Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWetland Delineation Report 5 � RECEIVED ORii" wit° copy JAN 2 4 7018 U►Y Ur URONO 1795 Fox Street Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota Wetland Delineation Report Prepared for Patrick Dorn Construction by Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company, Inc. (KES Project No. 2017-167) October 17, 2017 1795 Fox Street Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota Wetland Delineation Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Title Page 1. WETLAND DELINEATION SUMMARY 1 2. OVERVIEW 2 3. METHODS 2 3.1 Wetland Delineation 2 4. RESULTS 3 4.1 Review of NWI, Soils, Public Waters and NHD Information 3 4.2 Wetland Determination and Delineation 4 4.4 Request for Wetland Boundary and Jurisdictional Determination 5 5. CERTIFICATION OF DELINEATION 5 TABLES Table I. Soil types mapped on the 1795 Fox Street Property 4 FIGURES 1. Site Location 2. Existing Conditions Overview 3. National Wetlands Inventory 4. Soil Survey 5. DNR Public Waters Inventory 6. National Hydrography Dataset 7. MCWD Wetland Classifications APPENDICES A. Joint Application Form for Activities Affecting Water Resources in Minnesota B. Hydric Soil List—All Components C. Wetland Delineation Data Forms D. Precipitation Data E. Previous Wetland Boundary Survey 1795 Fox Street Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota Wetland Delineation Report 1. WETLAND DELINEATION SUMMARY • The 28.22-acre property at 1795 Fox Street in Orono was inspected on September 27, 2017 for the presence and extent of wetland. • The National Wetlands Inventory(NWI) map showed a large PEM1C/PABG wetland within the site boundaries. • The soil survey showed hydric and partially hydric soil types on the site included Muskego, Blue Earth, and Houghton soils and Hamel overwash-complex. • The DNR Public Waters Inventory showed DNR Public Waters Wetland 27-859W and a DNR Public Watercourse located on the site. • The National Hydrography Dataset showed a Lake/Pond in the location of the DNR Public Watercourse. • One Type 3 PEMC shallow marsh was delineated on the property. The wetland is dominated by cattails and covers approximately 24.59 acres within the site. 1 1795 Fox Street Wetland Delineation Report 2. OVERVIEW The 28.22-acre property at 1795 Fox Street was inspected on September 27, 2017 for the presence and extent of wetland. The property was located in the SW 'A of Section 3 and the NW ''A of Section 10, Township 117 North, Range 23 West, City of Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota. The site was situated at the end of an 830-foot long cul-de-sac that extends south off of Fox Street from a point 0.75 mile west of Shoreline Drive (CSAH 15) (Figure 1). The property corresponded to Hennepin County PID 03-117-23-44-0006. The site included part of a large shallow marsh dominated by cattails with a fringe of reed canary grass. The cattail marsh curved around a partially wooded upland peninsula with green ash, common buckthorn, black walnut, and white cedar, and some grassland dominated by orchard grass, Kentucky bluegrass, and smooth brome. The large cattail marsh is DNR Public Waters Wetland 27-859W and it includes a DNR Public Watercourse that drains southeast toward Tanager Lake. Site topography was highest near the center of the peninsula at 946 feet above msl, and lowest in the wetland at an elevation of about 930. The property was bordered on the southeast by the Hennepin County Regional Trail, on the west by cattail marsh, on the north by unoccupied residential lots, and on the east by cattail marsh. One wetland was delineated within the site boundaries. The delineated wetland boundaries and existing conditions are shown on Figure 2. The property also included a stormwater pond that was constructed in 2009, the same year that the cul-de-sac was constructed. Appendix A of this report includes a Joint Application Form for Activities Affecting Water Resources in Minnesota, which is submitted in request for: (1) a wetland boundary and type determination under the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA), and (2) delineation concurrence and a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations (PJD) under Section 404 of the Federal Clean Water Act. 3. METHODS 3.1 Wetland Delineation Wetlands were identified using the Routine Determination method described in the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (Waterways Experiment Station, 1987) and the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Midwest Region (Version 2.0) as required under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act. Wetland boundaries were identified as the upper-most extent of wetland that met criteria for hydric soils, hydrophytic vegetation, and wetland hydrology. Wetland-upland boundaries were marked with pin flags that will be located by Gronberg& Associates Land Surveyors. Approximate wetland boundaries shown on Figure 2 are based on a previous wetland 2 1795 Fox Street Wetland Delineation Report delineation that was located by Gronberg&Associates. This wetland boundary survey will be updated when the new wetland boundary flags are located. Soils, vegetation, and hydrology were documented at a representative location along the wetland- upland boundary. Plant species dominance was estimated based on the percent aerial or basal coverage visually estimated within a 30-foot radius for trees and vines, a 15-foot radius for the shrub layer, and a 5-foot radius for the herbaceous layer within the community type sampled. Soils were characterized to a minimum depth of 24 inches(unless otherwise noted) using a Munsell Soil Color Book and standard soil texturing methodology. Hydric soil indicators used are from Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States (USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) in cooperation with the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils, Version 7, 2010). Mapped soils are separated into five classes based on the composition of hydric components and the Hydric Rating by Map Unit color classes utilized on Web Soil Survey. The five classes include Hydric (100 % hydric components), Predominantly hydric (66-99 %hydric components), Partially hydric (33-65 %hydric components), Predominantly non-hydric (1-32 % hydric components), and Non-hydric (< 1%hydric components). Plants were identified using standard regional plant keys. Taxonomy and indicator status of plant species was taken from the 2016 National Wetland Plant List (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 2016. National Wetland Plant List, version 3.3, Engineer Research and Development Center, Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Hanover,NH). 4. RESULTS 4.1 Review of NWI, Soils, Public Waters and NHD Information The National Wetlands Inventory(N WI) (Minnesota Geospatial Commons 2009-2014 and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) showed a large PEM1C/PABG wetland within the property boundaries (Figure 3). The Soil Survey (USDA NRCS 2015) showed predominantly hydric and hydric and soil types on the properties included Muskego, Blue Earth, and Houghton soils; and Hamel overwash- complex. Soil types mapped on the property are listed in Table 1 and a map showing soil types is included in Figure 4. The Hydric Soil List—All Components is included in Appendix B. The Minnesota DNR Public Waters inventory (Minnesota Department ofNatural Resources 2015) showed DNR Public Waters Wetland 27-859W and a DNR Public Watercourse located on the site(Figure 5). The National Hvdrography Dataset (U.S. Geological Survey 2015) showed a Lake/Pond in the location of the DNR Public Watercourse (Figure 6). 3 1795 Fox Street Wetland Delineation Report The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) Wetland Inventory showed a Manage 1 wetland located on property(Figure 7). The MCWD requires a minimum buffer width of 34 feet on this wetland. Table 1. Soil types mapped on the 1795 Fox Street Property €Y0 of Symbol Soil Name Acres Area Hydric Hydric Category L16A Muskego, Blue Earth,and Houghton 21.02 74.5 100 Hydric soils,ponded,0-1%slopes L36A Hamel,overwash-Hamel complex, 0.14 0.5 45 Partially hydric 0-3%slopes L41 D2 Lester-Kilkenny complex, 12-18% 2.85 10.1 5 Predominantly non-hydric slopes,eroded W Water 4.21 14.9 -- -- Totals 28.22 100.0 4.2 Wetland Determination and Delineation One wetland was identified and delineated on the property during field observations on September 27, 2017 (Figure 2). Data forms are included in Appendix C. The following wetland and upland descriptions reflect conditions observed at the time of the field visit. Some herbaceous vegetation was actively growing, while other species were beginning to senesce, and leaves were still present on trees and shrubs. Precipitation conditions were within normal range based on the 3-month antecedent weighted average, and below the normal range based on the 30- day rolling total precipitation (Appendix D). Approximate wetland boundaries are shown on Figure 2. These boundaries are based on a previous wetland delineation that was located by Gronberg&Associates Land Surveyors. The previous Wetland Boundary Survey is included as Appendix E. This survey will be updated after the new wetland boundary flags are located. Wetland and wetland boundary characteristics are summarized below. Wetland 1 was a Type 3 (PEMC) shallow marsh that covered most of the property. The wetland was dominated by narrowleaf cattail with a fringe of reed canary grass and some willow. The wetland covered approximately 24.59 acres within the property boundary and had obvious surface saturation. The adjacent upland was dominated by common buckthorn, green ash, and white cedar with grassland dominated by orchard grass, smooth brome, and Kentucky bluegrass. The wetland boundary mostly corresponded to an increase in elevation and transition from reed canary grass in the wetland to common buckthorn on the upland. The wetland is shown on the NWI map as a PEM I C/PABG wetland and mapped as Muskego, Blue Earth, and Houghton soils (hydric) on the soil survey. The Minnesota Public Waters Inventory shows the wetland as DNR Public Waters Wetland 27-859W and a DNR Public Watercourse drains from northwest to southeast through the site on its way to Tanager Lake and Lake Minnetonka. 4 • 1795 Fox Street Wetland Delineation Report The property also included a stormwater pond that was constructed in Lester-Kilkenny complex soils(predominantly non-hydric soils)to treat runoff from the cul-de-sac, which was constructed on upland (Figure 2). The cul-de-sac and stormwater pond were both constructed in 2009. No other areas were observed to have hydrophytic vegetation, shown as hydric soils on the soil survey, or depicted as wetland on the NWI map. 4.4 Request for Wetland Boundary and Jurisdictional Determination Appendix A of this report includes a Joint Application Form for Activities Affecting Water Resources in Minnesota, which is submitted in request for: (1) a wetland boundary and type determination under the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA), and(2) delineation concurrence and a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations (PJD) under Section 404 of the Federal Clean Water Act. 5. CERTIFICATION OF DELINEATION The procedures utilized in the described delineation are based on the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 1987 Wetlands Delineation Manual as required under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act. This wetland delineation and report were prepared in compliance with the regulatory standards in place at the time the work was performed. Site boundaries indicated on figures within this report are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. Delineation completed by: Rob Bouta, Senior Ecologist MN Certified Wetland Delineator No. 1081 Report reviewed by: l Date: October 17, 2017 Mark Kjolhaug, Professional Wetland Scientist No. 000845 5 1795 Fox Street Wetland Delineation Report FIGURES 1. Site Location 2. Existing Conditions Overview 3. National Wetlands Inventory 4. Soil Survey 5. DNR Public Waters Inventory 6. National Hydrography Dataset 7. MCWD Wetland Classifications • a '- y_ �. CR c, : ' ;.,�; Cly cis E • a e Ear Y 3\\ ‘\ \ ai x r ©'OpenStreetlN'a (and)contnbut�rs CC BY SAS Figure 1 - Site Location N 0 1,500 1795 Fox Street(ICES 2017-167) \\,yf Orono,Minnesota A luri Feet Project Boundary Note:Boundaries indicated on ... �`T LI T Tly this figure are approximate l L,J LHA G ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY and do not constitute an �w �1�/ Source:ESRI Streets Basemap official survey product. ,„ gam+ p � i $ wil Z � � •960 (71(C,,,,.!‘!,:':-..„-°. ' ', " ' jg �� 4 �� 9S .µ f 1 (\ i� `.t 9s� --i- 4.;,,,,,:•,, ` te\,...,,,,,,..,:,:\,... .... (,------, i ,� . ", '°�'? 'll� � j� � %t''''''-;'`..- 30 � , •` �° -„,-,:`,.:--,‘,(c? °� 96?-17. _ � �`�� >� i,- � � � a`n� �(� � ' " ,y0._,_. ps''ab .- v^' .+} % jj j.1 .✓ ;� �,., r _ ;Is? -` , It 940 / ,, -‘,.,:„...,. ,..-,,,,--;.,--..t---7> ,,s r ,,. _ , - „ � asp-" _ ` {�.i -oft f , 1, ,-,. ( ,‘ 1 '�i .. ,0,, -' ,,, C z ��, .fid ��_ lyfiXi . r'�i�, , Y._ f. �ma!y, ti�J` qa _ iwr� a,w ,„ II oi , , ,,,..0 ,,,. , l��;{f 2vv fes.- � L-"^« -„.. ''''';•\,,, q'y`..' � {� �` � et :,,--._".�o✓`�� �� � v'-�+\/ � '(l�A� 1'x � _ I ��Via: - .. �'_� ^ `� �„ -,,,, ���§ g'�� � � � gA0 -.�� � � ` ,.. ” ° ..w , = ,e � w 95040 `6j' . ,., --- „, ‹0:,;- - 111 � • _ ,.-a„�+"...a' /�O ...,J-1-:;;;; � t "` § Fps '11 �{,E j ,.� pi.f:'".a;:':�r �1 `.«ua 4 .,,,' gt �� � "6� " � f , s'I• • �� 4��� ��a�6 f � ; 4;!:,;),,„,,e ' yet f 7j��� � � �'.S� �� � -.4'.`t-' �� ' P { �" .. �a`p�'bau... �13, �,Wg`' � .y- \� L �q \ "d �,„.'=„,.,.,,..-,,, ,,,,,„„..i.,. � 4�,°` `1••`�"yv{ `Y � � '. 'p^. �� ����� �"� � ' ,t. 4...�-- �< .. ', {' p a �., 4.oy� `�� e� `_�� �A '.a� � Era t.. ��r •., €d f x E F ASO � .,.._ � �a 1� �'� � � O:� ��, � '� . :� 9 �Wetland 1 � � � � �� , � � � � �� � �r � A , % , ` 'covers^'24.59 acres � �.,., a .� -... � � to � a\ � • � �I. 6 - �} ° within site ,.14t1( ,,,,,:°-1 ' Figure 2 - Existing Conditions N A0 400 Project Boundary 1795 Fox Street(KES 2017-167) ' I I Orono,Minnesota ���.��� Feet Transect y1 Note:Boundaries indicated on T u�TT Approximate Wetland Boundary this figure are approximate J�L1111V ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY and do not constitute an .•�...�,, So���e:Minnesota DN,(2013) Hennepin County Lidar off7cial suryey product. �y ; .• .F.},.'�, x.sr`a�'.tr'<, '`c !r�':ti">",,;•':" "". - (MOP .. -- ,' �ii< .< ,•r _ ,�".7; ,,.,,� it;° • PABG OM .moi,4t440004*1 °" 1W x MOB mow.. ' ,..::„. �: ;' �'��, ;�d . �..`R'3 .,_ v ,,tai •�.. i” •* ": <•,it; e` GIMP " , • 4, '•• „ '•=4','' ','‘ ' --:tt,„,,, ,;‘,t,..• '.4ezz's4.,4 , • •:, - • 4' ,41;.,+, ' \ ' -.4...v,t;'''e'i: '','''-.*-14trir'omw**'-v,,,, 4;1: ,,>4ot:.•-•„ "„i>.'„ , ' _vrIkkek ,.; h Mx: �': '4. NY L2ABH ., 'AktfitK. '�''�.' .�' <., >,r:; ,,,, ,„,,. ,‘,,)%142' 4+4,,k`x '` .`;'•, . '�',£",l, :x tx04 . n,`.�i”• ' r � ,r.:,.�,<,i.i^,• ,L\ ,•N• > u:4 =Y,•< - � . K>�h i�%i R.:..,`e:,p'c :: ,i. x •. •t. •.,, - .a .: �x� i` s‘s •ra 'l � �� :-ate, .,�i� :e: �� ._. '�!' •� �\XY'� "�< e` .��i?� `E was... ^.� moi,. f ,,�'< Zai 'i' s �\',a ,c.Y,. »NSP ' p �:'_; t ` a `s < is^` j`�.* V. ^j<,. C•' .R a fit .3. .�,Si •P��' •'•3a�'^,>>r� , Vitt . ., ,�, >r . �-. _'� y ��. F!iaa %�< ?'.,v'?[q,C;. ., < ;•' _ :�`.y.'y!-3i, � � c���,"o .\� aW\ ` xx��,, „ ,,...,,,:‘,„,:1, 1.1 ,� "E3' .iii., ai , fiz1 a” 3:sr F "c ° .x 2, �Z,K, _'' ., • . ..y. \«3+'? _ • '.Y" �; 4. ' „ti st.. •a'mss:. •: ,r` , �l4... yr > �.r�i . ��` „ .�._:;, -.� 'L2UBH `�� ?, �a t' .,pan .2p .S�,.<� . aJ':. ;r•. ,.< a: M Figure 3 - National Wetlands Inventory 1795 Fox Street(ICES 2017-167) �� I I Orono,Minnesota N 0 400 4A Feet -- ,� Note:Boundaries indicated on II TTG this figure are approximate LTIA ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY and do not constitute an T .18.—w ^.,ter Source:Minnesota DNR(2013),usFws official survey product. , L22D2; 2 Y Y 1D2J -K. D �, . e LF22C2' or!::%‘1" Y Y L41D2• . OEM Elli ' • A 4 - - . ,it I. e. L22D2 ,�.. i. eall ; l L22D2 Seenarrative,forsoil seriesn ' L7oD2 nar information lik. ikm Figure 4 - Soil Survey • N 0 400 1795 Fox Street(KES 2017-167) Hydric/Predominantly Hydric Orono,Minnesota ;rr. I Feet Partially Hydric Note:Boundaries indicated on t this figure are approximate I%jOLHAUIT ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY Predominantly Non Hydric/Non Hydric and do not constitute an �w ^1�,/ Source:USDA,MRCS official survey product. s` • I Unnamed (27 862 W) Unn med (278 61 W)Ju "° Unnamed (27 855 W) Unnamed (27-855 W) �.. calk ': Unnamed (27 855 W) French Marsh (North) (27-140-01 �a •„ r ; �' ' � .. •,.;,.•-„.'-s-- French Unnamed (27 855 W) @,� ' ym.' y �'• x� �' • d (27 859 W) \ U g .. Unnamed (27 864 W) \� illoot '° � � � ' Minnetonka=Lower Lake(27-133-02 P) • . � Tanager(27 141 .. ji , to. ,„,,,.,. .. , ., , ., ., , . Unnamed (27-865 W) Unname(7 865 W) Figure 5 — DNR Public Waters Inventory N 0 600 1795 Fox Street(KES 2017-167) �,�. i Orono, Minnesota `.,_ Feet Public Watercourse Note:Boundaries indicated on s �(' T v�TT/r Public Waters this figure are approximate 1 LJ�1 111 lJ ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY and do not constitute an tiv Source:Minnesota DNR official survey product. NIucI"i: - l j:. : a � � � 114 s'4i, / / v •"_ ._ % bs. Figure 6 - National Hydrography Dataset 0 600 1795 Fox Street(KES 2017-167) �r? I o Hydro Junction - Connector Orono,Minnesota `�; I Feet A - Artificial Path - Stream/River Note:Boundaries indicated of I4Jozu T u TT/� this figure are approximate xAUG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY - Canal/Ditch CT Lake/Pond and do not constitute an ► .� �.... source:oscs official survey product. '''':47'lLiitti.c'-g.'-.".':.:‘,,'„' :;k:41:::,....". 1*,' ,.(;'' tvf. lis . • Vi• '`<w.; . • sk`S, a , '•S ^[� ' .• • • `.#t , -, •. • i - ,'eI* ri '_ .. .ft1W7:-.-...."'..'1 v• IT't % Itr • • irk • • ' ^ t 'ii � '£ � ' • x 'i �• � � 4,11...>- • < � V �" -� '' ��,• j., . •:!Z. a � .i '•<a: e= `" .:��-'` � . :.< �'',�:.:A's � <A ,'`tekz3' �': N "� s� .� .N' ' • '� : •' � �'_ y.'' •x, � � �` „� : ' i.a," � 'r` ` g*s , � • ,tC"-" • :1,p� . � <" ma ' •4 .t: \i�". "'� .L;.., Z " ) 'ir' ::�€V."� • ��� '` 1:a.,ii »..' • : � k.'. ..; ,i a mss- r<r ,e ; � '� � E£ c. A ' t ` � : } : •, c '8f _ ; .'A. <�, " �r _ :-.1,4,-,s1,', :,J � YW : i�; :' �t _�..i.n.:; '\n .''�w«•a , � . : "� �,•.y. � '° s><,-. ..Y«, ;:11, ; ��•. .. . 7Lr. '4. '1,-. v� 12'.;!., ;'''' > ' ,'• n''':4'b ^i'�' .''ri ! �T' Y'A, � H t :�. , r«.;t\ r- r' fs >v':.• r^ fir,'. .", ,-,;:*:V;,, :'``,. :':::47i7,!1:,:;,-..4•:.."' '.4,4t .":'. ,:;, : . .4,4 \ ,c:' -' t. ,,,,,,,,'4 ,'N:=',' '''''‘'''''• 0. ....4.• ki:;!' 4. • 6. L. •.,-;,,t ,..- - -1-lo , .0 , , ,..„,,, ,„,,..e.„,,..,,,-,, ,„4„.• • ..4.-„Itr. it -., ,k,;..i.,•.--,,,,,,,?,,-„ ;,.„6,,,-,:-,-,,, . ti., , , , , .... .,.t.... . ., 44.4,:k , 1.„‘44,...%:..,,t,t,,,,..1.• '','-,,,;- ' ;', ..., •C' ,i - 4 v::,:. .•''*;;:i -• v .*,,,..7 , , lmoi.\'Y3{'.✓'Y . WV'k,. .,. .�• ';i M;= 1 r: Management Class ... r . ' rx � .�. ' ' Manage 1 tie . is • `. r„ :.: ° : Manage 2 ', ^ ',n :`' ;•'"fir "moi. :-,,,\-::::.'''2,,,,,-,.- d ''''.4:3f:"''' . :. mv . • ma:,>r:r Not Classified ,,: yfypq ,. ` Preserve Figure 7 - MCWD Wetland Classifications N 0 400 1795 Fox Street(ICES 2017-167) 4i:� Orono,Minnesota A Nr::::=1 Feet ' s-- tNote:Boundaries indicated on T u T Thr this figure are approximate il ►w KJOL1111V lT ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES COMPANY and do not constitute an .0.0•• Source:MWCD official survey product. 1795 Fox Street Wetland Delineation Report APPENDIX A Joint Application Form for Activities Affecting Water Resources in Minnesota Project Name and/or Number: 1795 Fox Street Joint Application Form for Activities Affecting Water Resources in Minnesota PART ONE: Applicant Information If applicant is an entity(company,government entity,partnership,etc.),an authorized contact person must be identified. If the applicant is using an agent(consultant,lawyer,or other third party)and has authorized them to act on their behalf,the agent's contact information must also be provided. Project Name: 1795 Fox Street Applicant/Landowner Name: Thomas Hamilton Mailing Address: 1795 Fox Street,Orono,MN 55391 Phone: E-mail Address: tom.hamilton'a;ictg.com Authorized Contact(do not complete if same as above): Pat Dorn,Patrick Dorn Construction Mailing Address: 19165 81st Place North,Maple Grove,MN 5531 Phone: (612)801-6453 E-mail Address: pat ci-pdcmn.com Agent Name: Rob Bouta,Kjolhaug Environmental Services Co. Mailing Address: 2500 Shadywood Road,Suite 130,Orono,MN 55331 Phone: (612)581-0546 E-mail Address: RobB a kjolhau<_Lenv.com PART TWO: Site Location Information County: Hennepin County City/Township: City of Orono Parcel ID and/or Address: PID 03-117-23-44-0006 Address: 1795 Fox Street,Orono,MN 55391 Legal Description(Section,Township,Range): SW 1/4 Sec.3 and NW 1/4 Sec. 10,TI I 7N,R23W Lat/Long(decimal degrees): 44.964367,-93.567281 Attach a map showing the location of the site in relation to local streets,roads,highways. See attached. Approximate size of site(acres)or if a linear project,length(feet): 28.22 acres If you know that your proposal will require an individual Permit from the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers,you must provide the names and addresses of all property owners adjacent to the project site. This information may be provided by attaching a list to your application or by using block 25 of the Application for Department of the Army permit which can be obtained at: http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/Portals/57/docs/regulatory/ReguiatoryDocs/engform 4345 2012oct.pdf PART THREE: General Project/Site Information If this application is related to a delineation approval,exemption determination,jurisdictional determination,or other correspondence submitted prior to this application then describe that here and provide the Corps of Engineers project number. Describe the project that is being proposed,the project purpose and need,and schedule for implementation and completion.The project description must fully describe the nature and scope of the proposed activity including a description of all project elements that effect aquatic resources(wetland, lake,tributary,etc.)and must also include plans and cross section or profile drawings showing the location,character,and dimensions of all proposed activities and aquatic resource impacts. A new home is proposed for construction on the site. Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 1 of 3 Project Name and/or Number: 1795 Fox Street PART FOUR: Aquatic Resource Impacts Summary If your proposed project involves a direct or indirect impact to an aquatic resource (wetland, lake, tributary, etc.) identify each impact in the table below.Include all anticipated impacts,including those expected to be temporary.Attach an overhead view map, aerial photo,and/or drawing showing all of the aquatic resources in the project area and the location(s)of the proposed impacts. Label each aquatic resource on the map with a reference number or letter and identify the impacts in the following table. Aquatic Aquatic Type of Duration of Overall Size Resource Impact(fill, Size of Existing Plant Resource ID(as Impact2 of Aquatic County, Watershed,& noted on Type(wetland, excavate,drain, Impact a Community Type(5)In Permanent(P)or Resource Bank Service Area s overhead view) lake,tributary Or remove Temporary(r)3 (acres) (acres) Impact Area etc.} vegetation) Hennepin County; Wetland 1 Wetland NA INA NA 24.59 Shallow marsh Watershed 20(Mississippi River,Metro);BSA 7 Total NA 24.59 'If impacts are temporary;enter the duration of the impacts in days next to the"r".For example,a project with a temporary access fill that would be removed after 220 days would be entered'T 1220)". 'Impacts less than 0.01 acre should be reported in square feet. Impacts 0.01 acre or greater should be reported as acres and rounded to the nearest 0.01 acre.Tributary impacts must be reported in linear feet of impact and an area of impact by indicating first the linear feet of impact along the flowline of the stream followed by the area impact in parentheses).For example,a project that impacts 50 feet of a stream that is 6 feet wide would be reported as SO ft(300 square feet). ''this is generally only applicable if you are applying for a de minimis exemption under MN Rules 8420.0420 Subp.8,otherwise enter"N/A". *Use Wetland Plants and Plant Community Types of Minnesota and Wisconsin 3'a.Ed.as modified in MN Rules 8420.0405 Subp.2. 'Refer to Major Watershed and Sank Service Area maps in MN Rules 8420.0522 Subp,7. If any of the above identified impacts have already occurred,identify which impacts they are and the circumstances associated with each: No impacts have occurred. PART FIVE: Applicant Signature 0 Check here if you are requesting a pre-application consultation with the Corps and LGU based on the information you have provided. Regulatory entities will not initiate a formal application review if this box is checked. By signature below,I attest that the information in this application is complete and accurate. I further attest that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein. Signature: gW` ts `".' Date: \O/i')/ dO) I hereby authorize Kjolhaug Environmental Services to act on my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to furnish,upon request,supplemental information in support of this application. 1 The term"impact"as used in this joint application form is a generic term used for disclosure purposes to identify activities that may require approval from one or more regulatory agencies, For purposes of this form it is not meant to indicate whether or not those activities may require mitigation/replacement. Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 2 of 3 Project Name and/or Number: 1795 Fox Street Attachment A Request for Delineation Review, Wetland Type Determination, or Jurisdictional Determination By submission of the enclosed wetland delineation report, I am requesting that the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers,St.Paul District (Corps)and/or the Wetland Conservation Act Local Government Unit(LGU)provide me with the following(check all that apply): ®Wetland Type Confirmation ®Delineation Concurrence. Concurrence with a delineation is a written notification from the Corps and a decision from the LGU concurring,not concurring,or commenting on the boundaries of the aquatic resources delineated on the property.Delineation concurrences are generally valid for five years unless site conditions change. Under this request alone,the Corps will not address the jurisdictional status of the aquatic resources on the property,only the boundaries of the resources within the review area (including wetlands,tributaries, lakes,etc.). Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination.A preliminary jurisdictional determination(PJD)is a non-binding written indication from the Corps that waters, including wetlands,identified on a parcel may be waters of the United States.For purposes of computation of impacts and compensatory mitigation requirements,a permit decision made on the basis of a PJD will treat all waters and wetlands in the review area as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. PJDs are advisory in nature and may not be appealed. n Approved Jurisdictional Determination.An approved jurisdictional determination(AJD)is an official Corps determination that jurisdictional waters of the United States are either present or absent on the property.AJDs can generally be relied upon by the affected party for five years.An AJD may be appealed through the Corps administrative appeal process. In order for the Corps and LGU to process your request,the wetland delineation must be prepared in accordance with the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual,any approved Regional Supplements to the 1987 Manual,and the Guidelines for Submitting Wetland Delineations in Minnesota(2013). http://www.mvp.usace.army.miljMissions/Regulatory/DelineationJDGuidance.aspx Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 3 of 3 1795 Fox Street Wetland Delineation Report APPENDIX B Hydric Soil List—All Components Hydric Soil List-All Components---Hennepin County,Minnesota 1795 Fox Street,Orono,Minnesota Report—Hydric Soil List - All Components Hydric Soil List-All Components-MN053-Hennepin County,Minnesota Map symbol and map unit name ComponentlLocal Comp. Landform Hydric Hydric criteria met Phase pct. stag (code) L16A:Muskego,Blue Earth,and Muskego-Ponded 0-100 Marshes on moraines Yes 1,3 Houghton soils,ponded,0 to 1 percent slopes t hton-Ponded t 100 ;MarshOft rnoralirisis Yes 1'3- Blue Earth-Ponded 0-100 Marshes on moraines Yes 2,3 • Klo P tded 0-20 iMershes on moral ;Yes 1,3 L22E:Lester loam, 10 to 22 Lester 75-90 Moraines,hillslopes No — percent slopes Storden-Moderately 5-15 Ground des 1'14t Lester 3-5 Ground No — moraines,hillslopes Tarr'" 2-5 Ground mora No.: L36A:Hamel,overwash-Hamel Hamel-Overwash 40-60 Ground moraines No complex,0 to 3 percent slopes Hamel Ground rr ra` Yes 2 Terril 0-10 Ground moraines No — 0-5 Depressions Yes 2 r z L41D2:Lester-Kilkenny complex, Lester-Eroded 40-50 Hills on moraines No — ._.._._.. 12 to 18 percent slopes,eroded Kilicenrty-Eroded 25-45 I Hills on moraines „ No Terril 5-15 Hills on moraines No — " Ridg t 0-10 = Hills on moraines -- Derrynane 2-10 Drainageways on Yes 2 ._" moraines W:Water Water 100 — Data Source Information Soil Survey Area: Hennepin County, Minnesota Survey Area Data: Version 12, Sep 19, 2016 t75c, Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/12/2017 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 1 1795 Fox Street Wetland Delineation Report APPENDIX C Wetland Delineation Data Forms WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Midwest Region Project/Site 1795 Fox Street City/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: 9/27/2017 Applicant/Owner: Thomas Hamilton State: MN Sampling Point: 1-1 Up Investigator(s): R.Bouta(WDC#1081) Section,Township,Range: Sections 3 and 10,T117N,R23W Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Slope Local relief(concave,convex,none): Linear Slope(%): 15-20 Lat: 44.964367 Long: -93.567281 Datum: Digital degrees Soil Map Unit Name Lester-Kilkenny complex(predominantly non-hydric) VWI Classification: None Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no,explain in remarks) Are vegetation ,soil ,or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances" Are vegetation ,soil ,or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed,explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? N Hydric soil present? N Is the sampled area within a wetland? N Indicators of wetland hydrology present? N yes, optional wetland site ID: Remarks:(Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Precipitation was within normal range based on 3-month antecedent weighted average, and below the normal range based on the 30-day rolling total precipitation. VEGETATION-- Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominan Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30-ft radius ) %Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 20 Y FACW that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 2 (A) 2 Juglans nigra 20 Y FACU Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 4 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 50.00% (A/B) 40 =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum (Plot size: 15-ft radius ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 FACU Total%Cover of: 2 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 3 FACW species 20 x 2= 40 4 FAC species 95 x 3= 285 5 FACU species 65 x 4= 260 0 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 5-ft radius ) Column totals 180 (A) 585 (B) 1 Poa pratensis 95 Y FAC Prevalence Index=B/A= 3.25 2 Dactylis glomerate 40 Y FACU 3 Hackelia virginiana 5 N FACU Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 Dominance test is>50% 6 Prevalence index is 55-3.0* 7 Morphogical adaptations*(provide 8 supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* 140 =Total Cover (explain) Woody vine stratum (Plot size. 30-ft radius ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 1 present,unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic 0 =Total Cover vegetation present? N Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: 1-1 Up Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type* Loc** Texture Remarks 0-14 10YR 3/1 100 - - Loam 14-27 2.5Y 3/3 100 - - Loam *Type:C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol(Al) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K, L,R) Histic Epipedon(A2) Sandy Redox(S5) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K, L) Black Histic(A3) Stripped Matrix(S6) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L, R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Stratified Layers(A5) -Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Other(explain in remarks) -2 cm Muck(A10) Depleted Matrix(F3) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Redox Dark Surface(F6) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) -Depleted Dark Surface(F7) `Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or -5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) problematic Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: - Hydric soil present? N Depth(inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required) Surface Water(Al) Aquatic Fauna(B13) Surface Soil Cracks(B6) High Water Table(A2) -True Aquatic Plants(B14) Drainage Patterns(B10) Saturation(A3) -Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(B1) -Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Crayfish Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(B2) Roots(C3) -Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(133) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) -Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(B5) (C6) -FAC-Neutral Test(D5) —Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) —Thin Muck Surface(C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) Gauge or Well Data(D9) Water-Stained Leaves(B9) -Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Water table present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes No X Depth(inches): hydrology present? N (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos, previous inspections),if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Midwest Region Project/Site 1795 Fox Street City/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: 9/27/2017 Applicant/Owner: Thomas Hamilton State: MN Sampling Point: 1-1 Wet Investigator(s): R.Bouta(WDC#1081) Section,Township, Range: Sections 3 and 10,T117N, R23W Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Basin Local relief(concave,convex, none): Concave to Flat Slope(%): 0-5 Lat: 44.964367 Long: -93.567281 Datum: Digital degrees Soil Map Unit Name Muskego, Blue Earth,and Houghton(hydric) VWI Classification: PEM1C/PABG Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? Y (If no,explain in remarks) Are vegetation ,soil ,or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances" Are vegetation ,soil ,or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed,explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetland? Y Indicators of wetland hydrology present? Y F yes,optional wetland site ID: Wetland 1 Remarks:(Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) Precipitation was within normal range based on 3-month antecedent weighted average, and below the normal range based on the 30-day rolling total precipitation. VEGETATION-- Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominan Indicator Dominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30-ft radius ) %Cover t Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 Fraxinus pennsylvanica 40 Y FACW that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 2 (A) 2 Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 2 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100.00% (A/B) 40 =Total Cover Sapling/Shrub stratum (Plot size: 15-ft radius ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 FAC Total%Cover of: 2 OBL species 20 x 1 = 20 3 FACW species 125 x 2= 250 4 FAC species 0 x 3= 0 5 FACU species 15 x 4= 60 0 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 5-ft radius ) Column totals 160 (A) 330 (B) 1 Phalaris arundinacea 85 Y FACW Prevalence Index=B/A= 2.06 2 Typha angustifolia 20 N OBL 3 Rhamnus cathartica 15 N FACU Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is>50% 6 X Prevalence index is 53.0` 7 Morphogical adaptations*(provide 8 supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* 120 =Total Cover (explain) Woody vine stratum (Plot size: 30-ft radius ) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 1 present,unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic 0 =Total Cover vegetation present? Y Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region SOIL Sampling Point: 1-1 Wet Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type* Loc** Texture Remarks 0-12 10YR 2/1 100 - - Mucky loam 12-15 10YR 2/1 95 10YR 3/2 5 C M Mucky loam 15-30 10YR 2/1 100 Muck *Type:C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL=Pore Lining,M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol(Al) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L, R) Histic Epipedon(A2) Sandy Redox(S5) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K, L) Black Histic(A3) Stripped Matrix(S6) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K, L, R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) X Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) Stratified Layers(A5) -Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Other(explain in remarks) -2 cm Muck(A10) Depleted Matrix(F3) Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) Redox Dark Surface(F6) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) -Depleted Dark Surface(F7) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand Sandy Mucky Mineral(51) Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or -5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) problematic Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: - Hydric soil present? Y Depth(inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators(minimum of one is required;check all that apply) Secondary Indicators(minimum of two required) Surface Water(Al) Aquatic Fauna(B13) Surface Soil Cracks(B6) High Water Table(A2) -True Aquatic Plants(B14) Drainage Patterns(B10) X Saturation(A3) -Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(B1) -Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Crayfish Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(B2) Roots(C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(B3) -Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils X Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(B5) (C6) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5) —Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) Thin Muck Surface(C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) Gauge or Well Data(D9) Water-Stained Leaves(B9) -Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Water table present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 13 Indicators of wetland Saturation present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 12 hydrology present? Y (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data(stream gauge, monitoring well,aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region 1795 Fox Street Wetland Delineation Report APPENDIX D Precipitation Data 10/11/2017 Precipitation Documentation Worksheet Using Gridded Database Minnesota State Climatology Office State Climatology Office - DNR Division of Ecological and Water Resources University of Minnesota home I current conditions I journal I past data I summaries I agriculture I other sites I about us Precipitation W orksheet Using Gridded Database Precipitation data for target wetland location: county: Hennepin township number: 117N township name: Excelsior range number: 23W nearest community: Long Lake section number: 3 Aerial photograph or site visit date: Sunday. October 1, 2017 Score using 1981-2010 normal period first prior second prior values are in inches month: month: third prior A'R'following a monthly total indicates a provisional value derived from September August month: radar-based estimates, 2017 2017 July 2017 estimated precipitation total for this location: 2.06 7.73R 4.04R there is a 30% chance this location will have less than: 2.37 2.98 2.57 there is a 30% chance this location will have more than: 4.03 4.86 4.18 type of month: dry normal wet Dry wet normal monthly score 3*1=3 2 * 3 = 6 1 * 2 = 2 multi-month score: 3+6+2=11 Normal 6 to 9 (dry) 10 to 14 (normal) 15 to 18 (wet) Other Resources: • retrieve daily precipitation data • view radar-based precipitation estimates • view weekly precipitation maps • Evaluating Antecedent Precipitation Conditions (BWSR) http://climateapps.d nr.state.mn.us/gridded_data/precip/wetland/worksheet.asp?passXutm83=454758&passYutm83=4979895&passcounty=Hennepin&... 1/1 N- - 1 - N -11, 1 t ...;.2 a I N N aI. -,i,;;.' _ _ 0 rn ," .^ a \ ' . CO Q. 'U E F L f6 oh. t o 0 = tcm_ tN-- fir' i r co o I� M I I F a I F I • tee: — 0. *tioF N T ' r AIM „„ N c Z I I o € t o V o ® L N - a an +. x - E 0i. N o Ln y Cn 1 9 4,N N. I F F M F 1,” t 0 ( F ti I - t 1 N CO N r-- O 0) CO I`•-• CO UD d' Cr) N N- O CO r r r r (segout) uoilepdiaaid ie}ol Alinuow pue AI!ea 1795 Fox Street, Orono: Precipitation Summary Source: Minnesota Climatology Working Group Monthly Totals : 2017 Target: T117 R23 S3 mon year cc tttN rrW ss nnnn 00000000 pre (inches) Jan 2017 27 117N 24w 27 BYRG . 56 Feb 2017 27 117N 24W 27 BYRG .72 Mar 2017 27 117N 24w 27 BYRG . 56 Apr 2017 27 117N 22w 29 BYRG 4.19 May 2017 27 117N 22w 29 BYRG 6.01 Jun 2017 27 117N 22w 29 BYRG 3.78 Jul 2017 27 117N 23w 31 BYRG 3.77 Aug 2017 27 117N 22w 29 BYRG 8.47 Sep 2017 27 117N 23W 31 BYRG 2.06 July/August/september Daily Records Jul 1, 2017 0 Aug 1, 2017 0 Sep 1, 2017 .02 Jul 2, 2017 0 Aug 2, 2017 0 Sep 2, 2017 0 Jul 3, 2017 0 Aug 3, 2017 0 Sep 3, 2017 0 Jul 4, 2017 .05 Aug 4, 2017 - Sep 4, 2017 .25 Jul 5, 2017 0 Aug 5, 2017 - Sep 5, 2017 0 Jul 6, 2017 0 Aug 6, 2017 - sep 6, 2017 0 Jul 7, 2017 0 Aug 7, 2017 .37 Sep 7, 2017 0 Jul 8, 2017 0 Aug 8, 2017 0 Sep 8, 2017 0 Jul 9, 2017 0 Aug 9, 2017 0 Sep 9, 2017 0 Jul 10, 2017 0 Aug 10, 2017 1.24 Sep 10, 2017 0 Jul 11, 2017 .07 Aug 11, 2017 0 Sep 11, 2017 0 Jul 12, 2017 0 Aug 12, 2017 - Sep 12, 2017 0 Jul 13, 2017 0 Aug 13, 2017 - Sep 13, 2017 0 Jul 14, 2017 0 Aug 14, 2017 .89 Sep 14, 2017 0 Jul 15, 2017 0 Aug 15, 2017 0 Sep 15, 2017 0 Jul 16, 2017 0 Aug 16, 2017 .69 Sep 16, 2017 .27 Jul 17, 2017 .67 Aug 17, 2017 2.43 Sep 17, 2017 0 Jul 18, 2017 0 Aug 18, 2017 0 Sep 18, 2017 .37 Jul 19, 2017 .95 Aug 19, 2017 - Sep 19, 2017 0 Jul 20, 2017 0 Aug 20, 2017 Sep 20, 2017 0 Jul 21, 2017 0 Aug 21, 2017 .28 Sep 21, 2017 0 Jul 22, 2017 0 Aug 22, 2017 .17 Sep 22, 2017 0 Jul 23, 2017 0 Aug 23, 2017 0 Sep 23, 2017 .02 Jul 24, 2017 0 Aug 24, 2017 0 sep 24, 2017 .53 Jul 25, 2017 2.01 Aug 25, 2.017 .10 Sep 25, 2017 .34 Jul 26, 2017 .02 Aug 26, 2017 - Sep 26, 2017 0 Jul 27, 2017 0 Aug 27, 2017 - Sep 27, 2017 0 Jul 28, 2017 0 Aug 28, 2017 2.30 Sep 28, 2017 0 Jul 29, 2017 0 Aug 29, 2.017 0 sep 29, 2017 0 Jul 30, 2017 0 Aug 30, 2017 0 Sep 30, 2017 .26 Jul 31, 2017 0 Aug 31, 2017 0 1981-2010 Summary Statistics Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct i Nov Dec WARM ANN WAT 30% 0.48 0.41 1.22 1.96 2.61 3.18 2.57 2.98 2.37 1.25 1.10 0.65 16.57 27.10 26.64 70% 1.14 0.86 1.99 2.72 4.11 5.21 4.18 4.86 4.03 3.31 1.99 1.41 21.38 34.08 33.70 I mean 0.84 0.81 1.75 2.55 3.48 4.39 1 4.00 4.13 3.42 2.39 1.70 1.16 19.42 30.62 30.45 1795 Fox Street Wetland Delineation Report APPENDIX E Previous Wetland Boundary Survey BUFFER Sr. IMPACT PLAN I ci SU AD AZHARI & OMAR ABUKI-IADRA IN SECTIONS 3 & 10-117723 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA k 7.j. .- aa+ —�- ger, ++i _ ,-c� .x. ,..-,- :,„-:.9%.' „, - 9— • �j - .,mow. _. ,y "t�Mt� �� a ,b ae a , srea 4,rys,n,',,/,/0",▪) 4� ��-6 ii �� ,s''''''..,ea''''' �a" ..,,-�� yr F 3- 41 Ys -cw.-- a A ?'‘'-'''▪'s c v '.ktt )b`` 7 '''sk-,s \f''':‘-‘.'''.'ss7„,-.1'''',.:',..,'I',' l',4:17...-4.S.7..1.,15-'irki.'", ,t';-:;'..-' ''''S.,',.4?.':::n71:7.1.-1;.y .';'.'''';1';',';',SS--t"C'1:', a. � t t , 'cam T:°ti a 1t 44 e I -• l .a.� N "la Et d ' rk.' ''°' i • ? ,l.w , 1 rao.i ECVES 'r i .rK 1 ZEE ,03-117-23-44-0006 Zsll.. 5CYm toarol z«a o,I1' ' a53�31 ' �ti� /' i i. 'Elo i ...e m+ �^' GRONBERG&ASSOCIATES,INC. -'�' CML ENGINEERS,LAND SURVEYORS,LAND PLANNERS t- — " —"' —.,..-",„„_.'''I++�'n'**a""'"'� - "'' n w_7 445 N.WILLOW DRIVE LONG LAKE,MN 55356 77_77,,,,,,,,, r,�" PHONE:852.434141 FAX 552.473.4435