The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2014-00540 - addn/remodel/repair � ` CITY OF ORONO 2750 KELLEY PARKWAY * z 0 1 4 - 0 0 5 4 0 * DATE [SSUED: 10/14/2014 ORONO, MN 55356- (952) 249-4600 FAX: (952) 249-4616 ADDRESS : 3384 SHORELINE DR PIN : 17-117-23-44-0100 LEGAL DESC : TOWNSITE OF LANGDON PARK : LOT 005 BLOCK 003 PERMIT TYPE : ADDITION/REMODEL/REPAIR PROPERTY TYPE : COMMERCIAL-BUSINESS CONSTRUCTION TYPE : ADDN/REMODEL/REPAIR ACTIVITY : 3 = S 3,2`7 �`Q/-t'S � VALUAT[ON : $ ]0,000.00 ��']� S.at� • NOTE: SEPARATE PERMI"CS RI?QUIRED: t;LEC"IR[CAL(STATk;) VESTIBULE REAR APPLICANT PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE 191.75 Narrows LLC PLAN REVIEW 124.64 PO BOX 36 STATE SURCHARGE(VALUATION) 5.00 NAVARRE, MN 55392- TOTAL 321.39 Payment(s) CHECK 3125 321.39 OWNER Narrows LLC PO BOX 36 NAVARRE, MN 55392- AGREEMENT AND SWORN STATEMENT The work for which this permit is issued shall bc performed according to thc approved plans and specitications,applicable City approvals,and the State Building Code. This perniit is Yor only the work described and does not grant permission for additional or related work which requires separatc permits. All provisions oY laws and ordinances governing this type of work shall be compied with whether or not specified herein."Chis permit will expire and become null and void if construction authorized is not commenced within 180 days of the date of issuance,or if construction is suspended for a period of 180 days at any time after work has commeneed. ihe applicant is responsible for assuring all required inspections are requested in conformance with the State Building Code.This permit may be revoked at y time for due cause. �CJ // // p ican rm tee Sig ur Date Is ed By Signature Date � t� CITY OF ORONO � �� BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION�-� � FOR NEW STRUCTURES OR ADDITIONS �O ` Mailing Address: Permit number: �� I�TO PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Date received: 9' —� Sfreet Address:� Received by: y � 2750 Kelley Parkway Plan review fee: � `�� ,� Orono, MN 55356 �KESH�� l � Total Fee: Main: 952-249-4600 Fax: 952-249-4616 www.ci.orono.mn.us This application form must be completed in full and all required information must be submitted. Incomplete applications will be returned. (Please print) GENERAL INFORMATION: Job Site Address: 3 3 �� G o i� /�h � �<�' - Will this be a Parade of Homes, Remodelers Showcase Home or other Display Home? ❑ Yes [�I'�o If yes, a specia/event permit is required with Polrce Department and City Council approval 60 days prior to the event. Shuttle bus service will be required unless applicant demonstrates su�cient on-site parking is available. Non-permitted events will not be allowed. CONTRACTOR/APPLI NT INFO ATI N: Name: �i /�2 C - State License# Expiration Date: Phone: cell office Mailing Address: O , Cit : �;� � > ZIP: , `"� Contact Person: � _ ,� ' Applicant is: Contractor / Homeowner (Circle One) Email and/or Fax: . PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION: Name: � � �- �i r � Phone (day): , l ��/ 1� Address: h �'7 O �' �'. � �.� � �_1�� `JlN" �iP: ��-� 1 � Email and/or Fax � ;;,,�_y�s.«,�>� � l� �,-�-j�,-, �L�� ARCHITECT/ ENGINEER INFORMATION: I � Name: 1� :-��r � � h � 7,,,-, �� _ J , � � �, - . Phone (day): r� /� - z 27�-- — ,L( G/"3 (� ��IP: Address: �� Email and/or Fax: � PROJECT INFORMATION: Description of project n��P� fl, ��' � >� ::� - — �z.��'` 1.Type of Project 2. Proposed Use 3.: vage Disposal 8 Water Supply ❑ New Construction ❑ Single Family with ❑ Residence �Addition attached garage ❑Garage/Accessory Bldg. ❑ Public Sewer ccessory Building ❑ Single Family with ❑ Deck ❑ Relocation detached garage ❑ Office/Commercial ❑ Private Sewer ❑ Other: (specify) �C �t,2 ❑ Multiple Family/Condo ❑Warehouse ❑ Public ❑ Storage ❑ Public Water ""`Any earth movement may also require ❑ Commercial ❑ Other(specify) MCWD review 8�permits. ❑ Industrial ❑ Private Well Minnehaha Creek Watershed District(MCWD) ❑ Other: (SpeCify) 18202 Minnetonka Blvd Deephaven, MN 55391 Phone: 952-471-0590 Fax: 952-471-0682 www.minnehahacreek.or Estimated Construction Valuation (excluding land) $ / d G�O v �r STRUCTURE INFORMATION: 1.Structure Dimensions 1. Structure Dimensions (continued) 2.Type of Construction a. Length (ft.)= Number of bedrooms= �Wood/Frame b.Width (ft.}= Number of garage stalls: ❑ Masonry Areas in sauare feet Attached= ❑ Metal ❑Pole Bldg. c. Basement= Detached= ❑ ICF d. 15t Story = ❑ On-site Prefab e.2"d Story= ❑ Off-site Prefab f. '/2 Story = ❑Other(please specify): g.Total Area= REQUIRED SUBMITTALS: All of the information must be submitted in order for your appfication to be processed: Not Enclosed A licable ❑ ❑ Permit A lication ❑ ❑ Pro osed Buildin Plans ❑ ❑ MN State Ener Code Calculations and Mechanical Code Re uirements Form ❑ ❑ Surve meetin all re uirements ❑ ❑ Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan ❑ ❑ Hardcover Calculation s ❑ ❑ Se tic S stem Site Evaluation Re ort ❑ ❑ Access Permit ❑ ❑ Wetland Buffer fm rovement Plan ❑ ❑ En ineered Plans for Retainin Walls 4 feet or above ❑ ❑ Plan Review Fee ❑ ❑ Application Escrow&Agreement ❑ ❑ Other: APPLICANT/OWNER ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: . Aprees to provide all information required or requested by the Building Department; • Agrees to pay the City of Orono for engineering consultant review costs in ezcess of$500; . Certifies that the informafion supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant recognizes that they are solely responsible for submitting a complete appfication being aware that upon failure to do so, the staff has no alternative but to reject it until it is complete; . Acknowledges the Escrow Agreement is completed and signed; • Understands some or all of the information that you are asked to provide on this applicafion is classified by State law as either private or confidential. Private data is information which generalfy cannot be given to the public but can be given to the subject of the data. Confidential data is information which generally cannot be given to either the public or the subject of the data. Our purpose and intended use of this information is to annually update our records and records of other governmental agencies required by law. If you refuse to supply the information,the application may not be issued. • Agrees that in the event that weather or other conditions prevent the completion of an as-built survey at the time the Certificate of Occupancy is requested, a temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be issued upon receipt of a $10,000 escrow to ensure completion of the as-built survey and all site improvements. Appficant's Signature: Date: � -o�G `"-� � J �._ Date: � r �G � r'� Owner's Signatur . � � � � PLAN REVIEW CHECKLIST FOR NEW STRUCTURES / ADDITIONS Address/Permit Number: ��v U��re�� /�- �• Description of work: ��-f`r��- � v��%�z l�- �i�' Septic review by: Date Approved: �--- � c�ry Zoning review by: Date Approved: /o ! !�/ ,�� Building review by: Date Approved: �� '� " �� /Y Grading review by: Date Approved: /(�� Zoning District: Zoning File#: � ' Reso#: Reso Date: q l,� �d o Zoning: Lot Area: �3'�SF/AC Width:�L_ Lot Cove age: ��3 �E /o Survey Submitted: �'Yes 0 No Date of Survey: D / --aRevised date Pro osed Setbacks: Front(Lake) Rear(Street) ( N S E� ( N S E W ) Other Buildings Wetland Side Side --_ � "+� 3 � .`--_ ..._� �-_ � � Defined Height: 2 Peak Height:� FFE:�-FFE minus 6 feet=�(Existing Contour) Perimeter(linear feet)_ '-'�— 50%_ '--- #of Stories Ok? YES � FOR A BUILDING WITH A BASEMENT OR CRAWL SPACE: The distance between the lowest FOR A BUILDING ON A SLAB FOUNDATION: START WITH proposed floor(of the basement or crawl space)and the highest point of the roof. START WITH The distance between the top of slab and the highest point of the roof. If you have a... If you have a... • GABLE OR HIPPED ROOF(no . GABLE OR HIPPED ROOF(no windows): Subtract half the windows): Subtract half the distance distance between the highest point between the highest point of the roof of the roof to the low point of the to the low point of the corresponding SUBTRACTION corresponding gable or hipped roof SUBTRACTION gable or hipped roof (BASED ON ROOF . GABLE OR HIPPED ROOF(with (BASED ON . GABLE OR HIPPED ROOF(with TYPE) windows): SubVact half the ROOF TYPE) windows): Subtract half the distance distance between the top of the between the top of the highest highest window and the highest window and the highest point of the point of the roof roof • ALL OTHER ROOF TYPES(flat, • ALL OTHER ROOF TYPES(flat, mansard,etc):No subtraction. mansard,etc:No subtraction. ADDITION Add the distance between the top of slab SUBTRACTION Subtract the distance between the (BASED ON and the highest existing grade adjacent to (BASED ON EXISTING basemenUcrawl space floor and the EXISTING the foundation. GRADES) highest existing grade adjacent to the GRADES foundation OR 10 feet(whichever is less). EQUALS Defined building height EQUALS Deflned building height Shoreland District MCWD Permit Receive Avera e Lakeshore Setback Met? Bluff 0 Yes 0 No N/A 0 Yes No Yes � No 0 Yes 0 No N/A Permit Number: Setback: Stormwater Quality Existing Proposed Variance Required CUP Required Overla District Tier Hardcover Hardcover v Yes � No 0 Yes o t �� /� � ! �� TYPe�S)��J� TYPe(S)� NG � Updated: January 2013 v:\forms�plan review checklist 2013.docx REMARKS (in-house): Fees to be Char ed YES NO . Y �,�44 .F a ��' '�� ur,,.�t� t ' 4'�3'N' ?r `�`' #da�fa�X '� �z .�Z.,,��"+.4 ��'1� •: . .c.... .:.,� :: k� �:i ��`��1��,1. »�e`%eta�X° �i��'y� ysv,s:i ss.; �_.. � ,�"+,a.,5 �..� ,'. �. . i. ..u . ., . ., .., .. > .,. Pian Review ��iVR��S�� .`�'i� YFi � '� � r��3 ��i��^,�y�a,��,�.Y �i��C.X,��¢��k'e3. :+;a �C'+'^��Yf'. rNfyN Investigation Fee ;�= a +e a�.�rv�� y� a /,�� f.3�".xYf�s �' r+� t" �,;v f� ^mv'A 9 ,�, �W �++5��z,,a T'� ��Y@T:�"Q��V�.. W,,,3�,.:�:kg.�.;'T'tFs�,�r��jt'r�' � 'a:`ro, ii�,�„s�s.,�'`„x'�..,r x�'x�'�..�^ .�.�, ¥S.5��:: Other(specify) S uare Foota e $ er S uare Foota e Basement X = $ 1�Floor X = $ 2nd Floo� X = $ Garage X = $ Estimated Construction Value_ S (�f��d �� Orono Inspections Required Work Requiring Separate Permits Required State Permits 0 Site 0 Plumbing G Grading/Filling � Well 0 rdcover Removal � Mechanical � Fire Electrical Footing 0 Septic 0 Water Connection � Poured Wall � Fireplace � Sewer Connection ' � Foundation Survey 0 Masonry 0 Lawn Irrigation � Radon Rock Bed C Mfg. Framing O Other(specify) �'Insulation 0 As-Built Survey Final 0 Wetland Buffer � Other(specify) REMARKS (in-house): Other Review: Reviewed by: Date Approved: Access: Existing:�YES 0 NO New: � YES � NO OFFICIAL REMARKS -TO BE NOTED ON PERMIT AND INITIALLED CouN�.c� PQ.oV�1D 1/ Bu� l— a�r !� ��' �� Y` /��3 /�. Updated: January 2013 v:\forms�plan review checklist 2013.docx ,. �,� �� , r �, wr � ._ , �y� . ., , , � � p� . , � , a ^ �� , � i , - , , . .�y,, � < ._ .� � �L}Y' E . .,� < ,.._.. - < `.; ��a `y� . .#&� � a�._.' �� 4 � � .,�. � }�,- �T r' � S t; �. � � �x e �a. � 'e� ."� .. #�.,... � � ,�� .. � � ' � T� 7n•._.: � . �{ � �,�� «�... � � "... hk . � . � p� �. � { � �' ,.,� , , � 4�� i , ? � . � b� �, �� • � °��, � � • �. � " ,. ,f�=��. * ,, � � a �,, '!P Y�i' � f '�!� ts;.� �� " �'�� ii `` 'f" �F �+�� .��P " .. ' �� r 'wy��. � ��'�i�'`� .r,,;I� ��, . . . ' � I i �;rs:��(r�» �� •,�`. r m : � � ��Y�� i � *�F ,�.,�,�� , . � . ��` �+�.. r -�f � �� , 31�4�"�, `��y �•1 . * �^��,�" �r�,i�'�"�r-•y'� �� t`' "s ` �� ,�`��`,� ,��,a�"r w �s.` �_ �� : .. � , �� }#e '"� ,� ��.�- .,,��''. , , , : � i ,,�, � ` .°� �,,,�, � t �. s ,R . ?`�,' n;a, • � � + �'-� � .�: � � � � �� ' }�`` J [� �` °�� `�� a. � �• � . ;��F ;y', .: � § :. .. .ai+�� _ a`.�� . .. - ,� ' `�� ' , "FL��. " 4. .:�� . . F ,', �• Sf P. • � n4'+-`'.Pi 3i�. �`�'��.,'`ti ..•N�' �� ..� ;rt:, �� `',} 1�4 �a .— �'.' �i * � `,:�,�ti,�,�1 r '"'w�, - '��,.tiy_� �� k,: «�� . �.; �+�' �`° �:�z » � ,� '�", ' �t , t w�_,' '. , _ :,` e.:.� ..-�. . � �� r� � � �� y � � � �� r �� * '°� . �.� . ' �'' � � .rt`r'" . . °' ,�.,i' � �+ �.� A� � ��. • , , �� . � 5 , r e _ : , � ��. . ��. ..., �, _ ,, , a�, � � _ , � , . �C.� �x j ... . ..� � ._ � �N�$� p �f! t, �� , � �s .m ,•�k,.; . a�4.. r; ,�` . :.,,:, �.;, � r ., €� . . .. � M1�- �. .« � - . `�...�i� �.. � . 4 f #�� `� t � �. dr "� ,y. ..�+.�. ` � J�� '�� }J� ' i s/" + �y �^p�.. � �i a� ��'�. �� &.,' � ! r �" "i�' �` ``: � � � °s�� ": �,,' �;r= "� " _ _ � " � . � ��, � � ,,� v�vk�� . .. �� ..,� e . �+ � '� � _�-, . } '�„ . . , � � � . 3 S � �` a',w°� . . . . �+��' � �� „. � ....' � . . ��* E ,y.��*4 '� $��-� . �` � "�` �� F� ��..:�.>_' .�� e �.. �.4 �$� . � t �� . � Y C � ��. � ., , .� :S ! �� " . 3 #a.+P w 3. }I� s ' Date Application Received: 6/24/13 Date Application Considered as Complete: 8/7/13 Initial 60-Day Review Period Expiration: l0/6/l3 Review Period Extended on 9/11/13 to: 12/5/13 Review Period Extended on 11/2l/13 to: 2/1/14 REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Date: November 21, 2013 Item No.: Department Approval: Administrator ApprovaL• Agenda Section: Name: Michael P. Gaffron Planning Dept. Title: Asst. City Admin. -Long Term Strategy Item Description: 13-3615, James Anderst on behalf of Narrows LLC, dba Orono Liquors - 3384-86 Shoreline Drive, Conditional Use Permit for Restaurant Use Zoning District: B-1, Retail Sales Business District(20,000 s.f. minimum) Lot Area: 0.31 acres (13,656 s.£) Lot Width: 112 feet (100' required) App[ication Summary: Applicant requests a variety of approvals in order to establish and operate a new restaurant adjacent to the existing Narrows Saloon in the westerly half of the existing building. The new use is proposed as being a separate restaurant use with separate kitchen and dining facilities and will not have direct connections to the Saloon, but will share an entryway and restroom facilities with the Saloon. The following approvals are required: 1) CUP for establishing and operating a Class II restaurant with liquor. 2) Approval to allow outdoor seating at the rear of the new restaurant, adjacent to the City owned parking lot but within the applicant's property. 3) Applicant also proposes include an outdoor seating area at the rear of the Saloon operation. 4) The application is subject to the Site Plan Review process established via Ordinance No. 68 3`d Series in February 2010. Plartning Commission Recommendation: Planning Commission at its October 21 meeting on a vote of 7-0 recommended approval of the requested CUP and site plan approval, subject to adherence to all pertinent City codes and submission of a landscape/planting plan for Council review. Staff Recommendation: Approval subject to conditions. � ' #13-3615 November 21,2013 Page 2 List of Exhibits A -Notice of Planning Commission Action 10/25/13 B - Landscape/Planting Plan submitted 11/15/13 C - Planning Commission Draft Minutes of 10/21/13 D -Public Comments - Lindgren Letter 10/20/13 E - Planning Commission Memo and Exhibits dated 10/17/13 Please carefully review the Planning Commission Memo and Exhibits of 10/17/13 and the October 21 PC minutes. Pursuant to the Planning Commission's direction of October 21, the applicant has provided a minimal landscape plan for the proposed seating areas indicating the use of arborvitae plantings along the proposed northerly fence line of the two proposed seating areas. Planning Commission reviewed the application initially on August 19 and requested a variety of additional detail, all of which is contained within the PC memo and exhibits. On October 21 Planning Commission reviewed the additional submittals and discussed the various aspects of the application. A summary of the topics discussed and the conclusions reached appears below: A. Commercial Site Plan Review Findin�s. Section 78-145 establishes a number of evaluation criteria that must be satisfied in order to approve a site plan review. (1) ls the use compatible with surrounding land uses; (Staff recommendation: The use is compatible with the surrounding commercial district) (2) Does the use preserve existing unique and natural features of the site and minimize impacts to wetlands, floodplains, and shoreland areas; (Staff recommendation: The site contains no unique natural features which would be impactec� There is no increase in hardcover proposed) (3) Does the use create a harmonious relationship of buildings and open space with natural site features and with existing and future buildings having a visual relationship of the development; (StafJ recorrimendation: The proposed aesthetic improvements including fa�ade upgratles and landscaped outdoor seating would complerraent the area and improve the visual character of the immediate commercial neighborhood) (4) Does the use achieve a safe and efficient vehicular and pedestrian circulation system; (Staff recommendation: Impacts of the proposal on vehicular and pedestrian circulation would be potentially magnified if parking demand exceeds supply due to success oJ the proposed use) Planning Commission noted that offset in peak parking demand between this and other users of the Ciry parking lot would minimize this issue. (5) Places no excessive demands on services and infrastructure, including local streets; (Staff recommendation: Potential new demands on services and infrastructure might include added demands on sewer system as well as added demands on parking availability) (6) Conforms to the city's plans for parks, streets, and walkways; (Staff recommendation: The proposal would generally be in conformance with City plans for parks, streets and walkways) , ' #13-36]5 November 21,2013 Page 3 (7) Conforms to the Orono Community Management Plan; (StaJf recomrrtendation: The proposed restaurant use is located in one of the few areas of Orono where a Class II restaurant would be allowed under the CMP) (8) Achieves a maximum of safety and convenience of vehicular and pedestrian movement; (Staff recommendation: The proposed use has a potential if wildly suecessful to place some strains on parking convenience) Planning Commission expressed a concern that the easterly outdoor seating area would displace the only designated handicap parking area to the City lot. (9) Incorporates sufficient landscaping to reasonably screen undesirable features and to enhance the image of the development; (Staff recommendation: Planning Commission should review the proposed exterior design and landscape plans for the patio area including dumpster location) Planning Commission reviewed the proposed elevation views of the outdoor seating area screening and found it to be an improvement over the existing situation, but asked that a more definite landscape plan be provided prior to Council review. See applicant's submittal, Exhibit B. (10) Protects abutting properties and does not create detrimental disturbances to surrounding properties; (Staff recommendation: Planning Commission should give consideration as to how or whether the proposed use might impact adjoining comrreercial uses as well as nearby residential uses) Planning Commission considered the potential impacts of added parking needs and parking congestion; exterior lighting; noise and activity associated with outdoor seating; and concluded that these issues have been or can be suitably addressed by proper design and management of the operation. (1 1) Conforms to all requirements of this chapter unless a variance has been granted. (Staff recommendation:potentia[variance needs are cal[ed out within the staff review) The rear and side setback associated with the dumpster and the outdoor fireplace were not found to be significant issues. (12) Incorporates efforts to conserve energy whenever practical. (Staff recommendation: This should be reviewed with applicant, but no specific code sections are applicable) B. Site Plan. Signage. Signage proposed for both the saloon and the restaurant incorporates dormer- style extensions added to the canopy at thr front of the building. See Exhibits D and F of 10/17/13 PC memo. Lettering in the front would be backlighted with LED lights. At the rear, smaller but similarly styled signage is proposed for each use. The proposed signage plan appears to be well within the square footage limits for the site. Exterior li h�ting. Proposed exterior lighting for the building is depicted in Exhibits D, F and I of 10/17/13 PC memo. The fixtures appear to be a conical hood above a lighted globe. To the extent the source of light (the filament) is shielded from off-site view, these fixtures would be appropriate for the proposed use and locations. It would be the City's intent to ensure that the lighting has no negative impacts on the residential neighborhood to the north. 1 �� #13-3615 November 21,2013 Page 4 Outdoor Dinin� Areas. The applicant has proposed outdoor seating areas in the rear of both the saloon and restaurant adjacent to the City-owned parking lot. While the City Code doesn't specifically address outdoor seating as a conditional use, both proposed outdoor seating areas can be considered as an expansion of the defined restaurant uses as they will both offer additional seating for food service. However, the outdoor seating will be seasonal in nature and weather dependent; it potentially has different impacts than the interior seating. The size of the seating area based on the revised survey is about 600 s.f. for the restaurant, which would likely have the capacity for 30-36 patrons, and about 550 s.f. for the saloon, which would have a capacity of perhaps 24-30 patrons. The outdoor dining areas would each incorporate a 4'-5' fence and arbor vitae screening to provide separation from the dumpster and parking area and to control patron movement. Applicant's stated intent is to only allow access to the seating areas from within the establishment they adjoin. Exhibits F & I of the 10/17 memo and the recently submitted landscape plan showing arbor vitae plantings depict two distinctly different aesthetic visualizations of the border of the outdoor seating areas. Council should ask applicant to define which concept he actually expects to create. Planning Commission did not have an issue regarding the dumpster enclosure location. Staff would suggest it needs to be separated from the west lot line at least a few feet to allow adequate access for accumulated trash removal. The general orientation of the dumpster appears to be logical to allow a garbage truck to back toward it from the north. C. Interior Layout and Function. The new restaurant will be in the same building that houses the Narrows Saloon. Please review Exhibits I and J of the 10/17 PC memo, which depict the proposed floor plan layout. The new restaurant use will not be directly accessible from the Saloon but will share the rear entry and restroom facilities. The westerly two spaces in which the new use is proposed are approximately 40' x 50' in total, or 2,000 s.f. of floor area (4,000 s.f. including the basement level). This new proposed restaurant includes a dining area with bar and kitchen on the main floor, with a second bar and additional seating in the basement. These spaces will be separated from the portions of building occupied by the Narrows Saloon by an eacisting wall. An additional hallway will be created on the main floor to allow access from both businesses to the restrooms. The total interior space devoted to the restaurant use (public floor area) as roughly calculated by staff will be approximately 1,500 s.f. on the main floor and 1,250 s.f. on the basement level, for a total of 2,750 s.f. Storage and non-public spaces (kitchen, bar, prep areas, etc.) will total approximately 1,250 s.£ The exterior public space in the restaurant seating area depicted on the survey is approximately 600 s.f., with the patio area adjacent to the saloon being approximately 550 s.f. The applicant's interior plan depicts a conceptual seating layout far the new restaurant with approximately 80 patrons capacity on the main floor including the exterior seating, and 36 patrons on the lower floor. #13-3615 November 21,2013 Page 5 The applicant's architect has calculated that the shared restroom facilities would meet building code requirements for the occupant load of the building. This has been confirmed by Building Official Lyle Oman. One comment received from the public indicated that restroom use at the Narrows can be difficult between sets. Lyle notes that the codes do not intend to account for such peak demands. Applicant has noted that ADA accessibility codes will require the installation of an elevator for use of the basement area. PC memo Exhibit I depicts three possible locations applicant is considering for elevator installation. D. Restaurant Operation. Applicant has indicated that the restaurant is planned to be open daily from 3:00 pm to 11:00 pm, but is requesting the ability for 8:00 am to 1:00 am in the event that breakfast/lunch is added on the weekends. Planning Commission discussed whether limiting hours of the outdoor restaurant seating would be appropriate, but did not make a specific recommendation. Applicant noted that currently food service stops at 10 pm on weekdays and 11 pm on weekends. The applicant noted that he has no intent to pipe live music from the Saloon operation to the outside seating areas, although he would potentially like to have speakers for soft dinner background music. It is worth noting that the double door system at the rear of the building should, if managed properly, avoid excessive Saloon music exiting the building. E. Potential Impacts on Surrounding Area. Planning Commission had asked that staff confer with the Police Department for an overview of any past noise and parking issues related to the current use of the site. Exhibit N of the 10/17 PC memo indicates no complaints have been received since 2006 specifically regarding noise or parking. The applicant notes that both outdoor seating areas are intended to have food service (and presumably alcoholic beverage service). The outdoor seating areas will need aggressive management to ensure they don't become problematic. F. Liquor Licensing. The applicant will be required obtain a separate liquar license for the Steak House restaurant use. Expansion of the Saloon to include outdoar food service seating may require a review of the existing Saloon liquor license. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the proposed restaurant use, noting that public input received formally and informally to date has been supportive. Appropriate conditions need to be placed on the additional use to ensure there are no negative impacts on the surrounding neighborhood and adjacent businesses. The two most significant apparent concerns that need to be managed are parking availability and potential noise/light/activity impacts to the neighborhood to the north across the parking lot. Council should address these concerns with the applicant and if Council determines they can be reasonably managed, then approval with conditions would be appropriate. a � #13-3615 November 21,2013 Page 6 COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED Motion to direct staff to draft an approval resolution for consideration at the December 9 meeting, incorporating appropriate conditions and restrictions. �r� TIME � CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN � INSPECTION O IC SCHEDULED � PERMIT NO. � �COMPLEfED ADDRESS ' OWNER TELEPHONE NO� a'�� `'+�s�� CONTRACTOw �h�►�S L�C- � DESCRIPTION ��OOTING ❑ PLUMBING AL ❑ EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING Q 0 POURED WALL ❑ MECHANICAL RI ❑ LAKESHORFJWETLANDS y ❑ FRAMING ❑ MECHANICAL FINAL ❑ TREE REMOVAL Z ❑ INSULATION ❑ WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE ❑ SITE INSPECTION Q ❑ RADON SLAB ❑ WATEH HOOK-UP ❑ PROGRESS � ❑ FINAL ❑ SEWER HOOK-UP ❑ COMPLAINT � ❑ DEMO-SITE ❑ SEPTIC MAINT. ❑ FOLLOW-UP _ ❑ DEMO-FINAL ❑ SEPTIC INSTALL ❑ HARD COVER REMOVAL � ❑ PLUMBING RI ❑ SEPTIC FINAL ❑ FOUNDATION/REMOVAL Z OWNERICONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU:_YES_NO y COMMENTS: ��r - � � �fKl�►�[ �� Gµ�'7/ �N � L� e O - Foat�..�s,_�er ��4w- a -1�f� 'y �i�,z�r�`� �.. ` � ` �Yl�� C I�r��t.�et r ✓'e�s/ � O � W � .Sd�� - d�C Q � z W � W � J � ATISFACTORY:PROCEED ❑ PROJECT COMPLEfE W RRECT WORK 8 PROCEED ❑ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY O ❑CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REtNSPECTION TEMPORARY V BEFORECOVERING PERMANENT ❑CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS_ ❑ PHOTO TAKEN INSPECTOR WILL RETURN ❑CITATION ISSUED ❑STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR ❑INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. t inspection 24 aours in advance. (952) 249-4600 pwne ctor on site: Inspector: ` White Copyllnspector's File Cenary CopylSite Not�e ` , �,.. - , . r , � . _ � __ � _ , p�p COP , � . - �� ,, �i��_ __. __,..._ __._: e.._ . , '' O �r.,�- ,�_._ \ �„ _ ___ ,� w �,. - _ ._ - - __ � ", � . _ -�" r N mi� � � � - � a �: .. ' '�_1 � S O � — � <L <0 Q ` � � _ � � � � ng � `� � U '.' � 3 c�0 � 3�i :L�1� _._ '.' � � v � � - (��T S � � �y `� S � (� $L � ` � , . . `'� S '— �. �N .. ... . �w � � � C 2 [+ 1 . . / x � � N � � � � � � � � � 2 � � � � O � � 0 z � a y � � � � � � � � �_ � � � � � N � N .0 � � �� m l�� e,�� - io-, 1C I �o � , �, �� ,... y�3�� - O I N� � � � 1 New na�r �Q.r m � � 3'-Q"x7',O" 3�_��X�� _ � �_� rniv� ,�.�, § d C-C� -� � - �prt � � � �i`n �O � z �:,: � .�N z t� � � . � N� �_ �� - � :,; a -� a � ,� � � �; - � � v � N� o � � - � � � � � . �� o m � rn � - � � � �� W � � O � - C � � o �J � � = m q ie= O �:;. �v � ce � - E � O' � �_ V� _ = co — � 3 � m� 4 � � _ _ _ _ S Sli � � R� _ _ � � X � � _ �'F ' � v � � � O ` __ O � `� N - � . �J�"l�ii �" _ � ��V��'�E� ��r �� `��a��,�� PIAN CHECKED BY� ATE Ic�� — � ' � O O � o o :: -� _ ., � ,--� o :�:: _ : ,_�_. _._ _ � 1 ` , � � / � . � . � prefinished Met,al �� ORO�fO COPY Cap ine Of Cou►�er �lashinq 60 mil Membrane f�oofinq � Corrtinous Over Cornice 1�apered �idqid Insulation - 51 ope �0 5cupper � � � r------ ------ � _�_ --------------- �— i ----------------------- ------------ —� � 5�xucture � � � � O O � O p '� O O ^ - � ,v I I � O s 2 x 12 - 12" o,c, ; S ' Core-�ill Masonr�{ Wall {3el ow 5�,eel � � , � �/ �" CnX pluwc�d poof 5h�athinq � �earinq �oirr� � N I � � � � , � , � � � � � �, � — — � C i i � � � i i � i ' v � � � Maintain �hermal Isolation [3c.�ween Canc.rc� � � � —� ! 51ab �1nd 5ubs�r-a�e � � � �x�r��- n�-5ill A�H ; `�� on�rc�te 51ab Over 6 m il V apor (3arrier � Com ' patible I � � f3ituminous pavinq - 2" Min, ' � � � � � , � , � � � � , � � � - a i a , 4 ., ��;r:fr.:.;�r*u��iw;�,�:�:;::;4"�r':^�`'•z n:":�K? f� <,. . ;`M`, e . a. I d b . f^4^• .l. .pJy�YYiaJ:t��'��.�:�`q�µ�1�Sk^iY"%eyyA�',y�fri��Yt�y,'•r�,e�„r;;i}r1�r��+�,�.-'�• 1 . III��III�I�I-III-III�IIIalll�� L� '�h'{i.y:� l��.Lf�.lf{,' � I11-111�111-111�111-111-111�11i e� =111=111-111-111-111�111=111-1U=111-111=111-111-111-lII- � 2" �?idqid �oam Insulation -� 8" C�M,(�� ', �o� ,�.� ,�a' 12' x 20" Concrc�te �ootinq w/ , � . .�, � 2 #� f�e inforcemerr� f?ods ( COYt�IYIGU�,'' , C�0'N�i �nnl�.in;� l�v��t � DATE TIME CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN INSPECTION NO E P�/� SCHEDULED PERMIT NO. � l y�' ' `� COMPLETED �T•�� '7 ADDRESS � :� � �� _� 1�''��l � - ��%"t �� ? OWNER TELEPHONE NO. CONTRACTOR � � DESCRIPTION �� `�C� ly ❑ FOOTING ❑ DEMO-FINAL ❑ SEPTIC FINAL Q ❑ POURED WALL ❑ PLUMBING RI ❑ EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING O ❑ FOUNDATION WATERPROOF ❑ PLUMBING FINAL ❑ TREE REMOVAL Z ❑ RADON SLAB ❑ MECHANICAL RI ❑ SITE INSPECTION Q FRAMING ❑ MECHANICAL FINAL ❑ RATED WALLS _ ❑ I SULATION ❑ WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE ❑ COMPLAINT � ❑ FINAL ❑ WATER HOOK-UP ❑ FOLLOW-UP 41 ❑ AS BUILT-SURVEY ❑ SEWER HOOK-UP ❑ FOUNDATION/REMOVAL _ J ❑ DEMO-SITE ❑ SEPTIC INSTALL 2 dWNERlCOKTRACTOR TO MEET YOU: YES_NO y COMMENTS: - L'�� 4 �`i�lr�'' �i{i d�- �e�� `�d ��ef �rcx�< <,� . o �v"� �,'�t CIC., /�� u'' Lr^p d�, '' �- �� , (� , � o ,� ',,�, � W � -� � � `"' � W 0C � W K SATISFACTORY`.PROCEED ❑PROJECT COMPLETE � ❑CORRECT WORK 3 PROCEED ❑ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY 0 ❑CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY V BEFORE CONERINO PERMANENT ❑CORRECTUNSAFECONOITIONWITHIN HOURS. O PHOTOTAKEN INSPECTOR WIILL RETURN ❑STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR O CITATION ISSUED ❑INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. Call forthe next inspection 24 hours in edvance. (952) 249-4600 OwnedContra on site: Inspector: wn��e covrnn�scwrs Fiw Cenary CoDrlSit�Notlee DATE TIME CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN INSPECTION NOTICE SCHEDULED PERMIT NO.��,��,-�L�� connP�FrEo " � / � ADDRESS �� ' �� L .7/�^�v'� OWNER ,�� TELEPHONE NO. CONTRACTOR � � DESCRIPTION ty ❑ FOOTING ❑ DEMO-FINAL ❑ SEPTIC FINAL Q ❑ POURED WALL ❑ PLUMBING RI ❑ EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING Q ❑ FOUNDATION WATERPROOF ❑ PLUMBING FINAL ❑ TREE REMOVAL Z ❑ ADON SLAB ❑ MECHANICAL RI ❑ SITE INSPECTION Q FRAMING ❑ MECHANICAL FINAL ❑ RATED WALLS ❑ INSULATION ❑ WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE ❑ COMPLAINT Q ❑ FINAL ❑ WATER HOOK-UP ❑ FOLLOW-UP 41 ❑ AS BUILT-SURVEY ❑ SEWER HOOK-UP ❑ FOUNDATION/REMOVAL _ J ❑ DEMO-SITE ❑ SEPTIC INSTALL 2 OWNERlCONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU:_YES_NO � COMMENTS: � a o � � � � �� ' r �v' � � �- ✓� , ' � -�' � � �'_d ��-ic�� 0 � W 2 Q � 2 W � W � � d W� ❑WORKSATISFACTORY:PROCEED ❑ PROJECT COMPLEfE W ❑CORRECT WORK 8 PROCEED ❑ ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY � ❑CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY � BEFORE CWERING PERMANENT ❑CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. ❑ pHOTO TAKEN INSPECTOR WILL REfURN ❑CITATION ISSUED ❑STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR ❑INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. Ca11 for the next inspection 24 hours in advance. (952� 249-4600 OwnerlCon r on site: . Inspect . �� White Copyllnspector's File Canary CopylSite Notice