Re: Easement rights/dock,etc - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

0,111 �r VKVrvv ® CIG4(w) lu V0/41/YO IU:3Y LY :U4/ IU 140:1Y.5 a nonbuildable lot (no primary structure) . " The planning commission denied respondents' proposal and the city council passed a resolution citing the following reasons for denial : (A) The lack of the principal structure means that there is no individual responsible for protecting the dock nor the boats maintained at that dock. (8) An adjacent neigonhbTractorF. [Tilosn) already has a dock [the 1960 dock) located (C) The property is not wide enough to provide adequate parking. * * * (D) Approval of the use of an accessory structure such as a dock, without a principal structure would establish a negative precedent in dealing with a similar requests for lots of similar size. Respondents later sent a memo co the city council , outlining the concerns the city council expressed and suggesting a different proposal that they thought would satisfy thosa concerns . Respondents proposed conveying some property to Tillotson to provide him legal access to the lake, and building a single common dock to be shared by Tillotson, Peterson, and Stodola. At a city council meeting, the council denied the shared dock proposal . At a later meeting, the council adopted a resolution denying the shared dock proposal . The resolution indicated that : Council refused to accept the interpretation of the accessory use/structure on the following proposed by applicants findings : (A) The City has never credited a preliminary structure on an adjacent property to allow accessory uses or structures on lots that did not sustain principal residences . (B) The credit of the principal residence for. • an accessory use/structure. serving an adjacent property will establish a negative precedent • -3-