HomeMy WebLinkAboutseptic info-including '99 design SEPTIC SYSTEM INVENTOR Y
Address: 2135 Sixth Ave. N. PID: 27-118-23 31 0005
Building Type residence BRs Install'd for: 3 In Musa: Yes
Permit#: none Date of Permit: 6/1/73 Installer: Roto Rooter
System Type: standard trench Experimental: no Tank Filter:
SYSTEM CONDITION
Conformity: 3 Tank Condition: 5 DF condition: 11 Failure Pot: high
SEPTIC TANKS
Material: concrete block Capacity: 600
Setback to Bldg: 25 Cesspool: yes
DRAINFIELD
Length of Lines: 200 # Lines: 2 Trench Width: 2
Treatment Area: 400 Type of Filter: rock Soil Boring: yes
Tile Size: Under Tile: Perc Rate:
Setback DF-Bldg: 30 DF Ht above Wt: 0
Soil Type: Limitations: water table
WELL DATA
Setbacks - Well-Tanks: 50 Well-DF: 75 Report in File
Pump Type: subm. Depth: Diameter: 4 Method: drilled
INSPECTION RECORD PUMPOUT RECORD
DATE DESCRIPTION COMPLIANCE DATE GALLONS
9/10/79 no surfacing 2 9/1/79 800
8/12/82 no surfacing 2 12/1/88 1000 �
�
8/13/86 no surfacing 2 12/30/89 500
9/13/90 no surfacing 2 9/1/90 800
5/16/95 non-conforming-DF saturated,pump tank3 3/1/91 800
9/24/98 non-compliant-DF sat,repair by 12/31/203 9/30/97 750
9/5/00 non-compliant, DF sat,replace by 12/31/:3 7/6/98 750
10/08/02 surfacing,replace by 10/O1/2003 non-compliant 7/26/00 1000
� 7/09/O1 1000
�OOV Co�rct-�� � �� 5��.,,L%' 6/09/02 750
12/19/02 750
`�
' �
. .. ' . . . � .. . .. . ... � � . F ..
. . � . �.� . �. � . ... '. . . . . i
� . ' � . . . . . - � � � t
'
. . . . . ;. ; . . -,> ��.:
.. ., .� . . , , . .'
t
..... . ... . _.. .. .._ . .. . . _ .. . . . . _. , ... _ .., . . ni]�..< . . _.. . __ s _
. . . . _ - _ . . n . � �. � ..- , z � .+4 � - ., � ,� Y�_ i. -,... � . � s .
� ��- �►x-� ����.. ,/U.
�
� -, �-
i ,
�
\
/
\ ,
/
,, /
, ,
�
��_ _ -
, _ _ �I
� �
l ,
� � ���� �� �
b � �
I
II-�-
�
.�, o,�,..
.�
:., o
������? CITY of ORONQ
�, �� ����-���
�� �. ��'r`
,� . ���j-'•��� G biunIcipal Offices •
� `- �i ' Street Address: .
� ���,�:�i Og, Mailin�Addroua
�8 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Bax 66
Orono� MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323•0066
. 95d-�4q-4600
To Current Owner: Address: ��3� S'x�� �V� N .
City Ordinance 199 requires that each existin�on-site sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected every two years.
The on•site sewa�e treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the categories checked below.
SYSTEM CONFORMITY (I-31: 3
1 "CODE SYSTEM"An ISTS which meets all the location,design and construction standards of the current Orono Municipal Code.
2 "C01�'LIANT SYSTEM" An ISTS which does not meet all the location,daign and canstrucdon standards of the curcent Orono biunicipal
Code but does meet the three foot separation requirement or hvo faot rcquirsment for rysums installed 1996 0�earlier,and which Is not failin�or
��an imminent threat to public health or safery.
O3 "NON-COMPLIANT SYSTEM" A prohibited iSTS;an ISTS located within a daignated 100-year flood plain.any ISTS which may
or may not meet all the location,design,or construction standards of t]u cnrrent Orono Municipal Code and which is failing for any reason;and
any ISTS with less than three feet of unsahuated soil or sand betweeo the distribution device and the timidng soil characteristiu.
TANK CONDITION(5:7): S "
��inspection indicates:
Pumpout not needed at this time. �
6 Septic tanks must be pumped out this year (city code requires tanks to be pumped out once every 3 years.
Tank was last pumped_ 6-�t-61 �, �
riake snre sentic tanks are pumaed throuah manhole and not throngh white insoection nines
This allo�tis for the nroner cleanin�.
7 Inspection risers missina tanks could not be inspected. Inspection risers(4"dia.pipe)must be installed in each tank.
DRAINFIELD CONDITION[8-1�: 1v
8 Dninfield Es dry,no surfacing evident. _,_
9 Some evidence of surfacing,not critical yet. � =�` �
10 Drainfield is sativated and visibly dischargin�untreated effluent to the surface. Contact the Ciry Inspector
unmediately. e com a s.
C01��NTS: p�a;�.t1c� 1S 5�����;� �� 1�as bc�� � S�r�:c:� �a �
_�AS� Swc,s� ye�,.c5, cp�q�e b �' IQ -1 - �--oo� . Yov r..�v 5c ��b1�
tQ ��COc��I'C.r �'� ��wC^ . , .
10-`b-Oa. Gl-'�
Date of Inspection hiatt Bolterman— Sepdc System Inspector
Nate:In the event that this irupection rcport is used to satisfy the rcquirements for a mortgage or othet trazufer of properry.be advised thaz this teFart does not guarasitee
orcerdfy thu an eristing rystem wiU eontinue to tunction properiy,but is merely an opinion ofthe adequary ofthe system under eurrent canditions based on the availabie
infocmation.
/
�°�
,, o 0
q;;, ,, .j�t,- :: ,� CITY of ORONO
,,+� � _�. �ti Nt���� otn��
;, �
,L �,'''
\ ,t -<<� -�:��,�G ' Street Addross: Mailin�Addrou:
�y+gg04' 2150 Kelley Pa�kway P.O. Box 66
September , 2000 Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066
Richazd Valiton
2135 Sixth Avenue North
Long Lake, Mn 55356
Dear Mr. Valiton:
An inspection of your septic system was conducted on September 5, 2000. A summary of the
inspection is below.
Septic Tank Condition
1. Pumpout not needed at this time.
The septic system is non-compliant due to a lack of a three foot sepazation distance benveen the bottom
of the drainfield to the seasonally high watertable. The three foot requirement is a State Code, not a City
� Code. A soil boring was conducted to determine the depth of the seasonally watertable. The septic
s}�stem must be replaced by December 31,ZO10.
Enclosed is a list of state licensed septic contractors who work in Orono on a regular basis. Also
enclosed is a fact sheet e�plaining how a septic system functions properly. Finally, an as-built drawing
is enclosed that shows the approximate location of the septic system.
If you have any questions regazding this report, please contact me at the City Offices at 249-4600.
R ec y,
�, �e��
ris Pence
On-Site Systems Manager
Enclosures
In the e�ent this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a mortgage or other transfer of property,be
advised that this report does no guarantee or certify the existing system nill continue to function properly,but is
merely an opinion of the adequacy of the system under current conditions based on the available information.
This report must be kept on the premises�vith the system location and pumping records.
Telephone(952)249-4600 • Fax(952)249-4616
www ci.orono.mn.us
%��
� � �
/� �
',,j ,�3 �r�, -t. ;�; CITY of 4RON0
,, � �"
�' ,�. ' �� ,�l�r Municipal Offices
\;�'',� `r �%� , �a
�'��� � " j� "tr a.�G Street Address: Mailing Addreu:
\' `9$EgH04' 2150 Kelley Parkway P.O. Boz 66
Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323•0066
!,. i � /
Owner: `_�r � /Q �� \ Address: 2135 Sixth Ave. N.
—r—
Permit #'s: none Dates: 6/1/73 Contractors: Roto Rooter
(This is (�] an existing system [ ] new construction) .
SYSTEM COMPLIANCE (1-3) : 3
1 Code System: Meets or exceeds current City standards in all respects relating to design,
construction, and location. Appears to be operating properly.
2 Compliant System: Does not meet all current City standards for new construction, but in
most respects appears to be designed, located, and constructed in accordance with previous
codes and is functioning properly.
3� Non-Compliant System: System may or may not meet current City standards for design,
construction, or location, but is failing to properly treat and dispose of the current
input; and any system with less than three feet of vertical separation between the bottom of
the drainfield and the saturated soil level.
(The saturated soil level is [�] or is not [ ] identified under this septic system. If the
saturated soil level is not identified, this classification is subject to revision.)
K CONDITION (5-9) : 5
5 Pumpout not needed at this time.
Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they should be pumped out this year.
7 System is discharging to the surface. Tanks must be pumped out within 48 hours.
. 8 Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. If tanks have not been pumped out
within three years, they should be pumped out and risers installed now.
9 Inspection pipe is located over tank baffle-can not measure solids accumulation. If tanks
have not been pumped out within three years, they should be pumped out now.
10 One or more tanks are cesspools, which means the septic system is non-compliant.
(The tanks are [ ] or are not [ ] water tight or the condition is [�] unknov�m. If the tanks
are not confirmed to be matertiqht, this classification is subject to revision.)
DRAINFIELD CONDITIQN (11-14) : 11 �U��-p,�
1 Drainfield is 3i�, o surfacin evident-•�� �`'�'
Some evidence of s acing, not critical yet. Repair is not required at this time.
13 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact
the City Inspector immediately. Repair must be completed within 90 days.
14 Drainfield extent and condition unknown.
POTENTIAL FOR SYSTEM FAILURE: (system age and condition, soils, etc.) : high
COMMENTS: The septic system is non-compliant, but does not appear to pose an imminent threat to
public health or safety (surface discharge or backup into the dwelling) . The system must be
repaired or replaced by 12/31/2002 or within ninety days of posing an imminent threat to public
health or safety, whichever comes first.
���q� -� ��---
Date of Inspection e ic System Inspector
Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a
transfer of property, this report does not guarantee that an existing system will continue to
function properly, but indicates the operation of the system under current conditions.
Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510
CITY OF ORONO � O�
Municipel Offices O O
Post Office Box 66
Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 � � ON—SITE SEWA(;E TREA'1'l�NT
r�, � INSPECTION REPORT
'C�� G~
�kESH��'�
owner: �1r/17i� U/j'IT-CY'\ Address:___�lJ�] ��IJC� �. ✓Vi
Permit �'s: h(�Y1� Dates: b'�S Contractors:� ,�
City ordinance number 100 requires that each on-site sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected on a regular besis.
The on-site sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the category
checked below.
(This is ,P`]�an existing system [ ] new construction)
S1'STEM CONFORM[TY (1-3):
1 "CODE SYSTEM��-A system which meets all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City
Codes, and which is operating satisfactorily by treating and disposing of the entire current sewage input
witha�t discharging any pollutants into ground or surface waters.
2 "CONFORMING SYSTEM"-A system which does not meet all the location, design, and construction standards of the
current City Codes, but was installed according to the code in effect at the time of installation, and which
is operating satisfactorily by treating and disposing of the entire current sewage input without discharging
any pollutants into ground or surface waters.
"NON-CONFORMING SYSTEM��-A prohibited system; a system located within a designated 100-year floadplain; any
system which may or may not meet all the location, design, and construction standards of the current City
` , �odes and which is failing for any reason; and n with less than 3 feet of unsaturated soil or sand
�✓between the distribution device and the limit�ng soi c arac eris �c . �� I����
(The limiting soil characteristic has or [ ] has not been identified at his ti If the limit ng soil
characteristic has not been identi i , this classification may be subject to revision.)
TANK CONDITION (5-10):
Tank inspection indicates:
�� Pumpout not needed at this time.
(6y Solids acumulation in tanks indicates they should be p�anped out this year to help prevent future problems.
`�/ Solids accumulation in tanks is at a critical level. Tanks should be punped out as soon as possible.
8 System is discharging to the surface. Tanks must be pumped out within 48 hours to eliminate surface dischar�e.
9 Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. Inspection risers (4�� dia. pipe) must be installed in each
tank at next pumpout. If tanks have not been punped out within the last three years, they should be punped
out now.
10 Inspection pipe is located directly over tank baffle (does not give accurate measurement of solids accunulation).
If tanks have not been p�mped out within the last three years, they should be pumped out now.
DRAINFIELD CONDITION C11-14): ; �
D field inspection indicates: �
�1 Drainfield is dry, no surfacing evident'r
'72 Some evidence of surfacing, not critical yet.
13 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact the City [nspector
immediately. Repeirs must be completed within 90 days.
14 Drainfield extent and condition unknown.
LIMITING SITE FACTORS (sloce.setbecks.etc.):
POTENTIAL FOR SYSTEM FA[LURE (decends on soils.water table,etc.):
MMENT :� � �
i � i
Date of Inspection e c System inspector
Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a mortgage or other transfer of
property, be advised that this report does not guarantee or certify that an existing system will continue to fu�ction
properlyi but is merely an opinion of the adequacy of the system under current conditions based on the available
informet�on.
This report must be kept on the premises with the system locetion and p�anping records.
WHITE COPYllnspectors File YELLOW COPY/Homeowner
On the Nortb Sbore o f
Lake Minnetonka
ON-SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT
INSPECTION REPORT � POST OFFICE BOX 66
� _ � � 1335 S. Brown Rd.
Crystal Bay,MN 55323
- 473-7357
OWNER N�►�� ��'� ADDRESS ��J� ?11r� �✓�' /�'
PERMIT NO.'S. ���� DATES ��� CONTRACTORS �O "����
City Ordinence No.210 requiret that each onsite sewage tresVne�t sys�m in Orono be inapected on a regular besis.The onsite sewage
treatment system at the above sddrea has been inspected and appean to fall into the category checked below.
(This is �an exiating system ❑ new construction)
� � Meets or exceeds current City atanderds in att reapects relating to deaign,construction,and location.Appean to be operating
P�W�e��Y.
�2 Does not meet all current City standards for new construction (1978 Code) but in most respects appears to be designed,
loceted, and constructed generally in accordence with previous codes.System appears to be functioni�g properly;no major
upgredi�g of Me system is required at this time.
� 3 Does not meet current City standards in many respects relating to design,construction,or locatio�.Appears to be operati�g
adequately at this time,but has a relatively high potential for future problems. No major upgrading of system is required at
this time.
� 4 Syatem may or may �ot meet curre�t City standards for design,construction or location,but is failing to properly treat end
dispose of the current input,and is endangering a water supply,or is a source of pollution to surface or groundwaters,or is
creating a safety hazard,or is otherwise creati�g a public nuisance.Please co�tact the City Inspector to discuss system repair/
repl�ement procedures. If drainfield replacement is necessary,soit testing will usually be required,and a design and site plan
muat be aubmitted for review.Your controctor must obtain a permit before work is sterted.
SYSTEM CONDITION (m Checked items may require your action)
Tank inspection indicatea: ❑ Inapection pipe is located directly over tank baffle.(Does not
�-Pumpout not needed at this time. give accurate m�surement of solida accumulation.) If tanks
❑ Solith aecumulation in tanks indicates they should be pump� have �ot been pumped out within the I�t three years,they
ed out this year to help prevent future problems. should be pumped out now.
❑ Solida accumulation in tankt is at a aitical level. Tanks Drainfietd inspection indicates:
ahould be pumped out�aoon aa posaible, �Drainfield is dry,no surfacing evident.
❑ System is ditcharging to aurface. Tanb must be pumped ❑ Some evidence of surfacing,not critical yet.
within 48 hours to eliminate surface discharge. ❑ Drai�field is seturated and visibly discharging untreated
❑ Inspection riaen missing—tanks could not be inapected, effluent to the aurface, This condition mey require replece-
Inapection risen (4"dia,pipe)muat be installed in each tank ment or additions to drainfield. Contact the City Inspector
at next pumpout. If tanks have not been pumped out within immediately.Repairs must be completed within 90 days.
the last three years,they ahould be pumped out now. O Drainfield extent and condition unknown.
SITE CHARACTERISTICS:
Limiting Site Factors Potential tor System Failure Site Capabilities for
O Slope Idepends on soil types,water Future Expansion
❑ Soil table,and aystem condition) ❑ Adequate
❑ High water table �Low Fair
❑ Lot size O Medium �Poor
❑ Lake,wetland,or stream ❑ High . ❑ Inadequate
❑ Drainage ❑System is causing visible
surface discharge.
COMMENTS:
9�3 90
Date of tnspection eptic System Inspector
Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirementa for a mortgage or other transfer of property,be advised that
this report does not guarantee or certify that an existing system will continue to function properly,but is merely an opi�ion of the adequacy
of the system under current conditions based on the available information.
This report must be kept on the premises with system location and pumping records.
WHITE COPY/Inspector's File GOLD COPY/Homeowner
�� � On the North Shore o f
Lake A9innetoyzka
ON-SITE SEWAGE TREATMENT
INSPECTION REPORT � POST OFFICE BOX 66
� _ � � 1335 S. Brown Rd.
Crystal Bay, MN 55323
473-7357
OWNER /I�IGI{�}'RA �/f��.1'�G4✓ ADDRESS � � � `S l� ��1 � 'v�C. �2�
PERMITNO.'S. �N� DATES 10 � � � CONTRACTORS � �r�Z'��'��R
City Ordinance No. 210 requires that each on-site sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected on a regular basis.The on-site sewage
treatment system at the above dress has been inspected and appears to fall into the category checked below.
(This is an existing system ❑ new construction)
� � Meets or exceeds current City standards in all respects relating to design,construction,and location.Appears to be operating
properly,
� 2 Does not meet all current City standards for new construction (1978 Code) but in most respects appears to be designed,
located, and constructed generally in accordance with previous codes.System appears to be functioni�g properly; no major
upgrading of the system is required at this time.
� 3 Does not meet current City standards in many respects relating to design, construction, or location.Appears to be operating
adequately at this time, but has a relatively high potential for future problems. No major upgrading of system is required at
this time.
� 4 System may or may not meet current City standards for design, construction or location, but is failing to properly treat and
dispose of the current input, and is endangering a water supply, or is a source of pollution to surtace or groundwaters,or is
creating a safety hazard, or is otherwise creating a public nuisance.Please contact the City Inspector to discuss system repair/
replacement procedures. If drainfield replacement is necessary,soil testing will usually be required,and a design and site plan
must be submitted for review.Your contractor must obtain a permit before work is started.
SYSTEM CONDITION � � Checked items may require your action)
Tank inspection indicates: ❑ Inspection pipe is located directly over tank baffle.(Does not
�� Pumpout not needed at this time. give accurate measurement of solids accumulation.) If tanks
❑ Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they should be pump- have not been pumped out within the iast three years, they
ed out this year to help prevent future problems. should be pumped out now.
❑ Solids accumulation in tanks is at a critical level. Tanks Drainfield inspection indicates:
should be pumped out as soon as possible. ❑ Drainfield is dry,no surfacing evident.
❑ System is discharging to surface. Tanks must be pumped ❑ Some evidence of surfacing,not critical yet.
within 48 hours to eliminate surface discharge. ❑ Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated
❑ Inspection risers missing—tanks could not be inspected, effluent to the surface. This condition may require replace-
Inspection risers (4" dia. pipe) must be installed in each tank ment or additions to drainfield. Contact the City Inspector
at next pumpout. If tanks have not been pumped out within immediately.Repairs must be completed within 90 days.
the last three years,they should be pumped out now. �� Drainfield extent and condition unknown.
SITE CHARACTERISTICS: �� �S� s��� �k ��� c7 ��L�.
Limiting Site Factors Potential for System Failure Site Capabilities for
❑ Slope (depends on soil types,water Future Expansion
❑ Soil table,and system co�dition) '—� Adequate
❑ High water table ❑ Low ❑ Fair
� Lot size ---0 Medium ❑ Poor
❑ Lake,wetland,or stream ❑ High � Inadequate
❑ Drainage ❑ System is causing visible
surface discharge.
COMMENTS:
f 1�l�.t � ,) �'ic. � � -i.� /�'
Date of Inspection eptic System Inspector
Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirement for a mortgage or other transfer of property,be advised that
this report does not guarantee or certify that an existing system wi�l continue to functio�properly,but is merely an opinion of the adequacy
of the system under current conditions based on the available information.
This report must be kept on the premises with system location and pumping records.
WHITE COPY/ Inspector's File GOLD COPY/Homeowner
, .
. : ' � O� � .CITY OF ORONO
O . O SEPTIC SYSTEM APPROVAL
�. � CITY of OROIITO �
,� �� .: � - �, .
Munjcipal OfBas
� � v �,� Post Oftice Box 66 '
� �'�,� 1 1 _�G cry�sey,��m ss�z3-oo� � .
. �kESI3�g' � . .
� LOCATION: 2135 Sixth Ave. N.
OWNER: Rich Valiton •
GENERAL CONTRACTOR: SEPTIC CONTRACTOR:
SITE EVALUATOR: Volkenant Inc. REPORT DATE: April 15, 1999
The City of Orono has Approved your on-site system design as of May 21, 1999
(approved-disapproved) (date) �
with the following comments:
THIS IS NOT A PERMIT. This is a design approval form which must accompany the site plan. A permit must
be issued to a licensed septic contractor prior to installation. A list of cunently licensed septic contractors is
enclosed.
*'nTI�'E TO Il`;STALLERS: Any changes to the approved plans and specs must have prior.approval of the
Inspector (473-7357). Call for inspections 24 hours in advance.
ALL DRAINFIELD AREAS MUST BE FENCED OFF prior to building site excavation and fencing must remain
in place until final site grading. Approval to pour footings will not be granted until the Inspections Department
has verified that primary and alternate sites aze adequately protected.
� NO VEHICULAR TRAFFIC OF ANY KIND(cars, trucks, eartH moving equipment, etc.) is allowed within 20'
of tested drainfield sites either before or after system construction. Compaction of these areas could render them
unusable prohibiting the timely completion and or limiting the long term use of the property.
A site copy will be available at the City Offices for the septic contractor.
CITY OF N
By
Stephen c an, On ite Systems Manager
" �rxorr�-a��»•Fax-a�osio
' i-�%.
� .�.
i`
�'e
PF.RCOLF�TTON T'F.,STING
&
Syst;em DeSign
i'or
. Rich Valiton
2135 County Rd 6
Long Lake MN 55356
Property Location
2135 County Rd 6
Long Lake Mn
City of Orono
Prepared by
Vo 1 ke,nant Inc
Bob Volkenant
1030 Co 83
Maple Plain , Mn. 55359
' �
, ,�<:
, ' '�
. . :��
April 15 1999
Re: Soil Boreings, Percolation Tests, System Design.
We were retained by Rich Valiton to provide criteria for the design and installation of an on-site
sewage system for the property located at 2135 County Rd 6 , In the City of Orono
This design is based on a four bedroom, type one, single family home with maximum flow of
600 gallons per day.
A total of 2 soil boreings and 2 perc tests were done. From these tests it was determined that a
high water table exists at a depth of 30 to 35 inches below the ground surFace. The high water , r
table determines that only a mound type drainfield may be installed.
The soils on this site are Hayden Clay Loam HcB2, 2 to 6% Slope as identified by the
Hennepin County soil map.
The system shall consist of the following:
-Two new 1000 gallon septic tanks
--One new 1000 gallon pump chamber
-548 square feet of rock bed, mound type drainfield
-Upslope length of 77 feet
-Width of 37 feet
Materials needed for the mound construction include:
-Clean washed sand 100 cubic yards
-1 foot deep upslope
-1.3 feet deep-downslope
-Clean washed rock, 21 cubic yards
-Sandy Loam soil, 18 cubic yards
-Top soil, 100 cubic yards
The mound must be pressurized, therefore a pump must be installed that can pump 40 gallons
per minute with a total head of 23 feet. An alarm system must also be installed to warn of pump
failure.
The entire area that is to be used for th�drainfield shall be protected from any traffic to prevent
any compaction prior to and during construction. Failure to do so shall result in this design
becoming VOID. At that time the site may have to be tested again or an alternate site Iocated
and testing done.
All neighboring wells are located greater than 100 feet from the proposed drianfield site.
Nothing other than gray water (laundry, showers etc.) human waste &toilet tissue should be
disposed of into the septic system. Garbage disposals are not recomended due to the addition
of more solids of a fine nature that may pass through the system. Excess amounts of soap,
cleaning agents& chlorine may kill the bacteria needed to treat septic effluent. Additives of any
kind must not be used. They may cause damage to the system.
It is recommended to pump and service the septic tanks every two to three years for maximum
life of the system.
All requirements of this design must be followed in order for the system to perform to the design
; '.
+Y
' E`,
• Ai„
� M::.
' .�
.'F.
`';}
;
capabilities and for this design to be vaiid.
This design is in compliance with Iocal cQde��nd Minnesota Pollution Contro(Chapter 70$0 as
of the date listed above.
Respectfully
Bob Volkenant
MPCA License#56
. i
N
� u
. r
�0 u,��-y I\O/�� �O t
- -.—`- t �
_.___.. __.
� ..... . ........__ . ,._
� � �,,,,� �ti"� ' �
.;
. �,. � F•.
� I � I .
i
` �J
'�� 4 r , ' ��� �,eiS��,�c� �
(� � � ��, �`� -/�I
� �' ,,��;�-
���� � ��,;
� �
t , � (
t �.. �1l ,�,.
i .rJv,, .,__,....,. ....._.... .._._..�..,,��'� �
r ��`� ��
, ,,``���.,_�_ _...___
'�,i
''.,
� ;
.Flo� ��al ��'� �`�.__- `-��
.�.,
�3.s� �>
' � l ----! �
., _ i
; ,
�� }�o�� sr 22 �,
,
,
�---�`�-----I ._.__..x__�1�' � _. __��____.. .
i
Ib �I� �
1�� � � ��I _ i
ul�(( ,.�
� 4 � �;
/oo e 1- �
'T"3 Nt
�----,:__.__---.X__�_--------� /__. ,.
��,,, __.__ a :y_-----x-� _
crrY flaoNo �
BUfLD1EVG N Vt ___----._.._
--
AV5PECTOR � �
�AT "� PERMR NO. _ �� �A��
,�APPROVED A MITTED �`�'
0 APPROVED WITH CORR�CTIONS AS NOTED ' r - �-`--
� . �
p NOT APPROVEQ---CORRECT&RESUBMIT �
These comments are for your informatlon.All wotk shaN be dor� #:
in full comp3iance with alt appliCabte bui�dMg end 2�cod9. '��,
Requirements including items not apeCMica(y noteC in VAs review.
SCEEP THIS PLAN SET ON SITE AT ALL 7'lMEZ Q_ a �
� �/
--_._.___ �X �j s�I
'�.
� � I S I o p�" 3 a�° .�;
� -y.� �js,� �a � �
�;
�
��
_. --�--. --r— �,�--�---- ____ : 3
--,* -..—.-,�._ -'�-- . .
S
. ;l
� ��',
. r � / � ��,
� 1 az �
� � dr �=
0 � y .
s
------ ------- _ _ ____ � .
....._.__..r.. ----.______ , .
�� j"- �
� �,,,� �., t;� r� ,✓
� � �� �
r
� � �� �
� � �,/,l . ..
�"*r
W ' `
` � /
r". i
. [�`;;^� ..
�
a-�o00 ,� � T„h
g � �`� - � � ,,f �
J� - �e ao y�-r ��,.�..,o C�lo�� �,,,�
O -------------
�
r �
s �..__._
�oU�
�
�:
� � � �
wo!�
,
� �. ,�—n_,._____.,��
�
� � —
�\�,,✓ a��a
I �_�
d
� A
���
/'i'
' ..J
` Q r�� I S
�.
� . . .. '•'1� :
� p •
X----._.____.._k .._ ._..-•---- -x X x
. �
, � _ � _x---...------+�-_____
•
� 4
. �:,
• � �
E`�
Rich Valiton
2135 County Rd 6
Long Lake MN.
55356
Hennpin County
PID # 271182331
A. FLOW '
Estimated Gallons per Day: �OU
B. SEPTIC TANK LIQUID VOLUMES
' Septic Tank Volume: 2000 gallons
C. SOILS {Refer to Site Evaluation)
C1. Depth to Restricting Layer: 30 inches
C2.� Depth of Percolation Test : 12 inches
C3. Texture: Loam Percolation Rate: 30 mpi
C4. Land Slope: 3$ or Rise per 100 foot Run
D. ROCK LAYER DIMENSIONS
D1. Multiply flow by 0.83 to obtain required area of rock layer:
Flow (A} gpd x 0.83 sq.ft/gal/day =
600 x 0.83 = 498 square feet+ lOg = 548 square feet.
D2. Selected Rock Layer Width: 10 feet
(max 10' if <120 mpi max 5' }
D3. Length of Rock Layer = Area / Width
598 ft divided by 10 ft = 54.8ft
E. ROCK VOLUME
E1. Multiply rock area by rock depth to get cubic feet of rock
D1 x 1 ft = 5�8 x 1 ft = 548 cubic ft
E2. equals E1 divided by 27 cubic feet per cubic yard
548 / 27 = 20.29 cubic yards
E3. equals E2 multiply by 1.4 tons per yard
28.4 tons = 1.4 x 20.28 cubic yards
F. ABSORPTION WIDTH
F1. Percolation Rate: 30 mpi Texture: Loam
F2. Selected Soil Loading Rate: .6
F3. Calculated Adsorption Width Ratio
Rock Layer Loading Rate Divided by Soil Loading Rate
1.20 gal/day/ft^2 divided . 6gal%day/ft^2
Adsorption Width Ratio = 2
F4. Equals Adsorption Width Ratio, I��zltiplied by Rock Layer Width
2 x 10 ft = 20 ft
G. MOUND DIMENSIONS FOR SLOPE GREATFR THAN OR EQUAL TO 1$
G1. Minimum Downslope Berm equals Rock Layer Width minus Adsorption Width '
G1 = D2 - F4 == lOft = 2p - 10
G2. Minimum Mound Si�e Calculation
G2a. Depth of Clean Sa:�d Fill Required at LTpslope Edge of Rock Laysr
3 foot Separation - (Ci incnes i t i� ir�ci�esi zootj j
. ',
. . f;'
•;
,�.
�
3 ft - ?_ f�. = 1 ft
G2b. Upslope Berm Height
= lft for Rock B�d F lft Cover + 1 rt of Sand
= 1 + 1 + 1 = 3
= 3 feet
G2c. Upslope Berm Ratio 4:1
Upslope Berm Multiplier 3.57
G2d. Upslope Berm Width = Upslope Berm Multiplier x Upslope Berm Height
G2d = G2c x G2.b
10.71ft = 3.57 x 3ft
G2e. Elevation Drop Across Width of Mound = P.ock Layer Width x Slope
. .3ft = 10 x 3$ / 100
G2f. Downslope Berm Height = Drop. in Elevation + Upslope Berm Height
3.3ft = .3ft + 3ft
G2g. Downslope Berm Rat.io 9:1
Downslope Berm Multiplier 4.55
G2h. Downslope Berm 4Tidth = Downslope BErm Multiplier x Do•,ansl�pe Berm Height
G2h = G2g x G2f
15.1ft = 9 .55 x 3.3ft
G2H is the largest of �_he two values at 15. 1ft
G2j . Total Wiath = Upslope Berm + i�o�k Layer Width + Downslope Berm Width
35.81ft = 1Q.ilft + lOft + 15.1ft
G2k. Total Length = Upslope Berm + Rock Layer Length + Upslope Berm
76.22ft = 10.71ft + 54 .8ft + 10.71ft
Length: 76.22ft Width: 35.�1ft
H. CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL VOLUMETF.ICS
H1. 99 Cubic Yards of Sand
H2. 20.29 Cubic Yards of Rock from (E2)
H3. 17.33 Cubic Yards needed for Loamy Cap
H4. 82 Cubic Yards needed for 6 inches of Black Dirt Cover
;
PRESSURE DISTRIBUTIGN S`i'STEM
1. Selected Number of Perfor�ted L�terals: 3
2. Perforation Spacing Set at 3 teet
3. Lateral Length is to be Centered 1 Foot from Each end of the Rock Bed
54 feet - 2 feet = 52 feet
4. Calculate Number of Spaces between Perforations
Length (3) divided by Spacing (2} = Number of Spaces (4)
52 divided by 3 = 17 Space�
5. Actual Perforations is equal to Calculated (4) plus 1
16 Perforations per Lateral = 17 + 1
6. Total Perforations = Perforations/Lateral {p5) times # of Laterals (P1)
54 = 18 x 3
7. Fiow F.ate (gpmj = ivumi�er oi FerforaLions zimes riow per rarioration
�
1
:r
�'n
Flow per Perforation = .74 gpmJperf
39.96 gpm = 54 x .l9 qpm/perf `'
8. If the Header Pipe is connectec� to the end of the Pressure
Distribution System then the calculated L•ateral Diameter is
2 inches
9. If the Header Pipe is connected to the Middle of the Pressure
Distribution System then the calculated Lateral Diameter is
1.5 inches
A. Pressure Distribution
1. Selected Number of Perforated Laterals: 3
2. Perforation Spacing Set at 3 feet
3. Lateral Length is to be Centered 1 Foot from Each end of the Rock Bed
54 feet - 2 feet = 52 feet
4. Calculate Number of Spaces between Perforations
Length (3) divided by Spacing (2) = Number of Spaces (4)
54 divided by 3 = 17 �paces
5. Actual Perforations is equal to Calculz�ted (4) pluw 1
18 Perforations per Lateral = 1"I + 1
6. Total Perforations = Perforatioris/Lateral (P5) times # ot Laterals (P1)
54 = 18 x 3
7. Flow Rate (gpm) = Numbc�r of Perfo�at.ior.s times Flow per Perforation
Flow per Per.foration = .79 gpm/perf
39.96 gpm = 54 .. .?4 gpr.:!perf
MINIMUM Selected Fump Cap«city: 39. 9G gpm
B. Head Requirements
1. Elevatiot� difference between pump and point of discharge
9 feet.
2. If pumping to a pressure distribution system then ADD 5 FEET
If pumping to a gravity system then ADD Q FEET
5 feet
3. Friction Loss
a. Friction Loss in per 1p0 feet of pipe
3.28 ft per 100 ft of ripe
b. Total Pipe Lengt.h: 230 ft
Equivalent Pipe Length: �87.5 ft
c. Calculated Friction Loss
9 ft = 3.28 ft x 287.5 ft / 100
9 . Totai Head = Cs'zange in r,iEvat�.on t S�eciai itiead Req. + rriction Loss
• �
. . '�
:.
23 = 9 ft + 5 ft + 9 ft
;
A Pump must b� Selected to Deliver at least ;,
39.96 Gallons per Minute 'f�
23 Feet of Total Head
1. Tank Shape: UNKOWN SHAPE
2. Bottom Area of Septic Tank: 32 ft
Gallons per Inch: 20
3... Gallons over Pump: 12
12 = 20 x t 10 + 2j
4. Calculate Total Pumbout Volume
� Calculate Dose
To maximize pump life Daily Flow is will Divide by 4
600 / 4 = 150 gallons
Calculate Drainback
Total pi�e Length: 230 feet
Liquid Volume of Pipe: 17.43 gallons per 100 feet
Drainback (gal) = Length (ft} x Volume (gal/100ft)
0 gal = 230 ft x 17.43 gdl/100ft
Total Pumpout = Dose + Drainback
150 gal = 150 gal + 0 gal
5. Volume for Alarm using 3 inch Depth
60 gal = 3 inches x 20 gal
6. Recommended Calculate Reserve Capacity (75$ of Daily Flow)
450 aal = ..?5 x 600 gal
7. Calculated Total Gallons
672 gal = 12 + 150 + 60 + 450
8. Total Depth {Total gallon dividAd by gallon per inch}
34 .09 inches = 672 / 20
9. Flcat Separation Distance = Total Fumpout Volume / Gallon per inch
8 = 150 gal / 20 qal
1. Tank Shape: UNKOWN SHAPE
2. Bottom Area of Septic Tank: 32 ft
Gallons per Inch: 20
3. Gallons over Pump: 12
12 = 20 x ( 10 + 2)
4. Calculate Total Pumpout Volume
Calculate Dose
To maximize pump iife uaiiy riow is wiii Divide py 4
,A
� ��
•R
�:
i�.
:ti
600 J 4 = 150 galions '
Calculate Drainback
Total pipe Length: ?30 feet
Liquid Volume of Pipe: 17. 43 gallons per 100 feet
Drainback {gal) = Length tft) 1 'Jolume (ga1;l00ft)
0 gal = 230 ft x 1i.43 gal/100ft
• Total Pumpout = Dose + Drainback
150 gal = 150 gal + 0 gal
5. Volume for Alarm using 3 inch Depth
60 gal = 3 inches x 20 gal
6. Recommended Calculate Reserve Capacity (75$ of Daily Flow)
450 gal = .75 x 600 gal
7. Calculated Total Gallons
672 gal = 12 + 150 + 60 + 45U
Pumping Rate: 39.96 qpm
Calculated Timer ON Setting:
Total Minutes ON per Day = Dose Gallons divided by gpm
3.75 minutes = 150 gal / 39.96 qpm
Minutes on per pose = 15 for 4 total doses
Calculated Timer OFF Setting
Minutes OFF Setting
1428 min. OFF per day = 1440 min/day - 1� min ON/day
Minutes OFF between doses: 357
c
r
. +.
�:.
. . :t
Lo�y of �oil. Ilor.in�s
� e-
Location or Pro j ect � /�3 �� ��_ �� �, v,
:
Borings made by ��>� ��1%�1,��/Q.d� Date - �y'�'
Classification System: AASI10 ; USDA-SCS ; Unified ; other
Asger used (check two) : lland �C , or Power ; rlight , or IIucket �_; other .
Depth, BorinR number � Depth� Boring number -Z
in Surface elevation ,5�� in Surface elevation �'
feet feet
O Z � 2
. 0-7 `' La�� 3/� c—� Lo•��� 3��
i -' 7 _ 3� 1 — � -a�
��� ,Lo,� �/3
2 — . ��aY L��-�� -s��
z —
a�- �� ��/Q �-�
3 — , 3 — ��es 6�
��- �o c/a �� �� ,
4 — 5/a _ �;n �" �y ✓ /Z 4 _
. y� - �° ��ay ��Z
5 - 5 _ _
6 - 6 _
7 - 7 -
8 -- 8 -
End of boring at � feet. End of boring at _j� feet.
Standing water table: Standing water table:
Rresent at feet of depth, Present at feet of depth,
� hours after boring. �hours after boring.
Not present in boring hole Not present in borinR hole
Mottled soil: Mottled soil:
Observed at �_ feet of dep.th. Observed at .� feet of depth.
Not present in boring hole Not present in boring hole
Observations and comments: Observations and comments:
. � .
• ; ` � L-14 ,;;
i
� P�RCOLATION TEST DATA SHE�T
Test hole location ,� /;3 c� Cn �� �, Hole number .Z
� Date test hole was prepared De , ''°'
`�' 7 •-�'9 , pth of hole bottom,�_ inches. a.
Diameter of hole, ?3 inches.
Soil data from test hole:
Depth, inches Soil texture
(� " � �t�.���
� — �� ��� a��, �
Method of scratchinR sidewall �r2,,.,�,�2, �d
Depth of pea-sized gravel in bottom of hole, .� inches.
Date and hour of initial water filling �- -�_ �-r'� � y��1
Depth of initial water filling, �f inches above hole bottom.
Method used to maintain at least 12 inches of water depth in hole for at least
4 hours ��� ,y,�l, � � ��o�
Percolation test readings made by ' a ��„i on
�' �- �'�' starting at �� '�t'"' , Maximum water depth above hole
(date) —'P•m•
during test, � ( inches.
- � �
� Time Percolation
Time Interval, Measurement, Drop in water rate, Remarks
' Minutes inches level, inches minutes per
inch
l •�� �l
.'.�Z / .� � �- �;�
's Z- G� �� .
�'a _� .s��- % .
zo 7 ��'�
�:z3 s3i� � as
z 3 � �'�ol%
Z: 3� /� S � j� � 3
, , � ,
✓ P /
�;55� /S� s % Sy 3
Percolation rate = '�,� minutes per inch.
. � ' r � � L-14 '';
, f � z�;.
• P�RCOLATION TEST DATA SHE�T
Test hole location �/,3 5 �,� �� (, Hole number / a.
� Date test hole was prepared �/- 7 -9�_, Depth of hole bottom,Lz_ inches. +1•
Diameter of hole, _� inches. ,
Soil data from test liole:
Depth, inches Soil texture ,�{
d �� L v �s-�-r �
`"j - 1 Z �'�A-c� .L o r�-� �
Method of scratchins� sidewall _ S^ ,�„� �[ ��,�,`,
'.
Depth of pea-sized gravel in bottom of hole, 'Z inches.
Date and hour of initial water filling .�,/- -7 _S9 � ?�
Depth of initial water filling,' � / inches above hole bottom.
Method used to maintain at least 12 inches of water depth in hole for at least
4 hours I�H_�o.,,-�,�rv�rF Sr/� L o�J
Percolation test readings made by ��> h �� �/l�„�¢� on
�- � -�'/ �' starting at �/,� �� �m�� . Maximum water depth above hole
(date) -�'•m•
during test, /� inches. �
� fv'.�7 S
Time Percolation
Time Interval, Measurement, Drop in water rate, Remarks
' Minutes inches ).evel, inches minutes per
in ch
// . � � �/
11's� �.5� �/ % I % �.s
//f � / � 2�'�
� Z�D L /� si$ % .
/ �
I Z 6 4 ��y� /2r J�/�
/2:Z� /S �%' / :S
f 2:Z (r �Q�'l/
/ �
2: 3� �-s .S/g �
�z:3� G �,�,�•
z;sZ � � �G
Percolation rate = f �] minutes per inch.