The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutseptic info �o� O O CITY OF ORONO � � Muaicipal Offices r�, �, Street Address Mailiag Addresa: � G'�' 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O.Box 66 '�.9 �i Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 kEsHo�' To: The Current Owner of Address 560 SUSSEX CIR City Ordinance requires that onsite sewage treatment systems in Orono be inspected on a periodic basis. The onsite sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and the following is known about the system. A sketch of the known components of the system is available for most properties at the Orono City Hall. Imminent Public Healt Threat Yes No If yes, please contact the Onsite Systems Manager at 954-249-4626 within 10 days of receipt of ` this notice. The septic system must be brought into compliance within 90 days. Failure to do so will result in referral to the City Attorney for legal action. System Identified as Non- ompliant Yes No If yes, system must be brought into compliance by: December 31, 2007 December 31, 2010 Other Septic Tank(s) Pump o Needed Yes No The city recommends the septic tank(s) and/or lift tank be serviced and pumped out every three (3) years. City records indicate the tank(s)were last pumped out on �n '�3�O�� The tank(s) should be cleaned through the manhole and not through the inspection pipes, this allows for proper cleaning. Comments: � ��` , �,,�:�u2 :�c� Ins e� c�r: D �� 7 p ate of Inspection: Telephone (952j 249-4600 • Fax(952� 249-4616 www.ci.orono.ma.us � °� o :. o ��-�' CITY of ORONO � 'r��r`�;�- �„ ��3��¢c' � – ��C, Municipal Offices '�\�� `��r,,��,5��YV.�,.1!�' `.�. _ \� " ��} �+��,��` G Street Address: q 5a-a4 q �60 o Mailing Address• ��`�1�Eg�Kpfi��'/ 2150 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 �— Orano, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323•0066 To Current Owner: Address: �� s 5�J S SC' �C C��=' �� City Ordinance 199 requires that each existing on-site sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected every two yeazs. The on-site sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the categories checked below. SYSTEM CONFORMIT'Y (1-31: � 1 "CODE SYSTEM"An LSTS whicb meets all the location,design and construcrion standards of the cu►rent Orono Municipal Code. 2 "COMPLIANT SYSTEM" An ISTS which does not meet all the location,design and construction standards of the current Orono Municipal Code but does meet the three foot separadon requirement or two foot requirement for systems installed 1996 or earlier,and which is not failing or an i�inent threat to public health or safety. � 3 "NON-COMPLIANT SYSTEM" A prohibited ISTS;an ISTS located within a designated 100-year flood plain,any ISTS which may or may not meet all the location,design,or construction standirds of the current Orono Municipal Code and which is failing for any reason;and any ISTS with less than thrce feet of unsaturated soil or sand between the distribution ckvice and the limiting soil characteristics. TANK CONDITION(5-71: � Tank inspection indicates: 5 Pumpout not needed at this time. 6 Septic tanks must be pumped out this year (city code recommends tanks to be pumped out once every 3 years. Tank was last pumped / [�— 3/�-�� )• Make sure seatir tanks are aumaed throush manhole and not throush white inspection aiaes. This allows for the arooer cleanins. Keep water softner and iron filter discharee out of seatic svstem to prolons life of drainfield. Ask pumaer to test alarm float to verifv alarm is still workin�in vour house. The alarm warns owner that septage is about to backup into basement. 7 Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. Inspection risers(4"dia.pipe)must be installed in each tank. If tanks have not been pumped out within the last three years,they should be pumped out now. DRAINFIELD CONDITION(8-101: � 8 Drainfield is dry,no surfacing evident, 9 Some evidence of surfacing,not critical yet. 10 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact the City Inspector immediately.Repairs must be completed within 90 days. COMMENTS: �o �-� � 'U' J ��(,��C.�,= ��r,�� " Mnh..�. Date of Inspection Septic System Inspector Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a mortgage or other transfer of properry,be advised that this report does not guazantee or certify thaU an existing system will continue to funclion properly, but is merely an opinion of the adequacy of fhe system under current �°� � o:��:�::�� . o ,r�:��:_;� � C ITY of ORONO . �',, �� = �!� MunicipalOffices � '��'�. ! "� � c, . , ,t '��',�,.A;�,� .� Street Address. Mailing Addross: '91C�K04' � 2150 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55313-0066 To Current Owner: Address: ��v '��$s�X (;rc.1 r, City Ordinance 199 requires that each existing on-site sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected every two yeazs. The on-site sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the categories checked below. CSTEM CONFORNIITY 1-3 : � 1 "CODE SYSTEM"An ISTS which meets all the location,design and construction standards of the current Orono Municipal Code. 2 "COMPLIANT SYSTEM" An ISTS which does not meet all the location,design and conshvction standards of the current Orono Municipal Code but does meot the three foot separation roquirement or two foot requirement for systems installed 1996 or earlier,and which is not failing or an imminent threat ta public health or safety. 3 "NON-COMPLTANT SYSTEM" A prohibited ISTS;an ISTS located within a designated 100-year flood plain,any ISTS which may or may not meet all the location,design,or construction standards of the current Orono Municipal Code and which is failing for any reason;and ` eny ISTS with less than three feet of unsaturated soil or sand between the distribution device and the limiting soil characteristics. TANK CONDITION(5-71: b Tank inspection indicates: 5 Pumpout not needed at this time. �Septic tanks must be pumped out this year (city code requires tanks to be pumped out once every 3 years, Tank was last pumped \0'�1-0\ ). Make sure septic tanks are uumped throuQh manhole and not through white insnectioa Qipes. This allows for the proper cleanin¢. Keep water softner and iron filter dischar¢e out of septic svstem. 7 Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. Inspection risers(4"dia.pipe)must be installed in each tank. If tanks have not been pumped out within the last three yeazs,they should be pumped out now. DRAINFIELD CONDITION 8-10 : � 8 Drainfield is dry,no surfacing evident. 9 Some evidence of surfacing,not critical yet. 10 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact the City Inspector unmediately.Repairs must be completed within 90 days. co�rrrs: n��:�� :�`3 � oakS ok.� Q ��-p St� �� .icS S �r-t�-C{' �-06'1 . � f� �� '�� \�Y`�-� Y\�'� Date of Inspection Matt Bolterman - Septic System Insp�ctor Note:In the event thatthis inspecdon report is used W satisfy the requirements for a mortgage or other transfer of properly,be advised that this report does not guarantee or certify that anexisting system will continuo to function propedy,but is menly en opinion of the adequacy of the system under curnnt conditions based on the available information. Telephone(952)249-4600 • Fax(952)249-4616 avaom ni n�nwn tnn n� � �� . O�:,, O �=��a�� CITYof ORONO �`-�.�-.�' � •�'► ;��`'s� �� '�'. y��;�.�;�� ,y,ti Municipal O�ces ,� �.r, •�,�j��r G � �� '� `,3 i r`tg,'�i Street Address: Mailin�Address: EgII� 2150 Kelley Parfcway P.O. Box 66 Orono, MN 55356 Crystai Bay, MN 55323-0066 �\ Owner: J�cre� W�,�' r�,o�S Address:— �6(� S�SS 2 K �.;r C�Q Cin•Ordinance 199 requires that each existing on-site sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected every tcvo yeazs. The on-site se�vage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appeazs to fall into the categories checked below. STENI CONFORMITY 1-3 : 1 1 "CODE SYSTEM" An ISTS which meets a11 ihe tocation,design and coastruction standards of the current Orono Municipal Code. 2 "CONfPLIANT SYSTEM" An LSTS which does not meet all the locatioq daign and cons4uction staadards of the cun ant prono Municipal Code but doas meet the three foot separation requiremrnt,and which u not failing or an imminrnt threai to public health or safety. 3 "NON-CONIPLIANT SYSTEM" a pmhibited ISTS;an ISTS Located within a designated 100-year Aood plain,any ISTS which may or may not meet all thz location,design,or cocutruction staadards of the currart prono�funicipal Code and which is failing for any rqason;and aay ISTS with less than three feet of unsatucated soil or sand between the distn'bution device aztd tha limiting soil characteristics. T�'�1K CONDITION(5-10): � Tank inspection indicates: � Pumpout not needed at this time. Tank must be pumped out this year (city code requires tanics to be pumped out every 3 yeazs. Tank waz last pumped �� , 7 Solids accumulation in tanks is at a ezitical a critica!level. Tanks should lx pumped out as soon as passibla. 8 System is discharging to tha surface. Tarilcs must be pumped out within 48 houts to eliminata surface discharge. � Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be uupectad Inspaction risers(4"dia pipe)must be installed in each tantc at next pumpout If tanks ha�•e nut baan pumpad out within the last three years,thay s(iould be pumped out now. 10 Inspaction pipe is located diracdy over tank ba.�le(dors not give accucate measurement of solids accumulation). If 4inks have not been pumped out within tha last three yeus,thay should be pumped out now. TELD CONDITION(11-1�): 1,� 11 Drainfield is dry,no surfacing evidant _ Soma evidence of surfacing,not critical yet 13 Drainfield is saNratzd and visibly discharging untreated e�luent to the surfice. Contact the Ciry lnspector irnmediately.Repairs must be comQlated within 90 days. 1� Drainfield e:ctant and condition unknowtL COI�NTS: S S�c.,., �o a S L - � � � . �-1.0 -0 \ ��C . Date of Inspcction • S tic S ' ep ystem Inspector Note: In tlu evrnt that this itsspection repoR is used to satisfy the nqnirements for a moR3age or otha�ansfer of property,be advised that Uus repoR doa not guaruitae or certify tlwt an a�dsting system will continue to function propatly,but is maely an opinioa of the adequacy of the system undet cucrent conditioru based on the availabla .�F....�f�.... � °� O,;�, O ,�.;�-� ,� CITY of ORONO �'�+� � '�� -� �r Municipal Offices 'C� � �� .t � ,,��.�� SVeet Address: Mailing Address: '�ygHO . 2150 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323•0066 � Owner: VV ) l�� Address: 560 Sussex Cir. Permit #'s: 6115 Dates: 5/26/94 Contractors: AAA Pollution Control (This is [� an existing system [ ] new construction) . STEM COMPLIANCE (1-3) : 1 1 Code System: Meets or exceeds current City standards in all respects relating to design, construction, and location. Appears to be operating properly. 2 Compliant System: Does not meet all current City standards for new construction, but in most respects appears to be designed, located, and constructed in accordance with previous codes and is functioning properly. 3 Non-Compliant System: System may or may not meet current City standards for design, construction, or location, but is failing to properly treat and dispose of the current input; and any system with less than three feet of vertical separation between the bottom of the drainfield and the saturated soil level. (The saturated soil level is [�j, or is not [ J identified under this septic system. If the saturated soil level is not identified, this classification is subject to revision.) TANK CONDITION (5-9) : 8 ' 5 Pumpout not needed at this time. 6 Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they should be pumped out this year. System is discharging to the surface. Tanks must be pumped out within 48 hours. 8 Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. If tanks have not been pumped out within three years, they should be pumped out and risers installed now. 9 Inspection pipe is located over tank baffle-can not measure solids accumulation. If tanks have not been pumped out within three years, they should be pumped out now. 10 One or more tanks are cesspools, which means the septic system is non-compliant. (The tanks are [ ] or are not [ ] water tight or the condition is [� unknown. If the tanks are not confirmed to be watertight, this classification is subject to revision.) INFIELD CONDITION (11-14) : 11 1 Drainfield is dry, no surfacing evident. 12 Some evidence of surfacing, not critical yet. Repair is not required at this time. 13 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact the City Inspector immediately. Repair must be completed within 90 days. 14 Drainfield extent and condition unknown. POTENTIAL FOR SYSTEM FAILURE: (system age and condition, soils, etc. ) : low COMMENTS: �-�g q�' Date of Inspection ep i System Insp ctor Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a transfer of property, this report does not guarantee that an existing system will continue to function properly, but indicates the operation of the system under current conditions. Telephone(612)249-4600 • Fau(612)249-4616 CITY OF ORONO � O� Municipal Offices O O Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 a � ON—SITE SEWA(�E TREATMSNT � �ti. INSPECTION REPORT ��9kESH.O�'�G Owner:��2� !�i//1�� Address: � � Permit �'s: Dates: �a�6—/`f` Contractors: 1 City ordinance number 100 requires that each on-site sewage treatment .system in Orono be inspected on a regular basis. The on-site sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the category checked below. (This is f� an existing system [ ) new construction) S1'STEM CONFORMITY (1-3): 1 "CODE SYSTEM��-A system which meets all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City Codes, and which is operating satisfactorily by treating and disposing of the entire current sewage input without discharging any pollutants into ground or surface waters. 2 "CONFORMING SYSTEM"•A system which does not meet all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City Codes, but was installed according to the code in effect at the time of installation, and which is operating satisfactorily by treating and disposing of the entire current sewage input without discharging any pollutants into ground or surface waters. 3 "NON-CONFORMING SYSTEM"-A prohibited system; a system located within a designated 100-year floodplain; any system which may or may not meet all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City Codes and which is failing for any reason; and any system with less than 3 feet of unsaturated soil or sand between the distribution device and the limiting soil characteristics. (The limiting soil characteristic �has or [ ] has not been identified at this time. If the limiting soil characteristic has not been identi i , this classification may be subject to revision.) TANK CONDITION (5-10): Tpn� inspection indicates: (5� Puir�pout not needed at th i s t i me. ''S Solids accunulation in tanks indicates they should be punped out this year to help prevent future problems. 7 Solids accumulation in tanks is at a critical level. tanks should be punped out as soon as possible. 8 System is discharging to the surface. Tanks must be pumped out within 48 hours to eliminate surface dischar�e. 9 Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. lnspection rise�s (4" dia. pipe) �st be installed in each tank at next pumpout. If tanks have not been pumped out within the last three years, they should be punped out now. 10 Inspection pipe is located directly over tank baffle (does not give accurate measurement of solids accunulation>. If tanks have not been punped out within the last three years, they should be punped out now. DRAINFIELD CONDITION (11-14): D nfield inspection indicates: 1 Drainfie[d is dry, no surfacing evident. 2 Same evidence of surfacing, not critical yet. 13 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact the City Inspector immediately. Repairs must be completed within 90 days. 14 Drainfield extent and condition unknown. LIMITING S1TE FACTORS (slooe,setbacks,etc.): POTENTIAL FOR SYSTEM FAILURE (decends on soils,water table,etc.): �� ) A COMMENTS: Date of nspection S ptic System Inspector Note: ln the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a mortgage or other transfer of property, be advised that this report does not guarantee or certify that an existing system will continue to function properlyi but is merely an opinion of the adequacy of the system under current conditions based on the available information. This report must be kept on the pr�cnises with the system locstion and puy�ing records. WHITE COPY/Inspectors File YELLOW COPY/Homeowner CITY OF ORONO �O� Municipal Offices O O Post Office Box 66 Crystel eay, MN 55323-0066 � � ON—SI'1'E SEWAfiE TREATbIENT INSPECTION REPORT ti h '�'� G 9kE9�Iog'� � Owner• S�M W��W1�S Address• ��0� �IdSS �tr' . ' l�/ Permit �'s: � Dates: ��oc l ""L'4 Contractors: �)� City ordinance nunber 100 requires thet each on-site sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected on a regutar besis. The on-site sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected end appears to fall into the category checked below. (This is [ ] an existing system [ ] new construction) SYSTEM CONFORMITY C1-3): . / f "CODE SYSTEM'�-A system which meets all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City Codes, and which is operating satisfactorily by treating and disposing of the entire current sewage input without discharging any pollutants into gro�d or surface waters. 2 "CONFORMING SYSTEM"-A system which does not meet all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City Codes, but was installed according to the code in effect at the time of installation, and which is operating satisfactorily by treating and disposing of the entire current sewage input without discharging eny pollutants into ground or surface waters. 3 "NON-CONF�tMING SYSTEM"-A prohibited system; a system lxated within a designated 100-year floodplain; any system which mey or may not meet all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City Codes and which is failing for any reason; and any.system with less than 3 feet of unsaturated soil or sand between the distribution device and the limiting soil characteristics. (The limiting soil characteristic [ ] has or [ ] has not been identified at this time. If the limiting soil characteristic has not been identified, this classification may be subject to revision.) TANK CONDITION C5-10): 5 Tp� inspection indicates: ( 5J Pumpout not needed at this time. "S Solids accunulation in tanks indicetes they should be puiped out this year to help prevent future problems. 7 Solids accunulation in tanks is at a critical level. tanks should be punped out as soon as possible. 8 System is discharging to the surface. Tanks must be punped out uithin 48 hours to eliminate surface dischar�e. 9 Inspection risers missing-tenks could not be inspected. Inspection risers <4" dia. pipe) must be installed in each tank at next purtipout. 1f tanks have not been punped out within the last three years, they should be punped out now. 10 Inspection pipe is located directly over tank baffle (does not give accurate measurement of solids accunulation). If tanks have not been punped out within the last three years, they should be pumped out now. DRAINfIELD CONDITION (71-14): L D nfield inspection indicates: Drainfield is dry, no surfacing evident. 2 Same evidence of surfacing, not critical yet. 13 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact the City [nspector immediately. Repeirs must be completed within 90 days. 14 Drainfield extent and condition unknown. LIMITING SITE FACTORS (slooe.setbacks.etc.): POTENTIAL FOR SYSTEM FA[LURE (decends on soils,water table,etc.): COMMENTS: , � s t .. . Date of Inspect on Septic System inspector Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a mortgage or other transfer of property, be advised that this report does not guarantee or certify that an existing system will continue to f�mction properly� but is merely an opinion of the adequacy of the system under current conditions based on the available information. This report must be kept on the premises with the system locstion and Fxmping records. WHITE COPY/Inspectors File YELLOW COPY/Homeowner � . , � � .� SEPTIC SYSTEM INFORMATION , STREET ADDRESS �� .�,�'�,)C l,�I��i LOT `l BLOCK p� SUBDIVISION �QX ,(�/'� MONTH AND YEAR TESTING DONE_�/y �� ITEMS ALREADY COMPLETED 6 f�r s , b �rC�S, J/T� r'lG�1'�� S�-. �r� -�r a y132 horn�- NEED TO COMPLETE BEFORE ISSUING BUILDING PERMTT: OBORINGS i OPERC TESTS SYSTEM DESIGN��J � ,�,C.JI7 SITE PLAN O OTHER OCOMMENTS N�� 1-�- �NC ��R�C'A_sU�l� ��T L��►�� N�''� -S'N�DW t�1 D� ��S� PL.4N S � , i DATE THIS SHEET FILED p� � BY �"e '-.yv �/�'I"� SUBDIVISION FILE NO. .�o 5.�� . �.� P. � � � y To: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator gr�: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator Date: August 22, 1989 Subject: Preliminary Plat of Fox Bend - Septic System Testing Septic system site evaluations for this 17-lot subdivision ha�heen submitted. Additionally, a topographical survey of the property containing a plot of the drainfield sites has been submitt�e�d(� I^make the following comments regarding each proposed lot: Lot 1, Block 1. Primary and alternate sites have been located. Both t�re sites require a mound system due to high seasonal water tables. Slopes range from 2$-6$. These two sites are about 50' f rom a proposed detention basin, but should not affect nor be affected by that basin. The sites should be totally fenced off with snow fencing before any road or detention basin construction takes place in the subdivision. Lot 2, Block 1. Primary and alternate sites have been located, and both sites have soil and water table conditions to allow for a trench drainfield system. With the proposed house site at the south end of the lot, there should be no problem preserving these sites. Again, the drainfield area should be fenced off to keep all traffic away during road and detention basin construction. I,ot 3, Block 1. Again, primary and alternate drainfield � sites are suitable for trench systems. The two sites are at the rear of the lot. With the most likely house site near the front of the lot, these sites appear to be very suitable. Lot 4, Block 1. Primary and alternate drainfield sites are located on the knob at the southwest corner of the property. . Both sites require mound systems. With the house site suited for a walk-out to the northeast, a driveway would likely be centered on the lot east of the drainfield sites. Slopes are in the range of 3$, and not accurately ref lected by the topographic map. It is critical to totally enclose these sites with snow fence prior to any road construction work, since the sites are very close to _the road. Also, road grades and cuts should be reviewed to verify that the roadwork will not cut into site #2. Lot 5, Block 1. Primary and alternate drainfield sites are located to the rear of the property on slopes of 0-2$. Both sites require a mound system. With the probable house �o�catxe� centrally located oA the lot, these sites appear very suitable. Preliminary Plat of Fox Bend - Septic System Testing August 22 , 1989 Page 2 of 4 Lot 6, Block 1. The drainfield sites are near the rear property line, and not likely to be affected by construction traffic. These sites are located about 70' back from the travel led portion of Luce Line Trail , and should have no affect nor be affected by the trail. Slopes are virtually flat. Again, the likely house location would be in the center of the lot. Depending on final house location, additional sites might be located on this property. Lot 1, Block 2. Primary and alternate drainfield sites have been located at the north end of the lot, adjacent to the proposed road connection to Leaf Street. These sites both require mound systems, and this is perhaps the most critical lot of this subdivision since drainfield sites are uphill from the proposed house location and surrounded on two sides by proposed road construction. These sites must be surrounded by snow fence to avoid any construction traffic. The building envelope is large enough that a house can be constructed leaving approximately 50-60' or more setback from the drainfield sites. I would further recommend that no driveways or other grading be constructed within 30' of the toe of the mound sites. Again, the contour lines shown on the topographic survey do not quite jive with elevations found in the field. Lot 2, Block 2. Primary and alternate drainfield sites are located at the southeast corner of the property near Fox Street. The house site would be located north of the pond area. The two drainfield sites tested must be preserved, ' since they are the only two available sites on the property, both requiring mounds. From a technical standpoint, location of drainfield systems as much as 300-350' away from the house should not cause any problems. ;'� Lot 3, Block 2. Both primary and alternate drainfield sites� Q �* were located on the property. The primary site would be , ��Q � suitable for a trench-type system. The alternate site would �,�, �pf ' require a mound. Both sites are located in the wooded area �S �u � of the lot. ) � _ _ _ ._ _.. . _ __ . _ __._.,_ _ _._ . Lot 4, Block 2. Both primary and alternate drainfield sites have been located. Those sites are generally paral leI with the proposed road and near the north lot line. These sites definitely need to be snow fenced totally in order to preserve them during road construction. Preliminary Plat of Fox Bend - Septic System Testing August 22, 1989 Page 3 of 4 Lot 5. Block 2. Primary and alternate sites are located about a third of the way back into the lot off the road, just above the woods. While additional sites probably could be located in the woods, the sites leave a relatively small building envelope near the road. Again, the sites need to be snow fenced to keep construction traffic off of them. Both sites require mounds. Lot 6, Block 2. Primary and alternate sites, both being mound systems, are located near the north end of the property near the road. Again, topographic contours vary slightly from those shown on the survey. Slopes range from 3-6$. These sites force the house location to be more centrally located on the property. The sites need to be snow fenced to avoid traffic during road construction. Lot 7, Block 2. Both primary and alternate drainfield sites are located near the north end of this lot. Both sites require mound systems. The sites allow for great flexibility in house location. Lot 1, Block 3. Primary and alternate drainfield sites, both being mound systems, have been located on the property. . House location would be relatively near the cul-de-sac. The primary site somewhat limits the potential house locations. Lot 2, Block 3. Primary and alternate drainfield sites, both being mounds, are located near the westerly corner of this property. These sites definitely need to be fenced off '�during road construction, since they are in a prime "short- cut". area. Lot 3, Block 3. Both primary and alternate sites are located at the extreme east end of the property, leaving great f lexibility in house placement. These sites are not likely to be disturbed during construction of roadways. . Lot 4, Block 3. The two drainfield sites are centrally located on the property, having some significant effect on house placement. The site evaluator anticipated the existing house would be removed, with a newer house pZaced to the northeast corner of the lot. House placement will have to take into account the drainfield sites. Both sites require a mound. ' Preliminary Plat of Fox Bend - Septic System Testing August 22, 1989 Page 4 of 4 General Co�ents - Each proposed lot appears to have suitable primary and alternate drainfield sites. On some lots, the primary and alternate sites shown are the onl possible sites available. On other lots, it is likely that additional testing could find a number of potential sites, allowing additional f lexibility in house placement. In each case, drainfield sites have been designed to meet the minimum 20' setback from property lines, and 75' setbacks from designated wetlands. � On the majority of lots, eatreme cantion must be taken during construction of improvements to the property. Road construction will take place within 50' of tested drainfield sites on at least 6 of 17 lots, and on 2 lots the sites are relatively near the area proposed to be graded to provide a detention basin. I would recommend that each lot have drainfield sites protected by snow fence totally surrounding the drainfield sites at a distance 20' from the boundaries of each drainfield system. Additionally, when road construction plans are submitted, I would like to review them to determine where road cut would have a potential impact on drainfield sites. Summary - Out of 34 drainfield sites tested, 29 require mound systems and 5 would allow a trench-type system. Each lot has primary and alternate sites designated. It would not be surprising if as many as 20$ of the sites ultimately will have to be re-tested due to the buyer's preference for house sites near or conf I.icting with drainfields. Some lots are extremely limited for potential drainfield sites, others provide a degree of f lexibility in house placement. Given the above facts, concerns, and constraints, I would recommend approval of the subdivision as proposed. Accompanying this memo is a topographic survey of the preliminary plat showing potential house locations and locations of both primary and alternate drainfield sites. \ / / - = ' / ' ! ) / i � . YT$-�� I � ��t � ` r��%i ' � �/�\ � i �N� I \� \ I / �S �� "%� , \ 1 . /-- � � � `�.I �-., S- , / _� ` .��c�j%� % -/ /� � 1.\ � � \ ` \ �O 1 �\/.� � � �. �y��`,��(\/ �� ; /'�C � � � � I � : � � y� . �/ ' � i �' �'�`�� ' � r f�,�y� I � I (+�.,1. I 1 // //� / a I ?,? � �/ f� j �� `,�`, I � ' � 'I ( / � -a // /X � / O �. �� I I ( �� i i 30 __r---- , 30 �' 6 � � I � � ',.c�= � Jy,�. / 3° -- ; 3° �3,►��f / � � �h j` : - � ��,o , i / . ..s/,�.,,� / ,� � . � ,. � � � � � ..,� � '- / � � '� \ ` �k\i � /�� — _L�•�///� � � . �a �� / � — � / �� \�'' `� �� \ l �� j �' �� 30 ti �� ` �� l.,� �f� \ � � ; �"� � \ � � ��-� `' � \ /� � -�-— _-- � �< � "�°� ?Sr��h \ `\\\ � \� ( ' � �.,- � �9,�� \ � \ � I ' � ' t�. ' --� / � 1 � /-----�� . �� / \ '2 \\ � � � � +�'.•�,,, ' ��\ , � � � � � l6 �' \ � ` �' �~ �� —-`'%' SS= `� ° --_ �-'' � � � / ' ti`' \ � - _ --- =----___ � , a . — ' — � \ \ = e �'" ; ` , --� � � \` ��__ ._.._._,. � ��: x �—'� -� �� I P Norw�./: 9 7 0 \ �q��.� r- _"' 7� �-�4�4"t1�\ // �\ \ , _�'` FiNAE/r✓: if.1 \, f o�dty ^.�`� -'- �-1'7 Y� � / � � h.�.E4r �. ._.-�-r ��` ` � �",--�'��Jti �� ` �1 ` 1 ` '�� 9�e.o -———� �, M.^.��o�^f�;� � o�� \ '• �\ � eos y . . � �\ � � �.. �' 1 j� �` , 1\ \ � ` `� � . . 3 � =�_._ �� — � � / � \\ \ �, , . rX �_ �J � 5 � -�._ —___.= ------- --__ � - — i�--� � y�r—,,e , 1 � � ��\ � �� J � t'`�___ , � , � 9•� � � �, /� I ` / * � �p0 t. ��*'.�, / � /j' � ; ��- ��\.�� `��__'—��tf ( '''• N�"iv.toaq� • . / � c / (� 't---�-t-�,-�,�---_ �; . � �� ='-..-- � � 2. /��-- '—'�-—�----_ , � �' �.�-l74� 2 �:� ::� / / ,.-!��' �� p �_�- O � ` �\ �t---� � i • � ': � �' 3� /� /�' �\�� >>o v � i� v� �Iy .� ' �_.� � � / /� -�= �\� (` � � � ` h ` h / '%� /�r �� \ � � � �\J�1 � �.(`.1 e � y �, � ,i''=�- — I S 1'C � �� 1 / %�'� � �\� �� . �. � � . ' \ -� _ — �/ ��' Q . - \ �`\ � , �`-/i ►+ � ��/r� � � �Q / � � / � � I " 9� i a�\ �� `� � , `'� y � l�30"+/ I` `�/ � � 1 � � x� µv=9sv.p,�� \ � � � , � ^ / 3►4- *,rF�J' .:� � � � � � ; c �_ � �` _ � 0�3�" w 877.� r ^ 1 - - - - � C1fs.HJ 'h . .rv:9sS.7o M ----- �{L� /,/`�� , ' � ♦ � .��\"'C�i�- / - _� i _ . f / _ � . \` �� (9'. ,� � � : �� i `� � � � � �y� �_�'�� ,� i �'►��;,,_-, � ..` .� ..ti •' y ��•._.,`/� ,�'� � C=�`'-`'\__I �` �,yf��"• rJ• ` �-� J� �+ ! , �� ` �. 1\ ,`��'..•'_ ••J"� � f r -.�-�' J \ �r � • �!�`l ,', 1�� `'•�'� �! �� I �� } � � .= � ,. _� 'J.t •: �� `i�I, � � ' ,� \�• ; r- ` � l9r•�1 I � ��/ �! f f �, � � ��' ��.�•�� {I � �\�_� �'�, �• • � , � 1 r \ i� f ,.: , t� � �li t� `{ ��, � I � I : i � � _a l �/ � � 3G _—��- �� t�' � / �' J I .y . ' 1 � ��,�. � �/ � 3� �' r �` � �° � '�� / �/ :y:�=`� � � � ; � ri .-� .,� --�' � �� / f _ - �/ � / 1 __ -- �..L —__,r i • �` � `K�1 � �' � -� �--- � :•// �� I�. u�f'ir ��f�d �_ � � / _ � �" �_ � \ �J ~ 1 � ` \ \ `\ 1 �/ . = i � � - - .�r �/ �0 �^, �'1! \ �. ��-`.�.� � � � � � � - - � � ,- � � � � � � ' , � 'h°� ��Sr�l h \ �` \ `. ( � /:: . -� ,�Q \ I ' • \ / `�1 .\ _'� 1'� � � � � -\ � ( � , � �� , '+4.. ; - . - � � J d z,'�. � � J / • �` 1� `-� • �`�� \�\�t� ` __��}�� i S' , \ ' / � � � � \ �� r.J —--- —-- ---—.�V� � � �' `` \ � � hJ 1 - � � � � � � �� _._._.�.`_._-_— ��~ I P Nur�.�.�: y �_0 � -��.--- h` �,.�-r r�-- -— d�j.M�Q�~-_`~- ,� `\ ` �` �`M1 \ F.r�.r Fiw: lt.x �� - i� �' —� ~�� i/-y��'�\ �1 � j` \�, '�"�a�.r.,.�� . 9�e. r l "` -` � ♦ � � NG.. Aa ri.v r„1 _ \��U ' r � \ `\ ` \ `.�\ � P�j• � r � � \ fip.o � .� � � =�:..�--�. __ � l i�l 1� �� \� \ �� ' c K `-�.�:�� _-----_ ��1 �� \�� '.,,��' so \ ' ` \ --- � `�, -��.- 1 -f ``rla� � � _�� - � �' � I j1 {-- - - � \ � \ ,� ��-� �av r ... l /'� r-'� � �" � � �f-� ��+�'�'c'�----- ---—��t� 1�� ' N dl�sU�l7"k/`loa a� ' � / _ � -�• � �i 'F--,1-r{---,�� ` �- / �r• � �� .�-"�,-----�'- -�74� J � <�'` � `� ' �- _ �-`" � � r�- �~ . + � ti � �� L- O ,� � -- r' \ ?7r. , � • • `� J ' � = p '/��.✓'�"_'^'�� ^ .�� U �� 3 /� /i �.`\\'b �<�., v- �� M � � . � -< ' i�"+ �� ao � �.. T C. ..._._ ti . f' -/� �� . � � , -�,a � � ��'7�i � � \` \ � '' 7� ti�� l 1 ` �6 1•� '.�- f �r I,� /�' � o �\� �\\ � _ ��_ ) , , � _ --- � x , , . . I� � � - \ . . 4 i�'7—� �� / �' l � ! � " �r a`\ \\ �� 4: � - � � � � l , � \ �� .n.u.'!Jk'.�� \\ \ � � \� � � .�� .?1J / �'4_��.yf;�1J � � ` `- � � --_ _ .-_ `1 i .�.. A►',- --877.�f4�---- - - ------ -- � �7f�.r� '� _ - - - - - - ,.�:9ss.7o m ��l�( i'K 4.J .��/� /" ��, . r , � �� -� ! � - � ,� �_�� TCP o: Cu�rL F� �'N r�+'c. S/�£ ��F =o:r �T (rl L!� ,— t� _�-� gs- �� . � , - - - . ;' . � . - - - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . � . - � i !rEFP ftG� ��_.c1.. ��J;�;"'=.. - CIF �F T:!x ".F�r,`"F:. i � • `r . f.R�.<S �£FGR tND �tF%'T-.R CCIiSTRUGT/ON . • ' ' _ - � . �� . . ,� . 1 F7' I ?,o' i� F9'' � i � . . . . . _ . . . I I . . . . - . • . . . - - — _� . � � i - . � I • �� 4i.3 f� ( � � • . �l il'��]'F-G_ . ,J-�_�� K I . - / ` �aCY�>-<<10.� -' -':. . . . �i-�>.- ' �� ^';�. — � -�� a.: <;�',ji`' :� � ' . °ll.��;�o_��% _ \\i\ o _ � � . , ; ,72.a � _ - ' �'� �.�C:.;v�--� � i . ; . . • �s Pe'IUtJ!rX! TeSt$ � � _ � -1 � �3� fi � � SCate_ / y0. o_ o: � X$,jil 8Arirqs - � 5::,7 .-'� \ +' ,, L��,� =_ c—!D,.i�y ,o�i � ' � _ cN 3 /�G 2�'cl: M�rk . � ,S,�? � - . . . _ . - .SaOC�^,'IOT�c.L A�-C�l ��--4r�„1 � }''. / sa' r l ; - - . � • / , J J� 1 .o- , � ,�� ;�r"'� 1V�le= �6 sys!c-r► i� la be ccns'r�c+�i io m� h _ . . . AJA�LP�6L'G FO�c- 'T't-�_�"}-C.�nPS I; �,�._ `- ��`- . SGt�T p0�i 4 _ • ' ��l � • �_�D . � �.�+1 �On-r A�i' O _ . . � .•'" ,xY �i� �.�{X . . X�10 / ��12 L�f:1i 1' ' � �� . � I ' .1/.r `" ,%'i j �t.�� ' . _ - a`�- Ch pLzr� 7080 b �Loca2 Ordinaa -, ^ , � . . _ . . . . . . . _ . . a�7.Sy � ' . f .;?+?�', X�,,�c.� � �� . . � - . . . . . . . . . _ . . . _ _ . �S^^��S" �� .� � �=" /� �� - . - � �� • �,. � ;.� I. � ,. � �,�s�� ,� " Check all undergrou.nd utili�i< � � � � we� Q� w000�, H f» �r. 97C.G � . . �� :�:. �^ � ` � - .. � ��RTY pF=W��r-ta�-.i Q:-oF-��.-c� PeoPoS__o -t�F �r�.-�T •..=�� t.�: �� i�� ` � �"�osf•� a� �� Y- o � •�'� �L �� 1-`o``S � L oT' �• �;.T.._ ,,-�_ t' - c �- , 1 —3-.,�'�..L.�a �o y. t3�_o A�rl- ;�� .. ,,_/ ,_,_ , E' - �. rsr+ a':,��o�-swr��u aaa v5�.F't. �'��'1 X ix�o•r � \ � i " . uSF�l'"'r�CYG.�.ita S ��' (..C?1b ��•�. � , � ORQMD -/ENN. Co, ;�� g� � ` \ �, MN. / . �oet�co � �i�� • i' I �*Nx s \ �, S-P TESTl,t., I/`iC_ \ x � ,�g � � *., �•-��.co Ge;;.+rJ 87- � - p�t,S� i ••,orc�.� / �°' Co:e:'7�� ?t(.62-S9 T-35o5 — �s—S— 7�o s � / G