Laserfiche WebLink
Based on the information in the above paragraph,we request that the rock and fill placed on the south <br /> side of the driveway for the purposes of building a planter,as referenced in your item#4,would be <br /> allowed to stay as part of our land alteration permit#2012-01221 <br /> With regard to item#2 in your letter,we agree that the work involved in the project covered by permit <br /> #2011-01360 has not yet been completed. As per the conversation we had with you late fall of 2012, <br /> we will need to have some final grading work done once conditions allow in the spring of 2013 and <br /> would then plan to have the driveway blacktopped. We have done the work required for wetland buffer <br /> establishment,and will work with the city to get this permit closed out as soon as conditions allow. <br /> With regard to item#3 in your letter,we are responding with the following observations and requests; <br /> 1) The as-built survey was not required of us when the home was built and we do not feel it should be a <br /> requirement to receive the final certificate of occupancy. The items that were communicated to us that <br /> needed to be completed to receive the final occupancy have long been completed and a survey was not <br /> one of them. We have incurred a lot of cost in providing surveys over the last couple of years and we do <br /> not feel it is neither necessary nor fair to require us to provide yet another survey. <br /> 2) We will provide an as-built survey for the land alteration permit issued for driveway changes as soon <br /> as we are able to get that project completed(see above paragraph). <br /> 3) We believe the survey information provided with land alteration permit application#2012-01221 <br /> provides adequate information given the scope of this project. To require a full-scale survey for these <br /> very minor changes is in no way practical and should not be necessary. You would double the cost of <br /> this project by requiring a full-scale survey,which is not justified. We are not impacting wetland or <br /> wetland buffer areas,and the original complete survey done with our building permit#P09168(you <br /> have on file)provides the current information that you need regarding topography and wetland-related <br /> boundaries. What other areas could we be possibly impacting with such minor alterations? We request <br /> that you would apply a more practical approach to what you are asking of us. The survey requirements <br /> requested are the same as you would require on a full-scale building project. Again,we don't see how <br /> that can be justified for such a minor land alteration. <br /> Please let us know if you have further questions. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Scott&Michelle Miller <br /> Attachments: MCWD Letter <br /> Drawings 1 and 2 and copies of pertinent documents RECEIVED <br /> APR 4 2013 <br /> CITY OF ORONO <br />