HomeMy WebLinkAboutseptic info SEPTIC SYSTEM INVENTORY
site address: 3011 Sussex Rd PID: 0411723320018
Owner Name: Juan&Renee L.Cristiani
Owner Address: 3011 Sussex Rd Long Lake MN 55356
Building Type: residence Installer:
Date of Permit: 1 /27/98 Clover Hill Co.
System Type: mound BRs Designed for: 4
In Musa?: No Shoreland?:
SEPTIC COMPLIANCE INSPECTION
Report Date:
Compliant
Expires:
Non-Compliant?: Report in Street File?:
SPECIAL NOTES Site Address: 3011 Sussex Rd
03/16/09 2009 Septic Maintenance Report Letter Sent
SEPTIC TANKS
Material: precast concrete Capacity: 1000, 1000, 1000 Tank Filter:
DRAINFIELD
Treatmerrt Area: 90*45 Soil Boring: yes DF Ht above Wt: 3
WELL DATA
Setbacks-Well-Tanks: Well-DF: Report in File?: Depth: 135
INSPECTION RECORD PUMPOUT RECORD
Date Description Date Gallons
6/23/98 installation 07/31/01 2000
4/28/99 no surfacing 08/04/04 2000
9/18/01 code system,no surfacing 08/07/07 2500
10/1/03 no surfacing,pump tanks 2004
06/21/05 Okay,pump tanks
07/01/07
4/6/2009
10:17:40 AM
.. �.
� �` s �
�
To: Orono residents on mound type septic systems
Prom: Wlllie Gibbs, ISTS Manager
Date: May 10,2006
Re: Landscaping Do's and Don'ts for Mound Systems, Quick Reminder
Do plant and maintain a full cover of grass and keep mowed to a normal height, this grass cover aids
in the evaporation of large amounts of effluent(the liquid left after the"other" stuff has been removed)
in the summer time and allows the mound system to hetp breakdown nitrogen in the effluent,
Do water the grass over the mound in extreme dry conditions, sparingly.
Do avoid unnecessary foot traffic over the mound, mow it and stay off of it This is especially true in the
winter time. Even human foot traffic can cause frost to penetrate the mound resuiting in potential
freezing problems.
Do inspect your mound system annually for winter kill, (reseed if necessary) animal damage,
(burrowing)or signs of potential failure.
Do n�t plant trees or shrubs on the mound system, smaller trees and shrubs may be planted at the
edges. Remember,that sunshine is the key to a healthy mound system.
Do ask questions, if you have any concerns or questions concerning your mound system
please feel free to call me, I can be reached at 952-249-4626.
1
� �
�O�V
O O CIZ'Y OF ORONO
� � Municipal Offices
�,, �, Street Address Maiiiag Address:
t� �j'�' 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66
'�.9 .¢�i Orono,MN 55356 Crystal Bay,MN 55323-0066
kEsHo
To: The Current Owner of Address 3011 SUSSEX RD
City Ordinance requires that onsite sewage treatment systems in Orono be inspected on a
periodic basis. The onsite sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and
the following is known about the system. A sketch of the known components of the system is
available for most properties at the Orono City Hall.
Imminent Public Health Threat
Yes �No
If yes, please contact the Onsite Systems Manager at 954-249-4626 within 10 days of receipt of
this notice. The septic system must be brought into compliance within 90 days. Failure to do so
will result in referral to the City Attorney for legal action.
System Identified as Non-Compliant
Yes
No
If yes, system must be brought into compliance by:
December 31, 2007
December 31, 2010
Other
Septic Tank(s) Pump�ut Needed
Yes �
No
The city recommends the septic tank(s) andlor lift tank be serviced and pumped out every three
(3) years. City records indicate the tank(s)were last pumped out on_ $-p�
The ta.nk(s) should be cleaned through the manhole and not through the inspection pipes, this
allows for proper cleaning.
Comments:
�
�sp ,�Q��`°'�� ��C�� Date of Inspection: �� O �
Telephone (952)249-4600 • Fax(952)249-4616
waw.ci.oroao.mn.us
� °�
o..��.y _ o
�„��=�� C ITY of ORONO
,� '+�����= �
, �
? * "` Mi1111C1pa1 D�C@S
�,�� �;���, .,. ;.���� �
� �� r� �
\� �•,:- ����r 4,�,G/ Street Address: `'�5a-a49—y 6o O Mailing Address:
'� �,e,;.. .
.. x'�KQ ' 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66
��� Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066
To Current Owner: Address: `3c r 1 `��S s�� x �,
City Ordinance 199 requires that each existing on-site sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected every two years.
The on-site sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the categories checked below.
SYSTEM COIVFORMIT'Y (1-3): 1
1 "CODE SYSTEM"An LSTS which meets all the location,design and construction standards of the current Orono Municipal Code.
2 "COMPLIANT SYSTEM" An LSTS which does not meet all the location,design and construcdon standards of the current Orono
Municipal Code but does meet the three foot separation requirement or two foot requirement for systems installed 1996 or earlier,and
which is not failing or an imminent threat to public health or safety.
3 "NON-COMPLIANT SYSTEM" A prohibited ISTS;an ISTS located within a designated 100-year flood plain,any ISTS which may
or may not meet all the location,design,or construction stan�rds of the current Orono Municipal Code and which is failiag for any
reason;and any ISTS with less than three feet of unsaturated soil or sand between the dishibution device and the limiting soil characterisdcs.
TANK CONDTTION(5-7): (C7
Tank inspection indicates:
5 Pumpout not needed at this time.
6 Septic tanks must be pumped out this year (city code recommends tanks to be pumped out once every 3 years.
Tank was last pumped �7- �t "O 1 ).
Make sure semtic tanks are aumaed throush manhole and not throuEh white inspection pipes. This allows for the uroper
cleaninE. Keea water softner and iron filter discharse out of septic system to prolong life of drainfield. Ask numper to test
alarm float to verifv alarm is still workin¢in your house. T6e alarm warns owner that septage is about to backua into basement.
7 Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. Inspection risers(4"dia.pipe)must be installed in each tank. If
tanks have not been pumped out within the last three years,they should be pumped out now.
DR.AINFIELD CONDITION(8-10): �
8 Drainfield is dry,no surfacing evident,
9 Some evidence of surfacing,not critical yet.
10 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact the City Inspector
immediately.Repairs must be completed within 90 days.
COMMENTS:
�, - ;,� f —c�J .� ���.,�.�.
�,
Date of Inspeetion Septic System Inspector
Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a mortgage or other transfer of property, be advised that this report does
not guarantee or certify that an existing system will continue to function properly, but is merely an opinion of the adequacy of the system under current
� °� �
o .:t o
��`���y��� �� CITY of ORONO
� q'�i�5 'a � ;�
�
� •f�V.�
. 1,�� �� ���� �Rr Munfcipal Offices
� 7
� �! {.
��. ��`' ��`�G Street Address: Mailing Address:
�9$�;gKOg' 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Baz 66
Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323•0066
To Current Owner: Address: 3 0 I
� SuSS�X O�.o�(J
City Ordinance 199 requires that each existing on-site sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected every two yeazs.
The on-site sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appeazs to fall into the categories checked below.
TEM CONFORMITY 1-3 : j
'CODE SYSTEM" M ISTS which meets all the location,design end construction standards of the current Orono Municipal Code.
2 "COMPLIANT SYST'EM" An ISTS which does not meet all the location,design and construction standards of the current Orono Municipal
Code but does meet the three foot separation requirement or two foot requirement for systems installed 1996 or earlier,and which is not failing or
an imminent throat to public health or safety.
3 "NON-COMPLIANT SYSTEM" A prohibited ISTS;en ISTS located within a designated 100-year flood plain,any ISTS which may
or may not meet all tho location,design,or construction standards of the current Orono Municipal Code and which is failing for any reason;and
any ISTS with less than throe feet of unsaturated soil or sand between the distribution device and the limiting soil characteristics.
TANK CONDITION(5-71: C�
Tank inspection indicates:
�Pumpout not needed at this time.
Septic tanks must be pumped out this yeaz (city code requires tanks to be pumped out once every 3 years.
Tank was last pumped �7�I-01 ).
Make sure seotic tanks are aum�ed throu¢h manhole and not throu¢h white insaection pipes. This allows for the
proper cleaning. Keep water softner and iron filter dischar�e out of sentic svstem.
7 Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. Inspection risers(4"dia.pipe)must be installed in each tank. If
tanks have not been pumped out within the last three years,they should be pumped out now.
DRAINFIELD CONDITION 18-10): �
��Drainfield is dry,no surfacing evident.
�"'Some evidence of surfacing,not critical yet.
10 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact the City Inspector
immediately.Repairs must be completed within 90 days.
co�rrrs: �o,��� \ooY-S o�.. � �� ScP�.=� �-w.� S U�.�
�.oc�� ,
�o -\--U'� �c� J��,�
Date of Inspection Matt Bolterman - Septic System Inspector
Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requimments for a martgago or other transfer of property,be advised that this report does not guarentee
or certify that an existing system will condnue to function properly,but is merely an opinion of the adequacy ofthe system undercurrent conditions based on the available
information.
Telephone(952)249-4600 • Fax(952)?A9-4616
www_ci_nrnnn_mn.uc
� °�
O��a` O
����T� CITY of ORONO
,*� �,��;;��;��� �,
'�� r.��,v '��,�� G'ti Municipal Of'fices
't '�'%"�;`;r`�g�i Street Addreu: Mailin�Addreu:
�ESH� 2150 Kelley Pa�1cway P.O. Bax 66
Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066
Owner: �J�i c� C..(' �5� ��,n. Address: 3�11 5�5 Se
Cin�Ordinance 199 requires that each e�dsting on-site sewage�eatment system in Orono be inspected every rivo years.
The on-site seti�•age treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the categories checked belo�v.
�ST'EN1 CONFORMITY (1-3): �
"CODE SYST'EM" An ISTS which meets a11 the locatioc�drssi�and cons4uction sfartdards of the
current Orono�iunicipal Code.
2 "CONiPLIANf SYST'EM" An ISTS which does not meet all the locatioq design and constructian staadar�of�z��t p�no Municipa!
Code but does mcet the three foot separatioa requirement,and which is not failing or an imminent thceat to public health or safety.
3 "NON-COMPLIANT SYSTEM" A pcohibited ISTS;an ISTS located within a designated 100-year IIood pL�ir�any ISTS which may
or may not meet a11 tha locatioq daign,or constructien stand��o f����p�no�funicipal Code and which is failing for any reason;and
any ISTS with less than three&d of unsaturated soil or sand between the disttibution device and tha limiting seil characeeristics,
T.�NK CONDITION(5-101: �
Tank inspection indicates:
OPumpout not naedad at this time.
6 Tank must be pumpad out this year (city code requires tatilcs to be pumped out every 3 yeazs. Tank wac tast pumped ����`� I �
7 Solids accumutadon in tanks is at a criticai a etitica!level. Tanks should ba pumpad out�s soon as possible.
8 System is discharging to the surfaca Tarikc must be pumped eut w•ithin qg hours to eliminate surface discharge.
9 Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspectad Inspection risers(4"dia,pipe)must be instal(ed in each t�nlc a2 next pumpout If tanics
ha��e nut bern pumped outµithin the Iast three years,they should be pumped out now.
10 IruQection pipe is located d'uectly over tank ba81e(dou not give accurate measurement of solids accumulation). If tacilcs havo not been pumped
out within the lact three yeus,they should be pumpad out now.
D LD CONDITION 11-1�t : _�
i l aintield'u dry,no surfacing evidrnt
1? Some evidance of surfacing,not critical yet
13 Drainfitld'u satutztad and visibly discharging untroatad effluert W tha surfue. Contad the City Inspectur irnmediate(y.R�p�must bt
complated within 90 days.
1� Drainfie(d e:ctent snd condition unknown. �'
COMI�NTS: 5 � S�'C ^. �D��S C� C -
°`�� -b � ��c
. Date of Inspection • S tic S �
�p ystem Iaspeetor
Note: In the evrnt thac this it�tpection repoR it used to satisfy the requireme�s foc a mortgage or otha�arsfer of property,be advised that this report doa not guarantee
or certify that an e�dsting systtm wi11 continue W function propnly,but is metely an opisrion of the adequacy of the systetn undcr cuttent conditio�based on the availahla
informztioa
� °�
o ,� o
�'��-� CITY of ORONO
� � ����=a���� �
�!? 5�'��''' ��, Municipal Offices
� ` �'�-''��� G
'��� �`�-.�"�"' SVeet Address: Mailing Addross:
r i,�. '�!
'�l(�HQ'¢' 2150 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66
Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066
Owner: T�� ir�j��� Address: 3011 Sussex Rd.
Permit #'s: 9904 Dates: 1/27/98 Contractors: Clover Hill Co.
(This is [x] an existing system [ ] new construction) .
J
STEM COMPLIAIQCE (1-3) : 1
1 Code System: Meets or exceeds current City standards in all respects relating to design,
construction, and location. Appears to be operating properly.
2 Compliant System: Does not meet all current City standards for new construction, but in
most respects appears to be designed, located, and constructed in accordance witti previous
codes and is functioning properly.
3 Non-Compliant System: System may or may not meet current City standards for design,
construction, or location, but is failing to properly treat and dispose of the current
input; and any system with less than three feet of vertical separation between the bottom of
the drainfield and the saturated soil level.
(The saturated soil level is (�j or is not [ ] identified under this septic system. If the
saturated soil level is not identified, this classification is subject to revision.)
NK CONDITION (5-9) : 5
5 Pumpout not needed at this time.
6 Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they should be pumped out this year.
7 System is discharging to the surface. Tanks must be pumped out within 48 hours.
8 Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. If tanks have not been pumped out
within three years, they should be pumped out and risers installed now.
9 Inspection pipe is located over tank baffle-can not measure solids accumulation. If tanks
have not been pumped out within three years, they should be pumped out now.
10 One or more tanks are cesspools, which means the septic system is non-compliant.
(The tanks are [� ] or are not [ ] water tight or the condition is [ ] unknown. If the tanks
are not confirmA�to be watertight, this classification is subject to revision.)
INFIELD CONDITION (11-14) : 11
1 Drainfield is dry, no surfacing evident.
Some evidence of surfacing, not critical yet. Repair is not required at this time.
13 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact
the City Inspector immediately. Repair must be completed within 90 days.
14 Drainfield extent and condition unknown.
POTENTIAL FOR SYSTEM FAILURE: (system age and condition, soils, etc.) : lom
CO[�7ENTS:
— �i� ,
Date of Inspection e tic System Inspe tor
Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a
transfer of property, this report does not guarantee that an existing• system will continue to
function properly, but indicates the operation of the system under current conditions.
Telephone(612)249-4600 • Fax(612)249-4616
SEPTIC SYSTEM INFORMATION ,
STREET ADDRESS `,Q�1 SL,IrnP,,��,�I
LOT BLOCK SUBDIVISION �j�� �'�i
MONTH AND YEAR TESTING DONE �/�
ITEMS ALREADY COMPLETED A �
and �i�5�'� LC�s,q� .�r a Y' l� h�')')e
NEED TO COMPLETE BEFORE ISSUING BUILDING PERMIT:
OBORINGS �
OPERC TESTS
SYSTEM DESIGN �Qf G� "ra S�1'. I lG1Y1
� SITE PLAN
O OTHER
OCOMMENTS `A
DATE THIS SHEET FILED � BY �TY✓C li1���:K/�U�
SUBDIVISION FILE NO.
r `
To: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator
Fro�: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator
Date: August 22, 1989
Subject: Preliminary Plat of Fox Bend - Septic System Testing
Septic system site evaluations for this 17-lot subdivision
hal�been submitted. Additionally, a topographical survey of the
property containing a plot of the drainfield sites has been
submitt�edf�
I^make the following comments regarding each proposed lot:
Lot 1, Block 1. Primary and alternate sites have been
located. Both tfre sites require a mound system due to high
seasonal water tables. Slopes range from 2�-6�. These two
sites are about 50' f rom a proposed detention basin, but
should not affect nor be affected by that basin. The sites
should be totally fenced off with snow fencing before any
road or detention basin construction takes place in the
subdivision.
Lot 2, Block 1. Primary and alternate sites have been
located, and both sites have soil and water table conditions
to allow for a trench drainfield system. With the proposed
house site at the south end of the lot, there should be no
problem preserving these sites. Again, the drainfield area
should be fenced off to keep all traffic away during road
and detention basin construction.
Lot 3, Block 1. Again, primary and alternate drainfield
y� sites are suitable for trench systems. The two sites are at
the rear of the lot. With the most likely house site near
the front of the lot, these sites appear to be very
suitable.
Lot 4, Block 1. Primary and alternate drainfield sites are
located on the knob at the southwest corner of the property. .
Both sites require mound systems. With the house site
suited for a walk-out to the northeast, a driveway would
likely be centered on the lot east of the drainfield sites.
Slopes are in the range of 3$, and not accurately ref lected
by the topographic map. It is critical to totally enclose
these sites with snow fence prior to any road construction
work, since the sites are very close to _the road. Also,
road grades and cuts should be reviewed to verify that the
roadwork will not cut into site #2.
Lot 5, Block 1. Primary and alternate drainfield sites are
located to the rear of the property on slopes of 0-2$. Both
sites require a mound system. With the probable house
centrally located oA the lot, these sites appear
very suitable. .
r ,
Preliminary Plat of Fox Bend - Septic System Testing
August 22, 1989
Page 2 of 4
Lot 6, Block 1. The drainfield sites are near the rear
property line, and not likely to be affected by construction
traffic. These sites are located about 70' back from the
travelled portion of Luce Line Trail, and should have no
affect nor be affected by the trail. Slopes are virtually
flat. Again, the likely house location would be in the
center of the lot. Depending on final house location,
additional sites might be located on this property.
Lot 1, Block 2. Primary and alternate drainfield sites have
been located at the north end of the lot, adjacent to the
proposed road connection to Leaf Street. These sites both
require mound systems, and this is perhaps the most critical
lot of this subdivision since drainfield sites are uphill
from the proposed house location and surrounded an two sides
by proposed road construction. These sites must be
surrounded by snow fence to avoid any construction traffic.
The building envelope is large enough that a house can be
constructed leaving approximately 50-60' or more setback
from the drainfield sites. I would further recommend that
no driveways or other grading be constructed within 30' of
the toe of the mound sites. Again, the contour lines shown
on the topographic survey do not quite jive with elevations
f ound in the f ield.
Lot 2, Block 2. Primary and alternate drainfield sites are
located at the southeast corner of the property near Fox
Street. The house site would be located north of the pond
area. The two drainfield sites tested must be preserved,
' since they are the only two available sites on the property,
both requiring mounds. From a technical standpoint,
location of drainfield systems as much as 300-350' away from
the house should not cause any problems.
Lot 3, Block 2. Both primary and alternate drainfield sites
were located on the property. The primary site would be .
suitable for a trench-type system. The alternate site would
require a mound. Both sites are located in the wooded area
of the lot.
Lot 4, Block 2. Both primary and alternate drainfield sites
have been located. Those sites are generally parallel
with the p=oposed road and near the north lot 3.ine. These
sites definitely need to be snow fenced totally in order to
preserve them during road construction.
Preliminary Plat of Fox Bend - Septic System Testing
August 22, 1989
Page 3 of 4
Lot 5, Block 2. Primary and alternate sites are located
about a third of the way back into the lot off the road,
just above the woods. While additional sites probably could
be located in the woods, the sites leave a relatively small
building envelope near the road. Again, the sites need to
be snow fenced to keep construction traffic off of them.
Both sites require mounds.
Lot 6, Block 2. Primary and alternate sites, both being
mound systems , are located near the north end of the
property near the road. Again, topographic contours vary
slightly from those shown on the survey. Slopes range from
3-6$. These sites force the house location to be more
centrally located on the property. The sites need to be
snow fenced to avoid traffic during road construction.
_.._ .._._._._..�_...__
Lot 7, Block 2. Both primary and alternate drainfield sites �
� are located near the north end of this lot. Both sites
� require mound systems. The sites allow for great
f,�exibility in house location. '
.
__�__
... _
Lot 1 , Block 3. Primary and alternate drainfield sites,
both being mound systems, have been located on the property.
House location would be relatively near the cul-de-sac. The
primary site somewhat limits the potential house locations.
Lot 2, Block 3. Primary and alternate drainfield sites,
both being mounds, are located near the westerly corner of
this property. These sites definitely need to be fenced off
'during road construction, since they are in a prime "short-
cut". area.
Lot 3, Block 3. Both primary and alternate sites are
located at the extreme east end of the property, leaving
great flexibility in house placement. These sites are not
likely to be disturbed during construction of roadways. .
Lot 4, Block 3. The two drainfield sites are centrally
located on the property, having some significant effect on
house placement. The site evaluator anticipated the
existing house would be removed, with a newer house placed
to the northeast corner of the lot. House placement will
have to take into account the drainfield sites. Both sites
require a mound.
, . , - .
Preliminary Plat of Fox Bend - Septic System Testing
August 22, 1989
Page 4 of 4
General Co�ments -
Each proposed lot appears to have suitable primary and
alternate drainfield sites. On some lots, the primary and
alternate sites shown are the onl possible sites available. On
other lots, it is likely that additional testing could find a
number of potential sites, allowing additional flexibility in
house placement.
In each case, drainfield sites have been designed to meet
the minimum 20' setback from property lines, and 75' setbacks
from designated wetlands. �
On the majority of lots, eatreme cantion must be taken
during construction of improvements to the property. Road
construction will take p lace within 50' of tested drainf ield
sites on at least 6 of 17 lots, and on 2 Iots the sites are
relatively near the area proposed to be graded to provide a
detention basin. I would recommend that each lot have drainfield
sites protected by snow fence totally surrounding the drainfield
sites at a distance 20' from the boundaries of each drainfield
system. Additionally, when road construction plans are
submitted, I would like to review them to determine where road
cut would have a potential impact on drainfield sites.
Summary -
Out of 34 drainfield sites tested, 29 require mound systems
and 5 would allow a trench-type system. Each lot has primary and
alternate sites designated. It would not be surprising if as
many as 20� of the sites ultimately will have to be re-tested due
to the buyer's preference for house sites near or conflicting
with drainfields. Some lots are extremely limited for potential
drainfield sites, others provide a degree of f lexibility in house
placement.
Given the above facts, concerns, and constraints, I would I
recommend approval of the subdivision as proposed. Accompanying
this memo is a topographic survey of the preliminary plat showing
potential house locations and locations of both primary and
alternate drainfield sites.