HomeMy WebLinkAboutRe: inspection of fire alarm system c�rr c�
Q T ��C^,o +
r�Ce����:w;
� MONITORING
���: 2 � �.Q�� SYSTEMS, INC.
Date : October 18 , 1991
'I'o: Fire Marshall
F'rom: D7onitoring Systems, Division of Pro-Tec Design, Inc .
Subject : Inspection of Fire Alarm Systems and Repairs .
This is to inform you that the Fire Alarm Systems have been
ins��cted at:
Spring Hill Center
175 County Road 6
Orono, Mn '
Date of Inspection: October 17 , 1991
Repairs completed on: Repairs to be made ASAP.
Inspection Technician: Roger Biernmaier
Any questions concerning problems or the work performed,
please call me at 553-1180 .
,,����� L���
Stephen Vick
Service Manager
Monitor_ing 5ystems
Service Division of Pro-Tec Design, Inc.
Z405 Annapolis Lane
Minneapolis, MN 55441 �L
612-553-1180
�
�
2405 ANNAPOLIS LANE
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55441
MONITORING 612-553-1180
SYSTEMS, INC.
Name of Property ^ �'�t Report # �-�
Property Address n ,
Receiving Station Notified ,�es no Time ' ,a � Date /v -i z- 9 (
Receiving Station Phone # ����-705�� Contact Person
i
1. Equipment manufactured by G✓�.p-y W� �t Model # Serial #
2. Is control panel free of dust and dirt? (yes) no)
3. Is AC power on? (yes) (no)
4. Do control panel switches work correctly? (yes) (no)
5. Type of batteries - Size �-/�-V. (�e�/S , Amp Hours �� v
6. Are battery contacts clean? (yes) (no)
7. If dry cells, were they replaced? (yes) (no)
8. If trickle charged, charge voltage is o7�• � at �� � � ohms load
9. Battery test voltage is �.y��, �i under y��, / load
10. Are there any abnormal conditions when transferring from AC power to
battery standby? (yes) �g„�,�
11. If yes, list problem
12. Is AC power supplied with a lock off device? (yes)
13. A.) Does system have a trouble light? (yes) (no)
B.) Does trouble light work correctly? (yes) (no)
14. A.) Does system have an audible trouble device? (yes) (no)
B.) Does audible trouble device work correctly? (yes) (no)
15. A.) Are the system's circuits electrically supervised? (yes) (no)
B.) Does system's supervision work correctly? (yes) (no)
16. A.) Zs AC power supervised? (yes) (no)
B.) Does AC power's supervision work correctly? (yes) (no)
17. A.) Is DC power supervised? (yes) (no)
B.) Does DC power's supervision work correctly? (yes) (no)
18. System Initiating Devices
Cleaning and
When tested sends signal maintenance
List below type Restorable or Now tested appropriately and/or performed
of alarm initiating unrestorable ref. NFPA 72E properly activates aux. according to
uan. device t pe Chapter 8 equipment NFPA 72E-Describe
�3 � s �o ,. e S Sn'�ol�-e� Yes ( k) No ( ) NA ( )
.Z '�ta.�Fi o C� w��e Yes ( No O NA O
tc. �.,'S �r,�o�c-�- Yes No ( ) NA ( )
`:6 � Oc ,� !;; Yes ( ) No ( ) NA ( )
Yes ( ) No ( ) NA ( )
Yes ( ) No ( ) NA ( )
Yes ( ) No ( ) NA ( )
Yes ( ) No ( ) NA ( )
19. Other tests as required by equipment manufacturers:
20. Are all alarm initiating devices in good condition, unobstructed, free
of damage or corrosion? (yes) (no)
21. Are all alarm initiating devices LISTED equipment, for the purpose they
are being used? (yes) (no)
22. Are there any recent changes to the structure that require additional
protection? (yes) (�
23. Are there any local detection devices independent of the automatic alarm
system? (yes) no)
24. A.) If yes to 20, how many were tested? ��lO
B.) Were they all working correctly? (yes) no
C.) List type of cleaning and maintenance performed
25. Is wiring properly supported and in good condition? (yes) (no)
26. A.) ?^]here conduit is used, are solid connections made? (yes) (no)
B.) Is conduit properly supported? � , (yes) � (no)
27. Does system signal local (X ) central station (�:� propri tory O
28. If central or porprietory, were signals corr�ctly received? ��yes (no)
�'"4'�; '' a, '�/�, �"'�'��T���^�4F7.�•T�^'�'uRtlk!4��,��,' �..'a�f,".T'^��;��'t�''�'�A�"':•-sgµ•yJ�xiriA�Si�;a`�ir�A�^a�11'�a�'J'r v:a'isc+�c ,:,;,S;,rt:+',. '.-��";,.;y,.�,
^ . ,y . r
T � .S��.,.� ht 1 i I
�� , �
MONITORING SYSTEMS INC. ALARM SYSTEM INSPECTION REPORT
29. A.) Does system have local audible devices? (yes)' (no)
B.) Does system have zoned audible devices? , : (yes) (no)
C.) List type of audible devices ���_:>, � Quantity: � �
D.) Do all audible devices work correctly? yes) Cno
30. A.) Does system have local visual indicators? (yes) (no)
B.) Does system have zoned visual indicators? (yes) (no)
C.) List type of visual indicators _.�..t..=,_ ,,,,t ��.,,-;-: Quantity: � �
D.) Do all visual indicators work correctly? yes) (no)
31. A.) Does system have a pre-signal feature? (yes) c(no)
B.) If yes, does pre-signal feature work correctly? (yes) (no)
32. A.) Is this a coded system? (yes) (no)
B.) Do codes work and correspond correctly to facility map? (yes) (no)
33. A.) Is this a zoned system? (yes) (no)
B.) Number of zones on system: /�.
C.) Do all zones work correctly? (yes (no)
34. Zone No. Detector Type uan. I,00p Res. Zone No. Detector Type uan. Loop Res.
� i_}-,n.'� /. �.' .
� ��� ,
�
� l�_
�'� � ! i
c�, ,
35. A.) Does system have a remote annunciator? (yes) (no)
B.) Does system annunciator work correctly? (yes) (no)
36. List the items requiring repairs that were corrected at the time of this inspection:
`�id�,
37. List all abnormal conditions found but not corrected at the time of this inspection:
rt o� :J�- a� � �
� '7�� ' S� . '
_ -•t'ha��c
.'{�� 5 L o L .
i
fIJO No(r� C;_ `1 F, rfid, t�
38. Was owner/management notified of conditions not corrected? (yes) (no)
39. Approval for repairs was given by: Date / /
40. Abnormal conditions listed above were corrected on • Date / /
41. Owner denied approval to correct the abnormal conditions? (yes) (no)
42. Receiving station notified of completion? (yes) (no) Time: ' "
43. Authority having jurisdiction: Name:
Address:
Date copy sent / / Representative:
F
INSPECTION DISCLAIMER
This inspection report done by Monitoring Systems Inc. does not imply any warranties to the system. The
purpose of this inspection is only to test for proper operation of the system, at the time of this in-
spection only, and does not warranty its continued operation to be correct and trouble free. There are
no obligations or liabilities on the part of Monitoring Systems Inc. for the consequential damages ari-
sing out of or in connection with the use or performance of the alarm system or other indirect damages
with respect to loss of life, property, revenue or profit or cost of removal, installation or reinstal-
lation.
44. As the inspecting agent, I have thoroua,fP�ly checked the above minimum requirements, and to the best
of my knowledge, all statements are tru2.
� r .
M.S.I. Inspecting agent signature: �����t�,�_
45. Acknowledged by Building Management sigi�ature: