The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2015-00856 - addn/remodel/repair , ` � CITY OF ORONO 2750 KELLEY PARKWAY * Z 0 1 5 - P1 0 8 5 6 * � DATE ISSUED: 09/29/2015 ORONO, MN 55356- (952) 249-4600 FAX: (952) 249-4616 ADDRESS : 3423 SHORELINE DR PIN : 20-117-23-12-0034 LEGAL DESC : REG. LAND SURVEY NO. 1422 �` "� : LOT 000 BLOCK 000 ��'� PERMIT TYPE : ADDITION/REMODEL/REPAIR PROPERTY TYPE : COMMERCIAL-BUSINESS CONSTRUCTION TYPE : ADDN/REMODEL/REPAIR ACTIVITY : 437-NONRESIDENTIAL&NONHOUSEKEEPIN VALUATION : $ 10,000.00 NOTE: [NTERIOR REMODEL&REPLACING DOOR RAMP HANDRAILS AT 3435 SHOREL[NE DR NOTE:NEED LETTER FROM MET COUNCIL FOR NEW USE,BEFORE PERMIT WILL BE ISSUED. (LETTER ATTACHED,DATED 08/25/15) NO SAC UNITS DUE AT THIS T[ME. APPLICAI�IT PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE 20136 CHARLES CORDER PLAN REVIEW 130.88 6023 CHERRYWOOD STATE SURCHARGE(VALUATION) 5.00 MOLIND, MN 55364- TOTAL 337.24 (612)581-7408 Payment(s) CREDIT CARD 9515 337.24 OWNER Brook [nvestment Group LLC 34321 MYRTLE LA UNION CITY,CA 94587- AGREEMENT AND SWORN STATEMENT The work for which this permit is issued shall be performed according to the approved plans and specifications,applicable City approvals,and the State Building Code. This permit is for only the work described and does not grant permission for additional or related work which requires separate permits. All provisions of laws and ordinances governing this type of work shall be compied with whether or not specified herein.This permit will expire and become null and void if construction authorized is not commenced within 180 days of the date of issuance,or if construction is suspended for a period of 180 days at any time after work has commenced. The applicant is responsible for assuring all required inspections are requested in conformance with the State Building Code.This permit may be revoked at any time for due cause. � ... ri`�� c�� I ��i s� `_� ,� � ;!`� Applicant Permitee Signature Date Issued By Signature Date , � City of Orono �Building Permit Application for Maintenance / Replacement / Remodel (i.e. windows, doors, siding, re-roof, etc. — NO STRUCTURAL EXPANSION) �T Mailing Address: 5 _�� l VO PO Box 66 Permit number: ZO r Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Date received: � �o � Street Address: Received by: �- � `/ J �l G� 2750 Kelley Parkway Plan review fee: fu� -f-a.[�.c... .. Orono, MN 55356 9'�ESH�� LLcV(.�'�Cu( dt.� ..:r. : . Total Fee: ��-� �� Main: 952-249-4600 Fax: 952-249-4616 www.ci.orono.mn.us This application form must be completed in full and all required information must be submitted. �',�. 1��'��`�`�t��'Z�'�'��' Incomplete application will be returned. (Please print)- GENERALINFORMATION�4a3 � Job Site Address: � � �� -��//h�-� ��"� u -�._ Will this be a Parade of Homes, Remodelers Showcase Home or other Display Home? ❑ Yes + i�r If yes,a special event permit is required with Police Department and City Council approval 60 days prior to the event. Shutt/e bus s �ic will be required unless applicant demonstrates sufficient on-site parking is available. Non-permitted events will not be allowed. CONTRACTOR/APP �ANT INFORM N: Name: � �,, �.� � �� -�� State License# Expiration Date: Lead Certification Number: Expiration Date: (for work on homes that wef e constructgd prior to 1978 Phone: (cell) (� �Z - � �'/ —�Ll� (office) Mailing Address: . U � .� „, �,�,�,� , City: V v��-. ZIP: S Contact Person: � Applicant is: Contractor / Homeowner (Circle One) Email and/or Fax: `,� . J �� 1 , ,� �4 , '� s �v ,�� PROPERTY OWNER INFOR�ARA�TIqN� r�� /"'� Name: %{ (, (. �/ Phone(day): /Z _ '7�C� — -Z Address: City: ZIP: Email and/or Fax: PROJECT INFORMATION: Overall ro�ect descri tion: `l�.�-c%�-%"�b1 G'��'t,�'�"� � ' � � P 1 p a�. ..�d�. L�J Cti.l�S � I4��v��t T• of Project: Any earth movement may also require � � ❑ Door(s) Remodel ❑ Fire Damage MCWD review&permits: ❑ Re-roof,asphalt (�Repair ❑ Storm Damage Minnehaha Creek Watershed District(MCWD) / ❑ Re-roof,cedar 15320 Minnetonka Blvd r� ❑ Restoration ❑Water Damage Minnetonka, MN 55345 �� ❑ Re-roof, other(specify) ❑ Siding ❑ Other: (specify) Phone: 952-471-0590 Fax: 952-471-0682 ❑Window(s) www.minnehahacreek.orq Estimated Construction Valuation of Project(excluding land) $ s� APPLICANT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: • Agrees to provide all information required or requested by the Building Department; • Certifies that the information supplied is true and correct to the best of his/her knowledge. The applicant recognizes that they are solely responsible for submitting a complete application being aware that upon failure to do so, the staff has no alternative but to reject it until it is complete; • Some or all of the information that you are asked to provide on this app►ication is classified by State law as either private or confidential. Private data is information which generally cannot be given to the public but can be given to the subject of the data. Confidential data is information which�e.�,ner ly cannot be given to either the public or the subject of the data. Our purpose and intended use of this info a' n is o�nn Ily update our records and records of other governmental agencies required by law. If ou refuse to su I i ormatio ,th a lication ma not be issued. ApplicanYs Signature: Date: � �v � � Owner's Signature: Date: Last Updated:January 2015 � P�AN REVIEW CHECKLIST FOR NEW STRUCTURES / ADDITIONS Address: J �� Permit No.: Description of work: _1 _!�/cC�'L� Q� (91`' US'e-� �C�C��GJ Date Rec'd: Septic review by: 1/V��C'�/' Q�� Date Approved: Zoning review by: � Date Approved: Building review by: Date Approved: � l Grading review by: /X �1q- Date Approved: Zoning District: Zoning File#: Reso#: Reso Date: Zoning: Lot Area: SF/AC Width: Lot Coverage: SF % Survey Submitted: � Yes 0 No Date of Survey: Revised date ? : Proposed Setbacks: Front(Lake) Rear(Street) ( N S E W ) ( N S E W Other Buildings Wetland Side Side Defined Height: Peak Hei ht: FFE: E minus 6 feet= (Existing Contour) Perimeter(linear feet)= 50° = L.F. below grade #of Stories FOR A BUILDING WITH A BASEMENT OR CRAWL SPA E: FOR BUILDING ON A SLAB FOUNDATION: The distance between the owest proposed The distance between the top of START WITH floor(of the basement or c wl space)and START WITH slab and the highest point of the the highest point of the roof. roof. If you have a... If you have a... . GABLE OR HIPPED ROOF • GABLE OR HIPPED RO F(no (no windows): Subtract half windows): Subtract half t e distance the distance between the beriveen the highest point f the roof highest point of the roof to to the low point of the corre ponding the low point of the SUBTRACTION gable or hipped roof corresponding gable or (BASED ON . GABLE OR HIPPED ROOF 'th SUBTRACTION hipped roof ROOF TYPE) windows): Subtract half the d nce (BASED ON . GABLE OR HIPPED ROOF between the top of the highest ROOF TYPE) (with windows): Subtract window and the highest point the half the distance between roof the top of the highest • ALL OTHER ROOF TYPE (flat, window and the highest mansard,etc):No subtra ion. point of the roof • ALL OTHER ROOF TYPES SUBTRACTION SubVact the distance betwee the (flat,mansard,etc):No (BASED ON basemenUcrewl space floor nd the subtraction. EXISTING highest existing grade adj ent to the ADDITION Add the distance between the top GRADES) foundation OR 10 feet(w ichever is less (BASED ON of slab and the highest existing EQUALS Defined building heig EXISTING grade adjacent to the foundation. GRADES EQUALS Deflned bullding helght Shoreland District M WD Permit Average Lakeshore Setback Bluff Met? � Yes p Na Permit Nu ber: � Yes � No � N/A 0 Yes � No 0 N/A see attached Setback: Stormwater Quality Existing Har cover Proposed Overlay District (%an sfl Hardcover Variance Required CUP Required Tier circle one %and s � Yes 0 No � Yes � No 1 2 3 4 5 Type(s): Type(s): Updated: January 2015 z:\forms\plan review checklist 2015.docx REMARKS (in-house): Fees to be Char ed YES NO Permit Plan Review State Surcharge Investigation Fee SAC—Number of SAC Units �,/' Other(specify) S uare Foota e $ er S uare Foota e Basement X = $ 15�Floor X = $ 2nd Floo� X = $ Garage X = $ Estimated Construction Value: $ �� Orono Inspections Required Work Requiring Separate Permits Required State Permits � Site lumbing 0 Grading/Filling � Well � Silt Fence/ Erosion Control Mechanical 0 Fire Electrical � Hardcover Removal 0 Septic � Water Connection 0 Footing 0 Fireplace 0 Sewer Connection O Poured Wall 0 Masonry 0 Lawn Irrigation 0 Foundation Survey 0 Mfg. � Landscaping � Foundation Waterproofing 0 Other(specify) � Radon Rock Bed �Framing 0 Insulation 0 As-Built Survey Final � Other(specify) REMARKS (in-house): Other Review: Reviewed by: Date Approved: Access: Existing: � YES 0 NO New: � YES � NO OFFICIAL REMARKS-TO BE NOTED ON PERMIT AND INITIALLED �� . � Updated: January 2015 z:\forms\plan review checklist 2015.docx Roger Peitso August 25, 2015 Building Official City of Orono PO Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066 Dear Mr. Peitso: The Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) Division has determined the SAC to be charged for the wastewater capacity demand for 3435 Shoreline to be located at 3435 Shoreline within the City. The City will be charged no additional SAC Units for this project, as determined below. SAC Units Charges: Office 734 sq. ft. @ 2400 sq. ft. / SAC 0.31 Warehouse 2224 sq. ft. @ 7000 sq. ft. /SAC 0.32 Retail 4519 sq. ft. @ 3000 sq. ft. /SAC 1.51 Fixture Units 2.00 f.u. @ 17 f.u. / SAC 0.12 Total Charges: 2.26 Credits: Retail (Grandparent 1952) 8142 sq. ft. x 80°/o usable space @ 3000 sq. ft. /SAC 2.17 Net Charge: 0.09 or 0 The business information was provided to MCES by the applicant at this time. It is the City's responsibility to substantiate the business use and size at the time of the final inspection. If there is a change in use or size, a redetermination will need to be made. If you have any questions email corv.mccullouqh(a�metc.state.mn,us. Sincerely, � �� Cory McCullough SAC Program Technical Specialist CM: Is: 150825A1 (700454, 387263) Determination expiration: 08/25/2017 cc: Rachel Dodge, City of Orono Robin Wade, Yet to Be Determined File, MCES � -..- . - � .� � • . . .� �� . �.� � . • �•� - . . METROPOLIT'AN C O U N C I L Roger Peitso From: Roger Peitso Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 8:00 AM To: 567wade@gmail.com Cc: 345paul@gmail.com Subject: Plan Review 435 Shoreline Drive Attachments: Building_Permit_Application_for Maintenance-Renovation_2015.pdf; Review Letter_ 7-10-15.pdf Robin, Attached is a copy of the review letter I sent to Daniel. We have no application for a building permit application for this project. I have attached the one you need to fill out and a copy of the review letter. Thanks, Roger Peitso Building Official City of Orono Direct: 952-249-6425 Email: rpeitso@ci.orono.mn.us Fax: 952-249-4616 ��r� I ��_f�.�i 1 . Roger Peitso From: Robin Wade <567wade@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 10:45 AM To: Roger Peitso Subject: Re: Plan Review 435 Shoreline Drive Roger????The review letter you sent is to some other property to Bank of Mellon in Texas????? Contractor is coming today to get permit-you were going to get back to me about the demo On Jul 10,2015,at 8:00 AM, Roger Peitso<rpeitso@ci.orono.mn.us>wrote: Robin, Attached is a copy of the review letter I sent to Daniel.We have no application for a building permit application for this project. I have attached the one you need to fill out and a copy of the review letter. Thanks, Roger Peitso Building Official City of Orono Direct:952-249-6425 Email: r�eitso@ci.orono.mn.us Fax:952-249-4616 <image001.jpg> <Building_Permit_Application_for Maintenance-Renovation 2015.pd� <Review Letter 7-10-15.pdfl i Roger Peitso From: Roger Peitso Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 11:46 AM To: Roger Peitso; 567wade@gmail.com Cc: 345paul@gmail.com Subject: RE: Plan Review 435 Shoreline Drive This should have both the permit application that you contractor filled out and the review letter dated 7-10-15 From: Roger Peitso Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 8:00 AM To: 'S67wade@gmail.com' Cc: '345paul@gmail.com' Subject: Plan Review 435 Shoreline Drive Robin, Attached is a copy of the review letter I sent to Daniel. We have no application for a building permit application for this project. I have attached the one you need to fill out and a copy of the review letter. Thanks, Roger Peitso Building Official City of Orono Direct: 952-249-6425 Email: rpeitso@ci.orono.mn.us Fax: 952-249-4616 r ,�kLl�Ar{� + � E �__� � . Roger Peitso From: Roger Peitso Sent: Saturday, July 11, 2015 1:38 PM To: 567wade@gmail.com Cc: 345paul@gmail.com Subject: FW: Message from KM C654e Attachments: SKM_C654e15071112340.pdf Robin, I rescanned the review letter. If it didn't work again here is what it said July 10, 2015 RE: 3435 Shoreline Drive Orono, MN 55391 We have completed a preliminary plan review for the above-captioned project and find the following items, but may not limited to,that must be addressed in writing before a permit can be issued: 1. The door for the closet by the Southwest exit needs to have a minimum 12"clearance from the door to the wall on the push side. 2. The single door exit at the Southwest corner of the building needs to have a minimum 12"clearance from the door to the wall on the push side. 3. The door for the employee area exit needs to have a minimum 12"clearance from the door to the wall on the push side. 4. Provide accessible signage detail for both the men's and woman's bathrooms. Signs shall have tactile writing. 5. All plans needs to be signed and have your registration number for the State of Minnesota on each page. 6. Provide permit application signed by the person responsible for the work.No permit can be issued without a permit application. 7. Line H of the code analysis shows 21,500 square feet allowable,this number should be 64,500 square feet. 8. Provide 2 sets of new plans with all corrections. 9. Separate permits will be required for plumbing,mechanical, fire suppression and electrical is through the State. Please call if you have any questions. Roger Peitso Building Official City of Orono Direct: 952-249-6425 Email: rpeitso@ci.orono.mn.us Fax: 952-249-4616 RP: rp i � From: admin Sent: Friday, July 10, 2015 11:35 PM To: Roger Peitso Subject: Message from KM_C654e 2 Roger Peitso From: Robin Wade <567wade@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 1:35 PM To: Roger Peitso Subject: Code requirements and Greb review We want to schedule a meeting later this week. Please give us several options as it will involve several people's schedules. Please forward the public data info you said that you would forward today. On Jul 10, 2015, at 11:47 AM, Roger Peitso <rpeitso@ci.orono.mn.us>wrote: Robin her is the letter Roger Peitso Building Official City of Orono Direct: 952-249-6425 Email: rpeitso@ci.orono.mn.us Fax: 952-249-4616 <image001.jpg> <Review Letter 7-10-15.pdf5 i Roger Peitso From: Roger Peitso Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 3:09 PM To: Robin Wade Subject: RE: Code requirements and Greb review Robin, I have looked through the files for the building you are in and I cannot find any other instances similar to your situation. From what I have seen the O'Riley Auto Parts took over the space the was a NAPA Auto Parts store. Any questions please call, Roger From: Robin Wade [mailto:567wade@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 1:35 PM To: Roger Peitso Subject: Code requirements and Greb review We want to schedule a meeting later this week. Please give us several options as it will involve several people's schedules. Please forward the public data info you said that you would forward today. On Jul 10, 2015, at 11:47 AM, Roger Peitso <rpeitso@ci.orono.mn.us>wrote: Robin her is the letter Roger Peitso Building Official City of Orono Direct: 952-249-6425 Email: rpeitso@ci.orono.mn.us Fax: 952-249-4616 <image001.jpg> <Review Letter_7-10-15.pdfl i Roger Peitso From: Robin Wade <567wade@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 3:16 PM To: Roger Peitso Subject: Re: Code requirements and Greb review What you and I discussed was letters that have been sent from Orono to Oreillys relative to the fire sprinklers. Please forward that to us. When are you available for a meeting? On Jul 13, 2015, at 3:08 PM, Roger Peitso<rpeitso@ci.orono.mn.us>wrote: Robin, I have looked through the files for the building you are in and I cannot find any other instances similar to your situation. From what I have seen the O'Riley Auto Parts took over the space the was a NAPA Auto Parts store. Any questions please call, Roger From: Robin Wade [mailto:567wadeC�gmail.com] Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 1:35 PM To: Roger Peitso Subject: Code requirements and Greb review We want to schedule a meeting later this week. Please give us several options as it wili involve several peopie's schedules. Please forward the public data info you said that you would forward today. On Jul 10, 2015, at 11:47 AM, Roger Peitso <rpeitso@ci.orono.mn.us>wrote: Robin her is the letter Roger Peitso Building Official City of Orono Di rect: 952-249-6425 Email: rpeitso@ci.orono.mn.us Fax: 952-249-4616 <image001.jpg> <Review Letter_7-10-15.pdf� i Roger Peitso From: Roger Peitso Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 3:39 PM To: Robin Wade Subject: RE: Code requirements and Greb review I did not find anything for O'Riley, they are public records if you would like to look. I don't think anything would have happen because there was no change in the use or occupancy type. Auto parts to Auto parts.Again you are more than welcome to look. As far as availability I am pretty wide open except Wednesday afternoon starting at 11:OOam,tomorrow between 10:00 and noon,Thursday is pretty much wide open Anything else please give me a call, Roger From: Robin Wade [mailto:567wade@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 3:16 PM To: Roger Peitso Subject: Re: Code requirements and Greb review What you and I discussed was letters that have been sent from Orono to Oreillys relative to the fire sprinklers. Please forward that to us. When are you available for a meeting? On Jul 13, 2015, at 3:08 PM, Roger Peitso<rpeitso@ci.orono.mn.us>wrote: Robin, I have looked through the files for the building you are in and I cannot find any other instances similar to your situation. From what I have seen the O'Riley Auto Parts took over the space the was a NAPA Auto Parts store. Any questions please call, Roger From: Robin Wade [mailto:567wadeC�qmail.com] Sent: Monday, July 13, 2015 1:35 PM To: Roger Peitso Subject: Code requirements and Greb review We want to schedule a meeting later this week. Please give us several options as it will involve several people's schedules. Please forward the public data info you said that you would forward today. i � On Jul 10, 2015, at 11:47 AM, Roger Peitso <rpeitso@ci.orono.mn.us>wrote: Robin her is the letter Roger Peitso Building Official City of Orono Di rect: 952-249-6425 Email: rpeitso@ci.orono.mn.us Fax: 952-249-4616 <image001.jpg> <Review Letter_7-10-15.pdfl 2 . Roger Peitso From: Metz, Greg (DLI) <Greg.Metz@state.mn.us> Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2015 12:16 PM To: 567Wade@GMail.com Cc: Jeremy Barnhart; Gridley, Karen (DLI); Roger Peitso Subject: RE: Plan Review Attachments: 3435 Shoreline Drive.pdf Ms.Wade, I am writing to confirm our conversation when you called me at 11:10AM today. We discussed different aspects of the Minnesota Building Code [Minnesota Rule 1305] which has adopted the International Building Code(IBC)with amendments. We discussed aspects of the Minnesota Accessibility Code [Minnesota Rule 1341] which has adopted the ANSI A117.1 Standards for Accessibility. We also discussed aspects of the Minnesota Conservation Code for Existing Buildings [Minnesota Rule 1311]which has adopted the International Existing Building Code (IEBC)with amendments. The plans I received (attached) require two restrooms because the total occupant load of the space is 100 persons or greater based upon occupant load densities(from IBC Table 1004.1.1)of 30 square feet per person for retail space and 300 square feet per person for storage space. [IBC 2902.2] We discussed that you were interested in reducing the overall size of your lease space to take advantage of IBC 2902.2, exception 3 which obviates mercantile spaces from providing separate facilities for men and women when the total occupant load is 100 persons or less. The work discussed qualifies as a Level 2 Alteration in accordance with IEBC 504.1. IEBC Section 806 requires compliance with the current Minnesota Accessibility Code. The Minnesota Accessibility Code 1341,Section 1112.8.3 requires that restroom facilities are accessible. If separate facilities are provided for men and women,then separate accessible facilities must be provided for both genders. If it is technically infeasible to provide accessible separate facilities,an additional accessible toilet must be added. If only one toilet facility is provided (which is the desired direction per our conversation), it shall be accessible. The Minnesota Accessibility Code 1341,Section 1112.7 requires an accessible route to and through your tenant space, including to the accessible toilets. IBC Table 1015.1 requires two separate means of egress from spaces with more than 49 occupants. IBC 1007.1,exception 1 exempts existing buildings from providing accessible means of egress. So, even if your occupant load is greater than 49,the second means of egress is not required to be accessible. SAC Determination is calculated by the city. They will often defer to the Met Council for a determination since the Met Council charges them for SAC. Your designer may prepare a SAC determination to present to the city and request acceptance for permitting with the agreement that if the Met Council makes a differing determination,that you would be willing to pay the balance before obtaining your certificate of occupancy. (you would have had to pay it anyway)The city may or may not agree to such an arrangement due to policies, but you can always ask. Below is the email that I sent to Mr. Peitso this morning with my findings. Best of luck to you and your project. 1 Greg Metz � �Construction Code Rep � Architect MN- DLI Construction Codes& Licensing Division 443 Lafayette Rd. N., St. Paul, MN Desk: 651-284-5884 General: 651-284-5005 G reg.Metz@State.M N.US From: Roger Peitso [mailto:rpeitso@ci.orono.mn.us] Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2015 9:27 AM To: Metz, Greg (DLI) Cc: Jeremy Barnhart; Gridley, Karen (DLI) Subject: RE: Plan Review Greg, Thank you for yours and Karen's time and efforts in helping to clarify what the requirements of the building code in this situation. I was also wondering if you have had any more contact with Ms. Wade and informed her of your findings from the research you have conducted. If not would you be OK with me presenting this email to Ms. Wade? Thanks for help sincerely, Roger From: Metz, Greg (DLI) [mailto:Greg.Metz@state.mn.us] Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2015 7:17 AM To: Roger Peitso Cc: Jeremy Barnhart; Gridley, Karen (DLI) Subject: RE: Plan Review Roger, This turned into a long email,so I have a summary at the bottom in bold. I included my findings so you can chase it back if you would like. Thanks for the plans. Karen Gridley has replaced Curt Weihle as the state's new accessibility expert. I understand that Ms. Wade had a conversation with her last night, so 1 am looping her in on the email. Also, Please read the following as one plan reviewer's opinion. Ms. Wade indicated that her code consultant advised her that the code only required her to have one restroom. She referred me to MN 1341, Section 1113.1.2 which pertains to accessibility requirements precipitated by a change in occupancy. Her concern was that the last paragraph was being interpreted such that if it was technically feasible to comply with the code for new construction, then this section would require the accessibility upgrade to meet the requirements for new construction. I have researched the compliance path options and found the following: Initial Char�ing Lan�ua�e: MN 1300.0040 SCOPE,Subpart 2 can be paraphrased to say that all buildings not identified as IRC-1 through IRC-4 shall comply with Chapter 1305. Then there is exception 1 which states "existing buildings undergoing repair, alteration, change of occupancy, addition or being moved;..." Which means that the architect has the option to either comply with MN 1305 or MN 1311. Note that many sections of MN 1311 refer back to MN 1305, but the application back to 1305 is only by reference from within MN 1311 for compliance at this point. z MN 1311, Section 301.1 makes provisions for three unique compliance paths. Adherence to any one of these three compiiance paths satisfies the requirements of the code. 1311.301.1 "Prescriptive Methods" states that repairs,alterations or changes of occupancy complying with Chapter 4 of this (MN 1311) code shall be considered in compliance with the provisions of this code. Plumbing and fixture counts for plumbing are NOT ADDRESSED in Chapter 4, even when related to change of occupancy. Accessibility refers to the 2015 Minnesota Accessibility Code. 1311.301.2 "Work Area Compliance Method" includes Chapters 5 through 13 of 1311. Chapter 10 deals with change in occupancy, but the plumbing fixtures are only addressed when there is an increase or difference in plumbing fixture requirements (Section 1010.1). The proposed project has a decrease in demand. It is gray if the difference (decrease) in fixture count requirements could/should drive an increase in work scope, since a zero change in fixture count requirements would not trigger the change. But, if a change requirement is interpreted, then 1311.1010.1 refers to 4715 which refers back to 1305 in 4715.12.10. Convoluted but true. -similarly,Section 810.1 states that where there is an increase in plumbing fixture demand by more than 20%, then the plumbing fixtures shall be provided in accordance with 1305. Code is silent on reduction of loading. -Section 1012.1.4 states that all buildings undergoing a change of occupancy classification shall comply with Section 1012.8, which refers to the Minnesota Accessibility Code. 1311.301.3 "Performance Compliance Method" refers to 1311, chapter 14. Section 1401.2.4 has the language that code officials want to see..." can't alter the building to be less safe or less sanitary than the current building. If the current level of safety or sanitation is reduced, it may not be reduced to that below Chapters 2-12 and 14-33 of the IBC. Note that we never get here unless the designer opts for the Performance Compliance Method. Bottom Line: Since the occupant load for the mercantile space is greater than 100,separate facilities are still required for men and women. Since separate facilities exist,they need to continue to be provided, or they need to be replaced with new meeting the current requirements. Accessibility Code 1341,section 1112.8.3 requires that if the existing restrooms remain,they must be upgraded to provide wheelchair accessible stalls in both the men's and the women's restrooms. If this is technically infeasible,then a separate accessible unisex toilet may be added. If the new tenant opts to demolish the existing facilities and provide new,separate accessible toilets will be required for both genders. Greg Metz � Construction Code Rep � Architect MN- DLI Construction Codes & Licensing Division From: Roger Peitso [mailto:rpeitsoC�ci.orono.mn.us] Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 12:36 PM To: Metr, Greg (DLI) Cc: Jeremy Barnhart Subject: Plan Review Greg, Here is a copy of the plans I was given. The architect didn't sign them and there was quite a few problems with the clearances at the doors so I have a review letter into him. Also this is technically a basement, there is a story above this that empties onto the street level. Any questions please give me a call. Thanks, Roger Peitso Building Official 3 City of Orono • Direct: 952-249-6425 Email: rpeitso@ci.orono.mn.us Fax: 952-249-4616 �'`��'�fi�r ;��.��/1_ �:� � 4 . Roger Peitso From: Roger Peitso Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 9:56 AM To: 'Robin Wade' Subject: Bathroom Finish Attachments: I BC 1210.pdf Robin, Attached is the code section for the bathroom finish requirements. Thanks, Roger Peitso Building Official City of Orono Phone: 952-249-4600 Di rect: 952-249-4625 Email: rpeitso@ci.orono.mn.us Fax: 952-249-4616 ' �oNO`.. � : ;c .. , ` , �,��1,��0*`.:'. 1 .• �D�O C ITY OF ORONO �, ,� Street Address: Mailing Address: I Telephone(952)249-4600 '��, ti 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O.Box 66 Fax (952)249-4616 l,9 F,�' Orono,MN 55356 Crystal Bay,MN 55323 www.ci.orono.mn.us KESHO� July 10, 2015 Daniel Christensen 1818 Skyline Drive Minneapolis, MN 55411 RE: 3435 Shoreline Drive Orono, MN 55391 We have completed a preliminary plan review for the above-captioned project and find the following items, but may not limited to,that must be addressed 'm writing before a permit can be issued: 1. The door for the closet by the Southwest exit needs to have a minimum 12"clearance from the door to the wall on the push side. 2. The single door exit at the Southwest corner of the building needs to have a minimum 12" clearance from the door to the wall on the push side. 3. The door for the employee area exit needs to have a minimum 12"clearance from the doar to the wall on the push side. 4. Provide accessible signage detail far both the men's and woman's bathrooms. Signs shall have tactile writing. 5. All plans needs to be signed and have your registration number far the State of Minnesota on each page. 6. Provide permit application signed by the person responsible far the work.No permit can be issued without a permit application. 7. Line H of the code analysis shows 21,500 square feet allowable,this number should be 64,500 square feet. 8. Provide 2 sets of new plans with all corrections. 9. Separate permits will be required for plumbing, mechanical, fire suppression and electrical is trough the State. Please call if you have a questions. -, � ll� � �--7 �� J5 , �1�I�' r�'f e SS�'f% � �-/6 �� y�'�� Roger Peitso (�l(��` �C/ �`— �� Building Official � ' City of Orono j''� Q �`- G'� � S (��'�5 � �U �� e ' �� ' Direct: 952-249-6425 -y-- ,1 /;�� O � � /z(�./( (� � ��,�� Email: rpeitso@ci.orono.mn.us r �� `'� `- �K / Fax: 952-249-4616 y� rd ) ��,-� �S �yh �'t d f� RP: rp I � �� 5�' � � l� -�, c,� �`� r�v�� ,� �a �lc�� 5 �- � � �- �� t�e� �.�� uytc�r°� �J � � �_ ��`--- � DAT TIME CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN ��-'� INSPECTION NOTICE SCHEDULED �Q-�/S /�.'GrCJ PERMIT NO. ��s ��S�OMPLETED ADDRESS �� OWNER TELEPHONE NO.Y�'?" 7� L� CONTRACTOR �(IJI-G�Q.D >; DESCRIPTION � W ❑ FOOTING ❑ DEMO-FINAL ❑ SEPTIC FINAL Q ❑ POURED WALL ❑ PLUMBING RI ❑ EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING Q ❑ FOUNDATION WATERPROOF ❑ PLUMBING FINAL ❑ TREE REMOVAL Z ❑ RADON SLAB ❑ MECHANICAL RI ❑ SITE INSPECTION Q ❑ FRAMING ❑ MECHANICAL FINAL ❑ PROGRESS � ❑ INSULATION ❑ WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE ❑ COMPLAINT Q ❑ FINAL ❑ WATER HOOK-UP ❑ FOLLOW-UP 4! ❑ AS BUILT-SURVEY ❑ SEWER HOOK-UP ❑ HARD COVER REMOVAL J ❑ DEMO-SITE ❑ SEPTIC INSTALL ❑ FOUNDATION/REMOVAL 2 OWNERlCONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU:_YES_NO � CO MENTS: � . ! y c� /��'/ r' O � J a � � �v U ` �a� �� v�i� �u ° �QD " a f uf�s x�r�-- W ' � Q � C�U�v� a W � W � j d W ❑WORK SATISFACTORY:PROCEED ❑ PROJECT COMPLEfE � CORRECT WORK 8 PROCEED ❑ ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY W ❑ RECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY V BEFORECOVERING PERMANENT ❑CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. ❑ pHOTO TAKEN INSPECTOR WILL RETURN ❑STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR �CITATION ISSUED O INSPECTION REQUIRED_CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. Ca11 for the next inspection 24 hours in advance. (952) 249-4600 OwnedContract on site: . Inspector. White Copyllnspector's File Canary CopylSite Notice DATE TIM� CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN INSPECTION NOTICE SCHEDULED PERMIT NO. COMPL�ETED � � ADDRESS ��d'e (�r't-C Y OWNER / TELEPHONE NO. CONTRACTOR - `'� ��f/' � DESCRIPTION � O FOOTING ❑ PLUMBING FINAL ❑ EXCAV/GRADING/FIWNG Q O POURED WALL ❑ MECHANICAL RI ❑ LAKESHOREJWETLANDS y RAMING ❑ MECHANICAL FINAL � ❑ TREE REMOVAL ❑ I SULATION ❑ WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE TE INSPECTION � RADON SLAB ❑ WATER HOOK-UP ❑ PROGRESS � ❑ FINAL ❑ SEWER HOOK-UP ❑ COMPUUNT � ❑ DEMO-SITE ❑ SEPTIC MAINT. � FOLLOW-UP _ ❑ DEMO-FINAL ❑ SEPTIC INSTALL ❑ HARD COVER REMOVAL v � PLUMBING RI ❑ SEPTIC FINAL ❑ FOUNDATION/REMOVAL � OWNERICONTRACTOR TO MEET YiOU:_YES_NO y COMMENTS: � � o T�o �-! �=� �� ! r/� � ° �I /'�e o� 2 � � Q (�- G�l �'` �8 � v z e d � W � 3 a W WORKSATISFACTORIF.PROCEED ❑PROJECTCOMPLETE ❑CORRECT NlORK 8 PROCEED ❑ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY 0 ❑CORRECT WORK�LL FOR REtNSPECTION TEMPORARY V BEFORE COVERING PERMANENT ❑CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. ❑pHOTO TAKEN INSPECTOR WILL RETURN ❑CITATION ISSUED ❑STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR ❑INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. Call for the next inspection 24 hours in advance. (952) 249-4600 OwnerlContra on site: Inspector: ite Copyllnspector's Ffle Canary CopylSite Notice �=5 �" � ' / � D TE TIME V CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN 1 D � � � INSPECTION N��S_,�Q�HEDULED ' PERMIT NO. 0 PLEfED ` 1 ADDRESS ��L�i�/`e- OWNER a-d ELEPHONE NO.��' �`;�� CONTRACTOR ��ZLY1-� �r� � DESCRIPTION .�"U�L a� C�. � . W ❑ FOOTING ❑ DEMO-FINAL ❑ SEPTIC FINA� Q ❑ POURED WALL ❑ PLUMBING Rf ❑ EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING O ❑ FOUNDATION WATERPROOF ❑ PLUMBING FINAL ❑ TREE REMOVAL Z ❑ RADON SLAB ❑ MECHANICAL RI ❑ SITE INSPECTION Q ❑ FRAMING ❑ MECHANICAL FINAL ❑ RATED WALLS � ❑ INSULATION ❑ WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE ❑ COMPLAINT Q ❑ FINAL ❑WATER HOOK-UP ❑ FOLLOW-UP _ ❑ AS BUILT-SURVEY ❑ SEWER HOOK-UP ❑ FOUNDATION/REMOVAL r ❑ DEMO-SITE ❑ SEPTIC INSTALL Q OWNEAICONTMCTOR TO MEET YOU:_YES_NO ��., COMMEN 1 7 /� ��CCe l�l�? 4�"�-,I/1 � � G��t �G�l1 c'_ ✓l C �ri ' � � /� � �'tD�t� �Pdt i'O �' r `t'�� 5�� /'/15' d l �+fi �'1 �'t -Pv' � o � 1r ' f"t�! v � /��t � a l� W � -�"� �f '� v' �'� vi C � C�m� , e �� Q 2 � �� ' I r � �.� �-�l�C � o� �fQ � �P l'�er f�'�Lu �ha/ . ,� � . �u li� � d I/ W � C'C i l`�n� �.r�e6��r� f�o`tS�f� ��s u l� a n-f;��5� �i� d "i�m �^ r� �i` /O lil � i"C{d�l/�' W� ❑WOFiK SATISFACTORY:PROCEED i o PRW ECT COMPLETE W ❑CORRECT WORK 8 PROCEED �ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY � RECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY BEFORE CdVERING PERMANENT ❑CORRECT UNSAFE CONOITION WITHIN HOURS. p pH0T0 TAKEN INSPECTOR WFLLRETURN ❑STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR �CITATION ISSUED ❑INSPECTION RE(]UIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. Call forthe next inspection 24 hours in advance. (952) 249-46�� on site: � Inspect . WhiM CopyAnspector's File Canary CopylSfte Noties , DATE TIME 1� t CITYR�F ORONO CALLED IN INSPECTION�TIC 'Q � SCHEDULED =!�� PERMIT NO. � COMPLEfED � ADDRESS �J' ��/'�-ll�1� U'�'/ ✓ra OWNER TELEPHONE NO. CONTRACTOR � DESCRIPTION � � ❑ FOOTiNG ❑ PLUMBING FINAL ❑ EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING Q ❑ POURED WALL O MECHANICAL RI ❑ LAKESHORE/WETLANDS y ❑ FRAMING ❑ MECHANICAL FINAL � ❑ TREE REMOVAL Z ❑ INSULATION ❑ WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE ❑ SITE INSPECTION Q � RADON SLAB ❑ WATER HOOK-UP O PROGRESS � ❑ FINAL ❑ SEWER HOOK-UP ❑ COMPLAINT J ❑ DEMO-SITE ❑ SEPTIC MAINT. ❑ FOLLOW-UP ? ❑ DEMO-FINAL ❑ SEPTIC INSTALL ❑ HARD COVER REMOVAL J ❑ PLUMBING RI ❑ SEPTIC FINAL � FOUNDATION/REMOVAL 2 OWNERICONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU:_YES_NO y COMMENTS: � / d!r �C/C '� l'�„7�f o ho mr� � � �iv '' �� '��n ,h, a��,'4�m r� � ° -� � �d �f i� W -/ Q (Q I� �C �//l T� � =� � OGCc� G z � � s � W � J d W� ❑WORK SATISFACTORY:PROCEED ❑ PROJECT COMPLETE W ❑CORRECT WORK&PROCEED ❑ ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY � CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY � ORECWERING PERMANENT ❑CORRECT UNSAFE CONDIT�ON WITHIN HOURS. p pHOTO TAKEN INSPECTOR WILL REfURN ❑CITATION ISSUED ❑STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR ❑INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. Call for the next inspection 24 hours in advance. (g52) 249-460� OwnerlContra n site: Inspector White Copyllnspector's File Canary CopylSfte Notice �— ��/f,�"r. TE TIME CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN � INSPECTION TI c SCHEDULED O? � —� : PERMIT NO. �d ��`�� co PLEfED ADDRESS OWNER TELEPHONE NOJ��'? 70 � �� CONTRACTOR D�llf��QCY�'_ � DESCRIPTION 4� ❑ FOOTING ❑ DEMO-FINAL ❑ SEPTIC FINAL Q ❑ POURED WALL ❑ PLUMBING RI ❑ EXCAV/GRADING/FILLING y ❑ FOUNDATION WATERPROOF PLUMBING FINAL ❑ TREE REMOVAL Z ❑ RADON SLAB ❑ MECHANICAL RI ❑ SITE INSPECTION Q ❑ FRAMING ❑ MECHANICAL FINAL ❑ RATED WALLS � ❑ INSULATION ❑ WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE ❑ COMPLAINT � FINAL ❑ WATER HOOK-UP ❑ FOLLOW-UP � ❑ A BUILT-SURVEY ❑ SEWER HOOK-UP ❑ FOUNDATION/REMOVAL J ❑ DEMO-SITE ❑ SEPTIC INSTALL 2 OWNERICONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU:_YES_NO � COMMENTS:� c'r��/�'1�(� �"�'t-i a��L ` C� a �/ / � !�C4'a^t C, �� j 1 �p {�c 1 C{ o ' � ' �� .r� � y'� � 9�1 ' �Z ° ,�, � '` ��dv� W _ Q X�j�� j`�`t� � � � �" — 2 � �l ��4 6(/ — �� I`�C/ �'v"a+�e..� .� � �Z-f�l� —Q��l7 , c d W ❑WORKSATISFACTORY:PROCEED ❑ PROJECT COMPLEfE � ❑CORRECT WORK 8 PROCEED ❑ ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY W • � CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY FORE CWERING PERMANENT ❑CORRECTUNSAFECONDITIONWITHIN HOURS. ❑ pHOTOTAKEN INSPECTOR WFLL RETURN ❑STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOii �CITATION ISSUED ❑INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS. Ca11 for the next inspection 24 hours in advance. (g52) 249-460� OwnerfContracto n site: Inspector. � d White Copyllnspector's File Canary CopylSite Notice