HomeMy WebLinkAboutonsite sewage treatment systems _ l�
,:• � � •:;'�
I I� � \i,�
� .. . ,� CI�Y of O1ZOloTO
;, �� ,���'�:,� � �r
�.'t "'�� ''• � ' ` �C„ :�/ Mun9cipal O,ffices
'1\ ��° at �i: �' � �'; .
`: '� ; ' �' �t;�'� G " Street Address: Mailing Address:
��4�E S H p'4��' 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Boz 66
-.-__._.--. Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323•0066
To: The Cunent Owner of Address � 3��a S/� /� C��c_..>dcJ c�
City Ordinance requires that onsite sewage treatment systems in Orono be
inspected on a periodic basis. The onsite sewage treatment system at the above
address has been inspected and the following is known about the system. A
sketch of the known components of the system is available for most properties at
the Orono City Hall.
Imminent Public Health Threat
Yes
No
If yes, please contact the Onsite Systems Manager at 952-249-4626 within 10
days of recei�t of this notice. The septic system must be brought into compliance
within 90 days. Failure to do so will result in referral to the City Attorney for
legal action.
System Identified as Non-Compliant
Yes �No
If yes, system must be brought into compliance by:
December 31, 2007 •
December 31,2010 �
Other
Septic Tank(s) Pump out Needed
Yes �No
The City recommends the septic tank(s) and/or lift taril: be serviced and pumped
out every three years. City records indicate the tank(s) were last pumped out on
5"� - l�� o�' . The tank(s) should be cleaned through the manhole and
not throu�h the inspection pipes, this allows for proper cleaning.
Comments:
`��O��.�A.�G � �
Inspector: Date of Inspection � ,- c�(,�
Telephone (9�2) 2�9-�600 � �'as (9�3) ?=�9-�6i�
K'«'ti4'.Cl.osono.mn.us
=o-��.
� . �
., o �
o�;,
�� �� � � . CITY of ORONO
<.'''`P,�,�.. ,�,� : .
+�l ,,'; . _ , �
'�! �,. �,,ti. ,, �, Municipal Offces
�'� " .1�' `;t�'ti G~ Street Address: �15a-a4q"y6o 0 Mailing Address:
�9kE8H0¢� 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66
Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066
To Current Owner: Address: �3�`U S�.Sd o''`� c) �� a r_
City Ordinance 199 requires that each existing on-site sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected every two yeazs.
T'he on-site sewage treatment system at the above address has been inspected and appears to fall into the categories checked below.
SYSTEM CONFORMITY (1-3): �
1�"CODE SYSTEM"An ISTS which meets all the location,design and construction standards of the current Orono Municipal Code.
2 "COMPLIANT SYSTEM" An LSTS which does not meet all the location,design and construction standards of the current Orono
Municipal Code but does meet the three foot separation requirement or two foot requirement for systems installed 1996 or earlier,and
which is not failiag or an imminent threat to public health or safety.
3 "NON-COMPLIANT SYSTEM" A prohibited ISTS;an ISTS located within a designated 100-yeaz flood plain,any ISTS which may
or may not meet all the location,design,or construction stan�rds of the current Orono Municipal Code and which is failing for any
reason;and any ISTS with less than three feet of unsaturated soil or sand between the distribution device and the limiting soil chuacteristics.
TANK CONDITION(5-7): �
Tank inspection indicates:
5 Pumpout not needed at this time.
�61Septic tanks must be pumped out this year (city code recommends tanks to be pumped out once every 3 years.
���Tank was last pumped ).
Make sure septic tanks are pumped through manhole and not through white inspection pipes. This allows for the proper
cleaning. Keep water softner and iron filter discharee aut of septic svstem to orolons life of drainfeld. Ask aumaer to test
slarm float to verifv alarm is still workine in vour house. The alarm warns owner that seata¢e is about to backup into basement
7 Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. Inspection risers(4"dia.pipe)must be installed in each tank. If
tanks have not been pumped out within the last three years,they should be pumped out now.
DRAINFIELD CONDITION 8-10 : �
8 Drainfield is dry,no surfacing evident.
9 Some evidence of surfacing,not critical yet.
10 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact the City Inspector
immediately. Repairs must be completed within 90 days.
COMMENTS: �b v r� �l o a�5 ��, � J►�-� Sc�3:L �S-�.n�f:j a�tt
��f �r--rF' � �I e�CS .
�:Z��a� ��
Date of Inspection Matt Bolterman - Septic System [nspector
Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisti' the requirements for a inortgage or u[her transfer of propertJ. be advised that this rep�rl docs
nut �uarun�ee or eertit'� that an e�isting s�•stem ���ill continiie to funetion properh•. but is merel� an opinion of th� adequac� of the s�stem un�)rr currcnt
cun�itiun>based on the availab(c inlonnation.
� o� �
O�A\ = O .
������? CITYof �ROliTO �
� 'i �
� ����� �Kr
���i}�jy^';� G'ti biunlc4paI of�ices
'� y:�.};i��'�Y Street Addreu: Mail
��H� 2750 Keliey Parkway jng Addrau;
� Orono, MN 55356� - P•0. Box 66
. • 95d-�4q-y600 � Crystal Bay. MN 55323•006E
To Current Owner: Address: �-3�� S�`SQO�-0 00 1;�f-
�
Ciry Ordinance 199 requires that each existina on-site sewage treatment system in Orono be inspected every two years.
The on-site sewage treatment system at the above address haz been inspected and appears to fall into the categories checked below.
STEM CONFORMITY 1-3 : 1
1 "CODE SYSTEM"An ISTS whieh meets a]I the locadocy daign and construction standards of the current Orono MunIcipal Code.
2 "COMPLIANT SYSTEM" M ISTS which does not meet all the location.daign and consauction sundards of the current Orono bfunicipal
Code 6ut does meet the three foot separation requirement or hro foot rcquirement for systems installed 1996 or earlier.and which is not failing or
:an tmminent threat w public heslth or saYery.
3 "NON-COMPLLANT SYSTEM" A prohibited ISTS;an ISTS located withtn a duignated!00-year flood plain,any ISTS which may
ot may not meet all the location.design,or eonswcdon standards of tJie eurrent Orono Munieipal Code and which is faiiing far any reason;and
any ISTS with less than three feet of unsaturated soil or sand between the distribuuon device and the limiting so�eharactecistics,
TANK CONDITION(_5:7): �
Tanl:inspection indicates: � . �
5 Pumpout not needed at this time. .
6�Septic tanks must be pumped out this eaz (city code requires tanks to be pumped out once every 3 years.
Tank was last pumped_ 1�'�30-�i� �, .
1�Iake sure seatic tanks are pumoed throush manhole and not through�vhite[nsoection oines
Th�s allows for the oroaer cleaning.
7 Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. Insptction risers(4"dia.pipe)must be installed in each tank.
FIELD CONDITION -tQ ; �
8 ninfield is dry,no surfacing evident.
9 Some ovidrnce of surfacing,not critical yet. •
10 Drainfield is saturated and visibly dischuging untreated effluent to the surface. Contact the Ciry Inspector
immediately.Repain must be eompleted within 90 days.
COI�i�NTS: ��u�� 1�c i�.5 ��L_ P��- s c �-� � ��u S �t.-
S �� ccc'� -
�
�—
01 G�c
Date of Inspection Matt Boiterman- Se ac S em I
p� yst nsptctor
Note:in the event that this inspecdon rcpoR i�nsed w satisfy the rcquirements tor a mortYage or othe�oransfer ofprope .ry.be advised that this reFeR does aoc8u=���e
orcertity t,hu an existing system wiil continue W tuncdoa properly.but is mereiy an opinion ofthe adequary ofthe system under eurrentconditIons based on thc a�u13b;
infotmation.
�o�
0 0 ,,.
;;'� ` CITY of ORONO
; . �
,' ,� � 1r�—�' ,, ;
� i, .
� ° ` � Fr Municipal ottices
�t ,�
ti' ;� a
\� `�� �:<,-:i,,: ;`�;`� G~�/ Stroet Addross: MaiNnQ Addrou:
�`��;gg04'� 2150 Kelley Pa�kway P.O. Box 66
Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066
�
July 5, 2000
Ronald&Dawn Rehbein
2320 Shadowood Drive
Long Lake, Mn 55356
Dear Mr. & Mrs. Rehbein :
An inspection of your septic system was conducted on June 28, 2000. A summary of the inspection
is below.
Septic Tank Condition
1. Pumpout not needed at this time.
The septic system is a compliant system, meaning it meets all or most cunent City and State
Standards. Enclosed is a list of licensed contractors who work in Orono on a regulaz basis. This
list is enclosed simply for your reference in case your septic system needs maintenance in the future.
Also enclosed is a fact sheet explaining your septic system and how it functions. Finally, an as-built
drawing is enclosed showing the appro�mate location of the septic system.
If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact me at the City Offices at 249-4600.
Res ectfu , ,
���
Chris Pence
On-Site Systems Manager
Enclosures
In the event this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a mortgage or other transfer of property,
be advised that this report does no guarantee or certify the eaisting system will continue to function properly,but
is merely an opinion of the adequacy of the system under current conditions based on the available information.
This report must be kept on the premises with the system location and pumping records.
Telephone(952)249-4600 • Fax(952)249-4616
www.ci.orono.mn.us
���
O O
y �M =- CITY of ORONO
� '� �l�� .�+
� fy;•,�;`,:��C- n �!4 Municipal Offices
:�-'.f
-� :.•�����'� G
�`�`�����'' Street Addross: Mailina Addroaa:
� � "i ;�� �„'�!i
�ygKO 2150 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66
Orono, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066
i
Owner: Address: 23Z0 3hadowood Dr.
Permit #'s: 6820 Dates: 2/Z4/96 Contractors: J. B. DiQQera
(This is �] an existing system ( ] new construction) .
STEM COMPLIANCE (1-3) : 1
1 Code System: Meets or exceeds current City standards in all respects relating to design,
construction, and location. Appears to be operating properly.
2 Compliant System: Does not meet all current City standards for new construction, but in
most respects appears to be designed, located, and constructed in accordance with previous
codes and is functioning properly.
3 Non-Compliant System: System may or may not meet current City standards for design,
construction, or location, but is failing to properly treat and dispose of the current
input; and any system with less than three feet of vertical separation between the bottom
of the drainfield and the saturated soil level.
(The saturated soil lavel ia (�] or is not [ ] idantifiwd under this septic system. If the
saturstad aoil lavel is aot identified, this classificatioa is subject to revisioa.)
�1NK CONDITION (5-9) : 5
�5 Pumpout not needed at this time.
6 Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they should be pumped out this year.
7 System is discharging to the surface. Tanks must be pumped out within 48 hours.
8 Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. If tanks have not been pumped out
within three years, they should be pumped out and risers installed now.
9 Inspection pipe is located over tank baffle-can not measure solids accumulation. If tanks
have not been pumped out within three years, they should be pumped out now.
10 One or more tanks are cesspools, which means the septic system is non-compliant.
(Tha taaks ars [� or are aot [ ] watwr tiQht or the coadition is ( ] uakaowa. If the tanks
are aot coafirmed to be watertiQht, this classification is subjact to revision.)
INFIELD CONDITION (11-14) : 11
1 Drainfield is dry, no surfacing evident.
Some evidence of surfacing, not critical yet. Repair is not required at this time.
13 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface.
. Contact the City Inspector immediately. Repair must be completed within 90 days.
14 Drainfield extent and condition unknown.
POTENTIAL FOR SYSTEM FAILURE: (system age and condition, soils, etc.) :
CONID4ENTS:
�����
Date of Inspection Se ic System Inspector
Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a
transfer of property, this report does not guarantee that an existing system will continue to
function properly, but indicates the operation of the system under current conditions.
Telephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510
�
o�
o � o
�-�� ��-� CITY of ORONO
,� ���'�r:�-�� �,
�, '��,r�:�`�`� �!� Municipal offices
• �f
� `� G SVeet Address: Mailing Address:
�`q$��,'��`ggOg'� 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66
Orano, MN 55356 Crystal Bay, MN 55323-0066
�j�►�A 1/� r
Owner: /�tJ' �(,pi ���► \ ���� Address: 2320 Shadowood Dr.
Permit #'s: 6820 Dates: 2/24/96 Contractors: J. B. Digyers
(This is [ ] an existing system [� new construction) .
�STEM COMPLIANCE (1-3) : 1
1 Code System: Meets or exceeds current City standards in all respects relating to design,
construction, and location. Appears to be operating properly.
2 Compliant System: Does not meet all current City standards for new construction, but in
most respects appears to be designed, located, and constructed in accordance with previous
codes and is functioning properly.
3 Non-Compliant System: System may or may not meet current City standards for design,
construction, or location, but is failing to properly treat and dispose of the current
input; and any system with less than three feet of vertical separation between the bottom
of the drainfield and the saturated soil level.
(The saturated soil level [� has or [ ] has aot been idaatified at this time. If the
saturated aoil lavel has not been identified, this classification is subject to revision.)
K CONDITION (5-9) : 5
5 Pumpout not needed at this time.
Solids accumulation in tanks indicates they should be pumped out this year.
7 System is discharging to the surface. Tanks must be pumped out within 48 hours.
8 Inspection risers missing-tanks could not be inspected. If tanks have not been pumped out
within three years, they should be pumped out and risers installed now.
9 Inspection pipe is located over tank baffle-can not measure solids accumulation. If tanks
have not been pumped out within three years, they should be pumped out now.
(During the last septic tank Maintenance Pumpout the tanks � ware or [ ] were not confirmed
to be watertiQht by tha licansed pu�in� contractor. If the tanks were not confirmad to be
watertfQht, this classification is subject to ravision.)
�INFIELD CONDITION (11-14) : 11
1 Drainfield is dry, no surfacing evident.
2 Some evidence of surfacing, not critical yet. Repair is not required at this time.
13 Drainfield is saturated and visibly discharging untreated effluent to the surface.
Contact the City Inspector immediately. Repair must be completed within 90 days.
14 Drainfield extent and condition unknown.
POTENTIAL FOR SYSTEM FAILURE: (system age and condition, soils, etc.) :
COMMENTS:
1� ���v��
Date of Inspection Sep ic System Inspector
Note: In the event that this inspection report is used to satisfy the requirements for a
transfer of property, this report does not guarantee that an existing system will continue to
function properly, but indicates the operation of the system under current conditions.
Tetephone (612) 473-7357 • FAX 473-0510
� SEPTIC SYSTEM INFORMATION
STREET ADDRESS ����llAd��� Dl�;,✓2�
LOT BLOCK SUBDIVISION ,�ha��ryt,t�
MONTH AND YEAR TESTING DONE
ITEMS ALREADY COMPLETED � ,�pyi/��
. b �1�G.S �
S,� ��-.
NEED TO COMPLETE BEFORE ISSUING BUILDING PERMIT:
OBORINGS
OPERC TESTS
SYSTEM DESIGN ��'Q� � S� 1'/Q�
( x ) S ITE PLAN
�[�(
O OTHER
OCOMMENTS
DATE THIS SHEET FILED_���1� BY �✓� /��'��" ` -
SUBDIVISION FILE NO.
'`A T�: Jeanne A. Mabusth, Building & Zoning Administrator
From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator
Date: March 30 , 1990
Subject: #1519 Fullerton Properties - Willow Drive/County Rd 6
Sketch Plan - Septic Concerns
I have transferred the soil survey information to a copy of
the proposed plat, and would make the following preliminary
comments for sketch plan review: _.,._ ... __ ..,�,
__ _ .._ _ ..,,
_. .. t
� 1. Soils on the west half of the site are mainly LeSueur `-;
loam, slopes generally 6$ or Iess and water table generally a
' no higher than 3' below the surface. The lots designated as ;'
'' Lots 1 , 2 and 3 , BlockX�and Lots 1 and 2 of Block�2',� have }
, substantial areas of LeSueur loam and probably will find�
suitable sites for mound systems. �''
_ : e...
.... l ._.... _...._._ ....___ ___�..___..._._ _
.__._. .,.. ... ..
2. Lots 3 and 4 , Block ,2' contain areas of Ki lkenny and
Lester clay loam soils which generally are a little heavier
clay soils. Again, these lots would probably require mound
systems and both appear to have some area of acceptable
slopes.
I
3. The existing farmstead in Lot 5 , Block �2' (2225 Sixth
Avenue North) has one 1, 000 gallon pre-cast concrete tank
west of the farm house, and drainfield that is unknown.
Notwithstanding concerns about drainage through the west end
of this lot, there may be suitable expansion sites west of
the house. The higher ground on which most of the buildings
� are located is a Hayden clay loam, often requiring mound
systems due to s low perc rate, with the areas west of the
house appearing to be a Glencoe silty clay loam which often
precludes the use of an system.
I
4. Lots 6 , 7, 8 and 9 of Block� contain substantial areas
of Glencoe soil which often has water table at the surface
during the wet season. Lots 6 and 7 would appear to have a
drainageway from the north bisecting these lots into a front
and rear portion. Lot 6 may have some mound sites on the
fringes of the Glencoe at the front or rear of the lot. Lot
7 will have an extremely difficult time trying to find
drainfield sites that are more than 75' from the designated
wetland area. Lots 8 and 9 are also quite low, containing
mostly wet soils. These two lots might find suitable mound
sites near the road, probably ending up in front yard areas.
Both Lots 8 and 9 have a number of drainage concerns, as
they are the receiving area for overland flows from the
west.
w
Zoning File #1519 - Septic Concerns
March 30, 1990
' Page 2 of 2 0� �j� �
5. Lot lOdhas a little bit of everything, including flat,
wet soi ls, steep s lope soi Is, and high ground to the west.
It may be possible to find sites either just above or just
below the steep sloped Lester clay loam area.
Summary -
The proposed lots in the west half and northern tier of this
proposal probably will have suitable drainfield sites. Lots 6
through 9 are very questionable due to mostly wet soils and
drainageways.
I have compiled the available soils information, topography,
and wetlands map into an overlay drawing for your review. In
proposed Lot 7, the designated wetlands appear to be more
extensive than shown by the surveyor. The same holds true for
Lot 10.
On paper Lots 7, 8 and 9 look pretty questionable. Perhaps
a site inspection will he lp to confirm whether these concerns are
valid.
� - � '-'- -
-*- _
� �
� � �_..,,_ .. . __ __.-
- - � - I �� 6�� , -- - -
_ I� , .,
SC�? ,v a9 s� •i, E
. r l � i
` / � . � / ,� �� �� __-
—
� / • � � � � � � � i / � r r -
_ . _ ' �+ , / / / l /,
/ � � � / � � .1�
� � . �/ / � / � / /
' . � -� � � � � � i
�
/ p- i- � 9� ��°� �ti � p�x� � / /
�' ,5� 3 � ` titi p �" � /
� � o�ti x P-5 / � � �° �. .
; / i ; i � � � / � � i
� % s&2 r� ; � � so �d ' � /
♦� (; , � �
; �s � ! � '; � / /� `p�
1 �
� � N 3c 9�1 � � .00*�res � / / `o,ti
i (/d32. .� � � �
� � jo � P,Z � � ' / /
� � p � / , � �
� � � I �o3oaJ' . � /
� ' � /� � � � :
1 � �
. ` / ` /
.
� � � / .
i� ,
- - - / �\ � / �' so � l C
/ �, .� ti� ,� � :�-s �/l
� 2, o / � � I
/ � � / � / P_ fxi � �-
; . i � � / � � .� .
. � �-�
i � / / / .
: � � � ��. - - � / � .,�
._ � .. � / � /
. � � � 2.o�t,o�c,res �
.i .
` �' \ � nw� , / _ / ,`. / , / . /
� - s...