Laserfiche WebLink
Christine Mattson <br /> From: Melanie Curtis <br /> Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 1:06 PM <br /> To: Christine Mattson <br /> Subject: Re: Agreement for Accessory Structure <br /> Good. Thank you. <br /> On Jun 24, 2010, at 13:04, Christine Mattson <CMattson(a)ci.orono.mn.us> wrote: <br /> > Mr. & Mrs. Teele, <br /> > <br /> > After consulting with the City attorney we will remove item #6, but#4 needs to remain. A modified <br /> agreement is attached. We are on summers hours which means we are open until 5:00 pm tonight or 7:30 am <br /> to 11:30 am tomorrow, Friday, June 25th. <br /> > <br /> > If you choose not to sign the attached agreement, we will notify our attorney and direct him to proceed with <br /> criminal prosecution. <br /> > <br /> > Respectfully, <br /> > <br /> > Christine Mattson <br /> > <br /> > <br /> > <br /> > -----Original Message----- <br /> > From: Brent Teele [mailto:Brent.Teele@threesixtysales.com] <br /> > Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 10:56 PM <br /> > To: Melanie Curtis; 'Amy Sullivan Teele' <br /> > Cc: Christine Mattson; Brent Teele <br /> > Subject: RE: Agreement for Accessory Structure <br /> > <br /> > Hi Melanie / Chris - <br /> > <br /> > Upon further review with our Attorney, we are requesting that points #4 and #6 be REMOVED entirely from <br /> the attached agreement. If this can be accomplished we can meet at your office this Friday and sign. Please <br /> advise. <br /> > <br /> > Reasoning behind requested changes: <br /> > <br /> > Point#4 -We don't have $1,000 dollars to have you hold until the end of the year, we are agreeing to <br /> remove the structure or get a permit, we have given the City permission to enter on the land and remove the <br /> structure and charge us for it, the City has the ability to assess our taxes for the removal, the City has the <br /> ability to criminally charge us and fine us if we don't comply. It's just plain unnecessary. <br /> > <br /> > Point#6 - This may cause a future cloud on our title that has to be cleared every time we refinance or the <br /> property is sold, it could place a restriction on the property that could conceivably be more restrictive than <br /> future restrictions, the tanguage might prevent a future purchaser from even applying for a permit, our <br /> mortgage companies have to consent to any voluntary encumbrance on the property pursuant to the terms of <br /> our mortgages and requiring us to sign #6 requires us to violate our mortgage terms and could call for the <br /> acceleration of our mortgage, and the city ordinances are claimed to prohibit the placing of this or a similar <br /> structure on the described area so encumbering our title to the property is requiring of us something that is not <br /> required of any other landowner. <br /> i <br />