HomeMy WebLinkAboutBldg permit application info : . 1:.�
' SIIPPLEMENTAL SHEET TO BIIILDING PERMIT APPLICATIOAI
' FOR RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION WITHIN
THE PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OF
SUGAR WOODS SIIBDIVISION
In addition to the plans, specifications and information
--._ __ , ._-- -- _._
- --__.. _.
requested in the 0rono Building�Permit�pp�ication pack-et, - e-- -----------
following is required by special resolution of the Orono City
Council of a13. applicants seeking to obtain a building permit
within the Sugar Woods subdivision:
1. Your site plan must designate the Specific Building Setback
Area for your lot.
A) front 50' , rear 50' and side 40' for Lots 1 through
4 , Block 1 ; and
B) front 50 ' , rear 50' and side 30' for aIl other Iots
in Blocks 1 , 2 , 3 and 4.
2. Per Orono resolution #2652, each lot shall be served by a
single driveway/one curb cut at a 20' maximum allowed width.
The driveway width shall be measured para11e1 to the Ioop
road, Sugarwood Drive. The portion of the drive Iocated
within the front/street setback area shall be placed in a
�tr���ht a?��n*nent fro� ths �.00p roac� and shal I not be
ct�r�pd.
3. An inventory of aII hardcover on the Iot must accompany
each application (see worksheet attached, Attachment A).
AI1 hardcover improvements on each Iot shall be within the
building pad defined as tnat portion of the lot that is r��t
within the building setback area (exception: the driveway
Ieading to Sugarwoods Drive Iocated within the front
building setback area, retaining walls and simil.ar Iand-
scaping structures that may be built within the front
building setback area). The hardcover improvements for each
lot shal I not exceed 80� of the area of the building pad for
each �ot. The hardcover areas of each lot shall incl.ude �the
surface area on the ground of each of the follawing
improvements on the Iot (the inventory shall include allowed
improvements within the front/street setback area) :
A) Footprint of each and every structural improvement
on the � lot, including each house, garage, accessory
building, porch and covered walkway;
B) AII wooden decks and boardwalks regardless of the
spacing between the planks on the surface;
C) All driveways and parking areas that are paved or
graveled;
E ) AI1 walkways and patios that are � covered with
asphalt, concrete, paving blocks (regardiess of the
space in between the blocks ) , or covered with gravel ,
rock or woodchips upon an underliner (whether the
underliner is impervious or not ) , but not those
walkways that �are dirt, grass or gravel , rock or
woodehips without an underliner;
f oFZ
F) Each and every landscaped area with an underliner (whether the underliner
is impervious or not), regazdless of whetrher the area is covered with woodchips,
stones, dirt or plants;
G) Any swimming pool or wading pool;
H) Any tennis court covered with concrete, asphalt or clay, but not any tennis
court covered with grass.
4. Lot Coverage. Per Ordinance 80, 2nd Series adopted February 26, 1990, the total
combined footprint areas of all principal and accessory structures shall not exceed 15%
of lot area. The following shall be included in calculation of lot coverage by structures: •
a) all ro'ofed structures which extend more than 6' above grade level;
b) tennis courts, patios, decks and all similar open structures when partially or
fully enclosed by fences, railings or walls which extend more than 6' above
grade level(if any portion of such structure extends more than 6' above grade
level, the entire structure shall count towards lot coverage);
c) pools,including pool basin and associated deck or patio areas,regardless of
whether such pool basin, deck or patio is enclosed with a fence.
5. All lots shall be provided with a functional means or method of backing out. The City
will not approve the backing out of motorized vehicles onto Sugarwood Drive.
6. For all applicants who find they cannot meet the required standards for development
within the Sugar Woods Planned Residential Development,please refer to Attachment
B for special directions.
7. Written confirmation fro� Rebers Construction that the building plans and site plan
have been approved by the Architectural Review Committee for Sugar Woods.
At the time a Certificate of Occupancy is issued for a new dwelling within the subdivision
of Sugar Woods,the City has agreed to execute and deliver to the owner of each lot a partial release
of s„b�;v;c�er's agreement fc�r that lot. L1non the recordation of such nartial release of subdivider's
agreement,the Registrar of Titles is auth�rized and instructed to remove from the Certificate of Title
� for the lot,the memorial of this instrument and the memorial of the partial release of subdivider's
agreement.
Please contact the Building and Zoning Department (473-7357) if you have any questions
concerning the directives listed above.
Yrior to a�site�reparairion tree cutting,lanc� alterations or constru..t:az,the Buildin�
Setback Area must be defined on the site�vith ntastic or wooden snow fencing. This fencing
must remain on the site until a re�resentative of the Orono Building Department nrovides
�vritten confirmation that fencing mav be removed. .
_ � -2 e� �..
� HARDCOVER CALCULATION WORRSHEET Attachment A
Proposed Hardcover -
a. House x = s .f .
length width
x = s .f .
X - s.f.
X = s .f .
x = s . f .
b. Garage x = s. f.
c. Driveway x = s .f.
(include area within front setback area)
X = s .f.
d. Sidewalk x = s .f.
x = s . f.
X = s .f.
e. Patio/ x = s .f.
Deck/Pool/
Pond x = • . s .f .
f. Landscape x = s .f.
areas
underlain x = s . f. .
with pervious or impervious
sheeting/ x = s . f .
fabric . - �
X _ s .f .
g. Other x = s .f . �
x = s . f.
x = s . f .
TOTAL HARDCOVER = s . f.
Lot Area s.f. - Building Setback Area s.f.
= Buiiding Pad Area s .f .
Aliowed Hardcover
Building Pad Area s .f. x 80% = s . f .
' Attachment B
� REVIEW PROCEDURE FOR ALL APPLICANTS ��
UNABLE TO MEET SPECIAL REQIIIREMENTS �
FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPN�NT
WITHIN SUGAR WOODS PLAT
AII owners' or builders' seeking special consideration must
submit a written request to the Zoning Administrator 7 days
before the official Planning Commission meeting for the month
(third Monday of the month) . The City Counci� of Orono has
approved an abbreviated review process for a11 such request
whereby the P �anning Commission shall assume the sole
responsibility for the review and final recommendation regarding
these special requests. Each applicant shall have the right of
appeal before the Council of all decisions of the Planning
Commission. All appeals to the Council shall be placed on the �
Council agendas for the following Monday (fourth Monday of the
month) . .
Applicants may find that the strict enforcement of these
special requirements for residential development to not be
practica3� nor functional when certain site conditions are found
within a building lot. The following site conditions are Iisted
below as examples to assist app3.icants in the preparation of
their speci£ic request: •
l. the shape or limited area of a building envelope;
2. unique or mature trees within a building envelope or
front/street setback area;
3 ., the topography of a building envelope;
4. desire to place house within a building pad so as to
minimize impact on adjacent properties.
AlI special requests shal.3� consist either of one or more of
the following submittals, depending upon the specific site
conditions to be considered:
l. survey/site plan designating structures, pathways,
drives and type of back out improvement; � .
2. inventory of hardcover (be sure to include alI hardcover
within front street/street setback area) ;
3. topographic mapping of property; �
4. location of mature, unique tree specimens;
5. other unique physical characteristics of property that
requires special placement of house/drive on site.
� ,�.L'.''-':y:..�. � �
r�
< �,Fj�l,�.
� �,� �u������������� � c�t� o� oR,oNo
�
�
� hx"�k a�T.�.�l�
� �,M 0�'�p��{�j��
� �,:����-,Fh,��� RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
� .��,��"; NO. 2 917
t F ,..t �; .'
�, .
Yr,��Y '
�i�('_`,�,�r:;'��} I
a a� �w�� <'1
v.,'.,_•,_..^�_„-3t.., .
A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLDTION #2652,
A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPROVING A
PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
RNOWN AS SUGARWOODS
WHEREAS, Resolution #2652 dated Ju�y 10, 1989 and
approved by the City Counci � of the City of Orono (hereinafter
"Council") granted to Rebers Construction Company a condit�onal
use permit pursuant to Municipal Zoning Code Section T0.20 ,
Subdivision 3 (H) for a Planned Residential Deve�opment known as
"Sugarwoods"; and
WHEREAS, Condition #1(F) on page 5 of resolution 2652
reads as fol�ows :
"F. The applicant has created a "no grading"
zone/woodlands protection area within the private open
space ou��o�s (namely Outlots A and B) and the setback
areas defined within each building lot. Within those
areas no future owner wi3.I. be allowed to remove trees
in excess of 2" in diameter at 4 ' above grade. No
grading is a �.Icw�� withir the prct2cte� areas.
However, each residential lot m� include one driveway
uL to 20 ' wide , leading to the loop road. This
driveway m�be g.raded and trees of an size ma be �
removed to build it. The subdivider's agreement should
a�so define the protected areas such as the �setback
area of each lot and the private open space outlots"
(hereinafter "condition") ; and . :._._,_ ,,,�:�,
WHEREAS , the Council has found th�t the strict
enforcement of this condition may have a negative impact on the
future residentia� development of a building Iot or. to be in
conflict with the original goals and interit for the Sugar Woods,
Planned Residential Development. -
Page 1 of 2
,i
, `, �- I
.Yi • � � . �,�,%'�
� �„ �
��-,l�r
. �,R.�;;y� � �, c�t� o� oR,oNo
r
�, ,��� �X�t.r �
� C f7, k �4r �y,j`
� 1 `�x1G �vKi ..y�+.::
2 �f��;}a�"�x� �
;,�T����F�°��,i, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
� ��,
� �� �� 2917
� �x;���F� a;;�� NO.
Y���',�.>- ';I
��.� ,,7 �(� �.� :�
�.,`_._,..._._.�
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of
Orono shall consider requests of a property owner or owner's �
agent •to waive or vary condition of approval as set forth above
for the Sugar Woods PRD and directs the Orono staff to present �
such written request before the Planning Commission at their
earliest upcoming meeting (third Monday of the month) , and �
further approves an abbreviated review process wh.ereby the
Planning Commission shall assume the sole responsibility of the
review and final recommendation regarding these requests with the
owner or owner's agent having the right of appeal before the �
Council of aYl decisions of the Planning Commission. All appeals
to the Council sha11 be placed on the Council agendas fvr the
following Monday meeting (fourth Monday of the month). Such
written reques.ts must be submitted to the Zoning Administrator 7
days before the official Planning Commission meeting and shall
include facts and information to support this request.
Adopted by the City Counci 1 of the City of Orono,
�iinnesota, this 14t1i day af January, i�Sl.
"���'''�C"-t±�z.0 i�., ^�,, _,,����"-�-�_._�,`_ ,
!� � - v �' �.':``= ,�. ,�'�,�-�r%•
Barbara A. Peterson, Mayor ,
ATT T:
Do othy M llin, City Clerk
STATE OF M NESOTA ) � .
) ss.
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
i'i12 fOi2y^�ili�'j. iTlStrllIii2ii� 4t�aS 2��}Ci7^v4diECay^2C� be�ore I^�H O^
this 14th day of January, 1991, by Barbara A. Peterson & Doro'thy
NM. Hallin, Mayor & City Cleric of the City of Orono, a MinnesoLa
municipal corporation and said instrument was executed on behalf
of the City.
___,�1
, ,
''�ti`'° THERESA L. NAAB .� � �' � �
��'� �j3 ivv�n'r3Y ��1B��C - MINNESOTA � � J `-�r� !"i ,, _ ��
'�;>:.�. HENNEPIN COUNTY � ' � , ,; , ; � �! ,�?i'/��,.�^
:��_. ..:� /I_�-_._,<��n . �•
,( :?'`=,L:=. ' . MY commissian expv¢s 9-8-92
�_�;� . � _ _ Notary Public
,�,,,,,�...,..;�___
PaQe 2 of 7_