Laserfiche WebLink
Mike Gaffron <br /> From: Mike Gaffron <br /> Sent: Monday, March 10, 2014 9:49 AM <br /> To: Mike Gaffron <br /> Subject: FW: Info re 225 Old Crystal Bay Rd S <br /> Attachments: Septic data 225 Old Crystal Bay Rd S.pdf <br /> See thread below. <br /> Michael P.Gaffron <br /> Assistant City Administrator/Long Term Strategy <br /> City of Orono <br /> (Street Address)2750 Kelley Parkway <br /> (Mailing Address)P.O. Box 66,Crystal Bay,MN 55323 <br /> Phone:(952)249-4600 <br /> Fax: (952)249-4616 <br /> From: Mike Gaffron <br /> Sent: Friday, January 17, 2014 3:46 PM <br /> To: 'Robert Hare' <br /> Subject: RE: 790 Br d N Variance Z 2-5 0,C, F3 , 5 <br /> Robert— <br /> Here's the applicable code: <br /> 78-72 (b)(3) In R districts not served by public sanitary sewer. A lot of record in any R district in the <br /> city not served by public sanitary sewer must meet the area and width requirements of this chapter <br /> and shall not be utilized for single-family detached dwelling purposes without council approval. <br /> Administrative approval may be granted for a lot of record not meeting the lot area and width <br /> requirements if the planning director finds that the following conditions are met: <br /> a. The lot area and lot width each meet at least 50 percent of the district standard. (lot <br /> appears to meet 50% of 2 acres and 50% of 200' width) <br /> b. Suitable primary and alternate septic sites are identified on the property and are protected <br /> from future development by execution of a covenant '7'7'7'7? <br /> c. All other zoning ordinance requirements must be met, including but not limited to the <br /> following: <br /> 1.Setbacks. 50' front& rear, 30' sides <br /> 2.Hardcover. NA <br /> 3.Lot coverage by structures. 15% <br /> 4.Accessory structure requirements. <br /> Based on the above, it should be buildable, but it would be prudent to preserve the existing mound system if/when the <br /> house is removed. A copy of the septic data is attached—the existing system was installed in 1990. It might be wise to <br /> preserve the tanks also, but their re-use would be entirely dependent on the location of a new house on the site. <br /> Whoever demos the house should avoid driving all over the property because you will have to find at least one alternate <br /> septic site (and maybe two if the existing mound is in the way of a proposed new house). <br /> Mike <br /> 1 <br />