono Lane.The entire home on the subject property is situated lakeward of the average lakeshore setback line. FILE#LA19-000024 15 April 2019 Page 2 of 5 Section 78-305 -Lot Area/Width: LR-1A Lot Area Lot Width Required 87,120 s.f. (2.0 acres) 200' Actual 55,000 s.f. (1.2 acre) 240'@ 75'/±360' @ OHWL Section 78-1680 and 78-1700—75-FOOT ZONE Hardcover Calculations: Stormwater Total Area in Allowed Existing 75-foot Proposed 75- Overlay District 75-foot Setback Hardcover Hardcover foot Hardcover Tier Zone 0 s.f. 3,359 s.f. 3,203 s.f. Tier 1 26,672 s.f. (0%) (12.59%) (12%) Applicable Regulations: 75-foot Hardcover and Lake Setback Variances (Sections 78-1680&78-1279) The existing patio improvement is entirely within the 75-foot lake setback where neither structure nor hardcover is permitted.The applicant is proposing to reconfigure the existing patio hardcover to better serve the property, however variances are necessary due to the location within the 75-foot setback. The reconfigured patio will not encroach closer to the lake and will result in a decrease in hardcover. Governing Regulation:Variance (Section 78-123) In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located.The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. According to MN §462.537 Subd. 6(2)variances shall only be permitted when: 1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance.Though the variances are minimal,and are generally consistent with the intent of the ordinance the Planning Commission should determine if relocation of hardcover areas is consistent with the Ordinance. The intent of the lake yard setback is to preserve the natural lakeshore and not permit hardcover in this area. 2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The requested variances are consistent with the residential goals within the comprehensive plan. This criterion is met. 3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the official controls; The use of the property remains residential. FILE#LA19-000024 15 April 2019 Page 3 of 5 The proposed improvements are residential in nature, reasonable from a residential scope. b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; The applicant requires a solution to the failing well room cap which will protect the home; the proposed reconstructed patio with landings do not result in an expansion of hardcover within the 75-foot setback. The existing patios and basement well room were not created by the current owner; and c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The variances to permit reorientation of the patio structure within the 75-foot setback will be more functional, do not result in an expansion of the nonconformity, and will not change character of the locality.This condition is met. Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be granted as follows: 4. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Economic considerations have not been a factor in the variance approval determination. 5. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn.Stat. §216C.06,subd. 2,when in harmony with Orono City Code Chapter 78.This condition is not applicable. 6. The board or the council may not permit as a variance any use that is not permitted under Orono City Code Chapter 78 for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. This condition is not applicable, as a lakeshore patio is an allowed accessory use in the LR-1A District. 7. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling.This condition is not applicable. 8. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property.The property is an existing lot of record,the home on the property has existed for nearly 100 years, and the property contains a large number of mature trees for screening.The topography of the property increases as it moves away from the lake and the owner feels the proposed improvements are necessary for access and are logical and will not adversely impact adjacent properties. This criterion is met. 9. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which the land is located.The applicant's proposal does not appear to be out of character with the area. The elevation of the patio area and the existing vegetation screen the improvements from the lake, the proposal does not involve an expansion of the nonconformities,only a reorientation,and will not encroach nearer to the lake than the existing.This criterion is met. 10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Granting a lake setback variance and hardcover variance to allow the reconstruction and reorientation of the patio within the 75-foot lake setback is reasonable and necessary to preserve the property rights of the owner. 11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. Granting the lake setback variance and hardcover variance to allowing the existing patio to be reconstructed and reconfigured as proposed will not adversely impact health, safety, comfort or morals, or in any way be contrary to the ordinances. FILE#LA19-000024 15 April 2019 Page 4 of 5 12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. The applicant has demonstrated practical difficulties which support granting the lake setback and hardcover variances to permit the reconstruction of the lakeside patio and landings within 75 feet of the OHWL.This statement is true. The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. Practical Difficulties Statement Applicant has provided supporting documentation regarding the applicable Practical Difficulties attached as Exhibit B, and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. Practical Difficulties Analysis The intent of the applicable ordinance is to not have hardcover within the 75 lake yard. Existing hardcover is permitted to be replaced, in-kind. The proposed reconfiguration and removal of some existing hardcover seems to support this intent. The variance process is to preserve the use of the property where practical difficulties exist. The protected use of the property is a residential dwelling, not accessory patios. The addition of patio areas to the lake yard seems to be a convenience not supported by practical difficulties. A better solution, if the Planning Commission and Council support the reconfiguration, would be to initiate an ordinance amendment that allows for the reconfiguration of hardcover within the lake yard. Engineer Comments The City's engineer has reviewed the plans and found no issues of concern. Public Comments To date, no public comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission find that that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner which is not permitted by an official control? 2. Does the Planning Commission find that the variance(s), if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood? 3. Does the Commission find it necessary to impose conditions in order to mitigate the impacts created by the granting of the requested variance(s)? 4. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation Planning Staff recommends the planning commission evaluate the practical difficulties and make a recommendation regarding the request. List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Exhibit B. Practical Difficulties Documentation Exhibit C. 2002 Survey Exhibit D. 2019 Survey—Corrected Lot Area FILE#LA19-000024 15 April 2019 Page 5 of 5 Exhibit E. Proposed Patio Plans Exhibit F. Submitted Hardcover Calculations Exhibit G. Building Official Comments Exhibit H. Aerial Photos Exhibit I. Property Owners List Exhibit J. Plat Map Land Use Application Summary Application Date: 03/20/2019 Address: 1385 ORONO LA WAYZATA, MN 55391 Parcel Number: 0211723340003 Land Use Number: LA 19-000024 Application Submitted By: Agent on behalf of property owner Owner: Name: PETER M &NICOLE M THOMAS Address: 1385 ORONO LA WAYZATA, MN 55391 Applicant: Name: Daren Willenbring Company: Streeter and Associates Address: 18312 Minnetonka Blvd Wayzata, mn 55391 dwillenbring@streeterhomes.com Contact Information: Associated Contact: Todd Irvine Todd@kslandarch.com Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Project Description: New lakeside patio-Lake/Front Yard Setback; Hardcover Land Use Application Type: Amendmend Application Appeal of Admin Decision Concept Application Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Application Subdivision Application -_I Subdivision Exception Vacation Application I Variance Application Applicant Signature: '� L�tl6 PP g 44 PRACTICAL DIFFICULTIES DOCUMENTATION FORM LA19-000024 1.The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the Zoning Chapter. Response:This home was built in 1927.The footprint and existing lakeside patio is mostly located within the 0-75'setback zone. Currently,the existing lakeside patio has a Well Room located under grade and approximately 1/3 of the patio which has a faulty cap/lid and is leaking water.The patio will need to be removed to allow access to the faulty lid in order to correctly apply a waterproof membrane.The proposed new patio will generally be in the same location except and is slightly altered to allow a means of egress to the 2 new permitted patio doors. 2.The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to his property not created by the landowner. Response:The existing home built in 1927 had a Well Room located at the SW corner of the house and is 2'under grade and the existing 1/3 of the patio.The concrete cap of this well room is not properly waterproofed and is leaking water into the home.The homeowners wish to remove the existing patio in order for Streeter and Associates to waterproof the existing Well Room cap,provide a means of egress to the 2 new permitted patio doors while staying within the 3203 SF of hardcover approved in the 2005 variance. Also,there was an error on the survey from 2002 which calculated the property area within the 0-75'zone using the shoreline elevation of 927.43 instead of the OHWL of 929.40.This error caused the hardcover to be calculated at 10.79%.The correct hardcover amount using the OHWL of 929.40 was much higher in the revised 2019 survey.See existing Hardcover calculation worksheet. 3.The variance,if granted,will not alter the essential character of the locality. Response:The new proposed patio is generally the same footprint as the existing except it allow a means of egress to the 2 new permitted patio doors. 4.Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties if reasonable use for the property exists under the terms of the Zoning Chapter. Response: N/A 5. Practical difficulties include,but are not limited to,inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems.Variances shall be granted for earth sheltered construction as defined in Minnesota Statutes,Section 116106,Subd. 2,when in harmony with this Chapter. Response:The practical difficulty in this circumstance is that the current concrete cap which is 2'under grade and 1/3 of the existing patio is leaking water into the mechanical room of the home.The current patio will need to be removed in order to gain access to the cap and correctly waterproof it. Pictures of the water intrusion can be forwarded upon request.Also,a means of egress from the 2 new permitted patio doors will need to be established. The proposed new patio will allow Streeter and Associates to remedy the water intrusion as well as provide a means of egress from the 2 new doors while still complying with the max. 3203 SF of hardcover from the 2005 variance. 6.The Board of Appeals and Adjustments or the Council may not permit as a variance any use that is not allowed under this Chapter for property in the zone where the affected person's land is located. Response: N/A 7.The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. Response: N/A 8.The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property. Response: N/A 9.The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located. Response: N/A 10.The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. Response:The proposed new patio is very similar in size and shape of the existing patio except it provides a means of egress from the 2 new patio doors 11.The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health,safety,comfort,morals,or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. Response:The proposed new patio will not impair any of the fore-mentioned concerns regarding health,safety,comfort,etc. It will actually provide a safe means of egress from the 2 new doors as well as remedy a water intrusion issue 12.The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant,but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. .esponse:The granting of this variance will allow a water intrusion issue to be resolved as well as serving as a means of egress from the 2 new permitted doors. i KEMPER & ASSOCIATES INC BOUNDAR.RY & TOPOGRAPHY SURVEY OF LAND SURVEYING•ENGINEERING °„f LOT 1,_ ' & 3, HOMES ON BROWN'S BAY, 051 1 CITY OF ORINO, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA I °, ( 1385 ORONO LANE ) - o - REGISTERED LAND SURVEY'.No 1350 •: l't® g¢4. �.4:+0.,.., eesi, °RpNp LANE ____ \,� T _ 3 . Ill o\N� ..,o.,. µ RECORDED LEGAE DESCRIPTION t �0°�I ) I I01 I.. +. J , Tim 'iR`g 1 �� .\\ to i, 'F ' LOT I, ahs • V• IIL l' .1 rr '' SETBACK REQUIREMENTS I LOT 2 '/ ^� / .I m i m ?,..' .._ 1 ,.,(7:' _,,,,ti,) .7,7.,,,e,,. ,...., .4 1,7,:.,,,r,rtv..1,,L,„,::...„..,..,,.,„,.,......1.,,,,7, ,,, t�� °� 0_ 12.,._,. ...1 ,40.2N�t ES ON BROJ _ ./ �� — .-- t �:k1 ', n� tL, Olt k i, ' wYiM �'I l£i���I •.w 7 'j�p'a�.�\:n �-� !E� „„JB5 �/ b //// k ome ...�wwo a.rimw1• _..40411111 �I if srt//j . ea tpt I `�/ '''L` 4 p \ y I` N^\ ."""T''..'”" I ..v� � r_\ //0//' 3 -..K.,.1::::-T-:„.,,,,,, ..-:Z:."--,,,,,,,,,,11, , y�\ham 1 � �//!/. rt:u'� a'^""r- ` a4ONEII .�9; h. _`"'"" _ ' Pa, '145gritil ...._, /7 --,--, / KE MINNETONKA } `" .74140 a' 14.10N .M"a, /� , _ H>nn caw+cAEcuunays �,., GI� Y, � 'fir. �ys�� � - 777 .. /' ,t��z / S Iw' LEGEND sTa 3T v` • um, ..a, v t �ikTEK 'i my - j a wC I •. — -. � SxwFLT'E u7.NrF CM.r k'I a,. Fe.", ,,TT' 9 i u+. ,,,,.yrtrty $ ryryryryT ,aen wwo �a M1NN6�,a""n°u�. , K orr w*,is mau R CERTIFICATE OF SURVE ��°°� o h wwa° ;.��, m .= _ K:MPpERRar ASSOCIATES INC. BOUNDARY & TOPOGRAPHY SURVEY OF LOT 1, 2 & 3, HOMES ON BROWN'S BAY S' CITY OF ORONO, HENNEPIN COUNTY,II_NNES:T.A...„.... (N 325 ORONO urn) .. ; — (UPDATED wn3�ars u.02 3012) . , .liVI, Q itly : --_____ IEG 12202 IAND SLR`.EY Nw 1150 \\fit,' tiai:0,04.,"_-34:7.4 .1 irst.A....,,,,i.... 0,_.,..i..44-• _.... .......ANE -__, -..... „ w-a _.-, twil Cif(...,---.,w--- -... --:- ..-. --.......t ......„0. ./,........ ..,.... t,, �•1, 11 $I$ N!SW ILOT4!t uv /i s`� w. .rte- ��ti 1y„�—�21.� �,,� c�C1" j��.� as" anal ....Kir" a-----a �t ;.�` gie411, LAKE MINNETONKA M N-m L-76 MOM CROMAIrr MOH YAM LEAL ...o............,== _.r411.it ' =te , ='�aA�" %/ - Ai,�,a .krt ..�>.o....r....."._...a ..�.." F%;E �1 -`F, y est' w''.a �� >®.. •" ",. fvyi ;;.!- sem- CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY -"'� - amu.-�,,„ .............. D 1:11119% , ElUlt*/* i 1 / /y \ millAo . 0. .4:17PorV ( 1 'i,c4";ii Ar ct ,, ,...., 5 1 1 4 '0 II \ II '1 -I Iola is4w 1 I i likiiiii i 1 0%11 ii II 3\ 92 — iliki07 4 idatiu, z \ 41 11 ,t,t\l, 17111.„:"1111 11111": ' \ ! \ 1 ) 110, '.• I r . A 's 'm ..qg / ■ ... 11 (-----"'------ _. i .i- --?,,1 , 1,7 WO rafpW-Y I i E9 2,, 1 i i i ,iiillil 1385 0 e3o-ii SIDENCE ii.; !,1!.11 VAL .'it r ;-iall Orono, 3 i I. 1151111 THOMAS,_____REne City of Orono >-�oo� Hardcover Calculation Worksheet Property Address: 1385 ORONO LANE f`,KFS+�oR` Prepared by: Date: KEENAN & SVEIVEN, INC 3/20/2019 Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 1: EXISTING HARDCOVER In the following table identify all items of existing hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to site plan or survey (must accompany this form). Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict existing hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Total Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Survey (Square Feet) (Example) (Garage) (24'x 30') .(720 S.F.) A PORTION OF HOUSE FOOTPRINT 1489 S.F. B PORTION OF BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY 1022 S.F. C BOAT HOUSE 154 S.F. D REAR PATIO 390 S.F. E CONCRETE WALKS,STEP PADS,&STEPS 259 S.F. F STONE WALKS AND STEPS 27 S.F. G PERVIOUS SIDE DECK W/STEPS* 99 S.F. H RETAINING WALLS 74 S.F. I AIR CONDITIONERS 18 S.F. J S.F. K S.F. L S.F. M S.F. N S.F. O S.F. P S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. ✓ S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. (1) Total Existing Hardcover 3532 S.F. Excludable Hardcover(See City Code Sec 784684): G PERVIOUS SIDE DECK W/STEPS` 99 S.F. H RETAINING WALLS 74 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover 173 S.F. (3) Net Existing Hardcover [Subtract line(2)from line(1)] 3359 S.F. (4) Total Lot Area 26,672 S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [(3)_(4)] 12.59 % (Proposed Hardcover next page) Last Updated: July 2018 Note: This is an information sheet only, every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the information contained herein; however, if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code, the Code provisions will prevail. Page 8 of 9 City of Orono o1/4\ Hardcover Calculation Worksheet IProperty Address: 1385 ORONO LANE 2� c `'kFSF�o�E Prepared by: KEENAN & SVEIVEN, INC Date: 3/20/2019 Stormwater Quality Overlay District Tier: (Circle one) Tier 1 Tier 2 Tier 3 Tier 4 Tier 5 Step 2: PROPOSED HARDCOVER In the following table, identify all items of proposed hardcover on the property, keyed by letter to site plan or survey (must accompany this form). Include all existing hardcover items that are intended to remain, as well as all proposed hardcover items that will be added. Use as many lines as necessary to accurately depict proposed hardcover status of the property. For Tier 1 properties, identify any features by letter which are split at the 75' setback line and calculate hardcover square footage separately for each portion. Key to Total Hardcover Item (Describe) Length x Width Survey (Square Feet) (Example) (Garage) ; (24'x 30') (720 S.F.) A PORTION OF HOUSE FOOTPRINT 1489 S.F. B PORTION OF BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY 780.5 S.F. C BOAT HOUSE 154 S.F. o REAR PATIO 501 S.F. E CONCRETE WALKS,STEP PADS,&STEPS 247.5 S.F. F STONE WALKS AND STEPS 13 S.F. G PERVIOUS SIDE DECK W/STEPS* 99 S.F. H RETAINING WALLS 74 S.F. I AIR CONDITIONERS 18 S.F. J S.F. K S.F. L S.F. M S.F. N S.F. O S.F. P S.F. Q S.F. R S.F. S S.F. T S.F. U S.F. ✓ S.F. W S.F. X S.F. Y S.F. Z S.F. (1) Total Proposed Hardcover 337.6 S.F. Excludable Hardcover(See City Code Sec 78-1684): G PERVIOUS SIDE DECK W/STEPS* 99 S.F. H RETAINING WALLS 74 S.F. S.F. S.F. S.F. (2) Total Excludable Hardcover 173 S.F. (3) Net Proposed Hardcover [Subtract line(2)from line(1)] 3203 S.F. (4) Total Lot Area 26,672 S.F. Proposed Hardcover Percentage [(3)=(4)] 12 % Last Updated: July 2018 Note: This is an information sheet only, every effort has been made to insure the accuracy of the information contained herein;however, if any information is not consistent with provisions of the City Code, the Code provisions will prevail. Page 9 of 9 From: Rocier Peitso To: Melanie Curtis;Adam Edwards Subject: RE:Variance Grading Review-LA19-000024/1385 Orono Ln Date: Thursday,March 21,2019 4:19:09 PM Melanie, The only comments I have is: 1. The landing or floor on the exterior side of the patio door shall not be more than 73/4 inches (196 mm) below the top of the threshold provided the door does not swing over the landing or floor. 2. A building permit is required for the alterations. Roger From: Melanie Curtis Sent:Thursday, March 21, 2019 3:53 PM To:Adam Edwards<aedwards@ci.orono.mn.us>; Roger Peitso<rpeitso@ci.orono.mn.us> Subject:Variance Grading Review- LA19-000024/ 1385 Orono Ln Adam & Roger Please review the attached plan to construct a new patio and landings within the 75-foot setback. Setback and hardcover variances are requested. The landings are required due to a change from windows to doors. I'm looking for comments from you by or before March 27th if possible; this will go to PC on April 15th Thank you. Of1411W+' Melanie Curtis, Planner Direct 952.249.4627 Planning &Zoning Office 952.249.4620 2750 Kelley Parkway, Orono, MN 55356 Email: mcurtis@ci.orono.mn.us Website: www.ci.orono.mn.us All permitting is now done through our new online portal - LINK. y I I. .kr approximate average $ ` Lakeshore setback line 4,..xl,'''.,- S ® � 4...,;" fy . „,Je .ems.., '+ ' —,30111111F‘4414,-:-....-.", \ , tput,--11• i • ' , •‘:, ,'"ar.... ,,:ifii,l• 4,1: - A 4... A ',„0; ''... Ot i t'1 �� �# ' im � - ‘-'3,- 3� r 0i 1r $ �r,Iypx ,;di'- # g. .i #i..:'..•-, a °' ,,i a '14 , .,-� thder :'?-j + fie` r '' y t, i ., i' � . s., i, -lit' Q0- , c ' ' CIr . '• '';',.-1,..1',:-:,4:; ,. _ �4.e r s :AFy #„ ,' ,.S #, ,ry l' eyx � ° .x. 6 I , �Y 4y dt4' is9 � � .. �., 1 +y ,1 , �4, s,,� am= „sa, i y,::,1:-.„';;I:,%-4,1.,=,- a< rt t , f:. es•� ,,* 41' t / tr _s1" et ,, T+ 33' =. * .s ` $ { 13 M .# 'S, '' ` .ee r „• s 1c. *•,:••,•• M,••-` �sY ' wa,1` tar " ,rtikal.e`r, ,.•� ,} 4 ,� * 4** tiv*,$r b'r1`R*;?W .'e-',.-. p rfl�a , 'ktil: uin ' s RUN DATE:03/21/2019 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:1 38 02-117-23 34 0003 38 02-117-23 42 0013 NICOLE MARIE R THOMAS HENNEPIN CO REGIONAL RR AUTH 1385 ORONO LA 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 55391 ORONO MN 00000 PETER M&NICOLE M THOMAS HENNEPIN COUNTY 1385 ORONO LA REGIONAL RAILROAD AUTHORITY WAYZATA MN 55391 701 4TH AVE S SUITE 400 MINNEAPOLIS MN 55415 38 02-117-23 34 0004 DOUGLAS C MOEN TRUST 1387 ORONO LA ORONO MN 55391 DOUGLAS&JUDITH MOEN 1387 ORONO LA WAYZATA MN 55391 38 02-117-23 34 0005 CM3 LIVING TRUST 1389 ORONO LA ORONO MN 55391 CM3 LIVING TRUST 15407 MCGINTY RD W#28 WAYZATA MN 55391 38 02-117-23 34 0006 NORWEST BK MPLS-NTL ASC TRST 1395 ORONO LA ORONO MN 55391 THOMAS/RE0030297 PDS/TAX SERVICES 1301 BOWEN RDS#335 ARLINGTON TX 76013 38 02-117-23 34 0007 A F GREENE/R A GREENED FOX 1397 ORONO LA ORONO MN 55391 ALLISON GREENE ROGER GREENE&DAVID FOX • 1397 ORONO LA WAYZATA MN 55391 38 02-117-23 34 0008 K R KOKESH&B J CAVALANCIA 1399 ORONO LA ORONO MN 55391 KEVIN R KOKESH BARRY J CAVALANCIA 1399 ORONO LA WAYZATA MN 55391 38 02-117-23 34 0010 ROGER K&NANCY MCCABE 1265 SHORELINE DR ORONO MN 55391 ROGER K&NANCY MCCABE 1265 SHORELINE DR WAYZATA MN 55391 38 02-117-23 34 0011 B M MILLER&C R MILLER TRST 1325 SHORELINE DR ORONO MN 55391 MERISTEM C/O PHIL STROHM 601 CARLSON PKWH#800 MINNETONKA MN 55305 38 02-117-23 34 0012 LUKE BELTNICK REV TRUST 1380 ORONO LA ORONO MN 55391 LUKE BELTNICK 1380 ORONO LA WAYZATA MN 55391 38 02-117-23 34 0013 W J POPP&T E POPP 1305 SHORELINE DR ORONO MN 55391 WILLIAM J&TERI E POPP 1305 SHORELINE DRIVE WAYZATA MN 55391 Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases.Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available.The viewer should understand,however,that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties,either express or implied,or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. Hennepin Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Date: 3/21/2019 120 1385 MI 1225 M. 1391 0 17 V s 1265 5 r20) t ao tl 1305 '''-i 0 r" 1325 fur (7- 7j 1380 e, (tai 1k' „ . .. ..,.. , . . . ,..„ ..: . _. . ... _. . , . , .., .. : .._ .... .. , 4:, 0,„,,„,n :,, , , . . , . ,..„,,, 1401 1395 ; t p _ , NY :: ' , i h 1390 ' - w1� l � =ter r .r..' � « _ lliff , .1--.'"..!.1','H''''';1.- .'.,,-=, - t= . ; y r' ms" , ti:Y c k`' Buffer Size: 500 0 50 100 200 Feet Map Comments: IIIIIIIII 1385 Orono Lane This daa (i) b furn shed 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness oraccuracy; (i)is fumishedwithnowarranty of any kind; and (ii) is notsuitable for legal,engineering or surveying purposes.Hennepin County sisal not be liable for any damage,injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information,contact Hennepin CountyGiS Office 3006thStreesSouth,Minneapdis,MN55487/gis.infot hennepin.us Date Application Received: March 20,2019 Date Application Considered as Complete:April 1,2019 60-Day Review Period Expires: July 30,2019 To: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members � O`� Dustin Rief, City Administrator �kESHOl.:`" From: Jeremy Barnhart, Community Development Director Date: April 15,2019 Subject: #LA19-000025,Lakewest, LLC, 3245 Wayzata Blvd W, Preliminary Plat, Site Plan,Zone Change, and Interim Use Permit Public Hearing Application Summary: The applicant is requesting preliminary plat,Master Development Plan, zone change, and interim use permit approvals to facilitate the construction of a 244 unit apartment complex consisting of two 3 story buildings, parking, and other improvements. Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff supports the preliminary plat and zone change proposal. Staff recommends the Commission Table action on the Master Development Plan pending response to the comments below. Staff recommends approval of the Interim Use Permit, subject to MPCA comment on the Response Action Plan and approval of a development agreement. Background The property owners are proposing the development of 9.8 acre parcel with a 244 unit apartment complex. The project would include two 3 story buildings, parking, trails, utilities, including stormwater management,and landscaping. This project is adjacent to previously approved Eisinger Meadows(16-3822),a single family villa type development. This project was the subject of a sketch plan in November of 2018(LA 18-000079)where the owner proposed a 192 unit apartment/senior living project on the property. Council generally supported the project,but had concerns with the height of the building,then a single 4-story building. Density proposed at that time was 19.8 units per acre(192 units on 10 acres). The site is a former landfill, removal of that material will trigger an Interim Use Permit. Staff and the developer have been working with the MPCA to develop an appropriate plan for mitigating the landfill impacts. The project will require preliminary plat approval and rezoning to RPUD, which requires Master Development Plan approval. This memo reviews the preliminary plat, zone change, and site plan as one application. The Interim Use Permit is analyzed separately in this report. Proposal Buildings Building plans,dated March 20,2019 are provided on Exhibit B. There are two buildings proposed, labeled east and west. The west building is somewhat C shaped and includes commons area on the first and second floor. The eastern building is L shaped. Both buildings are three stories(excluding an underground parking level), and include a variety of housing units, including studio, one bedroom, one bedroom + den, and two bedroom units. The plans include a unit labeled "alcove FILE#LA19-000025 April 15,2019 Page 2 of 7 bedroom"in the western building. The Commission may desire additional clarification on this unit type. Both buildings include underground parking,though plans have not submitted for those levels for review to confirm the number of spaces. The plans indicate exterior materials to include a mixture of rock face block, face brick, and fiber cement siding and panels. Roofing is proposed as charcoal asphalt shingles. Balcony railing and windows will be black aluminum. Site Improvements Site improvements are included in the plans included as Exhibit C. Access to the development will be via a new north/south public street proposed as part of Eisinger Meadows. This road terminates in the surface parking lot proposed between the two buildings. At the sketch plan,it was suggested this road terminate in a cul de sac. This recommendation remains. The plans include a 161 space surface parking lot. Notations on the plan indicate 109 stalls in the east garage,and 127 stalls in the west garage. Total(underground and surface)parking stalls should be equal to 2 spaces per unit, or 488 spaces. The plans include a walking trail around the perimeter of the site. Sidewalks around the parking lot would connect to the trail. LOT ANALYSIS WORKSHEET RPUD Standards(Section 78-626) Multifamily developments RPUD District Proposed Flexibility Standard Lot Standards Required? Minimum site area 5 acres 9.8 acres No Sewer Availability Yes Yes No Hardcover 50% 163, 241 Sq ft, or No 36.2% Floor Area Ratio 1.0 maximum 0.62 (267,036 sq No ft over 9.8 acres) Minimum front building setback 35 feet 52 feet (East No (to internal streets): Bldg.) Minimum rear or side setback to 50 feet 52' (West Bldg., No Highway 12 69 feet East Bldg.) Minimum side yard setback: 35 Feet 100+feet No Wetland building setback: 25 feet 80' West Bldg, No 93' East Bldg Building Height: Maximum of 30 24.7 feet. See No feet Exhibit K Private Recreational Area 10%(42,688 sq ft) 25,142+trails To be verified Signage Master Plan Proposed FILE#LA19-000025 April 15,2019 Page 3 of 7 Landscaping Master Plan Proposed Modifications required Applicable Regulations: Development of a Planned Residential Unit Development is governed by Division 11 of the City Code, attached as Exhibit O. Interim Use Permit Land Alterations at the scale proposed and anticipated requires an Interim Use Permit as outlined in the attached Subdivision I of the City Code,Exhibit N. The subject site is a documented, closed landfill. In mitigating the landfill (removal of material), it is expected that import/ export of material will be in excess of 500 cubic yards. The removal/ mitigation of this material must be handled carefully to avoid contamination of the water table and surface waters. The developer has prepared and submitted a Response Action Plan(Exhibit H)to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency(MPCA)for review and comment. The MPCA will advise the City on the appropriateness of that response. Applicable Regulation: Interim Use Permit(Section 78-1726) The Planning Commission may recommend and the Council may grant an Interim Use Permit (IUP). On the basis of the application and the evidence submitted, the city council determines that the use will comply with the following: 1) The use will meet the general performance standards in section 78-916 of this chapter; The truck and excavation activity will be intense and may impact adjacent properties, though due to the separated nature of the property, these impacts will be minimal when compared to other parcels. 2) The use is allowed as an interim use in the applicable zoning district; The removal of fill is permitted. 3) The use will not delay anticipated development or redevelopment of the site; The activity is being done to support development of the site. 4) The use will not be in conflict with any provisions of the city code on an ongoing basis; This statement is true. 5) The use will not adversely affect the adjacent property, the surrounding neighborhood, or other uses on the property where the use will be located; The activity is being contemplated to address issues with soil quality. 6) The use will not impose additional unreasonable costs on the public; All costs are the responsibility of the applicant. Additional city resources are not contemplated. 7) The date or event that will terminate the use can be identified with certainty; The IUP will cease when the landfill is removed and the site restored to grade. 8) And the applicant agrees in writing to any conditions that the city council deems appropriate for the use, including a requirement for a financial security to ensure removal of all evidence of the use upon termination, and restoration of the site to prior or better conditions. The conditions shall be set forth in a development agreement between the property owner and the city, which agreement shall be recorded with the Hennepin County Recorder or Registrar of Deeds. A development agreement will be commenced between the property owner and the city as part of the overall site development. FILE#LA19-000025 April 15,2019 Page 4 of 7 IUP Recommendation. Staff supports the mitigation of the landfill, provided that response is supported by the MPCA. Staff recommends approval of the IUP,subject to approval or support of the Response Action Plan by the MPCA. Preliminary Plat,Zone Change,and Site Plan Analysis This proposal, with 244 units in two buildings, represents the single largest housing project in the City of Orono in many years. The Planning Commission should not forward the application to the City Council until it is comfortable in all aspects with the project. Comprehensive Plan density. The subject parcel is guided for high density residential (20-25 units per acre)in the draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan. While the plans show a density greater than what was proposed at the sketch plan (19.8 units per acre), the density is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The proposed density is 24.9 units per acre. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan has not yet been adopted by the City Council. This preliminary plat, zone change, and site plan cannot be approved until the Council has adopted the Plan. Roads/Access. Access to this site is via a public road that was originally anticipated for Eisinger Meadows, the adjacent single family development. The plans do not show a cul de sac at the end of this road. A cul de sac, meeting city code standards, should be added to the plans. As is proposed,turn around opportunities only exist within the private parking lot. Hennepin County has reviewed the proposed location of the road as it intersects with County Rd 112. Their initial comments are attached as Exhibit J. Most of their comments reference the Eisinger Meadows project, though the comment on the turn lanes applies to this project. Staff recommends that any motion of approval include a condition that all County comments are satisfied. Building height. The building height was a major issue at the sketch plan level. While the facade of the building measures 30 feet from first floor to midway between the peak and the eave, due to the cuffing of the building into the existing grade, the defined height is actually 24.7 feet. The building height standard is met. Landscaping. A Landscaping plan has been submitted. The RPUD standards require a specific amount of landscaping, based on the greater of the following: 1 tree per 1000 sq. ft. of building footprint, or 1 tree per 40 feet of lot perimeter, whichever is greater, and based on the following table. Minimum Tree and Shrub Requirements Vegetation Type Size Quantity Overstory 2.5-inch bb One tree per 1,000 gross square feet of building footprint deciduous trees (Caliper) area or one tree per 40 lineal feet of site perimeter, whichever is greater. Coniferous trees 6-foot height Minimum of 30 percent of required overstory trees must bb be coniferous Understory shrubs 3-gal. potted or One shrub per 300 gross square feet of building footprint 18-inch area or one shrub per 30 lineal feet of site perimeter, whichever is greater. FILE#LA19-000025 April 15,2019 Page 5 of 7 Ornamental 1.5-inch bb Not required; but two ornamental deciduous trees may deciduous trees (Caliper) be substituted for one required overstory deciduous tree (maximum substitution equals 25 percent of required overstory deciduous trees) Credits for existing trees:The city council shall have sole discretion whether credit shall be granted for existing healthy trees The perimeter is 3,648 feet,requiring 91 trees. The building footprint area is 89,012 sq.ft. (47,286 sqft west Building, 41,726 sqft east building), requiring 89 trees. The landscape plan quantity analysis combines the trees proposed for Eisinger Meadows with those proposed for this project. This project requires 91 trees, preliminary review shows approximately 45 trees on the subject parcel. The landscaping plans should be separated, as landscaping (and corresponding security) will be required for both projects. As proposed,the landscape plan is not approvable. Additionally,the RPUD standards require landscaping in the parking lot: c. Interior parking lot landscaping. 1. All parking lots containing over 100 stalls shall be designed to incorporate unpaved, landscaped islands in number and dimension as required by the city. All landscape islands shall contain a minimum of 180 square feet. Islands which are necessary to promote the safe and efficient flow of traffic shall not be subject to the 100-stall standard and shall be required by the city when warranted. 2. Parking lot landscape areas, including landscape islands, shall be reasonably distributed throughout the parking lot area so as to break up expanses of paved areas. Parking lot landscape areas shall be provided with deciduous shade trees, ornamental or evergreen trees, plus ground cover, mulch and/or shrubbery as determined appropriate by the planning commission. Parking lot landscape trees shall be provided at the rate of one tree for each 15 surface parking spaces provided, or major fraction thereof.Parking lot landscaping shall be contained in planting beds bordered by a raised concrete curb or equivalent approved by the planning commission. Parking lot islands should be located within the parking lot, attached Exhibit L is provided as a minimum recommendation. This may impact the location of the underground retention system. Parking. The site plan should be adjusted to accommodate parking stall standards of 9 feet wide and 20 feet deep. The drive aisle can be 24 feet wide, rather than the 26 feet shown. Plans for the garages should be submitted to verify number of spaces and maneuverability. Parking for attached family dwelling units is equal to 2 spaces per unit, or 488 spaces. The plan will need to be adjusted to provide the required spaces. Dumpster/trash. It is assumed that the trash receptacles will be located within the garage areas, though no detail has been provided. Further detail of the trash removal system/storage will need to be provided. Fire department. The plans shows two fire hydrants. The Fire Chief will need to verify the number and location of hydrants. The Fire Chief will also need to verify accessibility for all structures. Plans have been submitted to the Fire Chief, staff anticipates responses prior to the item being presented to the City Council. FILE#LA19-000025 April 15,2019 Page 6 of 7 Private recreational space. The RPUD requirement is that a development provide 10%of the land for private recreational space. The Private recreational space should be shown on the site plan. Staffs interpretation of the private recreational area is about 25,000 sq ft, shown on the building plans, Exhibit B. This requirement is critical given the density proposed,and the lack of trails* to connect the property to the community wide trail system and public parks. The proposal shows three recreational areas; one the south side of the east building; one north of the east building; and one just west of the entrance road. While the improvement details have not been submitted, staff envisions for a development of this scale a variety of activities for a variety of ages, which may include a small playground, a sport court, and a pool/ water plaza. Trails are appropriate for a portion of the requirement,but should not be substituted for all of the requirement. The Planning Commission should provide comment on the recreational requirement. *The Eisinger Meadows preliminary plat included a requirement for a 10' wide trail easement along the northerly 10 feet of that development, along the south edge of Cty Rd 112/ Wayzata Blvd ROW. That project did not propose the construction of that trail, or connections to the existing trail system. Utilities. Water and Sewer will be extended from the Orono Preserve project to the east. The City engineer has provided comments related the utility systems. These should be addressed prior to review of the project by the City Council. Watershed/ Wetland buffer encroachment. A portion of the stormwater management system is within the wetland buffer. Support for this encroachment should be provided by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD). The MCWD t will need to approve the stormwater management plan and wetland impacts proposed. Grading. The grading plan shows a new retaining wall at the south end of the site,near the parking lot. Grading near the perimeter of the site, including at the retaining wall, will impact native vegetation that cannot be replaced and should be kept to a minimum. Sign Plan. The applicant has provided a rendition of a monument sign (Exhibit G) promoting the Eisinger Meadows development. No signs are proposed for the buildings. All signs will be subject to the City Sign Code, unless specifically addressed in a resolution. Fees. This project will be subject to fees: Park Dedication, Water and Sewer Trunk, Stormwater and Drainage Trunk fees,and SAC fees. These fees will be calculated prior to the item moving to the City Council. Engineer Comments. City engineer comments are provided as Exhibit I and should be addressed. Public Comments To date,no comments have been received. Issues for Consideration 1. Does the Planning Commission have any comment regarding the architecture/ design of the buildings 2. Does the Planning Commission have any comment on the Private recreational Space 3. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? Planning Staff Recommendation FILE#LA19-000025 April 15,2019 Page 7 of 7 Interim Use Permit. Staff recommends approval of the Interim Use Permit, subject to MPCA comment on the Response Action Plan and approval of a development agreement. Preliminary Plat, Master Development Plan, and Zone Change. Staffs review yields a number of issues that, when addressed, are likely to impact the design layout of the site, including cul de sac placement,number of parking spaces,storm water management,landscaping,including parking lot islands, and private recreation. Staff recommends tabling of the Master Site Plan approval until those comments can be addressed. If the Planning Commission is comfortable moving the project forward, staff recommends the following conditions: 1. Submission of parking garage layouts 2. Addition of a cul de sac at the southern terminus of the new access road 3. Redesign of parking lot to include: a. 488 parking stalls(minus the number provided in underground garages) b. Parking lot islands as suggested by Exhibit L c. Parking stall sizes and drive aisles to meet code. 4. Approval of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan 5. Hennepin County approval of access 6. Landscaping plan prepared that addresses RPUD standards 7. Clarification of trash removal system and storage 8. Conformance with the Fire Chiefs comments 9. Programmed recreational space satisfactory to the City Council 10. Conformance with the City Engineer's comments 11. Conformance with the MCWD's comments and permitting requirements List of Exhibits Exhibit A. Application Summary Exhibit B. Elevations and floor plans Exhibit C. Plat, site,utility, landscaping Plans Exhibit D. Narrative Exhibit E. Conservation Design Exhibit F. Parking Lot lighting Plan Exhibit G. Monument Concept Exhibit H. Landfill Response Action Plan Exhibit I. City Engineer Memo Exhibit J. Comments from Hennepin County Exhibit K. Building Height Analysis Exhibit L. Parking Lot Island recommendation Exhibit M. Mailing information Exhibit N. Land Alteration Code Exhibit 0. RPUD Standards Exhibit P. Staff Comments-applicant response Land Use Application Summary Application Date: 03/20/2019 Address: 3245 WAYZATA BLVD W LONG LAKE, MN 55356 Parcel Number: 3211823140002 Land Use Number: LA19-000025 Application Submitted By: Owner: Name: LAKEWEST LLC Address: 14525 HIGHWAY 7 #265 MINNEONKA, MN 55345 Applicant: Name: LAKEWEST LLC Company: Address: 14525 HIGHWAY 7 #265 MINNEONKA, MN 55345 Contact Information: Associated Contact: Perry Ryan perry@lwestdev.com Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Associated Contact: Project Description: Eisinger Flats Land Use Application Amendmend Application Type: Appeal of Admin Decision Concept Application 1_ Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Application 41 Subdivision Application u Subdivision Exception LII Vacation Application Variance Application Li Applicant Signature: PRELIMINARY PLANS For EISINGER FLATS Orono, Minnesota a ;- ...., m f"F;;= a. �� I �• ..t .. Y in ::,> ' M m OWNER: t .s sw • 1 r'" q "E. .,v.... ;, a L525 Highway LLC f ua'. — " 14525 7,Suite 265 ; 1 .. ., , Moret a, N 55345 ° (952)830-3000 a -• ..,._. a N, `. q s ENGINEER. ''"2 1 F fi t.9`� `1141,14S1, ' i a € 8 Ryan Engineering f•, [ .. +-� ,?e 1a LAND OEVELOYMINT sEav CEs S d'4a� v q `(�.' V (952)221-3700 s �' .. 41,,sK'.'S '® / f #� A"s, (L01 s y 3 w,' .t. EISINGER FLATS 4 , , .r"" ^.-a c . -,;. ;. PRELIMINARY SUBM/TTAL 3/20/19 ;, ,,,. ..;ry:°..�,�, `; 'it ,.:� :`7 ;,,- UPDATED SUBMRTAL 4/1/19 S(TE LOCATION MAP INDEX SHEET NO DESCRIPTION COVER SHEET S-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY P-1 PRELIMINARY PLAT-OVERALL 100 SCALE P-2 SITE&UTILITY PLAN P-3 GRADING&DRAINAGE PLAN P-1 EROSION CONTROL PLAN P-5 SVW'PP-NARRATIVE AND NOTES P-6 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS-CITY OF ORONO P-7 CGNSTRUCROY DETAILS-CITY OF ORONO P-B CONSTRUCTION DETAILS-CITY OF ORONO L-I PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN LEGEND a▪ MUTT 1.2 i r op-->— saanorr saw MO x xm.a oa o wlw WAYZATA BLVD D 0.41.111180011 ori m WI OM CM 'k i( ..c jr. 1.-‘.. r- / .r..a u,urr rtmn - i ,fl }eR- +4 cn 4Y } >z romwaraw�a. '41.{,( ''.1- '3" . ¢�46-" A. Yt' " . ® __. omr..ArAu "" i 8 W t ,,E-1--, F -. 37' /' _� gal,Of.NraNrff.AaORM s OL441011r oo •A x m NOTE COSMO D_IORRIC.SURVEY YRFPMeD BY CRCNBERO It +J .loam f ASDCYAT6 i • aPipl a PRE1•213. am strum Gam.{N 1,Sc ' 112E ON./ rid E 11144 R BD ,al IM GR.,1 el..anon al IN SaN Y,.M A w.,:a4 �,v"m�.B San ate..el t as p aM nynmy..41Bl..t u.,..al 112. rpN b12a ]ItM l.emtn.sew u.el us lq,.ry lm lido \ ... RerA Ale w N.hrarba M ae.arxlr�¢Mut.Dr i. .lB Nemm.peMaGprnrq YlSa b.rr ad rda tN Dort al.de,at 1.nn m.tre u.sew Be.w Nd-q tx ma w one.F.el.eu 1pn.a,.wm ~ ki"=q C a perA.Bar,,It a 4e..r.r.l tat B M s.Nen 3L TewVtli„e Rat4 meq.]J 1M M iIn sIna al .vaee YWM uxe ranct M \. " mhmw,i+f rO.MontBra,z a 1Oa.Nero 1.NE. M horn de pant b ate B.m..Aa ..... No.MOO eaat le Y sa*,.I a old HrlyyArea. and 1R.rc.mA.bp..m....1....Iro M a otl odd *Away mM ha No lb.M.a 4e M,t M.of No Or.WrC.rn MR.W C e/Nowa SaNNW.rr Wang da A.awar w m B.Cut M ad b 1M d.l;BMe `S Om* peFW.I.,t el GI.,E0102 Fowl 11 a SpaMrA a Tram..n CON a Way Imt tla n la4 6 ze� n-131. (J o uru.cordam • lar Nolo d Im Nolo mw B...ra Ma..toad wen m wow.dawn T. ro loo aeD1. dalr el w ma.d.ar.d I g wpw. cod- a al Ne N 9 b4y�ohmq1yy epoema '%2: Fbrndbn Y M1em Harr.fa R dad d pupal .,�. .at. yra npanoas OfloodraplwOn* 6 3L fz,re nDuh II�N*..t.. a ¢¢ Aa had .1N1 B fawn M py 1...1.....3 I 1 Op.. KIT 02122 kbL 1B•MAC 1.11E N M1�,. . eMaa KMn CAMPION a::"'N �„. EISINGER MEADOWS EXISTING CONDITIONS I �ENGINEERING —..."a--- SERVICES , ^ ;,11 a:.'»L.wa..a.axD.�. LAKE WEST,LLC `S01 I p OW Hyl �i SERVICES,INC L - 3/20/9 NIP' •-...* yma,..too*-Us t„m, oofs ORONO,MN Z1)209 RIM ENOREERNO DEVELOPMENT DATA ../.7 \ 1 ZONING EXISTRIG ZONING 11,0 ON..Approval, Rya n . I PROPOSED ZONING RPUO Engineering \ i MINIMUM LOT REQUIREMENTS 0/11.1 AS) LAND MELO,MENT SERVICES \ 1 FRONT SETELAGIG 25 FEET FROM LOT LINE - NEAR/SIDE SETBACK 5 FEET 19655 Walerlord F1 BUFFER 10 FEET FROM WE11.0 BUFFER Excelsor,MN 55331 WAYZATA BLVD W.-)t.).' 40 FROM WAVIZATA BLVD OCR 1121 (952)221-3700 1 1 1 . .,,. , ;;;-, „ ...Kg./ r r r ir L...re.•-ir , '.1 ,1 olei Pr II Or e v ow r uws revlo s Approval) RRETREVITIO'NAL't... 10.5 NET EFFVELOP:03E1FL,ATS1 SINGLE FAMILY VILLAS(Eger Me '.' 6'4:PI GROSS SIT6 ARE, I Vi.'fal. ' .N;L:TBILA"tort.7.:FM ..-'''''''''''''''''''' - 1 71 4 4 A JAA A • 4A d -'/' 950.1 81.0.2 2 70 ac I ...h..ii•,g.,.. MULTIPLE FAMILY FLATS DATA , 2`2"2''..' , • , .464:7=FAIsVArs.&w.,, c --exx.—...,—,—.... .,,, 910.3 EISINGER N R// M — s',...,-1 ,, • ""-',.., ; OuTTOT G1.153 W.. 202 54 5 0,307 0 1E.Weta 91 ir,0 54 5 FLATS 7 N PRE1501/9.5 MI:POW; v NET DEvELOPABLE RECREATIONAL AREA 0 I. 0 93 act 5. 957.9 Orono,MN PROPOSED KIF 1 00 ac 1 for PROVICEO REG AREA. . 1.IF NET DENS, LAKEWEST LLC N N 1 N 1 r .- r`‘.-. - t I \ \ N \ '-r, ' i, ,I PROPERTY ADDRESS profrel Ina \ \ \\ - -_. '‘ 11 ; 3245 WAYZATA BLVD WLST ORONO MN 55356 \ \,e, \ •''4, .notaa ii, 1 330 920 SF 30 55 AC x LEGAL DESCRIPTION NW* ' N ____ \ , I \ ) % sEE suRvEm NOM Rm.,OM. 999 9.968999951 -.. \ 119155918 F.2- 1:417____ Pet*.[NNW Orb,...pawl Ft..,B... BWAVI °mewl Preliminary Plat-----i--i-------- X i-.. p-i l 'i dr " ,/,, ../.:,=...„. w: I /� �T' � � Iiyr � �! �i0 �jGP Ijt >®0 p1er.200 11/00111300.®003 y/ � /1111,AOLWAVOrA*0010,A1104901II1 ! " ii �iiyI �, b• oem � E ,..,:/ ngineering•/ e b � oor�,or.,. r �/ wI ! ExcelorIAN it 0,, .1 frsi AVII ha ,11 10655 Wert ord Fl 55331 3700 r' 'ak, 7„.,.............,...„....,, ...,. r� .:' / .ti I I i^ / I ��i' reaI� .r.• / � NIM w. ..w.�,.. ,1 �I 1 _ t -'� EISINGER 1 .�, FLATS 11 TMcv �' I : ______ r 13 >I for I --1 m re or I'� AKEINEST,LLC M Net \GLS, \\\ 1 , yap. •filn Far arm qtr.. vI t r r..a", Dew_ `y } \ rent tea... GENERAL UTILITY NOTES LEGEND Preliminary `,�'° Site and INE CONITACIIIN SnALL parr ANDNO/na....9aµ. COMM. lir DE a a ur K . „M..9r R�ra OUTSIDE .a s„a__ !� Utility Plan _ FOY__ IST VIM TIE_ .00.,.9.., I.nu.s 9.mc, rao.r.9cvrwriora m.:M DE .urc,.0 WO,O.,.k0W.I.LOC.ruv.PMTY BE ?m ELAM.m.s„Usm.. MUM 1rtr 510011 WW2 —<a I. ...SEI/O1—.— r.o. LA.Trcor rINCLUDING`M .ADDIS.. Au. 0r.. ..,,s. .0,09.,ss,..r.c 9w,ff,,ass.,,..�00t..:E ., xrct MAY a �.�- � :y .q MT/011.Irr.��, ,�a� r r� P-2 rreas / 1 / Old ,.i ® a4 : a �� .�.o f� ' 01 •i,,,i,ri, 1,d=,® eg1,,50_44p pa®k u om• ►\ Ryan '''' /�r �A t♦ 910%004F/11 1 1 #40 4 4&ol - rdil'`' Engineering (� � IOee% Il�yll� iltf 1, �! 1 �%� �i � l�ii,�'� m � �11 11��•�,� �. �! i•` i 1,. /, ` „NooE�To..EN..E.N��. jr/401044249)°,11/019,00FA0111 i, .J •�� jIErAIP A,I 1Mr4�� v �'n ' s .•I¢ /-"�;Arr -:- nassweterforant(�,�.. i'A�. r- ���I//� 0 l .s2=S=am!/i%���- we.zm..... eareao ay.— eeeoe Ardr JI '1 moo: .1OP a � fp OWN W. • 1 . .9---.....--,2._- maw 3 \LIFO \, EISINGER t 2• .,, - 1 FLATS I } 1, ssro, 1 1 , Orono.MN \ " s"t.e,.e 11 , for 71 74 1 ‘ • 1 .1 % 1,• LAKEWEST,INC N N NI, a ENT Pre*,N. N r- ro N INem N { `� 1 "" N Ar oo NCy T, IT .""" �s i) f v N.VO 1 I N1 a� a 1 For. \ \i \\ 1 _ Construction GENERAL GRADING AND DRAINAGE NOTES -comc,ms.ucwucroa'..son-,,,,,.uFp/,/run Tn..o...r du-.s,-ow, s a...tir sT,.a,s LEGEND Preliminary __ LOWS Grading COV1RACTOR SMALL YEW lar MOT RE.41/105.OF Mr °,14T..'..e,..'''7.e " re...or... _= X Plan . ..m: .�..ortfr ,.,.rCROWIEe.,N.,•09.'ramOR —Po.- T.,.. link.rw OR 9000-Fliall BLANNET OR SOO RI RCMP..NM Ille AIM.Ewa NT. ALL NOW av NM 9.41 CO./011/TO Me 122..Al.SIORIMITER POW SANTAINY WW1--4- ME".,...m._.. Turk o....®..cT-,.,.o,a. _ o.,,.,.o.anw do./...y. -1 -....- P-3 Ilisn o m.m.x eo0122•n - � / 0- f � ' •r . ®'ssir iii 6 p ps/ 41%§0ci ! i � ' , !F±r r� Iii� �,-i►iq.. -s� S� e strwas® tiNI ; `a�i1iE1 o.,aa CO-10-11. RR '111 1� 0. EISINGER V t 2 1 1 FLATS 1 Orono,MN r 1 1 ' 10 1 i for LAKsr,LLC l 1 . .v \ M A.stxF (MOM Ey 11 N $ b. M N�V•� 1 ' `\ 1` L Y♦ kerMcm ‘,./// EROSION CONTROL QUANTITIES 'uv :... c ND. Z607 Li x.. \\ r I `� LEGEND ""'""' --- GENERAL EROSION CONTROL NOTES DIMS ,,.m^«� .GRADIS~� Preliminary .o,TSPO .m.�O.MPM .O..m,,..,.O.OanwOEMS1..� '° -•..- a. MMU ,,,..L� Erosion ToEMOSE • a � ro MALL m Control ,,. W SY RE arv^;"°BE MOMENT.O WWI ten. �..a Plan o PRCYR.O SPOT M.N. gr ffo n.T n•61,977,Va,.«e o.. SEM fiM E.POW MALL OE �"`"-217.--17—.,,�.. — owu WN MELT, RAM nwK ME OR ®.E 1. — P-4 O 2010 RYAN ENO0031.03 GENERAL SWEPT REQUIREMENTS&NOTES: PART IV CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REQUIREMENTS FINAL STABILIZATION-PART IV.G Rya IDENTIFIEDTHE CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBCONTRACTORS INVOLvED WITH A CONSTRUC7101/THAT DISTURBS SITE SOIL OR WHO IMPLEMENT INngineering TIVITY THE PERMITEE MUST IMPLEMENT THE SWPPP AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS PART.THE THE CONTRACTOR MUST ENSURE FINAL ST.ILIZATION OF THE SITE ACCORDING WITH THE THE STORM WATER POLLUT.N PREVENTION AAA((SWPPP,MUST COMPLY WITH WWITHHTXON(NOT GENERAL w DAYS AAFTER N.G.rwu s.BILIZATONi IS MUST oR LANOOe,LIOP,,i TIE: Ris7 s REQUIREMENTS OF THE NATIONAL POLLUTION TEM NPGES) RELEVANT MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS AND ACCEPTED ENGINEERING PRACTICES. WITHIN 7 DAYS AFTER SELLING THE SITE OR PORTION OF NE SITE TO ANOTHER PARTY A AGENCYGENERAL PERMIT DATED AUGUST 1,2013AL COPY OF THIS NOT/PERMIT MODIFICATION FORM MUST GO TO THE NEW OWNER THE GOVERNING HAVING JURISDICTION CONCERPAINR NING EROSIAGES ON AND SEOIMAND ANY EBTATOS EROSION PREVENTION PRACTICES-PART IV.B ER THAT fl655W.M 53I CONTROL, sPECI I RTEE(SI MUST PLAN FOR AND IMPLEMENT APPROPRIATE BMPS SUCSPECIFICALLY ADDRESS ANY REMAINING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. Excelebr,MWater- 55331 H AS CONSTRUCTION PHASING.1..EGETATVE BUFFER STRIPS.HORL2ONTAL SLOPE GRADING. (952)221-3700 INSPECTION ANO MAINTENANCE OF PART IV.E AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION PRACT.S THAT MINIMIZE EROSION AS NECESSARY TO COMPLY WITH THIS PERMIT AND PROTECT CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY INFORMATION: DELINEATED LEGS WITH FLLAGSSTAKES.TSIGNS,SILT FENCE ETC.)ON THE PROJECT SWPPP CONTACTS: PROJECT NAME:EISINGER Furs SITE BEFORE WORK BEGINS L.'''.""'B. PROJECT TYPE:MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTAL PROJECT LOCATION 3245 WAYZATA BOULEVARD,ORONO,MN 55558 3EROSION,BUT NO LATER THAN END OF THE NEXT WORK TAY WHEN EARTHWORM lR TOR awan.✓e e.r CUMLILATVE IMPERVIOUS5uRFACE TSSENAME ACTIVITIES WILL CEASE FOR AT LE.7 14 DAYS. NGUCRtE.w AGGPEGATEY STOCKPILES ADDRESS TOTAL SITE ACRES 23.18 ACRES STOCKPILES,DEMOLITION CONCRETE STOCKPRES. TNO STOCKPILES, SMIIAR SUR CONTACT IP ONE FACES N H 4+• NUMBER OF ACRES TO BE DISTURBED 72 ACRES CONSTRUCTED BASE COMPONENTS OF OS,PARKING LOTS AND 51 POST-CONSTRUCTION ACRES OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACE 3 s*TTEE(SI MUST SPRE-CONSTRUCTION ACRES OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACE 0.0 ACRES ARE EXEMPT FROM THIS TABILIZE ���° E NORMAL WETTED PERIMETER OF ANY N TOTAL NEW IMPERVIOUS SURFACE ARA 553 ACRES TEMPOARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCH OR SWALE THAT DRAINS WATER FROMoNNEg, ANY PORTON OF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE,OR DIVERTS WATER.OUND THE SITE. LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT RECEIVING WATERS 111-1IN 200 LINE,FEET FROM THE GE,OR FR01.4 A PONT OF LAKE PROPERTY AMN 55345 SPECIALO TTIMPAIRED wAER. TO A ,FEET FTER TBE EISINGERMINNETDNNAME OF WATER NO YES COMPLETED SURFACE WATER. LGNNGTDABDRFLLZATION OF THE L.T 200 EwAER. DATES OF CONSTRUCTION SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES-PART IV.0 CONTACT PEERS BOWL 95.2-65.3-1359 FLATS ESTIMATED COMPLETOFJ. 7,,/JIIM20 t TTEE(51 MUST EMPLOY SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES AS NECESSARY TO MINIMIZE SEDIMENT FROM ENTERING FACE WATERS,INCLUDING CURB AND GUTTERSYSTEMS AND STORM SEWER WLETS. SOIL INFORMATION Oros,MN 2. SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST BE ESTABLISHED ON,L DOWN GRADIENT THE PERIME PART III STORMWATER DISCHARGE DESIGN REQUIREMENTSPERIMETERS AND BE LOCATED UPGRADIENT OF ANY BUFFER TER for SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MU.BE IN PLACE BEFORE ANY UPGRADIENT LANGgM STURBNG ACTTES BEGIN. N THESE PRACTICES SHALL REMNN PLACE UNTIL SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION RESPorvSIB LrtIES t. THE OWNER AND CONTRACTOR ARE CO..MIMES AS DENTFIED BY THE NPDES PERMIT FINAL STABILIZATION HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED IN ACCORDANCE WRXPMT N.G. .. 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL ON SITE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE S BEEPERMITTEE(S) ADJUSTEDSOR REMOVED TO ACCOMODATENSHORRTT.TTERMAPRACTICES T SS AOT AsvE LAIKEWEbT,LLC 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PERSON KNOWLEDGEABLE At.EXPERIENCE0 IN TIE SHORT-TERA4 ACTIVITY HAS BEEN COMPLETED. APPLICATION OF EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MPS AND OVERSEE . TEMPORARY SOIL STOCKPILES MUST HAVE SILT FENCE OR OTHER EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT ALL INSTALLATION ANLI MAINTENANCE ANNOT BE PLACED IN ANY NATURAL BUFFERS OR SURFACE WATERS. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SH,L PROVIDE ON,S)MEETING THETA TRTATON AINING REQUIREMENTS SWPPP CLEARING OR GRUBBING.OR P.SAGE OF VEHICLES.IMMECIATELY AFTER THE • AND CONVEYANCES SUCH AS CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS.OR OF THE NRDES PERMIT TO CONDUCT INSPECTON AND MAINTENANCE OF,L EROSION CONDUITS AND DRONES. PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS IN ACCORDANCE NITH THE NTss ITTEENT)MUS INSTALL A VEHICLE TRACKING BNP TO MINwI3F THE TRACKOF THE PERMIT.ONE OF THESE INDPMUALS MUST BE AVAILABLE FOR AN ONSITE ,77717,AD asauL • OUT R OFSEDIMENT FROM THE CONSTRUCTON SITE. . .xm Sr* .. INSPECT.N WITHIN 72 HOURS UPON REMEST BY MP..THE CONTRACTOPROVIDE TRAINING AND DOCUMENTATION OF PERSONNEL TO INCLUDE, AIPERSONNEL ASSOCIATED WPM THE PROJECT THAT ARE REQUIRED TO BE INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE-PART IV,E a°^ M 42 TRAINING NAME OF AND ENTITY THAT PROVIDED t nTE15�MUST ENSURE THAT A TRMNE D PERSON WILL ROUTINELY INSPECT TRAINED , °'`,. a"'°^T M DATES OF TRA THE PERM CONSTRUCTION SITE AT LEAST ONCE EVERY SEE N 71 DAYS DURING ACTIVE • THAN oS T HN.H RAR NFA NT J a•N TM N NG THE ENTRE 4.3. CONTENT OF RNNWC TIONA INCLUDING OF OF COVERAGE SOF FOR THE CONSTRUCT.ARS WTI 3 OURS AFTER RAINFALL EVE WO* S FOLLOWING FINAL STABILMATION ANDTERMINATION OF COVERAGE FOR THE PERMIT,THE INCHES NNHOURS. �"'- ....... Rte, OWNER SHALL FURNISH LONG TERM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE PERMANENT 2 ,L INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE CONDUCTED DURING CONSTRUCTON MUS BE .. HIM tr.^Wmr STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM RECORDED WITHIN 24 HOURS IN WRITING AND T1ESE RECORDS MUST BE RETAINS➢WITH THE SWPPP IN ACCORDANCE WITH PART III.E. RECORDS RETENTION-PART ILLS 3. THE PERMRTEE(SH.RE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INSPECTION AND MMNTEANCE OF TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT BAPS,AS WELL AS ALL I EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPSNTL ANOTHER PERMITTEE HAS THE SWPPP(ORIGINAL OR COPIES)INCLUDINGALL CHANGES TO R,AND INSPECTIONS AND m MAINTENANCE RECORDS MUST BE KEPT AT THE SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION BY THE OBTAINED COVERAGE UNDERTHIS PERMIT NACCCRDANCE WITH PART 11.0.13 OR THE PERMITTEE(SI WHO HASmAVi OPERATIONAL CONTROL OF THAT PORTON OF THE SRE.THETHE AB. PROJECT HAS UNDERGONEFN,STADUZATDN.AND AN NOT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO SWPPPCAry BE KEPI INEiHEq THE FIELD OFFICE OR INAN ONSITE VEHICLE DURING NORMAL A, ALL INFILTRATION AREAS MUST BENSPECTEO TO ENSURE THAT NO SEDIMENT FROM WORKINGXQURS ONGOING CONSTRUTION ACTMTY IS REACHING THE INTILTRAOCN AREA ALL ALL OWNER(S)MUST KEEP THE PouovnNG SECURESa+FLE FOR THREE(]IVEARU LITER INFILTRATION AREAS MUST BE INSPECTED TO ENSURE THAT EQUIPMENT IS NOT BEING I -YIAa _ ,w -:F..... i ..... Be. Fon Pate. DRIVEN ACROSS THE INFILTRATION AREA .a .1-......t....4 ,rt r�A C� _ AFTER SUBMITTAL UB ITT L NOT AS NOT. VIED N PMT c.THIS DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY RECORDS AFTER SUBM TIAL OF THE NOT �^� ��a', -__..._ � POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT IV.F _..--_ __- _ _- .aa _ua.r am+ 1. THE FINAL SWPPP THE PERM-PENS)SHALL IMPLEMENT THE FOLLOWING POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT :TRY----------T a°`�a'° �M 2. ANY OTHER STORMWATEa RELATED PERMITS REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT MEASURES ON THE SITE: s ��° 1° °� ALL SOLID WASTE(COLLECTED SEDIMENT,ASPHALT AND CONCRETE FLOATING DEBRIS, ups 3. RECORDS OF ALL WSPECTON AND MAINTENANCE CONDUCTED DURING CONSTRUCTION 1- FLASTC CONSTRUCTION DEMOL ION.WOOMER wASTESI MUST BE DISPOSED w, �""'"' '°"'°^o re ”Fs (PART IVE.NSPECTONS AND MAINTENANCE) PAPER A, ALL PERMANENTOPERATONANDM,NTENANCEAGREEMENTSTHATHAVEBEEN DFPaDPER NDQUMPLYW HM AD PD LREG REQUIREMENTS. .�..A_a.._ SWPPP S(DLGASOLE.P E51 MUST BE PROPERLY STORED TO PREVENT SPILL,LEAKS OR OTHER DISCHARGE. BINDING REQUIREMENTS REGARDING PERPETUAL MAINTENANCEOFTETEMPDR TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT IMPLEMENTED,INCLUDING ALL RIGHT-0E4VA,CONTRACTS.COVENANTS AND RRESTRICTED ACCESS TO STORAGE MUST BE PROVIDED TO RPEVENT Narrative and LLRMWATEDCANAGEMENTSFORDESTEMS. POSALOFXAZARDDUB WASTE MUST BEWCOMPLIANCENITHMRCAANO Notes STO ] PERMITTEE(S)MUST PROVIDE EFFECTIVE il'i CONTMNMENT FOR ALL LIQUID AND SOLID W.TES GENERATED BY WASHOUT OPERATIONS.THE LIQUID AND SOLID WASHOUT WASTES MUST NOT OMTACT THE GROUND,AND THE CONTAINMENT MUST BE DESIGNE0 SO TIAT Tr DOES NOT RESULT IN ••=m4m1 RUNOFF FROM THE WASHOUT OPERATIONS AREA L.I0 AND SOLID W.TES MUST BE P.B. =` WASTES PRDPERFALILITEBFDRDIBPDBALDFLDERETEANDDTERWASHOUT P-5 m2RFn.1 Ryan Engineering MO DEVELOPMENT sERoCES t '12655 ETcdaor.Waterford55391 -..r_i (952)721700 " �E: ... au 'r �, Onion.REEL.o.pAD«« .� p p TO «.pnµD.p. EISINGER _ = o mL,D m Mall Or FLATS _._______ •�`�:: o map«..L.aL.T«.LLu«n:mLE: .h<xn«n.v«w,n __ •,� BITUMINOUS TRAIL ."... - any° MOS OT«u'«SE LNx EU En -. _._ Mot TO slut •'-"'° ' CONCRETE SIDEWALK �..er`w._R� •••�-,• • �-.- -...=•:,'. ` w.rosuLE Oros IAN s.,, m.'":ar°".w ,.7., - ®BOLgN °"= u.._OM. BOLTON "/✓i snaps .„,,„ ..L I --,,,e1 MEON i mam - EN � E'OE •MENK tMENK ` '47 MENK MTV ® MfiNK for LAKEWEST,LLC kr M. NO.n..:,.N . no .*. 1'''i n ' '.,_-. ._ ASA"° ahOIS i, b...,... yn e.ra. `A _._. ___ ......__ .......... iSW [ -t.:,!.., -,--..-..- :!-'-'-='- _ **n' WiI`rr' (p - R a� ......® .< �._-:.-_�_.._-� p Ems - ,°' m - ___ ,..o.....,...m.. , ',wive Details Dram i 'Aim' ,.'::"7"--^ ®BOLTON � no Loi .n vwsa ::®�NK vrtx ®BOLTON-..:. I f ' •MENK :: BMENK A �arzmuw ,., ~:: 6 ENK P-6 O 1W MN...PM Rya Engineering LAND DEVELOPMENT-SERVICES 1865 Waterford N t' �.:.:_ t^ '.N �`�'"`�• '''.'4'I'''' •'•' ExcNdor.AIN 55141 r ti :f .47"'"""`."." d 5.......—..tt CYCOaw i 'III"xxtt""I''I u a .N um , :many, ww1 wm P. r . wx„xwuxnwm w�ixva��w 1 II• D. IIII4Vr nN aoiuo wr•'�� I 1��.• ,vj �— " t... wu mnunw, • nw n.. +. a a a ^^.�,.^ ?min .x�w,.o ; EISINGER •m :._ �n�,.,w • FLATS �.• . ...,n,n,m • ..cm „xs„�.w.1.10 •m. n, wx,�, ON, B ES1G w.a �N •�.n„�, 1 ..,.MBmDFffiopxG .•u,nax,.t urcx ry , ,,e.x.... Orono MN ar °"""`- BOLTON ,... IS .�„ BOLTON r^ for Ew, t,r-t, , �"'” ®&MENK .I - , ®&MENK 'M� ... ®!,MENK i..... . wi.x°P.a:wu I ®6MENK YYYY n•+� civil ..•.....a..o. ,wmv •.,.....,.e. :,oma ........a.m.. aa`...•.L.,„. ..,.w...a..n.. LAKEWEST,LLC PDN,Dt ND ed.. 0 Ff.F.173...,.. :...:„.::. Ws lyami Mani tA 7::::::.. t,a� ,;� � - pi 1, ...........,........____._.... ..,,,.,,,,,,, ..,,... .....,,,.* u I. 1_1�..—.1 1 Parrin,Po* ..vm Fa Review Ccainction .aa•n1e' .w1'"r ua:wwr' max. ialsamini oa °::` i Details TON I®&M NN I ""' ®•RM NK ` �. I®&MENKI f ....©BO NKI N. P-7 ®WO 90.09.e019e00 Ryan Engineering LARD DEVEwP.RwT SERVICES mt-g .41-- `N .. ( •��. 1 '� sear TI655 Waterford PI „„„„„:,=---��' Eaceldor AN 55331 ' .,i\ r a (952)221-37(10 —IV — e n pRTREN= k c __4 PVC WAI � NTRENCH EISINGER FLATS '...r Orono MN BMENK �w4. "` -1 ..rrTON BMENK BOLTON y', .�,..,�..,.,. w.,�,P ... M. „ for � BOL�N BOLTON .SAO""" BOLTON _w J r....— LAKEWEST,LLC ke w. ........... A. ' i _ o — DIP WATERNIAIN y. ijni'T ..-(bOW..Dmilopronl x.Rw TRENCH dZ 7 ammvie eeae 1 4.. Coulrisdon d R.R.. ^,,— Detail _..•�&„�' -x ®BOLTON r Sui ofu -1- ®BOLTON ®BOLTON r.. BoLTeN Or �....n o.v. �I .,. BMENK ��(,f MBNK l 1 v..= "'" BMENK( } I ®BMENK w^ � * wu Nr -1 rwrra... w^ ".._ P-8 a POW eva!a.... / Preliminary Plant Schedule_ -�- ;•: R wAvzAZAeLw- �Y_ .. m...m i/.. 2.0.: As sow Engineering unoo�vewoMe.t staHcts u.00rer usa - ► 113655 wet °`t°`dR ' , f �� .....14C � . an .aa.i� .r..111 lirl#91111P1 VIP . � Eoeoesn 41 t MT,ea 71 fax Y �t ." \ i� ` .yi;,11•11111.111111jR...141,.,11117,,P9414,611a;...-iierilliklOr ,/- lr , , , _ " . /%� Il .ar-te at 'p "rm. . ut — �1Mi LV ' te . >.,A'A"."' --w . \\ r v/Ar� it -(j Planting Notes N 1 'ZIT", siwwn ',ItY- ''' a..Lt r=...ar n....na a,a pan.saw. \ ""' ' tiS ( °.,'..'m'.,::..":' w .n.-t pa .�: Ow deb EISINGER \ ��� f\ ��. a�M ..orae .�_.�...+....> � .. .. �. FLATS . I III , •w pis..`e i a*.a.~.rr.°m` mei....mamma `\ It \ a I�sti arra :m rhall h.*a.t.: gym.t. and a wit m.wm.,.w m.,•• Orono,IAN \N I 1,11 . „ a"r°r > atom..... a�...aw.a.>.......,atg.�..,.... for \ \• �,i. g I C''' rnw m.."...12,............=a.Y....s(..a a.tam.n..? NN - \ I{ >mmesm...,.,b,.......a...W m...pp.,.pan. LAKEwEBT, I Ya, we a.M.a..mart�a Irma.*w..r. \\ \ \\.- I I \ 0') a tIp%.10:... .q.se,..a.trru..t.....................”7,, \\ \N \,`'• i `\ i Iry p.b a.�.ra.•.21..1....=v.�.l w,M siva b mart W.r.MGMn Ma N I N '''' . ' ' \ .\ 1 'Yw... te a owe. ,.. •plant..rano a to pant 1.•znz*woman.oar m.7.,m�-pY�p \ N \ ��•'ttl Q� 'a PI**NMr.ataa•la z.�....r*.Iran i...0 w ant 1.0.4a.n mwaw r mvwz NAY ZA' \ \\ w11\ tau N.nM rw(wa.w..a)..Me rq P.eau.n.....w. ..sane a IS a.. \ an(.....a mud)...11,-w••ami ea*I.w.)rod WON.,n.-Mz M n.. a.w .... .i./..\ ,aPar z......st........,..all..0 a...aa.ae...no n..s..m.at ••+ra• \'a to ti. 6/..n.11.,••••••1 .pen m.mm,..eh.w e.a.a.n..mwas \\\\ ,.Pp.,tar...P,.....7...............7....,..........1...t t•0... _ a .m a.naiaai...mr..w"e wr man pi..le Lamm wesw o.e . Evergreen Detail Tree Detail ———- .r...... a.= pan ma**.am..®n• aan...�co,* ...t.r.,a..,.,an. tam me.La*m,a..ta w.w..rm..an.w a..ru.....a. la For oats i ,C� LT.V.Olr,— LEGEND Landscape Requirement Calculations der p„OffeWealwed GS-2T•" JO_ --_.,r._. SWFRALL PRoJFCT LANDSCAPE RFDUIRFMENTS rmarbary am. Rwawrw @•1teMve.... _ Adm "••.5.: ^a,' "" ,:� �R�, ._mer— .....m..... ....n n• n-r aan.m -atm '•:..' aE.Trs>�i� V �t-^~. r ;�� nvsaan awutmr,ac fMain® s a rovtastr(Rmz s.cameo.) ,�•.. _.a.___ MR S�trY�s ms ,m aat c....., . �� • :. -j=rte= 0 .,t�amatat.,a :.a_ m Preliminary ""a: .gym LP Of tilE...a -a)EMI. Landscape + Plan :1:::::-'1-- Shrub Detail So „a,.,..,,,,, n0 IF OF.STE MSCa(.La 4• ®a«,a_a.m t , oColt� w30 tr a .ac li---7-_w® . ';V �y= 4.4 L-1_ . , i rte, ' "-I EAST STUDIO 11 // ONE BEDROOM 65 ONE BEDROOM+.DEN 3 TWO BEDROOM 36 7 115 / _ .:. -,a . # WEST �. STUDIO 9 / ALCOVE BEDROOM 13 ® I I ONE BEDROOM 70 ONE BEDROOM+DEN 6 TWO BEDROOM 129 31 / = qr_ / a TOTAL UNITS:244 ��- I / - — — / PARKING COUNT:397 STALLS E:EAST GARAGE 109 STALLS ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN WEST GARAGE:127 STALLS SITE:161 STALLS CI Collage FLATS ORONO,MN Collage a r c h i t,e c t s MARCH.20.2019 316'"3" 1 1 STUDIO 'F .. 1F .. 7R .. 7r. ---• 1 ` UNIT TYPE 10181 SF e ALCOVE BEDROOM EAST ONE BEDROOM - UNITA STUDIO-:: 8 587 ONE BEDROOM+DEN o UNIT A2 STUDIO 3 615 -TWO BEDROOM . 4 UNIT D STUDIO 1 681 ♦ COMMONS r ..:1-;..3UNIT F ONE BEDROOM 6 733 1� , UNITG ONE BEDROOM 50 677 JL. AL • .MM UNIT G2 ONE BEDROOM 2 681 UNIT G4 ONE BEDROOM 4 900 ,11: +DEN 272 5" 7 UNIT J ONE.BEDROOM 2 677.:. h - UNIT K ONE BEDROOM 3 839:' n 0 +DEN 31 • ---- • UNITM TWO BEDROOM 3 954 -1-" - UNITN."TWO BEDROOM 18 1050 • 7 .11'1'1� ` UNIT O TWO BEDROOM 8 1150 i - i UNIT 02 TWO BEDROOM 3 1150 UNIT 03 TWO BEDROOM 1 1150 E UNITP TWO BEDROOM 3 1408 1mmimmiiii.:.: - EAST 115 WEST UNITA STUDIO 4 587 I • JL •• •• JY' -="`* UNIT B ALCOVE 3 7 BEDROOM UNIT C STUDIO 2 5 74-0 UNIT STUDIO 4 [681 i i UNITE ALCOVE 10 570 . BEDROOM UNIT F ONE BEDROOM 9 888 UNITG ONE BEDROOM 39 677 427 8 - 7 UNIT G2 ONE BEDROOM 2 681 00 DEN .---- - - �• - UNIT G4 ONE BEDROOM 2 UNIT H ONE BEDROOM"6 740 • ar. ar• ar ter _. a� ar• �' m -0 g N UNITI ONE BEDROOM 11 740 C z OF UNIT K ONE BEDROOM 3 839 n ■ ". +DEN r u1 V "` '1 UNIT • L ONE BEDROOM 3 910 -,=1 .DEN ET.'.' UNITM TWO BEDROOM 3 854• : '' `' UNIT N TWO BEDROOM 12 1131 .__. ,L_... _JL •• JL °�•• 7L 7L •• -7L •• 7F`- ---• - UNIT TWO BEDROOM 12 1150 496'-7" UNITP TWO BEDROOM 3 1408 -- i UNIT TWO BEDROOM 1 677 WEST:129 1ST FLOOR PLAN ') 1•=50"0 EISINGER FLATS iv � ORONO,MN J Collage I architects MARCH.20.2019 1 316'-3"85'-0" i ly I-,=..;;....I STUDIO ,... 7r „ 7r • \r .. fir. ALCOVE BEDROOM MINI ONE BEDROOM ' F. ONE BEDROOM+DEN o �TWOBEDROOM i-,..1 i »y COMMONS ItTes. ,' 7 • JL , Ill 1 7 112 PII. ` Y JL .. 272-5" n n m .-rte,, <_ t,. 156'-5° Jr 7a-o" , k. / 427'-8" n • •I ,. lg.. ar • .1' ' lia • iN -., EE r �c �� c ow • • - 496.-T' \ 2ND FLOOR PLAN 1.=56'-0' EISINGER FLATS � ORONO,MN J Collage I architects MARCH.20.2019 84'_0" 317._3" l._ 'STUDIO ♦ • . , .. .. ♦- ®ALCOVE BEDROOM /4.1: - - ONE BEDROOM S ONE BEDROOM+DEN o ,, O NION TWO BEDROOM 'IS 273'_2" - M 73'-11" 1 129'-6" 73'-11" �1_ _ X11, ♦ 42T-8" m II M■ L I . 'L•-aL .. AL •. Aa AL .. AL ..AE .. ALS - -- • - 496' 7" 3RD FLOOR PLAN 1•=50'-0• EISINGER FLATS nil ORONO,MN .a Collage I architects MARCH.20.2019 MATERIAL INDEX 11 10 m O ® B B OMB 13 ® © B 0 17 ® m 1 ROCK FACE BLOCK(COLOR:TBD) 2 MODULAR FACE BRICK(COLOR:TBD) 3 CAST STONE SILL(COLOR TBD) C'1000J ■ ■!J!!1 ADE■ ■ �00�# ■ ■I I ■ 1■ ■� ■ m© 4 FSMOOTH)MENT PANEL(PREFINISHED COLOR TERRACOTTA 5 FIBER CEMENT LAPP SIDING SIDING 6"(PREFINISHED COLOR LIGHT GREY-SMOOTH) ul I. ■ • 11• ■1,I ■ ■ ■I pi • I I. • 1■ •I 6 FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING 6",3.(PREFINISHED COLOR CHARCOAL GREY-SMOOTH) Ea 7 FIBER CEMENT WINDOW TRIM(PREFINISHED COLOR'.WHITE) 1• ■1 ■ • ■1 I I1■ ■ • I•'■1 1• ■I I ■ 1■'■I 8 PREFINISHED ALUMINUM BALCONY W/MTL GUARDRAIL (PICKET,BLACK)TYP. T-_ - �r fl 9 ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM(COLOR:BLACK) _.. _. � u -n-a-n-� 10 VINYL WINDOWS(COLOR BLACK) 11 ALUMINUM FRAMED BALCONY SCREEN WITH INFILL PANEL BUILDING W-NORTH ELEVATION BUILDING W-SOUTH ELEVATION 2 12 ASPHALT ROOF SHINGLES(COLOR:CHARCOAL) 364'=1'-0' © 11 © © 0 100 © 00 11 0 UDUUDB Om © © % /�q,�, ■I 1 !1! 2 :1: le 'i:1a ■ ■011110111111111 ■ ■1■ Mt ■'■l■RI 1 ■■■ li ■MIM111. ,■ I I! !I! ! !I! ! !I!' '•' • 1 1! ! ! ■1 1 ■ ■ !I! !!!! ■I! ■I • 1 1! ! ! !I 1 • ■ !I! ! I5 m I! !I I !I! ! !I! ! !I! ■ ■ !I I ! ! I I! • ■ !I! !!!! !I! ■ ■ ■I I ! ! ;I I! ■ ■ !I! ! I! BUILDING W-WEST ELEVATION 3/64'=1'-0' a o ® a ODD mD m D o © O® a © aMaMOO © Bj 0 © 111B 1�J 'EELM C■!!■ �u� all! ■''J 0I I!i!I! ■ ,1]� !1! I! !I441 SWIM ' !E! ■, ■I ■I■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ !!!! !I! • • 1II! !! !I I • • !I! !I! !! 1 I! I! !I !III I G LI! : -1 I I I- !I! !I! • • °I I !! I'I! ■ • !I! !I! I !1 I I! !I I I I 0 gpotezisiEti BUILDING W-EAST ELEVATION _= 1111 j���! EISINGER FLATS ORONO,MN -- Collage I architects MARCH.20.2019 MATERIAL INDEX 1 ROCK FACE BLOCK(COLOR TBD) 2 MODULAR FACE BRICK(COLOR TBD) 3 CAST STONE SILL(COLOR:TBD) 4 FIBER CEMENT PANEL(PREFINISHED COLOR TERRACOTTA- SMOOTH) 5 FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING 6"(PREFINISHED COLOR.LIGHT GREY-SMOOTH) 6 FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING 6",3"(PREFINISHED COLOR. CHARCOAL GREY-SMOOTH) 7 FIBER CEMENT WINDOW TRIM(PREFINISHED COLOR.WHITE) 8 PREFINISHED ALUMINUM BALCONY W/MTL GUARDRAIL (PICKET,BLACK)TYP. 9 ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM(COLOR BLACK) 10 VINYL WINDOWS(COLOR BLACK) 11 ALUMINUM FRAMED BALCONY SCREEN WITH INFILL PANEL B I ® I y B IO B © 01111111111111 12 ASPHALT ROOF SHINGLES(COLOR CHARCOAL) ... m ©© ® 0 0 2 6 ® C I!'111I -i, 111:;■11 ."1!.I I!.:.: . 1111. I� ■q g 111 ,L... ILI ■ ■ , 1_ lei 1!•I • I Is Ii1 1 • 1! ■ � ■ ■ 1■ _■ !■ •■ •• ! ■ ! ■ ■ ■ ■ •■ •■ •■ ■■ . ■ ■ ■ ■ 1_ •1 �_ -� I� _I _ I! 1_ _I. I 1 1_ 1_ _I _I 1 1 ., 11_ 1_ I! !1 ' I 1! •I I© ■■I ■ i !I! Mi!!!! !I 11! !1 I I■ I T- - u-1'_ , ,.,j„ , , ,u11 T,- FNE T,�t,_ T'=, p BUILDING W-SOUTHWEST ELEVATION BUILDING W-WEST ELEVATION 2 BUILDING W-SOUTH ELEVATION 3/6r=1'-0' 3/64' li © © U m CIO B ® BB 113 00 13111 CI g a am annum Licui n n0007X00. DDD ■�■I�I I a !1@ ■II! 1 1■ ■o • ■I I I_ I__I I__1 I I I_ .. , - - I! i1 ril n ■■ ■■ n n �■.:, t I ■■ PI■ ■■■■■11';,11■•■ ;nl! !II! m1 I ! I I! !I I IS it 1 U !I I II!!1 I'll!!I !I! n I11 !1 ra II © (I !! !I NNE NNE !! !! AIN ISI I I! ! !II !I BUILDING W-EAST ELEVATION 2 BUILDING W-NORTH ELEVATION 2 ""_'-0 3�4 1 EISINGER FLATS �I ORONO,MN Imw-.7.• Collage I architects MARCH.20.2019 2 3 6 1 8 11 10 4 6 5 8 5 12 10 7 0 m0'0® 0 9 ©© MATERIAL INDEX ••�. ,,,� 1 ROCK FACE BLOCK(COLOR:TBD) �ry cl j I. 111 -201 ;pI 7 I ���� 1 2 MODULAR FACE BRICK(COLOR:TBD) �� (��i197�1 V ■ �� S CEMENT LL(COLOR:FINI ,yqq p7d 4 FIBER CEMENT PANEL(PREFINISHED COLOR TERRACOTTA- � r'� SMOOTH) !9 ■I II! ■ • I I! •l II1 i''�',' •I I! Y 1.'1•' I! •1 !I 1 1 5 FIBER-SM FIBER CEMENT TH)AP SIDING 6"(PREFINISHED COLOR:LIGHT 6 FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING 6",3"(PREFINISHED COLOR: ■1 1■ ■1 • • ■11 11•121011m ■1 1 •11 1• •1 11■ 1 CHARCOAL GREY-SMOOTH) �� I.I 1 7 FIBER CEMENT WINDOW TRIM(PREFINISHED COLOR WHITE) - i -_-- ---- -----_______ -----_-=- - n n-u -- u--u - u----_r_u u_ r_n n n �_ ui_�_u�L 6 PREFINISHED CKALTUYMPI. r-_ ---__ -= "- -_ _ _ - -R u9 ALUMINUM STOREFRONT UM SYSTEM(COLOR(CWO/LMOTRL BLACK) BUILDING ) BUILDING E-NORTH ELEVATION R AIL BUILDING E-SOUTH ELEVATION 10 VINYL WINDOWS BAR BLACK) 3164'= 11 ALUMINUM FRAMED BALCONY SCREEN WITH INFILL PANEL 12 ASPHALT ROOF SHINGLES(COLOR CHARCOAL) 19 © 0 0 00 © 00 MOB 00 ma 00 CIOBI00 OMB 0 10 0 010 0 m 00 u !II!MI ■ ■'OCID OC7 8�:.' 00 AGO■ •MI Nn ! !' J!J!! n n C0T1. :�1 • II! ■1. !!!! !I! ■ ■ 1. 1• !!! I I! !! of I ■ ■ !I !!!!! !I! n n 1 1! !! I1111II! !! I I! !I !I! !1! ■ ■ •11 !!! •1 1 I[I 1 II! ■ ■ !I! !!!! !1! n n !I 1 !! 11! n, n •1 1 !! 1! !1 BUILDING E-WEST ELEVATION 3/64'=1'-0' 0 00 0 190 0 190 0113 0 0 0 19 0 19 ole 0 019 BOB 13 113 011 0 00 0011 atm ■ ■ mit I quEi■ ■Et: I'I■I ■ ■ O[I0 DEE■ ■ W ! -I_ ! 41! 1 II!! 1141 I! •l ■ ■ !I! !I! ' u1 I ! U I!1! !!!! !1! • ■III! ! ! !!1 1 ■ • !II! ! !I! ! !I! !II 1 Cl I 1• !I • • !I! !1! ' II! ■ ■ ■1! !!!! !1! ■ ■I !1 1 ! ! II I! ■ ■ !1! ! !I! ! !1! I I! !I I, BUILDING E-EAST ELEVATION 3/64'=1'-0' EISINGER FLATS �I ORONO,MN .- Collage I architects MARCH.20.2019 tar, i, a . PIPY til ! - 7 '1"I +ate741 ■ 1 , —_1 I , I I ��,'"' a r - _w .,,..,�,. s- NE VIEW-COLOR OPTION 1 EISINGER FLATS 1117 ORONO,MN Collage I architects C h I t e C t 5 MARCH.20.2019 J i tkt■e _ _,._ ,t -i; II14 9C t 1 41C EG�1I _... N ' 1I I 16:i SW VIEW COLOR OPTION 1 i' EISINGER FLATS � ORONO,MN J Collage I architects MARCH.20.2019 Preliminary Plat Submittal — Narrative EISINGER FLATS 3245 Wayzata Blvd W, Orono, MN 55356 PID: 3211823140002, 3211823140001 ` f L e-r IM I I ■ggg1 , l' 1 1'I !'1 ') l �� M I II, MM�Ili` i'llli u.,:. r. . I! !1 a -^-- i .. .� . ..l. 1 !1! 1! !1 �1 1 1 317 1 'I' 1�1 �� .' ��I1 MA 1 ill , .. „t . .!I! 1 ®ll 1! El I ILI v. NE VIEW-COLOR OPTION 1 March 20, 2019 411 Overview Lakewest, LLC requests Preliminary Plat approvals ini order to develop the property at. the south side of Wayzata Blvd W, just north of the Highway 12 bypass in Orono, MN. This proposed preliminary plan is part of the overall parcel which received Preliminary Plat Approval by Resolution 6655 on July 25, 2016 and also Concept Approval for the multi-family on October 8, 2018. i Curt Fretham, Manager Lakewest, LLC Office: 952-930-3000 Lakewest,LLC 145 5 Highway 7,Suite z65,Minnetonka,MN 553451 Phone 952-930-3000 Concept Review— Narrative— EISINGER FLATS A. Contact Information Owner of Record Lakewest, LLC 14525 Highway 7, Suite 265 Minnetonka, MN 55345 Applicant Curt Fretham, Manager Lakewest, LLC, 14525 Highway 7, Suite 265 Minnetonka, MN 55345, Phone 952-930-3000 B. Site Data Address 3245 Wayzata Blvd W Orono, MN 55356 Zoning RPUD Parcel Size 30.5+/-acres Wayzata Blvd ROW = 1.6+/-acres Block 1 &2(Villas) =4.7+/-acres Block 3(Multi-Fam) =9.8+/-acres Outlot A(Villa RW) =0.8+/-acres Outlot B =0.34+/-acres Outlot C =2.97 +/-acres Outlot D = 10.41 +/-acres See Preliminary Plat for Area Calculations 3211823140002, 3211823140001 Description See Preliminary Plat, Eisinger Flats Hennepin County, Minnesota. Abstract Property. C. Description of the Project - Overall The north phase of Eisinger Meadows received preliminary Plat approval on July 25, 2016 by Resolution 6655. This proposal is for preliminary plat approval for the south phase which we have named Eisinger Flats. Concept approval for Eisinger Flats was received on the City Council meeting on October 8, 2018. Eisinger Meadows Preliminary Plat,subdivided the northerly portion of the 30.5 acre parcel into 27 Villa Homes on approximately 5.5 acres of the parcel with the balance of the property shown as outlots. The preliminary plan for the balance of the upland property is for an Apartment/Sr. Living building, outdoor recreational areas,trails, and parking. Page 2 of 4 Concept Review— Narrative— EISINGER FLATS Description of Eisinger Flats — Apartment/ Sr. Living Building We are proposing to develop the south phase of the overall project into"Eisinger Flats"which will be an Apartment/Sr. Living Building. The buildings,as proposed,would be situated on the site to blend into the existing topography of the property while being respectful of the wetland buffers as set forth in the approvals of Eisinger Meadows. The buildings would be a combination of brick and cement board panels and siding with a shallow roofline,generally as depicted in the concept elevation shown on the architectural plans. We are proposing private outdoor recreational areas which would exceed 10%of the platted upland property as well as a perimeter trail with passive seating areas to enjoy the natural amenities of the site, including the wetlands on both the west and east. The placement of the buildings will provide a buffer not only for the recreational areas, but also to the 27 villa units of Eisinger Meadows. Care will be taken with final placement and preservation of existing natural screening to provide the City of Orono with an aesthetically pleasing entrance to the City. Architecturally,we are proposing a lower roofline to minimize the building massing. With this roof type proposed, along with the setback and buffering,the proposed three story structures will be able to accommodate the City's height requirements. As proposed,we are showing two buildings. The West Building would consist of 129 units while the East Building would consist of 115 units for a total of 244 units. As shown on the site plan,there are considerable wetlands and wetland buffers on the property. These wetlands consist of approximately 13.4 acres, leaving a balance of"upland"acres for the Eisinger Flats building of approximately 9.8 acres for a net density of 24.89 units/acre. Per the conclusions in the above mentioned resolution for the Eisinger Meadows project,the property was originally guided for High Density Residential. Per the most recent change to the City's Comprehensive Guide Plan,this parcel has been re-guided to High Density Residential. On October 8,2018,the project received concept approval for this use. D. Construction Debris Landfill / MPCA Resolutions A portion of the site is part of a historic landfill of generally demolition materials as discussed during the original north phase approval. We are working closely with our consultant,Wenck Associates, Inc. and the MPCA to coordinate efforts on required cleanup for the project. They are currently finalizing the Response Action Plan(RAP)which will detail the procedures to remove any demolition or landfill debris found during site preparation. We expect this to be completed and approved through the MPCA and plan to submit to the various state agencies for cleanup funding by May 1,2019. Page 3 of 4 Concept Review— Narrative — EISINGER FLATS E. Site Utilities As originally planned for in the approved Eisinger Meadows,we will be requesting the City proceed with construction of sanitary sewer and watermain from near Old Crystal Bay Road, westerly to serve both Eisinger Meadows and Eisinger Flats. The proposed Site and Utility Plan show connecting to these services. F. Stormwater Management The Eisinger Meadows Villas project has planned to construct stormwater management ponds on the west side of the project as shown on the Grading Plan. The Eisinger Flats project will propose to install an underground stormwater management system within the parking lot between the two buildings to treat the stormwater per City and MCWD regulations. This underground system will then direct water through the proposed Eisinger Meadows pond prior to entrance into the wetland. Page 4 of 4 Jacobson Environmental, PLLC Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S., W.D.C., P.W.S., A.F.S. 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612) 802-6619 Cell Email: iacobsonenvPmsn.com www.jacobsonenvironment:al.com April 30, 2016 Kayla Mack Development Assistant Lakewest Development 14525 Highway 7, Suite 265 Minnetonka, MN 55345 Dear Kayla: The property located at 3245 Wayzata Boulevard West in Hennepin County, Minnesota in T118N, R23W, Section 32 is shown in the attached Figure 7 detailed conservation plan map, and in the Figure 8 Bluff buffer plan map which outlines a buffer area from the 986 contour to the tree fringe with a black line around the 986 contour. When we did the field walk on April 1, 2016 we reviewed the site for invasive and noxious weed species. We found the invasive Common Buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica) on the site in the wooded area on the south and east in Area B in a moderate amount consisting mostly of shrubs f-om 3 to 5 feet in height. This was in a woodland fringe of the property and we do recommend buckthorn control since other species are common in the area. Also, we found the invasive Reed Canarygrass (Phalaris arundinacea) on the site in both wetlands. We do not recommend control of the Reed Canarygrass since it is very common in wetlands across the metro area, as this would require a special permit as well. There were no other species on the site which are known to be invasive or noxious weed species on the bluff area. We do not recommend vegetative alteration of the fringe box elder tree area (other than buckthorn control in Area B) on the west, south, and east adjacent to the wetlands because the topography is relatively steep and vegetation is established. We only recommend removing any demolition debris and dead trees from this area. The files of the report are as follows: 1. Site Conservation Plan 2. Conservation Plan Checklist 3. Site Location Map-Grading Plan-Soils Map 4. Aerial with Landscaping-Wetland Delineation Map 5. Overall Area Plan-Detail Conservation Plan-Bluff Buffer Plan-Mesic Prairie Seed Mix 6. Buckthorn Control 7. MDA Noxoius Weed List 8. Site Photos Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Banking-Functional Analysis Phase I Environmental Assessrnents-EAW's-Hydric Soil Delineation-Referrals Pond & Lake Weed Removal-Tree Surveys-Management Plans Jacobson Environmental, PLLC Environmental Consultants Wayne Jacobson, P.S.S., W.D.C., P.W.,S., A.F.S. 5821 Humboldt Avenue North, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (612) 802-6619 Cell Email: jacobsonenv@ msn.com www.jacobsonenvironmentaLcom We did find ground ivy and stinging nettle in small amounts in Area A and B, which are all box elder trees except for 1 cottonwood and about 8 american elm on the southeast. We do not think these plants in Areas A and B warrant control, except for buckthorn. The Area C and the Bluff Buffer Area (a 20 to 40 foot wide area) should have the top 6 inches of turf removed, and then have the mesic prairie southwest seed mix planted. Since the fringe trees are virtually all box elder, we did not think a tree survey was necessary in this case. Thank you for the opportunity to serve you. Please contact me at 612-802-6619 if I can answer any questions on this site. Sincerely, "0-e_ Wayne E. Jacobson, P.S.S., W.D.C., P.W.S., A.F.S. Senior Scientist cc: Mike Gaffron, City of Orono Robert Bean, Bolton & Menk Wetland Delineation-Mitigation-Permitting-Monitoring-Banking-Functional Analysis Phase I Environmental Assessrnents-EAW's-Hydric: Soil Delineation--Referrals Pond & Lake Weed Removal-Tree Surveys-Management Plans vµ 44\ BCD t-TC>N & r\A a- N k , I r .1(..-.._'- /.,-.4:7,-- 1,,,0,, Consulting Engineers & Surveyors m1'`, 'A% 2638 Shadow Lane. Suite 200•Chaska. MN 55318-1172 F 'i Phone(952)448-8838• c=ax (952)448-8805 \'@as e s`a`,.- www.bolton-menk.com April 11. 2016 City of Orono Attn: Mike Gaffron 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono. MN 55356 RE: Preliminary Plat Application 16-3822 Eisinger Meadows Engineering Review#1 Dear Mike: As requested, we have completed an engineering review of the documents submitted for the above referenced project. We offer the following observations, comments, and recommendations for Your consideration: 1.0 GENERAL: I.I Stormwater management for the proposed site meets City requirements_ Proposed peak runoff rates will he restricted to less than existing peak runoff rates. However. if the proposed design is significantly revised during the Final Plat approval process,a Final Stormwater Management Plan should he submitted with the Final Construction Plans. Also, additional detail will be required with the Final Plans to ensure system is constructed as designed. 1.2 Storm sower calculations should be submitted for review to verify adequate sizing. 1.3 The Conservation Design Master Plan(CDMP) should he revised to include more complete recommendations and direction to address the following topics: a. Invasive Species—The CDMP should be revised to include a complete Vegetation Management Plan. The plan should include a list of all invasive plant species encountered(i.e. buckthorn, garlic mustard, reed canary grass,creeping charlie. Canada thistle.etc.i and recommended procedures and schedule for eradication of listed species. h. Protection of Sinnificant Tree Stands—The CDMP should be revised to include discussions on the location, quality. and value of existing significant tree stands,recommendations for areas to he preserved, and justification and mitigation of impacts of any such stands to he impacted by development activities. The Vegetation Management Plan should depict propr_ised Tree Preservation areas and trees designated for removal to allow for review of potential conservation easements. c. Protection of Wetlands—The Vegetation Management Plan should include procedures. schedule. and seed mixes for protecting and establishing buffers around wetlands. 1.4 Due to the size of proposed disturbance, a Topsoil Management Plan should be included with the Final Plans to ensure adequate topsoil placement. The plan should provide direction for topsoil stripping. stockpile location(s), soil de-compaction prior to re-spread,certification of topsoil for ie- spread meeting specifications, and placement of topsoil. This information could he included on the Final Grading Plan. 1.5 The applicant will be required to obtain Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) approval and permitting for their Erosion Control., Wetland Protection, and Waterhody Crossings and Structures Rules. A copy of any approvals or permits required should he submitted prior to Final --' �,y� Preliminary Plat Application 16-3822 /m( `\ Eisinger Meadows \\ 2 // Page. Plat approval. Since proposed impervious surface will account for less than 20% of the project area, stormwater management should not be required by MCWD. 1.6 The applicant will he required to obtain Hennepin County approval and permitting for accesses and work in right-of-way on Wayzata Boulevard (CSAH 112). Development parameters listed n the City's Comprehensive Plan call for a single connection, but two connections are proposed. ,1 copy of any approvals or permits required should he submitted prior to Final Plat approval. 1.7 The applicant will be required to obtain a Sanitary Sewer Extension permit from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and a Water Main Extension permit front the Minnesota Department of Health. Applications should be coordinated with the City, and a copy of any approvals or permits required should be submitted prior to any land disturbing activity. 1.8 The applicant will he required to obtain a General Construction Permit (NPDF,S) to discharge stormwater associated with construction activity since more than I acre will be disturbed. A copy of the permit should be submitted prior to any land disturbing activity. 1.9 The applicant will be required to submit a Maintenance Agreement for all stormwater management structures and facilities. The agreement should define maintenance responsibilities fallowing completion of project. specify types and frequencies of inspection and maintenance activities. and designate who will conduct inspection and maintenance activities. 1.10 Record drawings must be submitted upon completion of tree protect. If the proposed permanent pond is to be used as a temporary sediment basin during construction. as-built survey shots on the pond must he obtained after construction sediment is removed and side slopes re-dressed. Also, due to the size of the proposed disturbed area, a survey should he provided for the site after rough grading is complete to ensure correct hold-downs prior to topsoil placement and pavement construction, and a survey should he provided for the topsoil stockpile to ensure adequate quantity for re-spread. 2.0 PRELIMINARY PLAT: 2.I A Flowage and Conservation easement will he required over the wetlands. 2.2 Drainage and Utility F.asements should he provided to auacquately cover all ditching, storm sewer, and ponds to the high water level. 2.3 Drainage and Utility Easements should be revised to accommodate changes to storm sewer necessary to provide subsurface draintile service connectins. 2.4 Oudot B will require a road and utilities easement over its entire area. The easement should he generated using the standard city forst and recorded as part of the Final. Plat process. 3.0 SITE PLAN: 3.1 Stop signs and stop bars should he provided at intersections with Wayzata Boulevard (CSAR 1 12). 3.2 The proposed layout should he reviewed by the Fire Chief to ensure adequate space for turning around of fire department vehicles. A temporary cul-de-sac may be necessary. 4.0 GRADING PLAN: 4.1 The normal water level (nwl) and 100 year high water level (hwl) should he indicated on the plan for the pond/filtration basin. 4.2 Arrows and slopes should be provided on the Final Plans to ensure adequate grade is provided, ' minimum 2% and maximum 3:1 slope is recommended for green areas. 4.3 Emergency overflow routes should be clearly labeled to,ensure adequate surface overflows are provided. 4.4 An emergency overtlow should he provided for the pond/filtration basin at the 100 year high water level. The overflow should he armored with turf reinforcement mat or riprap. o > Preliminary Plat Application I6-3822 o; tEisinger Meadows \\��� x Page 3 \. S.O EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN: 5.1 General SWPPP Notes should he revised to indicate a minimum 6-topsoil used for re-spread. 5.2 Notes should he revised to indicate perimeter erosion control measures and protection fencing vvitt he installed by Contractor and inspected by City prior to any denwlitior, or land disturbance. Contractor must provide 24 hour notice prior to inspection. 5.3 If the proposed permanent stormwater management basin will be used as a temporar\ sediment basin during construction, additional sequencing notes and linework should be included as necessary to provide clear direction for installation schedule of perimeter sediment control devices, temporary sediment basin, rough grading and temporary ditching. temporary seeding. utility and street construction, site stabilization (including topsoil r -spread, erosion control blanket, riprap. and permanent vegetation), removal of perimeter measures,construction sediment removal, outlet control structure installation, and permanent stabilization of the ponds. 5.4 Double siltience must he provided adjacent to wetlands where grading is proposed within 50' of the wetland. 6.0 SANITARY SEWER :AND WATER MAIN PLAN 6.1 Sanitary sewer and watcrmain review comments will he provided separately' as plan development progresses. 7.0 STORM SEWER PLAN 7.1 Subsurface draint:le service connections should be provided for all lots not directly abutting a pond or wetland. Storm sewer layout and Drainage and Utility Easements may Meed to be ad,usteel accordingly. 7.2 CBMH-1 should he constructed with a 4' sump to provide pretreatment prior to the pond/filtration basin. 7.3 Cleanouts for the filtration basin underdrain should he provided. Cleanouts should he located above the high water level to limit potential for bypassing filtration system. 8.0 LANDSCAPE PLAN 8.1 Since common bu:kthorn is identified in the Conservation Design Master Plan (CDMP) for removal, the Final Landscape Plan should indicate areas of buckthorn removal and incorporate re nova' guidelines outlined in the CDMP. 8.2 Various proposed tree locations will need to be adjusted to remove conflicI with utilities. Please let me know if you have any questions or need additional information. Sincerely, BOLTON &``MENK, INC. n 64 Robert E. Bean, Jr., P.E. Water Resources Engineer April 3, 2016 Kayla Mack Development Assistant Lakewest Development 14525 Highway 7, Suite 265 Minnetonka, MN 55345 RE: Site Conservation Plan Dear Kayla, The property located at 3245 Wayzata Boulevard West in Hennepin County, Minnesota in T118N, R23W, Section 32 is shown in the attached Figure 7,Site Detail Conservation Plan. Figure 6 shows a preliminary area conservation plan which shows a green corridor across the south side of the area. We performed an ecological investigation of the site on April 1, 2016 where we responded to requested conservation design checklist items by the City of Orono. 1. Provide written response to the Goals and Policies for Environmental Protection and Natural Resource Management. The intent is to establish the property's ecological conned:ions both within Orono and as part of the regional ecological system. The summary of items addressed is in the attached Conservation Design Checklist. 2. A.The property has two basic views of the property as follows: a. From the northern hill west and south toward the forested fringe and the large cattail marsh beyond before Highway 12. b. From the planned developed area looking east toward another large cattail marsh and the apple orchard beyond. B. Corridor enclosure a. Along the west and south of the property there is an edged enclosure which shields the property with a solid wall of box elder forest before the cattail marsh. b. Along the east of the property there is an edged enclosure which shields the property with a solid wall of box elder and american elm forest before the cattail marsh. C. Landmarks—There are no established landmarks on the property. 3. Natural Resource Inventory a. Review and Document the MLCCS data pertinent to the site. i. On the Level 1 and Level 3 MLCCS Inventory the site was classified as planted or cultivated vegetation. ii. There are no Natural Areas documented on the site by the MLCCS Inventory. b. Site Analysis i. Conceptual greenways and open space corridors 1. West,South and Southeast Tree Stand Area on west and south of PIC) #3211823140002 Area A Species Composition Trees Box Elder 90% F'eachleaf Willow 2% Black Willow 1% Shrubs Tartarian Honeysuckle 40% Herbs Ground Ivy 50% Motherwort 10% Smooth Brome 10% Stinging Nettle 10% Red Raspberry 5% Common Burdock 5% Hairy Crabgrass 3% Reed Canarygrass 2% Area B Species Composition Trees Box Elder 85% American Elm 5% Black Willow 1% Cottonwood 1% Shrubs Tartarian Honeysuckle 10% Common Buckthorn 60% Herbs Ground Ivy 50% Motherwort 10% Smooth Brome 10% Stinging Nettle 10% Red Raspberry 5% Common Burdock 5% Hairy Crabgrass 3% Reed Canarygrass 2% Area C Species Composition Shrubs Common Buckthorn 2% Northern Prickly Ash 5% Herbs Kentucky Bluegrass 10% Smooth Brome 60% Stinging Nettle 5% Common Burdock 1% Hairy Crabgrass 5% Reed Canarygrass 15% Upland Grassed Area Species Composition to North of Conservation Green Corridor Smooth Brome 50% Stinging Nettle 5% Kentucky Bluegrass 20% Little Bluestem 4% Hairy Crabgrass 2% Reed Canarygrass 3% Giant Foxtail 5% Common Ragweed 3% Velvetleaf 1% Switchgrass 5% ii. Existence of rare plant communities which there are none iii. Potential Need for Proactive Management and Protection 1. Remove Common Buckthorn shrubs in Area B and Northern Prickly Ash stands in Area C 2. Remove herbaceous vegetation by turf removal in Area C and plant with native Mesic Prairie Southwest seed mix attached 4. Conservation Design Master Plan a. Stormwater Master Plan—suspended until future site plans submitted. b. Invasive Species Removal and Management Plan i. Common Buckthorn—Rhamnus cathartica removal from Area B—See Appendix B. ii. Reed Canarygrass—Phalaris arundinacea allowed to remain in areas because they are a minor part of the areas outside of the protected wetlands. c. Tree mitigation and diseased tree plan—diseased or damaged trees will be cut down and removed from the site, trees native to the big woods area will be replanted as replacements such as: Basswood—Tilia americana Red Maple—Acer rubrum Hackberry—Celtis occidentalis Black Cherry--Prunus serotina d. Tree protection plan—The Area A and Area B trees will be protected on the site. If trees are lost from these areas, trees from item c above will be planted as replacements. e. Woodland protection and mitigation plan—The Common Buckthorn will be removed and maintained per Appendix B methods. f. Negative Impacts to ecological communities—no negative impacts are planned. g. Maintenance of Ecological Connections—Ecological connections would be present along the west, south, and southeast areas of the site through Areas A, B, and C and wetlands. h. Views—Positive views will be maintained by future development by Orono conservation design principles. i. Landmarks—no landmarks exist on the current property. 5. N/A 6. N/A 7. Long Term Preservation—The future property owners will maintain Areas A, B, and C, and the wetlands. 8. The future property owner will agree to the items specified in this document by covenant agreement with the Ciity of Orono. Thank you for the opportunity to serve you on this site. Sincerely, Wayne E.Jacobson, P.S.S.,W.D.C., P.W.S., A.F.S. Senior Scientist Jacobson Environmental, PLLC. APPENDIX A Conservation Design Checklist City of Orono— Conservation Design Checklist BASIC APPLICATION AND PLAN REQUIREMENTS Sec. 78-1634. Application requirements and procedures. Item Development Steps Action Item 1. Review and provide written response to the Goals and Policies for Environmental Protection and Natural Resource Management as established in the Orono Community Management Plan and the recommendations contained within in the Orono Natural Resources Inventory. The intent is to establish the property's ecological connections both within Orono and as part of the regional ecological system. 2. Rural Oasis Study If the property exists adjacent to a documented corridor in the Rural Oasis Study, review and respond to the existing aesthetic and ecological analysis. If the property is NOT adjacent to a documented corridor in the Rural Oasis Study, developer shall have a qualified consultant prepare a similar analysis and submit it to the city for review. This analysis shall include the documentation of: a. Views, b. Corridor enclosure, c. And landmarks through a plan analysis and photographs. Developer shall be charged a standard fee established in the city fee schedule to cover the expenses of the city in hiring a consultant to review the ecological site analysis submitted by the developer. 3. Natural Resource Inventory. Include all the following elements: a. Review and document the MLCCS data pertinent to the site. b. Tree survey OK Include all significant individual trees greater than six in. diameter, and stands of trees, identifying tree species and size. Not needed because tree habitat dominated by Box Elder nearly exclusively. c. Wetland Inventory and Wetland Buffer OK Include delineation reports. d. Topographic survey OK Include existing drainage patterns e. Site Analysis Analysis of the site based on the findings and recommendations of the Orono Natural Resources Inventory with regards to: • Conceptual greenways and open space corridors; • Existence of rare plant communities; • Potential need for proactive management and protection. Sec. 78-1635. Basic Conservation Design Master Plan requirements and evaluation criteria. Item Conservation Design Master Plan Action Item 4. a. Consideration of the existing drainage system OK b. Stormwater Management Plan Establishment of a storm water management system, using multi-cell treatment principles, and defining proposed methods of storm water phosphorus reduction c. Invasive Species Removal and Management Plan d. Tree Mitigation and Diseased Tree Plan e. Tree Protection Plan Protection of significant tree stands and woodlands that support scenic and/or ecological goals, including mitigation of any such stands to be impacted by development activities. f. Wetland Protection and Mitigation Plan Protection of existing wetlands, including augmentation of buffers, mitigation of impacts, and enhancement of degraded systems. g. Justification and mitigation of any negative impact to ecological communities. "Negative Impact"includes any modification to a lower level of ecological community quality, as described by the Minnesota Land Cover Classification System (M-34X Modifiers) — h. Define Maintenance of Ecological Connections Through site design, as shown on the Orono Natural Resource Inventory i. Views Maintenance and protection of existing positive views, and mitigation of any existing or proposed negative views using appropriate measures such as site layout,screening, building design and coloration, etc. j. Landmarks Preservation or reinterpretation of existing landmarks DENSITY BONUS STANDARDS Item Sec. 78-1636. Density bonuses for urban density development. Action Item 5. For residential development in Orono's defined urban area (zoning districts allowing densities in excess of one unit per two acres, and including properties identified in the Orono Community Management Plan for conversion to urban density) within the ranges of the guided density & density bonus may be allowed if the city council finds that the performance bonus requirements of this division have been met. The city council shall NA determine the extent of density bonus awarded for such properties. Example: Properties guided in the Community Management Plan for a density range of two —four units per acre have a base density of two units per acre; while the high end of the density range is not guaranteed, the city council at its discretion may allow development at a final density of up to four units per acre through the performance bonus process. Item Sec. 78-1637. Performance bonus requirements Action Item 6. Within the urban density area, developers have the opportunity to increase the base density by going above and beyond the Basic Conservation design Master Plan requirement. By implementing a combination of development enhancements that not only preserve but improve the natural characteristics NA of the property or preserve and enhance existing landmarks, the developer shall become eligible for a density bonus. The extent of such density bonus shall be determined by the city council. Development enhancements include but are not necessarily limited to the following: a. Reforestation beyond existing woodland limits; NA b. Water quality Improvements: NA c. Improvements in ecological grade of existing communities; NA d. Upgrading of edge buffering to maximum, or tunneled, character; and NA e. Major preservation or enhancement of existing landmarks. NA LONG-TERM PRESERVATION Item Sec. 78-1638. Preservation Requirements Action Item 7. The developer shall establish and implement measures that will ensure the preservation and maintenance of those elements of the development that are determined to require long-term or permanent protection from development or misuse. Such measures may include but are not limited to: conservation easements; deed restrictions; private covenants; transfer of ownership to agencies such as the Minnesota Land Trust or the Nature conservancy, or to the city via dedication, etc. Item Sec. 78-1639. Buyer Education. Action Item 8. The developer shall establish covenants documenting the elements of the development to be protected and how they are to be protected, and shall establish a defined program for education of the initial purchasers of lots Submit within the development as to the limitations that affect future use of the property. Sub 78-1640. Resources. The primary references for facilitating the conservation design process include:he following: • Orono Rural Oasis Study (DSU, 2005). • 2008-2030 City of Orono Community Management Plan, Chapter 3A— Environmental Protection Plan (City of Orono, 2009). • Orono Natural Resources Inventory (Hennepin County Department of Environmental Services/Bonestroo Natural Resources Group, 2006). • Minnesota Land Cover Classification System (MLCCS). FIGURES Figure 1 Site Location Map 93 38.000'W 93°37 000 W ° y 93 3G 000 W WGS84 93°35.000'W '-'''''';.-1,,_A• r S Int r - ag ' f d 'r` m i ?p `. A ...:.--7,9-7...,,,,,,c ,€ p 'tl 1 r „::„.,...,:,--5::-:-_.--.:,(' ,,... � _. t (j• }°,�°51''� �� yi'r;(-.:,, ` y _"s. 3t 4- r Z ,▪ ,, _.:-.4:14,,,,,,,T2 - rr> o ,,` t °*` .•-;%-....---.1'.";,''',%".1) * ». '.:7.m( ;Pl . =/ / 1, i, •«r I,. ,--t 4.' � t f ¢ V. am( t _. +.i.. 1'. `°;' -`. t (. ✓-._ :, •-. --„It.t" .` '' : . 14' f k --:-."'s-, _ _ � f! '.' '�"''s ^„,gya s ,A, j7\ �.,s i• .Y"-y`( +.- �� � 5 ../-,,,,j:e �� ` °!�[Vl..{ # „ { �` • �. }R4 4� y;- 4S 1 ti f ALV ''''..---,...•.- s M� •-• - , , E' R # t .'t •« t f { ', ', @^r..-3,, • ..r- _it 7 ..r*..,,:::'�J 1- ; ,,.. ji rr •141•:-$1\ #� r ' n Katavna i ..;',1, T w ,�lrp-, i ° �C'Si r I Ot t a '. ', ICtl,e r e.. �`'. .i " - ©E r IYy .ti '��'�3' ♦` _1 t t{ ,,, / 4 >` `. - 4,. -.4---;', SCS f ' (r p� ,..„\,,,,.. �+eTlb . .r , 'tom i � .„.••• 'fr _ a ��'_ to }�` .., a t�,,.,C- 5' win.,,Rd ,ony,_, '.r ti ` z l :,‘•-•-• . +' :.,-5'1%5•1;,',.':. O� 1i.:. e Slyer•►� ` �� '',Vel, i�Joh. -,.-A-:::•.' �'���I I w � ---'1,-,11...--....1,,•:,1,-,- J� � 2.` ++,.� ,� j�� ..� .. Z o j ,, , ..-'f-77-;" . i 3 --Z....-.-4'. .ice •. l ', _-�r • re/ =S�•� 'Yf"..1 's .- 7 P '{ IL\ l .«,,..,.-,,.-ate- CIS _ �-. 41'- re 6„,,,,,,,,,,, ,....,_:.a . �� il„2 • • y _, . .)., . . . ,..d r .._ ,,,, . t," 1 -4e j t ��'� a +' - � ,gypA3 , ,,� fir . -, Sy� q& { op,i, :i 11 _- r F ` ° Pii i .ti -'a alt .. �.P Yi�� ._ �✓1 .�`' t'':'....1:,,,,..;:t','.;J �. .•� _�, � l4 6 �, '�7:.e �Ai. r 1 ��;.�� � �4 y:`�. -t t # �.'A1 "7 sErP �}l. F�r ^.. ` l4 ( ...?u . •S x •:rte, ( d }} � >]!7▪1 /.?" 1 F 11!• --. -.-;"i7x--,_-,„--- vi ii O ! xCh �'- G,•),..‘'1A.:;;,4...,--:,., 4F-'.7/-1,,, ,j)- $.'R- q� L.. i':,-:::.- a � • i Z r #$ # �') tl1.--t 1 # :-, _# _„:`-r-,... � R ;y'�d I R a1 w. '.g ,' ? o noi LUS.e.LI e�h 0 W >4 a .. 1 i _ = 0 °v � � I�.. �fett �\,.,0-\.-,_,-..,,___, W43, • r: � ,f ..-7-':' �xsTrlfr � frt�`.c. a ( �,�' iii / ��� �� ` � a � ' h v (._ -.-' �.:- ,',.42,), - ` 1 s r W e(t61Y_'q,_ `Y'� 1�.. i' t� tiT :41.‘•-•,,..,-'-'.--',4''. t /.` ` r 7 '-•rte t f{i, . R!� Sir - --'4',=:v G,L in �� ,cr / ;';.,..• ° 0 „ 1 < ` , ' .„, EFiI . t ..,T,a y -„''°• r prej va .;!iht•€1�, • `� -rd - ar '� •!1= 1. s t W (yam '. J., ?.`' titititiJJJJ �•. 4 - U-- . ,_/ � tcj,e Fq rir. a_'3 � N N[ +7 ° �' •u�. • 1 1{ Z t m a 1SkSfC n ci °yt 3 u: ,.1•t t r�3 .v. _ °.-./rSn x t t o V. '`''7�r ,47- 151' ��j�..�����:��i `.� 4` --'..-‘,7.-,,,,,!-: s.� �� �*� � s� Q...� 'rq � S � '. �_ f, ) : Axa. '$ �` W ' ,; ..„,, ,,. .„:.' .r�� 'ct ww +. -` a a \ ..,� a r sr � ;'Ll•rr +a#r r# m` „,'+'t �",�mI!r a ' r f ...- . �` ,. a + t x F r �gg� * s ; r .. '��� Mrd 1 v ,• •+t. a CC l t� l t(11r�`�v�.''''''1,' � L .� FL ;� tr � ys � :,,,,..t.,'.=,-;'.- -� '�5 ''C 5pt, i i • )M.�_ r "„' I: ' t1dP e ec th�70P O. 007. kaYn -' * ' L£;v o o"'T ',,el /.4Oo 'ram 1�J >e Gss 3 000'W L: �' i `93°338..0000,',W 93°37.000'W 93°36.000'W WGS84 93°35.000'W NATIONAL $ �_ �, I g TNF�,�N GEt�t;RAPHIC °° — ,ov2° ! o, TEI$ Ho . Mt TEAS ,000 04/01/16 Figure 2 Grading Plan LEGEND U.SHIGHWAY N4 12 — MAW POLE HYDRANT poso---COSTOLG CONTOUR -- OVERHEAD PARE s SANITARY SERER •.Mi.E E%ISIING LLNAMMI. Zg Sp.ECRM ._-_.......-...... ' i a 4�B9SbI y El cAsicTEB \ �- I :fie N. •K vP ;o, ,$4p �/'0 a-- °°`. � .4;,..,, ,f" .¢^ELECT=SELER/90% �u..oms "'REPRESExrs THE TAGGED TR¢ O-Bna c u d,,o4Pi T�.\Vs. •$ 7� •. 9WPlIFDRARER�Ub iAOY WA TREE AR r� : _ -90)-, , I �, Qp \ 6 b 4 3! � �� 1 .,� t-----40 �, LL-BBg3 R .. Noi �� �s ® _ .�� rwbocxr 1- • . J�/\) e % =i�t,.'�4,r3 a,.,,a�.�S.�.,.�:Pno�mm'unwio RIPPER AREA TE-See _V\lk SOP•.-v -.<--g.�'+�1�...w�� �/S M` ; S N ',l..ati��_S.i3 BEBum WADED AREA El :.i.�.r=��tAicB'� g�-- i ® F� T.; CATCH BAbw SOS BORING \ u-RBIs —�` � - �m wrtAarsmB MANHOLE ,/ / \� - \\ ■ LLLLn....tO i� � /e ?It' tii y,,1„/, f � °,,°$PDR.POLE Aero OVERHEAD SIRES / 1(\\\ 1 �;/I�WIL�. / f .` p `,'.ate' `I�` .•r ' ,�• ° � 'l r ���' GRAM rnNUE E SURFACE • - / / � / - /f, •a b 'If B.. -mom .a��� "OWNS r, s:' ✓'i,, ^• • umrc TOLE WE PROPERTY i x / .., -. J( LK .. L',.// ->>-STORY SERER .. L 1 ' -I-WATER vuN • ( - OOErrouois SHIRE ma / .. ----I010---PROPOSED OTRITOoR Q MEOWS SHRUB 11---14)mons PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATOR \I , -_ Is ly Vii)), a N iii_ l1.1 �-J--I N_:. • erem...� I i Nr ua a q�.P..R�e„ \ I I 7 . CeS1 low P.... n,,... . 1,,,,,.-,.,,,��_,Sr�r CIoI 4 '�C n�tCnr���n� I IPNo.ecr Ho: PRE11Na o.m x ..,se, ....swan aro ORI ' V :-: -'J J....-. f3� GRADING PLAN -.ENGINEERING-- -rte RmwB Pre.Yma .15-039 -.--_. . NO !DEE er I R DESORPTION SERVICES,INC m'0-r'Anu 'G.. 1 w=a. Y � I LAKE WEST LLC "°• •^B'm^ YortF P.Campbn-LN.R,BBOI Das ORONO,MN SHEET NO. 7 OF 12 SHEETS O 113/23/2016 Soil Map—Hennepin County,Minnesota (Figure 3 Soils Mao) 451810 451900 451590 452080 452170 452260 452350 452440 452530 452620 0 44°59'24'N $ i . I ........... -...-. 4: m 44°59'24'N a v 1***,i-.V.;,.:„.,.....„..4.-„,..., :,..„ ..;,,,,,,,,,,z:-.,e'-4--,:::....--- . x t. 00 m v r a . :+a, as *+ ' * .a. ..........„..„,,,,,,,..7.,t„....2 ,....., .,„ 4w\ • a4 a „ 5 ti ''.t. .mco v. o ,LT,' R • m 44°59,7'N m 44 59'7'5 ----. -.--. 451810 451900 __. 451990. 452080. __ -_.452170 452260 452350 '452440 42530 452520 3 Map Scale:1:3,860 it printed on A landscape(11"x 8.5)sheet Me.__ M •N 0 SO 100- -_-200 .. 300 �� Feet 0 150 300 600 900 Map projection:Web Merrator Comer coordinates:WGS84 Edge tics:LFTM Zone 15N WGS84 USDA Natural Resources 4/1/2016 Conser va ini entj Natienal-Cooperative Web Soil Survey Sail-purvey Page 1 of 3 Soil Map—Hennepin County,Minnesota Figure 3 Soils Mao Map Unit Legend Hennepin County,Minnesota(MN053) • I Map Un Symb""ol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI" ' Percept of AbI . LISA !Muskego,Blue Earth,and 44.1 f 66.3%1' Houghton soils,ponded,0 to 1 percent slopes I_22C2 !Lester loam,6 to 10 percent 8.61 12.9%1'1 1 slopes,moderately eroded I.37g Angus loam,2 to 6 percent 6.2 9.4%' slopes 1 IJ2A I Udorthents,wet substratum,0 7.6 11.4% I to 2 percent slopes Totals for Area of Interest 66.6 100.0%11 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 4/1/2016 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 Figure 4 Aerial with Landscape Plantings , 1 4.I '''.:::;'*-7'.4i74 , ,_- i "'i�x A _ -.. .. lYZATA BLVC „ p . i �SNI k }�'4 .�'t' S\ t : 11 � ;:-:. ::".....'';,' • ll5, .+/ x..c ^'r _I -n _ • - r+�/ A 7` �=�" r 2 n � :- RYx , 4 yap .z w xc�oco�,.. CERTIFICATION 14901 63RD CLIENT PROJECT ,,__4r �e I I 10CATION �� SHEET NUMBER .s�.Vs •,o �y`•reiy u,.,,Rn n.�. PLACE NORTH �,io..,RmRwRa 1,9i\a)i�2i i t>t S LLe PRELIMINARY AERIAL L Pnw,.a W m. ,una,Rry MAPLE GROVE, LANDSCAPE WITH a _ a,.awp uo a:nan Rxen MN 55311 LAKE WEST EISINGER ORONO, .mzam u a • ,, Proms' Phone: DEVELOPMENT' MEADOWS MN PLANTINGS ORM'/H By un F,cMOIX 612-566-6%06 - - . - - -NOT FOR �� .—- _ a,caKEnev ; meseleoMIfln a ----- - -_. Kath aoconnell ..CONSTRUCTION- ,oe»� y @gma,l.com , 1 ' "'© wayiz:at=ai3:W.,GiaW F3a 1f.k ay.,2).atariBly.dztN qcon=Wtt "11,27;1 'rt + x: .. . 2 0.Sp 2-i talc _ d 4 , d4C ' . SPA] I;TI} _ , (Si . .'".:JY.Jir.;......,,Y...,',,,44,K.vs....!..,%,,,?',:::!4..,1t..,,,kT,, ,„.7..,-.., ,,..: ,, \ , a . :. s . •0 . ` r47s 1 titi �a v, n 1 =i .... 0 Sample Points x41k, 4 ximate Wetland y m. _. •: __ - Approximate Parcel etlaBoundary T118N R23W S32 AnnroYim ate Wetlanr� Bound ries Figure S Overlaid on 2012 Aerial Photo j V ' ` .s.r 3s'd`te 2013-038 1 n 1 Ecological Resources K� " 250 500 1,000 3245 Wayzata Blvd W Feet O�ot�o,-ixi�v Hennepin Hennepin County Property Map Date:3/18/2(716 Figure 6 Overall Preliminary Area Conservajtion plan lan' l I' T" .,' 1,� — Its • II- '« '. • j I r xl • ."•;#•:"..,-:,i;, key, "�' aw k a •,,.t # fit,, x a 4 i �� t 'gym.. t ;rte t r 1 � I r • r ' e� 4 # x� L,, 1t yy.447� t Citi „ ; s n � ,.� :� -' .� '' _ , ! 1 . : c ... :� �. `` 4 1 inch =800 feet • PARCEL ID: 3211823140002 Comments: OWNER NAME: Lakewest LIc "' iei ` t Figure 4 Site Map PARCEL ADDRESS: 3245 Wayzata Blvd W, Orono MN 55356 --- PROPERTY TYPE Vacant Land-Rural Residential "�*] 'i '�'�'y►e�'t ✓6rf56�t 44,,t G�.(d..kiav✓s rs HOMESTEAD: Non-Homestead Ve: 07 PARCEL AREA:25.8 acres, 1,123,933 sq ft ,�,-_ A T B:Abstract tiR 415 MARKET VALUE: $135,000 This data(i)is furnished'AS IS'Wth no TAX TOTAL: $1,310.86 representation as to completeness or accuracy;(ii)is furnished with no warranty of any kind;and(iii)is notsui table SALE PRICE: forlegal,engineeringorsurveyingpurpases.i Hennepin County shall not be liable forany damage,injury or loss resulting from this dedd. SALE DATA: COPYRIGHT©HENNE:PIN SALE CODE: COUNTY 2016 • Hennepin Hennepin County Property Map Date: 3/2.3/2016 --- ^, . . Via, 1 , _~j.` Figure 7 Site Detail Conservation Plan ;. ,. AREA A �'� . • i i. AREA B AREA • ''' '' . • ',..'-' ''..li'..-1'7.1i.' '''-'::I `rk ; F x #fie 6ce � -- b' f ir i ,. 1 inch =400 feet PARCEL ID: 3211823140002 cw4 pool rizeGti Comments: OWNER NAME: Lakewest LIc PARCEL ADDRESS: 3245 Wayzata Blvd W, Orono MN 55356 PROPERTY TYPE:Vacant Land-Rural Residential HOMESTEAD: Non-Homestead PARCEL AREA:25.8 acres, 1,123,933 sq ft t 3.2 tarries A-T-B:Abstract MARKET VALUE: $135,000 This data(i)is furnished'ASIS'with no representation as to completeness or TAX TOTAL: $1,310.86 accuracy;(ii)is furnished with no warranty of any kind;and(iii)is notsuitabl for legal,engineering or resultisurveying purposes. SALE PRICE: Hennepin County shall not be:liable forar♦y damage,injury or loss hg from this data. SALE DATA: COPYRIGHT©HENNEPIN SALE CODE: COUNTY 2016 I i Figure 8 Top of Bluff Buffer Plan Y • ��� 'i .. �' 1 . ttt ; 1 .t itlpi _ _ _ ....__ , � 9 i -...>.. _ .. . ::fix — __ _... �..,�...... .� ..,. .� — <,,_^=•—,^ _ —"+az s „._,.,.,... ...:,.., - , 2-'''''''''' . .,• is. { t i• i� • • —,...7:1--;1:-.,',:''''''-'—'7"17.--::---i-Z.:...._.-___•' ,,,,,,_.:HL,;,„ , ..., A...,,.i. — .----- • „ ''''',' _., F x , �` • • • • t' - - _ -- -. • y t' - — _ — _ AIL v-a... f. *sem, The State of Minnesota and the Minnesa�Department of Natural Renou s makes norepresentations . or warranties expressed or implied,with respect to the use of maps or geographice data provided Vons acas ao� o.'.c herewith regardless of its format or the means of its transmiss on.There is no guarantee or representation to the user as to the accuracy,curency,suitability,or reliabilityof this data for any purpose.The user accepts the data"as is." Scale:1:4,752 N The State of Minnesota assumes no responsibility for loss or damage incurred as a result of any user reliance on this data.All maps and other material provided herein are protected by copyright Extreme care was used during the compilation of this product.However,due t°5 changes in ownership and • the need to rely on outside information,errors or omissions may ex st.If you should discover an oversight, we encourage you to let us know by calling the DNR at 1-888-646-6367 or by e-mail at info.dnr@smte.mn.us. o : _:_ Created_on4/30/2016 No : �.o olrl,l,oy2s-ant,-contours-werrgenerateu'from iiDnR derived elevation surfaces acquired 2007-2012.. Appendix A Buffer Establishment and Management Plan For 3245 Wayzata Boulevard West Orono, MN April 30, 2016 I. Overview: This project is for the establishment of several bluff buffer areas and for Area A, Area B. and Area C as shown in the attached plan to effectively buffer adjacent wetlands as shown on the attached Figure 7 Site Detail Conservation Plan and the Figure 8 Top of Bluff Buffer plan. The maintained buffers will depend primarily upon surface water from adjacent land to maintain the necessary hydrology. II. General Project Goals: The primary goal of this project is to maintain buffer areas that will preserve arid enhance the functions and values of the current buffer. An ongoing buffer maintenance plan will be employed in this case. There may be some variation from these guidelines where timing and site conditions warrant modification. Five years of aftercare are planned to control invasive species such as canada thistle, stinging nettle, garlic mustard, bull thistle, purple loosestrife, common buckthorn, and spotted knapweed in the buffer or managed areas. III. Specific Buffer Type Goals: The goal of this project is to maintain or establish the following: - Grassed bluff buffers as shown on the attached Figure 8 from the 986 contour or the black line to the tree line which is to the west, south, or east of the black line to the tree edge which is principally box elder(Acer negundo). - Common Buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica) of over 1" dhh cut off at the ground in Area B as shown in Figure 7 and stumps sprayed with glysophosphate as recommended in the Appendix. - A native grass buffer established in Area C on Figure 7. Below is a summary of the specific areas of buffer maintenance as shown on the Centum- Farm Vv'MC Declaration Plan: Buffer Size Size Area (ft.2) (acres) Buffer Type Bluff TBD TBD Preserved Grassed Buffer of 30 - 50 feet on the south B TBD TBD Preserved Wooded Buffer, Buckthorn Controlled C TBD TBD Preserved Grassed Buffer Total = TBD TBD IV. Planting Considerations if areas are disturbed and not just maintained: Prior to establishing the contours on the buffer areas careful removal and sorting of the sod and native soils must take place to minimize contamination by seed and roots of invasive species. 1 Maintenance Methods Bluff Area In the Bluff buffer area the buffer area will initially have buffer monumentation placed approximately every 200 feet along buffer edges. Area B In buffer area B the buffer area will initially have buffer monumentation placed approximately every 200 feet along buffer edges. Area C In buffer area C the buffer area will initially have buffer monumentation placed approximately every 200 feet along buffer edges. Next year vegetative management will occur with spot spraying and weed whipping of areas, followed by Escort or Glysophosphate application to weed areas needing control. Seed will be spread if necessary per the below seed specifications if needed. V. Seeding Specifications if Planted: a. Timing of Seeding: Due to the small size of most buffer seed varieties, all seed will be broadcast. To maximize success, the planting of seed can only occur within two small windows, April 1 to June 30 or September 1 to December 1. b. Seed Mix and Installation Specifications*: The grassy buffer maintained areas will be seeded with Mix 35-541 at 12.0 pounds of pure live seed per acre. Cover crops specified for each mix will be seeded with each mix in accordance with BWSR mix specifications. The Appendix contains the specifications for the seed mixes specified. Below is a table and summary of seed mixes. Rate Est. Total Amt. Seed Mix (lb./ac..) Seed Used (lbs.) Mesic Prairie Southwest Seed Mix 12.0 TBD *Note: See "Guidelines for Restoring and Managing Native Wetland Vegetation" for seed mix percentages and specifications for seed density on a square foot basis. c. Site Preparation and Seeding Technique: The upland buffer areas will be dragged after the seed is broadcast as needed to achieve proper seed to soil contact. Straw mulch will be applied at 1.5 tons per acre and disk anchored where possible. On any slopes in the buffer area exceeding a 10 percent slope, straw erosion blanket will be installed after seeding. VI. Prevention of Introduction of Invasive Species: It is important that any topsoil that is placed on the site be free of any rhizomes and seed from vegetation that is undesirable in a buffer. Therefore it is imperative that the coordination between the grading contractor and the environmental consultant is adhered to carefully as specified earlier in this Appendix. Also, any mulch used should free of weed seed. Certified Weed Free Mulch, grain straw, arid wood fiber mulch is acceptable. Under no circumstances may hay, wild hay, alfalfa, or marsh hay he used as mulch. VII. Aftercare/Invasive Species Management: It is critical to any buffer restoration project to provide monitoring and aftercare for several seasons until the late successional wetland species are established. Aftercare will include spot spraying two times during the first growing season (June, August), two times during each year(June and late August) for years 2 and 3, and once a year in years 4 and 5. Target species of the spraying program include, but are not limited to, Canada Thistle, Bull Thistle, Garlic Mustard, Spotted Knapweed, Purple Loosestrife, Common Buckthorn, and Stinging Nettle. Spot mowing and inter-seeding will be done as necessary, as determined by monitoring. Common Buckthorn control methods are attached in the Appendix of this document. VIII. Pre-Maintenance Meeting: The success of a buffer maintenance plan relies to a large part on the coordination of the efforts of the owner, the environmental consultant, and the seeding contractor so that the needs and requirements of each party are realized. Therefore, a pre-maintenance meeting must be held for the benefit of all parties to allow questions to be fielded and to provide a tentative project schedule. This plan was prepared by Wayne Jacobson, PSS, WDC on April 30, 2016. Contact Information: Wayne Jacobson, Certified Wetland Delineator Jacobson Environmental, PLLC 5821 Humboldt Avenue North Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Phone: 612-802-6619 Email:jacobsonenv@msn.com 3 Appendix: (seed mix specifications and buckthorn control methods) 4 35-541 Mesic Prairie Southwest Common Name Scientific Name Rate Rate % of Mir. Seeds/ J (kg/ha) (Ibiac) (% by wt) -sq ft - big bluestem Andropogon gerardii J1JJ 1.01 0 90 7.49% 3.30 side-oats grams Bouteloua curtipendula _1.01 0 90 7.49% 1.98 nodding wild rye Elymus canadensis r 1.01 0 90 7.46% 1.71_ slender wheatgrass Elymus trachycaulus 1.01 0.90 _ 7.46% 2.27_ green needle grass Nassel/a viridula 0.49 0.44 3.67% 1.70 __ switchgrass Panicum virgatum 0.18 0.16 1.30% _-0.80_ western wheatgrass Pascopyrum smithii -__ 0.56 0.50 4.15% 1.30 little bluestem - Schizachyrium scoparium 1.68 1.50 12.50% 8.27 - Indian grass Sorghastrum nutans 1.68 1.50 12.54% 6.63 Total Grasses 8.63 7.70 64.06% 27.96 Canada milk vetch Astragalus canadensis 0.07 0.06 0.53% 0.40 partridge pea - Chamaecrista fasciculata 0.11 0.10 0.84% 0.10 white prairie clover Dalea candida 0.03 0.03 0.24% 0.20_ purple prairie clover Dalea purpurea _ 0.08 0.07 0.61% 0.40 Canada tick trefoil Desmodium canadense 0.06 0.05 0.45% 0.11 narrow-leaved purple coneflower Echinacea angustifolia O.09 _0.08 0.65% _ 0.2C_ ox-eye Heliopsis helianthoides 0.07 0.06 0.50% 0.14 rough blazing star Liatris aspera 0.03 a03 0.28% _ 0.2C_ great blazing star Liatris pycnostachya 0.02 0.02 0.21% 0.1C wild bergamot Monarda fistulosa 0.04 0.04 0.29% 0.9C^ stiff goldenrod Oligoneuron rigidum 0 C3 0.03 0.28% 0.5C_ gray-headed coneflower Ratibida pinnata 0.08 0.07 0.61% 0.80_ black-eyed susan Rudbeckia hirta 0.07 0.06 0.49% 2.0C smooth aster Symphyotrichum laeve 0.03 _D.03 _ 0.25% _ 0.60 blue vervain Verbena hastata 0 08 D.07 0.61% 2.50_ hoary vervain Verbena stricta 0 06 D.05 0.41% 0.50 golden alexanders Zizia aurea 0 28 0.25 2.064%> 1.00 Total Forbs 1.23 1.10 9.31% 10.65 Oats or winter wheat(see note at beginning of list for recommended dates) j 3 59 3.20 26.63% 1.42 Total Cover Crop3.59 3.20 26.63% 1.42 Totals: 13.45 12.00 100.00% 40.03 Purpose: Regional mesic prairie reconstruction for wetland mitigation, ecological restoration, or conservation program plantings. Planting Area: North-Central Glaciated Plains Section, Mn/DOT Districts 3A(southwest)3B, 4(south), 7&8. APPENDIX B Buckthorn Removal Guidelines HERBICIDE TREATMENTS Tiime to Apply For larger buckthorn reduction or control projects,some type of chemical treatment is the best control method, A single stem of buckthom cut down to the ground and not herbicide-treated will re-sprout from the stump and grow many new stems up to 8 feet tall in a single season."If you cut it,you just anger it,"says Norm Erickson,a buckthorn-busting volunteer from Rochester.This aggressive,"Medusa-like"re-growth must be stopped or the plant will soon reach its former size,take up more space,and continue to out-compete the native plants. It is important NOT to treat during the spring-flush growth period,usually May and June. This is a time when the plant.is using its stored energy reserves to grow,until the plant is fully leafed out. During the spring-flush,the plant generally does not store energy,it spends energy. Herbicide treatments work best when the plant is transporting sugars to its root system or is dormant(July through March). Summer,autumn,and winter are the three seasons when herbicide treatment is effective. Late September through November is an especially good time,because this is when buckthorn is easiest to identify: leaves remain green and attached while leaves of our native plants are turning color and falling. When using herbicides,always follow label instructions and take recommended safety precautions.Be certain that your herbicide is labeled for your site.See page 6 for herbicide suggestions. Cut-Stump Method with herbicide During cutting and brush-hauling operations,stumps are easily lost under leaves and debris,particularly in later fall. Marking stump locations with wire flags(similar to those used by utilities to mark underground wires or pipes)is very helpful when it comes time to locate the stump for treatment after an area has been cleared. Secure the flags well,so they too will not be dragged away with the brush. Stumps can be chemically treated with a paint-brush(single-use foam brushes work well),a wick applicator,or an ultra low volume spray wand. Apply chemical to the outermost growth rings immediately under the bark. It is very important that water-based herbicides are applied soon after the cut, 13e especially quick to apply herbicide if the air is warm&dry. There is NO NEED to drill holes in the stump and pour chemical as some labels suggest—this over- exposes you and the environment to herbicide. See concentration amounts next page. Frill-Cuts with herbicide Frill cuts can be made on any size stem and are made by wounding the bark at the base of the plant with an axe or hatchet(a butcher knife will work on small stems).Cut through the bark and cambium at a downward angle with a series of light,shallow chops around the basal circumference of the tree. These cuts create a frill(bark&wood flap). Next,apply herbicide(paint brush or spray)to exposed cut areas and inner bark.Chemical contact with the cambium(the layer just under the bark)is very important. This is a good method to stop female trees from producing fruit and to minimize erosion on slopes(no soil disturbance). If you physically remove all the buckthorn, you set up the site for erosion.Buckthorn can be left standing for bird habitat or as a leafless trellis for native vines. Once dry,standing dead trees can decompose in place or be cut down and used for firewood or wood working. Basal Bark Treatment with Herbicide When mixed with a diluent(a solvent containing dye that can be mixed with some herbic:des),ester formulations of Triclopyr can be applied directly to the bark at the base of the tree to provide effective control. Spray the lowest two feet of bark around the entire circumference of the tree. For diameters 2 inches or less,only one side of the stem needs to be sprayed. This is a fast,effective way of controlling larger trees up to 6 inches;in diameter on large sites. Dead trees can be left standing or cut at a later time. Garlon 4,Crossbow,and Pathfinder II(ready to use), conaining the active ingredient Tryclopyr,are effective brand-name chemicals for basal bark treatment. 5 Herbicides that work well on buckthorn: Do NOT use more chemical than you need! If a little is good,a lot is not better. 1.0ypjlosate is the active ingredient in Roundup(now off patent),Ortho Basic Solutions Weed&Grass Killer Concentrate,and others.This herbicide is a good choice since it does not leach through the soil.Use it for cut-stump and frill treatments. Many different concentrations are available. Check the fine print in the lower label corner. • 10 to 25% active ingredient is needed for cut-stump and frill treatments+. • Apply to a fresh cut when temperatures are above freezing. • Only 2%active ingredient is necessary for foliar spray(best for seedlings in the late fall). 2.Tryclopyramine is the active ingredient in Garton 3A and Ortho Brush 13-Gon. • Mix with water for cut stump,frill,and foliar applications • Use goggles when spraying,since exposure to this chemical can cause a burning sensation in eyes • For the cut-stump and frill method,apply immediately after cutting 3.Tryclopyr ester is the active ingredient in Garlon 4,Crossbow&Pathfinder. (Pathfinder is ready-to-use.) • Mix with diluent or Kerosene for cut-stump,frill and basal bark treatments • Can be used when the temperature is below freezing No Garton 3a needs to be applied immediately after the cut.Garton 4 can be used long after the cut because it is solvent-based and will penetrate the stump and bark. Tordon RTU is NOT RECOMMENDED because it leaches through the soil,is persistent in the soil,and can affect roots of other plants. Wet Sites: For areas directly adjoining wetlands,ponds,creeks,and lakes,you must use an herbicide labeled for aquatic use, like Rodeo.* This is necessary when working within ten feet of the shoreline. Use the same rates as Roundup, above. *Rodeo is now beyond its legal patent. The glyphosate product may be offered for sale under other brand names such as Aque.Neat. Tim for sprayini in a dense buckthorn thicket 1. In densely infested areas,use a hand-held tank sprayer;backpack sprayers can be difficult to negotiate through the woods. 2. An ultra low volume spray wand(available through"http://www.arborchem.com")can cut chemical use by 75%. 3. Be sure to wear appropriate protective clothing when using chemicals,especially when mixing concentrate. Use neoprene or chemical resistant gloves,not latex,cloth,or leather. Wear goggles or safety glasses when mixing chemicals. Be certain to read and follow label instructions. VVhere to buy the herbicides • Glyphosate herbicides are readily available at hardware stores,Menards,Home Depot,etc. Be certain to look for active ingredient concentration between 10&25%for cut stump and frill treatment uses. • Garton herbicides can be purchased through local agriculture,turf,and horticulture co-op suppliers or wholesalers. BRUSH DISPOSAL OPTIONS 1. utilize:salvage buckthorn for firewood&/or wood-working(trellises,arbors,fences,walking sticks,etc.) 2. Chip:chip brush and spread on trails 6"deep or in the woods 1-2"deep. Not recommendedfor branches with fruit. 3. Cut-slash is to cut up and leave the wood on the ground;wood/soil contact can reduce erosion and create habitat for amp:Libians,small mammals,and insects;aesthetics is a consideration. 4. Cut&haul:check with your garbage hauler or tree service;Minnetonka's resident brush drop at Public Works is open April through mid November. 4. Burn:recommended for branches with fruit containing viable seed;burn permit is required;contact your local fire ma-shal. 5. Brush piles provide wildlife habitat&cover for songbirds,amphibians,and small mammals. Note:Minnetonka Public Nuisance ordinance does not allow brush piles(neatly stacked wood is okay). 6. Energy conversion: District Energy in St.Paul bums wood waste to generate heat&electricity.Some cities have their brush ground and transported there. 6 HOPE FOR A BIOLOGICAL CONTROL "Good news came this month,"wrote Cynthia Boyd in the St.Paul Pioneer Press,Sept.26,2001,"in a$20,001) report commissioned by the Minnesota Depaituient of Natural Resources from the Center for Applied Bioscience International in Delmont,Switzerland. The 100 page research paper includes a list of 14 insects that are possible natural predators(of buckthorn),thus potential control agents."According to Luke Skinner and Jay Rendall, coordinators in the DNR's exotic species program,the feasibility study was completed in 2001,but the entire study may take up to ten years to complete. The next step will be to test the 14 species and determine which ones harm buckthorn exclusively. In the mean-time it is up to us to make an effort to control buckthorn in an ecologically- friendly way. Then we will see the return of our native plants. OVERWHELMED BY IT ALL? If'you've worked in a heavily buckthorn-infested area,it is easy to feel overwhelmed. Don't give up. Buckthorn has had decades to get a root-hold ahead of those of us who would like to eliminate it. With the control methods described here,total elimination of buckthorn on a city lot is possible. In larger wooded areas the volume of buckthorn biomass can be staggering. There,it will be a multi-year battle::fi st against the large plants,later against the seedlings that will emerge. The cost in terms of human-power,time,equipment,and dollars is high. Reduction of the critical mass is possible;so prioritization is essential. Knowing what to do and doing something is far better than leaving the invasion unchecked. See priorities below for a good place to start. BUCKTHORN REDUCTION PRIORITIES FOR THOSE OVERWHELMED OR WITH A LIMITED BUDGET I. Survey your site to find pockets of remaining native plants. Clear around these plants first. By doing this you "release" these plants from their buckthorn competition. Protect them from being harmed during cutting and removal. Sometimes these natives are very,very small,the size of sticks;but they are worth protecting, because when they are freed,they bounce back with new growth. Find a local native plant expert to help you with identification. Use colored ribbon flagging to mark the special plants to protect. These remnants are the very important local gene pool(plants that are indigenous to your area). 2. Remove or kill female buckthorn first.This stops annual seed production in the area.Mark the female plants when ever fruit is visible,late summer through winter,for priority removal. 1 Protect quality wooded areas that are only partially infested first. FOR NEIGFIBORHOOD REMOVAL PROJECTS 4. Partner with conservation groups,your city,garden clubs,other neighborhood volunteers. 5. Search locally for potential grant funding,then write grant proposals. Ask local businesses and foundations for assistance. 6. Prioritize buckthorn removals to be in high-profile areas;for example,along bike paths,parkways, and in parks. 7. Publicize what you're doing: put up informational signs in the project area;distribute flyers to nearby residents;write an article for your local paper or association. 8. Stop to answer questions of all those who inquire while you are working. These methods sound like a lot of work,and frankly it is. The benefits of organizing a project are many. When I began to organize projects in my neighborhood,I met neighbors for the first time after living only a few doors away for many years. You will be proud of your work when you see how the natives respond to release. Helping to preserve a small piece of our diminishing native woodlands,savannas and wetlands is noble indeed. Good luck, See page 8 for references and where to go for more information. 7 • ti }, �+ �� J /�,¢►j, W • a $*" �. N p • A .,•,•:::,n,,,,-. .•. a rA'' ,"*-°,„�.g .J �:.R f- "e"•' -4114.,•, r 111l1f i��r ! � • a Z �K i/s f 1 ''' .. �. ...,,, >. R 1:1 all g` � r �, . r.t r Looking east at upland grassland West woods o::: north A Y: r •••';-;-,,,,'-i,':•::.'..•7,' * .. "L y' m i `►' @ r�` as '.-' :s r� '� a . t T - x d;�, �y 9f i ''..''.• ,•,, '(` '; *41:;..1'''',.,::;;;111,4'''.1 ,',> f ,.,::;; t r _ �•,,&1 „.,....1,..i. � ,,./,, ,: ,,yY c. `n s..i.;; Y .r ti �l!° N'.} ' (R^ �'' . # n, f;>^t n __,r ' ,,�, f!”' �w!s,-. +'<' "a� t r lr �r-,:,i�,4B�r f. "",,,:N: °. .rs..'' `i { jL • ',;� i!,i; ti ' 4 xx.4 ' ' � •3.1-04141k,":''',.-fi r: .�,l� ��f�da� �-,,,r1.-,2,!-.-'5.',.-t.,,,�+LN �� '(.%'}J V "r^ A .j � j FD i /b, l7y .� ',4i�,A^��,,A .sf; ,, :. / - 1_{,�� � rte` t it ����[fp! a .y ti s ,( e , tiIt' $a g�., o. + - F i i3� r pa's ' — s { q - . Cif ✓ !- $ / r 4 y_ —--- - -- ,,,:4-..'"3,"?.'''-4•_„c, - f- ,t tit f).•> .-e.,,, ._ 41- : .rte'.— - - •, , 'P�` ._.?� -v , _ _.• • Corner woods Past corner woods where buckthorn starts 1 Rx_y. ----/,..'.-- • ?' `� ' t 9 r ,D k S + ' M gz ' ,. 4 e� .;�,9k.� �'. ' � y�mo. •� � x'5L t"�b c.n •2^� C '* a- tr 4 1k,i &. /r1 1 di rIn ::.'14,,,,4; � r� 4:' '''` a t '� -- .:; ; :. : 1,,-.---' .."-21:: y--' .\- c t < .i -tis: 1 _ �:. ry epi :ro '4 .' ;!f 3 ..1,_ ,r..Pq*,,;'..4"— +."A • a .;:-:.''i.5",..944 '.-...------,.....:',. :b -- r -.;:.,•-'11--a, n..r... i ..A!!sG4n.^w"ay..r.Y. rt. u _,.- ,, Demolition debris in woods Northern prickly ash on east grassed plateau t f , i' +� .p;?m"tn" . raw" • \' N sr o- tax " R F,.'''''t...'; s�, K'ca -:-,'•y sr :. A'wW: A 1 • x'{ p ' Zy :tik.' &t- "..,•'-:'-'.:1:,' 1-,_- 7 w;al 2 44j v_ !��1 ! kh4 'w ,x �+ 91�;, ,�.. h� z x.,.y P .r ri � r • '•ms x� a � � _i ";! 9x", �.• k:4`... G.mr.� .r <' .__. tt .v= .. ...a _ "- American elm trees bylateau p East grassed plateau 1 I II I P I Yi<pp��yyy y4. I:IR 't Y - __ _ � • ` 5 4Ii:::'';III...,II.':'..I'.',.:I.','i-s;.1. g - e t A'�y, ae`z" u' rr'' "(• tfY^` "--FP. '�`t^:`,.:;` a te 'v.Yf '`; . .!t• East side of property looking east to orchard property 1 1 IllValli�' o ilk y i ...,,, . . . ,..„-- 4 III • \ ENTRY gg 1111111111.1 c‘......... M ,_ 1r FEE = 986.7 ENTRY FFE = 986. " . .,.1 i .,.. . ..,.;..i Fy m PROPOSE RETAINING WALL \ \ LL 2 ' W /'J^ COO C ^•^ d.. an M um uonly 2 nese fa.conn Anon.Values.fromW 0 rolarasanted toe an 36xH mnirtacninrs pa .Wc imwse or Inuapannnrc lab to....suppliea by lamp roma waxers - PROJECT NAME: SOLID STATE AREA LIGHTING FIXTURE TYPE: DSAP SERIES - LED 1 SPECIFICATIONS0 25' 635mm HOUSING Upper housing is heavy gauge cast aluminum (DSAP25) or 0.125" thick spun aluminum with reveal (DSAP1). Lower housing is 0.080" thick spun aluminum with integrated LED module seat. Lower housing is vented at top and bottom for } convective cooling of LED module. Top Driver chamber is t) sealed from LED Module chamber. Trulevel ball coupling 18.5" mount is welded to housing and facilitates quick leveling 470mm and installation. ' ‘I . VLED°OPTICS + Low copper A356 alloy (<.2%copper) cast aluminum housing. Integrated clear tempered glass lens sealed with a continuous silicone gasket protects emitters (LED's) and emitter Reflector-Prism optics,and seals the module from water intrusion and environmental contaminants. Module is sealed to meet an 4,481:�rtow- IP67 rating. Each emitter is optically controlled by a Reflector-Prism injection molded from H12 acrylic (3 types per module;one from 0°-50°;one from 50°-65°;one from 65°-72°). Each Reflector-Prism has indexing pins for aiming and is secured to an optical plate made of matte black anodized aluminum. DSAP25 The optical plate locates every Reflector-Prism over an emitter. Reflector-Prisms are secured to the optical plate with a UV curing PATENT PENDING adhesive.The Reflector-Prisms are arrayed to produce IES Type II, III, IV, and V-SQ distributions. The entire Optical Module is field rotatable in 90°increments. Both module and drivers are factory wired using water resistant, insulated cord. 7 LED DRIVER 20" // Drivers are UL and cUL recognized mounted on a single plate CO1 508mm and factory prewired with quick-disconnect plugs. Constant current driver is electronic and has a power factor of>0.90 and i a minimum operating temperature of-40°F. Drivers accept an input of 120-277V, 50/60Hz or 347-480V, 50/60Hz. (0 - 10V i dimmable driver is standard. Driver has a minimum of 3KV f 1 ',[ . internal surge protection. Luminaire supplied with 20KV surge 16.5" mm 1.,J I: protector for field accessible installation.) 419I1, LED EMITTERS ` i. High output LED's are utilized with drive currents ranging from 350mA to 1050mA. 70CRI Minimum. LED's are available in I standard Neutral White(4000K), or optional Cool White (5000K) or Warm White(3000K).Consult Factory for other LED options. AMBER LED's PCA(Phosphor Converted Amber) LED's utilize phosphors to _ 1 create color output similar to LPS lamps and have a slight - . output in the blue spectral bandwidth. TRA (True Amber) LED's utilize material that emits light in the amber spectral bandwidth only without the use of phosphors. FINISH DSAP1 Electrostatically applied TGIC Polyester Powder Coat on PATENT PENDING substrate prepared with 20 PSI power wash at 140°F.Four step iron phosphate pretreatment for protection and paint adhesion.400°F bake for maximum hardness and durability. Texture finish is standard. c el LIS MADE IN THE LISTED LISA 2018334 660 west Avenue a Palmed,CA 93551 U.S.ARCHITECTURAL U.S. Architectural Lighting Phone(661)233-2000 Fox(661)23120010 vnvw esan9 corn 11111L DSAP SERIES - LED SPECIFICATIONS MOUNTING STYLES VLED®MODULES 24" (610mm) 24" 610mm) / Nn eeeeei�eeeeee eees eee®aa tee£ aa 42'• ® ee.e® eo I ar' a eeee®e00es I (1067mm) fl 1067mm) OXPD 120 LED Module DSAP25 E.P,A,=1.23 T Available in: 3"I.D.— H 3"I.D.--I I--- 120,100,80&64 LED Module ARMS ARE HEAVY WALL EXTRUDED ALUMINUM CONSTRUCTION. FOR ADDITIONAL ARM OPTIONS SEE ARM SECTION OF USALTG.COM WEBSITE Allk 1 eOe1 •®e1 e®® ®ea eee eee Approximate Average Lumens-4000K71::;==5) e®®ee®®a (Lumens median of all distributions) ��®�®®�� eeeeeeee ®ee®e® e 350mA 525mA 700mA BY®®®®®.•; Watts Lumens HID Eq. Watts Lumens HID Eq. Watts Lumens HID Eq. ��' 48 53 5,843 100 7777 8,046 100- 13 lo,o7a 250 DSAP1 E.P.A.=0.77 80 LED Module Available in: 64 71 7,791 1�0- 102 10,728 175 138 12,402 315- 0,64&48 LED Module 80 87 9,164 I 5O- 130 12,493 200 173 15,539 45000. 100 110 11,055 2007755 160 15,295 350-5 - - - 400 120 129 13,265 250 192 18,354 400- - - - 450 Spec/Order Example:DSAP1/VLED-II/64LED-350mA/CW/208/XPD3-120/RAL-9003-T/DF SPEC / ORDERING INFORMATION MODEL OPTICS LED MODE I VOLTAGE MOUNTING FINISH OPTIONS MODEL OPTICS LED VOLTAGE MOUNTING FINISH OPTIONS VLED® #of LED's DRIVE CURRENT ARM MOUNT STANDARD IES DISTRIBUTION TYPE TEXTURED FINISH DSAP25 ❑ DSAP25 0 TYPE II gr,MM 0 120LED1 0 700mA ❑ 120 0 xi3DP ❑XPK( ❑BLACK ❑HOUSE SIDE SHIELDED VLED-II1 RAL-9005-T REFLECTOR PRISMS..HS-VLED ❑100LED 0 525mA ❑ DSAP1 0 TYPE III M 0 80LED ❑350mA ❑208 ❑1...... . .., ♦ ❑WHITE ❑PHOTO CELL+VOLTAGE VIED-III ❑64LED ❑240 RAL-9003-T (EXAMPLE:PC120V)..PC+V 0 TYPE IV COLOR ❑2180 H 0 TWIST LOCK VLED-IV 0 277 ❑GREY RECEPTACLE ONLY...TPR DSAP1 0 NW(4000K) ❑3-120 RAL-7004-T❑SOLED' ❑7-PIN TWIST LOCK 'STANDARD ❑347 RECEPTACLE ONLY..TPR7 ❑ TYPE V-S6) 0 DARK BRONZE VLED-VSQ.. 0 CW(5000K) ❑64LED' ❑WW(3000K) ❑480 0 4-90 RAL 8019-T ❑�120V..2776) SF 048LED ❑GREEN OTHER LED COLORS ❑DOUBLE FUSE CONSULT RAL-6005-T (208V., 240V) DF WALLMOUNT ❑HIGH-LOW DIMMING FOP AMBER2 ❑WM.. .... .. * HARDWIRED SWITCHING OR NONINTEGRATED MOTION ❑PHOSPHOR CONVERTED AMBER SENSOR HLSW PCA ❑TRUE AMBERS ❑(PROGRAMMED 50/100) TRA FOR SMOOTH FINISH MS-F211 NOTES: REPLACE SUFFIX-T'' REMOTE MOTION SENSOR 1'NOT AVAILABLE IN 700mA WITH SUFFIX-S" ❑ (EXAMPLE:RAL-9500-5 CONFIGURATOR MS•FC10 2-NARROW BAND AMBERS HAVE NO DEFINABLE ) CCT EQUIVALENT SEE USA-TG.COM FOR S . 3-AVAILABLE IN 350mA S 525mA DRIVE CURRENTS ONLY ADDITIONAL ARM STYLES ADO TSIONALCOLLORS 6honee(661)23-O,P Fox (561)233551 © U.S.ARCHITECTURAL U.S. Architectural Lighting Phone(661)Avenue 0,PlmOole,CA 3-2001 93551 WWWDSOR9com ® LIGHTING DSAP SERIES - LED LED / ELECTRICAL GUIDE 'r.., i -°'�'.d,re:.(� .`'e'''fil a.:Y� F�§`:INIT.IAih ,s'' ,. l�?m a .#-'. .��. ,',,s . � 1 * x ' 4Bi. , r9ili `{TC.'-' rr 7';.Rr r 600 .*' I rl ,Aarms` ,,,Ai[- r,I.,(9a Va 48 LED 48 VLED'Optical 5,664- 5,381 - 5,847- 60,000+ -20°F 55 120 0.45 Module-350mA 6,022 5,721 6,323 277 0.20 347 0.16 48 LED 48 VLED'Optical 7,799- 7,409- 8,189- 60,000+ -20°F 79 120 0.65 Module`-525mA 8,292 7,877 8,707 277 0.26 347 0.23 48 LED 48 VLED'Optical 9,765- 9,277- 10,253- 60,000+ -20°F 109 120 0.86 Module-700mA 10,382 9,863 10,901 277 0.38 347 0.30 64 LED 64 VLED'Optical 7,552- 7174- 7,930- 60,000+ -20°F 70 120 0.60 Module-350mA 8,030 7629 8,432 277 0.26 347 0.21 64 LED 64 VLED'Optical 10,399- 9,879- 10,919- 60,000+ -20°F 108 120 0.85 Module-525mA 11,057 10,504 11610 277 0.37 347 0.30 64 LED 64 VLED'Optical 12,111- 11,505- 12,717- 60,000+ -20°F 134 120 1.15 Module-700mA 12,693 12,058 13,328 277 0.50 347 0.40 80 LED 80 VLED'Optical 8,883- 8,439- 9,327- 60,000+ -20°F 85 120 0.73 Module-350mA 9,445 8,973 9,917 277 0.33 347 0.26 80 LED 80 VLED'Optical 12,110- 11,505- 12,716- 60,000+ -20°F 130 120 1.09 Module-525mA 12,876 12,232 13,520 277 0.47 347 0.38 80 LED 80 VLED'Optical 15,211 - 14,381 - 15,895- 60,000+ -20°F 167 120 1.45 Module-700mA 15,866 15,073 16,659 277 0.63 347 0.50 100 LED 120 VLED'Optical 10,812- 10,271- 11,353- 60,000+ -20°F 109 120 0.92 Module-350mA 11,297 10,732 11,862 277 0.40 347 0.32 100 LED 120 VLED'Optical 14,958- 14,210- 15,706- 60,000+ -20°F 160 120 1.34 Module-525mA 15,632 14,850 16,414 277 0.58 347 0.47 120 LED 120 VLED'Optical 12,973- 12,324- 13,622- 60,000+ -20°F 130 120 1.08 Module-350mA 13,557 12,879 14,235 277 0.47 347 0.38 120 LED 120 VLED'Optical 17,950- 17,053- 18,848- 60,000+ -20'F 192 120 1.60 Module-525mA 18,758 17,820 19,696 277 0.70 347 0.56 NOTES: 1.Max Input Amps is the highest of starting,operating,or open circuit currents 2.Lumen values for LED Modules vary according to the distribution type 3.System Watts includes the source watts and all driver components. 4.Fuse value should be sufficient to protect all wiring components.For electronic driver and LED component protection,use 10KV-20KV surge suppressors. 5.L70(9K)-TM-21 bx rule applied WARNING:All fixtures must be installed in accordance with local codes or the National Electrical Code.Failure to do so may result in serious personal injury. 660 wee Avenue O,Palmdale,cA 93551 U.S. Architectural Lighting Phane(667)233-2000 Fon(667)233-2W7 tFili U.S.ARCHITECTURAL www.usofg.com IIIII LIGHTING CONCEPT MONUMENT PLAN p Stone Veneer(typ.) 111 z• Stainless Steel Letters t (VNhite) I Co Sigrtenn(32St seml precast Concrete or Indiana Limestone Cap s trI!� - - ., _ EIS GER :-r��L n• tj MEADOWS " t- 7."':- Limestone Slab/ 11 - 8 ft fa Boulder Outcroppings byQTnT •p.a T ��•hh ,I• 4 It. ,,�, 4 , 'THIS GRAPHIC'S Afff,[*STSRENDITION FORIlUt1S'ERATNE PURPOSES ONLY'AND ISSURJEC2TOCFANGF. '_: :.:. `LAKE WErT412019 EISINGER MEADOWS ■UFIFIIPNFIT,(IC ORONO,MN 0' 2' 4' 6' WENCK File #B5503-0003 March 29, 2019 Response Action Plan and Construction Contingency Plan Eisinger Meadows 3245 Wayzata Boulevard W5. Orono, Minnesota 55356 MPCA Project No. VP11342 5t � . 111j19 I la tti7 ill!I 1 i !i i! u . ��! �li�, -1 '* - i± 1 i1i 111 �� + J I I � 1i�1+ . illi + . . .�#. ■i 1 a 'i 1 1! Prepared for: 14525 Highway 7 La kewest, LLC Suite 265 Minnetonka, MN 55345 V V- Prepared by: WENCK Associates, Inc. WENCK MaplePP! lain, MN 55359nter Responsive partner. Phone: 763-479-4200 Fax: 763-479-4242 Exceptional outcomes. Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1-1 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 2-1 2.1 Current Use of Adjoining Properties 2-1 2.2 Physical Setting 2-2 2.2.1 Topography 2-2 2.2.2 Geology 2-2 2.2.3 Hydrogeology 2-2 3.0 PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTS 3-1 3.1 Phase II Environmental Site Assessment (esa), Howard Eisinger Property, 3245 West Wayzata Boulevard, Orono, MN. GME Consultants, Inc., April 13, 1999.3-1 3.2 Drilling Investigation Report, Minnesota Department of Transportation (mndot), State Trunk Highway 12, Long Lake, MN. EnecoTech Midwest, Inc. October 9, 2002 3-1 3.3 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Haugo Geotechnical Services, LLC, October 2014 3-2 3.4 Soil borings Performed By Haugo Geotechncial Services, LLC and Test Pits by Lake West Excavating, LLC, 2014/2015 3-3 3.5 Test Pit Sampling Data Report, Wenck Associates, Inc., June 2015 3-4 3.6 Remedial Investigation Report, WEnck Associates, Inc., March 2019 3-5 3.6.1 Soil Discussion 3-5 3.6.2 Groundwater Discussion 3-6 3.6.3 Soil Vapor Discussion 3-6 4.0 RESPONSE ACTION PLAN 4-1 4.1 Environmental Conditions to be Addressed (Site Conceptual Model) 4-1 4.1.1 Soil-Human Health Pathway 4-1 4.1.2 Soil Leaching Pathway 4-1 4.1.3 Vapor Intrusion Pathway 4-1 4.1.4 Groundwater Pathway 4-1 4.2 Proposed Development 4-2 4.3 General Project Tasks 4-2 4.4 Response Action Objectives 4-3 4.5 Action Levels 4-3 4.5.1 Proposed Building Footprint Areas 4-3 4.5.2 Utility Corridors 4-4 4.5.3 Green Space 4-4 4.5.4 Parking, Driveways and Sidewalks 4-4 4.6 Sampling And Analytical Testing 4-4 4.7 Vapor Mitigation 4-5 5.0 CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY PLAN 5-1 5.1 General 5-1 5.2 Project Organization 5-1 5.2.1 Current Property Owner and Planned Developer - Lakewest, LLC 5-1 5.2.2 Owner's Environmental Consultant - Wenck Associates, Inc. 5-2 March 2019 i �ISS�WENCK \\woodbury-dc1\Woodbury\Technical\5503 Lake West\03-RAP\Eisinger Meadows RAP 032919.docx Table of Contents (Cont.) 5.2.3 Construction Contractor Information — TBD 5-2 5.2.4 Regulatory Agency — Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 5-2 5.3 Site Control 5-2 5.4 Recognition of Potential Waste And/Or Contaminated Soils 5-3 5.5 Site Hazard Evaluation Activities 5-3 5.5.1 Chemical Vapor Hazards 5-3 5.5.2 Particulate Hazards 5-3 5.6 Waste Evaluation 5-3 5.6.1 Demolition Debris 5-4 5.6.2 Refuse 5-4 5.6.3 Free Product 5-4 5.6.4 Underground Storage Tanks 5-4 5.6.5 Barreled Wastes 5-5 5.6.6 Electrical Transformers 5-5 5.6.7 Creosote Timbers 5-5 5.6.8 Batteries 5-5 5.6.9 Oil Filters 5-5 5.6.10 Waste Tires 5-5 5.6.11 Stained Soils or Soils Exhibiting Strong or Unusual Odors 5-6 5.7 Field Screening and Sampling Of Contaminated Soil 5-6 5.7.1 Headspace Screening Procedure 5-6 5.7.2 Soil Segregation and Sampling 5-7 5.8 General Soil Sampling Procedures 5-7 5.8.1 Stockpile Sampling Procedures 5-8 5.8.2 Excavation Sampling 5-8 5.8.3 Typical Laboratory Methodologies 5-9 5.9 Disposition Requirements 5-9 5.10 General Field Documentation Procedures 5-9 5.11 Excavation Backfill Material 5-10 6.0 IMPLEMENTATION REPORTING 6-1 7.0 REFERENCES 7-1 8.0 STANDARD OF CARE AND SIGNATURES 8-1 FIGURES Figure 1: Site Location Map Figure 2: Site Detail Map Figure 3: Boring Locations Map and Extent of Landfill and Fill Soils Figure 4: Proposed Extent of Excavation TABLES 1 Soil Analytical Summary 2 Soil Vapor Analytical Results Summary 3 Groundwater Analytical Results Summary Mii -vAy WENCK March 2019 Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. \\woodbury-dcl\Woodbury\Technical\5503 Lake West\03-RAP\Eisinger Meadows RAP 032919.docx Table of Contents (Cont. ) APPENDICES Appendix A: Remedial Investigation Report (Wenck, March 2019) Appendix B: Planned Development Drawings (Ryan Engineering, March 2019) Appendix C: Architectural Plans (Collage Architects, March 2019) March 2019 iii ^ WENCK Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. \\woodbury-dcl\Woodbury\Technical\5503 Lake West\03-RAP\Eisinger Meadows RAP 032919.docx 1 .0 Introduction Wenck Associates, Inc. (Wenck) was authorized by Lakewest, LLC (Lakewest) to prepare this Response Action Plan (RAP) and Construction Contingency Plan (CCP) for the property located at 3245 Wayzata Boulevard West, Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota (the Site). This document presents a RAP and CCP for the proposed redevelopment known as the Eisinger Meadows and Eisinger Flats. The proposed redevelopment is located on a documented closed landfill and construction is scheduled to commence in summer 2019. The project includes the construction of 27 single-family villas along Wayzata Boulevard (Eisinger Flats) and two multi-family buildings on the south side of the Site (Eisigner Meadows). The one-story villas are approximately 2,100 square feet in size with a walk-out basement. The multi-family buildings will each be three stories with one level of underground parking. The proposed buildings are approximately 47,286 (west) and 41,726 square feet (east) in size. Surface parking will be available between the two multi-family buildings and will connect to Wayzata Boulevard to the north of the Site. Other necessary improvements include associated utility infrastructure, stormwater infiltration basins and recreational areas. The purpose of the RAP/CCP is to provide a written protocol for the implementation of Response Actions at the Site. The primary goal is to provide guidance to Site personnel to manage impacted soil and waste that will be encountered during construction activities. This document also describes the process for addressing any other unanticipated wastes that might be encountered as part of construction. The RAP/CCP will be used as a guide to determine whether impacted soil: 1) can be reused on-Site as appropriate backfill, 2) requires off-site management at a permitted facility, or 3) can be reused as unregulated fill at another location. In addition, this document will provide field decision-making guidance to the Environmental Professional and other Site personnel in the event that unanticipated contamination (petroleum or non-petroleum related) is encountered during implementation of the proposed Site redevelopment activities. A copy of the RAP/CCP will be kept on-Site in the project field superintendent's office, in order to be readily available during construction activities. It should be noted that this RAP/CCP is intended to be used for evaluating the environmental characteristics of soil and does not determine if the soils can be re-used on- Site based on geotechnical assessment properties. This RAP/CCP has been prepared for the exclusive use of Lakewest and the associated contractors working at its direction and having a specific, contractual relationship with La kewest. W WENCK March 2019 1-1 Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. \\woodbury-dcl\Woodbury\Technical\5503 Lake West\03-RAP\Eisinger Meadows RAP 032919.docx 2.0 Site Description The Site is located in a rural area in Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Address: 3245 Wayzata Boulevard West City: Orono Site County: Hennepin State: Minnesota Address/Location Township: Range: Section: 118 North 23 West 32 Size: 29 acres Property Property Identification Numbers: Information 32-118-23-14-0001; 32-118-23-14-0002 Improvements The Site consists of two parcels. The smaller of the two parcels (3.2 acres) is occupied by a single-family home and a garage_ Current Use: The Site is currently vacant with one single family homestead located on the northeast portion of the site. The homestead has not been occupied for several years. Use of the Property Past Use: Approximately 12-acres of parcel 32-118-23-14-0002 was used as a sanitary landfill between 1958 and 1972 with additional fill material placed on top through 1993. The remaining acreage is natural wetland and wood land. Current Ownership & Operation: Ownership and Operation of the The Site is currently owned by Lakewest, LLC. Property The Site location is depicted in Figure 1. A Site Detail Map showing the Site boundaries is provided in Figure 2. 2.1 CURRENT USE OF ADJOINING PROPERTIES The following land uses were noted on adjoining properties: Direction Description North Unimproved land, single-family residence and Lake Classen beyond Wayzata Boulevard West South T.H. 12 and unimproved land East Unimproved Land West Unimproved Land March 2019 2-1 ' 9 WENCK Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. \\woodbury-dc1\Woodbury\Technical\5503 Lake West\03-RAP\Eisinger Meadows RAP 032919.docx 2.2 PHYSICAL SETTING 2.2.1 Topography The topography of the Site is generally level and slopes slightly from northeast to southwest. The northern portion of the Site along Wayzata Boulevard has an elevation of approximately 1,010± feet above Mean Sea Level (MSL). The elevation decreases to the south towards the wetland to an elevation of 975± feet above MSL. The elevation decreases from 1,010 feet above MSL to the west towards the landfill area to an elevation of approximately 995± feet above MSL. The topography of the landfill area slopes slightly to the south-southwest to an elevation of approximately 985± feet. The west and east sides of the landfill drop steeply to an approximate elevation of 975 feet above MSL. Historic filling on the west side of the Site is evident. 2.2.2 Geology According to the Haugo Geotechnical Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Haugo, 2014), the surficial geology at the Site is characterized by two distinct surficial geological groups which include loamy till and post glacial organic deposits (swamps or wetlands). Bedrock in the vicinity of the Site consists of the Jordan Sandstone Formation which is comprised of quartzose sandstone. The depth to bedrock is approximately 250 to 300 feet below the ground surface (Haugo, 2014). 2.23 Hydrogeology The general direction of regional groundwater flow in the area of the Site is noted to the south-southeast toward the Minnesota and Mississippi River systems (Haugo, 2014). Groundwater Local conditions may vary due to surface water features, perched groundwater conditions or artificially created drainage systems. The Site's surficial groundwater table is at an elevation of approximately 960 feet above MSL corresponding to a depth of approximately 25 feet below grade (Haugo, 2014). v^'WENCK March 2019 2-2 Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. \\woodbury-dcl\Woodbury\Technical\5503 Lake West\03-RAP\Eisinger Meadows RAP 032919.docx 3. 0 Previous Environmental Reports 3.1 PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT (ESA), HOWARD EISINGER PROPERTY, 3245 WEST WAYZATA BOULEVARD, ORONO, MN. GME CONSULTANTS, INC., APRIL 13, 1999. The purpose of this Phase II ESA was to investigate for the possible presence of subsurface impacts related to the former landfill and at the heating oil tank near the house at the Howard Eisinger property. Twelve soil borings were conducted at the Site and soil and groundwater samples were collected for laboratory analyses. A mobile laboratory was used to analyze select soil and groundwater samples for volatile organic compounds (VOCs), gasoline range organics (GRO), and diesel range organics (DRO). One soil and one groundwater sample from each boring was collected and analyzed for Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) metals, polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and pesticides. Based on the preliminary results from the mobile lab, four groundwater and four soil samples were submitted to the fixed laboratory for analysis. During our review of the Phase II ESA report, it was noted that Table 2 — Soil Analytical Results was missing from the report. Based on the investigation results in the narrative of the report, the landfilled waste is covered with approximately 1 to 10 feet of fill material. The landfilled waste ranges from 4 to 12 feet in thickness. Debris encountered includes newspaper, wire, plastic, bags, wood, foam rubber, brick, and metal pieces. Organic deposits and blue/gray native clays were encountered below the refuse material. Some of the refuse material was located below the unconfined groundwater table. Field readings using a flame-ionization detector (FID) showed high levels of organic vapors likely caused by both contaminate vapors and decaying organic matter. Organic soils were found within the area of refuse and may have been used as daily cover during landfill operations. Concentrations of lead, cadmium, tetrachloroethane (PCE), benzoanthracene, b- benzoflouroanthene, 1,2-dichloroethene, 1,4-dichlorobenzene, and total PCBs were above found to be above the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's (MPCAs) Tier I Soil Leaching Values (SLVs). Lead and PCBs were above the MPCA's Residential Soil Reference Values (SRVs). The groundwater analyses indicated detections of petroleum constituents at relatively low concentrations. Tetrachloroethylene, PCBs, and some benzene related parameters were detected at concentrations above HRLs. Elevated RCRA metal concentrations were also found in the collected groundwater samples. The analytical reports and analytical summary table were omitted from the GME Phase II ESA Report. A map showing the soil boring locations is included as Figure 3. 12 DRILLING INVESTIGATION REPORT, MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (MNDOT), STATE TRUNK HIGHWAY 12, LONG LAKE, MN. ENECOTECH MIDWEST, INC. OCTOBER 9, 2002. In 2000 and 2001, EnecoTech drilled on the southern edge of the Site to investigate potential impacts to soil and groundwater within the construction limits of the realignment of Trunk Highway (TH) 12 in Long Lake, Minnesota. TH 12 adjoins the Site to the south. Five borings SB-1 thru SB-4 were drilled on the southern portion of the Eisinger Property and six March 2019 3-1 WENCK Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. \\woodbury-dc1\Woodbury\Technical\5503 Lake West\03-RAP\Eisinger Meadows RAP 032919.docx borings SB-5 thru SB-11 were drilled at and within the construction limits. For the purposes of this Work Plan, we have used data from soil borings SB-1 thru SB-4. Soil boring logs for borings SB-1 thru SB-4 showed organic-rich clay (fill) to depths ranging between 12- and 18-feet below ground surface (bgs). Debris such as scrap metal, glass, wood, and plastic were observed within the fill material. The fill and debris layers were underlain by peat to a depth of at least 20 feet bg. Groundwater was encountered at approximately 12 feet bgs. One to four soil samples were collected from each boring and analyzed for VOCs, GRO, DRO, RCRA metals, PCBs, semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs), PAHs, and pesticides. Benzene, ethylbenzene, toluene and total xylenes (BTEX) were detected above laboratory method detection limits in two samples from boring SB-3. Benzene (SB-3 (18 to 20') was the only constituent that exceeded its applicable MPCA SRV or SLV. Concentrations of GRO were detected above laboratory method detection limits in soil samples SB-3 and SB-4. DRO concentrations were detected above laboratory method detection limits in soil samples collected from soil borings SB-1 thru SB-4. Maximum concentrations were detected in boring SB-3. Several RCRA metals were detected at concentrations exceeding respective SRVs and SLVs. VOCs were detected in each of the soil samples collected. Soil samples collected from borings SB-3 and SB-4 had at least one VOC above its SRV and/or SLV. PCBs were detected in borings SB-1 thru SB-4. The only soil sample to reveal total PCBs above the MPCA SLV and SRV of 8 mg/kg was sample SB-2. SVOCs and/or PAH concentrations were detected above the laboratory detection limits in borings SB-1 thru SB-4. Soil samples from SB-2, SB-3, and SB-4 showed PAH concentration above MPCA SLVs and SRVs. Pesticides were not detected in any of the analyzed soil samples. Groundwater samples showed detectable levels of GRO and DRO in borings SB-1 through SB-4. No VOCs were reported above applicable Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Health Risk Limits (HRLs), the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) Maximum Contaminant levels (MCLS) and MDH Health-Based Values (HBVs). There were no metal or SVOC concentrations above applicable drinking water standards in borings SB-1 thru SB-4. Groundwater samples were also analyzed for PCBs, pesticides, and dioxin. None of these constituents were detected in the collected groundwater samples. A map showing the soil boring locations from this investigation are included in on Figure 3. 3.3 PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT, HAUGO GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES, LLC, OCTOBER 2014 A Phase I ESA was completed by Haugo Geotechnical Services, LLC, (Haugo) dated October 9, 2014 (Haugo, 2014). During the preparation of the Phase I ESA, Haugo learned the Site was listed in the EDR Radius Map Report for the following databases: Site Remediation Section (SRS), Minnesota List of Sites and Open Landfill Inventory (MN LS), State Institutional Control database (INST CONTROL), Spills database (SPILLS), and Voluntary Investigation and Cleanup Program (MPCA VIC). A review of records reasonably obtainable for the Site indicated that about 12-acres of the Site was operated as a sanitary landfill between 1958 to 1972 with additional fill placed on top of the waste through 1993. 9 WENCK March 2019 3-2 Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. \\woodbury-dcl\Woodbury\Technical\5503 Lake West\03-RAP\Eisinger Meadows RAP 032919.docx According to the Haugo Phase I ESA, specific types and quantities of wastes buried within the landfill are unknown. During the 2014 site visit, a variety of materials were noted near the surface, including household trash, metal, concrete, asphalt, wood, bricks, paper, and car parts. It was noted in the EDR Radius Map Report that eight barrels of an unknown liquid were abandoned on the Site in 1992. It was reported that six of the barrels had spilled onto the ground. Documents provided during the Phase I ESA indicated land-use restrictions on the Site. A Conditional Use Permit dated May 7, 1987 by the City of Orono stated that no buildings can be constructed within the landfill area. The past use of the Site as a sanitary landfill was considered a Historical Recognized Environmental Condition (HREC) in the Phase I ESA report. 3.4 SOIL BORINGS PERFORMED BY HAUGO GEOTECHNCIAL SERVICES, LLC AND TEST PITS BY LAKE WEST EXCAVATING, LLC, 2014/2015 In August 2014, Haugo installed eight soil borings at the Site. Three soil borings SB-1 thru SB-3 were drilled on the east parcel and the remaining five were drilled near the landfill area. Debris was encountered in soil borings SB-6 and SB-7: Below presents a summary of Haugo's findings: SB-6: Sandy lean clay (Fill) to seven feet below grade (bg). Silty sand and sandy lean clay with pieces of glass, plastic, wood, and metal were encountered from 7 to 14 feet bgs. The debris was underlain by sandy lean clay to 31 feet bg. SB-7: Sandy lean clay (Fill) to approximately 1.5 feet. Silty sand (Fill) encountered to 12 feet bg. Concrete pieces noted at 10 feet. Sandy lean clay encountered to the end of the boring at 31 feet. Pieces of plastic and glass encountered from 12 to 15 feet below grade. In September and October 2015, Haugo installed 29 additional borings at the Site in an attempt to define the northern and northeastern limits of the landfill (borings SB-1 through SB-29). Based on the 29 soil boring logs provided to Wenck by Lakewest, soil borings SB-4, SB-7, SB-16, SB-19, SB-20, SB-21, SB-22, SB-23, and SB-27 had encountered debris. Locations of the soil borings are included on Figure 3. Below presents a re summary of the findings in the borings that encountered waste: SB-4: Lean clay (Fill) in upper four feet. Sandy clay with metal, glass, and wood from four to nine feet below grade (bg). Debris layer underlain by sandy lean clay to 21 feet bg. SB-7: Sandy lean clay (Fill) to 19 feet bgs. Pieces of concrete encountered at 15 feet, creosote-like odors also encountered at 15 feet bg. Sandy lean clay from 19 to 26 feet bg. SB-16: Silty sand (Fill) to four feet bg. Organic silt with wood and roots to 16 feet bg. Organic silt underlain by sandy lean clay to 21 feet bg. SB-19: Clayey silty sand (Fill) to four feet bg. Silty sand to 14 feet, concrete and wood encountered at 10 feet. Organic silt encountered at 14 to 19 feet bg. Sandy silt from 19 to 21 feet. March 2019 3-3 WENCK Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. \\woodbury-dc1\Woodbury\Technical\5503 Lake West\03-RAP\Eisinger Meadows RAP 032919.docx SB-20: Silty sand and sandy lean clay (Fill) to 21 feet. Wire encountered at 10 feet, carpet encountered at 15 feet. SB-21: Silty sand encountered in upper foot. Sandy lean clay encountered between one- and four-feet bg. Silty sand found between four and 19 feet with glass and plastic at 10 feet. Sandy lean clay encountered from 19 to 21 feet bg. SB-22: Sandy lean clay (Fill) encountered in upper four feet. Silty sand layer between four and nine feet. Poorly graded sand to 14 feet with concrete, brick, and gravel. Silty sand with glass and plastic from 14 to 19 feet bg. Sandy lean clay encountered to 21 feet. SB-23: Sandy lean clay (Fill) encountered to nine feet bg. Silty sand with bituminous and concrete pieces to 19 feet. Sandy lean clay encountered to 21 feet. In June 2015, Lakewest Excavating conducted 48 test pits on the property to evaluate the cover material and waste thicknesses. Visual observance of the test pits revealed a sandy clay cover ranging in thickness from approximately 5 to 15 feet over waste. The test pits were not logged during excavation. The test pits were located within the known boundaries of the landfill. Locations of the test pits are included on Figure 3. The figure also includes the test pit surface elevation and bottom elevation. 3.5 TEST PIT SAMPLING DATA REPORT, WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC., JUNE 2015 In 2015, Wenck was contracted by Lakewest to conduct waste evaluation and soil sampling activities at the Site. Lake West Excavating, LLC had already excavated approximately 48 test pits in the area of the former landfill. Wenck selected four test pits across the site to be sampled. The soil samples were collected within the waste layer and analyzed for RCRA metals, VOCs, PAHs, PCBs, and DRO. Each of the 48 test pits showed evidence of landfilled material consisting of municipal solid waste construction demolition waste. As mentioned in Section 3.2, the waste material was capped by approximately 5 to 15 feet of sandy clay fill in all of the test pits. Wenck compared the analytical data results to the MPCA's Residential SRVs. In general, the test pit soil sample data showed concentrations of arsenic and lead above Residential SRVs. The Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) for lead concentrations showed a non-hazardous characteristic. In the VOC analysis, methylene chloride was detected above laboratory detection limits in all four soil samples. However, the concentrations were below Residential SRVs. Methylene chloride was detected above the Tier I Soil Leaching Value (SLV) of 0.017 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) in three of the four collected samples. Methylene chloride is likely a laboratory contaminate in this case. Low levels of PAHs were detected in two of the four test pit samples. No individual PAHs were identified above their respective SRVs or SLVs. Total PCBs were detected in two test pit soil samples. Total reported PCBs were identified above the MPCA SLV of 0.13 mg/kg in sample TP-2 (6') and above the Residential SRV of 8 mg/kg in sample TP-3 (5'). Low levels of DRO were detected in all four soil samples, however, the concentrations were below the MPCA's unregulated soil reuse guidance concentration of 100 mg/kg. v^VWENCK March 2019 3-4 Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. \\woodbury-dcl\Woodbury\Technical\5503 Lake West\03-RAP\Eisinger Meadows RAP 032919.docx 3.6 REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION REPORT, WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC., MARCH 2019 In February 2019, Wenck conducted a Remedial Investigation (RI) at the Site. The RI activities followed the procedures and scope of work outlined in the revised Work Plan dated February 2019. Wenck conducted the RI activities under an MPCA-approved revised Work Plan. The MPCA approved the revised Work Plan, with comments, via email on February 20, 2019. The purpose of the RI was to define the nature and extent of previously-identified impacts at the Site and to collect additional soil, groundwater and soil vapor data based on the proposed redevelopment at the Site. At the completion of the RI activities Wenck prepared a Remedial Investigation (RI) Report for submittal to the MPCA for review and approval. A brief summary of the RI findings is provided in the following sections. 3.6.1 Soil Discussion Based on the review of previous investigation information and the information collected during Wenck's MONTH 208 or 2019 RI activities the following evaluation os made of the landfill on Site: A The landfill cap consists of a sandy clay material. A The cap varies from approximately 5 to 13 feet in thickness. A The average thickness of the landfill cap is estimated to be approximately 10 feet. A The bottom of the waste layer was noted to extend to depths of between 18 to 28 feet bgs. A The nature of the waste includes sandy clay, organic clay, peat and pieces of wood, brick, concrete, metal, plastic, fabric and glass. A Underlying the waste layer is native peat and sandy clay material. During Wenck's RI activities, field screening using a photo-ionization detector (PID) did not reveal elevated headspace readings above 10 parts per million (ppm), except in boring B-7 at 5-10 feet (15.8 ppm) and 15-20 feet (22.7 ppm). Boring B-7 is located within a proposed greenspace area in the southeast quadrant of the landfill. Soil sampling revealed the presences of various petroleum-related VOCs within the waste layer in borings B-2, B-3, B-5 and B-7. The compound 1,4-Dichlorobenzene was detected over the MPCA SLV in borings B-3, B-5 and B-7 and 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene was detected over the MPCA SLV in boring B-5. DRO was detected over 100 mg/kg in seven soil samples collected within the waste layer. GRO was detected below 100 mg/kg in all of the collected soil samples. Total PCBs were detected above the MPCA SLV in borings B-3, B-4, B-5 and B-7 within the waste layer. PAHs were detected above Residential SRVs in boring B-7, located within the proposed greenspace area. Various RCRA metals were detected in the collected soil samples. Lead was detected above the Residential SRV in borings B-7, B-8 and B-9 within the waste layer and mercury was detected above the Residential SRV in borings B-5 and B- 7 within the waste layer. TCLP lead and chromium were analyzed based on the total results and were detected below their respective hazardous waste limits. With the soil detections of petroleum-related VOCs and PCBs above the MPCA SLV; PAHs, lead and mercury above the Residential SRVs; and the detection of DRO in the waste W'WENCK March 2019 3-5 Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. \\woodbury-dc1\Woodbury\Technical\5503 Lake West\03-RAP\Eisinger Meadows RAP 032919.docx material over 100 mg/kg, Wenck made the recommendation that the future redevelopment of the Site and soil management should be conducted under an approved MPCA RAP. 3.6.2 Groundwater Discussion Groundwater analytical results from temporary wells indicate the presence low-level VOCs in borings B-2 and B-3. Benzene was slightly above the HRL in boring B-3. DRO ranged from 175 to 581 micrograms per liter (ug/L) in borings B-3, B-4 and B-5. PAH constituents were detected in boring B-3 with benzo(a)pyrene above the established drinking water standards. GRO concentrations were not detected in the collected groundwater samples and dissolved metal concentrations were low and generally within the range typically considered background. Groundwater was encountered at approximately 13-15 feet bgs within the limits of the landfill and 18 to 21 feet bgs along the northeast edge of the landfill. 3.6.3 Soil Vapor Discussion VOC compound 1,3-Butadine was detected above 33x the Residential ISV in 8 of 15 soil vapor samples collected within the waste layer at the Site. Benzene was detected at 33x the Residential ISV in sample SV-15. Methane levels were above LEL of 5% in soil vapor samples SV-9 and SV-12 and hydrogen sulfide was below 20 ppm in all of the collected samples. Based on the historical use of the Site as a landfill, it is plausible that 1,3-butadine is present based on the decomposition of waste material, however, sample SV-2 had the highest concentration of 1,3-butadiene and is located approximately 100 feet northeast of the landfill. Based on widespread sources some of which are anthropogenic and other possibly naturally-occurring there appears to be naturally occurring 1,3-butadiene at the Site. Soil vapor should be addressed under an approved MPCA RAP for the proposed redevelopment activities at the Site. v^SWENCK March 2019 3-6 Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. \\woodbury-dc1\Woodbury\Technical\5503 Lake West\03-RAP\Eisinger Meadows RAP 032919.docx 4.0 Response Action Plan 4.1 ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS TO BE ADDRESSED (SITE CONCEPTUAL MODEL) 4.1.1 Soil-Human Health Pathway Based on the analytical results from the test pits and remedial investigation work at the Site, Response Actions are necessary to address management of the documented waste and soils impacted with PCBs, PAHs, arsenic, lead, mercury and petroleum at the Site. Identified impacts are primarily related to the buried waste within the closed landfill area. At-grade there is a sandy clay cap that varies in thickness from 5 to 13 feet bg. The average thickness of the cap is estimated to be approximately 10 feet. Within the waste layer is debris containing glass, wood, plastic, metal, brick, concrete, rubber and fabric. The waste extends 18 to 28 feet bg. The waste is mixed with sandy clay, organic clay and peat soils. Below the waste is native peat and sandy clay soils. Elevated concentrations of PCBs, PAHs, arsenic, lead and mercury were found in soil within the waste layer above Residential SRVs. DRO was detected in the waste layer above 100 mg/kg in 7 of 11 soil samples. Field screening did not reveal elevated headspace readings above 10 ppm, except in soil boring B-7 within the waste layer. Headspace readings were recorded at 15.8 and 22.7 ppm. 4.1.2 Soil Leaching Pathway Based on the previous environmental investigations, Response Actions (Ras) are necessary to address the soil leaching potential at the Site. Within the waste layer, VOCs such as 1,4- dichlorobenzene and 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene were detected over their respective MPCA SLVs. Metals such as arsenic, cadmium and silver were detected over their respective MPCA SLVs in the test pit soil samples collected within the waste layer. In addition, total PCBs were detected above the MPCA SLV within the south half of the landfill. 4.13 Vapor Intrusion Pathway Soil vapor testing identified the presence of 1,3-butadine and benzene above 33x the Residential ISVs. Methane was elevated above the LEL of 5% in two soil vapor samples collected within the landfill area. As noted above, headspace readings were below 10 ppm in the screened soil samples, except at location B-7, where headspace readings were between 10 and 20 ppm. 4.1.4 Groundwater Pathway Groundwater analytical results from the temporary wells show benzene and benzo(a)pyrene above the established MDH HRLs in boring B-3. The planned Site development is not likely to encounter perched groundwater conditions by excavation. At this time, dewatering is not anticipated. If dewatering becomes necessary, March 2019 4-1 ^ WENCK Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. \\woodbury-dcl\Woodbury\Technical\5503 Lake West\03-RAP\Eisinger Meadows RAP 032919.docx subsequent groundwater sampling may be necessary to characterize the water prior to disposal under an approved permit. 4.2 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Lakewest will redevelop the Site by constructing 27 single-family villas along Wayzata Boulevard and two multi-family buildings on the south side of the Site. The single-family villas will be one-story with a walk-out basement and attached two or three stall garage. The multi-family buildings will be three stories with one level of underground parking. The buildings are approximately 47,286 (west) and 41,726 square feet (east). Surface parking will be available between the two multi-family buildings and will connect to Wayzata Boulevard along the north side of the Site. Entrance ramps to the underground parking are located on the north ends of the multi-family buildings. Recreation areas are proposed on the far southern portion of the Site near TH 12, along the west side of the entrance driveway on the north side of the Site and between the villas and the east multi-family building. Two infiltration basins are proposed west of the entrance driveway and north of the west multi-family building. Appendix B includes the civil plans prepared by Ryan Engineering and Appendix C includes the architectural plans by Collage Architects. Other necessary improvements include associated utility infrastructure. The proposed project is planned to be built in 2019. Below are proposed elevations for key points at the Site: A Finished floor elevation of the underground parking garage is 976 feet above MSL A Groundwater elevation is estimated at 969 to 973 feet above MSL based on boring logs and the flood elevation of 973 feet above MSL at upgradient Lake Clausen A The estimated elevation of the adjoining wetland boundary is 975 feet above MSL 4.3 GENERAL PROJECT TASKS This RAP presents the procedures for implementing any necessary soil, groundwater or soil vapor Response Actions with respect to the known impacts during preparation of the Site for redevelopment. Upon MPCA approval of the RAP/CCP, the RAs will consist of the following activities: 1) Prepare and submittal of a Special Waste Profile for the waste and impacted soils that will be encountered as part of excavation for the building, footings, utilities or other Site features. 2) Evaluate if the waste can effectively be separated from impacted soils by means of a mechanical screen. 3) Excavate and stockpile the landfill cap soils to be reused on-Site. 4) The contractor will demolish structures and demolish/re-locate surface pavements, landscaping and possibly relocate underground structures that are part of the existing single-family residence along Wayzata Boulevard. 5) Upon approval of the Special Waste Profile for Disposal, and under Wenck's direction, the contractor will proceed to excavate, load, haul and dispose the non-hazardous materials exceeding Site screening criteria, as necessary, for impacted soils that are unsuitable for on-Site re-use. The excavated material will be transported under March 2019 4-2 A WENCK Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. \\woodbury-dcl\Woodbury\Technical\5503 Lake West\03-RAP\Eisinger Meadows RAP 032919.docx manifest directly to an MPCA-permitted landfill facility. Depending on the disposal facility selected and the nature of the material, the material may be used for daily cover or disposed directly in a landfill. This decision will be based on the facility's permit, and may also be subject to local approvals. 6) Limited sidewall and excavation bottom sampling will be conducted to document soil conditions of soil to be left in place. If previously unknown areas of environmental impacts are discovered during site construction, laboratory confirmation sampling will be performed to document conditions as outlined in Section 5. 7) The excavation will be restored as necessary with geotechnically suitable fill from on- site unregulated fill soils to accommodate the proposed development. If it is necessary to import soil to meet geotechnical criteria, the material source and character will be documented to confirm the soil meets environmental criteria for the Site. 4.4 RESPONSE ACTION OBJECTIVES The threshold objectives of the proposed RAs are to provide protection of public health, welfare and the environment through remediation of the soil beneath the Site, and satisfaction of the development design criteria for the planned residential development. The proposed RAs call for excavation, potential screening of waste, profiling and off-site disposal of impacted media with contaminant impacts exceeding the MPCA soil reuse criteria, MPCA Residential SRVs or SLVs. The landfill cap is proposed to be excavated and reused on-Site. 4.5 ACTION LEVELS RAs as described in Section 4.3 will be implemented where certain field screening criteria are exceeded. Screening criteria will vary depending on the relationship between field observation, analytical results and the physical proximity of the proposed redevelopment's features, as described below. It is anticipated that a Field Technician (FT) will be on-site during all excavation activities that have the potential to encounter contaminated media. 4.5.1 Proposed Building Footprint Areas The sandy clay cap material will be removed from the proposed building footprint areas with an additional 50-foot buffer around the buildings or up to the delineated wetland boundary (if encountered). The soil will be stockpiled on-site for reuse on-site or re-use off-site following MPCA guidance document "Best Management Practices for the Off-Site Reuse of Unregulated Fill", dated February 2012. Waste mixed with soil within the proposed building footprints and within a 50-foot buffer up to the delineated wetland boundary will be removed and transported by truck to an approved MPCA-permitted landfill or mechanically screened on-site. The waste layer will be removed down to groundwater or until native soils are reached, whichever is encountered first. The depth to groundwater is estimated at 969 to 973 feet above MSL. The excavations will be filled with clean soil to the proposed finished floor elevations. The proposed horizontal extents of the excavation are shown on Figure 4. There is a possibility that some waste materials could be effectively separated from impacted soils by mechanically screening the material. The waste may then be segregated and recycled or disposed properly. In addition, excavated tires and trees will not be accepted by the landfill and will need to be segregated for future recycling or disposal. vIS T March 2019 4-3 A WENCK Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. \\woodbury-dcl\Woodbury\Technical\5503 Lake West\03-RAP\Eisinger Meadows RAP 032919.docx 4.5.2 Utility Corridors Utility installation at the Site includes two infiltration basins, sanitary sewer, municipal water and stormwater. In addition, there will likely be shallower utility installations for natural gas, telephone and fiber optics. The utility corridors are proposed to be located below the driveways and paved parking lot. Underground stormwater infrastructure will be diverted from the multi-family buildings to the infiltration ponds on the west side of the Site. See Appendix B, page P-2 for the preliminary utility plan. The sandy clay cap will be removed from the utility corridors and stockpiled and reused on- site as described in Section 4.5.1. The waste mixed with soil will be removed down to groundwater or native soil, whichever is encountered first, within the utility corridors and backfilled to proposed grade with clean soils. 4.5.3 Green Space The proposed green space areas include three recreation areas. In the areas outside of the proposed excavation area for the building footprint and a 50-foot buffer zone beyond (Figure 4), the cap should act as a sufficient buffer between the waste and the surface as long as the cap is at least four-feet thick. The remaining green space areas beyond the proposed excavation area are located on the far north and south sides of the Site and will not be subject to the cap requirements discussed above. 4.5.4 Parking, Driveways and Sidewalks For the proposed paved areas such as driveways, parking lots, sidewalks and walking trails within the defined landfill area, soils will be removed as discussed in Section 4.5.1. The proposed paved areas are located within the proposed excavation area. Approximately 50% of the driveway leading north to Wayzata Boulevard is located within the landfill area. These soils will be excavated down to groundwater or native soils, whichever is encountered first, and backfilled with clean soils to accommodate utility installation. The remaining driveway areas outside of the landfill will be constructed according to geotechnical recommendations. 4.6 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL TESTING Sampling and analytical testing will be performed as necessary during RAP implementation. The three primary types of sampling and analytical testing include: 1. Excavated contaminated materials for disposal facility characterization (if required). 2. Imported materials required to backfill the excavation, foundations and utility trenches (if required). 3. Verification sampling of soil left in-place after excavation (as required). It is expected that the laboratory analysis data for soil from the previous Site investigations will be adequate to obtain disposal facility approvals for the project. If required by the selected disposal facility, additional sampling and analytical testing will be completed as required. Clean fill imported to the Site will be sampled and tested to ensure the materials are suitable for use. Prior to placement, additional information regarding the fill source will be obtained to verify the source of the imported soil and determine appropriate sampling and '1 WENCK March 2019 4-4 Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. \\woodbury-dc1\Woodbury\Technical\5503 Lake West\03-RAP\Eisinger Meadows RAP 032919.docx testing requirements. If the imported soil consists of native material from a previously undeveloped property, then a minimum of one sample of the soil will be collected for laboratory analysis of DRO, VOCs, PAHs and RCRA metals. Additional samples will be collected for laboratory analysis if multiple import sources are used, or if a potential source is from a previously developed property. The imported soil will be considered suitable for use on the Site if the results meet residential SRVs for all parameters. Soils imported from a pit or native source will not require analytical testing. Disposition of clean fill exported from the Site will be implemented in accordance with the MPCA guidance document "Best Management Practices for the Off-Site Reuse of Excess Fill from Development Sites" dated February 2012. Soil samples will be collected from the floor and sidewalls of the excavation areas that exhibit evidence of impacts upon completion of excavation activities in that area. These samples will be used to document contamination left in-place, if any. The documentation samples will be collected in accordance with MPCA Risk Based Guidance Documents. Analytical testing will include a combination of DRO, PAHs, RCRA metals as directed by the findings of the 2019 Wenck RI. Additional parameters may be added if warranted based on field conditions and consultation with the MPCA. 4.7 VAPOR MITIGATION The proposed multi-family buildings will contain one level of underground parking. As per the International Mechanical Code as adopted and amended by the State of Minnesota section 1346.0404.1, enclosed parking garages are to be ventilated at the rate of 0.75 cubic feet per minute per square foot of space. In addition, a passive radon mitigation system will be installed below the slab of the underground parking garage to mitigate potential issues from soil gas. Each of the single-family villas will also have a passive radon mitigation system installed below the slab of the basement floor. Details of the radon mitigation system(s) will be forwarded under separate cover for MPCA review. March 2019 4-5 ^ WENCK Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. \\woodbury-dcl\Woodbury\Technical\5503 Lake West\03-RAP\Eisinger Meadows RAP 032919.docx 5. 0 Construction Contingency Plan 5.1 GENERAL This RAP/CCP has been prepared to address the handling of suspected contaminated fill soils, as well as any unanticipated wastes that may be encountered during the implementation of the proposed subsurface construction-related activities. A list of potential waste types is discussed in greater detail in Section 5.6 below. If encountered, these materials must be managed consistent with statutes, rules, regulations and guidance from applicable federal, state and local agencies governing the excavation, management, sampling, storage, transportation and disposal of this material. In the event that an unanticipated waste or contaminated soil is encountered, Wenck will conduct a hazard assessment/evaluation to determine health and safety requirements (i.e., assessment of monitoring activities, personal protective equipment (PPE) requirements, etc.). If necessary, upon completion of the field assessment the Site Health and Safety Plan (SHSP) will be modified within 24-hours. Safety requirements will then be communicated to all contractors involved in handling the unanticipated waste or contaminated soils. 5.2 PROJECT ORGANIZATION The proposed redevelopment consists of construction of a large commercial building addition, with a loading dock, a surface parking lot and associated utilities. Lakewest is the planned Owner and Developer with the ultimate authority for the implementation of the RAP and construction of the Site improvements. 5.2.1 Current Property Owner and Planned Developer — Lakewest, LLC Contact: Mr. Perry Ryan, P.E. Lakewest, LLC 14525 Highway 7, Suite 265 Minnetonka, MN 55345 Office: 952-653-1359 Cell: 952-221-3700 Email: perry@lwestdev.com vA WENCK March 2019 5-1 Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. \\woodbury-dcl\Woodbury\Technical\5503 Lake West\03-RAP\Eisinger Meadows RAP 032919.docx 5.2.2 Owner's Environmental Consultant - Wenck Associates, Inc. Contact: Ms. Michelle Hosfield Environmental Scientist/Associate Wenck Associates, Inc. 1802 Wooddale Drive Woodbury, Minnesota 55125 Office: 651-395-5224 Email: mhosfield@wenck.com 5.2.3 Construction Contractor Information - TBD 5.2.4 Regulatory Agency - Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Mr. Mark Ostby Hydrologist MPCA VIC Program/Superfund Site Assessment 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 Office: 651-757-2283 Email: mark.ostby@state.mn.us 5.3 SITE CONTROL During any subsurface construction activities in suspected impacted areas, Wenck will have a Field Technician on-site to oversee the handling of the Site soil. If during these activities contaminated media is encountered, the Field Technician will communicate with the Wenck Project Manager who will provide direction on risk and materials management procedures. The Field Technician will provide on-site hazard evaluation of the encountered wastes or contaminated soil, and the Project Manager will coordinate communication with the parties listed above any findings, recommended actions, or change in status. While on-site, the Field Technician will monitor and collect samples for testing and disposition determination of any such wastes or contaminated soil, including maintaining the appropriate documentation throughout the project (i.e., chain-of-custody documentation, lab testing results, disposal manifests, etc.) The Field Technician shall have, at a minimum, a 40-Hour Hazardous Site Worker Operator (HAZWOPER) Certification including any and all 8-hour refreshers. If wastes or contaminated soil is encountered during Project work, an exclusion zone will be designated on-site around the area of concern. The zone will be physically delineated by the Field Technician with flagging, caution tape, or fencing, as appropriate. The Project Manager will notify the Construction Contractor to provide the necessary workers or subcontractors to perform any work within the exclusion zone. All personnel allowed entry into the exclusion zone shall be properly trained and certified. Prior to conducting the work the contractor will be required to provide copies of personnel 40-hour HAZWOPER certifications as well as a copy of the contractor's Health and Safety Plan prior to conducting work. Only personnel who have proof of up-to-date certification (i.e., HAZWOPER) will be allowed to enter the exclusion zone. Public access to the Site will be restricted, and any compromised perimeter fencing that may allow unauthorized access will be promptly repaired. In the event that an exclusion March 2019 5-2 ^ WENCK Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. \\woodbury-dcl\Woodbury\Technical\5503 Lake West\03-RAP\Eisinger Meadows RAP 032919.docx zone is needed, the Wenck Project Manager will direct further Response Actions in conjunction with MPCA oversight. 5.4 RECOGNITION OF POTENTIAL WASTE AND/OR CONTAMINATED SOILS The following occurrences may be signs that hazardous materials have been encountered at the Site during the subsurface activities: A Strong or unusual chemical odors of solvents, petroleum, etc. from the excavation; A Encountering suspected industrial waste such as tars, sludges, semi-solids, powders, resins, or liquids in the excavation; A Encountering suspected ACM material; A Discolored soils in or from the excavation; A Drums and/or containers (labeled or unlabeled), buried metal objects such as cans, jars, or tanks in the excavation; or A Persons who suddenly become ill. If any of the above occurs indicating that a hazardous substance may have been encountered, activities will be suspended pending further evaluation. As mentioned above, the Wenck Field Technician will assess the situation in consultation with the Project Manager using the available field instrumentation, personal protective equipment, and his/her own knowledge and experience to determine the nature of the material and whether it should be segregated for special handling. The Field Technician will then ensure that Site personnel follow the instructions provided. 5.5 SITE HAZARD EVALUATION ACTIVITIES 5.5.1 Chemical Vapor Hazards Based on investigation findings, it is unlikely that concentrations of chemical vapors will be generated during invasive earthwork activities at the site. Should the Field Technician discover evidence of a potential vapor hazard, site activities will be temporarily discontinued. The area in question will be secured and evaluated. Work will continue only after the hazard has been thoroughly evaluated and mitigation and air monitoring plans have been generated. 5.5.2 Particulate Hazards Particulate matter may be made airborne during excavation activities. Inhalation is the most rapid route of exposure to the body by immediately introducing substances to the respiratory tissue and bloodstream. Health hazards to on-site workers could also exist from ingestion and through dermal contact with compounds. Ingestion of substances should be virtually eliminated by forbidding eating, drinking, smoking, and any other hand-to- mouth activities on-site. Hands and face should be washed after leaving the site and prior to any eating, drinking or smoking. Dermal contact will be minimized by hand washing, wearing proper protective clothing, and by using gloves during sampling activities. 5.6 WASTE EVALUATION In general, excavated, graded and/or augured soils from within the Project area will be continuously inspected for the presence of: A Demolition debris, vA WENCK March 2019 5-3 Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. \\woodbury-dc1\Woodbury\Technical\5503 Lake West\03-RAP\Eisinger Meadows RAP 032919.docx A General refuse, A Free product (chemical Dense Non-Aqueous Phase Liquid [DNAPL], oil residues, sludge, etc.), A Underground Storage Tanks (USTs), A Barreled wastes, A Electrical transformers, A Creosote timbers, A Car batteries, A Oil filters, A Waste tires, A Stained soils and/or soils exhibiting strong or unusual odors, A Asbestos-containing materials (ACM), or A Any other unusual fill material. If the above items are identified during excavation, the material will be segregated based on waste type. Additional discussion on segregation and screening procedures is discussed below. 5.6.1 Demolition Debris Demolition debris (if encountered) will be segregated from soils and stored in an area designated by Wenck separately from soil that appears unimpacted. Demolition debris will be appropriately characterized and subsequently disposed at a permitted demolition solid waste disposal facility. If asbestos-containing materials (ACM) or asbestos-containing waste materials (ACWM) are observed, work will be discontinued and an appropriately certified inspector will be sent to the site to sample the material. If ACM or ACWM is identified, a licensed asbestos removal contractor will be hired to remove the material from the site. All work including, but not limited to, notification, air monitoring, waste handling and disposal will be conducted per 40 CFR Part 61, Subpart M. 5.6.2 Refuse Excavated materials may include a mixture of decomposable organic materials (wood, paper, vegetation, etc.) and inorganic material such as glass, plastic, metal, etc. Excavated refuse materials mixed with soil will be segregated and placed in a designated area for testing followed by off-site disposal. Wenck in consultation with the MPCA, will determine appropriate testing requirements for disposal purposes. 5.6.3 Free Product If free-product is encountered, work will cease until appropriate collection measures can be assembled on the site and the MPCA representative notified. Wenck, in consultation with the MPCA, will determine appropriate handling, testing and disposal requirements. 5.6.4 Underground Storage Tanks If unknown underground storage tanks (UST) are encountered, following determination of whether any product remains, an MPCA-certified UST contractor will remove the tanks. Residual products will be removed from the tank(s) and transported off-site for proper disposal. The tank(s), if of iron construction, will be hauled to a scrap facility to be recycled. Wenck, in consultation with the MPCA, will determine appropriate handling, testing and disposal requirements. March 2019 5-4 ^ WENCK Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. \\woodbury-dcl\Woodbury\Technical\5503 Lake West\03-RAP\Eisinger Meadows RAP 032919.docx 5.6.5 Barreled Wastes DOT approved over pack drums will be used to contain buried barreled wastes if they are discovered. Wenck, in consultation with the MPCA, will determine appropriate testing requirements for disposal purposes. After approval from the MPCA, testing of the materials will be conducted for disposal purposes. Wenck will retain appropriate documentation for future reference. The contents of the drum will be sampled and characterized for disposal in accordance with appropriate state and federal requirements. 5.6.6 Electrical Transformers If buried electrical transformers are encountered, it should be immediately determined whether they are still connected and energized. They should be sampled for the presence of PCBs and handled according to Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA) and applicable MPCA regulations. It should be ascertained whether they need to be drained prior to transport and handled according to Minnesota Department of Transportation (MNDOT) regulations. If leakage is observed surrounding the transformers, soil sampling should be conducted according to MPCA guidance. 5.6.7 Creosote Timbers Materials such as treated railroad ties or wooden pavers will be removed from the subsurface and managed appropriately (i.e., recycled or disposed of off-site). Wenck in consultation with the MPCA, will determine appropriate handling, testing and disposal requirements. Wenck will retain appropriate documentation for future reference. 5.6.8 Batteries Batteries (if encountered) will be segregated from soils and placed in a corrosion-resistant box. Any recovered batteries will be collected by an approved vendor and hauled off-site for recycling. Wenck, in consultation with the MPCA, will determine appropriate handling, testing and disposal requirements. Wenck will retain appropriate documentation for future reference. 5.6.9 Oil Filters Oil filters will be segregated from the soil and placed in a steel 55-gallon drum. When a sufficient number of filters are accumulated, they will be picked up by an approved vendor and hauled off-site for recycling. Wenck, in consultation with the MPCA, will determine appropriate handling, testing and disposal requirements. Wenck will retain appropriate documentation for future reference. 5.6.10 Waste Tires Waste tires will be segregated from the soil and placed in a covered roll-off container. When a sufficient number of tires are accumulated, they will be collected by an approved vendor and hauled off-site for recycling. Wenck, in consultation with the MPCA, will determine appropriate handling, testing and disposal requirements. Wenck will retain appropriate documentation for future reference. '1V WENCK March 2019 5-5 Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. \\woodbury-dcl\Woodbury\Technical\5503 Lake West\03-RAP\Eisinger Meadows RAP 032919.docx 5.6.11 Stained Soils or Soils Exhibiting Strong or Unusual Odors Soils revealing unusual staining or odors will be segregated from the excavated materials. The materials will be placed in stockpiles and screened using the field screening procedures in Section 5.7 below. Wenck, in consultation with the MPCA and the receiving landfill, will determine appropriate testing requirements for disposal purposes. Following appropriate sampling and analytical testing, the materials will be hauled off site for proper disposal. Wenck will retain appropriate documentation for future reference. 5.7 FIELD SCREENING AND SAMPLING OF CONTAMINATED SOIL The following presents a general overview of the collection of soil samples for field screening and analytical testing. Field screening and soil sampling activities associated with petroleum-related impacts will follow the procedures outlined in the MPCA Guidance Documents. 5.7.1 Headspace Screening Procedure Contaminated soils will first be screened for the presence of petroleum-related constituents using soil headspace methodology and sheen testing. The following equipment will be used to conduct headspace organic vapor screening: photoionization detector (PID), clean, pint- sized polyethylene bag baggies, log book, or record sheet, and approved personal protective equipment. PIDs will be equipped with a 10.6 eV lamp source. Headspace screening will be performed using PID instrumentation. The PID calibration will be performed on-site and at least daily to yield "total organic vapors" in volume parts-per-million (ppm) of an isobutylene equivalent. Wenck will follow the manufacturer's instructions for operation, maintenance, and calibration of the instrument. Wenck will keep calibration records in the field book. Wenck will collect samples from excavation walls, soil piles, or backhoe buckets from freshly exposed surfaces. For consistency, only static headspace analysis for field screening of soil samples is to be used. Static headspace analysis must be performed using the following method: 1. Using a stainless steel spoon or gloved hand, half-fill a new polyethylene bag with sample (the volume ratio of soil to air is equal), then immediately seal it. Manually break up the soil clumps within the bag. 2. Allow headspace development for at least 15 minutes at approximate room temperature. Vigorously shake bags for 15 seconds at the beginning and end of the headspace development period. When temperatures are below the operating range of the instrument, perform headspace development and analysis in a heated vehicle or building. Keep the sample in a shaded area out of direct sunlight. Record the ambient temperature during headspace screening. Complete headspace analysis within approximately 20 minutes of sample collection. 3. After headspace development, introduce the instrument sampling probe through a small opening in the bag to a point about one-half of the headspace depth. Keep the probe free of water droplets and soil particles. 4. Record the highest meter response on a sampling form. Maximum response usually occurs within about two seconds. Erratic meter response may occur if high organic vapor concentrations or moisture is present. Note any erratic headspace data in the field book. March 2019 5-6 A WENCK Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. \\woodbury-dct\Woodbury\Technical\5503 Lake West\03-RAP\Eisinger Meadows RAP 032919.docx Impacted soil exhibiting headspace results greater than 10 ppm will be segregated separately from impacted soil exhibiting a headspace result less than 10 ppm. Soil not exhibiting any of the evidence of petroleum impacts or waste types listed in Section 5.6 will not be sampled and be re-used on-site as unrestricted fill. 5.7.2 Soil Segregation and Sampling Soil exhibiting evidence of a typical contamination, as identified in Section 5.6 above, will be segregated and stockpiled based on the waste characteristic or type. The Field Technician will coordinate with the Construction Contractor to determine and secure a staging area for placement of contaminated soil. The contractor will prepare the area by placing a 10-mil plastic on the ground and constructing a 1-foot high soil berm around the perimeter. The plastic will extend beyond the perimeter berm to prevent runoff from and run-on to the staging area. At the end of the day, and prior to leaving the site, the stockpile(s) will be covered with 10-mil plastic sheeting and properly secured. The cover will extend beyond the perimeter soil berm and will be maintained as necessary. Soil will be sampled at the following rates: Table 5-1: General Soil Sampling Rates Stockpile Size Number of (cubic yards) Samples 0 — 500 1 per 100 cubic yards 501 — 1,000 1 per 250 cubic yards 1,001 or more 1 per 500 cubic yards Note: Sampling frequency will be determined in cooperation with landfill and MPCA representatives 5.8 GENERAL SOIL SAMPLING PROCEDURES Prior to collecting soil samples, each sample container label will be completed in the field using a waterproof permanent marker. Labels will include the following information: A Site name A Sample identification code A Project number A Date/time A Sampler's initials A Preservation added (if any) A Analysis to be performed To minimize the possibility of cross-contamination, a new pair of disposable (i.e., nitrile or latex) gloves will be used for each sample collected. When using a sampling tool (i.e., spade or coring device), wash the tool with a detergent solution (e.g. Liquinox, Alconox or equivalent), rinse it, and then dry it before each use. Samples collected for laboratory analyses will be immediately placed in their appropriate lab-provided containers (with preservatives if applicable), placed on ice and shipped to the laboratory for analysis. When sampling excavation stockpiles, sidewalls or floors, the Field WWENCK March 2019 5-7 Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. \\woodbury-dcl\Woodbury\Technical\5503 Lake West\03-RAP\Eisinger Meadows RAP 032919.docx Technician will remove at least one foot of exposed soil prior to collecting the sample to ensure the collection of a fresh sample. Samples previously used for soil screening or soil classification for analytical samples will not be used for laboratory analysis. Quality control samples including blind field blanks, matrix spike (MS) and matrix spike duplicate (MSD) samples will be collected as part of the field sampling activities. Field duplicate samples will be collected at a ratio of 1:10. MS and MSD samples will be collected at a rate of 1:10 for the MS samples and 1:20 for the MSD samples. Laboratory-provided trip blanks will be sent with all sample coolers containing volatiles samples. 5.8.1 Stockpile Sampling Procedures Soil stockpile sample parameters will be determined after consulting with the MPCA. In general, sample parameters will depend on field screening results and type of waste. 5.8.2 Excavation Sampling Upon completion of any subsurface construction activities within an area exhibiting evidence of waste or contaminated soil that will remain in place and prior to the placement of any necessary engineered fill as part of future grading activities, confirmation samples will be collected to characterize materials left in place. Where sidewalls are present in the excavation area, sidewall samples will be collected as soon as possible so as to not delay Project activities. Samples will be collected at defined minimum sample spacing along sidewalls in areas where impacts have been noted during field investigation activities and potential contamination is left in-place. Samples will be collected in accessible areas. The table below lists the minimum number of samples anticipated to be collected from Response Action excavations: Table 5-2: Typical Excavation Minimum Confirmation Sampling Rates Area of Floor Number of Area of Sidewall Number of (sq ft) Floor Samples (sq ft) Sidewall Samples <500 2 <500 4 500 <1,000 3 500-<1,000 5 1,000-<1,500 4 1,000_<1,500 6 1,500-<2,500 5 1,500_<2,000 7 2,500-<4,000 6 2,000-<3,000 8 4,000-<6,000 7 3,000-<4,000 9 6,000-<8,500 8 >4,000 1 per 45 lineal feet 8,500-<10,890 9 (0.25 acres) >10,890 30 foot grid -- -- After samples are collected, the construction activities will be continued. Immediately upon collection of the confirmation samples Wenck, in consultation with the MPCA, will determine appropriate testing requirements based on the type of waste encountered. After determining sampling parameters, the samples will be immediately placed into appropriate lab-provided containers, labeled and placed on ice for transport to the laboratory performing the analytical testing. V^SWENCK March 2019 5-8 Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. \\woodbury-dc1\Woodbury\Technical\5503 Lake West\03-RAP\Eisinger Meadows RAP 0329t9.docx All floor and sidewall confirmation sample locations will be documented and may be quickly surveyed using a hand-held GPS device. The location of the trench may also be quickly surveyed to provide general location information. Excavation depths will be estimated. 5.8.3 Typical Laboratory Methodologies Table 5-3: Typical Laboratory Methodologies Analyte Method Sample Sample Field Hold Container Volume Preservation Time Method 6010 or 180 Metals 6020/7471 4 oz. ass 150 grams None days Prep Method 1311/Method 6010 or 180 TCLP Metals 6020/7471 4 oz. glass 250 grams None days PCBs Method 80824 oz. glass 250 grams None 14 days Method 8270 by .. _ PAHs/SVOCs SIM 4 oz. glass 250 grams None 14 days None (lab preserved WI Method 60 ml amber w/methylene DRO Modified 8015 glass 25-35 grams chloride) 14 days WI Method 60 ml amber GRO Modified 8015 glass 25-35 grams Methanol 14 days Method 5035 Method 8260 40 ml amber Methanol VOCs MN466 glass 5 grams (1:1 ratio) 14 days If through consultation with the MPCA it is determined samples not included in the above list are required for disposal or confirmation purposes laboratory, methodologies will be forwarded to the MPCA at that time. 5.9 DISPOSITION REQUIREMENTS Waste generated during the project that has been determined to not meet the reuse scenarios discussed above will be appropriately profiled and disposed in a permitted landfill within thirty days of receiving landfill disposal approval. 5.10 GENERAL FIELD DOCUMENTATION PROCEDURES General field documentation procedures include: A The FT will maintain a daily field log which will contain the following information: date, time, temperature, wind direction, name of personnel on-site (contractors, regulatory officials, other representatives, etc.) status of project, and monitoring results from the contractors and Wenck. A Photo-documentation of the field work. A The Field Technician will maintain all disposal documentation generated during the field activities. A Organization and proper handling of any other necessary documentation generated during the field activities. W WENCK March 2019 5-9 Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. \\woodbury-dcl\Woodbury\Technical\5503 Lake West\03-RAP\Eisinger Meadows RAP 032919.docx 5.11 EXCAVATION BACKFILL MATERIAL It is the responsibility of the contractor to provide clean backfill material. Clean backfill will be used in areas where waste has been encountered and removed from the construction area only if adequate on-site material is not present. Wenck will request proper documentation to characterize the imported soil so that it meets Site environmental criteria. March 2019 5-10 A. WENCK Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. \\woodbury-dcl\Woodbury\Technical\5503 Lake West\03-RAP\Elsinger Meadows RAP 032919.docx 6.0 Implementation Reporting It is anticipated that the Site development will begin in summer 2019. Upon completion of the Site excavation, replacement filling, grading and utility activities (i.e., earthwork) related to the redevelopment project, an Implementation Report summarizing the RAP/CCP activities, and any laboratory analytical testing results necessary to document Site conditions, will be submitted to the MPCA for review. If necessary, an Environmental Restrictive Covenant will be prepared to memorialize any residual impacts requiring continuing obligations. 9S WENCK March 2019 6-1 Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. \\woodbury-dc1\Woodbury\Technical\5503 Lake West\03-RAP\Eisinger Meadows RAP 032919.docx 7. 0 References Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Best Management Practices for the Off-Site Reuse of Unregulated Fill, Document c-rem1-01, February 2012 University of Minnesota, Geologic Atlas, Hennepin County, Minnesota, 1989. EnecoTech Midwest, Inc., Drilling Investigation Report, Minnesota Department of Transportation, State Trunk Highway 12, Long Lake, Minnesota, Volume 1 Report, Figures, Tables, October 9, 2002. GME Consultants, Inc., Phase II Environmental Site Assessment, Howard Eisinger Property, 3245 West Wayzata Boulevard, Orono, Minnesota, April 13, 1999. Haugo Geotechnical Services, Inc., Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Eisinger Property, 3245 Wayzata Boulevard, Orono, Minnesota, October 9, 2014. Haugo Geotechnical Services, Inc., Geotechnical Exploration Report, Eisinger Estate Residential Development, 3245 Wayzata Boulevard, Orono, Minnesota, October 21, 2014. Haugo Geotechnical Services, Inc., Proposed Redevelopment - Eisinger Meadows, 3245 Wayzata Boulevard, Orono, Minnesota - Supplemental Boring Logs, September 18, 2015 and October 30, 2015. Wenck Associates, Inc., Test Pit Sampling Data Report for Proposed Eisinger Development, July 8, 2015. Wenck Associates, Inc., Revised Investigation Work Plan, Eisinger Meadows, 3245 Wayzata Boulevard W., Orono, Minnesota 55356, MPCA Project No. VP11342, February 2019. Wenck Associates, Inc., Remedial Investigation Report, Eisinger Meadows, 3245 Wayzata Boulevard W., Orono, Minnesota 55356, MPCA Project No. VP11342, March 2019. Other materials referenced in this report are cited in the text and included in the appendices. March 2019 7-1 vA WENCK Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. \\woodbury-dcl\Woodbury\Technical\5503 Lake West\03-RAP\Eisinger Meadows RAP 032919.docx 8.0 Standard of Care and Signatures The standard of care for all professional services performed by Wenck Associates, Inc. (Wenck) and presented within this report is the care, skill, and diligence used by members of the consulting services profession practicing under similar circumstances at the same time and in the same locality. Wenck makes no warranties, express or implied, with respect to this report or otherwise, in connection with Wenck's services. Report Prepared by: Report Reviewed by: Michelle L. Hosfield Shane A. Waterman, P.G. Environmental Scientist Principal T^VWENCK March 2019 8-1 Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. \\woodbury-dcl\Woodbury\Technical\5503 Lake West\03-RAP\Eisinger Meadows RAP 032919.docx Figures 1. Site Location Map 2. Site Detail Map 3. Boring Locations Map and Extent of Landfill and Fill Soils 4. Proposed Extent of Excavation 7-7-4,--;: -..--, ,,� � _ tai . * ''s - -1 ,,..„ -R . gi r V s {{ 5 lato 1 ....., i ti , fn' s- ^'R' $Dl :,,0,CC) - .,(71#F• �.Alty - -'^�► -- crit �fZ f'\hIs � ', ,, , T ' a Z - _- __ � � ���. �,C Subject Property - �� ./..r. .�" :tir:iiiii ,-,,,, 7- , - 1 ,' T.". ...:-.• i ! 7� z lisi \\ .le%t a .._*5.,'� + +' - ` `) �c `~gypY .1r. .-01.2.1.0.,...,:, H Y l�C \rr� ') I/�f + . A �jV rr t ` . ,Y Q . -- -i.l s t41 \��, x � � . .,.. V ..,. -��.• 9 Anoka `. 1t ' ` ' •::'-''•'\ .ice. County N. `'. ,• v r) „ �'' , r " s Wright Area of Detail *,,. -_aatB � yn% _ County Hennepin Excelsior 7.5 MinuQQuadrangle USGS: 19 7 t County Rockford 7.5 Minute Quadrangle(USGS: 1993) . Hamel 7.5 MinuteQuadrangle (USGS: 1993 112, -..- 1,1. Mound 7.5 Minute Quadrangle(USGS: 1993) t '' 1i 2,000 1,000 0 2,000 sem_-•... ,� 1 Carver County Feet ry`'`>' �_{ �' Scott Path.L15503�0002\MXD\S�Location Mp.mxd sse't Y "CO r. ht©72O13~N • County Date:1/252017 Time:3:1303 PM User:Ka,,H0060fi �' „ %�. Py g' t - a fil7LAKEWEST, LLC ^�WENCK JAN 2017 Site Location Map Responsive partner Exceptional outcomes. Figure 1 I „ fit '.apt sS l -91! fS$i$ t \ X3• '4�' ¥ ¥_ g fya ;,, -4,-",.--,7:--;•,.'Pl1 --- Subject Property - N ;•..' if � .. �. _. Via. i. a \,,,,,,,:,„,,,,,„., , . . , •,,, , . .-:,-,,,,r..#1;:!:,,Z,:',„::--.-'-'; ),. ' - ,aa , ,,,..,,a i74 :, N. ,,y i.,..;-:,.: 9 V ''. I.. l L ., ah Y Q} w .A I b y.. „ii mom,„ S € d F M1 "* J'''' „-lg Y . b� V 2015 Aerial Photograph (Source: Hennepin County) N • 300 150 0 300 A . .,:,.4...,..k...-..: Feet r<• . . ;; ., Path:L:\5503100021MXD\Site Setail M�.mx� f� - ”- '� • Vii, Date:1/25/2017 Time:3:15:25 PM Usaer:KacHD0606 LAKEWEST, LLC �WENCK JAN 2017 - ASSOCIATES Site Detail Map Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. Figure 2 �" �" � (L�`....r." Legend �,,, c`t.- mm i�f �� 10 f� • . 1111" • ( Wenck Boring Locations �fl y, 51 9 s�Y ° ls 10 ! .Ill III 1111 �. 1 ,. • So FeGMatch 2019 i x • - `^®® �.�.Ili •�fil . ........1_,_......_ vi f x'' ® So Vapor FebMarch 2019 �� € \,4 2,f:: ®iJ '� No ■ �'+ ♦ So l and Groundwater march 2019 \\rJ , `� . Test Pit Locations tv� ® se ae • �� I LI II � 7„ ■ July tots �, � in �s a .i,, ��• • • k+�� Hau90 Geotech Borin9s /�rp1 J r,, `'ESU �.,..�� October.2015 �� \ ' ,r, ® September,2015 I f ";d \ a 21 fF��d"` i y. M s ' dj Approwmate Haugo Geoteeh Borings � � sv is �• � $ ',t ` • Au9us1 2014 • [ ` . 'Arr ➢ App oximate EnecoTech Borings 9 • B r ! . ' • August 2000 ''''s r. c z ��. OO May 2001 5 Approximate GME Push Probes Match 1998 a • y - i + A(Note'.Looeton of P 12 not known) 1e _ , f :{' ;i.: bo tindery orf thertandfill •`' „ _. Approx mate extent of fll B N`= so Is partof the landfll cap N vv ..' Er ��aa�� �a 3 rx County Parcels � 1B 'I c1 pin R l #{, A �sa • , t' F c ;,`'s 120 'Bs .,. . Feet LAKEWEST,LLC—EISINGER MEADOWS DEVELOPMENT �WENCK MAR 2019 Boring Locations Map and Extent of Landfill and Fill Soils Qe Po iepz.me..ea<ePrl nz ut<omes. Figure 3 •�. ss i I fl I Legend SS-23 v Wenck Bor ng Locations s . s SS 15 isvz oi ".� • • SOI FebMarch 2019 f I In ' o a® 110 1. ,lso 317. II 11 •� r 141,' O Sol FebMarch 2019 SS 13 ��f % Mr F z'+ ; �P 13 r,n Qsa„ 1■ �E , J'A Vapor • • Sal and Groundvater FebMarch 2019 f \I f+I :' lila 111-1-111-1-016i'� II } -.„.`° g - fa�k€l ,inoz,. �, R'�, I al i . Test Pit Locations {n # �: �" f�£il f ` 'li II ■ July,2015 R£4 � Haugo Geotech Borings _ �� t Qom} Do ti • October 20 15 "' � 's p x ® September 2015 { a. 2�aw- pf'. �`� a�� �fT� - APProxlmate Haugo Geotech Borings l' ` PB • Ij � � • t2014 9 ak � � •,? 't nig,. '� • August�s 1 2 11 YI r� Approz mate EnecoTech Borings B% } • n � 4 • Augaat zo0o a �' r! t. 'd '' -. 4 . 'r`. OMay,2001 ` slipjir.#010'..rAfiii9 ,1 ' .iiii1 Approximate GME Push Probes March 1898 '' p r + (Nota Location of P 12 not known) 4' r� I 9 Approximate northeast l,.. - '� ' . '� ., g boundary of the landfill F t " ,p� h •« r; -Approti mate eztenl of I e ^ Os-ia • r ,, - V�Excava9onLmts i _.� ~\ ¥ \ OCounty Parcels P t:_ , + E I h : r' I 0 6 rw.r' « f =aa • fA`, p Er' 120 60 0 120 O ty 11.sL i ^) `=d€•-. t:'�Sa�lc{vv. - `s1`"__. _.___ .._ .1.'.z_. .nom.a: 7,..:=:.,";;:a-n-:,,,,,,,,--t,.::.7,.., LAKEWEST, LLC—EISINGER MEADOWS DEVELOPMENT T^'WENCK APR 2019 Extent of Excavation Map perpo s;earcoe,E.,er;o a,o rrome. Figure 4 Tables Table 1 : Soil Analytical Summary Table 2: Soil Vapor Analytical Results Summary Table 3: Groundwater Analytical Results Summary 0 Table 1 Soil Analytical Results Eisinpor Meadows Orono.MN 41(5-103 B-2(15-201 (12.5-153 B-4(12.5-15)B-5(20-225)B-6 02.5-25) 47 05-21r) B-7(510) 48(15-17.51) B-9(4103 410(0-5') Trip Blank Tripe.. 4.„.r, ,,,,,,.,,,,, Compound Parameter CAS No. 310-149954-1 310-149954-2 310-149954-3 310-149954-4 310-149954-5 310-150364-2 310-150364-0 310-150364-3 314150364-5 310-150364,310-150364-7 310-150364-1 310-149954-6 '0; St, 02/21/2019 022162019 022120. 02/212019 0221/2019 0321/2019 0301/2019 0301/2019 03/01/2019 03/012019 03/01/2019 03/012019 0221/2019 1.1.1,-Terec01o1ne16ano 630-20-6.1 <0139 <0.137 00.163 J 0.190 <0.374 <0.203 <0.223 1 <0.162 <0.149 <0136 <0.148 <0.100 0.100 1,1.1-Tnchloroetnane 71-55-6 <0.139 <0.137 <0.169 <0.190 <0.374 <0.206 <0.223 <0.162 <0.149 <0.136 <0.148 <0.100 <0.100 ' 140 56 1,12,2-Te1rach1<roelhane 7434-5 <0.139 <0.137 <0.169 <0.190 <0.374 <0.208 <0.223 <0.162 0.149 <0.136 <0.148 00.100 <0.100 ' 35 00) 1.1.2-Tdohloroothano 79-00-5 <0.139 <0.137 <0.169 <0.190 <0.374 <0.208 <0.223 <0.162 <0.149 <0.136 0.148 <0.100 <0.100 9 0.01 1,1.2-Trichbrotr650roethane 76-13-1 <0.139 <0.137 <0.169 <0.190 <0.374 <0.208 <0.223 <0.162 <0.149 <0.136 <0,148 <0.100 <0.100 3745 17000 1,1-Dchloroethene 75-34-3 <0.139 0.137 <0.169 00.100 <0.374 <0.208 <0.223 <0.162 0.149 <0.136 <0.148 <0.100 <0.100 34 0,4 1 1-Dich63oethene 75-35-4 <0.139 43.137 <0.169 <0.190 00.374 0.206 <0223 <0.162 00.149 <0.136 <0148 <0.100 <0.100 20 1.4 1 01-Dichloropropene 563-38-6 <0.139 <0.137 <0.169 <0.190 <0.374 <0.206 <0.223 <0.162 <0.149 <0.136 <0.148 <0.100 <0.100 NE NE 1,2,3-Trichlorohe neene 67-61-6 <0.139 40.137 <0.169 <0,190 <0.374 <0.206 <0.223 00.162 <0,149 <0.136 <0.148 <0.100 <0.100 ii, NE NE 1,2 3-40.1oropro pane 96-18-4 <0.139 <0.137 <0.169 <0,190 <0.374 <0.208 <0.223 <0.162 <0.149 00.136 <0.148 <0.100 <0.100 0 NE 05 1,2.4-4n.1<robe12ene 120-82-1 <0.139 0.137 <0.169 00.190 <0.374 <0.208 00.223 00.162 00,149 <0.136 00148 <0.100 00.100 " 200 0.2 1,2,4-Tmnethy56n8ena 95-63-6 <0.139 2.19 <0.169 00.1. , <0.208 0.398 <0.162 <0.1. <0.136 <0.148 <0.100 <0.100 1' 8 2.7 1,2-Dihrorno-3-Chlorepropane 96-12-8 <0.139 <0.137 <0.169 <0.190 <0374 <0.208 <0 223 <0.162 <0.149 <0.136 <0.1. 00.100 00.100 NE NE 1.2-106romoathane(E06) 106-93-4 <0.139 <0.137 <0.169 <0.190 <0.374 <0,208 <0.223 00.162 <0.1. <0,136 <0.1. <0.103 00.101 E 0.3 1.58-005 1.2-01.1aroben2ene 95-30-1 <0.139 <0.137 00.169 00.190 0.623 <0,208 00.223 00.162 <0.149 <0.136 00.1. <0.100 <0.100 . 26 11 1.2-0.1oroethane 107,6-2 <0.139 <0.137 00.169 00.190 <0.374 <0.2061 <0 223 00.162 <0.149 <0.136 06148 <6100 <0.100 0 9 0.004 1.2-10ch1<ropmpane 78-87-5 <0.139 <0.137 00.169 <0.190 <0.374 0.208 <0.223 <0.162 <0.149 <0.136 <0.148 <0.100 <0.100 7 4 0,02 1,3,5-Trime06benzene 108-67-8 <0.139 0.567 <0.169 <0.190 1.87 0.2. <0.223 00.162 <0.1. <0.136 <0.U8 <0.100 .100 0 3 2.7 1.3-10.1oroben2ene 541-73-1 <0.139 <0.137 <0.169 <0.190 <0.374 <0.208 <0.223 <0,162 <0.1. <0.136 <0.148 00.100 00.100 26 10 1.3-13.61opro7211e 142-28-9 <0.139 <0137 <0.169 00.190 00.374 <0.208 <0.223 00.162 <0.149 <0.136 <0.148 <0.100 <0.100NE NE 14-01<11loro6enzene 106-46-7 00139 <0.137 °W0013.040.0" <0.190 4ME00IR1*. 00.206 1340068, <0.162 <0.149 <0.136 <0.148 <0.100 <0.100 ii 30 0, 22-D8hloroprep12e 594-20-7 <0.139 <0.137 0.169 <0.190 00.374 <0.208 00.223 <0.162 <0.149 <0.136 <0.148 00.103 <0.100 ; NE NE 2-6001<10(88K) 78-93-3 <0.346 <0.343 <0.422 <0.475 <0.935 <0.520 00.557 <0.405 <0.372 <0.339 <0.371 <0.250 <0.250 i, 5500 00 2-Chlorobaluene 95,49-8 <0.139 <0.137 <0.169 <0.190 <0.374 <0.208 00.223 <0.162 <0.149 <0.136 <0.148 <0.100 <0.100 4 436 NE 4-Ch1<rotoluene 106-43-4 <0.139 <0.137 00.169 <0.190 <0.374 <0.208 <0.223 <0.162 <0.149 <0.136 <0.148 <0.100 0.100 , NE NE 4-Met171-2-pen0none O4)6K) 108-10-1 00.139 00.137 00.169 <0.190 <0.374 00.208 <0.223 <0.162 <0.149 <0.136 0.148 <0.103 <0.100 0 1703 0.8 Acetone 67-64-1 <0.693 <0.666 <0.844 00.950 <1.87 <1.04 <1.11 <0609 00.745 <0.679 <0,742 <0.500 „, 00.500 03)0j01.,340 8.4 Alyl chbo Ode 107-05-1 <0.139 <0.137 <0.169 <0.193 <0.374 00.208 <0.223 <0.162 <0.149 <0.136 00.143 <0100 <0.100 ; ,E 0, 6e.ene 71-43, 00.139 <0137 00.169 00.190 <0.374 00.208 <0.223 0.162 00..9 <0.136 <0.148 01.100 <0,00 0t 0 02 Brom.... 108-66-1 <0.139 <0.137 00169 <0.190 <0.374 <0.206 <0.223 <0.162 00.149 <0.136 <0.148 <0.100 <0.100 0 NE Bromochlorornathane 7497, <0.139 03.137 00.169 00.190 <0374 <0.206 <0.223 <0.162 <0.149 <0.136 <0.148 <0.103 <0.1000,0 E ,- 0.3 &<,a 6 .<. 75-2,4 <0.139 00.137 00.169 <0.190 <0.374 <0.208 <0,23 00.162 <0.149 <0.136 <0.148 <0.100 <0100 ' ; -4 „400002 Broriro(orm 75-25-2 03.139 00.137 <0.169 <0.190 <0.374 <6208 00223 <0.162 <0.149 <0.136 <0.145 <0.100 00.100 L <<7688.1 Brornornethana 74-83-9 <0.693 <0,686 <0,844 , <0.950 <1.87 <1.04 <1.11 00.509 <0.745 <0.679 <0.70 <0.500 00.500 ,, or 11,60.04 Carbon tetrachbriba 5423, <0.139 <0.137 <0.169 <0.190 <0.374 <0.208 <0.223 <0.162 <0.149 <01 36 0.148 00.100 .100 ,..- -500508 Odoroberuene 108-90-7 <0.139 <0.137 00169 00.190 00374 <0208 <0.223 <0162 <0.149 <0.136 <0.146 43.100 <0100 ; .r.400,6.2 ChlorodibromorneMane 124-441 <0.139 <0.137 <0169 <0.190 00.374 <0.208 <0223 <0162 <0.149 <0.136 <0148 <0.100 <0100 .„ 1,.--04 444.0003 014 1< 75-00, 00,139 <0.137 <0.169 <0.190 <0.374 <0.208 <0.223 0.162 <0.149 <0.136 .148 00.100 <0100 „ ..;":,0,--0.3110.0010- Chime,onn 6,66, 0.139 <0137 <0169 <6190 <0.374 <0.208 <0.223 00162 <0.149 00.136 <0148 00.100 <0100 r ' ., ,,P002 LOA t3936, Chloromethene 74-67, 00.346 <0.343 <0.422 <0.475 00.935 <0.520 <0.557 00405 0.372 00.339 <0.371 <0.250 <0.250 ,,,,,..8.1.,.., c.-1.2-mcnio1lethene 156-542 <0.139 .1137 <0.169 .190 <0574 00.208 00.223 <0.162 <0.149 <0.136 <0.148 <0.100 <0100 : „ ,„,'- 0, ors-1.3-Dichlor8propana 10061-015 <0.139 00.137 <0169 0.190 <0.374 00.208 00223 <0162 <0.149 <0.136 <0148 <0,100 <0100 EU_fl . ' NE , DM romornethane 74-95, <0.139 00137 0169 <0.190 <0.374 <0.208 <0.223 <0.162 00.149 00.136 0.148 <0100 <0100 ,„ , 0 NE Dbhlorodifluoromethane 75-71-8 <0.139 017 <0.169 <0.190 <0.374 <0.208 <0.223 <0.162 <0.149 <0.136 00148 0100 03011201202 DEMorofluoromethane 75-43-4 <0.139 <0.137 <0.169 <0.190 00.374 00.208 00.223 <0.162 <0.149 <0.136 <0.148 <0.100 <0.100 , ,'„ - .0 NE Diethyl ether 63-47 <0.139 <0.137 0.169 <0.190 0.374 00.208 00.223 00.162 <0149 <0136 <0.148 <0.100 <0.100 Ethylbeneene 100-41-4 <0.139 8.745 <0.169 <0.190 0.892 <0.208 00.223 <0.162 00.149 <0.136 <0.148 <0,100 <0.100 L ",„,:, 1 1 Norachlembutadiene 87-68-3 00.139 <0,137 <0.169 <0.190 <0.374 <0.205 <0.223 <0.162 <0.1. <0.136 <0.148 <0.100 <0.100 1 ,',. 1 0.04 Isopropyl.... 96-62-6 00.139 <0.137 <0.169 <0.190 <0.374 <0,208 <0.223 <0.162 00.1. <0,136 <0.148 <0.100 <0.100 4... 't.,..„i ' 6.5 Methyl tert-butyl ether 1634-04-4 <0.139 <0.137 <0.169 <0,90 <0.374 00 208 00.223 <0.162 <0.1. 00136 <6148 <0.100 <0.100 11•„,,,,„,,,, Methylene Chloride 75-09-2 <0346 <0.343 43422 <0.475 <0.935 0.520 00,57 0405 <0.372 <0.339 <0.371 <0.250 <0.250 i. 1",.1.0,Scr.,' 0O2 Naphthalene 91-20-3 <0,346 0.610 <0.422 <0.475 2.74 <0.520 0.657 2.26 <0.372 0 ,„„ ,339 <0.371 <0.250 <0.250 ' 1„;; „" 40 1-Btrbilberuene 104,1-8 <0.139 90.137 <0.169 <0.190 0.890 00.208 00.223 00.162 0149 00.136 00146 <0.100 <0.100 N-1<3o73156neene 103-654 00.139 0,53 <0.169 <0.190 0.696 00.208 <0.223 00.162 00.10 00.136 00148 <0.100 <0.100 ' 222.. 1 NE p-Isopropylloluene 99-87-6 <0.139 <0.137 <0.169 <0190 0.468 <0.208 <0.223 00.152 <0.149 <0.136 <0.148 <0.100 <0.100 Lii„,„,, 4- NE se0Butylbenzene 13598-8 <0.139 <0.137 <0.169 00.190 0.445 00.208 <0.223 <0.162 <0.1. <0.136 <0.148 0.100 <0.100 i,,,,,,,„_,,..... Styrene 100-0-5 <0.139 <0.137 <0.169 <0.190 <0.374 00.209 <0.223 <0.162 <0.146 <0.136 00.1. <0.100 <0.100 , ',, tert-Butylbeneene 96-046 <0.139 <0.137 <0.169 <0.190 <0.374 <0.206 <0.223 <0.162 00.149 <0.136 00.143 <0.100 <0.100 r„„1 i,... Tetrachloroethene 127-18-4 <0.139 <0.137 <0.169 <0.193 0374 00.208 <0,23 00.162 <0.149 <0.136 <0.148 00.100 <0.100 :-- - 0001 TetrehYd/an= 109-99-9 <0.139 <0.137 00.169 <0.193 <0.374 <0.333 0.223 0162 <0.149 <0,136 00.148 00.100 <0.100 . ,d 00 440, Toluene 108-88-3 <0.139 1.28 <0.169 <0.193 <0374 <0.208 0223 <0.162 <0.1. <0.136 <0.148 00.103 00.100 t.., ..1,0. 1< As; -4, bans-1.2-00hloroothene 156-60-5 00.139 <0,137 <0.169 <0.190 <0.374 <0.208 <0.223 00.162 <0.149 <0.136 <0.148 <0.100 <0.11:0 ,,..„._,./ ,E, E 4'74011113414 trans-1.3-0ahloropropene 10061-02-6 00.139 <0.137 <0.169 <0.190 00.374 00.208 <0.223 00.1. <0.149 <0.136 <0.146 <0.100 <0.100 11,--ii,i,:- ,08-MNEW,838 TaMe 1 Ana 0.1 Resugs Eisinger Meadoses Orono MN NEXIMIIIIMMILEMEMESIMIE03311:2=31310EIESMICZOMICIEMMEERESEECEESSEMEICEMMEMMINI=111L' " 4 mNrtr, Compound/Parameter 111310-149954-1 310-1469542 310-1499543 310-149954-4 310.149954-5 310-1503642 310-1503644 310.1503643 310-150364-5 310-1503646 310-150364-7 310-1503641 310-149954-6, , ELMS IrEEIMEME=BEZEIEMIIIIMEMIEMMEli 03/01/2019 03/0.019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 03/01/2019 Emezczn_ ,4 mi=molmmornms:KEMMEKEEM=0101MMIEMMEEZZIIMEEIIMMIZIEEMOMEGIMMEEEMMEIMMMEI .0 .1. MEESTIECEGEMMIIIIIIIIIIIENEENIIIMIEEM=IMMMIEMMEIMIIIIIIEEMMMEMMESEENIMIMENIMIMEMMESZENI <0100 POT. „t• 411111111103111= EX1=27111111111•11111110:0911=1:11113111111MEEM=131MIMEMMEME1111111111:1111111111MEEM=EMEMI <4. .100 I 0 ow 1=11ELIIIIIEESMIIMEMIII =IMEINIMEEIMMEIIIMMEIMEMMIEEEMMEECIMMESEEMMEIMMMIZEIMMEIECIIIMINEEM IMESEZERICIICEINIME1111111=======EMMEIE11111111•10:11•111111313M11111211==12EIMILMEIMINIZIENIMIBEIDMICEEW41441-411111111•1111E1111111111 3=215211111111111•111111MENIMMIONIIIIMM=EMMMMLMMMMWEMWM=ME=M:=MMEMMEIEM=EINIIIIIIIIIEM4-471M1111111111111111Q111111111 motaiseassamatratunimmvanmsnommummosnamorummermimmommaxemsnEmmEamma=.. momeirmem 1=1,ZEC:EIMMEMIEMMEIEM=1211EMMOZEIMMISMIMIIMEMEMIIIICCIRIIIMIEE:=MEKEEMMEENEEIMIIMEIBMIIMMEIM 21111111111111=1 LITUTIMESEEINEE/EMMIRE==:M=MEREMMI:CIEMIIIIMEIBMNIMENIESI =3EMUMENIIMEREEMIIIMEII=MICE=: M11111111111111EMIll Cr EMNIMEMMIC131111• 401111111111111111=111111 IMREIZI11311iMMMEMMI: MLEMCEMMEISEMIMEME1=1•1:1201111111111:1EMMMECC6E1111111 31immum. :=331111IMMEESEEMMIEM crizzegallamsamimmailmmogrammanzimeasmmomnazEUmwmanim=rmErnmommiamminiv,.. Alimummine IZIEMIZIMMEEMEEM:CEEEXIMIMMIXEN11111112319111111.233EMMEMEMMIZEMMIEISM=IMWMMEMMZEMM2E11111•211=11 121=21=121iITMIE:21EMMEGIMIMISEEINIIIIIMEIMIEMMMEIMMIEIMUMMIEMMEI=MIEMMERIIIIIIMMIZMilill=1111111111111111111M111111 Dibana a h anthracene atiNEE=MEM=3121M=123MMEIZEMEMINNIIIMEMIIIIIEMENI 1111=9EC=1•1111=MiEM=MEC=IIMMECIIIIIIIICOMINIIIC63111101111117711=EMMEEMIIIIIMENNIIIIMEEMMZEMM1213111111111111.1111X710 0[1: 111:1215MIZEINIII=EIM=1:16=MIEIMINCIME1111=M3MINEEMMOEMIIMMEIBMIZIEEMMZEMMZIMINII111301111111111111111EMMI 111=EEZIMIIIMIIIIIIIIMMIMIEMEIMMEM31=MMIMIIIMIIIUMMIZIEEMMEIEMRIMMEIMICEMIIIIINZIEEMMZEMMZEMMIIIICENINOIMINIIMIIIM EM241211113193111111CITIMEMMIMEM=CEEMMIEEMME====i1E=_,—MEIDEMMIMEMMINEMMZEMMZEM0IMINICENIMI 1215111CIZIEZNICIME 0-.0 =3£1:==EOMMEIM111111:10111111=11211111WIEMINIIMMEMIEMEEEMMIE=M213111111111MICEINIMMIIIMM 133-0.0 MEMIEN=1:12==21:1==MIMIIMIED:111111.11a7MINIXEMOIM,EMMEEIMIIIIIMEN11111123EEMMMIIIIIIIIM11111111111111:1111111113 Ell=1:1111= FrIrrIiRNMEIIMMMEIM=1•119:2111111112:31M=112MMICI=1_ MEE:MIIIIIMIMMEEMMEIMMIIM11111111111111119MMIIIIIIIIIIIMME GC Samivolatile. Diesel Range Organics(ORO)wi 1111MI NE silica•el deem• STLD0143 1790 20.4 5, 857 196 9960 164 19 6 19.1 NS IMEIEBEESEEIMEMEM=IM=MEEEMIMINEIIIIIMEM1111112:162111111113: 11111M13111 00. MEEMMZE11111111111111111L74411 1111111MINE GELIZIOMIECEIMEMIMMEICEMMEIME11111111162111111111=11111MEMEMINMEMMiEMMOICIIIINCIMEIN MNinNIMZ121=111111•4_. ,111111111131111111E IMEEEIIMICIIIMialif=e2=M120==2113=MEEMM:IMEMMEIIZIMINCIERIUCEIEMMEEZEM MIIEEIMIMZEM111111111C4 41111211EMIEN GEESEIEli=:MaMZIMMEIZ==EEE==1263=1=31M=fIEMIIIIMIMEIZIMIIIIZEEEIIIIIIIEIMSMMMZEM MI1132111•1111.11M111111111 ' 1",;447,7,p, 11121189:35MOMEIMM=EIEMMIME==0651MMEIMECIMINIIIII1113111111INCEERINIIMOCEIMME=1111 <0.8610 GEMECIMI1111111111111111MWIIICOMMIMECIZEINIMIXIIMMELEIMME11===1111111MNIMEIEEM =MEM111111=31•1111111110_-__ 0:3IIIIIII—'7MICOMEMEIMEMEISIMM <0 0,07 ME61:1= 0•9702 1111:11=.1231EM <00630 =MEM ..10 IMEIII11111111211111111111111111ET*4 1:2131111EZZINIVIEREMMIMMECEMINII =00T, IMICRIEIMMIEM .00630 =CUM MIEMMZEMIIIIIIIMMEMININEE111111111 G=E==IEE=IM::=M=DEEMIIIrg32:11.1111MMI"L ./MmeMEIF=malaMEMEMI <00610 IMIEM MZEMIIIIMI , 811111131111111. LIZEia=2g=:Efa==ZEMM::IE:==:EIZM=:EIM=EEERM=IEEMIMIISEM=MMMIEI= EEIMMZIEMII IMEIZZIME1=Ell11II: =ESE=MOCEMMIIK=MIE03111111111=M11111•11132:=1=Ell==a1=MIEMMEEM ECIWZIMIZEUIMl5lIMIKEIMINICIEGIIIIIMCIEEMONIZEZINIMMEM3:11=MEIMMEIEIMMIIIIIMEISIMIMIEM=110111111.. .4444 11112EMB111111121=11111W1:111111111111EMININIIIM11111111E=WIEW;1:1,1.4.4i`41-1:,-- _ 4312:=-': .MMICEEMMIEIMMC513:11111111MAIN IMMERIZEIMEI=IBM=IEM=ZEIC==1113=!134MMIli =E1:17=EIM=FAEM=ENIMMIEMMIEM,_ -4 .4 EIRSEEZMI=ES==11EMMICEIEZ11111111111:9ERMIMMENIIIIIIMEMMEIMMI=EIMINIMITOINIIIIIZELEXIIIMEMIIIIIIICEM, 1=16FLIZIESIMZEMMZEMIIIII61111•1 FIENE1=311111111=EIMEONIIIIIIIMIMmmmommengum aa. IMEZE=MM=MEIO=MZE=MEZIMIL&" Ismazmai Notes NT=Not tested NE=Not Established NS=Not Sampled <=Less than Me reporting lima Bold=detected concentration Table 2 Groundwater Analytical Results Eisinger Meadows Orono,MN B-2 0-3 B-4 0-5 B-10 Trip Blank MN-DOH Compound/Parameter CAS No. 310-149954-8 310-149954-9310-149954-1.0310-149954-11 310-150364-8 310-149954-7 HumanHlth 02/21/2019 02/21/2019 02/21/2019 02/21/2019 03/01/2019 02/21/2019 WaterGuid 2016 Volatiles(ug/L) . 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 630-20-6 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 70 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 71-55-6 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 9000_.c-„s, 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 79-34-5 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 2 ,i.,: 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 79-00-5 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 3 ;; 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane 76-13-1 <2.00 <2.00 <2.00 <2.00 <2.00 <2.00 <,200000 1,1-Dichloroethane 75-34-3 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 80 1,1-Dichloroethene 75-35-4 <2.00 <2.00 <2.00 <2.00 <2.00 <2.00 200 ; 1,1-Dichloropropene 563-58-6 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 87-61-6 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 NE-,,'+' =z 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 96-18-4 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 T 0.003 ., 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120-82-1 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 14 4 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 95-63-6 <1.00 17.1 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 (' 100 '", 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 96-12-8 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 Ar; NE,, '' 1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) 106-93-4 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <'< 0.004 _^ 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 <1.00 4.06 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 600 ; 1,2-Dichloroethane 107-06-2 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 1 'l-, 1,2-Dichloropropane 78-87-5 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 5 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 108-67-8 <1.00 5.73 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 100 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 541-73-1 <1.00 2.18 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 NE 1,3-Dichloropropane 142-28-9 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 INE: 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 106-46-7 <1.00 6.54 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 A0. ;, 2,2-Dichloropropane 594-20-7 <4.00 <4.00 <4.00 <4.00 <4.00 <4.00 NE ;.''' 2-Butanone(MEK) 78-93-3 <10.0 <10.0 <10.0 <10.0 <10.0 <10.0 4000 ;a/. 2-Chlorotoluene 95-49-8 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 NE `. 4-Chlorotoluene 106-43-4 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 NE 4:-CIS 4-Methy1-2-pentanone(MIBK) 108-10-1 <10.0 <10.0 <10.0 <10.0 <10.0 <10.0 300 '',° Acetone 67-64-1 <10.0 11.9 <10.0 <10.0 <10.0 <10.0 4000 ' Allyl chloride 107-05-1 <2.00 <2.00 <2.00 <2.00 <2.00 <2.00 30 Benzene 71-43-2 <0.500 3.24 <0.500 <0.500 <0.500 <0.500 2'`. Bromobenzene 108-86-1 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 NE. Bromochloromethane 74-97-5 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 NE Bromodichloromethane 75-27-4 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 B Bromoform 75-25-2 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 '407'... ..1,;,'; Bromomethane 74-83-9 <4.00 <4.00 <4.00 <4.00 <4.00 <4.00 10 Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 <2.00 <2.00 <2.00 <2.00 <2.00 <2.00 1 Chlorobenzene 108-90-7 <1.00 3.04 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 t: 100 Chlorodibromomethane 124-48-1 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 '310 Chloroethane 75-00-3 <4.00 <4.00 <4.00 <4.00 <4.00 <4.00 ',, NE Chloroform 67-66-3 <3.00 <3.00 <3.00 <3.00 <3.00 <3.00 30 Chloromethane 74-87-3 <3.00 <3.00 <3.00 <3.00 <3.00 <3.00 NE ds-1,2-Dichloroethene 156-59-2 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 6 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-01-5 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 _ 'NE Dibromomethane 74-95-3 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 z< ;_,'NE Dichlorodifluoromethane 75-71-8 <3.00 <3.00 <3.00 <3.00 <3.00 <3.00 `°`:.:700' Dichlorofluoromethane 75-43-4 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 30 Diethyl ether 60-29-7 16.2 <2.00 <2.00 <2.00 <2.00 <2.00 !' X00 ;,,: Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 <1.00 3.98 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 Hexachlorobutadiene 87-68-3 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 1 Isopropylbenzene 98-82-8 <1.00 1.51 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 300 Methyl tert-butyl ether 1634-04-4 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 60 Methylene Chloride 75-09-2 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 5 Naphthalene 91-20-3 <5.00 6.29 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 70 n-Butylbenzene 104-51-8 <1.00 1.09 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 NE .v:= N-Propylbenzene 103-65-1 <1.00 2.16 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 NE ,- p-Isopropyltoluene 99-87-6 <1.00 5.33 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 NE <' sec-Butylbenzene 135-98-8 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 `: NE, ,. Styrene 100-42-5 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 NE ;, ;C Cert-Butylbenzene 98-06-6 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 NE ,,,- Tetrachloroethene 127-18-4 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 Tetrahydrofuran 109-99-9 <10.0 <10.0 <10.0 <10.0 <10.0 <10.0 600 Toluene 108-88-3 <1.00 2.08 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 200 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 156-60-5 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 40 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-02-6 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 NE Trichloroethene 79-01-6 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 0.4 Trichlorofluoromethane 75-69-4 <4.00 <4.00 <4.00 <4.00 <4.00 <4.00 2000 Vinyl chloride 75-01-4 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 0.2 Xylenes,Total 1330-20-7 <3.00 20.1 <3.00 <3.00 <3.00 <3.00 300 Table 2 Groundwater Analytical Results Eisinger Meadows Orono,MN B-2 B-3 B-4 B-5 B-10 Trip Blank MN-DOH Compound/Parameter CAS No. 310-149954-8 310-149954-9 310-149954-10010-149954-11 310-150364-8 310-149954-7 HumanHlth 02/21/2019 02/21/2019 02/21/2019 02/21/2019 03/01/2019 02/21/2019 WaterGuid 2016 GC Volatiles(ug/L) > ..; ,` „-: ;t' '-, Wisconsin GRO I STL01887 I <100 I <100 I <100 I <100 I <100 I <100 I NE Semivolatiles(ug/L) ,.', -t.:, 1;. 2-Methylnaphthalene 91-57-6 <1.12 <1.06 <1.05 <1.05 <1.20 NS , 8 Acenaphthene 83-32-9 <1.12 2.94 <1.05 <1.05 <1.20 NS 100 ' ac Acenaphthylene 208-96-8 <1.12 <1.06 <1.05 <1.05 <1.20 NS NE ,. Anthracene 120-12-7 <1.12 1.69 <1.05 <1.05 <1.20 NS 2000:m- Benzo[a]anthracene 56-55-3 <1.12 2.67 <1.05 <1.05 <1.20 NS "NE'-',1':- Benzo[a]pyrene NE _1Benzo[a]pyrene 50-32-8 <1.12 2.08' <1.05 <1.05 <1.20 NS 0.06 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 205-99-2 <1.12 2.91 <1.05 <1.05 <1.20 NS NE Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 191-24-2 <1.12 1.25 <1.05 <1.05 <1.20 NS NE- .' Benzo[k]fluoranthene 207-08-9 <1.12 1.27 <1.05 <1.05 <1.20 NS NE Chrysene 218-01-9 <1.12 3.94 <1.05 <1.05 <1.20 NS NE Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 53-70-3 <1.12 <1.06 <1.05 <1.05 <1.20 NS NE Fluoranthene 206-44-0 <1.12 7.79 <1.05 <1.05 <1.20 NS 70 Fluorene 86-73-7 <1.12 2.34 <1.05 <1.05 <1.20 NS ,_300 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 193-39-5 <1.12 1.35 <1.05 <1.05 <1.20 NS `INE Naphthalene 91-20-3 <5.62 5.64 <5.26 <5.26 <6.02 NS 70 Phenanthrene 85-01-8 <1.12 6.18 <1.05 <1.05 <1.20 NS NE Pyrene 129-00-0 <1.12 5.85 <1.05 <1.05 <1.20 NS 50 GC Semivolatiles(ug/L.) ', e, Diesel Range Organics(DRO)w/ <120 581 204 175 <128 NS silica gel cleanup STL00143 NE Dissolved Metals'(mg/L) Arsenic 7440-38-2 0.00898 <0.00200 0.00253 <0.00200 <0.00200 NS ..4 . 0.018 Barium 7440-39-3 0.893 0.784 0.207 0.484 0.360 NS 2 Cadmium 7440-43-9_ <0.000500 <0.000500 <0.000500 <0.000500 <0.000500 NS 0.0005 _Chromium 7440-47-3 <0.00500 <0.00500 <0.00500 <0.00500 <0.00500 NS 0.1° Lead 7439-92-1 <0.000500 <0.000500 <0.000500 0.000580 <0.000500 NS 0.015` Mercury 7439-97-6 <0.000200 <0.000200 <0.000200 <0.000200 <0.000200 NS 0.002' Selenium 7782-49-2 <0.00500 <0.00500 <0.00500 <0.00500 <0.00500 NS 0.03 Silver 7440-22-4 <0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00100 NS 0.03, Notes: NE=Not Established NS=Not Sampled <=Less than the reporting limit Bold=detected concentration Exceedance a=EPA Maximum Contaminate Limit b=HRL for Chromium VI c=EPA Maxiumum Contaminate Limit at the tap Table 3-Soil Vapor Analtyical Results Eisinger Meadows 111=1:1EZZIE2211111=11112211IEMIIMEMEICEIMICEIMECIZZIIMECIIIIIMICEMZIIMZIEMEI : .!-,31 Orono,MN Sample Identifier and Date Collected CompoundrParameter �» Resdential lSV CAS N. ®®®®®®®®®®®®®®® R�n Volatile Organic Canpountls Method TO-15 mported in ug�m3 1,1,1-Triddorcethane ®®m®®®®®®®®®®®®® „i<e 165,003 1,1,2,2-TetraMbroethace �mm®mmmmmmmmmmmm®.-`,^:c` 1.12-Tritlrlorcethane • ®®m®®®®®®®®®®®®® .':;s..., 1,1-DiWoroelhane SEM mm®mm®mmmmmm' mm®mLr�. A 76.500 1,1-0iWoroethene �mm®mmmmmmmm®���®€ yl=:;:',. 6,6M NEEMIIIIMEIREIMISINIMEMIIIIMMINEIMMENEMMENNEINESSMENNEMESERIPMEMMINE1111MIE1111 EEZIEMENEEN was Emmons Raz mannimeisectsmennmaz Nam 1,2-Dibromoethace '®' ®®m®®®® 12-DiWoraberizene ®®m®®®MEM®®®®®®®m® 6,600, 1,2-DlUiloroethene �mm®mmmmmmmm ,{':;���� r 12-OlMloroproparie • mm®mmmmmmmmmmmm m ® 1,2-Dlchlorotetraduoromethace EMENmmmmmMIN®' m®'' EI EE ®' mmmm®® mm�mmmmmmmmmmm:. _Lmimesm 111= 01=11, 'Till 45.52nlittiliBEEMISEIREZ, EOM iiitir.i.:MIZEINISIN EMI ElEarallIESIIIIII 1.3DiWoroberlxene mE®®m®®®®®®®®®®®m MEM ® 1,4Dichlaroberizen< r®' ®®m®®®®®®®®®®®m®j ®'' ECM®®mmmm®mm®®®mm®® , .. 165.003 mmmm mmmmmmmmmmm MN".„._• .1,000 672464 mm®mmmmmmmmmmmm .90 ®® mmm m mmm mmmmm m0 000 mmmm®' ®' m®' mmmmm®' m® 1.02_X1 MICENIIIIMITIM MEM illOINIENEEMMICIIIIMEIMIENCIO®® eromoaiworomenwneMEITIMIENNIZEREI MEM®®NEB®®®®®®®MEN® -. ";. 6romomm, ®®®WEE®®®®®®®®®®®WEENIE 'a.'.'... canon aisulrae EZIEMNIEMMEMEEINEIMMINm11112®mEMMIEMNIMENIMMIENZM®u` '.... carbon tevambdee • ®®EIM®®®MIZZEN!DEEM®®®®ESIZ® . *r:,'I. chloroberizene 10&90-7 ®” ®®®®®®®®®®®m®®m® 33.060 CMorofarm • ■mmmmmmmmmmmmmmSa:. ' ® vav9.ei cnleromemane 1111122111111111111131111111IMIMEN 111101111EN11111:1111111111a111111:1111111111111131X1111121111111 ®® ' ds-1,2-Dichbroethece tmEmm®maneENEENemsezoritinEmemamezmezomm® -_--,,... cis-1,3DichbroPropene 0061-015 mmmm mmmm mmm mMEM NEE MEM m €+ e �m®mmmmmmmm®' mmm®" 0.69 .196,000 Dmromonbromemane ®®EIM Elan®®®®®®®®MIN MEM®® ,... :: ® Ditl �m®m®®m®®®mmmm®m® AZO 6,600u11211211mmmmmmmmmmmmOmm®r495.593 immammezzioscontourtuissolicermoseenzesommecomseamsezzameenumenstir 99,000 mmmmmZEN MEI mmmmmmm®' m'€. 1.000 owns ®®m®®®®®®®®®®®m®:. 30,000 990.000 Mexachlorobutadiene 1117".®®m®®®®®®®®®®®m® iwProp.1 alcohol �m©mmi mmmm mmmmmmm®yc 7.000 231,000 Table 3-Soil Vapor Analtyical Results Eisinger Meadows Orono,MN Sample Identifier and Date Collected vR ®®®mmm®mmm®®®®®— ` LompoundTarameter #' �[�tdentlalISV CAS 1111111111111111111111111.1111111111119"3 R�H ..,.. ®®it 1111®mm®®®®®® •,,i ® e.°„ '' 3300• ramEzzomasemmemmossommlimanNENEENNENNIENNENEummuninummEENL-.C.,'e 21000 --m®®®-----®—®m— 24." �������mmmmmmm mmm av 11113111111112Z EIMMEEMENEEMETEMIN ECM E.:A11111 ME= —mm' EE m®' mmmmmm®' ®m ® >••.2o00 66.000 —m®' mm mm®" mmmmm NEMmmm'..'. 3.000 99" 111171EMEIREINNIEN mm mmmEINEM Eli mmmm:=.:.. 1000 33.000 III21!IM!11EMIIEMEEM MINmm mm mmm m- 10590-9 mmm m m mm WO m mmm mmm®®® •11211111111111111, —®mmm®®®®®®®m®®EINEM 6.1100 160,o00 t2ns,.2-Dichloroetherte ®mm®mmmm m mmm®' mm mm©i m_ trer�t 3-Dichlotopropen, 10061-026 mmm mm mmmmmmmmm—m111101111 —®11011111®11—®ESIMIM.;®:'`;rL'®—®®®M1631111 rnchloronuoromethaneMEM®®�®®®®®®Om®®® ®" mmmmmm mmmmmm®m 1 6.600 ISMIZEIMIENNEN118111111201,13111118MIIME ' T711111MIEM IMIEZIMMIZEZIMMIIE111113111111:1111111MIN mm mmmm KEW .Mtn Methane by Metlrotl EPA 3C reported iu',s vN Methane 1:1:131C32112121®1112:11 Ob8 CCM=_ CIZIM _._:`.EICIC131112211=1 a..M,__ Hydrogen Sulfide by Method EPA 15_16 reported in pain vv Hydrogen Sulfide m '®' mrammisramerimeasemietrirminrmentistom®-......._...:......e.® 1313!1111111111111114Gas Meter Results --m---o©oma—mm—©m—®® Hydrogen Sulfide(H2SI Meter Residts omooNM!MEM ooMIN om-1111 Notes: NM=Not measured due to tight soils and meter pump alarm ppm=parts per million ISV=Intrusion screening value LEL=Lower explosive limit vocs=volatile organic compounds µg/m'=micrograms per cubic meter NE=Not Established %v/v=percent volume by volume <7.9=Not Detected above laboratory reporting limits '=based on total xylenes cast N 133620.7 =Interim ISV value Appendix A Remedial Investigation Report (Wenck, March 2019) WENCK File #85503-0003 March 2019 Remedial Investigation Report Eisinger Meadows 3245 Wayzata Boulevard W. Orono, Minnesota 55356 MPCA Project No. VP11342 Prepared for: La kewest, LLC 14525 Highway 7 Suite 265 Minnetonka, MN 55345 lr�T Prepared by: WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. WENCK1800 Pioneer Creek Center Maple Plain, MN 55359 Responsive partner. Phone: 763-479-4200 Exceptional outcomes. Fax: 763-479-4242 Table of Contents 1.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE 1-1 1.1 Scope of Services 1-1 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 2-1 2.1 Current Use of Adjoining Properties 2-1 2.2 Physical Setting 2-2 2.2.1 Topography 2-2 2.2.2 Geology 2-2 2.2.3 Hydrogeology 2-2 3.0 PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTS 3-1 3.1 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Haugo Geotechnical Services, LLC, October 2014 3-1 3.2 Soil borings Performed By Haugo Geotechncial Services, LLC and Test Pits by Lake West Excavating, LLC, 2014/2015 3-1 3.3 Test Pit Sampling Data Report, Wenck Associates, Inc., June 2015 3-2 3.4 Drilling Investigation Report, Minnesota Department of Transportation, State Trunk Highway 12, Long Lake, MN. EnecoTech Midwest, Inc. October 9, 20023-3 3.5 Phase II Environmental Site Assessment, Howard Eisinger Property, 3245 West Wayzata Boulevard, Orono, MN. GME Consultants, Inc., April 13, 1999. 3-4 4.0 INVESTIGATION METHODS AND PROCEDURES 4-1 4.1 Field Investigation Rationale 4-1 4.2 Soil investigation 4-1 4.3 Groundwater Investigation 4-2 4.4 Soil Vapor Investigation 4-3 5.0 INVESTIGATION RESULTS 5-5 5.1 Soil 5-5 5.1.1 Geology 5-5 5.1.2 Soil Analytical Results 5-5 5.2 Groundwater 5-7 5.2.1 Hydrogeology 5-7 5.2.2 Groundwater Analytical Results 5-7 5.3 Soil Vapor 5-7 6.0 DISCUSSION 6-1 6.1 Soil Discussion 6-1 6.2 Groundwater discussion 6-2 6.3 Soil Vapor 6-2 7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION 7-1 7.1 Conclusions 7-1 7.2 Recommendations 7-1 9 WENCK March 2019 I Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. \\woodbury-dc1\Woodbury\Technical\5503 Lake West\02-Work Plan\Eisinger Meadows Investigation Report MAR 2019\Eisinger Investigation Report 2019.docx Table of Contents (Cont. ) FIGURES 1 Site Location Map 2 Site Detail Map 3 Preliminary Plat 4 Site and Landscaping Plan 5 Historical Boring Locations Map 6 Boring Locations and Extent of Landfill and Fill Soils Map (Old Site Plan) 7 Boring Locations and Extent of Landfill and Fill Soils Map (Current Site Plan) TABLES 1 Soil Analytical Results 2 Groundwater Analytical Results 3 Soil Vapor Analytical Results APPENDICES A Soil Boring Logs and Soil Vapor Sampling Forms B Laboratory Reports and Chain-of Custody Documentation v YWENCK March 2019 Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. \\woodbury-dcl\Woodbury\Technical\5503 Lake West\02-Work Plan\Eisinger Meadows Investigation Report MAR 2019\Eisinger Investigation Report 2019.docx 1 . 0 Purpose and Scope Wenck Associates, Inc. (Wenck) was authorized by Lakewest, LLC to prepare this Remedial Investigation Report (RI) for environmental investigation activities at the proposed Eisigner Meadows redevelopment site. This property is historically known as the Eisigner Landfill located at 3245 Wayzata Boulevard West in Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota (the Site). The Site consists of approximately 29 acres and is in the NE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 32, Township 118 North, Range 23 West. The Site can be identified by property tax parcels 32- 118-23-14-0001 and 0002. The Site location is depicted in Figure 1. A Site Detail Map of the Subject Property is included as Figure 2. A preliminary plat of the Site is included as Figure 3 and the current site and landscape plan are included as Figure 4. On September 23, 2015, Lakewest, LLC received a No Association Determination (NAD) Letter from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) for known impacts at the Site. The NAD outlined four specific conditions. The fourth condition states; "Due to insufficient Site data, a work plan for further characterization of the Site shall be submitted by Lakewest for MPCA approval prior to development of a RAP (Response Action Plan). The RAP shall be submitted prior to redevelopment of the Site for MPCA approval." A Work Plan and a revised Work Plan were submitted to the MPCA for review and comment in February 2017 and February 2019, respectively. The revised Work Plan was approved by the MPCA, with comments, via email was received on February 20, 2019. This RI summarizes the investigation work outlined in the revised Work Plan and comments in the MPCA approval email. This RI will be submitted to the MPCA Brownfields Program for review and approval prior to submitting the RAP. This Work Plan will be referenced under MPCA Project Number VP11342. The purpose of the RI activities described herein was to define the nature and extent of previously-identified impacts at the Site. As mentioned above, previous environmental activities are summarized in Section 3.0 of this report. 1.1 SCOPE OF SERVICES This following scope of services was completed for this Remedial Investigation: A Cleared public and private utilities; A Completed 10 soil borings to assess current soil and groundwater conditions; A Completed 15 soil vapor probes to assess soil vapor conditions; A Observed and collected soil samples recovered from the soil borings, created soil boring logs, and field-screened soil for the presence of volatile organics with a photoionization detector (PID); A Collected a total of 11 soil samples for analysis of diesel range organics (DRO) with silica gel cleanup, gasoline range organics (GRO), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) metals and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs); A Collected five groundwater samples for analysis of DRO with silica gel cleanup, GRO, VOCs, dissolved RCRA metals, PAHs and PCBs; v^vWENCK March 2019 1-1 Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. \\woodbury-dcl\Woodbury\Technical\5503 Lake West\02-Work Plan\Eisinger Meadows Investigation Report MAR 2019\Eisinger Investigation Report 2019.docx • Collected 15 soil vapor samples for VOC analysis by Method TO-15 and methane analysis by Method EPA 3C; • Collected 13 soil vapor samples for hydrogen sulfide analysis by method EPA 15_16; • Field screened 15 soil vapor samples with a PID and 4-gas meter; and A Prepared this report. v^vWENCK March 2019 1-2 Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. \\woodbury-dcl\Woodbury\Technical\5503 Lake West\02-Work Plan\Eisinger Meadows Investigation Report MAR 2019\Eisinger Investigation Report 2019.docx 2.0 Site Description The Subject Property is located in a rural area in Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Address: 3245 Wayzata Boulevard West City: Orono Site County: Hennepin State: Minnesota Address/Location Township: Range: Section: 118 North 23 West 32 Size: 29 acres Property Property Identification Numbers: Information 32-118-23-14-0001; 32-118-23-14-0002 Improvements The Subject Property consists of two parcels. The smaller of the two parcels (3.2 acres) is occupied by a single-family home and a garage. Current Use: The Site is currently vacant. The single-family home has not been occupied for several years. Use of the Property Past Use: Approximately 12-acres of parcel 32-118-23-14-0002 was used as a sanitary landfill between 1958 and 1972 with additional fill material placed on top through 1993. The remaining acreage is wetland and wood land. Current Ownership & Operation: Ownership and Operation of the The Site is currently owned by Lakewest, LLC. Property The Site location is depicted in Figure 1. A Site Detail Map showing the Site boundaries is provided in Figure 2. 2.1 CURRENT USE OF ADJOINING PROPERTIES The following land uses were noted on adjoining properties: Direction Description North Unimproved land, single-family residence and Lake Classen beyond Wayzata Boulevard West South T.H. 12 and unimproved land East Unimproved Land West Unimproved Land �^�WENCK March 2019 2-1 Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. \\woodbury-dcl\Woodbury\Technical\5503 Lake West\02-Work Plan\Eisinger Meadows Investigation Report MAR 2019\Eisinger Investigation Report 2019.docx 2.2 PHYSICAL SETTING 2.2.1 Topography The wooded area of the Site along Wayzata Boulevard has an elevation of 1,012 feet above mean sea level (msl). The elevation decreases to the south towards the wetland to an elevation of 976 feet above msl. The elevation decreases from 1,012 feet above msl to the west towards the landfill area to an elevation of 996 feet above msl. The topography of the landfill area slopes slightly to the south-southwest to an elevation of 986 feet. The west and east sides of the landfill drop steeply to an approximate elevation of 975 feet above msl. Historic filling on the west side of the Site is evident. 2.2.2 Geology According to the Haugo Geotechnical Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Haugo, 2014), the surficial geology at the Site is characterized by two distinct surficial geological groups which include loamy till and post glacial organic deposits (swamps or wetlands). Bedrock in the vicinity of the Site consists of the Jordan Sandstone Formation which is comprised of quartzose sandstone. The depth to bedrock is approximately 250 to 300 feet below the ground surface (Haugo, 2014). 2.2.3 Hydrogeology The general direction of regional groundwater flow in the area of the Site is noted to the south-southeast toward the Minnesota and Mississippi River systems (Haugo, 2014). Groundwater Local conditions may vary due to surface water features, perched groundwater conditions or artificially created drainage systems. The Site's surficial groundwater table is at an elevation of approximately 960 feet above msl corresponding to approximately 25 feet below grade (Haugo, 2014). ' WENCK March 2019 2-2 Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. \\woodbury-dcl\Woodbury\Technical\5503 Lake West\02-Work Plan\Eisinger Meadows Investigation Report MAR 2019\Eisinger Investigation Report 2019.docx 3 . 0 Previous Environmental Reports 3.1 PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT, HAUGO GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES, LLC, OCTOBER 2014 A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) was completed by Haugo Geotechnical Services, LLC, (Haugo) dated October 9, 2014 (Haugo, 2014). During the preparation of the Phase I ESA, Haugo learned the Site was listed in the EDR Radius Map Report for the following databases: the Site Remediation Section (SRS), Minnesota List of Sites and Open Landfill Inventory (MN LS), State Institutional Control database (INST CONTROL), Spills database (SPILLS), and Voluntary Investigation and Cleanup Program (MPCA VIC). A review of records reasonably obtainable for the Site indicated that about 12-acres of the Site was operated as a sanitary landfill between 1958 to 1972 with additional fill placed on top of the waste through 1993. According to the Haugo Phase I ESA, specific types and quantities of wastes buried within the landfill are unknown. During the 2014 site visit, a variety of materials were noted near the surface, including household trash, metal, concrete, asphalt, wood, bricks, paper, and car parts. It was noted in the EDR Radius Map Report that eight barrels of an unknown liquid were abandoned on the Site in 1992. It was reported that six of the barrels had spilled onto the ground. Documents provided during the Phase I ESA indicated land-use restrictions on the Site. A Conditional Use Permit dated May 7, 1987 by the City of Orono stated that no buildings can be constructed within the landfill area. The past use of the Site as a sanitary landfill was considered a Historical Recognized Environmental Condition (HREC) in the Phase I ESA report. 3.2 SOIL BORINGS PERFORMED BY HAUGO GEOTECHNCIAL SERVICES, LLC AND TEST PITS BY LAKE WEST EXCAVATING, LLC, 2014/2015 In August 2014, Haugo installed eight soil borings at the Site. Three soil borings SB-1 thru SB-3 were drilled on the east parcel and the remaining five were drilled near the landfill area. Debris was encountered in soil borings SB-6 and SB-7: SB-6: Sandy lean clay (Fill) to seven feet below grade (bg). Silty sand and sandy lean clay with pieces of glass, plastic, wood, and metal were encountered from 7 to 14 feet bg. The debris was underlain by sandy lean clay to 31 feet bg. SB-7: Sandy lean clay (Fill) to approximately 1.5 feet. Silty sand (Fill) encountered to 12 feet bg. Concrete pieces noted at 10 feet. Sandy lean clay encountered to the end of the boring at 31 feet. Pieces of plastic and glass encountered from 12 to 15 feet below grade. In September and October 2015, Haugo installed 29 additional borings at the Site to define the northern and northeastern limits of the landfill (borings SB-1 through SB-29). Based on the 29 soil boring logs provided to Wenck by Lakewest, LLC, soil borings SB-4, SB-7, SB-16, SB-19, SB-20, SB-21, SB-22, SB-23, and SB-27 have encountered debris. Locations of the v^YWENCK March 2019 3-1 Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. \\woodbury-dc1\Woodbury\Technical\5503 Lake West\02-Work Plan\Eisinger Meadows Investigation Report MAR 2019\tssinger Investigation Report 2019.docx soil borings are included on Figure 5. The soil borings that encountered debris are summarized below: SB-4: Lean clay (Fill) in upper four feet. Sandy clay with metal, glass, and wood from four to nine feet below grade (bg). Debris layer underlain by sandy lean clay to 21 feet bg. SB-7: Sandy lean clay (Fill) to 19 feet bg.. Pieces of concrete encountered at 15 feet, creosote-like odors also encountered at 15 feet bg. Sandy lean clay from 19 to 26 feet bg. SB-16: Silty sand (Fill) to four feet bg. Organic silt with wood and roots to 16 feet bg. Organic silt underlain by sandy lean clay to 21 feet bg. SB-19: Clayey silty sand (Fill) to four feet bg. Silty sand to 14 feet, concrete and wood encountered at 10 feet. Organic silt encountered at 14 to 19 feet bg. Sandy silt from 19 to 21 feet. SB-20: Silty sand and sandy lean clay (Fill) to 21 feet. Wire encountered at 10 feet, carpet encountered at 15 feet. SB-21: Silty sand encountered in upper foot. Sandy lean clay encountered between one and four feet bg. Silty sand found between four and 19 feet with glass and plastic at 10 feet. Sandy lean clay encountered from 19 to 21 feet bg. SB-22: Sandy lean clay (Fill) encountered in upper four feet. Silty sand layer between four and nine feet. Poorly graded sand to 14 feet with concrete, brick, and gravel. Silty sand with glass and plastic from 14 to 19 feet bg. Sandy lean clay encountered to 21 feet. SB-23: Sandy lean clay (Fill) encountered to nine feet bg. Silty sand with bituminous and concrete pieces to 19 feet. Sandy lean clay encountered to 21 feet. In June 2015, Lakewest Excavating conducted approximately 48 test pits on the property. Visual observance of the test pits revealed a sandy clay cover ranging in thickness from approximately 5 to 15 feet over waste. The test pits were not logged during excavation. The test pits were located within the known boundaries of the landfill. Locations of the test pits are included on Figure 5. The figure also includes the test pit surface elevation and bottom elevation. 3.3 TEST PIT SAMPLING DATA REPORT, WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC., JUNE 2015 In 2015, Wenck was contracted by Lakewest, LLC to conduct soil sampling activities at the Site. Lake West Excavating, LLC had already excavated approximately 48 test pits in the area of the former landfill. Wenck selected four test pits across the site to be sampled. The soil samples were collected within the waste layer and analyzed for Total Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) metals, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and diesel range organics (DRO). Each of the 48 test pits showed evidence of landfilled material consisting of municipal solid waste construction demolition waste. As mentioned in Section 3.2, the waste material was capped by approximately 5 to 15 feet of sandy clay fill in all of the test pits. WWENCK March 2019 3-2 Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. \\woodbury-del\Woodbury\Technical\5503 Lake West\02-Work Plan\Eisinger Meadows Investigation Report MAR 2019\Eisinger Investigation Report 2019.docx Wenck compared the analytical data results to the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's (MPCA's) Residential Soil Reference Values (SRVs). In general, the test pit soil sample data showed concentrations of arsenic and lead above Residential SRVs. The Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) for lead concentrations showed a non-hazardous characteristic. In the VOC analysis, methylene chloride was detected above laboratory detection limits in all four soil samples. However, the concentrations were below Residential SRVs. Methylene chloride was detected above the Tier I Soil Leaching Value (SLV) of 0.017 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) in three of the four collected samples. Low levels of PAHs were detected in two of the four test pit samples. No individual PAHs were identified above their respective SRVs or SLVs. PCB Arochlor 1254 was detected in one test pit sample. There is no established regulatory limit for PCB Arochlor 1254. Total reported PCBs were above the MPCA SLV of 0.13 mg/kg in test pit TP-2 (6') and above the Residential SRV in TP-3 (5'). Low levels of DRO were detected in all four soil samples, however, the concentrations were below the MPCA's unregulated soil reuse guidance of 100 mg/kg. 3.4 DRILLING INVESTIGATION REPORT, MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, STATE TRUNK HIGHWAY 12, LONG LAKE, MN. ENECOTECH MIDWEST, INC. OCTOBER 9, 2002. In 2000 and 2001, EnecoTech drilled on the southern edge of the Site to investigate potential impacts to soil and groundwater within the construction limits of the realignment of Trunk Highway (TH) 12 in Long Lake, MN. TH 12 adjoins the Site to the south. Five borings SB-1 thru SB-4 were drilled on the southern portion of the Eisinger Property and 6 borings SB-5 thru SB-11 were drilled at and within the construction limits. For the purposes of this Work Plan, we have used data from soil borings SB-1 thru SB-4. Soil boring logs for borings SB-1 thru SB-4 showed organic-rich clay (fill) to depths ranging between 12 and 18 feet bg. Debris such as scrap metal, glass, wood, and plastic were observed within the fill material. The fill and debris layers were underlain by peat to a depth of at least 20 feet bg. Groundwater was encountered at 12 feet bg. One to four soil samples were collected from each boring and analyzed for VOCs, GRO, DRO, RCRA metals, PCBs, SVOCs, PAHs, and pesticides. BTEX constituents were detected above laboratory method detection limits in two samples from boring SB-3. Benzene was the only constituent that exceed the MPCA SRVs or SLVs (SB-3 (18 to 20')). Concentrations of GRO were detected above laboratory method detection limits in soil samples SB-3 and SB-4. DRO concentrations were detected above laboratory method detection limits in soil samples collected from soil borings SB-1 thru SB-4. Maximum concentrations were detected in boring SB-3. Several RCRA metals were detected at concentrations exceeding respective SRVs and SLVs. VOCs were detected in each of the soil samples collected. Soil samples collected from borings SB-3 and SB-4 had one or more VOC above the SRVs and/or SLVs. PCBs were detected in borings SB-1 thru SB-4. Aroclor 1242 was the only PCB detected above the MPCA SLV and SRV in boring SB-2. 1^TWENCK March 2019 3-3 Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. \\woodbury-dcl\Woodbury\Technical\5503 Lake West\02-Work Plan\Eisinger Meadows Investigation Report MAR 2019\Eisinger Investigation Report 2019.docx SVOCs and/or PAH concentrations were detected above the laboratory detection limits in borings SB-1 thru SB-4. Soil samples from SB-2, SB-3, and SB-4 showed PAH concentration above MPCA SLVs and SRVs. Pesticides were not detected in any of the analyzed soil samples. Groundwater samples showed detectable levels of GRO and DRO in borings SB-1 thru SB-4. No VOCs were reported above applicable Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Health Risk Limits (HRLs), the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) Maximum Contaminant levels (MCLS) and MDH Health-Based Values (HBVs). There were no metal or SVOC concentrations above applicable drinking water standards in borings SB-1 thru SB-4. Groundwater samples were also analyzed for PCBs, pesticides, and dioxin. None of these constituents were detected in the collected groundwater samples. A map showing the soil boring locations from this investigation are included in on Figure 5. 3.5 PHASE II ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT, HOWARD EISINGER PROPERTY, 3245 WEST WAYZATA BOULEVARD, ORONO, MN. GME CONSULTANTS, INC., APRIL 13, 1999. The purpose of this Phase II ESA was to investigate for the possible presence of subsurface impacts related to the former landfill and at the heating oil tank near the house at the Howard Eisinger property. Twelve soil borings were conducted at the Site and soil and groundwater samples were collected for laboratory analyses. A mobile laboratory was used to analyze select soil and groundwater samples for VOCs, GRO, and DRO. One soil and one groundwater sample from each boring was collected and analyzed for RCRA metals, PAHs, PCBs, and pesticides. Based on the preliminary results from the mobile lab, four groundwater and four soil samples were submitted to the fixed laboratory for analysis. During our review of the Phase II ESA report, it was noted that Table 2 - Soil Analytical Results was missing from the report. Based on the investigation results in the narrative of the report, the landfilled waste is covered with approximately 1 to 10 feet of fill material. The landfilled waste ranges from 4 to 12 feet in thickness. Debris encountered includes newspaper, wire, plastic, bags, wood, foam rubber, brick, and metal pieces. Organic deposits and blue/gray native clays were encountered below the refuse material. Some of the refuse material was located below the groundwater surface. Field readings using an FID showed high levels of organic vapors likely caused by both contaminate vapors and decaying organic matter. Organic soils were found within the area of refuse and may have been used as daily cover during landfill operations. Concentrations of lead, cadmium, tetrachloroethane (PCE), benzoanthracene, b-benzoflouroanthene, 1,2- dichloroethene, 1,4-dichlorobenzene, and total PCBs were above Tier I SLVs. Lead and PCBs were above Residential SRVs. The groundwater analyses indicated detections of petroleum constituents at relatively low concentrations. Tetrachloroethylene, PCBs, and some benzene related parameters were detected at concentrations above HRLs. Elevated RCRA metal concentrations were also found in the collected groundwater samples. A map showing the soil boring locations from this investigation are included on Figure 5. The analytical reports and analytical summary table were omitted from the Phase II ESA Report. ' WENCK March 2019 3-4 Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. \\woodbury-dc1\Woodbury\Technical\5503 Lake West\02-Work Plan\Eisinger Meadows Investigation Report MAR 2019\Eisinger Investigation Report 2019.docx 4. 0 Investigation Methods and Procedures 4.1 FIELD INVESTIGATION RATIONALE The objective of this investigation was to identify if soil, groundwater and/or soil vapor impacts are present at the Site at concentrations of concern and to assess RECs identified in the Wenck Phase I ESA. The focus of the investigation was to assess the documented landfill at the Site. Procedures for soil, groundwater and soil vapor sampling activities followed Wenck's standard operating procedures. Standard operating procedures were adhered to with no deviations during the implementation of the work. Methods and procedures are described below. 4.2 SOIL INVESTIGATION The soil investigation activities were conducted on February 21 and March 1, 2019. Investigation activities included the advancement of 10 push-probe borings by Range Environmental Drilling (Range). Borings B-1 through B-10 were advanced to between 25 and 30 feet below grade (bg) to determine the depth of the engineered landfill cap, the thickness of encountered waste and the depth of native soils below the waste. The boring locations were selected to evaluate subsurface conditions in specific locations to provide good spatial coverage of the site, and to evaluate environmental conditions of the Site. Proposed boring locations were adjusted based on the presence of underground or overhead utilities. The locations of underground utilities were verified prior to drilling to ensure the safe advancement of each boring. The locations of the borings and soil vapor probes are shown on Figures 6 and 7. Figure 6 depicts the original site plan provided by Lakewest during the development of the Work Plan and used throughout site investigation activities. Figure 7 shows the current site plan as of March 20, 2019. Soil was collected continuously in five-foot drives by Range using a GeoprobeTM with a Macro-Core sampler. Upon reaching each interval, the nature of the recovered soil was assessed to conduct soil classification and observe for evidence of potential contamination (i.e., odors, staining, fill material, etc.). Soil samples were collected from the GeoprobeTM sampler by hand using clean dedicated nitrile gloves and placed into dedicated sealable polyethylene storage bags. Vapor headspace readings were collected using a photoionization detector (PID) equipped with a 10.6 eV source lamp calibrated to an isobutylene gas standard. Soil samples from each boring were collected in dedicated glassware, placed in a cooler with ice and submitted under chain-of-custody control to TestAmerica Laboratory, Inc. (TestAmerica) for laboratory analysis. The boring location rationale and analytical parameters sampled for soil are as follows: Boring ID Rationale Sample Laboratory De.th Anal sis B-1 Sample soil within the possible fill layer. No 5-10' DRO, GRO, VOCs, waste observed in this boring. PAHs, RCRA Metals, v^vWENCK March 2019 4-1 Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. \\woodbury-dcl\Woodbury\Technical\5503 Lake West\02-Work Plan\Eisinger Meadows Investigation Report MAR 2019\Eisinger Investigation Report 2019.docx Boring ID Rationale Sample Laboratory Death Anal sis PCBs B-2 . Sample soil within the waste layer. 15-20' DRO, GRO,VOCs, PAHs, PCBs, RCRA Metals B-3 Sample;,soil within the waste layer. 12.5-15' DRO, GRO, VOCs, PAHs, ,PCBs,-RCRA Metals B-4 Sample,soil within the waste layer. 12.5-15' DRO, GRO, VOCs, PAHs, PCBs, RCRA Metals B-5 Sample soil within the waste layer. 20-22.5' DRO, GRO, VOCs, PAHs, PCBs, RCRA Metals B-6 Sample soilwithin the waste layer. 22..5-25' DRO, GRO, VOCs, PAHs,rPCBs, RCRA Metals B-7 Sample soil within the waste layer. 5-10' DRO, GRO, VOCs, and PAHs, PCBs, RCRA 15-20' Metals B-8 Sample soil within the waste layer. 15-17.5' DRO, GRO, VOCs, PAHs, PCBs, RCRA Metals B-9 Sample soil within the waste layer. 9-10' DRO, GRO, VOCs, PAHs, PCBs, RCRA Metals B-10 Sample soil within the possible fill layer. No 0-5' DRO, GRO, VOCs, waste observed in this boring. PAHs, PCBs, RCRA Metals 4.3 GROUNDWATER INVESTIGATION Groundwater sampling was completed on February 21, and March 1, 2019. Temporary wells were installed by Range at boring locations B-2, B-3, B-4, B-5 and B-10. The temporary wells were constructed using one-inch PVC riser with a 10-foot slotted PVC screen. Groundwater was collected using a peristaltic pump connected to dedicated polyethylene tubing. Groundwater was purged to the degree possible, allowing the temporary well to recharge. The samples were collected in dedicated glassware, placed in a cooler with ice, and submitted under chain-of-custody control to TestAmerica for laboratory analysis. Temporary well locations are shown on Figures 6 and 7. The boring location rationale and analytical parameters sampled for groundwater are as follows: ^VWENCK March 2019 4-2 Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. \\woodbury-dc1\Woodbury\Technical\5503 Lake West\02-Work Plan\Eisinger Meadows Investigation Report MAR 2019\Eisinger Investigation Report 2019.docx Boring ID Rationale Screen Laboratory De•th Anal sis B-2 Sample fo ®oteo impacts related 15-2 thewaste tenethearea DRCO,s GRO ;d` issolved of.the RCRA metals PAHs proposedrsxornmwa er pond: -and;VOCs ., B-3 „ Sarn�le for®otential,impacts related to 14 24' DRO GRO dissolved the wasise aterlal RCRA metals PAHs "","0:4";", and VOCs • B-4 t [,Sample;forpotentiajimpacts related to, 10 20' eDRO GRO dissolved the rife m genal RCRA retalsPAHs • Band VOCs mwaste at ernaial ,�npacts related to 13 23' O, GRO,tdissolved, the , •, DCand•VOCs B-10 Sample` or p0 alacts along the X18 5 28 5' DRO, GRO, dissolved ' ' orthea i edge f the aan`dfill RCRA metals, PAHs end VOCs 4.4 SOIL VAPOR INVESTIGATION Soil vapor sampling was completed on February 27 and March 1, 2019. Range installed soil vapor sample probes at locations SV-1 through SV-15. Soil vapor sample tooling was advanced into the waste layer and the rod was then pulled back two to seven-feet to create a void space for sampling. Soil vapor locations outside of the waste area were drilled to 6 and 10 feet bg and then pulled back 2 to 5-feet to create a void space for sampling. The sampling void started at two feet and was increased due to tight soils at the boring location. The top of the hole around the rod was then grouted to seal the sample space from the above ground atmosphere. Dedicated polyethylene tubing was then placed down the rod and connected to a fitting at the rod tip. Three volumes of air were purged out of the sample line with a syringe prior to collecting the samples. The vapor samples were collected in one-L Summa canisters equipped with 200 mL per minute fill regulators and dedicated in- line moisture filters and one-L Tedlar bags. The soil vapor samples were submitted under chain-of-custody control to TestAmerica for analysis by TO-15 VOCs, methane by EPA Method 3C and hydrogen sulfide by EPA method 1516. A PID equipped with a 10.6 eV source lamp and four-gas meter were connected to the tubing for field screening purposes upon the completion of the Summa can sample collection. The locations of the soil vapor probes are shown on Figures 6 and 7. Originally, soil vapor boring locations were selected within the proposed building footprint of the multi-family building. However, preliminary plans changed after the investigation was completed, as shown on Figure 7. In our opinion, the collected data is still beneficial for determining proposed response actions at the Site. v^vWENCK March 2019 4-3 Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. \\woodbury-dcl\Woodbury\Technical\5503 Lake West\02-Work Plan\Eisinger Meadows Investigation Report MAR 2019\Eisinger Investigation Report 2019.docx The soil vapor probe location rationale and analytical parameters sampled for soil vapor are as follows: Vapor Rationale Sample Laboratory Analysis PID Probe Depth Reading ID . .m SV 1 "Assess potential soil vapor m 8 10` VOCs methane hydrogen 0.0 impacts at-the NE edge of sulfide, �. 'the landfill. ' SV 2 „Assess potential soil vapor : 4 :6.`. VOCs, methane,-hydrogen E Not rNE of the landfill. Sulfide . : „ measured fi. due to .= tight soil SV 3 „Assess potential soil vapor 5-10' VOCs, methane Not impacts at=the NE'-edge of measured the landfill. - due.,to :;. ; ._. tight soil SVS 4 Assess •potential soil vapor ;8-10' VOCs, methane, hydrogen" t0.1 impacts at the NE edge:of sulfide the landfill. SV-45 Assess potential soil vapor. 5 10' VOCs, methane, hydrogen X0.0 impacts at the NE edge sulfide =the landfill. -r. SV-6 Assess potential soil vapor 5-10' VOCs, methane, hydrogen ; 0.1' .£' rimpacts at the NE edge of sulfide the landfill. SV 7 Assess potential soil vapor. 5-10', VOCs, methane, hydrogen 0.2 `'NE of the landfill. sulfide SV-8 ;: Assess potential soil vapor.; 10;12' VOCs, methane, hydrogen 0.1;:. r,. impacts within the landfill.' sulfide SV-9',, Assess potential soil vapor. 5-12' VOCs, methane,hydrogen 00 impacts within the landfill. sulfide SV-10 Assess potential soil vapor 10-12' VOCs, methane, hydrogen 0.0 impacts within the landfill. sulfide SV-11 Assess potential soil vapor 8-10' VOCs, methane, hydrogen 0.1 impacts within the landfill. sulfide SV-12 Assess potential soil vapor 8-10' VOCs, methane, hydrogen 0.1 impacts within the landfill. sulfide SV-13 Assess potential soil vapor 5-12' VOCs, methane, hydrogen.. 0.1 impacts within the landfill. sulfide SV 14 Assess potential'soil vapor 5-10',: : VOCs, methane, hydrogen 0.0 impacts within the landfill. sulfide SV-15 Assess potential soil vapor 5-10' VOCs, methane„; 0.1:= impacts within the landfill. v^YWENCK March 2019 4-4 Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. \\woodbury-dc1\Woodbury\Technical\5503 Lake West\02-Work Plan\Eisinger Meadows Investigation Report MAR 2019\Eisinger Investigation Report 2019.docx 5. 0 Investigation Results 5.1 SOIL 5.1.1 Geology Wenck encountered a sandy clay soil cap above the waste ranging from 5 to 13 feet thick. The average thickness of the soil cap is approximately 10 feet. The waste layer was noted to extend 18 to 28 feet bg. The waste layer contained sandy clay, organic clay and peat containing pieces of wood, brick, concrete, metal, plastic, fabric and glass. There was also a strong organic odor noted within the waste layer. Below the waste layer Wenck encountered peat underlain in some borings by a stiff sandy clay. The sandy clay was noted in borings B- 2, B-4, B-6, B-8, and B-9. Borings B-1 and B-10 drilled outside of the waste layer, showed a layer of topsoil underlain by sandy clay to 29.5 and 30 feet bg, respectively. In boring B-10, a sand layer was encountered from 29.5 to 30 feet bg. Soil boring logs are included in Appendix A. Bedrock in the vicinity of the Site consists of the Jordan Sandstone Formation which is comprised of quartzose sandstone. The depth to bedrock is approximately 250 to 300 feet below the ground surface (Haugo, 2014). 5.1.2 Soil Analytical Results Soil investigation data compared detected concentrations of RCRA metals, VOCs, PAHs and PCBs to the MPCA's Residential SRVs. Additionally, MPCA Tier 1 SLVs were referenced to evaluate the potential risk to groundwater at the Site from the soil-to-groundwater leaching pathway. There are no established MPCA SRVs or SLVs for DRO or GRO. However, the MPCA has established a soil reuse guidance value of 100 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) for DRO and GRO in a document entitled Best Management Practices for the Off-Site Reuse of Unregulated Fill, dated February 2012. This document was developed to assist private parties in answering the question of whether exported fill was regulated versus unregulated with respect to identified chemical constituents. While DRO and GRO have no specific "cleanup goals" resulting from human toxicological studies, the 100 mg/kg benchmark has been routinely applied as a conservative value to ensure the site receiving fill does not become impacted as a result of the import of media. The analytical results for soil samples analyzed by TCLP were compared to the EPA Hazardous Characteristic for each metal to determine if the material meets "hazardous waste" criteria for management and disposal purposes. Field Screening Vapor headspace readings for VOCs were not detected above background concentrations (10 parts per million [ppm]) via field screening by PID in the soil borings, except in boring B-7. In boring B-7, elevated PID readings were noted at 5-10 feet at 15.8 ppm and 15-20 feet at 22.7 ppm. Vapor headspace readings and field observations are included on the soil boring logs in Appendix A. T9 WENCK March 2019 5-5 Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. \\woodbury-dcl\Woodbury\Technical\5503 Lake West\02-Work Plan\Eisinger Meadows Investigation Report MAR 2019\Eisinger Investigation Report 2019.docx DRO DRO was detected in soil samples collected from borings B-1 (5-10'), B-9 (9-10') and B-10 (0-5') near the northeast edge of the landfill ranging from below laboratory detection limits to 19.6 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg). Boring B-2 (15-20') within the footprint of the proposed stormwater pond had a DRO concentration of 185 mg/kg. DRO concentrations were reported at 20.4 mg/kg, 577 mg/kg and 1,790 mg/kg within the waste layer inside of the proposed building footprint. Within proposed greenspace areas, soil sample B-7 (5-10') and B-7 (15-20') had DRO concentrations of 9,960 and 196 mg/kg, respectively. Sample B- 8 (15-17.5') had a DRO concentration of 164 mg/kg. GRO GRO was detected in 2 of 11 collected soil samples. GRO was detected in boring B-5 (20- 22.5') at 42.2 mg/kg and in boring B-7 (5-10') at 14.1 mg/kg. RCRA Metals Various RCRA metals were detected in all of the samples collected and analyzed for RCRA metals. Lead was detected above the Residential SRV of 300 mg/kg in samples B-7 (5-10'), B-8 (15-17.5') and B-9 (9-10'). Mercury was detected above the Residential SRV of 0.5 mg/kg in samples B-5 (20-22.5') and B-7 (15-20'). Detected concentrations of metals did not exceed the MPCA SLVs. TCLP lead was analyzed from soil samples collected from borings B-3, B-6, B-7 (both sample depths), B-8 and B-9. The results showed TCLP lead concentrations below the hazardous waste limit of 5 milligrams per liter (mg/L). TCLP chromium was analyzed in soil sample B-7 (5-10') and was below the hazardous waste limit of 5 mg/L. VOCs A total of 11 soil samples collected from borings B-1 through B-10 were analyzed for VOCs. Compound 1,4-Dichlorobenzene was identified in three soil samples above the MPCA SLV of 0.2 mg/kg. SLV exceedance for 1,4-Dichlorobenzene were observed in the samples collected from B-3 (12.5-15' at 5.94 mg/kg), B-5 (20-22.5' at 0.886 mg/kg) and B-7 (15-20' at 0.318 mg/kg). In boring B-5 (20-22.5') 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene was detected at 5.29 mg/kg, above the established MPCA SLV of 2.7 mg/kg. Other detected VOCs were below their respective MPCA SLVs and Residential SRVs. PCBs PCBs were sampled in all 11 soil samples collected from borings B-1 through B-10. Total PCBs were detected in samples collected from B-3 (12.5'-15'), B-4 12.5'-15'), B-5 (20- 22.5') and B-7 (5-10') in excess of the MPCA SLV of 0.1 mg/kg. PAHs Various PAHs were detected above the laboratory reporting limit in 9 of 11 soil samples collected and analyzed for PAHs. No PAHs were detected in borings B-1 and B-10. These borings are located outside of the landfill area. Benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) equivalent concentrations were calculated to estimate the aggregated carcinogenic potential of PAHs relative to benzo(a)pyrene. The benzo(a)pyrene equivalent is calculated using the sum of the products of the respective relative potency slope factors multiplied by the compound's soil concentration. In boring B-7 (5-10') benzo(a)anthracene, naphthalene and the calculated BaP equivalent exceeded Residential SRVs. Boring B-7 is located within a proposed greenspace area. �^�WENCK March 2019 5-6 Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. \\woodbury-dcl\Woodbury\Technical\5503 Lake West\02-Work Plan\Eisinger Meadows Investigation Report MAR 2019\Eisinger Investigation Report 2019.docx Soil sample results are summarized in Table 1. Laboratory reports and supporting chain-of- custody documentation are included in Appendix B. 5.2 GROUNDWATER 5.2.1 Hydrogeology Groundwater was encountered in each boring drilled on the Site, except in borings B-1 and B-9. Groundwater was encountered at approximately 13-15 feet bg within the limits of the landfill and 18 to 21 feet bg along the northeast edge of the landfill. The general direction of regional groundwater flow in the area of the Site is noted to the south-southeast toward the Minnesota and Mississippi River systems (Haugo, 2014). Local conditions may vary due to surface water features, perched groundwater conditions or artificially created drainage systems. 5.2.2 Groundwater Analytical Results A groundwater sample was collected from temporary wells set in borings B-2, B-3, B-4, B-5 and B-10. The groundwater samples were analyzed for DRO (with silica gel cleanup), GRO, VOCs, dissolved RCRA metals and PAHs. Groundwater investigation data analysis compared detected concentrations of VOCs to the MDH HRLs, EPA MCLS and MDH HBVs to assess potential human health risks from exposures to chemicals in groundwater. There are no established risk-screening values for DRO and GRO. DRO was detected in temporary wells B-3, B-4 and B-5 ranging from 175 to 581 micrograms per liter (ug/L). GRO was not detected above laboratory reporting limits in any of the five temporary wells. VOCs were detected in temporary wells B-2 and B-3 above laboratory detection limits. In temporary well B-3, benzene was detected at a concentration of 3.24, slightly above the MDH HRL of 2.0 ug/L. Other detections of VOCs were below their established drinking water standards. PAHs were detected in temporary well B-3. Benzo(a)pyrene was detected at a concentration of 2.08 ug/L, which is above the MDH HRL of 0.06 ug/L. The remaining groundwater samples did not have detections of PAHs. Dissolved concentrations of arsenic, barium and lead were detected at naturally-occurring concentrations. None of the revealed metals were identified above established drinking water standards. Groundwater sample results are summarized in Table 2. Laboratory reports and supporting chain-of-custody documentation are included in Appendix B. 5.3 SOIL VAPOR The soil vapor data was compared to the MPCA's Intrusion Screening Values (ISVs) for Vapor Intrusion Risk. These guidelines were developed by the MPCA and serve as the state regulatory screening values for vapor intrusion risk in residential and commercial/industrial settings. The MPCA's "Best Management Practices for Vapor Investigation and Building WWENCK March 2019 5-7 Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. \\woodbury-dc1\Woodbury\Technical\5503 Lake West\02-Work Plan\Eisinger Meadows Investigation Report MAR 2019\Eisinger Investigation Report 2019.docx Mitigation Decisions," published in October 2016, states that if soil gas concentrations collected near a receptor are less than 33 times (33x) the applicable ISVs (Residential or Industrial), then the risk is considered low and no further vapor intrusion investigation is needed at those receptor locations. If soil gas concentrations are equal to or greater than 33x the applicable ISVs (Residential or Industrial), more thorough soil gas investigation and/or considerations for vapor mitigation may be required. The compound 1,3-Butadiene was detected above the Residential ISV of 0.3 ug/m3 in 13 of 15 soil vapor samples. 1,3-Butadiene exceeded 33x the Residential ISV of 10 ug/m3 in 8 of 15 soil vapor samples. 1,3-Butadiene is primarily used in the manufacture of synthetic rubber, it forms during combustion and may be a product of microbial degradation occurring in soil. It is found in wood and cigarette smoke, oil burner emissions, rubber tires and exhaust from internal combustion engines. Benzene concentrations were detected above the Residential ISV of 4.5 ug/m3 in 9 of the 15 soil vapor samples ranging from 4.7 to 15 ug/m3. One benzene concentration of 610 ug/m3 exceeded 33x the Residential ISV in sample SV-15. Various other VOCs were detected above laboratory reporting limits in the soil vapor samples collected at the Site; however, none of the detected concentrations of VOCs exceeded 33x their respective Residential ISVs. Methane was detected above laboratory detection limits in 8 of 15 soil vapor samples. The concentrations ranged from 0.47% to 30%. Two results were above 5% for methane in soil vapor samples SV-9 and SV-12. The field measured Lower Explosive Limit (LEL) at SV-9 and SV-12 were 100% and 66%, respectively. The LEL for methane is 5% and the Upper Explosive Limit (UEL) for methane is 15%. Hydrogen sulfide was detected above laboratory detection limits in 2 of 13 collected soil vapor samples. In SV-2, hydrogen sulfide was detected at 0.53 ppm and in SV-12 at 9.8 ppm. The established regulatory limit for hydrogen sulfide is 20 ppm. There were no detections of hydrogen sulfide on the four-gas meter. Cumulative soil vapor sample results are summarized in Table 3. Laboratory reports and supporting chain-of-custody documentation are included in Appendix B. T^V WENCK March 2019 5-8 Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. \\woodbury-dcl\Woodbury\Technical\5503 Lake West\02-Work Plan\Eisinger Meadows Investigation Report MAR 2019\Eisinger Investigation Report 2019.docx 6. 0 Discussion 6.1 SOIL DISCUSSION A sandy clay cap is located over the landfill area of the Site. The cap varies from approximately 5 to 13 feet in thickness. The average thickness of the landfill cap is approximately 10 feet. The bottom of the waste layer was noted to extend to depths of between 18 to 28 feet bg. The nature of the waste includes sandy clay, organic clay, peat and pieces of wood, brick, concrete, metal, plastic, fabric and glass. Underlying the waste layer is native peat and sandy clay. Field screening did not reveal elevated headspace readings above 10 ppm, except in boring B-7 at 5-10 feet (15.8 ppm) and 15-20 feet (22.7 ppm). Boring B-7 is located within a proposed greenspace area in the southeast quadrant of the landfill. Various petroleum-related VOCs were detected within the waste layer in borings B-2, B-3, B-5 and B-7. The compound 1,4-Dichlorobenzene was detected over the MPCA SLV in borings B-3, B-5 and B-7 and 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene was detected over the MPCA SLV in boring B-5. DRO was detected over 100 mg/kg in seven soil samples collected within the waste layer. GRO was detected below 100 mg/kg in all of the collected soil samples. Total PCBs were detected above the MPCA SLV in borings B-3, B-4, B-5 and B-7 within the waste layer. PAHs were detected above Residential SRVs in boring B-7, located within the proposed greenspace area. Various RCRA metals were detected in the collected soil samples. Lead was detected above the Residential SRV in borings B-7, B-8 and B-9 within the waste layer and mercury was detected above the Residential SRV in borings B-5 and B- 7 within the waste layer. TCLP lead and chromium were analyzed based on the total results and were detected below their respective hazardous waste limits. With the soil detections of petroleum-related VOCs and PCBs above the MPCA SLV; PAHs, lead and mercury above the Residential SRVs; and the detection of DRO in the waste material over 100 mg/kg, the future redevelopment of the Site and soil management should be conducted under an approved MPCA RAP. The MPCA document "Best Management Practices for the Off-Site Reuse of Unregulated Fill," dated February 2012, defines unregulated fill as excess soil in which a release of contaminants has been identified at concentrations less than the MPCA's most conservative risk-based values. The criteria for unregulated fill are described as the following: A Soil free from solid waste, debris, asbestos containing material, visual staining, and chemical odor; A Organic vapors less than 10 ppm as measured by a PID; A For petroleum impacted soil, less than 100 mg/kg DRO/GRO; A For contaminants detected in soil, less than the MPCA's Residential SRVs and MPCA Tier 1 SLVs. C W 6WENCK March 2019 6-1 Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. \\woodbury-dcl\Woodbury\Technical\5503 Lake West\02-Work Plan\Eisinger Meadows Investigation Report MAR 2019\Eisinger Investigation Report 2019.docx 6.2 GROUNDWATER DISCUSSION Groundwater analytical results from temporary wells indicate the presence low level VOCs in borings B-2 and B-3. Benzene was slightly above the HRL in boring B-3. DRO ranged from 175 to 581 ug/L in borings B-3, B-4 and B-5. PAH constituents were detected in boring B-3 with benzo(a)pyrene above the established drinking water standards. GRO concentrations were not detected in the collected groundwater samples and dissolved metal concentrations were low. There were no detections of the analyzed parameters, except barium, in B-10 at the northeast edge of the landfill. Groundwater was encountered at approximately 13-15 feet bg within the limits of the landfill and 18 to 21 feet bg along the northeast edge of the landfill. 6.3 SOIL VAPOR 1,3-Butadine was detected above 33x the Residential ISV in 8 of 15 soil vapor samples collected within the waste layer at the Site. Benzene was detected at 33x the Residential ISV in sample SV-15. Methane levels were above LEL of 5% in soil vapor samples SV-9 and SV-12 and hydrogen sulfide was below 20 ppm in all of the collected samples. Based on the historical use of the Site as a landfill, it is plausible that 1,3-butadine is present based on the decomposition of waste material, however, sample SV-2 had the highest concentration of 1,3-butadiene and is located approximately 100 feet northeast of the landfill. Based on widespread sources some of which are anthropogenic and other possibly naturally occurring there appears to be naturally occurring 1,3-butadiene at the Site. Soil vapor should be addressed under an approved MPCA RAP for the proposed redevelopment activities at the Site. T^TWENCK March 2019 6-2 Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. \\woodbury-dcl\Woodbury\Technical\5503 Lake West\02-Work Plan\Eisinger Meadows Investigation Report MAR 2019\Eisinger Investigation Report 2019.docx 7. 0 Conclusions and Recommendation 7.1 CONCLUSIONS Based on the field observations and laboratory of soil, groundwater and soil vapor samples collected and analyzed from the Site, Wenck submits the following conclusions: 1. The landfill cap at the Site ranges from 5 to 13 feet thick. The average thickness of the cap is 10 feet. Analytical sampling of the cap in borings B-1 and B-10 do not show exceedances above Residential SRVs or MPCA SLVs. 2. Soils within the documented landfill extend 18 to 28 feet bg and are underlain by peat and sandy clay. The landfill soils contain sandy clay with pieces of wood, glass, brick, concrete, metal, plastic and fabric. Soils within the waste layer would not be considered for off-site reuse as unregulated fill. This decision is based on the MPCA document "Best Management Practices for the Off-Site Reuse of Unregulated Fill," dated February 2012. 3. Soils near boring B-7 appear to have elevated concentrations of PAHs and lead above Residential SRVs at 5 to 10 feet below grade. A soil sample collected from 15 to 20 feet bg show concentrations below the Residential SRVs. 4. Lead and mercury concentrations were detected above Residential SRVs within the waste layer. However, the detections were below the hazardous waste limits for lead and mercury. 5. Total PCBs, 1,2,4-trimethylbenzne and 1,4-dichlorobenzene were detected above MPCA SLVs within the waste layer. 6. Groundwater analytical results from the temporary wells show benzene and benzo(a)pyrene above the established MDH HRLs in boring B-3. 7. Soil vapor testing identified the presence of 1,3-butadine and benzene above 33x the Residential ISVs. Methane was elevated above the LEL of 5% in two samples collected within the landfill area. 7.2 RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the conclusions of this Remedial Investigation Report, Wenck offers the following recommendations: 1. For future redevelopment on the Site, a RAP should be prepared and submitted to the MPCA Voluntary Brownfield Program for review and approval. The RAP establishes the rationales, goals and methods for a proposed site cleanup customized to the planned redevelopment. The RAP should include a Construction Contingency Plan (CCP) to address unanticipated environmental conditions that may be encountered during the planned redevelopment. 2. Regulated fill will require proper management whether re-used on-site or exported off-site to an MPCA-approved disposal facility. Additional characterization of fill soil and native soil that will be interacted with during redevelopment may be necessary and will be addressed in the RAP. 3. Groundwater is impacted at the Site and may or may not require dewatering activities during redevelopment. Site plans and finished floor elevations will be reviewed during the development of the RAP to determine if permitting will be needed for dewatering activities. '^YWENCK March 2019 7-1 Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. \\woodbury-dcl\Woodbury\Technical\5503 Lake West\02-Work Plan\Eisinger Meadows Investigation Report MAR 2019\Eisinger Investigation Report 2019.docx 4. Soil vapor mitigation will be required to protect the proposed buildings at the Site, especially if waste is anticipated to be re-used or left in-place at the Site. Details of the mitigation plans will be included in the RAP. Michelle L. Hosfield Shane A. Waterman, PG (MN) Environmental Scientist/Associate Principal T^VWENCK March 2019 7-2 Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. \\woodbury-dcl\Woodbury\Technical\5503 Lake West\02-Work Plan\Eisinger Meadows Investigation Report MAR 2019\Eisinger Investigation Report 2019.docx Figures Figure 1 : Site Location Map Figure 2: Site Detail Map Figure 3: Preliminary Plat Figure 4: Site and Landscaping Plan Figure 5: Historical Boring Locations Map Figure 6: Boring Locations and Extent of Landfill and Fill Soils Map (Old Site Plan) Figure 7: Boring Locations and Extent of Landfill and Fill Soils Map (Current Site Plan) ... - ---vlt---_,:,,a,,i.,.. ,A.,....- -.,, 3i,..... ,.,..--:.-;.. _ ...,....„ .....,..„ ,,,,,r 0 ,,, ' Ir .7 fir. .�. { .. , t, ''• '' m- < L ^a _..fy ,r � ..;tip ," ' • .,. it rL •hOR_fl ,r: ' j55. _ • . I., '. ► . �t d" =/ as # r - 4. ,t iso ° j f 13 , . .Mit— ,,_,y m ' ..2;.`,,,,_444.14--,'...Y/,' " �� � ', "s '-- ---,4;:-.. -4/ ...,--....)-11-,-..-„,,:i, t -` .,?:, • •.-4 . ,„ .. ..:„.,..,,,_:„...;,,,,:. 1 ,,_4.'iiiiis Is r�u� .., ` _ - Fins"�"""� _J Net . ' — ---- `-' .� ; ; ,.0 �...:...-..mil.,?).,.... �.. .k,,:_„...... .� •____,,,,_ X3999 s t'M�F R - ,� x' #.tit.: - e. i I. r .1 p _ • t // .,, y^ . 1, �! z :-— ,.--- y . ' Subject Property f - C i\i, `'',%, � i4ett /� K\ o . '''-''''`k., fah �.9', _ ' ,I "`,'� �lo�s - C. • • il • .'`-. _ i 2 -►• per i ttii ow. I ' 2 ! Z?'/ \. J/ -- ‘ ' Iff• .' < •., If,. �� _ '-4;> �� ); . •.%*-4t- w".-'-'44------4/4i • o f •,. ` \•'y\ tom\ �` i F'/ 1r�1 J f, '� ,R u _ ` { � 44,,,„„1(('. , 4 t ri :-:'" 9-, �/ ;.. ,.. 1 `" ,I/t;t i t�� -_ +tet r ..� ' x ;�t! � ' ' � .�t t - a �+- � � Anoka _ ^� ,� ...5 ,� '`i+^ ,,...:,.''••••"*)* fir" + y_ /„ County v f �, I I ' ,*,� 4c -.�„ : ' wri ht Area of Detail � • r‘,.:';„,;;',60,4,,.-*.-., '' County f rg '+� -. Hennepin Excelsior 7.5 Minute Quadrangle (USGS: 1997) tSr 3 County Rockford 7.5 Minute Quadrangle (USGS: 1993) j a / �i�y=: . Hamel 7.5 Minute Quadrangle(USGS: 1993) ...- �' t, jti Mound 7.5 Minute Quadrangle (USGS: 1993) N # fq �C , ' ., 2,000 1,000 0 2,000 d sf Carver ) * County � � Feet ; t Scott Path:L:\650310002\MXD\Site Location Map mxd +tom �,Copyrig t:©2O1=3 _... County Date:1/25/2017 Time:3:1303 PM User KacHD060fi ---- . ��` Ya /1 ,. ai LAKEWEST, LLC ^�WENCK JAN 2017 ASSOCIATES Site Location Map Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. Figure 1 r #?' '' 5# n S $ f • s} • w sf ` r ' 4 1,s • � Subject Property r Wa zata vd ,_' x, t. ;„';';.**',:•,-', M7 ' :' .,\;t,t,-"."',.-..,-, '''''', -'-'' ''...:',""t:- a Rr 7 'L.j, y,k.[. Jr • y�ani Y.;•-. -'#. h f`. py la 'i'' w!` '' 'x.,.,wa------.. y ti y lifkikr- + 5 3 1 x x • fr `` L sloe; ., .. ...,.. • 2015 Aerial Photograph (Source: Hennepin County) N 74;„;:-'',,, `' f 1` .x 300 150 0 300 �� Feet , .+� A a� fkk. Path:L:\5503\0002/MXD/Site Detail Map.mxd ,, .ky &A'-t u *. Date:1/25rz017 Time:3:1525 PM User:KacHD0606 ,,.y , LAKEWEST, LLC ^�WENCK JAN 2017 - ASSOCIATES Site Detail Map Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. Figure 2 O WO iron EN.EIERNa k DEVELOP3AENT DATA -- 1 I ZONING Ryari7 \ 1 OUSTING ZONING Ant,(P.A....ma) PROPOSED ZONING ',DO Engneering \ i LAND DEVELOPMENT SEPVCE5 \ i MINIMUM LOT REQUIREMENTS(VILLAS) FRONT SETEIACK 25 FEET FROM LON.. REAR/SIDE SEM., 5 FEET WAYZATA BLVD WETIAND BUFFER 10 FEET FROM WEILANO El,FER 10855 Waterford Fl :Mr=aro, lOsr:17=1=Tar' Escalator,AIN 55331 (952)221-3700 3=11.111iiiillilfillalliMMIns.We 1 SINGLE FAMILY VILLAS(Elslocier Meadows Previous Approval) la Z:141------4 -1-141 A e ,if, i /7, GROSS SrrE AREA EXISTING ROW Me,.E. 18 act 4 (A.A.) ) liFIAAAAAA A ,,/' al OCK 1 ,....r.......km 06 I / -In Pri zar A'f '-, / OUTLOT A OUTLOT 0 1 '' t //,/ ..4 -01-.-...10--4,i-‘-f-tr--.......4,-,—/ MULTIPLE FAMILY FLATS DATA N ewe now a KOCK] EISINGER ovirwousyr APR.,. OUTLOT C(E.ws.AAA 2 S7. OUTLOT 0(AAA wm, 10'.. \ N FLATS II _ ,,, - J( MP..1.400. NET DEVELOPABLE 9 8 Fel t' _J I - • j, ;1 "`"-""° RECREATIONAL AREA 110,41 9 99 lac X PROPOSED LIF 24,.tla. Orono,MN illeh..0 for - (.4 ilats/9 a«, ".. ''•4,. '\ - HP,J1', ,1 T---, ':- ;\ WIWI 0 LAKEWEST,LLC N N 1s ''' r r... . a I N \ ees A PROPERTY ACOFESS \ \ p.,..,. NG 1 S' 1745 WAYZATA BLVD WEST ORONO LIN 3.56 Nad On*./hen. \ ',.6, N PROPERTY AREA r•Zrr''''''' N s , , --:, ,\ ' ,•,•••••0 N\ NZ A \ '<lb N „\ i \ 4'.:f;T. ' / , --, ----__ LEGAL DESCRIPTION SEE SURVEY a...a ay .e. Remsb."" ....,......,....... !molar_Mll,r_ • Bch*Dintol see.,pewee.. SeAn Ina e.cr1—. Pram.,II* FM 1.1•0 151.{1 Preliminary I Plat —_;—+——— _ ,-... a PTO "AN BI.E13115. / 1 Preliminary Plant Schedule _ Ryan nix l u� f,,,,,,n... Engineering i WAYYAlk eLV0. - - ' *SL= .M'uw 4•• Y. vf• .4.. U.00[nt u1T[.. _ _ pass w.t.N.ra� 1 •••. — s... l..se•...�w..r• 11::. es: Excelebr,AN 55331 \ _, 'S I� �i�� ,� �I `R ` J Nam e1 r..i. erg/w'> �•,•� i u>uw .....2F3]Oa t XL IN As NOM V at.11. AS sal r er IP A3 ppm if at.NI As mils S'1 .� ��®IJ�,ai J 61.44100141116111 I m�yuml Wm espy Dm se./ro throe/.a...�. : �'..—a..'—" (90 Pas \ /. afaprl6` � . �I�I�®I �I ��.�I P�IP' ' Ayf ? mn..e.r 'n '/ ....:d,w"`. .p ,lf6t�. FYI 't1i�D� F. �.411441./ tPsi SAA.4%7. ......s 4...�w, A.. e. \ I %►? = _=%� — .a...r1A...e.a.UST61A .,A1UP I. samea CPlanting Notes � Pm \\I r l /'li Y;. r. on ..a.pr.era p.rN..�..b t..p�... Peps.,....b EISINGER N7N �111Wf� 1—. .a.�...�..�p.ro�. roes......p.n.�..w.Nee se b...... �" ��� Al t.ee me.A. p....=War WAS.er.e.pale......t..DP. FLATS \ _ IMillk1 r •....... ..".r...........y.:1.'x".4 \ c I� N v f 1 �, ......rrM.p�n'"...`p'p.....p.t........0 es�.es Orono,MN vvv vv ) LII � �rillill )� Iii ) 3. ..temat A,m. ,..,...M�Ya....,AA1...w.e...... for 9 1 m*i w�e..,..,..i tr le..pees.. ....w r...r(pees.. .e.) \ �� �� . ....-11,.�...m.ea.Ms..p..a„pa LAKEwesT.LLC \ N\ _ , A mr.) e....p mese.....0.-...and bat /Pm...a.w 1 :=1:4=0,5,55 °..:" P.'" ."'".spm = ...r \ \\ \ \ \• \ Calbse.MA........r vs° i.a,selmM.p...M..un...peat...Y este....A. ..e.. a N ��I�.1i;1 ( 1n.Mean.h....p.+sN........r...AN.Y.rAmr.i..n.....n Agrcrbe....5-.. N .1 1Dap-F'''' N �\ .NL NEA _ ` �.\ ..pi map...b se es..ssep es pee w.. T'�b \• pes. .la..a A . Dom.T )a.. *e. ei,..5.....e ees l ...n ase..A . ...tb v Meen see.—,.y... .*.ar-a.�Via...f.wq NY.Mia.....0....... is.. _ ___ a Pm Tee nn...rem PP Pr .W .p.....a...pe.b Me a.abameX.n. \\\ 1. .reps,s pMw ue/ra a MM�MesmY roadway Pules..a M}m1 b.a pp --- 17 p .mae.n M.a.m° �.�••s nq.s�.a s srnM+.N a.+.w Dew..w Evergreen Detail Tree Detail ———- pad w.... .rsp.a ten m c...r. g — 1.n ae"ssape mewl eter.p s..sees.M..SP*aall m i..r........t.t V14% =-c—— LEGEND _ Landscape Requirement Calculations �� ra'--T'•.^=;....— OVERALL PROJECT LANDSCAPE REOUIREYEN TS �E.,DerePurnenl �°"" CL�'� =, /'- Q• � r J.a ®tam _.. � WC 47i r E'_Jz.71ii�= 981— PROM.cColloURS ��i .mrom owt..tea is.:n®maitre nen :v....c MI..(.aa:,mam) -.,am `..."`�' isie �I! �:` ►. . c=''" = - -- .ate. . a tea-na:m,,E..a NF .m.�.�. Preliminary -e. =3 : = .m.e...pa.... .a .Y...� Landscape '-- i.min..mr Mn+) —'-"—'- Shrub Detail ..... ��- mn Plan db ".�"'.. I caav '. A.EE.w..(o A''NIA, F-1=4=----.4:: — — Q. a -1121.131 m,:ffi30P Cr-PYr.e.,° ITEM •COMMON ..•� ___ CP 00,.STATE ONE CAU. ®� :.1% --- 0112 IMP Mb LA ,a.aEE.C01.1.0.13 IMO E.N. L1 ' , Legend aB r il Test Pit Locations ,. _ ..„ 1.,. , :a B' eller �'�� �j�j !t.,, r� { ■ July,2015 B >, smm _ � w© �!1/E�11---11 M I I. i 4`\`�~i § ' • a�` Haugo Geotech Barings B €134'3 � +, �iln� � .` � ® October,2015 A ; s. E'II1D E� -111111111:' f®�- I li �I�� I ® September,Geot ' .. - sB zc . � aka, \ APProx+ Aug Haugo Geotech Borings P 4 11' - moi � • August,2014 IST L`• II A k�iD Approximate EnecoTech Borings 1 .f r ' ' .' • August,2000 t. 1 . ij]/ %{�� t7r w,.-ti O May,2001 } fr < * „ Approximate GME Push Probes i�� f .J + March,1998 t'a ] (Note Location of P-12 not known) �1 `7 y �,, O County Parcels )i Cyd" v h' t4 \ O "> ` Ira a , "( 0 4BA ' ';:l.':::*:;;)"*(,',,,, 1111k0‘,„'-,. -:,;, 0:1,0 Rte , 20 60 0 120 " r. Feet s. 4. ..".._... 1leibt ...ate. 1e.,.., ft a�.>a,rso,e r..e,owww �..sw<m.� LAKEWEST, LLC—EISINGER MEADOWS DEVELOPMENTilk �WENCK FEBFigure 2019 e Historical Boring Locations Map (Old Site Development) Qe Po��p,,,e,E„eP,o,,0-0,- 5 m� Legend Tri --" .--- �L131431 .. . . . 17111-1 n wengBo n9 Locatrons IP ,.� 7 � • So11 Feb March 2019 f11Y3 Q)•{}7 J D41'D f �'�" g. I���� r r �` ♦ Soil Vapor Feb-March 2019 c � E�fld•7777 ���Al 1 rr eTifi A ♦ So and Groundwater Feb-March 2019 ,,, z - Q-0 i '.4(�:iir �ilt.m . �m11 \• Test Pit Locations 'ears .£i ■ July,2015 IRE , , 4. .. -, : . 1... . }}}}} ass s�zlijollw Haugo Geotech Bonngs SB 19 Sl� ;-...) x "� ts.�_ ...fin ■ October 2015 / " .. £` ® September 2016 rs a-?s ;� ;ilr„, c_s ! � Approximate Haugo Geotech Borings ���` • August 2014 } Approximate EnecoTech Borings i 2 . ` 4 ,- _SS, ■ August,2000 v-s �� . ,.,, ,�,� = O May.2001 4 ®_ Approximate GME Push Probes tt of -a ..,*, x,.. ...-A,."' March 1998 } � �{: + (Note'.Loca9 1 P 12 not known) i ._. z , Approximatenortheast _ - -," " boundary of the landfill '" Appror mate eMent of fll ED �� i�' soils part of the landfill ca p. ;p ,.,� County Parcels toh.,.- —,,t,:,, ,,„„..„, --N.,_,...„,,,,,,,,.....77 „,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,. ,. ,....,.., 'i#?s 'O 4�0 120 60 0 120 " f Feet J � -_,''':','-..-'41- t € Iii", = �n. _... .t � � T ,w v,.Qa r..'.,.:ow a...s�„coa.o LAKEWEST,LLC EISINGER MEADOWS DEVELOPMENT v^vWENCK MAR 2019 Boring Locations Map and Extent of Landfill and Fill Soils (Old Site Plan) cO,0 z;eP,rr er E,e,€;o a,o r ome=. Figure 7 is "."......" ..".11 '�' � �,.--� Legend '1� m -- � 1 ' ^" Wenck Bor ng Locations EiTt#] b ,I s. . ! . . . . 1. t ,y._, • Sod Fed G' 2019 J e ' E33fl cEND • 'a - ....�,.�•..�• . „„_._____.•-.. ,; *'1 ® Soil Vapor FebMarch 2019 F33Ll s s ` _ * �� >A E •1■ ■+■+������'''''' # So and Groundwater Feb-March 2019 > , E,'1t7\ f 'S -;.©?9 • RAS., ,�� 87'- v ns \\\' °3 ■_ ! i�.� ■ Test Pit Lowtio e. p f30 f'B£D 0.P ;I July,2015 } �+s a) 7f-,:p1 i iv Haugo Geotech Borings �E ¢� i • October,2015 as dP ' ® sePtember,2015 4 ;`rse "'r,-1 Approximate Haugo Geotech Borings g ll£�:R4 i :- 1 p7. yn.§ #-'r! a . ...�. • H:12014 2t� f ' APProximate EnecoTech Borings ,, • .1, _ x : • August,2000 Ems.: t ' s' p May 2001 ' rc sS ` APProximate GME Push Probes III ' m s- 4 March 1998 u ; ,t 11 + (Note:Location of P 12 not known) , .0 '� Approx mate northeast boundary otthelendfll 4a a sApprte extent of � E1� < ''•`'� # sos,°partaof the landfill cap. 33 i °',sa vv �' r O County Parcels P(.- Ft :',::".1:''X. Bile ' ?. O P''- :.:-'u A * ciav P-s ' • 20 so 0 20 m Feet µµ# ffid*.i.4"...-.. ✓ . zarso,u rn^e,znu., wsiuiema LAKEWEST,LLC EISINGER MEADOWS DEVELOPMENT v^YWENCK MAR 2019 Boring Locations Map and Extent of Landfill and Fill Soils (Current Site Plan) csPon„;epareer.E„repco.,;outcomes. Figure 7 Tables Table 1 : Soil Analytical Results Table 2: Groundwater Analytical Results Table 3: Soil Vapor Analytical Results Table 1 IMICIMMICEMES3111111311MIEKBEIMIDEEMEIRINESEMESICZOREGINIME161111111211231CMGICKEIMMITIMINMOMMFL Compou.Parameter 310-149954-1 310-149954-2 310-1499543 310-149954-4 310.149954-5 310-150364-2 310.1.3.-4 310.1503643 310.150364.5 310-1503646 310.1503647 310.150364.1 31(3149954-6 13 - SR2013 II=MEEMMIKEIMMEECI=MIERMEM 03/010019 •03/01/2019 03/010019 03/010019 03/010019 03/010019 oart,rz2009ote MEM - Volatiles . 11.11111111.1 MEME=12: 11:110EENIZEIEMMIliliEMM2116M=Mall INIML.MEINCIESEM=OEM MUM <0 1. <0+00 -miumnet esimosmosainmsimm=11M3MMIIEMMIEEZM=IMMMEIMMEIMMME3EZMMESEMOMIXEM <0 1. .1. "111111111119==MI IMEEZI= NEEISIMIELIIIIIECE11111111=11111111MEEMMEIRIIIIIICCECCIIIIIIIIIEIMINI3IM MEIEMMEISEM=OEM <0.1. . li=1:102:113111•13101111•1311•1111EENIXEMNIEMEM1111M1111111112:EIMINIEEEMINEIBLEMMEEMMEEM=IMM <0.0 . 13.7-7S011°/.13f139/9111M/9, WICIIIIIMESE1111111161E1711111MESEMIIIMEZIIIIMIZEIMICCESE11111112311MMIXEMIZIMMINCCIEEIN <0 :MOWfl .&s.-..-. ..0 -fl!MaL: 1. <0.100 111C-111=1=1 1111=III::122!=WEOCIMEIEM=EIEEM=1:M=M:CIEMMEKEMMSMIMMIMEEMMEGIEMM:131EMIIIIIIMMINIIIIIIIIIM .1. <0+00 17-2-M1111111 1311=1E1EXIIIIIII3EIMIECIMINIMMINIIIIIEEEM WEE=MEEINIMIMMINIEEEMMEMMMIMEMNEMEM . <0 1. 1 • ELI:MIME 1 2 3-Tnchlorot(ensene KEEDLIBINESECIIIIIIIMMIIMIESEINIIIIMEIMIKINIMMIRMISIMMEMIIIEIXEMMEIZEMMEEMMIIEM <0,00 IRIEREINE:131XEMIZEIENIMECIEMIIIIIIEEMMICIIIIIIIERZIIIMLEIIIMMEEMINIIESEEMMMIEM=EOM MUM <0,00 . F::.:L.M1/11NIE IIIXEMMEMESIMMIMMIEEIM=IM3MMIEEMMEIDMMEECEM=133EM=IMM=OMMMEXEMMEILLIM 111=311:1E=IIINUE1111111111EMIIIIMIMINIIII133101111011MIEZNIIIMMIIIIIIIMIEMMOIEMMESIMMEIZEM <0 LL=11111IN liECI:=ILIMEMEMEIHIIIIIMEEN111111:01EIMMEKEMINIMMEIMMIIMEMMINZEIMMITIMMMICE=MIXIM • La.:77M1111111111 ElE=121=EllECIIECIM33101111111336511111•11131331MICIEMIIIIIMUCEIMIIMISE11111111112EMIMESEMMEISEMMIEM . niii3=111111 EIRC2212101MILEEMMESEEINIIINESEIM MIEN WINIIIIIIMEMMEESEIN111111033MECCIENIMCIECINIIIKIEENI EIEEKIIMEMEMEMMEIBEEMM:11M=MESEMM:IMEMMIECIMMEIEEMMEXEMMECIZEMIIINSIENSIIIIMEINI . <0 1 00 1 0. /111 1111=121MMEMM:36 :11ECIMINCIXEMIIIIIERZMIIIICCELINIMEREMMEEEC EMMEIEMICCIEEN1111112M111 <0 0. <0 .. 111111111113111110 MILEEMRE LIEME=IMIEIMEIMEEZIMMICEM111.3311•11111¢11EMIINEMINIIIICCE:111111EIMIIIIIIESEEMIIIMEIII=MEMCIEM _ :16111111M1=1 EllE1=52!MINEI1MIEMM2JBEEMIIIMIEE=MECIENIIIIIIEEIMMINECEEEININEIMEMIMIZEIIIIMENIMIMEIEMI <0.1. <0,00 : 3111111111:1111M EIECEMIZEIEIMMINEMMSMEINIMCIM=MESEMMEEIDNIIMEECINIINTEEEIMMEICEEIMMIC3E11111111.01EMIMIEMI <0 0. <0.,. 1■111WIEM 1[11=IME1=351=IXIEEMMSMEMOMM2111=CIEM10,1,,r31=2:MMESC4111151=311MM:13:1011111111133110111MME111 <0 100 <0 • EllESIMEEMIIIMEENNINIZEIMMIIIMIENIIIKEINIMMEMMMEMMICEINIIIIMEEIIIME3E1111 <0 1. <0.1. ' 3111111111112= 6:12011MIEIMEMEMMM:CHEMINICCIEEIMMICC1611111MEE11111=1:1ECIMIIIMMIIIIIECIIMIMEIEEMMEEMMUIIMMEHEMMEME . _ . 11111111111 .4 15511:1111MEMEHIMMEIEEM=1:11IIMMEMMEEEMMOIMIIIMENIIIIIIIMEIMINCLIZMIIII23101111MSECIE .1. <0..0 ... 111111111C12= :210111EXIEEM:123i1MMUIMM=1===3:11=MMIMEM=1:MIMMEIEEMMEEEMMEREINIMEIEM11111:011111111 '17 1. '03. CEEIMIPMEGEMILIINMEEEMMOEIM=CIIEMMIEEM=CIRMM:CIECMMEIMMMEMIMMICE1111111111:01ElliM13312:11M 1211:1ELECIIIMMEIMMME11111111111:672•1111111=2:11111111•231111=1=11111=110111111WIMMIIMEMM=IIEMMEIZEM <0 0. ' _ 1111111111M-117, El71=1NEZ:311MMIEMMEMESIII=EIEMINECIEINIIIIMMIII=CIENNIMIMEEMINEREMIMMEEMMIIIMMIIEM <0,00 <0,. . . .31111111111:E= 12=1111131b€1911MEXIEMECIEEMM:M=MINZMMIEDZINMEEC:11111INTEEEIMEIIIIMMIZEMMESEIIIIIIMEIM <0.100 <0.i. All11111113EM 0:=311nEINI1111336=====CIEMMMEMMEELMMIHMMIll5=MECEMIIKSOMIIIIIMUCIM <0 100 <0.1 00 _ ONIIIMIECM 1=2:111SZKEEMMESIEMMEENINIIIICCE311111M:CIEIMMEEMIIIIIEEEMMIEEEMMEGIMMEIZEMIMESEIIIMIESEM .103 .) • . 121==== MEIEEEMMEUEZIMM:13EIMINIC1331111E1112131Z1MIMICEEMIIIIIINCOREMIN:CHEIMMIEHMMEIEMMEEMINESEM <0 1. . ' 111111111113MiL, 1:=INEEIMMINIZIEMMEEE1711111=0311111111031:111111ECIEZIIIIIIIMEIMMDEINIIIIEBEEINIIMEIIIMMENIMMSEM • ' 211111111110EA 1:=IMMMEENIIIISMEMMESTEMIIINEXELMIIMIXEmsaimnimucimansarrimsimmsommmazEm <,500 • mmirm;:-.1-.N 121=2:1EZIMEMMENIEMM:231051111111MEICIIIMINEEIESIMIZIMINIIIIMINIIIECISEMINEE11111111111=MMIUMMICEM <0,. . MEMEMESEEMMIXESIMM311111111WIEMIIMEEZEINEXIM INEEEEMMEEIMMINCEM=OEM=OEM .1. <0,. .amerz;:a - g1-.'EIMMEIIMMME=MIXEMMM <0, ' ...1111111111111 EISIIMEIZEMMEECIIIIIIIIMEIM=1==MESEMMEEM=IMMMIIMMIMMEMNIMEMMENEIMIIIIZINI <0.1. <0,. .- .3111111111131k= Eli1=N11111=111MINIIIMMEMEMOINIIINEBIMMOIM=M11=•=1:1MMISMICEINIIICESIMIIMEEML11 .100 . .4INIMMIIEM 11101111115TEEMMEIEIMIXEMIIMIMEEINNIZINI:1111MWEEMMEIMMMIEEMINECEMMIIMAMMIEMIII=331•1 0, 121311E1ICEMICIEDIMEIBM=1:11EMMESIZEIMIEEMMEINIIIIIKEEMMEREINIMEIZEIMISIMMMEIEM <0 0. <0.100 L_ A .2.. CESECE=21.51-01-5MEEEMMESEEM=1:11£11•11113310MINSIMIIIIMICCEMINCEIZEMINESEIMI=MEGEmmamm .100 ,311111111111E14M1 I.-.•, .fl) lr. . .Wrt .P.. . .0 . .E.. . .111•1111114=1 1:13=2113211111EZIEN MN=MENEEM=0113MMEEMMEIMMMEIEllMMEEINMIIIIIMEM1111123EIMEIIIMMIEM <0.0 :" . 11111111111111111111111 MIMEO MEEMMEREEMMEMIIIIINEXIMMEIMMICIMMMEEIEEIMMEIEEMINIZIEEMMEEINIIMMEIM .100 <0,00 :1" 211111111111111111M 1:L=32:930111111:111EMICIESIIIIINIMEIIIMENEMMEEZINIIMMEMMESEEMMEIEMM=MME61311111•230111 <0.0. 00 1311= MiEMILIIIIICIIIENIIIIIIREMIIIIIEIMUZIEZNIIIIICEEMMEE11•11111MIMMEEMMIZEMMEIKINIIMEM:1111 <0.0 <0,00 __ .,..:1111111111111111111111111 CrIE= WEEEMMESEMMEIBEEM=CIEEMMEKEINIIIIIEWEINICHT11111111EXEMIMIMEMMEREMMEEMMEIMM <0 ..100 '.alifill1111111111/1=1 [1=MEGEKIMENM:IXEMM:13EM=ElitIMMESE311111111711111111111SLEMIIIIIRMEMMEIMMIIIEMMEEMMEIEM ion iM111111111111101•11111 1=021111113:E=IMIEEMMEIBEEMM:11EMMSEEZINNICEDZIIIMCCEITIIIMESENMEREMINENCEIN=121E=MENEM .100 " M111111111•11111MUMI IXEMEEIMMINN11MEEMSMEEMMIEIEM=116MM:111MM:IMEMMOZEMMEIMINIMIEZIEINNIMMIIIIMEEKIMMIEM=MIMMISIEML 7M/NNIMIIIIIECE1111111 =0:SIERECEN1116901111== ===CILMIE=MZEEMMEEINIIMEEMIIMCCEEMMIEHEMIMINI=MCIMINMEEZML,' All1111111 111=11=1=1111111 •IEENIIRUMINIMEDIEM=23EMIIMIEKEMME11==23EMMEIMMEMZEMMENCEINIIIIESEMIIIIIIMEM <0.1. 0,0 ...53111111111111111B1111111111 121=1212NiMIIMICIMEIMIEEM=CIEMINEKEZMMIDMM:CE1IMMIZIEEEINIKEZEMMEMMEICIMMIMIESCM <0.0 <0,00 1321:111= EZE§EIMESEM=1:MM=1===3:KMMEIM=CIEUMINICCINEIMIIIIECEI9MMIMMMEEMMEIZEM <0 1. <0.100 . EIM= IiMZEINECKEINMEIEEMIMEIM=mEgcmmareamCEMINIZEKM1112XEMMICEMIIMEIEM WEE= <0 • ..M111111111•11111931111•1 <0.1. LICIIIIIMIMEM111111 Et=IMIKEEMIIIIIMCCIENIIIIMIXIMIIIMEKEINIIIIIISIEMMEIDM=33:=MIMEMMESEEMMEIZEMIDE111111113312= <0 100 . • L., .a1111111111111111117111111111 MOIIIIIKEE111=1301111111:136.11111MEIERIIIIIMEIEMMEIRMTM=31FEEMINECIMEMMEEEMMIMIONICIENI <0 1. .1. 'FAINIMMUZMI 15=12EIZEDIZEIMIMMMEMM=EIIM=MMEEMINEIMMINEEIMIIELEE0111111:111MMSMEMMEEIMMIZEM <0.1. <0.0 ...1.91111111111.11•31En= 1021:1111211311111113EMME1==1:1103MMIEM=CIEMIIIILEIMINIEBEEMMEMMIZZINIMEIEMMEZM <0.1. <0,00 i:Z-1121111111=1113111111111 121212111111SIEE11111111M:1111111111ECIEMMIEMMIXIMMECIEEIIIIESEIMMENEEM <0,00 ___411111111111111111113E11111 MIMIEDE 1.01-02-MIE11111111:111M1=1:10:IMIIIMIEBIMINEEMMEEEMMIMEINIMIXEINMSEEMMICIEMM:=M <0.0 . Table 1 Sod Analytical Results Eisinger Meadows Orono.MN MMICINCESE2OMEREIRIES1IMEMEMEDIEM11116330111:EGIMICHEMSCEMEMICEM11111131131111MWEEMIE=M Compound/Parameter 11111 310-1499541 310-146954, 310-14.54,310-14995,1 310-14.545 310-150364-2 310-1503644 310.150364-3 310-150364.5 310-150364-6 310-150364-7 310-150364-1 310-1490546 mi. •..s=uproximmEarnammEmrs=1 owolrzols 03/01/2016 03/01201g 03/01/2019 03/01/2016 cniolrzols 03/01/2016 lapEgs, 6121=2 .1331EMMEIMMEIMIIMINMEMMEEE:MMIEEEMMIMMM:CEEMMEKEEMICOMENIMIMEMMUCEM .0.100 60 100 1=2!EEIMSECCISEMMOIEEINIIIIME=MIEMIIIIIMEEMINIXEINIIICCEEIMMEIESE111:31:13MINCCIEMMMErsi +.0 - Imitzma IMEIMEMIIMMIMOMMIESEEMMENEEMMZSEMMEKEN111111:11M1111:06:111MILIEEMMIEEMM=MMEIEENIMIESEEINI CO21=1:11•11E1M1NIZECCEIIIIIMEEMMIEEIM=EIMIMIIIIENZIMIIIIMEMIMEEE11.11111/CEMMEREMME1EMECIEEINIMIKEMMIIM. : 111111111111MEE3 I=SEINII=IIIIIMMEMINEEMINIIMEM=ff==3371111MM=EEMMEMNIIMMEMEE==11711111•=11111•111311111=11111111M47 11111111101ruM- 15111=111111EMMIIMEMMEEME/LIE.1111113I11111ELSEMmum•nammmscistommzemmuimenir 0Entim IZIMEEEEEIEMEMEINECCIIIIM=EINEMICIMIllIMEEIEMEMIIMMEMIN=ICIMMEIEMIMESIEMMEIEEMMZIEIMIIIIIIZE=11111111111E17 11111111111111MME CE12=!•11111131ZMIMMINIIIIIENEEM=EIKEMMILEMMEEEIIM=DIMIIIIICOMIIMIEIMMIEC:M=131:E=MXIMININNIEMINIE: L. ..11111111EMME ==12= Mil2EMEMSMIIMMET1111111111MEM=MEIMEMMICEIEMMEIREMMEMENI11111111EIMMWEEIMMEI:EMMZEININIMIZEMIIIIIL .:5111•11i1 1217111MIEEMINEMBIIIIINXIMIIIIKEZ=MIXIMM:CIEIERIMILEHOMMELEIM:, MKEE=WEEIMIIIMENIIIIMZEMINEIZEIMINft 1■1111=11111 IMMEIZISIIECUMEMICTIEN ilE11111•11===31:MINIZEIEM MEM=ME=MIAMI :11M13MI IMECIFE1=1111111111100191•311117====20=111111MEINIIIIIESEMMESEYM=3:121MMIZE=MIIMMIIIIIIMINIMIEIMMIEMMIEM:1111111111n._-.4211111111111M111111111 1=12190111EIMEDIENEIMINIIIIMI:393MMERIEMMEEllEINWEEMIINDEMB11111174i==:MIIM=13111111MIIIMI13= INEZININIIIIIIIMNINI 12=0:113EC=I1•211:1ENiKIM=312MENICKELIIIIIMIEELEM=IBM=1:1::MMIIMMIEEEMIIIIIIZEIMMEEEMMEEMMIEMIIII411111111=1111111111MXIIIIN 111911: 1353iMEIDEEN=IKIMI=EIHMIIMMEEMMEEIEMMEEIMIIIIEEIMIIMIX=MEEECINMEIGIMMIMEIMMIIIIIM==1:1111111111111111112:11111111111111111111E1111111 011:1711:11EE2KEEMIMMIEMMIECIIIIMEIMINIMEIZ:MMEEMMODMINICCIECNIIMWM1111213:=WEII=MENEEMMIZEIMIME111111111111111E21111111 71MENEM=1:11:12==1:11121MMICEMMIEM1111111111=2111111111 1:212111IIMENINCIMEM =EISEE=WECINI • =3113•11 Mill=MENEM MWIEMMZE=M111111011111111111M111111CIIIIMIll UMM!!1•111111=1111 IMMIEM 111111EIEMMEEM WEE= [EWIMMIIIIN=NEM MENEM MZEM MIMIIIINIIII1311111111111=1111111111 7.111101111•=1:11:=WEIN INICE=111110EINIMIIIIE1111111111111111111111311111•1 rir-4,17r,r7^1CIL "111111111111110111 cum Range Organ.(ORO)w, Aca•el deem• STLC13143 'S S2 "S 1790 20.4 577 .7 196 9960 164 19.6 1,1 NS NS • NE NE =33Z=M1113131= M:C!12EMMEIEIZM=EEIMMIZEECM WIESEN mninuomm 1. 121:95111EMEIMIE111111111EIMMICEEM=EIRM=IMEMZEMIIMMEZIMMSIEMMEEEMIN:CEIMEM =311M1111111111i1M. IM111M1 121333EIBMIEDIMEMNI=EEEM=133==iEIMIMILIM=CEIMMIXEIMMilEMMEIDEMEICCM:1111 113111110.11111111 GECKIE =311EMZEM=1111==1:13271111•315111111.1111311MMEIELENIMIECMMilEE=MEECEIIICIREM EMMA= IZEINIEUIS911MEMEM=Eln=MICIXIMIIIMMIEM=IEMMEIZEMM:CIMINIMEMEERSZN =MN MOM 123/01•111=1MCIIMIN111611:23111====:M=MIEMEMECIEllEEEERIMIESEM 6..20 INEEDE111 11111111K1,. ..1111 IMSECIMIllin=1:EEMEMIIIMODZIMMIKIMM 630707 IMMEM 0.702 6,0620 WM. <0,610 IIMMEMEIME---...sAlliellin 10313:1001119301M1=1111111121MMMEIMM INEIXIMMEMEIEMM=EMMIDOEM MOM MZEMMINGEINII.L_S13311111111=111111 GM=1:11=1111EICEIMMEI2=1:11==.-'4%--"1" .7.. 0.07. F7,1=ERIIIMISMEIMILIIIIM EMZEMEMZE=KIMEM111111111111311111.1 IZEGB5=1=3113MM:BEI.MIEC==013111111ril3MMSZEM=113:111111111513=111115701111=3:M=BillE0MIIITENIN 21:12112=1•1311%==133MMEEIE=11113SICE====.1110E11•11=611==13:1211111=31:=MIE=MICEMMIZIMIIIMZEM. ..= rE17112ItEESI=135=MIXIMIIIMIXIIIIIIIIIIIESMMEEMINELE111111MIZI=MWEE111:71111111MEIMIIIIIIIIIMIIMZEM: *.7,7117?..-151 IEIKEEEIESI=::CEPMMIEIZMIIIIIMICMMEC=RillpIII.Mi18EMIIWEW .. '17Y _ IIIMEEK=MEEMMZEINII: •rr-'11-147avtil II12212111MIZIEEFEJMITEEIM111===::91•11111111311M - :NOMEINICSE=ME12111111111•3111MMZEIM, IM11121115/EIECEMEEM=EIMMEEIDINIIMEIM =EI:MIIIIIIIMEIDEM=124Ei=n1=MEEMNIIMMMMIEM. Eztar[ssommummommmeamm=431E111M:€12==i1M=2:211111MEIMMENZEIIMMECIMMMEEINMIEMIIMI .. usuraumainicummnummzu ..100 .100 .1.0 <0.+00 immummiaimmzummazinumzim!. ESEEIIIIMIREEZESIMIliiMMIEMEIMMIMIIIIIICEMOMMMIONIZIMIMZE= 0201) MIUMMZEINE 11=15=MOZIIIIIIMZEM "171-11,M1 Notes NT 9 Not tested NE 9 Not Established NS 9 Not Sampled <9 1.839 than the reporting brnit Bold o detected concentration Table 2 Groundwater Analytical Results Eisinger Meadows Orono,MN B-2 13-3 13-4 B-5 B-10 Trip Blank MN-DOH Compound/Parameter CAS No. 310-149954-8 310-149954-9 310-149954-10310-149954-11 310-150364-8 310-149954-7 HumanHlth 02/21/2019 02/21/2019 02/21/2019 02/21/2019 03/01/2019 02/21/2019 WaterGuid 2016 _ Volatiles(ug/L) .,. - 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 630-20-6 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 70 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 71-55-6 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 9000 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 79-34-5 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 2 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 79-00-5 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 3 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane 76-13-1 <2.00 <2.00 <2.00 <2.00 <2.00 <2.00 200000 1,1-Dichloroethane 75-34-3 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 80 1,1-Dichloroethene 75-35-4 <2.00 <2.00 <2.00 <2.00 <2.00 <2.00 200 1,1-Dichloropropene 563-58-6 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 87-61-6 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 _ NE _ 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 96-18-4 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 0.003 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120-82-1 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 4 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 95-63-6 <1.00 17.1 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 100 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 96-12-8 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 NE 1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) 106-93-4 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 __ <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 0.004 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 95-50-1 <1.00 4.06 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 600 1,2-Dichloroethane 107-06-2 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 1 1,2-Dichloropropane 78-87-5 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 5 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 108-67-8 <1.00 5.73 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 100 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 541-73-1 <1.00 2.18 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 NE 1,3-Dichloropropane 142-28-9 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 NE 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 106-46-7 <1.00 6.54 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 10 , 2,2-Dichloropropane 594-20-7 <4.00 <4.00 <4.00 <4.00 <4.00 <4.00 NE 2-Butanone(MEK) 78-93-3 <10.0 <10.0 <10.0 <10.0 <10.0 <10.0 4000 2-Chlorotoluene 95-49-8 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 NE 4-Chlorotoluene _ 106-43-4 <1.00 _ <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 NE 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) 108-10-1 <10.0 <10.0 <10.0 <10.0 <10.0 <10.0 300 ` Acetone 67-64-1 <10.0 11.9 <10.0 <10.0 <10.0 <10.0 4000 Allyl chloride 107-05-1 <2.00 <2.00 <2.00 <2.00 <2.00 <2.00 30 Benzene 71-43-2 <0.500 3.24 <0.500 <0.500 <0.500 <0.500 2 Bromobenzene 108-86-1 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 NE Bromochloromethane 74-97-5 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 NE Bromodichloromethane 75-27-4 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 6 Bromoform 75-25-2 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 40 Bromomethane 74-83-9 <4.00 <4.00 <4.00 <4.00 <4.00 <4.00 10 Carbon tetrachloride 56-23-5 <2.00 <2.00 <2.00 <2.00 <2.00 <2.00 1 Chlorobenzene 108-90-7 <1.00 3.04 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 100 Chlorodibromomethane 124-48-1 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 10 Chloroethane 75-00-3 <4.00 <4.00 <4.00 <4.00 <4.00 <4.00 NE Chloroform 67-66-3 <3.00 <3.00 <3.00 <3.00 <3.00 <3.00 30 Chloromethane 74-87-3 <3.00 <3.00 <3.00 <3.00 <3.00 <3.00 NE cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 156-59-2 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 6 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-01-5 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 NE Dibromomethane 74-95-3 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 NE Dichlorodifluoromethane 75-71-8 <3.00 <3.00 <3.00 <3.00 <3.00 <3.00 700 Dichlorofluoromethane 75-43-4 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 30 Diethyl ether 60-29-7 16.2 <2.00 <2.00 <2.00 <2.00 <2.00 200 Ethylbenzene 100-41-4 <1.00 3.98 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 50 Hexachlorobutadiene 87-68-3 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 1 Isopropylbenzene 98-82-8 <1.00 1.51 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 300 Methyl tert-butyl ether 1634-04-4 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 60 Methylene Chloride 75-09-2 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 5 Naphthalene 91-20-3 <5.00 6.29 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 70 n-Butylbenzene 104-51-8 <1.00 1.09 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 NE N-Propylbenzene 103-65-1 <1.00 2.16 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 NE p-Isopropyltoluene 99-87-6 <1.00 5.33 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 NE sec-Butylbenzene 135-98-8 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 NE Styrene 100-42-5 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 NE tert-Butylbenzene 98-06-6 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 NE Tetrachloroethene 127-18-4 <l.00 <l.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 4 Tetrahydrofuran 109-99-9 <10.0 <10.0 <10.0 <10.0 <10.0 <10.0 600 Toluene 108-88-3 <1.00 2.08 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 200 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 156-60-5 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 40 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 10061-02-6 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 <5.00 NE Trichloroethene 79-01-6 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 0.4 Trichlorofluoromethane 75-69-4 <4.00 <4.00 <4.00 <4.00 <4.00 <4.00 2000 Vinyl chloride 75-01-4 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 <1.00 0.2 Xylenes,Total 1330-20-7 <3.00 20.1 <3.00 <3.00 <3.00 <3.00 300 Table 2 Groundwater Analytical Results Eisinger Meadows Orono,MN B-2 B-3 B-4 B-5 B-10 Trip Blank MN-DOH Compound/Parameter CAS No. 310-149954-8 310-149954-9 310-149954-10310-149954-11 310-150364-8 310-149954-7 HumanHlth 02/21/2019 02/21/2019 02/21/2019 02/21/2019 03/01/2019 02/21/2019 WaterGuid 2016 GC Volatiles(ug/L), ..,. .. ,, - m Wisconsin GRO I STL01887 I <100 I <100 I <100 I <100 I <100 I <100 I.. NE; • J. S e m i vo lati l es(ug/L) 2-Methylnaphthalene 91-57-6 <1.12 <1.06 <1.05 <1.05 <1.20 NS 8 '- Acenaphthene 83-32-9 <1.12 2.94 <1.05 <1.05 <1.20 NS 100 Acenaphthylene 208-96-8 <1.12 <1.06 <1.05 <1.05 <1.20 NS NE Anthracene 120-12-7 <1.12 1.69 <1.05 <1.05 <1.20 NS :00 2000 Benzo[a]anthracene 56-55-3 <1.12 2.67 <1.05 <1.05 <1.20 NS ': ` NE Benzo[a]pyrene 50-32-8 <1.12 2.08 <1.05 <1.05 <1.20 NS 0.06 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 205-99-2 <1.12 2.91 <1.05 <1.05 <1.20 NS NE Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 191-24-2 <1.12 1.25 <1.05 <1.05 <1.20 NS NE Benzo[k]fluoranthene 207-08-9 <1.12 1.27 <1.05 <1.05 <1.20 NS NE Chrysene 218-01-9 <1.12 3.94 <1.05 <1.05 <1.20 NS NE Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 53-70-3 <1.12 <1.06 <1.05 <1.05 <1.20 NS NE Fluoranthene 206-44-0 <1.12 7.79 <1.05 <1.05 <1.20 NS 70 Fluorene 86-73-7 <1.12 2.34 <1.05 <1.05 <1.20 NS R,300 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 193-39-5 <1.12 1.35 <1.05 <1.05 <1.20 NS .`R='.NE Naphthalene 91-20-3 <5.62 5.64 <5.26 <5.26 <6.02 NS x:70-. Phenanthrene 85-01-8 <1.12 6.18 <1.05 <1.05 <1.20 NS h-<NE - Pyrene 129-00-0 <1.12 5.85 <1.05 <1.05 <1.20 NS 50,C GCfSemiVolatiles(ug/L) :k.,L, .» -in Diesel Range Organics(DRO)w/ .. <120 581 204 175 <128 NS silica gel cleanup STL00143 .NE: Dissolved Metals(mg/L)'r ;;'-..i',. 4;a4,,, > ;:'-4, ',< g =,, Arsenic 7440-38-2 0.00898 <0.00200 0.00253 <0.00200 <0.00200 NS 001a , Barium 7440-39-3 0.893 0.784 0.207 0.484 0.360 NS '--, Cadmium 7440-43-9 <0.000500 <0.000500 <0.000500 <0.000500 <0.000500 NS 0.0005 Chromium 7440-47-3 <0.00500 <0.00500 <0.00500 <0.00500 <0.00500 NS 63E:-:-. Lead 7439-92-1 <0.000500 <0.000500 <0.000500 0.000580 <0.000500 NS 0.015` Mercury 7439-97-6 <0.000200 <0.000200 <0.000200 <0.000200 <0.000200 NS 0.0023 0 Selenium 7782-49-2 <0.00500 <0.00500 <0.00500 <0.00500 <0.00500 NS 0.03 x' Silver 7440-22-4 <0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00100 <0.00100 NS 0.03'- Notes: NE=Not Established NS=Not Sampled <=Less than the reporting limit Bold=detected concentration Exceedance a.' a=EPA Maximum Contaminate Limit b=HRL for Chromium VI c=EPA Maxiumum Contaminate Limit at the tap Table 3-Soil Vapor Analtyical Results Eisinger Meadows Orono,MN Sample Identifier and Date Colkc[ed _'" ®®®®111MEEZM®NEZIEM®' ®®®®1130_ IIIEMMICMIZIEZIEDICEIMICEMEZIIIMEMICECEICEIZZIIIMMICEIZIEZEIMMICOMMIIIEIMcompounamarameter � .naaitlantial lsv CAS No. 111111111111111111111111111111111111111 uePod 'f 1'9 Volatile Organic Compnuntls Method t0-15 reported in uglm] ®®MIEN ®®®®®®®® :." 185.006'. 1EZESE12111112111®MENNIIIMMENICOINIENNEENZIIIIIIIIMIIMMERNMENZIM®i ®®mtri®®®®®®®®®®®®® 1.1-0Ichloroethane MEMENUMEIM®EMMEM®11113111111EIMMEMINEIMMIIMEMEMMEIM®IIME 16566 1,1-Dichloroethene EZZENTENNEE®REIZZEN MEINECIIIIEIMICENZENNES®NEEMBE MIN 111111:116.800 1,2.4Tritliloroberizene • ®®®®®®®®®®®®®®®® r 1119211=111 95-63-6 1 2 D'bromoethare • ®®113111®®®®®®®®® MEMS102111111MCIE f 2 Dichlorobenzene _®®NEEN®®®®®®®®® 1 2 Dichloroethane MICEINECIMMEIN®1111111111:111111113M MICIENEEMEIM� -,_,.,;���� '' 12-Dlchloropropane ��®®���������emmenmemires 2-9lchoratetrefluoramethane ®®®mmm®m®' ®3'' ®®'' EI ®MEN 'm' 1111 ®®ini®®inzeumponntrileasemm. 1 NEEIMillitilliENEIMiNiliMMEMNIainumossigiiiiiiimmitriommzumannostaiirammummeEms 1,4Dichloraberizene '®' ®®anz®®®®®®®®®®®Esti® •r mEIN®®®mMEMMEM MEM': 5,006 85,006 2-Hexanon (methy butyl ketone) mm�mmm mmmmmm m��� 1.000 EIMEIMEINZIEEIMINESIIMIEMEMEEMEINE:11111111211MEZZEIEm® NE MIMI mm�mmmm mmmmmm m�®5. "�a .to 99 . itsraseics©mosci®®' 1111' ®®�m®' ® ': 1_,660; A f=t Y' el...:. 1111`."1e ,1 Pi •' '112 MEMBEZE® :.? .:� '1111' �.5 .,i.Yt ia,!1 immxiscssonmsuitirimomensmiliseii iinsucMalairemotsocsiiiinnzsieniume• "Nam aromodtnmromemaae ®®®®®®MEM= ®®�® z® ®®®IZIMI®®®®®®®®®®®115E1IEW c. 111EZ1111 caroon tlawrae EsErmsmastamomosimmE0NEs®NENEINNEENszsmnoszonts® z/,1a6 Carbon[etrachlor de mammossioniesionselmeameamosmiusaissemeamessosimeammozwELL •, %� CNorobenzene 08-30-] EZIMEM®NIMEME1121111:1•11EMEME:11E112111153MEMEEEMMEZ®L ' .. ®§ 33.000 112211111:11111111:011113EMEMEIZEIMMIZEZILIPIIIIITMEZENIEINEEMIIITIELILL-MCW::::_:,h __:]11111111:111 ast 2 D'chbrcetherie IIIMMENIZE111011®MEMEMINEZNICIECOIMENIEMENSZm1111211111111SEEM®L` 1 960' ast}gytbropropene 0061-6i 5 EM111111131111EZEMEMEMEMEMIIMMIIIMEMZEIIIIIIIIIIIIEM®®C660 ' E111211ZIN®EME11111112111mNIEIZEINE' MEIN®' mZEIZEINEMS®iP�.:+: #i 198000 Dbromochloromethana • ®®�®®®®®®®®®®®®®Ccs D'chlorotl'Ouoromethane ®®�®®�®®®®' ®' ma ®®�®�'.r' 6,690 EMZEmEIMmm1.:111®m®m®®m®' ®ETIN®(x Farr:All 63,000 ' ®®MEN®®®®®®®®®®®MITII®' 996A00 Hexachlorobutadiene • ®®MIE®®®®®®®®®®®ZEM® 1 Isopropyl alcohol 62-63-0 m1EIMmNICI®MIENNIENIIIIIEMMEMMESSEEMIISEINEM®' EN® "' 231,000 Table 3-Soil Vapor Analtyical Results Eisinger Meadows Orono,MN sample Identifier and Dale collected ®®®®EME@S®EMI EZEM®' ®®®®EE11_ Residential CIZEIIMMEMINMEM'®'®®®.®®.®.® EZEIMME1101_. IntrtiSi.oe 330 Compound/Parameter LAS o. ®®®®®®®®®®®®®®® Lim rt y pghdSV Resi"/im3 I5V . ®®EEM®®®®®®®®®®®EU® 20'4'r... 21.000. amszminTsielmeammonmszaeumesmeaszammaiumsseaseameasestmommin 3,000 24000 111111ZEIMM®EMEIME®' EIMEZE®IIIMINZEMEn®' EMI NMI 1=INIEME' ®'' EIN®' ® mm111MEU®' MEZEN66 �g 2.000 .000 .. - - �m®' mmmm®" mmmmm®' ��" € 3A00 r.', 99A00 111:2111WIENTIEEMEMINEIMEMIIIMEMEMINICIEMENZIMMINEEMEIIIIIIMI111:11• 1,000 33.000 .. 704998 ZIESEEIMMIENZIENICEIRE11112:11ZEMMEINIZZ EMm® ®®MMIN®' ESE=EMMEN=MEI ZEIMEMEDIIIIIMEM®EMElln 165.D00 tans-l,2-Oitlibroelhene manseunamm®nizmecoszonzmossectiermenzumazonzonzorc1980 trans-1 3-0 hloropropene 10061-02-6 EIIMEMEMINE11111E31111111=MICEZEMEMEINEM®MEMINEMI®KCE 6ed Tr loroethene ®' ®®m ®®®®®®0. w 3®®®® rreNoronnoromemaneMETE®®ZIE®®®®®®mm®®®EM® �� ���������®01 IME ®� .t 6 6d ION MEM 1:1= MIEMEMICIEMICEIMEMIEMECEMEM111071113111111ESIEMIIIMIEMEMEIV' "ECM III MEM Methane by Method EPA 3C reported in%vN -II=11=11:=I®EZE 029 50.056 OA1 a1:121EZI'...'.....KEE no 062 c0.055 0:1 _. NE Hydrogen Sulfide by Method EPA 1516 reported in ppm vlv rermicernranwamerameamecorriermenciurainzammineamecrimimres ma= 4-Gas Mele1 Results ©ma©ao©oma©mm©©ma®® Hydrogen Sulfide 16201 Meter Results omMMMENE 000000ma®® Notes: NM=Not measured due to tight soils and meter pump alarm ppm=parts per million Isv=Invasion screening value LEL=Lower explosive limit Soot=volatile organic Compounds pg/m'=micrograms per cubic meter NE=Not Established %v/v=percent volume by volume X7.9=Not Detected above laboratory reporting limits =based on total xylenes 000/1330-20-7 =Interim Isv value Appendix A Soil Boring Logs and Soil Vapor Sampling Forms Iri‘v 9WENCK LOG OF BORING B-1 Responsive partner. Exceptional outcomes. (Page 1 of 1) Eisinger Meadows Date Started :02/21/19 Operator :Todd Environmental Investigation Date Completed :02/21/19 Water Level :Not Observed 3245 Wayzata Boulevard W Contractor :Range Logged By :CJA Orono, MN 55356 Drilling Method :Push Probe Checked By :MH Project#B5503-0003 Sampling Method :Dual-Tube Water Levels Water Level Z Boring Depth:30' Estimated Depth of Fill:1' E a cr) v m > U - = > = E 0 W co a cn 0 a L o oDESCRIPTION 0a (13 0—994 Fill TOPSOIL, organic silt,slight sand and clay, black,frozen(Fill) SANDY CLAY,trace gravel,trace to moderate orange redox staining,stiff, brown, 0.0 frozen to slightly moist(Till) 0.1 5—989 0.1 5-10' 0.1 10—984 m 0.1 m O - N 0.1 0 15—979 SC a a> a 0.1 Becoming moist and very stiff with increasing plasticity @ 17' 0.1 3° 20—974 a O 0.1 O5, - w - c - 0.1 7 25—969 0.1 m _ a 0.1 30—964 SAND,fine to medium grained, brown,dry(Outwash) End of boring @ 30' I J S 0 n _ 35— No waste observed. SO v^v WENCKvAilkv LOG OF BORING B-2 Responsive partner. Exceptional outcomes. (Page 1 of 1) Eisinger Meadows Date Started :02/21/19 Operator :Todd Environmental Investigation Date Completed :02/21/19 Water Level :15.8' 3245 Wayzata Boulevard W Contractor :Range Logged By :CJA Orono, MN 55356 Drilling Method :Push Probe Checked By :MH Project#B5503-0003 Sampling Method :Dual-Tube I Water Levels m Water Level Boring Depth:30' I-- Estimated Depth of Fill:22.3' c d ai CO " C u. _ E C s W U < J D: w ro o conn D CL DESCRIPTION U) a 0—987 Fill TOPSOIL,organic silt,slight sand and clay,black,frozen(Fill) SANDY CLAY,some gravel,slight organics,stiff,dark brown,frozen(Fill) 0.1 Fill 0.1 5—982 SANDY CLAY,some organics,slight gravel,slight orgainc odor,trace petroleum odor, dark brown/black with grey and green staining,slightly moist(Fill) 1.2 Fill 0.7 m 10—977 Partially decomposed wood observed @ 10' - ORGANIC CLAY,sandy,some silt,some wood, moderate organic odor,soft,black, - slightly moist(Fill) m Fill Likely in waste @ 10'(low recovery no waste observed in sample) 2.2 o - N rx Q - 0 15—972 0.v ORGANIC CLAY, sandy/silty,some partially decomposed wood,slight plastic,strong y ce - waste odors,black, moist(Fill) C O o) Fill 15-20' 7.8 13' - N C 0 20—967 1,9 PEAT,slight wood,trace plastic,black,very moist(Fill) - Fill 1.3 m - Wet lense observed from 22 to 22.3 feet - w - PT PEAT,soft,black,very moist(Peat) o 2.0 SANDY CLAY,slight gravel,stiff,gray,moist to very moist(Till) 25—962 `o 0.2 c m a o _ 0.2 End of boring @ 30' 0 30—957 N Y N J O v) t0 (0 rU 35— U Ul ~ Cover approximately 0 to 10 feet. m Waste approximately 10 to 22.3 feet. E) Collected groundwater sample from temporary well screened from 15 to 25 °; feet. M 0 vakv TAT WENCK LOG OF BORING B-3 Responsive partner. Exceptional outcomes. (Page 1 of 1) Eisinger Meadows Date Started :02/21/19 Operator :Todd Environmental Investigation Date Completed :02/21/19 Water Level :14.0' 3245 Wayzata Boulevard W Contractor :Range Logged By :CJA Orono, MN 55356 Drilling Method :Push Probe Checked By :MH Project#B5503-0003 Sampling Method :Dual-Tube Water Levels Water Levelns - Boring Depth:30' a) Estimated Depth of Fill:24.5' c a a aa) rn a) u u_ j c) p_ 7 N c a) — E m J .c W cn a cn a %E U Q o co cn D i:C DESCRIPTION a 0—987 F,ii TOPSOIL,organic silt,slight sand and clay, black,frozen(Fill) / SANDY CLAY,some gravel,trace bituminous material,stiff,dark brown/black,frozen 0.1 - (Fill) Fill 1.3 5—982 SANDY CLAY,soft,brown,slightly moist(Fill) - Fill 0.1 _ Fill SANDY CLAY,soft,gray,slightly moist(Fill) PEAT,slight partially decomposed wood, black, moist(Fill) 0.3 u - Fill m 10—977 o ORGANIC SILT,some clay,some plastic,glass,fabric and partially decomposed wood, strong organic odor,soft,black,moist(Fill) 0.3 Fill E - _oi 12.5-15' 1.7 _Z 2 0 15—972 ORGANIC CLAYEY SILT, peat in part, black,wet(Fill) ce - 0.2 Mainly partially decomposed wood observed from 17 to 19' m Fill - Concrete observed from 19 to 20' 0.6 N O 20—967 gi ORGANIC CLAY, some wood,slight peat,trace plastic and concrete,soft,black,wet 2 - (Fill) 1.1 °' Fill i,w - t 0.3 a m 25—962 PEAT,some mostly decomposed wood and roots,slight silt,soft,black and dark brown, - slightly moist(Peat) PT 0.2 2 - - PT PEAT some silt,common white mollusk(snail)shells,soft, black,slightly moist(Peat) 0.2 End of boring @ 30' a 30—957 ✓ _ J 0 - O N h - N U t 35— Cover approximately 0 to 10 feet. Waste approximately 10 to 24.5 feet. N Collected groundwater sample from temporary well screened from 14 to 24 a; feet. co 0 `WILY TAT WENCK LOG OF BORING B-4 Responsive partner. Exceptional outcomes. (Page 1 of 1) Eisinger Meadows Date Started :02/21/19 Operator :Todd Environmental Investigation Date Completed :02/21/19 Water Level :13.65 3245 Wayzata Boulevard W Contractor :Range Logged By :CJA Orono, MN 55356 Drilling Method :Push Probe Checked By :MH Project#B5503-0003 Sampling Method :Dual-Tube Water Levels _ Water Level ns Z Boring Depth:25' a) Estimated Depth of Fill:22' c a_ Iii co a) rn a) — a) LL U n > .B a> T E � L W U Q U) EY ;15 o conn D CC DESCRIPTION W a co 0—987 ORGANIC SILT,some clay in part,slight roots,soft,black,moist(Fill) a.o - Fill 0.0 5—982 0.0 - SAND with silt,clay and organics,common plastic,partially decomposed wood and 0.5 li - Fill glass,slight waste odor,black,moist(Fill) m 10—977 o ORGANIC CLAYEY SILT,common plastic,glass,fabric and partially decomposed wood, - strong waste and chemical odor,soft,black,moist(Fill) 1.7 Fill CV 12.5-15' 4.3 2 15—972 a ORGANIC SILT,some clay,plastic,concrete and partially decomposed wood, moderate organic odor,black,wet(Fill) C O _ m Fill 0.2 C - E 20—967 ORGANIC SILTY CLAY,some gravel,soft,black,wet(Fill) 2 - _ Fill 1.3 0 m - N SANDY CLAY,trace gravel,stiff,gray,moist(TIII) LT, - SC 0.9 mEnd of boring @ 25' •7 25—962 C C tV a - 0 30 957 0 J M - O Lo LO - 'a U t 35— U d Cover approximately 0 to 8 feet. Z 0, Waste approximately 8 to 22 feet. E Collected groundwater sample from temporary well screened from 10 to 20 N feet. Co 0 lirj‘T WENCK LOG OF BORING B-5 Responsive partner. Exceptional outcomes. (Page 1 of 1) Eisinger Meadows Date Started :02/21/19 Operator :Todd Environmental Investigation Date Completed :02/21/19 Water Level :13.45 3245 Wayzata Boulevard W Contractor :Range Logged By :CJA Orono, MN 55356 Drilling Method :Push Probe Checked By :MH Project#B5503-0003 Sampling Method :Dual-Tube Water Levels T Water Level Boring Depth:30' a> Estimated Depth of Fill:22.5' E o_ m m — a. a) a> m co J w cn o cn CC Q t C Q y DED co SCRIPTION 0 a03 0—986 CLAYEY SAND,some silt and gravel, slight organics,dark brown,frozen(Fill) 0.1 Fill 0.1 5-981 3 inch recovery due to rock in sample shoe.dark brown clayey sand and black peat Fill 0.4 m 10—976 PEAT, soft,black, moist(Fill) Fill Potentially in waste @ 10' 0.4 0) ORGANIC SILT,some gravel, plastic,glass,shinny bituminous/ash material,fabric and 0.1 Fill partially decomposed wood, moderate waste odor, black, moist(Fill) 0 15-971 ORGANIC SILT,some gravel,glass,orange flakes,partially decomposed wood, - moderate organic and waste odor,black,wet(Fill) 0 0.2 Fill O 20—966 Becoming with slight concrete©20' 20-22.5' 2.4 - PEAT,some mostly decomposed wood and roots,slight silt,soft, black and dark brown, _ dry(Peat) 0.4 25—961 PT Becoming mainly dark brown @ 25' 0.4 m _ PEAT,slight silt, common white mollusk(snail)shells,soft,black,dry(Peat) PT 0.1 0 30—956 End of boring @ 30' v - Co O c0 t 35— Cover approximately 0 to 13 feet.Waste approximately 13 to 22.5 feet. Waste potentially begins around 10 feet,minimal sample recovery from 5 to 10 feet and low recovery(3 feet)from 10 to 15 feet. Collected groundwater sample from temporary well screened from 13 to 23 2 feet. wWENCKvikv LOG OF BORING B-6 Responsive partner. Exceptional outcomes. (Page 1 of 1) Eisinger Meadows Date Started :03/01/19 Operator :Todd Environmental Investigation Date Completed :03/01/19 Water Level :Not Measured 3245 Wayzata Boulevard W Contractor :Range Logged By :CJA Orono,MN 55356 Drilling Method :Push Probe Checked By :MH Project#B5503-0003 Sampling Method :Dual-Tube Water Levels _ I Water Level (0 jr_ Boring Depth:30' m - Estimated Depth of Fill:27' cd ti a rn cu rn cuw a) c N 0 Ew J CO CD -c W (0 0- CO W 45 m = u) o u) D DESCRIPTION in a 0—991 SANDY CLAY,some gravel and organics,stiff,dark brown/black,frozen to moist(Fill) 0.0 Fill 0.0 5—986 ORGANIC SILT, peat in part, moderate organic odor,soft,black,moist(Fill) 0.0 Fill 0.0 (Si 10—981 ORGANIC SILTY CLAY,some sand,slight wood,trace gravel, moderate waste odor, - soft, black, moist(Fill) 0.1 a - 66 Fill N o0.1 Q _ m O 15—976 ORGANIC SANDY CLAY,some glass,plastic and partially decomposed wood,moderate ry - waste odor,soft,black,moist(Fill) 0.1 ) _ Fill - 5 0.3 0 20—971 Ti ORGANIC SILT,some wood,glass and partially decomposed waste, moderate waste 2 - odor,soft,black,moist to wet(Fill) 0.2 g _ W o Fill 22.5-25' 3.4 m 25—966 —`o - 0.8 c m - PT PEAT,some mostly decomposed wood and roots,slight silt,soft,black and dark brown, EC_ - slightly moist(Peat) / 3 0.0 - SC SANDY CLAY,trace gravel,stiff,gray, moist(Till) N 30—961 End of boring @ 30' , 0 Y J O [0 U r 35— U Ul Cover approximately 0 to 10 feet. 0 Waste approximately 10 to 27 feet. N No groundwater sample collected at this location. m N M 0 Tj VAT WENCK LOG OF BORING B-7 Responsive partner. Exceptional outcomes. (Page 1 of 1) Eisinger Meadows Date Started :03/01/19 Operator :Todd Environmental Investigation Date Completed :03/01/19 Water Level :Not Measured 3245 Wayzata Boulevard W Contractor :Range Logged By :CJA Orono, MN 55356 Drilling Method :Push Probe Checked By :MH Project#B5503-0003 Sampling Method :Dual-Tube Water Levels V Water Level Boring Depth:30' ilo Estimated Depth of Fill:28' . a. a) am a) m C d) — E 0 a) L di C) Q J o u) D CC DESCRIPTION co a 0—986 ORGANIC SILT,some clay,dark brown/black,frozen(Fill) 0.0 - Fill _ 0.0 Fill SANDY CLAY,some gravel and organics,brown,moist(Fill) 5—981 ORGANIC SILT,some clay and wood,moderate waste odor,slight petroleum odor,soft, black,moist(Fill) - Fill 5-10' 15.8 Pi m 10—976 ORGANIC SILT,some sand,slight wood, plastic and debris,moderate waste odor,soft, - black,very moist(Fill) m Fill 3.4 o - cc 15—971 V ORGANIC SILT,some glass,plastic and partially decomposed wood,strong waste odor, - slight sheen,soft,black,wet(Fill) o _ m Fill 15-20' 22.7 m c - N E 20—966 ai ORGANIC SILT,with wood, black,wet(Fill) 2 - c 1.9 vi w - - Fill m 13 25—961 0.6 c m c m a - 8PEAT,some silt, common white mollusk(snail)shells,soft,black,slightly moist(Peat) 0 0 PT 0 30—956 End of boring @ 30' 0 J O N N t0 U t 35— Cover approximately 0 to 5 feet. Waste approximately 5 to 28 feet. N No groundwater sample collected at this location. N M 0 WENCK LOG OF BORING B-8 vAy Responsive partner. Exceptional outcomes. (Page 1 of 1) Eisinger Meadows Date Started :03/01/19 Operator :Todd Environmental Investigation Date Completed :03/01/19 Water Level :Not Measured 3245 Wayzata Boulevard W Contractor :Range Logged By :CJA Orono,MN 55356 Drilling Method :Push Probe Checked By :MH Project#B5503-0003 Sampling Method :Dual-Tube Water Levels V Water Level Boring Depth:25' Z a) iv Estimated Depth of Fill:20' c o- m ca — a a) rn a) a) c Q) -c LLJ (.1) d ( J Q U < oDESCRIPTION0 a 0—992 SANDY CLAY,some sand and gravel,stiff,dark brown frozen to moist(Fill) 0.0 Fill 0.0 5—987 ORGANIC SILT,some sand,soft, black, moist(Fill) 0.0 Fill ORGANIC SANDY CLAY,some wood,trace glass,and plastic,moderate waste odor, 0.1 m 10—982 soft, black,moist(Fill) Becoming with occasional brick and moderate bitouminous odor @ 10' _Q - m 0.1 o - Fill 15—977 CD15-17.5' 0.6 V ORGANIC SILT,some wood,glass and partially decomposed waste, moderate waste 0 0 3 - Fill odor,soft,black,moist to wet(Fill) $ 20—972 SANDY CLAY,trace gravel,stiff,brown, moist(Till) o.o y SC iu - a.o End of boring©25' 25—967 C _ t C tV - 2 a 0 30—962 >N _ l0 O U 35- -17- 5— . Cover approximately 0 to 8.5 feet. Waste approximately 8.5 to 20 feet. N No groundwater sample collected at this location. 0 Tov WENCK LOG OF BORING B-9 TAT Responsive partner. Exceptional outcomes. (Page 1 of 1) Eisinger Meadows Date Started :03/01/19 Operator :Todd Environmental Investigation Date Completed :03/01/19 Water Level :Not Measured 3245 Wayzata Boulevard W Contractor :Range Logged By :CJA Orono, MN 55356 Drilling Method :Push Probe Checked By :MH Project#B5503-0003 Sampling Method :Dual-Tube Water Levels Water Level Z Boring Depth:30' a) Estimated Depth of Fill:18' c o_ m rn - d a� rn 82 a� LL U 0 > c m = E n .c W Ul CL n t U Q D DESCRIPTION a 1,6 0—992 SILTY SAND,some clay,gravel and organics, moderate organic odor,stiff dark brown/black,frozen to moist(Fill) 0.6 Fill 0.2 5—987 ORGANIC SANDY CLAY,some silt and organics, moderate organic odor,slight bituminous odor, black, moist(Fill) 0.7 Fill 0.5 • m 10—982 9-10' o ORGANIC SILT,some sand and gravel,some concrete,wood,glass, plastic, brick and limestone,soft, black,slightly moist(Fill) 0.2 Fill o - N 0.3 2 15—977 ORGANIC CLAY,some sand,some glass, plastic and partially decomposed wood,dark Fill O brown/gray, moist to very moist(Fill) 0.1 1,1 SANDY CLAY,trace gravel, slight redox staining,stiff, brown,slightly moist to dry(Till) 0.0 20—972 2 0.0 W - SC 0.0 .t 25—967 0.0 9 a Lei _ 0.0 30—962 End of boring @ 30' M - 35— Cover approximately 0 to 9 feet. Waste approximately 9 to 18 feet. N No groundwater sample collected at this location. 0 vItv VAV WENCK LOG OF BORING B-10 Responsive partner. Exceptional outcomes. (Page 1 of 1) Eisinger Meadows Date Started :03/01/19 Operator :Todd Environmental Investigation Date Completed :03/01/19 Water Level :21.4' 3245 Wayzata Boulevard W Contractor :Range Logged By :CJA Orono,MN 55356 Drilling Method :Push Probe Checked By :MH Project#B5503-0003 Sampling Method :Dual-Tube Water Levels _ Water Level ns Z Boring Depth:30' aa) co Estimated Depth of Fill:4' E d rn a) m u_ > U a_ = > E a) _ E CO J CO t W (n 0_ CO W 7 LE o u) D DESCRIPTION a aa) 0—994 SANDY CLAY,some black organic silt in part,some gravel,dark brown, black,frozen to moist(Fill) 0.0 - Fill 0-5' _ 0.0 SANDY CLAY,trace gravel,trace to moderate orange redox staining,stiff,brown, 5—989 ,, slightly moist(Till) - f 0.0 _ - 0.0 I 10—984 Becoming very stiff @ 10' o _ 0.0 o - SC m N CO 0.0 Q - 2 O 15—979 Becoming with trace very moist sand lenses at 15' 0.05 td - 0.0 a 20—974 III SANDY CLAY,ocassional wet sand lenses,stiff, brown,moist/wet(Till) - 0.0 T SC/SP W - 0.a - 25—969 > SANDY CLAY,trace gravel,very stiff, brown, moist(Till) o.o C SC a - o _ 0.0 End of boring @ 30' N 30—964 3 is J M - O i.U li r 35— iii Cover approximately 0 to 4 feet. No waste observed. rn E Collected groundwater sample from temporary well screened from 18.5 to 28.5 g feet. M 0 velkAv ol WENCK Soil Vapor Sampling (Purgerecomme2vnded)umes(min.)to 5 volumes Form Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. Tubing Diam.(ID) Volume(ml)/foot Project Name: Eisinger Meadows Investigation .06(1/16)inch 0.56 Project Number: B5503-0003 .12(1/8)inch 2.22 Project Location 3245 Wayzata Boulevard W.Orono,MN .19(3/16)inch 5.58 Field Technician: Cory Anderson and Joel Barthel .25(1/4)inch 9.65 Contractor: Range Environmental .31 (3/8)inch 14.84 Sample ID SV-1 SV-2 SV-3 SV-4 SV-5 Date 2/27/2019 2/27/2019 See Notes 2/27/2019 2/27/2019 Location See Map See Map See Map See Map See Map Sample Depth 8-10 4-6 -- 8-10 5-10 Sampling Method,i.e. Geoprobe PRT Geoprobe PRT -- Geoprobe PRT Geoprobe PRT Geoprobe PRT Bentonite Surface Seal? Yes Yes -- Yes Yes Summa Canister Size 1L 1L -- 1L 1L Summa Canister Number 6294 6358 -- 6351 5891 Flow Restrictor?Number? 6507 4687 -- 4697 6116 Purge Method Syring Syring -- Syring Syring Tubing Length(ft.) 12 7 -- 11 11 Tubing Volume(ml) —70 —40 -- —61 -61 Volume Purged(ml) 140 80 -- 140 140 Sample Collection Time 916-922 1051-1059 -- 1127-1133 1206-1213 Can.Pressure Start(inHg) -26 -30 -- -30 -30 Can.Pressure end(inHg) -4 -1.5 -- -3 -5 Canister Fill Time (min./sec.) 6 min 8 min -- 6 min 7 min PID Reading(ppm) 0.0 -- -- 0.1 0.0 LEL 2% H2S LEL-- H2S-LEL H2S LEL 3% H2S LEL 1% H2S Oppm - Could not access Oppm Oppm Pump alarm on PID location due to and 4 gas,soils to heavy snow. tight for meter readings. Additional Notes Purge 2 volumes(min.)to 5 volumes � WENCK Soil Vapor Sampling (recommended) Form Responsive partner.Exceptional outcomes. Tubing Diam. (ID) Volume(ml)/foot Project Name: Eisinger Meadows Investigation .06(1/16) inch 0.56 Project Number: B5503-0003 .12 (1/8)inch 2.22 Project Location 3245 Wayzata Boulevard W. Orono, MN .19(3/16)inch 5.58 Field Technician: Cory Anderson and Joel Barthel .25(1/4) inch 9.65 Contractor: Range Environmental .31 (3/8) inch 14.84 Sample ID SV-6 SV-7 SV-8 SV-9 SV-10 Date 2/27/2019 2/27/2019 2/27/2019 2/27/2019 2/27/2019 Location See Map See Map See Map See Map See Map Sample Depth 5-10 5-10 10-12 5-12 10-12 Sampling Method, i.e. Geoprobe PRT Geoprobe PRT Geoprobe PRT Geoprobe PRT Geoprobe PRT Geoprobe PRT _ Bentonite Surface Seal? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Summa Canister Size 1L 1L 1L 1L 1L Summa Canister Number 3576 3817 5845 5493 5916 Flow Restrictor? Number? 6405 5315 5600 5883 6079 Purge Method Syring Syring Syring Syring Syring Tubing Length (ft.) 11 11 13 13 13 Tubing Volume(ml) -61 -61 -72 -72 -72 Volume Purged(ml) 140 140 150 150 150 Sample Collection Time 1233-1240 1241-1247 1323-1330 1359-1404 1422-1427 Can. Pressure Start(inHg) -29 -30 -28 -29 -26 Can. Pressure end(inHg) -2 -1 -3 -3 -2.5 Canister Fill Time 7 min 6 min 7 min 5 min 5 min (min./sec.) PID Reading (ppm) 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 'LEL 0% H2S LEL 2% H2S LEL 8% LEL%Over Range LEL 5% H2S Oppm Oppm H2S Oppm H2S Oppm Oppm Additional Notes Purge 2 volumes(min.)to 5 volumes � WENCK Soil Vapor Sampling (recommended) Form Responsive partner. Exceptional outcomes. Tubing Diam. (ID) Volume(ml)/foot Project Name: Eisinger Meadows Investigation .06(1/16) inch 0.56 Project Number: B5503-0003 .12(1/8)inch 2.22 Project Location 3245 Wayzata Boulevard W. Orono, MN .19(3/16)inch 5.58 Field Technician: Cory Anderson and Joel Barthel .25(1/4) inch 9.65 Contractor: Range Environmental .31 (3/8) inch 14.84 Sample ID SV-11 SV-12 SV-13 SV-14 SV-15 Date 2/27/2019 2/27/2019 2/27/2019 2/27/2019 See Notes Location See Map See Map See Map See Map See Map Sample Depth 8-10 8-10 5-12 5-10 -- Sampling Method, i.e. Geoprobe PRT Geoprobe PRT Geoprobe PRT Geoprobe PRT -- Geoprobe PRT Bentonite Surface Seal? Yes Yes Yes Yes -- Summa Canister Size 1L 1L 1L 1L -- Summa Canister Number 4860 6360 5873 6389 -- Flow Restrictor? Number? 4719 6526 6316 6506 -- Purge Method Syring Syring Syring Syring -- Tubing Length(ft.) 11 11 13 11 -- Tubing Volume(ml) -61 -61 -72 -61 -- Volume Purged(ml) 140 140 150 140 -- Sample Collection Time 1448-1454 1509-1516 1538-1544 1604-1610 -- Can. Pressure Start(inHg) -27 -29 -28 -30 -- Can. Pressure end(inHg) -3 -4 -4 -4.5 -- Canister Fill Time (min./sec.) 6 min 7 min 6 min 6 min -- PID Reading (ppm) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 -- LEL 28% LEL 66% LEL 3% LEL 2% H2S LEL H2S H2S Oppm H2S Oppm H2S Oppm Oppm Not enough time to complete on 2/27/19 Additional Notes Purge 2 volumes(min.)to 5 volumes o WENCK Soil Vapor Sampling (recommended) Form Responsive partner. Exceptional outcomes. Tubing Diam. (ID) Volume(ml)/foot Project Name: Eisinger Meadows Investigation .06(1/16) inch 0.56 Project Number: B5503-0003 .12(1/8) inch 2.22 Project Location 3245 Wayzata Boulevard W. Orono, MN .19(3/16)inch 5.58 Field Technician: Cory Anderson .25(1/4) inch 9.65 Contractor: Range Environmental .31 (3/8) inch 14.84 Sample ID SV-3 SV-15 Date 3/1/2019 3/1/2019 Location See Map See Map Sample Depth 5-10 5-10 Sampling Method, i.e. Geoprobe PRT Geoprobe PRT Geoprobe PRT Bentonite Surface Seal? Yes Yes Summa Canister Size 1L 1L Summa Canister Number 5935 4658 Flow Restrictor? Number? 4592 6036 Purge Method Syring Syring Tubing Length (ft.) 7 7 Tubing Volume(ml) —68 —68 Volume Purged (ml) 140 140 Sample Collection Time 849-856 922-928 Can. Pressure Start(inHg) -27 -29 Can. Pressure end(inHg) -3.5 -4 Canister Fill Time (min./sec.) 7 min 6 min PID Reading(ppm) -- 0.1 LEL-- H2S-LEL 3% H2S Oppm Pump alarm on PID and 4 gas, soils to tight for meter readings. Additional Notes Appendix B Laboratory Reports and Chain-of-Custody Documentation '� 1 Y t 0 ?T i i# "yv .-V-,.. -c----_,,:".., d U aF ' TestAmerica ..... ._,..!•_, ._,.,,,... _;.. 1 , ! 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111.1111111111111111111111111111111111 THE LEADER IN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING r �f . , , ANALYTICAL REPORT . TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. TestAmerica Cedar Falls .. ': 704 Enterprise Drive Cedar Falls, IA 50613 Tel: (319)277-2401 TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 TestAmerica Sample Delivery Group: B5503-0003 _FPI"— Client Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows - Orono, MN Revision: 1 ilh'' For: Wenck Associates, Inc �,. 1802 Wooddale Drive ` Suite 100 # Woodbury, Minnesota 55125 Attn: Michelle Hosfield arnialibsilligAii?t `* g Authorized for release by: W. �4, : 3/20/2019 10:17:29 AM s ,t4 ,- " Angela Muehlin Project Manager II � " g � angels.muehling@testamericainc.com x . N f Designee for 'f,:',4t.J.:,,,,N„Z;!%-tr,1,,,U41.'"-::4'.--''3'-1.-gi:i,-;..'.'-3?PA Zach Bindert, Project Manager I (319)227-2401 . r : �, zach.bindert@testamericainc.com a 11. ir f-_i � .y \-- ;':7::`;;;;:--; results through- " > TotcAccess ' t Have a Question? - ft �`1s k— _ :3 (✓ The �� This report has been electronically signed and authorized by the signatory. Electronic signature is 1.:.- N intended to be the legally binding equivalent of a traditionally handwritten signature. 4 ': E'�____ rt V ��� Results relate only to the items tested and the sample(s)as received by the laboratory. '-k' t ' Visit us at: www.testamerira i nc.com Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 El • Table of Contents Cover Page 1 Table of Contents 2 Case Narrative 3 Sample Summary 6 Detection Summary 7 Client Sample Results 11 Definitions 42 Surrogate Summary 43 QC Sample Results 47 QC Association 66 Chronicle 72 Certification Summary 78 Method Summary 79 Chain of Custody 80 Receipt Checklists 86 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 2 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) Case Narrative Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Job ID: 310-149954-1 Laboratory: TestAmerica Cedar Falls Narrative Job Narrative 310-149954-1 Comments This is a revised report due to a Total PCB data entry error on the following sample: B-5 (20-22.5')(310-149954-5). No additional comments. Receipt The samples were received on 2/23/2019 9:30 AM;the samples arrived in good condition, properly preserved and,where required, on ice. The temperatures of the 3 coolers at receipt time were 0.6°C, 1.3°C and 1.4°C. GC/MS VOA Method(s)8260B:The following sample(s)were collected in properly preserved vials for analysis of volatile organic compounds(VOCs). However,the pH was outside the required criteria when verified by the laboratory, and corrective action was not possible: B-2 (310-149954-8), B-3(310-149954-9)and B-4(310-149954-10). Method(s)8260B:The laboratory control sample(LCS)for analytical batch 310-230851 recovered outside control limits for the following analyte: 1,2-Dichloroethane. The analyte was biased high in the LCS and was not detected in the associated samples;therefore,the data have been reported. Method(s)8260B:The continuing calibration verification(CCV)associated with batch 310-231052 recovered above the upper control limit for trans-1,3-Dichloropropene(25.9%D). The samples associated with this CCV were non-detects for the affected analytes;therefore,the data have been reported. The following sample is impacted: (CCV 310-231052/3). No additional analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described above or in the Definitions/Glossary page. GC/MS Semi VOA Method(s)8270D SIM:The following samples were diluted due to the nature of the sample matrix: B-2(310-149954-8), B-3 (310-149954-9), B-4(310-149954-10)and B-5(310-149954-11). Elevated reporting limits(RLs)are provided. Method(s)8270D SIM: Surrogate recovery for the following sample was outside control limits: B-2(310-149954-8). Evidence of matrix interference is present;therefore, re-extraction and/or re-analysis was not performed. Method(s)8270D SIM:The RPD of the laboratory control sample(LCS)and laboratory control sample duplicate(LCSD)for batch preparation batch 310-230933 and analytical batch 310-230963 recovered outside control limits for the following analytes: Dibenz(a,h)anthracene. Method(s)8270D SIM:The following samples were diluted due to the nature of the sample matrix: B-2(15-20')(310-149954-2), B-3 (12.5-15')(310-149954-3), B-4(12.5-15')(310-149954-4)and B-5(20-22.5')(310-149954-5). Elevated reporting limits(RLs)are provided. Method(s)8270D SIM: Surrogate recovery for the following sample was outside control limits: B-5(20-22.5')(310-149954-5). Evidence of matrix interference is present; therefore, re-extraction and/or re-analysis was not performed. No additional analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described above or in the Definitions/Glossary page. GC VOA Method(s)WI-GRO:The following samples were collected in properly preserved vials for analysis of volatile organic compounds(VOCs). However,the pH was outside the required criteria when verified by the laboratory, and corrective action was not possible: B-2 (310-149954-8)and B-3(310-149954-9). No additional analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described above or in the Definitions/Glossary page. GC Semi VOA Method(s)8082A:The continuing calibration verification (CCV)associated with batch 310-231234 recovered above the upper control limit TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 3 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) Case Narrative Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Job ID: 310-149954-1 (Continued) El Laboratory: TestAmerica Cedar Falls (Continued) for PCB-1254. The samples associated with this CCV were non-detects for the affected analytes;therefore,the data have been reported. The following sample is impacted: (CCV 310-231234/13). Method(s)8082A:The continuing calibration verification(CCV)associated with batch 310-231234 recovered above the upper control limit for PCB-1254.The samples associated with this CCV which were non-detects for the affected analytes; have been reported. Method(s)8082A:The surrogate recovery for the blank associated with preparation batch 310-231032 and analytical batch 310-231234 was outside the upper control limits. Method(s)8082A:The continuing calibration verification(CCV)associated with batch 310-231425 recovered above the upper control limit for PCB-1221. The samples associated with this CCV were non-detects for the affected analytes;therefore,the data have been reported. Method(s)8082A:Surrogate recovery for the following sample was outside control limits: B-5(20-22.5')(310-149954-5), B-2(15-20') (310-149954-2)and B-3(12.5-15')(310-149954-3. Evidence of matrix interference is present;therefore, re-extraction and/or re-analysis was not performed. Method(s)8082A:The following samples were diluted due to the nature of the sample matrix: B-2(15-20')(310-149954-2), B-3(12.5-15') (310-149954-3), B-4(12.5-15')(310-149954-4)and B-5(20-22.5')(310-149954-5). Elevated reporting limits(RLs)are provided. Method(s)8082A:The continuing calibration verification(CCV)associated with batch 310-231329 recovered above the upper control limit for PCB-1016. The samples associated with this CCV were non-detects for the affected analytes;therefore,the data have been reported. Method(s)WI-DRO:Significant peaks, readily distinguished from background,were detected in the following samples within five minutes after the end of the analytical window defined by the last component eluting in the Diesel Range Organics(DRO)mix(i.e., n-Octacosane): 1-2(15-20')(310-149954-2), B-3(12.5-15')(310-149954-3), B-4(12.5-15')(310-149954-4)and B-5(20-22.5')(310-149954-5). Method(s)WI-DRO: Significant peaks, readily distinguished from background,were detected in the following samples within five minutes after the end of the analytical window defined by the last component eluting in the Diesel Range Organics(DRO)mix(i.e., n-Octacosane): B-4(310-149954-10)and B-5(310-149954-11). Method(s)WI-DRO:The laboratory control sample(LCS)for preparation batch 310-230972 and analytical batch 310-231284 recovered outside acceptance limits for DRO. There was insufficient sample to perform a re-extraction or re-analysis; therefore,the data have been reported. No additional analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described above or in the Definitions/Glossary page. Metals Method(s)3010A:The reference method requires samples to be preserved to a pH of<2. The following samples were received with insufficient preservation at a pH of>2: B-3(310-149954-9), B-4(310-149954-10)and(310-149954-A-10 DU). The sample(s)was preserved to the appropriate pH in the laboratory. Method(s)6010D:The following samples were diluted due to the presence of an interferent. B-1 (5-10')(310-149954-1), B-2(15-20') (310-149954-2), B-3(12.5-15')(310-149954-3), B-4(12.5-15')(310-149954-4)and B-5(20-22.5')(310-149954-5). Elevated reporting limits(RLs)are provided. Method(s)7470A:The reference method requires samples to be preserved to a pH of<2. The following samples were received with insufficient preservation at a pH of>2: B-3(310-149954-9)and B-4(310-149954-10). The sample(s)was preserved to the appropriate pH in the laboratory. No additional analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described above or in the Definitions/Glossary page. General Chemistry No analytical or quality issues were noted,other than those described in the Definitions/Glossary page. rganic Prep TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 4 of 86 3/20/2019(Rev. 1) Case Narrative Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Job ID: 310-149954-1 (Continued) Laboratory: TestAmerica Cedar Falls (Continued) Method(s)WI DRO PREP: The following sample was provided to the laboratory with a significantly different initial weight than that required by the reference method: B-5(20-22.5')(310-149954-5). The method requires 25-70.5 g. The amount provided was below this range. No additional analytical or quality issues were noted,other than those described above or in the Definitions/Glossary page. VOA Prep No analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described in the Definitions/Glossary page. TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 5 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) Sample Summary , , Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Matrix Collected Received 310-149954-1 B-1 (5-10') Soil 02/21/19 11:30 02/23/19 09:30 4 310-149954-2 B-2(15-20') Soil 02/21/19 12:20 02/23/19 09:30 310-149954-3 B-3(12.5-15') Soil 02/21/19 13:30 02/23/19 09:30 g `ry 310-149954-4 B-4(12.5-15') Soil 02/21/19 15:00 02/23/19 09:30 6::',, 310-149954-5 B-5(20-22.5') Soil 02/21/19 16:20 02/23/19 09:30 310-149954-6 Trip Blank Soil 02/21/19 08:00 02/23/19 09:30 310-149954-7 Trip Blank Water 02/21/19 08:00 02/23/19 09:30 310-149954-8 B-2 Ground Water 02/21/19 12:40 02/23/19 09:30 310-149954-9 B-3 Ground Water 02/21/19 13:55 02/23/19 09:30 310-149954-10 B-4 Ground Water 02/21/19 15:30 02/23/19 09:30 310-149954-11 B-5 Ground Water 02/21/19 16:45 02/23/19 09:30 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 6 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) Detection Summary Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-1 (5-10') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-1 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type Barium 123 1.77 mg/Kg 2 * 6010D Total/NA Chromium 15.7 1.77 mg/Kg 2 * 6010D Total/NA 0 Mercury 0.0323 0.0221 mg/Kg 1 * 7471B Total/NA Client Sample ID: B-2 (15-20') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-2 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type Ethylbenzene 0.745 0.137 mg/Kg 1 * 8260B Total/NA Naphthalene 0.610 0.343 mg/Kg 1 * 8260B Total/NA N-Propylbenzene 0.253 0.137 mg/Kg 1 < 8260B Total/NA Toluene 1.28 Fl 0.137 mg/Kg 1 * 8260B Total/NA 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 2.19 Fl 0.137 mg/Kg 1 * 8260B Total/NA 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.567 0.137 mg/Kg 1 * 8260B Total/NA Xylenes,Total 4.53 Fl 0.206 mg/Kg 1 * 8260B Total/NA Anthracene 0.215 0.116 mg/Kg 10 * 8270D SIM Total/NA Benzo[a]anthracene 0.884 0.116 mg/Kg 10 * 8270D SIM Total/NA Benzo[a]pyrene 0.893 0.116 mg/Kg 10 * 8270D SIM Total/NA Benzo[b]fluoranthene 1.23 0.116 mg/Kg 10 * 8270D SIM Total/NA Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 0.655 0.116 mg/Kg 10 * 8270D SIM Total/NA Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.410 0.116 mg/Kg 10 a 8270D SIM Total/NA Chrysene 0.877 0.116 mg/Kg 10 * 8270D SIM Total/NA Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 0.157 0.116 mg/Kg 10 * 8270D SIM Total/NA Fluoranthene 1.91 0.116 mg/Kg 10 ° 8270D SIM Total/NA Fluorene 0.116 0.116 mg/Kg 10 * 8270D SIM Total/NA Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 0.620 0.116 mg/Kg 10 * 8270D SIM Total/NA Phenanthrene 0.700 0.116 mg/Kg 10 + 8270D SIM Total/NA Pyrene 1.85 0.116 mg/Kg 10 * 8270D SIM Total/NA Diesel Range Organics(DRO) 185 7.32 mg/Kg 1 * WI-DRO Silica Gel Cleanup Barium 104 1.83 mg/Kg 2 * 6010D Total/NA Chromium 40.9 1.83 mg/Kg 2 * 6010D Total/NA Lead 56.0 9.14 mg/Kg 2 * 6010D Total/NA Mercury 0.0645 0.0225 mg/Kg 1 # 7471B Total/NA Client Sample ID: B-3 (12.5-15') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-3 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 5.94 0.169 mg/Kg 1 * 8260B Total/NA Benzo[a]anthracene 0.244 0.137 mg/Kg 10 * 8270D SIM Total/NA Benzo[a]pyrene 0.234 0.137 mg/Kg 10 * 8270D SIM Total/NA Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.338 0.137 mg/Kg 10 * 8270D SIM Total/NA Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 0.184 0.137 mg/Kg 10 * 8270D SIM Total/NA Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.137 0.137 mg/Kg 10 * 8270D SIM Total/NA Chrysene 0.261 0.137 mg/Kg 10 * 8270D SIM Total/NA Fluoranthene 0.420 0.137 mg/Kg 10 * 8270D SIM Total/NA Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 0.168 0.137 mg/Kg 10 * 8270D SIM Total/NA Phenanthrene 0.195 0.137 mg/Kg 10 * 8270D SIM Total/NA Pyrene 0.374 0.137 mg/Kg 10 * 8270D SIM Total/NA PCB-1254 0.678 0.332 mg/Kg 5 * 8082A Total/NA Diesel Range Organics(DRO) 1790 87.3 mg/Kg 10 * WI-DRO Silica Gel Cleanup This Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results. TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 7 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) Detection Summary Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-3 (12.5-15') (Continued) Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-3 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type Barium 118 2.99 mg/Kg 3 6010D Total/NA Chromium 18.9 2.99 mg/Kg 3 6010D Total/NA Lead 224 15.0 mg/Kg 3 * 6010D Total/NA 121 Mercury 0.152 0.0226 mg/Kg 1 * 7471B Total/NA Client Sample ID: B-4 (12.5-15') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-4 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type K.Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.187 0.143 mg/Kg 10 * 8270D SIM Total/NA a Fluoranthene 0.338 0.143 mg/Kg 10 * 8270D SIM Total/NA Phenanthrene 0.280 0.143 mg/Kg 10 * 8270D SIM Total/NA Pyrene 0.262 0.143 mg/Kg 10 * 8270D SIM Total/NA PCB-1254 0.246 0.0707 mg/Kg 1 * 8082A Total/NA Diesel Range Organics(DRO) 20.4 9.24 mg/Kg 1 * WI-DRO Silica Gel Cleanup Barium 222 2.42 mg/Kg 2 * 6010D Total/NA Chromium 23.7 2.42 mg/Kg 2 * 6010D Total/NA Lead 190 12.1 mg/Kg 2 * 6010D Total/NA Mercury 0.125 0.0269 mg/Kg 1 * 7471B Total/NAa ) 1'Al za Client Sample ID: B-5 (20-22.5') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-5 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type n-Butylbenzene 0.890 0.374 mg/Kg 1 * 8260B Total/NA sec-Butylbenzene 0.445 0.374 mg/Kg 1 2 8260B Total/NA 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.623 0.374 mg/Kg 1 * 8260B Total/NA 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.886 0.374 mg/Kg 1 82608 Total/NA Ethylbenzene 0.892 0.374 mg/Kg 1 # 8260B Total/NA p-Isopropyltoluene 0.488 0.374 mg/Kg 1 * 8260B Total/NA Naphthalene 2.74 0.935 mg/Kg 1 * 8260B Total/NA N-Propylbenzene 0.696 0.374 mg/Kg 1 * 8260B Total/NA 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 5.29 0.374 mg/Kg 1 * 8260B Total/NA 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 1.87 0.374 mg/Kg 1 0- 8260B Total/NA Xylenes,Total 3.60 0.561 mg/Kg 1 * 82608 Total/NA 2-Methylnaphthalene 0.895 0.219 mg/Kg 10 8270D SIM Total/NA Naphthalene 1.56 0.219 mg/Kg 10 * 8270D SIM Total/NA Phenanthrene 0.321 0.219 mg/Kg 10 * 8270D SIM Total/NA Wisconsin GRO 42.2 25.1 mg/Kg 1 * WI-GRO Total/NA PCB-1254 0.261 0.105 mg/Kg 1 0- 8082A Total/NA Diesel Range Organics(DRO) 577 32.5 mg/Kg 2 * WI-DRO Silica Gel Cleanup Barium 141 3.94 mg/Kg 2 # 6010D Total/NA Chromium 42.4 3.94 mg/Kg 2 * 6010D Total/NA Lead 184 19.7 mg/Kg 2 * 6010D Total/NA Mercury 2.96 0.402 mg/Kg 10 * 7471B Total/NA Client Sample ID: Trip Blank Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-6 No Detections. his Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results. TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 8 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) Detection Summary Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: Trip Blank Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-7 No Detections. Client Sample ID: B-2 Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-8 Ell Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type Diethyl ether 16.2 2.00 ug/L 1 8260B Total/NA Arsenic 0.00898 0.00200 mg/L 1 6020B Dissolved Barium 0.893 0.00200 mg/L 1 6020B Dissolved Client Sample ID: B-3 Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-9 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type Acetone 11.9 10.0 ug/L 1 8260B Total/NA Benzene 3.24 0.500 ug/L 1 8260B Total/NA n-Butylbenzene 1.09 1.00 ug/L 1 8260B Total/NA Chlorobenzene 3.04 1.00 ug/L 1 8260B Total/NA 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 4.06 1.00 ug/L 1 8260B Total/NA 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 2.18 1.00 ug/L 1 8260B Total/NA 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 6.54 1.00 ug/L 1 8260B Total/NA Ethylbenzene 3.98 1.00 ug/L 1 8260B Total/NA l Isopropylbenzene 1.51 1.00 ug/L 1 8260B Total/NA i p-lsopropyltoluene 5.33 1.00 ug/L 1 8260B Total/NA Naphthalene 6.29 5.00 ug/L 1 8260B Total/NA N-Propylbenzene 2.16 1.00 ug/L 1 8260B Total/NA Toluene 2.08 1.00 ug/L 1 8260B Total/NA 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 17.1 1.00 ug/L 1 8260B Total/NA 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 5.73 1.00 ug/L 1 8260B Total/NA Xylenes,Total 20.1 3.00 ug/L 1 8260B Total/NA Acenaphthene 2.94 1.06 ug/L 10 8270D SIM Total/NA Anthracene 1.69 1.06 ug/L 10 8270D SIM Total/NA Benzo[a]anthracene 2.67 1.06 ug/L 10 8270D SIM Total/NA Benzo[a]pyrene 2.08 1.06 ug/L 10 8270D SIM Total/NA Benzo[b]fluoranthene 2.91 1.06 ug/L 10 8270D SIM Total/NA Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 1.25 1.06 ug/L 10 8270D SIM Total/NA Benzo[k]fluoranthene 1.27 1.06 ug/L 10 8270D SIM Total/NA Chrysene 3.94 1.06 ug/L 10 8270D SIM Total/NA Fluoranthene 7.79 1.06 ug/L 10 8270D SIM Total/NA Fluorene 2.34 1.06 ug/L 10 8270D SIM Total/NA Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 1.35 1.06 ug/L 10 8270D SIM Total/NA Naphthalene 5.64 5.32 ug/L 10 8270D SIM Total/NA Phenanthrene 6.18 1.06 ug/L 10 8270D SIM Total/NA Pyrene 5.85 1.06 ug/L 10 8270D SIM Total/NA Diesel Range Organics(DRO) 0.581 * 0.106 mg/L 1 WI-DRO Silica Gel Cleanup Barium 0.784 0.00200 mg/L 1 6020B Dissolved Client Sample ID: B-4 Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-10 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type Diesel Range Organics(DRO) 0.204 * 0.108 mg/L 1 WI-DRO Silica Gel Cleanup Arsenic 0.00253 0.00200 mg/L 1 6020B Dissolved This Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results. TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 9 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) Detection Summary Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-4 (Continued) Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-10 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type Barium 0.207 0.00200 mg/L 1 6020B Dissolved z Client Sample ID: B-5 Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-11 113 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type , Diesel Range Organics(DRO) 0.175 * 0.105 mg/L 1 WI-DRO Silica Gel Cleanup ;' Barium 0.484 0.00200 mg/L 1 6020B Dissolved Lead 0.000580 0.000500 mg/L 1 6020B Dissolved j his Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results. TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 10 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-1 (5-10') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-1 Date Collected: 02/21/19 11:30 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 02/23/19 09:30 Percent Solids: 84.9 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Acetone <0.693 0.693 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Allyl chloride <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 6 Benzene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Bromobenzene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Bromochloromethane <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Bromodichloromethane <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Bromoform <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Bromomethane <0.693 0.693 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 2-Butanone(MEK) <0.346 0.346 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 n-Butylbenzene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 sec-Butylbenzene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 tert-Butylbenzene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Carbon tetrachloride <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Chlorobenzene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Chlorodibromomethane <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Dichlorofluoromethane <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Chloroethane <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Chloroform <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Chloromethane <0.346 0.346 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 4-Chlorotoluene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 2-Chlorotoluene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0- 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Dibromomethane <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 1,2-Dichloroethane <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 1,1-Dichloroethane <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 1,1-Dichloroethene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 1,2-Dichloropropane <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 1,3-Dichloropropane <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 2,2-Dichloropropane <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 1,1-Dichloropropene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg # 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Diethyl ether <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Ethylbenzene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Hexachlorobutadiene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Isopropylbenzene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 p-Isopropyltoluene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Methylene Chloride <0.346 0.346 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Methyl tert-butyl ether <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Naphthalene <0.346 0.346 mg/Kg 0- 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 N-Propylbenzene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 11 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-1 (5-10') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-1 Date Collected: 02/21/19 11:30 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 02/23/19 09:30 Percent Solids: 84.9 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac t ,, Styrene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg a 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 6 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Tetrachloroethene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg a 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Tetrahydrofuran <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Toluene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 ,,` 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 `': 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Trichloroethene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Trichlorofluoromethane <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg a 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Vinyl chloride <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 I, Xylenes,Total <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 98 80-120 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Dibromofluoromethane(Sun-) 93 80-120 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 LToluene-d8(Surr) 98 80-120 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Method: 8270D SIM -Semivolatile Organic Compound (GC/MS SIM LL) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Acenaphthene <0.0113 0.0113 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:26 1 Acenaphthylene <0.0113 0.0113 mg/Kg a 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:26 1 Anthracene <0.0113 0.0113 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:26 1 Benzo[a]anthracene <0.0113 0.0113 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:26 1 Benzo[a]pyrene <0.0113 0.0113 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:26 1 Benzo[b]fluoranthene <0.0113 0.0113 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:26 1 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene <0.0113 0.0113 mg/Kg 4 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:26 1 Benzo[k]fluoranthene <0.0113 0.0113 mg/Kg -u 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:26 1 Chrysene <0.0113 0.0113 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:26 1 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene <0.0113 0.0113 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:26 1 Fluoranthene <0.0113 0.0113 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:26 1 Fluorene <0.0113 0.0113 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:26 1 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene <0.0113 0.0113 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:26 1 2-Methylnaphthalene <0.0113 0.0113 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:26 1 Naphthalene <0.0113 0.0113 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:26 1 Phenanthrene <0.0113 0.0113 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:26 1 Pyrene <0.0113 0.0113 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:26 1 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 2-Fluorobiphenyl(Surr) 63 28_110 02/26/19 14.'11 02/27/19 15:26 1 Nitrobenzene-d5(Surr) 71 22-110 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:26 1 Terphenyl-d14(Surr) 63 26-110 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:26 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 12 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-1 (5-10') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-1 Date Collected: 02/21/19 11:30 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 02/23/19 09:30 Percent Solids: 84.9 Method:WI-GRO-Wisconsin -Gasoline Range Organics (GC) .; Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 1,15 Wisconsin GRO <12.1 12.1 mg/Kg * 02/25/19 10:08 02/25/19 14:45 1 c ` Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 6 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 95 80-120 02/25/19 10:08 02/25/19 14:45 1 Method: 8082A - Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) by Gas Chromatography Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac PCB-1016 <0.0585 0.0585 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 16:08 1 PCB-1221 <0.0585 0.0585 mg/Kg fF 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 16:08 1 PCB-1232 <0.0585 0.0585 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 16:08 1 PCB-1242 <0.0585 0.0585 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 16:08 1 PCB-1248 <0.0585 0.0585 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 16:08 1 PCB-1254 <0.0585 0.0585 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 16:08 1 PCB-1260 <0.0585 0.0585 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 16:08 1 PCB-1268 <0.0585 0.0585 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 16:08 1 Polychlorinated biphenyls,Total <0.0585 0.0585 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 16:08 1 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac DCB Decachlorobiphenyl(Surr) 63 10-110 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 16:08 1 Tetrachloro-m-xylene 63 10-110 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 16:08 1 Method: WI-DRO -Wisconsin - Diesel Range Organics (GC) -Silica Gel Cleanup Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Diesel Range Organics(DRO) <5.52 5.52 mg/Kg * 02/25/19 11:56 02/27/19 12:27 1 Method: 6010D - Metals (ICP) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Arsenic <7.10 7.10 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:35 2 Barium 123 1.77 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:35 2 Cadmium <1.77 1.77 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:35 2 Chromium 15.7 1.77 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:35 2 Lead <8.87 8.87 mg/Kg 0- 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:35 2 Selenium <13.3 13.3 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:35 2 Silver <1.77 1.77 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:35 2 Method: 7471B - Mercury (CVAA) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Mercury 0.0323 0.0221 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 10:00 02/27/19 12:35 1 General Chemistry Analyte Result Qualifier RL RL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Percent Moisture 15.1 0.1 % 02/25/19 11:27 1 Percent Solids 84.9 0.1 % 02/25/19 11:27 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 13 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-2 (15-20') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-2 Date Collected: 02/21/19 12:20 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 02/23/19 09:30 Percent Solids: 83.5 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) : ': Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac f ' Acetone <0.686 0.686 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Allyl chloride <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 6 Benzene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Bromobenzene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Bromochloromethane <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Bromodichloromethane <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg -0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Bromoform <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Bromomethane <0.686 0.686 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 2-Butanone(MEK) <0.343 0.343 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 n-Butylbenzene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 sec-Butylbenzene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 tert-Butylbenzene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Carbon tetrachloride <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Chlorobenzene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Chlorodibromomethane <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Dichlorofluoromethane <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 ,i "e Chloroethane <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg # 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 1;', ' , Chloroform <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Chloromethane <0.343 0.343 mg/Kg # 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 4-Chlorotoluene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 2-Chlorotoluene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Dibromomethane <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg # 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 1,2-Dichloroethane <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 1,1-Dichloroethane <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 1,1-Dichloroethene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg la 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 1,2-Dichloropropane <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 1,3-Dichloropropane <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 2,2-Dichloropropane <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 1,1-Dichloropropene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg # 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Diethyl ether <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Ethylbenzene 0.745 0.137 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Hexachlorobutadiene <0.137 Fl 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 lsopropylbenzene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 p-lsopropyltoluene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Methylene Chloride <0.343 0.343 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Methyl tert-butyl ether <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Naphthalene 0.610 0.343 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 N-Propylbenzene 0.253 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 14 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-2 (15-20') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-2 Date Collected: 02/21/19 12:20 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 02/23/19 09:30 Percent Solids: 83.5 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) , .i Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac '.:',v Styrene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 6 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Tetrachloroethene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Tetrahydrofuran <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Toluene 1.28 F1 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg # 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Trichloroethene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Trichlorofluoromethane <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 2.19 Fl 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.567 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Vinyl chloride <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 0K. Xylenes,Total 4.53 F1 0.206 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 98 80-120 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) 96 80-120 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Toluene-d8(Surr) 98 80-120 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Method: 8270D SIM - Semivolatile Organic Compound (GC/MS SIM LL) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Acenaphthene <0.116 0.116 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:45 10 Acenaphthylene <0.116 0.116 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:45 10 Anthracene 0.215 0.116 mg/Kg 4 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:45 10 Benzo[a]anthracene 0.884 0.116 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:45 10 Benzo[a]pyrene 0.893 0.116 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:45 10 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 1.23 0.116 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:45 10 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 0.655 0.116 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:45 10 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.410 0.116 mg/Kg ff 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:45 10 Chrysene 0.877 0.116 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:45 10 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 0.157 0.116 mg/Kg # 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:45 10 Fluoranthene 1.91 0.116 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:45 10 Fluorene 0.116 0.116 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:45 10 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 0.620 0.116 mg/Kg '0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:45 10 2-Methylnaphthalene <0.116 0.116 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:45 10 Naphthalene <0 116 0.116 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:45 10 Phenanthrene 0.700 0.116 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:45 10 Pyrene 1.85 0.116 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:45 10 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Oil Fac 2-Fluorobiphenyl(Surr) 59 28-110 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:45 10 Nitrobenzene-d5(Surr) 104 22-110 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:45 10 Terphenyl-d14(Surr) 66 26-110 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:45 10 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 15 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 :Tient Sample ID: B-2 (15-20') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-2 Date Collected: 02/21/19 12:20 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 02/23/19 09:30 Percent Solids: 83.5 Method:WI-GRO -Wisconsin -Gasoline Range Organics (GC) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 1 } Wisconsin GRO <11.8 11.8 mg/Kg * 02/25/19 10:08 02/25/19 15:16 1 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 6 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 101 80-120 02/25/19 10:08 02/25/19 15:16 1 Method: 8082A - Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) by Gas Chromatography Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac PCB-1016 <2.94 * 2.94 mg/Kg * 02/26/1914:18 03/01/1915:11 50 PCB-1221 <2.94 2.94 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:18 03/01/19 15:11 50 PCB-1232 <2.94 2.94 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:18 03/01/19 15:11 50 PCB-1242 <2.94 2.94 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:18 03/01/19 15:11 50 PCB-1248 <2.94 2.94 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:18 03/01/19 15:11 50 PCB-1254 <0.0589 0.0589 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 16:19 1 PCB-1260 <0.0589 0.0589 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 16:19 1 PCB-1268 <0.0589 0.0589 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 16:19 1 Polychlorinated biphenyls,Total <2.94 2.94 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:18 03/01/19 15:11 50 . Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac , -, DCB Decachlorobiphenyl(Surr) 59 10-110 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 16:19 1 Tetrachloro-m-xylene 171 X 10-110 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 16:19 1 r- Method: WI-DRO -Wisconsin - Diesel Range Organics (GC) - Silica Gel Cleanup Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac LDiesel Range Organics(DRO) 185 7.32 mg/Kg * 02/25/19 11:56 02/27/19 12:40 1 Method: 6010D - Metals (ICP) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Arsenic <7.31 7.31 mg/Kg -0 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:37 2 Barium 104 1.83 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:37 2 Cadmium <1.83 1.83 mg/Kg # 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:37 2 Chromium 40.9 1.83 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:37 2 Lead 56.0 9.14 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:37 2 Selenium <13.7 13.7 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:37 2 Silver <1.83 1.83 mg/Kg o 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:37 2 Method: 7471B -Mercury (CVAA) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Mercury 0.0645 0.0225 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 08:52 02/27/19 12:38 1 ^General Chemistry Analyte Result Qualifier RL RL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Percent Moisture 16.5 0.1 % 02/25/19 11:27 1 Percent Solids 83.5 0.1 % 02/25/19 11:27 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 16 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-3 (12.5-15') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-3 Date Collected: 02/21/19 13:30 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 02/23/19 09:30 Percent Solids: 72.1 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Acetone <0.844 0.844 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 Allyl chloride <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 6 Benzene <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 Bromobenzene <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 Bromochloromethane <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 Bromodichloromethane <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 Bromoform <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 Bromomethane <0.844 0.844 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 2-Butanone(MEK) <0.422 0.422 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 n-Butylbenzene <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 sec-Butylbenzene <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 tert-Butylbenzene <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 Carbon tetrachloride <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 Chlorobenzene <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 Chlorodibromomethane <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 Dichlorofluoromethane <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 Chloroethane <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 Chloroform <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg la 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 Chloromethane <0.422 0.422 mg/Kg c> 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 4-Chlorotoluene <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 2-Chlorotoluene <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 Dibromomethane <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 5.94 0.169 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 1,2-Dichloroethane <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 1,1-Dichloroethane <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 1,1-Dichloroethene <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 1,2-Dichloropropane <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 1,3-Dichloropropane <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 2,2-Dichloropropane <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg a 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 1,1-Dichloropropene <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg o 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 Diethyl ether <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg r 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 Ethylbenzene <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 Hexachlorobutadiene <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 lsopropylbenzene <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 p-lsopropyltoluene <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 Methylene Chloride <0.422 0.422 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 Methyl tert-butyl ether <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 Naphthalene <0.422 0.422 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 N-Propylbenzene <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 17 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 3lient Sample ID: B-3 (12.5-15') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-3 Date Collected: 02/21/19 13:30 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 02/23/19 09:30 Percent Solids: 72.1 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) ir Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Styrene <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 6 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 Tetrachloroethene <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 Tetrahydrofuran <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 Toluene <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg # 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 =. 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 a' 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 Trichloroethene <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 Trichlorofluoromethane <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 Vinyl chloride <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 t Xylenes,Total <0.253 0.253 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 96 80-120 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) 92 80-120 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 LToluene-d8(Surr) 98 80-120 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 Method: 8270D SIM -Semivolatile Organic Compound (GC/MS SIM LL) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Acenaphthene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:21 10 Acenaphthylene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg a 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:21 10 Anthracene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:21 10 Benzo[a]anthracene 0.244 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:21 10 Benzo[a]pyrene 0.234 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:21 10 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.338 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:21 10 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 0.184 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:21 10 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.137 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:21 10 Chrysene 0.261 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:21 10 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:21 10 Fluoranthene 0.420 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:21 10 Fluorene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg # 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:21 10 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 0.168 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:21 10 2-Methylnaphthalene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:21 10 Naphthalene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:21 10 Phenanthrene 0.195 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:21 10 Pyrene 0.374 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/26/1914:11 02/27/1916:21 10 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 2-Fluorobiphenyl(Surr) 60 28-110 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:21 10 Nitrobenzene-d5(Surr) 75 22-110 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:21 10 Terphenyl-d14(Surr) 61 26-110 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:21 10 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 18 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-3 (12.5-15') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-3 Date Collected: 02/21/19 13:30 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 02/23/19 09:30 Percent Solids: 72.1 Method:WI-GRO -Wisconsin -Gasoline Range Organics (GC) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac V z Wisconsin GRO <13.0 13.0 mg/Kg * 02/25/19 10:08 02/25/19 15:47 1 c Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 6 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 97 80-120 02/25/19 10:08 02/25/19 15:47 1 Method: 8082A - Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) by Gas Chromatography Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac PCB-1016 <6.63 * 6.63 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:18 03/01/19 15:21 100 PCB-1221 <6.63 6.63 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:18 03/01/19 15:21 100 PCB-1232 <6.63 6.63 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:18 03/01/19 15:21 100 PCB-1242 <6.63 6.63 mg/Kg 02/26/19 14:18 03/01/19 15:21 100 PCB-1248 <6.63 6.63 mg/Kg # 02/26/19 14:18 03/01/19 15:21 100 PCB-1254 0.678 0.332 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:18 03/01/19 17:23 5 PCB-1260 <0.0663 0.0663 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 16:30 1 PCB-1268 <0.0663 0.0663 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 16:30 1 Polychlorinated biphenyls,Total <6.63 6.63 mg/Kg 3 02/26/19 14:18 03/01/19 15:21 100 (r Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac '" DCB Decachlorobiphenyl(Surr) 49 10-110 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 16:30 1 Tetrachloro-m-xylene 275 X 10-110 02/26/19 14.18 02/28/19 16:30 1 Method: WI-DRO -Wisconsin - Diesel Range Organics (GC) -Silica Gel Cleanup Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Diesel Range Organics(DRO) 1790 87.3 mg/Kg * 02/25/19 11:56 02/27/19 12:52 10 Method: 6010D - Metals (ICP) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Arsenic <12.0 12.0 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:39 3 Barium 118 2.99 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:39 3 Cadmium <2.99 2.99 mg/Kg 2 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:39 3 Chromium 18.9 2.99 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:39 3 Lead 224 15.0 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:39 3 Selenium <22.4 22.4 mg/Kg 2 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:39 3 Silver <2.99 2.99 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:39 3 Method: 7471B - Mercury (CVAA) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Mercury 0.152 0.0226 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 08:52 02/27/19 12:44 1 General Chemistry Analyte Result Qualifier RL RL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Percent Moisture 27.9 0.1 % 02/25/19 11:27 1 Percent Solids 72.1 0.1 % 02/25/19 11:27 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 19 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) @i 1 Client Sample Results a p nj Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-4 (12.5-15') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-4 Date Collected: 02/21/19 15:00 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 02/23/19 09:30 Percent Solids: 69.7 ,. . Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Acetone <0.950 0.950 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Allyl chloride <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 6 Benzene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg z 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Bromobenzene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 _: Bromochloromethane <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Bromodichloromethane <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Bromoform <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Bromomethane <0.950 0.950 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 2-Butanone(MEK) <0.475 0.475 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 n-Butylbenzene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 sec-Butylbenzene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 tert-Butylbenzene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Carbon tetrachloride <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Chlorobenzene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Chlorodibromomethane <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Dichlorofluoromethane <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 ,. ,r, Chloroethane <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg -0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 I A Chloroform <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Chloromethane <0.475 0.475 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 4-Chlorotoluene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 2-Chlorotoluene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg o 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Dibromomethane <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 1,2-Dichloroethane <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 1,1-Dichloroethane <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 1,1-Dichloroethene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 1,2-Dichloropropane <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 1,3-Dichloropropane <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 2,2-Dichloropropane <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 1,1-Dichloropropene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Diethyl ether <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg # 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Ethylbenzene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Hexachlorobutadiene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Isopropylbenzene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 p-lsopropyltoluene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Methylene Chloride <0.475 0.475 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Methyl tert-butyl ether <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Naphthalene <0.475 0.475 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 N-Propylbenzene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 20 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) Client Sample Results .. Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 "" Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-4 (12.5-15') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-4 Date Collected: 02/21/19 15:00 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 02/23/19 09:30 Percent Solids: 69.7 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) `t', Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Oil Fac o la Styrene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 6 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Tetrachloroethene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Tetrahydrofuran <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg # 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Toluene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg ' 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg 3> 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Trichloroethene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Trichlorofluoromethane <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg r 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Vinyl chloride <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Xylenes,Total <0.285 0.285 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 98 80-120 02/27/19 05.39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) 95 80-120 02/27/19 05.39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Toluene-d8(Surr) 99 80_120 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Method: 8270D SIM -Semivolatile Organic Compound (GC/MS SIM LL) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Acenaphthene <0.143 0.143 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:58 10 Acenaphthylene <0.143 0.143 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:58 10 Anthracene <0.143 0.143 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:58 10 Benzo[alanthracene <0.143 0.143 mg/Kg # 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:58 10 Benzo[a]pyrene <0.143 0.143 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:58 10 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.187 0.143 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:58 10 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene <0.143 0.143 mg/Kg a 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:58 10 Benzo[k]fluoranthene <0.143 0.143 mg/Kg a 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:58 10 Chrysene <0.143 0.143 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:58 10 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene <0.143 0.143 mg/Kg # 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:58 10 Fluoranthene 0.338 0.143 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:58 10 Fluorene <0.143 0.143 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:58 10 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene <0.143 0.143 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:58 10 2-Methylnaphthalene <0.143 0.143 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:58 10 Naphthalene <0.143 0.143 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:58 10 Phenanthrene 0.280 0.143 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:58 10 Pyrene 0.262 0.143 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:58 10 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 2-Fluorobiphenyl(Sun-) 67 28-110 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:58 10 Nitrobenzene-d5(Surr) 90 22-110 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:58 10 Terphenyl-d14(Surr) 63 26-110 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:58 10 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 21 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-4 (12.5-15') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-4 Date Collected: 02/21/19 15:00 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 02/23/19 09:30 Percent Solids: 69.7 Method: WI-GRO -Wisconsin -Gasoline Range Organics (GC) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 0 Wisconsin GRO <14.7 14.7 mg/Kg * 02/25/19 10:08 02/25/19 16:25 1 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Sun-) 87 80-120 02/25/19 10:08 02/25/19 16:25 1 Method: 8082A - Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) by Gas Chromatography Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac PCB-1016 <1.77 ' 1.77 mg/Kg * 02/26/1914:18 03/01/1915:43 25 PCB-1221 <1.77 1.77 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:18 03/01/19 15:43 25 PCB-1232 <1.77 1.77 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:18 03/01/19 15:43 25 PCB-1242 <1.77 1.77 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:18 03/01/19 15:43 25 PCB-1248 <1.77 1.77 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:18 03/01/19 15:43 25 PCB-1254 0.246 0.0707 mg/Kg # 02/26/19 14:18 03/01/19 15:54 1 PCB-1260 <0.0707 0.0707 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 16:41 1 PCB-1268 <0.0707 0.0707 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 16:41 1 Polychlorinated biphenyls,Total <1.77 1.77 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:18 03/01/19 15:43 25 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac ;,':- DCB , DCB Decachlorobiphenyl(Surr) 59 10-110 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 16:41 1 Tetrachloro-m-xylene 88 10-110 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 16:41 1 Method: WI-DRO -Wisconsin - Diesel Range Organics (GC) - Silica Gel Cleanup Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac LDiesel Range Organics(DRO) 20.4 9.24 mg/Kg * 02/25/19 11:56 02/27/19 13:05 1 Method: 6010D -Metals (ICP) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Arsenic <9.67 9.67 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:40 2 Barium 222 2.42 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:40 2 Cadmium <2.42 2.42 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:40 2 Chromium 23.7 2.42 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:40 2 Lead 190 12.1 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:40 2 Selenium <18.1 18.1 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:40 2 Silver <2.42 2.42 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:40 2 Method: 7471B - Mercury (CVAA) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Mercury 0.125 0.0269 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 08:52 02/27/19 12:46 1 General Chemistry Analyte Result Qualifier RL RL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Percent Moisture 30.3 0.1 % 02/25/19 11:27 1 Percent Solids 69.7 0.1 % 02/25/19 11:27 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 22 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-5 (20-22.5') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-5 Date Collected: 02/21/19 16:20 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 02/23/19 09:30 Percent Solids: 44.9 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac o, ,y Acetone <1.87 1.87 mg/Kg o 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Allyl chloride <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 6 Benzene <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Bromobenzene <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Bromochloromethane <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Bromodichloromethane <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Bromoform <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Bromomethane <1.87 1.87 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 2-Butanone(MEK) <0.935 0.935 mg/Kg -0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 n-Butylbenzene 0.890 _ 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 sec-Butylbenzene 0.445 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 tert-Butylbenzene <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Carbon tetrachloride <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Chlorobenzene <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Chlorodibromomethane <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Dichlorofluoromethane <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 41,,.. Chloroethane <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Chloroform <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Chloromethane <0.935 0.935 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 4-Chlorotoluene <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 2-Chlorotoluene <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0- 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Dibromomethane <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.623 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.886 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 1,2-Dichloroethane <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 1,1-Dichloroethane <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 1,1-Dichloroethene <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 1,2-Dichloropropane <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 1,3-Dichloropropane <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 2,2-Dichloropropane <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 1,1-Dichloropropene <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 4 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Diethyl ether <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Ethylbenzene 0.892 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Hexachlorobutadiene <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Isopropylbenzene <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 4 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 p-Isopropyltoluene 0.488 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Methylene Chloride <0.935 0.935 mg/Kg 0- 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Methyl tert-butyl ether <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Naphthalene 2.74 0.935 mg/Kg 0- 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 N-Propylbenzene 0.696 0.374 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 23 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 :tient Sample ID: B-5 (20-22.5') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-5 Date Collected: 02/21/19 16:20 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 02/23/19 09:30 Percent Solids: 44.9 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac t Styrene <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 6 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Tetrachloroethene <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Tetrahydrofuran <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Toluene <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg '0 02/27/1905:39 02/27/1911:59 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Trichloroethene <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Trichlorofluoromethane <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 5.29 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 1.87 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Vinyl chloride <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Xylenes,Total 3.60 0.561 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Sun) 101 80-120 02/27/19 05.39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) 93 80-120 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Toluene-d8(Surr) 98 80-120 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Method: 8270D SIM -Semivolatile Organic Compound (GC/MS SIM LL) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Acenaphthene <0.219 0.219 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 17:35 10 Acenaphthylene <0.219 0.219 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 17:35 10 Anthracene <0.219 0.219 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 17:35 10 Benzo[a]anthracene <0.219 0.219 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 17:35 10 Benzo[a]pyrene <0.219 0.219 mg/Kg '0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 17:35 10 Benzo[b]fluoranthene <0.219 0.219 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 17:35 10 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene <0.219 0.219 mg/Kg 0- 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 17:35 10 Benzo[k]fluoranthene <0.219 0.219 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 17:35 10 Chrysene <0.219 0.219 mg/Kg '0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 17:35 10 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene <0.219 0.219 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 17:35 10 Fluoranthene <0.219 0.219 mg/Kg # 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 17:35 10 Fluorene <0.219 0.219 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 17:35 10 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene <0.219 0.219 mg/Kg 4 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 17:35 10 2-Methylnaphthalene 0.895 0.219 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 17:35 10 Naphthalene 1.56 0.219 mg/Kg # 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 17:35 10 Phenanthrene 0.321 0.219 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 17:35 10 Pyrene <0.219 0.219 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 17:35 10 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 2-Fluorobiphenyl(Surr) 50 28-110 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 17:35 10 Nitrobenzene-d5(Surr) 119 X 22-110 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 17:35 10 Terphenyl-d14(Surr) 46 26-110 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 17:35 10 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 24 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) Client Sample Results au Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-5 (20-22.5') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-5 Date Collected: 02/21/19 16:20 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 02/23/19 09:30 Percent Solids: 44.9 Method: WI-GRO -Wisconsin -Gasoline Range Organics (GC) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D PreparedAnalyzed Dil Fac 'F Wisconsin GRO 42.2 25.1 mg/Kg -0 02/25/19 10:08 02/25/19 16:56 1 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 6 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 119 80-120 02/25/19 10:08 02/25/19 16:56 1 Method: 8082A - Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) by Gas Chromatography Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac PCB-1016 <10.5 * 10.5 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:18 03/01/19 16:05 100 PCB-1221 <10.5 10.5 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:18 03/01/19 16:05 100 PCB-1232 <10.5 10.5 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:18 03/01/19 16:05 100 PCB-1242 <10.5 10.5 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:18 03/01/19 16:05 100 PCB-1248 <10.5 10.5 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:18 03/01/19 16:05 100 PCB-1254 0.261 0.105 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:18 03/01/19 16:15 1 PCB-1260 <0.105 0.105 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 16:51 1 PCB-1268 <0.105 0.105 mg/Kg 0- 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 16:51 1 Polychlorinated biphenyls,Total <10.5 10.5 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:18 03/01/19 16:05 100 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac DCB Decachlorobiphenyl(Surr) 43 10-110 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 16:51 1 Tetrachloro-m-xylene 246 X 10-110 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 16:51 1 Method:WI-DRO-Wisconsin -Diesel Range Organics (GC) -Silica Gel Cleanup Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Diesel Range Organics(DRO) 577 32.5 mg/Kg 0 02/25/19 11:56 02/27/19 13:17 2 Method: 6010D -Metals (ICP) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Arsenic <15.8 15.8 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:42 2 Barium 141 3.94 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:42 2 Cadmium <3.94 3.94 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:42 2 Chromium 42.4 3.94 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:42 2 Lead 184 19.7 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:42 2 Selenium <29.5 29.5 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:42 2 Silver <3.94 3.94 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:42 2 Method: 7471B - Mercury (CVAA) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Mercury 2.96 0.402 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 08:52 02/27/19 14:19 10 General Chemistry Analyte Result Qualifier RL RL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Percent Moisture 55.1 0.1 % 02/25/19 11:27 1 Percent Solids 44.9 0.1 % 02/25/19 11:27 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 25 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: Trip Blank Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-6 Date Collected: 02/21/19 08:00 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 02/23/19 09:30 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Acetone <0.500 0.500 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Allyl chloride <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 6 Benzene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Bromobenzene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Bromochloromethane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Bromodichloromethane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Bromoform <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Bromomethane <0.500 0.500 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 2-Butanone(MEK) <0.250 0.250 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 n-Butylbenzene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 sec-Butylbenzene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 tert-Butylbenzene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Carbon tetrachloride <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Chlorobenzene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Chlorodibromomethane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Dichlorofluoromethane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Chloroethane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Chloroform <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Chloromethane <0.250 0.250 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 4-Chlorotoluene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 2-Chlorotoluene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Dibromomethane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 1,2-Dichloroethane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 1,1-Dichloroethane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 1,1-Dichloroethene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 1,2-Dichloropropane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 1,3-Dichloropropane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 2,2-Dichloropropane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 1,1-Dichloropropene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Diethyl ether <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Ethylbenzene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Hexachlorobutadiene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Isopropylbenzene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 p-Isopropyltoluene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Methylene Chloride <0.250 0.250 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Methyl tert-butyl ether <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Naphthalene <0.250 0.250 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 N-Propylbenzene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 26 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) Client Sample Results .,.A Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: Trip Blank Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-6 Date Collected: 02/21/19 08:00 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 02/23/19 09:30 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac ; Styrene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 6 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Tetrachloroethene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Tetrahydrofuran <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Toluene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Trichloroethene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Trichlorofluoromethane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Vinyl chloride <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 •°, Xylenes,Total <0.150 0.150 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 97 80-120 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) 92 80-120 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Toluene-d8(Surr) 99 80-120 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Method: WI-GRO -Wisconsin -Gasoline Range Organics (GC) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Wisconsin GRO <10.0 10.0 mg/Kg 02/25/19 10:08 02/25/19 13:43 1 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 80 80-120 02/25/19 10.08 02/25/19 13:43 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 27 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: Trip Blank Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-7 Date Collected: 02/21/19 08:00 Matrix: Water Date Received: 02/23/19 09:30 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) ,, Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D PreparedAnalyzed Dii Fac ot- Acetone <10.0 10.0 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 C Allyl chloride <2.00 2.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 6 Benzene <0.500 0.500 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 Bromobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 Bromochloromethane <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 Bromodichloromethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 Bromoform <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 Bromomethane <4.00 4.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 2-Butanone(MEK) <10.0 10.0 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 n-Butylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 sec-Butylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 tert-Butylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 Carbon tetrachloride <2.00 2.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 Chlorobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 Chlorodibromomethane <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 Dichlorofluoromethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 ,•., Chloroethane <4.00 4.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 '' ` '- Chloroform <3.00 3.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 Chloromethane <3.00 3.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 4-Chlorotoluene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 2-Chlorotoluene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane <3.00 3.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 1,2-Dichloroethane <1.00 * 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 1,1-Dichloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 1,1-Dichloroethene <2.00 2.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 1,2-Dichloropropane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 1,3-Dichloropropane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 2,2-Dichloropropane <4.00 4.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 1,1-Dichloropropene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/1922:58 1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 Diethyl ether <2.00 2.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 Ethylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 Hexachlorobutadiene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 lsopropylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 p-lsopropyltoluene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) <10.0 10.0 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 Methylene Chloride <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 Methyl tert-butyl ether <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 Naphthalene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 N-Propylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 Styrene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 28 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) Client Sample Results 3 Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: Trip Blank Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-7 Date Collected: 02/21/19 08:00 Matrix: Water Date Received: 02/23/19 09:30 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 6 Tetrachloroethene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 Tetrahydrofuran <10.0 10.0 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 Toluene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 Trichloroethene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 Trichlorofluoromethane <4.00 4.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane <2.00 2.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 Vinyl chloride <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 i Xylenes,Total <3.00 3.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 't Dibromomethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 93 80-120 02/25/19 22:58 1 Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) 105 80-120 02/25/19 22:58 1 Toluene-d8(Surr) 103 80-120 02/25/19 22:58 1 Method: WI-GRO -Wisconsin -Gasoline Range Organics (GC) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac /L 02/25/1916:51 1 <100 100 a Wisconsin GRO ug /L %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 93 80-120 02/25/19 16:51 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 29 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-2 Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-8 Date Collected: 02/21/19 12:40 Matrix: Ground Water Date Received: 02/23/19 09:30 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Acetone <10.0 10.0 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 c Allyl chloride <2.00 2.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 6 Benzene <0.500 0.500 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 Bromobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 Bromochloromethane <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 Bromodichloromethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 Bromoform <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 Bromomethane <4.00 4.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 2-Butanone(MEK) <10.0 10.0 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 n-Butylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 sec-Butylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 tert-Butylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 Carbon tetrachloride <2.00 2.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 Chlorobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 Chlorodibromomethane <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 Dichlorofluoromethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 z, Chloroethane <4.00 4.00 ug/L 02/25/1923:22 1 i, 4=` Chloroform <3.00 3.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 Chloromethane <3.00 3.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 4-Chlorotoluene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 2-Chlorotoluene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane <3.00 3.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 1,2-Dichloroethane <1.00 * 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 1,1-Dichloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 1,1-Dichloroethene <2.00 2.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/1923:22 1 1,2-Dichloropropane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 1,3-Dichloropropane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 2,2-Dichloropropane <4.00 4.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 1,1-Dichloropropene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 Diethyl ether 16.2 2.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 Ethylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 Hexachlorobutadiene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 Isopropylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 p-lsopropyltoluene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) <10.0 10.0 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 Methylene Chloride <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 Methyl tert-butyl ether <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 Naphthalene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 N-Propylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 Styrene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 30 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-2 Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-8 Date Collected: 02/21/19 12:40 Matrix: Ground Water Date Received: 02/23/19 09:30 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 `"" 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 6 Tetrachloroethene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 Tetrahydrofuran <10.0 10.0 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 Toluene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 Trichloroethene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 Trichlorofluoromethane <4.00 4.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane <2.00 2.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 Vinyl chloride <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 ,; Xylenes,Total <3.00 3.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 Dibromomethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 " Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 98 80-120 02/25/19 23:22 1 Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) 103 80-120 02/25/19 23:22 1 Toluene-d8(Surr) 105 80-120 02/25/19 23:22 1 Method: 8270D SIM -Semivolatile Organic Compound (GC/MS SIM LL) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Acenaphthene <1.12 1.12 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 19:46 10 Acenaphthylene <1.12 1.12 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 19:46 10 Anthracene <1.12 1.12 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 19:46 10 Benzo[a]anthracene <1.12 1.12 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 19:46 10 Benzo[a]pyrene <1.12 1.12 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 19:46 10 Benzo[b]fluoranthene <1.12 1.12 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 19:46 10 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene <1.12 1.12 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 19:46 10 Benzo[k]fluoranthene <1.12 1.12 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 19:46 10 Chrysene <1.12 1.12 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 19:46 10 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene <1.12 * 1.12 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 19:46 10 Fluoranthene <1.12 1.12 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 19:46 10 Fluorene <1.12 1.12 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 19:46 10 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene <1.12 1.12 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 19:46 10 2-Methylnaphthalene <1.12 1.12 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 19:46 10 Naphthalene <5.62 5.62 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 19:46 10 Phenanthrene <1.12 1.12 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 19:46 10 Pyrene <1.12 1.12 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 19:46 10 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 2-Fluorobiphenyl(Surr) 82 22-110 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 19:46 10 Nitrobenzene-d5(Surr) 88 17-116 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 19:46 10 Terphenyl-d14(Surr) 140 X 10-136 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 19:46 10 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 31 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Tient Sample ID: B-2 Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-8 Date Collected: 02/21/19 12:40 Matrix: Ground Water Date Received: 02/23/19 09:30 Method:WI-GRO-Wisconsin -Gasoline Range Organics (GC) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D PreparedAnalyzed Di!Fac Wisconsin GRO <100 100 ug/L 02/25/19 21:35 1 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Burr) 91 80-120 02/25/19 21:35 1 Method: WI-DRO -Wisconsin - Diesel Range Organics (GC) -Silica Gel Cleanup Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Diesel Range Organics(DRO) <0.120 * 0.120 mg/L 02/26/19 08:45 03/01/19 08:39 1 Method: 6020B -Metals (ICP/MS) -Dissolved Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Arsenic 0.00898 0.00200 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/01/19 19:40 1 Barium 0.893 0.00200 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/01/19 19:40 1 Cadmium <0.000500 0.000500 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/01/19 19:40 1 Chromium <0.00500 0.00500 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/01/19 19:40 1 Lead <0.000500 0.000500 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/01/19 19:40 1 Selenium <0.00500 0.00500 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/01/19 19:40 1 Silver <0.00100 0.00100 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/01/19 19:40 1 Method: 7470A -Mercury (CVAA) - Dissolved Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Mercury <0.000200 0.000200 mg/L 02/26/19 09:34 02/27/19 16:23 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 32 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-3 Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-9 Date Collected: 02/21/19 13:55 Matrix: Ground Water Date Received: 02/23/19 09:30 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) I, t Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Acetone 11.9 10.0 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 Allyl chloride <2.00 2.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 6 Benzene 3.24 0.500 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 Bromobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 Bromochloromethane <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 Bromodichloromethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 Bromoform <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 Bromomethane <4.00 4.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 2-Butanone(MEK) <10.0 10.0 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 n-Butylbenzene 1.09 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 sec-Butylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 tert-Butylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 Carbon tetrachloride <2.00 2.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 Chlorobenzene 3.04 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 Chlorodibromomethane <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 Dichlorofluoromethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 ,? .: Chloroethane <4.00 4.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 Chloroform <3.00 3.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 Chloromethane <3.00 3.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 4-Chlorotoluene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 2-Chlorotoluene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 4.06 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 2.18 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 6.54 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane <3.00 3.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 1,2-Dichloroethane <1.00 * 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 1,1-Dichloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 1,1-Dichloroethene <2.00 2.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 1,2-Dichloropropane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 1,3-Dichloropropane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 2,2-Dichloropropane <4.00 4.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 1,1-Dichloropropene <1.00 1.00 ug/L ` 02/25/19 23:46 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 Diethyl ether <2.00 2.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 Ethylbenzene 3.98 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 Hexachlorobutadiene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 Isopropylbenzene 1.51 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 p-Isopropyltoluene 5.33 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) <10.0 10.0 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 Methylene Chloride <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 Methyl tert-butyl ether <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 Naphthalene 6.29 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 N-Propylbenzene 2.16 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 Styrene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 33 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 ;:lient Sample ID: B-3 Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-9 Date Collected: 02/21/19 13:55 Matrix: Ground Water Date Received: 02/23/19 09:30 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) 3 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 6 Tetrachloroethene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 Tetrahydrofuran <10.0 10.0 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 Toluene 2.08 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 Trichloroethene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 Trichlorofluoromethane <4.00 4.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane <2.00 2.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 17.1 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 5.73 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 Vinyl chloride <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 Xylenes,Total 20.1 3.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 LI 1 Dibromomethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 '' Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 96 80-120 02/25/19 23:46 1 Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) 104 80-120 02/25/19 23:46 1 Toluene-d8(Surr) 102 80-120 02/25/19 23:46 1 Method: 8270D SIM -Semivolatile Organic Compound (GC/MS SIM LL) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Acenaphthene 2.94 1.06 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:04 10 Acenaphthylene <1.06 1.06 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:04 10 Anthracene 1.69 1.06 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:04 10 Benzo[a]anthracene 2.67 1.06 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:04 10 Benzo[a]pyrene 2.08 1.06 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:04 10 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 2.91 1.06 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:04 10 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 1.25 1.06 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:04 10 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 1.27 1.06 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:04 10 Chrysene 3.94 1.06 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:04 10 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene <1 06 * 1.06 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:04 10 Fluoranthene 7.79 1.06 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:04 10 Fluorene 2.34 1.06 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:04 10 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 1.35 1.06 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:04 10 2-Methylnaphthalene <1 06 1.06 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:04 10 Naphthalene 5.64 5.32 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:04 10 Phenanthrene 6.18 1.06 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:04 10 Pyrene 5.85 1.06 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:04 10 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 2-Fluorobiphenyl(Surr) 76 22-110 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:04 10 Nitrobenzene-d5(Surr) 76 17-116 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:04 10 Terphenyl-d14(Surr) 81 10-136 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:04 10 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 34 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-3 Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-9 Date Collected: 02/21/19 13:55 Matrix: Ground Water Date Received: 02/23/19 09:30 Method: WI-GRO-Wisconsin -Gasoline Range Organics (GC) 11 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac4,1 Wisconsin GRO <100 100 ug/L 02/25/19 21:07 1 c Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac G 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 93 80-120 02/25/19 21:07 1 Method: WI-DRO -Wisconsin - Diesel Range Organics (GC) -Silica Gel Cleanup Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Diesel Range Organics(DRO) 0.581 * 0.106 mg/L 02/26/19 08:45 03/01/19 09:54 1 Method: 6020B -Metals (ICP/MS) - Dissolved Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Arsenic <0.00200 0.00200 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/01/19 19:44 1 Barium 0.784 0.00200 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/01/19 19:44 1 Cadmium <0.000500 0.000500 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/01/19 19:44 1 Chromium <0.00500 0.00500 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/01/19 19:44 1 Lead <0.000500 0.000500 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/01/19 19:44 1 Selenium <0.00500 0.00500 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/01/19 19:44 1 iii,-,::- Silver <0.00100 0.00100 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/01/19 19:44 1 Method: 7470A -Mercury (CVAA) - Dissolved Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Mercury <0.000200 0.000200 mg/L 02/26/19 09:34 02/27/19 16:26 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 35 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-4 Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-10 Date Collected: 02/21/19 15:30 Matrix: Ground Water Date Received: 02/23/19 09:30 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) +#s• Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac ., Acetone <10.0 10.0 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 C Allyl chloride <2.00 2.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 6 Benzene <0.500 0.500 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 Bromobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 Bromochloromethane <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 Bromodichloromethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 Bromoform <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 Bromomethane <4.00 4.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 2-Butanone(MEK) <10.0 10.0 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 n-Butylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 sec-Butylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 tert-Butylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 Carbon tetrachloride <2.00 2.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 Chlorobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 Chlorodibromomethane <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 Dichlorofluoromethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 „„ 2 Chloroethane <4.00 4.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 -.1 Chloroform <3.00 3.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 Chloromethane <3.00 3.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 4-Chlorotoluene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 2-Chlorotoluene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane <3.00 3.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 1,2-Dichloroethane <1.00 * 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 1,1-Dichloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 1,1-Dichloroethene <2.00 2.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 1,2-Dichloropropane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 1,3-Dichloropropane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 2,2-Dichloropropane <4.00 4.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 1,1-Dichloropropene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 Diethyl ether <2.00 2.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 Ethylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 Hexachlorobutadiene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 Isopropylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 p-Isopropyltoluene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) <10.0 10.0 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 Methylene Chloride <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 Methyl tert-butyl ether <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 Naphthalene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 N-Propylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 Styrene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 36 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-4 Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-10 Date Collected: 02/21/19 15:30 Matrix: Ground Water Date Received: 02/23/19 09:30 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/1900:10 1 6 Tetrachloroethene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 Tetrahydrofuran <10.0 10.0 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 Toluene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 Trichloroethene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 Trichlorofluoromethane <4.00 4.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane <2.00 2.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 Vinyl chloride <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 Xylenes,Total <3.00 3.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 „- Dibromomethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 97 80-120 02/26/19 00:10 1 Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) 105 80.120 02/26/19 00:10 1 Toluene-d8(Surr) 103 80-120 02/26/19 00:10 1 Method: 8270D SIM -Semivolatile Organic Compound (GC/MS SIM LL) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Acenaphthene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:22 10 Acenaphthylene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:22 10 Anthracene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:22 10 Benzo[a]anthracene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:22 10 Benzo[a]pyrene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:22 10 Benzo[b]fluoranthene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:22 10 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:22 10 Benzo[k]fluoranthene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:22 10 Chrysene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:22 10 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene <1.05 * 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:22 10 Fluoranthene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:22 10 Fluorene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:22 10 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:22 10 2-Methylnaphthalene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:22 10 Naphthalene <5.26 5.26 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:22 10 Phenanthrene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:22 10 Pyrene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:22 10 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 2-Fluorobiphenyl(Surr) 72 22.110 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:22 10 Nitrobenzene-d5(Surr) 73 17-116 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:22 10 Terphenyl-d14(Surr) 73 10-136 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:22 10 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 37 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 -,lient Sample ID: B-4 Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-10 Date Collected: 02/21/19 15:30 Matrix: Ground Water Date Received: 02/23/19 09:30 Method:WI-GRO -Wisconsin -Gasoline Range Organics (GC) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Wisconsin GRO <100 100 ug/L 02/25/19 20:38 1 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 90 80-120 02/25/19 20.38 1 Method:WI-DRO -Wisconsin - Diesel Range Organics (GC) -Silica Gel Cleanup Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Diesel Range Organics(DRO) 0.204 * 0.108 mg/L 02/26/19 08:45 03/01/19 08:52 1 I-- Method: 6020B - Metals (ICP/MS) -Dissolved Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Arsenic 0.00253 0.00200 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/01/19 19:47 1 Barium 0.207 0.00200 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/01/19 19:47 1 Cadmium <0.000500 0.000500 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/01/19 19:47 1 Chromium <0.00500 0.00500 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/01/19 19:47 1 Lead <0.000500 0.000500 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/01/19 19:47 1 Selenium <0.00500 0.00500 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/01/19 19:47 1 Silver <0.00100 0.00100 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/01/19 19:47 1 Method: 7470A -Mercury (CVAA) -Dissolved Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Mercury <0.000200 0.000200 mg/L 02/26/19 09:34 02/27/19 16:28 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 38 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-5 Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-11 Date Collected: 02/21/19 16:45 Matrix: Ground Water Date Received: 02/23/19 09:30 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac kt.,. . Acetone <10.0 10.0 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 Allyl chloride <2.00 2.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 6 Benzene <0.500 0.500 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 Bromobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 Bromochloromethane <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 Bromodichloromethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 Bromoform <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 Bromomethane <4.00 4.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 2-Butanone(MEK) <10.0 10.0 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 n-Butylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 sec-Butylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 tert-Butylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 Carbon tetrachloride <2.00 2.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 Chlorobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 Chlorodibromomethane <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 Dichlorofluoromethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 . Chloroethane <4.00 4.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 •' Chloroform <3.00 3.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 Chloromethane <3.00 3.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 4-Chlorotoluene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 2-Chlorotoluene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane <3.00 3.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 1,2-Dichloroethane <1.00 * 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 1,1-Dichloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 1,1-Dichloroethene <2.00 2.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 1,2-Dichloropropane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 1,3-Dichloropropane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 2,2-Dichloropropane <4.00 4.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 1,1-Dichloropropene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 Diethyl ether <2.00 2.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 Ethylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 Hexachlorobutadiene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 lsopropylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 p-Isopropyltoluene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) <10.0 10.0 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 Methylene Chloride <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 Methyl tert-butyl ether <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 Naphthalene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 N-Propylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 Styrene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 39 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 ;Tient Sample ID: B-5 Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-11 Date Collected: 02/21/19 16:45 Matrix: Ground Water Date Received: 02/23/19 09:30 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) rfl Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac .q 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 6 Tetrachloroethene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 Tetrahydrofuran <10.0 10.0 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 Toluene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 Trichloroethene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 Trichlorofluoromethane <4.00 4.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane <2.00 2.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 Vinyl chloride <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 Xylenes,Total <3.00 3.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 Dibromomethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 95 80-120 02/26/19 00:34 1 Dibromofluoromethane(Sun) 104 80-120 02/26/19 00.34 1 Toluene-d8(Surr) 103 80-120 02/26/19 00:34 1 Method: 8270D SIM -Semivolatile Organic Compound (GC/MS SIM LL) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Acenaphthene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:41 10 Acenaphthylene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:41 10 Anthracene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:41 10 Benzo[a]anthracene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:41 10 Benzo[a]pyrene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:41 10 Benzo[b]fluoranthene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:41 10 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:41 10 Benzo[k]fluoranthene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:41 10 Chrysene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:41 10 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene <1.05 * 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:41 10 Fluoranthene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:41 10 Fluorene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:41 10 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:41 10 2-Methylnaphthalene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:41 10 Naphthalene <5.26 5.26 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:41 10 Phenanthrene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:41 10 Pyrene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:41 10 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 2-Fluorobiphenyl(Surr) 69 22_110 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:41 10 Nitrobenzene-d5(Surr) 71 17-116 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20.41 10 Terphenyl-d14(Surr) 68 10-136 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:41 10 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 40 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-5 Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-11 Date Collected: 02/21/19 16:45 Matrix: Ground Water Date Received: 02/23/19 09:30 Method:WI-GRO -Wisconsin -Gasoline Range Organics (GC) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Wisconsin GRO <100 100 ug/L 02/25/19 20:10 1 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 91 80_120 02/25/19 20:10 1 Method: WI-DRO -Wisconsin - Diesel Range Organics (GC) -Silica Gel Cleanup Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Diesel Range Organics(DRO) 0.175 * 0.105 mg/L 02/26/19 08:45 03/01/19 10:07 1 Method: 6020B -Metals (ICP/MS) - Dissolved Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Arsenic <0.00200 0.00200 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/01/19 20:03 1 Barium 0.484 0.00200 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/01/19 20:03 1 Cadmium <0.000500 0.000500 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/01/19 20:03 1 Chromium <0.00500 0.00500 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/01/19 20:03 1 Lead 0.000580 0.000500 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/01/19 20:03 1 Selenium <0.00500 0.00500 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/01/19 20:03 1 Silver <0.00100 0.00100 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/01/19 20:03 1 Method: 7470A -Mercury (CVAA) - Dissolved Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Mercury <0.000200 0.000200 mg/L 02/26/19 09:34 02/27/19 16:34 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 41 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) Definitions/Glossary Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Qualifiers GC/MS VOA Qualifier Qualifier Description LCS or LCSD is outside acceptance limits. Fl MS and/or MSD Recovery is outside acceptance limits. GC/MS Semi VOA Qualifier Qualifier Description RPD of the LCS and LCSD exceeds the control limits X Surrogate is outside control limits GC Semi VOA Qualifier Qualifier Description LCS or LCSD is outside acceptance limits. X Surrogate is outside control limits Glossary Abbreviation These commonly used abbreviations may or may not be present in this report. Listed under the"D"column to designate that the result is reported on a dry weight basis %R Percent Recovery CFL Contains Free Liquid CNF Contains No Free Liquid tJ DER Duplicate Error Ratio(normalized absolute difference) Dil Fac Dilution Factor DL Detection Limit(DoD/DOE) iL,RA,RE,IN Indicates a Dilution,Re-analysis,Re-extraction,or additional Initial metals/anion analysis of the sample 1LC Decision Level Concentration(Radiochemistry) EDL Estimated Detection Limit(Dioxin) LOD Limit of Detection(DoD/DOE) LOQ Limit of Quantitation(DoD/DOE) MDA Minimum Detectable Activity(Radiochemistry) MDC Minimum Detectable Concentration(Radiochemistry) MDL Method Detection Limit ML Minimum Level(Dioxin) NC Not Calculated ND Not Detected at the reporting limit(or MDL or EDL if shown) PQL Practical Quantitation Limit QC Quality Control RER Relative Error Ratio(Radiochemistry) RL Reporting Limit or Requested Limit(Radiochemistry) RPD Relative Percent Difference,a measure of the relative difference between two points TEF Toxicity Equivalent Factor(Dioxin) TEQ Toxicity Equivalent Quotient(Dioxin) TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 42 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) Surrogate Summary Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Matrix: Ground Water Prep Type: Total/NA Percent Surrogate Recovery(Acceptance Limits) BFB DBFM TOL Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (80-120) (80-120) (80-120) 310-149954-8 B-2 98 103 105 310-149954-9 B-3 96 104 102 310-149954-10 B-4 97 105 103 310-149954-11 B-5 95 104 103 Surrogate Legend 8 BFB=4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) DBFM=Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) TOL=Toluene-d8(Surr) Method: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Matrix: Soil Prep Type: Total/NA Percent Surrogate Recovery(Acceptance Limits) BFB DBFM TOL Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (80-120) (80-120) (80-120) 310-149954-1 B-1 (5-10') 98 93 98 310-149954-2 B-2(15-20') 98 96 98 310-149954-2 MS B-2(15-20') 100 97 98 310-149954-2 MSD B-2(15-20') 97 99 100 310-149954-3 B-3(12.5-15') 96 92 98 310-149954-4 B-4(12.5-15) 98 95 99 310-149954-5 B-5(20-22.5') 101 93 98 310-149954-6 Trip Blank 97 92 99 Surrogate Legend BFB=4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) DBFM=Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) TOL=Toluene-d8(Surr) Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Percent Surrogate Recovery(Acceptance Limits) BFB DBFM TOL Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (80-120) (80-120) (80-120) LCS 310-231050/2-A Lab Control Sample 101 99 98 MB 310-231050/1-A Method Blank 100 97 101 Surrogate Legend BFB=4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) DBFM=Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) TOL=Toluene-d8(Surr) TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 43 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) Surrogate Summary is Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Matrix:Water Prep Type: Total/NA ,., Percent Surrogate Recovery(Acceptance Limits) BFB DBFM TOL Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (80-120) (80-120) (80-120) 310-149954-7 Trip Blank 93 105 103 LCS 310-230851/6 Lab Control Sample 93 106 104 a t, LCS 310-230851/7 Lab Control Sample 95 105 105 1,' MB 310-230851/8 Method Blank 96 101 103 -Vic', Surrogate Legend 8 BFB=4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) v DBFM=Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) TOL=Toluene-d8(Surr) Method: 8270D SIM - Semivolatile Organic Compound (GC/MS SIM LL) Matrix: Ground Water Prep Type: Total/NA Percent Surrogate Recovery(Acceptance Limits) FBP NBZ TPHL Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (22-110) (17-116) (10-136) 310-149954-8 B-2 82 88 140 X 4, ,' 310-149954-9 B-3 76 76 81 310-149954-10 B-4 72 73 73 310-149954-11 B-5 69 71 68 Surrogate Legend FBP=2-Fluorobiphenyl(Surr) NBZ=Nitrobenzene-d5(Surr) TPHL=Terphenyl-d14(Surr) Method: 8270D SIM - Semivolatile Organic Compound (GC/MS SIM LL) Matrix: Soil Prep Type: Total/NA Percent Surrogate Recovery(Acceptance Limits) FBP NBZ TPHL Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (28-110) (22-110) (26-110) 310-149954-1 B-1 (5-10') 63 71 63 310-149954-1 MS B-1 (5-10') 58 64 59 310-149954-1 MSD B-1 (5-10') 61 67 63 310-149954-2 B-2(15-20') 59 104 66 310-149954-3 B-3(12.5-15') 60 75 61 310-149954-4 B-4(12.5-15') 67 90 63 310-149954-5 B-5(20-22.5') 50 119 X 46 Surrogate Legend FBP=2-Fluorobiphenyl(Surr) NBZ=Nitrobenzene-d5(Surr) TPHL=Terphenyl-d14(Surr) TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 44 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) Surrogate Summary Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: 8270D SIM - Semivolatile Organic Compound (GC/MS SIM LL) Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Percent Surrogate Recovery(Acceptance Limits) FBP NBZ TPHL Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (28-110) (22-110) (26-110) 141 LCS 310-231031/2-A Lab Control Sample 58 63 68 MB 310-231031/1-A Method Blank 58 65 63 Surrogate Legend FBP=2-Fluorobiphenyl(Surr) NBZ=Nitrobenzene-d5(Surr) 8 TPHL=Terphenyl-d14(Surr) Method: 8270D SIM - Semivolatile Organic Compound (GC/MS SIM LL) Matrix:Water Prep Type: Total/NA Percent Surrogate Recovery(Acceptance Limits) FBP NBZ TPHL Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (22-110) (17-116) (10-136) LCS 310-230933/2-A Lab Control Sample 57 61 64 LCSD 310-230933/3-A Lab Control Sample Dup 60 64 68 MB 310-230933/1-A Method Blank 65 69 68 Surrogate Legend FBP=2-Fluorobiphenyl(Surr) NBZ=Nitrobenzene-d5(Surr) TPHL=Terphenyl-d14(Surr) Method: WI-GRO -Wisconsin - Gasoline Range Organics (GC) Matrix: Ground Water Prep Type: Total/NA Percent Surrogate Recovery(Acceptance Limits) BFB Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (80-120) 310-149954-8 B-2 91 310-149954-9 B-3 93 310-149954-10 B-4 90 310-149954-11 B-5 91 Surrogate Legend BFB=4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) Method: WI-GRO - Wisconsin - Gasoline Range Organics (GC) Matrix: Soil Prep Type: Total/NA Percent Surrogate Recovery(Acceptance Limits) BF B Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (80-120) 310-149954-1 B-1 (5-10') 95 310-149954-2 B-2(15-20') 101 310-149954-3 B-3(12.5-15') 97 310-149954-4 B-4(12.5-15') 87 310-149954-5 B-5(20-22.5') 119 310-149954-6 Trip Blank 80 Surrogate Legend TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 45 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) Surrogate Summary Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 BFB=4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) Method: WI-GRO -Wisconsin - Gasoline Range Organics (GC) Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Percent Surrogate Recovery(Acceptance Limits) ., BFB Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (80-120) LCS 310-230926/2-A Lab Control Sample 101 LCSD 310-230926/25-A Lab Control Sample Dup 100 MB 310-230926/1-A Method Blank 91 Surrogate Legend 8 BFB=4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) Method: WI-GRO - Wisconsin - Gasoline Range Organics (GC) Matrix:Water Prep Type:Total/NA Percent Surrogate Recovery(Acceptance Limits) BFB Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (80-120) 310-149954-7 Trip Blank 93 LCS 310-230907/5 Lab Control Sample 96 LCSD 310-230907/29 Lab Control Sample Dup 96 "`" MB 310-230907/4 Method Blank 93 Surrogate Legend BFB=4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) Method: 8082A Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) by Gas Chromatography Matrix: Soil Prep Type: Total/NA Percent Surrogate Recovery(Acceptance Limits) DCB1 TCX1 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (10-110) (10-110) 310-149954-1 B-1 (5-10') 63 63 310-149954-2 B-2(15-20') 59 171 X 310-149954-3 B-3(12.5-15') 49 275 X 310-149954-4 B-4(12.5-15') 59 88 310-149954-5 B-5(20-22.5') 43 246 X Surrogate Legend DCB=DCB Decachlorobiphenyl(Surr) TCX=Tetrachloro-m-xylene Method: 8082A - Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) by Gas Chromatography Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Percent Surrogate Recovery(Acceptance Limits) DCB1 TCX1 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (10-110) (10-110) LCS 310-231032/2-A Lab Control Sample 94 89 MB 310-231032/1-A Method Blank 117 X 110 Surrogate Legend DCB=DCB Decachlorobiphenyl(Surr) TCX=Tetrachloro-m-xylene TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 46 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) QC Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Lab Sample ID: MB 310-230851/8 Client Sample ID: Method Blank Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 230851 MB MB Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Acetone <10.0 10.0 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 Allyl chloride <2.00 2.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 Benzene <0.500 0.500 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 Bromobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 Bromochloromethane <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 Bromodichloromethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 Bromoform <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 9 Bromomethane <4.00 4.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 2-Butanone(MEK) <10.0 10.0 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 n-Butylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 sec-Butylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 tert-Butylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 Carbon tetrachloride <2.00 2.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 Chlorobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 Chlorodibromomethane <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 Dichlorofluoromethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 Chloroethane <4.00 4.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 Chloroform <3.00 3.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 Chloromethane <3.00 3.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 4-Chlorotoluene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 2-Chlorotoluene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane <3.00 3.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 1,2-Dichloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 1,1-Dichloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 1,1-Dichloroethene <2.00 2.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 1,2-Dichloropropane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 1,3-Dichloropropane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 2,2-Dichloropropane <4.00 4.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 1,1-Dichloropropene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 Diethyl ether <2.00 2.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 Ethylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 Hexachlorobutadiene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 Isopropylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 p-Isopropyltoluene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) <10.0 10.0 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 Methylene Chloride <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 Methyl tert-butyl ether <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 Naphthalene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 N-Propylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 47 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) QC Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Jlethod: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Lab Sample ID: MB 310-230851/8 Client Sample ID: Method Blank Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 230851 ,%44. MB MB fr Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Styrene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/1920:57 1 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/1920:57 1 Tetrachloroethene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 Tetrahydrofuran <10.0 10.0 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 Toluene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 9 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 Trichloroethene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 Trichlorofluoromethane <4.00 4.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane <2.00 2.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 5 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 ,, ,. Vinyl chloride <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 Xylenes,Total <3.00 3.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 Dibromomethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 MB MB Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 96 80-120 02/25/19 20:57 1 Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) 101 80-120 02/25/19 20:57 1 Toluene-d8(Surr) 103 80_120 02/25/19 20:57 1 [-Lab Sample ID: LCS 310-230851/6 Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 230851 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Acetone 40.0 43.79 ug/L 109 50-150 Allyl chloride 20.0 19.93 ug/L 100 50-150 Benzene 20.0 21.90 ug/L 109 77-120 Bromobenzene 20.0 20.21 ug/L 101 70-120 Bromochloromethane 20.0 24.39 ug/L 122 73-132 Bromodichloromethane 20.0 19.13 ug/L 96 73-120 Bromoform 20.0 13.86 ug/L 69 57.120 2-Butanone(MEK) 40.0 45.08 ug/L 113 50-150 n-Butylbenzene 20.0 19.70 ug/L 99 63-120 sec-Butylbenzene 20.0 19.41 ug/L 97 64-120 tert-Butylbenzene 20.0 19.10 ug/L 95 64-120 Carbon tetrachloride 20.0 20.99 ug/L 105 72.126 Chlorobenzene 20.0 20.41 ug/L 102 74-120 Chlorodibromomethane 20.0 14.60 ug/L 73 66-120 Chloroform 20.0 24.03 ug/L 120 78-121 4-Chlorotoluene 20.0 19.84 ug/L 99 71-120 2-Chlorotoluene 20.0 19.99 ug/L 100 71-120 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 20.0 13.33 ug/L 67 50-150 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 48 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) QC Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Lab Sample ID: LCS 310-230851/6Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 230851 -.' Spike LCS LCS %Rec. "' ' Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits 1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) 20.0 19.35 ug/L 97 71-125 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 20.0 20.74 ug/L 104 66-120 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 20.0 20.08 ug/L 100 67-120 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 20.0 19.40 ug/L 97 68-120 1,2-Dichloroethane 20.0 26.05 * ug/L 130 75-123 1,1-Dichloroethane 20.0 21.73 ug/L 109 75-125 1,1-Dichloroethene 20.0 23.57 ug/L 118 75-124 9 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 20.0 22.75 ug/L 114 77-120 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 20.0 23.99 ug/L 120 75-122 1,2-Dichloropropane 20.0 21.26 ug/L 106 75-123 1,3-Dichloropropane 20.0 21.41 ug/L 107 75-123 2,2-Dichloropropane 20.0 17.67 ug/L 88 50-150 1,1-Dichloropropene 20.0 23.61 ug/L 118 77-124 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 20.0 18.15 ug/L 91 70-120 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 20.0 16.46 ug/L 82 69-120 , , Diethyl ether 20.0 24.23 ug/L 121 71-122 lam[ =,' Ethylbenzene 20.0 20.93 ug/L 105 73-120 Hexachlorobutadiene 20.0 18.34 ug/L 92 50-150 lsopropylbenzene 20.0 19.91 ug/L 100 69-120 p-lsopropyltoluene 20.0 18.99 ug/L 95 68-120 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) 40.0 42.47 ug/L 106 59-126 Methylene Chloride 20.0 23.39 ug/L 117 50-150 Methyl tert-butyl ether 20.0 22.04 ug/L 110 72.121 Naphthalene 20.0 17.30 ug/L 87 50-150 N-Propylbenzene 20.0 20.29 ug/L 101 70-120 Styrene 20.0 20.17 ug/L 101 70-120 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 20.0 17.23 ug/L 86 72-120 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 20.0 20.11 ug/L 101 63-122 Tetrachloroethene 20.0 19.83 ug/L 99 72-129 Tetrahydrofuran 40.0 47.21 ug/L 118 63-128 Toluene 20.0 19.53 ug/L 98 74-120 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 20.0 17.87 ug/L 89 50-150 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 20.0 17.09 ug/L 85 59-120 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 20.0 22.21 ug/L 111 76-127 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 20.0 21.63 ug/L 108 69-127 Trichloroethene 20.0 21.39 ug/L 107 77-123 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 20.0 21.87 ug/L 109 66-120 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane 20.0 23.45 ug/L 117 76-131 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 20.0 18.98 ug/L 95 67-120 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 20.0 19.67 ug/L 98 68-120 Xylenes,Total 40.0 39.03 ug/L 98 69-120 Dibromomethane 20.0 20.96 ug/L 105 76-125 LCS LCS Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 93 80-120 Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) 106 80_120 Toluene-d8(Surr) 104 80-120 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 49 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) QC Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Lab Sample ID: LCS 310-230851/7 Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix: Water -Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 230851 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. g Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Bromomethane 20.0 12.39 ug/L 62 38-150 Dichlorofluoromethane 20.0 19.49 ug/L 97 70-131 Chloroethane 20.0 20.15 ug/L 101 69-129 Chloromethane 20.0 18.75 ug/L 94 50-150 Dichlorodifluoromethane 20.0 22.78 ug/L 114 50-150 Trichlorofluoromethane 20.0 21.98 ug/L 110 68-146 Vinyl chloride 20.0 18.68 ug/L 93 67-133 9 LCS LCS Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 95 80-120 Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) 105 80-120 Toluene-d8(Surr) 105 80-120 Lab Sample ID: MB 310-231050/1-A Client Sample ID: Method Blank Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231052 Prep Batch: 231050 `" '' MB MB Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Acetone <0.480 0.480 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Allyl chloride <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Benzene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Bromobenzene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Bromochloromethane <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Bromodichloromethane <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Bromoform <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Bromomethane <0.480 0.480 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 2-Butanone(MEK) <0.240 0.240 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 n-Butylbenzene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 sec-Butylbenzene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 tert-Butylbenzene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Carbon tetrachloride <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Chlorobenzene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Chlorodibromomethane <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Dichlorofluoromethane <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Chloroethane <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Chloroform <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Chloromethane <0.240 0.240 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 4-Chlorotoluene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 2-Chlorotoluene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 1,2-Dichloroethane <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 1,1-Dichloroethane <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 1,1-Dichloroethene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 50 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) QC Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Lab Sample ID: MB 310-231050/1-A Client Sample ID: Method Blank Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231052 Prep Batch: 231050 'fF ' it Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 1,2-Dichloropropane <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 1,3-Dichloropropane <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 2,2-Dichloropropane <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 1,1-Dichloropropene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 9 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Diethyl ether <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Ethylbenzene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Hexachlorobutadiene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Isopropylbenzene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 p-Isopropyltoluene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Methylene Chloride <0.240 0.240 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Methyl tert-butyl ether <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Naphthalene <0.240 0.240 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 N-Propylbenzene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Styrene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Tetrachloroethene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Tetrahydrofuran <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Toluene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Trichloroethene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Trichlorofluoromethane <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Vinyl chloride <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Xylenes,Total <0.144 0.144 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Dibromomethane <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 MB MB Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 100 80-120 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) 97 80-120 02/27/19 05.39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Toluene-d8(Surr) 101 80-120 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 51 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) QC Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 /lethod: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Lab Sample ID: LCS 310-231050/2-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231052 Prep Batch: 231050 ,G: Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Acetone 1.91 2.254 mg/Kg 118 42-150 Allyl chloride 0.956 1.023 mg/Kg 107 50-150 Benzene 0.956 1.040 mg/Kg 109 75-147 Bromobenzene 0.956 0.9477 mg/Kg 99 77.132 Bromochloromethane 0.956 0.9688 mg/Kg 101 72.150 Bromodichloromethane 0.956 0.9244 mg/Kg 97 74-144 Bromoform 0.956 0.9009 mg/Kg 94 74.124 9 2-Butanone(MEK) 1.91 2.237 mg/Kg 117 50-150 n-Butylbenzene 0.956 1.017 mg/Kg 106 73-131 sec-Butylbenzene 0.956 0.9955 mg/Kg 104 72.129 tert-Butylbenzene 0.956 0.9904 mg/Kg 104 73-128 Carbon tetrachloride 0.956 0.9375 mg/Kg 98 70-144 Chlorobenzene 0.956 0.9747 mg/Kg 102 78-132 Chlorodibromomethane 0.956 0.9810 mg/Kg 103 77-132 Chloroform 0.956 0.9386 mg/Kg 98 69-148 4-Chlorotoluene 0.956 0.9894 mg/Kg 103 74-130 2-Chlorotoluene 0.956 0.9915 mg/Kg 104 72-132 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 0.956 0.8465 mg/Kg 89 50-150 1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) 0.956 0.9927 mg/Kg 104 80-134 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.956 0.9701 mg/Kg 101 76-127 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.956 0.9601 mg/Kg 100 76-126 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.956 0.9549 mg/Kg 100 75-126 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.956 1.049 mg/Kg 110 74-148 1,1-Dichloroethane 0.956 1.054 mg/Kg 110 74-150 1,1-Dichloroethene 0.956 1.039 mg/Kg 109 74-139 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.956 1.015 mg/Kg 106 74.148 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.956 1.024 mg/Kg 107 76-139 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.956 1.068 mg/Kg 112 74-150 1,3-Dichloropropane 0.956 1.027 mg/Kg 107 80-136 2,2-Dichloropropane 0.956 1.079 mg/Kg 113 50-150 1,1-Dichloropropene 0.956 1.030 mg/Kg 108 73-144 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.956 0.9451 mg/Kg 99 78-138 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.956 1.102 mg/Kg 115 77-138 Diethyl ether 0.956 1.037 mg/Kg 108 73-150 Ethylbenzene 0.956 0.9800 mg/Kg 102 78-131 Hexachlorobutadiene 0.956 1.057 mg/Kg 111 50-150 Isopropylbenzene 0.956 0.9803 mg/Kg 103 77-130 p-Isopropyltoluene 0.956 0.9863 mg/Kg 103 73-128 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) 1.91 2.051 mg/Kg 107 64.150 Methylene Chloride 0.956 1.021 mg/Kg 107 50-150 Methyl tert-butyl ether 0.956 1.025 mg/Kg 107 79-146 Naphthalene 0.956 1.138 mg/Kg 119 50-150 N-Propylbenzene 0.956 0.9883 mg/Kg 103 77-132 Styrene 0.956 0.9863 mg/Kg 103 75-138 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.956 0.9182 mg/Kg 96 78-133 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.956 0.9672 mg/Kg 101 78-141 Tetrachloroethene 0.956 0.9919 mg/Kg 104 77-127 Tetrahydrofuran 1.91 2.282 mg/Kg 119 75-149 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 52 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) QC Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Lab Sample ID: LCS 310-231050/2-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231052 Prep Batch: 231050 ., Spike LCS LCS %Rec. + _, Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Toluene 0.956 0.9715 mg/Kg 102 77.134 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 0.956 0.9663 mg/Kg 101 50-150 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.956 0.9450 mg/Kg 99 65-133 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.956 0.9649 mg/Kg 101 74-144 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.956 1.019 mg/Kg 107 80-137 Trichloroethene 0.956 1.024 mg/Kg 107 75-142 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 0.956 0.9487 mg/Kg 99 77-141 9 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane 0.956 1.023 mg/Kg 107 75-138 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.956 0.9975 mg/Kg 104 71-134 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.956 0.9945 mg/Kg 104 72-132 Xylenes,Total 1.91 1.948 mg/Kg 102 76-132 Dibromomethane 0.956 1.033 mg/Kg 108 76-148 LCS LCS Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 101 80-120 Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) 99 80-120 Toluene-d8(Surr) 98 80-120 Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-2 MS Client Sample ID: B-2 (15-20') Matrix: Soil Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231052 Prep Batch: 231050 Sample Sample Spike MS MS %Rec. Analyte Result Qualifier Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Acetone <0.686 2.34 2.929 mg/Kg 125 42.150 Allyl chloride <0.137 1.17 1.299 mg/Kg * 111 42.150 Benzene <0.137 1.17 1.403 mg/Kg * 115 54-150 Bromobenzene <0.137 1.17 1.361 mg/Kg * 116 56-136 Bromochloromethane <0.137 1.17 1.348 mg/Kg * 115 57-150 Bromodichloromethane <0.137 1.17 1.237 mg/Kg * 106 56-149 Bromoform <0.137 1.17 1.152 mg/Kg * 98 52-128 2-Butanone(MEK) <0.343 2.34 2.810 mg/Kg * 120 50-150 n-Butylbenzene <0.137 1.17 1.422 mg/Kg a 122 33-150 sec-Butylbenzene <0.137 1.17 1.414 mg/Kg * 121 26-150 tert-Butylbenzene <0.137 1.17 1.388 mg/Kg * 119 39-148 Carbon tetrachloride <0.137 1.17 1.234 mg/Kg * 105 53-147 Chlorobenzene <0.137 1.17 1.373 mg/Kg 3) 117 59-134 Chlorodibromomethane <0.137 1.17 1.272 mg/Kg * 109 56-136 Chloroform <0.137 1.17 1.286 mg/Kg * 110 49-150 4-Chlorotoluene <0.137 1.17 1.382 mg/Kg * 118 44-149 2-Chlorotoluene <0.137 1.17 1.433 mg/Kg * 122 50-137 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <0.137 1.17 1.028 mg/Kg * 88 38-150 1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) <0.137 1.17 1.366 mg/Kg 117 62-139 1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.137 1.17 1.374 mg/Kg * 117 53-131 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.137 1.17 1.400 mg/Kg * 120 52-132 1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.137 1.17 1.396 mg/Kg a 119 54-131 1,2-Dichloroethane <0.137 1.17 1.401 mg/Kg * 120 54-150 1,1-Dichloroethane <0.137 1.17 1.412 mg/Kg r 121 54-150 1,1-Dichloroethene <0.137 1.17 1.408 mg/Kg * 120 53-142 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 53 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) QC Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-2 MS Client Sample ID: B-2 (15-20') Matrix: Soil Prep Type: Total/NA ?_. Analysis Batch: 231052 Prep Batch: 231050 FA1/4 PI 7gL Sample Sample Spike MS MS %Rec. '.1.,.:1, Analyte Result Qualifier Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.137 1.17 1.396 mg/Kg * 119 53-150 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.137 1.17 1.421 mg/Kg 121 55-144 1,2-Dichloropropane <0.137 1.17 1.464 mg/Kg r 125 57-150 1,3-Dichloropropane <0.137 1.17 1.384 mg/Kg * 118 60-141 2,2-Dichloropropane <0.137 1.17 1.286 mg/Kg * 110 45-150 1,1-Dichloropropene <0.137 1.17 1.383 mg/Kg * 118 54.148 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.137 1.17 1.208 mg/Kg * 103 58-138 9 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.137 1.17 1.379 mg/Kg a 118 58-138 Diethyl ether <0.137 1.17 1.439 mg/Kg * 123 54-150 Ethylbenzene 0.745 1.17 1.408 mg/Kg * 57 48-142 Hexachlorobutadiene <0.137 Fl 1.17 1.599 mg/Kg * 137 12-150 lsopropylbenzene <0.137 1.17 1.353 mg/Kg * 110 44-147 p-Isopropyltoluene <0.137 1.17 1.398 mg/Kg * 119 23-150 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) <0.137 2.34 2.713 mg/Kg * 116 46-150 Methylene Chloride <0.343 1.17 1.417 mg/Kg * 121 50-150 Methyl tert-butyl ether <0.137 1.17 1.372 mg/Kg * 117 60-150 ' Naphthalene 0.610 1.17 1.356 mg/Kg * 64 24.150 N-Propylbenzene 0.253 1.17 1.399 mg/Kg ? 98 44-147 Styrene <0.137 1.17 1.382 mg/Kg * 118 47-150 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.137 1.17 1.239 mg/Kg * 106 59-136 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.137 1.17 1.359 mg/Kg * 116 48-150 Tetrachloroethene <0.137 1.17 1.368 mg/Kg * 117 50-136 Tetrahydrofuran <0.137 2.34 2.759 mg/Kg * 118 48-150 Toluene 1.28 Fl 1.17 1.416 Fl mg/Kg # 12 50-144 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <0.137 1.17 1.293 mg/Kg r 110 33-150 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <0.137 1.17 1.326 mg/Kg * 113 45-133 1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.137 1.17 1.258 mg/Kg * 107 54-150 1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.137 1.17 1.389 mg/Kg * 119 60-146 Trichloroethene <0.137 1.17 1.400 mg/Kg * 120 52-150 1,2,3-Trichloropropane <0.137 1.17 1.279 mg/Kg * 109 60-146 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane <0.137 1.17 1.455 mg/Kg * 124 51-142 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 2.19 Fl 1.17 1.614 Fl mg/Kg * -49 40-143 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.567 1.17 1.456 mg/Kg # 76 48-136 Xylenes,Total 4.53 Fl 2.34 3.037 Fl mg/Kg * -64 40-150 Dibromomethane <0.137 1.17 1.428 mg/Kg * 122 57-150 MS MS Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 100 80-120 Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) 97 80-120 Toluene-d8(Surr) 98 80-120 Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-2 MSD Client Sample ID: B-2 (15-20') Matrix: Soil Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231052 Prep Batch: 231050 Sample Sample Spike MSD MSD %Rec. RPD Analyte Result Qualifier Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits RPD Limit Acetone <0.686 2.24 2.813 mg/Kg 126 42-150 4 40 Allyl chloride <0.137 1.12 1.483 mg/Kg 3' 132 42-150 13 40 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 54 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) QC Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-2 MSD Client Sample ID: B-2 (15-20') Matrix: Soil Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231052 Prep Batch: 231050 + Sample Sample Spike MSD MSD %Rec. RPD - ",; Analyte Result Qualifier Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits RPD Limit Benzene <0.137 1.12 1.503 mg/Kg * 129 54-150 7 23 Bromobenzene <0.137 1.12 1.380 mg/Kg a 123 56-136 1 20 Bromochloromethane <0.137 1.12 1.359 mg/Kg # 121 57-150 1 21 Bromodichloromethane <0.137 1.12 1.313 mg/Kg * 117 56-149 6 20 Bromoform <0.137 1.12 1.250 mg/Kg * 112 52-128 8 36 2-Butanone(MEK) <0.343 2.24 3.002 mg/Kg * 134 50-150 7 19 n-Butylbenzene <0.137 1.12 1.465 mg/Kg * 131 33-150 3 40 9 sec-Butylbenzene <0.137 1.12 1.459 mg/Kg * 130 26-150 3 26 tert-Butylbenzene <0.137 1.12 1.451 mg/Kg * 130 39-148 4 26 Carbon tetrachloride <0.137 1.12 1.367 mg/Kg * 122 53.147 10 19 Chlorobenzene <0.137 1.12 1.434 mg/Kg * 128 59-134 4 20 Chlorodibromomethane <0.137 1.12 1.389 mg/Kg * 124 56-136 9 21 Chloroform <0.137 1.12 1.338 mg/Kg * 119 49-150 4 20 4-Chlorotoluene <0.137 1.12 1.437 mg/Kg * 128 44-149 4 22 2-Chlorotoluene <0.137 1.12 1.445 mg/Kg # 129 50-137 1 24 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <0.137 1.12 1.167 mg/Kg # 104 38-150 13 40 AV 1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) <0.137 1.12 1.366 mg/Kg * 122 62-139 0 20 1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.137 1.12 1.412 mg/Kg * 126 53-131 3 22 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.137 1.12 1.419 mg/Kg * 127 52-132 1 22 1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.137 1.12 1.401 mg/Kg * 125 54-131 0 22 1,2-Dichloroethane <0.137 1.12 1.424 mg/Kg * 127 54-150 2 20 1,1-Dichloroethane <0.137 1.12 1.456 mg/Kg * 130 54-150 3 19 1,1-Dichloroethene <0.137 1.12 1.429 mg/Kg * 128 53-142 1 24 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.137 1.12 1.461 mg/Kg * 130 53-150 5 21 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.137 1.12 1.461 mg/Kg * 130 55-144 3 21 1,2-Dichloropropane <0.137 1.12 1.506 mg/Kg * 134 57-150 3 21 1,3-Dichloropropane <0.137 1.12 1.430 mg/Kg * 128 60-141 3 26 2,2-Dichloropropane <0.137 1.12 1.409 mg/Kg * 126 45-150 9 20 1,1-Dichloropropene <0.137 1.12 1.470 mg/Kg # 131 54-148 6 20 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.137 1.12 1.274 mg/Kg * 114 58-138 5 20 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.137 1.12 1.445 mg/Kg * 129 58-138 5 20 Diethyl ether <0.137 1.12 1.416 mg/Kg * 126 54-150 2 20 Ethylbenzene 0.745 1.12 1.459 mg/Kg * 64 48-142 4 29 Hexachlorobutadiene <0.137 Fl 1.12 1.686 Fl mg/Kg * 151 12-150 5 40 Isopropylbenzene <0.137 1.12 1.448 mg/Kg * 124 44-147 7 23 p-Isopropyltoluene <0.137 1.12 1.450 mg/Kg * 129 23-150 4 25 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) <0.137 2.24 2.702 mg/Kg * 121 46-150 0 31 Methylene Chloride <0.343 1.12 1.437 mg/Kg * 128 50-150 1 22 Methyl tert-butyl ether <0.137 1.12 1.357 mg/Kg * 121 60-150 1 19 Naphthalene 0.610 1.12 1.289 mg/Kg * 61 24-150 5 37 N-Propylbenzene 0.253 1.12 1.439 mg/Kg * 106 44-147 3 35 Styrene <0.137 1.12 1.444 mg/Kg * 129 47-150 4 21 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.137 1.12 1.356 mg/Kg * 121 59-136 9 21 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.137 1.12 1.342 mg/Kg * 120 48-150 1 22 Tetrachloroethene <0.137 1.12 1.482 mg/Kg 132 50-136 8 23 Tetrahydrofuran <0.137 2.24 2.764 mg/Kg 0- 123 48-150 0 38 Toluene 1.28 F1 1.12 1.518 Fl mg/Kg * 21 50-144 7 30 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <0.137 1.12 1.335 mg/Kg * 119 33-150 3 28 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 55 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) QC Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Ilethod: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-2 MSD Client Sample ID: B-2 (15-20') 6,T Matrix: Soil Prep Type: Total/NA `: Analysis Batch: 231052 Prep Batch: 231050 Sample Sample Spike MSD MSD %Rec. RPD Analyte Result Qualifier Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits RPD Limit 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <0.137 1.12 1.312 mg/Kg * 117 45-133 1 30 1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.137 1.12 1.406 mg/Kg * 126 54-150 11 20 1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.137 1.12 1.361 mg/Kg * 122 60-146 2 21 Trichloroethene <0.137 1.12 1.486 mg/Kg * 133 52-150 6 20 1,2,3-Trichloropropane <0.137 1.12 1.363 mg/Kg * 122 60-146 6 22 ;; 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane <0.137 1.12 1.500 mg/Kg * 134 51-142 3 27 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 2.19 Fl 1.12 1.469 Fl mg/Kg r -64 40-143 9 35 9 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.567 1.12 1.459 mg/Kg * 80 48-136 0 28 Xylenes,Total 4.53 Fl 2.24 2.953 Fl mg/Kg * -70 40-150 3 33 Dibromomethane <0.137 1.12 1.395 mg/Kg * 125 57-150 2 21 MSD MSD Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 97 80-120 Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) 99 80-120 OF Toluene-d8(Surr) 100 80-120 `' Method: 8270D SIM - Semivolatile Organic Compound (GC/MS SIM LL) Rab Sample ID: MB 310-230933/1-A Client Sample ID: Method Blank Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 230963 Prep Batch: 230933 I MB MB Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Acenaphthene <0.100 0.100 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 18:50 1 Acenaphthylene <0.100 0.100 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 18:50 1 Anthracene <0.100 0.100 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 18:50 1 Benzo[a]anthracene <0.100 0.100 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 18:50 1 Benzo[a]pyrene <0.100 0.100 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 18:50 1 Benzo[b]fluoranthene <0.100 0.100 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 18:50 1 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene <0.100 0.100 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 18:50 1 Benzo[k]fluoranthene <0.100 0.100 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 18:50 1 Chrysene <0.100 0.100 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 18:50 1 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene <0.100 0.100 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 18:50 1 Fluoranthene <0.100 0.100 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 18:50 1 Fluorene <0.100 0.100 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 18:50 1 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene <0.100 0.100 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 18:50 1 2-Methylnaphthalene <0.100 0.100 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 18:50 1 Naphthalene <0.500 0.500 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 18:50 1 Phenanthrene <0.100 0.100 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 18:50 1 Pyrene <0.100 0.100 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 18:50 1 MB MB Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 2-Fluorobiphenyl(Surr) 65 22-110 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 18:50 1 Nitrobenzene-d5(Surr) 69 17-116 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 18:50 1 Terphenyl-d14(Surr) 68 10-136 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 18:50 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 56 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) QC Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: 8270D SIM - Semivolatile Organic Compound (GC/MS SIM LL) (Continued) Lab Sample ID: LCS 310-230933/2-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 230963 Prep Batch: 230933 = } Spike LCS LCS %Rec. F' r',-", Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Acenaphthene 2.00 1.242 ug/L 62 34-110 Acenaphthylene 2.00 1.287 ug/L 64 36-110 Anthracene 2.00 1.328 ug/L 66 42-110 Benzo[a]anthracene 2.00 1.435 ug/L 72 37-110 Benzo[a]pyrene 2.00 1.346 ug/L 67 36-111 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 2.00 1.363 ug/L 68 36-112 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 2.00 0.9375 ug/L 47 10-122 9 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 2.00 1.488 ug/L 74 37-110 Chrysene 2.00 1.652 ug/L 83 30-110 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 2.00 1.027 ug/L 51 10-122 Fluoranthene 2.00 1.414 ug/L 71 40-110 Fluorene 2.00 1.335 ug/L 67 30-110 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 2.00 1.189 ug/L 59 22-124 2-Methylnaphthalene 2.00 1.224 ug/L 61 35-110 Naphthalene 2.00 1.130 ug/L 56 32-110 Phenanthrene 2.00 1.238 ug/L 62 41-110 Pyrene 2.00 1.405 ug/L 70 39-110 LCS LCS Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits 2-Fluorobiphenyl(Surr) 57 22-110 Nitrobenzene-d5(Surr) 61 17-116 Terphenyl-d14(Surr) 64 10-136 Lab Sample ID: LCSD 310-230933/3-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Dup Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 230963 Prep Batch: 230933 Spike LCSD LCSD %Rec. RPD Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits RPD Limit Acenaphthene 2.00 1.366 ug/L 68 34.110 10 35 Acenaphthylene 2.00 1.390 ug/L 70 36-110 8 35 Anthracene 2.00 1.392 ug/L 70 42-110 5 35 Benzo[a]anthracene 2.00 1.571 ug/L 79 37-110 9 35 Benzo[a]pyrene 2.00 1.475 ug/L 74 36-111 9 35 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 2.00 1.485 ug/L 74 36-112 9 35 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 2.00 1.196 ug/L 60 10-122 24 35 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 2.00 1.626 ug/L 81 37-110 9 35 Chrysene 2.00 1.806 ug/L 90 30-110 9 35 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 2.00 1.538 * ug/L 77 10-122 40 35 Fluoranthene 2.00 1.523 ug/L 76 40-110 7 35 Fluorene 2.00 1.447 ug/L 72 30-110 8 35 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 2.00 1.322 ug/L 66 22-124 11 35 2-Methylnaphthalene 2.00 1.341 ug/L 67 35-110 9 35 Naphthalene 2.00 1.248 ug/L 62 32-110 10 35 Phenanthrene 2.00 1.334 ug/L 67 41-110 7 35 Pyrene 2.00 1.549 ug/L 77 39-110 10 35 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 57 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) QC Sample Results Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: 8270D SIM - Semivolatile Organic Compound (GC/MS SIM LL) (Continued) Lab Sample ID: LCSD 310-230933/3-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Dup Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 230963 Prep Batch: 230933 LCSD LCSD Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits 2-Fluorobiphenyl(Surr) 60 22-110 Nitrobenzene-d5(Surr) 64 17-116 Terphenyl-d14(Surr) 68 10-136 Lab Sample ID: MB 310-231031/1-A Client Sample ID: Method Blank rilil Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231078 Prep Batch: 231031 9 MB MB Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Acenaphthene <0.00979 0.00979 mg/Kg 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 13:36 1 Acenaphthylene <0.00979 0.00979 mg/Kg 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 13:36 1 Anthracene <0.00979 0.00979 mg/Kg 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 13:36 1 Benzo[alanthracene <0.00979 0.00979 mg/Kg 02/26/1914:11 02/27/1913:36 1 Benzo[a]pyrene <0.00979 0.00979 mg/Kg 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 13:36 1 Benzo[b]fluoranthene <0.00979 0.00979 mg/Kg 02/26/1914:11 02/27/1913:361 oi, Benzo[g,h,i]perylene <0.00979 0.00979 mg/Kg 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 13:36 1 ki Benzo[k]fluoranthene <0.00979 0.00979 mg/Kg 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 13:36 1 Chrysene <0.00979 0.00979 mg/Kg 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 13:36 1 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene <0.00979 0.00979 mg/Kg 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 13:36 1 Fluoranthene <0.00979 0.00979 mg/Kg 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 13:36 1 Fluorene <0.00979 0.00979 mg/Kg 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 13:36 1 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene <0.00979 0.00979 mg/Kg 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 13:36 1 2-Methylnaphthalene <0.00979 0.00979 mg/Kg 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 13:36 1 Naphthalene <0.00979 0.00979 mg/Kg 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 13:36 1 Phenanthrene <0.00979 0.00979 mg/Kg 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 13:36 1 Pyrene <0.00979 0.00979 mg/Kg 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 13:36 1 MB MB Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 2-Fluorobiphenyl(Surr) 58 28-110 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 13:36 1 Nitrobenzene-d5(Surr) 65 22-110 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 13:36 1 Terphenyl-d14(Surr) 63 26-110 02/26/19 1411 02/27/19 13:36 1 Lab Sample ID: LCS 310-231031/2-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231078 Prep Batch: 231031 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Acenaphthene 0.129 0.08426 mg/Kg 65 35-110 Acenaphthylene 0.129 0.08680 mg/Kg 67 33.110 Anthracene 0.129 0.09448 mg/Kg 73 37-110 Benzo[a]anthracene 0.129 0.1028 mg/Kg 80 35-110 Benzo[a]pyrene 0.129 0.09745 mg/Kg 76 36-110 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.129 0.09745 mg/Kg 76 33-110 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 0.129 0.09335 mg/Kg 72 15-110 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.129 0.1058 mg/Kg 82 37.110 Chrysene 0.129 0.1180 mg/Kg 91 27-110 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 0.129 0.1209 mg/Kg 94 22-116 Fluoranthene 0.129 0.09367 mg/Kg 73 35-110 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 58 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) QC Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: 8270D SIM - Semivolatile Organic Compound (GC/MS SIM LL) (Continued) Lab Sample ID: LCS 310-231031/2-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231078 Prep Batch: 231031 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Fluorene 0.129 0.08647 mg/Kg 67 32-110 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 0.129 0.09944 mg/Kg 77 30-110 2-Methylnaphthalene 0.129 0.07867 mg/Kg 61 27-110 Naphthalene 0.129 0.07672 mg/Kg 59 24-110 Phenanthrene 0.129 0.08678 mg/Kg 67 37-110 Pyrene 0.129 0.09557 mg/Kg 74 34-110 LCS LCS 9 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits 2-Fluorobiphenyl(Surr) 58 28-110 Nitrobenzene-d5(Surr) 63 22-110 Terphenyl-d14(Surr) 68 26-110 Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-1 MS Client Sample ID: B-1 (5-10') Matrix: Soil Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231078 Prep Batch: 231031 Sample Sample Spike MS MS %Rec. Analyte Result Qualifier Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Acenaphthene <0.0113 0.156 0.09984 mg/Kg * 64 30-110 Acenaphthylene <0.0113 0.156 0.1050 mg/Kg * 67 30-110 Anthracene <0.0113 0.156 0.1024 mg/Kg * 66 23-116 Benzo[a]anthracene <0.0113 0.156 0.1158 mg/Kg * 74 27-110 Benzo[a]pyrene <0.0113 0.156 0.1097 mg/Kg * 70 28-110 Benzo[b]fluoranthene <0.0113 0.156 0.1088 mg/Kg * 70 21-117 Benz*,h,i]perylene <0.0113 0.156 0.1099 mg/Kg * 70 10-114 Benzo[k]fluoranthene <0.0113 0.156 0.1157 mg/Kg 74 27-111 Chrysene <0.0113 0.156 0.1309 mg/Kg * 84 20-110 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene <0.0113 0.156 0.1383 mg/Kg * 89 10-124 Fluoranthene <0.0113 0.156 0.1029 mg/Kg # 66 17-122 Fluorene <0.0113 0.156 0.1014 mg/Kg * 65 25-110 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene <0.0113 0.156 0.1153 mg/Kg * 74 21-115 2-Methylnaphthalene <0.0113 0.156 0.09645 mg/Kg a 62 27-110 Naphthalene <0.0113 0.156 0.09305 mg/Kg 0 60 24-110 Phenanthrene <0.0113 0.156 0.09684 mg/Kg * 62 14-124 Pyrene <0.0113 0.156 0.1020 mg/Kg * 65 17-118 MS MS Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits 2-Fluorobiphenyl(Surr) 58 28-110 Nitrobenzene-d5(Surr) 64 22-110 Terphenyl-d14(Surr) 59 26-110 Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-1 MSD Client Sample ID: B-1 (5-10') Matrix: Soil Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231078 Prep Batch: 231031 Sample Sample Spike MSD MSD %Rec. RPD Analyte Result Qualifier Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits RPD Limit Acenaphthene <0.0113 0.151 0.1055 mg/Kg * 70 30-110 6 40 Acenaphthylene <0.0113 0.151 0.1114 mg/Kg * 74 30-110 6 40 Anthracene <0.0113 0.151 0.1062 mg/Kg * 70 23-116 4 40 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 59 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) QC Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: 8270D SIM - Semivolatile Organic Compound (GC/MS SIM LL) (Continued) Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-1 MSD Client Sample ID: B-1 (5-10') Matrix: Soil Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231078 Prep Batch: 231031 Sample Sample Spike MSD MSD %Rec. RPD Analyte Result Qualifier Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits RPD Limit Benzo[alanthracene <0.0113 0.151 0.1171 mg/Kg * 78 27-110 1 40 Benzo[a]pyrene <0.0113 0.151 0.1104 mg/Kg * 73 28-110 1 40 Benzo[b]fluoranthene <0.0113 0.151 0.1075 mg/Kg * 71 21-117 1 40 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene <0.0113 0.151 0.1101 mg/Kg * 73 10-114 0 40 Benzo[k]fluoranthene <0.0113 0.151 0.1176 mg/Kg * 78 27-111 2 40 Chrysene <0.0113 0.151 0.1318 mg/Kg 0 87 20-110 1 40 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene <0.0113 0.151 0.1404 mg/Kg * 93 10-124 1 40 9 Fluoranthene <0.0113 0.151 0.1032 mg/Kg * 68 17-122 0 40 Fluorene <0.0113 0.151 0.1068 mg/Kg * 71 25-110 5 40 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene <0.0113 0.151 0.1159 mg/Kg * 77 21-115 0 40 2-Methylnaphthalene <0.0113 0.151 0.1014 mg/Kg * 67 27-110 5 40 Naphthalene <0.0113 0.151 0.09616 mg/Kg * 64 24-110 3 40 Phenanthrene <0.0113 0.151 0.09978 mg/Kg * 66 14-124 3 40 Pyrene <0.0113 0.151 0.1031 mg/Kg * 68 17-118 1 40 MSD MSD Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits 2-Fluorobiphenyl(Surr) 61 28-110 Nitrobenzene-d5(Surr) 67 22-110 Terphenyl-d14(Surr) 63 26-110 :_lethod: WI-GRO -Wisconsin - Gasoline Range Organics (GC) Lab Sample ID: MB 310-230907/4 Client Sample ID: Method Blank Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 230907 MB MB Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Wisconsin GRO <100 100 ug/L 02/25/19 12:52 1 MB MB Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 93 80-120 02/25/19 12:52 1 Lab Sample ID: LCS 310-230907/5 Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 230907 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Wisconsin GRO 800 767.0 ug/L 96 80-120 LCS LCS Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 96 80-120 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 60 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) QC Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: WI-GRO - Wisconsin - Gasoline Range Organics (GC) (Continued) Lab Sample ID: LCSD 310-230907/29 Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Dup Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 230907 i",' Spike LCSD LCSD %Rec. RPD Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits RPD Limit Wisconsin GRO 800 771.8 ug/L 96 80-120 1 20 LCSD LCSD Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 96 80-120 Lab Sample ID: MB 310-230926/1-A Client Sample ID: Method Blank 9 Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 230905 Prep Batch: 230926 MB MB Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Wisconsin GRO <9.85 9.85 mg/Kg 02/25/19 10:08 02/25/19 11:52 1 MB MB Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 91 80_120 02/25/19 10:08 02/25/19 11:52 1 Lab Sample ID: LCS 310-230926/2-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 230905 Prep Batch: 230926 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Wisconsin GRO 39.9 44.70 mg/Kg 112 80-120 LCS LCS Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 101 80-120 L Lab Sample ID: LCSD 310-230926/25-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Dup Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 230905 Prep Batch: 230926 Spike LCSD LCSD %Rec. RPD Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits RPD Limit Wisconsin GRO 38.7 40.17 mg/Kg 104 80-120 11 20 LCSD LCSD Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 100 80-120 Method: 8082A - Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) by Gas Chromatography Lab Sample ID: MB 310-231032/1-A Client Sample ID: Method Blank Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231234 Prep Batch: 231032 MB MB Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac PCB-1016 <0.0486 0.0486 mg/Kg 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 15:14 1 PCB-1221 <0.0486 0.0486 mg/Kg 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 15:14 1 PCB-1232 <0.0486 0.0486 mg/Kg 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 15:14 1 PCB-1242 <0.0486 0.0486 mg/Kg 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 15:14 1 PCB-1248 <0.0486 0.0486 mg/Kg 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 15:14 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 61 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) QC Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Vlethod: 8082A - Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) by Gas Chromatography (Continued) Lab Sample ID: MB 310-231032/1-A Client Sample ID: Method Blank Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA '' Analysis Batch: 231234 Prep Batch: 231032 rt MB MB su Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac PCB-1254 <0.0486 0.0486 mg/Kg 02/26/1914:18 02/28/1915:14 1 PCB-1260 <0.0486 0.0486 mg/Kg 02/26/1914:18 02/28/1915:14 1 PCB-1268 <0.0486 0.0486 mg/Kg 02/26/1914:18 02/28/1915:14 1 Polychlorinated biphenyls,Total <0.0486 0.0486 mg/Kg 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 15:14 1 MB MB Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac DCB Decachlorobiphenyl(Surr) 117 X 10-110 02/26/19 14.18 02/28/19 15:14 1 Tetrachloro-m-xylene 110 10-110 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 15.14 1 Lab Sample ID: LCS 310-231032/2-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231425 Prep Batch: 231032 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits PCB-1016 0.326 0.2749 mg/Kg 84 30-110 'i , tz,PCB-1260 0.326 0.2945 mg/Kg 90 24-110y, LCS LCS Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits DCB Decachlorobiphenyl(Surr) 94 10-110 Tetrachloro-m-xylene 89 10-110 Method: WI-DRO -Wisconsin - Diesel Range Organics (GC) Lab Sample ID: MB 310-230909/1-A Client Sample ID: Method Blank Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Silica Gel Cleanup Analysis Batch: 231057 Prep Batch: 230909 MB MB Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Diesel Range Organics(DRO) <6.87 6.87 mg/Kg 02/25/19 11:56 02/27/19 12:02 1 Lab Sample ID: LCS 310-230909/2-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Silica Gel Cleanup Analysis Batch: 231057 Prep Batch: 230909 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Diesel Range Organics(DRO) 99.3 75.28 mg/Kg 76 70-120 Lab Sample ID: LCSD 310-230909/3-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Dup Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Silica Gel Cleanup Analysis Batch: 231057 Prep Batch: 230909 Spike LCSD LCSD %Rec. RPD Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits RPD Limit Diesel Range Organics(DRO) 97.6 91.00 mg/Kg 93 70-120 19 20 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 62 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) QC Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: WI-DRO - Wisconsin - Diesel Range Organics (GC) (Continued) Lab Sample ID: MB 310-230972/1-A Client Sample ID: Method Blank Matrix: Water Prep Type: Silica Gel Cleanup Analysis Batch: 231284 Prep Batch: 230972 MB MB Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Diesel Range Organics(DRO) <0.100 0.100 mg/L 02/26/19 08:45 03/01/19 08:15 1 Lab Sample ID: LCS 310-230972/2-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix:Water Prep Type: Silica Gel Cleanup Analysis Batch: 231284 Prep Batch: 230972 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits 9 Diesel Range Organics(DRO) 2.50 1.938 mg/L 78 75-115 Lab Sample ID: LCSD 310-230972/3-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Dup Matrix: Water Prep Type: Silica Gel Cleanup Analysis Batch: 231284 Prep Batch: 230972 Spike LCSD LCSD %Rec. RPD Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits RPD Limit Diesel Range Organics(DRO) 2.50 1.703 * mg/L 68 75-115 13 20 Method: 6010D - Metals (ICP) Lab Sample ID: MB 310-230938/1-A Client Sample ID: Method Blank Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231118 Prep Batch: 230938 MB MB 1 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Arsenic <3.80 3.80 mg/Kg 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 17:19 1 Barium <0.951 0.951 mg/Kg 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 17:19 1 Cadmium <0.951 0.951 mg/Kg 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 17:19 1 Chromium <0.951 0.951 mg/Kg 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 17:19 1 Lead <4.75 4.75 mg/Kg 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 17:19 1 Selenium <7.13 7.13 mg/Kg 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 17:19 1 Silver <0.951 0.951 mg/Kg 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 17:19 1 Lab Sample ID: LCS 310-230938/2-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231118 Prep Batch: 230938 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Arsenic 191 192.6 mg/Kg 101 80-120 Barium 95.5 90.92 mg/Kg 95 80-120 Cadmium 95.5 92.78 mg/Kg 97 80-120 Chromium 95.5 94.18 mg/Kg 99 80-120 Lead 191 186.4 mg/Kg 98 80-120 Selenium 382 365.1 mg/Kg 96 80-120 Silver 95.5 97.74 mg/Kg 102 80-120 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 63 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) QC Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: 6020B - Metals (ICP/MS) Lab Sample ID: MB 310-230964/1-A Client Sample ID: Method Blank Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231551 Prep Batch: 230964 MB MB Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dii Fac Arsenic <0.00200 0.00200 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/04/19 16:09 1 Barium <0.00200 0.00200 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/04/19 16:09 1 Cadmium <0.000500 0.000500 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/04/19 16:09 1 Chromium <0.00500 0.00500 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/04/19 16:09 1 Lead <0.000500 0.000500 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/04/19 16:09 1 Selenium <0.00500 0.00500 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/04/19 16:09 1 Silver <0.00100 0.00100 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/04/19 16:09 1 9 Lab Sample ID: LCS 310-230964/2-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231551 Prep Batch: 230964 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Arsenic 0.0400 0.04304 mg/L 108 80-120 Barium 0.0400 0.04157 mg/L 104 80-120 Cadmium 0.0200 0.02159 mg/L 108 80-120 Chromium 0.0400 0.04092 mg/L 102 80-120 Lead 0.0200 0.02197 mg/L 110 80-120 Selenium 0.0400 0.04106 mg/L 103 80-120 Silver 0.0200 0.02103 mg/L 105 80-120 Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-10 DU Client Sample ID: B-4 Matrix: Ground Water Prep Type: Dissolved Analysis Batch: 231416 Prep Batch: 230964 Sample Sample DU DU RPD Analyte Result Qualifier Result Qualifier Unit D RPD Limit Arsenic 0.00253 0.002974 mg/L 16 20 Barium 0.207 0.2305 mg/L 11 20 Cadmium <0.000500 <0.000500 mg/L NC 20 Chromium <0.00500 <0.00500 mg/L NC 20 Lead <0.000500 <0.000500 mg/L NC 20 Selenium <0.00500 <0.00500 mg/L NC 20 Silver <0.00100 <0.00100 mg/L NC 20 Method: 7470A - Mercury (CVAA) Lab Sample ID: MB 310-230990/1-A Client Sample ID: Method Blank Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231182 Prep Batch: 230990 MB MB Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dii Fac ' Mercury <0.000200 0.000200 mg/L 02/26/19 09:33 02/27/19 15:29 1 Lab Sample ID: LCS 310-230990/2-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231182 Prep Batch: 230990 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Mercury 0.00167 0.001699 mg/L 102 80-120 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 64 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) QC Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: 7471B - Mercury (CVAA) i Lab Sample ID: MB 310-230824/1-A Client Sample ID: Method Blank Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231136 Prep Batch: 230824 MB MB ' Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Mercury <0.0196 0.0196 mg/Kg 02/26/1910:00 02/27/1912:06 1 Lab Sample ID: LCS 310-230824/2-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231136 Prep Batch: 230824 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits 9 Mercury 0.162 0.1916 mg/Kg 118 80-120 Method: Moisture - Percent Moisture Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-2 DU Client Sample ID: B-2 (15-20') Matrix: Soil Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 230908 Sample Sample DU DU RPD Analyte Result Qualifier Result Qualifier Unit D RPD Limit Percent Moisture 16.5 18.3 % 11 20 Percent Solids 83.5 81.7 % 2 20 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 65 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) QC Association Summary Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 GC/MS VOA Analysis Batch: 230851 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-149954-7 Trip Blank Total/NA Water 8260B 310-149954-8 B-2 Total/NA Ground Water 8260B 310-149954-9 B-3 Total/NA Ground Water 8260B 310-149954-10 B-4 Total/NA Ground Water 8260B 310-149954-11 B-5 Total/NA Ground Water 8260B MB 310-230851/8 Method Blank Total/NA Water 8260B LCS 310-230851/6 Lab Control Sample Total/NA Water 8260B LCS 310-230851/7 Lab Control Sample Total/NA Water 8260B Prep Batch: 231050 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-149954-1 B-1 (5-10') Total/NA Soil 5035 10 310-149954-2 B-2(15-20') Total/NA Soil 5035 310-149954-3 B-3(12.5-15') Total/NA Soil 5035 310-149954-4 B-4(12.5-15') Total/NA Soil 5035 310-149954-5 B-5(20-22.5') Total/NA Soil 5035 310-149954-6 Trip Blank Total/NA Soil 5035 MB 310-231050/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Solid 5035 VC LCS 310-231050/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Solid 5035 310-149954-2 MS B-2(15-20') Total/NA Soil 5035 310-149954-2 MSD B-2(15-20') Total/NA Soil 5035 analysis Batch: 231052 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-149954-1 B-1 (5-10') Total/NA Soil 8260B 231050 310-149954-2 B-2(15-20') Total/NA Soil 8260B 231050 310-149954-3 B-3(12.5-15') Total/NA Soil 8260B 231050 310-149954-4 B-4(12.5-15') Total/NA Soil 8260B 231050 310-149954-5 B-5(20-22.5') Total/NA Soil 8260B 231050 310-149954-6 Trip Blank Total/NA Soil 8260B 231050 MB 310-231050/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Solid 8260B 231050 LCS 310-231050/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Solid 8260B 231050 310-149954-2 MS B-2(15-20') Total/NA Soil 8260B 231050 310-149954-2 MSD B-2(15-20') Total/NA Soil 8260B 231050 GC/MS Semi VOA Prep Batch: 230933 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-149954-8 B-2 Total/NA Ground Water 3510C 310-149954-9 B-3 Total/NA Ground Water 3510C 310-149954-10 B-4 Total/NA Ground Water 3510C 310-149954-11 B-5 Total/NA Ground Water 3510C MB 310-230933/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Water 3510C LCS 310-230933/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Water 3510C LCSD 310-230933/3-A Lab Control Sample Dup Total/NA Water 3510C Analysis Batch: 230963 FLab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-149954-8 B-2 Total/NA Ground Water 8270D SIM 230933 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 66 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) QC Association Summary Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 GC/MS Semi VOA (Continued) Analysis Batch: 230963 (Continued) Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch *, 310-149954-9 B-3 Total/NA Ground Water 8270D SIM 230933 E` 310-149954-10 B-4 Total/NA Ground Water 8270D SIM 230933 1 - 310-149954-11 B-5 Total/NA Ground Water 8270D SIM 230933 MB 310-230933/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Water 8270D SIM 230933 LCS 310-230933/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Water 8270D SIM 230933 LCSD 310-230933/3-A Lab Control Sample Dup Total/NA Water 8270D SIM 230933 • Prep Batch: 231031 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-149954-1 B-1 (5-10') Total/NA Soil 3546 310-149954-2 B-2(15-20') Total/NA Soil 3546 310-149954-3 B-3(12.5-15') Total/NA Soil 3546 Itin 310-149954-4 B-4(12.5-15') Total/NA Soil 3546 310-149954-5 B-5(20-22.5') Total/NA Soil 3546 MB 310-231031/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Solid 3546 LCS 310-231031/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Solid 3546 310-149954-1 MS B-1 (5-10') Total/NA Soil 3546 310-149954-1 MSD B-1 (5-10') Total/NA Soil 3546 Analysis Batch: 231078 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-149954-1 B-1 (5-10') Total/NA Soil 8270D SIM 231031 310-149954-2 B-2(15-20') Total/NA Soil 8270D SIM 231031 310-149954-3 B-3(12.5-15') Total/NA Soil 8270D SIM 231031 310-149954-4 B-4(12.5-15') Total/NA Soil 8270D SIM 231031 310-149954-5 B-5(20-22.5') Total/NA Soil 8270D SIM 231031 MB 310-231031/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Solid 8270D SIM 231031 LCS 310-231031/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Solid 8270D SIM 231031 310-149954-1 MS B-1 (5-10') Total/NA Soil 8270D SIM 231031 310-149954-1 MSD B-1 (5-10') Total/NA Soil 8270D SIM 231031 GC VOA Analysis Batch: 230905 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-149954-1 B-1 (5-10') Total/NA Soil WI-GRO 230926 310-149954-2 B-2(15-20') Total/NA Soil WI-GRO 230926 310-149954-3 B-3(12.5-15') Total/NA Soil WI-GRO 230926 310-149954-4 B-4(12.5-15') Total/NA Soil WI-GRO 230926 310-149954-5 B-5(20-22.5') Total/NA Soil WI-GRO 230926 310-149954-6 Trip Blank Total/NA Soil WI-GRO 230926 MB 310-230926/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Solid WI-GRO 230926 LCS 310-230926/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Solid WI-GRO 230926 LCSD 310-230926/25-A Lab Control Sample Dup Total/NA Solid WI-GRO 230926 Analysis Batch: 230907 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-149954-7 Trip Blank Total/NA Water WI-GRO 310-149954-8 B-2 Total/NA Ground Water WI-GRO 310-149954-9 B-3 Total/NA Ground Water WI-GRO TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 67 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) QC Association Summary Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 GC VOA (Continued) Analysis Batch: 230907 (Continued) Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-149954-10 B-4 Total/NA Ground Water WI-GRO 'i 310-149954-11 B-5 Total/NA Ground Water WI-GRO MB 310-230907/4 Method Blank Total/NA Water WI-GRO LCS 310-230907/5 Lab Control Sample Total/NA Water WI-GRO LCSD 310-230907/29 Lab Control Sample Dup Total/NA Water WI-GRO Prep Batch: 230926 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch z 310-149954-1 B-1 (5-10') Total/NA Soil WI GRO 310-149954-2 B-2(15-20') Total/NA Soil WI GRO 310-149954-3 B-3(12.5-15') Total/NA Soil WI GRO 310-149954-4 B-4(12.5-15') Total/NA Soil WI GRO 10 310-149954-5 B-5(20-22.5') Total/NA Soil WI GRO 310-149954-6 Trip Blank Total/NA Soil WI GRO MB 310-230926/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Solid 5035 LCS 310-230926/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Solid 5035 LCSD 310-230926/25-A Lab Control Sample Dup Total/NA Solid 5035 GC Semi VOA Prep Batch: 230909 r- Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-149954-1 B-1 (5-10') Silica Gel Cleanup Soil WI DRO PREP 310-149954-2 B-2(15-20') Silica Gel Cleanup Soil WI DRO PREP 310-149954-3 B-3(12.5-15') Silica Gel Cleanup Soil WI DRO PREP 310-149954-4 B-4(12.5-15') Silica Gel Cleanup Soil WI DRO PREP 310-149954-5 B-5(20-22.5') Silica Gel Cleanup Soil WI DRO PREP MB 310-230909/1-A Method Blank Silica Gel Cleanup Solid WI DRO PREP LCS 310-230909/2-A Lab Control Sample Silica Gel Cleanup Solid WI DRO PREP LCSD 310-230909/3-A Lab Control Sample Dup Silica Gel Cleanup Solid WI DRO PREP Prep Batch: 230972 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-149954-8 B-2 Silica Gel Cleanup Ground Water 3510C SGC 310-149954-9 B-3 Silica Gel Cleanup Ground Water 3510C SGC 310-149954-10 B-4 Silica Gel Cleanup Ground Water 3510C SGC 310-149954-11 B-5 Silica Gel Cleanup Ground Water 3510C SGC MB 310-230972/1-A Method Blank Silica Gel Cleanup Water 3510C LCS 310-230972/2-A Lab Control Sample Silica Gel Cleanup Water 3510C LCSD 310-230972/3-A Lab Control Sample Dup Silica Gel Cleanup Water 3510C Prep Batch: 231032 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-149954-1 B-1 (5-10') Total/NA Soil 3546 310-149954-2 B-2(15-20') Total/NA Soil 3546 310-149954-3 B-3(12.5-15') Total/NA Soil 3546 310-149954-4 B-4(12.5-15') Total/NA Soil 3546 310-149954-5 B-5(20-22.5') Total/NA Soil 3546 MB 310-231032/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Solid 3546 LCS 310-231032/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Solid 3546 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 68 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) QC Association Summary Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 GC Semi VOA (Continued) Analysis Batch: 231057 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-149954-1 B-1 (5-10') Silica Gel Cleanup Soil WI-DRO 230909 -e 310-149954-2 B-2(15-20') Silica Gel Cleanup Soil WI-DRO 230909 ,`- 310-149954-3 B-3(12.5-15') Silica Gel Cleanup Soil WI-DRO 230909 310-149954-4 B-4(12.5-15') Silica Gel Cleanup Soil WI-DRO 230909 310-149954-5 B-5(20-22.5') Silica Gel Cleanup Soil WI-DRO 230909 MB 310-230909/1-A Method Blank Silica Gel Cleanup Solid WI-DRO 230909 LCS 310-230909/2-A Lab Control Sample Silica Gel Cleanup Solid WI-DRO 230909 LCSD 310-230909/3-A Lab Control Sample Dup Silica Gel Cleanup Solid WI-DRO 230909 Analysis Batch: 231234 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch /... 310-149954-1 B-1 (5-10') Total/NA Soil 8082A 231032 1 310-149954-2 B-2(15-20') Total/NA Soil 8082A 231032 310-149954-3 B-3(12.5-15') Total/NA Soil 8082A 231032 310-149954-4 B-4(12.5-15') Total/NA Soil 8082A 231032 310-149954-5 B-5(20-22.5') Total/NA Soil 8082A 231032 MB 310-231032/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Solid 8082A 231032 Analysis Batch: 231284 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-149954-8 B-2 Silica Gel Cleanup Ground Water WI-DRO 230972 310-149954-9 B-3 Silica Gel Cleanup Ground Water WI-DRO 230972 310-149954-10 B-4 Silica Gel Cleanup Ground Water WI-DRO 230972 310-149954-11 B-5 Silica Gel Cleanup Ground Water WI-DRO 230972 MB 310-230972/1-A Method Blank Silica Gel Cleanup Water WI-DRO 230972 LCS 310-230972/2-A Lab Control Sample Silica Gel Cleanup Water WI-DRO 230972 LCSD 310-230972/3-A Lab Control Sample Dup Silica Gel Cleanup Water WI-DRO 230972 Analysis Batch: 231329 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-149954-3 B-3(12.5-15') Total/NA Soil 8082A 231032 Analysis Batch: 231336 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-149954-2 B-2(15-20') Total/NA Soil 8082A 231032 310-149954-3 B-3(12.5-15') Total/NA Soil 8082A 231032 310-149954-4 B-4(12.5-15') Total/NA Soil 8082A 231032 310-149954-4 B-4(12.5-15') Total/NA Soil 8082A 231032 310-149954-5 B-5(20-22.5') Total/NA Soil 8082A 231032 310-149954-5 B-5(20-22.5') Total/NA Soil 8082A 231032 Analysis Batch: 231425 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch LCS 310-231032/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Solid 8082A 231032 Metals Prep Batch: 230824 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-149954-1 B-1 (5-10') Total/NA Soil 7471 B TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 69 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) QC Association Summary Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Metals (Continued) Prep Batch: 230824(Continued) Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-149954-2 B-2(15-20') Total/NA Soil 7471B k. ', 310-149954-3 B-3(12.5-15') Total/NA Soil 7471B 310-149954-4 B-4(12.5-15') Total/NA Soil 7471B 310-149954-5 B-5(20-22.5') Total/NA Soil 7471B MB 310-230824/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Solid 7471B LCS 310-230824/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Solid 7471B Prep Batch: 230938 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-149954-1 B-1 (5-10') Total/NA Soil 3050B 310-149954-2 13-2(15-20') Total/NA Soil 30506 310-149954-3 B-3(12.5-15') Total/NA Soil 30506 10 310-149954-4 B-4(12.5-15') Total/NA Soil 3050B 310-149954-5 B-5(20-22.5') Total/NA Soil 3050B MB 310-230938/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Solid 3050B LCS 310-230938/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Solid 3050B Prep Batch: 230964 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-149954-8 B-2 Dissolved Ground Water 3010A 310-149954-9 13-3 Dissolved Ground Water 3010A 310-149954-10 B-4 Dissolved Ground Water 3010A 310-149954-11 B-5 Dissolved Ground Water 3010A MB 310-230964/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Water 3010A LCS 310-230964/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Water 3010A 310-149954-10 DU B-4 Dissolved Ground Water 3010A Prep Batch: 230990 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-149954-8 B-2 Dissolved Ground Water 7470A 310-149954-9 B-3 Dissolved Ground Water 7470A 310-149954-10 B-4 Dissolved Ground Water 7470A 310-149954-11 B-5 Dissolved Ground Water 7470A MB 310-230990/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Water 7470A LCS 310-230990/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Water 7470A Analysis Batch: 231118 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-149954-1 B-1 (5-10') Total/NA Soil 6010D 230938 310-149954-2 B-2(15-20') Total/NA Soil 6010D 230938 310-149954-3 B-3(12.5-15') Total/NA Soil 6010D 230938 310-149954-4 B-4(12.5-15') Total/NA Soil 6010D 230938 310-149954-5 B-5(20-22.5') Total/NA Soil 6010D 230938 MB 310-230938/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Solid 6010D 230938 LCS 310-230938/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Solid 6010D 230938 Analysis Batch: 231136 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-149954-1 B-1 (5-10') Total/NA Soil 747113 230824 310-149954-2 B-2(15-20') Total/NA Soil 747113 230824 310-149954-3 B-3(12.5-15') Total/NA Soil 747113 230824 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 70 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) QC Association Summary Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Metals (Continued) Analysis Batch: 231136 (Continued) Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-149954-4 B-4(12.5-15') Total/NA Soil 7471B 230824 - 310-149954-5 B-5(20-22.5') Total/NA Soil 7471B 230824 MB 310-230824/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Solid 7471B 230824 LCS 310-230824/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Solid 7471B 230824 Analysis Batch: 231182 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch t 310-149954-8 B-2 Dissolved Ground Water 7470A 230990 310-149954-9 B-3 Dissolved Ground Water 7470A 230990 310-149954-10 B-4 Dissolved Ground Water 7470A 230990 310-149954-11 B-5 Dissolved Ground Water 7470A 230990 /� MB 310-230990/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Water 7470A 230990 10 LCS 310-230990/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Water 7470A 230990 Analysis Batch: 231416 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-149954-8 B-2 Dissolved Ground Water 6020B 230964 310-149954-9 B-3 Dissolved Ground Water 6020B 230964 310-149954-10 B-4 Dissolved Ground Water 6020B 230964 310-149954-11 B-5 Dissolved Ground Water 6020B 230964 310-149954-10 DU B-4 Dissolved Ground Water 6020B 230964 Analysis Batch: 231551 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch MB 310-230964/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Water 6020B 230964 LCS 310-230964/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Water 6020B 230964 General Chemistry Analysis Batch: 230908 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-149954-1 B-1 (5-10') Total/NA Soil Moisture 310-149954-2 B-2(15-20') Total/NA Soil Moisture 310-149954-3 13-3(12.5-15') Total/NA Soil Moisture 310-149954-4 B-4(12.5-15') Total/NA Soil Moisture 310-149954-5 B-5(20-22.5') Total/NA Soil Moisture 310-149954-2 DU B-2(15-20') Total/NA Soil Moisture TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 71 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) Lab Chronicle Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-1 (5-10') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-1 Date Collected: 02/21/19 11:30 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 02/23/19 09:30 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared '' 'g Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis Moisture 1 230908 02/25/19 11:27 WJF TAL CF Client Sample ID: B-1 (5-10') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-1 Date Collected: 02/21/19 11:30 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 02/23/19 09:30 Percent Solids: 84.9 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Prep 5035 231050 02/27/19 05:39 TCH TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8260B 1 231052 02/27/19 10:22 TCH TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3546 231031 02/26/19 14:11 EAM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8270D SIM 1 231078 02/27/19 15:26 DMD TAL CF Total/NA Prep WI GRO 230926 02/25/19 10:08 CMM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis WI-GRO 1 230905 02/25/19 14:45 DLK TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3546 231032 02/26/19 14:18 EAM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8082A 1 231234 02/28/19 16:08 BBW TAL CF Silica Gel Cleanup Prep WI DRO PREP 230909 02/25/19 11:56 EAM TAL CF Silica Gel Cleanup Analysis WI-DRO 1 231057 02/27/19 12:27 JTA TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3050B 230938 02/26/19 08:00 JNR TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 6010D 2 231118 02/26/19 18:35 CTB TAL CF Total/NA Prep 7471B 230824 02/26/19 10:00 JNR TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 7471B 1 231136 02/27/19 12:35 JNR TAL CF Client Sample ID: B-2 (15-20') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-2 Date Collected: 02/21/19 12:20 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 02/23/19 09:30 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis Moisture 1 230908 02/25/19 11:27 WJF TAL CF Client Sample ID: B-2 (15-20') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-2 Date Collected: 02/21/19 12:20 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 02/23/19 09:30 Percent Solids: 83.5 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Prep 5035 231050 02/27/19 05:39 TCH TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8260B 1 231052 02/27/19 10:46 TCH TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3546 231031 02/26/19 14:11 EAM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8270D SIM 10 231078 02/27/19 15:45 DMD TAL CF Total/NA Prep WI GRO 230926 02/25/19 10:08 CMM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis WI-GRO 1 230905 02/25/19 15:16 DLK TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3546 231032 02/26/19 14:18 EAM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8082A 1 231234 02/28/19 16:19 BBW TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3546 231032 02/26/19 14:18 EAM TAL CF TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 72 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) Lab Chronicle Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-2 (15-20') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-2 Date Collected: 02/21/19 12:20 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 02/23/19 09:30 Percent Solids: 83.5 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis 8082A 50 231336 03/01/19 15:11 BBW TAL CF Silica Gel Cleanup Prep WI DRO PREP 230909 02/25/19 11:56 EAM TAL CF Silica Gel Cleanup Analysis WI-DRO 1 231057 02/27/19 12:40 JTA TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3050B 230938 02/26/19 08:00 JNR TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 6010D 2 231118 02/26/19 18:37 CTB TAL CF Total/NA Prep 7471B 230824 02/26/19 08:52 JNR TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 7471B 1 231136 02/27/19 12:38 JNR TAL CF Client Sample ID: B-3 (12.5-15') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-3 Date Collected: 02/21/19 13:30 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 02/23/19 09:30 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis Moisture 1 230908 02/25/19 11:27 WJF TAL CF 1: Client Sample ID: B-3 (12.5-15') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-3 Date Collected: 02/21/19 13:30 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 02/23/19 09:30 Percent Solids: 72.1 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Prep 5035 231050 02/27/19 05:39 TCH TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8260B 1 231052 02/27/19 11:10 TCH TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3546 231031 02/26/19 14:11 EAM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8270D SIM 10 231078 02/27/19 16:21 DMD TAL CF Total/NA Prep WI GRO 230926 02/25/19 10:08 CMM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis WI-GRO 1 230905 02/25/19 15:47 DLK TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3546 231032 02/26/19 14:18 EAM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8082A 5 231329 03/01/19 17:23 BBW TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3546 231032 02/26/19 14:18 EAM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8082A 1 231234 02/28/19 16:30 BBW TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3546 231032 02/26/19 14:18 EAM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8082A 100 231336 03/01/19 15:21 BBW TAL CF Silica Gel Cleanup Prep WI DRO PREP 230909 02/25/19 11:56 EAM TAL CF Silica Gel Cleanup Analysis WI-DRO 10 231057 02/27/19 12:52 JTA TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3050B 230938 02/26/19 08:00 JNR TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 6010D 3 231118 02/26/19 18:39 CTB TAL CF Total/NA Prep 7471B 230824 02/26/19 08:52 JNR TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 7471B 1 231136 02/27/19 12:44 JNR TAL CF TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 73 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) Lab Chronicle Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-4 (12.5-15') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-4 Date Collected: 02/21/19 15:00 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 02/23/19 09:30 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab t> :r. ;? Total/NA Analysis Moisture 1 230908 02/25/19 11:27 WJF TAL CF Client Sample ID: B-4 (12.5-15') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-4 Date Collected: 02/21/19 15:00 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 02/23/19 09:30 Percent Solids: 69.7 s: Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Prep 5035 231050 02/27/19 05:39 TCH TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8260B 1 231052 02/27/19 11:34 TCH TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3546 231031 02/26/19 14:11 EAM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8270D SIM 10 231078 02/27/19 16:58 DMD TAL CF Total/NA Prep WI GRO 230926 02/25/19 10:08 CMM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis WI-GRO 1 230905 02/25/19 16:25 DLK TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3546 231032 02/26/19 14:18 EAM TAL CF " a Total/NA Analysis 8082A 1 231234 02/28/19 16:41 BBW TAL CF ,: Total/NA Prep 3546 231032 02/26/19 14:18 EAM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8082A 25 231336 03/01/19 15:43 BBW TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3546 231032 02/26/19 14:18 EAM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8082A 1 231336 03/01/19 15:54 BBW TAL CF Silica Gel Cleanup Prep WI DRO PREP 230909 02/25/19 11:56 EAM TAL CF Silica Gel Cleanup Analysis WI-DRO 1 231057 02/27/19 13:05 JTA TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3050B 230938 02/26/19 08:00 JNR TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 6010D 2 231118 02/26/19 18:40 CTB TAL CF Total/NA Prep 7471B 230824 02/26/19 08:52 JNR TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 7471B 1 231136 02/27/19 12:46 JNR TAL CF Client Sample ID: B-5 (20-22.5') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-5 Date Collected: 02/21/19 16:20 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 02/23/19 09:30 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis Moisture 1 230908 02/25/19 11:27 WJF TAL CF Client Sample ID: B-5 (20-22.5') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-5 Date Collected: 02/21/19 16:20 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 02/23/19 09:30 Percent Solids: 44.9 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Prep 5035 231050 02/27/19 05:39 TCH TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8260B 1 231052 02/27/19 11:59 TCH TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3546 231031 02/26/19 14:11 EAM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8270D SIM 10 231078 02/27/19 17:35 DMD TAL CF Total/NA Prep WI GRO 230926 02/25/19 10:08 CMM TAL CF TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 74 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) 0000 Lab Chronicle F, Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-5 (20-22.5') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-5 Date Collected: 02/21/19 16:20 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 02/23/19 09:30 Percent Solids: 44.9 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared ;, Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab ` Total/NA Analysis WI-GRO 1 230905 02/25/19 16:56 DLK TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3546 231032 02/26/19 14:18 EAM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8082A 1 231234 02/28/19 16:51 BBW TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3546 231032 02/26/19 14:18 EAM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8082A 100 231336 03/01/19 16:05 BBW TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3546 231032 02/26/19 14:18 EAM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8082A 1 231336 03/01/19 16:15 BBW TAL CF Silica Gel Cleanup Prep WI DRO PREP 230909 02/25/19 11:56 EAM TAL CF Silica Gel Cleanup Analysis WI-DRO 2 231057 02/27/19 13:17 JTA TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3050B 230938 02/26/19 08:00 JNR TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 6010D 2 231118 02/26/19 18:42 CTB TAL CF Total/NA Prep 7471B 230824 02/26/19 08:52 JNR TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 7471B 10 231136 02/27/19 14:19 JNR TALCF Client Sample ID: Trip Blank Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-6 Date Collected: 02/21/19 08:00 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 02/23/19 09:30 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Prep 5035 231050 02/27/19 05:39 TCH TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8260B 1 231052 02/27/19 12:23 TCH TAL CF Total/NA Prep WI GRO 230926 02/25/19 10:08 CMM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis WI-GRO 1 230905 02/25/19 13:43 DLK TAL CF Client Sample ID: Trip Blank Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-7 Date Collected: 02/21/19 08:00 Matrix: Water Date Received: 02/23/19 09:30 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis 8260B 1 230851 02/25/19 22:58 SJN TAL CF Total/NA Analysis WI-GRO 1 230907 02/25/19 16:51 CMM TALCF Client Sample ID: B-2 Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-8 Date Collected: 02/21/19 12:40 Matrix: Ground Water Date Received: 02/23/19 09:30 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis 8260B 1 230851 02/25/19 23:22 SJN TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3510C 230933 02/25/19 14:38 ACJ TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8270D SIM 10 230963 02/26/19 19:46 DMD TAL CF Total/NA Analysis WI-GRO 1 230907 02/25/19 21:35 CMM TAL CF Silica Gel Cleanup Prep 3510C SGC 230972 02/26/19 08:45 ACJ TAL CF Silica Gel Cleanup Analysis WI-DRO 1 231284 03/01/19 08:39 JTA TAL CF TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 75 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) Lab Chronicle Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Dissolved Prep 3010A 230964 02/26/19 08:02 JNR TAL CF Dissolved Analysis 60208 1 231416 03/01/19 19:40 SAD TAL CF Dissolved Prep 7470A 230990 02/26/19 09:34 JNR TAL CF § Dissolved Analysis 7470A 1 231182 02/27/19 16:23 JNR TAL CF Client Sample ID: B-3 Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-9 Date Collected: 02/21/19 13:55 Matrix: Ground Water Date Received: 02/23/19 09:30 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis 8260B 1 230851 02/25/19 23:46 SJN TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3510C 230933 02/25/19 14:38 ACJ TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8270D SIM 10 230963 02/26/19 20:04 DMD TAL CF Total/NA Analysis WI-GRO 1 230907 02/25/19 21:07 CMM TAL CF Silica Gel Cleanup Prep 3510C SGC 230972 02/26/19 08:45 ACJ TAL CF Silica Gel Cleanup Analysis WI-DRO 1 231284 03/01/19 09:54 JTA TAL CF Dissolved Prep 3010A 230964 02/26/19 08:02 JNR TAL CF Dissolved Analysis 6020B 1 231416 03/01/19 19:44 SAD TAL CF Dissolved Prep 7470A 230990 02/26/19 09:34 JNR TAL CF Dissolved Analysis 7470A 1 231182 02/27/19 16:26 JNR TAL CF Client Sample ID: B-4 Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-10 )ate Collected: 02/21/19 15:30 Matrix: Ground Water Date Received: 02/23/19 09:30 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis 8260B 1 230851 02/26/19 00:10 SJN TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3510C 230933 02/25/19 14:38 ACJ TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8270D SIM 10 230963 02/26/19 20:22 DMD TAL CF Total/NA Analysis WI-GRO 1 230907 02/25/19 20:38 CMM TAL CF Silica Gel Cleanup Prep 3510C SGC 230972 02/26/19 08:45 ACJ TAL CF Silica Gel Cleanup Analysis WI-DRO 1 231284 03/01/19 08:52 JTA TAL CF Dissolved Prep 3010A 230964 02/26/19 08:02 JNR TAL CF Dissolved Analysis 6020B 1 231416 03/01/19 19:47 SAD TAL CF Dissolved Prep 7470A 230990 02/26/19 09:34 JNR TAL CF Dissolved Analysis 7470A 1 231182 02/27/19 16:28 JNR TAL CF Client Sample ID: B-5 Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-11 Date Collected: 02/21/19 16:45 Matrix: Ground Water Date Received: 02/23/19 09:30 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis 8260B 1 230851 02/26/19 00:34 SJN TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3510C 230933 02/25/19 14:38 ACJ TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8270D SIM 10 230963 02/26/19 20:41 DMD TAL CF Total/NA Analysis WI-GRO 1 230907 02/25/19 20:10 CMM TAL CF Silica Gel Cleanup Prep 3510C SGC 230972 02/26/19 08:45 ACJ TAL CF TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 76 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) Lab Chronicle Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-5 Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-11 Date Collected: 02/21/19 16:45 Matrix: Ground Water Date Received: 02/23/19 09:30 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Silica Gel Cleanup Analysis WI-DRO 1 231284 03/01/19 10:07 JTA TAL CF Dissolved Prep 3010A 230964 02/26/19 08:02 JNR TAL CF Dissolved Analysis 6020B 1 231416 03/01/19 20:03 SAD TAL CF Dissolved Prep 7470A 230990 02/26/19 09:34 JNR TAL CF Dissolved Analysis 7470A 1 231182 02/27/19 16:34 JNR TAL CF Laboratory References: TAL CF=TestAmerica Cedar Falls,704 Enterprise Drive,Cedar Falls,IA 50613,TEL(319)277-2401 al TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 77 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) Accreditation/Certification Summary Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 .aboratory: TestAmerica Cedar Falls Unless otherwise noted,all analytes for this laboratory were covered under each accreditation/certification below. Authority Program EPA Region Identification Number Expiration Date Minnesota NELAP 5 019-999-319 12-31-19 The following analytes are included in this report,but the laboratory is not certified by the governing authority. This list may include analytes for which the agency does not offer certification. Analysis Method Prep Method Matrix Analyte 8082A 3546 Soil PCB-1268 8260B Ground Water Dichlorofluoromethane 8260B Water Dichlorofluoromethane 8260B 5035 Soil Dichlorofluoromethane Moisture Soil Percent Moisture Moisture Soil Percent Solids EEI • TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 78 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) Method Summary Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method Method Description Protocol Laboratory 8260B Volatile Organic Compounds(GC/MS) SW846 TAL CF 8270D SIM Semivolatile Organic Compound(GC/MS SIM LL) SW846 TAL CF WI-GRO Wisconsin-Gasoline Range Organics(GC) WI-GRO TAL CF KK 8082A Polychlorinated Biphenyls(PCBs)by Gas Chromatography SW846 TAL CF t WI-DRO Wisconsin-Diesel Range Organics(GC) WI-DRO TAL CF 6010D Metals(ICP) SW846 TAL CF 6020B Metals(ICP/MS) SW846 TAL CF 7470A Mercury(CVAA) SW846 TAL CF 7471 B Mercury(CVAA) SW846 TAL CF Moisture Percent Moisture EPA TAL CF 3010A Preparation, Total Metals SW846 TAL CF 30506 Preparation, Metals SW846 TAL CF 3510C Liquid-Liquid Extraction(Separatory Funnel) SW846 TAL CF 3510C SGC Liquid-Liquid Extraction(Separatory Funnel) SW846 TAL CF 3546 Microwave Extraction SW846 TAL CF 5030B Purge and Trap SW846 TAL CF 5035 Closed System Purge and Trap SW846 TAL CF 7470A Preparation,Mercury SW846 TAL CF 7471 B Preparation,Mercury SW846 TAL CF WI DRO PREP Wisconsin Extraction(Diesel Range Organics) WI-DRO TAL CF EE1 WI GRO Closed System Purge and Trap WI-GRO TAL CF Protocol References: EPA=US Environmental Protection Agency SW846="Test Methods For Evaluating Solid Waste,Physical/Chemical Methods",Third Edition,November 1986 And Its Updates. WI-DRO="Modified DRO: Method For Determining Diesel Range Organics",Wisconsin DNR,Publ-SW-141,September,1995. WI-GRO="Modified GRO: Method For Determining Gasoline Range Organics",Wisconsin DNR,Publ-SW-140,September,1995. Laboratory References: TAL CF=TestAmerica Cedar Falls,704 Enterprise Drive,Cedar Falls,IA 50613,TEL(319)277-2401 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 79 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) TestAmerica 111 1111111 1 THE LEADER IN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING 310-149954 Chain of Custody Cooler/Sample Receipt and Temperature Log Form Client Information ' Client: «A Qfl v J • City/State: Project: 'c�t�.pl r3 . P1��t1 rte� E, s\OCA r r tileacl N IV , Receipt Information Date/Time Received:2,23, n 3O Received By: LAB ; Delivery Type: ❑UPS © FedEx SR`s' ❑FedEx Ground ❑US Mail ❑Spee-Dee ; TA Courier D TA Field Services ❑Client Drop-off ❑Other: 'i Condition of Cooler/Containers Sample(s)received in Cooler? 5 Yes ❑No If yes: Cooler ID: Multiple Coolers? g Yes ❑No If yes: Cooler# 1 of 3 # Cooler Custody Seals Present? (5g Yes ❑No If yes: Cooler custody seals intact? Iii Yes ❑No ‘)':-(1 Sample Custody Seals Present? ❑Yes J No If yes: Sample custody seals intact? ❑Yes ❑No Trip Blank Present? R]Yes ❑No If yes: Which VOA samples are in cooler? 1 14 1 I, Temperature Record Coolant: ®Wet ice ❑ Blue ice ❑Dry ice ❑Other: ❑NONE Thermometer ID: is Correction Factor(°C): -i-c), Q •Temp Blank Temperature—If no temp blank,or temp blank temperature above criteria,proceed to Sample Container Temperature Uncorrected Temp(°C): i .5 Corrected Temp(°C): f i •Sample Container Temperature Container type(s) used: Uncorrected Temp(°C): Corrected Temp(°C): Exceptions Noted 1) If temperature exceeds criteria,was sample(s) received same day of sampling? ❑Yes ❑No a) If yes: Is there evidence that the chilling process began? ❑Yes ❑No 2) If temperature is<0°C,are there obvious signs that the integrity of sample containers is compromised? (e.g., bulging septa,broken/cracked bottles,frozen solid?) ❑Yes ❑No NOTE: If yes,contact PM before proceeding. If no,proceed with login a Additional Comments f Document:CF-LG-WI-002 Revision:23 General temperature criteria is 0 to 6°C Date:12/31/2017 TestAmerica-Cedar Falls Bacteria temperature criteria is 0 to 10°C Page 80 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) I Tp } �m �ry./�►�y ( Place COC scanning label �i�l �[I ! 1�114�.�i 2here INC LEADER IN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING i , zt Cooler/Sample Receipt and Temperature Log Form Client Information Client: W ux City/State: m/ti n' pIA Project: U S\oile r I eOn( � 4. Receipt Information 3 Date/Time Received:2, 23, D Received By: LAB Delivery Type: ❑UPS ig FedEx 3 X+ ❑FedEx Ground ❑US Mail ❑Spee-Dee ❑TA Courier ❑TA Field Services ❑Client Drop-off ❑Other: Condition of Cooler/Containers Sample(s)received in Cooler? [(Yes ❑No If yes: Cooler ID: Multiple Coolers? ®Yes ❑No If yes: Cooler# 2- of Cooler Custody Seals Present? 15g Yes ❑No If yes: Cooler custody seals intact? E/ Yes ❑No i Sample Custody Seals Present? ❑Yes KI No If yes: Sample custody seals intact? ❑Yes ❑No 14 Trip Blank Present? ❑Yes ril No If yes: Which VOA samples are in cooler? 1 Temperature Record . Coolant: ®Wet ice ❑Blue ice ❑Dry ice ❑Other: ❑NONE f Thermometer ID: N Correction Factor(°C): AID.0 •Temp Blank Temperature-If no temp blank,or temp blank temperature above criteria,proceed to Sample Container Temperature Uncorrected Temp(°C): O. le., Corrected Temp(°C): O, •Sample Container Temperature Container type(s)used: Uncorrected Temp(°C): Corrected Temp(°C): Exceptions Noted 1) If temperature exceeds criteria,was sample(s)received same day of sampling? ❑Yes ❑No a) If yes: Is there evidence that the chilling process began? ❑Yes ❑No 2) If temperature is<0°C,are there obvious signs that the integrity of sample containers is compromised? (e.g., bulging septa,broken/cracked bottles,frozen solid?) ❑Yes ❑No NOTE: If yes,contact PM before proceeding. If no,proceed with login i. Additional Comments ti Document:CF-LG-WI-002 Revision:23 General temperature criteria is 0 to 6°C Date:12/31/2017 TestAmerica-Cedar Falls Bacteria temperature criteria is 0 to 10'C Page 81 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) I 4 { Place COC scanning label Testmer�ea i here THE LEADER IN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING Cooler/Sample Receipt and Temperature Log Form Client Information r Client: i Qtrit City/State: Mc0� p - Mg Project: US`ccr k1`eadokkW„, Receipt Information Date/Time Received:2,23, rj, 130 Received By: LAE, Delivery Type: ❑UPS 12 FedEx SO.+ ❑FedEx Ground ❑US Mail ❑Spee-Dee ,; ❑TA Courier ❑TA Field Services ❑Client Drop-off ❑Other: l Condition of Cooler/Containers Sample(s)received in Cooler? 51 Yes El No If yes: Cooler ID: Multiple Coolers? ®Yes ❑No If yes: Cooler# 3 of 3 I Cooler Custody Seals Present? 51 Yes ❑No If yes: Cooler custody seals intact? RI Yes ❑No A Sample Custody Seals Present? ❑Yes 5E1 No If yes: Sample custody seals intact? El Yes ❑No Trip Blank Present? [7.1 Yes ❑No If yes: Which VOA samples are in cooler? 1 QUA St r U is t.(S Cn. t CA L.0-6__.. Temperature Record Coolant: ®Wet ice ❑Blue ice ❑Dry ice ❑Other: ❑NONE Thermometer ID: tA Correction Factor(CC): +p, 0 a Temp Blank Temperature-If no temp blank,or temp blank temperature above criteria,proceed to Sample Container Temperature Uncorrected Temp(SC): t . i- Corrected Temp(SC): t I ti., •Sample Container Temperature Container type(s) used: Uncorrected Temp(CC): Corrected Temp(IC): Exceptions Noted 1) If temperature exceeds criteria,was sample(s)received same day of sampling? ❑Yes ❑No a) If yes: Is there evidence that the chilling process began? ❑Yes ❑No 2) If temperature is<0°C,are there obvious signs that the integrity of sample containers is compromised? (e.g., bulging septa,broken/cracked bottles,frozen solid?) ❑Yes ❑No NoTE: If yes,contact PM before proceeding. If no,proceed with login Additional Comments Document:CF-LG-WI-002 Revision:23 General temperature criteria is 0 to 6°C Date:12/31/2017 TestAmerica-Cedar Falls Bacteria temperature criteria is 0 to 10°C Page 82 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) TestAmerica Cedar Falls Division Phone 319-277-2401 or 800-750-2401 To assist us in using the proper analytical methods, 704 Enterprise Drive Fax 319-277-2425 is this work being conducted for regulatory purposes? THE LEADER IN ENVIRONME TAL E TIINNG '�//Cedar Falls,IA 50613 Compliance Monitoring Client Name: �/V�y�/�t �' Client#: S�D3 , iveaclou_)Address: I,/vtOV piot,e:r c eie C' ,01,- Project Name: itt � City/State/Zip Code: ( Y" ""i i/c f�p(t`!1^ ` j V� Project#: S 503 " 000 ,�{ ^, Manager: t 1` ("r tto i'1 e v Project �t �t�y� bS'� � Site/Location ID: D t"Q►10/ /►�""%+ State: r Niix0 1E-tict f$u c,K (DOI t Cu e-:C'CO',ri UjWIC..V"v(A i Report To: ill Chi.11� (iv si:4eJ it'Cor y d ircotv7 Email Address: ((� rt ,� -- Avid Telephone Number: &12 807 32.'79 Fax: — Invoice To: ivi'?/iS5Gk Sampler Name:(Print Name) C bINS - _A Quote#: PO#: Sampler Signature: Matrix Preservation&#of Containers Analyze For: TStandard 3 n o J, ////QC None Rush(surcharges may apply) T) m co r ..:;/1X Level 2 o .32 rn (Batch OC) Date Needed: I weel` o ' �.) _Level 3 a a n o �� I Level 4 Fax Results: Y p a a v m m 0 m 7 m E m o % COther: co Email Results: !Y I N N 2 c, i i? `� ` �� SAMPLE ID V �° E II 2 3 33 °z o q o fi `�../ '� s 03 w o 1= O ii. rho 3 x x z x" z REMARKS o R _ 1 (S—1 o') aJtIJ l t3 o is - ----- 2 3 - P< 2( X )( X ) co a -2 (15 -20'� 1"12a 1, 3 AXKi< X x x' 0-3 '11..s :5) i3 3 , Z 3 -- )( X X A y X _ 13 -k )1.S - is-'5? i 5 0 0 - 2 3 - )C 4 XC A 7< )C _ g -5 zo - 22,5 16zo ` V2 3 - ,t x X T /ank ztl v8ao '\/ — ----- 1 _ , NI 4 8 __(...,.. , ..--, .....------- _• . , _,.... r\A (3.'—' 6 i / // ? — Special Instructions: LABORATORY COMMENTS: TestAmE : neapoiis SC w 4 t jV Relinquished By: Date:/zZ�'Time „f" Received By `.'�l t 1, ~{X Dates 33t9 Tim+}i) ; p Relinquished By: f ii " ,V....l ate:" Ti�e7k/" Received B dr'L,j . 6alpitll/Date:23•/9Tiriao -- Relinquished By: Date: lime: Received By: Date: Time: X(D TAL-0033(0708) ` 5 Page ` of , 19 -- . ...OP, IP TE.,.,,imeri ca Cedar Falls Division Phone 319-277-2401 or 50-2401 To assist us in using the proper analytical methods, 704 Enterprise Drive Fax 319-277-2425 Cedar Falls,IA 50613 is this work being conducted for regulatory purposes? THE LEADER IN ENVIRONME TAL TTEpS,TI�NGp�^ £ Compliance Monitoring Client Name: ���` `� Client#: J� t Address: ` Q�CO £' r- C`re.-e.1( fele-- I f 3 ! c) ( vjf��i`' f� (� M x'41 Project Name: S i V} C1 I� Cj Y " !e- 1"'1 Lt.iy\�1 I } Project#: (3 5 6 0/ — 04c 3 City/State/ZipCode: J� (� ,/� Project Manager: D 1` tie- 1 O S d'- e l( Site/Location ID: Toilet State: N 1 Email Address: �A ( �� (.a p IA d`l��R6iJ J ! , iv,. CtLhrsLi[3 Wei C«LvVnepvrtTo: 1cj�e',uQ.. 1( i cor"y ft- Telephone t' Tele hone Number: . Z / ,Z Fax: "'"''iJ Invoice To: / 1's S C, Li i Sampler Name:(Print Name) ( • d , if Or Quote#: PO#: Sampler Signature: Matrix Preservation&#of Containers Analyze Far T a OC Deliverables Standard �,S None Rush(surcharges may apply) 1 w•s — =cn }(Level 2 o Ilk!!1 (Batch OC) Date Needed: ve '' E Level 3 oa " 0Level4 Fax Results: Y ti. n U © T' Other: E EEmail Results: NSD CO M cnLSAMPLEID 1 g • d oC1- o t= cs IL 3 c x z x" REMARKS o1121 IMII h 2/L1 , PC ®...=�.IIMc�MIEMINIIII c :3 i X40 yes� r ©©Enirl���El — 7- — x 0© ® I�� 13 - Ll 1530 ME 1 7 Z — X ©®®® Mill F,-s ► •6 LIS r ►iiiiiii 2. — .> © >< (X ® MIMI ��.■.. 11111.11,_1M___ MINIM _ �■■M —__� MIIIMINIIIIII Special Instructions: MI- LABORATORYCOMMENTS 1.` c a� 0 A IsiAl.5 1 V t / 7stAmerica Minneapolis Sc iY 5 Relinquished By: Date: Time: `j"Recet e: 2/25/2019 . Login Container Summary Report 310-149954 Temperature readings Container Preservative Client Sample ID I.ab ID Container Type Ali Added(pis) Lot 4 13-2 310-149954-A-8 Plastic 250m1-with Nitric Acid -2 2203339 11-2 310-149954-D-8 Amber Glass I liter-Hydrochloric 13_; 310-149954-A-9 Plastic 250m1-with Nitric Acid >2 2.5 2203839 ,t_; 310-149954-1)-9 Amber Glass 1 liter- Hydrochloric i;_4 310-149954-A-10 Plastic 250m1-with Nitric Acid >2 2.5 2203839 I3_4 310-149954-D-10 Amber Glass 1 liter-Hydrochloric 13-5 310-149954-A-11 Plastic 250m1 -with Nitric Acid <2 2203839 It-5 310-149954-1)-11 Amber Glass 1 liter-Hydrochloric "S tfii kiiEril s t I I 1 I'dy.c I of I 1 Page 85 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) Login Sample Receipt Checklist Client:Wenck Associates, Inc Job Number: 310-149954-1 SDG Number: B5503-0003 Login Number: 149954 List Source:TestAmerica Cedar Falls List Number: 1 Creator: Homolar, Dana J Question Answer Comment Radioactivity wasn't checked or is<1=background as measured by a survey N/A meter. The cooler's custody seal, if present, is intact. True Sample custody seals, if present, are intact. True The cooler or samples do not appear to have been compromised or True tampered with. Samples were received on ice. True Cooler Temperature is acceptable. True Cooler Temperature is recorded. True COC is present. True COC is filled out in ink and legible. True COC is filled out with all pertinent information. True Is the Field Sampler's name present on COC? True There are no discrepancies between the containers received and the COC. True Samples are received within Holding Time(excluding tests with immediate True HTs) Sample containers have legible labels. True ontainers are not broken or leaking. True Sample collection date/times are provided. True Appropriate sample containers are used. True Sample bottles are completely filled. True Sample Preservation Verified. True There is sufficient vol. for all requested analyses, incl. any requested True MS/MSDs Containers requiring zero headspace have no headspace or bubble is True <6mm (1/4"). Multiphasic samples are not present. True Samples do not require splitting or compositing. True Residual Chlorine Checked. N/A TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 86 of 86 3/20/2019 (Rev. 1) y` S }£. ilil //� cat ... . ,..6"*.'5,5-,.!A*: ?I TestAmericas.„:.,41, :„t.i.•31,-,;,.,t ; F ` THE LEADER IN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING , , . ` u ANALYTICAL REPORT .Xr TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. TestAmerica Cedar Falls a r 704 Enterprise Drive Cedar Falls, IA 50613 Tel: (319)277-2401 TestAmerica Job I D: 310-149954-1 TestAmerica Sample Delivery Group: B-5503-0003 "" Client Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows - Orono, MN i For: � 4IkbWenck Associates, Inc 1802 Wooddale Drive Suite 100 ,.---:.,,-1,„,,,,,-.-,-z,.,-:-;z,. Woodbury, Minnesota 55125 • Attn: Michelle Hosfield } � 4 sf t � 7* -- . -�i ,f\� i j Authorized for release by: 3/5/2019 1:05:36 PM R' Zach Bindert, Project Manager Iyr (319)227-2401 zach.bindert@testamericainc.com yx` . , r , resu tt t R ugh' J Have a Question? sk— �� This report has been electronically signed and authorized by the signatory.Electronic signature is ntended to be the legally binding equivalent of a traditionally handwritten signature. Exere t a Results relate onlyto the items tested and the sam /e s as received by the labor ator . Visit us at. J www.testa ricain . om , ' Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 in Table of Contents Cover Page 1 Table of Contents 2 Case Narrative 3 Sample Summary 6 Detection Summary 7 Client Sample Results 11 Definitions 42 Surrogate Summary 43 QC Sample Results 47 QC Association 66 Chronicle 72 Certification Summary 78 Method Summary 79 Chain of Custody 80 Receipt Checklists 86 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 2 of 86 3/5/2019 Case Narrative Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Job ID: 310-149954-1 Laboratory: TestAmerica Cedar Falls Narrative Job Narrative 310-149954-1 Comments No additional comments. Receipt The samples were received on 2/23/2019 9:30 AM;the samples arrived in good condition, properly preserved and,where required, on ice. The temperatures of the 3 coolers at receipt time were 0.6°C, 1.3°C and 1.4°C. GC/MS VOA Method(s)8260B:The following sample(s)were collected in properly preserved vials for analysis of volatile organic compounds(VOCs). However,the pH was outside the required criteria when verified by the laboratory, and corrective action was not possible: B-2 (310-149954-8), B-3(310-149954-9)and B-4(310-149954-10). Method(s)8260B:The laboratory control sample(LCS)for analytical batch 310-230851 recovered outside control limits for the following analyte: 1,2-Dichloroethane. The analyte was biased high in the LCS and was not detected in the associated samples;therefore,the data have been reported. Method(s)8260B:The continuing calibration verification(CCV)associated with batch 310-231052 recovered above the upper control limit for trans-1,3-Dichloropropene(25.9%D). The samples associated with this CCV were non-detects for the affected analytes;therefore,the data have been reported. The following sample is impacted: (CCV 310-231052/3). No additional analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described above or in the Definitions/Glossary page. GC/MS Semi VOA Method(s)8270D SIM:The following samples were diluted due to the nature of the sample matrix: B-2(310-149954-8), B-3 (310-149954-9), B-4(310-149954-10)and B-5(310-149954-11). Elevated reporting limits(RLs)are provided. Method(s)8270D SIM: Surrogate recovery for the following sample was outside control limits: B-2(310-149954-8). Evidence of matrix interference is present;therefore, re-extraction and/or re-analysis was not performed. Method(s)8270D SIM:The RPD of the laboratory control sample(LCS)and laboratory control sample duplicate(LCSD)for batch preparation batch 310-230933 and analytical batch 310-230963 recovered outside control limits for the following analytes: Dibenz(a,h)anthracene. Method(s)8270D SIM:The following samples were diluted due to the nature of the sample matrix: B-2(15-20')(310-149954-2), B-3 (12.5-15')(310-149954-3), B-4(12.5-15')(310-149954-4)and B-5(20-22.5')(310-149954-5). Elevated reporting limits(RLs)are provided. Method(s)8270D SIM: Surrogate recovery for the following sample was outside control limits: B-5(20-22.5')(310-149954-5). Evidence of matrix interference is present; therefore, re-extraction and/or re-analysis was not performed. No additional analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described above or in the Definitions/Glossary page. GC VOA Method(s)WI-GRO:The following samples were collected in properly preserved vials for analysis of volatile organic compounds(VOCs). However,the pH was outside the required criteria when verified by the laboratory, and corrective action was not possible: B-2 (310-149954-8)and B-3(310-149954-9). No additional analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described above or in the Definitions/Glossary page. GC Semi VOA Method(s)8082A:The continuing calibration verification(CCV)associated with batch 310-231234 recovered above the upper control limit for PCB-1254. The samples associated with this CCV were non-detects for the affected analytes;therefore,the data have been reported. The following sample is impacted: (CCV 310-231234/13). TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 3 of 86 3/5/2019 Case Narrative Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 IV—lob ID: 310-149954-1 (Continued) Eill Laboratory: TestAmerica Cedar Falls (Continued) Method(s)8082A:The continuing calibration verification(CCV)associated with batch 310-231234 recovered above the upper control limit for PCB-1254.The samples associated with this CCV which were non-detects for the affected analytes; have been reported. Method(s)8082A:The surrogate recovery for the blank associated with preparation batch 310-231032 and analytical batch 310-231234 was outside the upper control limits. Method(s)8082A:The continuing calibration verification(CCV)associated with batch 310-231425 recovered above the upper control limit for PCB-1221. The samples associated with this CCV were non-detects for the affected analytes;therefore,the data have been reported. Method(s)8082A: Surrogate recovery for the following sample was outside control limits: B-5(20-22.5')(310-149954-5), B-2(15-20') (310-149954-2)and B-3(12.5-15')(310-149954-3. Evidence of matrix interference is present;therefore, re-extraction and/or re-analysis was not performed. Method(s)8082A:The following samples were diluted due to the nature of the sample matrix: B-2(15-20')(310-149954-2), B-3(12.5-15') (310-149954-3), B-4(12.5-15')(310-149954-4)and B-5(20-22.5')(310-149954-5). Elevated reporting limits(RLs)are provided. Method(s)8082A:The continuing calibration verification(CCV)associated with batch 310-231329 recovered above the upper control limit for PCB-1016. The samples associated with this CCV were non-detects for the affected analytes;therefore,the data have been reported. Method(s)WI-DRO: Significant peaks, readily distinguished from background,were detected in the following samples within five minutes after the end of the analytical window defined by the last component eluting in the Diesel Range Organics(DRO)mix(i.e., n-Octacosane): B-2(15-20')(310-149954-2), B-3(12.5-15')(310-149954-3), B-4(12.5-15')(310-149954-4)and B-5(20-22.5')(310-149954-5). lethod(s)WI-DRO: Significant peaks, readily distinguished from background,were detected in the following samples within five minutes fter the end of the analytical window defined by the last component eluting in the Diesel Range Organics(DRO)mix(i.e., n-Octacosane): B-4(310-149954-10)and B-5(310-149954-11). Method(s)WI-DRO:The laboratory control sample(LCS)for preparation batch 310-230972 and analytical batch 310-231284 recovered outside acceptance limits for DRO. There was insufficient sample to perform a re-extraction or re-analysis;therefore,the data have been reported. No additional analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described above or in the Definitions/Glossary page. Metals Method(s)3010A:The reference method requires samples to be preserved to a pH of<2. The following samples were received with insufficient preservation at a pH of>2: B-3(310-149954-9), B-4(310-149954-10)and(310-149954-A-10 DU). The sample(s)was preserved to the appropriate pH in the laboratory. Method(s)6010D:The following samples were diluted due to the presence of an interferent. B-1 (5-10')(310-149954-1), B-2(15-20') (310-149954-2), B-3(12.5-15')(310-149954-3), B-4(12.5-15')(310-149954-4)and B-5(20-22.5')(310-149954-5). Elevated reporting limits(RLs)are provided. Method(s)7470A:The reference method requires samples to be preserved to a pH of<2. The following samples were received with insufficient preservation at a pH of>2: B-3(310-149954-9)and B-4(310-149954-10). The sample(s)was preserved to the appropriate pH in the laboratory. No additional analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described above or in the Definitions/Glossary page. General Chemistry No analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described in the Definitions/Glossary page. Organic Prep ethod(s)WI DRO PREP:The following sample was provided to the laboratory with a significantly different initial weight than that required the reference method: B-5(20-22.5')(310-149954-5). The method requires 25-70.5 g. The amount provided was below this range. TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 4 of 86 3/5/2019 Case Narrative Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 die Job ID: 310-149954-1 (Continued) Laboratory: TestAmerica Cedar Falls (Continued) No additional analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described above or in the Definitions/Glossary page. VOA Prep No analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described in the Definitions/Glossary page. TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 5 of 86 3/5/2019 Sample Summary Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Matrix Collected Received 310-149954-1 B-1(5-10') Soil 02/21/19 11:30 02/23/19 09:30 4 310-149954-2 B-2(15-20') Soil 02/21/19 12:20 02/23/19 09:30 310-149954-3 B-3(12.5-15') Soil 02/21/19 13:30 02/23/19 09:30 "" 310-149954-4 B-4(12.5-15') Soil 02/21/19 15:00 02/23/19 09:30 310-149954-5 B-5(20-22.5') Soil 02/21/19 16:20 02/23/19 09:30 310-149954-6 Trip Blank Soil 02/21/19 08:00 02/23/19 09:30 310-149954-7 Trip Blank Water 02/21/19 08:00 02/23/19 09:30 310-149954-8 B-2 Ground Water 02/21/19 12:40 02/23/19 09:30 310-149954-9 B-3 Ground Water 02/21/19 13:55 02/23/19 09:30 310-149954-10 B-4 Ground Water 02/21/19 15:30 02/23/19 09:30 310-149954-11 B-5 Ground Water 02/21/19 16:45 02/23/19 09:30 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 6 of 86 3/5/2019 Detection Summary i. Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-1 (5-10') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-1 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type Barium 123 1.77 mg/Kg 2 0 6010D Total/NA Chromium 15.7 1.77 mg/Kg 2 0 6010D Total/NA 0 Mercury 0.0323 0.0221 mg/Kg 1 0 7471B Total/NA Client Sample ID: B-2 (15-20') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-2 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type Ethylbenzene 0.745 0.137 mg/Kg 1 0 8260B Total/NA Naphthalene 0.610 0.343 mg/Kg 1 0 8260B Total/NA N-Propylbenzene 0.253 0.137 mg/Kg 1 0 8260B Total/NA Toluene 1.28 F1 0.137 mg/Kg 1 0 8260B Total/NA 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 2.19 Fl 0.137 mg/Kg 1 0 8260B Total/NA 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.567 0.137 mg/Kg 1 0 8260B Total/NA Xylenes,Total 4.53 Fl 0.206 mg/Kg 1 0 8260B Total/NA Anthracene 0.215 0.116 mg/Kg 10 0 8270D SIM Total/NA Benzo[a]anthracene 0.884 0.116 mg/Kg 10 0 8270D SIM Total/NA Benzo[a]pyrene 0.893 0.116 mg/Kg 10 0 8270D SIM Total/NA Benzo[b]fluoranthene 1.23 0.116 mg/Kg 10 0 8270D SIM Total/NA Benzo h,i a lene 0.655 0.116 mg/Kg 10 0 8270D SIM Total/NA [g. 1P rY 9 9 t.; Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.410 0.116 mg/Kg 10 0 8270D SIM Total/NA Chrysene 0.877 0.116 mg/Kg 10 0 8270D SIM Total/NA Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 0.157 0.116 mg/Kg 10 0 8270D SIM Total/NA Fluoranthene 1.91 0.116 mg/Kg 10 0 8270D SIM Total/NA Fluorene 0.116 0.116 mg/Kg 10 0 8270D SIM Total/NA Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 0.620 0.116 mg/Kg 10 0 8270D SIM Total/NA Phenanthrene 0.700 0.116 mg/Kg 10 0 8270D SIM Total/NA Pyrene 1.85 0.116 mg/Kg 10 0 8270D SIM Total/NA Diesel Range Organics(DRO) 185 7.32 mg/Kg 1 0 WI-DRO Silica Gel Cleanup Barium 104 1.83 mg/Kg 2 0 6010D Total/NA Chromium 40.9 1.83 mg/Kg 2 0 6010D Total/NA Lead 56.0 9.14 mg/Kg 2 0 6010D Total/NA Mercury 0.0645 0.0225 mg/Kg 1 0 7471B Total/NA Client Sample ID: B-3 (12.5-15') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-3 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 5.94 0.169 mg/Kg 1 0 8260B Total/NA Benzo[a]anthracene 0.244 0.137 mg/Kg 10 0 8270D SIM Total/NA Benzo[a]pyrene 0.234 0.137 mg/Kg 10 0 8270D SIM Total/NA Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.338 0.137 mg/Kg 10 0 8270D SIM Total/NA Benzo[g,h,i)perylene 0.184 0.137 mg/Kg 10 0 8270D SIM Total/NA Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.137 0.137 mg/Kg 10 0 8270D SIM Total/NA Chrysene 0.261 0.137 mg/Kg 10 0 8270D SIM Total/NA Fluoranthene 0.420 0.137 mg/Kg 10 0 8270D SIM Total/NA Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 0.168 0.137 mg/Kg 10 0 8270D SIM Total/NA Phenanthrene 0.195 0.137 mg/Kg 10 0 8270D SIM Total/NA Pyrene 0.374 0.137 mg/Kg 10 0 8270D SIM Total/NA PCB-1254 0.678 0.332 mg/Kg 5 0 8082A Total/NA Diesel Range Organics(DRO) 1790 87.3 mg/Kg 10 0 WI-DRO Silica Gel Cleanup This Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results. TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 7 of 86 3/5/2019 Detection Summary Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-3 (12.5-15') (Continued) Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-3 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type Barium 118 2.99 mg/Kg 3 0 6010D Total/NA Chromium 18.9 2.99 mg/Kg 3 0 6010D Total/NA Ell Lead 224 15.0 mg/Kg 3 0 6010D Total/NA Mercury 0.152 0.0226 mg/Kg 1 0 74710 Total/NA Client Sample ID: B-4 (12.5-15') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-4 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.187 0.143 mg/Kg 10 0 8270D SIM Total/NA Fluoranthene 0.338 0.143 mg/Kg 10 0 8270D SIM Total/NA Phenanthrene 0.280 0.143 mg/Kg 10 0 8270D SIM Total/NA Pyrene 0.262 0.143 mg/Kg 10 0 8270D SIM Total/NA PCB-1254 0.246 0.0707 mg/Kg 1 0 8082A Total/NA Diesel Range Organics(DRO) 20.4 9.24 mg/Kg 1 0 WI-DRO Silica Gel Cleanup Barium 222 2.42 mg/Kg 2 0 6010D Total/NA Chromium 23.7 2.42 mg/Kg 2 0 6010D Total/NA Lead 190 12.1 mg/Kg 2 0 6010D Total/NA Mercury 0.125 0.0269 mg/Kg 1 0 7471B Total/NA Client Sample ID: B-5(20-22.5') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-5 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type n-Butylbenzene 0.890 0.374 mg/Kg 1 0 82600 Total/NA sec-Butylbenzene 0.445 0.374 mg/Kg 1 0 8260B Total/NA 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.623 0.374 mg/Kg 1 0 8260B Total/NA 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.886 0.374 mg/Kg 1 0 8260B Total/NA Ethylbenzene 0.892 0.374 mg/Kg 1 0 8260B Total/NA p-lsopropyltoluene 0.488 0.374 mg/Kg 1 0 8260B Total/NA Naphthalene 2.74 0.935 mg/Kg 1 0 8260B Total/NA N-Propylbenzene 0.696 0.374 mg/Kg 1 0 8260B Total/NA 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 5.29 0.374 mg/Kg 1 0 8260B Total/NA 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 1.87 0.374 mg/Kg 1 0 8260B Total/NA Xylenes,Total 3.60 0.561 mg/Kg 1 0 8260B Total/NA 2-Methylnaphthalene 0.895 0.219 mg/Kg 10 0 8270D SIM Total/NA Naphthalene 1.56 0.219 mg/Kg 10 0 82700 SIM Total/NA Phenanthrene 0.321 0.219 mg/Kg 10 0 8270D SIM Total/NA Wisconsin GRO 42.2 25.1 mg/Kg 1 0 WI-GRO Total/NA PCB-1254 0.261 0.105 mg/Kg 1 0 8082A Total/NA Polychlorinated biphenyls,Total 0.208 0.105 mg/Kg 1 0 8082A Total/NA Diesel Range Organics(DRO) 577 32.5 mg/Kg 2 0 WI-DRO Silica Gel Cleanup Barium 141 3.94 mg/Kg 2 0 6010D Total/NA Chromium 42.4 3.94 mg/Kg 2 0 6010D Total/NA Lead 184 19.7 mg/Kg 2 0 6010D Total/NA Mercury 2.96 0.402 mg/Kg 10 0 7471B Total/NA Client Sample ID: Trip Blank Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-6 No Detections. his Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results. TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 8 of 86 3/5/2019 Detection Summary 1'' Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID:310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: Trip Blank Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-7 No Detections. Client Sample ID: B-2 Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-8 0 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type Diethyl ether 16.2 2.00 ug/L 1 8260B Total/NA Arsenic 0.00898 0.00200 mg/L 1 6020B Dissolved Barium 0.893 0.00200 mg/L 1 6020B Dissolved Client Sample ID: B-3 Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-9 ,. Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type Acetone 11.9 10.0 ug/L 1 8260B Total/NA Benzene 3.24 0.500 ug/L 1 8260B Total/NA n-Butylbenzene 1.09 1.00 ug/L 1 8260B Total/NA Chlorobenzene 3.04 1.00 ug/L 1 8260B Total/NA 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 4.06 1.00 ug/L 1 8260B Total/NA 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 2.18 1.00 ug/L 1 8260B Total/NA 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 6.54 1.00 ug/L 1 8260B Total/NA Ethylbenzene 3.98 1.00 ug/L 1 8260B Total/NA lsopropylbenzene 1.51 1.00 ug/L 1 8260B Total/NA p-Isopropyltoluene 5.33 1.00 ug/L 1 8260B Total/NA Naphthalene 6.29 5.00 ug/L 1 8260B Total/NA N-Propylbenzene 2.16 1.00 ug/L 1 8260B Total/NA Toluene 2.08 1.00 ug/L 1 8260B Total/NA 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 17.1 1.00 ug/L 1 8260B Total/NA 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 5.73 1.00 ug/L 1 8260B Total/NA Xylenes,Total 20.1 3.00 ug/L 1 8260B Total/NA Acenaphthene 2.94 1.06 ug/L 10 8270D SIM Total/NA Anthracene 1.69 1.06 ug/L 10 8270D SIM Total/NA Benzo[a]anthracene 2.67 1.06 ug/L 10 8270D SIM Total/NA Benzo[a]pyrene 2.08 1.06 ug/L 10 8270D SIM Total/NA Benzo[b]fiuoranthene 2.91 1.06 ug/L 10 8270D SIM Total/NA Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 1.25 1.06 ug/L 10 8270D SIM Total/NA Benzo[k]fluoranthene 1.27 1.06 ug/L 10 8270D SIM Total/NA Chrysene 3.94 1.06 ug/L 10 8270D SIM Total/NA Fluoranthene 7.79 1.06 ug/L 10 8270D SIM Total/NA Fluorene 2.34 1.06 ug/L 10 8270D SIM Total/NA Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 1.35 1.06 ug/L 10 8270D SIM Total/NA Naphthalene 5.64 5.32 ug/L 10 8270D SIM Total/NA Phenanthrene 6.18 1.06 ug/L 10 8270D SIM Total/NA Pyrene 5.85 1.06 ug/L 10 8270D SIM Total/NA Diesel Range Organics(DRO) 0.581 * 0.106 mg/L 1 WI-DRO Silica Gel Cleanup Barium 0.784 0.00200 mg/L 1 6020B Dissolved Client Sample ID: B-4 Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-10 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type Diesel Range Organics(DRO) 0.204 * 0.108 mg/L 1 WI-DRO Silica Gel Cleanup Arsenic 0.00253 0.00200 mg/L 1 6020B Dissolved This Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results. TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 9 of 86 3/5/2019 Detection Summary Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-4 (Continued) Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-10 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Di!Fac D Method Prep Type ' ;, Barium 0.207 0.00200 mg/L 1 60208 Dissolved = : Client Sample ID: B-5 Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-11 El Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type Diesel Range Organics(DRO) 0.175 * 0.105 mg/L 1 WI-DRO Silica Gel Cleanup Barium 0.484 0.00200 mg/L 1 6020B Dissolved Lead 0.000580 0.000500 mg/L 1 6020B Dissolved rit' w,,, ....,_, his Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results. TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 10 of 86 3/5/2019 Client Sample Results Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID:310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-1 (5-10') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-1 Date Collected: 02/21/19 11:30 Matrix:Soil Date Received:02/23/19 09:30 Percent Solids:84.9 Method: 8260B-Volatile Organic Compounds(GC/MS) 4 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac _ Acetone <0.693 0.693 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 c Allyl chloride <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 6 Benzene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Bromobenzene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Bromochloromethane <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Bromodichloromethane <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Bromoform <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Bromomethane <0.693 0.693 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 2-Butanone(MEK) <0.346 0.346 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 n-Butylbenzene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 sec-Butylbenzene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 tert-Butylbenzene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Carbon tetrachloride <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Chlorobenzene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Chlorodibromomethane <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Dichlorofluoromethane <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Chloroethane <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Chloroform <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Chloromethane <0.346 0.346 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 4-Chlorotoluene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 2-Chlorotoluene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Dibromomethane <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 1,2-Dichloroethane <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 1,1-Dichloroethane <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 1,1-Dichloroethene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 1,2-Dichloropropane <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 1,3-Dichloropropane <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 2,2-Dichloropropane <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 1,1-Dichloropropene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg a 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Diethyl ether <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 4 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Ethylbenzene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Hexachlorobutadiene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Isopropylbenzene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg G 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 p-lsopropyltoluene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Methylene Chloride <0.346 0.346 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Methyl tert-butyl ether <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Naphthalene <0.346 0.346 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 N-Propylbenzene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 11 of 86 3/5/2019 Client Sample Results , ; Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-1 (5-10') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-1 Date Collected: 02/21/19 11:30 Matrix:Soil Date Received: 02/23/19 09:30 Percent Solids:84.9 Method:8260B-Volatile Organic Compounds(GC/MS)(Continued) f, Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac ,-S Styrene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg # 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 c 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg # 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 6 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Tetrachloroethene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 - Tetrahydrofuran <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg # 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Toluene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Trichloroethene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Trichlorofluoromethane <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Vinyl chloride <0.139 0.139 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Xylenes,Total <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 98 80_120 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) 93 80.120 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 LToluene-d8(Surr) 98 80..120 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:22 1 Method: 8270D SIM -Semivolatile Organic Compound(GC/MS SIM LL) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Acenaphthene <0.0113 0.0113 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:26 1 Acenaphthylene <0.0113 0.0113 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:26 1 Anthracene <0.0113 0.0113 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:26 1 Benzo[a]anthracene <0.0113 0.0113 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:26 1 Benzo[a]pyrene <0.0113 0.0113 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:26 1 Benzo[b]fluoranthene <0.0113 0.0113 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:26 1 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene <0.0113 0.0113 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:26 1 Benzo[k]fluoranthene <0.0113 0.0113 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:26 1 Chrysene <0.0113 0.0113 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:26 1 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene <0.0113 0.0113 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:26 1 Fluoranthene <0.0113 0.0113 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:26 1 Fluorene <0.0113 0.0113 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:26 1 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene <0.0113 0.0113 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:26 1 2-Methylnaphthalene <0.0113 0.0113 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:26 1 Naphthalene <0.0113 0.0113 mg/Kg # 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:26 1 Phenanthrene <0.0113 0.0113 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:26 1 Pyrene <0.0113 0.0113 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:26 1 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 2-Fluorobiphenyl(Surr) 63 28_110 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:26 1 Nitrobenzene-d5(Surr) 71 22.110 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:26 1 Terphenyl-d14(Surr) 63 26.110 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:26 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 12 of 86 3/5/2019 Client Sample Results Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-1 (5-10') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-1 Date Collected:02/21/19 11:30 Matrix:Soil Date Received:02/23/19 09:30 Percent Solids:84.9 Method:WI-GRO-Wisconsin -Gasoline Range Organics(GC) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Wisconsin GRO <12.1 12.1 mg/Kg # 02/25/19 10:08 02/25/19 14:45 1 6 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 95 80-120 02/25/19 10:08 02/25/19 14:45 1 Method:8082A-Polychlorinated Biphenyls(PCBs)by Gas Chromatography Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac PCB-1016 <0.0585 * 0.0585 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 16:08 1 PCB-1221 <0.0585 0.0585 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 16:08 1 PCB-1232 <0.0585 0.0585 mg/Kg 4 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 16:08 1 P00-1242 <0.0585 0.0585 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 16:08 1 P00-1248 <0.0585 0.0585 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 16:08 1 P00-1254 <0.0585 0.0585 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 16:08 1 PCB-1260 <0.0585 0.0585 mg/Kg 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 16:08 1 PCB-1268 <0.0585 0.0585 mg/Kg 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 16:08 1 Polychlorinated biphenyls,Total <0.0585 0.0585 mg/Kg a 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 16:08 1 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed DII Fac .,r ry', DCB Decachlorobiphenyl(Surr) 63 10-110 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 16:08 1 Tetrachloro-m-xylene 63 10-110 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 16:08 1 Method:WI-DRO-Wisconsin -Diesel Range Organics(GC)-Silica Gel Cleanup Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Diesel Range Organics(DRO) <5.52 5.52 mg/Kg 0 02/25/19 11:56 02/27/19 12:27 1 rMethod: 6010D-Metals(ICP) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Arsenic <7.10 7.10 mg/Kg 4, 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:35 2 Barium 123 1.77 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:35 2 Cadmium <1.77 1.77 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:35 2 Chromium 15.7 1.77 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18.35 2 Lead <8.87 8.87 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:35 2 Selenium <13.3 13.3 mg/Kg 4 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:35 2 Silver <1.77 1.77 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:35 2 Method:7471B-Mercury(CVAA) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Mercury 0.0323 0.0221 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 10:00 02/27/19 12:35 1 General Chemistry Analyte Result Qualifier RL RL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Percent Moisture 15.1 0.1 % 02/25/19 11:27 1 Percent Solids 84.9 0.1 % 02/25/19 11:27 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 13 of 86 3/5/2019 Client Sample Results - Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-2 (15-20') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-2 Date Collected:02/21/19 12:20 Matrix: Soil Date Received:02/23/19 09:30 Percent Solids: 83.5 Method:8260B-Volatile Organic Compounds(GC/MS) :-M .4 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Acetone <0.686 0.686 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Allyl chloride <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 6 Benzene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Bromobenzene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Bromochloromethane <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Bromodichloromethane <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Bromoform <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Bromomethane <0.686 0.686 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 2-Butanone(MEK) <0.343 0.343 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 n-Butylbenzene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 sec-Butylbenzene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 tert-Butylbenzene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Carbon tetrachloride <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Chlorobenzene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Chlorodibromomethane <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Dichlorofluoromethane <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg 4 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Chloroethane <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 e f y Chloroform <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Chloromethane <0.343 0.343 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 4-Chlorotoluene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 2-Chlorotoluene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Dibromomethane <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg 4 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 1,2-Dichloroethane <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 1,1-Dichloroethane <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 1,1-Dichloroethene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 1,2-Dichloropropane <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 1,3-Dichloropropane <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 2,2-Dichloropropane <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 1,1-Dichloropropene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Diethyl ether <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Ethylbenzene 0.745 0.137 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Hexachlorobutadiene <0.137 Fl 0.137 mg/Kg # 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 lsopropylbenzene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 p-lsopropyltoluene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Methylene Chloride <0.343 0.343 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Methyl tert-butyl ether <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Naphthalene 0.610 0.343 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 N-Propylbenzene 0.253 0.137 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 14 of 86 3/5/2019 Client Sample Results Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-2 (15-20') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-2 Date Collected:02/21/19 12:20 Matrix:Soil Date Received:02/23/19 09:30 Percent Solids:83.5 Method: 8260B-Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)(Continued) `*;- Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared AnalyzedDil Fac r; a Styrene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg < 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 6 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg 4 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Tetrachloroethene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Tetrahydrofuran <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg 4 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Toluene 1.28 Fl 0.137 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Trichloroethene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Trichlorofluoromethane <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 2.19 Fl 0.137 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.567 0.137 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Vinyl chloride <0 137 0.137 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Xylenes,Total 4.53 Fl 0.206 mg/Kg 3 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 98 80_120 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) 96 80-120 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Toluene-d8(Surr) 98 80_120 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 10:46 1 Method:8270D SIM-Semivolatile Organic Compound(GC/MS SIM LL) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Acenaphthene <0.116 0.116 mg/Kg 4 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:45 10 Acenaphthylene <0.116 0.116 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:45 10 Anthracene 0.215 0.116 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:45 10 Benzo[a]anthracene 0.884 0.116 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:45 10 Benzo[a]pyrene 0.893 0.116 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:45 10 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 1.23 0.116 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:45 10 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 0.655 0.116 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:45 10 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.410 0.116 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:45 10 Chrysene 0.877 0.116 mg/Kg 3 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:45 10 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 0.157 0.116 mg/Kg 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:45 10 Fluoranthene 1.91 0.116 mg/Kg 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:45 10 Fluorene 0.116 0.116 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:45 10 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 0.620 0.116 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:45 10 2-Methylnaphthalene <0.116 0.116 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:45 10 Naphthalene <0.116 0.116 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:45 10 Phenanthrene 0.700 0.116 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:45 10 Pyrene 1.85 0.116 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:45 10 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 2-Fluorobiphenyl(Surr) 59 28.110 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:45 10 Nitrobenzene-d5(Surr) 104 22-110 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:45 10 Terphenyl-d14(Surr) 66 26-110 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 15:45 10 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 15 of 86 3/5/2019 Client Sample Results Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-2 (15-20') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-2 Date Collected: 02/21/19 12:20 Matrix:Soil Date Received: 02/23/19 09:30 Percent Solids:83.5 Method:WI-GRO-Wisconsin-Gasoline Range Organics(GC) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Wisconsin GRO <11.8 11.8 mg/Kg +7 02/25/19 10:08 02/25/19 15:16 1 6 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 101 80.120 02/25/19 10:08 02/25/19 15:16 1 Method:8082A-Polychlorinated Biphenyls(PCBs)by Gas Chromatography Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac , PCB-1016 <2.94 ' 2.94 mg/Kg # 02/26/19 14:18 03/01/19 15:11 50 PCB-1221 <2.94 2.94 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:18 03/01/19 15:11 50 PCB-1232 <2.94 2.94 mg/Kg # 02/26/19 14:18 03/01/1915:11 50 PCB-1242 <2.94 2.94 mg/Kg # 02/26/19 14:18 03/01/19 15:11 50 PCB-1248 <2.94 2.94 mg/Kg # 02/26/19 14:18 03/01/19 15:11 50 PCB-1254 <0.0589 0.0589 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 16:19 1 PCB-1260 <0.0589 * 0.0589 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 16:19 1 PCB-1268 <0.0589 0.0589 mg/Kg d 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 16:19 1 Polychlorinated biphenyls,Total <2.94 2.94 mg/Kg 4 02/26/19 14:18 03/01/19 15:11 50 k Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac ., DCB Decachlorobiphenyl(Sun-) 59 10-110 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 16:19 1 Tetrachloro-m-xylene 171 X 10_110 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 16:19 1 r Method:WI-DRO-Wisconsin -Diesel Range Organics(GC)-Silica Gel Cleanup Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac LDiesel Range Organics(DRO) 185 7.32 mg/Kg 0 02/25/19 11:56 02/27/19 12:40 1 Method: 6010D-Metals(ICP) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Arsenic <7.31 7.31 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:37 2 Barium 104 1.83 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:37 2 Cadmium <1.83 1.83 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:37 2 Chromium 40.9 1.83 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:37 2 Lead 56.0 9.14 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:37 2 Selenium <13.7 13.7 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:37 2 Silver <1.83 1.83 mg/Kg # 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:37 2 Method: 7471B-Mercury(CVAA) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Mercury 0.0645 0.0225 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 08:52 02/27/19 12:38 1 General Chemistry Analyte Result Qualifier RL RL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Percent Moisture 16.5 0.1 % 02/25/19 11:27 1 Percent Solids 83.5 0.1 % 02/25/19 11:27 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 16 of 86 3/5/2019 Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-3 (12.5-15') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-3 Date Collected:02/21/19 13:30 Matrix:Soil Date Received:02/23/19 09:30 Percent Solids:72.1 Method: 8260B-Volatile Organic Compounds(GC/MS) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac i Acetone <0.844 0.844 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 c Allyl chloride <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg r 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 6 Benzene <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg P 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 Bromobenzene <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 Bromochloromethane <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 Bromodichloromethane <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 Bromoform <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 Bromomethane <0.844 0.844 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 2-Butanone(MEK) <0.422 0.422 mg/Kg 4 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 n-Butylbenzene <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 sec-Butylbenzene <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 tert-Butylbenzene <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 Carbon tetrachloride <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 Chlorobenzene <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 Chlorodibromomethane <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 Dichlorofluoromethane <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 Chloroethane <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 Chloroform <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 Chloromethane <0.422 0.422 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 4-Chlorotoluene <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 2-Chlorotoluene <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 Dibromomethane <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 5.94 0.169 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 1,2-Dichloroethane <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 1,1-Dichloroethane <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 1,1-Dichloroethene <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 1,2-Dichloropropane <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 1,3-Dichloropropane <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 2,2-Dichloropropane <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 1,1-Dichloropropene <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 Diethyl ether <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg a 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 Ethylbenzene <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 Hexachlorobutadiene <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 lsopropylbenzene <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 p-lsopropyltoluene <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 Methylene Chloride <0.422 0.422 mg/Kg 4 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 Methyl tert-butyl ether <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 Naphthalene <0.422 0.422 mg/Kg 4 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 N-Propylbenzene <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 17 of 86 3/5/2019 Client Sample Results Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 :Tient Sample ID: B-3 (12.5-15') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-3 Date Collected: 02/21/19 13:30 Matrix:Soil Date Received:02/23/19 09:30 Percent Solids:72.1 r ,. Method: 8260B-Volatile Organic Compounds(GC/MS)(Continued) ., Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Styrene <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 c 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 6 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg * 02/27/1905:39 02/27/1911:10 1 Tetrachloroethene <0 169 0.169 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 Tetrahydrofuran <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg r- 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 Toluene <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg # 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg -0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg # 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 Trichloroethene <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 Trichlorofluoromethane <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 1,2,3-Tnchloropropane <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg R 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 ;.'/ ;t Vinyl chloride <0.169 0.169 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 Xylenes,Total <0.253 0.253 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 96 80-120 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) 92 80-120 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 Toluene-d8(Surr) 98 80-120 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:10 1 L_ Method:8270D SIM-Semivolatile Organic Compound(GC/MS SIM LL) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Acenaphthene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg # 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:21 10 Acenaphthylene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg # 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:21 10 Anthracene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg # 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:21 10 Benzo[a]anthracene 0.244 0.137 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:21 10 Benzo[a]pyrene 0.234 0.137 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:21 10 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.338 0.137 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:21 10 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 0.184 0.137 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:21 10 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.137 0.137 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:21 10 Chrysene 0.261 0.137 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:21 10 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:21 10 Fluoranthene 0.420 0.137 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:21 10 Fluorene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:21 10 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 0.168 0.137 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:21 10 2-Methylnaphthalene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:21 10 Naphthalene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg 0 02/26/1914:11 02/27/19 16:21 10 Phenanthrene 0.195 0.137 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:21 10 Pyrene 0.374 0.137 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:21 10 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 2-Fluorobiphenyl(Surr) 60 28-110 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:21 10 Nitrobenzene-d5(Surr) 75 22-110 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:21 10 Terphenyl-d14(Surr) 61 26-110 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:21 10 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 18 of 86 3/5/2019 Client Sample Results Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-3 (12.5-15') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-3 Date Collected:02/21/19 13:30 Matrix:Soil Date Received:02/23/19 09:30 Percent Solids:72.1 Method:WI-GRO-Wisconsin-Gasoline Range Organics(GC) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac .' a3 Wisconsin GRO <13.0 13.0 mg/Kg * 02/25/19 10:08 02/25/19 15:47 1 6 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 97 80-120 02/25/19 10:08 02/25/19 15:47 1 Method: 8082A-Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)by Gas Chromatography Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac PCB-1016 <6.63 * 6.63 mg/Kg -0 02/26/1914:18 03/01/19 15:21 100 PCB-1221 <6.63 6.63 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:18 03/01/19 15:21 100 PCB-1232 <6.63 6.63 mg/Kg 0 02/26/1914:18 03/01/19 15:21 100 PCB-1242 <6.63 6.63 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:18 03/01/19 15:21 100 PCB-1248 <6.63 6.63 mg/Kg 02/26/19 14:18 03/01/19 15:21 100 PCB-1254 0.678 0.332 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:18 03/01/19 17:23 5 PCB-1260 <0.0663 * 0.0663 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 16:30 1 PCB-1268 <0.0663 0.0663 mg/Kg 4 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 16:30 1 Polychlorinated biphenyls,Total <6.63 6.63 mg/Kg 4 02/26/19 14:18 03/01/19 15:21 100 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac ,,,k, DCB Decachlorobiphenyl(Sun) 49 10-110 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 16:30 1 Tetrachloro-m-xylene 275 X 10-110 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 16:30 1 Method:WI-DRO-Wisconsin -Diesel Range Organics(GC)-Silica Gel Cleanup Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Diesel Range Organics(DRO) 1790 87.3 mg/Kg 02/25/19 11:56 02/27/19 12:52 10 Method:6010D-Metals(ICP) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Arsenic <12.0 12.0 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:39 3 Barium 118 2.99 mg/Kg 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:39 3 Cadmium <2.99 2.99 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:39 3 Chromium 18.9 2.99 mg/Kg # 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:39 3 Lead 224 15.0 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:39 3 Selenium <22.4 22.4 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:39 3 Silver <2.99 2.99 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:39 3 Method: 7471B-Mercury(CVAA) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Mercury 0.152 0.0226 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 08:52 02/27/19 12:44 1 General Chemistry Analyte Result Qualifier RL RL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Percent Moisture 27.9 0.1 % 02/25/19 11:27 1 Percent Solids 72.1 0.1 % 02/25/19 11:27 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 19 of 86 3/5/2019 Client Sample Results Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-4 (12.5-15') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-4 Date Collected: 02/21/19 15:00 Matrix:Soil Date Received:02/23/19 09:30 Percent Solids:69.7 Method:8260B-Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 8 Acetone <0.950 0.950 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Allyl chloride <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 6 Benzene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Bromobenzene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Bromochloromethane <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Bromodichloromethane <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Bromoform <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Bromomethane <0.950 0.950 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 2-Butanone(MEK) <0.475 0.475 mg/Kg # 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 n-Butylbenzene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 sec-Butylbenzene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 tert-Butylbenzene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Carbon tetrachloride <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Chlorobenzene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Chlorodibromomethane <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Dichlorofluoromethane <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg a 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Chloroethane <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Chloroform <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Chloromethane <0.475 0.475 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 4-Chlorotoluene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 2-Chlorotoluene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Dibromomethane <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 1,2-Dichloroethane <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 1,1-Dichloroethane <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 1,1-Dichloroethene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg # 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 1,2-Dichloropropane <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 1,3-Dichloropropane <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 2,2-Dichloropropane <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 1,1-Dichloropropene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Diethyl ether <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Ethylbenzene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Hexachlorobutadiene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Isopropylbenzene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 p-lsopropyltoluene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Methylene Chloride <0.475 0.475 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Methyl tert-butyl ether <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Naphthalene <0.475 0.475 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 N-Propylbenzene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 20 of 86 3/5/2019 Client Sample Results i ,; Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-4 (12.5-15') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-4 Date Collected:02/21/19 15:00 Matrix:Soil Date Received:02/23/19 09:30 Percent Solids:69.7 Method: 8260B-Volatile Organic Compounds(GC/MS)(Continued) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 1= Styrene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg a 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Tetrachloroethene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Tetrahydrofuran <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Toluene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg # 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Trichloroethene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Trichlorofluoromethane <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg * 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Vinyl chloride <0.190 0.190 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Xylenes,Total <0.285 0.285 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dii Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 98 80-120 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) 95 80_120 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Toluene-d8(Surr) 99 80_120 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:34 1 Method:8270D SIM -Semivolatile Organic Compound(GC/MS SIM LL) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Acenaphthene <0.143 0.143 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:58 10 Acenaphthylene <0.143 0.143 mg/Kg # 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:58 10 Anthracene <0.143 0.143 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:58 10 Benzo[a]anthracene <0.143 0.143 mg/Kg # 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:58 10 Benzo[a]pyrene <0.143 0.143 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:58 10 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.187 0.143 mg/Kg < 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:58 10 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene <0.143 0.143 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:58 10 Benzo[k]fluoranthene <0.143 0.143 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/1916:58 10 Chrysene <0.143 0.143 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/1916:58 10 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene <0.143 0.143 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:58 10 Fluoranthene 0.338 0.143 mg/Kg 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:58 10 Fluorene <0.143 0.143 mg/Kg 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:58 10 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene <0.143 0.143 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:58 10 2-Methylnaphthalene <0.143 0.143 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:58 10 Naphthalene <0.143 0.143 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:58 10 Phenanthrene 0.280 0.143 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:58 10 Pyrene 0.262 0.143 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:58 10 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 2-Fluorobiphenyl(Surr) 67 28-110 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:58 10 Nitrobenzene-d5(Surr) 90 22-110 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:58 10 Terphenyl-d14(Surr) 63 26-110 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 16:58 10 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 21 of 86 3/5/2019 Client Sample Results Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 ;tient Sample ID: B-4 (12.5-15') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-4 Date Collected: 02/21/19 15:00 Matrix:Soil Date Received:02/23/19 09:30 Percent Solids: 69.7 Method:WI-GRO-Wisconsin -Gasoline Range Organics(GC) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Wisconsin GRO <14.7 14.7 mg/Kg 0 02/25/19 10:08 02/25/19 16:25 1 6 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 87 80.120 02/25/19 10:08 02/25/19 16:25 1 Method: 8082A-Polychlorinated Biphenyls(PCBs) by Gas Chromatography Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac PCB-1016 <1.77 * 1.77 mg/Kg # 02/26/19 14:18 03/01/19 15:43 25 PCB-1221 <1.77 1.77 mg/Kg * 02/26/1914:18 03/01/1915:43 25 PCB-1232 <1.77 1.77 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:18 03/01/19 15:43 25 PCB-1242 <1.77 1.77 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:18 03/01/19 15:43 25 PCB-1248 <1.77 1.77 mg/Kg d 02/26/19 14:18 03/01/19 15:43 25 PCB-1254 0.246 0.0707 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:18 03/01/19 15:54 1 PCB-1260 <0.0707 * 0.0707 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 16:41 1 PCB-1268 <0.0707 0.0707 mg/Kg 4 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 16:41 1 Polychlorinated biphenyls,Total <1.77 1.77 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:18 03/01/19 15:43 25 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac , DCB Decachlorobiphenyl(Surr) 59 10-110 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 16:41 1 Tetrachloro-m-xylene 88 10_110 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 16:41 1 Method:WI-DRO-Wisconsin -Diesel Range Organics(GC)-Silica Gel Cleanup Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac L Diesel Range Organics(DRO) 20.4 9.24 mg/Kg * 02/25/19 11:56 02/27/19 13:05 1 Method: 6010D-Metals(ICP) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Arsenic <9.67 9.67 mg/Kg 8 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:40 2 Barium 222 2.42 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:40 2 Cadmium <2.42 2.42 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:40 2 Chromium 23.7 2.42 mg/Kg # 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:40 2 Lead 190 12.1 mg/Kg # 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:40 2 Selenium <18.1 18.1 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:40 2 Silver <2.42 2.42 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:40 2 Method:7471B-Mercury(CVAA) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Mercury 0.125 0.0269 mg/Kg * 02/26/19 08:52 02/27/19 12:46 1 General Chemistry Analyte Result Qualifier RL RL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Percent Moisture 30.3 0.1 % 02/25/19 11:27 1 Percent Solids 69.7 0.1 % 02/25/19 11:27 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 22 of 86 3/5/2019 Client Sample Results Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID:310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-5 (20-22.5') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-5 Date Collected:02/21/19 16:20 Matrix:Soil Date Received:02/23/19 09:30 Percent Solids:44.9 Method:8260B-Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) , .1-, Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac - -A: r Acetone <1.87 1.87 mg/Kg # 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 c Allyl chloride <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 6 Benzene <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Bromobenzene <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Bromochloromethane <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Bromodichloromethane <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Bromoform <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Bromomethane <1.87 1.87 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 2-Butanone(MEK) <0.935 0.935 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 n-Butylbenzene 0.890 0.374 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 sec-Butylbenzene 0.445 0.374 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 tert-Butylbenzene <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Carbon tetrachloride <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Chlorobenzene <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Chlorodibromomethane <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Dichlorofluoromethane <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 4 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 ,4,;;:, Chloroethane <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Chloroform <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Chloromethane <0.935 0.935 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 4-Chlorotoluene <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 2-Chlorotoluene <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Dibromomethane <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.623 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.886 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05.39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 1,2-Dichloroethane <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 1,1-Dichloroethane <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 4 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 1,1-Dichloroethene <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 1,2-Dichloropropane <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 1,3-Dichloropropane <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 4 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 2,2-Dichloropropane <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 1,1-Dichloropropene <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 4 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Diethyl ether <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Ethylbenzene 0.892 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Hexachlorobutadiene <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Isopropylbenzene <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 p-Isopropyltoluene 0.488 0.374 mg/Kg C 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Methylene Chloride <0.935 0.935 mg/Kg 4 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Methyl tert-butyl ether <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 4 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Naphthalene 2.74 0.935 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 N-Propylbenzene 0.696 0.374 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 23 of 86 3/5/2019 Client Sample ResultsPPE Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 ;Tient Sample ID: B-5 (20-22.5') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-5 Date Collected: 02/21/19 16:20 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 02/23/19 09:30 Percent Solids:44.9 Method: 8260B-Volatile Organic Compounds(GC/MS)(Continued) ) ' Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac '' Styrene <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 c 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg # 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 6 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg # 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Tetrachloroethene <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg # 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Tetrahydrofuran <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Toluene <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg # 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 4 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Trichloroethene <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg ' 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Trichlorofluoromethane <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 5.29 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 1.87 0.374 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 r 4 f Vinyl chloride <0.374 0.374 mg/Kg # 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Xylenes,Total 3.60 0.561 mg/Kg 0 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed DiI Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 101 80-120 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) 93 80_120 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Toluene-d8(Surr) 98 80.120 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 11:59 1 Method:8270D SIM-Semivolatile Organic Compound(GC/MS SIM LL) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Oil Fac Acenaphthene <0.219 0.219 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 17:35 10 Acenaphthylene <0.219 0.219 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 17:35 10 Anthracene <0.219 0.219 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 17:35 10 Benzo[a]anthracene <0.219 0.219 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 17:35 10 Benzo[a]pyrene <0.219 0.219 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 17:35 10 Benzo[b]fluoranthene <0.219 0.219 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 17:35 10 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene <0.219 0.219 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 17:35 10 Benzo[k]Fluoranthene <0.219 0.219 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 17:35 10 Chrysene <0.219 0.219 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 17:35 10 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene <0.219 0.219 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 17:35 10 Fluoranthene <0.219 0.219 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 17:35 10 Fluorene <0.219 0.219 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 17:35 10 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene <0.219 0.219 mg/Kg # 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 17:35 10 2-Methylnaphthalene 0.895 0.219 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 17:35 10 Naphthalene 1.56 0.219 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 17:35 10 Phenanthrene 0.321 0.219 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 17:35 10 Pyrene <0.219 0.219 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 17:35 10 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dii Fac 2-Fluorobiphenyl(Surr) 50 28-110 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 17:35 10 Nitrobenzene-d5(Surr) 119 X 22-110 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 17:35 10 Terphenyl-d14(Surr) 46 26-110 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 17:35 10 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 24 of 86 3/5/2019 Client Sample Results Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-5 (20-22.5') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-5 Date Collected:02/21/19 16:20 Matrix: Soil Date Received:02/23/19 09:30 Percent Solids:44.9 Method:WI-GRO-Wisconsin-Gasoline Range Organics(GC) `" Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac £ Wisconsin GRO 42.2 25.1 mg/Kg 02/25/19 10:08 02/25/19 16:56 1 6 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 119 80-120 02/25/19 10:08 02/25/19 16:56 1 Method:8082A-Polychlorinated Biphenyls(PCBs) by Gas Chromatography Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac PCB-1016 <10.5 * 10.5 mg/Kg * 02/26/1914:18 03/01/19 16:05 100 PCB-1221 <10.5 10.5 mg/Kg 0 02/26/1914:18 03/01/1916:05 100 PCB-1232 <10.5 10.5 mg/Kg a 02/26/19 14:18 03/01/19 16:05 100 PCB-1242 <10.5 10.5 mg/Kg 02/26/19 14:18 03/01/19 16:05 100 PCB-1248 <10.5 10.5 mg/Kg 02/26/19 14:18 03/01/19 16:05 100 PCB-1254 0.261 0.105 mg/Kg -0 02/26/19 14:18 03/01/19 16:15 1 PCB-1260 <0.105 0.105 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 16:51 1 PCB-1268 <0.105 0.105 mg/Kg 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 16:51 1 Polychlorinated biphenyls,Total 0.208 0.105 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 16:51 1 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac i DCB Decachlorobiphenyl(Surr) 43 10-110 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 16:51 1 Tetrachloro-m-xylene 246 X 10.110 02/26/1914:18 02/28/19 16:51 1 Method:WI-DRO-Wisconsin -Diesel Range Organics(GC)-Silica Gel Cleanup Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Diesel Range Organics(DRO) 577 32.5 mg/Kg 0 02/25/19 11:56 02/27/19 13:17 2 Method: 6010D-Metals(ICP) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Arsenic <15.8 15.8 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:42 2 Barium 141 3.94 mg/Kg 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:42 2 Cadmium <3.94 3.94 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:42 2 Chromium 42.4 3.94 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:42 2 Lead 184 19.7 mg/Kg 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:42 2 Selenium <29.5 29.5 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:42 2 Silver <3.94 3.94 mg/Kg 0 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 18:42 2 Method: 7471B-Mercury(CVAA) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Mercury 2.96 0.402 mg/Kg t 02/26/19 08:52 02/27/19 14:19 10 General Chemistry Analyte Result Qualifier RL RL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Percent Moisture 55.1 a.1 % 02/25/19 11:27 1 Percent Solids 44.9 0.1 % 02/25/19 11:27 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 25 of 86 3/5/2019 Client Sample Results Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID:310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 ;tient Sample ID: Trip Blank Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-6 Date Collected: 02/21/19 08:00 Matrix: Soil Date Received:02/23/19 09:30 Method: 8260B-Volatile Organic Compounds(GC/MS) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac i Acetone <0.500 0.500 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Allyl chloride <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 6 Benzene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Bromobenzene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 ,'. Bromochloromethane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Bromodichloromethane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Bromoform <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Bromomethane <0.500 0.500 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 2-Butanone(MEK) <0.250 0.250 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 n-Butylbenzene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 sec-Butylbenzene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 tert-Butylbenzene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Carbon tetrachloride <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Chlorobenzene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Chlorodibromomethane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Dichlorofluoromethane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Chloroethane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Chloroform <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Chloromethane <0.250 0.250 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 4-Chlorotoluene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 2-Chlorotoluene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Dibromomethane <0 100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 1,2-Dichloroethane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 1,1-Dichloroethane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 1,1-Dichloroethene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 1,2-Dichloropropane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 1,3-Dichloropropane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 2,2-Dichloropropane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12.23 1 1,1-Dichloropropene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Diethyl ether <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Ethylbenzene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Hexachlorobutadiene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Isopropylbenzene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 p-Isopropyltoluene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 4-Methy1-2-pentanone(MIBK) <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Methylene Chloride <0.250 0.250 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Methyl tert-butyl ether <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Naphthalene <0.250 0.250 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 N-Propylbenzene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 26 of 86 3/5/2019 Client Sample Results Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: Trip Blank Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-6 Date Collected: 02/21/19 08:00 Matrix:Soil Date Received:02/23/19 09:30 Method:8260B-Volatile Organic Compounds(GC/MS)(Continued) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Styrene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 c 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 6 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Tetrachloroethene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Tetrahydrofuran <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Toluene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Trichloroethene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Trichlorofluoromethane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Vinyl chloride <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 `_ #``1 Xylenes,Total <0.150 0.150 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 97 80-120 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) 92 80.120 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Toluene-d8(Surr) 99 80-120 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 12:23 1 Method:WI-GRO-Wisconsin -Gasoline Range Organics(GC) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Wisconsin GRO <10.0 10.0 mg/Kg 02/25/19 10:08 02/25/19 13:43 1 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 80 80-120 02/25/19 10:08 02/25/19 13:43 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 27 of 86 3/5/2019 Client Sample Results Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: Trip Blank Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-7 Date Collected:02/21/19 08:00 Matrix:Water Date Received:02/23/19 09:30 Method: 8260B-Volatile Organic Compounds(GC/MS) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Acetone <10.0 10.0 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 c Allyl chloride <2.00 2.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 6 Benzene <0.500 0.500 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 Bromobenzene <1 00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 Bromochloromethane <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 Bromodichloromethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 Bromoform <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 Bromomethane <4.00 4.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 2-Butanone(MEK) <10.0 10.0 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 n-Butylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 sec-Butylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 tert-Butylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 Carbon tetrachloride <2.00 2.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 Chlorobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 Chlorodibromomethane <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 Dichlorofluoromethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 I Chloroethane <4.00 4.00 ug/L 02/25/1922:58 1 's " Chloroform <3.00 3.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 Chloromethane <3.00 3.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 4-Chlorotoluene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 2-Chlorotoluene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane <3.00 3.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 1,2-Dichloroethane <1.00 * 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 1,1-Dichloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 1,1-Dichloroethene <2.00 2.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 1,2-Dichloropropane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 1,3-Dichloropropane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/1922:58 1 2,2-Dichloropropane <4.00 4.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 1,1-Dichloropropene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 Diethyl ether <2.00 2.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 Ethylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 Hexachlorobutadiene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 lsopropylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 p-lsopropyltoluene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) <10.0 10.0 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 Methylene Chloride <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22.58 1 Methyl tert-butyl ether <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 Naphthalene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 N-Propylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 Styrene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 28 of 86 3/5/2019 Client Sample Results Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID:310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: Trip Blank Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-7 Date Collected: 02/21/19 08:00 Matrix:Water Date Received:02/23/19 09:30 Method: 8260B-Volatile Organic Compounds(GC/MS)(Continued) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 6 Tetrachloroethene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 Tetrahydrofuran <10.0 10.0 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 Toluene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 Trichloroethene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 Trichlorofluoromethane <4.00 4.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane <2.00 2.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 Vinyl chloride <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 Xylenes,Total <3.00 3.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 Dibromomethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 22:58 1 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Di!Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 93 80.120 02/25/19 22:58 1 Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) 105 80.120 02/25/19 22:58 1 Toluene-d8(Surr) 103 80.120 02/25/19 22:58 1 Method:WI-GRO-Wisconsin -Gasoline Range Organics(GC) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Wisconsin GRO <100 100 ug/L 02/25/19 16:51 1 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 93 80.120 02/25/19 16:51 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 29 of 86 3/5/2019 Client Sample Results Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 ;tient Sample ID: B-2 Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-8 Date Collected:02/21/19 12:40 Matrix: Ground Water Date Received: 02/23/19 09:30 Method:8260B-Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Acetone <10.0 10.0 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 c Allyl chloride <2.00 2.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 6 Benzene <0.500 0.500 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 Bromobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 Bromochloromethane <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 Bromodichloromethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 Bromoform <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 Bromomethane <4.00 4.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 2-Butanone(MEK) <10.0 10.0 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 n-Butylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 sec-Butylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 tert-Butylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 Carbon tetrachloride <2.00 2.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 Chlorobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 Chlorodibromomethane <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 Dichlorofluoromethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 '" Chloroethane <4.00 4.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 4,„„' Chloroform <3.00 3.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 Chloromethane <3.00 3.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 4-Chlorotoluene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 2-Chlorotoluene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane <3.00 3.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 1,2-Dichloroethane <1.00 * 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 1,1-Dichloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 1,1-Dichloroethene <2.00 2.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 1,2-Dichloropropane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 1,3-Dichloropropane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 2,2-Dichloropropane <4.00 4.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 1,1-Dichloropropene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 Diethyl ether 16.2 2.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 Ethylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 Hexachlorobutadiene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 lsopropylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 p-lsopropyltoluene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) <10.0 10.0 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 Methylene Chloride <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 Methyl tert-butyl ether <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 Naphthalene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 N-Propylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 Styrene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 30 of 86 3/5/2019 Client Sample Results Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-2 Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-8 Date Collected: 02/21/19 12:40 Matrix: Ground Water Date Received:02/23/19 09:30 Method:8260B-Volatile Organic Compounds(GC/MS)(Continued) ` il Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 6 Tetrachloroethene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 Tetrahydrofuran <10.0 10.0 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 Toluene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <5 00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 Trichloroethene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 Trichlorofluoromethane <4.00 4.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane <2.00 2.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 Vinyl chloride <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 f,,',,ii; Xylenes,Total <3.00 3.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 , .: ,` Dibromomethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:22 1 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dii Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 98 80-120 02/25/19 23:22 1 Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) 103 80-120 02/25/19 23:22 1 Toluene-d8(Surr) 105 80-120 02/25/19 23:22 1 Method:8270D SIM -Semivolatile Organic Compound(GC/MS SIM LL) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Acenaphthene <1.12 1.12 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 19:46 10 Acenaphthylene <1.12 1.12 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 19:46 10 Anthracene <1.12 1.12 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 19:46 10 Benzo[a]anthracene <1.12 1.12 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 19:46 10 Benzo[a]pyrene <1.12 1.12 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 19:46 10 Benzo[b]fluoranthene <1.12 1.12 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 19:46 10 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene <1.12 1.12 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 19:46 10 Benzo[k]fluoranthene <1.12 1.12 ug/L 02/25/1914.38 02/26/19 19:46 10 Chrysene <1.12 1.12 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 19:46 10 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene <1.12 * 1.12 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 19:46 10 Fluoranthene <1.12 1.12 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 19:46 10 Fluorene <1.12 1.12 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 19:46 10 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene <1.12 1.12 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 19:46 10 2-Methylnaphthalene <1.12 1.12 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 19:46 10 Naphthalene <5.62 5.62 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 19:46 10 Phenanthrene <1.12 1.12 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 19:46 10 Pyrene <1.12 1.12 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 19:46 10 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dii Fac 2-Fluorobiphenyl(Surr) 82 22-110 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 19:46 10 Nitrobenzene-d5(Surr) 88 17-116 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 19:46 10 Terphenyl-d14(Surr) 140 X 10-136 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 19:46 10 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 31 of 86 3/5/2019 Client Sample Results Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-2 Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-8 Date Collected: 02/21/19 12:40 Matrix: Ground Water Date Received:02/23/19 09:30 Method:WI-GRO-Wisconsin-Gasoline Range Organics(GC) ;>, to Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Faces',$„) Wisconsin GRO <100 100 ug/L 02/25/19 21:35 1 6 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 91 80.120 02/25/19 21:35 1 Method:WI-DRO-Wisconsin -Diesel Range Organics(GC)-Silica Gel Cleanup Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Diesel Range Organics(DRO) <0.120 * 0.120 mg/L 02/26/19 08:45 03/01/19 08:39 1 Method:6020B-Metals(ICP/MS)-Dissolved Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Arsenic 0.00898 0.00200 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/01/19 19:40 1 Barium 0.893 0.00200 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/01/19 19:40 1 Cadmium <0.000500 0.000500 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/01/19 19:40 1 Chromium <0.00500 0.00500 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/01/19 19:40 1 Lead <0.000500 0.000500 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/01/19 19:40 1 Selenium <0.00500 0.00500 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/01/19 19:40 1 AS”; Silver <0.00100 0.00100 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/01/19 19:40 1 .': Method:7470A-Mercury(CVAA)-Dissolved Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Mercury <0.000200 0.000200 mg/L 02/26/19 09:34 02/27/19 16:23 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 32 of 86 3/5/2019 Client Sample Results Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID:310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-3 Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-9 Date Collected: 02/21/19 13:55 Matrix: Ground Water Date Received:02/23/19 09:30 Method: 8260B-Volatile Organic Compounds(GC/MS) '.,,:;,„ , Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Acetone 11.9 10.0 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 c Allyl chloride <2.00 2.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 6 Benzene 3.24 0.500 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 Bromobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 Bromochloromethane <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 Bromodichloromethane <1 00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 Bromoform <5 00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 Bromomethane <4.00 4.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 2-Butanone(MEK) <10.0 10.0 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 n-Butylbenzene 1.09 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 sec-Butylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 tert-Butylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 Carbon tetrachloride <2.00 2.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 Chlorobenzene 3.04 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 Chlorodibromomethane <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 Dichlorofluoromethane <1 00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 Chloroethane <4 00 4.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 Chloroform <3 00 3.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 Chloromethane <3.00 3.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 4-Chlorotoluene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 2-Chlorotoluene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 4.06 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 2.18 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 6.54 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane <3.00 3.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 1,2-Dichloroethane <1.00 * 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 1,1-Dichloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 1,1-Dichloroethene <2.00 2.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 1,2-Dichloropropane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 1,3-Dichloropropane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 2,2-Dichloropropane <4.00 4.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 1,1-Dichloropropene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/1923:46 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 Diethyl ether <2.00 2.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 Ethylbenzene 3.98 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 Hexachlorobutadiene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 lsopropylbenzene 1.51 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 p-Isopropyltoluene 5.33 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) <10.0 10.0 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 Methylene Chloride <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 Methyl tert-butyl ether <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23.46 1 Naphthalene 6.29 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 N-Propylbenzene 2.16 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 Styrene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 33 of 86 3/5/2019 Client Sample Results Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 ;tient Sample ID: B-3 Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-9 Date Collected: 02/21/19 13:55 Matrix: Ground Water Date Received:02/23/19 09:30 Method:8260B-Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)(Continued) keIN Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed ,Dil Fac t-,,,,,1-4 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 c 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 6 Tetrachloroethene <1 00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 Tetrahydrofuran <10.0 10.0 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 Toluene 2.08 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 Trichloroethene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 Trichlorofluoromethane <4.00 4.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane <2.00 2.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 17.1 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 5.73 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 Vinyl chloride <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 ;L Xylenes,Total 20.1 3.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 ,,:4 ,tet,#, Dibromomethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 23:46 1 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 96 80.120 02/25/19 23:46 1 Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) 104 80_120 02/25/19 23:46 1 Toluene-d8(Surr) 102 80.120 02/25/19 23:46 1 L. Method: 8270D SIM -Semivolatile Organic Compound (GC/MS SIM LL) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Acenaphthene 2.94 1.06 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:04 10 Acenaphthylene <1.06 1.06 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:04 10 Anthracene 1.69 1.06 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:04 10 Benzo[a]anthracene 2.67 1.06 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:04 10 Benzo[a]pyrene 2.08 1.06 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:04 10 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 2.91 1.06 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:04 10 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 1.25 1.06 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:04 10 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 1.27 1.06 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:04 10 Chrysene 3.94 1.06 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:04 10 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene <1 06 * 1.06 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:04 10 Fluoranthene 7.79 1.06 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:04 10 Fluorene 2.34 1.06 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:04 10 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 1.35 1.06 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20.04 10 2-Methylnaphthalene <1 06 1.06 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:04 10 Naphthalene 5.64 5.32 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:04 10 Phenanthrene 6.18 1.06 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:04 10 Pyrene 5.85 1.06 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:04 10 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 2-Fluorobiphenyl(Surr) 76 22-110 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:04 10 Nitrobenzene-d5(Surr) 76 17.116 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:04 10 Terphenyl-d14(Surr) 81 10.136 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:04 10 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 34 of 86 3/5/2019 Client Sample Results Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-3 Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-9 Date Collected: 02/21/19 13:55 Matrix:Ground Water Date Received:02/23/19 09:30 Method:WI-GRO-Wisconsin -Gasoline Range Organics(GC) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac i, Wisconsin GRO <100 100 ug/L 02/25/19 21:07 1 6 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 93 80.120 02/25/19 21:07 1 Method:WI-DRO-Wisconsin-Diesel Range Organics(GC)-Silica Gel Cleanup Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Diesel Range Organics(DRO) 0.581 ' 0.106 mg/L 02/26/19 08:45 03/01/19 09:54 1 Method:6020B-Metals(ICP/MS)-Dissolved Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Arsenic <0.00200 0.00200 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/01/19 19:44 1 Barium 0.784 0.00200 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/01/19 19:44 1 Cadmium <0.000500 0.000500 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/01/19 19:44 1 Chromium <0.00500 0.00500 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/01/19 19:44 1 Lead <0.000500 0.000500 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/01/19 19:44 1 Selenium <0 00500 0.00500 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/01/19 19:44 1 Silver <0.00100 0.00100 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/01/19 19:44 1 s ', Method: 7470A-Mercury(CVAA) -Dissolved Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Mercury <0.000200 0.000200 mg/L 02/26/19 09:34 02/27/19 16:26 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 35 of 86 3/5/2019 Client Sample Results } Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-4 Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-10 Date Collected:02/21/19 15:30 Matrix: Ground Water Date Received:02/23/19 09:30 Method:8260B-Volatile Organic Compounds(GC/MS) LES,: Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fact Acetone <10.0 10.0 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 Allyl chloride <2.00 2.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 6 Benzene <0.500 0.500 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 Bromobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 Bromochloromethane <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 Bromodichloromethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 Bromoform <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 Bromomethane <4.00 4.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 2-Butanone(MEK) <10.0 10.0 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 n-Butylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 sec-Butylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 tert-Butylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 Carbon tetrachloride <2.00 2.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 Chlorobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 Chlorodibromomethane <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 Dichlorofluoromethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 Chloroethane <4.00 4.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 x Chloroform <3.00 3.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 Chloromethane <3.00 3.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 4-Chlorotoluene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 2-Chlorotoluene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00.10 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane <3.00 3.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 1,2-Dichloroethane <1.00 * 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 1,1-Dichloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 1,1-Dichloroethene <2.00 2.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 1,2-Dichloropropane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 1,3-Dichloropropane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 2,2-Dichloropropane <4.00 4.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 1,1-Dichloropropene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 Diethyl ether <2.00 2.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 Ethylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 Hexachlorobutadiene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 Isopropylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 p-Isopropyltoluene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) <10.0 10.0 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 Methylene Chloride <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 Methyl tert-butyl ether <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 Naphthalene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 N-Propylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 Styrene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 36 of 86 3/5/2019 Client Sample Results Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID:310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-4 Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-10 Date Collected:02/21/19 15:30 Matrix:Ground Water Date Received:02/23/19 09:30 Method:8260B-Volatile Organic Compounds(GC/MS)(Continued) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac t 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 c 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 6 Tetrachloroethene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 Tetrahydrofuran <10.0 10.0 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 Toluene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 'I r 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 Trichloroethene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 Trichlorofluoromethane <4.00 4.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane <2.00 2.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 Vinyl chloride <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 i[ Xylenes,Total <3.00 3.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 ' Dibromomethane <1 00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:10 1 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 97 80.120 02/26/19 00:10 1 Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) 105 80.120 02/26/19 00:10 1 Toluene-d8(Surr) 103 80.120 02/26/19 00:10 1 Method:8270D SIM -Semivolatile Organic Compound(GC/MS SIM LL) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Acenaphthene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:22 10 Acenaphthylene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:22 10 Anthracene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14.38 02/26/19 20:22 10 Benzo[a]anthracene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:22 10 Benzo[a]pyrene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:22 10 Benzo[b]fluoranthene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:22 10 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:22 10 Benzo[k]fluoranthene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:22 10 Chrysene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:22 10 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene <1.05 * 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:22 10 Fluoranthene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:22 10 Fluorene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:22 10 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:22 10 2-Methylnaphthalene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:22 10 Naphthalene <5.26 5.26 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:22 10 Phenanthrene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:22 10 Pyrene <1 05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:22 10 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 2-Fluorobiphenyl(Surr) 72 22-110 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:22 10 Nitrobenzene-d5(Surr) 73 17-116 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:22 10 Terphenyl-d14(Surr) 73 10-136 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:22 10 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 37 of 86 3/5/2019 Client Sample Results k Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 :tient Sample ID: B-4 Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-10 Date Collected: 02/21/19 15:30 Matrix: Ground Water Date Received:02/23/19 09:30 Method:WI-GRO-Wisconsin -Gasoline Range Organics(GC) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Wisconsin GRO <100 100 ug/L 02/25/19 20:38 1 t. Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 90 80-120 02/25/19 20:38 1 Method:WI-DRO-Wisconsin-Diesel Range Organics(GC)-Silica Gel Cleanup Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Diesel Range Organics(DRO) 0.204 * 0.108 mg/L 02/26/19 08:45 03/01/19 08:52 1 Method: 6020B-Metals(ICP/MS)-Dissolved Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Arsenic 0.00253 0.00200 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/01/19 19:47 1 Barium 0.207 0.00200 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/01/19 19:47 1 Cadmium <0.000500 0.000500 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/01/19 19:47 1 Chromium <0.00500 0.00500 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/01/19 19:47 1 Lead <0.000500 0.000500 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/01/19 19:47 1 Selenium <0.00500 0.00500 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/01/19 19:47 1 04. Silver <0.00100 0.00100 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/01/19 19:471 `i, Method:7470A-Mercury(CVAA)-Dissolved Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Mercury <0.000200 0.000200 mg/L 02/26/19 09:34 02/27/19 16:28 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 38 of 86 3/5/2019 Client Sample Results Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-5 Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-11 Date Collected:02/21/19 16:45 Matrix:Ground Water Date Received:02/23/19 09:30 Method: 8260B-Volatile Organic Compounds(GC/MS) r, '~"" Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac ,' `. Acetone <10.0 10.0 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 Allyl chloride <2.00 2.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 Benzene <0.500 0.500 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 Bromobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 Bromochloromethane <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 Bromodichloromethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 s Bromoform <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 Bromomethane <4.00 4.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 2-Butanone(MEK) <10.0 10.0 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 n-Butylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 sec-Butylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 tert-Butylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 Carbon tetrachloride <2.00 2.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00.34 1 Chlorobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00.34 1 Chlorodibromomethane <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00 34 1 Dichlorofluoromethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 %, Chloroethane <4.00 4.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 saz Chloroform <3.00 3.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 Chloromethane <3.00 3.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 4-Chlorotoluene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 2-Chlorotoluene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane <3.00 3.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 1,2-Dichloroethane <1 00 * 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 1,1-Dichloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 1,1-Dichloroethene <2.00 2.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 1,2-Dichloropropane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 1,3-Dichloropropane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 2,2-Dichloropropane <4.00 4.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 1,1-Dichloropropene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 Diethyl ether <2.00 2.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 Ethylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 Hexachlorobutadiene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 Isopropylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 p-lsopropyltoluene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) <10.0 10.0 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 Methylene Chloride <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 Methyl tert-butyl ether <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 Naphthalene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 N-Propylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 Styrene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 39 of 86 3/5/2019 Client Sample Results Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID:310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-5 Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-11 Date Collected:02/21/19 16:45 Matrix: Ground Water Date Received: 02/23/19 09:30 Method: 8260B-Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS)(Continued) is Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00.34 1 c 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 6 Tetrachloroethene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 Tetrahydrofuran <10.0 10.0 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 Toluene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 "' Trichloroethene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 Trichlorofluoromethane <4.00 4.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 1,2,3-Tnchloropropane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane <2.00 2.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 Vinyl chloride <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 Xylenes,Total <3.00 3.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 Dibromomethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/26/19 00:34 1 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 95 80_120 02/26/19 00:34 1 Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) 104 80_120 02/26/19 00:34 1 Thi nue (Surr) 103 80.120 02/26/19 00:34 1 Method:8270D SIM-Semivolatile Organic Compound(GC/MS SIM LL) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Acenaphthene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:41 10 Acenaphthylene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:41 10 Anthracene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:41 10 Benzo[a]anthracene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:41 10 Benzo[a]pyrene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:41 10 Benzo[b]fluoranthene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:41 10 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:41 10 Benzo[k]fluoranthene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:41 10 Chrysene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:41 10 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene <1.05 * 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:41 10 Fluoranthene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:41 10 Fluorene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:41 10 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/1914.38 02/26/19 20:41 10 2-Methylnaphthalene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:41 10 Naphthalene <5.26 5.26 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:41 10 Phenanthrene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:41 10 Pyrene <1.05 1.05 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:41 10 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 2-Fluorobiphenyl(Surr) 69 22.110 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:41 10 Nitrobenzene-d5(Surr) 71 17.116 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:41 10 Terphenyl-d14(Surr) 68 10_136 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 20:41 10 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 40 of 86 3/5/2019 Client Sample Results Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-5 Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-11 Date Collected:02/21/19 16:45 Matrix: Ground Water Date Received:02/23/19 09:30 Method:WI-GRO-Wisconsin-Gasoline Range Organics(GC) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Wisconsin GRO <100 100 ug/L 02/25/19 20:10 1 6 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 91 80-120 02/25/19 20:10 1 Method:WI-DRO-Wisconsin-Diesel Range Organics(GC)-Silica Gel Cleanup Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Diesel Range Organics(DRO) 0.175 ' 0.105 mg/L 02/26/19 08:45 03/01/19 10 07 1 Method: 6020B-Metals(ICP/MS)-Dissolved Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Arsenic <0.00200 0.00200 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/01/19 20:03 1 Barium 0.484 0.00200 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/01/19 20:03 1 Cadmium <0.000500 0.000500 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/01/19 20:03 1 Chromium <0.00500 0.00500 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/01/19 20:03 1 Lead 0.000580 0.000500 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/01/19 20:03 1 Selenium <0.00500 0.00500 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/01/19 20:03 1 Silver <0.00100 0.00100 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/01/19 20:03 1 `} Method: 7470A-Mercury(CVAA) -Dissolved Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Mercury <0.000200 0.000200 mg/L 02/26/19 09:34 02/27/19 16:34 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 41 of 86 3/5/2019 Definitions/Glossary Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Qualifiers GC/MS VOA Qualifier Qualifier Description * LCS or LCSD is outside acceptance limits. F1 MS and/or MSD Recovery is outside acceptance limits. tt<. GC/MS Semi VOA Qualifier Qualifier Description RPD of the LCS and LCSD exceeds the control limits a X Surrogate is outside control limits GC Semi VOA Qualifier Qualifier Description * LCS or LCSD is outside acceptance limits. X Surrogate is outside control limits Glossary Abbreviation These commonly used abbreviations may or may not be present in this report. o Listed under the"D"column to designate that the result is reported on a dry weight basis %R Percent Recovery CFL Contains Free Liquid CNF Contains No Free Liquid DER Duplicate Error Ratio(normalized absolute difference) Dil Fac Dilution Factor DL Detection Limit(DoD/DOE) L,RA,RE,IN Indicates a Dilution,Re-analysis,Re-extraction,or additional Initial metals/anion analysis of the sample LC Decision Level Concentration(Radiochemistry) EDL Estimated Detection Limit(Dioxin) LOD Limit of Detection(DoD/DOE) LOQ Limit of Quantitation(DoD/DOE) MDA Minimum Detectable Activity(Radiochemistry) MDC Minimum Detectable Concentration(Radiochemistry) MDL Method Detection Limit ML Minimum Level(Dioxin) NC Not Calculated ND Not Detected at the reporting limit(or MDL or EDL if shown) PQL Practical Quantitation Limit QC Quality Control RER Relative Error Ratio(Radiochemistry) RL Reporting Limit or Requested Limit(Radiochemistry) RPD Relative Percent Difference,a measure of the relative difference between two points TEF Toxicity Equivalent Factor(Dioxin) TEQ Toxicity Equivalent Quotient(Dioxin) TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 42 of 86 3/5/2019 Surrogate Summary Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Matrix:Ground Water Prep Type:Total/NA Percent Surrogate Recovery(Acceptance Limits) BFB DBFM TOL Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (80-120) (80-120) (80-120) 310-149954-8 0-2 98 103 105 310-149954-9 8-3 96 104 102 310-149954-10 13-4 97 105 103 310-149954-11 13-5 95 104 103 Surrogate Legend 8 BFB=4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) DBFM=Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) TOL=Toluene-d8(Surr) Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Matrix:Soil Prep Type:Total/NA Percent Surrogate Recovery(Acceptance Limits) BFB DBFM TOL Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (80-120) (80-120) (80-120) 310-149954-1 B-1(5-10') 98 93 98 310-149954-2 8-2(15-20') 98 96 98 310-149954-2 MS B-2(15-20') 100 97 98 310-149954-2 MSD B-2(15-20') 97 99 100 310-149954-3 B-3(12.5-15') 96 92 98 310-149954-4 B-4(12.5-15') 98 95 99 310-149954-5 B-5(20-22 5') 101 93 98 310-149954-6 Trip Blank 97 92 99 Surrogate Legend BFB=4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) DBFM=Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) TOL=Toluene-d8(Surr) Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Matrix:Solid Prep Type:Total/NA Percent Surrogate Recovery(Acceptance Limits) BFB DBFM TOL Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (80-120) (80-120) (80-120) LCS 310-231050/2-A Lab Control Sample 101 99 98 MB 310-231050/1-A Method Blank 100 97 101 Surrogate Legend BFB=4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) DBFM=Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) TOL=Toluene-d8(Surr) TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 43 of 86 3/5/2019 Surrogate Summary Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID:310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Matrix:Water Prep Type:Total/NA Percent Surrogate Recovery(Acceptance Limits) BFB DBFM TOL Yana. Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (80-120) (80-120) (80-120) 310-149954-7 Trip Blank 93 105 103 LCS 310-230851/6 Lab Control Sample 93 106 104 LCS 310-230851/7 Lab Control Sample 95 105 105 MB 310-230851/8 Method Blank 96 101 103 Surrogate Legend 8 BFB=4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) DBFM=Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) TOL=Toluene-d8(Surr) Method: 8270D SIM -Semivolatile Organic Compound (GC/MS SIM LL) Matrix:Ground Water Prep Type:Total/NA Percent Surrogate Recovery(Acceptance Limits) FBP NBZ TPHL Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (22-110) (17-116) (10-136) 310-149954-8 B-2 82 88 140 X , 3 310-149954-9 B-3 76 76 81 310-149954-10 B-4 72 73 73 310-149954-11 B-5 69 71 68 Surrogate Legend FBP=2-Fluorobiphenyl(Surr) NBZ=Nitrobenzene-d5(Surr) TPHL=Terphenyl-d14(Surr) Method: 8270D SIM - Semivolatile Organic Compound (GC/MS SIM LL) Matrix:Soil Prep Type:Total/NA Percent Surrogate Recovery(Acceptance Limits) FBP NBZ TPHL Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (28-110) (22-110) (26-110) 310-149954-1 B-1 (5-10') 63 71 63 310-149954-1 MS B-1(5-10') 58 64 59 310-149954-1 MSD B-1(5-10') 61 67 63 310-149954-2 8-2(15-20') 59 104 66 310-149954-3 6-3(12.5-15') 60 75 61 310-149954-4 B-4(12.5-15') 67 90 63 310-149954-5 8-5(20-22.5') 50 119 X 46 Surrogate Legend FBP=2-Fluorobiphenyl(Surr) NBZ=Nitrobenzene-d5(Surr) TPHL=Terphenyl-d14(Surr) TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 44 of 86 3/5/2019 Surrogate Summary Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: 8270D SIM -Semivolatile Organic Compound (GC/MS SIM LL) Matrix:Solid Prep Type:Total/NA Percent Surrogate Recovery(Acceptance Limits) FBP NBZ TPHL Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (28-110) (22-110) (26-110) LCS 310-231031/2-A Lab Control Sample 58 63 68 MB 310-231031/1-A Method Blank 58 65 63 Surrogate Legend FBP=2-Fluorobiphenyl(Surr) NBZ=Nitrobenzene-d5(Surr) 8 TPHL=Terphenyl-d14(Surr) v Method: 8270D SIM -Semivolatile Organic Compound (GC/MS SIM LL) Matrix:Water Prep Type:Total/NA Percent Surrogate Recovery(Acceptance Limits) FBP NBZ TPHL Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (22-110) (17-116) (10-136) LCS 310-230933/2-A Lab Control Sample 57 61 64 LCSD 310-230933/3-A Lab Control Sample Dup 60 64 68 MB 310-230933/1-A Method Blank 65 69 68v S 9 Surrogate Legend FBP=2-Fluorobiphenyl(Surr) NBZ=Nitrobenzene-d5(Surr) TPHL=Terphenyl-d14(Surr) Method: WI-GRO -Wisconsin - Gasoline Range Organics (GC) Matrix:Ground Water Prep Type:Total/NA Percent Surrogate Recovery(Acceptance Limits) BFB Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (80-120) 310-149954-8 B-2 91 310-149954-9 B-3 93 310-149954-10 B-4 90 310-149954-11 B-5 91 Surrogate Legend BFB=4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) Method: WI-GRO -Wisconsin - Gasoline Range Organics (GC) Matrix:Soil Prep Type:Total/NA Percent Surrogate Recovery(Acceptance Limits) BFB Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (80-120) 310-149954-1 B-1(5-10') 95 310-149954-2 B-2(15-20') 101 310-149954-3 B-3(12.5-15') 97 310-149954-4 B-4(12.5-15') 87 310-149954-5 B-5(20-22.5') 119 310-149954-6 Trip Blank 80 Surrogate Legend TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 45 of 86 3/5/2019 Surrogate Summary Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 BFB=4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) Method: WI-GRO -Wisconsin - Gasoline Range Organics (GC) Matrix:Solid Prep Type:Total/NA Percent Surrogate Recovery(Acceptance Limits) kt BFB Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (80-120) LCS 310-230926/2-A Lab Control Sample 101 LCSD 310-230926/25-A Lab Control Sample Dup 100 MB 310-230926/1-A Method Blank 91 8 Surrogate Legend BFB=4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) Method: WI-GRO -Wisconsin - Gasoline Range Organics (GC) Matrix:Water Prep Type:Total/NA Percent Surrogate Recovery(Acceptance Limits) BFB Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (80-120) 310-149954-7 Trip Blank 93 LCS 310-230907/5 Lab Control Sample 96 A LCSD 310-230907/29 Lab Control Sample Dup 96 MB 310-230907/4 Method Blank 93 Surrogate Legend BFB=4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) Method: 8082A - Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) by Gas Chromatography Matrix:Soil Prep Type:Total/NA Percent Surrogate Recovery(Acceptance Limits) DCB1 TCX1 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (10-110) (10-110) 310-149954-1 B-1(5-10') 63 63 310-149954-2 B-2(15-20') 59 171 X 310-149954-3 B-3(12.5-15') 49 275 X 310-149954-4 B-4(12.5-15') 59 88 310-149954-5 B-5(20-22.5') 43 246 X Surrogate Legend DCB=DCB Decachlorobiphenyl(Surr) TCX=Tetrachloro-m-xylene Method: 8082A - Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) by Gas Chromatography Matrix:Solid Prep Type:Total/NA Percent Surrogate Recovery(Acceptance Limits) DCB1 TCX1 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (10-110) (10-110) LCS 310-231032/2-A Lab Control Sample 94 89 MB 310-231032/1-A Method Blank 117 X 110 Surrogate Legend DCB=DCB Decachlorobiphenyl(Surr) TCX=Tetrachloro-m-xylene TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 46 of 86 3/5/2019 QC Sample Results Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Lab Sample ID: MB 310-230851/8 Client Sample ID:Method Blank Matrix:Water Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 230851s`'; MB MB i' Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Di!Fac Acetone <10.0 10.0 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 Allyl chloride <2 00 2.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 Benzene <0.500 0.500 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 Bromobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 Bromochloromethane <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 Bromodichloromethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 Bromoform <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 9 Bromomethane <4.00 4.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 2-Butanone(MEK) <10.0 10.0 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 n-Butylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 sec-Butylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 tert-Butylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 Carbon tetrachloride <2.00 2.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 Chlorobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 Chlorodibromomethane <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 i;;i Dichlorofluoromethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 Chloroethane <4.00 4.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 Chloroform <3.00 3.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 Chloromethane <3.00 3.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 4-Chlorotoluene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 2-Chlorotoluene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20.57 1 1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane <3.00 3.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 1,2-Dichloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 1,1-Dichloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 1,1-Dichloroethene <2.00 2.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 1,2-Dichloropropane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 1,3-Dichloropropane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 2,2-Dichloropropane <4.00 4.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 1,1-Dichloropropene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 Diethyl ether <2.00 2.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 Ethylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 Hexachlorobutadiene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 lsopropylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 p-lsopropyltoluene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) <10.0 10.0 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 Methylene Chloride <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 Methyl tert-butyl ether <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 Naphthalene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 N-Propylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 47 of 86 3/5/2019 QC Sample Results Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Lab Sample ID: MB 310-230851/8 Client Sample ID: Method Blank Matrix:Water Prep Type:Total/NA Analysis Batch:230851 ,; MB MB g-a j Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Styrene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 Tetrachloroethene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 Tetrahydrofuran <10.0 10.0 ug/L 02/25/19 20 57 1 Toluene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 "' 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 9 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 Trichloroethene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 Trichlorofluoromethane <4.00 4.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane <2.00 2.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 ; 3; h ; 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 e4-1 Y._4 Vinyl chloride <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 Xylenes,Total <3.00 3.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 Dibromomethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 02/25/19 20:57 1 MB MB Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 96 80-120 02/25/19 20:57 1 Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) 101 80.120 02/25/19 20:57 1 Toluene-d8(Surr) 103 80_120 02/25/19 20:57 1 Lab Sample ID: LCS 310-230851/6 Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix:Water Prep Type:Total/NA Analysis Batch:230851 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Acetone 40.0 43.79 ug/L 109 50_150 Allyl chloride 20.0 19.93 ug/L 100 50.150 Benzene 20.0 21.90 ug/L 109 77-120 Bromobenzene 20.0 20.21 ug/L 101 70_120 Bromochloromethane 20.0 24.39 ug/L 122 73.132 Bromodichloromethane 20.0 19.13 ug/L 96 73.120 Bromoform 20.0 13.86 ug/L 69 57-120 2-Butanone(MEK) 40.0 45.08 ug/L 113 50_150 n-Butylbenzene 20.0 19.70 ug/L 99 63-120 sec-Butylbenzene 20.0 19.41 ug/L 97 64_120 tert-Butylbenzene 20.0 19.10 ug/L 95 64_120 Carbon tetrachloride 20.0 20.99 ug/L 105 72.126 Chlorobenzene 20.0 20.41 ug/L 102 74-120 Chlorodibromomethane 20.0 14.60 ug/L 73 66-120 Chloroform 20.0 24.03 ug/L 120 78_121 4-Chlorotoluene 20.0 19.84 ug/L 99 71_120 2-Chlorotoluene 20.0 19.99 ug/L 100 71-120 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 20.0 13.33 ug/L 67 50.150 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 48 of 86 3/5/2019 QC Sample Resultsi5 Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Lab Sample ID:LCS 310-230851/6 Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix:Water Prep Type:Total/NA Analysis Batch: 230851 x Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits 1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) 20.0 19.35 ug/L 97 71_125 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 20.0 20.74 ug/L 104 66_120 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 20.0 20.08 ug/L 100 67_120 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 20.0 19.40 ug/L 97 68_120 1,2-Dichloroethane 20.0 26.05 * ug/L 130 75_123 1,1-Dichloroethane 20.0 21.73 ug/L 109 75.125 1,1-Dichloroethene 20.0 23.57 ug/L 118 75.124 9 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 20.0 22.75 ug/L 114 77-120 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 20.0 23.99 ug/L 120 75_122 1,2-Dichloropropane 20.0 21.26 ug/L 106 75.123 1,3-Dichloropropane 20.0 21.41 ug/L 107 75.123 2,2-Dichloropropane 20.0 17.67 ug/L 88 50.150 1,1-Dichloropropene 20.0 23.61 ug/L 118 77.124 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 20.0 18.15 ug/L 91 70.120 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 20.0 16.46 ug/L 82 69.1202 04 Diethyl ether 20.0 24.23 ug/L 121 71_122h', Ethylbenzene 20.0 20.93 ug/L 105 73_120 Hexachlorobutadiene 20.0 18.34 ug/L 92 50_150 Isopropylbenzene 20.0 19.91 ug/L 100 69_120 p-Isopropyltoluene 20.0 18.99 ug/L 95 68_120 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) 40.0 42.47 ug/L 106 59_126 Methylene Chloride 20.0 23.39 ug/L 117 50_150 Methyl tert-butyl ether 20.0 22.04 ug/L 110 72_121 Naphthalene 20.0 17.30 ug/L 87 50_150 N-Propylbenzene 20.0 20.29 ug/L 101 70_120 Styrene 20.0 20.17 ug/L 101 70.120 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 20.0 17.23 ug/L 86 72_120 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 20.0 20.11 ug/L 101 63.122 Tetrachloroethene 20.0 19.83 ug/L 99 72_129 Tetrahydrofuran 40.0 47.21 ug/L 118 63_128 Toluene 20.0 19.53 ug/L 98 74_120 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 20.0 17.87 ug/L 89 50_150 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 20.0 17.09 ug/L 85 59.120 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 20.0 22.21 ug/L 111 76_127 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 20.0 21.63 ug/L 108 69_127 Trichloroethene 20.0 21.39 ug/L 107 77-123 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 20.0 21.87 ug/L 109 66_120 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane 20.0 23.45 ug/L 117 76_131 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 20.0 18.98 ug/L 95 67.120 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 20.0 19.67 ug/L 98 68_120 Xylenes,Total 40.0 39.03 ug/L 98 69.120 Dibromomethane 20.0 20.96 ug/L 105 76_125 LCS LCS Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 93 80.120 Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) 106 80.120 Toluene-d8(Surr) 104 80.120 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 49 of 86 3/5/2019 QC Sample Results Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID:310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Lab Sample ID: LCS 310-230851/7 Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix:Water Prep Type:Total/NA Analysis Batch: 230851 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Bromomethane 20.0 12.39 ug/L 62 38_150 Dichlorofluoromethane 20.0 19.49 ug/L 97 70_131 Chloroethane 20.0 20.15 ug/L 101 69_129 Chloromethane 20.0 18.75 ug/L 94 50.150 Dichlorodifluoromethane 20.0 22.78 ug/L 114 50_150 Trichlorofluoromethane 20.0 21.98 ug/L 110 68_146 Vinyl chloride 20.0 18.68 ug/L 93 67_133 9 LCS LCS Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 95 80.120 Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) 105 80.120 Toluene-d8(Surr) 105 80_120 I--- Lab Lab Sample ID: MB 310-231050/1-A Client Sample ID: Method Blank Matrix: Solid Prep Type:Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231052 Prep Batch: 231050 MB MB Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Acetone <0.480 0.480 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Allyl chloride <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Benzene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Bromobenzene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Bromochloromethane <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Bromodichloromethane <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Bromoform <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Bromomethane <0.480 0.480 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 2-Butanone(MEK) <0.240 0.240 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 n-Butylbenzene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 sec-Butylbenzene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 tert-Butylbenzene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Carbon tetrachloride <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Chlorobenzene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Chlorodibromomethane <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Dichlorofluoromethane <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Chloroethane <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Chloroform <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Chloromethane <0.240 0.240 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 4-Chlorotoluene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 2-Chlorotoluene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 1,2-Dichloroethane <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 1,1-Dichloroethane <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 1,1-Dichloroethene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 50 of 86 3/5/2019 QC Sample Results '14 Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID:310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Lab Sample ID: MB 310-231050/1-A Client Sample ID: Method Blank Matrix: Solid Prep Type:Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231052 Prep Batch:231050 MB MB Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 1,2-Dichloropropane <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 1,3-Dichloropropane <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 2,2-Dichloropropane <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 1,1-Dichloropropene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 9 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Diethyl ether <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Ethylbenzene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Hexachlorobutadiene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Isopropylbenzene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 p-Isopropyltoluene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Methylene Chloride <0.240 0.240 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1i Methyl tert-butyl ether <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 0,r,',,' Naphthalene <0.240 0.240 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 N-Propylbenzene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Styrene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Tetrachloroethene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Tetrahydrofuran <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Toluene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Trichloroethene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Trichlorofluoromethane <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07.57 1 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Vinyl chloride <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Xylenes,Total <0.144 0.144 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Dibromomethane <0.0960 0.0960 mg/Kg 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 MB MB Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 100 80_120 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) 97 80_120 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 Toluene-d8(Surr) 101 80_120 02/27/19 05:39 02/27/19 07:57 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 51 of 86 3/5/2019 QC Sample Results Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Lab Sample ID:LCS 310-23105012-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix:Solid Prep Type: Total/NA 4e Analysis Batch: 231052 Prep Batch:231050 , Spike LCS LCS %Rec. o . _� Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Acetone 1.91 2.254 mg/Kg 118 42_150 Allyl chloride 0.956 1.023 mg/Kg 107 50.150 Benzene 0.956 1.040 mg/Kg 109 75_147 Bromobenzene 0.956 0.9477 mg/Kg 99 77_132 Bromochloromethane 0.956 0.9688 mg/Kg 101 72.150 Bromodichloromethane 0.956 0.9244 mg/Kg 97 74.144 Bromoform 0.956 0.9009 mg/Kg 94 74_124 9 2-Butanone(MEK) 1.91 2.237 mg/Kg 117 50_150 n-Butylbenzene 0.956 1.017 mg/Kg 106 73.131 sec-Butylbenzene 0.956 0.9955 mg/Kg 104 72_129 tert-Butylbenzene 0.956 0.9904 mg/Kg 104 73_128 Carbon tetrachloride 0.956 0.9375 mg/Kg 98 70_144 Chlorobenzene 0.956 0.9747 mg/Kg 102 78_132 Chlorodibromomethane 0.956 0.9810 mg/Kg 103 77_132 Chloroform 0.956 0.9386 mg/Kg 98 69_148 4-Chlorotoluene 0.956 0.9894 mg/Kg 103 74.130 2-Chlorotoluene 0.956 0.9915 mg/Kg 104 72.132 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 0.956 0.8465 mg/Kg 89 50.150 1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) 0.956 0.9927 mg/Kg 104 80.134 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.956 0.9701 mg/Kg 101 76_127 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.956 0.9601 mg/Kg 100 76_126 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.956 0.9549 mg/Kg 100 75_126 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.956 1.049 mg/Kg 110 74.148 1,1-Dichloroethane 0.956 1.054 mg/Kg 110 74_150 1,1-Dichloroethene 0.956 1.039 mg/Kg 109 74_139 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.956 1.015 mg/Kg 106 74.148 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.956 1.024 mg/Kg 107 76_139 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.956 1.068 mg/Kg 112 74_150 1,3-Dichloropropane 0.956 1.027 mg/Kg 107 80.136 2,2-Dichloropropane 0.956 1.079 mg/Kg 113 50_150 1,1-Dichloropropene 0.956 1.030 mg/Kg 108 73_144 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.956 0.9451 mg/Kg 99 78_138 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.956 1.102 mg/Kg 115 77_138 Diethyl ether 0.956 1.037 mg/Kg 108 73_150 Ethylbenzene 0.956 0.9800 mg/Kg 102 78.131 Hexachlorobutadiene 0.956 1.057 mg/Kg 111 50_150 Isopropylbenzene 0.956 0.9803 mg/Kg 103 77-130 p-Isopropyltoluene 0.956 0.9863 mg/Kg 103 73_128 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) 1.91 2.051 mg/Kg 107 64.150 Methylene Chloride 0.956 1.021 mg/Kg 107 50_150 Methyl tert-butyl ether 0.956 1.025 mg/Kg 107 79_146 Naphthalene 0.956 1.138 mg/Kg 119 50.150 N-Propylbenzene 0.956 0.9883 mg/Kg 103 77_132 Styrene 0.956 0.9863 mg/Kg 103 75_138 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.956 0.9182 mg/Kg 96 78_133 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.956 0.9672 mg/Kg 101 78_141 Tetrachloroethene 0.956 0.9919 mg/Kg 104 77_127 Tetrahydrofuran 1.91 2.282 mg/Kg 119 75.149 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 52 of 86 3/5/2019 QC Sample Results Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID:310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Lab Sample ID: LCS 310-231050/2-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix:Solid Prep Type:Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231052 Prep Batch: 231050 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Toluene 0.956 0.9715 mg/Kg 102 77.134 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 0.956 0.9663 mg/Kg 101 50_150 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.956 0.9450 mg/Kg 99 65.133 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.956 0.9649 mg/Kg 101 74_144 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.956 1.019 mg/Kg 107 80_137 Trichloroethene 0.956 1.024 mg/Kg 107 75.142 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 0.956 0.9487 mg/Kg 99 77_141 9 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane 0.956 1.023 mg/Kg 107 75-138 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.956 0.9975 mg/Kg 104 71_134 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.956 0.9945 mg/Kg 104 72-132 Xylenes,Total 1.91 1.948 mg/Kg 102 76_132 Dibromomethane 0.956 1.033 mg/Kg 108 76-148 LCS LCS Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 101 80_120 Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) 99 80_120 Toluene-d8(Surr) 98 80.120 Lab Sample ID:310-149954-2 MS Client Sample ID: B-2(15-20') Matrix:Soil Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231052 Prep Batch: 231050 Sample Sample Spike MS MS %Rec. Analyte Result Qualifier Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Acetone <0.686 2.34 2.929 mg/Kg 125 42.150 Allyl chloride <0.137 1.17 1.299 mg/Kg C 111 42.150 Benzene <0.137 1.17 1.403 mg/Kg 115 54-150 Bromobenzene <0.137 1.17 1.361 mg/Kg 0 116 56_136 Bromochloromethane <0.137 1.17 1.348 mg/Kg C 115 57_150 Bromodichloromethane <0.137 1.17 1.237 mg/Kg 106 56.149 Bromoform <0.137 1.17 1.152 mg/Kg C 98 52_128 2-Butanone(MEK) <0.343 2.34 2.810 mg/Kg C 120 50_150 <0.137 1.17 1.422 mg/Kg n-Butylbenzene 9 9 C 122 33.150 sec-Butylbenzene <0.137 1.17 1.414 mg/Kg ' 121 26.150 tert-Butylbenzene <0.137 1.17 1.388 mg/Kg 119 39_148 Carbon tetrachloride <0.137 1.17 1.234 mg/Kg 0 105 53_147 <0.137 1.17 1.373 mg/Kg Chlorobenzene 9 9 0 117 59_134 Chlorodibromomethane <0.137 1.17 1.272 mg/Kg 109 56_136 Chloroform <0.137 1.17 1.286 mg/Kg C 110 49_150 4-Chlorotoluene <0.137 1.17 1.382 mg/Kg C 118 44.149 2-Chlorotoluene <0.137 1.17 1.433 mg/Kg 0 122 50_137 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <0.137 1.17 1.028 mg/Kg 0 88 38_150 1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) <0.137 1.17 1.366 mg/Kg C 117 62_139 1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.137 1.17 1.374 mg/Kg C 117 53_131 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.137 1.17 1.400 mg/Kg C 120 52.132 1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.137 1.17 1.396 mg/Kg C 119 54.131 1,2-Dichloroethane <0.137 1.17 1.401 mg/Kg 120 54_150 1,1-Dichloroethane <0.137 1.17 1.412 mg/Kg C 121 54_150 1,1-Dichloroethene <0.137 1.17 1.408 mg/Kg C 120 53_142 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 53 of 86 3/5/2019 QC Sample Results t. Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-2 MS Client Sample ID: B-2(15-20') << Matrix:Soil Prep Type:Total/NA a .. Analysis Batch: 231052 Prep Batch:231050 8 Sample Sample Spike MS MS %Rec. Analyte Result Qualifier Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.137 1.17 1.396 mg/Kg C 119 53.150 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.137 1.17 1.421 mg/Kg 0 121 55_144 1,2-Dichloropropane <0.137 1.17 1.464 mg/Kg C 125 57-150 1,3-Dichloropropane <0.137 1.17 1.384 mg/Kg 0 118 60_141 2,2-Dichloropropane <0.137 1.17 1.286 mg/Kg 0 110 45.150 1,1-Dichloropropene <0.137 1.17 1.383 mg/Kg 0 118 54.148 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.137 1.17 1.208 mg/Kg 0 103 58_138 9 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.137 1.17 1.379 mg/Kg 0 118 58_138 Diethyl ether <0.137 1.17 1.439 mg/Kg C 123 54.150 Ethylbenzene 0.745 1.17 1.408 mg/Kg C 57 48_142 Hexachlorobutadiene <0.137 Fl 1.17 1.599 mg/Kg C 137 12_150 lsopropylbenzene <0.137 1.17 1.353 mg/Kg C 110 44.147 p-lsopropyltoluene <0.137 1.17 1.398 mg/Kg C 119 23_150 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) <0.137 2.34 2.713 mg/Kg C 116 46_150 Methylene Chloride <0.343 1.17 1.417 mg/Kg C 121 50_150 # Methyl tert-butyl ether <0.137 1.17 1.372 mg/Kg C 117 60.150 A '' Naphthalene 0.610 1.17 1.356 mg/Kg C 64 24_150 N-Propylbenzene 0.253 1.17 1.399 mg/Kg * 98 44_147 Styrene <0.137 1.17 1.382 mg/Kg C 118 47_150 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.137 1.17 1.239 mg/Kg C 106 59_136 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.137 1.17 1.359 mg/Kg C 116 48_150 Tetrachloroethene <0.137 1.17 1.368 mg/Kg C 117 50_136 Tetrahydrofuran <0.137 2.34 2.759 mg/Kg * 118 48.150 Toluene 1.28 Fl 1.17 1.416 Fl mg/Kg 0 12 50_144 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <0.137 1.17 1.293 mg/Kg C 110 33_150 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <0.137 1.17 1.326 mg/Kg 0 113 45.133 1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.137 1.17 1.258 mg/Kg 0 107 54_150 1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.137 1.17 1.389 mg/Kg d 119 60_146 Trichloroethene <0.137 1.17 1.400 mg/Kg 0 120 52.150 1,2,3-Trichloropropane <0.137 1.17 1.279 mg/Kg C 109 60_146 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane <0.137 1.17 1.455 mg/Kg C 124 51_142 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 2.19 Fl 1.17 1.614 Fl mg/Kg C -49 40-143 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.567 1.17 1.456 mg/Kg C 76 48_136 Xylenes,Total 4.53 Fl 2.34 3.037 Fl mg/Kg 0 -64 40_150 Dibromomethane <0.137 1.17 1.428 mg/Kg C 122 57.150 MS MS Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 100 80-120 Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) 97 80_120 Toluene-d8(Surr) 98 80_120 Lab Sample ID:310-149954-2 MSD Client Sample ID: B-2(15-20') Matrix:Soil Prep Type:Total/NA Analysis Batch:231052 Prep Batch: 231050 Sample Sample Spike MSD MSD %Rec. RPD Analyte Result Qualifier Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits RPD Limit Acetone <0.686 2.24 2.813 mg/Kg * 126 42_150 4 40 Allyl chloride <0.137 1.12 1.483 mg/Kg C 132 42_150 13 40 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 54 of 86 3/5/2019 QC Sample Results Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Lab Sample ID:310-149954-2 MSD .Client Sample ID: B-2(15-20') Matrix: Soil Prep Type:Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231052 Prep Batch:231050 --;ft-,;;. Sample Sample Spike MSD MSD %Rec. RPD 4,' Analyte Result Qualifier Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits RPD Limit Benzene <0.137 1.12 1.503 mg/Kg 129 54_150 7 23 Bromobenzene <0.137 1.12 1.380 mg/Kg 0 123 56_136 1 20 Bromochloromethane <0.137 1.12 1.359 mg/Kg C 121 57_150 1 21 Bromodichloromethane <0.137 1.12 1.313 mg/Kg C 117 56_149 6 20 Bromoform <0.137 1.12 1.250 mg/Kg C 112 52_128 8 36 2-Butanone(MEK) <0.343 2.24 3.002 mg/Kg 0 134 50_150 7 19 n-Butylbenzene <0.137 1.12 1.465 mg/Kg 0 131 33_150 3 40 9 sec-Butylbenzene <0.137 1.12 1.459 mg/Kg 0 130 26-150 3 26 tert-Butylbenzene <0.137 1.12 1.451 mg/Kg 0 130 39_148 4 26 Carbon tetrachloride <0.137 1.12 1.367 mg/Kg 0 122 53_147 10 19 Chlorobenzene <0.137 1.12 1.434 mg/Kg 0 128 59_134 4 20 Chlorodibromomethane <0.137 1.12 1.389 mg/Kg 124 56.136 9 21 Chloroform <0.137 1.12 1.338 mg/Kg 119 49.150 4 20 4-Chlorotoluene <0.137 1.12 1.437 mg/Kg C 128 44.149 4 22 2-Chlorotoluene <0.137 1.12 1.445 mg/Kg C 129 50_137 1 24 U 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <0.137 1.12 1.167 mg/Kg 0 104 38_150 13 40 _4 1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) <0.137 1.12 1.366 mg/Kg C 122 62.139 0 20 1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.137 1.12 1.412 mg/Kg 0 126 53.131 3 22 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.137 1.12 1.419 mg/Kg C 127 52.132 1 22 1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.137 1.12 1.401 mg/Kg 0 125 54_131 0 22 1,2-Dichloroethane <0.137 1.12 1.424 mg/Kg 127 54-150 2 20 1,1-Dichloroethane <0.137 1.12 1.456 mg/Kg 130 54_150 3 19 1,1-Dichloroethene <0.137 1.12 1.429 mg/Kg 0 128 53_142 1 24 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.137 1.12 1.461 mg/Kg C 130 53-150 5 21 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.137 1.12 1.461 mg/Kg C 130 55_144 3 21 1,2-Dichloropropane <0.137 1.12 1.506 mg/Kg C 134 57_150 3 21 1,3-Dichloropropane <0.137 1.12 1.430 mg/Kg 0 128 60.141 3 26 2,2-Dichloropropane <0.137 1.12 1.409 mg/Kg 0 126 45.150 9 20 1,1-Dichloropropene <0.137 1.12 1.470 mg/Kg C 131 54.148 6 20 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.137 1.12 1.274 mg/Kg 0 114 58_138 5 20 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.137 1.12 1.445 mg/Kg 0 129 58.138 5 20 Diethyl ether <0.137 1.12 1.416 mg/Kg 0 126 54_150 2 20 Ethylbenzene 0.745 1.12 1.459 mg/Kg 64 48_142 4 29 Hexachlorobutadiene <0.137 Fl 1.12 1.686 Fl mg/Kg 0 151 12_150 5 40 lsopropylbenzene <0.137 1.12 1.448 mg/Kg 124 44-147 7 23 p-Isopropyltoluene <0.137 1.12 1.450 mg/Kg C 129 23_150 4 25 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) <0.137 2.24 2.702 mg/Kg C 121 46.150 0 31 Methylene Chloride <0.343 1.12 1.437 mg/Kg 128 50.150 1 22 Methyl tert-butyl ether <0.137 1.12 1.357 mg/Kg C 121 60_150 1 19 Naphthalene 0.610 1.12 1.289 mg/Kg C 61 24_150 5 37 N-Propylbenzene 0.253 1.12 1.439 mg/Kg C 106 44_147 3 35 Styrene <0.137 1.12 1.444 mg/Kg 129 47.150 4 21 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.137 1.12 1.356 mg/Kg C 121 59.136 9 21 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.137 1.12 1.342 mg/Kg C 120 48_150 1 22 Tetrachloroethene <0.137 1.12 1.482 mg/Kg 132 50_136 8 23 Tetrahydrofuran <0.137 2.24 2.764 mg/Kg 0 123 48_150 0 38 Toluene 1.28 Fl 1.12 1.518 Fl mg/Kg C 21 50_144 7 30 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <0.137 1.12 1.335 mg/Kg 0 119 33_150 3 28 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 55 of 86 3/5/2019 QC Sample Results Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Lab Sample ID:310-149954-2 MSD Client Sample ID: B-2(15-20') Matrix:Soil Prep Type:Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231052 Prep Batch:231050 4 Sample Sample Spike MSD MSD %Rec. RPD -' r Analyte Result Qualifier Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits RPD Limit 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <0.137 1.12 1.312 mg/Kg 0 117 45.133 1 30 1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.137 1.12 1.406 mg/Kg 0 126 54_150 11 20 1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.137 1.12 1.361 mg/Kg * 122 60_146 2 21 Trichloroethene <0.137 1.12 1.486 mg/Kg 0 133 52_150 6 20 1,2,3-Trichloropropane <0.137 1.12 1.363 mg/Kg # 122 60.146 6 22 <` 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane <0.137 1.12 1.500 mg/Kg # 134 51_142 3 27 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 2.19 Fl 1.12 1.469 Fl mg/Kg 0 -64 40_143 9 35 9 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.567 1.12 1.459 mg/Kg # 80 48-136 0 28 Xylenes,Total 4.53 Fl 2.24 2.953 Fl mg/Kg 0 -70 40.150 3 33 Dibromomethane <0.137 1.12 1.395 mg/Kg 0 125 57.150 2 21 MSD MSD Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 97 80.120 Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) 99 80_120 Toluene-d8(Surr) 100 80.120 Method: 8270D SIM -Semivolatile Organic Compound (GC/MS SIM LL) Lab Sample ID: MB 310-230933/1-A Client Sample ID: Method Blank Matrix:Water Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 230963 Prep Batch: 230933 MB MB Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Acenaphthene <0.100 0.100 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 18:50 1 Acenaphthylene <0.100 0.100 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 18:50 1 Anthracene <0.100 0.100 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 18:50 1 Benzo[a]anthracene <0.100 0.100 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 18:50 1 Benzo[a]pyrene <0.100 0.100 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 18:50 1 Benzo[b]fluoranthene <0.100 0.100 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 18:50 1 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene <0.100 0.100 ug/L 02/25/1914.38 02/26/19 18:50 1 Benzo[k]fluoranthene <0.100 0.100 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/1918:50 1 Chrysene <0.100 0.100 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 18:50 1 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene <0.100 0.100 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 18:50 1 Fluoranthene <0.100 0.100 ug/L 02/25/1914.38 02/26/19 18:50 1 Fluorene <0.100 0.100 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 18:50 1 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene <0.100 0.100 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 18:50 1 2-Methylnaphthalene <0.100 0.100 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 18:50 1 Naphthalene <0.500 0.500 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 18:50 1 Phenanthrene <0.100 0.100 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/1918:50 1 Pyrene <0.100 0.100 ug/L 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 18:50 1 MB MB Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 2-Fluorobiphenyl(Surr) 65 22_110 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 18:50 1 Nitrobenzene-d5(Surr) 69 17.116 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 18:50 1 Terphenyl-d14(Surr) 68 10.136 02/25/19 14:38 02/26/19 18:50 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 56 of 86 3/5/2019 QC Sample Results < Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID:310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: 8270D SIM -Semivolatile Organic Compound (GC/MS SIM LL) (Continued) Lab Sample ID: LCS 310-230933/2-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix:Water Prep Type:Total/NA Analysis Batch: 230963 Prep Batch: 230933 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Acenaphthene 2.00 1.242 ug/L 62 34_110 Acenaphthylene 2.00 1.287 ug/L 64 36_110 Anthracene 2.00 1.328 ug/L 66 42-110 Benzo[a]anthracene 2.00 1.435 ug/L 72 37.110 Benzo[a]pyrene 2.00 1.346 ug/L 67 36_111 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 2.00 1.363 ug/L 68 36_112 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 2.00 0.9375 ug/L 47 10_122 9 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 2.00 1.488 ug/L 74 37_110 Chrysene 2.00 1.652 ug/L 83 30_110 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 2.00 1.027 ug/L 51 10_122 Fluoranthene 2.00 1.414 ug/L 71 40_110 Fluorene 2.00 1.335 ug/L 67 30_110 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 2.00 1.189 ug/L 59 22_124 2-Methylnaphthalene 2.00 1.224 ug/L 61 35_110 Naphthalene 2.00 1.130 ug/L 56 32_110 5:hc',, Phenanthrene 2.00 1.238 ug/L 62 41_110 S`' r Pyrene 2.00 1.405 ug/L 70 39.110 LCS LCS Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits 2-Fluorobiphenyl(Surr) 57 22.110 Nitrobenzene-d5(Surr) 61 17.116 Terphenyl-d14(Surr) 64 10.136 Lab Sample ID: LCSD 310-230933/3-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Dup Matrix:Water Prep Type:Total/NA Analysis Batch:230963 Prep Batch: 230933 Spike LCSD LCSD %Rec. RPD Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits RPD Limit Acenaphthene 2.00 1.366 ug/L 68 34_110 10 35 Acenaphthylene 2.00 1.390 ug/L 70 36_110 8 35 Anthracene 2.00 1.392 ug/L 70 42_110 5 35 Benzo[a]anthracene 2.00 1.571 ug/L 79 37-110 9 35 Benzo[a]pyrene 2.00 1.475 ug/L 74 36_111 9 35 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 2.00 1.485 ug/L 74 36.112 9 35 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 2.00 1.196 ug/L 60 10.122 24 35 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 2.00 1.626 ug/L 81 37.110 9 35 Chrysene 2.00 1.806 ug/L 90 30_110 9 35 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 2.00 1.538 * ug/L 77 10_122 40 35 Fluoranthene 2.00 1.523 ug/L 76 40_110 7 35 Fluorene 2.00 1.447 ug/L 72 30_110 8 35 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 2.00 1.322 ug/L 66 22_124 11 35 2-Methylnaphthalene 2.00 1.341 ug/L 67 35_110 9 35 Naphthalene 2.00 1.248 ug/L 62 32.110 10 35 Phenanthrene 2.00 1.334 ug/L 67 41_110 7 35 Pyrene 2.00 1.549 ug/L 77 39_110 10 35 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 57 of 86 3/5/2019 QC Sample Results Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID:310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: 8270D SIM -Semivolatile Organic Compound (GC/MS SIM LL) (Continued) Lab Sample ID: LCSD 310-230933/3-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Dup Matrix:Water Prep Type:Total/NA Analysis Batch: 230963 Prep Batch: 230933 754 LCSD LCSD - i Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits 2-Fluorobiphenyl(Surr) 60 22-110 Nitrobenzene-d5(Surr) 64 17-116 Terphenyl-d14(Surr) 68 10-136 Lab Sample ID: MB 310-231031/1-A Client Sample ID: Method Blank Matrix:Solid Prep Type:Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231078 Prep Batch: 231031 9 MB MB Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Acenaphthene <0.00979 0.00979 mg/Kg 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 13:36 1 Acenaphthylene <0.00979 0.00979 mg/Kg 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 13:36 1 Anthracene <0.00979 0.00979 mg/Kg 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 13:36 1 Benzo[a]anthracene <0.00979 0.00979 mg/Kg 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 13:36 1 Benzo[a]pyrene <0.00979 0.00979 mg/Kg 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 13:36 1 Benzo[b]fluoranthene <0.00979 0.00979 mg/Kg 02/26/1914:11 02/27/1913:36 1 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene <0.00979 0.00979 mg/Kg 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 13:36 1 .'.r Benzo[k]fluoranthene <0.00979 0.00979 mg/Kg 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 13:36 1 Chrysene <0.00979 0.00979 mg/Kg 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 13:36 1 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene <0.00979 0.00979 mg/Kg 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 13:36 1 Fluoranthene <0.00979 0.00979 mg/Kg 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 13:36 1 Fluorene <0.00979 0.00979 mg/Kg 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 13:36 1 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene <0.00979 0.00979 mg/Kg 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 13:36 1 2-Methylnaphthalene <0.00979 0.00979 mg/Kg 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 13:36 1 Naphthalene <0.00979 0.00979 mg/Kg 02/26/1914:11 02/27/19 13:36 1 Phenanthrene <0.00979 0.00979 mg/Kg 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 13:36 1 Pyrene <0.00979 0.00979 mg/Kg 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 13:36 1 MB MB Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 2-Fluorobiphenyl(Surr) 58 28-110 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 13:36 1 Nitrobenzene-d5(Surr) 65 22-110 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 13:36 1 Terphenyl-d14(Surr) 63 26-110 02/26/19 14:11 02/27/19 13:36 1 Lab Sample ID: LCS 310-231031/2-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix: Solid Prep Type:Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231078 Prep Batch: 231031 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Acenaphthene 0.129 0.08426 mg/Kg 65 35_110 Acenaphthylene 0.129 0.08680 mg/Kg 67 33_110 Anthracene 0.129 0.09448 mg/Kg 73 37_110 Benzo[a]anthracene 0.129 0.1028 mg/Kg 80 35-110 Benzo[a]pyrene 0.129 0.09745 mg/Kg 76 36-110 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.129 0.09745 mg/Kg 76 33_110 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 0.129 0.09335 mg/Kg 72 15_110 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.129 0.1058 mg/Kg 82 37.110 Chrysene 0.129 0.1180 mg/Kg 91 27_110 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 0.129 0.1209 mg/Kg 94 22_116 Fluoranthene 0.129 0.09367 mg/Kg 73 35_110 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 58 of 86 3/5/2019 QC Sample Results Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: 8270D SIM -Semivolatile Organic Compound (GC/MS SIM LL) (Continued) Lab Sample ID: LCS 310-231031/2-A Client Sample ID:Lab Control Sample Matrix:Solid Prep Type:Total/NA Analysis Batch:231078 Prep Batch:231031 ii Spike LCS LCS %Rec. 6 Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Fluorene 0.129 0.08647 mg/Kg 67 32.110 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 0.129 0.09944 mg/Kg 77 30_110 2-Methylnaphthalene 0.129 0.07867 mg/Kg 61 27_110 Naphthalene 0.129 0.07672 mg/Kg 59 24_110 Phenanthrene 0.129 0.08678 mg/Kg 67 37_110 Pyrene 0.129 0.09557 mg/Kg 74 34_110 Q LCS LCS 9 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits 2-Fluorobiphenyl(Surr) 58 28_110 Nitrobenzene-d5(Surr) 63 22_110 Terphenyl-d14(Surr) 68 26.110 Lab Sample ID:310-149954-1 MS Client Sample ID: B-1 (5-10') Matrix:Soil Prep Type:Total/NA Analysis Batch:231078 Prep Batch: 231031 Sample Sample Spike MS MS %Rec. Analyte Result Qualifier Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Acenaphthene <0.0113 0.156 0.09984 mg/Kg 0 64 30_110 Acenaphthylene <0.0113 0.156 0.1050 mg/Kg 0 67 30_110 Anthracene <0.0113 0.156 0.1024 mg/Kg 0 66 23_116 Benzo[a]anthracene <0.0113 0.156 0.1158 mg/Kg 0 74 27_110 Benzo[a]pyrene <0.0113 0.156 0.1097 mg/Kg 0 70 28_110 Benzo[blfluoranthene <0.0113 0.156 0.1088 mg/Kg -0 70 21_117 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene <0.0113 0.156 0.1099 mg/Kg 0 70 10_114 Benzo[k]Fluoranthene <0.0113 0.156 0.1157 mg/Kg 0 74 27_111 Chrysene <0.0113 0.156 0.1309 mg/Kg 0 84 20_110 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene <0.0113 0.156 0.1383 mg/Kg 0 89 10-124 Fluoranthene <0.0113 0.156 0.1029 mg/Kg 0 66 17-122 Fluorene <0.0113 0.156 0.1014 mg/Kg 0 65 25_110 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene <0.0113 0.156 0.1153 mg/Kg 0 74 21-115 2-Methylnaphthalene <0.0113 0.156 0.09645 mg/Kg 0 62 27-110 Naphthalene <0.0113 0.156 0.09305 mg/Kg 0 60 24_110 Phenanthrene <0.0113 0.156 0.09684 mg/Kg o 62 14_124 Pyrene <0.0113 0.156 0.1020 mg/Kg 0 65 17_118 MS MS Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits 2-Fluorobiphenyl(Surr) 58 28-110 Nitrobenzene-d5(Surr) 64 22-110 Terphenyl-d14(Surr) 59 26_110 Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-1 MSD Client Sample ID: B-1 (5-10') Matrix:Soil Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231078 Prep Batch: 231031 Sample Sample Spike MSD MSD %Rec. RPD Analyte Result Qualifier Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits RPD Limit Acenaphthene <0.0113 0.151 0.1055 mg/Kg 0 70 30.110 6 40 Acenaphthylene <0.0113 0.151 0.1114 mg/Kg 0 74 30_110 6 40 Anthracene <0.0113 0.151 0.1062 mg/Kg 0 70 23_116 4 40 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 59 of 86 3/5/2019 QC Sample Results Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 illethod: 8270D SIM -Semivolatile Organic Compound (GC/MS SIM LL) (Continued) Lab Sample ID:310-149954-1 MSD Client Sample ID:B-1 (5-10') '; Matrix:Soil Prep Type:Total/NA Analysis Batch:231078 Prep Batch:231031 Sample Sample Spike MSD MSD %Rec. RPD Analyte Result Qualifier Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits RPD Limit Benzo[a]anthracene <0.0113 0.151 0.1171 mg/Kg 0 78 27.110 1 40 Benzo[a]pyrene <0.0113 0.151 0.1104 mg/Kg 0 73 28_110 1 40 Benzo[b]fluoranthene <0.0113 0.151 0.1075 mg/Kg 3 71 21_117 1 40 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene <0.0113 0.151 0.1101 mg/Kg 0 73 10_114 0 40 Benzo[k]fluoranthene <0.0113 0.151 0.1176 mg/Kg o 78 27_111 2 40 Chrysene <0.0113 0.151 0.1318 mg/Kg 0 87 20_110 1 40 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene <0.0113 0.151 0.1404 mg/Kg 0 93 10.124 1 40 9 Fluoranthene <0.0113 0.151 0.1032 mg/Kg 0 68 17_122 0 40 v Fluorene <0.0113 0.151 0.1068 mg/Kg 3 71 25_110 5 40 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene <0.0113 0.151 0.1159 mg/Kg a 77 21_115 0 40 2-Methylnaphthalene <0.0113 0.151 0.1014 mg/Kg # 67 27-110 5 40 Naphthalene <0.0113 0.151 0.09616 mg/Kg 0 64 24.110 3 40 Phenanthrene <0.0113 0.151 0.09978 mg/Kg * 66 14_124 3 40 Pyrene <0.0113 0.151 0.1031 mg/Kg # 68 17_118 1 40 MSD MSD `' Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits 2-Fluorobiphenyl(Surr) 61 28-110 Nitrobenzene-d5(Surr) 67 22_110 Terphenyl-d14(Surr) 63 26-110 lethod: WI-GRO -Wisconsin - Gasoline Range Organics (GC) Lab Sample ID:MB 310-230907/4 Client Sample ID: Method Blank Matrix:Water Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 230907 MB MB Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Wisconsin GRO <100 100 ug/L 02/25/19 12:52 1 MB MB Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 93 80.120 02/25/19 12:52 1 Lab Sample ID: LCS 310-230907/5 Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix:Water Prep Type:Total/NA Analysis Batch: 230907 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Wisconsin GRO 800 767.0 ug/L 96 80_120 LCS LCS Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 96 80_120 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 60 of 86 3/5/2019 QC Sample Results Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: WI-GRO -Wisconsin -Gasoline Range Organics (GC) (Continued) Lab Sample ID: LCSD 310-230907/29 Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Dup Matrix:Water Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 230907 Spike LCSD LCSD %Rec. RPD Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits RPD Limit Wisconsin GRO 800 771.8 ug/L 96 80_120 1 20 LCSD LCSD Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 96 80_120 Lab Sample ID: MB 310-230926/1-A Client Sample ID: Method Blank 9 Matrix:Solid Prep Type:Total/NA Analysis Batch: 230905 Prep Batch: 230926 MB MB Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Oil Fac Wisconsin GRO <9.85 9.85 mg/Kg 02/25/19 10:08 02/25/19 11:52 1 MB MB Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 91 80_120 02/25/19 10:08 02/25/19 11:52 1 Vis. :. Lab Sample ID: LCS 310-230926/2-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 230905 Prep Batch: 230926 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Wisconsin GRO 39.9 44.70 mg/Kg 112 80_120 LCS LCS Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 101 80.120 Lab Sample ID: LCSD 310-230926/25-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Dup Matrix: Solid Prep Type:Total/NA Analysis Batch: 230905 Prep Batch:230926 Spike LCSD LCSD %Rec. RPD Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits RPD Limit Wisconsin GRO 38.7 40.17 mg/Kg 104 80_120 11 20 LCSD LCSD Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 100 80.120 Method: 8082A - Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) by Gas Chromatography Lab Sample ID: MB 310-231032/1-A Client Sample ID: Method Blank Matrix: Solid Prep Type:Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231234 Prep Batch: 231032 MB MB Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac PCB-1016 <0.0486 0.0486 mg/Kg 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 15:14 1 PCB-1221 <0.0486 0.0486 mg/Kg 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 15:14 1 PCB-1232 <0.0486 0.0486 mg/Kg 02/26/1914:18 02/28/19 15:14 1 PCB-1242 <0.0486 0.0486 mg/Kg 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 15:14 1 PCB-1248 <0 0486 0.0486 mg/Kg 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 15:14 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 61 of 86 3/5/2019 QC Sample Results Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 nethod: 8082A - Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) by Gas Chromatography (Continued) Lab Sample ID: MB 310-231032/1-A Client Sample ID: Method Blank Matrix:Solid Prep Type:Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231234 Prep Batch: 231032 .] MB MB . r: Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac PCB-1254 <0.0486 0.0486 mg/Kg 02/26/1914:18 02/28/1915:14 1 PCB-1260 <0.0486 0.0486 mg/Kg 02/26/1914:18 02/28/1915:14 1 PCB-1268 <0.0486 0.0486 mg/Kg 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 15:14 1 Polychlorinated biphenyls,Total <0.0486 0.0486 mg/Kg 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 15:14 1 MB MB Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac DCB Decachlorobiphenyl(Surr) 117 X 10.110 02/26/19 14:18 02/28/19 15:14 1 Tetrachloro-m-xylene 110 10.110 02/26/1914:18 02/28/1915:14 1 Lab Sample ID: LCS 310-231032/2-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix:Solid Prep Type:Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231425 Prep Batch: 231032 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits PCB-1016 0.326 0.2749 mg/Kg 84 30_110 PCB-1260 0.326 0.2945 mg/Kg 90 24.110 LCS LCS Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits DCB Decachlorobiphenyl(Surr) 94 10.110 Tetrachloro-m-xylene 89 10_110 Method: WI-DRO -Wisconsin - Diesel Range Organics (GC) Lab Sample ID: MB 310-230909/1-A Client Sample ID: Method Blank Matrix:Solid Prep Type: Silica Gel Cleanup Analysis Batch: 231057 Prep Batch: 230909 MB MB Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Diesel Range Organics(DRO) <6.87 6.87 mg/Kg 02/25/19 11:56 02/27/19 12:02 1 Lab Sample ID: LCS 310-230909/2-A Client Sample ID:Lab Control Sample Matrix:Solid Prep Type:Silica Gel Cleanup Analysis Batch: 231057 Prep Batch:230909 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Diesel Range Organics(DRO) 99.3 75.28 mg/Kg 76 70.120 Lab Sample ID: LCSD 310-230909/3-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Dup Matrix:Solid Prep Type:Silica Gel Cleanup Analysis Batch:231057 Prep Batch: 230909 Spike LCSD LCSD %Rec. RPD Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits RPD Limit Diesel Range Organics(DRO) 97.6 91.00 mg/Kg 93 70_120 19 20 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 62 of 86 3/5/2019 QC Sample Results Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: WI-DRO -Wisconsin - Diesel Range Organics (GC) (Continued) Lab Sample ID:MB 310-230972/1-A Client Sample ID:Method Blank Matrix:Water Prep Type:Silica Gel Cleanup Analysis Batch: 231284 Prep Batch: 230972 MB MB Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Diesel Range Organics(DRO) <0.100 0.100 mg/L 02/26/19 08:45 03/01/19 08:15 1 Lab Sample ID: LCS 310-230972/2-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix:Water Prep Type:Silica Gel Cleanup Analysis Batch: 231284 Prep Batch:230972 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits 9 Diesel Range Organics(DRO) 2.50 1.938 mg/L 78 75.115 Lab Sample ID: LCSD 310-230972/3-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Dup Matrix:Water Prep Type:Silica Gel Cleanup Analysis Batch: 231284 Prep Batch:230972 Spike LCSD LCSD %Rec. RPD Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits RPD Limit Diesel Range Organics(DRO) 2.50 1.703 ' mg/L 68 75_115 13 20 ,_:. Method: 6010D - Metals (ICP) Lab Sample ID: MB 310-230938/1-A Client Sample ID: Method Blank Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231118 Prep Batch: 230938 MB MB Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Arsenic <3.80 3.80 mg/Kg 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 17:19 1 Barium <0.951 0.951 mg/Kg 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 17:19 1 Cadmium <0.951 0.951 mg/Kg 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 17:19 1 Chromium <0.951 0.951 mg/Kg 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 17:19 1 Lead <4.75 4.75 mg/Kg 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 17:19 1 Selenium <7.13 7.13 mg/Kg 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 17:19 1 Silver <0 951 0.951 mg/Kg 02/26/19 08:00 02/26/19 17:19 1 Lab Sample ID: LCS 310-230938/2-A Client Sample ID:Lab Control Sample Matrix: Solid Prep Type:Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231118 Prep Batch:230938 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Arsenic 191 192.6 mg/Kg 101 80_120 Barium 95.5 90.92 mg/Kg 95 80_120 Cadmium 95.5 92.78 mg/Kg 97 80.120 Chromium 95.5 94.18 mg/Kg 99 80.120 Lead 191 186.4 mg/Kg 98 80.120 Selenium 382 365.1 mg/Kg 96 80_120 Silver 95.5 97.74 mg/Kg 102 80-120 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 63 of 86 3/5/2019 QC Sample Results Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: 6020B - Metals (ICP/MS) Lab Sample ID: MB 310-230964/1-A Client Sample ID: Method Blank Matrix:Water Prep Type:Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231551 Prep Batch: 230964 4 $'i MB MB Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Oil Fac Arsenic <0.00200 0.00200 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/04/19 16:09 1 Barium <0.00200 0.00200 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/04/19 16:09 1 Cadmium <0.000500 0.000500 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/04/19 16:09 1 Chromium <0.00500 0.00500 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/04/19 16:09 1 Lead <0 000500 0.000500 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/04/19 16:09 1 Selenium <0 00500 0.00500 mg/L 02/26/19 08:02 03/04/19 16:09 1 Silver <0.00100 0.00100 mg/L 02/26/19 08.02 03/04/19 16:09 1 9 Lab Sample ID: LCS 310-230964/2-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix:Water Prep Type:Total/NA Analysis Batch:231551 Prep Batch: 230964 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Arsenic 0.0400 0.04304 mg/L 108 80.120 Barium 0.0400 0.04157 mg/L 104 80.1201"" Cadmium 0.0200 0.02159 mg/L 108 80_120 Chromium 0.0400 0.04092 mg/L 102 80_120 Lead 0.0200 0.02197 mg/L 110 80_120 Selenium 0.0400 0.04106 mg/L 103 80.120 Silver 0.0200 0.02103 mg/L 105 80.120 Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-10 DU Client Sample ID: B-4 Matrix: Ground Water Prep Type: Dissolved Analysis Batch: 231416 Prep Batch: 230964 Sample Sample DU DU RPD Analyte Result Qualifier Result Qualifier Unit D RPD Limit Arsenic 0.00253 0.002974 mg/L 16 20 Barium 0.207 0.2305 mg/L 11 20 Cadmium <0.000500 <0.000500 mg/L NC 20 Chromium <0.00500 <0.00500 mg/L NC 20 Lead <0.000500 <0.000500 mg/L NC 20 Selenium <0.00500 <0.00500 mg/L NC 20 Silver <0.00100 <0.00100 mg/L NC 20 Method: 7470A - Mercury (CVAA) Lab Sample ID: MB 310-230990/1-A Client Sample ID: Method Blank Matrix:Water Prep Type:Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231182 Prep Batch: 230990 MB MB Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Mercury <0.000200 0.000200 mg/L 02/26/19 09:33 02/27/19 15:29 1 Lab Sample ID: LCS 310-230990/2-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix:Water Prep Type:Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231182 Prep Batch: 230990 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. lnalyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Mercury 0.00167 0.001699 mg/L 102 80_120 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 64 of 86 3/5/2019 QC Sample Results Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: 7471B - Mercury (CVAA) Lab Sample ID:MB 310-230824/1-A Client Sample ID: Method Blank Matrix:Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231136 Prep Batch: 230824 MB MB Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Mercury <0.0196 0.0196 mg/Kg 02/26/19 10:00 02/27/19 12:06 1 Lab Sample ID: LCS 310-230824/2-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix:Solid Prep Type:Total/NA Analysis Batch:231136 Prep Batch:230824 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits 9 Mercury 0.162 0.1916 mg/Kg 118 80.120 Method: Moisture- Percent Moisture Lab Sample ID:310-149954-2 DU Client Sample ID: B-2(15-20') Matrix:Soil Prep Type:Total/NA Analysis Batch:230908 Sample Sample DU DU RPD Analyte Result Qualifier Result Qualifier Unit D RPD Limit Percent Moisture 16.5 18.3 % 11 20 Percent Solids 83.5 81.7 % 2 20 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 65 of 86 3/5/2019 QC Association Summary } 4 Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 GC/MS VOA Analysis Batch: 230851 °" Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-149954-7 Trip Blank Total/NA Water 8260B 0 310-149954-8 0-2 Total/NA Ground Water 8260B ft 310-149954-9 B-3 Total/NA Ground Water 82600 310-149954-10 B-4 Total/NA Ground Water 8260B 310-149954-11 B-5 Total/NA Ground Water 82600 MB 310-230851/8 Method Blank Total/NA Water 82600 LCS 310-230851/6 Lab Control Sample Total/NA Water 8260B LCS 310-230851/7 Lab Control Sample Total/NA Water 8260B Prep Batch: 231050 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-149954-1 B-1(5-10') Total/NA Soil 5035 10 310-149954-2 B-2(15-20) Total/NA Soil 5035 310-149954-3 B-3(12.5-15) Total/NA Soil 5035 310-149954-4 B-4(12.5-15') Total/NA Soil 5035 310-149954-5 B-5(20-22.5) Total/NA Soil 5035 310-149954-6 Trip Blank Total/NA Soil 5035 MB 310-231050/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Solid 5035 t `. LCS 310-231050/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Solid 5035 ii,-*. 310-149954-2 MS B-2(15-20') Total/NA Soil 5035 310-149954-2 MSD B-2(15-20') Total/NA Soil 5035 knalysis Batch:231052 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-149954-1 6-1 (5-10) Total/NA Soil 8260B 231050 310-149954-2 B-2(15-20') Total/NA Soil 8260B 231050 310-149954-3 B-3(12.5-15') Total/NA Soil 8260B 231050 310-149954-4 B-4(12.5-15') Total/NA Soil 82600 231050 310-149954-5 B-5(20-22.5) Total/NA Soil 8260B 231050 310-149954-6 Trip Blank Total/NA Soil 8260B 231050 MB 310-231050/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Solid 8260B 231050 LCS 310-231050/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Solid 82606 231050 310-149954-2 MS B-2(15-20) Total/NA Soil 8260B 231050 310-149954-2 MSD B-2(15-20) Total/NA Soil 8260B 231050 GC/MS Semi VOA Prep Batch: 230933 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-149954-8 0-2 Total/NA Ground Water 3510C 310-149954-9 B-3 Total/NA Ground Water 3510C 310-149954-10 B-4 Total/NA Ground Water 3510C 310-149954-11 B-5 Total/NA Ground Water 3510C MB 310-230933/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Water 3510C LCS 310-230933/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Water 3510C LCSD 310-230933/3-A Lab Control Sample Dup Total/NA Water 3510C Analysis Batch:230963 FLab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-149954-8 B-2 Total/NA Ground Water 8270D SIM 230933 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 66 of 86 3/5/2019 QC Association Summary Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 GC/MS Semi VOA(Continued) Analysis Batch:230963(Continued) Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-149954-9 0-3 Total/NA Ground Water 8270D SIM 230933 310-149954-10 B-4 Total/NA Ground Water 8270D SIM 230933 ''111,-, 310-149954-11 B-5 Total/NA Ground Water 8270D SIM 230933 MB 310-230933/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Water 8270D SIM 230933 LCS 310-230933/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Water 8270D SIM 230933 LCSD 310-230933/3-A Lab Control Sample Dup Total/NA Water 8270D SIM 230933 Prep Batch; 231031 i Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-149954-1 0-1 (5-10') Total/NA Soil 3546 310-149954-2 0-2(15-20') Total/NA Soil 3546 310-149954-3 B-3(12.5-15') Total/NA Soil 3546 1 0 310-149954-4 B-4(12.5-15') Total/NA Soil 3546 310-149954-5 B-5(20-22.5') Total/NA Soil 3546 MB 310-231031/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Solid 3546 LCS 310-231031/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Solid 3546 310-149954-1 MS B-1(5-10') Total/NA Soil 3546 310-149954-1 MSD B-1(5-10') Total/NA Soil 3546 1, Analysis Batch:231078 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-149954-1 B-1(5-10') Total/NA Soil 8270D SIM 231031 310-149954-2 B-2(15-20') Total/NA Soil 8270D SIM 231031 310-149954-3 B-3(12.5-15') Total/NA Soil 8270D SIM 231031 310-149954-4 B-4(12.5-15') Total/NA Soil 8270D SIM 231031 310-149954-5 B-5(20-22.5') Total/NA Soil 8270D SIM 231031 MB 310-231031/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Solid 8270D SIM 231031 LCS 310-231031/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Solid 8270D SIM 231031 310-149954-1 MS B-1 (5-10') Total/NA Soil 8270D SIM 231031 310-149954-1 MSD 0-1(5-10') Total/NA Soil 8270D SIM 231031 GC VOA Analysis Batch:230905 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-149954-1 B-1 (5-10') Total/NA Soil WI-GRO 230926 310-149954-2 B-2(15-20') Total/NA Soil WI-GRO 230926 310-149954-3 B-3(12.5-15') Total/NA Soil WI-GRO 230926 310-149954-4 B-4(12.5-15') Total/NA Soil WI-GRO 230926 310-149954-5 B-5(20-22.5') Total/NA Soil WI-GRO 230926 310-149954-6 Trip Blank Total/NA Soil WI-GRO 230926 MB 310-230926/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Solid WI-GRO 230926 LCS 310-230926/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Solid WI-GRO 230926 LCSD 310-230926/25-A Lab Control Sample Dup Total/NA Solid WI-GRO 230926 Analysis Batch:230907 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-149954-7 Trip Blank Total/NA Water WI-GRO 310-149954-8 B-2 Total/NA Ground Water WI-GRO 310-149954-9 B-3 Total/NA Ground Water \M-GRO TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 67 of 86 3/5/2019 QC Association Summary Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 GC VOA(Continued) Analysis Batch: 230907(Continued) Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-149954-10 8-4 Total/NA Ground Water WI-GRO ' 310-149954-11 B-5 Total/NA Ground Water WI-GRO MB 310-230907/4 Method Blank Total/NA Water WI-GRO LCS 310-230907/5 Lab Control Sample Total/NA Water WI-GRO LCSD 310-230907/29 Lab Control Sample Dup Total/NA Water WI-GRO Prep Batch: 230926 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-149954-1 B-1(5-10') Total/NA Soil WI GRO 310-149954-2 0-2(15-20') Total/NA Soil WI GRO 310-149954-3 B-3(12.5-15') Total/NA Soil WI GRO 310-149954-4 B-4(12.5-15') Total/NA Soil WI GRO 10 310-149954-5 B-5(20-22.5') Total/NA Soil WI GRO 310-149954-6 Trip Blank Total/NA Soil WI GRO MB 310-230926/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Solid 5035 LCS 310-230926/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Solid 5035 LCSD 310-230926/25-A Lab Control Sample Dup Total/NA Solid 5035 GC Semi VOA Prep Batch:230909 F Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-149954-1 B-1 (5-10') Silica Gel Cleanup Soil WI DRO PREP 310-149954-2 B-2(15-20') Silica Gel Cleanup Soil WI DRO PREP 310-149954-3 B-3(12.5-15') Silica Gel Cleanup Soil WI DRO PREP 310-149954-4 B-4(12.5-15') Silica Gel Cleanup Soil WI DRO PREP 310-149954-5 B-5(20-22.5') Silica Gel Cleanup Soil WI DRO PREP MB 310-230909/1-A Method Blank Silica Gel Cleanup Solid WI DRO PREP LCS 310-230909/2-A Lab Control Sample Silica Gel Cleanup Solid WI DRO PREP LCSD 310-230909/3-A Lab Control Sample Dup Silica Gel Cleanup Solid WI DRO PREP Prep Batch:230972 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-149954-8 B-2 Silica Gel Cleanup Ground Water 3510C SGC 310-149954-9 B-3 Silica Gel Cleanup Ground Water 3510C SGC 310-149954-10 B-4 Silica Gel Cleanup Ground Water 3510C SGC 310-149954-11 B-5 Silica Gel Cleanup Ground Water 3510C SGC MB 310-230972/1-A Method Blank Silica Gel Cleanup Water 3510C LCS 310-230972/2-A Lab Control Sample Silica Gel Cleanup Water 3510C LCSD 310-230972/3-A Lab Control Sample Dup Silica Gel Cleanup Water 3510C Prep Batch: 231032 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-149954-1 B-1(5-10') Total/NA Soil 3546 310-149954-2 B-2(15-20') Total/NA Soil 3546 310-149954-3 B-3(12.5-15') Total/NA Soil 3546 310-149954-4 B-4(12.5-15') Total/NA Soil 3546 310-149954-5 B-5(20-22.5') Total/NA Soil 3546 MB 310-231032/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Solid 3546 LCS 310-231032/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Solid 3546 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 68 of 86 3/5/2019 QC Association Summary Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 GC Semi VOA (Continued) Analysis Batch:231057 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch , , 310-149954-1 B-1(5-10') Silica Gel Cleanup Soil Wa. VVI-DRO 230909 P§ 310-149954-2 B-2(15-20') Silica Gel Cleanup Soil WI-DRO 230909 310-149954-3 B-3(12.5-15') Silica Gel Cleanup Soil WI-DRO 230909 310-149954-4 B-4(12.5-15') Silica Gel Cleanup Soil WI-DRO 230909 310-149954-5 0-5(20-22.5') Silica Gel Cleanup Soil WI-DRO 230909 MB 310-230909/1-A Method Blank Silica Gel Cleanup Solid WI-DRO 230909 LCS 310-230909/2-A Lab Control Sample Silica Gel Cleanup Solid WI-DRO 230909 LCSD 310-230909/3-A Lab Control Sample Dup Silica Gel Cleanup Solid WI-DRO 230909 Analysis Batch: 231234 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch O 310-149954-1 B-1(5-10') Total/NA Soil 8082A 231032 310-149954-2 B-2(15-20') Total/NA Soil 8082A 231032 310-149954-3 B-3(12.5-15') Total/NA Soil 8082A 231032 310-149954-4 B-4(12.5-15') Total/NA Soil 8082A 231032 310-149954-5 B-5(20-22.5') Total/NA Soil 8082A 231032 MB 310-231032/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Solid 8082A 231032 ................ Analysis Batch: 231284 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-149954-8 B-2 Silica Gel Cleanup Ground Water WI-DRO 230972 310-149954-9 B-3 Silica Gel Cleanup Ground Water WI-DRO 230972 310-149954-10 B-4 Silica Gel Cleanup Ground Water WI-DRO 230972 310-149954-11 B-5 Silica Gel Cleanup Ground Water WI-DRO 230972 MB 310-230972/1-A Method Blank Silica Gel Cleanup Water WI-DRO 230972 LCS 310-230972/2-A Lab Control Sample Silica Gel Cleanup Water WI-DRO 230972 LCSD 310-230972/3-A Lab Control Sample Dup Silica Gel Cleanup Water WI-DRO 230972 Analysis Batch: 231329 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-149954-3 B-3(12.5-15') Total/NA Soil 8082A 231032 Analysis Batch: 231336 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-149954-2 B-2(15-20') Total/NA Soil 8082A 231032 310-149954-3 B-3(12.5-15') Total/NA Soil 8082A 231032 310-149954-4 B-4(12.5-15') Total/NA Soil 8082A 231032 310-149954-4 B-4(12.5-15') Total/NA Soil 8082A 231032 310-149954-5 B-5(20-22.5') Total/NA Soil 8082A 231032 310-149954-5 B-5(20-22.5') Total/NA Soil 8082A 231032 Analysis Batch:231425 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch LCS 310-231032/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Solid 8082A 231032 Metals Prep Batch:230824 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-149954-1 0-1(5-10') Total/NA Soil 74710 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 69 of 86 3/5/2019 QC Association Summary Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID:310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Jletals (Continued) Prep Batch:230824(Continued) Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch , 310-149954-2 B-2(15-20') Total/NA Soil 7471B 310-149954-3 B-3(12.5-15') Total/NA Soil 7471B ' ' 310-149954-4 B-4(12.5-15') Total/NA Soil 7471B 310-149954-5 B-5(20-22.5') Total/NA Soil 7471B MB 310-230824/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Solid 7471B LCS 310-230824/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Solid 7471B Prep Batch: 230938 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-149954-1 B-1(5-10') Total/NA Soil 3050B 310-149954-2 0-2(15-20') Total/NA Soil 3050B 310-149954-3 B-3(12.5-15') Total/NA Soil 3050B 1 0 310-149954-4 B-4(12.5-15') Total/NA Soil 3050B 310-149954-5 B-5(20-22.5') Total/NA Soil 3050B MB 310-230938/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Solid 3050B LCS 310-230938/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Solid 3050B Prep Batch: 230964 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-149954-8 B-2 Dissolved Ground Water 3010A 310-149954-9 B-3 Dissolved Ground Water 3010A 310-149954-10 B-4 Dissolved Ground Water 3010A 310-149954-11 0-5 Dissolved Ground Water 3010A MB 310-230964/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Water 3010A LCS 310-230964/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Water 3010A 310-149954-10 DU B-4 Dissolved Ground Water 3010A Prep Batch:230990 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-149954-8 B-2 Dissolved Ground Water 7470A 310-149954-9 B-3 Dissolved Ground Water 7470A 310-149954-10 B-4 Dissolved Ground Water 7470A 310-149954-11 B-5 Dissolved Ground Water 7470A MB 310-230990/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Water 7470A LCS 310-230990/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Water 7470A Analysis Batch: 231118 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-149954-1 B-1 (5-10') Total/NA Soil 6010D 230938 310-149954-2 B-2(15-20') Total/NA Soil 6010D 230938 310-149954-3 0-3(12.5-15') Total/NA Soil 6010D 230938 310-149954-4 B-4(12.5-15') Total/NA Soil 6010D 230938 310-149954-5 B-5(20-22.5') Total/NA Soil 6010D 230938 MB 310-230938/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Solid 6010D 230938 LCS 310-230938/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Solid 6010D 230938 Analysis Batch: 231136 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-149954-1 B-1 (5-10') Total/NA Soil 74710 230824 310-149954-2 B-2(15-20') Total/NA Soil 7471B 230824 310-149954-3 0-3(12 5-15') Total/NA Soil 74718 230824 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 70 of 86 3/5/2019 QC Association Summary Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Metals (Continued) Analysis Batch:231136(Continued) Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-149954-4 B-4(12.5-15') Total/NA Soil 7471B 230824Ss c. 310-149954-5 B-5(20-22.5') Total/NA Soil 7471B 230824 4"0 - MB 310-230824/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Solid 7471B 230824 LCS 310-230824/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Solid 7471B 230824 Analysis Batch: 231182 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch "=s 310-149954-8 5-2 Dissolved Ground Water 7470A 230990 ' 310-149954-9 13-3 Dissolved Ground Water 7470A 230990 310-149954-10 B-4 Dissolved Ground Water 7470A 230990 310-149954-11 B-5 Dissolved Ground Water 7470A 230990 /� MB 310-230990/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Water 7470A 230990 10 LCS 310-230990/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Water 7470A 230990 Analysis Batch: 231416 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-149954-8 B-2 Dissolved Ground Water 6020B 230964 310-149954-9 B-3 Dissolved Ground Water 6020B 230964 -'7 g a ' 310-149954-10 B-4 Dissolved Ground Water 6020B 230964 r>"... 310-149954-11 B-5 Dissolved Ground Water 6020B 230964 310-149954-10 DU B-4 Dissolved Ground Water 6020B 230964 Analysis Batch: 231551 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch MB 310-230964/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Water 6020B 230964 LCS 310-230964/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Water 6020B 230964 General Chemistry Analysis Batch:230908 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-149954-1 B-1 (5-10') Total/NA Soil Moisture 310-149954-2 B-2(15-20') Total/NA Soil Moisture 310-149954-3 B-3(12.5-15') Total/NA Soil Moisture 310-149954-4 B-4(12.5-15') Total/NA Soil Moisture 310-149954-5 B-5(20-22.5') Total/NA Soil Moisture 310-149954-2 DU B-2(15-20') Total/NA Soil Moisture TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 71 of 86 3/5/2019 Lab Chronicle Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-1 (5-10') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-1 Date Collected:02/21/19 11:30 Matrix:Soil Date Received:02/23/19 09:30 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Labrill:7i Total/NA Analysis Moisture 1 230908 02/25/19 11:27 WJF TAL CF Client Sample ID: B-1 (5-10') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-1 Date Collected: 02/21/19 11:30 Matrix:Soil Date Received:02/23/19 09:30 Percent Solids:84.9 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Prep 5035 231050 02/27/19 05:39 TCH TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8260B 1 231052 02/27/19 10:22 TCH TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3546 231031 02/26/19 14:11 EAM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8270D SIM 1 231078 02/27/19 15:26 DMD TAL CF Total/NA Prep WI GRO 230926 02/25/19 10:08 CMM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis WI-GRO 1 230905 02/25/19 14:45 DLK TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3546 231032 02/26/19 14:18 EAM TAL CF . , Total/NA Analysis 8082A 1 231234 02/28/19 16:08 BBW TAL CF _'• Silica Gel Cleanup Prep WI DRO PREP 230909 02/25/19 11:56 EAM TAL CF Silica Gel Cleanup Analysis WI-DRO 1 231057 02/27/19 12:27 JTA TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3050B 230938 02/26/19 08:00 JNR TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 6010D 2 231118 02/26/19 18:35 CTB TAL CF Total/NA Prep 7471B 230824 02/26/19 10:00 JNR TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 7471B 1 231136 02/27/19 12:35 JNR TAL CF Client Sample ID: B-2 (15-20') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-2 Date Collected:02/21/19 12:20 Matrix:Soil Date Received:02/23/19 09:30 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis Moisture 1 230908 02/25/19 11:27 WJF TAL CF Client Sample ID: B-2 (15-20') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-2 Date Collected:02/21/19 12:20 Matrix:Soil Date Received:02/23/19 09:30 Percent Solids:83.5 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Prep 5035 231050 02/27/19 05:39 TCH TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 82600 1 231052 02/27/19 10:46 TCH TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3546 231031 02/26/19 14:11 EAM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8270D SIM 10 231078 02/27/19 15:45 DMD TAL CF Total/NA Prep WI GRO 230926 02/25/19 10:08 CMM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis WI-GRO 1 230905 02/25/19 15:16 DLK TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3546 231032 02/26/19 14:18 EAM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8082A 1 231234 02/28/19 16:19 BBW TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3546 231032 02/26/19 14:18 EAM TAL CF TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 72 of 86 3/5/2019 Lab Chronicle Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-2 (15-20') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-2 Date Collected:02/21/19 12:20 Matrix:Soil Date Received:02/23/19 09:30 Percent Solids:83.5 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis 8082A 50 231336 03/01/19 15:11 BBW TAL CF Silica Gel Cleanup Prep WI DRO PREP 230909 02/25/19 11 56 EAM TAL CF Silica Gel Cleanup Analysis WI-DRO 1 231057 02/27/19 12:40 JTA TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3050B 230938 02/26/19 08:00 JNR TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 6010D 2 231118 02/26/19 18:37 CTB TAL CF =; Total/NA Prep 7471B 230824 02/26/19 08:52 JNR TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 7471B 1 231136 02/27/19 12:38 JNR TAL CF Client Sample ID: B-3 (12.5-15') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-3 Date Collected: 02/21/19 13:30 Matrix:Soil Date Received:02/23/19 09:30 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis Moisture 1 230908 02/25/19 11:27 WJF TAL CF '. Client Sample ID: B-3 (12.5-15') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-3 Date Collected:02/21/19 13:30 Matrix: Soil Date Received:02/23/19 09:30 Percent Solids:72.1 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Prep 5035 231050 02/27/19 05:39 TCH TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8260B 1 231052 02/27/19 11:10 TCH TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3546 231031 02/26/19 14:11 EAM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8270D SIM 10 231078 02/27/19 16:21 DMD TAL CF Total/NA Prep WI GRO 230926 02/25/19 10:08 CMM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis WI-GRO 1 230905 02/25/19 15:47 DLK TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3546 231032 02/26/19 14:18 EAM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8082A 5 231329 03/01/19 17:23 BBW TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3546 231032 02/26/19 14:18 EAM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8082A 1 231234 02/28/19 16:30 BBW TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3546 231032 02/26/19 14:18 EAM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8082A 100 231336 03/01/19 15:21 BBW TAL CF Silica Gel Cleanup Prep WI DRO PREP 230909 02/25/19 11:56 EAM TAL CF Silica Gel Cleanup Analysis WI-DRO 10 231057 02/27/19 12:52 JTA TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3050B 230938 02/26/19 08:00 JNR TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 6010D 3 231118 02/26/19 18:39 CTB TAL CF Total/NA Prep 74710 230824 02/26/19 08:52 JNR TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 7471B 1 231136 02/27/19 12:44 JNR TAL CF TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 73 of 86 3/5/2019 Lab Chronicle Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID:310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-4(12.5-15') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-4 Date Collected:02/21/19 15:00 Matrix:Soil Date Received:02/23/19 09:30 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared a Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis Moisture 1 230908 02/25/19 11:27 WJF TAL CF Client Sample ID: B-4 (12.5-15') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-4 Date Collected: 02/21/19 15:00 Matrix:Soil Date Received:02/23/19 09:30 Percent Solids:69.7 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Prep 5035 231050 02/27/19 05:39 TCH TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8260B 1 231052 02/27/19 11:34 TCH TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3546 231031 02/26/19 14:11 EAM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8270D SIM 10 231078 02/27/19 16:58 DMD TAL CF Total/NA Prep WI GRO 230926 02/25/19 10:08 CMM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis WI-GRO 1 230905 02/25/19 16:25 DLK TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3546 231032 02/26/19 14:18 EAM TAL CF ,',.;,,,,,, Total/NA Analysis 8082A 1 231234 02/28/19 16:41 BBW TAL CF 4 Total/NA Prep 3546 231032 02/26/19 14:18 EAM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8082A 25 231336 03/01/19 15:43 BBW TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3546 231032 02/26/19 14:18 EAM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8082A 1 231336 03/01/19 15:54 BBW TAL CF Silica Gel Cleanup Prep WI DRO PREP 230909 02/25/19 11:56 EAM TAL CF Silica Gel Cleanup Analysis WI-DRO 1 231057 02/27/19 13:05 JTA TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3050B 230938 02/26/19 08:00 JNR TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 6010D 2 231118 02/26/19 18:40 CTB TAL CF Total/NA Prep 7471B 230824 02/26/19 08:52 JNR TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 7471B 1 231136 02/27/19 12:46 JNR TAL CF Client Sample ID: B-5 (20-22.5') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-5 Date Collected:02/21/19 16:20 Matrix:Soil Date Received:02/23/19 09:30 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis Moisture 1 230908 02/25/19 11:27 WJF TAL CF Client Sample ID: B-5(20-22.5') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-5 Date Collected:02/21/19 16:20 Matrix:Soil Date Received:02/23/19 09:30 Percent Solids:44.9 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Prep 5035 231050 02/27/19 05:39 TCH TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8260B 1 231052 02/27/19 11:59 TCH TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3546 231031 02/26/19 14:11 EAM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8270D SIM 10 231078 02/27/19 17:35 DMD TAL CF Total/NA Prep WI GRO 230926 02/25/19 10:08 CMM TAL CF TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 74 of 86 3/5/2019 Lab Chronicle Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-5 (20-22.5') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-5 Date Collected: 02/21/19 16:20 Matrix:Soil Date Received:02/23/19 09:30 Percent Solids:44.9 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab , ,t- Total/NA tTotal/NA Analysis WI-GRO 1 230905 02/25/19 16:56 DLK TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3546 231032 02/26/19 14:18 EAM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8082A 1 231234 02/28/19 16:51 BBW TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3546 231032 02/26/19 14:18 EAM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8082A 100 231336 03/01/19 16:05 BBW TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3546 231032 02/26/19 14:18 EAM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8082A 1 231336 03/01/19 16:15 BBW TAL CF Silica Gel Cleanup Prep WI DRO PREP 230909 02/25/19 11:56 EAM TAL CF Silica Gel Cleanup Analysis WI-DRO 2 231057 02/27/19 13:17 JTA TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3050B 230938 02/26/19 08:00 JNR TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 6010D 2 231118 02/26/19 18:42 CTB TAL CF Total/NA Prep 7471B 230824 02/26/19 08:52 JNR TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 7471B 10 231136 02/27/19 14:19 JNR TAL CF Client Sample ID: Trip Blank Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-6 Date Collected: 02/21/19 08:00 Matrix: Soil Date Received:02/23/19 09:30 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Prep 5035 231050 02/27/19 05:39 TCH TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8260B 1 231052 02/27/19 12:23 TCH TAL CF Total/NA Prep WI GRO 230926 02/25/19 10:08 CMM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis WI-GRO 1 230905 02/25/19 13:43 DLK TAL CF Client Sample ID: Trip Blank Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-7 Date Collected: 02/21/19 08:00 Matrix:Water Date Received:02/23/19 09:30 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis 8260B 1 230851 02/25/19 22:58 SJN TAL CF Total/NA Analysis WI-GRO 1 230907 02/25/19 16:51 CMM TAL CF Client Sample ID: B-2 Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-8 Date Collected: 02/21/19 12:40 Matrix:Ground Water Date Received: 02/23/19 09:30 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis 82600 1 230851 02/25/19 23:22 SJN TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3510C 230933 02/25/19 14:38 ACJ TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8270D SIM 10 230963 02/26/19 19:46 DMD TAL CF Total/NA Analysis WI-GRO 1 230907 02/25/19 21:35 CMM TAL CF Silica Gel Cleanup Prep 3510C SGC 230972 02/26/19 08:45 ACJ TAL CF Silica Gel Cleanup Analysis WI-DRO 1 231284 03/01/19 08:39 JTA TAL CF TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 75 of 86 3/5/2019 Lab Chronicle Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID:310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Dissolved Prep 3010A 230964 02/26/19 08:02 JNR TAL CF Dissolved Analysis 6020B 1 231416 03/01/19 19:40 SAD TAL CF Dissolved Prep 7470A 230990 02/26/19 09:34 JNR TAL CF Dissolved Analysis 7470A 1 231182 02/27/19 16:23 JNR TAL CF Client Sample ID: B-3 Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-9 Date Collected:02/21/19 13:55 Matrix: Ground Water Date Received:02/23/19 09:30 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis 8260B 1 230851 02/25/19 23:46 SJN TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3510C 230933 02/25/19 14:38 ACJ TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8270D SIM 10 230963 02/26/19 20:04 DMD TAL CF Total/NA Analysis WI-GRO 1 230907 02/25/19 21:07 CMM TAL CF Silica Gel Cleanup Prep 3510C SGC 230972 02/26/19 08:45 ACJ TAL CFNINii Silica Gel Cleanup Analysis WI-DRO 1 231284 03/01/19 09:54 JTA TAL CF Dissolved Prep 3010A 230964 02/26/19 08:02 JNR TAL CF Dissolved Analysis 6020B 1 231416 03/01/19 19:44 SAD TAL CF =' �t: Dissolved Prep 7470A 230990 02/26/19 09:34 JNR TAL CF Dissolved Analysis 7470A 1 231182 02/27/19 16:26 JNR TAL CF Client Sample ID: B-4 Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-10 ate Collected: 02/21/19 15:30 Matrix: Ground Water Date Received:02/23/19 09:30 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis 8260B 1 230851 02/26/19 00:10 SJN TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3510C 230933 02/25/19 14:38 ACJ TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8270D SIM 10 230963 02/26/19 20:22 DMD TAL CF Total/NA Analysis WI-GRO 1 230907 02/25/19 20:38 CMM TAL CF Silica Gel Cleanup Prep 3510C SGC 230972 02/26/19 08:45 ACJ TAL CF Silica Gel Cleanup Analysis WI-DRO 1 231284 03/01/19 08:52 JTA TAL CF Dissolved Prep 3010A 230964 02/26/19 08:02 JNR TAL CF Dissolved Analysis 6020B 1 231416 03/01/19 19:47 SAD TAL CF Dissolved Prep 7470A 230990 02/26/19 09:34 JNR TAL CF Dissolved Analysis 7470A 1 231182 02/27/19 16:28 JNR TAL CF Client Sample ID: B-5 Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-11 Date Collected: 02/21/19 16:45 Matrix: Ground Water Date Received:02/23/19 09:30 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis 8260B 1 230851 02/26/19 00:34 SJN TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3510C 230933 02/25/19 14:38 ACJ TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8270D SIM 10 230963 02/26/19 20:41 DMD TAL CF Total/NA Analysis WI-GRO 1 230907 02/25/19 20:10 CMM TAL CF Silica Gel Cleanup Prep 3510C SGC 230972 02/26/19 08:45 ACJ TAL CF TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 76 of 86 3/5/2019 Lab Chronicle Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-5 Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-11 Date Collected:02/21/19 16:45 Matrix: Ground Water Date Received:02/23/19 09:30 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared o Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Silica Gel Cleanup Analysis WI-DRO 1 231284 03/01/19 10:07 JTA TAL CF Dissolved Prep 3010A 230964 02/26/19 08:02 JNR TAL CF Dissolved Analysis 6020B 1 231416 03/01/19 20:03 SAD TAL CF Dissolved Prep 7470A 230990 02/26/19 09:34 JNR TAL CF Dissolved Analysis 7470A 1 231182 02/27/19 16:34 JNR TAL CF Laboratory References: TAL CF=TestAmerica Cedar Falls,704 Enterprise Drive,Cedar Falls,IA 50613,TEL(319)277-2401 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 77 of 86 3/5/2019 Accreditation/Certification Summary Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 .aboratory: TestAmerica Cedar Falls Unless otherwise noted,all analytes for this laboratory were covered under each accreditation/certification below. Authority Program EPA Region Identification Number Expiration Date Minnesota NELAP 5 019-999-319 12-31-19 The following analytes are included in this report,but the laboratory is not certified by the governing authority. This list may include analytes for which the agency does not offer certification. Analysis Method Prep Method Matrix Analyte 8082A 3546 Soil PCB-1268 8260B Ground Water Dichlorofluoromethane 8260B Water Dichlorofluoromethane 8260B 5035 Soil Dichlorofluoromethane Moisture Soil Percent Moisture Moisture Soil Percent Solids TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 78 of 86 3/5/2019 Method Summary Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method Method Description Protocol Laboratory 82600 Volatile Organic Compounds(GC/MS) SW846 TAL CF 8270D SIM Semivolatile Organic Compound(GC/MS SIM LL) SW846 TAL CF WI-GRO Wisconsin-Gasoline Range Organics(GC) WI-GRO TAL CF %,` 8082A Polychlorinated Biphenyls(PCBs)by Gas Chromatography SW846 TAL CF $<T WI-DRO Wisconsin-Diesel Range Organics(GC) WI-DRO TAL CF 6010D Metals(ICP) SW846 TAL CF 6020B Metals(ICP/MS) SW846 TAL CF 7470A Mercury(CVAA) SW846 TAL CF 7471B Mercury(CVAA) SW846 TAL CF Moisture Percent Moisture EPA TAL CF 3010A Preparation, Total Metals SW846 TAL CF 3050B Preparation, Metals SW846 TAL CF 3510C Liquid-Liquid Extraction(Separatory Funnel) SW846 TAL CF 3510C SGC Liquid-Liquid Extraction(Separatory Funnel) SW846 TAL CF 3546 Microwave Extraction SW846 TAL CF 5030B Purge and Trap SW846 TAL CF 5035 Closed System Purge and Trap SW846 TAL CF 7470A Preparation,Mercury SW846 TAL CF 7471B Preparation,Mercury SW846 TAL CF WI DRO PREP Wisconsin Extraction(Diesel Range Organics) WI-DRO TAL CF 1E1 WI GRO Closed System Purge and Trap WI-GRO TAL CF Protocol References: EPA=US Environmental Protection Agency SW846="Test Methods For Evaluating Solid Waste,Physical/Chemical Methods",Third Edition,November 1986 And Its Updates. WI-DRO="Modified DRO: Method For Determining Diesel Range Organics",Wisconsin DNR,Publ-SW-141,September,1995. WI-GRO="Modified GRO: Method For Determining Gasoline Range Organics",Wsconsin DNR,Publ-SW-140,September,1995. Laboratory References: TAL CF=TestAmerica Cedar Falls,704 Enterprise Drive,Cedar Falls,IA 50613,TEL(319)277-2401 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 79 of 86 3/5/2019 TestAmerica 11 1 1 1 1 2 THE LEADER IN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING 310-149954 Chain of Custody , Cooler/Sample Receipt and Temperature Log Form Client Information ' evi Client: a nr It City/State: MOO P 1 n Ca Project: E1s\cC\e r tecidC k - rt `ty' r Receipt Information Date/Time Received:.2, 23, t9 Q30 Received By: LAB i. Delivery Type: ❑UPS ©FedEx t*' ❑ FedEx Ground ❑ US Mail ❑Spee-Dee []TA Courier ❑TA Field Services ❑Client Drop-off ❑Other: Condition of Cooler/Containers Sample(s)received in Cooler? 5 Yes ❑No If yes: Cooler ID: Multiple Coolers? fJ Yes ❑No If yes: Cooler# 1 of Cooler Custody Seals Present? U]Yes (1 No If yes: Cooler custody seals intact? 2 Yes ❑No k Sample Custody Seals Present? ❑Yes vii No If yes: Sample custody seals intact? ❑Yes n No : Trip Blank Present? 5t1 Yes n No If yes: Which VOA samples are in cooler? 1 1 4 ,.1 t wt. ..3..),_ V 1.a_i S ''v r Se M., lr•. co U ems_ I Temperature Record . I Coolant: ®Wet ice ❑ Blue ice ❑Dry ice ❑Other: ❑NONE Thermometer ID: N Correction Factor(°C): •Temp Blank Temperature—If no temp blank,or temp blank temperature above criteria,proceed to Sample Container Temperature Uncorrected Temp(°C): ( ,` Corrected Temp(°C): 113 •Sample Container Temperature Container type(s) used: Uncorrected Temp(°C): Corrected Temp(°C): Exceptions Noted 1) If temperature exceeds criteria,was sample(s)received same day of sampling? ❑Yes ❑No a) If yes: Is there evidence that the chilling process began? ❑Yes ❑No 2) If temperature is<0°C,are there obvious signs that the integrity of sample containers is compromised? (e.g.,bulging septa,broken/cracked bottles,frozen solid?) ❑Yes ❑No NOTE: If yes,contact PM before proceeding. If no,proceed with login Additional Comments Document:CF-LG-WI-002 Revision:23 General temperature criteria is 0 to 6°C Date:12/31/2017 TestAmerica-Cedar Falls Bacteria temperature criteria is 0 to 10°C Page 80 of 86 3/5/2019 S . I Place COC scanning label Tes1}�Q�i �vl/�y 1 here THE LEADER IN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING - `:1 ,kl Cooler/Sample Receipt and Temperature Log Form Client Information Client: U iv L., 1 i City/State: m 1p . P\( n PRIA Project: U s1mrr kk i ky„, Receipt Information Date/Time Received:2,23, Fi 9 30 Received By: LIVE, Delivery Type: ❑UPS f]FedEx SO* ❑ FedEx Ground ❑US Mail ❑Spee-Dee TA Courier ❑TA Field Services ❑Client Drop-off ❑Other: Condition of Cooler/Containers Sample(s)received in Cooler? 5 Yes ❑No If yes: Cooler ID: Multiple Coolers? ®Yes ❑No If yes: Cooler# 2- of Cooler Custody Seals Present? 15g Yes ❑No If yes: Cooler custody seals intact? 150 Yes ❑No Sample Custody Seals Present? ❑Yes J No If yes: Sample custody seals intact? ❑Yes ❑No 14 Trip Blank Present? ❑Yes `fes No If yes: Which VOA samples are in cooler? 1 Temperature Record Coolant: ®Wet ice ❑Blue ice ❑Dry ice ❑Other: ❑NONE Thermometer ID: Correction Factor(°C): -{0 O •Temp Blank Temperature-If no temp blank,or temp blank temperature above criteria,proceed to Sample Container Temperature Uncorrected Temp(°C): O. (ej Corrected Temp(°C): 0, •Sample Container Temperature Container type(s)used: Uncorrected Temp(°C): Corrected Temp(°C): Exceptions Noted 1) If temperature exceeds criteria,was sample(s)received same day of sampling? ❑Yes E No li a) If yes: Is there evidence that the chilling process began? ❑Yes ❑No r' 2) If temperature is<0°C,are there obvious signs that the integrity of sample containers is compromised? 1. (e.g., bulging septa,broken/cracked bottles,frozen solid?) ❑Yes ❑No — NOTE: if yes,contact PM before proceeding. If no,proceed with login Additional Comments Document:CF-LG-WI-002 Revision:23 General temperature criteria is 0 to 6"C Date:12/31/2017 TestAmerica-Cedar Falls Bacteria temperature criteria is 0 to 10'C Page 81 of 86 3/5/2019 1 j Tesfimenca Place COC scanning label here THE LEADER IN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING --- ----2 13 -- - -- - ` Pi Cooler/Sample Receipt and Temperature Log Form Client Information `, Client: ')1 Qr k...., R City/State: c p'� p\ri nR RN Project: �,15\ e V^ IV`�'C�C�(�l��C Receipt Information' Date/Time Received:2,23, 1 9 SO Received By: LAB Delivery Type: ❑UPS [J FedEx 3O+ ❑FedEx Ground ❑US Mail ❑Spee-Dee TA Courier [❑TA Field Services ❑Client Drop-off ❑Other: Condition of Cooler/Containers Sample(s)received in Cooler? [ Yes ❑ No If yes: Cooler ID: Multiple Coolers? ®Yes ❑No If yes: Cooler# 3 of 3 Cooler Custody Seals Present? Eil Yes ❑No If yes: Cooler custody seals intact? EYes ❑No 4 1 Sample Custody Seals Present? ❑Yes ]No If yes: Sample custody seals intact? ❑Yes ❑No Trip Blank Present? [ Yes ❑No If yes: Which VOA samples are in cooler? 1 14 Temperature Record . Coolant: ®Wet ice ❑Blue ice El Dry ice ❑Other: ❑NONE Thermometer ID: Correction Factor(AC): -ho* 0 •Temp Blank Temperature-If no temp blank,or temp blank temperature above criteria,proceed to Sample Container Temperature Uncorrected Temp(IC): i ,IV Corrected Temp(*C): t ,Li.. 0 Sample Container Temperature Container type(s) used: Uncorrected Temp(*C): Corrected Temp(°C): Exceptions Noted 1) If temperature exceeds criteria,was sample(s)received same day of sampling? ❑Yes ❑No a) If yes: Is there evidence that the chilling process began? ❑Yes ❑No 2) If temperature is<0°C,are there obvious signs that the integrity of sample containers is compromised? (e.g., bulging septa,broken/cracked bottles,frozen solid?) ❑Yes ❑No Non: If yes,contact PM before proceeding. If no,proceed with login Additional Comments Document:CF-LG-WI-002 Revision:23 General temperature criteria is 0 to 6°C Date:12/31/2017 TestAmerica-Cedar Falls Bacteria temperature criteria is 0 to 10°C ° 4' Page 82 of 86 3/5/2019 TestAmeri ca Cedar Falls Division Phone 319-277-2401 or 800-750-2401 To assist us in using the proper analytical methods, , 704 Enterprise Drive Fax 319-277-2425 is this work being conducted for regulatory purposes? THE LEADER IN ENVIRONME TAL E TIINNG {�Cedar Falls,IA 50613 �j Compliance Monitoring Client Name: V Il �`-�- Client#: �£03 Address: I q MVV© �I C1,(?c/l ree� �t'Cl� Project Name: t J I n�E irlGGt �3C3-��j City/State/Zip Code: `'`R i�- Q t t`!Y\ 1 lki Project#: 13 5 503 �' 000 ^ E i t dJ Project Manager: t t t�t N e}5 ,e Site/Location ID: ,�q D)"Q►1© /✓' p State: Email Address: t�7 ko r C'I61 a U 4(Om t co- e.'( O'J13b ui -4 uM Report To: J't',nCht i//Nr (/U s- e/ I P-Carr �N(� S�o(n Telephone Number: ,i'7. 8©7 *2.L/9" Fax: r"'" Invoice To: r�'t`�l/"554 W Sampler Name:(Print Name) G D -• /klh SaC-% - .---,..'- `---- a Quote#: PO#: Sampler Signature: Matrix Preservation&#of Containers Analyze For: TAT m le y� )QC Deliverables K Standard g n o v . None Rush(surcharges may apply) I oi co�; 1- Level 2 R g �� (Batch QC) Date Needed: 1 weQK � o d`� 38 Y _Level 3 13 o n oro ;, �_ Level 4 Fax Results: Y n. ,z m m 0 d ,/ m m ro v o m a, Other: 2 Email Results: !Y 1 N c-3� 0 0 o c c `� r r-� -- w SAMPLE ID t / o tE c0 iII i ai 3 i i z i z° �_� REMARK B- 1 (c-)Di) alz.10 l30 6, 5 - - 2. 3 - p x X x XC x )< _ co 9 -2 (1 S -20') 122o 2. 3 -- 4X K X X X _ >< Q_3 )i.5 - 1s'� 13d ---- L-3 -- x X A A x X }( 13 -Li /2-•S - )s' 15 o o — 2. 3 , — X 4 X is A X$ 5 x0 - 22,5 16zo - z 3 ,t X )4. / X �' /ani vgoo - - } -- X ) - - r1) $ ' - -(..- t; itc.1 C_.,3-1/1. l / // 7 . . . _ _ , Special Instructions: LABORATORY COMMENTS. TestAni neapolis SC Air �/ L11� tc3 Relinquished By: Date: Tim Received By13 /DA Date`"" e mit) Relinquished By: t ~ ` �,L9ate Tittte��/" Received B B . 6L t-fDare:`�" I9Timer cn Relinquished By: Date: Time: Received By: Date: Time: - N TAL-0033(0708) m Page of w ; T,,,,.,m eri ca Cedar Fails Division Phone 319-277-2401 or 50-2401 To assist us in using the proper analytical methods, 704 Enterprise Drive Fax 319-277-2425 is this work being conducted for regulatory purposes? Cedar Falls,IA 50613 THE LEADER IN ENVIRONME TAL ESTINGCompliance Monitoring Client Name: / �p Client#: S©3 t Address: I boo '0+ `� keet— C'1'-l° �C L<° Te�'r-' Project Name: f S( � t i ri e-'�Vt'�V3 S City/State/Zip Code: Y\ � oma•' Project#: j 6 0 - ooO j _w Project Manager: in�,.'tr- 1'-r`p ��0 S �i`e e I d Site/Location ID: }PD A b State: >�\",{\ Email Address: M t`bb Re. c3 L1 Cts p ED-, G11 .i (��EM z, h^ � t,Z(.t�+Y� ��"`�hG��P�'�C.,�P.o �''�je ort To: 1 C�f:U Q.. i 1 v Ccif'y fr Telephone Number: CO! Z $0 7X2-1i9 Fax: _.-- `---- Invoice To: rt 61;SS iA L Sampler Name:(Print Name) r�'z�• O Qir\ Quote it: PO#: Sampler Signature: Matrix Preservation&#of Containers Analyze Fir TAT IP- :o a OC Deliverables Standardw None Rush(surcharges may apply) d o,.o — N co c u, - ?<Level 2 o i (Batch OC) Date Needed: �eeK'' 0 (?).. � nc Level 3 o �, _ Fax Results: Y C a a 0 a o a , z cn _Level 4 0 E E m CD CD ea C5 1:3 n 0 N 04 c./y Other: ca Email Results: N co to `� i% = 3 o cn (� .� co SAMPLE ID E ° 3 z 2 S U Z o L «- J _ REMARKS .J. i' CS' lL C7 2 Z O -rr / P iz 2 iz((i? Vito -- — X a) 3-'Z iv ao 6 y'5 6W i 9 _--__4.— ><- x ><_ ) 13-3 1355 1 7 .- Z — X X X / G - 11 )530 1 7 — a — X X x g X 13"5 V I(oLi5 W \I .) 1 7 . Z — X OC X - �, (4.7-AA 2 1 // y . . Special Instructions: LABORAtORY COMMENTS �. . • °'4 ' a15 VIA y —t 7es#Arnerica Minneapolis SC S , • Relinquished By: Date: Time: Recel ::r' 0 Tim :. r15 7� 'frr 2`23'1 9-��' ,, Relinquished By:fig"nil el t I e: Received B : I tdncC �jti�Ctk ate: Time: co cr, Relinquished By: Date: Time: Received By: Date: Time: p TAL-0033{0'rOS) 1 co Page ` ` of I is � — — - 2/25/2019 Login Container Summary Report 310-149954 Temperature readings: Container Preservative Client Sample ID lab II) Container Type p E Added(pis) Lot 4 13-2 3 I0-149954-A-8 Plastic 250m1 -with Nitric Acid -2 2203839 11-2 310-14995-I-D-8 Amber Glass 1 liter-Hydrochloric 13 310-149954-A-9 Plastic 25(11111 - with Nitric Acid >2 2.5 2203839 !t-= 310-149954-1)-9 Amber Glass I liter- Hydrochloric 1;..I 310-149954-A-10 Plastic 250m1 - with Nitric Acid '2 2.5 2203839 l3 -I 310-149954-D-10 Amber Glass I liter- Hydrochloric 13-5 310-149954-A-I I Plastic 250m1-with Nitric Acid <2 — 2203839 13-5 310-149954-1)-I1 Amber Glass 1 liter- Hydrochloric - 1 14 is Page 85 of 86 3/5/2019 Login Sample Receipt Checklist Client:Wenck Associates,Inc Job Number:310-149954-1 SDG Number:B5503-0003 Login Number:149954 List Source:TestAmerica Cedar Falls ; -4 List Number: 1 - Creator:Homolar,Dana J v,4 ', Question Answer Comment Radioactivity wasn't checked or is<1=background as measured by a survey N/A meter. The cooler's custody seal,if present,is intact. True Sample custody seals,if present,are intact. True The cooler or samples do not appear to have been compromised or True tampered with. Samples were received on ice. True Cooler Temperature is acceptable. True Cooler Temperature is recorded. True COC is present. True COC is filled out in ink and legible. True COC is filled out with all pertinent information. True Is the Field Sampler's name present on COC? True There are no discrepancies between the containers received and the COC. True Samples are received within Holding Time(excluding tests with immediate True HTs) Sample containers have legible labels. True ontainers are not broken or leaking. True Sample collection date/times are provided. True Appropriate sample containers are used. True Sample bottles are completely filled. True Sample Preservation Verified. True There is sufficient vol.for all requested analyses,incl.any requested True MS/MSD5 Containers requiring zero headspace have no-headspace or bubble is True <6mm(1/4"). Multiphasic samples are not present. True Samples do not require splitting or compositing. True Residual Chlorine Checked. N/A TestArnerica Cedar Falls Page 86 of 86 3/5/2019 1s '1 ! 101 TestAmerica , ,,„,., F�........., .....„..„.„.:.*1 r THE LEADER IN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING , .., .. ,1 £ z ANALYTICAL REPORT E 21 TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. TestAmerica Cedar Falls ��r 704 Enterprise Drive Cedar Falls, IA 50613 Tel: (319)277-2401 TestAmerica Job ID: 310 149954-2 pr."--- TestAmerica Sample Delivery Group: B5503-0003 Client Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows Orono, MN ` For: Wenck Associates, Inc " 1802 Wooddale Drive Suite 100 Woodbury, Minnesota 55125 Attn: Michelle Hosfield r .� \.,L is r isvfi Te. Authorized for release by: � )\\ 3/8/2019 2:30:16 PM Zach Bindert, Project Manager I F (319)227-2401 " � ;: � � � zach.bindert@testamericainc.com ,.-..-:.„---..-,: i,,.- r :,-f3,41;=,, ,,:. i1riO 1 �q nn 6 � 17 C.•-;- f y.L Ti. i i resa is through s'' ; tj Total Access � F , , s n E t FJ s _Will" xi i ��e This report has been electronically signed and authorized by the signatory.Electronic signature is 3� { intended to be the legally binding equivalent of a traditionally handwritten signature. Expert Results relate onlyto the items tested and the sample(s)as received bythe laboratory. Ea Visit us`at: . =4 f1 ` www.testamericainc.com 1 Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-2 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Ei Table of Contents Cover Page 1 Table of Contents 2 Case Narrative 3 Sample Summary 4 Detection Summary 5 Client Sample Results 6 Definitions 9 QC Sample Results 10 QC Association 11 Chronicle 12 Certification Summary 13 Method Summary 14 Chain of Custody 15 Receipt Checklists 23 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 2 of 23 3/8/2019 Case Narrative Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-2 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Job ID: 310-149954-211,11 Laboratory: TestAmerica Cedar Falls Narrative Job Narrative 310-149954-2 Comments No additional comments. Receipt The samples were received on 2/23/2019 9:30 AM;the samples arrived in good condition, properly preserved and,where required, on ice. The temperatures of the 3 coolers at receipt time were 0.6°C, 1.3°C and 1.4°C. Metals No analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described in the Definitions/Glossary page. Organic Prep No analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described in the Definitions/Glossary page. TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 3 of 23 3/8/2019 Sample Summary Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-2 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Matrix Collected Received 310-149954-3 B-3(12.5-15') Soil 02/21/19 13:30 02/23/19 09:30 4 310-149954-4 B-4(12.5-15') Soil 02/21/19 15:00 02/23/19 09:30 310-149954-5 B-5(20-22.5') Soil 02/21/19 16:20 02/23/19 09:30 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 4 of 23 3/8/2019 Detection Summary Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-2 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-3 (12.5-15') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-3 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type Lead 1.64 0.100 mg/L 1 6010D TCLP Client Sample ID: B-4 (12.5-15') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-4 El No Detections. Client Sample ID: B-5(20-22.5') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-5 No Detections. This Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results. TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 5 of 23 3/8/2019 Client Sample Results Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-2 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-3 (12.5-15') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-3 Date Collected: 02/21/19 13:30 Matrix:Soil Date Received:02/23/19 09:30 Method:6010D-Metals(ICP)-TCLP Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared AnalyzedDil Fac 5.1 Lead 1.64 0.100 mg/L 03/07/19 08:38 03/07/19 17:46 1 6 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 6 of 23 3/8/2019 Client Sample Results Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-2 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-4 (12.5-15') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-4 Date Collected:02/21/19 15:00 Matrix:Soil Date Received:02/23/19 09:30 Method:6010D-Metals(ICP)-TCLP Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac „,3 Lead <0.100 0.100 mg/L 03/07/19 08:38 03/07/19 17:56 1 6 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 7 of 23 3/8/2019 Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-2 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 :Tient Sample ID: B-5 (20-22.5') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-5 Date Collected: 02/21/19 16:20 Matrix:Soil Date Received:02/23/19 09:30 Method:6010D-Metals(ICP)-TCLP Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Lead <0.100 0.100 mg/L 03/07/19 08:38 03/07/19 17:57 1 6 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 8 of 23 3/8/2019 Definitions/Glossary Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-2 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Glossary Abbreviation These commonly used abbreviations may or may not be present in this report. Listed under the"D"column to designate that the result is reported on a dry weight basis %R Percent Recovery CFL Contains Free Liquid CNF Contains No Free Liquid DER Duplicate Error Ratio(normalized absolute difference) Dil Fac Dilution Factor Ell DL Detection Limit(DoD/DOE) DL,RA,RE,IN Indicates a Dilution,Re-analysis,Re-extraction,or additional Initial metals/anion analysis of the sample DLC Decision Level Concentration(Radiochemistry) EDL Estimated Detection Limit(Dioxin) LOD Limit of Detection(DoD/DOE) LOQ Limit of Quantitation(DoD/DOE) MDA Minimum Detectable Activity(Radiochemistry) MDC Minimum Detectable Concentration(Radiochemistry) MDL Method Detection Limit ML Minimum Level(Dioxin) NC Not Calculated ND Not Detected at the reporting limit(or MDL or EDL if shown) PQL Practical Quantitation Limit )''v QC Quality Control RER Relative Error Ratio(Radiochemistry) RL Reporting Limit or Requested Limit(Radiochemistry) RPD Relative Percent Difference,a measure of the relative difference between two points TEF Toxicity Equivalent Factor(Dioxin) TEQ Toxicity Equivalent Quotient(Dioxin) TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 9 of 23 3/8/2019 QC Sample Results Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-2 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: 6010D - Metals (ICP) Lab Sample ID: LB 310-231758/1-B Client Sample ID: Method Blank Matrix:Solid Prep Type:TCLP 11 Analysis Batch: 231958 Prep Batch:231772 4 LB LB . Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Lead <0.100 0.100 mg/L 03/07/19 08:38 03/07/19 17:42 1 Lab Sample ID: LCS 310-231758/2-B Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix:Solid Prep Type:TCLP Analysis Batch:231958 Prep Batch:231772 8 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Lead 4.00 3.514 mg/L 88 80-120 Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-3 MS Client Sample ID: B-3(12.5-15') Matrix:Soil Prep Type:TCLP Analysis Batch:231958 Prep Batch:231772 Sample Sample Spike MS MS %Rec. Analyte Result Qualifier Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Lead 1.64 4.00 5.354 mg/L 93 75_125 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 10 of 23 3/8/2019 QC Association Summary Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-2 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Metals Leach Batch:231758 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch , 310-149954-3 B-3(12.5-15') TCLP Soil 1311 N; 310-149954-4 B-4(12.5-15') TCLP Soil 1311 310-149954-5 B-5(20-22.5') TCLP Soil 1311 LB 310-231758/1-B Method Blank TCLP Solid 1311 LCS 310-231758/2-B Lab Control Sample TCLP Solid 1311 310-149954-3 MS 0-3(12.5-15') TCLP Soil 1311 Prep Batch: 231772 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-149954-3 B-3(12.5-15') TCLP Soil 3010A 231758 310-149954-4 B-4(12.5-15') TCLP Soil 3010A 231758 310-149954-5 B-5(20-22.5') TCLP Soil 3010A 231758 LB 310-231758/1-B Method Blank TCLP Solid 3010A 231758 LCS 310-231758/2-B Lab Control Sample TCLP Solid 3010A 231758 310-149954-3 MS B-3(12.5-15') TCLP Soil 3010A 231758 Analysis Batch:231958 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch , I; " 310-149954-3 B-3(12.5-15') TCLP Soil 6010D 231772 ''' 310-149954-4 B-4(12.5-15') TCLP Soil 6010D 231772 310-149954-5 B-5(20-22.5') TCLP Soil 6010D 231772 LB 310-231758/1-B Method Blank TCLP Solid 6010D 231772 LCS 310-231758/2-B Lab Control Sample TCLP Solid 6010D 231772 310-149954-3 MS B-3(12.5-15') TCLP Soil 6010D 231772 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 11 of 23 3/8/2019 Lab Chronicle Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-2 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-3 (12.5-15') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-3 Date Collected:02/21/19 13:30 Matrix:Soil Date Received:02/23/19 09:30 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared ,`?. Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab TCLP Leach 1311 231758 03/06/19 12:30 ERT TAL CF TCLP Prep 3010A 231772 03/07/19 08:38 HED TAL CF TCLP Analysis 6010D 1 231958 03/07/19 17:46 CTB TAL CF Client Sample ID: B-4 (12.5-15') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-4 Date Collected:02/21/19 15:00 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 02/23/19 09:30 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab i TCLP Leach 1311 231758 03/06/19 12:30 ERT TAL CF TCLP Prep 3010A 231772 03/07/19 08:38 HED TAL CF TCLP Analysis 6010D 1 231958 03/07/19 17:56 CTB TAL CF Client Sample ID: B-5 (20-22.5') Lab Sample ID: 310-149954-5 {` Date Collected:02/21/19 16:20 Matrix:Soil Date Received:02/23/19 09:30 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab TCLP Leach 1311 231758 03/06/19 12:30 ERT TAL CF TCLP Prep 3010A 231772 03/07/19 08:38 HED TAL CF TCLP Analysis 6010D 1 231958 03/07/19 17:57 CTB TAL CF Laboratory References: TAL CF=TestAmerica Cedar Falls,704 Enterprise Drive,Cedar Falls,IA 50613,TEL(319)277-2401 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 12 of 23 3/8/2019 Accreditation/Certification Summary Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-2 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Laboratory: TestAmerica Cedar Falls Unless otherwise noted,all analytes for this laboratory were covered under each accreditation/certification below. Authority Program EPA Region Identification Number Expiration Date Minnesota NELAP 5 019-999-319 12-31-19 �c. The following analytes are included in this report,but the laboratory is not certified by the governing authority. This list may include analytes for which the agency does not offer certification. Analysis Method Prep Method Matrix Analyte TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 13 of 23 3/8/2019 Method Summary Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-149954-2 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method Method Description Protocol Laboratory 6010D Metals(ICP) SW846 TAL CF 1311 TCLP Extraction SW846 TAL CF 3010A Preparation, Total Metals SW846 TAL CF terI Protocol References: SW846="Test Methods For Evaluating Solid Waste,Physical/Chemical Methods",Third Edition,November 1986 And Its Updates. Laboratory References: TAL CF=TestAmerica Cedar Falls,704 Enterprise Drive,Cedar Falls,IA 50613,TEL(319)277-2401 meq TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 14 of 23 3/8/2019 Bindert, Zach From: Michelle L. Hosfield <mhosfield@wenck.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2019 4:24 PM To: Bindert,Zach Subject: RE:TestAmerica report and EDD files from 310-149954-1 Eisinger Meadows - Orono, MN '1111t.anall. Zach—please run TCLP lead on soil samples: 310-149954-3 310-149954-4 310-149954-5 Thanks, Michelle L. Hosfield 100 Environmental Scientist/Associate v *WENCK mhosfieldOwenck.com Di 651.395.5224 Cl 612.807.3249 1802 Wooddale Drive I Woodbury, MN 55125 From: Bindert, Zach <Zach.Bindert@testamericainc.com> Sent:Tuesday, March 05, 2019 3:52 PM To: Michelle L. Hosfield <mhosfield@wenck.com> Subject: RE:TestAmerica report and EDD files from 310-149954-1 Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN [CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.1 Just let me know.. Zach Bindert Phone: 319-277-2401 Email: Zach.Bindert(@,TestAmericainc.com From: Michelle L. Hosfield [mailto:mhosfield@wenck.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 05, 2019 3:46 PM To: Bindert, Zach Subject: RE: TestAmerica report and EDD files from 310-149954-1 Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN Page 15 of 23 3/8/2019 Thanks Zach. We may need 3 TCLP lead tests, but I'm waiting for authorization from the client. I will let you know. Michelle L. Hosfield Environmental Scientist/Associate ; rWENCK mhosfieldnawenck.com DI 651.395.5224 CI 612.807.3249 1802 Wooddale Drive I Woodbury, MN 55125 From:Zach Bindert<zach.bindert@testamericainc.com> Sent:Tuesday, March 05, 2019 1:10 PM To: Cory J. Anderson<canderson@wenck.com>; Michelle L. Hosfield<mhosfield@wenck.com> Subject:TestAmerica report and EDD files from 310-149954-1 Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN [CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.1 El Hello, Attached please find the report and EDD files for job 310-149954-1; Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Thank you. Zach T Bindert Project Manager TestAmerica Cedar Falls E-mail: zach.bindert@testamericainc.com www.TestAmericainc.com Ilin Reference:[310-344836] Attachments:2 2 Page 16 of 23 3/8/2019 i TestAmerica 11 11 1111 :OA THE LEADER IN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING 10-149954 Chain of Custody _ : 1,21 Cooler/Sample Receipt and Temperature Log Form W. Client Information41 a„ Client: Wlift( City/State: Map e ph\n PM Project: , s\`C is c Y" kNeciCxN), ,'1 Receipt Information Received By: u4i Date/Time Received:L, 3, 0 q 30 LAB Delivery Type: ❑ UPS []FedEx 3(& * ❑ FedEx Ground ❑ US Mail ❑Spee-Dee ❑TA Courier ❑TA Field Services ❑Client Drop-off ❑Other: ad fil Condition of Cooler/Containers `- Sample(s)received in Cooler? [ Yes ❑No If yes: Cooler ID: Multiple Coolers? Ea Yes ❑No If yes: Cooler# 1 of .� ii Cooler Custody Seals Present? 15(]Yes ❑No If yes: Cooler custody seals intact? iii Yes ❑No Sample Custody Seals Present? ❑Yes U No if yes: Sample custody seals intact? ❑Yes ❑No El Trip Blank Present? 13j Yes ❑No If yes: Which VOA samples are in cooler? 1 i I t LAYXl..ah..° U 1r.1._i S 4'Y c F tom. i c\. C 0 bt . Temperature Record Coolant: M Wet ice ❑ Blue ice ❑Dry ice ❑Other: r]NONE Thermometer ID: Correction Factor(°C): -j-0. 0 •Temp Blank Temperature-If no temp blank,or temp blank temperature above criteria,proceed to Sample Container Temperature Uncorrected Temp(°C): i i Corrected Temp(°C): E 13 •Sample Container Temperature Container type(s) used: Uncorrected Temp(°C): Corrected Temp(°C): . Exceptions Noted 1) If temperature exceeds criteria,was sample(s) received same day of sampling? ❑Yes ❑No a) If yes: Is there evidence that the chilling process began? ❑Yes ❑No 2) If temperature is<0°C,are there obvious signs that the integrity of sample containers is compromised? (e.g.,bulging septa, broken/cracked bottles,frozen solid?) ❑Yes ❑No NOTE: If yes,contact PM before proceeding. If no,proceed with login Additional Comments Document:CF-LG-WI-002 Revision:23 General temperature criteria is 0 to 6°C Date:12/31/2017 TestAmerica-Cedar Falls Bacteria temperature criteria is 0 to 10°C Page 17 of 23 3/8/2019 _ p 1/ ITes 1 � I 1 1 1 iti•A Place COC scanning labeltTHE LEADER IN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING .✓Cooler/Sample Receipt and Temperature Log Form Client Information Client: OAortrIL, ' City/State: cc p\e . P\ci n MR Project: Us wq e r k ec c k' . Receipt Information Date/Time Received:2,23, 0 q30 Received By: LAB Delivery Type: ❑UPS gi FedEx &X+ ❑FedEx Ground ❑US Mail ❑Spee-Dee 0 TA Courier ❑TA Field Services ❑Client Drop-off ❑Other: I Condition of Cooler/Containers Sample(s)received in Cooler? 5i1 Yes ❑No If yes: Cooler ID: Multiple Coolers? ®Yes ❑No If yes: Cooler# 2- of Cooler Custody Seals Present? E]Yes ❑No If yes: Cooler custody seals intact? lk]Yes Q No El Sample Custody Seals Present? ❑Yes tJ No If yes: Sample custody seals intact? ❑Yes ❑No Trip Blank Present? ❑Yes V]No If yes: Which VOA samples are in cooler? 1 Temperature Record Coolant: ®Wet ice ❑Blue ice ❑Dry ice ❑Other: ❑NONE Thermometer ID: N Correction Factor(°C): 4-0,0 •Temp Blank Temperature-If no temp blank,or temp blank temperature above criteria,proceed to Sample Container Temperature Uncorrected Temp(°C): 0, (. , Corrected Temp(°C): 0, •Sample Container Temperature Container type(s)used: Uncorrected Temp(°C): Corrected Temp(°C): Exceptions Noted 1) If temperature exceeds criteria,was sample(s)received same day of sampling? ❑Yes 0 No a) If yes: Is there evidence that the chilling process began? ❑Yes 0 No 2) If temperature is<0°C,are there obvious signs that the integrity of sample containers is compromised? (e.g., bulging septa,broken/cracked bottles,frozen solid?) ❑Yes ❑No NOTE: If yes,contact PM before proceeding. If no,proceed with login Additional Comments Document:CF-LG-WI-002 Revision:23 General temperature criteria is 0 to 6°C IS Date:12/31/2017 TestAmerica-Cedar Falls Bacteria temperature criteria is 0 to 10°C Page 18 of 23 3/8/2019 `�` + �m dry. 1 Place COC scanning label 1�S 1��Ti l rl 1�.+�.�i i here THE LEADER IN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING ` ----2 13 Cooler/Sample Receipt and Temperature Log Form i �3� Client Information Client: QAkr� n PM • City/State: M/`t :A�,,, plat Irl m tai Project: ,1 S\CA c r �O�C�ok l��C Receipt Information Date/Time Received:2,23. 19 I 3D Received By: LAB Delivery Type: ❑UPS [l FedEx SOCA ❑FedEx Ground ❑US Mail ❑Spee-Dee El TA Courier ❑TA Field Services ❑Client Drop-off ❑Other: i Condition of Cooler/Containers Sample(s)received in Cooler? [ Yes ❑No If yes: Cooler ID: Multiple Coolers? ®Yes ❑No If yes: Cooler# 1) of 3 t r Cooler Custody Seals Present? 5]Yes ❑No If yes: Cooler custody seals intact? 50 Yes ❑No Sample Custody Seals Present? ❑Yes In No If yes: Sample custody seals intact? ❑Yes ❑No 0 Trip Blank Present? [ Yes ❑No If yes: Which VOA samples are in cooler? 1 I Temperature Record - i Coolant: ®Wet ice ❑Blue ice ❑Dry ice ❑Other: ❑NONE Thermometer ID: Correction Factor(SC): -'-,.O •Temp Blank Temperature-If no temp blank,or temp blank temperature above criteria,proceed to Sample Container Temperature a r Uncorrected Temp(°C): r ,i4. Corrected Temp(°C): t,+ r •Sample Container Temperature ' Container type(s) used: Uncorrected Temp(DC): Corrected Temp(SC): Exceptions Noted 1) If temperature exceeds criteria,was sample(s)received same day of sampling? ❑Yes ❑No a) If yes: Is there evidence that the chilling process began? ❑Yes ❑No 2) If temperature is<0°C,are there obvious signs that the integrity of sample containers is compromised? (e.g., bulging septa,broken/cracked bottles,frozen solid?) — ❑Yes El No NoTt: If yes,contact PM before proceeding. If no,proceed with login Additional Comments c si Document:CF-LG-WI-002 , Revision:23 General temperature criteria is 0 to 6°C Date:12/31/2017 TestAmerica-Cedar Falls Bacteria temperature criteria is 0 to 10°C . Page 19 of 23 3/8/2019 Tc...Ameri ca Cedar Falls Division Phone 319-277-2401 or 50-2401 To assist us in using the proper analytical methods, 704 Enterprise Drive Fax 319-277-2425 IIIMIIIIIIIMIIIIMIIIIMIIINM Cedar Falls,IA 50613 is this work being conducted for regulatory purposes? THE LEADER IN ENVIRONME TAL E TIING ( i Compliance Monitoring Client Name: WICK�— Client#: S�©3 t Address: I IOO Fut-Neer d'heer Crel°rc CPMI E.-. Project Name: l 51 n9 E t 1VecJo _ �� p t City/State/Zip Code: t '�`{-i�- ?1 t`•(.1� 0 U v Project#: jr-0,105 503 OQ Project Manager: �`A;er g 1�e [lost a Site/Location ID: �q . j✓� State: ,/�i N Email Address: T'lko�f elt1 it cowl (-U� 2-{'5OA t)UJt-4,C0 M Report To: P Cht IIL Ij0 si:cel I ti"Cor !`[Y►t,t l!) Telephone Number: 61.2 801 32119' Fax: Invoice To: ell'e//s54 W Sampler Name:(Print Name) C O I IN 'e j''- -- Quote it: PO#: Sampler Signature: - � Matrix Preservation 84-of Containers Analyze For: Standard a �� QC Deliverables `� None Rush(surcharges may apply) �_) moo _ — y =_�, in Ile Level 2 1 o u: a (Batch QC) Date Needed: �'�K o 0' �'� _Level 3 U d � Fax Results: Y Na a a II o a 1 `tn Level 4 73 E E co a u, m; n. J cis Other: up Email Results: /Y 1 N u) i _0 3s c `� �^� `�1J No SAMPLE ID CDl� o IE c9 ii •CD g 3 1 i z 2 z° �, � REMARKS o R - 1 (5-10') alzilft 1130 b S -- — 2 3 - vc X X x / x X 1 N) a -2 (I 5 -20 I) 17/0 - 3 - 4 X >C X X x Q 3 1 5 1 s) 133 ------ Z 3 •- X X X A y X ,s( p -t )2.5 - !s' 1500 I 2 3 - X 4 >C 1c >t X. 7C $ -S 2v - 22,516ai? `d V - 13 — )L A A x X X . t./.., r\A c:3-- rz `'s_._,) / / // ? Special Instructions: TestAm‘ .= neapolis SG LQBORQTORY COMCNEtVTS: / � Issi p Relinquished By: Date:ZI. Tm � Received By `. tbSiiDa 11 Time'3). Relinquished By: tA 4'4' '' ' lSate:3` Ti e V" Received B . 46L Llij Dale:�3 Time: co co Relinquished By: Date: Time: Received By: Date: Time: N .... p TAL-0033(0708) Page I of — — ._441:,,e,,, ,_..._________..... ,—....7,—..,--, Test1meri ca Cedar Fails Division Phone 319-277-2401 or 800-750-2401 To assist us in using the proper analytical methods, 704 Enterprise Drive Fax 319 277-2425 is this work being conducted for regulatory purposes? Cedar Fails,IA 50613 Com Bance Monitorin THE LEADER IN ENVIRONME TAL ESTING P g "s Client Name: ee��, �``y Client#: `' � i /) coo,,�q}, Address: II b W 01(` 'er C1)( C may\ 7 f'�' Project Name: f �( 1 �``�' City/State/Zip Code: V " ��— ` � Y\ V ' Project#: f3 5 6 0 – 04 0 3 Project Manager: i""1 ��`ire.,[ ,le, /lo S t' Site/„LoacNation ID: �,/� roil()` State: ll Y`r Email Address: M i`u)J'lL, ( l J E 11.971 t CZ h^ ` (L fr k 4 t-4)�\t���"-rseport To: t ' ` t C he Q 1 L� crime y �' Z% Invoice To: el;S S 4 i Telephone Number: 1 Fax: .�-- ~� `� Sampler Name:(Print Name) C_ b ;01.-- 0 Quote#: PO#: Sampler Signature: Matrix Preservation&#of Containers Analyze F•r TAT o / QC Deliverables Standard None Rush(surcharges may apply) tu o - y a:. }(Level 2 n c • o GNC (Batch OC) Date Needed: �eK' E `� CSC _Level 3 F-1:1ax Results: Y a a 11 w 3 m Q 4 T Other: 4 co E E m o ow o a .r� cQ Email Results: N u cy 3 I `'�' 1 c/t N SAMPLE ID I cis IL, c5 LL vii 0 i i z i z oCD REMARKS ,rr i P 11 1� 21tr lif 00 '� 3 – — W 13-'Z i24o 6 yti CsW 1 _q_________--4K,..... K X k 13:3 I35S 1 — Z X X X i3— 1-1153 a 1 7 _______ z -- X X X X III C ---'yj e i r4 - .., A i .' I I/ 7 I Special Instructions: LABORATORY COMMENTS: t1 c, IlAk TestAmerica Minneapolis SC �� y7 2;13 Relinquished By: Date: / Time: 1� Recel e• Da Time? q v / - _ ri' 7 2-'231 �3 t� Relinquished B : �� 1 I e: Received B : tntha Btila.Q1-�ate: Time: C,) w Relinquished By: Date: Time: Received By: Date: Time: N TAL-0033(0708) o m113 Page of Zi, 2/25/2019 . Login Container Summary Report 310-149954 perature readings. Container Preservative Client Sample ID Lab ID Container'1'ype all Added(mis) Lot' 13-2 310-149954-A-8 Plastic 250m1- with Nitric Acid <2 _ 2203839 k 13-2 310-149954-D-8 Amber Glass I liter- Hydrochloric --- ,--„1, s li-> 310-149954-A-9 Plastic 250m1 - with Nitric Acid >2 2.5 2203839 K-1 310-149954-1)-9 Amber Glass 1 liter- Hydrochloric II..l 310-149954-A-10 Plastic 250m1- with Nitric Acid `2 2.5 2203839 11-4 310-149954-D-10 Amber Glass I liter-Hydrochloric li-5 310-149954-A-I I Plastic 250m1-with Nitric Acid <2 _ 2203839 It-; 310-149954-1)-I1 Amber Glass / liter- Hydrochloric _ — 1 1 1 is 1 .; EEI f 1 Pa:,c I n1-I Page 22 of 23 3/8/2019 Login Sample Receipt Checklist Client:Wenck Associates, Inc Job Number:310-149954-2 SDG Number:B5503-0003 Login Number:149954 List Source:TestAmerica Cedar Falls List Number:1 Creator:Homolar,Dana J Question Answer Comment Radioactivity wasn't checked or is<1=background as measured by a survey N/A meter. The cooler's custody seal,if present,is intact. True Sample custody seals,if present,are intact. True The cooler or samples do not appear to have been compromised or True tampered with. Samples were received on ice. True Cooler Temperature is acceptable. True Cooler Temperature is recorded. True COC is present. True COC is filled out in ink and legible. True COC is filled out with all pertinent information. True Is the Field Sampler's name present on COC? True p- There are no discrepancies between the containers received and the COC. True Samples are received within Holding Time(excluding tests with immediate True 14 HTs) Sample containers have legible labels. True Containers are not broken or leaking. True Sample collection date/times are provided. True Appropriate sample containers are used. True Sample bottles are completely filled. True Sample Preservation Verified. True There is sufficient vol.for all requested analyses,incl.any requested True MS/MSDs Containers requiring zero headspace have no headspace or bubble is True <6mm(1/4"). Multiphasic samples are not present. True Samples do not require splitting or compositing. True Residual Chlorine Checked. N/A TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 23 of 23 3/8/2019 • TestAmerica = g y THE LEADER IN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING ANALYTICAL REPORT TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. •° TestAmerica Sacramento 880 Riverside Parkway West Sacramento, CA 95605 Tel: (916)373-5600 01111FP.r— TestAmerica Job ID: 320-47953-1 TestAmerica Sample Delivery Group: 320-47953-1 Client Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows For: Wenck Associates, Inc 1802 Wooddale Drive Suite 100 Woodbury, Minnesota 55125 Attn: Michelle Hosfield 11111 i<0;i1k#1%,••)401J1•P'''} Authorized for release by: 3/7/2019 5:18:25 PM Kathryn Kelly, Project Manager II (802)923-1021 kathryn.kelly@testamericainc.com • resu its Total Access The The test results in this report meet all 2003 NELAC and 2009 TNI requirements for accredited parameters,exceptions are noted in this report. This report may not be reproduced except in full, Ex•e rt and with written approval from the laboratory.For questions please contact the Project Manager r r at the e-mail address or telephone number listed on this page. `I This report has been electronically signed and authorized by the signatory. Electronic signature is intended to be the legally binding equivalent of a traditionally handwritten signature. Visit us at: www.testamericainc.com Results relate only to the items tested and the sample(s)as received by the laboratory. Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 320-47953-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 320-47953-1 Table of Contents Cover Page 1 Table of Contents 2 Definitions/Glossary 3 Case Narrative 4 Detection Summary 5 Client Sample Results 6 QC Sample Results 8 QC Association Summary 9 Lab Chronicle 10 Certification Summary 12 Method Summary 13 Sample Summary 14 Chain of Custody 15 Field Data Sheets 17 Receipt Checklists 20 • • TestAmerica Sacramento Page 2 of 20 3/7/2019 Definitions/Glossary Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 320-47953-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 320-47953-1 QualifiersEl Air-GC VOA Qualifier Qualifier Description U Indicates the analyte was analyzed for but not detected. { Glossary Abbreviation These commonly used abbreviations may or may not be present in this report. Listed under the"D"column to designate that the result is reported on a dry weight basis %R Percent Recovery CFL Contains Free Liquid CNF Contains No Free Liquid DER Duplicate Error Ratio(normalized absolute difference) Dil Fac Dilution Factor DL Detection Limit(DoD/DOE) DL,RA,RE,IN Indicates a Dilution,Re-analysis,Re-extraction,or additional Initial metals/anion analysis of the sample DLC Decision Level Concentration(Radiochemistry) EDL Estimated Detection Limit(Dioxin) LOD Limit of Detection(DoD/DOE) LOQ Limit of Quantitation(DoD/DOE) MDA Minimum Detectable Activity(Radiochemistry) MDC Minimum Detectable Concentration(Radiochemistry) MDL Method Detection Limit ML Minimum Level(Dioxin) NC Not Calculated D Not Detected at the reporting limit(or MDL or EDL if shown) QL Practical Quantitation Limit QC Quality Control RER Relative Error Ratio(Radiochemistry) RL Reporting Limit or Requested Limit(Radiochemistry) RPD Relative Percent Difference,a measure of the relative difference between two points TEF Toxicity Equivalent Factor(Dioxin) TEQ Toxicity Equivalent Quotient(Dioxin) TestAmerica Sacramento Page 3 of 20 3/7/2019 Case Narrative Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 320-47953-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 320-47953-1 Job ID: 320-47953-1 Laboratory: TestAmerica Sacramento 4 Narrative CASE NARRATIVE Client: Wenck Associates, Inc Project: Eisinger Meadows Report Number: 320-47953-1 With the exceptions noted as flags or footnotes, standard analytical protocols were followed in the analysis of the samples and no problems were encountered or anomalies observed. In addition all laboratory quality control samples were within established control limits,with any exceptions noted below. Each sample was analyzed to achieve the lowest possible reporting limit within the constraints of the method. In some cases, due to interference or analytes present at high concentrations,samples were diluted. For diluted samples, the reporting limits are adjusted relative to the dilution required. Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated results. All holding times were met and proper preservation noted for the methods performed on these samples, unless otherwise detailed in the individual sections below. RECEIPT The samples were received on 02/28/2019;the samples arrived in good condition. SULFUR Samples SV-1, SV-4, SV-5, SV-6, SV-7, SV-8,SV-9, SV-10, SV-11, SV-12, SV-13 and SV-14 were analyzed for Sulfur in accordance with EP, Method 15/16.The samples were analyzed on 03/01/2019 and 03/02/2019. No analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described above or in the Definitions/Glossary page. TestAmerica Sacramento Page 4 of 20 3/7/2019 Detection Summary Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 320-47953-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 320-47953-1 Client Sample ID: SV-1 Lab Sample ID: 320-47953-1 No Detections. Client Sample ID: SV-4 Lab Sample ID: 320-47953-2 El Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type Hydrogen sulfide 0.53 0.40 0.20 ppm v/v 1 EPA 15_16 Total/NA Client Sample ID: SV-5 Lab Sample ID: 320-47953-3 No Detections. Client Sample ID: SV-6 Lab Sample ID: 320-47953-4 No Detections. Client Sample ID: SV-7 Lab Sample ID: 320-47953-5 No Detections. Client Sample ID: SV-8 Lab Sample ID: 320-47953-6 arm No Detections. Client Sample ID: SV-9 Lab Sample ID: 320-47953-7 I—No Detections. Client Sample ID: SV-10 Lab Sample ID: 320-47953-8 No Detections. Client Sample ID: SV-11 Lab Sample ID: 320-47953-9 No Detections. Client Sample ID: SV-12 Lab Sample ID: 320-47953-10 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type Hydrogen sulfide 0.98 0.40 0.20 ppm v/v 1 EPA 15_16 Total/NA Client Sample ID: SV-13 Lab Sample ID: 320-47953-11 No Detections. Client Sample ID: SV-14 Lab Sample ID: 320-47953-12 No Detections. his Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results. TestAmerica Sacramento Page 5 of 20 3/7/2019 Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 320-47953-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 320-47953-1 Client Sample ID: SV-1 Lab Sample ID: 320-47953-1 Date Collected: 02/27/19 09:15 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 09:30 Sample Container: Tedlar Bag 1L Method: EPA 15_16 -Sulfur Emissions from Stationary Sources (GC/FPD) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Hydrogen sulfide 0.40 U 0.40 0.20 ppm v/v 03/01/19 17:03 1 6 Client Sample ID: SV-4 Lab Sample ID: 320-47953-2 Date Collected: 02/27/19 11:25 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 09:30 Sample Container: Tedlar Bag 1L Method: EPA 15_16 -Sulfur Emissions from Stationary Sources (GC/FPD) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Hydrogen sulfide 0.53 0.40 0.20 ppm v/v 03/01/19 17:08 1 Client Sample ID: SV-5 Lab Sample ID: 320-47953-3 Date Collected: 02/27/19 12:05 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 09:30 Sample Container: Tedlar Bag 1L Method: EPA 15_16 -Sulfur Emissions from Stationary Sources (GC/FPD) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Hydrogen sulfide 0.40 U 0.40 0.20 ppm v/v 03/01/19 17:12 1 Client Sample ID: SV-6 Lab Sample ID: 320-47953-4 Date Collected: 02/27/19 12:30 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 09:30 Sample Container: Tedlar Bag 1L Method: EPA 15_16 -Sulfur Emissions from Stationary Sources (GC/FPD) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Hydrogen sulfide 0.40 U 0.40 0.20 ppm v/v 03/01/19 17:17 1 Client Sample ID: SV-7 Lab Sample ID: 320-47953-5 Date Collected: 02/27/19 12:40 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 09:30 Sample Container: Tedlar Bag 1L Method: EPA 15_16 -Sulfur Emissions from Stationary Sources (GC/FPD) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Hydrogen sulfide 0.40 U 0.40 0.20 ppm v/v 03/01/19 17:23 1 Client Sample ID: SV-8 Lab Sample ID: 320-47953-6 Date Collected: 02/27/19 13:20 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 09:30 Sample Container: Tedlar Bag 1L Method: EPA 15_16 -Sulfur Emissions from Stationary Sources (GC/FPD) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Hydrogen sulfide 0.40 U 0.40 0.20 ppm v/v 03/02/19 10:41 1 TestAmerica Sacramento Page 6 of 20 3/7/2019 Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 320-47953-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 320-47953-1 :tient Sample ID: SV-9 Lab Sample ID: 320-47953-7 Date Collected: 02/27/19 13:50 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 09:30 Sample Container: Tedlar Bag 1L Method: EPA 15_16 -Sulfur Emissions from Stationary Sources (GC/FPD) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Hydrogen sulfide 0.40 U 0.40* 0.20 ppm v/v 03/02/19 10:48 1 6 Client Sample ID: SV-10 Lab Sample ID: 320-47953-8 Date Collected: 02/27/19 14:20 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 09:30 Sample Container: Tedlar Bag 1L Method: EPA 15_16 -Sulfur Emissions from Stationary Sources (GC/FPD) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Hydrogen sulfide 0.40 U 0.40 0.20 ppm v/v 03/02/19 10:59 1 Client Sample ID: SV-11 Lab Sample ID: 320-47953-9 Date Collected: 02/27/19 14:45 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 09:30 Sample Container: Tedlar Bag 1L Method: EPA 15_16 -Sulfur Emissions from Stationary Sources (GC/FPD) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Hydrogen sulfide 0.40 U 0.40 0.20 ppm v/v 03/02/19 11:29 1 Tient Sample ID: SV-12 Lab Sample ID: 320-47953-10 late Collected: 02/27/19 15:08 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 09:30 Sample Container: Tedlar Bag 1L Method: EPA 15_16 -Sulfur Emissions from Stationary Sources (GC/FPD) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Hydrogen sulfide 0.98 0.40 0.20 ppm v/v 03/02/19 11:34 1 Client Sample ID: SV-13 Lab Sample ID: 320-47953-11 Date Collected: 02/27/19 15:30 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 09:30 Sample Container: Tedlar Bag 1L Method: EPA 15_16 - Sulfur Emissions from Stationary Sources (GC/FPD) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Hydrogen sulfide 0.40 U 0.40 0.20 ppm v/v 03/02/19 12:10 1 Client Sample ID: SV-14 Lab Sample ID: 320-47953-12 Date Collected: 02/27/19 16:03 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 09:30 Sample Container: Tedlar Bag 1L Method: EPA 15_16-Sulfur Emissions from Stationary Sources (GC/FPD) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Hydrogen sulfide 0.40 U 0.40 0.20 ppm v/v 03/02/19 12:15 1 TestAmerica Sacramento Page 7 of 20 3/7/2019 QC Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 320-47953-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 320-47953-1 Method: EPA 15_16 - Sulfur Emissions from Stationary Sources (GC/FPD) Lab Sample ID: MB 320-279115/26 Client Sample ID: Method Blank Matrix: Air Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 279115 MB MB Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Hydrogen sulfide 0.40 U 0.40 0.20 ppm v/v 03/01/19 16:47 1 Lab Sample ID: LCS 320-279115/24 Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample El Matrix: Air Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 279115 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Hydrogen sulfide 2.11 2.00 ppm v/v 95 63_140 Lab Sample ID: LCSD 320-279115/25 Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Dup Matrix: Air Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 279115 Spike LCSD LCSD %Rec. RPD Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits RPD Limit Hydrogen sulfide 2.11 1.98 ppm v/v 94 63_140 1 20 Lab Sample ID: MB 320-279293/9 Client Sample ID: Method Blank Matrix: Air Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 279293 MB MB Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Hydrogen sulfide 0.40 U 0.40 0.20 ppm v/v 03/02/19 10:27 1 Lab Sample ID: LCS 320-279293/4 Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix: Air Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 279293 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits LHydrogen sulfide 2.11 2.07 ppm v/v 98 63-140 Lab Sample ID: LCSD 320-279293/5 Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Dup Matrix: Air Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 279293 Spike LCSD LCSD %Rec. RPD Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits RPD Limit Hydrogen sulfide 2.11 2.04 ppm v/v 97 63.140 1 20 TestAmerica Sacramento Page 8 of 20 3/7/2019 QC Association Summary Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 320-47953-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 320-47953-1 Air - GC VOA Analysis Batch: 279115 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 320-47953-1 SV-1 Total/NA Air EPA 15_16 ;' 320-47953-2 SV-4 Total/NA Air EPA 15_16 320-47953-3 SV-5 Total/NA Air EPA 15_16 320-47953-4 SV-6 Total/NA Air EPA 15_16 320-47953-5 SV-7 Total/NA Air EPA 15_16 MB 320-279115/26 Method Blank Total/NA Air EPA 15_16 LCS 320-279115/24 Lab Control Sample Total/NA Air EPA 15_16 LCSD 320-279115/25 Lab Control Sample Dup Total/NA Air EPA 15_16 Analysis Batch: 279293 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 320-47953-6 SV-8 Total/NA Air EPA 15_16 320-47953-7 SV-9 Total/NA Air EPA 15_16 320-47953-8 SV-10 Total/NA Air EPA 15_16 320-47953-9 SV-11 Total/NA Air EPA 15_16 320-47953-10 SV-12 Total/NA Air EPA 15_16 320-47953-11 SV-13 Total/NA Air EPA 15_16 320-47953-12 SV-14 Total/NA AirEPA 15_16 ;, MB 320-279293/9 Method Blank Total/NA Air EPA 15_16 I^ LCS 320-279293/4 Lab Control Sample Total/NA Air EPA 15_16 LCSD 320-279293/5 Lab Control Sample Dup Total/NA Air EPA 15 16 TestAmerica Sacramento Page 9 of 20 3/7/2019 Lab Chronicle Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 320-47953-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 320-47953-1 Client Sample ID: SV-1 Lab Sample ID: 320-47953-1 Date Collected: 02/27/19 09:15 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 09:30 Batch Batch Dil Initial Final Batch Prepared 55 Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis EPA 15_16 1 50 mL 50 mL 279115 03/01/19 17:03 NS1 TAL SAC Client Sample ID: SV-4 Lab Sample ID: 320-47953-2 Date Collected: 02/27/19 11:25 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 09:30 Batch Batch Dil Initial Final Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis EPA 15_16 1 50 mL 50 mL 279115 03/01/19 17:08 NS1 TAL SAC Client Sample ID: SV-5 Lab Sample ID: 320-47953-3 Date Collected: 02/27/19 12:05 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 09:30 Batch Batch Dil Initial Final Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis EPA 15_16 1 50 mL 50 mL 279115 03/01/19 17:12 NS1 TAL SAC Client Sample ID: SV-6 Lab Sample ID: 320-47953-4 Date Collected: 02/27/19 12:30 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 09:30 Batch Batch Dil Initial Final Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis EPA 15_16 1 50 mL 50 mL 279115 03/01/19 17:17 NS1 TAL SAC Client Sample ID: SV-7 Lab Sample ID: 320-47953-5 Date Collected: 02/27/19 12:40 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 09:30 Batch Batch Dil Initial Final Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis EPA 15_16 1 50 mL 50 mL 279115 03/01/19 17:23 NS1 TAL SAC Client Sample ID: SV-8 Lab Sample ID: 320-47953-6 Date Collected: 02/27/19 13:20 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 09:30 Batch Batch Dil Initial Final Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis EPA 15_16 1 50 mL 50 mL 279293 03/02/19 10:41 NS1 TAL SAC TestAmerica Sacramento Page 10 of 20 3/7/2019 Lab Chronicle Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 320-47953-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 320-47953-1 Client Sample ID: SV-9 Lab Sample ID: 320-47953-7 Date Collected: 02/27/19 13:50 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 09:30 Batch Batch Dil Initial Final Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis EPA 15_16 1 50 mL 50 mL 279293 03/02/19 10:48 NS1 TAL SAC Client Sample ID: SV-10 Lab Sample ID: 320-47953-8 Date Collected: 02/27/19 14:20 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 09:30 Batch Batch Dil Initial Final Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab 9 Total/NA Analysis EPA 15_16 1 50 mL 50 mL 279293 03/02/19 10:59 NS1 TAL SAC Client Sample ID: SV-11 Lab Sample ID: 320-47953-9 Date Collected: 02/27/19 14:45 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 09:30 Batch Batch Dil Initial Final Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab k. Total/NA Analysis EPA 15_16 1 50 mL 50 mL 279293 03/02/19 11:29 NS1 TAL SAC Client Sample ID: SV-12 Lab Sample ID: 320-47953-10 gate Collected: 02/27/19 15:08 Matrix: Air late Received: 02/28/19 09:30 Batch Batch Dil Initial Final Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis EPA 15_16 1 50 mL 50 mL 279293 03/02/19 11:34 NS1 TAL SAC Client Sample ID: SV-13 Lab Sample ID: 320-47953-11 Date Collected: 02/27/19 15:30 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 09:30 Batch Batch Dil Initial Final Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis EPA 15_16 1 50 mL 50 mL 279293 03/02/19 12:10 NS1 TAL SAC Client Sample ID: SV-14 Lab Sample ID: 320-47953-12 Date Collected: 02/27/19 16:03 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 09:30 Batch Batch Oil Initial Final Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Amount Amount Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis EPA 15_16 1 50 mL 50 mL 279293 03/02/19 12:15 NS1 TAL SAC Laboratory References: TAL SAC=TestAmerica Sacramento,880 Riverside Parkway,West Sacramento,CA 95605,TEL(916)373-5600 TestAmerica Sacramento Page 11 of 20 3/7/2019 Accreditation/Certification Summary Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 320-47953-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 320-47953-1 Laboratory: TestAmerica Sacramento All accreditations/certifications held by this laboratory are listed. Not all accreditations/certifications are applicable to this report. Authority Program EPA Region Identification Number Expiration Date Alaska(UST) State Program 10 17-020 01-20-21 ANAB DoD/DOE L2468 01-20-21 Arizona State Program 9 AZ0708 08-11-19 Arkansas DEQ State Program 6 88-0691 06-17-19 California State Program 9 2897 01-31-20 Colorado State Program 8 CA00044 08-31-19 Connecticut State Program I PH-0691 06-30-19 Florida NELAP 4 E87570 06-30-19 Georgia State Program 4 N/A 01-28-19* Hawaii State Program 9 N/A 01-29-20 Illinois NELAP 5 200060 03-17-19 Kansas NELAP 7 E-10375 10-31-19 Louisiana NELAP 6 30612 06-30-19 Maine State Program 1 CA0004 04-14-20 Michigan State Program 5 9947 01-31-20 Nevada State Program 9 CA00044 07-31-19 New Hampshire NELAP 1 2997 04-18-19 New Jersey NELAP 2 CA005 06-30-19 w. New York NELAP 2 11666 03-31-19* Oregon NELAP 10 4040 01-29-20 Pennsylvania NELAP 3 68-01272 03-31-19* Texas NELAP 6 T104704399 05-31-19 US Fish&Wildlife Federal LE148388-0 07-31-19 USDA Federal P330-18-00239 01-17-21 USEPA UCMR Federal 1 CA00044 12-31-20 Utah NELAP 8 CA00044 02-28-19* Vermont State Program 1 VT-4040 04-30-19 Virginia NELAP 3 460278 03-14-19* Washington State Program 10 C581 05-05-19 West Virginia(DW) State Program 3 9930C 12-31-19 Wyoming State Program 8 8TMS-L 01-28-19* Laboratory: TestAmerica Burlington The accreditations/certifications listed below are applicable to this report. Authority Program EPA Region Identification Number Expiration Date Minnesota NELAP 5 050-999-436 12-31-19 *Accreditation/Certification renewal pending-accreditation/certification considered valid. TestAmerica Sacramento Page 12 of 20 3/7/2019 Method Summary Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 320-47953-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 320-47953-1 Method Method Description Protocol Laboratory EPA 15_16 Sulfur Emissions from Stationary Sources(GC/FPD) EPA TAL SAC Protocol References: EPA=US Environmental Protection Agency Laboratory References: TAL SAC=TestAmerica Sacramento,880 Riverside Parkway,West Sacramento,CA 95605,TEL(916)373-5600 TestAmerica Sacramento Page 13 of 20 3/7/2019 Sample Summary Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 320-47953-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 320-47953-1 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Matrix Collected Received 320-47953-1 SV-1 Air 02/27/19 09:15 02/28/19 09:30 320-47953-2 SV-4 Air 02/27/19 11:25 02/28/19 09:30 320-47953-3 SV-5 Air 02/27/19 12:05 02/28/19 09:30 320-47953-4 SV-6 Air 02/27/19 12:30 02/28/19 09:30 320-47953-5 SV-7 Air 02/27/19 12:40 02/28/19 09:30 320-47953-6 SV-8 Air 02/27/19 13:20 02/28/19 09:30 320-47953-7 SV-9 Air 02/27/19 13:50 02/28/19 09:30 320-47953-8 SV-10 Air 02/27/19 14:20 02/28/19 09:30 320-47953-9 SV-11 Air 02/27/19 14:45 02/28/19 09:30 320-47953-10 SV-12 Air 02/27/19 15:08 02/28/19 09:30 320-47953-11 SV-13 Air 02/27/19 15:30 02/28/19 09:30 320-47953-12 SV-14 Air 02/27/19 16:03 02/28/19 09:30 1113 TestAmerica Sacramento Page 14 of 20 3/7/2019 - I tt,:k Lc I. ;., TestAmerica Burlington Canister Samples Chain of Custody Record TestAmerica 4, 30 Community Drive Suite 11 TestAmenca Laboratories,Inc assumes no liability with respect to the collection and shipment of these samples r1-4c LEAOER IN F4 VIRONMENTAL TESTING South Burlington,VT 05403-6809 cd t/ TestAmerica Laboratories,Inc. =• phone 802.660.1990 fax 802.660.1919 1 (..„. ..., ,•< ,L. 7 .... i tr"-N 71"d COG No' Client Contact Infator9 If. Israt Project Manage9./,...: . z. Samples Collected By: x ,,p)-e..-4 Company Name: ,, hone: (01 4 e)y/ t of I-- COCs Address: Ito Dy .?\Z-A7`....0- cd -‘-3`A Email: 01 W.,S t ei LA az Lotyurt.c.cri----L City/State/Zip Pit kit 4s t.,\tf\ '\ C.cA-..Na cr,sc.',r)004:-..$)ei,t(K,ce'*---- N ...„. For Lab Use Only: Phone: iII 3 tf`-f ZP3g. Site Contact: Li:2r'7 Ityvx or (-9.1". IT' 3 Walk-in Client. FAX: Liel/Fax Vp 1-4 Li 3 :6 tu43.S 3 c is - Lab Sampling' ---------ti, f. Project Name' .:- i 5 1 rnp krir Mkc ) Anal/Isis Turnaround Time g c > _, ro 2 Slte/Location c V Ci-NO Standard(Specific) c o - , Job/SOO No: PC# 1S.0.13 - °6C)'-=. Rush(Specihy): 3 •ti LI ft c ., .. 15 E g (See below for Add!Items) •l t.0 11.1 0 a 8 , Canister Canister Flow to m f2 CO # a 8 CI Start Time Vacuum In Vacuum In Controller Canister ;0_ LI-, 0 !..) a' -a-, e....- 4.. a 1 0 Date(s) Sample Identification Sample Stop Field,'14g Field,'Hg 113 71, fl " .7, 4.- tt t 'g ki a >1 g ID (Stul)' (Stop)' Jiff t.- I- Si W 4 LU 0 :4 5. 0 to so ..i o Sample Specific Notes: V — 1 '') • / 9 if/ „.......----- , ,___,_ ' - -- soMMI...t.r. _,... 11111111111Ller.." -- ..........0 .""na....15 .,..............,..._"" .....„........._ _______ , CO , VilliM401111.1111.117Wrill - '-"4°'" -. ---, s — _____ GI 9 — I 40 S ..___----- ---- x --a — IRSO . -..--" __.----- X _________ Al _________ .., 0- ri. t z 10 ____—____ - ---.......— x __...------4,X ...----- if S V- e 1 i 3 ao ___.— _---- K ---- K .,----- ----‘, (-1 —___,---- . ____. — _ SA)— 9 13 60 „------ __ _____.--- ---- x ----- . — . S0—10 V 1 Liz° ._--___ __ x ____, x, _______ = Ternierature(Fahrenhei Start Interior Ambient Stop ......../ Pressure(inches of Hg Start Interior Ambient Sto. Special InstructionsIQC Requirements : Comments: - I- ' lAir 6 75 .. r.,r- 14 C 51,,,,r, ii.G(ci i4y,,tyt v4- A? — . Lt...L..„. Samples Shipped by: .0. 111101991.- sate/Time: a/2./7/ i 97111 a Sa L.•s•Received b • ‘ 424..-4,'-• / - r)77/ 4 4'/ hod . :SarnWblinqujs . — /I ' 3;,,)F7:(i i 7/c -ece ed by: .. -45 jyAr-ift 1,''''' —1.1 esi-A:c.2. ....--*".'"C4<1.‘...t,„ Relinquished by: Date/Time: Received by: o.oLab Use Only: Shipper Name: Opened by: Condition: --... Form No.CA-C-WI-003,Rev.2.5,dated 9/22/2017 iv cz) , co Fill 1-1z_s TestAmerica Burlington Canister Samples Chain of Custody Record TestAmerica 30 Community Drive Suite 11 TestAmenca Laboratories,Inc assumes no Saba with respect to the collection and shipment of these samples tHs LEADER IN ENVIIIONMINTAt TrsTING South Burlington,VT 05403-6809 phone 802.660.1990 fax 802 660 1919 it; 'i 6-6 \r‘o r:el° TestAmerica Laboratories,Inc. Client Contact infirritttan ‘..c.._ Client Project Manage n Samples Collected By: cog No: Company Name. \A-KA Ni..... Phone: Cp rei,507 ?4 ti" L. of ? COCs Address: ip!kW is,-.4;,,. .: c..%.',eK t.v.,:tr-- Email: th\\tic)Si,OA ''LL/0,4^10Z-.2(-•t'''i 2 City/State/ZtiNgkitt. iir...t,,,f.,.t, LX-e‘he kl-.i.ii•-t`N For Lab Use Only: Phone 0 L, 44/ 2.,... 3,E, Site Contact: C,....--r i is si re a 1 Walk-in Client FAX -------- Tel/Fax 3 c iri - Lab Sampling' Project Name .,; ,,,,N,49/ iN)tAx..-IS Anaylsis Turnaround Time a 3 ,c ?: .i- > in 1 Site/Location C)r0 c'-'b, ilA\\-1. Standard(Specific) ....V. c s Job!SDG No..0 = I (See below for Add]Items) P0# --cS,.C, k -CirOcCi Rush(Spectfly) itis 1 to gi Canister Can4 ister a 2 Sample ,o - u 'c"'I, i i s •4 ° 0 8. t.5- Sample identification Time Start Timestop 'VacuumFieldH gin YFai sclude TH icin Flow Canister ID Date(*) Controller ( ID 00 a. (Start)' (Stop) o o a. o. in a. .-• is io 1- ).- w ul 4 UJ 0 (A .E co to co -.I o Sample Specific Notes: — SO-17 i SOB ----- -......-----A----- x __________ i 1--, CT) - --27. -AM......"M"ir--- -'=------.- - -...... .,_--.-- .- - 0 "'''' r'----. '-'4 '" - '--"- - - .....-- ----- --'-"-""--- ..-."........- - --..."-----.....W.............-- -..-t- N) <--- 0 - ' --- . ------ ‹....„ . ----- --,-- Temperature(Fahrenheit) Start Interior Ambient ., Stop Pressure(inches of Hg) Start Interior Ambient ' S .,. Special Instructions/QC Requirem i. • Comm i: Aa 1 I 4 I ( ti Ity- bit i ,A.,v HI 5 s Samples Shipped by: ....-"ci---, Date i Time: /Z(1/ t 11/6)Stel Reeptcrld b 0 ,d...7.)7// ', /2/(,) Sam?VnvIshpot b • ._ 37 i i 5 ....3/ ---- R ...., ..7.72,......L,. (4A_Ap- ,-..z./ t el (.....-"C "1-,C) c'-*\ Relinquished by:by: Date/Time: Received by: . . Lab Use Only; Shipper Name: Opened by: Condition: C..) R-5 Form No.CA-C-W1.003,Rev.2.5,dated 9/22/2017 C , --, (1) le --- - 1.. CANISTER RECEIVING , • 'canister ID Flow IQ Can star ID ow 1 1 16 16 IF 2 2 17 17 3 3 . 18 18 44 19 19 msnompormaerammeausrolilmi6 620 20 , ; 6 6 2121 • 7 7 22 22 , B6 23 23 9 9 24 24 t 10 10 i 26 26 11 11 26 26 P 12 12 27 27 j, 13 13 28 28R 14 14 ' i 29 29 . 16 16 30 30 32513 Pelican Case Inventory Case ID: #of Filter Caps Zip Sea I 1 1 !1i' t I i i iI I I Temperature: #of Sample Tubes: I 1 1 #i 1 #of Wrenches: ' #of Unused Tubes: Ili 1 l �i 1 320-4ict5?Field Sheet #of Gloves:vimumm ., Sacramento TestAmerica , iiimilm....mmit . ME LEADER rN ENVIROANIEHtAL'rEM MO .Sample Receiving Notes-Job ServiFedEx`1JPS Lab Courier Client Drop Off Use this form to record Sample Custody Seel,Cooler ...-) , Custody Seel,Temperature&corrected Temperature&other P O Overnight 2-Day Ground Other:__.___ observations. File In the job folder with the COC 4,1 �: m_ yTransferred by Sacramento,Yes ❑ No 0 q i I U gtC.i'i -2C #Bags: 1___ 1L, 2L, 10L "7.7•;Cr #Canisters: 1 L, 6L, TA ❑ Non TA❑ #Canisters Unused: 1 L, 6L Notes: #Co-Locators , #Gauges: #Flow Regulators: Initial&Date c `z 4":-- - ‘c, Page 17 of 20 3/7/2019 -- -- _.. =ate ��. 4:�- , op TestAmerica ' • a.--..a--s„ h, • .(.) • cN cc\ci) THF I FADFR IN FNVIRONMFNTAI TFSTIr, g E g s• W ORIGIN ID:GPZA (111) 111-1111 SHIP DATER 27FEB18 SAMPLE RECEIVING ACTFIGT: 15.00 LB MAN TITLE CAD: 388820/CAFE3211 7800 ZEST 27TH STREET SUITE 208 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55426 BILL RECIPIENT UNITED STATES US 3 TO SAMPLE RECEIVING =t TEST AMERICA ILI 880 RIVERSIDE PARKWAY ;n SACREMENTO CA 95605 cal6)87i-6888 Ur: nu: PQ, WTI II1 'IIIIIIINIINII!IIIIIUIIIIIIIUIli IIl I VIIIII11Ml I ` Fe_Et1Ex ' Cb ; i ro,t1. 1,.,-. ,!/fri lyi:,k. lio ,m', . i.,, , i E 1 co , 1 1% vc A, VI Mf p, N Y n . ir' ITS ', u r k , fr, ''s & b. t# THU - 28 FEB 10:30A y gig, 4114 9905 736 PRIORITY OVERNIGHT a y All BLUR CA—US SMF , , W . E ii. 4 r� (d r ry , ,,,, II 1 1,., I Q ,r „ , Page 18 of 20 3/7/2019 • i 1. • Ori cm to 14` uwe.ttour Pt iii, oz u.). 2 w WI H ti p- ..... a I a- y mi . ------r, ins OC 111111111111111111111111111110.1111111 =,. tee-`:_ E--- a- j Q • _. _- Y .� r X _ IMIIIIIIIMIIIIIIIIIIIIIMIMIIIIIMNNI LC? 14:11C "' */: Ci `� C� IWIQ(r kJ _ .- q'w_ c:::. gigE 5 *W 3,uiIpM; =I ...., >c ............ . .....,..... . . ^' _ =.' _ W minismiais cu,..12, 4 t 1.• • Page 19 of 20 3/7/2019 Login Sample Receipt Checklist Client: Wenck Associates, Inc Job Number: 320-47953-1 SDG Number: 320-47953-1 Login Number:47953 List Source:TestAmerica Sacramento List Number: 1 =_ Creator: Branscum, Cassie ' Question Answer Comment Radioactivity wasn't checked or is<1=background as measured by a survey True meter. The cooler's custody seal, if present, is intact. True 173829 Sample custody seals, if present,are intact. N/A The cooler or samples do not appear to have been compromised or True tampered with. Samples were received on ice. N/A Cooler Temperature is acceptable. N/A Cooler Temperature is recorded. N/A COC is present. True COC is filled out in ink and legible. True COC is filled out with all pertinent information. True Is the Field Sampler's name present on COC? True There are no discrepancies between the containers received and the COC. True Samples are received within Holding Time(excluding tests with immediate True HTs) Sample containers have legible labels. True Containers are not broken or leaking. True Sample collection date/times are provided. True Appropriate sample containers are used. True Sample bottles are completely filled. True Sample Preservation Verified. N/A There is sufficient vol. for all requested analyses, incl. any requested True MS/MSDs Containers requiring zero headspace have no headspace or bubble is True <6mm (1/4"). Multiphasic samples are not present. True Samples do not require splitting or compositing. True Residual Chlorine Checked. N/A TestAmerica Sacramento Page 20 of 20 3/7/2019 a fri" U . . . . . . . .. . _ .. ..,, .. ... . , ., . . . . . TestAmenca . , ,. . , . . , . . . , i.lx THE LEADER IN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING , r ANALYTICAL REPORT TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. TestAmerica Burlington 30 Community Drive Suite 11 South Burlington, VT 05403 Tel: (802)660-1990 ' .111. -- TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47602-1 • TestAmerica Sample Delivery Group: 200-47602-1 Client Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows For: ' Wenck Associates, Inc 1802 Wooddale Drive �; Suite 100 . Woodbury, Minnesota 55125 111 Attn: Michelle Hosfield , , , 1<l)iii/Vt^)tol')i)r-* ,, Authorized for release by: 3/7/2019 5:13:14 PM Kathryn Kelly, Project Manager II : ; `` 1 (802)923-1021 kathryn.kelly@testamericainc.com x I_, , resui s ro 9. Totc Access .°"' . , .. aV� Q e t j : w�' :: .. eF / _ l The test results in this report meet all 2003 NELAC and 2009 TNI requirements for accredited ' parameters, exceptions are noted in this report. This report may not be reproduced except in full, e� ; and with written approval from the laboratory.For questions please contact the Project Manager ' at the e-mail address or telephone number listed on this page. .,, ' ' ' :I4.:4.: , This report has been electronically signed and authorized by the signatory.Electronic signature is intended to be the legally binding equivalent of a traditionally handwritten signature. Visit us at: www.testamericainc.com Results relate only to the items tested and the sample(s)as received by the laboratory. � ..a Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47602-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG:200-47602-1 Table of Contents Cover Page 1 Table of Contents 2 Definitions/Glossary 3 Case Narrative 4 Detection Summary 5 Client Sample Results 9 QC Sample Results 29 QC Association Summary 34 Lab Chronicle 35 Certification Summary 38 Method Summary 39 Sample Summary 40 Chain of Custody 41 Receipt Checklists 44 Clean Canister Certification 45 Pre-Ship Certification 45 Clean Canister Data 50 • TestAmerica Burlington Page 2 of 407 3/7/2019 Definitions/Glossary Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47602-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 200-47602-1 QualifiersEl Air-GC/MS VOA Qualifier Qualifier Description U Indicates the analyte was analyzed for but not detected. .. J Result is less than the RL but greater than or equal to the MDL and the concentration is an approximate value. ,,'.•' Air-GC/MS VOA TICs Qualifier Qualifier Description J Indicates an Estimated Value for TICs N This flag indicates the presumptive evidence of a compound. Air-GC VOA Qualifier Qualifier Description U Indicates the analyte was analyzed for but not detected. Glossary Abbreviation These commonly used abbreviations may or may not be present in this report. Listed under the"D"column to designate that the result is reported on a dry weight basis %R Percent Recovery CFL Contains Free Liquid CNF Contains No Free Liquid DER Duplicate Error Ratio(normalized absolute difference) Dil Fac Dilution Factor DL Detection Limit(DoD/DOE) DL,RA,RE,IN Indicates a Dilution,Re-analysis,Re-extraction,or additional Initial metals/anion analysis of the sample LC Decision Level Concentration(Radiochemistry) DL Estimated Detection Limit(Dioxin) LOD Limit of Detection(DoD/DOE) LOQ Limit of Quantitation(DoD/DOE) MDA Minimum Detectable Activity(Radiochemistry) MDC Minimum Detectable Concentration(Radiochemistry) MDL Method Detection Limit ML Minimum Level(Dioxin) NC Not Calculated ND Not Detected at the reporting limit(or MDL or EDL if shown) PQL Practical Quantitation Limit QC Quality Control RER Relative Error Ratio(Radiochemistry) RL Reporting Limit or Requested Limit(Radiochemistry) RPD Relative Percent Difference,a measure of the relative difference between two points TEF Toxicity Equivalent Factor(Dioxin) TEQ Toxicity Equivalent Quotient(Dioxin) TestAmerica Burlington Page 3 of 407 3/7/2019 Case Narrative Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47602-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 200-47602-1 Job ID: 200-47602-1 Laboratory: TestAmerica Burlington 4 Narrative CASE NARRATIVE Client: Wenck Associates, Inc Project: Eisinger Meadows Report Number: 200-47602-1 With the exceptions noted as flags or footnotes,standard analytical protocols were followed in the analysis of the samples and no problems were encountered or anomalies observed. In addition all laboratory quality control samples were within established control limits,with any exceptions noted below. Each sample was analyzed to achieve the lowest possible reporting limit within the constraints of the method. In some cases, due to interference or analytes present at high concentrations,samples were diluted. For diluted samples, the reporting limits are adjusted relative to the dilution required. Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated results. All holding times were met and proper preservation noted for the methods performed on these samples, unless otherwise detailed in the individual sections below. RECEIPT The samples were received on 02/28/2019;the samples arrived in good condition. FIXED GASES Samples SV-1, SV-2, SV-4, SV-5, SV-6, SV-7, SV-8, SV-9, SV-10, SV-11, SV-12, SV-13 and SV-14 were analyzed for Fixed Gases in accordance with EPA Method 3C.The samples were analyzed on 03/05/2019 and 03/06/2019. Samples SV-1[1.36X], SV-2[1.48X], SV-4[1.41X], SV-5[1.37X], SV-6[1.58X], SV-7[1.41X], SV-8[1.47X], SV-9[1.57X], SV-10[1.46X], SV-11[1.54X], SV-12[1.52X], SV-13[1.59X]and SV-14[1.54X]required dilution prior to analysis. The reporting limits have been adjusted accordingly. No analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described above or in the Definitions/Glossary page. VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Samples SV-1, SV-2, SV-4,SV-5, SV-6, SV-7, SV-8, SV-9, SV-10, SV-11, SV-12, SV-13 and SV-14 were analyzed for Volatile Organic Compounds in accordance with EPA Method TO-15.The samples were analyzed on 03/06/2019 and 03/07/2019. Samples SV-1[10X], SV-2[10X], SV-4[10X], SV-5[10X],SV-6[10X],SV-7[10X], SV-8[10X], SV-9[10X], SV-10[10X], SV-11[10X], SV-12[10X], SV-13[10X]and SV-14[10X]required dilution prior to analysis. The reporting limits have been adjusted accordingly. No analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described above or in the Definitions/Glossary page. TestAmerica Burlington Page 4 of 407 3/7/219 Detection Summary Client Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47602-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 200-47602-1 Client Sample ID: SV-1 Lab Sample ID: 200-47602-1 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type Dichlorodifluoromethane 12 J 25 9.9 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA 1,3-Butadiene 3.9 J 4.4 1.4 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Ethanol 71 J 94 23 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA El Isopropyl alcohol 61 J 120 44 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Client Sample ID: SV-2 Lab Sample ID: 200-47602-2 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type Propylene 610 86 55 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA ,a._ 1,3-Butadiene 43 4.4 1.4 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Ethanol 36 J 94 23 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Acetone 64 J 120 62 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Isopropyl alcohol 45 J 120 44 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA n-Hexane 20 7.0 5.6 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Methyl Ethyl Ketone 7.1 J 15 5.9 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Cyclohexane 3.4 J 6.9 2.2 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Benzene 15 6.4 2.3 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA n-Heptane 5.7 J 8.2 5.7 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Toluene 5.2 J 7.5 2.6 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Client Sample ID: SV-4 Lab Sample ID: 200-47602-3 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type 1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 60 14 4.8 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA 1,3-Butadiene 8.0 4.4 1.4 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Ethanol 56 J 94 23 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA n-Hexane 9.1 7.0 5.6 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Methyl Ethyl Ketone 6.4 J 15 5.9 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Benzene 4.0 J 6.4 2.3 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Toluene 3.0 J 7.5 2.6 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Analyte Result Qualifier RL RL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type Methane 1.2 0.056 0.056 %v/v 1.41 EPA 3C Total/NA Client Sample ID: SV-5 Lab Sample ID: 200-47602-4 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type 1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 75 14 4.8 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA 1,3-Butadiene 12 4.4 1.4 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Ethanol 64 J 94 23 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Acetone 120 120 62 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Isopropyl alcohol 55 J 120 44 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Carbon disulfide 6.8 J 16 3.7 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA n-Hexane 20 7.0 5.6 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Methyl Ethyl Ketone 14 J 15 5.9 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Cyclohexane 9.2 6.9 2.2 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Benzene 8.0 6.4 2.3 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA n-Heptane 6.7 J 8.2 5.7 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Toluene 3.1 J 7.5 2.6 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Analyte Result Qualifier RL RL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type Methane 3.8 0.055 0.055 %v/v 1.37 EPA 3C Total/NA his Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results. TestAmerica Burlington Page 5 of 407 3/7/2019 Detection Summary Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47602-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 200-47602-1 Client Sample ID: SV-6 Lab Sample ID: 200-47602-5 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type Dichlorodifluoromethane 16 J 25 9.9 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA 1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 79 14 4.8 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA 1,3-Butadiene 24 4.4 1.4 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA 0 Ethanol 23 J 94 23 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Acetone 110 J 120 62 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Carbon disulfide 38 16 3.7 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA n-Hexane 24 7.0 5.6 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA 1,1-Dichloroethane 1.1 J 8.1 1.1 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Methyl Ethyl Ketone 6.1 J 15 5.9 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Cyclohexane 5.4 J 6.9 2.2 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Benzene 15 6.4 2.3 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA n-Heptane 6.0 J 8.2 5.7 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Toluene 4.7 J 7.5 2.6 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Analyte Result Qualifier RL RL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type Methane 0.89 0.063 0.063 %v/v 1.58 EPA 3C Total/NA Client Sample ID: SV-7 Lab Sample ID: 200-47602-6 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type . '- Propylene 200 86 55 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Dichlorodifluoromethane 25 25 9.9 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA 1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 110 14 4.8 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA 1,3-Butadiene 21 4.4 1.4 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Ethanol 58 J 94 23 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA n-Hexane 8.8 7.0 5.6 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Benzene 7.3 6.4 2.3 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Toluene 3.2 J 7.5 2.6 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Client Sample ID: SV-8 Lab Sample ID: 200-47602-7 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type 1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 15 14 4.8 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA 1,3-Butadiene 23 4.4 1.4 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Ethanol 55 J 94 23 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Acetone 130 120 62 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Carbon disulfide 7.2 J 16 3.7 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA n-Hexane 19 7.0 5.6 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Ethyl acetate 180 180 40 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Methyl Ethyl Ketone 14 J 15 5.9 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Benzene 7.8 6.4 2.3 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Toluene 4.3 J 7.5 2.6 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Analyte Result Qualifier RL RL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type Methane 0.47 0.059 0.059 %v/v 1.47 EPA 3C Total/NA Client Sample ID: SV-9 Lab Sample ID: 200-47602-8 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type 1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 760 14 4.8 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Chloromethane 100 10 5.2 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA 1,3-Butadiene 5.4 4.4 1.4 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA This Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results. TestAmerica Burlington Page 6 of 407 3/7/2019 Detection Summary Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47602-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 200-47602-1 Client Sample ID: SV-9 (Continued) Lab Sample ID: 200-47602-8 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type Ethanol 47 J 94 23 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Carbon disulfide 4.9 J 16 3.7 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Ell n-Hexane 42 7.0 5.6 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Methyl Ethyl Ketone 8.1 J 15 5.9 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Cyclohexane 20 6.9 2.2 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Benzene 3.3 J 6.4 2.3 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA n-Heptane 7.2 J 8.2 5.7 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Analyte Result Qualifier RL RL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type Methane 30 0.063 0.063 %v/v 1.57 EPA 3C Total/NA Client Sample ID: SV-10 Lab Sample ID: 200-47602-9 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type Dichlorodifluoromethane 130 25 9.9 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA 1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 180 14 4.8 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Trichlorofluoromethane 64 11 3.5 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Ethanol 37 J 94 23 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA n-Hexane 6.3 J 7.0 5.6 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Trichloroethene 2.7 J 11 1.6 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA3:; Tetrachloroethene 3.8 J 14 2.0 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Client Sample ID: SV-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-47602-10 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type Dichlorodifluoromethane 110 25 9.9 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA 1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 330 14 4.8 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA 1,3-Butadiene 1.9 J 4.4 1.4 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Trichlorofluoromethane 10 J 11 3.5 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Ethanol 32 J 94 23 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA n-Hexane 26 7.0 5.6 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Cyclohexane 7.0 6.9 2.2 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Benzene 4.7 J 6.4 2.3 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA n-Heptane 7.9 J 8.2 5.7 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Toluene 2.7 J 7.5 2.6 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Analyte Result Qualifier RL RL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type Methane 1.6 0.062 0.062 %v/v 1.54 EPA 3C Total/NA Client Sample ID: SV-12 Lab Sample ID: 200-47602-11 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type Dichlorodifluoromethane 180 25 9.9 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA 1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 380 14 4.8 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Vinyl chloride 55 5.1 1.0 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Chloroethane 24 13 5.5 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Ethanol 49 J 94 23 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA 1,1-Dichloroethene 2.4 J 7.9 1.3 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 3.0 J 7.9 2.9 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA n-Hexane 170 7.0 5.6 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA 1,1-Dichloroethane 60 8.1 1.1 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 28 7.9 1.5 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA his Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results. TestAmerica Burlington Page 7 of 407 3/7/2019 Detection Summary Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47602-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 200-47602-1 Client Sample ID: SV-12 (Continued) Lab Sample ID: 200-47602-11 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 4.7 J 11 3.7 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Cyclohexane 47 6.9 2.2 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Benzene 42 6.4 2.3 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA 0 1,2-Dichloroethane 12 8.1 2.5 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA n-Heptane 36 8.2 5.7 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Trichloroethene 13 11 1.6 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Toluene 8.8 7.5 2.6 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Analyte Result Qualifier RL RL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type Methane 11 0.061 0.061 %v/v 1.52 EPA 3C Total/NA Client Sample ID: SV-13 Lab Sample ID: 200-47602-12 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type Propylene 220 86 55 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Dichlorodifluoromethane 32 25 9.9 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA 1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 80 14 4.8 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA 1,3-Butadiene 18 4.4 1.4 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Ethanol 30 J 94 23 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Acetone 93 J 120 62 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA N• Carbon disulfide 6.6 J 16 3.7 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Li n-Hexane 7.3 7.0 5.6 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Methyl Ethyl Ketone 10 J 15 5.9 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Benzene 4.9 J 6.4 2.3 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Analyte Result Qualifier RL RL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type Methane 0.22 0.064 0.064 %v/v 1.59 EPA 3C Total/NA Client Sample ID: SV-14 Lab Sample ID: 200-47602-13 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type Propylene 91 86 55 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA 1,3-Butadiene 10 4.4 1.4 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Ethanol 33 J 94 23 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Acetone 270 120 62 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Methyl Ethyl Ketone 26 15 5.9 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA Benzene 3.8 J 6.4 2.3 ug/m3 10 TO-15 Total/NA This Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results. TestAmerica Burlington Page 8 of 407 3/7/2019 Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47602-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 200-47602-1 :tient Sample ID: SV-1 Lab Sample ID: 200-47602-1 Date Collected: 02/27/19 09:22 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 10:33 Sample Container: Summa Canister 1L ps .:., Method: TO-15-Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air rola Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Propylene 86 U 86 55 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 6 Dichlorodifluoromethane 12 J 25 9.9 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 14 U 14 4.8 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 Chloromethane 10 U 10 5.2 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 Vinyl chloride 5.1 U 5.1 1.0 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 1,3-Butadiene 3.9 J 4.4 1.4 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 Bromomethane 7.8 U 7.8 2.4 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 Chloroethane 13 U 13 5.5 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 Trichlorofluoromethane 11 U 11 3.5 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 Ethanol 71 J 94 23 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 Freon TF 15 U 15 2.4 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 1,1-Dichloroethene 7.9 U 7.9 1.3 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 Acetone 120 U 120 62 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 Isopropyl alcohol 61 J 120 44 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 Carbon disulfide 16 U 16 3.7 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 Methylene Chloride 17 U 17 6.9 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 Methyl tert-butyl ether 7.2 U 7.2 2.2 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 7.9 U 7.9 2.9 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 n-Hexane 7.0 U 7.0 5.6 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 1,1-Dichloroethane 8.1 U 8.1 1.1 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 Vinyl acetate 180 U 180 81 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 Ethyl acetate 180 U 180 40 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 Methyl Ethyl Ketone 15 U 15 5.9 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 7.9 U 7.9 1.5 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 Chloroform 9.8 U 9.8 2.5 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 Tetrahydrofuran 150 U 150 77 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 11 U 11 3.7 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 Cyclohexane 6.9 U 6.9 2.2 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 Carbon tetrachloride 13 U 13 1.5 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 Benzene 6.4 U 6.4 2.3 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 1,2-Dichloroethane 8.1 U 8.1 2.5 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 n-Heptane 8.2 U 8.2 5.7 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 Trichloroethene 11 U 11 1.6 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 1,2-Dichloropropane 9.2 U 9.2 5.5 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 Bromodichloromethane 13 U 13 6.3 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 9.1 U 9.1 4.4 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 Methyl isobutyl ketone 20 U 20 15 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 Toluene 7.5 U 7.5 2.6 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 9.1 U 9.1 5.4 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 11 U 11 4.3 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 Tetrachloroethene 14 U 14 2.0 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 Methyl Butyl Ketone(2-Hexanone) 20 U 20 17 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 1,2-Dibromoethane 15 U 15 5.3 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 Chlorobenzene 9.2 U 9.2 1.8 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 Ethylbenzene 8.7 U 8.7 3.2 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 m,p-Xylene 22 U 22 3.0 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 Xylene,o- 8.7 U 8.7 3.1 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 Styrene 8.5 U 8.5 3.7 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 TestAmerica Burlington Page 9 of 407 3/7/2019 Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47602-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 200-47602-1 Client Sample ID: SV-1 Lab Sample ID: 200-47602-1 Date Collected: 02/27/19 09:22 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 10:33 Sample Container: Summa Canister 1L Method: TO-15 -Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air(Continued) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Bromoform 21 U 21 8.9 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 6 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 14 U 14 5.2 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 4-Ethyltoluene 9.8 U 9.8 3.4 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 9.8 U 9.8 2.9 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 9.8 U 9.8 3.9 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 12 U 12 4.9 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 12 U 12 3.9 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 Benzyl chloride 10 U 10 6.2 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 12 U 12 4.3 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 37 U 37 18 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 Hexachlorobutadiene 21 U 21 8.7 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 Naphthalene 26 U 26 16 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 Dibromochloromethane 17 U 17 6.0 ug/m3 03/06/19 23:39 10 Tentatively Identified Compound Est.Result Qualifier Unit D RT CAS No. Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Tentatively Identified Compound None ppb v/v 03/06/192a39 10 ,. Method: EPA 3C -Fixed Gases from Stationary Sources Analyte Result Qualifier RL RL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Methane 0.054 U 0.054 0.054 %v/v 03/05/19 20:08 1.36 Client Sample ID: SV-2 Lab Sample ID: 200-47602-2 Date Collected: 02/27/19 10:59 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 10:33 Sample Container: Summa Canister 1L Method: TO-15 -Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Propylene 610 86 55 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 Dichlorodifluoromethane 25 U 25 9.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 14 U 14 4.8 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 Chloromethane 10 U 10 5.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 Vinyl chloride 5.1 U 5.1 1.0 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 1,3-Butadiene 43 4.4 1.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 Bromomethane 7.8 U 7.8 2.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 Chloroethane 13 U 13 5.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 Trichlorofluoromethane 11 U 11 3.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 Ethanol 36 J 94 23 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 Freon TF 15 U 15 2.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 1,1-Dichloroethene 7.9 U 7.9 1.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 Acetone 64 J 120 62 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 Isopropyl alcohol 45 J 120 44 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 Carbon disulfide 16 U 16 3.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 Methylene Chloride 17 U 17 6.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 Methyl tert-butyl ether 7.2 U 7.2 2.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 7.9 U 7.9 2.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 n-Hexane 20 7.0 5.6 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 1,1-Dichloroethane 8.1 U 8.1 1.1 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 Vinyl acetate 180 U 180 81 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 TestAmerica Burlington Page 10 of 407 3/7/2019 Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47602-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 200-47602-1 :tient Sample ID: SV-2 Lab Sample ID: 200-47602-2 Date Collected: 02/27/19 10:59 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 10:33 Sample Container: Summa Canister 1L Method: TO-15 -Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air(Continued) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac - Ethyl acetate 180 U 180 40 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 6 Methyl Ethyl Ketone 7.1 J 15 5.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 7.9 U 7.9 1.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 Chloroform 9.8 U 9.8 2.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 Tetrahydrofuran 150 U 150 77 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 11 U 11 3.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 Cyclohexane 3.4 J 6.9 2.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 Carbon tetrachloride 13 U 13 1.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 Benzene 15 6.4 2.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 1,2-Dichloroethane 8.1 U 8.1 2.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 n-Heptane 5.7 J 8.2 5.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 Trichloroethene 11 U 11 1.6 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 1,2-Dichloropropane 9.2 U 9.2 5.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 Bromodichloromethane 13 U 13 6.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 9.1 U 9.1 4.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 Methyl isobutyl ketone 20 U 20 15 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 Toluene 5.2 J 7.5 2.6 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 9.1 U 9.1 5.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 11 U 11 4.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 Tetrachloroethene 14 U 14 2.0 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 Methyl Butyl Ketone(2-Hexanone) 20 U 20 17 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 1,2-Dibromoethane 15 U 15 5.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 Chlorobenzene 9.2 U 9.2 1.8 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 Ethylbenzene 8.7 U 8.7 3.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 m,p-Xylene 22 U 22 3.0 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 Xylene,o- 8.7 U 8.7 3.1 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 Styrene 8.5 U 8.5 3.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 Bromoform 21 U 21 8.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 14 U 14 5.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 4-Ethyltoluene 9.8 U 9.8 3.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 9.8 U 9.8 2.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 9.8 U 9.8 3.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 12 U 12 4.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 12 U 12 3.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 Benzyl chloride 10 U 10 6.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 12 U 12 4.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 37 U 37 18 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 Hexachlorobutadiene 21 U 21 8.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 Naphthalene 26 U 26 16 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 Dibromochloromethane 17 U 17 6.0 ug/m3 03/07/19 01:25 10 Tentatively Identified Compound Est.Result Qualifier Unit D RT CAS No. Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Allene 12 J N ppb v/v 3.20 463-49-0 03/07/19 01:25 10 Unknown 15 J ppb v/v 3.61 03/07/19 01:25 10 Method: EPA 3C - Fixed Gases from Stationary Sources Analyte Result Qualifier RL RL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Methane 0.059 U 0.059 0.059 %v/v 03/05/19 20:56 1.48 TestAmerica Burlington Page 11 of 407 3/7/2019 Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47602-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 200-47602-1 Client Sample ID: SV-4 Lab Sample ID: 200-47602-3 Date Collected: 02/27/19 11:33 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 10:33 Sample Container: Summa Canister 1L e Method: TO-15 -Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac `.. Propylene 86 U 86 55 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 6 Dichlorodifluoromethane 25 U 25 9.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 60 14 4.8 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 Chloromethane 10 U 10 5.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 Vinyl chloride 5.1 U 5.1 1.0 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 1,3-Butadiene 8.0 4.4 1.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 Bromomethane 7.8 U 7.8 2.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 Chloroethane 13 U 13 5.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 Trichlorofluoromethane 11 U 11 3.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 Ethanol 56 J 94 23 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 Freon TF 15 U 15 2.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 1,1-Dichloroethene 7.9 U 7.9 1.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 Acetone 120 U 120 62 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 Isopropyl alcohol 120 U 120 44 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 Carbon disulfide 16 U 16 3.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 Methylene Chloride 17 U 17 6.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 Methyl tert-butyl ether 7.2 U 7.2 2.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 7.9 U 7.9 2.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 n-Hexane 9.1 7.0 5.6 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 1,1-Dichloroethane 8.1 U 8.1 1.1 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 Vinyl acetate 180 U 180 81 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 Ethyl acetate 180 U 180 40 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 Methyl Ethyl Ketone 6.4 J 15 5.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 7.9 U 7.9 1.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 Chloroform 9.8 U 9.8 2.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 Tetrahydrofuran 150 U 150 77 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 11 U 11 3.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 Cyclohexane 6.9 U 6.9 2.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 Carbon tetrachloride 13 U 13 1.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 Benzene 4.0 J 6.4 2.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 1,2-Dichloroethane 8.1 U 8.1 2.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 n-Heptane 8.2 U 8.2 5.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 Trichloroethene 11 U 11 1.6 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 1,2-Dichloropropane 9.2 U 9.2 5.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 Bromodichloromethane 13 U 13 6.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 9.1 U 9.1 4.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 Methyl isobutyl ketone 20 U 20 15 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 Toluene 3.0 J 7.5 2.6 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 9.1 U 9.1 5.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 11 U 11 4.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 Tetrachloroethene 14 U 14 2.0 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 Methyl Butyl Ketone(2-Hexanone) 20 U 20 17 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 1,2-Dibromoethane 15 U 15 5.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 Chlorobenzene 9.2 U 9.2 1.8 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 Ethylbenzene 8.7 U 8.7 3.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 m,p-Xylene 22 U 22 3.0 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 Xylene,o- 8.7 U 8.7 3.1 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 Styrene 8.5 U 8.5 3.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 TestAmerica Burlington Page 12 of 407 3/7/2019 Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47602-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 200-47602-1 Client Sample ID: SV-4 Lab Sample ID: 200-47602-3 Date Collected: 02/27/19 11:33 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 10:33 Sample Container: Summa Canister 1L i. Method: TO-15 -Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air(Continued) £ Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Bromoform 21 U 21 8.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 6 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 14 U 14 5.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 4-Ethyltoluene 9.8 U 9.8 3.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 9.8 U 9.8 2.9 ug/m3 03/07/1902:18 10 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 9.8 U 9.8 3.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 12 U 12 4.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 12 U 12 3.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 Benzyl chloride 10 U 10 6.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 12 U 12 4.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 37 U 37 18 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 Hexachlorobutadiene 21 U 21 8.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 Naphthalene 26 U 26 16 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 Dibromochloromethane 17 U 17 6.0 ug/m3 03/07/19 02:18 10 Tentatively Identified Compound Est.Result Qualifier Unit D RT CAS No. Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Unknown 25 J ppb v/v 3.61 03/07/19 02:18 10 ;, Method: EPA 3C - Fixed Gases from Stationary Sources Analyte Result Qualifier RL RL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Methane 1.2 0.056 0.056 %v/v 03/05/19 21:44 1.41 :tient Sample ID: SV-5 Lab Sample ID: 200-47602-4 Date Collected: 02/27/19 12:13 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 10:33 Sample Container: Summa Canister 1L Method: TO-15 -Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Propylene 86 U 86 55 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 Dichlorodifluoromethane 25 U 25 9.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 75 14 4.8 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 Chloromethane 10 U 10 5.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 Vinyl chloride 5.1 U 5.1 1.0 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 1,3-Butadiene 12 4.4 1.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 Bromomethane 7.8 U 7.8 2.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 Chloroethane 13 U 13 5.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 Trichlorofluoromethane 11 U 11 3.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 Ethanol 64 J 94 23 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 Freon TF 15 U 15 2.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 1,1-Dichloroethene 7.9 U 7.9 1.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 Acetone 120 120 62 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 Isopropyl alcohol 55 J 120 44 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 Carbon disulfide 6.8 J 16 3.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 Methylene Chloride 17 U 17 6.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 Methyl tert-butyl ether 7.2 U 7.2 2.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 7.9 U 7.9 2.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 n-Hexane 20 7.0 5.6 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 1,1-Dichloroethane 8.1 U 8.1 1.1 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 Vinyl acetate 180 U 180 81 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 TestAmerica Burlington Page 13 of 407 3/7/2019 Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47602-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 200-47602-1 Client Sample ID: SV-5 Lab Sample ID: 200-47602-4 Date Collected: 02/27/19 12:13 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 10:33 Sample Container: Summa Canister 1L Method: TO-15 -Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air(Continued) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Ethyl acetate 180 U 180 40 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 6 Methyl Ethyl Ketone 14 J 15 5.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 7.9 U 7.9 1.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 Chloroform 9.8 U 9.8 2.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 Tetrahydrofuran 150 U 150 77 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 11 U 11 3.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 Cyclohexane 9.2 6.9 2.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 Carbon tetrachloride 13 U 13 1.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 Benzene 8.0 6.4 2.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 1,2-Dichloroethane 8.1 U 8.1 2.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 n-Heptane 6.7 J 8.2 5.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 Trichloroethene 11 U 11 1.6 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 1,2-Dichloropropane 9.2 U 9.2 5.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 Bromodichloromethane 13 U 13 6.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 9.1 U 9.1 4.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 Methyl isobutyl ketone 20 U 20 15 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 Toluene 3.1 J 7.5 2.6 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 9.1 U 9.1 5.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 11 U 11 4.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 Tetrachloroethene 14 U 14 2.0 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 Methyl Butyl Ketone(2-Hexanone) 20 U 20 17 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 1,2-Dibromoethane 15 U 15 5.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 Chlorobenzene 9.2 U 9.2 1.8 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 Ethylbenzene 8.7 U 8.7 3.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 m,p-Xylene 22 U 22 3.0 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 Xylene,o- 8.7 U 8.7 3.1 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 Styrene 8.5 U 8.5 3.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 Bromoform 21 U 21 8.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 14 U 14 5.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 4-Ethyltoluene 9.8 U 9.8 3.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 9.8 U 9.8 2.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 9.8 U 9.8 3.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 12 U 12 4.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 12 U 12 3.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 Benzyl chloride 10 U 10 6.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 12 U 12 4.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 37 U 37 18 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 Hexachlorobutadiene 21 U 21 8.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 Naphthalene 26 U 26 16 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 Dibromochloromethane 17 U 17 6.0 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:05 10 Tentatively Identified Compound Est.Result Qualifier Unit D RT CAS No. Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Butane,2-methyl- 33 J N ppb v/v 4.71 78-78-4 03/07/19 04:05 10 Pentane 11 J N ppb v/v 5.27 109-66-0 03/07/19 04:05 10 Method: EPA 3C - Fixed Gases from Stationary Sources Analyte Result Qualifier RL RL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Methane 3.8 0.055 0.055 %v/v 03/05/19 22:32 1.37 TestAmerica Burlington Page 14 of 407 3/7/2019 Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47602-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 200-47602-1 Client Sample ID: SV-6 Lab Sample ID: 200-47602-5 Date Collected: 02/27/19 12:40 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 10:33 Sample Container: Summa Canister 1L Method: TO-15 -Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Propylene 86 U 86 55 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 6 Dichlorodifluoromethane 16 J 25 9.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 79 14 4.8 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 Chloromethane 10 U 10 5.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 Vinyl chloride 5.1 U 5.1 1.0 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 1,3-Butadiene 24 4.4 1.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 Bromomethane 7.8 U 7.8 2.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 Chloroethane 13 U 13 5.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 Trichlorofluoromethane 11 U 11 3.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 Ethanol 23 J 94 23 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 Freon TF 15 U 15 2.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 1,1-Dichloroethene 7.9 U 7.9 1.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 Acetone 110 J 120 62 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 Isopropyl alcohol 120 U 120 44 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 Carbon disulfide 38 16 3.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 it;:. Methylene Chloride 17 U 17 6.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 £' Methyl tert-butyl ether 7.2 U 7.2 2.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 7.9 U 7.9 2.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 n-Hexane 24 7.0 5.6 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 1,1-Dichloroethane 1.1 J 8.1 1.1 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 Vinyl acetate 180 U 180 81 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 Ethyl acetate 180 U 180 40 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 Methyl Ethyl Ketone 6.1 J 15 5.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 7.9 U 7.9 1.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 Chloroform 9.8 U 9.8 2.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 Tetrahydrofuran 150 U 150 77 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 11 U 11 3.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 Cyclohexane 5.4 J 6.9 2.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 Carbon tetrachloride 13 U 13 1.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 Benzene 15 6.4 2.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 1,2-Dichloroethane 8.1 U 8.1 2.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 n-Heptane 6.0 J 8.2 5.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 Trichloroethene 11 U 11 1.6 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 1,2-Dichloropropane 9.2 U 9.2 5.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 Bromodichloromethane 13 U 13 6.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 9.1 U 9.1 4.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 Methyl isobutyl ketone 20 U 20 15 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 Toluene 4.7 J 7.5 2.6 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 9.1 U 9.1 5.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 11 U 11 4.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 Tetrachloroethene 14 U 14 2.0 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 Methyl Butyl Ketone(2-Hexanone) 20 U 20 17 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 1,2-Dibromoethane 15 U 15 5.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 Chlorobenzene 9.2 U 9.2 1.8 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 Ethylbenzene 8.7 U 8.7 3.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 m,p-Xylene 22 U 22 3.0 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 Xylene,o- 8.7 U 8.7 3.1 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 Styrene 8.5 U 8.5 3.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 TestAmerica Burlington Page 15 of 407 3/7/2019 Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47602-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 200-47602-1 Client Sample ID: SV-6 Lab Sample ID: 200-47602-5 Date Collected: 02/27/19 12:40 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 10:33 Sample Container: Summa Canister 1L Method: TO-15 -Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air(Continued) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Bromoform 21 U 21 8.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 6 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 14 U 14 5.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 4-Ethyltoluene 9.8 U 9.8 3.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 9.8 U 9.8 2.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 9.8 U 9.8 3.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 12 U 12 4.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 12 U 12 3.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 Benzyl chloride 10 U 10 6.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 12 U 12 4.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 37 U 37 18 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 Hexachlorobutadiene 21 U 21 8.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 Naphthalene 26 U 26 16 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 Dibromochloromethane 17 U 17 6.0 ug/m3 03/07/19 04:58 10 Tentatively Identified Compound Est.Result Qualifier Unit D RT CAS No. Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Butane, 2-methyl- 16 J N ppb v/v 4.71 78-78-4 03/07/19 04:58 10 Pentane 24 J N ppb v/v 5.27 109-66-0 03/07/19 04:58 10 Method: EPA 3C -Fixed Gases from Stationary Sources Analyte Result Qualifier RL RL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Methane 0.89 0.063 0.063 %v/v 03/05/19 23:20 1.58 Client Sample ID: SV-7 Lab Sample ID: 200-47602-6 Date Collected: 02/27/19 12:47 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 10:33 Sample Container: Summa Canister 1L Method: TO-15 -Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Propylene 200 86 55 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 Dichlorodifluoromethane 25 25 9.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 110 14 4.8 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 Chloromethane 10 U 10 5.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 Vinyl chloride 5.1 U 5.1 1.0 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 1,3-Butadiene 21 4.4 1.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 Bromomethane 7.8 U 7.8 2.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 Chloroethane 13 U 13 5.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 Trichlorofluoromethane 11 U 11 3.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 Ethanol 58 J 94 23 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 Freon TF 15 U 15 2.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 1,1-Dichloroethene 7.9 U 7.9 1.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 Acetone 120 U 120 62 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 Isopropyl alcohol 120 U 120 44 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 Carbon disulfide 16 U 16 3.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 Methylene Chloride 17 U 17 6.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 Methyl tert-butyl ether 7.2 U 7.2 2.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 7.9 U 7.9 2.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 n-Hexane 8.8 7.0 5.6 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 1,1-Dichloroethane 8.1 U 8.1 1.1 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 TestAmerica Burlington Page 16 of 407 3/7/2019 ............... Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47602-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 200-47602-1 :Tient Sample ID: SV-7 Lab Sample ID: 200-47602-6 Date Collected: 02/27/19 12:47 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 10:33 Sample Container: Summa Canister 1L Method: TO-15 -Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air(Continued) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Vinyl acetate 180 U 180 81 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 6 Ethyl acetate 180 U 180 40 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 Methyl Ethyl Ketone 15 U 15 5.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 7.9 U 7.9 1.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 Chloroform 9.8 U 9.8 2.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 Tetrahydrofuran 150 U 150 77 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 11 U 11 3.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 Cyclohexane 6.9 U 6.9 2.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 Carbon tetrachloride 13 U 13 1.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 Benzene 7.3 6.4 2.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 1,2-Dichloroethane 8.1 U 8.1 2.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 n-Heptane 8.2 U 8.2 5.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 Trichloroethene 11 U 11 1.6 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 1,2-Dichloropropane 9.2 U 9.2 5.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 Bromodichloromethane 13 U 13 6.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 _ cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 9.1 U 9.1 4.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 Methyl isobutyl ketone 20 U 20 15 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 Toluene 3.2 J 7.5 2.6 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 9.1 U 9.1 5.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 11 U 11 4.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 Tetrachloroethene 14 U 14 2.0 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 Methyl Butyl Ketone(2-Hexanone) 20 U 20 17 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 1,2-Dibromoethane 15 U 15 5.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 Chlorobenzene 9.2 U 9.2 1.8 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 Ethylbenzene 8.7 U 8.7 3.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 m,p-Xylene 22 U 22 3.0 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 Xylene,o- 8.7 U 8.7 3.1 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 Styrene 8.5 U 8.5 3.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 Bromoform 21 U 21 8.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 14 U 14 5.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 4-Ethyltoluene 9.8 U 9.8 3.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 9.8 U 9.8 2.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 9.8 U 9.8 3.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 12 U 12 4.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 12 U 12 3.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 Benzyl chloride 10 U 10 6.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 12 U 12 4.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 37 U 37 18 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 Hexachlorobutadiene 21 U 21 8.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 Naphthalene 26 U 26 16 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 Dibromochloromethane 17 U 17 6.0 ug/m3 03/07/19 07:37 10 Tentatively Identified Compound Est.Result Qualifier Unit D RT CAS No. Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 1-Propene, 2-methyl- 22 J N ppb v/v 3.59 115-11-7 03/07/19 07:37 10 Method: EPA 3C - Fixed Gases from Stationary Sources Analyte Result Qualifier RL RL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Methane 0.056 U 0.056 0.056 %v/v 03/06/19 00:09 1.41 TestAmerica Burlington Page 17 of 407 3/7/2019 Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47602-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 200-47602-1 Client Sample ID: SV-8 Lab Sample ID: 200-47602-7 Date Collected: 02/27/19 13:30 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 10:33 Sample Container: Summa Canister 1L Method: TO-15 -Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Oil Fac Propylene 86 U 86 55 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 6 Dichlorodifluoromethane 25 U 25 9.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 15 14 4.8 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 Chloromethane 10 U 10 5.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 Vinyl chloride 5.1 U 5.1 1.0 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 1,3-Butadiene 23 4.4 1.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 Bromomethane 7.8 U 7.8 2.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 Chloroethane 13 U 13 5.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 Trichlorofluoromethane 11 U 11 3.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 Ethanol 55 J 94 23 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 Freon TF 15 U 15 2.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 1,1-Dichloroethene 7.9 U 7.9 1.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 Acetone 130 120 62 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 Isopropyl alcohol 120 U 120 44 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 Carbon disulfide 7.2 J 16 3.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 Methylene Chloride 17 U 17 6.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 Methyl tert-butyl ether 7.2 U 7.2 2.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 7.9 U 7.9 2.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 n-Hexane 19 7.0 5.6 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 1 1,1-Dichloroethane 8.1 U 8.1 1.1 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 Vinyl acetate 180 U 180 81 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 Ethyl acetate 180 180 40 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 Methyl Ethyl Ketone 14 J 15 5.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 7.9 U 7.9 1.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 Chloroform 9.8 U 9.8 2.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 Tetrahydrofuran 150 U 150 77 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 11 U 11 3.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 Cyclohexane 6.9 U 6.9 2.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 Carbon tetrachloride 13 U 13 1.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 Benzene 7.8 6.4 2.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 1,2-Dichloroethane 8.1 U 8.1 2.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 n-Heptane 8.2 U 8.2 5.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 Trichloroethene 11 U 11 1.6 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 1,2-Dichloropropane 9.2 U 9.2 5.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 Bromodichloromethane 13 U 13 6.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 9.1 U 9.1 4.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 Methyl isobutyl ketone 20 U 20 15 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 Toluene 4.3 J 7.5 2.6 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 9.1 U 9.1 5.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 11 U 11 4.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 Tetrachloroethene 14 U 14 2.0 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 Methyl Butyl Ketone(2-Hexanone) 20 U 20 17 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 1,2-Dibromoethane 15 U 15 5.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 Chlorobenzene 9.2 U 9.2 1.8 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 Ethylbenzene 8.7 U 8.7 3.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 m,p-Xylene 22 U 22 3.0 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 Xylene,o- 8.7 U 8.7 3.1 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 Styrene 8.5 U 8.5 3.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 TestAmerica Burlington Page 18 of 407 3/7/2019 Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47602-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 200-47602-1 :tient Sample ID: SV-8 Lab Sample ID: 200-47602-7 Date Collected: 02/27/19 13:30 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 10:33 Sample Container: Summa Canister 1L Method: TO-15 -Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air(Continued) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac - Bromoform 21 U 21 8.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 6 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 14 U 14 5.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 4-Ethyltoluene 9.8 U 9.8 3.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 9.8 U 9.8 2.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 9.8 U 9.8 3.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 12 U 12 4.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 12 U 12 3.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 Benzyl chloride 10 U 10 6.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 12 U 12 4.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 37 U 37 18 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 Hexachlorobutadiene 21 U 21 8.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 Naphthalene 26 U 26 16 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 Dibromochloromethane 17 U 17 6.0 ug/m3 03/07/19 05:51 10 Tentatively Identified Compound Est.Result Qualifier Unit D RT CAS No. Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Tentatively Identified Compound None ppb v/v 03/07/19 05:51 10 Method: EPA 3C - Fixed Gases from Stationary Sources Analyte Result Qualifier RL RL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Methane 0.47 0.059 0.059 %v/v 03/06/19 01:00 1.47 :tient Sample ID: SV-9 Lab Sample ID: 200-47602-8 Date Collected: 02/27/19 14:04 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 10:33 Sample Container: Summa Canister 1L Method: TO-15 -Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Propylene 86 U 86 55 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 Dichlorodifluoromethane 25 U 25 9.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 760 14 4.8 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 Chloromethane 100 10 5.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 Vinyl chloride 5.1 U 5.1 1.0 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 1,3-Butadiene 5.4 4.4 1.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 Bromomethane 7.8 U 7.8 2.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 Chloroethane 13 U 13 5.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 Trichlorofluoromethane 11 U 11 3.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 Ethanol 47 J 94 23 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 Freon TF 15 U 15 2.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 1,1-Dichloroethene 7.9 U 7.9 1.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 Acetone 120 U 120 62 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 Isopropyl alcohol 120 U 120 44 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 Carbon disulfide 4.9 J 16 3.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 Methylene Chloride 17 U 17 6.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 Methyl tert-butyl ether 7.2 U 7.2 2.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 7.9 U 7.9 2.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 n-Hexane 42 7.0 5.6 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 1,1-Dichloroethane 8.1 U 8.1 1.1 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 Vinyl acetate 180 U 180 81 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 TestAmerica Burlington Page 19 of 407 3/7/2019 Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47602-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 200-47602-1 Client Sample ID: SV-9 Lab Sample ID: 200-47602-8 Date Collected: 02/27/19 14:04 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 10:33 Sample Container: Summa Canister 1L Method: TO-15-Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air(Continued) ..;; Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Ethyl acetate 180 U 180 40 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 6 Methyl Ethyl Ketone 8.1 J 15 5.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 7.9 U 7.9 1.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 Chloroform 9.8 U 9.8 2.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 Tetrahydrofuran 150 U 150 77 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 11 U 11 3.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 Cyclohexane 20 6.9 2.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 Carbon tetrachloride 13 U 13 1.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 Benzene 3.3 J 6.4 2.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 1,2-Dichloroethane 8.1 U 8.1 2.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 n-Heptane 7.2 J 8.2 5.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 Trichloroethene 11 U 11 1.6 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 1,2-Dichloropropane 9.2 U 9.2 5.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 Bromodichloromethane 13 U 13 6.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 9.1 U 9.1 4.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 Methyl isobutyl ketone 20 U 20 15 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 Toluene 7.5 U 7.5 2.6 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 9.1 U 9.1 5.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 11 U 11 4.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 Tetrachloroethene 14 U 14 2.0 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 Methyl Butyl Ketone(2-Hexanone) 20 U 20 17 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 1,2-Dibromoethane 15 U 15 5.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 Chlorobenzene 9.2 U 9.2 1.8 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 Ethylbenzene 8.7 U 8.7 3.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 m,p-Xylene 22 U 22 3.0 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 Xylene,o- 8.7 U 8.7 3.1 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 Styrene 8.5 U 8.5 3.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 Bromoform 21 U 21 8.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 14 U 14 5.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 4-Ethyltoluene 9.8 U 9.8 3.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 9.8 U 9.8 2.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 9.8 U 9.8 3.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 12 U 12 4.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 12 U 12 3.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 Benzyl chloride 10 U 10 6.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 12 U 12 4.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 37 U 37 18 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 Hexachlorobutadiene 21 U 21 8.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 Naphthalene 26 U 26 16 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 Dibromochloromethane 17 U 17 6.0 ug/m3 03/07/19 09:23 10 Tentatively Identified Compound Est.Result Qualifier Unit D RT CAS No. Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Butane,2-methyl- 32 J N ppb v/v 4.71 78-78-4 03/07/19 09:23 10 Pentane 42 J N ppb v/v 5.27 109-66-0 03/07/19 09:23 10 Pentane, 2-methyl- 13 J N ppb v/v 7.16 107-83-5 03/07/19 09:23 10 Method: EPA 3C - Fixed Gases from Stationary Sources Analyte Result Qualifier RL RL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Methane 30 0.063 0.063 %v/v 03/06/19 01:51 1.57 TestAmerica Burlington Page 20 of 407 3/7/2019 Client Sample Results . y Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47602-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 200-47602-1 Client Sample ID: SV-10 Lab Sample ID: 200-47602-9 Date Collected: 02/27/19 14:27 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 10:33 Sample Container: Summa Canister 1L Method: TO-15 -Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air `$ Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac `5' 5 kp Propylene 86 U 86 55 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 6 Dichlorodifluoromethane 130 25 9.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 1,2-Dichiorotetrafluoroethane 180 14 4.8 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 Chloromethane 10 U 10 5.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 Vinyl chloride 5.1 U 5.1 1.0 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 1,3-Butadiene 4.4 U 4.4 1.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 Bromomethane 7.8 U 7.8 2.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 Chloroethane 13 U 13 5.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 Trichlorofluoromethane 64 11 3.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 Ethanol 37 J 94 23 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 Freon TF 15 U 15 2.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 1,1-Dichloroethene 7.9 U 7.9 1.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 Acetone 120 U 120 62 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 Isopropyl alcohol 120 U 120 44 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 Carbon disulfide 16 U 16 3.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 ,. Methylene Chloride 17 U 17 6.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 -'!• Methyl tert-butyl ether 7.2 U 7.2 2.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 '' trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 7.9 U 7.9 2.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 n-Hexane 6.3 J 7.0 5.6 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 1,1-Dichloroethane 8.1 U 8.1 1.1 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 Vinyl acetate 180 U 180 81 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 Ethyl acetate 180 U 180 40 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 Methyl Ethyl Ketone 15 U 15 5.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 7.9 U 7.9 1.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 Chloroform 9.8 U 9.8 2.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 Tetrahydrofuran 150 U 150 77 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 11 U 11 3.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 Cyclohexane 6.9 U 6.9 2.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 Carbon tetrachloride 13 U 13 1.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 Benzene 6.4 U 6.4 2.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 1,2-Dichloroethane 8.1 U 8.1 2.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 n-Heptane 8.2 U 8.2 5.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 Trichloroethene 2.7 J 11 1.6 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 1,2-Dichloropropane 9.2 U 9.2 5.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 Bromodichloromethane 13 U 13 6.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 9.1 U 9.1 4.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 Methyl isobutyl ketone 20 U 20 15 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 Toluene 7.5 U 7.5 2.6 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 9.1 U 9.1 5.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 11 U 11 4.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 Tetrachloroethene 3.8 J 14 2.0 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 Methyl Butyl Ketone(2-Hexanone) 20 U 20 17 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 1,2-Dibromoethane 15 U 15 5.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 Chlorobenzene 9.2 U 9.2 1.8 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 Ethylbenzene 8.7 U 8.7 3.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 m,p-Xylene 22 U 22 3.0 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 Xylene,o- 8.7 U 8.7 3.1 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 Styrene 8.5 U 8.5 3.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 TestAmerica Burlington Page 21 of 407 3/7/2019 Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47602-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 200-47602-1 Client Sample ID: SV-10 Lab Sample ID: 200-47602-9 Date Collected: 02/27/19 14:27 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 10:33 Sample Container: Summa Canister 1L Method: TO-15 -Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air(Continued) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Bromoform 21 U 21 8.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 6 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 14 U 14 5.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 4-Ethyltoluene 9.8 U 9.8 3.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 9.8 U 9.8 2.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 9.8 U 9.8 3.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 12 U 12 4.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 12 U 12 3.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 Benzyl chloride 10 U 10 6.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 12 U 12 4.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 37 U 37 18 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 Hexachlorobutadiene 21 U 21 8.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 Naphthalene 26 U 26 16 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 Dibromochloromethane 17 U 17 6.0 ug/m3 03/07/19 10:17 10 Tentatively Identified Compound Est.Result Qualifier Unit D RT CAS No. Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Tentatively Identified Compound None ppb v/v 03/07/19 10:1710 Method: EPA 3C - Fixed Gases from Stationary Sources Analyte Result Qualifier RL RL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Methane 0.058 U 0.058 0.058 %v/v 03/06/19 02:39 1.46 Client Sample ID: SV-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-47602-10 Date Collected: 02/27/19 14:54 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 10:33 Sample Container: Summa Canister 1L Method: TO-15 -Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Propylene 86 U 86 55 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 Dichlorodifluoromethane 110 25 9.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 330 14 4.8 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 Chloromethane 10 U 10 5.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 Vinyl chloride 5.1 U 5.1 1.0 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 1,3-Butadiene 1.9 J 4.4 1.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 Bromomethane 7.8 U 7.8 2.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 Chloroethane 13 U 13 5.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 Trichlorofluoromethane 10 J 11 3.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 Ethanol 32 J 94 23 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 Freon TF 15 U 15 2.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 1,1-Dichloroethene 7.9 U 7.9 1.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 Acetone 120 U 120 62 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 Isopropyl alcohol 120 U 120 44 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 Carbon disulfide 16 U 16 3.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 Methylene Chloride 17 U 17 6.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 Methyl tert-butyl ether 7.2 U 7.2 2.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 7.9 U 7.9 2.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 n-Hexane 26 7.0 5.6 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 1,1-Dichloroethane 8.1 U 8.1 1.1 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 Vinyl acetate 180 U 180 81 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 TestAmerica Burlington Page 22 of 407 3/7/2019 Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47602-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 200-47602-1 ;Tient Sample ID: SV-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-47602-10 Date Collected: 02/27/19 14:54 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 10:33 Sample Container: Summa Canister 1L Method: TO-15 -Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air (Continued) ;R Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac ` Ethyl acetate 180 U 180 40 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 6 Methyl Ethyl Ketone 15 U 15 5.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 7.9 U 7.9 1.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 Chloroform 9.8 U 9.8 2.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 Tetrahydrofuran 150 U 150 77 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 11 U 11 3.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 Cyclohexane 7.0 6.9 2.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 Carbon tetrachloride 13 U 13 1.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 Benzene 4.7 J 6.4 2.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 1,2-Dichloroethane 8.1 U 8.1 2.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 n-Heptane 7.9 J 8.2 5.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 Trichloroethene 11 U 11 1.6 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 1,2-Dichloropropane 9.2 U 9.2 5.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 Bromodichloromethane 13 U 13 6.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 9.1 U 9.1 4.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 Methyl isobutyl ketone 20 U 20 15 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 i.,:!,,,'! Toluene 2.7 J 7.5 2.6 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 9.1 U 9.1 5.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 11 U 11 4.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 Tetrachloroethene 14 U 14 2.0 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 Methyl Butyl Ketone(2-Hexanone) 20 U 20 17 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 1,2-Dibromoethane 15 U 15 5.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 Chlorobenzene 9.2 U 9.2 1.8 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 Ethylbenzene 8.7 U 8.7 3.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 m,p-Xylene 22 U 22 3.0 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 Xylene,o- 8.7 U 8.7 3.1 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 Styrene 8.5 U 8.5 3.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 Bromoform 21 U 21 8.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 14 U 14 5.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 4-Ethyltoluene 9.8 U 9.8 3.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 9.8 U 9.8 2.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 9.8 U 9.8 3.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 12 U 12 4.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 12 U 12 3.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 Benzyl chloride 10 U 10 6.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 12 U 12 4.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 37 U 37 18 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 Hexachlorobutadiene 21 U 21 8.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 Naphthalene 26 U 26 16 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 Dibromochloromethane 17 U 17 6.0 ug/m3 03/07/19 11:10 10 Tentatively Identified Compound Est.Result Qualifier Unit D RT CAS No. Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Tentatively Identified Compound None ppb v/v 03/07/19 11:10 10 Method: EPA 3C - Fixed Gases from Stationary Sources Analyte Result Qualifier RL RL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Methane 1.6 0.062 0.062 %v/v 03/06/19 03:27 1.54 TestAmerica Burlington Page 23 of 407 3/7/2019 Client Sample Results 'i Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47602-1 `" Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 200-47602-1 Client Sample ID: SV-12 Lab Sample ID: 200-47602-11 Date Collected: 02/27/19 15:16 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 10:33 Sample Container: Summa Canister 1L Method: TO-15 -Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Propylene 86 U 86 55 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:04 10 6 Dichlorodifluoromethane 180 25 9.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:04 10 1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 380 14 4.8 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:04 10 Chloromethane 10 U 10 5.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:04 10 Vinyl chloride 55 5.1 1.0 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:04 10 1,3-Butadiene 4.4 U 4.4 1.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:04 10 Bromomethane 7.8 U 7.8 2.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:04 10 Chloroethane 24 13 5.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:04 10 Trichlorofluoromethane 11 U 11 3.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:04 10 Ethanol 49 J 94 23 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:04 10 Freon TF 15 U 15 2.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:04 10 1,1-Dichloroethene 2.4 J 7.9 1.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:04 10 Acetone 120 U 120 62 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:04 10 Isopropyl alcohol 120 U 120 44 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:04 10 Carbon disulfide 16 U 16 3.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:04 10 Methylene Chloride 17 U 17 6.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:04 10 Methyl tert-butyl ether 7.2 U 7.2 2.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:04 10 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 3.0 J 7.9 2.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:04 10 n-Hexane 170 7.0 5.6 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:04 10 1,1-Dichloroethane 60 8.1 1.1 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:04 10 Vinyl acetate 180 U 180 81 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:04 10 Ethyl acetate 180 U 180 40 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:04 10 Methyl Ethyl Ketone 15 U 15 5.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:04 10 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 28 7.9 1.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:04 10 Chloroform 9.8 U 9.8 2.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:04 10 Tetrahydrofuran 150 U 150 77 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:04 10 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 4.7 J 11 3.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:04 10 Cyclohexane 47 6.9 2.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:04 10 Carbon tetrachloride 13 U 13 1.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:04 10 Benzene 42 6.4 2.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:04 10 1,2-Dichloroethane 12 8.1 2.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:04 10 n-Heptane 36 8.2 5.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:04 10 Trichloroethene 13 11 1.6 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:04 10 1,2-Dichloropropane 9.2 U 9.2 5.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:04 10 Bromodichloromethane 13 U 13 6.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:04 10 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 9.1 U 9.1 4.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:04 10 Methyl isobutyl ketone 20 U 20 15 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:04 10 Toluene 8.8 7.5 2.6 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:04 10 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 9.1 U 9.1 5.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:04 10 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 11 U 11 4.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:04 10 Tetrachloroethene 14 U 14 2.0 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:04 10 Methyl Butyl Ketone(2-Hexanone) 20 U 20 17 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:04 10 1,2-Dibromoethane 15 U 15 5.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:04 10 Chlorobenzene 9.2 U 9.2 1.8 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:04 10 Ethylbenzene 8.7 U 8.7 3.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:04 10 m,p-Xylene 22 U 22 3.0 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:04 10 Xylene,o- 8.7 U 8.7 3.1 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:04 10 Styrene 8.5 U 8.5 3.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:04 10 TestAmerica Burlington Page 24 of 407 3/7/2019 Client Sample Results Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47602-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 200-47602-1 :tient Sample ID: SV-12 Lab Sample ID: 200-47602-11 Date Collected: 02/27/19 15:16 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 10:33 Sample Container: Summa Canister 1L Method: TO-15 -Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air(Continued) i .rv, Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac ` Bromoform 21 U 21 8.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:04 10 6 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 14 U 14 5.2 ug/m3 03/07/1912:04 10 4-Ethyltoluene 9.8 U 9.8 3.4 ug/m3 03/07/1912:04 10 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 9.8 U 9.8 2.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:04 10 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 9.8 U 9.8 3.9 ug/m3 03/07/1912:04 10 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 12 U 12 4.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:04 10 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 12 U 12 3.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:04 10 Benzyl chloride 10 U 10 6.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:04 10 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 12 U 12 4.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:04 10 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 37 U 37 18 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:04 10 Hexachlorobutadiene 21 U 21 8.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:04 10 Naphthalene 26 U 26 16 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:04 10 Dibromochloromethane 17 U 17 6.0 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:04 10 Tentatively Identified Compound Est.Result Qualifier Unit D RT CAS No. Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Difluorochloromethane 27 J N ppb v/v 3.07 75-45-6 03/07/19 12:04 10 r 1-Butene 16 J N ppb v/v 3.79 106-98-9 03/07/19 12:04 10 #a Butane,2-methyl- 67 J N ppb v/v 4.71 78-78-4 03/07/19 12:04 10 Pentane 110 J N ppb v/v 5.27 109-66-0 03/07/19 12:04 10 Cyclopropane, 1,2-dimethyl-, cis- 15 J N ppb v/v 5.34 930-18-7 03/07/19 12:04 10 2-Butene,2-methyl- 11 J N ppb v/v 5.94 513-35-9 03/07/19 12:04 10 Pentane, 2-methyl- 24 J N ppb v/v 7.16 107-83-5 03/07/19 12:04 10 Pentane,3-methyl- 32 J N ppb v/v 7.64 96-14-0 03/07/19 12:04 10 1-Pentene,2,4,4-trimethyl- 81 J N ppb v/v 12.39 107-39-1 03/07/19 12:04 10 Method: EPA 3C - Fixed Gases from Stationary Sources Analyte Result Qualifier RL RL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Methane 11 0.061 0.061 %v/v 03/06/19 04:15 1.52 Client Sample ID: SV-13 Lab Sample ID: 200-47602-12 Date Collected: 02/27/19 15:44 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 10:33 Sample Container: Summa Canister 1L Method: TO-15 -Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Propylene 220 86 55 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 Dichlorodifluoromethane 32 25 9.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 1,2-Dichlorotetrafiuoroethane 80 14 4.8 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 Chloromethane 10 U 10 5.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 Vinyl chloride 5.1 U 5.1 1.0 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 1,3-Butadiene 18 4.4 1.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 Bromomethane 7.8 U 7.8 2.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 Chloroethane 13 U 13 5.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 Trichlorofluoromethane 11 U 11 3.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 Ethanol 30 J 94 23 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 Freon TF 15 U 15 2.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 1,1-Dichloroethene 7.9 U 7.9 1.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 Acetone 93 J 120 62 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 TestAmerica Burlington Page 25 of 407 3/7/2019 Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47602-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 200-47602-1 Client Sample ID: SV-13 Lab Sample ID: 200-47602-12 Date Collected: 02/27/19 15:44 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 10:33 Sample Container: Summa Canister 1L Method: TO-15 -Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air(Continued) ., Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Isopropyl alcohol 120 U 120 44 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 6 Carbon disulfide 6.6 J 16 3.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 Methylene Chloride 17 U 17 6.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 Methyl tert-butyl ether 7.2 U 7.2 2.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 7.9 U 7.9 2.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 n-Hexane 7.3 7.0 5.6 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 1,1-Dichloroethane 8.1 U 8.1 1.1 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 Vinyl acetate 180 U 180 81 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 Ethyl acetate 180 U 180 40 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 Methyl Ethyl Ketone 10 J 15 5.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 7.9 U 7.9 1.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 Chloroform 9.8 U 9.8 2.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 Tetrahydrofuran 150 U 150 77 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 11 U 11 3.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 Cyclohexane 6.9 U 6.9 2.2 ug/m3 03/07/1912:57 10 Carbon tetrachloride 13 U 13 1.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 Benzene 4.9 J 6.4 2.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 1,2-Dichloroethane 8.1 U 8.1 2.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 n-Heptane 8.2 U 8.2 5.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 Trichloroethene 11 U 11 1.6 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 1,2-Dichloropropane 9.2 U 9.2 5.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 Bromodichloromethane 13 U 13 6.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 9.1 U 9.1 4.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 Methyl isobutyl ketone 20 U 20 15 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 Toluene 7.5 U 7.5 2.6 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 9.1 U 9.1 5.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 11 U 11 4.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 Tetrachloroethene 14 U 14 2.0 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 Methyl Butyl Ketone(2-Hexanone) 20 U 20 17 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 1,2-Dibromoethane 15 U 15 5.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 Chlorobenzene 9.2 U 9.2 1.8 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 Ethylbenzene 8.7 U 8.7 3.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 m,p-Xylene 22 U 22 3.0 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 Xylene,o- 8.7 U 8.7 3.1 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 Styrene 8.5 U 8.5 3.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 Bromoform 21 U 21 8.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 14 U 14 5.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 4-Ethyltoluene 9.8 U 9.8 3.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 9.8 U 9.8 2.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 9.8 U 9.8 3.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 12 U 12 4.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 12 U 12 3.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 Benzyl chloride 10 U 10 6.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 12 U 12 4.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 37 U 37 18 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 Hexachlorobutadiene 21 U 21 8.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 Naphthalene 26 U 26 16 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 Dibromochloromethane 17 U 17 6.0 ug/m3 03/07/19 12:57 10 TestAmerica Burlington Page 26 of 407 3/7/2019 Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47602-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 200-47602-1 :tient Sample ID: SV-13 Lab Sample IDI 200-47602-12 Date Collected: 02/27/19 15:44 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 10:33 Sample Container: Summa Canister 1L 11 Tentatively Identified Compound Est.Result Qualifier Unit D RT CAS No. Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac I= Tentatively Identified Compound None ppb v/v 03/07/19 12:57 10 c Method: EPA 3C - Fixed Gases from Stationary Sources 6 Analyte Result Qualifier RL RL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Methane 0.22 0.064 0.064 %v/v 03/06/19 05:03 1.59 Client Sample ID: SV-14 Lab Sample ID: 200-47602-13 Date Collected: 02/27/19 16:10 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 10:33 Sample Container: Summa Canister 1L Method: TO-15 -Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Propylene 91 86 55 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 Dichlorodifluoromethane 25 U 25 9.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 14 U 14 4.8 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 Chloromethane 10 U 10 5.2 ug/m3 03/07/1913:50 10 , .r Vinyl chloride 5.1 U 5.1 1.0 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 1,3-Butadiene 10 4.4 1.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 Bromomethane 7.8 U 7.8 2.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 Chloroethane 13 U 13 5.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 Trichlorofluoromethane 11 U 11 3.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 Ethanol 33 J 94 23 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 Freon TF 15 U 15 2.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 1,1-Dichloroethene 7.9 U 7.9 1.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 Acetone 270 120 62 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 Isopropyl alcohol 120 U 120 44 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 Carbon disulfide 16 U 16 3.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 Methylene Chloride 17 U 17 6.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 Methyl tert-butyl ether 7.2 U 7.2 2.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 7.9 U 7.9 2.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 n-Hexane 7.0 U 7.0 5.6 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 1,1-Dichloroethane 8.1 U 8.1 1.1 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 Vinyl acetate 180 U 180 81 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 Ethyl acetate 180 U 180 40 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 Methyl Ethyl Ketone 26 15 5.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 7.9 U 7.9 1.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 Chloroform 9.8 U 9.8 2.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 Tetrahydrofuran 150 U 150 77 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 11 U 11 3.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 Cyclohexane 6.9 U 6.9 2.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 Carbon tetrachloride 13 U 13 1.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 Benzene 3.8 J 6.4 2.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 1,2-Dichloroethane 8.1 U 8.1 2.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 n-Heptane 8.2 U 8.2 5.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 Trichloroethene 11 U 11 1.6 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 1,2-Dichloropropane 9.2 U 9.2 5.5 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 Bromodichloromethane 13 U 13 6.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 9.1 U 9.1 4.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 TestAmerica Burlington Page 27 of 407 3/7/2019 Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47602-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 200-47602-1 Client Sample ID: SV-14 Lab Sample ID: 200-47602-13 Date Collected: 02/27/19 16:10 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 10:33 Sample Container: Summa Canister IL Method: TO-15 -Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air(Continued) = ' Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Methyl isobutyl ketone 20 U 20 15 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 6 Toluene 7.5 U 7.5 2.6 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 9.1 U 9.1 5.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 11 U 11 4.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 Tetrachloroethene 14 U 14 2.0 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 Methyl Butyl Ketone(2-Hexanone) 20 U 20 17 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 1,2-Dibromoethane 15 U 15 5.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 Chlorobenzene 9.2 U 9.2 1.8 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 Ethylbenzene 8.7 U 8.7 3.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 m,p-Xylene 22 U 22 3.0 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 Xylene,o- 8.7 U 8.7 3.1 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 Styrene 8.5 U 8.5 3.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 Bromoform 21 U 21 8.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 14 U 14 5.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 4-Ethyltoluene 9.8 U 9.8 3.4 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 9.8 U 9.8 2.9 ug/m3 03/07/1913:50 10 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 9.8 U 9.8 3.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 12 U 12 4.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 12 U 12 3.9 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 Benzyl chloride 10 U 10 6.2 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 12 U 12 4.3 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 37 U 37 18 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 Hexachlorobutadiene 21 U 21 8.7 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 Naphthalene 26 U 26 16 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 Dibromochloromethane 17 U 17 6.0 ug/m3 03/07/19 13:50 10 Tentatively Identified Compound Est.Result Qualifier Unit D RT CAS No. Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Tentatively Identified Compound None ppb v/v 03/07/19 13:50 10 Method: EPA 3C - Fixed Gases from Stationary Sources Analyte Result Qualifier RL RL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Methane 0.062 U 0.062 0.062 %v/v 03/06/19 05:51 1.54 TestAmerica Burlington Page 28 of 407 3/7/2019 QC Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47602-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 200-47602-1 Jlethod: TO-15 -Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air Lab Sample ID: MB 200-140558/3 Client Sample ID: Method Blank Matrix: Air Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 140558 MB MB Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Propylene 8.6 U 8.6 5.5 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane 2.5 U 2.5 0.99 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 1.4 U 1.4 0.48 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 Chloromethane 1.0 U 1.0 0.52 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 Vinyl chloride 0.51 U 0.51 0.10 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 1,3-Butadiene 0.44 U 0.44 0.14 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 Bromomethane 0.78 U 0.78 0.24 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 Chloroethane 1.3 U 1.3 0.55 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 Trichlorofluoromethane 1.1 U 1.1 0.35 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 Ethanol 9.4 U 9.4 2.3 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 Freon TF 1.5 U 1.5 0.24 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 1,1-Dichloroethene 0.79 U 0.79 0.13 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 Acetone 12 U 12 6.2 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 Isopropyl alcohol 12 U 12 4.4 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 Carbon disulfide 1.6 U 1.6 0.37 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 Methylene Chloride 1.7 U 1.7 0.69 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 Methyl tert-butyl ether 0.72 U 0.72 0.22 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.79 U 0.79 0.29 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 n-Hexane 0.70 U 0.70 0.56 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 1,1-Dichloroethane 0.81 U 0.81 0.11 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 Vinyl acetate 18 U 18 8.1 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 Ethyl acetate 18 U 18 4.0 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 Methyl Ethyl Ketone 1.5 U 1.5 0.59 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.79 U 0.79 0.15 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 Chloroform 0.98 U 0.98 0.25 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 Tetrahydrofuran 15 U 15 7.7 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1.1 U 1.1 0.37 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 Cyclohexane 0.69 U 0.69 0.22 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 Carbon tetrachloride 1.3 U 1.3 0.15 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 Benzene 0.64 U 0.64 0.23 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.81 U 0.81 0.25 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 n-Heptane 0.82 U 0.82 0.57 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 Trichloroethene 1.1 U 1.1 0.16 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.92 U 0.92 0.55 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 Bromodichloromethane 1.3 U 1.3 0.63 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.91 U 0.91 0.44 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 Methyl isobutyl ketone 2.0 U 2.0 1.5 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 Toluene 0.75 U 0.75 0.26 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.91 U 0.91 0.54 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1.1 U 1.1 0.43 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 Tetrachloroethene 1.4 U 1.4 0.20 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 Methyl Butyl Ketone(2-Hexanone) 2.0 U 2.0 1.7 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 1,2-Dibromoethane 1.5 U 1.5 0.53 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 Chlorobenzene 0.92 U 0.92 0.18 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 Ethylbenzene 0.87 U 0.87 0.32 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 m,p-Xylene 2.2 U 2.2 0.30 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 Xylene,o- 0.87 U 0.87 0.31 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 Styrene 0.85 U 0.85 0.37 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 TestAmerica Burlington Page 29 of 407 3/7/2019 QC Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47602-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 200-47602-1 Method: TO-15 -Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air(Continued) Lab Sample ID: MB 200-140558/3 Client Sample ID: Method Blank Matrix: Air Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 140558 MB MB a Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Bromoform 2.1 U 2.1 0.89 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1.4 U 1.4 0.52 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 4-Ethyltoluene 0.98 U 0.98 0.34 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 gi 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.98 U 0.98 0.29 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.98 U 0.98 0.39 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1.2 U 1.2 0.49 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 1.2 U 1.2 0.39 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 Benzyl chloride 1.0 U 1.0 0.62 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 1.2 U 1.2 0.43 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 3.7 U 3.7 1.8 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 Hexachlorobutadiene 2.1 U 2.1 0.87 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 Naphthalene 2.6 U 2.6 1.6 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 Dibromochloromethane 1.7 U 1.7 0.60 ug/m3 03/06/19 17:26 1 MB MB Tentatively Identified Compound Est.Result Qualifier Unit D RT CAS No. Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Tentatively Identified Compound None ppb v/v 03/06/19 17:26 1 Lab Sample ID: LCS 200-140558/4 Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix: Air Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 140558 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Propylene 17.2 16.9 ug/m3 98 58-129 Dichlorodifluoromethane 49.4 48.4 ug/m3 98 68-128 1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 69.9 69.8 ug/m3 100 78-138 Chloromethane 20.6 21.5 ug/m3 104 57.126 Vinyl chloride 25.6 26.8 ug/m3 105 62-125 1,3-Butadiene 22.1 23.1 ug/m3 104 59-125 Bromomethane 38.8 35.3 ug/m3 91 68-128 Chloroethane 26.4 22.3 ug/m3 84 65-125 Trichlorofluoromethane 56.2 57.7 ug/m3 103 67-127 Ethanol 28.3 30.5 ug/m3 108 28-168 Freon TF 76.6 76.7 ug/m3 100 68-128 1,1-Dichloroethene 39.6 37.7 ug/m3 95 67-127 Acetone 23.7 25.5 ug/m3 107 64-136 Isopropyl alcohol 24.6 27.5 ug/m3 112 55-124 Carbon disulfide 31.1 33.1 ug/m3 106 81_141 Methylene Chloride 34.7 38.2 ug/m3 110 62-122 Methyl tert-butyl ether 36.0 37.5 ug/m3 104 67.127 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 39.6 42.2 ug/m3 106 72-132 n-Hexane 35.2 38.1 ug/m3 108 71-131 1,1-Dichloroethane 40.5 40.9 ug/m3 101 66-126 Vinyl acetate 35.2 39.2 ug/m3 111 62-130 Ethyl acetate 36.0 38.7 ug/m3 107 75-135 Methyl Ethyl Ketone 29.5 31.3 ug/m3 106 62-122 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 39.6 37.5 ug/m3 95 67-127 Chloroform 48.8 49.4 ug/m3 101 69-129 Tetrahydrofuran 29.5 34.2 ug/m3 116 61-136 TestAmerica Burlington Page 30 of 407 3/7/2019 QC Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47602-1 ry" Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 200-47602-1 Method: TO-15 -Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air(Continued) Lab Sample ID: LCS 200-140558/4 Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix: Air Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 140558 "ir:4 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. ? Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 54.6 55.3 ug/m3 101 70-130 Cyclohexane 34.4 35.8 ug/m3 104 69-129 Carbon tetrachloride 62.9 63.7 ug/m3 101 62.143El Benzene 31.9 32.9 ug/m3 103 67-127 1,2-Dichloroethane 40.5 41.7 ug/m3 103 67-132 n-Heptane 41.0 45.0 ug/m3 110 62.130 Trichloroethene 53.7 51.0 ug/m3 95 68-128 1,2-Dichloropropane 46.2 46.6 ug/m3 101 67-127 Bromodichloromethane 67.0 67.2 ug/m3 100 69-129 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 45.4 45.4 ug/m3 100 70-130 Methyl isobutyl ketone 41.0 45.1 ug/m3 110 62-130 Toluene 37.7 36.4 ug/m3 96 67-127 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 45.4 46.3 ug/m3 102 69-129 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 54.6 55.2 ug/m3 101 69-129 Tetrachloroethene 67.8 61.8 ug/m3 91 70-130 Methyl Butyl Ketone 41.0 44.9 ug/m3 109 61-127 (2-Hexanone) 1,2-Dibromoethane 76.8 76.1 ug/m3 99 70-130 Chlorobenzene 46.0 44.3 ug/m3 96 68-128 Ethylbenzene 43.4 43.3 ug/m3 100 68-128 m,p-Xylene 86.8 85.3 ug/m3 98 68-128 Xylene,o- 43.4 42.7 ug/m3 98 67-127 Styrene 42.6 44.1 ug/m3 103 68-128 Bromoform 103 99.7 ug/m3 96 34-170 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 68.6 67.6 ug/m3 98 69-129 4-Ethyltoluene 49.2 49.2 ug/m3 100 69.129 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 49.2 48.9 ug/m3 99 65-125 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 49.2 48.7 ug/m3 99 65-125 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 60.1 57.6 ug/m3 96 67-127 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 60.1 57.0 ug/m3 95 66-126 Benzyl chloride 51.8 53.6 ug/m3 104 54-135 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 60.1 56.1 ug/m3 93 67-127 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 74.2 73.3 ug/m3 99 59-126 Hexachlorobutadiene 107 102 ug/m3 96 62-130 Naphthalene 52.4 52.5 ug/m3 100 50-121 Dibromochloromethane 85.2 84.6 ug/m3 99 66-130 Lab Sample ID: 200-47602-1 DU Client Sample ID: SV-1 Matrix: Air Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 140558 Sample Sample DU DU RPD Analyte Result Qualifier Result Qualifier Unit D RPD Limit Propylene 86 U 86 U ug/m3 NC 25 Dichlorodifluoromethane 12 J 11.7 J ug/m3 5 25 1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 14 U 14 U ug/m3 NC 25 Chloromethane 10 U 10 U ug/m3 NC 25 Vinyl chloride 5.1 U 5.1 U ug/m3 NC 25 1,3-Butadiene 3.9 J 3.50 J ug/m3 11 25 Bromomethane 7.8 U 7.8 U ug/m3 NC 25 TestAmerica Burlington Page 31 of 407 3/7/2019 QC Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47602-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 200-47602-1 Method: TO-15 -Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air (Continued) Lab Sample ID: 200-47602-1 DU Client Sample ID: SV-1 Matrix: Air Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 140558 Sample Sample DU DU RPD Analyte Result Qualifier Result Qualifier Unit D RPD Limit Chloroethane 13 U 13 U ug/m3 NC 25 Trichlorofluoromethane 11 U 11 U ug/m3 NC 25 Eil Ethanol 71 J 59.8 J ug/m3 17 25 Freon TF 15 U 15 U ug/m3 NC 25 1,1-Dichloroethene 7.9 U 7.9 U ug/m3 NC 25 Acetone 120 U 120 U ug/m3 NC 25 Isopropyl alcohol 61 J 56.2 J ug/m3 8 25 Carbon disulfide 16 U 16 U ug/m3 NC 25 Methylene Chloride 17 U 17 U ug/m3 NC 25 Methyl tert-butyl ether 7.2 U 7.2 U ug/m3 NC 25 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 7.9 U 7.9 U ug/m3 NC 25 n-Hexane 7.0 U 7.0 U ug/m3 NC 25 1,1-Dichloroethane 8.1 U 8.1 U ug/m3 NC 25 Vinyl acetate 180 U 180 U ug/m3 NC 25 Ethyl acetate 180 U 180 U ug/m3 NC 25 k Methyl Ethyl Ketone 15 U 15 U ug/m3 NC 25 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 7.9 U 7.9 U ug/m3 NC 25 Chloroform 9.8 U 9.8 U ug/m3 NC 25 Tetrahydrofuran 150 U 150 U ug/m3 NC 25 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 11 U 11 U ug/m3 NC 25 Cyclohexane 6.9 U 6.9 U ug/m3 NC 25 Carbon tetrachloride 13 U 13 U ug/m3 NC 25 Benzene 6.4 U 6.4 U ug/m3 NC 25 1,2-Dichloroethane 8.1 U 8.1 U ug/m3 NC 25 n-Heptane 8.2 U 8.2 U ug/m3 NC 25 Trichloroethene 11 U 11 U ug/m3 NC 25 1,2-Dichloropropane 9.2 U 9.2 U ug/m3 NC 25 Bromodichloromethane 13 U 13 U ug/m3 NC 25 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 9.1 U 9.1 U ug/m3 NC 25 Methyl isobutyl ketone 20 U 20 U ug/m3 NC 25 Toluene 7.5 U 7.5 U ug/m3 NC 25 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 9.1 U 9.1 U ug/m3 NC 25 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 11 U 11 U ug/m3 NC 25 Tetrachloroethene 14 U 14 U ug/m3 NC 25 Methyl Butyl Ketone 20 U 20 U ug/m3 NC 25 (2-Hexanone) 1,2-Dibromoethane 15 U 15 U ug/m3 NC 25 Chlorobenzene 9.2 U 9.2 U ug/m3 NC 25 Ethylbenzene 8.7 U 8.7 U ug/m3 NC 25 m,p-Xylene 22 U 22 U ug/m3 NC 25 Xylene,o- 8.7 U 8.7 U ug/m3 NC 25 Styrene 8.5 U 8.5 U ug/m3 NC 25 Bromoform 21 U 21 U ug/m3 NC 25 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 14 U 14 U ug/m3 NC 25 4-Ethyltoluene 9.8 U 9.8 U ug/m3 NC 25 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 9.8 U 9.8 U ug/m3 NC 25 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 9.8 U 9.8 U ug/m3 NC 25 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 12 U 12 U ug/m3 NC 25 TestAmerica Burlington Page 32 of 407 3/7/2019 QC Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47602-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 200-47602-1 Vlethod: TO-15 - Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air (Continued) Lab Sample ID: 200-47602-1 DU Client Sample ID: SV-1 Matrix: Air Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 140558 Sample Sample DU DU RPD Analyte Result Qualifier Result Qualifier Unit D RPD Limit 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 12 U 12 U ug/m3 NC 25 Benzyl chloride 10 U 10 U ug/m3 NC 25 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 12 U 12 U ug/m3 NC 25 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 37 U 37 U ug/m3 NC 25 Hexachlorobutadiene 21 U 21 U ug/m3 NC 25 Naphthalene 26 U 26 U ug/m3 NC 25 Dibromochloromethane 17 U 17 U ug/m3 NC 25 Method: EPA 3C - Fixed Gases from Stationary Sources (Lab Sample ID: MB 200-140611/3 Client Sample ID: Method Blank Matrix: Air Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 140611 MB MB Analyte Result Qualifier RL RL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Methane 0.040 U 0.040 0.040 %v/v 03/05/19 15:51 1 L 1 Lab Sample ID: LCS 200-140611/2 Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix: Air Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 140611 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Methane 4.00 4.00 %v/v 100 70_130 TestAmerica Burlington Page 33 of 407 3/7/2019 QC Association Summary Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47602-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 200-47602-1 Air - GC/MS VOA Analysis Batch: 140558 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 4, 200-47602-1 SV-1 Total/NA Air TO-15 200-47602-2 SV-2 Total/NA Air TO-15 200-47602-3 SV-4 Total/NA Air TO-15 200-47602-4 SV-5 Total/NA Air TO-15 200-47602-5 SV-6 Total/NA Air TO-15 200-47602-6 SV-7 Total/NA Air TO-15 200-47602-7 SV-8 Total/NA Air TO-15 Q 200-47602-8 SV-9 Total/NA Air TO-15 v 200-47602-9 SV-10 Total/NA Air TO-15 200-47602-10 SV-11 Total/NA Air TO-15 200-47602-11 SV-12 Total/NA Air TO-15 200-47602-12 SV-13 Total/NA Air TO-15 200-47602-13 SV-14 Total/NA Air TO-15 MB 200-140558/3 Method Blank Total/NA Air TO-15 LCS 200-140558/4 Lab Control Sample Total/NA Air TO-15 200-47602-1 DU SV-1 Total/NA Air TO-15 Air - GC VOA Analysis Batch: 140611 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 200-47602-1 SV-1 Total/NA Air EPA 3C 200-47602-2 SV-2 Total/NA Air EPA 3C 200-47602-3 SV-4 Total/NA Air EPA 3C 200-47602-4 SV-5 Total/NA Air EPA 3C 200-47602-5 SV-6 Total/NA Air EPA 3C 200-47602-6 SV-7 Total/NA Air EPA 3C 200-47602-7 SV-8 Total/NA Air EPA 3C 200-47602-8 SV-9 Total/NA Air EPA 3C 200-47602-9 SV-10 Total/NA Air EPA 3C 200-47602-10 SV-11 Total/NA Air EPA 3C 200-47602-11 SV-12 Total/NA Air EPA 3C 200-47602-12 SV-13 Total/NA Air EPA 3C 200-47602-13 SV-14 Total/NA Air EPA 3C MB 200-140611/3 Method Blank Total/NA Air EPA 3C LCS 200-140611/2 Lab Control Sample Total/NA Air EPA 3C TestAmerica Burlington Page 34 of 407 3/7/2019 Lab Chronicle :; Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47602-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 200-47602-1 Client Sample ID: SV-1 Lab Sample ID: 200-47602-1 Date Collected: 02/27/19 09:22 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 10:33 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared - r Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis TO-15 10 140558 03/06/19 23:39 K1P TAL BUR Total/NA Analysis EPA 3C 1.36 140611 03/05/19 20:08 WRD TAL BUR Client Sample ID: SV-2 Lab Sample ID: 200-47602-2 ,,, Date Collected: 02/27/19 10:59 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 10:33 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis TO-15 10 140558 03/07/19 01:25 K1P TAL BUR Total/NA Analysis EPA 3C 1.48 140611 03/05/19 20:56 WRD TAL BUR Client Sample ID: SV-4 Lab Sample ID: 200-47602-3 Date Collected: 02/27/19 11:33 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 10:33 ,, A Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis TO-15 10 140558 03/07/19 02:18 K1P TAL BUR Total/NA Analysis EPA 3C 1.41 140611 03/05/19 21:44 WRD TAL BUR Client Sample ID: SV-5 Lab Sample ID: 200-47602-4 Date Collected: 02/27/19 12:13 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 10:33 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis TO-15 10 140558 03/07/19 04:05 K1P TAL BUR Total/NA Analysis EPA 3C 1.37 140611 03/05/19 22:32 WRD TAL BUR Client Sample ID: SV-6 Lab Sample ID: 200-47602-5 Date Collected: 02/27/19 12:40 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 10:33 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis TO-15 10 140558 03/07/19 04:58 K1 P TAL BUR Total/NA Analysis EPA 3C 1.58 140611 03/05/19 23:20 WRD TAL BUR Client Sample ID: SV-7 Lab Sample ID: 200-47602-6 Date Collected: 02/27/19 12:47 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 10:33 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis TO-15 10 140558 03/07/19 07:37 K1P TAL BUR TestAmerica Burlington Page 35 of 407 3/7/2019 Lab Chronicle Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47602-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 200-47602-1 Client Sample ID: SV-7 Lab Sample ID: 200-47602-6 Date Collected: 02/27/19 12:47 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 10:33 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis EPA 3C 1.41 140611 03/06/19 00:09 WRD TAL BUR Client Sample ID: SV-8 Lab Sample ID: 200-47602-7 Date Collected: 02/27/19 13:30 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 10:33 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab 9 Total/NA Analysis TO-15 10 140558 03/07/19 05:51 K1P TAL BUR Total/NA Analysis EPA 3C 1.47 140611 03/06/19 01:00 WRD TAL BUR Client Sample ID: SV-9 Lab Sample ID: 200-47602-8 Date Collected: 02/27/19 14:04 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 10:33 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis TO-15 10 140558 03/07/19 09:23 K1P TAL BUR Total/NA Analysis EPA 3C 1.57 140611 03/06/19 01:51 WRD TAL BUR Client Sample ID: SV-10 Lab Sample ID: 200-47602-9 Date Collected: 02/27/19 14:27 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 10:33 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis TO-15 10 140558 03/07/19 10:17 K1P TAL BUR Total/NA Analysis EPA 3C 1.46 140611 03/06/19 02:39 WRD TAL BUR Client Sample ID: SV-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-47602-10 Date Collected: 02/27/19 14:54 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 10:33 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis TO-15 10 140558 03/07/19 11:10 K1P TAL BUR Total/NA Analysis EPA 3C 1.54 140611 03/06/19 03:27 WRD TAL BUR Client Sample ID: SV-12 Lab Sample ID: 200-47602-11 Date Collected: 02/27/19 15:16 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 10:33 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis TO-15 10 140558 03/07/19 12:04 K1P TAL BUR Total/NA Analysis EPA 3C 1.52 140611 03/06/19 04:15 WRD TAL BUR TestAmerica Burlington Page 36 of 407 3/7/2019 Lab Chronicle Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47602-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 200-47602-1 Client Sample ID: SV-13 Lab Sample ID: 200-47602-12 Date Collected: 02/27/19 15:44 Matrix: Air Date Received: 02/28/19 10:33 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared € Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Z ° ' Total/NA Analysis TO-15 10 140558 03/07/19 12:57 K1P TAL BUR Total/NA Analysis EPA 3C 1.59 140611 03/06/19 05:03 WRD TAL BUR Client Sample ID: SV-14 Lab Sample ID: 200-47602-13 Date Collected: 02/27/19 16:10 Matrix: Air • Date Received: 0.2/28/19 10:33 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis TO-15 10 140558 03/07/19 13:50 K1P TAL BUR Total/NA Analysis EPA 3C 1.54 140611 03/06/19 05:51 WRD TAL BUR Laboratory References: TAL BUR=TestAmerica Burlington,30 Community Drive,Suite 11,South Burlington,VT 05403,TEL(802)660-1990 TestAmerica Burlington Page 37 of 407 3/7/2019 Accreditation/Certification Summary Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47602-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 200-47602-1 Laboratory: TestAmerica Burlington Unless otherwise noted,all analytes for this laboratory were covered under each accreditation/certification below. Authority Program EPA Region Identification Number Expiration Date Minnesota NELAP 5 050-999-436 12-31-19 The following analytes are included in this report,but the laboratory is not certified by the governing authority. This list may include analytes for which the agency does not offer certification. Analysis Method Prep Method Matrix Analyte TO-15 Air Vinyl acetate 10 TestAmerica Burlington Page 38 of 407 3/7/2019 Method Summary Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47602-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 200-47602-1 Method Method Description Protocol Laboratory TO-15 Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air EPA TAL BUR EPA 3C Fixed Gases from Stationary Sources EPA TAL BUR Protocol References: EPA=US Environmental Protection Agency Laboratory References: TAL BUR=TestAmerica Burlington,30 Community Drive,Suite 11,South Burlington,VT 05403,TEL(802)660-1990 TestAmerica Burlington Page 39 of 407 3/7/2019 Sample Summary Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47602-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 200-47602-1 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Matrix Collected Received 200-47602-1 SV-1 Air 02/27/19 09:22 02/28/19 10:33 200-47602-2 SV-2 Air 02/27/19 10:59 02/28/19 10:33 200-47602-3 SV-4 Air 02/27/19 11:33 02/28/19 10:33 200-47602-4 SV-5 Air02/27/19 12:13 02/28/19 10:33 '' 200-47602-5 SV-6 Air 02/27/19 12:40 02/28/19 10:33 200-47602-6 SV-7 Air 02/27/19 12:47 02/28/19 10:33 200-47602-7 SV-8 Air 02/27/19 13:30 02/28/19 10:33 200-47602-8 SV-9 Air 02/27/19 14:04 02/28/19 10:33 200-47602-9 SV-10 Air 02/27/19 14:27 02/28/19 10:33 200-47602-10 SV-11 Air 02/27/19 14:54 02/28/19 10:33 200-47602-11 SV-12 Air 02/27/19 15:16 02/28/19 10:33 200-47602-12 SV-13 Air 02/27/19 15:44 02/28/19 10:33 200-47602-13 SV-14 Air 02/27/19 16:10 02/28/19 10:33 El ''llil TestAmerica Burlington Page 40 of 407 3/7/2019 SV YNKlu 1 Z TestAmerica Burlington 200-47602 Chain of Custody ister Samples Chain of Custody Record TestAmerica 30 Community Drive Suite 11 -.�-,-..00ratories,Inc.assumes no liability with respect to the collection and shipment of these samples. THE LEADER IN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING South Burlington,VT 05403-6809 ' (7 'V`�` r ��Jw phone 802.660.1990 fax 802.660.1919 N�tl�\ ��� 1 (o'rY 430 'I TestAmerica Laboratories,Inc. 1` Client Project Manaager: I 'A` Samps Collected By: Ai\c\"eA-.("- A COC No: Company Name: i3 Phone: t 2_ g00 - 3299 1 of .C— COCs Address: Igo `k6 ' (��eAc.(�1}tC Email: N\ Sc,46, ktyp)t(_1z.,L0`t.n. / M city/state/zip V,p\Q \byt 1'+53 SS3Sq Cv+.,�,cseS��..®(� t_u..e,C),-., y „ For Lab Use Only: Phone: (1(,3 (pi; Z O3 8 Site Contact: C.GT•'i A Walk-in Client: FAX: ) Tel/Fax ij63 44'3 Z_O ° w Lab Sampling: Project Name: \ �!��� ; S ;, (� ��'� "`^�0� Anaylsis Turnaround Time o • y o Site/Location: OrC tm.,.. Standard(Specific): ZC = n ' J ¢ c P 0# �rj[j 03 � � a Rush(Specifiy): ca. . p Job/SDG No.: ', io 8 (See below for Add'I Items) v a Canister Canister y w .o Ii p�',` Q w 0 N Flow m Sample Time Vacuum in Vacuum in Canister 7 a ~ ` '-0 Sample Identification Time Start Controller w U ,o o �l ¢ ro e a - 9-- Date(s) Stop Field,'Hg Field,'Hg ID ID c 'a r+ H S y 'a.: `p 2 t0 j v `w (Start)' (Stop)' O O a a y a L .�,5 'a _ ic- r w Si ¢ w O .a' 5 e, in N 3 o Sample Specific Notes: SV- 1 / # gf ?2z. -z' - ti ( 7i . •z x X ------ SV-Z 1651 tog -30 -1.5 ti6A37 635 X _ - _ _ _ - z _ _ -_ -..-„--4, __ _ - co a SV— I/Z? 1133 —30 —3 (0`/1 3sAX SV S 1 IZ13 —30 -5 (,11(, 58?/ X _ x 510-(0 i 33 1z110 -z9 -z Co 'O5 35q6 Y X )< S V- '7 tV(I WO `30 It-I 53/.5 381? X x , — X S V \323 13 - Z9 -3 'J cPo0 58 95 X x n ._--- 9359 Pia? -29 -3 x983 sy93 n X ._--- sV- 10 14' l izz 19zQ --zio -Z.s Q s9i( X. .. - TemJperature(Fahrenheit) Start Interior (Ambient Stop Pressure(inches of Hg Start Interior Ambient 11 Stop Special Instructions/QC Requirements: omments: V\CLOt Ako fid'io1 '' ory - - Samples Shipped by: Da ! ni Sa eceiv d . • TtyR Js h "ly: - Date Time: Received , Relinquished by: Date/Time: Receivedby: Lab Use Only Shipper Name,, Opened by - Condition; r Form No.CA-C-WI-003,Rev.2.5,dated 9/22/2017 N) O 1 CD SO WK z 44- 2— TestAmerica Burlington Canister Samples Chain of Custody Record TestAmerica 30 Community Drive Suite 11 TestAmerica Laboratories,Inc.assumes no liability with respect to the collection and shipment of these samples. THE LEADER IN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING South Burlington,VT 05403-6809 1 phone 802.660.1990 fax 802.660.1919 (ril'r(A_n t [ r t{�1 Cor y A- 4 .}b ' TestAmerica Laboratories,Inc. Client Contact Infor ti n + 1}� Client Project Manager: �► I VJs Samples Collected By: 1 J 14\� CO No: Company Name: t,` Phone: ( 1z ? ' ' t4( of COCs Address: Email: pS ,e 6, W l� Cori o r � _ City/State/Zip Ml le �1Vv C V.,is y .. For Lab Use Only: Phone: Site Contact: 8 5, a Walk-in Client: FAX: — t Tel/Fax cc w N Lab Sampling: Project Name: (c\�1 'QC � �s Anaylsis Turnaroun Time J y Site/Location: 0L'`t0 1 ,IY\w Standard(Specific): ( v a6i a `o Job/SDG No.: P O# 8 ssoi 000 3 Rush(Specifiy): a N a L (See below for Add'I Items) It, S in of ,a E N Canister Canister co m m u10i l Sample Identification Sample rime Start Time Vacuum in Vacuum In Controller Canister N Flow H v N o 9 .a,: ¢ m .n a t� a Date(s) Stop Field,'Hg Field,'Hg ID ID w n N m s- a •a_ 8 rn, 3 > a d (Start)' (Stop)' a a a a y nQ. £ >.�_.. •°o I- E- u ui a ur O tn:. 5 e N N J 0 Sample Specific Notes: 5 v--i1 al ;119 i 4OPI )V5/ 11! �-3 47 I q 14 cob X , -) __--, X Sv-\Z 150/ 1 sl( --2' -y (95Z(o (r341.0 X X — SU-13 1 538 1.5Y' -Z8 -V (931(p s ' ' X X co IV _ a .A O Temperature(Fahrenheit) Start Interior (Ambient Stop Pressure(inches of Hgj Start Interior Ambient Stop Special Instructions/QC Requireme-- omment i Samples Shipped by' —J JP. A 0 0 PIP"--a to AT:: S �Rec ived by .--- 0_--,77- 1 (i �'�7— I +�� ) X71 t� r 7°v / Sa s lenr1 D e/ Ime: Received b y: a7lr /7lD ..„„,,,07,... -4,,,7' t/J?/11 (ot- 1 �4 I Relinquished by: Dail/Time: Receive y: Lab,UseOnly Shipper Name: Opened by, Condition - , -F. v Form No.CA-C-WI-003,Rev.2.5,dated 9/22/2017 l) 0 CO I „„..,•,11 1'1.= -----; , .1,11, / ORIGIN ID:BTVA (80e.) 922-2777 SHIP DATE: 12FEB19 ACTWGT: 40.00 LB MAN "1421011gIR LABORATORIES, INC. CAD: 000890364/CAFE3210 _75 EST 27TH ST IMI . i UNITED STA ARIThO....SJ...54"k"------.4.......,,.; ; TO SAMPLE MANAGEMENT - TEST AMERICA BURLINGTON: -. 30 COMMUNITY DRIVE SUITE 11r: , - I SOUTH BURLINGTON VT 05403 WA 923-1068 i REF: S200-22697 AMA:El HIM t'',C 1 ” iril .,, ,iliii .0i, . ,_ rr Express 10 ( !ill'il 'ft ei ri iii, 1:1 tii IC 1 L' I yilF.19, i '' '4 il : - -„,...-- RETURNS MON-SAT 1 irofgfi 4838 4987 1288 PRIORITY OVERNIGHT 05403 i,. • VT US 4 , . - t '1,..:1..'' , , , j 1 , . 11: IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII . ... , t i , --- Page 43 of 407 3/7/2019 Login Sample Receipt Checklist Client:Wenck Associates, Inc Job Number:200-47602-1 SDG Number:200-47602-1 Login Number: 47602 List Source:TestAmerica Burlington List Number: 1 Creator: McNabb, Robert W Question Answer Comment Radioactivity wasn't checked or is<1=background as measured by a survey N/A Lab does not accept radioactive samples. meter. The cooler's custody seal, if present, is intact. True 173830 Sample custody seals, if present, are intact. True The cooler or samples do not appear to have been compromised or True tampered with. Samples were received on ice. N/A Thermal preservation not required. Cooler Temperature is acceptable. True Cooler Temperature is recorded. N/A Thermal preservation not required. COC is present. True COC is filled out in ink and legible. True COC is filled out with all pertinent information. True Is the Field Sampler's name present on COC? True CA,JB • There are no discrepancies between the containers received and the COC. True Samples are received within Holding Time(excluding tests with immediate True 14 HTs) Sample containers have legible labels. True Containers are not broken or leaking. True Sample collection date/times are provided. True Appropriate sample containers are used. True Sample bottles are completely filled. N/A Sample Preservation Verified. True There is sufficient vol. for all requested analyses, incl. any requested True MS/MSDs Containers requiring zero headspace have no headspace or bubble is True <6mm(1/4"). Multiphasic samples are not present. True Samples do not require splitting or compositing. True Residual Chlorine Checked. N/A TestAmerica Burlington Page 44 of 407 3/7/2019 Pre-Shipment Clean Canist ertification Report Canister Cleaning&Pre-Shipment Leak Test System Ostn 3/4D Max x1DF# #Cycles0 6 1 Cleaning Start Date 444 I System Start Temp(s): I TechnicianhCan litr Size t Certification Type: ch Initial' Final Final Initial Reading Final Reading Port Can ID (psia)_ (psia)' Diff.' ("Hg) Gauge: Date: Time: Tech: Temp: Gauge: Date: Time: Tech:—Z.:'<--'e-T-- Tech: Temp: 1 5876 , D� k Q 7 r ��� - _Q( G26 /r`�I, /r 2-. CSC /� G26 /F`� .0 / �! 'C e- 2 4848 6 co G26 ' G26 3 4865 i G26 4 5941 a O e (9 e7 G26 G26 5 5854 e 1, ()i , DV G26 _ _ G26 6 3616 p V G26 G26 7 5917 4,05 .D4 G26 G26 8 4658 ! 47 S r 0 ( G26 026 6465 a© ( ''� G26 �� �/ G26 j--- 9 10 6359 /0'I ,- OC r 0 1 —`7,7. 1 G26 (5 it // S 7 -C - )� G26 2 /. Jy 11 5916 ,0(4 , py" . vc. �25,cj G26 1'9'/`7 75Z.� "...1E— � �G (( G26 f`�T1"1 �:� �� 12 5845 . ©4 c, c�e7 y G26 G26 t Batch Certification:The reading is taken on the"batch"canister and this value is used as the initial pressure for all canisters in the batch. 3 Difference=Final Preure-Initial Pressure. Acceptance Criteria: (1)The difference must be less than or equal to+0.25psi. (2)Pressure readings must be at least 24 hours apart. co If time frame was not met, the PM must authorize shipment of canister PM Authorization Date: m Clean Canister Certification Analysis&Authorization of Release to Inventory it Test Method:£y TO15;Routine:D 1015 LL Inventory Level Secondary Review 0 Can ID D to Sequence Analyst 1 2 3 4 LimitedReview Date Reviewer er 6359 I/ �' 3yl1b Pt XXXX tmrmN0 / { G � �Lv 3 ° 0 0 n ,T,» m3D CO - rn oc° y S, old Ils D r K N =.. J Inventory Level 1: Individual Canister Certification(TO15LL 0.01). Comments: Inventory Level 2: Individual or Batch Certification(TO15 0.04 ppbv). Inventory Level 3: Individual or Batch Certification(TO15 0.2 ppbv). Inventory Level Limited: Canisters may only be used for certain projects. .- D . 0) w Dup TeesNac gauges(enter IDs if included): 0 W o v Noo o Form ID:FAI023:12 co Revision Date:12/18/2018 TestAmerica Burlington ® _ _ _________ Pre-Shipment Clean Canister Certification Report Canister Cleaning&Pre-Shipment Leak Test System ID Max DF# #Cycles Cleaning Start Date/Time- System Start Temp(s): Technician Can Size Certification Type: Oven 3/4 150 26 1/9/2019 1502 21 21 EJE 1 liter batch Initial' Final Final Initial Reading Final Reading PortCan ID (psia) (psia) Diff.3 ("Hg) Gauge: Date: Time: Tech: Temp: Gauge: Date: Time: Tech: Temp: 1 6280 r Sri-- . : ! e.'y�JrS G26 /-/a`/? \r3 'mac 2 l G26 I'G f.!r g731 E '� 2 5949 ., ©2/ - � G26 G26 3 6286 :QC:0 r QC( G26 026 \ . 4 5930 F. 'Pt- , c7 G26 G26 5 6443 R ,Fj_Z G26 G26 6 6381 F©9 , ,o 2 G26 G26 7 5840 - r C57 e? G26 8 6277 . 0 . r ,(JC G26 G26 9 5875 . a2 , 4;7.� G26 l G26 10 3576 , 044? r c�fo A - ' G26 � / �`:7( G26 �� ,� 11 6279 e,n,C./ , pc - © ! ,rG�7 k, G26 /Z1./c:/ 5 G26 iZ ,` =f 2z( r` - 12 3812 77i y r. i.' • O £� -a' j G26 /A� -` AI 2\ G26 - Z.'" •OF "l 'Batch Certification:The reading is taken on the"batch"canister and this value is used as the initial pressure for all canisters in the batch. 3 Difference=Final Pressure-Initial Pressure. Acceptance Criteria: (1)The difference must be less than or equal to+0.25psi. (2)Pressure readings must be at least 24 hours apart. -17[1.) If time frame was n met, the PM must authorize shipment of canister PM Authorization Date: cp Clean Canister Certification Analysis&Authorization.of Release to Inventory rn Test Method: TO15Routine 0 TO15 LL Inventory Level Secondary Review o Can ID �� Sequence Analyst 1 2 3 4 Limited Review Review r9 Y O 6279 I f lil 3,1 0)2,dl, K P XXL 1//LOS i m r' N ((( vmv .00- -J a 0S' as -- y tom rn — g co N " -i— i � -'= N O A v0 ,.� ......, Inventory Level 1: Individual Canister Certification(TO15LL 0.01). Comments: Inventory Level 2: Individual or Batch Certification(TO15 0.04 ppbv). Inventory Level 3: Individual or Batch Certification(TO15 0.2 ppbv). > * 4 ,i a) c9i Inventory Level Limited: Canisters may only be used for certain projects. " CD o Dup TeesNac gauges(enter IDs if included): a) O w CO R3 Form ID:FA1023:12 co Revision Date:12/18/2018 TestAmerica Burlington i Pre-Shipment Clean Canist ertification Report Canister Cleaning&Pre-Shipment Leak Test System ID Max DF# #Cycles Cleaning Start Date/Time System Start Temp(s): Technician Can Size Certification Type: Oven 1/2 1 100 2/7/2019 1503 21 21 EJE 1 liter batch Initial' Final Final Initial Reading Final Reading Port Can ID (psia) (psiia}) Diff.3 ("Hg) Gauge: Date: Time: ,et Temp: Gauge: Date: Time:- Tech: Temp: 1 6278 s , J / F � 2: " G26 ' . `E7,411‘.... ,t%t G26 L: (.. `i :'- �k Z) © 6296 11=1. ,'0� , £%_ MN 026 ���� G26 111111111n11111.1.11.11111® 3809 .- „ lc, c7 == G26 i_�G26 ii • G26=11111 G26 mm mi■ © 6358 1.1.111611111r G _-_-_ --■_-.-■ 6 5493 111111 i 0440Z. Se G26 Ri .1 G26 ,�Z.-7 G26 G26 1.11111117 3817 ,::::0`t -. U G26 I G26 8 6360 , 0 9 r ® 1� G26 If G26 96351 J `I' ., &.'£2 G26 G26 J 10 5935 1 r,� ,/9 G26 G26I_ 1 i 11 5873 r'�Y ����''� `"'. r � G26 !. ��i_ G26 r' 12 6294 : !r!`-( `� 2 G26 g, _ , /0."7/ �`' . ti G26 zr F,l, j s 3C/ 5,._ t i r C,, Batch Certification:The reading is taken on the"batch"canister and this value is used as the initial pressure for all canisters in the batch. 3 Difference=Final Pressure-Initial Pressure. Acceptance Criteria: (1)The difference must be less than or equal to+0.25psi. (2)Pressure readings must be at least 24 hours apart. f time frame was ngt'met, the PM must authorize shipment of canister PM Authorization Date: • Clean Canister Certification Analysis&Authorization of Release to Inventory 'Test Method:-I6TO15 Routine 0 TO15 LL Inventory Level Secondary Review Can ID Date Sequence Analyst 1 2 3 4 Limited Review Date Reviewer 6294 2 ' t eq 1.39q,6xxxx WI z-/'1 (� (D mrm N 5 x F, A O _ V _� j m a nco = m D -- iv _ _ N rI- MIIMINM INIMIN Inventory Level 1: Individual Canister Certification(T015LL 0.01). Comments: Inventory Level 2: Individual or Batch Certification(T015 0.04 ppbv). Inventory Level 3: Individual or Batch Certification(7015 0.2 ppbv). Inventory Level Limited: Canisters may only be used for certain projects. H2O • —a, V o Dup TeesNac gauges(enter IDs if included): N CO o v N Co o Form ID:FAI023:12 co Revision Date:12/18/2018 TestAmerica Burlington — ----- Pre-Shipment Clean Canister Certification Report Canister Cleaning&Pre-Shipment Leak Test System ID Max DF# #Cycles Cleaning Start Date/Time System Start Temp(s): Technician Can Size Certification Type: Oven 1/2 1 100 2/11/2019 1433 21 21 EJE 1 liter batch Initial' Final Final Initial Reading Final Reading Port Can ID (psia) (psia) Diff3 ("Hg) Gauge: Date: Time: Tech: Temp: Gauge: Date: Time: Tech: Temp: 1 4963 , ,c . c7 I •— G26 Z'12°45 7:11' �i�i G26 Z'�� /31�, 7/�/' 2 6389 1 ,C`-( 0 1'L1 G26 ( 1 1G26 Zit s,\ie., i5 6-- .",:(,0 3 4649 r c 'c) 026 f G26 ?l7�i /' :tc7 �� Of-- 4 6477 ,r f- y G26 , G26 5 4668 c7 G26 G26 \ \. 6 5843 .(•2 _�v G26 I I G26 7 6413I ' K „ ) j G26 I ' G26 I 8 5923 II D4 , J' ✓ G26 I d G26 I 109 6483 G26 1 . j____ 4844 v • (� . d j, ,1 / , 2 G26 e.----- .i— G26 ) G26 ..41---' 1.--- I 5969 r•C2`1 , ED`-- , ,✓ —,34-,,LJ G26 2'/ /' � &-:- 11 2i2j' G26 7-i' /'3 iq! �.. Z.( 12 4861 ;c -t .c`(4 :-2c,€ G26 'L') '1i . Z/Z - G26 =&!? 1,;7."--ZO 'Batch Certification:The reading is taken on the"batch"canister and this value is used as the initial pressure for all canisters in the batch. 3 Difference=Final Pressure-Initial Pressure. Acceptance Criteria: (1)The difference must be less than or equal to+0.25psi. (2)Pressure readings must be at least 24 hours apart. "0 If time frame was nqt met, the PM must authorize shipment of canister PM Authorization Date: co / Clean Canister Certification Analysis&Authorization of Release to Inventory Test Method: 2TO15 Routine ❑TO15 LL Inventory Level Secondary Review Co Can ID Date Q, -��33Sequence Analyst 1 2 3 4 Limited Review Date Reviev 5969 s f i'l ),5 1t XXXX 2/"'7/' 3 2 ry 0 o m p p o � 1O O v amg -A N 3 D W n rn gt om o �� ^` Dom. 0 ..� Inventory Level 1: Individual Canister Certification(TO15LL 0.01). Comments: Inventory Level 2: Individual or Batch Certification(TO15 0.04 ppbv). Inventory Level 3: Individual or Batch Certification(TO15 0.2 ppbv). D It 4 o y 2 Inventory Level Limited: Canisters may only be used for certain projects. 7° !"> 0 v Dup TeesfVac gauges(enter IDs if included): tl1 0 co CD v n) Form ID:FAI023:12 cpcp Revision Date:12/18/2018 TestAmerica Burlington co „. �_ ��_. r�ti �.�-mow, _. �. , 1._,u.;:i--1; ,.-.�,�,:�,_ .,.,-a ., „�,_-,� s Pre-Shipment Clean Canist ertification Report Canister Cleaning&Pre-Shipment Leak Test System ID Max DF# #Cycles Cleaning Start Date/Time System Start Temp(s): Technician Can Size Certification Type: Oven 1/2 20 100 2/12/2019 1503 22 22 EJE 1 liter Individual Initial' Final Final Initial Reading Final Reading Port Can ID (psia) (psia) Diff.3 ("Hg) Gauge: Date: Time: Tech: Temp: Gauge: Date: Time: Tech: Temp: 1 5950 :, 0,; � . 0 l AK cI G26 Z./ t 7 2,'7-7' s 1 1 G26 :G f ', - 0 2 4951 t 0 L 9 G26 i I G2633691 e 0 >/5— 1 G26 G26 , 4 6322 n ., O i G26 G26 5 5891 ,1 0( 026I i , G26 07 ,OS G26 G26 6 4862 7 6486 04 f o 7 G26 G26 8 4860 .`^ a ( G26 026 9 4843 " ` ,,,DLA s �7( c..):_.`�� '� G26 <1 ,,I) 'fj�— G26 7, `rL A, ' 0� 10 6390 ) fe y G26 1 1 1 G26 ( l 11 4651 l'3 aQi 3 026 G26 ) i I 12 5948 rte` t G26 .,i..." ...1„ ,,, 1.-, G26 �- et----- Batch Certification:The reading is taken on the"batch"canister and this value is used as the initial pressure for all canisters in the batch. 3 Difference=Final Pressure-Initial Pressure. Acceptance Criteria: (1)The difference must be less than or equal to+0.25psi. (2)Pressure readings must be at least 24 hours apart. ,I If time frame was not met, the PM must authorize shipment of canister PM Authorization Date: � Clean Canister Certification Analysis&Authorization of Release to Inventory -Test Method: 21T015 Routine ❑T015 LL Inventory Level Secondary Review o Can ID Date Sequence Analyst 1 2 3 4 Limited Review Date Reviewer 1 5950 z iii/ot 13ga& ge. XXXX /4i/fI9 _ mmr,, N 2 4951 XXXX 2. g k `° s ` -dao 3 3691 (,- '. , XXXX a ;' 4 6322 XXXX r J 5 5891 �, XXXX :o p D � ),!, 6 4862 XXXX g- _ 7 6486 XXXX 8 4860 .� XXXX {1 o 10 9 46843 e — 113614.46 XXXX ���/! 90 XXXX o 11 4651 XXXX 12 5948L''' XXX i 1 _. ......_ Inventory Level 1: Individual Canister Certification(TO15LL 0.01). Comments: Inventory Level 2: Individual or Batch Certification(T015 0.04 ppbv). 0.2 INDV. Inventory Level 3: Individual or Batch Certification(T015 0.2 ppbv). It 4 o Inventory Level Limited: Canisters may only be used for certain projects. H2O a Dup TeesNac gauges(enter IDs if included): CA) 18 ---Zi ••••4 o N.) Form ID:FA1023:12 co Revision Date:12/18/2018 TestAmerica Burlington 01 ,J 11 ,i14, FORM I AIR - GC/MS VOA ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: TestAmerica Burlington Job No. : 200-46948-1 SDG No. : Client Sample ID: 6359 Lab Sample ID: 200-46948-10 ° Matrix: Air Lab File ID: 34110-22.D Analysis Method: TO-15 Date Collected: 01/08/2019 00:00 Sample wt/vol: 200 (mL) Date Analyzed: 01/13/2019 03:30 Soil Aliquot Vol: Dilution Factor: 1 ;, , il rP Soil Extract Vol. : GC Column: RTX-624 ID: 0.32 (mm) % Moisture: Level: (low/med) Low Analysis Batch No. : 139038 Units: ppb v/v CAS NO. COMPOUND NAME RESULT Q RL RL 115-07-1 Propylene 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 75-71-8 Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-45-6 Freon 22 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 76-14-2 1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 Efl 74-87-3 Chloromethane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 106-97-8 n-Butane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-01-4 Vinyl chloride 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 MONO 106-99-0 1,3-Butadiene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 74-83-9 Bromomethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-00-3 Chloroethane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 593-60-2 Bromoethene(Vinyl Bromide) 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-69-4 Trichlorofluoromethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 64-17-5 Ethanol 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 76-13-1 Freon TF 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-35-4 1,1-Dichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 67-64-1 Acetone 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 67-63-0 Isopropyl alcohol 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 75-15-0 Carbon disulfide 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 107-05-1 3-Chloropropene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-09-2 Methylene Chloride 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-65-0 tert-Butyl alcohol 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 1634-04-4 Methyl tert-butyl ether 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 156-60-5 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 110-54-3 n-Hexane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-34-3 1,1-Dichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-05-4 Vinyl acetate 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 141-78-6 Ethyl acetate 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 78-93-3 Methyl Ethyl Ketone 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 156-59-2 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 540-59-0 1,2-Dichloroethene, Total 0.40 U 0.40 0.40 67-66-3 Chloroform 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 109-99-9 Tetrahydrofuran 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 71-55-6 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 110-82-7 Cyclohexane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 56-23-5 Carbon tetrachloride 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 540-84-1 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 FORM I TO-15 Page 50 of 407 3/7/2019 01 FORM I AIR - GC/MS VOA ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: TestAmerica Burlington Job No. : 200-46948-1 SDG No. : Client Sample ID: 6359 Lab Sample ID: 200-46948-10 Matrix: Air Lab File ID: 34110-22.D Analysis Method: TO-15 Date Collected: 01/08/2019 00:00 Sample wt/vol: 200 (mL) Date Analyzed: 01/13/2019 03:30 Soil Aliquot Vol: Dilution Factor: 1 Soil Extract Vol. : GC Column: RTX-624 ID: 0.32 (mm) % Moisture: Level: (low/med) Low Analysis Batch No. : 139038 Units: ppb v/v CAS NO. COMPOUND NAME RESULT Q RL RL 71-43-2 Benzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 107-06-2 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 142-82-5 n-Heptane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 ( 79-01-6 Trichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 =: 80-62-6 Methyl methacrylate 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 78-87-5 - 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 123-91-1 1,4-Dioxane 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 . 75-27-4 Bromodichloromethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20El 10061-01-5 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-10-1 methyl isobutyl ketone 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 108-88-3 Toluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 10061-02-6 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 79-00-5 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 127-18-4 Tetrachloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 591-78-6 Methyl Butyl Ketone (2-Hexanone) 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 124-48-1 Dibromochloromethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 106-93-4 1,2-Dibromoethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-90-7 Chlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 100-41-4 Ethylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 179601-23-1 m,p-Xylene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 95-47-6 Xylene, o- 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 1330-20-7 Xylene (total) 0.70 U 0.70 0.70 100-42-5 Styrene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-25-2 Bromoform 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 98-82-8 Cumene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 79-34-5 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 103-65-1 n-Propylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 622-96-8 4-Ethyltoluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-67-8 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 95-49-8 2-Chlorotoluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 98-06-6 tert-Butylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 95-63-6 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 135-98-8 sec-Butylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 99-87-6 4-Isopropyltoluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 541-73-1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 106-46-7 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 FORM I TO-15 Page 51 of 407 3/7/2019 FORM I AIR - GC/MS VOA ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: TestAmerica Burlington Job No. : 200-46948-1 SDG No. : Client Sample ID: 6359 Lab Sample ID: 200-46948-10 Matrix: Air Lab File ID: 34110-22.D Analysis Method: TO-15 Date Collected: 01/08/2019 00:00 Sample wt/vol: 200 (mL) Date Analyzed: 01/13/2019 03:30 Soil Aliquot Vol: Dilution Factor: 1 Soil Extract Vol. : GC Column: RTX-624 ID: 0.32 (mm) % Moisture: Level: (low/med) Low Analysis Batch No. : 139038 Units: ppb v/v CAS NO. COMPOUND NAME RESULT Q RL RL 100-44-7 Benzyl chloride 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 104-51-8 n-Butylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 95-50-1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 120-82-1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 f''. 1 87-68-3 Hexachlorobutadiene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 91-20-3 Naphthalene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 AO FORM I TO-15 Page 52 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Jan-2019 08:35:28 Chrom Revision: 2.3 13-Dec-2018 17:23:12 TestAmerica Burlington Target Compound Quantitation Report Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190112-34110.b\34110-22.D Lims ID: 200-46948-A-10 Client ID: 6359 Sample Type: Client Inject. Date: 13-Jan-2019 03:30:30 ALS Bottle#: 21 Worklist Smp#: 23 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Sample Info: 200-0034110-023 Misc. Info.: 46911-12 Operator ID: ggg Instrument ID: CHB.i Method: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\201 90112-34110.b\TO15_LLNJ_TO3.m Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Last Update: 14-Jan-2019 08:35:28 Calib Date: 10-Jan-2019 13:03:30 Integrator: RTE ID Type: Deconvolution ID Quant Method: Internal/External Standard Quant By: Initial Calibration Last ICal File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190109-34081.b\34081-16.D Column 1 : RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Det: MS SCAN Process Host: CTX1019 First Level Reviewer: desjardinsb Date: 14-Jan-2019 08:35:28 RT Adj RT Dlt RT OnCol Amt Compound Sig (min.) (min.) (min.) Q Response ppb v/v Flags 1 Propene 41 3.135 ND 2 Dichlorodifluoromethane 85 3.193 ND • 3 Chlorodifluoromethane 51 3.225 NDEl 4 1,2-Dichloro-1,1,2,2-tetra 85 3.412 ND 5 Chloromethane 50 3.535 ND 6 Butane 43 3.706 ND 7 Vinyl chloride 62 3.743 ND 8 Butadiene 54 3.807 ND 10 Bromomethane 94 4.464 ND 11 Chloroethane 64 4.693 ND 13 Vinyl bromide 106 5.099 ND 14 Trichlorofluoromethane 101 5.200 ND 16 Ethanol 45 5.654 ND 19 1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trif 101 6.225 ND 20 1,1-Dichloroethene 96 6.289 ND 21 Acetone 43 6.438 ND 22 Isopropyl alcohol 45 6.657 ND 23 Carbon disulfide 76 6.721 ND 24 3-Chloro-1-propene 41 6.988 ND 27 Methylene Chloride 49 7.244 ND 28 2-Methyl-2-propanol 59 7.356 ND 29 Methyl tert-butyl ether 73 7.596 ND 30 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 61 7.655 ND 32 Hexane 57 7.991 7.981 0.005 90 11351 0.1426 33 1,1-Dichloroethane 63 8.392 ND 34 Vinyl acetate 43 8.397 ND 36 2-Butanone (MEK) 72 9.277 ND 37 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 96 9.293 ND 35 Ethyl acetate 88 9.299 ND * 39 Chlorobromomethane 128 9.656 9.662 -0.006 79 431322 10.0 38 Tetrahydrofuran 42 9.672 ND Page 53 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Jan-2019 08:35:28 Chrom Revision: 2.3 13-Dec-2018 17:23:12 Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\201 901 1 2-341 1 0.b\34110-22.D RT Adj RT Dlt RT OnCol Amt Compound Sig (min.) (min.) (min.) Q Response ppb v/v Flags 40 Chloroform 83 9.736 ND 42 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 97 9.993 ND S 41 1,2-Dichloroethene, Total 61 10.000 ND 43 Cyclohexane 84 10.014 ND 44 Carbon tetrachloride 117 10.201 ND 45 Isooctane 57 10.484 ND 46 Benzene 78 10.521 ND 47 1,2-Dichloroethane 62 10.617 ND 48 n-Heptane 43 10.740 ND * 50 1,4-Difluorobenzene 114 11.060 11.065 -0.005 94 1927801 10.0 53 Trichloroethene 95 11.434 ND 54 1,2-Dichloropropane 63 11.802 ND 55 Methyl methacrylate 69 11.839 ND 56 1,4-Dioxane 88 11.930 ND 57 Dibromomethane 174 11.989 ND 58 Dichlorobromomethane 83 12.159 ND 60 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 75 12.789 ND 61 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK 43 12.933 ND 64 Toluene 92 13.221 ND 66 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 75 13.579 ND 67 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 83 13.851 ND 68 Tetrachloroethene 166 13.995 ND 69 2-Hexanone 43 14.113 ND 70 Chlorodibromomethane 129 14.406 ND 1 71 Ethylene Dibromide 107 14.609 ND * 72 Chlorobenzene-d5 117 15.175 15.175 -0.001 84 1596109 10.0 73 Chlorobenzene 112 15.212 ND 74 Ethylbenzene 91 15.287 15.276 0.006 94 6982 0.0305 76 m-Xylene& p-Xylene 106 15.431 ND 78 o-Xylene 106 15.943 ND 79 Styrene 104 15.965 ND S 77 Xylenes, Total 106 16.000 ND 80 Bromoform 173 16.258 ND 81 lsopropylbenzene 105 16.354 ND 83 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 83 16.760 ND 84 N-Propylbenzene 91 16.840 ND 87 4-Ethyltoluene 105 16.963 ND 88 2-Chlorotoluene 91 17.005 ND 89 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 105 17.027 ND 91 tert-Butylbenzene 119 17.400 ND 92 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 105 17.475 ND 93 sec-Butylbenzene 105 17.662 ND 94 4-Isopropyltoluene 119 17.811 ND 95 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 146 17.891 ND 96 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 146 17.998 ND 97 Benzyl chloride 91 18.147 ND 99 n-Butylbenzene 91 18.318 ND 100 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 146 18.484 ND 103 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 180 20.827 ND 104 Hexachlorobutadiene 225 20.997 ND 105 Naphthalene 128 21.301 ND Page 54 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Jan-2019 08:35:28 Chrom Revision: 2.3 13-Dec-2018 17:23:12 Reagents: ATTO15BISs_00006 Amount Added: 20.00 Units: mL Run Reagent 1:12 Page 55 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date:14-Jan-2019 08:35:28 Chrom Revision:2.3 13-Dec-2018 17:23:12 TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\201 90112-34110.b\34110-22.D Injection Date: 13-Jan-2019 03:30:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Operator ID: ggg Lims ID: 200-46948-A-10 Lab Sample ID: 200-46948-10 Worklist Smp#: 23 Client ID: 6359 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil.Factor: 1.0000 ALS Bottle#: 21 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column:RTX-624(0.32 mm) Y Scaling:Method Defined:Scale to the Nth Largest Target:1 Kd 2 + 34110-22[MS SCAN Chro]:Total .«rt` u o n 2 4 6 21 a c .bm 21 C ) � 1• o O 1: 0 U a 1 in « 0 1: Ci 1 wm L U I 1 0 U 11 « e • II IIUt WIWl II IO I 1I 6 II ME MW U U 1I U JII II o uu Y SAL•III ILLIIp1 III ll till MI Imm1 Is 1II II I■W II u1me■• I I IA IU 1111110 II IW Ut G 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 Min Page 56 of 407 3/7/2019 FORM I AIR - GC/MS VOA ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: TestAmerica Burlington Job No. : 200-46969-1 SDG No. : Client Sample ID: 6279 Lab Sample ID: 200-46969-11 -' Matrix: Air Lab File ID: 34102-08.D Analysis Method: TO-15 Date Collected: 01/09/2019 00:00 Sample wt/vol: 200 (mL) Date Analyzed: 01/11/2019 18:16 Soil Aliquot Vol: Dilution Factor: 1 Soil Extract Vol. : GC Column: RTX-624 ID: 0.32 (mm) % Moisture: Level: (low/med) Low Analysis Batch No. : 139017 Units: ppb v/v CAS NO. COMPOUND NAME RESULT Q RL RL 115-07-1 Propylene 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 75-71-8 Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-45-6 Freon 22 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 76-14-2 1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 74-87-3 Chloromethane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 106-97-8 n-Butane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-01-4 Vinyl chloride 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 106-99-0 1,3-Butadiene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20110 74-83-9 Bromomethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-00-3 Chloroethane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 593-60-2 Bromoethene(Vinyl Bromide) 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-69-4 Trichlorofluoromethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 64-17-5 Ethanol 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 76-13-1 Freon TF 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-35-4 1,1-Dichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 67-64-1 Acetone 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 67-63-0 Isopropyl alcohol 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 75-15-0 Carbon disulfide 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 107-05-1 3-Chloropropene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-09-2 Methylene Chloride 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-65-0 tert-Butyl alcohol 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 1634-04-4 Methyl tert-butyl ether 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 156-60-5 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 110-54-3 n-Hexane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-34-3 1,1-Dichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-05-4 Vinyl acetate 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 141-78-6 Ethyl acetate 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 78-93-3 Methyl Ethyl Ketone 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 156-59-2 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 540-59-0 1,2-Dichloroethene, Total 0.40 U 0.40 0.40 67-66-3 Chloroform 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 109-99-9 Tetrahydrofuran 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 71-55-6 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 110-82-7 Cyclohexane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 56-23-5 Carbon tetrachloride 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 540-84-1 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 FORM I TO-15 Page 57 of 407 3/7/2019 FORM I AIR - GC/MS VOA ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: TestAmerica Burlington Job No. : 200-46969-1 SDG No. : Client Sample ID: 6279 Lab Sample ID: 200-46969-11 x: -144 Matrix: Air Lab File ID: 34102-08.D Analysis Method: TO-15 Date Collected: 01/09/2019 00:00 Sample wt/vol: 200 (mL) Date Analyzed: 01/11/2019 18:16 Soil Aliquot Vol: Dilution Factor: 1 Soil Extract Vol. : GC Column: RTX-624 ID: 0.32 (mm) % Moisture: Level: (low/med) Low Analysis Batch No. : 139017 Units: ppb v/v CAS NO. COMPOUND NAME RESULT Q RL RL 71-43-2 Benzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 107-06-2 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 142-82-5 n-Heptane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 Og 79-01-6 Trichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 80-62-6 Methyl methacrylate 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 78-87-5 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 123-91-1 1,4-Dioxane 5.0 U 5.0 5.001.1 75-27-4 Bromodichloromethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 10061-01-5 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-10-1 methyl isobutyl ketone 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 108-88-3 Toluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 10061-02-6 trans-l,3-Dichloropropene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 79-00-5 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 127-18-4 Tetrachloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 591-78-6 Methyl Butyl Ketone (2-Hexanone) 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 124-48-1 Dibromochloromethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 106-93-4 1,2-Dibromoethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-90-7 Chlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 100-41-4 Ethylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 179601-23-1 m,p-Xylene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 95-47-6 Xylene, o- 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 1330-20-7 Xylene (total) 0.70 U 0.70 0.70 100-42-5 Styrene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-25-2 Bromoform 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 98-82-8 Cumene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 79-34-5 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 103-65-1 n-Propylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 622-96-8 4-Ethyltoluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-67-8 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 95-49-8 2-Chlorotoluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 98-06-6 tert-Butylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 95-63-6 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 135-98-8 sec-Butylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 99-87-6 4-Isopropyltoluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 541-73-1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 106-46-7 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 FORM I TO-15 Page 58 of 407 3/7/2019 r, FORM I AIR - GC/MS VOA ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: TestAmerica Burlington Job No. : 200-46969-1 SDG No. : Client Sample ID: 6279 Lab Sample ID: 200-46969-11 9 Matrix: Air Lab File ID: 34102-08.D Analysis Method: TO-15 Date Collected: 01/09/2019 00:00 Sample wt/vol: 200 (mL) Date Analyzed: 01/11/2019 18:16 Soil Aliquot Vol: Dilution Factor: 1 Soil Extract Vol. : GC Column: RTX-624 ID: 0.32 (mm) % Moisture: Level: (low/med) Low Analysis Batch No. : 139017 Units: ppb v/v CAS NO. COMPOUND NAME RESULT Q RL RL 100-44-7 Benzyl chloride 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 104-51-8 n-Butylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 95-50-1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 120-82-1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 `,5 87-68-3 Hexachlorobutadiene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 91-20-3 Naphthalene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 1111 FORM I TO-15 Page 59 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Jan-2019 13:00:46 Chrom Revision: 2.3 13-Dec-2018 17:23:12 TestAmerica Burlington Target Compound Quantitation Report Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190111-34102.b\34102-08.D Lims ID: 200-46969-A-11 Client ID: 6279 Sample Type: Client Inject. Date: 11-Jan-2019 18:16:30 ALS Bottle#: 7 Worklist Smp#: 8 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Sample Info: 200-0034102-008 Misc. Info.: 46969-11 Operator ID: ggg Instrument ID: CHB.i Method: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190111-34102.b\TO15_LLNJ_TO3.m Limit Group: Al_TO15_ICAL Last Update: 14-Jan-2019 13:00:45 Calib Date: 10-Jan-2019 13:03:30 Integrator: RTE ID Type: Deconvolution ID Quant Method: Internal/External Standard Quant By: Initial Calibration Last ICal File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190109-34081.b\34081-16.D Column 1 : RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Det: MS SCAN Process Host: CTX0303 First Level Reviewer: puangmaleek Date: 14-Jan-2019 13:00:45 RT Adj RT Dlt RT OnCol Amt Compound Sig (min.) (min.) (min.) Q Response ppb v/v Flags 1 Propene 41 3.135 ND U 2 Dichlorodifluoromethane 85 3.193 ND 3 Chlorodifluoromethane 51 3.225 ND U 4 1,2-Dichloro-1,1,2,2-tetra 85 3.407 ND IF 5 Chloromethane 50 3.530 ND 6 Butane 43 3.706 ND 7 Vinyl chloride 62 3.738 ND 8 Butadiene 54 3.802 ND 10 Bromomethane 94 4.458 ND 11 Chloroethane 64 4.688 ND 13 Vinyl bromide 106 5.093 ND 14 Trichlorofluoromethane 101 5.195 ND 16 Ethanol 45 5.648 ND U 19 1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trif 101 6.219 ND 20 1,1-Dichloroethene 96 6.289 ND 21 Acetone 43 6.433 ND U 22 Isopropyl alcohol 45 6.657 ND 23 Carbon disulfide 76 6.721 ND 24 3-Chloro-l-propene 41 6.983 ND 27 Methylene Chloride 49 7.239 ND 28 2-Methyl-2-propanol 59 7.351 ND 29 Methyl tert-butyl ether 73 7.596 ND 30trans-l,2-Dichloroethene 61 7.650 ND 32 Hexane 57 7.991 7.986 0.005 85 13539 0.1454 33 1,1-Dichloroethane 63 8.391 ND 34 Vinyl acetate 43 8.397 ND 36 2-Butanone(MEK) 72 9.277 ND 37 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 96 9.293 ND 35 Ethyl acetate 88 9.299 ND 39 Chlorobromomethane 128 9.656 9.662 -0.006 77 504728 10.0 38 Tetrahydrofuran 42 9.672 ND Page 60 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Jan-2019 13:00:46 Chrom Revision: 2.3 13-Dec-2018 17:23:12 Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190111-34102.b\34102-08.D RT Adj RT Dlt RT OnCol Amt Compound Sig (min.) (min.) (min.) Q Response ppb v/v Flags 40 Chloroform 83 9.736 ND 42 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 97 9.998 ND S 41 1,2-Dichloroethene, Total 61 10.000 ND 43 Cyclohexane 84 10.014 ND 44 Carbon tetrachloride 117 10.206 ND ,: 45 Isooctane 57 10.489 ND 46 Benzene 78 10.526 ND 47 1,2-Dichloroethane 62 10.622 ND 48 n-Heptane 43 10.740 ND * 50 1,4-Difluorobenzene 114 11.060 11.065 -0.005 93 2255059 10.0 53 Trichloroethene 95 11.439 ND 54 1,2-Dichloropropane 63 11.802 ND 55 Methyl methacrylate 69 11.844 ND 56 1,4-Dioxane 88 11.930 ND 57 Dibromomethane 174 11.989 ND 58 Dichlorobromomethane 83 12.159 ND 60 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 75 12.789 ND 61 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK 43 12.933 ND 64 Toluene 92 13.237 13.221 0.016 93 3851 0.0312 66 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 75 13.579 ND 67 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 83 13.851 ND 68 Tetrachloroethene 166 14.001 ND 69 2-Hexanone 43 14.113 ND 70 Chlorodibromomethane 129 14.406 ND El 71 Ethylene Dibromide 107 14.609 ND * 72 Chlorobenzene-d5 117 15.175 15.180 -0.005 83 1871442 10.0 73 Chlorobenzene 112 15.217 ND U 74 Ethylbenzene 91 15.287 15.287 0.000 95 8700 0.0325 76 m-Xylene& p-Xylene 106 15.431 ND U 78 o-Xylene 106 15.943 ND 79 Styrene 104 15.970 ND S 77 Xylenes, Total 106 16.000 ND 80 Bromoform 173 16.258 ND 81 Isopropylbenzene 105 16.359 ND U 83 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 83 16.765 ND 84 N-Propylbenzene 91 16.840 ND U 87 4-Ethyltoluene 105 16.963 ND U 88 2-Chlorotoluene 91 17.005 ND U 89 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 105 17.032 ND U 91 tert-Butylbenzene 119 17.405 ND 92 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 105 17.475 ND U 93 sec-Butylbenzene 105 17.662 ND U 94 4-Isopropyltoluene 119 17.811 ND U 95 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 146 17.891 ND 96 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 146 18.003 ND 97 Benzyl chloride 91 18.147 ND U 99 n-Butylbenzene 91 18.318 ND U 100 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 146 18.484 ND U 103 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 180 20.832 ND U 104 Hexachlorobutadiene 225 20.997 ND 105 Naphthalene 128 21.301 ND U Page 61 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Jan-2019 13:00:46 Chrom Revision: 2.3 13-Dec-2018 17:23:12 QC Flag Legend Review Flags U - Marked Undetected Reagents: ATTO15BISs_00006 Amount Added: 20.00 Units: mL Run Reagent NMI Page 62 of 407 3/7/2019. Report Date:14-Jan-2019 13:00:46 Chrom Revision:2.3 13-Dec-2018 17:23:12 TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190111-34102.b\34102-08.D Injection Date: 11-Jan-2019 18:16:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Operator ID: ggg Lims ID: 200-46969-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-46969-11 Worklist Smp#: 8 Client ID: 6279 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil.Factor: 1.0000 ALS Bottle#: 7 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column:RTX-624(0.32 mm) Y Scaling:Method Defined:Scale to the Nth Largest Target:1 a 5,1 28 + 34102-08[MS SCAN Chro]:Total .' o 1--- 27- N 28- z5 ; LO ;, 24- ai :11,3 23- 2 0 22- o s U 21- 20- LO 19' oLOI 0 18- I s1r 0 16- o E x_ 15- > 14 a 13- -a U 17 IM 11- 10- 9 t10- 1 S P a a 4 2' t ❑I U a u�I. 1 unn■ Ili ILLIR w uR . an. III u/u to Ill 1 I IULL u 1 [Ill 1111 111)11]II 11Ia 1E1 b I� IitirlyI I I1I I Illlullull luniu 1 u I 0 1 11 11e 11 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 Min Page 63 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Jan-2019 13:00:46 Chrom Revision: 2.3 13-Dec-2018 17:23:12 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190111-34102.b\34102-08.D Injection Date: 11-Jan-2019 18:16:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-46969-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-46969-11 Client ID: 6279 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 7 Worklist Smp#: 8 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15LLNJTO3 Limit Group: Al 1015 ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 1 Propene, CAS: 115-07-1 Processing Results 3 Raw Spec:Scan 31(3.15) m/z 41.0 40 45- v 31 qa" O 2 0 36- X x 27, / \ � � > 21 > 18- I I I I 1 44X 11 9' 0 - - ► — , 1 1 - - , III 78' I 207"I 3.0 3.3 ` Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 V4T 1 m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 31(3.15),Qvalue=1 m/z 42.0 3 40 2 31 O 21 cp X 2 x 1 >- 21 } 11 1 44 11 i III 78) 2071 3.0 3.3 i Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 RT I m/7 Ref Spec: 1 Propene (NIST) m/z 39.0 11 i 42- I 41 35- o X42 0 28- 5 X X 21- '� >- 14- 7 .d 0 - - - 1 1 , — 3.0 3.3 ` Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 irT 1 RT Mass Response Amount 3.15 41.00 788 0.033396 3.13 42.00 0 3.15 39.00 835 Reviewer: puangmaleek, 14-Jan-2019 12:56:07 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 64 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Jan-2019 13:00:46 Chrom Revision: 2.3 13-Dec-2018 17:23:12 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190111-34102.b\34102-08.D Injection Date: 11-Jan-2019 18:16:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-46969-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-46969-11 Client ID: 6279 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 7 Worklist Smp#: 8 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJTO3 Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 3 Chlorodifluoromethane, CAS: 75-45-6 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 28(3.13) m/z 51.0 31 40 21 21 c 2 0 1: x 21 x 1 >- >- 1 44 rn N_ 11 • 06 I II I�51 781 2071 3.1 Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 FT m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 28(3.13),Qvalue=1 m/z 67.0 31 EE1 40 T o 2 X 21 1 X44 11 III (51 78�1 2071 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 3.1 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 3 Chlorodifluoromethane (NIST) m/z 69.0 51 21 0 0 1: X x • 67 : 3.1 Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 FT RT Mass Response Amount 3.13 51.00 78 0.001572 3.23 67.00 0 3.23 69.00 0 Reviewer: puangmaleek, 14-Jan-2019 12:56:10 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 65 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Jan-2019 13:00:46 Chrom Revision: 2.3 13-Dec-2018 17:23:12 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190111-34102.b\34102-08.D Injection Date: 11-Jan-2019 18:16:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-46969-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-46969-11 Client ID: 6279 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 7 Worklist Smp#: 8 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15LLNJTO3 Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 16 Ethanol, CAS: 64-17-5 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 517(5.74) m/z 45.0 31 T 0 2 •c O C ;--< 21 X >- >- 1 11 -44 II207N1 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 5.6 m/7 Min Enhanced Spec:Scan 517(5.74),Qvalue=1 m/z 46.0 31 2 21 X } } 11 -44 II2071 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 5.6 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 16 Ethanol (NIST) 0 0 o_ X 746 .I. . 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 RT Mass Response Amount 5.74 45.00 137 0.009835 5.65 46.00 0 Reviewer: puangmaleek, 14-Jan-2019 12:56:15 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 66 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Jan-2019 13:00:46 Chrom Revision:2.3 13-Dec-2018 17:23:12 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\201 901 1 1-341 02.b\34102-08.D Injection Date: 11-Jan-2019 18:16:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-46969-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-46969-11 Client ID: 6279 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 7 Worklist Smp#: 8 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AI_TO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 21 Acetone, CAS: 67-64-1 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 659(6.50) m/z 43.0 31 4: 0 2 41 o 0 3 21 j< >- } 2• 1 1: 11 '44 207 I 6.2 6.5 Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 4ZT m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 659(6.50),Qvalue=1 m/z 58.0 I I31 21 • 2I X 1 } >- 1 1 11 'P44 • 207�I 6.2 6.5 Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 FT I m/7 Ref Spec: 21 Acetone (NIST) 11 • X 58'' .,I, 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 RT Mass Response Amount 6.50 43.00 1494 0.025440 6.43 58.00 0 Reviewer: puangmaleek, 14-Jan-2019 12:56:33 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 67 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Jan-2019 13:00:46 Chrom Revision: 2.3 13-Dec-2018 17:23:12 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190111-34102.b\34102-08.D Injection Date: 11-Jan-2019 18:16:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-46969-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-46969-11 Client ID: 6279 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 7 Worklist Smp#: 8 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: 1015LLNJT03 Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 73 Chlorobenzene, CAS: 108-90-7 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 2293(15.22) m/z 112.0 i 1 117 31 N u _0 11 0 2' x x 1: > 82'` � : 1 '119 ' 40� 52� 54 t� 116 i . . I ..II I $.liil� ...I1. 15.1 i Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 FT m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 2293(15.22),Qvalue=l m/z 77.0 r 7: 1 117 06 0 11 0 0 0 5 X X 3. 40 >- 82 >- 6 2. 7119 1 40\ i52 ' X54 116 i . 1 ..II I 8.IIII� ...I1. 15.1 i Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 FT 1 m17 Ref Spec: 73 Chlorobenzenehl (NIST) m/z 114.0 11 112 35 N Ic o 0 2: o oi X 21 x >. — 77 1, -'114 511 i 15.1 .I.- - --.I._.I. .._ ...th i- ... .I. Min i 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 FT I RT Mass Response Amount 15.22 112.00 348 0.002080 15.22 77.00 0 15.20 114.00 127 Reviewer: puangmaleek, 14-Jan-2019 12:57:41 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 68 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Jan-2019 13:00:46 Chrom Revision: 2.3 13-Dec-2018 17:23:12 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\201 901 1 1-341 02.b\34102-08.D Injection Date: 11-Jan-2019 18:16:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-46969-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-46969-11 Client ID: 6279 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 7 Worklist Smp#: 8 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15LLNJTO3 Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 ( 0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 76 m-Xylene & p-Xylene, CAS: 179601-23-1 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 2334(15.44) m/z 106.0 2: 2, 0 2, 21 0 0 X 21 X 1: >- 1: > 1 1 744 91\) I117I 207" — 15.3 i Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 KT i m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 2334(15.44),Qvalue=0 m/z 91.0 2: 6: 0 2, 5 I x 21 x4, 821 >-1: >. 3 1 2 X44 11 • 91' I17NI 207 ' 15.3 p Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 FT I m17 RT Mass Response Amount 15.44 106.00 163 0.001548 15.44 91.00 854 Reviewer: puangmaleek, 14-Jan-2019 12:57:46 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 69 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Jan-2019 13:00:46 Chrom Revision: 2.3 13-Dec-2018 17:23:12 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\201 901 1 1-341 02.b\34102-08.D Injection Date: 11-Jan-2019 18:16:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-46969-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-46969-11 Client ID: 6279 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 7 Worklist Smp#: 8 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 ( 0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 81 Isopropylbenzene, CAS: 98-82-8 Processing Results 3 Raw Spec:Scan 2507(16.36) m/z 105.0 03 2: 31 o_ 2, 0 2, x 21 x 1: } 11 } 1 1 • X44 207 ` 105N1 I 253 I I 16.2 16.5 ` Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 KT 1 m/7 3 Enhanced Spec:Scan 2507(16.36),Qvalue=1 m/z 120.0 2: T 01 1P 2 c O C X 21 X >- 1: >- 1 • I'44I 207' • 105) 253 1 I i i 1 1 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 16.2 16.5 m17 Min 11 Ref Spec: 81 Isopropylbenzene (NIST) m/z 77.0 105 E c O C _o X X >-. • 77N9 X120 .L. III, ...d.1 J.. 1. ...I1 , 1 i 1 I 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 16.2 16.5 Min RT Mass Response Amount 16.36 105.00 374 0.001259 16.36 120.00 0 16.36 77.00 0 Reviewer: puangmaleek, 14-Jan-2019 12:57:51 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 70 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Jan-2019 13:00:46 Chrom Revision: 2.3 13-Dec-2018 17:23:12 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190111-34102.b\34102-08.D Injection Date: 11-Jan-2019 18:16:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-46969-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-46969-11 Client ID: 6279 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 7 Worklist Smp#: 8 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: T015LLNJT03 Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 84 N-Propylbenzene, CAS: 103-65-1 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 2602(16.87) m/z 91.0 4: `D 2: 0 2, 41 O _o _0 3 X 21 X >- 1: } 2• 1 1: 207N X44 • " I 95II 133) 176NI 232NI 253`1 I ` 16.7 17.0 r, Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 FT I m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 2602(16.87),Qvalue=1 m/z 120.0 2: 5, 0, M 2, E • X 21 X } 11 >- 1 207 '_44 • -,),..I 95II ` 13n 1761 232) 253 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 16.7 17.0 m/7 M i n 11 Ref Spec: 84 N-Propylbenzene (NIST) m/z 92.0 91 • 'E o 5 0 O X > 120'" 65N1- .I. 92J I 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 16.7 17.0 Min RT Mass Response Amount 16.87 91.00 460 0.001341 16.84 120.00 0 16.84 92.00 0 Reviewer: puangmaleek, 14-Jan-2019 12:57:54 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 71 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Jan-2019 13:00:46 Chrom Revision: 2.3 13-Dec-2018 17:23:12 i`° User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190111-34102.b\34102-08.D Injection Date: 11-Jan-2019 18:16:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-46969-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-46969-11 Client ID: 6279 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 7 Worklist Smp#: 8 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 87 4-Ethyltoluene, CAS: 622-96-8 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 2620(16.96) m/z 105.1 4: co up 2: cr 41 co 0 2, _o 0 3 X 21 X } 1: � 2, 1: 1 207" •• X4473� 105" i 1'119 1911 232 26 "1 I I 16.8 17.1 Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 !T I m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 2620(16.96),Qvalue=1 m/z 120.0 2: 1 5 2A o c X 21 >- 1: >- 1 1 207" • 1/44 73N 1 5N 26 N 1119 1911 2321 I i i r i 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 16.8 17.1 rn/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 87 4-Ethyltoluene (NIST) 105 0 0 0 X '120 91\ i 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 RT Mass Response Amount 16.96 105.00 585 0.001982 16.96 120.00 0 Reviewer: puangmaleek, 14-Jan-2019 12:57:56 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 72 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Jan-2019 13:00:47 Chrom Revision: 2.3 13-Dec-2018 17:23:12 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190111-34102.b\34102-08.D Injection Date: 11-Jan-2019 18:16:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-46969-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-46969-11 Client ID: 6279 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 7 Worklist Smp#: 8 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 89 1 ,3,5-Trimethylbenzene, CAS: 108-67-8 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 2632(17.03) m/z 105.0 2: 31 a 2, 2 0 21 X 21 >- 1: } 1 1 11 X44 207N ` I 73 I 91) I�105 176NI I 232Ni 253N1 16.9 Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 FT `i m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 2632(17.03),Qvalue=1 m/z 120.0 2: a 2, •E ;--< 21 } 11 >- 1 207N 1207N r44 ` I 73�I 91NI (105 176"I I I 232"I 253 NI 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 16.9 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 89 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene (NIST) 105 o '120 X 6 • 7�I ...I 79 7 I i 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 RT Mass Response Amount 17.03 105.00 170 0.000703 17.03 120.00 0 Reviewer: puangmaleek, 14-Jan-2019 13:00:10 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 73 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Jan-2019 13:00:47 Chrom Revision: 2.3 13-Dec-2018 17:23:12 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190111-34102.b\34102-08.D Injection Date: 11-Jan-2019 18:16:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-46969-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-46969-11 Client ID: 6279 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 7 Worklist Smp#: 8 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15LLNJTO3 Limit Group: AlTO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 88 2-Chlorotoluene, CAS: 95-49-8 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 2629(17.01) m/z 91.0 2: 4 .. 0 2, 3 1' 0 0 2: X 21 X >- 11 1 } 21 1, 1 744 2071 • 91" 253" I 126"I 1'133 1771 1'208 I I 16.9 ` Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 VZT 1 ;;' m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 2629(17.01),Qvalue=1 m/z 63.0 2: : 0 2, c O S II X 21 X >- 11 )- 1 1 X44 207" • 911 253" II 126"1 1'133 177"I 1'208 I I i i i 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 16.9 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 88 2-Chlorotoluene (NIST) 91 0 0 0 X ' 126" 631 39� i 90" 789 .1.1-.,I. ii ....I�I. .65 _Id. 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 RT Mass Response Amount 17.01 91.00 545 0.002349 17.01 63.00 0 Reviewer: puangmaleek, 14-Jan-2019 12:57:58 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 74 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Jan-2019 13:00:47' Chrom Revision: 2.3 13-Dec-2018 17:23:12 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190111-34102.b\34102-08.D Injection Date: 11-Jan-2019 18:16:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-46969-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-46969-11 Client ID: 6279 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 7 Worklist Smp#: 8 4. Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL `` Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 92 1 ,2,4-Tri methyl benzene, CAS: 95-63-6 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 2718(17.49) 3: m/z 105.0 2, • 31 i 0 21 0 0 2, X 1: x -- -- 1: >- 1 } /44 207N 1 253 731 10151 13511 191'1 (209 I I 17.4 Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 IIT m/? Enhanced Spec:Scan 2718(17.49),Qvalue=1 m/z 120.0 2, _T 0 21 C • o X 1: X Et3 > 1 >. X44 207N • 253 • 73 I 10151 13511 191N1 x209 G i i 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 17.4 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 92 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene (NIST) 105 o 0 0 X '120 77N. J Li ....it ...61. .1. III Lrlr 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 RT Mass Response Amount 17.49 105.00 280 0.001167 17.47 120.00 0 Reviewer: puangmaleek, 14-Jan-2019 13:00:12 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 75 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Jan-2019 13:00:47 Chrom Revision: 2.3 13-Dec-2018 17:23:12 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190111-34102.b\34102-08.D Injection Date: 11-Jan-2019 18:16:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-46969-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-46969-11 Client ID: 6279 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 7 Worklist Smp#: 8 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 93 sec-Butylbenzene, CAS: 135-98-8 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 2749(17.65) m z 105.0 2: 2 2, 21ri 0 0 21 01: X X_ >- 1. 207" >- 1 1 v44 . 253' X209 6 73I 91\I I�105 147NI + I I I 17.6 Min I 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 FT 1 m/7 2: Enhanced Spec:Scan 2749(17.65),Qvalue=l m/z 134.0 2, Y 0 c 21 c X X 11207" >- 1 v44 253" X209 73NI 91\1 I'105 147NI ( 1 I 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 17.6 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 93 sec-Butylbenzene (NIST) m/z 91.0 105 2- I I 21 I 00 l: o X 6 ›- 1 91N 1340 G — — — ` ' I 61. Ii I. 17.6 Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 FT 1 RT Mass Response Amount 17.65 105.00 208 0.000576 17.66 134.00 0 17.66 91.00 0 Reviewer: puangmaleek, 14-Jan-2019 13:00:13 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 76 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Jan-2019 13:00:47 Chrom Revision: 2.3 13-Dec-2018 17:23:12 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190111-34102.b\34102-08.D Injection Date: 11-Jan-2019 18:16:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-46969-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-46969-11 Client ID: 6279 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 7 Worklist Smp#: 8 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 ., Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 94 4-Isopropyltoluene, CAS: 99-87-6 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 2779(17.81) m/z 119.0 31 2 W 0 2 _0 21 X 21 X 1 >- >- 1 207' 11 11 744 253iI i 731 96N1 1191 191NI 2321 17.7 i Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 FT i m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 2779(17.81),Qvalue=1 m/z 134.0 3, E 0 2 • c 21 X } } 1 207" 11 744 2530 73''l 96) 1191 191) 2321 i 1 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 17.7 m/7 Min 1 Ref Spec: 94 4-Isopropyltoluene (NIST) m/z 91.0 119 31 I 1 o - 21 1 o X 1: X } 1 X134 I - 91'' L. J..r„ Al17"..�_. _L..-_ i.1,1. _ ,. 17.7 i Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 €2T I RT Mass Response Amount 17.81 119.00 226 0.000737 17.81 134.00 0 17.81 91.00 0 Reviewer: puangmaleek, 14-Jan-2019 13:00:14 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 77 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Jan-2019 13:00:47 Chrom Revision: 2.3 13-Dec-2018 17:23:12 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\201 901 1 1-341 02.b\34102-08.D Injection Date: 11-Jan-2019 18:16:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-46969-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-46969-11 Client ID: 6279 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 7 Worklist Smp#: 8 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 4.7- ,-- Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 97 Benzyl chloride, CAS: 100-44-7 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 2843(18.15) m/z 91.0 31 31 2 0 2 0 X21 X 21 >- y. 1 1 207N 11 11 '44 3 73\1 91\1 11511 191N1 1/208 253N1 I 1 i 8.1 Min 1 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 FT I m17 'A' Enhanced Spec:Scan 2843(18.15),Qvalue=12' m/z 126.0 31 21 mow 0 2 _0 18 21 X 1 >- >- 1 207N 11 '44 ' \ ` 731 91) 11511 191Ni 1'208 253 I I 18.1 Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 FT i m/7 11 Ref Spec: 97 Benzyl chloride (NIST) m'z 65.0 91 a • E o c Q = X X >- • 126N Ni . ,L 65 Il ._39N1��92 I'128 i 1 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 18.1 Min RT Mass Response Amount 18.15 91.00 173 0.000817 18.15 126.00 0 18.15 65.00 0 Reviewer: puangmaleek, 14-Jan-2019 13:00:31 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 78 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Jan-2019 13:00:47 Chrom Revision: 2.3 13-Dec-2018 17:23:12 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\201 901 1 1-341 02.b\34102-08.D Injection Date: 11-Jan-2019 18:16:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-46969-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-46969-11 Client ID: 6279 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 7 Worklist Smp#: 8 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 ( 0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 99 n-Butylbenzene, CAS: 104-51-8 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 2849(18.18) m/z 91.0 2: 2 0 2' 21 0 21 X 1 } 14 207N } 11 1 '44 73\II 96� I 135NI 191'I I208 253NJ 18.2 Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 PT m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 2849(18.18),Qvalue=1 m/z 134.0 2: 2• .E o c X 28 } 1: 207N } 1 X44 73) I 96j I 135�I 1911 Iv208 253N1 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 18.2 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 99 n-Butylbenzene (NIST) m/z 92.0 91 ' c o c X92 X >- 134N 65 X105 1 .r, d... _..I.- ...16- _ r �,�. - - 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 18.2 Min RT Mass Response Amount 18.18 91.00 248 0.000894 18.32 134.00 0 18.32 92.00 0 Reviewer: puangmaleek, 14-Jan-2019 13:00:36 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 79 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Jan-2019 13:00:47 Chrom Revision: 2.3 13-Dec-2018 17:23:12 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\201 901 1 1-341 02.b\34102-08.D Injection Date: 11-Jan-2019 18:16:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-46969-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-46969-11 Client ID: 6279 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 7 Worklist Smp#: 8 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15LLNJTO3 Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 ( 0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 100 1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene, CAS: 95-50-1 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 2908(18.50) m/z 14..0 31 31 � 0 2 2 0 0 21 x 21 >- >x 1 1 207 11 11 i 44 73Ni " 1 146NIIi148 1177 11'208 253NI I 18.3 18.6 i Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 FT i m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 2908(18.50),Qvalue=1 m/z 111.0 3, _T 0 2 c 10 ._ C4 X21 X >- >- 1 207N 11 4473Ni 96"1 146"IIi148 1'177 II 208 253"' 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 18.3 18.6 m/7 min 11 Ref Spec: 100 1,2-Dichlorobenzene (NIST) m/z 14:.0 146 2 '4 . 21 0 0 o 148 x_ 1 X >- �- 11 • 111 75 i I'113 i. L150 18.3 18.6 .II1. 3l )i i Y- Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 FT I RT Mass Response Amount 18.50 146.00 597 0.003447 18.48 111.00 0 18.50 148.00 162 Reviewer: puangmaleek, 14-Jan-2019 13:00:39 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 80 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Jan-2019 13:00:47 Chrom Revision: 2.3 13-Dec-2018 17:23:12 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\201 901 1 1-341 02.b\34102-08.D Injection Date: 11-Jan-2019 18:16:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-46969-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-46969-11 Client ID: 6279 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 7 Worklist Smp#: 8 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 103 1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene, CAS: 120-82-1 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 3348(20.85) m/z 180.0 2. 3: 0 21 207" 31 ; o_ 0 2. X11 X ! 1 >- >- 1: 1 1 • __44 i • 73Ni 96'1 133' l 180 11 I II 208 26pr1 20.6 20.9 Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 FT 1 m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3348(20.85),Qvalue=1 m/z 182.0 2' 31 0 21 207N 2 0 0 Ell X 1� X 21 >_ >--_- 1 1 11 • X44 73) 96N1 133) 180NII I h 208 26n�1 20.6 20.9 I Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 FT 1 m/7 11 Ref Spec: 103 1,2,4-Trichlorobenz ne (NIST) 180 \182 0 0 _o X 145N '184 109" '147 74N I �.,.11. � n. .4I�_ 1X73._ _L._ _.._ J1(7.5.W_ .._ _a I.I. 146 1. i 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 RT Mass Response Amount 20.85 180.00 1024 0.008002 20.85 182.00 525 Reviewer: puangmaleek, 14-Jan-2019 13:00:40 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 81 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Jan-2019 13:00:47 Chrom Revision: 2.3 13-Dec-2018 17:23:12 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190111-34102.b\34102-08.D Injection Date: 11-Jan-2019 18:16:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-46969-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-46969-11 Client ID: 6279 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 7 Worklist Smp#: 8 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 105 Naphthalene, CAS: 91-20-3 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 3444(21.36) 4 m/z 128.0 2 207 3 0 25 0 2: x 1: ‘>—< 21 >- >- 1 1, -44 128( 96' 73 I I 193 ,1 1'208 I 260) 21.1 21.4 Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3444(21.36),Qvalue=1 2 207 20 1: > 1 744 73) 96" 128 I 193 ,1 17208 I 2601 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 m17 _ 1i Ref Spec: 105 Naphthalene (NIST) 128 o 0 _o X 127 "129 I_ .r6th 102 I. III. 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 RT Mass Response Amount 21.36 128.00 810 0.002987 Reviewer: puangmaleek, 14-Jan-2019 12:52:52 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 82 of 407 3/7/2019 FORM I AIR - GC/MS VOA ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: TestAmerica Burlington Job No. : 200-47318-1 SDG No. : Client Sample ID: 6294 Lab Sample ID: 200-47318-12 t Matrix: Air Lab File ID: 34522-24.D Analysis Method: TO-15 Date Collected: 02/07/2019 00:00 Sample wt/vol: 200 (mL) Date Analyzed: 02/12/2019 06:54 Soil Aliquot Vol: Dilution Factor: 1 Soil Extract Vol. : GC Column: RTX-624 ID: 0.32 (mm) % Moisture: Level: (low/med) Low Analysis Batch No. : 139868 Units: ppb v/v CAS NO. COMPOUND NAME RESULT Q RL RL 115-07-1 Propylene 5.0 U ^ 5.0 5.0 75-71-8 Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-45-6 Freon 22 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 76-14-2 1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 74-87-3 Chloromethane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 106-97-8 n-Butane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-01-4 Vinyl chloride 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 106-99-0 1,3-Butadiene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20ED 74-83-9 Bromomethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-00-3 Chloroethane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 593-60-2 Bromoethene(Vinyl Bromide) 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-69-4 Trichlorofluoromethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 64-17-5 Ethanol 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 76-13-1 Freon TF 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-35-4 1,1-Dichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 67-64-1 Acetone 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 67-63-0 Isopropyl alcohol 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 75-15-0 Carbon disulfide 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 107-05-1 3-Chloropropene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-09-2 Methylene Chloride 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-65-0 tert-Butyl alcohol 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 1634-04-4 Methyl tert-butyl ether 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 156-60-5 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 110-54-3 n-Hexane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-34-3 1,1-Dichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-05-4 Vinyl acetate 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 141-78-6 Ethyl acetate 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 78-93-3 Methyl Ethyl Ketone 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 156-59-2 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 540-59-0 1,2-Dichloroethene, Total 0.40 U 0.40 0.40 67-66-3 Chloroform 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 109-99-9 Tetrahydrofuran 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 71-55-6 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 110-82-7 Cyclohexane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 56-23-5 Carbon tetrachloride 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 540-84-1 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 FORM I TO-15 Page 83 of 407 3/7/2019 FORM I AIR - GC/MS VOA ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: TestAmerica Burlington Job No. : 200-47318-1 SDG No. : Client Sample ID: 6294 Lab Sample ID: 200-47318-12 'd-1 Matrix: Air Lab File ID: 34522-24.D Analysis Method: TO-15 Date Collected: 02/07/2019 00:00 ff. Sample wt/vol: 200 (mL) Date Analyzed: 02/12/2019 06:54 Soil Aliquot Vol: Dilution Factor: 1 Soil Extract Vol. : GC Column: RTX-624 ID: 0.32 (mm) % Moisture: Level: (low/med) Low Analysis Batch No. : 139868 Units: ppb v/v CAS NO. COMPOUND NAME RESULT Q RL RL 71-43-2 Benzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 107-06-2 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 142-82-5 n-Heptane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 79-01-6 Trichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 f 80-62-6 Methyl methacrylate 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 78-87-5 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 123-91-1 1,4-Dioxane 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 MOMM 75-27-4 Bromodichloromethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 10061-01-5 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-10-1 methyl isobutyl ketone 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 108-88-3 Toluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 10061-02-6 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 79-00-5 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 127-18-4 Tetrachloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 591-78-6 Methyl Butyl Ketone (2-Hexanone) 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 124-48-1 Dibromochloromethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 106-93-4 1,2-Dibromoethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-90-7 Chlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 100-41-4 Ethylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 179601-23-1 m,p-Xylene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 95-47-6 Xylene, o- 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 1330-20-7 Xylene (total) 0.70 U 0.70 0.70 100-42-5 Styrene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-25-2 Bromoform 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 98-82-8 Cumene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 79-34-5 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 103-65-1 n-Propylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 622-96-8 4-Ethyltoluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-67-8 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 95-49-8 2-Chlorotoluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 98-06-6 tert-Butylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 95-63-6 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 135-98-8 sec-Butylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 99-87-6 4-Isopropyltoluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 541-73-1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 106-46-7 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 FORM I TO-15 Page 84 of 407 3/7/2019 FORM I AIR - GC/MS VOA ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: TestAmerica Burlington Job No. : 200-47318-1 SDG No. : Client Sample ID: 6294 Lab Sample ID: 200-47318-12 4:41 Matrix: Air Lab File ID: 34522-24.D Analysis Method: TO-15 Date Collected: 02/07/2019 00:00 Sample wt/vol: 200 (mL) Date Analyzed: 02/12/2019 06:54 Soil Aliquot Vol: Dilution Factor: 1 Soil Extract Vol. : GC Column: RTX-624 ID: 0.32 (mm) Moisture: Level: (low/med) Low Analysis Batch No. : 139868 Units: ppb v/v CAS NO. COMPOUND NAME RESULT Q RL RL 100-44-7 Benzyl chloride 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 104-51-8 n-Butylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 95-50-1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 .P 120-82-1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 87-68-3 Hexachlorobutadiene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 91-20-3 Naphthalene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 III FORM I TO-15 Page 85 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 09:28:13 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 TestAmerica Burlington Target Compound Quantitation Report Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHC.i\20190211-34522.b\34522-24.D Lims ID: 200-47318-A-12 Client ID: 6294 Sample Type: Client Inject. Date: 12-Feb-2019 06:54:30 ALS Bottle#: 24 Worklist Smp#: 24 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Sample Info: 200-0034522-024 Operator ID: ert Instrument ID: CHC.i Method: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHC.i\20190211-34522.b\TO15MasterMethod_(v1)_CHC.i.m Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Last Update: 13-Feb-2019 09:28:12 Calib Date: 06-Feb-2019 00:53:30 Integrator: RTE ID Type: Deconvolution ID Quant Method: Internal Standard Quant By: Initial Calibration Last !Cal File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHC.i\20190205-34442.b\34442-11.D Column 1 : RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Det: MS SCAN Process Host: CTX0306 First Level Reviewer: puangmaleek Date: 13-Feb-2019 09:28:12 RT Adj RT Dlt RT OnCol Amt Compound Sig (min.) (min.) (min.) Q Response ppb v/v Flags 1 Propene 41 2.962 ND U 2 Dichlorodifluoromethane 85 3.026 ND 3 Chlorodifluoromethane 51 3.074 ND U 4 1,2-Dichloro-1,1,2,2-tetra 85 3.288 ND 5 Chloromethane 50 3.410 ND 1 6 Butane 43 3.613 ND 7 Vinyl chloride 62 3.650 ND 8 Butadiene 54 3.725 ND 10 Bromomethane 94 4.387 ND 11 Chloroethane 64 4.622 ND 13 Vinyl bromide 106 5.011 ND 14 Trichlorofluoromethane 101 5.123 ND 17 Ethanol 45 5.695 ND U 20 1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trif 101 6.207 ND 21 1,1-Dichloroethene 96 6.234 ND 22 Acetone 43 6.447 ND 23 Carbon disulfide 76 6.612 ND 24 Isopropyl alcohol 45 6.773 ND 25 3-Chloro-1-propene 41 7.018 ND 27 Methylene Chloride 49 7.312 ND 28 2-Methyl-2-propanol 59 7.546 ND 29 Methyl tert-butyl ether 73 7.728 ND 31 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 61 7.765 ND 33 Hexane 57 8.171 ND 34 1,1-Dichloroethane 63 8.624 ND 35 Vinyl acetate 43 8.715 ND 37 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 96 9.740 ND 38 2-Butanone (MEK) 72 9.777 ND 39 Ethyl acetate 88 9.841 ND * 40 Chlorobromomethane 128 10.199 10.199 0.000 78 482046 10.0 S 30 1,2-Dichloroethene, Total 61 10.200 ND 41 Tetrahydrofuran 42 10.210 ND Page 86 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 09:28:13 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHC.i\20190211-34522.b\34522-24.D RT Adj RT Dlt RT OnCol Amt Compound Sig (min.) (min.) (min.) Q Response ppb v/v Flags 42 Chloroform 83 10.343 ND 43 Cyclohexane 84 10.599 ND 44 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 97 10.615 ND 45 Carbon tetrachloride 117 10.871 ND 47 Benzene 78 11.325 ND U 46 Isooctane 57 11.330 ND 48 1,2-Dichloroethane 62 11.501 ND 49 n-Heptane 43 11.736 ND * 501,4-Difluorobenzene 114 12.184 12.184 0.000 93 2884886 10.0 53 Trichloroethene 95 12.654 ND 54 1,2-Dichloropropane 63 13.188 ND 55 Methyl methacrylate 69 13.385 ND 56 1,4-Dioxane 88 13.422 ND 57 Dibromomethane 174 13.454 ND 58 Dichlorobromomethane 83 13.769 ND 60 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 75 14.719 ND 61 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK 43 14.997 ND 65 Toluene 92 15.312 ND 66 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 75 15.915 ND U 67 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 83 16.283 ND 68 Tetrachloroethene 166 16.416 ND 69 2-Hexanone 43 16.737 ND 71 Chlorodibromomethane 129 17.051 ND 72 Ethylene Dibromide 107 17.308 ND El 0* 74 Chlorobenzene-d5 117 18.215 18.215 0.000 84 3056916 10.0 75 Chlorobenzene 112 18.279 ND 76 Ethylbenzene 91 18.439 ND U 78 m-Xylene& p-Xylene 106 18.690 ND 79 o-Xylene 106 19.522 ND 80 Styrene 104 19.576 ND 81 Bromoform 173 20.008 ND S 73 Xylenes, Total 106 20.100 ND 82 lsopropylbenzene 105 20.238 ND 84 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 83 20.910 ND 85 N-Propylbenzene 91 20.985 ND 88 4-Ethyltoluene 105 21.177 ND 89 2-Chlorotoluene 91 21.182 ND 90 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 105 21.289 ND 92 tert-Butylbenzene 119 21.791 ND 93 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 105 21.887 ND U 94 sec-Butylbenzene 105 22.122 ND U 95 4-Isopropyltoluene 119 22.330 ND 96 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 146 22.351 ND U 97 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 146 22.490 ND U 98 Benzyl chloride 91 22.677 ND U 100 n-Butylbenzene 91 22.895 ND U 101 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 146 23.007 ND U 103 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 180 25.409 ND 104 Hexachlorobutadiene 225 25.601 ND 105 Naphthalene 128 25.852 ND U Page 87 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 09:28:13 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 QC Flag Legend Review Flags U - Marked Undetected Reagents: ATTO15CISs 00010 Amount Added: 20.00 Units: mL Run Reagent 1 Page 88 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 09:28:13 Chrom Revision:2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 it=.' TestAmerica Burlington .,: Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHC.i\20190211-34522.b\34522-24.D Injection Date: 12-Feb-2019 06:54:30 Instrument ID: CHC.i Operator ID: ert Lims ID: 200-47318-A-12 Lab Sample ID: 200-47318-12 Worklist Smp#: 24 Client ID: 6294 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil.Factor: 1.0000 ALS Bottle#: 24 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_(v1)_CHC.i Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column:RTX-624(0.32 mm) Y Scaling:Method Defined:Set to Absolute Y Value 34522-24[MS SCAN Chro]:Total 1: rn r` N (NI cd : Q-1 N 2 O N � 1 0 2 O 1 o U 0 E 2 1 2 `o 1 v 0 1 0 0 0 0 1I X >- El I ` A._ 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 26.0 28.0 30.0 Min Page 89 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 09:28:13 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHC.i\20190211-34522.b\34522-24.D Injection Date: 12-Feb-2019 06:54:30 Instrument ID: CHC.i Lims ID: 200-47318-A-12 Lab Sample ID: 200-47318-12 Client ID: 6294 Operator ID: ert ALS Bottle#: 24 Worklist Smp#: 24 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod (v1)_CHC.i Limit Group: AlTO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 1 Propene, CAS: 115-07-1 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 17(2.97) m/z 41.0 44 42- is I 35' ccli o 0 28- } t 207N >- 21- J 40N 14 78N 91 ( 0 I � i 2.8 3.1 ` Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 FT I m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 17(2.97),Qvalue=11 m/z 42.0 11 44 21 0 1• I I o o mix x 207N } 1 >- • 40•_ 78N 911 — – 2.8 3.1 ` Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 FT I m/7 11 i Ref Spec: 1 Propene (NIST) m/z 139.0 41 4 o 3 I _ CD o X42 ET 2: X I x 21 //\ / H i _ _, I .d . ` 2.8 3.1 i Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 FT I m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 2.97 41.00 775 0.037394 2.96 42.00 0 2.96 39.00 0 Reviewer: puangmaleek, 13-Feb-2019 09:26:32 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 90 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 09:28:13 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHC.i\20190211-34522.b\34522-24.D Injection Date: 12-Feb-2019 06:54:30 Instrument ID: CHC.i Lims ID: 200-47318-A-12 Lab Sample ID: 200-47318-12 Client ID: 6294 Operator ID: ert ALS Bottle#: 24 Worklist Smp#: 24 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod (v1)_CHC.i Limit Group: Al_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 3 Chlorodifluoromethane, CAS: 75-45-6 Processing Results 7 Raw Spec:Scan 46(3.13) 2 m/z 51.0 44 6 21 r 5 c6 0 0 1: 4 41;) x 1 > 3: >- 2 2 78 ' 207N • 1: X51 i 3.0 Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 �2T m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 46(3.13),Qvalue=1 m/z 67.0 7 i 44 6 0 5, x 4 40N X 3: >- 2 78" 207N 1: 1'51 � I I 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 3.0 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 3 Chlorodifluoromethane (NIST) m/z 69.0 51 T O C O - C X X > • >- 67N1 67" LI. 50 L.I.._ .I.1 i i I 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 3.0 m/7 Min RT Mass Response Amount 3.13 51.00 100 0.002364 3.07 67.00 0 3.07 69.00 0 Reviewer: puangmaleek, 13-Feb-2019 09:26:34 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 91 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 09:28:13 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHC.i\20190211-34522.b\34522-24.D Injection Date: 12-Feb-2019 06:54:30 Instrument ID: CHC.i Lims ID: 200-47318-A-12 Lab Sample ID: 200-47318-12 Client ID: 6294 Operator ID: ert ALS Bottle#: 24 Worklist Smp#: 24 g Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 &, Method: TO15_MasterMethod_(v1) CHC.i Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 17 Ethanol, CAS: 64-17-5 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 531(5.72) m/z 45.0 2, 2: 207 r 21 `n 2, 0 0 1: 21 ><- 1 >- 11 >- 1 • 5.6 Min G 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 FT I m17 Enhanced Spec:Scan 531(5.72),Qvalue=l m/z 46.0 i 2: 207 2. c O C 7 X 21 X >- 11 >- 1 1 ii i 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 5.6 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 17 Ethanol (NIST) 0 0 0 X >- X46 G 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 5.72 45.00 111 0.015208 5.69 46.00 0 Reviewer: puangmaleek, 13-Feb-2019 09:26:39 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 92 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 09:28:13 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHC.i\20190211-34522.b\34522-24.D Injection Date: 12-Feb-2019 06:54:30 Instrument ID: CHC.i Lims ID: 200-47318-A-12 Lab Sample ID: 200-47318-12 Client ID: 6294 Operator ID: ert ALS Bottle#: 24 Worklist Smp#: 24 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod (v1)_CHC.i Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 47 Benzene, CAS: 71-43-2 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 1580(11.31) m/z 78.0 2' 78 2' v i 21 207 21 o _0 1Q X 1i X > 1 >-, 1 i 11.2 11.5 1 Min 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 FT m17 Enhanced Spec:Scan 1580(11.31),Qvalue=1 1 m/z 77.0 2' 78 i I I 207 1 21 x , El 1: x 1 > 1 > • i 11.2 11.5 i Min 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 FT i m17 11 i Ref Spec: 47 Benzene (DATA) 78 0 0 o T< > • .I,I r51 i 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 11.31 78.00 346 0.003344 11.32 77.00 0 Reviewer: puangmaleek, 13-Feb-2019 09:27:04 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 93 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 09:28:13 Chrom Revision:2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHC.i\20190211-34522.b\34522-24.D Injection Date: 12-Feb-2019 06:54:30 Instrument ID: CHC.i Lims ID: 200-47318-A-12 Lab Sample ID: 200-47318-12 Client ID: 6294 Operator ID: ert ALS Bottle#: 24 Worklist Smp#: 24 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_(v1)_CHC.i Limit Group: Al_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 66 trans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene, CAS: 10061-02-6 Processing Results 1 Raw Spec:Scan 2444(15.93) / m/z 75.0 207 11 0 11 0 0 + 0 0 Lo X X L N m } '208 Al 1 96 191 15.8 li 1331. I �., I. ` Min 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 iitT i m/7 1 Enhanced Spec:Scan 2444(15.93),Qvalue=1 m/z 110.0 207 _ 0 11 o c o c X X >- } '208 96 191 li 1331. i I,, ,. 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 15.8 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 66 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene (NIST) 0 0 _o X >- 39 77• 110 i _Li. ,!37 11./38 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 m/ RT Mass Response Amount 15.93 75.00 283 0.004280 15.91 110.00 0 Reviewer: puangmaleek, 13-Feb-2019 09:27:14 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 94 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 09:28:13 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHC.i\20190211-34522.b\34522-24.D Injection Date: 12-Feb-2019 06:54:30 Instrument ID: CHC.i Urns ID: 200-47318-A-12 Lab Sample ID: 200-47318-12 Client ID: 6294 Operator ID: ert ALS Bottle#: 24 Worklist Smp#: 24 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_(v1)_CHC.i Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 76 Ethylbenzene, CAS: 100-41-4 Processing Results 1 Ra�Spec:Scan 2874(18.22) o m/z 91.0 117 21 N 011 0 0 1' _o 0 '>-‹ } 82" >- • '119 • 5411 18.1 18A 18.7 116 4 Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 RT m/7 Amdis Enhanced Spec:Scan 2874(18.22),Qvalue=46 m/z 106.0 91 116 1 7: • o _7 1 6 X118 X } 5 81N >- 3'3' 2: 1 53N 1 ,I� � J�87t i 18.1 18.4 18.7 i Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 RT I m/7 1 Ref Spec: 76 Ethylbenzene (NIST) 91 X } 1106 51NJ 1611I 111. I 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 mh RT Mass Response Amount 18.22 91.00 5862 0.028577 18.44 106.00 0 Reviewer: puangmaleek, 13-Feb-2019 09:27:28 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 95 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 09:28:13 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHC.i\20190211-34522.b\34522-24.D Injection Date: 12-Feb-2019 06:54:30 Instrument ID: CHC.i Lims ID: 200-47318-A-12 Lab Sample ID: 200-47318-12 Client ID: 6294 Operator ID: ert ALS Bottle#: 24 Worklist Smp#: 24 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_(v1)_CHC.i Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 ( 0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 93 1 ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene, CAS: 95-63-6 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 3586(22.02) 1 m/z 105.0 21 207 1 0 1: 0 1 X 1 } 1 } ` 253N �ii 133 191 1208 73 !III 1 96 I I I I II/1r I Ii III 172321 I� 21.8 Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 �T m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3586(22.02),Qvalue=1 m/z 120.0 21 207 O 1• � c X 1 X >- 1 } 253N 133 191 1208 73 I I II 1961 I I I I I 115 I I� III 2321 II 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 21.8 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 931,2,4-Trimethylbenzene (NIST) 105 CD _ X } '120 77N ,.la. -,L �l 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 22.02 105.00 225 0.001150 21.89 120.00 0 Reviewer: puangmaleek, 13-Feb-2019 09:27:44 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 96 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 09:28:13 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHC.i\20190211-34522.b\34522-24.D Injection Date: 12-Feb-2019 06:54:30 Instrument ID: CHC.i Lims ID: 200-47318-A-12 Lab Sample ID: 200-47318-12 Client ID: 6294 Operator ID: ert ALS Bottle#: 24 Worklist Smp#: 24 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_(v1)_CHC.i Limit Group: AITO15 'CAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 94 sec-Butylbenzene, CAS: 135-98-8 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 3613(22.16) m/z 105.0 2, 207 18- I iM 15- I 021 0 0 12- x 1• x 9 >- >- 1 I} • 253N • 73 96' 133,E X147 191N ` 208 0' — i i I \III I I I I II �+ �I I I�I ISI 1 I I I� I I 22.0 i Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 PT i m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3613(22.16),Qvalue=1 m/z 134.0 2, 207 1' T 1 c� 0 21 `� • _o _0 1MI X 1• X c } } 1 • 253N • 73 96N 133�N '147 191N `x208 6 — ` I III I I I I II �+ �I 1 Iii III I I I I I 1 22.0 Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 FT m/7 11 Ref Spec: 94 sec-Butylbenzene (NIST) m/z 91.0 105 3• o 31 0 CD a \/\- ) ›- • >- 1• 1 91N134N ,. i,� I. ..L• . 22.0 -� Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 FT I m17 RT Mass Response Amount 22.16 105.00 157 0.000551 22.16 134.00 99 22.12 91.00 0 Reviewer: puangmaleek, 13-Feb-2019 09:27:46 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 97 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 09:28:13 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHC.i\20190211-34522.b\34522-24.D Injection Date: 12-Feb-2019 06:54:30 Instrument ID: CHC.i Lims ID: 200-47318-A-12 Lab Sample ID: 200-47318-12 Client ID: 6294 Operator ID: ert ALS Bottle#: 24 Worklist Smp#: 24 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_(v1)_CHC.i Limit Group: AI_TO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 96 1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene, CAS: 541-73-1 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 3650(22.36) m/z 146.0 2: 207 2 . 0 2, 21 o _o X 21 X 1 } 11 >- 11 1 73 '208 253" 1 I I I 96I 1 133 II/1 III I 177\1 III ll I 11 II 22 .2 22.5 ` Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 V21- 1 m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3650(22.36),Qvalue=1 m/z 111.0 i 2: 207 T 0 2, C sr. ",. O X 21 X >- 11 >- 1 73"' '208 253" �I 133 I h II • I I 961 1 I II/1 Ih5 I 177\1 Iii II I I i 1 1 I 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 22.2 22.5 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 96 1,3-Dichlorobenzene (NIST) m/z 148.0 146 1 o 1 0 0 0 x_ 148 x_ } } 111" c 75" l73" J � 113 1150 22.2 22.5 ..I-1. .,., , I. II... __ i1 .. Ii. Min i 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 CST I m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 22.36 146.00 180 0.001268 22.35 111.00 0 22.35 148.00 0 Reviewer: puangmaleek, 13-Feb-2019 09:27:48 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 98 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 09:28:13 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHC.i\20190211-34522.b\34522-24.D Injection Date: 12-Feb-2019 06:54:30 Instrument ID: CHC.i Lims ID: 200-47318-A-12 Lab Sample ID: 200-47318-12 Client ID: 6294 Operator ID: ert ALS Bottle#: 24 Worklist Smp#: 24 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15MasterMethod_(v1)_CHC.i Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 97 1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene, CAS: 106-46-7 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 3650(22.36) m/z 146.0 2: 207 2 0 2, 21 ( I o _0 11 I X 21 X >- 1: } 1 1 73" '208 253" ` I I I 96 1 I 9/1 III5 I 177\I III I I 11 1 22.4 Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 FT I m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3650(22.36),Qvalue=1 m/z 111.0 2: 207 _>. 02, c X 0 21 X B3 >- 11 >- 1 1 73" '208 253N1 li. I I I 96I 1 1133 III71IIII II 177`I III tl I 1 Ii 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 22.4 m!7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 97 1,4-Dichlorobenzene (NIST) m/z 148.0 146 4 I a 3 0 _o 0 2: X V148 X 21 >- >- I 1, 111" I I �,II L 75 I' '113 IV150 22.4 I, I. .. I.. Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 FT I mh RT Mass Response Amount 22.36 146.00 180 0.001247 22.49 111.00 0 22.49 148.00 0 Reviewer: puangmaleek, 13-Feb-2019 09:27:49 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 99 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 09:28:13 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHC.i\20190211-34522.b\34522-24.D Injection Date: 12-Feb-2019 06:54:30 Instrument ID: CHC.i Lims ID: 200-47318-A-12 Lab Sample ID: 200-47318-12 Client ID: 6294 Operator ID: ert ALS Bottle#: 24 Worklist Smp#: 24 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_(v1)_CHC.i Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 98 Benzyl chloride, CAS: 100-44-7 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 3708(22.67) m/z 91.0 4207 i7 41 `D 3: N N 0 31 0 3 X X 2 } 2, } 1: 1: 1 253N 73N 133 3 191 ` 208 1232 ` 44 I li 96I'I l i I /1115 1i hI�I 1 I h1, 1 22.6 Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 AZT i m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3708(22.67),Qvalue=1 m/z 126.0 4 207 31 I 3: 2 0 0 31 0 21 X X } 2, >- 1 1 1: 11 1 73N 133 3 191N 1208 232I 96 / I1I I I h 1 ` 22.6 i Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 FT 1 m/7 11 Ref Spec: 98 Benzyl chloride (NIST) m/z 65.0 91 o •E 0 o C X X >- >- • 126" ,L. . i.65.1j.89N L(92 1128 i 1 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 22.6 mh Min RT Mass Response Amount 22.67 91.00 371 0.002243 22.68 126.00 0 22.68 65.00 0 Reviewer: puangmaleek, 13-Feb-2019 09:27:50 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 100 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 09:28:13 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHC.i\20190211-34522.b\34522-24.D Injection Date: 12-Feb-2019 06:54:30 Instrument ID: CHC.i Lims ID: 200-47318-A-12 Lab Sample ID: 200-47318-12 Client ID: 6294 Operator ID: ert ALS Bottle#: 24 Worklist Smp#: 24 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_(v1)_CHC.i Limit Group: AlT015ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 100 n-Butylbenzene, CAS: 104-51-8 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 3749(22.89) m/z 91.0 o 4• 207 5, i 0 4 0 4 3 x 4: >- 2: >- 3 21 253' 2. 11 191 `'208 ` 1. Iii 73 I 1961 II a 1331 I��15 a II I�I ul Ili 1321 ii 22.8 Min i 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 FT 1 m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3749(22.89),Qvalue=1 m/z 134.0 Ln 4. 207 4 co 0 4 3 N X. EEI 3 X 2: >- 2: }21 21 1 1, '208 253N I 73 133 232 III 1961 II II I I I191ir1�5 nJ III a III I ii E I 22.8 Min G 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 FT I m/7 1 Ref Spec: 100 n-Butylbenzene (NIST) m/z 92.0 91 ES' ; c o - x : /92 X >- >- 134�I 65 � X105 L _. J..._J�._ _ii. .. _ ..L ... i 1 1 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 22.8 m/b Min RT Mass Response Amount 22.89 91.00 147 0.000683 22.90 134.00 344 22.90 92.00 0 Reviewer: puangmaleek, 13-Feb-2019 09:27:52 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 101 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 09:28:13 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHC.i\20190211-34522.b\34522-24.D Injection Date: 12-Feb-2019 06:54:30 Instrument ID: CHC.i Lims ID: 200-47318-A-12 Lab Sample ID: 200-47318-12 Client ID: 6294 Operator ID: ert ALS Bottle#: 24 Worklist Smp#: 24 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod (v1)_CHC.i Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 101 1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene, CAS: 95-50-1 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 3770(23.00) m/z 146.0 5: i 31 0 207 5 _ 2 c\ 04 0 0 21 x 3 x 1 ,_--- 2: 11 I 21 1, i 73N11 961 I I 131\I(111i 1177 Iig1\lL I` 208 `� 531I.L L 22.9 Min i 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 FT I m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3770(23.00),Qvalue=1 m/z 111.0 5: i 207 4• >, 0 4 .E o IC X 3 X > 2: >- 21 21 1' 191N /208 253 73N96� 133N 1 II II I I 1 i 1+'1 3 li � 1 177\ Ii I1 i i L . dill. L i I I 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 22.9 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 101 1,2-Dichlorobenzene (NIST) m/z 148.0 146 3. O— 31 0 0 0 2• X , 148 X -- 1: >- >- 1 • 111' 75N i X113 v150 11. .73NI n..- I. _- III- 22.9 Min i 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 FT I m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 23.00 146.00 124 0.000893 23.01 111.00 0 23.01 148.00 0 Reviewer: puangmaleek, 13-Feb-2019 09:28:02 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 102 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 09:28:13 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHC.i\20190211-34522.b\34522-24.D Injection Date: 12-Feb-2019 06:54:30 Instrument ID: CHC.i Lims ID: 200-47318-A-12 Lab Sample ID: 200-47318-12 Client ID: 6294 Operator ID: ert ALS Bottle#: 24 Worklist Smp#: 24 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_(v1)_CHC.i Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624(0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 105 Naphthalene, CAS: 91-20-3 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 4309(25.88) 4 m/z 128.0 t: 6 207 a> 3 co 0 5 N o 4 o 2: X 21 >- 3: >- 2 1 1: \ '208 253 73' 96� 133 I 5 i 191 I i I llu ink I I I I h li 1 i1ill. II di ii 2\` I ,t `I L 25.8 Min i 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 FT I m17 Enhanced Spec:Scan 4309(25.88),Qvalue=1 6 207 0 5• ,. . • T 4 >- 3: 2 1: '208 253 133 '135 \ N 191 232 73 Iia 9i61 II 1 I 1 I II li i i d. II `II u, ` 1 II 111 L i 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 m17 1 Ref Spec: 105 Naphthalene (NIST) s 128 0 0 o _ X >- i 127' '129 J. A 6l 102 1 i 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 25.88 128.00 237 0.001083 Reviewer: puangmaleek, 13-Feb-2019 09:28:09 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 103 of 407 3/7/2019 } FORM I AIR - GC/MS VOA ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: TestAmerica Burlington Job No. : 200-47359-1 SDG No. : Client Sample ID: 5969 Lab Sample ID: 200-47359-11 ,,__ Matrix: Air Lab File ID: 200-34545-013.D "' Analysis Method: TO-15 Date Collected: 02/11/2019 00:00 Sample wt/vol: 200 (mL) Date Analyzed: 02/13/2019 02:26 Soil Aliquot Vol: Dilution Factor: 1 Soil Extract Vol. : GC Column: RTX-624 ID: 0.32 (mm) Moisture: Level: (low/med) Low Analysis Batch No. : 139912 Units: ppb v/v CAS NO. COMPOUND NAME RESULT Q RL RL 115-07-1 Propylene 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 75-71-8 Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-45-6 Freon 22 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 76-14-2 1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 74-87-3 Chloromethane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 106-97-8 n-Butane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-01-4 Vinyl chloride 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 mom 106-99-0 1,3-Butadiene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 74-83-9 Bromomethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-00-3 Chloroethane 0.50 U * 0.50 0.50 593-60-2 Bromoethene(Vinyl Bromide) 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-69-4 Trichlorofluoromethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 64-17-5 Ethanol 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 76-13-1 Freon TF 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-35-4 1,1-Dichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 67-64-1 Acetone 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 67-63-0 Isopropyl alcohol 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 75-15-0 Carbon disulfide 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 107-05-1 3-Chloropropene 0.50 U * 0.50 0.50 75-09-2 Methylene Chloride 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-65-0 tert-Butyl alcohol 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 1634-04-4 Methyl tert-butyl ether 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 156-60-5 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 110-54-3 n-Hexane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-34-3 1,1-Dichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-05-4 Vinyl acetate 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 141-78-6 Ethyl acetate 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 78-93-3 Methyl Ethyl Ketone 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 156-59-2 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 540-59-0 1,2-Dichloroethene, Total 0.40 U 0.40 0.40 67-66-3 Chloroform 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 109-99-9 Tetrahydrofuran 5.0 U * 5.0 5.0 71-55-6 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.20 U * 0.20 0.20 110-82-7 Cyclohexane 0.20 U * 0.20 0.20 56-23-5 Carbon tetrachloride 0.20 U * 0.20 0.20 540-84-1 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane 0.20 U * 0.20 0.20 FORM I TO-15 Page 104 of 407 3/7/2019 FORM I AIR - GC/MS VOA ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: TestAmerica Burlington Job No. : 200-47359-1 SDG No. : Client Sample ID: 5969 Lab Sample ID: 200-47359-11 g ,r Matrix: Air Lab File ID: 200-34545-013.D Analysis Method: TO-15 Date Collected: 02/11/2019 00:00 Sample wt/vol: 200 (mL) Date Analyzed: 02/13/2019 02:26 Soil Aliquot Vol: Dilution Factor: 1 Soil Extract Vol. : GC Column: RTX-624 ID: 0.32 (mm) Moisture: Level: (low/med) Low Analysis Batch No. : 139912 Units: ppb v/v CAS NO. COMPOUND NAME RESULT Q RL RL 71-43-2 Benzene 0.20 U * 0.20 0.20 107-06-2 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.20 U * 0.20 0.20 142-82-5 n-Heptane 0.20 U * 0.20 0.20 d" 79-01-6 Trichloroethene 0.20 U * 0.20 0.20 80-62-6 Methyl methacrylate 0.50 U * 0.50 0.50 78-87-5 1,2-Dichioropropane 0.20 U * 0.20 0.20 123-91-1 1,4-Dioxane 5.0 U * 5.0 5.0 • 75-27-4 Bromodichloromethane 0.20 U * 0.20 0.20El 10061-01-5 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.20 U * 0.20 0.20 108-10-1 methyl isobutyl ketone 0.50 U * 0.50 0.50 108-88-3 Toluene 0.20 U * 0.20 0.20 10061-02-6 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.20 U * 0.20 0.20 79-00-5 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.20 U * 0.20 0.20 127-18-4 Tetrachloroethene 0.20 U * 0.20 0.20 591-78-6 Methyl Butyl Ketone (2-Hexanone) 0.50 U * 0.50 0.50 124-48-1 Dibromochloromethane 0.20 U * 0.20 0.20 106-93-4 1,2-Dibromoethane 0.20 U * 0.20 0.20 108-90-7 Chlorobenzene 0.20 U * 0.20 0.20 100-41-4 Ethylbenzene 0.20 U * 0.20 0.20 179601-23-1 m,p-Xylene 0.50 U * 0.50 0.50 95-47-6 Xylene, o- 0.20 U * 0.20 0.20 1330-20-7 Xylene (total) 0.70 U * 0.70 0.70 100-42-5 Styrene 0.20 U * 0.20 0.20 75-25-2 Bromoform 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 98-82-8 Cumene 0.20 U * 0.20 0.20 79-34-5 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.20 U * 0.20 0.20 103-65-1 n-Propylbenzene 0.20 U * 0.20 0.20 622-96-8 4-Ethyltoluene 0.20 U * 0.20 0.20 108-67-8 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.20 U * 0.20 0.20 95-49-8 2-Chlorotoluene 0.20 U * 0.20 0.20 98-06-6 tert-Butylbenzene 0.20 U * 0.20 0.20 95-63-6 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.20 U * 0.20 0.20 135-98-8 sec-Butylbenzene 0.20 U * 0.20 0.20 99-87-6 4-Isopropyltoluene 0.20 U * 0.20 0.20 541-73-1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.20 U * 0.20 0.20 106-46-7 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.20 U * 0.20 0.20 FORM I TO-15 Page 105 of 407 3/7/2019 FORM I AIR - GC/MS VOA ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: TestAmerica Burlington Job No. : 200-47359-1 SDG No. : Client Sample ID: 5969 Lab Sample ID: 200-47359-11 '-'3 Matrix: Air Lab File ID: 200-34545-013.D Analysis Method: TO-15 Date Collected: 02/11/2019 00:00 Sample wt/vol: 200 (mL) Date Analyzed: 02/13/2019 02:26 Soil Aliquot Vol: Dilution Factor: 1 Soil Extract Vol. : GC Column: RTX-624 ID: 0.32 (mm) % Moisture: Level: (low/med) Low Analysis Batch No. : 139912 Units: ppb v/v CAS NO. COMPOUND NAME RESULT Q RL RL 100-44-7 Benzyl chloride 0.20 U * 0.20 0.20 104-51-8 n-Butylbenzene 0.20 U * 0.20 0.20 95-50-1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.20 U * 0.20 0.20 --,rxa•. 120-82-1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.50 U * 0.50 0.50 ' kkr 87-68-3 Hexachlorobutadiene 0.20 U * 0.20 0.20 91-20-3 Naphthalene 0.50 U * 0.50 0.50 WM FORM I TO-15 Page 106 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 15:37:36 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 TestAmerica Burlington Target Compound Quantitation Report Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHG.i\20190212-34545.b\200-34545-013.D Lims ID: 200-47359-A-11 Client ID: 5969 Sample Type: Client Inject. Date: 13-Feb-2019 02:26:30 ALS Bottle#: 12 Worklist Smp#: 13 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Sample Info: 200-0034545-013 Operator ID: ert Instrument ID: CHG.i Method: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHG.i\20190212-34545.b\TO15_MasterMethod_(v1)_G.m Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Last Update: 13-Feb-2019 15:37:36 Calib Date: 05-Feb-2019 12:16:30 Integrator: RTE ID Type: Deconvolution ID Quant Method: Internal Standard Quant By: Initial Calibration Last ICal File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHG.i\20190202-34412.b\200-34412-018.D Column 1 : RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Det: MS SCAN Process Host: CTX0307 First Level Reviewer: bunmaa Date: 13-Feb-2019 15:37:36 RT Adj RT Dlt RT OnCol Amt Compound Sig (min.) (min.) (min.) Q Response ppb v/v Flags 1 Propene 41 3.065 ND 2 Dichlorodifluoromethane 85 3.119 ND 3 Chlorodifluoromethane 51 3.151 ND U 0 4 1,2-Dichloro-1,1,2,2-tetra 85 3.311 NDEl 5 Chloromethane 50 3.424 ND U 6 Butane 43 3.568 ND U 7 Vinyl chloride 62 3.600 ND 8 Butadiene 54 3.654 ND 10 Bromomethane 94 4.162 ND 11 Chloroethane 64 4.333 ND 13 Vinyl bromide 106 4.633 ND 14 Trichlorofluoromethane 101 4.708 ND 17 Ethanol 45 5.130 ND 20 1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trif 101 5.542 ND 21 1,1-Dichloroethene 96 5.596 ND 22 Acetone 43 5.799 ND 23 Carbon disulfide 76 5.943 ND U 24 Isopropyl alcohol 45 6.008 ND 25 3-Chloro-1-propene 41 6.238 ND 27 Methylene Chloride 49 6.484 ND 28 2-Methyl-2-propanol 59 6.676 ND 29 Methyl tert-butyl ether 73 6.853 ND 31 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 61 6.874 ND 33 Hexane 57 7.217 ND 34 1,1-Dichloroethane 63 7.645 ND 35 Vinyl acetate 43 7.709 ND 37 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 96 8.650 ND U 38 2-Butanone (MEK) 72 8.699 ND 39 Ethyl acetate 88 8.741 ND 40 Chlorobromomethane 128 9.062 9.062 0.000 70 169668 10.0 41 Tetrahydrofuran 42 9.116 ND 42 Chloroform 83 9.185 ND Page 107 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 15:37:36 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHG.i\20190212-34545.b\200-34545-013.D RT Adj RT Dlt RT OnCol Amt Compound Sig (min.) (min.) (min.) Q Response ppb v/v Flags 43 Cyclohexane 84 9.448 ND 44 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 97 9.458 ND S 30 1,2-Dichloroethene, Total 61 9.665 ND 45 Carbon tetrachloride 117 9.699 ND 46 Isooctane 57 10.106 ND 47 Benzene 78 10.122 ND MUa 48 1,2-Dichloroethane 62 10.287 ND 49 n-Heptane 43 10.480 ND * 50 1,4-Difluorobenzene 114 10.919 10.919 0.000 92 922148 10.0 53 Trichloroethene 95 11.379 ND 54 1,2-Dichloropropane 63 11.924 ND 55 Methyl methacrylate 69 12.106 ND 57 Dibromomethane 174 12.171 ND MU 56 1,4-Dioxane 88 12.176 ND 58 Dichlorobromomethane 83 12.459 ND 60 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 75 13.385 ND 61 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK 43 13.684 ND 65 Toluene 92 13.957 ND 66trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 75 14.562 ND U 671,1,2-Trichloroethane 83 14.931 ND 68 Tetrachloroethene 166 15.027 15.027 -0.022 72 2099 0.0358 M 69 2-Hexanone 43 15.407 ND U 71 Chlorodibromomethane 129 15.691 ND 72 Ethylene Dibromide 107 15.947 ND * 74 Chlorobenzene-d5 117 16.857 16.862 -0.005 83 959846 10.04110 75 Chlorobenzene 112 16.921 ND U 76 Ethylbenzene 91 17.103 ND U 78 m-Xylene& p-Xylene 106 17.338 ND U 79 o-Xylene 106 18.194 ND 80 Styrene 104 18.253 ND 81 Bromoform 173 18.686 ND 82 lsopropylbenzene 105 18.954 ND S 73 Xylenes, Total 106 19.600 ND 84 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 83 19.681 ND U 85 N-Propylbenzene 91 19.778 ND U 88 4-Ethyltoluene 105 19.970 ND U 89 2-Chlorotoluene 91 19.976 ND U 90 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 105 20.093 ND U 92 tert-Butylbenzene 119 20.628 ND U 93 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 105 20.730 ND U 94 sec-Butylbenzene 105 20.976 ND U 95 4-Isopropyltoluene 119 21.190 ND U 96 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 146 21.201 ND U 97 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 146 21.351 ND U 98 Benzyl chloride 91 21.559 ND Ua 100 n-Butylbenzene 91 21.795 ND U 101 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 146 21.886 ND U 103 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 180 24.261 ND U 104 Hexachlorobutadiene 225 24.448 ND U 105 Naphthalene 128 24.689 ND U Page 108 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 15:37:36 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 QC Flag Legend Review Flags M - Manually Integrated U - Marked Undetected a- User Assigned ID Reagents: ATTO15GIS00015 Amount Added: 20.00 Units: mL Run Reagent r Page 109 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 15:37:36 Chrom Revision:2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 TestAmerica Burlington ` °' Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHG.i\20190212-34545.b\200-34545-013.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 02:26:30 Instrument ID: CHG.i Operator ID: ert Lims ID: 200-47359-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-47359-11 Worklist Smp#: 13 Client ID: 5969 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil.Factor: 1.0000 ALS Bottle#: 12 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_(v1)_G Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column:RTX-624(0.32 mm) Y Scaling:Method Defined:Scale to the Nth Largest Target:1 ;SI ' 1 200-34545-013[MS SCAN Chro]:Total 14- i co rri 13 -0 0 N N 12' N N 0 0 11- M m U _0 10- m c N N o g 0 0 O N p x8 O T O 4 >- V Ul C f, E MI g O 0 O O 5' U 4 2 I.t r 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 120 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 26.0 28.0 Min Page 110 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 15:37:36 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHG.i\20190212-34545.b\200-34545-013.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 02:26:30 Instrument ID: CHG.i Lims ID: 200-47359-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-47359-11 Client ID: 5969 Operator ID: ert ALS Bottle#: 12 Worklist Smp#: 13 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_(v1)_G Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 3 Chlorodifluoromethane, CAS: 75-45-6 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 41(3.15) 31 m/z 51.0 1 207 2 21 o >7.< 1 >- >- 11 78N 133N1 245N 3.1 Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 �T m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 41(3.15),Qvalue=1 m/z 67.0 1 207 6 11 C X X >- >- 78N 1 11 133NI 245NI 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 3.1 m/7 MI n 11 Ref Spec: 3 Chlorodifluoromethane (NIST) m/z 69.0 51 • � c X X >- • >- 67" I,i50 1I._ .I.I 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 3.1 m/7 Min RT Mass Response Amount 3.15 51.00 56 0.002348 3.15 67.00 0 3.15 69.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 13-Feb-2019 15:33:28 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 111 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 15:37:36 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHG.i\20190212-34545.b\200-34545-013.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 02:26:30 Instrument ID: CHG.i Lims ID: 200-47359-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-47359-11 Client ID: 5969 Operator ID: ert ALS Bottle#: 12 Worklist Smp#: 13 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_(v1)_G Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 5 Chloromethane, CAS: 74-87-3 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 91(3.42) m/z 50.0 71 1 M 0 61 207N 0 1 x 51 x >- 41 >- 31 r44 21 114N 129N 0140 181" 1�191 G — 11 3.3 ` Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 VT i m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 91(3.42),Qvalue=1 m/z 52.0 71 1 I 1 6 61 207N 8- '>R X 51 x >- 41 } 31 44 21I 114"1 129N I�140 181"" 1'191 i 11 3.3 ` Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 AZT i m/7 Ref Spec: 5 Chloromethane (NIST) 11 50 o 0 0 X >- X52 III i 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 3.42 50.00 103 0.009916 3.42 52.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 13-Feb-2019 15:33:31 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 112 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 15:37:37 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHG.i\20190212-34545.b\200-34545-013.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 02:26:30 Instrument ID: CHG.i Lims ID: 200-47359-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-47359-11 Client ID: 5969 Operator ID: ert ALS Bottle#: 12 Worklist Smp#: 13 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 :.< Method: TO15_MasterMethod_(v1)_G Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 6 Butane, CAS: 106-97-8 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 119(3.57) m/z 43.0 7 1, i• 6: 1 T< 5 207N X 1 >- 4, >- 3 X44 2 78\ 191 X208 242 — 11 II I I I I i 3.5 Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 FT i m17 Enhanced Spec:Scan 119(3.57),Qvalue=1 m/z 41.0 7 26 E 6: 1: `� T< 5 207 X 1 >- 4, 3 X44 278N 191 x208 242" — 11 ` I I I I I 3.5 Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 vT I m17 Ref Spec: 6 Butane (DATA) m/z 58.0 1: i 43 S' E0 c Xj< ; • } .11581 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 3.5 m/7 Min RT Mass Response Amount 3.57 43.00 55 0.003884 3.56 41.00 121 3.57 58.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 13-Feb-2019 15:33:34 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 113 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 15:37:37 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHG.i\20190212-34545.b\200-34545-013.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 02:26:30 Instrument ID: CHG.i Lims ID: 200-47359-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-47359-11 Client ID: 5969 Operator ID: ert ALS Bottle#: 12 Worklist Smp#: 13 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_(v1) G Limit Group: Al 1015 ICAL Column: RTX-624 ( 0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 23 Carbon disulfide, CAS: 75-15-0 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 564(5.95) m/z 76.0 4• 207 31 4 3 76N o 2, x x 1: 2: } 1 21 1, 5.8 i Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 RT { m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 564(5.95),Qvalue=13 4• 207 4 3 76" x >- 2: 21 1' 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 m/7 11 Ref Spec: 23 Carbon disulfide (NIST) 76 0 >- • I_. (78 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 5.95 76.00 413 0.011088 Reviewer: bunmaa, 13-Feb-2019 15:33:51 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 114 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 15:37:37 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHG.i\20190212-34545.b\200-34545-013.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 02:26:30 Instrument ID: CHG.i Lims ID: 200-47359-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-47359-11 Client ID: 5969 Operator ID: ert ALS Bottle#: 12 Worklist Smp#: 13 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 i Method: 1015 MasterMethod_(v1)_G Limit Group: AlTO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 37 cis-1 ,2-Dichloroethene, CAS: 156-59-2 Processing Results 2J Raw Spec:Scan 1028(8.43) m/z 96.0 21 191 96N 207 a _0 1i 68� •c c x1 x 1 >- >- i 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 8.6 = , m/7 Min 2 Enhanced Spec:Scan 1028(8.43),Qvalue=1 m/z 98.0 21 191 96N 207 0^ Ea 1 68N 'f x 1 x } 1 } i 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 8.6 m/7 Min 11 i Ref Spec: 37 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene (NIST) 61 0 0 0 T< 96N } 98 60, X63 11(48, I. _,, 1 100 i 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 8.43 96.00 61 0.004099 8.65 98.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 13-Feb-2019 15:34:04 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 115 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 15:37:37 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHG.i\20190212-34545.b\200-34545-013.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 02:26:30 Instrument ID: CHG.i Lims ID: 200-47359-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-47359-11 Client ID: 5969 Operator ID: ert ALS Bottle#: 12 Worklist Smp#: 13 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_(v1)_G Limit Group: AI_TO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 47 Benzene, CAS: 71-43-2 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 1346(10.13) m/z 78.0 4: i 78 4: 4 41 3: a 3 T< 31 x - 2, > 24Q\ >- 1: 1: 194N 1 i 10.0 ` Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 RT I m/7 4: Enhanced Spec:Scan 1346(10.13),Qvalue=l m/z 77.0 78 1 4 1 0 3: o X 31 X C > 2, 40N } L 1: 194' 1 G t 10.0 Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 vT I m/7 Ref Spec: 47 Benzene (NIST) 11 i 78 0 0 0 X >- • 77N 52 Ill. 5111I.'52 ..I 74\1,1 (79 G 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 mh RT Mass Response Amount 10.13 78.00 455 0.011278 10.12 77.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 13-Feb-2019 15:34:50 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 116 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 15:37:37 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHG.i\20190212-34545.b\200-34545-013.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 02:26:30 Instrument ID: CHG.i Lims ID: 200-47359-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-47359-11 Client ID: 5969 Operator ID: ert ALS Bottle#: 12 Worklist Smp#: 13 gip. Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_(v1) G Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 ( 0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 66 trans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene, CAS: 10061-02-6 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 2173(14.56) 2 m/z 750 207 1 21 v 0 a 1 a- 1: X X 1 } , r 40 ' 75 11 96)108) 191NI 14.5 Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 T m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 2173(14.56),Qvalue=1 m/z 110.0 1 207 _T p C na . ic _ ;-< X >- } i \ 40' I 75 I I 96NI108 .I 191NI f 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 14.5 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 66 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene (NIST) 75 0 0 _o X >- • '49 /77 i i1112 iii1 110 n.I 51,.73 ..I.1. _ 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 14.56 75.00 76 0.002777 14.56 110.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 13-Feb-2019 15:35:24 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 117 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 15:37:37 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 Manual Integration/User Assign Peak Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHG.i\20190212-34545.b\200-34545-013.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 02:26:30 Instrument ID: CHG.i Lims ID: 200-47359-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-47359-11 Client ID: 5969 Operator ID: ert ALS Bottle#: 12 Worklist Smp#: 13 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_(v1)_G Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 68 Tetrachloroethene, CAS: 127-18-4 Signal: 1 Processing Integration Results RT: 15.03 m/z 166.0 Area: 1257 78- Amount: 0.021437 72- —: Amount Units: ppb v/v 66- 60 •- 54- 48- x 42- 36- •• I 30- •:•:.: 24 238- 30- 24 . 18- '•'•'•� 12- 14.7 14.9 15.1 15.3 Min Manual Integration Results RT: 15.03 m/z 166.0 Area: 2099 78- o Amount: 0.035796 72- Amount Units: ppb v/v 66- 60' 54' 48- • x 42- >- 36 30- :•:• Y 24' 18- 12- g 14.7 14.9 15.1 15.3 Min RT Reviewer: bunmaa, 13-Feb-2019 15:35:35 Audit Action: Manually Integrated Audit Reason: Assign Peak Page 118 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 15:37:37 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 c User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHG.i\20190212-34545.b\200-34545-013.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 02:26:30 Instrument ID: CHG.i Lims ID: 200-47359-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-47359-11 Client ID: 5969 Operator ID: ert ALS Bottle#: 12 Worklist Smp#: 13 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_(v1)_G Limit Group: Al_TO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 69 2-Hexanone, CAS: 591-78-6 Processing Results 3 Raw Spec:Scan 2337(15.43) m/z 43.0 207 2 m 2: 191N 0 2, (-3 21 X ›- 21 73N 133 253N y 1 1' 11 1 15.3 i Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 fT I m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 2337(15.43),Qvalue=1 m/z 58.0 3 207 2, 2: 191N 21 • E-, 21 X o 1: ›- 21 >7 EC 73N 133 253 ' 1 1: 1 15.3 i Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 FT I m/7 11 Ref Spec: 69 2-Hexanone (NIST) 0 0 o X 58N 100 II,. .. ,.. 1 1 I. i 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 15.43 43.00 138 0.005729 15.41 58.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 13-Feb-2019 15:35:42 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 119 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 15:37:37 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHG.i\20190212-34545.b\200-34545-013.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 02:26:30 Instrument ID: CHG.i Lims ID: 200-47359-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-47359-11 Client ID: 5969 Operator ID: ert ALS Bottle#: 12 Worklist Smp#: 13 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_(v1)_G Limit Group: AI_T015_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 75 Chlorobenzene, CAS: 108-90-7 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 2615(16.92) 31 m/z 112.0 31 117 2 rn _ cl a i 0 2 _S 21 X X 1 >- 21 - >- 1 11 82' 11 '119 52� X54 i II i I 111 (83 1161 I' 207�I1i208 253�II I 16.8 17.1 ` Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 pr I m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 2615(16.92),Qvalue=l m/z 77.0 31 117 31 . aow o_ 2 0 2, . X21 >7< 1: >- } 1 1 82il 11 '119 52� II iX54 G i 111 1 83 116 II' 207�I(208 253�I1 I 16.8 17.1 ` Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 RT I m/7 11 Ref Spec: 75 Chlorobenzene (NIST) 1 m/z 114.0 112 1 0 o o _0 1 _ X X >- >- 77 • '114 i51 ,1� 16.8 17.1 I. - ,1.-6-- Aii -- -- -- Min i 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 VT 1 m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 16.92 112.00 194 0.003218 16.92 77.00 106 16.92 114.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 13-Feb-2019 15:35:48 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 120 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 15:37:37 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHG.i\20190212-34545.b\200-34545-013.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 02:26:30 Instrument ID: CHG.i Lims ID: 200-47359-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-47359-11 Client ID: 5969 Operator ID: ert ALS Bottle#: 12 Worklist Smp#: 13 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO 15_MasterMethod_(v1)_G Limit Group: Al1-015_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 76 Ethylbenzene, CAS: 100-41-4 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 2606(16.87) m/z 91.0 2' 117 1 021 1 _ X 1: X c } 1 82N } X119 • 54 I 17.0 Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 RT m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 2606(16.87),Qvalue=3 m/z 106.0 2, 117 o >. O 21 O C • O v 1: } 1 82N } X119 • 54_ 116N.I I. 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 17.0 m/7 Min 1 Ref Spec: 76 Ethylbenzene (NIST) 91 > X106 51N v6 I. ,U. , II .. I ..I 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 m17 RT Mass Response Amount 16.87 91.00 522 0.006392 17.10 106.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 13-Feb-2019 15:35:50 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 121 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 15:37:37 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHG.i\20190212-34545.b\200-34545-013.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 02:26:30 Instrument ID: CHG.i Lims ID: 200-47359-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-47359-11 Client ID: 5969 Operator ID: ert ALS Bottle#: 12 Worklist Smp#: 13 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod (v1) G Limit Group: AlTO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 78 m-Xylene & p-Xylene, CAS: 179601-23-1 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 2696(17.35) m/z 106.0 4 207 i 2• 4 253 21 0 3 91" 0 1 i X. x r 2. 106" 191 >- 1 21 1, v75 X209 1 17.2 ` Min 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 V2T 1 m/7 4 Enhanced Spec:Scan 2696(17.35),Qvalue=0 m/z 91.0 207 i 4 4 253 1• 3 MIIIII 0 3 91N X 2: X 2. 106" j, 21 21 191" 1, 1, 75 209 i 17.2 ` Min 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 RT m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 17.35 106.00 152 0.004778 17.35 91.00 443 Reviewer: bunmaa, 13-Feb-2019 15:35:56 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 122 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 15:37:37 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHG.i\20190212-34545.b\200-34545-013.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 02:26:30 Instrument ID: CHG.i Lims ID: 200-47359-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-47359-11 Client ID: 5969 Operator ID: ert ALS Bottle#: 12 Worklist Smp#: 13 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_(v1)_G Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 84 1 ,1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane, CAS: 79-34-5 Processing Results 1 Raw Spec:Scan 3129(19.67) m/z 83.0 207 1 F 0 11 1 F1" 0 0 x 253" x ` >- G >- i • 95" 133" 176" 232N II I I II 127" 1111 19.6 Min 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 FT I m/7 1 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3129(19.67),Qvalue=1 m/z 131.0 207 1i p E x 253" x IMI >- > 95" 133" 176" 232N II I I 11 127"I 111771 G I 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 19.6 m/7 Min 1 Ref Spec: 84 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane (NIST) 1 m/z 85.0 83 o 1 0 0 0 1 XX85 G X c >- >- I_ ,I95 I� L. 60 ALL131 97 I.�.1�166 19.6 Min 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 FT I m17 RT Mass Response Amount 19.67 83.00 50 0.001004 19.68 131.00 0 19.68 85.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 13-Feb-2019 15:36:02 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 123 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 15:37:37 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHG.i\20190212-34545.b\200-34545-013.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 02:26:30 Instrument ID: CHG.i Lims ID: 200-47359-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-47359-11 Client ID: 5969 Operator ID: ert ALS Bottle#: 12 Worklist Smp#: 13 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod (v1) G Limit Group: Al_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 85 N-Propylbenzene, CAS: 103-65-1 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 3147(19.77) m/z 91.0 i N. 1 207 3: N. 0 11 31 O 0 x x 2, >- 253' j 1: 1 73N 91" 174' "95 `v208 11 I I 128'111134 II III I I X232 I 19.7 ` Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 FT 1 m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3147(19.77),Qvalue=l m/z 120.0 1 207 a • 0 11 E o c x X >- 253' >- • 73N 91" 174' i95 i II I II 128�I I r134 I III I L 208 Ii232 i , 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 19.7 m17 Min 11 Ref Spec: 85 N-Propylbenzene (NIST) 1 m/z 92.0 91 1 0 O 0 1 XX >- >- • 120NI/ 1 ` _L,- J 65 A. _d _1 92L 19.7 ` Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 FT I m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 19.77 91.00 308 0.002916 19.78 120.00 0 19.78 92.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 13-Feb-2019 15:36:05 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 124 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 15:37:37 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHG.i\20190212-34545.b\200-34545-013.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 02:26:30 Instrument ID: CHG.i Lims ID: 200-47359-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-47359-11 Client ID: 5969 Operator ID: ert ALS Bottle#: 12 Worklist Smp#: 13 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_(v1)_G Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 ( 0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 88 4-Ethyltoluene, CAS: 622-96-8 Processing Results 1 Raw Spec:Scan 3186(19.98) m/ 105.0 207 21 11 010 0 0 253" } 1 73 1174 91\ 127N '135 91NI I 11 I I I I I1I I 1 2321 II 1 19.9 Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 FT 1 m/7 1 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3186(19.98),Qvalue=1 m/z 120.0 207 1 11 0 1 • _o oES X X c >- 253 >- : 73ir I 91\ 127N '135 91N( I II I HI I� II 232I II i 19.9 i Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 FT I m17 11 Refs pec: 88 4-Ethyltoluene (NIST) 105 o 0 o _ X >- • '120 g .... 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 mi? RT Mass Response Amount 19.98 105.00 131 0.001463 19.97 120.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 13-Feb-2019 15:36:07 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 125 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 15:37:37 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHG.i\20190212-34545.b\200-34545-013.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 02:26:30 Instrument ID: CHG.i Lims ID: 200-47359-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-47359-11 Client ID: 5969 Operator ID: ert ALS Bottle#: 12 Worklist Smp#: 13 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod (v1)_G Limit Group: Al 1015 ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 90 1 ,3,5-Trimethylbenzene, CAS: 108-67-8 Processing Results 1 Raw Spec:Scan 3208(20.09) m/z 105.0 r co 207 °' 1' 2 0 0 1 0 21 `' 95\ x 11 176" x 1 253N • 11 75N i 1 1'50 91,I 9I6 1331 I 1641 I III 1208 I I 2321 20.0 ` Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 ill" I m/7 1 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3208(20.09),Qvalue=1 m/z 120.0 207 1• > a 1 E 0 95N cIF T< 11 176" x 253' T 75N 1'50 91\I I/9I6 1331 I 1641 I III I 2 8 61 I 1 I 2321 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 20.0 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 90 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene (NIST) 105 o o o X120 x >- • 77N X79 i 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 20.09 105.00 65 0.000815 20.09 120.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 13-Feb-2019 15:36:12 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 126 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 15:37:37 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHG.i\20190212-34545.b\200-34545-013.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 02:26:30 Instrument ID: CHG.i Lims ID: 200-47359-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-47359-11 Client ID: 5969 Operator ID: ert ALS Bottle#: 12 Worklist Smp#: 13 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_(v1)_G Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 89 2-Chlorotoluene, CAS: 95-49-8 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 3184(19.97) m/z 91.0 207 3: co 1 °' 3: m 0 0 1 0 2, X x r 1: 253N 1 • 95N1 176N L 232N f1 , 75 II I 197 13��I 1561I I I 1'233, II 1 19.9 Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 FT i m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3184(19.97),Qvalue=l m/z 63.0 1 207 o E _2 1 `! i X X >- ` >- 253N 253N • 95' 176N L 232' f1\1 75 II I 197 133,'I 156NI H I I 1 1/2331 II 1 i i i 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 19.9 m/7 Min 1 Ref Spec: 89 2-Chlorotoluene (NIST) 91 0 0 _o X >- ' 126 63 89� X92 125 128X ..iL.A�I.___■,1 1L.. ,..I _�.. .I i 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 m17 RT Mass Response Amount 19.97 91.00 215 0.002750 19.98 63.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 13-Feb-2019 15:36:10 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 127 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 15:37:37 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHG.i\20190212-34545.b\200-34545-013.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 02:26:30 Instrument ID: CHG.i Lims ID: 200-47359-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-47359-11 Client ID: 5969 Operator ID: ert ALS Bottle#: 12 Worklist Smp#: 13 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 .: Method: T015_MasterMethod_(v1)_G Limit Group: AI_T015_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 92 tert-Butylbenzene, CAS: 98-06-6 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 3311(20.64) m/z 119.0 1: 207 3: 31 01 0 0 2, x 1 x } 253N r 1: 1 73N 6N 191 ' _ + 3 232N i 1'44 19111 III 1 II 1163)1 111 hi 1 1 II 1 20.5 20.8 i Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 FT li m17 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3311(20.64),Qvalue=1 m/z 91.0 1: 207 5, 4 mane 1 3: co x x o >- 1 253N } 2 (NI 1: 73N + 3N 91 (44I96 1 1 III II 1.163)III 11 II 132 1 I 1 20.5 Min 20.8 G 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 (?T I m/7 1 Ref Spec: 92 tert-Butylbenzene (NIST) m/z 134.0 119 31 I o31 o 0 a 2 x X- - 1I >- 91N } 1: I I 1 1` • (134 s i 79 20.5 20.8 L. 1..��,__�.___l 1 _. Min 1 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 FT i m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 20.64 119.00 249 0.003285 20.65 91.00 188 20.63 134.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 13-Feb-2019 15:36:15 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 128 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 15:37:37 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 Y' User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHG.i\20190212-34545.b\200-34545-013.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 02:26:30 Instrument ID: CHG.i Lims ID: 200-47359-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-47359-11 Client ID: 5969 Operator ID: ert ALS Bottle#: 12 Worklist Smp#: 13 ,15 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_(v1)_G Limit Group: AITO15ICAL ; Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 93 1 ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene, CAS: 95-63-6 Processing Results 2: Raw Spec:Scan 3346(20.83) m/z 105.0 207 21 2, 0 1. 0 20 0 x x 1 1. _ 253N • >-.1 1I 133 `'208 I 731 96\11 I 10 1 I II/114 II ill II 232NII I 20.6 u Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 FT mb 2s Enhanced Spec:Scan 3346(20.83),Qvalue=1 m/z 120.0 207 1 2, 0 1 0 21 0B3 X X c } 1. -- 253N } 1 133 '208 'I / \ i I 73 I 96 II r 1 1 Til I I I 1�4 i 91 II i 232N h I I 20.6 i Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 FT I m/7 11 Ref Spec: 93 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene (NIST) 105 0 0 0 X '120 ,.I 77N L_ J. .�A.. 11__1 .1 [xi 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 20.83 105.00 52 0.000660 20.73 120.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 13-Feb-2019 15:36:17 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 129 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 15:37:37 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHG.i\20190212-34545.b\200-34545-013.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 02:26:30 Instrument ID: CHG.i Lims ID: 200-47359-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-47359-11 Client ID: 5969 Operator ID: ert ALS Bottle#: 12 Worklist Smp#: 13 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 , Method: TO15_MasterMethod (v1)_G Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 94 sec-Butylbenzene, CAS: 135-98-8 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 3374(20.98) 3C m/z 105.0 3 207 31 31 0 0 2, _0 2 x X1: —>_ 21 >- 1 1 253" : 11 191) `"20Q8 _ III 91 I I 127NI III 47\I 11177 II I I 1/219 I/232 I I 20.9 Min i 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 FT m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3374(20.98),Qvalue=1 m/z 134.0 3 207 31 _ 31 2 0 0 0 2 '>–< 21 X 21 } 1 1 11 253" 11 191) 208 96 127" 147 " '232 i I I I I I I I III I 11177 II 11 2Q9 I I I 20.9 ` I Min 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 IpT i m/7 Ref Spec: 94 sec-Butylbenzene (NIST) m/z 91.0 11 105 4 ED' 3 f 0 0 0 2: X : X 21 r } 1: 91� 134) G 20.9 ���- I. I' Min i 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 FT I m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 20.98 105.00 199 0.001794 20.98 134.00 54 20.99 91.00 473 Reviewer: bunmaa, 13-Feb-2019 15:36:19 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 130 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 15:37:37 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHG.i\20190212-34545.b\200-34545-013.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 02:26:30 Instrument ID: CHG.i Lims ID: 200-47359-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-47359-11 Client ID: 5969 Operator ID: ert ALS Bottle#: 12 Worklist Smp#: 13 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_(v1)_G Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 95 4-Isopropyltoluene, CAS: 99-87-6 Processing Results 4 Raw Spec:Scan 3409(21.17) m/z 1190 207 5� - \f\iI 3: 4 c 0 0 31 0 3: X j< \ PA 2� 2 I \A(A) 1: 253N 1: 1 '208 73 N1 135W" 191"I i''232 i ` I �I 961 1 1 I I I 11I (14hI I Ili I I II I II i I 21.0 Min 21.3 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 FT m/7 4 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3409(21.17),Qvalue=1 m/z 134.0 207 31 3: 2 _ c) 31 a 21 I / JI 11118 X X >- 2' ;_--- 1 I I 1: 253N 11 1 208 II_ 73N. 96\1 135NI 191NI '232 i ` i I 11 II I I I c I Id 1'14111 II III I i II I II V I 21.0 21.3 Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 FT I m/7 11 Ref Spec: 95 4-Isopropyltoluene (NIST) 4s m/z 91.0 119 I I 0 2 o 41 N 0 0 0 3 1\11 X x >- : > 2' I \ 1: '134 II I 91 i 1 �.�. 17 ',L I 21.0 21.3 .. o-_..I_. �. 11tl L i Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 FT I m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 21.17 119.00 200 0.002109 21.19 91.00 213 21.19 134.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 13-Feb-2019 15:36:21 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 131 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 15:37:37 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHG.i\20190212-34545.b\200-34545-013.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 02:26:30 Instrument ID: CHG.i Lims ID: 200-47359-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-47359-11 Client ID: 5969 Operator ID: ert ALS Bottle#: 12 Worklist Smp#: 13 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15MasterMethod_(v1)_G Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 96 1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene, CAS: 541-73-1 Processing Results 4 Raw Spec:Scan 3416(21.21) m/z 146.0 207 4 3: 35 0 c) 31 a 2: X- x } 2, >—- 21 1: 1, 253N 1 191N1 '208 X232 96 }33 X146 73� } �I li II i 111 I I I Ii 1 `I IIi i I 1 �I I 1111 21.0 21.3 ` Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 VT 1 m17 4 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3416(21.21),Qvalue=1 m/z 111.0 207 21 I I 3: a 31 0 1: 1 mill 2, >- } 1: 253 1 191N X208 232 ` — . — 96 }}33 I 146 6 73 II I ill l I I d III III i I LSI Y I I I S 21.0 21.3 ` Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 FT 1 m/7 11 Ref Spec: 961,3-Dichlorobenzene (NIST) m/z 148.0 146 31 0 2 0o 0 21 j< 148 x -- 1 } 111N - } 11 • 75N 50 I 73\I X113 150 21.0 21.3 _6. 1L.i.,. Jd l.. AL 1.11. Min i 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 FT i m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 21.21 146.00 689 0.010485 21.20 111.00 0 21.20 148.00 313 Reviewer: bunmaa, 13-Feb-2019 15:36:24 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 132 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 15:37:37 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHG.i\20190212-34545.b\200-34545-013.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 02:26:30 Instrument ID: CHG.i Lims ID: 200-47359-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-47359-11 Client ID: 5969 Operator ID: ert ALS Bottle#: 12 Worklist Smp#: 13 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15MasterMethod_(v1)_G Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 97 1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene, CAS: 106-46-7 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 3443(21.35) 5� m/z 146.0 4 207 3: 4 0 c) 31 0 3: X X 2 >- 2, > 1: 1: 253N 1 II� (I � 232 I 1 44 73\� 91`� II I In 111 it II �1 1461 1111 III i I I AL L 21.2 21.5 i Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 FT I m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3443(21.35),Qvalue=1 m/z 111.0 4 207 v 3: 2 m N 0 31 0 21113 X X 1 >- 2, } 1: 11 I 253N 1 X232I i 6 I I44 73\ 91� I 133� I146 191� Ih 1 „ IlilI1L ` 1 II1I 11111, 21.2 21.5 Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 RT I m/7 Ref Spec: 97 1,4-Dichlorobenzene (NIST) m/z 148.0 11 / o 146 3: -�., o 31 i 0 X148 X 2, r � 1: • 1 111N 50�� 75 (150 21.2 21.5 A. _.L .� y_ 11. 113_. hL Min i 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 p 1 mh RT Mass Response Amount 21.35 146.00 848 0.012355 21.34 111.00 188 21.34 148.00 291 Reviewer: bunmaa, 13-Feb-2019 15:36:30 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 133 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 15:37:37 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHG.i\20190212-34545.b\200-34545-013.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 02:26:30 Instrument ID: CHG.i Lims ID: 200-47359-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-47359-11 Client ID: 5969 Operator ID: ert ALS Bottle#: 12 Worklist Smp#: 13 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_(v1) G Limit Group: AlTO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 98 Benzyl chloride, CAS: 100-44-7 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 3480(21.55) m/z 91.0 rn 4• 207 8 N 7 N 0 40 0 6 X 3 >,-.< 51 >- 2: } 3• Ili 21 2531 2 1, 731 96� 133 3 193�II I 208232 1 /115 I Y 21.4 21.7 1 11 1 11 1 I Illi II II 1 1 i 1 I I I 1 i i i Min 6 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 RT 1 m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3480(21.55),Qvalue=1 24- m/z 126.0 207 "' 4• 20- 0 4 0 16- ilF X 3 x 12- >- 2: >- 8' 21 253" 4 1, 73' 96' 133 3 193�II r208 1. 232 0 I1 i I — I /115 I II II 1 21.4 21.7 111 I 11 • I Illi d 11 I ill l I dill i L I I Min 6 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 FT I m/7 1 Ref Spec: 98 Benzyl chloride (NIST) m/z 65.0 91 6' T • •E O - 0 C XX >- >- • 126 65 891,1r.92 j(128 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 21.4 21.7 m/7 Min RT Mass Response Amount 21.55 91.00 629 0.009580 21.55 126.00 216 21.56 65.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 13-Feb-2019 15:36:48 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 134 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 15:37:37 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHG.i\20190212-34545.b\200-34545-013.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 02:26:30 Instrument ID: CHG.i Lims ID: 200-47359-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-47359-11 Client ID: 5969 Operator ID: ert ALS Bottle#: 12 Worklist Smp#: 13 r, Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_(v1)_G Limit Group: AITO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 ( 0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 100 n-Butylbenzene, CAS: 104-51-8 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 3524(21.78) m/z 91.0 6 207 54- 171AI 5' 45- M o Y J' V 4 X 36- I1 Ir I j 3: >- 27- 14 i 1 2 18- 1: 253" g c 73 96 133 1.135 1 91II IX208 1232 a i . 1 I . Niid I I .I I lit i. i ,Iii u LII I.II 1 I di 1I.. 21.6 21.9 Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 FT 1 m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3524(21.78),Qvalue=1 m/z 134.0 6 207 66' 4 55- 1 5� r� 0 4 0 44glia 0 X j< 33- 1 N } 3: >- n I, I ' 2 22 J 1: 253 11- I 73� 96\ 133 i 191 X208 1232 0 _1\1 1 I i _ I I _ riii 1 .I I I` 135 I `I� I.l� I I I .h I I,, 21.6 21.9 I I . ii 1 1. I .h. e. Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 FT I m/7 11 i Ref Spec: 100 n-Butylbenzene (NIST) m/z 92.0 91 2' o 21 o _ 0 0 1: X : /92 x >- 1 >- • 134" 65�II X105 21.6 21.9 1. .1.----_�J.- ._.Ili -..r ...l. - - M in I 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 FT I m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 21.78 91.00 1226 0.014335 21.77 134.00 88 21.79 92.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 13-Feb-2019 15:37:03 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 135 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 15:37:37 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHG.i\20190212-34545.b\200-34545-013.0 Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 02:26:30 Instrument ID: CHG.i Lims ID: 200-47359-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-47359-11 Client ID: 5969 Operator ID: ert ALS Bottle#: 12 Worklist Smp#: 13 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_(v1)_G Limit Group: AI_TO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 101 1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene, CAS: 95-50-1 Processing Results 7 Raw Spec:Scan 3541(21.87) 5' m/z 146.0 Ln 207 oo 6 4 N 0 5' o_ 31 x 4 x 2 > 31 > 1: 2 253N '208 c. 96� 133 '147 191 • I I73 II II II I .. 1 k II II Ili 1 I IInl 11 ILII III h 1 LI I II II 11. 21.8 Min G 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 IST I m/7 7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3541(21.87),Qvalue=1 m/z 111.0 207 2 6 oo 0 5 O 21 N MIMI x 4 X 1 } 3: > 11 2 253N 1: I '208 I 11. ° 73" 96�I 1133 (147 1I91NH I L 21.8I 11II 11I I I III II II IIS 1 1101 JI I 1 1 II I 1 1 I� 11 Min i 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 FT 1 m/7 11 Ref Spec: 101 1,2-Dichlorobenzene (NIST) 4 m/z 48.0 146ooli 3 Q ; N CD O 0 2: _ '> '148 x 21 >- >- 1, 111N 75N i LI J '113 (150 21.8 1 ` __ . 73 11 .II 1. ... _.1 II. __ -II M i n 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 FT I m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 21.87 146.00 409 0.006173 21.87 111.00 49 21.87 148.00 251 Reviewer: bunmaa, 13-Feb-2019 15:37:13 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 136 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 15:37:37 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHG.i\20190212-34545.b\200-34545-013.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 02:26:30 Instrument ID: CHG.i Lims ID: 200-47359-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-47359-11 Client ID: 5969 Operator ID: ert ALS Bottle#: 12 Worklist Smp#: 13 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_(v1)_G Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 103 1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene, CAS: 120-82-1 Processing Results 1 Raw Spec:Scan 3989(24.27) m/z 180.0 207 7 o^ 1i 61 1 0 >'R X 4: >- >- 3: 2, ' 1 191" I208 1253" 1 . I . 73\In. .9 III .. ..1.31 LI.1 5 . ... �,11. Id. .. 6 . . L . .I..IL. I1. 24.0 24.3 i Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 Iv i m/7 1 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3989(24.27),Qvalue=1 m/z 182.0 207 61 Q N 0 11 51 v 0 0 0 41 X X Ea X ; >- 31 21 • i 11 191 208 253Ni 6 I y} 24.0 24.3 ` . I 73 In, .96I I . ..1.31 111.65 . ... �.&L. III. .. 6 . I. .6.IL. II. Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 FjT I mh 11 Ref Spec: 1031,2,4-Trichlorobenz ne (NIST) \ 180 182 o , 0 o '>R X 145" ' '184 109"1 147 7 \I�73 I X7 ..IL_I. 4 N11'�_. _6._ I�._ ...5 .1 0,1'146 111 G 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 24.27 180.00 1343 0.025610 24.27 182.00 537 Reviewer: bunmaa, 13-Feb-2019 15:37:17 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 137 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 15:37:37 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHG.i\20190212-34545.b\200-34545-013.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 02:26:30 Instrument ID: CHG.i Lims ID: 200-47359-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-47359-11 Client ID: 5969 Operator ID: ert ALS Bottle#: 12 Worklist Smp#: 13 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: T015_MasterMethod_(v1) G Limit Group: Al 1015 ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 104 Hexachlorobutadiene, CAS: 87-68-3 Processing Results 1 Raw Spec:Scan 4020(24.44) 4 m/z 225.0 207 v O N 11 3 O O o 2: x _ x 21 >- i >- 1, 3 191�II '208 q\I ` - 73\L...96� i i. .1133. .11. ]5 ...i. Y�. .,.i. ��. 26.h ` 24.2 Min 24.5 i ` 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 VI I m/7 1 Enhanced Spec:Scan 4020(24.44),Qvalue=� m/z 223.0 co 207 30- v 011 _ I NW1 Ems oo v 24 l� I x ' >'R' 18- " 1 } s } 12- g ,.III__ 96 133 3 191�I II�208 261 0 1 — — _ i 1 i .... . I.... .� I i. . ..I •. .Ii/175 ...1. L. l�. IL .,.I. I�, I. I ` 24.2 24.5 i Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 FT 1 m/7 11 Ref Spec: 104 Hexachlorobutadiene (NIST) 225 o 0 0 X 223.N '227 } 190 • 118 260 141 7143 1192 7229 83) 9 I _IL i h. 11 L 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 24.44 225.00 700 0.011987 24.44 223.00 271 Reviewer: bunmaa, 13-Feb-2019 15:37:23 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 138 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 15:37:37 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHG.i\20190212-34545.b\200-34545-013.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 02:26:30 Instrument ID: CHG.i Lims ID: 200-47359-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-47359-11 Client ID: 5969 Operator ID: ert ALS Bottle#: 12 Worklist Smp#: 13 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_(v1) G Limit Group: AlTO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 ( 0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 105 Naphthalene, CAS: 91-20-3 Processing Results 1 Raw Spec:Scan 4068(24.69) m/z 128.0 207 7' o^ 1 65 0 11 0 5 X X } >- 3• L 2: 1 208 II,,. .. p 73� 96 133 191\{I1,209 I. 2 h 24.5 24.8 �... .� ..�. .J lr i� .1.., Min i 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 FT m17 1 Enhanced Spec:Scan 4068(24.69),Qvalue=1 207 0 1 0 0 11 X II,, `` 208 pp II 73\L.. 96"i .1 . .;33,1 i� 191\1!. ..1, 209 I. . ?6h 4 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 mh 1 Ref Spec: 105 Naphthalene (NIST) 128 } 51`j.. Jl 6`i� 192;L 127 JII X129 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 m17 RT Mass Response Amount 24.69 128.00 1199 0.014879 Reviewer: bunmaa, 13-Feb-2019 15:37:32 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 139 of 407 3/7/2019 FORM I AIR - GC/MS VOA ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: TestAmerica Burlington Job No. : 200-47377-1 SDG No. : Client Sample ID: 5950 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-1 Matrix: Air Lab File ID: 34571-06.D Analysis Method: TO-15 Date Collected: 02/12/2019 00:00 Sample wt/vol: 200 (mL) Date Analyzed: 02/13/2019 17:00 Soil Aliquot Vol: Dilution Factor: 1 Soil Extract Vol. : GC Column: RTX-624 ID: 0.32 (mm) % Moisture: Level: (low/med) Low Analysis Batch No. : 139960 Units: ppb v/v CAS NO. COMPOUND NAME RESULT Q RL RL 115-07-1 Propylene 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 75-71-8 Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-45-6 Freon 22 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 76-14-2 1,2 Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 f . - 74-87-3 Chloromethane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 106-97-8 n-Butane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-01-4 Vinyl chloride 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 106-99-0 1,3-Butadiene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 Mil 74-83-9 Bromomethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-00-3 Chloroethane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 593-60-2 Bromoethene(Vinyl Bromide) 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-69-4 Trichlorofluoromethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 64-17-5 Ethanol 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 76-13-1 Freon TF 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-35-4 1,1-Dichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 67-64-1 Acetone 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 67-63-0 Isopropyl alcohol 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 75-15-0 Carbon disulfide 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 107-05-1 3-Chloropropene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-09-2 Methylene Chloride 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-65-0 tert-Butyl alcohol 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 1634-04-4 Methyl tert-butyl ether 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 156-60-5 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 110-54-3 n-Hexane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-34-3 1,1-Dichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-05-4 Vinyl acetate 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 141-78-6 Ethyl acetate 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 78-93-3 Methyl Ethyl Ketone 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 156-59-2 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 540-59-0 1,2-Dichloroethene, Total 0.40 U 0.40 0.40 67-66-3 Chloroform 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 109-99-9 Tetrahydrofuran 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 71-55-6 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 110-82-7 Cyclohexane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 56-23-5 Carbon tetrachloride 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 540-84-1 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 FORM I TO-15 Page 140 of 407 3/7/2019 FORM I AIR - GC/MS VOA ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: TestAmerica Burlington Job No. : 200-47377-1 SDG No. : Client Sample ID: 5950 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-1 t' -v Matrix: Air Lab File ID: 34571-06.D " Analysis Method: TO-15 Date Collected: 02/12/2019 00:00 Sample wt/vol: 200 (mL) Date Analyzed: 02/13/2019 17:00 Soil Aliquot Vol: Dilution Factor: 1 Soil Extract Vol. : GC Column: RTX-624 ID: 0.32 (mm) % Moisture: Level: (low/med) Low Analysis Batch No. : 139960 Units: ppb v/v CAS NO. COMPOUND NAME RESULT Q RL RL 71-43-2 Benzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 107-06-2 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 142-82-5 n-Heptane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 79-01-6 Trichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 80-62-6 Methyl methacrylate 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 78-87-5 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 123-91-1 1,4-Dioxane 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 • 75-27-4 Bromodichloromethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20IE 10061-01-5 cis 1,3 Dichloropropene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-10-1 methyl isobutyl ketone 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 108-88-3 Toluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 10061-02-6 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 79-00-5 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 127-18-4 Tetrachloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 591-78-6 Methyl Butyl Ketone (2-Hexanone) 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 124-48-1 Dibromochloromethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 106-93-4 1,2-Dibromoethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-90-7 Chlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 100-41-4 Ethylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 179601-23-1 m,p-Xylene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 95-47-6 Xylene, o- 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 1330-20-7 Xylene (total) 0.70 U 0.70 0.70 100-42-5 Styrene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-25-2 Bromoform 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 98-82-8 Cumene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 79-34-5 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 103-65-1 n-Propylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 622-96-8 4-Ethyltoluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-67-8 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 95-49-8 2-Chlorotoluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 98-06-6 tert-Butylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 95-63-6 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 135-98-8 sec-Butylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 99-87-6 4-Isopropyltoluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 541-73-1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 106-46-7 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 FORM I TO-15 Page 141 of 407 3/7/2019 ItAl Af FORM I AIR - GC/MS VOA ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: TestAmerica Burlington Job No. : 200-47377-1 SDG No. : Client Sample ID: 5950 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-1 Matrix: Air Lab File ID: 34571-06.D Analysis Method: TO-15 Date Collected: 02/12/2019 00:00 Sample wt/vol: 200 (mL) Date Analyzed: 02/13/2019 17:00 Soil Aliquot Vol: Dilution Factor: 1 Soil Extract Vol. : GC Column: RTX-624 ID: 0.32 (mm) % Moisture: Level: (low/med) Low Analysis Batch No. : 139960 Units: ppb v/v CAS NO. COMPOUND NAME RESULT Q RL RL 100-44-7 Benzyl chloride 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 104-51-8 n-Butylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 95-50-1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 44p= 120-82-1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 "'" ` 87-68-3 Hexachlorobutadiene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 91-20-3 Naphthalene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 451 FORM I TO-15 Page 142 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:50 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 TestAmerica Burlington Target Compound Quantitation Report Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-06.D Lims ID: 200-47377-A-1 Client ID: 5950 Sample Type: Client Inject. Date: 13-Feb-2019 17:00:30 ALS Bottle#: 5 Worklist Smp#: 6 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Sample Info: 200-0034571-006 Misc. Info.: 47377-01 Operator ID: ggg Instrument ID: CHB.i Method: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\TO15_LLNJ_TO3.m Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Last Update: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:35 Calib Date: 13-Feb-2019 03:59:30 Integrator: RTE ID Type: Deconvolution ID Quant Method: Internal/External Standard Quant By: Initial Calibration Last ICal File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190212-34558.b\34558-14.D Column 1 : RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Det: MS SCAN Process Host: CTX0307 First Level Reviewer: bunmaa Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:58:56 RT Adj RT Dlt RT OnCol Amt Compound Sig (min.) (min.) (min.) Q Response ppb v/v Flags 1 Propene 41 3.135 ND MU 2 Dichlorodifluoromethane 85 3.193 ND • 3 Chlorodifluoromethane 51 3.231 ND UIE 4 1,2-Dichloro-1,1,2,2-tetra 85 3.412 ND 5 Chloromethane 50 3.535 ND U 6 Butane 43 3.711 ND 7 Vinyl chloride 62 3.743 ND 8 Butadiene 54 3.807 ND 10 Bromomethane 94 4.463 ND 11 Chloroethane 64 4.693 ND 13 Vinyl bromide 106 5.099 ND U 14 Trichlorofluoromethane 101 5.205 ND MU 16 Ethanol 45 5.659 ND U 19 1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trif 101 6.225 ND 20 1,1-Dichloroethene 96 6.294 ND 21 Acetone 43 6.438 ND 22 Isopropyl alcohol 45 6.668 ND U 23 Carbon disulfide 76 6.721 ND MU 24 3-Chloro-1-propene 41 6.988 ND 27 Methylene Chloride 49 7.249 7.244 0.005 76 1209 0.0414 7M 28 2-Methyl-2-propanol 59 7.367 ND 29 Methyl tert-butyl ether 73 7.602 ND U 30 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 61 7.655 ND U 32 Hexane 57 7.991 7.986 0.005 87 7604 0.1404 33 1,1-Dichloroethane 63 8.391 ND U 34 Vinyl acetate 43 8.402 ND U 36 2-Butanone (MEK) 72 9.277 ND U 37 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 96 9.293 ND U 35 Ethyl acetate 88 9.293 ND * 39 Chlorobromomethane 128 9.656 9.662 -0.006 78 300738 10.0 38 Tetrahydrofuran 42 9.678 ND U Page 143 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:50 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\Chrom Data\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-06.D RT Adj RT Dlt RT OnCol Amt Compound Sig (min.) (min.) (min.) Q Response ppb v/v Flags 40 Chloroform 83 9.736 ND MUa 42 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 97 9.992 ND MU S 41 1,2-Dichloroethene, Total 61 10.000 ND 43 Cyclohexane 84 10.014 ND 44 Carbon tetrachloride 117 10.201 ND 45 Isooctane 57 10.489 ND MUa 46 Benzene 78 10.526 10.526 0.000 95 5300 0.0552 47 1,2-Dichloroethane 62 10.622 ND 48 n-Heptane 43 10.740 ND U 50 1,4-Difluorobenzene 114 11.060 11.065 -0.005 93 1323279 10.0 53 Trichloroethene 95 11.439 11.439 0.000 1 727 0.0169 7M 54 1,2-Dichloropropane 63 11.802 ND 55 Methyl methacrylate 69 11.839 ND 56 1,4-Dioxane 88 11.930 ND 57 Dibromomethane 174 11.988 11.988 0.000 86 1596 0.0349 58 Dichlorobromomethane 83 12.159 ND 60 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 75 12.789 ND U 61 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK 43 12.933 ND U 64 Toluene 92 13.227 13.221 0.006 90 3543 0.0498 66 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 75 13.579 ND U 67 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 83 13.851 ND MU 68 Tetrachloroethene 166 13.990 13.995 -0.005 82 1150 0.0174 7M 69 2-Hexanone 43 14.113 ND MU 70 Chlorodibromomethane 129 14.406 ND 1 71 Ethylene Dibromide 107 14.609 ND 72 Chlorobenzene-d5 117 15.169 15.175 -0.006 82 1153715 10.0 73 Chlorobenzene 112 15.212 ND 74 Ethylbenzene 91 15.276 15.281 -0.005 95 7867 0.0541 76 m-Xylene & p-Xylene 106 15.431 ND MU 78 o-Xylene 106 15.943 15.943 0.000 97 2554 0.0430 79 Styrene 104 15.964 ND S 77 Xylenes, Total 106 0 0.0430 7 80 Bromoform 173 16.258 ND 81 lsopropylbenzene 105 16.354 ND 83 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 83 16.765 16.760 0.005 86 2157 0.0242 7Ma 84 N-Propylbenzene 91 16.840 ND 87 4-Ethyltoluene 105 16.962 ND 88 2-Chlorotoluene 91 17.005 ND 89 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 105 17.032 ND 91 tert-Butylbenzene 119 17.400 ND 92 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 105 17.475 ND 93 sec-Butylbenzene 105 17.662 ND 94 4-Isopropyltoluene 119 17.811 ND 95 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 146 17.891 17.886 0.005 91 3601 0.0367 96 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 146 18.009 17.998 0.010 94 4053 0.0416 97 Benzyl chloride 91 18.147 ND 99 n-Butylbenzene 91 18.318 ND 100 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 146 18.489 18.484 0.005 93 3409 0.0360 103 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 180 20.832 20.826 0.006 92 6005 0.0853 104 Hexachlorobutadiene 225 20.997 ND 105 Naphthalene 128 21.296 ND Page 144 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:50 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 ' ;r QC Flag Legend Processing Flags 7- Failed Limit of Detection Review Flags M - Manually Integrated U - Marked Undetected a - User Assigned ID Reagents: ATTO15BISs_00007 Amount Added: 20.00 Units: mL Run Reagent IB3 Page 145 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date:14-Feb-2019 10:38:50 Chrom Revision:2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-06.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 17:00:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Operator ID: ggg Lims ID: 200-47377-A-1 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-1 Worklist Smp#: 6 Client ID: 5950 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil.Factor: 1.0000 ALS Bottle#: 5 Method: TO15LLNJTO3 Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column:RTX-624(0.32 mm) Y Scaling:Method Defined:Scale to the Nth Largest Target:1 2 34571-06[MS SCAN Chro]:Total 'ti m CO 21 Iri 1• Li -o C:c 1: + N O C LO m 1 0 0 O 1: c U al N 1' aai .O O 1• 9 G C 1 N v O to Si °' • S ' 1 t } E 2 o `o 111 • U • II.I1111I11J II III I IW U II II `L1 t111 Lt 11 1111)1111 D1111 II 1111 I I II W HILL II I I LI II L11111111 I111t1 I1LL11111111111L.111 111 1111111 1111111 IL I ILL 1111 111 0 1 I III IIIIL 6 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 Min Page 146 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:50 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-06.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 17:00:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-1 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-1 Client ID: 5950 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 5 Worklist Smp#: 6 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AI_TO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 3 Chlorodifluoromethane, CAS: 75-45-6 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 47(3.23) m/z 51.0 1 4 00 3: x X 2 } } 1. II44� 511 78) 3.1 Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 FT 1 m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 47(3.23),Qvalue=1 m/z 67.0 1EEI o • 0 1 X 44� 51I 78NI i 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 3.1 m/7 Min 1 Ref Spec: 3 Chlorodifluoromethane (NIST) m/z 69.0 51 X } 67" ` 35�� , 150 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 3.1 Min RT Mass Response Amount 3.23 51.00 70 0.002375 3.23 67.00 0 3.23 69.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 10:51:28 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 147 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:50 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-06.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 17:00:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-1 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-1 Client ID: 5950 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 5 Worklist Smp#: 6 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 5 Chloromethane, CAS: 74-87-3 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 107(3.55) m/z 50.0 3: 1 31 CD- ' 0 2 0 1 x X1: >- >- 1 44N : 50'1 i 3.4 3.7 i Min 40 42 44 46 48 50 RT m17 Enhanced Spec:Scan 107(3.55),Qvalue=1 m/z 52.0 o^ C 0 1 .G X >< >_ c >- 44N 50,1 40 42 44 46 48 50 3.4 3.7 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 5 Chloromethane (NIST) 50 0 0 0 X i 40 42 44 46 48 50 RT Mass Response Amount 3.55 50.00 436 0.022932 3.53 52.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 10:51:38 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 148 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:50 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-06.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 17:00:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-1 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-1 Client ID: 5950 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 5 Worklist Smp#: 6 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: T015LLNJT03 Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 13 Vinyl bromide, CAS: 593-60-2 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 401(5.12) m/z 106.0 0 il 1 2 0 21 0 1 0 x x 1 >- c >- r44 11 78'I 106�I 5.0 1 Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 104 108 FT mh Enhanced Spec:Scan 401(5.12),Qvalue=1 m/z 108.0 1 2• 0 21 x 1 X 1: III >- ' } 1 X44 781 106I I ` 5.0 Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 104 108 FT I m/7 11 Ref Spec: 13 Vinyl bromide (NIST) m/z 81.0 106 T C C O o X x • >- . 81 1, I . 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 104 108 5.0 Min RT Mass Response Amount 5.12 106.00 223 0.007490 5.10 108.00 0 5.10 81.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 10:51:51 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 149 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:50 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-06.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 17:00:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-1 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-1 Client ID: 5950 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 5 Worklist Smp#: 6 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 14 Trichlorofluoromethane, CAS: 75-69-4 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 416(5.20) m/z 101.0 4: 1 o 41 N o 0 1 0 X 3 IX c v 2' >- }'44 1: • 101 17103 i 5.1 i Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 104 108 FT 1 mh Enhanced Spec:Scan 416(5.20),Qvalue=l m/z 103.0 2J 1 2i i. 0 01 1 0 1: X x 1 IF 1 >. 744 >_ • • 101 - 103 i 5.1 i Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 104 108 RT I mh 11 Ref Spec: 14 Trichlorofluoromethane (NIST) 101 o 0 7103 _ io X 66` X35 105 I i47 I . i 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 104 108 RT Mass Response Amount 5.20 101.00 235 0.003892 5.20 103.00 69 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 10:52:16 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 150 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:50 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report `' TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-06.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 17:00:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-1 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-1 Client ID: 5950 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 5 Worklist Smp#: 6 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: 1015LLNJT03 Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 16 Ethanol, CAS: 64-17-5 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 509(5.70) m/z 45.0 1: co 3: rn 1 31 n 0 01 0 X 2 X } e ;_-"" 1: 1 44N i 45 i 5.5 5.8 i Min 40 42 44 46 48 50 FT m/7 1: Enhanced Spec:Scan 509(5.70),Qvalue=1 m/z 46.0 113 1 ', p •E ,.., X 1 , >_ ' 44N 45NI 40 42 44 46 48 50 5.5 5.8 mh Min 1i Ref Spec: 16 Ethanol (NIST) 45 o 0 CD _ i X 46N 43," 42"I i . 40 42 44 46 48 50 RT Mass Response Amount 5.70 45.00 306 0.029909 5.66 46.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 10:52:19 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 151 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:50 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-06.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 17:00:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-1 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-1 Client ID: 5950 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 5 Worklist Smp#: 6 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJTO3 Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 ( 0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 22 Isopropyl alcohol, CAS: 67-63-0 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 704(6.74) 31 m/z 45.0 1: 1, 2 i _0 1 0 21 X 11X 1 > 44N >- 11 6 76N 1'456 - 6.5 6.8 ` Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 FT m/7 Amdis Enhanced Spec:Scan 704(6.74),Qvalue=26 m/z 43.0 91 76 1 11 7: o 1 X 6 X • >- 5 . \'' 3• 2: i 1 6.5 6.8 ` Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 FT i m/7 Ref Spec: 22 Isopropyl alcohol (NIST) 11 i 45 a- c, o_ X 43N I . I . . i . i 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 RT Mass Response Amount 6.74 45.00 622 0.017672 6.67 43.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 10:52:32 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 152 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:50 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-06.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 17:00:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-1 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-1 Client ID: 5950 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 5 Worklist Smp#: 6 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15LLNJTO3 Limit Group: Al_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 23 Carbon disulfide, CAS: 75-15-0 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 703(6.73) m/z 76.0 1: 6: 1, 5 0 1 11 0 4, x >- • 44N > 3 76� 2 • 11 I�45 6.5 6.8 Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 �?T m7 Amdis Enhanced Spec:Scan 703(6.73),Qvalue=94 91 76 7 X 6• >- 5 3• 2: 1 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 m17 1 Ref Spec: 23 Carbon disulfide (NIST) 76 _o x • 44N 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 RT Mass Response Amount 6.73 76.00 1342 0.016235 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 10:52:42 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 153 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:50 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 Manual Integration/User Assign Peak Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-06.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 17:00:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-1 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-1 Client ID: 5950 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 5 Worklist Smp#: 6 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15LLNJTO3 Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 27 Methylene Chloride, CAS: 75-09-2 Signal: 1 Processing Integration Results RT: 7.24 m/z 49.0 Area: 622 56- C Amount: 0.021313 52- Amount Units: ppb v/v 48- 44- • 40- o 36- • x 32- } 2S • 24- 20- 16 •- 12 4 6.9 7.1 7.3 7.5 Min Manual Integration Results RT: 7.25 m/z 49.0 Area: 1209 58- Amount: 0.041428 52^ Amount Units: ppb v/v 48- 44- 40- 36 • - 32 •- x — 2O(y�. 24- • . .' 20- 16- 12- 8. 6-16-12- : . • 0' I 1 I I 6.9 7.1 7.3 7.5 Min RT I I Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 10:52:56 Audit Action: Manually Integrated Audit Reason:Assign Peak Page 154 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:50 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 ir User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-06.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 17:00:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-1 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-1 Client ID: 5950 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 5 Worklist Smp#: 6 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15LLNJTO3 Limit Group: AlTO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 29 Methyl tert-butyl ether, CAS: 1634-04-4 Processing Results 1• 3'Raw Spec:Scan 880(7.68) m/z 73.0 " 1 31 y 0 0 11 0 2, X X } } 1. 1 44\ 73N 7.3 7.6 7.9 i Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 RTI I m/7 1 Enhanced Spec:Scan 880(7.68),Qvalue=1 m/z 43.0 1 >. E .c • 0 11El X X • 44N 73N 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 7.3 7.6 7.9 m/7 Min 1 Ref Spec: 29 Methyl tert-butyl ether (NIST) 73 0 0 o X 57) 43 i 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 RT Mass Response Amount 7.68 73.00 1029 0.013941 7.60 43.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 10:53:09 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 155 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:50 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-06.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 17:00:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Urns ID: 200-47377-A-1 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-1 Client ID: 5950 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 5 Worklist Smp#: 6 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJTO3 Limit Group: Al_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 ( 0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 30 trans-1 ,2-Dichloroethene, CAS: 156-60-5 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 874(7.64) m/z 61.0 2, 2, 21 21 0 l; X 1: � 1 } 44N i 61NI 73NI 7.6 Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 FT m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 874(7.64),Qvalue=l m/z 96.0 2, 2 0 2i0 21 X 1: x 1 } 1 } 1, • 44N ` I 61NI 73) 7.6 Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 RT m/7 11 Ref Spec: 30 trans-1,2-Di hloroethene (NIST) 61 X 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 RT Mass Response Amount 7.64 61.00 156 0.003728 7.65 96.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 10:53:12 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 156 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:51 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-06.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 17:00:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-1 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-1 Client ID: 5950 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 5 Worklist Smp#: 6 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15LLNJTO3 Limit Group: AlTO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 33 1 ,1-Dichloroethane, CAS: 75-34-3 Processing Results 1 Raw Spec:Scan 1015(8.40) m/z 63.0 31 • 1 : 0 2 0 11 _o X X 21 >- r 1 11 44•. 63N 8.2 8.5 G Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 FT i m/7 " 1 Enhanced Spec:Scan 1015(8.40),Qvalue=1 m/z 65.0 2' 1 0 1. 0 11 0Ea X X 1 } 441 63 8.2 8.5 i Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 FT t mb 11 Ref Spec: 33 1,1-Dichloroethane (NIST) m/z 83.0 63 c c 0 o X • } X65 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 8.2 8.5 Min RT Mass Response Amount 8.40 63.00 458 0.008547 8.39 65.00 0 8.39 83.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 10:53:21 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 157 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:51 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-06.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 17:00:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-1 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-1 Client ID: 5950 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 5 Worklist Smp#: 6 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15LLNJTO3 Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 34 Vinyl acetate, CAS: 108-05-4 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 1027(8.46) m/z 43.0 1, 2 121 o x_ o 1i X 1 r >- 11 44N 43N i 8.2 8.5 Min 40 42 44 46 48 50 FT i m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 1027(8.46),Qvalue=1 m/z 86.0 1, 0 1 •c1 o 4.L.- >'R X 1i >- • >- •44N 43N 40 42 44 46 48 50 8.2 8.5 m17 Min 11 Ref Spec: 34 Vinyl acetate (NIST) 43 0 0 _o X • i 40 42 44 46 48 50 RT Mass Response Amount 8.46 43.00 305 0.005221 8.40 86.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 10:53:24 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 158 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:51 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-06.0 Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 17:00:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-1 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-1 Client ID: 5950 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 5 Worklist Smp#: 6 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 36 2-Butanone (MEK), CAS: 78-93-3 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 1189(9.33) m/z 72.0 k 1, 3: rN, 0 1 31 rn x 11 x 2, >- • 43N >- 1 1 X44 • 72" 9.1 Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 l2T 1 m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 1189(9.33),Qvalue=34 m/z 43.0 1• 91 M 1 _ 7 0 0 61El X 11 X >- : 43N >- 4 31 X44• 72N 1 9.1 i Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 AZT I m/7 11 Ref Spec: 36 2-Butanone(MEK) (NIST) 43 o 0 o_ X 72" 57NI ` . 1 I 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 RT Mass Response Amount 9.33 72.00 285 0.017704 9.33 43.00 2904 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 10:53:33 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 159 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:51 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-06.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 17:00:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-1 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-1 Client ID: 5950 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 5 Worklist Smp#: 6 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15LLNJTO3 Limit Group: Al 1015 ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 37 cis-1 ,2-Dichloroethene, CAS: 156-59-2 Processing Results 1 Raw Spec:Scan 1185(9.30) 31 m/z 96.0 1 2 Ifr 0 11 0 21 X X 1 >->- 11 • —43 96N i 9.2 I Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 FT m/7 1 Enhanced Spec:Scan 1185(9.30),Qvalue=l m/z 98.0 1 ac 0 11 c X X all >- >- • v43 96' I 1 i 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 9.2 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec:i 7 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene (NIST) 61 0 0 96N 6 60Nv63 471148 , I I . . i i . I i 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 RT Mass Response Amount 9.30 96.00 164 0.004798 9.29 98.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 10:53:35 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 160 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:51 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 �. User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-06.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 17:00:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-1 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-1 Client ID: 5950 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 5 Worklist Smp#: 6 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AI_TO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 38 Tetrahydrofuran, CAS: 109-99-9 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 1265(9.73) m/z 42.0 1: 79 3: 0 1 31 rn x i 49N 130" X 2, } 1: 128' } 1 42 X51 95N X _ III 1132 ` 9.5 9.8 Min 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 pr m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 1265(9.73),Qvalue=1 m/z 72.0 1: 79 0 1 lic X 1 49N 130 } 128" • 42 51 95N 132X � IIII II II , 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 9.5 9.8 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 38 Tetrahydrofuran (NIST) o 0 _o X • 72N -43 I h. i 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 RT Mass Response Amount 9.73 42.00 268 0.009280 9.68 72.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 10:53:41 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 161 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:51 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 ` User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-06.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 17:00:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-1 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-1 Client ID: 5950 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 5 Worklist Smp#: 6 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15LLNJTO3 Limit Group: AlTO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 42 1 ,1 ,1-Trichloroethane, CAS: 71-55-6 Processing Results 1 Raw Spec:Scan 1312(9.98) m/z 97.0 3: O0 0 1 31 0 0 11 0 2� X X } >- 1: : 1 744 7997� 9.9 ` Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 ['ll- 1 mh 1 Enhanced Spec:Scan 1312(9.98),Qvalue=l m/z 99.0` 31 \V 1 2 0 0 1i 0 2S X x IF > } 1 1i 44 7997� i 9.9 ` Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 FT I m/7 11 Ref Spec: 42 1,1,1-Trichloroethane (NIST) m/z 61.0 97 ,' _ E C _o X x 61 } • i I I 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 9.9 Min RT Mass Response Amount 9.98 97.00 507 0.009339 9.99 99.00 0 9.99 61.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 10:54:19 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 162 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:51 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-06.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 17:00:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-1 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-1 Client ID: 5950 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 5 Worklist Smp#: 6 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 r Method: TO15LLNJTO3 Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 48 n-Heptane, CAS: 142-82-5 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 1456(10.75) m/z 43.0 o 1, 40 3• 0 1 31 0 0 X 11 X 2, >- 1' 44N 1 71 I 10.7 Min 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 FT 1 m/7 Amdis Enhanced Spec:Scan 1456(10.75),Qvalue=71 m/z 71.0 91 43 2 71" o X 6 7: X 11Bal >- 5 >- 11 3' 57N 2: 1 1 10.7 1 Min 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 VT I m/7 11 Ref Spec: 48 n-Heptane (NIST) 43 0 0 j ' 41" 57N 71" 391 56N 701 1 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 RT Mass Response Amount 10.75 43.00 199 0.004025 10.75 71.00 316 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 10:54:58 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 163 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:51 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 Manual Integration/User Assign Peak Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-06.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 17:00:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-1 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-1 Client ID: 5950 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 5 Worklist Smp#: 6 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_T03 Limit Group: AITO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 ( 0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 53 Trichloroethene, CAS: 79-01-6 Signal: 1 Processing Integration Results Not Detected mlz 95.0 Expected RT: 11.44 3 31 2 2, `-3 21 x >- 1: 1 1 11.1 11.3 11.5 11.7 Min Manual Integration Results RT: 11.44 m/z 95.0 Area: 727 33.. Amount: 0.016923 Amount Units: ppb v/v 30 • 27- 24- 21- • x 18- 15- 12- 5. 8' 3 0 i I ... 1 i 11.1 11.3 11.5 11.7 Min RT I I Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 10:55:04 Audit Action: Manually Integrated Audit Reason:Assign Peak Page 164 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:51 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\Chrom Data\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-06.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 17:00:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-1 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-1 Client ID: 5950 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 5 Worklist Smp#: 6 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 60 cis-1 ,3-Dichloropropene, CAS: 10061-01-5 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 1838(12.79) m/z 75.0 i rn 1, 40 co 41 N 01 0 0 3 X11 X 2, 11 44N 75N • 391 177 ` 12.6 12.9 Min 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 RT 1 m1, Enhanced Spec:Scan 1838(12.79),Qvalue=1 m/z 110.0 1, 40 0 1 E ill X 1 1 X >- 44N 75N • 391177 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 12.6 12.9 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 60 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene (NIST) 75 o 0 39N x 49N '-77 i 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 RT Mass Response Amount 12.79 75.00 676 0.012928 12.79 110.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 10:55:40 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 165 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:51 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-06.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 17:00:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-1 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-1 Client ID: 5950 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 5 Worklist Smp#: 6 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJTO3 Limit Group: AlTO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 61 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK), CAS: 108-10-1 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 1873(12.98) m/z 43.0 35 1 2 0 1 25 X _ Y c >- 1 15 • 43N 44• 12.8 Min 13.1 i 40 42 44 46 48 50 FT 1 m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 1873(12.98),Qvalue=1 m/z 58.0 1 >. o jCc) 1 1 X c >- • 43N 44� ` I f 1 40 42 44 46 48 50 12.8 13.1 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 61 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) (NIST) 43 0 0 o_ X i 40 42 44 46 48 50 RT Mass Response Amount 12.98 43.00 511 0.008922 12.93 58.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 10:55:48 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 166 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:51 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-06.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 17:00:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-1 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-1 Client ID: 5950 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 5 Worklist Smp#: 6 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AlTO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 66 trans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene, CAS: 10061-02-6 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 1986(13.58) m/z 75.0 / rn 1, 40 � 3 — 1 M 0 0 2i x 1s '> 21 — } >- 1, • X44 75N 2071 13.4 13.7 Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 IRT I mh i Enhanced Spec:Scan 1986(13.58),Qvalue=1 m/z 110.0 1, 40 _ >. 0 1 c _oElal >< 11 >- >- •X44 75N 2071 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 13.4 13.7 m!7 Min 1 Ref Spec: 66 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene (NIST) 75 0 0 0 X /49 /77 110" X112 I. J.I5 ..73I.I I. _.._ .i.�_ c 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 RT Mass Response Amount 13.58 75.00 445 0.009237 13.58 110.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 10:55:53 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 167 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:51 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 Manual Integration/User Assign Peak Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-06.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 17:00:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-1 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-1 Client ID: 5950 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 5 Worklist Smp#: 6 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL ` Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 68 Tetrachloroethene, CAS: 127-18-4 Signal: 1 Processing Integration Results RT: 13.9960- m/z 166.0 Area: 587 m Amount: 0.008877 56- Amount Units: ppb v/v 52 • - 48- 44- 40- • 36- • } 3r 28- 24' 20- 16- 12- S 4 0 I i 13.7 13.9 14.1 14.3 Min Manual Integration Results RT: 13.99 60- m/z 166.0 Area: 1150 5 Amount: 0.017390 55- Amount o-Amount Units: ppb v/v 50- 45- 40- O 3o- 30- .j >- 25- • 20- 15- 10- 5 0 13.7 13.9 14.1 14.3 Min RT I I Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 10:56:26 Audit Action: Manually Integrated Audit Reason: Assign Peak Page 168 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:51 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-06.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 17:00:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-1 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-1 Client ID: 5950 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 5 Worklist Smp#: 6 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 ( 0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 69 2-Hexanone, CAS: 591-78-6 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 2093(14.15) m/z 43.0 1: 5, o 1, 149N 4 01 0 0 3: x 1i133N x >- — 2 X43 1. 14.0 14.3 i Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 FT I mh Amdis Enhanced Spec:Scan 2093(14.15),Qvalue=52 m/z 58.0 91 133 149 31 1 E 0 7: 0 2 r • x6X 1: >- 5 >- 1 3• 2: 1 i 581 � 1 � 14.0 14.3 67 G I I Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 KT I m/7 11 Ref Spec: 69 2-Hexanone (NIST) 0 0 58N o_ X 57N II ,. 39� 85 100I. 40 60 80 100 120 140 RT Mass Response Amount 14.15 43.00 839 0.015755 14.11 58.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 10:56:50 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 169 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:51 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-06.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 17:00:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-1 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-1 Client ID: 5950 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 5 Worklist Smp#: 6 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 ._ Method: TO15_LLNJ_T03 Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 76 m-Xylene & p-Xylene, CAS: 179601-23-1 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 2333(15.43) m/z 106.0 21 91 11 01: o 0 0 X1 X i } 1 >-r X44 77� 105 ` 65 I I 15.3 15.6 Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 104 108 Fr I mh Enhanced Spec:Scan 2333(15.43),Qvalue=0 m/z 91.0 i 21 91 21 M 0 1: 0 1: MN0 X 1 ;-<- ,,._„ 1 } 1 106 } •c • ,44 77� 105 ` 65NI I I 15.3 Min 15.6 : 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 104 108 42T I m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 15.43 106.00 1310 0.022437 15.43 91.00 4281 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 10:57:31 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 170 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:51 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 Manual Integration/User Assign Peak Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-06.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 17:00:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-1 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-1 Client ID: 5950 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 5 Worklist Smp#: 6 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: Al_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 83 1 ,1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane, CAS: 79-34-5 Signal: 1 Processing Integration Results Not Detected11 m/z 83.0 Expected RT: 16.76 11 X v � } • • El21 16.4 16.6 16.8 17.0 Min Manual Integration Results RT: 16.7711_ m/z 83.0 Area: 2157 h Amount: 0.024190 1Q- Amount Units: ppb v/v g • : • X g >- 5- • 3 / t 0 16.4 16.6 16.8 17.0 Min RT Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 10:57:56 Audit Action: Manually Integrated Audit Reason:Assign Peak Page 171 of 407 3/7/2019 ril FORM I AIR - GC/MS VOA ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: TestAmerica Burlington Job No. : 200-47377-1 SDG No. : Client Sample ID: 4951 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-2 <'. ` ` Matrix: Air Lab File ID: 34571-07.D Analysis Method: TO-15 Date Collected: 02/12/2019 00:00 Sample wt/vol: 200 (mL) Date Analyzed: 02/13/2019 17:52 Soil Aliquot Vol: Dilution Factor: 1 Soil Extract Vol. : GC Column: RTX-624 ID: 0.32 (mm) Moisture: Level: (low/med) Low Analysis Batch No. : 139960 Units: ppb v/v CAS NO. COMPOUND NAME RESULT Q RL RL 115-07-1 Propylene 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 75-71-8 Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-45-6 Freon 22 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 76-14-2 1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 74-87-3 Chloromethane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 106-97-8 n-Butane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-01-4 Vinyl chloride 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 106-99-0 1,3-Butadiene 0.20 U 0.20 0.201111 74-83-9 Bromomethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-00-3 Chloroethane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 593-60-2 Bromoethene(Vinyl Bromide) 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-69-4 Trichlorofluoromethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 64-17-5 Ethanol 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 76-13-1 Freon TF 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-35-4 1,1-Dichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 67-64-1 Acetone 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 67-63-0 Isopropyl alcohol 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 75-15-0 Carbon disulfide 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 107-05-1 3-Chloropropene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-09-2 Methylene Chloride 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-65-0 tert-Butyl alcohol 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 1634-04-4 Methyl tert-butyl ether 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 156-60-5 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 110-54-3 n-Hexane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-34-3 1,1-Dichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-05-4 Vinyl acetate 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 141-78-6 Ethyl acetate 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 78-93-3 Methyl Ethyl Ketone 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 156-59-2 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 540-59-0 1,2-Dichloroethene, Total 0.40 U 0.40 0.40 67-66-3 Chloroform 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 109-99-9 Tetrahydrofuran 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 71-55-6 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 110-82-7 Cyclohexane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 56-23-5 Carbon tetrachloride 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 540-84-1 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 FORM I TO-15 Page 172 of 407 3/7/2019 k, FORM I AIR - GC/MS VOA ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: TestAmerica Burlington Job No. : 200-47377-1 SDG No. : Client Sample ID: 4951 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-2E Matrix: Air Lab File ID: 34571-07.D Analysis Method: TO-15 Date Collected: 02/12/2019 00:00 Sample wt/vol: 200 (mL) Date Analyzed: 02/13/2019 17:52 Soil Aliquot Vol: Dilution Factor: 1 Soil Extract Vol. : GC Column: RTX-624 ID: 0.32 (mm) % Moisture: Level: (low/med) Low Analysis Batch No. : 139960 Units: ppb v/v CAS NO. COMPOUND NAME RESULT Q RL RL 71-43-2 Benzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 107-06-2 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 142-82-5 n-Heptane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 . ' . 79-01-6 Trichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 80-62-6 Methyl methacrylate 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 78-87-5 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 123-91-1 1,4-Dioxane 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 75-27-4 Bromodichloromethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 10061-01-5 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-10-1 methyl isobutyl ketone 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 108-88-3 Toluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 10061-02-6 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 79-00-5 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 127-18-4 Tetrachloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 591-78-6 Methyl Butyl Ketone (2-Hexanone) 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 124-48-1 Dibromochloromethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 106-93-4 1,2-Dibromoethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-90-7 Chlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 100-41-4 Ethylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 179601-23-1 m,p-Xylene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 95-47-6 Xylene, o- 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 1330-20-7 Xylene (total) 0.70 U 0.70 0.70 100-42-5 Styrene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-25-2 Bromoform 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 98-82-8 Cumene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 79-34-5 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 103-65-1 n-Propylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 622-96-8 4-Ethyltoluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-67-8 1,3,5-Trimethy1benzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 95-49-8 2-Chlorotoluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 98-06-6 tert-Butylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 95-63-6 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 135-98-8 sec-Butylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 99-87-6 4-Isopropyltoluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 541-73-1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 106-46-7 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 FORM I TO-15 Page 173 of 407 3/7/2019 r' FORM I AIR - GC/MS VOA ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: TestAmerica Burlington Job No. : 200-47377-1 SDG No. : Client Sample ID: 4951 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-2 '-:1 Matrix: Air Lab File ID: 34571-07.D Analysis Method: TO-15 Date Collected: 02/12/2019 00:00 Sample wt/vol: 200 (mL) Date Analyzed: 02/13/2019 17:52 Soil Aliquot Vol: Dilution Factor: 1 Soil Extract Vol. : GC Column: RTX-624 ID: 0.32 (mm) 1- Moisture: Level: (low/med) Low Analysis Batch No. : 139960 Units: ppb v/v CAS NO. COMPOUND NAME RESULT Q RL RL 100-44-7 Benzyl chloride 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 104-51-8 n-Butylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 95-50-1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 4' 120-82-1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 4 87-68-3 Hexachlorobutadiene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 91-20-3 Naphthalene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 I FORM I TO-15 Page 174 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:53 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 ,, TestAmerica Burlington Target Compound Quantitation Report Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-07.D Lims ID: 200-47377-A-2 Client ID: 4951 Sample Type: Client Inject. Date: 13-Feb-2019 17:52:30 ALS Bottle#: 6 Worklist Smp#: 7 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Sample Info: 200-0034571-007 Misc. Info.: 47377-02 Operator ID: ggg Instrument ID: CHB.i Method: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\TO15_LLNJT03.m Limit Group: Al_TO15_ICAL Last Update: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:35 Calib Date: 13-Feb-2019 03:59:30 Integrator: RTE ID Type: Deconvolution ID Quant Method: Internal/External Standard Quant By: Initial Calibration Last ICal File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190212-34558.b\34558-14.D Column 1 : RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Det: MS SCAN Process Host: CTX0307 First Level Reviewer: bunmaa Date: 14-Feb-2019 11:03:50 RT Adj RT Dlt RT OnCol Amt Compound Sig (min.) (min.) (min.) Q Response ppb v/v Flags 1 Propene 41 3.135 ND 2 Dichlorodifluoromethane 85 3.193 ND 0 3 Chlorodifluoromethane 51 3.231 NDea 4 1,2-Dichloro-1,1,2,2-tetra 85 3.412 ND 5 Chloromethane 50 3.535 ND 6 Butane 43 3.711 ND 7 Vinyl chloride 62 3.743 ND 8 Butadiene 54 3.807 ND 10 Bromomethane 94 4.463 ND 11 Chloroethane 64 4.693 ND 13 Vinyl bromide 106 5.099 ND 14 Trichlorofluoromethane 101 5.205 ND 16 Ethanol 45 5.659 ND 19 1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trif 101 6.225 ND 20 1,1-Dichloroethene 96 6.294 ND 21 Acetone 43 6.438 ND MU 22 Isopropyl alcohol 45 6.668 ND 23 Carbon disulfide 76 6.721 ND U 24 3-Chloro-1-propene 41 6.988 ND 27 Methylene Chloride 49 7.244 ND U 28 2-Methyl-2-propanol 59 7.367 ND 29 Methyl tert-butyl ether 73 7.602 ND 30 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 61 7.655 ND 32 Hexane 57 7.986 7.986 0.000 87 6547 0.1319 33 1,1-Dichloroethane 63 8.391 ND 34 Vinyl acetate 43 8.402 ND 36 2-Butanone(MEK) 72 9.277 ND 37 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 96 9.293 ND 35 Ethyl acetate 88 9.293 ND * 39 Chlorobromomethane 128 9.651 9.662 -0.011 79 275676 10.0 38 Tetrahydrofuran 42 9.678 ND Page 175 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:53 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-07.D RT Adj RT Dlt RT OnCol Amt Compound Sig (min.) (min.) (min.) Q Response ppb v/v Flags 40 Chloroform 83 9.736 ND 42 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 97 9.992 ND S 41 1,2-Dichloroethene, Total 61 10.000 ND 43 Cyclohexane 84 10.014 ND ` 44 Carbon tetrachloride 117 10.201 ND 45 Isooctane 57 10.489 ND 46 Benzene 78 10.526 ND MU 471,2-Dichloroethane 62 10.622 ND 48 n-Heptane 43 10.740 ND * 501,4-Difluorobenzene 114 11.060 11.065 -0.005 93 1203920 10.0 53 Trichloroethene 95 11.439 ND 54 1,2-Dichloropropane 63 11.802 ND 55 Methyl methacrylate 69 11.839 ND 56 1,4-Dioxane 88 11.930 ND 57 Dibromomethane 174 11.988 ND 58 Dichlorobromomethane 83 12.159 ND 60 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 75 12.789 ND 61 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK 43 12.933 ND 64 Toluene 92 13.221 ND 66 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 75 13.579 ND 67 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 83 13.851 ND 68 Tetrachloroethene 166 13.995 ND 69 2-Hexanone 43 14.113 ND 70 Chlorodibromomethane 129 14.406 ND 71 Ethylene Dibromide 107 14.609 ND * 72 Chlorobenzene-d5 117 15.169 15.175 -0.006 83 1044683 10.0 73 Chlorobenzene 112 15.212 ND 74 Ethylbenzene 91 15.281 15.281 0.000 94 4692 0.0356 a 76 m-Xylene& p-Xylene 106 15.431 ND U 78 o-Xylene 106 15.943 ND 79 Styrene 104 15.964 ND S 77 Xylenes, Total 106 16.000 ND 80 Bromoform 173 16.258 ND 81 Isopropylbenzene 105 16.354 ND 83 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 83 16.760 ND 84 N-Propylbenzene 91 16.840 ND U 87 4-Ethyltoluene 105 16.962 ND U 88 2-Chlorotoluene 91 17.005 ND U 89 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 105 17.032 ND U 91 tert-Butylbenzene 119 17.400 ND 92 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 105 17.475 ND U 93 sec-Butylbenzene 105 17.662 ND U 94 4-lsopropyltoluene 119 17.811 ND 95 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 146 17.886 ND 96 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 146 17.998 ND 97 Benzyl chloride 91 18.147 ND U 99 n-Butylbenzene 91 18.318 ND 100 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 146 18.484 ND MU 103 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 180 20.826 ND 104 Hexachlorobutadiene 225 20.997 ND U 105 Naphthalene 128 21.296 ND Page 176 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:53 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 QC Flag Legend Review Flags M - Manually Integrated U - Marked Undetected a - User Assigned ID fi Reagents: ATTO15BISs_00007 Amount Added: 20.00 Units: mL Run Reagent Page 177 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date:14-Feb-2019 10:38:53 Chrom Revision:2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 TestAmerica Burlington f, ;< Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-07.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 17:52:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Operator ID: ggg Lims ID: 200-47377-A-2 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-2 Worklist Smp#: 7 Client ID: 4951 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil.Factor: 1.0000 ALS Bottle#: 6 I* Method: TO15LLNJTO3 Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column:RTX-624(0.32 mm) Y Scaling:Method Defined:Scale to the Nth Largest Target: 1 wav 1• 34571-07[MS SCAN Chro]:Total Mil F Qo 1: wi 1 d c N 1: m 1 a I U L • 1• N c N 1 2 O rr 1 _ o O O 0 11 O N x 1ico L } y t < O E O • O III L U • t■ II NII • II I ILLN1I I I All III I 1W III 1111•JI I JI II II HI IMI II II I I Al 11 II II III I III dl I••II I III•u un It IR WI •I I ILA•I •I 11 •11h1 I •I ■ Q, i 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 Min Page 178 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:53 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 r User Disabled Compound Report , TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-07.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 17:52:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-2 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-2 Client ID: 4951 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 6 Worklist Smp#: 7 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 X' Method: TO15_LLNJTO3 Limit Group: Al_TO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 21 Acetone, CAS: 67-64-1 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 659(6.50) m/z 43.0 61 N. 1, a) v 0 1 51 ;-< 11 X 41 31 >- -->- 43 21 X44 11 • 58' 6.3 i Min 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 VT I m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 659(6.50),Qvalue=11 m/z 58.0 1, 2 \- / 0 1 21 gra o oEl x 1i x 1 >- >- 11 43" • 44 I — 581 i 6.3 i Min 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 RT I m/7 11 Ref Spec: 21 Acetone (NIST) 43 o 0 _o X 58" 42) i ' ' 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 RT Mass Response Amount 6.50 43.00 767 0.025994 6.44 58.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:00:24 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 179 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:53 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-07.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 17:52:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-2 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-2 Client ID: 4951 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 6 Worklist Smp#: 7 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: T015_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 23 Carbon disulfide, CAS: 75-15-0 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 701(6.72) m/z 76.0 1 2 0 11 21 0 0 x 1 } } 11 • 44N 76" 6.6 Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 FT m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 701(6.72),Qvalue=3 1 0 11 >- X • 44N 761 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 m/7 11 Ref Spec: 23 Carbon disulfide (NIST) 76 0 0 o_ X 44N I 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 RT Mass Response Amount 6.72 76.00 165 0.002178 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:00:31 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 180 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:53 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report `, TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-07.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 17:52:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-2 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-2 Client ID: 4951 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 6 Worklist Smp#: 7 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AI_TO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 27 Methylene Chloride, CAS: 75-09-2 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 799(7.24) m/z 49.0 1 31 011 2, 0 0 XX 12 >- >- 1 44N 49' 84' I'86 6 7.1 7.4 6 Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 pr 1 m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 799(7.24),Qvalue=1 m/z 84.0 .1- 1 1 31 v 0 11 El2 0 X 21 >- > 1 11 44N 49N 84" 186 6 7.1 7.4 6 Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 FT i m17 11 Ref Spec: 27 Methylene Chloride (NIST) 2 m/z 86.0 49 ./ 21 o 0 1: o0 84" x x 1 r X86 X51 • 47Ni 6 I . I 7.1 7.4 6 Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 (3T 1 RT Mass Response Amount 7.24 49.00 321 0.011999 7.24 84.00 271 7.25 86.00 140 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:00:36 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 181 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:53 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-07.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 17:52:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-2 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-2 Client ID: 4951 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 6 Worklist Smp#: 7 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: T015_LLNJ_103 Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 46 Benzene, CAS: 71-43-2 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 1413(10.52) 1 m/z 78.0 N 1 I 7811 0 011 0 o_ o XX • 44 51 G 10.3 10.6 ` Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 FT i mb Amdis Enhanced Spec:Scan 1413(10.52),Qvalue=85 m/z 77.0 91 78 21 7: 1: 0 mos 0 X 6 x 1 >- 5 } 3• 2; 51� G 1 77N1 10.3 10.6 ` Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 FT 1 m/7 11 Ref Spec: 46 Benzene (NIST) 78 0 0 0 X 77� 51' X52 38"i I I . 76,Ni 79 1 . I I i . 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 RT Mass Response Amount 10.52 78.00 2776 0.031786 10.53 77.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:01:29 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 182 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:54 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 ili Manual Integration/User Assign Peak Report 4_ TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-07.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 17:52:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-2 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-2 Client ID: 4951 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 6 Worklist Smp#: 7 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 74 Ethylbenzene, CAS: 100-41-4 Signal: 1 Processing Integration Results RT: 15.17 24- m/z 91.0 Area: 2379 Amount: 0.018056 22- Amount Units: ppb v/v 20- 18- i o 1 6 o r X 14- } 12- 10- • • a- .•.•.•. \ MI} i 6 , 14.8 15.0 15.2 15.4 15.6 LA I Manual Integration Results RT: 15.28 24 m/z 91.0 Area: 4692 N Amount: 0.035612 22Lri - Amount Units: ppb v/v 20- 18- 18- _0 14- x 12- 10- 8' B 4- 11\ 0 t 1 1 1 I I 14.8 15.0 15.2 15.4 15.6 Min RT I i Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:02:06 Audit Action:Assigned Compound ID Audit Reason: Assign Peak Page 183 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:54 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-07.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 17:52:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-2 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-2 Client ID: 4951 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 6 Worklist Smp#: 7 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 76 m-Xylene & p-Xylene, CAS: 179601-23-1 Processing Results 2 Raw Spec:Scan 2305(15.28) m/z 106.0 91 21 >. 0 1it•-_--•c o 1 X >- 1 >- 106N 117' I44 1(51 65N1 II2 I I i t I t 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 104 108 112 116 120 15.3 15.6 m/7 Min 2, Enhanced Spec:Scan 2305(15.28),Qvalue=0 m/z 91.0 91 1' 21 o f o X 1• X >_ 1 } 106' 117N • I'44 1(51 65j 112\1 I 15.3 15.6 i Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 104 108 112 116 120 RT I m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 15.28 106.00 1294 0.024476 15.28 91.00 4692 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:02:10 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 184 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:54 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-07.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 17:52:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-2 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-2 Client ID: 4951 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 6 Worklist Smp#: 7 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: 1015LLNJT03 Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 ( 0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 84 N-Propylbenzene, CAS: 103-65-1 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 2598(16.85) m/z 9 .0 1: 3: 1 31 0 X 1 X 2, - 1: 1 ' 207" ' X44 911 195 253116.7 17.0 ` Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 FT I m/7 Amdis Enhanced Spec:Scan 2598(16.85),Qvalue=89 m/z 120.0 91 91 _> 7: c • O X 6 X } 5 >- 3,3• 2: v95 751 174NI 1 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 16.7 17.0 m/7 Min 1 Ref Spec: 84 N-Propylbenzene (NIST) m/z 92.0 91 C O O X 120N 65"' X92 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 16.7 17.0 Min RT Mass Response Amount 16.85 91.00 447 0.002666 16.84 120.00 0 16.84 92.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:02:25 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 185 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:54 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-07.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 17:52:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-2 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-2 Client ID: 4951 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 6 Worklist Smp#: 7 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AlTO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 87 4-Ethyltoluene, CAS: 622-96-8 Processing Results 1 Raw Spec:Scan 2618(16.95) 3; m/z 105.0 i0 rn 1 31 0 11 0 2, X x 1: >- >- 1 X44 207N 105 i 16.9 i Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 ¢T i m/7 1 Enhanced Spec:Scan 2618(16.95),Qvalue=1 m/z 120.0 1 T E 0 11 'S 110 X >- >- 744 207" 105"' i 1 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 16.9 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec 87 4-Ethyltoluene (NIST) 105 0 c3 o 120N 77"' 91"' 7106 i..- ..,..�.i ISI- 1103 -.L�. i.- i 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 RT Mass Response Amount 16.95 105.00 80 0.000565 16.96 120.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:02:35 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 186 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:54 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-07.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 17:52:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-2 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-2 Client ID: 4951 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 6 Worklist Smp#: 7 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15LLNJTO3 Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 89 1 ,3,5-Trimethylbenzene, CAS: 108-67-8 Processing Results 1 Raw Spec:Scan 2632(17.03) m/z 105.0 N 1, 2 0 1 0 21 x 11 '>—< 1 >- > 11 • —44 731 1051 207" i — 16.9 Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 FT I m/7 a 1: Enhanced Spec:Scan 2632(17.03),Qvalue=1 2 m/z 120.0 _ 1' 21I 01 0 0 1: 1112 X 11 X 1 >- >- • -44 73I 1051 2071 s 16.9 i Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 FT I m/7 11 Ref Spec: 891,3,5-Trimethylbenzene (NIST) 105 00 120 0 X ; 119N ` .i. 1., . .... 77 .11I 91-11211.1. ....I 09 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 RT Mass Response Amount 17.03 105.00 159 0.001381 17.03 120.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:02:41 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 187 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:54 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-07.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 17:52:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-2 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-2 Client ID: 4951 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 6 Worklist Smp#: 7 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 88 2-Chlorotoluene, CAS: 95-49-8 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 2598(16.85) m/z 91.0 1: 2 1 21 0 0 X 1 X 1 } ` >- 11 207N X44 91 ' 1 95 253N1 16.9 17.2 Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 FT m/7 Amdis Enhanced Spec:Scan 2598(16.85),Qvalue=80 m/z 63.0 91 91/ 7: 6 >- 5 >- 3' 2: v95 75�I 1 1741 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 16.9 17.2 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 88 2-Chlorotoluene (NIST) 91 126N 631�1 _i�_36\.IIi 65 90NIJ�89 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 RT Mass Response Amount 16.85 91.00 447 0.003899 17.01 63.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:02:38 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 188 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:54 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-07.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 17:52:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-2 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-2 Client ID: 4951 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 6 Worklist Smp#: 7 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15LLNJTO3 Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 92 1 ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene, CAS: 95-63-6 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 2717(17.48) 3s m/z 105.0 1, 31 01 o _c 2, X 11 X 1: 207 1 • r44 105 i 17.3 17.6 i Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 i2T 1 mh Enhanced Spec:Scan 2717(17.48),Qvalue=1 m/z 120.0 1, -3-", -,5- 1 c O C X 11X Ell >- >- 207 r44 105 i 1 i I 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 17.3 17.6 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 921,2,4-Trimethylbenzene (NIST) 105 0 0 _ iO X 120 77� 911.106 N 119 ,139 IIii104 I L- ,..IIL- --. -- ,I�� Li_I I. i 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 RT Mass Response Amount 17.48 105.00 366 0.003230 17.47 120.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:02:48 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 189 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:54 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 r$ User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-07.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 17:52:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-2 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-2 Client ID: 4951 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 6 Worklist Smp#: 7 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AlTO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 93 sec-Butylbenzene, CAS: 135-98-8 Processing Results 16 Raw Spec:Scan 2750(17.66) m/z 105 0 31 �n 1, ° 2 0 0 1 0 21 x 11 x r 1 X44 11 207N ' 105N 17.5 17.8 Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Fr i m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 2750(17.66),Qvalue=1 m/z 134.0 1: 1, -3", 0 1 c 11 E c X 11 X >- >- 44 ' 207N 105' 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 17.5 17.8 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 93 sec-Butylbenzene (NIST) m/z 91.0 105 a • c o 0 o_ X x } 77N 91\ 134 N X106 ' I.. .il. 103 -.L�. I. 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 17.5 17.8 Min RT Mass Response Amount 17.66 105.00 322 0.001861 17.66 134.00 0 17.66 91.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:02:51 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 190 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:54 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-07.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 17:52:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-2 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-2 Client ID: 4951 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 6 Worklist Smp#: 7 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: Al_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 97 Benzyl chloride, CAS: 100-44-7 Processing Results 1 Raw Spec:Scan 2875(18.32) m/z 91 0 1 3 D 11 0 2: X x 21 } 207N >-' 1 91N '-44 '-92 i 18.0 18.3 Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 FT i m/7 Amdis Enhanced Spec:Scan 2875(18.32),Qvalue=87 m/z 126.0 91 91/ • o X 6 X } 5 >- 3'3• 2: X92 1 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 18.0 18.3 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 97 Benzyl chloride (NIST) m/z 65.0 91 O c 0 o X X } 126N 65 � X92 X128 .89 39 �1. .�I,1. ._I, 1. ,�l. 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 18.0 18.3 Min RT Mass Response Amount 18.32 91.00 695 0.007535 18.15 126.00 0 18.15 65.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:03:01 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 191 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:54 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-07.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 17:52:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-2 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-2 Client ID: 4951 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 6 Worklist Smp#: 7 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 ( 0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 100 1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene, CAS: 95-50-1 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 2907(18.49) 7 m/z 146.0 1: 1, 61 0 1 0 4: X1i X 31 r 146" 207N } 2, ' "44 X148 1 i 18.4 i Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 FT 1 m17 Amdis Enhanced Spec:Scan 2907(18.49),Qvalue=88 m/z 111.0 91 146 21 I 7: 1' 00 X 6 "148 X 1III >- 5 } 3' 21 i 1 18.4 i I Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 FT 1 m/7 11 Ref Spec: 100 1,2-Dichlorobenzene (NIST) m/z 140:.0 146 4: o 41 0 o "148 X 3 i -- 2, X >- 1: 111 75Ni 50�Ii .i. ....73�III1. .1.. 'I. 113 IIIA/150 18.4 Min i 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 FT 1 RT Mass Response Amount 18.49 146.00 735 0.008561 18.50 148.00 622 18.48 111.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:03:26 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 192 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:54 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-07.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 17:52:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-2 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-2 Client ID: 4951 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 6 Worklist Smp#: 7 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15LLNJTO3 Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 104 Hexachlorobutadiene, CAS: 87-68-3 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 3374(20.99) 4s m/z 225.0 1 °O 41 C' 0 0 11 (N o_ 0 3 X- • 207N . 2• >- >- i i 1: 44 X225 260N 11227 i 20.8 21.1 Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 wr m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3374(20.99),Qvalue=l m/z 223.0 N. 1 Co 2 °' 0 40N 00 11 0 21 >- • 207N } 1 11 r44 '225 260 227 i 20.8 21.1 i Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 FT { m/7 11 Ref Spec: 104 Hexachlorobutadiene (NIST) 225 0 S 223N '227 X 190N 118N260N i 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 RT Mass Response Amount 20.99 225.00 854 0.012412 20.99 223.00 241 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:03:40 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 193 of 407 3/7/2019 FORM I AIR - GC/MS VOA ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: TestAmerica Burlington Job No. : 200-47377-1 SDG No. : Client Sample ID: 3691 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-3 °i Matrix: Air Lab File ID: 34571-08.D Analysis Method: TO-15 Date Collected: 02/12/2019 00:00 Sample wt/vol: 200 (mL) Date Analyzed: 02/13/2019 18:45 Soil Aliquot Vol: Dilution Factor: 1 Soil Extract Vol. : GC Column: RTX-624 ID: 0.32 (mm) % Moisture: Level: (low/med) Low Analysis Batch No. : 139960 Units: ppb v/v CAS NO. COMPOUND NAME RESULT Q RL RL 115-07-1 Propylene 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 75-71-8 Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-45-6 Freon 22 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 ; 76-14-2 1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 i;. ` 74-87-3 Chloromethane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 106-97-8 n-Butane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-01-4 Vinyl chloride 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 MEM 106-99-0 1,3-Butadiene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 74-83-9 Bromomethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-00-3 Chloroethane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 593-60-2 Bromoethene(Vinyl Bromide) 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-69-4 Trichlorofluoromethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 64-17-5 Ethanol 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 76-13-1 Freon TF 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-35-4 1,1-Dichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 67-64-1 Acetone 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 67-63-0 Isopropyl alcohol 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 75-15-0 Carbon disulfide 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 107-05-1 3-Chloropropene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-09-2 Methylene Chloride 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-65-0 tert-Butyl alcohol 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 1634-04-4 Methyl tert-butyl ether 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 156-60-5 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 110-54-3 n-Hexane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-34-3 l,l-Dichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-05-4 Vinyl acetate 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 141-78-6 Ethyl acetate 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 78-93-3 Methyl Ethyl Ketone 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 156-59-2 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 540-59-0 1,2-Dichloroethene, Total 0.40 U 0.40 0.40 67-66-3 Chloroform 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 109-99-9 Tetrahydrofuran 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 71-55-6 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 110-82-7 Cyclohexane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 56-23-5 Carbon tetrachloride 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 540-84-1 1 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 FORM I TO-15 Page 194 of 407 3/7/2019 FORM I AIR - GC/MS VOA ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: TestAmerica Burlington Job No. : 200-47377-1 O SDG No. : Client Sample ID: 3691 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-3 . Matrix: Air Lab File ID: 34571-08.D Analysis Method: TO-15 Date Collected: 02/12/2019 00:00 Sample wt/vol: 200 (mL) Date Analyzed: 02/13/2019 18:45 Soil Aliquot Vol: Dilution Factor: 1 Soil Extract Vol. : GC Column: RTX-624 ID: 0.32 (mm) Moisture: Level: (low/med) Low Analysis Batch No. : 139960 Units: ppb v/v CAS NO. COMPOUND NAME RESULT Q RL RL 71-43-2 Benzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 107-06-2 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 142-82-5 n-Heptane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 79-01-6 Trichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 -'`." 80-62-6 Methyl methacrylate 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 78-87-5 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 123-91-1 1,4-Dioxane 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 • 75-27-4 Bromodichloromethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20IIII 10061-01-5 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-10-1 methyl isobutyl ketone 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 108-88-3 Toluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 10061-02-6 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 79-00-5 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 127-18-4 Tetrachloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 591-78-6 Methyl Butyl Ketone (2-Hexanone) 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 124-48-1 Dibromochloromethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 106-93-4 1,2-Dibromoethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-90-7 Chlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 100-41-4 Ethylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 179601-23-1 m,p-Xylene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 95-47-6 Xylene, o- 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 1330-20-7 Xylene (total) 0.70 U 0.70 0.70 100-42-5 Styrene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-25-2 Bromoform 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 98-82-8 Cumene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 79-34-5 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 103-65-1 n-Propylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 622-96-8 4-Ethyltoluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-67-8 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 95-49-8 2-Chlorotoluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 98-06-6 tert-Butylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 95-63-6 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 135-98-8 sec-Butylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 99-87-6 4-Isopropyltoluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 541-73-1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 106-46-7 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 FORM I TO-15 Page 195 of 407 3/7/2019 i=. FORM I AIR - GC/MS VOA ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: TestAmerica Burlington Job No. : 200-47377-1 SDG No. : Client Sample ID: 3691 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-3 ¢Alii `` Matrix: Air Lab File ID: 34571-08.D Analysis Method: TO-15 Date Collected: 02/12/2019 00:00 Sample wt/vol: 200 (mL) Date Analyzed: 02/13/2019 18:45 Soil Aliquot Vol: Dilution Factor: 1 Soil Extract Vol. : GC Column: RTX-624 ID: 0.32 (mm) % Moisture: Level: (low/med) Low Analysis Batch No. : 139960 Units: ppb v/v CAS NO. COMPOUND NAME RESULT Q RL RL 100-44-7 Benzyl chloride 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 104-51-8 n-Butylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 95-50-1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 120-82-1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 ' y 87-68-3 Hexachlorobutadiene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 91-20-3 Naphthalene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 4111 FORM I TO-15 Page 196 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:55 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 TestAmerica Burlington Target Compound Quantitation Report Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-08.D Lims ID: 200-47377-A-3 Client ID: 3691 Sample Type: Client Inject. Date: 13-Feb-2019 18:45:30 ALS Bottle#: 7 Worklist Smp#: 8 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Sample Info: 200-0034571-008 Misc. Info.: 47377-03 Operator ID: ggg Instrument ID: CHB.i Method: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\TO15_LLNJ_TO3.m Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Last Update: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:35 Calib Date: 13-Feb-2019 03:59:30 Integrator: RTE ID Type: Deconvolution ID Quant Method: Internal/External Standard Quant By: Initial Calibration Last ICal File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190212-34558.b\34558-14.D Column 1 : RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Det: MS SCAN Process Host: CTX0307 First Level Reviewer: bunmaa Date: 14-Feb-2019 11:08:48 RT Adj RT Dlt RT OnCol Amt Compound Sig (min.) (min.) (min.) Q Response ppb v/v Flags 1 Propene 41 3.135 ND 2 Dichlorodifluoromethane 85 3.193 ND • 3 Chlorodifluoromethane 51 3.231 NDEl 4 1,2-Dichloro-1,1,2,2-tetra 85 3.412 ND 5 Chloromethane 50 3.535 ND 6 Butane 43 3.711 ND 7 Vinyl chloride 62 3.743 ND 8 Butadiene 54 3.807 ND 10 Bromomethane 94 4.463 ND 11 Chloroethane 64 4.693 ND 13 Vinyl bromide 106 5.099 ND 14 Trichlorofluoromethane 101 5.205 ND 16 Ethanol 45 5.659 ND 19 1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trif 101 6.225 ND 20 1,1-Dichloroethene 96 6.294 ND 21 Acetone 43 6.438 ND 22 Isopropyl alcohol 45 6.668 ND 23 Carbon disulfide 76 6.721 ND U 24 3-Chloro-1-propene 41 6.988 ND 27 Methylene Chloride 49 7.244 ND 28 2-Methyl-2-propanol 59 7.367 ND 29 Methyl tert-butyl ether 73 7.602 ND 30 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 61 7.655 ND 32 Hexane 57 7.986 7.986 0.000 90 6105 0.1339 33 1,1-Dichloroethane 63 8.391 ND 34 Vinyl acetate 43 8.402 ND 36 2-Butanone (MEK) 72 9.277 ND 37 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 96 9.293 ND 35 Ethyl acetate 88 9.293 ND * 39 Chlorobromomethane 128 9.656 9.662 -0.006 79 253176 10.0 38 Tetrahydrofuran 42 9.678 ND Page 197 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:55 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-08.D RT Adj RT Dlt RT OnCol Amt Compound Sig (min.) (min.) (min.) Q Response ppb v/v Flags 40 Chloroform 83 9.736 ND 42 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 97 9.992 ND S 41 1,2-Dichloroethene, Total 61 10.000 ND 43 Cyclohexane 84 10.014 ND 44 Carbon tetrachloride 117 10.201 ND 45 Isooctane 57 10.489 ND 46 Benzene 78 10.526 ND 47 1,2-Dichloroethane 62 10.622 ND 48 n-Heptane 43 10.740 ND * 501,4-Difluorobenzene 114 11.060 11.065 -0.005 93 1096594 10.0 53 Trichloroethene 95 11.439 ND 54 1,2-Dichloropropane 63 11.802 ND 55 Methyl methacrylate 69 11.839 ND 56 1,4-Dioxane 88 11.930 ND 57 Dibromomethane 174 11.988 ND MU 58 Dichlorobromomethane 83 12.159 ND 60 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 75 12.789 ND 61 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK 43 12.933 ND 64 Toluene 92 13.221 13.221 0.000 94 1490 0.0252 7M 66 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 75 13.579 ND 67 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 83 13.851 ND 68 Tetrachloroethene 166 13.995 ND 69 2-Hexanone 43 14.113 ND 70 Chlorodibromomethane 129 14.406 ND AP 71 Ethylene Dibromide 107 14.609 ND * 72 Chlorobenzene-d5 117 15.169 15.175 -0.006 83 959983 10.0 73 Chlorobenzene 112 15.212 ND 74 Ethylbenzene 91 15.287 15.281 0.006 92 4262 0.0352 76 m-Xylene& p-Xylene 106 15.431 ND U 78 o-Xylene 106 15.943 15.943 0.000 92 1247 0.0252 7M 79 Styrene 104 15.964 ND S 77 Xylenes, Total 106 0 0.0252 7 80 Bromoform 173 16.258 ND 81 lsopropylbenzene 105 16.354 ND 83 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 83 16.760 ND 84 N-Propylbenzene 91 16.840 ND U 87 4-Ethyltoluene 105 16.962 ND U 88 2-Chlorotoluene 91 17.005 ND 89 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 105 17.032 ND U 91 tert-Butylbenzene 119 17.400 ND 92 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 105 17.475 ND U 93 sec-Butylbenzene 105 17.662 ND U 94 4-Isopropyltoluene 119 17.811 ND 95 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 146 17.886 ND 96 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 146 17.998 ND 97 Benzyl chloride 91 18.147 ND U 99 n-Butylbenzene 91 18.318 ND U 100 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 146 18.484 ND U 103 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 180 20.826 ND 104 Hexachlorobutadiene 225 20.997 ND U 105 Naphthalene 128 21.296 ND MU Page 198 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:55 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 QC Flag Legend Processing Flags 7- Failed Limit of Detection Review Flags M - Manually Integrated U -Marked Undetected Reagents: ATTO15BISs00007 Amount Added: 20.00 Units: mL Run Reagent 4 Page 199 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date:14-Feb-2019 10:38:55 Chrom Revision:2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-08.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 18:45:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Operator ID: ggg Lims ID: 200-47377-A-3 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-3 Worklist Smp#: 8 Client ID: 3691 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil.Factor: 1.0000 ALS Bottle#: 7 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: Al_TO15_ICAL Column:RTX-624(0.32 mm) Y Scaling:Method Defined:Scale to the Nth Largest Target: 1 34571-08[MS SCAN Chro]:Total 18- a, co 17' LO 16- m 15- o S 0 14 v c • 13- 12- 11- v • 10 x } 9 E S } U 4- 1 Ili II•Ilnlut I III 1X11111 I I 1 11 11 I Wlll wl1 l I 11 1111 II IIIc 1111 I 11 I I�IW 11111 I I t U VI II1411AII111 1111111 III II1 MIMI I 11 IIlL I a MI 11 I 111 ILLI■1111 Cr 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 I 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 Min Page 200 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:55 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-08.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 18:45:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-3 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-3 Client ID: 3691 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 7 Worklist Smp#: 8 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15LLNJTO3 Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 23 Carbon disulfide, CAS: 75-15-0 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 702(6.73) 2 m/z 76.0 1, 21 0 1 >- >- • 44N — 761 i 6.6 Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 �T mh Enhanced Spec:Scan 702(6.73),Qvalue=2 1, 0 1 • x 11 >- 44N I 761 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 m17 11 Ref Spec: 23 Carbon disulfide (NIST) 76 44NI� I 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 RT Mass Response Amount 6.73 76.00 141 0.002026 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:05:10 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 201 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:55 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 Manual Integration/User Assign Peak Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-08.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 18:45:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-3 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-3 Client ID: 3691 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 7 Worklist Smp#: 8 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 64 Toluene, CAS: 108-88-3 Signal: 1 Processing Integration Results RT: 13.2275- m/z 92.0 Area: 790 N Amount: 0.013356 70- Amount Units: ppb v/v 65- 60- 55 50- 45- x 40- 30- 30- 25-20- 15- 15- 10- 0 12.9 13.1 13.3 13.5 Min Manual Integration Results RT: 13.22 m/z 92.0 Area: 1490 72- Amount: 0.025190 66- T Amount Units: ppb v/v 60- 54- 48- 0 42- 36- 30- • 24' 18- I 12.9 13.1 13.3 13.5 Min RT I I Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:06:08 Audit Action: Manually Integrated Audit Reason:Assign Peak Page 202 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:55 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-08.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 18:45:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-3 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-3 Client ID: 3691 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 7 Worklist Smp#: 8 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: T015LLNJT03 Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 76 m-Xylene & p-Xylene, CAS: 179601-23-1 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 2305(15.28) m/z 106.0 1: 91 61 .. 0 51 0 1 0 x 1 X 41 >- 31 L 106" 117N 21 • 11 '44 52 82\I I 15.2 15.5 Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 104 108 112 116 120 FT 1 mh Enhanced Spec:Scan 2305(15.28),Qvalue=0 m/z 91.0 1: 91 21 ccoo cNi6 0 0 1: • 1 0 1 0rIE X x 1 106N 117N __44 82� ` u I�52 I I 15.2 15.5 Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 104 108 112 116 120 FT I m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 15.28 106.00 1267 0.026079 15.29 91.00 4262 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:06:28 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 203 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:56 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 Manual Integration/User Assign Peak Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-08.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 18:45:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-3 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-3 Client ID: 3691 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 7 Worklist Smp#: 8 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15LLNJTO3 Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 78 o-Xylene, CAS: 95-47-6 Signal: 1 Processing Integration Results RT: 15.94 m/z 106.0 Area: 981 M 70- Amount: 0.019857 Amount Units: ppb v/v 65 60- 55- 50- 0 45- x } 40' 35- 30- 25" 20- 15- 10- 5. 0 15.6 15.8 16.0 16.2 Min Manual Integration Results RT: 15.94 m/z 106.0 Area: 1247 72- m Amount: 0.025241 66- Amount Units: ppb v/v 60- 54- 48- • . E) 0..54'48- 0 42- x } 36' 30- 24 18- 12- e. 0 1 1 I I 15.6 15.8 16.0 16.2 Min RT Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:06:36 Audit Action: Manually Integrated Audit Reason:Assign Peak Page 204 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:56 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-08.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 18:45:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-3 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-3 Client ID: 3691 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 7 Worklist Smp#: 8 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 84 N-Propylbenzene, CAS: 103-65-1 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 2553(16.60) m/z 91.0 2: 95 2' 2 174 X176 a 21 0 0 0 1: X 21 j< >- 1: j.1 1 75N 50NI 1 7II I 94'I '96 '177 16.6 16.9 ` .u.. ....1I- -�..u'- ..1 i...... 11 -.i I- I Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 FT m/7 Amdis Enhanced Spec:Scan 2553(16.60),Qvalue=36 m/z 120.0 i 91 95 174 \176 a 7: E X 6 j< 133 >- 5 >- 3. 75N 2: 96 1(177 1 ....50.11- .....u. (I..�I�......9I SII/ 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 16.6 16.9 m/7 Min 1 Ref Spec: 84 N-Propylbenzene (NIST) m/z 92.0 1 91 T • C_ O O o X X >- 120' - 65 ..1. 78�I, _..(92 r, i- 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 16.6 16.9 Min RT Mass Response Amount 16.60 91.00 1737 0.011275 16.84 120.00 0 16.62 92.00 16521 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:06:57 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 205 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:56 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-08.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 18:45:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-3 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-3 Client ID: 3691 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 7 Worklist Smp#: 8 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 87 4-Ethyltoluene, CAS: 622-96-8 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 2633(17.03) m/z 105.0 1, 21 a 1 1: o_ o 11 X 1 } • } • N p • • 105 X44 2071 — 16.8 17.1 Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 FT m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 2633(17.03),Qvalue=1 m/z 120.0 1• 0 1 X 11 X • >- >- 144105 2070 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 16.8 17.1 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 87 4-Ethyltoluene (NIST) 105 • 120 77� 91' '106 I... .....LI. -...Id. _..I103 .I,�. 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 RT Mass Response Amount 17.03 105.00 263 0.002020 16.96 120.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:06:59 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 206 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:56 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-08.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 18:45:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-3 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-3 Client ID: 3691 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 7 Worklist Smp#: 8 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AlTO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 89 1 ,3,5-Trimethylbenzene, CAS: 108-67-8 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 2633(17.03) m/z 105.0 3: N 1• CO 0 0 1 31 N X 11 X . >- >- 1 1 1 • 105 44 I 20711 i 16.9 Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Rs I m/7 u Enhanced Spec:Scan 2633(17.03),Qvalue=l m/z 120.0 1, 0 1 0 El,_X 1i X • i 105 44 I 2071 i r I 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 16.9 mh Min 1 Ref Spec: 89,3,5-Trimethylbenzene (NIST) 105 00 120N 0 X 119 77I 91N 121 I. I 09 i 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 RT Mass Response Amount 17.03 105.00 263 0.002485 17.03 120.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:07:03 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 207 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:56 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.)\20190213-34571.b\34571-08.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 18:45:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-3 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-3 Client ID: 3691 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 7 Worklist Smp#: 8 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 , ; Method: TO15LLNJTO3 Limit Group: Al_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 92 1 ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene, CAS: 95-63-6 Processing Results 1 Raw Spec:Scan 2715(17.47) m/z 105.0 1 21 to1 01; 0 11 0 x x 1 744 207N • 1051 i 17.4 ` Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 FT I m/7 1 Enhanced Spec:Scan 2715(17.47),Qvalue=1 m/z 120.0 1 T 5" 1•E 11 c X X >_ } 744 207N 1051 1 1 1 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 17.4 m/7 Min 1 Ref Spec: 921,2,4-Trimethylbenzene (NIST) 105 0 0 0 X 120N PI 91�106 119N i .139)11104 j I- ,..Ill.- ..I,.- . .JI 1. - 1.111 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 RT Mass Response Amount 17.47 105.00 65 0.000624 17.47 120.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:07:07 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 208 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:56 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-08.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 18:45:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-3 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-3 Client ID: 3691 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 7 Worklist Smp#: 8 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 93 sec-Butylbenzene, CAS: 135-98-8 Processing Results 1 Raw Spec:Scan 2749(17.65) m/z 105.0 2' Ln 11 21 N 0 0 0 1: X ; X } 207 y 1 •'-44 • 105" i 17.6 i Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 FT � m/7 .,i 1 Enhanced Spec:Scan 2749(17.65),Qvalue=1 m/z 134.0 11 a o E X X El >- 6 207' >- . . -44 105'' 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 17.6 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 93 sec-Butylbenzene (NIST) m/z 91.0 105 E4,- p o X X } 77� 91\ 134N 11 I103N (106 1, 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 17.6 Min RT Mass Response Amount 17.65 105.00 66 0.000415 17.66 134.00 0 17.66 91.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:07:09 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 209 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:56 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-08.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 18:45:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-3 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-3 Client ID: 3691 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 7 Worklist Smp#: 8 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 97 Benzyl chloride, CAS: 100-44-7 Processing Results 1 Raw Spec:Scan 2843(18.15) m/z 91.0 2 11 '! cp 21 o _o X- x 1 >- 6 } 11 '44 207N 91N 253' i 18.1 i Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 RT I mh 1 Enhanced Spec:Scan 2843(18.15),Qvalue=1 m/z 126.0 11 '' 5. E SIF X X >- i >- r44 207N 91N1 2531 i 1 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 18.1 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 97 Benzyl chloride (NIST) m/z 65.0 91 c o .S 0o X 126N ..L--. .d.65.d.� 89'I1'92 1128 i 1 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 18.1 Min RT Mass Response Amount 18.15 91.00 86 0.001015 18.15 126.00 0 18.15 65.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:07:22 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 210 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:56 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-08.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 18:45:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-3 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-3 Client ID: 3691 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 7 Worklist Smp#: 8 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 99 n-Butylbenzene, CAS: 104-51-8 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 2876(18.33) m/z 91.0 1 12� , 1 0 21 1 _o 0 X 1. } 1 • X44 207N • 91\1 i 18.2 Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 FT m/7 11 Enhanced Spec:Scan 2876(18.33),Qvalue=1 m/z 134.0 1, 0 1 :E • X 11 >- } • X44 207N 911 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 18.2 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 99 n-Butylbenzene (NIST) m/z 92.0 91 E o S0 V92 x >- 134N � 65NI 391h105�I .r.77 .I,... .1.. - . - r i 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 18.2 Min RT Mass Response Amount 18.33 91.00 233 0.001906 18.32 134.00 0 18.32 92.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:07:52 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 211 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:56 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-08.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 18:45:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-3 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-3 Client ID: 3691 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 7 Worklist Smp#: 8 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15LLNJTO3 Limit Group: AI_TO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 100 1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene, CAS: 95-50-1 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 2905(18.48) m/z 146.0 4 M 1, 09 -1- 3 3 _0 1 _a 2: X 11 X - 21 1• 6 '44 207 146 Iv148 i 18.4 I Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 (;2T 1 m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 2905(18.48),Qvalue=1 m/z 111.0 1, T 01 E O III x 11 3 >_ • } V44 207'' 146 1V148 I i 1 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 18.4 m/7 min 11 Ref Spec: 100 1,2-Dichlorobenzene (NIST) m/z 148.0 146 2 21 a o o X148 x 1 X } -- 11 • 111` 75 I 50N '113 '150 18.4 �i-.i. ....73N IIS- w ��. I1�. Min I 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 FT 1 RT Mass Response Amount 18.48 146.00 384 0.004867 18.48 111.00 0 18.49 148.00 224 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:08:05 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 212 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:56 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-08.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 18:45:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-3 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-3 Client ID: 3691 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 7 Worklist Smp#: 8 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_103 Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 104 Hexachlorobutadiene, CAS: 87-68-3 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 3375(20.99) m/z 225.0 1, 11N 1 31 0 2, 0 11 0 x 207N x 1: >- >- 1 • X44 • '225 260" 20.8 21.1 Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 FT I m/7 1 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3375(20.99),Qvalue=1 m/z 223.0 31 12 0 • 0 11 0 21ES } 207" } 1 11 '44 • "225 260" 20.8 21.1 i Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 FT I m17 11 Ref Spec: 104 Hexachlorobutadiene (NIST) 225 0 0 223N '227 X ; 190N • 118N 260N 1 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 RT Mass Response Amount 20.99 225.00 500 0.007908 21.00 223.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:08:20 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 213 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:56 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-08.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 18:45:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-3 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-3 Client ID: 3691 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 7 Worklist Smp#: 8 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 .. Method: TO15LLNJTO3 Limit Group: Al_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 105 Naphthalene, CAS: 91-20-3 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 3435(21.31) m/z 128.0 1 91 • 0 11 7 x • 128 x 61 } 207 4 /44 31 • 1 21.1 21.4 Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 �T mb Enhanced Spec:Scan 3435(21.31),Qvalue=l 1 00 11 x 128' } 207 X44 • 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 mh 11 Ref Spec: 105 Naphthalene (NIST) 128 0 • X 127 X129 51'). 64 II wi ..1021. III. 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 RT Mass Response Amount 21.31 128.00 1013 0.009548 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:08:44 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 214 of 407 3/7/2019 A FORM I AIR - GC/MS VOA ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: TestAmerica Burlington Job No. : 200-47377-1 SDG No. : Client Sample ID: 6322 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-4 611 Matrix: Air Lab File ID: 34571-09.D Analysis Method: TO-15 Date Collected: 02/12/2019 00:00 Sample wt/vol: 200 (mL) Date Analyzed: 02/13/2019 19:37 Soil Aliquot Vol: Dilution Factor: 1 Soil Extract Vol. : GC Column: RTX-624 ID: 0.32 (mm) % Moisture: Level: (low/med) Low Analysis Batch No. : 139960 Units: ppb v/v CAS NO. COMPOUND NAME RESULT Q RL RL 115-07-1 Propylene 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 75-71-8 Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-45-6 Freon 22 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 76-14-2 1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 , 74-87-3 Chloromethane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 106-97-8 n-Butane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-01-4 Vinyl chloride 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 • 106-99-0 1,3-Butadiene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20El 74-83-9 Bromomethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-00-3 Chloroethane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 593-60-2 Bromoethene(Vinyl Bromide) 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-69-4 Trichlorofluoromethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 64-17-5 Ethanol 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 76-13-1 Freon TF 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-35-4 1,1-Dichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 67-64-1 Acetone 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 67-63-0 Isopropyl alcohol 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 75-15-0 Carbon disulfide 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 107-05-1 3-Chloropropene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-09-2 Methylene Chloride 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-65-0 tert-Butyl alcohol 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 1634-04-4 Methyl tert-butyl ether 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 156-60-5 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 110-54-3 n-Hexane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-34-3 1,1-Dichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-05-4 Vinyl acetate 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 141-78-6 Ethyl acetate 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 78-93-3 Methyl Ethyl Ketone 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 156-59-2 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 540-59-0 1,2-Dichloroethene, Total 0.40 U 0.40 0.40 67-66-3 Chloroform 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 109-99-9 Tetrahydrofuran 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 71-55-6 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 110-82-7 Cyclohexane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 56-23-5 Carbon tetrachloride 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 540-84-1 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 FORM I TO-15 Page 215 of 407 3/7/2019 FORM I AIR - GC/MS VOA ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: TestAmerica Burlington Job No. : 200-47377-1 SDG No. : Client Sample ID: 6322 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-4 E '. Matrix: Air Lab File ID: 34571-09.D Analysis Method: TO-15 Date Collected: 02/12/2019 00:00 Sample wt/vol: 200 (mL) Date Analyzed: 02/13/2019 19:37 Soil Aliquot Vol: Dilution Factor: 1 Soil Extract Vol. : GC Column: RTX-624 ID: 0.32 (mm) Moisture: Level: (low/med) Low Analysis Batch No. : 139960 Units: ppb v/v CAS NO. COMPOUND NAME RESULT Q RL RL 71-43-2 Benzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 107-06-2 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 142-82-5 n-Heptane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 79-01-6 Trichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 ' f 80-62-6 Methyl methacrylate 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 78-87-5 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 123-91-1 1,4-Dioxane 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 MEM 75-27-4 Bromodichloromethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 10061-01-5 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-10-1 methyl isobutyl ketone 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 108-88-3 Toluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 10061-02-6 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 79-00-5 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 127-18-4 Tetrachloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 591-78-6 Methyl Butyl Ketone (2-Hexanone) 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 124-48-1 Dibromochloromethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 106-93-4 1,2-Dibromoethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-90-7 Chlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 100-41-4 Ethylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 179601-23-1 m,p-Xylene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 95-47-6 Xylene, o- 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 1330-20-7 Xylene (total) 0.70 U 0.70 0.70 100-42-5 Styrene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-25-2 Bromoform 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 98-82-8 Cumene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 79-34-5 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 103-65-1 n-Propylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 622-96-8 4-Ethyltoluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-67-8 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 95-49-8 2-Chlorotoluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 98-06-6 tert-Butylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 95-63-6 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 135-98-8 sec-Butylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 99-87-6 4-Isopropyltoluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 541-73-1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 106-46-7 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 FORM I TO-15 Page 216 of 407 3/7/2019 FORM I AIR - GC/MS VOA ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: TestAmerica Burlington Job No. : 200-47377-1 SDG No. : Client Sample ID: 6322 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-4 VI 41 4 Matrix: Air Lab File ID: 34571-09.D Analysis Method: TO-15 Date Collected: 02/12/2019 00:00 Sample wt/vol: 200 (mL) Date Analyzed: 02/13/2019 19:37 Soil Aliquot Vol: Dilution Factor: 1 Soil Extract Vol. : GC Column: RTX-624 ID: 0.32 (mm) % Moisture: Level: (low/med) Low Analysis Batch No. : 139960 Units: ppb v/v CAS NO. COMPOUND NAME RESULT Q RL RL 100-44-7 Benzyl chloride 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 104-51-8 n-Butylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 95-50-1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 120-82-1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 87-68-3 Hexachlorobutadiene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 91-20-3 Naphthalene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 al FORM I TO-15 Page 217 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:57 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 TestAmerica Burlington Target Compound Quantitation Report Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-09.D Lims ID: 200-47377-A-4 Client ID: 6322 Sample Type: Client Inject. Date: 13-Feb-2019 19:37:30 ALS Bottle#: 8 Worklist Smp#: 9 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Sample Info: 200-0034571-009 Misc. Info.: 47377-04 Operator ID: ggg Instrument ID: CHB.i Method: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\TO15LLNJ_TO3.m Limit Group: AITO15_ICAL Last Update: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:35 Calib Date: 13-Feb-2019 03:59:30 Integrator: RTE ID Type: Deconvolution ID Quant Method: Internal/External Standard Quant By: Initial Calibration Last ICal File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190212-34558.b\34558-14.D Column 1 : RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Det: MS SCAN Process Host: CTX0307 First Level Reviewer: bunmaa Date: 14-Feb-2019 11:15:19 RT Adj RT Dlt RT OnCol Amt Compound Sig (min.) (min.) (min.) Q Response ppb v/v Flags 1 Propene 41 3.135 ND 2 Dichlorodifluoromethane 85 3.193 ND 3 Chlorodifluoromethane 51 3.231 ND 4 1,2-Dichloro-1,1,2,2-tetra 85 3.412 ND IF 5 Chloromethane 50 3.535 ND 6 Butane 43 3.711 ND 7 Vinyl chloride 62 3.743 ND 8 Butadiene 54 3.807 ND 10 Bromomethane 94 4.463 ND 11 Chloroethane 64 4.693 ND 13 Vinyl bromide 106 5.099 ND 14 Trichlorofluoromethane 101 5.205 ND 16 Ethanol 45 5.659 ND 19 1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trif 101 6.225 ND 20 1,1-Dichloroethene 96 6.294 ND 21 Acetone 43 6.438 ND 22 Isopropyl alcohol 45 6.668 ND 23 Carbon disulfide 76 6.721 ND 24 3-Chloro-1-propene 41 6.988 ND 27 Methylene Chloride 49 7.244 ND MU 28 2-Methyl-2-propanol 59 7.367 ND 29 Methyl tert-butyl ether 73 7.602 ND 30 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 61 7.655 ND 32 Hexane 57 7.986 7.986 0.000 90 5368 0.1309 33 1,1-Dichloroethane 63 8.391 ND 34 Vinyl acetate 43 8.402 ND 36 2-Butanone (MEK) 72 9.277 ND 37 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 96 9.293 ND 35 Ethyl acetate 88 9.293 ND * 39 Chlorobromomethane 128 9.651 9.662 -0.011 82 227742 10.0 38 Tetrahydrofuran 42 9.678 ND Page 218 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:57 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-09.D RT Adj RT Dlt RT OnCol Amt Compound Sig (min.) (min.) (min.) Q Response ppb v/v Flags 40 Chloroform 83 9.736 ND 42 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 97 9.992 ND S 41 1,2-Dichloroethene, Total 61 10.000 ND 43 Cyclohexane 84 10.014 ND 44 Carbon tetrachloride 117 10.201 ND 45 Isooctane 57 10.489 ND 46 Benzene 78 10.515 10.526 -0.011 86 1754 0.0241 7M 47 1,2-Dichloroethane 62 10.622 ND 48 n-Heptane 43 10.740 ND * 50 1,4-Difluorobenzene 114 11.060 11.065 -0.005 93 1004914 10.0 53 Trichloroethene 95 11.439 ND 54 1,2-Dichloropropane 63 11.802 ND 55 Methyl methacrylate 69 11.839 ND 56 1,4-Dioxane 88 11.930 ND 57 Dibromomethane 174 11.988 ND U 58 Dichlorobromomethane 83 12.159 ND 60 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 75 12.789 ND 61 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK 43 12.933 ND 64 Toluene 92 13.232 13.221 0.011 86 1351 0.0251 7M 66 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 75 13.579 ND 67 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 83 13.851 ND 68 Tetrachloroethene 166 13.995 ND 69 2-Hexanone 43 14.113 ND 70 Chlorodibromomethane 129 14.406 ND MI • 71 Ethylene Dibromide 107 14.609 ND * 72 Chlorobenzene-d5 117 15.169 15.175 -0.006 83 873484 10.0 73 Chlorobenzene 112 15.212 ND 74 Ethylbenzene 91 15.281 15.281 0.000 93 3419 0.0310 76 m-Xylene& p-Xylene 106 15.431 ND U 78 o-Xylene 106 15.943 15.943 0.000 93 990 0.0220 7M 79 Styrene 104 15.964 ND S 77 Xylenes, Total 106 0 0.0220 7 80 Bromoform 173 16.258 ND 81 lsopropylbenzene 105 16.354 ND 83 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 83 16.760 ND 84 N-Propylbenzene 91 16.840 ND U 87 4-Ethyltoluene 105 16.962 ND U 88 2-Chlorotoluene 91 17.005 ND 89 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 105 17.032 ND U 91 tert-Butylbenzene 119 17.400 ND 92 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 105 17.475 ND U 93 sec-Butylbenzene 105 17.662 ND U 94 4-Isopropyltoluene 119 17.811 ND 95 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 146 17.886 ND U 96 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 146 17.998 ND U 97 Benzyl chloride 91 18.147 ND 99 n-Butylbenzene 91 18.318 ND 100 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 146 18.484 ND Ua 103 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 180 20.826 ND U 104 Hexachlorobutadiene 225 20.997 ND U 105 Naphthalene 128 21.296 ND U Page 219 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:57 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 QC Flag Legend Processing Flags 7- Failed Limit of Detection Review Flags M - Manually Integrated U -Marked Undetected a - User Assigned ID Reagents: k ' ATTO15BISs_00007 Amount Added: 20.00 Units: mL Run Reagent 'f F, Page 220 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date:14-Feb-2019 10:38:57 Chrom Revision:2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 ; v: TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-09.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 19:37:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Operator ID: ggg Lims ID: 200-47377-A-4 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-4 Worklist Smp#: 9 Client ID: 6322 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil.Factor: 1.0000 ALS Bottle#: 8 Method: T015_LLNJ_103 Limit Group: AI TO15_ICAL — Column:RTX-624(0.32 mm) Y Scaling:Method Defined:Scale to the Nth Largest Target: 1 1 34571-09[MS SCAN Chro]:Total m vi 1: a 1 8 N + 8 N 1- m 0 0 0 1 m U C N N C 1 2 g 1 ..__ 0 Oco 4 0 11 ai O O X• o m L } a E a E 0 0 11113 t U 1!111111101 II II IW 191 11 11IA) 111 W1111 1IIII fill 111111 l O 1 lu W I 11111111/It 10 ❑ MI 11u11HIE 111 II IIIIDDII AI II 1M lull u Ill Y11 u■IIII lull{ i 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 Min Page 221 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:57 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-09.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 19:37:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-4 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-4 Client ID: 6322 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 8 Worklist Smp#: 9 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 ( 0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 27 Methylene Chloride, CAS: 75-09-2 Processing Results 1 Raw Spec:Scan 797(7.23) m/z 49.0 co co 31 (NI 11 CD _ 0 2� X X 1: } i 1 44N 49" 86N 7.1 ` Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 FT 1 m17 1 Enhanced Spec:Scan 797(7.23),Qvalue=1 3C m/z 84.0 co CV 11 I 31 _o s 2. >. r. 1: >- } 1 44N 49N 86'' i 7.1 ` Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 FT 1 m/7 11 Ref Spec: 27 Methylene Chloride (NIST) m/z 86.0 49 2' 21 0 84N X 1: X } 1 X86 • X51 . : 47N I 7.1 I � . i . . I Min i 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 Rs 1 RT Mass Response Amount 7.23 49.00 172 0.007783 7.24 84.00 79 7.24 86.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:10:58 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 222 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:58 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 P Manual Integration/User Assign Peak Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-09.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 19:37:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-4 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-4 Client ID: 6322 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 8 Worklist Smp#: 9 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 c.' Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 46 Benzene, CAS: 71-43-2 Signal: 1 Processing Integration Results RT: 10.54 m/z 78.0 Area: 1071 84- r Amount: 0.014692 78- Amount Units: ppb v/v 72- 66- • 0 54- 48- >- 42- 36- 30- ••••• 24- :•:.: .•.•. •:•:. ; 18- •:•:. 12- (3. 4- 48-} 42- 3B- 30- 24- 18- 12- 6- 0 I 1 1 •. 1 1 I 10.2 10.4 10.6 10.8 Min Manual Integration Results RT: 10.52 m/z 78.0 Area: 1754 84 Amount: 0.024061 78- o Amount Units: ppb v/v 72- 66- :r:- 60- r. 54 �:r:• 0 48- :• -- 42- >- 36- 30- 24- 18- 2-36-30-24'18- :: ::::: 12- 0 1 1 f 1 I 1 10.2 10.4 10.6 10.8 Min RT i Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:11:32 Audit Action: Manually Integrated Audit Reason: Assign Peak Page 223 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:58 Chrom Revision:2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 Manual Integration/User Assign Peak Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-09.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 19:37:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-4 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-4 Client ID: 6322 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 8 Worklist Smp#: 9 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_T03 Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 64 Toluene, CAS: 108-88-3 Signal: 1 Processing Integration Results RT: 13.22 m/z 92.0 Area: 777 65- (.1 Amount: 0.014437 60- Amount Units: ppb v/v 55- 50- 45- (-3 5- 55' 45- 0 40- >_ 35- 30- 25- 20- 1� 10- 0 12.9 13.1 13.3 13.5 Min Manual Integration Results RT: 13.23 m/z 92.0 Area: 1351 65- Amount: 0.025102 60- Amount Units: ppb v/v 55- 50- 45- a 5- 50- 45- 0 40- x 35- • } 30- 25- 20- 15- 10- s 0 I 12.9 13.1 13.3 13.5 Min RT Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:12:09 Audit Action: Manually Integrated Audit Reason: Assign Peak Page 224 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:58 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-09.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 19:37:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-4 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-4 Client ID: 6322 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 8 Worklist Smp#: 9 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: Al_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 76 m-Xylene & p-Xylene, CAS: 179601-23-1 Processing Results 1 Raw Spec:Scan 2306(15.29) m/z 106.0 91 6. 1 5 0 X 1 X 4, - 3 106N 117N 2 s 11 1744 821 15.2 15.5 i Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 104 108 112 116 120 FT i m/7 1 Enhanced Spec:Scan 2306(15.29),Qvalue=0 1 m/z 91.0 91 CO 1 1 00 1 0 c, El x 1 x >_ e >_ 106N 117N • 744 82N1 i 15.2 15.5 i Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 104 108 112 116 120 AZT 1 m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 15.29 106.00 1298 0.029363 15.28 91.00 3419 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:13:42 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 225 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:58 Chrom Revision:2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 Manual Integration/User Assign Peak Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-09.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 19:37:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-4 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-4 Client ID: 6322 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 8 Worklist Smp#: 9 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: Al_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 78 o-Xylene, CAS: 95-47-6 Signal: 1 Processing Integration Results RT: 15.9470- m/z 106.0 Area: 899 m Amount: 0.019999 65- Amount 5Amount Units: ppb v/v 60- 55- 50- 45- 0 X 40 } 35 30- 25- 20- 15- 10' • 15.6 15.8 16.0 16.2 Min Manual Integration Results RT: 15.9470- m/z 106.0 co Area: 990 m 65- Amount: 5Amount: 0.022023 Amount Units: ppb v/v 60 • 55- 50- 45- a 5- 50- 450 40- 35 :. 30- 25 20' 15' 10- 5 0 i I I I 15.6 15.8 16.0 16.2 Min RT Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:13:50 Audit Action: Manually Integrated Audit Reason:Assign Peak Page 226 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:58 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-09.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 19:37:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-4 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-4 Client ID: 6322 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 8 Worklist Smp#: 9 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15LLNJTO3 Limit Group: AlTO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 84 N-Propylbenzene, CAS: 103-65-1 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 2555(16.62) m/z 91.0 31 Y 174 0 95 T 02 E o D c X21 X 1 75N 11 50 N 94 i96 .u. ...11i .m- J� .il i...... JI 11 1- - ---- -- ....--- --- - - I I. 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 16.6 16.9 m/7 Min Amdis Enhanced Spec:Scan 2555(16.62),Qvalue=36 m/z 120.0 91 95 174 a 7: c • a X 6 X >- 5 >- 3• 75N 2: 1 .11. 50 ili_ _.,..w-JI it i...... 114 iI 196 11- 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 16.6 16.9 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 84 N-Propylbenzene (NIST) m/z 92.0 91 T O C O o X X > • 120N X92 ..i.. ..i. 65..I. 78 II. _...I. -..i. .-.--' 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 16.6 16.9 Min RT Mass Response Amount 16.62 91.00 1744 0.012441 16.84 120.00 0 16.61 92.00 14685 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:14:00 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 227 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:58 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\Chrom Data\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-09.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 19:37:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-4 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-4 Client ID: 6322 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 8 Worklist Smp#: 9 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: Al_TO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 87 4-Ethyltoluene, CAS: 622-96-8 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 2620(16.96) m/z 105.0 N 21 °�' 0 1o 1: 11 1 • 44 • 10512071 — 16.9 Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 FT I mh Enhanced Spec:Scan 2620(16.96),Qvalue=1 m/z 120.0 1, T 0 1 •E o X 11 5 >- • >- • -44 1051207"' 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 16.9 m17 Min 11 Ref Spec: 87 4-Ethyltoluene (NIST) 105 0 • 0 0 120"' 77NI 91N..1:103N.I11 "106 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 RT Mass Response Amount 16.96 105.00 140 0.001182 16.96 120.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:14:05 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 228 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:58 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-09.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 19:37:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-4 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-4 Client ID: 6322 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 8 Worklist Smp#: 9 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AlTO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 89 1 ,3,5-Trimethylbenzene, CAS: 108-67-8 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 2634(17.04) m/z 105.0 1 2 • 0 11 21 0 0 X j Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:58 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-09.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 19:37:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-4 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-4 Client ID: 6322 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 8 Worklist Smp#: 9 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15LLNJTO3 Limit Group: Al_TO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 92 1 ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene, CAS: 95-63-6 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 2751(17.66) 2, m/z 105.0 21 a 0 1: 11 X_ — • v44 207N 101 2531 17.4 Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 �2T m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 2751(17.66),Qvalue=l m/z 120.0 1, 0 1 •E O v151 X 10 >- >- • v44 207N 1051 2531 � I 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 17.4 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 92 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene (NIST) 105 X '120 • 77' .I--- IL ....LL- -...IIL. i 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 RT Mass Response Amount 17.66 105.00 149 0.001573 17.47 120.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:14:20 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 230 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:58 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-09.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 19:37:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-4 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-4 Client ID: 6322 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 8 Worklist Smp#: 9 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: 1015LLNJT03 Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 93 sec-Butylbenzene, CAS: 135-98-8 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 2751(17.66) /z 105.0 N 1• 2• 0 1 21 I 0 0 X 11 X 1: >- >- 1 X44 207N • 1051 253" 17.6 Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 FT i m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 2751(17.66),Qvalue=1 m/z 134.0 1, I T 0 1 o • X 11 MI . •X44 207N 105NI 2531 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 17.6 m/7 Min 11 Refs• ec: 93 sec-Butylbenzene (NIST) m/z 91.0 105 • •E o = 0 o_ X X • } • 91N 134N 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 17.6 Min RT Mass Response Amount 17.66 105.00 149 0.001030 17.66 134.00 0 17.66 91.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:14:23 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 231 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:58 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-09.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 19:37:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-4 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-4 Client ID: 6322 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 8 Worklist Smp#: 9 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: Al_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 95 1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene, CAS: 541-73-1 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 2794(17.89) m/z 146.0 1, 7 2, 40 1 21 0 0 11 0 1: X X >- 1 ' 744 207 146'N i 17.8 ` Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 4RT I m17 Enhanced Spec:Scan 2794(17.89),Qvalue=1 m/z 111.0 1, i 40 1 o .E 0 11 • X >- >- • 744 207' 146' i i 1 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 17.8 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 95 1,3-Dichlorobenzene (NIST) m/z 148.0 146 21_____1 • S 0 1 o '148 X 1 X ›- - `" 111N • 75N SOS... .I 1X51 73NiI I/113 i150 17.8 ..u. ..ill. . .1.. L. --16•. ..J I. - hi Min i 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 FT I RT Mass Response Amount 17.89 146.00 219 0.002951 17.89 111.00 0 17.89 148.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:14:31 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 232 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:58 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-09.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 19:37:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-4 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-4 Client ID: 6322 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 8 Worklist Smp#: 9 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AITO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 96 1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene, CAS: 106-46-7 Processing Results 1 Raw Spec:Scan 2815(18.00) m/z 146.0 1 31 0 0 11 0 2, X x 1: } >- 207N 1 . v44 146N G 17.9 Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 FT I m/7 1, Enhanced Spec:Scan 2815(18.00),Qvalue=1 m/z 111.0 1 > o E 0 11 cEC X 5:-.< >- } 207" . V44 146N 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 17.9 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 96 1,4-Dichlorobenzene (NIST) 31 m/z 1480 146 2 o 0 21 c. c) v148 X- X- 1 X } 11 111" 50" 75N — .111_.I, .,.. III, .,,(113 113 .i(15° 17.9 Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 FT I RT Mass Response Amount 18.00 146.00 302 0.004091 18.01 148.00 179 18.00 111.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:14:34 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 233 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:58 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-09.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 19:37:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-4 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-4 Client ID: 6322 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 8 Worklist Smp#: 9 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 100 1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene, CAS: 95-50-1 Processing Results 1 Raw Spec:Scan 2904(18.48) m/z 146.0 402 r. 1 0 0 11 — 21 X X 1 >- >- 207N 11 v44 1461 i 18.4 ` Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 FT I m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 2904(18.48),Qvalue=1 m/z 111.0 1, i 40 1 oV _0 11 cAP X X >- } 207N • v44 1461 i i 1 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 18.4 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 100 1,2-Dichlorobenzene (NIST) m/z 148.0 146 2' • 21 o '148 x 1: X 6 } 1 • • 111N 75• i 50N X113 '150 18.4 1,1-.1. ...73 .III- u..- ---- 11. .11- Min i 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 VT 1 RT Mass Response Amount 18.48 146.00 77 0.001073 18.48 111.00 0 18.48 148.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:14:59 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 234 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:58 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-09.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 19:37:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-4 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-4 Client ID: 6322 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 8 Worklist Smp#: 9 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_103 Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 103 1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene, CAS: 120-82-1 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 3346(20.84) m/z 180.0 1: 4: 1A 41 03 0 1 0 x 11 x —. 2, >- >- 207N 11 180" . 744 1 20.6 20.9 i Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Fr I m/7 1: Enhanced Spec:Scan 3346(20.84),Qvalue=1 m/z 182.0 1, 41 c, 1 0 3Eza x 11 x 2, >- >- • 207N 1: 180" . 744 i 20.6 20.9 i Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Fr I m/7 11 Ref Spec: 103 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene (NIST) 180 \182 0 0 0 X 145" '184 109" '147 74N 37N 84� I X73 X75 ..IIu . . -ii..- .II1._ 11,.. .1 iL .I I,17146 11.i. i 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 RT Mass Response Amount 20.84 180.00 937 0.017573 20.84 182.00 745 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:15:05 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 235 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:58 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-09.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 19:37:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-4 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-4 Client ID: 6322 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 8 Worklist Smp#: 9 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: T015LLNJTO3 Limit Group: AlT015ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 104 Hexachlorobutadiene, CAS: 87-68-3 Processing Results 1 Raw Spec:Scan 3376(21.00) m/z 225.0 3: °' 1• rn 31 0 N, 0 1 0 2 X 11 x >- > 1: • 207 " 1 07 6 x44 225 i I'I 20.8 21.1 i Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 FT i m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3376(21.00),Qvalue=12 m/z 223.0 1: 1• 21 a410 0 1 0 1: x 11 X 1 > >- 207 X44 225 i I 20.8 21.1 i Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 FT I m/7 11 Ref Spec: 104 Hexachlorobutadiene (NIST) 225 0 00 223" i X 190 • 118'' i 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 RT Mass Response Amount 21.00 225.00 401 0.006971 21.00 223.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:15:09 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 236 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:58 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-09.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 19:37:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-4 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-4 Client ID: 6322 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 8 Worklist Smp#: 9 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 105 Naphthalene, CAS: 91-20-3 Processing Results 1 Raw Spec:Scan 3438(21.33) m/z 128.00 61 cN 1, 51 1 0 41 x 11 x >- } 31 128" 21 207"- • 744 11 i 21.1 21.4 Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 �T mh Amdis Enhanced Spec:Scan 3438(21.33),Qvalue=93 91 128 6• • >- 5 3• 2: 1 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 m/7 11 Ref Spec: 105 Naphthalene (NIST) 128 • X 51� 64� 102N,I. 127' (129 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 RT Mass Response Amount 21.33 128.00 1596 0.016533 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:15:16 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 237 of 407 3/7/2019 FORM I AIR - GC/MS VOA ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: TestAmerica Burlington Job No. : 200-47377-1 SDG No. : Client Sample ID: 5891 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-5 ae Matrix: Air Lab File ID: 34571-10.D Analysis Method: TO-15 Date Collected: 02/12/2019 00:00 Sample wt/vol: 200 (mL) Date Analyzed: 02/13/2019 20:29 Soil Aliquot Vol: Dilution Factor: 1 Soil Extract Vol. : GC Column: RTX-624 ID: 0.32 (mm) % Moisture: Level: (low/med) Low Analysis Batch No. : 139960 Units: ppb v/v CAS NO. COMPOUND NAME RESULT Q RL RL 115-07-1 Propylene 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 75-71-8 Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-45-6 Freon 22 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 76-14-2 1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 74-87-3 Chloromethane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 106-97-8 n-Butane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-01-4 Vinyl chloride 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 i 106-99-0 1,3-Butadiene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 74-83-9 Bromomethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-00-3 Chloroethane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 593-60-2 Bromoethene(Vinyl Bromide) 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-69-4 Trichlorofluoromethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 64-17-5 Ethanol 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 76-13-1 Freon TF 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-35-4 1,1-Dichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 67-64-1 Acetone 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 67-63-0 Isopropyl alcohol 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 75-15-0 Carbon disulfide 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 107-05-1 3-Chloropropene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-09-2 Methylene Chloride 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-65-0 tert-Butyl alcohol 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 1634-04-4 Methyl tert-butyl ether 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 156-60-5 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 110-54-3 n-Hexane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-34-3 1,1-Dichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-05-4 Vinyl acetate 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 141-78-6 Ethyl acetate 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 78-93-3 Methyl Ethyl Ketone 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 156-59-2 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 540-59-0 1,2-Dichloroethene, Total 0.40 U 0.40 0.40 67-66-3 Chloroform 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 109-99-9 Tetrahydrofuran 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 71-55-6 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 110-82-7 Cyclohexane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 56-23-5 Carbon tetrachloride 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 540-84-1 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 FORM I TO-15 Page 238 of 407 3/7/2019 FORM I AIR - GC/MS VOA ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: TestAmerica Burlington Job No. : 200-47377-1 SDG No. : Client Sample ID: 5891 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-5 Matrix: Air Lab File ID: 34571-10.D Analysis Method: TO-15 Date Collected: 02/12/2019 00:00 Sample wt/vol: 200 (mL) Date Analyzed: 02/13/2019 20:29 Soil Aliquot Vol: Dilution Factor: 1 Soil Extract Vol. : GC Column: RTX-624 ID: 0.32 (mm) I Moisture: Level: (low/med) Low Analysis Batch No. : 139960 Units: ppb v/v CAS NO. COMPOUND NAME RESULT Q RL RL 71-43-2 Benzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 107-06-2 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 142-82-5 n-Heptane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 a 79-01-6 Trichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 A 80-62-6 Methyl methacrylate 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 78-87-5 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 123-91-1 1,4-Dioxane 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 • 75-27-4 Bromodichloromethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20111 10061-01-5 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-10-1 methyl isobutyl ketone 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 108-88-3 Toluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 10061-02-6 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 79-00-5 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 127-18-4 Tetrachloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 591-78-6 Methyl Butyl Ketone (2-Hexanone) 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 124-48-1 Dibromochloromethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 106-93-4 1,2-Dibromoethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-90-7 Chlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 100-41-4 Ethylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 179601-23-1 m,p-Xylene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 95-47-6 Xylene, o- 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 1330-20-7 Xylene (total) 0.70 U 0.70 0.70 100-42-5 Styrene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-25-2 Bromoform 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 98-82-8 Cumene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 79-34-5 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 103-65-1 n-Propylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 622-96-8 4-Ethyltoluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-67-8 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 95-49-8 2-Chlorotoluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 98-06-6 tert-Butylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 95-63-6 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 135-98-8 sec-Butylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 99-87-6 4-Isopropyltoluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 541-73-1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 106-46-7 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 FORM I TO-15 Page 239 of 407 3/7/2019 FORM I AIR - GC/MS VOA ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: TestAmerica Burlington Job No. : 200-47377-1 SDG No. : Client Sample ID: 5891 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-5 Matrix: Air Lab File ID: 34571-10.D Analysis Method: TO-15 Date Collected: 02/12/2019 00:00 Sample wt/vol: 200 (mL) Date Analyzed: 02/13/2019 20:29 Soil Aliquot Vol: Dilution Factor: 1 Soil Extract Vol. : GC Column: RTX-624 ID: 0.32 (mm) Moisture: Level: (low/med) Low Analysis Batch No. : 139960 Units: ppb v/v CAS NO. COMPOUND NAME RESULT Q RL RL 100-44-7 Benzyl chloride 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 104-51-8 n-Butylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 95-50-1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 120-82-1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 - % 87-68-3 Hexachlorobutadiene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 91-20-3 Naphthalene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 I FORM I TO-15 Page 240 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:39:00 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 TestAmerica Burlington Target Compound Quantitation Report Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\Chrom Data\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-10.D Lims ID: 200-47377-A-5 Client ID: 5891 Sample Type: Client Inject. Date: 13-Feb-2019 20:29:30 ALS Bottle#: 9 Worklist Smp#: 10 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Sample Info: 200-0034571-010 Misc. Info.: 47377-05 Operator ID: ggg Instrument ID: CHB.i Method: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\TO15_LLNJ_TO3.m Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Last Update: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:35 Calib Date: 13-Feb-2019 03:59:30 Integrator: RTE ID Type: Deconvolution ID Quant Method: Internal/External Standard Quant By: Initial Calibration Last ICal File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190212-34558.b\34558-14.D Column 1 : RTX-624 ( 0.32 mm) Det: MS SCAN Process Host: CTX0307 First Level Reviewer: bunmaa Date: 14-Feb-2019 11:18:51 RT Adj RT Dlt RT OnCol Amt Compound Sig (min.) (min.) (min.) Q Response ppb v/v Flags 1 Propene 41 3.135 ND 2 Dichlorodifluoromethane 85 3.193 ND • 3 Chlorodifluoromethane 51 3.231 NDla 41,2-Dichloro-1,1,2,2-tetra 85 3.412 ND 5 Chloromethane 50 3.535 ND 6 Butane 43 3.711 ND 7 Vinyl chloride 62 3.743 ND 8 Butadiene 54 3.807 ND 10 Bromomethane 94 4.463 ND 11 Chloroethane 64 4.693 ND 13 Vinyl bromide 106 5.099 ND 14 Trichlorofluoromethane 101 5.205 ND 16 Ethanol 45 5.659 ND 19 1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trif 101 6.225 ND 20 1,1-Dichloroethene 96 6.294 ND 21 Acetone 43 6.438 ND U 22 Isopropyl alcohol 45 6.668 ND 23 Carbon disulfide 76 6.721 ND 24 3-Chloro-1-propene 41 6.988 ND 27 Methylene Chloride 49 7.244 ND U 28 2-Methyl-2-propanol 59 7.367 ND 29 Methyl tert-butyl ether 73 7.602 ND 30 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 61 7.655 ND 32 Hexane 57 7.986 7.986 0.000 88 5182 0.1365 33 1,1-Dichloroethane 63 8.391 ND 34 Vinyl acetate 43 8.402 ND 36 2-Butanone (MEK) 72 9.277 ND 37 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 96 9.293 ND 35 Ethyl acetate 88 9.293 ND * 39 Chlorobromomethane 128 9.656 9.662 -0.006 83 210765 10.0 38 Tetrahydrofuran 42 9.678 ND Page 241 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:39:00 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-10.D RT Adj RT Dlt RT OnCol Amt Compound Sig (min.) (min.) (min.) Q Response ppb v/v Flags 40 Chloroform 83 9.736 ND 42 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 97 9.992 ND S 41 1,2-Dichloroethene, Total 61 10.000 ND 43 Cyclohexane 84 10.014 ND 44 Carbon tetrachloride 117 10.201 ND 45 Isooctane 57 10.489 ND 46 Benzene 78 10.526 ND MU 47 1,2-Dichloroethane 62 10.622 ND 48 n-Heptane 43 10.740 ND 50 1,4-Difluorobenzene 114 11.060 11.065 -0.005 94 922509 10.0 53 Trichloroethene 95 11.439 ND 54 1,2-Dichloropropane 63 11.802 ND 55 Methyl methacrylate 69 11.839 ND 56 1,4-Dioxane 88 11.930 ND 57 Dibromomethane 174 11.988 ND U 58 Dichlorobromomethane 83 12.159 ND 60 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 75 12.789 ND 61 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK 43 12.933 ND 64 Toluene 92 13.227 13.221 0.006 93 1073 0.0216 7M 66trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 75 13.579 ND 67 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 83 13.851 ND 68 Tetrachloroethene 166 13.995 ND 69 2-Hexanone 43 14.113 ND 70 Chlorodibromomethane 129 14.406 ND 410 71 Ethylene Dibromide 107 14.609 ND 72 Chlorobenzene-d5 117 15.169 15.175 -0.006 84 807809 10.0 73 Chlorobenzene 112 15.212 ND 74 Ethylbenzene 91 15.281 15.281 0.000 92 3498 0.0343 76 m-Xylene& p-Xylene 106 15.431 ND U 78 o-Xylene 106 15.943 15.943 0.000 90 942 0.0227 7M 79 Styrene 104 15.964 ND S 77 Xylenes, Total 106 0 0.0227 7 80 Bromoform 173 16.258 ND 81 lsopropylbenzene 105 16.354 ND 83 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 83 16.760 ND 84 N-Propylbenzene 91 16.840 ND U 87 4-Ethyltoluene 105 16.962 ND 88 2-Chlorotoluene 91 17.005 ND 89 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 105 17.032 ND 91 tert-Butylbenzene 119 17.400 ND 92 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 105 17.475 ND 93 sec-Butylbenzene 105 17.662 ND 94 4-Isopropyltoluene 119 17.811 ND 95 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 146 17.886 ND U 96 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 146 17.998 ND U 97 Benzyl chloride 91 18.147 ND U 99 n-Butylbenzene 91 18.318 ND U 100 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 146 18.484 ND U 103 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 180 20.826 ND 104 Hexachlorobutadiene 225 20.997 ND 105 Naphthalene 128 21.296 ND MU Page 242 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:39:00 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 QC Flag Legend Processing Flags 7- Failed Limit of Detection Review Flags M - Manually Integrated U - Marked Undetected Reagents: ATTO15BISs_00007 Amount Added: 20.00 Units: mL Run Reagent Page 243 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:39:00 Chrom Revision:2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-10.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 20:29:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Operator ID: ggg Lims ID: 200-47377-A-5 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-5 Worklist Smp#: 10 Client ID: 5891 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil.Factor: 1.0000 ALS Bottle#: 9 Method: TO15LLNJTO3 Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column:RTX-624(0.32 mm) Y Scaling:Method Defined:Scale to the Nth Largest Target: 1 34571-10[MS SCAN Chro]Total 19- 15 0 14 O 13- O 2 0 y U 12- N D 11 2 0 0 ca 1Q' n O 10 O a O � 8 s X > $ m E 0 0 7' ` 0 `o g U � I 7 3 1- I 1111IIVl •II a A UU 11 1111111111 1111111/1 N 1II1 141 IILI II I III U W NI 1l •1II 111 MI 1111 II L1 NI ANN AII.1•II II 1 11 1 U IIA II II 111111/111 II.11111 IIW1111 II I 1 I. IL O 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0Min 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 • Page 244 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:39:00 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\Chrom Data\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-10.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 20:29:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-5 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-5 Client ID: 5891 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 9 Worklist Smp#: 10 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15LLNJTO3 Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 21 Acetone, CAS: 67-64-1 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 661(6.51) 4 m/z 43.0 1 40 3 0 11 0 2: X ;-<- 1 21 >- >- i 1, 44N 58' i 6.2 6.5 i Min 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 ItTT 1 m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 661(6.51),Qvalue=7 m/z 58.0 1 40 21 I II 0 11 1: 0 0 X x 1 >- } 44\ 581 6.2 6.5 i Min 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 VZT 1 m/7 11 Ref Spec: 2 1 Acetone (NIST) 43 0 0 0 X 5S". I . 42\, i 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 RT Mass Response Amount 6.51 43.00 922 0.040871 6.44 58.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:16:03 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 245 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:39:00 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-10.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 20:29:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-5 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-5 Client ID: 5891 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 9 Worklist Smp#: 10 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 27 Methylene Chloride, CAS: 75-09-2 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 799(7.24) m/z 49.0 5, .1- 1 1 N 4 r; o_ 11 0 3 X X 2 >- >- : 1: 44'' 49N __49 84N1 i 7.1 7.4 i Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 FT I m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 799(7.24),Qvalue=1 m/z 84.0 31 7r 1 N 2 0 11 0 0 21 X X1111 1 >- >- : 11 44N 49' 49 84\1 I7.1 7.4 i Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 FT i m/7 11 Ref Spec: 27 Methylene Chloride (NIST) m/z 86.0 49 21 o 0 1: 0 84N X 1 X 6 >- X86 ' • X51 • 47N i 7.4 7.1 i i I i I Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 VtT i RT Mass Response Amount 7.24 49.00 533 0.026060 7.24 84.00 174 7.24 86.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:16:12 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 246 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:39:00 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-10.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 20:29:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-5 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-5 Client ID: 5891 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 9 Worklist Smp#: 10 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 46 Benzene, CAS: 71-43-2 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 1414(10.53) m/z 78.0 CD 1 11 CVLi 0 11 78 0 o_ o_ X X i } } • 51N 441 i 10.3 10.6 ` Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 KT I m17 Amdis Enhanced Spec:Scan 1414(10.53),Qvalue=79 m/z 77.0 91 78 21 0EIZI,a 7' a 1: x 6 X 1 >- 5 } 3• 2: i 1 10.3 10.6 i Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 AZT I m/7 11 Ref Spec: 46 Benzene (NIST) 78 a 0 0 77N 51 /52 381 I 76"i 79\1 , I i . 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 RT Mass Response Amount 10.53 78.00 1801 0.026913 10.53 77.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:16:52 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 247 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:39:00 Chrom Revision:2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 '•; Manual Integration/User Assign Peak Report . .._ TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-10.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 20:29:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-5 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-5 Client ID: 5891 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 9 Worklist Smp#: 10 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: Al_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 64 Toluene, CAS: 108-88-3 Signal: 1 Processing Integration Results RT: 13.23 m/z 92.0 Area: 626 61 N Amount: 0.012577 5; Amount Units: ppb v/v 5 4: 4, 41 0 3; > 3 2: 2, 21 1: •1 i 12.9 13.1 13.3 13.5 Min Manual Integration Results RT: 13.23 m/z 92.0 h Area: 1073 60- Amount: 0.021558 55- Amount Units: ppb v/v 50- 45- 40- a 35- 3 • } 30 25- 20- 15- • 10- • :- 0 12.9 13.1 13.3 13.5 Min RT I I Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:17:15 Audit Action: Manually Integrated Audit Reason:Assign Peak Page 248 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:39:00 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-10.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 20:29:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-5 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-5 Client ID: 5891 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 9 Worklist Smp#: 10 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15LLNJTO3 Limit Group: Al_TO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 76 m-Xylene & p-Xylene, CAS: 179601-23-1 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 2306(15.29) m/z 106.0 1, 91� 61 0 N 0 1 51 r '>R" 11 X 41 >- } 31 106N 21 • 117N 11 1/44 1 I ` 15.2 15.5 Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 104 108 112 116 120 FT m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 2306(15.29),Qvalue=01 m/z 91.0 1, 91 N 1 1 r 0 0 X• Y'; 1121 } i 106N 117N . 1r44 77' I ` 15.2 15.5 Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 104 108 112 116 120 FT I m17 RT Mass Response Amount 15.29 106.00 1065 0.026051 15.28 91.00 3498 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:17:33 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 249 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:39:00 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 Manual Integration/User Assign Peak Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-10.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 20:29:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-5 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-5 Client ID: 5891 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 9 Worklist Smp#: 10 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: Al_TO15ICAL Column: RTX-624(0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 78 o-Xylene, CAS: 95-47-6 Signal: 1 Processing Integration Results RT: 15.94 m/z 106.0 Area: 825 70- m Amount: 0.019845 65- Amount Units: ppb v/v 60- 55- 50- Es- 0- 55- 50-0 45- 40- • } 35- :j 30' 25' 110 20- 15' 10- 0 - 15.6 15.8 16.0 16.2 Min Manual Integration Results RT: 15.94 m/z 106.0 Area: 942 70- m Amount: 0.022659 65- r Amount Units: ppb v/v 60- 55- 50- 45- E 40- X -- 35- >- 30- 25- 5-30- 25' 20- 15' : .: 10- ••0 I 15.6 15.8 16.0 16.2 Min RT I I Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:17:45 Audit Action: Manually Integrated Audit Reason:Assign Peak Page 250 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:39:00 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-10.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 20:29:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-5 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-5 Client ID: 5891 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 9 Worklist Smp#: 10 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 84 N-Propylbenzene, CAS: 103-65-1 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 2554(16.61) m/z 91.0 2: 95 174 N 2 0 176 21 0 2, 0 2 11 X 21 X > 1: >- 1 75N 1 \ 94N. X96 u.50.SII. ._.w�.11..1�1..... 11 it I- II-X177 16.6 16.9Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 iiT 1 m/7 Amdis Enhanced Spec:Scan 2554(16.61),Qvalue=36 m/z 120.0 91 95 174 176 7: a 0 x 6 >7 EM x >- 5 >- 3' 75N 2: 1 .11.50,II_ 71L I .-..._ 911 di 1 96 11'177 • 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 16.6 16.9 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 84 N-Propylbenzene (NIST) m/z 92.0 91 a • •E o 0 CD X X >- 120N 65 v92 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 16.6 16.9 Min RT Mass Response Amount 16.61 91.00 1638 0.012635 16.84 120.00 0 16.61 92.00 14083 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:17:57 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 251 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:39:00 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-10.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 20:29:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-5 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-5 Client ID: 5891 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 9 Worklist Smp#: 10 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AlTO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 95 1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene, CAS: 541-73-1 Processing Results 1 Raw Spec:Scan 2795(17.90) 2 m/z 146.0 1 21 0 11 0 11 x x 1 >- >- ii • '44 146 207 ` 17.8 ` Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 FT m/7 1 Enhanced Spec:Scan 2795(17.90),Qvalue=1 m/z 111.0 1 Y o •E Nimii 11 c ;-<- - >- >- • X44 1461207N 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 17.8 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 95 1,3-Dichlorobenzene (NIST) m/z 148.0 146 T • C c o_ "148 x X — 111N 75N 50 (113 73\� 150 II i1,� I ... ..iii. I II. 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 17.8 M[n RT Mass Response Amount 17.90 146.00 141 0.002054 17.89 111.00 0 17.89 148.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:18:10 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 252 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:39:00 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-10.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 20:29:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-5 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-5 Client ID: 5891 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 9 Worklist Smp#: 10 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 96 1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene, CAS: 106-46-7 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 2814(18.00) m/z 146.0 0) 84 2 a'• r o_ 7 _0 21 X 61 x 1 >- 4: >- 11 3: __44 207" 2, 146N i 1 17.9 i _ Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 FT I m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 2814(18.00),Qvalue=1 m/z 111.0 8' >, 7 •E o_ c X61 R 4: > 3; X44 207" 2, 146" 1 i , i 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 17.9 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 96 1,4-Dichlorobenzene (NIST) m/z 148.0 146 2 i • 21 0 0 c '148 x 1 i X } 11 • 111 50� 75N i — �Ir-I. III, I 113 .11I'150 17.9 i Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 KT i RT Mass Response Amount 18.00 146.00 81 0.001186 18.00 111.00 0 18.00 148.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:18:12 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 253 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:39:00 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-10.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 20:29:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-5 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-5 Client ID: 5891 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 9 Worklist Smp#: 10 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: Al_TO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 97 Benzyl chloride, CAS: 100-44-7 Processing Results 1 Raw Spec:Scan 2874(18.32) m/z 91.0 1 a 0 11 X >- >- 207N 207" • 1/44 911 i i t 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 18.0 m/7 Min Enhanced Spec:Scan 2874(18.32),Qvalue=1 m/z 126.0 1, 1jek o c E' 0 11 207N 1/44 911 � t t 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 18.0 m/7 Min 1 Ref Spec: 97 Benzyl chloride (NIST) m/z 65.0 91 • C O o X • X � } 126N 65" 39� 1'92 (128 . . . 1 89a ,I, _ L . t t 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 18.0 Min RT Mass Response Amount 18.32 91.00 131 0.001837 18.15 126.00 0 18.15 65.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:18:15 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 254 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:39:00 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-10.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 20:29:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-5 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-5 Client ID: 5891 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 9 Worklist Smp#: 10 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15LLNJTO3 Limit Group: AITO15ICAL `` Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 99 n-Butylbenzene, CAS: 104-51-8 Processing Results 1 Raw Spec:Scan 2874(18.32) m/z 91.0 21 M 0 1 1: o_ 11 0 X X 1 207 , 1'44 911 ` — 18.2 Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 VT 1 t mb 1 Enhanced Spec:Scan 2874(18.32),Qvalue=1 m/z 134.0 1 T o •E 0 0 11 cEl X X } } 207' 1'44 911 i , 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 18.2 m17 Min 11 Ref Spec: 99 n-Butylbenzene (NIST) m/z 92.0 91 _ c C 0 oi X92 X X >- 134' .1771.. 65..I I. 39)11 1105 1. 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 18.2 Min RT Mass Response Amount 18.32 91.00 131 0.001273 18.32 134.00 0 18.32 92.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:18:22 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 255 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:39:00 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB."\20190213-34571.b\34571-10.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 20:29:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-5 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-5 Client ID: 5891 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 9 Worklist Smp#: 10 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AITO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 ( 0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 100 1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene, CAS: 95-50-1 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 2906(18.49) m/z 146.0 1 2 0 11 21 _o 0 X X 1 } } 1, • "44 207" 146"' 1"148 18.4 Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 FT m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 2906(18.49),Qvalue=1 m/z 111.0 1 0 11 •- "` c >- >- • "44 207N 14611"148 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 18.4 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 100 1,2-Dichlorobenzene (NIST) 2 m/z 148.0 146 21 o on o "148 >‘R 1 X >- • 111` 75N 50" N �. "113 I"150 18.4 �i-.1. -.--73 .ii�. . .. ��. - -I i. Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 FT RT Mass Response Amount 18.49 146.00 90 0.001356 18.48 111.00 0 18.48 148.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:18:24 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 256 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:39:00 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-10.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 20:29:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-5 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-5 Client ID: 5891 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 9 Worklist Smp#: 10 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15LLNJTO3 Limit Group: AlTO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 105 Naphthalene, CAS: 91-20-3 Processing Results 1 Raw Spec:Scan 3433(21.30) m/z 128.0 4 11 3 X X 2. -- 21 } } 207 1, X44 128N 21.2 Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 FT m/7 1 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3433(21.30),Qvalue=1 11 • J-X 207'` X44 128 ' 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 m/7 15 Ref Spec: 105 Naphthalene (NIST) 128 X 51 I 64 IL i,i, 102' 127 Il 129 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 RT Mass Response Amount 21.30 128.00 65 0.000728 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:18:47 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 257 of 407 3/7/2019 FORM I AIR - GC/MS VOA ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: TestAmerica Burlington Job No. : 200-47377-1 SDG No. : Client Sample ID: 4862 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-6 re Matrix: Air Lab File ID: 34571-11.D Analysis Method: TO-15 Date Collected: 02/12/2019 00:00 Sample wt/vol: 200 (mL) Date Analyzed: 02/13/2019 21:21 Soil Aliquot Vol: Dilution Factor: 1 Soil Extract Vol. : GC Column: RTX-624 ID: 0.32 (mm) Moisture: Level: (low/med) Low Analysis Batch No. : 139960 Units: ppb v/v CAS NO. COMPOUND NAME RESULT Q RL RL 115-07-1 Propylene 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 75-71-8 Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-45-6 Freon 22 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 „ 76-14-2 1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 „° 74-87-3 Chloromethane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 106-97-8 n-Butane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-01-4 Vinyl chloride 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 106-99-0 1,3-Butadiene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 74-83-9 Bromomethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-00-3 Chloroethane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 593-60-2 Bromoethene(Vinyl Bromide) 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-69-4 Trichlorofluoromethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 64-17-5 Ethanol 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 76-13-1 Freon TF 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-35-4 1,1-Dichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 67-64-1 Acetone 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 67-63-0 Isopropyl alcohol 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 75-15-0 Carbon disulfide 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 107-05-1 3-Chloropropene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-09-2 Methylene Chloride 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-65-0 tert-Butyl alcohol 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 1634-04-4 Methyl tert-butyl ether 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 156-60-5 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 110-54-3 n-Hexane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-34-3 1,1-Dichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-05-4 Vinyl acetate 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 141-78-6 Ethyl acetate 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 78-93-3 Methyl Ethyl Ketone 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 156-59-2 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 540-59-0 1,2-Dichloroethene, Total 0.40 U 0.40 0.40 67-66-3 Chloroform 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 109-99-9 Tetrahydrofuran 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 71-55-6 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 110-82-7 Cyclohexane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 56-23-5 Carbon tetrachloride 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 540-84-1 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 FORM I TO-15 Page 258 of 407 3/7/2019 FORM I AIR - GC/MS VOA ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: TestAmerica Burlington Job No. : 200-47377-1 SDG No. : Client Sample ID: 4862 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-6 1440 Matrix: Air Lab File ID: 34571-11.D Analysis Method: TO-15 Date Collected: 02/12/2019 00:00 Sample wt/vol: 200 (mL) Date Analyzed: 02/13/2019 21:21 Soil Aliquot Vol: Dilution Factor: 1 Soil Extract Vol. : GC Column: RTX-624 ID: 0.32 (mm) % Moisture: Level: (low/med) Low Analysis Batch No. : 139960 Units: ppb v/v CAS NO. COMPOUND NAME RESULT Q RL RL 71-43-2 Benzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 107-06-2 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 142-82-5 n-Heptane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 79-01-6 Trichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 rt 80-62-6 Methyl methacrylate 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 78-87-5 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 123-91-1 1,4-Dioxane 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 • 75-27-4 Bromodichloromethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20al 10061-01-5 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-10-1 methyl isobutyl ketone 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 108-88-3 Toluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 10061-02-6 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 79-00-5 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 127-18-4 Tetrachloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 591-78-6 Methyl Butyl Ketone (2-Hexanone) 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 124-48-1 Dibromochloromethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 106-93-4 1,2-Dibromoethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-90-7 Chlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 100-41-4 Ethylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 179601-23-1 m,p-Xylene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 95-47-6 Xylene, o- 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 1330-20-7 Xylene (total) 0.70 U 0.70 0.70 100-42-5 Styrene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-25-2 Bromoform 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 98-82-8 Cumene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 79-34-5 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 103-65-1 n-Propylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 622-96-8 4-Ethyltoluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-67-8 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 95-49-8 2-Chlorotoluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 98-06-6 tert-Butylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 95-63-6 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 135-98-8 sec-Butylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 99-87-6 4-Isopropyltoluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 541-73-1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 106-46-7 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 FORM I TO-15 Page 259 of 407 3/7/2019 f FORM I AIR - GC/MS VOA ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: TestAmerica Burlington Job No. : 200-47377-1 SDG No. : Client Sample ID: 4862 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-6 ,.` ' Matrix: Air Lab File ID: 34571-11.D Analysis Method: TO-15 Date Collected: 02/12/2019 00:00 Sample wt/vol: 200 (mL) Date Analyzed: 02/13/2019 21:21 Soil Aliquot Vol: Dilution Factor: 1 Soil Extract Vol. : GC Column: RTX-624 ID: 0.32 (mm) - Moisture: Level: (low/med) Low Analysis Batch No. : 139960 Units: ppb v/v CAS NO. COMPOUND NAME RESULT Q RL RL 100-44-7 Benzyl chloride 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 104-51-8 n-Butylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 95-50-1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20w:k 120-82-1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 " F 87-68-3 Hexachlorobutadiene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 91-20-3 Naphthalene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 I FORM I TO-15 Page 260 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:39:02 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 TestAmerica Burlington Target Compound Quantitation Report Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-11.D Lims ID: 200-47377-A-6 Client ID: 4862 Sample Type: Client Inject. Date: 13-Feb-2019 21:21:30 ALS Bottle#: 10 Worklist Smp#: 11 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Sample Info: 200-0034571-011 Misc. Info.: 47377-06 Operator ID: ggg Instrument ID: CHB.i Method: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\TO15LLNJ_TO3.m Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Last Update: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:35 Calib Date: 13-Feb-2019 03:59:30 Integrator: RTE ID Type: Deconvolution ID Quant Method: Internal/External Standard Quant By: Initial Calibration Last ICal File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190212-34558.b\34558-14.D Column 1 : RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Det: MS SCAN Process Host: CTX0307 First Level Reviewer: bunmaa Date: 14-Feb-2019 11:23:10 RT Adj RT Dlt RT OnCol Amt Compound Sig (min.) (min.) (min.) Q Response ppb v/v Flags 1 Propene 41 3.135 ND 2 Dichlorodifluoromethane 85 3.193 ND 0 3 Chlorodifluoromethane 51 3.231 NDIla 4 1,2-Dichloro-1,1,2,2-tetra 85 3.412 ND 5 Chloromethane 50 3.535 ND 6 Butane 43 3.711 ND 7 Vinyl chloride 62 3.743 ND 8 Butadiene 54 3.807 ND 10 Bromomethane 94 4.463 ND 11 Chloroethane 64 4.693 ND 13 Vinyl bromide 106 5.099 ND 14 Trichlorofluoromethane 101 5.205 ND 16 Ethanol 45 5.659 ND 19 1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trif 101 6.225 ND 20 1,1-Dichloroethene 96 6.294 ND 21 Acetone 43 6.438 ND U 22 Isopropyl alcohol 45 6.668 ND 23 Carbon disulfide 76 6.721 ND U 24 3-Chloro-1-propene 41 6.988 ND 27 Methylene Chloride 49 7.244 ND 28 2-Methyl-2-propanol 59 7.367 ND 29 Methyl tert-butyl ether 73 7.602 ND 30 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 61 7.655 ND 32 Hexane 57 7.986 7.986 0.000 89 4931 0.1378 33 1,1-Dichloroethane 63 8.391 ND 34 Vinyl acetate 43 8.402 ND 36 2-Butanone (MEK) 72 9.277 ND 37 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 96 9.293 ND 35 Ethyl acetate 88 9.293 ND * 39 Chlorobromomethane 128 9.651 9.662 -0.011 85 198782 10.0 38 Tetrahydrofuran 42 9.678 ND Page 261 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:39:02 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-11.D RT Adj RT Dlt RT OnCol Amt Compound Sig (min.) (min.) (min.) Q Response ppb v/v Flags 40 Chloroform 83 9.736 ND 42 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 97 9.992 ND S 41 1,2-Dichloroethene, Total 61 10.000 ND 43 Cyclohexane 84 10.014 ND 44 Carbon tetrachloride 117 10.201 ND 45 Isooctane 57 10.489 ND 46 Benzene 78 10.531 10.526 0.005 88 2008 0.0317 47 1,2-Dichloroethane 62 10.622 ND 48 n-Heptane 43 10.740 ND 50 1,4-Difluorobenzene 114 11.060 11.065 -0.005 94 872545 10.0 53 Trichloroethene 95 11.439 ND 54 1,2-Dichloropropane 63 11.802 ND 55 Methyl methacrylate 69 11.839 ND 56 1,4-Dioxane 88 11.930 ND 57 Dibromomethane 174 11.988 ND MU 58 Dichlorobromomethane 83 12.159 ND 60 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 75 12.789 ND 61 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK 43 12.933 ND 64 Toluene 92 13.237 13.221 0.016 95 1065 0.0226 7M 66 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 75 13.579 ND 67 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 83 13.851 ND 68 Tetrachloroethene 166 13.995 ND 69 2-Hexanone 43 14.113 ND 70 Chlorodibromomethane 129 14.406 ND EP 71 Ethylene Dibromide 107 14.609 ND 72 Chlorobenzene-d5 117 15.169 15.175 -0.006 84 764129 10.0 73 Chlorobenzene 112 15.212 ND 74 Ethylbenzene 91 15.292 15.281 0.011 92 3457 0.0359 M 76 m-Xylene& p-Xylene 106 15.431 ND U 78 o-Xylene 106 15.943 ND 79 Styrene 104 15.964 ND S 77 Xylenes, Total 106 16.000 ND 80 Bromoform 173 16.258 ND 81 lsopropylbenzene 105 16.354 ND 83 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 83 16.760 ND 84 N-Propylbenzene 91 16.840 ND U 87 4-Ethyltoluene 105 16.962 ND 88 2-Chlorotoluene 91 17.005 ND 89 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 105 17.032 ND 91 tert-Butylbenzene 119 17.400 ND 92 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 105 17.475 ND 93 sec-Butylbenzene 105 17.662 ND 94 4-Isopropyltoluene 119 17.811 ND 95 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 146 17.886 ND U 96 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 146 17.998 ND U 97 Benzyl chloride 91 18.147 ND 99 n-Butylbenzene 91 18.318 ND 100 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 146 18.484 ND 103 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 180 20.826 ND MU 104 Hexachlorobutadiene 225 20.997 ND 105 Naphthalene 128 21.296 ND MU Page 262 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:39:02 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 QC Flag Legend Processing Flags 7- Failed Limit of Detection Review Flags M - Manually Integrated U -Marked Undetected Reagents: ATTOI5BISs_00007 Amount Added: 20.00 Units: mL Run Reagent Page 263 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date:14-Feb-2019 10:39:02 Chrom Revision:2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-11.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 21:21:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Operator ID: ggg Lims ID: 200-47377-A-6 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-6 Worklist Smp#: 11 Client ID: 4862 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil.Factor: 1.0000 ALS Bottle#: 10 Method: TO15_LLNJTO3 Limit Group: AITO15_ICAL al Column:RTX-624(0.32 mm) Y Scaling:Method Defined:Scale to the Nth Largest Target: 1 15- 34571-11[MS SCAN Chro]:Total m m 14- a 13' O N O d S 12- _ o 1") • 1 1' N 0 10- 0 •s a 0 o x 3 i m 0 2 2 B o • 3 Iltttl1V1 1 HWII 1 1 m u m Nut II a IN Alllll �Il l d UM III I 111111 Dew W u II All IIu NN WI m tl n tu�ltt I 1 I t III tuna 13 Wl1 Holt+ 111 u u ■ a 111HE t 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 Min Page 264 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:39:02 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-11.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 21:21:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-6 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-6 Client ID: 4862 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 10 Worklist Smp#: 11 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: Al_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 21 Acetone, CAS: 67-64-1 Processing Results 1 Raw Spec:Scan 661(6.51) m/z 43.0 Lii 11 4 _o 0 3: X '>--< >- 6 43� } 2 1: 44N i 6.2 6.5 i Min 40 42 44 46 48 50 FT I m/7 1 Enhanced Spec:Scan 661(6.51),Qvalue=1 m/z 58.0 31 11 2 0 • o 0 21 ;7‹ X 1 } 43N } 11 44N G 6.2 6.5 ` Min 40 42 44 46 48 50 FT I m/7 11 Ref Spec: 21 Acetone (NIST) 43 0 0 0 X • i 40 42 44 46 48 50 RT Mass Response Amount 6.51 43.00 1271 0.059738 6.44 58.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:20:30 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 265 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:39:02 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-11.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 21:21:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-6 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-6 Client ID: 4862 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 10 Worklist Smp#: 11 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AITO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 23 Carbon disulfide, CAS: 75-15-0 Processing Results 1 Raw Spec:Scan 700(6.72) m/z 76.0 LO2 11 21 CD _o X 1 s } 11 , 44N 761 i 6.6 Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 PT m/7 1 Enhanced Spec:Scan 700(6.72),Qvalue=2 1': • 44N 76N 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 m17 11 Ref Spec: 23 Carbon disulfide (NIST) 76 44NI I i 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 RT Mass Response Amount 6.72 76.00 84 0.001537 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:20:37 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 266 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:39:02 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 Manual Integration/User Assign Peak Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-11.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 21:21:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-6 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-6 Client ID: 4862 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 10 Worklist Smp#: 11 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 ='' Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 64 Toluene, CAS: 108-88-3 Signal: 1 Processing Integration Results RT: 13.24 65_ m/z^92.0 Area: 558 N Amount: 0.011852 60- Amount Units: ppb v/v 55- 50- 45- 40- 35- 5- 50- 45- 40- 35 tAdj 30 • • - • 25- 2G- • 15- 1 0 12.9 13.1 13.3 13.5 Min Manual Integration Results RT: 13.2465•, m/z 92.0 Area: 1065 Amount: 0.022620 60- ri Amount Units: ppb v/v 55- 50- 45- 40- •• R 35- 30- �..• l." 25- 20- 15- 10- 5- 5-20-15-10-5 \•. 12.9 13.1 13.3 13.5 Min RT � Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:21:44 Audit Action: Manually Integrated Audit Reason: Assign Peak Page 267 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:39:02 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 Manual Integration/User Assign Peak Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-11.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 21:21:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-6 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-6 Client ID: 4862 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 10 Worklist Smp#: 11 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 74 Ethylbenzene, CAS: 100-41-4 Signal: 1 Processing Integration Results RT: 15.291 m/z 91.0 N Area: 1702 N Amount: 0.017661 le- Amount eAmount Units: ppb v/v 14- 12- 0 Xj 10' > :I S ••4 410 • 14.9 15.1 15.3 15.5 Min Manual Integration Results RT: 15.29m/z 91.0 1 ra Area: 3457 N Amount: 0.035872 18- Amount Units: ppb v/v 14- 12- 0 10- X } $ • 4- 14.9 15.1 15.3 15.5 Min RT i Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:22:03 Audit Action: Manually Integrated Audit Reason: Assign Peak Page 268 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:39:02 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-11.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 21:21:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-6 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-6 Client ID: 4862 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 10 Worklist Smp#: 11 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: T015LLNJT03 Limit Group: Al 1015 ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 76 m-Xylene & p-Xylene, CAS: 179601-23-1 Processing Results 1 Raw Spec:Scan 2308(15.30) m/z 106.0 11 91\ � C � C x . x 106" 44 117" 82" 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100104108112116120 15.3 m/7 Min 1 Enhanced Spec:Scan 2308(15.30),Qvalue=0 m/z 91.0 11 91" o • X >- G >- 106N 106" 44821 117" 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 104 108 112 116 120 15.3 m/7 Min RT Mass Response Amount 15.30 106.00 279 0.007215 15.29 91.00 1702 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:22:12 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 269 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:39:03 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-11.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 21:21:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-6 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-6 Client ID: 4862 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 10 Worklist Smp#: 11 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 84 N-Propylbenzene, CAS: 103-65-1 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 2555(16.62) m/z 91.0 2: 95 174\ 176 2' 0 2' 21 0 0 21 0 1: x x } 1: -- 1 1 75N \ \ 4 X96 X177 16.6 16.9 ��.50.Ili w 11.al i.....- _9,4•N II\il 1- I I Min i 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 FT I m/7 Amdis Enhanced Spec:Scan 2555(16.62),Qvalue=36 m/z 120.0 7 7 91 95 174 \176 7: •E i a c X_ 6 >- 5 >- 75N 3• 2: 50N 74N 1 n. -..-ill- m- _��..�I�--.-._9I i�11 96 11177 1111 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 16.6 16.9 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 84 N-Propylbenzene (NIST) m/z 92.0 91 T • •C S 7<c, X • } 120' i 65\L78`l 17992 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 16.6 16.9 Min RT Mass Response Amount 16.62 91.00 1502 0.012248 16.84 120.00 0 16.61 92.00 14230 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:22:21 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 270 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:39:03 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-11.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 21:21:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-6 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-6 Client ID: 4862 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 10 Worklist Smp#: 11 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: T015LLNJTO3 Limit Group: Al_1015_ICAL Column: RTX-624 ( 0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 95 1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene, CAS: 541-73-1 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 2795(17.90) m/z 14•.0 1, 31 0 1 2 , o_ 1i 7< _0 21 X >- } 1 11 207N 144 146 — 17.8 f Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 PT I m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 2795(17.90),Qvalue=1 m/z 111.0 1, 0 1 E • _oIla 11 X• >- • } 207N I�44 146" 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 17.8 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 95 1,3-Dichlorobenzene (NIST) m/z 148.0 146 T O o 148 X X i _ 111N 75N 50N 51 73NiI I/113 I�150 ` II. 1. -i - II.- -- -..dl. -. II. i i 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 17.8 Min RT Mass Response Amount 17.90 146.00 175 0.002696 17.89 111.00 0 17.89 148.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:22:30 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 271 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:39:03 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 r'° User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-11.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 21:21:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-6 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-6 Client ID: 4862 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 10 Worklist Smp#: 11 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 96 1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene, CAS: 106-46-7 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 2817(18.01) m/z 146.0 31 .4- 1 i 11 2 o 0 21 X X — 1 - ' -_44 207N } 11 146N i 17.9 I Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 KT I m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 2817(18.01),Qvalue=1 m/z 111.0 10 o E o . `'_ c X0 } • 744 207N } • 146N 0 1 1 I 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 17.9 m/7 Min 1 Ref Spec: 96 1,4-Dichlorobenzene (NIST) m/z 148.0 146 21 o 0 1: o p148 x 1 x r 111N 50N 75N 0 ..,l1 _I. ..III, .. (1.13 .11150 17.9 i .... - - Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 KT 1 RT Mass Response Amount 18.01 146.00 247 0.003824 18.00 111.00 0 18.00 148.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:22:33 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 272 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:39:03 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-11.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 21:21:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-6 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-6 Client ID: 4862 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 10 Worklist Smp#: 11 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_103 Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 ( 0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 103 1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene, CAS: 120-82-1 Processing Results 1 Raw Spec:Scan 3344(20.83) 4 m/z 180.00 N co 1 3 0 0 11 0 2: X XII 21 207N 1, 44 180` i 20.7 fi Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 fj:I- I m/7 1 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3344(20.83),Qvalue=1 m/z 182.0 3: _ 1 31 II o • 11 21E1 X X 1: 207N 1 • r44 180N i 20.7 i Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 IF I m/7 1 Ref Spec: 103 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene (NIST) 180 182 o 0 o_ X 145" • '184 109" 147 74N 37N 84� I X73 X75 ,.II._ii. _.,.. .I1�. L.._ .. .,I... .11/146 ii.r i 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 RT Mass Response Amount 20.83 180.00 378 0.008104 20.84 182.00 432 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:22:48 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 273 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:39:03 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-11.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 21:21:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-6 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-6 Client ID: 4862 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 10 Worklist Smp#: 11 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AlT015ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 105 Naphthalene, CAS: 91-20-3 Processing Results 1 Raw Spec:Scan 3439(21.33) m/z 128.0 co 4: co co 11 4, T a 207 o x x 3 - 2• X44 128 } 1: 21.1 21.4 ` Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 r 1 m/7 Amdis Enhanced Spec:Scan 3439(21.33),Qvalue=61 i 91 207 7: 751 X6 >- 5 ', 3* 128' 2: 11 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 m/7 11 Ref Spec: 105 Naphthalene (NIST) 128 0 0 0 X 4 • 12711129 51'`.1.-64 II no. 1021'). JI L G 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 RT Mass Response Amount 21.33 128.00 1027 0.012161 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:23:05 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 274 of 407 3/7/2019 00404-4 01 FORM I AIR - GC/MS VOA ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: TestAmerica Burlington Job No. : 200-47377-1 SDG No. : Client Sample ID: 6486 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-7 Matrix: Air Lab File ID: 34571-12.D Analysis Method: TO-15 Date Collected: 02/12/2019 00:00 Sample wt/vol: 200 (mL) Date Analyzed: 02/13/2019 22:13 Soil Aliquot Vol: Dilution Factor: 1 „r Soil Extract Vol. : GC Column: RTX-624 ID: 0.32 (mm) % Moisture: Level: (low/med) Low Analysis Batch No. : 139960 Units: ppb v/v CAS NO. COMPOUND NAME RESULT Q RL RL 115-07-1 Propylene 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 75-71-8 Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-45-6 Freon 22 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 76-14-2 1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 74-87-3 Chloromethane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 106-97-8 n-Butane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-01-4 Vinyl chloride 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 . 106-99-0 1,3-Butadiene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 74-83-9 Bromomethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-00-3 Chloroethane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 593-60-2 Bromoethene(Vinyl Bromide) 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-69-4 Trichlorofluoromethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 64-17-5 Ethanol 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 76-13-1 Freon TF 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-35-4 1,1-Dichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 67-64-1 Acetone 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 67-63-0 Isopropyl alcohol 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 75-15-0 Carbon disulfide 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 107-05-1 3-Chloropropene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-09-2 Methylene Chloride 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-65-0 tert-Butyl alcohol 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 1634-04-4 Methyl tert-butyl ether 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 156-60-5 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 110-54-3 n-Hexane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-34-3 1,l-Dichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-05-4 Vinyl acetate 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 141-78-6 Ethyl acetate 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 78-93-3 Methyl Ethyl Ketone 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 156-59-2 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 540-59-0 1,2-Dichloroethene, Total 0.40 U 0.40 0.40 67-66-3 Chloroform 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 109-99-9 Tetrahydrofuran 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 71-55-6 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 110-82-7 Cyclohexane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 56-23-5 Carbon tetrachloride 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 540-84-1 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 FORM I TO-15 Page 275 of 407 3/7/2019 FORM I AIR - GC/MS VOA ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: TestAmerica Burlington Job No. : 200-47377-1 SDG No. : Client Sample ID: 6486 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-7 is}gym Matrix: Air Lab File ID: 34571-12.D Analysis Method: TO-15 Date Collected: 02/12/2019 00:00 Sample wt/vol: 200 (mL) Date Analyzed: 02/13/2019 22:13 Soil Aliquot Vol: Dilution Factor: 1 Soil Extract Vol. : GC Column: RTX-624 ID: 0.32 (mm) % Moisture: Level: (low/med) Low Analysis Batch No. : 139960 Units: ppb v/v CAS NO. COMPOUND NAME RESULT Q RL RL 71-43-2 Benzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 107-06-2 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 142-82-5 n-Heptane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 79-01-6 Trichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 80-62-6 Methyl methacrylate 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 78-87-5 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 123-91-1 1,4-Dioxane 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 75-27-4 Bromodichloromethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 10061-01-5 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 IIP 108-10-1 methyl isobutyl ketone 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 108-88-3 Toluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 10061-02-6 trans-l,3-Dichloropropene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 79-00-5 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 127-18-4 Tetrachloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 591-78-6 Methyl Butyl Ketone (2-Hexanone) 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 124-48-1 Dibromochloromethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 106-93-4 1,2-Dibromoethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-90-7 Chlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 100-41-4 Ethylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 179601-23-1 m,p-Xylene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 95-47-6 Xylene, o- 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 1330-20-7 Xylene (total) 0.70 U 0.70 0.70 100-42-5 Styrene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-25-2 Bromoform 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 98-82-8 Cumene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 79-34-5 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 103-65-1 n-Propylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 622-96-8 4-Ethyltoluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-67-8 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 95-49-8 2-Chlorotoluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 98-06-6 tert-Butylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 95-63-6 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 135-98-8 sec-Butylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 99-87-6 4-Isopropyltoluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 541-73-1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 106-46-7 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 FORM I TO-15 Page 276 of 407 3/7/2019 FORM I AIR - GC/MS VOA ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: TestAmerica Burlington Job No. : 200-47377-1 SDG No. : Client Sample ID: 6486 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-7 i-." Matrix: Air Lab File ID: 34571-12.D Analysis Method: TO-15 Date Collected: 02/12/2019 00:00 Sample wt/vol: 200 (mL) Date Analyzed: 02/13/2019 22:13 Soil Aliquot Vol: Dilution Factor: 1 Soil Extract Vol. : GC Column: RTX-624 ID: 0.32 (mm) Moisture: Level: (low/med) Low Analysis Batch No. : 139960 Units: ppb v/v CAS NO. COMPOUND NAME RESULT Q RL RL 100-44-7 Benzyl chloride 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 104-51-8 n-Butylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 95-50-1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 120-82-1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 87-68-3 Hexachlorobutadiene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 91-20-3 Naphthalene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 • FORM I TO-15 Page 277 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:39:05 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 TestAmerica Burlington Target Compound Quantitation Report Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-12.D Lims ID: 200-47377-A-7 Client ID: 6486 Sample Type: Client Inject. Date: 13-Feb-2019 22:13:30 ALS Bottle#: 11 Worklist Smp#: 12 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Sample Info: 200-0034571-012 Misc. Info.: 47377-07 Operator ID: ggg Instrument ID: CHB.i Method: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\TO15_LLNJ_TO3.m Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Last Update: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:35 Calib Date: 13-Feb-2019 03:59:30 Integrator: RTE ID Type: Deconvolution ID Quant Method: Internal/External Standard Quant By: Initial Calibration Last ICal File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190212-34558.b\34558-14.D Column 1 : RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Det: MS SCAN Process Host: CTX0307 First Level Reviewer: bunmaa Date: 14-Feb-2019 11:26:44 RT Adj RT Dlt RT OnCol Amt Compound Sig (min.) (min.) (min.) Q Response ppb v/v Flags 1 Propene 41 3.135 ND 2 Dichlorodifluoromethane 85 3.193 ND 3 Chlorodifluoromethane 51 3.231 ND 111 4 1,2-Dichloro-1,1,2,2-tetra 85 3.412 ND 5 Chloromethane 50 3.535 ND 6 Butane 43 3.711 ND MU 7 Vinyl chloride 62 3.743 ND 8 Butadiene 54 3.807 ND 10 Bromomethane 94 4.463 ND 11 Chloroethane 64 4.693 ND 13 Vinyl bromide 106 5.099 ND 14 Trichlorofluoromethane 101 5.205 ND 16 Ethanol 45 5.659 ND 191,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trif 101 6.225 ND 20 1,1-Dichloroethene 96 6.294 ND 21 Acetone 43 6.438 ND 22 Isopropyl alcohol 45 6.668 ND 23 Carbon disulfide 76 6.721 ND 24 3-Chloro-1-propene 41 6.988 ND 27 Methylene Chloride 49 7.244 ND MU 28 2-Methyl-2-propanol 59 7.367 ND 29 Methyl tert-butyl ether 73 7.602 ND 30 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 61 7.655 ND 32 Hexane 57 7.996 7.986 0.010 93 4189 0.1284 33 1,1-Dichloroethane 63 8.391 ND 34 Vinyl acetate 43 8.402 ND 36 2-Butanone (MEK) 72 9.277 ND 37 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 96 9.293 ND 35 Ethyl acetate 88 9.293 ND 39 Chlorobromomethane 128 9.656 9.662 -0.006 86 181143 10.0 38 Tetrahydrofuran 42 9.678 ND Page 278 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:39:05 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-12.D RT Adj RT Dlt RT OnCol Amt Compound Sig (min.) (min.) (min.) Q Response ppb v/v Flags 40 Chloroform 83 9.736 ND 42 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 97 9.992 ND S 41 1,2-Dichloroethene, Total 61 10.000 ND 43 Cyclohexane 84 10.014 ND 44 Carbon tetrachloride 117 10.201 ND 45 Isooctane 57 10.489 ND 46 Benzene 78 10.526 ND MU 47 1,2-Dichloroethane 62 10.622 ND 48 n-Heptane 43 10.740 ND * 50 1,4-Difluorobenzene 114 11.060 11.065 -0.005 94 790825 10.0 53 Trichloroethene 95 11.439 ND 54 1,2-Dichloropropane 63 11.802 ND 55 Methyl methacrylate 69 11.839 ND 56 1,4-Dioxane 88 11.930 ND 57 Dibromomethane 174 11.988 ND U 58 Dichlorobromomethane 83 12.159 ND 60 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 75 12.789 ND 61 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK 43 12.933 ND 64 Toluene 92 13.221 ND 66 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 75 13.579 ND U 67 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 83 13.851 ND 68 Tetrachloroethene 166 13.995 ND 69 2-Hexanone 43 14.113 ND 70 Chlorodibromomethane 129 14.406 ND IS ill 71 Ethylene Dibromide 107 14.609 ND * 72 Chlorobenzene-d5 117 15.169 15.175 -0.006 84 696688 10.0 73 Chlorobenzene 112 15.212 ND 74 Ethylbenzene 91 15.281 15.281 0.000 92 3047 0.0347 76 m-Xylene& p-Xylene 106 15.431 ND U 78 o-Xylene 106 15.943 ND 79 Styrene 104 15.964 ND S 77 Xylenes, Total 106 16.000 ND 80 Bromoform 173 16.258 ND 81 lsopropylbenzene 105 16.354 ND 83 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 83 16.760 ND 84 N-Propylbenzene 91 16.840 ND U 87 4-Ethyltoluene 105 16.962 ND 88 2-Chlorotoluene 91 17.005 ND 89 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 105 17.032 ND 91 tert-Butylbenzene 119 17.400 ND 92 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 105 17.475 ND 93 sec-Butylbenzene 105 17.662 ND 94 4-Isopropyltoluene 119 17.811 ND 95 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 146 17.886 ND 96 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 146 17.998 ND 97 Benzyl chloride 91 18.147 ND 99 n-Butylbenzene 91 18.318 ND 100 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 146 18.484 ND 103 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 180 20.826 ND U 104 Hexachlorobutadiene 225 20.997 ND 105 Naphthalene 128 21.296 ND U Page 279 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:39:05 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 QC Flag Legend Review Flags M-Manually Integrated U - Marked Undetected Reagents: ATTO15BISs_00007 Amount Added: 20.00 Units: mL Run Reagent I Page 280 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date:14-Feb-2019 10:39:05 Chrom Revision:2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 TestAmerica Burlington x+11. Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-12.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 22:13:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Operator ID: ggg Lims ID: 200-47377-A-7 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-7 Worklist Smp#: 12 Client ID: 6486 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil.Factor: 1.0000 ALS Bottle#: 11 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: Al_TO15_ICAL Column:RTX-624(0.32 mm) Y Scaling:Method Defined:Scale to the Nth Largest Target:1 1 34571-12[MS SCAN Chro]:Total F co vi 1 N C) c 1 + N c UD N OQ .......... 1t c 0 m N G 1s N 0 O O 0 N a •: 0;0 O ON O c X .mac } 0 E 0 a 0 IE U Lila)halm! Lu I W I IiI NI III U 1 Inlu11 nu PX N II IIIIOIIII Iill. I uUIJIIII II lilt III 11111 eI1 1111 1 Inu 1111111 uq1 11 IIIY 11 101111 111111 11111 I UUI 111 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 Min Page 281 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:39:05 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-12.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 22:13:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-7 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-7 Client ID: 6486 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 11 Worklist Smp#: 12 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 =g Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 6 Butane, CAS: 106-97-8 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 136(3.71) m/z 43.0 1, 8• o 0 1 71 m o_ 0 5� X 11 >_ } 4 43 2: 41 44 1 3.6 ` Min 40 42 44 46 48 50 RT 1 m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 136(3.71),Qvalue=1 m/z 41.0 (0 1, 35 cp 0 1 2 X1111 X 21 >- >- 1 43" 11 41� 44� 3.6 i Min 40 42 44 46 48 50 FT I m/7 11 Ref Spec: 6 Butane (NIST) m/z 58.0 43 T 5' • •E C o_ X X >- 41"' 40 42 44 46 48 50 3.6 Min RT Mass Response Amount 3.71 43.00 696 0.037703 3.71 41.00 341 3.71 58.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:24:28 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 282 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:39:05 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-12.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 22:13:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-7 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-7 Client ID: 6486 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 11 Worklist Smp#: 12 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 27 Methylene Chloride, CAS: 75-09-2 Processing Results 1 Raw Spec:Scan 799(7.24) m/z 49.0 2 v 11 0 21 0 0 X X 1 >- i } 11 44N 49N 84N i 7.1 Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 FT 1 m/7 1 Enhanced Spec:Scan 799(7.24),Qvalue=1 31 m/z 84.0 11 2 0 • o _0 21MI X X 1 11 44N 49N 84N — 7.1 i Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 FT I m/7 Ref Spec: 27 Methylene Chloride (NIST) m/z 86.0 11 / o 49 2 m C 0 o 21 0 84\ X 1 x X86 } 11 X51 47NG I I i I _ I 7.1 i Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 FT I RT Mass Response Amount 7.24 49.00 226 0.012857 7.24 84.00 180 7.24 86.00 89 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:24:58 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 283 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:39:05 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-12.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 22:13:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-7 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-7 Client ID: 6486 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 11 Worklist Smp#: 12 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: 1015LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 46 Benzene, CAS: 71-43-2 Processing Results 1 Raw Spec:Scan 1413(10.52) m/z 78.0 7 ci 11 61 0 o_ 0 4: X ' 78N X - 3: >- i 2, • 44N 1 51 ' i 10.4 10.7 i Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 PT I m/7 Amdis Enhanced Spec:Scan 1413(10.52),Qvalue=81 m/z 77.0 i 91 78 2 7: 21 IP x 6 x 1 >- 5 >- 11 3* 51N 2: i 1 10.4 10.7 i Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 VT 4 m/7 11 Ref Spec: 46 Benzene (NIST) 78 0 0 o _ X ; 77' 552 38Ni I I i I . 76. 1 79 1 . I I i . 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 RT Mass Response Amount 10.52 78.00 1022 0.017815 10.52 77.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:25:33 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 284 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:39:05 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-12.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 22:13:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-7 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-7 Client ID: 6486 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 11 Worklist Smp#: 12 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL DO. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJTO3 Limit Group: Al_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 66 trans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene, CAS: 10061-02-6 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 1970(13.49) m/z 75.0 2, 207 31 • c 212. o _o 1: X 1: >- >- 1 1 : • 96\ 133 191\ 13.4 13.7 i I I.. .. .i �.i I. Min i 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 ilT I m/7 Amdis Enhanced Spec:Scan 1970(13.49),Qvalue=40 m/z 110.0 91 207 T 7 • fl; MI 1 96\ 191 133 ,_ l.. ... la . 1. 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 13.4 13.7 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 66 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene (NIST) 75 0 0 0 X -39 77N -49 I_ x.1112. ..Li. _._._ ..I i 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 RT Mass Response Amount 13.49 75.00 483 0.016776 13.58 110.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:25:51 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 285 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:39:05 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-12.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 22:13:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-7 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-7 Client ID: 6486 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 11 Worklist Smp#: 12 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 76 m-Xylene & p-Xylene, CAS: 179601-23-1 Processing Results 1 Raw Spec:Scan 2306(15.29) m/z 106.0 91 6• o° N 1 5 'xi o 0 11 0 4, X >7< 3 } • 106N } •2 X44 117N 11 n6 15.2 15.5 ` Min , 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 104 108 112 116 120 FT i m/7 , 1 Enhanced Spec:Scan 2306(15.29),Qvalue=0 m/z 91.0 91 00 1 1 id o o 0 11 o c X X al } 106N } ' • X44 117N 77`1 i 15.2 15.5 Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 104 108 112 116 120 FT 1 m17 RT Mass Response Amount 15.29 106.00 950 0.026944 15.28 91.00 3047 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:26:10 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 286 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:39:05 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-12.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 22:13:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-7 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-7 Client ID: 6486 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 11 Worklist Smp#: 12 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: T015LLNJT03 Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 84 N-Propylbenzene, CAS: 103-65-1 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 2553(16.60) m/z 91.0 21 95 174 ' /176 5 0 1: 1 'S X X 1 75N • 50" 74N 94� X96 -d I • I. 177 fill 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 16.6 16.9 m/7 Min Amdis Enhanced Spec:Scan 2553(16.60),Qvalue=36 m/z 120.0 91 95 174 \176 7: •E • o X 6 } 5 >- 75N 3• 2: 50� 1 I 74NI' 94 X96 X177 l I 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 16.6 16.9 m17 Min 1 Ref Spec: 84 N-Propylbenzene (NIST) m/z 92.0 91 T O C o_ X X • } 120'" 65" X92 A.. --_..I. .--.I. _...-- --- 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 16.6 16.9 Min RT Mass Response Amount 16.60 91.00 1527 0.013658 16.83 120.00 0 16.62 92.00 12464 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:26:20 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 287 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:39:05 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 'ti` < User Disabled Compound Report ,. TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-12.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 22:13:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-7 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-7 Client ID: 6486 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 11 Worklist Smp#: 12 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_T03 Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 103 1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene, CAS: 120-82-1 Processing Results 1 Raw Spec:Scan 3349(20.85) 2 m/z 180.0 v 11 21 �' 0 _0 1: X X 1 207 } • '44 • 182 — 20.6 20.9 Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 FT 1 m/7 1 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3349(20.85),Qvalue=1 31 m/z 182.0 _ 11 2 • 0 X. 21 X X41110 1 } } 207 11 • '44 182 1 20.6 20.9 i Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 FT 1 m/7 11 Ref Spec: 1031,2,4-Trichloroberizene (NIST) 180 182 0 0 0 X 145 ' '184 109" 147 74i I X73 X75 1.Ii._o. .� 1.84I�.. L.._ ..�IL .11,1-146. I I a i 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 RT Mass Response Amount 20.85 180.00 431 0.010135 20.84 182.00 330 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:26:37 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 288 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:39:06 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-12.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 22:13:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-7 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-7 Client ID: 6486 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 11 Worklist Smp#: 12 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 105 Naphthalene, CAS: 91-20-3 Processing Results 1 Raw Spec:Scan 3436(21.32) m/z 128.0 40 35 1 7? cD 1i o 2: X X 21 >- >- 1' 207N 44 1281 21.2 Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 IpT m/7 1 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3436(21.32),Qvalue=1 40 1 c3 0 11 41, } 207N I_44 1281 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 m/7 1 Ref Spec: 105 Naphthalene (NIST) 128 X • 64 II _.._.102NI. 127 Il 1-129 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 RT Mass Response Amount 21.32 128.00 217 0.002818 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 11:26:41 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 289 of 407 3/7/2019 FORM I AIR - GC/MS VOA ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: TestAmerica Burlington Job No. : 200-47377-1 SDG No. : Client Sample ID: 4860 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-8 4 Matrix: Air Lab File ID: 34571-13.D Analysis Method: TO-15 Date Collected: 02/12/2019 00:00 Sample wt/vol: 200 (mL) Date Analyzed: 02/13/2019 23:06 Soil Aliquot Vol: Dilution Factor: 1 Soil Extract Vol. : GC Column: RTX-624 ID: 0.32 (mm) Moisture: Level: (low/med) Low Analysis Batch No. : 139960 Units: ppb v/v CAS NO. COMPOUND NAME RESULT Q RL RL 115-07-1 Propylene 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 75-71-8 Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-45-6 Freon 22 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 76-14-2 1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 74-87-3 Chloromethane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 106-97-8 n-Butane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-01-4 Vinyl chloride 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 106-99-0 1,3-Butadiene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 74-83-9 Bromomethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 41110 75-00-3 Chloroethane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 593-60-2 Bromoethene(Vinyl Bromide) 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-69-4 Trichlorofluoromethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 64-17-5 Ethanol 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 76-13-1 Freon TF 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-35-4 1,1-Dichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 67-64-1 Acetone 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 67-63-0 Isopropyl alcohol 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 75-15-0 Carbon disulfide 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 107-05-1 3-Chloropropene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-09-2 Methylene Chloride 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-65-0 tert-Butyl alcohol 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 1634-04-4 Methyl tert-butyl ether 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 156-60-5 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 110-54-3 n-Hexane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-34-3 l,l-Dichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-05-4 Vinyl acetate 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 141-78-6 Ethyl acetate 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 78-93-3 Methyl Ethyl Ketone 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 156-59-2 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 540-59-0 1,2-Dichloroethene, Total 0.40 U 0.40 0.40 67-66-3 Chloroform 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 109-99-9 Tetrahydrofuran 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 71-55-6 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 110-82-7 Cyclohexane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 56-23-5 Carbon tetrachloride 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 540-84-1 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 FORM I TO-15 Page 290 of 407 3/7/2019 FORM I AIR - GC/MS VOA ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: TestAmerica Burlington Job No. : 200-47377-1 SDG No. : Client Sample ID: 4860 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-8 ,+` Matrix: Air Lab File ID: 34571-13.D Analysis Method: TO-15 Date Collected: 02/12/2019 00:00 Sample wt/vol: 200 (mL) Date Analyzed: 02/13/2019 23:06 Soil Aliquot Vol: Dilution Factor: 1 Soil Extract Vol. : GC Column: RTX-624 ID: 0.32 (mm) % Moisture: Level: (low/med) Low Analysis Batch No. : 139960 Units: ppb v/v CAS NO. COMPOUND NAME RESULT Q RL RL 71-43-2 Benzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 107-06-2 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 142-82-5 n-Heptane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 79-01-6 Trichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 ., 80-62-6 Methyl methacrylate 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 78-87-5 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 123-91-1 1,4-Dioxane 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 75-27-4 Bromodichloromethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20111 10061-01-5 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-10-1 methyl isobutyl ketone 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 108-88-3 Toluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 10061-02-6 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 79-00-5 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 127-18-4 Tetrachloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 591-78-6 Methyl Butyl Ketone (2-Hexanone) 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 124-48-1 Dibromochloromethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 106-93-4 1,2-Dibromoethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-90-7 Chlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 100-41-4 Ethylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 179601-23-1 m,p-Xylene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 95-47-6 Xylene, o- 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 1330-20-7 Xylene (total) 0.70 U 0.70 0.70 100-42-5 Styrene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-25-2 Bromoform 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 98-82-8 Cumene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 79-34-5 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 103-65-1 n-Propylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 622-96-8 4-Ethyltoluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-67-8 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 95-49-8 2-Chlorotoluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 98-06-6 tert-Butylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 95-63-6 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 135-98-8 sec-Butylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 99-87-6 4-Isopropyltoluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 541-73-1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 106-46-7 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 FORM I TO-15 Page 291 of 407 3/7/2019 FORM I AIR - GC/MS VOA ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: TestAmerica Burlington Job No. : 200-47377-1 SDG No. : Client Sample ID: 4860 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-8 Matrix: Air Lab File ID: 34571-13.D Analysis Method: TO-15 Date Collected: 02/12/2019 00:00 Sample wt/vol: 200 (mL) Date Analyzed: 02/13/2019 23:06 Soil Aliquot Vol: Dilution Factor: 1 Soil Extract Vol. : GC Column: RTX-624 ID: 0.32 (mm) Moisture: Level: (low/med) Low Analysis Batch No. : 139960 Units: ppb v/v CAS NO. COMPOUND NAME RESULT Q RL RL 100-44-7 Benzyl chloride 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 104-51-8 n-Butylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 95-50-1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 120-82-1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 87-68-3 Hexachlorobutadiene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 91-20-3 Naphthalene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 1011 FORM I TO-15 Page 292 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:39:07 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 TestAmerica Burlington Target Compound Quantitation Report Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-13.D Lims ID: 200-47377-A-8 Client ID: 4860 Sample Type: Client Inject. Date: 13-Feb-2019 23:06:30 ALS Bottle#: 12 Worklist Smp#: 13 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Sample Info: 200-0034571-013 Misc. Info.: 47377-08 Operator ID: ggg Instrument ID: CHB.i Method: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\TO15_LLNJ_TO3.m Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Last Update: 14-Feb-2019 10:38:35 Calib Date: 13-Feb-2019 03:59:30 Integrator: RTE ID Type: Deconvolution ID Quant Method: Internal/External Standard Quant By: Initial Calibration Last ICal File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190212-34558.b\34558-14.D Column 1 : RTX-624 ( 0.32 mm) Det: MS SCAN Process Host: CTX0307 First Level Reviewer: bunmaa Date: 14-Feb-2019 12:10:13 RT Adj RT Dlt RT OnCol Amt Compound Sig (min.) (min.) (min.) Q Response ppb v/v Flags 1 Propene 41 3.135 ND 2 Dichlorodifluoromethane 85 3.193 ND 3 Chlorodifluoromethane 51 3.231 NDEl 4 1,2-Dichloro-1,1,2,2-tetra 85 3.412 ND 5 Chloromethane 50 3.535 ND 6 Butane 43 3.711 ND 7 Vinyl chloride 62 3.743 ND 8 Butadiene 54 3.807 ND 10 Bromomethane 94 4.463 ND 11 Chloroethane 64 4.693 ND 13 Vinyl bromide 106 5.099 ND 14 Trichlorofluoromethane 101 5.205 ND 16 Ethanol 45 5.659 ND 19 1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trif 101 6.225 ND 20 1,1-Dichloroethene 96 6.294 ND 21 Acetone 43 6.438 ND 22 Isopropyl alcohol 45 6.668 ND 23 Carbon disulfide 76 6.721 ND 24 3-Chloro-1-propene 41 6.988 ND 27 Methylene Chloride 49 7.244 ND U 28 2-Methyl-2-propanol 59 7.367 ND 29 Methyl tert-butyl ether 73 7.602 ND 30 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 61 7.655 ND 32 Hexane 57 7.991 7.986 0.005 89 4330 0.1336 33 1,1-Dichloroethane 63 8.391 ND 34 Vinyl acetate 43 8.402 ND 36 2-Butanone (MEK) 72 9.277 ND 37 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 96 9.293 ND 35 Ethyl acetate 88 9.293 ND * 39 Chlorobromomethane 128 9.656 9.662 -0.006 86 179989 10.0 38 Tetrahydrofuran 42 9.678 ND Page 293 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:39:07 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-13.D RT Adj RT Dlt RT OnCol Amt Compound Sig (min.) (min.) (min.) Q Response ppb v/v Flags 40 Chloroform 83 9.736 ND 42 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 97 9.992 ND S 41 1,2-Dichloroethene, Total 61 10.000 ND 43 Cyclohexane 84 10.014 ND 44 Carbon tetrachloride 117 10.201 ND 45 Isooctane 57 10.489 ND 46 Benzene 78 10.526 ND 47 1,2-Dichloroethane 62 10.622 ND 48 n-Heptane 43 10.740 ND * 50 1,4-Difluorobenzene 114 11.060 11.065 -0.005 94 788841 10.0 53 Trichloroethene 95 11.439 ND 54 1,2-Dichloropropane 63 11.802 ND 55 Methyl methacrylate 69 11.839 ND 56 1,4-Dioxane 88 11.930 ND 57 Dibromomethane 174 11.988 ND U 58 Dichlorobromomethane 83 12.159 ND 60 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 75 12.789 ND 61 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK 43 12.933 ND 64 Toluene 92 13.232 13.221 0.011 89 972 0.0229 7M 66 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 75 13.579 ND 67 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 83 13.851 ND 68 Tetrachloroethene 166 13.995 ND 69 2-Hexanone 43 14.113 ND 70 Chlorodibromomethane 129 14.406 ND 111.1 71 Ethylene Dibromide 107 14.609 ND * 72 Chlorobenzene-d5 117 15.169 15.175 -0.006 84 689231 10.0 73 Chlorobenzene 112 15.212 ND 74 Ethylbenzene 91 15.281 15.281 0.000 92 2692 0.0310 76 m-Xylene& p-Xylene 106 15.431 ND U 78 o-Xylene 106 15.943 ND 79 Styrene 104 15.964 ND S 77 Xylenes, Total 106 16.000 ND 80 Bromoform 173 16.258 ND 81 lsopropylbenzene 105 16.354 ND 83 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 83 16.760 ND 84 N-Propylbenzene 91 16.840 ND U 87 4-Ethyltoluene 105 16.962 ND 88 2-Chlorotoluene 91 17.005 ND 89 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 105 17.032 ND 91 tert-Butylbenzene 119 17.400 ND 92 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 105 17.475 ND 93 sec-Butylbenzene 105 17.662 ND 94 4-Isopropyltoluene 119 17.811 ND 95 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 146 17.886 ND U 96 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 146 17.998 ND U 97 Benzyl chloride 91 18.147 ND 99 n-Butylbenzene 91 18.318 ND 100 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 146 18.484 ND 103 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 180 20.826 ND 104 Hexachlorobutadiene 225 20.997 ND 105 Naphthalene 128 21.296 ND U Page 294 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:39:07 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 QC Flag Legend Processing Flags 7- Failed Limit of Detection Review Flags M - Manually Integrated U -Marked Undetected Reagents: ATTO15BISs_00007 Amount Added: 20.00 Units: mL Run Reagent +kr9 Page 295 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date:14-Feb-2019 10:39:07 Chrom Revision:2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-13.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 23:06:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Operator ID: ggg Lims ID: 200-47377-A-8 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-8 Worklist Smp#: 13 Client ID: 4860 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil.Factor: 1.0000 ALS Bottle#: 12 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column:RTX-624(0.32 mm) Y Scaling:Method Defined:Scale to the Nth Largest Target:1 ' 1¢ 34571-13[MS SCAN Chro]:Total c 13- v 12' + c O y � a O o 11- t m U 10- a 2 V O oi p O $ C X $ ry. 0 E 0 F5 � L 4 1- I LLII El 1111 ■ull WI Y ME Y 1I[LJI II IWMI tut 1 W fill Jul 1110111 I 11 II Y IIIIUI1 took. 111 1I t III IN III. MI III me I I uu Int 1111011 ■ 1111111 10111 1 nlllp Q I 1 1 I I I 1 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 Min Page 296 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:39:07 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-13.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 23:06:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-8 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-8 Client ID: 4860 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 12 Worklist Smp#: 13 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15LLNJ_T03 Limit Group: Al_TO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 27 Methylene Chloride, CAS: 75-09-2 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 799(7.24) m/z 49.0 11 2, 21 0 o 01: X X ;- 1 44N49N _ 7.1 i Min 40 42 44 46 48 50 FT I m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 799(7.24),Qvalue=1 m/z 84.0 1121 I / 1: X X ala1 >- i } • 44 49N G 7.1 i Min 40 42 44 46 48 50 FT I m/7 , 11 Ref Spec: 27 Methylene Chloride (NIST) m/z 86.0 49 T • •_ O C o 5<- >'R X } i t t 40 42 44 46 48 50 7.1 Min RT Mass Response Amount 7.24 49.00 161 0.009218 7.24 84.00 0 7.24 86.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 12:06:11 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 297 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:39:07 Chrom Revision:2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 Manual Integration/User Assign Peak Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-13.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 23:06:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-8 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-8 Client ID: 4860 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 12 Worklist Smp#: 13 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: Al_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 64 Toluene, CAS: 108-88-3 Signal: 1 Processing Integration Results RT: 13.23 m/z 92.0 Area: 481 4: N. Amount: 0.011326 4, i•' Amount Units: ppb v/v 41 3: 3 0 x 2: >- 2, 21 11 1 • 12.9 13.1 13.3 13.5 Min Manual Integration Results RT: 13.23 m/z 92.0 Area: 972 48- ra Amount: 0.022888 44- Amount Units: ppb v/v 40- 3e- 32- 0-30-32 • 0 28- .... v.. 24- >- 20- 4- 20' 10 12- 0 I 1 i 12.9 13.1 13.3 13.5 Min RT Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 12:07:08 Audit Action: Manually Integrated Audit Reason:Assign Peak Page 298 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:39:07 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-13.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 23:06:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-8 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-8 Client ID: 4860 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 12 Worklist Smp#: 13 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AI_TO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 76 m-Xylene & p-Xylene, CAS: 179601-23-1 Processing Results 1 Raw Spec:Scan 2308(15.30) m/z 106.0 11 w 91 •E X X } i >- 117 117 106 -44 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 104 108 112 116 120 15.3 m/7 Min 1 Enhanced Spec:Scan 2308(15.30),Qvalue=0 m/z 91.0 11 91 ' X X 117 106" -44 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 104 108 112 116 120 15.3 m/7 Min RT Mass Response Amount 15.30 106.00 275 0.007884 15.43 91.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 12:07:23 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 299 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:39:07 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-13.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 23:06:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-8 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-8 Client ID: 4860 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 12 Worklist Smp#: 13 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJTO3 Limit Group: Al_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 84 N-Propylbenzene, CAS: 103-65-1 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 2554(16.61) m/z 91.0 i 0 2, 95 174 \176 o •E 0 21 c x 11 x } 1 75N > . 50N1 � 1 7�� I 94\I X96 X177 .u.. .., 1- .5.w- - ..i 1..i.i. -11 -d 1- - 11 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 16.7 17.0 m/7 Min Amdis Enhanced Spec:Scan 2554(16.61),Qvalue=36 m/z 120.0 91 95 174 \ 176 7: c X 6 X Mill >- 5 >- 75N 3• 2: 1 50 1 74\ 94Nr96 / .u. ....,11- . .h. .II..J i..�... II SII 1. 11. 177 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 16.7 17.0 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 84 N-Propylbenzene (NIST) m/z 92.0 91 T E c o_ X X } 120' .i 65N.J. 78\L --..I'92 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 16.7 17.0 Min RT Mass Response Amount 16.61 91.00 1394 0.012603 16.83 120.00 0 16.61 92.00 12553 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 12:07:33 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 300 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:39:07 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-13.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 23:06:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-8 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-8 Client ID: 4860 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 12 Worklist Smp#: 13 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 95 1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene, CAS: 541-73-1 Processing Results 1 Raw Spec:Scan 2815(18.00) m/z 146.0 11 _o C X X >- L } -44 146 207 i 1 1 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 17.8 m/7 Min 1 Enhanced Spec:Scan 2815(18.00),Qvalue=1 m/z 111.0 11 Y o E • o X X MI >- i >- -44 146 207' i 1 1 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 17.8 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 95 1,3-Dichlorobenzene (NIST) m/z 148.0 146 a • .E S o 148 x X } 111 75 50 I� 73\� (113 r150 ..I L 151,x.._ I. _IL.. ..III. hi rr i 1 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 17.8 Min RT Mass Response Amount 18.00 146.00 69 0.001178 17.89 111.00 0 17.89 148.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 12:07:40 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 301 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:39:07 Chrom Revision:2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-13.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 23:06:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-8 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-8 Client ID: 4860 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 12 Worklist Smp#: 13 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 96 1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene, CAS: 106-46-7 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 2817(18.01) m/z 146.0 8, 2, 21 0 7 1: T< 61 x ›- 4: r44 } 1 3: 207N 2, 146N 1 17.9 Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 FT 1 m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 2817(18.01),Qvalue=1 m/z 111.0 8, 7 cIMO o 5 x 61 x } 4: 744 >- 3• 207" 2, 146N 1 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 17.9 m!7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 96 1,4-Dichlorobenzene (NIST) m/z 148.0 146 • 'c o 5 C3 '148 X x • } • 111" 50� 75- .1 .1, ..I1. ... _.. x113 .I 11'150 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 17.9 Min RT Mass Response Amount 18.01 146.00 80 0.001373 18.00 111.00 0 18.00 148.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 12:07:42 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 302 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 14-Feb-2019 10:39:07 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190213-34571.b\34571-13.D Injection Date: 13-Feb-2019 23:06:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-8 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-8 Client ID: 4860 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 12 Worklist Smp#: 13 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15LLNJTO3 Limit Group: Al_TO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 105 Naphthalene, CAS: 91-20-3 Processing Results 1 Raw Spec:Scan 3437(21.32) m/z 128.0 co 2 M, 11 21 O O X ><- ; 207N } 11 44 128N 21.2 Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 FT m/7 1 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3437(21.32),Qvalue=1 . ! 1I; Ea } 207" X44 128"' 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 m/7 11 Ref Spec: 105 Naphthalene (NIST) 128 • X . .102i 127N I. 129 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 RT Mass Response Amount 21.32 128.00 88 0.001155 Reviewer: bunmaa, 14-Feb-2019 12:07:50 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 303 of 407 3/7/2019 FORM I AIR - GC/MS VOA ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: TestAmerica Burlington Job No. : 200-47377-1 SDG No. : Client Sample ID: 4843 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-9 g Matrix: Air Lab File ID: 34588-06.D Analysis Method: TO-15 Date Collected: 02/12/2019 00:00 Sample wt/vol: 200 (mL) Date Analyzed: 02/14/2019 15:49 Soil Aliquot Vol: Dilution Factor: 1 Soil Extract Vol. : GC Column: RTX-624 ID: 0.32 (mm) % Moisture: Level: (low/med) Low Analysis Batch No. : 139996 Units: ppb v/v CAS NO. COMPOUND NAME RESULT Q RL RL 115-07-1 Propylene 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 75-71-8 Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-45-6 Freon 22 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 : 76-14-2 1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 74-87-3 Chloromethane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 106-97-8 n-Butane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-01-4 Vinyl chloride 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 411 106-99-0 1,3 Butadiene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 74-83-9 Bromomethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-00-3 Chloroethane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 593-60-2 Bromoethene(Vinyl Bromide) 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-69-4 Trichlorofluoromethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 64-17-5 Ethanol 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 76-13-1 Freon TF 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-35-4 1,1-Dichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 67-64-1 Acetone 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 67-63-0 Isopropyl alcohol 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 75-15-0 Carbon disulfide 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 107-05-1 3-Chloropropene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-09-2 Methylene Chloride 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-65-0 tert-Butyl alcohol 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 1634-04-4 Methyl tert-butyl ether 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 156-60-5 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 110-54-3 n-Hexane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-34-3 l,l-Dichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-05-4 Vinyl acetate 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 141-78-6 Ethyl acetate 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 78-93-3 Methyl Ethyl Ketone 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 156-59-2 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 540-59-0 1,2-Dichloroethene, Total 0.40 U 0.40 0.40 67-66-3 Chloroform 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 109-99-9 Tetrahydrofuran 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 71-55-6 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 110-82-7 Cyclohexane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 56-23-5 Carbon tetrachloride 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 540-84-1 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 FORM I TO-15 Page 304 of 407 3/7/2019 FORM I AIR - GC/MS VOA ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: TestAmerica Burlington Job No. : 200-47377-1 SDG No. : Client Sample ID: 4843 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-9 V Matrix: Air Lab File ID: 34588-06.D Analysis Method: TO-15 Date Collected: 02/12/2019 00:00 Sample wt/vol: 200 (mL) Date Analyzed: 02/14/2019 15:49 Soil Aliquot Vol: Dilution Factor: 1 Soil Extract Vol. : GC Column: RTX-624 ID: 0.32 (mm) % Moisture: Level: (low/med) Low Analysis Batch No. : 139996 Units: ppb v/v CAS NO. COMPOUND NAME RESULT Q RL RL 71-43-2 Benzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 107-06-2 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 142-82-5 n-Heptane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 - J 79-01-6 Trichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 .E:'r 80-62-6 Methyl methacrylate 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 78-87-5 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 123-91-1 1,4-Dioxane 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 iio 75-27-4 Bromodichloromethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20al 10061-01-5 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-10-1 methyl isobutyl ketone 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 108-88-3 Toluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 10061-02-6 trans-l,3-Dichloropropene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 79-00-5 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 127-18-4 Tetrachloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 591-78-6 Methyl Butyl Ketone (2-Hexanone) 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 124-48-1 Dibromochloromethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 106-93-4 1,2-Dibromoethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-90-7 Chlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 100-41-4 Ethylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 179601-23-1 m,p-Xylene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 95-47-6 Xylene, o- 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 1330-20-7 Xylene (total) 0.70 U 0.70 0.70 100-42-5 Styrene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-25-2 Bromoform 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 98-82-8 Cumene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 79-34-5 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 103-65-1 n-Propylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 622-96-8 4-Ethyltoluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-67-8 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 95-49-8 2-Chlorotoluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 98-06-6 tert-Butylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 95-63-6 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 135-98-8 sec-Butylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 99-87-6 4-Isopropyltoluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 541-73-1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 106-46-7 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 FORM I TO-15 Page 305 of 407 3/7/2019 FORM I AIR - GC/MS VOA ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: TestAmerica Burlington Job No. : 200-47377-1 SDG No. : Client Sample ID: 4843 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-9 Matrix: Air Lab File ID: 34588-06.D Analysis Method: TO-15 Date Collected: 02/12/2019 00:00 Sample wt/vol: 200 (mL) Date Analyzed: 02/14/2019 15:49 Soil Aliquot Vol: Dilution Factor: 1 Soil Extract Vol. : GC Column: RTX-624 ID: 0.32 (mm) Moisture: Level: (low/med) Low Analysis Batch No. : 139996 Units: ppb v/v CAS NO. COMPOUND NAME RESULT Q RL RL 100-44-7 Benzyl chloride 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 104-51-8 n-Butylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 95-50-1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 120-82-1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.50 U * 0.50 0.50 87-68-3 Hexachlorobutadiene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 91-20-3 Naphthalene 0.50 U * 0.50 0.50 4110 FORM I TO-15 Page 306 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:13:00 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 TestAmerica Burlington Target Compound Quantitation Report Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-06.D Lims ID: 200-47377-A-9 Client ID: 4843 Sample Type: Client Inject. Date: 14-Feb-2019 15:49:30 ALS Bottle#: 6 Worklist Smp#: 6 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Sample Info: 200-0034588-006 Misc. Info.: 47377-09 Operator ID: ggg Instrument ID: CHX.i Method: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\TO15MasterMethodX.m.m Limit Group: Al_TO15_ICAL Last Update: 15-Feb-2019 14:12:59 Calib Date: 24-Jan-2019 08:07:30 Integrator: RTE ID Type: Deconvolution ID Quant Method: Internal Standard Quant By: Initial Calibration Last ICal File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190123-34274.b\34274-17.D Column 1 : RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Det: MS SCAN Process Host: CTX0331 First Level Reviewer: bunmaa Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:12:59 RT Adj RT Dlt RT OnCol Amt Compound Sig (min.) (min.) (min.) Q Response ppb v/v Flags 1 Propene 41 4.078 ND U 2 Dichlorodifluoromethane 85 4.169 ND • 3 Chlorodifluoromethane 51 4.233 ND UMI 41,2-Dichloro-1,1,2,2-tetra 85 4.506 ND 5 Chloromethane 50 4.693 ND U 6 Butane 43 4.923 ND U 7 Vinyl chloride 62 4.977 ND 8 Butadiene 54 5.068 ND U 10 Bromomethane 94 5.859 ND 11 Chloroethane 64 6.116 ND 13 Vinyl bromide 106 6.539 ND 14 Trichlorofluoromethane 101 6.635 ND 17 Ethanol 45 7.250 7.250 0.027 71 1037 0.1705 M 20 1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trif 101 7.721 ND 21 1,1-Dichloroethene 96 7.791 ND 22 Acetone 43 8.037 ND 23 Carbon disulfide 76 8.208 ND 24 Isopropyl alcohol 45 8.304 ND MU 25 3-Chloro-1-propene 41 8.593 ND 27 Methylene Chloride 49 8.898 ND U 28 2-Methyl-2-propanol 59 9.096 ND 29 Methyl tert-butyl ether 73 9.299 ND 31 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 61 9.347 ND S 30 1,2-Dichloroethene, Total 61 9.665 ND 33 Hexane 57 9.722 ND 34 1,1-Dichloroethane 63 10.251 ND 35 Vinyl acetate 43 10.305 ND 37 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 96 11.369 ND 38 2-Butanone (MEK) 72 11.412 ND 39 Ethyl acetate 88 11.434 ND 40 Chlorobromomethane 128 11.835 11.830 0.005 66 273697 10.0 Page 307 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:13:00 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\Chrom Data\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-06.D RT Adj RT Dlt RT OnCol Amt Compound Sig (min.) (min.) (min.) Q Response ppb v/v Flags 41 Tetrahydrofuran 42 11.835 ND 42 Chloroform 83 11.947 ND 43 Cyclohexane 84 12.193 ND 44 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 97 12.225 ND 45 Carbon tetrachloride 117 12.461 ND 46 Isooctane 57 12.846 ND 47 Benzene 78 12.905 ND U 48 1,2-Dichloroethane 62 13.081 ND 49 n-Heptane 43 13.199 ND * 50 1,4-Difluorobenzene 114 13.675 13.670 0.005 92 1381732 10.0 53 Trichloroethene 95 14.109 ND 54 1,2-Dichloropropane 63 14.622 ND 55 Methyl methacrylate 69 14.740 ND 56 1,4-Dioxane 88 14.815 ND MU 57 Dibromomethane 174 14.863 ND 58 Dichlorobromomethane 83 15.120 ND 60 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 75 15.970 ND 61 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK 43 16.222 ND U 65 Toluene 92 16.516 ND 66 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 75 17.072 ND 67 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 83 17.431 ND 68 Tetrachloroethene 166 17.532 ND 69 2-Hexanone 43 17.837 ND U 71 Chlorodibromomethane 129 18.164 ND AP 72 Ethylene Dibromide 107 18.431 ND * 74 Chlorobenzene-d5 117 19.287 19.282 0.005 84 1153443 10.0 75 Chlorobenzene 112 19.341 ND U 76 Ethylbenzene 91 19.474 ND U S 73 Xylenes, Total 106 19.600 ND 78 m-Xylene& p-Xylene 106 19.715 ND 79 o-Xylene 106 20.517 ND 80 Styrene 104 20.571 ND 81 Bromoform 173 20.978 ND 82lsopropylbenzene 105 21.149 ND 84 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 83 21.775 ND 85 N-Propylbenzene 91 21.833 ND U 88 4-Ethyltoluene 105 22.015 ND 89 2-Chlorotoluene 91 22.031 ND U 90 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 105 22.112 ND U 92 tert-Butylbenzene 119 22.588 ND 93 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 105 22.679 ND MU 94 sec-Butylbenzene 105 22.898 ND U 95 4-Isopropyltoluene 119 23.096 ND U 96 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 146 23.144 23.139 0.005 94 2380 0.0204 97 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 146 23.272 23.273 -0.001 93 2614 0.0236 98 Benzyl chloride 91 23.470 23.470 0.000 94 1457 0.0118 100 n-Butylbenzene 91 23.668 ND MU 101 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 146 23.818 23.813 0.005 92 2385 0.0205 103 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 180 26.370 26.359 0.011 93 3848 0.0715 104 Hexachlorobutadiene 225 26.541 ND 105 Naphthalene 128 26.867 26.862 0.005 96 5184 0.0320 Page 308 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:13:00 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 QC Flag Legend Review Flags M - Manually Integrated U - Marked Undetected Reagents: ATTO15XISs_00002 Amount Added: 20.00 Units: mL Run Reagent ElE1 Page 309 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date:15-Feb-2019 14:13:00 Chrom Revision:2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-06.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 15:49:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Operator ID: ggg Lims ID: 200-47377-A-9 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-9 Worklist Smp#: 6 Client ID: 4843 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil.Factor: 1.0000 ALS Bottle#: 6 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: AITO15_ICAL Column:RTX-624(0.32 mm) Y Scaling:Method Defined:Scale to the Nth Largest Target: 1 1: 34588-06[MS SCAN Chro]:Total coOi 1 a r N <D 'O t+1 d O C C N Gl � 1 C O N O O t o U 1 c 0 1 11 0 o m 0 0 X c m } • Ul C O O • U 3.0 5.0 7.0 9.0 11.0 13.0 15.0 17.0 19.0 21.0 23.0 25.0 27.0 29.0 31.0 Min Page 310 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:13:00 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-06.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 15:49:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-9 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-9 Client ID: 4843 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 6 Worklist Smp#: 6 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 ( 0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 1 Propene, CAS: 115-07-1 Processing Results 6 � Raw Spec:Scan 18(4.08) m/z 41.0 5: 78 30- '717 25- 0 4: 40" 44N 20 ' I I x 41 x - I 1 >- 3 } 15 10- 2, 39N 77N 3.9 4.2 ` Min 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 KT 1 m/7 6 Enhanced Spec:Scan 18(4.08),Qvalue=26 m/z 42.0 78 21 5: • 4: 40N 44 - 0 1: MI x 41 x 1 } 3 2, 39N77N • 1 • 3.9 4.2 i Min 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 it- I m/7 11 Ref Spec: 1 Propene (NIST) 2� m/z 39.0 41 I I i o 21 0 39 /42 0 1: >7 1 II >- } • 38" —I - — , I 3.9 4.2 Min 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 FT I mh RT Mass Response Amount 4.08 41.00 576 0.029407 4.08 42.00 0 4.08 39.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:08:36 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 311 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:13:00 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-06.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 15:49:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-9 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-9 Client ID: 4843 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 6 Worklist Smp#: 6 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: AI_TO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 3 Chlorodifluoromethane, CAS: 75-45-6 Processing Results 6, Raw Spec:Scan 47(4.24) m/z 51.0 44 1 51 0 4: 0 1 X 41 X c > 3 78 > 2, 1: 51\ I i 4.2 ` Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 RT I m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 47(4.24),Qvalue=1 m/z 67.0 6, i 44 5: ^>, 40, 4: o 4-_- T< X 41 X > 78\ > 3 2, 1: 51\ G i 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 4.2 m/7 Min 1 Ref Spec: 3 Chlorodifluoromethane (NIST) m/z 69.0 51 0 � c X_ X > • > 67\ 35\I , I 150 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 4.2 m/7 Min RT Mass Response Amount 4.24 51.00 52 0.000965 4.23 67.00 0 4.23 69.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:08:41 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 312 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:13:00 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-06.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 15:49:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-9 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-9 Client ID: 4843 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 6 Worklist Smp#: 6 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: Al_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 5 Chloromethane, CAS: 74-87-3 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 132(4.69) m/z 50.0 / co 1, 44 a) 2 v -c--:--) 1 oo21 X_ 11 X_ 111 >- >- 11 40N • 50NI I/52 78I i 4.5 4.8 Min 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 FT I m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 132(4.69),Qvalue=11 s m/z 52.0 1, 44 1 11 El ;--< 0 1 • X 11 X ' 40N 50N I52 78\I 4.5 4.8 Min 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 FT I m/7 11 Ref Spec: 5 Chloromethane (NIST) 50 o 0 0 X >- /52 35N49� l . . I1I i 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 4.69 50.00 351 0.012949 4.69 52.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:08:44 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 313 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:13:00 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-06.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 15:49:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-9 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-9 Client ID: 4843 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 6 Worklist Smp#: 6 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: AlT015ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 6 Butane, CAS: 106-97-8 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 186(4.98) m/z 43.0 / N 1 44 2• rn 2. 0 T.< 1 X 1. > >1 78" • 39\ 52� 77N /80 i II I 64\1 II66 76" I II 94\1 4.8 i Min 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 82 86 90 94 98 FT I m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 186(4.98),Qvalue=16 m/z 41.0 N 1 44 3. o _ XX 2.31 : 0 1 0 �,' >- >_ 1: 78" 1 • 39\ 52" 77N /80 i i I I I I I II 64\1 1166 76" I 11 94\I 4.8 Min i 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 82 86 90 94 98 KT I m/7 11 / Ref Spec: 6 Butane (DATA) m/z 58.0 43 y o E 0 o c X X • >- >- • 41" 39,I 1 . ..-..58\1. i 1 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 82 86 90 94 98 4.8 mil Min RT Mass Response Amount 4.98 43.00 195 0.006675 4.98 41.00 606 4.92 58.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:08:49 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 314 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:13:00 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-06.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 15:49:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-9 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-9 Client ID: 4843 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 6 Worklist Smp#: 6 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: AI_TO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 8 Butadiene, CAS: 106-99-0 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 199(5.05) m/z 54.0 18- i r 44 1. o 15- 1 6, 0 x 1'2- j Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:13:00 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 Manual Integration/User Assign Peak Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-06.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 15:49:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-9 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-9 Client ID: 4843 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 6 Worklist Smp#: 6 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: AlTO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 17 Ethanol, CAS: 64-17-5 Signal: 1 Processing Integration Results RT: 7.25 m/z 45.0 Area: 1185 4: Amount: 0.194806 4, ++ Amount Units: ppb v/v I 4, 3: 3 _o x 2: • } 2, 21 1: 1 .•.•.•..•.• ........ ..i .. ::.:.:.::::: :::::::::::: • :::::::::::: :::::::::::: 6.9 7.1 7.3 7.5 Min Manual Integration Results RT: 7.25 m/z 45.0 Area: 1037 48- Amount: 0.170476 44- Amount Units: ppb v/v 40- 36- 32- 0 28- x 24' 20- i:•:•:•: 16- 12- S 0 6.9 7.1 7.3 7.5 Min RT I I Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:09:10 Audit Action: Manually Integrated Audit Reason:Assign Peak Page 316 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:13:00 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-06.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 15:49:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-9 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-9 Client ID: 4843 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 6 Worklist Smp#: 6 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethodX.m Limit Group: Al_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 24 Isopropyl alcohol, CAS: 67-63-0 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 816(8.35) m/z 45.0 5: 45 6: 4: 5 i x 41 x 4, 3 >- 3 2, 44N 2 1: 207' 11 i 8.2 8.5 i Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 FT I m/7 Amdis Enhanced Spec:Scan 816(8.35),Qvalue=92 m/z 43.0 91 45 21 • 7: 1: 411 o 0CO X 6 x 1 >- 5 >- 3' 207N 2: 1 I 8.2 8.5 : Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 FT i m/7 11 i Ref Spec: 24 Isopropyl alcohol (NIST) 45 0 0 0 X >- 43 . .,I llli , I. i 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 8.35 45.00 780 0.025881 8.34 43.00 412 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:09:49 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 317 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:13:00 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-06.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 15:49:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-9 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-9 Client ID: 4843 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 6 Worklist Smp#: 6 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 27 Methylene Chloride, CAS: 75-09-2 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 918(8.90) m/z 49.0 2, 1: 0 44N 1 od 0 2i 49N 0 1 X 11 X c 1 ; i 8.8 Min 4 40 42 44 46 48 50 RT i* mh Enhanced Spec:Scan 918(8.90),Qvalue=1 m/z 84.0 2 44N 1 0 21 49\ 0 1 X 1C X c lliP >- } 1 i — 8.8 ` Min 40 42 44 46 48 50 AZT I mb 1 Ref Spec: 27 Methylene Chloride (NIST) m/z 86.0 49 . o E 0 _o S X 5--< } >- G i 40 42 44 46 48 50 8.8 m/7 Min RT Mass Response Amount 8.90 49.00 61 0.002537 8.90 84.00 0 8.90 86.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:09:52 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 318 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:13:00 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-06.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 15:49:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-9 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-9 Client ID: 4843 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 6 Worklist Smp#: 6 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 47 Benzene, CAS: 71-43-2 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 1668(12.91) m/z 78.0 21 21 1: 0 21 78N o^ 44N x 1 1: >- >- 1 • • 12.8 Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 FT 1 m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 1668(12.91),Qvalue=1 m/z 77.0 2' • 021 78". cia X 44N X -- 1: >- >- 1 • 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 12.8 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 47 Benzene (DATA) 78 ' _o X >- 77N 5152 I I I . 76.1 79I I 1 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 12.91 78.00 60 0.000523 12.90 77.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:10:11 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 319 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:13:00 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-06.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 15:49:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-9 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-9 Client ID: 4843 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 6 Worklist Smp#: 6 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: Al_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 61 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK), CAS: 108-10-1 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 2290(16.24) 21 m/z 43.0 21 1: 43 44\ 1: I' x 1 x 1 } 1 >- • •s i 16.1 16.4 Min 40 42 44 46 48 50 FT —I m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 2290(16.24),Qvalue=1 m/z 58.0 21 43 44� 1: E x 1 X 0 } 1 >_ , , , 1 40 42 44 46 48 50 16.1 16.4 m/7 Min 1 Ref Spec: 61 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) (NIST) 43 o 0 _o X >- i 40 42 44 46 48 50 m17 RT Mass Response Amount 16.24 43.00 121 0.002707 16.22 58.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:10:33 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 320 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:13:00 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-06.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 15:49:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-9 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-9 Client ID: 4843 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 6 Worklist Smp#: 6 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: Al_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 69 2-Hexanone, CAS: 591-78-6 Processing Results 2 Raw Spec:Scan 2590(17.84) m/z 43.0 21 40 43 2, 21 0 1: 44 0 1: x 1 x_ 17.8 Min 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 �tT m/7 2 Enhanced Spec:Scan 2590(17.84),Qvalue=1 21 m/z 58.0 21 40 43 1: 0 1: 44 0 x 1 x- El31 } 1 >_ 17.8 Min 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 FT m/7 1 Ref Spec: 69 2-Hexanone (NIST) 43 X } 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 mh RT Mass Response Amount 17.84 43.00 71 0.001783 17.84 58.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:10:39 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 321 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:13:00 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-06.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 15:49:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-9 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-9 Client ID: 4843 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 6 Worklist Smp#: 6 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 75 Chlorobenzene, CAS: 108-90-7 Processing Results 4 Raw Spec:Scan 2870(19.34) m/z 11112.0 • 117 4 ii 4 3 0 0 3 0 2; X X >- 2: >- 21 21 82N 1, 1, 116N 52� '54 81 1 112" 19.1 19.4 ` � II �I I III II i I Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 104 108 112 116 120 FT 1 m/7 4 Enhanced Spec:Scan 2870(19.34),Qvalue=1 m/ 77.0 • 117 4 4 3 0 0 xo 3 X 2: r 7 >- 2: >- 21 21 82\ 1, 1 1A 116 52`I I�54 81NI i II 1 I III I 112) ' I 19.1 19.4 i Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 104 108 112 116 120 FT I m/7 1 Ref Spec: 75 Chlorobenzene (NIST) m/z 114.0 112 2, a 21 0 0 0 11 XX ,- 1 } r 77." • '114 , 51; I. 3$ l i 1 I 19.1 Min 19.4 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 104 108 112 116 120 VT 1 m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 19.34 112.00 888 0.006963 19.34 77.00 0 19.34 114.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:10:50 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 322 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:13:00 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 t t User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-06.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 15:49:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-9 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-9 Client ID: 4843 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 6 Worklist Smp#: 6 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 76 Ethylbenzene, CAS: 100-41-4 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 2895(19.47) m/z 91.0 4 91� 4 31 3 X6 6 31 117N X 2: >- 2, >- 21 1: 744 82\ 106N 1, 1 i 19.4 Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 104 108 112 116 120 FT I m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 2895(19.47),Qvalue=1 m/z 106.0 4 91 21 _ 3: • X o 0 1: El 31 117 x 1 >- 2, > 1: 744 82\ 106' 1 i 19.4 i Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 104 108 112 116 120 FT { m/7 11 Ref Spec: 76 Ethylbenzene (NIST) 91 0 0 o_ X >- 106' 51N165N77) (78 Ii. I.I. .,..IIS .. , �792 5 a.l , i " 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 104 108 112 116 120 m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 19.47 91.00 545 0.002779 19.48 106.00 127 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:10:57 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 323 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:13:00 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-06.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 15:49:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-9 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-9 Client ID: 4843 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 6 Worklist Smp#: 6 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: AlTO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 85 N-Propylbenzene, CAS: 103-65-1 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 3336(21.83) m/z 91.0 51 91 5• c 4: 4 a 41 3: x x 3 — 2 } 40N } 2 1: 1: i 21.6 21.9 ` Min 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 82 86 90 94 98 F-T 1 m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3336(21.83),Qvalue=1 m/z 120.0 51 91 1 4: c� 0 41 0 1 X X c 3 } 40N } : 2, 1: i 21.6 21.9 ` Min 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 82 86 90 94 98 RT 1 m/7 11 Ref Spec: 85 N-Propylbenzene (NIST) m/z 92.0 91 — O • E 0 o c X X >- • >- 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 82 86 90 94 98 21.6 21.9 m/7 Min RT Mass Response Amount 21.83 91.00 1131 0.004503 21.82 120.00 98 21.83 92.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:11:30 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 324 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:13:00 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 '4, User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-06.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 15:49:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-9 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-9 Client ID: 4843 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 6 Worklist Smp#: 6 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 90 1 ,3,5-Trimethylbenzene, CAS: 108-67-8 Processing Results 51 Raw Spec:Scan 3371(22.02) m/z 105.0 105 5, 4• 4 0 4 0 31 } 3 40N 91N j 2 2 : 1: 21 1 63N 120" ` i 21.9 22.2 i Min 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 82 86 90 94 98102106110114118 i2T i m17 Amdis Enhanced Spec:Scan 3371(22.02),Qvalue=801 m/z 120.0 Ln 91 105 1 7: 41, o 0 1ail x 6 x } 5 >- 3• 2' 120' _ i 1 63) 77) 21.9 22.2 i Min 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 82 86 90 94 98102106110114118 FT I m/7 1 Ref Spec: 90 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene (NIST) 105 0 0 0 120N x_ • 119NI39Ni 77) r79 91N1 i 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 82 86 90 94 98102106110114118 mb RT Mass Response Amount 22.02 105.00 958 0.004911 22.02 120.00 157 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:11:50 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 325 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:13:00 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-06.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 15:49:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-9 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-9 Client ID: 4843 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 6 Worklist Smp#: 6 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 ( 0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 89 2-Chlorotoluene, CAS: 95-49-8 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 3373(22.03) m/z 91.0 i 5: 91 5 0 4: 4 c� 41 3: 3 2 >- 2 105N 1: 1: 21.8 22.1 Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 104 108 �z m/7 Amdis Enhanced Spec:Scan 3373(22.03),Qvalue=51 m/z 63.0 91 105 1 7: 0 X 6 X c >- 5 >- 3° 2: 1 21.8 22.1 Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 104 108 RT m/7 11 Ref Spec: 89 2-Chlorotoluene (NIST) 91 X >- 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 104 108 m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 22.03 91.00 1217 0.006339 22.03 63.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:11:47 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 326 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:13:00 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-06.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 15:49:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-9 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-9 Client ID: 4843 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 6 Worklist Smp#: 6 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: AI_TO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 93 1 ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene, CAS: 95-63-6 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 3496(22.69) m/z 105.0 3 105 3' r 31 31 X 2 40N X 2, >- 21 1: 207N } 1 1 11 i 22.6 Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 i2T i m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3496(22.69),Qvalue=1 m/z 120.0 3 105 1: 31 1 1 • II X 2 40� X 1 >- 21 207N } c 1 11 i 22.6 i Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 FT I m/7 11 Ref Spec: 93 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene (NIST) 105 0 0 0 X 120N /51 77� 91� J.._. ila. ...II._ ...II�. ...... . ..II I. �idi 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 22.69 105.00 320 0.001686 22.68 120.00 59 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:12:14 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 327 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:13:00 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-06.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 15:49:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-9 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-9 Client ID: 4843 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 6 Worklist Smp#: 6 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15MasterMethodX.m Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 94 sec-Butylbenzene, CAS: 135-98-8 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 3537(22.91) m/z 10 .0 2 21 21 S X44207 ' 0 1. x_ 1: 105' x 1 >- 1 } i • 22.8 ` Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 FT i m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3537(22.91),Qvalue=1 m/z 134.0 2• a 21c o r44 ._ 207' c x 1: 105N x >- 1 >- • G 1 I 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 22.8 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 94 sec-Butylbenzene (NIST) m/z 91.0 105 ES' E 0 o c XX >- • >- 77� 91N 134) ' i.. SII. 1036(106.. ....I,_ 1 I 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 22.8 m/7 Min RT Mass Response Amount 22.91 105.00 50 0.000186 22.90 134.00 0 22.90 91.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:12:18 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 328 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:13:00 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-06.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 15:49:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-9 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-9 Client ID: 4843 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 6 Worklist Smp#: 6 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: AI_TO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 95 4-Isopropyltoluene, CAS: 99-87-6 Processing Results 41 Raw Spec:Scan 3571(23.09) m/z 119.0 o 119 a) 3 35 0 ri N a 3140N 0 2: x 2 x 21 >- 21 / 207N >- 1, 44 1 11 i 22.9 23.2 ` Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 RI 1 m/7 41 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3571(23.09),Qvalue=1 m/z 134.0 119 3 -, c • ' °N X 2 X >- 21 207N >- -44 1 11 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 22.9 23.2 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 95 4-Isopropyltoluene (NIST) m/z 91.0 119 o y 0 o c X X >- T 134N 91N 41 I I ....,.,,--.,.i.77"1,. .I,.-..1. ..1.1117) I „ i I I I I 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 22.9 23.2 mh Min RT Mass Response Amount 23.09 119.00 412 0.001873 23.10 134.00 0 23.10 91.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:12:21 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 329 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:13:01 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-06.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 15:49:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-9 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-9 Client ID: 4843 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 6 Worklist Smp#: 6 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: Al_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 ( 0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 100 n-Butylbenzene, CAS: 104-51-8 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 3678(23.66) m/z 91.0 i 4 91 4co 1 207" 3 3: _o _S 2: x 31 X92 x >- 2, >-221 1: 1, 1 i i 23.6 i Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 vT I m/7 Amdis Enhanced Spec:Scan 3678(23.66),Qvalue=84 m/z 134.0 co 91 91/ 21 co 7: 1: N 0 0 T‹ 6 x 1if >- 5 } 3• /92 • 2: _ 1 134" i 23.6 i Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 RT I m/7 11 Refs pec: 100 n-Butylbenzene (NIST) rm/z 92.0 91 2 E 3 1 c) Ei'o C' 21 O O x '92 x_ 1 .-- i } >- 11 134" 65 105�I 23.6 i i 77 .L• �.. 39)L_ r Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 VT 1 m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 23.66 91.00 486 0.002711 23.67 134.00 59 23.66 92.00 237 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:12:42 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 330 of 407 3/7/2019 FORM I AIR - GC/MS VOA ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: TestAmerica Burlington Job No. : 200-47377-1 SDG No. : Client Sample ID: 6390 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-10 w Matrix: Air Lab File ID: 34588-07.D Analysis Method: TO-15 Date Collected: 02/12/2019 00:00 Sample wt/vol: 200 (mL) Date Analyzed: 02/14/2019 16:42 Soil Aliquot Vol: Dilution Factor: 1 Soil Extract Vol. : GC Column: RTX-624 ID: 0.32 (mm) % Moisture: Level: (low/med) Low Analysis Batch No. : 139996 Units: ppb v/v CAS NO. COMPOUND NAME RESULT Q RL RL 115-07-1 Propylene 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 75-71-8 Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-45-6 Freon 22 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 76-14-2 1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 74-87-3 Chloromethane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 106-97-8 n-Butane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-01-4 Vinyl chloride 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 • 106-99-0 1,3-Butadiene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20110 74-83-9 Bromomethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-00-3 Chloroethane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 593-60-2 Bromoethene(Vinyl Bromide) 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-69-4 Trichlorofluoromethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 64-17-5 Ethanol 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 76-13-1 Freon TF 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-35-4 1,1-Dichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 67-64-1 Acetone 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 67-63-0 Isopropyl alcohol 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 75-15-0 Carbon disulfide 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 107-05-1 3-Chloropropene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-09-2 Methylene Chloride 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-65-0 tert-Butyl alcohol 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 1634-04-4 Methyl tert-butyl ether 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 156-60-5 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 110-54-3 n-Hexane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-34-3 1,1-Dichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-05-4 Vinyl acetate 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 141-78-6 Ethyl acetate 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 78-93-3 Methyl Ethyl Ketone 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 156-59-2 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 540-59-0 1,2-Dichloroethene, Total 0.40 U 0.40 0.40 67-66-3 Chloroform 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 109-99-9 Tetrahydrofuran 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 71-55-6 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 110-82-7 Cyclohexane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 56-23-5 Carbon tetrachloride 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 540-84-1 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 FORM I TO-15 Page 331 of 407 3/7/2019 FORM I AIR - GC/MS VOA ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: TestAmerica Burlington Job No. : 200-47377-1 SDG No. : Client Sample ID: 6390 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-10 Matrix: Air Lab File ID: 34588-07.D Analysis Method: TO-15 Date Collected: 02/12/2019 00:00 Sample wt/vol: 200 (mL) Date Analyzed: 02/14/2019 16:42 Soil Aliquot Vol: Dilution Factor: 1 Soil Extract Vol. : GC Column: RTX-624 ID: 0.32 (mm) Moisture: Level: (low/med) Low Analysis Batch No. : 139996 Units: ppb v/v CAS NO. COMPOUND NAME RESULT Q RL RL 71-43-2 Benzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 107-06-2 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 142-82-5 n-Heptane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 79-01-6 Trichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 80-62-6 Methyl methacrylate 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 78-87-5 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 123-91-1 1,4-Dioxane 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 75-27-4 Bromodichloromethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 10061-01-5 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-10-1 methyl isobutyl ketone 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 108-88-3 Toluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 10061-02-6 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 79-00-5 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 127-18-4 Tetrachloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 591-78-6 Methyl Butyl Ketone (2-Hexanone) 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 124-48-1 Dibromochloromethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 106-93-4 1,2-Dibromoethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-90-7 Chlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 100-41-4 Ethylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 179601-23-1 m,p-Xylene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 95-47-6 Xylene, o- 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 1330-20-7 Xylene (total) 0.70 U 0.70 0.70 100-42-5 Styrene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-25-2 Bromoform 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 98-82-8 Cumene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 79-34-5 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 103-65-1 n-Propylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 622-96-8 4-Ethyltoluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-67-8 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 95-49-8 2-Chlorotoluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 98-06-6 tert-Butylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 95-63-6 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 135-98-8 sec-Butylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 99-87-6 4-Isopropyltoluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 541-73-1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 106-46-7 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 FORM I TO-15 Page 332 of 407 3/7/2019 FORM I , AIR - GC/MS VOA ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: TestAmerica Burlington Job No. : 200-47377-1 SDG No. : Client Sample ID: 6390 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-10 Matrix: Air Lab File ID: 34588-07.D Analysis Method: TO-15 Date Collected: 02/12/2019 00:00 Sample wt/vol: 200 (mL) Date Analyzed: 02/14/2019 16:42 Soil Aliquot Vol: Dilution Factor: 1 Soil Extract Vol. : GC Column: RTX-624 ID: 0.32 (mm) % Moisture: Level: (low/med) Low Analysis Batch No. : 139996 Units: ppb v/v CAS NO. COMPOUND NAME RESULT Q RL RL 100-44-7 Benzyl chloride 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 104-51-8 n-Butylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 95-50-1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 W#L3 120-82-1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.50 U * 0.50 0.50 F 87-68-3 Hexachlorobutadiene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 91-20-3 Naphthalene 0.50 U * 0.50 0.50 III Illa FORM I TO-15 Page 333 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:19:00 Chrom Revision:2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 TestAmerica Burlington Target Compound Quantitation Report Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-07.D Lims ID: 200-47377-A-10 Client ID: 6390 Sample Type: Client Inject. Date: 14-Feb-2019 16:42:30 ALS Bottle#: 7 Worklist Smp#: 7 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Sample Info: 200-0034588-007 Misc. Info.: 47377-10 Operator ID: ggg Instrument ID: CHX.i Method: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\TO15_MasterMethod_X.m.m Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Last Update: 15-Feb-2019 14:18:58 Calib Date: 24-Jan-2019 08:07:30 Integrator: RTE ID Type: Deconvolution ID Quant Method: Internal Standard Quant By: Initial Calibration Last ICal File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190123-34274.b\34274-17.D Column 1 : RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Det: MS SCAN Process Host: CTX0331 First Level Reviewer: bunmaa Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:18:58 RT Adj RT Dlt RT OnCol Amt Compound Sig (min.) (min.) (min.) Q Response ppb v/v Flags 1 Propene 41 4.078 ND 2 Dichlorodifluoromethane 85 4.169 ND 3 Chlorodifluoromethane 51 4.233 ND UilIF 4 1,2-Dichloro-1,1,2,2-tetra 85 4.506 ND 5 Chloromethane 50 4.693 ND U 6 Butane 43 4.923 ND U 7 Vinyl chloride 62 4.977 ND 8 Butadiene 54 5.068 ND 10 Bromomethane 94 5.859 ND 11 Chloroethane 64 6.116 ND 13 Vinyl bromide 106 6.539 ND 14 Trichlorofluoromethane 101 6.635 ND 17 Ethanol 45 7.245 7.250 0.022 51 831 0.1438 20 1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trif 101 7.721 ND 21 1,1-Dichloroethene 96 7.791 ND 22 Acetone 43 8.037 ND 23 Carbon disulfide 76 8.208 ND MU 24 Isopropyl alcohol 45 8.304 ND U 25 3-Chloro-1-propene 41 8.593 ND 27 Methylene Chloride 49 8.898 ND 28 2-Methyl-2-propanol 59 9.096 ND 29 Methyl tert-butyl ether 73 9.299 ND 31 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 61 9.347 ND S 30 1,2-Dichloroethene, Total 61 9.665 ND 33 Hexane 57 9.722 ND 34 1,1-Dichloroethane 63 10.251 ND 35 Vinyl acetate 43 10.305 ND 37 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 96 11.369 ND 38 2-Butanone(MEK) 72 11.412 ND 39 Ethyl acetate 88 11.434 ND " 40 Chlorobromomethane 128 11.829 11.830 -0.001 66 260085 10.0 Page 334 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:19:00 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-07.D RT Adj RT Dlt RT OnCol Amt Compound Sig (min.) (min.) (min.) Q Response ppb v/v Flags 41 Tetrahydrofuran 42 11.835 ND 42 Chloroform 83 11.947 ND 43 Cyclohexane 84 12.193 ND 441,1,1-Trichloroethane 97 12.225 ND 45 Carbon tetrachloride 117 12.461 ND 46 Isooctane 57 12.846 ND 47 Benzene 78 12.905 ND 48 1,2-Dichloroethane 62 13.081 ND 49 n-Heptane 43 13.199 ND * 50 1,4-Difluorobenzene 114 13.670 13.670 0.000 92 1302734 10.0 53 Trichloroethene 95 14.109 ND 54 1,2-Dichloropropane 63 14.622 ND 55 Methyl methacrylate 69 14.740 ND 56 1,4-Dioxane 88 14.815 ND 57 Dibromomethane 174 14.863 ND 58 Dichlorobromomethane 83 15.120 ND 60 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 75 15.970 ND 61 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK 43 16.222 ND 65 Toluene 92 16.516 ND 66 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 75 17.072 ND 67 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 83 17.431 ND 68 Tetrachloroethene 166 17.532 ND 69 2-Hexanone 43 17.837 ND ill 71 Chlorodibromomethane 129 18.164 ND Et3 72 Ethylene Dibromide 107 18.431 ND 74 Chlorobenzene-d5 117 19.282 19.282 0.000 84 1071499 10.0 75 Chlorobenzene 112 19.341 ND U 76 Ethylbenzene 91 19.474 ND U S 73 Xylenes, Total 106 19.600 ND 78 m-Xylene& p-Xylene 106 19.715 ND U 79 o-Xylene 106 20.517 ND 80 Styrene 104 20.571 ND U 81 Bromoform 173 20.978 ND 82 Isopropylbenzene 105 21.149 ND 84 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 83 21.775 ND U 85 N-Propylbenzene 91 21.833 ND U 88 4-Ethyltoluene 105 22.015 ND U 89 2-Chlorotoluene 91 22.031 ND U 90 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 105 22.112 ND U 92 tent-Butylbenzene 119 22.588 ND 93 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 105 22.679 ND U 94 sec-Butylbenzene 105 22.898 ND U 95 4-Isopropyltoluene 119 23.096 ND 96 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 146 23.139 23.139 0.000 87 1096 0.0101 97 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 146 23.278 23.273 0.005 90 1122 0.0109 98 Benzyl chloride 91 23.470 ND U 100 n-Butylbenzene 91 23.668 ND MU 101 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 146 23.813 23.813 0.000 90 1041 0.009620 103 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 180 26.370 26.359 0.011 85 1447 0.0289 104 Hexachlorobutadiene 225 26.541 ND 105 Naphthalene 128 26.873 26.873 0.011 94 2218 0.0147 7M Page 335 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:19:00 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 QC Flag Legend Processing Flags 7- Failed Limit of Detection Review Flags M - Manually Integrated U - Marked Undetected Reagents: ATTO15XISs_00002 Amount Added: 20.00 Units: mL Run Reagent Page 336 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date:15-Feb-2019 14:19:00 Chrom Revision:2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-07.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 16:42:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Operator ID: ggg Lims ID: 200-47377-A-10 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-10 Worklist Smp#: 7 Client ID: 6390 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil.Factor: 1.0000 ALS Bottle#: 7 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column:RTX-624(0.32 mm) Y Scaling:Method Defined:Scale to the Nth Largest Target:1 1 34588-07[MS SCAN Chro]:Total n m N oi 14- o r ___....i: Ln M y 13- m G 0 N N N L p 12^ a `o 2 8 U 11' p v • 10- F 3 N O pp O O N x g c >- N E 7. E 2 n 2El g L U 5- 4- 3- 2.2. t 3.0 5.0 7.0 9.0 11.0 13.0 15.0 17.0 19.0 21.0 23.0 25.0 27.0 29.0 31.0 Min Page 337 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:19:00 Chrom Revision:2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-07.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 16:42:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-10 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-10 Client ID: 6390 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 7 Worklist Smp#: 7 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 3 Chlorodifluoromethane, CAS: 75-45-6 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 19(4.09) m/z 51.0 11 •a E o S X X >- 78 77 207 r51 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 4.1 m/7 Min Enhanced Spec:Scan 19(4.09),Qvalue=1 m/z 67.0 11 •E co • X X 78" 77� 207 I__51 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 4.1 m/7 Min Ref Spec: 3 Chlorodifluoromethane (NIST) m/z 69.0 11 51 T O ; •E O 5 X X > >- 671 35 i..I. 50 •• 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 4.1 m/7 Min RT Mass Response Amount 4.09 51.00 54 0.001055 4.23 67.00 0 4.23 69.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:15:50 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 338 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:19:00 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-07.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 16:42:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-10 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-10 Client ID: 6390 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 7 Worklist Smp#: 7 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: Al TO15 ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 5 Chloromethane, CAS: 74-87-3 Processing Results 4: / Raw Spec:Scan 130(4.68) 21 m/z 50.0 4 40 44 1: � a 3: o X 3' 1 } 2, >- 78N >- 1: • 1 p 4.6 ` Min 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 FT mh 4: Enhanced Spec:Scan 130(4.68),Qvalue=1 m/z 52.0 4 40 44 3 x 31 x 2, 78N 1: 50\ 1 i 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 4.6 mh Min 1 Ref Spec: 5 Chloromethane (NIST) 50 X >- 52 49 35N1I 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 4.68 50.00 110 0.004270 4.69 52.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:15:55 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 339 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:19:00 Chrom Revision:2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-07.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 16:42:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-10 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-10 Client ID: 6390 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 7 Worklist Smp#: 7 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: AITO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 6 Butane, CAS: 106-97-8 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 175(4.92) m/z 43.0 / m 44 2 N 1 °' v a 21 1 a x_ x_ 1 11 >- C >- 11 78" 40"' VIII 51 III I"52 I 11 I/82 91\I 4.7 5.0 i Min 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 82 86 90 94 98 V2T 1 m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 175(4.92),Qvalue=13 3i m/z 41.0 44 1 31 I 0 1 0 2• x x 1: >- C > 1 78'" 40N III 5 II I"52 III 82 91\I 4.7 5.0 G Min 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 82 86 90 94 98 PT 1 m/7 _- _,,.,_, 11 Ref Spec: 6 Butane (DATA) m/z 58.0 43 T O C o O C X X >- >- • 41N 39 � I, I 58�I 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 82 86 90 94 98 4.7 5.0 m/7 Min RT Mass Response Amount 4.92 43.00 377 0.013581 4.93 41.00 352 4.92 58.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:15:57 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 340 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:19:00 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-07.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 16:42:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-10 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-10 Client ID: 6390 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 7 Worklist Smp#: 7 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: AlTO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 24 Isopropyl alcohol, CAS: 67-63-0 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 811(8.33) 61 m/z 45.1 5: 45 4: 51 '>-• o 0 41 I X 41 _X - 31 >- 3 40 >- 21 2' 44' I 11 1: G 8.0 8.3 8.6 i Min 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 IRT 1 1 m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 811(8.33),Qvalue=16 m/z 43.0 5: 45 61 4: 51 Ela 041 X 41 X >- 3 40" > 31 2' 44� 21 P j 1: 11 : 8.0 8.3 8.6 i Min 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 RT 1 1 m/7 11 Ref Spec: 24 Isopropyl alcohol (NIST) V 45 0 0 0 X >- 43.. 39\1 41 1 1 ` 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 8.33 45.00 1669 0.058277 8.30 43.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:16:42 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 341 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:19:00 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-07.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 16:42:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-10 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-10 Client ID: 6390 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 7 Worklist Smp#: 7 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: 1015 MasterMethodX.m Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 23 Carbon disulfide, CAS: 75-15-0 Processing Results 2: Raw Spec:Scan 787(8.20) m/z x76.0 76 3 2. 2 00 21 44N 0 21 x x 1 11 i 8.1 ` Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 VZT m/7 2: Enhanced Spec:Scan 787(8.20),Qvalue=51 76 2. 0 21 44N >- 1: 1 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 m/7 11 Ref Spec: 23 Carbon disulfide (NIST) 76 X >- 44) I i 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 8.20 76.00 167 0.001853 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:16:36 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 342 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:19:00 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-07.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 16:42:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-10 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-10 Client ID: 6390 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 7 Worklist Smp#: 7 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: Al_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 75 Chlorobenzene, CAS: 108-90-7 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 2870(19.34) m/z 112.0 i 4 117 21 0 3: o0 1: _ x 31 x 1 >- 2, >- 82N 1: 1 116N i • 40\I 54Ii1 lil it i 11�N1 I 19.2 19.5 ` 81\ Min 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 82 86 90 94 98102106110114118 FT I m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 2870(19.34),Qvalue=1 m/z 77.0 4 117 3 0 3: 0 2: 411) x 31 >7 21 >- 2• >- 82N 82N 1, 1: 1 116N 81� G • 51 4Ii1 lil iI i 11NI I 19.2 Min 19.5 G 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 82 86 90 94 98102106110114118 FT 1 m/7 11 Ref Spec: 75 Chlorobenzene (NIST) 1 m/z 114.0 112 1 o 0 0 1 X } 77N } 38"1. 51 II. i. I 19.2 19.5 —Hi Min G 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 82 86 90 94 98102106110114118 FT i m/? RT Mass Response Amount 19.34 112.00 353 0.002980 19.34 77.00 0 19.34 114.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:17:24 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 343 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:19:00 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-07.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 16:42:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-10 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-10 Client ID: 6390 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 7 Worklist Smp#: 7 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15MasterMethodX.m Limit Group: AlTO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 76 Ethylbenzene, CAS: 100-41-4 Processing Results 21 Raw Spec:Scan 2895(19.47 m///z 91.0 91117 2, q 1: 44 21 11 a 1: x X_ >- 1 >- 1 19.4 ` Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 104 108 112 116 120 FT I m/7 21 Enhanced Spec:Scan 2895(19.47),Qvalue=1 m/z 106.0 1: 91 117 > X44 E X 1 X4111 >- 1 >- 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 104 108 112 116 120 19.4 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 76 Ethylbenzene (NIST) 91 0 0 _o X >- 106" 51� 65� � i II�. .,I.I. 77„I�178 192 5,,,:i 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100104 108 112 116120 mh RT Mass Response Amount 19.47 91.00 183 0.001005 19.47 106.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:17:27 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 344 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:19:00 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-07.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 16:42:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-10 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-10 Client ID: 6390 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 7 Worklist Smp#: 7 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 F. Method: TO15_MasterMethodX.m Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 ( 0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 78 m-Xylene & p-Xylene, CAS: 179601-23-1 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 2942(19.73) m/z 106.0 3 40 21 i 31 91" 1. E 2 0 x 106N x 1 21 } 1 • • 11 i 19.6 Min 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 82 86 90 94 98 102 106 110 FT I m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 2942(19.73),Qvalue=0 m/z 91.0 3 40 2 31 1 91N 21 0 2 0El } 21 106 } 1 1 11 11 G 19.6 G Min 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 82 86 90 94 98 102 106 110 FT i mh RT Mass Response Amount 19.73 106.00 246 0.003391 19.73 91.00 430 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:17:32 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 345 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:19:00 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-07.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 16:42:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-10 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-10 Client ID: 6390 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 7 Worklist Smp#: 7 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethodX.m Limit Group: Al_1015ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 80 Styrene, CAS: 100-42-5 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 3101(20.58) m/z 104.0 2, 21 21 104N 0 1. x 1; X •• • 20.5 ` Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 104 108 �T m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3101(20.58),Qvalue=1 m/z 78.0 2, a 21 104" 11 >- >- 1 Q I I 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 104 108 20.5 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 80 Styrene (NIST) 104 ' X r 78' 103N 51N 77N 50.1 52 39.111 63� I 102NI (105 �II. ._ I- 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 104 108 m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 20.58 104.00 165 0.001613 20.57 78.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:17:37 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 346 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:19:00 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-07.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 16:42:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Urns ID: 200-47377-A-10 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-10 Client ID: 6390 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 7 Worklist Smp#: 7 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 84 1 ,1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane, CAS: 79-34-5 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 3327(21.79) m/z 83.0 3/ 21 0 283N 95N 0 1: X 21 X 1 >- >- 1 11 • 1 21.6 21.9 Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 SRT I m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3327(21.79),Qvalue=1 m/z 131.0 31 a • _0 2 83N 95N c X 21 X El >- >- 1 11 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 21.6 21.9 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 84 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane (NIST) m/z 85.0 83 1 o 1 0 0 0 11 XX85 7 c >- • 6° I I6.1 951 1 21.6 21.9 i Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 FT i m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 21.79 83.00 240 0.002549 21.77 131.00 0 21.77 85.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:17:42 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 347 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:19:01 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-07.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 16:42:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-10 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-10 Client ID: 6390 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 7 Worklist Smp#: 7 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: Al_TO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 85 N-Propylbenzene, CAS: 103-65-1 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 3336(21.83) m/z 91.0 2: 3: 91 31 0 2� X44 0 2 x 21 x >- 1: >- il 1: 1 1 21.8 i Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 PT i m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3336(21.83),Qvalue=1 m/z 120.0 2: 91' 2. ,44 i MEM o c X 21 >< >- 1: >- 1 i i 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 21.8 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 85 N-Propylbenzene (NIST) m/z 92.0 91 : O — O C X X r >- i 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 21.8 m17 Min RT Mass Response Amount 21.83 91.00 195 0.000836 21.83 120.00 0 21.83 92.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:17:45 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 348 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:19:01 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-07.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 16:42:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-10 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-10 Client ID: 6390 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 7 Worklist Smp#: 7 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15MasterMethodX.m Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 88 4-Ethyltoluene, CAS: 622-96-8 Processing Results 4 Raw Spec:Scan 3370(22.02) 4 m/z 105.0 105 3: 3 0 31 0 2: X X >- 2, 21 1; 91 1, 1 i 21.9 Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 104 108 FT m/7 4 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3370(22.02),Qvalue=1 m/z 120.0 105 3: • c • 0 31100 X X > 2, >- 1: 91 1 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 104 108 21.9 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 88 4-Ethyltoluene (NIST) 105 0 0 X } 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 104 108 m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 22.02 105.00 332 0.001669 22.02 120.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:17:49 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 349 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:19:01 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-07.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 16:42:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-10 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-10 Client ID: 6390 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 7 Worklist Smp#: 7 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 90 1 ,3,5-Trimethylbenzene, CAS: 108-67-8 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 3373(22.03) 1 m/z 105.0 2• 91 40 105 1 21 0 1 1: X44 X >- >- 1 o I N ` N • 22.0 Min 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 82 86 90 94 98 102 106 110 FT m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3373(22.03),Qvalue=1i m/z 120.0 2• 91 40 105' o 21 1: X44 x >- >- 1 • 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 82 86 90 94 98 102 106 110 22.0 m/7 Min 1 Ref Spec: 90 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene (NIST) 105 0 X > 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 82 86 90 94 98 102 106 110 m17 RT Mass Response Amount 22.03 105.00 68 0.000375 22.11 120.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:17:55 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 350 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:19:01 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-07.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 16:42:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-10 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-10 Client ID: 6390 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 7 Worklist Smp#: 7 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 89 2-Chlorotoluene, CAS: 95-49-8 Processing Results 3 Raw Spec:Scan 3372(22.03) m/z 91.0 91 31 31 oN 11 N 0 2 O 2, X X 1i 21 >- } 1 1 11 21.9 22.2 Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 RT m/7 3 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3372(22.03),Qvalue=1 m/z 63.0 91 31 •E • 2 X X } 21 >- 1 1 11 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 21.9 22.2 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 89 2-Chlorotoluene (NIST) 91 ;"-< >- 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 mh RT Mass Response Amount 22.03 91.00 423 0.002372 22.03 63.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:17:52 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 351 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:19:01 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-07.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 16:42:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-10 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-10 Client ID: 6390 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 7 Worklist Smp#: 7 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 93 1 ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene, CAS: 95-63-6 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 3493(22.67) m/z 105.0 co 31 21 � N 1i N, O 2 O 21 ',R 1 y 44 105N 207N } 1 11 i 22.6 i Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 VZT 1 m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3493(22.67),Qvalue=1 m/z 120.0 31 2 c o C x 21 ›- 44 105N 207 >- 1 11 i i 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 22.6 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 931,2,4-Trimethylbenzene (NIST) 105 Co Co _o X >- 120N ,i 39)1104 177N 91N1.. ,,.IIL .. I106 119il I. - Li-I I_ 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 mh RT Mass Response Amount 22.67 105.00 54 0.000306 22.68 120.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:18:00 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 352 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:19:01 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-07.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 16:42:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-10 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-10 Client ID: 6390 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 7 Worklist Smp#: 7 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 94 sec-Butylbenzene, CAS: 135-98-8 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 3495(22.68) m/z 105.0 2: 23", E) 21 105 207N - >- 1: '_44 >- 1 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 22.8 m/7 Min Enhanced Spec:Scan 3495(22.68),Qvalue=1 m/z 134.0 2: 2A • • o X 21 105 207 j 1: - 44 1 • 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 22.8 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 94 sec-Butylbenzene (NIST) m/z 91.0 105 a o c — c X X 134 77 91\1103 � ' .L•- ...- ...�I. -- I.�.X106.... 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 22.8 m/7 Min RT Mass Response Amount 22.68 105.00 65 0.000260 22.90 134.00 0 22.90 91.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:18:02 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 353 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:19:01 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-07.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 16:42:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-10 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-10 Client ID: 6390 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 7 Worklist Smp#: 7 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 98 Benzyl chloride, CAS: 100-44-7 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 3643(23.48) m/z 91.0 4 207 3: 91N 31 i 3: o 0 2, X- 31 __44 X 1: } 2• } 1 1: 1 i i i 23.3 23.6 i Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 FT i m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3643(23.48),Qvalue=l m/z 126.0 4 207 Y ip 3: 91 r E c X 31 /44 > 2• >- 1:1: 1 i 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 23.3 23.6 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 98 Benzyl chloride (NIST) m/z 65.0 91 o - o C XX } >- 126N ..89 [1. 65N.iii 39\I,(92 [(128 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 23.3 23.6 m/7 Min RT Mass Response Amount 23.48 91.00 577 0.005016 23.47 126.00 0 23.47 65.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:18:15 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 354 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:19:01 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-07.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 16:42:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-10 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-10 Client ID: 6390 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 7 Worklist Smp#: 7 ,; Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 ( 0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 100 n-Butylbenzene, CAS: 104-51-8 Processing Results 3 Raw Spec:Scan 3679(23.67) co 91.0 2: 91 207 31co.i co2 0 2' X44 0 21 x 21 x II 11 1 ' 23.6 ` Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 FT 1 m/7 3 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3679(23.67),Qvalue=1 m/z 134.0 2: 91 2071 a 2, ,44 1 ' ; Oa• X 21 1 23.6 si Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 FT 1 m/7 11 Ref Spec: 100 n-Butylbenzene (NIST) m/z 92.0 91 1 0 1 0 0 0 X_ /92 x } 134 I i .i77\L..65..1.I. 39)11 1105 I. .-• , 23.6 ` Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 FT 1 m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 23.67 91.00 309 0.001855 23.67 134.00 0 23.67 92.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:18:25 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 355 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:19:01 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 Manual Integration/User Assign Peak Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-07.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 16:42:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-10 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-10 Client ID: 6390 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 7 Worklist Smp#: 7 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: Al_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 105 Naphthalene, CAS: 91-20-3 Signal: 1 Processing Integration Results RT: 26.87 m/z 128.0 Area: 1352 7: M Amount: 0.008983 7 I Amount Units: ppb v/v 60 61 5, 0 4: x 4 3: 31 2, 1: 0. 1 26.5 26.7 26.9 27.1 Min Manual Integration Results RT: 26.87 m/z 128.0 Area: 2218 78- Amount: 0.014736 72- Amount Units: ppb v/v 68- 60- ilic4D.:•....... 54- 0 48- X 42- } 36- 30- 24' 18- �:::::::: is 12- 0 i 1 1 :.'.i .i 1 i 1 26.5 26.7 26.9 27.1 Min RT I i Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:18:42 Audit Action: Manually Integrated Audit Reason: Assign Peak Page 356 of 407 3/7/2019 FORM I AIR - GC/MS VOA ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: TestAmerica Burlington Job No. : 200-47377-1 SDG No. : Client Sample ID: 4651 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-11 of Matrix: Air Lab File ID: 34588-08.D Analysis Method: TO-15 Date Collected: 02/12/2019 00:00 Sample wt/vol: 200 (mL) Date Analyzed: 02/14/2019 17:35 Soil Aliquot Vol: Dilution Factor: 1 Soil Extract Vol. : GC Column: RTX-624 ID: 0.32 (mm) % Moisture: Level: (low/med) Low Analysis Batch No. : 139996 Units: ppb v/v CAS NO. COMPOUND NAME RESULT Q RL RL 115-07-1 Propylene 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 75-71-8 Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-45-6 Freon 22 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 76-14-2 1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 74-87-3 Chloromethane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 106-97-8 n-Butane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-01-4 Vinyl chloride 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 • 106-99-0 1,3-Butadiene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20111 74-83-9 Bromomethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-00-3 Chloroethane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 593-60-2 Bromoethene(Vinyl Bromide) 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-69-4 Trichlorofluoromethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 64-17-5 Ethanol 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 76-13-1 Freon TF 0.20 0 0.20 0.20 75-35-4 1,1-Dichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 67-64-1 Acetone 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 67-63-0 Isopropyl alcohol 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 75-15-0 Carbon disulfide 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 107-05-1 3-Chloropropene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-09-2 Methylene Chloride 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-65-0 tert-Butyl alcohol 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 1634-04-4 Methyl tert-butyl ether 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 156-60-5 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 110-54-3 n-Hexane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-34-3 1,1-Dichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-05-4 Vinyl acetate 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 141-78-6 Ethyl acetate 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 78-93-3 Methyl Ethyl Ketone 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 156-59-2 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 540-59-0 1,2-Dichloroethene, Total 0.40 U 0.40 0.40 67-66-3 Chloroform 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 109-99-9 Tetrahydrofuran 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 71-55-6 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 110-82-7 Cyclohexane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 56-23-5 Carbon tetrachloride 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 540-84-1 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 FORM I TO-15 Page 357 of 407 3/7/2019 FORM I AIR - GC/MS VOA ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: TestAmerica Burlington Job No. : 200-47377-1 SDG No. : Client Sample ID: 4651 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-11 h Matrix: Air Lab File ID: 34588-08.D Analysis Method: TO-15 Date Collected: 02/12/2019 00:00 Sample wt/vol: 200 (mL) Date Analyzed: 02/14/2019 17:35 Soil Aliquot Vol: Dilution Factor: 1 Soil Extract Vol. : GC Column: RTX-624 ID: 0.32 (mm) % Moisture: Level: (low/med) Low Analysis Batch No. : 139996 Units: ppb v/v CAS NO. COMPOUND NAME RESULT Q RL RL 71-43-2 Benzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 107-06-2 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 142-82-5 n-Heptane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 79-01-6 Trichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 80-62-6 Methyl methacrylate 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 78-87-5 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 123-91-1 1,4-Dioxane 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 75-27-4 Bromodichloromethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 10061-01-5 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 4110 108-10-1 methyl isobutyl ketone 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 108-88-3 Toluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 10061-02-6 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 79-00-5 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 127-18-4 Tetrachloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 591-78-6 Methyl Butyl Ketone (2-Hexanone) 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 124-48-1 Dibromochloromethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 106-93-4 1,2-Dibromoethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-90-7 Chlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 100-41-4 Ethylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 179601-23-1 m,p-Xylene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 95-47-6 Xylene, o- 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 1330-20-7 Xylene (total) 0.70 U 0.70 0.70 100-42-5 Styrene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-25-2 Bromoform 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 98-82-8 Cumene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 79-34-5 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 103-65-1 n-Propylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 622-96-8 4-Ethyltoluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-67-8 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 95-49-8 2-Chlorotoluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 98-06-6 tert-Butylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 95-63-6 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 135-98-8 sec-Butylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 99-87-6 4-Isopropyltoluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 541-73-1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 106-46-7 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 FORM I TO-15 Page 358 of 407 3/7/2019 FORM I AIR - GC/MS VOA ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: TestAmerica Burlington Job No. : 200-47377-1 SDG No. : Client Sample ID: 4651 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-11 } z" Matrix: Air Lab File ID: 34588-08.D Analysis Method: TO-15 Date Collected: 02/12/2019 00:00 Sample wt/vol: 200 (mL) Date Analyzed: 02/14/2019 17:35 Soil Aliquot Vol: Dilution Factor: 1 Soil Extract Vol. : GC Column: RTX-624 ID: 0.32 (mm) Moisture: Level: (low/med) Low Analysis Batch No. : 139996 Units: ppb v/v CAS NO. COMPOUND NAME RESULT Q RL RL 100-44-7 Benzyl chloride 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 104-51-8 n-Butylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 95-50-1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 120-82-1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.50 U * 0.50 0.50 .hssL 87-68-3 Hexachlorobutadiene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 91-20-3 Naphthalene 0.50 U * 0.50 0.50 III 11:1 FORM I TO-15 Page 359 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:23:36 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 TestAmerica Burlington Target Compound Quantitation Report Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-08.D Lims ID: 200-47377-A-11 Client ID: 4651 Sample Type: Client Inject. Date: 14-Feb-2019 17:35:30 ALS Bottle#: 8 Worklist Smp#: 8 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Sample Info: 200-0034588-008 Misc. Info.: 47377-11 Operator ID: ggg Instrument ID: CHX.i Method: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\TO15_MasterMethodX.m.m Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Last Update: 15-Feb-2019 14:23:35 Calib Date: 24-Jan-2019 08:07:30 Integrator: RTE ID Type: Deconvolution ID Quant Method: Internal Standard Quant By: Initial Calibration Last ICaI File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190123-34274.b\34274-17.D Column 1 : RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Det: MS SCAN Process Host: CTX0331 First Level Reviewer: bunmaa Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:23:35 RT Adj RT Dlt RT OnCol Amt Compound Sig (min.) (min.) (min.) Q Response ppb v/v Flags 1 Propene 41 4.078 ND 2 Dichlorodifluoromethane 85 4.169 ND 3 Chlorodifluoromethane 51 4.233 ND U 40 4 1,2-Dichloro-1,1,2,2-tetra 85 4.506 ND 5 Chloromethane 50 4.693 ND U 6 Butane 43 4.923 ND U 7 Vinyl chloride 62 4.977 ND 8 Butadiene 54 5.068 ND 10 Bromomethane 94 5.859 ND U 11 Chloroethane 64 6.116 ND 13 Vinyl bromide 106 6.539 ND 14 Trichlorofluoromethane 101 6.635 ND 17 Ethanol 45 7.223 ND MU 20 1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trif 101 7.721 ND 21 1,1-Dichloroethene 96 7.791 ND 22 Acetone 43 8.037 ND 23 Carbon disulfide 76 8.208 ND MU 24 Isopropyl alcohol 45 8.304 ND U 25 3-Chloro-1-propene 41 8.593 ND 27 Methylene Chloride 49 8.898 ND 28 2-Methyl-2-propanol 59 9.096 ND 29 Methyl tert-butyl ether 73 9.299 ND 31 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 61 9.347 ND S 30 1,2-Dichloroethene, Total 61 9.665 ND 33 Hexane 57 9.722 ND 34 1,1-Dichloroethane 63 10.251 ND 35 Vinyl acetate 43 10.305 ND 37 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 96 11.369 ND 38 2-Butanone (MEK) 72 11.412 ND 39 Ethyl acetate 88 11.434 ND 40 Chlorobromomethane 128 11.829 11.830 -0.001 64 250207 10.0 Page 360 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:23:36 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-08.D RT Adj RT Dlt RT OnCol Amt Compound Sig (min.) (min.) (min.) Q Response ppb v/v Flags 41 Tetrahydrofuran 42 11.835 ND 42 Chloroform 83 11.947 ND 43 Cyclohexane 84 12.193 ND 441,1,1-Trichloroethane 97 12.225 ND 45 Carbon tetrachloride 117 12.461 ND 46 Isooctane 57 12.846 ND 47 Benzene 78 12.905 ND U 48 1,2-Dichloroethane 62 13.081 ND 49 n-Heptane 43 13.199 ND * 501,4-Difluorobenzene 114 13.670 13.670 0.000 92 1242191 10.0 53 Trichloroethene 95 14.109 ND 54 1,2-Dichloropropane 63 14.622 ND 55 Methyl methacrylate 69 14.740 ND 561,4-Dioxane 88 14.815 ND U 57 Dibromomethane 174 14.863 ND 58 Dichlorobromomethane 83 15.120 ND 60 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 75 15.970 ND 61 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK 43 16.222 ND 65 Toluene 92 16.516 ND 66 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 75 17.072 ND U 67 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 83 17.431 ND 68 Tetrachloroethene 166 17.532 ND 69 2-Hexanone 43 17.837 ND 71 Chlorodibromomethane 129 18.164 ND El • 72 Ethylene Dibromide 107 18.431 ND * 74 Chlorobenzene-d5 117 19.287 19.282 0.005 83 1048230 10.0 75 Chlorobenzene 112 19.341 ND U 76 Ethylbenzene 91 19.474 ND U S 73 Xylenes, Total 106 19.600 ND 78 m-Xylene& p-Xylene 106 19.715 ND 79 o-Xylene 106 20.517 ND 80 Styrene 104 20.571 ND 81 Bromoform 173 20.978 ND 82lsopropylbenzene 105 21.149 ND 84 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 83 21.775 ND U 85 N-Propylbenzene 91 21.833 ND U 88 4-Ethyltoluene 105 22.015 ND U 89 2-Chlorotoluene 91 22.031 ND U 90 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 105 22.112 ND U 92 tert-Butylbenzene 119 22.588 ND 93 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 105 22.679 ND U 94 sec-Butylbenzene 105 22.898 ND U 95 4-Isopropyltoluene 119 23.096 ND 96 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 146 23.139 ND 97 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 146 23.273 ND 98 Benzyl chloride 91 23.470 ND U 100 n-Butylbenzene 91 23.668 ND U 101 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 146 23.813 ND U 103 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 180 26.359 ND 104 Hexachlorobutadiene 225 26.541 ND 105 Naphthalene 128 26.862 ND MU Page 361 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:23:36 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 QC Flag Legend Review Flags M - Manually Integrated U - Marked Undetected Reagents: ATTO15XISs_00002 Amount Added: 20.00 Units: mL Run Reagent Page 362 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date:15-Feb-2019 14:23:37 Chrom Revision:2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-08.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 17:35:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Operator ID: ggg Lims ID: 200-47377-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-11 Worklist Smp#: 8 Client ID: 4651 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil.Factor: 1.0000 ALS Bottle#: 8 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: A[_TO15_ICAL Column:RTX-624(0.32 mm) Y Scaling:Method Defined:Scale to the Nth Largest Target: 1 1 34588-08[MS SCAN Chroj:Total n co 15 N O 7 14- fh d 13- iu $ N 0 d L 1r o 0 11- o 10- s O N O Oo o X 8 N E 0 } O 0 g L U � � I 4' 3 I 2 t R t 3.0 5.0 7.0 9.0 11.0 13.0 15.0 17.0 19.0 21.0 23.0 25.0 27.0 29.0 31.0 Min Page 363 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:23:37 Chrom Revision:2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-08.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 17:35:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-11 Client ID: 4651 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 8 Worklist Smp#: 8 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethodX.m Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 ( 0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 3 Chlorodifluoromethane, CAS: 75-45-6 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 8(4.03) m/z 51.0 6 78 5: a c 0 4: x 41 40744 x >- 3 77N. >- 207N 2• 1: '52 i 1 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 4.2 m17 Min Enhanced Spec:Scan 8(4.03),Qvalue=1 m/z 67.0 6• 78 5: i 0 4: c 4 40, 744 } 3 77N >- 207N 2• 1: 752 II i i 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 4.2 m/7 Min Ref Spec: 3 Chlorodifluoromethane (NIST) m/z 69.0 11 7 51 o .0 0 _o c X X >- >- • 67N i t 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 4.2 m/7 Min RT Mass Response Amount 4.03 51.00 51 0.001036 4.02 67.00 124 4.23 69.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:19:31 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 364 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:23:37 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-08.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 17:35:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-11 Client ID: 4651 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 8 Worklist Smp#: 8 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: Al_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 5 Chloromethane, CAS: 74-87-3 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 168(4.89) m/z 50.0 11 44 >. O •E X 78" X >- 41N 41" II 51 1 1 64\1 1111 O 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 82 86 90 4.6 m/7 Min Enhanced Spec:Scan 168(4.89),Qvalue=1 m/z 52.0 1i 44 •E • OEl/ 78N } >- 41N 41" I1 51 1 1 64\1 1111 180 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 82 86 90 4.6 m/7 Min 1 Ref Spec: 5 Chloromethane (NIST) 50 > 0 X 52 49N 35"i . . lil i i 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 82 86 90 m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 4.89 50.00 174 0.007022 4.90 52.00 137 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:19:35 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 365 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:23:37 Chrom Revision:2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-08.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 17:35:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-11 Client ID: 4651 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 8 Worklist Smp#: 8 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: Al_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 ( 0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 6 Butane, CAS: 106-97-8 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 173(4.91) m/z 43.0 N 11 44 21 o 78\ 0 11 X X 1 >.- i >- 41N X82 h I 51N 1/52 77\ III 911 4.8 Min 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 82 86 90 94 98 FT I m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 173(4.91),Qvalue=20 3o m/z 41.0 11 44 31 a _o 78 c2, 111111 X X 1. >- c >- 1 41N r82 h I 51111'52 77 I III 91 ` 4.8 ` Min-___- 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 82 86 90 94 98 FT i m17 Ref Spec: 6 Butane (DATA) m/z 58.0 11 43 o Y 0 o c X X } >- 41N 39'I' Ii- 58�I. I i I 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 82 86 90 94 98 4.8 m/7 Min RT Mass Response Amount 4.91 43.00 126 0.004718 4.91 41.00 257 4.92 58.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:19:38 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 366 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:23:37 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-08.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 17:35:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-11 Client ID: 4651 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 8 Worklist Smp#: 8 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: AlTO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 10 Bromomethane, CAS: 74-83-9 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 315(5.67) m/z 94.0 3 44 31 • E 0 2 X X >- 21 >- 1 1 11 40N 78N 1 1 1 1 I 1 5° 1 I 511 64 'i I I I I PO I 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 82 86 90 94 98 5.7 6.0 m/7 Min Enhanced Spec:Scan 315(5.67),Qvalue=l m/z 96.0 3 44 31 o E _o c X 2 X >- 21 >- 1 1 11 40N 78N 1 1 1 1 I ii 5° 1 l 511 64N11 I I 1 1 1 r0 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 82 86 90 94 98 5.7 6.0 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 10 Bromomethane (NIST) 94 N 96 0 X >- 93N1 91N1i1 I . 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 82 86 90 94 98 m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 5.67 94.00 49 0.001437 5.86 96.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:19:42 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 367 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:23:37 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-08.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 17:35:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-11 Client ID: 4651 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 8 Worklist Smp#: 8 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: AI_TO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 ( 0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 17 Ethanol, CAS: 64-17-5 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 606(7.23) m/z 45.0 44 45 • 3: 3 0 31 44N 0 2: 1 il x x >- 2, >- 21 1: 1• 1 : 7.1 7.4 Min 40 42 44 46 48 50 i'2T 1 m17 Enhanced Spec:Scan 606(7.23),Qvalue=16 m/z 46.0 4 45 1; 3; 1 0 3i 44N 0 1 X x >- 2, c } 1: ' 1 i 7.1 7.4 ` Min 40 42 44 46 48 50 vT I m/7 11 Ref Spec: 17 Ethanol (NIST) 45 o 0 o_ X >- 46N 43-1 42N1 40 42 44 46 48 50 m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 7.23 45.00 380 0.068334 7.22 46.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:20:09 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 368 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:23:37 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-08.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 17:35:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-11 Client ID: 4651 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 8 Worklist Smp#: 8 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: Al TO15 ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 24 Isopropyl alcohol, CAS: 67-63-0 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 812(8.33) 5, m/z 45.0 4. 45 4 0 4 0 3: 3 x 2 >- 2: N >- 43 44N 1: 21 1, G 8.0 8.3 8.6 i Min 40 42 44 46 48 50 RT 1 1 m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 812(8.33),Qvalue=36 m/z 43.0 4• 45 5, 4 4 N • X 3 X 3. 7< 06 EE1 M >- 2: 43N >- 2 44\ 1: 21 1, 6 1 8.0 8.3 8.6 G Min 40 42 44 46 48 50 RT 1 I m/7 1 Ref Spec: 24 Isopropyl alcohol (NIST) 45 o . 0 CD_ X >- 43N 41N1 39i I i 40 42 44 46 48 50 m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 8.33 45.00 1354 0.049145 8.33 43.00 272 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:20:47 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 369 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:23:37 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-08.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 17:35:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-11 Client ID: 4651 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 8 Worklist Smp#: 8 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 23 Carbon disulfide, CAS: 75-15-0 Processing Results 4 Raw Spec:Scan 789(8.21) 4 m/z 76.0 co 76 3: 3 0 31 44 0 2: x x 21 >- >- 1: 1• 1 8.0 8.3 Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 RT m/7 4 Enhanced Spec:Scan 789(8.21),Qvalue=51 76 3: 0 31 44� X >- 2, 1: 1 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 m/7 11 Ref Spec: 23 Carbon disulfide (NIST) 76 CD _ X >- 44�I Il _ 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 8.21 76.00 749 0.008640 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:20:37 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 370 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:23:37 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-08.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 17:35:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-11 Client ID: 4651 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 8 Worklist Smp#: 8 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: AI_TO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 47 Benzene, CAS: 71-43-2 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 1667(12.90) m/z 78.0 21 44 78 21 1: 11 x 1 x y 1 } • 12.8 Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 �T m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 1667(12.90),Qvalue=1 m/z 77.0 21 44 78 1: •E ip o cOM >,-<. 1 >_ 1 >- 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 12.8 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 47 Benzene (DATA) 78 > X 7751 � 52 38i I I r 76 1 79\I I I 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 12.90 78.00 122 0.001183 12.90 77.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:21:18 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 371 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:23:37 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-08.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 17:35:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-11 Client ID: 4651 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 8 Worklist Smp#: 8 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 56 1 ,4-Dioxane, CAS: 123-91-1 Processing Results 1 Raw Spec:Scan 2030(14.85) m/z 88.0 40 / 1 00 v 1 88 v _o 0 1 X1 X c : i 14.7 15.0 i Min 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 82 86 90 FT I m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 2030(14.85),Qvalue=1 m/z 58.0 1: i 40 88 1 '_ ' I X1 X >. , >- 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 82 86 90 14.7 15.0 m/7 Min 1 Ref Spec: 56 1,4-Dioxane (NIST) 88 o 58N o_ X } 43N 57 r44 87N 421 ( I _ i _ . I 1 _ i 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 82 86 90 m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 14.85 88.00 102 0.004239 14.81 58.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:21:25 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 372 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:23:37 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-08.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 17:35:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-11 Client ID: 4651 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 8 Worklist Smp#: 8 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: Al_TO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 66 trans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene, CAS: 10061-02-6 Processing Results 3 Raw Spec:Scan 2437(17.02) m/z 75.0 207 5' 31 0 4 j 0 0 2 0 31 X X >- 21 >- 2 1 1: 11 G 96� 133 191 I.. i.. I.i. 16.9 17.2 I. Min i 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 FT I m/7 Amdis Enhanced Spec:Scan 2437(17.02),Qvalue=40 m/z 110.0 91 207 7: c • fl; Ea 1 96) 13n 1..191 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 16.9 17.2 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 66 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene (NIST) 75 0 0 _o X >- 39 77� -49 '-112 .1. .-. 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 17.02 75.00 1056 0.018356 17.07 110.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:21:36 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 373 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:23:37 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-08.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 17:35:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-11 Client ID: 4651 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 8 Worklist Smp#: 8 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 ( 0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 75 Chlorobenzene, CAS: 108-90-7 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 2870(19.34) m/z 112.0 / o 117 21 ��, 3: o_ 31 _0 1: x 2 x 1 1 } } 1: 82N • • 1 116N 40"l I 54Iil 181\I 112 1 I 19.2 19.5 ` Min 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 82 86 90 94 98102106110114118 FT i _ m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 2870(19.34),Qvalue=1 3: m/z 77.0 117 3: 31 0 3, 0 2, x x 2, 1: >- >- 1: 1: 82N 1 1 116N 401 I 54Ii1 181\I 1121 I 19.2 19.5 Min 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 82 86 90 94 98102106110114118 FT i m/7 11 Ref Spec: 75 Chlorobenzene (NIST) m/z 114.0 112 1 I ES' 1 0 0 0 XX >- • 77N >-, i 38N1. 51 II I, ..iii I 19.2 19.5 Min i 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 82 86 90 94 98102106110114118 FT m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 19.34 112.00 239 0.002062 19.34 77.00 0 19.34 114.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:21:44 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 374 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:23:37 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-08.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 17:35:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-11 Client ID: 4651 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 8 Worklist Smp#: 8 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: Al_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 76 Ethylbenzene, CAS: 100-41-4 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 2896(19.48) m/z 91.0 21 91 21 11 1: 1. 40N _o 1 X } • 19.3 19.6 Min 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 82 86 90 94 98 gT m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 2896(19.48),Qvalue=1 m/z 106.0 21 91 1: Y C • _� 40N c X 1 X 1 >- 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 82 86 90 94 98 19.3 19.6 m/7 Min 1 Ref Spec: 76 Ethylbenzene (NIST) 91 o ' X 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 82 86 90 94 98 m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 19.48 91.00 256 0.001436 19.47 106.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:21:46 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 375 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:23:37 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-08.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 17:35:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-11 Client ID: 4651 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 8 Worklist Smp#: 8 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: Al_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 84 1 ,1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane, CAS: 79-34-5 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 3326(21.78) 21 m/z 83.0 1.1 2: 1: 2, 0 0 X- 21 83" X 1 r 1: 44 95" 174N >- 1 • 21.7 Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 i2T 1 m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3326(21.78),Qvalue=1 m/z 131.0 2: 6 a 2, E c x 21 83" x >- 1: 44 95N 174N " 1 G 1 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 21.7 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 84 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane (NIST) m/z 85.0 83 o E 0 X X85 X >- >- 60N X61 95 9B 131N p133 168N IIS.. .I1II. ..I IIID. .1111.1_ 1.1.I.. I 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 21.7 m/7 Min — RT Mass Response Amount 21.78 83.00 121 0.001313 21.77 131.00 0 21.77 85.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:21:54 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 376 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:23:37 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-08.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 17:35:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-11 Client ID: 4651 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 8 Worklist Smp#: 8 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: Al_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 85 N-Propylbenzene, CAS: 103-65-1 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 3338(21.84) m/z 91.0 2' 40 91__ 2, 21 2. 0 0 1: x 1: r44 X } 1 } G • 21.7 ` Min 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 82 86 90 94 98 FT 1 m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3338(21.84),Qvalue=l m/z 120.0 2' 40 91� 21 'E • olEIM X 1: X44 X } 1 } • G t 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 82 86 90 94 98 21.7 mh Min 11 Ref Spec: 85 N-Propylbenzene (NIST) m/z 92.0 91 Y 0 >' X >- • >- 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 82 86 90 94 98 21.7 m17 Min RT Mass Response Amount 21.84 91.00 206 0.000903 21.83 120.00 0 21.83 92.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:21:58 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 377 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:23:37 Chrom Revision:2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-08.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 17:35:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-11 Client ID: 4651 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 8 Worklist Smp#: 8 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 88 4-Ethyltoluene, CAS: 622-96-8 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 3371(22.02) m/z 105.0 3 105 3: 31 31 �. o _0 2, x_ 2 40N x r 21 > 1: 1 X44 91N 1 11 21.9 Min 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 82 86 90 94 98 102 106 110 FT m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3371(22.02),Qvalue=1 m/z 120.0 3 105 31 x 2 40N410 X 21 X44 91N > 1 11 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 82 86 90 94 98 102 106 110 21.9 m17 Min 11 Ref Spec: 88 4-Ethyltoluene (NIST) 105 X >- • i 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 82 86 90 94 98 102 106 110 mh RT Mass Response Amount 22.02 105.00 214 0.001100 22.02 120.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:22:01 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 378 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:23:37 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-08.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 17:35:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-11 Client ID: 4651 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 8 Worklist Smp#: 8 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15MasterMethodX.m Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 90 1 ,3,5-Trimethylbenzene, CAS: 108-67-8 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 3371(22.02) 21 m/z 105.0 3 105 31 11 _o o_ x 2 40N x 1 >- 21 744 91N } 1 N 11 N 22.0 Min 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 82 86 90 94 98 102 106110 FT m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3371(22.02),Qvalue=l m/z 120.0 3 105 Y 31 •E • :.x 40\ X >- 1 744 91 N 11 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 82 86 90 94 98 102 106 110 22.0 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 90 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene (NIST) 105 _ X >- 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 82 86 90 94 98 102 106 110 m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 22.02 105.00 214 0.001207 22.11 120.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:22:07 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 379 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:23:37 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-08.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 17:35:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-11 Client ID: 4651 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 8 Worklist Smp#: 8 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 ; Method: TO15_MasterMethodX.m Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 89 2-Chlorotoluene, CAS: 95-49-8 Processing Results 2 Raw Spec:Scan 3374(22.04) 21 m/z 91.0 21 91 1: 0 1: _ X 1 } 1 } • • 21.9 Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 FT m/7 2 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3374(22.04),Qvalue=1 m/z 63.0 21 91 1: X 1 X } 1 } 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 21.9 m/7 Min 1 Ref Spec: 89 2-Chlorotoluene (NIST) 91 X >- i 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 22.04 91.00 111 0.000636 22.03 63.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:22:04 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 380 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:23:37 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-08.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 17:35:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-11 Client ID: 4651 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 8 Worklist Smp#: 8 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 93 1 ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene, CAS: 95-63-6 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 3494(22.68) m/z 105.0 rn 2• 4 105 2• 21 21 cN 0 1C X 1C X r >- 22.6 Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 104 108 �2T m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3494(22.68),Qvalue=1 m/z 120.0 2, 4 105 21 X 1i X >- >- 1 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 104 108 22.6 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 93 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene (NIST) 105 0 CD ' X 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 104 108 mh RT Mass Response Amount 22.68 105.00 135 0.000783 22.68 120.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:22:12 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 381 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:23:37 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-08.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 17:35:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-11 Client ID: 4651 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 8 Worklist Smp#: 8 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: Al 1015 ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 94 sec-Butylbenzene, CAS: 135-98-8 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 3494(22.68) m/z 105.0 i 2, 4 105 O 21 1. 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 104 108 22.8 m/7 Min Enhanced Spec:Scan 3494(22.68),Qvalue=1 m/z 134.0 2, 4 105 21 5 x 1c x >- >- i 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 104 108 22.8 m17 Min 1 Ref Spec: 94 sec-Butylbenzene (NIST) m/z 91.0 105 X X >- >- • 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 104 108 22.8 m/7 Min RT Mass Response Amount 22.68 105.00 135 0.000552 22.90 134.00 0 22.90 91.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:22:15 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 382 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:23:37 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-08.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 17:35:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-11 Client ID: 4651 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 8 Worklist Smp#: 8 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: Al_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 98 Benzyl chloride, CAS: 100-44-7 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 3645(23.49) m/z 91.0 co 3 2 1 31 207N 21 x_ 2 91� x 1 >- 21 r 11 1 11 i 23.4 Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 Fa 1 m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3645(23.49),Qvalue=1 m/z 126.0 3 207" .—>' 31 c • x2 91\ X } 21 ›- 1 1 11 i I 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 23.4 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 98 Benzyl chloride (NIST) m/z 65.0 91 1 T O E O — X X >- • } 126N 65N39� 02 Jy128 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 23.4 m/7 Min RT Mass Response Amount 23.49 91.00 136 0.001208 23.47 126.00 0 23.47 65.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:22:27 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 383 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:23:37 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-08.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 17:35:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-11 Client ID: 4651 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 8 Worklist Smp#: 8 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 100 n-Butylbenzene, CAS: 104-51-8 Processing Results 2: Raw Spec:Scan 3679(23.67) oom z 91.0 20721 co 2A 91N N 0 21 0 1: X- '>-< 1 1• > > 1 i • 23.6 ` Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 AZT i m/7 2s Enhanced Spec:Scan 3679(23.67),Qvalue=1 m/z 134.0 207 2A 91N -3--, •c 721 c x x 1• > >- 1 1 1 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 23.6 m/7 Min 11 Refs pec: 100 n-Butylbenzene (NIST) m/z 92.0 91 O ; C O - O C X_ /92 x >- > • 134" 65N i77\L. - -...I. 39)11. i105..I. ,. ' i 1 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 23.6 m/7 Min RT Mass Response Amount 23.67 91.00 188 0.001154 23.67 134.00 0 23.67 92.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:22:31 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 384 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:23:37 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-08.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 17:35:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-11 Client ID: 4651 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 8 Worklist Smp#: 8 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: AlTO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 ( 0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 101 1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene, CAS: 95-50-1 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 3708(23.82) m/z 146.0 i 31 3 146" 207 31 V 31 0 2 0 2, ): X44 x 1: >- 21 '148 >- 1 1 11 G 23.7 Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 fiT 1 m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3708(23.82),Qvalue=l2 m/z 111.0 3 146N 207 I 3 21 1 • o_ 2 0 1: 1111 44 x 1 >- 21 '148 >- 1 11 G 23.7 i Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 FT 1 m/7 11 Ref Spec: 101 1,2-Dichlorobenzene (NIST) m/z 148.0 146 3' o 31 v o co 0 0 2, X 148 j< N >- ' >- 1: 1 111 75. G 50Ni I I�113 I'150 23.7 ` ..-1. ....73 -.II�- u..- ----- -.��. 1 i Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 VtT 1 m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 23.82 146.00 200 0.001889 23.82 148.00 170 23.81 111.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:22:34 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 385 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:23:37 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-08.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 17:35:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-11 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-11 Client ID: 4651 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 8 Worklist Smp#: 8 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 105 Naphthalene, CAS: 91-20-3 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 4276(26.86) m/z 128.0 5: 128 5, 4: 207N 4 41 3: >- 3 > 2 2' 44" 1: 1: 26.7 27.0 Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 FT m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 4276(26.86),Qvalue=1 5: 128 4: 207" 414111 >- 3 2, 44" 1: 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 n1/7 11 Ref Spec: 105 Naphthal ne (NIST) 128 _o X >- 51\l._64 Ii _.._.102N1 127N1 (129 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 26.86 128.00 1008 0.006846 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:23:33 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 386 of 407 3/7/2019 FORM I AIR - GC/MS VOA ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: TestAmerica Burlington Job No. : 200-47377-1 SDG No. : Client Sample ID: 5948 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-12 tib :;. Matrix: Air Lab File ID: 34588-09.D Analysis Method: TO-15 Date Collected: 02/12/2019 00:00 Sample wt/vol: 200 (mL) Date Analyzed: 02/14/2019 18:27 Soil Aliquot Vol: Dilution Factor: 1 Soil Extract Vol. : GC Column: RTX-624 ID: 0.32 (mm) Moisture: Level: (low/med) Low Analysis Batch No. : 139996 Units: ppb v/v CAS NO. COMPOUND NAME RESULT Q RL RL 115-07-1 Propylene 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 75-71-8 Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-45-6 Freon 22 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 76-14-2 1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 1-4±1 74-87-3 Chloromethane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 106-97-8 n-Butane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-01-4 Vinyl chloride 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 . 106-99-0 1,3-Butadiene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20III 74-83-9 Bromomethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-00-3 Chloroethane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 593-60-2 Bromoethene(Vinyl Bromide) 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-69-4 Trichlorofluoromethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 64-17-5 Ethanol 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 76-13-1 Freon TF 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-35-4 1,l-Dichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 67-64-1 Acetone 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 67-63-0 Isopropyl alcohol 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 75-15-0 Carbon disulfide 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 107-05-1 3-Chloropropene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-09-2 Methylene Chloride 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-65-0 tert-Butyl alcohol 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 1634-04-4 Methyl tert-butyl ether 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 156-60-5 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 110-54-3 n-Hexane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-34-3 1,1-Dichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-05-4 Vinyl acetate 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 141-78-6 Ethyl acetate 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 78-93-3 Methyl Ethyl Ketone 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 156-59-2 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 540-59-0 1,2-Dichloroethene, Total 0.40 U 0.40 0.40 67-66-3 Chloroform 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 109-99-9 Tetrahydrofuran 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 71-55-6 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 110-82-7 Cyclohexane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 56-23-5 Carbon tetrachloride 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 540-84-1 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 FORM I TO-15 Page 387 of 407 3/7/2019 FORM I AIR - GC/MS VOA ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: TestAmerica Burlington Job No. : 200-47377-1 SDG No. : Client Sample ID: 5948 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-12 Matrix: Air Lab File ID: 34588-09.D Analysis Method: TO-15 Date Collected: 02/12/2019 00:00 Sample wt/vol: 200 (mL) Date Analyzed: 02/14/2019 18:27 Soil Aliquot Vol: Dilution Factor: 1 Soil Extract Vol. : GC Column: RTX-624 ID: 0.32 (mm) % Moisture: Level: (low/med) Low Analysis Batch No. : 139996 Units: ppb v/v CAS NO. COMPOUND NAME RESULT Q RL RL 71-43-2 Benzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 107-06-2 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 142-82-5 n-Heptane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 79-01-6 Trichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 80-62-6 Methyl methacrylate 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 78-87-5 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 123-91-1 1,4-Dioxane 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 75-27-4 Bromodichloromethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 4110 10061-01-5 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-10-1 methyl isobutyl ketone 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 108-88-3 Toluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 10061-02-6 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 79-00-5 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 127-18-4 Tetrachloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 591-78-6 Methyl Butyl Ketone (2-Hexanone) 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 124-48-1 Dibromochloromethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 106-93-4 1,2-Dibromoethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-90-7 Chlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20- 100-41-4 Ethylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 179601-23-1 m,p-Xylene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 95-47-6 Xylene, o- 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 1330-20-7 Xylene (total) 0.70 U 0.70 0.70 100-42-5 Styrene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-25-2 Bromoform 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 98-82-8 Cumene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 79-34-5 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 103-65-1 n-Propylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 622-96-8 4-Ethyltoluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-67-8 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 95-49-8 2-Chlorotoluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 98-06-6 tert-Butylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 95-63-6 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 135-98-8 sec-Butylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 99-87-6 4-Isopropyltoluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 541-73-1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 106-46-7 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 FORM I TO-15 Page 388 of 407 3/7/2019 FORM I AIR - GC/MS VOA ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: TestAmerica Burlington Job No. : 200-47377-1 SDG No. : Client Sample ID: 5948 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-12 TS Matrix: Air Lab File ID: 34588-09.D Analysis Method: TO-15 Date Collected: 02/12/2019 00:00 Sample wt/vol: 200 (mL) Date Analyzed: 02/14/2019 18:27 Soil Aliquot Vol: Dilution Factor: 1 Soil Extract Vol. : GC Column: RTX-624 ID: 0.32 (mm) % Moisture: Level: (low/med) Low Analysis Batch No. : 139996 Units: ppb v/v CAS NO. COMPOUND NAME RESULT Q RL RL 100-44-7 Benzyl chloride 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 104-51-8 n-Butylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 95-50-1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 E ,,g 120-82-1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.50 U * 0.50 0.50 87-68-3 Hexachlorobutadiene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 91-20-3 Naphthalene 0.50 U * 0.50 0.50 III El FORM I TO-15 Page 389 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:26:18 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 TestAmerica Burlington Target Compound Quantitation Report Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-09.D Lims ID: 200-47377-A-12 Client ID: 5948 Sample Type: Client Inject. Date: 14-Feb-2019 18:27:30 ALS Bottle#: 9 Worklist Smp#: 9 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Sample Info: 200-0034588-009 Misc. Info.: 47377-12 Operator ID: ggg Instrument ID: CHX.i Method: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\TO 15_MasterMethod_X.m.m Limit Group: Al_TO15ICAL Last Update: 15-Feb-2019 14:26:18 Calib Date: 24-Jan-2019 08:07:30 Integrator: RTE ID Type: Deconvolution ID Quant Method: Internal Standard Quant By: Initial Calibration Last ICaI File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190123-34274.b\34274-17.D Column 1 : RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Det: MS SCAN Process Host: CTX0331 First Level Reviewer: bunmaa Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:26:18 RT Adj RT Dlt RT OnCol Amt Compound Sig (min.) (min.) (min.) Q Response ppb v/v Flags 1 Propene 41 4.078 ND 2 Dichlorodifluoromethane 85 4.169 ND 3 Chlorodifluoromethane 51 4.233 ND U 4 1,2-Dichloro-1,1,2,2-tetra 85 4.506 ND II 5 Chloromethane 50 4.693 ND U 6 Butane 43 4.923 ND U 7 Vinyl chloride 62 4.977 ND 8 Butadiene 54 5.068 ND 10 Bromomethane 94 5.859 ND 11 Chloroethane 64 6.116 ND 13 Vinyl bromide 106 6.539 ND 14 Trichlorofluoromethane 101 6.635 ND 17 Ethanol 45 7.223 ND U 20 1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trif 101 7.721 ND 21 1,1-Dichloroethene 96 7.791 ND 22 Acetone 43 8.037 ND 23 Carbon disulfide 76 8.208 ND 24 Isopropyl alcohol 45 8.304 ND U 25 3-Chloro-1-propene 41 8.593 ND 27 Methylene Chloride 49 8.898 ND 28 2-Methyl-2-propanol 59 9.096 ND 29 Methyl tert-butyl ether 73 9.299 ND 31 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 61 9.347 ND S 30 1,2-Dichloroethene, Total 61 9.665 ND 33 Hexane 57 9.722 ND 34 1,1-Dichloroethane 63 10.251 ND 35 Vinyl acetate 43 10.305 ND 37 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 96 11.369 ND 38 2-Butanone (MEK) 72 11.412 ND 39 Ethyl acetate 88 11.434 ND * 40 Chlorobromomethane 128 11.830 11.830 0.000 63 242903 10.0 Page 390 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:26:18 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-09.D RT Adj RT Dlt RT OnCol Amt Compound Sig (min.) (min.) (min.) Q Response ppb v/v Flags 41 Tetrahydrofuran 42 11.835 ND 42 Chloroform 83 11.947 ND 43 Cyclohexane 84 12.193 ND 44 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 97 12.225 ND 45 Carbon tetrachloride 117 12.461 ND 46 Isooctane 57 12.846 ND 47 Benzene 78 12.905 ND 48 1,2-Dichloroethane 62 13.081 ND 49 n-Heptane 43 13.199 ND " 50 1,4-Difluorobenzene 114 13.675 13.670 0.005 92 1191183 10.0 53 Trichloroethene 95 14.109 ND 54 1,2-Dichloropropane 63 14.622 ND 55 Methyl methacrylate 69 14.740 ND 56 1,4-Dioxane 88 14.815 ND 57 Dibromomethane 174 14.863 ND 58 Dichlorobromomethane 83 15.120 ND 60 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 75 15.970 ND 61 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK 43 16.222 ND 65 Toluene 92 16.516 ND 66 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 75 17.072 ND 67 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 83 17.431 ND 68 Tetrachloroethene 166 17.532 ND 69 2-Hexanone 43 17.837 ND 71 Chlorodibromomethane 129 18.164 ND MI 0 72 Ethylene Dibromide 107 18.431 ND * 74 Chlorobenzene-d5 117 19.287 19.282 0.005 83 998569 10.0 75 Chlorobenzene 112 19.341 ND 76 Ethylbenzene 91 19.474 ND U S 73 Xylenes, Total 106 19.600 ND 78 m-Xylene& p-Xylene 106 19.715 ND 79 o-Xylene 106 20.517 ND 80 Styrene 104 20.571 ND 81 Bromoform 173 20.978 ND 82lsopropylbenzene 105 21.149 ND 84 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 83 21.775 ND 85 N-Propylbenzene 91 21.833 ND 88 4-Ethyltoluene 105 22.015 ND U 89 2-Chlorotoluene 91 22.031 ND 90 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 105 22.112 ND U 92 tert-Butylbenzene 119 22.588 ND 93 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 105 22.679 ND 94 sec-Butylbenzene 105 22.898 ND 95 4-Isopropyltoluene 119 23.096 ND 96 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 146 23.139 ND 97 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 146 23.273 ND MU 98 Benzyl chloride 91 23.470 ND U 100 n-Butylbenzene 91 23.668 ND U 101 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 146 23.813 ND U 103 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 180 26.359 ND U 104 Hexachlorobutadiene 225 26.541 ND 105 Naphthalene 128 26.862 ND U Page 391 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:26:18 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 QC Flag Legend Review Flags M - Manually Integrated U - Marked Undetected Reagents: ATTO15XISs_00002 Amount Added: 20.00 Units: mL Run Reagent Page 392 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date:15-Feb-2019 14:26:18 Chrom Revision:2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-09.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 18:27:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Operator ID: ggg Lims ID: 200-47377-A-12 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-12 Worklist Smp#: 9 Client ID: 5948 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil.Factor: 1.0000 ALS Bottle#: 9 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: AUDI 5_ICAL Column:RTX-624(0.32 mm) Y Scaling:Method Defined:Scale to the Nth Largest Target: 1 il 1 34588-09[MS SCAN Chro]:Total N 00 N 14- _m O 13- M 2 N C N N C N 12 2N 2 N L o 0 11- g 0 4 10- .O 9 0 M OW O O X- 8 c } L N p E 0 E II0 g o 0 U I 4' 3' I 2 r 3.0 5.0 7.0 9.0 11.0 13.0 15.0 17.0 19.0 21.0 23.0 25.0 27.0 29.0 31.0 Min Page 393 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:26:18 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-09.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 18:27:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-12 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-12 Client ID: 5948 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 9 Worklist Smp#: 9 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 3 Chlorodifluoromethane, CAS: 75-45-6 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 23(4.11) m/z 51.0 4: i I 40 1 4 78 0 3; X44 0 1 X' 31 x c r 77N. } 2' ; 1: X51 207 1 i i 4.2 i Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 Fr 1 m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 23(4.11),Qvalue=1 m/z 67.0 4: i 40 45,' 78 0 3 X44 c 311 • 77\ 2, 1: X51 207" 1 i 1 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 4.2 m/7 Min 1 Ref Spec: 3 Chlorodifluoromethane (NIST) m/z 69.0 51 5' T o — o C XX > >- 67" i Id. 50 I..I... .I. .,.. 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 4.2 m/7 Min RT Mass Response Amount 4.11 51.00 49 0.001025 4.23 67.00 0 4.23 69.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:24:01 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 394 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:26:18 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-09.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 18:27:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-12 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-12 Client ID: 5948 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 9 Worklist Smp#: 9 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: AlTO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 5 Chloromethane, CAS: 74-87-3 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 158(4.83) m/z 50.0 7 44N 78 6: 5 >- 4, >- 3 50" 2 39" X51 771 X82 11 G 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 82 86 90 4.6 m/7 Min Enhanced Spec:Scan 158(4.83),Qvalue=11 m/z 52.0 7 44N 78 1 _ 6� 0 • X 5 X >- 4, >- 3 50\ 2 39) X51 77\ 82 11 4.6 ` Min 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 82 86 90 �T m/7 1 Ref Spec: 5 Chloromethane (NIST) 50 0 >- 52 49N1 lil i 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 82 86 90 m17 RT Mass Response Amount 4.83 50.00 142 0.005903 4.69 52.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:24:06 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 395 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:26:18 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-09.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 18:27:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-12 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-12 Client ID: 5948 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 9 Worklist Smp#: 9 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 6 Butane, CAS: 106-97-8 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 171(4.90) 2 m/z 43.0 11 44 21 o 78N 0 11 X_ '>-<- 1 >- • >- • 40" X80 50" 1151 77 . I I ` - 4.8 ` Min 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 82 86 90 VZT I m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 171(4.90),Qvalue=3 m/z 41.0 i y 11 44 3 _oa V 78N 0 21 ' X- x 21ill >- • } 1, • 40" X80 50\I 1151 77\I I I 4.8 ` Min 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 82 86 90 vT 1 m/7 i Ref Spec: 6 Butane (DATA) m/z 58.0 11 43 o _ 0 c X X >- • >- 41" 39� I . I � _ 58iI G 1 1 30 34 38 42 46 50 54 58 62 66 70 74 78 82 86 90 4.8 m/7 Min RT Mass Response Amount 4.90 43.00 74 0.002854 4.90 41.00 322 4.92 58.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:24:09 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 396 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:26:18 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-09.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 18:27:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-12 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-12 Client ID: 5948 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 9 Worklist Smp#: 9 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: AI_TO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 17 Ethanol, CAS: 64-17-5 Processing Results 3 Raw Spec:Scan 609(7.24) m/z 45.0 45 31 44N 31 0 2 0 2• x x �- 21 } 1: 1 1 11 i 7.1 7.4 Min 40 42 44 46 48 50 FT m/7 3 Enhanced Spec:Scan 609(7.24),Qvalue=16 m/z 46.0 45 1 31 44N 2 1 21 >- >- 1 1 11 7.1 7.4 Min 40 42 44 46 48 50 FT m/7 11 Ref Spec: 17 Ethanol (NIST) 45 ' X >- 46' 43N 42NI i 40 42 44 46 48 50 m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 7.24 45.00 349 0.064647 7.22 46.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:24:23 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 397 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:26:18 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-09.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 18:27:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-12 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-12 Client ID: 5948 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 9 Worklist Smp#: 9 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 24 Isopropyl alcohol, CAS: 67-63-0 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 813(8.34) 5 m/z 45.0 4. 45 c 4 0� 0 4 0 3: x 3 >7< 2 >- 2: 44� >- 1: 21 40 ` 1, i 8.1 8.4 ` Min 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 AZT 1 m/7 Amdis Enhanced Spec:Scan 813(8.34),Qvalue=95 m/z 43.0 i o 91 45 2, 7: 21NNE X 6 X 1: >- 5 >_ 1 3• 44" . 2: 1 1 i 8.1 8.4 iMin 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 VZT 1 m/7 11 Ref Spec: 24 Isopropyl alcohol (NIST) 45 0 0 o_ X 43" 39N1 41'1 1 1 G 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 8.34 45.00 1067 0.039892 8.34 43.00 286 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:24:41 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 398 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:26:18 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-09.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 18:27:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-12 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-12 Client ID: 5948 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 9 Worklist Smp#: 9 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: T015_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: Al_T015ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 76 Ethylbenzene, CAS: 100-41-4 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 2860(19.29) m/z 91.0 3 117 61 0 31 51 0 41 2 X } 21 82 31 21 1 -_119 11 11 54 . I.1.. 76� . . 1 I 19.2 19.5 I.i_�� . -.. Min 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 RT m/7 Amdis Enhanced Spec:Scan 2860(19.29),Qvalue=45 m/z 106.0 91 116 7: X 6 } 5 81 >- 3'3• 2: 1 118 531 I . . • ... i i l l 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 19.2 19.5 mh Min 11 Ref Spec: 76 Ethylbenzene(NIST) 91 o X • } 106 39 51� 65� 77 X92 .1.. ..��i 78 -. I .1.I 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 m17 RT Mass Response Amount 19.29 91.00 1712 0.010084 19.47 106.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:25:18 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 399 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:26:18 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-09.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 18:27:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-12 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-12 Client ID: 5948 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 9 Worklist Smp#: 9 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 88 4-Ethyltoluene, CAS: 622-96-8 Processing Results 3 Raw Spec:Scan 3369(22.01) m/z 105.1 21 31 1: N 2 105'` x 1 >- 21 r 1 • • 11 21.9 Min 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 104 108 FT m/7 3 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3369(22.01),Qvalue=1 m/z 120.0 31 EIMES 0 2 X 105 >- 21 >- 1 1 11 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 104 108 21.9 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 88 4-Ethyltoluene (NIST) 105 > 0 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 104 108 m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 22.01 105.00 182 0.000982 22.02 120.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:25:30 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 400 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:26:18 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-09.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 18:27:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-12 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-12 Client ID: 5948 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 9 Worklist Smp#: 9 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethodX.m Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 90 1 ,3,5-Trimethylbenzene, CAS: 108-67-8 Processing Results 3 Raw Spec:Scan 3369(22.01) m/z 105.0 31 'c 0 2 105 >- 21 >- 1 1 11 i i I 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 104 108 22.0 m17 Min 3 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3369(22.01),Qvalue=1 m/z 120.0 31 •E 0 2 105 x } 21 >- 1 1 11 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 104 108 22.0 m/7 /An 11 Ref Spec: 90 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene (NIST) 105 > X 40 44 48 52 56 60 64 68 72 76 80 84 88 92 96 100 104 108 r11/7 RT Mass Response Amount 22.01 105.00 182 0.001078 22.11 120.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:25:33 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 401 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:26:19 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-09.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 18:27:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-12 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-12 Client ID: 5948 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 9 Worklist Smp#: 9 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: Al_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 ( 0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 97 1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene, CAS: 106-46-7 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 3607(23.28) m/z 146.0 3 ' 31 co coN 038 207 0 2, co X 2 X 1: >- 21 146" >- 1 1 744 11 i 23.2 ` Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 FT 1 m17 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3607(23.28),Qvalue=1 m/z 111.0 3 31 207 o c X 2 R IF >- 21 146N >- 1 744 11 G i 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 23.2 m17 Min 11 Ref Spec: 97 1,4-Dichlorobenzene (NIST) m/z 148.0 146 2, 0 21 y 0 _o _0 1; X- '148 >< ' 1 >- >- • 111N 50N75N i.,l1 .I11, ,, . ., '113 .17150 23.2 ` IMin 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 KT 1 m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 23.28 146.00 185 0.001931 23.28 148.00 214 23.27 111.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:25:55 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 402 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:26:19 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-09.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 18:27:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-12 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-12 Client ID: 5948 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 9 Worklist Smp#: 9 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 98 Benzyl chloride, CAS: 100-44-7 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 3642(23.47) 21 m/z 91.0 21 40' 91 207 1: I 1: 0 0 X1 x1 } 1 } • 6 23.4 ` Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 f2T mh Enhanced Spec:Scan 3642(23.47),Qvalue=1 m/z 126.0 21 40N 91 207 T 1 11 1• X >_ 1 } i i i 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 23.4 m/7 Min 1 Ref Spec: 98 Benzyl chloride (NIST) m/z 65.0 91 > 0 c X X } >- • 126 65 89 1192 1028 t I 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 23.4 mh Min RT Mass Response Amount 23.47 91.00 117 0.001091 23.47 126.00 0 23.47 65.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:25:58 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 403 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:26:19 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-09.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 18:27:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-12 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-12 Client ID: 5948 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 9 Worklist Smp#: 9 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: AI_TO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 100 n-Butylbenzene, CAS: 104-51-8 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 3642(23.47) m/z 91.0 21 40N . 207 1 1: 1 _o 0 1 X ` >- 1 >- 23.6 ` Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 RT m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3642(23.47),Qvalue=1 m/z 134.0 21 40N 91 207 1: •E X 1411 1 } G i 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 23.6 m/7 Min 1 Ref Spec: 100 n-Butylbenzene (NIST) m/z 92.0 91 .E E s /92 >- >- 134 65 105�I -.,.I. 78)I. 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 23.6 m17 Min RT Mass Response Amount 23.47 91.00 117 0.000754 23.67 134.00 0 23.67 92.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:26:01 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 404 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:26:19 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-09.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 18:27:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-12 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-12 Client ID: 5948 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 9 Worklist Smp#: 9 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethodX.m Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 ( 0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 101 1 ,2-Dichlorobenzene, CAS: 95-50-1 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 3706(23.81) m/z 146.0 M 2, 146 207N 21 i�` 21 �' 0 21 v44 01� X 1' X 1 >- } 1 G 23.7 i Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 FT I m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3706(23.81),Qvalue=l m/z 111.0 2, 146 207N a ElE1. ! : ' 1 • i 1 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 23.7 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 101 1,2-Dichlorobenzene (NIST) 1 m/z 148.0 146 1 o 0 0 1 X '148 X e >- } • 111N 75N G 50� '113 '150 23.7 i - -.��i-.1. ....73 -.II 1- u..- ----- II 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 FT I m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 23.81 146.00 225 0.002231 23.81 111.00 0 23.81 148.00 0 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:26:05 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 405 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:26:19 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-09.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 18:27:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-12 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-12 Client ID: 5948 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 9 Worklist Smp#: 9 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: Al_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 103 1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene, CAS: 120-82-1 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 4180(26.35) m/z 180.0 i c 207 2 ,,,- 38 0 31 180'S" o 21 N X 2 40N x 1 } 1: X44 r 11 1 i 26.2 26.5 ` Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 FT mh Enhanced Spec:Scan 4180(26.35),Qvalue=1 m/z 182.0 207 31 3: 2 '' ME X 31 40� 180N X 21 >- 2, >_ 1 1: X44 11 1 i 26.2 26.5 Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 FT I m/7 11 Ref Spec: 103 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene (NIST) 180 182 o 0 o_ X >- 145N ' '184 109N1 X147 74) 50Ni 72� I X755 v111 G 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 mh RT Mass Response Amount 26.35 180.00 431 0.009244 26.37 182.00 354 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:26:08 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 406 of 407 3/7/2019 Report Date: 15-Feb-2019 14:26:19 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHX.i\20190214-34588.b\34588-09.D Injection Date: 14-Feb-2019 18:27:30 Instrument ID: CHX.i Lims ID: 200-47377-A-12 Lab Sample ID: 200-47377-12 Client ID: 5948 Operator ID: ggg ALS Bottle#: 9 Worklist Smp#: 9 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_X.m Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 105 Naphthalene, CAS: 91-20-3 Processing Results 41 Raw Spec:Scan 4276(26.86) m/z 128.0 7 CN 3; 207 3 128 co 31 N 0 31 0 2 2 >" 21 v.44 ;_-"" 1: 1 1 11 26.6 26.9 Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 9T m/7 Amdis Enhanced Spec:Scan 4276(26.86),Qvalue=93 91 128 7 6• >- 5 3• 2: 1 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 m/7 11 Ref Spec: 105 Naphthalene (NIST) 128 0 X >- 51N I._64 102N1. 127 II(129 i 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 26.86 128.00 875 0.006238 Reviewer: bunmaa, 15-Feb-2019 14:26:15 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 407 of 407 3/7/2019 1 {1- 111 '''''...c.--' �rxlr�>� �4 TestAmerica 4 f. 3F �a -. y,. THE LEADER IN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING ANALYTICAL REPORT •.,•.,,,..,,, TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. TestAmerica Burlington 30 Community Drive £' Suite 11 South Burlington, VT 05403 Tel: (802)660-1990 _ropp......... ., r TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47662-1 _. i1 TestAmerica Sample DeliveryGroup: 200-47662-1 x ' . - , Client Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows For: x -£ - Wenck Associates, Inc 1802 Wooddale Drive , , Suite 100 .` Woodbury, Minnesota 55125 ..zzs�. . Attn: Michelle Hosfield -:----J';',. .117.-; --;- ::- ',I - '''' 1-:-, I1. 2j.IA't KiiitAle1/4)fe•di Authorized for release by: • u .< �x a 3/15/2019 4:52:44 PM j4 , ,', M1 Kathryn Kelly, Project Manager II � � h � (802)923-1021 -� ' '. kathryn.kelly@testamericainc.com .)Yl. results through TOtc��4ccs . F mesti ` ?a , xie,, , The test results in this report meet all 2003 NELAC and 2009 TNI requirements for accredited 3 �� parameters,exceptions are noted in this report. This report may not be reproduced except in full, " s°:< GX•e rt ,- and with written approval from the laboratory.For questions please contact the Project Manager at the e-mail address or telephone number listed on this page. This report has been electronically signed and authorized by the signatory.Electronic signature is intended to be the legally binding equivalent of a traditionally handwritten signature. Visit us at: : :4. •r Results relate only to the items tested and the sample(s)as received by the laboratory. , www.testamericainc come Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47662-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG:200-47662-1 • Table of Contents Cover Page 1 Table of Contents 2 Definitions/Glossary 3 Case Narrative 4 Detection Summary 5 Client Sample Results 7 QC Sample Results 12 QC Association Summary 17 Lab Chronicle 18 Certification Summary 19 Method Summary 20 Sample Summary 21 Canister QC Documents 22 Chain of Custody 23 Receipt Checklists 25 Clean Canister Certification 26 Pre-Ship Certification 26 Clean Canister Data 28 Page 2 of 55 TestAmerica3/15Burl/20ing19ton Definitions/Glossary Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47662-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 200-47662-1 Qualifiers Air-GC/MS VOA Qualifier Qualifier Description U Indicates the analyte was analyzed for but not detected. J Result is less than the RL but greater than or equal to the MDL and the concentration is an approximate value. LCS or LCSD is outside acceptance limits. E Result exceeded calibration range. D Sample results are obtained from a dilution;the surrogate or matrix spike recoveries reported are calculated from diluted samples. Air -GC/MS VOA TICs Qualifier Qualifier Description J Indicates an Estimated Value for TICs N This flag indicates the presumptive evidence of a compound. D Sample results are obtained from a dilution;the surrogate or matrix spike recoveries reported are calculated from diluted samples. J Result is less than the RL but greater than or equal to the MDL and the concentration is an approximate value. Air-GC VOA Qualifier Qualifier Description U Indicates the analyte was analyzed for but not detected. Glossary _ - -------- Abbreviation These commonly used abbreviations may or may not be present in this report. Listed under the"D"column to designate that the result is reported on a dry weight basis %R Percent Recovery CFL Contains Free Liquid CNF Contains No Free Liquid DER Duplicate Error Ratio(normalized absolute difference) Dil Fac Dilution Factor DL Detection Limit(DoD/DOE) DL,RA,RE,IN Indicates a Dilution,Re-analysis,Re-extraction,or additional Initial metals/anion analysis of the sample DLC Decision Level Concentration(Radiochemistry) EDL Estimated Detection Limit(Dioxin) LOD Limit of Detection(DoD/DOE) LOQ Limit of Quantitation(DoD/DOE) MDA Minimum Detectable Activity(Radiochemistry) MDC Minimum Detectable Concentration(Radiochemistry) MDL Method Detection Limit ML Minimum Level(Dioxin) NC Not Calculated ND Not Detected at the reporting limit(or MDL or EDL if shown) PQL Practical Quantitation Limit QC Quality Control RER Relative Error Ratio(Radiochemistry) RL Reporting Limit or Requested Limit(Radiochemistry) RPD Relative Percent Difference,a measure of the relative difference between two points TEF Toxicity Equivalent Factor(Dioxin) TEQ Toxicity Equivalent Quotient(Dioxin) TestAmerica Burlington Page 3 of 55 3/15/2019 Case Narrative Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47662-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 200-47662-1 Job ID: 200-47662-1 Laboratory: TestAmerica Burlington 4 Narrative CASE NARRATIVE Client: Wenck Associates, Inc Project: Eisinger Meadows Report Number: 200-47662-1 With the exceptions noted as flags or footnotes, standard analytical protocols were followed in the analysis of the samples and no problems were encountered or anomalies observed. In addition all laboratory quality control samples were within established control limits,with any exceptions noted below. Each sample was analyzed to achieve the lowest possible reporting limit within the constraints of the method. In some cases, due to interference or analytes present at high concentrations,samples were diluted. For diluted samples, the reporting limits are adjusted relative to the dilution required. • Calculations are performed before rounding to avoid round-off errors in calculated results. All holding times were met and proper preservation noted for the methods performed on these samples, unless otherwise detailed in the individual sections below. ECEIPT he samples were received on 03/05/2019;the samples arrived in good condition. FIXED GASES Samples SV-3 and SV-15 were analyzed for Fixed Gases in accordance with EPA Method 3C.The samples were analyzed on 03/06/2019. Samples SV-3[1.48X]and SV-15[1.37X]required dilution prior to analysis. The reporting limits have been adjusted accordingly. No analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described above or in the Definitions/Glossary page. VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS Samples SV-3 and SV-15 were analyzed for Volatile Organic Compounds in accordance with EPA Method TO-15.The samples were analyzed on 03/12/2019. 1,2-Dichlorobenzene, 1,4-Dichlorobenzene and Hexachlorobutadiene were detected in method blank MB 200-140742/5 at levels that were above the method detection limit but below the reporting limit. The values should be considered estimates, and have been flagged. If the associated sample reported a result above the MDL and/or RL,the result has been flagged. Refer to the QC report for details. Methyl Butyl Ketone(2-Hexanone)failed the recovery criteria high for LCS 200-140742/4. Refer to the QC report for details. Samples SV-3[4X], SV-15[24.8X]and SV-15[3.01X]required dilution prior to analysis. The reporting limits have been adjusted accordingly. No additional analytical or quality issues were noted,other than those described above or in the Definitions/Glossary page. TestAmerica Burlington Page 4 of 55 3/15/219 Detection Summary Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47662-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 200-47662-1 Client Sample ID: SV-3 Lab Sample ID: 200-47662-1 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type Propylene 81 34 22 ug/m3 4 TO-15 Total/NA 1,3-Butadiene 5.3 1.8 0.58 ug/m3 4 TO-15 Total/NA Ethanol 42 38 9.0 ug/m3 4 TO-15 Total/NA Acetone 49 48 25 ug/m3 4 TO-15 Total/NA Isopropyl alcohol 35 J 49 18 ug/m3 4 TO-15 Total/NA n-Hexane 160 2.8 2.3 ug/m3 4 TO-15 Total/NA Ethyl acetate 21 J 72 16 ug/m3 4 TO-15 Total/NA Methyl Ethyl Ketone 16 5.9 2.4 ug/m3 4 TO-15 Total/NA Cyclohexane 86 2.8 0.87 ug/m3 4 TO-15 Total/NA Benzene 53 2.6 0.91 ug/m3 4 TO-15 Total/NA n-Heptane 91 3.3 2.3 ug/m3 4 TO-15 Total/NA Toluene 77 3.0 1.0 ug/m3 4 TO-15 Total/NA Ethylbenzene 14 3.5 1.3 ug/m3 4 TO-15 Total/NA m,p-Xylene 50 8.7 1.2 ug/m3 4 TO-15 Total/NA Xylene,o- 19 3.5 1.2 ug/m3 4 TO-15 Total/NA 4-Ethyltoluene 5.3 3.9 1.4 ug/m3 4 TO-15 Total/NA 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 7.9 3.9 1.1 ug/m3 4 TO-15 Total/NA 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 13 3.9 1.6 ug/m3 4 TO-15 Total/NA Client Sample ID: SV-15 Lab Sample ID: 200-47662-2 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type Propylene 260 E 26 17 ug/m3 3.01 TO-15 Total/NA 1,3-Butadiene 24 1.3 0.43 ug/m3 3.01 TO-15 Total/NA Ethanol 53 28 6.8 ug/m3 3.01 TO-15 Total/NA Acetone 67 36 19 ug/m3 3.01 TO-15 Total/NA Isopropyl alcohol 48 37 13 ug/m3 3.01 TO-15 Total/NA Carbon disulfide 7.9 4.7 1.1 ug/m3 3.01 TO-15 Total/NA Methylene Chloride 3.8 J 5.2 2.1 ug/m3 3.01 TO-15 Total/NA Methyl tert-butyl ether 1.8 J 2.2 0.66 ug/m3 3.01 TO-15 Total/NA n-Hexane 1700 E 2.1 1.7 ug/m3 3.01 TO-15 Total/NA 1,1-Dichloroethane 4.7 2.4 0.32 ug/m3 3.01 TO-15 Total/NA Ethyl acetate 140 54 12 ug/m3 3.01 TO-15 Total/NA Methyl Ethyl Ketone 12 4.4 1.8 ug/m3 3.01 TO-15 Total/NA cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 9.6 2.4 0.44 ug/m3 3.01 TO-15 Total/NA Chloroform 270 2.9 0.76 ug/m3 3.01 TO-15 Total/NA Cyclohexane 990 E 2.1 0.65 ug/m3 3.01 TO-15 Total/NA Benzene 490 E 1.9 0.68 ug/m3 3.01 TO-15 Total/NA n-Heptane 1000 E 2.5 1.7 ug/m3 3.01 TO-15 Total/NA Toluene 900 E 2.3 0.78 ug/m3 3.01 TO-15 Total/NA Ethylbenzene 170 2.6 0.95 ug/m3 3.01 TO-15 Total/NA m,p-Xylene 660 6.5 0.91 ug/m3 3.01 TO-15 Total/NA Xylene,o- 250 2.6 0.93 ug/m3 3.01 TO-15 Total/NA Styrene 7.9 2.6 1.1 ug/m3 3.01 TO-15 Total/NA 4-Ethyltoluene 86 3.0 1.0 ug/m3 3.01 TO-15 Total/NA 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 110 3.0 0.86 ug/m3 3.01 TO-15 Total/NA 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 180 3.0 1.2 ug/m3 3.01 TO-15 Total/NA Propylene-DL 400 D 210 140 ug/m3 24.8 TO-15 Total/NA 1,3-Butadiene-DL 35 D 11 3.6 ug/m3 24.8 TO-15 Total/NA Ethanol-DL 69 J D 230 56 ug/m3 24.8 TO-15 Total/NA This Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results. TestAmerica Burlington Page 5 of 55 3/15/2019 Detection Summary Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47662-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 200-47662-1 Client Sample ID: SV-15 (Continued) Lab Sample ID: 200-47662-2 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type Carbon disulfide-DL 9.7 J D 39 9.3 ug/m3 24.8 TO-15 Total/NA n-Hexane-DL 2900 D 17 14 ug/m3 24.8 TO-15 Total/NA Ethyl acetate-DL 120 J D 450 98 ug/m3 24.8 TO-15 Total/NA 1E1 Cyclohexane-DL 1100 D 17 5.4 ug/m3 24.8 TO-15 Total/NA Benzene-DL 610 D 16 5.6 ug/m3 24.8 TO-15 Total/NA n-Heptane-DL 1800 D 20 14 ug/m3 24.8 TO-15 Total/NA Toluene-DL 970 D 19 6.4 ug/m3 24.8 TO-15 Total/NA Ethylbenzene-DL 210 D 22 7.9 ug/m3 24.8 TO-15 Total/NA m,p-Xylene-DL 740 D 54 7.5 ug/m3 24.8 TO-15 Total/NA Xylene,o--DL 270 D 22 7.6 ug/m3 24.8 TO-15 Total/NA 4-Ethyltoluene-DL 100 D 24 8.4 ug/m3 24.8 TO-15 Total/NA 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene-DL 130 D 24 7.1 ug/m3 24.8 TO-15 Total/NA 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene-DL 200 D 24 9.8 ug/m3 24.8 TO-15 Total/NA Itsi.1- his Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results. TestAmerica Burlington Page 6 of 55 3/15/2019 Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47662-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 200-47662-1 Client Sample ID: SV-3 Lab Sample ID: 200-47662-1 Date Collected: 03/01/19 08:56 Matrix: Air Date Received: 03/05/19 10:02 Sample Container: Summa Canister 1L Method: TO-15 -Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air <' ,x Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac C Propylene 81 34 22 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 6 Dichlorodifluoromethane 9.9 U 9.9 4.0 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 5.6 U 5.6 1.9 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 Chloromethane 4.1 U 4.1 2.1 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 Vinyl chloride 2.0 U 2.0 0.42 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 1,3-Butadiene 5.3 1.8 0.58 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 Bromomethane 3.1 U 3.1 0.96 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 Chloroethane 5.3 U 5.3 2.2 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 Trichlorofluoromethane 4.5 U 4.5 1.4 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 Ethanol 42 38 9.0 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 Freon TF 6.1 U 6.1 0.95 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 1,1-Dichloroethene 3.2 U 3.2 0.54 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 Acetone 49 48 25 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 Isopropyl alcohol 35 J 49 18 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 Carbon disulfide 6.2 U 6.2 1.5 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 Methylene Chloride 6.9 U 6.9 2.8 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 Methyl tert-butyl ether 2.9 U 2.9 0.88 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 3.2 U 3.2 1.2 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 n-Hexane 160 2.8 2.3 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 1,1-Dichloroethane 3.2 U 3.2 0.42 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 Vinyl acetate 70 U 70 32 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 Ethyl acetate 21 J 72 16 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 Methyl Ethyl Ketone 16 5.9 2.4 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 3.2 U 3.2 0.59 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 Chloroform 3.9 U 3.9 1.0 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 Tetrahydrofuran 59 U 59 31 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 4.4 U 4.4 1.5 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 Cyclohexane 86 2.8 0.87 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 Carbon tetrachloride 5.0 U 5.0 0.60 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 Benzene 53 2.6 0.91 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 1,2-Dichloroethane 3.2 U 3.2 1.0 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 n-Heptane 91 3.3 2.3 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 Trichloroethene 4.3 U 4.3 0.64 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 1,2-Dichloropropane 3.7 U 3.7 2.2 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 Bromodichloromethane 5.4 U 5.4 2.5 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 3.6 U 3.6 1.8 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 Methyl isobutyl ketone 8.2 U 8.2 5.9 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 Toluene 77 3.0 1.0 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 3.6 U 3.6 2.2 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 4.4 U 4.4 1.7 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 Tetrachloroethene 5.4 U 5.4 0.79 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 Methyl Butyl Ketone(2-Hexanone) 8.2 U 8.2 6.9 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 1,2-Dibromoethane 6.1 U 6.1 2.1 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 Chlorobenzene 3.7 U 3.7 0.74 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 Ethylbenzene 14 3.5 1.3 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 m,p-Xylene 50 8.7 1.2 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 Xylene,o- 19 3.5 1.2 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 Styrene 3.4 U 3.4 1.5 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 TestAmerica Burlington Page 7 of 55 3/15/2019 Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47662-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 200-47662-1 ;:Iient Sample ID: SV-3 Lab Sample ID: 200-47662-1 Date Collected: 03/01/19 08:56 Matrix: Air Date Received: 03/05/19 10:02 Sample Container: Summa Canister 1L Method: TO-15 -Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air(Continued) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Bromoform 8.3 U 8.3 3.6 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 Ell 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 5.5 U 5.5 2.1 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 4-Ethyltoluene 5.3 3.9 1.4 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 7.9 3.9 1.1 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 13 3.9 1.6 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 4.8 U 4.8 2.0 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 4.8 U 4.8 1.6 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 Benzyl chloride 4.1 U 4.1 2.5 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 4.8 U 4.8 1.7 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 15 U 15 7.1 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 Hexachlorobutadiene 8.5 U 8.5 3.5 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 Naphthalene 10 U* 10 6.5 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 Dibromochloromethane 6.8 U 6.8 2.4 ug/m3 03/12/19 04:54 4 Tentatively Identified Compound Est.Result Qualifier Unit D RT CAS No. Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Butane,2-methyl- 92 J N ppb v/v 4.77 78-78-4 03/12/19 04:54 4 Pentane 40 J N ppb vN 5.33 109-66-0 03/12/19 04:54 4 Pentane,2-methyl- 150 J N ppb v/v 7.11 107-83-5 03/12/19 04:54 4 Pentane,3-methyl- 98 J N ppb vN 7.54 96-14-0 03/12/19 04:54 4 Pentane,2,4-dimethyl- 34 J N ppb vN 8.81 108-08-7 03/12/19 04:54 4 Cyclopentane,methyl- 75 J N ppb v/v 9.00 96-37-7 03/12/19 04:54 4 Hexane,2-methyl- 48 J N ppb v/v 9.85 591-76-4 03/12/19 04:54 4 Hexane,3-methyl- 69 J N ppb v/v 10.12 589-34-4 03/12/19 04:54 4 Cyclohexane,methyl- 48 J N ppb vN 11.64 108-87-2 03/12/19 04:54 4 Unknown 26 J ppb vN 12.16 03/12/19 04:54 4 Method: EPA 3C - Fixed Gases from Stationary Sources Analyte Result Qualifier RL RL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Methane 0.059 U 0.059 0.059 %v/v 03/06/19 15:37 1.48 Client Sample ID: SV-15 Lab Sample ID: 200-47662-2 Date Collected: 03/01/19 09:28 Matrix: Air Date Received: 03/05/19 10:02 Sample Container: Summa Canister 1L Method: TO-15 -Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Propylene 260 E 26 17 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 Dichlorodifluoromethane 7.4 U 7.4 3.0 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 4.2 U 4.2 1.4 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 Chloromethane 3.1 U 3.1 1.6 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 Vinyl chloride 1.5 U 1.5 0.32 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 1,3-Butadiene 24 1.3 0.43 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 Bromomethane 2.3 U 2.3 0.72 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 Chloroethane 4.0 U 4.0 1.7 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 Trichlorofluoromethane 3.4 U 3.4 1.0 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 Ethanol 53 28 6.8 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 Freon TF 4.6 U 4.6 0.72 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 1,1-Dichloroethene 2.4 U 2.4 0.41 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 TestAmerica Burlington Page 8 of 55 3/15/2019 Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47662-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 200-47662-1 Client Sample ID: SV-15 Lab Sample ID: 200-47662-2 Date Collected: 03/01/19 09:28 Matrix: Air Date Received: 03/05/19 10:02 Sample Container: Summa Canister 1L Method: TO-15 -Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air(Continued) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Acetone 67 36 19 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 6 Isopropyl alcohol 48 37 13 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 Carbon disulfide 7.9 4.7 1.1 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 Methylene Chloride 3.8 J 5.2 2.1 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 Methyl tert-butyl ether 1.8 J 2.2 0.66 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 2.4 U 2.4 0.88 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 n-Hexane 1700 E 2.1 1.7 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 1,1-Dichloroethane 4.7 2.4 0.32 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 Vinyl acetate 53 U 53 24 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 Ethyl acetate 140 54 12 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 Methyl Ethyl Ketone 12 4.4 1.8 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 9.6 2.4 0.44 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 Chloroform 270 2.9 0.76 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 Tetrahydrofuran 44 U 44 23 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 3.3 U 3.3 1.1 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 Cyclohexane 990 E 2.1 0.65 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 Carbon tetrachloride 3.8 U 3.8 0.45 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 Benzene 490 E 1.9 0.68 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 1,2-Dichloroethane 2.4 U 2.4 0.77 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 n-Heptane 1000 E 2.5 1.7 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 Trichloroethene 3.2 U 3.2 0.49 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 1,2-Dichloropropane 2.8 U 2.8 1.7 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 Bromodichloromethane 4.0 U 4.0 1.9 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 2.7 U 2.7 1.3 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 Methyl isobutyl ketone 6.2 U 6.2 4.4 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 Toluene 900 E 2.3 0.78 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 2.7 U 2.7 1.6 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 3.3 U 3.3 1.3 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 Tetrachloroethene 4.1 U 4.1 0.59 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 Methyl Butyl Ketone(2-Hexanone) 6.2 U 6.2 5.2 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 1,2-Dibromoethane 4.6 U 4.6 1.6 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 Chlorobenzene 2.8 U 2.8 0.55 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 Ethylbenzene 170 2.6 0.95 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 m,p-Xylene 660 6.5 0.91 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 Xylene,o- 250 2.6 0.93 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 Styrene 7.9 2.6 1.1 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 Bromoform 6.2 U 6.2 2.7 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 4.1 U 4.1 1.6 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 4-Ethyltoluene 86 3.0 1.0 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 110 3.0 0.86 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 180 3.0 1.2 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 3.6 U 3.6 1.5 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 3.6 U 3.6 1.2 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 Benzyl chloride 3.1 U 3.1 1.9 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 3.6 U 3.6 1.3 ug/m3 03/12/1906:39 3.01 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 11 U 11 5.4 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 Hexachlorobutadiene 6.4 U 6.4 2.6 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 Naphthalene 7.9 U* 7.9 4.9 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 TestAmerica Burlington Page 9 of 55 3/15/2019 Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47662-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 200-47662-1 :lient Sample ID: SV-15 Lab Sample ID: 200-47662-2 Date Collected: 03/01/19 09:28 Matrix: Air Date Received: 03/05/19 10:02 Sample Container: Summa Canister 1L Method: TO-15 -Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air(Continued) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Dibromochloromethane 5.1 U 5.1 1.8 ug/m3 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 6 Tentatively Identified Compound Est.Result Qualifier Unit D RT CAS No. Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Butane,2-methyl- 390 J N ppb v/v 4.79 78-78-4 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 Pentane, 2-methyl- 710 J N ppb v/v 7.14 107-83-5 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 Pentane,2,4-dimethyl- 210 J N ppb v/v 8.83 108-08-7 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 Cyclopentane,methyl- 360 J N ppb v/v 9.02 96-37-7 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 Hexane,2-methyl- 280 J N ppb v/v 9.88 591-76-4 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 Hexane,3-methyl- 370 J N ppb v/v 10.15 589-34-4 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 Cyclopentane, 1,2-dimethyl- 210 J N ppb v/v 10.69 2452-99-5 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 Cyclohexane,methyl- 440 J N ppb v/v 11.66 108-87-2 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 1-Heptene,4-methyl- 260 J N ppb v/v 12.19 13151-05-8 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 Heptane, 2-methyl- 240 J N ppb v/v 12.42 592-27-8 03/12/19 06:39 3.01 Method: TO-15 -Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air - DL Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac i. i Propylene 400 D 210 140 ug/m3 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 Dichlorodifluoromethane 61 U 61 25 ug/m3 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 35 U 35 12 ug/m3 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 Chloromethane 26 U 26 13 ug/m3 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 Vinyl chloride 13 U 13 2.6 ug/m3 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 1,3-Butadiene 35 D 11 3.6 ug/m3 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 Bromomethane 19 U 19 6.0 ug/m3 03/12/1916:47 24.8 Chloroethane 33 U 33 14 ug/m3 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 Trichlorofluoromethane 28 U 28 8.6 ug/m3 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 Ethanol 69 J D 230 56 ug/m3 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 Freon TF 38 U 38 5.9 ug/m3 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 1,1-Dichloroethene 20 U 20 3.3 ug/m3 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 Acetone 290 U 290 150 ug/m3 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 Isopropyl alcohol 300 U 300 110 ug/m3 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 Carbon disulfide 9.7 J D 39 9.3 ug/m3 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 Methylene Chloride 43 U 43 17 ug/m3 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 Methyl tert-butyl ether 18 U 18 5.5 ug/m3 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 20 U 20 7.3 ug/m3 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 n-Hexane 2900 D 17 14 ug/m3 03/12/1916:47 24.8 1,1-Dichloroethane 20 U 20 2.6 ug/m3 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 Vinyl acetate 440 U 440 200 ug/m3 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 Ethyl acetate 120 J D 450 98 ug/m3 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 Methyl Ethyl Ketone 37 U 37 15 ug/m3 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 20 U 20 3.6 ug/m3 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 Chloroform 24 U 24 6.3 ug/m3 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 Tetrahydrofuran 370 U 370 190 ug/m3 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 27 U 27 9.2 ug/m3 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 Cyclohexane 1100 D 17 5.4 ug/m3 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 Carbon tetrachloride 31 U 31 3.7 ug/m3 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 Benzene 610 D 16 5.6 ug/m3 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 1,2-Dichloroethane 20 U 20 6.3 ug/m3 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 n-Heptane 1800 D 20 14 ug/m3 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 Trichloroethene 27 U 27 4.0 ug/m3 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 TestAmerica Burlington Page 10 of 55 3/15/2019 Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47662-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 200-47662-1 Client Sample ID: SV-15 Lab Sample ID: 200-47662-2 Date Collected: 03/01/19 09:28 Matrix: Air Date Received: 03/05/19 10:02 Sample Container: Summa Canister 1L Method: TO-15 -Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air-DL(Continued) r:;,-..;..,.; Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 1,2-Dichloropropane 23 U 23 14 ug/m3 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 6 Bromodichloromethane 33 U 33 16 ug/m3 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 23 U 23 11 ug/m3 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 Methyl isobutyl ketone 51 U 51 37 ug/m3 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 Toluene 970 D 19 6.4 ug/m3 03/12/1916:47 24.8 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 23 U 23 14 ug/m3 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 27 U 27 11 ug/m3 03/12/1916:47 24.8 Tetrachloroethene 34 U 34 4.9 ug/m3 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 Methyl Butyl Ketone(2-Hexanone) 51 U* 51 43 ug/m3 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 1,2-Dibromoethane 38 U 38 13 ug/m3 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 Chlorobenzene 23 U 23 4.6 ug/m3 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 Ethylbenzene 210 D 22 7.9 ug/m3 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 m,p-Xylene 740 D 54 7.5 ug/m3 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 Xylene,o- 270 D 22 7.6 ug/m3 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 Styrene 21 U 21 9.1 ug/m3 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 ,; .. Bromoform 51 U 51 22 ug/m3 03/12/1916:47 24.8 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 34 U 34 13 ug/m3 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 4-Ethyltoluene 100 D 24 8.4 ug/m3 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 130 D 24 7.1 ug/m3 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 200 D 24 9.8 ug/m3 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 30 U 30 12 ug/m3 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 30 U 30 9.7 ug/m3 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 Benzyl chloride 26 U 26 15 ug/m3 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 30 U 30 11 ug/m3 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 92 U 92 44 ug/m3 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 Hexachlorobutadiene 53 U 53 22 ug/m3 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 Naphthalene 65 U 65 40 ug/m3 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 Dibromochloromethane 42 U 42 15 ug/m3 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 Tentatively Identified Compound Est.Result Qualifier Unit D RT CAS No. Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Unknown 550 J D ppb vN 4.38 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 Pentane,2-methyl- 670 J N D ppb vitt 6.34 107-83-5 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 Unknown 570 J D ppb v/v 6.75 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 Cyclopentane,methyl- 370 J N D ppb vN 8.27 96-37-7 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 Hexane,2-methyl- 370 J N D ppb v/v 9.32 591-76-4 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 Hexane,3-methyl- 520 J N D ppb v/v 9.65 589-34-4 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 Cyclopentane, 1,2-dimethyl-,cis- 270 J N D ppb v/v 10.30 1192-18-3 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 Cyclohexane,methyl- 690 J N D ppb v/v 11.63 108-87-2 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 Unknown 310 J D ppb vN 12.44 03/12/19 16:47 24.8 Method: EPA 3C - Fixed Gases from Stationary Sources Analyte Result Qualifier RL RL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Methane 0.055 U 0.055 0.055 %v/v 03/06/19 16:25 1.37 TestAmerica Burlington Page 11 of 55 3/15/2019 QC Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47662-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 200-47662-1 Method: TO-15 -Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air Lab Sample ID: 200-47662-1 DU Client Sample ID: SV-3 Matrix: Air Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 140692 Sample Sample DU DU RPD k:,'.-:'. Analyte Result Qualifier Result Qualifier Unit D RPD Limit Propylene 81 77.8 ug/m3 4 25 Dichlorodifluoromethane 9.9 U 9.9 U ug/m3 NC 25 El 1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 5.6 U 5.6 U ug/m3 NC 25 Chloromethane 4.1 U 4.1 U ug/m3 NC 25 Vinyl chloride 2.0 U 2.0 U ug/m3 NC 25 1,3-Butadiene 5.3 5.21 ug/m3 2 25 Bromomethane 3.1 U 3.1 U ug/m3 NC 25 Chloroethane 5.3 U 5.3 U ug/m3 NC 25 Trichlorofluoromethane 4.5 U 4.5 U ug/m3 NC 25 Ethanol 42 40.6 ug/m3 4 25 Freon TF 6.1 U 6.1 U ug/m3 NC 25 1,1-Dichloroethene 3.2 U 3.2 U ug/m3 NC 25 Acetone 49 47.2 J ug/m3 4 25 Isopropyl alcohol 35 J 34.0 J ug/m3 3 25 Carbon disulfide 6.2 U 6.2 U ug/m3 .: , NC 25 Methylene Chloride 6.9 U 6.9 U ug/m3 NC 25 Methyl tert-butyl ether 2.9 U 2.9 U ug/m3 NC 25 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 3.2 U 3.2 U ug/m3 NC 25 n-Hexane 160 150 ug/m3 3 25 1,1-Dichloroethane 3.2 U 3.2 U ug/m3 NC 25 Vinyl acetate 70 U 70 U ug/m3 NC 25 Ethyl acetate 21 J 20.5 J ug/m3 2 25 Methyl Ethyl Ketone 16 15.0 ug/m3 5 25 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 3.2 U 3.2 U ug/m3 NC 25 Chloroform 3.9 U 3.9 U ug/m3 NC 25 Tetrahydrofuran 59 U 59 U ug/m3 NC 25 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 4.4 U 4.4 U ug/m3 NC 25 Cyclohexane 86 83.4 ug/m3 3 25 Carbon tetrachloride 5.0 U 5.0 U ug/m3 NC 25 Benzene 53 51.5 ug/m3 3 25 1,2-Dichloroethane 3.2 U 3.2 U ug/m3 NC 25 n-Heptane 91 87.1 ug/m3 5 25 Trichloroethene 4.3 U 4.3 U ug/m3 NC 25 1,2-Dichloropropane 3.7 U 3.7 U ug/m3 NC 25 Bromodichloromethane 5.4 U 5.4 U ug/m3 NC 25 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 3.6 U 3.6 U ug/m3 NC 25 Methyl isobutyl ketone 8.2 U 8.2 U ug/m3 NC 25 Toluene 77 75.2 ug/m3 2 25 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 3.6 U 3.6 U ug/m3 NC 25 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 4.4 U 4.4 U ug/m3 NC 25 Tetrachloroethene 5.4 U 5.4 U ug/m3 NC 25 Methyl Butyl Ketone 8.2 U 8.2 U ug/m3 NC 25 (2-Hexanone) 1,2-Dibromoethane 6.1 U 6.1 U ug/m3 NC 25 Chlorobenzene 3.7 U 3.7 U ug/m3 NC 25 Ethylbenzene 14 13.8 ug/m3 0.06 25 m,p-Xylene 50 48.9 ug/m3 3 25 Xylene,o- 19 18.6 ug/m3 3 25 TestAmerica Burlington Page 12 of 55 3/15/2019 QC Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47662-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG 200-47662-1 Method: TO-15 -Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air(Continued) Lab Sample ID: 200-47662-1 DU Client Sample ID: SV-3 Matrix: Air Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 140692 Sample Sample DU DU RPD ' Analyte Result Qualifier Result Qualifier Unit D RPD Limit Styrene 3.4 U 3.4 U ug/m3 NC 25 Bromoform 8.3 U 8.3 U ug/m3 NC 25 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 5.5 U 5.5 U ug/m3 NC 25 El 4-Ethyltoluene 5.3 6.13 ug/m3 15 25 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 7.9 7.56 ug/m3 4 25 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 13 12.7 ug/m3 3 25 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 4.8 U 4.8 U ug/m3 NC 25 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 4.8 U 4.8 U ug/m3 NC 25 Benzyl chloride 4.1 U 4.1 U ug/m3 NC 25 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 4.8 U 4.8 U ug/m3 NC 25 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 15 U 15 U ug/m3 NC 25 Hexachlorobutadiene 8.5 U 8.5 U ug/m3 NC 25 Naphthalene 10 U* 10 U* ug/m3 NC 25 Dibromochloromethane 6.8 U 6.8 U ug/m3 NC 25 Lab Sample ID: MB 200-140742/5 Client Sample ID: Method Blank Matrix: Air Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 140742 MB MB Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Propylene 8.6 U 8.6 5.5 ug/m3 03/12/19 13:24 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane 2.5 U 2.5 0.99 ug/m3 03/12/19 13:24 1 1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 1.4 U 1.4 0.48 ug/m3 03/12/19 13:24 1 Chloromethane 1.0 U 1.0 0.52 ug/m3 03/12/19 13:24 1 Vinyl chloride 0.51 U 0.51 0.10 ug/m3 03/12/19 13:24 1 1,3-Butadiene 0.44 U 0.44 0.14 ug/m3 03/12/19 13:24 1 Bromomethane 0.78 U 0.78 0.24 ug/m3 03/12/19 13:24 1 Chloroethane 1.3 U 1.3 0.55 ug/m3 03/12/19 13:24 1 Trichlorofluoromethane 1.1 U 1.1 0.35 ug/m3 03/12/19 13:24 1 Ethanol 9.4 U 9.4 2.3 ug/m3 03/12/19 13:24 1 Freon TF 1.5 U 1.5 0.24 ug/m3 03/12/19 13:24 1 1,1-Dichloroethene 0.79 U 0.79 0.13 ug/m3 03/12/19 13:24 1 Acetone 12 U 12 6.2 ug/m3 03/12/19 13:24 1 Isopropyl alcohol 12 U 12 4.4 ug/m3 03/12/19 13:24 1 Carbon disulfide 1.6 U 1.6 0.37 ug/m3 03/12/19 13:24 1 Methylene Chloride 1.7 U 1.7 0.69 ug/m3 03/12/19 13:24 1 Methyl tert-butyl ether 0.72 U 0.72 0.22 ug/m3 03/12/19 13:24 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.79 U 0.79 0.29 ug/m3 03/12/19 13:24 1 n-Hexane 0.70 U 0.70 0.56 ug/m3 03/12/19 13:24 1 1,1-Dichloroethane 0.81 U 0.81 0.11 ug/m3 03/12/19 13:24 1 Vinyl acetate 18 U 18 8.1 ug/m3 03/12/19 13:24 1 Ethyl acetate 18 U 18 4.0 ug/m3 03/12/19 13:24 1 Methyl Ethyl Ketone 1.5 U 1.5 0.59 ug/m3 03/12/19 13:24 1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.79 U 0.79 0.15 ug/m3 03/12/19 13:24 1 Chloroform 0.98 U 0.98 0.25 ug/m3 03/12/19 13:24 1 Tetrahydrofuran 15 U 15 7.7 ug/m3 03/12/19 13:24 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 1.1 U 1.1 0.37 ug/m3 03/12/19 13:24 1 Cyclohexane 0.69 U 0.69 0.22 ug/m3 03/12/19 13:24 1 TestAmerica Burlington Page 13 of 55 3/15/2019 QC Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47662-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 200-47662-1 Method: TO-15 -Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air (Continued) Lab Sample ID: MB 200-140742/5 Client Sample ID: Method Blank Matrix:Air Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 140742 MB MB Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Oil Fac Carbon tetrachloride 1.3 U 1.3 0.15 ug/m3 03/12/19 13:24 1 Benzene 0.64 U 0.64 0.23 ug/m3 03/12/19 13:24 1 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.81 U 0.81 0.25 ug/m3 03/12/19 13:24 1 El n-Heptane 0.82 U 0.82 0.57 ug/m3 03/12/19 13:24 1 Trichloroethene 1.1 U 1.1 0.16 ug/m3 03/12/19 13:24 1 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.92 U 0.92 0.55 ug/m3 03/12/19 13:24 1 Bromodichloromethane 1.3 U 1.3 0.63 ug/m3 03/12/19 13:24 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.91 U 0.91 0.44 ug/m3 03/12/19 13:24 1 Methyl isobutyl ketone 2.0 U 2.0 1.5 ug/m3 03/12/19 13:24 1 Toluene 0.75 U 0.75 0.26 ug/m3 03/12/19 13:24 1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.91 U 0.91 0.54 ug/m3 03/12/19 13:24 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 1.1 U 1.1 0.43 ug/m3 03/12/19 13:24 1 Tetrachloroethene 1.4 U 1.4 0.20 ug/m3 03/12/19 13:24 1 Methyl Butyl Ketone(2-Hexanone) 2.0 U 2.0 1.7 ug/m3 03/12/19 13:24 1 1,2-Dibromoethane 1.5 U 1.5 0.53 ug/m3 03/12/19 13:24 1 Chlorobenzene 0.92 U 0.92 0.18 ug/m3 03/12/1913:24 1 Ethylbenzene 0.87 U 0.87 0.32 ug/m3 03/12/1913:24 1 m,p-Xylene 2.2 U 2.2 0.30 ug/m3 03/12/19 13:24 1 Xylene,o- 0.87 U 0.87 0.31 ug/m3 03/12/19 13:24 1 Styrene 0.85 U 0.85 0.37 ug/m3 03/12/19 13:24 1 Bromoform 2.1 U 2.1 0.89 ug/m3 03/12/1913:24 1 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1.4 U 1.4 0.52 ug/m3 03/12/19 13:24 1 4-Ethyltoluene 0.98 U 0.98 0.34 ug/m3 03/12/1913:24 1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.98 U 0.98 0.29 ug/m3 03/12/19 13:24 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.98 U 0.98 0.39 ug/m3 03/12/19 13:24 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 1.2 U 1.2 0.49 ug/m3 03/12/19 13:24 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.398 J 1.2 0.39 ug/m3 03/12/19 13:24 1 Benzyl chloride 1.0 U 1.0 0.62 ug/m3 03/12/19 13:24 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.460 J 1.2 0.43 ug/m3 03/12/19 13:24 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 3.7 U 3.7 1.8 ug/m3 03/12/19 13:24 1 Hexachlorobutadiene 1.16 J 2.1 0.87 ug/m3 03/12/19 13:24 1 Naphthalene 2.6 U 2.6 1.6 ug/m3 03/12/19 13:24 1 Dibromochloromethane 1.7 U 1.7 0.60 ug/m3 03/12/19 13:24 1 MB MB Tentatively Identified Compound Est.Result Qualifier Unit D RT CAS No. Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 1.64 J ug/m3 25.13 87-61-6 03/12/19 13:24 1 Tentatively Identified Compound None ppb v/v 03/12/19 13:24 1 Lab Sample ID: LCS 200-140742/4 Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix: Air Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 140742 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Propylene 17.2 16.3 ug/m3 95 58-129 Dichlorodifluoromethane 49.4 40.9 ug/m3 83 68.128 1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 69.9 58.1 ug/m3 83 78-138 Chloromethane 20.6 21.2 ug/m3 103 57-126 Vinyl chloride 25.6 29.1 ug/m3 114 62-125 TestAmerica Burlington Page 14 of 55 3/15/2019 QC Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47662-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 200-47662-1 Method: TO-15 -Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air (Continued) Lab Sample ID: LCS 200-140742/4 Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix: Air Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 140742 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits 1,3-Butadiene 22.1 25.8 ug/m3 116 59-125 Bromomethane 38.8 41.0 ug/m3 106 68-128 Chloroethane 26.4 30.2 ug/m3 114 65-125Ell Trichlorofluoromethane 56.2 50.9 ug/m3 91 67-127 Ethanol 28.3 34.4 ug/m3 122 28-168 Freon TF 76.6 71.1 ug/m3 93 68-128 1,1-Dichloroethene 39.6 38.0 ug/m3 96 67-127 Acetone 23.7 26.2 ug/m3 110 64-136 Isopropyl alcohol 24.6 29.0 ug/m3 118 55.124 Carbon disulfide 31.1 34.3 ug/m3 110 81-141 Methylene Chloride 34.7 38.1 ug/m3 110 62-122 Methyl tert-butyl ether 36.0 34.2 ug/m3 95 67-127 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 39.6 41.2 ug/m3 104 72-132 n-Hexane 35.2 37.8 ug/m3 107 71-131 1,1-Dichloroethane 40.5 42.5 ug/m3 105 66-126 Vinyl acetate 35.2 38.0 ug/m3 108 62-130 Ethyl acetate 36.0 38.1 ug/m3 106 75-135 Methyl Ethyl Ketone 29.5 27.1 ug/m3 92 62-122 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 39.6 41.0 ug/m3 103 67-127 Chloroform 48.8 46.7 ug/m3 96 69-129 Tetrahydrofuran 29.5 29.5 ug/m3 100 61-136 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 54.6 44.2 ug/m3 81 70-130 Cyclohexane 34.4 31.8 ug/m3 92 69-129 Carbon tetrachloride 62.9 51.7 ug/m3 82 62-143 Benzene 31.9 31.3 ug/m3 98 67-127 1,2-Dichloroethane 40.5 33.6 ug/m3 83 67-132 n-Heptane 41.0 42.6 ug/m3 104 62_130 Trichloroethene 53.7 46.4 ug/m3 86 68-128 1,2-Dichloropropane 46.2 39.6 ug/m3 86 67-127 Bromodichloromethane 67.0 61.0 ug/m3 91 69-129 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 45.4 39.4 ug/m3 87 70-130 Methyl isobutyl ketone 41.0 42.9 ug/m3 105 62-130 Toluene 37.7 33.3 ug/m3 88 67-127 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 45.4 36.3 ug/m3 80 69-129 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 54.6 60.9 ug/m3 112 69-129 Tetrachloroethene 67.8 62.7 ug/m3 92 70-130 Methyl Butyl Ketone 41.0 55.2 * ug/m3 135 61-127 (2-Hexanone) 1,2-Dibromoethane 76.8 69.3 ug/m3 90 70-130 Chlorobenzene 46.0 40.4 ug/m3 88 68-128 Ethylbenzene 43.4 39.3 ug/m3 91 68-128 m,p-Xylene 86.8 77.5 ug/m3 89 68-128 Xylene,o- 43.4 36.3 ug/m3 84 67-127 Styrene 42.6 37.9 ug/m3 89 68-128 Bromoform 103 96.4 ug/m3 93 34-170 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 68.6 78.3 ug/m3 114 69-129 4-Ethyltoluene 49.2 45.7 ug/m3 93 69-129 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 49.2 45.7 ug/m3 93 65-125 TestAmerica Burlington Page 15 of 55 3/15/2019 QC Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47662-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 200-47662-1 Method: TO-15 - Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air (Continued) Lab Sample ID: LCS 200-140742/4 Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix: Air Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 140742 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 49.2 42.4 ug/m3 86 65-125 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 60.1 48.2 ug/m3 80 67-127 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 60.1 47.4 ug/m3 79 66-126El Benzyl chloride 51.8 43.5 ug/m3 84 54-135 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 60.1 47.0 ug/m3 78 67-127 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 74.2 58.9 ug/m3 79 59-126 Hexachlorobutadiene 107 82.3 ug/m3 77 62-130 Naphthalene 52.4 38.5 ug/m3 73 50-121 I_Dibromochloromethane 85.2 83.9 ug/m3 98 66-130 Method: EPA 3C - Fixed Gases from Stationary Sources Lab Sample ID: MB 200-140840/4 Client Sample ID: Method Blank Matrix: Air Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 140840 MB MB Analyte Result Qualifier RL RL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Methane 0.040 U 0.040 0.040 %v/v 03/06/19 14:27 1 Lab Sample ID: LCS 200-140840/2 Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix: Air Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 140840 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Methane 4.00 3.93 %v/v 98 70-130 TestAmerica Burlington Page 16 of 55 3/15/2019 QC Association Summary Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47662-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 200-47662-1 Air - GC/MS VOA Analysis Batch: 140692 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 200-47662-1 SV-3 Total/NA Air TO-15 200-47662-2 SV-15 Total/NA Air TO-15 F 200-47662-1 DU SV-3 Total/NA Air TO-15 Analysis Batch: 140742 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 200-47662-2-DL SV-15 Total/NA Air TO-15 Q MB 200-140742/5 Method Blank Total/NA Air TO-15 v LCS 200-140742/4 Lab Control Sample Total/NA Air TO-15 Air - GC VOA Analysis Batch: 140840 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 200-47662-1 SV-3 Total/NA Air EPA 3C 200-47662-2 SV-15 Total/NA Air EPA 3C MB 200-140840/4 Method Blank Total/NA Air EPA 3C LCS 200-140840/2 Lab Control Sample Total/NA Air EPA 3C TestAmerica Burlington Page 17 of 55 3/15/2019 Lab Chronicle Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47662-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 200-47662-1 Client Sample ID: SV-3 Lab Sample ID: 200-47662-1 Date Collected: 03/01/19 08:56 Matrix: Air Date Received: 03/05/19 10:02 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis TO-15 4 140692 03/12/19 04:54 Al B TAL BUR Total/NA Analysis EPA 3C 1.48 140840 03/06/19 15:37 WRD TAL BUR Client Sample ID: SV-15 Lab Sample ID: 200-47662-2 Date Collected: 03/01/19 09:28 Matrix: Air Date Received: 03/05/19 10:02 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis TO-15 3.01 140692 03/12/19 06:39 A1B TAL BUR Total/NA Analysis TO-15 DL 24.8 140742 03/12/19 16:47 K1P TAL BUR Total/NA Analysis EPA 3C 1.37 140840 03/06/19 16:25 WRD TAL BUR Laboratory References: TAL BUR=TestAmerica Burlington,30 Community Drive,Suite 11,South Burlington,VT 05403,TEL(802)660-1990 TestAmerica Burlington Page 18 of 55 3/15/2019 Accreditation/Certification Summary Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47662-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 200-47662-1 Laboratory: TestAmerica Burlington Unless otherwise noted,all analytes for this laboratory were covered under each accreditation/certification below. Authority Program EPA Region Identification Number Expiration Date Minnesota NELAP 5 050-999-436 12-31-19 The following analytes are included in this report,but the laboratory is not certified by the governing authority. This list may include analytes for which the agency does not offer certification. Analysis Method Prep Method Matrix Analyte TO-15 Air Vinyl acetate 10 TestAmerica Burlington Page 19 of 55 3/15/2019 Method Summary Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47662-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG. 200-47662-1 Method Method Description Protocol Laboratory TO-15 Volatile Organic Compounds in Ambient Air EPA TAL BUR EPA 3C Fixed Gases from Stationary Sources EPA TAL BUR Protocol References: i.i", s. EPA=US Environmental Protection Agency Laboratory References: TAL BUR=TestAmerica Burlington,30 Community Drive,Suite 11,South Burlington,VT 05403,TEL(802)660-1990 TestAmerica Burlington Page 20 of 55 3/15/2019 Sample Summary Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 200-47662-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows SDG: 200-47662-1 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Matrix Collected Received 200-47662-1 SV-3 Air 03/01/19 08:56 03/05/19 10:02 200-47662-2 SV-15 Air 03/01/19 09:28 03/05/19 10:02 TestAmerica Burlington Page 21 of 55 3/15/2019 t Post-Sampling Air Canister Pressure Check Record Login# Date Time Lab BP Lab Temp ressure (w/Location Code) - (Military) ("Hg) C ( ) ;Gauge ID .-. ;:: ,: 200-47662 03/05/19 11:19 29.9 21 G17 RM Sampling Information and Return Equipment Check Yes N o Comments v< (1)Is a Field Test Data Sheet(FTDS)or similar sampling documentation present? X :: (2)Is the flow controller ID used for each canister recorded? X (3)MA MCP&NJ DKQP:Check return flow rate for flow controllers X (4)Is visible sign of damage to canister and/or flow controller(FC)present? X If damage observed,list equipment IDs and describe condition: Post-Sampling Return Pressure Check .,; Lab ID ° Canister ID Pressure' Anomaly2 FC FC Check4 FC Return Can Cert Comments ("Hg) (Y/N) ID3 Reference (Y/N) Batch ID 200-47662-A-1 5935 -3.0 N 6036 81/197 Y 6294-139863 200-47662-A-2 4658 0.0 N 4592 81/197 Y 6359-34110 al 1 Criteria: Return Pressure should be between-1 and-10("Hg)with the exception of grab samples or those using 100 or 200mUminute flow controllers. These samples must be returned at no lower than-10"Hg,but have no specific criteria otherwise. 2 If return pressure is not within criteria,initiate Non-Conformance Memo. 3 Record the ID of the FC used for sampling if information is provided,otherwise leave blank. 4 Record the Flow Controller Set Flow Rate Logbook ID and Page number in which the original FC Check was recorded FSR021:05.10.16:1 TestAmerica Burlington Page 22 of 55 3/15/2019 Su M ta\ cL 1O I TestAmerica Minneapolis SC TestAmerica Burlington 213 Canister Samples Chain of Custody Record TestAmerica 30 Community Drive Suite 11 TestAmerica Laboratories,Inc.assn s no liabili with respect to the collection and shipment of these samples. THE LEADER IN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING South Burlington,VT 05403-6809 phone 802.660.1990 fax 802.660.1919 IJn�VI r 1jJ Q 4Os —ve-tcx .0 r,yTestAmerica Laboratories,Inc. Client Contact Info aat}\�n Client Project Manager: Lx 1,��v`` Samples Collected By: c. y �� "` ' } CO No: Company Name: W xeone: It 6,7,3z-y?' of I COCs Address: 1,In D\.�€ Y GY''e2,;‘(C ' Email: ��,b%•:,tf :ii 3Cb"- o — City/State/Zip `'Q.. �1'-;,`I, N Co4A� e�( t j wRYX-L,J e"I'l m s For Lab Use Only: Phone: ')I� \ .O�7S Site Contact C6 Y �. a 2 Walk-in Client: FAX tiA Tel/Fax .( C W Lab Sampling: Project Name: E 15 A 0. ar. Anaylsis TurnaroundA,Time o = N Site/Location: ^CO b /�. Standard(Specific): ) E < g ` Job/SDG No.: — P0# S pi-+QUl7 Rush(Specifiy): . nd A (See below for Add'I Items)c w .ai a0. Canister Canister y m co m :41, ¢ w A : Sample Time Vacuum in Vacuum in nlow Canister v `- d I✓''�_ o Sample Identification Tlme Start Controller w v N o ,.:2-7 sw,�" ¢ N 0 a . __ Date(s) Stop Field,'Hg Field,'Hg ID r m M r �.a+ $ j (Start)' (Stop)' ID O O a a y n<. L ro., v° .6 _ _ v `m I- r w LU < w 0 N, 5 inn in in o Sample Specific Notes: -2-q3.s 1152. 5935 — X ___________ -�\S Zz 9z -t ( , r5� )s - X X ---- a) S �I CO CD ry c_a L L IVA C3--) 3 // // .? _ 01 A 200-47662 Chain of Custody . v • Temperature(Fahrenheit) I - Start Interior Ambient Stop Pressure(inches of Hg) Start Interior Ambient S /_ Special Instructions/QCRequireme Comm . , e IQO sseAv ` n ,,6,1_ c_cor.\/ Ay‘et 's;_. Samples Shipped by: // Date/Time:3/L. //7 Sa 1:1- Received b I 90 T ko` .-�_ (� 170 ���! C� 3/54 10:03., �.� Samples Relinquished by: ^,� Da /Time:l_ Rena r: Relinquished by: Date/Time: Received by: Lab.Use Only.;ir Shipper Name = Opened by Condition , 01. : Form No.CA-C-WI-003,Rev.2.5,dated 9/22/2017 IV O CO - - I % ORIGIN ID:GPZA (111) 1/1-111} SHIP DATE: 04IARI9 SAMPLE RECEIVING ACTWGT: 9.60B TESTAMERICA CAD: 39892QySAFES211 7600 WEST 27TH STREET SUITE 209 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55426 BILL RECIPIE+ UNITED STATES US V TO SAMPLE RECEIVING TESTAMERICA BURLINGTON 5 30 COMMUNITY DRIVE -7- 2 BURLINGTON VT 05403 (• giV) —1990 REF: PO: DEPT: III 1111111 1111111 11 1111111111 111 11 III MI 11 111 1 1 III 1 MI 1 111111 III , FedEx „ Express ' 4)1.1 d t r, 11114: 1111) 14 TUE — 05 MAR 10:30A ITorti 4114 9905 7839 PRIORITY OVERNIGHT NC 05403 vr-us BTI! Page 24 of 55 3/15/2019 Login Sample Receipt Checklist Client:Wenck Associates, Inc Job Number: 200-47662-1 SDG Number: 200-47662-1 Login Number: 47662 List Source:TestAmerica Burlington List Number: 1 `" Creator: McNabb, Robert W Question Answer Comment Radioactivity wasn't checked or is<1=background as measured by a survey N/A Lab does not accept radioactive samples. meter. The cooler's custody seal, if present, is intact. True 173831 Sample custody seals, if present, are intact. True The cooler or samples do not appear to have been compromised or True tampered with. Samples were received on ice. N/A Thermal preservation not required. Cooler Temperature is acceptable. True Cooler Temperature is recorded. N/A Thermal preservation not required. COC is present. True COC is filled out in ink and legible. True COC is filled out with all pertinent information. True Is the Field Sampler's name present on COC? True CA There are no discrepancies between the containers received and the COC. True Samples are received within Holding Time(excluding tests with immediate True HTs) Sample containers have legible labels. True NMI Containers are not broken or leaking. True Sample collection date/times are provided. True Appropriate sample containers are used. True Sample bottles are completely filled. N/A Sample Preservation Verified. True There is sufficient vol. for all requested analyses, incl. any requested True MS/MSDs Containers requiring zero headspace have no headspace or bubble is True <6mm(1/4"). Multiphasic samples are not present. True Samples do not require splitting or compositing. True Residual Chlorine Checked. N/A TestAmerica Burlington Page 25 of 55 3/15/2019 1 11 1111111111 1111111 111111111111 Loc: 200 200-46948-A-10 46948I- 6359 #10 Location:Air-Storage I Bottle:Summa Canister 1L A Sampled.1/8/2019 12:00 AM 200-1247464 H I: d C � y '> 0 ~ II III ■ 0. �' c -,4 1111111111111111.111 a ,t ,,,,...,1 0 . iiiiiiiiiii 1 -„, --.,6 ,I) h' "7"--- m c 0(6 .:°73 ro � 11u111� r. _ ro N C Ili11111111511NWa 0) Nw❑ ui. J :n2!) O• N • • • N • • • • • • 73•gi" S`) 2 O 11111 N N O II X o , ,,, N d 4- I-CV 4 11111 It O C C NCø1U' hhhhh' o 0)E CSSy2 a E E a a tl ad U :;��` f�G - �0 d y I c fu,,. 111111 r m c H H Q d a' ❑ NJ 11, rn E C U \ ... 0 °- U U w c 0) U ., _. In V.. co co co U 0). 7 N N co N N a d Q Q E ro U 0 C9 C9 0 m 0 U ct- 0 > L CO A L. C C -. U (U a ❑ -O U 0 > O L ! C c0 6.- LI- C..) 2.3'. a as as to _ m a sEi - c 2 o (JJ N (j y o ry 0 _C ! c E 0) o o _ U a In U7 r) C U C O N O —� (� @ t v O O O d dl y a� v C H H H a U (� a� ❑ \>� ♦ ♦ Q 0 :DEQ .ti. v � 0 0 0 a w L (n ` (9 a' (0 L -o T .0 T N J (� -0 CO p ro J C I 'C = •C O c a) A:..ro C N N U U ) T U C Ti .OY 7 O m C U N L.E e D. 9 ♦ , w Q © ya d E F- L 8 E »_ l Ill c m m 0 ❑ p O 13 v ro ca g,,1,, Q Q '5 -6 NIEul - b b o mO _cc = c . cCl- O E z uu_ C O C 0 - N c0 J 0) O CO O 'V' ❑ t` V O V � c0 r` W 2 (0 O V .0 a- 3 > > > d N 'N C N of W O) of cD 0) cD V' C) 0) N II 0) 'O ❑ a) N N a/ Z 8 �> E ") ro V V ] M V D c0 u7 C N E O O J J J J 0 0 Si c U n L > E d V et 0 0 0 o F- O o m c C c O. 0 (N CO v 10 c0 N- 50 rn (0 E > > a a CL m w C C C C ❑ Page 26 of 55 3/15/2019 l Pre-Shipment Clean Canister Certification Report Canister Cleaning&Pre-Shipment Leak Test System ID Max DF# #Cycles Cleaning Start Date/Time System Start Temp(s): Technician Can Size Certification Type: Oven 1/2 1 100 2/7/2019 1503 21 21 EJE 1 liter batch Initial' Final Final Initial Reading Final Reading Port Can ID (psia) (psia) Diff.3 ("Hg) Gauge: Date: Time: Tiech: Temp: Gauge: Dte: Time:- Tech: Temp: 1 6278 r,.0"--1 c "� / F � ....-25.<" 026 c-'1� C:t v e - G26 ?:',-)61.2."_'.1e: �- t( 2 6296 \(] ;.05 r G26 - G26 ( \ 3 3809 1 „. (C, , c' G26 G26 4 6358 , 1 r t4aG' G26 G26 5 6347 ; 0 , J€' G26 (\ G26 6 5493 •06"/ i(2"D G26 I G26 7 3817 ,`� l - 0G26 026 8 6360 , 17 `I ra 4- G26 G26 9 6351 J 4. .. cS�F✓ G26 G26 I I • 10 5935 r ® G26 G26 11 5873 - _ r' .r cir'7 ✓ G26 G26 0--- 12 6294 . 0L x ()L( cr 2G r'? G26 Z;1,5":1 7 too ty f C G26 Zit 4hi i5- 5---- z.1, Ca 1 Batch Certification:The reading is taken on the"batch"canister and this value is used as the initial pressure for all canisters in the batch. 3 Difference=Final Pressure-Initial Pressure. Acceptance Criteria: (1)The difference must be less than or equal to+0.25psi. (2)Pressure readings must be at least 24 hours apart. l f time frame was noxi et, the PM must authorize shipment of canister PM Authorization Date: Clean Canister Certification Analysis&Authorization of Release to Inventory Test Method: 2TO15 Routine ❑TO15 LL Inventory Level Secondary Review -a Can ID L Date Sequence Analyst 1 2 3 4 Limited Review Date Reviewer 6294 �t�/2 /q 'I 3 -- xxxx L./i Z0 1 N m r rn N <,-.,k1 moo 2p ,_ aD W oNwN, co = D . $; N __ 0 e Inventory Level 1: Individual Canister Certification(TO15LL 0.01). Comments: Inventory Level 2: Individual or Batch Certification(TO15 0.04 ppbv). Inventory Level 3: Individual or Batch Certification(7015 0.2 ppbv). r Inventory Level Limited: Canisters may only be used for certain projects. H2O - V a v Dup Tees/Vac gauges(enter IDs if included): N w o o cn CO N o Form ID:FAI023:12 m Revision Date:12/18/2018 TestAmerica Burlington — — FORM I AIR - GC/MS VOA ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: TestAmerica Burlington Job No. : 200-46948-1 SDG No. : Client Sample ID: 6359 Lab Sample ID: 200-46948-10 Matrix: Air Lab File ID: 34110-22.D Analysis Method: TO-15 Date Collected: 01/08/2019 00:00 Sample wt/vol: 200 (mL) Date Analyzed: 01/13/2019 03:30 Soil Aliquot Vol: Dilution Factor: 1 Soil Extract Vol. : GC Column: RTX-624 ID: 0.32 (mm) % Moisture: Level: (low/med) Low Analysis Batch No. : 139038 Units: ppb v/v CAS NO. COMPOUND NAME RESULT Q RL RL 115-07-1 Propylene 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 75-71-8 Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-45-6 Freon 22 0.50 U 0.50 0.50s 76-14-2 1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 i,i° 74-87-3 Chloromethane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 106-97-8 n-Butane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-01-4 Vinyl chloride 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 0 106-99-0 1,3-Butadiene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 74-83-9 Bromomethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-00-3 Chloroethane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 16 593-60-2 Bromoethene(Vinyl Bromide) 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-69-4 Trichlorofluoromethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 64-17-5 Ethanol 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 76-13-1 Freon TF 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-35-4 1,1-Dichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 67-64-1 Acetone 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 67-63-0 Isopropyl alcohol 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 75-15-0 Carbon disulfide 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 107-05-1 3-Chloropropene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-09-2 Methylene Chloride 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-65-0 tert-Butyl alcohol 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 1634-04-4 Methyl tert-butyl ether 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 156-60-5 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 110-54-3 n-Hexane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-34-3 1,1-Dichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-05-4 Vinyl acetate 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 141-78-6 Ethyl acetate 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 78-93-3 Methyl Ethyl Ketone 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 156-59-2 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 540-59-0 1,2-Dichloroethene, Total 0.40 U 0.40 0.40 67-66-3 Chloroform 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 109-99-9 Tetrahydrofuran 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 71-55-6 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 110-82-7 Cyclohexane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 56-23-5 Carbon tetrachloride 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 540-84-1 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 FORM I TO-15 Page 28 of 55 3/15/2019 FORM I AIR - GC/MS VOA ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: TestAmerica Burlington Job No. : 200-46948-1 SDG No. : Client Sample ID: 6359 Lab Sample ID: 200-46948-10 Matrix: Air Lab File ID: 34110-22.D Analysis Method: TO-15 Date Collected: 01/08/2019 00:00 Sample wt/vol: 200 (mL) Date Analyzed: 01/13/2019 03:30 Soil Aliquot Vol: Dilution Factor: 1 Soil Extract Vol. : GC Column: RTX-624 ID: 0.32 (mm) 96 Moisture: Level: (low/med) Low Analysis Batch No. : 139038 Units: ppb v/v CAS NO. COMPOUND NAME RESULT Q RL RL 71-43-2 Benzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 107-06-2 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 142-82-5 n-Heptane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 _,-':,; 79-01-6 Trichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 ' r- 80-62-6 Methyl methacrylate 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 78-87-5 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 123-91-1 1,4-Dioxane 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 75-27-4 Bromodichloromethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 10061-01-5 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-10-1 methyl isobutyl ketone 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 16 108-88-3 Toluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 10061-02-6 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 79-00-5 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 127-18-4 Tetrachloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 591-78-6 Methyl Butyl Ketone (2-Hexanone) 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 124-48-1 Dibromochloromethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 106-93-4 1,2-Dibromoethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-90-7 Chlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 100-41-4 Ethylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 179601-23-1 m,p-Xylene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 95-47-6 Xylene, o- 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 1330-20-7 Xylene (total) 0.70 U 0.70 0.70 100-42-5 Styrene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-25-2 Bromoform 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 98-82-8 Cumene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 79-34-5 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 103-65-1 n-Propylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 622-96-8 4-Ethyltoluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-67-8 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 95-49-8 2-Chlorotoluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 98-06-6 tert-Butylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 95-63-6 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 135-98-8 sec-Butylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 99-87-6 4-Isopropyltoluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 541-73-1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 106-46-7 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 FORM I TO-15 Page 29 of 55 3/15/2019 FORM I AIR - GC/MS VOA ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: TestAmerica Burlington Job No. : 200-46948-1 SDG No. : Client Sample ID: 6359 Lab Sample ID: 200-46948-10 `; Matrix: Air Lab File ID: 34110-22.D Analysis Method: TO-15 Date Collected: 01/08/2019 00:00 Sample wt/vol: 200 (mL) Date Analyzed: 01/13/2019 03:30 Soil Aliquot Vol: Dilution Factor: 1 Soil Extract Vol. : GC Column: RTX-624 ID: 0.32 (mm) % Moisture: Level: (low/med) Low Analysis Batch No. : 139038 Units: ppb v/v CAS NO. COMPOUND NAME RESULT Q RL RL 100-44-7 Benzyl chloride 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 104-51-8 n-Butylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 95-50-1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 120-82-1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 . 'V' 87-68-3 Hexachlorobutadiene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 91-20-3 Naphthalene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 • 16 FORM I TO-15 Page 30 of 55 3/15/2019 Report Date: 14-Jan-2019 08:35:28 Chrom Revision: 2.3 13-Dec-2018 17:23:12 TestAmerica Burlington Target Compound Quantitation Report Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190112-34110.b\34110-22.D Lims ID: 200-46948-A-10 Client ID: 6359 Sample Type: Client Inject. Date: 13-Jan-2019 03:30:30 ALS Bottle#: 21 Worklist Smp#: 23 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Sample Info: 200-0034110-023 Misc. Info.: 46911-12 Operator ID: ggg Instrument ID: CHB.i Method: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190112-34110.b\TO15_LLNJTO3.m Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Last Update: 14-Jan-2019 08:35:28 Calib Date: 10-Jan-2019 13:03:30 Integrator: RTE ID Type: Deconvolution ID Quant Method: Internal/External Standard Quant By: Initial Calibration Last ICal File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190109-34081.b\34081-16.D Column 1 : RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Det: MS SCAN Process Host: CTX1019 First Level Reviewer: desjardinsb Date: 14-Jan-2019 08:35:28 RT Adj RT Dlt RT OnCol Amt Compound Sig (min.) (min.) (min.) Q Response ppb v/v Flags 1 Propene 41 3.135 ND 2 Dichlorodifluoromethane 85 3.193 ND 3 Chlorodifluoromethane 51 3.225 ND 4 1,2-Dichloro-1,1,2,2-tetra 85 3.412 ND 5 Chloromethane 50 3.535 ND 16 6 Butane 43 3.706 ND 7 Vinyl chloride 62 3.743 ND 8 Butadiene 54 3.807 ND 10 Bromomethane 94 4.464 ND 11 Chloroethane 64 4.693 ND 13 Vinyl bromide 106 5.099 ND 14 Trichlorofluoromethane 101 5.200 ND 16 Ethanol 45 5.654 ND 19 1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trif 101 6.225 ND 20 1,1-Dichloroethene 96 6.289 ND 21 Acetone 43 6.438 ND 22 Isopropyl alcohol 45 6.657 ND 23 Carbon disulfide 76 6.721 ND 24 3-Chloro-1-propene 41 6.988 ND 27 Methylene Chloride 49 7.244 ND 28 2-Methyl-2-propanol 59 7.356 ND 29 Methyl tert-butyl ether 73 7.596 ND 30 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 61 7.655 ND 32 Hexane 57 7.991 7.981 0.005 90 11351 0.1426 33 1,1-Dichloroethane 63 8.392 ND 34 Vinyl acetate 43 8.397 ND 36 2-Butanone (MEK) 72 9.277 ND 37 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 96 9.293 ND 35 Ethyl acetate 88 9.299 ND * 39 Chlorobromomethane 128 9.656 9.662 -0.006 79 431322 10.0 38 Tetrahydrofuran 42 9.672 ND Page 31 of 55 3/15/2019 Report Date: 14-Jan-2019 08:35:28 Chrom Revision: 2.3 13-Dec-2018 17:23:12 Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\201 901 1 2-341 1 0.b\34110-22.D RT Adj RT Dlt RT OnCol Amt Compound Sig (min.) (min.) (min.) Q Response ppb v/v Flags 40 Chloroform 83 9.736 ND 42 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 97 9.993 ND S 41 1,2-Dichloroethene, Total 61 10.000 ND 43 Cyclohexane 84 10.014 ND 44 Carbon tetrachloride 117 10.201 ND 45 Isooctane 57 10.484 ND 46 Benzene 78 10.521 ND 47 1,2-Dichloroethane 62 10.617 ND 48 n-Heptane 43 10.740 ND * 50 1,4-Difluorobenzene 114 11.060 11.065 -0.005 94 1927801 10.0 53 Trichloroethene 95 11.434 ND 54 1,2-Dichloropropane 63 11.802 ND 55 Methyl methacrylate 69 11.839 ND 56 1,4-Dioxane 88 11.930 ND 57 Dibromomethane 174 11.989 ND 58 Dichlorobromomethane 83 12.159 ND 60 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 75 12.789 ND 61 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK 43 12.933 ND 64 Toluene 92 13.221 ND 66 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 75 13.579 ND 67 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 83 13.851 ND 68 Tetrachloroethene 166 13.995 ND 69 2-Hexanone 43 14.113 ND 70 Chlorodibromomethane 129 14.406 ND 71 Ethylene Dibromide 107 14.609 ND * 72 Chlorobenzene-d5 117 15.175 15.175 -0.001 84 1596109 10.0 16 73 Chlorobenzene 112 15.212 ND 74 Ethylbenzene 91 15.287 15.276 0.006 94 6982 0.0305 76 m-Xylene& p-Xylene 106 15.431 ND 78 o-Xylene 106 15.943 ND 79 Styrene 104 15.965 ND S 77 Xylenes, Total 106 16.000 ND 80 Bromoform 173 16.258 ND 81 Isopropylbenzene 105 16.354 ND 83 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 83 16.760 ND 84 N-Propylbenzene 91 16.840 ND 87 4-Ethyltoluene 105 16.963 ND 88 2-Chlorotoluene 91 17.005 ND 89 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 105 17.027 ND 91 tert-Butylbenzene 119 17.400 ND 92 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 105 17.475 ND 93 sec-Butylbenzene 105 17.662 ND 94 4-lsopropyltoluene 119 17.811 ND 95 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 146 17.891 ND 96 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 146 17.998 ND 97 Benzyl chloride 91 18.147 ND 99 n-Butylbenzene 91 18.318 ND 100 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 146 18.484 ND 103 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 180 20.827 ND 104 Hexachlorobutadiene 225 20.997 ND 105 Naphthalene 128 21.301 ND Page 32 of 55 3/15/2019 Report Date: 14-Jan-2019 08:35:28 Chrom Revision: 2.3 13-Dec-2018 17:23:12 Reagents: ATTO15BISs 00006 Amount Added: 20.00 Units: mL Run Reagent 16 Page 33 of 55 3/15/2019 Report Date:14-Jan-2019 08:35:28 Chrom Revision:2.3 13-Dec-2018 17:23:12 TestAmerica Burlington i:' Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHB.i\20190112-34110.b\34110-22.D Injection Date: 13-Jan-2019 03:30:30 Instrument ID: CHB.i Operator ID: ggg Lims ID: 200-46948-A-10 Lab Sample ID: 200-46948-10 Worklist Smp#: 23 Client ID: 6359 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil.Factor: 1.0000 ALS Bottle#: 21 Method: TO15_LLNJ_TO3 Limit Group: Al_TO15_ICAL Column:RTX-624(0.32 mm) Y Scaling:Method Defined:Scale to the Nth Largest Target:1 2 + 34110-22[MS SCAN Chro]:Total o n 2 0 2 c tit 21 o c C N N c 1« `0 0 o o 1. o U a 1 I 1: of 1 c m 0 0 1. E 0 0 0 1 0 _o X o 1 0 1 U 11 16 11 111IIIW VI 1 ill 11 l 1 II 1111 1.1114.1 II .1 11 II I II III III U I Al•111111111111 III II nlll mlammlll II•111 II M1 IRIS a• I I UI 11101 U 11111 5 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 Min Page 34 of 55 3/15/2019 FORM I AIR - GC/MS VOA ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: TestAmerica Burlington Job No. : 200-47318-1 SDG No. : Client Sample ID: 6294 Lab Sample ID: 200-47318-12 1 Matrix: Air Lab File ID: 34522-24.D Analysis Method: TO-15 Date Collected: 02/07/2019 00:00 Sample wt/vol: 200 (mL) Date Analyzed: 02/12/2019 06:54 Soil Aliquot Vol: Dilution Factor: 1 Soil Extract Vol. : GC Column: RTX-624 ID: 0.32 (mm) % Moisture: Level: (low/med) Low Analysis Batch No. : 139868 Units: ppb v/v CAS NO. COMPOUND NAME RESULT Q RL RL 115-07-1 Propylene 5.0 U ^ 5.0 5.0 75-71-8 Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-45-6 Freon 22 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 'F 76-14-2 1,2-Dichlorotetrafluoroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 3 74-87-3 Chloromethane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 106-97-8 n-Butane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-01-4 Vinyl chloride 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 106-99-0 1,3-Butadiene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 74-83-9 Bromomethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-00-3 Chloroethane 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 16 593-60-2 Bromoethene(Vinyl Bromide) 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-69-4 Trichlorofluoromethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 64-17-5 Ethanol 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 76-13-1 Freon TF 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-35-4 1,1-Dichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 67-64-1 Acetone 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 67-63-0 Isopropyl alcohol 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 75-15-0 Carbon disulfide 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 107-05-1 3-Chloropropene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-09-2 Methylene Chloride 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 75-65-0 tert-Butyl alcohol 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 1634-04-4 Methyl tert-butyl ether 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 156-60-5 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 110-54-3 n-Hexane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-34-3 1,1-Dichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-05-4 Vinyl acetate 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 141-78-6 Ethyl acetate 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 78-93-3 Methyl Ethyl Ketone 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 156-59-2 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 540-59-0 1,2-Dichloroethene, Total 0.40 U 0.40 0.40 67-66-3 Chloroform 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 109-99-9 Tetrahydrofuran 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 71-55-6 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 110-82-7 Cyclohexane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 56-23-5 Carbon tetrachloride 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 540-84-1 2,2,4-Trimethylpentane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 FORM I TO-15 Page 35 of 55 3/15/2019 FORM I AIR - GC/MS VOA ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: TestAmerica Burlington Job No. : 200-47318-1 SDG No. : Client Sample ID: 6294 Lab Sample ID: 200-47318-12 '`.v Matrix: Air Lab File ID: 34522-24.D Analysis Method: TO-15 Date Collected: 02/07/2019 00:00 Sample wt/vol: 200 (mL) Date Analyzed: 02/12/2019 06:54 Soil Aliquot Vol: Dilution Factor: 1 Soil Extract Vol. : GC Column: RTX-624 ID: 0.32 (mm) Moisture: Level: (low/med) Low Analysis Batch No. : 139868 Units: ppb v/v CAS NO. COMPOUND NAME RESULT Q RL RL 71-43-2 Benzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 107-06-2 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 142-82-5 n-Heptane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 ' 79-01-6 Trichloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 ?J. 80-62-6 Methyl methacrylate 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 78-87-5 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 123-91-1 1,4-Dioxane 5.0 U 5.0 5.0 • 75-27-4 Bromodichloromethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 10061-01-5 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-10-1 methyl isobutyl ketone 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 1 6 108-88-3 Toluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 10061-02-6 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 79-00-5 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 127-18-4 Tetrachloroethene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 591-78-6 Methyl Butyl Ketone (2-Hexanone) 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 124-48-1 Dibromochloromethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 106-93-4 1,2-Dibromoethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-90-7 Chlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 100-41-4 Ethylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 179601-23-1 m,p-Xylene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 95-47-6 Xylene, o- 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 1330-20-7 Xylene (total) 0.70 U 0.70 0.70 100-42-5 Styrene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 75-25-2 Bromoform 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 98-82-8 Cumene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 79-34-5 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 103-65-1 n-Propylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 622-96-8 4-Ethyltoluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 108-67-8 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 95-49-8 2-Chlorotoluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 98-06-6 tert-Butylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 95-63-6 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 135-98-8 sec-Butylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 99-87-6 4-Isopropyltoluene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 541-73-1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 106-46-7 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 FORM I TO-15 Page 36 of 55 3/15/2019 FORM I AIR - GC/MS VOA ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET Lab Name: TestAmerica Burlington Job No. : 200-47318-1 SDG No. : Client Sample ID: 6294 Lab Sample ID: 200-47318-12 11 Matrix: Air Lab File ID: 34522-24.D Analysis Method: TO-15 Date Collected: 02/07/2019 00:00 Sample wt/vol: 200 (mL) Date Analyzed: 02/12/2019 06:54 Soil Aliquot Vol: Dilution Factor: 1 Soil Extract Vol. : GC Column: RTX-624 ID: 0.32 (mm) % Moisture: Level: (low/med) Low Analysis Batch No. : 139868 Units: ppb v/v CAS NO. COMPOUND NAME RESULT Q RL RL 100-44-7 Benzyl chloride 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 104-51-8 n-Butylbenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 95-50-1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 120-82-1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 1' 87-68-3 Hexachlorobutadiene 0.20 U 0.20 0.20 91-20-3 Naphthalene 0.50 U 0.50 0.50 16 FORM I TO-15 Page 37 of 55 3/15/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 09:28:13 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 TestAmerica Burlington Target Compound Quantitation Report Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHC.i\20190211-34522.b\34522-24.D Lims ID: 200-47318-A-12 Client ID: 6294 Sample Type: Client Inject. Date: 12-Feb-2019 06:54:30 ALS Bottle#: 24 Worklist Smp#: 24 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Sample Info: 200-0034522-024 Operator ID: ert Instrument ID: CHC.i Method: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHC.i\20190211-34522.b\TO15_MasterMethod_(v1)_CHC.i.m Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Last Update: 13-Feb-2019 09:28:12 Calib Date: 06-Feb-2019 00:53:30 Integrator: RTE ID Type: Deconvolution ID Quant Method: Internal Standard Quant By: Initial Calibration Last ICal File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHC.i\20190205-34442.b\34442-11.D Column 1 : RTX-624 ( 0.32 mm) Det: MS SCAN Process Host: CTX0306 First Level Reviewer: puangmaleek Date: 13-Feb-2019 09:28:12 RT Adj RT Dlt RT OnCol Amt Compound Sig (min.) (min.) (min.) Q Response ppb v/v Flags 1 Propene 41 2.962 ND U 2 Dichlorodifluoromethane 85 3.026 ND 3 Chlorodifluoromethane 51 3.074 ND U • 4 1,2-Dichloro-1,1,2,2-tetra 85 3.288 ND 5 Chloromethane 50 3.410 ND 6 Butane 43 3.613 ND 16 7 Vinyl chloride 62 3.650 ND 8 Butadiene 54 3.725 ND 10 Bromomethane 94 4.387 ND 11 Chloroethane 64 4.622 ND 13 Vinyl bromide 106 5.011 ND 14 Trichlorofluoromethane 101 5.123 ND 17 Ethanol 45 5.695 ND U 20 1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trif 101 6.207 ND 21 1,1-Dichloroethene 96 6.234 ND 22 Acetone 43 6.447 ND 23 Carbon disulfide 76 6.612 ND 24 Isopropyl alcohol 45 6.773 ND 25 3-Chloro-1-propene 41 7.018 ND 27 Methylene Chloride 49 7.312 ND 28 2-Methyl-2-propanol 59 7.546 ND 29 Methyl tert-butyl ether 73 7.728 ND 31 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 61 7.765 ND 33 Hexane 57 8.171 ND 34 1,1-Dichloroethane 63 8.624 ND 35 Vinyl acetate 43 8.715 ND 37 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 96 9.740 ND 38 2-Butanone (MEK) 72 9.777 ND 39 Ethyl acetate 88 9.841 ND 40 Chlorobromomethane 128 10.199 10.199 0.000 78 482046 10.0 S 30 1,2-Dichloroethene, Total 61 10.200 ND 41 Tetrahydrofuran 42 10.210 ND Page 38 of 55 3/15/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 09:28:13 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHC.i\201 9021 1-34522.b\34522-24.D RT Adj RT Dlt RT OnCol Amt Compound Sig (min.) (min.) (min.) Q Response ppb v/v Flags 42 Chloroform 83 10.343 ND 43 Cyclohexane 84 10.599 ND 44 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 97 10.615 ND 45 Carbon tetrachloride 117 10.871 ND 47 Benzene 78 11.325 ND U 46 Isooctane 57 11.330 ND 48 1,2-Dichloroethane 62 11.501 ND 49 n-Heptane 43 11.736 ND * 501,4-Difluorobenzene 114 12.184 12.184 0.000 93 2884886 10.0 53 Trichloroethene 95 12.654 ND 54 1,2-Dichloropropane 63 13.188 ND 55 Methyl methacrylate 69 13.385 ND 56 1,4-Dioxane 88 13.422 ND 57 Dibromomethane 174 13.454 ND 58 Dichlorobromomethane 83 13.769 ND 60 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 75 14.719 ND 61 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK 43 14.997 ND 65 Toluene 92 15.312 ND 66 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 75 15.915 ND U 67 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 83 16.283 ND 68 Tetrachloroethene 166 16.416 ND 69 2-Hexanone 43 16.737 ND 71 Chlorodibromomethane 129 17.051 ND 72 Ethylene Dibromide 107 17.308 ND * 74 Chlorobenzene-d5 117 18.215 18.215 0.000 84 3056916 10.0 75 Chlorobenzene 112 18.279 ND 16 76 Ethylbenzene 91 18.439 ND U 78 m-Xylene& p-Xylene 106 18.690 ND 79 o-Xylene 106 19.522 ND 80 Styrene 104 19.576 ND 81 Bromoform 173 20.008 ND S 73 Xylenes, Total 106 20.100 ND 82 lsopropylbenzene 105 20.238 ND 84 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 83 20.910 ND 85 N-Propylbenzene 91 20.985 ND 88 4-Ethyltoluene 105 21.177 ND 89 2-Chlorotoluene 91 21.182 ND 90 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 105 21.289 ND 92 tert-Butylbenzene 119 21.791 ND 93 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 105 21.887 ND U 94 sec-Butylbenzene 105 22.122 ND U 95 4-Isopropyltoluene 119 22.330 ND 96 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 146 22.351 ND U 97 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 146 22.490 ND U 98 Benzyl chloride 91 22.677 ND U 100 n-Butylbenzene 91 22.895 ND U 101 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 146 23.007 ND U 103 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 180 25.409 ND 104 Hexachlorobutadiene 225 25.601 ND 105 Naphthalene 128 25.852 ND U Page 39 of 55 3/15/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 09:28:13 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 QC Flag Legend Review Flags U - Marked Undetected Reagents: ATTO15CISs00010 Amount Added: 20.00 Units: mL Run Reagent 16 Page 40 of 55 3/15/2019 Report Date:13-Feb-2019 09:28:13 Chrom Revision:2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHC.i\20190211-34522.b\34522-24.D Injection Date: 12-Feb-2019 06:54:30 Instrument ID: CHC.i Operator ID: ert Lims ID: 200-47318-A-12 Lab Sample ID: 200-47318-12 Worklist Smp#: 24 Client ID: 6294 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil.Factor: 1.0000 ALS Bottle#: 24 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_(v1)_CHC.i Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column:RTX-624(0.32 mm) Y Scaling:Method Defined:Set to Absolute Y Value 1 34522-24[MS SCAN Chro]:Total rn , N 1 Nr ai O C 9 1: r' = N O y D 1 IC O 0 d (D 0 O L_ r 5 4 S O 1 0 0 1 U g 11 0 0 0 0 1i X Y C 16 • I 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0 24.0 26.0 28.0 30.0 Min Page 41 of 55 3/15/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 09:28:13 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHC.i\20190211-34522.b\34522-24.D Injection Date: 12-Feb-2019 06:54:30 Instrument ID: CHC.i Lims ID: 200-47318-A-12 Lab Sample ID: 200-47318-12 Client ID: 6294 Operator ID: ert ALS Bottle#: 24 Worklist Smp#: 24 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_(v1)_CHC.i Limit Group: AI_T015ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 1 Propene, CAS: 115-07-1 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 17(2.97) m/z 41.0 11 44 42- I 5 35- 0 X X 28- AI A 207N 21- } 40N >- 14- � 78N 3 2.8 3.1 Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 FT I i' mh Enhanced Spec:Scan 17(2.97),Qvalue=11 m/z 42.0 11 44 21 0 1: I • o_ • o X X 1 207" 40" > 16 78" • 191\1 ` 2.8 3.1 i Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 FT I m17 Ref Spec: 1 Propene (NIST) m/z 39.0 11 i 4 41 o 3 a X42 0 2: XX >- } 21 1, ,d ` 2.8 3.1 Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 FT I m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 2.97 41.00 775 0.037394 2.96 42.00 0 2.96 39.00 0 Reviewer: puangmaleek, 13-Feb-2019 09:26:32 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 42 of 55 3/15/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 09:28:13 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHC.i\20190211-34522.b\34522-24.D Injection Date: 12-Feb-2019 06:54:30 Instrument ID: CHC.i Lims ID: 200-47318-A-12 Lab Sample ID: 200-47318-12 Client ID: 6294 Operator ID: ert ALS Bottle#: 24 Worklist Smp#: 24 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_(v1)_CHC.i Limit Group: Al 1015 ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 3 Chlorodifluoromethane, CAS: 75-45-6 Processing Results 7 RawSpec:Scan46(3.13) 2, m/z 51.0 6 44 N 21 ri 0 5' o_ 1: x 4 40' x 1 >- 3: >- 2 78N 207N 1: -'51 i 3.0 i Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 FT I m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 46(3.13),Qvalue=1 m/z 67.0 7 i 44 6 >, 5, _� c x 4 40N x �4 >- 3: >- � 1 . 2 78� 207N 1: 151 i i I 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 3.0 m/7 Min Ref Spec: 3 Chlorodifluoromethane (NIST) m/z 69.0 11 i 51 a O ; •- O - O C XX >- • >- 67N 1.. 501. II ... i i i 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 3.0 m/7 Min RT Mass Response Amount 3.13 51.00 100 0.002364 3.07 67.00 0 3.07 69.00 0 Reviewer: puangmaleek, 13-Feb-2019 09:26:34 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 43 of 55 3/15/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 09:28:13 Chrom Revision:2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHC.i\20190211-34522.b\34522-24.D Injection Date: 12-Feb-2019 06:54:30 Instrument ID: CHC.i Lims ID: 200-47318-A-12 Lab Sample ID: 200-47318-12 Client ID: 6294 Operator ID: ert ALS Bottle#: 24 Worklist Smp#: 24 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_(v1)_CHC.i Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 17 Ethanol, CAS: 64-17-5 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 531(5.72) m/z 45.0 2: 207 2, o 2 21 �i 0 0 21 X 1II >- 1: >1 1 5.6 Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 pi m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 531(5.72),Qvalue=l m/z 46.0 2: 207 2, 21 } 11 } 16 i 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 5.6 m/7 Min 11 Ref Spec: 17 Ethanol (NIST) 0 } X46 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 5.72 45.00 111 0.015208 5.69 46.00 0 Reviewer: puangmaleek, 13-Feb-2019 09:26:39 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 44 of 55 3/15/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 09:28:13 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHC.i\20190211-34522.b\34522-24.D Injection Date: 12-Feb-2019 06:54:30 Instrument ID: CHC.i Lims ID: 200-47318-A-12 Lab Sample ID: 200-47318-12 Client ID: 6294 Operator ID: ert ALS Bottle#: 24 Worklist Smp#: 24 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_(v1)_CHC.i Limit Group: Al_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 47 Benzene, CAS: 71-43-2 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 1580(11.31) m/z 78.0 2' 78 2 v 21 207 21 0 0 1: X_ 1; x 111 r 1 > i 11.2 11.5 ` Min 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 FT i m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 1580(11.31),Qvalue=11 m/z 77.0 2' 78 207 1 21 0 0 1 X1i X c 1 16 • 11.2 11.5 ` Min 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 FT I m/7 Ref Spec: 47 Benzene (DATA) 11 i 78 0 0 0 X ill! 1 51 G 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 m17 RT Mass Response Amount 11.31 78.00 346 0.003344 11.32 77.00 0 Reviewer: puangmaleek, 13-Feb-2019 09:27:04 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 45 of 55 3/15/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 09:28:13 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHC.i\20190211-34522.b\34522-24.D Injection Date: 12-Feb-2019 06:54:30 Instrument ID: CHC.i Lims ID: 200-47318-A-12 Lab Sample ID: 200-47318-12 Client ID: 6294 Operator ID: ert ALS Bottle#: 24 Worklist Smp#: 24 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_(v1)_CHC.i Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 66 trans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene, CAS: 10061-02-6 Processing Results 1 Raw Spec:Scan 2444(15.93) m/z 75.0 207 11 011 0 0 o _o X X ; rn r .- X208 Ai 96" li 133\I. I 191 I., J 15.8 r, Min 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 FT I m17 1 Enhanced Spec:Scan 2444(15.93),Qvalue=1 m/z 110.0 207 _ 0 1i CD •E o c X X >- : 16 208 96 li 133\I. i 191\I.. I,. i ' f 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 15.8 m/7 Min 1 Ref Spec: 66 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene (NIST) 0 0 0 X } -.39 77\ (110 i ..I.i. .! 7 "-..I.0"38 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 15.93 75.00 283 0.004280 15.91 110.00 0 Reviewer: puangmaleek, 13-Feb-2019 09:27:14 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 46 of 55 3/15/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 09:28:13 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHC.i\20190211-34522.b\34522-24.D Injection Date: 12-Feb-2019 06:54:30 Instrument ID: CHC.i Lims ID: 200-47318-A-12 Lab Sample ID: 200-47318-12 Client ID: 6294 Operator ID: ert ALS Bottle#: 24 Worklist Smp#: 24 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_(v1)_CHC.i Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 76 Ethylbenzene, CAS: 100-41-4 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 2874(18.22) m/z 91.0 1 117 0 11 0 1: o _ X 82'' >- • 'P119 • 541 - 18.1 18.4 18.7 �k _�I _.116 J�� Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 RT I m/7 Amdis Enhanced Spec:Scan 2874(18.22),Qvalue=46 m/z 106.0 91 116 1 0 7: 0 1 x 6 118 > 5 81N >- 3' 2: 1 i18.1 18A 18.7 i .I Z?. I. d .81 --� Min i 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 RT m/7 1 Ref Spec: 76 Ethylbenzene (NIST) 91 ED' • CD _ X > X106 51� ,L. I. _ .1 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 18.22 91.00 5862 0.028577 18.44 106.00 0 Reviewer: puangmaleek, 13-Feb-2019 09:27:28 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 47 of 55 3/15/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 09:28:13 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHC.i\20190211-34522.b\34522-24.D Injection Date: 12-Feb-2019 06:54:30 Instrument ID: CHC.i Lims ID: 200-47318-A-12 Lab Sample ID: 200-47318-12 Client ID: 6294 Operator ID: ert ALS Bottle#: 24 Worklist Smp#: 24 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_(v1)_CHC.i Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 93 1 ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene, CAS: 95-63-6 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 3586(22.02) 1 m/z 105.0 21 207 I 1 0 1: x 1 x 1 _ c 253N • 73� 96� 133 191N X208 — - - ` 1 VIII I i I 1 II 135 I I �� III 1 1232I I 21.8 Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 f;2T 11117 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3586(22.02),Qvalue=1 m/z 120.0 21 207 0 1: X_o 1 } 1 } 16 253N 73N. 96N. 133N 191N X208 ` VIII I I I I I 115 I I l i III I I 2321 II 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 21.8 m/7 Min 1 Ref Spec 93 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene (NIST) 105 0 ><- v120 v120 77N c 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 22.02 105.00 225 0.001150 21.89 120.00 0 Reviewer: puangmaleek, 13-Feb-2019 09:27:44 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 48 of 55 3/15/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 09:28:13 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHC.i\20190211-34522.b\34522-24.D Injection Date: 12-Feb-2019 06:54:30 Instrument ID: CHC.i Lims ID: 200-47318-A-12 Lab Sample ID: 200-47318-12 Client ID: 6294 Operator ID: ert ALS Bottle#: 24 Worklist Smp#: 24 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_(v1)_CHC.i Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 94 sec-Butylbenzene, CAS: 135-98-8 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 3613(22.16) m/z 105.0 2, 207 1: 1 0 21 0 0 1 X1a X c 1 i 253 73 96� 13 X147 191 `'208 i i I• III I I I I �I �i II 1 III III 1 I I I I I 22.0 Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 FT I m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3613(22.16),Qvalue=1 m/z 134.0 2, 207 1: 1 csi i 0 21 0 0 1 X1i X c >- >- 16 1 i 253N. 73 96 13 X147 191) ` 208 i i I• III 1 I 1 I iI I� �I I ISI III I I ! III 22.0 Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 FT i m/7 11 Ref Spec: 94 sec-Butylbenzene (NIST) m/z 91.0 105 3' o 31 X • X 2 \/\" } 1: v `� 1 • . 91 6. 134' I i — 1 _ J. ... -II _.I. I _h 22. 0 Min i 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 FT I m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 22.16 105.00 157 0.000551 22.16 134.00 99 22.12 91.00 0 Reviewer: puangmaleek, 13-Feb-2019 09:27:46 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 49 of 55 3/15/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 09:28:13 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHC.i\20190211-34522.b\34522-24.D Injection Date: 12-Feb-2019 06:54:30 Instrument ID: CHC.i Lims ID: 200-47318-A-12 Lab Sample ID: 200-47318-12 Client ID: 6294 Operator ID: ert ALS Bottle#: 24 Worklist Smp#: 24 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_(v1)_CHC.i Limit Group: AI_TO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 ( 0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 96 1 ,3-Dichlorobenzene, CAS: 541-73-1 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 3650(22.36) m/z 146.0 i 2: 207 2 0 2, 21 0 0 x 21 x 1 >- 11 } 11 1 73 X208 253Ni i \i ` I I I 96I 1 I IJ J15 I 1177\I III I 11 1 22.2 22.5 Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 FT I m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3650(22.36),Qvalue=1 m/z 111.0 2: 207 S", _O _ .0 0 2, c X 21 X >- 1: 16 1 73' '208 253) I 1 I 96I II 133 II/1 III 1 177\I III II I I Ii 11 i . i I 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 22.2 22.5 m/7 Min Ref Spec: 96 1,3-Dichlorobenzene (NIST) m/z 148.0 11 i , 146 1 0 o 1 0 0 X_ 148 j< 111N } • 75N 73�� J 113 I�150 22.2 22.5 ` I. a.._ I. _W._ _ II I. Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 FT I m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 22.36 146.00 180 0.001268 22.35 111.00 0 22.35 148.00 0 Reviewer: puangmaleek, 13-Feb-2019 09:27:48 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 50 of 55 3/15/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 09:28:13 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHC.i\20190211-34522.b\34522-24.D Injection Date: 12-Feb-2019 06:54:30 Instrument ID: CHC.i Lims ID: 200-47318-A-12 Lab Sample ID: 200-47318-12 Client ID: 6294 Operator ID: ert ALS Bottle#: 24 Worklist Smp#: 24 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod (v1)_CHC.i Limit Group: AITO15ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 97 1 ,4-Dichlorobenzene, CAS: 106-46-7 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 3650(22.36) m/z 146.0 207 2, 2: 21 / 0 2, 0 1 I 1 o ; X 21 X . 1 >' 1; } 1 • 73N (208 253N1 I 1 I I I 96I 1 I33 Iiv1lu5 I 177\I III I I 22.4 ` Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 FT m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3650(22.36),Qvalue=1 m/z 111.0 2: 207 T 0 2, o c X 21 1; >- 6 1 1 73" '208 253 �I 133' I I I 96I 1 I I1 11115 I 177NI III I I I I II 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 22.4 m/7 Min Ref Spec: 97 1,4-Dichlorobenzene (NIST) m/z 148.0 11 4 146 3 CT _ S_ 0 2: X X148 >7 21 >- } 1 1, • 111N 75NI X113 I�150 22.4 -1. [ Ill. I. _- li. Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 FT I m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 22.36 146.00 180 0.001247 22.49 111.00 0 22.49 148.00 0 Reviewer: puangmaleek, 13-Feb-2019 09:27:49 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 51 of 55 3/15/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 09:28:13 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHC.i\20190211-34522.b\34522-24.D Injection Date: 12-Feb-2019 06:54:30 Instrument ID: CHC.i Lims ID: 200-47318-A-12 Lab Sample ID: 200-47318-12 Client ID: 6294 Operator ID: ert ALS Bottle#: 24 Worklist Smp#: 24 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_(v1)_CHC.i Limit Group: AlTO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 98 Benzyl chloride, CAS: 100-44-7 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 3708(22.67) m/z 91.0 4207 41 31 N N 0 31 0 3 X x 2 >- 2, >- 1: 1: 1 1208 253 73� N 133N 3 191 X232 I � i I I Il 1115 II �1 ISI I I h l� 1 22.6 i Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 FT I m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3708(22.67),Qvalue=1 m/z 126.0 4 207 31 I 3; 2 0 0 0 31 0 21 X j< >- 2, 1 I 1: 11 1 6 1 253 73N N 133N 191 , 3 191 1208 ` 44I I 11 96II I I I I I I I1�135 it Ill III ( 326 d I 22.6 1 Min 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 FT I m17 11 Ref Spec: 98 Benzyl chloride (NIST) m/z 65.0 91 T O S E O XX >- , } 126N ,L_. .6.65l. ' 89'f,, 92 (128 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 22.6 m/7 Min RT Mass Response Amount 22.67 91.00 371 0.002243 22.68 126.00 0 22.68 65.00 0 Reviewer: puangmaleek, 13-Feb-2019 09:27:50 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 52 of 55 3/15/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 09:28:13 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHC.i\20190211-34522.b\34522-24.D Injection Date: 12-Feb-2019 06:54:30 Instrument ID: CHC.i Lims ID: 200-47318-A-12 Lab Sample ID: 200-47318-12 Client ID: 6294 Operator ID: ert ALS Bottle#: 24 Worklist Smp#: 24 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_(v1)_CHC.i Limit Group: AITO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 100 n-Butylbenzene, CAS: 104-51-8 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 3749(22.89) m/z 91.0 o 4• 207 5, N 0 4 0 4 x 3 x 41 r 2: } 3 21 2: 253N X232 1208 191 ` III 73\1 1961 II i33I I� �, S a III II III I ii i i 1 22.8 Min i 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 IST 1 m/7 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3749(22.89),Qvalue=1 m/z 134.0 4 LO 4• 207 co 3 N X 3 x 2: >- 2: >- 21 I l 14 21 1, X208 253N 191 i — �232 ` 22.8 II I 73 I 19161 II a 11331 I��, S a ii III II III I 11 Ili i I Min i 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 FT 1 m/7 1 Ref Spec: 100 n-Butylbenzene (NIST) m/z 92.0 91 _ T O • •E O — O c Xi /92 X >- >- 134N \ I _ 65 X105 i 1 I 30 50 70 901 110 130 150 170 190 210 230 250 270 22.8 m/7 Min RT Mass Response Amount 22.89 91.00 147 0.000683 22.90 134.00 344 22.90 92.00 0 Reviewer: puangmaleek, 13-Feb-2019 09:27:52 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 53 of 55 3/15/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 09:28:13 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHC.i\20190211-34522.b\34522-24.D Injection Date: 12-Feb-2019 06:54:30 Instrument ID: CHC.i Lims ID: 200-47318-A-12 Lab Sample ID: 200-47318-12 Client ID: 6294 Operator ID: ert ALS Bottle#: 24 Worklist Smp#: 24 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15MasterMethod_(v1)_CHC.i Limit Group: AI_T015_ICAL Column: RTX-624 (0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 101 1,2-Dichlorobenzene, CAS: 95-50-1 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 3770(23.00) m/z 146.0 5: i N 207 31 4' 0 2 M 0 4 N 0 0 21 X 3 x 1 i } 2: } 1 11 21 1, 73� 96� 133 1 191 I�208 1253 ` _ II III 1 I i Ii/1�� 1i77li L I` , `. i di I. 22.9 Min i 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 FT I m17 51 Enhanced Spec:Scan 3770(23.00),Qvalue=1 m/z 111.0 4 207 � T 0 4E F__• 3 X } 2: 16 21 73 96 133 2 33 i "i III I I 1 I+/1li i77 Ii91 II IL 208 I. i5 1i�i L 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 22.9 m17 Min 11 Ref Spec: 101 1,2-Dichlorobenzene (NIST) m/z 148.0 146 3' E7 31 ocE _ X 148X2� ' x I \ 1: >- >- 1 \_ 111N 75- 1 6 '113 X150 ` 1 .. 73"dl. a._ — ..,i I. III. 22.9 Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 V m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 23.00 146.00 124 0.000893 23.01 111.00 0 23.01 148.00 0 Reviewer: puangmaleek, 13-Feb-2019 09:28:02 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 54 of 55 3/15/2019 Report Date: 13-Feb-2019 09:28:13 Chrom Revision: 2.3 15-Jan-2019 08:51:34 User Disabled Compound Report TestAmerica Burlington Data File: \\chromna\Burlington\ChromData\CHC.i\20190211-34522.b\34522-24.D Injection Date: 12-Feb-2019 06:54:30 Instrument ID: CHC.i Lims ID: 200-47318-A-12 Lab Sample ID: 200-47318-12 Client ID: 6294 Operator ID: ert ALS Bottle#: 24 Worklist Smp#: 24 Purge Vol: 200.000 mL Dil. Factor: 1.0000 Method: TO15_MasterMethod_(v1)_CHC.i Limit Group: AI_TO15_ICAL Column: RTX-624 ( 0.32 mm) Detector MS SCAN 105 Naphthalene, CAS: 91-20-3 Processing Results Raw Spec:Scan 4309(25.88) 4 m/z 128.0 6 207 3 00 5, `n N O 2: x 4 21 >- 3: >- 1, 2 1; '208 73N 96� 133 X135 191\I N I I Ilu dill � I I I II SII I .1 iIl Ii `�i II2 I1 AIL L 25.8 Min 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 VT m17 Enhanced Spec:Scan 4309(25.88),Qvalue=1 6 207 0 5• X 4 >- 30 16 2 1: '208 �L 731 96� 13311135 191) 232�1253 1 I 731 96 11 1, I I I II II I I n 1 Ii LI] . 11 i L 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 m17 11 Ref Spec: 105 Naphthalene (NIST) 128 _o X >- • 1021 127,U'129 i IJJ 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 m/7 RT Mass Response Amount 25.88 128.00 237 0.001083 Reviewer: puangmaleek, 13-Feb-2019 09:28:09 Audit Action: Marked Compound Undetected Audit Reason: Invalid Compound ID Page 55 of 55 3/15/2019 Ell T-'::;a' 13 j TestAmerica _ , . -,_ . .-.-,:,,„,,,,,,. THE LEADER IN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING El ANALYTICAL REPORT TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. TestAmerica Cedar Falls • 704 Enterprise Drive Cedar Falls, IA 50613 Tel: (319)277-2401 TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 , PP -. TestAmerica Sample Delivery Group: B5503-0003 Client Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows - Orono, MN s!!!!!ik For: Wenck Associates, Inc 1802 Wooddale Drive .._ Suite 1003 , . Woodbury, Minnesota 55125 Attn: Michelle Hosfield ' '', ''',.'''‘'ft;'-, 7,. .--. ..-..... .. , .v Authorized for release by: r+ 3/12/2019 4:38:24 PM Zach Bindert, Project Manager '\\,\ r f - (319)227-2401 4 zach.bindert@testamericainc.com tf t: „.t'se T r results I '.ug TOtc�ACCeSs w H es ons #A r- This report has been electronically signed and authorized by the signatory.Electronic signature is ��a ii intended to be the legally binding equivalent of a traditionally handwritten signature. Ex•ert ,, >` Results relate only to the items tested and the sample(s)as received by the laboratory. y '. iV1tu5at: `' www.tes americainc.com y r Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Table of Contents Cover Page 1 Table of Contents 2 Case Narrative 3 Sample Summary 5 Detection Summary 6 Client Sample Results 9 Definitions 32 Surrogate Summary 33 QC Sample Results 37 QC Association 57 Chronicle 63 Certification Summary 68 Method Summary 69 Chain of Custody 70 Receipt Checklists 73 • TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 2 of 73 3/12/2019 Case Narrative Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 •Job ID: 310-150364-1El Laboratory: TestAmerica Cedar Falls Narrative Job Narrative .: 310-150364-1 Comments No additional comments. Receipt The samples were received on 3/5/2019 10:05 AM;the samples arrived in good condition, properly preserved and,where required, on ice. The temperatures of the 2 coolers at receipt time were 0.4°C and 1.3°C. GC/MS VOA Method(s)8260B:The continuing calibration verification(CCV)associated with batch 310-231648 recovered above the upper control limit for trans-1,3-Dichloropropene(25.1%D). The samples associated with this CCV were non-detects for the affected analytes;therefore,the data have been reported. The following sample is impacted: (CCV 310-231648/3). Method(s)8260B:The continuing calibration verification(CCV)associated with batch 310-231648 recovered above the upper control limit for Chloroethane(23.0%D). The samples associated with this CCV were non-detects for the affected analytes;therefore,the data have been reported. The following sample is impacted: (CCV 310-231648/4). Method(s)8260B:The method blank for preparation batch 310-231646 contained 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene and m&p-Xylenes above the reporting limit(RL). None of the samples associated with this method blank contained the target compound;therefore, re-extraction and/or re-analysis of samples were not performed. lethod(s)8260B:The surrogate recovery for the CCV and the LCS associated with analytical batch 310-231411 was outside the upper ontrol limits. The sample surrogate recovery is within limits. Method(s)8260B:The continuing calibration verification (CCV)associated with batch 310-231750 recovered above the upper control limit for Chloroethane(44.8%D). The samples associated with this CCV were non-detects for the affected analytes;therefore,the data have been reported. The following sample is impacted: (CCV 310-231750/4). Method(s)8260B:The method blank for preparation batch 310-231748 contained Chloroethane above the reporting limit(RL). None of the samples associated with this method blank contained the target compound;therefore, re-extraction and/or re-analysis of samples were not performed. No additional analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described above or in the Definitions/Glossary page. GC/MS Semi VOA Method(s)8270D SIM:The RPD of the laboratory control sample(LCS)and laboratory control sample duplicate(LCSD)for batch preparation batch 310-231616 and analytical batch 31 0-231 71 1 recovered outside control limits for the following analytes: Benzo[g,h,i]perylene and Pyrene. Method(s)8270D SIM:The following samples were diluted due to the nature of the sample matrix: B-6 22.5-25'(310-150364-2), B-7 5-10' (310-150364-3), B-7 15-20'(310-150364-4), B-8 15-17.5'(310-150364-5), B-9 9-10'(310-150364-6), B-10 0-5'(310-150364-7), B-10 (310-150364-8), (310-150364-C-2-A MS)and(310-150364-C-2-B MSD). Elevated reporting limits(RLs)are provided. Method(s)8270D SIM: Surrogate recovery for the following samples were outside control limits: B-6 22.5-25'(310-150364-2), B-7 5-10' (310-150364-3), B-7 15-20'(310-150364-4), (310-150364-C-2-A MS)and(310-150364-C-2-B MSD). Evidence of matrix interference is present;therefore, re-extraction and/or re-analysis was not performed. No additional analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described above or in the Definitions/Glossary page. GC VOA ethod(s)WI-GRO: Surrogate recovery for the following sample was outside control limits: B-6 22.5-25'(310-150364-2). Evidence of atrix interference is present;therefore, re-extraction and/or re-analysis was not performed. TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 3 of 73 3/12/2019 Case Narrative Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Job ID: 310-150364-1 (Continued) Laboratory: TestAmerica Cedar Falls (Continued) No additional analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described above or in the Definitions/Glossary page. GC Semi VOA Method(s)8082A:The following sample appears to contain polychlorinated biphenyls(PCBs); however, due to weathering or other environmental processes,the PCBs in the sample do not closely match any of the laboratory's Aroclor standards used for instrument calibration: B-6 22.5-25'(310-150364-2). The sample(s)has been quantified and reported as Aroclor PCB-1260. Due to the poor match with the Aroclor standard(s),there is increased qualitative and quantitative uncertainty associated with this result. Method(s)8082A: Surrogate recovery for the following sample was outside control limits: B-8 15-17.5'(310-150364-5). Evidence of matrix interference is present;therefore, re-extraction and/or re-analysis was not performed. Method(s)8082A: Surrogate recovery for the following sample was outside control limits: B-7 5-10'(310-150364-3). Evidence of matrix interference is present;therefore, re-extraction and/or re-analysis was not performed. Method(s)8082A:The following samples were diluted due to the nature of the sample matrix: B-6 22.5-25'(310-150364-2), B-7 5-10' (310-150364-3), B-7 15-20'(310-150364-4)and B-8 15-17.5'(310-150364-5). Elevated reporting limits(RLs)are provided. Method(s)8082A:The following sample was diluted due to the nature of the sample matrix: B-7 5-10'(310-150364-3). Elevated reporting limits(RLs)are provided. Method(s)WI-DRO:Significant peaks, readily distinguished from background,were detected in the following samples within five minutes • after the end of the analytical window defined by the last component eluting in the Diesel Range Organics(DRO)mix(i.e., n-Octacosane): B-8 15-17.5'(310-150364-5), B-9 9-10'(310-150364-6)and B-10 0-5'(310-150364-7). Method(s)WI-DRO: Significant peaks, readily distinguished from background,were detected in the following sample within five minutes after the end of the analytical window defined by the last component eluting in the Diesel Range Organics(DRO)mix(i.e., n-Octacosane): B-7 5-10'(310-150364-3). No additional analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described above or in the Definitions/Glossary page. Metals Method(s)6010C,6010D:The following samples were diluted due to the presence of an interferent. B-7 5-10'(310-150364-3), B-7 15-20' (310-150364-4)and B-8 15-17.5'(310-150364-5). Elevated reporting limits(RLs)are provided. No additional analytical or quality issues were noted,other than those described above or in the Definitions/Glossary page. General Chemistry No analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described in the Definitions/Glossary page. Organic Prep No analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described in the Definitions/Glossary page. VOA Prep No analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described in the Definitions/Glossary page. TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 4 of 73 3/12/2019 Sample Summary Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Matrix Collected Received 310-150364-1 Trip Blank Soil 03/01/19 08:00 03/05/19 10:05 4 310-150364-2 B-6 22.5-25' Soil 03/01/19 10:25 03/05/19 10:05 310-150364-3 B-7 5-10' Soil 03/01/19 11:05 03/05/19 10:05 310-150364-4 B-7 15-20' Soil 03/01/19 11:20 03/05/19 10:05 ,r ,' 310-150364-5 B-8 15-17.5' Soil 03/01/19 12:15 03/05/19 10:05 310-150364-6 B-9 9-10' Soil 03/01/19 13:50 03/05/19 10:05 310-150364-7 B-10 0-5' Soil 03/01/19 15:30 03/05/19 10:05 310-150364-8 B-10 Ground Water 03/01/19 16:00 03/05/19 10:05 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 5 of 73 3/12/2019 Detection Summary Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: Trip Blank Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-1 No Detections. Client Sample ID: B-6 22.5-25' Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-2 0 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type Benzo[a]anthracene 0.237 Fl F2 0.137 mg/Kg 10 0 8270D SIM Total/NA Benzo[a]pyrene 0.182 Fl F2 0.137 mg/Kg 10 0 8270D SIM Total/NA Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.292 Fl F2 0.137 mg/Kg 10 0 8270D SIM Total/NA Chrysene 0.370 Fl F2 0.137 mg/Kg 10 0 8270D SIM Total/NA Fluoranthene 0.829 F2 0.137 mg/Kg 10 0 8270D SIM Total/NA Fluorene 0.163 Fl 0.137 mg/Kg 10 * 8270D SIM Total/NA 2-Methylnaphthalene 0.192 0.137 mg/Kg 10 0 8270D SIM Total/NA Naphthalene 0.922 0.137 mg/Kg 10 0 8270D SIM Total/NA Phenanthrene 0.785 F2 0.137 mg/Kg 10 0 8270D SIM Total/NA Pyrene 0.917 F2 0.137 mg/Kg 10 -0 8270D SIM Total/NA PCB-1260 0.0702 0.0693 mg/Kg 1 0 8082A Total/NA Diesel Range Organics(DRO) 857 49.9 mg/Kg 5 0 WI-DRO Silica Gel Cleanup Barium 138 Fl 1.31 mg/Kg 1 * 6010D Total/NA Cadmium 1.55 1.31 mg/Kg 1 -0 6010D Total/NA Chromium 18.0 1.31 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Lead 113 6.54 mg/Kg 1 0 6010D Total/NA Mercury 0.120 Fl 0.0283 mg/Kg 1 0 7471B Total/NA Client Sample ID: B-7 5-10' Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-3 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type Naphthalene 2.28 0.405 mg/Kg 1 0 8260B Total/NA Acenaphthene 14.8 1.32 mg/Kg 100 0 8270D SIM Total/NA Acenaphthylene 3.56 1.32 mg/Kg 100 -0 8270D SIM Total/NA Anthracene 52.3 1.32 mg/Kg 100 0 8270D SIM Total/NA Benzo[a]anthracene 81.4 1.32 mg/Kg 100 0 8270D SIM Total/NA Benzo[a]pyrene 65.2 1.32 mg/Kg 100 0 8270D SIM Total/NA Benzo[b]fluoranthene 82.3 1.32 mg/Kg 100 -0 8270D SIM Total/NA Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 22.0 1.32 mg/Kg 100 -0 8270D SIM Total/NA Benzo[k]fluoranthene 34.1 1.32 mg/Kg 100 0 8270D SIM Total/NA Chrysene 75.8 1.32 mg/Kg 100 0 8270D SIM Total/NA Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 3.74 1.32 mg/Kg 100 0- 8270D SIM Total/NA Fluoranthene 174 13.2 mg/Kg 1000 8270D SIM Total/NA Fluorene 26.0 1.32 mg/Kg 100 -0 8270D SIM Total/NA Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 27.7 1.32 mg/Kg 100 0 8270D SIM Total/NA 2-Methylnaphthalene 4.89 1.32 mg/Kg 100 0 8270D SIM Total/NA Naphthalene 12.9 1.32 mg/Kg 100 0 8270D SIM Total/NA Phenanthrene 153 13.2 mg/Kg 1000 0 8270D SIM Total/NA Pyrene 136 13.2 mg/Kg 1000 0 8270D SIM Total/NA Wisconsin GRO 14.1 12.8 mg/Kg 1 0 WI-GRO Total/NA Diesel Range Organics(DRO) 9960 712 mg/Kg 100 0 WI-DRO Silica Gel Cleanup Barium 123 3.96 mg/Kg 4 -0 6010D Total/NA Chromium 3040 3.96 mg/Kg 4 0 6010D Total/NA Lead 1210 19.8 mg/Kg 4 3 6010D Total/NA Mercury 0.0439 0.0252 mg/Kg 1 -0 7471B Total/NA This Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results. TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 6 of 73 3/12/2019 Detection Summary Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-7 15-20' Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-4 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.318 0.223 mg/Kg 1 * 8260B Total/NA Naphthalene 0.657 0.557 mg/Kg 1 * 8260B Total/NA 0 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.395 0.223 mg/Kg 1 * 8260B Total/NA Acenaphthene 0.171 0.159 mg/Kg 10 * 8270D SIM Total/NA Anthracene 0.235 0.159 mg/Kg 10 * 8270D SIM Total/NA Benzo[a]anthracene 0.394 0.159 mg/Kg 10 a 8270D SIM Total/NA Benzo[a]pyrene 0.302 0.159 mg/Kg 10 0 8270D SIM Total/NA Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.443 0.159 mg/Kg 10 * 8270D SIM Total/NA Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.197 0.159 mg/Kg 10 8270D SIM Total/NA Chrysene 0.364 0.159 mg/Kg 10 * 8270D SIM Total/NA Fluoranthene 0.998 0.159 mg/Kg 10 8270D SIM Total/NA Fluorene 0.241 0.159 mg/Kg 10 * 8270D SIM Total/NA 2-Methylnaphthalene 0.701 0.159 mg/Kg 10 * 8270D SIM Total/NA Naphthalene 1.29 0.159 mg/Kg 10 * 8270D SIM Total/NA Phenanthrene 0.956 0.159 mg/Kg 10 * 8270D SIM Total/NA Pyrene 0.826 0.159 mg/Kg 10 ° 8270D SIM Total/NA PCB-1260 0.204 0.0788 mg/Kg 1 * 8082A Total/NA Diesel Range Organics(DRO) 196 8.63 mg/Kg 1 * WI-DRO Silica Gel Cleanup 'q5,1 Barium 169 3.95 mg/Kg 3 * 6010D Total/NA Chromium 33.1 3.95 mg/Kg 3 * 6010D Total/NA Lead 150 19.8 mg/Kg 3 a 6010D Total/NA Mercury 3.99 0.301 mg/Kg 10 * 7471B Total/NA tient Sample ID: B-8 15-17.5' Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-5 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type Anthracene 0.127 0.120 mg/Kg 10 a 8270D SIM Total/NA Benzo[a]anthracene 0.542 0.120 mg/Kg 10 0 8270D SIM Total/NA Benzo[a]pyrene 0.813 0.120 mg/Kg 10 8270D SIM Total/NA Benzo[b]fluoranthene 1.35 0.120 mg/Kg 10 * 8270D SIM Total/NA Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 0.574 0.120 mg/Kg 10 * 8270D SIM Total/NA Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.403 0.120 mg/Kg 10 * 8270D SIM Total/NA Chrysene 0.715 0.120 mg/Kg 10 8270D SIM Total/NA Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 0.160 0.120 mg/Kg 10 * 8270D SIM Total/NA Fluoranthene 0.933 0.120 mg/Kg 10 * 8270D SIM Total/NA Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 0.460 0.120 mg/Kg 10 * 8270D SIM Total/NA Phenanthrene 0.447 0.120 mg/Kg 10 * 8270D SIM Total/NA Pyrene 0.890 0.120 mg/Kg 10 * 8270D SIM Total/NA Diesel Range Organics(DRO) 164 6.45 mg/Kg 1 * WI-DRO Silica Gel Cleanup Barium 238 6.97 mg/Kg 7 * 6010D Total/NA Cadmium 7.76 6.97 mg/Kg 7 6010D Total/NA Chromium 34.7 6.97 mg/Kg 7 * 6010D Total/NA Lead 784 34.8 mg/Kg 7 * 6010D Total/NA Mercury 0.435 0.0223 mg/Kg 1 * 7471B Total/NA Client Sample ID: B-9 9-10' Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-6 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type Anthracene 0.153 0.115 mg/Kg 10 * 8270D SIM Total/NA his Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results. TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 7 of 73 3/12/2019 Detection Summary Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-9 9-10' (Continued) Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-6 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type Benzo[a]anthracene 0.627 0.115 mg/Kg 10 8270D SIM Total/NA Benzo[a]pyrene 0.653 0.115 mg/Kg 10 * 8270D SIM Total/NA Benzo[b]fluoranthene 1.02 0.115 mg/Kg 10 * 8270D SIM Total/NA 0 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 0.274 0.115 mg/Kg 10 * 8270D SIM Total/NA Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.365 0.115 mg/Kg 10 8270D SIM Total/NA Chrysene 0.610 0.115 mg/Kg 10 * 8270D SIM Total/NA Fluoranthene 1.12 0.115 mg/Kg 10 * 8270D SIM Total/NA Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 0.304 0.115 mg/Kg 10 * 8270D SIM Total/NA Phenanthrene 0.515 0.115 mg/Kg 10 * 8270D SIM Total/NA Pyrene 0.987 0.115 mg/Kg 10 * 8270D SIM Total/NA Diesel Range Organics(DRO) 19.6 5.92 mg/Kg 1 # WI-DRO Silica Gel Cleanup Arsenic 4.81 3.82 mg/Kg 1 * 6010D Total/NA Barium 166 0.955 mg/Kg 1 6010D Total/NA Cadmium 1.23 0.955 mg/Kg 1 * 6010D Total/NA Chromium 29.0 0.955 mg/Kg 1 * 6010D Total/NA Lead 370 4.78 mg/Kg 1 * 6010D Total/NA Mercury 0.155 0.0216 mg/Kg 1 * 7471B Total/NA Client Sample ID: B-10 0-5' Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-7 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type Diesel Range Organics(DRO) 19.1 5.86 mg/Kg 1 * WI-DRO Silica Gel Cleanup Barium 154 0.949 mg/Kg 1 *- 6010D Total/NA Chromium 16.1 0.949 mg/Kg 1 ' 6010D Total/NA Lead 25.4 4.74 mg/Kg 1 6010D Total/NA Mercury 0.0357 0.0232 mg/Kg 1 * 7471B Total/NA Client Sample ID: B-10 Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-8 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type Barium 0.360 0.00200 mg/L 1 6020B Dissolved This Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results. TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 8 of 73 3/12/2019 Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 ;lient Sample ID: Trip Blank Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-1 Date Collected: 03/01/19 08:00 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 03/05/19 10:05 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Acetone <0.500 0.500 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 Allyl chloride <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 °, 1 Benzene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 Bromobenzene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 Bromochloromethane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 Bromodichloromethane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 Bromoform <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 Bromomethane <0.500 0.500 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 2-Butanone(MEK) <0.250 0.250 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 n-Butylbenzene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 sec-Butylbenzene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 tert-Butylbenzene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 Carbon tetrachloride <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 Chlorobenzene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 Chlorodibromomethane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 Dichlorofluoromethane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 v t. 'r' Chloroethane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 Chloroform <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 Chloromethane <0.250 0.250 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 4-Chlorotoluene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 2-Chlorotoluene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 Dibromomethane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 1,2-Dichloroethane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 1,1-Dichloroethane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 1,1-Dichloroethene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 1,2-Dichloropropane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 1,3-Dichloropropane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 2,2-Dichloropropane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 1,1-Dichloropropene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 Diethyl ether <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 Ethylbenzene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 Hexachlorobutadiene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 Isopropylbenzene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 p-lsopropyltoluene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 Methylene Chloride <0.250 0.250 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 Methyl tert-butyl ether <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 Naphthalene <0.250 0.250 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 N-Propylbenzene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 9 of 73 3/12/2019 Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: Trip Blank Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-1 Date Collected: 03/01/19 08:00 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 03/05/19 10:05 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac t, 1-' Styrene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 6 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 Tetrachloroethene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 Tetrahydrofuran <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 Toluene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 Trichloroethene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 Trichlorofluoromethane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 Vinyl chloride <0.100 0.100 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 ; Xylenes,Total <0.150 0.150 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 96 80-120 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 1326 1 Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) 93 80-120 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 Toluene-d8(Surr) 99 80-120 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:26 1 Method:WI-GRO-Wisconsin -Gasoline Range Organics (GC) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Wisconsin GRO <10.0 10.0 mg/Kg 03/05/19 12:00 03/05/19 15:13 1 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 96 80-120 03/05/19 12:00 03/05/19 15:13 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 10 of 73 3/12/2019 Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 :Tient Sample ID: B-6 22.5-25' Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-2 Date Collected: 03/01/19 10:25 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 03/05/19 10:05 Percent Solids: 69.3 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac s Acetone <1.04 1.04 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 Allyl chloride <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 6 Benzene <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 Bromobenzene <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg a 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 Bromochloromethane <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 Bromodichloromethane <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 Bromoform <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 Bromomethane <1.04 1.04 mg/Kg 0 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 2-Butanone(MEK) <0.520 0.520 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 n-Butylbenzene <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 sec-Butylbenzene <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 tert-Butylbenzene <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 Carbon tetrachloride <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 Chlorobenzene <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 Chlorodibromomethane <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 Dichlorofluoromethane <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 Chloroethane <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 Chloroform <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 Chloromethane <0.520 0.520 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 4-Chlorotoluene <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 2-Chlorotoluene <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 Dibromomethane <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg -a 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 1,2-Dichloroethane <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg 0 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 1,1-Dichloroethane <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg o 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 1,1-Dichloroethene <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg r 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 1,2-Dichloropropane <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 1,3-Dichloropropane <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 2,2-Dichloropropane <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 1,1-Dichloropropene <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 Diethyl ether <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg -* 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 Ethylbenzene <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 Hexachlorobutadiene <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg -a 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 Isopropylbenzene <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg a 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 p-Isopropyltoluene <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg a 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 Methylene Chloride <0.520 0.520 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 Methyl tert-butyl ether <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg a 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 Naphthalene <0.520 0.520 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 N-Propylbenzene <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 11 of 73 3/12/2019 Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-6 22.5-25' Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-2 Date Collected: 03/01/19 10:25 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 03/05/19 10:05 Percent Solids: 69.3 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Styrene <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg r 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 0 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 Tetrachloroethene <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg r 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 Tetrahydrofuran <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 Toluene <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg a 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg zx 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 Trichloroethene <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 Trichlorofluoromethane <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg # 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg * 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 09:11 1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 Vinyl chloride <0.208 0.208 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 Xylenes,Total <0.312 0.312 mg/Kg * 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 09:11 1 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 99 80-120 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13.50 1 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 97 80-120 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 09:11 1 Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) 91 80-120 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) 95 80-120 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 09:11 1 Toluene-d8(Surr) 99 80-120 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 13:50 1 Toluene-d8(Surr) 98 80.120 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 09:11 1 Method: 8270D SIM -Semivolatile Organic Compound (GC/MS SIM LL) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Acenaphthene mg/Kg<0.137 Fl 0.137 m /K a 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 16:23 10 Acenaphthylene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 16:23 10 Anthracene <0.137 Fl F2 0.137 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 16:23 10 Benzo[a]anthracene 0.237 Fl F2 0.137 mg/Kg 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 16:23 10 Benzo[a]pyrene 0.182 Fl F2 0.137 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 16:23 10 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.292 Fl F2 0.137 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 16:23 10 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 16:23 10 Benzo[k]fluoranthene <0.137 Fl F2 0.137 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 16:23 10 Chrysene 0.370 Fl F2 0.137 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 16:23 10 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene <0.137 0.137 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 16:23 10 Fluoranthene 0.829 F2 0.137 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 16:23 10 Fluorene 0.163 Fl 0.137 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 16:23 10 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene <0.137 Fl F2 0.137 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 16:23 10 2-Methylnaphthalene 0.192 0.137 mg/Kg 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 16:23 10 Naphthalene 0.922 0.137 mg/Kg 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 16:23 10 Phenanthrene 0.785 F2 0.137 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 16:23 10 Pyrene 0.917 F2 0.137 mg/Kg *' 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 16:23 10 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 2-Fluorobiphenyl(Surr) 63 28-110 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 16:23 10 Nitrobenzene-d5(Surr) 127 X 22-110 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 16.23 10 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 12 of 73 3/12/2019 Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 :Tient Sample ID: B-6 22.5-25' Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-2 Date Collected: 03/01/19 10:25 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 03/05/19 10:05 Percent Solids: 69.3 Method: 8270D SIM -Semivolatile Organic Compound (GC/MS SIM LL) (Continued) Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Lst Terphenyl-d14(Surr) 50 26-110 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 16:23 10 6 Method: WI-GRO-Wisconsin -Gasoline Range Organics (GC) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Wisconsin GRO <16.4 16.4 mg/Kg 03/05/19 12:00 03/05/19 21:45 1 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 76 X 80-120 03/05/19 12:00 03/05/19 21:45 1 Method: 8082A - Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) by Gas Chromatography Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac PCB-1016 <0.347 0.347 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:39 03/08/19 12:15 5 PCB-1221 <0.347 0.347 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:39 03/08/19 12:15 5 PCB-1232 <0.347 0.347 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:39 03/08/19 12:15 5 PCB-1242 <0.347 0.347 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:39 03/08/19 12:15 5 PCB-1248 <0.347 0.347 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:39 03/08/19 12:15 5 PCB-1254 <0.0693 0.0693 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:39 03/07/19 00:50 1 " PCB-1260 0.0702 0.0693 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:39 03/07/19 00:50 1 PCB-1268 <0.0693 0.0693 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:39 03/07/19 00:50 1 Polychlorinated biphenyls,Total <0.347 0.347 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:39 03/08/19 12:15 5 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac DCB Decachlorobiphenyl(Surr) 38 10-110 03/05/19 13:39 03/07/19 00:50 1 LTetrachloro-m-xylene 57 10-110 03/05/19 13:39 03/07/19 00:50 1 Method: WI-DRO -Wisconsin - Diesel Range Organics (GC) -Silica Gel Cleanup Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Diesel Range Organics(DRO) 857 49.9 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:25 03/07/19 11:37 5 Method: 6010D - Metals (ICP) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Arsenic <5.23 5.23 mg/Kg # 03/06/19 10:16 03/07/19 13:05 1 Barium 138 Fl 1.31 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 10:16 03/07/19 13:05 1 Cadmium 1.55 1.31 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 10:16 03/07/19 13:05 1 Chromium 18.0 1.31 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 10:16 03/07/19 13:05 1 Lead 113 6.54 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 10:16 03/07/19 13:05 1 Selenium <9.81 9.81 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 10:16 03/07/19 13:05 1 Silver <1.31 1.31 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 10:16 03/07/19 13:05 1 Method: 7471B - Mercury (CVAA) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Mercury 0.120 Fl 0.0283 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 10:39 03/07/19 10:06 1 General Chemistry Analyte Result Qualifier RL RL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Percent Moisture 30.7 0.1 % 03/05/19 11:27 1 Percent Solids 69.3 0.1 % 03/05/19 11:27 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 13 of 73 3/12/2019 Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-7 5-10' Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-3 Date Collected: 03/01/19 11:05 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 03/05/19 10:05 Percent Solids: 74.6 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) `. Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 3. Acetone <0.809 0.809 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 Allyl chloride <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 6 Benzene <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 Bromobenzene <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg a 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 Bromochloromethane <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg a 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 Bromodichloromethane <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg a 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 Bromoform <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 Bromomethane <0.809 0.809 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 2-Butanone(MEK) <0.405 0.405 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 n-Butylbenzene <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 sec-Butylbenzene <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 tert-Butylbenzene <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 Carbon tetrachloride <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 Chlorobenzene <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 Chlorodibromomethane <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 Dichlorofluoromethane <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 Chloroethane <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 Chloroform <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 Chloromethane <0.405 0.405 mg/Kg # 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 4-Chlorotoluene <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 2-Chlorotoluene <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg a 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg o 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 Dibromomethane <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg + 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 1,2-Dichloroethane <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 1,1-Dichloroethane <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 1,1-Dichloroethene <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 1,2-Dichloropropane <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg a 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 1,3-Dichloropropane <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 2,2-Dichloropropane <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 1,1-Dichloropropene <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 Diethyl ether <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg a 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 Ethylbenzene <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg 0 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 Hexachlorobutadiene <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 lsopropylbenzene <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 p-Isopropyltoluene <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg a 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 Methylene Chloride <0.405 0.405 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 Methyl tert-butyl ether <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 Naphthalene 2.28 0.405 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 N-Propylbenzene <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg a 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 14 of 73 3/12/2019 Client Sample Results Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 client Sample ID: B-7 5-10' Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-3 Date Collected: 03/01/19 11:05 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 03/05/19 10:05 Percent Solids: 74.6 Method: 8260B-Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Styrene <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg -0 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 6 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg 0 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 Tetrachloroethene <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 Tetrahydrofuran <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 Toluene <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg fF 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 Trichloroethene <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 Trichlorofluoromethane <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg 3> 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg ° 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg 0 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 . Vinyl chloride <0.162 0.162 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1i Xylenes,Total <0.243 0.243 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 94 80-120 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) 93 80-120 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 Toluene-d8(Surr) 97 80-120 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:15 1 Method: 8270D SIM -Semivolatile Organic Compound (GC/MS SIM LL) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Acenaphthene 14.8 1.32 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 17:18 100 Acenaphthylene 3.56 1.32 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 17:18 100 Anthracene 52.3 1.32 mg/Kg 0 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 17:18 100 Benzo[a]anthracene 81.4 1.32 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 17:18 100 Benzo[a]pyrene 65.2 1.32 mg/Kg -0 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 17:18 100 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 82.3 1.32 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 17:18 100 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 22.0 1.32 mg/Kg a 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 17:18 100 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 34.1 1.32 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 17:18 100 Chrysene 75.8 1.32 mg/Kg 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 17:18 100 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 3.74 1.32 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 17:18 100 Fluoranthene 174 13.2 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/07/19 15:19 1000 Fluorene 26.0 1.32 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 17:18 100 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 27.7 1.32 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 17:18 109 2-Methylnaphthalene 4.89 1.32 mg/Kg a 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 17:18 100 Naphthalene 12.9 1.32 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 17:18 100 Phenanthrene 153 13.2 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/07/19 15:19 1000 Pyrene 136 13.2 mg/Kg a 03/05/19 13:33 03/07/19 15:19 1000 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 2-Fluorobiphenyl(Surr) 88 28_110 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 17:18 100 Nitrobenzene-d5(Surr) 192 X 22-110 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 1718 100 Terphenyl-d14(Surr) 141 X 26-110 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 17:18 100 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 15 of 73 3/12/2019 Client Sample Results Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-7 5-10' Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-3 Date Collected: 03/01/19 11:05 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 03/05/19 10:05 Percent Solids: 74.6 Method:WI-GRO-Wisconsin -Gasoline Range Organics (GC) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Wisconsin GRO 14.1 12.8 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 12:00 03/05/19 22:23 1 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac t.{. 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 84 80-120 03/05/19 12:00 03/05/19 22:23 1 Method: 8082A -Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) by Gas Chromatography Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac PCB-1016 <3.25 3.25 mg/Kg 0 03/05/19 13:39 03/08/19 12:26 50 PCB-1221 <3.25 3.25 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:39 03/08/19 12:26 50 PCB-1232 <3.25 3.25 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:39 03/08/19 12:26 50 PCB-1242 <3.25 3.25 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:39 03/08/19 12:26 50 PCB-1248 <3.25 3.25 mg/Kg 0 03/05/19 13:39 03/08/19 12:26 50 PCB-1254 <0.130 0.130 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:39 03/11/19 15:27 2 PCB-1260 <0.130 0.130 mg/Kg 03/05/19 13:39 03/11/19 15:27 2 PCB-1268 <0.130 0.130 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:39 03/11/19 15:27 2 Polychlorinated biphenyls,Total <3.25 3.25 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:39 03/08/19 12:26 50 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac DCB Decachlorobiphenyl(Surr) 8 X 10-110 03/05/19 13:39 03/08/19 12:26 50 Tetrachloro-m-xylene 92 10-110 03/05/19 13:39 03/08/19 12:26 50 Method: WI-DRO -Wisconsin -Diesel Range Organics (GC) -Silica Gel Cleanup Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Diesel Range Organics(DRO) 9960 712 mg/Kg 0 03/05/19 13:25 03/08/19 07:10 100 Method: 6010D - Metals (ICP) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Arsenic <15.8 15.8 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 10:16 03/07/19 13:45 4 Barium 123 3.96 mg/Kg 0 03/06/19 10:16 03/07/19 13:45 4 Cadmium <3.96 3.96 mg/Kg 0 03/06/19 10:16 03/07/19 13:45 4 Chromium 3040 3.96 mg/Kg # 03/06/19 10:16 03/07/19 13:45 4 Lead 1210 19.8 mg/Kg 0 03/06/19 10:16 03/07/19 13:45 4 Selenium <29.7 29.7 mg/Kg 0 03/06/19 10:16 03/07/19 13:45 4 Silver <3.96 3.96 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 10:16 03/07/19 13:45 4 Method: 7471B - Mercury (CVAA) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Mercury 0.0439 0.0252 mg/Kg 0 03/06/19 10:39 03/07/19 10:15 1 General Chemistry Analyte Result Qualifier RL RL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Percent Moisture 25.4 0.1 % 03/05/19 11:27 1 Percent Solids 74.6 0.1 % 03/05/19 11:27 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 16 of 73 3/12/2019 Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-7 15-20' Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-4 Date Collected: 03/01/19 11:20 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 03/05/19 10:05 Percent Solids: 62.6 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) :{ Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Acetone <1.11 1.11 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 Allyl chloride <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 6 Benzene <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 Bromobenzene <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 Bromochloromethane <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 Bromodichloromethane <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 Bromoform <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 Bromomethane <1.11 1.11 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 2-Butanone(MEK) <0.557 0.557 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 n-Butylbenzene <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 sec-Butylbenzene <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg a 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 tert-Butylbenzene <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 Carbon tetrachloride <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 Chlorobenzene <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 Chlorodibromomethane <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 Dichlorofluoromethane <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 t.; Chloroethane <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 - Chloroform <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 Chloromethane <0.557 0.557 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 4-Chlorotoluene <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 2-Chlorotoluene <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg r 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 Dibromomethane <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.318 0.223 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 1,2-Dichloroethane <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 1,1-Dichloroethane <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 1,1-Dichloroethene <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg a 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 1,2-Dichloropropane <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 1,3-Dichloropropane <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 2,2-Dichloropropane <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 1,1-Dichloropropene <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 Diethyl ether <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 Ethylbenzene <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 Hexachlorobutadiene <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg # 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 Isopropylbenzene <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 p-Isopropyltoluene <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 Methylene Chloride <0.557 0.557 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 Methyl tert-butyl ether <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 Naphthalene 0.657 0.557 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 N-Propylbenzene <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 17 of 73 3/12/2019 Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-7 15-20' Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-4 Date Collected: 03/01/19 11:20 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 03/05/19 10:05 Percent Solids: 62.6 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Styrene <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 .._... 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 a 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 Tetrachloroethene <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg 0 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 Tetrahydrofuran <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg a 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 Toluene <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg a 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 Trichloroethene <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 Trichlorofluoromethane <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.395 0.223 mg/Kg # 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 09:36 1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 Vinyl chloride <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg 0 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 Xylenes,Total <0.334 0.334 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 97 80-120 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 99 80-120 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 09:36 1 Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) 92 80-120 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) 91 80-120 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 09:36 1 Toluene-d8(Surr) 96 80-120 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 14:39 1 Toluene-d8(Surr) 98 80-120 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 09:36 1 Method: 8270D SIM - Semivolatile Organic Compound (GC/MS SIM LL) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Acenaphthene 0.171 0.159 mg/Kg 0 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 17:36 10 Acenaphthylene <0.159 0.159 mg/Kg -a 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 17:36 10 Anthracene 0.235 0.159 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 17:36 10 Benzo[a]anthracene 0.394 0.159 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 17:36 10 Benzo[a]pyrene 0.302 0.159 mg/Kg 3 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 17:36 10 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.443 0.159 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 17:36 10 Benzolg,h,i]perylene <0.159 0.159 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 17:36 10 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.197 0.159 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 17:36 10 Chrysene 0.364 0.159 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 17:36 10 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene <0.159 0.159 mg/Kg a 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 17:36 10 Fluoranthene 0.998 0.159 mg/Kg a 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 17:36 10 Fluorene 0.241 0.159 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 17:36 10 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene <0.159 0.159 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 17:36 10 2-Methylnaphthalene 0.701 0.159 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 17:36 10 Naphthalene 1.29 0.159 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 17:36 10 Phenanthrene 0.956 0.159 mg/Kg 0 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 17:36 10 Pyrene 0.826 0.159 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 17:36 10 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 2-Fluorobiphenyl(Surr) 70 28-110 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 17:36 10 Nitrobenzene-d5(Surr) 138 X 22.110 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 17:36 10 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 18 of 73 3/12/2019 Client Sample Results Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 :Tient Sample ID: B-7 15-20' Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-4 Date Collected: 03/01/19 11:20 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 03/05/19 10:05 Percent Solids: 62.6 Method: 8270D SIM -Semivolatile Organic Compound (GC/MS SIM LL) (Continued) < ; Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Terphenyl-d14(Surr) 59 26-110 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 17:36 10 6 Method: WI-GRO -Wisconsin -Gasoline Range Organics (GC) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Wisconsin GRO <16.3 16.3 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 12:00 03/05/19 23:02 1 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 102 80-120 03/05/19 12:00 03/05/19 23:02 1 Method: 8082A -Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) by Gas Chromatography Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac PCB-1016 <0.394 0.394 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:39 03/08/19 12:37 5 PCB-1221 <0.394 0.394 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:39 03/08/19 12:37 5 PCB-1232 <0.394 0.394 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:39 03/08/19 12:37 5 PCB-1242 <0.394 0.394 mg/Kg # 03/05/19 13:39 03/08/19 12:37 5 PCB-1248 <0.394 0.394 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:39 03/08/19 12:37 5 PCB-1254 <0.0788 0.0788 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:39 03/07/19 01:11 1 r , PCB-1260 0.204 0.0788 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:39 03/07/19 01:11 1 '1., '' PCB-1268 <0.0788 0.0788 mg/Kg xs 03/05/19 13:39 03/07/19 01:11 1 Polychlorinated biphenyls,Total <0.394 0.394 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:39 03/08/19 12:37 5 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac DCB Decachlorobiphenyl(Surr) 42 10-110 03/05/19 13:39 03/07/19 01:11 1 LTetrachloro-m-xylene 52 10-110 03/05/19 13:39 03/07/19 01:11 1 Method: WI-DRO -Wisconsin - Diesel Range Organics (GC) -Silica Gel Cleanup Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Diesel Range Organics(DRO) 196 8.63 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:25 03/07/19 11:25 1 Method: 6010D -Metals (ICP) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Arsenic <15.8 15.8 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 10:16 03/07/19 13:47 3 Barium 169 3.95 mg/Kg o 03/06/19 10:16 03/07/19 13:47 3 Cadmium <3 95 3.95 mg/Kg a 03/06/19 10:16 03/07/19 13:47 3 Chromium 33.1 3.95 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 10:16 03/07/19 13:47 3 Lead 150 19.8 mg/Kg # 03/06/19 10:16 03/07/19 13:47 3 Selenium <29.6 29.6 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 10:16 03/07/19 13:47 3 Silver <3.95 3.95 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 10:16 03/07/19 13:47 3 Method: 7471B - Mercury (CVAA) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Mercury 3.99 0.301 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 10:39 03/07/19 11:08 10 General Chemistry Analyte Result Qualifier RL RL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Percent Moisture 37.4 0.1 % 03/05/19 11:27 1 Percent Solids 62.6 0.1 % 03/05/19 11:27 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 19 of 73 3/12/2019 Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-8 15-17.5' Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-5 Date Collected: 03/01/19 12:15 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 03/05/19 10:05 Percent Solids: 78.8 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac LA-,<„ Acetone <0.745 0.745 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 Allyl chloride <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 6 Benzene <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 Bromobenzene <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg 0 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 Bromochloromethane <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 Bromodichloromethane <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 Bromoform <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 Bromomethane <0.745 0.745 mg/Kg 0 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 2-Butanone(MEK) <0.372 0.372 mg/Kg *. 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 n-Butylbenzene <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg 0 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 sec-Butylbenzene <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 tert-Butylbenzene <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 Carbon tetrachloride <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 Chlorobenzene <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 Chlorodibromomethane <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg a 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 Dichlorofluoromethane <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 Chloroethane <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg # 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 Chloroform <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 Chloromethane <0.372 0.372 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 4-Chlorotoluene <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 2-Chlorotoluene <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 Dibromomethane <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 1,2-Dichloroethane <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg a 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 1,1-Dichloroethane <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 1,1-Dichloroethene <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg 0- 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 1,2-Dichloropropane <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg r 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 1,3-Dichloropropane <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 2,2-Dichloropropane <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 1,1-Dichloropropene <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 Diethyl ether <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 Ethylbenzene <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg # 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 Hexachlorobutadiene <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 Isopropylbenzene <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 p-lsopropyltoluene <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg a 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 Methylene Chloride <0.372 0.372 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 Methyl tert-butyl ether <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 Naphthalene <0.372 0.372 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 N-Propylbenzene <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 20 of 73 3/12/2019 Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 ;tient Sample ID: B-8 15-17.5' Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-5 Date Collected: 03/01/19 12:15 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 03/05/19 10:05 Percent Solids: 78M Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) it i Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac #-' ,:_, Styrene <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 >.,, 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg 0 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 6 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 Tetrachloroethene <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 Tetrahydrofuran <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 Toluene <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg 0 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg 0 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 Trichloroethene <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 Trichlorofluoromethane <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg o 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 Vinyl chloride <0.149 0.149 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 -.. Xylenes,Total <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg 0 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 98 80-120 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) 93 80-120 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 Toluene-d8(Surr) 98 80-120 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:03 1 Method: 8270D SIM -Semivolatile Organic Compound (GC/MS SIM LL) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Acenaphthene <0.120 0.120 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 18:13 10 Acenaphthylene <0.120 0.120 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 18:13 10 Anthracene 0.127 0.120 mg/Kg 0 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 18:13 10 Benzo[a]anthracene 0.542 0.120 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 18:13 10 Benzo[a]pyrene 0.813 0.120 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 18:13 10 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 1.35 0.120 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 18:13 10 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 0.574 0.120 mg/Kg 0 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 18:13 10 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.403 0.120 mg/Kg a 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 18:13 10 Chrysene 0.715 0.120 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 18:13 10 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 0.160 0.120 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 18:13 10 Fluoranthene 0.933 0.120 mg/Kg # 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 18:13 10 Fluorene <0.120 0.120 mg/Kg la 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 18:13 10 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 0.460 0.120 mg/Kg 0 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 18:13 10 2-Methylnaphthalene <0.120 0.120 mg/Kg 0 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 18:13 10 Naphthalene <0.120 0.120 mg/Kg 0 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 18:13 10 Phenanthrene 0.447 0.120 mg/Kg 0 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 18:13 10 Pyrene 0.890 0.120 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 18:13 10 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 2-Fluorobiphenyl(Surr) 73 28_110 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 18:13 10 Nitrobenzene-d5(Surr) 86 22-110 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 18:13 10 Terphenyl-d14(Surr) 70 26-110 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 18:13 10 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 21 of 73 3/12/2019 Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-8 15-17.5' Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-5 Date Collected: 03/01/19 12:15 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 03/05/19 10:05 Percent Solids: 78.8 Method:WI-GRO-Wisconsin -Gasoline Range Organics (GC) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Wisconsin GRO <12.2 12.2 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 12:00 03/05/19 23:40 1 . oji Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac R 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 94 80-120 03/05/19 12:00 03/05/19 23:40 1 Method: 8082A -Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) by Gas Chromatography Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac PCB-1016 <0.620 0.620 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:39 03/08/19 12:47 10 PCB-1221 <0.620 0.620 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:39 03/08/19 12:47 10 PCB-1232 <0.620 0.620 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:39 03/08/19 12:47 10 PCB-1242 <0.620 0.620 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:39 03/08/19 12:47 10 PCB-1248 <0.620 0.620 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:39 03/08/19 12:47 10 PCB-1254 <0.0620 0.0620 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:39 03/07/19 01:22 1 PCB-1260 <0.0620 0.0620 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:39 03/07/19 01:22 1 PCB-1268 <0.0620 0.0620 mg/Kg 3 03/05/19 13:39 03/07/19 01:22 1 Polychlorinated biphenyls,Total <0.620 0.620 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:39 03/08/19 12:47 10 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac DCB Decachlorobiphenyl(Surr) 67 10-110 03/05/19 13:39 03/07/19 01:22 1 Tetrachloro-m-xylene 119 X 10-110 03/05/19 13:39 03/07/19 01:22 1 Method: WI-DRO -Wisconsin -Diesel Range Organics (GC) -Silica Gel Cleanup Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Diesel Range Organics(DRO) 164 6.45 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:25 03/07/19 12:02 1 Method: 6010D -Metals (ICP) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Arsenic <27.9 27.9 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 10:16 03/07/19 13:55 7 Barium 238 6.97 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 10:16 03/07/19 13:55 7 Cadmium 7.76 6.97 mg/Kg r 03/06/19 10:16 03/07/19 13:55 7 Chromium 34.7 6.97 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 10:16 03/07/19 13:55 7 Lead 784 34.8 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 10:16 03/07/19 13:55 7 Selenium <52.2 52.2 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 10:16 03/07/19 13:55 7 Silver <6.97 6.97 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 10:16 03/07/19 13:55 7 Method: 7471B - Mercury (CVAA) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Mercury 0.435 0.0223 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 10:39 03/07/19 10:28 1 General Chemistry Analyte Result Qualifier RL RL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Percent Moisture 21.2 0.1 % 03/05/19 11:27 1 Percent Solids 78.8 0.1 % 03/05/19 11:27 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 22 of 73 3/12/2019 Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 :,tient Sample ID: B-9 9-10' Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-6 Date Collected: 03/01/19 13:50 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 03/05/19 10:05 Percent Solids: 85.1 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) : Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac pg. Acetone <0.679 0.679 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 Allyl chloride <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 6 Benzene <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 Bromobenzene <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg 0 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 Bromochloromethane <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 Bromodichloromethane <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 Bromoform <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 Bromomethane <0.679 0.679 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 2-Butanone(MEK) <0.339 0.339 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 n-Butylbenzene <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 sec-Butylbenzene <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 tert-Butylbenzene <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 Carbon tetrachloride <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 Chlorobenzene <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 Chlorodibromomethane <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg r 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 Dichlorofluoromethane <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 i?;.-:,, Chloroethane <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 1527 1 t ,g.- , Chloroform <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg -0 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 Chloromethane <0.339 0.339 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 4-Chlorotoluene <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 2-Chlorotoluene <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg la 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg # 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 Dibromomethane <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 1,2-Dichloroethane <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 1,1-Dichloroethane <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 1,1-Dichloroethene <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg # 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 1,2-Dichloropropane <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 1,3-Dichloropropane <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 2,2-Dichloropropane <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg 0 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 1,1-Dichloropropene <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg a 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg 0 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 Diethyl ether <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 Ethylbenzene <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 Hexachlorobutadiene <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 lsopropylbenzene <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 p-lsopropyltoluene <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 Methylene Chloride <0.339 0.339 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 Methyl tert-butyl ether <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 Naphthalene <0.339 0.339 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 N-Propylbenzene <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 23 of 73 3/12/2019 Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-9 9-10' Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-6 Date Collected: 03/01/19 13:50 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 03/05/19 10:05 Percent Solids: 85.1 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Styrene <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 6 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg # 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 Tetrachloroethene <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg *. 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 Tetrahydrofuran <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 Toluene <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg a 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg 0 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 Trichloroethene <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 Trichlorofluoromethane <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 Vinyl chloride <0.136 0.136 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 •., Xylenes,Total <0.204 0.204 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 96 80-120 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) 94 80-120 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 Toluene-d8(Surr) 99 80-120 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:27 1 Method: 8270D SIM -Semivolatile Organic Compound (GC/MS SIM LL) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Acenaphthene <0.115 0.115 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 18:50 10 Acenaphthylene <0.115 0.115 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 18:50 10 Anthracene 0.153 0.115 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 18:50 10 Benzo[a]anthracene 0.627 0.115 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 18:50 10 Benzo[a]pyrene 0.653 0.115 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 18:50 10 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 1.02 0.115 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 18:50 10 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 0.274 0.115 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 18:50 10 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.365 0.115 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 18:50 10 Chrysene 0.610 0.115 mg/Kg -a 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 18:50 10 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene <0.115 0.115 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 18:50 10 Fluoranthene 1.12 0.115 mg/Kg -a 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 18:50 10 Fluorene <0.115 0.115 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 18:50 10 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 0.304 0.115 mg/Kg 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 18:50 10 2-Methylnaphthalene <0.115 0.115 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 18:50 10 Naphthalene <0.115 0.115 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 18:50 10 Phenanthrene 0.515 0.115 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 18:50 10 Pyrene 0.987 0.115 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 18:50 10 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 2-Fluorobiphenyl(Sun) 81 28-110 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 18:50 10 Nitrobenzene-d5(Surr) 103 22-110 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 18:50 10 Terphenyl-d14(Surr) 64 26-110 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 18:50 10 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 24 of 73 3/12/2019 Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 ;tient Sample ID: B-9 9-10' Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-6 Date Collected: 03/01/19 13:50 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 03/05/19 10:05 Percent Solids: 85.1 Method: WI-GRO-Wisconsin -Gasoline Range Organics (GC) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac y Wisconsin GRO <11.8 11.8 mg/Kg *F03/05/19 12:00 03/06/19 00:18 1 c Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 6 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 94 80-120 03/05/19 12:00 03/06/19 00:18 1 Method: 8082A -Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) by Gas Chromatography Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac PCB-1016 <0.0559 0.0559 mg/Kg *x 03/05/19 13:39 03/11/19 15:37 1 PCB-1221 <0.0559 0.0559 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:39 03/11/19 15:37 1 PCB-1232 <0.0559 0.0559 mg/Kg a 03/05/19 13:39 03/11/19 15:37 1 PCB-1242 <0.0559 0.0559 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:39 03/11/19 15:37 1 PCB-1248 <0.0559 0.0559 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:39 03/11/19 15:37 1 PCB-1254 <0.0559 0.0559 mg/Kg a 03/05/19 13:39 03/11/19 15:37 1 PCB-1260 <0.0559 0.0559 mg/Kg + 03/05/19 13:39 03/11/19 15:37 1 PCB-1268 <0.0559 0.0559 mg/Kg # 03/05/19 13:39 03/11/19 15:37 1 Polychlorinated biphenyls,Total <0.0559 0.0559 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:39 03/11/19 15:37 1 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac DCB Decachlorobiphenyl(Surr) 59 10-110 03/05/19 13:39 03/11/19 15:37 1 Tetrachloro-m-xylene 42 10-110 03/05/19 13:39 03/11/19 15:37 1 Method: WI-DRO -Wisconsin - Diesel Range Organics (GC) -Silica Gel Cleanup Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Diesel Range Organics(DRO) 19.6 5.92 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:25 03/07/19 12:15 1 Method: 6010D - Metals (ICP) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Arsenic 4.81 3.82 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 10:16 03/07/19 13:22 1 Barium 166 0.955 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 10:16 03/07/19 13:22 1 Cadmium 1.23 0.955 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 10:16 03/07/19 13:22 1 Chromium 29.0 0.955 mg/Kg 0 03/06/19 10:16 03/07/19 13:22 1 Lead 370 4.78 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 10:16 03/07/19 13:22 1 Selenium <7.17 7.17 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 10:16 03/07/19 13:22 1 Silver <0.955 0.955 mg/Kg a 03/06/19 10:16 03/07/19 13:22 1 Method: 7471B - Mercury (CVAA) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Mercury 0.155 0.0216 mg/Kg 0 03/06/19 10:39 03/07/19 10:32 1 General Chemistry Analyte Result Qualifier RL RL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Percent Moisture 14.9 0.1 % 03/05/19 11:27 1 Percent Solids 85.1 0.1 % 03/05/19 11:27 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 25 of 73 3/12/2019 Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-10 0-5' Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-7 Date Collected: 03/01/19 15:30 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 03/05/19 10:05 Percent Solids: 81.7 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Oil Fac Acetone <0.742 0.742 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 C Allyl chloride <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg a 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 6 Benzene <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 Bromobenzene <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 Bromochloromethane <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 Bromodichloromethane <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 Bromoform <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg a 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 Bromomethane <0.742 0.742 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 2-Butanone(MEK) <0.371 0.371 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 n-Butylbenzene <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 sec-Butylbenzene <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 tert-Butylbenzene <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 Carbon tetrachloride <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 Chlorobenzene <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 Chlorodibromomethane <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 Dichlorofluoromethane <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 µ Chloroethane <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 X " Chloroform <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 Chloromethane <0.371 0.371 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 4-Chlorotoluene <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 2-Chlorotoluene <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 Dibromomethane <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 1,2-Dichloroethane <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 1,1-Dichloroethane <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 1,1-Dichloroethene <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 1,2-Dichloropropane <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg la 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 1,3-Dichloropropane <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 2,2-Dichloropropane <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 1,1-Dichloropropene <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 Diethyl ether <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg a 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 (benzene <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 9 9 Hexachlorobutadiene <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 Isopropylbenzene <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 p-Isopropyltoluene <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 Methylene Chloride <0.371 0.371 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 Methyl tert-butyl ether <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 Naphthalene <0.371 0.371 mg/Kg 0 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 N-Propylbenzene <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 26 of 73 3/12/2019 Client Sample Results Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Tient Sample ID: B-10 0-5' Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-7 Date Collected: 03/01/19 15:30 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 03/05/19 10:05 Percent Solids: 81.7 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac IM Styrene <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg 0 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg 0 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 6 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg 0 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 Tetrachloroethene <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg 0 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 Tetrahydrofuran <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 Toluene <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg 0 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg 0 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg 0 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 Trichloroethene <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg 0 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 Trichlorofluoromethane <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg 0 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg 0 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg 0 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 Vinyl chloride <0.148 0.148 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 . Xylenes,Total <0.223 0.223 mg/Kg t> 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 96 80-120 03/06/19 05.47 03/06/19 15:51 1 Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) 94 80-120 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 Toluene-d8(Surr) 98 80-120 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 15:51 1 Method: 8270D SIM -Semivolatile Organic Compound (GC/MS SIM LL) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Acenaphthene <0.122 0.122 mg/Kg 0 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 19:27 10 Acenaphthylene <0.122 0.122 mg/Kg 0 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 19:27 10 Anthracene <0.122 0.122 mg/Kg 0- 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 19:27 10 Benzo[a]anthracene <0.122 0.122 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 19:27 10 Benzo[a]pyrene _ <0.122 0.122 mg/Kg 0 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 19:27 10 Benzo[b]fluoranthene <0.122 0.122 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 19:27 10 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene <0.122 0.122 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 19:27 10 Benzo[k]fluoranthene <0.122 0.122 mg/Kg 0 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 19:27 10 Chrysene <0.122 0.122 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 19:27 10 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene <0.122 0.122 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 19:27 10 Fluoranthene <0.122 0.122 mg/Kg 0 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 19:27 10 Fluorene <0.122 0.122 mg/Kg 0 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 19:27 10 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene <0.122 0.122 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 19:27 10 2-Methylnaphthalene <0.122 0.122 mg/Kg 0 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 19:27 10 Naphthalene <0.122 0.122 mg/Kg 0 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 19:27 10 Phenanthrene <0.122 0.122 mg/Kg 0 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 19:27 10 Pyrene <0.122 0.122 mg/Kg 3> 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 19:27 10 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 2-Fluorobiphenyl(Surr) 78 28-110 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 19.27 10 Nitrobenzene-d5(Surr) 77 22-110 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 19:27 10 Terphenyl-d14(Surr) 61 26-110 03/05/19 13:33 03/06/19 19:27 10 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 27 of 73 3/12/2019 Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-10 0-5' Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-7 Date Collected: 03/01/19 15:30 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 03/05/19 10:05 Percent Solids: 81.7 Method: WI-GRO-Wisconsin -Gasoline Range Organics (GC) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac ; Wisconsin GRO <12.6 12.6 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 12:00 03/06/19 00:56 1 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 88 80-120 03/05/19 12:00 03/06/19 00:56 1 Method: 8082A -Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) by Gas Chromatography Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac PCB-1016 <0.0610 0.0610 mg/Kg 3 03/05/19 13:39 03/07/19 01:43 1 PCB-1221 <0.0610 0.0610 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:39 03/07/19 01:43 1 PCB-1232 <0.0610 0.0610 mg/Kg 03/05/19 13:39 03/07/19 01:43 1 PCB-1242 <0.0610 0.0610 mg/Kg 03/05/19 13:39 03/07/19 01:43 1 PCB-1248 <0.0610 0.0610 mg/Kg 03/05/19 13:39 03/07/19 01:43 1 PCB-1254 <0.0610 0.0610 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:39 03/07/19 01:43 1 PCB-1260 <0.0610 0.0610 mg/Kg 03/05/19 13:39 03/07/19 01:43 1 PCB-1268 <0.0610 0.0610 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:39 03/07/19 01:43 1 Polychlorinated biphenyls,Total <0.0610 0.0610 mg/Kg * 03/05/19 13:39 03/07/19 01:43 1 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac DCB Decachlorobiphenyl(Surr) 71 10-110 03/05/19 13:39 03/07/19 01:43 1 Tetrachloro-m-xylene 71 10-110 03/05/19 13:39 03/07/19 01:43 1 Method: WI-DRO -Wisconsin - Diesel Range Organics (GC) -Silica Gel Cleanup Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Diesel Range Organics(DRO) 19.1 5.86 mg/Kg 03/05/19 13:25 03/07/19 12:27 1 Method: 6010D -Metals (ICP) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Arsenic <3.79 3.79 mg/Kg 03/06/19 10:16 03/07/19 13:24 1 Barium 154 0.949 mg/Kg 4 03/06/19 10:16 03/07/19 13:24 1 Cadmium <0.949 0.949 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 10:16 03/07/19 13:24 1 Chromium 16.1 0.949 mg/Kg * 03/06/19 10:16 03/07/19 13:24 1 Lead 25.4 4.74 mg/Kg i 03/06/19 10:16 03/07/19 13:24 1 Selenium <7.12 7.12 mg/Kg 03/06/19 10:16 03/07/19 13:24 1 Silver <0.949 0.949 mg/Kg 3> 03/06/19 10:16 03/07/19 13:24 1 Method: 7471B - Mercury (CVAA) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Mercury 0.0357 0.0232 mg/Kg 03/06/19 10:39 03/07/19 10:34 1 General Chemistry Analyte Result Qualifier RL RL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Percent Moisture 18.3 0.1 % 03/05/19 11:27 1 Percent Solids 81.7 0.1 % 03/05/19 11:27 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 28 of 73 3/12/2019 Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 ;Tient Sample ID: B-10 Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-8 Date Collected: 03/01/19 16:00 Matrix: Ground Water Date Received: 03/05/19 10:05 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) , Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Facli ,k Acetone <10.0 10.0 ug/L 03/06/19 10:52 1 Allyl chloride <2.00 2.00 ug/L 03/06/19 10:52 1 6 Benzene <0.500 0.500 ug/L 03/06/19 10:52 1 Bromobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 10:52 1 Bromochloromethane <5.00 5.00 ug/L 03/06/19 10:52 1 Bromodichloromethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 08:36 1 Bromoform <5.00 5.00 ug/L 03/06/19 10:52 1 Bromomethane <4.00 4.00 ug/L 03/06/19 08:36 1 2-Butanone(MEK) <10.0 10.0 ug/L 03/06/19 10:52 1 n-Butylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 10:52 1 sec-Butylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 10:52 1 tert-Butylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 10:52 1 Carbon tetrachloride <2.00 2.00 ug/L 03/06/19 10:52 1 Chlorobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 10:52 1 Chlorodibromomethane <5.00 5.00 ug/L 03/06/19 10:52 1 Dichlorofluoromethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 10:52 1 Chloroethane <4.00 4.00 ug/L 03/06/19 10:52 1 Chloroform <3.00 3.00 ug/L 03/06/19 10:52 1 Chloromethane <3.00 3.00 ug/L 03/06/19 10:52 1 4-Chlorotoluene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 08:36 1 2-Chlorotoluene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 10:52 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <5.00 5.00 ug/L 03/06/19 10:52 1 1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 10:52 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 10:52 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 10:52 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 10:52 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane <3.00 3.00 ug/L 03/06/19 10:52 1 1,2-Dichloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 10:52 1 1,1-Dichloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 10:52 1 1,1-Dichloroethene <2.00 2.00 ug/L 03/06/19 10:52 1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 10:52 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 10:52 1 1,2-Dichloropropane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 10:52 1 1,3-Dichloropropane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 10:52 1 2,2-Dichloropropane <4.00 4.00 ug/L 03/06/19 10:52 1 1,1-Dichloropropene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 10:52 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 03/06/19 10:52 1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 03/06/19 10:52 1 Diethyl ether <2.00 2.00 ug/L 03/06/19 10:52 1 Ethylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 10:52 1 Hexachlorobutadiene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 03/06/19 10:52 1 lsopropylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 10:52 1 p-Isopropyltoluene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 10:52 1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) <10.0 10.0 ug/L 03/06/19 10:52 1 Methylene Chloride <5.00 5.00 ug/L 03/06/19 10:52 1 Methyl tert-butyl ether <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 10:52 1 Naphthalene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 03/06/19 10:52 1 N-Propylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 10:52 1 Styrene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 10:52 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 29 of 73 3/12/2019 Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-10 Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-8 Date Collected: 03/01/19 16:00 Matrix: Ground Water Date Received: 03/05/19 10:05 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 10:52 1 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 10:52 1 6 Tetrachloroethene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/1910:52 1 Tetrahydrofuran <10.0 10.0 ug/L 03/06/1910:52 1 Toluene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/1910:52 1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 03/06/1910:52 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 03/06/19 10:52 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 10:52 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 10:52 1 Trichloroethene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 10:52 1 Trichlorofluoromethane <4.00 4.00 ug/L 03/06/19 10:52 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 08:36 1 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane <2.00 2.00 ug/L 03/06/19 10:52 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 10:52 1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/1910:52 1 Vinyl chloride <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 10:52 1 Xylenes,Total <3.00 3.00 ug/L 03/06/19 10:52 1 Dibromomethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 08:36 1 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 99 80-120 03/06/19 08:36 1 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 95 80-120 03/06/19 10:52 1 Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) 113 80-120 03/06/19 08:36 1 Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) 105 80-120 03/06/19 10:52 1 Toluene-d8(Surr) 105 80-120 03/06/19 08:36 1 Toluene-d8(Surr) 106 80-120 03/06/19 10:52 1 Method: 8270D SIM -Semivolatile Organic Compound (GC/MS SIM LL) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Acenaphthene <1.20 1.20 ug/L 03/05/19 13:56 03/06/19 13:55 10 Acenaphthylene <1.20 1.20 ug/L 03/05/19 13:56 03/06/19 13:55 10 Anthracene <1.20 1.20 ug/L 03/05/19 13:56 03/06/19 13:55 10 Benzo[a]anthracene <1.20 1.20 ug/L 03/05/19 13:56 03/06/19 13:55 10 Benzo[a]pyrene <1.20 1.20 ug/L 03/05/19 13:56 03/06/19 13:55 10 Benzo[b]fluoranthene <1.20 1.20 ug/L 03/05/19 13:56 03/06/19 13:55 10 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene <1.20 * 1.20 ug/L 03/05/19 13:56 03/06/19 13:55 10 Benzo[k]fluoranthene <1.20 1.20 ug/L 03/05/19 13:56 03/06/19 13:55 10 Chrysene <1.20 1.20 ug/L 03/05/19 13:56 03/06/19 13:55 10 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene <1.20 1.20 ug/L 03/05/19 13:56 03/06/19 13:55 10 Fluoranthene <1.20 1.20 ug/L 03/05/19 13:56 03/06/19 13:55 10 Fluorene <1.20 1.20 ug/L 03/05/19 13:56 03/06/19 13:55 10 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene <1.20 1.20 ug/L 03/05/19 13:56 03/06/19 13:55 10 2-Methylnaphthalene <1.20 1.20 ug/L 03/05/19 13:56 03/06/19 13:55 10 Naphthalene <6.02 6.02 ug/L 03/05/19 13:56 03/06/19 13:55 10 Phenanthrene <1.20 1.20 ug/L 03/05/19 13:56 03/06/19 13:55 10 Pyrene <1.20 * 1.20 ug/L 03/05/19 13:56 03/06/19 13:55 10 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 2-Fluorobiphenyl(Surr) 80 22-110 03/05/19 13:56 03/06/19 13:55 10 Nitrobenzene-d5(Surr) 69 17-116 03/05/19 13:56 03/06/19 13:55 10 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 30 of 73 3/12/2019 Client Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 tient Sample ID: B-10 Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-8 Date Collected: 03/01/19 16:00 Matrix: Ground Water Date Received: 03/05/19 10:05 Method: 8270D SIM -Semivolatile Organic Compound (GC/MS SIM LL) (Continued) Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac NU Terphenyl-d14(Surr) 56 10.136 03/05/19 13:56 03/06/19 13:55 10 6 Method: WI-GRO -Wisconsin -Gasoline Range Organics (GC) Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Wisconsin GRO <100 100 ug/L 03/07/19 18:04 1 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 87 80-120 03/07/19 18:04 1 Method:WI-DRO-Wisconsin -Diesel Range Organics (GC) -Silica Gel Cleanup Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Diesel Range Organics(DRO) <0.128 0.128 mg/L 03/05/19 13:55 03/07/19 13:16 1 Method: 6020B -Metals (ICP/MS) - Dissolved Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Arsenic <0.00200 0.00200 mg/L 03/06/19 08:13 03/12/19 13:29 1 Barium 0.360 0.00200 mg/L 03/06/19 08:13 03/12/19 13:29 1: =` Cadmium <0.000500 0.000500 mg/L 03/06/19 08:13 03/12/19 13:29 1 Chromium <0.00500 0.00500 mg/L 03/06/19 08:13 03/12/19 13:29 1 Lead <0.000500 0.000500 mg/L 03/06/19 08:13 03/12/19 13:29 1 Selenium <0.00500 0.00500 mg/L 03/06/19 08:13 03/12/19 13:29 1 Silver <0.00100 0.00100 mg/L 03/06/19 08:13 03/12/19 13:29 1 Method: 7470A -Mercury (CVAA) -Dissolved Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Mercury <0.000200 0.000200 mg/L 03/06/19 09:20 03/07/19 15:28 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 31 of 73 3/12/2019 Definitions/Glossary Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Qualifiers GC/MS VOA Qualifier Qualifier Description X Surrogate is outside control limits ); GC/MS Semi VOA Qualifier Qualifier Description Fl MS and/or MSD Recovery is outside acceptance limits. F2 MS/MSD RPD exceeds control limits X Surrogate is outside control limits 4 MS,MSD:The analyte present in the original sample is greater than 4 times the matrix spike concentration;therefore,control limits are not applicable. RPD of the LCS and LCSD exceeds the control limits GC VOA Qualifier Qualifier Description X Surrogate is outside control limits GC Semi VOA Qualifier Qualifier Description X Surrogate is outside control limits Metals Qualifier Qualifier Description Fl MS and/or MSD Recovery is outside acceptance limits. Glossary Abbreviation These commonly used abbreviations may or may not be present in this report. a Listed under the"D"column to designate that the result is reported on a dry weight basis %R Percent Recovery CFL Contains Free Liquid CNF Contains No Free Liquid DER Duplicate Error Ratio(normalized absolute difference) Dil Fac Dilution Factor DL Detection Limit(DoD/DOE) DL,RA,RE,IN Indicates a Dilution,Re-analysis,Re-extraction,or additional Initial metals/anion analysis of the sample DLC Decision Level Concentration(Radiochemistry) EDL Estimated Detection Limit(Dioxin) LOD Limit of Detection(DoD/DOE) LOQ Limit of Quantitation(DoD/DOE) MDA Minimum Detectable Activity(Radiochemistry) MDC Minimum Detectable Concentration(Radiochemistry) MDL Method Detection Limit ML Minimum Level(Dioxin) NC Not Calculated ND Not Detected at the reporting limit(or MDL or EDL if shown) PQL Practical Quantitation Limit QC Quality Control RER Relative Error Ratio(Radiochemistry) RL Reporting Limit or Requested Limit(Radiochemistry) RPD Relative Percent Difference,a measure of the relative difference between two points TEF Toxicity Equivalent Factor(Dioxin) TEQ Toxicity Equivalent Quotient(Dioxin) TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 32 of 73 3/12/2019 Surrogate Summary Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Vlethod: 8260B - Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Matrix: Ground Water Prep Type: Total/NA Percent Surrogate Recovery(Acceptance Limits) BFB DBFM TOL :; Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (80-120) (80-120) (80-120) 310-150364-8 B-10 95 105 106 310-150364-8 B-10 99 113 105 Surrogate Legend BFB=4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) DBFM=Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) 8 TOL=Toluene-d8(Surr) v Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Matrix: Soil Prep Type: Total/NA Percent Surrogate Recovery(Acceptance Limits) BFB DBFM TOL Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (80-120) (80-120) (80-120) 310-150364-1 Trip Blank 96 93 99 310-150364-2 B-6 22.5-25' 99 91 99 310-150364-2 B-6 22.5-25' 97 95 98 310-150364-3 B-7 5-10' 94 93 97 t 310-150364-4 B-7 15-20' 97 92 96 310-150364-4 B-7 15-20' 99 91 98 310-150364-5 B-815-17.5' 98 93 98 310-150364-6 B-9 9-10' 96 94 99 310-150364-7 B-10 0-5' 96 94 98 Surrogate Legend BFB=4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) DBFM=Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) TOL=Toluene-d8(Surr) Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Percent Surrogate Recovery(Acceptance Limits) BFB DBFM TOL Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (80-120) (80-120) (80-120) LCS 310-231646/2-A Lab Control Sample 100 97 101 LCS 310-231748/2-A Lab Control Sample 97 97 97 MB 310-231646/1-A Method Blank 99 91 98 MB 310-231748/1-A Method Blank 95 94 97 Surrogate Legend BFB=4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) DBFM=Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) TOL=Toluene-d8(Surr) TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 33 of 73 3/12/2019 Surrogate Summary Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA Percent Surrogate Recovery(Acceptance Limits) BFB DBFM TOL ) Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (80-120) (80-120) (80-120) LCS 310-231408/6 Lab Control Sample 103 96 103 LCS 310-231408/7 Lab Control Sample 96 111 106 LCS 310-231411/6 Lab Control Sample 98 115 103 LCS 310-231411/7 Lab Control Sample 97 124 X 101 MB 310-231408/8 Method Blank 98 106 100 MB 310-231411/8 Method Blank 97 120 105 8 Surrogate Legend BFB=4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) DBFM=Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) TOL=Toluene-d8(Surr) Method: 8270D SIM - Semivolatile Organic Compound (GC/MS SIM LL) Matrix: Ground Water Prep Type: Total/NA Percent Surrogate Recovery(Acceptance Limits) c; . FBP NBZ TPHL ;i Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (22-110) (17-116) (10-136) 310-150364-8 B-10 80 69 56 Surrogate Legend FBP=2-Fluorobiphenyl(Surr) NBZ=Nitrobenzene-d5(Surr) TPHL=Terphenyl-d14(Surr) Method: 8270D SIM - Semivolatile Organic Compound (GC/MS SIM LL) Matrix: Soil Prep Type: Total/NA Percent Surrogate Recovery(Acceptance Limits) FBP NBZ TPHL Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (28-110) (22-110) (26-110) 310-150364-2 B-6 22.5-25' 63 127 X 50 310-150364-2 MS B-6 22.5-25' 56 119 X 46 310-150364-2 MSD B-6 22.5-25' 65 128 X 54 310-150364-3 B-7 5-10' 88 192 X 141 X 310-150364-4 B-7 15-20' 70 138 X 59 310-150364-5 B-8 15-17.5' 73 86 70 310-150364-6 B-9 9-10' 81 103 64 310-150364-7 B-10 0-5' 78 77 61 Surrogate Legend FBP=2-Fluorobiphenyl(Surr) NBZ=Nitrobenzene-d5(Surr) TPHL=Terphenyl-d14(Surr) TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 34 of 73 3/12/2019 Surrogate Summary Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: 8270D SIM - Semivolatile Organic Compound (GC/MS SIM LL) Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Percent Surrogate Recovery(Acceptance Limits) FBP NBZ TPHL Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (28-110) (22-110) (26-110) !°; , LCS 310-231608/2-A Lab Control Sample 62 64 62 MB 310-231608/1-A Method Blank 53 58 56 Surrogate Legend FBP=2-Fluorobiphenyl(Surr) NBZ=Nitrobenzene-d5(Surr) Q TPHL=Terphenyl-d14(Surr) v Method: 8270D SIM - Semivolatile Organic Compound (GC/MS SIM LL) Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA Percent Surrogate Recovery(Acceptance Limits) FBP NBZ TPHL Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (22-110) (17-116) (10-136) LCS 310-231616/2A Lab Control Sample 77 71 76 LCSD 310-231616/3-A Lab Control Sample Dup 75 73 55 MB 310-231616/1-A Method Blank 75 73 71 , Surrogate Legend FBP=2-Fluorobiphenyl(Surr) NBZ=Nitrobenzene-d5(Surr) TPHL=Terphenyl-d14(Surr) Method: WI-GRO -Wisconsin - Gasoline Range Organics (GC) Matrix: Ground Water Prep Type: Total/NA Percent Surrogate Recovery(Acceptance Limits) BFB Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (80-120) 310-150364-8 B-10 87 - Surrogate Legend BFB=4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) Method: WI-GRO - Wisconsin - Gasoline Range Organics (GC) Matrix: Soil Prep Type: Total/NA Percent Surrogate Recovery(Acceptance Limits) BFB Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (80-120) 310-150364-1 Trip Blank 96 310-150364-2 B-6 22.5-25' 76 X 310-150364-3 B-7 5-10' 84 310-150364-4 B-7 15-20' 102 310-150364-5 B-8 15-17.5' 94 310-150364-6 B-9 9-10' 94 310-150364-7 8-10 0-5' 88 Surrogate Legend BFB=4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 35 of 73 3/12/2019 Surrogate Summary Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: WI-GRO -Wisconsin - Gasoline Range Organics (GC) Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Percent Surrogate Recovery(Acceptance Limits) BFB '}` Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (80-120) LCS 310-231611/2-A Lab Control Sample 106 LCSD 310-231611/25-A Lab Control Sample Dup 107 MB 310-231611/1-A Method Blank 99 Surrogate Legend BFB=4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 8 Method: WI-GRO -Wisconsin - Gasoline Range Organics (GC) Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA Percent Surrogate Recovery(Acceptance Limits) BFB Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (80-120) LCS 310-231812/6 Lab Control Sample 106 LCSD 310-231812/26 Lab Control Sample Dup 107 MB 310-231812/5 Method Blank 84 Surrogate Legend BFB=4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) Method: 8082A - Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) by Gas Chromatography Matrix: Soil Prep Type: Total/NA Percent Surrogate Recovery(Acceptance Limits) DCB1 TCX1 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID (10-110) (10-110) 310-150364-2 B-6 22.5-25' 38 57 310-150364-3 B-7 5-10' 8 X 92 310-150364-4 B-7 15-20' 42 52 310-150364-5 B-8 15-17.5' 67 119 X 310-150364-6 B-9 9-10' 59 42 310-150364-7 B-10 0-5' 71 71 Surrogate Legend DCB=DCB Decachlorobiphenyl(Surr) TCX=Tetrachloro-m-xylene TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 36 of 73 3/12/2019 QC Sample Results Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 IAethod: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) Lab Sample ID: MB 310-231408/8 Client Sample ID: Method Blank Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231408 .; MB MB _t X13 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac , Acetone <10.0 10.0 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 Allyl chloride <2.00 2.00 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 Benzene <0.500 0.500 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 Bromobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 Bromochloromethane <5.00 5.00 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 Bromoform <5.00 5.00 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 2-Butanone(MEK) <10.0 10.0 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 9 n-Butylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 sec-Butylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 tert-Butylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 Carbon tetrachloride <2.00 2.00 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 Chlorobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 Chlorodibromomethane <5.00 5.00 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 Dichlorofluoromethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 Chloroethane <4.00 4.00 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 Chloroform <3.00 3.00 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 Chloromethane <3.00 3.00 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 2-Chlorotoluene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <5.00 5.00 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane <3.00 3.00 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 1,2-Dichloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 1,1-Dichloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 1,1-Dichloroethene <2.00 2.00 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 1,2-Dichloropropane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 1,3-Dichloropropane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 2,2-Dichloropropane <4.00 4.00 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 1,1-Dichloropropene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 Diethyl ether <2.00 2.00 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 Ethylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 Hexachlorobutadiene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 lsopropylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 p-Isopropyltoluene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) <10.0 10.0 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 Methylene Chloride <5.00 5.00 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 Methyl tert-butyl ether <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 Naphthalene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 N-Propylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 Styrene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 37 of 73 3/12/2019 QC Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Lab Sample ID: MB 310-231408/8 Client Sample ID: Method Blank Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231408 MB MB ,,,,,N Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Tetrachloroethene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 Tetrahydrofuran <10.0 10.0 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 Toluene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 03/06/1907:56 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <5.00 5.00 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 9 Trichloroethene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 Trichlorofluoromethane <4.00 4.00 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane <2.00 2.00 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 Vinyl chloride <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 Xylenes,Total <3.00 3.00 ug/L 03/06/19 07:56 1 MB MB Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 98 80-120 03/06/19 07:56 1 Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) 106 80-120 03/06/19 07:56 1 Toluene-d8(Surr) 100 80-120 03/06/19 07:56 1 Lab Sample ID: LCS 310-231408/6 Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231408 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Acetone 40.0 36.83 ug/L 92 50-150 Allyl chloride 20.0 20.06 ug/L 100 50-150 Benzene 20.0 21.62 ug/L 108 77_120 Bromobenzene 20.0 20.44 ug/L 102 70-120 Bromochloromethane 20.0 21.54 ug/L 108 73-132 Bromoform 20.0 15.71 ug/L 79 57-120 2-Butanone(MEK) 40.0 34.83 ug/L 87 50-150 n-Butylbenzene 20.0 22.17 ug/L 111 63-120 sec-Butylbenzene 20.0 21.63 ug/L 108 64-120 tert-Butylbenzene 20.0 20.71 ug/L 104 64-120 Carbon tetrachloride 20.0 19.50 ug/L 98 72-126 Chlorobenzene 20.0 22.57 ug/L 113 74-120 Chlorodibromomethane 20.0 17.60 ug/L 88 66-120 Chloroform 20.0 21.08 ug/L 105 78-121 2-Chlorotoluene 20.0 21.25 ug/L 106 71-120 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 20.0 18.90 ug/L 95 50-150 1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) 20.0 19.95 ug/L 100 71_125 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 20.0 21.22 ug/L 106 66-120 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 20.0 21.57 ug/L 108 67-120 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 20.0 21.69 ug/L 108 68-120 1,2-Dichloroethane 20.0 20.89 ug/L 104 75-123 1,1-Dichloroethane 20.0 20.10 ug/L 100 75-125 1,1-Dichloroethene 20.0 20.72 ug/L 104 75-124 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 38 of 73 3/12/2019 QC Sample Resultst,, gym: Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Lab Sample ID: LCS 310-231408/6 Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231408 3 r Spike LCS LCS %Rec. €`,;, Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 20.0 21.91 ug/L 110 77-120 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 20.0 20.33 ug/L 102 75-122 1,2-Dichloropropane 20.0 21.00 ug/L 105 75-123 1,3-Dichloropropane 20.0 21.71 ug/L 109 75-123 2,2-Dichloropropane 20.0 20.79 ug/L 104 50-150 1,1-Dichloropropene 20.0 22.35 ug/L 112 77.124 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 20.0 20.51 ug/L 103 70-120 9 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 20.0 17.34 ug/L 87 69-120 Diethyl ether 20.0 19.07 ug/L 95 71_122 Ethylbenzene 20.0 21.78 ug/L 109 73-120 Hexachlorobutadiene 20.0 20.23 ug/L 101 50-150 lsopropylbenzene 20.0 21.52 ug/L 108 69-120 p-Isopropyltoluene 20.0 21.42 ug/L 107 68-120 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) 40.0 36.33 ug/L 91 59-126 Methylene Chloride 20.0 20.84 ug/L 104 50-150 .- Methyl tert-butyl ether 20.0 20.94 ug/L 105 72-121 `' Naphthalene 20.0 20.91 ug/L 105 50-150 N-Propylbenzene 20.0 21.67 ug/L 108 70-120 Styrene 20.0 21.39 ug/L 107 70-120 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 20.0 20.06 ug/L 100 72-120 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 20.0 19.97 ug/L 100 63-122 Tetrachloroethene 20.0 20.03 ug/L 100 72-129 Tetrahydrofuran 40.0 43.71 ug/L 109 63-128 Toluene 20.0 20.96 ug/L 105 74-120 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 20.0 19.26 ug/L 96 50-150 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 20.0 19.25 ug/L 96 59-120 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 20.0 19.87 ug/L 99 76-127 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 20.0 21.75 ug/L 109 69-127 Trichloroethene 20.0 21.30 ug/L 107 77-123 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane 20.0 21.83 ug/L 109 76-131 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 20.0 22.15 ug/L 111 67.120 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 20.0 22.24 ug/L 111 68-120 Xylenes,Total 40.0 43.37 ug/L 108 69-120 LCS LCS Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 103 80-120 Dibromofluoromethane(Sun) 96 80-120 Toluene-d8(Surr) 103 80-120 Lab Sample ID: LCS 310-231408/7 Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231408 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Dichlorofluoromethane 20.0 20.56 ug/L 103 70.131 Chloroethane 20.0 20.80 ug/L 104 69-129 Chloromethane 20.0 18.34 ug/L 92 50-150 Dichlorodifluoromethane 20.0 25.40 ug/L 127 50-150 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 39 of 73 3/12/2019 QC Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Lab Sample ID: LCS 310-231408/7 Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231408 .7,-0 Spike LCS LCS 0/Rec. `# Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Trichlorofluoromethane 20.0 21.33 ug/L 107 68-146 Vinyl chloride 20.0 21.92 ug/L 110 67-133 LCS LCS Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 96 80-120 Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) 111 80-120 Toluene-d8(Surr) 106 80-120 Lab Sample ID: MB 310-231411/8 Client Sample ID: Method Blank Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231411 MB MB Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed DiI Fac Bromodichloromethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 08:12 1 Bromomethane <4.00 4.00 ug/L 03/06/19 08:12 1 4-Chlorotoluene <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 08:12 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 08:12 1 Dibromomethane <1.00 1.00 ug/L 03/06/19 08:12 1 MB MB Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 97 80-120 03/06/19 08:12 1 Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) 120 80-120 03/06/19 08:12 1 Toluene-d8(Surr) 105 80-120 03/06/19 08:12 1 Lab Sample ID: LCS 310-231411/6 Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231411 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Bromodichloromethane 20.0 20.30 ug/L 102 73-120 4-Chlorotoluene 20.0 19.39 ug/L 97 71-120 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 20.0 22.57 ug/L 113 66-120 Dibromomethane 20.0 22.48 ug/L 112 76-125 LCS LCS Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 98 80-120 Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) 115 80-120 Toluene-d8(Surr) 103 80-120 Lab Sample ID: LCS 310-231411/7 Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231411 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Bromomethane 20.0 18.61 ug/L 93 38-150 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 40 of 73 3/12/2019 QC Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Lab Sample ID: LCS 310-231411/7 Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231411 LCS LCS ,4 l;" Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 97 80-120 Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) 124 X 80-120 Toluene-d8(Surr) 101 80-120 Lab Sample ID: MB 310-231646/1-A Client Sample ID: Method Blank Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231648 Prep Batch: 231646 9 MB MB Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Acetone <0.477 0.477 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 Allyl chloride <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 Benzene <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 Bromobenzene <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 Bromochloromethane <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 Bromodichloromethane <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 Bromoform <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 Bromomethane <0.477 0.477 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 2-Butanone(MEK) <0.239 0.239 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 n-Butylbenzene <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 sec-Butylbenzene <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 tert-Butylbenzene <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 Carbon tetrachloride <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 Chlorobenzene <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 Chlorodibromomethane <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 Dichlorofluoromethane <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 Chloroethane <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 Chloroform <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 Chloromethane <0.239 0.239 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 4-Chlorotoluene <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 2-Chlorotoluene <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 1,2-Dichloroethane <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 1,1-Dichloroethane <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 1,1-Dichloroethene <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 1,2-Dichloropropane <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 1,3-Dichloropropane <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 2,2-Dichloropropane <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 1,1-Dichloropropene <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 Diethyl ether <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 41 of 73 3/12/2019 QC Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Lab Sample ID: MB 310-231646/1-A Client Sample ID: Method Blank Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231648 Prep Batch: 231646 MB MB Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Ethylbenzene <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 Hexachlorobutadiene <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 lsopropylbenzene <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 p-Isopropyltoluene <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 Methylene Chloride <0.239 0.239 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 Methyl tert-butyl ether <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 9 Naphthalene <0.239 0.239 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 N-Propylbenzene <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 Styrene <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 Tetrachloroethene <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 Tetrahydrofuran <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 Toluene <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 y' • 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 Trichloroethene <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 Trichlorofluoromethane <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.1434 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 Vinyl chloride <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 Xylenes,Total <0.143 0.143 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 Dibromomethane <0.0955 0.0955 mg/Kg 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 MB MB Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 99 80-120 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) 91 80-120 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 Toluene-d8(Surr) 98 80-120 03/06/19 05:47 03/06/19 08:37 1 Lab Sample ID: LCS 310-231646/2-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231648 Prep Batch: 231646 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Acetone 1.90 2.002 mg/Kg 106 42-150 Allyl chloride 0.948 0.9984 mg/Kg 105 50-150 Benzene 0.948 1.040 mg/Kg 110 75-147 Bromobenzene 0.948 0.9585 mg/Kg 101 77-132 Bromochloromethane 0.948 0.9773 mg/Kg 103 72-150 Bromodichloromethane 0.948 0.9471 mg/Kg 100 74-144 Bromoform 0.948 0.9138 mg/Kg 96 74-124 2-Butanone(MEK) 1.90 2.157 mg/Kg 114 50-150 n-Butylbenzene 0.948 1.041 mg/Kg 110 73-131 TestAmerica Cedar Falls • Page 42 of 73 3/12/2019 QC Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Lab Sample ID: LCS 310-231646/2-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231648 Prep Batch: 231646 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits sec-Butylbenzene 0.948 1.015 mg/Kg 107 72-129 tert-Butylbenzene 0.948 1.024 mg/Kg 108 73-128 Carbon tetrachloride 0.948 0.9301 mg/Kg 98 70-144 Chlorobenzene 0.948 0.9914 mg/Kg 105 78-132 Chlorodibromomethane 0.948 0.9809 mg/Kg 103 77.132 Chloroform 0.948 0.9476 mg/Kg 100 69.148 4-Chlorotoluene 0.948 1.033 mg/Kg 109 74-130 9 2-Chlorotoluene 0.948 1.041 mg/Kg 110 72.132 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 0.948 0.8541 mg/Kg 90 50-150 1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) 0.948 0.9856 mg/Kg 104 80-134 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.948 1.022 mg/Kg 108 76-127 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.948 1.011 mg/Kg 107 76-126 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.948 1.009 mg/Kg 106 75-126 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.948 1.052 mg/Kg 111 74-148 1,1-Dichloroethane 0.948 1.019 mg/Kg 107 74-150 1,1-Dichloroethene 0.948 1.003 mg/Kg 106 74-139 ..'` cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.948 1.001 mg/Kg 106 74-148 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.948 1.017 mg/Kg 107 76-139 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.948 1.060 mg/Kg 112 74.150 1,3-Dichloropropane 0.948 1.019 mg/Kg 107 80-136 2,2-Dichloropropane 0.948 1.023 mg/Kg 108 50-150 1,1-Dichloropropene 0.948 1.024 mg/Kg 108 73-144 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.948 0.9198 mg/Kg 97 78.138 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.948 1.055 mg/Kg 111 77.138 Diethyl ether 0.948 1.018 mg/Kg 107 73-150 Ethylbenzene 0.948 0.9877 mg/Kg 104 78-131 Hexachlorobutadiene 0.948 1.007 mg/Kg 106 50-150 lsopropylbenzene 0.948 0.9840 mg/Kg 104 77-130 p-lsopropyltoluene 0.948 1.013 mg/Kg 107 73-128 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) 1.90 1.810 mg/Kg 95 64.150 Methylene Chloride 0.948 1.038 mg/Kg 109 50-150 Methyl tert-butyl ether 0.948 1.009 mg/Kg 106 79-146 Naphthalene 0.948 0.9467 mg/Kg 100 50-150 N-Propylbenzene 0.948 1.010 mg/Kg 106 77-132 Styrene 0.948 0.9966 mg/Kg 105 75-138 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.948 0.9576 mg/Kg 101 78-133 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.948 1.021 mg/Kg 108 78.141 Tetrachloroethene 0.948 1.004 mg/Kg 106 77-127 Tetrahydrofuran 1.90 2.230 mg/Kg 118 75-149 Toluene 0.948 0.9860 mg/Kg 104 77.134 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 0.948 0.9517 mg/Kg 100 50-150 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.948 0.9722 mg/Kg 103 65-133 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.948 0.9340 mg/Kg 98 74.144 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.948 1.003 mg/Kg 106 80-137 Trichloroethene 0.948 0.9966 mg/Kg 105 75-142 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 0.948 0.9392 mg/Kg 99 77-141 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane 0.948 0.9916 mg/Kg 105 75.138 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.948 1.034 mg/Kg 109 71-134 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 43 of 73 3/12/2019 QC Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: 82608 -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Lab Sample ID: LCS 310-231646/2-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231648 Prep Batch: 231646 < Spike LCS LCS %Rec. * `i Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.948 1.031 mg/Kg 109 72-132 Xylenes,Total 1.90 1.971 mg/Kg 104 76.132 Dibromomethane 0.948 1.028 mg/Kg 108 76-148 LCS LCS Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 100 80-120 Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) 97 80-120 Toluene-d8(Surr) 101 80-120 Lab Sample ID: MB 310-231748/1-A Client Sample ID: Method Blank Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231750 Prep Batch: 231748 MB MB Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Acetone <0.479 0.479 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 Allyl chloride <0.0959 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 Benzene <0.0959 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 Bromobenzene <0.0959 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 Bromochloromethane <0.0959 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 Bromodichloromethane <0.0959 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 Bromoform <0.0959 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 Bromomethane <0.479 0.479 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 2-Butanone(MEK) <0.240 0.240 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 n-Butylbenzene <0.0959 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 sec-Butylbenzene <0.0959 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 tert-Butylbenzene <0.0959 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 Carbon tetrachloride <0.0959 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 Chlorobenzene <0.0959 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 Chlorodibromomethane <0.0959 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 Dichlorofluoromethane <0.0959 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 Chloroethane 0.1027 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 Chloroform <0.0959 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 Chloromethane <0.240 0.240 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 4-Chlorotoluene <0.0959 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 2-Chlorotoluene <0.0959 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane <0.240 0.240 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) <0.0959 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 1,2-Dichlorobenzene <0.0959 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 1,3-Dichlorobenzene <0.0959 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 1,4-Dichlorobenzene <0.0959 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 Dichlorodifluoromethane <0.0959 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 1,2-Dichloroethane <0.0959 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 1,1-Dichloroethane <0.0959 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 1,1-Dichloroethene <0.0959 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.0959 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene <0.0959 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 1,2-Dichloropropane <0.0959 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 1,3-Dichloropropane <0.0959 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 44 of 73 3/12/2019 QC Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Lab Sample ID: MB 310-231748/1-A Client Sample ID: Method Blank Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231750 Prep Batch: 231748 MB MB Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 2,2-Dichloropropane <0.0959 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 1,1-Dichloropropene <0.0959 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.0959 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene <0.0959 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 Diethyl ether <0.0959 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 Ethylbenzene <0.0959 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 Hexachlorobutadiene <0.0959 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 9 Isopropylbenzene <0.0959 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 p-Isopropyltoluene <0.0959 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) <0.0959 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 Methylene Chloride <0.240 0.240 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 Methyl tert-butyl ether <0.0959 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 Naphthalene <0.240 0.240 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 N-Propylbenzene <0.0959 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 Styrene <0.0959 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.0959 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.0959 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 Tetrachloroethene <0.0959 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 Tetrahydrofuran <0.0959 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 Toluene <0.0959 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <0.0959 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <0.0959 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane <0.0959 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 1,1,2-Trichloroethane <0.0959 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 Trichloroethene <0.0959 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 Trichlorofluoromethane <0.0959 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 1,2,3-Trichloropropane <0.0959 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane <0.0959 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <0.0959 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <0.0959 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 Vinyl chloride <0.0959 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 Xylenes,Total <0.144 0.144 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 Dibromomethane <0.0959 0.0959 mg/Kg 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 MB MB Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 95 80-120 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) 94 80-120 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 Toluene-d8(Surr) 97 80-120 03/07/19 05:38 03/07/19 08:23 1 Lab Sample ID: LCS 310-231748/2-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231750 Prep Batch: 231748 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Acetone 1.91 1.616 mg/Kg 85 42.150 Allyl chloride 0.955 1.022 mg/Kg 107 50-150 Benzene 0.955 1.042 mg/Kg 109 75-147 Bromobenzene 0.955 0.9483 mg/Kg 99 77-132 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 45 of 73 3/12/2019 QC Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: 82608 -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Lab Sample ID: LCS 310-231748/2-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231750 Prep Batch: 231748 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Bromochloromethane 0.955 0.9659 mg/Kg 101 72-150 Bromodichloromethane 0.955 0.9222 mg/Kg 97 74-144 Bromoform 0.955 0.8383 mg/Kg 88 74-124 2-Butanone(MEK) 1.91 1.444 mg/Kg 76 50-150 n-Butylbenzene 0.955 1.014 mg/Kg 106 73-131 sec-Butylbenzene 0.955 0.9915 mg/Kg 104 72.129 tert-Butylbenzene 0.955 0.9736 mg/Kg 102 73-128 9 Carbon tetrachloride 0.955 0.9438 mg/Kg 99 70-144 Chlorobenzene 0.955 0.9619 mg/Kg 101 78-132 Chlorodibromomethane 0.955 0.9506 mg/Kg 100 77-132 Chloroform 0.955 0.9428 mg/Kg 99 69-148 4-Chlorotoluene 0.955 0.9756 mg/Kg 102 74-130 2-Chlorotoluene 0.955 1.010 mg/Kg 106 72-132 1,2-Dibromo-3-Chloropropane 0.955 0.7343 mg/Kg 77 50-150 1,2-Dibromoethane(EDB) 0.955 0.9194 mg/Kg 96 80-134 1,2-Dichlorobenzene 0.955 0.9704 mg/Kg 102 76-127 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 0.955 0.9731 mg/Kg 102 76-126 1,4-Dichlorobenzene 0.955 0.9787 mg/Kg 103 75-126 1,2-Dichloroethane 0.955 1.010 mg/Kg 106 74-148 1,1-Dichloroethane 0.955 1.053 mg/Kg 110 74-150 1,1-Dichloroethene 0.955 1.019 mg/Kg 107 74-139 cis-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.955 1.005 mg/Kg 105 74-148 trans-1,2-Dichloroethene 0.955 1.012 mg/Kg 106 76-139 1,2-Dichloropropane 0.955 1.064 mg/Kg 111 74-150 1,3-Dichloropropane 0.955 0.9429 mg/Kg 99 80-136 2,2-Dichloropropane 0.955 1.023 mg/Kg 107 50-150 1,1-Dichloropropene 0.955 1.032 mg/Kg 108 73-144 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.955 0.8882 mg/Kg 93 78-138 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene 0.955 1.029 mg/Kg 108 77-138 Diethyl ether 0.955 0.9894 mg/Kg 104 73-150 Ethylbenzene 0.955 0.9798 mg/Kg 103 78-131 Hexachlorobutadiene 0.955 1.052 mg/Kg 110 50-150 Isopropylbenzene 0.955 0.9698 mg/Kg 102 77-130 p-Isopropyltoluene 0.955 0.9849 mg/Kg 103 73-128 4-Methyl-2-pentanone(MIBK) 1.91 1.579 mg/Kg 83 64-150 Methylene Chloride 0.955 1.009 mg/Kg 106 50-150 Methyl tert-butyl ether 0.955 0.8935 mg/Kg 94 79-146 Naphthalene 0.955 0.8430 mg/Kg 88 50-150 N-Propylbenzene 0.955 0.9825 mg/Kg 103 77-132 Styrene 0.955 0.9807 mg/Kg 103 75-138 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.955 0.9165 mg/Kg 96 78-133 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.955 0.9090 mg/Kg 95 78-141 Tetrachloroethene 0.955 1.000 mg/Kg 105 77-127 Tetrahydrofuran 1.91 1.851 mg/Kg 97 75-149 Toluene 0.955 0.9773 mg/Kg 102 77-134 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 0.955 0.9125 mg/Kg 96 50-150 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.955 0.9346 mg/Kg 98 65-133 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.955 0.9644 mg/Kg 101 74-144 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 46 of 73 3/12/2019 QC Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Vlethod: 8260B -Volatile Organic Compounds (GC/MS) (Continued) Lab Sample ID: LCS 310-231748/2-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231750 Prep Batch: 231748 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. . Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 0.955 0.9418 mg/Kg 99 80-137 Trichloroethene 0.955 1.037 mg/Kg 109 75-142 1,2,3-Trichloropropane 0.955 0.8966 mg/Kg 94 77-141 1,1,2-Trichlorotrifluoroethane 0.955 1.043 mg/Kg 109 75-138 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.955 1.054 mg/Kg 110 71-134 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.955 0.9998 mg/Kg 105 72-132 Xylenes,Total 1.91 2.001 mg/Kg 105 76-132 9 Dibromomethane 0.955 1.002 mg/Kg 105 76-148 LCS LCS Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 97 80-120 Dibromofluoromethane(Surr) 97 80-120 Toluene-d8(Surr) 97 80-120 Method: 8270D SIM - Semivolatile Organic Compound (GC/MS SIM LL) Lab Sample ID: MB 310-231608/1-A Client Sample ID: Method Blank Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231817 Prep Batch: 231608 MB MB Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Acenaphthene <0.00980 0.00980 mg/Kg 03/05/19 13:33 03/07/19 14:42 1 Acenaphthylene <0.00980 0.00980 mg/Kg 03/05/19 13:33 03/07/19 14:42 1 Anthracene <0.00980 0.00980 mg/Kg 03/05/19 13:33 03/07/19 14:42 1 Benzo[a]anthracene <0.00980 0.00980 mg/Kg 03/05/19 13:33 03/07/19 14:42 1 Benzo[a]pyrene <0.00980 0.00980 mg/Kg 03/05/19 13:33 03/07/19 14:42 1 Benzo[b]fluoranthene <0.00980 0.00980 mg/Kg 03/05/19 13:33 03/07/19 14:42 1 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene <0.00980 0.00980 mg/Kg 03/05/19 13:33 03/07/19 14:42 1 Benzo[k]fluoranthene <0.00980 0.00980 mg/Kg 03/05/19 13:33 03/07/19 14:42 1 Chrysene <0.00980 0.00980 mg/Kg 03/05/19 13:33 03/07/19 14:42 1 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene <0.00980 0.00980 mg/Kg 03/05/19 13:33 03/07/19 14:42 1 Fluoranthene <0.00980 0.00980 mg/Kg 03/05/19 13:33 03/07/19 14:42 1 Fluorene <0.00980 0.00980 mg/Kg 03/05/19 13:33 03/07/19 14:42 1 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene <0.00980 0.00980 mg/Kg 03/05/19 13:33 03/07/19 14:42 1 2-Methylnaphthalene <0.00980 0.00980 mg/Kg 03/05/19 13:33 03/07/19 14:42 1 Naphthalene <0.00980 0.00980 mg/Kg 03/05/19 13:33 03/07/19 14:42 1 Phenanthrene <0.00980 0.00980 mg/Kg 03/05/19 13:33 03/07/19 14:42 1 Pyrene <0.00980 0.00980 mg/Kg 03/05/19 13:33 03/07/19 14:42 1 MB MB Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 2-Fluorobiphenyl(Surr) 53 28-110 03/05/19 13:33 03/07/19 14:42 1 Nitrobenzene-d5(Surr) 58 22-110 03/05/19 13:33 03/07/19 14:42 1 Terphenyl-d14(Surr) 56 26-110 03/05/19 13:33 03/07/19 14:42 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 47 of 73 3/12/2019 QC Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: 8270D SIM - Semivolatile Organic Compound (GC/MS SIM LL) (Continued) Lab Sample ID: LCS 310-231608/2-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231943 Prep Batch: 231608 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Acenaphthene 0.132 0.08276 mg/Kg 63 35-110 Acenaphthylene 0.132 0.08078 mg/Kg 61 33-110 Anthracene 0.132 0.08432 mg/Kg 64 37-110 Benzo[a]anthracene 0.132 0.08493 mg/Kg 65 35-110 Benzo[a]pyrene 0.132 0.08403 mg/Kg 64 36-110 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.132 0.08756 mg/Kg 67 33-110 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 0.132 0.08737 mg/Kg 66 15-110 9 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 0.132 0.08388 mg/Kg 64 37-110 Chrysene 0.132 0.08455 mg/Kg 64 27-110 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 0.132 0.08817 mg/Kg 67 22-116 Fluoranthene 0.132 0.08223 mg/Kg 63 35-110 Fluorene 0.132 0.08555 mg/Kg 65 32-110 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 0.132 0.08093 mg/Kg 62 30-110 2-Methylnaphthalene 0.132 0.08248 mg/Kg 63 27.110 Naphthalene 0.132 0.08355 mg/Kg 64 24-110 Phenanthrene 0.132 0.08283 mg/Kg 63 37-110 T Pyrene 0.132 0.08064 mg/Kg 61 34-110 LCS LCS Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits 2-Fluorobiphenyl(Surr) 62 28-110 Nitrobenzene-d5(Surr) 64 22-110 Terphenyl-d14(Surr) 62 26-110 Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-2 MS Client Sample ID: B-6 22.5-25' Matrix: Soil Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231711 Prep Batch: 231608 Sample Sample Spike MS MS %Rec. Analyte Result Qualifier Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Acenaphthene <0.137 Fl 0.187 0.3352 Fl mg/Kg a 113 30-110 Acenaphthylene <0.137 0.187 0.1441 mg/Kg * 77 30-110 Anthracene <0.137 Fl F2 0.187 0.3544 Fl mg/Kg * 125 23-116 Benzo[a]anthracene 0.237 Fl F2 0.187 0.4653 Fl mg/Kg * 122 27-110 Benzo[a]pyrene 0.182 Fl F2 0.187 0.3197 mg/Kg * 73 28-110 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.292 Fl F2 0.187 0.4819 mg/Kg * 102 21-117 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene <0.137 0.187 0.1888 mg/Kg * 46 10-114 Benzo[k]fluoranthene <0.137 Fl F2 0.187 0.2196 mg/Kg * 61 27.111 Chrysene 0.370 Fl F2 0.187 0.6448 Fl mg/Kg * 147 20-110 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene <0.137 0.187 <0.140 mg/Kg * 60 10-124 Fluoranthene 0.829 F2 0.187 1.274 4 mg/Kg * 238 17-122 Fluorene 0.163 Fl 0.187 0.3455 mg/Kg * 98 25-110 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene <0.137 Fl F2 0.187 0.1895 mg/Kg * 61 21-115 2-Methylnaphthalene 0.192 0.187 0.3461 mg/Kg * 82 27-110 Naphthalene 0.922 0.187 1.257 4 mg/Kg * 179 24-110 Phenanthrene 0.785 F2 0.187 1.070 4 mg/Kg * 152 14-124 Pyrene 0.917 F2 0.187 1.375 4 mg/Kg * 245 17-118 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 48 of 73 3/12/2019 QC Sample Results I, Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: 8270D SIM - Semivolatile Organic Compound (GC/MS SIM LL) (Continued) Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-2 MS Client Sample ID: B-6 22.5-25' Matrix: Soil Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231711 Prep Batch: 231608 :--;A::1 MS MS .;tai Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits 2-Fluorobiphenyl(Surr) 56 28-110 Nitrobenzene-d5(Surr) 119 X 22-110 Terphenyl-d14(Surr) 46 26-110 Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-2 MSD Client Sample ID: B-6 22.5-25' Matrix: Soil Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231711 Prep Batch: 231608 9 Sample Sample Spike MSD MSD %Rec. RPD Analyte Result Qualifier Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits RPD Limit Acenaphthene <0.137 F1 0.191 0.4674 F1 mg/Kg * 180 30-110 33 40 Acenaphthylene <0.137 0.191 0.1600 mg/Kg * 84 30-110 10 40 Anthracene <0.137 F1 F2 0.191 0.6703 F1 F2 mg/Kg * 287 23-116 62 40 Benzo[a]anthracene 0.237 F1 F2 0.191 1.095 F1 F2 mg/Kg * 448 27.110 81 40 Benzo[a]pyrene 0.182 F1 F2 0.191 0.6702 F1 F2 mg/Kg * 255 28-110 71 40 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 0.292 F1 F2 0.191 0.9837 F1 F2 mg/Kg * 362 21-117 68 40 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene <0.137 0.191 0.2568 mg/Kg * 81 10-114 30 40 Benzo[k]fluoranthene <0.137 F1 F2 0.191 0.4649 F1 F2 mg/Kg * 188 27-111 72 40 Chrysene 0.370 F1 F2 0.191 1.147 F1 F2 mg/Kg * 406 20-110 56 40 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene <0.137 0.191 0.1508 mg/Kg * 79 10-124 29 40 Fluoranthene 0.829 F2 0.191 2.827 4 F2 mg/Kg * 1044 17-122 76 40 Fluorene 0.163 F1 0.191 0.4941 Fl mg/Kg * 173 25.110 35 40 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene <0.137 F1 F2 0.191 0.3030 F1 F2 mg/Kg * 119 21-115 46 40 2-Methylnaphthalene 0.192 0.191 0.3725 mg/Kg * 94 27-110 7 40 Naphthalene 0.922 0.191 1.261 4 mg/Kg * 177 24.110 0 40 Phenanthrene 0.785 F2 0.191 2.166 4 F2 mg/Kg * 721 14-124 68 40 Pyrene 0.917 F2 0.191 2.850 4 F2 mg/Kg * 1010 17-118 70 40 MSD MSD Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits 2-Fluorobiphenyl(Surr) 65 28-110 Nitrobenzene-d5(Surr) 128 X 22-110 Terphenyl-d14(Surr) 54 26-110 Lab Sample ID: MB 310-231616/1-A Client Sample ID: Method Blank Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231711 Prep Batch: 231616 MB MB Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Oil Fac Acenaphthene <0.100 0.100 ug/L 03/05/19 13:56 03/06/19 13:00 1 Acenaphthylene <0.100 0.100 ug/L 03/05/19 13:56 03/06/19 13:00 1 Anthracene <0.100 0.100 ug/L 03/05/19 13:56 03/06/19 13:00 1 Benzo[a]anthracene <0.100 0.100 ug/L 03/05/19 13:56 03/06/19 13:00 1 Benzo[a]pyrene <0.100 0.100 ug/L 03/05/19 13:56 03/06/19 13:00 1 Benzo[b]fluoranthene <0.100 0.100 ug/L 03/05/19 13:56 03/06/19 13:00 1 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene <0.100 0.100 ug/L 03/05/19 13:56 03/06/19 13:00 1 Benzo[k]fluoranthene <0.100 0.100 ug/L 03/05/19 13:56 03/06/19 13:00 1 Chrysene <0.100 0.100 ug/L 03/05/19 13:56 03/06/19 13:00 1 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene <0.100 0.100 ug/L 03/05/19 13:56 03/06/19 13:00 1 Fluoranthene <0.100 0.100 ug/L 03/05/19 13:56 03/06/19 13:00 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 49 of 73 3/12/2019 QC Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: 8270D SIM - Semivolatile Organic Compound (GC/MS SIM LL) (Continued) Lab Sample ID: MB 310-231616/1-A Client Sample ID: Method Blank Matrix:Water Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231711 Prep Batch: 231616 ,11 MB MB ? Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Fluorene <0.100 0.100 ug/L 03/05/19 13:56 03/06/19 13:00 1 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene <0.100 0.100 ug/L 03/05/19 13:56 03/06/19 13:00 1 2-Methylnaphthalene <0.100 0.100 ug/L 03/05/19 13:56 03/06/19 13:00 1 Naphthalene <0.500 0.500 ug/L 03/05/19 13:56 03/06/19 13:00 1 Phenanthrene <0.100 0.100 ug/L 03/05/1913:56 03/06/1913:00 1 Pyrene <0.100 0.100 ug/L 03/05/19 13:56 03/06/19 13:00 1 MB MB 9 Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 2-Fluorobiphenyl(Surr) 75 22-110 03/05/19 13:56 03/06/19 13:00 1 Nitrobenzene-d5(Surr) 73 17-116 03/05/19 13:56 03/06/19 13:00 1 Terphenyl-d14(Surr) 71 10-136 03/05/19 13:56 03/06/19 13:00 1 Lab Sample ID: LCS 310-231616/2-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix:Water Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231711 Prep Batch: 231616 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Acenaphthene 2.00 1.521 ug/L 76 34-110 Acenaphthylene 2.00 1.619 ug/L 81 36-110 Anthracene 2.00 1.573 ug/L 79 42-110 Benzo[a]anthracene 2.00 1.495 ug/L 75 37.110 Benzo[a]pyrene 2.00 1.829 ug/L 91 36-111 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 2.00 1.729 ug/L 86 36-112 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 2.00 2.257 ug/L 113 10-122 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 2.00 1.906 ug/L 95 37.110 Chrysene 2.00 1.491 ug/L 75 30-110 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 2.00 1.944 ug/L 97 10-122 Fluoranthene 2.00 1.585 ug/L 79 40-110 Fluorene 2.00 1.541 ug/L 77 30-110 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 2.00 1.888 ug/L 94 22-124 2-Methylnaphthalene 2.00 1.602 ug/L 80 35-110 Naphthalene 2.00 1.493 ug/L 75 32-110 Phenanthrene 2.00 1.525 ug/L 76 41-110 Pyrene 2.00 1.766 ug/L 88 39-110 LCS LCS Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits 2-Fluorobiphenyl(Surr) 77 22-110 Nitrobenzene-d5(Surr) 71 17-116 Terphenyl-d14(Surr) 76 10-136 Lab Sample ID: LCSD 310-231616/3-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Dup Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231711 Prep Batch: 231616 Spike LCSD LCSD %Rec. RPD Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits RPD Limit Acenaphthene 2.00 1.548 ug/L 77 34-110 2 35 Acenaphthylene 2.00 1.828 ug/L 91 36-110 12 35 Anthracene 2.00 1.572 ug/L 79 42-110 0 35 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 50 of 73 3/12/2019 QC Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: 8270D SIM - Semivolatile Organic Compound (GC/MS SIM LL) (Continued) Lab Sample ID: LCSD 310-231616/3-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Dup Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231711 Prep Batch: 231616 Spike LCSD LCSD %Rec. RPD Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits RPD Limit Benzo[a]anthracene 2.00 1.455 ug/L 73 37-110 3 35 Benzo[a]pyrene 2.00 1.489 ug/L 74 36-111 21 35 Benzo[b]fluoranthene 2.00 1.338 ug/L 67 36-112 26 35 Benzo[g,h,i]perylene 2.00 1.498 * ug/L 75 10-122 40 35 Benzo[k]fluoranthene 2.00 1.383 ug/L 69 37-110 32 35 Chrysene 2.00 1.434 ug/L 72 30-110 4 35 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene 2.00 1.440 ug/L 72 10-122 30 35 9 Fluoranthene 2.00 1.157 ug/L 58 40-110 31 35 Fluorene 2.00 1.860 ug/L 93 30-110 19 35 Indeno[1,2,3-cd]pyrene 2.00 1.337 ug/L 67 22-124 34 35 2-Methylnaphthalene 2.00 1.510 ug/L 75 35-110 6 35 Naphthalene 2.00 1.487 ug/L 74 32-110 0 35 Phenanthrene 2.00 1.477 ug/L 74 41-110 3 35 Pyrene 2.00 1.208 * ug/L 60 39-110 37 35 LCSD LCSD Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits 2-Fluorobiphenyl(Surr) 75 22-110 Nitrobenzene-d5(Surr) 73 17-116 Terphenyl-d14(Surr) 55 10-136 Aethod: WI-GRO -Wisconsin - Gasoline Range Organics (GC) Lab Sample ID: MB 310-231611/1-A Client Sample ID: Method Blank Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231581 Prep Batch: 231611 MB MB Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Wisconsin GRO <9.84 9.84 mg/Kg 03/05/19 12:00 03/05/19 13:19 1 MB MB Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 99 80-120 03/05/19 12:00 03/05/19 13:19 1 Lab Sample ID: LCS 310-231611/2-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231581 Prep Batch: 231611 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Wisconsin GRO 39.4 42.65 mg/Kg 108 80-120 LCS LCS Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 106 80-120 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 51 of 73 3/12/2019 QC Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: WI-GRO - Wisconsin - Gasoline Range Organics (GC) (Continued) Lab Sample ID: LCSD 310-231611/25-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Dup Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231581 Prep Batch: 231611 Spike LCSD LCSD %Rec. RPD Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits RPD Limit Wisconsin GRO 38.0 43.23 mg/Kg 114 80-120 1 20 LCSD LCSD Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 107 80-120 Lab Sample ID: MB 310-231812/5 Client Sample ID: Method Blank 9 Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231812 MB MB Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Wisconsin GRO <100 100 ug/L 03/07/19 12:21 1 MB MB Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 84 80_120 03/07/19 12:21 1 1 Lab Sample ID: LCS 310-231812/6 Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231812 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Wisconsin GRO 800 819.9 ug/L 102 80-120 LCS LCS Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 106 80-120 Lab Sample ID: LCSD 310-231812/26 Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Dup Matrix:Water Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231812 Spike LCSD LCSD %Rec. RPD Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits RPD Limit Wisconsin GRO 800 846.9 ug/L 106 80-120 3 20 LCSD LCSD Surrogate %Recovery Qualifier Limits L._ 4-Bromofluorobenzene(Surr) 107 80-120 Method: WI-DRO - Wisconsin - Diesel Range Organics (GC) Lab Sample ID: MB 310-231605/1-A Client Sample ID: Method Blank Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Silica Gel Cleanup Analysis Batch: 231754 Prep Batch: 231605 MB MB Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Diesel Range Organics(DRO) <6.89 6.89 mg/Kg 03/05/19 13:25 03/07/19 11:01 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 52 of 73 3/12/2019 QC Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: WI-DRO - Wisconsin - Diesel Range Organics (GC) (Continued) Lab Sample ID: LCS 310-231605/2-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Silica Gel Cleanup Analysis Batch: 231754 Prep Batch: 231605 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Diesel Range Organics(DRO) 48.4 40.54 mg/Kg 84 70-120 Lab Sample ID: LCSD 310-231605/3-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Dup Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Silica Gel Cleanup Analysis Batch: 231754 Prep Batch: 231605 Spike LCSD LCSD %Rec. RPD Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits RPD Limit 9 Diesel Range Organics(DRO) 48.9 39.50 mg/Kg 81 70-120 3 20 Lab Sample ID: MB 310-231615/1-A Client Sample ID: Method Blank Matrix: Water Prep Type: Silica Gel Cleanup Analysis Batch: 231754 Prep Batch: 231615 MB MB Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Diesel Range Organics(DRO) <0.100 0.100 mg/L 03/05/19 13:55 03/07/19 12:52 1 Lab Sample ID: LCS 310-231615/2-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix: Water Prep Type: Silica Gel Cleanup Analysis Batch: 231754 Prep Batch: 231615 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Diesel Range Organics(DRO) 2.50 1.976 mg/L 79 75-115 Lab Sample ID: LCSD 310-231615/3-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Dup Matrix: Water Prep Type: Silica Gel Cleanup Analysis Batch: 231754 Prep Batch: 231615 Spike LCSD LCSD %Rec. RPD Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits RPD Limit Diesel Range Organics(DRO) 2.50 1.993 mg/L 80 75-115 1 20 Method: 6010D - Metals (ICP) Lab Sample ID: MB 310-231698/1-A Client Sample ID: Method Blank Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231865 Prep Batch: 231698 MB MB Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Arsenic <3.97 3.97 mg/Kg 03/06/19 10:16 03/07/19 12:57 1 Barium <0.992 0.992 mg/Kg 03/06/19 10:16 03/07/19 12:57 1 Cadmium <0.992 0.992 mg/Kg 03/06/19 10:16 03/07/19 12:57 1 1 Chromium <0.992 0.992 mg/Kg 03/06/19 10:16 03/07/19 12:57 1 Lead <4.96 4.96 mg/Kg 03/06/19 10:16 03/07/19 12:57 1 Selenium <7.44 7.44 mg/Kg 03/06/19 10:16 03/07/19 12:57 1 Silver <0.992 0.992 mg/Kg 03/06/19 10:16 03/07/19 12:57 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 53 of 73 3/12/2019 QC Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: 6010D - Metals (ICP) (Continued) Lab Sample ID: LCS 310-231698/2-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231865 Prep Batch: 231698 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Arsenic 186 199.0 mg/Kg 107 80-120 Barium 92.8 95.93 mg/Kg 103 80-120 Cadmium 92.8 97.25 mg/Kg 105 80-120 Chromium 92.8 96.94 mg/Kg 105 80-120 Lead 186 193.3 mg/Kg 104 80-120 Selenium 371 370.1 mg/Kg 100 80-120 Silver 92.8 98.46 mg/Kg 106 80-120 9 Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-2 MS Client Sample ID: B-6 22.5-25' Matrix: Soil Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231865 Prep Batch: 231698 Sample Sample Spike MS MS %Rec. Analyte Result Qualifier Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Arsenic <5.23 235 263.1 mg/Kg 111 75-125 Barium 138 Fl 117 229.6 mg/Kg 78 75-125 Cadmium 1.55 117 117.4 mg/Kg 99 75-125 Chromium 18.0 117 135.7 mg/Kg 100 75-125 Lead 113 235 396.6 mg/Kg 4 121 75-125 Selenium <9.81 470 491.2 mg/Kg 105 75-125 Silver <1.31 117 128.3 mg/Kg 109 75-125 1-- Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-2 MSD Client Sample ID: B-6 22.5-25' Matrix: Soil Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231865 Prep Batch: 231698 Sample Sample Spike MSD MSD %Rec. RPD Analyte Result Qualifier Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits RPD Limit Arsenic <5.23 248 284.3 mg/Kg 114 75-125 8 20 Barium 138 Fl 124 199.1 Fl mg/Kg -D 49 75-125 14 20 Cadmium 1.55 124 128.6 mg/Kg 102 75-125 9 20 Chromium 18.0 124 144.2 mg/Kg - 102 75-125 6 20 Lead 113 248 417.7 mg/Kg 123 75-125 5 20 Selenium <9.81 496 530.7 mg/Kg 107 75-125 8 20 Silver <1.31 124 141.9 mg/Kg 114 75-125 10 20 Method: 6020B - Metals (ICP/MS) Lab Sample ID: MB 310-231664/1-A Client Sample ID: Method Blank Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 232224 Prep Batch: 231664 MB MB Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Arsenic <0.00200 0.00200 mg/L 03/06/19 08:12 03/12/19 12:36 1 Barium <0.00200 0.00200 mg/L 03/06/19 08:12 03/12/19 12:36 1 Cadmium <0.000500 0.000500 mg/L 03/06/19 08:12 03/12/19 12:36 1 Chromium <0.00500 0.00500 mg/L 03/06/19 08:12 03/12/19 12:36 1 Lead <0.000500 0.000500 mg/L 03/06/19 08:12 03/12/19 12:36 1 Selenium <0.00500 0.00500 mg/L 03/06/19 08:12 03/12/19 12:36 1 Silver <0.00100 0.00100 mg/L 03/06/19 08:12 03/12/19 12:36 1 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 54 of 73 3/12/2019 QC Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Vlethod: 6020B - Metals (ICP/MS) (Continued) Lab Sample ID: LCS 310-231664/2-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 232224 Prep Batch: 231664 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Arsenic 0.0400 0.04543 mg/L 114 80-120 Barium 0.0400 0.04105 mg/L 103 80-120 Cadmium 0.0200 0.02081 mg/L 104 80-120 Chromium 0.0400 0.04073 mg/L 102 80-120 Lead 0.0200 0.02003 mg/L 100 80-120 Selenium 0.0400 0.04066 mg/L 102 80-120 Silver 0.0200 0.02071 mg/L 104 80.120 9 Method: 7470A - Mercury (CVAA) Lab Sample ID: MB 310-231690/1-A Client Sample ID: Method Blank Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231880 Prep Batch: 231690 MB MB Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Mercury <0.000200 0.000200 mg/L 03/06/19 09:20 03/07/19 14:53 1 Lab Sample ID: LCS 310-231690/2-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix: Water Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231880 Prep Batch: 231690 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Mercury 0.00167 0.001704 mg/L 102 80-120 Method: 7471B - Mercury (CVAA) Lab Sample ID: MB 310-231702/1-A Client Sample ID: Method Blank Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231828 Prep Batch: 231702 MB MB Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Mercury <0.0172 0.0172 mg/Kg 03/06/19 10:39 03/07/19 09:59 1 Lab Sample ID: LCS 310-231702/2-A Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix: Solid Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231828 Prep Batch: 231702 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Mercury 0.151 0.1783 mg/Kg 118 80.120 Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-2 MS Client Sample ID: B-6 22.5-25' Matrix: Soil Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231828 Prep Batch: 231702 Sample Sample Spike MS MS %Rec. Analyte Result Qualifier Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Mercury 0.120 F1 0.235 0.4224 F1 mg/Kg 129 80-120 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 55 of 73 3/12/2019 QC Sample Results Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: 7471B - Mercury (CVAA) (Continued) Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-2 MSD Client Sample ID: B-6 22.5-25' Matrix: Soil Prep Type: Total/NA Analysis Batch: 231828 Prep Batch: 231702 Sample Sample Spike MSD MSD %Rec. RPD Analyte Result Qualifier Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits RPD Limit Mercury 0.120 F1 0.212 0.4294 F1 mg/Kg 146 80_120 2 20 9 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 56 of 73 3/12/2019 QC Association Summary Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 3C/MS VOA - - Analysis Batch: 231408 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-150364-8 B-10 Total/NA Ground Water 8260B lc MB 310-231408/8 Method Blank Total/NA Water 8260B & LCS 310-231408/6 Lab Control Sample Total/NA Water 8260B LCS 310-231408/7 Lab Control Sample Total/NA Water 8260B Analysis Batch: 231411 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-150364-8 B-10 Total/NA Ground Water 8260B MB 310-231411/8 Method Blank Total/NA Water 8260B LCS 310-231411/6 Lab Control Sample Total/NA Water 8260B LCS 310-231411/7 Lab Control Sample Total/NA Water 8260B 10 Prep Batch: 231646 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-150364-1 Trip Blank Total/NA Soil 5035 310-150364-2 B-6 22.5-25' Total/NA Soil 5035 310-150364-3 B-7 5-10' Total/NA Soil 5035 310-150364-4 B-715-20' Total/NA Soil 5035 y;= 310-150364-5 B-8 15-17.5' Total/NA Soil 5035 310-150364-6 B-9 9-10' Total/NA Soil 5035 310-150364-7 B-10 0-5' Total/NA Soil 5035 MB 310-231646/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Solid 5035 LCS 310-231646/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Solid 5035 Analysis Batch: 231648 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-150364-1 Trip Blank Total/NA Soil 8260B 231646 310-150364-2 B-6 22.5-25' Total/NA Soil 8260B 231646 310-150364-3 B-7 5-10' Total/NA Soil 8260B 231646 310-150364-4 B-7 15-20' Total/NA Soil 8260B 231646 310-150364-5 B-8 15-17.5' Total/NA Soil 8260B 231646 310-150364-6 B-9 9-10' Total/NA Soil 8260B 231646 310-150364-7 B-10 0-5' Total/NA Soil 8260B 231646 MB 310-231646/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Solid 8260B 231646 LCS 310-231646/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Solid 8260B 231646 Prep Batch: 231748 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-150364-2 B-6 22.5-25' Total/NA Soil 5035 310-150364-4 B-7 15-20' Total/NA Soil 5035 MB 310-231748/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Solid 5035 LCS 310-231748/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Solid 5035 Analysis Batch: 231750 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-150364-2 B-6 22.5-25' Total/NA Soil 8260B 231748 310-150364-4 B-7 15-20' Total/NA Soil 8260B 231748 MB 310-231748/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Solid 8260B 231748 LCS 310-231748/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Solid 8260B 231748 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 57 of 73 3/12/2019 QC Association Summary Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 GC/MS Semi VOA Prep Batch: 231608 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-150364-2 B-6 22.5-25' Total/NA Soil 3546 310-150364-3 B-7 5-10' Total/NA Soil 3546 310-150364-4 B-7 15-20' Total/NA Soil 3546 310-150364-5 B-8 15-17.5' Total/NA Soil 3546 310-150364-6 B-9 9-10' Total/NA Soil 3546 310-150364-7 B-10 0-5' Total/NA Soil 3546 MB 310-231608/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Solid 3546 LCS 310-231608/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Solid 3546 310-150364-2 MS B-6 22.5-25' Total/NA Soil 3546 310-150364-2 MSD B-6 22.5-25' Total/NA Soil 3546 Prep Batch: 231616 10 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-150364-8 B-10 Total/NA Ground Water 3510C MB 310-231616/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Water 3510C LCS 310-231616/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Water 3510C LCSD 310-231616/3-A Lab Control Sample Dup Total/NA Water 3510C t€ Analysis Batch: 2317110 00 0:`' Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-150364-2 B-6 22.5-25' Total/NA Soil 8270D SIM 231608 310-150364-3 B-7 5-10' Total/NA Soil 8270D SIM 231608 310-150364-4 B-7 15-20' Total/NA Soil 8270D SIM 231608 310-150364-5 B-8 15-17.5' Total/NA Soil 8270D SIM 231608 310-150364-6 B-9 9-10' Total/NA Soil 8270D SIM 231608 310-150364-7 B-10 0-5' Total/NA Soil 8270D SIM 231608 310-150364-8 B-10 Total/NA Ground Water 8270D SIM 231616 MB 310-231616/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Water 8270D SIM 231616 LCS 310-231616/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Water 8270D SIM 231616 LCSD 310-231616/3-A Lab Control Sample Dup Total/NA Water 8270D SIM 231616 310-150364-2 MS B-6 22.5-25' Total/NA Soil 8270D SIM 231608 310-150364-2 MSD B-6 22.5-25' Total/NA Soil 8270D SIM 231608 Analysis Batch: 231817 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-150364-3 B-7 5-10' Total/NA Soil 8270D SIM 231608 MB 310-231608/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Solid 8270D SIM 231608 Analysis Batch: 231943 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch LCS 310-231608/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Solid 8270D SIM 231608 GC VOA Analysis Batch: 231581 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-150364-1 Trip Blank Total/NA Soil WI-GRO 231611 310-150364-2 B-6 22.5-25' Total/NA Soil WI-GRO 231611 310-150364-3 B-7 5-10' Total/NA Soil WI-GRO 231611 310-150364-4 B-715-20' Total/NA Soil WI-GRO 231611 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 58 of 73 3/12/2019 QC Association Summary .., 31 Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 3C VOA (Continued) Analysis Batch: 231581 (Continued) Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch ,,,11,,*,,, , 310-150364-5 B-8 15-17.5' Total/NA Soil WI-GRO 231611 310-150364-6 B-9 9-10' Total/NA Soil WI-GRO 231611 '- 310-150364-7 B-10 0-5' Total/NA Soil WI-GRO 231611 MB 310-231611/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Solid WI-GRO 231611 LCS 310-231611/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Solid WI-GRO 231611 LCSD 310-231611/25-A Lab Control Sample Dup Total/NA Solid WI-GRO 231611 Prep Batch: 231611 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-150364-1 Trip Blank Total/NA Soil WI GRO 310-150364-2 B-6 22.5-25' Total/NA Soil WI GRO 310-150364-3 B-7 5-10' Total/NA Soil WI GRO 10 310-150364-4 B-7 15-20' Total/NA Soil WI GRO 310-150364-5 B-8 15-17.5' Total/NA Soil WI GRO 310-150364-6 B-9 9-10' Total/NA Soil WI GRO 310-150364-7 B-10 0-5' Total/NA Soil WI GRO MB 310-231611/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Solid 5035 LCS 310-231611/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Solid 5035 LCSD 310-231611/25-A Lab Control Sample Dup Total/NA Solid 5035 Analysis Batch: 231812 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-150364-8 B-10 Total/NA Ground Water WI-GRO MB 310-231812/5 Method Blank Total/NA Water WI-GRO LCS 310-231812/6 Lab Control Sample Total/NA Water WI-GRO LCSD 310-231812/26 Lab Control Sample Dup Total/NA Water WI-GRO GC Semi VOA Prep Batch: 231605 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-150364-2 B-6 22.5-25' Silica Gel Cleanup Soil WI DRO PREP 310-150364-3 B-7 5-10' Silica Gel Cleanup Soil WI DRO PREP 310-150364-4 B-7 15-20' Silica Gel Cleanup Soil WI DRO PREP 310-150364-5 B-8 15-17.5' Silica Gel Cleanup Soil WI DRO PREP 310-150364-6 B-9 9-10' Silica Gel Cleanup Soil WI DRO PREP 310-150364-7 B-10 0-5' Silica Gel Cleanup Soil WI DRO PREP MB 310-231605/1-A Method Blank Silica Gel Cleanup Solid WI DRO PREP LCS 310-231605/2-A Lab Control Sample Silica Gel Cleanup Solid WI DRO PREP LCSD 310-231605/3-A Lab Control Sample Dup Silica Gel Cleanup Solid WI DRO PREP Prep Batch: 231610 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-150364-2 B-6 22.5-25' Total/NA Soil 3546 310-150364-3 B-7 5-10' Total/NA Soil 3546 310-150364-4 B-7 15-20' Total/NA Soil 3546 310-150364-5 B-815-17.5' Total/NA Soil 3546 310-150364-6 B-9 9-10' Total/NA Soil 3546 310-150364-7 B-10 0-5' Total/NA Soil 3546 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 59 of 73 3/12/2019 QC Association Summary Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 GC Semi VOA (Continued) Prep Batch: 231615 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch , , 310-150364-8 B-10 Silica Gel Cleanup Ground Water 3510C SGC MB 310-231615/1-A Method Blank Silica Gel Cleanup Water 3510C '.a `"` LCS 310-231615/2-A Lab Control Sample Silica Gel Cleanup Water 3510C LCSD 310-231615/3-A Lab Control Sample Dup Silica Gel Cleanup Water 3510C Analysis Batch: 231726 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-150364-2 B-6 22.5-25' Total/NA Soil 8082A 231610 310-150364-4 B-7 15-20' Total/NA Soil 8082A 231610 310-150364-5 B-815-17.5' Total/NA Soil 8082A 231610 310-150364-7 B-10 0-5' Total/NA Soil 8082A 231610 10 Analysis Batch: 231754 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-150364-2 B-6 22.5-25' Silica Gel Cleanup Soil WI-DRO 231605 310-150364-4 B-7 15-20' Silica Gel Cleanup Soil WI-DRO 231605 310-150364-5 B-8 15-17.5' Silica Gel Cleanup Soil WI-DRO 231605 It;:, 310-150364-6 B-9 9-10' Silica Gel Cleanup Soil WI-DRO 231605 I,,,,I 310-150364-7 B-10 0-5' Silica Gel Cleanup Soil WI-DRO 231605 310-150364-8 B-10 Silica Gel Cleanup Ground Water WI-DRO 231615 MB 310-231605/1-A Method Blank Silica Gel Cleanup Solid WI-DRO 231605 MB 310-231615/1-A Method Blank Silica Gel Cleanup Water WI-DRO 231615 LCS 310-231605/2-A Lab Control Sample Silica Gel Cleanup Solid WI-DRO 231605 LCS 310-231615/2-A Lab Control Sample Silica Gel Cleanup Water WI-DRO 231615 LCSD 310-231605/3-A Lab Control Sample Dup Silica Gel Cleanup Solid WI-DRO 231605 LCSD 310-231615/3-A Lab Control Sample Dup Silica Gel Cleanup Water WI-DRO 231615 Analysis Batch: 231890 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-150364-3 B-7 5-10' Silica Gel Cleanup Soil WI-DRO 231605 Analysis Batch: 231913 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-150364-2 B-6 22.5-25' Total/NA Soil 8082A 231610 310-150364-3 B-7 5-10' Total/NA Soil 8082A 231610 310-150364-4 B-7 15-20' Total/NA Soil 8082A 231610 310-150364-5 B-815-17.5' Total/NA Soil 8082A 231610 Analysis Batch: 232056 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-150364-3 B-7 5-10' Total/NA Soil 8082A 231610 310-150364-6 B-9 9-10' Total/NA Soil 8082A 231610 Metals Prep Batch: 231664 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-150364-8 B-10 Dissolved Ground Water 3010A MB 310-231664/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Water 3010A LCS 310-231664/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Water 3010A TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 60 of 73 3/12/2019 QC Association Summary Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Vletals (Continued) Prep Batch: 231690 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-150364-8 B-10 Dissolved Ground Water 7470A MB 310-231690/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Water 7470A °" LCS 310-231690/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Water 7470A Prep Batch: 231698 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-150364-2 B-6 22.5-25' Total/NA Soil 3050B 310-150364-3 B-7 5-10' Total/NA Soil 3050B 310-150364-4 B-7 15-20' Total/NA Soil 3050B 310-150364-5 B-815-17.5' Total/NA Soil 3050B 310-150364-6 B-9 9-10' Total/NA Soil 3050B 310-150364-7 B-10 0-5' Total/NA Soil 3050B 10 MB 310-231698/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Solid 3050B LCS 310-231698/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Solid 3050B 310-150364-2 MS B-6 22.5-25' Total/NA Soil 3050B 310-150364-2 MSD B-6 22.5-25' Total/NA Soil 3050B Prep Batch: 231702 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-150364-2 B-6 22.5-25' Total/NA Soil 7471B 310-150364-3 B-7 5-10' Total/NA Soil 7471B 310-150364-4 B-7 15-20' Total/NA Soil 7471B 310-150364-5 B-8 15-17.5' Total/NA Soil 7471B 310-150364-6 B-9 9-10' Total/NA Soil 7471B 310-150364-7 B-10 0-5' Total/NA Soil 7471B MB 310-231702/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Solid 7471B LCS 310-231702/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Solid 7471B 310-150364-2 MS B-6 22.5-25' Total/NA Soil 7471B 310-150364-2 MSD B-6 22.5-25' Total/NA Soil 7471B Analysis Batch: 231828 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-150364-2 B-6 22.5-25' Total/NA Soil 7471B 231702 310-150364-3 B-7 5-10' Total/NA Soil 7471B 231702 310-150364-4 B-7 15-20' Total/NA Soil 7471B 231702 310-150364-5 B-8 15-17.5' Total/NA Soil 7471B 231702 310-150364-6 B-9 9-10' Total/NA Soil 7471B 231702 310-150364-7 B-10 0-5' Total/NA Soil 7471B 231702 MB 310-231702/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Solid 7471B 231702 LCS 310-231702/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Solid 7471B 231702 310-150364-2 MS B-6 22.5-25' Total/NA Soil 7471B 231702 310-150364-2 MSD B-6 22.5-25' Total/NA Soil 7471B 231702 Analysis Batch: 231865 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-150364-2 B-6 22.5-25' Total/NA Soil 6010D 231698 310-150364-3 B-7 5-10' Total/NA Soil 6010D 231698 310-150364-4 B-7 15-20' Total/NA Soil 6010D 231698 310-150364-5 B-815-17.5' Total/NA Soil 6010D 231698 310-150364-6 B-9 9-10' Total/NA Soil 6010D 231698 310-150364-7 B-10 0-5' Total/NA Soil 6010D 231698 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 61 of 73 3/12/2019 QC Association Summary Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Metals (Continued) Analysis Batch: 231865(Continued) Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch MB 310-231698/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Solid 6010D 231698 LCS 310-231698/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Solid 6010D 231698 V',•- , - 310-150364-2 MS B-6 22.5-25' Total/NA Soil 6010D 231698 310-150364-2 MSD B-6 22.5-25' Total/NA Soil 6010D 231698 Analysis Batch: 231880 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-150364-8 B-10 Dissolved Ground Water 7470A 231690 MB 310-231690/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Water 7470A 231690 LCS 310-231690/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Water 7470A 231690 Analysis Batch: 232220 10 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-150364-8 B-10 Dissolved Ground Water 6020B 231664 MB 310-231664/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Water 6020B 231664 LCS 310-231664/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Water 6020B 231664 Analysis Batch: 232224 ,; Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-150364-8 B-10 Dissolved Ground Water 6020B 231664 MB 310-231664/1-A Method Blank Total/NA Water 6020B 231664 LCS 310-231664/2-A Lab Control Sample Total/NA Water 6020B 231664 General Chemistry Analysis Batch: 231561 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-150364-2 B-6 22.5-25' Total/NA Soil Moisture 310-150364-3 B-7 5-10' Total/NA Soil Moisture 310-150364-4 B-7 15-20' Total/NA Soil Moisture 310-150364-5 B-8 15-17.5' Total/NA Soil Moisture 310-150364-6 B-9 9-10' Total/NA Soil Moisture 310-150364-7 B-10 0-5' Total/NA Soil Moisture TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 62 of 73 3/12/2019 Lab Chronicle Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: Trip Blank Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-1 Date Collected: 03/01/19 08:00 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 03/05/19 10:05 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared u i' Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Prep 5035 231646 03/06/19 05:47 TCH TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8260B 1 231648 03/06/19 13:26 TCH TAL CF Total/NA Prep WI GRO 231611 03/05/19 12:00 CMM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis WI-GRO 1 231581 03/05/19 15:13 CMM TAL CF Client Sample ID: B-6 22.5-25' Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-2 Date Collected: 03/01/19 10:25 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 03/05/19 10:05 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis Moisture 1 231561 03/05/19 11:27 SAS TAL CF 6 i i' Client Sample ID: B-6 22.5-25' Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-2 Date Collected: 03/01/19 10:25 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 03/05/19 10:05 Percent Solids: 69.3 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Prep 5035 231646 03/06/19 05:47 TCH TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8260B 1 231648 03/06/19 13:50 TCH TAL CF Total/NA Prep 5035 231748 03/07/19 05:38 TCH TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8260B 1 231750 03/07/19 09:11 TCH TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3546 231608 03/05/19 13:33 EAM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8270D SIM 10 231711 03/06/19 16:23 BKT TAL CF Total/NA Prep WI GRO 231611 03/05/19 12:00 CMM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis WI-GRO 1 231581 03/05/19 21:45 CMM TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3546 231610 03/05/19 13:39 EAM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8082A 1 231726 03/07/19 00:50 BBW TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3546 231610 03/05/19 13:39 EAM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8082A 5 231913 03/08/19 12:15 BBW TAL CF Silica Gel Cleanup Prep WI DRO PREP 231605 03/05/19 13:25 EAM TAL CF Silica Gel Cleanup Analysis WI-DRO 5 231754 03/07/19 11:37 JTA TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3050B 231698 03/06/19 10:16 HED TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 6010D 1 231865 03/07/19 13:05 CTB TAL CF Total/NA Prep 7471B 231702 03/06/19 10:39 JNR TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 7471B 1 231828 03/07/19 10:06 JNR TAL CF Client Sample ID: B-7 5-10' Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-3 Date Collected: 03/01/19 11:05 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 03/05/19 10:05 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis Moisture 1 231561 03/05/19 11:27 SAS TAL CF TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 63 of 73 3/12/2019 Lab Chronicle Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-7 5-10' Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-3 Date Collected: 03/01/19 11:05 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 03/05/19 10:05 Percent Solids: 74.6 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared P.m: Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab 1F' Total/NA Prep 5035 231646 03/06/19 05:47 TCH TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8260B 1 231648 03/06/19 14:15 TCH TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3546 231608 03/05/19 13:33 EAM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8270D SIM 100 231711 03/06/19 17:18 BKT TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3546 231608 03/05/19 13:33 EAM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8270D SIM 1000 231817 03/07/19 15:19 BKT TAL CF Total/NA Prep WI GRO 231611 03/05/19 12:00 CMM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis WI-GRO 1 231581 03/05/19 22:23 CMM TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3546 231610 03/05/19 13:39 EAM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8082A 2 232056 03/11/19 15:27 BBW TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3546 231610 03/05/19 13:39 EAM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8082A 50 231913 03/08/19 12:26 BBW TAL CF Silica Gel Cleanup Prep WI DRO PREP 231605 03/05/19 13:25 EAM TAL CF Silica Gel Cleanup Analysis WI-DRO 100 231890 03/08/19 07:10 JTA TAL CF ,; Total/NA Prep 3050B 231698 03/06/19 10:16 HED TAL CF '• t Total/NA Analysis 6010D 4 231865 03/07/19 13:45 CTB TAL CF Total/NA Prep 7471B 231702 03/06/19 10:39 JNR TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 7471B 1 231828 03/07/19 10:15 JNR TAL CF Client Sample ID: B-7 15-20' Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-4 Date Collected: 03/01/19 11:20 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 03/05/19 10:05 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis Moisture 1 231561 03/05/19 11:27 SAS TAL CF Client Sample ID: B-7 15-20' Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-4 Date Collected: 03/01/19 11:20 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 03/05/19 10:05 Percent Solids: 62.6 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Prep 5035 231646 03/06/19 05:47 TCH TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8260B 1 231648 03/06/19 14:39 TCH TAL CF Total/NA Prep 5035 231748 03/07/19 05:38 TCH TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8260B 1 231750 03/07/19 09:36 TCH TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3546 231608 03/05/19 13:33 EAM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8270D SIM 10 231711 03/06/19 17:36 BKT TAL CF Total/NA Prep WI GRO 231611 03/05/19 12:00 CMM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis WI-GRO 1 231581 03/05/19 23:02 CMM TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3546 231610 03/05/19 13:39 EAM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8082A 1 231726 03/07/19 01:11 BBW TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3546 231610 03/05/19 13:39 EAM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8082A 5 231913 03/08/19 12:37 BBW TAL CF TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 64 of 73 3/12/2019 Lab Chronicle , , Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-7 15-20' Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-4 Date Collected: 03/01/19 11:20 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 03/05/19 10:05 Percent Solids: 62.6 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared w,= k,, '3 Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab kra,' Silica Gel Cleanup Prep WI DRO PREP 231605 03/05/19 13:25 EAM TAL CF Silica Gel Cleanup Analysis WI-DRO 1 231754 03/07/19 11:25 JTA TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3050B 231698 03/06/19 10:16 HED TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 6010D 3 231865 03/07/19 13:47 CTB TAL CF Total/NA Prep 7471B 231702 03/06/19 10:39 JNR TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 7471B 10 231828 03/07/19 11:08 JNR TAL CF Client Sample ID: B-8 15-17.5' Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-5 Date Collected: 03/01/19 12:15 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 03/05/19 10:05 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Eln Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis Moisture 1 231561 03/05/19 11:27 SAS TAL CF Client Sample ID: B-8 15-17.5' Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-5 P` Date Collected: 03/01/19 12:15 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 03/05/19 10:05 Percent Solids: 78.8 r Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Prep 5035 231646 03/06/19 05:47 TCH TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8260B 1 231648 03/06/19 15:03 TCH TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3546 231608 03/05/19 13:33 EAM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8270D SIM 10 231711 03/06/19 18:13 BKT TAL CF Total/NA Prep WI GRO 231611 03/05/19 12:00 CMM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis WI-GRO 1 231581 03/05/19 23:40 CMM TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3546 231610 03/05/19 13:39 EAM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8082A 1 231726 03/07/19 01:22 BBW TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3546 231610 03/05/19 13:39 EAM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8082A 10 231913 03/08/19 12:47 BBW TAL CF Silica Gel Cleanup Prep WI DRO PREP 231605 03/05/19 13:25 EAM TAL CF Silica Gel Cleanup Analysis WI-DRO 1 231754 03/07/19 12:02 JTA TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3050B 231698 03/06/19 10:16 HED TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 6010D 7 231865 03/07/19 13:55 CTB TAL CF Total/NA Prep 7471B 231702 03/06/19 10:39 JNR TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 7471B 1 231828 03/07/19 10:28 JNR TAL CF Client Sample ID: B-9 9-10' Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-6 Date Collected: 03/01/19 13:50 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 03/05/19 10:05 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis Moisture 1 231561 03/05/19 11:27 SAS TAL CF TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 65 of 73 3/12/2019 Lab Chronicle Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-9 9-10' Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-6 Date Collected: 03/01/19 13:50 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 03/05/19 10:05 Percent Solids: 85.1 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab I Total/NA Prep 5035 231646 03/06/19 05:47 TCH TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8260B 1 231648 03/06/19 15:27 TCH TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3546 231608 03/05/19 13:33 EAM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8270D SIM 10 231711 03/06/19 18:50 BKT TAL CF Total/NA Prep WI GRO 231611 03/05/19 12:00 CMM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis WI-GRO 1 231581 03/06/19 00:18 CMM TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3546 231610 03/05/19 13:39 EAM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8082A 1 232056 03/11/19 15:37 BBW TAL CF Silica Gel Cleanup Prep WI DRO PREP 231605 03/05/19 13:25 EAM TAL CF Silica Gel Cleanup Analysis WI-DRO 1 231754 03/07/19 12:15 JTA TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3050B 231698 03/06/19 10:16 HED TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 6010D 1 231865 03/07/19 13:22 CTB TAL CF Total/NA Prep 7471B 231702 03/06/19 10:39 JNR TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 7471B 1 231828 03/07/19 10:32 JNR TAL CF Client Sample ID: B-10 0-5' Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-7 Date Collected: 03/01/19 15:30 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 03/05/19 10:05 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis Moisture 1 231561 03/05/19 11:27 SAS TAL CF Client Sample ID: B-10 0-5' Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-7 Date Collected: 03/01/19 15:30 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 03/05/19 10:05 Percent Solids: 81.7 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Prep 5035 231646 03/06/19 05:47 TCH TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8260B 1 231648 03/06/19 15:51 TCH TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3546 231608 03/05/19 13:33 EAM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8270D SIM 10 231711 03/06/19 19:27 BKT TAL CF Total/NA Prep WI GRO 231611 03/05/19 12:00 CMM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis WI-GRO 1 231581 03/06/19 00:56 CMM TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3546 231610 03/05/19 13:39 EAM TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8082A 1 231726 03/07/19 01:43 BBW TAL CF Silica Gel Cleanup Prep WI DRO PREP 231605 03/05/19 13:25 EAM TAL CF Silica Gel Cleanup Analysis WI-DRO 1 231754 03/07/19 12:27 JTA TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3050B 231698 03/06/19 10:16 HED TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 6010D 1 231865 03/07/19 13:24 CTB TAL CF Total/NA Prep 7471B 231702 03/06/19 10:39 JNR TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 7471B 1 231828 03/07/19 10:34 JNR TAL CF TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 66 of 73 3/12/2019 Lab Chronicle Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows - Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 :tient Sample ID: B-10 Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-8 Date Collected: 03/01/19 16:00 Matrix: Ground Water Date Received: 03/05/19 10:05 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Preparedmyi Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab Total/NA Analysis 8260B 1 231411 03/06/19 08:36 SJN TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8260B 1 231408 03/06/19 10:52 SJN TAL CF Total/NA Prep 3510C 231616 03/05/19 13:56 ACJ TAL CF Total/NA Analysis 8270D SIM 10 231711 03/06/19 13:55 BKT TAL CF Total/NA Analysis WI-GRO 1 231812 03/07/19 18:04 DLK TAL CF Silica Gel Cleanup Prep 3510C SGC 231615 03/05/19 13:55 ACJ TAL CF Silica Gel Cleanup Analysis WI-DRO 1 231754 03/07/19 13:16 JTA TAL CF Dissolved Prep 3010A 231664 03/06/19 08:13 HED TAL CF Dissolved Analysis 6020B 1 232220 03/12/19 13:29 SAD TAL CF Dissolved Prep 3010A 231664 03/06/19 08:13 HED TAL CF Dissolved Analysis 6020B 1 232224 03/12/19 13:29 SAD TAL CFall Dissolved Prep 7470A 231690 03/06/19 09:20 JNR TAL CF Dissolved Analysis 7470A 1 231880 03/07/19 15:28 JNR TAL CF Laboratory References: _. ,�, TAL CF=TestAmerica Cedar Falls,704 Enterprise Drive,Cedar Falls, IA 50613,TEL (319)277-2401 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 67 of 73 3/12/2019 Accreditation/Certification Summary Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Laboratory: TestAmerica Cedar Falls Unless otherwise noted,all analytes for this laboratory were covered under each accreditation/certification below. Authority Program EPA Region Identification Number Expiration Date Minnesota NELAP 5 019-999-319 12-31-19 The following analytes are included in this report,but the laboratory is not certified by the governing authority. This list may include analytes for which the agency does not offer certification. Analysis Method Prep Method Matrix Analyte 8082A 3546 Soil PCB-1268 8260B Ground Water Dichlorofluoromethane 8260B 5035 Soil Dichlorofluoromethane Moisture Soil Percent Moisture Moisture Soil Percent Solids El TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 68 of 73 3/12/2019 Method Summary Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-1 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method Method Description Protocol Laboratory 8260B Volatile Organic Compounds(GC/MS) SW846 TAL CF 8270D SIM Semivolatile Organic Compound(GC/MS SIM LL) SW846 TAL CF WI-GRO Wisconsin-Gasoline Range Organics(GC) WI-GRO TAL CF 8082A Polychlorinated Biphenyls(PCBs)by Gas Chromatography SW846 TAL CF ; - WI-DRO Wisconsin-Diesel Range Organics(GC) WI-DRO TAL CF 6010D Metals(ICP) SW846 TAL CF 6020B Metals(ICP/MS) SW846 TAL CF 7470A Mercury(CVAA) SW846 TAL CF 7471 B Mercury(CVAA) SW846 TAL CF Moisture Percent Moisture EPA TAL CF '' 3010A Preparation, Total Metals SW846 TAL CF 3050B Preparation, Metals SW846 TAL CF 3510C Liquid-Liquid Extraction(Separatory Funnel) SW846 TAL CF 3510C SGC Liquid-Liquid Extraction(Separatory Funnel) SW846 TAL CF 3546 Microwave Extraction SW846 TAL CF 5030B Purge and Trap SW846 TAL CF 5035 Closed System Purge and Trap SW846 TAL CF 7470A Preparation,Mercury SW846 TAL CF 7471 B Preparation,Mercury SW846 TAL CF WI DRO PREP Wisconsin Extraction(Diesel Range Organics) WI-DRO TAL CF WI GRO Closed System Purge and Trap WI-GRO TAL CF Ea Protocol References: EPA=US Environmental Protection Agency SW846="Test Methods For Evaluating Solid Waste,Physical/Chemical Methods",Third Edition,November 1986 And Its Updates. WI-DRO="Modified DRO: Method For Determining Diesel Range Organics",Wisconsin DNR,Publ-SW-141,September,1995. WI-GRO="Modified GRO: Method For Determining Gasoline Range Organics",Wisconsin DNR,PubI-SW-140,September,1995. Laboratory References: TAL CF=TestAmerica Cedar Falls,704 Enterprise Drive,Cedar Falls,IA 50613,TEL(319)277-2401 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 69 of 73 3/12/2019 TestArnerica 11111 111 1 111 11 111 THE LEADER IN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING 310-150364 Chain of Custody Cooler/Sample Receipt and Temperature Log Form Client Information Client: tan L , City/State: w\ p p taLn Project: E s v e r M r act OU)S Receipt Information Date/Time Received: 3 5, 19 I DOn Received By: L44.t3 Delivery Type: UPS FedEx [1]FedEx Ground ❑US Mail ❑Spee-Dee ❑TA Courier ❑TA Field Services ❑Client Drop-off ❑Other: Condition of Cooler/Containers Sample(s)received in Cooler? IS Yes ❑No If yes: Cooler ID: Multiple Coolers? 15g Yes { 'Rb06 If yes: Cooler# ) of i•••- Cooler Cooler Custody Seals Present? ®Yes n No If yes: Cooler custody seals intact? ®Yes ❑No Sample Custody Seals Present? ❑Yes 43 No If yes: Sample custody seals intact? ❑Yes ❑No 14 Trip Blank Present? n Yes [A No If yes: Which VOA samples are in cooler? 1 Temperature Record Coolant: E]Wet ice ❑ Blue ice ❑Dry ice ❑Other: ❑ NONE Thermometer ID: Correction Factor(°C): -fi,Cj• 0 •Temp Blank Temperature—If no temp blank,or temp blank temperature above criteria,proceed to Sample Container Temperature Uncorrected Temp(°C): j . Corrected Temp(°C): I, •Sample Container Temperature Container type(s)used: Uncorrected Temp(°C): Corrected Temp(°C): Exceptions Noted. 1) If temperature exceeds criteria,was sample(s)received same day of sampling? ❑Yes ❑No a) If yes: Is there evidence that the chilling process began? ❑Yes ❑No 2) If temperature is<0°C,are there obvious signs that the integrity of sample containers is compromised? (e.g.,bulging septa,broken/cracked bottles,frozen solid?) ❑Yes ❑No NOTE: If yes,contact PM before proceeding. If no,proceed with login Additional Comments Document:CF-LG-WI-002 Revision:23 General temperature criteria is 0 to 6°C Date:12/31/2017 TestAmerica-Cedar Falls Bacteria temperature criteria is 0 to 10°C Page 70 of 73 3/12/2019 gi , TestAmerica Place COC scanning label her ! THE LEADER IN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING Cooler/Sample Receipt and Temperature Log Form Client Information4. Client: Wi l(,- City/State: ma c' `r , 1-`LI,Ln ty\ Project: S vY1C t' «' Till t'C<C{UI S Receipt Information i. Date/Time Received: 3 45, )g )OQn Received By: f-�J Delivery Type: ❑UPS r/ FTC FedEx ❑FedEx Ground n US Mail n Spee-Dee n TA Courier ❑TA Field Services ❑Client Drop-off ❑Other: 1 I Condition of Cooler/Containers Sample(s) received in Cooler? D Yes ❑No If yes: Cooler ID: 5.01 Multiple Coolers? a]Yes Ei1Vb i.jv,If yes: Cooler# 2- of 2 , Cooler Custody Seals Present? ®Yes ❑No If yes: Cooler custody seals intact? Ed Yes ❑No , Sample Custody Seals Present? ElYes Q No If yes: Sample custody seals intact? [Yes n No .§ Trip Blank Present? [TI Yes f N If yes: Which VOA samples are in cooler? j 14 at ( rnfd-ha- 6( U1cJS n tc'Ul -;2-. Temperature Record Coolant: ®Wet ice ❑ Blue ice ❑Dry ice ❑Other: Li NONE Thermometer ID: Correction Factor(°C): 1''o, 0 •Temp Blank Temperature—If no temp blank,or temp blank temperature above criteria,proceed to Sample Container Temperature Uncorrected Temp(°C): D - T Corrected Temp(°C): 0 , •Sample Container Temperature Container type(s) used: Uncorrected Temp(°C): Corrected Temp(°C): Exceptions Noted 1) If temperature exceeds criteria,was sample(s)received same day of sampling? ❑Yes ❑No a) If yes: Is there evidence that the chilling process began? ❑Yes ❑No 2) If temperature is<0°C,are there obvious signs that the integrity of sample containers is compromised? (e.g.,bulging septa, broken/cracked bottles,frozen solid?) ❑Yes ❑ No NOTE: If yes,contact PM before proceeding. If no,proceed with login Additional Comments Document:CF-LG-WI-002 Revision:23 General temperature criteria is 0 to 6°C Date:12/31/2017 TestAmerica-Cedar Falls Bacteria temperature criteria is 0 to 10°C Page 71 of 73 3/12/2019 TestAmericaCedar Falls Division Phone 319-277-2401 or 800-750-2401 704 Enterprise Drive Fax 319-277-2425 To assist us in using the proper analytical methods, L Cedar Falls,IA 50613 is this work being conducted for regulatory purposes? THE LEADER IN ENVIRONME TAL TESTING Compliance Monitoring \D,, ,. 1� Client Name: �h.��✓`i�.� Client#: �� ($00 i'te ter cf rug- c e�r�F ' ` Sfil Address: Project Name: I ' 2J� LUG w*t 1 ( J City/State/Zip Code: it l IN1L'1/41\1 I Project#: 13 560? " 000 3 i 0. ` ) /� ti t .= Project Manager: AI 1 1‘111 Lh•e,1)k•-jjet 0-O% ;t.1 `, ,r,C Site/Location ID: 6 ro in0 , iM State: !i tJ I Email Address: (It\*S1:d �^� �-,./. ,eC1Mc 1 't'A® 1L- k\cI�tG�'`^ Report To: 1"hLttj���,�,f-. Li '�' ...ns—y Pc 4 Telephone Number: G I Z go/ G. I Fax: Invoice To: Me.1(I g Sa. LAJ 14 44 Sampler Name:(Print Name) C--e> h -"eY'"` j Quote#: Km.. t Sampler Signature: Idler k Matrix Preservation&#of Containers A e For: T m / QC Deliverables E Standard i g yZ _None g. Rush(surcharges may apply) g N ,� 3— .s! Level 2 (� ���333 /�Q a ► (Batch OC) 1 Date Needed: 1 tAi o ic:-; �✓ l'-' 1 p iv _Level 3 II v o o 3 0 H Level 4 Fax Results: Y N o- a U m a m 17) E E . •m § x o (� • 'i . `J ` • Other: Email Results: N 3 = R a 2 :06 /� 33 REMARKS N SAMPLE ID o F. c7 it 3 i Coi z i z W aao�-25' 1025 R3 - x x X x go11 ') S.-lo\ (105 _ 3_ -. X X x x i R- 7 15-Za` llz4 . --_ a 2 -- X x X K �$ 15-t9o5' 1 z S - 3 - 3 _ L rl 9•-to' 133o - x o 0-5` 153 -- a 3X 7( ---- =Io 3Iill� 100GW --- a --- - — X x X ' (=i i - '-- c 4 Special Instructions: :751V .'- /-/ / LABORATORY COMMENTS:r„,,.,f. ," TestAmerica Minneapolis SC / 213 .: f. Relin,wished By Dat : Tifie`�� Rbtety dBy: afe�/i r Til{ie!l5 z :£ w R 2 y: t I Rece`weil y ate: rime: Y N Relinquished By: Date: Time: Received By: Date: Time: r. . a Iv TAL-0033(0708) O co Page 1 of Login Sample Receipt Checklist Client:Wenck Associates, Inc Job Number: 310-150364-1 SDG Number: B5503-0003 Login Number: 150364 List Source:TestAmerica Cedar Falls List Number: 1 ' } Creator: Bindert, Lindsay A Question Answer Comment Radioactivity wasn't checked or is</=background as measured by a survey N/A meter. The cooler's custody seal, if present, is intact. True Sample custody seals, if present, are intact. N/A The cooler or samples do not appear to have been compromised or True tampered with. Samples were received on ice. True Cooler Temperature is acceptable. True Cooler Temperature is recorded. True COC is present. True COC is filled out in ink and legible. True COC is filled out with all pertinent information. True Is the Field Sampler's name present on COC? True c There are no discrepancies between the containers received and the COC. True Samples are received within Holding Time(excluding tests with immediate True HTs) Sample containers have legible labels. True EEI ontainers are not broken or leaking. True Sample collection date/times are provided. True Appropriate sample containers are used. True Sample bottles are completely filled. True Sample Preservation Verified. True There is sufficient vol.for all requested analyses, incl. any requested True MS/MSDs Containers requiring zero headspace have no headspace or bubble is True <6mm(1/4"). Multiphasic samples are not present. True Samples do not require splitting or compositing. True Residual Chlorine Checked. N/A TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 73 of 73 3/12/2019 '` d _, f . y «;' El TestAmerica „ :'1,`” •41',: :Of-, i ;::i 11111111111111111=111111111111111111111110111.11111111.111 .l d id THE LEADER IN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING t,t" t rt ,; ' ,, ANALYTICAL REPORT TestAmerica Laboratories, Inc. TestAmerica Cedar Falls ` ' 704 Enterprise Drive ' Cedar Falls, IA 50613 Tel: (319)277-2401 x ;gTestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-2 _ _OPIPP°r - TestAmerica Sample Delivery Group: B5503-0003 . Client Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows - Orono, MN For: Wenck Associates, Inc F 1802 Wooddale Drive Suite 100 f . Woodbury, Minnesota 55125 ' � Attn: Michelle Horfield f . 6,,,,id„,14(0.d i i i?i„. 33Y,, d to .d u € w*, 3 ##� Authorized for release by:J4II 3/19/2019 1:50:42 PM Angela Muehling, Project Manager II , angela.muehling©testamericainc.com rDesignee for1 Zach Bindert, Project Manager (319)227-2401 71 �i4 ,, zach.bindert©testamericainc.com LINKS Review your project l results through TOta1 Access : ,. j •E f Have a Question? Ask— Th e This report has been electronically signed and authorized by the signatory.Electronic signature is intended to be the legally binding equivalent of a traditionally handwritten signature. exLei __ _a__ Results relate only to the items tested and the sample(s)as received by the laboratory. d Visit us at:.,,,,-,-= www.testamericainc.com Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-2 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 El • Table of Contents Cover Page 1 Table of Contents 2 Case Narrative 3 Sample Summary 4 Detection Summary 5 Client Sample Results 6 Definitions 11 QC Sample Results 12 QC Association 13 Chronicle 14 Certification Summary 15 Method Summary 16 Chain of Custody 17 Receipt Checklists 22 Page 2 of 22 TestAmerica3/19/2Cedar 019 Falls Case Narrative Client: Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-2 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows- Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Job ID: 310-150364-2 Laboratory: TestAmerica Cedar Falls Narrative Job Narrative 310-150364-2 Comments No additional comments. Receipt The samples were received on 3/5/2019 10:05 AM;the samples arrived in good condition, properly preserved and, where required, on ice. The temperatures of the 2 coolers at receipt time were 0.4°C and 1.3°C. Metals No analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described in the Definitions/Glossary page. Organic Prep No analytical or quality issues were noted, other than those described in the Definitions/Glossary page. TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 3 of 22 3/19/2019 Sample Summary t' K Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-2 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Matrix Collected Received 310-150364-2 B-6 22.5-25' Soil 03/01/19 10:25 03/05/19 10:05 4 310-150364-3 B-7 5-10' Soil 03/01/19 11:05 03/05/19 10:05 310-150364-4 B-7 15-20' Soil 03/01/19 11:20 03/05/19 10:05 310-150364-5 B-8 15-17.5' Soil 03/01/19 12:15 03/05/19 10:05 , 'w 310-150364-6 B-9 9-10' Soil 03/01/19 13:50 03/05/19 10:05 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 4 of 22 3/19/2019 Detection Summary Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-2 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-6 22.5-25' Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-2 CNo Detections. Client Sample ID: B-7 5-10' Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-3 0 No Detections. Client Sample ID: B-7 15-20' Lab Sample ID: 310-1503644 No Detections. Client Sample ID: B-8 15-17.5' Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-5 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type Lead 0.273 0.100 mg/L 1 6010D TCLP Client Sample ID: B-9 9-10' Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-6 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit Dil Fac D Method Prep Type Lead 0.123 0.100 mg/L 1 6010D TCLP This Detection Summary does not include radiochemical test results. TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 5 of 22 3/19/2019 Client Sample Results Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-2 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 ;tient Sample ID: B-6 22.5-25' Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-2 Date Collected:03/01/19 10:25 Matrix:Soil Date Received:03/05/19 10:05 Method:6010D-Metals(ICP)-TCLP 111 Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Lead <0.100 0.100 mg/L 03/15/19 09:34 03/18/19 13:43 1 6 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 6 of 22 3/19/2019 Client Sample Results Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-2 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-7 5-10' Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-3 Date Collected:03/01/19 11:05 Matrix:Soil Date Received:03/05/19 10:05 Method: 6010D-Metals(ICP)-TCLP Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Chromium <0.0200 0.0200 mg/L 03/15/19 09:34 03/18/19 13:50 1 c Lead <0.100 0.100 mg/L 03/15/19 09:34 03/18/19 13:50 1 6 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 7 of 22 3/19/2019 Client Sample Results Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-2 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 :Tient Sample ID: B-7 15-20' Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-4 Date Collected:03/01/19 11:20 Matrix:Soil Date Received: 03/05/19 10:05 Method:6010D-Metals(ICP)-TCLP Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Lead <0.100 0.100 mg/L 03/15/19 09:34 03/18/19 13:51 1 6 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 8 of 22 3/19/2019 Client Sample Results Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-2 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-8 15-17.5' Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-5 Date Collected:03/01/19 12:15 Matrix:Soil Date Received:03/05/19 10:05 Method: 6010D-Metals(ICP)-TCLP Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Lead 0.273 0.100 mg/L 03/15/19 09:34 03/18/19 13:53 1 6 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 9 of 22 3/19/2019 Client Sample Results Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-2 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 ;Tient Sample ID: B-9 9-10' Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-6 Date Collected: 03/01/19 13:50 Matrix:Soil Date Received:03/05/19 10:05 Method:6010D-Metals(ICP)-TCLP Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac 4a Lead 0.123 0.100 mg/L 03/15/19 09:34 03/18/19 13:58 1 6 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 10 of 22 3/19/2019 Definitions/Glossary Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-2 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Glossary Abbreviation These commonly used abbreviations may or may not be present in this report. a Listed under the"D"column to designate that the result is reported on a dry weight basis %R Percent Recovery s`. CFL Contains Free Liquid V�. CNF Contains No Free Liquid DER Duplicate Error Ratio(normalized absolute difference) Dil Fac Dilution Factor DL Detection Limit(DoD/DOE) DL,RA,RE,IN Indicates a Dilution,Re-analysis,Re-extraction,or additional Initial metals/anion analysis of the sample DLC Decision Level Concentration(Radiochemistry) EDL Estimated Detection Limit(Dioxin) LOD Limit of Detection(DoD/DOE) LOQ Limit of Quantitation(DoD/DOE) MDA Minimum Detectable Activity(Radiochemistry) MDC Minimum Detectable Concentration(Radiochemistry) MDL Method Detection Limit ML Minimum Level(Dioxin) NC Not Calculated ND Not Detected at the reporting limit(or MDL or EDL if shown) PQL Practical Quantitation Limit QC Quality Control RER Relative Error Ratio(Radiochemistry) RL Reporting Limit or Requested Limit(Radiochemistry) RPD Relative Percent Difference,a measure of the relative difference between two points TEF Toxicity Equivalent Factor(Dioxin) TEQ Toxicity Equivalent Quotient(Dioxin) TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 11 of 22 3/19/2019 QC Sample Results Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-2 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method: 6010D - Metals (ICP) ,Lab Sample ID: LB 310-232553/1-B Client Sample ID:Method Blank Matrix:Solid Prep Type:TCLP Analysis Batch:232882 Prep Batch:232588 LB LB Analyte Result Qualifier RL MDL Unit D Prepared Analyzed Dil Fac Chromium <0.0200 0.0200 mg/L 03/15/19 09:34 03/18/19 13:40 1 Lead <0.100 0.100 mg/L 03/15/19 09:34 03/18/19 13:40 1 Lab Sample ID: LCS 310-232553/2-B Client Sample ID: Lab Control Sample Matrix:Solid Prep Type:TCLP 8 Analysis Batch:232882 Prep Batch:232588 Spike LCS LCS %Rec. Analyte Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Chromium 2.00 1.807 mg/L 90 80_120 Lead 4.00 3.845 mg/L 96 80_120 Lab Sample ID:310-150364-2 MS Client Sample ID: B-6 22.5-25' Matrix:Soil Prep Type:TCLP Analysis Batch:232882 Prep Batch: 232588 Sample Sample Spike MS MS %Rec. Analyte Result Qualifier Added Result Qualifier Unit D %Rec Limits Chromium <0.0200 2.00 1.896 mg/L 95 75_125 Lead <0.100 4.00 3.890 mg/L 97 75_125 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 12 of 22 3/19/2019 QC Association Summary Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-2 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Metals Leach Batch:232553 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-150364-2 B-6 22.5-25' TCLP Soil 1311 310-150364-3 B-7 5-10' TCLP Soil 1311 310-150364-4 B-715-20' TCLP Soil 1311 310-150364-5 B-8 15-17.5' TCLP Soil 1311 310-150364-6 B-9 9-10' TCLP Soil 1311 LB 310-232553/1-B Method Blank TCLP Solid 1311 LCS 310-232553/2-B Lab Control Sample TCLP Solid 1311 310-150364-2 MS B-6 22.5-25' TCLP Soil 1311 Prep Batch: 232588 9 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-150364-2 B-6 22.5-25' TCLP Soil 3010A 232553 310-150364-3 B-7 5-10' TCLP Soil 3010A 232553 310-150364-4 B-715-20' TCLP Soil 3010A 232553 310-150364-5 B-8 15-17.5' TCLP Soil 3010A 232553 310-150364-6 B-9 9-10' TCLP Soil 3010A 232553 LB 310-232553/1-B Method Blank TCLP Solid 3010A 232553 LCS 310-232553/2-B Lab Control Sample TCLP Solid 3010A 232553 310-150364-2 MS B-6 22.5-25' TCLP Soil 3010A 232553 .. Analysis Batch: 232882 Lab Sample ID Client Sample ID Prep Type Matrix Method Prep Batch 310-150364-2 B-6 22.5-25' TCLP Soil 6010D 232588 310-150364-3 B-7 5-10' TCLP Soil 6010D 232588 310-150364-4 B-7 15-20' TCLP Soil 6010D 232588 310-150364-5 8-8 15-17.5' TCLP Soil 6010D 232588 310-150364-6 B-9 9-10' TCLP Soil 6010D 232588 LB 310-232553/1-B Method Blank TCLP Solid 6010D 232588 LCS 310-232553/2-B Lab Control Sample TCLP Solid 6010D 232588 310-150364-2 MS B-6 22.5-25' TCLP Soil 6010D 232588 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 13 of 22 3/19/2019 Lab Chronicle Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-2 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Client Sample ID: B-6 22.5-25' Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-2 Date Collected:03/01/19 10:25 Matrix:Soil Date Received:03/05/19 10:05 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared i.- .,-; Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab TCLP Leach 1311 232553 03/14/19 12:50 ERT TAL CF TCLP Prep 3010A 232588 03/15/19 09:34 HED TAL CF TCLP Analysis 6010D 1 232882 03/18/19 13:43 CTB TAL CF Client Sample ID: B-7 5-10' Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-3 Date Collected: 03/01/19 11:05 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 03/05/19 10:05 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared O Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab II TCLP Leach 1311 232553 03/14/19 12:50 ERT TAL CF TCLP Prep 3010A 232588 03/15/19 09:34 HED TAL CF TCLP Analysis 6010D 1 232882 03/18/19 13:50 CTB TAL CF Client Sample ID: B-7 15-20' Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-4 F* Date Collected: 03/01/19 11:20 Matrix:Soil ':`» ` Date Received:03/05/19 10:05 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab TCLP Leach 1311 232553 03/14/19 12:50 ERT TAL CF TCLP Prep 3010A 232588 03/15/19 09:34 HED TAL CF TCLP Analysis 6010D 1 232882 03/18/19 13:51 CTB TAL CF Client Sample ID: B-8 15-17.5' Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-5 Date Collected: 03/01/19 12:15 Matrix: Soil Date Received: 03/05/19 10:05 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab TCLP Leach 1311 232553 03/14/19 12:50 ERT TAL CF TCLP Prep 3010A 232588 03/15/19 09:34 HED TAL CF TCLP Analysis 6010D 1 232882 03/18/19 13:53 CTB TAL CF Client Sample ID: B-9 9-10' Lab Sample ID: 310-150364-6 Date Collected:03/01/19 13:50 Matrix:Soil Date Received:03/05/19 10:05 Batch Batch Dilution Batch Prepared Prep Type Type Method Run Factor Number or Analyzed Analyst Lab TCLP Leach 1311 232553 03/14/19 12:50 ERT TAL CF TCLP Prep 3010A 232588 03/15/19 09:34 HED TAL CF TCLP Analysis 6010D 1 232882 03/18/19 13:58 CTB TAL CF Laboratory References: TAL CF=TestAmerica Cedar Falls,704 Enterprise Drive,Cedar Falls,IA 50613,TEL(319)277-2401 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 14 of 22 3/19/2019 Accreditation/Certification Summary Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID: 310-150364-2 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Laboratory: TestAmerica Cedar Falls Unless otherwise noted,all analytes for this laboratory were covered under each accreditation/certification below. Authority Program EPA Region Identification Number Expiration Date Minnesota NELAP 5 019-999-319 12-31-19 The following analytes are included in this report,but the laboratory is not certified by the governing authority. This list may include analytes for which the agency does not offer certification. Analysis Method Prep Method Matrix Analyte TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 15 of 22 3/19/2019 Method Summary Client:Wenck Associates, Inc TestAmerica Job ID:310-150364-2 Project/Site: Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN SDG: B5503-0003 Method Method Description Protocol Laboratory 6010D Metals(ICP) SW846 TAL CF 1311 TCLP Extraction SW846 TAL CF 3010A Preparation, Total Metals SW846 TAL CF Protocol References: SW846="Test Methods For Evaluating Solid Waste,Physical/Chemical Methods",Third Edition,November 1986 And Its Updates. Laboratory References: TAL CF=TestAmerica Cedar Falls,704 Enterprise Drive,Cedar Falls,IA 50613,TEL(319)277-2401 TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 16 of 22 3/19/2019 Bindert, Zach From: Michelle L. Hosfield <mhosfield@wenck.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2019 8:34 PM To: Bindert,Zach Subject: RE:TestAmerica EDD and report files from 310-150364-1 Eisinger Meadows - Orono, MN Zach—Can you please run TCLP lead on samples: 310- 310- 310- 310- 310- 150364-2 150364-4 150364-3 150364-5 150364-6 And TCLP chromium on sample: 310-150364-3 Thanks, Michelle L. Hosfield Environmental Scientist/Associate '' TWENCK mhosfield@wenck.com DI 651.395.5224 CI 612.807.3249 1802 Wooddale Drive I Woodbury, MN 55125 From:Zach Bindert<zach.bindert@testamericainc.com> Sent:Tuesday, March 12, 2019 4:41 PM To: Cory J.Anderson <canderson@wenck.com>; Michelle L. Hosfield <mhosfield@wenck.com> Subject:TestAmerica EDD and report files from 310-150364-1 Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN [CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.1 Hello, Attached please find the EDD and report files for job 310-150364-1; Eisinger Meadows-Orono, MN Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Thank you. Zach T Bindert Page 17 of 22 3/19/2019 Project Manager TestAmerica Cedar Falls E-mail:zach.bindert@testamericainc.com www.TestAmericainc.com h. in Reference:[310-346095] Attachments:2 El 2 Page 18 of 22 3/19/2019 TestAmerica 1111 II 11 1 1 1111 11 11 1 THE LEADER IN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING 310-150364 Chain of Custody Cooler/Sample Receipt and Temperature Log Form Client Information Client: l LA City/State: r\ ,e . P1�t�� 1(y�t( Project: Elsvncte;' Meact O )S Receipt Information Date/Time Received: 3•� , 19 )(un Received By: 0 Delivery Type: ❑UPS FedEx ❑FedEx Ground ❑US Mail ❑Spee-Dee ❑TA Courier ❑TA Field Services ❑Client Drop-off ❑Other: Condition of Cooler/Containers Sample(s)received in Cooler? [ Yes ❑No If yes: Cooler ID: Multiple Coolers? [�Yes �'IQb�1161f yes: Cooler# I of ,� Cooler Custody Seals Present? ®Yes ❑No If yes: Cooler custody seals intact? ®Yes ❑NoEl Sample Custody Seals Present? ❑Yes []No If yes: Sample custody seals intact? ❑Yes ❑No Trip Blank Present? ❑Yes > No If yes: Which VOA samples are in cooler? 1 Temperature Record Coolant: En Wet ice ❑Blue ice ❑Dry ice ❑Other: ❑NONE Thermometer ID: tA Correction Factor(°C): --t,Q. 0 •Temp Blank Temperature—If no temp blank,or temp blank temperature above criteria,proceed to Sample Container Temperature Uncorrected Temp(°C): j .:3 Corrected Temp(°C): f• •Sample Container Temperature Container type(s)used: Uncorrected Temp(°C): Corrected Temp(°C): Exceptions Noted 1) If temperature exceeds criteria,was sample(s)received same day of sampling? ❑Yes ❑No a) If yes: Is there evidence that the chilling process began? ❑Yes ❑No 2) If temperature is<0°C,are there obvious signs that the integrity of sample containers is compromised? (e.g.,bulging septa,broken/cracked bottles,frozen solid?) ❑Yes ❑No Nom: If yes,`contact PM before proceeding. If no,proceed with login Additional Comments Document:CF-LG-WI-002 Revision:23 General temperature criteria is 0 to 6°C Date:12/31/2017 TestAmerica-Cedar Falls Bacteria temperature criteria is 0 to 10°C Page 19 of 22 3/19/2019 e Testmer• Place COC� a scanning labelhere THE LEADER IN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING - 1 Cooler/Sample Receipt and Temperature Log Form Client Information 4 4 Client: WU( t—.j I City/State: map kr , Ptats\l mK Project: ' 5".x-t tiC,— l itt?Gifto S Receipt Information Date/Time Received: 3,5, 19 )()Qtt Received By: lic I Delivery Type: ❑UPS at FedEx ❑ FedEx Ground ❑US Mail LI Spee-Dee ❑TA Courier U TA Field Services ❑Client Drop-off ❑Other: Condition of Cooler/Containers i Sample(s) received in Cooler? [4 Yes ❑No If yes: Cooler ID: Multiple Coolers? ®Yes oL 'is If yes: Cooler It Z of 2- I Cooler Custody Seals Present? ®Yes n No If yes: Cooler custody seals intact? N]Yes ❑No I El Sample Custody Seals Present? ❑Yes []No If yes: Sample custody seals intact? ❑Yes ❑No 1 Trip Blank Present? ril Yes [A4441"'1 ' If yes: Which VOA samples are in cooler? 1 otf( rnest'c A0i u % t0 tcUu__ , Temperature Record Coolant: ®Wet ice ❑Blue ice ❑Dry ice ❑Other: ❑NONE Thermometer ID: Correction Factor(°C): To, 0 •Temp Blank Temperature—If no temp blank,or temp blank temperature above criteria,proceed to Sample Container Temperature Uncorrected Temp(°C): 0- T Corrected Temp(°C): 0 ,+ •Sample Container Temperature Container type(s) used: Uncorrected Temp(°C): Corrected Temp(°C): Exceptions Noted 1) If temperature exceeds criteria,was sample(s)received same day of sampling? ❑Yes ❑No a) If yes: Is there evidence that the chilling process began? C Yes ❑No 2) If temperature is<0°C,are there obvious signs that the integrity of sample containers is compromised? (e.g.,bulging septa,broken/cracked bottles,frozen solid?) n Yes ❑No NOTE: If yes,contact PM before proceeding. If no,proceed with login Additional Comments Document:CF-LG-WI-002 Revision:23 General temperature criteria is 0 to 6°C Date:12/31/2017 TestAmerica-Cedar Falls Bacteria temperature criteria is 0 to 10°C Page 20 of 22 3/19/2019 • Cedar Falls Division Phone 319-277-2401 or 800-750-2401 TestAmerica 704 Enterprise Drive Fax 319-277-2425 To assist us in using the proper analytical methods, Cedar Falls,IA Drive5061is this work being conducted for regulatory purposes? ) THE LEADER IN ENVIRONMENTAL TESTING �[, � Compliance Monitoring T Client Name: (' `C. Client#: t-5 Address: C OD ‘'tO` seer Cret,16- C eArsik-OS' Project Name: ( ? " �r{ 7 1 act OW S. City/State/Zip Code: utle, ` !()\`N\� Project#: 13 Fj 5O3 60 Project Manager: np C\r'\t 1 t ` ,,�C% t,1d Site/Location ID: O ro L O / if\'`4 State: t l t y Email Address: /M IAGST4'el Ultaalt �.GiM�� c 1 v' C.R.>f°•\G-i Z`LAor`'N Report To: (It 1'e,,l(e 1'- ci- c(O t^y p Telephone Number: Gil 6.0q 3)_ 1 q Fax: Invoice To: t/'`{�j`1 l`5`.,r'(�,, t„�✓ Sampler Name:(Print Name) e..:-0,- ;-'' o,(" 4._ Quote#: PO#: Sampler Signature: Matrix Preservation&#of Containers A n e For: .) QC Deliverables T Standard !n S x 00 None Rush(surcharges may apply) m 3 / Level2 N n c N ca U8. Lr N (Batch OC) Date Needed: ete it o `� rt t� O H `� Level 3 m a `i .D o 3 3 -(> �� Level 4 Fax Results: Y Q a 0 1 m u . t'-) 62- -f �{- v cEa R m o R -0 0 0 l — Other: Email Results: N = o15 a'' `. Q ',..,./ 4. �- . n O 2 ' °— �/ �`� V y 42s, "' REMARKS SAMPLE ID o F- cs IL n o s _ I z z �_ z N =C •30 —25` 102.5 ( c S --�— a 3 — X X X —~ S-log Ilos a 3 - ` x x x 11111 , C3 _ fi I5 °' ,liz� 1 _3 -- X X 'a - 15-19..5` IZ'5 , a _23 -- X X )( . q-+r�' V 10xtxo—S1 V 1536vV 4 �s — X X + II - r B-10 3111'1 (OOG G I 'Ir: a — X ©�,:,01 IIIIIHMEN I •�.,ta a int '4, — / / 7/7r . : : Special Instructions: E ` LABORATdRY"COMMENTS`° TestAmerica Minneapolis SC it 37/ / 4/417 /./5 - - R. Relin,L}ished By. 171:7/7 Tis! v dBy: �� t5j�/ Tirfte!'[fAsi d '_r s--t:,t..,t„,�:, �� ,U ��" l\ k . ic(_3"1 3.. TW R nq y: m ReceivecJ's-‘t:1--0A } Date: me: 1,1 Relinquished By: Date: Time: Received By: Date: Time: r; ,.:" g,.... `� N TAL-0033(0708) O Page of ..fl : w • m.__ .sx-.R rte a Login Sample Receipt Checklist Client:Wenck Associates,Inc Job Number:310-150364-2 SDG Number:B5503-0003 Login Number:150364 List Source:TestAmerica Cedar Falls List Number: 1 Creator:Bindert,Lindsay A Question Answer Comment Radioactivity wasn't checked or is<1=background as measured by a survey N/A meter. The cooler's custody seal,if present,is intact. True Sample custody seals,if present,are intact. N/A The cooler or samples do not appear to have been compromised or True tampered with. Samples were received on ice. True Cooler Temperature is acceptable. True Cooler Temperature is recorded. True COC is present. True COC is filled out in ink and legible. True COC is filled out with all pertinent information. True Is the Field Sampler's name present on COC? True There are no discrepancies between the containers received and the COC. True Samples are received within Holding Time(excluding tests with immediate True 14 HTs) Sample containers have legible labels. True ontainers are not broken or leaking. True Sample collection date/times are provided. True Appropriate sample containers are used. True Sample bottles are completely filled. True Sample Preservation Verified. True There is sufficient vol.for all requested analyses,incl.any requested True MS/MSD5 Containers requiring zero headspace have no headspace or bubble is True <6mm(1/4"). Multiphasic samples are not present. True Samples do not require splitting or compositing. True Residual Chlorine Checked. N/A TestAmerica Cedar Falls Page 22 of 22 3/19/2019 Appendix B Planned Engineering Drawings (Ryan Engineering, March 2019) o mo.rN,eanr.�w PRELIMINARY PLANS For EISINGER FLATS Orono, Minnesota w p.. x ❑ it - .:r a.•r,..�.. -.. ro , S:p � m I, o OWNER $ _ WP ',* LAKEW: EST,LLC 14525 e 265 g ' i M ., Aroeto*a,M" a ``" (952)930-3000f . BTa f 55345 II m ........ ® a E. a ENGINEER: rI.ZZ, 8 3 •s s g ,, ,'5.....,r. U '1', i ,tV j < -__ 1.rym Ryan ��,{ "Ox `"'• '• ... .. S ♦ •r ��.,�.. LANOOEVELOFMENT SERVICES � ' 4 � 4�4w. ' •%r` P 4 iriww.ryl221-3700 errrd..a.cem � .{{'.. { � 1. td ;� 4r ��t rte,+. `2, i '. } R •Y �, M s R S_ P _A-711,i f a' y h" EISINGER FLATS SITE LOCATION MAP PRELIMINARY SUBMITTAL 3/20//9 INDEX SHEET NO. DESCRIP IRON COVER SHEET S-I EXISTING CONOIIILWS SURVEY P-I PRELIMINARY PLAT-OVERALL 100 SCALE P-2 SII£h URLITY PLAN P-S GRADING,DRAINAGE h EROSION CON IROL PLAN P-1 SKPPP-NARRAIIW ANO NOTES P-C CONSIRUCPON DETAILS:CITY OE LWONO P-S CLWSZRDL PON DETAILS-CITY GF CROWD P-] CLWSTRUC110N DETAILS-CITY O`CROWD L-1 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN .11 0 • NM lit•MOR MO na. 011.1T1 Mt R Mt lontaft Y SAW m �. _a o a Kt. WAYUTA BM) ......... _ mom te-WooK ... �...... ..... rte_ 1 rs I [n �-41 x "tit'.."' / .'3,. :T mom 1.1..N Nan NF } .. i NL W a, • a ice" 0, •r.i�i,.y f-:. 2narMr_'SW�us cram Na -''8�:�,., - _.t� .L�� /; osale 8 w j/'/ " /"-r¢-'S" . 73 Dana Dalalila.a BMW,rurMFn BY aoeemD t AssDaAta umL Daaslve a pmNSIESe Berornfront u 1,S asl .mNe It Teo.b a Amp u.Noon...Boor.,M..W.. S °0Ih r uc0sv`�'0 Matto.No.12 m �.a�'u u.r�Aap'in s' tl wit Saitoas A 4 &onto South .nox bwsaw.r us le="tOS"3a a �•./ sie t:i bµu..n..arei frol"q=rorr+te.mow r Met port of mid lat 1 Md Y Wn tl . N.!.W F.r 02 Wwor No.13.W M.vier ens r.aa N. NSD 1 mr�sp or e pit M w F ."".221 ."r Demnrt lal 1 AMMS myd r.1 N otent 11e Mwll.by Zl W of V*SO O .uow oss feet South along eold Inn al to South Ins of Mote Rohe.lb.It twee at dont males . - ' ' wad Born.aa Fest F. to . ,.a i y. MVM SBM Fab M.S15 Oro r Kea&T.: b lire m.-. i.e.aallorin .arid neno1aorY,.ofado 1"17elightto:b M.11MrleN.d'iM11 of aerqld \ O da wlbbin I CocroobaM.MM1tir of<A* durNorthern a Mi r may Oro%b the Cal N of sold let lM CrS North to blit.pH a t.y...eobf*Df Peal 11 r .e` ter..Fm D.v.hn.ri r Tramp*NN a aw. .er P ^ "'!y n-1. Ei.n lea.+. ..n Barba.Ke • : M marker fora 1 F.q.Iw• o.ars toed w~an m me soShan I 1h1.N M MIs .b MV.r wM le.above a. .a I properly,Ito 4o n of on roma Ke.e and game.Brom end ajor Neon,Bo,one v n a aw pew,.r:ef,.. N Y hwn lYn Cu aiR i avp W.aM1 .."Br ft f:-,a-i1t m rw ani mr brl.ra.rale.x nr.a.avnsi. I MIGIF. 'Bo monody portion r 1l..mprlo mu.*one Naga,of Mem Mt the I 6 Nano*Coto* .oral Blame a non 4 I ' �� .. CAMS mABMNOMUK•.erttx NCAMPION mew. �•i.�S.rPs-��,. sai. EISINGER MEADOWS EXISTING CONDITIONS S-1 ENGINEERING � si°t J 1 SERVICES,INC. '." LAKE WEST,LLC 3/20/19 ea Mt �l ......•••••••••......• y..,.ow*-u,a Ilex a+. ORONO,MN o 209 ROM ENOBEERE0 DEVELOPIENT DATA II ZONING: Ryan EMS.. t . vuo l.n...m EZONING a Engineering MINIMUM LOT REQUIREMENTS(VILLAS: uao DEVELOPMENT WAYZATA BLVD _ REAR.IOE SETBACK: 5 FEET LOT,I WETLAND BUFFER. so FEET FROM WETLAND BUFFER 86.55 Wrerlprd P aeemarE.gem _ a zgzE.wru ASE, vee¢a'''"E,orna 13741 l Exrear,MN 6331 .... 3]00 p Aad ° /'i4. r ,e �— SINGLE FAMILY VILLAS(Elslnper Meadows PreNous Approval): 1- VI dA/A AAA ��� AREA ate " NET VILLAS AREA. *Mr •non \ z� t avw I ..�' 'famo a w MULTIPLE FAMILY FLATS DATA. r` MOO. 80act Ny '` i R Metaft.,APPROVED s aa.oEEo.A "bt FELATS ER BLE Si 0 ac 1 a.l Jig 3 11 .."..o RECREATIONAL AREA na., 0 S ac a WINOrono,MNr �� y\ 1, = .1 ..am �RPROPOSEaREEAaEA ,�,� for a aawu +1 aaa,a .ate a \ II I, i I a.ase,ea�I LAKEWESr,LLC ' it ,� T PROPERTY ADDRESS No ' \ �sy `\ .5 WAYZATA e,VO WEST.ORONO.GR 55.0 »v.l. N NA/kq '`y� asmr >4"�rox"" �� _ a�.uv�� PROPERTY AREA y,,, \ N.� 1 >>b szo sr.x.0 Acx M \ MOM \ \ de.r M LEGAL DESCRIPTION p00 SEE SURVEY ...n....r.e..l w -- leaserel FFr Sclwriaa....ewe,,, cu n o... o .E .. �, Preliminary Plat ..r ® P-1 o m9 mu,e.ale611. I ��/// /���'�� !-®�� es sr®w�sis v��sr C'_r!r"'"'"'.'' A4'0�\ / $ 1PI TI �► M0 1% !y► it-- f, r 0— / P1 -•fp.1� i6 4r _n®tea k: 0 MI WWI Bea ,����.% / II�►4I�/i%/rA I _® I•� ► i T •� e®VI/ij�i • 4./,, r'0'I I// .I �I±i % SO �� gni s 1, �o`►opgair'►1 iteral s.= r " Il. I gyp:. 1„*:•/ Ryan nn�. it:►� \`\ �I°I�/o,� I I�� IIS r!r�0 �'� d ����If AZ �, � Engineering it. , .\>,J fili"0 �� itiii Ai ;I r �. �'I .s:>y u oo o.MEM EKE44,44 \./ji I,1 1 46 i or 11m .,IPor iva `r� r is iniiiP. /h� i ., A- 19656 Waterford PIii ��/14�I��,e 0�®� ..�P. r ,�e�. ��; 4. jgopg �� Z4war - s:�i Ps s� s e�:'.d��®��/ °.- it a �. EISINGER `.,`. = .I FLATS '1' I !1 Orono MN ° for + ° I I ' LAKEWEST LLC ' — \ , ; \ 1 i, ' we.ry EN,RY 1 1 ,a gEN,E'n Pramet ma rnw n...,v N,.. [gar g N = I .0.X4`0 rM PM V ti 1 ,o. sawn.OgIon N GENERAL GRADING AND DRAINAGE NOTES m.0Nrr4n swa m.r0n mr...rN,E ve rNE rar 4rur.E.r.44N:...,,-u.-mn STAMM LEGEND _ DIVORCE Preliminary RIPOSRAPISI.in MKS RINI RN MOS MID FELD-ION,PRIER CONTRACTOR SIVAS 46441111 NOWT De PORGY Of ANT=OR IPA..OPEnr,A.. a K� p� 4 .,�4� -- Grading inARO/100/2/NO En.(° „Q .rrr mNff...N �.N N..M NOM Ns..N -� 9r CONTOURS ,.S.,A 4 — Plan STORY ANO DOC 01.01Ell OR ROCO-Pliet RUMS'OR SOD RI ACCONDAIAT SON INF APPROVED Fuso owls WI.CoRNMION C le Gal AMOY IN ACCORDANCE MN RE[MR SERF LSOBWR WV — 440..04E4llON .ARFu' � – =am P-3� 0 20.am aftweateat GENERAL SWPPP REQUIREMENTS R NOTES: PART IV CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REQUIREMENTS FINAL STABILIZATION-PART N.G Rya THE CONT.CTOR AND.L SUBCONTRACTORS INVOLVED WITH A CONSTRUCTION ACM./ THE PERMITEE MUST IMPLEMENT THE E CONTRACTOR MUST ENSURE FINAL STABILIZATION OF THE SITE ACCORDING WITH THE THAT DISTURBS SPE SOIL 00..10 IMPLEMENT RED IN cPERMIT MUST SELECTED, INST LED.W"nH unBDEvEs Engineering THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION µl(S.P.MUST C.PLYWITH TTHE RELEVANT IN ANAPPROPRIATEAND..nNNSANAL MANNER THAT LS IN ENGINEERINGPRACTICES. TION wonv IN 30D DAYS AFTER FIN..i CONTRACT. IMUST conn SUBMIT OR REQUIREMENTS OF THE NATIONAL POLLUT.DISCHARGE E.INATION EM(NPDES) MAINTAINED MNUF nPPawaSPE TING FUN SITE GH roRnou OF THE SITE To ANOTHER AGENCYGENERAL PERMIT DATED AUGUST 1,20. ATION FORM MUST GO TO RE NEW ER. HE HAVTN0 JURISDICTION CONC�NN CONCER1,PAGES NING o SEOIMAND ANY n1ATON EROSION PREVENTION PRACTICES-PART IV.B. COPY OF THIS NOT/PERMIT MUST OOITICPROVIDE SWPPP TO HENEW OVORTERTORT GOVERNING 8655 Waterford 3I cwJmoL SPECIFICALLY ADDRESSES ANY REMAINING cousmucnoN ACTrvm. Excaiaer. ri '. THE PERMITTEEISI MUST PLAN VEGETATIVE BUAND FFER STRIPS,NOIOOSTTRL SLOPE GRADING. (952)221-3700 INSPECTION AM MAINTENANCE OF PART IV.E.AND OTHER CONSTRUCRON PRACTICES THAT MINIM.EROSION.NECESSARY TO COMPLY W.THIS PERMIT AND PROTECT CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY INFORMATION: WATERS OF THE THE TED IWOWWITH FLAGSSTAHES,SIGNS.ILTOFENCE ETC.I ONBTHE PROJECT SWPPP CONTACTS: PROJECT...EISINGER FLATS SITE BEFORE PROJECT TYPE:MULTI FAMILY RESIDENT... D,ORONO.MN sE]TA 2BOULEVAREROSION BUT NO LATER IRAN END OF THE NEXT WO.DAY WHEN EARTHWORK CONTRACTOR'PROJECT LOCATION 3245 WA.ATA za zm..,F� •91.9:arm NAME ACTNITIES MALL CEASE FOR AT LE.T I/DAYS.TEMPORARY CUMULATIVE S SURFACE NTS(E.G.CLEAN STREGATETOTAL SITE ACRES n.ta ACRES STOCKPILES.DEMOLITION CONC.TE ST.KPILES,S.0 STOCKPILES,AND THE NUMBER OF ACRES TO BE HO DS,PANNING LOTS ANO SIMILAR SURFACES CONTACT IMOE 1,97* Im TIDE PRE-CONSTRUCTION ACRES OF IMBPERVIOUS SURFACE 0.0 ACRES ANE EXEMPT FR.THIS REQUIREMENT. Am.99Nvn» CRS OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACE 3.52 AC.5 ] ITTEEISI MUST STABILIZE THE NORMAL WETTED PERIMETER OF ANY ea TOTALNEW IMPERVIOUS SURFACE ARA 3.52 ACRES OWNER, ANY PORTION.TIE CONSTRUCTION SITE.CR DIVERTS WATER AROUND THE SITE. LA.WEST DEVELOPMENT RECE .R0ITHIN 200 LINE,FEET FROM THE PROPER,EDGE OR FR.A POINT 0,F wE00 SPEOI WATERT IMPAIRED TBE EISINGER LAKE NN TON NO COMPLETED WATER. CONTACPERRYRVM.2 1.F CONSTRUCTION SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES-PART N.0 FLATS DATES CONSTRUCTION START DATE 07.01.19 ESTIMATED COMPLETION TOnI COM t ITTEEISI MUST EMPLOY SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTCECESSARY TO MINIMIZE SEDIMENT FR.ENTERING FACE WATERS.INCLUDINGING CURB AND CUTTERSYSTEMS AND STORM SEWER INLETS. SOIL INFORMATION Orono,MN ZSEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES MUST BE ESTABLISHED ON NJ.DOWN GIUDIENT PERIMETERS AND BE LOCATED UPGRADE/4T OF ANY BUFFER ZONES.THE PERIMETER PART III STORWATER DISCHARGE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS for MI ACTIVITIES SL iE UNTIL SINPRP IMPLEMENTATION RESP.SIBILITIES: FINAL SHLLE-INTLCLsE" COTROPnes" 1. THE OWNER ANO CONTRACTOR ARE CO-PERMITEES AS IDENTIFIE0 BY OND ] ITSTABILIZATIONHAS SEDIMENT WITH • LAKEWEST,LLC zCONTRACT.SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL ON SE IMPLEMENTATIONOF THE BEEN 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PERSON KN....FABLE AND EXPERIENCED,IN THE SHORETERM ACM.HAS BEEN COMPLETED. APPLICATION OF EROS.PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS AND OVERSEE . TEMPORARY.IL ST.KPILES MUST NA.SILT FENCE OR OTHER EFFECTIVE SEMENT ALL INST.LAT.AND MAINTENANCE 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PRON. orv(s)MEERNNG THE TRAINING REaunREMENTs • CAND CANNOT BE PLACED IN ANY NATURAL BUFFERS OR SURFACE WATERS. 111.1MI ONVEYANCES SUCH AS CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS,OR OF THE NPDES PERMIT TO CONDUCT INSPECTION AND __ krm PREVE.ON AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS IN NTs s ITTEENSO MUST INSTALL A VEHICLE TRACKING SNP TO MINIM.THE TRACH • OF THE PERM,.ONE OF THESE INSPECTION WITHIN 72 HOURS UPONINDIVIDUALS MUSTAVAILABLER or+m c*ws REQUIREMENTS OUT Of SEDIMENT DIME FR.THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. MAO o.—v Nom. PROVIOE TRAINING AND DOCUMENTATION OF PERSONNEL TO INCLUDE )lew AI. NAMES Cf PERSONNEL AS.CMTED WIT-11THE PROJECT THAT ARE REQUIRED TO BE INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE-PORT N.E nal TRAEED 42TRAINING AND NAME OF INSTRUCTOR AND ENTITY HAT FRONDED t TTEE.MUST ENSURE THAT A TRAINED PERSON WILL ROUTINELY INSPECT Peon..?7, TRAINING THE ENTIRE CONSTRUCTION SITE AT LEAST ONCE EVERY SEVEN M(7)DAYS DURINN ash 6i IM 5 FCOF HOUR Of TOWING R,THE WITHIN 2A HOURS AFTER ARMNFALL EVE alaal, PER OWNER SNAIL FURNISH LONG TERM TION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE PERMANENT 2 CONDUCTED DURING CONSTRUCTION MUST BFTAINED MINnAIAF�N2NrB STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM DANCE WITH NIILE RECORDED`WITHIN 24 HOURS 1N GD THESE RECORDS MUST THE SWF).IN RECORDS RETENTION-PART III.E 3 RMITTEEOSISTI/ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INSPECTION AND MNNTEANCE OF TEMPORARY ENTION ANC SEDIMENT CONTROL BAIPSNTIL ANOTHER PERMITTEE HAS THE PP ORIGINAL OR COPIES)INCLUDING,EALL RCN.wcEs To rt.AND INSPECTIONS APERMANENT WATER DUALITY II.AGEMENT MPS,AS WE.AS.L ND OBTAINED COVERAGE PROJECT HAS UNDERGONE UNDER THISFIN.STABILIZATION,IN AC AND AN NOT Hao BEEN&BOR THEMITTED To 0 MAINTENANCE RECORDS MUST BE.PT AT TTEIBI WHOHASNAVE OPERATIONAL CONTROL OF THAE DURING APORON or HE SITE.THE J SWPPP CANEI<EPTNEITHER THEFE.OFFICE OR IN AN ONSITE VEHICLE DURING NORM HE UPCA WORKING HOURS ONGOING CONSTRRATION REAS MUST BE INSPECTEDTIVITY S REACHING THENSURE THAT NO SEDIMENT FROM UTION ALL OWTALOFNE.SI MUST KEEP HE FOLLOWNG RECORDS ON FILE FORHREE III YEARS AFTER DRIVEN ACROSS THE INFILTRATION AREA ENSURE HATEWIPMENTSNOL BEING `'N � __. ' „j ......AD Cate INFILTRATIONNARE.MUSTCBE INSPECTED TO THE N — IINKled r, SUBMIT AFTER SUBMITTAL OF HE NOT EO NPART c.HIS DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY RECORDS POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT-PART IVF - THE NOT AS M M1Hw 7�_�� nn r Adv L ♦HEFINAL SWSPP HE PERMITTEEISI SHALL IMPLEMENT THE FOLLOWNG POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT 2. ANY OTHER FOR THE PROJECT MEASU.S ON THE SIT, LEA � EOF PERMITS E OND QTEDDGRrvGQON CONSTRUCTION OEORPo MUST 3. � BPEDGN5NOMAINTENANCE) _ :,:f � SWPPPOFPROPERTY AND COMPLY SAL REQUIREMENTS. A. L PERMANENT OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS HAHAVE BEEN ""n* n ALL HAZARDOUS MATERIALS IOLGASOLINE.PAWL ANY HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCESI IMPLEMENTED.INCLUDING ALL RIGHT.....CONTRACTS.COVEN.TS AND OTHER MUST BE PROPERLY STO.D TO PREVENT SPILLS.LEAKS OR Narrative and BINDING REQUIREMENTS REGARDING PERPETUAL MAINTENANCE ANDS. ALL REQUIRED CALCULATIONS FOR OF THE TEMPORARY AroPERMANEN. POSOUOFHAZARDOUSWASTEMUSTBE SS TO STORAGE AREAS MUST BE COOMO.PP E TTSPCA" Notes STORMY/ATERMANAGEMENTSYSTEMS. STORAGE ] TTEEISI MUST PROVIDE EFFECT. CONTAINMENT FOR.L LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES.NERATED...HO. OPERATIONS.THE LBSUID AND SOLKO W.HOUT WASTES MUST NOT CONTACT 71. GROUND,AND THE CONTAINMENT MUST BE DESIGNED SO THAT IT DOES NOT.SULT N immiRUNOFF FR.THE WASHOUT OPERATIONS AREA.LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES MUST BE 4 liGOPH STATE Em* OW LW. UTILIZE WA=TE5 PROPER FACILITIES FOR DISPOSAL OF CONCRETE AND OTHER WASHOUT P-4 0 20.RIN1130/1103110 RYV1 Engineering LAND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES B.— -...* .417..M.: r—=Sz--•- 41655 Wateriord PI - Excelalor,AN 55331,,.z -7---, a I II . t 1 ............. (052)221-3700 ,,,,,.................. j .'°61;witu'il.%• ../1 t Ili.11 ' f I "F"' Ei-r-...="7:" 1 "-::::::0,,,;i::::' rr,...-.• / Etv-71:141 : !.; •.4r A...I...... wi ' ...... ( I I , MIX,--... --7.- .............-- A ' T.Z.,' Ili .: i 1 ...... ............ ---11''''''. ......,.. ....... ,..... hoi......-..-=. 1"41111r .,... .....r.:::""":-Tr.,. ; v..:•:•:.: ,:•...... ....... „,, i i "'"'""7.7"" '. ••,•;,;;„:,"• i === EISINGER r....11! 1-- ..,== =er- - L.n. ' !' I ... ''''''''',::=,, ..-............... ...... ••••••••••.............• —=4,-..71";===- Oro r14:),MN ......... _.._, ..7_74., ,,,w . for .„.„„.,,,, p.....L ,ek :171. 1,:":*.t, lama wencos 1::::, ift*t, ..,r,,,=.. -77: tiie*i. • ,,,,..... r...";:. &MGR Pr, 411141 rktvZ t-W LAKEWEST,LLC ‘'Wfr•-• .. _ moo WI/ ----- --- .--. .,,,.,. . .... ...„:„....„...„ ,.. ...... ....,..,.. -===. • "— rz:-.1.-zr. 6 112.1-'::.:".3 ' r=" .. :,,........ MI ..... ........-„,....,,. ...„-r---• -..** ---0'L ..-(--..›,-,---,•„--,----;,- , 11,. 1 1 ..... •,.. . 3.. ,...• ..,......./0 Ng^ .., *sm..---- .• ..0/ WM 0.0........* e0 0/04"0 16... . " 4=4:14 001.1010C OM , c '.la , . ._........ .... _,, ,..„................ MAU••••••••,40.0.0 00...• ......===.11 •00.0./...., .0,..... 0/Y./101.1t1/00 11040020/1,0.59. i , :::::?=' .Flar1=7": ":"7.7."'" ...._, , ......... 1....,,,............,,,...-....., • . a=":".:0: ............................ :FL"'F.-1,77/4 ET-7:1"Z.---i---.7.--•„ , , , —.. , ------ . I , '=•=Z:r ........... . catqam.I.,2 • in1gliftr—Dar_ .' onx••• . .Faruha'7=''...."'.".'.'''''.'...'' l',......,,, A '' Beira Odpn Omen 00.1.00,../ Pramliory* I......../...... wci reba R... M.. :4:: ' ,k .-2= 401 +6 " 4" ' '. 4 ..- ..F . I . D...,et.a, ils -... P-5 o m.er.H aeleelelKI Ryan Engineering LAND DVALOPM00,PVICES 7ft . . ,10 , . '°" ' elsior MN 55331 .___ ._......,., - =--:::.-z. k t a9 7a (602)22i7aoe� .>� .. ap iR�_� =.........., �il55 Waterford PI rye ..x r_7427,=-1 ===== =.-............: I L.---.-..:=7:. .r....742,. i.......,.. =,...r=tr_ 11116, �........., ate— MI _ . IPI mr ... iros e m"' FLATS EISINGER . I -:011111M) I i�m1 Orono,MN -T-"_„,.......--� S... >• .. rc(i ="17%.7.4..-,. ,c. o�M s__ ., n..nerm for .........' — �� °a -.7... oil' ro d. ,. --Tr-- -... 1 1 wrKeE.'°.u.a"� ... � , moE.En.eremao LAKEWEST,LLC ...,; .«n.ws.a.M.ne �e swr..s.aa.c�a.wa. _ .... arm 1�'_, r'.i z.. 1l 111 al ---- 91tJ7 0 MP ' Bis —..--� [àLI -- ! i rartr. m. ifs$__ b.-.-.. eche*OW. Prelninary lin. _ Eliddnp _ a ..�...m..E.m .,m.a.�a,M.,o.w..EE w,o , _ E..� y ' ... ' J ... I've` sr. Details P-6 O 2012 m,w e3,13w Rya Engineering MO°EVE L0.0.1.SEMMES _ _ 111 ..— ness Waterford n 3i+ jJ Exodror,a 552031 — `L _an.n_..v_...nm ` f{�R f ` Ftf° „� — (952)221-3700 y y{ ._ — { EISINGER { `.• i K=1.7=17=,� ��>'. __.. FLATS - ¢. i Z. ,.... . *"4�x' ray:o�_.._ OronoAIN °4°io Ws d� ..._ _... e.O'�c am«v..°,..aa °`�O"�° for u+.„«M. 120 4 .tc r MY=MO WWI ..o.uw GLAND .vw.a.�en7077 4111, �... SP.0.1kana a LAKEWEBT LLC MI 'O e: I ®.,...:.. 7. ,12.....,12.... ��C ••••,—"••••••"" . .. a 1- . ........ ri�.,,..>a mom song .. , �t�l Jawed Fa- .j ( rte."�.,,.o _... . . Dactemac Nog a• 4fi.` Details raw P-7 o m er..enD.®.o / Preliminary Plant Schedule//�� I \1 m...m er. ra. .a.i Appendix C Architectural Plans (Collage Architects, March 2019) / . r ` ..N INIIIIIIIIIIII II EAST . ., _,. .r.. _ .� STUDIO 11 ONE BEDROOM 65 / ONE BEDROOM+DEN 3 TWO BEDROOM 36 . I 915 py ".I / . . _... _ __. WEST. STUDIO 9 1" 'I ALCOVE BEDROOM 13 / { I ONE BEDROOM 70 ONE BEDROOM•DEN 6 / fi TWO BEDROOM 31 / ' 129 _ _ / .s re ,,, I TOTAL UNITS:244 -------- \ 397 STALLS PARKING COUNT: / EAST GARAGE:109 STALLS / ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN WEST GARAGE 127 STALLS L \ 154•=1'-0' SITE:181 STALLS EISINGER FLATS � 7 ORONO,MN dr.= Collage I architects MARCH.20.2019 59.-9" 85'-0" 316'-3" '.. STUDIO • ♦ / / 1U9 ar• ar• ar. ALCOVE BEDROOM I UNIT TYPE IOTYI BF NMIEAST NM ONE BEDROOM - UNITA STUDIO 8 587 ONE BEDROOM+DEN UNIT A2 STUDIO 3 615 UWE TWO BEDROOM a UNIT D STUDIO 1 681 MISIZI COMMONS 11' xriti - UNITF ONE BEDROOM 6 733 UNITG ONE BEDROOM 50' 677 ♦ JL ., JL AL .. JL .� UNIT G2 ONE BEDROOM 2 681 UNIT G9 ONE BEDROOM 4 900 272'_5" - • a +DEN - 1 UNIT J ONE BEDROOM 2 .677 n - UNIT K ONE BEDROOM 3 839 ,o m +DEN>. ;6]I UNIT TWO BEDROOM 3 954 7 -- - ---- - ♦ UNIT N..TWO BEDROOM-18 1050 ♦ • Mr_ .. 'Y M. .:,.... ... ♦ 74'-0" UNIT O TWO BEDROOM 8 1150 , 'E:_. / / UNIT O2TWO BEDROOM 3 1150 UNIT 03 TWO BEDROOM 1 1150 UNIT P TWO BEDROOM 3 1408 I IIIMINIMIIIII_ _ _ EAST:115 n r.3.' WEST UNIT A STUDIO - 4 587 _s__—• AL •• •• JL L-- -- UNIT B ALCOVE` -3 794 BEDROOM UNIT C STUDIO 2 556 UNIT D STUDIO 4 681 / / UNITE ALCOVE 10 570 _ +. BEDROOM UNIT F ONE BEDROOM 9 888- UNIT G ONE BEDROOM 39 677`. 427 8" 1 UNIT G2 ONE BEDROOM 2 681 n • 7 UNIT G4 ONE BEDROOM 2 900 Mr. Ki sir • ar rr. . . 1.1 .. ar :1 _ UNITH ONE BEDROOM 6 740 L�- „' - UNITI ONE BEDROOM 11 740 ` V UNIT ONE BEDROOM 3 839 F +DEN I $•� A N UNIT ONE BEDROOM 3 910 +DEN n AIx; _ UNIT M TWOEDROOM 3 954 UNIT N TWO BEDROOM 12 1131 ♦ JL..... -:JL .: AL .. J•L UNITO TWO BEDROOM 12 1150 496'-7" UNIT P TWO BEDROOM 3 1408 / -- —--- / UNIT 0 TWO BEDROOM 1 677 WEST:129 1ST FLOOR PLAN 5S EISINGER FLATS 10 ORONO,MN ..a Collage I architects MARCH.20.2019 59'-9" BS-0" 316'-3" .=i STUDIO ` - ,• IF .. 76 • .. 7R .. IF • ---. \ -ALCOVE BEDROOM ONE BEDROOM -ONE BEDROOM*DEN •o PNO BEDROOM n • ';+rg p 11COMMONS I 0 - ` -,.y,. JL ow .. ,L .. JL n 272'-5" 7 1 h11 / i 156.-5" 74.-0" m . 427' 8" - 1 M• a IF • 1j,. IF , Ir Ir •• Ir. I■ r.4 ,,. ,. __. JL_. •• __Mil •• ME • .. AN .. JL • t.•• ON •• 7L \ 496'-7" / 2ND FLOOR PLAN 1._50,0' EISINGER FLATS fir ORONO,MN Collage I architects MARCH.20,2019 _ 317'-3" • ji • I ,STUDIO : Mr. •• Mr-1V-Mr. •• Mr--•-• _ -ALCOVE BEDROOM / . -ONE BEDROOM 11 ONE BEDROOM+DEN 7 al -TWO BEDROOM p.4 /.. wr, 10 AA s / Ar. . . .7.. . . .. . . . • '''' 1 : ._ 273' 2" • a w . • & °;, 1 _ If , _„___LL mr-• , ti ,,,..-- '0 . — ui , , . i . ii. . i . . •i• .. . , / --tmi--- ---ut, • [ . - . ill ;4 . '''-'-'. . ' - ' ' .' •-' • . - i . , • am - Aft - Aw___.,___— Am •• wiL__IIIIL._-- mu •• am •*- - - • I, , / 3RD FLOOR PLAN EISINGER FLATS 0 --2 Collage 1 archiORONO,MN, tects MARCH.20.2019 MO/20181215 27 PKI • MATERIAL INDEX © m MO m © m 09W 9 ® © © 9 © m m 1 ROCK FACE BLOCK(COLOR TBD) 2 MODULAR FACE BRICK(COLOR TBD) 3 CAST STONE SILL(COLOR TBD) 4 FIBERCEMENT PANEL(PREFINISHEDCOLOR:TERRACOTTA- Milig:Egolli „,, MT! e;;;;;;;;; NIB 6 FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING 6”(PREFINISHED COLOR:LIGHT GREY-SMOOTH) ■ '■ ■ ■ 1 I ■ ■ II 1■ ■I FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING 6",3"(PREFINISHED COLOR _I I_ • I I_ ■I, I■ • I I. • 1■� 6 CHARCOAL GREY-SMOOTH) 7 FIBER CEMENT WINDOW TRIM(PREFINISHED COLOR.WHITE) I■.■1 ■ ■ ■1 I I I■ ■ ■ I■I',■1 I■ ■I I • I■'■I 8 PREFINISHED ALUMINUM BALCONY W/MTL GUARDRAIL (PICKET,BLACK)TYP. '� ii si .. Q 9 ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM(COLOR:BLACK) r -n'n n�� .,..., 10 VINYL WINDOWS(COLOR:BLACK) 11 ALUMINUM FRAMED BALCONY SCREEN WITH INFILL PANEL BUILDING W-NORTH ELEVATION BUILDING W-SOUTH ELEVATION 2 12 ASPHALT ROOF SHINGLES(COLOR CHARCOAL) 364•_': 5 9 © 11 0 mII © II0 9 9 0 09 0 © ® Om11 -1 I !I! _ i-1_I • DOC-1'WpE1111 , L1.1 L1.1 •I11110 11 s 11ED , I_LI 1.. X1! 1 I! !I! ! !I! ! ■I! ■ ■ 1 1! ! ! !1 1 ■ ■ !I! Ian !I! ■ ■ I I! ! ! I11 1 IF ■ !I! ! I6 I!'I !I I !I! ! !I! ! !I! • ■ !I I ! ! I I! ■ • !I! !!!! !I! • • ■I I ! ! II I! ■ • !I! ! I! BUILDING W--WEST ELEVATION 3/64..1.-o* CI m Il ® 0 0© 0 mG MO CO 9® 9 9 CIMOMD© © WO o © WO :1: ! ITE 'DI :::i■ ■ : . mill ! U',1=== 00 1-I!I:11■ ■ ,-I!I! I! !I !o! • I I! !! !I I • • !I! !!!! !I! • • I is !! !I I • i !I! !I! !! 11! I! !I !III I �0 II! • !I 1 !! I I! ■ ■ !1! !!!! !I! • • !I I !! I I! ■ ■ !I! !I! 1 '!I'I I! !I 1 IP IWIALZIM p BUILDING W-EAST ELEVATION , , , , , - ,-,--_ - 3/64•=1-0• II'' EISINGER FLATS ORONO,MN J Collage I architects MARCH.20.2019 MATERIAL INDEX 1 ROCK FACE BLOCK(COLOR'.TBD) 2 MODULAR FACE BRICK(COLOR TBD) 3 CAST STONE SILL(COLOR:TBD) 4 FIBER CEMENT PANEL(PREFINISHED COLOR TERRACOTTA- SMOOTH) 5 FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING 6"(PREFINISHED COLOR.LIGHT GREY-SMOOTH) 6 FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING 6",3"(PREFINISHED COLOR: CHARCOAL GREY-SMOOTH) 7 FIBER CEMENT WINDOW TRIM(PREFINISHED COLOR WHITE) 8 PREFINISHED ALUMINUM BALCONY W/MTL GUARDRAIL (PICKET.BLACK)TYP. 9 ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM(COLOR.BLACK) 10 VINYL WINDOWS(COLOR BLACK) 11 ALUMINUM FRAMED BALCONY SCREEN WITH INFILL PANEL IS BO ® BO 0 m B B 0 m m®0 D 12 ASPHALT ROOF SHINGLES(COLOR CHARCOAL) ID BOMB 0 2 6M B D !!I II !ILI ■ nig !I■ ■I■ ; 1i E1 ■ . ■ 1_ •1 • 11__I 10 1 _• I! I! !I I 1 1_ 1_• _I _•I 1 1 pig 11 1 IN 11 1_ I■ !1 ,' ■ 1• !1 1013 !NI • ! !I! WIMP I !I I I! !I I II! I Rm BUILDING W-SOUTHWEST ELEVATION BUILDING W-WEST ELEVATION 2 BUILDING W-SOUTH ELEVATION 3re4•_,.-0• 3/64•=1'-0• 354•=1'-0• OD D m mO 0 ® 000 00 0E1 11:1 0 D D D Om OBDOD 0 00 rl n11:012311110 EO0ME • 1 I ., . . ; , .: nl� !II■ I I! ■ !I IN !I 1111 . 1 Iu II!!I 1!!1 !I!• • 111! .Iu • IEP !!I •U...■ ■■ ■■ 11! !II! !I I ! I I! !I n © I I I! :I I n X11 IIS E1 I,I� EI !1!I I� ..:. �� -- -- --- --- --■■ rim ■■■ ■■■ ■■ IN !1! ISI 1 1g ! !I I !I • BUILDING W-EAST ELEVATION 2 BUILDING W-NORTH ELEVATION 2 ygq•=1'-0' 3/6e=IA' 0 EISINGER FLATS ORONO,MN Collage I architects MARCH.20.2019 2 3 6 1 8 1110 4 6 5 8 5 12 10 7 © moom © 11 ©© MATERIAL INDEX .. 1 ROCK FACE BLOCK(COLOR:TBD) caul y s :� I. •'COC] C-10�I��IIly�l I! 2 MODULAR FACE BRICK(COLORTBD) I■ !'I I 3 CAST STONE SILL(COLOR TBD) LJ '1 !! 4 FIBER CEMENT PANEL(PREFINISHED COLOR TERRACOTTA- SMOOTH) !II !I Ell ■ • 11• •1 1 __"'�" ■I 1■ ii 18 I■ ■I ■I 1 I 5 FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING 6"(PREFINISHED COLOR'.LIGHT ili III GREY-SMOOTH) 6 FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING 6",3"(PREFINISHED COLOR •I 1• •I • • 01 II 1 loraEY-SMOOTH) n'y,l 1• •1 I I.1 I I• 11 1 1• 1 7 FIBER CEM NCHARCOAL T WINDOW TRIM(PREFINISHED COLOR WHITE) _ --_ _ - o- __-- E_ _-___-__-_ -__-_ -e--__ � -r- r--r- ---- r-- _--_rr_ - _ r „_ ,r --r,_n 8 PCIENTISBHAL UNMPIN.UM BALCONY W/MTL GUARDRAIL RD R AIL _ r___ _- _ i _ - _ _ -_ _°_ _-__L_�____ ... .,...,.,.,„.-____- r= —( 9 ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM(COLORBLACK) BUILDING E-NORTH ELEVATION BUILDING E-SOUTH ELEVATION 10 VINYL WINDOWS(COLOR BLACK) 11 ALUMINUM FRAMED MED BALCONY SCREEN WITH INFILL PANEL 12 ASPHALT ROOF SHINGLES(COLOR CHARCOAL) m © © III 13 El © 0 0 m©• © 11 mo © B 13111:1013 Em0 11 El COM BMOC LI !II! M ■ •'Way 0!D 00 ;.x.,E ■ ■ rlI!I MI NEM DIJ! n n CounoC] . "Lim ! !IT! !1! ■ ■ I, I• !!! III !!I •I I ■ ■ !I! !!!!! !1! n n I I! !■ ■I I n n. I III !rr!,w,, I I• •I • !I! !1! • ■ •I I !!! •I 1 III III! ■ • !1! !!!! !1! • n !I I !! II! n n, •I I !! I• !I BUILDING E-WEST ELEVATION El © 0 © mo 13 m0 om 11 © 0 ® N 113 am IIS 0m 0011 I© m Dm © On 000 ■ ■ ■ ■ ! ! ! 1 :!I• • p� !I loll •I !!°r*IL].LINT ■ ■ r� e !�! e II! I II!! , kin MINEI_ _I L�.I �i 1 C]C7C] C 1 I' C][]C] MUM Mid 1! !I • • !I! !I! 1 !ll I ■ ■ !!1! !!!! !I! • ■ I I! ! ! !1 I ■ ■ !II! • !I! • !I! 011 !I I I• !1 • • !I! !I! ' 1 I• ■ ■ !1! ■P!! !1! • • •I I ! ! IIII! • ■ !I! • !I! • !I! I I! •I I figaRISISHRVNIIMMIJll u ” 1 ll 1 ' ku BUILDING E-EAST ELEVATION 3/64'=1'-0' IFIlEISINGER FLATS ORONO,MN Collage I architects MARCH.20.2019 - - -.- -.' -3.--J.--.:, -.,-,,P,4P''''''''. t:::iii1 "-4-2.;..'-',,,-,:-,-.- ;',':,..';::'-',-,,,-:.-';'..--?::,;4::341,1v4i.7:,- 1-'-if''-,ii,-.';?...-ii :-Zat:41:-1,.',,,',.ii:.-:,,''-ii!,;:: ::',.'-::.-i,---',. .;:-.-f.,',..,'''':-:,,rg.,..1-' „, r,,, , 4:..-:,...,.'..,.,,i,41,.:-:"...::::t:I':,,,:.:-:;-*4'-,.;::::::-:'-'''''''''-w.;'?::::..,;:::!1,'--,1;:';1 !1*::11:i?''''''''' ' , . .. .... . , .. . .. ... . .,, , ..,.... . ., „?';,!ii.‘,4,:,,',,„,-.,P;-.,-„,,,:%:':-',:'!-::,,,..-,-. ,it'-,..... E:-.,.;:tv,.-i...-„, , , , . .. . , .-.. : if ,i :-- -- -. --- -- - ii . r arl IPP” 1 ii! 1 ..... -_-....--..- ... . – - ' ' Al I N 11111 i_Ttinli 11'r- , :WI' '11. j . 1 p Iii p.1 III- ____ ...__ . ,.. ,,Li_iii, , a a ,cr ..,,,,,,111 7 ...L. - 1 ill I— II! .. _ . I a ,_, 1-2t7:11-7- ;tiP,i# if ,,I 0.1.1 11-' "Ill 1111,,:11, ---, .__-- , 1 ' - '. ii Ulf 1111 .1 - . Ili ala i it _ .irt-L.- 1 -- -,.......,..,, — ,,,,_ ___ .-..airw, , • , . , . . L,. -------------.1,„..,,_ ..-- -- ...,...... . NE VIEW-COLOR OPTION 1 30 PM E I S I mNA0GRRcoEHN.02R6.m2 FLATSoNi 9 1151 1 a rchitects Collage „,, ,N.,,,, .:-.,:i.::;,..",...::,_.,,,,fiim.:..ii.:,,..',.:„.,Iiii,,,,,,,:4-;,,,,,Li:_1,,,,,,...;:i.t:'-`ii,i';F,..i.,'I'ii:::;1},-,,si-,t,,•...,..;;;,T,e,.....,..,.',:::;,...:;':A`,, ” of, : ,,,,,?E't!,I'll'.,_,,i"41,1.-;14;,1',:','„.:3: f �^ ten: „ Try s , ii r 1 - ka �, �Q. SW VIEW-COLOR OPTION 1 EISINGER FLATS Clill ORONO,MN Collage I architects MARCH.20.2019 WENCK ASSOCIATES Responsive partner. Exceptional outcomes. Toll Free:800-472-2232 Email:wenckmp@wenck.com Web:wenck.com MINNESOTA COLORADO GEORGIA NORTH DAKOTA SOUTH DAKOTA WYOMING Maple Plain Golden Valley New Hope Denver Roswell Fargo Pierre Cheyenne 763-479-4200 763-252-6800 800-368-8831 602-370-7420 678-987-5840 701-297-9600 605-222-1826 307-634-7848 Windom Woodbury Fort Collins Mandan Sheridan 507-831-2703 651-294-4580 970-223-4705 701-751-3370 307-675-1148 BO LTO N 2638 Shadow Lane & M E N K Suite 272 Chaska, MN 55318-1172 Real People.Real Solutions. Ph: (952)448-8838 Fax: (952)448-8805 Bolton-Menk.com April 9,2019 City of Orono Attn: Jeremy Barnhart 2750 Kelley Parkway Orono,MN 55356 RE: Preliminary Plat Application LA19-25 Eisinger Flats Engineering Review#1 Dear Jeremy: As requested, I have completed an engineering review of the documents submitted for the above referenced project. We offer the following observations, comments, and recommendations for your consideration: 1. The applicant is proposing to utilize an underground storage system in addition to the system approved as part of the Preliminary Plat process for the adjacent Eisinger Meadows development to meet regulatory requirements for Stormwater Management. The following should be considered regarding stormwater management: a. The hydraulic calculations submitted are insufficient to determine adequate sizing of facilities and if stormwater runoff treatment provided meets requirements. A complete Stormwater Management Plan should be submitted that includes the entire Eisinger development. The Stormwater Management Plan should include a narrative summary outlining site conditions, routing, requirements, and design to meet requirements. In addition, supporting calculations, Drainage Area Maps, and an Impervious Surface Exhibit should be included to provide a complete plan. b. The stormwater management system must limit proposed peak runoff rates to that of existing for the 1, 10,and 100 year—24h hour events. The system must limit proposed discharges of runoff volume, Total Suspended Solids, and Phosphorus to that of existing conditions as well. Since more than one acre of new impervious surface is proposed, the system must include volume reduction equal to 1"of runoff from the new impervious surface per NPDES requirements. The stormwater management plan should be revised as necessary to meet all requirements and resubmitted for review prior to Preliminary Plat approval to ensure adequate siting is available for required facilities. c. Per NPDES requirements and the historic landfill on site, a contamination screening assessment should be provided for any areas of proposed infiltration. 2. Storm sewer calculations must be submitted to verify adequate sizing of drainage system. 3. The applicant will be required to obtain Minnehaha Creek Watershed District(MCWD) approval and permitting. A copy of any approvals or permits required should be submitted prior to Final Plat approval. 4. The applicant will be required to obtain a General Construction Permit(NPDES)to discharge stormwater associated with construction activity since more than 1 acre will be disturbed. A copy of the permit should be submitted prior to any land disturbing activity. H:\ORN O\C13117856\z_LA19-25 Eisinger Flats\EisingerFlats_PrePlatReview_2019-04-09.docx Bolton&Menk is an equal opportunity employer. Preliminary Plat Application LA19-25 Eisinger Flats Page 2 5. The applicant will be required to submit a Maintenance Agreement for all stormwater management structures and facilities. The agreement should define maintenance responsibilities following completion of project, specify types and frequencies of inspection and maintenance activities, designate who will conduct inspection and maintenance activities, and outline reporting requirements. The agreement should list MC WD and the City of Orono as parties to the agreement. 6. Record drawings must be submitted upon completion of the project. 7. Drainage and Utility Easements should be provided as follows: a. Over all stormwater management facilities used to meet regulatory requirements. b. Over all wetland and buffers. 8. Additional detail should be provided on the Preliminary Grading Plan in order to verify adequate slopes, drainage ways, and surface overflows. Proposed contours and spot elevations should be added as necessary to adequately define site grading. 9. It appears that retaining walls may be necessary near parking garage entrances. Retaining walls 4' or greater in height must be designed by a licensed Professional Engineer, and plans approved prior to construction. 10. A fence should be provided on walls 4' or greater in height, and details should be included accordingly. 11. In order to limit potential for sewer blockages, a grinder pump should be included in buildings prior to connection to public sanitary sewer. 12. The final location of fire hydrants,valves, and fire connections must be reviewed by the Fire Chief. 13. Due to heavy soils in the area, the applicant should consider installing draintile at low point inlets. If you have any questions or comments,please contact me to discuss. Sincerely, Bolton & Menk, Inc. Robert E. Bean,Jr.,P.E. Water Resources Engineer CC: Adam Edwards, City of Orono H:\ORNO\C13117856\z_LA19-25 Eisinger Flats\EisingerFlats_PrePlatReview 2019-04-09.docx Bolton&Menk is an equal opportunity employer. From: )ason D Gottfried To: Jeremy Barnhart;Adam Edwards Cc: Robert H.Bvers;Michael 0 Olmstead Subject: RE: [External]3245 Wayzata Blvd(Eisinger Flats) Date: Thursday,March 28,2019 11:23:13 AM Attachments: Plat 3501-Orono-Eisinger Meadows.odf Remnant 3025 Diece.odf Hello Jeremy and Adam, We discussed the Eisinger Flats proposal in our plat review committee on March 26th and offer the following comments in addition to our 2016 comment letter(attached): As you are aware this section of CSAH 112 (Phase 3) is currently programmed for reconstruction in 2022. While we have a design concept in place for a 2-lane section with ditch drainage, the details of the design are still being considered. Access • We accept the proposed single access location. As stated previously,this single access will have to serve the entire development due to our spacing guidelines and high speed of the corridor. • As previously stated turn lanes(EB right turn/WB left turn) will be necessary to serve this access to ensure high speed thru traffic and slow,turning vehicles are separated. • County staff previously guided access here following sight distance measurements. Please ensure this sight distance is clear from any trees, etc • The internal hammerhead on the eastern edge of the property should be further setback from the right-of-way line. We want to remove any ambiguity about this location. It would be prudent to ensure there is adequate space for a garbage truck/delivery truck to turn around in this space. If an emergency access is desired here in the future please work with Mike Olmstead in our permits dept on details. • It will be essential to align the single access on the north side of CSAH 112 to this location should that site redevelopment in the future. Based on the high speed and 2-lane section turn lanes will likely be necessary to serve this access as well in the future. Right-of-way Additional right-of-way dedication will be necessary here to at least match the 60'half section on the east side of this property.This is essential to contain the necessary WB left turn, and EB right turn lane needed to support the trips to serve the development on this 55 mph section of 112. Furthermore,there is a question of whether the extension of an off-road trail could be provided on the southside or both sides of CSAH 112 here. Additionally,there is a question of what/if any changes may take place with the corner piece of the 3025 Wayzata Blvd property to the east(see attached). We understand the Apple Farm will likely redevelop, but this remnant piece of the property(isolated by wetlands to the east) still has a curb cut. Perhaps its necessary to provide an access easement to this property so it is not landlocked should it ever be utilized again. Thank you for your coordination and let me know if you would like to discuss any item further Jason Jason Gottfried Transportation Planner Hennepin County Office: 612-596-0394 Email: Jason.Gottfriedhennepin.us Hennepin County Public Works 1600 Prairie Drive Medina, MN 55340-3410 From:Jeremy Barnhart Sent: Friday, March 22, 2019 9:27 AM To:Jason D Gottfried <Jason.Gottfried@hennepin.us>; Robert H. Byers <Robert.Byers@hennepin.us> Subject: [External] 3245 Wayzata Blvd (Eisinger Flats) Jason and Bob, The City has received a preliminary plat application for the above referenced address. Can you share any comments the County has regarding the development. This is scheduled to be reviewed by the Planning Commission on April 15, 2019. Of note, can you comment on the need for a turn lane, and the location of the road intersection. Jeremy Barnhart,AICP Community Development Director City of Orono 952-249-4626 ***CAUTION:This email was sent from outside of Hennepin County. Unless you recognize the sender and know the content, do not click links or open attachments.*** Disclaimer: If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please immediately notify the sender of the transmission error and then promptly delete this message from your computer system. Hennepin County Public Works Hennepin Transportation Department lames N. Grube P.E,, County iighv'ay Engineer 612 596-0300, Phone 1600 Prairie Drive 61)-321-3410, Fax Medina, Minnesota 55340 www.hennepin.usitransportation Mr. Michael P. Gaffron May 6, 2016 Senior Planner City of Orono Re: Preliminary Plat Review-Eisinger Meadows P.O. Box 66 CSAH-112 (Wayzata Blvd.) Orono, MN 55323 Hennepin County Plat Review ID #3501 Dear Mr.Gaffron: Minnesota Statutes 505.02, 505.03,and 462.358, Plats and Surveys,allow up to 30 days for county review of preliminary plats abutting county roads.The preliminary plat for Eisinger Meadows was received by Hennepin County on April 26,2016.This plat proposes to subdivide 2 rural parcels into 27 single-family residential lots with a potential future 2nd phase of development of a multi-family residential building.The Hennepin County Plat Review Committee discussed this proposal on May 3, 2016 and have provided the following comments: Access-This plat proposes 2 access points approximately 675 feet apart from each other with a horseshoe design.This spacing would not meet county access spacing guidelines and the entering sight distances may be somewhat restricted,therefore county staff would prefer a single entrance located in an optimal, safe location. Hennepin County will require a demonstration that the desired sight distances can be obtained,and will require that right and left turn lanes be provided on County Road 112 for the street entrance.An approved concept plan and design will be needed prior to approval of the street entrance permit. We believe that the proposed 2-entrance proposal would have questionable feasibility and cost effectiveness because of the following: • The provision of adequate entering sight distances will be difficult due to the relatively high roadway speed (55 miles per hour),and the horizontal profile of County Road 112 • Right and left turn lanes would need to be provided for both entrances,necessitating longer tapers,and a wider roadway footprint • It will be difficult to avoid significant side slope issues and wetland impacts due to the need for the longer turn lanes Right-of-Way-The County is planning on reconstructing this section of roadway in 2019.The preliminary design envision a 2-lane rural section that could be reconstructed within the existing roadway right-of-way(100-125 feet). However,the provision of turn lanes required for this proposed development will likely require additional right-of-way on both sides of County Road 112. Pedestrian&Bicycle Considerations-The piece-meal phasing of development along this corridor presents considerable challenges to the provision of safe and reasonable bicycle and pedestrian connections to both the adjacent high school,the regional trail located lh mile to the east,and the park across County Road 112 to the west.Some significant obstacles that exist to adding walkways or trails along County Road 112 include potential wetland impacts and the lack of controlled crossings.The county supports an eventual internal walkway trail system within the residential developments on the south side of County Road 112 to provide these connections. Permits-- Please inform the developer that all proposed construction within county right-of-way requires an approved Hennepin County permit prior to beginning construction.This includes,but is not limited to driveway and street access,drainage and utility construction,trail development, and landscaping. Permit questions can be directed to Steve Groen at(612) 596-0337 or stevenaroen@hennepin.us. Please contact Bob Byers(612)596-0354,robertbyers(d hennepin us or Jason Gottfried(612)596-0394, jason.gottfriedcahennepin.us for any further discussion of these items. Sincerely, C----7A4'" ,K James N. Grube, P.E. Director of Transportation and County Engineer JNG/jdg cc: Plat Review Committee Mark Larson, Hennepin County Survey Office 5/4/2016 Hennepin County GIS-Printable Map Hennepin Interactive - Property maps M a p 4 t' { t , $ ^< f ff Y Ytr k 4 d < �. r. i ''',P2•••4 ..;Lt • �' ''''..W - `',;.';'-:'4415.1,''',1" I r s 1Y ti . y i a a 7: r 1Y: b t j'^ .- iy, r P yt' .: k__, ::,,,.:*.,: 1 t , . ., .. _ .. e e' t +� , ."',..;,:-.'-'.. .1::....:;M 3 n`x Cir`..' kl. r 4 �a:r; 4x if.:''' / 1 ; 3Y i � Yom, / -2 *°•. 'a. �_ Y tit i,J ,. .st_r F. ! ,i:1 fi.;?. :„ ./• til n. .. RPI. Parcel 32-118-23-14-0002 A-T-B: Abstract Map Scale:51;;;2041°6° 1 ' 400 ft. N ID. Print Date:5/4/2016 Owner LakewestLlc Market $135,000 Name: Total: Parcel 3245 Wayzata Blvd W Tax $1,310.86 Address: Orono,MN 55356 Total: (Payable:2015) Property Sale Vacant Land-Rural Residential Type: Price: This map is a compilation of data from various sources and is furnished"AS IS"with no Home- Sale warranty stead: Non-Homestead Date: implied,includingor fitness of any particula representation purpose,merchantability,or theexpressed accuracy and completeness of the information shown. Parcel 25.8 acres Sale COPYRIGHT©HENNEPIN COUNTY 2016 Area: 1,123,933 sq ft Code: haps://gis.hennepin.us/Property old/print/default.aspx?C=452169.3808444499,4981784.138033654&L=6&T=hybrid&D=true&LID=O&FID=3211823140002&VIS=O... 1/2 _ �� x . Q I Imo` \'r. ' 'e-��7_ I IT P.3 it/st ...:•:111'llilliiiiiii!i. 1 ' '1' — ' -----4--,"N:,-. .;#,..)Vgli, Lu -,-,- 6 1.z,L . ---7----„ '\Ns\ . 141i:1111iIii ---.. .,) ♦ `'':' U w 5 :a a P 1 a Z N Air ` � f 1 'd# Yil w N � ` o0 Aa, no` 101,diip pi it I #.: [ Rte ' ,, lqiiiiii, Ph. 0 :1 " i 1 I *0 $,ig,i!i!i :411010111 I j 'Illk A114111 . .—„„ <ANWOM ,.ice I' ^ i.s::;!!i `i!"!ri:�i:':'-?i :i 'iiiii;i'!!;iii;`:ii;;: ii F'^ : :':::::k.�r+'. :~::isi: :::i:�i::::__:��:?i::'ji:i:: :iiii ii�:i:i:i.tiii i:eiiii:. Z 0 r 1 N..:........ ... / � \ ••'+.ti:i:i::::::::::!:!t:::ism:::::i:py:.If IC E \ I ...J I..�..�......: L.._ I:111 y il :11% # lIS_ {{ ::: ::.. . 3 : . I i�i; g d ::::i!:u:ti:.�'::is i::;!:i::rs 9' �• '�is j�� �i::!:'i � :... ry: :!�::i • !i':i::::i i'i'i'i i:i': is i;;i:`:':' :!:"i::!i:?!ii"ii!i!i'..:,... V.0 zdA 9 p yyA Y k M lgall Z= 2S .11 Ili 10 ., a AWN Oil �s I Z. M M b li A R A p p riM p b b I a I# 010 ii iiiiiiiiiiiiii iviil S uQ 9 al� o� 1 � g h bi g g N b N a m .. .. . 10 li 0111111013 kb 1 qI.• 11 I I I I I I I I I I IIf I .. . . .� . . ...,.•......... (I .fl_,nw:b4 .ce umw wwa ao-s:WolnL I . Building Height Analysis Worksheet The following is an analysis of the building height based on plans dated April 1,2019 and March 20,2019. If these plans change,in particular with respect to building location,FFE,or building design,the height will need to be reanalyzed. Buildin• Hei.ht Anal sis:West Buildin.: Distance Between First Floor and defined Top of Roof*(See"building height" definition): (a) 30 First Floor Elevation(from building plans): (b) 986.7 Highest Existing ground level(per survey)or 10'above lowest ground level,whichever is lower: (c) 992 Difference between(b)and(c)*: (d) 5.3 DEFINED HEIGHT *If highest existing adjacent grade is above FFE-Height is(a)-(d): (e) *If highest existing adjacent grade is below FFE-Height is(a) + (d) 24.7 Buildin' Hei.ht Anal sis: East Buildin Distance Between First Floor and defined Top of Roof*(See"building height" definition): (a) 30 First Floor Elevation(from building plans): (b) 986.7 Highest Existing ground level(per survey)or 10'above lowest ground level,whichever is lower: (c) 992 Difference between(b)and(c)*: (d) 5.3 DEFINED HEIGHT *If highest existing adjacent grade is above FFE-Height is(a)-(d): (e) *If highest existing adjacent grade is below FFE-Height is(a) + (d) 24.7 © 2019 RYAN ENGNEEFING I I I \ --------/ /: /,/,../• // ,r1 04 ,1 ;:r*: ./////, •/I.!-AW- 7 . / 4. 1 I /�� ,t lila Id Cdr,A ii,,�, A 4.1mrrp", 3', ir/f1.41V( / / i, // iiew . 12 er Arp_nrAyilm A pa Au \„` ir- % /7%i /to,/ ' '• S „�!�.►�ii"droldail 4:1241141ram!dri G/ �011 /,� 1 \ .i� / �� �i1� �� X.,TwAiw...---ar /. 1 1 1 ! L'- lE m 97400 /- 1/.77/77// l 1 �� r+ j/ j jI �//'�� 70'oFs PLf ,O L� 0 ( t 1 l K£7LAND f I / i ( I4. mb... / t `C I 1 � MD W/:126'• �j / 1' \ \I �; 6'PVC.SAN �.�'_ �� Son MH 7 l. l I _t l 11� mz�cF�l l��i ��11�►�D / =s��z5 �I I,/ I 1I 'PVC WAT '..�i� `._��� ..� ..�.it 1 1 ( I`1 \ 1 1 i _ I • ,/ , 1 II ) \ 1 ---,,:_ iiiii 1 1, , i ' 1 1 oi , 1 1 I .1 f \I\i !� l % 1� / PROPOSED 11111 eu WING ! �`• 7 } I 1}I BUILDING i all a I YI 1 UNDERGROUND 26' 1: 1 1 /1 a `J 1 \ 57DRMWA7ER \ = 18 1s \I / 11 \ \ I TREATMENT26' 18 . 26'i _ i PAINT G 1 ' o t i 1 \ 1 SYSTEM '. \`} J- A ,i7, -- I�/ (TYPICAL) / 1 I 1 1 11 1 � I 7 , I 1i 1 A \\‘\' �\ , B/7UMINOUS PANNG $ f� 1 i\ 1`' '� 1 �' 7. _� ( NYD/JW/6'CV \A I '� 1 7 _ �r r1 1 // I I \ ' AD ACCESSIiBLE ROU • '��'1 I I1 I 1 5� \V A �� ' \ V' I . '1 HA/1:20 SLOP , I J 'N \' 1 EXr7-T R4 MPS c 7714 ` • \ ENTRY \ v '} \ \�� ENTRY \. N. \I ,�.'�igdk till'7 .Et me ; I it 1 \ �I V ��G �,/ i i ;, I \ 'III i N\�N. ' ti \ \ v AN N _, .......„ N„ , \"NC c� ~ \ J �\\ \�/n_ —� �_..._.__..._- �N� �`��� \ 1_..7._, I \ \ PROPOSED\ ,. V N 7 RETAINING WALL- --. ' 1 \ • GENERAL UTILITY NOTES 77-1E CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR 70 CONSTRUCTION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RECEIVE 7HE NECESSARY PERMITS FOR ALL AND NOTIFY 7HE OWNER OF ANY D/H'tKENCES OF THE PROPERTY LIMITS ALL WORK SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE W77N 7H£CITY SEE ARCH.PLAN FOR EXACT BLDG.LOCATION! SEE SI7E PLAN FOR LA STANDARD SPEC/RCATION5 PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS OR AS MODIFIED HEREIN. SERNCE ENTRY LOCA77ONS 70 BE COORDINATED WITH THE ARCHITECT. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, OR AS SPECIFIED IN THE ABOVE NOTE ALL VERIFY EXISTING INVERT LOG h ELEV. PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSIRUL MATERIALS CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES AND TESTING SHALL CONFORM TO THE LATEST ED. OF THE STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER 771E WATER SERNCE SHALL BE INSTALLED 147771 A MIN. OF Z5 FT. OF GOPHER STATE ONE CALL MAIN AND SERNCE UNE INSTALLATION AND SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION BY THE CITY ENGINEERING ASSOCIATION OF MINN.'AND TO THE ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 5 UNLESS OTHERWISE NO7E7 `"`"'OORBUT^TEC" "STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION'MINN.DEPT. OF TRANS., ��4.sra�. LATEST EDITION, INCLUDING 7HE CURRENT ADDENDUM. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL'FOR FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO UTILITY INSTALLATION. � �V Hennepin Hennepin County Locate & Notify Map Date: 3/21/2019 J �'� ' t ' , Yi }tom stt 1 , 3s'+ fe; ac ' P! T x ,......„...,,,,,, . „...... . . ,. f „.„. .. . . , ... is.. ii , xVi �y:ata Blvd 7 „„„„,.., 444(1k L 16,1hl'T Y § r N , , ' ., -,,,,,- vs,,,l, ., ."P, "1, ,-;',., A i N :'140 "* ”' -"f S�`�t= saw NI 1Z t tN' ightlfrayve 111 Buffer Size: 500 0 100200 400 Feet Map Comments: I :10:121 i i I i I i I 3245 Wayzata Blvd West This data (i) a furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness o r accuracy, (i)is fu m fished with no warranty of any knd; and (ii) is no ounty s for legal,engineering or suney,ju • purposes.Hennepin County shat not be liablefor anydamage,injury or loss resulting from this data. For more information,contact Hennepin CountyGIS Office 3006th Street South,Minn eapols,MN55487/gis.infor hennepin.us RUN DATE:03/21/2019 HENNEPIN COUNTY PROPERTY INFORMATION SYSTEM(PROPERTY OWNERS LIST) PAGE:1 38 32-118-23 11 0001 38 33-118-23 22 0001 BARBARA LUPIENT TRUSTEE BARBARA LUPIENT TRUSTEE 3220 WAYZATA BLVD W 3200 WAYZATA BLVD W ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 BARBARA LUPIENT BARBARA LUPIENT C/O LUPIENT AUTOMOTIVE GRP C/O LUPIENT AUTOMOTIVE GRP 7100 WAYZATA BLVD#200 7100 WAYZATA BLVD#200 GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55426 GOLDEN VALLEY MN 55426 38 32-118-23 12 0001 38 33-118-23 23 0002 CITY OF ORONO R E DUMAS&K G DUMAS 3580 WAYZATA BLVD W 3025 WAYZATA BLVD W ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 CITY OF ORONO ROBERT E&KATHRYN G DUMAS P 0 BOX 66 3025 WAYZATA BLVD CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 BOX 607 LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 32-118-23 13 0001 38 33-118-23 31 0010 STATE OF MN GN RY CO 3507 WAYZATA BLVD W 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 00000 MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION B N&SANTA FE RR CO DIRECTOR OF R/W OPERATIONS PROPERTY TAX DEPT 395 JOHN IRELAND BLVD PO BOX 961089 STPAUL MN 55155 FORT WORTH TX 76161 38 32-118-23 13 0002 38 33-118-23 32 0002 R C TAYLOR&S SKAY-TAYLOR BURLINGTON NORTHERN INC 530 STUBBS BAY RD N 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 00000 R C TAYLOR&S SKAY-TAYLOR B N&SANTA FE RR CO 530 STUBBS BAY RD N PROPERTY TAX DEPT LONG LAKE MN 55356 PO BOX 961089 FORT WORTH TX 76161 38 32-118-23 13 0003 38 33-118-23 32 0005 ANNE MAHDAL BARAN TRUST CITY OF ORONO 480 STUBBS BAY RD N 375 OLD CRYSTAL BAY RD N ORONO MN 55356 ORONO MN 55356 ANNE MAHDAL BARAN CITY OF ORONO 480 STUBBS BAY RD P O BOX 66 LONG LAKE MN 55356 CRYSTAL BAY MN 55323 38 32-118-23 13 0006 LEE OLMSCHEID 440 STUBBS BAY RD N ORONO MN 55356 LEE OLMSCHEID 440 STUBBS BAY RD N LONG LAKE MN 55356 38 32-118-23 14 0001 LAKEWEST LLC 3245 WAYZATA BLVD W ORONO MN 55356 LAKEWEST LLC 14525 HIGHWAY 7#265 MINNEONKA MN 55345 38 32-118-23 14 0002 LAKEWEST LLC 3245 WAYZATA BLVD W ORONO MN 55356 LAKEWEST LLC 14525 HIGHWAY 7#265 MINNEONKA MN 55345 38 32-118-23 210006 BURLINGTON NORTHERN RY 38 ADDRESS UNASSIGNED ORONO MN 00000 B N&SANTA FE RR CO PROPERTY TAX DEPT PO BOX 961089 FORT WORTH TX 76161 38 32-118-23 41 0002 TAJ MELSON&B PACE GRACZYK 3330 WATERTOWN RD ORONO MN 55356 TAJ MELSON BILLIE PACE GRACZYK 3330 WATERTOWN RD LONG LAKE MN 55356 Hennepin County has developed electronic forms of certain property information databases.Hennepin County makes reasonable efforts to produce and publish the most current property information available.The viewer should understand,however,that Hennepin County makes no representation or warranties,either express or implied,or as to merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose regarding the accuracy and/or completeness of the information contained herein. Subdivision I. - Land Alterationsu Footnotes: ---(28) --- Cross reference—Grading and land alterations, § 78-1590 et seq. Sec. 78-1725.-Purpose and intent. The purpose of this section is to promote the health, safety, and welfare of the community and to establish reasonable uniform limitations, standards, and controls for land alterations, excavating, filling and grading within the city. The regulations will allow the city to better manage stormwater discharge, ensuring drainage does not negatively impact neighboring properties, manage hauling traffic and noise, and prevent erosion issues onto adjacent properties, wetlands, lakes, and roads. (Ord.No. 219 3rd series, § 6, 12-10-2018) Sec. 78-1726. - Interim use permit required. An application for an interim use permit shall be accompanied by a certified site plan showing the location of the proposed excavation or storage and shall state the amount of material which is to be removed, excavated or stored, placed, or graded, and such other information as the council may require. Applications shall be filed with the city administrator and shall be accompanied by a deposit to be determined by the city, which will be used to offset the cost of processing the application. Any unused portion will be refunded to the applicant. (a) Except where otherwise provided in the article, it is unlawful for any person to perform or have performed the following land alteration activities without an interim use permit issued by the council: (1) Mining. The commercial extraction of sand, gravel or other material from the land and their removal from the site without processing shall be mining. In all districts, the conduct of mining shall be permitted only upon issuance of a interim use permit. Such permit shall include, as a condition, a plan for a finished grade which will not adversely affect the surrounding land or development of the site on which the mining is being conducted, and the route of trucks moving to and from the sites. A bond will be required for restoration (2) Soil processing. The operation of processing of sand, gravel or other material mined from the land shall be permitted only by interim use permit. Such permit shall include a site plan where the processing is to be done, showing the location of the plant, disposal of water, route of trucks moving to and from the site in removing processed material from the site, the condition in which the site is intended to be left upon completion, hour of operation; and such permit shall not be granted for a period of longer than 12 months (3) Creation of an engineered grade for the basis of building height determination outside of a subdivision. (4) Change the grade or shore of lakeshore property within the shore setback, in excess of 50 cubic yards. (5) Stockpiling on site in excess of 500 cubic yards, without an associated building permit. (6) Any import/export of material in excess of 500 cumulative cubic yards, also see City Code section 78-1286(d)(3). (7) Conducting grading or land alterations which result in changes in elevations within five feet of adjacent properties outside of an active building permit. (Ord. No. 219 3rd series, § 6, 12-10-2018) Secs. 78-1727-78-1744. -Reserved. DIVISION 11. - RPUD RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTu Footnotes: --- (7) --- Cross reference—Planned unit development, § 78-1001 et seq. Sec. 78-621. - Purpose. The purpose of the residential planned unit development (RPUD) district is to provide a district which will allow for the implementation of certain residential housing goals established in the 2000-2020 Orono Community Management Plan ("CMP" or "comprehensive plan"). The RPUD district is established to accommodate the densities and types of residential development contemplated in the CMP by incorporating the principles of the planned unit development concept. The RPUD district will encourage the following: (1) Flexibility in land development and redevelopment in order to utilize new techniques of building design, construction and land development; (2) Provision of housing to meet lifecycle, and affordable and moderate cost housing needs; (3) Energy conservation through the use of more efficient building designs and sitings and the clustering of buildings and land uses; (4) Preservation of desirable site characteristics and open space and protection of sensitive environmental features, including steep slopes, poor soils and trees; (5) High quality of design and design compatible with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned; (6) Sensitive development in transitional areas located between different land uses and along significant corridors within the city; and (7) Development which is consistent with the comprehensive plan. (Ord.No. 202 2nd series, § 1(1), 2-26-2001) Sec. 78-622. - Exceptions. This section shall not apply to any residential PUD or PRD which has received preliminary or final approval by the city council prior to the effective date of the ordinance from which this division is derived, unless such application is requested by the property owner and approved by the city council. (Ord.No. 202 2nd series, § 1(9), 2-26-2001) Sec. 78-623. -Permitted uses. Within the RPUD district, no structure or land shall be used except for one or more of the following uses: (1) One-family detached dwellings. (2) Publicly owned parks and playgrounds. (3) Municipal buildings. (4) Multifamily attached dwellings only when consistent within the areas of the city designated as urban area in the comprehensive plan. (Code 1984, § 10.20(2); Ord.No. 202 2nd series § 1(2), 2-26-2001) State Law reference— State mandated permitted uses, Minn. Stat. § 462.357, subd. 7. Sec. 78-624. -Conditional uses. Within the RPUD district, no land or structure shall be used for the following uses except by conditional use permit: (1) Public service structures. Public service structures, including but not limited to electric transmission lines, buildings, such as telephone exchange stations, booster or pressure regulating stations, wells, and plumbing stations, elevated tanks, lift stations and electrical power substations, provided no building shall be located within 50 feet from any lot line of an abutting lot in an R district. Prior to granting such permit it shall be found that the architectural design of service structures is compatible to the neighborhood in which it is to be located and thus will promote the general welfare. Public service structures that have been approved by the city at required public hearings for public improvement projects shall not require a conditional use permit, but such structures shall be subject to all other appropriate standards set forth in this section; amendments to approved plans involving design and/or placement of these structures will require written notice by the city to all affected property owners 14 days prior to the adoption of the amended plans by the council. Personal wireless services and commercial broadcasting antennas and towers shall not be considered public service structures. Uses allowed by conditional use permit shall be reviewed for compliance with the PUD master development plan and with the applicable conditional use permit standards of this division. Uses allowed by conditional use permit shall also be subject to site and building plan review pursuant to this division. (2) Assisted living facilities. Assisted living facilities as defined in this chapter, subject to the general conditions and multifamily-specific conditions applicable to uses in the RPUD district. (Ord.No. 202 2nd series, § 1(3), 2-26-2001; Ord. No. 75 3rd series, § 1, 7-12-2010) Sec. 78-625. -Accessory uses. Within any RPUD district, the only permitted accessory uses and structures are the following: (1) Private garages and parking space. (2) Private swimming pools, tennis courts, and paddocks. (3) Home occupations, as defined in this chapter. All home occupations shall comply with the provisions of section 78-1376, and the licensing provisions of section 26-76, when applicable. (4) Signs, as regulated in this chapter. (5) Buildings temporarily located for purposes of constructing on the premises for a period not to exceed time necessary for such constructing. (6) Gardening and other horticultural uses, including aviaries and decorative landscape features. (7) Communication reception/transmission devices as follows: a. Accessory antennas, which shall be limited to radio and television receiving antennas, satellite dishes, TVROs, and amateur shortwave radio transmitting and receiving antennas. Accessory antennas that are accessory to the principal use of property are permitted accessory uses in all zoning districts, provided they meet the following conditions: 1. Height. A ground-mounted accessory antenna shall not exceed 20 feet in height from ground level. 2. Yards. Accessory antennas shall not be located within the required front yard setback, corner side yard setback or side yard setback abutting a street. 3. Roofs. If vegetation or obstructions interfere with satellite signals at a location in any allowable placement area, the accessory antenna may be placed on the roof of any authorized structure on the premises. 4. Location. Accessory antennas shall not be located within a required yard or setback area or within drainage or utility easements. Antenna towers shall be set back from adjacent property lines a horizontal distance no less than the maximum height of the antenna. 5. Building permits. A building permit shall be required for the installation of any accessory antenna requiring a conditional use permit. Building permit applications shall be accompanied by a site plan and structural component data for the accessory antenna, including details of anchoring. The building official must approve the plans before installation. 6. Lightning protection. Each accessory antenna shall be grounded to protect against natural lightning strikes in conformance with the National Electrical Code as adopted by the city. 7. Electrical code. Accessory antenna electrical equipment and connections shall be designed and installed in conformance with the National Electrical Code as adopted by the city. 8. Color/content. Accessory antennas shall be of a neutral color and shall not be used as signage. b. Amateur shortwave radio antennas and towers which do not meet the conditions for accessory antennas may be allowed with a conditional use permit in all zoning districts, provided they meet the following conditions: 1. Height. When an amateur shortwave radio antenna is mounted on an antenna tower, the total height of the antenna and tower shall not exceed 65 feet. 2. Yards. Amateur shortwave radio antennas and towers shall not be located within a front corner side or side yard. 3. Setbacks. Amateur shortwave radio antennas and towers shall not be located within any required setback area and shall be located no less than the height of the antenna and town from the property line. (8) Privately owned buildings to be used for recreational or social purposes, or for use as storage areas for maintenance equipment or rubbish. (9) Other uses that are customarily incidental to, and subordinate to, the allowed permitted and conditional uses in this district. (Code 1984, § 10.20(4); Ord. No. 161 2nd series, § 6, 6-7-1997; Ord.No. 202 2nd series, § l (4), 2-26-2001; Ord.No. 221 2nd series, § 3, 9-23-2002; Ord. No. 106 3rd series, § 12, 6-10-2013) Sec. 78-626. - Development standards. Within the RPUD district all development shall be in compliance with the following: (1) Minimum area; shoreland district limitation. Each site proposed for rezoning to RPUD shall have a minimum area of five acres, excluding areas within a designated wetland, floodplain or shoreland district or right-of-way, unless the council finds the existence of one of the following: a. Unusual physical features of the property itself or of the surrounding neighborhood such that development as a RPUD will conserve a physical or topographic feature of importance to the neighborhood or community. b. The property is directly adjacent to or across a public street from property which has been developed previously as a RPUD or planned residential development and will be perceived as and will function as an extension of that previously approved development. c. The property is located in an area where the proposed development provides a transition between a commercial or industrial area and an existing residential area or on an intermediate or principal arterial as defined in the comprehensive plan. d. The property contains steep slopes or a substantial number of significant trees that could be preserved through the clustering of buildings or other design techniques not generally allowed by the existing zoning district. No property located within 250 feet of the ordinary high water level (OHWL) of a protected lake or tributary as defined in article IX of this chapter shall be rezoned to RPUD. However, for a property that is partially located less than 250 feet from the OHWL and partially located more than 250 feet from the OHWL, the portion located more than 250 feet from the OHWL may be rezoned to RPUD at the discretion of the city council when all other requirements are met. (2) Uses. Each property rezoned to RPUD shall only be used for the use or uses for which the site is designated in the comprehensive plan, except that the city may permit rezoning to RPUD on a site designated for commercial use if the city council finds that such use is in the best interests of the city and is consistent with the requirements of this division. If a commercial site is to be rezoned to RPUD, the city may forward a copy of the request to the metropolitan council for review. (3) Sewer availability. A site proposed to be rezoned to RPUD with proposed density greater than one unit per two acres must be in the metropolitan urban services area (MUSA) and must be serviced by municipal sewer. (4) Density. Each development in the RPUD district shall have a density within the range specified in the comprehensive plan for the specific site. If the site is not designated in the comprehensive plan for residential use, the appropriate density shall be determined by the city based upon the city council's finding that such density is consistent with the intent of this division and of the comprehensive plan. Developments with proposed densities in excess of the densities contemplated in the comprehensive plan shall be allowed only on properties which are currently zoned and guided for commercial use, in order to maintain the character and integrity of the areas zoned and guided for residential use. (5) Incentives. The city may utilize incentives to encourage the construction of projects which are consistent with the city's housing goals. Incentives may include modification of density (only for properties currently zoned and guided for commercial use) and floor area ratio requirements for developments providing lifecycle housing and affordable and moderate cost housing. Incentives for affordable and moderate cost housing may be approved by the city only after the developer and city have entered into an agreement to ensure that the low and moderate cost units remain available to persons of low and moderate income for at least 20 years. (6) Floor area ratio . Floor area ratios (FARs) shall be limited per the following table: Maximum Floor Area Comprehensive Plan Designation Ratio* , Low or medium density residential (up to 50 and including 6.0 units per 0.5 acre) High density residential (in excess of 6.0 units per acre) 1.0 *FAR = Total Building Floor Area/Total Lot Area Individual lots within a development in the RPUD district may exceed these standards as long as the average meets these standards. (7) Development standards for attached and multifamily dwelling structures. Each site rezoned to RPUD and developed for attached or multiple-family dwelling uses shall be subject to the following standards: a. Setbacks and separation of uses. Within the RPUD district the setback for all attached and multifamily dwelling buildings and their accessory buildings from any bordering or abutting street line shall be 35 feet for local streets and 50 feet from railroad lines or collector or arterial streets, as designated in the comprehensive plan, except that in no case shall the setback be less than the height of the building. The setback for all buildings from exterior RPUD site lot lines not abutting a public street shall be 35 feet, except that in no case shall the setback be less than the height of the building. Building setbacks from internal public streets shall be determined by the city based on characteristics of the specific RPUD site. Parking lots and driving lanes shall be set back at least 20 feet from all exterior lot lines of a RPUD site. The setback for parking structures, including decks and ramps, shall be 35 feet from local streets and 50 feet from all other street classifications, except that in no case shall the setback be less than the height of the structure. Parking structure setbacks from external lot lines shall be 50 feet or the height of the structure, whichever is greater, when adjacent to residential properties; 35 feet, when adjacent to nonresidential properties. Parking structure setbacks from internal public or private streets shall be determined by the city based on characteristics of the specific RPUD site. Where industrial uses abut developed or platted single-family lots outside the RPUD site, greater exterior building and parking setbacks may be required in order to provide effective screening. The city council shall make a determination regarding the adequacy of screening proposed by the applicant. Screening may include the use of natural topography or earth berming, existing and proposed plantings and other features, such as roadways and wetlands, which provide separation of uses. Property rezoned to RPUD shall be considered a residential district for purposes of determining building and parking setback requirements on adjacent high density residential, commercial and industrial property outside the RPUD. b. Height limitations. For properties guided for residential use in the comprehensive plan, a building height limit of 30 feet shall apply. For properties currently zoned or guided in the comprehensive plan for commercial use, height may exceed 30 feet but shall not exceed three stories (not including underground parking level) and shall maintain a residential character by incorporating pitched or hipped roof structure. No mansard or flat roofed multiple-family building will be allowed. c. Outside storage limitations. Building materials, recreational vehicles, boats, RV's, snowmobiles, and other items of personal property shall not be stored outside within any site used for attached or multifamily uses. (8) Development standards for single-family detached dwellings in the RPUD district. Each RPUD site developed for single-family detached dwellings at medium density (i.e., densities ranging from one unit per acre to six units per acre) shall be subject to the following standards: a. Permitted locations: in areas of the city where smaller single-family detached dwelling lots will allow for clustering to preserve significant natural features, or in areas where a mixture of higher density attached dwellings and lower density detached single-family dwellings will result in a development that does not exceed the overall guided density. b. Minimum SFR lot size: 15,000 square feet. c. Minimum lot width at the setback line: 90 feet. d. Minimum lot depth: 125 feet. e. Minimum front yard setback: 25 feet on internal streets within the RPUD site. On exterior or through streets a setback of 35 feet must be provided on local streets and a 50-foot setback on collector or arterial streets, as defined in the comprehensive plan. f. Minimum side yard setback: ten feet along interior lot lines; 15 feet on lot lines along the exterior of the RPUD site. Side yards abutting streets must meet the minimum front yard setbacks as noted in subsection (8)e of this section. Structures in side yards abutting another residential zoning district shall meet the side yard setback requirement of the adjacent zoning district. g. Rear yard setback: minimum of 40 feet or 20 percent of the depth of the lot, whichever is less. h. Building height: maximum of 30 feet. i. All dwelling units, including manufactured homes, shall have a depth of at least 20 feet for at least 50 percent of their width. All dwelling units, including manufactured homes, shall have a width of at least 20 feet for at least 50 percent of their depth. j. All dwellings shall have a permanent foundation in conformance with the state building code. k. Accessory structures shall conform to the setbacks established for principal structures, except as follows: 1. All accessory structures located more than ten feet from a principal structure may be located a minimum of ten feet from a rear or side lot line when that line does not abut a street right-of-way. 2. No accessory structure shall be located closer to the front lot line than the principal structure, regardless of the principal structure setback. I. No accessory structure shall occupy more than 30 percent of the side or rear yard in which it is located, nor exceed 1,000 square feet in area, nor exceed 12 feet in height. m. Off-street parking shall be provided for at least two vehicles for each single-family dwelling. A suitable location for a garage measuring at least 20 feet by 24 feet without a variance shall be provided and indicated as such on a site plan or certified site plan to be submitted when applying for a building permit to construct a new dwelling or alter an existing garage. (9) More than one building allowed. More than one building may be placed on one platted or recorded lot in a RPUD site. (10) Single housing type permitted. Any RPUD development which involves a single housing type shall be permitted, provided that it is otherwise consistent with the objectives of this division and the comprehensive plan. (11) Private recreational area. Each RPUD development shall provide a minimum of ten percent of the gross project area in private recreational uses for project residents. Such area shall be for active or passive recreational uses suited to the needs of the residents of the project, including swimming pools, trails, nature areas, picnic areas, tot lots and saunas. Private recreational area requirements are in addition to the standard park dedication requirements. (12) Ownership. All property to be included within a RPUD development shall be under unified ownership or control, or subject to such legal restrictions or covenants as may be necessary to ensure compliance with the approved master development plan and final site and building plan. (13) Signage. Signs shall be restricted to those which are permitted in a sign plan approved by the city and shall be regulated by permanent covenants. (14) Landscaping, screening and buffering. a. Landscape plan requirements. Landscape plans shall be prepared by a landscape architect or other qualified person acceptable to the city, drawn to the scale of not less than one inch equals 50 feet and shall show the following: 1. Boundary lines of the property with accurate dimensions; 2. Locations of existing and proposed buildings, parking lots, roads, trails and other improvements; 3. Proposed grading plan with two-foot contour intervals; 4. Location, approximate size and common name of existing trees and shrubs; 5. A planting schedule containing symbols, quantities, common and botanical names, size of plant materials, root condition and special planting instructions; 6. Planting details illustrating proposed locations of all new plant material; 7. Locations and details of other landscape features, including berms, fences and planter boxes; 8. Details of restoration of disturbed areas, including areas to be sodded and seeded; 9. Location and details of irrigation systems; and 10. Details and cross sections of all required screening. b. Minimum landscaping requirements. 1. All open areas of a lot which are not used or improved for required parking areas, drives, trails or storage shall be landscaped with a combination of deciduous and coniferous species, including overstory trees, understory trees, shrubs, flowers and groundcover materials. The plan for landscaping shall include ground cover, bushes, shrubbery, trees, sculpture, foundations, decorative walks or other similar site design features or materials in a quantity having a minimum value in conformance with the following table: Minimum Tree and Shrub Requirements Vegetation Type Size Quantity Overstory 2.5-inch bb One tree per 1,000 gross square feet of building footprint area or one deciduous trees (Caliper) tree per 40 lineal feet of site perimeter,whichever is greater. 6-foot height Coniferous treesbb Minimum of 30 percent of required overstory trees must be coniferous Understory 3-gal. potted One shrub per 300 gross square feet of building footprint area or one shrubs or 18-inch shrub per 30 lineal feet of site perimeter,whichever is greater. Not required; but two ornamental deciduous trees may be substituted Ornamental 1.5-inch bb for one required overstory deciduous tree (maximum substitution deciduous trees (Caliper) equals 25 percent of required overstory deciduous trees) 1 Credits for existing trees:The city council shall have sole discretion whether credit shall be granted for existing healthy trees In instances where healthy plant materials of acceptable species exist on a site prior to its development, the application of the standards in subsection (14)b of this section may be adjusted by the city to allow credit for such material, provided that such adjustment is consistent with the intent of this division. 2. A reasonable attempt shall be made to preserve as many existing trees as is practicable and to incorporate them into the site plan. 3. All new overstory trees shall be balled and burlapped or moved from the growing site by tree spade. Deciduous trees shall have a minimum caliper of 2% inches. Coniferous trees shall be a minimum of six feet in height. Ornamental trees shall have a minimum caliper of 11/2 inches. 4. All site areas not covered by buildings, sidewalks, parking lots, driveways, trails, patios, or similar hardcover shall be covered with sod or an equivalent ground cover approved by the city. This requirement shall not apply to site areas retained in a natural state. 5. In order to provide for adequate maintenance of landscaped areas, an underground sprinkler system shall be provided as part of each new development, except one- and two-family dwellings and additions to existing structures which do not at least equal the floor area of the existing structure. A sprinkler system shall be provided for all landscaped areas, except areas to be preserved in a natural state. 6. Not more than 50 percent of the required number of trees shall be composed of one species. The city shall maintain a list of prohibited species, which shall not be used for landscaping. c. Interior parking lot landscaping. 1. All parking lots containing over 100 stalls shall be designed to incorporate unpaved, landscaped islands in number and dimension as required by the city. All landscape islands shall contain a minimum of 180 square feet. Islands which are necessary to promote the safe and efficient flow of traffic shall not be subject to the 100-stall standard and shall be required by the city when warranted. 2. Parking lot landscape areas, including landscape islands, shall be reasonably distributed throughout the parking lot area so as to break up expanses of paved areas. Parking lot landscape areas shall be provided with deciduous shade trees, ornamental or evergreen trees, plus ground cover, mulch and/or shrubbery as determined appropriate by the planning commission. Parking lot landscape trees shall be provided at the rate of one tree for each 15 surface parking spaces provided, or major fraction thereof. Parking lot landscaping shall be contained in planting beds bordered by a raised concrete curb or equivalent approved by the planning commission. d. Maintenance of landscaping. The owner, tenant and their respective agents shall be jointly and severally responsible for the maintenance of all landscaping in a condition presenting a healthy, neat and orderly appearance and free from refuse and debris. Plants and ground cover which are required by an approved site or landscape plan, and which have died, shall be replaced within three months of notification by the city. However, the time for compliance may be extended up to nine months by the city in order to allow for seasonal or weather conditions. e. Retaining walls. Retaining walls exceeding four feet in height, and staged walls which cumulatively exceed 16 feet in height or involve more than four tiers, must be constructed in accordance with plans prepared by a registered engineer or landscape architect. f. Landscaping performance security required. When screening, landscaping or other similar improvements to property are required by this division, a letter of credit shall be supplied by the owner in an amount equal to at least 11/2 times the value of such screening, landscaping or other improvements. The letter of credit shall be conditioned upon reimbursement of all expenses incurred by the city for engineering, legal, contracting or other fees in connection with making or completing such improvements. The letter of credit shall be provided prior to the issuance of any building permit and shall be valid for a period of time equal to two full growing seasons after the date of installation of the landscaping. The city may accept some other form of security in lieu of a letter of credit in an amount and under such conditions that the city may determine to be appropriate. If construction of the project is not completed within the time prescribed by building permits and other approvals, the city may, at its option, complete the work required at the expense of the owner and the surety. The city may allow an extended period of time for completion of all landscaping, if the delay is due to conditions which are reasonably beyond the control of the developer. Extensions, which may not exceed nine months, may be granted due to seasonal or weather conditions. When an extension is granted, the city shall require such additional security as it deems appropriate. g. Screening and buffering. 1. The following uses shall be screened or buffered in accordance with the requirements of this section: i. Principal buildings and structures and any building or structure accessory thereto used for residential uses at a density of greater than four units per acre shall be buffered from residential lots located in any R district. ii. Off-street parking facilities containing six or more spaces shall be buffered from streets located within 50 feet. Parking facilities shall be buffered with landscape zones. iii. Loading docks shall be screened from all lot lines and public roads. iv. Trash storage facilities shall be screened from all lot lines and public roads. v. Access roads serving multifamily buildings shall be screened as necessary to eliminate the impact of vehicle headlights shining toward adjacent residential neighborhoods. 2. Required screening or buffering may be achieved with fences, walls, earth berms, hedges, or other landscape materials. All walls and fences shall be architecturally harmonious with the principal building. Earth berms shall not exceed a slope of 3:1. The screen shall be designed to employ materials which provide an effective visual barrier during all seasons. 3. All required screening or buffering shall be located on the lot occupied by the use, building, facility or structure to be screened. No screening or buffering shall be located on any public right-of-way or within eight feet of the traveled portion of any street or hig hway. 4. Screening or buffering required by subsection (14) of this section shall be of a height needed to accomplish the goals of subsection (14) of this section. Screening methods incorporating roofs over storage, trash or mechanical facilities to screen from higher adjacent properties or buildings may be required. Height of plantings required under subsection (14) of this section shall be measured at the time of installation. (15) Architectural standards. a. It is not the intent of the city to restrict design freedom unduly when reviewing project architecture in connection with a site and building plan. However, it is in the best interest of the city to promote high standards of architectural design and compatibility with surrounding structures and neighborhoods. Architectural plans shall be prepared by an architect or other qualified persons acceptable to the city and shall show the following for all structures other than single-family detached dwellings: 1. Elevations of all sides of the building. 2. Type and color of exterior building materials. 3. A typical floor plan. 4. Dimensions of all structures. 5. The location of trash and recycling containers and of heating, ventilation and air conditioning equipment. b. Unadorned prestressed concrete panels, concrete block and unfinished metal shall not be permitted as exterior materials for residential principal and accessory buildings. This restriction shall apply to all principal structures and to all accessory buildings. The city may, at its discretion, allow architecturally enhanced block or concrete panels. c. Accessory buildings shall be architecturally compatible with principal structures. d. All rooftop or ground-mounted mechanical equipment and exterior trash and recycling storage areas shall be fully enclosed or screened so as to be not visible with materials compatible with the principal structure. e. Underground utilities shall be provided for all new and substantially renovated structures (the term "substantially renovated" shall mean when the renovations exceed 30 percent of the prerenovation value of the structure). (16) Flexibility. The uniqueness of each RPUD requires that specifications and standards for streets, utilities, public facilities and subdivisions may be subject to modification from the city ordinances ordinarily governing them. The city council may therefore approve streets, utilities, public facilities and land subdivisions which are not in compliance with usual specifications or ordinance requirements, if it finds that strict adherence to such standards or requirements is not required to meet the intent of this section or to protect the health, safety or welfare of the residents of the RPUD, the surrounding area or the city as a whole. (17) Traffic studies. The city may require a traffic analysis to be prepared by a registered traffic engineer approved by the city to assess potential traffic impacts on local streets. If impacts on service levels of roadways and intersections are anticipated, the project will be approved only contingent upon a traffic management plan that adequately mitigates those impacts. The plan may include travel demand management strategies, use of transit facilities or other appropriate measures to reduce traffic generation, and necessary improvements to road systems. The developer shall have the responsibility to install all necessary road system improvements. (18) Building permits. No building or other permit shall be issued for any work on property included within a proposed or approved RPUD development, nor shall any work occur unless such work is in compliance with the proposed or approved RPUD development. (19) General regulations applicability. The requirements contained in this division pertaining to general regulations for residential districts and performance standards shall apply to a RPUD development as deemed appropriate by the city. (20) Lighting standards. All RPUD developments shall be subject to the general performance standards for lighting in this chapter. (21) Trails. When any portion of the project is within 1,000 feet of a public trail system, pedestrian access shall be provided to the trail system by means of a public trail constructed at the developer's expense. Where public rights-of-way are available, at the city's discretion the trail may utilize the public right-of-way. Trails shall be of bituminous construction, or such other material as may be approved by the city and shall be not less than eight feet in width. (Ord.No. 202 2nd series, § 1(5), 2-26-2001; Ord. No. 94 3rd series, § 2, 9-24-2012; Ord.No. 189 3rd series, § 6, 4-10-2017) Sec. 78-627. - Review of application; procedures. (a) Concept plan review. In order to receive guidance in the design of a RPUD prior to submission of a formal application, an applicant may submit a concept plan for review and comment by the planning commission and city council. Submission of a concept plan is optional but is highly recommended for large RPUDs. In order for the review to be of most help to the applicant, the concept plan should contain such specific information as is suggested by the city. Generally, this information should include the following: (1) Approximate building, road and trail locations; (2) Height, bulk and square footage of buildings; (3) Type and square footage of specific land uses; (4) Number of dwelling units; (5) Generalized grading plan showing areas to be cut, filled and preserved; and (6) Staging and timing of the development. The comments of the planning commission and city council shall address the consistency of the concept plan with this section. The comments of the planning commission and city council shall be for guidance only and, if positive, shall not be considered binding upon the planning commission or city council regarding approval of the formal RPUD application when submitted. (b) Master development plan and rezoning. Approval of a rezoning to RPUD and approval of a master development plan shall be subject to the procedures outlined in this chapter for a zoning map amendment. The master development plan shall contain the following: (1) Building location, height, bulk and square footage; (2) Type and square footage of specific land uses; (3) Number of dwelling units; (4) Detailed street and utility locations and sizes; (5) Parking layout; (6) Drainage plan, including location and size of pipes and water storage areas; (7) Grading plan and drainage plan, including two-foot contours; (8) Generalized landscape plan; (9) Generalized plan for uniform signs and lighting; (10) Plan for timing and phasing of the development; (11) Covenants or other restrictions proposed for the regulation of the development; (12) Renderings or elevations of all sides of buildings to be constructed in the first phase of the development; (13) Trail plan; and (14) Lighting plan. Approval of the master development plan shall indicate approval of the listed items in subsections (b)(1)—(b)(14) of this section and shall occur in conjunction with rezoning of the property to RPUD. After rezoning the property to RPUD, nothing shall be constructed on the RPUD site except in conformance with the approved plans and this section. The procedure for notification of and public hearing on the master development plan shall be the same as required for a zoning map amendment by this chapter. (c) Development agreement/financial guarantee. Following the approval of the master development plan but prior to final plan approval, the applicant shall enter into an agreement with the city relating to the terms of the RPUD development, and shall also provide such financial guarantees as the city requires or deems necessary. Such agreement may take the form of: (1) A development contract; (2) A site improvement performance agreement; and/or (3) Another form of binding instrument as may be required by the city. (d) Final site and building plan. Approval of a final site and building plan for the entire RPUD or for specific parts of the RPUD shall be subject to the procedures outlined in this division. The final site and building plan shall contain information as required by the city, including the following: (1) Detailed utility, street, grading and drainage plans; (2) Detailed building elevations and floor plans; (3) Detailed landscaping, sign and lighting plans; and (4) Detailed trail plan. (e) Substantial compliance. The final site and building plan shall be in substantial compliance with the approved master development plan. Substantial compliance shall mean: (1) Buildings, parking areas, roads and trails are in substantially the same location as previously approved; (2) The number of residential living units has not increased or decreased from that approved in the master development plan; (3) The gross floor area of any individual building has not been increased from that approved in the master development plan; (4) There has been no increase in the number of stories in any building; (5) Open space has not been decreased or altered to change its original design or intended use; and (6) All special conditions required on the master development plan by the city have been incorporated into the final site and building plan. Approval of a final site and building plan shall signify approval of all plans necessary prior to application for a building permit, subject to conformance with any conditions on the approval and subject to other necessary approvals by the city. (f) Simultaneous review. Applicants may combine the final site and building plan review with the master development plan review by submitting all information required for both stages simultaneously. (g) Basis for approval; conditions. In evaluating a site and building plan, the planning commission and city council shall base their recommendations and actions regarding approval of a RPUD on a consideration of the following: (1) Compatibility of the proposed plan with this section and consistency with the goals, policies, and objectives of the comprehensive plan and surface water management plan; (2) Preservation of the site in its natural state to the greatest extent practicable by minimizing tree and soil removal and designing grade changes to be in keeping with the general character and appearance of neighboring properties; (3) Creation of compatible relationships between buildings and open spaces both on the site and adjacent to it, incorporating natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship to the development, giving special attention to: a. An internal sense of order for the buildings and uses on the site and provision of a desirable environment for occupants, visitors and the general community. b. The amount and location of open space and landscaping. c. Materials, textures, colors and details of construction as an expression of the design concept and the compatibility of the same with the adjacent and neighboring structures and uses; and vehicular and pedestrian circulation, including walkways, interior drives and parking in terms of location and number access points to the public streets, width of interior drives and access points, general interior circulation, separation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic and arrangement and amount of parking. (4) Promotion of energy conservation through design, location, orientation and elevation of structures, the use and location of glass in structures and the use of landscape materials and site grading; (5) Protection of adjacent and neighboring properties through reasonable provisions for surface water drainage, sound and sight buffers, preservation of views, light and air and those aspects of design not adequately covered by other regulations which may have substantial effects on neighboring land uses; and (6) Such other factors as the planning commission or city council deem relevant. The planning commission and city council may attach such conditions to their actions as they shall determine necessary or convenient to better accomplish the purposes of this section. (Ord. No. 202 2nd series, § 1(6), 2-26-2001) Sec. 78-628. -Term of approval. (a) If application has not been made for a final site and building plan approval pursuant to the approved master development plan for all or a part of the property within a RPUD by December 31 of the year following the date on which the RPUD zoning map amendment became effective or, if within that period no extension of time has been granted, the city council may rezone the property to the original zoning classification at the time of the RPUD application or to a zoning classification consistent with the comprehensive plan designation for the property. In the absence of a rezoning, the approved master development plan shall remain the legal control governing development of the property included within the RPUD. (b) If construction on the property included within an approved final site and building plan has not started by December 31 of the year following the date on which such final site and building plan was approved or, if building construction in a phase of a RPUD approved to be built in phases has not started within this period, or, if within that period no extension of the time has been granted, the city council may rezone the property to the original zoning classification at the time of the RPUD application or to a zoning classification consistent with the comprehensive plan designation for the property. In the absence of rezoning, the approved master development plan and final site and building plan shall remain the legal control governing development of the property included within the RPUD. (Ord.No. 202 2nd series, § 1(7), 2-26-2001) Sec. 78-629. -Amendments. Major amendments to an approved master development plan may be approved by the city council after review by the planning commission. The notification and public hearing procedure for such amendment shall be the same as for approval of the original RPUD. A major amendment is any amendment which: (1) Substantially alters the location of buildings, parking areas or roads; (2) Increases or decreases the number of residential dwelling units; (3) Increases the gross floor area of any individual building; (4) Increases the number of stories of any building; (5) Decreases the amount of open space or alters it in such a way as to change its original design or intended use; or (6) Creates noncompliance with any special condition attached to the approval of the master development plan. Any other amendment may be made through review and approval by a simple majority vote of the council. (Ord. No. 202 2nd series, § 1(8), 2-26-2001) Secs. 78-630-78-640. -Reserved. voJv CITY OF ORONO Street Address: Mailing Address: Telephone(952)249-4600 fi ti 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O.Box 66 Fax (952)249-4616 q � Orono,MN 55356 Crystal Bay,MN 55323 www.ci.orono.mn.us &ESHO� March 22,2019 Lakewest,LLC Attn: Perry Ryan VIA EMAIL 14525 Highway 7 Suite#265 perry(a�lwestdev.com Minnetonka, MN 55345 Re: Eisinger Flats File#LA19-000025 Mr. Ryan, The city has received your land use application for your proposed 244 unit apartment complex at 3245 Wayzata Blvd. Your project will initially require approval of a preliminary plat, zone change(from RR-1B to RPUD), and master development plan(site plan). The removal of the former landfill contents will require an Interim Use Permit. Final Plat and Final Master Plan approval will be required to allow issuance of building permits. You have applied for the preliminary plat and the site plan.I do need you to make an application for the zone change and Interim Use Permit. I have added those applications to your file. Please submit the application fees totaling $550.00. The city is required to notify applicants of the completeness of their submittal within 15 days of application. Application#LA19-000025 is incomplete, based on the information outlined below. Please submit these items by April 1st in order to remain on the April 15th Planning Commission agenda. Staff will complete its review of information submitted and provide you comments. These comments are likely to be included as part of the conditions of approval. Site Plan: 1. Tree preservation Plan. Sheet S-1 suggests there are no trees within the development area 6 inches in size or greater. Please confirm. 2. Please provide plumbing and fixture counts. This will be necessary to estimate SAC charges. 3. Please provide a plan for any signage proposed. 4. Please provide a lighting plan for the parking lot lights 5. Please provide hardcover calculations. Our hardcover worksheets can be useful and are attached. Assuming an RPUD zoning, you will be limited to 50% hardcover, including buildings, parking lots, sidewalks, etc. 6. Please provide documentation from the watershed regarding approval of the wetland delineation, erosion control, and stormwater management. Preliminary Plat: 1. Identify all proposed easements on site 2. Conservation design is required for this project,due to both size and density. I understand that one was completed for the Eisinger Meadows project, but did not include this site. 3. Provide the legal description of the property to be platted in word format. I assume you will be platting Eisinger Meadows portion as an outlot,to be replatted at a later date. 4. Provide an erosion control plan. 5. Soils report. Given the history of this site, and as I noted earlier, I'll need something from the MPCA approving the mitigation plan. Given the removal of material, an Interim Use Permit will also be required(see above). 6. Please submit engineering documents and calculations that demonstrate stormwater volume and rate post construction does not exceed preconstruction levels. Interim Use Permit: 1. Haul Route. I'll need to understand the haul route out of the City of Orono. 2. Disposal information. Where will be existing fill be exported to? I am out of the office,returning April 1St. You may provide the stormwater calculations to the City engineer directly (aedwards(aiici.orono.mn.us)to allow that review to commence as soon as possible. Please feel free to contact me at 952.249.4626 or by email at jbarnhart@ci.orono.mn.us if you have any questions on the above requirements. Sincerely, CITY OF ORONO q1-4-7 Jeremy Barnhart,AICP Community Development Director Adam Edwards, City Engineer Enclosures From: Perry Ryan To: )eremy Barnhart Subject: Eisinger Flats-Additional Documents Date: Monday,April 1,2019 4:20:38 PM Attachments: image002.onq Jeremy, (Note, I will attempt to send attachments via email and upload as well,they will come separately due to size) Please find below responses and answers to your letter dated March 22, 2019 that accompany our additional items for the submittal. I will follow the numbering in your letter. Site Plan: 1. All trees on the site are shown within the approved Eisinger Meadows Preliminary Plat. There are no trees within the Eisinger Flats proposal 6 inches or grater in size. 2. The plumbing and fixture counts are as follows from the Architect: a. West Building i. Toilets- 164 ii. Tub/Shower- 160 iii. Sinks-294 b. East Building i. Toilets- 151 ii. Tub/Shower- 151 iii. Sinks- 266 3. There will be an Entrance Monument as shown on the Preliminary Landscape Plan near the entrance at Wayzata Boulevard. Attached, please find the preliminary drawing for the monument. 4. Please find the attached Lighting Plan for the parking lot. 5. Please find attached the completed hardcover calculations. The current calculated hardcover is 36.2%. 6. We assume that a condition of approval will be MCWD approval for the wetland delineation, erosion control, and stormwater management. We will be going through the approval process with the MCWD concurrently with this proposed Preliminary Plat approval procedure at the City and will keep you apprised of their actions. Preliminary Plat: 1. The proposed easements have been added to the Preliminary Plat. 2. We understand that the Conservation Design prepared April 30, 2016 did in fact include the area of the entire parcel as shown on Figure 6 and Figure 7 (pages 23 and 24 of 37 page document attached). We will review with the sub consultant that prepared those documents to determine if updates would be required with the current proposal. 3. The legal description of the property to be platted in word format is included as an attachment. 4. We have included a separate Erosion Control Plan. 5. We have submitted the Response Action Plan (RAP) to the MPCA which is attached. I believe we discussed previously the timing of their approval being by the end of April. This will coincide with the plan to submit the project for cleanup funding to various agencies by the May 1 deadline. 6. Please find attached the engineering calculations for the proposed stormwater treatment system. Interim Use Permit: 1. Haul Route—There are four landfills under consideration for any landfill waste hauling. Routes to all four of them would be exiting the site west on Wayzata Boulevard and continuing Highway 12 westerly or Highway 12 easterly from the site. None of the waste sites currently being considered would take traffic east on Wayzata Boulevard and through town. 2. Disposal Information—Similarly to the response above,the waste will be likely exported to one of four landfills on the western side of the metro. Any landfill site will be as approved through the MPCA. A list of these can be provided if necessary. LAKE VI S PJ DEVELOPMENT,LLC Perry Ryan, PE Vice President—Land Development O 952.653.1359 C 952-221-3700 perryP Iwestdev.com www.lakewestdevelopment.com