The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutseptic info �_ � • ! • �� r � To: Orono residents on mound type septic systems From: Wtliie Gibbs, ISTS Manager Date: May 10,2006 Re: Landscaping Do's and Don'ts for Mound Systems, Quick Reminder Do plant and maintain a full cover of grass and keep mowed to a normal height, this grass cover aids in the evaporation of large amounts of effluent(the liquid left after the "other" stuff has been removed) in the summer time and ailows the mound system to help breakdown nitrogen in the effluent, Do water the grass over the mound in extreme dry conditions,sparingly. Do avoid unnecessary foot traffic over the mound,mow it and stay off of it. This is especially true in the winter time. Even human foot traffic can cause #rost to penetrate the mound resutting in potential freezing problems. Do inspect your mound sy5tem annually for winter kill, (reseed if necessary) animal damage, (burrowing)or signs of potential failure. Do not plant trees or shrubs on the mound system, smaller trees and shrubs may be planted at the edges. Remember,that sunshine is the key to a healthy mound system. Do ask questions, if you have any cancerns or questions conceming your mound system please feel free to call me,I can be reached at 952-249-4626. 1 � � 0 ! � � O O CI'TY OF ORONO Municipal Offices � �, 3treet Address Mailiag Address: �� G�' 2750 Kelley Pazkway P.O.Box 66 �i Orono,MN 55356 Crystal Bay,MN 55323-0066 �ESH�4 To: The Current Owner of Address 575 SUSSEX CIR City Ordinance requires that onsite sewage treatment systems in Orono be inspected on a periodic basis. The onsite sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and the following is known about the system. A sketch of the known components of the system is available for most properties at the Orono City Hall. Imminent Public Health Threat Yes �No If yes, please contact the Onsite Systems Manager at 954-249-4626 within 10 days of receipt of this.nQti��. -�'he sEptic system must be brought into compliance within 90 days. Failure to do so will result in referral to the City Attorney for legal_actiQn�.__ .__ . - System Identified as No -Compli�u�._..__ ___ .--_._-_-------- �- - - - -- "Yes___ __._._..__ __._._ No _. If y_eas,_syste�-m�st�be-�augi�tintu��o`mpliance��y:. ._-- __.__..._._ - _ _. _ December 31, 2007 - �•�-- _ ---�-------�--�--�— __.._--_ .__.�w_Dec�n[tr��'3T,-Z0�6�r_ .- Other _.___.._.______—_ -_ Septic,Tank�s) P��qpr�t.Aleeded--—--__..._----_.�.__,____..._._._ . Yes � __...__.__.. _ .,_._.1�Ia--_----_.___. ---__._...._.__.._ ._._ _.._..__ __.._._____ .. The-e��-i��ecrnritn�ds��ie sepfic tank(s) and/or lift tank be serviced and Qumped out every three (3) years. City records indicate th�xauk�s,��cer.e.k��tt�ped-�orat-art "` or� - �� '1 � The"tarik�s�iould be cleaned through the manhole and not through the inspection pipes, this allows.forpropex�leaning�- —_---_----.---__._... _.__..__._ _ _ . Comments: _ _ _____..., ___..�- _.__... ._._. . _ _ _ _ � Inspector� ��'�/��""�' `�-'<��/`� Date of Inspection: 7 �� Telephone (952) 249-4600 • Fax(952) Z49-4616 aww.ci.oroao.mn.us � °� o : o ��a��:�,-- : �, CITY of ORONO �� ;�+,. , � �. � 4 Municipal Offices k � _ � `\\ `�.�r,�, : '..^ . � �,� �� `-�I��`,�G Street Address: asa-a4q-y6o � Mailing Address: \.,`9 ��* �' 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Boz 66 �EgI�O Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 To Current Owner: Address: S �75 �c...� S'S�=Y C��C� � City Ordinance 199 requires that each existing on-site sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected every two years. The on-site sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the categories checked below. SYSTEM CONFORMIT'Y (1-3): ) 1 "CODE SYST'EM"An tST5 which meets all the location,design and construction standards of the current Orono Municipal Code. 2 "COMPLIANT SYSTEM" An ISTS which does not meet all the location,design and construction standards of the current Orono Municipal Code but does meet the three foot sepazation requirement or two foot requirement for systems installed 1996 or eazlier,and which is not failing or an immiinent threat to public health or safety. 3 "NON-COMPLIANT SYST'EM" A prohibited ISTS;an ISTS located within a designated 100-year flood plain,any ISTS which may or may not meet all the location,design,or conshvction stan�rds of the current Orono Municipal Code and which is failing for any reason;and any ISTS with less than three feet of unsaturated soil or sand between the distnbution device and the limiting soil characteristics. TANI�CONDITION(5-7): � Tank inspection indicates: 5 Pumpout not needed at this time. - 6 Septic tanks must be pumped out this year (city code recommends tanks to be pumped out once every 3 yeazs. Tank was last pumped „� -"� - � � ). _.._. _ _ _ Make sure seutic tanks are pumped throueh manhole and not throuQh white inspection aipes. This allows for the proper cleanine. Keep water softner and iron filter discharse out of seatic svstem to prolong life of drainfield. Ask aumper to test alarm float to verifv alarm is stili workine in vour house. The alarm warns owner that seata¢e is about to backup into basement. 7 Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. Inspection risers(4"dia.pipe)must be installed in each tank. If tanks have not been pumped out within the last three years,they should be pumped out now. DRAINFIELD CONDITTON(8-101: C� - . . - 8 Drainfield is dry,no surfacing evident. , _.._ , ' " ' 9 Some evidence of surfacing,not critical yet. 10 Drai�eld is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact the City Inspector immediately.Repairs must be completed within 90 days. COMMENTS: � f , � .�� r . � � Date of Inspection Septic System Inspector Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a mortgage or other transfer of property,be advised that this report does not guazantee or certify that an existing system will continue to function properly, but is merely an opinion of the adequacy of the system under current �°� � . o �:� o ��:��_;M, CITY of ORONO ,� ��, � .`� �ti M��i� ot�� f��"�'{;�`i��`' . � �•;��f��,.: ,�yG Strest Address: MailinQ Address. 9$E+gg04' 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323•0066 To Current Owner: Address: �7 � s�SStX C;rc.1� Ciry Ordinance 199 requires that each existing on-site sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected every two yeazs. The on-site sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appeazs to fall into the categories checked below. ST'EM CONFORMITY 1-3 : � 1 'CODE SYST'EM" An ISTS which meets all the locaUon,design and conshuction standards of the current Orono Municipai Code. 2 "COMPLIANT SYSTEM" An ISTS which does not meet all the location,design end construction standards of the curnnt Orono Municipal Code but does meet the three foot seperation requirement or two foot requirement for systems installed 1996 or earlier,and which is not faiting or an imminent threat W public health or safety. 3 "NON-COMPLIANT SYST'EM" A prohibited ISTS;an ISTS located within a designated 100-year flood plain,any ISTS which may or may not meet all the location,design,or conshuction standards of the current Orono Municipal Code and which is failing for any reason;and any ISTS with less than three feet of unsaturated soil or sand between the distribution device and the limiting soil characterisGcs. TANK CONDTI'ION(5-7): � Tank inspection indicates: 5 Pumpout not needed at this time. 6 Septic tanks must be pumped out this ear (city code requires tanks to be pumped out once every 3 years. Tank was last pumped �.7-�� ). Make sure seutic tanks are pumaed throuQh manhole and not through white insuection uipes. This allows for the ' proper cleaning. Keen water softner and iron fitter discharge out of septic system. 7 Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. Inspection risers(4"dia.pipe)must be installed in each tank. If tanks have not been pumped out within the last three years,they should be pumped out now. D INFIELD CONDITION(8-10): � 8 Drainfield is dry,no surfacing evident. 9 Some evidence of surfacing,not critical yet. 10 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact the City Inspector imrnediately.Repairs must be completed within 90 days. COMI��NTS: I'�O,�r.� �0 0�) ��C._� $� Lo r..�1 SC��'�- -�-G� `S�r`ti�(. �00�4 - � Q =� —v� G1�-•� ��--� Date of Inspecdon Matt Bolterman- Septic System Inspcetor Note: In the event that this inspection report is used ro satisfy the requiroments for a mortgage or other trar►sfer of property,be advised that this roport does not guarantee or certify U►at an existing system will continue to function properly,but is merely an opinion of the adequacy of the system under current conditions based on the available information. Telephone(952)249-4600 • Fax(952)249-4616 wavw ri_nrnne_mn_ne �O� O _��, O �``'� � CITY of ORONO ��_;�,-� '�"�'!.�—' .a .jl� i .��. �, "�►� ��:,�,r��'� �,�' Municipa! OfTices � !�;:��,��r . , ,q;,tig<'yG Street Addreu: Mailin�Add�eu: �ES�I� 2750 Keiley Parkway P.O. Bax 66 Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Owner: �o.c�� .�� 5 fi5(J � rj 7� S U �, A1lress._ SS � � �f C,��, Ciri•Ordinance 199 requires that each esisting on-site sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected every rivo years. The on-site se�rage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appeazs to fall into the categories checked belo�v. T'EM CONFORMITY (1-3): � 1 "CODE SYSTEM" An ISTS which meets a11 the location,desir.,n and conskuction standards of the cuaent Orono i�funici al Code. P 2 °CONfPLIANt SYST'EM" An ISTS which does not meet all the locatioq design and construction standardc ofihe cuneat Orono Municipal Code but dors meet the three foot separation requirement,and w,}uch is not failing or an iauninent threat to public health or safety. 3 "NON-CONIPLIANT SYSTEM" A prohibited ISTS;an ISTS Located within a designated 100-year IIood p(ain,any ISTS which may or may not maet all tha location,drsign,or conctruction staadards of the cucrerR Orano�fuaicipal Code and which is failing for any reason;and any ISTS with tess than three feet of unsaturatad soil or sand between the distribution device and the limiting soil charactzristics, r T.�NK CONDITION(5-10): S Tank inspection indicates: � Pumpout not naeded at this time. 6 Tank must ba pumped out this yaar (city code requires tanks to be pumped out every 3 yesrs. Tank was l�st pumped ol"7—�� . 7 Solids accumulation in tlnks is at a critical a critical lavel. Tanks should be pumpad out ag soon av possible. 8 System is dischazging to the surface. Tanks must be pumpad out within 48 hours W eliminate surface discharge. y Inspaction risars missing-tanks could not be icupected Inspection risecs(4"dib pipe)must ba instatled in each tuilc at ne:ct pumpout If tanks tu�•e not been pumped out withirt tht(azt three years,they shculd be pumped out now. 10 Inspaction pipa is locatad directly over tardc ba�le(does not give accurate measuremrnt of solidc accumulation). If tanks have not been pumped out wittsin the(ast three years,thay should be pumped out now. LD CONDITION 11-1� : l� 11 Dr�eld is dry,no surfacing evidrnt _ Some evidence of surfacing,not critical yet 13 Dra�eld is saturstad and visibly d'ucharging uatreated effluent to thz surfice. Contact the City Inspector immediate(y,Rapaus must be compteted within 90 days. 1� Draintiald e:ctent and condition unknowt�. �� co�rrrs: _S-�sfie�. \ o o�C..S o � � ��.,p �-��k �e fi .i�o.(' � � _ , °�-a-0 — o � �M�, . Date of Inspcction • Septie System Inspector ' Note: 1n the evmt that this inspectiun rapeR is u4�d to sa�s�,��yu��for a moRgage or otha traavfa of property,be advised that this repeR does not guarurtae or certify that an e�sting systzsn wi11 continue to function propaly,but is merely an opinioa of the adequacy of the svstem und��„RMr�,,.,a;�;,....�...._.,,._.�._.....:�..,.,_ '-�--•°-- � °� o :, o �� -� CITY of ORONO ,��s � � 1��:�, �► \ �� y�;�� ti Municipal Offices � ��'�:'�, .a � G~ °�� `� Street Address: Mailing Address: �''�"i';``�i-�p � 2150 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 EBII g' Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Owner: Address: 575 Sussex Cir. Permit #'s: 8330 Dates: 9/4/96 Contractors: Clover Hill Co. (This is [�J an existing system [ ] new construction) . STEM COMPLIANCE (1-3) : 1 1 Code System: Meets or exceeds current City standards in all respects relating to design, construction, and location. Appears to be operating properly. 2 Compliant System: Does not meet all current City standards for new construction, but in most respects appears to be designed, located, and constructed in accordance with previous codes and is functioning properly. 3 Non-Compliant System: System may or may not meet current City standards for design, construction, or location, but is failing to properly treat and dispose of the current input; and any system with less than three feet of vertical separation between the bottom of the drainfield and the saturated soil level. (The saturated soil level is [�] or is not [ ] identified under this septic system. If the saturated soil level is not ide{itified, this classification ia subject to revision.) ,�NK CONDITION (5-9) : 5 /5) Pumpout not needed at this time. � Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they should be pumped out this year. 7 System is discharging to the surface. Tanks must be pumped out within 48 hours. 8 Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. If tanks have not been pumped out within three years, they should be pumped out and risers installed now. 9 Inspection pipe is located over tank baffle-can not measure solids accumulation. If tanks have not been pumped out within three years, they should be pumped out now. 10 One or more tanks are cesspools, which means the septic system is non-compliant. (The tanks are L� or are not [ ] water tight or the condition is [ ] unknown. If the tanks are not confirmed to be watertight, this classification is subject to revision.) D INFIELD CONDITION (11-14) : 11 1 Drainfield is dry, no surfacing evident. Some evidence of surfacing, not critical yet. Repair is not required at this time. 13 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact the City Inspector immediately. Repair must be completed within 90 days. 14 Drainfield extent and condition .unknown. POTENTIAL FOR SYSTEM FAILURE: (s_ystem age and condition, soils, etc.) : low CONII�IENTS: �--�-��'� - Date of Inspection Se ic System Inspec or Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a transfer of property, this report does not guarantee that an existing, system will continue to function properly, but indicates the operation of the system under current conditions. Telephone(612)249-4600 • Fax(612)249-4616 4 -�,. y� ,� Tc; Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator gr�: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Late: August 22, 1989 Snbject: Preliminary Plat of Fox Bend - Septic System Testing Septic system site evaluations for this 17-lot subdivision ha�heen submitted. Additionally, a topographical survey of the property containing a plot of the drainfield sites has been submittt�df� I^make the following comments regarding each proposed lot: Lot 1, Block 1. Primary and alternate sites have been 1.ocated. Both t�e sites require a mound system due to high seasonal water tables. Slopes range from 2�-6�. These two sites are about 50' f rom a proposed detention basin, but should not affect nor be affected by that basin. The sites should be totally fenced off with snow fencing before any road or detention basin construction takes place in the subdivision. Lot 2, Block 1. Primary and alternate sites have been located, and both sites have soil and water table conditions to allow for a trench drainfield system. With the proposed house site at the south end of the lot, there should be no problem preserving these sites. Again, the drainfield area shou ld be f enced of f to keep a 11 traf f ic away during road and detention basin construction. Lot 3, Block 1. Again, primary and alternate drainfield �' sites are suitable for trench systems. The two sites are at the rear of the lot. With the most likely house site near the front of the lot, these sites appear to be very suitable. Lot 4, Block l. Primary and alternate drainfield sites are located on the knob at the southwest corner of the property. . Both sites require mound systems. With the house site suited for a walk-out to the northeast, a driveway would likely be centered on the lot east of the drainfield sites. Slopes are in the range of 3$, and not accurately ref lected by the topographic map. It is critical to totally enclose these sites with snow f ence prior to any road construction work, since the sites are very close to _the road. Also, road grades and cuts should be reviewed to verify that the roadwork will not cut into site #2. Lot 5, Block 1. Primary and alternate drainfield sites are located to the rear of the property on slopes of 0-2$. Both sites require a mound system. With the probable house centrally located oR the lot, these sites appear very suitable. � . ti s Preliminary Plat of Fox Bend - Septic System Testing August 22, 1989 Page 2 of 4 Lot 6, Block 1. The drainfield sites are near the rear property line, and not likely to be affected by construction traffic. These sites are located about 70' back from the travelled portion of Luce Line Trail , and should have no affect nor be affected by the trail. Slopes are virtually flat. Again, the likely house location would be in the center of the lot. Depending on final house location, additional sites might be located on this property. Lot 1, Block 2. Primary and alternate drainfield sites have been located at the north end of the lot, adjacent to the proposed road connection to Leaf Street. These sites both require mound systems, and this is perhaps the most critical lot of this subdivision since drainfield sites are uphill from the proposed house location and surrounded on two sides by proposed road construction. These sites must be surrounded by snow fence to avoid any construction traffic. The building envel.ope is large enough that a house can be constructed leaving approximately 50-60' or more setback from the drainfield sites. I would further recommend that no driveways or other grading be constructed within 30' of the toe of the mound sites. Again, the contour lines shown on the topographic survey do not quite jive with elevations f ound in the f ield. . _.. _. _:._ ... _ ,..__ ._ . ._. _ ...._._. _........�_._. . . _ .,..�..�.__,.�� Lot 2, Block 2. Primary and alternate drainfield sites are��` located at the southeast corner of the property near Fox Street. The house site would be located north of the pond area. The two drainfield sites tested must be preserved, ' since they are the only two available sites on the property, both requiring mounds. From a technical standpoint, location of drainfield systems as much as 300-350' away from � the house should not cause any problems. '° ._, �._..._ ._ ,..._.�..� ,. .,� _, .._.... Lot 3, Block 2. Both primary and alternate drainfield sites were located on the property. The primary site would be . suitable for a trench-type system. The alternate site would require a mound. Both sites are located in the wooded area of the lot. Lot 4, Bl.ock 2. Both primary and alternate drainfield sites have been located. Those sites are generally parallel with the proposed road and near the north lot line. These sites definitely need to be snow fenced totally in order to preserve them during road construction. , �� . Preliminary Plat of Fox Bend - Septic System Testing August 22, 1989 Page 3 of 4 Lot 5, Block 2. Primary and alternate sites are located about a third of the way back into the lot off the road, just above the woods. While additional sites probably could be located in the woods, the sites leave a relatively small building envelope near the road. Again, the sites need to be snow fenced to keep construction traffic off of them. Both sites require mounds. Lot 6, Block 2. Primary and alternate sites, both being mound systems, are located near the north end of the property near the road. Again, topographic contours vary slightly from those shown on the survey. Slopes range from 3-6�. These sites force the house I.ocation to be more centrally located on the property. The sites need to be snow fenced to avoid traffic during road construction. Lot 7, Block 2. Both primary and alternate drainfield sites are located near the north end of this lot. Both sites require mound systems. The sites allow for great flexibility in house location. Lot 1, Block 3. Primary and alternate drainfield sites, both being mound systems, have been located on the property. House location would be relatively near the cul-de-sac. The primary site somewhat limits the potential house locations. Lot 2, Block 3. Primary and alternate drainfield sites, both being mounds, are located near the westerly corner of this property. These sites definitely need to be fenced off '�during road construction, since they are in a prime "short- cut". area. Lot 3, Block 3. Both primary and alternate sites are located at the extreme east end of the property, leaving great f lexibility in house placement. These sites are not likely to be disturbed during construction of roadways. - Lot 4, Block 3. The two drainfield sites are centrally located on the property, having some significant effect on house placement. The site evaluator anticipated the existing house would be removed, with a newer house placed to the northeast corner of the lot. House placement will have to take into account the drainfield sites. Both sites require a mound. � � . Preliminary Plat of Fox Bend - Septic System Testing August 22, 1989 Page 4 of 4 General Co�ents - Each proposed lot appears to have suitable primary and alternate drainfield sites. On some lots, the primary and alternate sites shown are the onl possible sites available. On other lots, it is likely that additional testing could find a number of potential sites, allowing additional flexibility in house placement. In each case, drainfield sites have been designed to meet the minimum 20' setback from property lines, and 75' setbacks from designated wetlands. On the majority of lots, eatreme cantion must be taken during construction of improvements to the property. Road construction will take place within 50' of tested drainf ield sites on at least 6 of 17 lots, and on 2 lots the sites are relatively near the area proposed to be graded to provide a detention basin. I would recommend that each Iot have drainfield sites protected by snow fence totally surrounding the drainfield sites at a distance 20' from the boundaries of each drainfield system. Additionally, when road construction plans are submitted, I would like to review them to determine where road cut would have a potential impact on drainfield sites. Stuomary - Out of 34 drainfield sites tested, 29 require mound systems and 5 would allow a trench-type system. Each lot has primary and alternate sites designated. It would not be surprising if as many as 20� of the sites ultimately wil 1 have to be re-tested due to the buyer's preference for house sites near or conflicting with drainfields. Some lots are extremely limited for potential drainfield sites, others provide a degree of f lexibility in house placement. Given the above facts, concerns, and constraints, I would � recommend approval of the subdivision as proposed. Accompanying this memo is a topographic survey of the preliminary plat showing potential house locations and locations of both primary and alternate drainfield sites. � °� o ,, , o �� CITY of ORONO � 'a'��'r� � � �. �''�`�y 'y� �� l� MuniCipal Offices `�+�� ,,�:X�,w G,�, ��'" ' �� Street Addross: MaiNn Addross: '� �`��T� .g,'� B ''�EggO 2150 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323•0066 Owner• ` �� Address:575 3ussex Cir. Permit #'s:8330 Dates:9/4/96 Contractors:Clover Hill Co. (This is [ I an existing system � new construction) YSTEM COMPLIANCE 1-3 : 1 Code Svstem: Meets or exceeds current City standards in all respects relating to design, construction, and location. Appears to be operating properly. 2 Compliant Svstem: Does not meet all current City standards for new construction, but in most respects appears to be designed, located, and constructed in accordance with previous codes and is functioning properly. 3 Non-Compliant Svstem: System may or may not meet current City standards for design, construction, or location, but is failing to properly treat and dispose of the current input; and any system with less than three feet of vertical separation between the bottom of the drainfield and the saturated soil level. (The saturated soil level � has or [ ] has not been identified at this time. If the saturated soil level has not been identified, this classification is subject to revision.) K CONDITION 5-9 : 5 ` Pumpout not needed at this time 6 Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they should be pumped out this year. 7 System is discharging to the surface. Tanks must be pumped out within 48 hours. 8 inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. If tanks have not been pumped out within three years, they should be pumped out and risers installed now. 9 Inspection pipe is located over tank baffle-can not measure solids accumulation. If tanks have not been pumped out within three years, they should be pumped out now. (During the last septic tank Maintenance Pumpout the tanka j�l� were or [ ] were not confirmed to be watertight by the licensed pumping contractor. If the tanks were not confirmed to be watertight, this classification is aubject to revision.) INFIELD CONDITION 11-14 : 11 1 Drainfield is dry, no surfacing evident. 12 Some evidence of surfacing, not critical yet. Repair is not required at this time. 13 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact the City Inspector immediately. Repair must be completed within 90 days. 14 Drainfield extent and condition unknown. POTENTIAL FOR SYSTEM FAILURE: (svstem acTe and condition, soils, etc. ) : low CONII�IENTS: ��s� �/ Date of Inspection S tic System Inspector Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a transfer of property, this report does not guarantee that an existing system will continue to function properly, but indicates the operation of the system under current conditions. Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510 G1Q 11 '7 f 1 QQF. 'I 'I • R'I F.'1'7d7F.�'id'71 M.3RTTNFuI i P6F'F A'? �.. .o o� lY.JJ rn.s oic ,arq q4L� i7►4 MLLLLIG7 14ifIIQ'� S-�' TEST.I�VG"r� .r�C. Sta�iin �. SChfrme� -- nnPCA CQrt. No. s27 95�f Katydld Lena NE • 8t. Mfchae[, MN 55376 - {+9t2) 497-3bB6 April �9 . 1992 Sob Amis =��5 7'iun��r L�r_ orono, aenn. co. . Mn �'Ttil�-`r�tt�r a:s in'�r�guh'rd wit:z tlze' existing Qn-�ite. 5awa.g� Trec�tment ' Systom Iocrxt�d an th�s pro�@.rty- A Site avo.lue,tion at ttzes axi�eia� cy�tsm indica��s �hat ttie �Qtto�+ a� the trenche� are Zmas �r�an 3 ' :4 ttsR rr.ottled soii (seaaa:xai�y high wa�t�� table) and Is riot � cdntorming syste�a�. Rtidi�3a�tal 8oil Iaveatigat4en conciu3�d that a L'ressuriz�3 r�o+uxia �ynt�m will nssd ta be izstalled_ �� ta t..he location of an �xi�ting well. additiC�:'ial Iand is r►@et��d to t:te wsst at the hiqh po�nta w�st ot tha waZl. Addltional Saix riorin$s & n ��mp1.�t�t 33te Evalcaatiryn � T>ecign .is n�eQ�d to ver':�Ey a ��pt1c loca�t�vn_ The e.xistirig tr�ncha�� ,ar�a dr} i.nd.icatGirlg th� Iine L•rom the tmr��ca ----•-to`""�F�Lrfahea i.�_'PI�q4Ted.- -- _ ___ _�. .. . ..... �� -�� =�y-� - _ S�e-ran S_ Schirmers � 985/ds SEPTIC SYSTEM INFORMATION ` STREET ADDRESS �7S 5��,�( �j�� ,. LOT__� BLOCK _SUBDIVISION �'C�C •l�P1Y,� MONTH AND YEAR TESTING DONE 1, ITEMS ALREADY COMPLETED � � �-a � � � - ,-x � � EED TO COMPLETE BEFORE ISSUING BUILDING PERMIT: ^ �`� � � � � B RINGS � �1 b° �� l . OPERC TESTS � SYSTEM DESIGN � ,�� "0 � �� SITE PLAN��I� O OTHER OCOMMENTS .:w DATE THIS SHEET FILED a �� 9� BY � ti'�'�. SUBDIVISION FILE NO. �• ,�i ;,� �� ,�.�b �'S!6 a/r� .•Aa/ vin•� yafrJ _ 'LL8 �M ..iF.Ol..BB 1�1�— �„_ t�•z�a:•n�w-� �wp s;�~ib .. �r _� � ` �r + �'` I .� �--� � j v ,,.;oE� �._��r � ,�.E / / � I� ��/'�-� ��Sl.�� Tsc_n�} I .� /I � _ — •7 �\� — i -_ AI� /� � `y �-�S c,T/��— .._ � �� `T \ � � ��— • I (� \ ��_�� ' w /-_� �_ � _.- � � ;, . �� — „� __��'`� � O� pc /�� \�°[96� ; _'---�.._ _ j� � n,, o ' �\ ' / •�� O. 9 1ij'j 696� / � ' . r� j/ / � o ��6;„� �r��:,.�k, 1'( % ' �%' / �i��s �'sy6 ;n �J ,,,oe / (� d o �/��, �.� I �� ba �' pc. '"'r � i —--._�— _ -._ � �� 1 � —, r'4 i i \ _ �-^-=.1��,� .'e�, �� 11 ,, `---�. .. ��Ic.\\ � '' �► /-�\ Z�) =en� \ ,�� •snb : . ,-—— �� ' ��t•c�tl•• 1 � �,.K � � ';'�✓ `• _�i ��.._-_ --._�(��` �\ ` � !� s�t_,r� ' -+�R.�,�� .�.�iv�Dr� _.�,`� ' �� ._I1� ` �"{ �:.'.��s�— � �x_ ___ 'n 6Z'b �� x � � _._r '-—-�-— �� pF p % . —�� \� � � . /'/ // � � "--- '— � / � � �,.._i� a� 1' � \ `' � j I ,f f � -�� ` �. � �- �,......- — ; �\ � � � — � I � � � � � ' \ � �" �� ' °�` ' � --Jb"` . -_ . t � � � ��w , �� o� �� \ o► �\aZ ,o —��\ � �_ ��I� � � � � -� � � i � \ \ ''_1\ \�� / \ \� \ �'�'/ / � \ �l � \ � `�\` � � \�`..� � '�l 1 � \� ` �\ o�f ��` � o�p�Dj%'t��\��r-� � 1 � �x� � � }� ,I�Z � � � r ,.-i . � � � � � ; 11 � � — � \ i � 1 I � � o�. �� i� �`��` � I x °s� � � I ��' ` -�°s ; / 1 � � i � � � � i i D- z / � '-J \ \1 ; j;' // /� J � , es z I / // ' oy ,�r� •� � � j i:S� , OS ��IT� U �ct , ��i ` \� �-'�r � :OL 2 � � . � i •�,\..`��-: ^� +"�°;� , y" ~`� / �� ^� � ,/' — �` ' �J t �/ /- / 1 ! K�;�-�'/�' � ; ., �r-f-:� , ; , J n �.L/ ' � `� ` ,!r' ya' � l�� 2' � � • /1 { , G , l f � � \_... �1 Az��. . /�� . , , O