My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Re: septic issues
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
O
>
Orono Orchard Road North
>
030 Orono Orchard Road North - 35-118-23-33-0037
>
Septic
>
Re: septic issues
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 4:58:41 PM
Creation date
6/6/2018 12:18:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
30
Street Name
Orono Orchard
Street Type
Road
Street Direction
North
Address
30 Orono Orchard Road North
Document Type
Septic
PIN
3511823330037
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5. Imagine my surprise when I get your recent email telling me that there is another hoop I have to jump through <br /> (another inspection). Based on this new additional requirement, the as-built drawing was a complete waste of <br /> money and time (finro months). Once again, where is the common sense?Why the change of requirements?Why do <br /> you not honor a certified surveyors document if you require it? <br /> I am requesting an immediate return of my deposit money. No further property inspections are appropriate. No one <br /> looked at the site before I put up the garage, how can anyone now determine the condition of the site?The <br /> inspection will be completely arbitrary. And forgive me for being skeptical, but now I am expecting the worst, I am <br /> expecting another delay/requirement to be asked of ine (after you send someone out in April/May. I am expecting no <br /> one will come until I remind you. And I am expecting that this process will cost me additional money. I shouldn't <br /> have to remind you that the deposit is my money, not the city's. <br /> I am requesting an explanation why a common sense review of a project cannot be done instead of enforcing <br /> blanket requirements on all projects regardless of the size and scope of the project. <br /> I am requesting reimbursement for the$1316 extra I was required to spend that added no value to this project. <br /> Respectfully, <br /> Steve Gerber <br /> 320.253.1994 <br /> PS, as you can see, I'm copying the mayor and one of the council members. I believe that this process has been <br /> unreasonable and needs to change. I also want to see changes that benefit the next person and help relieve stress <br /> and expense for others. <br /> On Feb 8, 2018, at 9:43 AM, Christine Mattson<CMattson(a�ci.orono.mn.us>wrote: <br /> Good Morning Steve, <br /> We have received the as-built survey,thank you. Our engineer has reviewed the survey. When the <br /> weather permits(after the snow melts)an inspector will visit the site to confirm the survey accurately <br /> depicts the conditions on the ground and that any disturbed areas have been established with <br /> vegetation. <br /> Your escrow money will be refunded after the site visit is made and no issued have been identified. <br /> Please don't hesitate to contact us with any questions. <br /> Christine Mattson <br /> Planning Assistant <br /> City of Orono <br /> 2750 Kelley Parkway ( Orono � MN � 55356(physica/addressJ <br /> PO Box 66 � Crystal Bay � MN � 55323-0066 (mailing addressJ <br /> '� 952.249.4620 ' 8 952.249.4616 <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.