Laserfiche WebLink
land) or the new existing grade (when new grades are approved via an approved grading plan for a <br /> new'subdivision). <br /> To clarify for all: <br /> Pre-existing grade is the site topography prior to any road construction or site grading to establish <br /> drainageways and building pads. <br /> New existing grade is the new topography that was approved to be established as part of the <br /> subdivision review and approval process, as indicated on the approved grading plan. <br /> Current existing grade is the actual topography created on the site by the developer's grading <br /> contractor, as it exists today. <br /> Issues Encountered to Date - <br /> Lot 5, Block 1: Based on the most recent submitted survey work, the current existing grades for Lot <br /> 5, Block 1 do not match the approved grading plan, and in fact have extended the created building <br /> pad approximately 10-15 feet further eastward than the approved grading plan. The proposed house <br /> for Lot 5 is significantly larger than the conceptual footprint on the approved grading plan (2800 s.f. <br /> vs. 1800 s.f.); is located much closer to the cul-de-sac than the conceptual house; has a lowest floor <br /> half a foot higher than the concept plan; and has a basement ceiling height half a foot higher than the <br /> concept plan. Taking into account all these factors, the proposed house's lower level would just meet <br /> the requirements for being a basement based on the 'current existing grade', but it does not quite <br /> meet those requirements based on the 'new existing grade' (likely need to slide the house 3' to the <br /> west to meet the requirement for lowest level being a basement). An issue here is that the driveway <br /> apron in front of the garages is proposed at a slope of 8%-13% and increases to 40% in the northerly <br /> 8 feet of the already limited-depth driveway backup apron. This would appear to be less than <br /> desirable, although not regulated by City code. <br /> Lot 3, Block 1: We have determined that the upper floor for the house proposed for Lot 3, Block 1 is <br /> a story, not a half-story. Our analysis was forwarded to the architect last Thursday. <br /> Lot 1, Block 1: We have spent a significant amount of time assisting Kelly in resolving the placement <br /> of a house on Lot 1, Block 1 in order to make that lower level meet the criteria to be considered as <br /> basement. The latest information we reviewed indicated a house plan for which the lowest level was <br /> a story by definition. This information was sent to Kelly on May 13. <br /> Subdivision As-Built Grading Survey Required. All of the above make it imperative that the City <br /> be provided ASAP an as-built grading survey that will identify for the entire subdivision whether the <br /> current existing grade matches the new existing grade established in the approved grading plan. <br /> Assuming the as-built survey will show that the actual grading does not match the approved grading <br /> plan, additional review will be needed to determine whether or not actual site grading changes are <br /> necessary. Whether or not the current existing grades match the approved grading plan, we will be <br /> using the approved grading plan as the new existing grade for building height and story <br /> determinations. <br /> Willi has advised that Schoborg Land Services will not have a crew available to complete an as-built <br /> grading survey for approximately three weeks. For the time being, we will only accept surveys for <br /> individual building permits if they indicate the approved grading plan contours as well as the proposed <br /> final contours. <br /> Road Construction. I have been advised by Willi that the first lift of asphalt on the road is anticipated <br /> to be placed this week. Once the first lift is installed, we should be in a position to begin issuing <br /> building permits. <br /> 3 <br />