HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006-P10476 - new septic system _
" PERMIT
CITY OF ORONO Permit Number:
2750 Kelley Parkway- PO Box 66 P10476
Crystal Bay, Minnesota 55323 Permit Type: Se tic
(952) 249-4600 p
Date Issued: 10/30/2006
SITE ADDRESS: 2140 Salem Ct Unit#
Long Lake,MN 55356
PID: 27_118-23-31-0012
DESCRIPTION:
Proposed Use: Residential
Permit Class: General
Se tic Permit Sub-type(s): New Septic System
Permit Type: P
DETAILS:
Approved per resolution#:
Separate permits required:
NOTICES/REMARKS:
FEE SUMMARY: Peimit Fee: $ 100.00 valuation: $ 0.00
State Surcharge Fee: $ 0.50
TOTAL FEE: $ 100.50
APPLICANT: Hayes&Sons Exc. Inc. OWNER: Mr&Mrs Stephen Lindo
263 82nd Street S.E. 2140 Salem Ct
Montrose,MN 55303 Long Lake MN 55356
THE UNDERSIGNED HEREBY REQUESTS PERMISSION TO MAKE THE REAL IMPROVEMENTS SPECIFIED
AND AGREES TO DO ALL WORK IN STRICT COMPLIANCE WITH ALL CITY OF ORONO ORDINANCES AND STATE OF
MINNESOTA BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS.
� �
i � J � � -
//, � , ,J r
'�> >L �!�J�� �--.� � , ./ ,�//�-1� ,
- � /' � �. l/ /�....f�u..-_.I�..���
, �
APPLICANT PERMITEE SIGNATURE ISSUED BY SIGNATURE
Copies: 1-File(Signatures Required), 1-Applicant, 1-Monthly Reports, 1-Assessing,(If Septic, 1-Septic) Page 1
� �/OD. S�
`� �,"` `� I� �� v y��
� i
CITY OF ORONO SEPTIC SYSTEM PERNIIT APPLICATION
Box 66(2750 Kelley Parkway)
Crystal Bay,Mn 55323
JOB STTE ADDRESS � ( ` � �� C'e� �°U r�
Occupancy Type: Residential ✓ Commercill Other
Permit Type: New or Replacement System $100.00 �
Repair Existing System $ 50.00
(Tanks oi•Drainfield)
$0.50 State surcharge added to above fees
* See fee schedule for non-residentill permit fees
Owner's Name:`��� �-1`�o Phone Number:
Nlailing Address: 2 I�{0 5�.Ce►•, (�y�ti�- City:('��o Zip:
Contractor's Name: 4-�r��u d-��s Phone Number: 7� 3- �/75-/�6Z-
Mailing Address: 7 L 3 �2� 5�• 5� City: �o-�f•w.e Zip: 5�363
*** DO NOT NIA.II�PAYMENT`VITH THIS APPLYCATION***
GENERA.L INSTKUCTIONS
1. Applications for septic system permits may be mailed or submitted in person at the City
Offices; however, permits will not be mailed out. The permit must be picked up in person
at the City Offices and work must not begin unless the permit card is on the job site.
2, Permits will be issued only to contractors holdin�a Minnesota Pollution Control
Agency(MPCA) Septic System Installers License.
3. All work must be done in accordance with the approved septic systetn desi?n. Design reports
are not considered approved unless accompanied by the "City of Orono Septic System
Approval" cover sheet signed by the City Inspector.
4. The followin'inspections will be required for all septic systems:
A. Pre-installation site inspection to include inspector, installer, and general contractor.
B. Tank installation prior to covering.
C. Drainfield trench installation prior to covering. For mounds, inspection is required after
rou?h up but prior to sand placement (sand will be jar tested for silt content), and again
during pressure distribution piping installation in the rock bed.
D. Final inspection to verify proper final cover depths and to verify that all pump stations
(where required) components are functional and comply with codes.
5. Individual holding�IPCAInstallers License shall be present durin�all inspections. :�B4-houP•
notice is i•equi�•ed foi� a[I inspections.
v
'�.
NOTE: Applicant must initial all spaces. Fill in all appropriate blanks and check all appropriate
bo s.
1. I have received a copy of the system design including the City of Orono Septic
System Approval Cover Sheet.
� 2. I will be installinQ the followin :
� � p,��w�•�
A. Tanks: � Precas�Concrete Other Manufaeturer
Tank Capacities:��) v�v Qal.c�sr 2) t��o Qal -ex•sf 3) lna� �al
r�cQc� (3 oO I i� s-4�.t�o�
B. Pump Station (if required)
Pump make&model �t,•��� (.UC6�512�I ? (attach pump curve&
literature); system design requires S� gpm at�'�feet of head.
Hi�h water alarm make&model ��C�.W►- . Outside
electrical work to be completed by installer electrician other.
C. Treatment System:
Trenches: s.f. tl' Mound 2 _ /o'x 3 Z�
Depth of rock below pipe " Rock bed dimensions ' x '
Drop Boxes Sand bed dimensions��r ' x S'Z ' .
Distribution Box Pressure Dist. Pipe Diam. /i�- "
Manifold Pipe Diam. Z "
D. Final Cover/Topsoil to be: borrowed from site
(show location on site plan)
���— trucked in
The undersigned hereby applies to the City of Orono for issuance of a septic system installation permit,
agrees to do all work in strict accordance with ordinances of the City and the regulations of the State
of Nlinnesota,and certifies that all statements made on this application are complete,true and correct.
S ignature of Applicant .L Date: l d �2° " � �
MPCA License No. ���
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
�Staff Review: Appa�oval Den�ai
�
Reviewer: Date: � (7 `� � � ��
Reason for Denial:
�
.
Rusty Olson's--Soil and Percolation
RECEIi/E�
Testing
AU G 0 2� 2006
Joseph J. Olson--MPCA License#810 CITY OF OROt�O
11481 Riverview Rd. NE, Hanover, MN 55341
(763) 498-8779 Fax (763) 498-8290
August O1,2006
Steve Lindo
2140 Salem Court
Orono,Hennepin County
This on-site Sewage Treatment System is designed for a Type i,Five-bedroom home in accordance with the Minnesota
Pollution Control Agency Chapter 7080 and local ordinances.
The seasonally saturated soils were located at 18"-26"(mottled soil). Due to seasonally saturated soils,a pressurized
Mound System will need to be installed to treat septic ef�luent. The bottom ofthe treatment area most be located at
least 3'above the saturated soils.Due to limited space.The mound rockbed must be split into two rock beds.The
proposed rockbed are to be 32 Feet in length.
This svstem is designed with duel rockbed using unlevel pressure distribution.See desien sheets.Use 7/32 inch
perforations on the Iaterals.
The supply line must be insulated under the driveway.
The absorption area of the proposed system does not overlap and is greater than 10 feet from the property line.
The soils at a depth of 12"have a percolation rate averaging 6 MPI.
All neighboring wells are located greater than 100'away from proposed treatment area.
The existing lift station must be turned into a septic tank and a new 1250 gallon lift station must be installed.
A pumping chamber will need to be installed to lift the ei�luent to the treatment area. The power supply and switches
must be located outside the manhole and pumping chamber in a weatherproof enclosure. A warning device must be
installed with light and sound devices;this is in case of a pump failure.The manifold and supply line must have back
drainage to the pumping chamber. The distribution pipes shall have their ends capped. Be sure the rock and sand fill
materials are clean. The sod layer below the entire mounded area must be turned over,just break up the sod and be
sure not to over work.
Keep all heavy equipment off of the proposed treatment areas before,during and after construction. The area
around both sites must be fenced off by the contractor before any construction begins.This Design is not valid
and the System will need to be relocated if failure to protect the areas proposed for On-Site Sewage Treatment
occurs.
With proper installation and maintenance,this system should have no problem in treating scptic effluent effectively.
Nothing other than gray water,(laundry,showers,etc.) Human water and toilet tissue should be disposed of into the
septic tanks. (iarbage disposals are not recommended. Additives must not be used;they may cause hannful damage to
your septic system. It is recommended that you pump the tank every year for 1 tank every two years for two tanks.
Sincerely,
�".!�"Y��P flRONn
��' L�N tt�V�F,Wn
Joseph J.Olson jj1T �.(��
DA �: ` `� - �i� ��MIT Nn —______.....,
� 1�tt�rr�r�
I��:�ifYa*�5 n����rr•.n
� �:< � „.SLh�1i'I
��'�������11� �. ,�.. .!!11���)l'(}�
in fult c�ep� �{e ��dc.
i',��quirement�i�►C ��ti� ,rcritlw.
5t:1:P THIS PLAI� ��AL.
.
' . i
��� ��
2 t ��
. D-i��
i Es"
� m
. `�---�s S � � "�
v� �''v. ' �-''� � �
6 • \ -
� � �
� - e.;
� � ��
' C
�
A
f x' �
�s
�-��r �
� • o
��
��
.
�x
�`
�
, �
� � $
� y o
� ; �
�
� / � � �-
r
rr, / �+' -�
a
�` � .F.
L/ � __
� �
. / •i �
� —
� Y_
� / �,�` � � -.
P � a � _
-C w x+
' c
/ � _
/ ..�
l
i
� .
/ �;�°Q
� .
�� _ �
�.ffi� �l� .
�'� � � r
�� � � �
�.� _� .
�� � ,.. � � -.
�. _ � � . .
� �� „_
` � � ��� .
�� { � ,
_
�� ; � � ' •
_ �
� ' �•
� !t � � �� .
�� � ��
� 1
� .� � � � .
_ � s � s
� ��; �; - - .
��` r�� � l�� .
�� � �� .
� � �v
�� � � � '" ---
�� . � r
� �� �� � � �
� � M F a� � -
Y � � � F �
� � c
� � • �� .l ' . *
. � �, � C � •� �
� �
m, � � �. �
��I�1�,� �, - �
z sl` � � �
� �� • _
�
�.r � � � �° -
A + 4 � � � � � � x W
r�- � � � � ~ �
� �' .� �� �'� J ' ' . r
� � J
c'��, � '� .��� . y �� Y � � . � G
ov � � .
l � . �
• D
n �� � ► .
�W i
~ �- L .
� �� _
. �� � � � � '
� g �' � sc, !
� � ~ �� . � �� ;� �
� � �s � �, - - �
� � � � � . � � a, _
-, � � °
R� � � � �'' s
r � � • � ;
• � �� � G
c �� � �
� � _
�� �
� J
� � � . � s
� � . �
�:�� � � � . � .
.
:� � �� _ .
� �
.
. . : � .
� � - � ��� � � � :
� '
�
� i� � � .�
�� - .
� �� �� � -
d� � � � �, N - -
�.��.�.- ,� � � �
� _� _ �
• ���� � g ` _ .
. � � � � �l�r�rr W
� . ., . . . . �
� : �i�i r �r�r� �
� � � .
m . '� . .
'a�w s � rodcbed#1 Job#�
Tw�wTMe�rt
r��
Universi of Minnesota Mound Design Worksheet
Greaterthan 1%Slopes
a F�ow
Estimated ; 750 9Pd(see figwe A-1�
or measured I x 1.5(safety factqr)= 0 gpd
B. SEP'TIC TANK LIQUID VOLUMES
Se�tank�paary 225p gallons(see figwe G1)
Nurnber of t�ksloompartrnents 0
Effluent Filter (yeslno) yes
G1 Saplic Tank Capadty in Galbns
Number ofi Minimum Capadty with Capacity with
Beckooms Capaary G�b.Disp. Disp.and Lift
2 or less 1125
3 or 4 1500
5 or 6 2250
7,8 or 9 3000
C. SO�S(Site evaluation data)
1. De�h to restricting layer= 1.5 feet
2. DepRh d per�daUon tests= 12 inches
3. Texlure day lo�n
4. Soil loading ra6e(see F'gure D-33) 0.45 9P��
Perodabon rate 6 MPI
5. %Land Sbpe 3.0 %
D. ROCK LAYER DqYffNS10NS
1. Multiply average design flo�r(A)by 0.83 to obt�n required area of rodc layer.Item A x 0.83=
750 gpd x 0.83 ft/gpd= 630 ftZ
2. Determine rock layer width =0.83 ft`lgpd x Linear Loading Rate(LLR)(see LLR chart
0.83 ftZ/gpd x 12.00 = 10.0 ft
LLR Chart
Pe�lc Rate LLR
<120 MPt <=12
>=120 MPI <=6
3. Length of rodc layer=area divided by width=
630.0 ft/ 10.0 feet= 32.0 ft
E. ROCK VOLUME
1. Mul6ply rodc area by rock depth to get cubic feet of rock
630.0 X 1.0 ft= 630.0 ft3
2. Divide ft3 by 27 ft3/yd3 to get cubic yards
630.0 ft3 / 27 = 23.3 yd3
3. Mufliply cubic yards by 1.4 to get weight of rodc in tons;
23.3 yd3 X 1.4 ton/yd3 = 32.7 tons
Page 1 of 5
, F. ABSORPTION WIDTH Absorption ratio: � 2.67
- 1. Absorption width equals absaption ratio times rodc layer width
2.67 x 10.0 ft = 27.0 ft
G. MOUND SLOPE WIDTH b LENGTH(GreaEer than 1%)
1. Dovmslope absaption width=absaption width minus rodc layer width
27.0 feet - 10.0 feet= 17.0 ft
2. Calculate mound size ' �
i I I
UPSLOPE
a.Depth of dear►sand at upslope edge of rodc layer=3 feet minus dist�ce to�esUicting layer(C1)
3.0 ft - 1.5 ft= 1.5 ft
b.Mound height at the upslope edge of rock layer=depth of clean sand for separation(G2a)
at upslope edge plus depth of rodc layer(1 foot)to depth of cover(1 foot)
1.5 ft+1ft+1 ft= 3.5 ft
c.U�lope berm multiplier based on land slope(see figure D-34J
Selected berm mu�iplier: 2.75
d.Upslope width=bemi multiplier(G2c)times upslope mound height(G2b):
2.75 x 3.5 ft = 10.0 ft
DOWNSLOPE
e.Drop in devaation=rock layer width(D2)times percent landslope(C5)/100
10.0 ft x 3.0 % /100= 0.3 ft
f.Do�wr�slope mound height=depth of de�sand for slope diffe�nce(G2e)
at downsbpe nodc edge plus the mound height at the u�lope edge of nodc layer(2b)
0.3 ft + 3.5 ft= 3.8 ft
g.Downslope berm multi�ier based on percent land slope(see F'�gure D-34
Seleded be�m multiplier:
h.Dormslope width=downslope multiplier(G2g)times downslope mound height(G2�
0.00 x 3.8 = 0.0 ft
i.Select greater of G1 and G2h as the downslope width 17.0 ft
j.Tot�mound width is the sum of upslope(G2d)width plus rodc layer width(D2)plus doMmsbpe width(G2i)
10.0 ft+ 10.0 ft+ 17.0 ft= 37.0 ft
k.Total rr�nd length is the sum of upslope width(G2d)plus rock layer length(D3)plus upslope width(G2d)
10.0 ft + 32.0 ft+ 10.0 ft= 52.0 ft
Final Dimensions slope>1%) 37.0 ft x 52.0 ft
I hereby ' that all work has been completed in accordance with all applic�ble ordin�oes,rules&laws.
(signature) 810 pic�se#) 811I2006(date)
Page 2 of 5
-a��r�w,.s � rodcbed#2 Job#�
Tw�wTrn�rr
r�eosww�r
Universi of Minnesota Mound Design Worksheet
Greater than 196 Slopes
a F�ow
Estimated ; 750 9pd(see figure A-1),'
or measured I x 1.5(safety factof)= 0 9Pd
B. SEPTIC TANK LIQUID VOLUMES
��k��y �p gallons(see figure G1)
Number of tanksloompartments 0
Effluent FRer (Yes/no) ye.s
C-1 Septic Tank Cap�dty in Galbns
Number of Minimum Capacity with Capaaty with
Bedroort�s Capaaty Garb.Disp. Disp.and Lift
2 or less 11 5
3 a 4 1500
5 or 6 2250
7,8 or 9 3000
C. SOILS(Site evaluatior►data)
1. Depth to reshiding layer- 1.5 feet
2. D�th of peroolation tests= 12 inches
3. Texture clay loam
4. Sal lo�ng rate(see Figure D-33) 0.45 9Pd��
Pe�ol�ion rate 6 MPI
5. %Land Sbpe 4.0 %
D. ROCK LAYER DIMENSIONS
1. Multiply average design flow(A)by 0.83 to�tain required area of rodc layer:Item A x 0.83=
750 gpd x 0.83 ft/gpd= 630 ft
2. Detertnine rodc layer width =0.83 ft`/gpd x Linear Loading Rate(LLR)(see LLR chart
0.83 fl�/gpd x 12.00 = 10.0 ft
LLR Chart
Perk Rate LLR
<120 MPI <=12
>=120 MPI <=6
3. Length of rodc layer=area divided by width=
630.0 ft2 / 10.0 feet= 32.0 ft
E. ROCK VOLUME
1. Multiply rodc area by rodc depth to get cubic feet of rodc
630.0 X 1.0 ft= 630.0 ft3
2. Divide ft3 by 27 ft3/yd3 to get cubic yards
630.0 ft3 I 27 = 23.3 yd3
3. Mulfiply cubic yards by 1.4 to get weight of rock in tons;
23.3 yd3 X 1.4 ton/yd3 = 32.7 tons
Page 1 of 5
, F. ABSORPTION WIDTH Absorptlon ratio: � 2.67 �
' 1. Absorption width equals absorption ratio tirt�es rodc layer width
2.67 x 10.0 ft = 27.0 ft
G. MOUND SLOPE YYIDTH b LENGTH(Greaber than 196)
1. Downslope absaption width=absorption width minus rock layer width
27.0 feet - 10.0 feet= 17.0 ft
2. Calculate mound size � �
UPSLOPE
a.Dep�d dean s�d at upslope edge of rodc layer=3 feet minus distance to resUicting layer(C1)
3.0 ft - 1.5 ft= 1.5 ft
b.Mound height at the upslope edge of rock layer=depth of dean sand for separation(G2a)
at upsl�e edge plus depth of rodc layer(1 foot)to depth of cover(1 foot)
1.5 ft+1ft+1 ft= 3.5 ft
c.Upslope berm mu�iplier based on land slope(see figure D-34)
Selected berm multiplier:
d.Upslope width=bem�multiplier(G2c)times upslope mound height(G2b):
0.00 x 3.5 ft = ft
DOWNSLOPE
e.Drop in elevation=rock layer width(D2)tirnes percent landslope(C5)/100
10.0 ft x 4.0 96 I 100= 0.4 ft
f.Downslope rnound heiyht=depih af dean sand for slope difference(G2e)
at downslope rock edge plus the mound height at the upslope edge of rodc layer(2b)
0.4 ft + 3.5 ft= 3.9 ft
g.Downslope berm mul6plier based on percent land slope(see Figwe D-34
Selected bertn muttiplier: 4.76
h.Da�msl�e width=downslope multiplier(G2g)times downslope mound height(G2�
4.76 x 3.9 = 18.0 ft
i.Seled greater of G1 and G2h as the downslope width � 18.0 ft
j.Tot�mound width is the sum of upslope(G2d)width plus rodc layer width(D2)plus dormslope width(G2i)
0.0 ft+ 10.0 ft+ 18.0 ft= 28.0 ft
k.Total mound length is the sum of upslope width(G2d)plus rock layer length(D3)plus upslope width(G2d)
10.0 ft + 32.0 ft+ 10.0 ft= 52.0 ft
Final Dimensions (slope>196) 28.0 ft x 52.0 ft
I hereby ' that all wak has been c�mpleted in acoordance with all applicable ordinances,�ules&laws.
(signature) 810(license#) 8I112006(date)
Page 2 of 5
' - Unlevel Pressure Distribution System Design - 10/25/04
1. Lay out system in order of highest to lowest elevation
Line 1 Elevation 111.2 ft Length 92 ft
Line 2 Elevation 110.2 ft Length 92 ft
Line 3 Elevation ft Length ft
�-
Linei 4 Elevation ft Length ft
Line� 5 Elevation ft Length � ft
2. Change in Elevation over the Trenches
Highest elevation-lowest elevation: 111.2 - 110.2 = 1.0 feet
3. Total Head=head at orifices(2ft)+change in elevation(2) 2 ft + 1.0 ft = 3.0 feet
(if greater than 5 feet modify design)
4. Calculate pressure head for each system
1. Highest Trench Elevafion the Head=2 feet
2. Po+ (E1 -Ex)=DEx
Line 1 Elevation 111.2 2+ [E1 -E1]=2+ [ 111.2 - 111.2 ] = 2.0 feet
Line 2 Elevation 110.2 2+[E1 -E2]=2+ [ 111.2 - 110.2 ] = 3.0 feet
Line 3 Elevation 0.0 2+ [E1 -E3]=2+ [ 111.2 - 0.0 ]= 0.0 feet
Line 4 Elevation 0.0 2+[E1 -E4]=2 +[ 111.2 - 0.0 ]= 0.0 feet
Line 5 Elevation 0.0 2+[E1 -E5j=2 + [ 111.2 - 0.0 ] = 0.0 feet
5. Determine flow rate per hole(See figure E-6)
Line 1 Pres 2.0 Perf Diameter 7/32 = 0.80 gpm
Line 2 Pres 3.0 Perf Diameter 7/32 = 0.98 gpm
Line 3 Pres 0.0 Perf Diameter = gpm
Line 4 Pres 0.0 Pert Diameter = gpm
Line 5 Pres 0.0 Perf Diameter = gpm
6. Calculate flow for Line 1
Number of perForations= len th of pipe-2)/spacing]+1
[( 92 ft-2ft) / 3 ft]+1 = 31 pertorations(Check figure E-4 to make sure it is ok)
Flow= number of perforations x flow rate
31 perf x 0.80 gpm = 24.8 gpm
7. Calculate the gallons per foot for Line 1
Gallons/length= 24.8 gpm / 92 ft= 0.27 gpm/ft
E�Perforation Discha e in GPM E-d Maximum Number of 1/4 inch pertorations
Pressure r lateral to uarantee<10°k discha e variation
Head Perforation Diameter in inches Perforation
feet 1/8 3/16 7/32 1/4 Spacing
1 0.18 0.42 0.56 0.74 feet 1 inch 1.25 incl 1.5 inch 2.0 inch
1.5 0.22 0.51 0.68 0.90 2.5 8 14 18 28
2 0.26 0.59 0.80 1.04 3.0 8 13 17 26
2.5 0.29 0.65 0.88 1.17 3.3 7 12 16 25
3 0.32 0.72 0.98 1.28 4.0 7 11 15 23
4 0.37 0.83 1.13 1.47 5.0 6 10 14 22
5 0.41 0.94 1.26 1.65 Page 1 of 2
� - 8. Balance flows for other lengths,spacing,or size
Line 2 GPM=length of pipe x gallons per minute per foot(7)
92 ft x 0.27 gpm/ft = 24.8 gpm
#of Perfs=GPM /flow rate(5.2)
24.8 gpm / 0.98 gpm = 25 #of Perfs (Check figure E-4)
Spacing=(Length-2 feet)/(Number of perts-1)
( 92 ft-2ft)/( 25 perfs- 1)= 3.8 feet
i -
Line 3 GPM=length of pipe x gallons per minute per foot(7) i
0.0 ft x 0.27 gpm/ft = 0.0
#of Perfs= GPM /flow rate(5.2)
0.00 gpm / 0.00 gpm = 0 #of Perfs (Check figure E-4)
Spacing=(Length-2 feet)/(Number of perfs-1)
( 0.0 ft-2ft)/( 0 perfs- 1) = 0.0 feet
Line 4 GPM=length of pipe x gallons per minute per foot(7)
0 ft x 0.27 gpm/ft = 0.0
#of Perfs=GPM /flow rate(5.2)
0 gpm / 0.00 gpm= 0 #of PerFs (Check figure E-4)
Spacing=(Length-2 feet)/(Number of perfs-1)
( 0 ft-2ft)/( 0 perfs- 1)= 0.0 feet E-20 Volume of L' uid in Pi
Pipe Diamefier Liquid per foot
Line 5 GPM=length of pipe x gallons per minute per foot(7) inches allons
0 ft x 0.27 gpm/ft = 0.0 1 0.045
#of Perfs=GPM /flow rate(5.2) 1.25 0.078
0 gpm / 0.00 gpm= 0 #of PerFs 1.5 0.11
Spacing=(Length-2 feet)/(Number of perfs-1) 2 0.17
( 0 ft-2ft)/( 0 perfs- 1)= 0.0 feet 2.5 0.25
3 0.38
9. Calculate total gpm&Ca�ulate System loading 4 0.66
Pi volume(see figune E 20) x length
Line 1 Flow= 24.8 gpm 0.11 gal/ft x 92 ft = 10.1 gal
Line 2 Flow= 24.8 gpm 0.11 gal/ft x 92 ft = 10.1 gal
Line 3 Flow= 0.0 gpm gal/ft x 0 ft = 0.0 gal
Line 4 Flow= 0.0 gpm gal!ft x 0 ft = 0.0 gal
Line 5 Flow= 0.0 gpm gal/ft x 0 ft = 0.0 gal
Tota1= 49.6 gpm Total= 20.2 gal
10. Summary
Pi e Size Perf Size Spacing
Line 1 1.5 in 7/32 in 3.0 ft
Line 2 1.5 in 7/32 in 3.8 ft
Line 3 in 0.00 in 0.0 ft
Line 4 in 0.00 in 0.0 ft
Line 5 in 0.00 in 0.0 ft
I hereby certify lhat I have oompleted this work in accordance with all applicable ordinances,rules and laws
/ / (signature) �/G' (license#) 8/1/2006 (Date)
Page 2 of 2
' - University of Minnesota Pump Selection Procedure - 10125/04
All boxed�ctangles must be entered,the rest will be calculated.
OMs�,�e
1. Determine pumP capacity: T��,,.t
A. Gravity Distribution P"�"""'
1.Minimum required discharge is 10 gpm
2.Ma�dmum suggested discharge is 45 gpm
j For other establishments at least 10%greater than the water j j
supply rate,but no faster than the rate at which efAuent will flow
out of the distribution device.
B. Pressure Distribution-see pressure desiyn worlcsheet �ou t`�t"�"T SY�re`T'
&poinf of discharge
7:ki7i6t7 F131f.E1
Selected Pump Capacity: �gpm rorai�pe
leng
2A.etevatlon
2. Det�mine Total Dynamic Head(TDH) inlet diiference
Wpe ;: --- - - - '
A Elevation differerx�beM�een pump and point of discharge. ' `
,
Ft.................... .. 1
25 feet '• --------------------------- ------
B. Special head requirement?(See Figure-Special Head Requirements)
�5 feet Special Head Requiremenis
Gravity Distribution Oft
C. Fricbon loss in supply pipe Pressure Distribution 5ft
1. Select pipe diameter �2 in
2. En�Fgure E-9 wiTh gpm(1A or B)and pipe diameter(C1)
Read fiic1i�on loss in fcet 100 feet from Figure E-9 E-9 Friction Loss in Plastic Pipe
c n
Friction bss= 3.99 �/100 ft of pipe r 100 ft
nominal
3.Determine total pipe length from pump discharge to soil system discharge point. Flow Rate i e diameter
Estimate by adding 25 percent to pipe lengfh for friction bss in fittings. 1.5° 2.0" 3'
Pi times 1.25=equivalent pipe length
275 ft x 1.25= 343.75 feet 25 . 3.73 1.11 0.16 ,
s �: _
4.Cak,ulate total friction loss by multiplying friction loss(C2) 35 6.96 2.06 0.3
by tt�e equivalent pipe length(C3)and divide by 100. �k =��'�`_,.., ', , . ' �'
Friction Loss= 3.99 ff/100ft X 343.75 ft / 100= 13.7 feet 45 11.07 3.28 0.48
�� �.��� '-��` � _�..
D. Total head requirement is the sum of elevabon difference(A),special 55 4.76 0.7
head requirements(B),and total fiction Ioss(C4). � �,;� . � �.��'°�
25 R + 5 ft + 14.0 ft �{65 6.48 0.95
:t"��u.'9 :��_ s {6 }� 1
+� Y 4 � G
Total Head: 44.0 feet
3. Pump Selection
1.A pump must be selected to deliver at least 50 gpm(1A or B)
with at least 44.0 feet of total head(2D .
I hereby certify that I have completed this work in accordance with all applicable ordinances,rules and laws.
(signature) 810 (license#) 8/1/2006 Date
Page 1 of 1
Los�s of Soil Bo�insts
License#810'
Location or�roject: 2140 Salem Court �
Borings made by: Rusty Olson's Soil and Perc testing 7/31/2006
Classification System: AASHO ; USDS-USDS-SCS X ; Unified ; Othe�
Auger used(check two�: Hand_X ,or Power , Flight, Bucket or Probe_X_
Boring Number_1_Surtace elevation_108.9_ Mottled Soil at_1.5_feet
0"-6" Dark brown loam 10yr3/2 H20 present at_X_
6"-18"Brown clay loam 10yr4/4
18"-24" Rusty brown clay loam 10yr5/4
24"-30"Rusty brown clay loam to loam 10yr5/4
Boring Number 2_Surface elevation_108.9_ Mottled Soil at 1.5_feet
0-8"Dark brown loam 10yr3/2 H20 present at X_
8"-18" Brown clay loam 10yr4/4
18"-30"Rusty brown clay loam 10yr5/4
Boring Number_3_Surfaoe Elevation_107.9_ Mottled Soil at 2.1_feet
0-18"Dark brown loam 10yr3/2 H20 present at X
18"-26"Brown Gay loam 10yr4/4
26"-30"Rusty brown clay loam 10yr5/4
Boring Number 4_ Surtace eleva6on_107.9_ Mottled Soil at_1.5_feet
0�"Daric brown loam 10yr3/2 H20 present at_X
6"-18"Brown clay loam 10yr4/4
18"-24"Rusty brown clay loam 10yr5/4
24"-30" Rusty brown clay loam to loam 10yr5/4
Percolation Test Data Sheet
Lic.#810
� �
Percolating test readings made by: Rusty Olson's Perc. starting at 9:38 A.M. On 08/01/06
Location: 2140 Salem Court
Hole number: 1
Date hole was prepared:7/31//06
Depth of hole bottom_12"_inches, Diameter of hole 6"_inches.
Soil data from test hole:
Depth, inches Soil texture
0-8" Dark brown loam 10yr3/2
8"-12" Brown clay loam 10yr4/4
Method of scratching side wall: Knife
Depth of gravel in bottom of hole 2 inches:
Date and hour of initial water filling 7/31/06 At 12:00 P.M. depth of initial water filling 12 inches
above hole bottom.
Method used to maintain at least 12 inches of water depth in hole for at least 4 hours Automatic Siphon
Maximum water depth above hole bottom during tests 6 inches
Time Time Depth Drop in H20 Perc Rate
9:48 10:18 6" 5.5 5.4
10:21 10:51 6" 5.5 5.4
10:52 11:32 6" 5.5 5.4
AVERAGE PERC. RATE 5.4 MPI
Percolation Test Data Sheet
Lic.#810
i
�Percolating test readings made by: Rusry Olson's Perc. starting at 9:38 A.M. On 08/01/06 �
Location: 2140 Salem Court
Hole number: 2
Date hole was prepared:7/31//06
Depth of hole bottom_12"_inches, Diameter of hole_6"_inches.
Soil data from test hole:
Depth, inches Soil texture
0-12" Dark brown loam 10yr312
Method of scratching side wall: Knife
Depth of gravel in bottom of hole 2 inches:
Date and hour of initial water filling 7/31/06 At 12:00 P.M. depth of initial water filling 12 inches
above hole bottom.
Method used to maintain at least 12 inches of water depth in hole for at least 4 hours Automatic Siphon
Maximum water depth above hole bottom during tests 6 inches
Time Time Depth Drop in H20 Perc Rate
9:49 10:18 6" 4.0 7.5
10:20 10:50 6" 3.8 7.9
10:53 11:33 6" 3.7 8.1
AVERAGE PERC. RATE 7.8 MPI
DATE TIME
CITY OF ORONO CALLED IN
INSPECTION OTICs SCHEDULED
PERMITNO. C�`� COMPLETED �d'�'C�CD ��
ADDRESS �� ��O cS�-JPAeI Cc�✓�T
OWNER �.%� G� D CONTR. ��`�l�-S
TELEPHONE NO.
� DESCRIPTION j ���� f�n K — /l��c�.�n � �^$'F'�'I I
t� 01 FOOTING 11 MECHANICAL RI 18 EXCAWGRADING/FILLING
� 02 FRAMING 13 MECHANICAL FINAL 19 LAKESHORE/WETLANDS
�
O 03 INSULATION 24/25 WOOD BURNER/FIREPLACE 34 TREE REMOVAL
Z 04 WALL BD. 12 WATER HOOK-UP 17 SITE INSPECTION
Q 05 FINAL 14 SEWER HOOK-UP 06 PROGRESS
� 07 DEMO-SITE 27 SEPTIC MAINT. 21 COMPIAINT
v 07 DEMO-FINAL 15 SEPTIC INSTALL. 22 FOILOW-UP
= 09 PLUMBING RI 35 HARD COVER REMOVAL
J 10 PLUMBING FINAL 36 FOUNDATION/REMOVAL
� OWNERICONTRACTOR TO MEET YOU:_YES_NO
v�, COMMENTS:
�
W
a
� ;��C? V o1T' �OQ>�C/� ���.��
0
� /3ot� l�-�0��� ��N�6n! �1��Ti��K
° o?v ` h�'�' �d�,•�-y'- o� ���,�
�
Q
z S 1��, � r?v�1C 1�e� � o✓1c_' S�I�J�N�
W
�
j �S_ � � �` I + To r3� i�lav. c1e c� Q �-I 8. I-�k1�c C
a
W� �WORKSATISFACTORY:PROCEED ❑ PROJECTCOMPLEfE
W ❑CORRECT WORK 8 PROCEED ❑ ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
O ❑CORRECT WORK,CALL FOR REINSPECTION TEMPORARY
V BEFORECOVERING PERMANENT
❑CORRECT UNSAFE CONDITION WITHIN HOURS. p pHOTO TAKEN
INSPECTOR WFLL RETURN
❑STOP ORDER POSTED.CALL INSPECTOR �CITATION ISSUED
❑INSPECTION REQUIRED.CALL TO ARRANGE ACCESS.
Call for the next inspection 24 hours in advance. (952) 249-460�
Owner/Contractor on site:
Inspector. � o ��
White Copyll�spector's File Canary CopylSite Notice
� • 06/28/2606 11:63 7634988290 RUSTYS PERC TESTING PAGE 02
,,
RYSTY OLSON'S SOIL AMD PERC. TESTIN6
11a81 Riverview Rd. NE � HANOVER, MN 55341
Phone 763-498-8779� Fax 763�88-8290
Joseph J. Olson--MPCA license#810
June 28,2006
Steve Lindo
2140 Salem Court
Orono, Hennepin County
To whoux xt may comce�a,
Z was co�atacted by Jim Rettinger to perform a Septic cerixfica�ion on the properiy at 2140
Salem Court. The results of the Sep4c c,e�rbifxcation are as follows.
Soil borings on the property at 2�40 Salem Court.Indicate that the Sep�ic sys�t�nn does not
co�nfrnm to the th�+ee foot separataon n�e&om,the high water table. Therefore at this time the
existing mound system is in a state of nuocompliance to the code Chapter 7080.
Soil boring#1 Elv. -97.8 Mottled soil was located at Elv. -96.5
Soil boring#2 Elv. -97.0 Mottled soil was tocated at Elv. -95.9
Botto�oa o�the e�astivag appacoxamatel0' X 40' rockbed is at Elv-98.2
Or�giu�a]svils undex the mckbed is at Elv:97.0
Original�ils around the system are mottled at 1.1 • �.3 �eet below grade.
Tb,is syste�m is not an immiuent threat to pablic health at this tinae.
If you hsve any questions please call.
SincerelY,
Joseph J. Oason
� � 0612812606 11:03 7634988299 RUSTYS PERC TESTING PAGE 05
t
Loai oi Soll 6orie�
Li�ense i810
Location or ProJe�t: 2140 Salem Court
Borings m�de by: Rusty Olson's Soll and Parc Testing Date:6/Z3/06
Classiflcation System: AA�SHO ; USDS-USDS�SCS �; Unttled : Other
Augar�vd�cha;k 1wo�: H�nd .o�Power� Buckvt or Probe X�,Pit
nng umber 1_ u els�ratlon 9 , _ Mo �I at 1.3_
0"-18" Dark brawn sandy loam 10y�3/1 H20 present at X t�eet
18"-24"Rusty gray brown loamy ssnd to sandy loam 5y5/2
'ng um r� �Surface elevadon�97.0^ cll at 1.1�
0-14"Dark brown sandy loam 10yr3/1 H20 present at X ieet
14"-24"Rusty 8ray brown loamy sand to sandy loam 5y5�2
� � 06/28/2666 11:63 7634988299 RUSTYS PERC TESTING PAGE 06
` . A`7'r'�,
a)�O Sal �' s� ���
� �� � � �� R
# � ;
� � i y ` � 1
) �
��� N `� c � ,
, �B N � . W ' � �
� M`. c�+� N �N L � \
� � , � _ \ .
� , � , .
. 1 � � �� - �
-� ,� ,
, �.�� � ,
� �N �� .
� , � ��. �
z , ,
� . ; . . � �
( , � � . � ti� � .
. \ �
1 � � � � \ �
� " o� ' � \
. � .
�
g
�
7
� � 06f28/2606 11:03 7634988290 RUSTYS PERC TESTING PAGE 64
� prbp�prrna�(s)seera Linde 5i�e Addre�: 214o salem C�d
(P�.�e aresaNGe bhe sysi�m caam��r):
What mathod�vrer+e used bo maloo tit�e�eneln�tlons ror th�oo�npllanca Insp�ion? (ll�:ll�st�noaidpo�n�co✓ezisi�
The fia�Porv/ng//si'Is not arheusflv�nat in s�quenda/arAer no��wfikh cnvnb�iwbbr�s aie n�ry 1a make e dedenr►�abbn)
Yy�Yht.�ok�)
o Probed tank botfGom � Seardxd fw surfaoe oudet ■ Conduc�ed soil borings
o Observed bw liquid kwei v Pertormed hydraulic test Depd�bo Iimi�ng lay� S'�.Q
• bcamined const.reoords • Searched for seeping in yard Deptl�to system bottom�? ,
o Examined empty(pumpe�taek ■ Chedasd for badc up In home a 6camined reoords
Cl prpbed out�lde tank f�or"bladc sal" o Ex�ve ponding in sdl sy5tem/D-boxas o LGU Umldn9 layer Ve�ficatlon
O Pl�sure/vacuum thedc o Homeown�bestfmony 0 Othe�'
o p� o Examined fi�svrging in tank
0 �B�C�C 50��~ab0'V@ 90I�Sy:#8111
0 �1Cf
�Btll�O�tilA�VS�111 —
9ased on the opmplianoe aiterfa,the sy�m stab��is: (check one) � faliing (to pr�tect groundwater) ❑ an
immi►�ent threat Oo public hea�h or safehr(I1PHS), ❑ no�-aompliant(rnoniboring iSsue). ❑ canpliant(non-of the 3
previous condidons). Is tl�is s�bem a EPA Cl�ss V I�e�tion Well? O yes i no
The�one�lhls dowment Is�: ❑ CertlflcaEe of Gompliance / Notloe vF Nonoompllanoe
I hereby aertity as a sta�e of Minnesota liaensed Inspe�bor and/or Deslgner I or Qualified Employee Inspector and/or Qualified Empoyee
Designer I tf�at I oondt�oed an Irwestlgadon t�hat aowra�y debermined the oompiianae status of this sy�em and tfiat m�r reaorded
ob�vations are aacurabe as�this dafie. No determinadon of futute hydreulk perfnrmanoe has been rwr qn be made due fio
unlmown aonditior�s du�ing sysbem aonstruction,abuse of the sysbern,inadequabe maintenarioe,or future water usege.
Ir�ec3ors name(prir�t) ,�6] o�on, , Pho�:r,6���ws•8�T9
Liae�e and/or Registra�on Number, si0 ,.. Addr�s•
��Ipypd bY: ' Address: +�� Rh�er�w i��NE. Nanorer,MN.653�1
Signature Da�e: 6/2S/06
jdm►�dhnm M��§I15.5S)
An mt�st be up�raded,nqoVeaed.ar l�,�di�nued witl�/n!an inarttlts of�t of drls nab�ar w�iir�e shovQAr ppnlad!f
�qr�ive�o�hy bral ar�i�ariae If�e sy�tern fa�s tn pr�Pe�t�ta�d�+�rpunle�ian,daen b�i�e s�n must be�pg�aated
�d,�r Rs ta�d�.rondnwed w�hM the t�e�+pu�d by ruAe ar the Aor.�l cvnm'vranae !f an ex/s�dn�.sy�m�s not failin�as a�linc�d/n
�w,a/M/aas at�teast twn 16et a�o�qn s�oV/s�rabiany tli�ri�e sys�m r�n�['be�g/ao�d,�qoau�d.�P�d,o►r�s use
da�aov�nued,►actiwi�i�d/n�,p any loral a�dnanae a�ar/s m�are s�7ct nNs ab�s nor sy�ary ta syst�►►�s m.sh�v�fand araas, w�d�ed
peroie+c�ai a�ar tha�e u�ed in aov�criia�n wdlr fivo�d,b�ew�ag��d doa�g✓ng�mantr as a�i�d in/aw.
1) Slbe sl�e�bd+whkh indudes the s��em lacadon(mandatnry). Odter iGems eould Indude:well,well seffiaKic bo sysbem,dwelling or
o�'bufldings,bnla(s),reseru�ed sal tt+eatrnent area,surfaae wabet a�soll borin�locadons. Indude as�ullt dnwing if evailabie.
�) Sofl bot'in9 logs�showing eac��horimn. Indica6e tl�e textute,aota',redowmorphk fea4urs depth to bedrock,5bnding wa�er and
whether the maberial is fill.
3) A Ilst of any and all roqulrements of the Iccal ordinance thaR are diRers�t from the sta�e requfremeM�ref�red to on this fam.
4) A homeowner survey of syseern peifnrmanoe.sl9ned by the hon�eo�vr�as being fectual.
S) MonPooring data as approprlabe.
Page 2 of Z
• f
� 1/29/02 Water/Wastewabd'-ISTS4.31
� a
Compliance In�pection Form for Existing
Individual Sewage Treatme�t Sys�e�ns Minn.�a�iu�on
co��ao��r
Compleda�of this fr�rm fuHids the minimal requlremenls of A�irm. Stet.§1 i6 S5(2a01)end Minnes�ota R. ch. 7080(1 a�9). Please
reier to locel adinances Ibr qther requl�eme►►ta or ir�forrnadon,esaedalN Ira'compliance raqufiements fnr bedroam eddl6�on8.
�s
Ds�a oR Inspaction: 6/32/06 RE/�SON 1br In'pectlOn Prooe�tv Trans�ar
PrOpetty Ow�far(s) Sba�[a LindQ Tele�tone(952) �75-9692
P�rspn repuaqng In�on: ]Im Rat�ing� Telephone��52) 4�-92?.5
S�e�wdress: �salem court City=�,7Jp Code 55356
Flre No./ PahOd No. County:li�nna�in Townihlp:
lrega�De�iPdon
I.ocal RaqulsborY Autho�ity: dtv of�rono
D�te sy�t+em ca�strucbed: 6/Z5/85 Sysbs�tt in Sborelsnd Area: yes no S�ben� in Wellhead
Pno�ectlon Area: yes rro 9ystem sanri�a MDN liasn�ed facilil�►: ye.s no lrocsl Pennit# (if arry),�9�
Sysberr�s built piior Go Ap�il i, 1996 and not IocaUad I� S�rsbems bcated in Starel�nd or Wellhead Protecbon
Sho�+eland or Welihead Pra�ection Ar�ea or Serving a Food, Areas or Serving a Food, Bev�age vr Lodgir�
Beverage or Lodging Establishrr�nt Estab{ishmen�,or systems Built afbmr
Mar�cfi 31 1996
is tl�a sys�m an i�nmina�threat tio niuWlc health or �s tl�s�vstem an Im�lnent threat bn oublic haaltl�
�(a y�s ans�,r[s an m�NS sys�i►n) or:a�it.v�(a yes ensr�er[s an IIPHS sy�m1
-Disdtarge af sevvage to tt�e ground svrfaae? YES NO -QI9d�arge of sewage t�the gramd surfaoe? YeS
-Dlsd�arge of sevvage to dralMlle or surface wabers? YES NO -Disd�arge of sewage tiu draintile or surFaoe wators�YES NO
-Sewage badaup into dwelling? YES NO -Sewage bedaip i�o dwelll�g? YES
-S�hiation witfi the potential tio immedi�r and -SIQ�a�on wlth tlte pobel'rtlal bo Immedfatet�►and
ad�er9ely Impact or thr�0en puWk health or adver�►impac#or th�aben public trealCh or
safety? YES NO safely? YES NO
=s tl�svstem failina? (�yes an�is a failing sysieml Is��em fallina� (�yps a�sw�er is a fai/ing sy�m)
-Le9s than 1V110 fee�t of verdcal s�arali�on between -Less than TMREE fieet of v�ca�separa�on betvueen�
sysfi�n battnm and saturabad 9011 or bedrock? YES NO sy56em ba�ttom and satura6ed sal or hedrotk?
-A 9eepage pit,oesspool,drywdl,or leeching pit? 1fES NO -A s�page pIR,oes�ool,dryvvell,a lea�ing pit? YES�
�tl�e svabem non-comnllan!? !a tl�e�y�non-a� i�
- Is U�e sys6em regulated under a mvnibaring plan or - Is the system regulated under a monitoring pla
operating permit'� ('�f no, go to pege a� YES NO opereting permit? (Ii no,go to page 2) YES�
IfYes. If yes.
-Has the required mo�iEaing taken piace? YES NO -Has the re�uired monitoring taken place? YES NO
(ff no, the system is►ron-con�plying) pf no,ihe syst�m is nor�-co►nplyMg)
-The monitoring indicate that the system meets -The monitoring indicabe that the sysbem meets
performance expoctations? YES fV0 perfvrmance expecb�ons? YES PIO
prno, lhe syslem is non-comph�81 flf ra, the system Is rran�omPlyinyl
Page 1 of 2 wq-wwists4.31