My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-11-2018 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
2018
>
06-11-2018 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/28/2018 8:12:24 AM
Creation date
6/28/2018 8:12:21 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,June 11,2018 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> 15. LA18-40 MATTHEW AND ANGELA HOPPING,95 SMITH AVENUE,CONDITIONAL <br /> USE PERMIT AND SECOND DRIVEWAY—Continued <br /> Seals commented she feels the same way. <br /> Dankey stated she is torn because the applicants are trying to be respectful and have a place to put their <br /> vehicles indoors. <br /> Seals noted they are not saying they cannot have the two garages but rather they cannot have two access <br /> points. <br /> Crosby asked why Staff did not make a recommendation on the second driveway. <br /> Curtis stated there are standards in the code for a second driveway access on residential properties,and it <br /> states one driveway approach shall be allowed from up to two single-residential parcels and to the same <br /> road provided appropriate easements are in place. Parcels having frontage on more than one public road <br /> shall be allowed a driveway approach to a public road. Curtis stated the code does not specifically say <br /> you can or cannot have two driveways. <br /> Dankey commented if this was a large lot,she would probably feel different about it. <br /> Seals moved,Crosby seconded,Application No.LA18-40,Matthew and Angela Hopping,95 Smith <br /> Avenue,to direct Staff to draft an approval resoluNon for the conditional use permit,subject to <br /> parking being restricted on one side of the street,with construction vehicles being kept on the <br /> property as much as possible,and with notice being given to all the contractors regarding the <br /> parking and turnaround; and to deny the second driveway access. <br /> Schutt asked whether those would be additional conditions to the conditional use permit. <br /> Walsh indicated they would be. <br /> VOTE: Ayes 4,Nays 0. <br /> 16. LA18-41 CITY OF ORONO TEXT AMENDMENT: GATE OPACITY— <br /> ORDINANCE NO.209 THIRD SERIES <br /> Curtis stated this application is regarding a change to the regulations for driveway entrance gates. Gates <br /> at driveways are permitted but must meet certain standards,including a 5-foot setback from all property <br /> lines when associated with entrance monuments. Gates and entrance monuments are permitted up to <br /> eight feet in height. Fences are allowed up to 42 inches in height adjacent to the street except in yards <br /> abutting a county highway on a lakeshore lot,where the maximum height is six feet. Fences may be <br /> privacy in nature or 100 percent opaque. <br /> In addition,there is a proposed formatting modification regarding gates in locations where entrance <br /> monuments do not exist. In these instances,gates would not be permitted to extend higher than the <br /> permitted fence. <br /> Page 16 of 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.