Laserfiche WebLink
, <br /> ek k./ CITY OF ORONO <br /> RESOLUTION OF THE CITYfCOUNCIL <br /> rT G< NO. 6696 <br /> �k6SHO <br /> WHEREAS, on November 14, 2016, the City Council reviewed the application and <br /> the recommendations of the Planning Commission and City staff; and <br /> NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of Orono, Minnesota <br /> hereby approves the requested variances as described above based on one or more of the <br /> following findings of fact concerning the Property: <br /> FINDINGS OF FACT: <br /> 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #16-3876. The analysis contained within <br /> staff memos and the exhibits attached to the aforesaid memos,all minutes from the above <br /> mentioned meetings, and any and all other materials distributed at these meetings are <br /> hereby incorporated by reference. <br /> 2. The Property is located in the LR-1A Single Family Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. <br /> 3. The Property contains 144,597 square feet(3.3 acres)in area and has a defined lot width <br /> of 140 feet at the 75-foot setback and 115 feet at the ordinary high water level. <br /> 4. The Property is within Tier 1 and hardcover is limited to 25% according to the Stormwater <br /> Quality Overlay District. <br /> 5. Applicant has applied for the following variance[s]: <br /> a. Hardcover <br /> b. Wetland Setback <br /> c. Side Street Setback <br /> 6. In considering this application for variances, the Council has considered the advice and <br /> recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed variance <br /> upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic <br /> conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values <br /> of property in the surrounding area. <br /> ANALYSIS: <br /> 1. "Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes <br /> and intent of the ordinance . . . ." All of the proposed improvements are residential in <br /> nature, are minimal in scope, and do not conflict with the general intent of the Ordinance. <br /> 2 <br />