Laserfiche WebLink
� , <br /> atypical climatic conditions be taken into account when wetland delineations are conducted and approved through the <br /> Wetland Conservation Act. It is also worth noting that one of the parameters examined during the survey,soils,are <br /> relatively resistant to annual fluctuations in climate; it typically takes more than a year or two for nonhydric soils to <br /> develop hydric characters,and vice-versa.The soils on either side of the boundary at this site were respectively hydric <br /> and nonhydric. <br /> But what I find most upsetting about the inspection report is the implication that I changed the lakeshore. As you can <br /> see from the attached pictures(best if you zoom in above the steps),one taken in February 2015 an the other in May <br /> 2015,the property when I purchased it h�d�rass pl�nL�cl to the top of the rack wall. Granted if'�s fi�f��ir��frt��rt r�lect <br /> as the hc�use was�bandoned for tvuv yea�s,as ra���as the c�lc�er couple did not maintain the yarrt f�r�rn�ny ye�r�. Since <br /> the area was previously planted with grass we will permit it to be planted with plain grass seed rather than a native mix. <br /> Sod, however, is not permitted as it interferes with normal buffer plant growth and soils. Please also note that the buffer <br /> cannot be mowed, per Section 7(a)of the Wetland Protection rule.A�d wF�ile it is rtc�t c1e�r fE'+�t1�the pict�r���s mc�st of <br /> the s�r�d was;�uereti with silt frc�m�tte�igt�wat�r t�f 2fl14,the prior steps did lead dc��rr�t��k��+ct�=, Adding additional <br /> sand on top of what you have described as natural,though atypical, silt accumulation interferes with normal buffer and <br /> wetland plant growth and soils and is not permitted.Once again it was in neglect, but it existed for almost 40 years. This <br /> was confirmed by neighbors. In summary, I did not change the shoreline, I specifically instructed my Landscaper, Chris <br /> Wagener of W Landscapes,to repair what already existed. <br /> In closing, I strongly feel that the noncompliance letter, based off 1 Hydric Test,a test that would not have resulted if the <br /> construction project would have continued as remodel, but most importantly,the shoreline was restored/refurbished to <br /> what has existed for almost 4 decades before it fell into disrepair, is based on incomplete information. <br /> I look forward to discussing and resolving as quickly as possible. I hope to hear from you today. <br /> Cheers, <br /> Kirk Moore <br /> Kirk M Moore, CFA� <br /> Head of Global Fixed Income Research <br /> .................................. <br /> T: +1 612.678.4948; F: +1 612.547.1778 <br /> 707 2nd Ave. S, Routing: H16/00216 <br /> Minneapolis, MN 55402 <br /> ��� �"��� <br /> �''�COUJM8IA <br /> THREADNEEOLE <br /> ����� <br /> �x a�cA.v�a�er. <br /> Advisory services provided by Columbia Management Investment Advisers,LLC. <br /> 5 <br />