The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutWetland Delineation report-2011 ��I � Graham Environmental Services, Inc. � ��R�� Spring Hill Golf Club Wetland Delineation Report Orono, Minnesota .a F�} �•Y.�t $�.� 9�'�ti� a. 4�� .� ��. ;�,;' .�-. ��- � ` �� "rr.� � e _':il�r k: " ,�, s�,�+-R+�n. � v ` �::. - 'x�'�'. � A' �¢�E F� } T�A. ;. � �( �t k � . . 9i' � _ ' `�'it�.. x � � r �W e, ," ��i p �t� � .,�i �$' �' . : �, �iy �f �� . # �s ,�^k-.�.�, y�� ,• � � ��t',�;.r;+�` '`� hi ;y J` '. ,�° } t�S' �„' . F,� .f. . r� �^ '.,y �x;�,� t.` � } 1� ��`� �l,� i f��t , , aw� .� � r r � r• ,�► r t.� � � �+�` _ � .. ,. r.� ' • ' � : J �'! �,,,:.. � �� y r.�'`�_h.,�� ' #�'� .{ _�� r. .# � �s t � � , , � ' �� i.%- i. � � �! �� . ,J 1 `t � � ! � � { � l:,'`,� "`�;�t"�'�,��,; ��t�a a� � �� 4�•, ,� � � ,i{ �, �, > , , �, , ��,, , °��1�� : � �.�f = i � �a,�� "�� <<,*c+ s n ,�..�, +�';:hM��-�.R u 1r �. � � . "� i. . � '�h '.'f i lF ��4 �ks( ..•�4''.:� Y.'�.t-. 'i,�- ;,'�1,�x,+,�e.i�� . � : _p,. ..r s ..�i�� k•. � 14 '�. -� _ ; _.k ;,. . �d , ,-'t ,-w� ,a . � .` . .� . � .. � ., �' �" _ � . , _,. .: x��-. ;% �e�.z,. ...�' ,. ` . a. ,.r','..:. -.}.., y'.,,. . ' �a. �. Wetland A—Looking North December 5, 2011 GES Project No.2011.036 � � . . `�, � Graham Environmental Services, Inc. S1095 Westland Drive �; � � Spnng Valley, WI 54767 � Phone: 715-778-5730/888-279-2070 •,, :;� Fax: 715-778-5867/888-279-2069 Wetland Delineation Report Spring Hill Golf Club Orono, Minnesota December 5, 2011 Background Graham Environmental Services, Inc. (GES)was retained to delineate wetlands in the vicinity of two areas proposed for improvement at the Spring Hill Golf Club. The site is located in part of the NW '/ SE '/. Section 26, T118N, R23W, Hennepin County, Minnesota (Figure 1). As shown on the U.S.G.S. Quadrangle map (Figure 2), the topography on the site is rolling. On October 24, 2011, GES conducted an evaluation of the site, collecting data and ctelineating two wetland boundaries as shown on a recent aerial photograph in Figure 3. Methodologies The wetlands were delineated using the on-site methods contained in the "Routine Determinations" section of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers "Wetlands Delineation Manual" (Technical Report Y-87-1, 1987), as well as "Interim Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation ManuaL• Midwest Region" (U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, 2010). This is the methodology currently used to determine wetlands by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for implementation of Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and by Local Govemment Units under the Wetland Conservation Act. GES classified the wetlands under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) Cowardin system, Circular 39 and Eggers and Reed methodologies. Soil colors described herein follow Munsell Soil Color Charts. Hydric soil properties described follow Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States (Untied States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2010. Field Indicators of Hydric Soils in the United States, Version 7.0. L.M. Vasilias, G.W. Hurt and C.V. Noble (eds.). USDA, NRCS, in cooperation with the National Technical Committee for Hydric Soils). � . . . Wetland Delineation Report Spring Hill Goff Club Site GES Project No. 2011.036 December 5, 2011 Page 2 of 3 Results We�and A GES delineated a narrow wetland band that bisects a fairway and connects to additional wetland to the west and east. We would classify the portion of the wetland within the fairway as seasonally-flooded palustrine emergent (PEMC) which equates to Type 3 inland fresh shallow marsh under the Circular 39 classification system and 136 Shallow Marsh under the Eggers and Reed system. The wetland was evaluated along one transect on the south side of the wetland strip as indicated in Figure 3. The upland and wetland data collection points were located approximately at each end of the transect line indicated in Figure 3. The upland is described as mowed fairway consisting of Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis). The upland slope adjacent to the delineated wetland boundary rises relatively abruptly and consists of"rough° within a fairway. The transition befinreen the wetland and uplarxi at the transect location is characterized by a relatively abrupt change from OBL vegetation to FAC vegetation. Soils also demonstrated a relatively abrupt change from dark and gleyed silt loam and clay loam to lighter colored mixed fill. WeUand B GES delineated a portion of the edge of this wetland which is part of the same wetland that was delineated as "Wetland A" to the north. We would classify the portion of the wetland we delineated as a combination of saturated palustrine emergerit/seasonally-flooded palustrine emergent(PEMB/PEMC)which equates to Type 2 inland fresh meadow/Type 3 inland fresh shallow marsh under the Circular 39 classification system and 15B Fresh (Wet) Meadow/13B Shallow Marsh under the Eggers and Reed system. The wetland was evaluated along finro transects as indicated in Figure 3. The upland and wetland data collection points were located approximately at each end of the transect lines indicated in Figure 3. The upland at the east transect (Transect 1) is described as upland shrubs, trees and "old field" consisting predominantly of staghom sumac and smooth brome. The upland slope adjacent to the delineated wetland boundary rises relatively abruptly. The transition between the wetland and upland at the transect location is characterized by a relatively abrupt change from FACW and OBL vegetation (Phalaris arundinacea and Carex lacustris)to mixed vegetation (sumac, brome, gray dogwood). Soils also demonstrated a relatively abrupt change from very black mucky loam to lighter sandy loam and loamy sands. Wetland Delineation Report Spring Hill Golf Club Site GES Project No. 2011.036 December 5, 2011 Page 3 of 3 The upland at the west transect (Transect 2) is described as planted native prairie consisting predominantly of switch grass and big bluestem. The upland slope adjacent to the delineated wetland boundary rises relatively abruptly. The transition befinreen the wetland and upland at the transect location is characterized by a relatively abrupt change from FACW and OBL vegetation to FAC vegetation. Soils also demonstrated a relatively abrupt change from very black mucky loam to lighter sandy loam and loamy sands. For more detailed information on each wetland, see data forms in Appendix A. Jurisdictional boundaries on the wetlands were established where the soil profiles in the upland soils demonstrated a lighter matrix tone, there was a change in plant communities, hydrology indicators were absent in the upland and a change in topography occurred. Figure 4 and 5 depict the National Wetlands Inventory map and the Hennepin County soil survey, respectively. Figure 6 shows the Minnesota DNR Protected Waters Inventory map of the areas evaluated. Ground photos of each wetland transect location are included in Figures 7 — 9. The information contained herein represents our findings during wetland delineation activities conducted on October 24, 2011 at the referenced site. RespectFully submitted, Graham Environmental Services, Inc. . � e Gra a - Professional Wetland Scientist No. 365 Minnesota Wetland Delineator Certified No. 1179 Enclosures sp�� n Wedina � �`_. � -- �� Green Deer Hill Rd oaks Park �.� Z Approximate HunterDr �,� J Site Location o �; ,��,:. � r � � � � Z � o � m � � c E 6 = � `- 6th Ave N r1°- Orono Plymouth m` ` N�� =--. W �a� Rd �� 7 � _-, 1�_ Z W Fs � � � � � � �hYisrd Rd � , 0 a<, �, R��, ,� �- Lo�3�' � .m : � e�e _.__' � � Daniels St � � z Long Lak@,:�_t — y4JayT�Yd B1Yd Lu adto � y 746 "�,.�.� 72— � a� ��e� � �o "ri hi��and iP 7588-2006 f.iicrosoft Cor oretion and:or ds su liers P.II ri hts reser.ed •,` � m � N Not to Scale Figure 1 . Site Location Map I�Ij`� � \ � G Sprin Hill Golf Club ,� � 9 � I� E' Orono, Minnesota S � GES Project No. 2011.036 Graham Environmental Services, Inc. �/� \ �t: • ' - -- • � ---•- - - - -- •----•� '- ' -. .. „''I,:.. . `p _ -«.;�� , li �:) ' � . � ,•- : . _ _. ; . .. . : �� y _ . - � -' • � �.I a�� G' j ` ` ---�— '�` i� . - �'G r" • � i � �- ' � '�% - +/O - �J � � •� �: Q __ �� ' •, + _ .. , = _ _ , � ,�a o � '' u ,-� � � s � ic \ ``y�'_.'s�_- . — ,roo� �ii� �ic�. ��,, J� _ s�- - -'.�cve a., ` � I�oos�., • - ••� �� - . /� ; ,- � � _ _ �, ._ . - � ----- � _� s-� ? . , w� � _ � • , - -� �-'' \; aa, .�.�- � ` � ,� •, • ,.i , � _^ .� V � �� r-. 'i ��• 1 ��,� � . „y, ' �,. �_ � J 1� _ . . ... . �n �/' . r'2-�� I l�� ,�i _ .�' � ' ;k.. � .�_ '�" •f l - �. �1 . .• �. � �_�'R .- �}; . � ao� � 1�` ��.,� .l Q�� O -a � i ` �r_ �,Y ' +5 , ;�ti . �� O ,� C.% _:�'� �p .i r��- i� � � . f/�- ,� T - � _!� O , ! � l 3T O ' ' � C" . _ • � � ` � �� ( e � �� _ Approximate ; �, ' �.�� ' - , ` � �_ _r,�� fr , ,�.' � �,��• , ��ft� _ 25 __ � o -- �- Site Location � ��.._ -- " �� ' '�� . . __�. - - -- - -- . � _ _ ._. -0.� �. , 'TnntCg C � [�o��i F `'IHtA. � �.".�t . at�7,.., - � _��_Q %-- �., � �ozs� i� �? � ^ � �oaz �i �" `, ° . � , "f �; ' _ � _ 2 _ ,� l sas�Moo .• � o �, . ' I "`�o0 5,� � �•Op� C-.joo � • • i = �D t• •k ,� - , � '�-n,', • h . �p .e•. . � �� ,;._; fr , f \ '`.� �,. �� . . � . �� K '�4� � � F � ke �� ..---� '� .�_ � � ` � ��r ,, � :�� '^�' _ I! �� '� t. ' _ � � � �'^� � - o /- �-r- � '�a I, ' " �A fl o � 7 ' "' /'� ^.�. ��-J . • � �C, ; , � . - _ . ; Q fl --_--,,,. l�� '� ,�rr . , � � .. � ' , � : '� _ . . ' ✓ • � "C . � yso -c1-��^4 Jp� _ .. , ., 6 . . :. _.�:;,,� _ (�� , . . . . . . . �� :=� — ..: - �-�:_:_ a-----�;r- .--� :� _. _ ., , , ' ` � �_�,�� ,� , . `d, . c'--' o- . � _ . � � �� , � �`�:� v �� ` � ��-�0,\ �, ':.r. j� • \r I , � 1 . .,:, , _ _ . , _ �� _ ,� . . � � , �_ o� � � b � • . .(�=--a,r-.� i - - �. . _o° �--; . _-. ... ._-�� t� �.. y�j � N i' .. �y �Q 9�° - -: - I \� ! � ! .. , k :. q � i�i - -. �; o i — ) - N ;' z-1 _' t- - �,,,, � �' _ L�,�e ��. � �� - ,� +�� ,; � � /� -�� '` � - . � _ o ��% - a � � s �ra • ,,�` � � � a `. ,� �a�n,g ,q,,� � ��1%�al� ,. - j%:,«.'�- 9sc� a" ,,� - p ,,r �" . -- .� ,. l, ,, ,, _ r, ; ;:�,y s �� :o �,o. , " ,l.� , ■ �'..� � �-...__` �t =— ^ 4 • ~ —. `,J� o �- ri �.:^-� . , , . u. - . • .� . _ . � , �, . . . _ ��;� . . , � �'� ' � %�- 1 J � �`? - ��, •`1��,v—< <._ _ , - . . . _ ,-_-._ _ -_� ._�. � _ .._., . t... � �. ,,� ; , h �, ,� • �� .�: A N Not to Scale Figure 2. U.S.G.S. I�\1` � � Excelsior Quadrangle I � Sprin Hill Golf Club ;�, � 9 � I' E' Orono, Minnesota S � GES Project No. 2011.036 Graham Environmental Services, Inc. � �'��. �'P P S4 + � :r", '�� 'r �� .� � ' r� j � s �� , ar� Y _: -•- ,. � . t . .. �.�; �• 7 �'� , : � - .� ��, �-'. ,",� � w `°r � •' • .;�� ,'�`: ` � � L � ,�' ,4 : ,� � , ',� ,�'° ,� :-�,.w---- .� ��,•'�', • � ;- � ; , � �.,,�"" � • +; ; . � `d� ., ;;"�� ; * �, . . ' _,.._.��'".� � , � _ '� , __� �� .� „ _ - . � , �, F, k . 'w,� ` • , a:.: ' .. , = ' � : � �aK. y�� ; � . � :,. � � -� � � '� � i , � ` . ♦�* - V B- S�f� � �� +��V 4�Y�' '��+. ' R .�� (�� /� � f � �� '� ,,� '�'�� '� ,..� � �`�.�q+ - Approximate �=� � - � �" + - �� - '� ; • > ,: � � , . _�+„ �y� � . , ,. :- � Evaluation � � � � Areas � y' ,�� , , r � �,,_ ` . < '.`�' z � ' '� �' �� ? ; � ;�- , � �, � �� . � ,,��:- r ��,r `n. �# �• � � _-�, � ° �� f ' �i .I s �0.�� - � . 4 � �r �� '• � _ � ;: t ' ' ` f� .. .. �.'� �� ir -��.' ' �,.�. . A. " ,. ' � . . � �� . y y♦ . ' .i,/�+l� �e � ' .. , A�G St^1`• '� � �� .. ��.. � ��I'+�Y.� �` �;��,� P f ` ' �: �',°�'�� '`r� y "��'� T �� • �� ,! M, ' a �. ' �� ,�" A. � .e .i-- ` �, '�• �._ ��d ^ � '��' � y��pI w .,�, , � t . �..tia� i ' �_-•-� �b.��,� e'k 6 � . .!'^ . � ��}^� .. � F � ,. � �'�' " � �';� � f4 e. p,` k n . � ��,� „ • ¢ r o � , '+. t � a,j , .� "- , ,:. a . .�, �,., . _ _ � _ . � ' ' . �A. 'a. -' 7`#'r37' 8 . r�,� !�� ..2...'SL'.`.' v �, ��~ ��t / +: IT1�pQUESi m -'7, a� . ' •` ti - :t . s• f - . � .; � . � ;:ib` � . � '+r'a ',i'-l�.�i�_ • �:_ �, .....��L_ �s w.��'►'.:.. - A N Not to Scale Figure 3. Aerial Photo With \l` � \ Approximate Wetland Boundaries � 11 � Spring Hill Golf Club � �� ' Orono, Minnesota S � GES Project No. 2011.036 Graham Environmental Services, Inc. ren �'�rc ��s � . � � • , ,. National Wetlands Inventor D�c S.2011 r :�«.'!2'. .. • f% I.t 'r � � � Wetlands � �� °f� S�� N ``��y '�� • � £�+ ..�*�R�, T �� '' :.} � 1; p 9 �'�{e�'i�� IleV�eW . ,::,.x ��, ��.t A': � f� '� �/�r � t�ta�:- Fresnwiler Ei*w�ql�! :. . , �'� ,� ' ,�r - FreshwaferFprested'Shru� `= Areas ° :�. ,. ,. 4 T,.� ' t,t •-� :�, Y .�'�-�-_ „�t ,e� , .� �� f�4 `f� - Eswanne anC Manne DeeDwater � � , ,g�"� t �',`1- . ��. Estuanna antl Manna y w � ,�=---t �� ,;��t� i•� �.�� 1 �' � � y;� a�"4�,,�� $ Fresnwsler�anC A��,� !�, ��« ,�- ;t � , � �P .�. � "� .�. w�*' . -b � Lahe fp.� `\ . �,y� � �.� ' ' f .. �� ' � .. � •{� `4`�• � '' .a ` �'9` �'"' r 4a ''� �� Rivenne t. �� fi°��; Olr�er �,h y�,x� . � �, ¢�� } PEi�I(: .��. ��`',F�t'p`� ;f,, �,. L � .S��US P BG �`" �' r � ' � ��r �� Ggitai ' � �," �i �� g�-� �� z��:Scan ':�,.� "I�, f% ,'(s�y� '""� �'- ` � e�,:. K�* ,�r Non-Digd� 4��H � �r -#i .� � ..? t,► �. ,�.� '� �No Data �,;, f,� '� ';t �s- { z• • 3 ��. . _�'+�_';."�' >«:' ��*�' g, >."a , ,. . �Y ;'-� �,�� ,�, �� ,� , �� . -r �` ,�, ♦� 'PEMC ��e t�,`�. ,. r: � .g��: � a� :: w, t �� y ioam a�'� ��°''� �; ''EfdF\ .�% �. , � . aoo�ft .. »',,• •� _ ` .t+° � �";.-t"� �'�'�'... � "�� = - _ � M, , .• ` T�if mp is br geMrY refercnce�nly The US F'isA antl Wiitllik S<mce�s rcsponsid!fw Me aau�xy o�curtentMss ol[�<Wse Cao shovn on t�iz rt�p FII wUarMc rNa4E tlata tnould bo�sM in accud�riw rilA�M layer mNatlata�ounE un tM W�1lar�Mappar ww sia User Remarks: � N Not to Scale Figure 4. National Wetlands �\� � � Inventory Map t' �7 Spnng Hill Golf Club ;� � � �' E' Orono, Minnesota � � GES Project No. 2011.036 Graham Environmental Services, Inc. _ . '.� • .' . ,��.�� . � :.`." �� , �` �Y��, :�, ''�r. � � r�/ i� "��1r l� �� ,� ��y, .M1� °j�,.h:��• ..�f:�" C��.: � ai� aa�a.+ � �" ,i3 � �� . �,,�+°�� F#': ,�I r�''��• � a� ,� . ��w,.,��y��_�A,� . w � � . ' : � � �. w�� _,' y' �� .��/ k _- � . ! �, 'y� � �l� .i�� q�� I! �' i .�� + ,�� ' I�,$' �„�' '� "� � A"' '��a t ,; .�: � ,� .. � � �!Z! �� I� h•'w;� �`;o. . �" � �` ��. � , ,�r , . �� r � � � ��. , , • , �+� ► • ,, ' • ` '`�` ,�� "`��'y' « . ,�� ' �� , .,'�;t:., �. �' �. -� «.. "��.� ��@-- � � �ar�� - � �,. �>�w S I.t"�� : � � � �� . , �.�..` �`Y",A�. � •� ` ... _- .a �.�fr. ��?!;,r p � , � �" � �� I �� ,�� ;'.A��{ � ��S'$►- � '��F�,7►�� I� I �� ;'.'��'3 �, �!y �w � '� �`� r ' .� i�� J� � �� ` '�� ' � � � � ��17�'��4.-- • f Y. .. �,. • I �r..�+ ,� 4� '� �* �� .�, �� . ,�, , , • "",,� . 'i *Ia�' �.�• i '�,�~"�i . �e� ��rt,�a�* � .. � " � � �M�� 4 :� i �� :� 1. �,�1 �'Y� .� `L. � '�v� � �� '��• ( _�� Y��,� �� . �.� ,a ��4R� ,� a ,. � *�A..Mg\ `5+.y'. 1 .,�3 s�m. �s� � A� �., z '�� ` �R fip`i` � � °,�r ��,'��, �� =�. .�. t ,� #��. . el � �{ tl� �q „T fS.� s Y�er. ��' -.�` T{ .�$ `�a��i.Y�.. � !I ..�j[_, � ,l� L.' � . . . ��.. _ ,„� �� _ �t � 4 . • �`, . „ 1t' :g� rt , .gr��!� � :� .._ .'Ytr�s- �� ..� ., . .r .. ,m'.+, r�-,o . . #' � � ��✓ � � t ,�r�'� ��Y 1 � � � 4 . !. .9, �, � ,��,,�.,,.__,+�rw�r�...4.. _ ..�':' '�;±�� ., S �a »l� �M�i. �{�#'��f " � � '•�� ^�,.. . � . , h ... . ,., _,; 1�*�_� 4 �y� . ��'ffi �S+* � R ' .�' ' . .,4, . .... � . � . i�u`. � i...�•a�_ ..k.''.ic�'ti� .:"lE�...� Leqend L22C2 Lester loam, morainic, 6 to 12 percent slopes, eroded L22D2Lester loam, morainic, 12 to 18 percent slopes, eroded L22E Lester loam, morainic, 18 to 25 percent slopes L23A Cordova loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes L24A Glencoe loam, depressional, 0 to 1 percent slopes L36A Hamel, overwash-Hamel complex, 1 to 4 percent slopes L49A Klossner soils, depressional, 0 to 1 percent slopes L132AHamel-Glencoe, depressionat, complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes A N Not to Scale Figure 5. Hennepin County I`� � � Soil Survey 1�1� , � Sprmg Hill Golf Club ;�' � , � � �� E Orono, Minnesota � � GES Project No. 2011.036 Graham Environmental Services, Inc. C O Approximate Site Location � �3 �► . '�4W� � - ---- — - - - �37,� g3z,� yyyp_ • MEI�ItiA ' . �fi t� .�,.:,.�,� ��3� �.�.,.r �� y k. ' � � ��F ' W �q � ` ��+ r� .n � • aL � ; 5� u ^p � '�'`--�'.ti� , � � ��ff z .____ , ,C - ___ �MV . . ��Zp ; • 14 f , SMIW ~�. �. i i d��d _ _ 1.j + �� + . a :� � �� :.a _ l � �I • � n Ir�� ` !�� r �� M. � �I '• LONc� LAKF. • , �I� ..�. .�.,,�� l ^c �� —� - -�`�? ��19w� _ 1 JfadMv �A ;3 . � �- ` , �� f��1 Lake � = ( r � �' - _��y �:? _ _ _ , 9� --- � �� i ,, !- .� �,�f3{r,� ' �� F � t� ,--__ �, __ __ ^,:�.. � • � 1 � �; � \ tr�' _ _.-' �, �rl � ��,l' �� '- � 114'AYZATA � ,,-_ � ►.��` �* P s �y� --� �,. ,. _ .��.� � � R� ssru r � � . .�.� � �� f� ' ' t s��- a �,�, �I r�ri� �e � � ,4�� _� - _:�,: �. .. _�_ �� N Not to Scale Figure 6. Minnesota DNR !\� � � °� Public Waters Inventory Map 11� � Spring Hill Golf Club � ;�� E' Orono, Minnesota S � GES Project No. 2011.036 Graham Environmental Services, Inc. .:g �.> , , : , , ��.-p', - , . .. y �� , � :�� ,� . t� �, ,t ,�Y �.� �� ,�� ; � �� a� � - ' y r . . 3 �"' `^` � �� t F �i ,t �3� �. �- ,w�id v ,{„�?` ? . � ��y 't�. � �� . �� `u� ' �y '� �� i �}.�� t '' ' �,'� �,e,_� � e . •�� . •��,� 'C: �f� 'n� .�, . t 1 �. �` �•n .. `ti �''��V� '��:8 :�'�•, . ��"� i . �-'� .e ;+„( r.' y�-. i q ...k .`'.1�. � � �a�. q � f. C� ' �#i � � , 'j��i�j� � �+ �, ��♦3{��[ ��Ly�� l} , 1L444! f5 1 .. r � �u, L � � Y.�' �� tj� �P�'. .1 � tT V' 1 ., ' � � � �.�y�l 1 ff4�� 4 �>/ � : r.:.��.1z �$'; �f �.ar - �L � . K fl�v"i`�!1r � ��•��"'tr��.��.�s� ' ��,��_ rk ,k.,� i i `�;``+� ' r .�'� " l. ,.��/k yS 7� S„ R r � f�"� .�'�J'j�� r 3 !' .5�'��1�s.� '� T"� +H *-s� y � � A �� ::� ti �j, �I ry/ .4 i��T��! Ei ! � -a� :;;�}� :'ir ��ti-y � ..�'+"i yG�q'8� ' '/„"'r�' : ti,• °' '".'J` .�'��t ' . �" , ��1�� .'i d /,��' , .. . �p 1 '�°*�"'.k,1��4�t -�'��t ,� ��t�{ Y i' �'„r f s r.� ��, Y ' 'r ! !-s�-.y,}r��'4�"'.� K""• 4k�W r � �� . �a'r '�'a t-.k�� ..., � , . . f �•'. �N ��,7 I 4 ��•,�Ikb' r 11'� , ;�, �� q � �� v " � rl:,�� 1 � , � I�a_� � �,( , �+ � �t.i ti � r : � �� : _ ,� �a. � � ��1 ��°/i�� 1�{ ��1 s l ti��/� ,�r ti�� '�" �� ri :��?i�v,''�r �;�. � ,a �r �, �. ,� ��`�i� � � �� .?��'�r � �°! �(i ,.��r � �1/ ��d�l , � '�i� ��'�bY` ��7�r l�I �"� ie' '. �e .:��t67 � o :;� . . -" u ','� �,. ",; i ".e� � .,� ^ �. .� a�j .� �N .f� � ' I �s"1 s 4 .. ' � �'; ' '�t �f v„ ...... ... . , '.. ' -t t �r`..., s -�,., .. „ . . r; � E'�S. -'�`��pS ; ' � +�. y� � �� . . , � .� �� ,. +"f � �{aF, _. '�' �� _� ��:..'. .�'-! �� 6 �y+� � .�� : _u,x, ,�}�tt t � '�pl.�y" lI� � �V t�, ..� ,�,r.. ��7 :.H y f r : �.R. � ,. �f . M a i .. s .--7 a �, �^y � .�� {p� r"s,� .. :,r is'�.�.�sa �r � �j �.,�wi f ;s N.� ' f4' ��' �r . '� � . � � �1y a� �H f +k4�� _ +r � t� � x:�� }s�� '1�� s� � At:� �,b,i �r��y'/p._t,r+�� i� � �' ; _ ?" . > � �e � �I r �,�� , . re�' °'�. . ��A^ #� ��' � v t �r �.vj'�1�� '"� v ��i,I�'.+ �, Y �r�� .�ig..�d 3�`�?,�r,'�� 7 '. "+�rr�r� ' � it`"�' �.u� r�rr� 'Yh-� (�� , .+��.. 4� ,�,,,��i� i � � • � �� , A .r � C� ,�r Y ��, � �r�. +i` �' +t �,-� � �'f'� , � .Y Y� wi .� ! ` � �i .�.ti{� a�� , n '� .r ,y�{►� �� A��. /��i �v�' k'��4��}'°�_°3.t;i,�f �"�,} 9„� �ti• t ' y et� �� S I (: , ��`�'"�.��c�'�i4�-5��`At�4.` syi�i�e`'� � �2�� r.ri; �5 ' �'.�� .. t�� .�; s ,fy"`hFs,�i x '�¢� 1��Y�31' ,� s }� 1 } s r ,�"� 1 i{I�4�� i •.�,"v�" �q �-<, .a� � � i �A c .f o ?n �{J"'�,. F t n° f � - a ay., z } a J �• k ' « �� ,,, � '''�� `�o'��N`�� Rri �,� e; �yi �`��^ �aL�t,�' f'�t+ C� ' � yk a �� )py,•�+4�°, {�r; �' r}r�#�a � j�,�" � P�w. ��¢��.,; y��i� ';.j��r ?i�f�1�i �',�'�e�y�jA��'�,.f;,. {��,4/�q�i.`�� ' �•,'Ja �e�}`'� �l��s � l r`::. �t ' �p a.�, �y�, � ;R .',' r z . i ' y i - ��i . i �+ � : �h� � � x�'d�w�. ��r S -, � ir�`.,�yl � y� r t4 h��'k�N� �"a ; �°��ts�' � r Y ,, �; � �ia�:� �r � ( p{ � 'n r.t ��""� .�� M�n k�r , :C^'v`l.'�> � �h. � Yg�P�j.�t '��(;y'7� rr� �' t:, �. ��' ��I�,��'�`r � �. fyr fc,� Wetland A— South Boundary Looking Northwest A N Not to Scale Figure 7. Ground Photograph \� i � `� Wetland A at Transect I 1� , �/ � S p r i n g H i l l G o l f C l u b ;l I1' �' c Orono, Minnesota J � GES Project No. 2011.036 Graham Environmental Services, Inc. m! ,y S �...�5��+�"'�+�. j}�, � � ..f �'e'� . ; �� '.�� :` � ��'�.�k Ik� ll '. .J P / Y" � �J�. {�` S � � � .e�t '"'y,,.. �i� .�� '�(,' '� r A � ,X'�y,� -'� +�•, , '' ' �:d ..A .�,'"-r� .�i-• r � ;� r�� +,1�" �f �t, . �.� � , ,� � r�- r . v- + , 4 � +- , � '"; x = �( � 4,hiYk-'� .��i��. �, .r�. � M� .! .� . _.. _ '. r "``�'1 ;� ��'u��t' J�.i� Y� . ... �ti�'i�ltr'��'�'�..,`'� .. �. -._ . . �#�-.,+�m�, _ �"�.3C.�e. e �,c;.�...� � �"`�tJ� -�l�.'t-��)p�f. s�l lr ?_ �'��f � � �..' '� 4 ��1� �fKr:r{,�,w A�j� .t ^l: � . �� . �e�° rFy� '�4 �'� �f. � •��t-tlt '�� Y�1 A t ��,i i..7 � � y�i�}� / � r � �� & . It �� i �i� �(�� ' 1 �' - `�' ��"�a 4�� a, � t� . '��V " iS' ``d*,'�6�.l►�4 }� �ya , f .. •.r g�., ��+)f n y } ti. q��,ryw� K i �� a .. �, �/I 't�f'. �,'a t+ r � ♦ 1. , �f`i� "1 -N'�' D£ ea� }n 'f�" f �'� � ;i .�� y N �-'I�'i l I! ,Y•M1'P �...,,,�,.�. �,� 1�� ., �,'�'#Y�' '`r,r � r fE"' '';r„� y� � '� � a t , , � �'. ��1+''r�:� �k s 3�,r �, ,�,�1"�>�y�A�a��s�� ..��..AC'� �' �C - J'�'�W.. �i I i�+ r�J.Q P� ,h.. � � � t'� ,:�'"' . J � ^.. .� +F 7 W � a � z � � c �� / `ti ��y� �B '� �} �' j'+7 `'7 ? �,1", �7 �3.' � t� µ t Y�I'-' �11 1.��yV'° ( � � �/` �j'W � Y y�'�� '�. .� �,+. 1 ��.� b. � ilf -.�f�' � �v�A tl � s ?w �t "f }�, �g �+� � � , f 1� '}� ��n � p ,!. .� � � y�y�,� � � a� rn y s � �a - :s� rn,;. � i ti��1� ..'?� � lf .n � A.�;'� t �, �,�� 1 -� T �� :. �.s%,. �� t ki�i�� b.}. } ..;��' y,� r ��r��,.�n �.��y .C�,t� �4 ��.�M�� lt�P+.'(."�a�� n�i h� y �� . h9'�y�'�L� 1!M t 4 y �$ . r� i b �,a" �'�.a'ta1 . �.'�,l t ��S r �� ° y ' . �T�`�1+.4�S� f�,+�"F �ac }1;. � o�• � m �. r�q t ,, a K tEy• ti vi ' a i ' , 2� �" ,�� i _ - 't��Ei �� w `� �kvt�'�''�s'��.'�I�a • Y� ,;r'±',�,i�� il�� 4jti � i I *" �� , , �' ,r;h � � rz �t �`�x� � , t t.�r,� �' ��j,��'��. �3� , ''� �'�� . ��r*�.. r e'C v� 1' � . � �' � �..v ck'�"��k1 n �- �y a s �� r• :5 �il . W7!�Yn ��,�'g,t�, ...,a v+._Y � M b ��?��7• ,�y; �AiF ��r? � ��5.... r,�,;Y_.r '$ �� r�r ,�^!r4 J t4l .:tl`++� .La Yi �' iyd344L'7�"F�� '.c / � .r., �J� �•d�"I .a'.r' � ?; tr !�� J, li � � � � t�� r�q, i r i..; 1 rr r �' &�'f �i J}� ��2��,4� �r � � �,� i �� t, � rr s." t F� �t�F�� t ��t �� 1 ��i �-.,�f�i�,, .��y��° �-�4�� t� 5� ��;P�� l'��"��:��5� �y�� r ; yn{ : 1 ,,,'�` s�it t ' � { � J?,� �'4 .r�w ��.�j / '��' 'y�". : , r ^• ,�� ;}��. �. t�j,,. I,� 4 R T +..! � ;r . ... ai� �i �a. . :.i',� a �.� d �. M�n..'"'je.'+`niF".'. � � ��.i;�r . r� �1jle�.. 1�"�y �'-1�.`�V � T k: � °d� ��?'- �br��'' tt;:,;y S �t'r r .i. a_1 . S� P�� ' :F��.�"r -�s:d°' T.! . 'i<' � �. � � � g �Ary ��i e ' � �. `�5. .y Y�, �� .r �� A�{ ;,�� t R � i +-• '^ � �� w t 1 � � �`�� i� �� _S�� .a, ,�� `�� ` Jt "� a<�. � � � tt9�e �,\ � s�`'r �1�7�t�l� ��ii _ �� '•��v S. S �y�.- ,� 1 ,�.�4,. .' ��.�,� u .t�, �C�' V v•�� e;, f"'• � � ,�, t�y y1 f � � �,�r� � �K.,��. •.y. ��t !� � � �VC�� ! � t. ��`� ��'�'�' .,t.�'v. ��3- � 4 { $� 3� . 4 3 ",r ;�y'�1�,; � ��,�'��z� �, w � � V.,�Y �� ` � �.�'y��J .�.-�e.'�f,�a. .? S�� '��'+{�ri� �S��R�v.� .lY { 'Ji sVl „X- �` � .;,��,��fi .` ta ,,. ��s �\;'�1� �s��'h i �.i?� :�'�- Y11+� �� .��•�`�',ra�'��;,.a ��yy��,�I� k_ 1��t �� .(S�� vt,. ��.it��'�'� '�'��,-,}�' ��C ,iFy ..}'_` r.r;a� - •t r��' �r-•..s.^cy �„Ly'c �_i'��, �� `�'� ..S J�1` 4 •;`°>. . �� b� �' p• '��' i ' .kY �b � �',�' 1' {�... rl� i��'. . 3i�� E�! .�� '�a��'�+ �1 J �yys\� p y , �� ,;� •a� r� b�qi�. �. 4.t.k� � � �`�+s. i � '3,:'t �p i "'4�k,�4t.�. ��.Xi'�� 4j ��1 L��_ '{ �� • R.�.� ' � ��f� C�y�� tk �Pr..��,'�R.`�� ;s, � f'b��JE,' �`��.`� ��P p _ e'�,� e��y�� ''�', x � Y'� � � `� � � q�: �``i �' �+ 4��f��' A�.�l�y ��i _. P�s`, W .. _+ y t t'R 74��, ,� '.. { ,�r��.1�� ,;�� 4,��c'�� `7�`LY.. .y{• *.rfai��` '! �m��tia.ti� .~ � '�:��'�+ S'� �R!}� R.�°j�' ,s':�t i``y+s "v`��1��,,.��e^� � y „c w.+;�c ��r� ,•:'�h,��%•��r . �...A:.Ni_ _� L� ._ . .��. �r�� 4 '�:� ! t Wetland B — East Transect (Transect 1) South Boundary Looking Northeast � N Not to Scale Figure 8. Ground Photograph I\�1� � \ Wetland B at East Transect lI � Spnng Hill Golf Club �' � � �' E' Orono, Minnesota S � GES Project No. 2011.036 Graham Environmental Services, Inc. -... , '�� , ,� •�. ��"� � ` 'P�;a�. f. .� .��-�� \, � � , r '.}'.. �3 r :r 4 -� ., � �P ._ � ° ��, ��'{.. �� ' , q'.. , y ,� ��„ � �_, `"C��1` �K� , y��..�ia \,. �':f.� u �;� ,�r��' � �� n � �� f� �1. :S" �46 /„ r�.� �i�� - P s'_' � ��J �} J `'�� 't � .� q � ; " r�,�, / j�� . . �,r-...4., ri;-. t�.,,,� ..`'�� . , ..!' � ��+y`F��`j. ?`y�+v��i�� ,t�� ^�"��+�"�� .. , ��f ,,�C=:: .'��'_.,, , ,� i ��. ,.• �, J;�'; � �'�t�• '�,. ' k.,` 1 ,� ', g �' '�y, �iy. _ 1 ��., i � f T � S� ��`:k+,�� `.. .��t .,��ci:. ;.. y�'- . ,.. � - '� . �� "� . , . , � �� r �t }I��}� 4 � + � � � ' 1 f` !lY �he � �l� , , '�•c '�� y �f� �q ��y rv . i � . , �. t��x � � ' '. � y . � �� .7 1 �� 1 ? S �r � ' �+ p�, �' �r ..t � 7 '7�' it . }�-� � . . , ' , �_ � . . ,n.�i , I .. �_�, �',�M 4 v lj � tt`�; F '� a Y� ) , a 1 ,<�� J �,r'n� i� .�f.�t 1 I4t�. '� �,�� • ' �� ' ''" a k{ � ) fJ 4�,Y. . � � i, , � r -�(pT� ��= � +,y�, '}5� �'� �� ,i�1�LY.J��Ljl F5'��'� ,�w t ib.\s�f��'�`+1 ' ,1 y .°y��'�i4 +��F� 'k. ��lr).1"E � �..`1� �'.�.�i S J A .� ' �, +�� M 4 �y� �'1�r ' �t Z � � �y� � ['��= 47 �.�:�r�(i f-��d��! +i�� 3r�G`�+'�.Rr' � r f '` r'k„'�f 1. � �p�p /�. r ��.�°it�� 4r 6 ��ji '� C G'.�.�,'�{,��aY �'� i' � 1. .r11� �,.. rv.a �� *'��. � �R�.�r; y� �� r `�` .�{� � � � �{ a1;:��9� /'� "a�th' }�� }d�:�ks��'t k>.k�;� �y�� 1�� .'��'1 ,r�'Pi #�.��',4'" 1� ai�'� �� {_r ��f� `�-� 2� 't� � 'il�,'V '` ��s��., 9 e 7 _ �r ;s��* F��`!� � `�,F�+� � �.�� ;��,yfS��Z�47 T 4� '� '� "� + i, l�rat�.';� FQ91 �y ,y'.. 'i i 5i� t7� � � � yna3��', $. � 6 .t., f� yi,,�ln ,��1.� 4•+,1� � � t � � �� ,v �s- �,� 3"1 w � ' i s1', � ,l+''�'�� w4�`.f/i-��af!� i i�i� ��,-1C � - �1��`�fic 4 ��A ��ti� � -� r .�'e+��1 °�� t'�yr�R►l <„f:�'�'. � i 3f '' �`�.:/►t� t��r'9t r4 v �'��r�, �, .3i �� w'l' 4� y f,.�'e n i }� ��I{t ��, � 1' t�f ��/Y: t_, � -bE,z'o• �� c�+rkl � ��.� +VE .�y"'^ .T.��Y} �, +'� i�7��L t��&N!s-� �.� i i'i9 t� ,�+1 �s. �; � �f�,'�,p v� M, .�*�� 7i� � `�#i�f�'y r '"�fr,�`+s7t 5yK �� 4 r , � /�`'r �. ��a�T-•"*''.C�6'*�"- ^�.K'.�'r '�d.° �.,,, . �g�� ,�r�.�� .��.,; .y�,.:w��e-1� �5 � �r+ as�s.*�� ,c,�y` iii�,� �v f�'� t �_ � � '''r y�"�+�'� �� ci'%�! �z r � f� y�`•�k°�k� e�9��t9 .*.. ��, r'o� 5:fh)��fJ 1r�y�I�,j��. ry`�'�.' 't�' . ,,�}�. �'=i1��: , �..k. � ,�y_'S� . n �� .L�19N� ',� � 4J '`xj' t �yy� :.,if�..:": �i!'�N��,�1'�� '�r'.'�.N� � ��%.s� � -- ��':�ar �� ] �wr� ��y ;•,i i. � �k s15R'y vk.�^ r...�edF� ,� . : '4'� /.:td�.�4's" � « f, }�y r �� ,� �r .- F `�� ry�',Q'T'�s +�i��AVI,�f�3�i .'�� rS -�+ $i ��.�4� �ak.�„�'S"� y� �.�'�? '�,,�p��r,�:ti;�ka�" �'� �" +e��°'",� . -�" e�r�+p� t '� -r'+''��,� ��,�''�;�&-,r�9ye '�� 'e�`��y� � � ��'��1 �� 't,f F ��d'� wy'SS ac �.� i� + �i s ♦ �d ' .�y��w r ,�� !A� 4 �'s u,� �.�` � ,��y� "�� ., � .tS� s�r �3/ �I #`r �'.:a ��,�r��R��. f�h J��?�. t'�� ,� ,y <"' ��j%v�R ��y��,�.�K..�3 ��r�� N'.��J � .-�l�'< �n' �. � ��r; � ^G�{ l,�. . y,�,�� '� ��`4� ..�"'�r,�rv�/�:~. '�A � y ��`.��,}.�v i t�� t��r,✓ �i97�+f t v,,, ...r �^ � AY �;�:,, d �ey�'�•�� _:«X 4 ✓fi.r r�' �i+Y'k . �_ -- �•.. . ' '� r 1 .."�i. 11 ^Y{'+ . . � �i .� --.��;��,�� `-. � �, '` �x ^ � . �� .;��-+� �..,�.�.:�:._ . �} 4 A,- , �., o..�, _ _ .�, �. _�� Wetland B — West Transect (Transect 2) South Boundary Looking Northwest A N Not to Scale Figure 9. Ground Photograph \� � � \ Wetland B at West Transect I1� � Spring Hill Golf Club �,� � - � Orono, Minnesota S � GES Project No. 2011.036 Graham Environmental Services, Inc. Append ix A Wetland A-Transect 1 Wetland Data WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Midwest Region ProjecUSite Spring Hill Golf Club City/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: 10/24/11 ApplicanUOwner: Spring Hill Golf Club State: MN Sampling Point: Transect 1 -Wetland Investigator(s): MJG Section,Township, Range: Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Local relief(concave, convex, none): Slope(%): Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name VWI Classification: Are climatiGhydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? (If no,explain in remarks) Are vegetation ,soil ,or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances" Are vegetation ,soil ,or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed,explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetlan� Y Wetland hydrology present? Y f yes,optional wetland site ID: Remarks:(Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) VEGETATION--Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator pominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) %Cover Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 1 (A) 2 Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 1 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100.00% (A/B) 0 =Total Cover Sa�lina/Shrub stratun (Plot size: ) Prevalence Index Worksheet � Total%Cover of: 2 OBL species 144 x 1 = 144 3 FACW species 10 x 2= 20 4 FAC species 0 x 3= 0 5 FACU species 0 x 4= 0 0 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 5-ft. radius ) Column totals 154 (A) 164 (B) 1 Lemna minor 80 Y OBL Prevalence Index=B/A= 1.06 2 Typha x glauca 30 N OBL 3 Typha angustifolia 30 N OBL Hydrophytic Vegetatlon Indicators: 4 Phalaris arundinacea 10 N FACW Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 Polygonum amphibium 2 N OBL X Dominance test is>50% 6 Bidens cemuus 1 N OBL X Prevalence index is s3.0* 7 Lythrum sa/icana 1 N OBL $ Morphogical adaptations*(provide supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* 154 =Total Cover (explain) WOOdV vine StfatUm (PIOt Size: ) "Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 1 present,unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic 0 =Total Cover vegetation present? Y Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Wetland A-Transect 1 Wetland Data SOIL Sampling Point: •ansect 1 -Wetlar Profile DescMption: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or conflrm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type* Loc** Texture Remarks 0-4 10YR 2/1 silt loam 4-10 4/10GY 10YR 4/6 20 C M clay loam 10-20 10YR 2/1 silt loam *Type:C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Solls: Histisol(A1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L,R) Histic Epipedon(A2) Sandy Redox(S5) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L) Bladc Histic(A3) Stripped Matrix(S6) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R) Stratified Layers(A5) X Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Very Shallow Daric Surface(TF12) 2 cm Muck(A10) Depleted Matrix(F3) Other(explain in remarks) X Depleted Below Daric Surface(A11) Redox Dark Surface(F6) Thidc Dark SurFace(Al2) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand Sandy Mudcy Mineral(S1) _Redox Depressions(FS) hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or _5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) problematic Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Hydric soil present? Y Depth(inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primarv Indicators(minimum of one is reauired�check all that a�olv) Secondarv Indicators(minimum of two reauiredl X Surface Water(A1) Aquatic Fauna(B13) Surface Soil Cracks(B6) X High Water Table(A2) True Aquatic Plants(614) Drainage Patterns(610) X Saturation(A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(61) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Cra�sh Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(B2) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(B3) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils X Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(65) (C6) FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(67) Thin Muck Surface(C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surtace(B8) Gauge or Well Data(D9) Water-Stained Leaves(B9) Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 14 WeUand Water table present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 6 hydrology Saturation present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 5 presentl Y (inGudes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data(stream gauge, monitoring well,aerial photos, previous inspections),if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Wetland A-Transect 1 Upland Data WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Midwest Region Project/Site Spring Hill Golf Club City/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: 10/24/11 ApplicanUOwner: Spring Hill Golf Club State: MN Sampling Point: Transect 1 -Upland Investigator(s): MJG Section,Township, Range: Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Local relief(concave,convex, none): Slope(%): Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name VWI Classification: Are climatiGhydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? (If no,explain in remarks) Are vegetation ,soil ,or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances" Are vegetation ,soil ,or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed,explain any answers in remarics.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Hydric soil present? N Is the sampled area within a weUan� N Wetland hydrology present? N f yes,optional wetland site ID: Remarks:(Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) VEGETATION--Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator pominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) %Cover Species Staus Number of Dominant Species 1 that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 1 (A) 2 Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 1 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100.00% (A/B) 0 =Total Cover Saqlina/Shrub stratun (Plot size: ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Total%Cover of: 2 OBL species 0 x 1 = 0 3 FACW species 0 x 2= 0 4 FAC species 100 x 3= 300 5 FACU species 0 x 4= 0 0 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 5-ft. radius ) Column totals 100 (A) 300 (B) 1 Poa pratensis 100 Y FAC Prevalence Index=B/A= 3.00 2 3 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 X Dominance test is>50% 6 X Prevalence index is 53.0* 7 $ Morphogical adaptations'(provide supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* 100 =Total Cover (explain) WOOdv vine StPatum (Plot Size: ) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 1 present,unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic 0 =Total Cover vegetation present? Y Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) Mowed upland fairway planted to Poa pratensis per golf course manager. US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Wetland A-Transect 1 Upland Data SOIL Sampling Point: 'ransect 1 -Uplan Proflle Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confrtn the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type" Loc** Texture Remarks 0-18 10YR 2/1-3/3 mixed clay loam fill soils are mixed fill *Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol(A1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L,R) Histic Epipedon(A2) Sandy Redox(S5) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L) Bladc Histic(A3) Stripped Matrix(S6) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R) Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) 2 cm Muck(A10) Depleted Matrix(F3) Other(explain in remarks) Depleted Below Dark SurFace(A11) Redox Dark Surface(F6) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Daric Surface(F7) Rlndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand Sandy Mudcy Mineral(S1) _Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or _5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) problematic Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Hydric soil present? N Depth(inches): Remarks: Soils consist of mixed fill from past fairway construction. Some mottles noted in fill material believed to be relict. HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primarv Indicators(minimum of one is reauired:check all that aoqlv) Secondarv Indicators(minimum of two reauired) Surface Water(A1) Aquatic Fauna(613) Surface Soil Cradcs(66) High Water Table(A2) True Aquatic Plants(B14) Drainage Patterns(610) Saturation(A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(61) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Cra�sh Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(62) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(B3) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(64) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(B5) (C6) FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Inundation�sible on Aerial Imagery(67) Thin Muck Surface(C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(68) Gauge or Well Data(D9) Water-Stained Leaves(69) Other(F�cplain in Remarks) Field Observations: SurFace water present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Water table present? Yes No X Depth(inches): hydrology Saturation present? Yes No X Depth(inches): present? N (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data(stream gauge, monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Wetland B-Transect 1 Wetland Data WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Midwest Region Project/Site Spring Hill Golf Club City/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: 10/24/11 ApplicanUOwner: Spring Hill Golf Club State: MN Sampling Point: Transect 1 -Wetland Investigator(s): MJG Section,Township, Range: Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Local relief(concave,convex, none): Slope(%): Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name VWI Classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? (If no,explain in remarks) Are vegetation ,soil ,or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances" Are vegetation ,soil ,or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed,explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetlan� Y Wetland hydrology present? Y f yes,optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (Explain altemative procedures here or in a separate report.) VEGETATION--Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator pominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) %Cover Species Staus Number of Dominant Species � that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 1 (A) 2 Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 1 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100.00% (A/B) 0 =Total Cover Saplina/Shrub stratun (Plot size: ) Prevalence Index Worksheet � Total%Cover of: 2 OBL species 15 x 1 = 15 3 FACW species 80 x 2= 160 4 FAC species 5 x 3= 15 5 FACU species 0 x 4= 0 0 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 5-ft.radius ) Column totals 100 (A) 190 (B) 1 Phalaris anindinacea 75 Y FACW Prevalence Index=B/A= 1.90 2 Caiex lacustris 10 N OBL 3 Solanum dulcamara 5 N FAC Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Typha x glauca 5 N OBL Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 Comus racemosa 5 N FACW X Dominance test is>50% 6 X Prevalence index is 53.0* 7 Morphogical adaptations"(provide 8 supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* 100 =Total Cover (explain) WOOdv vine St�atum (PIOt Size: ) `Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be � present,unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic 0 =Total Cover vegetation present? Y Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Wetland B-Transect 1 Wetland Data SOIL Sampling Point: •ansect 1 -Wetlar Proflle Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type* Loc** Texture Remarks 0-20 N 2/0 Mudcy loam *Type:C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol(A1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L,'R) Histic Epipedon(A2) Sandy Redox(S5) Daric SurFace(S7)(LRR K,L) Black Histic(A3) Stripped Matrix(S6) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) X Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R) Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) 2 cm Muck(A10) Depleted Matrix(F3) Other(explain in remarks) Depleted Below Daric Surface(A11) Redox Daric Surface(F6) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Dark SurFace(F7) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand Sandy Mudcy Mineral(S1) _Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present,unless disturbed or _5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) problematic Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Hydric soil present? Y Depth(inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primarv Indicators(minimum of one is reauired�check all that a��lvl Secondarv Indicators(minimum of two reauired) X SurFace Water(A1) Aquatic Fauna(613) SurFace Soil Cradcs(66) X High Water Table(A2) True Aquatic Plants(614) Drainage Patterns(B10) X Saturation(A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(61) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Cra�sh Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(62) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(B3) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(64) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils X Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(B5) (C6) FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(67) Thin Muck Surface(C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(68) Gauge or Well Data(D9) Water-Stained Leaves(69) Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 10 WeUand Water table present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 6 hydrology Saturation present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 5 present? Y (inGudes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data(stream gauge, monitoring well,aerial photos, previous inspections),if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Wetland B-Transect 1 Upland Data WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Midwest Region Project/Site Spring Hill Golf Club City/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: 10/24/11 ApplicanUOwner: Spring Hill Golf Club State: MN Sampling Point: Transect 1 -Upland Investigator(s): MJG Section,Township, Range: Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Local relief(concave,convex, none): Slope(%): Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name VWI Classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? (If no,explain in remarks) Are vegetation ,soil ,or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances" Are vegetation ,soil ,or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed,explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? N Hydric soil present? N Is the sampled area within a wetlani N Wetland hydrology present? N f yes,optional wetland site ID: Remarks:(Explain alternative procedures here or in a separate report.) VEGETATION--Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator pominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) %Cover Species Staus Number of Dominant Species � that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 1 (A) 2 Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 4 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 25.00% (A/B) 0 =Total Cover Sa�lina/Shrub stratun (Plot size: 15-ft. radius ) Prevalence Index Worksheet 1 Rhus hirta 20 Y UPL Total%Cover of: 2 Quercus rubra 5 Y FACU OBL species 10 x 1 = 10 3 FACW species 35 x 2= 70 4 FAC species 0 x 3= 0 5 FACU species 5 x 4= 20 25 =Total Cover UPL species 80 x 5= 400 Herb stratum (Plot size: 5-ft. radius ) Column totals 130 (A) 500 (B) 1 Bromus inermis 60 Y UPL Prevalence Index=B!A= 3.85 2 Comus racemosa 25 Y FACW 3 Phalaris anindinacea 10 N FACW Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Carex lacustris 10 N OBL Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 Dominance test is>50% 6 Prevalence index is 53.0* 7 8 Morphogical adaptations*(provide supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* 105 =Total Cover (explain) Woodv vine stratum (PIOt SiZe: ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be � present,unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic 0 =Total Cover vegetation present? N Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Wetland B-Transect 1 Upland Data SOIL Sampling Point: 'ransect 1 -Uplan Proflle Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or conflrtn the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type* Loc"" Texture Remarks 0-14 10YR 3/2 fine sandy loam 14-24 10YR 3/3 loamy fine sand *Type:C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM= Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol(A1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L,R) Histic Epipedon(A2) Sandy Redox(S5) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L) Black Histic(A3) Stripped Matrix(S6) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R) Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) 2 cm Muck(A10) Depleted Matrix(F3) Other(explain in remarks) Depleted Below Daric Surface(A11) Redox Dar1c Surface(F6) Thick Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Dar1c Surface(F7) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or _5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) problematic Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Hydric soil presentT N Depth(inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primarv Indicators(minimum of one is reauired�check all that a�plvl Secondarv Indicators(minimum of two reauired) SurFace Water(A1) Aquatic Fauna(613) Surface Soil Cracks(B6) High Water Table(A2) True Aquatic Plants(614) Drainage Patterns(610) Saturation(A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Cra�sh Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(B2) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(63) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(65) (C6) FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(67) Thin Muck Surface(C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(68) Gauge or Well Data(D9) Water-Stained Leaves(69) Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Water table present? Yes No X Depth(inches): hydrology Saturation present? Yes No X Depth(inches): present? N (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Wetland B-West Transect Wetland Data WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM-Midwest Region Project/Site Spring Hill Golf Club City/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: 10/24/11 ApplicanUOwner: Spring Hill Golf Club State: MN Sampling Point: Transect 2-Wetland Investigator(s): MJG Section,Township, Range: Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Local relief(concave,convex, none): Slope(%): Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name VWI Classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? (If no,explain in remarks) Are vegetation ,soil ,or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances" Are vegetation ,soil ,or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed,explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Hydric soil present? Y Is the sampled area within a wetlani Y Wetland hydrology present? Y f yes,optional wetland site ID: Remarks:(Explain altemative procedures here or in a separate report.) VEGETATION--Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator pominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) %Cover Species Staus Number of Dominant Species � that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 4 (A) 2 Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 4 (B) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100.00% (A/B) 0 =Total Cover Saalina/Shrub stratun (Plot size: ) Prevalence Index Worksheet � Total%Cover of: 2 OBL species 95 x 1 = 95 3 FACW species 30 x 2= 60 4 FAC species 0 x 3= 0 5 FACU species 0 x 4= 0 0 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 5-ft. radius ) Column totals 125 (A) 155 (B) 1 Scirpus cyperinus 30 Y OBL Prevalence Index=B/A= 1.24 2 Typha angustifolia 30 Y OBL 3 Carex lacustris 30 Y OBL Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Agrostis gigantea 30 Y FACW Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 Salix nigra 5 N OBL X Dominance test is>50% 6 X Prevalence index is s3.0" 7 $ Morphogical adaptations*(provide supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* 125 =Total Cover (explain) Woodv vine stratum (PIOt SiZ@: ) *Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be 1 present,unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic 0 =Total Cover vegetation present? Y Remarks:(Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Wetland B-West Transect Wetland Data SOIL Sampling Point: �ansect 2-Wetlar Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confrm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) °/a Type* Loc*' Texture Remarks 0-20 N 2/0 Mudcy loam "Type:C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. **Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indtcators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol(A1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L,R) Histic Epipedon(A2) Sandy Redox(S5) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L) Bladc Histic(A3) Stripped Matrix(S6) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) X Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R) Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) 2 cm Muck(A10) Depleted Matrix(F3) Other(explain in remarks) Depleted Below Dartc Surface(A11) Redox Dark Surface(F6) Thidc Dark Surface(Al2) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand Sandy Mudcy Mineral(S1) _Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or _5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) problematic Rest�lctive Layer(if observed): Type: Hydric soil present? Y Depth(inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primarv Indicators(minimum of one is reauired�chedc all that a�nlv) Secondarv Indicators(minimum of two reauiredl Surface Water(A1) Aquatic Fauna(613) Surface Soil Cracks(66) High Water Table(A2) True Aquatic Plants(B14) Drainage Patterns(610) X Saturation(A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(B1) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Cra�sh Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(62) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(63) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(64) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils X Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(B5) (C6) FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) Thin Muck Surface(C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(68) Gauge or Well Data(D9) Water-Stained Leaves(B9) Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Water table present? Yes No X Depth(inches): hydrology Saturation present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 10 present? Y (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data(stream gauge,monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Wetland B-West Transect Upland Data WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM -Midwest Region Project/Site Spring Hill Golf Club City/County: Orono/Hennepin Sampling Date: 10/24/11 ApplicanUOwner: Spring Hill Golf Club State: MN Sampling Point: Transect 2-Upland Investigator(s): MJG Section,Township, Range: Landform(hillslope,terrace,etc.): Local relief(concave, convex, none): Slope(%): Lat: Long: Datum: Soil Map Unit Name VWI Classification: Are climatic/hydrologic conditions of the site typical for this time of the year? (If no,explain in remarks) Are vegetation ,soil ,or hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"normal circumstances" Are vegetation ,soil ,or hydrology naturally problematic? present? Yes SUMMARY OF FINDINGS (If needed,explain any answers in remarks.) Hydrophytic vegetation present? Y Hydric soil present? N Is the sampled area within a weUan� N Wetland hydrology present? N f yes,optional wetland site ID: Remarks: (Explain altemative procedures here or in a separate report.) VEGETATION--Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator pominance Test Worksheet Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) %Cover Species Staus Number of Dominant Species � that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 2 (A) 2 Total Number of Dominant 3 Species Across all Strata: 2 (g) 4 Percent of Dominant Species 5 that are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100.00% (A/B) 0 =Total Cover Sa�linq/Shrub stratun (Plot size: 15-ft. radius ) Prevalence Index Worksheet � Total%Cover of: 2 OBL species 5 x 1 = 5 3 FACW species 0 x 2= 0 4 FAC species 80 x 3= 240 5 FACU species 2 x 4= 8 0 =Total Cover UPL species 0 x 5= 0 Herb stratum (Plot size: 5-ft. radius ) Column totals 87 (A) 253 (B) 1 Panicum virgatum 50 Y FAC Prevalence Index=B/A= 2.91 2 Andropogon gerarclii 30 Y FAC 3 Carox lacustris 5 N OBL Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4 Solidago canadensis 2 N FACU Rapid test for hydrophytic vegetation 5 Ratibida pinnata 2 N NI X Dominance test is>50% 6 X Prevalence index is 53.0"` 7 $ Morphogical adaptations*(provide supporting data in Remarks or on a 9 separate sheet) 10 Problematic hydrophytic vegetation* 89 =Total Cover (explain) Woodv vine stratum (PIOt SiZe: ) "Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be � present,unless disturbed or problematic 2 Hydrophytic 0 =Total Cover vegetatlon present? Y Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet) US Amy Corps of Engineers Midwest Region Wetland B-West Transect Upland Data SOIL Sampling Point: 'ransect 2-Uplan Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (Inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type* Loc" Texture Remarks 0-10 10YR 3/2 fine sandy loam 10-20 10YR 3/3 loamy fine sand *Type:C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, MS=Masked Sand Grains. '*Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix Hydric Soil Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils: Histisol(A1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)(LRR K,L,R) Histic Epipedon(A2) Sandy Redox(S5) Dark Surface(S7)(LRR K,L) Bladc Histic(A3) Stripped Matrix(S6) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3)(LRR K,L,R) Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)(LRR K,L,R) Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2) Very Shallow Dark Surface(TF12) 2 cm Muck(A10) Depleted Matrix(F3) Other(explain in remarks) Depleted Below Dar1c Surface(A11) Redox Dark Surface(F6) Thick Dark SurFace(Al2) Depleted Dark Surface(F7) *Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and weltand Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) _Redox Depressions(F8) hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) problematic Restrictive Layer(if observed): Type: Hydric soil present? N Depth(inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY WeUand Hydrology Indicators: Primarv Indicators(minimum of one is reauired�check all that a4olv) Secondarv Indicators(minimum of two reauired) Surface Water(A1) Aquatic Fauna(B13) SurFace Soil Cradcs(66) High Water Table(A2) True Aquatic Plants(B14) Drainage Patterns(610) Saturation(A3) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Dry-Season Water Table(C2) Water Marks(61) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots Cra�sh Burrows(C8) Sediment Deposits(62) (C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9) Drift Deposits(B3) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1) Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils Geomorphic Position(D2) Iron Deposits(65) (C6) FAC-Neutral Test(D5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(67) Thin Muck Surface(C7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) Gauge or Well Data(D9) Water-Stained Leaves(B9) Other(Explain in Remarks) Field Observations: Surface water present? Yes No X Depth(inches): WeUand Water table present? Yes No X Depth(inches): hydrology Saturation present? Yes No X Depth(inches): present? N (includes capillary fringe) Describe recorded data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region