Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,June 11,2018 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> 15. LA18-40 MATTHEW AND ANGELA HOPPING,95 SMITH AVENUE,CONDITIONAL <br /> USE PERMIT AND SECOND DRIVEWAY <br /> Curtis stated the applicants are planning to construct a new residence on the property. The grading plan <br /> involves the import of approximately 250 cubic yards of material with a total site disturbance of <br /> approximately 815 cubic yards. Grading and filling activities in excess of 500 cubic yards require a <br /> conditional use permit. <br /> The new home is designing to have an upper,main garage facing Smith as well as a lower garage to <br /> accommodate their desired number of vehicles on site. They are also requesting approval of a second <br /> driveway access onto Smith Avenue to access the lower garage. <br /> The Planning Commission held a public hearing,during which time there were neighbors present <br /> expressing concerns about the potential for the construction project to adversely impact their narrow <br /> street. Following the public and discussion,the Planning Commission voted 7-0 on a motion to approve <br /> the requested conditional use pe�nit. The Planning Commission did not discuss or make a <br /> recommendation on the second driveway access request. <br /> After the public hearing, Staff discussed the neighborhood concerns with the applicants and asked them to <br /> consider proactive solutions,including parking restrictions and/or off-street parking during the duration of <br /> the project. The applicants have requested the City post the street"no parking"on one side of Smith <br /> Avenue in order to maintain an open roadway during the construction. <br /> Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit. The Council tonight should direct Staff to draft <br /> a resolution regarding the conditional use permit and the second driveway request. <br /> Walsh noted the City does not receive a lot of second driveway requests and that it is not a given it will be <br /> approved. <br /> Curtis stated the grading plan does reflect the second driveway. Curtis indicated she and the City <br /> Engineer met with the property owner and discussed their grading plan and their request for the second <br /> driveway. Curtis stated she believes the second garage location is important to the property owners. In <br /> an attempt to maintain their location within the setbacks on the lot,the applicants' engineer did try to <br /> provide a grading plan to utilize one curb cut and get around the house but that he was not able to design <br /> anything that is more feasible. <br /> Rief noted the elevation drops ten feet in that area. <br /> Curtis stated the area is low and that they plan to hold up the fill to access the second driveway with a <br /> wall. <br /> Walsh asked how many residences are on the road. <br /> Curtis stated approximately five. <br /> Walsh stated the road is definitely a concern as far as access in and out and that he would like to hear how <br /> they can make it as safe as possible. <br /> Page 9 of 20 <br />