HomeMy WebLinkAboutWetland Delineation-2017 � � � � •
�
. 1 • - - �
• • •
' • - • 1
REPORT FOR: FROM:
Pat Schumacher Lucas Mueller
Nor-Son Inc. ISG
700 East Lake Street, Suite 213 7900 International Drive, Suite 550
Wayzata, MN, 55391 Minneapolis, MN, 55425
952.767.7931 952.426.0699
pat.schumacher@nor-son.com Lucas.mueller@is-grp.com
, . . - -�
��
T�f?! 4r- ���, , , r.,, . � I\f-T""�
ExecutiveSummary ............................................................................................................... 1
ProjectDescription................................................................................................................. 1
Definitions + Methodology....................................................................................................... 2
Findings ............................................................................................................................... 5
Recommendations ................................................................................................................. 7
Data Sources + Literature Cited............................................................................................... 8
Table 1. Delineated Wetland Summary...................................................................................... 1
Table 2. Vegetation Indicator Status Delineated Wetland Summary............................................... 3
._: : � - f �.�
Appendix A: Figure 1. Project Location..................................................................................... A
Figure 2. DNR Public Waters Inventory and National Wetlands Inventory
Figure 3. Hennepin County Soil Survey
Figure 4. LiDAR Elevations & Hillshade
Figure 5. Aerial Photograph
Appendix B: Figure 6. Wetland Delineation Map......................................................................... B
Wetland Delineation Data Forms
Appendix C: Antecedent Precipitation Data ............................................................................... C
Photo Log
Appendix D: Joint Application Form for Activities Affecting Water Resources in Minnesota................. D
Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Application
1760 Shoreline Dr. - Wetland Delineation Report Page i
ISG Project No. 20712
�x�r�
Certification
1760 SHORELINE DR. — ORONO, MN
LEVEL 2 WETLAND DELINEATION
ISG PRO]ECT NO. 20712
I hereby certify the above-described routine on-site Level 2 wetland delineation was performed on July
6, 2017. The wetland delineation meets standards and criteria specified in the Regional Supplement to
the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Midwest Region.
.G����c��'�-
Lucas Mueller
Environmental Scientist
I hereby certify the quality assurance review of this wetland delineation report was completed by me
or under my direct supervision, and that I am a Certified Wetland Delineator in the State of Minnesota.
'�
Travis Fristed, PWS (#2360), MN WDC (#1169)
Senior Environmental Scientist/Environmental Services Group Manager
1760 Shoreline Dr. - Wetland Delineation Report Page ii
ISG Project No. 20712
a„�,�,':�,`^�� `��:
Executive Summary
ISG completed a wetland investigation within a roughly 4 acre property located in Hennepin County for
the purpose of future development on the property. The property field work was completed on July 6,
2017.
This wetland investigation was performed in accordance with the 1987 US Army Corps of Engineers
Wetland Delineation Manual and the 2010 Midwest Regional Supplement, and all applicable supporting
documents for areas meeting wetland criteria for a routine wetland delineation in accordance to the
MN Wetland Conservation Act and the US Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 Program.
Vegetation, soii and hydrology sampling have been completed on all potential wetland areas within the
project area. Wetland determinations were based on the three required technical criteria: occurrence
of hydric soil, predominance of hydrophytic vegetation, and the presence of one primary and/or two
secondary indicators of wetland hydrology.
Table 1. Delineated Wetland Summary
. , � � , ,
. -
.� � •� -
L16A (Hydric)
PEMB, Fresh (wet) 1.62 Acres &
A Type PEM1C, Meadow, Shallow ��0,547 Sq. L132A PEM1F 27086600
2,3,6 PSSC Marsh, Shrub- Ft) (Predominantly
Carr
Hydric)
Project D�scription
PRC?_7FCT PURP�JSE
ISG was retained to identify and delineate all wetland areas that exist within the project boundaries.
The wetland investigation boundary (or project area) encompasses approximately 4 acres located on
Shoreline Dr. The purpose of the wetland investigation is to accurately identify wetland areas onsite so
that they can be incorporated into plans for any future development of the property.
This report is intended to facilitate any regulatory discussions of Wetland Conservation Act and Clean
Water Act Section 10/404 permitting for this project.
1760 Shoreline Dr. - Wetland Delineation Report Page 1
ISG Project No. 20712
�,.:�. � � �=
t�� _ ,e �
The investigation area is located south and east of Heritage Lane in Section 10, T117N, R23W, in the
city of Orono, Minnesota (See Appendix A for a location map). The PIN is 053-1011723140017. The
site is located within the Long Creek minor watershed (20092) and the Mississippi River-Twin Cities
major watershed (20). The topography of the site is undulating with rolling hills. Site elevation ranges
from approximately 936' to 976' above msl. At the time of this delineation, the investigation area was
composed of a manicured lawn, a forested strip along the east property line, and a wetland complex
to the south.
The investigation area is located in a partially wooded area within moderately spaced single-family
homes. The investigation area is located to the south and east of Heritage Lane, north of Shoreline
Drive (CSAH 15) and east of South Brown Road (CSAH 146). Lake Minnetonka (Smith Bay) is located
to the south of the project area. Tanager Lake, a part of Lake Minnetonka is located to the northeast
of the project area.
Defir� itions + Methoc�alogy
This investigation was performed in accordance with the US Army Corps of Engineers 1987 Wetland
Delineation Manual and the 2010 Midwest Regional Supplement, and all applicable supporting
documents for areas meeting wetland criteria for a routine wetland delineation in accordance to the
Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act and the US Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 Program. The
following definitions, diagnostic environmental characteristics, and the methodology used is based on
the mandatory technical criteria for the identification and delineation of wetlands.
As defined in 33 CFR Part 328, Section 3, the term wetlands is defined as: Those areas that are
inundated or saturated by surface or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support,
and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life
in saturated soil conditions. The frequency and duration of saturation may vary by geographical
region, and is largely dependent upon climatic conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps,
marshes, bogs, and similar areas.
�.
1760 Shoreline Dr. - Wetland Delineation Report Page 2
ISG Project No. 20712
x4,�_:
Wetlands have the following general diagnostic environmental characteristics:
Hydrophytic Vegetation
The wetland vegetation criterion is satisfied when the prevalent vegetation consists of plant
species adapted to inundation or substrates periodicaily deficient in oxygen as a result of
prolonged saturation. Specifically, this includes plant communities that under normal
circumstances have more than 50% of the composition of the dominant species from all strata
ranked with an indicator status as obligate wetland (OBL), facultative wetland (FACW), and/or
facultative (FAC) species.
The indicator status for individual plants as defined by the updated 2016 Minnesota National
Wetland Piant List are identified and described in the following table:
Table 2. Vegetation Indicator Categories
. . • -.• • - •
Obligate (OBL) Almost always
Facultative Wetland (FACW) Usually
Facultative (FAC) Equally likely to occur in uplands
Facultative Upland (FACU) Rarely
Upland (UPL) Almost never
Hydric Soil
A hydric soil is a soil formed under conditions of saturation, flooding, or ponding long enough
during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part. Examples of hydric
soil indicators include: the accumulation of organic matter, low-chroma soil matrices, gleying,
redox concentrations, redox depletions, and hydrogen sulfide odor.
Wetland Hydrology
According to the 1987 manual, wetland hydrology is present when the area is inundated either
permanently or periodically at mean water depths less than or equal to 6.6 feet, or the soil is
saturated to the surface at some time during the growing season. The Midwest Regional
Supplement requires fourteen (14) or more consecutive days of flooding or ponding, or a water
table of twelve (12) inches (30 cm) or less below the soil surface, during the growing season at a
minimum frequency of five (5) years in ten (10) (50% or higher probability) to satisfy wetland
hydrology.
The wetland hydrology criterion can be satisfied with observation of one (1) primary hydrology
indicator or two (2) secondary hydrology indicators. Potential primary indicators of wetland
hydrology may include, but are not limited to: inundation, saturation, water marks, drift lines,
sediment deposits, and a thin muck surface. Potential secondary indicators of wetland hydrology
1760 Shoreline Dr. - Wetland Delineation Report Page 3
ISG Project No. 20712
may include, but are not limited to: surface soil cracks, drainage patters, saturation visible on
aerial imagery, and the FAC-neutral test.
Map Review
Prior to fieldwork, several mapping sources were consulted to identify potential wetland habitats.
The sources consulted include the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National
Wetland Inventory (NWI), United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS), formerly Soil Conservation Service (SCS) Soil Survey, Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Public Waters Inventory (PWI), and United States
Geological Survey (USGS) Topographic maps. Areas indicating evidence of potential wetland
conditions were evaluated in greater detail through fieldwork.
Precipitation Data Analysis
Precipitation data from the Minnesota Climatology Working Group and Natural Resources
Conservation Service WETS Tables were used in conjunction with the NRCS Method for Evaluating
Antecedent Moisture Conditions to determine precipitation conditions under which the
investigation was conducted.
, .
�
_ , ��"��,,, e � -, � � .
Field Sampling Procedures
Sample transects were established in representative transition zones between wetland and upland
for each observed plant community. For potential wetland areas greater than five acres in size, a
minimum of three transects were established along the baseline wetland boundary for lengths of
up to one mile, three to five transects for one to two miles, five to eight transects for two to four
miles, and eight or more transects for wetland baseline boundaries that exceed four miles in
length. Transect intervals do not exceed 0.5 mile apart from each other.
Transects are comprised of two sample points, one sample in upland and one sample point in
wetland. A field data sheet was completed describing the dominant soil characteristics (to a
minimum of 24 inches below the soil surface), plant communities, and hydrology indicators at the
sample point. The presence of water was observed after time (depending on soil characteristics)
was allowed for movement of water through the soil substrate. Absolute percent areal cover was
recorded for the species that were observed (which may exceed 100% total area due to overlap)
and dominance was determined by using the 50/20 rule.
1760 Shoreline Dr. - Wetland Delineation Report Page 4
ISG Project No. 20712
�
Vegetation was sampled within each stratum present at a sample point using the following circular
plot sizes:
• Trees - 30 ft radius
• Saplings and Shrubs - 15 ft radius
• Herbaceous - 5 ft radius
• Woody Vines - 30 ft radius
The sample points were marked with 4-foot lathe, photographed, and flagged with surveyor's tape
(if not within an agricultural land use). Other samples were taken at unmarked locations to
provide verification of the wetland edge, as needed.
Wetland Boundary Delineation
The wetland boundaries were determined using changes in topography, dominance of
hydrophytic/non-hydrophytic vegetation, hydric soil indicators, and/or hydrology characteristics.
Wetland edges were marked with pink"wetland delineation" flags. The wetland edge is considered
to be the highest extent of the wetland basin. Areas below the flagged edge satisfy the three
required wetland criteria while areas above were lacking in one or more of these criteria.
US Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Guidance Letter 90-6 requires documentation sufficient to
allow a reasonably accurate replication of the delineation at a future date. Reasonably accurate is
defined as within 0-2 meters accuracy. Precise positions of sample points and the wetland edge
have been located by a sub-meter GPS unit and have been included in the wetland delineation
drawing or map for this property.
Wetland Type Classification
Wetlands were classified using Wet/and Plants and P/ant Communities of Minnesota and Wisconsin
(Eggers & Reed 2007), Classification of Wet/ands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States
(Cowardin, et al, 1979) and Wetlands of the United States (Fish and Wildlife Service Circular 39,
Shaw and Fredine 1971).
Findings
������ t��- ,� s=��_.�;
The NWI map lists one NWI signature in the southern half of the investigation area. The basin is listed
as a Palustrine Emergent Persistent Semi Permanently Flooded wetland (PEM1F). The basin complex is
shown in Figure 2, Appendix A.
1760 Shoreline Dr. - Wetland Delineation Report Page 5
ISG Project No. 20712
Soils within the investigation boundary have been mapped by the NRCS along with their hydric
classification. The location of each soil unit occurring within the investigation boundary is shown on
the Hennepin County Soil Survey map (Figure 3, Appendix A).
There is one DNR Public Water waterbody located within the investigation area, an unnamed pond
(27086600), which is located on the southern half of the property. The southern portion of the
property also borders Lower Laker Minnetonka.
The LiDAR map (Figure 4, Appendix B) illustrates the highest elevations in the north east corner of the
property. Elevations slope from north to the south of the property, ranging from 988 feet above msl in
the north half to 930 feet above msl in the south portion of the investigation area.
� , , ,
The precipitation received in the project area during the previous three months was within the above
average range (over the 70th percentile) for this area. Prior to the sample date of July 6th 2017, there
was higher than average precipitation in April and May, and normal precipitation in June. Therefore
the field work was completed under wet conditions according to the precipitation worksheet for
wetland delineations (Appendix C). On July 5th 2017, 0.80 inches of rain was recorded by MN
Climatology Group about 3 miles north of the project area.
Based on the data reviewed and fieldwork conducted, one (1) area was examined for wetland
characteristics within the project area. One (1) wetland was ultimately delineated and is further
described within this report. The delineated wetland is identified as Wetlands A, which include sample
points 1-2.
Field data forms for each sample point are located in Appendix B. Refer to Figure 6 (Appendix B) for a
map of the project boundary, wetland basins, sampling transects, and area. Photos of the wetland
basin within the project boundary are included in Appendix C.
There is an approximate 8 acre Type 3 wetland (1.62 acres of which is within the project boundary)
located adjacent to the project area. The Type 3 wetland is listed as an unnamed DNR Public
Waterway and is listed as a PEM1F on the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI). Lower Lake Minnetonka
(Smith Bay) is located directly across Shoreline Dr. to the south of the investigated area. There are no
listed USGS streams within the investigation area.
1760 Shoreline Dr. - Wetland Delineation Report Page 6
ISG Project No. 20712
§ Y
���' ^ i�.�t�> �' �r��•1l�,�?Y
Wetland A
Wetland A is a 1.62 acre wetland located on the southern half of the project area. The wetland
boundary was first observed at the toe slope of the hill to the north of Wetland A. Wetland A contains
a Type 2 reed canary grass buffer before transitioning into a Type 3 cattail marsh. A Type 6 shrub-carr
wetland was observed in the southwest corner of the property. Wetland A consists of 0.16 acres of
Type 2 (wet meadow), 0.11 acres of Type 6 (shrub-Carr), and 1.34 acres of Type 3 (shallow marsh).
The Wetland boundary was determined by an abrupt change in elevation and vegetation. The
vegetation to the north of the wetland boundary is continuously mowed and maintained, unlike the
hydrophytic vegetation within the wetland.
ReCQtT1C1"le(�d��IC�nS
Activities impacting or potentially impacting the wetlands identified are regulated through several
levels of government in Minnesota:
• Fed21"dl: US Army Corps of Engineers: Permit Programs under Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act and Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act
• Fed21'al: USDA NRCS: Wetland Conservation Provisions of the 1996 Farm Bill
• Stdt2 of Minnesota: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources: Public Waters Work
Permit Program
• LOCdI: Local Units of Government (LGU) administer the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act
(WCA) of 1991.
Please note that grading, excavating, or filling is not allowed until all necessary permits have been
obtained. If wetland impacts are proposed, ISG can assist in the proper steps to acquire the
appropriate permit or exemption. By initiating the permit process as soon as possible, potential costly
delays to the project may be avoided.
1760 Shoreline Dr. - Wetland Delineation Report Page 7
ISG Project No. 20712
z�� �
Data Sou rces + Literatu re Cited
Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and R.T. LA Roe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deep
water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, FWS/OBS-79/31.
Eggers, S.D., and Reed, D.M. 1997. Wetland Plants and Plant Communities of Minnesota and
Wisconsin. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District. 1997.
Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Wetlands Research
Program Technical Report Y-87-1, US Army Engineers Waterways Experiment Station.
Environmental Laboratory. August 2010. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland
Delineation Manual: Midwest Region. ERDC/EL TR-10-16. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
Lichvar, R.W., D.L. Banks, W.N. Kirchner, and N.C. Melvin. 2016. The Nationa/ Wet/and P/ant List:
2016 Wetland Ratings. Phytoneuron 2016-30: 1-17
Minnesota Climatology Working Group. State Climatology Office - DNR Waters, Extension Climatology
Office - MES and Academic Climatology - U of Minnesota. http://climate.umn.edu/wetland/
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Protected Waters Inventory Map, Hennepin County.
Shaw, S.P., and C.G. Fredine. 1956. Wetlands of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
Circular 39. 67pp.
State of Minnesota Interagency Cooperative Agreement for Implementation of the Federal Wetland
Delineation Memorandum of Agreement. Minnesota Wetland Mapping Conventions for 1985 Food
Security Act (FSA) as Amended and Section 404 Clean Water Act (CWA), August 1994.
United States Army Corps of Engineers- St. Paul District and Minnesota Board of Water & Soil
Resources. March 4, 2015. Guidance for Submittal of Delineation Reports to the St. Paul District Army
Corps of Engineers and Wetland Conservation Act Local Governmental Units in Minnesota.
United States Department of Agriculture. Natural Resources Conservation Service. Climate Analysis for
Wetlands. http://www.wcc.nres.usda.gov/ftqref/support/climate/wetlands/
United States Department of Agriculture. Natural Resources Conservation Service. Web Soil Survey.
http://websoilsurvev.nres.usda.qov/app/
United States Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetland Inventory Map. May 2015 Update (April 30,
2015 metadata), Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
United States Geological Survey. 7.5 minute, 1:24,000 scale Topographic Quadrangle Map.
1760 Shoreline Dr. - Wetland Delineation Report Page 8
ISG Project No. 20712
APPEN DIX A :
Figure 1 . Project Location
Figure 2. DNR Public Waters Inventory and National
Wetland Inventory
Figure 3. Hennepin County Soil Survey
Figure 4. LiDAR Elevations and Hillshade
Figure 5. Aerial Photograph
.� . . . .- . -.. • ..- . �
� . - . �
_ .a4 _ , _
wT 9 .
, J
. � .. � � ,
. .. , . 4.
. a
_ _.._.,_�__
... ��.� _ ;
�� �"�;.��: �< ,_ �
_�;;
� Tanager
£#` � j .,,- . _
�. �.__�,.,, � Orono
-�r- ,��� �
���'�r �� � ;
,; ,.�� �
� � ;� � �� . Hennepin �'
� � -k � � `� �`� � County
� �� � r
� � �= � ,:�� �
. .
• o
,.� . . �;
�
�� �"'t'F8N � �
� �� r
s �231fu- �,,, Hentage
I � =4 E
. �y .-L- '-�)- t � . :
_ 5 , p. . � �
� . �
_� �_LLJ�1�1 � � �. �" � Minnetonka-Lower
-� Lakc
_..—--�---'
f
� 1
,ae� � t e � ___ _ - -_._.__�
.. 1E� �� �� ..e� . � ; . � _.___. . _ �_
'� � ,t` �-�k.,,.�- "� �a �
Orono
12 �
�
��'� ��������9 -� Way�afia ' �y
�
;;. .
� -
�'� s " ..�.��. >"a ��s*�E�.� k��r-i ��e�%����is�y� �.a,�g�� , - .��3� -
�r � a"+w` i,� i �"' I�3 f ``,:� i?`� ` 4;�'}
�� �`" � �., d� �' �„resest��� � 1 ;
� `�� Vts �:r. .�,, ��.� � n� {�a� �
'
; �' � � �,� i'j � � � ,r� �� � ��
y,.. �
3 .���1 � � _� � � « � . �LL ^
i I II
i �I�; . • . _ � t ��
s `
� m
'I' s�, . '. . . .
S
F �
�r f
�7
. 5 �'�e �, h�,� ' ��N� . � . n
� � s � � � ,.y _
.
< : � �
'� � t N°�M �. �� � .. '. . . $.'S
„«
. r ,,�„ a. �' ' . .�,�*d„ �� � i � �
. .. . �„ � .. , ', t+ es-
,. � " 'r- . ��.. �� ,..�-.
�
, �
x �}g` .�� �� � *% �' ��' ,� , {' s�6� �e� -
«. �;
��� "�, � r .�s' ��� � €�''j � ,o
� � `
�- '� � - :�-,.�, �- '�'i- `' ,�r, „.�� . � �,:," ^ � ., egend �
� " , , �,. � . ° �r a c
.,�. �
. ��`�"+�' ��. �r ��«.�.,,, ��,�,�,.. � r�� -'. . . .��.�� � /"`�. � ProjectArea �'
� -
,,. ., . . ,.... �� > M
i° , y , f.� L
� � w - Interstate � �
, . �..� _ � . ;' o
v,
� . f � � . � � � ., _ US Highway `r°
.. . t.;'�.,; .
' _. _ � ' State Highway .�'� `"
n
0
. - . . � ' ....� � � � �Counties '�,��: �
� . Township,Range '���o
, N
= Sections d
' ,+"�s; -�.: �'��.; -.a, � � •►� -. o
o- ....... n
`�t' �.? i � � . � Lakes '�
a s � O
�f � Major Stream
��y� �� � ,� � �
� Municipality .o
�%: �. " � Z All Counties ����S
� . '... ' ��� : __.._ . ,. ,
' � � .� �
��I+►` � � . � ' �-"`��� �"° 1 ,��.. � z,2
_ . _ � _ � �,
r��d�y,��,iy�i �o�i �
� Figure I
� 4°°° &°°° Project Location Map � « ��
Fee' Muricipali�e (M�DO��,2CG5;
����=a,coo n I 760 Shoreline Dr. ��s��rv�����iusc�;
Lakes(M�DNR,200a;
Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota c���t�e��rvr,�Nr�,zo�s;
$'�'�_ � ��.vi p {. °`���-S
��y������;���������� i �' :F F �. r�.
2� ' v`�'.."..^"J ��y,,,.� � �'�-n `� • .
� � �,f 1:.'I 1 � ' �., . \ . � +� vt» ""°''` '�.
F 'm�� ' �� �'�� �y � � �1� � �'�u� ���� �+."'� `�.� �
.� ,;. �'" 4 . 1 I 1
4,mm.Mr� V�1 " 9 ^.
.��� � � 5��� � b�'� *��
�� S � } '}':. x``�����' y _4` � /� W� �� '`��'��.`
..�. 4 ���� �� :.�L M ��� � �'� � @� �;�+��� �M �4 :.
.+')} � � � p� Y �'� � � ���w��`S b � 'T ,q � �` 1
�q, ��1 uF '#:,�,� ` ��' �i'(�yj i� P �"'J� s ��� m�'.' ' �Y� � •+i�!'�v �1���•�• h
���'y� �R �a� a.. ^� .. Y ��1._ ..^ "�j�' ��� �. k�_ �
�i ' ��� ��;� �� � �� � �4��"� A� �~� � ��ti-��� - � ".,��
r
yA
Y '
+ . . Y ..
�. . `.'. `� ��. `�
—� ,i Y + . . `_ . � x„�'v�' ' ` k. � "t- �d .�..
• ' .. �.'� .�r 'r'� A l 4."f� "� '��� - �. 'dSs e .:.� �
>
� 1
:."�.
'a �-. L � t�; �. -�� � ... �� S.
tx <� � ; . � .� : .�� � � '':� �.
� �y�w. Af �i�. � . �� �t i_� p,� �; �, »�.. �� ,y �fw ,
��,_,�.,�,/� ;��iw y , ni ���a� .�� �
,.
.i r�
�wir.iva:�=i ",' s� t,: * ,,+ t ,�+ �,, P"vP'1�- `` . ��
� 1 � 4.�,� ,!� �S� �t � 5��, '� ,`3 'ti$".. N �
1 1 I x1' �.��J � q*¢ � ��.�.� �t�]�m ��a�:� 4,'{ • ',��� .�s f 1.- �+1.� �w,'"•� L,n.
" �Y}F• . 'W,e , � � '�p°-w �"i d' �s & t . ' "}
�*
'4 ti �` q:�t�p `'fi *`�� a;, �'. . .. �-�.
,
� �w`�r,` 1 " . �- . , �� y �.,b� k�_. L � �� �;z�.
'� R�'� .,
``3� ,� � � �.,� sx.,-, .' tT'.�;.
q� � p� -.�1'�`
;B� - �i, � � ' �� � �s �.. �
�} ¢�� ,�. \l� " :,��1��Y y.. ��) .k.�} ,.. �+�. �fr i � ,�[ `Y. . . `�,.. �
I,¢��� 4��.� �� � ty,°* ,M « , �� ♦��+,.. �i_ � ^ ' �
C �!. _ ��* ��y �! � ' . . . ... � ~�;
.� :
, r, ` � � ,
�. ��.� �.. � �
�� , .� �, ��, � ��.;� u�+ ,,,�„"�z� �,� R
��,.� �� ��. � t �� � ����,�, 1
- +�.: � . x.i.T'• �i�i,� �.: "� .
1�111L111A:�J ' . '. .• � �' ..M� . � {� ,':� �ta��-'�_
�:. �� +�- �.,'�► �'�� ��,. „� � '�'"`� . .. .. . � � , ��# -
r � �. .
',�t 'fi`
� , �Jp M1
*�e.;, � - ,�'� , � Y .
r ,��t ���, � rf �
� ��. � � �
� '���� � � �.�
� w �# � ++ � "�'� s� �' °{�� ".� �
:.��� , �� �,�. . . ,-- � � �.�._ �,, .j'.r� �5.,. `s
�4"���{ � � i .. �<F . _ _ ' �l .•5TA=}�,Icy��s.#; y. ,
� i � �„� `.�F I� �E rti w"" '�,
�x. �*� �-� fi�. ' h��'�'
"`� �, � ,�,, �r'SM"
fyp �R� tr � 4'f,: ��,...
' ' �� ,� #.,,.+�.� .. � " . �� � �..
'i. '�� �'r 7Y�' �'�5:.,� ��� � f� � Y. '.,. l.l1 -�LL'-' �-. .
� � 1:.. I I �'i'.
S � �:�� � � � �'& �� an7•4 , .
^f ��T , ��ti . ,:.
� �' 4�y, � '����N , .4�� i ;�.
- p;„ , �4�; x � .�• �� .:' .
'� � 'r�
�.X"f � � � 1 .� �` 4� . - �.��.`"-`'�-s�.�x,�..-'",�_r�':i``' .�:._.
, ,
.
: ." t = P- _
. �; _
, � ..--�-- .,
apt ` ' • '+" � _
* � �.. �.�i� � 'a • t' , - _�� —
. " �. .4��'��' � �''".�`� ��-.'��"`..�
�,.. +�:.. � . � �.: � -
. # a;__
�eqend ' � :�t ,'h' " --
.;K�; T , �;,. �]
�' �Project Area ��.,�,:�
.. �+. •
" — USGS Streams ` �>�".
, �;.
� DNR Public Watercourses �, ,��j>;
� DNR Public Waters Inventory ` � '
:,�rr''�_
" ���+ 'Jational Wetlands Inventory -
�` a Freshwater Emergent Wetland �• � ,�
� ';'.,� ,7� Freshwater Forested/Shrub Wetlur
:_� _,_ ,,. - ,n�. . ,�_., „ . ,.., . _ �.,
. _...� _. .,,.
'x''"" �� Freshwater Pond �
Lake �
�'��•: � o
y� Riverine �'
��
� ,�.
r�.�. I;)".�01% f-rn�Fr!�:u�nhc� 17-?lii'I!
Figure 2
� ,�5 ��o '�� DNR Public Waters Inventory sour�e�s�:
FFe` and National Wetlands Inventor onr,o�r,oto�us�ni nnir,zc��s�
� m=zsc n Y n�wi�nnN�nR,zo��)
1760 ShOCelllle Dt'. NWi(r✓�n unk,�ooa�
Orono, Hennepin County, Minnc;sota
I/�' . . �'rr�`r'_ �+,. '�,.�'>q� �e��..``�'.* ww�''� '"`".'1� �''�"�s: ` � ` a�
k' �� � �
� `n �
4
a.',. .:.�. � 4�"��, n �`�y . . a �;: ,�
s.,�.�� _ _ . ...,�, �r.`„. .. }� '^i., y�1��k�� t t ��+ �
Leqend �'�� ,� ����• � � �����'�;,���.��,��������k'�a,� � .
�
,,� � �w�„�;,s,rr�- -��
� � �Project Area �"���~ ��±�� � � �.� � c .,, �
� ,� ya ,� �j �'�f..��" � �
<� �ennepin County Soil Survey ,� � r A�t Y f F+�.-��� �;� "� .� '* �` � � " r� `".-
t . i.; A�x +��#''",�, y` q'Skn ,
t�,,�*;� Hydric Soil t.� �, . h y �r a�,�t '`,��}� �,s�" ��";��, . ,,#. ; c, ��,�
� l
yu' �._�t � �a, �;.; i � _ s
r *` � Predominantly Hydric Soil ��, �. � `�,,.,,�"�'� ; � '"' �� .�� �,, ����
Partially Hydric Soil � ��: ���� , �'�.��"�' �,�,�,,�°� �''� ''� ,� - - ��`��
y 4
YY * .. �� ?�A-�1' S: Q� -�1
i Predominantly Non-Hydric Soil �`" �; �• "`�i:� ' , � a+�' '�"�'�`��4 � �-�
A R � A `h '1`4�`ti a� ,� ' �, �, �"�y9�u
4{
Non-Hydric Soil �.�,�j� �� k" � ,�`� '�... �,:� �,.�',>. �r�>-*�' , "�'� .. '�Ft
. �� rY - . «� ; �
,. i ^a `� y�.,,� ,yy�� o-n p�:� �k . �
.. c � �'�'..'. s' 4 y �L. � K-,;_¢ �.�'a� z 9$"" .�T'�-"�1 f J�,�''.� '/��- .. � �n k ,
tlnc Raq �� PercMt M �nc At ,� � �„t T�y , o� � Y
� H Cnc 100 6 .?� �ay.` i�#�n :;% aa , &��a� .; J'� a�j g s , ` ,r`
� 'k' v�'��c� � �
Predo-ninale��. H ri� z 67 e a�W 7�! ;�, T�N '
7 Vd �+w .��� ^' t� �: i�,. :.�K �t#'�.,.� ��' ' '.. � f.�t,'�.
� rt a l5 N nr e 33`. 2nC F , -���``,� '� f# �� �,`"�, `• ��� ' � » �''� �^ ; �::
, F; � r�,�� t , �'-� ' --k '� � • ` � , #, , 5�`< �" ,-�ry .
1 I';rli ar. . y��. �� a,m�` �43'.� ��jp.+..�t�" � ��
,,ti�,,,p �� •�� �, �� 9� :�.�i.(f���'�.�:.. �. ��Fi.,.. w^�✓.{ � y�
,lr�.. .��"�,' �+4.�d! + �{ ,� . ,a x �a
b�' K �{ � � r`� � ^ �''�!. �'k �.W_ I �Y,kl�
� y �'S ;t'. �� .����� d���,t�`^' R' � .�� t/', •
.w� 5I` ` i a' r*h,t � �� �� ���
-�� >: '� '�--�.°`: ' .t+�� � �
..
� ,�� �� ,�
;
,,
, a
�� �, ,;� ��� � � `�t` e�>:�►.� � � � ,.�!�'`f�;� y���
' .� � _T 4...��,* ��l�"5�++.
_ H�' ��y,m�''�rB �..y_"'`��. a .� �'A ���^���''�,�. �'� .
.1 . p� _ �� � �� �Y .
. r,
�.� . �li r�aa„� } J }i
.s ;�''�,�m�' �,r�44� �``"�F,�`"�i��„ '��� �y� . �
w, .,� r�f4'j$ ,,:� . . };�` '.:l�*eT.o
�,.. � .•� . . � ���:.
� '�� . ,d�F.... .. �y ,�,,
.
s �
���, r �5` � ��'�` . +�fi . .
�i Y �.s �. � xp :�¢ -.�,� �^ r .♦ #�� -
.ti . ' c ' • -_ , � . .
f i � ,
, �� .
. . . ..
.k �, 4 ��'��� .�. ...,.- i lt �j; �I ,�
,
1
.
. ' i
!, , � � d
.._. , .. f ! »g�.
� .-
.
, • �"
. e ..' a �� y�S� r :: , � w, .._� ;, ,- ;3 �t`
`., . , M �I. � � t-._ l:y: ! ^�. �
,�«.^" 'r �a r �+ ia� ��<y
�y� � ���^°��� ,� � �r,„�"�, � '��y �� +. �
yL'K'- �lp,e�<qK q�"*'! �� 4�°�'"7�� �j� i q r d � r`�} I � � 1 ,.
� ��.._4� �. �`� � I.� ' ����� � � .
i •'
�, ��W+Y'�:.��. �� `�vij e. � �.x. '+� 1y1� Yt� �,]r .. �:�
� ' 'y
/-. '� , I yy. ." u "�� "F . ...j�,_sa��.�' ,�
. � � ..
.�` � - �w:� ` �
.
�,
, . „
> ��
° �'����,�,� , `�:'� ��'�',�� �,-,�� ,. �`��,� � ��:.>�I�as�,�
� , � ,
„y�'" . �1;�I 'tM�' ���`;,"'.+� '�'j ��`r� � - ��
s;, �,,�.�,: �'�"a1`" `"� - „ � '
�`� � � "�`�� `�,. ���`.,� `��°'�.�.� � �
�,gl;- �.. . .,�.�r,$.� : t,� g �� ��,r .s 1
'�. �p.
`��+4f:� �J �,�`�'A�'� 4. h
. �:- ,� �
* � !b.
� � r ��s
�,�, ��"��, ��"�*� ���" � M
� � � �
y� A
�:`�S, . ��a� � *j�.
� Ek '
���r� '�`�I�F� �- ,t.. 4� t -
� ��� ��
��'' .#�'' .�
,,=e,:��,e ,.�/�''
�
�'
r��r,��,�_��;i�; ;�„��,
N Figure 3
� ��� �,� Hennepin County Soil Survey Sou«e�s►:
FeE,. � ortr,opr,otc�usun,NniP,2c�,e�
? n- 250 ft
1760 Shoreline Dr. s���s����v�us�ANRcs,�o�5;
Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota
' � _ �� � .� � ���
�� ...
�, , .
,� ��
� Le end � __ � � ��3
�Project Area � � � o- �
Contours ��'%' � � ° �� �
� e � � i � � / , � �
� � ��� ���'. �� ' ---� � '�J
2 � /^
�-�. .� �, , ��--� —�
% � :�° ' ,
�/ �j� � �
, : _
� , �
� " ; , � _ ���
, �� -.r � �,�,,
�'� ) � — � �.�'�
%� ' � � �a
��" � � �' ; � �'�
;�; ,
;
i � �---�-�. ,F,'__
�' ' � � � � �
, � � �
� . _
_ _-,_______ '�
� � �.
, �
a ; � �,
� � � � � -
� �
� � � �� � �
� �° � ° 0 �
�� o � �
•° � � _ ���.
� �
.
�- -
- .• _�.__ , .
� , _
.:.�;�- �`"
��_ �- �A`,
.,. �
��
.�..
,�--�
.:-�=
.�e �j'
�� �`;
��'' .-/'r/
;�
,/47'�"
��
��
f�iri:�. . _�iF:,. l�l Pio�EcifJumCei 1i-20��1�
� Figure 4
� ��5 �5L LiDAR Elevations and Hillshade SoUr�e,s,:
Fee`, � 2 ft Con`.ou�s(2C91)
1;n= 250 tt ���� ���C���n� �C. 1 N+ete�fiills`r�a:ie(2C1 r)
Orono,Hennepin County, Minnesota
r 1 � �t 'g�.
♦ �;Y S �(�` ���1i� +§"4, 'Z ,, �'��`y,�*��
. {y � `Y',+ v8��.i�, �� i;��"�.''e„`�t!�g� �.
�A � � ��
Le en: � � >: ��-� �� � �,� ° �" �:
��Project Area x'� t�"_ � �n ���, �Y ���y �"` �` "� ��:' � ,
.z �m;� �� '' . `" ;�
� �� `#�„� s,� �¢`+" •-� �v .. . � Y� � ��'"Y ��
,� r�. � t< , �-�� .,, ",� ,. ��;*--, ` �" � �.,�y ��r
'� �k�"� �.'; �.' '. ,� �` 5 . ''�'„r `'�B``k �.p�,� .�" . � � � ..
1 �r�. ,�cµ ���"'+:• �.. .;� ?��. � :r : ,��St".�,� '�� "?� ��"1F
. +� *,� � _t� ,�. � �� + � �' �"�
�X {' 1Ia�..0 'K �
R �� q�,,, f�' �`,� 2 $',��•'f`�, rj� :$ �.�„� ���...k t ���i� i:wM ��,
� ar^- , ,.
r
. , ,
p�` - � . ,rt.'y ir . � �` �.1�'��t ,� V'„ �p£. '�� .
,
F`�' P����.p1fy'• . �.� ,� �� �k�' ,� � . �' ��� �h�"
!� �i��,q,�-.. ! Y. B5' .4'�'` f' E+R�/".'. '} .�-:,
V: � '!�� w� �9 '����f ..� � • { �.• .� ..
� �it2. `"� .�e� .�:� �' .� -��t � } ' �'� � '�.. � - i{�,, �'k
{ y _ .�.,� t1Y �^ 'S,. �'�t�v .. ` !�,. s"�.. .
` ✓ ,�
,,t �gC ��� �I �� ��"„�'�, m`� '1' �ee' �,� � �<� . �i:.
� *°� �� 'y �,..�• '`��r �;�s � ,� �` , ��`..�y`:
��� � �, �j * . R � . .
;.{ i �� ��, , ::.+. }{y�Y, 't` .. �� �
- ` "���k3 4 * n+ . , �
' ;' S f,
Y . ry
,. ..+�; w :<u �„, "�"",_� � �s.�' , • { �;� , i
` A f � �. � k�r> ��:-
x,�r.� 'k � ;� �'€. . ;f r s , x-��e �': .• ' r !
���, ��,. � �:. .� ��:f � �.y.��. r`'�a�`,..
���
� . � �? . � ,�c ` � r ' 3 x � e-
� ku , ,',AF � $ � x" ��n �� ,a;�, y.'7 R " �/... `
�f� �^ . �:� 3� a � � � ,�
, . ,
; : „ � � ` � �
,.. .
�
x sa �,e
� .{ �q ��„ '�,.�F�.. � �r.t �„ ��',� `,� K��, �� _�
g � ��
,�„.� ;�: w.. �� +j!�� � � � !" �'�.
, r
� ° ..a �'," �� � �` ..�. �x`
'�,�` �.�'�•� ��Y�:.. ` �*��� ;. .,_ �� ,.
g,t ::� „ � � � �t P�
�j T. �? L t f . �+ � '�� �." k �.y ���. .
� '�/• ' . .t , P -'� � � i�, q .k��.' ""i
, ti �ii ?'�,,. . {'` _
ic �d , � i3 � Ab,E°�' -� �! f
'r��W! 4+kd, � w� , .. � ; f'^"'�� 41 f,,y�V prY...t t ..r �'S..�."-` t �t
Y � t 1 • �„�` � ,� 1° , � ` ys�''"`��'y���'�°����'�� �
' �� ' � X �. �tr,�• ,�.`� r � � r k .p� �. ,
.
�,':�. � M�,W� .. g-. �{ " • t .7�, .f f� �f� ��,. n� .� � "�.
/ � �' 4 �-/i � � f - I{
� , '�, b ��""_` '.�,tw��,�p �lp t � 5� �� /�/�} fi . � _ �wt
�. M���» �� d�, e�� .�,:��r �`Y ;_�� ry`.��: .
��' �y
_ 7' �:�„��y i � z �n •(! �'..• �Y �'� . . .. �.?' _ - .
� � ��L
.� � 1�y.�• ��'�' :'�� �� ���Y.����4� . ... . ' . � � ':i� ��q� �' , .��
'�.,:. �� e i� � q. �' d ,� � ; . . . ;�'� �
� .. �n . . L �� � -,(�., ,# , + � T-�• , . . � .
0.'a�+ � � !- � � ' '. �P� .
� i� *` �. ��'°�,; `a��` ��� #'�� � f� � ���f."j� dK" � 1;>*'� �' r....�� .
'� .� r. `�
� (:t � .
�
F , -, �. . y=: _ , �1, . ., a a,� ,
� ���.,�� � �� ���� ������ �'" ,_ �.�. ..,d�• .... . � ;� 3. :o",�' '�` �� " . �-a �
.
.
�p,... � � _ � �� `!i�' . i;l� .:�"�; �, ' ` * a` � �M ,g�,
. � ,�
�j 'i � sy;" �'�" i ���/FT.. . '�
!F R F. ' `�.. ;, _ F , e t ;
y� . >
t .E�e .. . ..
p M �
.
�,
��.�'`,� . � .. ��.^ �. �. ���.i "
� £*� '� . � { " �k`
'�.�."�, �1�.
�, j� �n r p,�' ''
� .;r *-, �
.�, � .� �`� T � �. .�
�, 4<` � .
.
�Y.,,'+i �+F /��I,'f` �y'�`
�� " `���' �&,
,� ... �e��.
N Figure 5
� ��� �s� Aerial Photo So��«e,s,:
�--�Fee! � Ortr�op'ioto(I;SUn,�P,ir,20'0)
, ��,_ ZSa„ 1760 Shoreline Dr.
Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota
� � � . �
■
• ' � � � � � � � � � � �
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
� o � � ' ' � • � • � •
1760 Shoreview Dr. - Wetland Delineation Report Appendix B
ISG Project No. 20712
.f;4.rF- ,+A�.
._ .�`��. `' � �
Table 3.Delineated Wetland Size and Type,17605horeline Dr.Orono,MN p . Leaend
WetlandT e • +
Wetland ID Wetland Area Circ.39 fowardin Class. E ers&Reed �* 0�' � ��ProjectArea
LC .'.� � I i� �` . csl I�,ct1Me it�ti Shd:lC flii;n Chiub�,ii Ap�ti'�� � ' WC1�8f1dF�8g
� ^* ."- .�� t �'�'i�� � s , ,�c.. �..�'►A�%k `i q:, ' { ... �,.,n.. '�;...
�`. �� F ��'`� .� �# ',� '�""�,,, � +"�%��c�^� ; t ,;i. `ti . Photo Location
. s
�:�: �,�,��������� ,� � yti � � � .,►�..,� , �""n;�^!'�s'cb,Err �",��t* � " w� ya,�*,.. _ ..
.
i '4"�S.n �� � �.i .,,,,, �'� "„ ti a� ''�.1Yy,.• �•
�{'�°_�'����, 1 f����� ;�..��jr���'�'��"'�ti�� �i µ � a�� � ;amqle Point
�� ,, � �
i� 4 '�' 4� !,/A`.�<�,,ts�r�a;.��j'"� ,�� ' 4 �c � � f,�, E� Upland
r rfff "j��y ,A". y'":rA .`,� r
c+ � �
a a �f 1 . 4*�
� �. �r� Wetland
� ;�� ��ad`�� s y++�� �'��.y �'�_.'�a�.. �rJ•l 10'COfltOuf
� ,`'Y • �!�.= J�' / � ' � . `��'L
� C' i� " r `+ ` +�# �� t �' � 2'Contour
,."����t���,i.�',1'v��Q� "� , � �� �, � 5 ' �^� Wetland Delineation
M°�� t�d ��`���� �� �, � 9 z,' A '� k��q. l JetlandArea
t • .,� �
«-
� ''� � � �; 4, �
� Y��f�A„ �.� �+ �`�� ������ ` y' ,�, Type 2-Fresh(wet)Meadow
Y� � . �. � �; � Type 3-Shallow Marsh
�. � s �� � � �+ w ��'"°. ■ ., � i'��— ,r��
.�f�{ t ��'�:� �"-w „ �ri,... �'n-��in��.rr
;A��/o,}+.������'`rfM I' �t `.`�-' -� [ _ ''�" �.,�a t�'''K�,;.��.�. . . . .
��t,� t 4�' . ^� :ew+�,y .'�y k�LB'. ^ ��
�" � �, . ..� , p+sav' �+[� ,Yi�+
� .f`i �` �'y��L�� � .�- �A�r� ,,y,�,pK �`d „g,.
��dp� �f$�.1�"`+T� _ � � .+.. �,� .' L� ��'-A � _� g. � .
a
. �»" �' -�`.'b ' :,� ,�*�- �y-,y�
�,[ ' �� -�¢��k � � � V ��
,�
�
Q' a '�'i'` � � °'n4.i h �. +a��"� � �:'.;p �����+^� tt�'-'
�" � e{{{yyy��r��� � k'� '�♦ ..� �� �� W� ..s� �._� ... ..
j .�j` � `},y� !.��t� V'u7.i^. ��� .._. �-. � � :
1 i t
F"' � �.�� M�' Y �si9k ., '"�k�� �a.
� �� Y `� 1� . � -T �
� �m �e �v ♦ � �� ��,s�
f � °`
* ' k .a, ..� � <�
� � ' 1 ., p��� � P � k�
1 + ��" .{ �
. : , ''+� e� ¢�,
� � � �4•k �� uHd+" � � �� �4�.
� �f � �� �4� �. ��.. � �I'��-�� � �� . .,,{�...� b �,. '�•�.: � ���e ..
���v . ��} �Y�v `�� . , '�{ � �.�!9 � • i `'. �
.��M .��`�s � � 9. 'F�'�y. ,�'� �^" �7ihr: w'. �'. � �„
�S �� �r �A" ��4��:�F�� ��. s�"' „�yi, ,� �'.��� a �+* a.,
' r
�' � � . � ,. � . f . �
���' �,d S � ♦ ��.�'"'�d'a '-1n .. � � �',""�. � � .., ' �f ��� e
�`. �� � 1 � L .' p: .. #�� i.� Y �
�`3 , rr ,r
'�� .t ��n. �' A. .�pf�. : s w. , /j(9` �r 1�x.� . �-7 -`. fr z
_ ,� ��' �'��, �. ��; �'.'�''n:� �. �`"��' �. �yfq �..�� L >"%I
� � ,
T. „ .. A''�Yi.}ti Fv"`�gy� �. . }�. '(' 1 AL,R _ �_ '�.
�:,,rµ"�'. J�� •,-(r �;;1" .�f, ff�� � .
� d�� t� ,�.- � � �{ ,�,,�{�,�� ��#�� � `'* — � � �/��� ��'� �, x ,;� A
��' o � f .
�"t�'�!R �R�, �' �t �'�,�., as Y 5'r Y ./ f�'t - r/�'jf!��f • v ��r ir�i;a� "pt�;y Y � .
� � ! � •/�'�$�� . � i.l��f. � fy e!' 4�x1f�` . f�r i`'FI. 4 �p''/.
i
s ' g
�'.e�, � 'a ,4 .. � � ..x , . .�i ��.` r it.l�Y"� _�.� �.f�r Y: ' PeC �it �x�,i.�.�t'�,
'r;�� t , �� . �'ra- ���,� r � � .,
/�L. �.. ��`. . �, W F a ..f ,r'}`f� `��� fif
_��,, ��� �y� �" `�,��� g..�, 9!`JF..'t�'�"'t��S . ����'r J�r�'�}�•, �����T"�'���1 r�r �'s' .•�'
���'f4� � �• �'� � ,i+� r ���w� „' 1^ � �,y� Yq+'�r+�;��C�� �.'`f f� ' w�
�-.
�`y�" , f � 4 ��' ��� ;��',�� ,.�'t �^��� .$ t=
�� - � �M � ;.� '�e�� ��� ��"�o� �}������' �� �` tr�,
, ,
f��..w'��" �;� ` �.ff ryir' . '
��1R^ :�i�'. „���� � � � ��;�� -'�S. . f��t� .��� n�`1� ���'/��$ `�
i
t
�, k � ��C , � � �'t x� �. � .
� ��� �:}} + ��� !"'i �w�`� ��'�'''R` ,t;� � y, ��r } � E�.�r{3*�V � F���.
;� y„�'+' , � t�,. ,�¢., ra
' ��` �, � �K`a �'� � *,.�� � ,,• � 8.+ „�'��wF'' a � ,. '[� �+�'"i''• J 1� ���, `„
w t ;
' � 1 '""'C '. t �' t t'Y�f�.. � ��/ ,�is.
f ..� �s � ! . r�J�� �r�i ��''" d ..
� �� � �� " ��. � ri y - . . � � q�" d'�.���j�Q' �` �+►i�Y 1� 'ti '�,j,f. �{�
� � �' � �q � #
e� �, �^t n. f�L�" R'�r�L"".� � :. -� 6 � �. ��� . �.�r
.
.
w _
s.
'.� f .. ,� ���P '4�'4 '�� �,�,� �,� �� t.,*s� �'� �P.�.,��y{'..�.�'t�.. a.�
�
. :
� '�+ l��1R.., �' , �` �v,�,�� � � ` _ ;
� p ,,..� �„p� ' ' �d t t ��; w � r�».- , :�'
�Si �. .� , ..„
� - � `"� �'��''�',r� - ��i� _ I�y, �r-' `.1`"�`�'�` , . }.J .;r�,- � �rw���.�
. ' ,M
� � "+"� t`3� � �a �„ �{1 ��; F54'3y
4t`� i
�, t��� � .'��� � ����A "�, � �� 5��., ,.�/►.'7/R� -.,.�'�"., �
� . •� ,►� •�f' +2+y� �;. ���t� ,�, rz� �n"'^" �
�� ,� ' ` � �� . �, ��t� r �
� �-K, ! y .w�, o� s .a�a .,a-..�• -�+Yrr'" '�
� �.� � � ��� .. .. ,�+'". .a��, �
��x � �
ti�p� �w � . _
,
{y� r `'��4 �•. �",.��:�'"'
._ rP�iie. �Y►�sa. � .�' : .c�°iV`s,r d1�
�'id��� _i�J, �.. ��i �, ..
N Figu re 6
c i5 �,�o s�������;<��;
Wetiand Delineation Map onr.opno�o�usoA,`nAia.2o<s;
Fee: Wet!and Deiineation(ISG,2C1T,
1 in= 150 tt I 760 Shoreline Dr. 2 n co�to�r��20;�>
Orono, Hennepin County, Minnesota
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Midwest Region
ProjecUSite: 1760 Shoreline Dr. City/County: Orono Sampling Date: July 6,17
ApplicanUOwner: Nor-son(Pat Schumacher) State: MN Sampling Point: SP-1-Up
Investigator(s):Lucas Mueller Section,Township,Range: S10,T117N,R23W
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): Head slope Local relief(concave,convex,none):Convex
Slope(%): 3 Lat: 44.957826 Long: 93.567986 Datum: NAD 1983
Soil Map Unit Name: Hamel-Glencoe,depressional,complex 0-3°k slopes NWI classification: None
Are climatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X within a Wetland? Yes No X
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
Above normal precipitation three months prior to the delineation.
VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30'Rad. ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
�• Number of Dominant Species That
2. Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 1 (A)
3• Total Number of Dominant Species
4. Across All Strata: 2 (B)
5• Percent of Dominant Species That
=Total Cover Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 50.0°k (A/B)
Sa�linq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'Rad. )
1. Prevalence Index worksheet:
2. Total%Cover of: Multiply by:
3. OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
4. FACW species 60 x 2= 120
5. FAC species 10 x 3= 30
=Total Cover FACU species 30 x 4= 120
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5'Rad. ) UPL species 0 x 5= 0
1. Phalaris arundinacea 50 Yes FACW Column Totals: 100 (A) 270 (B)
2. Urtica dioica 10 No FACW Prevalence Index =B/A= 2.70
3. Cirsium aivense 20 Yes FACU
4. Asclepias syriaca 10 No FACU Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
5. Poa pratensis 10 No FAC 1-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
6. 2-Dominance Test is>50%
7. 3-Prevalence Index is 53.0'
g. 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
g, data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
10. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation�(Explain)
100 =Total Cover 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30'Rad. ) be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
�' Hydrophytic
2• Vegetation
=Total Cover Present? Yes No X
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region—Version 2.0
SOIL Sampling Point: SP-1-Up
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) °� Color(moist) °k Type� Loc Texture Remarks
0-14 10YR 3/2 100 Loamy/Clayey
14-20 10YR 3/1 95 10YR 5/2 5 D M Loamy/Clayey
20-24 10YR 4/1 90 10YR 5/6 10 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
'Type: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Pore Linin ,M=Matrix.
Hydric Soll Indicators: Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils':
Histosol(A1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
Histic Epipedon(A2) Sandy Redox(S5) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)
Black Histic(A3) Stripped Matrix(S6) Red Parent Material(F21)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Dark Surface(S7) Very Shallow Dark Surtace(F22)
Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) Other(Explain in Remarks)
2 cm Muck(A10) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2)
Depleted Below Dark Surtace(A11) Depleted Matrix(F3)
Thick Dark Surtace(Al2) Redox Dark Surface(F6) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) Depleted Dark Surtace(F7) wetland hydrology must be present,
5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) Redox Depressions(F8) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No X
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primarv Indicators(minimum of one is reauired:check all that a�olvl Secondarv Indicators(minimum of two reauiredl
Surtace Water(A1) Water-Stained Leaves(B9) Surtace Soil Cracks(B6)
High Water Table(A2) Aquatic Fauna(613) Drainage Pattems(B10)
Saturation(A3) True Aquatic Plants(B14) Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
Water Marks(61) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Crayfish Burrows(C8)
Sediment Deposits(62) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Drift Deposits(63) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
Algal Mat or Crust(B4) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) Geomorphic Position(D2)
Iron Deposits(65) Thin Muck Surtace(C7) FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) Gauge or Well Data(D9)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface(B8) Other(Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:
Surface Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Saturation Present? Yes No X Depth(inches): Wetland Hydrology PreaentT Yes No X
(includes capillary fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
Hydrology sampled to 24"below soil surtace.
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region—Version 2.0
WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM—Midwest Region
ProjecUSite: 1760 Shoreline Dr. City/County: Orono Sampling Date: July 6, 17
ApplicanUOwner: Nor-Son(Pat Schumacher) State: MN Sampling Point: SP-2-Wet
Investigator(s):Lucas Mueller Section,Township,Range: S10,T117N,R23W
Landform(hillside,terrace,etc.): Toe Slope Local relief(concave,convex,none):Concave
Slope(%): 1 Lat: 44.957826 Long: 93.567986 Datum: NAD 1983
Soil Map Unit Name: Muskego,blue earth,and Houghton soils„ponded,0-1%slopes NWI classification: PEM1F
Are Gimatic/hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes No X (If no,explain in Remarks.)
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology significantly disturbed? Are"Normal Circumstances"present? Yes X No
Are Vegetation ,Soil ,or Hydrology naturally problematic? (If needed,explain any answers in Remarks.)
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS—Attach site map showing sampling point locations,transects, important features,etc.
Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes X No Is the Sampled Area
Hydric Soil Present? Yes X No withln a Wetland? Yes X No
Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
Above normal precipitation three months prior to the delineation.
VEGETATION—Use scientific names of plants.
Absolute Dominant Indicator
Tree Stratum (Plot size: 30'Rad. ) %Cover Species? Status Dominance Test worksheet:
�• Number of Dominant Species That
2. Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 1 (A)
3• Total Number of Dominant Species
4. Across All Strata: 1 (B)
5• Percent of Dominant Species That
=Total Cover Are OBL,FACW,or FAC: 100.0% (A/B)
Saolinq/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: 15'Rad. )
1. Prevalence Index worksheet:
2. Total°�Cover of: Multiply by:
3. OBL species 0 x 1 = 0
4. FACW species 90 x 2= 180
5. FAC species 0 x 3= 0
=Total Cover FACU species 5 x 4= 20
Herb Stratum (Plot size: 5'Rad. ) UPL species 0 x 5= 0
1. Phalaris arundinacea 80 Yes FACW Column Totals: 95 (A) 200 (B)
2. Urtica dioica 10 No FACW Prevalence Index =B/A= 2.11
3. Cirsium arvense 5 No FACU
4. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators:
5. 1-Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation
6. X 2-Dominance Test is>50%
7. X 3-Prevalence Index is 53.0'
g. 4-Morphological Adaptations'(Provide supporting
g. data in Remarks or on a separate sheet)
10. Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation'(Explain)
95 =Total Cover 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must
Woodv Vine Stratum (Plot size: 30'Rad. ) be present,unless disturbed or problematic.
�� Hydrophytic
2• Vegetation
=Total Cover Present? Yes X No
Remarks: (Include photo numbers here or on a separate sheet.)
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region—Version 2.0
SOIL sampling Point: sP-2-wet
Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.)
Depth Matrix Redox Features
(inches) Color(moist) % Color(moist) % Type' Loc2 Texture Remarks
0-3 10YR 2/1 100 Loamy/Clayey
3-10 10YR 2/1 95 10YR 5/6 5 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
10-22 10YR 4/1 85 10YR 5/6 15 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
22-24 10YR 5/2 90 10YR 5/6 10 C M Loamy/Clayey Prominent redox concentrations
�T pe: C=Concentration,D=Depletion,RM=Reduced Matrix,MS=Masked Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Pore Linin ,M=Matrix.
Hydric Sofi Indicators: Indlcators for Problematic Hydrlc Solls':
Histosol(A1) Sandy Gleyed Matrix(S4) Coast Prairie Redox(A16)
Histic Epipedon(A2) Sandy Redox(S5) Iron-Manganese Masses(F12)
Black Histic(A3) Stripped Matrix(S6) Red Parent Material(F21)
Hydrogen Sulfide(A4) Dark Surtace(S7) Very Shallow Dark Surface(F22)
Stratified Layers(A5) Loamy Mucky Mineral(F1) Other(Explain in Remarks)
2 cm Muck(A10) Loamy Gleyed Matrix(F2)
X Depleted Below Dark Surface(A11) X Depleted Matrix(F3)
Thick Dark Surtace(Al2) X Redox Dark Surtace(F6) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and
Sandy Mucky Mineral(S1) Depleted Dark Surtace(F7) wetland hydrology must be present,
5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat(S3) Redox Depressions(F8) unless disturbed or problematic.
Restrictive Layer(if observed):
Type:
Depth(inches): Hydric Sofl Present? Yes X No
Remarks:
HYDROLOGY
Wetland Hydrology Indicators:
Primarv Indicators(minimum of one is reauired:check all that auolvl Secondarv Indicators(minimum of two reauired)
Surface Water(A1) Water-Stained Leaves(B9) Surface Soil Cracks(66)
X High Water Table(A2) Aquatic Fauna(B13) Drainage Pattems(610)
X Saturation(A3) True Aquatic Plants(B14) Dry-Season Water Table(C2)
Water Marks(B1) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor(C1) Cra�sh Burrows(C8)
Sediment Deposits(62) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots(C3) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery(C9)
Drift Deposits(63) Presence of Reduced Iron(C4) Stunted or Stressed Plants(D1)
Algal Mat or Crust(64) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils(C6) X Geomorphic Position(D2)
Iron Deposits(B5) Thin Muck Surface(C7) X FAC-Neutral Test(D5)
Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery(B7) Gauge or Well Data(D9)
Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surtace(68) Other(Explain in Remarks)
Field Observations:
Surtace Water Present? Yes No X Depth(inches):
Water Table Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 10
Saturation Present? Yes X No Depth(inches): 9 Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes X No
(includes capilla fringe)
Describe Recorded Data(stream gauge,monitoring well,aerial photos,previous inspections),if available:
Remarks:
Hydrology sampled to 24"below soil surface.
US Army Corps of Engineers Midwest Region—Version 2.0
� � � .
� ' ' � � � � • . � � . .
� • • • •
1760 Shoreview Dr. - Wetland Delineation Report Appendix C
ISG Project No. 20712
�",.�.� �„,;�«`'
�7�0 Shoreiine Dr. ' � �`����� �`����
Wetland Delineation
Antecedent Precipitation Data Worksheet
Date: 7/6/2017
Location: Orono, Hennepin County
• • . •
• . • • :• � •
� � • . •
• . • r • •
•
• •
lst Month Prior June 3.20 4.18 5.16 3.43 Normal 2 3 6
2nd Month Prio May 2.68 3.37 4.06 4.84 Wet 3 2 6
3rd Month Prior April 1.96 2.36 2.75 4.04 Wet 3 1 3
Precipitation Data Source:
http://climate.umn.edu/gridded_data/precip/wetland/wetland.asp SUM = 15
*Preliminary Climate Data from Twin Cities station
(http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/climate/historical/lcd.html?loc=msp) Condition Value: Dry = 1
Normal = 2
Wet = 3
Note - If sum is: 6 - 9 = Dry
10 - 14 = Normal
15 - 18 = Wet
1760 Shoreline Dr. - Wetland Delineation Report Appendix C
ISG Project No. 17-20712
Photo Log- 1764 Shoreline Dr.
)uly 6, 2017
s. .�� � - �,� ., -, �� �
J,. y ' ��.�,��,- �� f
�'�.� f_� y4 17f Z`d� iF,c'
.� " `<� ���}�
� �
'� `n��h7- C `-���'3'"
yy.t�'y/C ,1 yYi...
nt �_�e ��� k �
L� �..
i+ w�. �
f' ��e ti r�
t � �`��'�'�. ,t� ;'���.
$� i;�.� ':c�4.'r��� � ?
� - � '.�, '� y 3
t
} ��. .r
{ �' .�r.
;�dr e,
t,,,.... _
- :"�...
.
,.,
. , >,
„ . ..
<
,.___.._..._ .. �.,i.,�.;:, .,...�...�
, _. .. ��..,a. .
„_
.. .,. ._ -m::..a.. ��.,,..�>.a+.r.a.__"'�ar.^""".
..._,._�...,..r,-+q�....
_'tiaws^'r-s , ,...�. ..
�..
�. . ,
�«'
���1 ,.. .., ...r ' � ..: . .
.... "�'*" .
��Y�tx
' ,Ya�l� �
;. ,
��� } � ...,' ��,,.,. ,.
+n}:: �F' .
.,. r .
Photo 1- Viewing properry �ncludmy Lake Minnetonka in the backyround trom the north edge ot
property. Facing south.
�. , ����
�,,' �y�
� �;
1 f !
y t � 'il �I I��
�.� , �1i'� *�� �,�at.,.r�i.rk� 4
'�� :��.. 7,..c..,.�,
p Y �� ; g � � �� _.
�`� ,��#� � �t� �, e � _°
r ''
�r., � �.,�. ,�� � �j �
���� � � � �, � i � � � �
r! r� � ''n! n t}.. 7 • :{ .. ,�y� 9 /�7 t � � ��� . ,� , ' �ry 9 " .�
,�*� u�����r ��. � � r/ 2 �[.�q� � ',;�� � � � .�� e �r �
Sv& �� �{�!y ��� �%.�F �, ,F�� n,� �'y� � �,i t � / ���,V
1 ` ' � �
►� , '" � �, �"�, ,� 'l" 4 , �
�.,s�,y;.;�, '��� � �.al'� � ��°` -�., �1 'r'y �( ai� 'q i� t t i � �� ��; ,
�J(J= t���§a /���`��J���;��y� .},s�,'����`����f + ��a•'�.,'{r y'','�'k i'Yc� �"�'ti ���j� .yti� ���'�.�,���,�° ,�a+q'�1
r� qq t.'A t�g.�YM�.�' ��f '� � r' � +i�-: ,�M �" :�'.� �',.. � 1� .°��\:_ r f �r� � ►
;���.��'t�P'���'''�'.��i �� ��� '���°�h� �a���y��' ,j�4i �t�i �4t�. �3�r . .��#
`��,y �,�i � �}��„�y� ° ��V,3'p�, �'� + ' t� ,�'�"+�� `S•-•_S j�;��'r�•.,_�f .�V1 `����
y'�. �' „� }�,Yf,T� ��,F� :/ r. �t�, r -• y � �.. i �
,.f t l� i. . h� �„�' � � A�" ' M ` �f f 1� �' ���'y��
r �. + '�'� ��` �}�f�1 ��' i
� i�
�i x ��, ,����" " '�� k t� .d f ,r.R
�t i r O' .� ,
���;����TvCs 1� ,�,,u� ,�yt'��� � ��,�•.=.�. �A�`�,�A 'v` �' �,�q(�` � � + i�`�;
�« �+ � ,}� � !'- � {� ¢r
'�':���€��� 51�.i��r�kk�Al'�����3.S��A� i.��, ���\�� 1�:i��i.��
Photo 2- Viewing wetland area on soutfi half of property. Facing south.
1760 Shoreline Dr.- Wetland Delineation Report Appendix C-1
ISG Project No. 17-20712
APPEN DIX D :
Joint Application Form for Activities Affecting Water
Reso u rces i n M i n n esota
Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Application Form
.� . - . . .- . •.. • ..- . .
• . - . �
Project Name and/or Number: 1760 Shoreline Dr.
PART ONE: Applicant Information
If applicant is an entity(company,government entity, partnership,etc.),an authorized contact person must be identified. If the
applicant is using an agent(consultant, lawyer,or other third party)and has authorized them to act on their behalf,the agent's
contact information must also be provided.
Applicant/Landowner Name: Pat Schumacher
Mailing Address: 700 East Lake St.Suite 213, Wayzata, MN 55391
Phone: 952.767.7931
E-mail Address: Pat.schumacher@nor-son.com
Authorized Contact(do not complete if same as above):
Mailing Address:
Phone:
E-mail Address:
Agent Name: Lucas Mueller
Mailing Address: 7900 International Dr. Suite 550 Minneapolis, MN 55357
Phone: 952.426.0699
E-mail Address: Lucas.mueller@is-grp.com
PART TWO: Site Location Information
County: Hennepin City/Township: Orono
Parcel ID and/or Address: 1760 Shoreline Dr.(PID 1011723140017)
Legal Description(Section,Township,Range): S10 T117 R23
Lat/Long(decimal degrees): 44.9594/-93.5681
Attach a map showing the location of the site in relation to local streets,roads,highways.Figure 1,Appendix A
Approximate size of site(acres)or if a linear project,length(feet): 4.02 acres
If you know that your proposal will require an individual Permit from the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers,you must provide the
names and addresses of all property owners adjacent to the project site. This information may be provided by attaching a list to
your application or by using block 25 of the Application for Department of the Army permit which can be obtained at:
http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/Portals/57/docs/regulatory/RegulatorVDocs/en�form 4345 2012oct.pdf
PART THREE: General Project/Site Information
If this application is related to a delineation approval,exemption determination,jurisdictional determination,or other
correspondence submitted prior to this application then describe that here and provide the Corps of Engineers project number.
Describe the project that is being proposed,the project purpose and need,and schedule for implementation and completion.The
project description must fully describe the nature and scope of the proposed activity including a description of all project elements
that effect aquatic resources(wetland, lake,tributary,etc.)and must also include plans and cross section or profile drawings
showing the location,character,and dimensions of all proposed activities and aquatic resource impacts.
Please see attached wetland delineation report for site information and project details.
Project Name and/or Number: 1760 Shorellne Dr.
PART FOUR: Aquatic Resource impactl Summary
If your proposed project involves a direct or indirect impact to an aquatic resource (wetland, lake,tributary, etc.) identify each
impact in the table below.Include all anticipated impacts,including those expected to be temporary.Attach an overhead view map,
aerial photo,and/or drawing showing all of the aquatic resou�ces in the project area and the location(s)of the proposed impacts.
Label each aquatic resource on the map with a reference number or letter and identify the impacts in the following table.
Type of Irripact Duratbn of CouMy,Major
Aquatic Existing Plant
Aquatic Resource (fill,excavate, Impact Overall Si:e of Watershed#,
Resource Type Community
ID(as noted on drain,or Permanent(P) Size of Impactz Aquatic and Bank
overhead view) (Wetland,lake, remove or Temporary Resource 3 Type�s)in Service Area#
tributary etc.) Impact Area°
vegetation) (�1 of Impact Are
llf impacts are temporary;enter the duration of the impacts in days next to the'T", For example,a proJect with a temporary access fill that
would be removed after 220 days wouid be entered"T(220)".
�Impacts less than 0.01 acre should be reported in square feet, Impacts 0.01 acre or greater should be reported as acres and rounded to the
nearest 0.01 acre. Tributary impacts must be reported in linear feet of impact and an area of impact by indicating flrst the Iinear feet of impact
along the flowfine of the stream followed by the area impact in parentheses). For example,a project that impacts 50 feet of a stream that is 6
feet wide would be reported as 50 ft(300 square feet).
}fhis is generelly oniy applicable if you are applying for a de minimis exemption under MN Rules 8420,0420 Subp.8,otherwise enter"N/A".
°Use WeNand Plants and Plont Communiry Types of Minnesoto ond Wisconsln 3`�Ed,as modifled fn MN Rules 8420.0405 Subp.2.
SRefer to Majar Watershed and Bank Service Area maps in MN Rules 8420.0522 Subp.7.
If any of the above identified impacts have already occurred,identify which impacts they are and the cfrcumstances associated
with each:
PART FIVE: Applicant Signature
❑ Check here if you are requesting a pre-aoalication consultation with the Corps and LGU based on the information you have
provided. Regulatory entities will not initiate a formal application review if this box is checked.
By signature below,I attest that the information in this appNcation Is complete and accurate. I further attest that I possess the
authority to undertake the work described herein. �
Signature: Date: ��/Z� /���
I hereby authorize ISG to act on my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to furnish,upon request,
supplemental information in support of thls application. '
1 The term"impact"as used in this joint application form is a generic term used for disclosure purposes to identify
activities that may requlre approval from one or nwre regulatory agencies. For purposes of this form it is not meant to
indicate whether or not those activit(es may require mitigation/replacement.
Project Name and/or Number: 1760 Shoreline Dr.
Attachment A
Request for Delineation Review, Wetland Type Determination, or
Jurisdictional Determination
By submission of the enclosed wetland delineation report, I am requesting that the U.S.Army Corps of Engineers,St. Paul District
(Corps)and/or the Wetland Conservation Act Local Government Unit(LGU) provide me with the following(check all that apply):
�Wetland Type Confirmation
Pa Delineation Concurrence. Concurrence with a delineation is a written notification from the Corps and a decision from the LGU
concurring,not concurring,or commenting on the boundaries of the aquatic resources delineated on the property. Delineation
concurrences are generally valid for five years unless site conditions change. Under this request alone,the Corps will not address
the jurisdictional status of the aquatic resources on the property,only the boundaries of the resources within the review area
(including wetlands,tributaries, lakes,etc.).
❑Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination.A preliminary jurisdictional determination(PJD)is a non-binding written indication
from the Corps that waters,including wetlands, identified on a parcel may be waters of the United States. For purposes of
computation of impacts and compensatory mitigation requirements,a permit decision made on the basis of a PJD will treat all
waters and wetlands in the review area as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. PJDs are advisory in nature and may not be
appealed.
❑Approved Jurisdictional Determination.An approved jurisdictional determination (AJD)is an official Corps determination that
jurisdictional waters of the United States are either present or absent on the property.AJDs can generally be relied upon by the
affected party for five years.An AJD may be appealed through the Corps administrative appeal process.
In order for the Corps and LGU to process your request,the wetland delineation must be prepared in accordance with the 1987
Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual,any approved Regional Supplements to the 1987 Manual,and the Guidelines for
Submitting Wetland Delineations in Minnesota(2013). �
http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/Missions/Re�ulatory/DelineationJDGuidance.aspx
Priniform
WATER RESOURCE PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
Use this form to notify/apply to the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District(MCWD)of a proposed project or work which may fall within
their jurisdiction.Fill out this form completely and submit with your site plan,maps,etc.to the MCWD at:
15320 Minnetonka Blvd.Minnetonka,MN 55345.
Keep a copy for your records.
YOU MUST OBTAIN ALL RE UIRED AUTHORIZATIONS BEFORE BEGINNING WORK.
1. Name of each property owner: �, a rYh �
Mailing Address: 3 L S. City: M;nn �l�S State: �1 N Zip: SS ko 9
Email Address: 'ooa�,�o,,� Phone:f�l tL- Z L� Fax: -�
2. Property Owner Represeatative Information(not required)(licensed contractor,architect, engineer,etc...)
Business Narne: Nor-son, Inc. Representative Name: Pat Schumacher
Business Address: 700 East l.ake Street, Suite 213 City; Wayzata State: MN Zlp; 55391
Email Address: pat.schumacher@nor-son.com Phone: 952-767-7931 F�;
3. Project Address: 1760 Shoreline Drive City: Orono
State: MN Zip: Qtr Section(s): Section(s): �� Township(s): y��N Range(s): 23N►
Lot: Block: Subdivision: pID: 1 01 1 7231 4001 7
4. Size of project parcel(square feet or acres): 4.02 Acres �
Area of disturbance(square feet): TB� Volume of excavation/fill(cubic yards):TBD
Area of existing impervious surface: N�A Area of proposed impervious surface: wA
Length of shoreline affected(feet): N�A Waterbody(&bay if applicable): DNR wetland
5. Type of permit being applied for(Check all that apply);
❑ EROSION CONTROL ❑ WATERBODY CROSSINGS/STRUCTURES
❑ FLOODPLAIN ALTERATION ❑ STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
0 WETLAND PROTECTION ❑ APPROPRIATIONS
❑ DREDGING ❑ ILLICIT DISCHARGE
O SHORELINE/STREAMBANK STABILIZATION
6. Project purpose(Check all that apply):
O SINGLE FAMILY HOME ❑ MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL(apartments)
❑ ROAD CONSTRUCTION O COMMERCIAL or INSTITUTIONAL
❑ UTILITIES ❑ SUBDNISIONS(include number of lots)
❑ DREDGING ❑ LANDSCAPING(pools,berms,etc.)
❑ SHORELINE/STREAMBANK STABILIZATION � OTHER(DESCRIBE):
7.NPDES/SDS General Stormwater Permit Number(if applicable):N/A
8.Waterbody receiving runoff from site:N/A
9. Project Timeline: Start Date: �� Complerion Date:TBD
Permits have been applied for: City �County �MN Pollution Control Agency �DNR �COE �
Permits have been receiv�: City—�County—�MN Pollution Control Agency�DNR�COE—�
By signing below,I hereby request a pernvt to suthorize the activities described herein.I certify that I am familiar with MCWD
Rules and that the proposed activity will be conducted in compliance with these Rules.I am familiar with the information
contained in this application and,to the best of my knowledge and belief,all informarion is true,complete and accurate. I
understand that proceeding with work before all required authorizations are obtained may be subject to federal,state and/or local
admin' ative,civil an or eriminal penalries.
o'�-I zy I z�t�-
Si�na ure of ach Pro rty Owner Date
[t.evise� ?/.15/13 Page 1 t�f 1