My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-09-2018 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2018
>
04-09-2018 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/26/2018 10:24:37 AM
Creation date
4/26/2018 10:24:35 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,April 9,2018 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> 20. LA18-000023—CITY OF ORONO,AMEND ARTICLE XI OF THE CITY CODE <br /> RELATED TO WETLANDS AND WETLAND SETBACKS—Continued <br /> seriously. Johnson stated he would recommend the City Council read some of the MCWD guidelines <br /> when it comes to the buffer areas. Developers and builders are required to put a$5,000 escrow down for <br /> a silt fence,along with a buffer agreement,to ensure that the area is not disturbed;and if it is disturbed, <br /> the area has to be restored. Johnson stated in his view the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District does a <br /> great job watching the wetlands and that he would encourage the City Council to talk to the Watershed <br /> District about their setbacks. <br /> Johnson stated some of the changes that have been made to Orono's regulations have been very helpful <br /> and that years ago people were reluctant to move to Orono given the regulations. Johnson stated the <br /> changes have helped change that feeling. <br /> Johnson provided the MCWD guidelines to the Council. <br /> Ordway asked how many requests for variances the City has received. <br /> Barnhart stated he does not recall any from a wetland setback primarily because the people are told by <br /> Staff that it is difficult to show practical difficulty,which is required for a variance. <br /> Ordway stated she appreciates the developer and the work they do in the community. Ordway noted there <br /> has been a lot of conversation revolving around fire pits and small sports courts but that a house within 35 <br /> feet of the wetland is very different than a fire pit and that they are two very different discussions. <br /> Dankey asked if there is a way to delineate the difference between a house right at the buffer versus <br /> something else at the buffer line. <br /> Walsh commented it would require a long list of prohibited items. <br /> Barnhart stated that type of regulation is difficult to enforce and that the City is attempting to move away <br /> from that type of delineation in their ordinances. Barnhart stated if the City Council is comfortable with <br /> an improvement within a certain distance from a wetland,they should specify that distance. <br /> Walsh stated people cannot mow it or fertilize that area. <br /> Dankey commented people are likely to mow it if it is right next to their house. Dankey stated if someone <br /> buys next to a wetland,they should know about it. <br /> Walsh stated it is the responsibility of the Watershed District to enforce their regulations. <br /> Crosby asked what the definition is of a wetland. <br /> Barnhart indicated there are specific standards that are required to be met to determine if it is a wetland <br /> and that there are different types of wetlands. Barnhart stated soils,vegetation and presence of water are <br /> only one component to it. <br /> Page 8 of 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.