HomeMy WebLinkAboutseptic info a ti•�
i � , ! •'.
�
To: Orono residents on mound type septic systems
From: Willie Gibbs, ISTS Manager
Date: 1lllay 10,2006
Re: Landscaping Do's and Don'ts for Mound Systems, Quick Reminder
Do plant and maintain a full cover of grass and keep mowed to a normal height, this grass cover aids
in the evaporation of large amounts of effluent(the liquid left after the"other" stuff has been removed)
in the summer time and ailows the mound system to hetp breakdown nitrogen in the effluent,
Do water the grass over the mound in extreme dry conditions, sparingly.
Do avoid unnecessary foot traffic over the mound, mow it and stay off of it. This is especially true in the
winter time. Even human foot traffic can cause frost to penetrate the mound resulting in potential
freezing problems.
Do inspect your mound system annually for winter kill, (reseed if necessary) animal damage,
(burrowing)or signs of potential failure.
Do not plant trees or shrubs on the mound system, srnaller trees and shrubs may be planted at the
edges. Remember,that sunshine is the key to a healthy rnound system.
Do ask questions, if you have any concems or questions concerning your mound -system
please feel free to call me,I can be reached at 952-249-4626.
1
.. �,
�' ���
O O CI'TY OF ORONO
� � � MuaicipalOffices
�, Street Address Mailing Address:
� G'�' 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O.Box 66
'�.9 �y Orono,MN 55356 Crystal Bay,MN 55323-0066
kEBH��'
To: The Current Owner of Address 3190 SUSSEX RD
City Ordinance requires that onsite sewage treatment systems in Orono be inspected on a
periodic basis. The onsite sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and
the following is known about the system. A sketch of the known components of the system is
available for most properties at the Orono City Hall.
Imminent Public Healt Threat
Yes
No
If yes, please contact the Onsite Systems Manager at 954-249-4626 within 10 days of receipt of
this notice. The septic system must be brought into compliance withiri 90 days. Failure to do so
will result in referral to the City Attorney for legal action.
System Identified as N -Compliant
Yes
No
If yes, system must be brought into compliance by:
I)�ecember 31, 2007
� - December 31;2010 � _ . . _ .
Other
_ _ .
Septic Tank(s) Pui�Sut Needed - � � � �
__.._.__._ � -
Yes _ . _ . .
_ _No._._. _
. _ ...._.._____. . _
The �it�recommends the-septic tank(s).and/or lift ta�k be serviced and pumped out every three
(3) years. City records indicate the tank(s)were last pumped out on l �- � '"1 -b�
The tanTc�s) s�iould be cleaned through the manhole and not through the inspection pipes, this
allows for proper cleaning._.... _ .. .
Comments:
w
Ins ecto� r:" ���—`"`�' ""`-' Date of In ��'�
p spection: /
Telephone �952)249-4600 • Fax(952j 249-4616
www.ci.orono.mn.us
/
� °�
, O __ � ��
� , - � C I�`�' of ORUN�
� ��r�;: r x{ '
'� r� ,,,� . !�`�- _ ,'�+/
,,�� ��a ��, � � ' �, / Municipal Offices
\\��'� �j���r`9� �I�F�`��;�r.�; ('j~i�%
�., ,� �+�, ��+ ,� ;/ Street Address �15a-a4 q'y 60 � Mailing Address:
,;� .�q �;:,�� g i;
�KQ ,�;% 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66
Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066
To urrent Owner: Address: ��1 ��� �.%`�SC''�= �c�
City rdinance 199 requires that each existing on-site sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected every two years.
The n-site sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the categories checked below.
YSTEM CONFORMIT'Y 1-3 : i
"CODE SYSTEA�1" An ISTS which meets all the location,design and construction standards of the current Orono Municipal Code.
"COMPLIANT SYSTEM" An ISTS which does not meet all the location,design and conshuction standards of the current Orono
Municipal Code but does meet the three foot separation requirement or two foot requirement for systems installed 1996 or eazlier,and
which is not failing or an im.n;nent threat to public health or safety.
"NON-COMPLIANT SYSTEM" A prohibited ISTS;an LSTS located within a designated 100-year flood plain,any ISTS which may
or may not meet all the]ocation,design,or construction stan�rds of the cunent Orono Municipal Code and which is faIling for any
r ason;and any ISTS with less than three feet of unsaturated soil or sand between the dish-ibution device and the limiting soil characteristics.
T. NK CONDITION 5-7 : �
Ta :inspection indicates:
5 Pumpout not needed at this time.
6 Septic tanl:s must be pumped out this year (city code recommends tanks to be pumped out once every 3 years.
Tank was last pumped ).
ake sure se tic tanks are um ed throuah manhote and not throu h white ins ection i es. This allows for the ro er
cle nin . Kee water softner and iron filter dischar e out of se tic s stem to rolonQ life of drainfield. Ask um er to test
ala m float to verifv alarm is still worl:in in our house. The alarm warns owner that se ta e is about to backu into basement.
7 Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. Inspection risers(4"dia.pipe)must be installed in each tank. If
tanks have not been pumped out within the last three years,they should be pumped out now.
D INFIELD CONDITION(8-10): �
8 Drainfield is dry,no surfacing evident.
9 Some evidence of surfacing,not critical yet.
1 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact the City Inspector
immediately.Repairs must be completed within 90 days.
COM ENTS:
g �_ ' r"r�p _� `,�_
� �V �L% ..� ��''7�' J����.�.��.�'' "`'�eg� �°.�'_-._,`'�;
Date of Inspection Septic System Inspector
Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a mortgage or other transfer of property, be advised that this report does
not �uar tee or certify that an existing system will continue to func[ion properly, but is merelY an opinion of the adequacy of the system under cuirent
� °� � .
o �:: o
��;����-z Z �� ;M CITY of URONO
� ,�� �����-�� �
7 �A:� �l4 Municipal Offices
� �.
' �` I
,� �`�;�;}����,��g,�G Street Address: Mailing Address:
�C'EgKO 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66
Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, N 55323-0066
To Current Owner: Address: �� Q� SV'���7C �Q�'�
City Ordinance 199 requires that each existing on-site sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected every two yeazs.
The on-site sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the categories checked below.
.�X TEM CONFORMITY 1-3 : I
CODE SYS'TEM"M ISTS which meets all the location,design and construction standards of the current Orono Municipal Code.
2 "COMPLIANT SYSTEM" An ISTS which does not meet all the location,design and construction standards of the current Oroao Municipal
Code but does meet the three foot separation requirement or two foot roquirement for systems instalted 1996 or eartier,and which is not failing or
an imminent threat to pubtic health or safety.
3 "NON-COMPLIANT SYSTEM" A prohibited ISTS;an ISTS located within a designaud 100-year flood plain,any ISTS which may
or may not meet all the location,design,or construction standards of the current Orono Municipal Code and which is failing for eny reason;and
any ISTS with less than three feet of unsaturated soil or sand between the distribution device and the limiting soil characteristics.
TANK CONDITION(5-7): J�
T inspection indicates: �
5 Pumpout not needed at this time.
Septic tanks must be pumped out this year (city code requires tanks to be pumped out once every 3 years.
Tank was last pumped 11' I�'"� ).
Make sure septic tanks are pumped through manhole and not throu2h white insoection uipes. This allows for the
proper cleaninQ. Keeo water softner and iron filter discharge out of seotic svstem.
7 Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. Inspection risers(4"dia.pipe)must be installed in each tank. If
tanks have not been pumped out within the last three years,they should be pumped out now.
D INFIELD C NDITION 8-10 : �
8 rainfield is dry,no surfacing evident.
9 Some evidence of surfacing,not critical yet.
10 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact the City Inspector
immediately.Repairs must be completed within 90 days.
CONIlVIENTS: M���� �— 5��.�. �-��s r��� �K-
i � -� -o3 ���
Date of Inspection Matt Bolterman- Septic System Inspector
Note: In the event that this inspection report is ased to satisfy the requirements for a mortgage or other transfer of property,be advised that ihis roport dces notguerantee
orcertify that an existing system will continue to funcrion properly,but is merely an opinion of the adequacy ofthe system undercurrent wnditions based on the avaitable
information.
Telephone(952)249-4600 • Fax(952)249-4616
avavav ni mm�n�nn ne
� O�
O 'i O
�� CITYof ORON
��_ .
�-�;.=:�=� O
�
,� A�}�'������� �
�►� ,yl,��cfi"��,!�� G'ti,�' Municipa! oftices
� � �r,j;,ig�i Street Addross: Mailin�Addrou:
�ESB� 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66
Orona, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066
ner: �a�n �c�n� Address: 3 I°10 s �S SQ ( d
Ci �Ordinance 199 requires that each e�dsting on-site sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected every rivo years.
Th on-site se�vage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appeazs to fall into the categories checked belo�v.
YSTE�1 CONFO TY 1-3 : ,�
1 "CODE SYSTEM" An ISTS which meets a11 the locatioq desiga and cons4vction standard4 of ihe current Orono�funicipal Code.
2 "CONIPLIANT SYSTEM" An ISTS which does not meet atl the locatioq design and corutruction standatdv upthe cun�nt prono 1�funicipal
Code but doa meet the three foot separatioa nquirement,and w}uch is not failing or an immiaent threat W public health or safety.
3 "NON-COMPLIANT SYSTEM" A prohibited ISTS;an ISTS loqted within a designated 100-year flood plain,any ISTS which cnay
or may not meet all tha locatioq duigi,or construction standards of the cuaeat prono Municipal Code and which is failing for any re�son;and
any ISTS with less than three faet of ucuaturaced soil or sand between the distribution device and the limiting soil characteristics,
A:'JK CONDITION 5-10 : C7
•nk inspection indicates:
Pumpout not needed at this time.
Tank must be pumped out this year (city code requiras tariks co be pumped out avery 3 years. Tank wic last pumped � �.
Solidc accumulation in tanks is at a criticai a critical levei. Tanks should ba pumpad out as soon a�possible.
Syster:is discharging to tht sucface. Tanks must be pumped out wiUtin 48 houts to elimutatz surface discharge,
9 Inspection risars missing-tanks could not be inspected Inspection risecs(4"dia.pipe)must be insta(led in each tank at ne:ct pumpout If taoks
ha�•a nut bern pumped out within the lazt three years,they should be pumped out now.
0 Inspeaion pipe is located diractiy over tank ba@le(does not Bve accuraee measutemrnt of solids accumulation). If tanks have not baen pumped
out within the last three years,they should be pumped out now.
D LD CONDTTION 11-14 : ��
11 ainfield is dry,no surfacing evidrnt
1 Soma evidence of surfacing,not critical yet
1 Dra�e(d is satucaud and visibly dischatging untreatad e@luert to the surface. Contad the Ciry laspector immediately.Rtpaits must be
completed within 90 days.
1 Drainfield estant and condition unknown. �
COi NTS:�S_��„�_ �ob�S n�C '� v n-p �'Q�S
G —�c� —p �
. Date of Inspcctioa • Septic System Inspector '
Note: In the evecrt that this itupection report is used to satisfyr the requiremenit for a moctgage or other transpa of property,be advised that this repoR doa not guaruitee
or certify that an e.risting system will continue to function properly,but is maely an opinion of the adeauacv ef th��e..,,,,.,a.��._�.---�'•'---�
--�--- . .. . ..
�°� �
.� o
.
`�'`v��� CITY of ORONO
�''-` �
� �� ��>�
\� , �.} ��,� � Municipal Offices
P� �': ��'`��'�'' G~ : Street Address: Mailing Address:
l f�i�.��r� �i
�E+ggOg' 2150 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66
Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066
Owner: Address: 3190 Sussex Rd.
Permit #'s: 9090 Dates: 6/13/97 Contractors: Dasen Contracting
(This is [� an existing system [ ] new construction) .
YSTEM COMPLIANCE (1-3) : 1
Code System: Meets or exceeds current City standards in all respects relating to design,
construction, and location. Appears to be operating properly.
Compliant System: Does not meet all current City standards for new construction, but in
most respects appears to be designed, located, and constructed in accordance with previous
codes and is functioning properly.
Non-Compliant System: System may or may not meet current City standards for design,
construction, or location, but is failing to properly treat and dispose of the current
input; and any system with less than three feet of vertical separation between the bottom of
the drainfield and the saturated soil level.
The saturated soil level is [ ] or is not [ ] identified under this septic system. If the
aturated soil level is not id tified, this classification is subject to revision.)
ANK CONDITION (5-9) : 5 •
Pumpout not needed at this time.
Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they should be pumped out this year.
System is discharging to the surface. Tanks must be pumped out within 48 hours.
Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. If tanks have not been pumped out
within three years, they should be pumped out and risers installed now.
Inspection pipe is located over tank baffle-can not measure solids accumulation. If tanks
have not been pumped out within three years, they should be pumped out now.
0 One or more tanks are cesspools, which means the septic system is non-compliant.
The tanks are [ ] or are not [ ] water tight or the condition is [ ] unknown. If the tanks
re not confirm to be watertight, this classification is subject to revision.)
INFIELD CONDITION (11-14) : 11
1 Drainfield is dry, no surfacing evident.
Some evidence of surfacing, not critical yet. Repair is not required at this time.
13 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact
the City Inspector immediately. Repair must be completed within 90 days.
1 Drainfield extent and condition unknown.
P TENTIAL FOR SYSTEM FAILURE: (s stem a e and condition, soils, etC. ) : low
C MMENTS:
��g qq
Date of Inspecti n ep ' System Inspe tor
N te: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a
t ansfer of property, this report does not guarantee that an existing, system will continue to
f nction properly, but indicates the operation of the system under current conditions.
Telephone(612)249-4600 • Fax(612)249-4616
� O�
O_�:,���� O
-���� -� CITY of ORONO
� ��:.
� , ,,�; ;
, �����` :.�s�_- ,�14 Municipal Offices
� �� �. G
���`�� g.� Street Address: Mailing Addross:
�!'EgHO 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66
Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323•0066
O er: (�� Address: 3190 Sussex Rd.
P rmit #'s: 9090 Dates: 6/13/97 Contractors: Dasan Coatracting
( his is ( ] an existing system [� new construction) .
STEM COMPLIANCE (1-3) : 1
1 Code System: Meets or exceeds current City standards in all respects relating to design,
construction, and location. Appears to be operating properly.
2 Compliaht System: Does not meet all current City standards for new construction, but in
mos�. r�spects appears to be designed, located, and constructed in accordance with previous
codes �nd is functioning properly.
3 Non-C¢mpliant System: System may or may not meet current City standards for design,
construction, or location, but is failing to properly treat and dispose of the current
input; and any system with less than three feet of vertical separation between the bottom
of the drainfield and the saturated soil level.
( he saturatad soil level [�] has or [ ] has aot been identified at this tima. If the
s turatad soil level has not been identified, this classification is subject to revision.)
K CONDITION (5-9) : 5
Pumpout not needed at this time.
6 Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they should be pumped out this year.
7 System is discharging to the surface. Tanks must be pumped out within 48 hours.
8 Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. If tanks have not been pumped out
within three years, they should be pumped out and risers installed now.
9 Inspection pipe is located over tank baffle-can not measure solids accumulation. If tanks
have not been pumped out within three years, they should be pumped out now.
( ring tha last septic taak Maintanance Pumpout the tanks [x] were or [ ] were aot confirmad
t be watertiQht by tha licansad pumpinQ contractor. If the tanks were not coafirmed to be
tertiQht, this classification is subjact to revision.)
D INFIELD CONDITION (11-14) : 11
Drainfield is dry, no surfacing evident.
Some evidence of surfacing, not critical yet. Repair is not required at this time.
13 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface.
Contact the City Inspector immediately. Repair must be completed within 90 days.
14 Drainfield extent and condition unknown.
PO ENTIAL FOR SYSTEM FAILURE: (s stem a e and condition, soils, etc. ) : low
CO S:
� �
Ic�31�
Date of Inspe tion Sept' System Inspector
No e: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a
tr nsfer of property, this report does not guarantee that an existing system will continue to
fu ction properly, but indicates the operation of the system under current conditions.
Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510
SEPTIC SYSTEM INFORMATION ,
STREET ADDRESS .3l�Q �/�'SS�C�
LOT � BLOCK____1__ SUBDIVISION���� , �X ,���_
MONTH AND YEAR TESTING DONE Th'e �9�
ITEMS ALREADY COMPLETED .�j Y7�� , � p,e►rG�, _�lT� �,Li�"��
��� � � ��� ..
NEED TO COMPLETE BEFORE ISSUING BUILDING PERMIT:
�BORINGS �
����
OPERC TESTS
SYSTEM DESIGN ��/a v �� �Q�
SITE PLAN� FINA"�-�
O OTHER
OCOMMENTS ,w
DATE THZS SHEET FILED_ oZ' I BY `,]''�VP� 1 r'JC�i�----
SUBDIVISION FILE NO. !y�/
To: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator
grom; Michael P. Gaff ron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator
Date: August 22, 1989
Subject: Preliminary Plat of Fox Bend - Septic System Testing
Septic system site evaluations for this 17-lot subdivision
ha�heen submitted. Additionally, a topographical survey of the
property containing a plot of the drainfield sites has been
submittedn
���(Z�
I make the following comments re arding each proposed lot:
Lot 1, Block l. Primary and alternate sites have been
located. Both t�e sites require a mound system due to high
seasonal water tables. Slopes range from 2�-6$. These two
sites are about 50' from a proposed detention basin, but
should not affect nor be affected by that basin. The sites
should be totally fenced off with snow fencing before any
road or detention basin construction takes place in the
subdivision.
Lot 2, Block 1. Primary and alternate sites have been
located, and both sites have soil and water table conditions
to allow for a trench drainfield system. With the proposed
house site at the south end of the lot, there should be no
problem preserving these sites. Again, the drainfield area
should be fenced off to keep all traffic away during road
and detention basin construction.
Lot 3, Bl.ock l. Again, primary and alternate drainfield
% sites are suitable for trench systems. The two sites are at
the rear of the lot. With the most likely house site near
the front of the lot , these sites appear to be very
suitable.
Lot 4, Block 1. Primary and alternate drainfield sites are
located on the knob at the southwest corner of the property. .
Both sites require mound systems. With the house site
suited for a walk-out to the northeast, a driveway would
likely be centered on the lot east of the drainfield sites.
Slopes are in the range of 3�, and not accurately ref lected
by the topographic map. It is critical to totally enclose
these sites with snow fence prior to any road construction
work, since the sites are very close to the road. Also,
road grades and cuts should be reviewed to verify that the
roadwork will not cut into site #2.
Lot 5, Block 1. Primary and alternate drainfield sites are
located to the rear of the property on slopes of 0-2$. Both
sites require a mound system. With the probable house
�o�at�e� centrally located oa the lot, these sites appear
very suitable.
Preliminary Plat of Fox Bend - Septic System Testing
August 22, 1989
Page 2 of 4
Lot 6, Block 1. The drainfield sites are near the rear
property line, and not likely to be affected by construction
traffic. These sites are located about 70' back from the
travelled portion of Luce Line Trail, and should have no
affect nor be affected by the trail. Slopes are virtually
flat. Again, the likely house location would be in the
center of the lot. Depending on final house location,
additional sites might be located on this property.
Lot 1, Block 2. Primary and alternate drainfield sites have
been located at the north end of the lot, adjacent to the
proposed road connection to Leaf Street. These sites both
require mound systems, and this is perhaps the most critical
lot of this subdivision since drainfield sites are uphill
from the proposed house location and surrounded on two sides
by proposed road construction. These sites must be
surrounded by snow fence to avoid any construction traffic.
The building envelope is large enough that a house can be
constructed leaving approximately 50-60' or more setback
from the drainfield sites. I would further recommend that
no driveways or other grading be constructed within 30' of
the toe of the mound sites. Again, the contour lines shown
on the topographic survey do not quite jive with elevations
found in the field.
Lot 2, Block 2. Primary and alternate drainfield sites are
located at the southeast corner of the property near Fox
Street. The house site would be located north of the pond
area. The two drainfield sites tested must be preserved,
' since they are the only two available sites on the property,
both requiring mounds. From a technical standpoint,
location of drainfield systems as much as 300-350' away from
the house should not cause any problems.
Lot 3, Block 2. Both primary and alternate drainfield sites
were located on the property. The primary site would be .
suitable for a trench-type system. The alternate site would
require a mound. Both sites are located in the wooded area
of the lot.
Lot 4, Block 2. Both primary and alternate drainfield sites
have been located. Those sites ase generally parallel
with the proposed road and near the north lot line. These
sites definitely need to be snow fenced totally in order to
preserve them during road construction.
� f
Preliminary Plat of Fox Bend - Septic System Testing
August 22, 1989
Page 3 of 4
Lot 5, Block 2. Primary and alternate sites are located
about a third of the way back into the lot off the road,
just above the woods. While additional sites probably could
be located in the woods, the sites leave a relatively small
building envelope near the road. Again, the sites need to
be snow fenced to keep construction traffic off of them.
Both sites require mounds.
Lot 6, Block 2. Primary and alternate sites, both being
mound systems, are located near the north end of the
property near the road. Again, topographic contours vary
slightly from those shown on the survey. Slopes range from
3-6$. These sites force the house location to be more
centrally located on the property. The sites need to be
snow fenced to avoid traffic during road construction.
Lot 7, Block 2. Both primary and alternate drainfield sites
are located near the north end of this lot. Both sites
require mound systems. The sites allow for great
flexibility in house location.
Lot 1, Block 3. Primary and alternate drainfield sites,
both being mound systems, have been located on the property.
House location would be relatively near the cul-de-sac. The
primary site somewhat limits the potential house locations.
Lot 2, Block 3. Primary and alternate drainfield sites,
both being mounds, are located near the westerly corner of
this property. These sites definitely need to be fenced off
''during road construction, since they are in a prime "short-
cut". area.
Lot 3, Block 3. Both primary and alternate sites are
located at the extreme east end of the property, leaving
great f lexibility in house placement. These sites are not
likely to be disturbed during construction of roadways. .
Lot 4, Block 3. The two drainfield sites are centrally
located on the property, having some significant effect on
house placement. The site evaluator anticipated the
existing house would be removed, with a newer house pZaced
to the northeast corner of the lot. House placement will
have to take into account the drainfield sites. Both sites
require a mound.
• Preliminary Plat of Fox Bend - Septic System Testing
August 22, 1989
Page 4 of 4
General Comments -
Each proposed lot appears to have suitable primary and
alternate drainfield sites. On some lots, the primary and
alternate sites shown are the onl possible sites available. On
other lots, it is likely that additional testing could f ind a
number of potential sites, allowing additional flexibility in
house placement.
In each case, drainfield sites have been designed to meet
the minimum 20' setback from property Iines, and 75' setbacks
rom designated wetlands.
On the majority of lots, extreme caution must be taken
uring construction of improvements to the property. Road
onstruction will take place within 50' of tested drainf ield
ites on at least 6 of 17 lots, and on 2 lots the sites are
elatively near the area proposed to be graded to provide a
etention basin. I would recommend that each lot have drainfield
ites protected by snow fence totally surrounding the drainfield
ites at a distance 20' from the boundaries of each drainfield
system. Additionally, when road construction plans are
s bmitted, I would like to review them to determine where road
c t would have a potential impact on drainfield sites.
S ry -
Out of 34 drainfield sites tested, 29 require mound systems
a d 5 would allow a trench-type system. Each lot has primary and
a ternate sites designated. It would not be surprising if as
ma y as 20$ of the sites ultimately will have to be re-tested due
to the buyer's preference for house sites near or conflicting
wi h drainfields. Some lots are extremely limited for potential
dr infield sites, others provide a degree of flexibility in house
pl cement.
Given the above facts, concerns, and constraints, I would
re ommend approval of the subdivision as proposed. Accompanying
th' s memo is a topographic survey of the preliminary plat showing
po ential house locations and locations of both primary and
alt rnate drainfield sites.
�
N,
li
� � j
, `,t ;� ! • � N B9 'o,� '� ''w
, t i ,I , 'r
�
`; i � ��
' p � f � ' a
� � ., I �� F �� j` ' _._.�b � .
� �'� 6 1 I t � � � .
�a ;i '► ; ;" A .��,p , �� � � i
�r, .� � , + \
Ir[, �a 4 {` �������' � a i_:F _ ' �� � ' � � � .
I9 �f�� ; � p1�
i ^` � rM R ..Z � / �� � ` � �
'� �Rr "� `' � � ' � �
�4,":,� � � ��•� 1 `� D�,�' �/ r , \�� `� �� d " `
,�w�► 17i.�o � 9 Z � .
�: z ; ,� ' � � , � � ` �
�,�; �,� � ''' �' ► � � + � �
a� , .
� � r�� � y � .p . \ � �
E1�►a�i�,! t ` r � � .
�
r �
� ,r 'f 4 . � . \ � `
/sv= lp74 O : X � , �
».�t s '!7 D � � � . ! � _.,_ '�
<<,� ,,, , r "' ` �
,��, '� ;� 33 � t . _ ._.. ' � � �
'� a ,p � � , � � \ / ,/
�i � ,
� a ��� �' .
� "� E 1 , ''` �+.� �
„ y, � � � � ,� �� � C
.°. �� ' .�..�
��; �� ��� f � �� `'' �� _ �
� � t ��� � w Ri � �� �
I�� �` ��I i � �
µ� �i +�� i� � �I�' ,
� �6 7 d
f���'�;4� �#�!� � � il d . �
�as'' Z� d�� i �. � �� �
h� �� ' .t !„� . ♦
� ' , � �` � ` � .68 f 4Cr�1
�i � � � � '� . � �
� ; s � � ?. t cic. �r
, � M .
, f � � � ,,� 1� f � � / � 6
' ; � fi ��'h , •: �
,��.. , , �� ,, �w r
� �
u�,;a��l ' � ,` �j ' I �: '� t t � �.�.��,` `i
� �� �1 � r.;���� `,� r.� �' � I �� � � �
i
6� � � i i., �.. �� , �
`� �� � h t� � :�, �wo . �
t �+ •+w�� \� O � 1
�� � I I /�
�����! � � I � ' '.� � � � � �O .��~
r i j `
� � �
���� � �� o �
y:. ' '• r,, /� � � � \ J`�p �, "; �
, .�
' y A t� � ' 4 ; � ` `� �� � �
, Y �,.
' Syl''�` � ? i.�' y � � +� ` \ � � ,, �
r�, Q' ' ','+ • '� � � �� �,/�'' ` \ ' �.- �"' � p .
� ,
i�� ��� ;�! I � ' r �! � � �� `� ` i � I
�� ��� � �'�:�; r r� '�` .r j � � � �
; 3 .,.
�,, ► , �: , �+e \
� �
��,;, { , f � �,.� �: ��� /' � . ?.� ,, �
� ,� .�`� "'p�YC.r
rt, E� sh� �r � � Q. ' / � �' �' .�Q � `� � aC�rv r /� �
�jr i ' i
r
t��� j� �y�,(� � �j r � � � �
� G 4 � ��,
F�` � � � � . , � /�
wti�; +� _ '� $, ♦ ; �f � � �. .
, S � ,�
.
��� ��., �' r �
R( € '
��, �' �� � � / \
,1;4 �a� �k� "�'� r � � �/' � � •��/ �vr���,
; 4� � �i�
d a '' � E d � :� #��' � � � �'l �i•�� �d
r�'� �<�p <��' � : ����� � i�� U �, / � �-- A -,
'��T °'1 �� �.w , '� ,� � � � �
��'��h��(�, � , � ' y�� � Z7Q« � �� 1
, ' � � t2 i , ...:
�� '� �' � i - � � :. ' � .
' � b� SO
� ���d��� I � �i ,
��a � '' � f� �!
. . ��� Mw1�M��iw , wi1li�,p.Yk >r.
� �l� l ''�� ,
,
_ �
� .; ,,i ; ,