The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRe: bldg/grading/buffer plans Melanie Curtis From: Smyth, John R [John.Smyth@bonestroo.com] Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 10:00 PM To: Melanie Curtis; Soren Mattick Cc: Evelyn M. Turner; Tom Kellogg; Amundsen, Darren T Subject: RE: Certificate of Occupancy for 520 North Arm Attachments: image001.jpg Melanie, I stopped by 520 North Arm and reviewed the area of the proposed buffer. The buffer currently does not meet the requirements of the wetland ordinance. It is seeded to turf(sparse) and has thistles that have developed. Brenda (nice lady) the home owner was home and I discussed what needed to be done. I recommended that they cut the thistle so it does not go to seed and spray it in early fall when it is more susceptible to herbicide. It sounds like they will try to seed it on their own so I recommended that they spray the turf and complete a dormant seeding late this fall so the snow will work the seed into the ground. I provided sources of native seed. I indicated I would need to come back next year to review the buffer after it has been seeded. John 7ohn Smyth Associate Direct 651-604-4708 Cel I 651-775-5104 john.smythC�bonestroo.com � Bonestroa 'vis�-�� =✓�� Bonestroo.com to sign-up for SourceONE, our upcoming newsletter. From: Melanie Curtis [mailto:MCurtis@ci.orono.mn.us] Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 1:42 PM To: Soren Mattick; Smyth, John R Cc: Evelyn M. Turner; Kellogg, Tom P; Amundsen, Darren T Subject: Certificate of Occupancy for 520 North Arm Soren &John -Tim Pellizzer has requested a CO for his property at 520 North Arm Drive. This project triggered the wetland regulations—buffer and easements. Soren - If you remember, I think Bruce Malkerson called you about this wetland and conservation easement. It has kind of been at a stand-still since then... Do you know where it was left? Evelyn has a note in the file that says you were discussing the easement issue with the property owner's attorney in October of 2008. John—can you verify compliance with wetland regs? Thank you! Melanie Melanie Curtis Planning & Zoning Coordinator City of Orono 1 Evelyn M. Turner From: Evelyn M. Turner Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 11:48 AM To: 'Smyth, John R' Cc: Willie Gibbs Subject: 520 North Arn Drive-Your file number 139-08000 John: This is a new house that was started a year ago. Willie says it is progressing slowly. They are just nearing time for a framing inspection. Willie noticed that the buffer area and buffer setback has been cleared by grading. Your report indicated the buffer was turf. The approved plan calls for removing undesirable vegetation with roundup and burning. When you are in the area would you check the site to see if what they have done would be an acceptable alternative to the plan. Thanks Evelyn i �� i ; �z � /Y�� __ ___.__ ___ ___ , _ ,� --- -- _--_____.._� _ ____.__ , _ _. . _-- _� ____ _� __ _ __ ___�.� __ _.___C�i.��._�/ � _��/.______ _ w.._ ___ _M.____ _ ---._ .__ ._ ___ _ . __.__� �� __ _____ - __ __ _ _ ___ __-. __ ________ - ---- ._.. _-- -__ ____ _____ _.�__ � _- - - _ _ _G�rS c�s s r �c _' ��5�� 1- __�'Z��f��?�-l __ _ __ � ___w..�.. __ _� _ �� _ __ _ _ _. . __�.__._ .�Tr � �� Z� �� Cj6 � '' �� `� �� C�� h� �S�„�u,,, ��►�-.�- ►��-- r�.�►�ec� �.I— d�I s � �-�� . �- 1 - � "`�� µ-w��„� � � �� .. 4� r< � o a c�g o � N-� � � �� a o�. � 7, .a mm D�p�� o z ( � � _ � �� o�� p zD�c o— � O mcZ Q � z'�D ' '� � co'a�(D �, � O � '� �� A� �,, l Z �..� , a.m`�j�`g�� ?' � j" � 1 � t, � I � �J A . t rn f •■ � � � ;,�, �� 7 � O m � �� . � C��;t u; i ��:_� � � � �, �. ,-� �-' i Y �'.i1. $��r. oG cr—.�,-• �.•� �,�� '. �,a �,}'i'St3� �i�V, t�I�d .�J�� i p��y-�t.r p � W r ' � 4"..:�. . f 7.S�t C'f�'�Ot�tl � . _ � a;�; 4 ir)r��J�';:'F -'"::�.;,`, O . �s '�il�`s it�7EY' �lill��l" r�� !; �Y �c, .:ii•, t.. •• �u'.�ii�� P_�Q�li� �` �" �. �z ��t,��.. . 4FSss;:.. r` �� ; r. 0 ;Il�: �ds}'"ii�l �iYtii L( -:rc _ �� y �.� �.. - � �� r ` ""`�- :JE�Ta?t�L �,�4'�:,U�:� p� `"�`��:;' �U 1�Y '_` i`'`]e 1`�..,,....._I T�i HL `JRL� '�y��:.-� ' � I\\ � vi F=� rC=�1`.�G �i�.�G . � .�r�Y�� '� I . i V�_ r.:t — .`.�t e..... '� r: 1,;7�N_iC .. �. `�:�;`: � � .. _1,.,, . , ,�"'�hi Y ..,:.`1�0 � I��:�.... � � . � �� i7��' :`� "'�.l. .. ` � � `�^�. \s'�,�s ;= � pv �. ;'" 3� � i��, �`� :� �9" � � I 'r 5 °� v ,� � � � � �� .� � �� o �� = ',�a` � � :� � �� ;� �.�:�__..:;. 1Vlessage Page 1 of 3 Evelyn M. Turner From: Smyth, John R [John.Smyth@bonestroo.com] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 8:45 AM To: Evelyn M. Turner Cc: Melanie Curtis; Amundsen, Darren T Subject: RE: Revised Survey for 520 North Arm Drive Evelyn, I believe we can allow the trail in the buffer per Sec. 78-1606 which allows boardwalks, docks or other reasonable access to the wetland not exceeding 8 feet in width. I would consider the wood chip trail a reasonable access which does not increase the impervious surface. Currently people walk across his lawn. The owner called me prior to the submittal and I provided him with the criteria that the trail would need to be 8 feet or less. ]ohn Smyth Associate Tel 651-604-4708 Cell 651-775-5104 john.smyth@bonestroo.com �x� Bonestroo 2335 Highway 36 W St. Paul, MN 55113 Tel 651-636-4600 Fax 651-636-1311 www.bonestroo.com From: Evelyn M. Turner [mailto:ETurner@ci.orono.mn.us] Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 3:42 PM To: Smyth, John R Cc: Melanie Curtis Subject: FW: Revised Survey for 520 North Arm Drive John: This property has a joint dock. So in addition to the access trail to the dock there is trail through the buffer to the property to the north. (See attachment.)The owner says there is already a trail there. Did you know about this? Is it acceptable for it to be within the buffer? Evelyn From: Dave [mailto:dec@qwestoffice.net] Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 1:39 PM To: Dave Gerold Cc: Darren.Amundsen@bonestroo.com; timothy@terragardencenter.com; Evelyn M. Turner Subject: Re: Revised Survey for 520 North Arm Drive Revised Drawing Attached 10/2/2008 Nlessage Page 2 of 3 Dave C. DEMARS-GABRIEL LAND SURVEYORS, INC. David E. Crook, L.S. 6875 Washington Ave. So. Suite 209 Edina, Minnesota 55439-1500 763-559-0908 952-767-0487 952-767-0490 fax dec@qwestoffice.net -----Original Message ----- From: Dave Gerold To: 'Dave Crook' Cc: Darren.Amundsen@bonestroo.com ; timothy@terragardencenter.com ; ETurnera�ci.orono.mn.us Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 10:27 AM Subject: FW: Revised Survey for 520 North Arm Drive TO: Dave Crook @ Demars Gabriel, See message below. We need to show the lake access through the wetland and buffer area. Please add it and resend to: Darren.AmundsenCa�bonestroo.com, timothx(a�terragardencenter.com and dbgeroldCa�pclink.com TO: Darren @ Bonestroo...note the revision/correction heading yourway. TO: Evelyn, Thank you for pointing the omission out to us...Anything else as long as we are revising again? I will wait until 3:00 pm to print unless I hear from you prior. We will drop full size copies to you at Orono offices. Thanks, Dave -----Original Message----- From: Evelyn M. Turner [mailto:ETurner@ci.orono.mn.us] Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 10:12 AM To: 'Dave Gerold' Cc: Melanie Curtis; timothy@terragardencenter.com Subject: RE: Revised Survey for 520 North Arm Drive I have received the survey. It shows no lake access through the wetland and buffer area. Has that idea been dropped? Just a reminder that the wetland/buffer covenanUeasement and the buffer escrow agreement are due when the building permit is picked up. Mr. Malkerson has the first document; the legal description (from your surveyor) needs to be added to it. I am waiting to hear who will be posting the buffer escrow before I draft that document. Evelyn Turner CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail communication and any attached documentation may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure and is intended only for the use of the designated recipient(s). It is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, any unauthorized person.The use, distribution,transmittal or re-transmittal by an unintended recipient of this communication is strictly prohibited without our express approval in writing or by e-mail. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, please delete it from your system without copying it and notify the above sender so that our e-mail address may be corrected. Receipt by 1��2�2��g Message Page 3 of 3 anyone other than the intended recipient is not a waiver of any attorney-client or work-product privilege. 10/2/2008 Page 1 of 1 Evelyn M. Turner From: Amundsen, Darren T[Darren.Amundsen@bonestroo.com] Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2008 3:40 PM To: Evelyn M. Turner Cc: Melanie Curtis; Tom Kellogg; Lyle Oman Subject: 2008-00142 520 North Arm Road Comments 10-2-08 Attachments: 520 North Arm Drive 10-02-08.pdf I received a revised grading plan that addressed previous drainage concerns. The attached grading plan should be incorporated into the final overall plans for the home. Darren Amundsen, PE Associate Tel 651-604-4894 Cell 651-775-5623 darren.amundsen@bonestroo.com ' n Bonestroo 2335 Highway 36 W St. Paul, MN 55113 Tel 651-636-4600 Fax 651-636-1311 www.bonestroo.com CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail communication and any attached documentation may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure and is Intended only for the use of the designated recipient(s). It is not intended for transmission to,or receipt by,any unauthorized person.The use,distribution,transmittal or re-transmittal by an unintended recipient of thls communication is strictly prohibited without our express approval In writing or by e-mail.If you are not the intended recipient of thls e-mail, please delete it from your system without copying it and notify the above sender so that our e-mail address may be corrected. Receipt by anyone other than the intended recipient Is not a waiver of any attorney-client or work-product privilege. 10/3/2008 Message Page 1 of 1 Evelyn M. Turner From: Evelyn M. Turner Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 10:12 AM To: 'Dave Gerold' Cc: Melanie Curtis; timothy@terragardencenter.com Subject: RE: Revised Survey for 520 North Arm Drive I have received the survey. It shows no lake access through the wetland and buffer area. Has that idea been dropped? Just a reminder that the wetland/buffer covenant/easement and the buffer escrow agreement are due when the building permit is picked up. Mr. Malkerson has the first document; the legal description (from your surveyor) needs to be added to it. I am waiting to hear who will be posting the buffer escrow before I draft that document. Evelyn Turner From: Dave Gerold [mailto:dbgerold@pclink.com] Sent: Wednesday, October O1, 2008 9:09 AM To: Evelyn M. Turner Cc: Melanie Curtis; timothy@terragardencenter.com Subject: Revised Survey for 520 North Arm Drive Greetings Evelyn, Mr. Pellizzer delivered a copy of the revised survey to your offices. He left a copy for you and one for Melanie with the receptionist. Please acknowledge by email that you have received it to: timoth terragardencenter.com and _d.bqerold@pclink.com. Thank you, Dave Gerold 10/1/2008 'I� - . . Evelyn M. Turner From: Evelyn M. Turner Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 7:49 AM To: kathryn@alexanderdesigngroup.com Cc: darren.amundsen@bonestroo.com Subject: RE: Dulin - Engineering Comments Kathy: I received it yesterday and sent it on to Darren Amundsen at Bonestroo. I had wondered why the house had moved farther from the easement. I have asked Darren if the easement can be moved east to be centered on the sewer line. If it can the house could be shifted back. But don't do anything until we hear from Darren. Once we know where the easement will be all eaves and parts of the foundation must be clear of the easement. The only thing more I would need is an 11 x17 print of the survey, but wait until we have heard from Darren before you have Gronberg send one down. Evelyn From: kathryn@alexanderdesigngroup.com [kathryn@alexanderdesigngroup.com] Sent: Monday, September 29, 2008 5:20 PM To: Evelyn M. Turner Subject: RE: Dulin - Engineering Comments Evelyn - Mark Gronberg delivered to you updated survey with hardcover calcs today. The hardcover grew a bit only because council ask us to move it away from the easement line. I moved it 3' to be safe because we are unsure at this point how large the footings will be. I think this is all you need from us for the meeting on the 13th. If there is anything else please let me know. Thanks - Kathy On Wed Sep 24 9:45 , 'Evelyn M. Turner' sent: Amundsen will issue another letter. From: kathryn@alexanderdesigngroup.com [mailto:kathryn@alexanderdesigngroup.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 9:44 AM To: Evelyn M. Turner Subject: RE: Dulin - Engineering Comments Gronberg and Amundsen talked and resolved that issue. Gronberg explained why it didnt make good sense to fill more and he had done what should be done for the land. Have you communicated with him to see if he's ok with it now? How do I make sure it is resolved? On Wed Sep 24 9:34 , 'Evelyn M. Turner' sent: This was part of the original staff report. To ensure he had it, I faxed it to Gronberg last Thursday. I think the biggest issue is #5. The plan may need to be revised to fill more of the area between the house and the street and cut near the lake. Evelyn From: kathryn@alexanderdesigngroup.com [mailto:kathryn@alexanderdesigngroup.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 9:20 AM 1 � . To: Evelyn M. Turner Subject: Re: Dulin Other than move the pool, what other items are still not satisfactory to the city engineer? Please get back to me today so I have turn around time with the surveyor. Thank you - Kathy On Mon Sep 22 22:16 , 'Evelyn M. Turner' sent: Evelyn Turner City Planner City of Orono 952-249-4623 952-249-4616 (fax) 2 Page 1 of 1 Evelyn M. Turner From: Amundsen, Darren T[Darren.Amundsen@bonestroo.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 11:22 AM To: dbgerold@pclink.com Cc: Evelyn M. Turner Subject: 520 North Arm Revisions Dave, an emailed pdf file would be fine. I'll just print it here. Please copy Evelyn on the email. thanks Darren Amundsen, PE Associate Tel 651-604-4894 Cell 651-775-5623 darren.amundsen@bonestroo.com ; n Bonestroo � 2335 Highway 36 W St. Paul, MN 55113 Tel 651-636-4600 Fax 651-636-1311 www.bonestroo.com CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:The information contained in this e-mall communication and any attached documentation may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure and is intended only for the use of the designated recipient(s).It Is not intended for trensmission to,or receipt by,any unauthorized person.The use,distribution,transmittal or re-transmittal by an unintended recipient of this communication is strlctly prohibited without our express approval in writing or by e-mail. If you are not the intended reciplent of this e-mail, please delete It from your system without copying it and notify the above sender so that our e-mail address may be corrected. Receipt by anyone other than the intended recipient is not a waiver of any attorney-client or work-product privilege. 9/30/2008 Page 1 of 1 Evelyn M. Turner From: Amundsen, Darren T[Darren.Amundsen@bonestroo.com] Sent: Monday, September 29, 2008 4:12 PM To: Evelyn M. Turner Subject: RE: What's heading your way. Thanks for the heads up. The 520 North Arm revised (9-12-08) drawing was a survey, but still lacked necessary info for complete review. Darren Amundsen, PE Associate Tel 651-604-4894 Cell 651-775-5623 darren.amundsen@bonestroo.com � Bonestroo 2335 Highway 36 W St. Paul, MN 55113 Tel 651-636-4600 Fax 651-636-1311 www.bonestroo.com From: Evelyn M. Turner [mailto:ETurner@ci.orono.mn.us] Sent: Monday, September 29, 2008 4:01 PM To: Amundsen, Darren T Subject: What's heading your way. Darren: Just to let you know that I put two revised site/grading plans in the mail to you today. These are items that are trying to make the October 13 City Council meeting. Was the revised grading plan you received for the new house on North Arm a survey or an architectural site plan? Evelyn CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail communication and any attached documentation may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure and is intended only for the use of the designated recipient(s). It is not intended for transmission to,or receipt by,any unauthorized person.The use, distribution,transmittal or re-transmittal by an unintended recipient of this communication is strictly prohibited without our express approval in writing or by e-mail. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, please delete it from your system without copying it and notify the above sender so that our e-mail address may be corrected. Receipt by anyone other than the intended recipient is not a waiver of any attorney-client or work-product privilege. 9/30/2008 Evel n�31A: Turner �E From: Evelyn M. Turner Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 2:37 PM To: 'timothy@terragardencenter.com' Cc: 'dbgerold@pclink.com' Subject: RE: 520 North Arm Drive Attachments: Engineering review 9-16-08.pdf �� Engineering review 9-16-08.pdf... -----Original Message----- From: timothy@terragardencenter.com [mailto:timothy@terragardencenter.com] Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 2:35 PM To: Evelyn M. Turner Cc: dbgerold@pclink.com Subject: RE: 520 North Arm Drive Evelyn, Please forward a copy of Darrens comments to Dave Gerold and myself. This is the first we have been told about other issues. We could have been working on his other concerns for over a week. I would recommend you copy dave and myself on all communications concerning this permit process. As we have mentioned before, we need to get the foundation in before the ground freezes. Tim Pellizzer Quoting "Evelyn M. Turner" <ETurner@ci.orono.mn.us>: > What he was saying was that the only issue resolved by the new grading > plan was the lack of contour lines showing the proposed grading. All > the other issues remain. I also forwarded the email to David Crook, > your surveyor. You should check with him to make sure he understands > what is needed. > > Evelyn Turner > > -----Original Message----- > From: dbgerold@pclink.com [mailto:dbgerold@pclink.com] > Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 2: 10 PM > To: Evelyn M. Turner > Subject: 520 North Arm Drive > > Hi Evelyn > I rcvd a copy of an email from Darren at Bonestroo to you regarding > acknowledgement of the contours on the survey. He said contour lines > could be removed from his list of comments. > Two questions: > Is the grading plan as indicated by the contour lines approved? > Darrens referred to his "other comments" on his 9/16 report. Are > there other issues related to his comments we should be aware of and > working to resolve? > Please copy Tim Pellizzer when you reply. THANKS Evelyn Dave Gerold > > 1 Page 1 of 1 Evelyn M. Turner From: Evelyn M. Turner Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 2:53 PM To: 'i1k111 @aol.com' Cc: 'dbgerold@pclink.com'; 'timothy@terragardencenter.com' Subject: FW: 2008-00142 520 North Arm Drive 9-16-08 comments Attachments: 520 North Arm Drive 9-16-08.pdf From: Amundsen, Darren T [mailto:Darren.Amundsen@bonestroo.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 4:41 PM To: Evelyn M. Turner Cc: Melanie Curtis; Tom Kellogg; Smyth, John R; Schlegel, Kellie M. Subject: 2008-00142 520 North Arm Drive 9-16-08 comments Darren Amundsen, PE Associate Tel 651-604-4894 Cell 651-775-5623 darren.amundsen@bonestroo.com n Bonestroo 2335 Highway 36 W St. Paul, MN 55113 Tel 651-636-4600 Fax 651-636-1311 www.bonestroo.com CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:The information contained in this e-mail communication and any attached documentation may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure and is intended only for the use of the designated recipient(s).It is not intended for transmission to,or receipt by,any unauthorized person.The use,distribution,transmittal or re-trensmittal by an unintended recipient of this communicatfon is strictly prohibited without our express approval in wrlting or by e-mail. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, please delete it from your system without copying it and notify the above sender so that our e-mail address may be corrected. Receipt by anyone other than the intended recipient is not a waiver of any attorney-client or work-product privilege. 9/30/2008 � Evelyn M. Turner From: Amundsen, Darren T [Darren.Amundsen@bonestroo.com] Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 5:13 PM To: Evelyn M. Turner Cc: dbgerold@pclink.com; Timothy Pellizzer Subject: RE: 520 North Arm Drive Attachments: 520 North Arm Drive 9-16-08.pdf u i20 North Arm Drive 9-16-08.pd... Evelyn, I 'm resending the letter as requested by Dave Gerold. Darren Amundsen, PE Associate Tel 651-604-4894 Cell 651-775-5623 darren.amundsen@bonestroo.com Bonestroo 2335 Highway 36 W St. Paul, MN 55113 Tel 651-636-4600 Fax 651-636-1311 www.bonestroo.com -----Original Message----- From: Evelyn M. Turner [mailto:ETurner@ci.orono.mn.us] Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 2: 18 PM To: 'dbgerold@pclink.com' ; 'Timothy Pellizzer' Subject: RE: 520 North Arm Drive What he was saying was that the only issue resolved by the new grading plan was the lack of contour lines showing the proposed grading. All the other issues remain. I also forwarded the email to David Crook, your surveyor. You should check with him to make sure he understands what is needed. Evelyn Turner -----Original Message----- From: dbgerold@pclink.com [mailto:dbgerold@pclink.com] Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 2: 10 PM To: Evelyn M. Turner Subject: 520 North Arm Drive Hi Evelyn I rcvd a copy of an email from Darren at Bonestroo to you regarding acknowledgement of the contours on the survey. He said contour lines could be removed from his list of comments. Two questions: Is the grading plan as indicated by the contour lines approved? Darrens referred to his "other comments" on his 9/16 report. Are there other issues related to his comments we should be aware of and working to resolve? Please copy Tim Pellizzer when you reply. THANKS Evelyn Dave Gerold CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail communication and any attached documentation may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure and is intended only for the use of the designated recipient (s) . It is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, any unauthorized person. The use, distribution, transmittal or re-transmittal by an unintended recipient of this communication is strictly prohibited without our express approval in writing or by e-mail. 1 . if you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, please delete it from your system . without copying it and notify the above sender so that our e-mail address may be corrected. Receipt by anyone other than the intended recipient is not a waiver of any attorney-client or work-product privilege. 2 Evelyn M. Turner From: dbgerold@pclink.com Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 2:10 PM To: Evelyn M. Turner Subject: 520 North Arm Drive Hi Evelyn I rcvd a copy of an email from Darren at Bonestroo to you regarding acknowledgement of the contours on the survey. He said contour lines could be removed from his list of comments. Two questions: Is the grading plan as indicated by the contour lines approved? Darrens referred to his "other comments" on his 9/16 report. Are there other issues related to his comments we should be aware of and working to resolve? Please copy Tim Pellizzer when you reply. THANKS Evelyn Dave Gerold 1 Evelyn M. Turner From: Evelyn M. Turner Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 2:18 PM To: 'dbgerold@pclink.com'; 'Timothy Pelliuer' Subject: RE: 520 North Arm Drive What he was saying was that the only issue resolved by the new grading plan was the lack of contour lines showing the proposed grading. All the other issues remain. I also forwarded the email to David Crook, your surveyor. You should check with him to make sure he understands what is needed. Evelyn Turner -----Original Message----- From: dbgerold@pclink.com [mailto:dbgerold@pclink.com] Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 2:10 PM To: Evelyn M. Turner Subject: 520 North Arm Drive Hi Evelyn I rcvd a copy of an email from Darren at Bonestroo to you regarding acknowledgement of the contours on the survey. He said contour lines could be removed from his list of comments. Two questions: Is the grading plan as indicated by the contour lines approved? Darrens referred to his "other comments" on his 9/16 report. Are there other issues related to his comments we should be aware of and working to resolve? Please copy Tim Pellizzer when you reply. THANKS Evelyn Dave Gerold 1 Page 1 of 1 Evelyn M. Turner From: Amundsen, Darren T[Darren.Amundsen@bonestroo.com] Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 4:50 PM To: Evelyn M. Turner Subject: RE: 520 North Arm Revised Grading Plan A copy of the 9-12-08 plans did show up on my desk the day after the comments were sent. All comments, except the show proposed contours, still apply to the current set of plans (9-12-08). Darren Amundsen, PE Associate Tel 651-604-4894 Cell 651-775-5623 darren.a mundsen@bonestroo.com n Bonestroo 2335 Highway 36 W St. Paul, MN 55113 Tel 651-636-4600 Fax 651-636-1311 www.bonestroo.com From: Evelyn M. Turner[mailto:ETurner@ci.orono.mn.us] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 12:14 PM To:Amundsen, Darren T Cc: Smyth,John R Subject: 520 North Arm Revised Grading Plan Re: 520 North Arm Drive File No. 000139-08000-2 File No. 2008-00142 Darren: The contractor says he dropped of a revised plan at your office on September 12 and received an acknowledgement�on September 15. This made no sense since your comments are dated September 16 based on an August 15 plan. In speaking with him further, it appears all copies of the plan may have gone to John Smyth. So would you check with John to see if he has the revised grading plan. Please let me know if you do or don't so I can notify the contractor. Thanks Evelyn CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:The information contained in this e-mail communication and any attached documentation marbe privileged,confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure and is intended only for the use of the designated recipient(s).It is not intended for transmission to,or receipt by,any unauthorized person.The use,distribution,transmittal or re-transmittal by an unintended recipient of this communication is strictly prohibited without our express approval in writing or by e-mail. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, please delete it from your system without copying it and notify the above sender so that our e-mail address may be corrected. Receipt by anyone other than the intended recipient is not a waiver of any attorney-client or work-product privilege. 9/30/2008 Evelyn M. Turner From: timothy@terragardencenter.com Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 2:35 PM To: Evelyn M. Turner Cc: dbgerold@pclink.com Subject: RE: 520 North Arm Drive Evelyn, Please forward a copy of Darrens comments to Dave Gerold and myself. This is the first we have been told about other issues. We could have been working on his other concerns for over a week. I would recommend you copy dave and myself on all communications concerning this permit process. As we have mentioned before, we need to get the foundation in before the ground freezes. Tim Pellizzer Quoting "Evelyn M. Turner" <ETurner@ci.orono.mn.us>: > What he was saying was that the only issue resolved by the new grading > plan was the lack of contour lines showing the proposed grading. All > the other issues remain. I also forwarded the email to David Crook, > your surveyor. You should check with him to make sure he understands > what is needed. > > Evelyn Turner > > -----Original Message----- > From: dbgerold@pclink.com [mailto:dbgerold@pclink.com] > Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 2:10 PM > To: Evelyn M. Turner > Subject: 520 North Arm Drive > > Hi Evelyn > I rcvd a copy of an email from Darren at Bonestroo to you regarding > acknowledgement of the contours on the survey. He said contour lines > could be removed from his list of comments. > Two questions: > Is the grading plan as indicated by the contour lines approved? > Darrens referred to his "other comments" on his 9/16 report. Are > there other issues related to his comments we should be aware of and > working to resolve? > Please copy Tim Pellizzer when you reply. THANKS Evelyn Dave Gerold > > 1 Page 1 of 2 � " Evelyn M. Turner From: Evelyn M. Turner Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 10:37 PM To: i1k111 @aol.com Cc: timothy@terragardencenter.com Subject: FW: 520 North Arm Revised Grading Plan Engineers comments on revised plan. From: Amundsen, Darren T [Darren.Amundsen@bonestroo.com] Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 4:49 PM To: Evelyn M. Turner Subject: RE: 520 North Arm Revised Grading Plan A copy of the 9-12-08 plans did show up on my desk the day after the comments were sent. All comments, except the show proposed contours, still apply to the current set of plans (9-12-08). Darren Amundsen, PE Associate Tel 651-604-4894 Cell 651-775-5623 darren.amundsen@bonestroo.com n Bonestroo 2335 Highway 36 W St. Paul, MN 55113 Tel 651-636-4600 Fax 651-636-1311 www.bonestroo.com From: Evelyn M.Turner [mailto:Efurner@ci.orono.mn.us] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 12:14 PM To: Amundsen, Darren T Cc: Smyth, John R Subject: 520 North Arm Revised Grading Plan Re: 520 North Arm Drive File No. 000139-08000-2 File No. 2008-00142 Darren: The contractor says he dropped of a revised plan at your office on September 12 and received an acknowledgement on September 15. This made no sense since your comments are dated September 16 based on an August 15 plan. In speaking with him further, it appears all copies of the plan may have gone to John Smyth. So would you check with John to see if he has the revised grading plan. Please let me know if you do or don't so I can notify the contractor. 9/30/2008 Page 2 of 2 � . Thanks Evelyn CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:The information contained in this e-mail communication and any attached documentation may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure and is intended only for the use of the designated recipient(s). It is not intended for transmission to,or receipt by,any unauthorized person.The use,distribution,transmittal or re-transmittal by an unintended recipient of this communication is strictly prohibited without our express approval in writing or by e-mail. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, please delete it from your system without copying it and notify the above sender so that our e-mail address may be corrected. Receipt by anyone other than the intended recipient is not a waiver of any attorney-client or work-product privilege. 9/30/2008 Page 1 of 1 Evelyn M. Turner From: Evelyn M. Turner Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 12:14 PM To: 'Amundsen, Darren T' Cc: 'Smyth, John R' Subject: 520 North Arm Revised Grading Plan Re: 520 North Arm Drive File No. 000139-08000-2 File No. 2008-00142 Darren: The contractor says he dropped of a revised plan at your office on September 12 and received an acknowledgement on September 15. This made no sense since your comments are dated September 16 based on an August 15 plan. In speaking with him further, it appears all copies of the plan may have gone to John Smyth. So would you check with John to see if he has the revised grading plan. Please let me know if you do or don't so I can notify the contractor. Thanks Evelyn 9/30/2008 � f Evelyn M. Turner From: Smyth, John R [John.Smyth@bonestroo.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 9:50 AM To: Evelyn M. Turner Cc: Timothy Pellizzer; Brenda G. Johnson Subject: RE: 520 North Arm Drive Orono Evelyn, The updated vegetative restoration plan for the wetland buffer meets the requirements of the wetland ordinance. Per section 78-1602 (3) F of the ordinance a cash escrow or letter of credit of $4800 will need to be provided to cover compliance checks and replace any vegetation that dies. Once found to be in compliance the remaining amount in the escrow or letter of credit can be returned to the owner. John John Smyth Associate Tel 651-604-4708 Cell 651-775-5104 john.smyth@bonestroo.com Bonestroo 2335 Highway 36 W St. Paul, MN 55113 Tel 651-636-4600 Fax 651-636-1311 www.bonestroo.com -----Original Message----- From: Timothy Pellizzer [mailto:timothy@terragardencenter.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 9:28 AM To: Smyth, John R; Brenda G. Johnson; Evelyn M. Turner Subject: Re: 520 North Arm Drive Orono Dear John Smyth, Please find Praire Restoration revision for the buffer proposal. They have included in section C number three the amount of seed per acre . I hope this meets the requirements. Please email your response as soon as possible. Tim Pellizzer Smyth, John R wrote: . >Brenda, > >Prairie Restoration has indicated the amount of seed per project without >providing the project size. Please have them provide the project size >or indicate the amount of seed per acre. The ordinance requires 12 lbs >of native grasses and 5 lbs of native forbs per acre. Once I receive >this modification I can make a decision. > >Thanks, > > >John Smyth >Associate >Tel 651-604-4708 >Cell 651-775-5104 >john.smyth@bonestroo.com > 1 >Bonestroo � . � >2335 Highway 36 W >St. Paul, MN 55113 >Tel 651-636-4600 >Fax 651-636-1311 >www.bonestroo.com >-----Original Message----- >From: Brenda Johnson [mailto:brenda@umn.edu] >Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 1:59 PM >To: Smyth, John R; timothy@terragardencenter.com >Subject: 520 North Arm Drive Orono > >Hello Jon: >As I mentioned, we are planning to put in the foundation before the fall > >freeze and hoping that the plan from Prairie Restoration for the wetland > >upland seeding plan is acceptable and is communicated with Evelyn at >Orono's planning office. > >Please copy timothy on your correspondence to Orono so that we can keep >on top of the process. > >Thank you. > >Brenda Johnson >520 North Arm Drive, >Orono, MN 55364 >952-472-2423 > > > > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail communication and any attached documentation may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure and is intended only for the use of the designated recipient (s) . It is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, any unauthorized person. The use, distribution, transmittal or re-transmittal by an unintended recipient of this communication is strictly prohibited without our express approval in writing or by e-mail. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, please delete it from your system without copying it and notify the above sender so that our e-mail address may be corrected. Receipt by anyone other than the intended recipient is not a waiver of any attorney-client or work-product privilege. 2 • Evelyn M. Turner From: Evelyn M. Turner Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 10:04 AM To: 'Timothy Pellizzer' Subject: RE: Engineering Review-520 North Arm Here is the code section, I've marked the specific sections with *: Sec. 78-1606. Permitted uses. (a) Within the wetland overlay districts no land may be used except for one or more of the following uses: (1) Native wetland vegetation, provided that no change is made to the ground elevation; (2) Wildlife and nature preserves; (3) Overhead utility lines and poles that are less than two feet in diameter; * (4) Docks which provide reasonable access to the lakeshore and do not exceed eight feet in width; (5) Public and private flood control structures, ponding and drainage facilities and associated accessory appurtenances as approved by the city; or (6) Environmental monitoring or control facilities, including those related to water quality and wildlife regulation. (b) Within wetland buffer areas no land may be used except for one or more of the following uses: (1) Native vegetation, provided that no change is made to the ground elevation; (2) Wildlife and nature preserves; * (3) Boardwalks, docks or other reasonable access to the wetland not exceeding eight feet in width, poles that are less than two feet in diameter to be used for boardwalks and bridges; (4) Public and private flood control structures, ponding and drainage facilities and associated accessory appurtenances as approved by the city; (5) Environmental monitoring or control facilities, including those related to water quality and wildlife regulation; (6) Overhead utility poles and lines that are less then two feet in diameter, under- ground utility lines and distribution equipment, light poles, traffic signals, traffic regulatory signs, mailboxes and other equipment that provides an essential public service; (7) Retaining walls if the city determines that the retaining wall will protect the wetland from conditions of erosion, when approved as part of a wetland permit application. (Ord. No. 28 3rd series, § 1, 8-22-2005) You can find the entire City Code at: http://www.municode.com/Resources/gateway.asp?pid=13094&sid=23 The legal descriptions for the wetland and wetland buffer must not include these areas. Evelyn Turner -----Original Message----- From: Timothy Pellizzer [mailto:timothy@terragardencenter.com] Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 9:28 AM To: Evelyn M. Turner Subject: Re: Engineering Review - 520 North Arm Dear Evelyn, Good morning. Bonestroo has received the plan from Prairie Restorations on Thursday Sept. 18th. Have you received notification that it passes their exam? Also, John Smyth indicated that a 8' wide path is allowed through the 50' buffer. Is this specified in the code? Could you direct me to that passage? Thanks. Tim Evelyn M. Turner wrote: >If you have questions about the review please contact Darren directly. > >Evelyn Turner >City Planner 1 . .>City of Orono >952-249-4623 > > > > > 2 Page 1 of 1 Evelyn M. Turner From: Evelyn M. Turner Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2008 9:37 AM To: 'gerold@bevcomm.net' Cc: 'nowak1735@mchsi.com'; Christine Mattson Subject: 520 North Arm Attachments: building_height.pdf; Survey Requirements.pdf; admin_ci orono_mn_us 20080828 093704.pdf; ad min_ci_orono_mn_us_20080828_094859.pdf I have looked at the new house permit application in more detail and find the following issues that need to be addressed: 1. The house is three defined stories. See the third attachment. It may exceed 30' defined height. See second attachment for how building height and stories are calculated. 2. Survey does not satisfy the City's minimum requirements. See the second attachment for these standards. When it is revised the delineated wetland should be shown on it and a legal description of the wetland provided. Mr. Nowak uses the word "architectural" on the plans but does not appear on the roster of licensed Architects as of August 1. When the owner signed the demo permit she indicated the shed on the property would not be removed. Now I understand it will be. The last attachment is a scan on the back side of the application. The owner should initial by where the shed was added to the permit. You should bring it with you when you pick up the demo permit. I will be in a meeting until noon and then out of the office until Tuesday. If you have questions before then contact Christine Mattson, Planning Assistant, at 952-249- 4620. She will endeavor to assist you. Evelyn Turner City Planner City of Orono 952-249-4623 952-249-4616 (fax) 8/28/2008 Message Page 1 of 2 � ' Evelyn M. Turner From: Dave Gerold [dbgerold@pclink.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 11:30 AM To: 'Timothy Pellizzer'; 'K. Brian Nowak' Cc: Evelyn M. Turner; Mike Gaffron Subject: FW: Pellizer Revised Attachments: 13609HSE.pdf; 13609HSEW.pdf Greeting to ali, Per earlier emails regarding questions related to the survey for 520 North Arm Drive, find the attached and revised survey. One (307 KB) is in color and the other (306 KB) is black on white. Note that the requested information has been added to the survey. Mr. Pellizzer has offered to drop 3 printed copies to Orono City offices within the next 24 hours. Please forward the email attachments to City Engineers for the start of review. This morning at 9:30, I had a conversation with Willy from the City of Orono regarding Mr. Pellizzer"s request to not remove the storage building that is currently located on the alternate septic site. During initiai conversations with Willy, when he raised a concern regarding the storage building, I stated that if it was required to remove the building to gain approval of our overall septic design we would. This statement became to be understood that we would remove the building. This was mistaken. It later became documented on our permit application that the building was to be removed. In my conversation with Will this morning, he stated that he did not have an issue with the present storage building and would not hold back approval of our septic design with the building as located. Willy did offer that there may be an issue with "hardcover" calculations and City Ordinance limits. I have asked Demars-Gabriel Surveyors to include the present storage building in the revised calculations they have included on the attached survey. I did not receive a call from Robert at Demars-Gabriel stating that there was a conflict with the limits of hardcover, so I am assuming that we are within limits. Please advise me if there are further issues with the detached existing storage building. Please advise me of any additional information you may need as I wish to keep the processing of this permit application moving ahead. Thanks you for your continued help with our application. Dave Gerold -----Original Message----- From: ilklil@aol.com [mailto:ilklil@aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 10:42 AM To: dbgerold@pclink.com Subject: Pellizer Revised 9/30/2008 Message Page 2 of 2 � Dema�s�ab�el land Suryeyors,Inc, 6875 Washington Ave Sa - Suite 209 �'� F Edina, MN 55439 ,�� 763-559-0908 �► � ss2•�s�•oasi �`�:: 952•767•0490(fax) �� we've /�/�ovec�� View full size Dave, Revised pdf files attached. Dave C. Get the MapQuest Toolbar. Directions, Traffic, Gas Prices & Morel 9/30/2008 Message Page 1 of 2 Evelyn M. Turner From: Evelyn M. Turner Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 1:24 PM To: 'Dave Gerold' Subject: RE: Pellizer Revised The City Engineer usually prefers to review full size prints, especially for the initial review. He will be here tomorrow morning for a meeting. If I have the prints by 10:15 I will be able to hand them to him, rather than mailing them. As long as there are no hardcover issues the shed may stay. There will be a form for the owners to sign. I'm sorry but I can't remember the female owner's name. I also need her relationship to Mr. Pellizzer. I will see if I can have the form ready to trade for the plans. Evelyn Turner From: Dave Gerold [mailto:dbgerold@pclink.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 11:30 AM To: Timothy Pellizzer'; 'K. Brian Nowak' Cc: Evelyn M. Turner; Mike Gaffron Subject: FW: Pellizer Revised Greeting to all, Per earlier emails regarding questions related to the survey for 520 North Arm Drive, find the attached and revised survey. One (307 KB) is in color and the other (306 KB) is black on white. Note that the requested information has been added to the survey. Mr. Pellizzer has offered to drop 3 printed copies to Orono City offices within the next 24 hours. Please forward the email attachments to City Engineers for the start of review. This morning at 9:30, I had a conversation with Willy from the City of Orono regarding Mr. Peilizzer"s request to not remove the storage building that is currently located on the alternate septic site. During initial conversations with Willy, when he raised a concern regarding the storage building, I stated that if it was required to remove the building to gain approval of our overall septic design we wouid. This statement became to be understood that we would remove the building. This was mistaken. It later became documented on our permit application that the building was to be removed. In my conversation with Will this morning, he stated that he did not have an issue with the present storage building and would not hold back approval of our septic design with the building as located. Willy did offer that there may be an issue with "hardcover" calculations and City Ordinance limits. I have asked Demars-Gabriel Surveyors to include the present storage building in the revised calculations they have included on the attached survey. I did not receive a call from Robert at Demars-Gabriel stating that there was a conflict with the limits of hardcover, so I am assuming that we are within limits. Please advise me if there are further issues with the detached existing storage building. Please advise me of any additional information you may need as I wish to keep the processing of this permit application moving ahead. Thanks you for your continued help with our application. Dave Gerold -----Original Message----- From: ilklll@aol.com [mailto:ilklil@aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 10:42 AM To: dbgerold@pclink.com Subject: Pellizer Revised 9/30/2008 Message Page 2 of 2 Dema�s�Gabriel l�nd Surueyo�,Inc, 6875 Washington Ave So. � � Suite 209 '�� Edina, MN 55439 � 763-559-0908 � � 952•T67•0487 ��_� 952•767•0490(fax) � �� we��e n�o�Cd� View full size Dave, Revised pdf files attached. Dave C. Get the MapQuest Toolbar. Directions, Traffic, Gas Prices & Morel 9/30/2008 Message Page 1 of 2 ♦ Evelyn M. Turner From: Dave Gerold [dbgerold@pclink.com] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 11:26 AM To: Evelyn M. Turner Subject: RE: Pellizer Revised Thank you Evelyn, Tim is picking up full size prints of the survey @ 5:00 today. He wili have them to your offices @ 8:00 am tommorrow. We would appreciate you hand them directly to the engineers. Regarding the ownership of the property at 520 North Arm Drive. Timothy Pellizzer is the sole owner of the property. He and Brenda Johnson are not married, so I think it would be correct and acceptable after conferring with Mr. Pellizzer to develop your forms for his signature only. Thanks again, Dave Gerold -----Original Message----- From: Evelyn M. Turner [mailto:ETurner@ci.orono.mn.us] Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 1:24 PM To: 'Dave Gerold' Subject: RE: Pellizer Revised The Ciry Engineer usually prefers to review full size prints, especially for the initial review. He will be here tomorrow morning for a meeting. If I have the prints by 10:15 I will be able to hand them to him, rather than mailing them. As long as there are no hardcover issues the shed may stay. There will be a form for the owners to sign. I'm sorry but I can't remember the female owner's name. I also need her relationship to Mr. Pellizzer. I will see if I can have the form ready to trade for the plans. Evelyn Turner From: Dave Gerold [mailto:dbgerold@pclink.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 11:30 AM To: Timothy Pellizzer'; 'K. Brian Nowak' Cc: Evelyn M. Turner; Mike Gaffron Subject: FW: Pellizer Revised Greeting to all, Per earlier emails regarding questions related to the survey for 520 North Arm Drive, find the attached and revised survey. One (307 KB) is in color and the other (306 KB) is black on white. Note that the requested information has been added to the survey. Mr. Pellizzer has offered to drop 3 printed copies to Orono City offices within the next 24 hours. Please forward the email attachments to City Engineers for the start of review. This morning at 9:30, I had a conversation with Willy from the City of Orono regarding Mr. Pellizzer"s request to not remove the storage building that is currently located on the alternate septic site. During initial conversations with Willy, when he raised a concern regarding the storage building, I stated that if it was required to remove the building to gain approval of our overall septic design we would. This statement became to be understood that we would remove the buiiding. This was mistaken. It later became documented on our permit application that the building was to be removed. In my conversation with Wiil this morning, he stated that he did not have an issue with the present storage building and would not hold back approval of our septic design with the building as located. Willy did offer that there may be an issue 9/30/2008 Message Page 2 of 2 j + with "hardcover" calculations and City Ordinance limits. I have asked Demars-Gabriel Surveyors to include the present storage building in the revised calculations they have included on the attached survey. I did not receive a call from Robert at Demars-Gabriel stating that there was a conflict with the limits of hardcover, so I am assuming that we are within limits. Please advise me if there are further issues with the detached existing storage building. Please advise me of any additional information you may need as I wish to keep the processing of this permit application moving ahead. Thanks you for your continued help with our application. Dave Gerold -----Original Message----- From: ilklll@aol.com [mailto:ilk111@aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 10:42 AM To: dbgerold@pclink.com Subject: Pellizer Revised Demars�Gab�el land Surueyo�s,Inc, fi875 Washington Ave So. ;; �� Suite 209 Edina, MN 55439 �,� ,' 763-559-0908 � - 952•767•0487 '�:. 952•767•0490(fax) �� we've /�/�o ve c�� View full size Dave, Revised pdf files attached. Dave C. Get the MapQuest Toolbar. Directions, Traffic, Gas Prices& Moref 9/30/2008 /►.vlessage Page 1 of 3 � Evelyn M. Turner From: Evelyn M. Turner Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 12:30 PM To: 'Dave Gerold' Subject: RE: Pellizer Revised Tim Pellizzer delivered the surveys this morning and signed the agreement regarding the accessory building that is being kept. The surveys and wetland delineation report have been handed to the City Engineer to review the grading and condition of the wetland buffer. Evelyn From: Dave Gerold [maiito:dbgerold@pclink.com] Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 11:26 AM To: Evelyn M. Turner Subject: RE: Pellizer Revised Thank you Evelyn, Tim is picking up full size prints of the survey @ 5:00 today. He will have them to your offices @ 8:00 am tommorrow. We would appreciate you hand them directly to the engineers. Regarding the ownership of the property at 520 North Arm Drive. Timothy Pellizzer is the sole owner of the property. He and Brenda Johnson are not married, so I think it would be correct and acceptable after conferring with Mr. Pellizzer to develop your forms for his signature only. Thanks again, Dave Gerold -----Original Message----- From: Evelyn M. Turner [mailto:ETurner@ci.orono.mn.us] Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 1:24 PM To: 'Dave Gerold' Subject: RE: Pellizer Revised The City Engineer usually prefers to review full size prints, especially for the initial review. He will be here tomorrow morning for a meeting. If I have the prints by 10:15 I will be able to hand them to him, rather than mailing them. As long as there are no hardcover issues the shed may stay. There will be a form for the owners to sign. I'm sorry but I can't remember the female owner's name. I also need her relationship to Mr. Pellizzer. I will see if I can have the form ready to trade for the plans. Evelyn Turner From: Dave Gerold [mailto:dbgerold@pclink.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 11:30 AM To: Timothy Pellizzer'; 'K. Brian Nowak' Cc: Evelyn M. Turner; Mike Gaffron Subject: FW: Peilizer Revised Greeting to all, Per earlier emails regarding questions related to the survey for 520 North Arm Drive, find the attached and revised survey. One (307 KB) is in color and the other 9/30/2008 r.tiless�ge Page 2 of 3 . (306 KB) is black on white. Note that the requested information has been added to the survey. Mr. Peliizzer has offered to drop 3 printed copies to Orono City offices within the next 24 hours. Please forward the email attachments to City Engineers for the start of review. This moming at 9:30, I had a conversation with Willy from the City of Orono regarding Mr. Pellizzer"s request to not remove the storage building that is currently located on the alternate septic site. During initial conversations with Willy, when he raised a concern regarding the storage building, I stated that if it was required to remove the building to gain approval of our overall septic design we would. This statement became to be understood that we would remove the building. This was mistaken. It later became documented on our permit application that the building was to be removed. In my conversation with Will this morning, he stated that he did not have an issue with the present storage building and would not hold back approval of our septic design with the building as located. Willy did offer that there may be an issue with "hardcover" calculations and City Ordinance limits. I have asked Demars-Gabriel Surveyors to include the present storage building in the revised calculations they have included on the attached survey. I did not receive a call from Robert at Demars-Gabriel stating that there was a conflict with the limits of hardcover, so I am assuming that we are within limits. Please advise me if there are further issues with the detached existing storage building. Please advise me of any additional information you may need as I wish to keep the processing of this permit application moving ahead. Thanks you for your continued help with our application. Dave Gerold -----Original Message----- From: i1k111@aol.com [mailto:ilk111@aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 10:42 AM To: dbgerold@pclink.com Subject: Pellizer Revised Demar��abriel land Su�ueyors,Inc, 6875 Washington Ave So. Suite 209 .��-�� Edina, MN 55d39 �i�� 763-559-0908 � � 952-767-0487 ��:� 952•767-0490{fax) �� /(/e've Moved. View full size Dave, Revised pdf files attached. Dave C. 9/30/2008 Message Page 1 of 1 Evelyn M. Turner From: Dave Gerold [dbgerold@pclink.com] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 3:51 PM To: Evelyn M. Turner Cc: timothy@terragardencenter.com Subject: 520 North Arm Drive Good afternoon Evelyn, I hope your day is going well... Regarding: 520 North Arm Drive Bonestroo has now had the necessary information to complete their review for the last week. They were handed the information last Thursday morning after a meeting in your City offices. Would you please do me a favor and place a follow-up call to Bonestroo to discover if they have any issues, estimated time of completion and then update us? I would really appreciate it. I think I heard Mike mention, during our speaker phone conversation, "splitting the file". I understood this to mean that a portion of the flle would be moved to another department for parallel rather than linear processing. Again, my understanding of this"splitting"was to help make up some lost time. Did this happen? Thanks for your help with this project Evelyn. Dave Gerold 9/30/2008 Page 1 of 1 Evelyn M. Turner From: Evelyn M. Tumer Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 10:41 AM To: 'Timothy Pellizzer'; Dave Gerold Subject: 520 North Arm Drive Permit Status Here is where things are at: Grading Plan: Waiting for revised plan to respond to Bonestroo 9/16 comments. Wetland: 1. Buffer improvement plan has been approved. 2. Bruce Malkerson has the wetland easement and covenant document. i. The legal description of the wetland and the buffer (provided by the surveyor) must be added to the document. ii. Signed document must be returned when (or before) the permit is picked up. 3. $4,800 escrow required, due with permit. 4. Escrow agreement required, I will draft. Please let me know who will be�ostinQ the escrow. Signed agreement must be returned when (or before) the permit is picked up. (Owner must sign in addition to contractor, even if contractor is putting up the money.) Building Plans: Plans are on building official's desk (however the inspector is on vacation this week, so building official first priority is inspections) Evelyn Turner City Planner City of Orono 952-249-4623 9/30/2008 Evelyn M. Turner From: Evelyn M. Turner Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 11:09 AM To: i1k111 @aol.com Cc: 'Timothy Pellizzer'; Dave Gerold Subject: Engineering Review-520 North Arm If you have questions about the review please contact Darren directly. Evelyn Turner City Planner City of Orono 952-249-4623 1 Page 1 of 1 . Evelyn M. Turner From: Amundsen, Darren T[Darren.Amundsen@bonestroo.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 4:41 PM To: Evelyn M. Turner Cc: Melanie Curtis; Tom Kellogg; Smyth, John R; Schlegel, Kellie M. Subject: 2008-00142 520 North Arm Drive 9-16-08 comments Attachments: 520 North Arm Drive 9-16-08.pdf Darren Amundsen, PE Associate Te1651-604-4894 Cell 651-775-5623 darren.amundsen@bonestroo.com n Bonestroo 2335 Highway 36 W St. Paul, MN 55113 Tel 651-636-4600 Fax 651-636-1311 www.bonestroo.com CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:The information contained in this e-mail communication and any attached documentation may be privileged, confldential or otherwise protected from disclosure and is intended only for the use of the designated recipient(s). It is not intended for transmission to,or recelpt by,any unauthorized person.The use, distribution,trensmlttal or re-transmittal by an unintended recipient of thls communicatlon is strictly prohibited without our express approval In writing or by e-mail. If you are not the Intended recipient of this e-mail, please delete it from your system without copying it and notlfy the above sender so that our e-mail address may be corrected. Receipt by anyone other than the intended recipient is not a waiver of any attorney-client or work-product privilege. 9/30/2008 � � 2335 Highway 36 W St.Paul,MN 55113 Tel 651-636-4600 Fax 651-636-1311 www.bonestroo.com �Bonestroo September 16, 2008 Ms. Evelyn Turner Planner City of Orono Post Office Box 66 Crystal Bay, MN 55323 Re: 520 North Arm Drive File No. 000139-08000-2 File No. 2008-00142 Dear Evelyn; We have reviewed the grading plan for 520 North Arm Drive, dated 8-15-08. The plans proposed to remove an existing home and construct a new home with an attached garage. We have the following comments with regards to engineering matters: • The survey should show the existing home and garage, if they are still standing. • Existing contours should be provided for the entire lot, including over the driveway. Contours should extend at least 50' beyond all property lines. • All proposed grading should be shown on the survey. It appears all contours currently shown are existing. • Detailed and engineered retaining wall design and details should be submitted for all retaining walls over 4' in height. This would apply to the proposed wall to the north of the garage, • All trees to be removed should be labeled. • A detail for silt fence with steel T-posts should be shown on the plans. • There are two manholes shown to the south of the garage, More information is needed for these manholes, including what type of manholes they are, inverts, type, size, and direction of any pipe connected to the manholes. • lohn Smyth has reviewed and submitted comments on this application regarding wetland buffer requirements. His memo dated 9-11-08 is attached, • � • City of Orono Page 2 2008-00142 9-ib-08 If you have any questions, please call me at(651)604-4894. Yours very truly, Bonestroo � �_� Darren Amundsen cc Tom Kellogg John Smyth Evelyn M. Turner From: Evelyn M. Turner Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 1:09 PM To: 'Timothy Pellizzer' Subject: RE: re:520 North Arm We don't have an approved list. Our wetland consultant did approve a buffer improvement plan from Prairie Restorations on another site, so that going with them would be OK. Evelyn -----Original Message----- From: Timothy Pellizzer [mailto:timothy@terragardencenter.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 12:20 PM To: Evelyn M. Turner; Dave Gerold Subject: re:520 North Arm Dear Evelyn, Hi! We are working on finding someone to make a buffer plan. Do you have a list of approved groups? Is a plan acceptable from the installer i.e. Praire Restorations? Please let me know so as not to go down the wrong path. Thanks. Tim Pellizzer 1 Message Page 1 of 1 Evelyn M. Turner From: Evelyn M. Turner Sent: Monday, September 15, 2008 12:29 PM To: 'Dave Gerold' Cc: Soren Mattick Subject: RE: 520 North Arm Attachments: wetland easement and covenant.doc Here it is. If Mr. Malkerson has questions they should be directed to Soren Mattick at Campbell-Knutson as Matt Brokl (MKB) has left that firm. Evelyn From: Dave Gerold [mailto:dbgerold@pclink.com] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2008 11:33 AM To: Evelyn M. Turner Cc: timothy@terragardencenter.com Subject: RE: 520 North Arm Thanks Evelyn, Please forward the"Form with the language for the Restriction and Covenants from the City."to us. We wiii be forwarding this to Bruce Meikerson for review. Thank you. Dave Gerold -----Original Message----- From: Evelyn M. Turner [mailto:ETurner@ci.orono.mn.us] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2008 10:35 AM To: 'Dave Gerold' Subject: 520 North Arm The letter attached to my last email may have been the wrong one. This is the correct one. Evelyn Turner City Planner City of Orono 952-249-4623 952-249-4616 (fax) 9/30/2008 Message Page 1 of 1 Evelyn M. Turner From: Dave Gerold [dbgerold@pclink.com] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2008 11:33 AM To: Evelyn M. Turner Cc: timothy@terragardencenter.com Subject: RE: 520 North Arm Thanks Evelyn, Please forward the "Form with the language for the Restriction and Covenants from the City."to us. We will be forwarding this to Bruce Melkerson for review. Thank you. Dave Gerold -----Original Message----- From: Evelyn M. Turner [mailto:ETurner@ci.orono.mn.us] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2008 10:35 AM To: 'Dave Gerold' Subject: 520 North Arm The letter attached to my last email may have been the wrong one. This is the correct one. Evelyn Turner City Planner City of Orono 952-249-4623 952-249-4616 (fax) 9/30/2008 Page 1 of 1 Evelyn M. Turner From: Evelyn M. Turner Sent: Monday, September 15, 2008 10:35 AM To: 'Dave Gerold' Subject: 520 North Arm Attachments: wetland buffer evaluation.pdf The letter attached to my last email may have been the wrong one. This is the correct one. Evelyn Turner City Planner City of Orono 952-249-4623 952-249-4616 (fax) 9/30/2008 Message Page 1 of 1 Evelyn M. Turner From: Evelyn M. Turner Sent: Monday, September 15, 2008 9:58 AM To: 'Dave Gerold' Subject: RE: 520 North Arm Drive Attachments: wetland buffer evaluation.pdf Here is the wetland buffer evaluation. Before the building permit can be issued a plan for improving the buffer is required. An escrow is required to guarantee the buffer improvement takes. You also need to provide a legal description of the wetland and the buffer. The City wili prepare the easement and covenant document. I wilt fonNard you the City Engineer's comments as soon as I receive them. Evelyn Turner From: Dave Gerold [mailto:dbgerold@pclink.com] Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2008 3:51 PM To: Evelyn M. Turner Cc: timothy@terragardencenter.com Subject: 520 North Arm Drive Good afternoon Evelyn, I hope your day is going weil... Regarding: 520 North Arm Drive Bonestroo has now had the necessary information to complete their review for the last week. They were handed the information last Thursday morning after a meeting in your Ciry offices. Would you please do me a favor and place a follow-up call to Bonestroo to discover if they have any issues, estimated time of completion and then update us? I would really appreciate it. I think I heard Mike mention, during our speaker phone conversation, "splitting the file". I understood this to mean that a portion of the file would be moved to another department for parallel rather than linear processing. Again, my understanding of this"splitting"was to help make up some lost time. Did this happen? Thanks for your help with this project Evelyn. Dave Gerold 9/30/2008 � Evelyn M. Turner From: Smyth, John R [John.Smyth@bonestroo.com] Sent: Friday, September 12, 2008 5:05 PM To: Evelyn M. Turner Subject: Wetland Ordinance Memos- 505 Willow Drive and 520 North Arm Drive Attachments: scan copy memo.pdf; scan copy memo.pdf � � scan copy scan copy memo.pdf(50 KB) memo.pdf(39 KB) Evelyn, Attached are the Wetland Ordinance Review memos for the above referenced addresses. Let me know if you have questions. John Smyth Associate Tel 651-604-4708 Cell 651-775-5104 john.smyth@bonestroo.com Bonestroo CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail communication and any attached documentation may be privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure and is intended only for the use of the designated recipient (s) . It is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, any unauthorized person. The use, distribution, transmittal or re-transmittal by an unintended recipient of this communication is strictly prohibited without our express approval in writing or by e-mail. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, please delete it from your system without copying it and notify the above sender so that our e-mail address may be corrected. Receipt by anyone other than the intended recipient is not a waiver of any attorney-client or work-product privilege. 1 < Memorandum �Bonestroo 2335 Highway 36 W To: Evelyn Turner Project: 520 North Arm Drive Date: 9/11/2 008 St.Paul,MN 55113 From: John Smyth Client: City or Orono Td 651-636-4600 fax 651-636-1311 � Re: Wetland Buffer Ordinance File No: 139-08000 www.bonesvoo.com Remarks: The wetland ordinance requires wetland buffers due to the proposed new home. - There is one wetland located within the propeny. The wetland is classified as a preseroe which requires a 50 foot buffer and 20 foot setback fram the buffer. � BufFer Condition and Requirements � _ A site evaluation was completed on 9 September 2008 and it was determined that the buffer within the property is turf grass. Per Div. 3 Sec. 78-1605(2){a)turf grass is considered an undesirable plant species and will need ta be removed and replaced with native vegetation. The applicant will need to provide a ManagementlLandscaping plan that includes the fallowing: � 1. Method of establishing native vegetation in the buffer that is turf, {MN BWSR Web Site—Publication: "Restoring&Managing Native Wetland and Upland Vegetation" source for options). 2. Species proposed to be seeded or planted,According ta the ordinance Div. 3 Sec. 78- i 6Q5(3)the seed mix must contain at least 12 pounds(PLS)per acre of native prairie grass seed and 5 pounds(PLS)per acre of native wildflower seed. Pfative prairie grass and native forb maes shall contain no fewer than faur(4)and five(5)species respectively(MN BWSR Web Site—Publication: "Restoring&Managing Native Wetland and Upland Vegetation" source for options). 3. A schedule of activities that are part of the management and maintenance for the establishment of vegetation in the buffer shall be provided. - Sunrey Requirements A boundary depicting the upslope edge of the buffer needs to be shown on the certificate of - survey. A legal description for the upslope edge of the buffet will need to be submitted witt� the Restridions and Covenants(see description below). Restriction and Covenant for Wetiand and Buffer Per Section 78-1611 of the wetland ordinante the owner shall record Resviction and Covenants aver the wetland and buffer with the properry chain of title. A farm with the language fo�the Restriction and Covenants is available ftom the City. . . Wetfand Buffer Markers Formal buffer markers are not required for the p�oposed adivity under the Ordinance, however it is recommended that the buffer is marked by the applicant so they can be avoided during native vegetation development and for review during the vegetation establishment period (approx. 2 years). Wetland Water Quafity Treatrnent Requiremems The buffer will provide adequate treatment for the proposed use of the properry. Recommendations It is recommended that this application not be approved until issues presented in this memo are addressed. An escrow amount for the buffer will be developed after the landscape and - management plan is submitted. Paqe 10!1 � Evelyn M. Turner • From: Evelyn M. Turner Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 4:14 PM To: 'Timothy Pellizzer' Subject: RE: 520 North Arm Drive They will email me their reports. I haven't received them yet; the usual time for the City Engineer is a week. I will forward them to you and the surveyor when I receive them. Evelyn Turner -----Original Message----- From: Timothy Pellizzer [mailto:timothy@terragardencenter.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 3:22 PM To: Evelyn M. Turner; Dave Gerold; BRIAN NOWAK; Brenda G. Johnson Subject: Re: 520 North Arm Drive Dear Evelyn, Just a note to check on the progress of my permit. At our last conversation, the city engineer and wetland consultant were to examine the survey. Do you know if they have completed their work? Any information would be appreciated. Thanks. Tim Pellizzer Evelyn M. Turner wrote: >Brian: > > I don't think we need to meet today. But if you do, it will need to be rescheduled as I'm experiencing some back pain and not sure when I will be in the office today. > >Evelyn Turner > >From: Brian Nowak [BNowak@sharrattdesign.com] >Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 11:02 AM >To: Evelyn M. Turner; timothy@terragardencenter.com; Timothy@mchsi.com; >gerold@bevcomm.net; Mike Gaffron >Cc: Bruce Malkerson >Subject: > >Ms Turner: >I am responding to your email of 8/28 to Dave Gerold. It's unfortunate that you did not give me a call to discuss the plan issues with regard to grade we could have saved everyone a lot of time and effort. The plans are substantively the same as we submitted to Melanie Curtis on 11-07 with very few changes. We spent a number of ineetings and time with the City clarifying the issues surrounding the definition of basement as set out in your code. > >The surveyor should have listed 952.7 as top of first floor. This would make the points at which the 946.7 grade intersect the building as the determining points of the code. I have shown this on the attached sketch. This ends up with a calculation of basement 6' or less at 212.8 feet and greater at 195. 6 feet. Just a point of clarification, the trusses are top chord bearing so all of the truss except for 3 inches sits below the foundation wall. > >Please let me know what the City requires regarding my credentials, Although I am not registered , after gracluating from Cornell University with a Bachelor of Architecture, I have acted as a residential architect for 33 years and during that time as a builder for 15 years. I am currently the director of remodeling at Sharratt Design and have been involved with numerous projects approved by Orono. I am chairman of the Maple Plain Planning Commission and have been with that group for 8 years. Because Tim and Brenda are long term friends I am doing this project outside Sharratt Design having started the work before I went to work with Mike. > 1 � � >We all have too many meetings, so I'm hoping this information will answer your questions and allow you to continue the permit process and cancel our meeting tomorrow. >Again please call at 612-799-3326 if you need any clarification. > >Brian Nowak > > > >K. Brian Nowak >Director of Remodeling >Sharratt Design & Company >464 Second Street - Suite 100 >Excelsior, MN 55331 >Direct: 952-767-5879 >Fax: 952-470-8407 > > www.sharrattdesign.com<http: //www.sharrattdesign.com/> > >CC Bruce Malkerson > > > > > 2 �� City of Orono � � � 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 . � � a� �" Crystal 8ay, MN 55323 G (952) 249-4600 ��o�'� Fax: (952) 249-4616 Date: September 4, 2008 To: Tom Keliogg From: Evelyn Turner 952-249-4623 eturner@ci.orono.mn.us Subject: Review of Grading Plan for Replacement House — 520 North Arm Drive (Building permit application 2008-00142) Please review the attached grading plan for a new house to replace the old. . �� City of Orono � � 2750 Kelley Parkway P.O. Box 66 � �C; Crystal Bay, MN 55323 �' y � (952) 249-4600 ��'� Fax: (952) 249-4616 Date: September 4, 2008 To: John Smyth From: Evelyn Turner 952-249-4623 eturner@ci.orono.mn.us Subject: Review of Buffer Condition for Replacement House — 520 North Arm Drive (Building permit application 2008-00142) Please visit the site and determine the condition of the buffer area on this property. .:. ' � HULT & ASSOCIATES, INC. - Surveyors, Engineers&Wetland Specialists P.O. Box 37 Telephone: 651-464-3130 Forest Lake, MN. 55025 Facsimile: 651-464-4822 dheinrichs@mfra.com January 31, 2007 Mr. Timothy Pellizzer 520 North Arm Drive Mound, MN 55364 SUBJECT: Wetland Delineation Report Mound, MN _ Hult# 06208 Dear Mr. Pellizzer: Hult&Associates,Inc. has prepared this wetland report to assist you with the development of your site north of the City of Mound and to provide wetland-permitting documentation in order to comply with the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act(WCA) and the Clean Water Act Section 404. The site is approximately 2.78 acres,north of North Arm Drive. The site is Lot 3, Block 1, Victoria Estates. One (�)wetland was delineated. The site is located in the Minnehaha Creek Watershed, north of Mound in Hennepin County,Minnesota. This report describes the chazacteristics of the wetland basin and documents its status under the various wetland regulations. If your project will not impaet the wetland, or is below the tilreshold limits outlined below, this report can be submitted to the Local Units of Government to document compliance with the vasious wetland regulations. Wetland Delineation MethodoloQv As part of our wetland delineation, Hult&Associates, Inc., reviewed the available background wetland information on this site. This information included: ➢ National Wetlands Inventory Map(NWI); ➢ Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Protected Waters Map; ➢ Hennepin County Soil Survey; ➢ U.S.G.S. 7.5 min. Quadrangle Map; and ➢ Some aerial photographs. The basin was field delineated(on-site)November 21,2006 using the principles of the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual including adopted modifications, guidance letters and memorandum of agreement. The routine delineation method was generally used and dominant vegetation was evaluated by estimated area cover and the 50/20 rule. Wetlands were classified according to the methodologies in Wetland and Deepwater Habitats of the United States(FWS/OBS Publication 79/31; Cowardin et. al. 1979)and Wetlands of the United States (USFWS Circular 39; Shaw and Fredin 1971). The wetland boundaries and observation points were staked with pink metal flagging. The locations of the staked basins were surveyed by Demars-Gabriel Land Surveyors Inc. and incorporated into the site plans. Basin Characteristics Table 1. Summary of Wetland Characteristics Wetland Class T e On-site Size Comments 1 PEMB 2 N/A Runs alon the northerl ortion of the site. Wetland 1 is a Palustrine Emergent, Saturated(PEMB, Type 2) fringe wetland directly adjacent to North Arm Bay a deep water habitat northerly of the existing house. The fringe wetland consisted of Reed Canary Grass, Common Cattails and Red Osier Dogwood. Saturated soils and standing water was observed near the surface. The adjacent uplands were marked by a distinet topographic and vegetation break consisting of Kentucky Blue Gra.ss, Common Dandelion, Canada Thistle and Black Seed Plantain. There is a remnant large White Oak that had faller�near the wetland boundary, Wetland Jurisdiction Clean Water Act. Section 404 The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers(COE)regulates dred�e and fill activities in navigable waters,wetlands adjacent, tributary, or with significant nexus to navigable waters and isolated wetlands important to interstate commerce. A 2001 Supreme Court ruling has limited the COE jurisdiction over isolated wetlands,but the COE has not yet finalized guidance for implementing this ruling under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. In most cases, if the proposed impacts are less than 400 square feet,the COE does not require notification of the project. If proposed impacts are between 400 square feet and 2.0 acres,the COE requires notification and approval (letter of permission)prior to beginning the project. If the wetland impacts occur in or adjacent to "special waters"andlor exceed 10,000 square feet, the COE review will include a 30-day public/interagency notice. If the proposed impacts exceed the WCA deminimus limits (see below),the COE will require . mitigation for the full aznount of the impacts regardless of the WCA exemption. If more than two acres of wetland impacts aze proposed, an individual permit will automatically be required which includes sequencing(providing there are no alternatives)review by other environmental agencies, a public comment period, and compensatory mitigation. The COE contact person for Hennepin County is Joe Yanta(651-290-5362). Minnesota Frotected Waters Act The Department of Natural Resources (DNR)has jurisdiction over waters of the state that aze generally Wetland Type 3,4,and 5, and aze larger than 2.5 acres in incorporated areas or 10 acres in unincorporated azeas. There is one DNR protected wetland listed on this site,wetland# 1 (the North Arm)with an Ordinary High Water(OHV� level of 929.4 established. The OHW for a lake or wetland is determined by the DNR as the elevation at which the vegetation changes from aquatic to terrestrial. For a watercourse the OHW is the average elevation of the top of the channel banks at any given location. The DNR has jurisdiction over areas below the OHW.No impacts are allowed below the OHW which would have the effect of converting protected waters to upland. Although some activities such as vegetation clearing, sand blankets, docks, etc. may be allowed by the DNR,they may require a permit and the DNR should be consulted as to limitation on any activity below the OHW. The DNR contact is Tom Hovey (651-772-7977). Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act(WCA� A Local Unit of Government(LGU)will have jurisdiction over the wetlands on the site, based on the WCA as amended through 2000. The LGU for this site is the Minnehaha Creek Watershed(Eric Evenson,(952-471-0590). There is a WCA deminimis exemption for the project for the first 2,000 square feet of wetland impacts to Type 1, 2, and 6 wetlands outside of a shoreland protection zone. Within a shoreland protection zone (1,000 feet for a lake and 300 feet from a river)and for other types of wetlands the deminimus exemption is limited to 400 square feet. If the site plans include wetland impacts,which exceed the exemption limits, a WCA permit will be required from the County. Under the WCA rules, an applicant must demonstrate that wetland impacts have been avoided and unavoidable impacts minimized before the activity would be permitted. These rules also require a 2:1 mitigation ratio for fillin�or drainin in anv wetland, or excavation in semi permanentl�to permantel ��flooded wetlands Projects with proposed wetland impacts must also develop a 5-yeaz monitoring plan to determine if the mitigation plan is successful. Permanent deed restrictions will be required over the mitigation azea. ' Clean Water Act Section 402 Under Section 402(P) of the Clean Water Act,the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is required to develop regulations for stormwater di:ccharges. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA)has the authority to regulate the stormwater program under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)program. The MPCA has written a general permit for construction sites, which grade more than 1 acre. As of July 1, 2003, a permit application and fee of $400 (no plans or specifications)must be sent to the MPCA at least 48 hours prior to commencement of land disturbance activities. The permit application required the site owner and contractor to certify the provision of the general permit, including developing and implementing temporary and permanent erosion and sediment control plans,will be followed. The general permit requires that stormwater dischazges be preponded before dischazge to waters of the state (including wetlands). The general permit also requires inspection and maintenance of the erosion and sediment control facilities on a weekly basis. If site grading exceeds one-acre,this permit will have to be obtained from the MPCA. If you have any questions or need additional information,please contact me. Hult& Associates, Inc. appreciates the opportunity to provide you with wetland delineation services. If you fiave additional needs for our services on permitting,planning, surveying, or engineering for this or other projects in the future,please give us a ca11. . Sincerely, , HULT&ASSOCIATES, INC. ' C:r��«�� David M. Heinrichs, Wetland/Soil Scientist ' . � SI�E MAP :. , , ... , . .� _ . � .�� . . �, � - ;�, :,.�, : �<�:::�N° ; � r _ . . , , � , . _ „. , � .� .. �. . . , � � �+ , ,., ;� . , _ ia �� :� ,� -..� �.: .��. ,. � �� . f � �� ;,,� �� •,; "' :�� ; F ,y . ,E � �� , < � „ _.._ ^8�d, r �' �'Y�' �� .,� � � �� a ��.k,� ' . . � .i a�v' � "�' :d, � � _;w£��r z • : ., �n 4 ��e�, ,� L ,7tx�`��'� �.� s e � .. k �T� - " � � . _ ,i _. �.. . . .... .� r.a � ��4 � - � �"� , - . � -.. :; . ... , . ' s. ' �v�'��.;. "� ts°�i.{�..�i : � �,:. ; y "a �y � .'., � �'4�.Y r .S`. x �': �t �' : .t` � �;:. �' � .. ",.�__ ....�:. .. . .. .: �f,6��t11 y;y 1 19�� r �Y• ��„ �r y i n� �;' tl�^�• ��' �. � � � Y� �; ?x.:' *$��-'��q �c"' � �� ,� � ;� �a9�' '"�°r,`,��,r ?'�� 1 '�.`.'��-�& �>��,r. �r� �� :r�. '7•�-----�-,,,...-. 15t �� 4y y�' �t �C�'i_ �i �E Z �� ! dx ,� �y x� j,r"� �w sy��y�'7p 3a;K1 �d'y � �A£f`�i� y`.h�'�eM.� lf� J� �+"�8�� " q.. ��. ,�� ::� . � �vy� .�}s�.�.��.� �. ^,*u' �*�s,�,h � �k. r ..�p �i�,��` � "��I r �� :2�... x"x.§e . '�ir .��+��z��,t�E�.��. 9.� ,�e� � �� k�z' � '�' - a � �� .f �:�� '�as� �i+ -rzl M �"�. � �`c��''�afr� z� s��, sb��'��'es��l � Vi a:� + -�'�. �� ,�`,�'� .� _ �� ' ��'� ��„��x��.� � F �t�ahl � ��:; � � �� y�� .� �� # �� k�;4�� ' I`_y s�R��.x.� 4.�� C,��'�'.« J Y s1�V�,,�3. �t ',�. . ; � ' h , E ..•� 3, .�' � �,�' �� . �'. � '��. � �: , . :,:��.z�s E <'.�`„�� p } ��' �'e"-+�'"�� a� y * �3r/4Y ,� ,� � �� yh�+�`� � � � � �!'��s "� � �� ,'�s.,.�r��.,T 'A �`�,�;`�'�y ��f ra�s`*�� '�v, y . .<.�: ��/.>�1!/ ,. .,�„ '��F"'"''°'�..�:�i L�':'. � , , . . -, .__. �,�:L�� z �� a";:c � �i i.� ��,� �� j� I �� ,,... � �� ,..,»v .�..m. . � �� `� L �, , �� . � �� : � � a � _ �� . �. � � •�, �,j ��, � � � F ,�� a r� a k z ar � '�] � � � � .�.s_'] - � � r � c? �� is�f1 � � �� ,�.3\ ,�� ,�i� � . �� ` a ,� s a m � . .. r� .. . . ', L,�� _ �s � ; ,. �� '�n r _ � '� ��-, � • . # , ; ' . NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY MAP (NWI) � �x � :�� . �,�_ �� ;. ; � ' • ' h . . � , � . DNR PROTECTED WATERS MAP . � � _�; �' ,� . s"� F � < ' � �`F � . . ... �'.7: , _ Oy �� • ';1 '�' ' , ► � � � � � � � � . � �� _ � I +' �, ` s l i : SITE . . 13`� �1�/= � M . ., `. � ., � � ,� � . , _ � � . 19 � � s� �► x�� ; � _ � , � .. .. � �� ii ' � ... . ) ' � Soil Map Units �„ 520 North Arm Road � � Orono, MN ��:h , Ha—Hamel loam,poorly drained - � � �; � � KkB—Kilkenny lo�m, 2 to 6% slopes, well-drained '� K1C2—Kilkenny c�ray loam, 6 to 12% slopes, eroded, well-drained';' LrB—Lester loam,� to 6% slopes, well'-drained .'��: '� �. .; � LsC2—Lester clay 1oam, 6 to 12% 5lopes, eroded,;�yell-drained i � '' '� ' „ Ma-Marsh ; ; + �� _ °, � ,. ; � Sep 23 '2008 9: 26RM HP LRSERJET FRx ^ 952-469-3506 p. l � �'�l� �s� `� `�— �6 � . � �U�.� . o� � � � � �� . � � . � � � � �- �Q.D � P � � � ��s �,,�i 1 � �� . � � �� . � �� a � �� . . � y � J � -� ��, � �� Se'p 23 `2008 9: 26RM HP LRSERJET FRX _ 952-469-3506 p. 2 September 17, 008 An outline of the suggested materials and procedures to be used to establish a prairie grass and wildflower buffer along the Shore of the Pellizer property in Orono A. Bidder Qualifications: The contractur shall submit their qualifications for approv at least three weeks prior to the bid closing. Ta qualify,a contractor must document e Followiag: 1. That the personnel supervising and planting tlus project have documented experien sucGessfully planting prairies. _ . , ._ 2. That the contractor's business specializes in prairie and savanna plantings and/or restorations. 3. Assignment of a Qualified Labor �orce thoroughly familiax and trained in the wor[c. B. Site Prepar�tion: 1. In areas with actively growing vegetation apply Raundup Originalmax�herbicide per manufacturer's directions. Allow a minimum of 10 days before disturbing the vegetati.on with other procedures. 2. Burn offthe dead vegetation by implementing a controlled bum using appropriate procedures,equipment and permits. 3. Respray with Roundup Originalmax�herbicide if regrowth of vegetation occurs when it reaches appmximately 10" to 12" in height. 4. Lightly till the soil to create an open seedbed. 5. Harr�w or rake the soil to create a firm, smooth seedbed. C. Seed and Seeding: 1. Seeding da�es shall be in the spring or surnmer before August I��`or in the fall een September 20�'and Ereeze-up. 2. All seed shall be applied by broadcasting. 3. The seed rnixes shall consist of the following species and arnounts: Se`p 23 �2008 9: 26RM HP LRSERJET FRX _ 952-469-3506 p. 3 Short dry mix: (appro�rastely SO'Y.) 53°/a Little bluestem,32%Side oats grama, l0%Blue grama by PLS weight. 3%June gress, 1°i6 Kelm's brome, 1"/o Poverty oats grass b�bulk weig�t................................................. 41bs. Mbced heigbt mesic miz:(apProumstety 40%) 32%Big bluestem,28%Little bhtostem,22%Itld'lari gra�s, 10%3ide oats gl'ama,3%Caneda wild rye,2%SwitCh grass by PLS weight 1%Kalm's brome, l%June grass, 1°�Sand dropseed by bulk weight........................................................ 31bs. Tall wet mfit:(approximately 10%) 43%Big b}uestem, 10%Canada wild rye, 8%Switch grass,4%Indian grass,4°10 Little bluestem by PLS weight. 12%Cua•d grass, 10°k Blue joiat giass, _ ._. _ _ . . _ _ �2%_Fting�d.hrnrae,2'Yo Yirguiia wild rye,2"/o Wool gr.ass, _ _ _.__ 2%Grcen bulrush, 1%Giaat bur-reed by bulk weight......................... 1 lb. Wildflowers oz./project area Giant hyssoP(Agastache foenic�+lum).................................................. 1 az. Leadplant(Amorpha canescens).......................................................... .5 oz. Swamp miikweed(Ascle,pias incarnota).............................................. .5 oz. Butterfly weed(Ascle,�ras tuberosa) ........... ....................................... 1 oz Smooth aster(Aster laevrs). ................................................................. .5 oz. NewF,agland aster(Aster novae-angliae).......,.................................... 1 oz Common ox-eye(Heliopsis helianlhoides).......................................... 1 oz Bushclover(Lespedeza capitata)........................................................ .S oz. Tall blazing star(Liatris pycrroslachya)............................................... 2 oz. Wildbergamot(Monarda,f�ctulosa)..................................................... 1 oz. Wtrite prairie clover(Petalastemum candidum)................................... l oz. Purple prairie clover(Petalostemta�e pr�rpureum)..........................,..... 2 oz. Mountain mint(Pycnantheraum virginiarrum)...................................... l oz. Yellow coneflower(Ratibida pfnnata)..............................,.................. ] oz. Black-ey�Susan(Rudbeckia hrrta).................................................... 2 oz. Stiffgoldenrod(Solidago rigida)......................................................... l oz. Tall me$dow rue(Thalictrwrr dasycarpum)......................................... l oz. B1ucvervain(Verbena hastata)............................................................ 2 oz. Culver's root(Yeronicastrt�m vlrglnicum)........................................... 1 oz. � Golden alexanders(Zrzta mrrea).......................................................... 1 oz. D. Eroaion Control: 1. The planted areas must be mulched with clean straw at a rate of 1.5 tons per acre. E. Plants and Plantiug: 1. As an option,the planting can be further diversified with wildflower and/or grass seedlings. These will be planted individually in appropriate microhabitats throug. ut, or in designated areas of the project. The plants used will consist primarily of spec es other than those previously seeded. Sep '23 2008 9: 26RM HP LFlSERJET FRX 952-469-3506 p. 4 2. A suggested total of 1,400 plants could be used. Wildflowers Canada aaemone(Anemone canaderrsis) Meadow blazing star(Liatris ligulistglis) Panicled aster(Aster lanceolatus) 'ha•k's cap lily(Lilium michiganense) Azm-e aster(ABter oolentangtensrs) Prairie phlox(Phlax pilosa) Red sblked aster(Aster puniceus) Prairie rose(Rosa arkansana) Northe�n bedstraw(Galiun:boreale) Balsam ragwort(Senecio paupercaulia) Yellowish ge�atian(Genlfcura alba) Ironweed(Yernonia fasciculata) Rough blAzing star(Liatris aspera) . Grasses and Sedges .. . _: Pra�rie a�ebol�s�texele ) dropyee�{S� P� _..... ._..._..... ._..._.. _ ... - --- - --- �------ �- F. Management: 1. Management(maintenance)plays a vital role in the eventual suacess of any native landscape installafiion, especialiy during the establishment period. 2. Dwing the first growing season the project area may need to be mawed to control annual weed developmen� If a"closed" canopy of weed cover develops, it should e mowed to aid in the growth of the prairie seedlings by reducing competition. Mo ng is may also be necessary if the weeds ars about to set seed. Optimum cutting height, depending on the wildflower species present, is typically 4 to 6 inches.Mowings d ne by PRI will be billed.separately unless they ar�included as part of the instailation contract. � 3. In years follawing the first growing season,management services could include sit monitoring,burning, mowing, spot spraying, or hand weeding. These services sho d be con�tra�cted separately from the installation contract. Please note that manageme t services aze typically billed on a t'vne and materials basis(a breakdown of cost ingredients would be available prior to conEract acceptance). " G. Costs: The base site preparation, seed and seeding work as outlined Above can be completed for the lump sum of..................... $4,200.00 Seedling pluga would be optional at$2/plant—in�talled. Note: As an option,PRI will pmvide a follow-up consultation appraxitnately 1 month after the completion of the project(if the project was seeded in the fall,the consultation will occur the follo spring). The Restorationist(or salesp�son)will meet with the project owner to assess the status of e projeCt,answer any questians,and provide any necessary r�omrnendations. This follow-up consul ion will be provided at no additianal cost t 1 Agreement for Removal or Retention of Conforming Accessory Structures Right-of-Entry THIS AGREEMENT,made and entered into this � day of�+�Pisi, 2008,by Timothy Pellizzer,a single person,(hereinafter referred to as "Applicant")and the City of Orono, a Minnesota municipal corporation(hereinafter referred to as the "City"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Applicant has made application to the City for demolition of the principal residence structure on the properiy located at 520 North Arm Drive within the City of Orono, Hennepin County, State of Minnesota, such property legally described as: Lot 3 block 1 Victoria Estates (hereinafter referred to as "Subject Property"); and WHEREAS,the Applicant is the owner of the Subject Property; and WHEREAS, the Subject Property contains a principal residence structure and a conforming accessory structure shown on the survey or site plan attached hereto as Exhibit A and WHEREAS, Applicant is aware that according to Orono Municipal Zoning Code Section 78-1432, once the principal structure has been removed the conforming accessory structure(s)will no longer be conforming,as they will no longer be accessory to an existing principal structure; and WHEREAS,the ordinances of the City require removal of all accessory structures at the time of removal of the principal structure, because such accessory structures may become a public nuisance due to lack of on-site property control and management; and WHEREAS, the Applicant intends to, upon demolition of the principal structure, immediately replace the principal structure on the site with a new principal structure in a location such that the existing accessory structure(s)will remain conforming. WHEREAS, the City intends to allow the accessory structure(s) to remain on the Subject Property during construction of the new principal residence structure with the expectation that said accessory structure(s) will again become conforming as soon as construction of the new principal residence is completed. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES TO THIS AGREEMENT AGREE TO THE FOLLOWING: 1. Applicant may retain the existing accessory structure(s),subject to the following conditions: A) Applicant agrees to obtain a building permit for construction of the replacement residence within 60 days of demolition;to begin construction on the new residence 1 . � within 120 days of demolition; and to complete all exterior work within 1 year of building permit issuance and interior work within 2 years of building permit issuance. B) In the event that any activity described in item A has not been accomplished within the defined timeframe, the Applicant shall remove the accessory structure at the Applicants' expense. C) If one of the item A events occurs and the Applicant fails to perform his removal obligations per item B, the Applicant hereby agrees as follows: 1. The City may enter upon the property and remove the accessory structure(s). 2. The City may assess the costs of removal to the property. 3. This Agreement shall be binding upon current and future owners of Subject Property, and shall be filed within the chain of title of the Subject Property. 5. Applicant shall indemnify and hold harmless the City, the City Council, and the agents and employees of the City from and against all claims, damages, losses or expenses, including attorney fees,which the City, City Council and agents and employees of the City may suffer or for which it may be held liable, arising out of or resulting from the assertion against them of any claims, debts or obligations in consequence of the performance of the terms of this agreement. CITY OF ORONO: By: �. (,�,1 h,u�i Its Mayor� BY: �'e,�-r,� � l/ Its City Clerk ACKNOWLEDGEMENT STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. � COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 8'� day of �jP�t,�� , 2008, by Jar►1�s m. �vl�e � ��dQ •S. Ve� , the �� t C�y G�t�,�-� of the City of Orono on behalf of the municipal corporation. , �-��Q Notary Public � BARBARA G.SILUS f NOTARY PUBLIC-MINNESOTA My Gommission F�cpKes Jan.31,2013 2 , , ACKNOWLEDGEMENT STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,2008,by,the of the City of Orono on behalf of the municipal corporation. Notary Public APPL T: � ACKNOWLEDGEMENT (APPLICANTS) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) �'/ The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this��`day of September,2008, by Timothy Pellizzer , a single person, as his free act and deed/on behalf of the corporation. � `-�/�-O�LLt-C� �� ' MONICA A.FADNESS Notary Public ' NOTARY PUBLIC-MINNESOTA My Commiesfon Expires Jan,31,2012 3 5 - ` �W%iw.Pw Nap�ellP4 W!M P4�>a i0d �rih�h� � /�r � , � , � � fr � � t 8 � � � y �' - k �� Fy � 9E R p , az w O & I x > : s � �a � � a n `> q s �`. �= Ccy� �� u � � xbla a N�h f Z -Q R ox ty $i a9 �O i � m o 9�6� �l ¢ ,� N � Z �as�l �� w�o %, %` o s � �� °'�� : � y �,�2 ' : / 9 c y; c c c �-.�'. . i' � /� � a o E� s s a� �?� � ,3� / 3 u < � � � � �c O ,°�9�/ i//// y/'' � � ��#i� � ��j � r / �N� / / 7 �` x 6�g��3 � � �� / i // �/a�:�/i( � � � \ Y �.i5�� n � / �� /�' � �� - � °' ��1 � o o� �� i � 'sl /�l � �� / � �� ' 1 I�a"�I 1 I I ' � re � �_�� I � � \� � aa� �� °� h � � j � �''� I � ' '9, /� ��1 � � � §�� °s' ' �� 1 �� ' � \*�� "�i � `��t�� \ �a � �� --� V�i�n � �� ` � �og� l ' �\ � ��Ji ��Irt� � L. q � � h --- \ V �� k� � � � / � 4 a,,��:� � � �� g� �. � �I \I�x1 \\� \ P� / \ �_ a ��i �°,� � 1 e o k � I g � \ � ��^ a � � � � � ' , j � k I \�\��iy � ��o�.�,��' �`�� ? c � � ssa a a„ � � ; 11 !41 \ � � / /✓ �y�e 9 ,— _Wj1"�: \ � __ �i - A�$ a 8 - � . � /� 1 : �� ' �� . ' � J j 1�� 1 1 I 1 �5�\�-� � "g� r'y a�� j SI, � _� � o ., a�� I . � � ��:a3�/p� '��.1'; _«' � � � � � � �" O i /� � :�g�'ti._ � '' —�� .�°� I 4 � �s� : � �/ ,;�; ��si�p�llia�� '� .l� � � � � ��`f � � �/� �� //� �y 5�l � a� ; / � \ � ��? e2 � � w � �� n � , �� /�•� k ,� , — � �.s i�o�.� � � b / A \ "� � _�- �" � �� - �� '��„ >>'4 f��' \ \ �� o � � �� , ��. � � a � � � , � � � j �� ` � � <�_ � � �o �� =o !- '' ''� a� ` s � � ."� � �p }� Qe�:Q° F- , � •.\ 8 a �, �� / /� �c�! i j 5 k \ �� ..��\*�6 \ �y �� v _ �� A // F_ � o� � `il �� j� \ C j � \\ � �.�� ' 0. � � � o - .. � � � / � .�_-- � � �, I/��3�� <� � 6 / � pfY} / ,, 'e�/ / \ '� \ 'b 54\•�4. / �� / F- �a /��e £�°�F � � °� �� \ a \ g / / `a��9 � / � �� \ i � ��a� E� � � 8 4 a � 1 �� `� � � �� ,� � - � /o °ge ' � C� $� \ ��. ^ / / �� / �$F� g , F ��\ � 4 /� / g�;�= I C� � �' � y �E� � / .c �. �� J F \� / 5�� /� / � �o�` ,CR8 / 8 'z�3"�a /, / ��.;�RA � �� N R�� q�A Project Project No Page Client Prepared by Date � � � � � Calculations for Reviewed by Date l�, �I � C 4- � t� ► � OK� ��1� v�.- w i�h�� _ �.b C.� b�e.�� nc:..� � �r�►� �ou,��r �� Zo�a � � . � Du. G��t— , �l� wi�� I �St,c� ��-- � �.;�- �- ,� r�-- � �C.��W . _ �C�� . � � �� s .; �- , _ _ C� . ; ` , ,. , � _---� � ��-I�� -�' s �� Z� �(� I� �� 2� 6 � -� DO � �� r C��, �-�-4-�"� �S��,v�1 t�2�✓�'�i' I��C' r�,�l^2C�I f�C�" �IS' . � �-�� • G' 1 �� ,;� av , ,,; G � l C 8 �� `« : � � �` 3�r �� `� �•.��'�� ,�_ �� ;� � � � ..� -� ,;,� . f;. � �� City of Grvr�t� '` �� R.d. Hox 6�, �� '� � �� ,r �- Gr}�stal Ba �N �.,323 �, �, ' �" � t'35�)249-4��0 �; y �� f . ,�` � 1��/U�1(D8 OB:I8:U3 �� ; ,� "�,> , f ; f .,;. r ; t Custame�: 7imothv Pellizaer-E�cro�a ' ° I � ESCRC�1 DEROSRS � ��: , ' e , �.,,,; � �� 48CU.G�� 48U0.G� �A � ` �� , ;�ts t�ar'tt+ Fm� Br•ive ' t Sl1BTD7�tl. 4,B{�G.Uu �� TAX f1«Ot� ,� �� i ; � ,, T4TAL SRLE 4,80�.G0 �, j Che�k R�cei4red �BOU.UG " � ': ,;; CNANGc Q.UU ' "� ,� `". � . �:; C�RK#� fii4 TRAN5# ;�98 � � � kf i � ;�. x ', .;.�6��.�� '^s ��:r � E k :t . k� , "'`',� f � b� ,ra 7 '2'�x. q �. � Y s ''� ��`J j M'•