Laserfiche WebLink
Happy New Year! <br /> Brent Teele <br /> 612-210-3344 <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: Christine Mattson fmailto:CMattson(a�ci.orono.mn.usl <br /> Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 1:05 PM <br /> To: Brent Teele; 'Amy Sullivan Teele' <br /> Cc: Melanie Curtis <br /> Subject: RE: Agreement for Accessory Structure <br /> Mr. & Mrs. Teele, <br /> After consulting with the City attorney we will remove item #6, but#4 needs to remain. A modified agreement <br /> is attached. We are on summers hours which means we are open until 5:00 pm tonight or 7:30 am to 11:30 <br /> am tomorrow, Friday, June 25th. <br /> If you choose not to sign the attached agreement, we will notify our attorney and direct him to proceed with <br /> criminal prosecution. <br /> Respectfully, <br /> Christine Mattson <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: Brent Teele fmailto:Brent.TeeleCa�threesixtvsales.coml <br /> Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 10:56 PM <br /> To: Melanie Curtis; 'Amy Sullivan Teele' <br /> Cc: Christine Mattson; Brent Teele <br /> Subject: RE: Agreement for Accessory Structure <br /> Hi Melanie / Chris - <br /> Upon further review with our Attorney, we are requesting that points #4 and #6 be REMOVED entirely from the <br /> attached agreement. If this can be accomplished we can meet at your office this Friday and sign. Please <br /> advise. <br /> Reasoning behind requested changes: <br /> Point#4 -We don't have $1,000 dollars to have you hold until the end of the year, we are agreeing to remove <br /> the structure or get a permit, we have given the City permission to enter on the land and remove the structure <br /> and charge us for it, the City has the ability to assess our taxes for the removal, the City has the ability to <br /> criminally charge us and fine us if we don't comply. It's just plain unnecessary. <br /> Point#6 - This may cause a future cloud on our title that has to be cleared every time we refinance or the <br /> property is sold, it could place a restriction on the property that could conceivably be more restrictive than <br /> future restrictions, the language might prevent a future purchaser from even applying for a permit, our <br /> mortgage companies have to consent to any voluntary encumbrance on the property pursuant to the terms of <br /> our mortgages and requiring us to sign #6 requires us to violate our mortgage terms and could call for the <br /> acceleration of our mortgage, and the city ordinances are claimed to prohibit the placing of this or a similar <br /> structure on the described area so encumbering our title to the property is requiring of us something that is not <br /> required of any other landowner. <br /> 2 <br />