Laserfiche WebLink
:`n;:� <br /> �,�a� <br /> :,:,. <br /> � <br /> ;�:� � <br /> �t, <br /> �.� : <br /> MIl10TES OP TAE pLA1fRIMG Ci0l41ISSIOIf MEE'tING O! M717 21• 29a�. P11GE 9 <br /> � . <br /> /832 MRRIg? gEBL John Lehmeyer of 320 Crestview 1lvenue stated that <br /> a�athetically the fence is incorrect for the <br /> neiqMorAood_ yel�ey�r noted that there are no oihez <br /> fences in the area like this one. Leluneyer s�ated <br /> that this is aettinq a precedence for thia <br /> neiqhborhood. <br /> Rarriet Hehl subnitted a letter from her neighbor Rose <br /> Madden of 350 Crestview Avenue. Chairpezson Goetten fi <br /> read the letter as followa: <br /> ,�. <br /> 'The reaaon r.►ost of us live in the Lake Minnetonka Area "� <br /> is because ve enjoy the surroundi�gs. Our natural � <br /> suzronndinqs are being shut away from us by fences such <br /> as tbe one on Oxtord Road. Also by some people � <br /> accuw�a�i,n�`:j�c�rs in their yard. I have lived ia ! <br /> ther.St��y�ea for 38 years and could en joy the bay ,� <br /> o����`''�ry'change seasons. This is being denied ,A <br /> b� t� felnce around the pzoperty on Oxford Road. <br /> Sincer+�1�, Rosc Madden" <br /> Chairperaon Goetten closed the ubli �: <br /> but discussion was continuedp amongh the nPl nninq �` <br /> Connnisaion members, <br /> Roveqno stated that Planning Commission must decide if <br /> staff ieterpreted the fence ordinance correctly. <br /> Adams felt that the fence does conform to all standards .'� <br /> of the geztinent ordinances. Adams stated that the � <br /> heigAt of the fence does conform to all pertirtent <br /> ordinances. Adama atated that he didn't feel that <br /> there has been illeqal filling and no siqns of a <br /> deliberate intent to violate the ordinances of the <br /> City. Adams stated that he didn't feel that the <br /> fillinq k,.,, done maliciously but that it doea appear <br /> that tl�e end reault of what haa happeaed is contrary to R� <br /> ahat the intent of the City's ordinances are. Adams <br /> felt that a compzomise ahould be made on the overall ;� <br /> heiqht of the fence or perhaps e change in the City'� <br /> fence ordinance aAould be aonsidered. Adams atated � <br /> that if no one lived on the other side of the f�nce that <br /> it wonld be a gzeat way to build a fence. � <br /> Chairperson Goetten stated that the City has tried in ;: <br /> the past to resolve the fence ordinance issue and has <br /> never Deen able to. Goetten steted that chanqinq the <br /> fence ordinance would be time consuming and yet en <br /> amen�ent of the code will not be able to addreaa the <br /> petitioner'a concern noa. <br /> Sime stat�d that at the existing grade is where the <br /> fence should have been put. Sime stated that he <br /> interpret. the City's ordinance to be existinq grade <br /> prior to �he berming of thia property. Sime stated <br /> that the fence should have been included in the plana. °`'' <br /> . � <br /> ,. . ... <br /> w . , . .,;,, . ,. . . :,> . .:.., •.. ,„�;. ,. � <br /> .�ti , ;,, <br /> .:. > ;. ,. . ,. ,. , . <br /> , , <br /> . . . : a <br />