HomeMy WebLinkAboutRe: as-built survey 8-28-2014 Melanie Curtis
From: Robert Bean (bobbe@bolton-menk.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 3:33 PM
To: Christine Mattson
Cc: Andrew Mack; Melanie Curtis; David P. Martini; Brian Simmons
Subject: 2013-00858-2325 Glendale Cove Lane
Christine,
I performed a site inspection regarding the Asbuilt Survey for Glendale Cove Lane on 8/26/14. Following are my
comments for your consideration:
1. A retaining wall on the southwest side of the property was constructed within a Drainage and Utility easement.
An encroachment agreement should be submitted for this wall.
2. A retaining wall on the west side of the house is over 4' in height. Walls 4'or greater in height should be
designed by a Professional Engineer, and plans submitted for review and approval. Verification from a licensed
Professional Engineer should be submitted stating the wall was constructed per industry standards and the
design meets required factor of safety margins.
If you have any questions or comments, please contact me to discuss.
Thanks,
Robert E.Bean,Jr,P.E.
LEED Green Assoc.
Water Resources Engineer
Bolton&Menk, Inc.
Consulting Engineers&Surveyors
2638 Shadow Lane,Suite 200
Chaska, MN 55318
P:(952)448-8838,ext 2892
F:(952)448-8805
email: bobbe@bolton-menk.com
www.bolton-menk.com
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
1
- ��.�..
LEG EN D REVISEONS
� Ptanning�Zonin�Pian�nr;�w �€a�x �
O6A1f3�tlAf
•� O DENOTES SANITARY MANHOLE � �
�!B�11�V�6W Q�•
REvi5E6 F A k
RECEIVED ao ,5 0 �5 so so � _
DENOTES ITYDRANT
��p � 6 ?Q�� �A�����H��G������ SCALE IN FEET ❑ DENOTES CATCH BASIN
°o�""�' " GLE � DALE '
���Y OF ORONO � uA � c � DENOTES STORM MANHOLE
� �v�, ✓ \
0 DENOTES STORM APRON
�Q E ��` p DENOTES SET iRON MONUMENT • o
� �o -, �:t� � � �
� � � � � D E N O T E S F O U N D I R O N M O N U M E N T NORTH Z �
-�,� �GRADING P�AN r ` �
���� � � ` � �S9• � x 000.0 DENOTES EXISTING ELEVATION �m
p APPROVED� �e w�o ,�. �Q. 46 �• ` � �
�'APPFZOVED ITH VISIU�IS �� �A \��; ��(�O�'¢� � (000.0� DENOTES PROPOSED ELEVATION � �
� � �
�� �.3' '>E`j r� ` �.-- DENOTES DIRECTION OF SURFACE DRAINAGE
� <
�
--.- � ' ,\'��O ��j�� R�� `oCb� O t�� A � �ti� � DENOTES SANITARY SEWER SERVICE ELEVATION � �
'� ` _ !`"` �" ��`\� ��� � 9����'� � TRAN DENOTES TRANSFORMER TB DENOTES TELEPHONE BOX w �
�x_ . . I � J' � }
� ��c \ � 10Q3.'S `�0,� � 4.5 � 3
I � �G�� � '� � '� ' � n�- I v Fp RLS 12755 � ���-� -- DENOTES EXISTING CONTOUR DENOTES PROPOSED CONTOUR w o
� R �s�• AI O��s� J � \� 1005.6 = m
! � c�6 �� , ��, ,. �$� o�/ 1�f TB NOTES: � �
\ 1 N ���5'7� / / � 1.)EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE SNOWN IN AN APPROXIMATE WAY ONLY. Q �
� � �$ � � �. .T� � � THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ANY AND �
I � '�� ��' �� � �.,�"�_ � � ��� � ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BEFORE COMr�tENCING WORK. HE AGREES TO BE � �
` \ � / i4 ` 1�,�,���'�'�Qw�?� @ ?�Q i,+ {� �� FULLY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY AND ALL DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF HIS �+�s rb3y
,$ � l � �"����o� � � ( ��W"���, � FAILURE TO EXACTLY LOCATE AND PRESERVE ANY AND ALL EXISTiNG � 3`
I � \ 1 `a r,,, ����`y�R_ O �+.�1'`�`�I� l� „ �'3 ��s ���-- UTILITIES. �, �,
ay9,� � ,` c0 `�"�� �lJ i Z �j � 2.)MUST MAINTAIN A MINIMUM 2%SLOPE GRADIENT TO ACCOMMODATE '�o+y �r`6�
` 1` �[��, ti � ��x�'��-/��/�. f' p . �P * / POSITIVE DRAINAGE. ��ks �s.
�/ �1 ��`n ��. •� � l`C � 1 1 �t
�\ �'P�� �e�y7,8� ` '�?S � j � ��� i - 3.)ALL OFFSET IRONS ARE MEASURED TO HUNDREDTHS OF A FOOT AND
/ � '�'y �� t O � � � -,+l CAN BE USED AS BENCHMARKS.
� .� ,��' �
p 991.7 � .992.0� \ � t901• � � _t00�- �' = r f• 1. .a``'`� 4
O �,, � G� � � F��j. � . � 's/ .)THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY SHOWN IS CONCEPTUAL ONLY AND DOES
�7'`�` -�� �S �/ � o� �1 NOT PURPORT TO SHOW EXACTLY HOW THE DRIVEWAY SHALL BE BUILT. }.
O 991.4�J�- !
�p 991 3 992•3 �F.l� S� �`ZJ����S.f� �p � O1 / � � � 5.)A TI7LE OPINION WAS NOT FURNISHED TO THE SURVEYOR. � � Z �
� 991.9 99152��� • i � (,j,J o
„ J x 9 9 8'8 __ ,_/ 6.)PROPOSED GRADES SHOWN ADJAGENT TO BUILDING FOUNDATION � � g w
O992.5 99t Z 991 Z� � " \ � B� -��,�� � ' - � REFERS TO TOP pF BLACK DIRT. � 0 O o Z
991.� � �+ 888.22 I �- O � = v �
Z 991.3 �99�2.0 \ \V � �996 � � `_ _ �- - -' - � `� 7.)BENCHMARK: W � �
991.7 �
v' MNDOT GEODETIC STATION#81489-MONUMENT IN BRIDGE SIDEWALK IN � Q Q Q �
99Z•5 991.2 9g2 a �.� � � 995 2 � SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WILLOW DRIVE. Q � W Z �
� �* U �' u' �
�` ELEVATION=1012.81 (NAVD88) � a Z � O
FD 1" SOLID N89�2� �OQ��W 1 fjf�� 993'7 1 993.4� � FD RL� �` � (,� N U
� S� 'l I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRIiE AND CORRECT REPRESENTATION W
� OF A SURVEY OF THE BOUNDARIES OF: (�
SETBACKS �� LOT 6,BLOCK 1,GLENDALE COVE,ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT
MIN. FRONT YARD SETBACK=30� OFFSET IRONS HARDCOVER FLOOR AREA RATIO THEREOF,HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA
MIN.SIDE YARD SETBACK=10',10' ELEVATIONS ARE TO THE TOP OF PIPE LOT AREA= 17,374 S.F. LOWER LEVEL=1430 S.F. AND THE PROPOSED BUILDING TO BE CONSTRUCTED AND OTHER ��
MIN. REAR YARD SETBACK=30' pS#1 =1003 51 os�s=�9a zz HOUSE AREA=2,388 S.F. MAIN FLOOR=1441 S.F. IMPROVEMENTS AS PROVIDED TO ME THIS 16TH DAY OF AUGUST,2013. DRAW/CHECK
os#2=1005�3 OS�:=996 0� DRIVEWAY AREA=903 S.F. UPPER LEVEL=2062 S.F. MNK/DBP
DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATA - WO SIDEWALK AREA=88 S.F. GARAGE=947 S.F.
GARAGE FLQOR ELEVATION =1005.5 DATE
BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION =gg�.p BASEMENT STOOP AREA=222 S.F. TOTAL=5,880 S.F. 07-31-13
TOTAL PERIMETER AT OR BOOK/PAGE
PROPOSED ELEVATIONS UNDER 1002.1 FOOT CONTOUR=86.5 S.F. TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA=3,601 ;;.F. TOTAL LOT AREA=17,374 S.F. NA
PROPOSED GARAGE FLOOR ELEVATION =1006.1 TOTAL PERIMETER =172 S.F. JOB NO.
PROPOSED TOP OF FOUNDATION ELEVATION=1006.4 COVERAGE= 20.7% F.A.R.=.34 David B. Pemberton, Licensed Land Surveyor 31202-138
PROPOSED BASEMENT FLOOR ELEVATION =997.7 COVERAGE= 50.3% Minnesota License No. 40344 DWG. NAME
CERT 31202-138
� � � � e, j n v-� .n � � � I n n�r� _