HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-19-2019 Council Work Session Packet1. Policy Discussion
Annual:
Orono City Council
Work Session
Tuesday, March 19, 2019
Council Chambers 6:00 p.m.
AGENDA
• Budget: Part of June, All of July, August and October.
• City Administrator & Police Chief Update (3 times per year for 15 minutes)
Previous Work Session Topics
February 25, 2019
• Park Commission Applicant Interviews:
• Planning Commission Applicant Interviews:
• LMCD Update — Mark Kroll
January 28, 2019
• 2019 Mission, Vision & Strategic Values
November 27, 2018
• 2019 Street Projects Update
• Budget Update
• Comprehensive Plan Update
MEMORANDUM
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: DUSTIN RIEF, CITY ADMINISTRATOR
SUBJECT: POLICY DISCUSSION
DATE: MARCH 19, 2019
1. Purpose. The purpose of this Agenda item is to discuss Policy only.
From: Dustin Rief
To: Denny Walsh; Victoria Seals; Richard Crosby; Aaron H. Printu ; Matt Johnson
Cc: Adam Edwards; Anna Carlson
Subject: FW: Legislative Alert - County Funding for Roads and Bridges
Date: Friday, March 15, 2019 9:14:29 AM
Attachments: MVLST fact sheet 101718 2oaaes FINAL.PDF
MVLST Draft Language.docx
Leased Sales Tax Bills.odf
imaae002.Dna
Mayor and Council,
Below is an email asking for support of a bill that would bring taxes generated in Hennepin
county back to the county to support infrastructure spending for the county. I am adding this as a
discussion point on the work session Tuesday.
Cordially,
Dustin J. Rief
City Administrator
f
fap�k ~
City of Orono
2750 Kelley Parkway
Orono, MN 55356
Phone: 952-249-4600
Fax: 952-249-4616
Email: drief e_ci.orono.mn.us
Web: http://www.ci.orono.mn.us/
From: Dave Callister [mailto:dcallister@plymouthmn.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2019 3:07 PM
To: jverbrugge@BloomingtonMN.gov; cboganey@ci.brooklyn-center.mn.us;
jay.stroebel@brooklynpark.org; bheitkamp@ci.champlin.mn.us; bmartens@ci.corcoran.mn.us;
anne.norris@crystalmn.gov; tgoodroad@cityofdaytommn.com; Dana Young;
rgetschow@edenprairie.org; sneal@EdinaMN.gov; kluger@ci.excelsior.mn.us;
tcruikshank@goldenvalleymn.gov; Brian Hagen; mmornson@hopkinsmn.com; mark@terra-
mark.com; sweske@longlakemn.gov; Mary K. Schneider; 'Heidi Nelson'; bschoen@mapleplain.com;
city_clerk@cityofinedicinelake.com; scott.johnson@ci.medina.mn.us; gbarone@eminnetonka.com;
Susanne Griffin; mbarone@ci.minnetrista.mn.us; erichoversten@cityofmound.com;
kmcdonald@ci.new-hope.mn.us; rgrams@ci.osseo.mn.us; Dave Callister;
mglick@ci.robbinsdale.mn.us; Dan Madsen; sstahmer@rogersmn.gov; mark.casey@savmn.com;
stboni@visi.coml; tharmening@stlouispark.org; dtolsma@ci.spring-park.mn.us; jdahl@wayzata.org;
Kathy McCullum; jtingley@cityoftonkabay.net; glerud@ci.shorewood.mn.us;
mwebb@ci.greenfield.mn.us; Dustin Rief; Pam Dmytrenko; Nuria.Rivera-
Vandermyde@minneapolismn.gov
Cc: 'David Hough'; Kareem D Murphy; john.doan@hennepin.us
Subject: Legislative Alert - County Funding for Roads and Bridges
Dear Colleagues:
In December of last year, I sent an email to all of you outlining that in 2015, state legislation
was passed to reallocate $32 million of the sales tax collected from leased vehicles from the
State's general fund, 50% to Greater Minnesota transit and 50% to metro counties through
the County State Aid Highway fund. In an effort to balance funding for transit and
roads/bridges, the law excludes Hennepin and Ramsey counties from receiving their
percentage of funding. Instead, the other five metro counties split the proceeds generated in
Hennepin and Ramsey counties. With the elimination of the CTIB Board in 2017, all seven
metro counties now collect their own local transportation sales tax, spend the proceeds on
their own transportation projects and have equal opportunity for funding. We are looking to
generate support to eliminate the exemption of Hennepin and Ramsey counties and to
distribute the sales tax on leased vehicles, per the county state aid formula, to all metro
counties. Distributing Hennepin and Ramsey county proceeds to the other five metro
counties puts cities in these counties at a disadvantage when it comes to accessing funds for
county road and bridge projects. This change would provide $10.7 million in annual funding to
Hennepin County for road and bridge improvements in our cities.
Now is the time to act to secure Hennepin County's share of funding. Every additional dollar
can be used for county road and bridge improvements in our cities.
The following bills have been introduced to make this happen:
HF 2194 (Reps Elkins, Hausman, Mahoney, Carlson,
L.. Hertaus, Nelson, Youakim, Howard, Carlson A., Robbins, Acomb)
SF 2087 (Senators Anderson, Isaacson, Franzen, Cohen)
We are asking for your continued support of this legislation by:
1. Contacting your State Legislators to explain the issue and ask for their support for HF
2194 and SF 2087.
2. Sending your legislative priorities or resolutions/letters or support to Hennepin County
officials.
I have attached a brochure, sample policy language and copies of the two bills.
Thank you for your attention to this important issue.
Dave Callister I City Manager
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, MN 55447
Phone: 763-509-5301
www.plymouthmn.gov
Plymouth, Minnesota I Adding Quality to Life
02/14/19 REVISOR KRB/NB 19-3644
This Document can be made available
in alternative formats upon request
State of Minnesota
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
NINETY-FIRST SESSION
03/07/2019 Authored by Elkins; Hausman; Mahoney; Carlson, L.; Hertaus and others
The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Ways and Means
1.1 A bill for an act
H. F. No. 2194
1.2 relating to transportation; allocating motor vehicle lease sales tax revenue to
1.3 Hennepin and Ramsey Counties; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, section
1.4 297A.815, subdivision 3.
1.5 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:
1.6 Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 297A.815, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
1.7 Subd. 3. Motor vehicle lease sales tax revenue. (a) On or before June 30 of each fiscal
1.8 year, the commissioner of revenue must estimate the revenues, including interest and
1.9 penalties and minus refunds, collected under this section for the current fiscal year.
1.10 (b) By July 15 of the subsequent fiscal year, the commissioner of management and
1.11 budget must transfer the revenues estimated under paragraph (a) from the general fund as
1.12 follows:
1.13 (1) 38 percent to the county state -aid highway fund;
1.14 (2) 38 percent to the greater Minnesota transit account;
1.15 (3) 13 percent to the Minnesota state transportation fund; and
1.16 (4) 11 percent to the highway user tax distribution fund.
1.17 (c) Notwithstanding any other law to the contrary, the commissioner of transportation
1.18 must allocate the funds transferred under paragraph (b), clause (1), to the counties in the
1.19 metropolitan area, as defined in section 473.121, subdivision 4,
1.20 Henflepin and Ramse51_1 so that each county receives the percentage that its population, as
1.21 defined in section 477A.011, subdivision 3, estimated or established by July 15 of the year
Section 1. 1
02/14/19 REVISOR KRB/NB 19-3644
2.1 prior to the current calendar year, bears to the total population of the counties receiving
2.2 funds under this paragraph.
2.3 (d) The amount transferred under paragraph (b), clause (3), must be used for the local
2.4 bridge program under section 174.50, subdivisions 6 to 7.
2.5 (e) The revenues under this subdivision do not include the revenues, including interest
2.6 and penalties and minus refunds, generated by the sales tax imposed under section 297A.62,
2.7 subdivision 1 a, which must be deposited as provided under the Minnesota Constitution,
2.8 article XI, section 15.
Section 1. 2
02/14/19 REVISOR KRB/NB 19-3644
SENATE
STATE OF MINNESOTA
NINETY-FIRST SESSION
(SENATE AUTHORS: ANDERSON, P., Isaacson, Franzen and Cohen)
DATE D -PG OFFICIAL STATUS
03/07/2019 691 Introduction and first reading
Referred to Taxes
1.1 A bill for an act
as introduced
S.F. No. 2087
1.2 relating to transportation; allocating motor vehicle lease sales tax revenue to
1.3 Hennepin and Ramsey Counties; amending Minnesota Statutes 2018, section
1.4 297A.815, subdivision 3.
1.5 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA:
1.6 Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2018, section 297A.815, subdivision 3, is amended to read:
1.7 Subd. 3. Motor vehicle lease sales tax revenue. (a) On or before June 30 of each fiscal
1.8 year, the commissioner of revenue must estimate the revenues, including interest and
1.9 penalties and minus refunds, collected under this section for the current fiscal year.
1.10 (b) By July 15 of the subsequent fiscal year, the commissioner of management and
1.11 budget must transfer the revenues estimated under paragraph (a) from the general fund as
1.12 follows:
1.13 (1) 38 percent to the county state -aid highway fund;
1.14 (2) 38 percent to the greater Minnesota transit account;
1.15 (3) 13 percent to the Minnesota state transportation fund; and
1.16 (4) 11 percent to the highway user tax distribution fund.
1.17 (c) Notwithstanding any other law to the contrary, the commissioner of transportation
1.18 must allocate the funds transferred under paragraph (b), clause (1), to the counties in the
1.19 metropolitan area, as defined in section 473.121, subdivision 4,
1.20 Henflepin and Ramse51_1 so that each county receives the percentage that its population, as
1.21 defined in section 477A.011, subdivision 3, estimated or established by July 15 of the year
Section 1. 1
02/14/19 REVISOR KRB/NB 19-3644 as introduced
2.1 prior to the current calendar year, bears to the total population of the counties receiving
2.2 funds under this paragraph.
2.3 (d) The amount transferred under paragraph (b), clause (3), must be used for the local
2.4 bridge program under section 174.50, subdivisions 6 to 7.
2.5 (e) The revenues under this subdivision do not include the revenues, including interest
2.6 and penalties and minus refunds, generated by the sales tax imposed under section 297A.62,
2.7 subdivision 1 a, which must be deposited as provided under the Minnesota Constitution,
2.8 article XI, section 15.
Section 1. 2
Short Version
Motor Vehicle Lease Sales Tax Allocation to Hennepin County. The city of advocates
for eliminating the exemption that prevents Hennepin and Ramsey counties from receiving their portion
of the sales tax on leased vehicles through the county state aid formula. This change would provide an
estimated $10.7 million in annual funding to Hennepin County to be used for improvements to roads
and bridges.
Long Version
Motor Vehicle Lease Sales Tax Allocation to Hennepin County. In 2015, state legislation was passed to
reallocate $32 million of the sales tax collected from leased vehicles from the State's general fund, 50%
to Greater Minnesota transit and 50% to metro counties through the County State Aid Highway fund. In
an effort to balance funding for transit and roads/bridges, the new law excluded Hennepin and Ramsey
counties from receiving their percentage of funding. Instead, the other five metro counties split the
proceeds generated in Hennepin and Ramsey counties. With the elimination of the CTIB Board in 2017,
all seven metro counties now collect their own local transportation sales tax, spend the proceeds on
their own transportation projects and have equal opportunity for funding. The City of
advocates for returning to the original intent by eliminating the exemption of Hennepin and Ramsey
counties and distributing the sales tax on leased vehicles, per the county state aid formula, to all metro
counties. Distributing Hennepin and Ramsey county proceeds to the other five metro counties puts
cities in these counties at a disadvantage when it comes to accessing county funds for road and bridge
projects. This change would provide an estimated $10.7 million in annual funding to Hennepin County
to be used for improvements to roads and bridges.
HENNEPIN COUNTY
MINNESOTA
Hennepin and Ramsey counties deliberately
excluded from metro -wide transportation funding
Minnesota's general sales tax applies to long-term motor vehicle leases
the motor vehicle lease sales tax (MVLST). Hennepin County residents
contribute substantially to the MVLST but the county is excluded by state law
from receiving funding from this transportation source. If included, Hennepin
County would receive $10.7 million annually for roads, bridges, and
pedestrian and bikeway projects.
Transportation funds critical to all counties including Hennepin
The economic strength and competitiveness of our state and region depend
on an effective, efficient and well-maintained transportation system. County
roads and bridges are a critical component of the state and regional
transportation system, and no county should be excluded from a key revenue
source for keeping pace with the escalating costs of maintaining our
transportation infrastructure.
Previous rationale for Hennepin exclusion has ceased to exist
In 2006, voters overwhelmingly supported a constitutional amendment to
dedicate the MVLST to transportation. Subsequent legislative action directed
the MVLST to transportation but excluded Hennepin and Ramsey counties.
The rationale to exclude Hennepin and Ramsey counties from receiving
MVLST formula funds was based on enabling of new taxing authority through
the creation of the Counties Transit Improvement Board (CTIB). With CTIB's
dissolution in 2017, this rationale for excluding Hennepin and Ramsey
counties from receiving MVLST formula funds has ceased to exist.
MVLST funds should be distributed to all seven metro counties
In FY2018, MVLST revenues are being distributed according to the following
formula:
• 11% Highway User Tax Distribution Fund (HUTDF)
• 13% MN Transportation Fund (Local Bridges)
• 38% Greater MN Transit
• 38% County State Aid Highway (CSAH) to five metro counties:
Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Scott, Washington
Contacts
Hennepin County
Intergovernmental Relations
Kareem Murphy
Director
Office: 612-596-9711
Cell: 612-559-5279
kareem.murphy@hennepin.us
Transportation Planning
John Doan
Assistant Director
Office: 612-543-1468
Cell: 763-355-8746
john.doan@hennepin.us
Website
hennepin.us
October 2018
Hennepin
MVLST DISTRIBUTION
0 2011-2018 0 2019-2021
Ln
It
M
N � N
Z o m
O r')
J
c
C N
N N
rl N
ANOKA CARVER DAKOTA SCOTT WASHINGTON
Hennepin needs MVLST funding for essential
road and bridge infrastructure
Hennepin County has more than double the
center line miles, more than four times the signalized
intersections, and serves twice the vehicle miles
traveled of any of the five counties receiving MVLST
revenues. Hennepin County's 25 -year construction
needs exceed $1.3 billion, based on the 2018 MnDOT
CSAH Distribution Report. When compared to the five
counties receiving the MVLST, our need is equal to
73% of the five other counties combined. MnDOT's
estimated Money Needs for each of the seven metro
counties is shown in the chart at right.
The 38% of revenue distributed to the CSAH fund is
allocated to only five metro counties, Anoka, Carver,
Dakota, Scott and Washington, and excludes Ramsey
and Hennepin. The MVLST is distributed
proportionally based on the population in each of the
five eligible metro counties. In FY2018, nearly
$40 million was generated and distributed to the five
metro counties. If FY2018 MVLST funds were
distributed to all seven metro counties, Hennepin
County's share would have been approximately $10.7
million. Between 2011 and 2021, an estimated $270
million in MVLST revenues will be distributed to
Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Scott, and Washington
counties for use on their county roads. Since 2011,
approximately $160 million in MVLST revenues have
been distributed to those five counties, and it is
anticipated that an additional $110 million will be
provided by 2021.
COUNTY TRANSPORTATION NEEDS
$1,325
Money Needs (in MIL)
■ Anoka
■ Carver
■ Dakota
■ Hennepin
■ Ramsey
■ Scott
■ Washington
TRANSPORTATION STATE AID
More transportation funds generated in
PER CAPITA
Hennepin should stay in Hennepin
$140 $132
According to the Minnesota House Research
December 2017 State Aid Report, Hennepin County
$120
generated approximately $480 million from the Motor
Vehicle Sales Tax, Registration Tax and Fuels Tax
$100
combined in 2014. In the same year, Hennepin County
$79
$So
and its 45 municipalities received $83.4 million in the
$69
form of County and Municipal Highway State Aid. Thus,
$60
about $400 million per year of transportation funds
generated within Hennepin County went to fund
$4o
statewide priorities.
$20
Currently, Hennepin County receives $69 per capita in
$0
the form of County and Municipal Highway State Aid,
Hennepin Metro Counties Statewide
compared to $79 per capita metro -wide and $132 per
capita statewide.
March 15, 2019
Representative Jerry Hertaus
389 State Office Building
St. Paul, MN 55155
Representative Kelly Morrison
429 State Office Building
St. Paul, MN 55155
NFUNI• •�• •
Street Address: ( Mailing Address: I Telephone (952) 249-4600
2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Fax (952) 249-4616
Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 www.ci.orono.mn.us
Dear, Representative Hertaus, and Representative Morrison
I am writing to express the City of Orono's support for HF 2031 Hertaus , Murphy, Layman ,
Persell , Xiong, T. , Erickson , Theis , Fischer, Marguart , Klevorn , Robbins , Lueck , Dettmer ,
Albright , Drazkowski) legislation that improves the distribution of LGA funding to municipalities.
Under the current formula Orono does not qualify to receive funding. The 2% set a side helps
balance the redistribution of funds paid by our residents and would greatly impact the City of
Orono infrastructure funding. Orono is one of 95 cities that represent 20% of the state's
population, but do not receive LGA funding.
If you have further questions on this bill, please contact me at (612) 414-5055 or by email at
dwalsh2(a)-ci.orono.mn.us. Thank you for considering this request.
Sincerely,
Dennis Walsh
Mayor, City of Orono
Dustin Rief
From:
Dave Callister <dcallister@plymouthmn.gov>
Sent:
Tuesday, March 12, 2019 3:07 PM
To:
jverbrugge@BloomingtonMN.gov; cboganey@ci.brooklyn-center.mn.us;
jay.stroebel@brooklynpark.org; bheitkamp@ci.champlin.mn.us;
bmartens@ci.corcoran.mn.us; anne.norris@crystalmn.gov;
tgoodroad@cityofdaytommn.com; Dana Young; rgetschow@edenprairie.org;
sneal@EdinaMN.gov; kluger@ci.excelsior.mn.us; tcruikshank@goldenvalleymn.gov;
Brian Hagen; mmornson@hopkinsmn.com; mark@terra-mark.com;
sweske@longlakemn.gov; Mary K. Schneider; 'Heidi Nelson'; bschoen@mapleplain.com;
city_clerk@cityofinedicinelake.com; Scott Johnson@ci.medina.mn.us;
gbarone@eminnetonka.com; Susanne Griffin; mbarone@ci.minnetrista.mn.us;
erichoversten@cityofmound.com; kmcdonald@ci.new-hope.mn.us;
rgrams@ci.osseo.mn.us; Dave Callister; mglick@ci.robbinsdale.mn.us; Dan Madsen;
sstahmer@rogersmn.gov; mark.casey@savmn.com; stboni@visi.com1;
tharmening@stlouispark.org; dtolsma@ci.spring-park.mn.us; jdahl@wayzata.org; Kathy
McCullum; jtingley@cityoftonkabay.net; glerud@ci.shorewood.mn.us;
mwebb@ci.greenfield.mn.us; Dustin Rief; Pam Dmytrenko; Nuria.Rivera-
Vandermyde@minneapolismn.gov
Cc:
'David Hough'; Kareem D Murphy; john.doan@hennepin.us
Subject:
Legislative Alert - County Funding for Roads and Bridges
Attachments:
MVLST fact sheet_101718_2pages FINAL.PDF; MVLST Draft Language.docx; Leased Sales
Tax Bills.pdf
Dear Colleagues:
In December of last year, I sent an email to all of you outlining that in 2015, state legislation was passed to
reallocate $32 million of the sales tax collected from leased vehicles from the State's general fund, 50% to
Greater Minnesota transit and 50% to metro counties through the County State Aid Highway fund. In an effort
to balance funding for transit and roads/bridges, the law excludes Hennepin and Ramsey counties from
receiving their percentage of funding. Instead, the other five metro counties split the proceeds generated in
Hennepin and Ramsey counties. With the elimination of the CTIB Board in 2017, all seven metro counties now
collect their own local transportation sales tax, spend the proceeds on their own transportation projects and
have equal opportunity for funding. We are looking to generate support to eliminate the exemption of
Hennepin and Ramsey counties and to distribute the sales tax on leased vehicles, per the county state aid
formula, to all metro counties. Distributing Hennepin and Ramsey county proceeds to the other five metro
counties puts cities in these counties at a disadvantage when it comes to accessing funds for county road and
bridge projects. This change would provide $10.7 million in annual funding to Hennepin County for road and
bridge improvements in our cities.
Now is the time to act to secure Hennepin County's share of funding. Every additional dollar can be used for
county road and bridge improvements in our cities.
The following bills have been introduced to make this happen:
HF 2194 (Reps Elkins, Hausman, Mahoney, Carlson, L., Hertaus, Nelson, Youakim, Howard, Carlson A.,
Robbins, Acomb)
SF 2087 (Senators Anderson, Isaacson, Franzen, Cohen)
We are asking for your continued support of this legislation by:
1. Contacting your State Legislators to explain the issue and ask for their support for HF 2194 and SF
2087.
2. Sending your legislative priorities or resolutions/letters or support to Hennepin County officials.
I have attached a brochure, sample policy language and copies of the two bills.
Thank you for your attention to this important issue.
Dave Callister I City Manager
City of Plymouth
3400 Plymouth Boulevard
Plymouth, MN 55447
Phone: 763-509-5301
www.plymouthmn.gov
Plymouth, Minnesota I Adding Quality to Life
Short Version
Motor Vehicle Lease Sales Tax Allocation to Hennepin County. The city of advocates
for eliminating the exemption that prevents Hennepin and Ramsey counties from receiving their portion
of the sales tax on leased vehicles through the county state aid formula. This change would provide an
estimated $10.7 million in annual funding to Hennepin County to be used for improvements to roads
and bridges.
Long Version
Motor Vehicle Lease Sales Tax Allocation to Hennepin County. In 2015, state legislation was passed to
reallocate $32 million of the sales tax collected from leased vehicles from the State's general fund, 50%
to Greater Minnesota transit and 50% to metro counties through the County State Aid Highway fund. In
an effort to balance funding for transit and roads/bridges, the new law excluded Hennepin and Ramsey
counties from receiving their percentage of funding. Instead, the other five metro counties split the
proceeds generated in Hennepin and Ramsey counties. With the elimination of the CTIB Board in 2017,
all seven metro counties now collect their own local transportation sales tax, spend the proceeds on
their own transportation projects and have equal opportunity for funding. The City of
advocates for returning to the original intent by eliminating the exemption of Hennepin and Ramsey
counties and distributing the sales tax on leased vehicles, per the county state aid formula, to all metro
counties. Distributing Hennepin and Ramsey county proceeds to the other five metro counties puts
cities in these counties at a disadvantage when it comes to accessing county funds for road and bridge
projects. This change would provide an estimated $10.7 million in annual funding to Hennepin County
to be used for improvements to roads and bridges.
ky-y
/9VIS
if "L
coo
ne6l IoLl 4
i7
cjho-s Agre
ALl=1'q
coo
ne6l IoLl 4
i7
2018 Call and Hours Report
F(re, other (100)
0
0
5
0
5
Building fire (111)
1
0
3
11
15
Fires in structure other than a building (112)
0
1
0
0
1
Cooking fire, confined to container (113)
1
0
0
0
1
Chimney or flue fire, confined to chimney or flue (114)
0
0
1
0
1
Fire in portable building, Rxed location (123)
0
0
1
0
1
Road freight or transport vehicle fire (132)
1
0
0
0
1
Brush or brush -and -grass mixture fire (142)
of
1
0
0
1
Grass fire (143)
1
0
0
0
1
Outside rubbish fire, other (150)
0
0
1
0
1
Outside rubbish, trash or waste fire (151)
0
0
1
0
1
Dumpster or other outside trash receptacle fire (154)
1
0
0
0
1
Outside equipment fire 162)
0
0
1
0
1
5
2
13
11
31
Special type of Incident, other (200)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
eS .... f e0 , -0 a! W11�(�!
Person Down (309)
1
0
0
0
1
Medical assist, assist EMS crew (311)
25
5
76
0
106
Emergency medical service, other (320)
0
0
0
0
0
Motor vehicle accident with Injuries (322)
1
0
4
0
5
Motor vehicle/pedestrian accident (MV Ped) (323)
0
0
0
0
0
Motor vehicle accident with no Injuries. (324)
0
0
1
0
1
Extrication, rescue, other 350)
0
0
1
0
1
Extrication of victims from vehicle (352)
0
0
0
1
1
Removal of victim(s) from stalled elevator (353)
01
0
1
01
Trench/below-grade rescue (3S4)
0
0
0
0
0
Water & Ice -related rescue, other (360
0
0
1
0
1
ice Rescue (362)
0
0
1
0
1
Watercraft rescue (365
0
0
1
0
1
Trapped by power lines (372)
1
0
0
0
1
Rescue or EMS standby (381)
0
0
0
0
0
28
5
86
1
120
tfo NoiS
:
Hazardous condition, other (400)
0
0
1
0
1
Combustible/flammable gas/liquid condition, other 410
0
0
0
0
0
Gasoline or other flammable liquid spill(411)
0
0
3
0
3
Gas leak (natural gas or LPG) (412) -
2
0
18
0
20
Oil or other combustible liquid spill (413)
0
0
1
0
1
Carbon monoxide incident (424)
1
1
3
0
5
Electrical wiring/equipment problem, other (440)
0
0
0
0
0
Heat from short circuit (wiring), defective/worn (441)
0
0
3
0
3
Overheated motor (442)
0
0
1
0
1
Breakdown of light ballast (443)
1
0
0
0
1
Power line down (444)
21
0
26
0
28
Arcing, shorted electrical equipment (445)
0
0
5
0
5
Accident, potential accident, other (460)
1
0
0
0
1
Vehicle accident, general cleanup (463)
0
0
3
0
3
7
1
64
0
72
SUMCMI
Service Call, other (500)
0
0
1
0
1
Person in distress, other (510)
0
0
2
0
2
Water evacuation (521)
0
0
0
0
0
Water or steam leak 522
1
0
0
0
1
Smoke or odor removal (531)
0
0
2
0
2
Public service assistance, other (550)
0
0
1
0
1
Assist police or other governmental agency (551)
0
0
3
0
3
Police matter (552)
0
0
1
0
1
Public service (553)
0
0
1
0
1
Assist invalid (554)
0
0
4
0
4
Unauthorized burning 1561)
0
0
1
0
1
Cover assignment, standby, moveup (571)
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
17
0
18
atched and cancelled an route (611)
5
3
68
1
77
itfound on arrival at dispatch address (622)
1
0
5
0
6
controlled burning 631)
0
0
8
0
8
ribed fire(632)
0
0
1ke
scare, odor of smoke (651)
0
0
4
0
4
at release investigation w/no HazMat (671
1
0
2
0
3
;Authorized
7
3
88
1
99
alarm or false call, other (700)
0
0
1
0
1
ral station, malicious false alarm (714)
0
0
0
0
0
m malrunction, other (730)
0
0
20
2
kler activation due to malfunction (731)
1
0
2
0
3ke
detector activation due to malfunction (733)
0
0
1
0
1
m system sounded due to malfunction (735
0
1
3
0
4
etector activation due to malfunction (736)
0
0
1
0
1
Unintentional transmission of alarm, other (740)
0
0
3
0
3
Smoke detector activation, no fire - unintentional (743)
0
0
7
1
8
Detector activation, no fire - unintentional (744)
2
2
10
0
14
Alarm system activation, no fire-unintentional(745)
1
2
24
0
27
Carbon monoxide detector activation, no CO (746)
3
2
5
0
10
7
7
59
1
74
ese a rel VeitilteNaiYSiiDYiisfeMEWWWA—
Special type of Incident, other (800)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
k
Special type of Incident, other (900)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Dustin Rief
From: Ron Olson
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2019 4:50 PM
To: Dustin Rief
Subject: Fire Assets
Attachments: Orono Share of Assets.pdf
Dustin,
Attached are the vehicles and capital equipment that have been purchased by the Long Lake Fire Department since
1997. The first two vehicles on the Vt page were purchased by Orono and we already own them. We are the majority
owner of the other vehicles that are listed; our percentage of ownership is indicated. Based on the vague wording of the
service agreement I would assume that Long Lake will maintain that we need to pay the balance of the purchase price of
the equipment. I am not sure that this was the intent of the agreement, but Long Lake could certainly make the
argument. The second page is capital equipment. These are the items that I believe we would be required to purchase
in addition to the vehicles. Long Lake may contend that we would need to purchase additional equipment but based on
the contract language major equipment (capital) is required to be purchased.
As we have discussed, the purchase of the actually building may or may not be required. We own 50% of the building,
but Orono is the only City that actually paid money out of pocket for the land and building. Long Lake's share was more
than covered by State relocation funds as part of the Highway 12 project.
Ron
Vehicle Year Orono Orono
Equip Purchased Cost (Est) Paid Ownership
Engine 21
Rescue 21
Rescue 12
Tanker 11
Tanker 12
Utility 11
Utility 12
Utility 21 (formally 12?)
CMD 1
CMD 2
Engine 11
Engine 12
Totals - Shared Ownership
Buyout Based on Original Price
2003 197,500.00 197,500.00 100.00%
2004 130,380.00 130,380.00 100.00%
2004
225,856.00
174,016.00
77.00% Est
2009
166,550.00
140,150.00
84.15%
2001
90,682.20
69,371.88
76.50% Est
1997
28,074.00
76.50% Est
1999
56,857.00
15,395.00
76.50% Est
2015
Donation & Trade of U14
-
83.61%
2000
Donation
-
76.50% Est
2013
41,010.00
33,930.00
82.73%
2011
34,571.00
28,898.00
83.59%
2003
221,541.00
169,035.42
76.20% Est
2017
474,650.00
394,050.00
83.02%
1,311,717.20
1,052,920.30
258,796.90
Capital Assets
Year
Paid by
Orono
%
Paid
Total
Cost
Balance
Turn Out Gear
2006
16,000.00
78.00%
20,512.82
4,512.82
SCBA - Navarre
2006
45,267.00
78.00%
58,034.62
12,767.62
SCBA - Willow
2006
101,250.00
78.00%
129,807.69
28,557.69
Pagers
2008
2,600.00
81.60%
3,186.27
586.27
Extrication Tools
2009
7,150.00
84.15%
8,496.73
1,346.73
Pagers
2009
620.00
84.15%
736.78
116.78
EOC Updates
2015
20,650.00
83.61%
24,698.00
4,048.00
Radio Replacements
2015
16,652.00
83.61%
19,916.28
3,264.28
Navarre Improvements
2017
19,086.00
83.02%
22,989.64
3,903.64
Radios
2018
77,567.81
85.36%
90,871.38
13,303.57
72,407.41
2006 % is an estimate