Laserfiche WebLink
Proposal <br /> Due to the number of major, structural issues with the existing garage, rehabilitation does not make financial sense. <br /> There are simply not enough good qualities in the existing building that make it worth preserving. Additionally, <br /> rebuilding a new structure at the same location is not practical given the slope of the grade,the proximity to the <br /> powerline,the amount of"assumed" hardcover for the driveway/apron, and finally the nonconforming setback distance <br /> to the neighboring properties. <br /> My proposal is to demolish the existing garage and to build a new accessory structure in a different location that meets <br /> all property line setback requirements. The site of the existing garage would be filled in to flow with the existing grade <br /> on the sides of the structure. The area would be finished off with a combination of sod, shrubs,trees, and other <br /> landscaping. <br /> The new structure would be built on a new concrete slab closer to the existing home and main driveway. A new <br /> driveway apron would adjoin the new structure and the existing driveway"turn-around" area. <br /> EXISTING / N <br /> \\ �, HOUSE ,F�-°1Or \\ (940.7) \ \ � <br /> #3186 'x"" V �,.�)\ \\ \sk. \ <br /> \ PADO •771•01" • \ <br /> I / <br /> \ \ <br /> / (941.9) (941.5) \\ (94)' • <br /> / / ,E7 CONCRETE WALK <br /> i f` <br /> 4.4 / S <br /> / /' l a) <br /> / <br /> iii / <br /> I�- 1) !/ // <br /> I <br /> , 44, <br /> \ / / <br /> .... <br /> ,,, <br /> (9411 1• <br /> \ \ / <br /> \ \ .••• <br /> / // FX/s <br /> \ \ C nNQ <br /> (.r/! _7 \ \ �R <br /> 4 /1 \ \ / <br /> \ \ / '/ e., <br /> \\ ___ f (' '9) Y <br /> \ (iae \ (940.9) /// <br /> \ <br /> ...• <br /> / <br /> �C q"DRO1( ,,,- \ 24. <br /> N F� ,`�1 ` ' 'i7• ',( <br /> / <br /> OAK // <br /> -/' 250' / R <br /> ) pRO,o SETBACK //j <br /> GgRq�s�� Ll , <br /> GF - <br /> �t►' //,/' 1 <br /> 7 <br />