Laserfiche WebLink
� Ci.ty of ORONO <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> � NO. 1711 <br /> • - • • <br /> f'� �'-= �<�"�� ��;;` �,i;i <br /> r �: .. . . . _ _ �xr,:U t,>;a.:�•.:�J <br /> � -ri;� At: .� °�♦ ��' <br /> - � - ;�a +r''.� ':�,AiS n . <br /> i y i� '�, �:�. <br /> '- ' - c.: .. ._ <br /> zoning code requirements prior to purchase. Any hardship <br /> seems to be self imposed. <br /> e) This is a tax forfeit property. <br /> f) A total of one-half sewer unit was charged indicating <br /> intent on the part of City that the lot is substandard. <br /> � g) No lateral sewer assessment was laid against this property <br /> thereby again indicating the substandard status of the <br /> property. <br /> h) The property falls short so far of the zoning standard <br /> that it is too great to enable justification of granting <br /> of the variances requested. <br /> i) The property does not conform to the current development <br /> pattern of the neighborhood. <br /> 17. In denying this application, the City upholds its previous <br /> action in denying lot area and lot width variances for the same <br /> property (August 27, 1977 , - Home Federal Savings and Loan) in <br /> consideration of the following: <br /> a) The same performance standards are still in effect today: <br /> LR- 1B (effective January 1 , 1974) 1 acre area - 140' <br /> width <br /> R-1C (effective September i4 , 1967) 1 acre - 140 ' width <br /> b) At the direction of the 1977 Counci l , the appl icant was <br /> advised to acquire the vacant lots. An owner of the <br /> adjacent vacant lot appeared at one of the public <br /> meetings and was advised to contact applicant to arrange a <br /> lot combination. <br /> c) The property has not been improved and sti 11 requires an <br /> excessive area variance. <br /> 18. Approval of an application that requires a 75 per cent <br /> 8 <br />