Laserfiche WebLink
C. There is only 100 feet in lot depth; <br /> D. There is not an adequate area to build a house and <br /> meet the 75 foot setback requirement, the front, rear and side <br /> yard setbacks and hardcover regulations. <br /> 3 . The property has never been assessed a sewer unit <br /> charge in the amount of approximately $1270 to enable a house <br /> to be built on the property. <br /> 4 . The property has been evaluated for tax purposes in <br /> the past at a reduced amount to reflect the fact that this is <br /> a substandard lot upon which no house may be constructed. <br /> 5. The lot has historically been subject to flooding <br /> and is the natural drainageway to the lake for the surrounding <br /> watershed . There is no way to build on the property without <br /> diverting the surface water runoff in a manner contrary to <br /> the normal runoff pattern and onto the adjacent street. Any <br /> construction on the lot would be subject to periodic flooding. <br /> 6 . The property is substandard in size in relationship <br /> to the other lots in the area upon which development has <br /> already been completed. <br /> 7 . The granting of a variance for this property would <br /> result in additional : <br /> A. Traffic congestion; <br /> B. Surface water drainage problems; <br /> C. Surface water pollution problems in Lake Minnetonka; <br /> D. Congestion in the area; <br /> E. Diminution in value to the surrounding properties; <br /> F. Parking problems in the area. <br /> 8 . This lot is not serviced by municipal water. <br /> 9 . The applicant does not plan to build a house on the <br /> property at this time or in the near future . There has not <br /> been a house on this property for at least 40 years. <br /> 10 . This property appears to have been originally <br /> platted as a "commons" lot which traditionally has not been <br /> considered a buildable lot at the time of platting. <br />