Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> I <br /> supplement follows National Academy of Sciences recommendations to increase <br /> I the regional sensitivity of wetland-delineation methods (National Research <br /> Council 1995).The intent of this supplement is to bring the Corps Manual up to <br /> date with current knowledge and practice in the region and not to change <br /> wetland boundaries." "...This Regional Supplement is designed for use with the <br /> I current version of the Corps Manual (Environmental Laboratory 1987) and all <br /> subsequent versions. Where differences in the two documents occur, this <br /> Regional Supplement takes precedence over the Corps Manual for applications <br /> in the Midwest Region." <br /> I <br /> National Wetland Inventory (NWI) maps (Figure 2), Web Soil Survey of Hennepin County map <br /> (Figure 3), Minnesota Public Waters Inventory maps (Figure 4), and 2010 aerial photographs <br /> I were reviewed prior to the site visit to identify areas that may be wetlands. Areas illustrating <br /> evidence of wetland conditions were examined in greater detail during the field survey. <br /> Vegetation, soils and hydrology were examined (as outlined in the 1987 Manual and the <br /> I Midwest Regional Supplement) and used to characterize wetland types and determine wetland <br /> boundaries. One sample transect was established in a representative wetland-to-upland transition <br /> zone in order to characterize the vegetation, soils, and hydrology of the site. A transect consists <br /> I of a representative upland sample point and representative wetland sample point. Information <br /> obtained at the sample points can be found on the field data sheets located in the Technical <br /> Documents section. <br /> IHydrophytic status of plants was based on the National Wetland Plant List issued on May 15, <br /> 2012 and effective June 1, 2012 and as characterized by the plant status on the Excel Midwest <br /> IRegion data sheet provided by the US Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District. <br /> Wetland boundaries were marked at the site by pink "Wetland Delineation" pin flags. The <br /> I wetland boundary is considered to be the topographically highest extent of the wetland basin; <br /> areas below the staked boundary met the three required wetland criteria while areas above were <br /> lacking in one or more of these criteria. Wetlands were classified in accordance with methods <br /> I described by Cowardin et al. (1979) and used in the NWI (e.g. PEMB, PSS 1 C, etc.), completed <br /> by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The Circular 39 and Eggers and Reed classification <br /> systems are also given. The indicator status of plants, as described in the Technical Documents <br /> I section, was determined using the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands — <br /> Midwest Region (Lichvar, Robert W. and John T. Kartesz 2009). <br /> I RESULTS <br /> I The National Wetland Inventory indicates the presence of one wetland within the study area <br /> (Figure 2). This wetland is a palustrine emergent seasonally flooded wetland (PEMC). This <br /> wetland complex also consists of a PEMF within the PEMC wetland. This wetland may extend <br /> onto the site as well depending on the season. <br /> 1 Svoboda Ecological Resources Bill&Mollie Reynolds <br /> Project Number: 2012-037 2 Orono,MN <br /> I <br /> I <br />