My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018-00047 - new house
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
O
>
Oliver Hill
>
2320 Oliver Hill - 34-118-23-33-0074
>
Permits/Inspections
>
2018-00047 - new house
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 4:57:19 PM
Creation date
4/19/2018 11:12:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
2320
Street Name
Oliver
Street Type
Hill
Address
2320 Oliver Hill
Document Type
Permits/Inspections
PIN
3411823330074
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Christine Mattson <br /> From: Adam Edwards <br /> Sent: Friday, February 02, 2018 9:20 AM <br /> To: Christine Mattson <br /> Cc: Roger Peitso <br /> Subject: RE:2320 Oliver Hill/#2018-00047 <br /> Stamped the grading plan approved. <br /> From:Christine Mattson <br /> Sent:Thursday, February 01, 2018 10:10 AM <br /> To:Adam Edwards<aedwards@ci.orono.mn.us> <br /> Cc: Roger Peitso<rpeitso@ci.orono.mn.us> <br /> Subject: RE: 2320 Oliver Hill/#2018-00047 <br /> Adam, <br /> We received an updated survey dated 1-25-2018. Please review and provide comments. Thank you! <br /> From:Adam Edwards <br /> Sent:Tuesday,January 23,2018 4:49 PM <br /> To:Christine Mattson<CMattson@ci.orono.mn.us> <br /> Cc: Roger Peitso<roeitso@ci.orono.mn.us> <br /> Subject: RE:2320 Oliver Hill/#2018-00047 <br /> Chris, <br /> I've reviewed the subject plan and offer the following comments: <br /> 1. The plan depicts proposed grading within the wetland buffer. Alterations with in the wetland buffer are not <br /> allowed without a wetlands alteration permit. <br /> 2. The plan depicts grading downhill from the proposed Silt Fence. All soil disturbance should be within the <br /> perimeter erosion and sediment control measures <br /> 3. The proposed well location appears very close to the existing sewer stub location (which is not depicted on the <br /> plan). These two items must be de-conflicted. <br /> 4. Double silt fence must be provided for any work indicated within 50'of a wetland. <br /> 5. Perimeter sediment control measures must be installed by the contractor and inspected by the City prior to any <br /> work, including demolition.Contractor must provide minimum 24 hour notice prior to inspection. <br /> 6. A separate utility permit will be required for the sewer connection. <br /> Note the structure elevations established but the Development Plan are G=1001.2;TF 1001.5; and LL 993.5. Those on <br /> the proposed building grading plan are a foot higher. I am not sure if this makes a difference for your analysis but <br /> wanted to point it out. <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.