My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
#5117-variances-2004
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
P
>
Pheasant Road
>
2800 Pheasant Road - 21-117-23-32-0004
>
Resolutions
>
#5117-variances-2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 4:06:03 PM
Creation date
7/3/2018 12:28:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
2800
Street Name
Pheasant
Street Type
Road
Address
2800 Pheasant Road
Document Type
Resolutions
PIN
2111723320004
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
, <br /> � O� <br /> O O <br /> � � <br /> CITY of ORONO <br /> ti <br /> ��� �G~' RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCI L <br /> `9kESI�Og' NO. g � 1 '� <br /> of house and driveway which allows for an unusually substantial area of lawn in the <br /> runoff flow path for infiltration. In order to avoid filling in the 0-75'zone to <br /> accommodate the driveway, the applicant was approved for a retaining wall <br /> adjacent to the driveway. <br /> b) Now that the house is completed and final grades established, applicant has <br /> concerns about the necessary height of the retaining wall. S afety is the primary <br /> factor which supports eliminating the wall.The wall as approved was at the edge <br /> of the driveway,with an immediate drop of 2.5',then a 1:1 downslope for another <br /> 3-4',with gradual slope after that. The driveway functionally is about 6'above <br /> original grade at this point,and filling/grading would have stopped at the 75' <br /> setback line.This immediate grade change in an area that wiil have pedestrian <br /> traffic, children playing, etc. is less than ideal. <br /> c) The visual impacts of the wall would be primarily as it is viewed from the lagoon. <br /> Grading the slope and vegetating it will provide a softer and more natural view <br /> from the lagoon than a 64'long, 2'-6"high wall.The driveway itself will be only <br /> minimally visible from the lagoon regardless of whether the wall is built. <br /> d) Creating a 3:1 slope from the diiveway(elev.942')to the existing grade(934�will <br /> eliminate 64'of retaining wall,or approximately 50-60 s.f.of hardcover,which will <br /> allow for a better situation in terms of runoff. The trade-off is that rainfall that <br /> would have fallen on a relatively flat lawn surface at the base of the wall,will now <br /> fall on a slope and be somewhat more prone to run off than soak in during certain <br /> storm events. To mitigate any negative runoff impacts that might be created by the <br /> increased slope in the 0-75'zone,a 5-10'wide vegetated border/buffer should be <br /> established at the base of the slope. This area shoUld be maintained in high grasses <br /> or other vegetation which will allow for greater infiltration in this area. <br /> e) Because City code requires finish grades to be 3:1 or flatter,the 8' total drop <br /> translates to a 24'wide slope about 80'in length.Total fill needed for the project <br /> is approximately 250 cubic yards. <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.