My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Re: permits
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
F
>
Ferndale Rd W
>
1065 Ferndale Road West - 02-117-23-43-0021
>
Correspondence
>
Re: permits
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 4:10:45 PM
Creation date
6/14/2018 11:30:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
1065
Street Name
Ferndale
Street Type
Road
Street Direction
West
Address
1065 Ferndale Rd W
Document Type
Correspondence
PIN
0211723430021
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
,Thanks,for responding back on this. The variance for the project entailed a setback with the remodel <br /> project. This was not a new build and the survey as-built confirms the work that was permitted. <br /> Regards, <br /> John Daly <br /> Revision,LLC <br /> 153 East Lake St. <br /> Wayzata,MN 55391 <br /> Lic#BC639027 <br /> 952-540-7150 cell <br /> 612-462-4000 office <br /> www.revisiomm�.com <br /> From: Mark<markQ@�ronber�assoc.com> <br /> Sent:Thursday,January 25, 2018 11:26 AM <br /> To: 'Christine Mattson'; Daly,John <br /> Cc: 'Elizabeth DETOR'; 'Melanie Curtis' <br /> Subject: RE: 1065 Ferndale Rd.W. <br /> John:We were not under the impression that this was to be a full as-built survey.Should we go ahead and make it that? <br /> From:Christine Mattson [mailto:CMattson@ci.orono.mn.us] <br /> Sent:Thursday,January 25, 2018 11:13 AM <br /> To: 'Daly,John'<John@revisiomm�.com> <br /> Cc:'Elizabeth DETOR'<libbydetor@mac.com>; 'Mark Gronberg'<mark�@�ronber�assoc.com>; Melanie Curtis <br /> <MCurtis@ci.orono.mn.us> <br /> Subject: FW: 1065 Ferndale Rd.W. <br /> Hi John, <br /> Thank you for the attached survey. It looks like the surveyors have changed from the proposed to the as-built. <br /> The attached as-built survey does not meet the City's as-built survey requirements which require all improvements to be <br /> shown with final topography, retaining walls and all hardcover i.e. flagstone walks/paths, steps/stairs, etc. as well.As-built <br /> hardcover calculations are also required. <br /> Please submit the update information for our review and don't hesitate to contact us with any questions. <br /> Christine Mattson <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.