HomeMy WebLinkAboutRe: proposed addition tw�n c�tti+ test�nq
corporat�on
0 662 CROMWELL AVENUE
ST. PAUL, MN 55114
PHONE 612/645-3601
November 26, 1991 � - �
i
�
I
Rick's Super Value
3333 Shoreline Drive
Navarre, MN 55392 ����, 2 2991
Attn: Rick Bloomquist
Subj: Addition to Rick's Super Value
Navarre, Minnesota
TCT #4220 92-1014.01
At the request of D J Miller Construction, we have performed observations of soils within the subgrade of the
drive-parking area at the loading dock on the western side of the addition to the Rick's Super Valu. The
purpose of this letter is to summarize the results of our observation and recommendations provided to project
personnel at the construction site during the time of our visits.
Within this area, the construction will consist of a 6" cast-in-place concrete slab placed over 6" of sand fill.
The slab will be utilized for parking of tractor-trailer rigs at the loading dock. Available information regarding
subsurface soil conditions in this portion of the site indicates the soils would probably consist of previously
placed fill which may overly somewhat compressible topsoil.
On October 21, 1991, we made our initial observation of soils within the referenced area. During this visit,
we observed that the subgrade soils consisted of previously placed cohesive fill which ranged from moist to
wet. The majority of the subgrade soils were in a somewhat unstable condition as evidenced by rutting and
deflection which occurred during the passage of construction equipment. During our visit, we indicated to
project personnel that in order to provide a stable subgrade and eliminate the potential for settlement of the on-
grade concrete construction, it would be necessary to remove all previously placed fill as well as topsoil which
may underlie this fill system. We also indicated that if the risk of some potential settlement of the concrete
construction is acceptable to the property owner, it may be feasible to provide a suitable stable subgrade within
the upper portion of the subgrade profile by means of a less extensive excavate/refill system. We indicated
that improvement of the surficial portion of the subgrade soils could be achieved using either of the following
two alternatives:
Alternate One. This alternate would consist of excavation of the existing subgrade to a depth of about 3-1/2'
below planned subgrade. The exposed subcut should then be test rolled with construction equipment in order
to determine if additional subcut would be required. Planned subgrade elevation should then be reestablished
by placement of a cohesive type fill. The fill should be compacted to 100% of the Standard Proctor density
(ASTM:D698). In addition, the fill must be placed at a moisture content at or below the optimum moisture
AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS,THE PUBLIC AND OURSELVES.ALL TWIN CITY TESTING CORPORATION REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY OF CUENTS.
AND AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBLICATION OF STATEMENTS.CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTIONS FROM OR REGARDING OUR REPORTS IS RESERVED PENDING OUR PRIOR WRITTEN APPAOVAL.
Mr. Rick Bloomquist
November 26, 1991
Page Two
determined by the standard proctor method. In our opinion, proper compaction of a cohesive fill at the proper
moisture content at this time of the year may be difficult to achieve.
Alternate Two. This alternate would consist of somewhat less extensive excavation of the existing subgrade
soils. The alternate would consist of excavation to a depth ranging from about 2' to 3' below planned
subgrade. The subcut excavation should then be refilled to grade with a well compacted free-drainin�
sand/gravel. In order to discharge water which may collect within the granular soils placed over the less
permeable cohesive soils, we recommend that a perforated draintile be installed within the bottom of the
granular fill. The draintile should be discharged into the nearby storm sewer system or daylighted to th�
adjacent slope, which ever would be acceptable to appropriate authorities. We recommend the bottom of the
subcut excavation be sloped to the location of the draintile in order to provide drainage for the entire subgrade
area.
In our opinion, use of the second alternative would be most preferable and should result in a more stable
subgrade which would be less susceptible to moist-volume expansion upon freezing.
After our initial site visit, we were informed that Alternate Two as described above would be used to improve
the present subgrade stability. On October 25, 1991, we observed the soils in this area at completion of the
recommended subcut excavation. At this time, the depth of subcut below planned finished subgrade range frcm
1' to 1.5' in the extreme southeast portion of the slab area, to about 2' in the central portion, and 2.5' to 3'
along the western edge and northern portion of the subcut area, just south of the existing storm sewer catch
basins. The soils exposed at the completion of this subcut consisted of lean clay, sandy lean clay, silty sand
and clayey sand. These soils, were judged to be suitable for placement of the clean granular sand fi11. VVe
did recommend to project personnel that the surface of the subcut excavation be recompacted just prior to
placement of the sand fill.
If we can be of further assistance please contact us.
Very truly yours,
-� -� � /
�.-�-�.��-�,_ �;-�=���4;6--: ';
�
Gary . Larson Ronald A. Shaffer, P.E.
Field Engineer Principal Geotechnical Engineer
GAL/RAS/sal
AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS,THE PUBLIC AND OURSELVES.ALL TWIN CITY TESTING CORPORATION REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY OF CLIENTS,
AND AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBLICATION OF STATEMENTS,CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTIONS FROM OR REGARDING OUR REPORTS IS RESERVED PENDING OUR PRIOR WRITTEN APPROVAL.
' BONESTR00 AND ASSOCIATES � 612 6361311 01/14/97 10:34 � :01/02 N0:214
. � , ,
BOnPstroo.Rnsrne,AnQr�lik nnQAssOCia!�•z.fnC is artRllirmaUvcA�rron fyu<rlOp{.�u�t:,���r.� °r�i:k�;�,.��
BonestrooPnn[rpars Otto G.Bunrsupu, i�E � lusrph C AndrnrK PE •��7.trvtn: Stit':nln ^E � �
- RicharA E.lumcr,Y.E.•Glrnn R Coos..PE • Tnoma:F NOyex.FF •RnDer[G Sc���n�chc r�i •
Rosenelerry A Bourdon,!'[.• Robert W' Rusena�'E .�rtd Su:an M Ebe•ri,n C Pn Sen��i�Cu��s�:�c����:
� Attoaate Pnnapels�Now,�rd A.S+nford.RF..• Ke�th A.Gwtlon. PE .R6Dert R ?f��l!rrl�• PC . �.�"'
Anderlik & RichrrC W�Fos[er.PE •n,ivid O Losko[a RE •RODert C R�55ek A f A •Mart A N.+ni��n PF •�
MKn2N T.Rau[mrnn,PE.•TrA K.Firid,FtE.•Nrnrtcth R,1n�7rrson.PC •M.vk R Rolf:,PE •
Assoeiates SiOney P Wllflamson.PE.�S •Robert F M.otsmnh
DI/icn�.St.Paul.Rothester.'b'dlm.r;�nc1 C, flouA.MN. Mrquon.WI
Engineers & Architecis
���z���
�� .�,.,,:....,.y.,.. ��
� 1"�.Sn-!"ni�� �a�
lanuary 15, 1997 ��'�♦.V,��.',
Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth, .
Building and Zoning Administrator
City of Orono
Post Office Box 66 �
Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323
Re: Rick's Super Valu
File No. 139-2107
Dear Jeanne,
We have reviewed the site plans for the proposed building addition and access relocation at Rick's
Super Valu located at the southwest corner of Shadywood Road (CSAH l9) and Shoreline Drive
{CSAH 15) in Navarre. The addition includes a drive-up bank teller. The City and Watershed
District approved an addition to the site in 1991 and addressed many of the storm drainage and
access issues at that time. We offer the following comments in regards to engineering mattcrs for
the proposed addition. .
The site access is a concern because of the high traf�c volumes on CSAH 15 and CSAH 19. The
proposal to close the existing east access and create a common access at the property line is
desirable. This change will move the east access approximately 70 feet further from the signalized
interseetion which will improve the traffic circulation in the vicinity. The radii on this access
should be revised to show a 25'radius out to CSAH 19 for vaffic entering the parking lot. Hennepin
County should review the site plans and comment on the proposed access.
The new access location wiil require a reconfiguration of the parking lot to allow for the turning
movements of commercial vehicles. The reconfiguration shown on the plans provides adequate
space to maneuver these vehicics, but will add 1,632 square feet of hardcover to the site. This
increase amounts to a 2 percent increase in hardcover which we feel is an insignificant addicion to
the storm water pond approved in 1991. The applicant should obtain Minnehaha Creek Watershed
District approval.
The additional pazking lot pavement near the loading dock should be designed for 9 ton Ioading with
concrete curb and gutter. Erosion control measures should be installed around CB#2 prior to
- beginning the grading operations near the east loading dock.
The proposed drive-up bank teller is located close to the main entrance to the store. This location
wi(1 allow possibty only one vehicie stacking before a third vehicle blocks the entrance. This may
2335 West Highway 3b � St. Paut, MN 55113-3898 ■ G12-b36-4600
BONESTR00 AND ASSOCIATES � 612 6361311 01/14/97 10:34 � :02/02 N0:21�
,. , . .
,
i
��_
Ms. Jeanne A. Mabusth January I5, 1997
City of Orono
Page -2-
create problems with the stare customers. The location of the parcel pickup is too close to the
nearest parking stall in that area. We would recommend that this parking stall be eliminated to allow
at least 33 feet between the bcaiiding and parking area. The diagonal parking stalls along the west
property line shouid have signs to indicate "employee parking only" or"15 minute limit" to avoid
conflicts with the use of the west loading dock.
When the plans have been completed we will prepare an estimate af the total cost for the site
improvements tQ determine the amount of the financial guarantee required.
Please contact me at this of�ce if you have any questions regarding this matter.
Yours very truly,
BONESTROO, ROSENE, ANDERLIK & ASSOCIATES, P,VC.
�. �
Shawn D. Gustafson, P.E.
' , � .. , ,
..�-a-----
�r-
�:.
PARKING ANALYSIS FOR NON CUB FOODS STORES
TOWN STATE BLDG S.F. CARS C.M.A.
� ASHLAND WI 31,500 53 1.7
2 VALLEY CITY ND 20,360 45 2.2
3 PRINCETON MN 7,520 33 4.4
a MILACA MN 12,760 60 4.7
5 MANDAN ND 31,370 163 5.2
s OSHKOSH WI 56,850 300 5.3
7 OWATONNA MN 45,970 250 5.4
s REDWING MN 25,000 137 5.5
s BALDWIN WI 22,500 126 5.6
�o DEEPHAVEN MN 18,300 110 6.0
�� CHASKA MN 27,460 � 168 6.1
�2 BUFFALO MN 27,000 171 6.3
�3 DULUTH MN 27,500 194 7.1
1a JANESVILLE MN 43,200 310 7.2
�5 MINOT ND 31,760 246 7.7
�s MARSHALL MN 32,500 270 8.3
�� NAVARRE MN 29,490 121 4.1
�e (SALES AREA) 17,830 121 6.8
ts CITY OF ORONO MN 150 1 6.7
i � � �� � � o = � 9 c� -- ;: _ . < �' � �
' ..�
�� � (P(o Q � �Z � _ � �— C.8'�C.�— .. . '' , y , 4,� , .
a__._.-----
�---�r�-I „`) i � i
v �•�v- ( � �
Prepared by BKH 1/21/97 Page 1
� ''� � � r.ay.--
• ��.�
January 3, 1997 (Revised January 17, 1997)
Parking Analysis and Comparisons for Cub Foods Stores and various Minneapolis/St.Paul Area Cities.
City RetaiUGrocery Cub Foods Stores
Parking Requirement Parking Provided
(Stalls/1000 sq. ft.) (Where applicable)
Burnsville 10/1000 sales plus �.9511000(existing store)
5/1000 office/storage 6.49/1000(proposed store)
(Approx.8.37/1000 gross area for the 6.88/1000(prop.Store wlproof of pazking
proposed Cub)•
Apple Valley �/1000 5.711000
Eagan 5/1000 5/1000
Lalceville 5/1000 NA
Savage 5/1000 NA
Prior Lake 5/1000 NA
Chanhassen 5/1000 NA
Edina 5/1000 4.8/1000
Brooklya Parlc 5/1000 6/1000
Stillwater �/1000 6.75/1000
� �taple Grove 5/1000 6.3/1000
Champtia �/1000 6.9/1000(proposed County Markac score)
Plymouth • � 5/1000 �1A
, Cottage Grove �/1000 NA
Maplewood 5/1000 63/1000(East Storc)
Blaine �.1/1000* 6.1�/1000
woodbury 5.4/1000 5.6/t000
Coon Rapids 5-5.5/1000 5.6/1000
St Louis Park 5.6/1000 NA
Eden Prairie 6/1000 6.1/1000
Sc Anthony 4.1/1000* 5.7/1000
St.Paul�fidway 4/1000 5.4/1000
Miaaetonka 4/i 000 � 6.6/1000
' Crystal �l1000 6.35/1000
Minneapolis 333/1000 4.26/1000(60'�&Nicollet)
*Numbers represent an average per 1000 sq.R when various formulas are applied to the propbsed Burnsville store.
� �
Y �� ��a �
THE CARPENTEI2'S CONTIZACTING, INC. �J�� ,�,��,� �j�
� 1 1 0 5 C O U N T 1' K O A D 1 9, M O U N D, M N 5 5 3 6 4
���� (952) 472-5715 FAX (952) 472-2910 ����o-//7.� ��//-����"
_.__------_--- -- --- ___
SCOPE ��L��'
SUBMITTED TO: Rick's Super Valu
3333 Shoreline Drive
Navarre, MN 55391
JOB NAME: Misc. Interior Projects
DATE: September 27, 2001
We propose to remodel the above Store as follows:
I. Interior Work:
A. Decor Work
1. Decor Demolition:
-Cover surrounding areas, all products during the demolition
-Provide dumpsters, and debris hauling
-Remove the sloped decor ceiling panels at the deli, across the rear of the
store and the meat department and dispose.
-Remove the ceiling decor drops over the two frozen wide islands. Remove
to the surrounding edging. The lighting to remain intact above
-Remove the ceiling tile in the drop over the produce island and store.
Reinstall after the grid has been painted.
-Remove all of the foam decor lettering and upper foam stripe dispose
2. Wall Repair:
-Skim coat all the walls where damaged by the removal of the lettering and
patch all walls damaged by the removal of the sloped lighted canopies.
-paint a11 the perimeter walls with Two coats of latex paint.
-Paint the two part Polymix striping as per the updated plan around the
perimeter of the store.
-decor installation at an additional cost.
3. Electrical:
-includes the removal of all of the perimeter lighting under the sloped decor
panels and dispose.
-Installation of the decor lighting covers in the coffin drops at an additional
cost
-Install all pendant lighting as per the plan.
-Install the track lighting as per plan
-Fixtures supplied by the owner
4. Flooring Work:
1
�
-Remove the perimeter floor tile as per the plan and dispose
-Repair the concrete as needed
-Furnish and install the new floor tile as specified.
-The customer is responsible to strip and refinish floor after installation
-Also includes the installation of field tile in the two offices and the break
room.
-No base noted on plans
-Planned to be done as night work
-Check stand Area:
-Furnish and install Amtico `Stratica' as per plan, in the front
checkstand area. Includes the removal and disposal of the existing tile, prep and installation of the
new tile with the proper adhesives.
B. Interior Work-Remodeling/Repair
1. Break room:
-Replace the ceiling tile, and clean the grid in the break room, reset the
existing lighting and sprinkler heads
-Remove and dispose of the e�sting cabinet and counter top. Furnish and
install approximately 6'0" of new melamine or similar upper and lower
cabinets. These will be a simple kitchen style cabinet with washable surfaces
inside and out, with a plastic laminate counter top and back splash.
-Reinstall the e�sting sink and faucet
-provide new coat hook racks
-Paint the walls, two coats latex paint
-Furnish and install new vinyl base
-new lockers available upon request
2. Bathrooms:
-Remove, paint and reinstall the existing partitions
3. Deli Service Area:
-Rotisserie Area
-Furnish and install a 120" by 48" by 27" high stainless steel grease
hood, welded ducting and roof top exhaust. Includes 4,000 CFM
make up air unit with new gas line from the meter (e�sting is not
large enough)and appropriate ductwork. Includes roofing crane and
gas hook up for the new rotisserie.
-Install hood Ansul fire suppressant system and relocate one fire
sprinkler head as needed.
-Frame, sheetrock and fire tape a double wall duct enclosure as
per code
-Remove the e�cisting cabinets and dispose. Install the customers' tables
-Wire the make up air system, exhaust hood, fire in the hood controls, move
lights, gas shut down system and rotisserie with shut down system
4. Produce Prep Area:
2
i�
-Remove a11 of the upper shelves, plywood as needed
-Demo the store room walls back to the main wall and dispose
-Frame a new return air duct enclosure, sheetrock and tape as needed
-Frame a new ceiling drop wa11 above and sheetrock.
-Cover a11 wa11s with glass board as per code
-Epoxy paint the rear concrete block wall, paint any exposed painted surfaces
as needed.
-Furnish and install a new washable 2x4 suspended ceiling
-Furnish and install a new VCT floor with vinyl base.
-Provide a stainless steel base at the exterior wa11 of the two coolers
-Furnish and install four 2x4 lay in flourescent lights
-Lower the existing unit heater and a11 associated piping and electrical
-Install the customer's shelving on the back wall (only)
5. Trenching, if required by the refrigeration company under separate contract.
II. Egterior Work:
Exterior Work based on plans dated, September 20, 2001
A. Egterior Parapet watls;
-The new parapet wa11s will be framed on top of the existing walls, then covered with
plywood.
-The parapet walls will be framed to include a sloped roof system with a back wall
resting on the existing roof system. The rear wall will be cut into the existing roofing,
and will sit on the roof deck metal, near the nearest steel beam.
-The existing built-up roofing will be flashed and repaired as needed at the back wa11s
of the new facade. We have estimated that the entry area will result in a 5'wide wa11
and the bagger's area will have a 3'0" wide wall.
-A standing seam roof will be installed on the sloped roof sections on both wa11s. -
Matching roof cap will be installed across the balance of the front of the store. The
balance of the existing roof cap will be painted to match the new.
-Steel horizontal lap siding and trim will be installed across the front face of the
sections as per the drawings.
-Steel soffit material will be installed across the underside of the soffits
-The four columns will be framed to the proper height and covered with plywood.
-An EFIS system will be applied to the balance of the existing block columns
including the new framed walls.
-Install the owner's four shoebox lights and two gooseneck lights.
B. Painting;
-Power wash the building
-Apply latex top coat by spray painting two coats of latex paint
-Repaint the e�sting painted doors
3