Laserfiche WebLink
w i{.. , <br /> • r � yy <br /> e <br /> . "F':',Prt.. <br /> -:.�,.�;�5. <br /> �%=�- <br /> h!'tiUTF.: OF ".7lE RECUI.AR COUNCII. MF.F:T7NG HF.I.D ON AUGUST 2T, ]gg�, pAGB 3 <br /> f R32 H1►RRIET RppL Counci ]r:��mb�.r Grabek staied that th� di f fe:encc in <br /> grad� is orely at,out one toot from the surve�� submitted, <br /> Grabek stated tl.ai the gradc is raised near thc 2ake <br /> and the qrade across from Hehl's property is ev�n with <br /> thc roa�:. Crnb,•k stated that Mz. McGzecvy aperos <br /> ,�� satiati�c!, who was once in opposition to the fence. <br />,.�.+ <br /> �:apor Butler stated that when an individ�ral builds a ' <br />' house, they are allowed i.o grade, Butler stated that <br /> thc cl�vation o: thc curtent yard is the same as the <br /> street. Putl�r stated that grading is allow�d to` <br /> control <irair.aq� en a property. 8utler asked did the ;� <br /> staff do right ar wronq. Butler statecl thaL. she felt <br /> the staff was zight ir. ir.terFrr`ing thc fencp � <br /> otdinance. <br /> Counci lmemh�r Frahm stated that thc gr��ding was donc �; <br /> nca- the tennis uzt, <br /> see aa ,�� � Fr�hm stAted that he couldtt't r <br /> Hehl"����� , W,�� ' at' w'ould hav� ��ffected birs. , <br /> �, iite�3 Lhat this type of fence � <br /> alanq ��, ,�{prp� ` �re� at� all ovcr Orono. <br /> � ,� <br /> Connci It�rr,iber C•nl,ek staEed t.hat the fence was not put t <br /> �'� LO �E 't�' �nYon�. Grabek st��ted that the code y <br /> I�lOMS qri�?in� t� he don�. C.rabek stated that the ������ <br /> City can't pro!ect every�ne's view of the l�ke when �` <br /> thry don't cc�n liv� on the lnke. <br /> ,.;� <br /> Don Strec•tc�t SL�L�•<? that staff stated at the Planning <br /> Camr�ission meet.ing that if the request to build a 1 <br /> f�ncF .is prescr,t�d along with a gradin { <br /> staff would not. havc� a 9 PZAn, that °4 <br /> pprcved thc fence. �"" <br /> �, <br /> ?.oning Adrr,in1sGi•ntpr Dtabusth stated that today she � <br /> wouldn't have a "" <br /> Council 'a PProved the fence because of tht =��� <br /> position on fences. Mabusth stated that �`�} <br /> the grading N�as revieaed with the bui ldin ��� <br /> that staf f approvec� the radin 9 p�zm�t and ��� <br /> that .�c chc tim� the grading waspreviewedbuthe fence <br /> Was not proposrd. � ��' <br /> ' i��; <br /> �� <br /> Kathy Jukish of 3280 Bayside Road asked Council if they �� <br /> could a�)opt a fence ordinance to prevent this type of <br /> fcnc� from b�ing constructPd in the future. Jukish <br /> askcc) Council if they could adopt a moratorium a � <br /> fenccs, n all - <br /> Ftayor Autler stated that the fence ordinance needs a f r4 <br /> lot of work and that it couldn't be accomp1ished ;,.�� <br /> ordinanc�bu Butlerf st ted that thet City has„tried <br /> � y� <br /> before to redo the fence ordinance but has had no luck. � � � <br /> Autl�r Su � .? <br /> constru�ti n4ott�l] f nc�sing e moratorium on ,� e9 <br /> '� , <br /> r <br /> ;�. <br /> �� � ,��'�. <br /> ` � <br /> � � 1�: <br /> . ;�; <br /> . , f. � . ' ,. . . � ,� � ,. �x. . . . .. � .., F ,...-'/ .L . .. . , �A. '� . ..C:�_ . . .. .. ,. . . <br />