The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutseptic info ' �. � a- Minnesota Pollution • • = ControlA�ency C�mpl�ance Inspect�on Form 520 Lafayette Road North Existing Subsurtace Sewage Treatroent Systems St Paui,MN 55155-419A (SSTS) Doc Type:Compliance and Enforcement Instructiona: Inspection results based on Minnesota Pollution Corrtrol Agency(MPCA) For local tracking purposes: requirements and attached forms–additional local requirements may also apply. ( I Submit completed form to Locai Unit of Government(LUG)and sysbem owner with1n 15 days � System Status System status on date(mm/dd/yyyy): 9/7/2018 � Compliant-Certificate of Compliance ❑ Noncompliant-Notice of Noncompliance (Valid for 3 years from report date, unless shorter time (See Upgrade Requir�me»ts on page 3) frame outlined in Local Ordinance.) Reason(s)for noncomplfance(check all applicable) ❑Impad on Public Health(Compliance Component #1)-Imminent thneaf fo public health and safety ❑Other Complianoe Conditions(Compliance Component#3)-Imminent threat to public health and saiety ❑Tank integrity(Complience Component #2)–Failing to protect groundwater ❑Other Compliance Conditions(Complience Componenf#3)–Failing fo protect groundwater ❑Soil Separation(Compliance Component #4)–Failing to protect groundwater ❑Operating permiUmonitoring plan requirements(Complience Component #5)–Noncompliant Property Information Parcel ID#or SecJTwp/Range: 2511823340002 Property address: 465 Spring Hill,Orono,MN Reason for inspedion: Property Transfer ` Property owner: Richard Zona _ Owner's phone: 612-309-5351 flr _. Owner's representative: _ Representative phone: Local regulatory authoriry: CiN of Orono __ Regulatory authority phone: 952-249-4600 2-1250 septic tanks and 1-1250 gallon liit station and 630 square feet of mound rockbed. per city Brief system description: records Comments or recommenda6ons: � TBM: Bottom of the rock bed.There is 2.7 Feet of sand under the rock bed. Certification I hertsby certify that all the necessary information has baen gathered to determine the campliance status of this system.No deteimina8on of future system pedormance has been nor can be made due to unknown conditions during system conshvction, possib/e abuse of fhe system,inadequate mainfenance, or future water usage. Inspector name: JOS@ph J Olson __ Certification number: 1255 Business name: Rus Olson's Soil&Perc.Testin License number: 810 Inspector signature: Phone number: 763-498-8779 Necessary or Locally Required Attachments �Soil boring logs �System/As-built drawing ❑Fom1s per loCal ordinanCe ❑Other information(list): .—_. ,�. www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 TfY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in attemative formats wq-wwists4-31 • f/24/12 Page 1 of 3 ' Property address: 465 Spring Hill,Orono,MN ___ __ Inspector initials/Date: J.O.9/07/18 1. ImpaCt on Publit Health—Compliance component#1 of 5 Compliance criteria: � Verification method(s): System discharge sewage to the j ❑Yes � No � Searched for surface outlet ground surface. � Searched for seeping in yard/badcup in home System discharge sewage to drain tile fi�Yes �No ❑ Excessive ponding in soil system/D-boxes or surface waters. ❑ Homeowner testimony(See Comments/Explanation) System cause sewage backup into ❑Yes �No � �Bladc soil"above soil dispersal system dwelling or establishment. � ❑ System requires"emergenc�l'pumping Any"yes"answer above indicates the system is � Performed dye test ❑ Unable to verify(See CommentsiExplanation) an/mminent Threat to Public Health and Safety. ❑ Other methods not listed(See Comments/Explanation) Comments/Explanation: 2. Tank Integrity—Compliance component#2 of 5 Compliance criteria: Verlfication method(s): System consists of a seepage pit, r�Yes �No ❑ Probed tank(s)bottom cesspool,drywell,or leaching pit. � Examined construction records Seepage pits maeting 7080.2550 may be ❑ Examined Tank Integrity Form(Attach) compliant if allowed in local ordinance. � ❑ Observed liquid level below operating depth Sewage tank{s)leak below their �' p Yes �No � Examined empty(pumped)tanks(s) designed operating depth. If yes,which sewage tank(s)leaks: � ' ❑ Probed outside tank(s)for"black soil" Any "yes"answer above indicates the ❑ Unable to verify(See CommentsJExplanation) system is Fallfng to Protect Groundwater. �Other methods not listed(See Comments/Explanation) Comments/Explanation: The tanks are operating at there normal level and the baffels are in place. 3. Other Compliance Conditions—Compliance component#3 of 5 a. Mairrtenance hole covers are dama9ed,cracked,unsecured,or appear to structurally unsound. ❑Yes• �No ❑Unknoam b. Other issues(ele�tricer hazarols,etc.)to immediately and adversely impad public heatth or safety. ❑Yes' �No 0 Unknown *System is an lmminent threat fo�blic heaftl�and safety Explain: c. System is non-protective of ground water for other conditions as detertr�ined by inspector ❑Yes• �No "System!s fafling to probect groundwate� Explain: www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-296-6300 • 800-657-3864 • TTY 651-282-5332 or 800-657-3864 • Available in altemative formats wq-wwists4-31 . f/24/7Z Page 2 of 3 ' Property address: 465 Spring Hill,Orono MN Inspector initials/Date: J.O.9/07/18 4. Soil Separation—Compliance component#4 of 5 Date of installation: __ �Unknown Venfication method(s): ShorelandNVellhead protectioNFood Beverage �Yes ❑No Soil observaSon does not expire. Previous soil Lodging? obse�vations by lwo independent parties are suff+cient, COmpliance Criteria: unless site conditions have been altered or local For systems builf pnor to Apn11, 1996,and ❑Yes ❑No � �puirements differ. �.-- not located in Shorieland or Wellhead � � Conducted soil observation(s)(Attach boring logs) Protection Area or not serving a food, ❑ Two previous verifications(Attach bainp logs) beverage or lodging establishment: ❑ Not applicable(Holding tank(s),no drainfield) Drainfield has at least a two-foot vertical ❑ Unable to verify(See Com�nts/Explanetion) separation distance from periodically saturated soil or bedrodc. ❑ Othe�(See Comments/Exp/anation) Non-perfom►ance systems built April 1, � �Yes ❑No Comments/Exp/anation: 1996,or later or for non perfom►ance systems focated in Shoreland or Wellhead Protection Areas or serving a food, beverage, or lodging esta6lishment: Drainfield has a three-foot vertical � separation distance from periodically } saturated soil or bedrodc." — -- � "Experimental; "Other; or Perfom►ance" i ❑Yes ❑No Indicate depths of elevationa systems built unde�pre-2008 Rules;Type N or V systems built under 2008 Rules(7080. � A. eottom of distribution media , 100.0 2350 or 7080.2400 (Advanced Inspedor � — License required) B. periodicall saturated solubedrodc 97.3 Drainfield meets the designed vertical C. System seaaration 2.7 Y separation distance from periodically — saturated soil or bedrodc. ' D. Required com liance se aration* 2.6 AAy"no"answer above indicates the system is ''May be reduc.ed up to 15 percent if allowed by Local _ Failing to Protect Groundwater. Ordinance. 5. Operating Permit and Nitrogen BMP*—Compliancs component#5 of 5 �Not applicable Is the system operated under an Operating Permit? ❑Yes ❑No If"yes",A below IS requlrad Is the system required to employ a Nitrogen BMP? ❑Yes ❑No If"yes",B below is required BMP=Best Management Practice(s)specified in the system design If the answer to both questfons is "no'; this section does not need to be comp/eted. Compliance criteria a. Operating Permit�umber: __ Have the Operating Permit requirements been met? ❑Yes ❑No b. Is the required nitrogen BMP in place and properlv functionin ? Yes No i Any"no"answer indicates Noncompliance. Upgrade Requlrements(Minn. Stat.§>i5.55)An imminent threat to public health and safety(lTPHSJ must be upgraded,replaced,or its use discontinued wifhirr ten months of receipt of this notice or within a shorter period ii required by local ordinenoe.If the system is falling to protect ground water,the system must be upgraded,replaced,or ils use discontinued within the time required by local ordinance.!f an existing system is not failing as de�ned in lew,and hes at least hao feet of design soil separation,then the system need not be upgraded,riepaired,replaced,or its use discontinued,notwithstending eny local adinance that is more strict. This provision does not apply to systems in shoieland areas, WeOhead Protection Ar�as,or those used in connection with food,beverage,and lodging esfablishments as defined in law. --.—.. _ -- --_ —_ www.pca.state.mn.us • 651-29b-6300 • 800•657-3864 • TTY 651-282•5332 or 800-657-3864 • Availabte in altemative formats wq-wwists4-31 • 1/24/12 Poge 3 of 3 � Soil Observation Log www.SepticResource.com vers 12.4 Owner Infarmation Property Owner/project: Richard Zona Date 9/3/2018 Property Address/PID: 465 Spring Hill Road Soil Surve Information ❑refer to attached soll�rvey Parent matl's: �Tiil ❑Outwash ❑Lacustrine ❑Allwium ❑Organic ❑Bedrock lar�dscape position: ❑Summit ❑Shoulder 0 Side slope ❑Tce slope soil survey map uniu: L22ll2 slope % direction-Lineal Soii Lo #1 �B0��9 � �'t Elevation 101.7 Depth to SHWT 56 inches De th(in) Texture fragment% matrix color redox color consistence grade shape 0-53 Fill <35 Loose Loose 5ingle grain 53-60 Topsoil <35 10yr3/2 10y4/8 Friable Moderate slocky <35 loose loose singlc grain 35-50 friable wealc granular blocky >50 f� mOdefaie prismatic platy rigid �ong massive �35 loose loose sing►e grain 35-50 friable weak granu�a� blocky >50 fi� moderate prismatic p�ary rlgid Strong massive <35 loose loose single grain 35-50 friable weak graz,uiar b�ocky >50 f� moderate prismatic plary rigid StTOrig massive Comments: , 465 S rin Hill Road Soil Lo #2 �Boring ❑ Pit Elevation 100.6 Depth to SHWT 41 ]nches Depth(in) Texture fragment% �natrix color redox color consistence grade shape 0-41 Sand loam Fill <35 Loose Loose Single grain 41-48 Topsoil <35 10yr3/2 10y4/8 Friable Moderate B�ocky �35 loose loose g�ng�e grain 35-50 friable weak granular b�ocky >50 f� moderate prismacic ptary rigid strong massive �35 loose loose single grain 35-50 fr��e �'e� granular blocky >SO f� moderate prismetic pla�� rigid strong massive ��5 lOOse IOOSe single grain 35-50 friable weak granular bloc�.y >50 �� moderate prismatic platy rigid strong massive 465 S rin Hill Road Soil Lo #3 � Boring ❑ Pit Elevation Depth to SH WT Depth(in) Texture fragment% matrix color redox color consistence grade shape <35 loose loose single grain 35-SO friable weak granular blocky >50 f� moderate prismatic Piary rigid Strong massive <35 �oOse lOOse single grain 35-50 friable weak granutar b�oc}.y firnl modeT3te prismatic platy >50 rigid strong macsive <35 loose loose single grain 35-50 friable weak granutar btocky �50 �� moderate prismacic platy rigid strong massive �35 loose loose singte grain 35-50 friabte weak granu�ar bloc6�• >50 fi� moderate prismatic piary rigid strong massive <35 loose loose single grain 35-50 friable weak granu�ar b�ocky >50 f� moderate pnsmatic p�ary rigid strong massive I hereby certi his work was completed in accorda»ce with MN 7080 and arry loca!req's. Rusty Olson's Soil& Perc 810 signer Signature Company License# ~�� '\ � •. .+�, '� • y` .�� . •` . � �� ` � � '• �. �, �.,., L \ '� �� v ��`1 1 `� 1 �`��, t'a� /,r�� `��` ��if `,� ` �` ��.�1� ��•+.,,��"� _!�'�"�►.1� ' ,��.•� ` •\ �_ ��" �+-� f r 1 �, �/�� `'' i,�y�C._�,�` `� /�`,\ ' � tl'� �1 ��` J"t� �` '� , ` j /.0--.,` � .`�,,,-� --�„�1 ,�-—---• . �6ra�1.ti'�,`�.�� ' --��'`� ——.---- �' � �J ��'�� 1 �. `.. '.,—} :1 ~� / � ./��'�� ,r..., �" -� `�� `� • � �� ' � � / '�-.� � \, � ' . �,f�`,� / s� `, . . ' � �\r� �'�� '�"�'.' �'` 1 �4 `""�—"" �'/ ,1`' � � ~_�` `� ', � �~�. �. � � � 'n,� � �------ -- f � �'"�- `'`�,`�.� `� `.. � � � �'/�� r r,r��r•�'! �'^�` \ � � /� / �„�. ��r.. '''' ?�\�`�``` ` '''� r' ,.• � .�' � � ' � � / .�-''— �-- , • .�� `, s/ / � '�'�.�'��o � / ��„ — _.� _ �� 1�;`�\��'�. . s� �� / �/ /� � .,,,,.� "1 '�,��\ � �� / ` r ! �� 'r ~•� � .��. `� �� i' �' i' ' � � - . .�,. �--.` ..,��,,..� � .r'� .� .� � � � � „ _ ;t�,,,,�.� ..,: - �\ / / /' ' y� --�" `" --�� .\��, /' � � + ,.""'_'� _„ _ �� ' �i'�.�'�` • �i�S�� / ...r ��-�.`' , `ti�. �� r : �� ' : .f ' `' ' ��"'+"� .�►�� •��1� �V /�/+ / �� .. �� ' 'r _� � ,.�\ �. "�"' �;"� � '�� // �.�'�J � . / � ^� `�.,� ```-�....._ ' � �� • •r„� -� . �� ` � / / %�` r � p�.� ' -� /��,,~�'•• ` � �`' ��r� �i �/ /' / //�,// i '�� ,,..�- �.` . � � `�\� . ,� . � ,i // � ,/ :r �'� : �,�✓� , -,` � �,J ', ��• ` r,� j,i �„r , /,f� .. �';,�.�' � � � �� a.�'�, `'�� ••. . /��'/ �/� • r' . � ''� ��'��`� � � /'� ,._...,._.r---r� ��.v� 1� l •�.d �` �` I� __ �. --- �� ,1 ��;�' .� �� , � �' � i �� — . .�,,��- �, a ��'�`j Q� `� 1 � �r` ` \ , r �.�' .� �I '��'�,, �'` . ��``` ~ �` `*,,,�i� 1 /' f. / r � � �''' '. /�� 0'r 1 l� �� .,` � �.� . � � '''� �'�� „� � 't - `s. . � �' C9� � p � � . -p _ \ / '`' `�0 -� � � •t . . . . : � .. o• . -� �. . � t , � q , / � b� . '"0 • '` � , • � � • ,� '�3 O �'!� �j'(f� ; � ,`�'`\ 'a � '� 1 ',� 9� � -m � ��R , j '� .i �� " � '� `: �:�� i � �� ( � i � 4 � �. / � .� �..."1��, ' i� �\ � �. , � �, ; • �. ` �j � � � \ . �� ' -+�a ' � �' �� w�► � � � � i �i � � � �ti \ . � ' . ' � � �`�I ! �^�► � �� / s ��y.�� +:�• � �` � •, . � /_' i . j �� e � ,�t - � , � •ti � �� ,� ` �� •�� n.�. .t � � 1 - i� �`•' . r . ��' ' '•.1�p � �t » z� —'. ��, s % � � �� ' Y.. rp'OZ � '� �.. a,.p:1•�• � f • . �, +,j /. ' • �•• f �� .s-'�::_ .' ' " • , .o�l � ...}!� ,.••�': � � i • . ' i �+ �� •'+ � �»...��i... �.i y�} � _p.�- s� L ....�+..�044(� �r.+!: t //� /W �ii i �• �� i, j I �• � � •� • SEPTIC SYSTEM INVENTOR Y Address: 465 Spring Hill Rd. PID: 25-118-23 34 0002 Building Type:residence BRs Install'd for: 4 In Musa: No Permit#: 9030 Date of Permit: 6/1/87 Installer: Sullivans System Type: standard trench Experimental: no Tank Filter: SYSTEM CONDITION Confornuty: 1 Tank Condition: 6 DF condition: 11 Failure Pot: low � � SEPTIC TANKS � � Material: concrete block Capacity: 750, 750, 1000 �� Setback to Bldg: 50 Cesspool: no � � DRAINFIELD Length of Lines: 400 # Lines: 6 Trench Width: 3 Treatment Area: 1200 Type of Filter: rock Soil Boring: yes Tile Size: 4 Under Tile: 6 Perc Rate: 26 Setback DF-Bldg: 40 DF Ht above Wt: 3 Soil Type: clay loam, silty clay Limitations: none WELL DATA Setbacks - Well-Tanks: 75 Well-DF: 135 Report in File � Pump Type: Depth: Diameter: Method: INSPECTION RECORD PUMPOUT RECORD DATE DESCRIPTION � COMPLIANCE DATE GALLONS 7/7/81 DF saturated 3 7/9/81 1000 8/25/86 DF surfacing 4 9/3/86 800 6/3/87 add tank(1000 gal),DF (1200 sfl 1 4/23/93 1200 6/22/90 need cover on DF-no surfacing 1 4/21/93 no surfacing-pump tanks 1 8/20/O1 800 7/18/95 no surfacing 1 �Z- (-o� /�i� 9/4/98 compliant 1 7/12/00 no surfacing, pump tanks 1 10/11/02 no surfacing code system �C9� (v'� o i< j ?� � � ��A-� �S I � _ � _ — , � �� __._'—� � w z�� . � � \ - ( �, � � � � a � � r• i s � �. �� \ �, �,� \ � A ��P� ,�' ,� ► , . ,, , , . �XyS, ' � g _ � �3�`3s� � , F'� 3, T� �►' ti�' S-z's �'+ -�8a, "' T� �N 53�io S�,'lo �..' �;� �� o T3 ,,, ��s I1�'8 . o E'v, �' -r3 c,�r Ios'� II`�' ►r . D t� 1 i�b`S 131� 7 � D �� z. 12'� I 3n'� p � 3 i3`t'� 1�3'S � D a 4 �N'7' Iv�� . p¢ s rs�'3 I'7�l�3 . CS e�A Bo vG) � , , ---- �c� c� 1�� s igy l� �� S �'� ' � 1�� 1� I� g � o�� . � .�O O \\1,\t �� J . � CITY of ORONO ,,..;,.,P�J:, r� ,','; .. �,...:: r'� ' , �': Dy�. ,r;;l_., !, �, ,. Municipal Offices . '.�: . 'ti ��,�� , `r;�''�;Fa�G Street Address: �15o�.-a4 q—�60 � Mailing Address: �xEBII�¢ 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, N 55323-0066 To Current Owner: Address: t �� S�r`�� .�;�� City Ordinance 199 requires that each existing on-site sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected every two yeazs. The on-site sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the categories checked below. YSTEM CONFORMITY 1-3 : � "CODE SYSTEM" An ISTS which meets all the location,design and construction standards of the cutrent Orono Municipal Code. 2 "COMPLIANT SYST'EM" An ISTS which does not meet all the location,design and construction standazds of the current Orono Municipal Code but does meet the three foot separation requirement or two foot requirement for systems installed 1996 or earlier,and which is not failing or an imminent threat to public health or safety. 3 "NON-COMPLIANT SYSTEM" A prohibited ISTS;an ISTS located within a designated 100-year flood plain,any ISTS which may or may not meet all the location,design,or construction stanc}ards of the current Orono Municipal Code and which is failing for any reason;and any ISTS with less than three feet of unsaturated soil or sand between the distribution device and the limiting soil characteristics. TANK CONDITION(5-7): b Tank inspection indicates: 5 Pumpout not needed at this time. �Septic tanks must be pumped out this year (city code recommends tanks to be pumped out once every 3 years. Tank was last pumped �S—Z� —6� )• Make sure septic tanks are pumped through manhole and not throu¢h white inspection pipes. This ailows for the proper cleaning Keep water softner and iron filter dischar¢e out of septic svstem to prolonS life of drainfield. A'sk aumper to test alarm float to verifv alarm is still workine in vour house The alarm warns owner that seata�e is about to backuo into basement. 7 Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. Inspection risers(4"dia.pipe)must be installed in each tank. If tanks have not been pumped out within the last three years,they should be pumped out now. D INF�LD CONDITION 8-10 : � 8 rainfield is dry,no surfacing evident. Some evidence of surfacing,not critical yet. 10 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact the City Inspector immediately.Repairs must be completed within 90 days. COMMENTS: 'I��-.�1� �a0� �� U� SCQ�'� ��.�s S,r�..,�.-� ��S _ � b ' ��p`4 �'��`�'`� ��`"�- Date of Inspection Matt Bolterman - Septic System Inspector votc: In the event that tliis inspection report is used to satisf� the requirements tbr a mortgage or other transfer of property�. be advised d�at this repuri du�s nu� �uarantee or certit\ that an existing system ��ill continue to fwution properl��, but is merel} an opinion of the adequac� oF the s�•stero under cw-rent �un�itiuns based on thz availablc inlonnation. �o� ,�%�O �A_ O � -�� y -� CITY o� ORONO �,',,a ;�, �j�`;� � \�'� r ��" �� 4 G�l� Munietpsl Oft3¢es �� \ ��, ��`�a`� Street Addross: M�ilin�Addrou: '�E+gg0�' 2150 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 July 12, 2000 Harry Stoker 465 Spring Hill Road Wayzata, MN 55391 - Dear Mr. Stoker: An inspection of your septic system was conducted on July 12, 2000. A summary of the inspection is below. Septic Tank Condition 1. Pumpout needed within one year. The septic system is a compliant system, meaning it meets all or most current City and State Standards. Enclosed is a list of licensed contractors who work in Orono on a regular basis. This list is enclosed simply for your reference in case your septic system needs maintenance in the future. Also enclosed is a fact sheet explaining your septic system and how it functions. Finally, an as-built drawing is enclosed showing the approximate location of the septic system. If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact me at the City Offices at 249-4600. Res ectful � �� 's Pence On-Site Systems Manager Enclosures In the event this inspection report is used to sutisfy the reyuiremcnts for:►mortb:ige or other transfer of property, be advised that this report does no guarantee or certify the esistinb s�-stem�vill continue to function properly,but is merely�n opinion of the adequacy of the system under current conditions I�used on the available information. This report must be kept on the premises with the s��stem loc.ition and pumping records. Telephone(952)249-4600 • Fax(952)249-4616 www.ci.orono.mn.us � o� 0 0 � ; }�� - y CITY of ORONO � ��a3�`.�� .��.'� I' v�,, `� ;� :'��, �" !S� Municipal Offices \'.�� Y ��7I�'��G~ Street Address: Mailin�Address: 9 ' '"' 4� $EggO 2150 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323•0066 Owner: � ' �'� Address: 465 Spring Hill Rd. Permit #'s: 9030 Dates: 6/1/87 Contractors: Sullivans (This is [�CJ an existing system ( ] new construction) . YSTEM COMPLIANCE (1-3) : 1 1 Code System: Meets or exceeds current City standards in all respects relating to design, construction, and location. Appears to be operating properly. 2 Compliant System: Does not meet all current City standards for new construction, but in most respects appears to be designed, located, and constructed in accordance with previous codes and is functioning properly. 3 Non-Compliant System: System may or may not meet current City standards for design, construction, or location, but is failing to properly treat and dispose of the current input; and any system with less than three feet of vertical separation between the bottom of the drainfield and the saturated soil level. (The saturated soil level is [x] or is not [ j identified under this aeptic system. If the saturated soil level is not identified, this classification is subject to revision.) K CONDITION (5-9) : 5 5 Pumpout not needed at this time. Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they should be pumped out this year. 7 System is discharging to the surface. Tanks must be pumped out within 48 hours. 8 Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. If tanks have not been pumped out within three years, they should be pumped out and risers installed now. 9 Inspection pipe is located over tank baffle-can not measure solids accumulation. If tanks have not been pumped out within three years, they should be pumped out now. 10 One or more tanks are cesspools, which means the septic system is non-compliant. (The tanks are [ ] or are not [ ] water tight or the condition is [' ] unknown. If the tanks are not confirmed to be watertight, this classification is subject to re ision.) DRAINFIELD CONDITION (11-14) : 11 1 Drainfield is dry, no surfacing evident. Some evidence of surfacing, not critical yet. Repair is not required at this time. 13 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact the City Inspector immediately. Repair must be completed within 90 days. 14 Drainfield extent and condition unknown. POTENTIAL FOR SYSTEM FAILURE: (system age and condition, soils, etc.) : low COMMENTS: In order to confirm that your septic system meets Minnesota standards, soil borings were performed to verify a 3 foot separation between the drainfield and the seasonal water table. The separation is 3 feet and the system is compliant. ��9� --'� , - -- Date of Inspection S ptic System Insp ctor Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a transfer of property, this report does not guarantee that an existing system will continue to function properly, but indicates the operation of the system under current conditions. Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510 CITY OF ORONO �O� Municipal Offices O O Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 � � ON—SITE SEWA(�E TRFA'1'�NT IN3PECTION REPORT ti ti ��k o4�G �sK Owner• Address• �� Y /! Permit #�'s: Dates: � — " 7 Contractors: "—/��//f��l/Y�'17� City ordinance nunber 100 requires that each on-site sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected on a regular basis. The on-site sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the category checked below. (This is ,J� an existing system [ ] new construction) SYSTEM CONFORMITY 1-3 : 1 "CODE SYSTEM�'-A system which meets all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City Codes, and which is operating satisfactorily by treating and disposing of the entire current sewage input without discharging any pollutants into ground or surface Waters. 2 "CONFORMING SYSTEM"-A system which does not meet all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City Codes, but was installed according to the code in effect at the time of installation, and which is operating satisfactorily by treating and disposing of the entire current sewage input without discharging any pollutants into ground or surface waters. 3 "NON-CONFORMING SYSTEM��-A prohibited system; a system located within a designated 100-year floodplain; any system which may or mey not meet all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City Codes and which is failing for any reason; and any_system with less than 3 feet of unsaturated soil or sand between the distribution device and the limiting sotl characteristics. (The limiting soil characteristic DU has or [ ] has not been identified at this time. If the limiting soil characteristic has not been identi'fie?l, this classification may be subject to revision.) TANK CONDITION (5-10): � inspection indicates: 5 Pumpout not needed at this time. Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they should be punped out this year to help prevent future problems. 7 Solids accunulation in tanks is at a critical level. Tanks should be punped out as soon as possible. 8 System is discharging to the surtece. 7anks must be punped out within 48 hours to eliminate surface dischar�e. 9 lnspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. Inspection risers (4" dia. pipe) must be instelled in each tank at next punpout. If tanks have not been punped out within the last three years, they should be punped out now. 10 Inspection pipe is located directly over tank baffle (does not give accurate measurement of solids eccumulation>. If tanks have not been pun�x�d out within the last three years, they should be pumped out now. DRAINFIELD CONDITION (11-14): D�e�field inspection indicates: V_]! Drainfie[d is dry, no surfecing evident. i2 Same evidence of surfacing, not critical yet. 13 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact the City Inspector immediately. Repairs must be completed within 90 days. 14 Drainfield extent and condition unknown. LIMITING SITE FACTORS Csloae,setbacks.etc.): POTENTIAL FOR SYSTEM FAILURE (decends on soils.water table,etc.): �, COMMENTS: Date of Inspection Sept' System Inspector Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a mortgage or other transfer of property, be advised that this report does not guarantee or certify that an existing system will continue to function properlyi but is merely an optnton of the adequacy of the system under current conditions based on the available informat�on. This report must be kept on the premises with the system locetion and pumping records. � WHITE COPY/Inapectors File YELLOW COPY/Homeowner CITY OF ORONO � O� Municipat Offices O O Post Office Box 66 Crystal eay, MN 55323-0066 � � ON—SITE SEWA(�E TREATt�NT � � INSPECTION REPORT 'C�� G~ 9kEs8o�'� Owner• � Address• T�� /�1m li��l /C/�/. Permit �'s: I�G Dates: '—' —O Contractors: !/�1��'1/�W� �,i��ii�/� City ordinance number 700 requires that each on-site sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected on a regular basis. The on-site sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the category checked below. (This is �- an existing system [ ] new construction) SYSTEM CONFORMITY C1-3): 1 "CODE SYSTEM"-A system which meets all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City Codes, and which is operating satisfactorily by treating and disposing of the entire current sewage input without discharging any pollutants into ground or surface waters. 2 "CONFORMING SYSTEM"-A system which does not meet all the (ocation, design, and construction standards of the current City Codes, but was installed according to the code in effect at the time of installation, and which is operating satisfactorily by treating and disposing of the entire current sewage input without discharging any pollutants into ground or surface waters. 3 ��NON-CONFORMING SYSTEM"-A prohibited system; a system located within a designated 100-year floodplain; any system which may or may not meet all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City Codes and which is failing for any reason; and any system with less than 3 feet of unsaturated soil or sand between the distribution device and the limiting soil characteristics. (The limiting soil characteristic � has or [ ] has not been identified at this time. If the limiting soil characteristic has not been identi ied, this classification may be subject to revision.) TANK CONDITION C5-10): Tank inspection indicates: Punpout not needed at this time. Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they should be pumped out this year to help prevent future problems. Solids accunulation in tanks is at a critical level. 'fanks should be punped out as soon as possible. 8 System is discharging to the surface. Tanks must be punped out within 48 hours to eliminate surface dischar$e. 9 Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. lnspection risers (4" dia. pipe) must be installed in each tank at next �xnpout. [f tanks have not been punped out within the last three years, they should be punped OUL r10M. 10 Inspection pipe is located directly over tank baffle (does not give accurate measurement of solids accunulation>. If tanks have not been punped out within the last three years, they should be pumped out now. DRAINFIELD CONDITION (11-14): Dr field inspection indicates:. Drainfield is dry, no surfacing evident. 2 Some evidence of surfacing, not critical yet. 13 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact the City Inspector immediately. Repairs must be canpleted within 90 days. 14 Drainfield extent and condition unknown. LIMITING SITE FACTORS (sloae,setbacks,etc.): �a� POTENTIAL FOR SYSTEM FAILURE Cdeoends on soils.water table,etc.): � COMMENTS: Date of Inspection ptic System Inspector Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a mortgage or other transfer of property, be advised that this report does not guarantee or certify that an existing system will continue to function properlyi but is merely an opim on of the adequacy of the system under current conditions based on the available information. This report must be kept on the premises with the system locetion and punping records. WHITE COPY/Inspectors File YELLOW COPY/Homeowner